- Page 1: A 5/2006 Deformation behaviour of r
- Page 5 and 6: 3 Brecciaroli, Fabrizio - Kolisoja,
- Page 7 and 8: 5 In modelling the long-term behavi
- Page 9 and 10: 7 oteta huomioon. Toisaalta partikk
- Page 11 and 12: 9 FOREWORD This is a literature sur
- Page 13 and 14: 11 5.2.3 Resilient modulus as a fun
- Page 15 and 16: 13 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Background Du
- Page 17 and 18: 15 can be studied for a great numbe
- Page 19 and 20: 17 2 INTRODUCTION TO THE MECHANICAL
- Page 21 and 22: 19 compressive stress. Since the pr
- Page 23 and 24: 21 stresses but independent of the
- Page 25 and 26: 23 stress. Evaluation of a particul
- Page 27 and 28: 25 Figure 2.2:3 Dependence between
- Page 29 and 30: 27 If the directions of the princip
- Page 31 and 32: 29 3 BASIC APPROACHES IN MODELLING
- Page 33 and 34: 31 Figure 3.2.2:1 Linear elastic de
- Page 35 and 36: 33 1 −ν −ν 0 0 0 −ν 1 −
- Page 37 and 38: 35 If the structure to be analysed
- Page 39 and 40: 37 Figure 3.3:1 An example of a mec
- Page 41 and 42: 39 4 FACTORS AFFECTING RESILIENT DE
- Page 43 and 44: 41 Resilient Poisson's ratio is als
- Page 45 and 46: 43 Hoff (1999) measured the resilie
- Page 47 and 48: 45 Figure 4.4:1 A typical variation
- Page 49 and 50: 47 drawn for the moduli of low-leve
- Page 51 and 52: 49 Figure 4.5:2 Modulus of resilien
- Page 53 and 54:
51 Figure 4.6.2:1 Grain size distri
- Page 55 and 56:
53 Resilient modulus (MPa) 1200 100
- Page 57 and 58:
55 absorbing water, the layers of a
- Page 59 and 60:
57 Figure 4.6.4:2 Elastic shear str
- Page 61 and 62:
59 Mitry (1964), Seed et al. (1967)
- Page 63 and 64:
61 Figure 4.7:2 Variation in the sh
- Page 65 and 66:
63 Resilient modulus (MPa) 1200 100
- Page 67 and 68:
65 Bergen in Norway (LA = 17.1) and
- Page 69 and 70:
67 dimensional proportions of the a
- Page 71 and 72:
69 Resilient modulus (MPa) 800 700
- Page 73 and 74:
71 Figure 4.8:5 Functional overview
- Page 75 and 76:
73 There are two test methodologies
- Page 77 and 78:
75 Sometimes in the literature (e.g
- Page 79 and 80:
77 2 τ = ( σ 1 −σ 3 ) . (Eq. 5
- Page 81 and 82:
79 q = deviator stress, σ 3 = mino
- Page 83 and 84:
81 The models mentioned above are b
- Page 85 and 86:
83 the resilient Poisson's ratio. T
- Page 87 and 88:
85 the model parameters, the repeat
- Page 89 and 90:
87 Poisson's ratio would be replace
- Page 91 and 92:
89 final stress state. Based on the
- Page 93 and 94:
91 Even though the contour model, t
- Page 95 and 96:
93 Hornych et al. (1998) was shown
- Page 97 and 98:
95 may conflict with the desire to
- Page 99 and 100:
97 using the ultimate shear strengt
- Page 101 and 102:
99 Table 6.2:1 Stress sensitivity o
- Page 103 and 104:
101 Figure 6.3:2 Load series for pe
- Page 105 and 106:
103 permanent strain with number of
- Page 107 and 108:
105 Figure 6.4:2 An example of the
- Page 109 and 110:
107 Figure 6.5:1Variation of perman
- Page 111 and 112:
109 Figure 6.5:3 The development of
- Page 113 and 114:
111 Figure 6.6:1 Pore pressure buil
- Page 115 and 116:
113 Figure 6.6:2 Influence of drain
- Page 117 and 118:
115 Figure 6.6:5 Elastic and plasti
- Page 119 and 120:
117 Figure 6.6:8 Permanent strain r
- Page 121 and 122:
119 Figure 6.7:2 Effect of density
- Page 123 and 124:
121 Figure 6.7:5 Effect of grading
- Page 125 and 126:
123 sin(φ) and sin(ρ) 0,6 0,5 0,4
- Page 127 and 128:
125 to markedly affect the permanen
- Page 129 and 130:
127 concentrated at the contact poi
- Page 131 and 132:
129 separated by a certain stress l
- Page 133 and 134:
131 Other two models falling into t
- Page 135 and 136:
133 b ε 1, p = a ⋅ N , (Eq. 7.5:
- Page 137 and 138:
135 ε * 1,p(N) = additional perman
- Page 139 and 140:
137 An example of prediction of res
- Page 141 and 142:
139 Figure 7.6:1 Comparison between
- Page 143 and 144:
141 q max * ( p + p ) max A = , (Eq
- Page 145 and 146:
143 Figure 7.7:2 Permanent deformat
- Page 147 and 148:
145 content, which is the factor wi
- Page 149 and 150:
147 In his model, Theyse (2000) att
- Page 151 and 152:
149 is observed. For this reason, a
- Page 153 and 154:
151 8 REPEATED LOAD TRIAXIAL APPARA
- Page 155 and 156:
153 conditions, since in an embankm
- Page 157 and 158:
155 for projects on the behaviour o
- Page 159 and 160:
157 put in place, before the triaxi
- Page 161 and 162:
159 Figure 8.6.3:2 Phases of a load
- Page 163 and 164:
161 − Instrumentation → The tes
- Page 165 and 166:
163 Axial loading system The axial
- Page 167 and 168:
165 The confining stress is limited
- Page 169 and 170:
167 The lateral strain is measured
- Page 171 and 172:
169 examined for leaks through pinh
- Page 173 and 174:
171 Figure 8.8.2:1 The triaxial cel
- Page 175 and 176:
173 Figure 8.8.3:1 Cyclic loads app
- Page 177 and 178:
175 The materials used by Coronado
- Page 179 and 180:
177 At the end of the cyclic triaxi
- Page 181 and 182:
179 Figure 8.10:4 Results of large
- Page 183 and 184:
181 9.2 Permanent deformation behav
- Page 185 and 186:
183 REFERENCES Allaart, A.P. (1992)
- Page 187 and 188:
185 Brown, S.F (1974). Repeated Loa
- Page 189 and 190:
187 Dawson, A.R. and Wellner, F. (1
- Page 191 and 192:
189 Gray, J.E. (1962). Characterist
- Page 193 and 194:
191 Jouve, P., Martinez, J. Paute,
- Page 195 and 196:
193 Lentz, R.W. and Baladi, G.Y. (1
- Page 197 and 198:
195 Pappin, J.W., (1979). Character
- Page 199 and 200:
197 Sharp, R.W. (1983). Shakedown a
- Page 201 and 202:
199 Trollope, D.H., Lee, J.K. and M
- Page 203 and 204:
201 Yu, H.S. and Hossain, M.Z. (199
- Page 205 and 206:
Liite RHK:n julkaisuun A 5/2006 2 1
- Page 207 and 208:
Liite RHK:n julkaisuun A 5/2006 kuo
- Page 209 and 210:
Liite RHK:n julkaisuun A 5/2006 Vuo
- Page 211 and 212:
Liite RHK:n julkaisuun A 5/2006 8 4
- Page 213 and 214:
10 Liite RHK:n julkaisuun A 5/2006
- Page 215:
ISBN 952-445-147-6 ISBN 952-445-148