05.11.2014 Views

The T-Stenting and Small Protrusion Technique for Bifurcation Lesions

The T-Stenting and Small Protrusion Technique for Bifurcation Lesions

The T-Stenting and Small Protrusion Technique for Bifurcation Lesions

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Transform your PDFs into Flipbooks and boost your revenue!

Leverage SEO-optimized Flipbooks, powerful backlinks, and multimedia content to professionally showcase your products and significantly increase your reach.

<strong>The</strong> T-<strong>Stenting</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Small</strong> <strong>Protrusion</strong><br />

<strong>Technique</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Bifurcation</strong> <strong>Lesions</strong><br />

(TAP-<strong>Stenting</strong>)<br />

Beijing Capital University<br />

Beijing Anzhen Hospital<br />

Zhou Yujie


Strategies on bifurcation lesions


DES <strong>Bifurcation</strong> <strong>Technique</strong><br />

Provisional side Two-stent strategy<br />

-branch strategy<br />

Stent implantation in the<br />

main branch <strong>and</strong> optional<br />

stent implantation at SB<br />

Stent implatation at both the<br />

main vessel <strong>and</strong> side branch<br />

• Crush<br />

• Provisional T-stenting<br />

• Reverse Crush<br />

• T stenting<br />

• Culotte<br />

• TAP<br />

• SKS<br />

• Y stenting


Nordic <strong>Bifurcation</strong> Study (n=413)<br />

Two-stent strategy (n=206)<br />

<strong>Stenting</strong> of the main vessel <strong>and</strong> side<br />

413 pts with<br />

bifurcation<br />

lesion<br />

R<strong>and</strong>omized<br />

branch (MV+SB)<br />

Provisional side-brach strategy (n=207)<br />

<strong>Stenting</strong> of the main vessel <strong>and</strong> optional<br />

stenting of the side branch (MV)<br />

Primary Endpoint: Major adverse cardiac event (MACE) at 6 months


Nordic <strong>Bifurcation</strong> Study (n=413)<br />

Primary Endpoint of MACE at 6 months (%)<br />

p=NS<br />

20%<br />

10%<br />

17.7%<br />

12.7%<br />

• <strong>The</strong>re was no<br />

difference in major<br />

adverse cardiac<br />

events at 6 months<br />

(17.7% vs 12.7%;<br />

p=NS)<br />

0%<br />

MV+SB group<br />

MV group<br />

Presented at ACC 2006


Nordic <strong>Bifurcation</strong> Study (n=413)<br />

Procedure Related Myocardial Infarction (%)<br />

15%<br />

13%<br />

10%<br />

p=0.008<br />

• Procedure related<br />

MI was defined as a<br />

five-fold fold elevation of<br />

biochemical<br />

markers<br />

5%<br />

0%<br />

MV+SB group<br />

4%<br />

MV group<br />

• Procedure related<br />

MI occurred more<br />

than three times as<br />

often in the MV+SB<br />

group (13% vs 4%;<br />

p=0.008)<br />

Presented at ACC 2006


Current opinions on PCI <strong>for</strong> bifurcation disease<br />

Optimal treatment of bifurcation disease has yet to<br />

be established<br />

<strong>The</strong> two-stent strategy offer no clinical advantage<br />

compared with the provisional side-branch strategy<br />

Provisional side-branch strategy is the most commonly<br />

adopted technique


Provisional side-branch strategy<br />

Provisional T-stenting<br />

Reverse Crush<br />

TAP<br />

• A sizable proportion of patients does require a stent<br />

on SB even if the intention is to try to avoid it<br />

• In TULIP study, a 34% rate of SB stenting has been<br />

reported (Brunel P, et al. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv<br />

2006;68:67-73)


<strong>The</strong> probelms of provisional T-stenting<br />

Bench Testing of provisional T-stenting<br />

A<br />

B


<strong>The</strong> probelms of provisional T-stenting<br />

It was difficult to place the side-branch<br />

stent precisely<br />

Deployment too distally leaves large<br />

gaps, which may lead to<br />

may lead to incomplete coverage<br />

of the ostium of the SB<br />

Deployment too proximally potentially<br />

obstructs the main branch


<strong>The</strong> probelms of Reverse Crush<br />

Bench Testing of Reverse Crush


Disadvantages of Reverse Crush<br />

• Accumulation of stent struts at the ostium of SB<br />

which could increase the risk of stent thrombosis<br />

• <strong>The</strong> need to re-cross multiple struts with a wire <strong>and</strong><br />

balloon makes the procedure more laborious


Model presentation of TAP technique


TAP technique<br />

Wire both branches<br />

<strong>and</strong> predilate<br />

Deploy stent in<br />

main branch


Wire side branch <strong>and</strong><br />

dilate<br />

Kissing balloon


SB stent<br />

positioning<br />

SB stent is<br />

deployed with the<br />

uninflated balloon<br />

into the MV


<strong>The</strong> balloon of<br />

the SB stent is<br />

slightly retrieved<br />

<strong>and</strong> aligned to<br />

the MV balloon<br />

Final kissing<br />

balloon


In vitro TAP stenting<br />

Perfect coverage of the<br />

bifurcation with<br />

minimal stent’s struts<br />

overlap at the proximal<br />

part of SB ostium


IVUS Image<br />

IVUS<br />

image of<br />

the main<br />

branch<br />

showing<br />

neocarina<br />

about 3<br />

mm in<br />

length


Advantages of the TAP technique<br />

Complete coverage of the vessel<br />

wall including the ostium of the SB<br />

Reduce the risk of SB ostium restenosis<br />

Without large multiple stent layers<br />

Reduce the risk of stent thrombosis


Differences between the Mini-<br />

Crush <strong>and</strong> the TAP technique


Mini-Crush is not a provisional side-branch strategy!


Differences between the Reverse<br />

Crush <strong>and</strong> the TAP technique


Reverse crushing technique<br />

Wire both<br />

branches <strong>and</strong><br />

predilate<br />

Deploy stent in<br />

main branch


Wire side branch <strong>and</strong><br />

dilate<br />

Position stent in side<br />

branch protruding<br />

in MB (3-5mm),<br />

leave a balloon in<br />

MB


Deploy stent in<br />

the side branch<br />

<strong>and</strong> remove wire<br />

<strong>and</strong> balloon<br />

Crush the<br />

protruding part of<br />

SB on top of the<br />

stent in MB


Rewire the side branch<br />

<strong>and</strong> per<strong>for</strong>m highpressure<br />

dilatation<br />

Kissing at medium<br />

pressure


6F<br />

Tips <strong>and</strong> tricks<br />

Size of Guiding Catheter<br />

7F<br />

8F<br />

0.070”<br />

0.071’’<br />

0.078”<br />

0.088”<br />

MV balloon shaft profile + SB stent shaft profile<br />

≤5.3F<br />

5.4F ~5.9F<br />

≥6.0F<br />

GC<br />

6 F 7 F 8 F


球 囊 种 类<br />

(≤3.5mm)<br />

推 送 杆 外 径<br />

Maverick 2 2.0F<br />

Ryujin 2.5F<br />

SeQuent 2.5F<br />

Avita 2.55F<br />

Sprinter 2.6F<br />

Crosssail 2.6F<br />

Kingou 2.6F<br />

Aqua T3 2.7F<br />

Powersail 2.9F<br />

AVION<br />

2.8F<br />

Extensor<br />

3.0<br />

Voyager<br />

2.7<br />

Grip<br />

2.6<br />

CTO<br />

2.5<br />

6F 导 引 导 管 进 行 球 囊 对 吻 技 术<br />

6F 导 引 导 管 的 内 径 :0.070〞<br />

0.071)<br />

5.4F>0.070″>5.3F<br />

6F 导 管 完 成 对 吻 扩 张<br />

两 球 囊 推 送 杆 外 径 之 和 应 ≤5.3F


选 用 导 引 导 管 :6F JL 3.5<br />

球 囊 外 径 :2.9F+2.6F=5.5F<br />

6F 导 管 内 径 :0.070 inch


Tips <strong>and</strong> tricks<br />

<strong>The</strong> optimal visualization of the stent is important<br />

<strong>for</strong> the precise positioning of SB stent, so stent with<br />

higher radio-opacity (such as Cypher) is preferable<br />

Good expansion of the MV stent <strong>and</strong> optimal<br />

predilation of the SB ostium could facilitate the<br />

advancement of the SB stent


Case of TAP stenting


Coronary Angiography


6F EBU 3.5<br />

BMW<br />

BMW<br />

3.0×24mm<br />

Cypher


Kissing balloon after<br />

rewiring of SB<br />

Deployment MV stent<br />

with jailed guidewire<br />

into the SB


SB stent positioning<br />

MV balloon<br />

SB stent<br />

<strong>The</strong> position of the<br />

SB stent is<br />

adjusted to fully<br />

cover the proximal<br />

part of the SB<br />

ostium (red arrow)<br />

while an<br />

uninflated balloon<br />

kept into the MV


SB stent deployment<br />

SB is deployed with<br />

the uninflated<br />

balloon into MV


Final kissing balloon<br />

<strong>The</strong> balloon of the<br />

SB stent is slightly<br />

retrieved <strong>and</strong><br />

aligned to the MV<br />

balloon<br />

Final kissing balloon<br />

SB stent’s balloon<br />

+ MV balloon


Final Result


Clinical study of TAP<br />

Burzotta F, et al.<br />

Catheterization <strong>and</strong> Cardiovascular<br />

Interventions 2007, 70:75–82


Angiographic characteristics<br />

Target lesion n=61<br />

Distal LM 26<br />

LAD/diagonal 28<br />

LCX/OM 5<br />

RCA/descending posterior 2<br />

Angulation between main <strong>and</strong> side-branch<br />

Angle70° 26


Procedure characteristics<br />

Approach<br />

Transradial 24<br />

Transfemoral 37<br />

Guiding catheter size<br />

6 Fr<br />

2<br />

7 Fr 25<br />

8 Fr 34<br />

Procedure time<br />

112±52min


Clinical outcome (9 month)<br />

MACE 4 (6.6%)<br />

Death 1 (1.6%)<br />

Myocardial infarction 0<br />

TLR 3 (4.9%)<br />

Stent thrombosis<br />

Definited 1 (1.6%)<br />

Suspected 1 (1.6%)<br />

Patients without MACE 56 (91.8%)


Thank you<br />

<strong>for</strong> your attention!

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!