01.11.2014 Views

The Impact of Micron Technology Virginia on the Economies of the ...

The Impact of Micron Technology Virginia on the Economies of the ...

The Impact of Micron Technology Virginia on the Economies of the ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>the</strong>se equaled $797.77. This expenditure demand included <strong>the</strong> actual usage as well as <strong>the</strong> availability or general benefit received<br />

by employees (and <strong>the</strong>ir employers) from being located within <strong>the</strong> City <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Manassas (e.g., <strong>the</strong>oretically, expenditures<br />

for General Government equally benefit all residents and employees working within <strong>the</strong> City). Expenditures also include<br />

debt service; this was allocated between residential and n<strong>on</strong>-residential beneficiaries in proporti<strong>on</strong> to <strong>the</strong> purpose <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong><br />

public debt (e.g., capital borrowing for school c<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong> was charged <strong>on</strong>ly to residential uses).<br />

Applying this model and its per-employee revenue and expenditure multipliers produced total values needed to calculate <strong>the</strong><br />

fiscal impact <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Micr<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> City <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Manassas in FY 2005. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> results <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> this calculati<strong>on</strong> are presented in Table 6. With<br />

total estimated revenues <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> $5.6 milli<strong>on</strong>—<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> which 90 percent are in <strong>the</strong> form <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> direct payments for real estate and pers<strong>on</strong>al<br />

property, and with <strong>the</strong> dollar value <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> demands <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> City’s services totaling an estimated at $808,141—<strong>the</strong> significance<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Micr<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g>’s fiscal c<strong>on</strong>tributi<strong>on</strong> to <strong>the</strong> City is clear. Revenues exceed expenditure demand by a factor <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 7; that is, for every<br />

$1 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> expenditure demand, <str<strong>on</strong>g>Micr<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>tributed $6.90 in revenues to <strong>the</strong> City’s treasury for a net benefit totaling $4.85 milli<strong>on</strong>.<br />

Table 6: <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> Fiscal <str<strong>on</strong>g>Impact</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Micr<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> City <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Manassas<br />

Sources<br />

Values<br />

Revenues<br />

Real Estate and O<strong>the</strong>r Property Taxes $5,010,000<br />

N<strong>on</strong>-Property Tax Revenues* $647,398<br />

Total Revenues $5,567,400<br />

Total Expenditures** $808,141<br />

Net fiscal <str<strong>on</strong>g>Impact</str<strong>on</strong>g> (Revenues/Expenditures) $4,849,259<br />

Net Fiscal Benefit Per <str<strong>on</strong>g>Micr<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> Employee $4,787<br />

Sources: City <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Manassas Comprehensive Annual Financial Report and GMU Center for Regi<strong>on</strong>al Analysis. *based <strong>on</strong> per employee n<strong>on</strong>-property tax revenue multiplier for 2005. **based <strong>on</strong> per<br />

employee expenditure-demand multiplier for 2005.<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> magnitude <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> this net fiscal benefit can be calibrated by expressing it in terms <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Micr<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g>’s employment base. For each<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Micr<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g>’s 1,013 Manassas workers, <str<strong>on</strong>g>Micr<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g>’s net fiscal c<strong>on</strong>tributi<strong>on</strong> to <strong>the</strong> City equals $4,787. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> significance <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> this<br />

net fiscal c<strong>on</strong>tributi<strong>on</strong> can be seen by calculating <strong>the</strong> budget impact <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> its absence; that is, if it had not existed. Without <strong>the</strong><br />

revenue surplus generated by <str<strong>on</strong>g>Micr<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> in FY 2005, <strong>the</strong> City’s budget would have had a deficit <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> $3.665 milli<strong>on</strong> ra<strong>the</strong>r than<br />

registering a surplus <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> $1.184. In effect, this surplus allowed <strong>the</strong> City to lower its real estate tax rate in 2005 and to provide<br />

public services to its residents that o<strong>the</strong>rwise would have required a higher tax burden. In <strong>the</strong> absence <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> this fiscal surplus,<br />

<strong>the</strong> real estate tax rate could have <strong>on</strong>ly been reduced from it 2004 rate <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> $1.15 per $100 assessed valuati<strong>on</strong> to $1.086 per<br />

$100 ra<strong>the</strong>r than <strong>the</strong> $1.00 rate actually adopted in 2005 with no year-end surplus. This fiscal benefit has important implicati<strong>on</strong>s<br />

to <strong>the</strong> City’s budget and to <strong>the</strong> added value its residents receive for <strong>the</strong> taxes <strong>the</strong>y pay.<br />

Summary <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Impact</str<strong>on</strong>g>s<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> ec<strong>on</strong>omic impacts generated by capital and operating expenditures by <str<strong>on</strong>g>Micr<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> in <strong>the</strong> City <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Manassas, Prince William<br />

County, Nor<strong>the</strong>rn <str<strong>on</strong>g>Virginia</str<strong>on</strong>g>, and <strong>the</strong> Comm<strong>on</strong>wealth <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Virginia</str<strong>on</strong>g> can be measured in terms <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> direct and total job creati<strong>on</strong>,<br />

added pers<strong>on</strong>al earnings that will accrue to local and state residents, and <strong>the</strong> additi<strong>on</strong>al jobs supported by this spending<br />

bey<strong>on</strong>d <strong>the</strong> direct workforce employed <str<strong>on</strong>g>Micr<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g>. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g>se impacts are generated both by capital outlays that extend for <strong>the</strong><br />

durati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> plants and equipment modernizati<strong>on</strong> and occur <strong>on</strong> an annual basis from direct payroll and operating outlays by<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Micr<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> for <strong>the</strong> daily operati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> its Manassas plant.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!