Standards for aerodrome bird/wildlife control - International Bird ...
Standards for aerodrome bird/wildlife control - International Bird ...
Standards for aerodrome bird/wildlife control - International Bird ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
advisable in order to identify what it is that is attracting the <strong>bird</strong>s/<strong>wildlife</strong> to the<br />
airefield. Obviously, the attraction will vary from one species to another.<br />
Habitat Management<br />
Cleared and netted drainage channels offer no <strong>bird</strong><br />
attration whilst maximising their drainage functions<br />
Once the attraction has been<br />
identified, a management plan<br />
should be developed either to<br />
remove it entirely, reduce it in<br />
quantity, or to deny access to it.<br />
Because airfields around the<br />
world are all different and<br />
because the <strong>bird</strong>/<strong>wildlife</strong> species<br />
that frequent them vary from<br />
region to region, it is not possible<br />
to define precisely what types of<br />
habitat management will be<br />
effective at a particular site.<br />
Typical examples include<br />
manipulating the species and/or<br />
height of vegetation cover on the<br />
airport, removal of trees and bushes, netting of water bodies, excluding <strong>bird</strong>s from<br />
buildings by netting or other means, selection of non-attractive amenity planting<br />
around terminals etc.. Whatever techniques are used, all airports should be able to<br />
show that they have assessed the <strong>bird</strong> attractions on their property and developed<br />
and implemented a habitat management plan to reduce these attractions as far as is<br />
practicable.<br />
Water retention ponds can be proofed against <strong>Bird</strong>s<br />
with netting or, as in this case with floating ‘<strong>bird</strong> balls’<br />
8