27.10.2014 Views

Download - Dental Asia

Download - Dental Asia

Download - Dental Asia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CLINICALFEATURE<br />

Main Problems in the RPD<br />

(Kennedy Class 1& 2)<br />

Instability<br />

The mandibular free-end distal extension RPD rests on both<br />

fixed and soft tissues.<br />

Consequently the RPD tends to<br />

rotate around a single place and<br />

move down on the soft<br />

underlying tissues. In a distal<br />

extension RPD case with one or<br />

more anterior teeth missing, the<br />

anterior part goes down as the<br />

posterior part goes up and vieversa:<br />

this is the “teeter-totter<br />

phenomenon. (Figure 1)<br />

Figure 1 (top & bottom) Lateral<br />

and horizontal movements of the<br />

frame<br />

Rocking can not only occur in a<br />

vertical plane but often also in a<br />

horizontal plane causing the wellknown<br />

internal posterior soars<br />

(Figure 2). RPD instability will<br />

develop unbalanced forces that<br />

will have consequence to slowly<br />

mobilizing the supporting teeth<br />

until they have to be pulled out. 4<br />

Usually the new missing teeth is<br />

already replaced and the clasp<br />

displaced to the next proximal<br />

teeth; increasing in this way the<br />

distal extension span, “a domino<br />

effect”.<br />

Carious Destruction of the Abutments<br />

Only a few of the most carious resistant teeth can survive the<br />

environmental changes brought by the presence of a clasp-type<br />

ackers and the constant food impaction between the saddle –<br />

guiding plane and the distal aspect of the teeth. (Figure 3)<br />

Destruction of Abutments by<br />

Periodontal Diseases<br />

A well known fact is the destructive potential of a RPD as<br />

consequence of the amplitude of the denture movement and<br />

the clasp mechanism which transfer these movements toward<br />

the abutment teeth. This suggests our analysis about the<br />

denture basis and its relationship to the denture instability. 5<br />

1. The Soft Tissue Support.<br />

Especially in the large distal extension cases, a very large<br />

mucosal support is recommended in order o provides the<br />

widest support under the saddle. The inaccuracy of the cast by<br />

a simple alginate impression, or an inadequate functional<br />

impression would produce negative consequences on the<br />

fitness of the final acrylic basis. (Figure 4)<br />

2. Altrough with good<br />

impression both anatomic<br />

and functional of the basis<br />

by the “altered cast<br />

technique “they are slight<br />

movement in function<br />

before that the basis<br />

reaches the rock-bottom<br />

of incompressibility of the<br />

soft underlying structures.<br />

Such kinds of movement<br />

in a simple clasp RPD<br />

drops the basis onto the<br />

soft tissue not in a<br />

simultaneous vertical<br />

drop, BUT act as a hinging<br />

mechanism or fulcrum<br />

around which the denture<br />

tips down in distal part and<br />

up in the mesial part.<br />

Stress breakers,<br />

Stress Equalizers,<br />

Trauma Absorbing<br />

Figure 2 (top & bottom) Internal<br />

Posterior lingual soars area<br />

These devices are promoted on the fact that they should allow<br />

to the denture basis to move slightly without straining on the<br />

abutment. There are mainly two types of stress-breakers:<br />

A. The most commons are the hinge type stress-breakers<br />

(Figures 5a & 5b). This concept provide a disarticulation<br />

between the basis and the retentive apparatus (clasp and<br />

precision attachment), but act only on vertical occlusal forces,<br />

they have no incidence in the lateral occlusal movements. 6<br />

B. Other stress breakers like the ball-and-socket type allow<br />

essentially the same tipping action and add to it lateral mobility<br />

which tends to allow lateral or rolling mobility and also some<br />

bucco-lingual rolling. (Figures 6a & 6b)<br />

In the two cases, the problem remain in terms that the stressbreaking<br />

leaves the denture basis in much the same situation<br />

with a fulcrum acting a few millimeters distally and much freer<br />

in its movement because the absence of retentive clasps. In<br />

addition this type of device allows an excessive space for the<br />

vertical drop and causes infra-occlusion on the posterior teeth<br />

and consequently an overloading of the anterior remaining<br />

teeth. Taking into the consideration the severe bone resorption<br />

in senior patients, this will be a major weakness of the system.<br />

(Combination Syndrome) (Figure 7a)<br />

The sequel of this action in particularly when bone resorption<br />

frequently occurs, is the continuing rocking of the denture when<br />

loaded occlusally. The rests of the last abutment are in this<br />

case acting as fulcrums. This phenomena establishes a selfperpetuating<br />

or rather a self-worsening situation where more<br />

36 <strong>Dental</strong> <strong>Asia</strong> • May / June 2008

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!