22.11.2014 Views

ALBERTA RULES OF COURT PROJECT Enforcement of Judgments ...

ALBERTA RULES OF COURT PROJECT Enforcement of Judgments ...

ALBERTA RULES OF COURT PROJECT Enforcement of Judgments ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

4<br />

G. The Rules Should Where Possible Aim for General Propositions Rather<br />

than a Series <strong>of</strong> Specific but Similar Situations<br />

[10] Some enforcement rules amount to examples or illustrations <strong>of</strong> a broader<br />

principle. There are two examples.<br />

1. There are numerous rules about getting possession, control or delivery <strong>of</strong><br />

personal property. These separate rules should be brought together and<br />

rationalized. The aim is to express the broad principle directly and clearly.<br />

2. The new rules should include a list <strong>of</strong> possible remedial orders which a court<br />

may give against someone who acts contrary to or who disobeys a court order<br />

other than an order for the payment <strong>of</strong> money. The list would include but would<br />

not be limited to contempt. This idea is developed further in Chapter 13.<br />

H. Remedies Should as a General Rule be Immediately Available<br />

[11] Once a litigant has obtained a judgment, the remedies necessary to enforce that<br />

judgment should be immediately available. The rights <strong>of</strong> the parties have been settled.<br />

There should be no requirement that the successful litigant must go to court again to<br />

seek leave to issue remedies. This principle should not apply where the judgment itself<br />

says otherwise or where it is dangerous to permit enforcement without prior judicial<br />

scrutiny, for example, where immediate deployment <strong>of</strong> remedies will do a serious and<br />

irreparable injury to the unsuccessful litigant.<br />

I. Rules Dealing with a Subject Governed by a Statute Should Where<br />

Appropriate be Moved into the Statute or Regulation Thereunder<br />

[12] Under this heading, we are thinking particularly <strong>of</strong> the Civil <strong>Enforcement</strong> Act 8<br />

but there are other examples. Many rules are confined to issues governed and<br />

regulated by a statute. In all such cases, we should consider moving the rule into the<br />

statute or into regulations created under the statute.<br />

1. If the law is concentrated in one place, it is more likely to be coherent and<br />

integrated. Dividing the law <strong>of</strong> creditors’ remedies between the Civil<br />

8<br />

R.S.A. 2000, c. C-15.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!