Part 5: Final Recommendation - SUNY Cobleskill
Part 5: Final Recommendation - SUNY Cobleskill
Part 5: Final Recommendation - SUNY Cobleskill
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
L<br />
DEMOLITION<br />
<strong>SUNY</strong> <strong>Cobleskill</strong> Facilities Master Plan – Phase 5 Report<br />
November 2011<br />
L – DEMOLITION<br />
M – TECHNOLOGY<br />
Sculpture on the <strong>SUNY</strong> <strong>Cobleskill</strong><br />
Campus<br />
The FMP proposes the demolition of select buildings that have exceeded<br />
their useful life expectancy, are in poor condition, requiring extensive<br />
renovations, and are programmatically not suitable for alternate services.<br />
It is important, where possible, to reduce substandard existing inventory<br />
of inadequate space as new space comes on-line. (Refer to page 62)<br />
The main technology spaces serving the campus in Warner-Holmes<br />
Hall and the Knapp Hall are neat and clean with proper labeling and<br />
identification in place.<br />
<strong>Recommendation</strong>s to improve existing systems are as follows:<br />
The final FMP recommends the demolition of six of buildings:<br />
Ryder Hall is to be demolished and replaced by turf. The building is<br />
obsolete, not code compliant, is difficult to utilize and has significant<br />
building system issues. Given these concerns, the limited value of the<br />
building and the high cost to rehabilitate, Ryder Hall does not warrant<br />
renovation. Program is to be relocated to Frisbee Hall, Home Economics<br />
Hall and Warner-Holmes Hall.<br />
Brickyard Point is to be demolished. It is has significant building system<br />
concerns, does not have an elevator and its design makes it difficult to<br />
reprogram. Given these concerns and its prime location, Brickyard Point<br />
does not warrant renovation. The proposed Student & Community Center<br />
will be located on this site, and will house programming from Brickyard.<br />
Beard Wellness Center is to be demolished and replaced by turf. This<br />
building is of low utility and in need of significant repair. It is salvageable,<br />
but in a key location that is better utilized by a building that fronts Route<br />
7 and the Lower Quad. The building’s program is to be relocated to the<br />
Student & Community Center.<br />
Champlin Hall is to be demolished and replaced by turf. The upper level<br />
of the building is awkward and difficult to program, there are significant<br />
structural issues with some of the exterior walls, building systems are in<br />
significant need of repair and the dining and kitchen areas need to be<br />
significantly upgraded. While the building could be salvaged, it would be<br />
at a significant cost with little long-term value. Program is to be relocated<br />
to Prentice Hall and the new Student & Community Center.<br />
Porter Hall is to be demolished and replaced by turf. The building has<br />
significant system upgrade needs and is an undesirable and uncompetitive<br />
building design and housing-type for today’s prospective students.<br />
Program is to be relocated to new housing elsewhere on campus.<br />
Kniskern House is to be demolished and replaced by turf. The building<br />
is obsolete, not code compliant and in significant need of repair. Given<br />
these concerns, the limited value of the building and the high cost to<br />
rehabilitate, Kniskern House does not warrant renovation. Program is to<br />
be relocated to the new University Police building.<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
Commission a study to analyze and re-design the campus<br />
signal conduit and manhole system. Currently the system lacks<br />
physical route diversity and logical redundancy. In addition, a set<br />
of cables running between the North and South campuses were<br />
installed without the protection of a concrete-encased ductbank;<br />
this should be remedied at the same time as any conduit work<br />
is being performed. As more and more technologies converge<br />
and require use of the campus network backbone, the more<br />
important these issues become. The full extent of a conduit<br />
upgrade/replacement project is unknown at this time; all that is<br />
known is that inter-building distribution was flagged as a major<br />
concern during Phase II of this FMP.<br />
All existing inter- and intra-building 62.5 µm multimode fiber optic<br />
cable should be replaced with 50 µm laser optimized multimode<br />
cable [OM3 rated] which will support 10 Gbps network speeds<br />
up to a distance of 300 meters (almost 1,000 feet) with relatively<br />
low-cost emitters. If longer distances are required, then OM4<br />
rated multimode fiber optic cable should be installed (for cable<br />
pulls between 300 and 550 meters). A minimum of 24-strands<br />
should be installed between the Building Distribution Frame (BDF)<br />
and all IDFs in each respective building, to support the eventual<br />
upgrade path to 40 and 100 Gbps backbone speeds (i.e. 40<br />
Gbps requires 8 fiber strands and 100 Gbps requires 20 for fullduplex<br />
transmission).<br />
Standardize, then implement, a uniform structured cabling system<br />
labeling scheme for the campus. This will improve network<br />
troubleshooting and moves-adds-changes around campus.<br />
Document all existing Wireless Access Point [WAP] locations on<br />
a set of building floor plans for indoor WAPS, and campus-level<br />
plans for outdoor WAPs. Maintain updated plans as new WAPs<br />
are deployed.<br />
Increase the Wireless LAN [WLAN] coverage area to encompass<br />
100% of the campus, to support ubiquitous network connectivity.<br />
This should not require the deployment of a large number of<br />
WAPs, since the existing coverage area was described as “close<br />
to 100%” with the exception of some back-of-house areas.<br />
68