State-of-the-Art Report on Full-Depth Precast Concrete Bridge Deck
State-of-the-Art Report on Full-Depth Precast Concrete Bridge Deck
State-of-the-Art Report on Full-Depth Precast Concrete Bridge Deck
Transform your PDFs into Flipbooks and boost your revenue!
Leverage SEO-optimized Flipbooks, powerful backlinks, and multimedia content to professionally showcase your products and significantly increase your reach.
<str<strong>on</strong>g>State</str<strong>on</strong>g>-<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>-<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>-art <str<strong>on</strong>g>Report</str<strong>on</strong>g> On<br />
FULL-DEPTH PRECAST CONCRETE<br />
BRIDGE DECK PANELS<br />
(SOA -01-1911)
Vince Campbell<br />
Former president <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
Bayshore C<strong>on</strong>crete Products<br />
Corporati<strong>on</strong>, VA
This presentati<strong>on</strong> is developed by<br />
Sameh S. Badie, Ph.D., PE<br />
Associate Pr<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>essor<br />
George Washingt<strong>on</strong> University<br />
Washingt<strong>on</strong> DC, USA<br />
Maher K. Tadros, Ph.D., PE<br />
Pr<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>essor Emeritus, University <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Nebraska-Lincoln<br />
Founder, e.c<strong>on</strong>struct., USA, Omaha, Nebraska<br />
for<br />
Note:<br />
this presentati<strong>on</strong> is a<br />
shortened versi<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> a 2-<br />
hour training PCI class <strong>on</strong><br />
<strong>Full</strong> <strong>Depth</strong> <strong>Precast</strong> <strong>Deck</strong>s<br />
(Dec. 2011)
Table <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> C<strong>on</strong>tents<br />
A. Introducti<strong>on</strong>, C<strong>on</strong>cept & Advantages<br />
B. Comp<strong>on</strong>ent <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> FDDP*<br />
C. Details <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> FDDP*<br />
D. Miscellaneous issues<br />
E. Examples <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> successful projects<br />
F. Available resources<br />
(* FDDP = <strong>Full</strong>-<strong>Depth</strong> <strong>Precast</strong> C<strong>on</strong>crete <strong>Deck</strong> Panels)
Directi<strong>on</strong>/Reinforcement<br />
Transverse<br />
10
Table <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> C<strong>on</strong>tents<br />
A. Introducti<strong>on</strong>, C<strong>on</strong>cept & Advantages<br />
B. Comp<strong>on</strong>ent <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> FDDP*<br />
C. Details <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> FDDP*<br />
D. Miscellaneous issues<br />
E. Examples <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> successful projects<br />
F. Available resources<br />
(* FDDP = <strong>Full</strong>-<strong>Depth</strong> <strong>Precast</strong> C<strong>on</strong>crete <strong>Deck</strong> Panels)
A. Introducti<strong>on</strong>, C<strong>on</strong>cept & Advantages<br />
• In 2001 FHWA launched a new initiative called<br />
Accelerated <strong>Bridge</strong> C<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong><br />
• The ABC objectives (motto) were:<br />
Get in Get out Stay out<br />
High c<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong> speed<br />
Low maintenance<br />
• FHWA Recommendati<strong>on</strong>: Encourage using<br />
prefabricated bridge elements, such as<br />
foundati<strong>on</strong>s, columns, girders and deck panels
<strong>Full</strong>-<strong>Depth</strong> <strong>Precast</strong> <strong>Deck</strong> Panels (FDDP)
<strong>Full</strong> <strong>Depth</strong> <strong>Precast</strong> Panels Do not Crack<br />
• Cracking <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> FDDP is substantially c<strong>on</strong>trolled<br />
Because :<br />
– C<strong>on</strong>crete is mature. It has already underg<strong>on</strong>e<br />
most <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> its cement hydrati<strong>on</strong> temperature<br />
change, shrinkage and creep<br />
– The panels can be prestressed in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> plant and<br />
post-tensi<strong>on</strong>ed at <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> site, creating two-way<br />
precompressi<strong>on</strong>.
Fresh c<strong>on</strong>crete<br />
Girder<br />
Fresh c<strong>on</strong>crete shrinks because:<br />
1. Temperature drops after <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>crete sets (by as much as 80 degrees)<br />
ε Temp. drop = α * ∆T = (6x10 -6 )(80) = 4.8x10 -4<br />
2. Loss <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> hydrati<strong>on</strong> water (by as much as 300 micro strains)<br />
ε shrinkage = 3.0x10 -4<br />
Thus, total shrinkage strain, ε total = 4.8x10 -4 + 3.0x10 -4 = 7.8x10 -4<br />
If c<strong>on</strong>crete compressive strength, f’c = 1,000 psi at <strong>on</strong>e day<br />
Modulus <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> elasticity, E c = 57,000 (Sqrt 1,000) = 1,800 psi<br />
Tensile stress due to combined acti<strong>on</strong>s = ε total * E c = 1,400 psi<br />
Modulus <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> rapture = 7.5* Sqrt(f’c) = 237 psi<br />
Since <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> deck c<strong>on</strong>crete is restrained by steel girders, it cracks<br />
Fresh c<strong>on</strong>crete<br />
Girder
FDDP<br />
Advantages<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
FDDP<br />
C<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong> Speed<br />
Shrinkage cracking<br />
Hydrati<strong>on</strong> temperature<br />
cracking<br />
Formwork<br />
Maintenance cost<br />
Structural integrity<br />
Adaptability for c<strong>on</strong>tinuous<br />
span bridges<br />
Initial cost<br />
Service life<br />
High<br />
Eliminated<br />
Eliminated<br />
Eliminated<br />
Low<br />
Maintained<br />
Yes<br />
Relatively High<br />
L<strong>on</strong>g
Table <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> C<strong>on</strong>tents<br />
A. Introducti<strong>on</strong>, C<strong>on</strong>cept & Advantages<br />
B. Comp<strong>on</strong>ent <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> FDDP*<br />
C. Details <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> FDDP*<br />
D. Miscellaneous issues<br />
E. Examples <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> successful projects<br />
F. Available resources<br />
(* FDDP = <strong>Full</strong>-<strong>Depth</strong> <strong>Precast</strong> C<strong>on</strong>crete <strong>Deck</strong> Panels)
Comp<strong>on</strong>ents <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> FDDP<br />
Shear<br />
pockets<br />
<strong>Precast</strong><br />
panels<br />
Shear<br />
key<br />
Overlay<br />
(may be<br />
omitted)<br />
Pockets for<br />
splicing<br />
l<strong>on</strong>gitudinal<br />
reinforcement<br />
Leveling<br />
bolts<br />
Transverse<br />
joints<br />
L<strong>on</strong>gitudinal joint
Table <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> C<strong>on</strong>tents<br />
A. Introducti<strong>on</strong>, C<strong>on</strong>cept & Advantages<br />
B. Comp<strong>on</strong>ent <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> FDDP*<br />
C. Details <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> FDDP*<br />
D. Miscellaneous issues<br />
E. Examples <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> successful projects<br />
F. Available resources<br />
(* FDDP = <strong>Full</strong>-<strong>Depth</strong> <strong>Precast</strong> C<strong>on</strong>crete <strong>Deck</strong> Panels)
Panel-to-Girder C<strong>on</strong>necti<strong>on</strong><br />
A positive c<strong>on</strong>necti<strong>on</strong> between <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> precast<br />
panels and <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> supporting girders is<br />
required to create a composite deck-girder<br />
system
C<strong>on</strong>crete Girders
C<strong>on</strong>crete Girders
C<strong>on</strong>crete Girders<br />
NEW CONSTRUCTION WITH COIL INSERTS AND COIL BOLTS
C<strong>on</strong>crete Girders<br />
NEW CONSTRUCTION WITH PROJECTING DOUBLE HEADED STUD
Live Oak <strong>Bridge</strong>, TX
C<strong>on</strong>crete Girders
I-39/90 <strong>Bridge</strong> over Door Creek, MacFarland, Wis<br />
Steel Girders
Types <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Shear Pockets<br />
FDDP with<br />
individual<br />
Open<br />
shear<br />
pockets<br />
I-39/90 <strong>Bridge</strong> over Door Creek, MacFarland, Wis
FDDPs with c<strong>on</strong>tinuously<br />
open channels for PT and<br />
composite c<strong>on</strong>necti<strong>on</strong><br />
NCHRP 12-41<br />
NUDECK System<br />
Skyline <strong>Bridge</strong>, Omaha, Nebraska
FDDPs with<br />
individual<br />
hidden shear<br />
pockets<br />
NCHRP 12-65<br />
Live Oak <strong>Bridge</strong>, TX
Spacing Between Shear Pockets<br />
S = 2 ft<br />
ASSHTO LRFD<br />
S = 4 ft<br />
NCHRP 12-65<br />
Wis. DOT<br />
S<br />
I-39/90 <strong>Bridge</strong> over Door Creek, MacFarland, Wis
Panel-to-Panel Transverse<br />
C<strong>on</strong>necti<strong>on</strong>
Male-Female (T<strong>on</strong>gue/Groove) Shear Key<br />
Bloomingt<strong>on</strong> <strong>Bridge</strong>, Indiana <str<strong>on</strong>g>State</str<strong>on</strong>g> Highway Commissi<strong>on</strong><br />
Cracking, spalling & leakage were observed.<br />
Due to elevati<strong>on</strong> adjusts and fabricati<strong>on</strong> tolerances , <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> t<strong>on</strong>gue/groove detail<br />
did not provide 100% match.
Female-to-Female Shear Key<br />
Bulb Shape (NCHRP 12-41)
Female-to-Female Shear Key<br />
Diam<strong>on</strong>d Shape (NCHRP 12-41)<br />
More flexible detail with higher level <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> mechanical interlocking capacity
Leveling<br />
Bolts<br />
Live Oak <strong>Bridge</strong>, TX
Splicing L<strong>on</strong>gitudinal Reinforcement<br />
Case 1: Reinforcing Bars, No PT<br />
Overlapping<br />
U-bars<br />
Notes<br />
- Extending bars<br />
outside <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> panels<br />
- Bending diameter vs<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> panel thickness<br />
- Use U-shape bars<br />
separate from panel<br />
reinforcement<br />
Bill Emers<strong>on</strong> Memorial <strong>Bridge</strong>, Missouri DOT
2'-3"<br />
#7 splice bar, 2'-2 1/2" l<strong>on</strong>g<br />
2" 6" + 1/4" **<br />
3 3/4"<br />
4 1/8"<br />
4" OD, 1" pitch, 27" l<strong>on</strong>g,<br />
1/4" diameter wire<br />
Using HS Spirals<br />
NCHRP 12-41
Using Open Steel Tubes<br />
NCHRP 12-65
Live Oak<br />
<strong>Bridge</strong>, TX<br />
Notes<br />
- Alignment <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> slots<br />
- Tight fabricati<strong>on</strong> tolerance<br />
- Durability was enhanced by minimizing<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> exposed surface area <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> grout<br />
(using hidden shear pockets and <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
open steel tube detail for splicing <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
l<strong>on</strong>gitudinal reinforcement)
Using Closed<br />
Steel Tubes<br />
(NCHRP 12-65)<br />
Notes<br />
- Tilting panels during<br />
installati<strong>on</strong>
Splicing L<strong>on</strong>gitudinal Reinforcement<br />
Case 2: L<strong>on</strong>gitudinal Post Tensi<strong>on</strong>ing<br />
l<strong>on</strong>gitudinal PT is<br />
distributed over <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> width<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> panel
I-39/90 <strong>Bridge</strong><br />
over Door Creek,<br />
McFarland, Wis.<br />
Notes<br />
- Pocket is wide<br />
enough to allow for<br />
splicing <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> ducts
NUDECK<br />
NCHRP 12-41<br />
Skyline <strong>Bridge</strong><br />
Omaha,<br />
Nebraska<br />
l<strong>on</strong>gitudinal<br />
PT is<br />
c<strong>on</strong>centrated<br />
at girder lines<br />
Note:<br />
C<strong>on</strong>tinuously<br />
open channel,<br />
<strong>on</strong>e line <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
studs, visible<br />
strand for<br />
l<strong>on</strong>gitudinal PT
Transverse joints must be<br />
grouted before <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
l<strong>on</strong>gitudinal PT tend<strong>on</strong>s<br />
are tensi<strong>on</strong>ed<br />
I-39/90 <strong>Bridge</strong> over Door Creek, MacFarland, Wis
Special end panel<br />
is required for<br />
anchorage <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
PT strands<br />
Skyline <strong>Bridge</strong>, Omaha, Nebraska<br />
‣ PT d<strong>on</strong>e with a small jack,<br />
borrowed from UNL Lab<br />
‣ C<strong>on</strong>tractor worker was<br />
trained by UNL technician<br />
‣ Anchorage plate was locally<br />
fabricated
I-39/90 <strong>Bridge</strong> over Door Creek, MacFarland, Wis<br />
L<strong>on</strong>gitudinal PT ducts are grouted
I-39/90 <strong>Bridge</strong> over Door Creek, MacFarland, Wis<br />
Grout shear pockets and haunches
Panel-to-Panel L<strong>on</strong>gitudinal C<strong>on</strong>necti<strong>on</strong><br />
It is recommended to create <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>necti<strong>on</strong> in a positive moment area
Panel to Panel L<strong>on</strong>gitudinal C<strong>on</strong>necti<strong>on</strong>
Panel to Barrier C<strong>on</strong>necti<strong>on</strong>
Panel-to-Barrier C<strong>on</strong>necti<strong>on</strong>
Table <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> C<strong>on</strong>tents<br />
A. Introducti<strong>on</strong>, C<strong>on</strong>cept & Advantages<br />
B. Comp<strong>on</strong>ent <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> FDDP*<br />
C. Details <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> FDDP*<br />
D. Miscellaneous issues<br />
E. Examples <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> successful projects<br />
F. Design Example<br />
G. Available resources<br />
(* FDDP = <strong>Full</strong>-<strong>Depth</strong> <strong>Precast</strong> C<strong>on</strong>crete <strong>Deck</strong> Panels)
How to<br />
Handle Skew
Building Grout<br />
Barriers for<br />
Transverse<br />
C<strong>on</strong>necti<strong>on</strong>s
Grout Barriers for Haunches<br />
(between <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>Deck</strong> and <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Girders)<br />
Using wood forms
Skyline <strong>Bridge</strong>, Omaha, Nebraska<br />
Grout Barriers<br />
for Haunches<br />
Using steel<br />
angles
Grout Barriers<br />
for Haunches<br />
Using compressible<br />
material<br />
Live Oak <strong>Bridge</strong>, TX
Overlay Opti<strong>on</strong>s
Overlay Opti<strong>on</strong>s<br />
• The least expensive opti<strong>on</strong> is Opti<strong>on</strong> “f”.<br />
Provide an extra “wearing surface” thickness.<br />
Use standard roadway pr<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>iling grinders to<br />
smooth out <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> surface<br />
• Provide extra protecti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> reinforcement.<br />
• Discolorati<strong>on</strong> due at grouted joints and pockets<br />
may be objecti<strong>on</strong>able by some owners.
Table <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> C<strong>on</strong>tents<br />
A. Introducti<strong>on</strong>, C<strong>on</strong>cept & Advantages<br />
B. Comp<strong>on</strong>ent <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> FDDP*<br />
C. Details <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> FDDP*<br />
D. Miscellaneous issues<br />
E. Examples <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> successful projects<br />
F. Design Example<br />
G. Available resources<br />
(* FDDP = <strong>Full</strong>-<strong>Depth</strong> <strong>Precast</strong> C<strong>on</strong>crete <strong>Deck</strong> Panels)
• The list include informati<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> about 60<br />
projects about: Locati<strong>on</strong> (state, county),<br />
Year Completed, Girder Type, Rehab/New,<br />
Span Length, Skew………….
Table <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> C<strong>on</strong>tents<br />
A. Introducti<strong>on</strong>, C<strong>on</strong>cept & Advantages<br />
B. Comp<strong>on</strong>ent <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> FDDP*<br />
C. Details <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> FDDP*<br />
D. Miscellaneous issues<br />
E. Examples <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> successful projects<br />
F. Design Example<br />
G. Available resources<br />
(* FDDP = <strong>Full</strong>-<strong>Depth</strong> <strong>Precast</strong> C<strong>on</strong>crete <strong>Deck</strong> Panels)
Table <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> C<strong>on</strong>tents<br />
A. Introducti<strong>on</strong>, C<strong>on</strong>cept & Advantages<br />
B. Comp<strong>on</strong>ent <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> FDDP*<br />
C. Details <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> FDDP*<br />
D. Miscellaneous issues<br />
E. Examples <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> successful projects<br />
F. Design Example<br />
G. Available resources<br />
(* FDDP = <strong>Full</strong>-<strong>Depth</strong> <strong>Precast</strong> C<strong>on</strong>crete <strong>Deck</strong> Panels)
Available Resources<br />
PCI (www.pci.org)<br />
• <str<strong>on</strong>g>State</str<strong>on</strong>g>-<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>-<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>-art <str<strong>on</strong>g>Report</str<strong>on</strong>g> On <strong>Full</strong>-depth <strong>Precast</strong><br />
C<strong>on</strong>crete <strong>Bridge</strong> <strong>Deck</strong> Panels, PCI <str<strong>on</strong>g>Report</str<strong>on</strong>g> No. SOA -<br />
01-1911 (2011)<br />
• <strong>Full</strong> <strong>Depth</strong> <strong>Deck</strong> Panels Guidelines For Accelerated<br />
<strong>Bridge</strong> <strong>Deck</strong> Replacement Or C<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong>, PCI<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>Report</str<strong>on</strong>g> No. PCINER-11-FDDP, 2nd editi<strong>on</strong> (2011)<br />
• PCI Journal Papers (30+ papers, 1970s-2011).<br />
Citati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> many <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>se papers is provided in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
SOA report.
Available Resources<br />
NCHRP reports (http://www.trb.org/NCHRP/NCHRPProjects.aspx)<br />
• M. Tadros et al., “Rapid Replacement <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>Bridge</strong><br />
<strong>Deck</strong>s,” NCHRP 12-41, <str<strong>on</strong>g>Report</str<strong>on</strong>g> # 407 (1998)<br />
• S. Badie & M. Tadros, “<strong>Full</strong>-<strong>Depth</strong>, <strong>Precast</strong>-C<strong>on</strong>crete<br />
<strong>Bridge</strong> <strong>Deck</strong> Panel Systems,” NCHRP 12-65, <str<strong>on</strong>g>Report</str<strong>on</strong>g> #<br />
584 (2008)<br />
• C. French et al., “Evaluati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> CIP Reinforced Joints<br />
for <strong>Full</strong>-<strong>Depth</strong> <strong>Precast</strong> C<strong>on</strong>crete <strong>Bridge</strong> <strong>Deck</strong>s,”<br />
NCHRP 10-71, Web <strong>on</strong>ly document 173 (2011)
Available Resources<br />
Miscellaneous<br />
• DOT <str<strong>on</strong>g>Report</str<strong>on</strong>g>s<br />
• Journal papers:<br />
‣ ASCE <strong>Bridge</strong> Journal,<br />
‣ ACI Structural Journal,<br />
‣ C<strong>on</strong>crete Internati<strong>on</strong>al…..
Please Note: The full length (120 Minute) PCI Class <strong>on</strong> FDDP will be<br />
available in December <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 2011<br />
Thank You………..