03.10.2014 Views

Quality Progress - American Society for Quality

Quality Progress - American Society for Quality

Quality Progress - American Society for Quality

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

know the answer to that. So knowing this, would basing the top-level management<br />

system on a QMS yield a different result? Again, I assert that if the mindset has not<br />

changed, the results will not change. As a colleague of mine noted, the best a QMS like<br />

ISO will be able to achieve is ?localized optima? a danger in itself. I couldn?t have said<br />

it any better. Personally, I didn?t find much value in Mr. Karaszewski?s article. The<br />

article only serves to conclude what we already know: <strong>Quality</strong> Management is an<br />

important element and can improve competitive as well as economic position of an<br />

organization. This is true whether or not it is viewed as the top level or support<br />

management system or if the organization is large or small. For me, an organization?s<br />

competitive position is reliant on vision (including values and a future state), mindset<br />

(philosophy and culture), and leadership. A QMS can help to support these and is a<br />

necessary tool, but in no way is this supplemental to them.<br />

Regards,<br />

Kevin<br />

17029 Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Letter: Thoughts on Lack of Training in Latest <strong>Quality</strong><br />

Systems?<br />

Robert Nix<br />

Sep-18-03<br />

This dead horse has been beaten so badly it has turned into glue, and now we're all stuck<br />

here!!!<br />

|17026 Re: Re: Re: Re: Letter: Thoughts on Lack of Training in Latest <strong>Quality</strong><br />

Systems?<br />

William Pflanz<br />

Sep-18-03<br />

Since the horse is still not dead, I will take another whack. Wes, since you are<br />

acknowledging there are basically lazy individuals out there, I would argue that the first<br />

pass on looking at resumes would be <strong>for</strong> certifications. Those that have them get in the<br />

second look pile, those that don't get into the round file. Now if a hiring manager was<br />

smart he would look at the actual experiences that the person has. If the only way you<br />

can get them to look at your portfolio of work is to have some letters after your name<br />

then that is the game. If you "buy" a black belt and get a Six Sigma job than you will<br />

either succeed because they won't have a clue of what you do or you will fail because you<br />

don't have a clue and they will realize it. In either case someone loses. Even the ASQ<br />

certifications are meaningless without the right knowledge, experience and skills. During<br />

tough times it is still better to have a certification than not since it opens doors. Again, I<br />

would suggest you look at some of the ASQ literature and other Six Sigma books. I<br />

believe you will find a lot of commonality. Just throw out the hype and the buzzwords<br />

and use the rest.<br />

Bill Pflanz<br />

BS, MBA, CQM, CQA and CSSBB??

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!