Femto laser asisted I.C.R implantation in treatment of ... - RM Solutions
Femto laser asisted I.C.R implantation in treatment of ... - RM Solutions
Femto laser asisted I.C.R implantation in treatment of ... - RM Solutions
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
11/18/2012<br />
<strong>Femto</strong> <strong>laser</strong> assisted I.C.R<br />
<strong>implantation</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>treatment</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />
keratoconus<br />
Tarek Salah, M.D. FRCS<br />
Mohamed Gamal , M.D.<br />
Demographic data<br />
• 41 eyes <strong>of</strong> 32 patients<br />
• 21 male , 11 female<br />
• Age: average 29.4 (18-44 years)<br />
• 9 patients had bilateral surgery<br />
• 37 case kc<br />
• 2 cases post lasik ectasia<br />
• 2 cases PMD<br />
1
11/18/2012<br />
Patient selection<br />
• CL <strong>in</strong>tolerable<br />
• BSCVA : < 20/50<br />
• Pachmetry : > 400 um at 5 mm zone<br />
• Clear cornea<br />
• No collagen disorder<br />
• No ocular active disease<br />
Preoperative & postoperative<br />
exam:<br />
• UCVA<br />
• BSCVA<br />
• Manifest sphere & cyl<strong>in</strong>der refraction<br />
• Spherical equivalent<br />
• Keratometry<br />
• Corneal topography (pentacam)<br />
• Pachymetry (pentacam thickness pr<strong>of</strong>ile at 5mm zone)<br />
2
11/18/2012<br />
Preoperative data<br />
Median M<strong>in</strong> Max<br />
UCVA 20/200 Cf 2m 20/50<br />
BSCVA 20/80 20/400 20/25<br />
Spherical<br />
equivalent<br />
-6.25 -1.00 -12.00<br />
Average K 48.9 45.4 56.00<br />
K max 54.8 48.1 61.6<br />
Surgical procedure<br />
• <strong>Femto</strong> second <strong>laser</strong> FS 200 (Alcon)<br />
• Corneal tunnel:<br />
-Incision : *Length :1.0 mm<br />
*Location: steep axis<br />
-Tunnel : *Outer diameter: 6.0 mm<br />
*Inner diameter: 4.90 mm<br />
*Depth : 80 %<br />
3
11/18/2012<br />
Screen shot<br />
Surgical procedure<br />
ICR (Ferrara r<strong>in</strong>g)<br />
• Outer diameter : 6.00 mm<br />
• Inner diameter : 5.00 mm<br />
• Modified manufacture nomogram<br />
*Thickness<br />
*Arc length<br />
4
11/18/2012<br />
SL photo<br />
5
11/18/2012<br />
Change <strong>in</strong> UCVA<br />
Median Max M<strong>in</strong><br />
preoperative 20/200 20/50 Cf 2m<br />
1 week 20/60 20/25 20/200<br />
1 month 20/70 20/25 20/200<br />
6 month 20/50 20/25 20/100<br />
250<br />
200<br />
change <strong>in</strong> UCVA<br />
150<br />
100<br />
change <strong>in</strong> UCVA<br />
50<br />
0<br />
pre op 1 wk 1 month 6 month<br />
6
11/18/2012<br />
Change <strong>in</strong> BSCVA<br />
Median Max M<strong>in</strong><br />
preoperative 20/80 20/25 20/400<br />
1 week 20/40 20/25 20/100<br />
1 month 20/50 20/20 20/100<br />
6 month 20/40 20/30 20/70<br />
100<br />
change <strong>in</strong> BSCVA<br />
80<br />
60<br />
40<br />
change <strong>in</strong> BSCVA<br />
20<br />
0<br />
preop 1 wk 1 month 6 month<br />
7
11/18/2012<br />
Change <strong>in</strong> BSCVA<br />
18<br />
16<br />
14<br />
12<br />
10<br />
8<br />
6<br />
4<br />
2<br />
0<br />
1 wk 1 month 6 month<br />
dropped 2 l<strong>in</strong>es<br />
no imp<br />
ga<strong>in</strong>ed 1-2 l<strong>in</strong>es<br />
ga<strong>in</strong>ed 3-4 l<strong>in</strong>es<br />
ga<strong>in</strong>ed 5 l<strong>in</strong>es<br />
Change <strong>in</strong> spherical equivalent<br />
Median Max M<strong>in</strong><br />
preoperative -6.25 -12.00 -2<br />
1 week -1.80 -6.00 -0.50<br />
1 month -2.01 -4.50 plano<br />
6 month -2.29 -6 plano<br />
8
11/18/2012<br />
change <strong>in</strong> spherical equivalent<br />
6 month<br />
1 month<br />
1 wk<br />
change <strong>in</strong> sphericl<br />
equivelant<br />
preop<br />
-8 -6 -4 -2 0<br />
Change <strong>in</strong> average K<br />
Median Max M<strong>in</strong><br />
preoperative 48.9 D 56.00 D 45.40 D<br />
1 week 45.00 D 49.00 D 41.00 D<br />
1 month 45.80 D 49.50 D 41.00 D<br />
6 month 46.00 D 50.00 D 41.50 D<br />
9
11/18/2012<br />
50<br />
49<br />
48<br />
change <strong>in</strong> average K<br />
47<br />
46<br />
change <strong>in</strong> average K<br />
45<br />
44<br />
43<br />
preop 1 wk 1 month 6 month<br />
Change <strong>in</strong> K max<br />
Median Max M<strong>in</strong><br />
preop 54.8 61.6 48.1<br />
1 wk 50.7 56.9 46.5<br />
1 month 50.8 56.8 46.3<br />
6 month 50.9 56.9 46.2<br />
10
11/18/2012<br />
56<br />
55<br />
54<br />
53<br />
52<br />
51<br />
50<br />
49<br />
48<br />
change <strong>in</strong> K max<br />
change <strong>in</strong> K max<br />
preop<br />
6 month<br />
11
11/18/2012<br />
12
11/18/2012<br />
13
11/18/2012<br />
complications<br />
• Operative :<br />
-Epith defect<br />
-Incomplete tunnel :1 eye<br />
-Subconj hege.<br />
-No perforation<br />
• Postoperative:<br />
-Migration & extrusion : 1 eye<br />
-White deposits : 3 eyes<br />
conclusion<br />
• Safe<br />
• Effective<br />
• Improv<strong>in</strong>g VA (gls , s<strong>of</strong>t CL)<br />
• Reduce refractive errors<br />
• Delay or elim<strong>in</strong>ate the need for PKP<br />
• Reversible<br />
14
11/18/2012<br />
conclusion<br />
•<strong>Femto</strong> second Vs manual :<br />
• Better centration<br />
• Better depth<br />
• Better location<br />
• Safe : no perforation<br />
15