23.11.2014 Views

Ph.D. thesis (pdf) - dirac

Ph.D. thesis (pdf) - dirac

Ph.D. thesis (pdf) - dirac

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

80 Alpha Relaxation<br />

log10(τ α<br />

)<br />

2<br />

1<br />

0<br />

−1<br />

−2<br />

−3<br />

−4<br />

−5<br />

−6<br />

205.5 K<br />

219.3 K<br />

236.3 K<br />

253.9 K<br />

Patm<br />

234 MPa<br />

Sekula<br />

Paluch 295.5 K<br />

Cook 295.5 K<br />

e(ρ)<br />

2.5<br />

2<br />

ρ 2.5<br />

e(ρ)<br />

−7<br />

1.5<br />

−8<br />

1.1 1.2 1.3<br />

ρ [g/cm 3 ]<br />

−9<br />

4 5 6<br />

e(ρ)/T<br />

7 8<br />

x 10 −3<br />

Figure 5.7: The alpha-relaxation times shown in figure 5.5 plotted as a function of<br />

X = e(ρ)/T, with increasing dloge(ρ)/ dlogρ as ρ increases. The inset shows the<br />

density-dependent activation energy e(ρ) (dashed line) used in the scaling variable<br />

dlog e(ρ)<br />

X = e(ρ)/T for collapsing data in (a) (the associated x(ρ) =<br />

dlog ρ<br />

increases from<br />

1.5 to 3.5 in the density range under study). We also display the power law giving<br />

the best scaling, ρ 2.5 , at low density (full line).<br />

2004; Mandanici et al., 2005] and references therein.)<br />

In the inset of figure 5.9 we show the pressure-dependent relaxation time at 216.4 K.<br />

Extrapolating the data to τ α = 100 s leads to P g = 340 ± 10 MPa, corresponding to<br />

dT g /dP = 0.085 K.MPa −1 . This value is, as we also saw it in the case of DBP, about<br />

a factor 2 higher than the dT g /dP = 0.045 K.MPa −1 reported for the calorimetric<br />

glass transition by Alba-Simionesco et al. [1997]. This could suggest that this type<br />

of decoupling is common, however there are also examples where no such decoupling<br />

is found [Chauty-Cailliaux, 2003].<br />

In figure 5.9 we show the alpha-relaxation time as a function of density along the<br />

atmospheric pressure isobar (data from Mandanici et al. [2005]) and the 216.4 K<br />

isotherm (see appendix A regarding the determination of density). The data taken<br />

at atmospheric pressure and the data taken along the 216.4 K isotherm cover two<br />

different ranges in density. It is therefore not possible from this data to verify the<br />

validity of the scaling in X = e(ρ)/T. Moreover, it is seen in figure 5.9 that there<br />

is not complete agreement at ambient pressure between the two experiments. Our<br />

data actually correspond better to the results of Carpentier et al. [2004] than those<br />

of Mandanici et al. [2005]; it would be ideal to measure the high pressure and the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!