19.10.2014 Views

Relevance of - United Nations Economic Commission for Africa

Relevance of - United Nations Economic Commission for Africa

Relevance of - United Nations Economic Commission for Africa

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Preface<br />

A number <strong>of</strong> studies have affirmed the resiliency, legitimacy and relevance <strong>of</strong> <strong>Africa</strong>n<br />

traditional institutions in the socio-cultural, economic and political lives <strong>of</strong> <strong>Africa</strong>ns,<br />

particularly in the rural areas. Juxtaposed with this is the sometimes parallel “modern<br />

State”, vested with enormous authority in rule making, application, adjudication and<br />

en<strong>for</strong>cement. As <strong>Africa</strong> seeks to build and strengthen capable States, there is the need<br />

to recognize and address this “duality” fully. This is principally borne out by a growing<br />

recognition that capable democratic States must be grounded on indigenous social values<br />

and contexts, while adapting to changing realities. This will require among other actions,<br />

aligning and harmonizing traditional governance institutions with the modern State.<br />

The roles that traditional authorities can play in the process <strong>of</strong> good governance can<br />

broadly be separated into three categories: first, their advisory role to government, as<br />

well as their participatory role in the administration <strong>of</strong> regions and districts; second, their<br />

developmental role, complementing government’s ef<strong>for</strong>ts in mobilizing the population<br />

<strong>for</strong> the implementation <strong>of</strong> development projects, sensitizing them on health issues such<br />

as HIV/AIDS, promoting education, encouraging economic enterprises, inspiring respect<br />

<strong>for</strong> the law and urging participation in the electoral process; and third, their role in conflict<br />

resolution, an area where traditional leaders across <strong>Africa</strong> have already demonstrated<br />

success.<br />

The question there<strong>for</strong>e is not whether the traditional and “modern” systems <strong>of</strong> governance<br />

are competing against each other but how to integrate the two systems more effectively in<br />

order to better serve citizens in terms <strong>of</strong> representation and participation, service delivery,<br />

social and health standards and access to justice.<br />

It is against this background that in October 2004, the <strong>Economic</strong> <strong>Commission</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Africa</strong><br />

(ECA) organized the fourth <strong>Africa</strong>n Development Forum (ADF-IV), which focused on<br />

the theme, “Governance <strong>for</strong> a Progressing <strong>Africa</strong>”. In the ADF-IV agenda <strong>for</strong> action,<br />

ECA was requested to develop a project to map out traditional systems <strong>of</strong> governance,<br />

including their consensual decision-making models, as part <strong>of</strong> a broader ef<strong>for</strong>t to better<br />

define and advocate their role in achieving good governance in <strong>Africa</strong>. This concept<br />

paper addresses these issues and outlines the theoretical framework <strong>for</strong> the dynamics<br />

that enable traditional governance institutions to play a more “developmentalist” role in<br />

modern governance systems.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!