19.11.2014 Views

Women and Poverty (1989) - Combat Poverty Agency

Women and Poverty (1989) - Combat Poverty Agency

Women and Poverty (1989) - Combat Poverty Agency

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

wife) can be difficult to satisfy. Peter Ward's research found a<br />

57% success rate among a sample of 266 applications for<br />

:deserted wife.'s' payments over the last seventeen years, for<br />

mstan~e. WhIle valued for its security, welfare can be<br />

degradmg .for. women reari~g children on their own. Applying<br />

the cohabllanon rule for mstance - where welfare officials<br />

seek. to ~stabl~sh whether a woman claimant is· having a<br />

relanonshIP. wIth a man - can be deeply invasive of a<br />

woman's pnvacy. ' . . .<br />

The number of one-parent families is growing in Irel<strong>and</strong>, as<br />

elsewhere. By 1986 the number of one-parent families had<br />

grown to ~ver 97,000, maki~g up 10% of all private<br />

house~olds .m. Irel<strong>and</strong>. Trends m Irel<strong>and</strong> may soon mirror<br />

those m Bntam where one-parent families were the fastest<br />

grO\y~ng group in poverty during the 1970s.(15) One-parent<br />

farmhes ~ow ~~e up nearly half of all the families living in<br />

poverty m Bntam. Such trends are seemingly universal:<br />

between one-quarter <strong>and</strong> one-third of all families worldwide<br />

are supported by women <strong>and</strong> these families have been found<br />

to be le.ading c<strong>and</strong>idates for poverty <strong>and</strong> hardship.(16) One of<br />

~e ~m ~easons why one-par~nt families have both a high<br />

nsk 01 bemg poor <strong>and</strong> of staYIng poor is because they are<br />

~enied access to the most effective route out of poverty: fullnme<br />

employment for both parents.(17)<br />

Elderly <strong>Women</strong><br />

In Irel<strong>and</strong> in 1986, there were 384,355 people aged 65 years<br />

<strong>and</strong> over, representing 11% ofthe population. The numbers of<br />

elderly are growing all the time so that there is a general<br />

ageing of the population - as people are livinglonger we have<br />

more old <strong>and</strong> very old people. <strong>Women</strong> dominate the over 65s<br />

in greater numbers as one moves up the age range: 56% of all<br />

those over the age of 65 are women, but women are twothirds<br />

of all those who reach, 80 years of age. Although the<br />

ESRI research suggested·that poverty among the elderly had<br />

declined !Jetween 1980 <strong>and</strong> 1987, the general consensus of<br />

research IS that more women than men end their lives in<br />

poverty. . . ,<br />

There.are a number of reasons for this. First, women live<br />

longer; since l?ld age is closely associated with poverty,<br />

women predonunate among the aging poor. Secondly, women<br />

are poorer before they reach old age - throughout their lives<br />

they have had less access than men to all kinds ~f resourc.es<br />

but especially employment (<strong>and</strong> therefore occupanonal SOCIal<br />

welfare benefits, including a contributory pension). <strong>Women</strong>,<br />

then, are less likely than men tp have savings <strong>and</strong> assets with<br />

which they can supplement their income when they are older.<br />

Thirdly, elderly women are more vulnerable to poverty,<br />

isolation <strong>and</strong> loneliness because the majority of them. are<br />

either widowed or single, whereas the majo~ty of ~lderly men<br />

are married. Finally, <strong>and</strong> related to the prevIous pomt, women<br />

are more likely to live alone - for every one m~. over 65<br />

years of age living alone there are two women. LIvmg alone<br />

is closely linked to poverty among the elderly - a recent study<br />

found that 73% of the elderly living alone fell below a<br />

minimum income st<strong>and</strong>ard.(18)<br />

The situation here is similar to that elsewhere. In Britain, for<br />

instance, a hierarchy of financial security exists among the<br />

elderly. Couples are the most secure, then men on their own<br />

<strong>and</strong> finally lone women.(19)<br />

<strong>Women</strong> in ·'Minorities'<br />

Two groups of women have an especially high risk ofpoverty<br />

in Irel<strong>and</strong>: women from the traveller community <strong>and</strong> women<br />

who are homeless. Many in these groups a:e excluded fro!Jl<br />

conventional poverty research: they are unlikely to appear m<br />

the recent ESRI research, for instance, because it is'based on<br />

a sample of the Register of Electors <strong>and</strong> they are rarely<br />

registered." .' . " -. '<br />

Traveller women are at a very high risk ofpoverty, not only<br />

because they are members of a community that is itself very<br />

vulnerable to poverty but also because of their lower status<br />

within that community, At the -time of the! last qensusof<br />

travellers in 1986, 7,863 women travellers were enumerated<br />

(there were 7,883 men).(20) Life is very harsh fOf,traveller<br />

women: on average the Census ~howed that; wo~ent~nd to<br />

marry very young, raise ten chIldren, have a hIgh nsk of<br />

losing some of their children at birth or in ~arly ?hil~ood,<br />

<strong>and</strong> will themselves die at a younger age than women m the<br />

settled community. Life is lived in,very poor conditions ­<br />

nearly half of all traveller families still live in cjaravans, a<br />

quarter on the side of the road. Think what: this means for, a<br />

18<br />

19

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!