clark county - West Central Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Village of Dorchester (part) 18.1% Town of Mead 16.5% In terms of actual population increases, the Town of Fremont had the largest number of new residents (+227) between 1990 and 2000. The following communities all increased in population by over 100 residents during the 1990s: towns of Beaver, Dewhurst, Lynn, and Withee, Village of Dorchester (part), and cities of Greenwood, and Loyal. Numerous communities decreased in population during this timeframe: towns of Butler, Hendren, Mayville, <strong>West</strong>on, and York, Village of Unity (part), and City of Thorp. Map 1.2 shows the population change for Clark County communities between 1970 and 2000. Overall, the villages of Clark County have had the highest rates of population growth since the 1970s, though the towns grew slightly faster during the 1990s. Many of the fastest growing communities from 1970 to 2000 were areas which offered attractive natural amenities (e.g., forests, lakes/rivers, hunting lands), such as the towns of Foster, Hewett, Dewhurst. 4 Issues & Opportunities Information
Map 1.2 - Clark County Population Change (1970 to 2000) Clark County Conditions and Trends Report 5
Page 1: CLARK COUNTY CONDITIONS AND TRENDS
Page 5: Forward The Clark County Conditions
Page 8 and 9: Cooperative Educational Service Age
Page 10 and 11: Table 1.12 -West Central Wisconsin
Page 12 and 13: Appendix A: Clark County Resource a
Page 14 and 15: While Clark County has a total surf
Page 18 and 19: Like most of west central Wisconsin
Page 20 and 21: County were identified as being of
Page 22 and 23: part of this decade reflecting the
Page 24 and 25: Map 1.3 - Clark County Population P
Page 26 and 27: Table 1.13 shows employment project
Page 28 and 29: Table 1.3 Clark County Historical P
Page 30 and 31: Table 1.6 Clark County Change in Ag
Page 32 and 33: Table 1.7 continued Population by A
Page 40 and 41: Table 1.9 continued Percent Change
Page 42 and 43: Table 1.9 continued Percent Change
Page 44 and 45: Table 1.11 Household Projections (2
Page 46 and 47: Table 1.14 Clark County Race Charac
Page 48 and 49: Table 1.15 continued Educational At
Page 58 and 59: Table 1.16 continued Labor Force -
Page 60 and 61: Table 1.17 continued Labor Force -
Page 62 and 63: Table 1.19 Employment By Industry -
Page 64 and 65: Table 1.20 Employment By Industry -
Page 66 and 67:
Table 1.21 Employment By Occupation
Page 68 and 69:
Table 1.22 Employment By Occupation
Page 70 and 71:
Table 1.23 Travel Time to Work - 19
Page 72 and 73:
Table 1.27 Median Household Income
Page 74 and 75:
Seasonal Units Seasonal units are u
Page 76 and 77:
Summary Clark County contains
Page 78 and 79:
Table 2.2 Units in Structure - 2000
Page 80 and 81:
Table 2.4 Owner-Occupied Housing Co
Page 82 and 83:
Table 2.6 Housing Unit Projections
Page 84 and 85:
Table 2.7 continued Housing Charact
Page 86 and 87:
Page 88 and 89:
Page 90 and 91:
Page 92 and 93:
Page 94 and 95:
Page 96 and 97:
84 Housing Information
Page 98 and 99:
Background Data/Existing Conditions
Page 100 and 101:
Map 3.1 - Clark County Rural Functi
Page 102 and 103:
Table 3.4 - Functionally Obsolete a
Page 104 and 105:
Map 3.2 - Clark County Bicycling Co
Page 106 and 107:
Figure 3.1 - Clark County Crashes b
Page 108 and 109:
Commuting Patterns Residents of Cla
Page 110 and 111:
Summary The following summarizes th
Page 112 and 113:
Inventory of Utilities Utilities in
Page 114 and 115:
expression of the “Wisconsin Idea
Page 116 and 117:
Assisted Living Facilities, Nursing
Page 118 and 119:
Cemeteries Table 4.4 lists the ceme
Page 120 and 121:
Table 4.4 -Clark County Cemeteries
Page 122 and 123:
• The vast majority of private, o
Page 124 and 125:
Map 4.3 - Natural Gas Service in We
Page 126 and 127:
114 Utilities and Community Facilit
Page 128 and 129:
This provides an important context
Page 130 and 131:
Table 5.3 Assessed Agricultural Par
Page 132 and 133:
Figure 5.2 - Number of Farms and Da
Page 134 and 135:
Shorelands Shorelands provide valua
Page 136 and 137:
The table below identifies the numb
Page 138 and 139:
Forests and Woodlands Forests and w
Page 140 and 141:
designation there are variations du
Page 142 and 143:
Clark County Natural Resource Maps
Page 144 and 145:
Recent Economic Trends The economy
Page 146 and 147:
y five percent between June 2007 an
Page 148 and 149:
o o County Snapshots Office of Econ
Page 150 and 151:
Figure 6.3 - Clark County Age/Labor
Page 152 and 153:
Overall average annual wages for Cl
Page 154 and 155:
Figure 6.6 - Clark Co. Monthly Tota
Page 156 and 157:
Economic Base While the previous su
Page 158 and 159:
Figure 6.8 - Clark County Employmen
Page 160 and 161:
Employment by Occupation Like emplo
Page 162 and 163:
Employment Projections In November
Page 164 and 165:
Table 6.8 provides the estimated em
Page 166 and 167:
Tourism The “Fastest Growth” oc
Page 168 and 169:
As Figure 6.11 shows, travelers are
Page 170 and 171:
Clark County’s unemployment has m
Page 172 and 173:
Table 6.10 - Contaminated Sites in
Page 174 and 175:
Table 6.10 - Contaminated Sites in
Page 176 and 177:
164 Economic Development Informatio
Page 178 and 179:
Table 7.1 - Clark County Land Use -
Page 180 and 181:
Forest Land Use In 2007, the combin
Page 182 and 183:
In 2007, the towns with the largest
Page 184 and 185:
Summary Land development, the deman
Page 186 and 187:
Land Use Tables Table 7.6 Assessed
Page 188 and 189:
Table 7.8 Assessed Industrial Acres
Page 190 and 191:
Table 7.10 Assessed Forest Parcels
Page 192 and 193:
Table 7.12 Land Use Acreage by Muni
Page 194 and 195:
Table 7.14 Agricultural Land Sales
Page 196 and 197:
Table 7.17 Land Assessed Value per
show all

clark county - West Central Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?