18.11.2014 Views

Meditation Alters Perceptual Rivalry in Tibetan Buddhist Monks

Meditation Alters Perceptual Rivalry in Tibetan Buddhist Monks

Meditation Alters Perceptual Rivalry in Tibetan Buddhist Monks

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Meditation</strong> <strong>Alters</strong> <strong>Perceptual</strong> <strong>Rivalry</strong> <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>Tibetan</strong> <strong>Buddhist</strong> <strong>Monks</strong><br />

Olivia Carter<br />

&<br />

Jack Pettigrew<br />

University of Queensland<br />

Australia<br />

Vision Touch and Hear<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Research Centre


Aims & Motivation - <strong>Meditation</strong><br />

1) To explore claims that tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> meditation<br />

can lead to <strong>in</strong>creased control and stability of<br />

mental processes.<br />

2) To <strong>in</strong>vestigate whether this <strong>in</strong>creased control<br />

and stability can be seen <strong>in</strong> the visual doma<strong>in</strong>.


B<strong>in</strong>ocular <strong>Rivalry</strong><br />

LEFT EYE<br />

RIGHT EYE


B<strong>in</strong>ocular <strong>Rivalry</strong><br />

LEFT EYE<br />

RIGHT EYE


Motion Induced Bl<strong>in</strong>dness (MIB)


B<strong>in</strong>ocular rivalry - neurophysiology<br />

Low level/high level debate<br />

- Some say rivalry <strong>in</strong>volves multiple levels of<br />

competition and may share mechanisms <strong>in</strong>volved<br />

<strong>in</strong> very general processes like attention and<br />

decision mak<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

- Other studies suggest that rivalry is resolved very<br />

early <strong>in</strong> the visual processes and is unlikely to be<br />

strongly <strong>in</strong>fluenced by attention.


<strong>Meditation</strong> - <strong>in</strong>troduction<br />

One-po<strong>in</strong>t<br />

“Susta<strong>in</strong>ed focus on a s<strong>in</strong>gle object or thought, lead<strong>in</strong>g<br />

to the stability and clarity of m<strong>in</strong>d required for development<br />

of <strong>in</strong>trospective understand<strong>in</strong>g and <strong>in</strong>sight.”<br />

Compassion<br />

“Non-referential<br />

(no s<strong>in</strong>gle po<strong>in</strong>t of attentional focus)<br />

contemplation on the suffer<strong>in</strong>g of others while radiat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

good will and compassion.”


<strong>Meditation</strong> - neurophysiology<br />

Different types of meditation l<strong>in</strong>ked to dist<strong>in</strong>ct patterns of<br />

neural activity (Lehmann<br />

et al, 2001)<br />

- “Focused” styles of meditation leads to <strong>in</strong>creased activation of<br />

frontal regions of the cortex (Newberg et al, 2001)<br />

- Compassion meditation l<strong>in</strong>ked to <strong>in</strong>creased gamma-band<br />

synchronization across distributed neural regions (Lutz et al 2004)<br />

Greater changes <strong>in</strong> neural activity is seen <strong>in</strong> meditators<br />

with the most experience (Lutz et al 2004)


<strong>Meditation</strong> - <strong>in</strong>troduction<br />

<strong>Buddhist</strong> monks were tested at 4 monasteries <strong>in</strong> Northern India.<br />

Afghanistan<br />

Samstanl<strong>in</strong>g Monastery<br />

Jammu<br />

& Kashmir<br />

Pakistan<br />

Thiksey<br />

Monastery<br />

Kotsang<br />

Monastery<br />

Namgyal Monastery,<br />

Dharamsala<br />

Thiksey Monastery, Ladakh


B<strong>in</strong>ocular <strong>Rivalry</strong><br />

LEFT EYE<br />

Virtual Reality<br />

Head Mounted Display<br />

(HMD) Goggles<br />

RIGHT EYE


76 monks (5-54 54 years tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g)<br />

<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g 3 “retreatest” meditators<br />

- 23 monks tested on b<strong>in</strong>ocular rivalry<br />

1 st ) Familiarization<br />

Methods<br />

2 nd ) Experimental conditions<br />

- 1 non-meditation condition & 3 different view<strong>in</strong>g conditions<br />

<strong>Rivalry</strong> dur<strong>in</strong>g meditation<br />

(button-press & verbal report)<br />

<strong>Rivalry</strong> after meditation<br />

(button-press & verbal report)<br />

<strong>Rivalry</strong> dur<strong>in</strong>g meditation<br />

(verbal report only)


Results – Switch Rate<br />

Proportion of monks report<strong>in</strong>g effect (%)<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

Faster<br />

Slower<br />

Stable/no switch<strong>in</strong>g<br />

0<br />

Compassion<br />

<strong>Rivalry</strong> dur<strong>in</strong>g meditation<br />

(n = 13)<br />

*Button response = 6/13<br />

One po<strong>in</strong>t<br />

<strong>Rivalry</strong> after meditation<br />

(n = 14)<br />

*Button response = 11/14<br />

One po<strong>in</strong>t<br />

<strong>Rivalry</strong> dur<strong>in</strong>g meditation<br />

(n = 16)<br />

*Button response = 0/16<br />

Carter et al. . (2005) Current Biology 15: : R412-R413<br />

R413


Results – Switch Rate<br />

Button response data from 1 subject<br />

15<br />

No meditation<br />

(‘pretest’)<br />

Vertical<br />

4<br />

After 5m<strong>in</strong>s of<br />

one-po<strong>in</strong>t meditation<br />

Vertical<br />

# of responses<br />

0<br />

Mixed<br />

Horizontal<br />

# of responses<br />

0<br />

Mixed<br />

Horizontal<br />

20<br />

2 4 6 8 10 12<br />

<strong>Perceptual</strong> duration (sec)<br />

4<br />

2 4 6 8 10 12<br />

<strong>Perceptual</strong> duration (sec)<br />

Carter et al. . (2005) Current Biology 15: : R412-R413<br />

R413


Proportion of monks (%)<br />

0.70<br />

0.60<br />

0.50<br />

0.40<br />

0.30<br />

0.20<br />

Results – Qualitative changes<br />

Mixed / Transitional state<br />

More mixed<br />

Less mixed<br />

No change from<br />

non-meditation pretest<br />

0.10<br />

0<br />

Compassion<br />

<strong>Rivalry</strong> dur<strong>in</strong>g meditation<br />

(n = 13*)<br />

*Button response = 6/13<br />

One po<strong>in</strong>t<br />

<strong>Rivalry</strong> after meditation<br />

(n = 14*)<br />

*Button response = 11/14<br />

One po<strong>in</strong>t<br />

<strong>Rivalry</strong> dur<strong>in</strong>g meditation<br />

(n = 16*)<br />

*Button response = 0/16<br />

0.50<br />

Qualitative changes<br />

Proportion of monks (%)<br />

0.40<br />

0.30<br />

0.20<br />

0.10<br />

0<br />

No<br />

<strong>Meditation</strong><br />

Compassion<br />

dur<strong>in</strong>g<br />

One po<strong>in</strong>t<br />

after<br />

One po<strong>in</strong>t<br />

dur<strong>in</strong>g


Results - MIB<br />

MIB mean disappearance time<br />

35<br />

Number of Individuals<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

Non-meditators<br />

Meditators<br />

0<br />

0 5<br />

10 15<br />

20<br />

Seconds<br />

128 723<br />

Carter et al. . (2005) Current Biology 15: : R412-R413<br />

R413


Summary<br />

1) <strong>Meditation</strong> appears to slow/stop perceptual rivalry<br />

switch<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

2) Effect is specific to focused style of one-po<strong>in</strong>t meditation.<br />

3) Suggests a l<strong>in</strong>k between attention and b<strong>in</strong>ocular rivalry.<br />

3) Supports <strong>in</strong>trospective reports of monks that they are<br />

able to control and stabilize the contents of their m<strong>in</strong>ds.<br />

4) Future studies are needed to confirm and explore<br />

these f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> more detail.


Acknowledgements<br />

University of Queensland<br />

Jack Pettigrew<br />

G. B. Liu<br />

Chloe Callistemon<br />

University of California Berkeley<br />

David Presti<br />

Dharamasala India<br />

His Hol<strong>in</strong>ess the 14th Dalai Lama<br />

Tenz<strong>in</strong> Geyche<br />

Tenz<strong>in</strong> Sherab<br />

Tser<strong>in</strong>g Topgyal<br />

Tashi Choephel

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!