Preventing Childhood Obesity - Evidence Policy and Practice.pdf
Preventing Childhood Obesity - Evidence Policy and Practice.pdf
Preventing Childhood Obesity - Evidence Policy and Practice.pdf
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Social marketing to prevent childhood obesity<br />
Box 28.8 Multiple promotion<br />
approaches<br />
Many of EPODE ’ s promotion activities are focused at<br />
the local level, advertising local initiatives <strong>and</strong> events,<br />
using personal selling through, for example, doctors<br />
<strong>and</strong> teachers to promote the message. However, the<br />
extensive publicity the program has received is seen<br />
as encouraging more towns to enter the program. It<br />
could also have the effect of reinforcing a social norm<br />
around the program ’ s activities which would encourage<br />
families to be involved.<br />
aired on prime - time news broadcasts. Personal selling<br />
is important in commercial sales of items like computers<br />
<strong>and</strong> cars but can be equally effective when one -<br />
on - one selling is included in the social marketing<br />
strategy to sell the idea of a health behavior, for<br />
example, using teachers, coaches <strong>and</strong> doctors. Perhaps<br />
one area that social marketers could consider more is<br />
that of sales promotions. In commercial marketing<br />
this refers to free samples, discounts or gift. Sales promotions<br />
in social marketing are “ incentives ” or “ facilitators<br />
” . Offers for a week ’ s free trial at a gym or prizes<br />
available for those entering a competition would fall<br />
into the category of “ sales promotions ” . The EPODE<br />
program uses many of these approaches to promotion<br />
(Box 28.8 ).<br />
Partnerships<br />
In the context of obesity, “ Partnerships ” is a fifth<br />
essential marketing mix element as the problem can<br />
only be solved by an integrated effort involving<br />
numerous agencies <strong>and</strong> stakeholders 24 including education<br />
departments, schools, teachers, parents, health<br />
departments <strong>and</strong> health professionals, regulatory<br />
bodies, the food industry, commercial marketing<br />
industry, <strong>and</strong> so on. Combining public <strong>and</strong> private<br />
partners in a common endeavor is a powerful strategy<br />
for engagement, particularly if there is joint funding.<br />
However, there are important considerations in defining<br />
those relationships to ensure that the content <strong>and</strong><br />
delivery of public health programs or messages are not<br />
influenced commercial factors (Box 28.9 ).<br />
Incorporating the e vidence<br />
The many decisions made in the development of any<br />
social marketing campaign need to be supported by<br />
Box 28.9 Public – private<br />
partnerships<br />
A key element of EPODE is the public – private partnership.<br />
Funding for the program comes from a mix of<br />
public <strong>and</strong> private partnerships at the national <strong>and</strong><br />
local levels. National private sponsors have, to date,<br />
come primarily from the food industry, insurance <strong>and</strong><br />
distribution sectors. These partners sign a charter to<br />
confirm their intention to support this public health<br />
project focusing on preventing childhood obesity,<br />
promising that the program will not be referred to in<br />
any product promotion, <strong>and</strong> that they will not intervene<br />
in any way in the program content <strong>and</strong> will<br />
refer to their involvement only in corporate<br />
communications.<br />
evidence, whether formative research with the primary<br />
<strong>and</strong> secondary target audiences, or, as in the case of<br />
EPODE, evidence from scientific literature <strong>and</strong> field<br />
experience. In addition, there is (<strong>and</strong> should be) an<br />
element of the marketers ’ judgement about what will<br />
work: “ We must allow hunch <strong>and</strong> common sense<br />
<strong>and</strong> — above all, vision ” (p. 7). 6<br />
Conclusion<br />
Effective social marketing requires coordinated<br />
approaches both upstream (environmental, policy<br />
changes) <strong>and</strong> downstream (individual behavior<br />
changes). In practice, social marketing campaigns<br />
need to be sustained over time to create change at a<br />
cultural or societal level. We have been successful in<br />
recent years in changing normative attitudes, for<br />
example, towards drinking <strong>and</strong> driving, <strong>and</strong> making<br />
smoking less cool. We have also had successes in the<br />
challenging public health fields of HIV/Aids, cot<br />
deaths <strong>and</strong> some cancers. 25 We are now trying to<br />
create social norms that physical activity <strong>and</strong> healthy<br />
eating are desirable. This will require commitments<br />
from governments for strategic, long - term funding,<br />
“ measured in decades not years ” (p. 192) 26 for<br />
comprehensive, innovative <strong>and</strong> properly evaluated<br />
25<br />
interventions.<br />
Knowledge alone is not enough to change people ’ s<br />
behavior. The principles of social marketing are not<br />
intellectually difficult or necessarily expensive but<br />
they do provide “intelligent solutions ” 5 to important<br />
251