- Page 1: EISS 9 Empirical Issues in Syntax a
- Page 5: Preface The ninth volume of the ser
- Page 8 and 9: contexts; we provide experimental e
- Page 10 and 11: which we included random intercepts
- Page 12 and 13: • Locality condition: The proposi
- Page 14 and 15: [[(1B′)]] f = {invite(john, x) |
- Page 16 and 17: focus projection, and require that
- Page 18 and 19: The term ‘root clause’ was intr
- Page 20 and 21: pared the degree of metrical promin
- Page 22 and 23: Focus in situ + negative tag Focus
- Page 24 and 25: Horvath, Julia. 2010. “Discourse-
- Page 26 and 27: languages: Hungarian (H) and Romani
- Page 28 and 29: attach-wh usually licenses a single
- Page 30 and 31: on’ requires an overt preposition
- Page 32 and 33: of syntactic priming: the stricter
- Page 34 and 35: (43) Nu văd cum și, mai important
- Page 36 and 37: for certain values to be identical
- Page 38 and 39: ing the CNJ-LST proposed for coordi
- Page 40 and 41: oth of these cases, as well as the
- Page 42 and 43: References Abeillé, Anne. 2005. Le
- Page 44 and 45: the addressee by virtue of linguist
- Page 46 and 47: dressee is enticed by the imperativ
- Page 48 and 49: some way. She notes that it is not
- Page 50 and 51: . A: Give me an aspirin! B: # I don
- Page 52 and 53:
Effective preference structures can
- Page 54 and 55:
the content gets realized (i.e. he
- Page 56 and 57:
to the principle in (39), which aim
- Page 58 and 59:
Kaufmann follows the second strateg
- Page 60 and 61:
5. Portner 2005, 2007: a dedicated
- Page 62 and 63:
to realize the imperative once he a
- Page 64 and 65:
epresentation and defeasible reason
- Page 66 and 67:
equative reading can be paraphrased
- Page 68 and 69:
‘the greatest French soldier’ t
- Page 70 and 71:
2.4. Plurals 2.4.1. Plural definite
- Page 72 and 73:
group of people constituting the on
- Page 74 and 75:
3. A(n) sole/*only The solution to
- Page 76 and 77:
ichest i : richest ii :: only : sol
- Page 78 and 79:
In the case of a singular definite
- Page 80 and 81:
The lexical entries we have given f
- Page 82 and 83:
Strawson, P. F. 1950. On referring.
- Page 84 and 85:
In this paper, I show that a dialec
- Page 86 and 87:
(3) […] argretter, qu’dins ch
- Page 88 and 89:
2.3. Are there any restrictions on
- Page 90 and 91:
stand to the right of que2, which,
- Page 92 and 93:
heads FinP (Bovetto 2002, López 20
- Page 94 and 95:
(24) a. j’prétinds qu’à l’h
- Page 96 and 97:
. *T’as raison Colas, faut tacher
- Page 98 and 99:
6. Conclusion This paper shows that
- Page 100 and 101:
Appendix Frequency of DCC for embed
- Page 102 and 103:
In this paper, I provide empirical
- Page 104 and 105:
subjects are realized in a cleft to
- Page 106 and 107:
problem with the examples in (11),
- Page 108 and 109:
continuations chosen after exclusiv
- Page 110 and 111:
The questions were of two forms: ei
- Page 112 and 113:
quantified lexical subject any elem
- Page 114 and 115:
QUD:Qui a corrigé les copies? SF S
- Page 116 and 117:
Finally, the ranking proposed, with
- Page 118 and 119:
Onea, Edgar, and David Beaver. 2011
- Page 120 and 121:
semantics of these constructions ha
- Page 122 and 123:
filter. A quantifier like two sailo
- Page 124 and 125:
are not principal filters, can be c
- Page 126 and 127:
(22) monotone increasing NPs like a
- Page 128 and 129:
the equation of the formulas in (27
- Page 130 and 131:
presuppose the non-emptiness of the
- Page 132 and 133:
tune with the well-known observatio
- Page 134 and 135:
Keenan, Edward. 1996. The semantics
- Page 136 and 137:
(2) Paul veut que nous {soyons SUBJ
- Page 138 and 139:
(8) Le professeur subodore que les
- Page 140 and 141:
• verbs describing a course of ac
- Page 142 and 143:
The semantico-pragmatic condition h
- Page 144 and 145:
force is stronger than that of the
- Page 146 and 147:
dire (‘say’) or suggérer (‘s
- Page 148 and 149:
However, it must be stressed that t
- Page 150 and 151:
If it is the case that those moves
- Page 152 and 153:
certain environments. Again, the re
- Page 154 and 155:
Gross, Maurice. 1978. Correspondanc
- Page 156 and 157:
Semantically, the difference betwee
- Page 158 and 159:
(14) a. Descriptive meaning of (13)
- Page 160 and 161:
What is crucial here is that the en
- Page 162 and 163:
(30) a. Heute steigt sau die coole
- Page 164 and 165:
In the following, we will give a te
- Page 166 and 167:
These contrasts in their syntactic
- Page 168 and 169:
(50) [ QP je- [ DP der [ NP Student
- Page 170 and 171:
degree expression out of a seemingl
- Page 172 and 173:
969264437.pdf. Koopman, Hilda, and
- Page 174 and 175:
semantic representation and computa
- Page 176 and 177:
NP [AGR=[PERS=3,NUM=sing]] John S N
- Page 178 and 179:
Class CanSubj S Class DirObj VP Cla
- Page 180 and 181:
a. ⎡ ⎤ causation [ ] activity C
- Page 182 and 183:
lexical meaning PO pattern DO patte
- Page 184 and 185:
⎡ ⎤ a. S causation [ ] NP [I= 1
- Page 186 and 187:
Class VSpine syntactic dimension VP
- Page 188 and 189:
sends ⎡ ⎤ causation EFFECTOR 8
- Page 190 and 191:
Crabbé, Benoit. 2005. Grammatical
- Page 192 and 193:
Claim 2. Semantic composition of ve
- Page 194 and 195:
(7) yo-k2nol-ú 3Z/N.SG.PAT-rain-ST
- Page 196 and 197:
inanimate are not selected by verba
- Page 198 and 199:
in (25), or from transitive to intr
- Page 200 and 201:
(26) a. ⎡ ⎤ English-transitive-
- Page 202 and 203:
Abstracting away from the particula
- Page 204 and 205:
As shown by the statement of the no
- Page 206 and 207:
(36) Áhs2 ni-ka-nláht-a-ke 2-té-
- Page 208 and 209:
coincident and dualic prefixes, mea
- Page 210 and 211:
aises, of course, the question of w
- Page 213 and 214:
A finer look at predicate decomposi
- Page 215 and 216:
kill is compatible with wide variet
- Page 217 and 218:
Do these relations correspond to di
- Page 219 and 220:
paper. The wider claim is that sube
- Page 221 and 222:
More significantly, all involve dir
- Page 223 and 224:
assume a syntactic view of event st
- Page 225 and 226:
other heads. Secondly, spell-out pa
- Page 227 and 228:
Finally, (53) shows the inchoative
- Page 229 and 230:
⏟ AA ⏟ (61) [ v P … v TR [ Ak
- Page 231 and 232:
Negation-resistant polarity items A
- Page 233 and 234:
To summarize, these indefinites can
- Page 235 and 236:
covert alternative-sensitive operat
- Page 237 and 238:
(17) a. any book = ∃x∈D. x is a
- Page 239 and 240:
tion, negative quantifiers and with
- Page 241 and 242:
Since PPIs are endowed with the [+D
- Page 243 and 244:
4.5. Extra-clausal negation A cruci
- Page 245 and 246:
What this data shows us is that PPI
- Page 247 and 248:
Prima facie it appears to be the ca