LTP 2012-2022 - Introduction - Hurunui District Council
t Long Term Plan 2012-2022
Hurunui Community Long Term Plan - 2012-2022
www.hurunui.govt.nz
66 Carters Road
PO Box 13
Amberley 7441
Phone: 03 314 8816
Fax: 03 314 9181
email: info@hurunui.govt.nz
web: hurunui.govt.nz
Front Cover - Overlooking the Waiau Township from the Leader Road.
2
Hurunui Community Long Term Plan 2012 - 2022
Contents
Introduction
5 Welcome from the Mayor and CEO
9 About the Plan
11 How Your Rates are Spent
12 Key Issues
20 Financial Strategy
32 Statement Concerning Balancing
of the Budget
34 Community Outcomes
36 Aligning Our Long Term Plan with the
Government’s Drivers for Economic
Growth
40 Water Management
43 Sustainability
Township Profiles
46 Hurunui District Profile
52 Amberley Ward Profile
55 Amuri-Hurunui Ward Profile
60 Cheviot Ward Profile
62 Glenmark Ward Profile
65 Hanmer Springs Ward Profile
Council Activities
69 Introduction
71 Water Supply
79 Sewerage
84 Roads and Footpaths
90 Stormwater and Drainage
94 Community Services and Facilities
96 Community Services
102 Property
108 Reserves
112 Environment and Safety
115 Emergency Services
119 Resource Management
122 Compliance and Regulatory
Functions
126 Waste Minimisation
130 District Promotion
135 Hanmer Springs Thermal Pools and Spa
141 Governance
Financial Information
146 Financial Introduction
148 Forecasting Assumptions
153 Statement of Accounting Policies
171 Funding Impact Statement (and Rates
System)
182 Rates System
193 Reserve Funds
198 Council Controlled Organisations
Council Policies
200 Policy Introduction
201 Development Contributions Policy
217 External Liability Management Policy
219 Investment Policy
221 Rates Remission for Biodiversity
Policy
222 Rates Remissions on Land Affected by
Natural Calamity Policy
223 Reserves Funding Policy
224 Revenue and Funding Policy
251 Significance Policy
258 Treasury Risk Management Policy
262 Internal Financing Policy
Appendices
265 Representatives of our District
266 Waste Management and
Minimisation Plan Summary
268 Hurunui Waiau Zone Implimentation
Programme
270 Water and Sanitary Services
Assessment Summary
272 Levels of Service Water and Sewer
275 Rates: Sample Properties
281 Independent Auditor’s Report
3
www.hurunui.govt.nz
Introduction
5 Welcome from the Mayor and CEO
9 About the Plan
11 How Your Rates are Spent
12 Key Issues
20 Financial Strategy
32 Statement Concerning Balancing
of the Budget
34 Community Outcomes
36 Aligning Our Long Term Plan with the
Government’s Drivers for Economic
Growth
40 Water Management
43 Sustainability
4
Hurunui Community Long Term Plan 2012 - 2022
Winton Dalley
Mayor
Welcome from the Mayor and CEO
Andrew Dalziel
Chief Executive Officer
Hello everyone and welcome to Council’s Long Term Plan 2012
- 2022. In our introduction, we summarise some important
themes and points to help you gain an overall understanding of
what is in this ten year plan and what it may mean for you and
for our district.
We review our 10 year plan every three years and in the two
in-between years, we prepare Annual Plans based on the 10
year plan. We do our best to plan appropriately for the coming
years, but things will and do happen that are beyond our control,
hence the need for regular reviews. For example, no amount
of planning would have prepared us totally for the devastating
earthquakes that hit the Canterbury Region. Although the
Hurunui District suffered comparably less direct damage than
Christchurch City, Waimakariri and Selwyn Districts, the impact
on us has still been huge and had a major influence on this
plan. When we last reviewed our plan three years ago, we were
optimistic about the economy picking up more quickly than it
has done. We were optimistic that our district would grow
at a much faster pace than has actually been the case. Our
recent updated population estimate of 11,330 residents shows
low growth. With the census being postponed because of the
earthquakes, we will not be able to confirm our population
and district statistics until the results of the 2013 census are
released in 2014.
One of the most challenging aspects of planning is finding the
right balance between delivering expected levels of service at an
affordable cost. We invited you, our residents and ratepayers, to
submit on our proposals in March and April 2012. About 130
of you did just this and as a result of your input, we were able
to confirm many of our proposals and include other matters
we had not considered previously. We constantly challenge
ourselves over what is reasonable, what is sustainable into the
5
www.hurunui.govt.nz
future, who should pay, and how to meet the expectations of
our communities. The Government has expressed concern
over high rating increases and expects councils to be restrained.
Whereas we agree, unfortunately dramatic increases in our
insurance costs, the new legislative requirement to meet New
Zealand drinking water standards, and funding sewer and
stormwater improvements, mean that we too have higher rating
increases than we would have preferred.
As a result of the Council’s decisions after considering public
submissions, the increase in the 2012/2013 year has reduced
from 6.94% (what we said in the draft Long Term Plan), down to
5.83%. The downside is the flow on effect to the 2013/2014 and
2014/2015 years’ rates which will increase from 4.80% to 5.77%
for 2013/2014 and from 4.62% to 5.37% in the 2014/2015 year.
The primary causes for the increases in our rate projections
can be attributed to the following items, all of which are further
explained in the ‘key issues’ section of this plan.
• Insurance has significantly risen as a direct result of the
Canterbury earthquakes and other natural disasters,
such as the Queensland floods. We have traditionally had
comprehensive insurance cover, and we have budgeted to
continue to do so.
• We face huge capital outlay to become compliant with the
legislated New Zealand Drinking Water Standards. The
good news is that we will no longer have any of our water
schemes on permanent boil water notices; but it comes at a
price. We will be treating the water of our at-risk drinking
water intakes in the 2012/13 year. This will enable us to be
compliant in the short term but this is only an interim step.
In the long term we will need to upgrade our schemes by
2027. To make this affordable, we will commence rating
for the estimated $14 million (in today’s dollars), in the
2015/2016 year.
• In recent years, we have incurred significant costs in
upgrading some of our water supplies, sewer schemes and
stormwater systems. The work undertaken has resulted
in increased debt for those activities and we are at a stage
where the interest and debt repayments need to be made
and these have to be funded through rates.
There are a number of other aspects that influenced the
development of this Plan. We were guided by our proposed new
vision of Community partnership in growth and wellbeing,
as well as our core principles:
• Focus on core services
• Financial responsibility and affordability
• Continuous improvement in service to everyone in our
district
• Facilitate appropriate growth in the district
We have confirmed this new vision through the long term
plan consultation process. It builds upon our previous vision
which was based on a ‘wellness’ concept (Hurunui Wellness:
“In Hurunui, we live the lives the rest of the world would
love to live”). We wanted to further define it and convey that
everything we do, we do in partnership with our communities.
With your support for our plan and the services, infrastructure
and facilities we provide and you pay for, we have confidence
that we will be meeting the aspirations or expectations of our
communities, which contribute to wellness and wellbeing.
Important contributors to this Plan have been the many people
in our district who are members of our boards and committees.
In particular, we have taken into account the views of the Ward
Committees and the Hanmer Springs Community Board on the
submissions received affecting each of their respective wards.
These groups, having been chosen by their local communities,
provide valuable insight into what is considered important
locally.
All submissions were considered in the context of affordability,
priorities for the district and Government’s new bill, ‘Better
Local Government’. This bill, expected to be passed around
September 2012, aims to provide better clarity about council’s
roles, stronger governance, improved efficiency and more
responsible fiscal management. The Government is concerned
about increased public spending and debt levels and is requiring
both central and local government to improve the efficiency
of delivering public services and take a prudent approach to
public debt. The new bill proposes that councils will have a new
purpose -“providing good quality local infrastructure, public
services and regulatory functions at the least possible cost to
households and business”. This will replace the current purpose
which references a responsibility to the social, economic,
environmental and cultural well-being of communities. In
addition, the Government is proposing to introduce legislation
around fiscal responsibility to limit council expenditure growth
to no faster than inflation and population growth. A strong
Hurunui 10-Year Timeline
2012/13
Representation Review
Nine New Miox Water Treatment Installations
Targeted Tourism Rate and
District Promotion Review
Earthquake Prone Building Assessments
Cheviot Library Relocation
Local Government Elections
Earthquake Prone Building Assessments
Review of the District Plan completed
2013/14
2014/15
Central Government Elections
Earthquake Prone Building Assessments
Hanmer Springs Community Hall Extension
Long Term Plan Review
Drinking Water upgrade
Hanmer Springs Sewerage Treatment
Plant Upgrade
Hanmer Springs Sports Stadium
2015/16
2016/17
Local Government Elections
Cheviot Medical Centre Upgrade or
Rebuild
6
Hurunui Community Long Term Plan 2012 - 2022
message coming through is for council’s to stick to core business.
All this has an impact on what we decided to provide for now
and into the future.
Thanks to your support, we have confirmed a number of the
proposals that we put to you. For example, we will proceed
with our intent to review our method of rating for tourism
and general district promotion in 2012/13. This is one example
of where your views and suggestions have confirmed that it is
timely to review our rating model. You also told us that you
agree with our plan to assess earthquake prone commercial
and public buildings in the district sooner rather than later in
the interests of public safety, despite not being required to do
this. Likewise, through your submissions, we have been able to
confirm our direction to provide funds for legal advice relating
to resource consents, district plan changes and policy matters;
and to do our best to maintain our roading levels of service
despite there being less funding available.
Many of you submitted on local issues affecting your areas.
Through hearing from you, we have been able to confirm our
intent to: provide for a new or upgraded medical centre in
Cheviot in 2016/17; move the Cheviot community library from
the school into the Cheviot service centre in 2012/13; continue
to work with you to finalise any proposal for a swimming pool
in Amberley; enhance a number of facilities in Hanmer Springs
(eg: the sports ground and community hall); and continue our
work to secure access to the Hanmer Heritage Forest. We
also confirmed our proposal to fund the Hanmer Springs
Community Board through Hanmer Springs ratepayers (rather
than district wide rates). Few people mentioned the proposal
to build a public toilet in Rotherham in 2017/18 funded through
the district rate, but we agreed to retain the budget for this in
the meantime but will retest the need for this again in 2015
before going ahead. More information about all of these items is
in the ‘Key Issues’ section of this plan.
We received a large number of submissions about access to
the Hurunui lakes (Lake Sumner, Lake Taylor and Loch Katrine).
Although this was not something we highlighted in our draft
Plan, it was clearly of importance to many of you. Through the
submission process, we were able to confirm our intention to
continue working with other groups as well as the Department
of Conservation to help resolve the common issues affecting
access. Potentially this is a complex situation requiring not only
significant funding, but resolving issues over public and private
land ownership.
We have included into this plan, a number of other items that
came to our attention through submissions, such as: a $5,000
contribution toward the roof repair of the Balcairn Public Hall
(via Amberley amenity rates); to continue contributing $5,000
per annum via a district wide rate toward the Sport NZ Rural
Travel Fund; approved expenditure of $45,000 toward the septic
tank replacement at the Gore Bay Camp; to spend $80,000
over two years to upgrade or replace the Cheviot Hills Reserve
public toilets; to extend our Smokefree Policy to include more
outdoor areas gradually and within existing budgets; to spend
$5,000 to promote responsible dog owner behaviour later this
year; to adjust our wording in our Waste Minimisation Plan to
show our desire to work toward zero waste to landfill.
In light of the restrictions we face, we also had to say ‘no’ to a
lot of people who requested money or initiatives that required
money. Whereas these submissions had merit, they were
either out of our scope or unaffordable, particularly given the
Government’s bill, or we did not consider them to be essential
at this time. Some of the requests we declined included: $25,000
toward the Wellbeing North Canterbury’s manager’s salary;
assistance toward the aquisition of a doctor’s house in Hanmer
Springs; $7,500 per year to develop a sister city relationship
with Honghu City, China; employing a full time forest ranger
in Hanmer Springs; introducing a $5 bounty fee for possums;
contributing $25,000 toward a men’s support programme to
reduce suicide; introducing an eagle breeding programme.
As a result of the continuing downturn in the tourism industry in
Canterbury, the Council has reforecast the revenue projections
for the Hanmer Springs Thermal Pools & Spa. As a result, the
revenue derived from the Thermal Pools operation was reduced
from $6.671 million to 6.4 million. There was also a reduction
of $65,000 in surplus forecast from the cafe operation and a
$31,000 reduction in other revenue sources.
With the benefit of some quantity survey estimates, there was
a reassessment of the capital expenditure for the changing
rooms and administration building for the pools operation from
$1 million to $2 million.
For the first three years, the reduction in the revenue has
resulted in the Council spending more on reserve - based
expenditure than it is earning from the surpluses derived from
the Hanmer Springs Thermal Pools & Spa. but the Council is
comfortable in funding this from utilising some of the existing
reserve balance that has been generated by the surpluses in the
past.
CentralGovernment Elections
Rotherham public Toilets
Local Government Elections
2018/19
2017/18 2019/20
Representation Review
Long Term Plan Review
2020/21
Central Government Elections
Long Term Plan Review
2021/22
7
www.hurunui.govt.nz
How Council services are rated can be contentious and difficult
to understand. We use a variety of different rating methods,
for example, we rate some services across the district and
others across wards only. We also fund some activities through
targeting particular users (as how tourism is currently funded).
The Financial Strategy and Revenue and Funding Policy in this
Plan both provide information to give a better understanding of
how activities and service are funded and the rationale behind
that. The Financial Strategy is a new requirement under the
Local Government Act.
Full details of the rate movements year by year are shown in
the Funding Impact Statement in this Plan. We must emphasise
that amenity and targeted rate increases vary considerably
across the district according to the projects planned for each
ward. For example, there are differing levels of expenditure for
upgrades and debt repayment for each water scheme; there is a
new medical centre proposed for Cheviot; a number of projects
planned for Hanmer Springs; and so on. The sample property
analysis in the appendices at the back of this document, gives a
picture of the impact of rates for the 2012/2013 year for the
various rating areas. You can find out what the rates are for your
property for any year up to year 10 of this plan by contacting us
directly or going onto our website.
Despite the increase to our rates, we have taken a conservative
approach to this plan. We assure you, as ratepayers and
residents, that we have applied our best efforts to develop this
long term plan diligently, to create what we believe is a robust
and comprehensive strategic framework for Hurunui for the
next ten years, notwithstanding the challenges and uncertainties
we all presently face. Finally, a sincere thank you to those of
you who took the time to write a submission to the draft plan
and to those of you who presented their submission personally
to the Council. As a result of your efforts, you have helped us
determine this final long term plan.
8
About the Plan
Introduction
The Local Government Act 2002 requires all councils to have a
Long Term Plan (LTP). The Hurunui Community Long Term Plan
is our LTP.
This plan is the combined effort of Council and the district’s
community. Many of our sub committees have been actively
involved in preparing plans for their townships and wards
and their efforts are reflected in this plan. So are the views
of the many individuals who told us what they consider to be
important for the future of our district. Many people have put
considerable numbers of hours into the development of this
plan. The plan covers a 10 year period from 1 July 2012 to 30
June 2022.
Updating the Plan
This plan will be updated and revised every 3 years. The plan is
one of the main ways you can influence what the Council does
every 3 years.
In the years between each Hurunui Community Long Term Plan
review, we will prepare an Annual Plan which will focus on the
budgets of the particular year of publication. This information
will be taken from the Hurunui Community Long Term Plan.
Guide to the Plan
The following is a brief guide about the information contained in
each section of the plan.
Introduction - This section sets out key issues that we want
to bring to your attention and want to hear from you on.
This section also contains a new and important piece of this
plan – the Financial Strategy. This will tell you about our main
financial challenges and what our financial position is – how we
can afford the services that we provide and how we intend to
continue to fund these. You will find out how your rates are
spent, and the community outcomes we consider important to
our communities.
Township Profiles – Here you will find key information about
the district each ward and community rating area, including,
demographic data, key priorities and amenity rates.
Hurunui Community Long Term Plan 2012 - 2022
well as financial statements required by law.
Policies – Provides the key Council policies (including financial
policies and principles) to assist with decision making and
planning.
Appendices – This section contains various summaries of
strategies and plans that are important to include to provide
more context and information relating to our services.
Monitoring the Plan
At the end of each financial year, we complete an Annual Report.
In this report, we will state how we have performed against
what we said we were going to do in this plan and at what cost.
Changing the Plan
If any significant changes need to be made to the Hurunui
Community Long Term Plan before it is formally revised at
each three year interval, the proposed changes will be publicly
notified to give anyone affected an opportunity to have their say
before Council decides whether or not to make the proposed
changes.
Our ‘Significance Policy’ guides us in determining the importance
of an issue and the possible impact on the community. When an
issue is deemed significant, we will consider how best to consult
you. The significance policy is included in the Policy section.
The Plan Does Not Include GST
When reading this document, please be aware that all of
the figures quoted in the LTP are GST exclusive except the
‘Statement of Rating Policy’ and the ‘Development Contributions
Policy’.
Inflation
The plan has been developed on an inflation adjusted basis
to comply with accounting standards. Details of the inflation
assumptions used are outlined on page 148.
Council Activities – Gives useful information for each Council
activity such as water, roading, community services etc, and
financial information for each activity, as well as any major
priorities or projects planned.
Financial Overview – This section is where financial
information is summarised. It gives the 10 year capital
expenditure programme and forecast financial statements as
9
www.hurunui.govt.nz
Relationship Between the Hurunui Community Long Term Plan and Other Documents
Annual
Report
The LTP integrates strategies, policies and activities in the
context of identified community outcomes, and in a way that
Knowing what the Council
has achieved
Community
Outcomes
Knowing what is important for the
future wellbeing of our community
Knowing how it s going
to be paid for
Annual
Plan
Knowing what the Council is doing to
meet community outcomes
Hurunui Community
Long Term Plan
promotes public accountability and integrated decision making.
All planning that we do lines up with the LTP, as well as other plans,
such as our asset management plans and waste management
plans, and linking to other non-mandatory strategies such as
the Hurunui Community Road Safety Strategy.
The activities set out in this LTP contribute to the achievement
of the community outcomes, and promote the District’s social,
cultural, economic or environmental wellbeing.
10
How Your Rates are Spent
The Council’s Projected Income and Expenditure for 2012 / 2013
Hurunui Community Long Term Plan 2012 - 2022
Operating Income of $30.1 million for the 2012/2013 year
Hanmer Springs
Thermal Pools and
Spa
32%
Other Income
10%
General Rates
19%
Targeted Rates for
Water Supplies
2%
NZTA Subsidies and
Other Grants
11%
Development
Contributions
1%
Targeted Rates for
Other Services
25%
Operating Expenditure of $30.3 million for the 2012/2013 year
Governance
2%
Corporate Services
16%
Water Supplies
11%
Sewerage
2%
Stormwater and
Drainage
0%
Roads and Footpaths
19%
Hanmer Springs
Thermal Pools and
Spa
25%
District Promotion
2%
Waste Minimisation
6%
Compliance and
Regulations
2%
Community
Services
Property
3%
4%
Reserves
4%
Emergency Services
1%
Resource
Management
3%
Capital Expenditure of $10.8 million for the 2012/2013 year
Hanmer Springs
Thermal Pools and
Spa
25%
Corporate Services
5%
Water Supplies
19%
Sewerage
8%
Emergency Services
2%
Reserves
2%
Property
1%
Community Services
1%
Stormwater and
Drainage
3%
Roads and Footpaths
34%
11
www.hurunui.govt.nz
Key Issues
Introduction
In the draft long term plan, we highlighted a number of issues
that we wanted your view on before we came to a final decision.
We received many submissions on these topics and this section
sets out the decisions we made about each issue. Table 2 at the
end of this section shows how each item will be funded.
Drinking Water Standards
In recent years, the Government has placed strong emphasis
on the quality and availability of drinking water for all New
Zealanders, irrespective of where they live. The standard of
drinking water throughout the country has been variable and
in many places, particularly rural New Zealand, below standard.
New Zealand drinking water standards have been developed and
recently revised, and they require all councils to make significant
advancements to meet these standards.
Most of the drinking water in the Hurunui District fails to meet
the new drinking water standards and currently, eight of our
communities are advised to boil water before they drink it.
The drinking water standards are concerned mainly with three
specific areas: water quality; how we will know our drinking
water is meeting the standards; and what we will do about it if it
doesn’t. There are substantial fines for not complying with the
new legislation – up to $200,000 for an offence and $10,000 for
each day of continued non-compliance for each of our 22 water
supply sources.
In addition, the Health (Drinking Water) Amendment Act 2007
requires all drinking water suppliers to have Public Health Risk
Management Plans (PHRMP) in place outlining how to safely
manage drinking water. This is significant because we have a duty
to ensure the drinking water we supply is safe to drink. (The
same applies for all other councils and private suppliers.) In our
district, we have 22 water supply sources and each needs its own
PHRMP to be completed at various times between July 2014 and
July 2016, depending on how each water supply is defined (based
on the number of customers each supply serves).
These requirements are financially challenging. We have no
option but to plan toward compliance, but the cost to do so is
immense. To upgrade our water systems to be fully compliant,
we have estimated that it will cost $14 million in today’s dollars,
and a further $484,000 per year solely to operate the upgraded
schemes. This caused us a great deal of concern and we have
raised the affordability issue for a small, rural council such as
ours to meet these considerable costs with the Ministry of
Health. We have come to a compromise to achieve drinking
water compliance no later than ten years after the final approval
date for each respective PHRMP, which will be between 2024
and 2027. The compromise involves two main phases to manage
the affordability issue.
First Phase
As a minimum, we will provide drinking water to our consumers
that is bacteriologically free and is safe to consume. To do this
we will need to lift all permanent boil water notices on our
current schemes. This will be achieved using improved interim
technologies to our at risk water intakes that will subsequently
meet these desired outcomes.
Therefore the first phase proposes nine new Miox installations
costing $758,000 for the 2012/2013 financial year. The at risk
drinking water intakes are: (1) Ashley Rural; (2) Waiau Rural;
(3) Cheviot – Parnassus; (4) Cheviot – Blythe; (5) Cheviot –
Kaiwara; (6) Hurunui Rural – No.1; (7) Hurunui Rural – Peaks;
(8) Hurunui Rural – Lower Waitohi; and (9) Waipara Township.
The existing MIOX plant serving the targeted Cheviot and Gore
Bay Township community will be moved to the intake to serve
and improve the full water reticulation pipeline.
This capital costs and on-going operational costs involved
is to be met by a special targeted rate for each dwelling that
benefits from the water treatment. It is estimated to cost
affected ratepayers approximately $100 per year to fund both
the operational and capital costs. This will affect an estimated
1,463 dwellings in total. We plan to stage the implementation
of this funding over three years, therefore those ratepayers will
be charged $33 in 2012/13, $66 in 2013/14, and the full $100
in 2014/15. The exception to this special targeted rate is for
the consumers on the Ashley Rural water scheme. The cost of
their Miox installation will be met solely by those properties
connected to that scheme as part of their standard, unit rate.
This is because the majority of the consumers of the Ashley
Rural Water Supply reside outside the Hurunui District and
already have a special rating arrangement in place.
All other district-wide intakes are either safe deep source
water or have not had any e-coli non-compliance over the last
three years, thus perceived as safe at present. These will be
continuously monitored for further improvement if the ‘safestatus’
changes. This approach will unfortunately not eliminate
the issue of temporary boil water notices from time to time,
when tested and triggered e-coli contamination is related to
post-intake drinking-water pipeline breaches, e.g. pipe breaks,
etc.
Second Phase
The second phase involves the upgrading of the water schemes
to full compliance, and will mean the end to the Miox treatments.
The capital cost in today’s money is $14 million, and we plan to
implement this between 2024 and 2027. To manage the cost,
this will be funded through a district wide general rate. This
is different to how we currently fund water supplies, which
is through targeted rates for individual schemes. We do not
believe the targeted method of funding is possible or a fair way of
12
Hurunui Community Long Term Plan 2012 - 2022
funding for any of our ratepayers to upgrade our drinking water
to legislated standards. There are simply too few people on the
smaller community schemes in particular, to be able to pay for
these upgrades. By funding via a district wide rate, the cost is
spread across all ratepayers, hence making it more affordable
and achievable over all. This does mean that everyone pays,
whether or not on a private water scheme.
Although the capital works required won’t start being built until
2024, we are going to start rating from 2015/16 to build up
funds which will offset the full capital cost when it is necessary.
The cost of this will be $41 per property and this rate fund,
along with accumulating interest, should provide a fund of
approximately $3 million to assist with meeting the capital cost.
The method by which the balance of the capital work and the
on-going operational costs will be met, will be refined over time.
This will again be a topic for discussion when we review our
long term plan again in 2015.
Sewer Improvements
Disposal of treated wastewater direct to waterways has been
a common practice nationally in the past, but this approach is
no longer considered sustainable or environmentally acceptable.
In our district, we have seven wastewater treatment plants
using oxidation ponds as an effluent treatment process. These
treatment plants are located at Amberley, Hanmer Springs,
Cheviot, Greta Valley, Motunau Beach, Hawarden and Waikari.
We are going to do more work to our Hanmer Springs
wastewater treatment plant so that the treated wastewater
is disposed onto land instead of into the waterway (which
is a resource consent condition). We are investigating the
best options available to us in Hanmer Springs for both land
acquisition and improved effluent treatment. The cost for this
sewer land disposal work is $1,200,000 factored into year
2015/16 and will be paid for by the Hanmer Springs Ward
ratepayers. Other planned work includes improving dissolved
oxygen levels in the treatment ponds to eliminate issues such
as odour and reduced treatment efficiencies. For this work we
plan to spend $220,000 in 2012/13.
Cheviot’s wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) disposal
system is spray irrigation to land or onto the overland flow area
when the land disposal area is saturated. We are investigating
possible long-term treatment options (long term capacities; soil
permeability and content analysis; seasonal effects, flow/water
quality/ecology of Crystal Brook and neighbouring groundwater
quality assessments) associated with treatment and disposal of
wastewater from the Cheviot WWTP. We will work with the
Canterbury Regional Council to agree on the best solution
going forward in 2012/13. This plant’s resource consent expires
11 September 2014, when the Canterbury Regional Council will
decide if improvements are required to renew this resource
consent. No disposal to waterways is allowed. We are planning
to pay for this through usual operating costs at no increase to
ratepayers.
Amberley and Waikari have existing treated effluent disposal
to land, with Greta Valley and Motunau Beach using a primary
option of disposal to land and secondary option to waterway
when the land is saturated, for example, seasonal wet weather
conditions. Hawarden’s system is disposal to waterway until
changes are effected through the resource consent renewal,
which will be in 2027 or subject to any new requirements under
the Natural Resources Regional Plan (NRRP) review currently
underway at Canterbury Regional Council. We will consider
more natural methods of disposal, such as wetland filtration
if proven feasible and cost effective. All systems are closely
monitored and audited by the Canterbury Regional Council for
compliance with stringent consent conditions to protect and
enhance the environment surrounding these treatment plants.
Stormwater Improvements
We have been working on a programme of stormwater
improvements to the Amberley township and Amberley
and Leithfield Beach communities since 2008 when we had
significant property flooding following high rainfall events.
The improvements have taken a disappointingly long time
to implement due to the resource consent process and
Environment Court hearings process. So far, only two major
physical works have been completed – the flood diversion
from Dock Creek along Lawcocks Road, and a piped outfall of
the Leithfield Outfall Drain to the sea. By the time this plan
is finalised, the flood diversion works in the Amberley swamp
area (to include an outlet culvert under Stanton Rd) and the
area from Dry Gully to the Mimimoto Lagoon will have been
completed, as well as the new pipelines in Amberley.
A flood flow diversion from the Eastern Drain across to the
Amberley North lagoon is planned in 2012/13 to complete the
flood mitigation works. Detailed design and land ownership
issues still have to be finalised. $294,000 has been budgeted for
this work (to do detention ponds and upgrades), with a further
$84,000 in the 2016/17 budget for Chamberlain Park filters.
This will be funded through a special rate across Amberley Ward.
Applications for global consents to discharge stormwater from
the Amberley urban area and new residential developments in
Hanmer Springs will be made in the 2012/13 year. Both of these
will be funded via a separate rate for the Amberley Wards and
Hanmer Springs as well as development contributions.
We will be recruiting a stormwater engineer in 2013/2014 to
manage this area of our work. This engineer will be responsible
for developing district-wide stormwater catchment and
management plans, and undertake the range of tasks required to
ensure we have effective stormwater systems in place, inclusive
of appropriate maintenance regimes.
13
www.hurunui.govt.nz
Targeted Tourism Rate and District Promotion
Our tourism promotion and limited district promotion is
currently carried out through one of our council committees
called the ‘Hurunui Tourism Board’. The way we fund this is
through a ‘targeted tourism rate’ which has had its share of
controversy. Those who pay are ratepayers and businesses
who are deemed to be involved directly in the visitor / tourism
sector. From this sector, we collect $286,000 annually with an
additional contribution of $45,000 from the Hanmer Springs
Thermal Pools and Spa. We are concerned that we don’t yet
have the funding model right and intend to review the targeted
tourism rate and explore ways of funding a broader concept of
‘district promotion’ or tourism in a different way.
We think we can better promote the district in all aspects by
adopting a broader approach, rather than just focusing only on
tourism. The issue of who benefits from district promotion and
who should fund it is a challenging issue and we want to develop
a better way to do this. We will continue with the targeted
tourism rate up to the end of the 2012/13 (and have included it
throughout the 10 year budget for the meantime), to allow time
for a viable alternative to be developed.
Having taking into account the submissions we received on
this topic, we will look at how we might phase out the current
targeted tourism rate in 2013/14 when a new model would take
effect. We will begin working on this before the end of 2012
around what a possible alternative model would look like. This
will include looking at how to improve our promotion of the
district. At this stage, we are unsure whether this new model
will retain the Hurunui Tourism Board, or see the development
of a new committee or board. We will continue with what we
have in the meantime until an alternative is found.
Cost of Insurance
It will be no surprise to anyone that the cost of insurance has
significantly risen as a result of the Canterbury earthquakes. The
damage to Christchurch in particular and the resulting insurance
liability has been unprecedented anywhere in the world before.
It is now well known that globally, the insurance industry had
to have a major rethink of how it could continue to provide
insurance cover and still be affordable. Given that the Hurunui
District is tectonically active and we are periodically subjected
to floods, rural fires, snow and winds, we have traditionally been
well insured and cover our infrastructure and liabilities.
Up until July 2011, the cost of our insurance was $212,858 per
annum. This is the total bill for all Council infrastructure and
liabilities, including the Hanmer Springs Thermal Pools and Spa.
Our new insurance arrangement now costs $564,414 per year
to cover the same infrastructure as we did in the past. This
significantly contributes to our 5.84% increase in rates as the
approximate increase in insurance across the organisation of
$350,000 alone represents 2.73% of the total rates that were
struck in the 2011/2012 year.
The process for renewing the insurance policies is likely to be
more stringent in the future and there could be the possibility
that some of our assets may not be covered by insurance, as has
been the case for Christchurch City and Waimakariri District
Councils for the 2011/2012 year. It is our intention to remain
fully insured at all times.
Earthquake Strengthening
We have completed the first stage of a desktop review of
potential earthquake prone buildings in the Hurunui district for
all council owned buildings and are now currently carrying out
the second stage which will include all privately owned buildings.
The desk top review should be completed by December 2012.
The completed desk top study will show how many commercial
and public buildings in the district are suspected to be earthquake
prone. At this early stage we have provisional numbers of 368
commercial buildings, both privately and council owned. 150
are estimated to be built before 1976, and up to 90 of them are
suspected to be earthquake prone, and therefore could pose a
potential danger to the public. We own 68 of the commercial
and public buildings built before 1976 and of these, we have
confirmed 48 that are included on the first stage of the desktop
study. Engineers are currently carrying out an initial evaluation
procedure (IEP) of some of these buildings which will confirm
whether or not they are earthquake prone.
The desk top review will only provide information about
buildings without looking at them in a detailed structural
manner. There are certain types of building that are considered
to be more earthquake prone than others and it is these that
we will be focusing on. They are usually unreinforced concrete
and masonry buildings, but there may be others that are also at
risk. The assessment process will be carried out in accordance
with the Earthquake Engineering Society of New Zealand
guidelines. We will need qualified engineers to actually assess
each of these buildings to confirm to us whether or not the
building is potentially earthquake prone and that owners should
be advised. To do this IEP assessment (without any actual repairs
or remedial work), it will cost approximately $69,000 to do
90 earthquake prone buildings spread evenly over the first 3
years of the Long Term Plan. We are taking an active approach
to identify and upgrade buildings at risk following the lessons
learned from the Christchurch earthquakes. Obviously, we do
not want a repeat of that disaster in our district.
Once we have the IEP assessments from the independent
engineers, we will then be able to inform property owners that
we suspect that their building is earthquake prone. They will
then be required to carry out a detailed engineering assessment
to show how to remedy any risks to the building. Because most
of the buildings are council owned, the same will apply to us. At
this stage, we have not made a budget provision for any actual
strengthening, repair or demolition work. We plan to decide
on this once we have the information on a case by case basis.
14
Hurunui Community Long Term Plan 2012 - 2022
Other owners of buildings will need to do the same once they
have information provided to them. There is of course, nothing
stopping anyone getting their own independent assessment at
their own cost in the meantime, or seeking a second opinion.
We do not have the in-house expertise to perform this work.
We do know that structural engineers are highly sought after
in the Canterbury region and we are making this plan on the
proviso that we will be able to contract the skills we need to
undertake this work.
We consider this work to be vital because of the threat to life
if buildings collapse. The cost for this work will be paid for this
through the general rate for three years from 2012/13 because
of the potential impact on the general public. The general rate is
funded through a portion being assessed as a fixed charge per
property and the balance assessed on the capital value of the
property.
Cost to Defend RMA/Court Action
Each year we need to get legal advice or representa tion, or
specialist advice about a variety of matters relating to resource
consents, district plan changes and policy de velopment.
Traditionally, we have tended to under-budget for these costs
as many of them are unknown when we prepare our annual
budgets. However, last year we were aware of a number of
situations that were going to incur legal or consultancy costs
and we did make a budget provision based on that knowledge.
Although we will continue to face unexpected legal costs into
the future, we have decided to continue to budget what we did
last year for each year of the long term plan, that is, $105,000
(adjusted for inflation) annually. This will be funded through a
District Rate. There will be situations where legal costs are far
in excess of our budget. The most recent example of this was
the cost to defend MainPower’s Mt Cass Wind Farm resource
consent. The cost to ratepayers was approximately $300,000
(allowing for the successful costs award against Mainpower
from the Environment Court of $136,394). Legal and specialist
advice comes at a price and we do not always have in-house
expertise for every scenario that comes to us.
Road Funding
Our roads are maintained and built using subsidy funds from
New Zealand Transport Agency (NZTA) and money collected
through rates. This excludes state highways which are funded
and maintained solely through NZTA. Three years ago,
central government deliberately cut maintenance funding to
all district councils, as it decided to focus on capital works to
national state highways (Roads of National Significance) and
the Auckland roading network needs as priorities. Central
government believes that “increased funding for State Highway
construction will bring benefits for national economic growth
and productivity, particularly given that State Highways carry
most inter-regional freight and link major ports, airports and
urban areas (Government Policy Statement 2012)
In 2009, all Road Controlling Agencies (RCA), of which we are
one, were told by the Minister of Transport to “do more with
less” in terms of road maintenance financial subsidy allocations.
We were tasked to find better and smarter ways of looking
after our roads without relying on the previous levels of NZTA
subsidy funding. To qualify for financial subsidy assistance, all
RCA’s are to use Activity Management Plans (AMP). When up
to date, our AMP provides us with a better understanding of our
current assets in terms of location, age and condition. This sets
our works programme for the following three years in terms
of maintenance, operations, renewals and capital works. This
programme is submitted to NZTA as part of the Regional Land
Transport Programme (RLTP). Our funding was cut by $600,000
per annum on average on our RLTP for the full funding cycle
covering the years from 2009 to 2012. Although the approved
subsidy funding was 4.5% more than the previous year’s budget,
it was substantially less than that required to maintain the
levels of service we wanted for our roading infrastructure. No
escalation (or inflation) was added for year 2 and 3 of this
programme which placed further pressure for us to “do more
with less”. In the meantime, we have restructured our road
maintenance contracts to get the most we can for our money
and to maintain levels of service for our local roads. Indicative
budgets have been released by NZTA for the three year period
from 2012 to 2015, which is 5% less than our RLTP submission.
This will result in approximately $226,000 less funding per
annum across all three years. We will continue to retain our
funding as previously indicated as unsubsidised work and the
rate impact for roading will continue as previously stated in the
plan. We have made the assumption that the reduced level of
NZTA funding will continue through the life of the LTP. This has
left us with a major challenge. Our Asset Management Plans
(AMPs) tell us when, how and why we need to do work on
each of our roads to ensure maximum whole-of-life for this
asset (maximum return on investment approach); but we do not
have the required subsidised income to maintain our roading
network to the level our AMPs stipulate.
We have done our best to drive greater efficiencies within
our current road maintenance contracts, without affecting the
current levels of service. The improved collaboration between
our contractors, suppliers and us using a ‘best-for-asset/bestfor
contract’ approach, has provided lower contract rates
that may allow us to maintain our current service levels until
2014/15 (assuming no untoward event happens that damages
our infrastructure). At the end of this period, our maintenance
contracts will be renewed with cost escalations included. This
is where we have a problem. NZTA have declared that they
will not pick up contract price escalations through their road
maintenance subsidy scheme. In the meantime, we have allowed
for inflation adjustments to the roading costs (using the inflation
assumptions) and also assumed that NZTA will continue to
meet their share of those costs that are currently subsidised,
15
www.hurunui.govt.nz
again based on the assumption that the financial assistance
rate will not change over the ten year period.
If NZTA do not include inflation in future subsidies, and maintain
the levels of cuts to date we will have to pass the difference in
costs to our ratepayers annually to maintain our current levels
of service and keep the road asset life in check. If we don’t,
this will leave us with a future financial shortfall that is further
susceptible to maintenance cost increases through peak oil and
bitumen cost increases in particular. We can either continue
to put up our annual rates to provide more local unsubsidised
funds to keep our roads in their current condition, or we can
accept that there will be a marked deterioration in our road
conditions (structurally, appearance and driving quality). The
impact of this is that our roading assets life will reduce and will
eventually devalue over time, thus not meet their initial designed
criteria outcomes.
The key problem that we face is that the level of cost that has
been allowed for in the Long Term Plan falls significantly short
of what was provided for in the AMP. The AMP was developed
prior to the change in central government policy and before we
were able to achieve greater efficiencies through our current
road maintenance contracts. The difference over the ten years
between what was scheduled in the AMP and what has been
provided in the plan amounts to a total of $18 million. Based on
the assumption that NZTA will provide the amount of subsides
allowed for in the plan, should we incur the level of cost in
the AMP, then that additional $18 million would need to be
covered by rates or other funding sources . We are confident
with achieving greater efficiencies in the current contracts so
that the roading network can be maintained at the current level
of service until 2014/15. Through submissions to the draft LTP,
some of you told us that you consider it essential that we do all
we can to prevent the roads deteriorating, even if that meant
paying more rates. To continue to meet the current level of
service, now and into the future, may require greater ratepayer
funding or a change to the current accepted levels of service.
This topic will be an ongoing discussion for us into future years
including the next long term plan review in 2015 and AMP
roading review 2014.
Amberley Swimming Pool
The life of the Amberley swimming pool and our awareness of
the community desire for an improved pool, whether that is
a major upgrade or a new facility, have been of interest to us
for some years now. Through the submisssions to the draft LTP,
we received 23 submissions on this subject with the majority
supporting this community desire. In 2008, we did a review
of the life-expectancy and replacement costs of the Amberley
swimming pool and concluded that the present pool was good
for at least 10 more years. In the 2009 long term plan draft,
we allowed $3 million in the 2018/19 financial year to build a
new heated, covered pool. The rating model to pay for the this,
allocated the greater costs to the Amberley Ward, and a lesser
amount to outlying areas on the basis of an assumption of usage
beyond Amberley. Consultation on this matter then, gained good
public support for the proposal, and it was decided to advance
the project to the 2013/14 year. The budget provision was made
on the basis that $1 million of the $3 million would be derived
from fund raising and that the Amberley community would take
the responsibility for this.
Three years have since passed and no fund raising activities have
taken place. Nor have we collected any rates to build up a fund
for a future pool. The Amberley Ward Committee established
a working group in 2011 to investigate the possibilities
for the Amberley swimming pool and to come up with a
recommendation to best suit the needs of the community. The
working group concluded that the site of the existing pool is
the best available and so commissioned a specialist engineer’s
report on options to upgrade the present complex. This was
undertaken in early 2012. The resulting suggestions include a
major upgrade of the existing pool costing just under $2 million
which is well within the original $3 million budget. However, the
estimated operational cost of running an all year heated pool,
amounts to between $260,000 and $340,000 per year. This is
after taking into account the entry fees, swimming lessons and
other revenue making pool activities.
Although the community desire is to have a heated indoor
pool that can operate either all year round, or at least most
of the year, the operational cost is significant and exceeds any
previous thinking about how much it would cost to actually
run the pool. Very few public swimming pools in New Zealand
make a profit or break even, and they are reliant on significant
subsidies from rates to operate. The Amberley ward ratepayers
have traditionally met the operational cost from amenity rates.
However, the estimates for running an improved, heated, all year
round pool is likely to exceed Amberley ratepayers ability or
desire to pay, and is substantially more than they pay now. There
is more work ahead for the working group, the Amberley Ward
Committee and the Council before a proper proposal with all
the facts is able to be put to the community.
For these reasons, we have decided to not make a budget
provision in this long term plan at this stage. We have requested
a report to come to a council meeting in the 2012/13 year to
explore options and costings for an upgraded pool. If supported,
our intention is to include a proposal for an upgraded pool
and funding model into the 2015/25 Long Term Plan. In the
meantime, we have an expectation that those wanting an
improved pool become involved and commence fund raising.
The Amberley Ward Committee and the rest of the district will
need to have the opportunity to say what they are prepared
to fund before we can decide who should pay. We intend to
properly consult with you over this matter. For us to have the
confidence to make a significant budget provision, we need to
be able to give you the full story on the cost, who will pay and
what you will get for your money. In the meantime, we have
budgeted for the continued operation of the current swimming
pool on the assumption that it may still be operational up to
2020, depending on what is decided before then.
16
Hurunui Community Long Term Plan 2012 - 2022
Cheviot Library/Service Centre
We received a large number of submissions regarding moving the
Cheviot community library out of the Cheviot Area School and
into the Cheviot Service Centre on the main street of Cheviot.
Several of you were not in favour of this option, but many of
you did endorse this concept. We endorsed the Cheviot Ward
Committee’s recommendation that the library is moved. This
will enable the library and council services to be delivered from
the one site by one person. The school library will remain in its
current location.
The service centre has not had an upgrade for years and
therefore needs some alterations and refurbishment to create
a more vibrant community space. A working group comprising
of a mix of local Cheviot people has been selected to work on
the detail of the move and to create a new look for the service
centre / library to capture the unique essence of Cheviot and
provide a service to meet the needs of the locals. Detail such
as the opening hours, days of the week to be open, design of
the interior and exterior of the building, etc are to be worked
through. The timetable for the project will also need to be
worked through, but it is planned take place in the 2012/13 year.
$100,000 has been set aside for the building alterations which
will not incur an increase in rates.
Cheviot Medical Centre
We own four medical buildings in the District – in Hanmer
Springs, Rotherham, Waikari and Cheviot. We originally got
involved in this area years ago to help attract qualified medics
into the district to take up private practices without the
deterrent of capital cost, and provide health services that are
of a good quality, affordable and meet the needs of our rural
communities. This is an on-going challenge as attracting doctors
and nurses who are prepared to work and live in rural New
Zealand is an issue that Hurunui does not face alone. Times
have changed and the ideal of finding General Practitioners
wanting to set up practice in a rural community and stay for
life (and work alone) has become unsustainable. However
important considerations for future planning still include having
high quality medical facilities and a strong network of medical
practitioners and providers to support each other.
Whereas we do not recruit medical staff for the district, we
believe we do have a role to provide medical facilities and
assist in facilitating good outcomes. We regularly meet with
key providers of medical services for the District, including the
Canterbury Rural Primary Health Organisation, Canterbury
District Health Board and local practitioners, etc. These
discussions help us keep up with the issues our GPs and medical
centres are facing and helps us work together to find solutions.
One of the areas we are able to assist is building medical centres
that cater for current and future demand.
Three of our current medical centres are modern, while Cheviot
requires an upgrade or replacement in the near future. This
upgrade has been signalled by its inadequacy to deliver modern
health care into the future. We have allocated $1 million (to
be inflation adjusted) in year 2016/17 to build a new one. The
project will be funded by an internal loan and servicing of the
loan over 20 years is proposed that this be funded through the
Cheviot Medical Centre Rate which is charged to each property
in the Cheviot Ward. This will result in the Cheviot Medical
Centre Rate moving from approximately $30 per ratepayer
to $120 per ratepayer from 2016/17. Some submissions were
received on this topic and all supported improving the Cheviot
Medical Centre. There is still work to be done before a rebuild
or upgrade is undertaken to make sure this is good use of your
money. We will want to be confident that a new building is
needed as opposed to upgrading the current facility, and we also
need to be sure that this is what the community needs. Further
consultation will be done closer to the time before any work
is done.
Rotherham Public Toilet
We have purchased a section on the main road through
Rotherham adjacent to the new Amuri Medical Centre, for a
village green. The section is ideally suited to a public toilet for
motorists passing through Rotherham en-route to the Inland
Road. For motorists travelling to Kaikoura from the West
Coast, this would be the first public toilet since Springs Junction
(i.e. without detouring into remote sites such as Boyle River
or to Hanmer Springs). A toilet on this section will also be
useful for local residents using the village green for picnics or
recreation (playground) or on their way to or from the Health
Centre. This is a long term proposal as we intend building the
toilet in the 2017/18 year. Because it is a long way off and we are
not certain of the demand in this location, we will seek public
views on this proposal again when we review this long term
plan in 2015. In the meantime, $90,000 has been included in the
budget to be funded through the District Rate.
Hanmer Springs Facilities
1. Sports Ground
The Hanmer Springs Community Board intends to upgrade the
Hanmer Springs sports ground as it is out of date and will not
meet the needs for future growth and demand. Before doing
any work however, the Board will commission an engineer’s
report on the project to determine the extent of works that
can be carried out. They plan to commission this in 2012/13
to prepare for the physical works to be done in 2015/16. The
report will more accurately scope the project including whether
the project is staged over more than one year. The estimated
cost involved is $30,000 for the engineers report, and $1 million
for the actual development work.
The engineers report will cover the feasibility of including the
following facilities in the upgrade:
• A full basketball size court that can cater for
other indoor sports such as badminton, volleyball,
bowls, netball etc
• A ground floor kitchen facility able to cater for
17
www.hurunui.govt.nz
conferences, weddings, sports club functions, etc
for up to 500 people
• A bar that also provides for the above
• A storage area that will hold equipment, chairs,
tables, and other items used for group functions
• Toilet facilities to serve people using the sports
stadium inside and out
• Area/s suitable for meetings, lounge and
relaxation area, and an administration office
• Changing facilities for sports teams including
shower blocks
• Two Squash courts
• A gymnasium area
There was a support through the submissions for an upgraded
sports ground. Because the Board is not prepared to spend
more than $1 million, this may mean they need to prioritise
what is included in the upgrade. Affordability will be a key
consideration.
2. Community Hall Extension
The Hanmer Springs Community Board will proceed with the
previously planned extension to the Hanmer Springs community
hall and has allocated $194,400 to do this in 2014/15. They will
spend $10,000 in 2012/13 to finish the work on the existing
stage floor and frontage that users of the hall have been asking
for.
The extension to the community hall is planned to include:
• Upgrading the existing toilets on either side of
the stage
• Replacing the existing changing rooms with
a large, open, multipurpose space that can be
partitioned off to create several changing rooms
as required. The open area can also be used for
art displays, meetings, etc, as well as changing
rooms for performances.
• A storage area for lighting, sound, stage props, etc
• Entry access for wheelchairs and large items (for
stage productions, etc)
As with the Hanmer Springs sports ground upgrade, the Board
will do its best to maximise the budget so that the extension to
the hall caters for future demand as well as the current demand,
but do not expect to go beyond the allocated budget. Once
again, support for this project was received, particularly from
Hanmer Springs residents.
Funding the Hanmer Springs Community Board
The Hanmer Springs Community Board members are elected
every three years in line with the local authority triennial
election process. There are 6 Board members, with five being
elected on the Board, and the 6 th member being the appointed
local Councillor.
The selected members are paid an amount determined by Council
in consultation with the Community Board. The Councillor is
not remunerated for being on the Community Board as he is
paid as a Councillor through the Council remuneration pool.
The selected members are paid 50% from amenity rates (from
Hanmer Springs Ward ratepayers) and 50% funded as part of
the cost of Governance through the Governance Rate, which
is a District Wide Rate. The members, current remuneration is
shown in table 1.
The Community Board works for the Hanmer Springs Ward
residents and ratepayers. Consequently, we think it appropriate
that all of their remuneration is paid through local amenity
rates from Hanmer Springs ratepayers, rather than a portion
coming from the District Wide Rate. We have four Ward or
Community Committees set up in other Wards that operate in
a similar way to a Community Board, with similar delegations,
but members are not paid. Therefore, we have decided that the
Hanmer Springs community will fund the total remuneration
for the Community Board. Based on the current level of
remuneration paid to the Community Board Members, the total
cost to the Hanmer Springs Amenities Rates will be $23,178 per
annum commencing from 2012/13.
Security of Access to Hanmer Forest Tracks
The Hanmer Forest is a significant tourism asset to the district.
It is estimated that 70% of visitors to the Hanmer Springs
Thermal Pools and Spa (approximately 511,000 people) visit the
forest each year. Public access to the forest has been provided
for since the early 1900s resulting in the development of an
extensive recreational track network. Legal public access to the
forest was lost when ownership of the land was transferred to
Ngai Tahu. The continuance of the current informal public access
depends on the goodwill of the Iwi and the forest leaseholder.
The Hanmer Forest covers 9212 hectares in area and is
comprised of native forest, exotic production and research
forests, and public parks and reserves. The forest adjoins the
Hanmer Springs urban boundary and extends north to the
Hanmer Range ridgeline, Mt Isobel, Jollies Pass and Jacks Pass;
east to Boundary Stream; south to the Hanmer River; and west
to the Rogerson River catchment and Mt Tabletop.
Ngai Tahu Forest Estates Ltd are the largest landowner at nearly
55%, the Department of Conservation (DOC) manages 45%,
and HDC less than 1%. Although the minor landowner, the HDC
land provides critical linkages from the Hanmer Springs village
via Conical Hill and the 22ha Dog Stream/Brooke Dawson/
Tarndale reserves adjacent to the forest.
There has been some community concern that access to the
Ngai Tahu land can be closed at any time by the landowner.
However, Ngai Tahu have expressed their commitment to
Hanmer Springs and agree how important the tracks are. They
have indicated that they want to be part of future development
18
Hurunui Community Long Term Plan 2012 - 2022
of the township and future planning for the Hurunui district, and
are prepared to work with us over the forest’s long term use. A
number of submissions were received on this matter supporting
our intention to work toward securing long term use to the
forest. A representative group of Councillors has been identified
to progress further discussion with the owners of the forest to
find a way forward. No funding has been allocated.
Table 1: Community Board Members Remuneration
Position
Remuneration
Chair of the Community Board
$7,902 pa
Other Members (each)
$3,819 pa
Table 2: Funding the Key Issues
Issue Cost Method of Funding Commencement
Drinking Water Standards
$14,000,000 Capex
$484,000 Opex
District Wide 2015/16
Miox & new water treatment $758,000 Targeted to Dwellings affected 2012/13
Hanmer Springs Sewer Improvements $220,000
$1,288,560
Hanmer Springs Sewer Rate 2012/13
2015/16
Targeted Tourism Rate $286,000 Targeted Tourism Rate on-going
Insurance $550,000 Spread across organisation 2012/13
Earthquake Strengthening $71,162 District Wide Rates 2012 - 2015
RMA/Court Action $105,000 District Wide Rates 2012/13
Cheviot Library/Service Centre $100,000 District Wide funding 2012/13
Cheviot Medical Centre $1,150,700 Cheviot Medical Centre Rates 2016/17
Hanmer Springs Sport Stadium $1,077,379 Amenity Rates and
Development Contributions
2015/16
Hanmer Springs Community Hall Extension $194,400 Hanmer Springs Amenity Rate 2014/15
Rotherham Public Toilet $90,000 District Wide funding for
Public Toilets
2017/18
Hanmer Springs Community Board
$23,178 Hanmer Springs Amenity Rate 2012/13
Amberley Swimming Pool
$0 No budget allocated yet
19
www.hurunui.govt.nz
Financial Strategy
Executive Summary
Core Principles
In reviewing the Long Term Plan (LTP), we revised our core
principles and these have been used as the basis in developing
our Financial Strategy. These principles are:
• Focus on core services
• Financial responsibility and affordability
• Continuous improvement in service to everyone in our
district
• Facilitate appropriate growth in the district
• Maximise Thermal Pools and Spa profit
Key Factors in our Financial Strategy
Within the context of our core principals, the following have
been identified as the key factors that shape the Financial
Strategy over the life of the Long Term Plan:
• We want to ensure that our services remain affordable
• We want to maintain or improve our current levels of
service
• Our key funding mechanisms are:
a Rates, both District Wide and Targeted rates
b Surpluses derived from the Hanmer Springs
Thermal Pools and Spa
c The use of the Internal Financing structure which
provides internal loans for communities requiring
funding and also an avenue for communities to build
up funds to meet funding requirements in the future
In taking care to ensure that our services remain affordable,
we have had modest rate increases over the past three years.
However, due to various factors facing us, particularly the
increased cost of insurance and compliance with drinking water
standards, rates will increase at levels well above what was
anticipated when the 2009-2019 LTP was prepared. (Refer to
the Key Issues section).
We are carefully monitoring our levels of service for roads
due to reduced government subsidies (refer to Key Issues
section). With the exception of roading, we intend to maintain
our levels of service in most areas. With regards to improving
drinking water levels, treatment of sewage and developing some
community facilities, we will be in a position to improve the
levels of service that we are currently providing. We also aim
for continuous improvement to our customer service.
We continually review funding options available. The use of
the internal financing structure allows communities to carry
out required capital expenditure and manage the cost of those
works over a longer period. As a result, this smoothes out the
rating impact and allows communities to start setting aside
funds to meet the capital projects for the future.
The Hanmer Springs Thermal Pools and Spa is a successful
Council owned business and we proactively use the profits to
offset costs relating to the reserves in the District which results
in lessening the rating burden. For the first three years of the
Long Term Plan the Council is funding more reserve based costs
than it is earning from the surpluses from the Hanmer Springs
Thermal Pools & Spa and by doing so, is utilising some of the
reserve balance that has been generated by the surpluses in
the past.
Our Financial Position at the Start of the LTP
Period
Our financial position at the start of the Long Term Plan period
is set out in the 2011/2012 Annual Plan which shows:
• The total rates were set at $12.8 million; of which $5.3
million are in District Wide rates and $7.5 million are
in targeted rates.
• Total income from non-rate sources was $16.9 million,
which includes $9.6 million in gross revenue derived
from the Hanmer Springs Thermal Pools and Spa.
• Total Operating Expenditure is forecast at $23.5 million
and Capital expenditure for the 2011/2012 year is
expected to be $9.2 million (which includes a level of
Capital that has been carried over from the 2010/2011
year).
• External Debt was expected to be $13.5 million at
the end of June 2012; however, the forecast has been
reduced to $12.5 million due to deferring some projects
as part of the LTP budget preparation.
• Internal Financed Debt is expected to total $16.6
million as at 30 June 2012.
• Total Assets as at 30 June 2011 was $335 million, of
which $253 million related to our infrastructure.
Our Financial Position at the End of the LTP Period
As at the end of June 2022, the key components of our financial
position are forecast as follows:
• Total rates revenue will increase by 55% over the ten
years to reach $19.9 million in the 2021/2022 year.
• Total income from non-rate sources will be $22.3
million (including $13.8 million in gross revenue derived
from the Hanmer Springs Thermal Pools and Spa).
• Total Operating Expenditure will be set at $39.6 million.
• Capital expenditure over the ten years will amount to
$77.3 million with the amount expected to be required
in the 2021/2022 year at $7.7 million.
• External Debt will peak at $22.5 million in the 2015/2016
and 2016/2017 years, but will reduce to $12 million by
June 2022.
20
Hurunui Community Long Term Plan 2012 - 2022
• Total Assets as at 30 June 2022 is expected to reach
$494 million.
Rates, Increases and Limits
The overall rates increases for the next three years are as
follows:
• In 2012/2013, the increase is 5.83% (this is one of the
largest increases required for some years and is primarily
due to factors outlined earlier such as insurance and
drinking water, and funding some significant capital
expenditure projects over the last few years).
• In 2013/2014, the increase is 5.77%
• In 2014/2015, the increase is 5.37%
The Local Government Act now requires Councils to set limits
on rate increases. Because a simple inflation target as the basis
for setting a rate increase limit does not reflect the forecast
costs that will be imposed on us, we have opted to set the
rates increase limits at 2% above the forecast increases. As a
result, the limit for the 2013/2014 year will be 7.77% and for the
2014/2015 year, the limit will be 7.37%
Because of our rating structure, the overall increase in rates
will not be consistent for each property throughout the district.
It will depend on the targeted rates that are charged to that
particular property and also the capital value of the property.
External Debt and Limits
1. The Local Government Act also requires us to set a limit on
our external debt levels. These debt levels are set out in our
External Liability Management policy on page 217 and the
limits are based on ratios centred on the level of income.
These ratios are considered standard for the sector and the
maximum debt is set at 100% of our Total Income and 10%
of our Total Equity. This means that for the 2012/2013 year,
where total income is forecast at $30.3 million and Total
Equity forecast at $341.7 million, that the maximum level of
debt is $30.3 million. For 2012/2013, the anticipated level
of debt is $18.5 million. We plan to be well within prudent
limits for the period of the plan.
Implications of the Council’s Financial Strategy
The Local Government Act requires us to assess whether we
have the ability to provide and maintain existing levels of services
and meet additional demands for services within the rates and
debt limits as set out within the financial strategy.
We face potential issues in the future regarding the level of
funding for roading expected from the New Zealand Transport
Agency (NZTA). We estimate that there is a $15 million
difference over the ten year period of the LTP between what
our Asset Management Plans tell us is needed to maintain our
roading network and what we have built into this draft LTP
taking into account the NZTA funding. (See the Roads and
Footpaths Activity section on page 84).
We are not contemplating taking on debt greater than $22.5
million and the maximum amount of interest expected to be
charged on the external debt is budgeted at less than $1.3
million. Therefore, with the exception of the Roading Network
due to circumstances outlined earlier, we believe we have the
ability to maintain existing target levels of service and to meet
additional demands for service within those debt limits.
Core Principles
Our revised core principles have provided the base in developing
our Financial Strategy for this LTP. These are further explained
in this section.
1. Focus on Core Services
The focus on core services is consistent with the intent of the
Local Government Act. As a rural district, our focus has always
been on key infrastructure – roading, water and sewerage. Since
2008 after sever flood events, we have undertaken significant
work to improve our stormwater and drainage assets. While
community services and facilities (eg: halls, libraries, public
toilets, reserves etc), may not be seen as essential services, they
do form an important part of the community infrastructure.
We have undertaken significant community projects in the last
three years including the town centre upgrades in both Hanmer
Springs and Amberley, as well as constructing a new Medical
Centre in Rotherham.
2. Financial Responsibility and Affordability
Affordability of rates was a key aspect in the preparation of the
2009-2019 LTP and in that respect; we managed to maintain
modest increases in the rates over the subsequent three year
period. In preparing the 2012/22 LTP, affordability is still an
important factor as well as spending responsibly to minimise
rate increases. Costs do increase and we are ever mindful of the
need to ensure that these costs are appropriately funded, while
ensuring our debt levels remain manageable.
3. Continuous Improvement in Service to Everyone
in Our District
In the context of affordability, we aim to improve our customer
service to everyone who needs our services. This includes
our residents and ratepayers, as well as visitors to our district.
Our annual resident satisfaction survey provides us with good
information to gauge how we are doing and where to improve.
Whereas actual levels of service in most cases are intended on
being maintained, our aim for continuous improvement relates
21
www.hurunui.govt.nz
to getting the best out of our contracts for service, having
helpful friendly staff, being responsive to complaints and service
requests by getting back to customers quickly, etc. Regarding
actual levels of service, these are discussed under the ‘Key
Factors for Our Financial Strategy’ part of this section.
4. Facilitate Appropriate Growth in the District
We want our district to continue to grow and that not only will
more people want to live in the Hurunui, but that those who are
here already, will want to stay. Growth in our population helps
spread rates across a wider number of ratepayers and helps to
retain key services, such as medical services, schools and shops,
etc.
We are mindful that growth needs to be sympathetic toward
the environment and the district’s rural values which is why
we talk about “appropriate growth”. Accordingly, we need to
ensure that our planning rules (as we review our District Plan)
do meet the objectives of the District as a whole.
5. Maximise Thermal Pools Profit
We are in the envious position of owning one of New Zealand’s
key tourist facilities - the Hanmer Springs Thermal Pools and
Spa (HSTP&S). The success of the HSTP&S has had a flow on
effect to other businesses that service the tourist industry. The
HSTP&S is sited on a reserve vested to the Hurunui District
Council in accordance with the Reserves Act. Because of this,
we are able to use the profits from the HSTP&S to fund other
reserves that we administer. This includes the Hurunui Memorial
Library (also known as the “District Library”), the public toilets
and cemeteries throughout the district, as well as a wide range
of recreational reserves. This is a particular point of difference
from other Local Authorities in New Zealand who will generally
have to fund these types of functions through rates.
Key Factors for our Financial Strategy
Within the context of our core principals, we have identified the
following key factors that shape our Financial Strategy over the
life of this LTP:
• We want to ensure that our services remain affordable
• We want to maintain or improve our current levels of
service
Our key funding mechanisms are:
a. Rates, both District Wide and Targeted rates
b. Surpluses derived from the Hanmer Springs Thermal
Pools and Spa
c. The use of the Internal Financing structure which
provides internal loans for communities requiring funding
and also an avenue for communities to build up funds to
meet funding requirements in the future
We Want to Ensure that Our Services Remain
Affordable
The concept of affordability is one of our core principles. Our
modest overall rate increases in the past three years have been:
• 2009/2010 - 4.20%
• 2010/2011 - 3.04%
• 2011/2012 - 3.60%
We considered all of these increases to be affordable and
deemed that, the community agreed going by their submissions
when we consulted the public on these. However, there are
various factors facing us that will require us to increase rates
at levels well above what we anticipated when we prepared the
last LTP (the 2009-2019).
As outlined in the Mayor and CEO’s introduction we are
experiencing the on-going financial impact of the Canterbury
Earthquakes. In particular, there has been a significant increase
in the cost of insurance for everyone. While the increase is large
and affects the overall rates increases, we consider it necessary
and responsible to insure our keys assets.
Meeting drinking water compliance is a costly issue (see the Key
Issues section). We consider the cost of complying with the
standards to be unaffordable to communities on the individual
water supplies affected. Because of that, we have developed
a two stage approach where we will aim for Ecoli compliance
immediately and start to build a fund to meet some of the cost of
the full compliance in later years. The rationale of this approach
is to ensure we are in a position to meet our obligations in an
affordable manner.
Whereas we are intending on maintaining our current levels of
service for roading over the next three year period, our ability
to do so in future years may be challenging. The ongoing impact
of receiving less NZTA funding than we had earlier anticipated in
our Asset Management Plans will eventually have a detrimental
effect on our levels of service unless more rates are collected.
The issue we will likely be facing in our next Long Term Plan, will
be affordability versus levels of service.
We Want to Maintain or Improve Our Current
Levels of Service
With the exception of roading as outlined above, we are
committed to maintaining our levels of service. In some areas,
we intend to increase the levels of service, through:
• Complying with the increased Drinking Water Standards
• Improving the treatment of sewage in Hanmer Springs
• Employing an engineer dedicated to stormwater
management throughout the District
• Building new or upgraded facilities, such as:
• upgrading the Hanmer Springs Domain
22
Hurunui Community Long Term Plan 2012 - 2022
• upgrading or building a new Medical Centre in
Cheviot
• Improving our customer service (within existing
budgets)
Each of these will be funded through rates or other mechanisms
such as the use of the internal loans or development
contributions, to ensure that the rates increases imposed are
kept to an affordable level.
The Use of Our Key Funding Arms
We have three key arms to our funding structure to meet the
operating and capital expenditure planned for the period of the
LTP.
1. Rates
Under the Local Government (Rating) Act 2002, we have
the ability to set rates to fund the activities we undertake.
The way we set our rates is set out in the Funding Impact
Statement and Rates System section.
This Financial Strategy also sets out requirements for us to
place limits on rate increases and this is discussed further
below.
2. Surpluses Derived From the Hanmer Springs Thermal Pools
& Spa
As outlined in the Core Principles above, we operate the
HSTP&S complex on a reserve that has been vested to the
Council under the Reserve Act.
Over the past decade, the operation of the HSTP&S complex
has been extremely successful and we constantly consider
how to maximise the profits generated. December 2010 saw
the completion of a $7.5 million expansion of the complex,
which provided a wider range of facilities and has proved to
be an outstanding success. We are aware that as a tourist
destination, the HSTP&S need to be in top condition and
refreshed if we are to maintain our place in the tourism
market. Because of this, and the ability for the profits from
the complex to fund it, further capital projects are planned for
the ten year period of this LTP.
The use of the HSTP&S surpluses is a key funding option
available to meet the costs of our reserves throughout the
district. The plan estimates that a total of $24 million will be
used from the surpluses derived from the HSTP&S to offset
these costs. For the first three years of the Long Term Plan, the
council is forecasting to spend more on reserve based costs
than it is earning from the surplus of the Hannmer Springs
Thermal Pools & Spa, however, the Council is comfortable
with utilising some of the existing reserve balance to fund this.
3. Internal Financing Structure
We developed an internal financing structure to provide a
consistent approach to funding capital expenditure across
the organisation. Because we do not build up depreciation
reserves, this system is important to enable communities
to access funding to undertake capital expenditure projects
rather than being required to fund such project through other
sources, such as rates. Our Internal Financing Policy is fully
discussed on page 262.
The structure is based on individual activities essentially
holding its own bank account. Income (rates, development
contributions, etc.) are deposited into the account and
expenditure, both operating and capital, is withdrawn from
the account. Like other bank accounts, the account can be in
funds or overdrawn. When the balance is in funds, we pay an
amount of interest and if the balance is overdrawn, then that
activity pay interest to us.
The result is that communities are able to undertake capital
expenditure projects by allowing the capital balance to go into
overdraft. This allows those communities to spread the cost
of required capital work over a period of time, rather than
having to fund it entirely in the year that it is incurred, by
setting rates to cover an amount of debt repayment every
year.
The internal financing structure also allows communities to
start building up funds by budgeting to continue to set rates at
a higher level than required to meet all operating costs, even
if there is no debt. This will mean that the excess operating
income will be held for that community to meet capital
expenditure requirements in the future. The benefit to those
communities in this position is that we pay interest to those
communities, which further increases their account balances.
The key benefit from the use of the internal financing structure
and building up fund is that it avoids large increases in rates
as it allowed the Council and the individual communities to
smooth the rating effect of large capital projects.
The anticipated level of internally financed debt at as 1 July
2012 is $16.6 million. The balances over the ten year period
are further disclosed in the Reserve Funds section of the LTP .
23
www.hurunui.govt.nz
Financial Position
Financial Position as at 2012
Our financial position at the start of the LTP period is set out in
the 2011/2012 Annual Plan shown below:
• The total rates were set at $12.8 million; of which $5.3
million are in District Wide rates and $7.5 million are in
targeted rates.
• Total income from non-rate sources was $16.9 million,
which includes $9.6 million in gross revenue derived from
the Hanmer Springs Thermal Pools and Spa.
• Total Operating Expenditure is forecast at $23.5 million
and Capital expenditure for the 2011/2012 year is
expected to be $9.2 million (which includes a level of
Capital that has been carried over from the 2010/2011
year).
• External Debt was expected to be $13.5 million at the
end of June 2012; however, the forecast has been reduced
to $12.5 million due to deferring some projects as part of
the LTP budget preparation.
• Internal Debt is expected to total $16.6 million as at 30
June 2012.
• Total Assets as at 30 June 2011 was $335 million, of which
$253 million related to our infrastructure.
The Relevance of the Current Financial Situation
to the Financial Strategy
• The current financial situation is relevant to the
financial strategy as it provides the starting point for the
development of the budgets for the LTP.
• There have been relatively low levels of rate increases for
the past three years.
• We took on debt for the first time in September 2010,
principally to provide funding for the $7.5 million
expansion of the Hanmer Springs Thermal Pools and Spa,
but there was already a need to obtain external debt to
fund the following keys projects over the preceding years:
• Town Centre Development in Hanmer Springs ($1.9
million) and Amberley ($560,000)
• Water Upgrades in Amberley ($714,000), Cheviot
($658,000) and Hanmer Springs ($788,000).
• Sewer Upgrades for Amberley ($2 million) and
Hanmer Springs ($1.8 million)
• Capital Expenditure to address the Drainage issues in
the Amberley Ward ($890,000).
• New Medical Centre in Hanmer Springs ($450,000)
and Rotherham ($1 million)
• As a result, there have been a number of large projects that
have been funded through the internal financing policy and
the requirement for those communities to start to repay
the debt through rates to replenish our cash reserves.
Until then, we will continue to hold debt for the period
of the LTP.
• The financial performance of the Hanmer Springs Thermal
Pools and Spa remains critical to our ability to keep rates
at an affordable level. The surpluses derived from the
HSTP&S is actively used to fund various costs relating to
reserves throughout the district. If we did not have the
surpluses to offset these costs, then they would need to be
rated for. In addition, and under the terms of the Internal
Financing Policy, we receive interest from the HSTP&S
for funds lent to it for the recent expansion works. This
interest received is used to offset the costs of our external
debt and to offset the District Wide Rates. The Council is
forecasting to spend more on reserve based costs than it
is forecast to earn from the surpluses derived from the
Hanmer Springs Thermal Pools & Spa for the first three
years of the Long Term Plan. To fund this the Council will
utilise existing reserves.
Forecast Financial Position as at 2022
At the end of the LTP period, our position is forecast as follows:
• Total rates revenue of $19.9 million; of which $8.0 million
are in District Wide rates and $11.9 million are in targeted
rates.
• Total income from non-rate sources is expected to
be $22.3 million, which includes $13.8 million in gross
revenue derived from the HSTP&S.
• Total Operating Expenditure is forecast at $39.6 million
and Capital Expenditure for the 2021/2022 year is
expected to be $7.7 million.
• External Debt was expected to reduce to $12 million at
the end of June 2022.
• Internal Debt will reduce to $15 million by the end of
June 2022.
• Total Assets as at 30 June 2022 is forecast to be $493
million, of which an estimated $393 million relates to
infrastructure.
Key Movements Over the Ten Year Period
Rates – Over the ten year period, we are forecasting to
receive a total of $167 million in Rates. This is broken down to
$69million in District Wide Rates and $98 million in Targeted
Rates. To achieve the total increase of 55% since the 2011/2012,
we intend to take incremental steps over the ten year period,
however with a relatively large increase of 5.83% required for
the 2012/2013 year.
Non-Rate Income – Excluding gains in asset valuation and vested
assets, we are forecasting that a total of $191 million will be
received from other forms of income. Roading Subsidies make
up $38 million over the period, Development Contributions are
forecast at $4.3 million and the gross revenues from the HSTP&S
are forecast at $115 million. In addition, we are expected to
receive $3.4 million from Forestry Sales, which is used directly
to reduce debt.
Operating Deficits - Due to Council spending more on reserve
based costs than it is forecast to earn from the surpluses from
the Hanmer Springs Thermal Pools & Spa, for the first three
24
Hurunui Community Long Term Plan 2012 - 2022
years of the Long Term Plan, the Council will record small
operating deficits. These will be funded by existing reserves
built up by surpluses generated by the Hanmer Springs Thermal
Pools & Spa in the past.
Operating Expenditure – Total Operating Expenditure is
expected to be $351 million over the ten years. The total
increase from the 2011/2012 year is expected to be 38% over
the ten years and average of less than 4% per annum.
Capital Expenditure – Over the ten year period, we are
forecasting to spend a total of $77 million on Capital
Expenditure. $6.3 million is scheduled to fund projects required
due to growth, further $14.7 million relates to projects that will
assist in improving the levels of services we provide and the
remaining $56.2 million will be used to replace existing assets
when they reach the end of their useful lives.
This information is particularly relevant in determining
growth projections for the period and was also used for the
Development Contributions methodology. We have opted for
the medium growth projections for the ten year period. On this
basis, we have assumed that there will be approximately 17%
growth over the ten year period. The increase predicted for
Hanmer Springs is approximately 21%. With Hanmer Springs
being a tourist town, the growth in new sections and buildings is
not always consistent with an increase in population due to the
higher percentage of non-resident ratepayers who may own a
holiday home rather than a permanent residence.
The following graph shows the movements in the population
of each township in the District over the period from 1991 to
2006:
External Debt – This is scheduled to increase from the $13.5
as schedule in the 2011/2012 Annual Plan to reach a maximum
of $22.5 million in the between July 2015 and June 2017. With
communities required to repay certain levels of debt each year
and some communities starting to build up funds to carry out
capital expenditure in the future, we are forecasting that the
external debt will reduce to $12 million by the end of June 2022.
Internal Debt – With communities repaying debt and building
up funds, the movements in the internal debt levels move from
$16.6 million in 2012 down to $15 million in 2022.
Assets – It is expected that the value of our assets will be $493
million as at 30 June 2022. This increase of $165 million has been
brought about by the level of Capital expenditure to be incurred
over the ten years, but also due to the fact that the assets are
required to be revalued on a regular basis. It is forecast that the
increase in the asset values will account for $147 million of the
increase over the ten years.
Population Changes
The LTP has been prepared on the basis that the population
will continue to grow. Due to the effect of the Canterbury
Earthquakes, the 2011 Census was cancelled. Therefore, we
have used the population projections from the 2006 Census
to forecast population changes for the period of the LTP.
The following graph shows the population projection for the
Hurunui District over the next 20 year period.
It is acknowledged that the population of the Hurunui is older
than the national average. This presents issues around ensuring
there are appropriate facilities and services for older people.
We committed to providing buildings for medical centres to
ensure that health services are adequately provided to the
community. The following graph (using the 2006 Census data)
shows the age distribution for the Hurunui in comparison with
Canterbury and New Zealand:
25
www.hurunui.govt.nz
Capital and Operating Costs of Providing for
Changes in Population
In response to the demands of increasing population, we have
identified key projects proposed to respond to the anticipated
growth. These are further discussed in the Development
Contributions Policy but include the following:
1. Water supplies upgrades undertaken on Amberley,
Ashley Rural, Cheviot, Hanmer Springs and Hurunui
Rural water supplies which built in capacity to ensure
both existing ratepayers and future ratepayers are
serviced.
2. Sewerage systems have had capacity built into upgrade
work on ponds in both Amberley and Hanmer Springs
to allow for future growth. In addition, provision has
been made to allow for new areas to be reticulated in
Amberley.
3. Upgrades to both the Amberley Domain Pavilion and
the Hanmer Springs Hall have been undertaken to
provide additional facilities for both existing and future
ratepayers.
4. Provision has been made to develop new and upgrade
existing reserves to cater for increased population.
5. Stormwater provision to be factored in the development
of new areas in Amberley and Hanmer Springs.
Changes in Land Use
The Hurunui District has historically been an agriculture based
district, primarily beef and sheep. Over the past ten years, there
have been marked changes to the use of land throughout the
District.
The growth in tourism, especially Hanmer Springs and centred
around the development of the HSTP&S, has resulted in
increased number of accommodation providers and other
businesses associated with tourism, as well as more holiday
homes.
For a period, there was significant growth in viticulture, in
particular in the Waipara area, which provides ideal conditions
from growing premium quality grapes. The Amuri Basin has
seen a significant increase in the number of dairy farms and that
trend is likely to increase if access to further irrigation water
can be secured.
The Glenmark area has had two major wind farm applications –
one from Mainpower and the other from Meridian Energy.
The following pie chart shows the current land use of properties
in the Hurunui District as at September 2010 (the date of the
last District revaluation):
Capital and Operating Costs of Providing for
Changes in Land Use
Because of the uncertainty of the changes in land use, no specific
allowance has been made for changes to capital or operational
costs to allow for this.
Key Levels of Service
Capital Expenditure Programme
Capital expenditure requirements for our infrastructural assets
and roads are dictated by the levels outlined in the Asset
Management Plans (AMPs) for each activity. The AMPs are
updated on a regular basis to ensure that various changes to the
plan in the interim period are accounted for.
As discussed in the Key Issues section, we face potential issues
in the future regarding the level of funding that is expected to
be provided for roading from the NZTA. Our AMP for Roading
sets out what level of expenditure we have forecast to meet the
current levels of service. Since the AMP was adopted, there was
a change to the level of expenditure that the NZTA is prepared
to fund and this means that the expenditure allowed for in the
LTP budgets are significantly short of what was provided for in
the AMP. The AMP was developed prior to the change in central
government policy and before we were able to achieve greater
efficiencies through our current road maintenance contracts.
The difference over the ten years between what was scheduled
in the AMP and what has been provided in the LTP amounts to
a total of $18 million. Through achieving greater efficiencies in
the current roading contracts, we are planning on delivering the
same levels of service for the next three year period. In future
years, our ability to meet the same levels of service may not be
achieved without increasing rates.
26
Hurunui Community Long Term Plan 2012 - 2022
In general, Capital Expenditure is broken down to three key
categories:
1. Capital expenditure relating to meeting the existing
levels of service. This will be principally replacement of
the existing assets
2. Capital expenditure aimed at improving the current
levels of service
3. Capital expenditure on assets required due to growth.
Some items of Capital Expenditure may actually fall into more
than one category. For example, the replacement of a length of
water pipe is required to provide water to existing consumers,
but the diameter of that length of pipe may be increased from
its existing diameter to allow for greater capacity in the future.
An assessment is carried out as to apportion the cost of each
project to the category to which it relates and if that cannot
be readily assessed, the category will be determine by the key
reason for the work to be undertaken.
Over the period of the LTP, we have budgeted $77 million to
spend on Capital expenditure. Of this balance, $56.2 million
related to maintaining the existing levels of service by providing
for replacement of current assets. A further $14.7 million
is aimed at making improvements to the level of service and
the balance of $6.3 million relates to projects scheduled due
to growth. The following graph shows the percentages of the
Capital Programme that relate to each category.
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
Growth Related
Improved Levels of Service
Renewals
The key area of capital expenditure is relating to the infrastructural
assets. Of the total Capital Expenditure programme for the
ten years of $77 million; $43.5 million relates to Roads and
Footpaths; $10.1 million relates to Water Supplies and $3.8
million relates to Sewerage Schemes. The following graph shows
the split of the Capital Expenditure programme to each of the
ten Groups of Activities for the ten year period.
12,000,000
10,000,000
8,000,000
6,000,000
4,000,000
2,000,000
-
Corporate Services
Governance
Hanmer Springs Thermal Pools and Spa
Growth and Development
Environment and Safety
Community Services and Facilities
Roads and Footpaths
Stormwater and Drainage
Sewerage
Water Supplies
Rates
We base rates on the Capital Value of each property. We set our
rates by way of District Wide Rates and Targeted Rates.
• District Wide rates are charged on all properties in
the district, regardless of location. They are are broken
down further to: Governance; Roading; Planning; Waste
Management; Canterbury Museum; and other General
Rates.
• Targeted rates are charged for specific activities based
on services provided or land use. They are broken down
further to: Water; Sewer; Stromwater/Drainage/Land
Protection; Ward Amenities; Refuse Collection Ward
Medical Centre; Rural fire; Tourism and Other Sundry
Targeted rates.
• The rates and how they are set are further defined in the
Funding Impact Statement but the key changes proposed
for the LTP relate to the funding of Drinking Water
Standards, District Wide Stormwater work and the
Capital Levy anticipated to be charged by the Canterbury
Museum.
Drinking Water Standards
The funding of the drinking water improvements will be done
in two stages. Firstly, those supplies that are to be treated, the
direct operating costs of the treatment and the servicing of the
debt arising out of the capital expenditure needed to treat the
relevant water supplies, will be collectively charged by rating
each dwelling that benefits from the work. Secondly, from
2015/2016, a provision is to be made from the general rate to
build a fund to offset some of the significant capital cost to be
incurred in achieving full compliance with the drinking water
standards.
District Wide Stormwater
After the flooding events in 2008, much more emphasis has been
placed on development of stormwater plans for the District as
a whole. A stormwater engineer is to be appointed in 2013 to
look after this area. As the issue is district wide, the funding is
to come from the District Wide General Rate, with a portion
to be funded by way of a fixed charge and a portion by way of
capital value.
Canterbury Museum
As one of four contributing authorities to the Canterbury
Museum, the Hurunui District has been contributing a levy to
fund the operations of the Museum on an annual basis. Hurunui
has set a fixed charge on every property in the District to
cover this rate. The Museum is proposing to carry out a $63
million building project, which will need to be funded by way
of a Capital Levy. The budget set aside for the Capital levy is
$50,000 in 2013/2014, $100,000 in 2014/2015 and $50,000 in
2015/2016. It is intended that the Capital levy will be charged
on the same basis as the operating levy by sharing it as a fixed
charge per property.
27
www.hurunui.govt.nz
Rate Increases
In general terms, we try to keep the overall rate increase each
year to the level of inflation. However, the actual increases
in rates from an organisational point of view do change from
year to year depending on the funding options chosen and also
the fact that there are operational costs that are not carried
out every year, but need to be funded in the year they are
incurred. As a result, as the rates increase is an amalgam of many
individual rate increases, we intend to set the rates at the level
that is required, rather than to ensure the overall rate increase
is matches inflation.
The Hurunui District has a small population (one of the smallest
in New Zealand), and because of this, various factors can have
a marked effect on the rates increases in any one year as there
are fewer people to spread the cost across. As a result, there is
an allowance for any rate increases being higher than the level
of inflation due to extraordinary items. These items include, but
not limited to, the following:
• Capital expenditure requirements, which increases the
level of debt for individual communities.
• Increase expenditure due to compliance with new
legislation.
• Increased expenditure resulting from extraordinary
events, such as the Canterbury Earthquakes.
When determining the overall rate increases, an allowance is
made for a 1% increase in the capital value of the district each
year. This may be reviewed if there are significant areas of growth
experienced in excess to this. The increase is only applied to
the district wide rates as it is difficult to accurately assess the
growth in individual areas that targeted rates are charged to.
Because of the structure of our rating system, the overall increase
in rates will not be consistent for each property throughout the
district. It will depend on the targeted rates that are charged
to that particular property and also the capital value of the
property. We provide the relative rate increase comparisons for
22 various sample properties from throughout the district. We
have used the same 22 properties for years as this gives us a
good indication of the impact of increases across the different
communities and house values. The sample properties analysis
is provided the Appendices section.
Overall Rate Increases
Based on the budgets provided for the LTP, the overall rates
increases for each year of the LTP are as follows:
Year
The rates increases are broken down to the following:
Limits on Rate Increases
Overall Rates Increase
2012/2013 (Year 1) 5.83%
2013/2014 (Year 2) 5.77%
2014/2015 (Year 3) 5.37%
2015/2016 (Year 4) 3.17%
2016/2017 (Year 5) 3.82%
2017/2018 (Year 6) 3.15%
2018/2019 (Year 7) 2.61%
2019/2020 (Year 8) 4.01%
2020/2021 (Year 9) 3.74%
2021/2022 (Year 10) 3.33%
Year
District Wide
Rates
Targeted Rate
2012/2013 (Year 1) 5.63% 5.96%
2013/2014 (Year 2) 7.15% 4.80%
2014/2015 (Year 3) 6.34% 4.67%
2015/2016 (Year 4) 2.14% 3.95%
2016/2017 (Year 5) 3.20% 4.28%
2017/2018 (Year 6) 2.14% 3.89%
2018/2019 (Year 7) 0.30% 4.31%
2019/2020 (Year 8) 3.37% 4.47%
2020/2021 (Year 9) 2.60% 4.55%
2021/2022 (Year 10) 1.17% 4.85%
All Councils are required to set a limit on rates increases over
the ten year period of the LTP. There are no set rules around
how we are to determine what limit it imposes.
Options
There were a number of options available to us, for instance:
• Setting rate increases to an inflation rate.
28
Hurunui Community Long Term Plan 2012 - 2022
• Setting a percentage increase.
• Setting an increase based on known factors and
assumptions.
We felt that setting rate increase limits based on an arbitrary
rate of inflation was not consistent to the assessment of the
proposed costs outlined in the LTP. This is because it did not
take into account items such as new capital expenditure, which
could result in a necessary increase in rates to fund the work,
which could exceed the overall increase in rates.
Setting a percentage increase per annum again did not reflect
the assessment of the proposed costs in the long term.
Furthermore, as the rates for individual communities can
increases at varying amounts due to various factors, it was
difficult to set a percentage increase that reflected these factors
adequately.
As a result, we decided that the limit to be placed on rate
increases is to be set as a percentage of the overall rates
increases predicted in the LTP.
Limits
The percentage on top of the predicted rates increases will be
2%. In determining this percentage, we that felt 2% provides
sufficient flexibility, particularly if there is significant cost
increases (on top of what has been allowed for using the BERL
cost price increase projections) imposed on us as a result of the
on-going effects of the Canterbury Earthquakes.
As a result, the limits will be as follows
Year
Overall
Increase
Overall
Increase Limit
2012/2013 (Year 1) 5.83% 7.83%
2013/2014 (Year 2) 5.77% 7.77%
2014/2015 (Year 3) 5.37% 7.37%
2015/2016 (Year 4) 3.17% 5.17%
2016/2017 (Year 5) 3.82% 5.82%
2017/2018 (Year 6) 3.13% 5.15%
2018/2019 (Year 7) 2.61% 4.61%
2019/2020 (Year 8) 4.01% 6.01%
2020/2021 (Year 9) 3.74% 5.74%
2021/2022 (Year 10) 3.33% 5.33%
Again, because of the nature of the targeted rate structure,
the increase (or decrease) in rates for any year for individual
properties can vary markedly.
Non-Rates Income
We rely heavily on other forms of income to finance our
operations. For the period of the LTP, the budget has scheduled
that 54% of our total income is generated from sources other
than rates.
25,000,000
20,000,000
15,000,000
10,000,000
5,000,000
-
For 2012/2013, the income from non-rate sources is expected
to total $16.6 million and this is scheduled to increase to $23
million by 2021/2022.
New Zealand Transport Authority Subsidies
The first key component of non-rate income is NZTA subsidies,
which are used to fund both operating and capital expenditure
relating to the roading network. We have assumed that the
current funding assistance rate of funding provided by NZTA
will be maintained for the period of the LTP. Further discussion
of this is provided in the Forecasting Assumptions on page 148
and in the Key Issues section.
Hanmer Springs Thermal Pools and Spa Revenue
The other key component is the Revenue derived from the
HSTP&S, which accounts for approximately one third of the total
income received. The HSTP&S is run as a separate business unit
of the Council and after allowing for Operating Expenses and
Interest, the surpluses are actively used to fund reserve costs
throughout the District. The reserve costs include: the cost
of the library, cemeteries, public toilets and a range of district
reserve costs. Over the last five years, the surpluses from the
pools have contributed a total of $7.65 million to these reserve
costs, which would otherwise need to be rated for. Over the life
the long term plan it is forecast that a total of $24 million will
be used from the surpluses derived from the HSTP&S to offset
these reserve costs.
Development Contributions
Other Income
Hanmer Springs Thermal Pools and Spa
NZTA Subsidies
External Interest Received
Development Contributions
Development Contributions also form a key component for
funding capital expenditure which has been required due to
increased growth. It is anticipated that over the life of the LTP, we
will receive a total of $4.3 million in Development Contributions,
however the amount actually received will be dependent on the
level of growth experienced. The Development Contribution
Policy is on page 201.
29
www.hurunui.govt.nz
Fees and Charges
Fees and Charges account for the remaining non-rate income.
We review our fees and charges each year and try to ensure
that they help offset actual costs and that the activities are not
overly reliant on rate funding instead. We also aim to make the
fees and charges affordable and fair on those who use them.
Targets for Investments
Cash Investments
As a result of a large Capital programme over the 2009/2010 and
2010/2011 years, principally due to the expansion works at the
HSTP&S, we had to take on term debt for the first time. Over
the period of the LTP, we expect to remain as a net borrower. As
a result, we no longer hold any long term cash assets in the form
of bonds or stock. Any spare cash funds are generally held on
call or in a short term investment of less than three months to
earn a small amount of interest as the interest rates are better
than holding the funds in a current account.
Equity Investments
Currently, we hold two equity investments – one in Civic
Assurance and the other in Transwaste Canterbury. Neither
assets are readily tradable on the open market, but we have
objectives for retaining ownerships of these investments.
Our holding in Civic Assurance was to maintain Civic as an
option in the insurance market. Civic was set up to provide
Local Authorities with an option for insurance that generally
met the unique insurance requirements faced by Councils.
Civic Assurance was heavily affected by the claims made as a
result of the Canterbury Earthquakes and there was a need
to recapitalise to ensure that it remains part of the insurance
market for local authorities in the future. It is not expected to
return a dividend for over the period of the LTP.
We own 1.2% of Transwaste Canterbury, which owns and
operates the Kate Valley Landfill. The value of our investment
as at 30 June 2011 was $269,000.The Company is 50% owned
by five of the Councils in Canterbury and our objective for
holding our investment is to continue to receive dividends
from the Company. The net return to us is approximately 27%
on Hurunui’s share of the net asset backing of the Company
and we have budgeted to receive $72,000 per annum from this
investment.
Forestry Investments
We hold approximately 240 hectares of trees. Some of the key
plantations are due for milling during the life of the LTP. Forestry
assets are held as long term investments on the basis of net
positive discounted cash flows, factoring in projected market
prices and annual maintenance and cutting costs. All income
from forestry is included in the statement of comprehensive
income, and this is used to fund replanting of the land. Where
there is an excess of funds, we may distribute this in a manner
we see fit.
External Debt
We have two key areas of borrowing - Internal and External.
The Internal debt is pursuant to our Internal Financing Policy, as
discussed above.
As our cash resources have been drawn down to fund key
capital projects in the past few years, we needed to take on
external debt to manage cash flow. We are now expecting to be
a net borrower for the period of the LTP.
Anticipated Levels of External Debt
As at 31 December 2011, the total amount of external debt we
held was $12 million. At the end of the ten year period, the debt
is expected to be $12.0 million, with the debt level is expected
to peak at $22.5 million over the period between July 2014 and
June 2017. The anticipated debt levels over the period.
Year
Total
Anticipated
Debt
Limits on Debt Levels
Total Anticipated
Interest Expense
2012/2013 (Year 1) $18.5 million $969,000
2013/2014 (Year 2) $20.0 million $1,203,000
2014/2015 (Year 3) $21.5 million $1,297,000
2015/2016 (Year 4) $22.0 million $1,359,000
2016/2017 (Year 5) $22.5 million $1,359,000
2017/2018 (Year 6) $21.5 million $1,281,000
2018/2019 (Year 7) $19.5 million $1,156,000
2019/2020 (Year 8) $17.5 million $1,000,000
2020/2021 (Year 9) $14.5 million $828,000
2021/2022 (Year 10) $12.0 million $750,000
Our External Liability Risk Management Policy sets out the
limits on the level of debt that we can take on. The ratios have
been developed in accordance to the industry standard and
have been set against the levels that are appropriate for us to
take debt from the Local Government Funding Agency (LGFA).
The net debt limits provided for in the policy are that total debt
shall be no more than 100% of total income and no more than
10% of total equity. Based on the levels of income allowed for
30
Hurunui Community Long Term Plan 2012 - 2022
in the LTP, the limit of the debt that could be taken on is $42.5
million.
Year
100% of Total
Income
10% of Total
Equity
2012/2013 (Year 1) $30.3 million $34.2 million
2013/2014 (Year 2) $31.6 million $34.6 million
2014/2015 (Year 3) $32.9 million $35.2 million
2015/2016 (Year 4) $34.3 million $37.7 million
2016/2017 (Year 5) $35.4 million $38.2 million
2017/2018 (Year 6) $36.5 million $38.9 million
2018/2019 (Year 7) $37.9 million $42.0 million
2019/2020 (Year 8) $39.2 million $42.7 million
2020/2021 (Year 9) $40.7 million $43.8 million
2021/2022 (Year 10) $42.5 million $47.5 million
The policy also provides for the total amount of interest
expenses shall be no more than 5% of total revenue and no
more than 10% of annual rates income. Based on the maximum
of $42.5 million in income, the total interest cost can be no
more than $2.13 million.
Year
5% of total
income
10% of total
annual rates
income
2012/2013 (Year 1) $1.52 million $1.36 million
2013/2014 (Year 2) $1.58 million $1.45 million
2014/2015 (Year 3) $1.65 million $1.53 million
2015/2016 (Year 4) $1.72 million $1.59 million
2016/2017 (Year 5) $1.78 million $1.65 million
2017/2018 (Year 6) $1.83 million $1.70 million
2018/2019 (Year 7) $1.90 million $1.75 million
Holding a Debenture Trust Deed provides us with security for a
range of different funding options:
• Registered Bank Debt
• Use of the Local Government Funding Agency
• Issuing Council Debt directly to the market
Further information is available in the External Liability
Management Policy.
Implications of Hurunui’s Financial Strategy
Assessment of our ability to provide and maintain existing levels
of service and to meet additional demands for service within
those rate increase limits:
We face potential issues in the future in regards to the level
of funding that is expected to be provided for roading from
NZTA as discussed previously in this Financial Strategy. It
has been estimated that the difference over the ten years
between what was scheduled in the AMP and what has
been provided in the LTP amounts to a total of $18 million.
Assessment of our ability to provide and maintain existing levels
of service and to meet additional demands for service within
those debt limits:
As listed in the table above, we are not contemplating
taking on debt greater than $22.5 million and the
maximum amount of interest expected to be charged on
the external debt is budgeted at less than $1.4 million.
Therefore, with the exception of the Roading Network
due to circumstances outlined earlier, our assessment is
that we do have the ability to maintain the existing levels
of service and to meet additional demands for service
within those debt limits.
2019/2020 (Year 8) $1.97 million $1.82 million
2020/2021 (Year 9) $2.04 million $1.90 million
2021/2022 (Year 10) $2.13 million $1.98 million
Security for Borrowing
Prior to taking on debt for the first time in September 2010, we
prepared a Debenture Trust Deed and selected Perpetual Trust
as our Trustee. The Debenture Trust Deed is a standard security
document for Councils. The key security available is that a charge
can be made against the rates of the Council to repay debt so
the market perspective on this is that a Debenture Trust Deed
provides a low level of risk for an investor or funding provider,
which in turn should allow for lower interest rates.
31
www.hurunui.govt.nz
Statement Concerning Balancing of the Budget
Introduction
In terms of the Local Government Act 2002, the Council is
balancing the budget over the period of the Long Term Plan as in
most years; the budgeted operating income exceeds budgeted
operating expenditure. There are some areas of expenditure
that the Council has resolved not to fund, which are discussed
further. The Council also has developed an internal financing
policy to cope with funding for future capital expenditure
requirements.
Local Government Act 2002
Under Section 100 of the Local Government Act 2002, the
Council is required to balance the budget. The provisions of the
sections specifically state that “A local authority must ensure
that each year’s projected operating revenues are set at a level
sufficient to meet that year’s projected operating expenses”.
The Act goes further to state that a local authority may set
projected operating revenues at a different level from that
required if the Council resolves that it is financially prudent to
do so, having regard to:
to that activity. In some cases, the Council has resolved to use
reserves to fund some specific expenditure. This is particularly
the case where the Council actively uses the Reserve built up
by surpluses recorded from the Hanmer Springs Thermal Pools
and Spa to fund the operating expenditure of other reserves
throughout the entire district.
Receipt of Capital Income
For some of the Council activities, the Council has budgeted to
receive various amounts of income that are of a capital nature.
This capital income is in the form of development and reserve
contributions and vested assets which are not used to reduce
the amount of rates to be charged of a particular activity. These
amounts are instead applied to the capital requirements of the
activity that it relates to.
Funding of Depreciation
The introduction of the Local Government Amendment (No 3)
Act 1996 imposed the requirement for local authorities to fund
depreciation.
a) The estimated expenses of achieving and maintaining
the predicted levels of service provision set out in the
long-term council community plan, including the estimated
expenses associated with maintaining the service capacity
and integrity of assets throughout their useful life; and
b) The projected revenue available to fund the estimated
expenses associated with maintaining the service capacity
and integrity of assets throughout their useful life; and
c) The equitable allocation of responsibility for funding
the provision and maintenance of assets and facilities
throughout their useful life; and
d) The funding and financial polices set out in this long
term plan
Use of Reserves
The council is forecasting to record an overall deficit (excluding
gains on Asset Revaluation) in each of the first three years of teh
Long Term Plan. These deficits have been caused by the Council’s
decision to fund more reserve based costs than it is generatimg
from the surpluses of the Hanmer Springs Thermal Pools & Spa.
The Council is comfortable with this approach as it is able to
utilise surplusses that have been generated over the past few
years that have yet to be allocated. The Council is forecasting
to record surpluses for each year of the Long Term Plan from
year four onwards. In some activities however, the Council has
resolved not to set revenue to fund all of the costs relating
In 1999, the Council widely consulted with its community over
this requirement and it concluded that the Council will not cash
fund depreciation on Water and Sewer assets, roading or ward
Amenity assets. In addition, it has been resolved not to fund
depreciation on the library building.
Rates for these activities are set at a level higher than required
to meet the operating costs in terms of the Internal Financing
System. The additional rates will be used to either repay debt (if
the activity holds some internal debt) or used to build an amount
to fund future capital expenditure. The Internal Financing system
is fully discussed in the Internal Financing Policy.
Implications to Not Fully Fund
Depreciation
As there are no specific depreciation reserves created for water,
sewer, roading and ward amenities, there are no funds available
immediately to apply to capital expenditure requirements of
each of these activities. As a result, the community of benefit
is required to meet the cost of the capital expenditure through
the use of internal loans or fund the capital cost through rates
and other income.
If internal loans are used, there is the requirement on that
community of benefit to fund not only the appropriate interest
charge but also a portion of the principal of the outstanding loan
on an annual basis. Both interest and principal repayments has
32
Hurunui Community Long Term Plan 2012 - 2022
the effect of increasing the operational cost that the community
must bear and as a result, increases in the rate requirement are
inevitable. The Internal Financing system goes further to ensure
that communities continue to fund additional payments, even if
the debt has been repaid, to build up a reserve fund to assist in
funding capital expenditure requirements in the future.
Council is comfortable with increasing rates to meet the cost of
interest and principal because existing ratepayers have previously
been relieved of any rate increases that may have been required
if the Council resolved to fully fund the depreciation on those
assets.
33
www.hurunui.govt.nz
Community Outcomes
Introduction
‘Community outcomes’ are the community’s overall aspirations
for the future of the Hurunui district. They relate to all aspects
of our rural life – our environment, economy, social, and cultural
wellbeing. These four wellbeings are commonly referred to
by government agencies as summarising the various aspects
needed for healthy community life in New Zealand.
The community outcomes in this long term plan relate directly
to the activities that we do as a council as they are the only
ones we have direct control over. There can be many more
community outcomes which can only be achieved with help
from other organisations such as business, government, the
police and many others.
Hawarden /Waikari Volunteer Rural Fire Force (VRFF)
The term ‘community outcomes’ is used to describe what
people want to happen now and in the future for the benefit
of not only today’s people, but future generations. Community
outcomes are about improving the wellness of our communities
over time in a sustainable manner.
Identifying the Community Outcomes
In past years, we have sought public views to identify what our
communities consider important for the future of the Hurunui
District. In addition to this, we have often sought community
views on a variety of issues and we feel confident we have a
good understanding of what people in the Hurunui consider to
be important. We have since scaled down previously identified
community outcomes to five broad outcomes that we as a
Council are able to work toward achieving. These community
outcomes are described in table 1. and each is aligned to one of
the four key wellbeings as well as the service or activity that we
provide to contribute toward achievement of them.
Hawarden/Waikari & Scargill VRFF
Scargill VRFF
34
Table 1:
Hurunui Community Long Term Plan 2012 - 2022
Community Outcomes and the Link to What Council Does (Activities)
Social
Wellbeing Outcome Definition Council Activities (How we contribute)
Cultural
Economy
Environmental
A desirable and
safe place to live
A place where
our traditional
rural values and
heritage make
Hurunui unique
A place with a
thriving local
economy
A place with
essential
infrastructure
A place that
demonstrates
environmental
responsibility
• We have attractive well designed
townships
• Communities have access to
adequate health and emergency
services and systems and
resources are available to meet
civil defence emergencies
• Risks to public health are
identified and appropriately
managed
• People have a range of
opportunities to participate in
leisure and culture activities
• Our historic and cultural
heritage is protected for future
generations
• We are seen as a good place to
do business, to live and to visit
• We have a strong emphasis
on service delivery across
all infrastructure including
roading, water (for drinking
and development), waste water,
stormwater and solid waste
• We protect our environment
while preserving people’s
property rights
• We minimise solid waste to the
fullest extent, and manage the rest
in a sustainable way
Measuring and Reporting our Progress
Each of the above outcomes is aligned to our services which
will contribute toward the achievement of them. We are
responsible for monitoring our performance each year, and the
results are provided in our Annual Report. How we are doing
with each of our services will give a good indication of how we
are going overall to achieve the community outcomes. See the
Council Activity pages for performance information.
Groups
• Community Services and
Facilities
• Environment and Safety
• Governance
• Community Services and
Facilities
• Hanmer Springs Thermal
Pools & Spa
• District Promotion
• Hanmer Springs Thermal
Pools & Spa
• Water Supply
• Sewerage
• Stormwater & Drainage
• Roads & Footpaths
• Environment & Safety
Individual services
Property - Pensioner Housing,
Residential Housing, Public Toilets,
Council Offices & Depots, Car Parks,
Medical Centres, Halls, Swimming
Pools, Township Maintenance
Emergency Services - Civil Defence,
Rural Fire
Compliance and Regulatory
Functions - Building, Public Health,
Liquor Licensing, Animal Control
Governance
Community Services - Library, Youth,
Community Development, Grants
and Service Awards
Reserves - Parks and Reserves,
Queen Mary Historic Hospital
Reserve, Cemeteries
Thermal Pools – Spa, i-site, pools,
café
Promotion
Tourism
Economic Development
Water Schemes
Sewerage Schemes
Stormwater & Drainage
Roading - Roads, Bridges, Footpaths,
Street Lighting, Road Safety
Resource Management & Planning
- RMA Consents, Administration
& Policy Development, Subdivision
Inspection
Waste Minimisation - Refuse,
Recycling, Transfer Stations, Litter Bin
Collection
35
www.hurunui.govt.nz
Aligning Our Long Term Plan With the Government’s Drivers
for Economic Growth
The Government’s Economic Growth
Agenda
The government’s principal economic goal is to deliver greater
prosperity, security and opportunities to all New Zealanders.
It wants to improve New Zealand’s fundamental growth
momentum. An important part of this is through the economy
rebalancing itself toward exporting and investment. The
government has a six-point Economic Growth Agenda aimed at
creating an environment that allows businesses to grow, export
and create high-value jobs. The six drivers for economic growth
are:
• Enable better science, innovation and trade.
• Remove red tape and unnecessary regulation.
• Deliver better, smarter, public services.
• nvest in productive infrastructure.
• Lift education and skills.
• Create a growth-enhancing tax system.
Hurunui’s Annual Economic Growth
Business and Economic Research Limited (BERL) Regional
Performance Indicators Report for 2011, published in March 2012,
which measures each district’s economic performance, ranked
Hurunui 10th out of 66 territorial local authorities in New
Zealand. Nine key performance indicators were compared
for the year ending March 2011. We maintained our 10th place
2010 ranking.
Infometrics Limited Annual Economic Profile for 2010, published in
2011, said Gross Domestic Product (GDP) in Hurunui measured
$303m in 2010, down 0.3% from a year earlier. New Zealand’s
GDP declined by 0.5% over the same period. Hurunui’s GDP
growth of -0.3% ranked it number 32 among the 72 territorial
authorities for GDP growth.
Agriculture, fishing and forestry was the largest industry in
Hurunui in 2010 accounting for 45.3% of total GDP, followed by
business and property services (12.4%).
Council’s Contribution Towards Economic
Growth
From a local perspective, Hurunui District Council plays a
significant role in growing the local economy. Its involvement in
areas such as leadership, planning and infrastructure, regulation,
services, business support, and social and community, actively
create environments that attract, retain, and grow economic
activity. Our contribution occurs within its total annual spending
(planned to be $30m in the 2012/13 year). This spending can
be viewed as an investment into the Hurunui environment that
36
enables individuals, households and organisations to produce
and contribute to economic growth.
Leadership: We contribute through our role in local strategic
planning. We have developed a new vision (‘Community partnership
in growth and wellbeing’) and have developed a Long
Term Plan that provides for economic growth and allows business
interests to flourish. Key drivers for the Plan include core
principles of:
• Focusing on core services.
• Financial responsibility and affordability.
• Continuous improvement in service to everyone in our
district.
• Facilitating appropriate growth in the district.
and
• Maximising our Hanmer Springs Thermal Pools and Spa
profits.
• Hurunui District Council being a High Performance
Organisation.
Infrastructure: We contribute through our role as an infrastructure
provider. Our investment in infrastructure plays a direct
role in creating an attractive environment for business to
invest.
Regulation: We contribute through our regulatory role. We
can make it easier for new investment, for businesses to grow
and create jobs.
Services: We contribute through our role in providing local
amenities, such as libraries and reserves. We provide services
that make our communities attractive to skilled migrants.
Business Support: We contribute through our support to
business and industry development. Our economic development
arm, Enterprise North Canterbury (ENC) carries out a range of
activities that help retain businesses and support growth and
prosperity in North Canterbury. ENC’s budget is over $1.1m
p.a. It receives 44% of its funding from the Hurunui and Waimakariri
District Councils (HDC funding is $50,000 p.a.); 30%
from central government contracts; 18% from the private sector
and other grants; and 8% from sponsorship.
We also continue by promoting tourism in order to attract
visitors into the district to enable local business growth (refer
to the District Promotion activity for proposed tourism changes
outlined for consultation).
Community: We contribute through our contribution to social
and community affairs, strengthening local social capital.
Overall, we have a fundamental role in ‘shaping’ places in the
Hurunui, like our towns, ensuring infrastructure and amenities
are provided to make our district attractive to investment and
skilled immigrants.
Hurunui Community Long Term Plan 2012 - 2022
Some of the important things we plan to do in this Long Term
Plan that directly relate to the government’s six-point Economic
Growth Agenda are highlighted below:
Enable Better Science, Innovation and
Trade
Science and innovation are enormously important drivers of
New Zealand’s economic growth.
ENC will be proactive in searching for and supporting new
initiatives that create substantial wealth in North Canterbury.
Particular emphasis will be given to the primary sector and its
related servicing industries. ENC’s Rural Technology Transfer
Project is particularly relevant. This project is about turning new
ideas developed at Lincoln Research campuses into practical
applications resulting in commercial returns on the farm.
Improved techniques for both dryland farming and irrigated land
use options are being pursued.
ENC will continue to facilitate the establishment of local
industry groupings where these are sought by the sector, to
achieve efficiencies in marketing, product development and
securing of resources. Management and marketing of the North
Canterbury Food and Wine Trail is one such example.
ENC assesses economic development opportunities in local
towns. A Cheviot project is currently underway.
In 2011 we approved a Hurunui Tourism Strategy and currently
continue to fund tourism promotion in order to attract visitors
into the district to support local business growth. Likewise, ongoing
investment in and the marketing of our Hanmer Springs
Thermal Pools and Spa complex is provided for in this Plan;
the Thermal Pools and Spa complex are an internationally
recognised tourism icon that return a growing income stream
to fund works and services on Council reserves and off-set the
size of the district wide rate requirement.
Overseas trade links can be a productivity springboard. For this
purpose, councils often form overseas sister city relationships.
To date, we have not taken on such a role. Forming a relationship
with Hung Hu City in China at a cost of $7,500 p.a. has been
requested of Council. More information is being sought. No
provision for such a relationship is included in this Plan at this
stage.
Remove Red Tape and Unnecessary
Regulation
We have implemented the government’s recent simplified
Resource Management Act changes to reduce costs and make
processes clearer; and it will implement any further RMA and
building regulation reforms when enacted, to make it easier for
businesses to grow, invest and create jobs.
In terms of our own regulations, over the past few years we
have carried out a significant number of District Plan changes to
ensure the District Plan is up to date and that our rules reflect
current thinking. Among these approved changes, relatively
large amounts of land have been opened up for development
in Amberley, Hanmer Springs and Gore Bay, new areas of land
have been zoned for business and industrial purposes, and
appropriate rules for vine yards wanting to install frost fans have
been agreed.
We are required to give effect to recent new National Policy
Statements (NPS) such as the NPS for Renewable Electricity
Generation 2011. The government has a renewable electricity
target of 90% of electricity from renewable sources by 2025. This
requires a significant increase in the proportion of electricity to
be generated from renewable resources. The government was
concerned renewable electricity generation was being unduly
impeded by variable provisions in local authority policies and
plans and changing attitudes to the environmental effects of
development associated with renewable electricity generation
activities. Accordingly there are now new guidelines to ensure
the national significance of renewable electricity generation and
associated activities are more explicitly recognised in policy
development and resource management consenting processes.
This Long Term Plan contains funding for a comprehensive
review of our District Plan. We expect the District Plan to be
ready for notification by the end of 2013.
The Environment Court released its decision at the end of
2011 on the Mainpower proposal to establish and operate a
$200m wind farm at Mt Cass Waipara. The initial application was
declined by Hurunui District Council appointed commissioners.
During extensive mediation the proposal was modified and this
modified proposal was directly referred to the Court and it
is this proposal that has been granted consent, subject to an
extensive suite of conditions. Mainpower have eight years to
give effect to the consent. The Council will have an important
regulatory role to fulfil in respect to consent requirements.
In 2011 we agreed to directly refer Meridian Energy’s proposed
$200m to $300m Greta Valley wind farm development consent
application to the Environment Court. Meridian Energy has
agreed to pay our direct referral costs. We expect the Court
will be hearing the application by mid-2012.
In September 2011, developers announced their plans for a
$120m shopping centre and residential development on the
eastern side of Amberley. The $30m shopping centre on State
Highway One was granted a non-notified resource consent
by us in February 2010, but developers are still finalising plans
and have yet to provide a firm start date for what is likely to be
a staged development.
The $90m residential development is expected to open up 500
to 600 lots in total. We granted a subdivision application for the
first stage of the development late last year.
37
www.hurunui.govt.nz
In October 2011, another 60 lot subdivision application was
granted on the Western side of Amberley.
ENC will continue to play a role assisting new businesses
establish in the district. Part of this role is acting as an interface
for businesses with us to ensure regulatory processes are work
effectively.
In preparation of this Long Term Plan we commissioned
PricewaterhouseCoopers to review our Development
Contributions policy. As a result, a number of minor amendments
were agreed to ensure we will collect the correct amount of
money from developers to cover the costs of growth (refer to
the Development Contributions section of this Plan).
Deliver Better, Smarter, Public Services
We have a High Performance Organisation culture. A range of
work aimed at improving customer services and achieving cost
savings and value for money is undertaken each year.
We competitively tender a significant amount of its work.
Last year we saved $200,000 with our three year public toilet
cleaning contracts. Grass moving and street cleaning tendering
also resulted in savings. In our largest contract area, road
maintenance, last year Downers won this work, tendering a
three year price of $11,595,216. This was $3,707,704 under
our engineer’s estimate based on historic rates, and $2,113,444
lower than the next lowest tendered price. Savings are reinvested
into the roading network.
We are involved in and will continue to look for opportunities
in Shared Services arrangements in order to deliver our
services and to help get value for money (refer Shared Services
references throughout this Plan). See Table1: Shared Services.
ENC will continue to carry out regular research with local
businesses to identify gaps, opportunities and track business
issues and trends.
Invest in Productive Infrastructure
First-class infrastructure is an important enabler of higher
productivity and economic growth. In this Long Term Plan
we are investing in owning and maintaining a high standard
of infrastructure that meets both our community’s economic,
social, cultural and environmental needs, and the government’s
legislative requirements.
Importantly, this Plan makes the significant funding provision
necessary for Hurunui to be able to meet government’s Drinking
Water Standards. The Plan provides for more public toilets;
more cemetery land; new stormwater infrastructure; more
parks and reserves infrastructure; for library, hall and service
centre improvements; and for new emergency management and
rural fire equipment, to name just a few. It also contains initial
proposals for new sporting and medical centres.
Table 1: Shared Services
Hurunui District Council Shared Services
Arrangements as at February 2012
Collaboration Joint Procurement Shared Services
Canterbury Water Electoral Services Transwaste Kate Valley
Management Strategy
landfill
Civil Defence
Rural Fire
Flood Protection
Office accommodation
(for CRC)
Transportation
priorities
SOLGM – best practice
work
Ingenium – asset
management work
Building Accreditation
Environmental Health
District Plan work
Rate collection (for
CRC)
IT/ GIS/ Library
IT (hardware and
software)
SOLGM – industry
good work
SOLGM – staff
recruitment and
retention
Regional Purchasing
Group (electricity, fuel)
ENC
CED Co Ltd
Canterbury Museum
Insurance – Riskpool/
LAPP/ Civic
Building control work
Regional planning Road Maintenance
responses
(some sharing with
Waimakariri DC)
HDC Natural
Biodiversity (govt grant)
Environment Fund (joint
grant with Mainpower)
Community
Development (govt
grant)
Libraries (located with
local schools)
Water (Ashley
scheme extending into
Waimakariri DC area)
Water will be a key part of North Canterbury’s transformational
economic development. We continue to support the Canterbury
Water Management Strategy in this Long Term Plan. We provide
for our share of the operation of the Hurunui Waiau Zone
Committee, which is a joint committee with the Canterbury
Regional Council. The Regional Council’s Regional Water
Committee will be considering the matter of how to fund the
provision of infrastructure associated with any large water
storage options that are seen as feasible. Properly managed, bulk
water storage could result in large productivity gains in North
Canterbury. No Council funding for such a purpose has been
discussed or provided for in this Plan to date.
With the removal of the Hurunui and Waiau River moratoriums
on 1 October 2011, Meridian Energy and Ngai Tahu Property
have jointly lodged initial consent applications for a proposed
hydro and irrigation scheme to be located between the Waiau
and Hurunui Rivers. The development of the project will be
dependent on the Hurunui Waiau Regional Plan progress
in 2012 and the RMA consent process. The parties still have
significant investigations and design work to complete and
believe construction is likely to be at least 10 years away. We are
38
Hurunui Community Long Term Plan 2012 - 2022
likely to have an important consenting role.
The Hurunui Water Project has also lodged consent for Waitohi
storage in line with the Zone Implementation Programme’s
preferred option.
The Long Term Plan contains further capital funding provision
for on-going renewal and refreshment of our Hanmer Springs
Thermal Pools and Spa complex.
ENC is also focusing on government’s rural broadband delivery
project (directed at schools and hospitals) to put together local
business consortia to investigate higher capacity broadband
services for rural businesses to create new wealth, as an
adjunct to the government’s programme. We will be involved in
consenting requirements for at least two new cell phone towers
that are planned as part of the roll-out.
Lift Education and Skills
ENC will continue to provide training and coaching programmes
aimed at improving local business skills and business capability.
ENC is carrying out work to support the Amuri Dairy Employers
Group and Dairy NZ to improve employment practices, and the
recruitment and retention of employees in the Amuri area.
We continue to run our Secondary Education School Achievers
Awards, giving out $10,000 annually to assist young people to
undertake further study.
We continue to run our Youth Development Programme, aimed
at helping young people develop skills – both leadership and
technical.
Our Library is supporting the INZONE Career Information
Kiosk initiative. This is aimed at helping young people identify
suitable career options.
Create a Growth-Enhancing Tax System
Tax legislation and practice are constantly changing and it can
be a challenge within a small council to maintain the level of
knowledge required to ensure compliance with the various
tax acts. In November 2009 we commissioned Toovey Eaton
McDonald Ltd to review our tax compliance. They were
impressed with the overall level of compliance. A number of
technical and relatively minor observations were made as part
of the review for staff to action.
39
www.hurunui.govt.nz
Water Management
Canterbury Initiatives and Background
Water in Canterbury is a very topical and potentially
controversial issue, subject to many studies and public scrutiny.
The most wide ranging review in Canterbury to date has been
the Canterbury Strategic Water Study (CSWS). Stage 1 of the
CSWS, undertaken by Lincoln Environmental in response to
the severe drought of 1998 and published in 2002, concluded
that on an annual basis there is sufficient water in Canterbury
to meet likely future demand and development, but that there
were seasonal and geographic mismatches between supply and
demand. The initial study concluded that water storage and
distribution should be considered as part of meeting future
demands for water, to supplement supply in times of low natural
flows.
Under the auspices of the Canterbury Mayoral Forum, and
facilitated by Crown and local funding, the CSWS progressed
from 2004 through to 2008, respectively identifying a wide range
of potential water storage sites (Stage 2), and then undertaking
initial high level desk top evaluations of a more limited
number of major storage options (Stage 3). These evaluations
incorporated environmental, social, cultural, recreational and
economic viewpoints and included multi stakeholder group
meetings. Stage 3 concluded that a range of issues, opportunities,
trade-offs and concerns would need to be considered and
managed for any of the storage options to be taken further. Of
all the options considered, the Hurunui catchment option (up
to 68,000 hectares of irrigated land) was seen to be perhaps the
most viable hydrologically, albeit not without other issues and
concerns for some stakeholders.
The CSWS findings were subsequently put on hold (from mid-
2008), while wider social, environmental and economic aspects
were canvassed in a structured feedback process (in late 2008).
The Canterbury Strategic Water Study itself was renamed
‘Canterbury Water Management Strategy’ (CWMS) as it moved
through Stage 4 reviews, which culminated in public consultation
in May 2009. This eventually resulted in the publication of the
finalised strategy in October and adopted by the Council in
November 2009.
The Wider Scene & Context:
A Hurunui Perspective
New Zealand’s GDP and national prosperity continues to
be based on primary production and exports from the land.
Recent developments at all levels seem to suggest that the
country’s reliance on its land based economy will become even
greater in the years ahead. Hurunui has a traditional focus on
grass fed food and fibre production, and the present and future
prosperity of our communities, and their wellbeing on all fronts,
relies on Hurunui continuing to play to this traditional primary
sector strength.
The downside effects of the severe droughts of the late 1990s
(which in fact triggered the initial Canterbury Strategic Water
Study) are testimony to the risk of “doing nothing” with
regard to future proofing our land based production, and our
community prosperity. These same droughts, and downturns
in the agricultural economy, led to major visible decline in
Hurunui’s rural townships, and the implementation of a Hurunui
Tourism strategy was one of the responses. Given the pressures
of the global economy, and international tourism outlook, it is
highly unlikely that tourism in Hurunui could be the platform for
widespread prosperity across all communities and sectors, going
forward. Although tourism will be important, it will not replace
traditional primary production. Further, it must be remembered
that our tourism model is land based, given the attractions of
our striking landscapes, the traditional North Canterbury rural
character and values, the unique Hanmer Springs alpine spa
village, viticulture in the Waipara Valley, and more.
We believe that this issue of prosperity and the critical
importance of our land based industries and exports, is even
more important than many New Zealanders presently realise.
World food production is coming under increasing pressure
from the competing interests of bio-fuel production, climate
change, world population increase, socio economic growth and
development in countries such as India and China….”our planet
and global communities need high quality food in ever increasing
volumes, and New Zealand’s key role, historically, presently and
into the future, is as an efficient and sustainable food producer
and exporter. Such exports will be crucial to provide for New
Zealand’s import hungry lifestyle and prosperity for all”.
The subject of water is therefore of major importance to us.
Given the drought prone nature of the Hurunui, we believe
the future prosperity of the district can only be assured with
reliable sources of water to irrigate and support an increasing
proportion of its “food and fibre” producing farmland. Further,
there is also an on-going challenge for us to provide plentiful
domestic and stock water supplies and to meet New Zealand’s
drinking water standards.
We firmly believe that this Long Term Plan represents the best
opportunity to demonstrate a sense of leadership, by continuing
to support the CWMS through the Hurunui-Waiau Zone
committee.
Hurunui – Waiau Zone Committee
In July 2010, the Hurunui Waiau Zone Committee was formed
as a joint committee of the Hurunui District Council and
Environment Canterbury. This committee was the first of the
Canterbury formed ‘Zone Committees’ to be established as part
of the broader Canterbury Water Management Strategy. The
Hurunui Waiau Zone Committee has worked collaboratively
40
Hurunui Community Long Term Plan 2012 - 2022
to develop recommendations on water management in as
described in the Zone Implementation Programme (ZIP). See
a summary of the ZIP appended to this Plan. A full copy is
available on our Council website.
The Zone Committee and this ZIP are part of implementing
the Canterbury Water Management Strategy (CWMS) in
the Hurunui Waiau Zone. The CWMS sets as its first order
priorities: environment, customary use, community supplies
and stock water; with second order priorities as irrigation,
renewable electricity generation, recreation and amenity. The
Zone Committee recognizes that clean drinking water, land use,
water quality and quantity, environmental flows and allocation
for the rivers, biodiversity protection and enhancement,
irrigation, hydro power development and water storage options,
and the principles of kaitiakitanga are all (intimately) interrelated
and must be considered as a whole rather than in isolation. The
ZIP recommends actions and approaches for collaborative
and integrated water management solutions to achieve the
CWMS vision, “to enable present and future generations to
gain the greatest economic, environmental, recreational and
cultural benefits from our water resources”. In accordance
with the CWMS, the Zone Committee has arrived at its
recommendations through consensus.
Drinking Water Quality
Under this Strategy, we fully acknowledge that our focus on
productive development must be matched with a similar
energy and commitment to drinking water standards. See
the ‘Key Issues’ and ‘Water Supply’ sections of this plan for a
comprehensive explanation of our intentions to address this
issue across the Hurunui district.
Land and Water Quality Use Research
Council will continue to support initiatives, with Enterprise
North Canterbury and Environment Canterbury, and other
appropriate agencies, to position Hurunui at the forefront of
land use and water quality research programmes, projects and
pilots in the interests of Hurunui and all rural New Zealand. We
believe Hurunui is well placed to pursue this lead role, especially
given our dry east coast climate and our strong relationships
with entrepreneurial landowners and agencies. We believe that
this is a critically important component of our overall strategic
and comprehensive approach, particularly to demonstrate that
the Hurunui Water Management Strategy in relation to storage
and irrigation will require landowners to commit to best
industry practise and the uptake of available science.
Environmental, Social and
Recreational Interests
The environmental, social and recreational values of our
rivers and lakes are critical to the Hurunui. This point cannot
be overemphasised. We fully recognise this and support the
concept of having healthy rivers, lakes and streams in the
district. We have established a close working relationship with
the Department of Conservation, Environment Canterbury
and Ngai Tahu, and are extending this to other agencies and
interest groups on both a general and case specific basis. (e.g.
Our present work on the Waipara River is an example of our
commitment to play a proactive role in facilitating solutions
balancing environmental, recreational and other interests.)
Advocacy
It should be clear from this strategy that we see the Hurunui
Water Management Strategy as a critical component that has
the potential to influence, positively or negatively, every aspect
of wellbeing and prosperity in this district. Accordingly, we are
committed to pursue every advocacy role we can, in support of
the Hurunui Water Management Strategy. In particular, we will:
• Continue to play a positive, proactive part in the
Canterbury Water Management Strategy
• Lobby Government to position any water development
project that meet the aims of the ZIP as important
infrastructure developments, in the interests of Hurunui,
Canterbury and NZ
• Maintain and/or build relationships with all key
stakeholders and interest groups
Conclusion:
The Key Principle of “Balance”
This section on Water Management as outlined has been
deliberately included to recognise the importance of the
strategic issue of water. We cannot over emphasise the key
principle of balance that we firmly believe must be achieved if
true prosperity for all is to result. This is not a strategy about
irrigation and land use development at any cost. It is equally
not a strategy about locking up our resources and assets for
the benefit of a few, whoever they may be. The guiding themes
of the Hurunui Water Management Strategy are responsible
and sustainable growth and development for Hurunui and the
prosperity of its communities. At the same time, it is to also
protect natural and traditional environmental and recreational
values, and a commitment to pursuing and applying best
practice land use and water quality research, scientific advances
41
www.hurunui.govt.nz
in water use efficiency and water conservation. Hurunui is at
the forefront of this balanced, comprehensive and critically
important strategy. That is the role we are engaged in with our
community’s support and encouragement.
Hurunui River - Acrylic on Canvas - by Stella Sales
42
Hurunui Community Long Term Plan 2012 - 2022
Sustainability
• Walking and Cycling Strategy – the intention is to
develop a series of linking walking and cycling tracks in
Introduction
the District
Sustainability is a key ideal of the Local Government Act
2002 which sets out the requirements for taking a sustainable
development approach, and advises that we should take into
account the social, economic, and cultural wellbeing of people
and communities; the need to maintain and enhance the quality
of the environment; and the reasonably foreseeable needs of
future generations.
These factors are relevant to most of our policies and activities,
and where appropriate, we will explicitly address the ideal of
sustainability in relation to these.
They also tie in with some climate change issues that merit
some discussion here. We are mindful of trends in these areas,
and will aim for compliance with any central government
initiatives, but the Hurunui District has long been subject to
adverse weather events, and we do not see climate change as a
matter of top priority.
This Plan
Sustainability issues are discussed throughout the Council
Activities chapter of this plan where they are explicitly addressed
as the “significant negative effects” and “sustainability”. In the
Policies section of this plan, the topic of sustainability is raised in
the Significance Policy, in which the current and future wellness
of the community is taken into consideration in determining
whether or not any issue is significant. It is also raised in the
Revenue & Financing policy, in which the sustainability of the
means of funding each Council service is considered.
“Environmental Responsibility” is a key desire expressed
through one of our community outcomes in this plan. This
outcome is described as:
A Place that Demonstrates Environmental Responsibility:
• We protect our environment while preserving people’s
property rights
• We minimise solid waste to the fullest extent, and
manage the rest in a sustainable way
Other Initiatives
We have a number of bylaws, strategies and other policies which
consider sustainable environmental issues. These include our:
• Biodiversity Strategy – this aims to ensure that the unique
natural values of the district are maintained and enhanced
by the council, landowners and other parties working
together in partnership, voluntarily and cooperatively, in a
non-regulatory framework
43
• Hurunui Waiau Zone Implementation Programme
– the summary of this programme is included in the
appendices of this Long Term Plan
• Smoke Free Outdoors Strategy (which is under
development) – this is to encourage smoke free
outdoor areas in a non-regulatory manner
• Pegasus Bay Bylaw – aims to control activities and the
use of land, including camping, the use of horses and the
use of vehicles, on the foreshore, beaches and adjacent
areas of Northern Pegasus Bay to protect the important
natural values of the coastline.
• Freedom Camping Bylaw – encourages people to
freedom camp in a responsible manner and in designated
areas to protect the environment from harm
• Earthquake Strengthening Policy – sets out criteria to
make buildings more likely to withstand earthquakes.
The Canterbury earthquakes in 2010/11 have focused
our attention on the potential for earthquake prone
buildings in the District and we are in the process of
reviewing these now.
Climate Change
A “once in 50 year flood” on 30/31 July 2008 and a “once in 25
year flood” on 26 August 2008 caused widespread damage to
roads, fences, floodgates and tracks. This was compounded by
the fact that the floods came not long after a major drought,
due to which many farmers were already struggling financially.
The Ministry for the Environment warns us to expect an
increase in the frequency of such extreme weather events, and
compounding factors such as rising sea levels, due to “climate
change” brought about by “human activity increasing the natural
level of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere”.
This is a controversial topic, but whether or not the floods and
drought were caused by climate change, and whether or not
such climate change is primarily due to human influences (there
is much debate about this, even amongst the “experts”), it is
clear that we need to be prepared to respond to such events in
order for farming and other key activities in the District to be
economically and environmentally sustainable.
Potential sea level rise is also an issue we have to grapple with in
the District Plan review. Some of our small coastal settlements
are likely to be inundated, but the time frame for when such sea
level rises may impact is dependent on updated research and
modelling.
www.hurunui.govt.nz
Emissions Trading / Carbon Tax
The Emissions Trading Scheme was a central government driven
initiative aimed at moving New Zealand towards compliance
with international protocols for offsetting the human influenced
drivers of climate change. With the recent change of government
there has been some discussion as to whether a “carbon tax”
might be a more effective way of achieving this end.
Either way, it is likely that in the near future some financial
compensation will be required from industries that produce
emissions. In the Hurunui District, forestry and farming stand
to be most affected, but until the details of the Emissions Trading
Scheme (or carbon tax) are finalised, it is difficult to say precisely
what the impact upon these industries will be. Federated Farmers
have staff dedicated to monitoring and producing responses to
these issues, and should be able to provide reliable advice to
farmers on these matters in the coming years.
44