Slow-Release Nitrogen Fertilizers and Nitrogen Additives for Field ...
Slow-Release Nitrogen Fertilizers and Nitrogen Additives for Field ...
Slow-Release Nitrogen Fertilizers and Nitrogen Additives for Field ...
Transform your PDFs into Flipbooks and boost your revenue!
Leverage SEO-optimized Flipbooks, powerful backlinks, and multimedia content to professionally showcase your products and significantly increase your reach.
<strong>Slow</strong>-<strong>Release</strong> <strong>Nitrogen</strong> <strong>Fertilizers</strong><br />
<strong>and</strong> <strong>Nitrogen</strong> <strong>Additives</strong><br />
<strong>for</strong> <strong>Field</strong> Crops<br />
Dave Franzen<br />
North Dakota State University
<strong>Nitrogen</strong> Management-<br />
The problem that has built<br />
many careers
Ammonia volatilization from urea<br />
Nitrification<br />
Denitrification
<strong>Nitrogen</strong> use efficiency-<br />
Worldwide about 33% NUE<br />
(Raun <strong>and</strong> Johnson, 1999)
Spring Wheat N timeline<br />
Application<br />
Period of greatest uptake<br />
Day 1 Day 30 Day 60 Day 90
Corn N timeline<br />
Application<br />
Period of greatest uptake<br />
Day 1 Day 45 Day 80 Day 120
-Nitrification inhibitors<br />
-Urease inhibitor additives<br />
-Nitrification <strong>and</strong> urease inhibitor<br />
-Urease inhibition through chemical binding<br />
with urea as applied with slow-release properties<br />
-Urease inhibition through physical separation<br />
of urea from soil
Nitrification inhibitors-<br />
N-Serve®<br />
nitrapyrin (2-chloro-6-[trichloromethyl] pyridine)<br />
DCD, dicy<strong>and</strong>iamide
Spring N,Touchton<br />
et al., 1978<br />
Fall N, Touchton et al., 1978
Some studies showed a yield increase with<br />
N-Serve, while others showed no yield<br />
increase. Yield increases were more a<br />
result of weather between application <strong>and</strong> N<br />
uptake rather than per<strong>for</strong>mance of the product.<br />
Yield increases over the seven years in Minnesota<br />
were 15 bushels per acre more <strong>for</strong> fall<br />
anhydrous ammonia + N-Serve over fall<br />
anhydrous ammonia alone, <strong>and</strong> 27 bushels per<br />
acre more <strong>for</strong> spring anhydrous ammonia<br />
compared to fall anhydrous ammonia<br />
(R<strong>and</strong>all et al., 2008).
Instinct ® is a new <strong>for</strong>mulation of<br />
Nitrapyrin that can be mixed with<br />
ammonium fertilizers <strong>and</strong> can stay on the<br />
soil surface without incorporation.<br />
Research so far at Minnesota, Illinois,<br />
Iowa <strong>and</strong> Nebraska have shown no yield<br />
benefit to the use of Instinct over N<br />
fertilizer alone, although the product<br />
inhibits nitrification<br />
(Kentucky, Schwab, unpublished data)
Wisconsin-<br />
Corn yield increase with Instinct in<br />
2008, but not 2009.
DCD<br />
No. of comparisons<br />
With<br />
Total significant<br />
advantage<br />
Average<br />
response<br />
%<br />
Timing<br />
Fall 4 1 +1.6<br />
Spring 15 3 +3.4<br />
Sidedress 3 1 +1.4<br />
N Source<br />
Ammonium sulfate 2 0 -1.0<br />
Anhydrous<br />
ammonia<br />
6 1 +3.6<br />
Urea 4 4 +2.2<br />
From Malzer et al., 1989
Yield increases with DCD<br />
were more consistently achieved<br />
in potato in the Malzer survey.
NBPT (N-(n-butyl) thiophosphoric acid triamide)<br />
Agrotain<br />
Competes <strong>for</strong> active sites on the urease<br />
enzyme <strong>and</strong> ties up activity <strong>for</strong> about 10 days,<br />
depending on weather conditions.
Effect of seed-placed urea with <strong>and</strong> without Agrotain,<br />
on st<strong>and</strong> density <strong>and</strong> grain yield of barley on a fine s<strong>and</strong>y loam<br />
soil, 1994-96. (From Grant, 2004).<br />
N rate, lb/acre St<strong>and</strong>, plants/foot Yield, bu/acre<br />
No<br />
Agrotain<br />
Agrotain<br />
No<br />
Agrotain<br />
Agrotain<br />
0 7.6 7.6 50 50<br />
18 7.9 8.2 55 52<br />
36 7.3 7.7 53 62<br />
54 6.0 7.1 59 57<br />
72 5.7 7.1 63 61<br />
89 4.7 7.1 57 65
Yield <strong>for</strong> side-dressed no-till corn in Hardin County, KY.<br />
(From Schwab <strong>and</strong> Murdock, 2009)<br />
Treatment<br />
Yield, bushels per acre<br />
Check (50 lb N/acre preplant<br />
N only) 117d*<br />
Urea<br />
158c<br />
Urea + Agrotain<br />
201b<br />
SuperU<br />
201b<br />
UAN<br />
150c<br />
UAN + Agrotain<br />
179bc<br />
UAN + Agrotain Plus<br />
175bc<br />
Ammonium nitrate<br />
239a
Indiana- Purdue, unpublished work by<br />
Phillips, Mengel <strong>and</strong> Walker, 1989.<br />
Corn Yield<br />
bu/acre<br />
Urea surface applied 130<br />
Urea surface applied +Agrotain 143
Illinois, average of four southern Illinois<br />
locations, Varsa et al., 1999.<br />
Corn Yield<br />
bu/acre<br />
Urea surface applied 106<br />
Urea surface applied +Agrotain 125
Nitrification <strong>and</strong> urease inhibitors<br />
Ammonium thiosulfate<br />
Nutrisphere ®
ATS has nitrification <strong>and</strong> urease inhibiting<br />
properties.<br />
It is not as effective generally as nitrapyrin, DCD,<br />
or NBPT.<br />
ATS is most effective as a nitrification inhibitor<br />
at concentrations of 25 ppm S (About 0.1% ATS).<br />
Under warm conditions (>60 o F), mineralization<br />
is complete in a week.<br />
Under cooler temperatures, mineralization is<br />
slower; about 3 weeks.
In a fall application of aqua ammonia with ATS<br />
compared with nitrapyrin, similar ammonia<br />
concentration was found in the spring<br />
with the two products (Goos <strong>and</strong> Johnson, 1999.)
ATS affects the both steps of<br />
nitrification- ammonium to nitrate<br />
<strong>and</strong> nitrite to nitrate.<br />
Higher than recommended concentrations<br />
of ATS can result in an accumulation of<br />
nitrite. Studies that used the<br />
recommended concentration of ATS<br />
did not see an accumulation of nitrite.
Nutrisphere,<br />
SFP Specialty Products, LLC, Leawood, KS<br />
Formulation <strong>for</strong> dry fertilizer-<br />
30-60% maleic-itoconic copolymer,<br />
pH 2.5-5<br />
Formulation <strong>for</strong> liquid fertilizer-<br />
40% maleic-itoconic copolymer, pH 1-2
Product literature states that nitrification<br />
inhibition is based on product ability<br />
to tie-up copper- a critical metal used<br />
by nitrification bacteria.<br />
Inhibition of urease activity is due<br />
theoretically to a tie-up of soil nickela<br />
critical metal constituent of urease<br />
enzyme.
Effects of N additive, averaged over source (UAN <strong>and</strong> urea) <strong>and</strong> N<br />
rate on corn grain yield, earleaf-N <strong>and</strong> grain-N, Sc<strong>and</strong>ia, KS<br />
(2-year average). From Gordon, 2008.<br />
Treatment Yield, bu/acre Earleaf N, % Grain N, %<br />
Check 152 1.72 1.13<br />
Urea/UAN 168 2.57 1.26<br />
ESN 185 2.96 1.33<br />
Nutrisphere-N 183 2.96 1.35<br />
Agrotain 183 2.98 1.36<br />
LSD 5% 6 0.09 0.04
(Research by R.J. Goos, in Franzen et al., J. Plant Nut 2010?)
(Research by R.J. Goos, in Franzen et al., J. Plant Nut 2010?)
Cumulative ammonia volatilization losses <strong>for</strong> urea, ammonium<br />
sulfate, urea + NBPT, <strong>and</strong> urea + 0.25% Nutrisphere (NSN)<br />
from a Dewitt silt loam soil during a 15-day laboratory incubation<br />
at 25°C. (Norman data, University Arkansas, Fayetteville,<br />
from Franzen et al., 2010?)<br />
N sources<br />
Days after N source application<br />
3 7 11 15<br />
Cumulative NH 3 loss, % of N applied<br />
Urea 14.5 35.9 51.8 56.9<br />
Ammonium sulfate 0.1 0.2 0.5 0.6<br />
Urea + NBPT † 0.006 2.7 12.9 18.3<br />
Urea + 0.25% NSN 17.6 42.2 57.8 62.7<br />
LSD(0.05) ‡<br />
LSD(0.05) § 12.2<br />
9.6
Laboratory studies clearly show that<br />
Nutrisphere has no nitrification or urease<br />
inhibiting properties. What is most curious<br />
is why some studies show some response.<br />
No Response Positive<br />
North Dakota 8 0<br />
Kansas 7 5 (4 at Sc<strong>and</strong>ia)<br />
Minnesota 2 0<br />
Illinois 3 1<br />
Arkansas/Mississippi 3 0<br />
Montana work on barley showed a yield increase,<br />
but no increase in N uptake.
One possible reason <strong>for</strong> the yield increase<br />
is the pH of the product, particularly with<br />
the liquid <strong>for</strong>mulation. Acid pH lowers the<br />
rate of nitrification. Perhaps it is not<br />
the Nutrisphere that is active. Perhaps it is<br />
its acidity?
Urease inhibitors through chemical binding with<br />
urea <strong>and</strong> slow-release properties<br />
Nitramin- Triazole-methyl urea<br />
CoRon (19.6% methyl-urea, methyl-diurea,<br />
urea (8.6%)<br />
N-Pact (9.6%) Methyl-triazole, urea (17.4%)
Effect of Georgia-Pacific 43-0-0 Nitramin amended urea compared to<br />
urea surface applied in no-till spring wheat, 2008 near Valley City,<br />
ND. Franzen, unpublished data.<br />
Treatment<br />
Lb Yield, Protein, %<br />
N/acre bu/acre<br />
Check 0 38 12.1<br />
Urea 30 46 12.4<br />
60 51 13.3<br />
90 57 14.1<br />
120 63 15.1<br />
Urea +Nitramin 43-0-0 30 45 12.7<br />
60 57 13.3<br />
90 60 14.4<br />
120 58 15.0<br />
LSD 5% 6 0.7
South Dakota work on Nitramin blends<br />
found no increase in corn yields in 2007,<br />
or spring wheat yield in 2008, but grain<br />
protein was increased in 2008, suggesting<br />
some slow-release properties by the<br />
fertilizer.<br />
(Bly <strong>and</strong> Gelderman, 2008;2009)
Application of 2 gallon per acre 30-0-0 Nitramin at several barley<br />
growth stages near Valley City, ND, 2008. Franzen, 2009.<br />
Treatment<br />
Yield,<br />
bu/acre<br />
Protein,<br />
%<br />
Check 117 13.4<br />
2-leaf 125 12.8<br />
Early jointing 116 13.3<br />
Boot 109 13.3<br />
Anthesis 119 13.2<br />
LSD % 6 NS
Similar applications of Nitramin to<br />
spring wheat had no positive effect<br />
on wheat yield or protein..<br />
Applications of N-Pact at the 4-5 leaf<br />
stage or post-anthesis had no effect<br />
on grain yield or protein at rates of<br />
2-3 gal/acre
Valley City, 2008, 0-2-3 gal/a N-Pact 5-6 leaf<br />
yield with preplant N rate- urea
Valley City, N-Pact 5-6 leaf, flag-leaf N after<br />
preplant urea, 2008.
Valley City protein response to 5-leaf N-Pact<br />
application over preplant urea rates, 2008.
Yield response from post-anthesis application<br />
N-Pact, 3 gal/acre over preplant urea. Valley<br />
City, 2008.
Protein response of post-anthesis N-Pact<br />
application, 3 gal/acre. Valley City, 2008<br />
Only point of increase
Effect of foliar treatment of spring wheat near<br />
Valley City, on yield, test weight <strong>and</strong> protein, 2008<br />
Treatment Yield Test weight Protein<br />
Check 68.3 58.2 12.5<br />
3.5 leaf 1 gal/a 65.7 58.0 11.9<br />
3.5 leaf 3 gal/a 66.3 57.9 12.5<br />
Early joint 1 gal/a 60.2 57.7 13.0<br />
Early joint 3 gal/a 57.5 57.0 11.2<br />
Early boot 1 gal/a 67.3 58.2 13.4<br />
Early boot 3 gal/a 62.2 57.3 11.8<br />
Flowering 1 gal/a 59.0 57.4 11.9<br />
Flowering 3 gal/a 65.5 57.5 12.5<br />
LSD 5% NS NS NS
2009 Carrington, ave. 2 sites, post-anthesis<br />
application <strong>for</strong> protein enhancement. Schatz<br />
15<br />
14.5<br />
14<br />
13.5<br />
Irr Faller<br />
Lebsock<br />
average<br />
13<br />
untreated<br />
check<br />
10 gal UAN 12 gal Coron 2 gal Coron<br />
Faller yields over 100 bu/acre<br />
Slide courtesy of Greg<br />
Endres, NDSU, Carrington REC
Urease inhibition through physical<br />
separation of urea from soil<br />
These are fertilizers with physical<br />
coatings. The most common fertilizer<br />
of this type being marketed across the<br />
region is ESN by Agrium
Illinois-<br />
4 locations over 12 years, ESN was similar<br />
in corn yield to urea + Agrotain, <strong>and</strong> 3 bu/a<br />
higher in yield than urea alone.<br />
In 4 years of no-till, ESN was 21 bu/a better<br />
than urea surface-applied.<br />
(Ebelhar et al., 2010)
Minnesota-<br />
3 different ESN application methodsdeep<br />
b<strong>and</strong> (4 inches), broadcast incorporated<br />
fall <strong>and</strong> spring resulted in similar corn yield<br />
to urea using the same methods over a<br />
4-year period.<br />
(R<strong>and</strong>all <strong>and</strong> Vetsch, 2009)
Kansas-<br />
At drier locations, ESN not beneficial<br />
to corn or grain sorghum.<br />
At wetter locations, some studies showed<br />
a benefit to its use.<br />
(Weber et al., 2009a <strong>and</strong> 2009b)
In Michigan in winter wheat,<br />
fall ESN at the 60 lb N/acre rate<br />
produced higher yield than urea.<br />
Not at the 90 lb N/acre rate.
50/50 blends of urea/ENS?<br />
KS studies (Weber <strong>and</strong> Mengel, 2009)<br />
compared to straight ESN or Urea.<br />
Results showed that in some years, the<br />
blend was superior, <strong>and</strong> in some years it<br />
was not.
SUMMARY-<br />
Nitrapyrin <strong>and</strong> DCD are proven nitrification<br />
inhibitors. Their use is limited due to the<br />
inability to predict when they would be<br />
economically beneficial. Growers tend<br />
to use these products to push<br />
their timing <strong>and</strong> spread work loads, rather<br />
than use them to improve overall N use<br />
efficiency
SUMMARY-<br />
Agrotain is a proven urease inhibitor.<br />
Its use is becoming increasingly more<br />
common in no-till systems that still<br />
rely on surface application of urea.
SUMMARY-<br />
Ammonium thiosulfate is a limited use<br />
nitrification <strong>and</strong> urease inhibitor due to<br />
the rate of mineralization of the fertilizer.<br />
It may be of some value if used at the correct<br />
rate, but other products appear to be<br />
more consistent in their activity.
SUMMARY-<br />
Nutrisphere has no nitrification or urease<br />
inhibition properties <strong>and</strong> should<br />
not be used <strong>for</strong> these purposes.<br />
Within the small number of yield increases,<br />
most are not related to N uptake by the crop.<br />
These yield increases are curious <strong>and</strong> should be<br />
investigated by the company to determine<br />
the reason <strong>for</strong> yield increases.
SUMMARY-<br />
<strong>Slow</strong>-release fertilizers produced by<br />
chemical bonding with urea have<br />
slow-release properties <strong>and</strong> have been used<br />
in the turf industries <strong>for</strong> years. Their release<br />
into field crops has met with mixed<br />
success. Rates comparable to those of<br />
traditional fertilizer products may be useful<br />
as slow release products, but their cost<br />
would be prohibitive. Use as a low-rate<br />
substitute <strong>for</strong> recommended N rates has<br />
not successfully improved crop yield or quality.
SUMMARY-<br />
Positive results have been shown with ESN<br />
in several states when weather conditions<br />
might result in loss of conventional urea<br />
products. Its cost makes it much more<br />
competitive as a slow-release product compared<br />
to the triazole-, methyl-urea based products.