28.10.2014 Views

Slow-Release Nitrogen Fertilizers and Nitrogen Additives for Field ...

Slow-Release Nitrogen Fertilizers and Nitrogen Additives for Field ...

Slow-Release Nitrogen Fertilizers and Nitrogen Additives for Field ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Transform your PDFs into Flipbooks and boost your revenue!

Leverage SEO-optimized Flipbooks, powerful backlinks, and multimedia content to professionally showcase your products and significantly increase your reach.

<strong>Slow</strong>-<strong>Release</strong> <strong>Nitrogen</strong> <strong>Fertilizers</strong><br />

<strong>and</strong> <strong>Nitrogen</strong> <strong>Additives</strong><br />

<strong>for</strong> <strong>Field</strong> Crops<br />

Dave Franzen<br />

North Dakota State University


<strong>Nitrogen</strong> Management-<br />

The problem that has built<br />

many careers


Ammonia volatilization from urea<br />

Nitrification<br />

Denitrification


<strong>Nitrogen</strong> use efficiency-<br />

Worldwide about 33% NUE<br />

(Raun <strong>and</strong> Johnson, 1999)


Spring Wheat N timeline<br />

Application<br />

Period of greatest uptake<br />

Day 1 Day 30 Day 60 Day 90


Corn N timeline<br />

Application<br />

Period of greatest uptake<br />

Day 1 Day 45 Day 80 Day 120


-Nitrification inhibitors<br />

-Urease inhibitor additives<br />

-Nitrification <strong>and</strong> urease inhibitor<br />

-Urease inhibition through chemical binding<br />

with urea as applied with slow-release properties<br />

-Urease inhibition through physical separation<br />

of urea from soil


Nitrification inhibitors-<br />

N-Serve®<br />

nitrapyrin (2-chloro-6-[trichloromethyl] pyridine)<br />

DCD, dicy<strong>and</strong>iamide


Spring N,Touchton<br />

et al., 1978<br />

Fall N, Touchton et al., 1978


Some studies showed a yield increase with<br />

N-Serve, while others showed no yield<br />

increase. Yield increases were more a<br />

result of weather between application <strong>and</strong> N<br />

uptake rather than per<strong>for</strong>mance of the product.<br />

Yield increases over the seven years in Minnesota<br />

were 15 bushels per acre more <strong>for</strong> fall<br />

anhydrous ammonia + N-Serve over fall<br />

anhydrous ammonia alone, <strong>and</strong> 27 bushels per<br />

acre more <strong>for</strong> spring anhydrous ammonia<br />

compared to fall anhydrous ammonia<br />

(R<strong>and</strong>all et al., 2008).


Instinct ® is a new <strong>for</strong>mulation of<br />

Nitrapyrin that can be mixed with<br />

ammonium fertilizers <strong>and</strong> can stay on the<br />

soil surface without incorporation.<br />

Research so far at Minnesota, Illinois,<br />

Iowa <strong>and</strong> Nebraska have shown no yield<br />

benefit to the use of Instinct over N<br />

fertilizer alone, although the product<br />

inhibits nitrification<br />

(Kentucky, Schwab, unpublished data)


Wisconsin-<br />

Corn yield increase with Instinct in<br />

2008, but not 2009.


DCD<br />

No. of comparisons<br />

With<br />

Total significant<br />

advantage<br />

Average<br />

response<br />

%<br />

Timing<br />

Fall 4 1 +1.6<br />

Spring 15 3 +3.4<br />

Sidedress 3 1 +1.4<br />

N Source<br />

Ammonium sulfate 2 0 -1.0<br />

Anhydrous<br />

ammonia<br />

6 1 +3.6<br />

Urea 4 4 +2.2<br />

From Malzer et al., 1989


Yield increases with DCD<br />

were more consistently achieved<br />

in potato in the Malzer survey.


NBPT (N-(n-butyl) thiophosphoric acid triamide)<br />

Agrotain<br />

Competes <strong>for</strong> active sites on the urease<br />

enzyme <strong>and</strong> ties up activity <strong>for</strong> about 10 days,<br />

depending on weather conditions.


Effect of seed-placed urea with <strong>and</strong> without Agrotain,<br />

on st<strong>and</strong> density <strong>and</strong> grain yield of barley on a fine s<strong>and</strong>y loam<br />

soil, 1994-96. (From Grant, 2004).<br />

N rate, lb/acre St<strong>and</strong>, plants/foot Yield, bu/acre<br />

No<br />

Agrotain<br />

Agrotain<br />

No<br />

Agrotain<br />

Agrotain<br />

0 7.6 7.6 50 50<br />

18 7.9 8.2 55 52<br />

36 7.3 7.7 53 62<br />

54 6.0 7.1 59 57<br />

72 5.7 7.1 63 61<br />

89 4.7 7.1 57 65


Yield <strong>for</strong> side-dressed no-till corn in Hardin County, KY.<br />

(From Schwab <strong>and</strong> Murdock, 2009)<br />

Treatment<br />

Yield, bushels per acre<br />

Check (50 lb N/acre preplant<br />

N only) 117d*<br />

Urea<br />

158c<br />

Urea + Agrotain<br />

201b<br />

SuperU<br />

201b<br />

UAN<br />

150c<br />

UAN + Agrotain<br />

179bc<br />

UAN + Agrotain Plus<br />

175bc<br />

Ammonium nitrate<br />

239a


Indiana- Purdue, unpublished work by<br />

Phillips, Mengel <strong>and</strong> Walker, 1989.<br />

Corn Yield<br />

bu/acre<br />

Urea surface applied 130<br />

Urea surface applied +Agrotain 143


Illinois, average of four southern Illinois<br />

locations, Varsa et al., 1999.<br />

Corn Yield<br />

bu/acre<br />

Urea surface applied 106<br />

Urea surface applied +Agrotain 125


Nitrification <strong>and</strong> urease inhibitors<br />

Ammonium thiosulfate<br />

Nutrisphere ®


ATS has nitrification <strong>and</strong> urease inhibiting<br />

properties.<br />

It is not as effective generally as nitrapyrin, DCD,<br />

or NBPT.<br />

ATS is most effective as a nitrification inhibitor<br />

at concentrations of 25 ppm S (About 0.1% ATS).<br />

Under warm conditions (>60 o F), mineralization<br />

is complete in a week.<br />

Under cooler temperatures, mineralization is<br />

slower; about 3 weeks.


In a fall application of aqua ammonia with ATS<br />

compared with nitrapyrin, similar ammonia<br />

concentration was found in the spring<br />

with the two products (Goos <strong>and</strong> Johnson, 1999.)


ATS affects the both steps of<br />

nitrification- ammonium to nitrate<br />

<strong>and</strong> nitrite to nitrate.<br />

Higher than recommended concentrations<br />

of ATS can result in an accumulation of<br />

nitrite. Studies that used the<br />

recommended concentration of ATS<br />

did not see an accumulation of nitrite.


Nutrisphere,<br />

SFP Specialty Products, LLC, Leawood, KS<br />

Formulation <strong>for</strong> dry fertilizer-<br />

30-60% maleic-itoconic copolymer,<br />

pH 2.5-5<br />

Formulation <strong>for</strong> liquid fertilizer-<br />

40% maleic-itoconic copolymer, pH 1-2


Product literature states that nitrification<br />

inhibition is based on product ability<br />

to tie-up copper- a critical metal used<br />

by nitrification bacteria.<br />

Inhibition of urease activity is due<br />

theoretically to a tie-up of soil nickela<br />

critical metal constituent of urease<br />

enzyme.


Effects of N additive, averaged over source (UAN <strong>and</strong> urea) <strong>and</strong> N<br />

rate on corn grain yield, earleaf-N <strong>and</strong> grain-N, Sc<strong>and</strong>ia, KS<br />

(2-year average). From Gordon, 2008.<br />

Treatment Yield, bu/acre Earleaf N, % Grain N, %<br />

Check 152 1.72 1.13<br />

Urea/UAN 168 2.57 1.26<br />

ESN 185 2.96 1.33<br />

Nutrisphere-N 183 2.96 1.35<br />

Agrotain 183 2.98 1.36<br />

LSD 5% 6 0.09 0.04


(Research by R.J. Goos, in Franzen et al., J. Plant Nut 2010?)


(Research by R.J. Goos, in Franzen et al., J. Plant Nut 2010?)


Cumulative ammonia volatilization losses <strong>for</strong> urea, ammonium<br />

sulfate, urea + NBPT, <strong>and</strong> urea + 0.25% Nutrisphere (NSN)<br />

from a Dewitt silt loam soil during a 15-day laboratory incubation<br />

at 25°C. (Norman data, University Arkansas, Fayetteville,<br />

from Franzen et al., 2010?)<br />

N sources<br />

Days after N source application<br />

3 7 11 15<br />

Cumulative NH 3 loss, % of N applied<br />

Urea 14.5 35.9 51.8 56.9<br />

Ammonium sulfate 0.1 0.2 0.5 0.6<br />

Urea + NBPT † 0.006 2.7 12.9 18.3<br />

Urea + 0.25% NSN 17.6 42.2 57.8 62.7<br />

LSD(0.05) ‡<br />

LSD(0.05) § 12.2<br />

9.6


Laboratory studies clearly show that<br />

Nutrisphere has no nitrification or urease<br />

inhibiting properties. What is most curious<br />

is why some studies show some response.<br />

No Response Positive<br />

North Dakota 8 0<br />

Kansas 7 5 (4 at Sc<strong>and</strong>ia)<br />

Minnesota 2 0<br />

Illinois 3 1<br />

Arkansas/Mississippi 3 0<br />

Montana work on barley showed a yield increase,<br />

but no increase in N uptake.


One possible reason <strong>for</strong> the yield increase<br />

is the pH of the product, particularly with<br />

the liquid <strong>for</strong>mulation. Acid pH lowers the<br />

rate of nitrification. Perhaps it is not<br />

the Nutrisphere that is active. Perhaps it is<br />

its acidity?


Urease inhibitors through chemical binding with<br />

urea <strong>and</strong> slow-release properties<br />

Nitramin- Triazole-methyl urea<br />

CoRon (19.6% methyl-urea, methyl-diurea,<br />

urea (8.6%)<br />

N-Pact (9.6%) Methyl-triazole, urea (17.4%)


Effect of Georgia-Pacific 43-0-0 Nitramin amended urea compared to<br />

urea surface applied in no-till spring wheat, 2008 near Valley City,<br />

ND. Franzen, unpublished data.<br />

Treatment<br />

Lb Yield, Protein, %<br />

N/acre bu/acre<br />

Check 0 38 12.1<br />

Urea 30 46 12.4<br />

60 51 13.3<br />

90 57 14.1<br />

120 63 15.1<br />

Urea +Nitramin 43-0-0 30 45 12.7<br />

60 57 13.3<br />

90 60 14.4<br />

120 58 15.0<br />

LSD 5% 6 0.7


South Dakota work on Nitramin blends<br />

found no increase in corn yields in 2007,<br />

or spring wheat yield in 2008, but grain<br />

protein was increased in 2008, suggesting<br />

some slow-release properties by the<br />

fertilizer.<br />

(Bly <strong>and</strong> Gelderman, 2008;2009)


Application of 2 gallon per acre 30-0-0 Nitramin at several barley<br />

growth stages near Valley City, ND, 2008. Franzen, 2009.<br />

Treatment<br />

Yield,<br />

bu/acre<br />

Protein,<br />

%<br />

Check 117 13.4<br />

2-leaf 125 12.8<br />

Early jointing 116 13.3<br />

Boot 109 13.3<br />

Anthesis 119 13.2<br />

LSD % 6 NS


Similar applications of Nitramin to<br />

spring wheat had no positive effect<br />

on wheat yield or protein..<br />

Applications of N-Pact at the 4-5 leaf<br />

stage or post-anthesis had no effect<br />

on grain yield or protein at rates of<br />

2-3 gal/acre


Valley City, 2008, 0-2-3 gal/a N-Pact 5-6 leaf<br />

yield with preplant N rate- urea


Valley City, N-Pact 5-6 leaf, flag-leaf N after<br />

preplant urea, 2008.


Valley City protein response to 5-leaf N-Pact<br />

application over preplant urea rates, 2008.


Yield response from post-anthesis application<br />

N-Pact, 3 gal/acre over preplant urea. Valley<br />

City, 2008.


Protein response of post-anthesis N-Pact<br />

application, 3 gal/acre. Valley City, 2008<br />

Only point of increase


Effect of foliar treatment of spring wheat near<br />

Valley City, on yield, test weight <strong>and</strong> protein, 2008<br />

Treatment Yield Test weight Protein<br />

Check 68.3 58.2 12.5<br />

3.5 leaf 1 gal/a 65.7 58.0 11.9<br />

3.5 leaf 3 gal/a 66.3 57.9 12.5<br />

Early joint 1 gal/a 60.2 57.7 13.0<br />

Early joint 3 gal/a 57.5 57.0 11.2<br />

Early boot 1 gal/a 67.3 58.2 13.4<br />

Early boot 3 gal/a 62.2 57.3 11.8<br />

Flowering 1 gal/a 59.0 57.4 11.9<br />

Flowering 3 gal/a 65.5 57.5 12.5<br />

LSD 5% NS NS NS


2009 Carrington, ave. 2 sites, post-anthesis<br />

application <strong>for</strong> protein enhancement. Schatz<br />

15<br />

14.5<br />

14<br />

13.5<br />

Irr Faller<br />

Lebsock<br />

average<br />

13<br />

untreated<br />

check<br />

10 gal UAN 12 gal Coron 2 gal Coron<br />

Faller yields over 100 bu/acre<br />

Slide courtesy of Greg<br />

Endres, NDSU, Carrington REC


Urease inhibition through physical<br />

separation of urea from soil<br />

These are fertilizers with physical<br />

coatings. The most common fertilizer<br />

of this type being marketed across the<br />

region is ESN by Agrium


Illinois-<br />

4 locations over 12 years, ESN was similar<br />

in corn yield to urea + Agrotain, <strong>and</strong> 3 bu/a<br />

higher in yield than urea alone.<br />

In 4 years of no-till, ESN was 21 bu/a better<br />

than urea surface-applied.<br />

(Ebelhar et al., 2010)


Minnesota-<br />

3 different ESN application methodsdeep<br />

b<strong>and</strong> (4 inches), broadcast incorporated<br />

fall <strong>and</strong> spring resulted in similar corn yield<br />

to urea using the same methods over a<br />

4-year period.<br />

(R<strong>and</strong>all <strong>and</strong> Vetsch, 2009)


Kansas-<br />

At drier locations, ESN not beneficial<br />

to corn or grain sorghum.<br />

At wetter locations, some studies showed<br />

a benefit to its use.<br />

(Weber et al., 2009a <strong>and</strong> 2009b)


In Michigan in winter wheat,<br />

fall ESN at the 60 lb N/acre rate<br />

produced higher yield than urea.<br />

Not at the 90 lb N/acre rate.


50/50 blends of urea/ENS?<br />

KS studies (Weber <strong>and</strong> Mengel, 2009)<br />

compared to straight ESN or Urea.<br />

Results showed that in some years, the<br />

blend was superior, <strong>and</strong> in some years it<br />

was not.


SUMMARY-<br />

Nitrapyrin <strong>and</strong> DCD are proven nitrification<br />

inhibitors. Their use is limited due to the<br />

inability to predict when they would be<br />

economically beneficial. Growers tend<br />

to use these products to push<br />

their timing <strong>and</strong> spread work loads, rather<br />

than use them to improve overall N use<br />

efficiency


SUMMARY-<br />

Agrotain is a proven urease inhibitor.<br />

Its use is becoming increasingly more<br />

common in no-till systems that still<br />

rely on surface application of urea.


SUMMARY-<br />

Ammonium thiosulfate is a limited use<br />

nitrification <strong>and</strong> urease inhibitor due to<br />

the rate of mineralization of the fertilizer.<br />

It may be of some value if used at the correct<br />

rate, but other products appear to be<br />

more consistent in their activity.


SUMMARY-<br />

Nutrisphere has no nitrification or urease<br />

inhibition properties <strong>and</strong> should<br />

not be used <strong>for</strong> these purposes.<br />

Within the small number of yield increases,<br />

most are not related to N uptake by the crop.<br />

These yield increases are curious <strong>and</strong> should be<br />

investigated by the company to determine<br />

the reason <strong>for</strong> yield increases.


SUMMARY-<br />

<strong>Slow</strong>-release fertilizers produced by<br />

chemical bonding with urea have<br />

slow-release properties <strong>and</strong> have been used<br />

in the turf industries <strong>for</strong> years. Their release<br />

into field crops has met with mixed<br />

success. Rates comparable to those of<br />

traditional fertilizer products may be useful<br />

as slow release products, but their cost<br />

would be prohibitive. Use as a low-rate<br />

substitute <strong>for</strong> recommended N rates has<br />

not successfully improved crop yield or quality.


SUMMARY-<br />

Positive results have been shown with ESN<br />

in several states when weather conditions<br />

might result in loss of conventional urea<br />

products. Its cost makes it much more<br />

competitive as a slow-release product compared<br />

to the triazole-, methyl-urea based products.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!