21.11.2014 Views

Preventing Childhood Obesity - Evidence Policy and Practice.pdf

Preventing Childhood Obesity - Evidence Policy and Practice.pdf

Preventing Childhood Obesity - Evidence Policy and Practice.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Social marketing to prevent childhood obesity<br />

Box 28.8 Multiple promotion<br />

approaches<br />

Many of EPODE ’ s promotion activities are focused at<br />

the local level, advertising local initiatives <strong>and</strong> events,<br />

using personal selling through, for example, doctors<br />

<strong>and</strong> teachers to promote the message. However, the<br />

extensive publicity the program has received is seen<br />

as encouraging more towns to enter the program. It<br />

could also have the effect of reinforcing a social norm<br />

around the program ’ s activities which would encourage<br />

families to be involved.<br />

aired on prime - time news broadcasts. Personal selling<br />

is important in commercial sales of items like computers<br />

<strong>and</strong> cars but can be equally effective when one -<br />

on - one selling is included in the social marketing<br />

strategy to sell the idea of a health behavior, for<br />

example, using teachers, coaches <strong>and</strong> doctors. Perhaps<br />

one area that social marketers could consider more is<br />

that of sales promotions. In commercial marketing<br />

this refers to free samples, discounts or gift. Sales promotions<br />

in social marketing are “ incentives ” or “ facilitators<br />

” . Offers for a week ’ s free trial at a gym or prizes<br />

available for those entering a competition would fall<br />

into the category of “ sales promotions ” . The EPODE<br />

program uses many of these approaches to promotion<br />

(Box 28.8 ).<br />

Partnerships<br />

In the context of obesity, “ Partnerships ” is a fifth<br />

essential marketing mix element as the problem can<br />

only be solved by an integrated effort involving<br />

numerous agencies <strong>and</strong> stakeholders 24 including education<br />

departments, schools, teachers, parents, health<br />

departments <strong>and</strong> health professionals, regulatory<br />

bodies, the food industry, commercial marketing<br />

industry, <strong>and</strong> so on. Combining public <strong>and</strong> private<br />

partners in a common endeavor is a powerful strategy<br />

for engagement, particularly if there is joint funding.<br />

However, there are important considerations in defining<br />

those relationships to ensure that the content <strong>and</strong><br />

delivery of public health programs or messages are not<br />

influenced commercial factors (Box 28.9 ).<br />

Incorporating the e vidence<br />

The many decisions made in the development of any<br />

social marketing campaign need to be supported by<br />

Box 28.9 Public – private<br />

partnerships<br />

A key element of EPODE is the public – private partnership.<br />

Funding for the program comes from a mix of<br />

public <strong>and</strong> private partnerships at the national <strong>and</strong><br />

local levels. National private sponsors have, to date,<br />

come primarily from the food industry, insurance <strong>and</strong><br />

distribution sectors. These partners sign a charter to<br />

confirm their intention to support this public health<br />

project focusing on preventing childhood obesity,<br />

promising that the program will not be referred to in<br />

any product promotion, <strong>and</strong> that they will not intervene<br />

in any way in the program content <strong>and</strong> will<br />

refer to their involvement only in corporate<br />

communications.<br />

evidence, whether formative research with the primary<br />

<strong>and</strong> secondary target audiences, or, as in the case of<br />

EPODE, evidence from scientific literature <strong>and</strong> field<br />

experience. In addition, there is (<strong>and</strong> should be) an<br />

element of the marketers ’ judgement about what will<br />

work: “ We must allow hunch <strong>and</strong> common sense<br />

<strong>and</strong> — above all, vision ” (p. 7). 6<br />

Conclusion<br />

Effective social marketing requires coordinated<br />

approaches both upstream (environmental, policy<br />

changes) <strong>and</strong> downstream (individual behavior<br />

changes). In practice, social marketing campaigns<br />

need to be sustained over time to create change at a<br />

cultural or societal level. We have been successful in<br />

recent years in changing normative attitudes, for<br />

example, towards drinking <strong>and</strong> driving, <strong>and</strong> making<br />

smoking less cool. We have also had successes in the<br />

challenging public health fields of HIV/Aids, cot<br />

deaths <strong>and</strong> some cancers. 25 We are now trying to<br />

create social norms that physical activity <strong>and</strong> healthy<br />

eating are desirable. This will require commitments<br />

from governments for strategic, long - term funding,<br />

“ measured in decades not years ” (p. 192) 26 for<br />

comprehensive, innovative <strong>and</strong> properly evaluated<br />

25<br />

interventions.<br />

Knowledge alone is not enough to change people ’ s<br />

behavior. The principles of social marketing are not<br />

intellectually difficult or necessarily expensive but<br />

they do provide “intelligent solutions ” 5 to important<br />

251

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!