24.09.2014 Views

Effects of planting - hole size, composting animal manure and sack on survival and growth of Eucaliptus camaldulensis , Ziziphus spina - chr isti and Pistasia atlantica planted in Mehran Plain, Iran

This study tested three methods thought to maintain soil moisture availability and thereby improve the performance of three species ( Eucaliptus camaldulensis , Ziziphu s spina - christi and Pistasia atlantica ) when planted in permanent landscape of Mehran plain: increased planting - hole size, composting animal manure and sack addition. Seedlings of the three species were grown in two planting - hole sizes (30*30*30 cm and 100 *100*100 cm), with and without composting animal manure, and with and without sack. The experiment was conducted in site (Mehran plain) in Ilam Province, Iran. Seedling growth and survival were monitored over 30 months. Seedling survival was >90% for all t hree species and did not differ significantly among any of the treatments. High rainfall in winter and autumn throughout and irrigation during the dry season the first year of the experiment may have enhanced seedling survival. Deeper planting - hole had the strongest effect on seedling growth for species, composting animal manure addition and sack had a positive effect on growth for all three species especially Eucaliptus camaldulensis . Seedlings growing in one - meter holes with composting animal manure and s ack had most height and diameter. The development and total number of roots were much better at this depth as compared to surface planting. Deep planting provides resistance to cyclones and induces earlier flowering and higher yields

This study tested three methods thought to maintain soil moisture availability and thereby improve the
performance of three species (
Eucaliptus camaldulensis
,
Ziziphu
s spina
-
christi
and
Pistasia atlantica
) when
planted in permanent landscape of Mehran plain: increased planting
-
hole size, composting animal manure and
sack addition. Seedlings of the three species were grown in two planting
-
hole sizes (30*30*30 cm and
100
*100*100 cm), with and without composting animal manure, and with and without sack. The experiment was
conducted in site (Mehran plain) in Ilam Province, Iran. Seedling growth and survival were monitored over 30
months. Seedling survival was >90% for all t
hree species and did not differ significantly among any of the
treatments. High rainfall in winter and autumn throughout and irrigation during the dry season the first year of
the experiment may have enhanced seedling survival. Deeper planting
-
hole had the
strongest effect on seedling
growth for species, composting animal manure addition and sack had a positive effect on growth for all three
species especially
Eucaliptus
camaldulensis
. Seedlings growing in one
-
meter holes with composting animal
manure and s
ack had most height and diameter. The development and total number of roots were much better at
this depth as compared to surface planting. Deep planting provides resistance to cyclones and induces earlier
flowering and higher yields

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

J. Bio. & Env. Sci. 2014<br />

Journal <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Biodiversity <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Envir<strong>on</strong>mental Sciences (JBES)<br />

ISSN: 2220-6663 (Pr<strong>in</strong>t) 2222-3045 (Onl<strong>in</strong>e)<br />

Vol. 5, No. 2, p. 63-71, 2014<br />

http://www.<strong>in</strong>nspub.net<br />

RESEARCH PAPER<br />

OPEN ACCESS<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Effects</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>plant<strong>in</strong>g</str<strong>on</strong>g>-<str<strong>on</strong>g>hole</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>size</str<strong>on</strong>g>, <str<strong>on</strong>g>compost<strong>in</strong>g</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>animal</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>manure</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>sack</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> <strong>survival</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>growth</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>Eucaliptus</strong> <strong>camaldulensis</strong>,<br />

<strong>Ziziphus</strong> <strong>sp<strong>in</strong>a</strong>- <strong>chr</strong><strong>isti</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>Pistasia</strong> <strong>atlantica</strong> <strong>planted</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Mehran</strong><br />

Pla<strong>in</strong>, <strong>Iran</strong><br />

Reza Ahmadi, Hojat Fathi, Jalal Nouri-nejad, Ali Akbar Jafarzadeh *<br />

Department <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Natural Resources <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Watershed, Ilam prov<strong>in</strong>ce, <strong>Iran</strong><br />

Article published <strong>on</strong> August 02, 2014<br />

Key words: Seedl<strong>in</strong>g, <str<strong>on</strong>g>plant<strong>in</strong>g</str<strong>on</strong>g>-<str<strong>on</strong>g>hole</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>size</str<strong>on</strong>g>, <str<strong>on</strong>g>compost<strong>in</strong>g</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>animal</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>manure</str<strong>on</strong>g>, <str<strong>on</strong>g>sack</str<strong>on</strong>g>, <strong>Mehran</strong> pla<strong>in</strong>, IRAN.<br />

Abstract<br />

This study tested three methods thought to ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> soil moisture availability <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> thereby improve the<br />

performance <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> three species (<strong>Eucaliptus</strong> <strong>camaldulensis</strong>, <strong>Ziziphus</strong> <strong>sp<strong>in</strong>a</strong>-<strong>chr</strong><strong>isti</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>Pistasia</strong> <strong>atlantica</strong>) when<br />

<strong>planted</strong> <strong>in</strong> permanent l<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>scape <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>Mehran</strong> pla<strong>in</strong>: <strong>in</strong>creased <str<strong>on</strong>g>plant<strong>in</strong>g</str<strong>on</strong>g>-<str<strong>on</strong>g>hole</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>size</str<strong>on</strong>g>, <str<strong>on</strong>g>compost<strong>in</strong>g</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>animal</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>manure</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>sack</str<strong>on</strong>g> additi<strong>on</strong>. Seedl<strong>in</strong>gs <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the three species were grown <strong>in</strong> two <str<strong>on</strong>g>plant<strong>in</strong>g</str<strong>on</strong>g>-<str<strong>on</strong>g>hole</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>size</str<strong>on</strong>g>s (30*30*30 cm <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

100*100*100 cm), with <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> without <str<strong>on</strong>g>compost<strong>in</strong>g</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>animal</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>manure</str<strong>on</strong>g>, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> with <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> without <str<strong>on</strong>g>sack</str<strong>on</strong>g>. The experiment was<br />

c<strong>on</strong>ducted <strong>in</strong> site (<strong>Mehran</strong> pla<strong>in</strong>) <strong>in</strong> Ilam Prov<strong>in</strong>ce, <strong>Iran</strong>. Seedl<strong>in</strong>g <strong>growth</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>survival</strong> were m<strong>on</strong>itored over 30<br />

m<strong>on</strong>ths. Seedl<strong>in</strong>g <strong>survival</strong> was >90% for all three species <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> did not differ significantly am<strong>on</strong>g any <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the<br />

treatments. High ra<strong>in</strong>fall <strong>in</strong> w<strong>in</strong>ter <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> autumn throughout <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> irrigati<strong>on</strong> dur<strong>in</strong>g the dry seas<strong>on</strong> the first year <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

the experiment may have enhanced seedl<strong>in</strong>g <strong>survival</strong>. Deeper <str<strong>on</strong>g>plant<strong>in</strong>g</str<strong>on</strong>g>-<str<strong>on</strong>g>hole</str<strong>on</strong>g> had the str<strong>on</strong>gest effect <strong>on</strong> seedl<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>growth</strong> for species, <str<strong>on</strong>g>compost<strong>in</strong>g</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>animal</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>manure</str<strong>on</strong>g> additi<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>sack</str<strong>on</strong>g> had a positive effect <strong>on</strong> <strong>growth</strong> for all three<br />

species especially <strong>Eucaliptus</strong> <strong>camaldulensis</strong>. Seedl<strong>in</strong>gs grow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>on</strong>e-meter <str<strong>on</strong>g>hole</str<strong>on</strong>g>s with <str<strong>on</strong>g>compost<strong>in</strong>g</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>animal</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>manure</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>sack</str<strong>on</strong>g> had most height <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> diameter. The development <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> total number <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> roots were much better at<br />

this depth as compared to surface <str<strong>on</strong>g>plant<strong>in</strong>g</str<strong>on</strong>g>. Deep <str<strong>on</strong>g>plant<strong>in</strong>g</str<strong>on</strong>g> provides resistance to cycl<strong>on</strong>es <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>in</strong>duces earlier<br />

flower<strong>in</strong>g <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> higher yields.<br />

* Corresp<strong>on</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g Author: Ali Akbar Jafarzadeh Jafarzadeh82@yahoomail.com<br />

63 | Ahmadi et al.


J. Bio. & Env. Sci. 2014<br />

Introducti<strong>on</strong><br />

The dem<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> for faster-grow<strong>in</strong>g, bigger <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> better<br />

seedl<strong>in</strong>gs has been ever-grow<strong>in</strong>g. As a result, forest<br />

seedl<strong>in</strong>g producti<strong>on</strong> is a c<strong>on</strong>t<strong>in</strong>ually evolv<strong>in</strong>g new<br />

technology <strong>in</strong> afforestati<strong>on</strong>. Evaluat<strong>in</strong>g seedl<strong>in</strong>g<br />

quality is crucial for underst<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g><strong>in</strong>g seedl<strong>in</strong>g<br />

development <strong>in</strong> the nursery, as well as subsequent<br />

field <strong>growth</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>survival</strong> (Ffoliot et al, 1995; Iqbal,<br />

1986; Kaul, 1970).<br />

The success <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> afforestati<strong>on</strong> depends <strong>on</strong> a wide range<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> factors, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g site c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s, species<br />

character<strong>isti</strong>cs, the specific <str<strong>on</strong>g>plant<strong>in</strong>g</str<strong>on</strong>g> techniques <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

treatments applied, as well as social <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> ec<strong>on</strong>omic<br />

factors (Evans, 1996). While there has been extensive<br />

silvicultural study for plantati<strong>on</strong> establishment <strong>in</strong> the<br />

dry l<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>s generally (Evans, 1996), the <strong>in</strong>formati<strong>on</strong><br />

available for <str<strong>on</strong>g>plant<strong>in</strong>g</str<strong>on</strong>g> native <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> n<strong>on</strong>-native tree<br />

species <strong>in</strong> <strong>Iran</strong> rema<strong>in</strong>s limited (Ahmadi et al, 2013;<br />

Jazireiee, 1998). Seedl<strong>in</strong>g establishment is c<strong>on</strong>sidered<br />

a crucial stage <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> tree regenerati<strong>on</strong>, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> it has been<br />

fairly widely reported that the success <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Seedl<strong>in</strong>g<br />

establishment depends <strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>plant<strong>in</strong>g</str<strong>on</strong>g> methods<br />

(Alex<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>er <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Stuart, 2003; Davies, 1988). A<br />

detailed underst<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g><strong>in</strong>g <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the factors c<strong>on</strong>troll<strong>in</strong>g<br />

seedl<strong>in</strong>g <strong>growth</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>survival</strong> is required for<br />

develop<strong>in</strong>g areas <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> enrichment <str<strong>on</strong>g>plant<strong>in</strong>g</str<strong>on</strong>g>.<br />

showed negative impacts <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>plant<strong>in</strong>g</str<strong>on</strong>g>-<str<strong>on</strong>g>hole</str<strong>on</strong>g> (Rose et al.,<br />

1997; Amid<strong>on</strong> et al., 1982; Ba<strong>in</strong>bridge, 1994; L<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>is<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Dumroese, 2006). The <str<strong>on</strong>g>plant<strong>in</strong>g</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>hole</str<strong>on</strong>g> may be filled<br />

with topsoil from the surround<strong>in</strong>g area, mixed with<br />

the recommended quantity <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> fertilizer or <str<strong>on</strong>g>manure</str<strong>on</strong>g>.<br />

Animal <str<strong>on</strong>g>manure</str<strong>on</strong>g> is very beneficial to the seedl<strong>in</strong>gs, due<br />

to its great water hold<strong>in</strong>g capacity <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> the micr<strong>on</strong>utrients<br />

that will become available with its<br />

decompositi<strong>on</strong>.<br />

In this study, we c<strong>on</strong>ducted a field experiment to test<br />

three methods thought to enhance below-ground<br />

humidity availability, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> thereby improve the<br />

performance <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> seedl<strong>in</strong>gs when <strong>planted</strong> to enrich<br />

degraded dry l<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>s. The three methods were: <str<strong>on</strong>g>animal</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>manure</str<strong>on</strong>g> additi<strong>on</strong>, <str<strong>on</strong>g>sack</str<strong>on</strong>g> additi<strong>on</strong> to floor <strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>hole</str<strong>on</strong>g><str<strong>on</strong>g>plant<strong>in</strong>g</str<strong>on</strong>g>,<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>in</strong>creased <str<strong>on</strong>g>plant<strong>in</strong>g</str<strong>on</strong>g>-<str<strong>on</strong>g>hole</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>size</str<strong>on</strong>g>.<br />

Compost<strong>in</strong>g <str<strong>on</strong>g>animal</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>manure</str<strong>on</strong>g> availability may str<strong>on</strong>gly<br />

limit seedl<strong>in</strong>g performance. Sack is thought to help <strong>in</strong><br />

soil moisture retenti<strong>on</strong> (Evans, 1996; Suhaili et al.,<br />

1998). The <str<strong>on</strong>g>size</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the <str<strong>on</strong>g>hole</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>in</strong>to which seedl<strong>in</strong>gs are<br />

<strong>planted</strong> may also significantly affect seedl<strong>in</strong>g <strong>survival</strong><br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>growth</strong> through changes <strong>in</strong> soil aerati<strong>on</strong>, root<strong>in</strong>g<br />

density, or rates <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>in</strong>filtrati<strong>on</strong>. The <strong>survival</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

<strong>growth</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> seedl<strong>in</strong>gs <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>Eucaliptus</strong> <strong>camaldulensis</strong>,<br />

<strong>Ziziphus</strong> <strong>sp<strong>in</strong>a</strong>- <strong>chr</strong><strong>isti</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>Pistasia</strong> <strong>atlantica</strong> under<br />

these three different <str<strong>on</strong>g>plant<strong>in</strong>g</str<strong>on</strong>g> methods were<br />

m<strong>on</strong>itored <strong>in</strong> barren l<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>Mehran</strong> pla<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> western<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>Iran</strong>.<br />

Plant<strong>in</strong>g method is <strong>on</strong>e <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> factors that affect most<br />

seedl<strong>in</strong>g performance <strong>in</strong> the field. Whether big<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>plant<strong>in</strong>g</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>hole</str<strong>on</strong>g> is a favorable practice to tree <strong>growth</strong> or<br />

not, rema<strong>in</strong>s as a c<strong>on</strong>troversial issue. There are lots <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

reports <strong>in</strong> both side <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the op<strong>in</strong>i<strong>on</strong>. Some authors<br />

agree about the advantages <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> seedl<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> bigger <str<strong>on</strong>g>hole</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

(Shipman, 1960; Stroempl, 1990; Paters<strong>on</strong>, 1997).<br />

Specifically for Eucalyptus, Goes (1977) <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Ahmadi<br />

(2013) recommended seedl<strong>in</strong>g <str<strong>on</strong>g>plant<strong>in</strong>g</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>in</strong> deeper<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>hole</str<strong>on</strong>g>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>size</str<strong>on</strong>g>. Also FAO (1981) recommended seedl<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>plant<strong>in</strong>g</str<strong>on</strong>g> the root collar a little below the surface <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the<br />

soil. The deeper <str<strong>on</strong>g>plant<strong>in</strong>g</str<strong>on</strong>g>-<str<strong>on</strong>g>hole</str<strong>on</strong>g> supposed advantages<br />

for proximity to get more underground water<br />

reserves. In disagree with previous reports, other<br />

Material <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> methods<br />

Study sites<br />

The experiment was c<strong>on</strong>ducted <strong>in</strong> <strong>Mehran</strong> pla<strong>in</strong>,<br />

which is located <strong>in</strong> the Southern Ilam prov<strong>in</strong>ce <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

<strong>Iran</strong>. <strong>Mehran</strong> county <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g arid regi<strong>on</strong>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>Iran</strong><br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> the vegetati<strong>on</strong> is not appropriate <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Be<strong>in</strong>g<br />

turned <strong>in</strong>to desert. This site are <strong>in</strong> the lowl<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>s (


J. Bio. & Env. Sci. 2014<br />

this regi<strong>on</strong>. The average annual temperatures range<br />

from 22 to 26 Cº <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> the average annual precipitati<strong>on</strong><br />

for the studied area amounts to 290 mm, most <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

which occurs <strong>in</strong> April <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> May.<br />

Fig 1. The view <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the sites studied (This area is part<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> a massive reforestati<strong>on</strong> project <strong>in</strong> <strong>Mehran</strong> Pla<strong>in</strong>).<br />

Study species<br />

Three species, <strong>Eucaliptus</strong> <strong>camaldulensis</strong>, <strong>Ziziphus</strong><br />

<strong>sp<strong>in</strong>a</strong>- <strong>chr</strong><strong>isti</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>Pistasia</strong> <strong>atlantica</strong>, were selected for<br />

this experiment. These species were chosen due to<br />

their importance for <strong>Iran</strong>’s dryl<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> their<br />

purported suitability for large scale <str<strong>on</strong>g>plant<strong>in</strong>g</str<strong>on</strong>g> (Arekhi<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Jafarzadeh, 2012). They have been widely used <strong>in</strong><br />

enrichment <str<strong>on</strong>g>plant<strong>in</strong>g</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> are thought to be am<strong>on</strong>g the<br />

more promis<strong>in</strong>g plantati<strong>on</strong> species due to their<br />

relatively fast <strong>growth</strong>.<br />

Eucalyptus is a diverse genus <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> flower<strong>in</strong>g trees <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>in</strong><br />

the myrtle family, Myrtaceae. There are more than<br />

700 species <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> eucalyptus, mostly native to Australia.<br />

Species <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> eucalyptus are cultivated widely <strong>in</strong> the<br />

tropical <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> temperate world. S<strong>in</strong>ce their<br />

<strong>in</strong>troducti<strong>on</strong> <strong>in</strong>to <strong>Iran</strong>, Eucalyptus species rema<strong>in</strong><br />

superior <strong>in</strong> terms <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> fast <strong>growth</strong>, multiple uses, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

suitability to small scale farmers <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> overall support<br />

to key sectors <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the ec<strong>on</strong>omy.<br />

<strong>Ziziphus</strong> is a genus <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> about 40 species <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> sp<strong>in</strong>y<br />

shrubs <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> small trees <strong>in</strong> the buckthorn family,<br />

Rhamnaceae, distributed <strong>in</strong> the warm-temperate <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

subtropical regi<strong>on</strong>s throughout the world. <strong>Ziziphus</strong><br />

<strong>sp<strong>in</strong>a</strong>-<strong>chr</strong><strong>isti</strong>, the Christ's Thorn Jujube is an<br />

evergreen tree native to northern <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> tropical Africa<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> southern <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Western Asia (Zohary, 1972). This<br />

species have been <strong>in</strong>digenous <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> study area.<br />

Pistacia <strong>atlantica</strong> is a native species to a secti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

Eurasia from the <strong>Iran</strong>ian Plateau to North Africa.<br />

(Mart<strong>in</strong>ez, 2008). P. <strong>atlantica</strong> is the most<br />

ec<strong>on</strong>omically important species <strong>in</strong> many parts <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>Iran</strong>,<br />

<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g the Zagros forests, where it is managed as a<br />

valuable forest tree. The res<strong>in</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> fruit were<br />

historically used for a variety <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> medic<strong>in</strong>al purposes.<br />

The res<strong>in</strong>, known <strong>in</strong> west <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>Iran</strong> as saqez, is still an<br />

important commodity. This species are adapted to<br />

desert or summer drought typical <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Mediterranean<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> semi-Mediterranean climate <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> can survive <strong>in</strong><br />

temperatures rang<strong>in</strong>g from - 10°C <strong>in</strong> w<strong>in</strong>ter to 45°C <strong>in</strong><br />

summer (Pourreza et al, 2008).<br />

Experimental design<br />

The experiment <strong>in</strong>volved three species, two <str<strong>on</strong>g>plant<strong>in</strong>g</str<strong>on</strong>g><str<strong>on</strong>g>hole</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>size</str<strong>on</strong>g>s (30*30*30 cm <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> 100*100*100 cm) <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

four treatments (with <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> without <str<strong>on</strong>g>compost<strong>in</strong>g</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>animal</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>manure</str<strong>on</strong>g>, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> with <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> without <str<strong>on</strong>g>sack</str<strong>on</strong>g>). For each, the<br />

eight treatment comb<strong>in</strong>ati<strong>on</strong>s (two <str<strong>on</strong>g>plant<strong>in</strong>g</str<strong>on</strong>g>-<str<strong>on</strong>g>hole</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>size</str<strong>on</strong>g>s<br />

by four treatments) occurred. In each treatment<br />

comb<strong>in</strong>ati<strong>on</strong>, 25 seedl<strong>in</strong>gs were l<strong>in</strong>e-<strong>planted</strong> <strong>in</strong> five<br />

rows with spac<strong>in</strong>g <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 5 m between adjacent seedl<strong>in</strong>gs.<br />

In total, 2400 seedl<strong>in</strong>gs were <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> the<br />

experiment. The seedl<strong>in</strong>gs <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> this species were<br />

trans<strong>planted</strong> to the permanent l<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>scape at the<br />

beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the wet seas<strong>on</strong> (October 2011). Their<br />

<strong>survival</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>growth</strong> m<strong>on</strong>itored over 30 m<strong>on</strong>ths<br />

(February 2013).<br />

Experimental treatments<br />

C<strong>on</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>er seedl<strong>in</strong>gs were <strong>planted</strong> <strong>in</strong>to either 30 cm *<br />

30 cm * 30 cm (wide*height *depth) or 100 cm * 100<br />

cm * 100 cm <str<strong>on</strong>g>hole</str<strong>on</strong>g>s (Fig 2). The smaller <str<strong>on</strong>g>plant<strong>in</strong>g</str<strong>on</strong>g>-<str<strong>on</strong>g>hole</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

was dug with a h<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>-held. The larger <str<strong>on</strong>g>plant<strong>in</strong>g</str<strong>on</strong>g>-<str<strong>on</strong>g>hole</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

was dug with an excavator. Removed soil was<br />

repacked around the roots <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> all seedl<strong>in</strong>gs after<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>plant<strong>in</strong>g</str<strong>on</strong>g>. The four treatments were <str<strong>on</strong>g>animal</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>manure</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

additi<strong>on</strong>, embed <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>sack</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> a comb<strong>in</strong>ati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>sack</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>manure</str<strong>on</strong>g> additi<strong>on</strong>. For <str<strong>on</strong>g>sack</str<strong>on</strong>g> additi<strong>on</strong>, after digg<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>hole</str<strong>on</strong>g>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> before seedl<strong>in</strong>gs <str<strong>on</strong>g>plant<strong>in</strong>g</str<strong>on</strong>g>, <strong>in</strong> the <str<strong>on</strong>g>hole</str<strong>on</strong>g>s floor<br />

were placed cott<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>sack</str<strong>on</strong>g>s. For <str<strong>on</strong>g>animal</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>manure</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

65 | Ahmadi et al.


J. Bio. & Env. Sci. 2014<br />

additi<strong>on</strong>, 100 g <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> this <str<strong>on</strong>g>manure</str<strong>on</strong>g> was buried <strong>in</strong> ca. 5 cm<br />

deep <str<strong>on</strong>g>hole</str<strong>on</strong>g>s around the seedl<strong>in</strong>gs.<br />

experiment the relative <strong>growth</strong> rate <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> surviv<strong>in</strong>g<br />

seedl<strong>in</strong>gs had changed significantly with seedl<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>hole</str<strong>on</strong>g>s. Seedl<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>planted</strong> under big <str<strong>on</strong>g>hole</str<strong>on</strong>g>s had greater<br />

<strong>in</strong>creases <strong>in</strong> maximum stem height than seedl<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

<strong>planted</strong> <strong>in</strong> the small <str<strong>on</strong>g>hole</str<strong>on</strong>g>s (Table 1).<br />

Fig 2. Seedl<strong>in</strong>gs <str<strong>on</strong>g>plant<strong>in</strong>g</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>hole</str<strong>on</strong>g>s with 1*1*1 meter<br />

dimensi<strong>on</strong> (<strong>Eucaliptus</strong> <strong>camaldulensis</strong> is the right <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

<strong>Ziziphus</strong> <strong>sp<strong>in</strong>a</strong>-<strong>chr</strong><strong>isti</strong> is the left).<br />

Stat<strong>isti</strong>cal analysis<br />

Seedl<strong>in</strong>g stem height <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> diameter, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>survival</strong> were<br />

assessed immediately after <str<strong>on</strong>g>plant<strong>in</strong>g</str<strong>on</strong>g>, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> after 30<br />

m<strong>on</strong>ths. Plant height to the tip <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the apical shoot was<br />

measured to the nearest 1 cm. Stem diameter was<br />

measured at 10 cm above ground level with electr<strong>on</strong>ic<br />

calipers. A nested-factorial analysis <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> variance<br />

(ANOVA) was used to analyze treatment effects <strong>on</strong><br />

seedl<strong>in</strong>g relative <strong>growth</strong> rates. So treatment effects<br />

were analyzed separately for each species. Post-hoc<br />

comparis<strong>on</strong>s follow<strong>in</strong>g significant ANOVAs were<br />

tested with Tukey HSD tests.<br />

Results<br />

Seedl<strong>in</strong>g <strong>survival</strong><br />

Seedl<strong>in</strong>g <strong>survival</strong> was high am<strong>on</strong>g all treatments for<br />

both species <strong>in</strong> this experiment. Mortality over 30<br />

m<strong>on</strong>ths was 3.5% for E. <strong>camaldulensis</strong>, 2.5% for Z.<br />

<strong>sp<strong>in</strong>a</strong>- Chr<strong>isti</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> 4% for P. <strong>atlantica</strong> with a total <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

<strong>on</strong>ly 240 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 2400 seedl<strong>in</strong>gs dy<strong>in</strong>g over the 30-m<strong>on</strong>th<br />

period. Mortality rates did not differ significantly<br />

between species, or am<strong>on</strong>g <str<strong>on</strong>g>plant<strong>in</strong>g</str<strong>on</strong>g> treatments.<br />

Although there was a lower proporti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> dead<br />

seedl<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> the larger <str<strong>on</strong>g>plant<strong>in</strong>g</str<strong>on</strong>g>-<str<strong>on</strong>g>hole</str<strong>on</strong>g> compared to<br />

seedl<strong>in</strong>gs grow<strong>in</strong>g under smaller <str<strong>on</strong>g>plant<strong>in</strong>g</str<strong>on</strong>g>-<str<strong>on</strong>g>hole</str<strong>on</strong>g>.<br />

Diameter <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> height <strong>growth</strong><br />

Treatments had a significant effect <strong>on</strong> diameter <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

height <strong>growth</strong> for all three species. By the end <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the<br />

Table 1. Height <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> diameter <strong>growth</strong> <strong>in</strong>crements for<br />

seedl<strong>in</strong>gs <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> E. <strong>camaldulensis</strong>, Z. <strong>sp<strong>in</strong>a</strong>- <strong>chr</strong><strong>isti</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> P.<br />

<strong>atlantica</strong>.<br />

Treatment<br />

Plant<strong>in</strong>g<str<strong>on</strong>g>hole</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>size</str<strong>on</strong>g>s<br />

E.<br />

<strong>camaldulensis</strong><br />

Diameter<br />

<strong>growth</strong><br />

(mm per<br />

year)<br />

Height<br />

<strong>growth</strong><br />

(cm per<br />

year)<br />

C<strong>on</strong>trol Big 2.2 (0.22) 62 (2.7)<br />

C<strong>on</strong>trol Small 2.1 (0.17) 56 (2.2)<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>manure</str<strong>on</strong>g> Big 2.6 (0.24) 69 (2.5)<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>manure</str<strong>on</strong>g> Small 2.5 (0.24) 67 (3.3)<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>sack</str<strong>on</strong>g><strong>in</strong>g Big 2.9 (0.27) 78 (4.5)<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>sack</str<strong>on</strong>g><strong>in</strong>g Small 2.7 (0.32) 66 (4.0)<br />

Manure plus<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>sack</str<strong>on</strong>g><strong>in</strong>g<br />

Manure plus<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>sack</str<strong>on</strong>g><strong>in</strong>g<br />

Big 3.2 (0.35) 85 (3.4)<br />

Small 3.0 (0.28) 64 (3.2)<br />

Z. <strong>sp<strong>in</strong>a</strong>- <strong>chr</strong><strong>isti</strong><br />

C<strong>on</strong>trol Big 1.8 (0.28 24.8 (1.2)<br />

C<strong>on</strong>trol Small 1.55 (0.35) 22.4 (1.4)<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>manure</str<strong>on</strong>g> Big 2.3 (0.32) 27.6 (2.0)<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>manure</str<strong>on</strong>g> Small 1.9 (0.27) 26.8 (2.5)<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>sack</str<strong>on</strong>g><strong>in</strong>g Big 3.1 (0.24) 31.2 (1.5)<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>sack</str<strong>on</strong>g><strong>in</strong>g Small 2.6 (0.24) 26.4 (1.2)<br />

Manure plus<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>sack</str<strong>on</strong>g><strong>in</strong>g<br />

Big 3.5 (0.17) 34 (1.4)<br />

Manure plus<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>sack</str<strong>on</strong>g><strong>in</strong>g<br />

Small 3.15 (0.22) 25.6 (1.7)<br />

P. <strong>atlantica</strong><br />

C<strong>on</strong>trol Big 1.65 (0.18) 14.8 (1.2)<br />

C<strong>on</strong>trol Small 1.45 (0.25) 12.4 (1.4)<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>manure</str<strong>on</strong>g> Big 1.9 (0.22) 17.6 (2.0)<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>manure</str<strong>on</strong>g> Small 1.7 (0.17) 16.8 (2.5)<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>sack</str<strong>on</strong>g><strong>in</strong>g Big 2.1 (0.14) 21.2 (1.5)<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>sack</str<strong>on</strong>g><strong>in</strong>g Small 1.98 (0.14) 16.4 (1.2)<br />

Manure plus<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>sack</str<strong>on</strong>g><strong>in</strong>g<br />

Big 2.5 (0.17) 24 (1.4)<br />

Manure plus<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>sack</str<strong>on</strong>g><strong>in</strong>g<br />

Small 2.21 (0.12) 15.6 (1.7)<br />

However the resp<strong>on</strong>se to treatments varied between<br />

the three species (Figs. 3, 4 <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> 5). For E.<br />

<strong>camaldulensis</strong>, there were str<strong>on</strong>g treatment effects.<br />

Manure additi<strong>on</strong> significantly enhanced seedl<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Height <strong>growth</strong> rates for all three species <strong>in</strong> study site.<br />

Seedl<strong>in</strong>gs with added <str<strong>on</strong>g>manure</str<strong>on</strong>g> had higher relative<br />

<strong>growth</strong> rates than c<strong>on</strong>trol seedl<strong>in</strong>gs. In additi<strong>on</strong>,<br />

seedl<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>manure</str<strong>on</strong>g> plus <str<strong>on</strong>g>sack</str<strong>on</strong>g> treatments had<br />

66 | Ahmadi et al.


J. Bio. & Env. Sci. 2014<br />

significantly higher <strong>growth</strong> rates than seedl<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

treated with <str<strong>on</strong>g>manure</str<strong>on</strong>g> al<strong>on</strong>e. Seedl<strong>in</strong>gs with added<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>manure</str<strong>on</strong>g> plus <str<strong>on</strong>g>sack</str<strong>on</strong>g> treatments <strong>in</strong> big <str<strong>on</strong>g>hole</str<strong>on</strong>g>s had ca. 35%<br />

higher relative <strong>growth</strong> rates than c<strong>on</strong>trol seedl<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong><br />

small <str<strong>on</strong>g>plant<strong>in</strong>g</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>hole</str<strong>on</strong>g>s.<br />

In the area, <str<strong>on</strong>g>manure</str<strong>on</strong>g> additi<strong>on</strong> significantly <strong>in</strong>creased<br />

seedl<strong>in</strong>g <strong>growth</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Z. <strong>sp<strong>in</strong>a</strong>- <strong>chr</strong><strong>isti</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> P. <strong>atlantica</strong>.<br />

For this species Seedl<strong>in</strong>gs, <str<strong>on</strong>g>sack</str<strong>on</strong>g> treatment had weak<br />

significant effects <strong>on</strong> <strong>growth</strong> rates (Figs. 4 <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> 5).<br />

Although, seedl<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>planted</strong> <strong>in</strong> big <str<strong>on</strong>g>plant<strong>in</strong>g</str<strong>on</strong>g>-<str<strong>on</strong>g>hole</str<strong>on</strong>g>s<br />

grew significantly better with <str<strong>on</strong>g>sack</str<strong>on</strong>g> additi<strong>on</strong>.<br />

Embedded <str<strong>on</strong>g>sack</str<strong>on</strong>g> treatment had a much weaker affect<br />

<strong>on</strong> seedl<strong>in</strong>g <strong>growth</strong> than <str<strong>on</strong>g>manure</str<strong>on</strong>g> additi<strong>on</strong> (Figs. 3, 4<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> 5). For E. <strong>camaldulensis</strong>, height <strong>growth</strong> rates<br />

were significantly <strong>in</strong>creased by <str<strong>on</strong>g>sack</str<strong>on</strong>g> additi<strong>on</strong> for<br />

seedl<strong>in</strong>gs grown <strong>in</strong> large <str<strong>on</strong>g>plant<strong>in</strong>g</str<strong>on</strong>g>-<str<strong>on</strong>g>hole</str<strong>on</strong>g>s. In both cases<br />

(<str<strong>on</strong>g>plant<strong>in</strong>g</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>hole</str<strong>on</strong>g>s type), height <strong>growth</strong> was significantly<br />

greater <strong>in</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>sack</str<strong>on</strong>g> additi<strong>on</strong> treatments than <strong>in</strong> c<strong>on</strong>trol<br />

treatments, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>in</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>manure</str<strong>on</strong>g> plus <str<strong>on</strong>g>sack</str<strong>on</strong>g> treatments than<br />

<strong>in</strong> nutrient-<strong>on</strong>ly treatments.<br />

Fig. 3. Mean relative Height <strong>growth</strong> rates <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

seedl<strong>in</strong>gs <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> E. <strong>camaldulensis</strong> grown <strong>in</strong> four<br />

treatments (C: c<strong>on</strong>trol, S: <str<strong>on</strong>g>sack</str<strong>on</strong>g><strong>in</strong>g, M: <str<strong>on</strong>g>manure</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

additi<strong>on</strong>, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> S+M: <str<strong>on</strong>g>sack</str<strong>on</strong>g> plus <str<strong>on</strong>g>manure</str<strong>on</strong>g> additi<strong>on</strong>) <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

two <str<strong>on</strong>g>plant<strong>in</strong>g</str<strong>on</strong>g>-<str<strong>on</strong>g>hole</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>size</str<strong>on</strong>g>s (big <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> small). Different<br />

letters <strong>in</strong>dicate significant differences (P < 0.05)<br />

between the means.<br />

Plant<strong>in</strong>g-<str<strong>on</strong>g>hole</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>size</str<strong>on</strong>g> did have a c<strong>on</strong>sistent significant<br />

effect <strong>on</strong> seedl<strong>in</strong>g <strong>growth</strong> rates <strong>in</strong> all species (Figs. 3,<br />

4 <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> 5). For E. <strong>camaldulensis</strong>, plants <strong>in</strong> big <str<strong>on</strong>g>hole</str<strong>on</strong>g>s<br />

had significantly higher <strong>growth</strong> rates than plants <strong>in</strong><br />

small <str<strong>on</strong>g>hole</str<strong>on</strong>g>s for other treatments -added plants. There<br />

were also significant <str<strong>on</strong>g>plant<strong>in</strong>g</str<strong>on</strong>g>-<str<strong>on</strong>g>hole</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>size</str<strong>on</strong>g> effects <strong>on</strong> Z.<br />

<strong>sp<strong>in</strong>a</strong>- <strong>chr</strong><strong>isti</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> P. <strong>atlantica</strong> <strong>growth</strong> <strong>in</strong> study site<br />

(Figs. 4 <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> 5). However, there was c<strong>on</strong>sistent trend,<br />

with c<strong>on</strong>trol plants do<strong>in</strong>g better <strong>in</strong> big <str<strong>on</strong>g>hole</str<strong>on</strong>g>s, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>sack</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

plus <str<strong>on</strong>g>manure</str<strong>on</strong>g> plants do<strong>in</strong>g better <strong>in</strong> big <str<strong>on</strong>g>hole</str<strong>on</strong>g>s.<br />

Plant<strong>in</strong>g-<str<strong>on</strong>g>hole</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>size</str<strong>on</strong>g> significantly affects the <strong>growth</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

three species seedl<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> all <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> treatments. In this<br />

study diameter <strong>growth</strong> showed similar patterns to<br />

height <strong>growth</strong> for each species.<br />

Fig. 4. Mean relative Height <strong>growth</strong> rates <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

seedl<strong>in</strong>gs <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Z. <strong>sp<strong>in</strong>a</strong>- <strong>chr</strong><strong>isti</strong> grown <strong>in</strong> four treatments<br />

(C: c<strong>on</strong>trol, S: <str<strong>on</strong>g>sack</str<strong>on</strong>g><strong>in</strong>g, M: <str<strong>on</strong>g>manure</str<strong>on</strong>g> additi<strong>on</strong>, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

S+M: <str<strong>on</strong>g>sack</str<strong>on</strong>g> plus <str<strong>on</strong>g>manure</str<strong>on</strong>g> additi<strong>on</strong>) <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> two <str<strong>on</strong>g>plant<strong>in</strong>g</str<strong>on</strong>g><str<strong>on</strong>g>hole</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>size</str<strong>on</strong>g>s (big <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> small). Different letters <strong>in</strong>dicate<br />

significant differences (P < 0.05) between the means.<br />

Fig. 5. Mean relative Height <strong>growth</strong> rates <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

seedl<strong>in</strong>gs <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> P. <strong>atlantica</strong> grown <strong>in</strong> four treatments (C:<br />

c<strong>on</strong>trol, S: <str<strong>on</strong>g>sack</str<strong>on</strong>g><strong>in</strong>g, M: <str<strong>on</strong>g>manure</str<strong>on</strong>g> additi<strong>on</strong>, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> S+M:<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>sack</str<strong>on</strong>g> plus <str<strong>on</strong>g>manure</str<strong>on</strong>g> additi<strong>on</strong>) <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> two <str<strong>on</strong>g>plant<strong>in</strong>g</str<strong>on</strong>g>-<str<strong>on</strong>g>hole</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>size</str<strong>on</strong>g>s (big <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> small). Different letters <strong>in</strong>dicate<br />

significant differences (P < 0.05) between the means.<br />

67 | Ahmadi et al.


J. Bio. & Env. Sci. 2014<br />

Discussi<strong>on</strong><br />

<strong>Ziziphus</strong> <strong>sp<strong>in</strong>a</strong>- <strong>chr</strong><strong>isti</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>Pistasia</strong> <strong>atlantica</strong> are the<br />

most important species <strong>on</strong> the basis <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> low ecological<br />

needs <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> high tolerance aga<strong>in</strong>st summer heat <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

w<strong>in</strong>ter dry. It is very current <strong>in</strong> forest plantati<strong>on</strong> <strong>in</strong><br />

degraded ecosystems <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> dry <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> semi-dry l<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>s <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>Iran</strong> (Pourreza et al., 2008 Ahmadi et al., 2013).<br />

In this study seedl<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>survival</strong> rates <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> >90% over 30<br />

m<strong>on</strong>ths are excepti<strong>on</strong>ally high for <strong>Eucaliptus</strong><br />

<strong>camaldulensis</strong> plantati<strong>on</strong> experiments. Most other<br />

studies <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g afforestati<strong>on</strong> have reported<br />

substantially higher mortality rates. For example,<br />

Suhaili et al. (1998) found seedl<strong>in</strong>g mortality rates <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

22% for E. <strong>camaldulensis</strong> over the first 6 m<strong>on</strong>ths <strong>in</strong><br />

degraded l<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>in</strong> Pen<strong>in</strong>sular Malaysia. In several<br />

other afforestati<strong>on</strong> studies <strong>in</strong> Southwest Asia,<br />

mortality rates have been 20–40% <strong>in</strong> the first few<br />

years <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> sometimes even higher (Mart<strong>in</strong>, 1946<br />

Nussbaum et al, 1995; Gupta, 1991; Pourreza et al.,<br />

2008). It seems that the high <strong>survival</strong> rates <strong>in</strong> this<br />

study were due to a highly favorable soil water<br />

envir<strong>on</strong>ment, Because <strong>in</strong> mehran pla<strong>in</strong>, water<br />

availability is <strong>on</strong>e <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the most important variables that<br />

c<strong>on</strong>tribute to successful establishment <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>growth</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

seedl<strong>in</strong>gs. High ra<strong>in</strong>fall <strong>in</strong> w<strong>in</strong>ter <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> autumn<br />

throughout <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> irrigati<strong>on</strong> dur<strong>in</strong>g the dry seas<strong>on</strong> the<br />

first year <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the experiment may have enhanced<br />

seedl<strong>in</strong>g <strong>survival</strong>.<br />

The seedl<strong>in</strong>g <str<strong>on</strong>g>plant<strong>in</strong>g</str<strong>on</strong>g> method is a <strong>on</strong>e <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the agents<br />

that affect most plant efficiency <strong>in</strong> the permanent<br />

habitat. Plant<strong>in</strong>g-<str<strong>on</strong>g>hole</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>size</str<strong>on</strong>g> shows str<strong>on</strong>g <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

c<strong>on</strong>sistent effect <strong>on</strong> seedl<strong>in</strong>g <strong>growth</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> all three<br />

species <strong>in</strong> this experiment. This agrees with other<br />

authors (Shipman, 1960 Stroempl, 1990 Paters<strong>on</strong>,<br />

1997), but c<strong>on</strong>troversial results sere showed for<br />

different authors. Where some <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> them reported that<br />

deeper <str<strong>on</strong>g>plant<strong>in</strong>g</str<strong>on</strong>g> give results <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> lower <strong>growth</strong> rates<br />

(Paters<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Maki, 1994 Alex<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>er <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Stuart,<br />

2003 Ruiz et al, 2014). Increased <str<strong>on</strong>g>plant<strong>in</strong>g</str<strong>on</strong>g>-<str<strong>on</strong>g>hole</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>size</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

might benefit seedl<strong>in</strong>g efficiency through <strong>in</strong>creased<br />

<strong>in</strong>filtrati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> hence water availability, reduced<br />

compacti<strong>on</strong> <strong>in</strong> a larger soil volume surround<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

roots, or through decreased root competiti<strong>on</strong> <strong>in</strong> the<br />

early stages <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> establishment <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>growth</strong>. Ohler<br />

(1999) found that <strong>in</strong> the dry climate <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Karnataka<br />

(India), <str<strong>on</strong>g>plant<strong>in</strong>g</str<strong>on</strong>g> at depths <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 60 <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> 90 cm gave<br />

better results than at depths <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 0 <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> 30 cm. The best<br />

results <strong>in</strong> earl<strong>in</strong>ess <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> cumulative yield were<br />

observed at a <str<strong>on</strong>g>plant<strong>in</strong>g</str<strong>on</strong>g> depth <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 60 cm. Deep <str<strong>on</strong>g>plant<strong>in</strong>g</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>hole</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>in</strong> our study area provides resistance to warm<br />

w<strong>in</strong>ds <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>in</strong>duces higher yields. Results <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

treatments have shown that <str<strong>on</strong>g>plant<strong>in</strong>g</str<strong>on</strong>g> at <strong>on</strong>e meter<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>hole</str<strong>on</strong>g>s resulted <strong>in</strong> 30 m<strong>on</strong>ths <strong>in</strong>creased annual yields<br />

compared to the c<strong>on</strong>trol.<br />

The result <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> this study shows that <strong>Eucaliptus</strong><br />

<strong>camaldulensis</strong> under c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> low <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> irregular<br />

ra<strong>in</strong>fall can be successfully established by big <str<strong>on</strong>g>plant<strong>in</strong>g</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>hole</str<strong>on</strong>g>s. In dry <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> semi-dry l<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>s such as west <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>Iran</strong>,<br />

the best time for <str<strong>on</strong>g>plant<strong>in</strong>g</str<strong>on</strong>g> seedl<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> the permanent<br />

field is at the beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the ra<strong>in</strong>y seas<strong>on</strong>, after the<br />

ra<strong>in</strong>s have started to fall regularly. Seedl<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>planted</strong><br />

late <strong>in</strong> the ra<strong>in</strong>y seas<strong>on</strong> may not be able to develop a<br />

root system large enough to survive the dry seas<strong>on</strong><br />

(Ahmadi, 2013).<br />

Compost<strong>in</strong>g <str<strong>on</strong>g>animal</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>manure</str<strong>on</strong>g> additi<strong>on</strong> plus <str<strong>on</strong>g>sack</str<strong>on</strong>g><strong>in</strong>g had<br />

the str<strong>on</strong>gest affect <strong>on</strong> seedl<strong>in</strong>g <strong>growth</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the<br />

treatments applied <strong>in</strong> this experiment. Positive<br />

resp<strong>on</strong>ses to soil <str<strong>on</strong>g>manure</str<strong>on</strong>g> additi<strong>on</strong> have been found <strong>in</strong><br />

other field experiments <strong>in</strong> seas<strong>on</strong>al Southeast Asia<br />

(e.g., Nussbaum et al., 1995), however very few<br />

species have been tested for a <str<strong>on</strong>g>manure</str<strong>on</strong>g> resp<strong>on</strong>se <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

these studies have been d<strong>on</strong>e <strong>in</strong> <strong>on</strong>ly a few sites.<br />

<strong>Mehran</strong> pla<strong>in</strong> have relatively low soil- nutrient status<br />

for tropical soils, for this reas<strong>on</strong>, all three species<br />

resp<strong>on</strong>ded str<strong>on</strong>gly to <str<strong>on</strong>g>manure</str<strong>on</strong>g> additi<strong>on</strong> at mehran<br />

pla<strong>in</strong>. It is suggested that <strong>in</strong> future studies, tissue<br />

nutrient analysis be c<strong>on</strong>ducted to assess whether the<br />

seedl<strong>in</strong>gs received the nutrients <strong>in</strong> the sites. This<br />

would also enable a more critical assessment <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the<br />

nature <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> nutrient limitati<strong>on</strong> for these species (Webb<br />

et al., 2000).<br />

Sack or gunny <str<strong>on</strong>g>sack</str<strong>on</strong>g> is an <strong>in</strong>expensive bag made <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

burlap usually formed from jute or other natural<br />

68 | Ahmadi et al.


J. Bio. & Env. Sci. 2014<br />

fibers. They are c<strong>on</strong>sidered to be envir<strong>on</strong>mentally<br />

friendly <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> high breathability allows air to pass<br />

through them <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> have a high ability to reta<strong>in</strong><br />

moisture <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> water absorpti<strong>on</strong>. Sack additi<strong>on</strong><br />

significantly improved the <strong>growth</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> seedl<strong>in</strong>g than<br />

c<strong>on</strong>trol plots especially for E. <strong>camaldulensis</strong>.<br />

However, the effect was much weaker than the soil<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>manure</str<strong>on</strong>g> effect <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> it was not c<strong>on</strong>sistent am<strong>on</strong>g<br />

treatments; e.g., plants <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> P. <strong>atlantica</strong> given mulch<br />

did not grow better than c<strong>on</strong>trol seedl<strong>in</strong>gs, but <str<strong>on</strong>g>sack</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

plus <str<strong>on</strong>g>manure</str<strong>on</strong>g> plants grew better than <str<strong>on</strong>g>sack</str<strong>on</strong>g>-<strong>on</strong>ly<br />

seedl<strong>in</strong>gs. Sack additi<strong>on</strong> is thought to enhance<br />

seedl<strong>in</strong>g <strong>survival</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> performance <strong>in</strong> plantati<strong>on</strong>s by<br />

aid<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> soil moisture retenti<strong>on</strong> (Davies, 1988;<br />

Evans, 1996).<br />

The overall c<strong>on</strong>clusi<strong>on</strong> is that, this experiment<br />

dem<strong>on</strong>strated that <str<strong>on</strong>g>hole</str<strong>on</strong>g>-<str<strong>on</strong>g>plant<strong>in</strong>g</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>size</str<strong>on</strong>g> str<strong>on</strong>gly limits<br />

the <strong>growth</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>Eucaliptus</strong> <strong>camaldulensis</strong>, <strong>Ziziphus</strong><br />

<strong>sp<strong>in</strong>a</strong>- <strong>chr</strong><strong>isti</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>Pistasia</strong> <strong>atlantica</strong> species when<br />

<strong>planted</strong> <strong>in</strong> a low ra<strong>in</strong>fall areas, post-shift<strong>in</strong>g<br />

cultivati<strong>on</strong>, sec<strong>on</strong>dary successi<strong>on</strong> site <strong>in</strong> the west <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

<strong>Iran</strong>. Manure additi<strong>on</strong> may positively affect seedl<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>growth</strong>, depend<strong>in</strong>g <strong>on</strong> other site c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s. Putt<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>sack</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>in</strong> the bottom <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the <str<strong>on</strong>g>plant<strong>in</strong>g</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>hole</str<strong>on</strong>g> had a<br />

relatively m<strong>in</strong>or effect <strong>on</strong> seedl<strong>in</strong>g <strong>growth</strong>. An<br />

important implicati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> this study is that the results<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> seedl<strong>in</strong>g <str<strong>on</strong>g>plant<strong>in</strong>g</str<strong>on</strong>g> experiments may <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>ten be<br />

specific to the particular areas <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> envir<strong>on</strong>mental<br />

c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s <strong>in</strong> which the study is c<strong>on</strong>ducted.<br />

Experimental studies across a wider range <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> areas, <strong>in</strong><br />

which resource availability <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> fluxes are carefully<br />

measured, are required for the development <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

protocols for <str<strong>on</strong>g>plant<strong>in</strong>g</str<strong>on</strong>g> the studied species. Such<br />

research is essential if the recent <strong>in</strong>itiatives by <strong>Iran</strong><br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> other Southwest Asian countries to exp<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> the<br />

area <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> plantati<strong>on</strong> forests are to be successful.<br />

References<br />

Ahmadi R, Fathi H, Noor<strong>in</strong>ejad J, jafarzadeh,<br />

AA. 2013. Ecological capability assessment for<br />

afforestati<strong>on</strong> us<strong>in</strong>g GIS- based multiple criteria decisi<strong>on</strong><br />

mak<strong>in</strong>g approach (Case study; <strong>Mehran</strong> County, <strong>Iran</strong>).<br />

Elixir Internati<strong>on</strong>al Journal 63, 18046-18051.<br />

Ahmadi R, Kiadaliri H, Mataji A, Babaei-<br />

Kafaki S. 2014. Oak forest decl<strong>in</strong>e z<strong>on</strong>ati<strong>on</strong> us<strong>in</strong>g<br />

AHP model <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> GIS technique <strong>in</strong> Zagros Forests <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

Ilam Prov<strong>in</strong>ce. Journal <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Biodiversity <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

Envir<strong>on</strong>mental Sciences 4, 141-150.<br />

Alex<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>er V, Stuart JD. 2003. <str<strong>on</strong>g>Effects</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> nutrient<br />

additi<strong>on</strong>, mulch<strong>in</strong>g <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>plant<strong>in</strong>g</str<strong>on</strong>g>-<str<strong>on</strong>g>hole</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>size</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> early<br />

performance <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Dryobalanops aromatica <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Shorea<br />

parvifolia <strong>planted</strong> <strong>in</strong> sec<strong>on</strong>dary forest <strong>in</strong> Sarawak,<br />

Malaysia. Forest Ecology <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Management 180, 261–271.<br />

DOI: 10.1016/S0378-1127(02)00562-5<br />

Amid<strong>on</strong> TE, Barnett JP, Gallageher HP,<br />

McGilvray JM. 1982. A field test <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>erized<br />

seedl<strong>in</strong>gs under drought c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s. In: Guil<strong>in</strong>, R.W.<br />

Barnett, J.P. (Eds.), Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the Southern<br />

C<strong>on</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>erized Forest Tree Seedl<strong>in</strong>g C<strong>on</strong>ference.<br />

USDA Forest Service, Southern Forest Experiment<br />

Stati<strong>on</strong>. Gen. Tech. Rep. SO 37, 139–144.<br />

Arekhi S, Jafarzadeh AA. 2012. Forecast<strong>in</strong>g areas<br />

vulnerable to forest c<strong>on</strong>versi<strong>on</strong> us<strong>in</strong>g artificial neural<br />

network <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> GIS (case study: northern Ilam forests,<br />

Ilam prov<strong>in</strong>ce, <strong>Iran</strong>). Arab J Geosci 7, 1073–1085.<br />

DOI 10.1007/s12517-012-0785-1<br />

Ba<strong>in</strong>bridge DA. 1994. C<strong>on</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>er optimizati<strong>on</strong> –<br />

field data support c<strong>on</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>er <strong>in</strong>novati<strong>on</strong>. In: L<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>is,<br />

T.D., Dumroese, R.K. (Eds.), Nati<strong>on</strong>al Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs,<br />

Forest <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> C<strong>on</strong>servati<strong>on</strong> Nursery Associati<strong>on</strong>s. USDA<br />

Forest Service, Rocky Mounta<strong>in</strong> Forest <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Range<br />

Experiment Stati<strong>on</strong>. Gen Tech. Rep. RM-GTR-257,<br />

99–104.<br />

Davies RJ. 1988. Sheet mulch<strong>in</strong>g as an aid to<br />

broadleaved tree establishment. Forestry 61, 91–105.<br />

DOI: 10.1093/forestry/61.2.89<br />

Evans J. 1996. Plantati<strong>on</strong> Forestry <strong>in</strong> the Tropics,<br />

2nd ed. Oxford University Press, New York.<br />

FAO. 1981. El eucalipto en la repoblaci<strong>on</strong> forestal.<br />

Roma, Italia, 210-220.<br />

69 | Ahmadi et al.


J. Bio. & Env. Sci. 2014<br />

Ffoliot PF, Brook KN, Gregresen HM,<br />

Lundgren AL. 1995. Evaluati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> afforestati<strong>on</strong> <strong>in</strong><br />

arid l<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>s. Dry l<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> forestry 32, 217-43.<br />

Ohler JG. 1999. Modern Coc<strong>on</strong>ut Management;<br />

palm cultivati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> products. Intermediate<br />

Technology Publicati<strong>on</strong>s, Social Science, 458 p.<br />

Geos E. 1977. Os eucaliptos. Portucel. Centero de<br />

Producao Florestal. Lisboa, Portugal.<br />

Gupta GN. 1991. <str<strong>on</strong>g>Effects</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> mulch<strong>in</strong>g <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> fertilizer<br />

applicati<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> <strong>in</strong>itial development <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> some tree<br />

species. For. Ecol. Manage 44, 211–221.<br />

DOI: 10.1016/0378-1127(91)90009-K<br />

Iqbal SM. 1986. Afforestati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> arid semiarid <strong>in</strong><br />

Pakistan. Pakistan Forest Institue, Peshawar. 154-26.<br />

Paters<strong>on</strong> J. 1997. Grow<strong>in</strong>g envir<strong>on</strong>ment <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

c<strong>on</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>er type <strong>in</strong>fluence field performance <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> black<br />

spruce c<strong>on</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>er stock. New For 13, 329–339.<br />

DOI: 10.1023/A:1006598611412<br />

Paters<strong>on</strong> JM, Maki DS. 1994. Effect <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>in</strong>itial<br />

seedl<strong>in</strong>g morphology <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>plant<strong>in</strong>g</str<strong>on</strong>g> practices <strong>on</strong> field<br />

performance <strong>on</strong> jack p<strong>in</strong>e 6 years after <str<strong>on</strong>g>plant<strong>in</strong>g</str<strong>on</strong>g>.<br />

OMNR. Ont. For. Res. Inst. Sault Ste. Marie, Ont. For.<br />

Res. Rep. 130p.<br />

Kaul RN. 1970. Afforestati<strong>on</strong> <strong>in</strong> arid l<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>s. junk<br />

N.V.Publishers, The Netherl<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>s, 235-48.<br />

L<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>is TD, Dumroese RK. 2006. Apply<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

Target Plant C<strong>on</strong>cept to nursery stock quality. In:<br />

MacLennan, L., Fennessy, J. (Eds.), Plant Quality: A<br />

Key to Success <strong>in</strong> Forest Establishment. Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the COFORD C<strong>on</strong>ference. Nati<strong>on</strong>al Council for<br />

Forest Research <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Development, Dubl<strong>in</strong>, Irel<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>,<br />

1–10.<br />

Pourreza M, Shaw JD, Zangeneh H. 2008.<br />

Susta<strong>in</strong>ability <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> wild pistachio (Pistacia <strong>atlantica</strong><br />

Desf.) <strong>in</strong> Zagros forests, <strong>Iran</strong>. Forest Ecology <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

Management 255, 3667-71.<br />

DOI:10.1016/j.foreco.2008.01.057<br />

Rose R, Haase DL, Kroiher F, Sab<strong>in</strong> T. 1997.<br />

Root volume <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>growth</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> p<strong>on</strong>derosa p<strong>in</strong>e <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

Douglas-fir seedl<strong>in</strong>gs: a summary <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> eight grow<strong>in</strong>g<br />

seas<strong>on</strong>s. West. J. Appl. For 12, 69–73.<br />

Mart<strong>in</strong> BM. 1946. Impresi<strong>on</strong>es comentadas sobre<br />

los eucaliptos de Sierra Cabello. Instituto Forestal de<br />

Investigaci<strong>on</strong>es. Y experiencias. Ano XVII,32. Madrid,<br />

Espana.<br />

Mart<strong>in</strong>ez JJI. 2008. Impact <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> a gall-<strong>in</strong>duc<strong>in</strong>g aphid<br />

<strong>on</strong> Pistacia <strong>atlantica</strong> trees. Arthropod-Plant<br />

Interacti<strong>on</strong>s 2, 147-51. DOI:10.1007/s11829-008-<br />

9042-7<br />

Nussbaum R, Anders<strong>on</strong> J, Spencer T. 1995.<br />

Factors limit<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>growth</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>in</strong>digenous tree<br />

seedl<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>planted</strong> <strong>on</strong> degraded ra<strong>in</strong>forest soils <strong>in</strong><br />

Sabah, Malaysia. For. Ecol. Manage 74, 149–159.<br />

DOI: 10.1016/0378-1127(94)03496-J<br />

Ruiz F, López G, Toval G. 2014. Deep-Plant<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Influence <strong>on</strong> the Development <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Growth <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

Eucalyptus globulus (Labill.) Cl<strong>on</strong>al Cutt<strong>in</strong>gs.<br />

Internati<strong>on</strong>al IUFRO C<strong>on</strong>ference <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the WP2.08.03<br />

<strong>on</strong> Silviculture <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Improvement <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Eucalyptus, At<br />

Aveiro, Portugal, Volume: I.<br />

South DB, Jacks<strong>on</strong> DP, Starkey TE, Enebak<br />

SA. 2012. Plant<strong>in</strong>g Deep Increases Early Survival<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Growth <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> P<strong>in</strong>us ech<strong>in</strong>ata Seedl<strong>in</strong>gs. The Open<br />

Forest Science Journal 5, 33-41.<br />

Stroempl G. 1990. Deeper <str<strong>on</strong>g>plant<strong>in</strong>g</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> seedl<strong>in</strong>gs <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

transplants <strong>in</strong>creases plantati<strong>on</strong> <strong>survival</strong>. Tree<br />

Planters Notes 41, 17–21.<br />

70 | Ahmadi et al.


J. Bio. & Env. Sci. 2014<br />

Suhaili R, Majid NM, Hamzah MZ, Paudyal<br />

BK. 1998. Initial <strong>growth</strong> performance <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>in</strong>digenous<br />

timber species by open <str<strong>on</strong>g>plant<strong>in</strong>g</str<strong>on</strong>g> technique <strong>on</strong><br />

degraded forest l<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>. Malaysian Forester 61, 232–<br />

242.<br />

Webb MJ, Reddell P, Hamblet<strong>on</strong> A, Robs<strong>on</strong> K.<br />

2000. Growth resp<strong>on</strong>se <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> four tropical plantati<strong>on</strong><br />

timber species to <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g phosphorus supply <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

assessment <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> phosphorus requirements us<strong>in</strong>g foliar<br />

analysis. New Forests 20, 193–211.<br />

Zohary M. 1972. Flora Palaest<strong>in</strong>a: The ethnobotany<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Christ's Thorn Jujube (<strong>Ziziphus</strong> <strong>sp<strong>in</strong>a</strong>-<strong>chr</strong><strong>isti</strong>) <strong>in</strong><br />

Israel. The Israel Academy <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Science <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

Humanities, 307–308.<br />

71 | Ahmadi et al.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!