CSSRI Annual Report 2010-11 - Central Soil Salinity Research ...
CSSRI Annual Report 2010-11 - Central Soil Salinity Research ...
CSSRI Annual Report 2010-11 - Central Soil Salinity Research ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
okf"kZd izfrosnu<br />
<strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong><br />
<strong>2010</strong>-20<strong>11</strong><br />
<strong>Central</strong> <strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Salinity</strong> <strong>Research</strong> Institute<br />
Karnal - 132 001 INDIA
Citation<br />
<strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong>, <strong>2010</strong>-20<strong>11</strong>, <strong>Central</strong> <strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Salinity</strong> <strong>Research</strong> Institute, Karnal-132 001, India<br />
Edited by<br />
D.K. Sharma, S.K. Gupta, Randhir Singh and Pradip Dey<br />
Assistance<br />
Madan Singh<br />
Cover Photos<br />
Institute <strong>Research</strong> Activities<br />
Photography<br />
D.B. Thapa<br />
Published by<br />
Director, <strong>Central</strong> <strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Salinity</strong> <strong>Research</strong> Institute, Karnal-132 001 India<br />
Telephone : +91-184-2290501; Gram : <strong>Salinity</strong>; Fax: +91-184-2290480, 2292489<br />
Email : director@cssri.ernet.in; Website : www.cssri.org<br />
Printing<br />
Intech Printing & Publishers<br />
# 353, Ground Floor, Mugal Canal Market, Karnal-132 001<br />
Ph. 0184-4043541, 3292951, Email : jobs.ipp@gmail.com
<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
PREFACE<br />
Food and nutritional security of the ever increasing population calls for sustained productivity<br />
from the limited land and water resources, which is further thwarted by the multiplicity of resource<br />
degradation problems. Salt affected soils alone have assumed significant global dimension, as<br />
about 1000 million ha area in more than hundred countries is affected by this menace. India, with<br />
6.73 million ha of salt affected lands, suffers huge economic losses. Besides, rapid salinization and<br />
sodication of land in the irrigated landscape is inflicting unacceptable environment damages. Poor<br />
quality ground water, shrinking biological diversity and threat of the global climatic change have<br />
added new dimensions to the already complex problem of rational management of soil and water in<br />
salt affected environment. As such, we have to strive to develop technologies that are acceptable to<br />
the farmers both in economic and the environment terms.<br />
The year <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong> at <strong>CSSRI</strong> has been an eventful year, wherein we not only pursued the on-going<br />
research programmes to develop cost-effective and eco-friendly technologies but also indulged in<br />
thinking, discussing and planning new research agenda to ensure sustainable productivity in the<br />
saline environment. Some of the significant research achievements for the year relate to: development<br />
of decision support system for enhancing productivity in irrigated saline environment, utilization<br />
of bio-sludge from the fertilizer industry for vegetables production, sustainable land and water<br />
management in coastal eco-system, selection of salt-tolerant varieties of rice in Sundarbans through<br />
PPP mode and technology of direct seeded rice under reclaimed sodic soils. The resource conservation<br />
technologies being developed at the institute attracted large number of dignitaries and farmers from<br />
far and near.<br />
The newly constituted <strong>Research</strong> Advisory Committee (RAC) under the Chairmanship of<br />
Dr. Pratap Narain, Former Vice-Chancellor of Rajasthan Agricultural University and Ex-Director<br />
CAZRI, Jodhpur, met during October 22-23, <strong>2010</strong> to review the research programmes of the institute<br />
and offered very valuable suggestions for future research agenda. Some of the researchable issues<br />
identified by RAC included: development of technologies for groundwater recharge under saline<br />
environment, bio-remediation and phyto-remediation measures to manage poor quality water<br />
including waste waters, shifting the focus of multi-enterprise model to major enterprises in the context<br />
of agro-social conditions, upgradation of monitoring and evaluation activities in phased manner,<br />
reclamation and management of waterlogged sodic/saline soils and impact of climate change on<br />
crops grown in salt affected environment. The newly constituted QRT under the chairmanship of<br />
Dr. S.S. Khanna Former Advisor (Agriculture), Planning Commission, GoI, New Delhi also had its<br />
first meeting on November 4, <strong>2010</strong> in the presence of Dr. A.K. Singh DDG (NRM) at New Delhi.<br />
The second meeting was held during December 22-24, <strong>2010</strong> at <strong>CSSRI</strong>, where a comprehensive plan<br />
was prepared to complete the task in a time bound manner. Staff <strong>Research</strong> Council meeting was<br />
organized during December 6-10, <strong>2010</strong>. The progress of each project was reviewed and new research<br />
programmes formulated keeping in view the RAC recommendations.<br />
The Kharif and Rabi Kisan Melas were organized. While Dr. R. S. Paroda, Former DG, ICAR and<br />
Chairman, Haryana Kisan Aayog addressed the farmers in the Kharif Kisan Mela, Dr. N.K. Tyagi,<br />
Member, ASRB, New Delhi addressed them during the Rabi Kisan Mela. Coinciding with the Rabi<br />
mela, <strong>CSSRI</strong> organized the institute 42nd Foundation day on March 1, 20<strong>11</strong>. The foundation day<br />
lecture on “Water for Food and Environment: An Overview” was delivered by Dr. N.K.Tyagi. He<br />
also distributed the <strong>CSSRI</strong> excellence awards to the winners on this occasion. Besides, a number of<br />
workshops/training programmes were organized during the year.<br />
i
Preface <strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
We had the privileges of welcoming a number of distinguished visitors, notable amongst them<br />
being Dr. Robert S. Zeigler, Director General, IRRI, Philippines and Dr. Thomas Lumpkin, Director<br />
General, CIMMYT, Mexico. They evinced keen interest in resource conservation technologies.<br />
Dr. Paroda during his visit to the institute had a very fruitful meeting with the farmers’ representatives.<br />
We utilized the presence of key national and international visitors in showcasing our research<br />
achievements and discussing the on-going and future programmes.<br />
<strong>CSSRI</strong> in recent times was quite handicapped in conducting field experiments as salt affected lands<br />
under its control have been reclaimed. During the year, Government of Haryana approved the<br />
leasing of land by Panchayat of the Nain village near Panipat. According to the agreement, 10.45 ha of<br />
Panchayat land are leased to <strong>CSSRI</strong> for a period of 10 years.<br />
Dr. R.S. Tripathi joined as Head, Division of Technology Evaluation and Transfer. Several colleagues<br />
got promoted while several scientists, technical, administrative and supporting staff retired<br />
from service after rendering valuable service to the institute. We congratulate those promoted<br />
and wish happy and healthy retired life to the superannuated staff. Upon the superannuation of<br />
Dr. Ram Ajore, Director (A) on 30.06.<strong>2010</strong>, Dr. S.K. Gupta worked as Director (A) up to 20.10.<strong>2010</strong>. I<br />
place on record his significant contributions in the administrative and research set-up of the institute.<br />
Dr. S. Ayyappan, Secretary, DARE and DG, ICAR decided to organize the ICAR Regional Committee<br />
V Meeting and KVK’s interface meet at <strong>CSSRI</strong>, Karnal during January 10-<strong>11</strong>, 20<strong>11</strong>. The event could<br />
be successfully organized with guidance from hon’ble DG, Dr. K.M.L. Pathak, DDG (AS) and with<br />
active cooperation of the staff of the institute.<br />
The institute received a number of awards from ICAR and other organizations during the year. The<br />
institute was bestowed with the Sardar Patel Best Institute Award – 2009 by the Council. Ganesh<br />
Sankar Vidhyarthi Puruskar was also given to the institute for its publication Krishi Kiran. Ministry<br />
of Water Resource, Govt. of India awarded the institute for its outstanding research work on<br />
groundwater recharge. Individual honors were bestowed upon several scientists of the institute in<br />
the form of fellowships/gold medals. <strong>CSSRI</strong> excellence awards were also given in scientific, technical,<br />
administrative and supporting categories. I congratulate all the award winners on their achievement<br />
and wish them best for future advancement.<br />
Institute made significant impact in promoting Hindi in all its programmes. The Institute hosted the<br />
‘Rashtriya Krishi Vigyan Goshti’ to popularize research publications in Hindi. A city based workshop<br />
on Hindi was also organized during the year.<br />
The guidance and support received from Dr. S. Ayyappan, Secretary, DARE and DG, ICAR,<br />
Dr. A.K. Singh DDG (NRM) and Dr. P.S. Minhas ADG (<strong>Soil</strong>s and WM) is gratefully acknowledged.<br />
Dr. S.K. Gupta, Sh. Randhir Singh and Dr. Pradip Dey, shared the major responsibility of synthesizing,<br />
editing and getting the annual report printed. Dr. R.K. Yadav and Dr. R.L. Meena helped in Hindi<br />
translation of the executive summary. I appreciate the efforts made by them and other colleagues<br />
who provided the material for timely publication of the report.<br />
I believe that the information cited in this report would provide readers some glimpses of the <strong>CSSRI</strong><br />
achievements during the year. I would be happy to receive any suggestions/comments from readers<br />
for its improvement in future.<br />
June 30, 20<strong>11</strong><br />
<br />
D.K. Sharma<br />
Director<br />
ii
<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
CONTENTS<br />
Preface<br />
i-ii<br />
lkjka'k 1<br />
Executive Summary 8<br />
Introduction 14<br />
<strong>Research</strong> Achievements 19<br />
Database on Salt Affected <strong>Soil</strong>s 21<br />
Reclamation and Management of Alkali <strong>Soil</strong>s 26<br />
Management of Water Logging/Saline <strong>Soil</strong>s 41<br />
Management of Marginal Quality Water 53<br />
Crop Improvement for <strong>Salinity</strong>, Alkalinity and Waterlogging Stresses 57<br />
Agroforestry in Salt Affected <strong>Soil</strong>s 74<br />
Reclamation and Management of Alkali <strong>Soil</strong>s of <strong>Central</strong> and Eastern Gangatic Plains 79<br />
Reclamation and Management of Salt Affected Vertisols 89<br />
Reclamation and Management of Coastal Saline <strong>Soil</strong>s 95<br />
Aicrp on Management of Salt Affected <strong>Soil</strong>s and Use of Saline Water in Agriculture 109<br />
Technology Assessed and Transferred <strong>11</strong>7<br />
General/ Miscellaneous <strong>11</strong>9<br />
Trainings in India and Abroad 121<br />
Deputation of Scientists Abroad 123<br />
Awards and Recognitions 124<br />
Linkages and Collaborations 126<br />
List of Publications 128<br />
Participation in Conference/Seminar/Symposium/Workshops 139<br />
List of On-going Projects 141<br />
Cosultancies, Patents and Commercialisation of Technologies 146<br />
Institutional Activity 147<br />
Workshop, Seminar, Training, Foundation Day and Kisan Mela Organised 151<br />
List of Scientific, Technical and Administrative Personnel 159<br />
<strong>CSSRI</strong> Staff Position 161<br />
Weather <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong> 162<br />
Author Index 166<br />
iii
<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
lkjka’k<br />
dsUnzh; e`nk yo.krk vuqla/kku laLFkku djuky<br />
dh LFkkiuk yo.kxzLr e`nkvksa ,oa fuEu xq.koÙkk<br />
okys ty ds lq/kkj rFkk —f’k esa mi;ksx lacaf/kr<br />
vk/kkjHkwr ,oa O;ogkfjd vuqla/kku ,oa çca/ku gsrq<br />
lu~ 1969 esa dh xbZA bl fo’k; ij vuqla/kku ds<br />
fy, ;g laLFkku vUrjkZ’Vªh; Lrj ij fo[;kr ,d<br />
mR—‘V laLFkku gSA Hkkjr o’kZ esa yxHkx 6-73 fefy;u<br />
gsDVs;j {ks= yo.kxzLr gSA bu yo.kxzLr e`nkvksa<br />
dks eq[;r% nks oxksZa] {kkjh; ,oa yo.kh; esa foHkkftr<br />
fd;k x;k gSA ns”k dh fofHkUu HkkSxksfyd ifjfLFkfr;ksa<br />
esa yo.kxzLr e`nkvksa ds lq/kkj ,oa izca/ku rFkk fuEu<br />
xq.koÙkk ty ds —f’k esa mi;ksx laca/kh ykHknk;d<br />
rduhd fodflr djus esa dsUnzh; e`nk yo.krk<br />
vuqla/kku laLFkku dk fo”ks’k ;ksxnku jgk gSA catj<br />
tehu ds ekfyd xjhc fdlkuksa dh vkthfodk<br />
lqj{kk ,oa thou Lrj lq/kkj ds jk’Vªh; tukns”k<br />
ds vuq:Ik dsUnzh; e`nk yo.krk vuqla/kku laLFkku<br />
us vfr egRoiw.kZ dk;Z fd;k gSA uohure vuqeku<br />
ds vuqlkj laLFkku ds iz;klksa ls lq/kkjh xbZ 1-85<br />
fefy;u gsDVs;j catj Hkwfe ls ns”k ds dsUnzh;<br />
[kk|kUu HkaMkj esa yxHkx 15 fefy;u Vu vfrfjDr<br />
[kk|kUu dh iwfrZ gksrh gSA laLFkku ds pkj izeq[k<br />
izHkkxksa }kjk cgqfo’k;d vuqla/kku dk;ZØe lapkfyr<br />
gksrs gSaA e`nk ,oa Qly izcU/ku izHkkx ds çeq[k<br />
dk;ZØeksa esa HkwlosZ{k.k ,oa vko”;d iz;ksx”kkyk<br />
ifj{k.kksa }kjk yo.kxzLr Hkwfe;ksa ds vkadM+s<br />
,d= djuk] ftIle }kjk lq/kkjh xbZ e`nkvksa ds<br />
izca/ku gsrq leqfpr rduhd fodflr djuk]<br />
lalk/ku laj{k.k rduhd dk bu e`nkvksa ds izca/ku<br />
gsrq leqfpr fodkl djuk] fuEu xq.koÙkk ty ds<br />
—f’k esa mi;ksx ds fy, mfpr rduhd fodflr<br />
djus] miyC/k ikuh ds cgqmÌs”kh; —f’k ds fofHkUu<br />
?kVdksa esa leqfpr mi;ksx laca/kh rduhd dk<br />
fodkl djuk rFkk bu ifjfLFkfr;ksa ds fy, mfpr<br />
—f’k&okfudh] —f’k&ckxokuh o tSfod mipkj<br />
vkfn gSaaA flapkbZ ,oa tyfudkl vfHk;kaf=dh izHkkx<br />
esa tykØkUr yo.kxzLr e`nk lq/kkj ,oa izcU/k] ty<br />
fudkl dh o`gn ifj;kstukvksa dh fuxjkuh ,oa<br />
ewY;kadu] yo.kksa vkSj ty larqyu ds {ks=h; ekWMy<br />
cukus ,oa mudk mi;ksx] uydwi ty xq.koÙkk dh<br />
fuxjkuh vkSj Hkwty iquHkZj.k rduhd laca/kh “kks/k<br />
dk;ZØe pyk, tkrs gSaA Qly lq/kkj izHkkx esa /kku]<br />
xsg¡w vkSj ljlksa dh vf/kd mit nsus okyh yo.k]<br />
{kkj ,oa tyeXurk jks/kh ;k lgu”khy thu:iksa<br />
dk ijEijkxr ,oa nwljh uohure rduhdksa<br />
tSls eksfyD;wyj] ikni Økf;Zdh ,oa vkuqokaf”kd<br />
vfHk;kaf=dh vkfn }kjk fodkl laca/kh “kks/k dk;Z<br />
fd;k tkrk gSA rduhd ewY;kadu ,oa çlkj izHkkx<br />
dk dk;Z laLFkku }kjk fodflr rduhdksa dk<br />
fdlkuksa rFkk vke tu ds thou;kiu] vkthfodk<br />
lqj{kk] jkstxkj l`tu ,oa] xjhch mUewyu vkfn ij<br />
izHkko dk ewY;kadu dj rnksijkUr bu rduhdksa<br />
ds ckjs esa jk; dks laLFkku ds laKku esa ykuk gSA<br />
fofHkUu HkkSxksfyd ifjfLFkfr;ksa dh yo.kxzLr e`nkvksa<br />
rFkk fuEu xq.koÙkk ty laca/kh fo”ks’k leL;kvksa ds<br />
lek/kku dh fn”kk esa dk;ZØeksa ds fy, laLFkku<br />
us rhu {ks=h; vuqla/kku dsUnz LFkkfir fd;s gSaA<br />
leqnzrVh; yo.krk izcU/ku gsrq dsfuax VkÅu ¼if”pe<br />
caxky½] yo.kxzLr oVhZlksy e`nk izcU/ku “kks/k ds<br />
fy, Hk#p ¼xqtjkr½ rFkk fla/kqxaxk ds e/; {ks= dh<br />
ÅFkys Hkwty ifjfLFkfr okyh yo.k izHkkfor e`nk<br />
izcU/ku ij “kks/k ds fy, y[kuÅ ¼mÙkj izns”k½ esa<br />
;g {ks=h; dsUnz LFkkfir fd;s x,s gSaA yo.kxzLr<br />
e`nkvksa vkSj [kkjs ikuh dk —f’k esa mi;ksx lacU/kh<br />
,d vf[ky Hkkjrh; lefUor ifj;kstuk Hkh laLFkku<br />
ds eq[;ky; esa fLFkr gSA bl ifj;kstuk ds vUrZxr<br />
iwjs ns”k ds fofHkUu —f’k ikfjfLFkfrdh {ks=ksa esa vkB<br />
dsUnz] vkxjk ¼mÙkj çns”k½] ckiVyk ¼vkU/kz çns”k½]<br />
chdkusj ¼jktLFkku½] xaxkoVh ¼dukZVd½] fglkj<br />
¼gfj;k.k½] bankSj ¼e/; çns”k½] dkuiqj ¼mÙkj çns”k½<br />
vkSj f=pqjkiYyh ¼rfeyukMw½ esa dk;Zjr gSaA laLFkku<br />
dh o’kZ <strong>2010</strong>&<strong>11</strong> dh izeq[k miyfC/k;ksa dk laf{kIr<br />
fooj.k fuEukuqlkj gSA<br />
/kku&xsgw¡ Qly i¼fr esa lalk/ku laj{k.k rduhsd<br />
fla/kq&xaxk ds eSnkuh {ks=ksa dh gYds xBu<br />
okyh e`nkvksa esa yxkrkj /kku&xsgw¡ Qly pØ<br />
viukus ds dkj.k çk—frd lalk/kuksa ij foifjr<br />
çHkko gqvk gSA /kku&xsgw¡ Qly iz.kkyh dh<br />
mit c
lkjka’k<br />
<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
de tqrkbZ rFkk /kku ds vo”ks’k [ksr esa feykus<br />
ds mijkUr dh xbZ gksA tcfd “kwU; tqrkbZ okys<br />
[ksrksa esa xsgw¡ dh iSnkokj ¼5-54 Vu@gsDVs;j½ nwljs<br />
LFkku ij jghA Qly vo”ks’kksa dks [ksr esa feykus<br />
ls xsgw¡ dh iSnkokj esa 7 izfr”kr c
<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
lkjka’k<br />
[kkjfp;k esa tyeXurk ds izfr vPNh lgu”khyrk<br />
ntZ dh xbZA Hkkjrh; ,oa vkLVªsfy;k dh xsgw¡<br />
iztkfr;ksa esa tyeXurk ds izfr {kkjh; e`nk esa dkQh<br />
fHkUurk ikbZ xbZA v/;;u ds nkSjku ik;k x;k<br />
fd ihchMCyw 525@dsvkj,y 99 esa tyeXurk ,oa<br />
jrqvk chekjh ds izfr dkQh lgu”khyrk gS rFkk bu<br />
ij xgu v/;;u dh vko”;drk gSA<br />
ukbVªks&bVhih bdkbZ ls fu"dkflr tSfod Lyt ,oa<br />
mipkfjr vif'k"V dk ofVZlksy esa Qly mRiknu gsrq<br />
mi;ksx<br />
i;kZoj.k iznw’k.k ,d eq[; leL;k gS tksfd Rofjr<br />
vkS|ksfxdhdj.k] “kgjhdj.k rFkk thou “kSyh esa<br />
cnyko ds lkFk tqM+h gqbZ gSA vkS|ksfxdhdj.k ls<br />
mRiUu Bksl ,oa rjy vo”ks’k Hkh i;kZoj.k çnw’k.k<br />
ls tqM+h gqbZ gkfudkjd leL;kvksa dk dkj.k gSA<br />
xqtjkr ueZnk oSyh QfVZykbTkj dEiuh] Hk:p dh<br />
ukbVªks&bVhih bdkbZ ls mRiUu tSfod Lyt dk<br />
Qly o`f) ,oa e`nk xq.kksa ij tSfod [kknksa ds<br />
lkFk rqyukRed izHkko dk v/;;u djus ds fy,<br />
laHkkoukvksa dh ryk”k dj mudh O;ogkfjdrk dh<br />
igpku djus ds iz;kl fd;s x;sA yksfc;k] Xokj]<br />
vejaFkl] fHkaMh ds Åij tSfod Lyt vdsys ,oa<br />
tSfod [kknksa tSls xkscj dh [kkn ,oa dsapqvk [kkn<br />
ds lkFk mi;ksx djus ij izHkko tkapus ds fy,<br />
iz{ks= iz;ksx yxk;s x;sA ifj.kkeksa ls ;g Kkr<br />
gqvk gS fd tSfod Lyt esa eq[; iks’kd rRoksa tSls<br />
u=tu] QkLQksjl bR;kfn dh mifLFkfr ls dkj.k<br />
;g ,d vkn”kZ oSdfYid iks’kd rRo lzksr gS tks<br />
fd Qly dh vkaf”kd iks’kd rRoksa dh t:jrksa dks<br />
iwjk djrh gSA v/;;u ls ;g fu’d’kZ fudyrk gS<br />
fd tSfod Lyt dk mi;ksx e`nk xq.kksa dks c
lkjka’k<br />
<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
izfr”kr½ cgqr gh de ik;h x;hA mPp Hkwfe n”kkvksa<br />
eas o`{kksa dh Å¡pkbZ ,oa rus dk O;kl loksZre ik;k<br />
x;k rFkk ;g fuEu Hkwfe n”kkvksa ls ges”kk vf/kd<br />
jgkA<br />
caxky ds rVh; izns'k ds xjhc Ï"kdksa ds fy;s yo.k<br />
lgu'khy pkoy<br />
[kjhQ ekSle esa rVh; izns”k dh yo.k lgu”khy<br />
pkoy dh fdLeksa dk pquko izHkkoh rjhds ls fd;k<br />
x;k] ftlesa fdlkuksa] efgyk [ksfrgkjkas o oSKkfudksa<br />
dks lfEefyr fd;k x;kA fdlkuksa us fdLeksa ds<br />
pquko esa egÙoiw.kZ ;ksxnku n”kkZ;kA fdLeksa dk<br />
pquko dsoy mit dkjd ds vk/kkj ij gh ugha<br />
fd;k x;k] blesa vU; dbZ dkjd tSls&nkus dk<br />
izdkj] mldh xq.koÙkk] vof/k] ck;ksekl mRiknu<br />
o ikni yEckbZ vkfn Hkh lfEefyr Fks] ftUgksaus<br />
pkoy dh fdLeksa ds pquko dks izHkkfor fd;kA<br />
lqUnj ou {ks= esa izfrHkkxh fdLeksa dk pquko fofHkUu<br />
LFkkuksa ¼dsfuax] pkUn[kyh] fudkjh?kkV] fueihFk o<br />
dksbZ[kyh½ ij fd;k x;kA fo”ys’k.k ls ;g Kkr gqvk<br />
fd [kjhQ esa lh,lvkjlh ¼,l½ 21&2&5&ch&1&1<br />
o xhrktayh rFkk jch esa fc/kku&2 o dsfuad&7<br />
lokZf/kd izkFkfedrk okyh pkoy dh fdLesa FkhA<br />
lq/kjh {kkjh; e`nkvksa esa thjks fVyst rduhd ds vkfFkZd<br />
izHkko<br />
Ñf’k tqrkbZ dh ykxr dks de djus o izkÑfrd<br />
lalk/kuksa tSls ty o e`nk dh mRikndrk dks fLFkj<br />
cuk;s j[kus esa laHkor% thjks fVyst rduhd ,d<br />
mÙke rjhdksa esa ls gSA blds dbZ ykHk gS tSls ykxr<br />
de djuk] mit dks fLFkj cuk;s j[kuk] ykHk c
<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
lkjka’k<br />
ikfjfLFkfrdh ds orZeku ifjn`”;½ ij ,d jk’Vªh;<br />
laxks’Bh dk vk;kstu dsysaxsVh] xksvk esa fd;k<br />
x;k<br />
• lesfdr ty çca/ku ,oa fuEu xq.koŸkk ty dk<br />
—f’k esa mi;ksx ij 23 ls 30 uoEcj <strong>2010</strong> ds<br />
nkSjku ,d vkB fnolh; ekWMy çf”k{k.k dk;ZØe<br />
dk vk;kstu fd;k x;k ftlesa 10 jkT;ksa ds 21<br />
vf/kdkfj;ksa us Hkkx fy;k<br />
• —f’k esa fuEu xq.koŸkk ty ds mi;ksx ij 1<br />
ls 14 fnlEcj <strong>2010</strong> ds nkSjku vÝks&,f”k;u<br />
xzkeh.k fodkl ea=ky; ¼,,vkjMhvks½ ds lnL;<br />
ns”kksa ds çfrHkkfx;ksa ds fy, ,d vUrjkZ’Vªh;<br />
çf”k{k.k dk;ZØe dk vk;kstu fd;k x;kA blesa<br />
eysf”k;k] ;eu] lhfj;k] bjkd] vkseku] ekWjhll<br />
,oa ckaXykns”k ds lkr çfrHkkfx;ksa us Hkkx fy;k<br />
• fnlEcj 28] <strong>2010</strong> dks ikni fdLeksa ds cpko<br />
,oa fdlkuks ds vf/kdkj ij ,d fdlku çf”k{k.k<br />
,oa tkx:drk dk;ZØe dk vk;kstu fd;k x;k<br />
ftlesa yxHkx 100 fdlkuksa ,oa oSKkfudksa us<br />
Hkkx fy;kA\<br />
• ekpZ 1] 20<strong>11</strong> dks laLFkku dk 42ok¡ LFkkiuk<br />
fnol euk;k x;kA bl fnol ij Ñf’k oSKkfud<br />
p;u eaM+y ds lnL; MkWñ ,u- ds- R;kxh eq[;<br />
vfrfFk ds :Ik esa mifLFkr jgs rFkk LFkkiuk<br />
Hkk’k.k fn;k<br />
[ksr izn'kZfu;k¡ vkSj Hkze.k<br />
yo.kxzLr e`nkvksa dk lq/kkj rFkk —f’k esa [kkjs ikuh<br />
dk mi;ksx ds lacaf/kr {ks=ksa esa 7 [ksr izn”kZfu;k¡<br />
yxkbZ xbZA bu izn”kZfu;ksa esa fdlkuksa rFkk foLrkj<br />
fo”ks’kKksa us çn”kZu LVkYl dk Hkze.k fd;k rFkk<br />
laLFkku }kjk fodflr rduhfd;ksa ls çHkkfor gq;sA<br />
o’kZ ds nkSjku laLFkku esa ns”k rFkk fons”k ls 716<br />
fdlku 7 nyksa esa] 82 foLrkj dk;ZdrkZ 10 nyksa<br />
esa] 489 —f’k Lukrd f”k{kkFkhZ 7 nyksa esa rFkk 10<br />
oSKkfud 2 nyksa esa Hkkjr ,oa fons”k ls laLFkku dk<br />
Hkze.k fd;kA<br />
Hkkxhnkj fdlkuksa (LVsdgkWYMlZ) ds fy, ijke'kZ<br />
lsok,¡<br />
laLFkku }kjk ,d fu%”kqYd nqjHkk’k ¼18001801014½<br />
lsok dk lapkyu fd;k tk jgk gS ftlesa yo.kh;<br />
,oa {kkjh; e`nkvksa ds lq/kkj ,oa çca/ku] fuEu<br />
xq.koŸkk ty mi;ksx rFkk fofHkUu Qlyksa dh yo.k<br />
lgu”khy çtkfr;ksa ds ckjs esa fdlku dh leL;kvksa<br />
dk lek/kku nwjHkk’k ds ek/;e ls oSKkfudksa }kjk<br />
fn;s tkrs gSaA<br />
jk"Vªh; ,oa varjkZ"Vªh; lgHkkxh ifj;kstuk;sa<br />
eq[; laLFkku djuky esa lgHkkxh dk;ZØe<br />
varjkZ"Vªh; lg;ksx<br />
• ck;kslsQksj ck;kslSykbu ¼—f’k½ okfudh% yo.kh;<br />
ijrh tehu dk uohuh—r ÅtkZ] tSo inkFkZ vkSj<br />
pkjs ds mRiknu }kjk funkuA ¼;wjksfi;u ;wfu;u<br />
}kjk izk;ksftr½<br />
• /kku dh vtSfod ncko lgu”khy çtkfr;ksa dk<br />
eq[; D;w Vh ,y ds lkFk lq[kk tyeXurk<br />
,oa yo.k lgu”khy çtkfr;ksa dk ekjdj<br />
¼Marker½ dh lgk;rk ls çtuuA ¼foKku ,oa<br />
çkS|ksfxdh foHkkx] ubZ fnYyh&vkbZvkjvkjvkbZ<br />
}kjk izk;ksftr½<br />
• vÝhdk vkSj nf{k.k ,f”k;k ds xjhc fdlkuksa ds<br />
fy, lgu”khy /kku ¼vkbZvkjvkjvkbZ&ch,eth,Q<br />
}kjk izk;ksftr½<br />
• yo.kxzLr {ks=ksa esa /kku dh mit c
lkjka’k<br />
<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
rFkk ewY;kadu ¼gfj;k.kk vkWijs”kuy ik;yV<br />
çkstsDV] —f’k foHkkx] gfj;k.kk }kjk foÙkiksf’kr½<br />
• yo.k lgu”khy Vªkaltsfud /kku dk fodkl<br />
rFkk ewY;kadu ¼ck;ks çks|kSfxdh foHkkx }kjk<br />
foÙkiksf’kr½<br />
• mÙkj if”peh Hkkjr esa Hkwfexr ty iquHkZj.k rFkk<br />
ty mRikndrk c
<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
lkjka’k<br />
esa fHkUu Qlyksa ds mRiknu gsrq mi;ksx dh<br />
O;ogkfjdrk dk v/;;u<br />
ijke'kZ lsok,sa rFkk vuqcU/kkRed vuqla/kku<br />
bl vof/k ds nkSjku laLFkku ds oSKkfudksa us<br />
v/kksfyf[kr ijke”kZ lsok,a lapkfyr dhA<br />
• egkjk’Vª dh Hkkjh e`nkvksa ds fy, lrgh ty<br />
fudkl% lh,l,lvkjvkbZ] djuky&jSDl&ikSyh<br />
,DlVªwlu izkbosV fyfeVsM lkaxyh] egkjk’Vª dk<br />
vuqca/k<br />
• th,u,Qlh dh i;kZoj.k fu;a=.k bdkbZ ls<br />
fu’dkflr mipkfjr vif”k’V rFkk ukbVªks&bVhih<br />
bdkbZ ls fu’dkflr ck;ksyksftdy Lyt dk<br />
ofVZlksy esa Qly mRiknu gsrq mi;ksx dh<br />
O;ogkfjdrk dk v/;;u % lh,l,lvkjvkbZ<br />
{ks=h; vuqla/kku dsUnz Hk:p&xqtjkr ueZnk oSyh<br />
QfVZykbtj dkWijsfVo fyfeVsM+ ueZnk] Hk:p]<br />
xqtjkr dk vuqca/k<br />
• th,u,Qlh dh ,fuyhu&VhMhvkbZ bdkbZ ls<br />
fu’dkflr mipkfjr vif”k’V dk ofVZlksy<br />
esa fHkUu Qlyksa ds mRiknu gsrq mi;ksx dh<br />
O;ogkfjdrk dk v/;;u % lh,l,lvkjvkbZ<br />
{ks=h; vuqla/kku dsUnz Hk:p&xqtjkr ueZnk oSyh<br />
QfVZykbtj dkWijsfVo fyfeVsM+ ueZnk] Hk:p]<br />
xqtjkr dk vuqca/k<br />
izdk'ku<br />
laLFkku ds oSKkfud }kjk mPp Lrjh; tuyZl esa<br />
40 vuqla/kku ys[k 35 cqd pSiVlZ] 4 iqLrdsa] 9<br />
cqysfVu@QksYMlZ ,oa 31 iksiwyj vkfVZdy izdkf”kr<br />
fd, x,A blds vykok 47 ys[k fofHkUu laxksf’B;k¡<br />
esa çLrqr fd, x,A<br />
oSKkfudksa ds varjkZ"Vªh; nkSjs@lsok fuo`fr vkSj<br />
dk;Zxzg.k<br />
Kkuo/kZu vkSj dk;Zdq”kyrk c
<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY<br />
<strong>Central</strong> <strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Salinity</strong> <strong>Research</strong> Institute (<strong>CSSRI</strong>),<br />
Karnal, established in 1969, is a premier research<br />
institute of international status involved in<br />
conducting basic and applied researches on the<br />
reclamation and management of salt affected<br />
soils and use of poor quality water in agriculture.<br />
Nearly 6.73 million hectare soils in India are salt<br />
affected and categorised into two broad groups:<br />
alkali and saline soils. <strong>CSSRI</strong> has played a vital<br />
role in developing viable technologies for the<br />
amelioration of saline and alkali soils and use of<br />
poor quality irrigation water in different agroecological<br />
regions of the country. With a national<br />
mandate, the institute has played a crucial role in<br />
improving the livelihood security of millions of<br />
resource poor farmers owning degraded lands.<br />
Recent estimates indicate that more than 1.85<br />
million ha salt affected area has been reclaimed<br />
which is contributing about 15 million tonnes<br />
additional food grains to the central pool. Multidisciplinary<br />
research programmes at the main<br />
institute are conducted through four divisions.<br />
The major activities of the Division of <strong>Soil</strong> and<br />
Crop Management (DSCM) comprise of the<br />
collection and compilation of database on salt<br />
affected soils with adequate laboratory and<br />
field work; development of technologies for the<br />
optimal management of gypsum amended alkali<br />
soils; development of resource conservation<br />
technologies for reclaimed alkali soils; use of<br />
saline and other poor quality water for crop<br />
production, multiple use of water for multienterprize<br />
agriculture and development and<br />
promotion of agro-forestry systems in saline and<br />
alkali soils besides phyto and bioremediation<br />
approaches for salt affected soils and waters.<br />
Division of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering<br />
(DIDE) is addressing the issues relating to<br />
reclamation and management of waterlogged<br />
saline soils, monitoring and evaluation of<br />
large scale drainage projects, development and<br />
application of regional salt and water balance<br />
models, monitoring water quality of tube wells<br />
and development of technologies for ground<br />
water recharge. Division of Crop Improvement<br />
(DCI) focusses on the development of high<br />
yielding genotypes of rice, wheat and mustard<br />
tolerant to salinity, alkalinity and waterlogging<br />
stresses following conventional as well as<br />
modern molecular, physiological and genetic<br />
engineering approaches. The Division of<br />
Technology Evaluation and Transfer (DTET) is<br />
involved in providing feedback on the scope,<br />
limitations and constraints and impact analyses<br />
of institute technologies in terms of livelihood<br />
security, employment generation and poverty<br />
alleviation. To address the specific research<br />
needs of different agro-climatic regions, the<br />
institute has three Regional <strong>Research</strong> Stations<br />
at Canning Town (West Bangal), Bharuch<br />
(Gujarat) and Lucknow (Uttar Pradesh) to<br />
deal with the problems of coastal salinity, salt<br />
affected vertisols and alkali soils of the central<br />
and eastern Indo-Gangetic plains with high<br />
water table, respectively. The Coordinating Unit<br />
of AICRP on Management of Salt Affected <strong>Soil</strong>s<br />
and Use of Saline Water in Agriculture is also<br />
located at the main institute and is functioning<br />
through eight research centres at Agra (Uttar<br />
Pradesh), Baptala (Andhra Pradesh), Bikaner<br />
(Rajasthan), Gangawati (Karnataka), Hisar<br />
(Haryana), Indore (Madhya Pradesh), Kanpur<br />
(Uttar Pradesh) and Tiruchirapalli (Tamil Nadu)<br />
representing different agro-ecological regions of<br />
the country. Significant research achievements<br />
of the institute during <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong> are summarised<br />
below:<br />
Evaluation of resource conservation<br />
technologies in rice–wheat cropping system<br />
In the Indo-Gangetic plains, continuous ricewheat<br />
cropping sequence in light textured soils<br />
has weakened the natural resources. A long-term<br />
experiment was initiated to address some of the<br />
problems faced by the farmers in managing the<br />
natural resources for increasing the rice-wheat<br />
productivity. In rabi, the maximum yield of<br />
wheat was recorded when wheat was sown in<br />
reduced tillage with rice residue incorporation<br />
(5.58 t ha -1 ) followed by zero tillage (5.54 t ha -1 ).<br />
Residual effects of crop residue incorporation<br />
increased the wheat grain yield by 7.0 per cent<br />
8
<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
Executive summary<br />
in conventional wheat sowing and 6.0 per cent<br />
under reduced tillage cultivation. Sowing of<br />
wheat in zero tillage in rice residue increased<br />
the grain yields by 8.0 per cent in comparison to<br />
wheat in zero tillage without residue. The results<br />
revealed that crop residue incorporation or<br />
retention increased the grain yields by improving<br />
the soil health. During kharif season, the yield of<br />
rice (cv.Ariz 6179) ranged from 5.5 to 8.6 t ha -1<br />
in different treatments. The maximum yield was<br />
obtained in conventional rice transplanting after<br />
sesbania green manuring (8.6 t ha -1 ) followed by<br />
conventional transplanting with wheat residue<br />
incorporation (8.2 t ha -1 ). The maximum water<br />
productivity was obtained in conventional rice<br />
transplanting after sesbania green manuring (0.59<br />
kg m -3 ). Maximum water saving of applied water<br />
was recorded in direct seeded rice + sesbania (34.0<br />
%) followed by direct seeded rice in different<br />
treatments (29.0 %). The water saving in raised<br />
bed transplanting was 21.0 per cent.<br />
Efficient use of organic waste material as<br />
mulching in maize-wheat cropping system in<br />
reclaimed sodic soils<br />
Performance of maize-wheat was evaluated<br />
under various planting methods and mulching<br />
with different waste materials. Planting method<br />
did not have any effect on grain and straw yield<br />
of wheat and maize crops. The productivity<br />
of maize-wheat system was almost same (8.10<br />
t ha -1 ) under flat and bed planting methods but<br />
bed planting saved 24 per cent irrigation water<br />
over flat planting. The grain yield of wheat was<br />
significantly higher when mulching was done<br />
with Jatropha (4.48 t ha -1 ) over no mulching (4.05 t<br />
ha -1 ). In the case of maize, mulching with brassica<br />
(4.18 t ha -1 ), sesbania (4.12 t ha -1 ) and Jatropha<br />
(4.05 t ha -1 ) produced significantly higher grain<br />
yield over no mulching (3.47 t ha -1 ). Mulching<br />
registered higher water productivity than no<br />
mulching in maize-wheat cropping system.<br />
Microbial bioremediation of wastewater for<br />
heavy metals<br />
Biomass of microbes acts as adsorbent to<br />
remove heavy metals from wastewater. The<br />
ability to remove heavy metals from wastewater<br />
varies greatly among microbes. Trichoderma<br />
longibrachiatum showed higher Pb (80.50%)<br />
removal capacity at 3 per cent inoculum size and<br />
Cd (89.85%) and Ni (59.20%) removal capacity<br />
at 2 per cent inoculum size. Bacilus cereus<br />
showed higher Pb (55.90%) and Ni (40.75%)<br />
removal capacity at 2.5 per cent inoculum size.<br />
Bacilus sp. showed higher Cd (39.60%) removal<br />
capacity at 0.5 per cent inoculum size from<br />
nutrient broth containing 20 ppm of Cd. There<br />
was higher removal of Cr, Cu and Ni from<br />
industrial effluents by microbial consortium in<br />
combination with press mud.<br />
Effect of water and salinity stress on the<br />
performance of tree species<br />
<strong>Soil</strong> pH, water quality and irrigation schedules<br />
did not influence the height, collar diameter<br />
and total biomass of different tree species viz;<br />
Prosopis alba, Prosopis juliflora, Acacia nilotica,<br />
Tamarix articulata, and Eucalyptus significantly<br />
upto first six months. Thereafter, these growth<br />
parameters varied significantly. After one<br />
year of growth and development, irrigation<br />
scheduled at IW/CPE ratio 1.0 and above<br />
gave significantly higher collar diameter, total<br />
biomass and height of different trees. Irrigation<br />
with normal water recorded better growth<br />
and developmental parameters as compared<br />
to irrigation with saline water of 5 dS m -1 . No<br />
significant differences were noticed in soil<br />
organic carbon, NO 3<br />
-N and NH 4<br />
-N status of<br />
the soils growing these trees. Growth and<br />
development of Eucalyptus was influenced by<br />
irrigation schedules and not by the water quality.<br />
While predicting the salt dynamics through the<br />
soil profiles, it was observed that the Gapon’s<br />
selectivity coefficient performs far much better<br />
than the other approaches in establishing the<br />
ESR-SAR relationships through the soils of<br />
varying pH and compositions. For predicting<br />
the sodium dynamics through the soils columns<br />
conceptual layer model performed better than<br />
the mechanistic model.<br />
Wheat improvement for waterlogging, salinity<br />
and element toxicities<br />
Waterlogging reduces the grain yield and<br />
biomass in sodic soils. However, there was<br />
9
Executive summary <strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
differential response of waterlogging with<br />
respect to different genotypes. The genotypes<br />
KRL 3-4, KRL 99 and Kharchia 65 showed good<br />
waterlogging tolerance in microplots as well<br />
as under field conditions. Among Indian and<br />
Australian genotypes, a lot of variability was<br />
observed with respect to waterlogging tolerance<br />
in sodic soils. Out of the three populations<br />
studied in sodic soils, the performance of<br />
PBW 525/KRL 99 was the best with respect to<br />
phenotypic performance under waterlogging<br />
and resistance to rusts. This population will be<br />
advanced further as per modified sub surface<br />
drainage protocol.<br />
Using biological sludge from Nitro-ETP plant<br />
and treated effluent for crop production on<br />
vertisols<br />
Environmental pollution is the major problem<br />
associated with rapid industrialisation,<br />
urbanisation and changing life styles.<br />
Industrialisation also causes serious problems<br />
relating to environmental pollution by<br />
producing solid/liquid wastes. An attempt has<br />
been made to explore and identify the feasibility<br />
of using biological sludge generated from<br />
Nitro-ETP plant of Gujarat Narmada Valley<br />
Fertilizer Company, Bharuch in comparison<br />
to organic manures (OM) and their effect on<br />
crop performance and soil properties. Field<br />
experiments were conducted with cowpea,<br />
cluster bean, Amaranthus and okra to ascertain<br />
the response of biological sludge alone and in<br />
combination with organic manures viz; farm<br />
yard manure (FYM) and vermi compost (VC).<br />
The results showed that the biological sludge<br />
due to the presence of important nutrients like<br />
nitrogen, phosphorus etc. form ideal alternative<br />
nutrient source that meet the partial nutrient<br />
requirement of the crops. The studies revealed<br />
that the use of biological sludge helped in<br />
improving the soil properties.<br />
Use of available brackish and fresh water in<br />
the coastal areas for integrated cultivation of<br />
crops and fishes<br />
A study was undertaken to increase the crop<br />
productivity and cropping intensity in the<br />
coastal area through rainwater harvesting and<br />
integrated crop-fish cultivation by utilizing<br />
natural water resources. For this purpose, an<br />
area of 2 ha at <strong>CSSRI</strong>, RRS, Canning town farm<br />
was reshaped into five different land shaping<br />
models namely Paddy-cum-fish (PCF), PCFbrackishwater<br />
fishery, Farm pond, Deep ridge<br />
and furrow, Shallow furrow and medium ridge.<br />
Based on the experiments conducted during<br />
2009-10, economics of various land shaping<br />
models were calculated and the farm pond<br />
model emerged as the most profitable land<br />
shaping model with highest Benefit-Cost ratio<br />
of 2.33 followed by paddy-cum-fish, deep ridge<br />
and furrow ridge, shallow furrow and medium<br />
ridge and paddy-cum-brackish water fish. All<br />
the land shaping models generated higher net<br />
returns over the control. Integrated crop-fish<br />
cultivation through land shaping has substantial<br />
scope in coastal agriculture. Besides, increasing<br />
productivity of land and water, It increases<br />
income of the farmers, provided irrigation<br />
facility, resulted in reduction of salinity buildup<br />
in soil and improved drainage condition.<br />
Effect of waterlogging on tree species for agroforestry<br />
system in coastal salt affected soils<br />
Diversification of agriculture through<br />
introduction of agroforestry systems in lowlying<br />
salt affected areas may enhance the farm<br />
income vis-a-vis livelihood security of the<br />
farming communities of the coastal region.<br />
However, growing of tree species in most of the<br />
coastal land is quite impossible as it remains<br />
waterlogged for 5 months during monsoon and<br />
post-monsoon periods. Therefore, for growing<br />
tree species, low-lying land was reshaped<br />
to different heights under this experiment.<br />
Seven tree species viz; Eucalyptus sp., Acacia<br />
auriculiformis, Casuarina sp., Syzygium cumini,<br />
Heritiera fomes, Brugeria gymnorhiza and<br />
Xylocarpus mekongensis were evaluated for<br />
their suitability under 4 waterlogged situations<br />
(during Kharif ) viz; lowland (upto 50 cm<br />
waterlogging), medium lowland (upto 25 cm<br />
waterlogging), medium upland (5 cm above<br />
water level) and upland (35 cm above water<br />
level). Waterlogging during kharif season affected<br />
the growth of all the tree species evaluated.<br />
However, Syzygium, Casuarina, Heritieria and<br />
Xylocarpus survived initially but died gradually<br />
up to 4 th year of experiment under low land<br />
10
<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
Executive summary<br />
situation where continuous waterlogging<br />
prevailed throughout the kharif season. Though<br />
Acacia, Eucalyptus and Brugeria survived even in<br />
5 th year of experimentation, their survival rate<br />
was very low (20-30%). The height and diameter<br />
of these tree species increased gradually from<br />
low land to upland situations, the highest being<br />
in upland situation.<br />
Stress tolerant rice for poor farmers in coastal<br />
region of West Bangal<br />
Selection of salt tolerant rice varieties in<br />
kharif season in coastal region was conducted<br />
under participatory mode involving farmers,<br />
farm women and scientists. Farmers showed<br />
considerable wisdom in selection of varieties.<br />
Choice of varieties was not driven by the yield<br />
factor alone. Several other factors such as grain<br />
type and quality, duration, straw yield and<br />
plant height were also major factors influencing<br />
selection of the rice varieties. Participatory<br />
Varietal Selection was conducted at different<br />
locations (Canning, Chandkhali, Nikarighata,<br />
Nimpith and Koikhali) in Sundarbans region.<br />
From the analysis, it was found that the most<br />
preferred rice varieties were CSRC (S) 21-2-5-<br />
B-1-1 and Gitanjali in kharif and Bidhan-2 and<br />
Canning 7 in rabi season.<br />
Economic impact of zero tillage technology in<br />
reclaimed sodic soils<br />
Zero tillage technology is probably one of the<br />
best ways to reduce the cost of cultivation and<br />
sustaining productivity of natural resources like<br />
soil and water. It reduces input cost, sustains<br />
yield, enhances profitability, improves soil<br />
nutrients and offers benefits of retained surface<br />
residues and reduced soil and water losses.<br />
Results of the study, based on zero tillage<br />
practice adopted at <strong>CSSRI</strong> farm during the<br />
year 2009-10 for <strong>11</strong> crops, indicated that on an<br />
average there was 40% saving of human labour,<br />
60 % saving of machine power, 25 % saving<br />
of irrigation water in zero as compared to<br />
conventional tillage. On an average, there was<br />
30 per cent reduction in the cost of cultivation<br />
under zero tillage as compared to conventional<br />
method of crop production.<br />
Awards and recognition<br />
• The Indian Council of Agricultural <strong>Research</strong><br />
(ICAR) has bestowed its prestigious Sadar<br />
Patel Best Institute Award -2009 to the<br />
Institute<br />
• The Indian Council of Agricultural <strong>Research</strong><br />
(ICAR) has bestowed its prestigious Ganesh<br />
Sankar Vidhyarthi Hindi Krishi Patrika<br />
Pursakar–2009 to the magazine Krishi Kiran<br />
(Vol. 3) published by <strong>CSSRI</strong>, Karnal<br />
• The Institute has been bestowed with the<br />
National Groundwater Augmentation Award<br />
(20<strong>11</strong>) on Enhancement of Groundwater<br />
Recharge and Water Productivity in<br />
North West India by the Ministry of Water<br />
Resources (Govt. of India).<br />
Workshop, Seminar,Training, Foundation Day<br />
and Kisan Mela organised<br />
st<br />
• 41 Foundation day of the Institute was<br />
celebrated on August 18, <strong>2010</strong>. Dr. B.<br />
Mishra, Vice-Chancellor, Sher-e-Kashmir<br />
University of Agricultural Sciences and<br />
Technology, Jammu was the Chief Guest.<br />
42 nd foundation day was also celebrated<br />
on March 1, 20<strong>11</strong>. Dr. N.K. Tyagi, Member,<br />
ASRB was the Chief Guest<br />
• A kharif kisan mela on 8 th October, <strong>2010</strong> and rabi<br />
kisan mela on March 1, 20<strong>11</strong> was organized.<br />
More than 1500 farmers and students<br />
benefited from these melas. Seeds of different<br />
crop varieties were sold during the melas<br />
• Two days awareness programme for the<br />
farmers of Palwal (Haryana) was organised<br />
on Reclamation Technologies for Salt<br />
Affected <strong>Soil</strong>s during October 25-26, <strong>2010</strong>.<br />
Thirty farmers were participated in this<br />
programme<br />
• A National Symposium on Recent Outlook<br />
on Sustainable Agriculture, Livelihood<br />
Security and Ecology of Coastal Region’<br />
was organized by The Indian Society of<br />
Coastal Agricultural <strong>Research</strong> (ISCAR)<br />
from October 27-30, <strong>2010</strong> at Calangute, Goa<br />
<strong>11</strong>
Executive summary <strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
in collaboration with Dr Balasaheb Sawant<br />
Konkan Krishi Vidyapeeth, Ratnagiri,<br />
Dapoli, Maharashtra (Host University)<br />
• A model training course on Integrated<br />
Water Resources Management and Use<br />
of Poor Quality Water in Agriculture for<br />
Subject-Matter-Specialist/Officers of State<br />
Development Departments was organized<br />
from November 23-30, <strong>2010</strong>. In this training,<br />
21 officers from 10 states were participated<br />
• International training programme on Use<br />
of Poor Quality Water in Agriculture for<br />
AARDO (Afro-Asian Rural Development<br />
Organization) was organized from December<br />
1-14, <strong>2010</strong>. Seven delegates from Malaysia,<br />
Yemen, Syria, Iraq, Oman, Mauritius, and<br />
Bangladesh were participated<br />
• A farmers training and awareness<br />
programme on the Protection of Plant<br />
Varieties and Farmers Right was organized<br />
on December 28, <strong>2010</strong> in which about 100<br />
farmers and scientists participated<br />
Field exhibitions and visits<br />
Seven exhibitions on reclamation and<br />
management of salt affected soils and use of poor<br />
quality waters in agriculture were organized.<br />
Farmers and extension personnel visited the stalls<br />
and acquainted themselves with technologies<br />
developed by the Institute. During the year, 716<br />
farmers in 17 groups, 82 extension personnel in<br />
10 groups, 489 agriculture graduates in 7 groups<br />
and 10 scientists in 2 groups from India and<br />
abroad visited the Institute.<br />
Advisory services to the stakeholders<br />
A toll free telephone number 18001801014 is<br />
in operation at the institute. Large number of<br />
queries related to reclamation and management<br />
of sodic and saline soils, use of poor quality<br />
water and salt tolerant varieties of different<br />
crops are being raised by the farmer. They are<br />
being replied by the institute’s scientists.<br />
National and International Collaborative<br />
Projects<br />
International Collaborations<br />
• BIOSAFOR-BIOSALINE (AGRO)<br />
FORESTRY: Remediation of saline<br />
wastelands through production of<br />
renewable energy, biomaterials and fodder<br />
(Funded by European Union)<br />
• Stress tolerant rice for poor farmers of Africa<br />
and South Asia (Funded by IRRI-BMGF)<br />
• Enhancing and stabilizing the productivity<br />
of salt affected areas by incorporating<br />
genes for tolerance of abiotic stresses in rice<br />
(Funded by BMZ-IRRI)<br />
• Wheat improvement for waterlogging,<br />
salinity and element toxicities in Australia<br />
and India (sponsored by ACIAR, Australia)<br />
• Cereal systems initiative for South Asia<br />
(CSISA) (sponsored by IRRI Philippines<br />
and CIMMYT Mexico)<br />
• Marker assisted breeding of abiotic stress<br />
tolerant rice varieties with major QTL for<br />
drought, submergence and salt tolerance<br />
(DBT-India-IRRI)<br />
National Collaborations<br />
• Transgenics in crops-salinity tolerance<br />
in rice: functional genomics component<br />
(Funded by ICAR)<br />
• Monitoring and evaluation of large-scale<br />
subsurface drainage projects in the state of<br />
Haryana( Funded by Haryana Operational<br />
Pilot Project, DOA, Haryana)<br />
• Development and evaluation of salt tolerant<br />
transgenic rice (Funded by Department of<br />
Bio-technology)<br />
• Farmers’ participatory research on<br />
enhancing groundwater recharge and water<br />
productivity in North-West India (Funded<br />
by Ministry of Water Resources, GOI)<br />
• Control of waterlogging and salinity<br />
through agroforestry interventions (Funded<br />
by INCID)<br />
• Multi-locational evaluation of bread wheat<br />
germplasm (Funded by NBPGR)<br />
• AMAAS-Application of micro-organism in<br />
agriculture and allied sectors (Funded by<br />
ICAR)<br />
• Intellectual property management and<br />
transfer/commercialization of agricultural<br />
technology system (Funded by ICAR)<br />
12
<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
Executive summary<br />
• Development of spectral reflectance<br />
methods and low cost sensors for real<br />
time applications of variable rate inputs in<br />
precision farming (Funded by NAIP)<br />
• Network project on improvement of<br />
salt tolerance in wheat using molecular<br />
approach (DWR-<strong>CSSRI</strong>)<br />
• Decision support system for enhancing<br />
productivity in irrigated saline environment<br />
using remote sensing modelling and GIS<br />
(Funded by NAIP)<br />
Collaborative programmes at Regional<br />
<strong>Research</strong> Station, Canning Town<br />
International Collaborations<br />
• International collaborative programme on<br />
testing rice germplasm for coastal salinity<br />
(IRSSTN) with IRRI, Philippines<br />
• Advanced cultures on rice for shallow<br />
and deep water situations with IRRI,<br />
Philippines<br />
• IRRI-BMZ Project on incorporation of salt<br />
tolerance gene in rice<br />
National Collaborations<br />
• Coastal salinity tolerant varietal trial<br />
(CSTVT) with DRR, Hyderabad<br />
• Strategies for sustainable management<br />
of degraded coastal land and water for<br />
enhancing livelihood security of farming<br />
communities (NAIP GFF Funding )<br />
Collaborative programmes at Regional<br />
<strong>Research</strong> Station, Lucknow<br />
International Collaborations<br />
• Stress tolerant rice for poor farmers of Africa<br />
and South Asia (Funded by IRRI-BMGF)<br />
National Collaborations<br />
• Holistic approach for improved livelihood<br />
security through livestock based farming<br />
system in Barabanki and Rai Bareily districts<br />
of U.P. ( Funded by NAIP)<br />
Collaborative programmes at Regional<br />
<strong>Research</strong> Station, Bharuch<br />
National Collaborations<br />
• Feasibility study using biological sludge<br />
from Nitro-ETP Plant and treated effluent<br />
from Environmental Control Unit 1 of<br />
GNFC for crop production on Vertisols<br />
(GNVFC, Bharuch)<br />
• Feasibility studies on the use of treated<br />
effluent from Aniline-TDI Plant of GNFC<br />
Unit II in diverse crop interventions on<br />
Vertisols (GNVFC, Bharuch)<br />
Consultancies and Contractual <strong>Research</strong><br />
The institute scientists conducted following<br />
consultancies during theyear under report<br />
• Subsurface drainage for heavy soils of<br />
Maharashtra : <strong>CSSRI</strong>, Karnal- Rex-Poly<br />
Extrusion Pvt. Ltd., Sangli, Maharashtra<br />
• Feasiability study using biological sludge<br />
from Nitro-ETP Plant and treated effluent<br />
from environmental control unit 1 of GNFC<br />
for crop production on vertisols : <strong>CSSRI</strong>,<br />
RRS, Bharuch- The Gujarat Narmada Velley<br />
Fertiliser Co. Ltd. Narmada Nagar, Bharuch,<br />
Gujarat<br />
• Feasiability studies on the use of treated<br />
effluent from Aniline-TDI Plant of GNFC<br />
Unit-<strong>11</strong> in diverse crop interventions on<br />
vertisols : <strong>CSSRI</strong>, RRS, Bharuch- The Gujarat<br />
Narmada Velley Fertiliser Co. Ltd. Narmada<br />
Nagar, Bharuch, Gujarat<br />
Publications<br />
The Institute scientists published 40 research<br />
papers in peer reviewed journals, 35 book<br />
chapters, 4 books, 9 bulletins/folders, 38 popular<br />
articles besides 47 papers were presented in<br />
seminar/symposia and conferences.<br />
Scientists visits abroad, retired and joined<br />
To upgrade the knowledge and skills, 12 scientists<br />
of the institute visited different countries viz;<br />
USA, Australia, Thailand, Canada, United<br />
Kingdom, Tanzania, Brazil, Spain, Germany,<br />
Bangladesh and Vietnam. Two scientists have<br />
superannuated and 2 joined during the period<br />
under report.<br />
13
Introduction <strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
Historical Perspective<br />
<strong>Central</strong> <strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Salinity</strong> <strong>Research</strong> Institute (<strong>CSSRI</strong>)<br />
is a premier research institute dedicated to<br />
pursue interdisciplinary research on salinity/<br />
alkalinity management and use of poor quality<br />
irrigation waters in different agro-ecological<br />
zones of the country. The Govt. of India<br />
constituted an Indo-American Team to assist<br />
the Indian Council of Agricultural <strong>Research</strong> to<br />
develop a comprehensive water management<br />
programme for the country. As a follow up<br />
of these recommendations, it was decided to<br />
establish the <strong>Central</strong> <strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Salinity</strong> <strong>Research</strong><br />
Institute under Fourth Plan period. The Institute<br />
started functioning at Hisar (Haryana) on 1 st<br />
March, 1969. Later on, it was decided to shift<br />
this Institute to Karnal during October, 1969. In<br />
February 1970, the <strong>Central</strong> Rice <strong>Research</strong> Station,<br />
Canning Town, West Bengal was transferred to<br />
<strong>CSSRI</strong>, Karnal to conduct research on problems<br />
of coastal salinity. Another Regional <strong>Research</strong><br />
Station for carrying out research on problems<br />
of inland salinity prevailing in the black soil<br />
region of western parts of the country started<br />
functioning at Anand (Gujarat) from February,<br />
1989. As per recommendation of the QRT, the<br />
station was shifted from Anand to Bharuch<br />
in April 2003. Keeping in view the need of<br />
undertaking research for situations under<br />
surface drainage congestion, high water table<br />
conditions, relatively heavy textured soils,<br />
and indurated pan for managing alkali soils of<br />
<strong>Central</strong> and Eastern Gangetic Plains, another<br />
Regional Station was established during<br />
October, 1999 at Lucknow. The Coordinating<br />
Unit of AICRP on Management of Salt Affected<br />
<strong>Soil</strong>s and Use of Saline Water in Agriculture<br />
is located at the Institute with a network of<br />
eight research centres located in different agroecological<br />
regions of the country (Agra, Bapatala,<br />
Bikaner, Gangawati, Hisar, Indore, Kanpur<br />
and Tiruchirapalli). The Coordinating Unit of<br />
AICRP on Water Management functioned at the<br />
Institute from early seventies till it was shifted<br />
to Rahuri (Maharastra) in 1990.<br />
The Institute has grown into an internationally<br />
recognised esteemed centre of excellence in<br />
salinity research. Multidisciplinary research<br />
activities at the main institute are being<br />
strengthened through four research divisions.<br />
The major research activities in the Division of<br />
<strong>Soil</strong> and Crop Management include preparation<br />
and digitization of database on salt affected<br />
soils besides periodic assessment of state of<br />
soil resources, developing technologies for the<br />
optimal management of gypsum amended alkali<br />
soils and the use of high RSC and saline waters for<br />
crop production. In the post reclamation phase,<br />
focus is on developing resource conservation<br />
technologies and development of farming<br />
system models for resource poor farmers. Agroforestry<br />
on salt affected soils is another area of<br />
focus besides the production and evaluation of<br />
bio-fuel and bio-energy efficient plants from salt<br />
affected soils. Development and propagation<br />
of individual farmer based groundwater<br />
recharge technologies, subsurface drainage for<br />
amelioration of waterlogged saline soils and<br />
decision support systems for ground water<br />
contaminations are some of the major issues<br />
being addressed in the Division of Irrigation and<br />
Drainage Engineering. Development of high<br />
yielding genotypes of rice, wheat and mustard<br />
tolerant to salinity, alkalinity and waterlogging<br />
stresses by following conventional breeding and<br />
modern molecular and physiological approaches<br />
are the major concerns of the Division of Crop<br />
Improvement. The Division of Technology<br />
Evaluation and Transfer is studying constraints<br />
in the adoption of land reclamation technologies<br />
and their impact on rural development.<br />
The Institute has developed technologies for<br />
the reclamation of alkali soils with the addition<br />
of chemical amendments, reclamation of saline<br />
soils through subsurface drainage, development<br />
and release of salt tolerant crop varieties of rice,<br />
wheat and mustard and the reclamation of salt<br />
affected soils through salt tolerant trees. As such,<br />
nearly 1.5 million ha salt affected lands have been<br />
reclaimed and put to productive use. It has been<br />
estimated that reclaimed area is contributing<br />
14
<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
Introduction<br />
more than 15 million tonnes foodgrains to the<br />
national pool. For waterlogged saline soils,<br />
subsurface drainage technology developed by<br />
the Institute initially for Haryana has been widely<br />
adopted and replicated in Rajasthan, Gujarat,<br />
Andhra Pradesh, Maharastra and Karnataka.<br />
About 60,000 ha waterlogged saline areas have<br />
been reclaimed using this technology. Artificial<br />
groundwater recharge is another area of interest<br />
for regions with depleting wter table. Besides,<br />
the technologies are also being developed for<br />
the salt affected areas of vertisols and coastal<br />
regions of the country.<br />
An International Training Centre to impart<br />
training at national and international level was<br />
established during 2001 under Indo-Dutch<br />
collaborative research programme. The Institute<br />
has developed Post Graduate Education<br />
programme in association with State Agricultural<br />
Universities (SAUs), Indian Institute of<br />
Technology (IIT) and other Universities, which<br />
has contributed to the growth of the Institute<br />
substantially. The Institute has several national<br />
and international projects to fund its research<br />
and development activities. The notable<br />
programmes include: IRRI sponsored rice<br />
improvement programme, ACIAR sponsored<br />
programme for wheat improvement and IRRI,<br />
Philippines and CIMMYT, Mexico sponsored<br />
programme of cereal based systems.<br />
<strong>Central</strong> <strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Salinity</strong> <strong>Research</strong> Institute, Karnal<br />
has created state of the art facilities of sodic<br />
and saline micro-plots. Depending upon the<br />
objectives, desired stress levels of sodicity and<br />
salinity can be created in this facility for screening<br />
and better genotypic comparisons. Similarly, an<br />
environmentally controlled glass house facility<br />
is in place for growing crops and screening their<br />
genetic resources during off-season. This allows<br />
precise screening under saline hydroponics and<br />
advancement of breeding generation. Transgenic<br />
Green House facility has been created at <strong>CSSRI</strong><br />
in the year 2008 under Indo-US ABSPII program.<br />
A central laboratory with modern equipments<br />
has been established at the institute.<br />
Mandate<br />
The mandate of the Institute, as approved by<br />
the ICAR, is as follows:<br />
• To undertake basic and applied research<br />
for generating appropriate agrochemical/<br />
biological/hydraulic technologies for<br />
reclamation and management of salt<br />
affected soils and use of poor quality<br />
irrigation waters for sustainable production<br />
in different agro-ecological zones<br />
• To evolve, evaluate and recommend<br />
strategies that promote adoption of<br />
preventive/ameliorative technology<br />
• To be a nucleus of research on salinity<br />
management and coordinate/support<br />
the network of research with universities,<br />
institutions and agencies in the country<br />
for generating and testing location specific<br />
technologies<br />
• To act as a centre for training in salinity<br />
researches in the country and region and<br />
provide consultancy<br />
• To act as repository of information on<br />
resource inventories and management of<br />
salt affected soils and waters<br />
• To collaborate with relevant national and<br />
international agencies in achieving the<br />
above goals<br />
Organogram<br />
The current organisational set up for<br />
implementing its research programmes is<br />
shown below.<br />
Experimental Farm<br />
<strong>Research</strong> Farm, Karnal<br />
Agricultural farm at <strong>CSSRI</strong>, Karnal has a total<br />
area of 82 ha. A motorable road has been laid<br />
all along the boundary of this farm for regular<br />
monitoring, upkeep and proper watch and<br />
ward. Whole area of the farm under cultivation<br />
has been divided and laid out in standard plot<br />
size of 1.0 ha and each plot is connected with<br />
road for easy accessibility, underground water<br />
conveyance and lined channels for irrigation.<br />
15
Introduction <strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
Eight tube wells have been installed in the farm<br />
to meet irrigation water requirement of general<br />
agriculture, research experiments and water<br />
supply in the campus and laboratories. All<br />
essential farm machinery and implements are<br />
available, most farm operations are mechanized.<br />
To achieve the optimization of water and other<br />
inputs, all the plots are precisely leveled with<br />
laser leveler at regular intervals. Combination<br />
of different cropping systems is being practiced<br />
to optimize land use in the farm. Agro-forestry<br />
system comprising an array of tree species in<br />
combination with various arable crops covers an<br />
area of 6.5 ha. Area under research experiments<br />
during the year was 20.0 ha, while general<br />
crops covered an area of 17.5 ha. Out of the area<br />
under general crops, an area of 8.5 ha was put<br />
under seed production. To reduce the emission<br />
of GHGs, most of the area has been put under<br />
minimum tillage and no burning of residue is<br />
practiced. The productivity levels at the farm<br />
are high at evidenced from the following data.<br />
Among machinery and implements, the<br />
farm has multi-purpose crop thresher, turbo<br />
seeder, zero-till machine, laser leveler, tractors,<br />
Organisational set up of <strong>CSSRI</strong><br />
Productivity of crops at <strong>CSSRI</strong> farm<br />
Crop Variety Av. yield (t ha -1 )<br />
Rabi 2009 - 10<br />
Wheat KRL 19 4.20<br />
PBW 550 4.40<br />
HD 2894 4.49<br />
DBW 17 4.32<br />
PBW 343 4.14<br />
Mustard CS 54 1.57<br />
CS 56 1.38<br />
Gram HC 1 1.72<br />
Kharif <strong>2010</strong><br />
Paddy PUSA 44 5.34<br />
P <strong>11</strong>21 3.37<br />
CSR 30 1.89<br />
HKR 47 6.50<br />
hydraulic trolley, cleaner, shrub master and<br />
maize thresher etc. During the period under<br />
report, the farm unit has produced 26.6 and<br />
18.5 tonnes of quality seed of wheat and rice,<br />
respectively. Revenue of more than 85 lakhs was<br />
generated during the year <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong> from sale of<br />
farm produce and others.<br />
16
<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
Introduction<br />
Horticultural crops such as guava, mango,<br />
ber, aonla, jamun and litchi etc. covered an area<br />
of 7.6 ha, while fish ponds occupy another 2.5<br />
ha. An herbal garden with about 120 species<br />
of medicinal/aromatic herbs, shrubs and trees<br />
has also been established and maintained in<br />
an area of 1.4 ha for germplasm conservation.<br />
Remaining area of 26.5 ha is permanently<br />
covered under glass house, net houses, microplots,<br />
laboratories, offices, residences, oxidation<br />
pond, roads and landscape. Landscape of the<br />
whole area is looked after by farm unit.<br />
<strong>CSSRI</strong>, <strong>Research</strong> Farm, Hisar<br />
Hisar experimental farm is located on National<br />
Highway No. 10 near air strip of the town. This<br />
farm covers an area of 8.0 ha. The experiments<br />
on alternate cropping systems for development<br />
of suitable land use plans for rainfed saline<br />
groundwater regions are being conducted at<br />
Hisar. For meeting the saline water requirement,<br />
two shallow tubewells have been installed. One<br />
of the tubewell has low salinity (4-5 dS m -1 ) water<br />
while the second has water of high salinity (9-10<br />
dS m -1 ). Performance evaluation of fruit and<br />
forestry trees, medicinal and aromatic plants<br />
and different types of cactus, Prosopis, grasses,<br />
castor and Indian mustard with saline irrigation<br />
are being carried out.<br />
Finances<br />
Summary of allocation and expenditure during<br />
the year <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong> under plan and Non-plan<br />
budget along with externally funded schemes is<br />
presented below:<br />
Budget<br />
Sanctioned<br />
amount<br />
/receipts<br />
(Rs. in lakhs)<br />
Actual<br />
expenditure<br />
Non-plan 1763.00 1762.83<br />
Plan 315.00 314.49<br />
AICRP<br />
(Non-plan)<br />
AICRP<br />
(Plan)<br />
31.00 30.94<br />
325.00 324.99<br />
Total 2434.00 2433.25<br />
Staff<br />
The total staff strength of the institute is 370.<br />
The category wise details are<br />
Category of post Sanctioned In position<br />
Scientific 81 44<br />
Technical <strong>11</strong>7 108<br />
Administrative 58 52<br />
Skilled Supporting<br />
Staff<br />
Library<br />
<strong>11</strong>4 91<br />
Total 370 295<br />
The Institute library is well furnished and<br />
equipped with 4 computers. The library has<br />
total collection of 14684 books including Hindi<br />
books. A separate section is being maintained<br />
for Hindi books. There are 7967 bound volumes<br />
of the Journals. It has a rich collection of special<br />
publications of FAO, IRRI, UNESCO, ILRI, ICID,<br />
IFPRI, ASA and ASAE, which fulfils the needs<br />
of scientists, researchers, teachers and students.<br />
It subscribes to 85 Journals, out of which 63 are<br />
National and 22 International. Thirteen foreign<br />
journals are being received free online with<br />
our paid subscription for print version. Fifteen<br />
journals are being received on gratis. About 152<br />
theses on the subjects relating to soil science,<br />
agriculture engineering, water management,<br />
etc. are available. <strong>Annual</strong> reports from different<br />
Institutes and Agricultural Universities are<br />
being received from time to time. Readers are<br />
updated on fresh arrivals in the library on<br />
weekly basis. Total membership of library is 100<br />
including scientists, technical, administrative<br />
and research scholars, etc.<br />
The library works as a repository center where<br />
Institute’s publications such as <strong>Salinity</strong> News,<br />
Technical Bulletins, <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong>s, Brochures,<br />
etc. are stocked and sent to <strong>Research</strong> Institutes,<br />
Agricultural Universities, NAAS, QRT and RAC<br />
members, etc. and also distributed amongst the<br />
visiting farmers. The library also have 10 priced<br />
publications which are supplied on payment<br />
basis. The library provides services like Internet<br />
surfing, exploring, downloading and literature<br />
search through CDs like SOIL, AGRIS and Plant<br />
17
Introduction <strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
Gene. Internet access facility through CERA<br />
consortium for journals is also available. Interlibrary<br />
loan facility is also provided as per<br />
requirements. The library has been modernized,<br />
barcoded and computerized by using advanced<br />
software LS Ease/LIBSYS version 6.0.<br />
Laboratories<br />
Well equipped laboratories for undertaking<br />
research on various aspects of salinity<br />
management are in place with some of the<br />
advanced facilities like Atomic Absorption<br />
Spectro-photometer, Inductively coupled<br />
plasma (ICP), Carbon-Nitrogen-Hydrogen-<br />
Sulpher Analyser (CNHS), Ion Chromograph,<br />
UV VIS Spectrophotometer, HPLC, Radio meter,<br />
Kjeltek N- analyser, EM <strong>Salinity</strong> Probe, Neutron<br />
Moisturemeter, Scientillation Counter, Growth<br />
Chamber etc. Large number of screen houses<br />
and microplots are also available for precision<br />
experimental works. The facilities of image<br />
processing and interpreting satellite imageries<br />
and geographical information system are also<br />
available. Recently, a multimedia laboratory<br />
has also been established to cater to the need of<br />
photographic and image processing and power<br />
point presentation etc.<br />
Allied Facilities<br />
A conference hall, seminar room and an<br />
auditorium with modern facilities are available<br />
for scientific meetings and group discussions.<br />
The institute has a museum with exhibits<br />
depicting salient research findings and the latest<br />
technologies developed at the institute. The<br />
museum is being upgraded with addition of new<br />
exhibits and state of art display infrastructure/<br />
material. An international guest house and a<br />
scientists hostel with boarding facilities caters to<br />
the need of scientists and other visitors. Besides,<br />
there is an extension hostel for students and<br />
trainees. A dispensary with physiotherapy unit<br />
is also available in the institute. A sports complex<br />
consisting of playgrounds for football, hockey,<br />
cricket, volley ball, lawn tennis court etc. besides<br />
indoor facilities for table tennis, chess, carom and<br />
badminton are available in the institute. The staff<br />
recreation club functions to meet the recreational<br />
requirements of the staff. Besides this, a Staff<br />
Welfare Club is also functioning actively for the<br />
welfare of the <strong>CSSRI</strong> staff.<br />
<br />
18
<strong>Research</strong> Achievements
<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
DATABASE ON SALT AFFECTED SOILS<br />
Digital Database of Salt Affected <strong>Soil</strong>s<br />
using Geographic Information System (A.K.<br />
Mandal)<br />
Geo-referenced maps of salt affected soils<br />
in digital format are more useful than<br />
analogue maps printed on cartographic<br />
sheets. Digitization of salt affected soils was<br />
accomplished for fifteen states based on the<br />
salt affected soils maps (NRSA and associates<br />
1997) on 1:250,000 scale using ILWIS software.<br />
These maps were compiled in GIS to prepare a<br />
digital mosaic of salt affected soils map for the<br />
country scale (Fig. 1). The map legend consists<br />
of codes and descriptions for soils depicting<br />
nature of salts. The criteria for categorizing soil<br />
salinity was the ranges of ECe (4-8, 8-30 and<br />
>30 dS m -1 ), pHs (9.0) and<br />
ESP (40) values. Different codes<br />
were used to describe the physiographic units.<br />
Fifteen categories of soils identified includes<br />
three categories of saline (s 1<br />
, s 2<br />
and s 3<br />
), three of<br />
sodic (n 1<br />
, n 2<br />
and n 3<br />
) and nine of saline-sodic soils<br />
(s 1<br />
n 1<br />
, s 1<br />
n 2<br />
, s 1<br />
n 3<br />
, s 2<br />
n 1<br />
, s 2<br />
n 2<br />
, s 2<br />
n 3<br />
, s 3<br />
n 1<br />
, s 3<br />
n 2<br />
and s 3<br />
n 3<br />
).<br />
Keeping in view the scale limitation and the<br />
soil management aspects, these categories were<br />
merged and two categories of salt affected soils<br />
viz; saline and sodic were made. An area of 6.73<br />
million ha (Table 1) was estimated salt affected,<br />
of which 3.77 and 2.95 million ha are sodic and<br />
saline, respectively.<br />
Saline soils: Saline soils are distributed in<br />
inland and coastal regions associated with arid/<br />
semi-arid and humid climates. These soils are<br />
commonly found in Andhra Pradesh, West<br />
Bengal, Orissa, Tamil Nadu and Andaman and<br />
Nicobar islands on the east coast covering an<br />
area of 756239 ha (<strong>11</strong>.2%) and Gujarat, Kerala,<br />
Karnataka and Maharashtra on the west coast of<br />
India covering 634958 ha (9.4%). The presence<br />
of heavy textured soil, poor drainage condition,<br />
poor quality of ground water and lack of<br />
good quality irrigation water enhance salinity<br />
development in this region.<br />
Sodic soils: These soils are occurring in various<br />
physiographic units such as aeofluvial/aeolian/<br />
arid (B), coastal (D), alluvial (A) and others<br />
(H) plains in north-west India and peninsular<br />
(F) plains in central and southern India. Data<br />
showed the distribution of salt affected soils<br />
in diverse physiographic regions and agroclimatic<br />
conditions and the soil characteristics<br />
are variable and complex in nature.<br />
Nationwide Mapping of Land Degradation<br />
using Multi-temporal Satellite Data (A.K.<br />
Mandal)<br />
Mapping and characterization of salt affected<br />
soils in Haryana using remote sensing<br />
Fig.1 : Salt affected soils in India<br />
The Cheeka block of Kurukshetra district was<br />
surveyed for the assessment of land The IRS<br />
LISS III data for Feb.-March, May-June and<br />
October-November 2005-06 were interpreted<br />
visually and incidences of waterlogging and soil<br />
salinization/alkalization on bare soil surface and<br />
stressed vegetation cover were identified. Based<br />
on the visual interpretation of IRS data, ground<br />
truth was conducted to verify and authenticate<br />
interpreted units. Based on the ground truth<br />
21
Database on salt affected soils <strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
Table 1: Distribution of salt affected soils in physiographic regions in different states of India<br />
Physiographic units<br />
Sr.<br />
N.<br />
States<br />
1. Andhra<br />
Pardesh<br />
2.<br />
Andaman<br />
& Nicobar<br />
Alluvial<br />
plain<br />
(A)<br />
Aeo-fluvial/<br />
Aeolian/<br />
Arid<br />
plain (B)<br />
Deltaic<br />
plain<br />
(C)<br />
Coastal<br />
plain<br />
(D)<br />
Mud flats/<br />
Mangrove<br />
Swamps<br />
(G)<br />
Peninsular<br />
plain<br />
(F)<br />
Others<br />
(H)<br />
Total<br />
Area<br />
(ha)<br />
- - - 56423 25<strong>11</strong>1 192673 - 274207<br />
- - - 12366 64634 - - 77000<br />
3. Bihar 153153 - - - - - - 153153<br />
4 Gujarat 510951 285574 - 462315 - - 963160 2222000<br />
5. Haryana 232556 - - - - - - 232556<br />
6. Karnataka 148922 - - 586 - 521 - 150029<br />
7. Kerala - - - 20000 - - - 20000<br />
8. Maharashtra - - 43023 6719 283 599757 496 606759<br />
9.<br />
Madhya<br />
Pradesh<br />
- - - - - 139720 - 139720<br />
10. Orissa - - - 79543 24572 - - 147138<br />
<strong>11</strong>. Punjab 151717 - - - - - - 151717<br />
12. Rajasthan - 338128 - - - - 36814 374942<br />
13. Tamil Nadu - - - 16805 - 351210 - 368015<br />
14.<br />
15.<br />
Uttar<br />
Pradesh<br />
West<br />
Bengal<br />
1368960 - - - - - - 1368960<br />
- - 109613 - 331659 - - 441272<br />
Total 2566259 623702 152636 654757 446259 1283881 999974 6727468<br />
data and discussion with the local farmers<br />
a considerable area of soil salinization/<br />
alkalization underlain by poor quality GW was<br />
identified in the Ghaggar flood plain covering<br />
Khusal Majra, Nandgarh, Hansu Majra, Bhatia,<br />
Majri, Kheri Daban and its adjoining villages.<br />
Results revealed that the soils were slight to<br />
moderately sodic and the presence of calcium<br />
carbonate nodules and kankar layer was found<br />
at a depth below the surface horizon (Table<br />
2). The satellite data revealed signatures of<br />
temporary water stagnation as evidenced by the<br />
high water absorption on the satellite imagery in<br />
rabi season. A discussion with the local farmers<br />
revealed that the application of poor quality<br />
(alkali) ground water also reduced infiltration<br />
rate affecting germination and growth of wheat<br />
crop. The CaCO 3<br />
content was higher in Pedon 1<br />
increasing from 4.4 to 9.5 per cent with depth.<br />
High concentration of sodium was observed<br />
in Pedon 5 indicating surface accumulation of<br />
sodium salts in a lower topographic position<br />
with runoff material. The Ca+Mg content was<br />
moderate, ranging from 6.0 to 15.0 in Pedon<br />
5 but low in other pedons. The bicarbonate<br />
contents are low to moderate in all the pedons.<br />
Appreciable amount of chloride at surface to<br />
13.5 cm depth in Pedon 5 showed dominance of<br />
sodium chloride. The other pedons with low to<br />
moderate ECe and pHs are slight to moderately<br />
sodic nature. The CEC values ranged from 16.8<br />
to 21.2 cmol kg -1 in pedon 1, 18.1 to 23.4 in Pedon<br />
2, 15.2 to 17.9 in pedon 4 indicating the presence<br />
of fine textured soils. The OC contents are, in<br />
general, high at surface and low below it. These<br />
22
<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
Database on salt affected soils<br />
Table 2 : Characteristic of selected salt affected soils in Kurukshetra district of Haryana<br />
<strong>Soil</strong><br />
ECe<br />
Ca<br />
Na K<br />
Cl HCO<br />
depth pHs (dS<br />
+Mg<br />
3 CEC<br />
Sand Silt Clay Texture<br />
(cmol<br />
ESP<br />
(%) (%) (%)<br />
(cm)<br />
m -1 ) -----------------me L -1 ------------------ kg -1 )<br />
Pedon 1: Village Landalheri Distrct Kurukshetra 30 o 08’56.3”N 76 o 24’37.2”E<br />
O.C.<br />
(%)<br />
CaCO 3<br />
(%)<br />
0-15 9.4 1.2 13.3 0.1 1.5 5.0 5.0 19.2 47.1 28.1 24.8 53.1 Sil 0.60 4.4<br />
15-30 9.6 1.4 15.7 0.1 1.0 4.0 6.0 16.8 38.5 24.8 36.7 66.7 Sicl 0.20 8.1<br />
30-60 9.7 1.6 18.5 0.1 1.0 4.5 7.0 20.0 38.0 33.3 28.8 69.0 Sicl 0.10 5.2<br />
60-90 9.6 1.7 19.5 0.1 2.5 3.0 6.0 21.2 35.9 39.7 24.5 58.5 Sil 0.20 9.5<br />
Pedon 2: Village Majri Distrct Kurukshetra 29 o 59’35.2”N 76 o 13’41.6”E<br />
0-15 9.1 1.4 10.6 0.08 3.0 8.5 3.3 23.4 50.2 27.0 22.8 40.2 Sil 0.47 2.1<br />
15-30 8.5 4.0 29.8 0.07 4.0 20.0 3.5 21.0 46.0 31.3 22.6 26.6 Sil 0.33 1.6<br />
30-60 8.5 3.1 25.3 0.08 4.0 16.0 3.5 18.1 47.2 32.3 20.5 26.5 Sil 0.07 1.9<br />
60-90 8.5 2.6 22.1 0.05 4.5 14.0 5.3 18.4 51.7 28.2 20.1 22.8 Sil 0.03 2.1<br />
Pedon 3: Village Kamheri Distrct Kurukshetra 30 o 06’58.00”N 76 o 21’57.3”E<br />
0-15 9.0 1.5 14.4 0.0 3.0 4.5 2.5 13.3 53.8 21.7 24.4 51.1 l 0.60 3.0<br />
15-30 9.1 1.9 21.0 0.1 3.0 3.0 3.8 12.3 23.1 29.0 47.8 63.4 sic 0.40 3.0<br />
30-60 9.1 2.6 26.6 0.0 3.0 3.0 4.3 14.4 53.1 19.1 27.8 52.8 cl 0.40 2.3<br />
60-90 9.2 2.5 24.5 0.0 3.0 3.5 3.8 14.4 50.8 18.5 30.7 52.8 cl 0.10 1.4<br />
Pedon 4: Village Tatiana Dist Kurukshetra 30 o 05’04.8”N 76 o 20’34.7”E<br />
0-15 8.2 1.8 20.0 0.1 4.0 5.5 3.5 17.9 45.7 24.5 29.8 40.2 cl 0.60 1.4<br />
15-30 8.5 1.1 <strong>11</strong>.0 0.1 1.5 4.5 1.5 12.3 61.9 17.9 20.1 42.3 l 0.40 1.5<br />
30-60 8.7 1.2 13.2 0.1 4.5 4.5 3.8 19.5 59.2 20.7 20.2 38.9 l 0.30 1.4<br />
60-90 9.0 1.4 15.1 0.1 4.0 5.5 3.5 15.2 59.4 20.5 20.1 52.6 l 0.30 1.2<br />
Pedon 5: Village Baopur Dist Kurukshetra 30o05’43.1”N 76o22’59.3”E<br />
0-30 7.8 5.6 45.6 0.2 9.5 24.5 4.3 14.7 39.5 41.0 31.9 27.0 sicl 0.50 1.5<br />
30-60 7.7 4.4 36.3 0.1 6.0 14.5 3.0 16.3 29.4 32.0 32.8 35.2 sicl 0.40 0.8<br />
60-90 7.5 4.8 37.8 0.1 15.0 13.5 1.5 15.7 35.7 26.1 36.7 37.2 sicl 0.50 0.8<br />
90-120 7.4 3.8 30.5 0.1 12.0 14.5 1.5 19.5 28.7 22.0 35.6 42.4 sic 0.50 0.7<br />
*{cmol (p + ) kg -1 }<br />
soils need proper soil and water management<br />
and application of gypsum for amelioration<br />
before initiating agricultural production. The<br />
area lacked good quality irrigation to flush out<br />
excess salts deposited from the application of<br />
poor quality ground water. Suitable salt tolerant<br />
varieties may also be practiced for sustained<br />
agriculture particularly in the rabi season.<br />
Salt inflictions and seasonal waterlogging<br />
causing land degradation in a part of<br />
Kurukshetra district of Haryana<br />
Mapping Salt Affected, Waterlogged <strong>Soil</strong>s<br />
in Rohtak, Jhajjar and Bhiwani Districts of<br />
Haryana using Remote Sensing and GIS<br />
(Madhurama Sethi , M.L Khurana, S.K. Gupta<br />
and D.S. Bundela)<br />
IRS P-6, LISS III images of 2006 and 2007 (Fig.<br />
2) with a resolution of 23.5 m were used to map<br />
and identify salt affected soils of Jhajjar District,<br />
Haryana. The (SOI) topographic maps on<br />
1:50000 scale were used for geo referencing and<br />
base map preparation. The study area lies<br />
23
Database on salt affected soils <strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
Fig.2 : IRS P6 LISS III image (7 February, 2006) of<br />
Jhajjar district<br />
between 28 ˚ 33’ to 28 ˚ 42’ N and 76˚ 28’ to<br />
76 ˚ 84’ E . GPS assisted ground truth was<br />
conducted to collect soil samples from different<br />
sites (Fig. 3). The area represents alluvial<br />
plain and undulating dunes with an average<br />
elevation of 222 m above mean sea level. The<br />
soil texture varied from sandy to clay with a<br />
variable composition. The soil of Sahlawas and<br />
Mattanhail Blocks pertaining to salinity and<br />
waterlogging affected areas are sandy to sandy<br />
loam in texture.<br />
The pHs ranged from 6.7 to 9.3 and ECe from<br />
0 .69 to 99.4 dS m -1 at 0-15 cm depth (Fig. 4).<br />
The Na, K, Ca+Mg values were transferred to<br />
GIS for further processing. Both salinity and<br />
waterlogging were identified on the images.<br />
Fig.3 : Location of soil samples by GPS of Jhajjar district<br />
Fig. 4 : <strong>Soil</strong> characteristics of Jhajjar district<br />
Spectral signatures of each sample site were<br />
collected and the ISODATA algorithm was<br />
used to cluster the pixels into similar classes. 6<br />
x 6 pixels for each class were isolated based on<br />
spectral signature. Training sites were decided<br />
for different classes with maximum likelihood<br />
algorithm for supervised classification (Fig.5).<br />
degradation.<br />
The salt affected classes of severely salt affected/<br />
barren soil covered 159.53 km 2 . Moderately salt<br />
affected lands supporting agriculture covered<br />
621.58 km 2 . Waterlogged and saline soils cover<br />
Fig.5 : Supervised classification of IRS P6 LISS III<br />
satellite image of Jhajjar district<br />
24
<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
Database on salt affected soils<br />
Table 3 : Land classification of Jhajjar area<br />
Land cover Classes Area (km 2 )<br />
Severely salt affected/barren 159.53<br />
Moderately salt affected 621.58<br />
Waterlogged and saline soils 129.87<br />
Normal cropped 826.23<br />
Sand 74.16<br />
Water bodies 18.09<br />
Total Area 1829 .46<br />
129.87 km 2 (Table 3). The classification produced<br />
an accuracy of 87.25 per cent.<br />
Supervised classification of IRS data showed<br />
accuracy of 87.25 per cent for mapping salt<br />
affected soils in Jhajjar district.<br />
Development of Spectral Reflectance<br />
Methods and Low Cost Sensors for Real-<br />
Time Application of Variable Rate Inputs in<br />
Precision Farming (Madhurama Sethi, D.S.<br />
Bundela, R.K.Yadav)<br />
Three sites were chosen at Village Waiser in<br />
Panipat, Jagsi in Sonepat and Kahni in Rohtak<br />
districts (Fig. 6).<br />
QUICKBIRD imagery and IRS P-6 data were<br />
used for the identification of salt affected areas.<br />
These images were geo-referenced using the SOI<br />
topography supported by the village cadastral<br />
map.<br />
<strong>Soil</strong> samples were collected during kharif from<br />
0-15 cm depth using the YUMA GPS. The<br />
samples were analysed for pH, EC, Na, K,<br />
Ca+Mg. The data were uploaded into the GIS<br />
for mapping and database generation.<br />
The texture of the soils ranged from loam to clay<br />
loam at Waiser village. The pHs ranged from 7.2<br />
to 9.1. The ECe ranged from 0.5 to 7.5 dS m -1 .<br />
The ESP ranged from 1.4 to 31 per cent. The<br />
carbonate is absent and bicarbonate is low.<br />
GPS data were overlaid on the rectified satellite<br />
image. A geo-database was created with all layers<br />
viz; canals, roads, drainage and soil sampling<br />
points. The krigged maps were generated on<br />
areas for different soil parameters at different<br />
depths. The laboratory measured reflectance<br />
spectra of soils indicated that soils are rich in<br />
chloride and sulfate salts than carbonate and<br />
bicarbonate. (Fig. 7)<br />
Krigged maps for different soil parameters<br />
were generated using remote sensing data,<br />
GIS and ground truth<br />
Fig. 6 : Project study sites in Haryana<br />
Fig. 7 : Spectral behaviour of selected salt affected soils<br />
<br />
25
<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
RECLAMATION AND MANAGEMENT OF ALKALI SOILS<br />
Evaluation of Resource Conservation<br />
Technologies in Rice–Wheat Cropping System<br />
(Ranbir Singh , Gurbachan Singh, S.K. Sharma,<br />
P.K. Joshi , P. Dey and S.K. Chaudhari)<br />
Performance of rice-wheat sequence is being<br />
evaluated under various resource conservation<br />
techniques to address some of the problems faced<br />
by the farmers in managing natural resources for<br />
increasing rice-wheat productivity. Experiment<br />
initiated during kharif 2006 was continued. After<br />
rice crop, wheat (cv. PBW-343) was sown in the<br />
second week of November adopting different<br />
crop establishment techniques. The results are<br />
presented in Table 4.<br />
Amongest the treatments tested, highest yield<br />
of wheat (5.58 t ha -1 ) was recorded in reduced<br />
tillage with rice residue incorporation followed<br />
by zero tillage (Sesbania green manuring before<br />
rice). Permanent raised beds yielded 4.38 t ha -1 ,<br />
which was significantly lower as compared to<br />
other crop establishment techniques. Wheat<br />
grain yield was greater in zero tillage with<br />
rice residue retention, as rice residue creates<br />
mulch condition from the seed germination up<br />
to grain formation and might have maintained<br />
favourable hydro-thermal regime. Residual<br />
effects of crop residue incorporation increased<br />
the wheat grain yields by 7.0 per cent over<br />
conventional sowing with crop residue and 6.0<br />
per cent under reduced tillage cultivation with<br />
crop residue incorporation. Sowing of wheat in<br />
zero tillage in rice residue increased the grain<br />
yield by 8.0 per cent in comparison to wheat in<br />
zero tillage without residue. The results revealed<br />
that crop residue either incorporated or retained<br />
increased the grain yield and improved the soil<br />
health.<br />
During kharif season, rice (cv. Ariz 6179) was<br />
cultivated with different crop establishment<br />
techniques (Table 5). Direct seeding of rice<br />
was done on 5 th June, <strong>2010</strong> with a zero tillage<br />
machine, whereas transplanting was done<br />
on 10 th July, <strong>2010</strong>. The maximum yield was<br />
obtained in conventional rice transplanting after<br />
Sesbania green manuring (8.63 t ha -1 ) followed<br />
by conventional transplanting with wheat<br />
residue incorporation (8.28 t ha -1 ). There was<br />
significant difference in yield of puddled and<br />
un-puddled transplanted rice. Direct seeded<br />
rice in standing wheat stubbles gave the yield<br />
of 5.75 t ha -1 , whereas direct seeded rice with<br />
Table 4 : Effect of different crop establishment techniques on grain and straw yield of wheat (2009-10)<br />
Crop establishment techniques<br />
Straw<br />
yield<br />
(t ha -1 )<br />
Grain<br />
yield<br />
(t ha -1 )<br />
Relative<br />
yield<br />
(%)<br />
Conventional sowing without residue 6.48 5.16 100.0<br />
Conventional sowing after rice residue incorporation 6.65 5.48 106.2<br />
Sowing in reduced tillage after direct seeded rice without residue<br />
incorporation<br />
6.28 5.26 101.9<br />
Sowing in reduced tillage after direct seeded rice with residue<br />
incorporation<br />
6.59 5.58 108.1<br />
Sowing in zero tillage without residue 6.17 4.63 89.7<br />
Sowing in zero tillage in rice residue 6.39 4.96 96.1<br />
Sowing on old rice beds 6.03 4.38<br />
Sowing on fresh beds after un-puddle rice 6.35 5.23 99.0<br />
Sowing in zero tillage (Sesbania brown manuring in rice) 6.71 5.35 103.0<br />
Sowing in zero tillage (Sesbania green manuring before rice) 6.85 5.54 105.0<br />
CD (p = 0.05) 0.27 0.31 -<br />
26
<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
Reclamation and management of alkali soils<br />
Wheat crop sown with conventional tillage (left) and reduced tillage (right) without residue<br />
Table 5 : Effect of different crop establishment techniques on yield and water productivity of rice (<strong>2010</strong>)<br />
Crop establishment techniques<br />
Grain<br />
yield a<br />
(t ha -1 )<br />
Water<br />
applied<br />
(m)<br />
Rainfall<br />
(m)<br />
Water<br />
productivity<br />
(Kg m -3 )<br />
Applied<br />
water<br />
saving (%)<br />
Conventional rice transplanting<br />
without residue<br />
Conventional rice transplanting with<br />
residue incorporation<br />
7.91 0.53 0.94 0.54 -<br />
8.28 0.53 0.94 0.57 -<br />
Direct seeded rice without residue 6.48 0.38 1.00 0.47 29.0<br />
Direct seeded rice after wheat residue<br />
incorporation<br />
6.80 0.38 1.00 0.50 29.0<br />
Direct seeded rice in zero tillage 6.15 0.38 1.00 0.45 29.0<br />
Direct seeded rice in zero tillage in<br />
wheat residue<br />
5.75 0.38 1.00 0.42 29.0<br />
Rice transplanting on raised beds 5.58 0.42 0.94 0.45 21.0<br />
Rice transplanting in un-puddle<br />
condition<br />
7.43 0.53 0.94 0.51 -<br />
Direct seeded rice + Sesbania 6.77 0.35 1.00 0.51 34.0<br />
Conventional rice transplanting after<br />
Sesbania green manuring<br />
8.63 0.53 0.94 0.59 -<br />
CD (p = 0.05) 0.33 - - -- --<br />
a<br />
Grain yield at 14% moisture<br />
Sesbania brown manuring yielded 6.77 t ha -1 .<br />
During this season, erratic results were obtained<br />
in direct seeded rice due to relatively high weed<br />
menifestation. Majority of grasses comprised<br />
of Cyprus rotundus (motha), Echinochloa crusgali<br />
(Barta), Echinochloa colonum (Sanmak), makra<br />
etc grew profusely because of high rainfall. The<br />
gross water productivity in different treatments<br />
ranged from 0.42 to 0.59 kg m -3 . The maximum<br />
water productivity was obtained in conventional<br />
rice transplanting after Sesbania green manuring<br />
(0.59 kg m -3 ). Lower water productivity in direct<br />
seeded rice was due to weed infestation during<br />
the crop season. Irrigation was applied when<br />
soil surface became little dry in direct seeded<br />
rice techniques. Maximum water saving of<br />
applied water was recorded in direct seeded<br />
rice + Sesbania (34.0%) followed by direct<br />
27
Reclamation and management of alkali soils <strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
Conventional rice transplanting without residue (left) and with wheat residue incorporation (right)<br />
seeded rice in different treatments (29.0%). The<br />
water saving in raised bed transplanting was<br />
21.0 per cent. After four years of experiment,<br />
positive improvement in soil physico-chemical<br />
and biological properties (soil organic carbon,<br />
available N, available P and saturated hydraulic<br />
conductivity, bulk density, soil dispersion and<br />
available water content) was observed when the<br />
crop was sown with residue incorporation as<br />
compared to without crop residue incorporation.<br />
<strong>Soil</strong> aggregate percentage increased with<br />
organic carbon (Fig. 8). <strong>Soil</strong> aggregation<br />
in different crop establishment techniques<br />
varied from 5.20 to 40.52 per cent. Maximum<br />
soil aggregates (40.52%) were recorded in<br />
conventional rice transplanting after Sesbania<br />
green manuring followed by direct seeded rice<br />
Wheat sowing in zero and reduced tillage with<br />
crop residue seems to be a promising option for<br />
sustained wheat yield. Wheat yield increased<br />
with residue incorporation or retention in zero<br />
tillage technique. Direct seeded rice saved<br />
29.0 to 34.0 per cent applied water in different<br />
treatments with marginal reduction in yield as<br />
compared to conventional transplanting<br />
after wheat residue incorporation (32.08%) and<br />
minimum soil aggregates (5.2%) were recorded<br />
in conventional rice transplanting without<br />
residue.<br />
Efficient Use of Organic Waste Material as<br />
Mulching in Maize-Wheat Cropping System<br />
in Reclaimed Sodic <strong>Soil</strong>s (H.S. Jat, Ranbir Singh<br />
and Gurbachan Singh)<br />
Performance of maize-wheat system is being<br />
evaluated under conservation tillage practices.<br />
Experiment initiated during kharif 2009 was<br />
continued during kharif <strong>2010</strong>. The results<br />
indicated that the planting methods did not have<br />
any effect on grain and straw yield of wheat and<br />
maize crops (Table 6). Overall productivity of<br />
maize-wheat system was more or less similar<br />
(8.18 and 8.07 t ha -1 ) under flat and bed planting<br />
techniques.<br />
Fig. 8 : Effect of resource conservation techniques (RCT)<br />
on soil aggregates and organic carbon content in<br />
0-15 cm soil layer<br />
Application of organic waste as mulching<br />
materials influenced the yield of both crops. The<br />
data indicated that the grain yield of wheat was<br />
28
<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
Reclamation and management of alkali soils<br />
Table 6 : Effect of planting and organic waste mulching on yield of wheat and maize crops<br />
Treatments<br />
significantly higher when mulching was done<br />
with Jatropha (4.48 t ha -1 ) over no mulching (4.05<br />
t ha -1 ). Rest of the treatment had no significant<br />
effect on grain yield of wheat. The same trend<br />
was observed with straw yield of wheat. In<br />
the case of maize, mulching with Sesbania (4.12<br />
t ha -1 ), Brassica (4.18 t ha -1 ) and Jatropha (4.05<br />
t ha -1 ) produced significantly higher grain<br />
yield over no mulching. The higher water<br />
Wheat yield (t ha -1 ) Maize yield (t ha -1 )<br />
Grain Straw Grain Straw<br />
Flat planting 4.33 5.77 3.85 5.29<br />
Bed planting 4.14 5.32 3.93 5.50<br />
SEm ± 0.68 1.50 0.81 1.49<br />
CD (P=0.05) NS NS NS NS<br />
T 1<br />
- No mulching 4.05 5.20 3.47 4.98<br />
T 2<br />
- Sesbania rostrata 4.46 5.81 4.12 5.39<br />
T 3<br />
- Brassica juncea 4.26 5.64 4.18 5.35<br />
T 4<br />
- Prosopis juliflora 4.01 5.20 3.71 5.43<br />
T 5<br />
- Jatropha curcas 4.48 5.84 4.05 5.78<br />
T 6<br />
– Leuceana leucocephala 4.14 5.58 3.80 5.44<br />
SEm ± 0.14 0.20 0.14 0.25<br />
CD (p=0.05) 0.41 0.61 0.41 0.76<br />
Table 7 : Influence of planting methods and mulching on irrigation water productivity and saving in maizewheat<br />
cropping system<br />
Treatments<br />
Irrigation water productivity (kg m -3 )<br />
Maize Wheat Maize-wheat<br />
Irrigation<br />
water saving<br />
(%)<br />
Flat planting 1.91 0.97 1.26 -<br />
Bed planting 2.60 1.22 1.64 24.<strong>11</strong><br />
SEm ± 0.08 0.05 0.08<br />
CD (p=0.05) 0.24 0.15 0.24<br />
T 1<br />
- No mulching 1.93 1.01 1.30 -<br />
T 2<br />
- Sesbania rostrata 2.37 1.16 1.53 3.62<br />
T 3<br />
- Brassica juncea 2.38 1.10 1.50 3.10<br />
T 4<br />
- Prosopis juliflora 2.09 1.02 1.36 1.90<br />
T 5<br />
- Jatropha curcas 2.29 1.13 1.49 1.38<br />
T 6<br />
- Leuceana leucocephala 2.16 1.05 1.39 1.90<br />
SEm ± 0.06 0.05 0.07<br />
CD (p=0.05) 0.18 0.15 0.21<br />
productivity (Table 7) of maize and wheat was<br />
recorded in bed planting (2.60 and 1.22 kg m -3 ) as<br />
compared to flat planting (1.91 and 0.97 kg m -3 ).<br />
In maize-wheat cropping system, higher water<br />
productivity was observed with bed planting<br />
(1.64 kg m -3 ) over flat planting (1.26 kg m -3 ).<br />
Application of mulching registered higher water<br />
productivity than without mulching treatments<br />
in maize-wheat cropping system. Bed planting<br />
29
Reclamation and management of alkali soils <strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
Flat planting of maize crop Bed planting of maize crop Bed planting of Wheat crop<br />
Fig. 9: <strong>Soil</strong> Moisture as influenced by planting methods<br />
and mulching<br />
method in maize-wheat cropping system saved<br />
24.<strong>11</strong> per cent irrigation water over flat planting<br />
but there was a negligible (1.38 to 3.62%) saving<br />
of water with various mulching treatments.<br />
<strong>Soil</strong> moisture in 0-15 cm depth at harvest was<br />
significantly higher under flat planting (12.65%)<br />
over bed planting (10.45 %). But the reverse trend<br />
was observed in 15-30 cm depth (Fig.9). Under<br />
different mulching treatments, application of<br />
Brassica mulching registered the higher soil<br />
moisture (12.80%) over no mulching at 0-15 cm<br />
depth. At 15-30 cm depth, Brassica mulching<br />
registered 14.75 per cent soil moisture and at<br />
par with Jatropha and Sesbania. However, at 30-<br />
60 cm depth, Brassica mulching recorded the<br />
higher soil moisture (14.90%) over no mulching<br />
(13.50%).<br />
Sesbania, Brassica and Jatropha proved to be very<br />
good mulching materials for higher productivity<br />
of maize-wheat sequence. Bed planting saved 24<br />
per cent irrigation water over flat planting.<br />
Diagnosis, Definition and Interventions for<br />
Salt-Affected <strong>Soil</strong>s of Indo-Gangetic Plains in<br />
Participatory Appraisal (R.K. Yadav, Khajanchi<br />
Lal, Neeraj Kulshrestha, Sharad Kumar Singh<br />
and Satyendra Kumar)<br />
The field experiments were initiated on<br />
farmers’ fields in Ghaggar plains of Punjab<br />
and Haryana during 2008 where the problem<br />
of poor grain filling in rice and wheat crops<br />
was reported. The experiments were continued<br />
during the report period. Morpho-physicochemical<br />
characteristics of soils of the site<br />
showed that soil is silty clay, moderately<br />
sodic, deep to very deep, poorly drained and<br />
cracking with low AWC. Groundwater used<br />
for irrigation has RSC ranging from 3.5 to 6.0<br />
me L -1 . Some prospective physical, chemical<br />
and agronomic strategies are being evaluated<br />
in an integrated manner. Laser leveling and<br />
chiseling at 3 m distance comprised physical<br />
interventions. Application of recommended<br />
dose of NPK (chemical) for respective crops;<br />
recommended dose of NPK (chemical) + 100%<br />
GR; recommended dose of NPK (chemical) +<br />
groundwater RSC neutralization; 50% NPK<br />
(chemical) + 50% through rice straw + 50% GR<br />
and 50% NPK (chemical) + 50% through FYM<br />
+ 50% GR comprised the chemical measures.<br />
Agronomic strategies included cultivation of<br />
paddy in puddle condition, zero till DSR, DSR in<br />
tilled field at optimum moisture and broadcast<br />
sowing of pre-germinated seed in dry tilled<br />
irrigated conditions, while wheat was sown as<br />
conventional, zero till, broadcast in prepared<br />
seed bed and broadcast at last irrigation in<br />
paddy.<br />
30
<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
Reclamation and management of alkali soils<br />
<strong>Soil</strong> chiseling recorded higher in yields of<br />
wheatand rice by 10-15 and 4-7 per cent,<br />
respectively. During the last year, respective<br />
yield increase was 13-18 and 10-<strong>11</strong> per cent.<br />
Laser land leveling enhanced the wheat yield<br />
by 22 per cent and rice by 8-<strong>11</strong> per cent (Table 8)<br />
besides 15-18 per cent irrigation water saving in<br />
wheat this year. Passing of groundwater through<br />
gypsum beds for RSC neutralization to 2.0<br />
Table 8 : Effect of different physical, chemical and agronomic interventions on grain yield of wheat and<br />
rice<br />
Treatments<br />
Wheat yield (t ha -1 ) Rice yield (t ha -1 )<br />
PBW 550 PBW 502 DBW 17 CSR 30 PAU 201<br />
Chiseling (10.2 ha) 4.17 4.07 3.99 1.99 5.<strong>11</strong><br />
Without chiseling 3.53 3.61 3.40 1.85 4.91<br />
% increase 15 <strong>11</strong> 10 7 4<br />
Laser level (1.2 ha) 4.43 4.28 4.17 2.06 5.33<br />
Without leveling 3.42 3.31 3.34 1.91 4.77<br />
% increase 23 23 20 8 <strong>11</strong><br />
Gypsum bed use (16.8 ha) 4.52 4.33 -- 2.51 5.37<br />
Without gypsum bed 3.48 3.30 -- 2.18 4.93<br />
% increase 32 30 -- 13 8<br />
Farmers’ practice 3.43 3.28 3.<strong>11</strong> 1.97 4.65<br />
100% NPK Zn 3.97 3.76 4.02 2.09 5.20<br />
100% NPK Zn + 100% GR 4.63 4.43 4.34 2.62 5.59<br />
50%NPK+50% rice straw + 100 GR 4.21 3.82 3.86 2.01 4.87<br />
50%NPK+50% FYM + 100 GR 4.38 3.98 4.05 2.31 5.05<br />
CD (p=0.05) 0.26 0.22 0.18 0.17 0.21<br />
Table 9 : Effect of agronomic interventions on grain yield of rice and wheat<br />
Rice<br />
Wheat<br />
Rice grain yield (t ha -1 ) Wheat grain yield (t ha -1 )<br />
CSR<br />
30<br />
PAU<br />
201<br />
CSR<br />
30*<br />
PBW<br />
550<br />
PBW<br />
502<br />
DBW<br />
17<br />
PBW<br />
550*<br />
Puddled transplant Conventional 2.30 4.90 2.85 4.13 4.13 4.24 4.88<br />
Puddled transplant Broadcast in paddy 2.08 4.47 3.02 3.85 3.79 3.65 3.71<br />
Puddled transplant Zero till sowing 2.23 5.30 2.71 3.97 4.08 3.97 4.43<br />
Puddled transplant<br />
Unpuddled<br />
transplant<br />
DSR at optimum<br />
moisture<br />
BC pre-germination<br />
+ dhaincha<br />
Puddled<br />
transplant<br />
Broadcast in cult/irrg<br />
field<br />
2.<strong>11</strong> 5.15 2.88 3.90 3.75 3.79 4.05<br />
Broadcast in paddy 2.03 4.63 2.77 3.78 3.58 3.69 3.42<br />
Zero till sowing 1.40 3.67 2.24 3.75 3.83 3.80 4.30<br />
Zero till sowing 1.43 -- 1.58 3.83 -- 3.89 4.56<br />
Turboseeding in<br />
combine harvested<br />
paddy<br />
2.12 4.87 -- 4.21 4.26 4.18 --<br />
Zero till DSR Zero till sowing 1.45 3.82 1.5.9 3.86 3.76 3.94 4.42<br />
CD (p=0.05) 0.32 0.38 0.45 0.32 0.28 0.31 0.43<br />
The values with * are the yields recorded in controlled conditions in experiment at <strong>CSSRI</strong>, Karnal ; BC-Broadcasting<br />
31
Reclamation and management of alkali soils <strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
me L -1 before applying to crops had significant<br />
impact on wheat yields only.<br />
On an average, different interventions produced<br />
32 and <strong>11</strong> per cent higher grain yields of<br />
wheat and rice, respectively. Among chemical<br />
interventions, though all proved better in<br />
comparison to farmers’ practice but application of<br />
recommended (soil test basis) dose of NPK + Zn<br />
in chemical form with addition of 100 % Gypsum<br />
Requirement (GR) was found to be the best. This<br />
treatment significantly increased the grain yields<br />
of both the crops over all other treatments. It was<br />
followed by 50%NPK +50% FYM + 100% GR<br />
and 50%NPK +50% FYM + 100% GR. As far as<br />
agronomic interventions are concerned (Table<br />
9), rice yield recorded in puddle and unpuddled<br />
transplant were at par but superior over DSR<br />
(direct seeded rice) in tilled plots at optimum<br />
moisture and zero till DSR.<br />
The grain yield of wheat obtained under<br />
conventional cultivation, turboseeding in<br />
combine harvested, zero till conditions after<br />
puddle or unpuddle transplant was at par,<br />
but better than zero till sowing with seedcum-fertilizer<br />
drill under combine harvested<br />
conditions, broadcast sowing at last irrigation<br />
and broadcast sowing in cultivated and irrigated<br />
conditions. There was a net saving of water<br />
equivalent to 3 irrigations each of 3.0 cm depth<br />
in the case of DSR and unpuddle transplant in<br />
comparison to puddle transplant rice. Deeper<br />
(4-7 cm) and wider (3-5 cm) cracks in puddle<br />
fields in comparison to 2-5 cm deep and 1.5-3<br />
cm wide in unpuddle transplant, and only 1-2<br />
cm deep and < 1 cm wide in DSR were recorded<br />
at the harvest of paddy.<br />
Effect of Different Land Use System on<br />
Carbon Sequestration, <strong>Soil</strong> Physico-Chemical<br />
Properties and Capacity of these <strong>Soil</strong>s for<br />
Sustaining Crop Growth under Salt Affected<br />
<strong>Soil</strong> (P. Dey, H.S. Jat, Anil R. Chinchmalatpure<br />
and D. Burman)<br />
Yield plateau in rice-wheat system along with<br />
diminishing factor productivity is a serious<br />
problem engulfing agriculture. Identification of<br />
efficient and sustainable land use system has,<br />
therefore, assumed greater significance under<br />
these circumstances. <strong>Soil</strong> organic carbon (SOC)<br />
is an index of soil fertility and crop productivity.<br />
To determine SOC, horizon-wise soil samples<br />
from profiles were collected and compared for<br />
reclaimed sodic soil of Karnal, Haryana with<br />
that of sodic vertisol of Bharuch, Gujarat. The<br />
results showed that SOC decreases more rapidly<br />
with depth in reclaimed sodic soil than that of<br />
sodic Vertisols (Fig. 10). Since pedoturbation is<br />
a common phenomenon in sodic Vertisols, the<br />
SOC in the profile get uniformly distributed.<br />
Thus, SOC was found to be more evenly<br />
distributed in sodic Vertisols of Western part of<br />
India than that of reclaimed sodic soils of North-<br />
West Indian conditions.<br />
A pot culture experiment was conducted to study<br />
the nutrient supplying potential of soils under<br />
different land use systems with rice as a test<br />
crop. It was observed that soils are, in general,<br />
deficient in nitrogen and phosphorus and plants<br />
exhibit deficiency symptoms. Amongst different<br />
land use systems, aonla-based system was found<br />
to produce higher grain yield/pot.<br />
<strong>Soil</strong> organic matter sustainability under different<br />
systems was also estimated for the sodic Vertisols<br />
under three different land uses comprising of<br />
agriculture, woody perennials and pasture-based<br />
systems (Fig. <strong>11</strong>). Pasture-based and woody<br />
perennial based systems recorded higher value<br />
of soil organic matter sustainability than the<br />
agriculture-based systems in sodic Vertisols.<br />
The study of weed dynamics (Table 10) revealed<br />
that weed dry weight was lowest in rice-wheat<br />
system (0.33 t ha -1 ). Among different land use<br />
systems, highest weed dry weight was recorded<br />
in Casuarina (1.33 t ha -1 ), followed by Prosopisbased<br />
(1.31 t ha -1 ) and Eucalyptus-based (1.24 t<br />
ha -1 ) systems. Higher weed dynamics in original<br />
sodic land was due to less competition with any<br />
crop/trees since it is kept fallow. In general,<br />
the systems having comparatively higher<br />
canopy coverage promote more annual weeds<br />
as compared to perennials whereas, the system<br />
having lesser canopy cover promote more<br />
pernnial than annual weeds.<br />
32
<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
Reclamation and management of alkali soils<br />
Fig. 10 : Changes in soil organic carbon in reclaimed sodic soil (A) profile of Vertisol (B)<br />
Fig. <strong>11</strong> : <strong>Soil</strong> organic matter stability under different land<br />
use systems<br />
Table 10 : Weed dynamics and biomass production<br />
during kharif in different land use<br />
systems<br />
Land use<br />
systems<br />
No. of<br />
weeds m -2<br />
Fresh wt.<br />
of weeds<br />
(t ha -1 )<br />
Dry wt.<br />
of weeds<br />
(t ha -1 )<br />
Guava based 10.58 3.08 1.19<br />
Aonla based 10.41 3.66 1.15<br />
Casurina based 8 3.89 1.33<br />
Prosopis based 9.12 4.35 1.31<br />
Eucalyptus<br />
based<br />
7.85 2.80 1.24<br />
Rice-wheat 4.31 1.19 0.33<br />
Soybean-wheat 6.89 1.80 0.57<br />
Original land 10.25 5.27 2.07<br />
Integrated Nutrient Supply and Management<br />
System for Sustainable Crop Production<br />
in Alkali <strong>Soil</strong>s (N.P.S.Yaduvanshi and<br />
S.K.Chaudhari)<br />
A long-term field experiment initiated in 1994<br />
to evaluate the use of chemical fertilizers and<br />
organic manure on a gypsum amended alkali<br />
soil (pH 8.7 and ESP 18) was continued. The<br />
treatments consisted of T 1<br />
- Control (without<br />
organic and inorganic fertilizer), T 2<br />
- N 180<br />
P 22<br />
K 0<br />
Zn 5<br />
, T 3<br />
-N 180<br />
P 39<br />
K 63<br />
Zn 5<br />
, T 4<br />
-N 100<br />
P 16<br />
K 28<br />
+ moong,<br />
T 5<br />
- N 100<br />
P 16<br />
K 28<br />
+ GM before rice transplanting,<br />
T 6<br />
-N 100<br />
P 16<br />
K 28<br />
+ FYM before rice transplanting,<br />
T 7<br />
- N 100<br />
P 16<br />
K 28<br />
+ wheat straw before rice<br />
transplanting, T 8<br />
-N 100<br />
P 16<br />
K 28<br />
+ rice straw<br />
before wheat sowing, T 9<br />
-N 150<br />
P 26<br />
K 42<br />
S 30<br />
Zn 7<br />
Mn 7<br />
, T 10<br />
- N 150<br />
P 26<br />
K 42<br />
S 30<br />
Zn 7<br />
Mn 0<br />
. The experiment<br />
was conducted in randomized block design<br />
with four replications. The farm yard manure<br />
(FYM) and wheat residue were incorporated<br />
at 15 and 30 days before transplantating of<br />
rice, respectively. The green manure crop of<br />
dhaincha and moong as pulse crop were sown<br />
in-situ during May. A 50 days old sesbania crop<br />
was harvested, weighed and incorporated into<br />
the soil by power tiller. The moong crop was<br />
incorporated after two pickings. Rice cv Pusa-<br />
44 (30 days old seedlings) was transplanted<br />
in standing water in the first week of July<br />
using 2 seedlings/hill at a spacing of 20 cm x<br />
15 cm. One third of N and full doses of P and<br />
K, S, Zn and Mn were applied at the time of<br />
transplanting as per treatment. The remaining<br />
nitrogen was broadcasted in two equal splits<br />
at 3 and 6 weeks after transplanting. The crops<br />
were grown under irrigated condition.<br />
Results showed that the application of N 100<br />
P 16<br />
K 28<br />
+ green manuring or moong or FYM, N 150<br />
P 26<br />
K 42<br />
Zn 7<br />
S 30<br />
Mn 7<br />
and N 150<br />
P 26<br />
K 42<br />
Zn 7<br />
S 30<br />
Mn 0<br />
were<br />
significantly superior in comparison to farmers’<br />
practice (N 180<br />
P 22<br />
K 0<br />
Zn 5<br />
) (Table <strong>11</strong>). The highest<br />
yield was obtained with the application of N 150<br />
P 26<br />
K 42<br />
Zn 7<br />
S 30<br />
Mn 7<br />
. There was no response to K<br />
and Mn application.<br />
33
Reclamation and management of alkali soils <strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
Table <strong>11</strong> : Effect of different integrated nutrient<br />
management treatments on yield of rice<br />
and wheat<br />
Treatments<br />
Grain yield (t ha -1 )<br />
Wheat<br />
2009-10<br />
Rice <strong>2010</strong><br />
N 0<br />
P 0<br />
K 0<br />
1.96 2.26<br />
N 180<br />
P 22<br />
K0Zn 5<br />
(FP) 4.33 5.49<br />
N 180<br />
P 39<br />
K 63<br />
Zn 5<br />
4.68 5.72<br />
N 100<br />
P 16<br />
K 28<br />
+ Moong 4.72<br />
5.89 + 1.2<br />
(Moong)<br />
N 100<br />
P 16<br />
K 28<br />
+ GM 4.40 6.18<br />
N 100<br />
P 16<br />
K 28<br />
+ FYM 4.03 5.87<br />
N 100<br />
P 16<br />
K 28<br />
+ WS 4.06 5.59<br />
N 100<br />
P 16<br />
K 28<br />
+ RS 4.24 5.62<br />
N 150<br />
P 26<br />
K 42<br />
S 30<br />
Zn 7<br />
Mn 7<br />
4.51 6.35<br />
N 150<br />
P 26<br />
K 42<br />
S 30<br />
Zn 7<br />
Mn 0<br />
4.28 6.02<br />
CD (P= 0.05) 0.33 0.38<br />
FP - Farmers’ practice<br />
<strong>Soil</strong> physico-chemical properties under INM<br />
treatments<br />
Data on the effect of INM treatments on soil<br />
bulk density, hydraulic conductivity and water<br />
retention are presented in Table 12. Various<br />
INM treatments did not influence soil bulk<br />
density, saturated hydraulic conductivity and<br />
water retention at 33 kPa and 1500 kPa soilwater<br />
suction significantly after rice harvesting<br />
during <strong>2010</strong>. Three seasons’ average values<br />
revealed that the incorporation of green manure<br />
or application of FYM lowered the soil bulk<br />
density and increased the saturated hydraulic<br />
conductivity as compared with the mineral<br />
fertilizer application, though the change was<br />
statistically non-significant. Incorporation of<br />
rice and wheat straw were not equally effective<br />
as that of green manure and FYM in changing<br />
the soil bulk density and saturated hydraulic<br />
conductivity. In general, saturated hydraulic<br />
conductivity values of the bottom layer were<br />
lower than the upper layer, mainly due to<br />
depth-wise increase in the bulk density and the<br />
clay content. Incorporation of green manure<br />
and application of FYM brought considerable<br />
improvement in water retention at 33 kPa soilwater<br />
suction, which was statistically superior<br />
over mineral fertilizer application after wheat<br />
and rice <strong>2010</strong>. However, the incorporation of<br />
green manure or application of FYM slightly<br />
increased the water retention at 1500 kPa soilwater<br />
suction as compared with the mineral<br />
fertilizer application, though the change was<br />
statistically non-significant. Addition of organic<br />
sources increased soil organic carbon, available<br />
N, P, K and micronutrients (Zn, Fe, Mn and Cu)<br />
and decreased soil pH. Combining chemical and<br />
organic sources with judicious fertilizer use is<br />
the most effective strategy for maintaining soil<br />
productivity and sustaining crop yields.<br />
Maximizing rice yield through early stage<br />
nursery transplanting in partially puddled<br />
conditions<br />
The experiment was initiated with the objectives<br />
to maximize rice yield by early stage nursery<br />
transplanting with recommended practices<br />
during <strong>2010</strong>. The treatments consisted of. T 1<br />
-<br />
Recommended practice (30 days nursery), T 2<br />
-<br />
15 days nursery (without sesbania), T 3<br />
- 15 days<br />
nursery (0 day sesbania) and, T 4<br />
- 15 days nursery<br />
(7 days sesbania). Rice variety Pusa-44 nursery<br />
was sown as per treatments. Rice (30 days old<br />
seedlings) was transplanted in standing water<br />
in first week of July using 2 seedlings/hill at a<br />
spacing of 20 cm x 15 cm. The fertilizer applied<br />
at the time of transplanting as per treatments.<br />
The remaining nitrogen was broadcasted as<br />
per treatments. Transplanting of 15 days old<br />
nursery significantly increased the rice yield as<br />
compared to recommended age. Transplanting<br />
of 15 days nursery with sesbania at 0 and 7<br />
days significantly decreased the rice yield as<br />
compared to transplanting of 15 days nursery<br />
without sesbania. Transplanting of 15 days old<br />
nursery with sesbania at 7 days slightly increased<br />
the rice yield in comparison to 0 day of sesbania<br />
(Table 13).<br />
34
<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
Reclamation and management of alkali soils<br />
Table 12 : Effect of INM treatments on soil physical properties<br />
INM treatments<br />
<strong>Soil</strong> depth<br />
(cm)<br />
Bulk density<br />
(mg m -3 )<br />
Saturated<br />
hydraulic<br />
conductivity<br />
(mm h -1 )<br />
Water<br />
retention(θ v<br />
)<br />
(cm 3 cm -3 ) at<br />
33 kPa<br />
Water<br />
retention(θ v<br />
)<br />
(cm 3 cm -3 ) at<br />
1500 kPa<br />
N 0<br />
P 0<br />
K 0<br />
15-30 1.42 1.5 0.24 0.14<br />
0-15 1.42 1.7 0.23 0.16<br />
30-60 1.43 -- 0.23 0.15<br />
N 180<br />
P 22<br />
K 0<br />
Zn 5<br />
(FP)<br />
0-15 1.42 1.7 0.23 0.15<br />
15-30 1.42 1.8 0.25 0.14<br />
30-60 1.42 -- 0.24 0.16<br />
N 180<br />
P 39<br />
K 63<br />
Zn 5<br />
15-30 1.42 1.4 0.23 0.15<br />
0-15 1.41 1.7 0.22 0.15<br />
30-60 1.43 -- 0.21 0.15<br />
N 100<br />
P 16<br />
K 28<br />
+ moong<br />
0-15 1.40 1.9 0.28 0.16<br />
15-30 1.40 1.9 0.25 0.16<br />
30-60 1.40 -- 0.25 0.15<br />
0-15 1.38 2.3 0.34 0.17<br />
N 100<br />
P 16<br />
K 28<br />
+ GM<br />
15-30 1.39 2.2 0.32 0.16<br />
30-60 1.39 -- 0.33 0.15<br />
N 100<br />
P 16<br />
K 28<br />
+ FYM<br />
0-15 1.38 2.5 0.36 0.18<br />
15-30 1.38 2.4 0.36 0.17<br />
30-60 1.39 -- 0.34 0.16<br />
N 100<br />
P 16<br />
K 28<br />
+ WS<br />
0-15 1.40 2.0 0.27 0.15<br />
15-30 1.41 1.7 0.27 0.15<br />
30-60 1.42 -- 0.27 0.15<br />
N 100<br />
P 16<br />
K 28<br />
+ RS<br />
0-15 1.42 1.9 0.24 0.16<br />
15-30 1.43 1.9 0.24 0.15<br />
30-60 1.42 -- 0.23 0.15<br />
N 150<br />
P 26<br />
K 42<br />
S 30<br />
Zn 7<br />
Mn 7 15-30 1.41 1.4 0.22 0.15<br />
0-15 1.41 1.5 0.23 0.15<br />
30-60 1.42 -- 0.23 0.14<br />
N 150<br />
P 26<br />
K 42<br />
S 30<br />
Zn 7<br />
Mn 0<br />
15-30 1.41 1.3 0.23 0.15<br />
0-15 1.39 1.3 0.24 0.15<br />
30-60 1.41 -- 0.23 0.15<br />
CD(0.05) Treat. NS NS 0.<strong>11</strong> NS<br />
Depth NS NS NS NS<br />
35
Reclamation and management of alkali soils <strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
Table 13 : Effect of different treatments on yield of<br />
rice<br />
Treatments Rice yield (t ha -1 )<br />
T 1<br />
- Recommended practices<br />
(30 days nursery)<br />
T 2<br />
- 15 days nursery (without<br />
sesbania)<br />
T 3<br />
- 15 days nursery (0 day<br />
sesbania)<br />
T 4<br />
- 15 days nursery (7 days<br />
sesbania)<br />
5.05<br />
5.57<br />
4.28<br />
4.54<br />
CD (p= 0.05) 0.33<br />
Productive Utilization of Inland Sodic/Saline<br />
<strong>Soil</strong> and Water for Aquaculture in relation to<br />
Farming System <strong>Research</strong> (S.K Singh)<br />
The productivity of fish biomass based on<br />
supplementary feed (down size farm grain@1-5%<br />
of body weight of fish) from the new pond (0.1 ha)<br />
and an old pond (0.4 ha) was 2.98 and 3.86 t ha -1<br />
after one year of cultivation at 800±250 g mean<br />
weight of the species. After eighteen months of<br />
culture, the production from ponds was found<br />
to be 3.10 and 4.20 t ha -1 year -1 , respectively.<br />
The species recovery from the ponds after<br />
harvest were found in the order of Cyprinus<br />
carpio (Common carp) > Ctenopharyngodon idella<br />
(Grass carp) >Catla catla (Catla) > Labeo rohita<br />
(Rohu) > Cirrhinus mrigal (Mrigal). The major<br />
phsico-chemical and hydrobiological parameter<br />
of pond soil and water is given in the Table 14<br />
and 15. On the bund of the new pond, elephant<br />
foot yam (Zimikand) (Amorphallus paeonifolius)<br />
was grown to the level of 3-5 times of initial<br />
plantation under farming system practices in<br />
sodic soil condition along with fish culture<br />
activity in the pond. From both the ponds, the<br />
revenue of ` 83,973 was generated through<br />
Table 15 : Physico-chemical and biological<br />
parameters of the pond water<br />
Parameters New pond Old pond<br />
Pond water area (ha) 0.1 0.4<br />
Mean water depth (m) 0.90<br />
(0.75-1.25)<br />
1.2<br />
(0.85-1.60)<br />
Water transparency (cm) 10.0-18.6 6.8-24.0<br />
Water temperature ( 0 C) 10-38 10-38<br />
Water pH 7.2-9.1 7.0-9.3<br />
D.O.(mg L -1 ) 1.0-6.2 2.8-8.3<br />
Free CO 2<br />
(mg L -1 ) 0.0-20.0 0.0-16.0<br />
Alkalinity (mg L -1 ) 196-260 128-160<br />
Hardness (mg L -1 ) <strong>11</strong>0-160 88-120<br />
DOM (mg L -1 ) 2.0-4.4 3.6-6.2<br />
EC (dS m -1 ) 0.50-0.92 0.30-0.78<br />
Planktonic productivity<br />
(ml/100 L water)<br />
0.5-1.5 0.25-1.75<br />
Bottom biota (No m -2 ) Nil 0-01<br />
Fish production after<br />
18 month (t ha -1 year -1 )<br />
3.10 4.20<br />
B:C 2.70 5.60<br />
DO - Dissolved oxygen; DOM - Dissolved organic matter<br />
fish sale. The B:C for the new pond was 2.7 for<br />
fish and 2.88 (0.2ha) for vegetable cultivation,<br />
whereas overall B:C for old fish pond was 5.6.<br />
The fresh stocking of ponds with different type<br />
of carp fish fingerling (5-15g size) i.e.Catla catla<br />
(Catla), Labeo rohita (Rohu), Cirrhinus mrigala<br />
(Mrigal), Hypopthalmicthys molitrex (Silver carp),<br />
Ctenopharyngodon idella (Grass carp), Cyprinus<br />
carpio(Common carp) at the rate of 10,000 ha -1<br />
was done December, <strong>2010</strong>.<br />
Table 14 : <strong>Soil</strong> characteristics of fish ponds<br />
<strong>Soil</strong> characteristics<br />
Plot of the new<br />
pond<br />
Bottom of the<br />
new pond<br />
Marginal area of dyke<br />
of old pond<br />
Bottom of the<br />
old pond<br />
pH 8.1-9.37 7.77-7.91 7.0-8.1 7.0-7.66<br />
EC e<br />
(dS m -1 ) 0.20-0.44 0.45-0.64 0.28-0.89 0.30-0.69<br />
Organic carbon (%) 0.13-0.48 0.42-0.48 0.03-0.56 0.56-0.83<br />
36
<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
Reclamation and management of alkali soils<br />
Studies on Multi-enterprise Agriculture<br />
on Reclaimed Sodic Land for Sustaining<br />
Livelihood (Gurbachan Singh, J.C. Dagar, H.S.<br />
Jat, R.S. Tripathi, N.P.S. Yaduvanshi, Lalita<br />
Batra, P.C. Sharma, R.S. Pandey, S.K. Chaudhari,<br />
S.K. Singh, S.S. Kundu and N.S. Sirohi)<br />
A multienterprise agriculture project was<br />
initiated on 2.0 ha reclaimed alkali land at<br />
the experimental farm of <strong>CSSRI</strong>, Karnal with<br />
interdisciplinary approach to develop farming<br />
options/capsules. The project was initiated in<br />
2006 with a broad idea of sustainable use of<br />
natural resources.<br />
Multienterprise components<br />
Multienterprise agriculture model is an<br />
integration of various components grouped<br />
in two categories i.e. crop components and<br />
subsidiary components. Crop components gave<br />
the income on half yearly basis while subsidiary<br />
components generate the income on regular<br />
basis. Total revenue of ` 3,54,828 was generated<br />
in the multienterprise model after expending `<br />
1,02,357 (Table 16) resulting in a net income of<br />
` 2,52, 471. Crop components generated a net<br />
annual income of ` 1,07, 388 and subsidiary<br />
components ` 1,45,083. Subsidiary components<br />
generated a daily net income of ` 397 with an<br />
expenditure of ` 201.<br />
Crop components<br />
The profitability of different crops under crop<br />
components was worked out on the basis of<br />
minimum support price of marketable produce<br />
for the year 2009-10 (Table 17). Horticulture<br />
and fodder-based systems were found to be<br />
more remunerative than other crop production<br />
systems. In horticulture production system,<br />
the highest net income of ` 1,10,316 ha -1 was<br />
recorded with a B:C of 5.35 followed by vegetable<br />
production system (` 80,683 ha -1 ). However, the<br />
lowest return was recorded with floriculture<br />
production system (` 37,202 ha -1 ) with a B:C<br />
ratio of 1.83.<br />
In case of grain production, the highest system<br />
productivity in terms of rice equivalent yield<br />
(9.74 t ha -1 ) was recorded by rice-wheat and<br />
maize-wheat-moong cropping systems with a<br />
B:C of 3.87 and 3.15, respectively. However, the<br />
highest net income (` 74,596 ha -1 ) was observed<br />
with rice-wheat cropping system (Table 18).<br />
The lowest rice equivalent yield (6.24 t ha -1 )<br />
was observed with soybean-maize cropping<br />
system with a net return of ` 43,565 ha -1 . Under<br />
grain production components, rice-wheat and<br />
maize-wheat-moong cropping systems were<br />
compatible with each other and profitable in<br />
comparison to other cropping systems.<br />
Subsidiary components<br />
Milk production unit could be considered as<br />
‘core unit’ of multienterprise, which gave regular<br />
income (` 10216 month -1 ) and employment to<br />
the farmer’s family. Average monthly milk<br />
productions from animals are presented in<br />
Fig 12. The variation in milk production was<br />
governed by the lactation period of the animals.<br />
In the month of December, highest milk (790 L)<br />
was produced, whereas lowest milk production<br />
(33 L) was recorded in the month of July <strong>2010</strong>.<br />
A good volume of milk (414 L month -1 ) was<br />
recorded throughout the year. The highest net<br />
income (` 2,54,871 2ha -1 ) was recorded with<br />
multienterprise agriculture model with a B:C<br />
ratio of 2.47 closely followed by horticulture<br />
based production system (` 2,20,633 2ha -1 ) with<br />
a B:C of 5.35. Horticulture based system in<br />
which the vegetable crops were grown with the<br />
fruit plants of guava proved to be economic and<br />
highly beneficial to the farmers.<br />
Fig 12 : Monthly trend s of milk production (L m -1 )<br />
during the year (<strong>2010</strong> )<br />
37
Reclamation and management of alkali soils <strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
Table 16 : Revenue generation, expenditure and net income in multienterprise agriculture model<br />
Multi-enterprise components<br />
Revenue<br />
generation (`)<br />
Expenditure<br />
(`)<br />
Net<br />
income (`)<br />
B:C<br />
ratio<br />
Crop Components<br />
Fodder production - 0.4 ha 21712 3585 18127 5.06<br />
Grain production- 0.8 ha 56775 13155 43621 3.32<br />
Floriculture production-0.2 ha <strong>11</strong>5<strong>11</strong> 4071 7440 1.83<br />
Horticulture based-0.2 ha 26190 4126 22063 5.35<br />
Vegetable production- 0.2 ha 20020 3883 16137 4.16<br />
Sub-total 136208 (373) 28820 (79) 107388 (294) 3.73<br />
Subsidiary Components<br />
Milk + compost + biogas 135271 38127 97144 2.55<br />
Fruits & vegetables on pond dykes 23476 2400 21076 8.78<br />
Fish 27527 1500 26027 17.35<br />
Poultry & ducks 29326 30<strong>11</strong>0 -784 -<br />
Mushroom 1500 1200 300 0.25<br />
Bee-keeping 1520 200 1320 6.90<br />
Sub total 218620 (599) 73537 (201) 145083 (397) 1.97<br />
Total 354828 (972) 102357 (280) 252471 (692) 2.47<br />
Note : Figures in parenthesis indicate per day income<br />
Table 17 : Economics of different crop components grown<br />
Crop Components<br />
Gross income<br />
(` ha -1 )<br />
Operational cost<br />
(` ha -1 )<br />
Net income<br />
(` ha -1 )<br />
Fodder production 54280.00 8962.00 45318.00<br />
Grain production 70969.25 16443.50 54525.75<br />
Floriculture production 57556.92 20354.50 37202.42<br />
Horticulture based 130947.50 20631.00 <strong>11</strong>0316.50<br />
Vegetable production 100100.00 19416.90 80683.10<br />
Horticulture + vegetable system<br />
Wheat crop<br />
38
<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
Reclamation and management of alkali soils<br />
Table 18 : Productivity and profitability of different cropping systems in multi-enterprise agriculture<br />
Cropping systems<br />
Productivity<br />
(t ha -1 )<br />
Operational<br />
cost<br />
(` ha -1 )<br />
Gross<br />
income<br />
(` ha -1 )<br />
Net<br />
income<br />
(` ha -1 )<br />
B:C<br />
ratio<br />
Rice<br />
equivalent<br />
yield (t ha -1 )<br />
Rice-wheat 9.32 19274 93870 74596 3.87 9.74<br />
Rice 5.22 9806 49590 39784 4.06 5.22<br />
Wheat 4.10 9468 44280 34812 3.68 4.52<br />
Moong-maizewheat<br />
9.28 23014 95490 72476 3.15 9.74<br />
Moong 0.40 3769 <strong>11</strong>040 7271 3.51 1.13<br />
Maize 4.75 8845 39900 31055 3.51 4.07<br />
wheat 4.13 10400 44550 34150 3.28 4.55<br />
Soybean-maize 6.28 17602 6<strong>11</strong>67 43565 2.48 6.24<br />
Soybean 1.53 8203 21267 13064 1.59 2.17<br />
Maize 4.75 9400 39900 30500 3.24 4.07<br />
Pigeonpea-maize 1.45+37.5* 13749 70850 57101 4.22 7.23<br />
Maize (fodder) 37.50 7864 37500 29636 3.77 3.83<br />
Pigeonpea 1.45 5885 33350 27465 4.67 3.40<br />
*Fodder yield<br />
Recycling of FYM within the system<br />
About 43.46 t of cow dung was obtained from 5-6<br />
animals during the study period. Out of which,<br />
15.93 t was used for generating biogas, 26.89 t<br />
for composting, 0.13 t for vermi-composting and<br />
0.52 t was added to the fish pond as fish feed.<br />
The dung used in biogas plant, after production<br />
of biogas, was also added into the compost pits.<br />
A major part of urine of animals was added<br />
directly into the fish pond.<br />
<strong>Soil</strong> biological quality<br />
After 3 years of cropping, greater microbial<br />
biomass carbon microbial nitrogen flush<br />
and dehydrogenase activity was observed<br />
under sorghum-berseem (268.6, 19.6 and 59.9,<br />
respectively) cropping system as compared<br />
to all other systems (Table 19). However, acid<br />
phosphatase activity was higher (184.5) in ricewheat<br />
cropping system. This indicates that the<br />
fodder production component is highly efficient<br />
in providing suitable micro climate to microorganisms.<br />
The lowest microbial nitrogen (16.5<br />
mg kg -1 ) and dehydrogenase activity (21.2 µg<br />
TPF g -1 soil) was observed under floriculture<br />
production system.<br />
Fish production and water quality of pond<br />
The ongoing experimental trial for rearing<br />
of different type of fish fingerlings viz;Catla<br />
catla (Catla), Labeo rohita (Rohu), Cirrhinus<br />
mrigala (Mrigal), Ctenopharyngodon idella (Grass<br />
carp), Cyprinus carpio (Common carp) was<br />
undertaken in this pond model (0.2 ha). Post<br />
stocking management of the pond in relation to<br />
multienterprise agriculture was done for natural<br />
productivity in terms of pond fertilization<br />
mainly with duck droppings and cow dung<br />
generated in the model. The fresh stocking of<br />
pond with different type of carp fish fingerling<br />
(10-15g size) @ 10,000 ha -1 was done during the<br />
period under report. The fish productivity after<br />
39
Reclamation and management of alkali soils <strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
Table 19 : Microbial properties under different production systems of crop components<br />
Cropping systems<br />
Microbial<br />
biomass<br />
carbon<br />
(mg kg -1 )<br />
Microbial<br />
nitrogen<br />
flush<br />
(mg kg -1 )<br />
Dehydrogenase<br />
activity<br />
(µg TPF g -1 soil)<br />
Acid<br />
phosphatase<br />
activity<br />
(µg PNP g -1<br />
soil)<br />
Grain production (Rice-Wheat) 255.6 ± 40.6 18.5 ± 3.2 24.6 + 3.2 184.5 + 12.5<br />
Fodder production (Sorghumberseem)<br />
Horticulture production (Guava+<br />
Banana + tomato + Bhindi)<br />
Vegetable production (Bottle guard -<br />
Cauliflower)<br />
Floriculture production (Baby corn -<br />
marigold - gladiolus)<br />
268.6 ± 23.5 19.6 ± 3.6 59.9 + 6.0 91.3 + 7.7<br />
180.2 ± 15.6 18.9 ± 2.2 21.9 + 2.4 121.6 + 16.2<br />
179.5 ± 25.2 17.6 ± 3.9 24.6 + 3.5 105.7 + 15.4<br />
194.8 ± 19.1 16.5 ± 1.9 21.2 + 2.6 134.4 + 9.2<br />
one year cultivation, at the level 750± 250g mean<br />
weight of the overall species from the pond, was<br />
3.5 t ha -1 and finally after eighteen months at the<br />
level of 3.58 t ha -1 year -1 . The species recovery<br />
from the ponds after harvest were found in the<br />
order of Cyprinus carpio > Ctenopharyngodon idella<br />
> Catla catla > Labeo rohita > Cirrhinus mrigal. The<br />
major physico-chemical and hydrobiological<br />
parameters of pond soil and water are given in<br />
Table 20 and 21.<br />
Table 20 : <strong>Soil</strong> parameters of multienterprise pond<br />
Marginal area Bottom area<br />
Parameters<br />
of pond of pond<br />
<strong>Soil</strong> pH 7.92-9.74 7.54-7.79<br />
EC (dS m -1 ) 0.28-1.05 0.48-0.94<br />
Organic<br />
carbon (%)<br />
0.10-0.50 0.35-1.53<br />
Multienterprise model generates employment<br />
for the farmers’ family and provide regular<br />
income of ` 397 day -1 from the subsidiary<br />
components in addition to seasonal income<br />
from crop components.<br />
Table 21 : Physico-chemical and biological<br />
parameters of water<br />
Parameters<br />
Values<br />
Pond water area (ha) 0.2<br />
Mean water depth (m) 1.25 (0.9-1.5)<br />
Water transparency (cm) 8.0-16.0<br />
Water temperature ( 0 C) 10-38<br />
Water pH 7.0-9.0<br />
D.O.(mg L -l ) 1.5-7.2<br />
Free CO 2<br />
(mg L -l ) 0.0-12.0<br />
Alkalinity (mg L -l ) 210-280<br />
Hardness (mg L -l ) 130-200<br />
DOM (mg L -l ) 4.0-8.0<br />
EC(dS m -1 ) 0.63-0.82<br />
Planktonic productivity<br />
(ml100 -l water)<br />
0.5-2.0<br />
Bottom biota (No m -2 ) 01<br />
Fish production after eighteen<br />
month (t ha -1 year -1 )<br />
3.58<br />
B:C 5.8<br />
<br />
40
<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
MANAGEMENT OF WATER LOGGING/SALINE SOILS<br />
Guidance in Identification of Problem Areas<br />
and Design and Evaluation of Subsurface<br />
Drainage Projects in Haryana (S.K. Gupta, Anil R.<br />
Chinchmalatpure, R.S. Tripathi and R.L. Meena)<br />
Pump-cum-gravity outlet<br />
For minimizing the cost of pumping, gravitycum-pumped<br />
outlets have been provided at<br />
few places wherever technically feasible. A<br />
desk study revealed that under the prevailing<br />
water-table conditions in the Beri area as much<br />
as 75 per cent of the cost of pumping could be<br />
saved with this provision (Table 22). In fact,<br />
with such a system, there would be no need to<br />
pump for water and salt balance purposes as the<br />
requirement could be fully met with the gravity<br />
flow. Pumping for irrigation purpose would only<br />
be needed for which farmers have no hesitation<br />
in investing on pump and operational cost.<br />
Modelling water-table, salinization and<br />
desalinization<br />
Wasim model was used to assess the post<br />
drainage situation of the water-table under wet<br />
(25% above normal rainfall), normal and dry<br />
rainfall (25% below normal rainfalls) years. Two<br />
years data for each case were used assuming<br />
that 2 years of above normal rainfall would be<br />
followed by 2 years of normal (485 mm) and 2<br />
years of below normal rainfall. The predictions<br />
shown in Fig. 13 revealed that at no time water<br />
table reaches 30 cm below the ground level with<br />
drainage provision. Since, the total rainfall and<br />
rainfall storms determine the rise of the watertable,<br />
water-table in normal and above normal<br />
rainfall for this particular case were not very<br />
different. However, the water-table during dry<br />
years remained lower than normal or above<br />
Table 22 : Variation of discharge through orifice at different heads and volume drained by gravity and<br />
pumping<br />
Months Water<br />
table<br />
depth<br />
(Av.<br />
2004-07)<br />
(cm)<br />
Depth<br />
of<br />
orifice<br />
(cm)<br />
Height<br />
above<br />
orifice<br />
(cm)<br />
Diameter<br />
of orifice<br />
(cm)<br />
Discharge<br />
through<br />
orifice<br />
(L s -1 )<br />
Discharge<br />
through<br />
pumping<br />
(L s -1 )<br />
Volume<br />
drained by<br />
pump per<br />
day (m 3<br />
day -1 ) (8h<br />
day -1 )<br />
Volume<br />
drained<br />
by orifice<br />
(m 3 day -1 )<br />
(24h day -1 )<br />
Jan 50.0 65.0 15.0 7.2 4.3 10.0 288.0 367.9<br />
Feb 55.0 65.0 10.0 7.2 3.5 10.0 288.0 300.4<br />
Mar 50.0 65.0 15.0 7.2 4.3 10.0 288.0 367.9<br />
Apr 65.0 65.0 0.0 7.2 0.0 10.0 288.0 0.0<br />
May 73.0 65.0 0.0 7.2 0.0 10.0 288.0 0.0<br />
Jun 80.0 65.0 0.0 7.2 0.0 10.0 288.0 0.0<br />
Jul 63.0 65.0 2.0 7.2 1.6 10.0 288.0 134.4<br />
Aug 54.0 65.0 <strong>11</strong>.0 7.2 3.6 10.0 288.0 101.6 *<br />
Sep 41.0 65.0 24.0 7.2 5.4 10.0 288.0 155.1 *<br />
Oct 36.0 65.0 29.0 7.2 5.9 10.0 288.0 165.0 *<br />
Nov 37.0 65.0 28.0 7.2 5.8 10.0 288.0 502.7<br />
Dec 38.0 65.0 27.0 7.2 5.7 10.0 288.0 493.6<br />
Total 642.0 780.0 161.0 86.4 40.0 120.0 3456.0 2588.8<br />
Average 53.5 65.0 13.4 7.2 3.3 10.0 288.0 215.7<br />
*submerged orifice for 20 days<br />
41
Management of water logging/saline soils <strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
pre-sowing irrigation on short-term basis.<br />
However, over the long-term, above normal<br />
rainfall would take care of salinity build-up.<br />
Fig. 13 : Groundwater table behaviour in wet, normal<br />
and dry years under drainage<br />
normal rainfall years. It appears that under the<br />
drainage situation, chances of aeration problem<br />
are quite less.<br />
Although, the provision of drainage helps in<br />
reclaiming the land but reuse of drainage effluent<br />
for crop production during the rabi season may<br />
cause soil salinization. On the other hand,<br />
desalinization would occur during the monsoon<br />
season. To see the variation in soil salinity under<br />
this situation, a case study was prepared for the<br />
wheat crop wherein saline water (5 dS m -1 ) was<br />
used to apply 4 irrigations following pre-sowing<br />
irrigation with fresh water. The soil salinity at<br />
the time of wheat harvest reached at a level of 2.5<br />
dS m -1 (EC 2<br />
), which is not detrimental to wheat<br />
crop at this stage. The soil salinity remained at<br />
that level and decreased with on-set of monsoon<br />
season (Fig. 14). Several combinations of such<br />
exercises revealed that :<br />
There is no build-up of soil salinity on a longterm<br />
basis<br />
<strong>Salinity</strong> build-up on year-to-year basis may<br />
occur depending upon the amount of rainfall.<br />
This may be taken care of by applying a heavy<br />
Fig.14 : <strong>Soil</strong> salinization and desalinization in saline<br />
water irrigated land with subsurface drainage<br />
From these studies, it could be concluded that<br />
drainage helped in controlling the water- table<br />
and facilitated the reuse of drainage water.<br />
Besides, it is also concluded that Wasim Model<br />
could be used in monitoring and evaluation<br />
of various management options that could<br />
be applied to manage drained lands to get<br />
maximum advantage of land drainage with<br />
minimum cost.<br />
Farmers’ Participatory Action <strong>Research</strong><br />
Programme (FPARP) on Enhancing<br />
Groundwater Recharge and Water Productivity<br />
(S.K. Kamra, Satyendra Kumar, R.K. Yadav,<br />
Sharad K. Singh, Pragati Maity, Ram Ajore,<br />
Gurbachan Singh)<br />
The sustainability of agriculture in northwestern<br />
states is threatened due to alarming<br />
decline of water-table, increase in pumping cost<br />
and deterioration in groundwater quality. The<br />
groundwater decline can be deferred to some<br />
extent by enhancing artificial recharge using<br />
rain and excess canal water through surface<br />
spreading and well injection techniques. It helps<br />
in utilizing flood water that otherwise goes<br />
waste or causes damage to standing crops and<br />
also in improving groundwater quality. Well<br />
injection techniques are getting accepted due to<br />
failure or delay in arrival of natural or artificially<br />
recharged water to deeper aquifer zones with<br />
surface methods.<br />
Farmers’ Participatory Action <strong>Research</strong><br />
Programme (FPARP) on Enhancing<br />
Groundwater Recharge and Water Productivity<br />
was continued at <strong>CSSRI</strong>, Karnal and Regional<br />
<strong>Research</strong> Stations, Bharuch and Lucknow<br />
during <strong>2010</strong>. During this period, innovative<br />
groundwater recharge, pond renovation,<br />
integrated farming systems, laser leveling<br />
technologies and irrigation interventions have<br />
been implemented at 93 village sites in Haryana,<br />
Punjab, Uttar Pradesh and Gujarat. These<br />
include injection well type recharge structures<br />
installed and evaluated at 52 farmers’ fields (32<br />
42
<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
Management of water logging/saline soils<br />
in Haryana, 5 in Punjab, 3 in Uttar Pradesh and<br />
12 in Gujarat). These are based on well injection<br />
technique and involve passing of excess rain<br />
and canal water under gravity through a bore<br />
well to subsurface sandy zones coupled to a<br />
recharge filter consisting of layers of coarse<br />
sand, small gravel and boulders in a small brick<br />
masonry chamber. Design features of recharge<br />
structures installed in Haryana and Punjab have<br />
been discussed in earlier reports, broad feature<br />
and cost of main technologies/interventions for<br />
whole project are summarized in Table 23.<br />
Individual farmers can construct recharge<br />
structures at any low lying location where<br />
runoff gets accumulated and adversely affects<br />
the production of rice during monsoon rains<br />
and of wheat during occasional winter rains.<br />
The temporal changes in depth, EC and RSC<br />
of groundwater at two representative sites in<br />
Haryana are presented in Fig. 15. It is seen that<br />
recharge events, indicated by arrows, cause both<br />
a rise in water-table depth and reduction in EC<br />
and sometimes also of RSC of groundwater.<br />
The capital investment cost has been worked<br />
out @ ` 3.5 to Rs. 2.1 m -3 recharge water for<br />
locations collecting runoff from 12- 20 ha area.<br />
The recharge structures, with intake rate of 4-6<br />
litre sec -1 , have proven highly effective in these<br />
states in augmenting groundwater, improving<br />
Table 23 : Features of recharge structures and<br />
interventions<br />
Structure<br />
Depth<br />
(m)<br />
Thickness<br />
of sandy<br />
layers (m)<br />
Cost<br />
(`)<br />
Recharge shaft 30- 46 10- 18<br />
35000-<br />
48000<br />
Recharge cavity 40- 55 NA<br />
35000-<br />
45000<br />
Recharge cavitycum<br />
- strainer well<br />
50 25 55000-<br />
58000<br />
Recharge well 25- 45 15- 18<br />
Laser leveling and<br />
improved irrigation<br />
methods<br />
Pond renovation - -<br />
22000-<br />
31000<br />
- - 4000-<br />
5000/ha<br />
10000-<br />
20000<br />
Fig. 15 : Temporal changes in depth, EC and RSC of<br />
groundwater at two recharge sites (Dera<br />
Yatriwala and Dera Gujran) in Haryana<br />
its quality (salinity, alkalinity and fluoride<br />
concentration) and enhancing farmers’ income<br />
by saving submerged crops by recharge of<br />
excess water. The recharging of water resulted<br />
in 0.6- 3.3 m and 0.3 to 3.3 m rise in water table<br />
at different sites in Haryana and Punjab during<br />
rainy seasons of 2009 and <strong>2010</strong>, respectively.<br />
The corresponding reduction in salinity and<br />
RSC of groundwater at different sites ranged<br />
from 0.2-2.4 and 0.1- 0.8 dS m -1 and 0-6.6 and<br />
0-8.3, respectively during these two years.<br />
The payback period of 30- 45 m deep recharge<br />
structures, costing ` 30,000- 50,000, has been<br />
estimated to be 1-2 years only. Similarly,<br />
recharge through recharge wells in alluvial and<br />
rocky regions of Bharuch district of Gujarat<br />
resulted in prolonged availability and reduction<br />
in groundwater salinity and consequent, 15 to 40<br />
per cent increase in income from fruit (banana,<br />
papaya and mango) plantations. Further,<br />
recharge of excess canal water through recharge<br />
cavities at 3 sites in Unnao district of UP reduced<br />
fluoride concentration of groundwater from 2.0<br />
ppm to 1.2 ppm, i.e below prescribed limit of 1.5<br />
ppm for drinking water.<br />
Field and lab studies are in progress to devise<br />
improved designs of recharge filters, including<br />
radial and biological filters to minimize clogging<br />
problem. Thickness of upper sand layer of<br />
43
Management of water logging/saline soils <strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
Groundwater recharge structures recharging excess rainwater and saving submerged crops at two sites in Haryana<br />
recharge filter has been found to be a primary<br />
factor influencing clogging, while size of gravel<br />
in the middle layer also controls effectiveness of<br />
sand as a filter.<br />
Laser levelling was implemented at 25 sites<br />
in Haryana, Punjab and Uttar Pradesh.<br />
Comparative studies on the depth and uniformity<br />
of water application and crop yields in one acre<br />
conventionally leveled and laser leveled fields at<br />
selected sites in Haryana indicated that the laser<br />
leveling is an effective technology that can save<br />
upto 20 per cent irrigation water requirement<br />
and increase yield and water productivity of<br />
both rice and wheat by about 10 and 35 per cent,<br />
respectively resulting in an annual increase of<br />
income by ` 10,910 (Table 24).<br />
Table 24 : Increase in water productivity in laser<br />
leveled over conventionally leveled<br />
fields (Av. of 6 demonstrations in<br />
farmers’ fields in Karnal district)<br />
Parameter Rice Wheat<br />
Saving in irrigation water (%) 18.6 21.1<br />
Increase in yield (%) 8.3 <strong>11</strong>.0<br />
Per cent increase in water<br />
productivity (kg m -3 of applied 34.6 37.6<br />
water)<br />
Per cent increase in water<br />
productivity (` m -3 of applied 4.7 5.9<br />
water)<br />
Increase in income (` ha -1 ) 5,040 5,870<br />
Total ` 10,910<br />
Saline aquaculture demonstration studies were<br />
also conducted in 0.2 ha size pond at one site<br />
(Jagsi, Distt Sonipat). The results indicated good<br />
scope of fish species like Catla, Rahu, Mrigal,<br />
grasscarp and commoncarp in waterlogged<br />
saline ground water using water of 2.5 dS m -1<br />
salinity. With in a period of eight months, the<br />
size of above fishes increased from 5 g to 400-<br />
600 g. Erosion of pond dyke due to heavy rain<br />
was observed to be a constraint for aquaculture<br />
in waterlogged saline areas.<br />
Integrated Filtering System for Artificial<br />
Groundwater Recharge (Satyendra Kumar, S.K.<br />
Kamra and R.K. Yadav)<br />
A study is in progress to design a efficient<br />
filtering system for groundwater recharge<br />
structures. The specific aim of this research was<br />
to determine the filtration efficiency of coarse<br />
grained filter media used in artificial recharge<br />
structure, and to evaluate the effects of their use<br />
on the quantity and quality of water recharged.<br />
A circular PVC column (22.5 cm dia and 120<br />
cm height) was fabricated for the laboratory<br />
experiment with inflow and outflow fittings.<br />
PVC pipes of 1.25 cm diameter, perforated<br />
half portion i.e. in half circle were fixed at<br />
different intervals in the column to sample<br />
the flowingwater from different depths of<br />
filtering medium for studying the movement of<br />
sediments within the medium (Fig. 16). At the<br />
bottom of the column, two concentric collectors<br />
were provided for passing the filtrate from<br />
filtering medium, while filtrate moved along<br />
with sides of the column collected by the outer<br />
collector and that water was not considered for<br />
44
<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
Management of water logging/saline soils<br />
Fig. 16: PVC column used in the laboratory study<br />
further analysis. Gravel, boulder and coarse<br />
sand (CS) was used as filtering medium. Since,<br />
finer particles i.e. CS is encountered first, it is<br />
responsible for retaining the physical impurities<br />
carried with runoff water. Therefore, different<br />
particle size of CS with varying thickness of<br />
filtering medium were prepared and evaluated.<br />
Three particle sizes of CS viz;(T 1<br />
) 0.35-0.51,<br />
(T 2<br />
) 0.5-0.7, (T 3<br />
) 0.7-1.0 mm were used in<br />
this experiment. The gradation curve for the<br />
materials used in laboratory study is presented<br />
in Fig. 17. In T 3<br />
, about 90 per cent of CS particles<br />
were more than 0.5 mm in diameter, while it<br />
was about 80 per cent in T 2<br />
. In filtering medium<br />
T 1<br />
, 20 per cent CS particles were 0.35 mm or less<br />
in diameter.<br />
The varying sediment concentrations ranging<br />
from 250 to 3000 mg L -1 were prepared by<br />
Fig. 17 : Gradation curve for material used as filtering<br />
medium and base material (soil)<br />
collecting the surface soil from the farmer’s field<br />
where recharge structure had been installed.<br />
<strong>Soil</strong>s were dried, sieved (0.2 mm) and used as<br />
the suspended sediment material for testing<br />
of vertical filter. Further, the sieved particles<br />
were weighted and the designed levels of<br />
concentration were prepared. Tap water was<br />
passed through filtering medium for 10 minutes<br />
before conducting the test run with different<br />
sediment concentration of water, so that filtering<br />
medium is clean. The laboratory study revealed<br />
that performance of filter depends upon particle<br />
size of coarse sand (CS) and influent sediment<br />
load. It was observed that removal efficiency<br />
(RE) of the medium increased with the thickness<br />
of CS bed and decreasing sediment load of<br />
influent. Similar trend was found with all three<br />
CS medium. CS medium T 1<br />
recorded 80 per cent<br />
RE for all the sediment loads except 3000 ppm<br />
at 10 cm out let. It indicates that about 80 per<br />
cent suspended load of influent was retained by<br />
top 10 cm CS bed and retention reached to more<br />
than 90 per cent after traveling 15 cm within<br />
the medium. However, removal efficiency was<br />
fewer with CS medium T 2<br />
and T 3<br />
. The same RE<br />
was recorded with 40 and 50 cm depth of CS in<br />
T 2<br />
and T 3<br />
, respectively. Lab study also indicated<br />
that filtration rate gradually decreased with the<br />
increase in suspended solids of influent water<br />
(Fig 18). Although, declining rate was sharp in<br />
the medium of greater particle size (T 3<br />
), but,<br />
the rate was recorded substantially higher than<br />
the others. It indicates that clogging was slow<br />
in the coarse medium. Hence, if CS medium<br />
of greater particle size (0.7-1.0 mm) is used in<br />
filtering unit that can work satisfactorily for the<br />
longer period compared to the others. The slope<br />
of the line (Fig. 19) decreased with decreasing<br />
sediment load. It shows that filtering media<br />
performed better with lower concentration of<br />
influent. It can be concluded that performance<br />
of vertical filtering medium can be improved<br />
either by using coarser particles of sand with<br />
greater thickness or by providing sedimentation<br />
facility before the CS bed to reduce the sediment<br />
load to a possible low level.<br />
45
Management of water logging/saline soils <strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
Fig. 18: Effect of Thickness of sand bed on removal efficiency for different particle size of filtering media<br />
Fig.19 : Effect of particle size of coarse sand (CS) and sediment load on filtration rate<br />
Performance Study of Subsurface Microirrigation<br />
for Horticultural Crops (fruits) using<br />
Domestic Wastewater (R.S. Pandey, Lalita<br />
Batra, S.K. Gupta and Ali Qadar)<br />
The research work on use of sewage water<br />
with drip irrigation for fruit crops, initiated in<br />
2006, was continued. The study was carried out<br />
with two treatments i.e. drip irrigation with<br />
(i) sewage water and (ii) good quality water.<br />
Three fruit crops are being cultivated i.e. aonla<br />
and guava as main fruit crops with inter crop<br />
papaya. The pressure compensating drippers<br />
were installed at 40 cm depth having discharge<br />
rate of 4 L h -1 and four emitters were provided<br />
for each guava and aonla plant. During the<br />
year, the study was conducted on three basic<br />
aspects. i.e. back pressure, clogging of emitters<br />
and plant performance. In the back pressure<br />
study, the emphasis was given on the effect of<br />
backpressure on emitter performance and their<br />
selection criteria. During backpressure, there<br />
is a reduction in net pressure due to pressure<br />
generated by the soil media. The manufacturing<br />
coefficients of variation of the emitters, which<br />
was non-pressure compensating and utilized<br />
during vegetable production during 2003-06,<br />
were analyzed for this purpose (Table 25). Data<br />
revealed that these emitters are better suited for<br />
the backpressure as manufacturing coefficient<br />
of variation increased with the applied pressure.<br />
Here, the nominal discharge rate pressure was<br />
1.0 kg cm - ² and manufacturing coefficient of<br />
variation was less at 0.60 kg cm - ² pressure having<br />
value of 0.0514 compared to higher pressure i.e.<br />
1.5 kg cm - ², having the value of 0.0928 above the<br />
nominal discharge rate pressure.<br />
In fruit crops, plant spacing is wide, which<br />
require clubbing of the emitters to increase the<br />
discharge rate. In the present case, the plant-to-<br />
46
<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
Management of water logging/saline soils<br />
Guava plant of 4 years age along with inter fruit tree<br />
papaya<br />
Table 25 : Change in manufacturing coefficient<br />
of variation of drippers with applied<br />
pressure and discharge rate in laterals<br />
Pressure in<br />
lateral pipe<br />
(kg cm ‐ ²)<br />
Mean<br />
discharge<br />
rate of<br />
emitters<br />
(L h -1 )<br />
Manufacturing<br />
coefficient of<br />
variation<br />
0.60 3.44 0.0514<br />
1.00 3.87 0.0827<br />
1.50 4.86 0.0928<br />
2.00 6.04 0.1038<br />
Aonla plant of 4 years age along with inter fruit tree<br />
papaya<br />
plant spacing of the guava and aonla was 4.5 m<br />
and row to row spacing was 6.0 m. In the case of<br />
Papaya, plant-to-plant and row-to-row spacing<br />
was 1.5 m. Data on the grouping of the amitters<br />
on discharge uniformity under surface and subsurface<br />
drip are presented in Table 26 and 27.<br />
It appears that there was decrease in coefficient<br />
of variation while clubbing higher number<br />
of emitters thus increasing the uniformity<br />
coefficient under both surface and subsurface<br />
drip irrigation systems. In the plant performance<br />
study, the plant height, shaded area, girth<br />
and yield of aonla and guava were monitored<br />
and analyzed. There was large variability in<br />
Table 26 : Effect of grouping of the emitters on uniformity of discharge rate in surface drip irrigation<br />
No. of<br />
emitters<br />
clubbed<br />
Average<br />
discharge rate of<br />
the emitters<br />
(L h -1 )<br />
Manufacturing<br />
coefficient of<br />
variation<br />
Average<br />
discharge rate<br />
of emitters after<br />
3 years use<br />
(L h -1 )<br />
Coefficient of<br />
variation of<br />
emitters after 3<br />
years use<br />
Uniformity<br />
coefficient<br />
(%)<br />
1 3.87 0.077 3.89 0.330 68.0<br />
2 7.74 0.052 7.78 0.197 80.0<br />
3 <strong>11</strong>.61 0.047 <strong>11</strong>.67 0.159 84.0<br />
Table 27 : Effect of grouping of the emitters on uniformity of discharge rate in subsurface drip irrigation<br />
No. of<br />
emitters<br />
clubbed<br />
Average discharge<br />
rate of the emitters<br />
(L h -1 )<br />
Manufacturing<br />
coefficient of<br />
variation<br />
Average<br />
discharge rate<br />
of the emitters<br />
after 3 years use<br />
(L h -1 )<br />
Coefficient of<br />
variation of<br />
emitters after 3<br />
years use<br />
Uniformity<br />
coefficient<br />
(%)<br />
1 3.85 0.078 3.78 0.170 83.00<br />
2 7.70 0.052 7.56 0.<strong>11</strong>4 88.60<br />
3 <strong>11</strong>.55 0.047 <strong>11</strong>.34 0.128 87.40<br />
47
Management of water logging/saline soils <strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
shaded area affecting planning of the amount of<br />
irrigation, which needs consideration.<br />
Decision Support System for Enhancing<br />
Productivity in Irrigated Saline Environment<br />
using Remote Sensing, Modelling and GIS<br />
(D.S. Bundela, S.K. Gupta, Madhurama Sethi,<br />
R.L. Meena, N.P.S. Yaduvanshi and R.S.<br />
Tripathi)<br />
An irri-agro informatics database of the<br />
Western Yamuna Canal (WYC) command<br />
was updated for new distributaries and water<br />
courses. Canal information extracted from<br />
recent remote sensing inputs and supply data.<br />
The geo-database was used for identification<br />
and delineation of the area of low productivity<br />
in the WYC command using GIS methodology<br />
based on canal supplies, groundwater quality,<br />
salt affected soils and satellite derived<br />
vegetation index (NDVI), salinity index (NDSI)<br />
and waterlogging index (NSWI) (Fig. 20). It<br />
was found that the area affected with low<br />
productivity is 988 sq km (7.24% of the command)<br />
(Fig. 21). For intensive study, low productivity<br />
areas were selected in the command of the<br />
Butana branch (Fig. 22a). The crop production<br />
constraints in irrigated saline environment were<br />
identified and the suitable best management<br />
practices (BMPs) were suggested for enhancing<br />
wheat yield in the mid and tail reaches of the<br />
Butana distributary. Poor irrigation practices<br />
and inadequate conjunctive use of multi quality<br />
waters were the main constraints resulting in<br />
low crop yield as well as low to moderate soil<br />
salinity built-up. Twelve field demonstrations<br />
Fig.20 : Methodology for identification of area of low<br />
productivity<br />
Fig.21 : Area of low productivity in the WYC Command<br />
(a)<br />
(b)<br />
Fig. 22 a & b: Area of low productivity and location of 12<br />
field demonstrations in Butana distributary.<br />
(Fig. 22 b and Table 28 and 29) were conducted at<br />
farmers’ fields in Sonipat and Rohtak districts to<br />
induce confidence in farmers for quick adoption<br />
of developed practices for growing good crop<br />
in low productivity area. The results would be<br />
reported after the wheat harvest.<br />
A system architecture of DSS (decision support<br />
system) for the WYC command was developed<br />
using Microsoft Visual C#.NET for integrating<br />
modules, developed database, ETo calculator,<br />
CropWat, Aquacrop, GIS and spatial query<br />
interface (Fig. 23). It comprises seven modules<br />
namely, crop water demand, canal demandsupply,<br />
groundwater, irrigation scheduling,<br />
48
<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
Management of water logging/saline soils<br />
Table 28 : Field demonstrations with initial soil status at the time of sowing<br />
Location<br />
<strong>Soil</strong> quality<br />
Field<br />
Distributary<br />
Water<br />
course<br />
Village (District)<br />
Farmer<br />
Depth pH s<br />
ECe SAR<br />
1. Mid reach Mid reach<br />
Butana Khetlan<br />
(Sonipat)<br />
Kapoor<br />
Singh<br />
0-15 7.7-8.0 3.6-17.0 6.5-30.4<br />
15-30 7.7-8.0 4.5-13.7 7.2-29.3<br />
2. Mid Mid<br />
Butana Kundu<br />
(Sonipat)<br />
Amit<br />
Singh<br />
0-15 7.8-8.2 2.0-3.2 6.0-7.6<br />
15-30 8.0-8.5 0.81-3.4 5.1-9.5<br />
3. Mid Tail<br />
Butana Kundu<br />
(Sonipat)<br />
Rajbir<br />
Singh<br />
0-15 7.9-8.1 1.7-3.3 6.1-7.7<br />
15-30 8.0-8.4 0.8-2.9 5.1-9.2<br />
4. Mid Tail<br />
Butana Khetlan<br />
(Sonipat)<br />
Anand<br />
Kumar<br />
0-15 8.1-8.2 0.5-1.2 1.7-3.3<br />
15-30 8.0-8.3 0.3-1.4 1.2-3.7<br />
5. Mid Tail<br />
Butana Khetlan<br />
(Sonipat)<br />
Jagat<br />
Singh<br />
0-15 8.0-8.2 2.2-4.05 2.5-4.0<br />
15-30 7.8-8.1 1.8-4.7 2.7-4.1<br />
6. Mid Tail<br />
Khanpur Khurd<br />
(Sonipat)<br />
Ramphal<br />
0-15 8.4-8.5 0.4-0.5 1.2-2.1<br />
15-30 8.4-8.6 0.3-0.5 2.5-4.4<br />
7. Mid Tail<br />
Ahulana<br />
(Sonipat)<br />
Rajbir<br />
singh<br />
0-15 7.9-8.2 1.1-8.6 1.4-10.6<br />
15-30 7.8-8.1 1.9-9.7 1.7-<strong>11</strong>.1<br />
8. Mid Tail<br />
Ahulana<br />
(Sonipat)<br />
Azad 0-15 8.1-8.3 0.5-3.3 3.4-7.1<br />
15-30 7.6-8.4 0.9-4.5 5.7-19.6<br />
9. Mid Head<br />
Ahulana<br />
(Sonipat)<br />
Wazir<br />
singh<br />
0-15 8.3-8.4 1.1-1.7 1.2-3.0<br />
15-30 8.3-8.7 0.4-0.8 2.8-4.8<br />
10 Tail Tail<br />
<strong>11</strong> Tail Mid<br />
Chhichhrana<br />
(Sonipat)<br />
Sanghi (Rohtak)<br />
12 Tail Tail Sanghi (Rohtak)<br />
Satish<br />
Ram<br />
Naveen<br />
Kumar<br />
Ashish<br />
Singh<br />
0-15 8.0-8.3 0.4-1.4 2.5-4.0<br />
15-30 7.4-8.4 0.5-3.6 3.1-6.9<br />
0-15 8.2-8.5 0.5-0.7 1.0-2.9<br />
15-30 7.8-8.4 0.5-0.6 1.3-3.5<br />
0-15 8.0-8.4 1.1-2.2 7.0-10.2<br />
15-30 7.8-8.4 0.8-1.4 5.7-8.4<br />
modelling, constraints, BMP based strategies<br />
and farmer’s services. Canal network, crops,<br />
soils, rainfall, canal flow and ET sub-modules<br />
under first two modules were completed and<br />
tested.<br />
Fig. 23 : An interface of DSS for the WYC<br />
In stakeholders’ servicing, 170 water user<br />
association members and farmers from Sonipat,<br />
and Rohtak districts were imparted training<br />
on management strategies for sustaining/<br />
enhancing crop yield under inadequate<br />
water supply, conjunctive use of poor quality<br />
groundwater with canal water, ongoing<br />
49
Management of water logging/saline soils <strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
Table 29 : Field demonstrations with initial water status at the time of sowing<br />
Field Village Farmer Groundwater quality Problem (s) Intervention (s)<br />
EC e<br />
SAR iw<br />
RSC<br />
1. Butana Khetlan<br />
(Sonipat)<br />
Kapoor<br />
Singh<br />
3.4 6.14 0.0 Deficit canal supply,<br />
saline soil and marginal<br />
saline water<br />
Salt tolerant<br />
variety (KRL-<br />
19)<br />
2. Butana Kundu<br />
(Sonipat)<br />
Amit<br />
Singh<br />
3.3 20.1 8.8 Deficit canal supply,<br />
normal soil and highly<br />
alkali water<br />
Salt tolerant<br />
variety (KRL-<br />
19)<br />
3. Butana Kundu<br />
(Sonipat)<br />
Rajbir<br />
Singh<br />
8.0 17.4 0.0 Deficit canal supply,<br />
normal soil and high<br />
SAR saline water<br />
Salt tolerant<br />
variety (KRL-<br />
19)<br />
4. Butana Khetlan<br />
(Sonipat)<br />
Anand<br />
Kumar<br />
4.2 3.5 0.0 Deficit canal supply,<br />
normal soil and saline<br />
water<br />
Conjunctive<br />
use (UGPL)<br />
and DBW-17<br />
HY variety<br />
5. Butana Khetlan<br />
(Sonipat)<br />
Jagat<br />
Singh<br />
4.4 3.2 0.0 Deficit canal supply,<br />
slight saline soil and<br />
saline water<br />
Conjunctive<br />
use and DBW-<br />
17 variety<br />
6. Khanpur Khurd<br />
(Sonipat)<br />
Ramphal 1.9 8.5 2.5 Deficit canal supply,<br />
normal soil and<br />
marginally alkali water<br />
Conjunctive<br />
use and DBW-<br />
17 variety<br />
7. Ahulana (Sonipat) Rajbir 3.0 5.7 0.0 Very deficit canal<br />
supply, saline soil and<br />
marginal saline water<br />
8. Ahulana (Sonipat) Azad 7.1 2.7 0.0 Very deficit canal<br />
supply, slight saline soil<br />
and saline water<br />
9. Ahulana (Sonipat) Wazir<br />
singh<br />
10 Chhichhrana<br />
(Sonipat)<br />
Satish<br />
Ram<br />
<strong>11</strong> Sanghi (Rohtak) Naveen<br />
Kumar<br />
12 Sanghi (Rohtak) Ashish<br />
Singh<br />
2.7 2.7 0.0 Deficit canal supply,<br />
normal soil and<br />
marginal saline water<br />
4.7 16.6 0.0 Very deficit canal<br />
supply (LWC), normal<br />
soil and high SAR saline<br />
water<br />
1.5 9.2 6.3 Very deficit canal<br />
supply (LWC), normal<br />
soil and alkali water<br />
3.1 20.0 5.8 Very deficit canal<br />
supply, normal soil and<br />
highly alkali water<br />
Note: DBW-17: High yielding variety for normal soils by DWR, Karnal<br />
UGPL: Under ground pipe line for bringing good quality water, LWC: Lined watercourse<br />
Salt tolerant<br />
variety (KRL-<br />
19)<br />
Conjunctive<br />
use and DBW-<br />
17 variety<br />
Irrigation<br />
scheduling<br />
and DBW-17<br />
variety<br />
Salt tolerant<br />
variety (KRL-<br />
19)<br />
Irrigation<br />
scheduling<br />
with zero<br />
tillage and<br />
DBW-17<br />
variety<br />
Conjunctive<br />
use with<br />
zero tillage<br />
and DBW-17<br />
variety<br />
50
<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
Management of water logging/saline soils<br />
secondary soil salinization, waterlogging<br />
and low soil fertility whereas twenty senior<br />
officers from CADA, Agriculture and Irrigation<br />
Department, and KVKs were trained on ‘Use<br />
of modern tools and management strategies<br />
for enhancing productivity in irrigated saline<br />
environment. Twenty project partners and staff<br />
were also trained at IIRS, Dehradun to inculcate<br />
the requisite skills for undertaking performance<br />
evaluation of canal command. A project website<br />
using ASP.NET, Javascript and HTML is<br />
updated regularly and can be accessed (http://<br />
cssri.talents.co.in) for dissemination of project<br />
information including achievements, partners’<br />
meetings, upcoming trainings and workshops<br />
to the stakeholders.<br />
Impact of Changing Trend in Weather, <strong>Soil</strong><br />
and Water Parameters on Crop Productivity<br />
in Fresh and Saline Groundwater Zones of<br />
Haryana (Pragati Maity, Satyendra Kumar, D.S.<br />
Bundela and S.K. Kamra)<br />
The rice- wheat cropping system, widely<br />
prevalent in the Indo-Gangetic Plain, is showing<br />
signs of fatigue with declining productivity<br />
in many areas. Impact of changing trend in<br />
weather, soil and water parameters on crop<br />
productivity is needed to be studied. Climate<br />
is perhaps the most important determinant of<br />
agricultural productivity. In order to study the<br />
changing trend of weather parameters at Karnal,<br />
37 years meteorological data were analyzed.<br />
The meteorological data were recorded from<br />
Agromet observatory situated at <strong>Central</strong><br />
<strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Salinity</strong> <strong>Research</strong> Institute. Average and<br />
decadal value of rainfall and rainy days (Table<br />
30) showed that except for rainfall of 1991-2000<br />
decade (where rainfall is more than long-term<br />
average annual rainfall) there is decrease in<br />
both average rainfall and rainy days in other<br />
periods. Decadal mean rainfall during monsoon<br />
months has a decreasing trend for July and<br />
August but an increasing trend for the month of<br />
June and September (Table 31). Similarly, while<br />
the number of rainy days in July and August is<br />
decreasing, these have remained almost constant<br />
during June and September. It indicated that the<br />
probability of getting high intensity rainfall is<br />
increasing in September month.<br />
Decade wise changes in monthly average<br />
maximum and minimum temperature, bright<br />
sun shine (BSS) hours and a number of other<br />
parameters were analysed. Trend analysis of<br />
BSS hours during 1983- 2009 showed that the<br />
average annual BSS of Karnal is 90.4 hr and it is<br />
decreasing @ 0.67 hr per year during the study<br />
period (Fig. 24).<br />
The analysis of block wise groundwater<br />
fluctuations for Karnal district from June, 1974<br />
(pre-monsoon) - June, 2005 depicts an average<br />
decline of 6.53 m @ 0.21 m decline per annum for<br />
the Karnal district as a whole (Table 32) and at<br />
0.08 m to 0.29 m per annum in different blocks.<br />
The declining watertable is becoming more<br />
Fig. 24 : Trend analysis of bright sun shine hours (BSS)<br />
during 1983- 2009<br />
Table 30 : Average and decadal value of rainfall and rainy days at Karnal during 1972-2009<br />
Weather<br />
parameters<br />
Average value<br />
(1972-2009)<br />
Average decadal value<br />
1972-80 1981-90 1991-00 2001-2009<br />
Rainfall (mm) 736 772.0 717.9 825.2 622.2<br />
Rainy days 47.4 58 52 43 37<br />
51
Management of water logging/saline soils <strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
and more rapid with time, being the highest in<br />
the period from 1999- 2005. Similar results are<br />
obtained for October (post- monsoon) period<br />
with an average decline of 6.77 m in the district<br />
@ 0.22 m decline per annum, which is about the<br />
same as in June i.e. 0.21 m annum -1 .<br />
Table 31 : Decade-wise average rainfall and rainy days in monsoon months<br />
Month<br />
Average rainfall (mm)<br />
Average rainy days<br />
1972-80 1981-90 1991-00 2001-09 1972-80 1981-90 1991-00 2001-09<br />
June 87.0 71.0 108.8 102.7 6 5 5 6<br />
July 262.2 195.5 203.1 <strong>11</strong>3.9 14 12 9 7<br />
Aug 218.2 186.0 223.7 120.6 14 <strong>11</strong> <strong>11</strong> 7<br />
Sept 76.3 80.2 <strong>11</strong>3.6 126.7 6 5 5 5<br />
Table 32 : Fluctuation of groundwater level (+) rise, (-) fall in Karnal district (June 1974 to June 2005)<br />
Sr.<br />
No.<br />
Block Fluctuation (m) Av. annual<br />
fluctuation (m)<br />
1974-79 1974-84 1974-89 1974-94 1974- 99 1974-2005 (June 1974-05)<br />
1 Karnal -0.25 -1.52 -3.18 -4.84 -2.28 -6.45 -0.20<br />
2 Indri -0.44 +0.07 -0.35 -1.20 +0.24 -2.77 -0.08<br />
3 Nilokheri +0.42 -0.38 -1.52 -2.94 -0.62 -5.69 -0.18<br />
4 Nissang +0.30 -1.79 -3.71 -6.05 -2.15 -7.79 -0.25<br />
5 Gharaunda +0.50 -1.79 -3.74 -7.67 -4.16 -9.<strong>11</strong> -0.29<br />
6 Assandh +1.09 -2.05 -4.01 -7.02 -2.18 -7.41 -0.24<br />
Average +0.27 -1.24 -2.76 -4.95 -1.87 -6.53 -0.21<br />
<br />
52
<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
MANAGEMENT OF MARGINAL QUALITY WATER<br />
Wastewater Use in Non-food Crops (Khajanchi<br />
Lal, R.K. Yadav, P. Dey, D.S. Bundela, S.K.<br />
Chaudhari and Madhu Chaudhary)<br />
Indiscriminate use of wastewater loaded with<br />
toxic elements and harmful pathogens pollutes<br />
our natural resources and impairs human<br />
health. For safe and sustainable disposal of<br />
wastewater in non-food crops like Eucalyptus,<br />
cut flower, aromatic and medicinal plants and<br />
finding the efficacy of low cost amendments for<br />
heavy metal removal from wastewater, field<br />
and lysimeteric experiments on the carrying<br />
capacity of cloned Eucalyptus, marigold (Tagetes<br />
erecta) and aromatic crops like Lemon grass<br />
(Cymbopogon flexosus), Nigundi (Vitex nigundo)<br />
and Tukham Malanga (Salvia aegyptica) were<br />
initiated at <strong>CSSRI</strong>, Karnal in rabi season of 2007-<br />
08 and were continued during <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong>.<br />
Eucalyptus trees planted in 2005 were irrigated<br />
with wastewater at IW/CPE ratio of 1.0, 2.0,<br />
2.5, 3.0 and control (no irrigation) and tube<br />
well irrigation at 1.0 IW/CPE since May 2008.<br />
Changes in water table depth, transpiration<br />
rate and tree height, diameter at stump and<br />
breast height were monitored regularly. Use<br />
of wastewater varying from 1 to 3 IW/CPE<br />
ratio resulted in 7.3 to 15.3 per cent increase in<br />
tree diameter at breast height and 4.4 to <strong>11</strong>.1<br />
per cent increase in height compared to tube<br />
well irrigation given at 1.0 IW/CPE. Amongst<br />
different wastewater treatments, both height and<br />
DBH increased by 7 per cent with the increase<br />
in IW/CPE ratio from 1.0 to 2.5. Increase in soil<br />
pH, EC, OC, available N, P, K and essential<br />
micronutrients with wastewater use were<br />
recorded. Because the wastewater of domestic<br />
nature, build-up of Cd, Cr, Pb and Ni was not<br />
observed in the soil. Transpiration rate of 5 years<br />
old trees was measured using sap flow sensors<br />
and the results indicated that on an average, 5-7<br />
mm of wastewater can be disposed in Eucalyptus<br />
planted at tree density of 1250 trees ha -1 .<br />
Frequency of irrigation had no particular effect<br />
on ground water table. Aromatic and medicinal<br />
plants like Lemon grass, Nirgundi and Tukham<br />
Fig. 25 : Metal contents in Nirgundi and Lemon grass oil<br />
Malanga raised with wastewater irrigation at<br />
0.6, 0.8, 1.0, 1.2 and 1.5 IW/CPE ratios either<br />
alone or in conjunction with tube well water in<br />
lysimeter in October 2007 were also monitored<br />
during the year <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong>. The biomass and oil<br />
yield increased with increasing wastewater<br />
application rate from 0.6 to 1.5 IW/CPE and also<br />
higher when compared to the respective level<br />
of tube well irrigation. Wastewater application<br />
either alone or in conjunction with tube well<br />
water produced more or less the same plant<br />
biomass and oil yield. Oil analysis indicated that<br />
Cu, Zn and Fe contents was higher in Nirgundi<br />
compared to Lemon grass. The levels of Ni, Cd,<br />
Cr and Pb in the oil of both the crops were very<br />
low and below the permissible limit (Fig. 25).<br />
Microbial Bioremediation of Wastewater for<br />
Heavy Metals (P.K.Joshi)<br />
Biomass of microbes acts as adsorbent to<br />
remove heavy metals from wastewater. The<br />
ability to remove heavy metals from wastewater<br />
varies greatly among microbes. This needs to<br />
be exploited for removal of heavy metals from<br />
wastewater through efficient microbes.<br />
Effect of inoculum size on removal of Pb, Cd<br />
and Ni by efficient fungi and bacteria<br />
Two fungi i.e. Trichoderma longibrachiatum, T.<br />
fasciculatum and two bacteria i.e. Bacillus cereus,<br />
B. sp. were tested for removal of heavy metals<br />
(Pb, Cd, Ni) at different inoculum levels. T.<br />
longibrachiatum showed higher Pb removal<br />
capacity (80.50%) than T. fasciculatum (71.00%)<br />
53
Management of marginal quality water <strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
at 3.0 per cent inoculum size (Fig. 26) whereas<br />
T. longibrachiatum removed higher Cd (89.85%)<br />
at 2.0 per cent inoculum size as compared to T.<br />
fasciculatum which removed (62.60%) Cd at 2.5<br />
per cent inoculum size. Ni removal capacity<br />
was also higher for T. longibrachiatum (59.20%)<br />
as compared to T. fasciculatum (42.55%) at 2<br />
per cent inoculum size from potato dextrose<br />
broth containing 20 mg/l of Pb, Cd and Ni<br />
individually.<br />
Bacillus cereus showed higher Pb, Ni removal<br />
capacity (55.90% and 40.75%) than B. sp.<br />
(43.50% and 23.50%) at inoculum size of 2.5<br />
and 2 per cent, respectively from nutrient broth<br />
containing 20 ppm of Pb and Ni individually.<br />
Cd removal capacity was higher for Bacillus sp.<br />
(39.60%) as compared to Bacillus cereus (24.30%)<br />
at 0.5 per cent inoculum size from nutrient broth<br />
containing 20 ppm of Cd (Fig. 27).<br />
Fig. 26 : Effect of inoculum size on per cent removal<br />
and uptake of Pb from potato dextrose broth<br />
containing 20 ppm of Pb by T. facciculatum<br />
and T.longitbrachiatum<br />
Fig. 27 : Effect of inoculum size on per cent removal and<br />
uptake of Cd from nutrient broth containing 20<br />
ppm of Cd by Bacillus cereus and Bacillus Sp.<br />
Removal of heavy metals by efficient fungi<br />
grown on agrowaste materials<br />
Consortium of five fungi (Aspergillus niger,<br />
A. terreus, T. longibrachiatum, T. fasciculatum,<br />
A. awamori) and two bacteria (Bacillus cereus,<br />
Bacillus sp.) in combination with different<br />
agro-waste material like charcoal, press mud,<br />
rice straw, FYM and rice husk were tested for<br />
removal of heavy metals (Cr, Cu, Ni) from<br />
industrial effluents. Data indicated encouraging<br />
results with microbial consortium along with<br />
press mud in comparison to press mud alone or<br />
other agro-waste materials.<br />
Trichoderma longibrachiatum removed<br />
maximum Pb, Cd and Ni at 2-3 per cent<br />
inoculum size whereas B. cereus and Bacillus<br />
sp. removed Pb, Cd and Ni at 0.5-2.5 per cent<br />
inoculum size from liquid medium. There<br />
was higher removal of Cr, Cu and Ni from<br />
industrial effluents by microbial consortium<br />
in combination with press mud.<br />
Evaluation of <strong>Salinity</strong> Tolerance of Coriander,<br />
Fennel and Fenugreek Seed Spices (R.K. Yadav,<br />
R. L. Meena, M. Sethi and J. C. Dagar)<br />
<strong>CSSRI</strong>, Karnal (Haryana) and NRCSS, Ajmer<br />
(Rajasthan) initiated a collaborative project<br />
on assessment of overall and stage dependant<br />
tolerance of seed spices to salinity and its<br />
impact on their quality so as to boost seed spice<br />
production under salt stress. Field experiment<br />
on assessment of overall and stage dependant<br />
tolerance of fennel (Foeniculum vulgare),<br />
coriander (Coriandrum sativum) and fenugreek<br />
(Trigonella foenum-graecum L.) to low (3.6 dS m -1 ),<br />
high (8.7 dS m -1 ) and their alternate conjunctive<br />
irrigations was carried out at Bir Forest Farm<br />
Hisar. Further in a pot experiment conducted<br />
at <strong>CSSRI</strong>, Karnal (Haryana), 12 cultivars of each<br />
of coriander and fennel were irrigated with 0.6,<br />
3.0, 6.0, 9.0 and 12.0 dS m -1 salinity water for<br />
assessing their comparative tolerance.<br />
Fennel was observed to be relatively more<br />
tolerant to saline water irrigation as the decrease<br />
in yield (Table 33) from continuous use of low<br />
saline (3.6 dS m -1 ) water for irrigation, alternate<br />
irrigations of low (3.6 dS m -1 ) and high (8.7 dS<br />
54
<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
Management of marginal quality water<br />
Table 33 : Seed and total biomass yields of coriander, fennel and fenugreek under different modes of saline<br />
water irrigation<br />
Crop/mode of<br />
irrigation<br />
Coriander (t ha -1 ) Fennel (t ha -1 ) *Fenugreek (t ha -1 )<br />
Biomass Seed Yield Biomass Seed Yield Biomass Seed Yield<br />
Low 1.57 0.98 2.02 1.15 0.43 0.22<br />
Alternate 1.52 0.92 1.98 1.09 0.51 0.30<br />
High saline 1.21 0.71 1.71 0.91 0.40 0.19<br />
LSD (p=0.05) 0.18 0.10 0.22 0.18 NA NA<br />
Crops: Seed-0.20; Biomass-0.34; Irrigation water salinity : Seed-0.24; Biomass-0.38; Irrig x<br />
crop: seed- 0.22; biomass-0.35<br />
*Crop was damaged heavily by rabbits; NA- not analyzed for statistical comparison<br />
m -1 ) salinity water, and irrigations with high<br />
salinity (8.7 dS m -1 ) water was to the extent of<br />
4.7 and 20 per cent in seed yield, and about 2<br />
and 15 per cent in total biomass production,<br />
respectively. In comparison to above extent of<br />
decrease in fennel, the seed and biomass yield of<br />
coriander decreased about 6 and 27 per cent and<br />
3 and 23 per cent, respectively indicating that<br />
coriander was comparatively more sensitive to<br />
saline environment than fennel. We could not<br />
ascertain the salinity tolerance of fenugreek<br />
because of the extensive rabbit damage in the<br />
crop. So, the seed and biomass yield data of<br />
fenugreek given in Table 33 are not conclusive.<br />
As the salinity of irrigation water increased,<br />
there was decrease in vegetative as well as<br />
reproductive growth of fennel and coriander.<br />
However, reproductive growth i.e umbels and<br />
seed yield was more affected than vegetative<br />
growth.<br />
The genetic differences in salinity tolerance<br />
of diverse germplasm of fennel and coriander<br />
were evaluated in the pot study, where relative<br />
yield reduction in each variety of two crops in<br />
response to salinity levels was worked out using<br />
piece-wise linear response [Salt model; RY= 100-<br />
a (Irrigation water salinity- b)] fitted to yield<br />
in response to salinity. Constants of slope of<br />
decrease in yield in response to unit increase in<br />
salinity (a) and thresh hold limits of salinity (b)<br />
beyond which yield of a given variety of fennel<br />
and coriander starts declining are worked out<br />
and presented in Table 34 and 35, respectively.<br />
Table 34 : Piece-wise linear response model constants for fennel cultivars in relation to irrigation water<br />
salinity<br />
Varities/Paratmeters a b r <strong>Salinity</strong> tolerance rank<br />
GF-1 2.6 4.64 **0.93 3<br />
GF-2 2.9 4.39 **0.91 4<br />
RF-101 3.6 3.82 **0.89 8<br />
PF-35 2.3 4.67 **0.90 2<br />
RF-178 2.2 4.86 **0.92 1<br />
GF-<strong>11</strong> 3.9 3.74 **0.87 10<br />
CO-1 3.2 3.97 **0.94 6<br />
Hisar Swarup 4.1 3.79 **0.91 9<br />
Pant Madhirika 3.1 4.18 **0.89 5<br />
Azad Sawnt 3.4 3.86 **0.92 7<br />
NRCSS-AF-1 4.1 3.70 **0.93 <strong>11</strong><br />
Rajendra Sawrna 4.0 3.68 **0.90 12<br />
55
Management of marginal quality water <strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
It is evident from the data that in fennel variety<br />
RF-178, PF-35 and GF-1 were most tolerant to<br />
salinity whereas Rajendra Sawrna, NRCSS-<br />
AF-1 and GF-<strong>11</strong> were most sensitive. In case of<br />
coriander, the most tolerant was seed cum leafy<br />
type variety RCR-41, which had a threshold<br />
‘b’ value of 4.57 dS m -1 with slope ‘a’ of – 0.021,<br />
followed by GCR-2 and CO-2, whereas Pant<br />
Haritma, Sadhna and Swathi were among the<br />
least tolerant ones.<br />
The results suggested that fennel is more<br />
tolerant than coriander to saline water irrigation.<br />
The deleterious effects of high salinity water<br />
irrigation could be minimized by alternate<br />
irrigations of low and high salinity water as the<br />
yield realized with this mode was at par with<br />
that of continuous irrigation of low salinity<br />
water and significantly better than continuous<br />
irrigations with high salinity water. Further,<br />
RF-178, PF-35 and GF-1 varieties of fennel and<br />
RCR-446, GCR-2 and CO-2 varieties of coriander<br />
were found to be suitable for cultivation with<br />
high salinity irrigation water.<br />
Table 35 : Linear piece-wise model response constants for coriander cultivars in relation to irrigation water<br />
salinity<br />
Varities a b r <strong>Salinity</strong> tolerance rank<br />
NRCSS-Acr-1 (Veg/leafy) 4.5 3.64 **0.93 7<br />
GCR-2 (Seed) 2.7 4.18 **0.91 2<br />
RCR-41 (Veg/leafy) 4.6 3.56 **0.89 9<br />
RCR446 (Seed/leafy) 2.1 4.57 **0.90 1<br />
CO-2 (Seed) 3.0 4.06 **0.92 3<br />
Hisar Sugandha (Leafy/ seed) 4.0 3.71 **0.87 5<br />
Rajendra Swathi (Seed) 3.8 3.87 **0.92 4<br />
Sadhana (Seed) 4.9 3.49 **0.91 <strong>11</strong><br />
Swathi (Seed) 4.8 3.54 **0.89 10<br />
Azad Dhania (Veg/leafy) 4.4 3.61 **0.92 8<br />
CO4 (Seed) 4.3 3.68 **0.93 6<br />
Pant Haritma (Leafy) 5.1 3.52 **0.90 12<br />
<br />
56
<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
CROP IMPROVEMENT FOR SALINITY, ALKALINITY AND<br />
WATERLOGGING STRESSES<br />
Genetic Improvement of Rice for Salt Tolerance<br />
(S.L. Krishna Murthy, Ali Qadar and P. Dey)<br />
This project aims at the development, evaluation<br />
and dissemination of salt tolerant rice genotypes.<br />
To achieve the objectives, following trials were<br />
conducted and material maintained during<br />
kharif <strong>2010</strong>.<br />
Station trials<br />
Preliminary evaluation trial<br />
A total of 40 entries including check varieties<br />
were screened in the normal, moderate (pH 2<br />
~ 9.5), and saline (EC e<br />
~10.0 dS m -1 ) soils in<br />
the micro plots in RBD with two replications.<br />
Under normal conditions, RIL (CSR<strong>11</strong>/MI 48)-<br />
178 gave the highest yield (9.33 t ha -1 ), followed<br />
by CSR 36 (8.16 t ha -1 ), CN 1266-26-177 (6.93<br />
t ha -1 ) and BULK-8 (6.67 t ha -1 ). CSR 36 (5.87 t<br />
ha -1 ) again out- performed from all entries in<br />
moderate sodic soil followed by CSR 23 (4.67<br />
t ha -1 ), BULK-19 (4.40 t ha -1 ) and RIL (CSR<strong>11</strong>/<br />
MI 48)-1(4.13 t ha -1 ). Under high salinity, CSR<br />
23 performed best (3.79 t ha -1 ) followed by RIL<br />
(CSR<strong>11</strong>/MI 48)-178 (2.68 t ha -1 ), CSR 36 (2.65 t<br />
ha -1 ) and BULK-22 (1.94 t ha -1 ). Overall results<br />
indicated that CSR 36, RIL (CSR<strong>11</strong>/MI 48)-178,<br />
CSR-RIL (CSR 27/MI 48)-1 and CSR 23 to be<br />
high yielding and stress resilient genotypes.<br />
Yield evaluation trial<br />
This experiment was planned to evaluate the<br />
comparative yield performance of 34 genotypes<br />
including high yield potential varieties along<br />
with salt tolerant varieties across normal,<br />
moderate sodic (pH 2<br />
9.5), high sodic (pH 2<br />
9.9)<br />
and highly saline (EC e<br />
~ 10.0 dS m -1 ) microplots.<br />
Under normal conditions, BCW 56 gave the<br />
highest yield (9.23 t ha -1 ), followed by IR77674-<br />
3B-8-1-3-14-2-AJY3 (7.16 t ha -1 ), VSR 156 (6.58<br />
t ha -1 ) and IR 77674-3B-8-1-3-13-2-AJY2 (6.32<br />
t ha -1 ). CSR 36 out-performed all entries in<br />
moderate sodic soil (6.67 t ha -1 ) followed by<br />
CSR-RIL (CSR 27/MI 48)-169 (6.08 t ha -1 ), HKR<br />
47 (6.01 t ha -1 ) and CSR 23 (5.78 t ha -1 ). Similarly,<br />
in high sodic soil, CSR-RIL (CSR27/MI48)-197,<br />
CSR 36, IR60997-16-2-3-2-2R and IR77674-3B-8-<br />
1-3-14-2-AJY3 yielded 2.47, 1.97, 1.61 and 1.57 t<br />
ha -1 , respectively. Under high salinity, HKR 120<br />
performed best (2.71 t ha -1 ) followed by CSR27<br />
(2.57 t ha -1 ) and HKR 127 (2.56 t ha -1 ). Overall<br />
results indicated that CSR 36, CSR-RIL(CSR 27/<br />
MI 48)-169, CSR-RIL (CSR27/MI48)-197, HKR<br />
127, IR 60997-16-2-3-2-2R and CSR 23 to be high<br />
yielding and stress resilient genotypes.<br />
National trials<br />
Alkaline and inland saline tolerant varietal trial<br />
Nineteen genotypes were evaluated with salt<br />
tolerant check varieties under high sodic (pH 2<br />
~ 9.9) and saline (EC e<br />
~10.0 dSm -1 ) soils in micro<br />
plots under field conditions in RBD with two<br />
replications. In high sodic soil, 2001 (2.12 t ha -1 )<br />
out yielded all the entries followed by 2004 (1.62<br />
t ha -1 ) and 2018 (1.62 t ha -1 ) and CSR 36 (1.58 t<br />
ha -1 ). Under salinity stress, 2001 showed the<br />
highest paddy yield (3.19 t ha -1 ) followed by<br />
CSR 23 (2.77 t ha -1 ), 2002 (2.74 t ha -1 ), 2008 (2.57 t<br />
ha -1 ), 2009 (2.50 t ha -1 ).<br />
National salinity/alkalinity screening nursery<br />
A total of 48 entries including check variety were<br />
screened in the high sodic (pH 2<br />
~ 9.9) and saline<br />
(EC e<br />
~ 10.0 dS m -1 ) soils in the micro plots in RBD<br />
with two replications. In high sodic soil, 3825<br />
(3.79 t ha -1 ) out yielded all the entries followed<br />
by 3847 (3.49 t ha -1 ) and 3848 (2.87 t ha -1 ).<br />
Advanced bulks, segregating lines and<br />
germplasm<br />
A total of 196 segregating lines derived from<br />
different crosses were multiplied. A total of<br />
379 genetic stocks were grown in the field for<br />
maintenance. Besides, 229 advance stabilized<br />
lines were maintained.<br />
National Project on Transgenics in Crops-<br />
<strong>Salinity</strong> Tolerance in Rice : Functional<br />
Genomics Component (ICAR funded) (S. L.<br />
Krishna Murthy and S. K. Sharma)<br />
The main aim of this project is to map the<br />
important genomic regions/QTLs controlling<br />
sodicity tolerance traits in rice. This involves<br />
57
Crop improvement for salinity, alkalinity and waterlogging stresses <strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
collaborative work between <strong>CSSRI</strong> (for<br />
phenotyping) and NRC on Plant Bio-technology,<br />
New Delhi (for genotyping).<br />
The salient findings of the systematic phenotyping<br />
of 216 recombinant inbred lines (RILs)<br />
derived from CSR <strong>11</strong> x MI 48 cross are reported<br />
here. A total of 225 genotypes including 216 RILs<br />
with parents were phenotyped in replicated<br />
Simple Lattice Design with 3 environments<br />
{normal, moderate (pH 2<br />
~9.5) and high sodic<br />
(pH 2<br />
~ 9.9) soil conditions} in microplots. Data on<br />
range, mean and relative sensitivity of different<br />
traits for these lines as recorded during kharif<br />
<strong>2010</strong> are presented in Table 36.<br />
Grain yield and biomass were the most sensitive<br />
traits and were reduced by 40 and 39 per cent<br />
under moderate sodicity stress followed by<br />
number of grains/panicle (33 %), spike let<br />
fertility (21 %), plant height (13 %), total tillers/<br />
plant (13 %), panicle length and productive<br />
tillers/plant (8 %) and 1000 grain weight (6%).<br />
Grain yield and biomass were the most sensitive<br />
traits in high sodicity stress and were reduced<br />
by 74 and 70 per cent under high sodicity stress<br />
followed by number of grains/panicle (58%),<br />
plant height (41%) spikelet fertility (38%) total<br />
tillers/plant (36%), productive tillers/plant (34<br />
%) panicle length (26%) and 1000 grain weight<br />
(16%).<br />
Development and Evaluation of Salt Tolerant<br />
Transgenic Rice-DBT funded (S.K. Sharma,<br />
S.L. Krishna Murthy and R.K. Gautam)<br />
Based on the relatively better performance of<br />
TPSP(Trehalose Phosphate Synthase Phosphatase)<br />
rice plant progenies and TPSP gene confirmation<br />
in 2009, selected eight better progenies viz., ICG<br />
A18-2-R1, ICG TA7-1-3-R1, ICG TA7-2-1-R1,<br />
ICG A18-4-R2, ICG TA7-1-4-R2, ICG TA7-2-1-<br />
R2, DR7-<strong>11</strong>-3-R2 and ICG A18-2-R2, which<br />
were further evaluated for tolerance to salinity<br />
and sodicity during <strong>2010</strong> under transgenic<br />
green house conditions at <strong>CSSRI</strong>, Karnal. Two<br />
sets of TPSP lines were planted under high<br />
saline (EC e<br />
~10 dS m -1 ) and high sodic (pH 2<br />
~9.9)<br />
environment in microplots. Therefore, a total of<br />
12 genotypes including 8 events (ICG A18-2-R1,<br />
Table 36 : Range, mean and reduction in traits of CSR <strong>11</strong> x MI 48 RILs under sodic conditions<br />
Traits Range Mean % reduction<br />
Normal MS HS Normal MS HS MS HS<br />
Plant height<br />
(cm) 71.1 - 173.8 60.8- 134.0 22.3-81.4 95.45 83.18 55.84 13 41<br />
Panicle length<br />
(cm) 17.9 - 32.2 16.4 - 29.4 5.8 - 19.9 22.61 20.91 16.79 8 26<br />
Total tillers/<br />
plant 7.6 - 21.4 7 - 20.2 1.3 - 16.0 12.18 10.76 7.83 12 36<br />
Productive<br />
tillers/plant 5.2 – 19.0 5.4 - 18.4 0.83 - 15.3 10.58 9.74 6.96 8 34<br />
No. of grains/<br />
panicle 34.5 - 175.1 18.66- 91.6 6.66 - 55.8 90.05 60.70 37.63 33 58<br />
1000-grain<br />
weight (g) 12.61 - 31.2 9.71 - 28. 4 7.56 - 26.1 23.62 22.12 19.89 6 16<br />
Spikelet<br />
fertility (%) 57.06 - 87.9 17. 3 - 77.6 8.33 - 53.0 73.41 58.03 45.62 21 38<br />
Grain yield/<br />
plant (g) 19- 232.5 12.0 - 99.0 0.5 – 53.0 68.06 41.03 17.60 40 74<br />
Biological<br />
yield/plant (g) 68 – 620 35.5- 245.5 3.5 – 180.0 197.53 120.35 58.52 39 70<br />
MS-Moderately sodicity; HS- High sodicity<br />
58
<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
Crop improvement for salinity, alkalinity and waterlogging stresses<br />
ICG TA7-1-3-R1, ICG TA7-2-1-R1, ICG A18-4-<br />
R2, ICG TA7-1-4-R2, ICG TA7-2-1-R2, DR7-<strong>11</strong>-<br />
3-R2 and ICG A18-2-R2), control (IR64), tolerant<br />
checks (CSR10 and CSR 23) and sensitive<br />
check (VSR156) were replicated twice under<br />
high salinity stress. Six transgenic progenies<br />
survived and two died under high salinity<br />
stress (EC e<br />
~10 dS m -1 ). Spikelet fertility/panicle<br />
of TPSP rice progenies recorded in high saline<br />
conditions (Fig 28). Among transgenic plants,<br />
ICG A18-2-R1 (58.92%) performed well and<br />
its performance was at par with check CSR 10<br />
(59.00%). ICG A18-2-R1 (58.92%) and ICG TA7-<br />
1-4-R2 (58.04 %) performed better than other<br />
check CSR 23 (52.86%). Yield/plant of TPSP rice<br />
progenies recorded in high saline conditions<br />
(Fig. 29) and their performance was well i e ICG<br />
A18-2-R1 (6.61g), ICG TA7-1-3-R1 (3.70g), ICG<br />
TA7-2-1-R1 (3.07g) and ICG TA7-1-4-R2 (5.05g).<br />
Expression of transgenic plant progenies ICG<br />
A18-2-R1 (6.61g), ICG TA7-1-3-R1 (3.70g) and<br />
ICG TA7-1-4-R2 (5.05g) was better.<br />
On the other hand, 12 genotypes encompassing<br />
12 TPSP plant progenies (ICG A18-1R2, ICG<br />
TA7-1-3 R2, ICG TA7-1-5 R2, ICG A-18-1 R1, ICG<br />
A-18-2 R2, ICG A-18-5 R2, DR7-<strong>11</strong>-4 R1 and ICG<br />
A18-4 R2 ), control (IR64), tolerant check (CSR 10<br />
and CSR 23) and sensitive check (VSR156) were<br />
also planted under high sodic stress (pH~9.96)<br />
with 2 replications. Six transgenic progenies<br />
survived and two died under high sodic stress<br />
(pH~9.9). Yield performance of TPSP plant<br />
progenies is presented in Fig 30.<br />
Fig 28 : Spikelet fertility/panicle of TPSP rice lines in<br />
saline conditions (EC e<br />
~10 dS m -1 ).<br />
Fig 29 :Yield of TPSP rice progenies in saline conditions<br />
(EC e<br />
~10 dS m -1 ).<br />
Fig 30 : Yield of TPSP rice lines in high sodic conditions<br />
(pH 2<br />
~9.9).<br />
Enhancing and Stabilizing the Productivity of<br />
Salt Affected Areas by Incorporating Genes<br />
for Tolerance of Abiotic Stresses in Rice<br />
(BMZ-IRRI funded) (S.K. Sharma, Ali Qadar,<br />
R.K. Gautam, Y.P. Singh, T. Damodaran, B.K.<br />
Bandyopadhyay, D. Burman, S.K. Sarangi and<br />
S. Mandal)<br />
A total of 40 SALTOL derivatives (developed at<br />
IRRI, Philippines) with four salt tolerant check<br />
varieties viz CSR 10, CSR 23, CSR 27 and CSR<br />
36 and one sensitive variety (VSR 156) were<br />
evaluated. The materials were evaluated under<br />
normal, sodic moderate sodic pH~9.5 and<br />
high sodic pH~9.9) and saline (EC e<br />
~10 dS m -1 )<br />
environments of precisely controlled microplot<br />
facility at <strong>CSSRI</strong>, Karnal during kharif <strong>2010</strong>.<br />
Among SALTOL introgressed lines, genotypes<br />
IR 85212-56-10 and IR 84645-305-6-1-B were<br />
59
Crop improvement for salinity, alkalinity and waterlogging stresses <strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
each environment. Though salt tolerant check<br />
variety CSR 23 out yielded all lines in almost all<br />
the environments, among SALTOL derivatives,<br />
IR84649-275-3-2-B and IR84649-275-4-1-B appear<br />
promising under moderate sodic conditions<br />
(Fig. 31). However, derivatives IR 84649-21-20<br />
and IR 84645-281-10-B-B under salinity proved<br />
better due to their lesser magnitudes of salt<br />
stress susceptibility indices than other genotypes<br />
(Fig. 32).<br />
Screening SALTOL rice material in high sodic (pH .9.9),<br />
moderate sodic (pH 9.5), and normal microplots<br />
found tolerant under moderate sodic conditions.<br />
Under salinity, IR 84649-21-20 and under<br />
moderate sodic condition IR 84649-275-3-2-B<br />
proved better due to its lesser magnitudes of<br />
salt stress susceptibility index.<br />
The stress intensity was 0.32 and 0.53 under<br />
moderate sodic and high saline environments,<br />
respectively. Significant variability was<br />
recorded among all the genotypes tested under<br />
National Project on Establishment of National<br />
Rice Resource Database (DBT funded) (S.K.<br />
Sharma and S.L. Krishna Murthy)<br />
The project aims to characterize and assess<br />
redundancy in the already catalogued accessions<br />
of rice in India, generation of a ‘passport data’ for<br />
every unique accession by cataloguing already<br />
available as well as new information generated,<br />
evaluation of defined agronomic traits in the<br />
unique rice accessions and creation of the ‘core/<br />
mini-core germplasm’ for superior traits and<br />
its marker-based characterization. This project<br />
involves collaborative work between <strong>CSSRI</strong><br />
(mainly for morpho-agronomic evaluation<br />
Fig. 31: Grain yield performance of SALTOL lines under different salt stress environments<br />
Fig. 32: Stress susceptibility index (SSl) of the rice genotypes under salt stress environments<br />
60
<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
Crop improvement for salinity, alkalinity and waterlogging stresses<br />
and NBPGR, NRCPB & UDSC (for molecular<br />
characterization).<br />
A total of 3500 accessions (including 6 check<br />
varieties and 20 wild rice) were evaluated<br />
in augmented design under normal field<br />
conditions. Data were recorded for early plant<br />
vigour, coleoptile colour, basal leaf sheath<br />
colour, Leaf blade colour, leaf pubescence,<br />
leaf length, leaf width, days to 50% flowering,<br />
panicle exertion, stigma colour, apiculus colour,<br />
number of effective tillers, plant height, panicle<br />
length, panicle type, awing, days to maturity,<br />
seed coat colour, grain length width ratio,<br />
100 grain weight, hull colour (Husk colour),<br />
threshability, aroma, grain yield per plant,<br />
seedling height, flag leaf angle, ligules shape, leaf<br />
senescence, sterile lemma and auricle presence/<br />
absence. One hundred twenty five accessions<br />
did not flower and 809 accessions were late in<br />
maturity. The data of these accessions are being<br />
compiled.<br />
All India Wheat and Barley Workshop held<br />
at IARI, New Delhi in August, 2009 were<br />
released by the <strong>Central</strong> Sub-Committee on<br />
Crop Standards, Notification and Release of<br />
Varieties for Agricultural Crops in <strong>2010</strong>. Both<br />
these varieties having better yield potential<br />
and disease resistance are likely to spread<br />
over larger target areas besides providing<br />
good replacement for the earlier released<br />
varieties i.e. KRL 1-4 and KRL 19. The seed of<br />
these varieties has been supplied to farmers,<br />
extension agencies and seed producing<br />
agencies.<br />
Genetic Improvement of Wheat Germplasm for<br />
<strong>Salinity</strong>, Sodicity and Waterlogging Stresses<br />
(Neeraj Kulshreshtha and S. K. Sharma)<br />
Development and screening of salt tolerant<br />
genetic material<br />
Two salt tolerant varieties of <strong>CSSRI</strong>, Karnal,<br />
KRL 210 and KRL 213 identified during 48 th<br />
<strong>Salinity</strong>, sodicity and waterlogging affected fields Village<br />
Salimpur Trolley, Distt Sonepat, Haryana<br />
(a)<br />
(b)<br />
Performance of wheat varieties KRL 210 (a) and KRL 213 (b)<br />
61
Crop improvement for salinity, alkalinity and waterlogging stresses <strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
All India <strong>Salinity</strong>/Alkalinity Tolerance<br />
Varietal Trial (Neeraj Kulshreshtha, Y.P. Singh<br />
and G.G. Rao)<br />
During rabi 2009-10, All India Alkalinity/<br />
<strong>Salinity</strong> Tolerance Varietal Trial was proposed<br />
at 10 locations and conducted at 9 centers. The<br />
trial consisted of <strong>11</strong> test entries and four checks.<br />
The mean yield ranged from 1.94 t ha -1 (Bharuch)<br />
to 4.28 t ha -1 (Hisar). Among the final year<br />
entries, KRL 238 (3.35 t ha -1 ) and KRL 240 (2.88<br />
t ha -1 ) ranked 1 st and 2 nd , respectively. KRL 283<br />
(3.48 t ha -1 ) was the top most entry among the<br />
first year entries and was promoted to second<br />
year. Overall, KRL 283, KRL 238 and identified<br />
checks KRL 210 and KRL 213 were in the first<br />
non-significant group.<br />
Grain characteristics in most of the test entries<br />
were found acceptable. The days to heading of<br />
different genotypes ranged from 86 days (KRL<br />
19) to 98 days (KRL 249) whereas plant height<br />
ranged from 77 cm (KRL 240) to <strong>11</strong>4 cm (Kharchia<br />
65(C)). Thousand grain weight of the varieties<br />
ranged from 31 g (WH 1052 and KRL 240) to 37 g<br />
(KRL 273, WH 1095 and KRL 210).<br />
<strong>Salinity</strong>/Alkalinity Tolerance Screening<br />
Nursery (Neeraj Kulshreshtha, Y. P. Singh and<br />
G. G. Rao)<br />
During 2009-10, salinity/alkalinity tolerance<br />
screening nursery was implemented at 9<br />
locations. The nursery consisted of 60 entries and<br />
five checks: Kharchia 65, HD 4530, KRL 19, KRL<br />
3-4 and PDW 233 with 6 blocks in augmented<br />
design. Each block comprised of 10 test entries<br />
and 5 checks. Superior lines were identified<br />
on the basis of the analysis of grain yield and<br />
comparison with the pooled value (repeated 6<br />
times at one center) of the checks. The genotypes<br />
that performed better in comparison to Kharchia<br />
65 among bread wheat and the best check among<br />
durum wheat are given in Table 37.<br />
Development of new F 1<br />
crosses<br />
Fifty one crosses and back crosses were<br />
attempted to widen the genetic variability for<br />
salt tolerance and waterlogging tolerance and to<br />
incorporate salt tolerance in the widely adapted<br />
and disease resistant wheat lines/varieties,<br />
namely Kharchia 65, KRL 3-4, KRL 99, KRL 210,<br />
Table 37 : Mean performance of the entries in<br />
salinity/alkalinity tolerance screening<br />
nursery<br />
Sr.<br />
No.<br />
Entry<br />
Triticum aestivum<br />
Yield<br />
(g/plot)<br />
Height<br />
(cm)<br />
1 KRL 304 400 85 3<br />
2 KRL 303 398 76 4<br />
3 KRL 315 384 82 3<br />
4 KRL 324 383 82 4<br />
5 KRL 301 376 83 3<br />
6 KRL 302 376 86 3<br />
7 WH 1083 372 85 3<br />
8 WH 1097 370 84 3<br />
9 KRL 323 368 81 3<br />
10 KRL 309 367 81 3<br />
<strong>11</strong> KRL 322 367 84 3<br />
12 KRL 305 366 87 3<br />
13 KRL 300 364 79 4<br />
14 KRL 312 362 83 3<br />
15 KRL 306 358 88 3<br />
16 LBP 2009-24 356 78 4<br />
17 KRL 299 355 84 3<br />
18 KRL 307 354 81 4<br />
19 RAJ 42<strong>11</strong> 347 79 3<br />
20 NW 5029 346 80 3<br />
21 RWP 2009-12 345 80 4<br />
22 KRL 316 345 80 3<br />
Growth<br />
Vigour<br />
Triticum durum<br />
1 KRL 294 300 71 4<br />
2 KRL 296 296 69 3<br />
3 KRL 297 232 73 4<br />
Checks<br />
1 Kharchia 65 330 103 3<br />
2 HD 4530 171 68 4<br />
3 KRL 19 277 78 3<br />
4 KRL 3-4 363 101 3<br />
5 PDW 233 230 76 4<br />
Mean 313 81 3<br />
Max 400 100 4<br />
Min 194 69 2<br />
KRL 213, KRL 283, KRL 240, KRL 249, KRL 250,<br />
KRL 273, KRL 278, KRL 284, KRS 9382, KRS<br />
9337, PBW 486, PBW 343, PBW 589, PBW 583,<br />
PBW 550, PBW 525, PBW 550, FLW 2, FLW 8,<br />
FLW 4, HS 471, HD 2964, and HW 2045.<br />
62
<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
Crop improvement for salinity, alkalinity and waterlogging stresses<br />
Screening of segregating and advanced<br />
generation crosses<br />
Forty one F 2<br />
and about three hundred advanced<br />
generation lines from the crosses of high yielding<br />
varieties (PBW 343, WH 542, HD2329, Inqlab,<br />
CPAN 3004, DBW 18, and HD 2009), disease<br />
resistant genetic stocks (FLW 2, FLW 3, FLW 4,<br />
FLW 5, HP 1872, HS 460, HS 472, HS 484, HW<br />
2045, HPW 17, HUW 234, PBW 509, PBW 525,<br />
PBW 524, VL 852, VL 867), salt tolerant varieties<br />
(KRL 99, KRL19, KRL 3-4, KRL 35, KRL 19, KRS<br />
607, KRL 1-4, KRS 622, KRL <strong>11</strong>9, KRL 238 and<br />
Kharchia 65) and imported genotypes (Ducula<br />
4, Maringa, Spear, Perenjori, BT Schomburgk<br />
and BWMA 4) were evaluated and selected for<br />
their suitability under different salt stresses.<br />
Anticipatory breeding for creating resistance<br />
against new virulence Ug 99 of stem rust<br />
To incorporate resistance to race Ug 99 in salt<br />
tolerant cultivates in wheat, initiatives were<br />
taken during crop seasons 2005-06, 2006-07, 2007-<br />
08 and 2008-09 as per latest ICAR guidelines.<br />
The crosses made in 2005-06 were advanced<br />
using summer nursery facility at Dalang<br />
Maidan during summer 2006 and were further<br />
advanced along with selection for salt tolerance<br />
in 2006-07. The selected progenies were sent to<br />
Dalang Maidan for generation advancement.<br />
In addition, crosses were made during 2009-10<br />
rabi season using parents having resistance to<br />
race Ug 99. The timely strategy adopted in this<br />
regard will lead to development of salt tolerant<br />
and Ug 99 resistant cultivars in due course of<br />
time.<br />
Germplasm collection and maintenance<br />
Nearly 600 entries of working germplasm based<br />
on plant type, salt tolerance and productivity<br />
were maintained besides 300 doubled haploid<br />
lines of two different crosses (Ducula4/*2<br />
Brookton & HD2329/Camm) for further use in<br />
the breeding programme.<br />
Breeder and nucleus seed production<br />
Breeder seed of <strong>CSSRI</strong> varieties KRL 19 (2.5 t),<br />
KRL 210 (0.5 t) and KRL 213 (0.5 t) was produced<br />
at <strong>CSSRI</strong> Karnal farm for distribution to various<br />
seed producing agencies, farm section and<br />
farmers. Nucleus seed of 40 lines (KRL entries)<br />
and of the released varieties KRL 1-4, KRL19,<br />
KRL 210 and KRL 213 was produced.<br />
Evaluation of wheat varieties for salt stress in<br />
microplots<br />
Twenty three wheat varieties were evaluated<br />
under different levels of salt stress i.e. normal<br />
(control), saline (EC e<br />
5.9 dS m -1 ) and sodic (pH 2<br />
9.3) in the microplots with three replications.<br />
The genotypes KRL 3-4, KRL 99 and Kharchia<br />
65 were found to be highly tolerant genotypes,<br />
whereas DW1, HD 2285, HD 4530, HD 2851,<br />
HS 460, DW 3 and HD 2009 were the sensitive<br />
genotypes. The genotypes KRL 213, KRL 238,<br />
KRL 250, KRL 251, KRL 210, KRL <strong>11</strong>9, KRL 240,<br />
KRL 19 and KRL 229 were found to be medium<br />
tolerant.<br />
Incorporation of Salt Tolerance through<br />
Induced Mutagenesis (Neeraj Kulshreshtha,<br />
P.C. Sharma and R.K. Gautam)<br />
Advancement of mutagen treated genotypes<br />
M3 families of the genotypes Kharchia 65, KRL<br />
99, FLW 2, FLW 5, PBW 524, HD 2189 and<br />
HD 2329/Camm treated with kR 20 and kR<br />
30 gamma rays dose at IARI, New Delhi were<br />
advanced to M4 stage. The M4 families were<br />
screened under stress conditions. A number<br />
of tolerant genotypes were selected for further<br />
evaluation under stress.<br />
Evaluation of M6 families<br />
A number of tolerant as well as sensitive M6<br />
families of the genotypes Kharchia 65, KRL 3-4,<br />
KRL 35, KRL 99, PBW 343, PBW 498, PBW 502<br />
and PBW 509 at gamma rays irradiation dose<br />
of kR 20 and KRL 99 and UP 2338 at dose kR<br />
30 were grown under salt stress conditions. A<br />
number of tolerant and sensitive genotypes<br />
from each family were selected on the basis<br />
of yield and yield contributing traits under<br />
stress, awn characters, maturity, grain colour,<br />
morphological appearances and resistance to<br />
brown and yellow rusts. A few tolerant as well as<br />
early genotypes could be selected from KRL 99,<br />
PBW 343 and PBW 509 families. The variation in<br />
relative tolerance of genotypes within mutagenic<br />
family provides initial indication that mutation<br />
can be used as a tool to improve salt tolerance<br />
trait in wheat.<br />
63
Crop improvement for salinity, alkalinity and waterlogging stresses <strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
Ionic analysis of M5 families<br />
high K concentration and low Na concentration<br />
The tolerant and sensitive mutant families<br />
were also selected among the mutant families of<br />
PBW 498, PBW 509, PBW 343, KRL 99 (Fig. 33)<br />
were screened further for tolerant and sensitive<br />
and KRL 35. In addition, a number of tolerant<br />
genotypes. The range of leaf Na concentration<br />
mutants showing earliness were also selected<br />
among mutants in sodic soil was 0.13 mmol gm -1<br />
among the families of PBW 343, PBW 509 and<br />
to 0.27 mmol gm -1 , whereas the range of leaf K<br />
KRL 3-4. This variability will be studied further<br />
concentration was 0.67 mmol gm -1 to 0.92 mmol<br />
with respect to the genetic studies and its<br />
gm -1 . A number of salt tolerant mutants with<br />
relevance in breeding programme.<br />
PBW 498<br />
PBW 509<br />
PBW 343<br />
KRL 99<br />
Fig. 33: Salt tolerant mutants selected for PBW 498, PBW 509, PBW 343 and KRL 99<br />
Multilocation Evaluation of Breadwheat<br />
Germplasm (Neeraj Kulshreshtha)<br />
One thousand bread wheat germplasm lines<br />
were screened under sodic conditions (pH 9.1).<br />
A lot of genetic variability was observed among<br />
germplasm lines as evident from range and<br />
variance shown for yield attributes . The range<br />
of grain yield plot -1 was from 8-3<strong>11</strong>g with mean<br />
of <strong>11</strong>3g and variance of 2098. Days to heading<br />
ranged from 79 - 131 days with mean 100 and<br />
variance 55. Most of the lines were tall as evident<br />
from plant height mean of <strong>11</strong>7 cm; however,<br />
64
<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
Crop improvement for salinity, alkalinity and waterlogging stresses<br />
it ranged from 70-160 cm. There was a lot of<br />
variability with respect to 1000 grain weight<br />
as it ranged from <strong>11</strong> to 50 g with mean 31 and<br />
variance 32. It showed that there is a lot of scope<br />
to improve grain weight under stress. Variability<br />
shown for different yield attributes also suggest<br />
that there is a great scope of improving different<br />
yield attributes simultaneously to arrive at an<br />
ideal plant type for stress tolerance and high<br />
yield. Twenty five genotypes as shown in Table<br />
38 were found to yield better than Kharchia 65,<br />
however, these genotypes will be studied further<br />
for their potential to become a good source of<br />
salt tolerance.<br />
Table 38 : Sodicity tolerant genotypes selected on the basis of grain yield/plot<br />
S.N. Genotype/IC No. Grain yield<br />
(g/0.45m 2 )<br />
Days to<br />
heading<br />
Plant height (cm)<br />
1000 grain<br />
weight (g)<br />
1 79093 3<strong>11</strong> 90 107 37<br />
2 47349 308 84 108 38<br />
3 104622 268 92 96 29<br />
4 533742 265 92 90 37<br />
5 82209 264 94 <strong>11</strong>5 37<br />
6 107946 241 94 130 29<br />
7 138901 241 91 120 37<br />
8 82216 230 95 133 38<br />
9 532493 229 101 136 35<br />
10 145948 226 88 130 36<br />
<strong>11</strong> 55701 226 140 103 40<br />
12 532343 224 142 139 33<br />
13 534850 224 144 136 37<br />
14 532773 223 146 152 38<br />
15 104581 223 143 133 38<br />
16 532495 221 142 140 43<br />
17 532075 220 143 128 33<br />
18 82453 219 143 134 38<br />
19 532149 218 139 135 28<br />
20 533755 217 153 100 39<br />
21 532743 217 144 132 36<br />
22 104582 217 140 130 39<br />
23 78722 216 144 105 21<br />
24 78802 215 146 105 36<br />
25 534688 215 153 133 31<br />
C1 Kharchia 65 214 101 135 32<br />
C2 HD 4530 43 103 86 29<br />
C3 KRL 19 107 98 90 31<br />
C4 KRL 3-4 243 96 124 35<br />
Mean <strong>11</strong>3 100 <strong>11</strong>7 31<br />
Variance 2098 55 224 32<br />
Range 8-3<strong>11</strong> 79-131 70-160 <strong>11</strong>–50<br />
C1, C2, C3 and C4 means check varieties<br />
65
Crop improvement for salinity, alkalinity and waterlogging stresses <strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
Wheat Improvement for Waterlogging, <strong>Salinity</strong><br />
and Element Toxicities in Australia and India<br />
(Neeraj Kulshreshtha, S.K. Sharma and N.P.S.<br />
Yaduvanshi)<br />
Waterlogging tolerance and ICP/microelement<br />
analyses of key Indian and Australian wheat<br />
varieties<br />
The objective of this study is to demonstrate the<br />
genetic diversity for waterlogging tolerance in<br />
sodic soil among Indian and Australian wheat<br />
varieties. A number of salt tolerant and sensitive<br />
wheat varieties (KRL 3-4, KRL 99, Kharchia 65,<br />
KRL19, KRL 210, NW 1014, Brookton, Ducula<br />
4, DBW 17, HD 2851 and HD2009) were grown<br />
in the sodic microplots, where salt stress levels<br />
were much uniform relative to field conditions<br />
in three replications with 1 m row length of<br />
each plot. One of the set was waterlogged for 15<br />
days after 22 days of sowing while in the other<br />
set, the irrigation water was drained. Similarly,<br />
two sets of the same genotypes were sown<br />
in normal microplots. Waterlogging reduced<br />
the grain yield in both the soils. However, the<br />
percent reduction of many varieties in sodic soils<br />
was more in comparison to normal soil except<br />
KRL 99. In normal soil, the maximum reduction<br />
due to waterlogging was observed in Brookton<br />
followed by HD 2851 and HD 2009. The least<br />
reduction was observed for NW 1014 followed<br />
by KRL 99 and DBW 17. In sodic soils (pH 9.2),<br />
The maximum reduction (53%) was observed for<br />
HD 2851 followed by Ducula 4, Brookton and<br />
HD 2009. The minimum reduction was observed<br />
for KRL 99 followed by KRL 3-4 and KRL 210.<br />
In waterlogged sodic soils, KRL 3-4 was the best<br />
performing followed by KRL 99 and KRL 210. In<br />
case of biomass/plot, the genotypes with per se<br />
performance better than the mean as well as least<br />
reduction under waterlogging in sodic soil were<br />
KRL 3-4, Kharchia 65, KRL 99, KRL 210, KRL 19<br />
and NW 1014. Similarly, the genotypes with least<br />
reduction under waterlogging in normal soil<br />
were DBW 17, NW 1014 Ducula 4 and HD 2009.<br />
Evaluation of varieties for waterlogging<br />
tolerance<br />
The objective of this study is to validate<br />
waterlogging tolerance of wheat varieties in<br />
sodic soils (pH 9.1). A number of salt tolerant<br />
and sensitive wheat varieties (KRL 3-4, KRL<br />
99, Kharchia 65, KRL19, KRL 210, NW 1014,<br />
Brookton, Ducula 4, DBW 17, HD 2851 and<br />
HD2009) were grown in the sodic fields (pH<br />
9.1) with three replications (Table 39). One<br />
of the set was waterlogged for 15 days after<br />
22 days of sowing while in the other set, the<br />
irrigation water was drained. The phenotypic<br />
performance of KRL 3-4, KRL 99, KRL 210 and<br />
Kharchia 65 was better than other genotypes<br />
under waterlogging. Waterlogging reduced the<br />
grain yield by 18 per cent in sodic soils. KRL 3-4<br />
followed by Kharchia 65 and KRL 99 were the top<br />
performers under waterlogging. With respect<br />
to yield reduction, maximum reduction in grain<br />
yield was observed for HD 2851 followed by HD<br />
2009 and DBW 17. Waterlogging also reduced<br />
the plant height of different genotypes with<br />
maximum reduction in HD 2851 (6%) followed<br />
by DBW 17 and Brookton. There was 7 per cent<br />
reduction in tillers/plot under waterlogging in<br />
sodic soils with maximum reduction in Ducula<br />
4 followed by Brookton and HD 2851.<br />
Table 39 : Effect of waterlogging on grain yield (g)<br />
in sodic soils (pH 9.1)<br />
Genotype<br />
Drained WL Reduction<br />
Mean SE Mean SE<br />
(% )<br />
BROOKTON <strong>11</strong>5 2.0 98 3.0 14<br />
DBW 17 130 3.9 99 8.6 24<br />
DUCULA 4 122 5.5 97 4.4 21<br />
HD 2009 124 3.0 79 3.8 36<br />
HD 2851 127 4.5 63 1.7 50<br />
Kh. 65 154 5.8 142 4.8 8<br />
KRL 19 144 2.4 126 4.6 13<br />
KRL 210 154 8.6 138 2.3 <strong>11</strong><br />
KRL 3-4 177 5.9 170 3.0 4<br />
KRL 99 164 3.9 141 4.2 14<br />
NW 1014 138 6.4 120 2.7 13<br />
Mean 140.8 <strong>11</strong>5.8 18<br />
Min <strong>11</strong>4.9 63.2<br />
Max 177.0 170.4<br />
66
<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
Crop improvement for salinity, alkalinity and waterlogging stresses<br />
Single Seed Descent (SSD) approach to increase<br />
waterlogging tolerance using waterlogging<br />
tolerant x disease resistant donors grown in<br />
sodic soils<br />
This is the main breeding program at <strong>CSSRI</strong>,<br />
where suitable parental material is crossed<br />
and selected cross is chosen for further work<br />
according to the SSD schedule. This cross will<br />
be used and developed throughout the project<br />
duration. F 2<br />
population of the three crosses<br />
(PBW 525/KRL 99, KRL 99/FLW 8//PBW 550,<br />
FLW 4/KRL 99//FLW 4) were sown in the sodic<br />
field (pH 9.1) along with parents. The selection<br />
of the cross taken for experimentation was<br />
decided by (i) KRL 99 (a salt and waterlogging<br />
tolerant amber grained genotype with good<br />
plant type) as one of the parent crossed with<br />
one or two disease resistant/high yielding lines<br />
and (ii) and availability of sufficient F 2<br />
seed.<br />
The population was waterlogged for 15 days<br />
after 22 days of sowing. Suitable population<br />
out of these three will be selected for salt and<br />
waterlogging tolerance, disease resistance and<br />
other agronomical traits and will be advanced as<br />
per the protocol. The population was screened<br />
for salt and waterlogging tolerance and the<br />
rust reaction. Out of the three populations, the<br />
performance of PBW 525/KRL 99 was the best<br />
with respect to phenotypic performance under<br />
waterlogging and resistance to rusts. This was<br />
followed by FLW 4/KRL 99//FLW 4. The<br />
population KRL 99/FLW 8//PBW 550 was the<br />
least performing. The population of PBW 525/<br />
KRL 99 will be advanced as per the protocol.<br />
Bi-plot/cluster analyses of Indian and<br />
Australian wheat varieties/germplasm lines<br />
grown in waterlogged sodic soil.<br />
The bi-plot analysis/cluster analysis was carried<br />
out to identify parental material for future<br />
programmes under different conditions. This<br />
study will be useful in evaluation of genetic<br />
variability in Indian/Australian material and<br />
also help in identifying contrasting parents for<br />
different types of soil / production conditions of<br />
wheat in India. In this experiment, one hundred<br />
promising genotypes/released varieties of wheat<br />
were pooled from <strong>CSSRI</strong>, Karnal (material for<br />
salinity tolerance/intolerance), DWR, Karnal<br />
(material for yield attributes, rusts, leaf blight and<br />
Karnal bunt) and NDUA&T, Faizabad (material<br />
for waterlogging conditions and element efficient,<br />
if any) and are being evaluated in waterlogged as<br />
well as drained sodic soils (pH 9.1) in augmented<br />
design with 2 blocks (each block comprised of 8<br />
checks and 50 entries). The checks were KRL 3-4,<br />
KRL 19, HD 2009, Kharchia 65, DBW 17, PBW<br />
550, PBW 343 and DBW 14. A lot of variability<br />
was observed among the checks and test<br />
varieties with respect to waterlogging tolerance<br />
and per se performance under waterlogging.<br />
Among the check varieties, DBW 14 showed<br />
maximum reduction in grain yield (75 %) under<br />
waterlogging followed by PBW 550 and HD<br />
2009. Kharchia 65 reported minimum reduction<br />
followed by KRL 3-4 and KRL 19. The ranking<br />
of varieties differed with respect to grain yield<br />
under both the environments. This is evident<br />
from the list of top ten (Table 40) and bottom ten<br />
(Table 41) yielders in drained as well as sodic<br />
soils.<br />
Physiology in waterlogging tolerance<br />
The main aim of this project was to evaluate<br />
waterlogging tolerance and microelement<br />
analyses of wheat (~10 varieties) grown in pots<br />
Table 40 : Top ten genotypes in the drained and<br />
waterlogged sodic soils from biplot,<br />
cluster analysis experiment with respect<br />
to grain yield plot -1<br />
S.N. Drained Waterlogged<br />
1 KRL 259 KRL 259<br />
2 NW-4035 KRL 240<br />
3 KRL 210 KRL 105<br />
4 KRL 240 KRL 268<br />
5 NW-4081 HD 3028<br />
6 KRL 283 KRL 238<br />
7 NW-4018 KRL 283<br />
8 KRL 229 HD 2985<br />
9 GUTHA KRL 99<br />
10 KRL 1-4 KRL 35<br />
67
Crop improvement for salinity, alkalinity and waterlogging stresses <strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
Table 41 :<br />
Bottom ten genotypes in the drained<br />
and waterlogged sodic soils from<br />
biplot, cluster analysis experiment<br />
with respect to grain yield plot -1<br />
S.N. Drained Waterlogged<br />
1<br />
2<br />
3<br />
4<br />
5<br />
6<br />
7<br />
8<br />
9<br />
10<br />
NW-2036 PBW 642<br />
HD 2997 PBW 636<br />
CAMM PBW 639<br />
PBW 642 PBW 635<br />
SCHOMBURGK<br />
NWL-7-4<br />
CHIRYA 7 CHIRYA 7<br />
CHARA PBW 634<br />
PBW 635<br />
DBW 50<br />
NW-3069<br />
NWL-9-22<br />
AMERY HI 1563<br />
in reclaimed (pH 8.2) and sodic soils (pH 9.3).<br />
These data were also compared to waterlogging<br />
tolerance of same varieties in the field or<br />
microplots to enable us to validate the use of pots<br />
in characterising germplasm. All the three stress<br />
treatments ((1) normal drained (N), (2) Normal<br />
+ WL (N+WL), (3) Sodic (S) and (4) Sodic + WL<br />
(S+WL)) caused significant reduction in the grain<br />
yield of all the varieties of wheat over control<br />
with sodicity + WL causing the maximum<br />
reduction. Significant genotypic variation was<br />
observed for grain yield and biomass under the<br />
stress treatments and Brookton, HD 2009, HD<br />
2851 and Ducula 4 were the poorest performers<br />
on the overall mean basis.<br />
Maximum deleterious effects on grain yield were<br />
observed under sodicity (67% reduction over<br />
control) followed by WL superimposed over<br />
sodicity (60.8% reduction), and WL in neutral pH<br />
(39.7% reduction), whereas the relative per cent<br />
reductions for biomass for the same treatments<br />
were 67.2, 53.0 and 41.9, respectively. Plant<br />
biomass and grain yield were reduced similarly<br />
by sodicity resulting in the lowest harvest<br />
index. Number of grains was reduced by all the<br />
three stress treatments with sodicity causing the<br />
maximum detrimental effects. 100 grain weight<br />
was reduced with maximum reduction observed<br />
under sodicity+WL followed by sodicity and<br />
waterlogging in neutral pH (7.8). Sodicity+ WL<br />
also had the most detrimental effects on the<br />
plant height, total number of tillers, productive<br />
tillers and redox potential. KRL 3-4 and Kharchia<br />
65 produced maximum biomass and grain<br />
yield. Removal of water from the normal and<br />
sodic soils led to recovery, which was quicker<br />
in neutral soil, while it took a longer time in<br />
sodic soils. Therefore, sodic soils tend to suffer<br />
longer from the effects of waterlogging and the<br />
accompanying lower redox potentials.<br />
Plants were sampled and separated into top<br />
three leaves, remaining leaves, stem and<br />
earheads for elemental analysis. Top three<br />
leaves including the flag leaf were analysed for<br />
all the elements by ICP. Na concentration was<br />
found to be higher in the upper three leaves<br />
from sodic and sodic and WL treatment which<br />
were at par. K concentration were observed to<br />
be highest in sodic +WL treatment and were<br />
in the order of S+WL > Sodic > N+WL > N. Ca<br />
concentrations showed a marginal decline in<br />
sodic and sodic +WL treatments as compared<br />
to neutral pH and neutral pH +WL treatments,<br />
Fig. 34 : Validation of results on grain yield (GY) of wheat between pots and microplots under waterlogged sodic (a) and<br />
drained sodic (b) conditions<br />
68
<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
Crop improvement for salinity, alkalinity and waterlogging stresses<br />
while the three stress treatments did not have<br />
any effect on Mg concentrations. Comparison<br />
of the grain yield data of the similar set of<br />
ten genotypes from pots to the microplots<br />
sodic conditions showed good correlations<br />
(Fig. 34).<br />
The genotypes KRL 3-4, KRL 99 and Kharchia 65<br />
showed good waterlogging tolerance in different<br />
experiments. Among Indian and Australian<br />
genotypes, a lot of variability was observed with<br />
respect to waterlogging tolerance in sodic soils.<br />
Out of the three populations studied in sodic<br />
soils, the performance of PBW 525/KRL 99 was<br />
the best with respect to phenotypic performance<br />
under waterlogging and resistance to rusts.<br />
Improvement of Salt Tolerance in Wheat using<br />
Molecular Approach (Neeraj Kulshreshtha, P.C<br />
Sharma, S. K Sharma)<br />
One hundred twenty fixed Recombinant<br />
Inbred Lines (RILs) of the cross Kharchia 65<br />
(Salt tolerant) x HD 2009 (Salt sensitive) were<br />
screened and evaluated for phenotyping in<br />
the <strong>CSSRI</strong> sodic microplots at pH 2<br />
9.1 in an<br />
augmented design with four checks. Kharchia<br />
65 performed best among the checks followed<br />
by KRL 19, HD 2009 and HD 2851 with respect<br />
to grain yield plant -1 . The RILs displayed a lot<br />
of variability among inbred lines with respect<br />
to grain yield, sodium and potassium uptake.<br />
The grain yield plant -1 among the RILs ranged<br />
from 8.45g to 0.65g, mean of 3.60, whereas the<br />
K/Na ratio among the RILs ranged from 2.16 to<br />
0.13 with a mean of 0.91 (Table 42 a). The top<br />
tolerant 10 RIL, top 10 sensitive, top 10 high K/<br />
Table 42 a : Performance of checks and RILs<br />
(Overall)<br />
Checks<br />
Grain yield<br />
plant -1 (g)<br />
Tolerance<br />
index<br />
K/Na<br />
Kharchia 65 6.06 0.94 1.14<br />
HD 2009 2.24 0.37 0.73<br />
KRL 19 3.54 0.58 0.96<br />
HD 2851 2.16 0.33 0.82<br />
RILs<br />
Mean 3.60 0.68 0.91<br />
SD 1.52 0.16 0.36<br />
Na and top 10 low K/Na are given in table 42 b,<br />
c, d and e.<br />
Table 42 b : Performance of tolerant RILs (Top 10)<br />
Genotypes<br />
Grain yield<br />
plant -1 (g)<br />
Tolerance<br />
index<br />
MP 1-69 8.45 0.95<br />
MP 1-57 7.45 0.88<br />
MP 1-<strong>11</strong>9 6.75 0.76<br />
MP 1-94 6.63 0.88<br />
MP 1-90 6.43 0.90<br />
MP 1-28 6.18 0.83<br />
MP 1-81 6.03 0.86<br />
MP 1-73 6.03 0.83<br />
MP 1-53 5.95 0.83<br />
MP 1-<strong>11</strong>5 5.85 0.72<br />
Table 42 c : Performance of sensitive RILs (Top 10)<br />
Genotypes<br />
Grain yield<br />
plant -1 (g)<br />
Tolerance<br />
index<br />
MP 1-<strong>11</strong>0 0.65 0.24<br />
MP 1-41 0.68 0.25<br />
MP 1-32 0.78 0.34<br />
MP 1-38 0.88 0.42<br />
MP 1-48 1.08 0.47<br />
MP 1-18 1.20 0.41<br />
MP 1-17 1.20 0.35<br />
MP 1-95 1.33 0.60<br />
MP 1-31 1.38 0.40<br />
MP 1-6 1.40 0.40<br />
Table 42 d : Performance of RILs with high K/Na<br />
(Overall)<br />
Genotypes<br />
Grain yield<br />
plant -1 (g)<br />
Tolerance<br />
index<br />
K/Na<br />
MP 1-26 3.8 0.67 2.16<br />
MP 1-4 3.5 0.69 1.90<br />
MP 1-8 2.1 0.81 1.72<br />
MP 1-<strong>11</strong>3 2.4 0.94 1.72<br />
MP 1-24 2.3 0.55 1.72<br />
MP 1-54 2.9 0.66 1.68<br />
MP 1-49 4.4 0.57 1.62<br />
MP 1-106 2.0 0.67 1.57<br />
MP 1-9 4.7 0.67 1.54<br />
MP 1-76 4.7 0.80 1.51<br />
69
Crop improvement for salinity, alkalinity and waterlogging stresses <strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
Table 42 e : Performance of RILs with low K/Na<br />
(Overall)<br />
Genotypes<br />
Grain yield<br />
plant -1 (g)<br />
Tolerance<br />
index<br />
K/Na<br />
MP 1-105 4.1 0.83 0.13<br />
MP 1-35 2.8 0.45 0.20<br />
MP 1-71 3.8 0.71 0.41<br />
MP 1-97 1.7 0.40 0.42<br />
MP 1-3 1.8 0.44 0.44<br />
MP 1-64 3.3 0.69 0.45<br />
MP 1-96 2.1 0.39 0.45<br />
MP 1-<strong>11</strong>0 0.7 0.24 0.47<br />
MP 1-90 6.4 0.90 0.47<br />
MP 1-91 5.2 0.99 0.48<br />
Search for Wheat Materials Tolerant to Sodicity<br />
and Zinc Deficiency Stresses (Ali Qadar and<br />
Neeraj Kulshreshtha)<br />
Total zinc (Zn) in soil often ranges from 40-80<br />
ppm, but DTPA extractable zinc (Zn) is often<br />
low in sodic soils and Zn is invariably applied<br />
to meet the crop requirement. This is practiced<br />
irrespective of the variety under cultivation in<br />
sodic soils. There may be differences in potential<br />
to mine Zn in sodic soils among wheat genotypes.<br />
Twenty two genotypes of wheat comprising<br />
tetraploid and hexaploid materials were sown<br />
on 17-<strong>11</strong>-2009 in 10 kg capacity pots filled with<br />
soil of pH 2<br />
9.0 with and without added Zn. Zinc<br />
was added @ 10 kg ha -1 using ZnSO 4<br />
7H 2<br />
O.<br />
DTPA extractable Zn in the soil was 1.1 ppm,<br />
whereas it was 0.8 ppm in control (without Zn).<br />
Phosphorus was not applied, as it is known to<br />
influence the availability and utilization of Zn<br />
within the plants. Fourteen seeds were sown<br />
in each pot and each treatment was replicated<br />
four times. There was no effect on the number<br />
of emerged seedlings in response to applied Zn.<br />
However, some of the materials (KRL 3-4, NW-<br />
1014) showed chlorotic symptoms on the leaves<br />
after about 18-20 days after emergence of the<br />
seedlings followed by death of the leaves . These<br />
symptoms were similar in appearance to those<br />
reported in the literature under Zn deficiency.<br />
Zn concentration in the seed of KRL 3-4 was<br />
43.3 ppm (analysed before sowing). Many other<br />
materials like KRL 19, which had even less Zn<br />
(37.2 ppm) did not show such symptoms. This<br />
problem in KRL 3-4 was also observed during<br />
early stage of seedling growth in current study<br />
(<strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong>), which is under progress. However,<br />
at later stages, these types of symptoms were<br />
not observed on new leaves. Few genotypes did<br />
show P deficiency symptoms especially at the<br />
end of December, 2009 and beginning of January,<br />
<strong>2010</strong> when pot soil temperature was hovering<br />
around 6-7 ºC. Overall plant growth was affected<br />
because of sodicity, Zn and P deficiencies.<br />
Several materials including Kharchia-65, KRL<br />
3-4, PBW 343, KRL 210, DBW 17 responded to<br />
Zn fertilization in terms of shoot dry weight and<br />
grain yield (Table 43), whereas KRL 2-3. NW<br />
1014, Brookton and KRL 19 did not respond to<br />
added Zn indicating their potential to tolerate<br />
Zn deficiency stress. Tetraploid varieties known<br />
to be sensitive to sodicity and Zn deficiency<br />
stress showed overall poor growth, however<br />
KRL 297 did not respond to added Zn.<br />
Table 43 : Grain yield (g pot -1 ) of wheat genotypes without (0.8ppm) and with added Zn (1.1 ppm) in sodic<br />
soil<br />
Genotype pH 2<br />
9.0 Genotype pH 2<br />
9.0<br />
-Zn +Zn -Zn +Zn<br />
Kharchia 65 0.273 ± 0.025 1.687 ± 0.361 HD 2009 1.261 ± 0.072 2.107 ± 0.604<br />
KRL 19 1.700 ± 0.387 1.923 ± 0.353 DBW 17 1.182 ± 0.201 2.387 ± 0.272<br />
KRL 210 1.493 ± 0.313 2.297 ± 0.534 HD 2285 1.759 ± 0.440 2.074 ± 0.486<br />
KRL 3-4 1.613 ± 0.342 2.268 ± 0.240 HD 2851 1.499 ± 0.<strong>11</strong>9 3.245 ± 0.275<br />
NW 1014 2.479 ± 0.404 2.532 ± 0.353 Brookton 2.313 ± 0.425 2.210± 0.156<br />
PBW 343 0.910 ± 0.036 2.859 ± 0.522 KRL 297* 1.333 ± 0.355 1.249 ± 0.377<br />
DW 1 1.316 ± 0.375 3.314 ± 0.480 HD 4530* 0.401 ± 0.147 0.936 ± 0.124<br />
± Sample standard deviation * Tetraploid wheat genotypes<br />
70
<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
Crop improvement for salinity, alkalinity and waterlogging stresses<br />
Evaluation of advanced breeding lines in semiarid<br />
saline soils at Hisar<br />
Eighty four breeding lines including five checks<br />
(CS 52, CS 54, CS 56, Kranti and Varuna) were<br />
evaluated for seed yield and other characters in<br />
screening trials in semi -arid saline soils at Bir<br />
forest farm, Hisar. Seed yield ranged from (0.75<br />
to 2.85 t ha -1 ). Sixteen lines gave higher yield<br />
over the best check Varuna (1.91 t ha -1 ) with<br />
2100-3-6 (2.85 t ha -1 ) followed by 700-2-1-6 (2.36<br />
t ha -1 ) recording maximum yield. Twelve lines<br />
recorded more than 2.00 t ha -1 yield.<br />
Comparative growth of wheat genotypes after a month of<br />
sowing<br />
Several materials including Kharchia-65, KRL<br />
3-4, PBW 343, KRL 210, DBW 17 responded to<br />
Zn fertilization. NW 1014, Brookton, KRL 19<br />
and KRL 297 (tetraploid) showed potential to<br />
tolerate Zn deficiency stress under soil pH 2<br />
9.0<br />
Development of Salt Tolerant High Yielding<br />
Genotypes of Indian Mustard (Brassica juncea)<br />
(P.C. Sharma and S.L. Krishna Murthy)<br />
Evaluation of advanced breeding lines (IVT<br />
and AVT) in semi–reclaimed alkali soils<br />
Seventy three genotypes including five checks<br />
(CS 52, CS 54, CS 56, Kranti and Varuna) were<br />
evaluated in IVT for seed yield and other<br />
characters in reclaimed alkali soils at <strong>CSSRI</strong>,<br />
Karnal. Seed yield ranged from 0.93 to 2.79 t ha -1 .<br />
Thirty seven lines out yielded the best checks<br />
Kranti and Varuna with 13000-2-2-2-1-2 (2.79 t<br />
ha -1 ) and 13000-3-1-1-4-1 (2.56 t ha -1 ) recording<br />
the maximum yield.<br />
In AVT, eighty four breeding lines along with<br />
five checks (CS52, CS54, CS56, Kranti and<br />
Varuna) were evaluated for seed yield and<br />
other characters in reclaimed alkali soils. Seed<br />
yield varied from (1.41 to 2.75 t ha -1 ). Out of<br />
these, eight lines recorded significantly higher<br />
yield over the best check Kranti. Forty two lines<br />
out yielded the check Varuna with CS 6<strong>11</strong>-1-6-1<br />
(2.75 t ha -1 ) followed by CS 15000-1-2-2-2-2 (2.49<br />
t ha -1 ). Twelve lines yielded more than 2.00 t<br />
ha -1 .<br />
Evaluation of promising salt tolerant strains of<br />
Indian mustard (Brassica juncea) in All India<br />
Coordinated Trial on Rapeseed Mustard<br />
Performance of mustard strains in IVT saline/<br />
alkaline conditions screening nursery<br />
Twelve genotypes were evaluated under<br />
salinity stress in IVT under saline conditions<br />
(EC e<br />
~10 dS m -1 ) at experimental farm, Hisar and<br />
Karnal and under alkaline conditions (pH 2<br />
~9.2)<br />
at experimental farm, Karnal. Significant<br />
differences were observed in seed yield amongst<br />
the genotypes evaluated, both under salinity<br />
and alkalinity stresses. Under salinity stress,<br />
seed yield ranged from 1.36 to 2.15 t ha -1 at<br />
Hisar and 1.16 to 2.50 t ha -1 at Karnal. Genotypes<br />
CSCN-09-6 (2.15 t ha -1 ) followed by CSCN-09-12<br />
(2.13 t ha -1 ) and CSCN-09-12 (2.13 t ha -1 ) at Hisar<br />
and CSCN-09-8 (2.50 t ha -1 ) followed by CSCN-<br />
09-3 (2.23 t ha -1 ) at Karnal showed highest seed<br />
yield. Further, genotype CSCN-09-9 showed<br />
minimum seed yield at both the places (Hisar,<br />
Karnal). Under alkalinity stress at Karnal, seed<br />
yield ranged from 0.32 to 0.97 t ha -1 . Genotypes<br />
CSCN-09-1 (0.97 t ha -1 ) followed by CSCN-<br />
09-6 (0.94 t ha -1 ) showed highest yield whereas<br />
genotype CSCN-09-9 (0.32 t ha -1 ) recorded<br />
minimum seed yield.<br />
Performance of mustard strains in AVT saline/<br />
alkaline conditions screening nursery<br />
Six genotypes were evaluated under salinity and<br />
alkalinity stress in AVT at experimental farm<br />
Hisar and Karnal. Significant differences were<br />
observed in seed yield amongst the genotypes<br />
evaluated. Under salinity stress, genotypes<br />
CSCN-09-14 (1.84 t ha -1 ) followed by CSCN-09-<br />
71
Crop improvement for salinity, alkalinity and waterlogging stresses <strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
13 (1.76 t ha -1 ) at Hisar and CSCN-09-16 (2.<strong>11</strong><br />
t ha -1 ) followed by CSCN-09-18 (1.89 t ha -1 ) at<br />
Karnal showed highest seed yield. Further,<br />
genotypes CSCN-09-18 (1.69 t ha -1 ) and CSCN-<br />
09-13 (1.66 t ha -1 ) showed minimum seed yield at<br />
Hisar and Karnal respectively. Under alkalinity<br />
stress at Karnal, seed yield ranged from 0.65 to<br />
0. 83 t ha -1 . Genotypes CSCN-09-18 (0.83 t ha -1 )<br />
followed by CSCN-09-13 (0.79 t ha -1 ) showed<br />
highest yield whereas genotype CSCN-09-16<br />
(0.65 t ha -1 ) recorded minimum seed yield.<br />
Evaluation of segregating material in mustard<br />
Four mustard populations namely i. e., Krishna<br />
X CS 52, CS 52 x Krishna, Krishna X CS 54 and CS<br />
54 X Krishna were evaluated. Two hundred sixty<br />
five lines were evaluated under the cross Krishna<br />
X CS 52 and one hundred thirty seven lines<br />
were selected based upon the yield for further<br />
evaluation. Hundred lines were evaluated for<br />
the cross CS 52 x Krishna. Out of these lines,<br />
forty lines were selected for further evaluation.<br />
Four hundred sixty lines were evaluated for the<br />
cross CS 54 X Krishna. Out of these lines, one<br />
hundred eleven lines were selected for further<br />
evaluation. Three hundred twenty five lines of<br />
the cross Krishna X CS 54 were evaluated. From<br />
these lines, one hundred thirty seven lines were<br />
selected for further evaluation.<br />
Cereal Systems Initiative for South Asia<br />
(CSISA) – Objective 2 (Strategic Experimental<br />
Plat forms for Future Cereal Systems) (National<br />
Agricultural <strong>Research</strong> team) : D.K. Sharma,<br />
P.C. Sharma, N.P.S. Yaduvanshi and H.S. Jat;<br />
CGIAR team: M. Gathala, Y.P.S. Saharawat, V.<br />
Kumar and J.K. Ladha)<br />
Developing crop and resource management<br />
practices for sustainable future cereal based<br />
systems<br />
The project aims to devise strategies to reorient<br />
the rice-wheat cropping system in Indo-Gangetic<br />
Plains keeping into consideration the declining<br />
yields, depleting natural resources, climatic<br />
changes and water and labour shortages being<br />
faced by the present day agriculture. Further,<br />
objective is to design next generation of cereal<br />
systems that are highly productive, resource<br />
efficient, sustainable, and adapted to the<br />
expected changes in environment and socioeconomic<br />
endowments. This research will be<br />
conducted by National Agricultural <strong>Research</strong><br />
(NARES) partners in collaboration with IRRI and<br />
CIMMYT using closely monitored experimental<br />
platforms at selected locations which are<br />
also used as hubs for delivery and adaptive<br />
research. The experimental platforms would be<br />
near-production scale long-term experiments<br />
designed to assess the performance of different<br />
agricultural systems, using a wide range of<br />
indicators. Four scenarios have been planned<br />
for research platform at <strong>CSSRI</strong>, Karnal.<br />
During rabi 2009-10, wheat was sown in all the<br />
four scenarios with cv. PBW 47 in scenario I and<br />
DBW 17 in scenarios II, III and IV. Significant<br />
differences in seed yield was recorded amongst<br />
different scenarios, however, scenarios II, III<br />
and IV did not differ significantly amongst<br />
themselves. During summer <strong>2010</strong>, fields in<br />
scenario I were kept fallow, whereas mungbean<br />
(cv. SML 668) was sown after wheat harvesting<br />
in scenarios II, III and IV on 24.4.<strong>2010</strong>. One<br />
picking of the mungbean pods was taken in<br />
scenario II, whereas no picking was done in<br />
scenarios III and IV. The standing mungbean<br />
crop was knocked down and the whole biomass<br />
was retained in the field itself. Direct seeded rice<br />
was taken up in scenario III and maize was taken<br />
up in scenario IV. As per the plan outlined for<br />
different scenarios, all residues were removed<br />
both in rice (kharif 2009) and wheat (rabi 2009-10)<br />
in scenario I (Table 44). In scenario II, anchored<br />
residue (30%) of rice (kharif 2009) and wheat<br />
(rabi 2009-10) and 100% residue of mungbean<br />
was incorporated in field in successive crops. In<br />
scenarios III and IV, 100% residue of rice (kharif<br />
2009), 30% anchored residue of wheat (rabi 2009-<br />
10) and 100% residue of mungbean was retained<br />
in field in successive crops. In this way, around<br />
9 tonne residue was added in a year in field in<br />
scenario II and around 14-15 tonne residue was<br />
added in a year’s time in scenarios III and IV.<br />
During kharif <strong>2010</strong>, rice cv. Pusa 44 seedlings<br />
were transplanted in scenario I as per farmers’<br />
practice on 7.7.<strong>2010</strong>. In scenario II, rice cv. Arize<br />
6444 seedlings were transplanted on 28.6.<strong>2010</strong>.<br />
In scenario III, rice cv. Arize 6129 was directly<br />
sown using turbo seeder on 18.6.<strong>2010</strong>. Maize<br />
cv. NK 6240 was directly sown using multicrop<br />
planter in scenario IV on 6.7.<strong>2010</strong>. Nonsignificant<br />
differences were recorded in rice and<br />
maize yields in different scenarios (Table 45).<br />
72
<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
Crop improvement for salinity, alkalinity and waterlogging stresses<br />
Table 44 : Residue applied in different crop season scenarios<br />
Scenario<br />
Performance of rice in scenarios I, II, III and maize in scenario IV during kharif <strong>2010</strong>.<br />
Rice in wheat<br />
2009-10<br />
Residue carried over in successive crop (t ha -1 )<br />
Wheat in green gram<br />
<strong>2010</strong><br />
Green gram in rice<br />
<strong>2010</strong><br />
Rice in wheat<br />
<strong>2010</strong><br />
1 Removed Removed Fallow Removed<br />
2 4.20 3.50 2.59 4.<strong>11</strong><br />
3 9.39 3.60 2.20 10.20<br />
4 10.00 3.50 2.08 13.70<br />
Table 45 : Crop productivity in different scenarios during 2009-10 cropping season<br />
Crop yield (t ha -1 )<br />
Scenario<br />
Wheat rabi 2009-10 Green gram <strong>2010</strong> Rice kharif <strong>2010</strong><br />
System (rice<br />
equivalent)<br />
1 4.99 - 8.00 13.32<br />
2 5.48 0.66 8.71 16.99<br />
3 5.53 0.00 7.97 13.86<br />
4 5.50 0.00 7.<strong>11</strong> 12.44<br />
LSD (5%) 0.23 - NS 1.18<br />
However, significant differences in system yield<br />
in a year was observed on rice equivalent basis.<br />
Irrigation water applied was measured in all the<br />
four scenarios and water productivity was also<br />
computed accordingly. Water applied (327–346<br />
mm) during wheat season 2009-10 did not differ<br />
significantly in different scenarios, whereas<br />
water productivity differed significantly (1.45<br />
kg grain m -3 water in scenario I and 1.63 to1.68<br />
in scenarios II, III and IV). Further, water<br />
applied differed significantly amongst different<br />
scenarios in rice crop <strong>2010</strong>. In scenario I, 1943 mm<br />
total water was applied whereas in scenarios II<br />
and III, it was 1352 and 1341 mm. In scenario IV<br />
maize, 126 mm water was applied during kharif<br />
<strong>2010</strong>.<br />
73
<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
AGROFORESTRY IN SALT AFFECTED SOILS<br />
Evaluation of Biosaline Agroforestry systems<br />
for Dry Regions (R.K. Yadav, J.C. Dagar,<br />
Khajanchi Lal, Gajender Yadav, and C.B.<br />
Pandey)<br />
The project initiated in 2008 at Bir Forest <strong>Research</strong><br />
Farm of <strong>CSSRI</strong> at Hisar, was continued during<br />
the period under report. Field experiments on<br />
agro-horticulture with clusterbean–mustard<br />
cropping system in karonda (Carissa carandas),<br />
aonla (Emblica officinalis) and bael (Aegle marmelos);<br />
agro-forestry with pearl millet–mustard,<br />
pearl millet-barley, Aloe vera and para grass<br />
in Prosopis alba and agri-silviculture with mix<br />
grass in Ailanthus excelsa and Acacia ampliceps<br />
were continued with the objective of assessing<br />
their performance on sandy loam soils of semiarid<br />
region with availability of only saline<br />
groundwater as source of irrigation.<br />
The three horticultural tree species were initially<br />
established with four irrigation methods<br />
comprising of T 1<br />
- traditional ring method using<br />
low salinity (3.5 to 4.0 dS m -1 ) groundwater; T 2<br />
–<br />
furrow irrigation with low salinity groundwater;<br />
T 3<br />
– furrow irrigation with alternate use of low<br />
and high salinity groundwater and T 4<br />
–furrow<br />
irrigation with high salinity (8-10 dS m -1 )<br />
groundwater. The forestry species of Prosopis<br />
alba, Ailanthus excelsa and Acacia ampliceps were<br />
established in rainy season of 2009 with furrow<br />
irrigation of low (T 2<br />
), alternate use of low and<br />
high (T 3<br />
), and high saline (T 4<br />
) groundwater<br />
after monsoon. However, during last year, the<br />
irrigation treatments T 1<br />
and T 2<br />
were combined as<br />
T 2<br />
, while T 3<br />
and T 4<br />
remained as such treatments<br />
in agro-horticulture and Prosopis alba based agroforestry.<br />
In mix grass with Ailanthus excelsa and<br />
Acacia ampliceps silvi-pasture system only two<br />
irrigations of high salinity groundwater were<br />
given during May and December.<br />
Performance of horticultural species in terms<br />
of fruit yield indicated the highest yield of bael<br />
with 3.98, 3.36 and 2.08 t ha -1 in T 2<br />
, T 3<br />
and T 4<br />
,<br />
respectively. It was followed by karonda with<br />
respective yields of 1.68, 1.46 and 1.34 t ha -1 and<br />
aonla with 0.52, 0.38 and 0.26 t ha -1 . The grain and<br />
straw yield of companion mustard-clusterbean<br />
is shown in Table 46. Yield of mustard was<br />
relatively better in aonla followed by karonda<br />
and bael but in case of clusterbean, the highest<br />
yield was recorded in bael followed by aonla was<br />
recorded in bael followed by aonla and karonda.<br />
The effect of saline water irrigation was higher<br />
in mustard than clusterbean. The yield level in<br />
clusterbean was low because of the excess rainfall<br />
during the crop growth period resulting in poor<br />
germination and crop stand establishment.<br />
In Prosopis based pearl millet–mustard, pearl<br />
millet-barley, Aloe vera and para grass in<br />
Table 46 : Grain and straw yield of mustard (CS 56) and cluster bean (local) under different tree species<br />
Tree sp. Irrigation method Mustard yield (t ha -1 ) Cluster bean yield (t ha -1 )<br />
Grain Straw Grain Straw<br />
Karonda Low salinity (T2) 1.24 2.57 0.80 1.47<br />
Alternate low & high salinity(T3) 1.20 2.50 0.74 1.38<br />
High salinity (T4) 1.02 2.40 0.72 1.30<br />
Mean 1.16 2.49 0.75 1.38<br />
Aonla Low salinity (T2) 1.64 3.30 0.98 1.69<br />
Alternate low & high salinity(T3) 1.56 3.21 0.92 1.64<br />
High salinity (T4) 1.47 3.32 0.86 1.56<br />
Mean 1.56 3.28 0.92 1.63<br />
Bael Low salinity (T2) 1.06 2.25 1.03 1.84<br />
Alternate low & high salinity(T3) 1.13 2.44 0.94 1.73<br />
High salinity (T4) 0.98 2.17 0.96 1.75<br />
Mean 1.05 2.29 0.97 1.77<br />
Note : Agroforestry system initiated this year only<br />
74
<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
Agroforestry in salt affected soils<br />
Prosopis alba, the yield of pearl millet was 2.78,<br />
2.59 and 2.14 t ha -1 , respectively in irrigation<br />
with low salinity, alternate use of low and high<br />
salinity and high salinity groundwater. The<br />
respective fresh and dry biomass yield of para<br />
grass was 16.24, 14.86 and 12.93 t ha -1 , and 3.95,<br />
3.87 and 3.72 t ha -1 . While Aloe vera has not been<br />
harvested so far. An increase of about 68 per cent<br />
in fresh biomass of mix grass in Ailanthus excelsa<br />
and Acacia ampliceps silvi-pastoral system was<br />
recorded with two irrigations of high salinity<br />
water in comparison to no irrigation.<br />
Bael produced maximum yield with 3-6 dS m -1<br />
salinity irrigation water followed by karonda.<br />
However, yield of companion mustard-cluster<br />
bean was better with aonla and karonda.<br />
Control of Waterlogging and <strong>Salinity</strong> through<br />
Agro forestry Interventions (J.C. Dagar, Jeet<br />
Ram, Khajanchi Lal and S.K. Chaudhari)<br />
To suggest tree plantation model for control of<br />
water logging and salinity through appropriate<br />
plantations, field experiments at farmer’s field<br />
at Puthi (Hisar) were initiated in 2008 and<br />
continued in <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong>. The project area is land<br />
locked and bounded by two parallel canals<br />
(Mithathal and Jui) feeder in the east, Sunder<br />
Canal in the north and west and the Bass-Puthi<br />
road in the South. The area faces waterlogging<br />
almost during the whole year because of canal<br />
seepage, absence of natural drainage and low<br />
abstraction of groundwater due to its marginal<br />
quality. To deal with the problem of waterlogging<br />
and soil salinity, cloned Eucalyptus were raised<br />
on narrow ridges of field boundaries in different<br />
spacing (1mx1m, 1mx2m and 1mx3m) in North-<br />
South and East-West directions.<br />
From the project area, 22 soil profile samples<br />
were collected and analyzed for various physical<br />
and chemical characteristics. <strong>Soil</strong>s were found<br />
to be saline sodic with dominance of chloride<br />
and bicarbonates of sodium. Data collected on<br />
tree performance in different spacing indicated<br />
that both the tree height and diameter at breast<br />
height were the maximum in 1mx3m followed<br />
by 1mx2m and minimum in 1mx1m. However,<br />
the total tree wood biomass was in the reverse<br />
order. The average transpiration rate of two<br />
year Eucalyptus was found to be 15.6, 16.7 and<br />
Fig 35: Effect of tree spacing on water table draw down<br />
18.7 litres per day per tree in 1mx1m, 1mx2m<br />
and 1mx3m spacing, respectively. The results<br />
indicated that there was only slight increase in<br />
tree performance and transpiration rate with<br />
increasing spacing but the number of trees were<br />
3 and 2 times less in 1mx3m and 1mx2m spacing<br />
compared to 1mx1m spacing. Consequently,<br />
Eucalyptus trees in 1m x 1m spacing had higher<br />
biodrainage potential to lower the water table<br />
compared to wider spacing (Fig. 35). Tree<br />
plantation also lowered the soil pH and electrical<br />
conductivity of the soil compare to field without<br />
plantation. The crop cutting data revealed that<br />
the wheat grain yields were 206, 264, 280 and<br />
274 g m -2 in control, 1mx1m, 1mx2m and 1mx3m<br />
spacing, respectively.<br />
Effect of Water and <strong>Salinity</strong> Stress on the<br />
Performance of Tree Species (S.K. Chaudhari<br />
and C.B. Pandey)<br />
For evaluating the water requirement of tree<br />
species viz; Prosopis alba, Prosopis juliflora,<br />
Acacia nilotica, Tamarix articulata, and Eucalyptus<br />
in relation to soil and water salinity,<br />
the experiments were conducted with the<br />
objectives viz; i) To evaluate the irrigation water<br />
requirement of tree species under lysimetric<br />
condition; ii) To study the water and salt<br />
dynamics under varying moisture regimes; iii)<br />
To study the effect of water and salt stress on<br />
soil hydro-physical properties; iv) To study<br />
N-mineralisation and microbial biomass carbon<br />
behaviour under tree species. The results of the<br />
experiments are presented below :<br />
Height of Prosopis alba and Prosopis juliflora<br />
Results showed that the soil pH, water quality<br />
and irrigation schedules did not influence<br />
the height of Prosopis alba significantly upto<br />
the first six months and thereafter, the height<br />
75
Agroforestry in salt affected soils <strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
varied significantly. After nine months from<br />
the planting, irrigation schedule of IW/CPE 1.0<br />
recorded 188 cm average tree height, which was<br />
significantly superior over IW/CPE 0.5 on the<br />
soil with pH 9.6. However, at soil pH 7.5 and<br />
8.5, tree height was not influenced significantly.<br />
Water quality also showed significant effect<br />
only at pH 9.6, where normal water irrigation<br />
gave 18 cm plant height, significantly higher<br />
than saline water irrigation. <strong>Soil</strong> pH did not<br />
influence tree height significantly upto 9<br />
months after planting. Results recorded 12<br />
months after planting showed that the length<br />
of Prosopis alba was significantly influenced<br />
by irrigation schedules, water quality and soil<br />
pH. Average tree height at pH 7.5 and 8.5 was<br />
significantly higher than the average tree height<br />
at pH 9.6. Irrigations scheduled at IW/CPE 1.0<br />
recorded significantly superior plant height as<br />
compared with the IW/CPE 0.5 at all the soil<br />
pH levels. Irrigation with normal water resulted<br />
in significantly higher tree height at all the pH<br />
levels as compared to saline water irrigation.<br />
Interaction of soil pH, irrigation schedules and<br />
water quality was significant 12 months after<br />
planting of Prosopis alba.<br />
Upto six months from the planting, none of<br />
the treatments influenced height of Prosopis<br />
juliflora significantly. After nine months, tree<br />
height was significantly influenced by the water<br />
quality at soil pH 8.5 and 9.6. However, after 12<br />
months, tree height was significantly influenced<br />
by irrigation schedules, water quality and<br />
soil pH. Interaction effects of the three factors<br />
were significant. Frequent irrigation at all soil<br />
pH levels recorded significantly greater tree<br />
height as compared to irrigation at IW/CPE<br />
0.5. Irrigation with EC 5 dS m -1 water reduced<br />
tree height significantly at high pH levels as<br />
compared to normal pH level.<br />
Collar diameter of Prosopis alba and Prosopis<br />
juliflora<br />
Results showed that the collar diameter of<br />
Prosopis alba also remained unaffected by<br />
different factors upto first six months of planting.<br />
Significant effect of irrigation schedules and<br />
water quality on collar diameter was noticed<br />
only after 9 months. However, 12 months after<br />
planting, all the three factors significantly<br />
influenced collar diameter of Prosopis alba and<br />
their interaction were also significant. Average<br />
collar diameter in the soils with pH 9.6 was 2.70<br />
cm, significantly smaller than the average collar<br />
diameter in normal soils. Frequent irrigation<br />
gave significantly bigger collar diameter while<br />
irrigation with EC 5 dS m -1 water gave smaller<br />
collar diameter.<br />
Similarly, after 9 months from the planting,<br />
the collar diameter of Prosopis juliflora was<br />
significantly affected by water quality only and<br />
the other factors (irrigation and soil pH) did<br />
not influence the collar diameter significantly.<br />
Differences in the collar diameter of Prosopis<br />
juliflora were significant due to irrigation, water<br />
quality and soil pH at 12 months after planting.<br />
Total biomass of Prosopis alba and Prosopis<br />
juliflora<br />
The total biomass of Prosopis alba and Prosopis<br />
juliflora recorded after 12 months, was<br />
significantly influenced by irrigation schedules,<br />
water quality and soil pH and the interactions<br />
between various factors were significant.<br />
Prosopis alba in soil pH 9.6 gave the total biomass<br />
of 1469 g, which was significantly less than the<br />
biomass recorded in soil pH 7.5 conditions. In<br />
Prosopis juliflora average total biomass of 1558,<br />
1536 and 1504 g was observed in the soils with<br />
pH 7.5, 8.5 and 9.6, respectively. Frequent<br />
irrigation at IW/CPE 1.0 produced significantly<br />
higher biomass in both the tree species as<br />
compared to irrigation at IW/CPE 0.5 in all the<br />
soil pH conditions. Irrigation with normal water<br />
recorded significantly higher total biomass as<br />
compared to irrigation with saline waters.<br />
Height of Eucalyptus tereticornis, Acacia<br />
nilotica and Temarix articulata<br />
The results indicated that there was no<br />
significant difference in the height of Eucalyptus<br />
tereticornis, Acacia nilotica and Temarix articulata<br />
upto the first six months. After 12 months from<br />
the planting, the height of these trees were<br />
significantly influenced by irrigation schedules<br />
and water quality. However, interaction effect<br />
was observed only in the case of Eucalyptus<br />
tereticornis. Frequent irrigation at IW/CPE 2.0<br />
gave the highest tree height in all the species,<br />
significantly superior over IW/CPE 0.5.<br />
Irrigation with saline water of 5 dSm -1 recorded<br />
significantly lower tree height as compared to<br />
the irrigation with the normal water.<br />
76
<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
Agroforestry in salt affected soils<br />
Table 47 : Effect of irrigation schedules and water<br />
quality on the total biomass (g) of<br />
Eucalyptus teriticornis, Acacia nilotica<br />
and Temarix articulata<br />
IW/CPE<br />
Water<br />
quality<br />
Normal<br />
water<br />
Total Biomass (g)<br />
5 dSm -1 Mean<br />
Eucalyptus teriticornis<br />
0.5 2050 1870 1960<br />
1.0 2510 2100 2305<br />
2.0 3250 2890 3070<br />
Mean 2483 2346 2445<br />
No irrigation 1250<br />
CD 0.05<br />
Irrig. = 515; WQ = NS; Interaction = NS<br />
Acacia nilotica<br />
0.5 1569 1521 1545<br />
1.0 1789 1765 1777<br />
2.0 2156 2105 2130<br />
Mean 1821 1805 1817<br />
No irrigation <strong>11</strong>29<br />
CD 0.05<br />
Irrig. = 342; WQ = NS; Interaction = NS<br />
Temarix articulata<br />
0.5 1572 1489 1541<br />
1.0 1792 1752 1769<br />
2.0 2146 1989 2122<br />
Mean 1800 1782 1813<br />
No irrigation <strong>11</strong>02<br />
CD 0.05<br />
Irrig. = 321; WQ = NS; Interaction = NS<br />
After 12 months from the planting, total biomass<br />
of these trees was recorded and presented in<br />
Table 47. Results showed that only irrigation<br />
could give significant differences in total<br />
biomass of these tree species and no significant<br />
effect of water quality was recorded. Frequent<br />
irrigation at IW/CPE 2.0 recorded significantly<br />
higher total biomass over IW/CPE 0.5. There<br />
was no statistically significant difference in the<br />
total biomass under irrigation schedule IW/<br />
CPE 0.5 and 1.0.<br />
<strong>Soil</strong> organic carbon, NO 3<br />
-N and NH 4<br />
-N under<br />
different tree species<br />
After 12 months, the data on soil organic carbon,<br />
NO 3<br />
-N and NH 4<br />
-N was recorded in the soils<br />
growing various tree species. No systematic<br />
effect of irrigation and water quality treatments<br />
was observed on the soil organic carbon, NO 3<br />
-N<br />
and NH 4<br />
-N. This may be because of the fact<br />
that 12 months growth period is too short to get<br />
these effects.<br />
Different irrigation schedules and salinity<br />
treatments did not influence height and girth<br />
of the trees significantly in the first six months.<br />
However, impact was visible in some species<br />
only after six months.<br />
Tree-soil Interactions vis-à-vis <strong>Soil</strong> Fertility<br />
Improvement in Sodic and Reclaimed Sodic<br />
<strong>Soil</strong>s (C.B. Pandey, S.K. Chaudhari, J.C. Dagar)<br />
Seasonal dynamics of ECe, pH, Na, Ca, Mg,<br />
organic carbon, nitrate N, ammonium N and<br />
microbial biomass carbon (MB-c) were studied at<br />
different soil depths under Prosopis juliflora trees<br />
in sodic soil at the Saraswati forest. Treatment<br />
included the trees of 6 ages (0, 2, 3, 6, 10 and<br />
15 yrs), 2 canopy positions (near trunk and mid<br />
canopy) and 7 soil depths (0-15, 15-30, 30-45, 45-<br />
60, 60-75, 75-90, 90-105 cm). 0-yr age was treated<br />
as a control. Native soil was sodic with ECe 3.6<br />
± 0.30 dS m -1 and pH 10.4 ± 0.31.<br />
Chemical analysis of the soils revealed that<br />
with passage of age (0-15 yr), ECe, pH, Na and<br />
K declined (3.82 to 0.92 dS m -1 , 10.21 to 7.15,<br />
219 to 33 µg g -1 , 79.9 to 60.3 µg g -1 , respectively)<br />
in 0-15 cm and all other soil depths under the<br />
tree. The decline was found, however, up to 60<br />
cm depth. Values of the parameters at near the<br />
trunk did not differ with that at mid canopy<br />
position, hence average values are presented.<br />
Regression analysis of the data revealed that<br />
they followed the decay exponential model; this<br />
indicated that decline in these parameters in the<br />
beginning was slow up to 5 yrs and increased<br />
thereafter at a relatively rapid rate. Contrary to<br />
+<br />
the above parameters, Ca, Mg, SOC, NO 3-<br />
, NH 4<br />
and microbial biomass carbon (MB-c) increased<br />
(1.18 to 4.9 me L -1 , 0.05 to 1.05 me L -1 , 0.03 to<br />
0.48 %, 0.05 to 0.30 µg g -1 , 55.4 to 215 µg g -1 ,<br />
respectively) in 0-15 cm and other soil depths<br />
with increase in the age of the tree, the increase,<br />
however, was significant up to 60 cm depth.<br />
(Fig. 36). These parameters followed the<br />
exponential model of increase. These suggest<br />
that water soluble carbon probably penetrated<br />
to the depths, which together with SOC<br />
contributed by the root litter and root exudates<br />
lowered pH, ECe, Na and increased cations like<br />
77
Agroforestry in salt affected soils <strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
Ca and Mg. During the rainy season, ECe and<br />
pH were slightly lower than the winter and<br />
summer seasons in upper depths (up to 60 cm)<br />
of the soils. In deeper soil depths, no significant<br />
variation was observed. Similar observations<br />
were made in almost all the parameters. Nitrate<br />
N, ammonium N and MB-c were greater in the<br />
upper soil depths and declined with depth.<br />
Greater N transformations and MB-c under<br />
the older trees indicated that the soils became<br />
biologically active with passage of time under<br />
Prosopis juliflora trees.<br />
Fig. 36 : Changes in the parameters with age in different depths under Prosopis trees<br />
78
<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
RECLAMATION AND MANAGEMENT OF ALKALI SOILS OF<br />
CENTRAL AND EASTERN GANGATIC PLAINS<br />
Land Modification for Increasing Water<br />
Productivity by Different Farming Systems<br />
in Waterlogged Sodic <strong>Soil</strong>s along the Sharda<br />
Sahayak Canal Command of U.P. (D.K. Sharma,<br />
Y.P. Singh, V.K. Mishra, C.L. Verma and<br />
P.K. Varshney)<br />
A fish pond based integrated farming system<br />
model was developed over an area of 1 ha<br />
consisting of aqua culture, cereal crop<br />
production, vegetable, fruits and forage<br />
production system. A pond of 1.75 m depth was<br />
dug in 0.4 ha land. Initial soil pH was above 10 at<br />
surface and 8.8 below 1 m depth. Depth of water<br />
in the pond varied from 0.10 m to 1.25 m during<br />
December 2009 to November <strong>2010</strong> (Fig. 37). The<br />
maximum volume of stored water was 5440 m 3 .<br />
Canal closure from 23 April to 31 May, <strong>2010</strong> and<br />
31 October to 30 November, <strong>2010</strong>. During the<br />
year <strong>2010</strong>, pond dried first time due to more than<br />
one month of canal closure in summer season.<br />
The pH and EC of the pond water was in the safe<br />
range for fish production. Rice, wheat, sorghum<br />
(forage), mustard, garlic and onion were grown<br />
successfully on embankment and elevated field<br />
beds. Six thousand fingerlings of three species<br />
Fig. 37 : Water depth fluctuation in pond<br />
namely Rohu, Catla and Mrigal were stocked<br />
during the month of August <strong>2010</strong>. Maximum<br />
B:C of 4.82 was obtained for fish production<br />
system. Average B:C was 3.17 for the system as<br />
a whole (Table 48)<br />
Study on Salt and Water Dynamics and Crop<br />
Performance in Waterlogged Sodic <strong>Soil</strong>s Under<br />
Raised and Sunken Beds (Chhedi Lal Verma,<br />
Y.P. Singh and T. Damodaran)<br />
Traditional reclamation practices under shallow<br />
water table conditions do not last for a long<br />
time. Therefore, alternative to these practices<br />
deserves due attention. Excessive seepage from<br />
View of farming system model at Kashrawan, Raibareli<br />
79
Reclamation and management of alkali soils of central and eastern gangatic plains <strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
Table 48 : Benfit cost ratio for different farming<br />
systems<br />
Systems<br />
Cost of<br />
cultivation<br />
(`)<br />
Gross<br />
income<br />
(`)<br />
Net<br />
return<br />
(`)<br />
B:C<br />
Fish 8,500 40,970 32,470 4.82<br />
Cereals 6,540 <strong>11</strong>,240 4,700 1.71<br />
Vegetables 4,235 10,456 6,221 2.46<br />
Forage 1,480 3,218 1,738 2.17<br />
Total 20,755 65,884 45,129 3.17<br />
unlined canal is the reason for waterlogging.<br />
Salt accumulation due to continuous seepage<br />
in the deeper soil profile is less as compared to<br />
the soil surface. Consequently, the soil pH is<br />
higher at the surface and low towards deeper<br />
profiles. Raised and sunken bed system seemed<br />
to be an appropriate alternative for small and<br />
marginal farmers. Most profitable crops, crop<br />
rotations, water management practices need<br />
to be worked out before large scale adoption<br />
of such technology. A study on raised and<br />
sunken bed was taken up in Sharda Sahayak<br />
Canal Command in village Kashrawan, district<br />
Raebareli with the objective to bring waterlogged<br />
sodic soils under cultivation.<br />
<strong>Soil</strong> pH at severely affected land was 10.0 at<br />
surface and 8.40 below 1 m depth. Two raised<br />
beds of 60 m lengths were constructed during<br />
the month of June 2009. After formation of<br />
raised and sunken beds, the average pH 2<br />
of first<br />
raised bed was observed to be 9.4 and EC 2<br />
0.43<br />
dS m -1 and that of second raised bed average pH 2<br />
was 8.6 and EC 0.14 dS m-1 . Top width of raised<br />
beds was kept as 2.0 m and bottom width as 4 m.<br />
Bed width of sunken bed was 7.0 m. Boundary<br />
embankment width was also kept 2.0 m wide<br />
except for the boundary bunds towards south<br />
which was only one meter wide on the top.<br />
Total area under raised and sunken beds and<br />
boundary beds was 3560 m 2 . Out of this, raised<br />
beds are over an area of 1266 m 2 , sunken beds of<br />
2293 m 2 . Area under boundary beds is 786 m 2 .<br />
Saplings of vegetable crops were planted in<br />
ring basin on raised beds filled with parent soil<br />
and farm yard manure during the first week of<br />
August. Karemua/nali sag was also planted on<br />
the raised bed. Eighty banana saplings were<br />
planted in ring basin over raised bed on three<br />
sides of large sunken bed. Plantation was done<br />
only on the inner side for the ease to apply<br />
irrigation water from the sunken bed during<br />
dry period. Rice was transplanted in sunken bed<br />
during summer and kharif seasons. Yield data of<br />
vegetables and rice are presented in Table 49.<br />
Salt dynamics in raised beds<br />
Average variation of EC and pH in raised beds<br />
are presented in Table 50. First soil sampling up<br />
to 1.20 m depth was done after kharif 2009. EC of<br />
first raised bed during November 2009 ranged<br />
from 0.90 dS m -1 to 0.36 dS m -1 and during<br />
November <strong>2010</strong> from 0.39 to 92 dS m -1 and that<br />
of second raised bed ranged 0.33 to 0.49 dS m -1<br />
during November 2009 and 0.32 to 0.77 dS m -1<br />
during November <strong>2010</strong> (Table 50). Similarly, pH<br />
of first raised bed ranged from 8.1 to 9.3 during<br />
November 2009 and 8.6 to 9.3 during November<br />
<strong>2010</strong> in 0-15 cm to 90-120 cm soil depths. The<br />
pH of first raised bed reduced after one year<br />
as compared to second raised bed, raised bed<br />
where pH seems to have been marginally<br />
elevated. <strong>Soil</strong> conditions on both the raised beds<br />
is improving.<br />
View of raised and sunken bed model at Kashrawan<br />
80
<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
Reclamation and management of alkali soils of central and eastern gangatic plains<br />
Table 49 : Yield of vegetable and rice crops under raised and sunken bed system<br />
S.N.<br />
Rabi crops<br />
(2009-10)<br />
Yield<br />
(kg)<br />
Summer crops<br />
<strong>2010</strong><br />
Yield<br />
(kg)<br />
Kharif crops<br />
<strong>2010</strong><br />
Yield<br />
(kg)<br />
1. Sponge gourd 6.20 Sponge gourd 29.50 Sponge gourd 172.2<br />
2. Mustard 28.50 Bottle gourd 60.50 Pumpkin 25.40<br />
3. Peas 2.95 Bitter gourd 3.50 Bitter gourd 27.85<br />
4. Chilies 5.00 Snake gourd 4.50<br />
Karemua/<br />
Nalisag<br />
120.50<br />
5. Bitter gourd 6.00 Cucumber 2.70 Chilies <strong>11</strong>.95<br />
6. Papaya 2.50 Cabbage 4.50 Chaulai 16.50<br />
7. Bottle gourd 22.30 Cauliflower 39.00 Bottle gourd 157.50<br />
8. Okra 1.00 Tomato 223.30 Brinjal 19.55<br />
9. Brinjal 12.40 Garlic 8.00 Okra 18.50<br />
10. Radish 140.50 Mustard, Sag 25.00 Cucumber 7.40<br />
<strong>11</strong>. Dill 34.10 Brinjal 65.30 Water melon 13.00<br />
12. Methi 10.40 Chaulai 9.50 Spinach 4.00<br />
13. Spinach 59.30 Capsicum 5.60 Radish 6.00<br />
14. Coriander 15.10 Chili 2.45 Finger millet 1.20<br />
15. Cabbage 29.80 Coriander 3.75<br />
16. Paprika 1.60 Onion <strong>11</strong>.50<br />
17. Onion 1.60 Karemua/Nali sag 16.90<br />
18. Water melon 12.30<br />
19. Okra 2.50<br />
20. Cow pea 3.40<br />
21. Cluster bean 2.30<br />
22 Rice (t ha -1 ) 3.00 Rice (t ha -1 ) 2.20<br />
Table 50 : Variation of EC and pH in raised beds at different depth<br />
<strong>Soil</strong><br />
Depth<br />
(cm)<br />
Av. EC<br />
(dSm -1 )<br />
Raised bed - 1 Raised bed - 2<br />
Nov. 2009 Nov. <strong>2010</strong> Nov. 2009 Nov. <strong>2010</strong><br />
Av. pH<br />
Av. EC<br />
(dSm -1 )<br />
Av. pH<br />
Av. EC<br />
(dSm -1 )<br />
Av. pH<br />
Av. EC<br />
(dSm -1 )<br />
Av. pH<br />
0-15 0.90 9.26 0.92 8.10 0.49 8.14 0.77 8.79<br />
15-30 0.80 9.34 0.92 8.92 0.37 8.13 0.50 8.80<br />
30-45 0.68 9.44 0.57 9.20 0.33 8.39 0.36 8.71<br />
45-60 0.64 9.14 0.48 9.27 0.36 8.57 0.32 8.58<br />
60-90 0.50 8.91 0.39 9.<strong>11</strong> 0.38 8.68 0.50 9.05<br />
90-120 0.36 8.66 0.53 8.41 0.53 9.34 0.69 9.28<br />
Resource Conservation for Rice and Wheat<br />
System through Intervention of Tillage<br />
and Crop Residue Management in Partially<br />
Reclaimed Indo-Gangatic Sodic <strong>Soil</strong> (V.K.<br />
Mishra, A.K. Nayak, Y.P. Singh, D.K. Sharma<br />
and Ranbir Singh)<br />
Experiment initiated in 2005 was continued with<br />
six tillage levels with and without residue as<br />
reported in previous annual report. During fifth<br />
year, the grain yield of 2.8 t ha -1 of wheat was<br />
recorded in conventional tillage and 3.2 t ha -1 in<br />
direct seeded rice + sesbania followed by zero<br />
tillage (Table 51). Under zero tillage, the yield<br />
was 3.1 t ha -1 . The combined effect of crop residue<br />
and tillage method further increased the wheat<br />
yield in comparison to the individual effect of<br />
crop residue and tillage. The yield component<br />
like plant height, number of tillers, spike length<br />
and test weight considerably increased in crop<br />
residue applied plots.<br />
Maximum rice grain yield (4.50 t ha -1 ) was<br />
recorded under direct seeded (Table 52) and it<br />
81
Reclamation and management of alkali soils of central and eastern gangatic plains <strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
Table 51 : Effect of tillage and crop residue on grain<br />
yield of wheat<br />
Tillage<br />
Without<br />
crop<br />
residue<br />
Grain yield (t ha -1 )<br />
With<br />
crop<br />
residue<br />
Mean<br />
Conventional 2.80 3.20 3.00<br />
Zero till – zero<br />
till<br />
Direct Seeded -<br />
zero till<br />
Direct seeded +<br />
sesbenia- zero<br />
till<br />
Puddling- zero<br />
till<br />
Dry ploughing<br />
- zero till<br />
3.10 3.30 3.20<br />
2.80 3.00 2.90<br />
3.20 3.50 3.35<br />
2.60 3.00 2.80<br />
3.00 3.20 3.10<br />
Mean 2.92 3.20 3.06<br />
Table 52 : Effect of tillage and crop residue on grain<br />
yield of rice<br />
Tillage<br />
Without<br />
crop<br />
residue<br />
Grain yield (t ha -1 )<br />
With<br />
crop<br />
residue<br />
Mean<br />
Conventional 4.30 4.40 4.35<br />
Zero till – zero<br />
till<br />
Direct seeded –<br />
zero till<br />
Direct seeded +<br />
sesbenia- zero till<br />
Puddling- zero<br />
till<br />
Dry ploughing -<br />
zero till<br />
4.20 4.30 4.25<br />
4.50 4.70 4.60<br />
3.40 3.60 3.50<br />
4.30 4.50 4.40<br />
4.40 4.40 4.40<br />
Mean 4.18 4.32 4.25<br />
Performance of rice under direct seeded and transplanted<br />
conditions<br />
Table 53 : Effect of tillage and crop residue on soil<br />
aggregates<br />
Treatments<br />
Micro<br />
(
<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
Reclamation and management of alkali soils of central and eastern gangatic plains<br />
tillage in wheat also showed significant increase<br />
in sequestration potential. The integration of<br />
zero tillage with crop residue further enhanced<br />
the sequestration rate in partial reclaimed sodic<br />
soil.<br />
Stress Tolerant Rice for Poor Farmers in Africa<br />
and South Asia (BMGF Project)–Farmers<br />
Participatory Varietals Selection Trial of Salt<br />
Tolerant Varieties (V.K. Mishra, D.K. Sharma,<br />
Y.P. Singh and S.K. Sharma)<br />
Mother trials<br />
Under the BILL & MILLINDA project funded by<br />
IRRI, one mother trial consisting of 12 varieties<br />
/genotypes viz;CSR 10, CSR 30, CSR 36, CSR-<br />
89IR-8, CSR-89IR-14, CSR-89IR-15, CSR- 2K 219,<br />
CSR 2K 242, CSR 2K 255, CSR 2K 262, N 359<br />
and Local was conducted during kharif <strong>2010</strong> at<br />
Lucknow. The soil pH was 9.5-9.6. Maximum<br />
yield 5.85 t ha -1 in CSR-2K 219 was recorded<br />
(Table 54) under sodic soil (pH 9.5-9.6) followed<br />
by CSR89 IR 8 (5.82 t ha -1 ), CSR 2K 262 (5.37 t<br />
ha -1 ), CSR 36 (5.27 t ha -1 ), CSR-89IR-14 (5.26 t<br />
ha -1 ) and lowest in Gangakaveri (3.67 t ha -1 ).<br />
Baby trials<br />
To scale out salt tolerant varieties selected from<br />
mother trials conducted during 2009, baby<br />
trials with two salt tolerant viz., CSR 36 & CSR<br />
89 IR-8 and one traditional variety/genotype<br />
were conducted on farmer’s field at 30 sites in<br />
six villages of Unnao and Lucknow districts.<br />
The soil pH ranged from 9.5-10.3. Yield data<br />
Table 54 : Yield of rice varieties in mother trial at<br />
Shivri farm<br />
Varieties Grain yield (t ha -1 )<br />
CSR-10 4.35<br />
CSR-30 2.35<br />
CSR-36 5.27<br />
CSR-89IR 8 5.82<br />
CSR-89IR14 5.26<br />
CSR-89IR15 4.24<br />
CSR-2K 219 5.85<br />
CSR-2K 242 4.37<br />
CSR-2K 255 4.57<br />
CSR-2K 262 5.37<br />
NDR-359 4.47<br />
Gangakaveri (Local HYV) 3.67<br />
Mean 4.63<br />
Fig. 39: Rice yield on farmers’ fields at different pH levels<br />
indicated that the variety CSR 36 gave the<br />
overall average maximum yield of 4.05 t ha -1<br />
followed by CSR 89IR- 8 (3.06 t ha -1 ) . Further,<br />
it is shown in the Fig. 39 that salt tolerant and<br />
local varieties performed equally good upto 9.3<br />
pH. At higher pH (9.3), the yield was drastically<br />
reduced under traditional variety (1.98 t ha -1 ),<br />
whereas salt tolerant variety CSR 36 performed<br />
better and 4.05 and 3.98 t ha -1 yield was recorded<br />
in Lucknow and Unnao districts, respectively.<br />
Impact Assessment of Climate Change on Crop<br />
Production under Salt Affected Environment<br />
of Uttar Pradesh (V.K. Mishra, Y.P. Singh, D.K.<br />
Sharma and T. Damodaran)<br />
Available weather data of past 30 years of three<br />
different stations viz; Lucknow, Kanpur and<br />
Faizabad of salt affected areas were collected<br />
from Indian Institute of Sugarcane <strong>Research</strong><br />
(Lucknow), C.S. Azad University of Agriculture<br />
and Technology (Kanpur) and N.D. University<br />
of Agriculture and Technology (Kumarganj,<br />
Faizabad). Temperature trend for 3 districts of<br />
U.P. were studied for wheat growing period i.e.<br />
from Nov-March. The maximum and minimum<br />
temperature during Nov-March has increased<br />
0.3 and 0.1 o C, respectively. Temperature of<br />
March has increased 0.47 o C for maximum and<br />
0.50 o C for minimum. As March is a crucial<br />
month for wheat production and < 3 mm rain<br />
was recorded for the study period, it is correlated<br />
with wheat yield for Lucknow station (Fig 40).<br />
The response curve was tested using heat<br />
capacity model for the yield of wheat in relation<br />
to temperature pattern (y=a+bx+cx 2 ; where,<br />
83
Reclamation and management of alkali soils of central and eastern gangatic plains <strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
Table 55 : Effect of date of sowing and zero tillage<br />
on grain yield (t ha -1 ) of wheat<br />
Date of<br />
sowing<br />
Normal soil<br />
Zero Conv.<br />
tillage<br />
Sodic soil<br />
Zero Conv.<br />
tillage<br />
12 Nov, 2009 4.5 - 3.2 -<br />
15 Nov, 2009 4.4 - 3.2 -<br />
20 Nov, 2009 3.5 3.6 2.9 2.8<br />
25 Nov, 2009 3.0 3.4 1.9 2.0<br />
05 Dec, 2009 2.3 2.8 1.6 1.8<br />
Fig. 40: Heat capacity model of temperature Vs wheat<br />
yield<br />
a=2.4968034, b=18<strong>11</strong>258 and c=-0.3880648).<br />
Analysis showed that wheat yield would<br />
decreased by about 8 per cent with 1 o C rise in<br />
temperature over the average temperature of<br />
March (23.3 o C).<br />
14 Dec, 2009 2.0 2.0 1.3 1.6<br />
20 Dec, 2009 2.0 1.8 0.9 0.7<br />
Conv. - Conventional<br />
Mitigation strategy for terminal heat effects on<br />
wheat<br />
Farmers’ participatory field trials were<br />
conducted on normal and sodic soil conditions<br />
in Raebareli and Barabanki districts to evaluate<br />
the mitigation strategies viz., advancing the<br />
planting time of wheat, use of salt tolerant<br />
cultivars and application of crop residue.<br />
In central part of U.P., wheat is sown around 25<br />
November to 15 December because of the late<br />
vacation of rice fields. To avoid the late planting<br />
of wheat, zero tillage technique was adopted.<br />
The results indicated that advancing the sowing<br />
date to 12 and 15 November considerably<br />
improved the wheat yield under both the soil<br />
conditions over late sowing by zero tillage and<br />
conventional method (Table 55).<br />
Use of crop residue and salt tolerant cultivars<br />
At five places in the same districts, rice residue<br />
(25% of total production) was applied just<br />
after wheat sowing. The crop residue helped<br />
in maintaining the soil moisture and thermal<br />
regime and saved about one irrigation.<br />
The application of crop residue produced more<br />
than 12 per cent higher yield in comparison<br />
Fig. 41: Effect of crop residue application on wheat yield<br />
production<br />
to unmulched plots in sodic and normal soils<br />
(Fig. 41). Also, use of salt tolerant varieties of<br />
wheat on sodic soils gave 29.41 per cent higher<br />
yield over normal varieties.<br />
International Rice Salt Stress Tolerance<br />
Observational Nursery (V.K. Mishra, D.K.<br />
Sharma and Y.P. Singh)<br />
To enhance the productivity of salt affected<br />
soil, a IRSSTON trial consisting of 30 genotypes<br />
(including 6 checks with two sensitive and 4<br />
tolerant) was conducted in sodic soil (pH 9.8-<br />
10.2) at <strong>CSSRI</strong>, Regional <strong>Research</strong> Station,<br />
Lucknow during kharif <strong>2010</strong>. Under sodic soil<br />
(pH 9.8-10.0), maximum yield of 3.41 t ha -1 was<br />
recorded in BMZ 8 followed by CSR 36 (2.72<br />
t ha -1 ), CSR 10 (2.52 t ha -1 ), BMZ 1 (2.36 t ha -1 ),<br />
BMZ 24 (1.56 t ha -1 ), CSR 23 (2.<strong>11</strong> t ha -1 ), BMZ<br />
4 (1.50 t ha -1 ) and lowest in BMZ 7 and BMZ 12<br />
(0.056 t ha -1 ).<br />
84
<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
Reclamation and management of alkali soils of central and eastern gangatic plains<br />
Performance of BMZ 8 lines in sodic soil ( pH 9.8-10.2)<br />
Nitrogen Response on Selected AVT-2 of<br />
Rice Cultivars under High and Low Input<br />
Management (V.K. Mishra, D.K. Sharma and<br />
Y.P. Singh)<br />
In AVT-2 trials, total nine entries were evaluated<br />
with three nitrogen levels i.e. 50, 100 and 150%<br />
of recommended dose. The soil was moderately<br />
sodic in nature (pH 8.9). The experiment was<br />
conducted with three replications in spilt plot<br />
design (plot size 5.6 m 2 ). The data indicated<br />
that increasing dose of nitrogen increased the<br />
rice yield in all cultivars (Table 56). Among the<br />
cultivars, the maximum yield of 6.59 t ha -1 was<br />
recorded from Gangakaveri and minimum (4.57<br />
t ha -1 ) from IET20329 under 150 per cent dose<br />
of N.<br />
Table 56 : Response of rice genotypes to nitrogen<br />
application in moderate sodic soil<br />
Genotypes<br />
50 %<br />
N<br />
Grain yield (t ha -1 )<br />
100 %<br />
N<br />
150 %<br />
N<br />
Mean<br />
IET 20328 4.58 4.73 5.<strong>11</strong> 4.81<br />
IET 20329 4.30 4.23 4.57 4.36<br />
IET 20330 4.10 4.23 4.78 4.37<br />
IET 21640 4.40 4.84 5.74 4.99<br />
IET 21641 4.81 5.53 5.70 5.35<br />
CSR 23 4.98 5.42 5.85 5.42<br />
CSR 36 5.47 5.87 6.20 5.84<br />
Jaya 4.52 4.60 5.02 4.71<br />
Gangakaveri 3.37 5.22 6.59 5.06<br />
Mean 4.50 4.96 5.51 4.99<br />
Identification of Genotypes in Cactus, Banana,<br />
Guava and Aonla for Tolerance to Sodicity<br />
and Standardization of Management Practices<br />
for Economic Livelihood in the Resource Poor<br />
Sodic Lands (T. Damodaran, V.K. Mishra, D.K.<br />
Sharma and C.L. Verma)<br />
Development of management practices under<br />
sodic soils for banana<br />
Performance of banana is being evaluated under<br />
sub-soil sodicity at Shivri farm. The treatments<br />
comprising T 1<br />
-50% Phosopogypsum; T 2<br />
- 50%<br />
Gypsum; T 3<br />
- 25% Phosopogypsum; T 4<br />
-25%<br />
Gypsum; T 5<br />
- 25% Phospogypsum + Mulch<br />
+ Psuedomonas; T 6<br />
= 25% Gypsum + Mulch +<br />
Psuedomonas; T 7<br />
=25% Phosphogypsum + Mulch<br />
+ Vermi compost; T 8<br />
=25% Gypsum + Mulch+<br />
Vermi compost; T 9<br />
=25% Phosphogypsum<br />
+ Mulch + Vermi compost+ Psuedomonas;<br />
T 10<br />
=25% Gypsum + Mulch+ Vermi compost+<br />
Psuedomonas; T <strong>11</strong><br />
=Control were imposed in<br />
banana suckers. The variety Pisang Awak was<br />
planted in pits of 60x60x60 cm size at a spacing<br />
of 2m x 2m. It was found that during the time of<br />
shooting, the pH of the soils in the treatments<br />
with 25% phospogypsum in combinations<br />
with vermicompost, mulch and Psuedomonas<br />
(native strains isolated from sodic soils of pH<br />
9.6) reduced from 9.14 to 8.74 (Fig. 42) which<br />
resulted in higher bunch weight (Table 57) of 16<br />
kg bunch -1 while in control the yield was 2.25 kg<br />
bunch -1 . The biochemical analysis of enzymes<br />
(Table 58) like peroxidase, polyphenol oxidase,<br />
phenyl alanine lyase and biochemicals like<br />
phenol and proline indicated positive correlation<br />
with the sodicity tolerance which elaborates the<br />
role of these defense enzymes.<br />
Fig. 42 : Changes in pH before planting and at<br />
shooting<br />
85
Reclamation and management of alkali soils of central and eastern gangatic plains <strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
Table 57 : Phenological characters of banana variety Pisang Awak<br />
Treatments<br />
Plant height<br />
(cm)<br />
Plant girth<br />
(cm)<br />
No. of<br />
leaves<br />
No. of<br />
suckers<br />
Bunch wt.<br />
(kg)<br />
T 1<br />
334.5 55.5 10.0 5.0 10.0 21.5<br />
T 2<br />
335.0 52.5 <strong>11</strong>.5 5.0 9.0 21.5<br />
T 3<br />
307.0 58.0 12.5 10.5 7.0 18.0<br />
T 4<br />
288.0 52.0 <strong>11</strong>.5 4.5 6.4 20.2<br />
T 5<br />
289.5 57.0 10.0 5.5 7.9 18.5<br />
T 6<br />
294.0 49.0 10.5 3.0 7.0 21.2<br />
T 7<br />
312.0 51.5 12.5 5.0 8.5 23.5<br />
T 8<br />
267.0 48.5 10.0 6.0 7.5 22.4<br />
T 9<br />
368.0 62.5 12.0 7.0 16.0 22.5<br />
T 10<br />
362.0 56.5 12.5 7.5 12.0 24.1<br />
T <strong>11</strong><br />
229.5 29.0 9.0 0.0 2.25 16.8<br />
CD (5%) 9.53 5.10 1.42 3.60 1.40 5.52<br />
SEd 4.57 2.45 0.68 1.73 0.67 2.72<br />
Table 58 : Changes in enzymes and biochemical contents at shooting<br />
Treatment<br />
PO<br />
(abs min -1 g -1 )<br />
PPO<br />
(abs min -1 g -1 ))<br />
PAL<br />
(nmol min -1 ml -1 )<br />
Proline<br />
(mg g -1 )<br />
TSS<br />
(%)<br />
Phenols<br />
(mg g -1 )<br />
T 1<br />
6.06 3.08 15.13 466.00 241.25<br />
T 2<br />
6.31 0.53 16.08 475.10 218.50<br />
T 3<br />
18.3 4.13 23.01 342.00 326.50<br />
T 4<br />
10.74 0.23 25.10 351.00 346.25<br />
T 5<br />
14.52 3.75 39.22 471.00 582.00<br />
T 6<br />
14.40 3.79 33.31 458.00 621.50<br />
T 7<br />
10.74 8.42 30.22 372.00 342.00<br />
T 8<br />
9.71 7.66 30.65 384.00 351.50<br />
T 9<br />
15.79 0.69 27.12 608.50 624.00<br />
T 10<br />
13.58 0.79 30.22 596.00 620.00<br />
T <strong>11</strong><br />
14.15 2.64 13.85 167.00 300.50<br />
CD (5%) 1.19 1.39 1.71 13.89 12.60<br />
SEd 0.57 0.67 0.84 6.83 6.28<br />
PO- Peroxidase; PPO- Polyphenol oxidase; PAL- Phenyl alanine lyase<br />
A view of banana experiment<br />
Banana bunch with 25% Phosphogypsum + Mulch +<br />
Vermicompost +Psuedomonas<br />
86
<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
Reclamation and management of alkali soils of central and eastern gangatic plains<br />
Cultivation of banana with 25% phosphogypsum<br />
along with vermicompost, mulch and CSR-1<br />
strain of Psuedomonas is a technology which<br />
could generate economic livelihood for resource<br />
poor farmers and also serve as a tool in sub-soil<br />
sodicity management<br />
Screening of banana, cactus and aonla for<br />
sodicity tolerance<br />
Four varieties of banana were screened for<br />
their performance under sodic soil (pH 2<br />
9.0–<br />
9.50 at 0-15 cm depth). It was found that the<br />
varieties Udayan and Karpooravalli exhibited<br />
higher yield (20.0 kg) than others (Table 59).<br />
Six accessions were selected in the aonla based<br />
on their yield and were evaluated for further<br />
selection. It was observed that the ACC.No.<br />
1 and ACC No.2 in five years old plantation<br />
showed higher yield of about 19.60 kg and<br />
18.50 kg, respectively. Four varieties of guava<br />
(Shweta, Lalit, Sardar and Allahabad Safeda)<br />
were screened under three different planting<br />
systems of 3.0 x 3.0 m, 3.0 x 1.5m and 2 x 1.5m.<br />
The trees under the spacing of 2 x 1.5m gave<br />
the highest yield (3.0 kg tree -1 ) with the variety<br />
Shewta. Technology for successful cultivation<br />
of vegetables as intercrops in guava orchards on<br />
the paddy straw with minimum soil medium of<br />
pH > 9.3 was developed. It consisted of a thick<br />
layer of 10 cm paddy straw spread over the soil<br />
and tied with ropes from the bottom so that they<br />
form a cavity where about 5 cm of reclaimed<br />
soil was spread, where vegetables were grown.<br />
Vegetables like bottle gourd and bitter gourd<br />
Table 59 : Performance of the banana varieties in<br />
sodic soils (pH-9.3 below 15 cm depth)<br />
Varieties<br />
Plant<br />
height<br />
(cm)<br />
Plant<br />
girth<br />
(cm)<br />
No. of<br />
leaves<br />
No. of<br />
suckers<br />
Yield<br />
(kg<br />
pl -1 )<br />
during summer while tomato and cabbage<br />
during rabi seasons were cultivated successfully<br />
on bed size of 4.0 x 0.4 x 0.3 m. An additional<br />
income ranging from ` 100-200 bed -1 could be<br />
obtained from the intercrops.<br />
Holistic Approach for Improving Livelihood<br />
Security through Livestock Based Farming<br />
System in Barabanki and Raebareli districts<br />
of U.P. (T. Damodaran, V.K. Mishra, D.K.<br />
Sharma)<br />
A NAIP-3 sub-project is being implemented<br />
in Barabanki and Raebareli districts of Uttar<br />
Pradesh. Two clusters in each district were<br />
chosen for the project with main focus on<br />
landless and small land holders. The following<br />
are the technologies were implemented.<br />
Commercial cultivation of banana using<br />
precision farming technology<br />
About 30 farmers adopted the technology<br />
where banana cultivation is being coupled with<br />
crops like moong bean and black gram during<br />
summer followed by early tomato, cabbage<br />
and cauliflower in monsoon. The technology<br />
was further strengthened with on farm vermin<br />
composting, mass multiplication of Psuedomonas<br />
and Trichoderma. The technology of rural poultry<br />
was also integrated for providing sustainable<br />
livelihood. The average income of the farmers<br />
who had adopted banana cultivation with<br />
composting is about ` 1,30,000 from an area of<br />
0.2 ha (Fig 43).<br />
G9 100 37 7 5.0 5.50<br />
Udayan 380 68 12 6.0 20.0<br />
Ney<br />
poovan<br />
Karpooravalli<br />
250 47 8 5.0 8.0<br />
334.5 55.5 10.0 5.0 12.0<br />
Banana cultivation at farmers’ field<br />
87
Reclamation and management of alkali soils of central and eastern gangatic plains <strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
Fig. 43 : Pre and post interventions income of the<br />
farmers in different enterprises<br />
Integration of technologies for sustainable<br />
livelihood under marginal lands and sodic<br />
soils<br />
An integrated approach was implemented<br />
for the marginal and landless farmers. Initial<br />
livelihood support was provided with backyard<br />
poultry, goat farming and therapeautic measures<br />
to increase the milk yield. An initial income<br />
of ` 14,000 was obtained. The average income<br />
obtained from vegetable as intercrop and<br />
pure crop was ` 22, 000. Later, they adopted<br />
commercial poultry with an income of ` 14,000<br />
within 90 days. Thus, the average total annual<br />
income of the beneficiary at the end of the first<br />
year including the cultivation of wheat on leased<br />
land of 1500 m 2 through zero tillage technology<br />
was ` 86,200. Advance sowing of wheat with<br />
Sowing of wheat by zero tillage<br />
zero tillage machine also helped to minimize the<br />
terminal heat effect during the month of March.<br />
An average employment of 155 man days was<br />
generated in a year. Apart from this, the family<br />
labour, which used to work at Lucknow started<br />
staying in the village itself to take up the venture<br />
as a family business. There was reduction in the<br />
expenditure to about ` 500 month -1 year -1 for<br />
per person<br />
Exploitation of microbial biodynamism in<br />
sodic soils<br />
One strain of Trichoderma viridae, Aspergillus niger,<br />
Aspergillus fumigatus was isolated from the soils<br />
of pH 9.7 and three strains of Psuedomonas. These<br />
strains were tested for the inability to multiply in<br />
sodic soils of pH ranging from 9.0 to 10.0. They<br />
are also being assessed for their bio-control and<br />
growth promotion activities under sodic soils.<br />
Strains of Psuedomonas isolated from soils of pH 9.7<br />
Trichoderma viridae under culture and microscopic view<br />
ACC.No.2 of aonla<br />
Bunch of Udayan variety of banana<br />
High density guava intercropped with<br />
vegetables on paddy straw<br />
88
<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
RECLAMATION AND MANAGEMENT OF SALT AFFECTED<br />
VERTISOLS<br />
Integrated Farming System Approach for<br />
Optimising Production from Saline Black<br />
<strong>Soil</strong>s (G. Gururaja Rao, M.K. Khandelwal, Anil<br />
R. Chinchmalatpure and Sanjay Arora)<br />
Saline Vertisols, which account for 0.1214 m ha in<br />
Gujarat State, due to their inherent physical and<br />
chemical constraints, hamper crop growth and<br />
productivity even at low salinities. The soils of<br />
Bara tract region comprising Amod, Vagra and<br />
Jambusar tehsils of Bharuch district have subsurface<br />
salinity, sodicity and accumulation of<br />
calcium carbonate. This region with a vast area<br />
of Vertisols has soil and ground water salinity<br />
as the major constraints in crop production.<br />
Farming system with in-situ water conservation,<br />
storage, recycling and utilisation of ground water<br />
for supplemental irrigation is an ideal strategy<br />
for enhancing crop/water productivity in saline<br />
Vertisols. Studies to evolve a farming system<br />
model for resource-poor farmers of this region<br />
giving emphasis to rain water conservation,<br />
enhancing water productivity through crop<br />
interventions (fruit trees, vegetables, biomass<br />
species, seed spices) have been conducted.<br />
The components of the system comprise a<br />
rain water harvesting structure (farm pond),<br />
fruit, vegetable, biomass species and field<br />
crops (spices) covering an area of 1.12 ha. The<br />
economic produce of vegetables and seed<br />
spices were harvested and water productivity<br />
(kg m -3 and ` m -3 ) and B:C ratio was calculated.<br />
Data indicated that spices had higher water<br />
productivity (in terms of monetary gains) as<br />
compared to vegetables (Table 60). Vegetables,<br />
however, had higher water productivity when<br />
yield is taken into account. The observations<br />
recorded during 2009 and <strong>2010</strong> by and large<br />
had the same trend. The low water requiring<br />
crops like dill, coriander along with vegetables<br />
because of their higher water productivity and<br />
B:C ratio are found ideal for the saline Vertisols<br />
of Bara tract (Table 61). Further studies on<br />
nutrients budgeting are in progress.<br />
Low water requiring crops like dill, ajwain<br />
along with vegetables because of their higher<br />
water productivitiy and B:C ratio are ideal for<br />
the water-scare saline Vertisols of Baratract.<br />
Table 60 : Performance of crop components under integrated farming system study<br />
Particulars Ajwan Dill Tomato Brinjal<br />
Area ( m 2 ) 480 1200 160 120 200<br />
Water applied (mm) 44 100 <strong>11</strong>0 200 134<br />
Yield (kg plot -1 ) 40 106 240 280 440<br />
Water productivity (kg m -3 ) 0.91 1.06 2.18 2.33 3.28<br />
Water productivity (` m -3 ) 72.7 31.8 12.2 18.7 17.6<br />
Cost of cultivation (`) 620 740 280 500 560<br />
Gross income (`) 3200 3180 1440 2240 3520<br />
Net income (`) 2580 2440 <strong>11</strong>60 1740 2960<br />
B:C 4.16 4.33 4.14 3.48 5.28<br />
Bottle<br />
gourd<br />
Table 61 : Water Productivity and B:C ratio of farming system components<br />
Parameter<br />
Spices<br />
Vegetables<br />
2009 <strong>2010</strong> 2009 <strong>2010</strong><br />
Water productivity (kg m -3 ) 0.984 0.985 2.40 2.59<br />
Water productivity ( ` m -3 ) 26.56 52.25* 13.03 16.16<br />
B : C 3.05 4.24 3.56 4.23<br />
89
Reclamation and management of salt affected vertisols <strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
Study on Effect of Sardar Sarovar Canal<br />
Command on Properties of Vertisols, Cropping<br />
Pattern and Socio-economic Status of Farmers<br />
of the Bara Tract Area of Gujarat State (Anil<br />
R. Chinchmalatpure, Sanjay Arora, S.K. Singh,<br />
R.K. Singh and H.S. Jat)<br />
Bara tract comprising of Amod, Jambusar and<br />
Vagra talukas of Bharuch district are affected<br />
by sub-surface salinity to a large extent. Bara<br />
tract comes under the Sardar Sarovar Canal<br />
Command area of Gujarat State and the farmers<br />
have started irrigated agriculture and majority<br />
of the fields near canal distributaries are under<br />
irrigation for rabi crops. Some farmers are also<br />
using tube well water as such and in cyclic<br />
mode with canal water for irrigation. During<br />
the reported period, soil survey was conducted<br />
in Vagra taluka of Bharuch district and soil<br />
sampling was done from the fields of farmers<br />
who are practicing irrigated agriculture using<br />
tube well as well as canal water for different<br />
crops like cotton, wheat, pigeon pea, sorghum<br />
etc. <strong>Soil</strong> sampling was taken to a depth of 90 cm<br />
with an interval of 30 cm i.e 0-30, 30-60 and 60-<br />
90 cm depth. Results of analysis showed that<br />
pH 2<br />
value ranged from 7.9 to 9.2 with mean of<br />
8.6, EC e<br />
value ranged from 0.58 to 8.0 dS m -1<br />
and showed increasing trend with depth. The<br />
bulk density ranged from 1.32 to 1.84 Mg m -3<br />
with mean of 1.46 Mg m -3 . <strong>Soil</strong>s of Jambusar<br />
taluka were analyzed for saturated hydraulic<br />
conductivity (HC) and values ranged from 0.01<br />
to 0.46 cm hr -1 . The high CEC and high base<br />
saturation percentage indicate the potential<br />
of these soils in terms of fertility. Saturation<br />
extracts of the soils were analysed for their<br />
Table 62 : Water balance at Samni farm, Bharuch (monsoon <strong>2010</strong>)<br />
Month<br />
Rainfall<br />
(mm)<br />
E R ROG RO CN<br />
88<br />
electrical conductivity, soluble cations and<br />
anions and the sodium adsorption ratio (SAR)<br />
was calculated. SAR ranged from 0.82 to 16.7<br />
with lowering of hydraulic conductivity as<br />
the correlation coefficient showed a significant<br />
negative correlation between HC and ESP<br />
(r =-0.57 at 1% level) and HC and SAR (r =-0.61<br />
at 1% level).<br />
Design, Development and Management of<br />
Surface Drainage System for Crop Production<br />
at Samni Farm (M.K. Khandelwal, A.R.<br />
Chinchmalatpure and S.K. Kamra)<br />
In order to effectively utilize the surface runoff<br />
generated in the farm during monsoon, surface<br />
drains were excavated and connected to the<br />
water harvesting structures. Nearly 2 km<br />
long (base width 0.60 m, depth 0.45 to 0.75 m)<br />
surface drains helped in reducing overall water<br />
stagnation period during rainy season of 2008-<br />
10. Rain water storage (volume and duration)<br />
increased for similar amount of rain 1063 mm<br />
in 2008 and 1053 mm in <strong>2010</strong> in all three tanks.<br />
Although estimated runoff decreased from<br />
473 mm in 2008 to 382 mm in <strong>2010</strong>, the surplus<br />
increased from 375 mm (2008) to 406 mm (<strong>2010</strong>),<br />
which also added to runoff collection. Rainfall<br />
analysis for Samni farm for <strong>2010</strong> indicated<br />
surplus rainfall in August (Table 62). Assuming<br />
that rainfall, runoff remained within the farm/<br />
catchment (say 20 ha) and no significant runoff<br />
entered from outside, a rise of 1.8 m (15.10 to<br />
13.80 m) and 2.45 m (from14.65 to 12.10 m) was<br />
observed at 2 piezometers installed in the study<br />
area during June 29-Oct. 29, <strong>2010</strong><br />
PET<br />
TW<br />
AET<br />
TW<br />
SUR PET PM EPAN<br />
June 66.0 59.0 22.7 20.0 218.0 66.0 - 177.9 108.0<br />
July 278.8 152.9 63.6 56.3 198.0 198.0 - <strong>11</strong>9.4 76.8<br />
Aug 496.8 174.7 244.2 225.2 167.0 167.0 406.0 98.0 50.4<br />
Sept 2<strong>11</strong>.3 139.9 92.8 80.7 178.0 178.0 - 97.5 33.6<br />
Total 1052.9 526.5 423.3 382.6 761.0 609.0 406.0 492.8 269.0<br />
ER- Effective rainfall; ROG- Run off under growing condition; RO CN- Run off curve No. 88; PET TW- Potenial<br />
evapotranspiration thornthwaite method; AETTW- Actual evapotranspiration thornthwaite method; SUR- Surplus<br />
rainfall; PET PM- Potential evapotranspiration penman monteith method; EPAN- Pan evaporation;<br />
90
<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
Reclamation and management of salt affected vertisols<br />
Bio-remediation of Coastal and Inland Salt<br />
Affected <strong>Soil</strong>s using Halophytic Plants and<br />
Halophilic <strong>Soil</strong> Microbes (Sanjay Arora, Ratna<br />
Trivedi, Anil R. Chinchmalatpure, G.G. Rao)<br />
Extensive survey was done in the coastal and<br />
inland salt affected lands of Gujarat. Six coastal<br />
and 3 inland salt affected districts of Gujarat<br />
were traversed and dominance of different<br />
halophytic species was identified. Different<br />
dominant halophytic species identified include<br />
Cressa cretica, Acacia catechu, Prosopis cineraria,<br />
Acacia catechu, Salvadora persica, Zizyphus<br />
nummularia, Tamarix ericoides, Suaeda maritime,<br />
Suaeda nudiflora, Aleuropus lagopoides, Avicennia<br />
spp. and Calatropis procera (Table 63). The<br />
rhizosphere soil samples from halophyte plant<br />
species were collected in duplicate from 27<br />
locations. Leaf, stem and root samples of the<br />
halophyte plants were also collected from each<br />
locations. One part of the rhizosphere soil sample<br />
were processed and analysed for soil physical<br />
and chemical properties and the other kept in<br />
refrigerator for isolation and characterization of<br />
dominant microbes. A laboratory experiment<br />
was conducted to evaluate the microbial activity<br />
as influenced by application of biological<br />
sludge and vermi compost under different<br />
salinity levels. It was observed that microbial<br />
activity significantly reduced when soil was<br />
irrigated with water of EC>10 dS m -1 (Fig. 44).<br />
However, biological sludge application helped<br />
in improving microbial activity. Pot studies<br />
Table 63 : Rhizosphere soil analysis of Halophyte<br />
species (from 4 locations each)<br />
Plant species pH 2<br />
EC 2<br />
Pilu (Salvadora persica)* 8.2 - 8.7 23.2 - 36.6<br />
Khair (Acacia catechu) 7.6 - 8.1 2.70 - 7.50<br />
Luni (Cressa cretica)* 7.9 - 8.3 16.8 - 28.3<br />
Luno (Suaeda maritima)* 7.8 - 8.4 19.4 - 33.5<br />
Ber (Zizyphus nummularia) 7.6 - 8.4 <strong>11</strong>.2 - 17.4<br />
Babool (Prosopis cineraria) 7.3 - 8.2 15.0 - 38.3<br />
Aak (Calatropis procera) 8.2 - 8.6 27.4 - 35.5<br />
Tamarix ericoides 8.1 - 8.8 32.4 - 37.1<br />
Aleuropus lagopoides* 7.9 - 8.7 31.4 - 39.6<br />
* Halophytes<br />
Fig. 44 : Microbial activity as influenced by salinity<br />
with different halophytes are being conducted<br />
to evaluate their salinity tolerance and their<br />
efficiency for salt uptake.<br />
Feasibility Study on Using Biological Sludge<br />
from Nitro-ETP Plant and Treated Effluent<br />
from Environmental Control Unit of GNFC<br />
(Unit 1) for Crop Production on Vertisols (G.<br />
Gururaja Rao, Sanjay Arora, M.K. Khandelwal,<br />
Anil R. Chinchmalatpure and D.K. Sharma)<br />
Environmental pollution is the major problem<br />
associated with rapid industrialisation,<br />
urbanisation and improved living standards<br />
of people. However, efforts are needed for<br />
controlling pollution resulting in the disposal<br />
of wastes by their conversion into utilisable<br />
raw materials. There are certain solid industrial<br />
wastes containing nutrients, manurial and<br />
ameliorative elements which can be used<br />
profitably in agriculture provided these are<br />
used scientifically and judiciously. Some of the<br />
industrial wastes like press mud containing<br />
high amounts of organic carbon and nutrients<br />
have the potential to improve the crop yields<br />
significantly.<br />
In the present study, attempts were made to<br />
explore and identify the feasibility of using the<br />
biological sludge (BS) generated from Nitro-<br />
ETP plant of Gujarat Narmada Valley Fertilizer<br />
Company, Bharuch in comparison to organic<br />
manures (OM) and their effect on crop performance<br />
and soil properties. Field experiments were<br />
conducted at Bharuch (Gujarat) with cowpea,<br />
cluster bean, Amaranth and lady’s finger to<br />
ascertain the response of biological sludge alone<br />
and in combination with organic manures<br />
viz;farm yard manure (FYM) and vermi compost<br />
(VC). Simultaneously, pot experiments were<br />
also conducted to test the efficacy of biological<br />
91
Reclamation and management of salt affected vertisols <strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
sludge in supplying nutrients to different crops<br />
viz; spinach and amaranth with treatments given<br />
in Table 64 and Table 65). The data of leaf yield<br />
of spinach obtained with two cuts indicated that<br />
biological sludge given along with NPK resulted<br />
in enhanced leaf yield, suggesting its efficacy in<br />
providing additional nutrient availability to the<br />
crop.<br />
Table 64 : Effect of organic manures and biological<br />
sludge on yield of spinach<br />
Treatments<br />
Vegetative yield (g pot -1 )<br />
1st Cut<br />
2nd Cut<br />
NPK (control) 8.6 24.9<br />
NPK+VC 1<br />
9.9 30.4<br />
NPK+BS 1<br />
10.8 31.4<br />
NPK+FYM 1<br />
8.9 26.9<br />
NPK+VC 2<br />
13.1 36.2<br />
NPK+BS 2<br />
13.7 39.2<br />
NPK+FYM 2<br />
10.1 30.9<br />
NPK+VC 1<br />
+BS 1<br />
15.0 38.3<br />
CD (5%) 1.1 3.8<br />
VC 1<br />
- First dose of vermicompost; VC 2<br />
- Second dose of<br />
vermicompost; BS 1<br />
- First dose of biological sludge; BS 2<br />
-<br />
Second dose of biological sludge<br />
The pots treated with biological sludge showed<br />
significant variation with all other treatments<br />
except the treatment comprising vermi compost<br />
given at full dose, suggesting biological sludge<br />
as an alternative nutrient source for leafy<br />
vegetables. However, in amaranth the biological<br />
sludge given in combination with NPK and/<br />
or FYM/Vermi compost gave higher leaf yield<br />
suggesting the additive effect of these manurial<br />
sources.<br />
Table 65 : Effect of organic manure and biological<br />
sludge on growth and yield of amaranth<br />
Treatments<br />
Vegetative<br />
tyield<br />
(g pot -1 )<br />
1st<br />
Cut<br />
2nd<br />
Cut<br />
Dry matter<br />
yield (g pot -1 )<br />
1st<br />
Cut<br />
2nd<br />
Cut<br />
NPK (control) 23.4 42.4 3.0 4.6<br />
NPK+FYM 25.8 45.8 3.4 5.4<br />
NPK+FYM 26.2 49.5 4.0 5.9<br />
NPK+VC 28.3 50.8 4.5 5.2<br />
NPK+BS 29.5 63.4 4.2 7.8<br />
NPK+1/2FYM<br />
+1/2BS<br />
NPK+1/2VC<br />
+1/2BS<br />
30.4 72.2 3.7 8.1<br />
31.7 77.9 5.1 8.2<br />
CD (5%) 3.3 8.4 1.2 0.8<br />
In the field study conducted with cluster bean<br />
using biological sludge and vermi compost<br />
@ 2 t ha -1 along with NPK, pod length and pod<br />
yield were found to be higher under biological<br />
sludge given in combination with organic<br />
manure (vermi compost) and NPK. Cluster<br />
bean, being the leguminous crop, responded to<br />
nitrogen rich NPK and Vermi compost (Table<br />
66). <strong>Soil</strong> samples collected at the initiation and<br />
completion of experiments indicated enrichment<br />
of soils with available N, P and K and with<br />
moderate increase in organic carbon suggesting<br />
the important role played by the biological<br />
sludge in soil enrichment (Table 67).<br />
Table 66 : Performance of cluster bean under biological sludge application<br />
Treatments<br />
Plant height<br />
(cm)<br />
Pods per plant<br />
45 DAS Maturity 45 DAS 60 DAS<br />
Pod length<br />
(cm)<br />
Yield<br />
(t ha -1 )<br />
NPK 62 72 8 <strong>11</strong> 7.4 5.12<br />
NPK+BS 73 94 <strong>11</strong> 17 9.2 7.67<br />
NPK+VC 78 105 13 18 10.3 9.46<br />
NPK+BS+VC 83 <strong>11</strong>2 15 22 <strong>11</strong>.2 9.66<br />
CD (5%) 9.7 14.5 2.5 4.8 1.8 2.16<br />
92
<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
Reclamation and management of salt affected vertisols<br />
Table 67 : Effect of biological sludge application on<br />
soil properties<br />
<strong>Soil</strong> properties Initial Final<br />
(after<br />
harvest of<br />
cowpea)<br />
pH (1:2.5) 8.2 8.1<br />
EC (dS m -1 ) 0.40 0.42<br />
Organic carbon (g kg -1 ) 4.4 5.6<br />
Available N (kg ha -1 ) 182 198<br />
Available P (kg ha -1 ) 14.2 16.4<br />
Available K (kg ha -1 ) <strong>11</strong>6 121<br />
Bulk density (mg m -1 ) 1.54 1.52<br />
Texture Clay Clay<br />
The biological sludge, due to the presence of<br />
important nutrients like nitrogen, phosphorus<br />
etc., form an ideal alternative nutrient source<br />
that meet the partial nutrient requirements of<br />
the crops. The studies indicated that the use<br />
of biological sludge from fertilizer industries<br />
can be a better option for sustainable<br />
management of lands for production of crops<br />
like leafy vegetables and cluster bean. Its use<br />
will help in improving soil properties visà-vis<br />
supply nutrients for plant growth and<br />
yield in Vertisols<br />
Farmers Participatory Action <strong>Research</strong> Project<br />
(FPARP) – at Bharuch (G. Gururaja Rao, M.K.<br />
Khandelwal, Anil R. Chinchmalatpure, Sanjay<br />
Arora, S.K. Kamra and Gurbachan Singh).<br />
Decline in water table has resulted in decline<br />
in farm productivity in Gujarat state due<br />
to deterioration in groundwater quality<br />
has resulted in increased pumping cost and<br />
associated environmental problem. Under<br />
FPARP project funded by Ministry of Water<br />
Resources (GOI), Regional <strong>Research</strong> Station,<br />
Bharuch has installed 15 recharge wells and<br />
renovated 4 farm ponds in Bharuch district<br />
(Fig. 45).<br />
Installation of recharge well involved drilling of<br />
400 mm dia bores and lowering of <strong>11</strong>0 mm dia<br />
PVC pipes, two blank and three strainers and<br />
filling with aggregates of 8-20 mm size followed<br />
by compressor to a depth of 30 m at almost<br />
Fig 45 : Location map of recharge sites<br />
under the FPARP Project<br />
all places (Borebhata, Kavitha, Kurchan and<br />
Samni) except at Chhapra (25.5 m due to quick<br />
sand flown in). Only at village Moriyana, due to<br />
rocky formation, the same was cut with cutter<br />
of 175 mm dia to a depth of 45 m and placement<br />
of 200 mm dia PVC pipe to a depth to top 6 m.<br />
The design features and the cost components<br />
are given in Table 68.<br />
Looking at the rocky formation at this site, the<br />
centre has taken another site at village Netrang<br />
close to Moriyana, where excavation to 40.5 m<br />
could be restricted. So far, it has been noticed<br />
that the water-table just after excavation of the<br />
recharge bore well gained certain depth due<br />
to flow of rain and runoff down the chamber.<br />
Quality of groundwater also improved during<br />
the same period. Similarly, the locations where<br />
the other recharge wells were constructed<br />
have also shown rise in water-table levels with<br />
significant improvement in the water quality.<br />
Groundwater recharge has helped in<br />
rise of water table at all the locations.<br />
The groundwater salinity has decreased<br />
considerably. Due to the recharging of the<br />
groundwater, the water quality at the farm<br />
was extended by few months so as to enable<br />
the farmers to give adequate irrigation to the<br />
crops. Some farmers have reported additional<br />
revenue due to prolonged water availability<br />
and improved water quality<br />
93
Reclamation and management of salt affected vertisols <strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
Table 68 : Location, design features and the cost of recharge wells<br />
Village,<br />
Taluka<br />
Month<br />
Depth<br />
(m)<br />
Bore<br />
Diameter<br />
(mm)<br />
Pipe<br />
Lithology Slits Compressor<br />
usage<br />
<br />
Cost<br />
(`)<br />
Moriyana, Valia<br />
Chhapra,<br />
Ankleshwar<br />
Borebhata,<br />
Ankleshwar<br />
Netrang, Valia<br />
Kavitha, Bharuch<br />
Kavitha, Bharuch<br />
Kurchan, Amod<br />
Samni, Amod<br />
Jhagadiya,<br />
Jhagadiya<br />
Finchwara,<br />
Jhagadiya<br />
June<br />
2008<br />
June<br />
2008<br />
June<br />
2008<br />
Nov.<br />
2008<br />
1, March<br />
2009<br />
2, March<br />
2009<br />
April<br />
2009<br />
April<br />
2009<br />
April<br />
2009<br />
April<br />
2009<br />
45.0 250/175* 200 Rocky -1.75<br />
m after 6 m<br />
of medium<br />
black soil<br />
30.0 400 125 Deep to<br />
medium<br />
black soils,<br />
river sand<br />
after 12 m<br />
3-75<br />
mm<br />
14850<br />
-do- 22535<br />
30.0 400 125 -do- -do- 25760<br />
40.5 250/175* 125 Rocky -do- 16650<br />
36.0 400 125 Med. Bl. <strong>Soil</strong><br />
with kankar<br />
from 24-30<br />
m<br />
-do- 23650<br />
30.0 400 125 -do- -do- 21500<br />
30.0 400 125 Deep black<br />
soils with<br />
kankar up to<br />
5.6 m depth<br />
-do- 24620<br />
30.0 400 125 - do- -do- 30727<br />
30.0 400 125 Med. Bl.<br />
River sand<br />
and murram<br />
at 27-30 m<br />
-do- 21500<br />
30.0 400 125 - do- -do- 25100<br />
Juna Tavra,<br />
Bharuch<br />
June<br />
2009<br />
30.0 400 125 Med to deep<br />
black soils<br />
-do- 29800<br />
Luna 1,<br />
Valia<br />
Luna 2,<br />
Valia<br />
June<br />
2009<br />
30.0 400 125 Medium to<br />
light black<br />
soils sand<br />
after 21 m<br />
-do- 23500<br />
May.10 30.0 400 125 -do- -do- 26500<br />
Pansoli, Valia<br />
Sodgam, Valia<br />
May.<br />
<strong>2010</strong><br />
May.<br />
<strong>2010</strong><br />
30.0 400 125 Med. To<br />
light black<br />
soil sand<br />
after 30 m<br />
-do- 26500<br />
30.0 400 125 -do- -do- 33600<br />
* 175 mm dia bore after 6 m depth<br />
94
<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
RECLAMATION AND MANAGEMENT OF COASTAL SALINE SOILS<br />
Use of Available Brackish and Fresh Water<br />
in the Coastal Area for Integrated Cultivation<br />
of Crops and Fishes (B.K. Bandyopadhyay,<br />
D. Burman, S.K. Sarangi, S. Mandal, K.K.<br />
Mahanta and B. Maji)<br />
A study was undertaken to increase the crop<br />
productivity and cropping intensity in the<br />
coastal area through rainwater harvesting and<br />
integrated crop-fish cultivation by utilizing<br />
natural water resources. For this purpose, an<br />
area of 2 ha at <strong>CSSRI</strong>, RRS, Canning town farm<br />
was reshaped into the following five different<br />
land shaping models. The cropping schedule<br />
followed under the different land shaping is<br />
given in Table 69.<br />
The land shaping models created a scope for<br />
multi-cropping instead of mono cropping (as in<br />
control plots) due to creation of different land<br />
types. Various crops like vegetables, fruits, field<br />
crops could be cultivated during rabi/summer<br />
season due to harvesting of rainwater which<br />
was used for life saving irrigations. The yield<br />
of each crop was converted into rice equivalent<br />
yield (REY) on sale price basis for comparison<br />
and presented in Table 70.<br />
Based on the experiments conducted during<br />
2009-10, economics of various land shaping<br />
models were calculated and the farm pond<br />
model emerged as the most profitable land<br />
shaping model with highest Benefit-Cost ratio of<br />
2.33 followed by paddy-cum-fish, deep furrow<br />
and high ridge, shallow furrow and ridge and<br />
paddy-cum-brackish water fish. All the land<br />
shaping models were generating higher net<br />
returns over the control plot (Table 71).<br />
The land shaping technologies also reduced the<br />
salinity build-up in soil of raised lands during<br />
dry months due to increased height of land from<br />
the brackish ground water and stored the rain<br />
water (fresh water) in the field. The soil salinity<br />
(ECe) in raised land of farm pond model was 4-5<br />
dS m -1 during the month of February compared<br />
to 6-7 dS m -1 in the control (Fig. 46).<br />
Appropriate land shaping has substantial<br />
scope in coastal areas for utilization of water<br />
resources and increasing farm income through<br />
integrated crop-fish cultivation<br />
Table 69 : Cropping schedule in different land shaping models<br />
Land shaping models Land type Kharif Rabi<br />
Paddy-cum-fish (PCF)<br />
Original land Paddy, fish Cotton, sunflower<br />
Bund Vegetables Vegetables<br />
Furrow Fish Fish<br />
Original land Paddy, fish Fish<br />
PCF-brackishwater fishery<br />
Bund Vegetables Vegetables<br />
Furrow Fish Fish<br />
Pond Fish Fish<br />
Farm pond<br />
Upland Vegetables Vegetables<br />
Medium land Short duration rice Sunflower, groundnut<br />
Low land Paddy Paddy, Kalmi sag<br />
Deep ridge and furrow Ridge Vegetables Vegetables<br />
Shallow furrow and medium<br />
ridge<br />
Furrow Fish Rice<br />
Ridge Fruits Fruits<br />
Furrow Fish Fish, paddy<br />
95
Reclamation and management of coastal saline soils <strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
Table 70 : Crop yield in the raised land of the farm pond<br />
Crop Variety Season Yield<br />
(t ha -1 )<br />
Price<br />
( ` kg -1 )<br />
REY<br />
(t ha -1 )<br />
Spinach Haldi bari Rabi 8.37 8.00 8.37<br />
Radish Pusa red Rabi 20.70 8.00 20.70<br />
Sugarbeet Ruby ball Rabi 18.75 6.00 14.06<br />
Cowpea Laffa Rabi 7.50 10.00 9.38<br />
Okra Avantika Kharif 8.85 20.00 22.16<br />
Amaranthus White kanta Rabi <strong>11</strong>.67 10.00 14.58<br />
Chilli Surya mukhi Summer 0.20 50.00 1.25<br />
Bitter gourd Meghalay Summer 17.50 20.00 43.75<br />
Bottle gourd Local Summer 26.25 10.00 32.81<br />
Basella Local Kharif 58.33 10.00 72.92<br />
Brinjal Local Kharif 7.17 10.00 8.96<br />
French bean Sel.9 Kharif 14.50 8.00 14.50<br />
Rice Local Kharif 2.20 8.00 2.20<br />
REY- Rice equivalent yield<br />
Table 71 : Economics of land shaping models<br />
Models<br />
(Total area)<br />
Total cost<br />
(` actual area -1 )<br />
Operational cost and returns (kharif + rabi)<br />
Total return<br />
( ` actual area -1 )<br />
Net return<br />
(` actual area -1 )<br />
B : C<br />
ratio<br />
I. Control (0.51 ha) 8,995 9,766 771 1.09 (6)<br />
II. Paddy-cum-fish<br />
(PCF) + field crops<br />
(0.51 ha)<br />
III. PCF (kharif) +<br />
Brackishwater fish<br />
(rabi) (0.52 ha)<br />
IV. Farm pond (FP)<br />
(0.36 ha)<br />
V. Deep furrow & high<br />
ridge (DF) (0.22 ha)<br />
VI. Shallow furrow &<br />
ridge (SF) (0.21 ha)<br />
23,997 53,696 29,698 2.24 (2)<br />
47,003 93,142 46,140 1.98 (4)<br />
18,098 42,201 24,103 2.33 (1)<br />
12,155 26,882 14,728 2.21 (3)<br />
12,979 26,820 13,840 2.07 (5)<br />
Value in brackets is rank of model based on B:C ratio<br />
Effect of Waterlogging on Tree Species for<br />
Agroforestry System in Coastal Salt Affected<br />
<strong>Soil</strong>s (D. Burman, B.K. Bandyopadhyay and<br />
A.R. Bal)<br />
Fig.46 : Variation of soil salinity in different land<br />
shaping models<br />
Diversification of agriculture through<br />
introduction of agroforestry systems in less<br />
diversified low-lying salt affected areas may<br />
enhance the farm income vis-a-vis livelihood<br />
96
<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
Reclamation and management of coastal saline soils<br />
security of the farming communities of coastal<br />
region. However, growing of tree species in most<br />
of the coastal land is quite impossible as it remains<br />
waterlogged for 5 months during monsoon and<br />
post-monsoon periods. Therefore, for growing<br />
tree species in the low-lying coastal area, the area<br />
was reshaped to different heights. Seven tree<br />
species viz; Eucalyptus sp., Acacia auriculiformis,<br />
Casuarina sp., Syzygium cumini, Heritiera fomes,<br />
Brugeria gymnorhiza and Xylocarpus mekongensis<br />
have been evaluated for their suitability for<br />
growing under 4 waterlogged situations (during<br />
kharif ) viz; lowland (upto 50 cm waterlogging),<br />
medium lowland (upto 25 cm waterlogging),<br />
medium upland (5 cm above water level) and<br />
upland (35 cm above water level). Waterlogging<br />
during kharif season affected the growth of all<br />
the tree species evaluated under 4 waterlogging<br />
situations. Syzygium, Casuarina, Heritieria and<br />
Xylocarpus survived initially but died gradually<br />
up to 4 th year of experiment under low land<br />
situation where continuous waterlogging<br />
prevailed throughout the kharif season. Though<br />
Acacia, Eucalyptus and Brugeria survived even<br />
in 5 th year of experimentation, however, their<br />
survival rate was very low (20-30%). The height<br />
and diameter of these tree species increased<br />
gradually from low land to upland situations,<br />
the highest being in upland situation (Table<br />
72). The growth parameters like height and<br />
diameter of Syzygium, Casuarina, Heritieria and<br />
Xylocarpus increased from medium low land to<br />
medium upland and medium upland to upland<br />
situations. Compared to previous year, the<br />
growth of all the tree species was better in the<br />
medium upland and upland situations than in<br />
low land and medium lowland situations. The<br />
better growth of trees in raised land situations<br />
could be due to better aeration of root zone soil<br />
in kharif and, more availability of soil moisture<br />
and less build-up of soil salinity in rabi/summer.<br />
After monsoon period, the trenches (formed due<br />
to land shaping) were filled up with rain water,<br />
which resulted in higher moisture content of the<br />
adjoining land areas and thus, more availability<br />
of soil moisture to the trees. This also resulted<br />
in less build-up of soil salinity due to reduced<br />
upward capillary flow of saline ground water at<br />
shallow depth. The salinity (ECe, dSm -1 ) buildup<br />
in the soil during the month of May was in<br />
the order of upland < medium upland < medium<br />
lowland < low land < original low land (Fig. 47).<br />
However, no change in soil pH was observed<br />
under different land situations. The paddycum-fish<br />
were grown in the interspaces of trees<br />
in kharif season and, average yield of rice (var.<br />
SR26 B) and fish (Indian major carps) were 3.88 t<br />
ha -1 and 1.01 t ha -1 , respectively. In rabi/summer<br />
rice and cotton were grown in the trenches and<br />
inter-spaces (flat lands), respectively. The yield<br />
of rice (var. Canning 7) was 4.24 t ha -1 and of<br />
cotton (var.LRA 5166) 1.96 t ha -1 .<br />
Table 72 : Effect of waterlogging on tree height and diameter (April, <strong>2010</strong>)<br />
Tree sps.<br />
Acacia<br />
auriculiformis<br />
Height<br />
(cm)<br />
Lowland Medium lowland Medium upland Upland<br />
Diameter<br />
(mm)<br />
Height<br />
(cm)<br />
Diameter<br />
(mm)<br />
Height<br />
(cm)<br />
Diameter<br />
(mm)<br />
Height<br />
(cm)<br />
Diameter<br />
(mm)<br />
149.08 36.59 316.49 54.59 322.50 69.37 396.41 71.71<br />
Syzygium<br />
cumini<br />
- - 172.04 45.18 228.28 64.41 231.83 66.77<br />
Eucalyptus<br />
spc.<br />
283.17 57.80 415.19 74.24 421.16 79.27 466.06 80.05<br />
Casuarina - - 538.77 70.69 170.33 37.23 556.67 82.73<br />
Heritieria<br />
fomes<br />
Xylocarpus<br />
mekongensis<br />
Brugeria<br />
gymnorhiza<br />
- - <strong>11</strong>3.43 23.12 539.85 81.58 157.22 35.18<br />
- - 135.91 34.65 156.09 35.28 160.72 39.15<br />
52.50 19.09 78.40 29.31 87.65 31.91 89.72 29.41<br />
97
Reclamation and management of coastal saline soils <strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
Paddy-cum-fish cultivation in kharif Cultivation of rice and cotton in rabi / summer<br />
Paradeep (Orissa)<br />
<strong>Soil</strong> and crops<br />
Fig. 47: <strong>Soil</strong> salinity and pH at different land<br />
situation during dry period (May)<br />
Agroforestry can be practiced on coastal<br />
waterlogged lowlands with appropriate<br />
land shaping. The best suited trees under<br />
the situation were: Eucalyptus sps., Acacia<br />
auriculiformis and Casuarina sps.<br />
Assessment of Salt Affected <strong>Soil</strong>s and Cropping<br />
Pattern of Coastal West Bengal, Orissa and<br />
Andhra Pradesh (S. K. Sarangi, K. K. Mahanta,<br />
Subhasis Mandal and B. Maji)<br />
The project was initiated with an objective to<br />
study the soil salinity problems and cropping<br />
pattern followed in the coastal states of West<br />
Bengal, Orissa and Andhra Pradesh with special<br />
reference to the areas near the major ports of<br />
the respective states viz; Haldia, Paradeep and<br />
Visakhapatnam. Information on soil and water<br />
salinity, cropping etc. colleted from the villages<br />
near Paradeep (Orissa) and Haldia (West Bengal)<br />
are summarized below:<br />
Saline soils are found in the Ersama and Kujanga<br />
blocks in the district of Jagatsinghpur of Orissa.<br />
The soils are deep to very deep, mostly well<br />
drained except poorly drained in some areas<br />
with shallow water table, sandy to fine loamy,<br />
moderate to strong saline with acidic to neutral<br />
pH. The farming community is mostly dominated<br />
by marginal farmers (average holding size 1.2<br />
ha). Rice is the main crop with rice-fallow, rice–<br />
green gram and rice–rice cropping pattern. Rice–<br />
fallow is covering majority of the area. Rice–rice<br />
is followed in few areas where there is canal<br />
irrigation facility, however, the area under this<br />
cropping system is very less. Rice–green gram<br />
is followed in the areas where the soil salinity<br />
problem is moderate and life saving irrigation<br />
for this crop is provided from canal.<br />
Rice varieties grown<br />
Farmers mainly grow local salt tolerant rice<br />
varieties as well as high yielding salt tolerant<br />
varieties released by <strong>Central</strong> Rice <strong>Research</strong><br />
Institute, Cuttack. The local varieties are late<br />
maturing (6-7 months) and grain quality is bold<br />
(Table 73).<br />
Indigenous salinity control measures<br />
Following practices were followed by the<br />
farmers to reduce the effect of soil salinity on<br />
rice crop.<br />
98
<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
Reclamation and management of coastal saline soils<br />
Table 73 : Rice varieties grown in the salt affected soils of Paradeep area<br />
Village<br />
Local<br />
Rice varieties grown<br />
High yielding varieties<br />
Nimakana<br />
Harisankar, Basumati, Gudumati, Chaka Akhi,<br />
Baragali, Kadala Gaura, Betanasi<br />
Varsha Dhan, Gayatri (CR 1018),<br />
Puja, Swarna<br />
Badilo Baula pakhia, Kalamula, Matia, Budha manda CR 1590, Gayatri, Lunishree<br />
Saraba Raspanjar, Malabati, Basupati, Bhaluki Masuri, CR 1009, Durga<br />
Sandhapur<br />
Machhakanta, Basupati, Kaidisola, Bhundi,<br />
Pagnigola, Benambari<br />
Mahalaxmi, Swarna, Masuri, Puja,<br />
CR 1009, CR 1018, Durga, Sonamani<br />
distribution of rainfall which includes occurrence<br />
of drought after sowing of the crops or towards<br />
the end of the wet season, heavy rainfall at the<br />
maturity of crop resulting in submergence of the<br />
crop, scarcity of quality irrigation water, nonavailability<br />
of good quality seeds of salt tolerant<br />
varieties of crops etc.<br />
Saline water table at depth of 1 m from surface in<br />
the Saraba village (Ersama block, Jagatsinghpur<br />
district, Orissa) in the month of January<br />
Application of tamarind (Tamarindus indica)<br />
leaf manure<br />
The dried tamarind leaves are collected from<br />
the base of the plant which are accumulated<br />
after senescence and put in the cow dung pit<br />
for decomposition. The decomposed manure is<br />
applied in the field after primary tillage.<br />
Green manuring of horse gram (Macrotyloma<br />
uniflorum)<br />
Locally called Kolatha, a hardy leguminous<br />
plant with twining branches is sown in the first<br />
week of June and allowed to grow till July and<br />
ploughed back into the soil.<br />
Constraints to crop cultivation<br />
The major constraints apart from salinity for<br />
successful crop cultivation in the salt affected<br />
areas near Paradeep are: erratic and uneven<br />
The scope to increase the cropping intensity and<br />
crop production in the area largely depends<br />
onthe management of soil salinity, saving<br />
of water for irrigation, selection of suitable<br />
cropping and nutrient management systems<br />
involving salt tolerant varieties of crops. With<br />
proper water management, it may be possible<br />
to include pulses, oilseeds and vegetables in the<br />
rice-based crop production system during the<br />
dry season.<br />
Contingent cropping<br />
Many times there is failure or very poor yield of<br />
rice crop due to build-up of salinity, particularly<br />
during the year of insufficient or erratic rainfall<br />
resulting in poor washing out of the salts<br />
deposited in the root zone of the crops. In these<br />
situation, crops like bitter gourd, amaranthus,<br />
radish and basella (locally called poi) are grown.<br />
These crops are cultivated in small basins,<br />
created in the patches in the failed rice field,<br />
which later on cover a major portion of the area.<br />
The crops, which are less water requiring, short<br />
duration and having salt tolerance are grown<br />
with application of farm yard manure in the<br />
root zone before sowing of seeds in the basins.<br />
99
Reclamation and management of coastal saline soils <strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
Contingent crop cultivated in the saline soil in the<br />
Sandhapur village (Kujanga block, Jagatsinghpur<br />
district, Orissa)<br />
Haldia (West Bengal)<br />
<strong>Soil</strong> and crops<br />
The area is surrounded by the rivers Hugly<br />
(Rupnarayan) and Haldi, the former carries<br />
relatively sweet water while the later brings saline<br />
water to the region through two canals locally<br />
called Jamunetri and Gangotri, which also drains<br />
the area. However, the area is poorly drained and<br />
soil is characterized by silty clay texture, slight to<br />
moderate saline with acidic to neutral pH, slow<br />
permeability, suitable for rice cultivation with<br />
water table at around 10 m from the ground level.<br />
The farming community is mostly dominated<br />
by small and marginal farmers. Rice is the main<br />
crop during kharif season, of which around 60 per<br />
cent area is under HYVs, while rest is under local<br />
varieties. During rabi season, the main crops are<br />
rice, lathyrus, vegetables, potato and sunflower.<br />
Crops like coconut, betelvine etc. are found in<br />
few patches.<br />
Rice varieties grown<br />
High yielding as well as local traditional varieties<br />
of rice are grown depending upon the depth<br />
of water and type of land. In the waterlogged<br />
land, local varieties viz; Khairsal, Pani Kalas ,<br />
Paloi, Patnai, NC Kalam etc. are grown. The local<br />
fine grain rice variety Dudheswar is grown in<br />
medium land along with HYVs like MTU 7029,<br />
Sabita, Swarnamayee, Swarnashree, IR 36,<br />
Geetanjali, Ranjit etc.<br />
Constraints to crop cultivation<br />
Drainage during heavy rains is a serious problem<br />
and there is ingress of saline seawater through<br />
Haldi river making the land saline. There is lack<br />
<strong>Soil</strong> profile studied during the month of March 20<strong>11</strong><br />
at Haldia (West Bengal)<br />
of irrigation facility during rabi/summer season<br />
in many villages resulting in monocropping<br />
of rice during kharif season only. As the area<br />
is situated nearest to the industrial area so the<br />
labour cost is very high making is difficult to get<br />
labour for agricultural purpose.<br />
Saline soils are found in the Ersama<br />
and Kujanga blocks in the district of<br />
Jagatsinghpur. The soils are deep to very deep,<br />
mostly well drained with shallow water table<br />
(about 1.0 m), sandy to fine loamy, moderate<br />
to strong saline with acidic to neutral pH.<br />
The soils at Haldia and Mahishadal blocks<br />
under East Midnapore were mostly poorly<br />
drained, having slow permeability, medium<br />
to heavy in texture, slight to moderate saline<br />
with acidic to neutral pH, suitable for rice<br />
cultivation and the water table, on an average,<br />
depth of 10.0 m from ground<br />
Exploration of Artificial Groundwater<br />
Recharge of Fresh Water Aquifers in Coastal<br />
Regions of West Bengal (K.K. Mahanta, S.K.<br />
Kamra, S. Kumar and D. Burman)<br />
In coastal region of West Bengal, the rainwater is<br />
in excess than the crop demand in the monsoon<br />
period and remains ponded on the surface,<br />
mostly in cropped paddy fields, reducing the<br />
productivity of the lands. In the remaining part<br />
of the year, the rainfall is erratic and inadequate<br />
to meet the evapotranspiration of the crops.<br />
100
<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
Reclamation and management of coastal saline soils<br />
Fresh water scarcity in the non-monsoon period<br />
is the major problem of the area. Shallow tube<br />
wells were installed since almost a decade and<br />
ground water was exploited for increasing the<br />
cropping intensity. The over exploitation of<br />
ground water has affected the functioning of<br />
the tube wells due to depletion of the water<br />
table and also deteriorated the water quality.<br />
Therefore, artificial recharge to fresh water<br />
aquifers is required.<br />
From the data collected from primary and<br />
secondary sources, it was found that some parts<br />
of South 24 Parganas districts are conducive for<br />
artificial recharge. Three villages in this district<br />
namely Andharia, Chandkhali and Bahirsona<br />
were surveyed regarding installation of shallow<br />
tube wells and utilization of groundwater.<br />
Mostly, the high water requiring crop i.e. paddy<br />
is cultivated utilizing the groundwater. The<br />
groundwater from the shallow tube wells were<br />
tested and found that the salinity increased in<br />
the summer. The fresh water aquifer, which is<br />
exploited by the shallow tube wells, was in the<br />
range 90-120 m and is of better quality than the<br />
shallow tube wells in the range 72-90 m. The<br />
diameter of the tube wells varied from 62.5 mm<br />
and 75 mm. The design of the filter chamber<br />
for artificial recharge to fresh water aquifers is<br />
given in Fig. 48.<br />
Fig. 48 : The design of the filter for artificial recharge<br />
through tube well<br />
Socio-economic Impact of Improved<br />
Technologies in the Coastal Areas of West<br />
Bengal (Subhasis Mandal, S.K. Sarangi, D.<br />
Burman and B.K. Bandyopadhyay)<br />
Coastal agriculture is commonly characterized<br />
by complex, risk prone and fragile ecosystem.<br />
Efforts are being made to improve the<br />
productivity of farming systems in the coastal<br />
region. This project envisaged to analyse the<br />
socio-economic impact of some key technologies<br />
or best management practices that are being<br />
tried under farmers’ field condition. The project<br />
was initiated during 2009-10 in coastal areas<br />
of Sundarbans (West Bengal). Site selection<br />
has been done and baseline information was<br />
collected from the adopters and non-adopters of<br />
improved technologies as promoted by <strong>CSSRI</strong>,<br />
RRS Canning Town. Major technologies targeted<br />
for socio-economic study are various land<br />
shaping technologies such as farm pond, ridge<br />
& furrow and paddy-cum-fish and adoption of<br />
improved rice varieties both in kharif and rabi<br />
season. The economics of dominating farming<br />
systems have been analysed and database on<br />
socio-economic condition of farmers are being<br />
analysed.<br />
The baseline information indicated that majority<br />
of farmers (85%) in the study area were belonging<br />
to weaker section of the society (primarily SC)<br />
and 94 percent of the farmers were marginal<br />
land-holders, rest were small-farmers (1.7 %) and<br />
landless (4.1 %). The land situation is primarily<br />
dominated by low lying (76%) followed by<br />
medium (15%) and upland (9%). Despite having<br />
low return, agriculture was the main occupation<br />
and nearly 42 per cent of the farm families were<br />
primarily dependent on agriculture. In absence<br />
of gainful livelihood options in the local area,<br />
migration to nearby cities is quite prevalent (32%<br />
of farm families) in the study area for search<br />
of alternative livelihood options. Cropping<br />
intensity in the study area was calculated to be<br />
quite low at 120-125 per cent and the cropping<br />
pattern was dominated by the kharif paddy.<br />
Major cropping systems prevailing in the study<br />
area were rice-fallow or rice-rice. The proposed<br />
technological interventions are envisaged to<br />
enhance the cropping intensity as well as farm<br />
income through creation of water resources by<br />
harvesting and storing of rainwater at farm level<br />
Majority of farmers (85%) in the study area<br />
belonged to weaker section of the society<br />
(primarily SC) and 94 percent of the farmers<br />
were marginal land holders, rest were<br />
small and landless. The land situation is<br />
primarily dominated by low-lying followed<br />
by medium and upland<br />
101
Reclamation and management of coastal saline soils <strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
and through promotion of integrated cropping<br />
systems like rice–rice + vegetables and rice +<br />
vegetables– rice + vegetables.<br />
Evaluation of Rice Varieties for Coastal Saline<br />
<strong>Soil</strong>s (S.K. Sarangi, A.R. Bal and B. Maji)<br />
Evaluation of varieties/lines for rabi season<br />
During rabi 2009-10, a set of 31 varieties/lines was<br />
transplanted on 17 th February, <strong>2010</strong>. The yield of<br />
the entries is given in Table 74. Out of these, IR<br />
30864, CSR 39 and CSRC (S) 47-B-1-1 produced<br />
grain yields of 5.93, 5.85, 5.61 t ha -1 , respectively.<br />
Maintenance and evaluation of rice germplasm/<br />
varieties for low land ecosystem<br />
During kharif <strong>2010</strong>, seventy two rice germplasm/<br />
varieties/lines released/developed by <strong>CSSRI</strong>,<br />
Karnal, IRRI and <strong>CSSRI</strong>, RRS, Canning were<br />
evaluated in a replicated trial under saline stress<br />
condition (ECe: 5.2 dS m -1 ). The result revealed<br />
that highest grain yield was obtained from IR<br />
76393-28-7-1-1-3-1 (4.59 t ha -1 ), followed by Amal<br />
Mana (3.74 t ha -1 ) and CSR 4 (3.56 t ha -1 ).<br />
Maintenance and evaluation of rice germplasm/<br />
varieties for semi-deep and deep water<br />
ecosystem<br />
Promising local rice germplasm along with<br />
released varieties from <strong>CSSRI</strong>, RRS, Canning<br />
and RRS, Chinsurah for semi-deep and deep<br />
water situations were maintained and evaluated<br />
during the kharif season-<strong>2010</strong> (Table 75). Out of<br />
twenty one rice varieties/ lines/germplasm<br />
evaluated, CSRC(D) 13-16-9 produced highest<br />
grain yield of 2.33 t ha -1 , followed by CSRC (D)<br />
7-0-4 (2.26 t ha -1 ) and CSRC (D) 12-8-12 (2.24 t<br />
ha -1 ).<br />
The promising lines of rice under coastal<br />
saline soil condition were: IR 30864, IR<br />
76393 - 28-7-1-1-3-1 and CSRC(D) 13-16-9 for<br />
rabi season, low land and semi-deep water<br />
situation, respectively<br />
Stress Tolerant Rice for Coastal soil (<strong>CSSRI</strong>,<br />
RRS, Canning Town) (B.K. Bandyopadhyay,<br />
D. Burman, A.R. Bal, S.K. Sarangi and Subhasis<br />
Mandal)<br />
A participatory research programme was<br />
undertaken under Bill and Melinda Gates<br />
Foundation (BMGF) in collaboration with<br />
IRRI, Philippines to increase the productivity<br />
of rice under salinity stress for poor farming<br />
communities of coastal region. The major thrust<br />
was to identify most suitable varieties/lines<br />
of rice along with their management practices<br />
Table 74 : Rice varieties/lines for rabi season<br />
Sr.<br />
No.<br />
Variety<br />
Grain yield<br />
(t ha -1 )<br />
Sr. No.<br />
Variety<br />
Grain yield<br />
(t ha -1 )<br />
1 CSR23 2.52 17 CSRC(S)50-B-B-B-3-3 5.25<br />
2 CSR27 2.71 18 IR30864 5.93<br />
3 CSR29 3.04 19 PUSA NR580-6 5.52<br />
4 CSR31 2.53 20 CSRC(S)33-9-B-B-3-3 3.55<br />
5 CSR32 2.87 21 CSRC(S)39-B-1-B-3-3 5.12<br />
6 CSR33 3.67 22 CSRC(S)50-2-1-1-4-B 4.50<br />
7 CSR34 4.<strong>11</strong> 23 CSRC(S)49-B-B-B-3-3 3.28<br />
8 CSR35 4.35 24 CSRC(S)53-B-1-B-1 4.87<br />
9 CSR36 2.88 25 CSRC(S)47-7-B-B-1-1 5.12<br />
10 CSR39 5.85 26 RP2525-124-98-3 5.02<br />
<strong>11</strong> IR10206-29-2-1-1 4.35 27 IR77664-B-25-1-2-3-12 5.19<br />
12 IR52280-<strong>11</strong>7-1-1-3 5.62 28 IR75395-23-B-19-B-2-1-B 4.92<br />
13 CANNING-7 4.62 29 IR7634646-B-B-10-1-1-1 5.56<br />
14 CSR-4 5.06 30 IR76393-28-7-1-1-3-1 5.51<br />
15 CSRC(S)32-B-B-B-3-3 5.31 31 CSRC(S)47-B-1-1 5.61<br />
16 CSRC(S)36-B-B-B-2-B 4.69<br />
102
<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
Reclamation and management of coastal saline soils<br />
Varietal trial of rice during rabi season for coastal areas<br />
Promising rice varieties/lines for coastal low land ecosystem<br />
Table 75 : Rice germplasm/varieties/lines tested under semi-deep and deep water ecosystem<br />
Sr.<br />
No.<br />
Entries<br />
Grain yield<br />
(t ha -1 )<br />
Sr. No.<br />
Entries<br />
Grain yield<br />
(t ha -1 )<br />
1 Gavir Saru 1.88 12 CSRC(D) 5-2-2-2 1.72<br />
2 NC 678 1.16 13 Sada Mota Selection 0.92<br />
3 Asfal 0.92 14 Najani 1.72<br />
4 C 300 BD-50-<strong>11</strong> 2.04 15 Tilak Kanchari 1.81<br />
5 CSRC(D) 2-17-5 1.99 16 Manaswarabar 0.81<br />
6 CSRC(D) 2-0-8 1.92 17 Nalini 2.04<br />
7 CSRC(D) 7-5-4 1.99 18 Ambika 1.74<br />
8 CSRC(D) 12-8-12 2.24 19 Purnendu 2.08<br />
9 CSRC(D) 13-16-9 2.33 20 Dinesh 1.27<br />
10 CSRC(D) 7-12-1 2.12 21 Patnai 23 1.25<br />
<strong>11</strong> CSRC(D) 7-0-4 2.26<br />
through Participatory Varietal Selection (PVS)<br />
thereby enabling the poor farmers of the eastern<br />
coastal areas of the country to grow more food,<br />
generate more income, and to reduce poverty<br />
and hunger.<br />
Participatory Varietal Selection (PVS) trials in<br />
rabi/summer season<br />
During rabi/summer season, five Mother trials<br />
(1 on-station and 4 on-farm) at <strong>CSSRI</strong>, RRS,<br />
Canning Town and villages of Chandkhali,<br />
103
Reclamation and management of coastal saline soils <strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
Nikarighata and Nimpith of South 24 Parganas<br />
district and at village Sandeshkhali of North<br />
24 Parganas district of West Bengal, India in<br />
the coastal Sunderbans region were conducted<br />
under this project. Rice varieties/lines<br />
viz;Bidhan 2, Canning 7, Annada, Lalat, Rasi<br />
(IET 1444), Super minikit, Boby and Sankar<br />
Saru were included in the trial. The Preferential<br />
Analysis (PA) was conducted at both on-station<br />
and on-farm situation involving both male and<br />
female farmers. The results of PA revealed that<br />
Bidhan 2 was the most preferred rice variety of<br />
the farmers at both the situations at all locations.<br />
However, the 2 nd most preferred rice varieties<br />
varied at different locations and it was Annada<br />
at <strong>CSSRI</strong>, RRS, Canning Town and Nimpith,<br />
Canning 7 at Chandkhali & Sandeshkhali, and<br />
Boby at Nikarighata. In PA, Lalat and Super<br />
minikit emerged as least preferred varieties.<br />
Farmers’ did not prefer these 2 varieties because<br />
of the traits like, less tolerant to salinity, very tall<br />
plants, comparatively more maturity duration,<br />
less grain weight, short panicle length and low<br />
yield. The grain yield of different varieties of<br />
rice at different locations is given in Table 76.<br />
A total of 20 trials managed by farmers (Baby<br />
trials) were conducted in rabi/summer season in<br />
the salt affected coastal villages of Chandkhali,<br />
Nikarighata, Dumki and Nimpith. For Baby<br />
trials, each farmer were given 3 elite varieties/<br />
lines of rice, which emerged as most preferred<br />
varieties from the Mother trials conducted in<br />
the previous year. The varieties/lines, which<br />
were included in the Baby trial, are Bidhan 2,<br />
Canning 7 and Lalminikit.<br />
The results showed that the variation in grain<br />
yield under Baby trials is mainly due to the<br />
difference in management practices adopted<br />
by the farmers (Table 77). Farmers who applied<br />
recommended dose of fertilizers received higher<br />
grain yield of rice compared to the farmers<br />
who applied less than recommended dose of<br />
fertilizer.<br />
Participation of farmers of village Chandkhali in<br />
Lalminikit 2.63 – 4.50<br />
preferential analysis<br />
Table 76 : Grain yield of rice entries/varieties in PVS Mother trials (rabi/summer season 2009-10)<br />
Name of the<br />
variety<br />
Table 77 : The grain yield of rice varieties under<br />
baby trials<br />
Variety Grain yield (t ha -1 )<br />
Canning 7 2.80 - 4.69<br />
Bidhan 2 2.79- 4.35<br />
Grain yield (t ha -1 )<br />
Chandkhali Nikarighata <strong>CSSRI</strong> Nimpith Sandeshkhali<br />
Canning-7 3.00 4.05 3.70 3.52 3.96<br />
Bidhan-2 4.76 4.64 3.94 3.<strong>11</strong> 3.44<br />
Lalat 1.78 4.29 3.70 3.23 3.17<br />
Superminiket 3.33 3.82 3.47 3.17 3.08<br />
Sankar saru 2.85 4.00 3.24 3.82 3.12<br />
Annada 4.85 4.35 3.93 3.56 3.33<br />
Rashi 3.89 4.05 4.16 3.35 3.41<br />
Boby - 4.10 3.70 - 3.21<br />
Lalminikit 2.94 - - - 3.26<br />
104
<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
Reclamation and management of coastal saline soils<br />
Participatory Varietal Selection (PVS) trials in<br />
kharif (wet) season<br />
During Kharif season, five Mother trials<br />
including one on-station and four on-farm at<br />
villages of Chandkhali, Korakati, Nikarighata of<br />
South 24 Parganas district and Sandeshkhali of<br />
North 24 Parganas district of West Bengal in the<br />
salt affected coastal region of Sundarbans were<br />
conducted under this project. Rice varieties/<br />
lines viz;Sabita, SR 26 B, Amal Mana, Geetanjali,<br />
CN 1039-9, CN 1233-33-9, CSRC (S) 21-2-5-B-1-1,<br />
Manasarobar, NC 678 and CSRC (D) 7-0-4 were<br />
included in the trials. Preferential Analysis (PA)<br />
was conducted for the Mother trials during wet<br />
season. Amal Mana and Geetanjali emerged as<br />
2 most preferred rice varieties. These varieties<br />
were preferred most by the farmers due to their<br />
traits like tolerance to salinity, tall plant type,<br />
more tillers, suitable for both medium and low<br />
land condition, long and compact panicles with<br />
more grains, no/minimum infestation of pest<br />
and diseases, good grain types, enough straw<br />
for fodder/thatching/fuel, optimum maturity<br />
period, expected high yield, etc. CN 1233-33-9<br />
and CN 1039-9 emerged as least preferred<br />
variety in the Preferential Analysis. Farmers did<br />
not prefer these 2 varieties because of traits like<br />
short plant height, non-suitability for low lying<br />
areas, less number of tillers, short panicle length,<br />
and expected lower yields. The results revealed<br />
that the highest grain yield of 5.20 and 4.89 t ha -1<br />
were produced by Geetanjali and Amal Mana,<br />
respectively, while the lowest yield of 2.33 t ha -1<br />
was produced by NC 678 (Table 78).<br />
Forty five trials (Baby trials) were conducted by<br />
farmers in wet season in the salt affected coastal<br />
villages of Chandkhali, Andharia, Dumki,<br />
Nikarighata, Korakati and Sandeshkhali.<br />
For baby trials, each farmer was given 3 elite<br />
varieties/lines of rice, which emerged as the<br />
most preferred varieties from the Mother trials<br />
conducted in the previous year. The varieties/<br />
lines, which were included in the baby trials<br />
were SR 26 B, Geetanjali and Amal Mana.<br />
Baby trial conducted at village Chandkhali during<br />
kharif season<br />
Table 78 : Grain yield of rice entries/varieties in Mother trials<br />
Variety<br />
Grain yield (t ha -1 )<br />
Korakati Sandeshkhali Chandkhali Canning farm<br />
Sabita 4.29 4.50 3.43 3.70<br />
SR 26B 4.14 4.63 4.24 3.23<br />
Manasarabor 4.29 4.00 4.40 3.91<br />
Amal Mana 4.89 4.33 4.50 3.68<br />
CSRC (S) 21-2-5-B-1-5 3.83 4.28 4.27 3.43<br />
CSRC (D) 7-0-4 4.00 3.43 4.33 3.83<br />
CN 1039-9 3.86 3.88 3.73 3.23<br />
CN 12133-3-9 3.71 3.50 3.93 3.15<br />
NC 678 3.86 4.25 2.33 3.53<br />
Geetanjali 5.20 4.80 4.41 3.92<br />
105
Reclamation and management of coastal saline soils <strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
Sensory evaluation<br />
Sensory evaluation was conducted in<br />
participatory mode to analyze the cooking and<br />
eating quality of the top preferred varieties<br />
selected from the preference analysis tested<br />
under researcher-managed trial in rabi/summer<br />
season (2009-10). Farmers’ most preferred<br />
varieties/line Bidhan 2, Boby and Annada<br />
were included for sensory analysis. Farmers<br />
ranked the rice varieties based on the cooking<br />
and eating quality like aroma, colour, flavour,<br />
glossiness, tenderness, cohesiveness, taste,<br />
etc. The farmer’s most preferred rice variety/<br />
line was Boby followed by Bidhan 2 and least<br />
preferred one was Annada. Softness, white color,<br />
pleasant flavour, shiningness, non-cohesiveness<br />
were the major reasons of the farmers to prefer<br />
Boby as best cooked rice.<br />
Under farmers’ selection in participatory<br />
mode, varieties Gitanjali and Amal Mana in<br />
kharif and Bidhan 2 and Canning 7 in rabi<br />
were the best rice varieties under salt stress<br />
condition of coastal region.<br />
Strategies for Sustainable Management<br />
of Degraded Coastal Land and Water for<br />
Enhancing Livelihood Security of Farming<br />
Communities (B.K. Bandyopadhyay, D.<br />
Burman, A.R. Bal, S.K. Sarangi, S. Mandal, K. K.<br />
Mahanta and S.K. Gupta)<br />
The coastal region of the Country is traditionally<br />
disadvantaged and backward with low<br />
livelihood security of the farmers. The region<br />
is vulnerable to degradation due to climate<br />
changes. The degraded soil and water quality,<br />
together with climatic adversities contribute to<br />
the poor livelihood security and low agricultural<br />
productivity. The project was implemented<br />
in a Public-Private consortia mode involving<br />
5 reputed institutions viz;<strong>CSSRI</strong>, Regional<br />
<strong>Research</strong> Station, Canning Town (Lead Center),<br />
Ramkrishna Ashram Krishi Vigyan Kendra<br />
(RAKVK), Nimpith (NGO), <strong>Central</strong> Institute of<br />
Brackishwater Aquaculture, Kakdwip <strong>Research</strong><br />
Centre, Kakdwip, <strong>Central</strong> Agricultural <strong>Research</strong><br />
Institute, Port Blair and Bidhan Chandra Krishi<br />
Viswavidyalaya, Mohanpur.<br />
The operational area of the project were<br />
disadvantageous areas of Sundarbans (South<br />
24 Parganas and North 24 Parganas districts<br />
of West Bengal) and Tsunami affected areas<br />
of Andaman and Nicobor Islands (South<br />
Andaman and North and Middle Andaman<br />
districts). The project sites comprised of 10<br />
clusters spread over 29 villages and covering<br />
<strong>11</strong>629 farm households. The baseline survey<br />
results of the project sites indicated that<br />
clusters in Sundarbans area are dominated by<br />
backward population (particularly SC 18-84%).<br />
In A and N Island, the population was mainly<br />
dominated by the OBCs category. Agricultural<br />
operational lands in Sundarbans of West Bengal<br />
is highly fragmented and the average holding<br />
size of farmers was in the range of 0.19 – 0.56 ha,<br />
dominated by marginal farmers (> 90 %) and<br />
land with low lying conditions (> 80%).<br />
Various technological interventions of<br />
agriculture, animal husbandry and integrated<br />
farming systems were implemented on farmers’<br />
fields in 10 clusters of the project areas. Land<br />
shaping was highly acceptable to the farmers of<br />
the area. The different land shaping techniques<br />
viz; farm pond, deep furrow & high ridge,<br />
Shallow furrow & medium ridge and paddycum-fish<br />
culture was created on an area of<br />
29.215 ha during the year, which created 123830<br />
m 3 of irrigation resource (through rain water<br />
harvesting), converted the area from monocropped<br />
to multi-cropped with integrated crop<br />
and fish cultivation and created employment<br />
for 13150 number of person. New crops and<br />
improved crop varieties were introduced in 120.6<br />
Deep furrow and high ridge: a land shaping<br />
technique implemented at farmers’ field<br />
106
<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
Reclamation and management of coastal saline soils<br />
ha area. About 2400 farmers including women<br />
farmers were trained on various aspects of<br />
agriculture, fisheries and livestock management<br />
and other livelihood improvement options.<br />
Sustainability funds have been created at all the<br />
cluster levels to ensure continued technological<br />
upgrading and hand holding of the beneficiary<br />
farmers and also attempting horizontal spread<br />
of the technological interventions.<br />
Estimating Marketing Efficiency of Major<br />
Horticultural Commodities in Coastal Districts<br />
of West Bengal (Subhasis Mandal, S.K. Sarangi,<br />
D. Burman and B.K. Bandyopadhyay)<br />
ICAR in collaboration with NCAP and several<br />
research institutes and SAUs of the Country<br />
have undertaken this network project including<br />
<strong>CSSRI</strong>, RRS, Canning Town, as one of the<br />
partners for studies in coastal districts of West<br />
Bengal.<br />
Constraint analysis in marketing of produce<br />
by farmers as well as middlemen was under<br />
taken through computing Garrett ranking of<br />
various constraints. Detailed discussions were<br />
held with the farmers and list of important<br />
constraints was prepared. Individually, farmers<br />
were asked to rank these constraints. Based on<br />
this rank, finally, Garrett rank was computed to<br />
prioritize the constraints faced by the farmers.<br />
Same procedure was followed for identification<br />
and prioritization of constraints in marketing of<br />
agricultural produce, faced by middleman also.<br />
The constraints analysis indicated that high<br />
cost of production (due to escalation of input<br />
cost) is the most important constraint faced by<br />
the farmers to enhance their production and<br />
in turn the marketable surplus of the produce.<br />
Poor transportation facilities, occasional market<br />
glut situation during peak season, lack of<br />
remunerative price (very often) and intra-day<br />
price variation (price uncertainty) were the other<br />
most important constraints faced by the farmers<br />
in marketing of their produce. Establishing<br />
better market linkages between farmers would<br />
promote marketing margins substantially. Due<br />
to these constraints most of the production area<br />
is skewed to 5-6 km radius of the market yard<br />
only, even though the favourable conditions for<br />
growing these commodities prevail in other areas<br />
also. Other important constraints encountered<br />
by the farmers are lack of knowledge of grading<br />
and sorting, presence of exploitative middlemen,<br />
delay in payment, scarcity of labour, difficulty<br />
in selling produce with relatively lower quality,<br />
lack of adequate cold storage facilities, lack of<br />
technical know-how and lack of awareness<br />
on crop insurance. Large investments from<br />
corporate houses on value addition to the<br />
agricultural produce are still awaited in the<br />
state, which would probably be beneficial for<br />
both producers and consumers.<br />
Growing fruits and vegetables in the study area<br />
is gradually gaining its popularity. To promote<br />
this, there is a need to free and fair functioning of<br />
all market functionaries. Efficiency of marketing<br />
of selected commodities can be increased<br />
significantly with certain intervention such as<br />
1) up-scaling of volume of produce handled,<br />
either through increase in production or through<br />
formation of self-help groups or formation of<br />
grower’s association so that farmers’ marketing<br />
cost reduces. 2) Providing market intelligence<br />
support to the farmers particularly on the time<br />
to grow certain crops and making availability<br />
of suitable seed/variety for crops. 3) Basic<br />
infrastructure in the market yard should be<br />
improved so that interaction between farmers<br />
and traders can be freely made. 4) Government<br />
regulation should be enforced for free and<br />
fair marketing practices and free entry of a<br />
number of organized retailers in the market.<br />
Implementation of Agricultural Produce and<br />
Marketing Act (APMC Act) would be one of<br />
the options for better, free and fair marketing<br />
practices provided organized retailers are<br />
Training of farm women on mushroom cultivation<br />
107
Reclamation and management of coastal saline soils <strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
allowed to purchase produce directly from<br />
farmers across the districts. 5) Appropriate price<br />
discovery of the produce in the market was the<br />
most important issue to facilitate improved<br />
marketing efficiency and providing farmers<br />
a better deal. Finally, based on the discussion<br />
with various market functionaries, it has been<br />
concluded that to make a marketing model<br />
successful, it must ensure the three components<br />
like offering best price, providing insurance<br />
cover and making availability of technical<br />
know-how.<br />
Enhancing and Stabilizing the Productivity of<br />
Salt Affected Areas by Incorporating Genes for<br />
tolerance of Abiotic Stress in Rice: BMZ Project<br />
(B.K. Bandyopadhyay, D.Burman, A.R.Bal, S.K.<br />
Sarangi and Subhasis Mandal)<br />
In this project, rice varieties incorporated with<br />
salt tolerant gene ‘saltol’ are being evaluated.<br />
Thirty six entries of rice (BMZ 1, BMZ 2, BMZ<br />
3, BMZ 4, BMZ 5, BMZ 6, BMZ 7, BMZ 8, BMZ<br />
9, BMZ 10, BMZ <strong>11</strong>, BMZ 12, BMZ 13, BMZ 14,<br />
BMZ 15, BMZ 16, BMZ 17, BMZ 18, BMZ 19,<br />
BMZ 20, BMZ 21, BMZ 22, BMZ 23, BMZ 24,<br />
BMZ 25, BMZ 26, BMZ 27, BMZ 28, BMZ 29,<br />
BMZ 30, BMZ 31, VSR 156, CSR 27, CSR 36, IR<br />
29, FL 478, Canning 7 & CST 7-1) besides two<br />
checks from RRS, Canning (Canning 7 and<br />
CST 7-1) were put under trial in two different<br />
salinity conditions one at low salinity (ECe 1.7<br />
dS m -1 ) and other at high salinity (ECe 6.7 dS<br />
m -1 ) during rabi season.<br />
The lines BMZ 7, BMZ 8 and BMZ 19 did not<br />
germinate in the nursery. Though, the line BMZ<br />
12 germinated in the nursery but the flowering<br />
was very late. However, the lines BMZ-1,<br />
BMZ-2, BMZ-3, BMZ-4, BMZ-5, BMZ-6, BMZ 9,<br />
BMZ-<strong>11</strong>, BMZ-12, BMZ-16, BMZ-25 and BMZ-<br />
26 died at vegetative stage under high salinity<br />
condition. The highest grain yield was recorded<br />
from BMZ 2, BMZ 21, BMZ 23, CSR 36, BMZ<br />
28, BMZ 29, FL-478 under low salinity (ECe 1.7<br />
dS m -1 ) condition and the lines BMZ-23, BMZ-<br />
28, BMZ-29, BMZ-31 and Canning 7 performed<br />
better in terms of grain yield under high salinity<br />
condition (ECe 6.7 dS m -1 ).<br />
During kharif <strong>2010</strong>, thirty five entries (BMZ-1,<br />
BMZ-2, BMZ-3, BMZ-4, BMZ-5, BMZ-6, BMZ-9,<br />
BMZ-10, BMZ-<strong>11</strong>, BMZ-12, BMZ-13, BMZ-14,<br />
BMZ-15, BMZ-16, BMZ-17, BMZ-18, BMZ-20,<br />
BMZ-21, BMZ-22, BMZ-23, BMZ-24, BMZ-25,<br />
BMZ-26, BMZ-27, BMZ-28, BMZ-29, BMZ-30,<br />
BMZ-31, VSR-156, CSR-36, CSR-27, CSR-29, FL<br />
478, Canning-7 and CST 7-1) were put under trial<br />
with soil salinity (ECe) of 4.80 dS m -1 . Highest<br />
yield was obtained from BMZ 4 followed by<br />
BMZ 16 and BMZ 28.<br />
<br />
108
<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
AICRP on Management of Salt Affected <strong>Soil</strong>s and Use of Saline<br />
Water in Agriculture<br />
Organic Input Management Options with<br />
Saline Water Irrigation for Sustaining<br />
Productivity of High Value Crops (R.L. Meena<br />
and S.K. Gupta)<br />
Increasing shortage of good quality irrigation<br />
water in arid and semi arid regions of the<br />
country is forcing the farmers to utilize saline<br />
and alkali ground water for irrigation. In order to<br />
ensure their sustainable use in combination with<br />
organic inputs management, a field experiment<br />
was initiated during kharif 2008 at Bir Forest<br />
Experimental Farm, Hisar. Experiment was laid<br />
out in split plot design with two saline water<br />
irrigation (EC iw<br />
7) in main plots and 8<br />
organic input management options in sub-plots.<br />
During kharif 2009, sesame was sown on 14 th July<br />
and harvested on 22 nd October, 2009 and during<br />
rabi 2009 spice crop fennel variety Hisar Swarup<br />
(HF-33) was sown on 31 st October, 2009 and<br />
harvested in four picking upto 13 th May, <strong>2010</strong>.<br />
Initial soil sample from 0-30 cm depth revealed<br />
that EC e<br />
, pH s<br />
, organic carbon and available<br />
nitrogen before the start of the experiment were<br />
0.80-0.86, 8.2-8.5, 0.26 per cent and 98 kg ha -1 ,<br />
respectively.<br />
In sesame, plant height, plants/m, row length,<br />
number of pods per plant differed significantly<br />
with saline water irrigation, while 100 seed weight<br />
and seed yield reduced under high saline water<br />
irrigation. Significant difference in plants/m<br />
row length, number of pods per plant and seed<br />
yield of sesame was observed with organic input<br />
applications as compared to inorganic fertilizer<br />
applications. Highest seed yield (0.28 t ha -1 )<br />
was observed under 100 per cent recommended<br />
doses of organic inputs viz;farm yard manure<br />
+ neem cake manure (Table 79). No significant<br />
difference was observed under inorganic and<br />
organic inputs on pH, EC e<br />
and available nitrogen<br />
and phosphorus, while significantly high organic<br />
carbon (0.36%) was observed with application of<br />
100 per cent recommended doses of all three<br />
Table 79 : Growth, yield attributes and yield of sesame<br />
Treatments<br />
Plant height<br />
(cm)<br />
Plants/m row<br />
length<br />
No. of<br />
pods per<br />
plant<br />
100 seed<br />
weight<br />
(g)<br />
Seed yield<br />
(t ha -1 )<br />
ECiw 7 62.3 3.5 28.5 0.31 0.09<br />
CD (5%) 33.1 1.2 5.9 NS NS<br />
T 1<br />
72.3 3.5 27.2 0.32 0.<strong>11</strong><br />
T 2<br />
83.3 4.3 35.8 0.31 0.15<br />
T 3<br />
101.8 4.7 43.5 0.32 0.18<br />
T 4<br />
83.3 5.0 48.2 0.31 0.17<br />
T 5<br />
88.5 6.2 44.8 0.31 0.16<br />
T 6<br />
89.8 5.3 45.8 0.32 0.21<br />
T 7<br />
94.3 5.7 47.7 0.32 0.28<br />
T 8<br />
90.2 6.7 51.7 0.32 0.25<br />
CD (5%) NS 1.6 13.3 NS 0.01<br />
T 1<br />
-100% Inorganic fertilizer; T 2<br />
- Inorganic + Organic Inputs (50% each); T 3<br />
: FYM + Vermicompost (50:50); T 4<br />
- FYM<br />
+ Non-edible oilcake manure (50:50); T 5<br />
- FYM + Vermicompost+Non-edible neem cake manure (33% each); T 6<br />
-<br />
FYM+Vermicompost (100:100); T 7<br />
- FYM+Non edible neem cake manure (100:100); T 8<br />
- FYM+Vermicompost+Non edible<br />
neem cake manure (66.6% each).<br />
109
AICRP on management of salt affected soils and use of saline water in agriculture<br />
<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
Sesame (a) and Fennel (b) crops under saline water irrigation<br />
organic inputs viz., farm yard manure +<br />
vermicompost + non-edible neem cake manure<br />
(Gronim) (Table 80). Non significant differences<br />
were recorded in umbels per plant, umbellets per<br />
umbel, seed weight per umbel and 100 seed weight<br />
in saline water irrigation while plant height differ<br />
significantly under high salinity irrigation water.<br />
Significant difference in plant height of fennel<br />
was observed with organic input applications.<br />
Highest seed yield (1.21 t ha -1 ) was observed<br />
under 50 per cent recommended doses of organic<br />
inputs viz., farm yard manure + vermicompost<br />
(Table 81). <strong>Soil</strong> analysis at harvest of fennel<br />
showed that there was significant difference in<br />
EC e<br />
and available phosphorus with saline water<br />
irrigation while other parameters were observed<br />
at par. Application of organic inputs showed no<br />
significant difference in EC e<br />
, pH s<br />
and available<br />
nitrogen except organic carbon and available<br />
Sesame responded well to 100 per cent<br />
application of FYM and neem cake manure<br />
and fennel responded well to application of<br />
FYM and vermi compost. These crops could<br />
be cultivated upto 7 dS m -1<br />
Table 80 : <strong>Soil</strong> pH s<br />
, EC e<br />
, OC, available N and P<br />
(0-30 cm) at harvest of sesame<br />
Treatments<br />
EC e<br />
(dS<br />
m -1 )<br />
pH s<br />
OC<br />
(%)<br />
Av.N<br />
(kg ha -1 )<br />
Av. P<br />
(kg ha -1 )<br />
ECiw 7 1.5 8.4 0.26 81.7 27.7<br />
CD (5%) 0.36 NS NS NS NS<br />
T 1<br />
1.1 8.3 0.21 79.4 22.4<br />
T 2<br />
1.4 8.3 0.25 83.3 29.9<br />
T 3<br />
1.1 8.4 0.24 80.7 19.2<br />
T 4<br />
1.2 8.4 0.26 82.0 28.7<br />
T 5<br />
1.6 8.4 0.25 80.3 19.8<br />
T 6<br />
1.5 8.4 0.29 83.0 34.9<br />
T 7<br />
1.5 8.5 0.27 84.3 18.9<br />
T 8<br />
1.2 8.4 0.36 87.8 46.8<br />
CD (5%) NS NS 0.07 NS NS<br />
Table 81 : Growth, yield attributes and yields of fennel under different treatments<br />
Treatments Plant height<br />
(cm)<br />
Umbels<br />
per plant<br />
Umbellets<br />
per umbel<br />
Seed wt.<br />
per umbel<br />
(g)<br />
100 seed<br />
weight<br />
(g)<br />
Seed yield<br />
(t ha -1 )<br />
EC iw<br />
7 98.5 18.6 18.5 1.6 0.62 0.85<br />
CD (5%) 22.8 NS NS NS NS 0.41<br />
T 1<br />
100.0 21.1 18.0 1.3 0.53 0.97<br />
T 2<br />
100.6 16.8 18.5 1.4 0.56 1.01<br />
T 3<br />
<strong>11</strong>0.4 19.6 18.2 1.6 0.62 1.21<br />
T 4<br />
106.1 19.7 18.2 1.5 0.63 1.<strong>11</strong><br />
T 5<br />
105.0 19.8 20.5 1.5 0.60 1.17<br />
T 6<br />
<strong>11</strong>4.0 22.5 21.6 1.8 0.57 0.88<br />
T 7<br />
<strong>11</strong>9.0 20.0 21.0 1.7 0.56 1.05<br />
T 8<br />
122.7 21.6 21.5 1.7 0.60 1.03<br />
CD (5%) 14.3 NS NS NS NS NS<br />
<strong>11</strong>0
<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
AICRP on management of salt affected soils and use of saline water in agriculture<br />
phosphorus. The highest organic carbon content<br />
was observed with all three organic inputs.<br />
Assessment of Treated Sewage Water Quality<br />
and its Effect on Yield of Different Crops at<br />
Farmers’ Fields (Agra Centre)<br />
Treated sewage water was assessed during 2009-<br />
10 at different locations of STP Dandhupura,<br />
district Agra which is being used for irrigating<br />
different vegetables, cereals and pulses. The<br />
sewage water samples of Agra city were collected<br />
at sewage station without primary treatment<br />
(Inlet) before rains, after rains and during winter<br />
season and analysed for different parameters<br />
(Table 82). Concentration of bi-carbonate was<br />
higher before rains while chloride increased after<br />
the rainy season.<br />
The analysis of treated sewage samples at STP<br />
ponds revealed that salinity ranged from 3.4 to<br />
3.7, pH ranged from 7.2 to 7.5, BOD ranged from<br />
30 to 32 mg L -1 . The outlet water had carbonate<br />
after rains while bicarbonate was higher before<br />
rains. Chloride ranged from 69 to 471 mg L -1 .<br />
Nitrate was found in all samples and ranged<br />
from 287 to 340 mg L -1 . The concentration of<br />
other parameters decreased after treatment.<br />
Treated sewage water samples were also collected<br />
at a distance of 1 km from STP and analysis<br />
showed that water have high EC ranging from<br />
3.3 to 4.1, BOD from 14 to 30 mg L -1 , Chloride<br />
content was higher during winter season. Lower<br />
concentration of other parameters were observed<br />
at a distance of one km from the sewage treatment<br />
plant.<br />
Treated sewage water irrigated crops were<br />
compared with fresh ground water (Table 83).<br />
The yield of mustard, wheat and pearl millet<br />
increased by <strong>11</strong>-13 per cent; vegetables by 10-14<br />
per cent. However, yield of other crops increased<br />
by 10-14 per cent due to high organic carbon and<br />
available nitrogen of treated sewage water.<br />
Application of treated sewage water irrigation<br />
increased the yield of mustard, wheat and<br />
pearmillet crops, which is due to increased<br />
organic carbon and available nitrogen of<br />
treated sewage water<br />
Tolerance of Cotton Varieties to Saline Water<br />
under Drip Irrigation System (Bikaner Centre)<br />
In non command areas, tube well is the only<br />
source of irrigation. Groundwater being mostly<br />
saline, productivity is decreasing day by day due<br />
to increasing soil salinity. Cotton is an alternative<br />
crop which can be successfully grown with poor<br />
quality water. Since drip irrigation has added<br />
advantage of using relatively more saline water,<br />
therefore, there is a need to identify suitable<br />
varieties of cotton and optimum irrigation<br />
scheduls under drip irrigation.<br />
It is evident from Table 84 that methods of<br />
irrigation, salinity of irrigation water and varieties<br />
had significant effect on seed cotton yield. Drip<br />
method was found significantly superior to flood<br />
method, seed cotton yield being 44.2 per cent higher<br />
in drip irrigation as compared to flood irrigation.<br />
Seed cotton yield decreased significantly at EC iw<br />
6.0 dS m -1 as compared to canal and saline water<br />
having EC iw<br />
3.0 dS m -1 . However, differences in<br />
seed cotton yield with canal water and saline<br />
water of EC iw<br />
3.0 dS m -1 were not significant.<br />
The variety Bt cotton was found significantly<br />
superior than other varieties. Effect of methods of<br />
irrigation, salinity of irrigation water and varieties<br />
on yield attributes were also found significant.<br />
Plant height, number of bolls/plant and boll<br />
size were significantly higher in drip irrigation<br />
Use of treated sewage water for irrigation in different<br />
crops<br />
Cotton under drip irrigation with saline water<br />
<strong>11</strong>1
AICRP on management of salt affected soils and use of saline water in agriculture<br />
<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
Table 82 : Sewage water analysis at Dhadhupura STP inlet, outlet and 1 km away from STP<br />
Parameter<br />
After<br />
rains<br />
Before treatment After treatment At 1 Km distance from STP<br />
Winter<br />
season<br />
Before<br />
rains<br />
After<br />
rains<br />
Winter<br />
season<br />
Before<br />
rains<br />
After<br />
rains<br />
Winter<br />
season<br />
Before<br />
rains<br />
pH 7.7 6.9 7.4 7.3 7.2 7.5 7.6 7.7 7.2<br />
EC (dS m -1 ) 3.4 3.6 4.7 3.4 3.6 3.7 3.3 4.1 3.7<br />
BOD (mg L -1 ) 204 221 221 30 32 30 15 14 30<br />
COD (mg L -1 ) 483 516 509 <strong>11</strong>8 129 126 58 91 63<br />
CO 3<br />
(mg L -1 ) 30 - - 51 - - 36 45 17<br />
HCO 3<br />
(mg L -1 ) 702 723 995 570 665 702 506 580 467<br />
Chloride (mg L -1 ) 516 60 83 471 208 69 496 189 69<br />
Sulfate (mg L -1 ) 289 792 1456 480 900 <strong>11</strong>42 444 <strong>11</strong>93 1277<br />
Nitrate (mg L -1 ) 405 341 326 340 284 287 206 181 233<br />
Ca (mg L -1 ) 97 92 <strong>11</strong>2 65 82 80 38 46 93<br />
Mg (mg L -1 ) 77 96 100 104 75 98 <strong>11</strong>4 96 92<br />
Na (mg L -1 ) 478 438 457 479 447 432 479 372 322<br />
K (mg L -1 ) 39 36 37 38 36 37 42 35 30<br />
Cu (mg L -1 ) 0.09 0.08 0.04 0.02 0.03 0.02 - - -<br />
Mn (mg L -1 ) 89.7 82.2 104.9 87.9 90.7 97.1 - - -<br />
Zn (mg L -1 ) 0.07 0.07 0.09 0.02 0.02 0.03 - - -<br />
Co (mg L -1 ) 0.01 0.01 0.07 0.02 0.03 0.03 - - -<br />
Fe (mg L -1 ) 0.07 0.04 0.06 0.01 - 0.01 - - -<br />
SAR (mmol L -1 ) ½ 8.8 7.7 7.6 8.5 8.6 7.6 8.7 7.2 6.2<br />
RSC (me L -1 ) 1.3 0.5 2.2 - - - - - -<br />
Table 83 : Effect of treated sewage and fresh ground water irrigation on yield of different crops at farmers<br />
field<br />
Crops<br />
Treated sewage water<br />
irrigated crops yield<br />
(t ha -1 )<br />
Fresh ground water irrigated<br />
crops yield<br />
(t ha -1 )<br />
Yield increase in treated<br />
sewage water irrigation<br />
(%)<br />
Mustard 2.80 2.50 <strong>11</strong><br />
Wheat 4.20 3.80 10<br />
Pearl millet 2.90 2.50 13<br />
Cauliflower 6-10 (mid), 22-25 (late) 4-9 (mid), 16-22 (late) 10 (mid), 12 (late)<br />
Cabbage 7-8 5-7 13<br />
Carrot 22-28 20-24 14<br />
Cowpea 5-8 (green pod), 1-1.5 (grain) 4-7 (green pod), 0.9-1.3 (grain) 13 (green pod), 13 (grain)<br />
Knol-khol 20-25 18-22 12<br />
Onion 24-28 22-24 14<br />
Palak 6-10 4-9 10<br />
Radish 5-7 3-5 14<br />
Spinach 6-8 3-7 13<br />
<strong>11</strong>2
<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
AICRP on management of salt affected soils and use of saline water in agriculture<br />
Table 84 : Seed cotton yield of different varieties under different methods of irrigation and salinity of<br />
irrigation water<br />
Treatments<br />
Seed cotton yield<br />
(t ha -1 )<br />
Plant height<br />
(cm)<br />
No. of bolls/<br />
plant<br />
Boll size<br />
(cm)<br />
2009 <strong>2010</strong> 2009 <strong>2010</strong> 2009 <strong>2010</strong> 2009 <strong>2010</strong><br />
Methods of irrigation<br />
M 1<br />
-Drip 1.86 2.78 149.5 120.1 50.3 67 4.15 3.98<br />
M 2<br />
-flood 1.29 1.97 107.0 106.8 44.0 58 3.87 3.77<br />
CD (5%) 0.10 0.16 6.2 5.5 2.5 2.9 0.14 0.17<br />
<strong>Salinity</strong> of water<br />
S 1<br />
- 0.25 dS m -1 1.78 3.05 135.5 128.6 54.0 83 4.26 4.30<br />
S 2<br />
- 3.0 dS m -1 1.69 2.35 129.4 <strong>11</strong>7.3 48.0 67 4.<strong>11</strong> 4.15<br />
S 3<br />
- 6.0 dS m -1 1.27 1.73 120.1 94.6 39.0 37 3.66 3.68<br />
CD (5%) 0.12 0.13 7.6 6.8 3.0 3.5 0.17 0.20<br />
Varieties<br />
V 1<br />
- F 846 1.35 1.81 124.3 <strong>11</strong>0.7 46.1 55 4.07 4.<strong>11</strong><br />
V 2<br />
- RST-9 1.46 2.47 133.6 <strong>11</strong>4.3 49.5 64 4.23 4.25<br />
V 3<br />
-RG-8 1.35 2.21 120.2 107.5 41.7 61 3.45 3.47<br />
V 4<br />
- Bt cotton 2.15 3.02 135.3 121.4 51.2 68 4.28 4.30<br />
CD (5%) 0.13 0.19 8.8 7.8 3.5 4.1 0.20 0.26<br />
C.V % 12.7 <strong>11</strong>.8 10.3 10.3 <strong>11</strong>.1 9.7 7.4 7.9<br />
as compared to flood irrigation. Yield attributes<br />
decreased significantly at EC iw<br />
6.0 dS m -1 salinity<br />
of irrigation water as compared to canal water<br />
and saline water having EC iw<br />
3.0 dS m -1 .<br />
Cotton could successfully be grown with<br />
saline water of 3.0 dS m -1 using drip method<br />
of irrigation as compared to flood irrigation<br />
Effect of Amendments and FYM on Vegetables<br />
Irrigated with High RSC Water (Hisar Centre)<br />
Cluster bean<br />
The yield of cluster bean irrigated with sodic<br />
water (RSC=<strong>11</strong>.6 me L -1 ) increased significantly<br />
both with the addition of gypsum and FYM. In<br />
cluster bean, the highest yield of 9.13 t ha -1 was<br />
obtained in F 2<br />
G 2<br />
treatment while the lowest (0.45<br />
t ha -1 ) was in F 0<br />
G 0<br />
treatment (Table 85).<br />
Broccoli<br />
In broccoli, yield increased significantly with the<br />
addition of gypsum and FYM. The highest yield<br />
of 10.7 t ha -1 was recorded in F 2<br />
G 2<br />
treatment and<br />
the lowest (0.33 t ha -1 ) in F 0<br />
G 0<br />
(Table 86).<br />
Okra<br />
The yield of okra irrigated with sodic water<br />
(RSC=<strong>11</strong>.5 me L -1 ) increased significantly with<br />
Table 85 : Effect of FYM and gypsum on yield of<br />
cluster bean (t ha -1 ) under sodic water<br />
irrigation<br />
FYM<br />
G 0<br />
(No gypsum)<br />
Gypsum (% GR)<br />
G 1<br />
(50%)<br />
G 2<br />
(100%)<br />
Mean<br />
F 0<br />
(No FYM) 0.45 4.83 6.06 3.78<br />
F 1<br />
(10 t ha -1 ) 0.73 6.18 8.22 5.05<br />
F 2<br />
(20 t ha -1 ) 0.82 6.96 9.13 5.64<br />
Mean 0.67 5.99 7.80 -<br />
CD (5%) Gypsum = 0.38; FYM = 0.38; G X FYM = 0.65<br />
Table 86 : Effect of FYM and gypsum on yield<br />
of broccoli (t ha -1 ) under sodic water<br />
irrigation<br />
FYM<br />
G 0<br />
(No gypsum)<br />
Gypsum (% GR)<br />
G 1<br />
(50%)<br />
G 2<br />
(100%)<br />
Mean<br />
F 0<br />
(No FYM) 0.33 4.32 5.55 3.40<br />
F 1<br />
(10 t ha -1 ) 1.51 6.25 8.96 5.57<br />
F 2<br />
(20 t ha -1 ) 2.06 9.87 10.70 7.55<br />
Mean 1.30 6.81 8.40 -<br />
CD (5%) Gypsum = 0.28; FYM = 0.28; G x FYM = 0.48<br />
<strong>11</strong>3
AICRP on management of salt affected soils and use of saline water in agriculture<br />
<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
the addition of both gypsum and FYM. However,<br />
the magnitude of increase was higher with<br />
gypsum than FYM. Maximum yield (9.52 t ha -1 )<br />
of okra was obtained in F 2<br />
G 4<br />
treatment. The<br />
yield increased by 18 and 22 percent with F 1<br />
and F 2<br />
as compared to F 0<br />
(Table 87). The mean<br />
yield increased significantly with the addition<br />
of gypsum and it was 2 times higher in G 4<br />
as<br />
compared to G 0<br />
.<br />
Cabbage<br />
The curd weight of cabbage also increased<br />
significantly with the application of gypsum and<br />
FYM (Table 88). The mean yield increased from<br />
17.53 t ha -1 under no gypsum to 25.95 t ha -1 under<br />
100 per cent GR. Maximum yield (27.43 t ha -1 )<br />
was obtained in F 2<br />
G 4<br />
treatment.<br />
It is concluded that the synergy of amendments<br />
and FYM should be exploited to get high yield<br />
of vegetable crops under sodic water irrigation.<br />
Influence of Spent Wash and Spent Wash<br />
Vermi-compost on Reclamation of Sodic <strong>Soil</strong>s<br />
(Indore Centre)<br />
An experiment was conducted at <strong>Salinity</strong> <strong>Research</strong><br />
Station, Barwaha with paddy (var. Kranti)-wheat<br />
(GW-173) cropping sequence. The soil of the<br />
experimental field was sodic Vertisols (Table 89).<br />
Spent wash and spent wash vermicompost was<br />
procured from nearby distillery. Characteristics<br />
Table 87 : Effect of FYM and gypsum on the yield of okra (t ha -1 ) under sodic water<br />
FYM<br />
Gypsum (% GR)<br />
G 0<br />
(No gypsum) G 1<br />
(25%) G 2<br />
(50%) G 3<br />
(75%) G 4<br />
(100%) Mean<br />
F 0<br />
(No FYM) 4.63 5.66 5.92 6.43 6.94 5.92<br />
F 1<br />
(10 t ha -1 ) 4.37 6.43 7.20 7.97 9.00 7.00<br />
F 2<br />
(20 t ha -1 ) 3.86 6.69 7.46 8.49 9.52 7.20<br />
Mean 4.29 6.26 6.86 7.63 8.49 -<br />
CD (5%) Gypsum = 0.22; FYM = 0.17; G x FYM = 0.38<br />
Table 88 : Effect of FYM and gypsum on the yield of cabbage (t ha -1 ) under sodic water<br />
FYM<br />
Gypsum (% GR)<br />
G 0<br />
(No gypsum) G 1<br />
(25%) G 2<br />
(50%) G 3<br />
(75%) G 4<br />
(100%) Mean<br />
F 0<br />
(No FYM) 16.54 17.73 20.41 23.34 24.12 20.43<br />
F 1<br />
(10 t ha -1 ) 17.50 18.93 21.22 25.04 26.29 21.80<br />
F 2<br />
(20 t ha -1 ) 18.53 19.84 23.79 26.25 27.43 23.17<br />
Mean 17.53 18.83 21.81 24.88 25.95 -<br />
CD (5%) Gypsum = 0.71; FYM =NS; G x FYM = 1.22;<br />
of spent wash used as soil amendment and<br />
physico-chemical properties of spent wash vermicompost<br />
and FYM are given in Table 90 and 91,<br />
respectively. The experiment was conducted with<br />
9 treatments in RBD with 3 replications in plot<br />
size of 5 x 4 m 2 .<br />
One time application of spent wash and<br />
other treatments were given 30 days prior to<br />
transplanting of paddy seedlings. The crop was<br />
fertilized with 120 : 60 : 40 kg NPK and 25 kg<br />
ZnSO 4<br />
ha -1 . The soil was puddled and 25 days old<br />
seedlings of paddy were transplanted with 20x10<br />
cm spacing. The plots were submerged with 5 cm<br />
water throughout the growing period.<br />
Wheat crop was grown in the same plots after<br />
harvesting of paddy for evaluating the residual<br />
effect of amendments. The wheat crop was<br />
fertilized with 120 kg N, 60 kg P 2<br />
O 5<br />
and 40 kg K 2<br />
O<br />
ha -1 . Five irrigations were given to wheat crop.<br />
<strong>Soil</strong> and plant parameters were analysed at the<br />
harvest of the crop.<br />
Yield and yield attributes of paddy<br />
It is evident from the Table 92 that the application<br />
of amendments in the soil significantly enhanced<br />
the growth and yield of paddy over control. The<br />
plant height of paddy varied significantly with<br />
different amendments. Application of 5.0 cm<br />
spent wash increased the plant height by 15.2<br />
<strong>11</strong>4
<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
AICRP on management of salt affected soils and use of saline water in agriculture<br />
Table 89 : Physico chemical properties of experimental soil<br />
pH s<br />
EC e<br />
(dS m -1 )<br />
Ext. Na<br />
(me 100g -1 )<br />
WS Na<br />
(me 100g -1 )<br />
Exch. Na<br />
(me 100g -1 )<br />
GR<br />
(t ha -1 )<br />
CEC<br />
(c.mol (p+) kg -1<br />
ESP<br />
8.4 1.4 16.7 1.20 5.23 9.00 40.0 38.8<br />
Ext. Na: Extractable sodium; WS Na: Water soluble sodium; Exch. Na: Exchangeable sodium; GR: Gypsum requirement;<br />
CEC: Cation exchange capacity; ESP: Exchangeable sodium percentage<br />
Table 90 : Characteristics of spent wash used as soil amendment<br />
pH s<br />
EC e<br />
(dS m -1 )<br />
mg L -1<br />
Ca Mg Na K N S BOD COD<br />
4.9 9.4 1522 880 380 8675 990 <strong>11</strong>50 4<strong>11</strong>0 20660<br />
Table 91 : Physico-chemical properties of spent wash vermi-compost and FYM used as soil amendments<br />
pH<br />
Organic<br />
s<br />
EC Per cent<br />
e<br />
(1:4) (dS m -1 ) Ca Mg K S<br />
Spent wash vermi-compost 8.5 3.8 0.78 0.38 1.10 0.55<br />
Farm Yard Manure ( FYM) 8.1 1.8 0.45 0.15 0.63 0.20<br />
Table 92 : Effect of amendments on growth, yield and yield attributes of paddy<br />
Treatments<br />
Plant<br />
height<br />
(cm)<br />
per cent over control. Further increase in the<br />
levels of spent wash also increased the plant<br />
height but it was at par with 5.0 cm spent wash<br />
application. Number of tillers and length of<br />
panicle also increased significantly over control<br />
with application of 5.0 cm spent wash and after<br />
that no significant increase in number of tillers<br />
and length of panicle over 5.0 cm spent wash<br />
application was observed. The highest grain<br />
(5.02 t ha -1 ) and straw (5.92 t ha -1 ) yield was<br />
recorded in 10.0 cm spent wash level but it was<br />
statistically at par with 5.0 cm. The application<br />
of 5.0 cm spent wash enhanced the grain and<br />
straw yield of paddy by 39.7and 44.3 per cent,<br />
respectively over control<br />
No. of<br />
effective<br />
tillers/hill<br />
Length of<br />
panicle<br />
(cm)<br />
Yield (t ha -1 )<br />
Grain<br />
Control 80.0 6.5 17.5 3.47 3.95<br />
FYM @ 5 t ha -1 83.3 6.9 18.5 3.58 4.12<br />
Vermi-compost @ 5 t ha -1 84.1 7.0 19.3 3.67 4.23<br />
Gypsum @ 75% GR 86.7 8.9 20.1 4.05 4.70<br />
Gypsum@ 75% GR+FYM @ 5 t ha -1 87.2 9.1 20.0 4.27 4.97<br />
Gypsum @ 75% GR+VC @ 5 t ha -1 87.9 9.4 20.3 4.35 5.05<br />
SW 2.5 cm 88.3 9.9 20.7 4.38 5.13<br />
SW 5.0 cm 92.2 10.5 22.5 4.85 5.70<br />
SW 10.0 cm 93.1 10.6 22.7 5.02 5.92<br />
CD (5%) 3.6 1.1 1.6 0.43 0.53<br />
GR- Gypsum requirement; FYM - Farm yard manure; VC - Vermicompost; SW- Spent wash<br />
Yield attributes and yield of wheat<br />
Straw<br />
It is evident from the data that the plant height<br />
varied significantly with the application of<br />
different amendments (Table 93). Application of<br />
5.0 cm spent wash (SW) increased the plant height<br />
by 38.0 per cent over control. Further increase in<br />
spent wash application increased the plant height<br />
over control but the increase over 5.0 cm spent<br />
wash treatment was statistically non-significant.<br />
The number of effective tillers per plant increased<br />
significantly with the applications of 5.0 cm spent<br />
wash and above over control. Further increase<br />
in the application of spent wash did not have<br />
significant increase in number of effective tillers<br />
over 5.0 cm spent wash. Application of 5.0 cm<br />
spent wash significantly enhanced the length of<br />
<strong>11</strong>5
AICRP on management of salt affected soils and use of saline water in agriculture<br />
<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
Table 93 : Effect of amendments on growth characters and yield of wheat<br />
Treatments<br />
Plant<br />
height (cm)<br />
Effective<br />
tillers/tplant<br />
Length of<br />
ear head (cm)<br />
Yield (t ha -1 )<br />
Grain<br />
Control 47.3 5.27 5.07 2.17 2.29<br />
FYM @ 5 t ha -1 48.7 5.40 5.20 2.27 2.44<br />
Vermicompost @ 5 t ha -1 50.0 5.60 5.40 2.33 2.54<br />
Gypsum @ 75% GR 56.2 6.40 5.53 3.00 3.35<br />
Gypsum@ 75% GR+FYM @ 5 t ha -1 57.6 6.73 5.80 3.40 3.49<br />
Gypsum @ 75% GR+VC @ 5 t ha -1 59.3 6.80 6.00 3.47 3.55<br />
SW 2.5 cm 62.0 6.87 6.60 3.52 3.85<br />
SW 5.0 cm 65.3 7.67 7.20 4.02 4.35<br />
SW 10.0 cm 66.0 7.93 7.33 4.17 4.47<br />
CD (5%) 3.23 0.71 0.49 0.48 0.40<br />
Straw<br />
ear head of wheat by 42 percent over control.<br />
The highest grain (4.17 t ha -1 ) and straw (4.47 t<br />
ha -1 ) yield was observed in 10.0 cm spent wash<br />
but it was at par with 5.0 cm spent wash level.<br />
Application of 5.0 cm spent wash increased the<br />
grain and straw yield by 85.2 and 89.9 per cent,<br />
respectively over control.<br />
Post harvest status of soil<br />
Application of different amendments increased<br />
the organic carbon, available N and K contents<br />
significantly over control, while decreased the<br />
soil EC e<br />
and ESP after harvest of wheat crop<br />
(Table 94). The highest organic carbon content<br />
(0.77 %) was obtained with 10.0 cm spent wash<br />
application but it did not differ significantly with<br />
5.0 cm spent wash (0.73 %). The highest available<br />
N (207.3 kg ha -1 ) and K (447 kg ha -1 ) contents in<br />
the soil were recorded in the treatment receiving<br />
10 cm spent wash but at par with 5 cm spent<br />
wash. Application of amendments decreased<br />
the EC e<br />
and ESP of soil significantly after harvest<br />
of wheat. A reduction in pH s<br />
was also observed<br />
due to application of amendments to soil but<br />
it was non-significant. The lowest EC e<br />
(1.18 dS<br />
m -1 ) and ESP (17.0) were noticed when 10 cm<br />
spent wash was applied, but it did not differ<br />
significantly with 5.0 cm level.<br />
Application of amendments improved the soil<br />
fertility status and therefore, the yield of crops<br />
Table 94 : Effect of amendments on soil properties after wheat harvest<br />
Treatments OC<br />
(%<br />
Available nutrients (kg ha -1 ) pH s<br />
EC e<br />
(dS m -1 )<br />
N P K<br />
Control 0.37 178.0 8.1 328 8.13 1.29 35.4<br />
FYM @ 5 t ha -1 0.46 186.7 9.0 335 8.10 1.28 34.6<br />
Vermicompost @ 5 t ha -1 0.47 188.3 9.2 339 8.10 1.26 34.2<br />
Gypsum @ 75% GR 0.46 185.7 9.3 353 8.10 1.24 24.5<br />
Gypsum @ 75% GR+ FYM 0.52 189.7 9.9 361 8.10 1.22 23.5<br />
@ 5 t ha -1<br />
Gypsum @ 75% GR + 0.54 192.3 9.9 373 8.10 1.22 21.9<br />
Vermicompost @ 5 t ha -1<br />
SW 2.5 cm 0.62 194.0 10.0 383 8.10 1.20 19.7<br />
SW 5.0 cm 0.73 202.7 <strong>11</strong>.7 421 8.10 1.20 17.1<br />
SW 10.0 cm 0.77 207.3 <strong>11</strong>.7 447 8.10 1.18 17.0<br />
CD (5%) 0.05 6.2 NS 35 NS 0.05 1.6<br />
SW- Spent wash<br />
ESP<br />
<strong>11</strong>6
<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
TECHNOLOGY ASSESSED AND TRANSFERRED<br />
Demonstration on Salt Tolerant Varieties of<br />
Rice (R.K. Singh and R.S. Tripathi)<br />
During kharif season, thirty eight demonstrations<br />
were conducted on salt tolerant rice varieties<br />
(CSR 23, CSR 30 and CSR 36) during the year<br />
<strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong> in salt affected soils. The demonstrations<br />
conducted at various locations in Haryana are<br />
presented in Table 95. Varieties CSR 23, CSR 30<br />
and CSR 36 produced an average grain yield of<br />
4.52, 3.13 and 4.88 t ha -1 , respectively.<br />
Table 95 : Performance of salt tolerant varieties of<br />
rice at farmers’ field<br />
Crop variety<br />
<strong>2010</strong><br />
No. Av. yield (t ha -1 )<br />
Rice-CSR 23 9 4.52<br />
Rice-CSR 30 20 3.13<br />
Rice-CSR 36 9 4.88<br />
Total 38 -<br />
Demonstration on Salt Tolerant Varieties of<br />
Wheat (R.K. Singh and Ram Ajore)<br />
During rabi season, 21 demonstrations<br />
were conducted at farmers’ field on salt<br />
tolerant wheat variety KRL 19. The results<br />
indicated that it gave an average yield of 4.25<br />
t ha -1 at salinity stress situation (Table 96).<br />
Demonstration on Salt Tolerant Varieties of<br />
Mustard (R.K. Singh and Ram Ajore)<br />
During rabi season of 2009-10, 64 demonstrations<br />
on salt tolerant varieties of mustard (CS 54<br />
and CS 56) were conducted at farmers’ fields<br />
(Table 96). The variety CS 54 gave an average<br />
yield of 1.75 t ha -1 , whereas variety CS 56 gave<br />
1.88 t ha -1 in salt affected soils of Haryana.<br />
Demonstration of wheat variety KRL 19<br />
on farmer’s field<br />
Table 96 : Performance of salt tolerant varieties of<br />
wheat and mustard at farmer’s field<br />
Crop variety<br />
No.<br />
2009-10<br />
Average yield<br />
(t ha -1 )<br />
Wheat-KRL 19 21 4.25<br />
Mustard-CS 54 32 1.75<br />
Mustard-CS 56 32 1.88<br />
Socio-Economic Impact of Salt Tolerant Crop<br />
Varieties (R.S. Tripathi, R.K. Gautam, Neeraj<br />
Kulshreshtha, P.C. Sharma and Ali Qadar)<br />
The institute has developed number of salt<br />
tolerant varieties of rice, wheat and mustard.<br />
These varieties have made remarkable impact<br />
on agricultural productivity and raising farmers’<br />
livelihood in the salt affected areas of the country.<br />
Total quantity of breeder/labelled/certified<br />
seed produced and distributed is presented in<br />
Table 97, which indicates that major share of<br />
these seeds was of rice varieties (60 percent of<br />
the total seeds produced). Contribution of wheat<br />
was about 39 percent. The state-wise distribution<br />
pattern of salt tolerant seeds of rice and wheat is<br />
given in Table 98 and 99, respectively. The statewise<br />
distribution pattern revealed that about 58<br />
per cent of the total rice was consumed in the<br />
state of Haryana alone. Uttar Pradesh was the<br />
second important state where about 21 percent<br />
rice seed was supplied. In case of salt tolerant<br />
wheat varieties, almost half of the total quantity<br />
of seeds was utilized in Haryana and 44 per cent<br />
in Uttar Pradesh. Small quantity of rice seed was<br />
supplied to Bihar, while little quantity of wheat<br />
seed to Rajasthan.<br />
Table 97 : Breeder/ labelled/ certified seeds of<br />
salt tolerant varieties produced and<br />
distributed during the year 2000 - 09<br />
Crop Quantity (tonnes) Percentage<br />
Rice 18.95 59.70<br />
Wheat 12.32 38.80<br />
Mustard 0.49 1.50<br />
Total 31.76 100.00<br />
<strong>11</strong>7
Technology assessed and transferred <strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
Table 98 : State wise distribution of salt tolerant seed of rice varieties (%)<br />
State CSR 10 CSR 13 CSR 23 CSR 27 CSR 30 CSR 36 Total<br />
Haryana 40.0 25.0 65.1 38.1 87.1 90.8 57.8<br />
Uttar Pradesh 60.0 50.0 1.4 - 12.0 1.0 20.7<br />
Punjab - - - - 0.9 - 0.01<br />
Bihar - - 31.7 13.3 - 7.7 8.8<br />
Others - 25.0 1.9 48.6 - 0.6 12.7<br />
Table 99 : State-wise distribution of seed of salt<br />
tolerant wheat varieties (%)<br />
State KRL 1-4 KRL 19 Total<br />
Haryana 54.27 44.24 49.26<br />
Uttar Pradesh 40.56 47.00 43.78<br />
Punjab 1.50 0.40 0.75<br />
Rajasthan 3.29 6.03 4.86<br />
Gujarat 0.38 1.27 0.83<br />
Economic Impact of Zero Tillage Technology in<br />
Reclaimed Sodic <strong>Soil</strong>s (R.S. Tripathi)<br />
Zero tillage technology is probably one of the<br />
best ways to reduce the cost of cultivation and<br />
sustaining productivity of natural resources like<br />
soil and water. It reduces input cost, sustains<br />
yield, enhances profitability, improves soil<br />
nutrients and offers benefits of retained surface<br />
residues and reduced soil and water losses.<br />
Results of the study, based on zero tillage practice<br />
adopted at <strong>CSSRI</strong> farm during the year 2009-10<br />
for <strong>11</strong> crops, indicated that on an average, there<br />
was 40 per cent saving of human labour in zero<br />
tillage as compared to conventional method of<br />
crop production. In field preparation, savings of<br />
machine power was 60 per cent and irrigation<br />
water 25 per cent in zero tillage as compared to<br />
conventional method. On an average, there was<br />
30 per cent reduction in the cost of cultivation<br />
under zero tillage as compared to conventional<br />
method of crop production (Table 100).<br />
Response of gypsum in wheat<br />
Technology for reclamation of sodic soil and<br />
water using gypsum was demonstrated at the<br />
field of Sh. Virender Singh, village Bhurjat, Distt.<br />
Mahendragarh. The yield of wheat increased<br />
significantly with the increasing dose of gypsum<br />
application (Table 101). The treatment G 100<br />
increased the wheat yield by more than 2 times<br />
over G 0<br />
. An appreciable increase in yields was<br />
observed in other treatments also.<br />
Table 100 : Cost of cultivation for crops grown by<br />
Crop<br />
zero and conventional tillage<br />
Cost of cultivation (Rs. ha -1 )<br />
Conv.<br />
method<br />
Zero tillage<br />
method<br />
Reduction<br />
(%)<br />
Arhar 24,581 15,323 37.66<br />
Sorghum 21,294 15,522 27.<strong>11</strong><br />
Moong 24,432 17,636 27.82<br />
Soybean 29,927 19,913 33.46<br />
Guar 19,959 10,631 46.74<br />
Bajra 23,290 15,167 34.88<br />
Barley 27,586 18,949 31.31<br />
Oat 27,586 19,042 30.97<br />
Wheat 36,020 26,994 25.06<br />
Mustard 29,285 18,398 37.18<br />
Gram 33,713 22,693 32.69<br />
Average 27,800 18,500 30.00<br />
Table 101 : Effect of gypsum on wheat yield at<br />
farmer’s field<br />
Treatments Grain yield (t ha -1 )<br />
G 0<br />
1.61<br />
G 25<br />
2.80<br />
G 50<br />
3.55<br />
G 75<br />
3.88<br />
G 100<br />
4.62<br />
CD (5%) 0.49<br />
Demonstration of wheat varieties at farmer’s field in Village Bhurjat District Mahendragarh<br />
<strong>11</strong>8
General/ Miscellaneous
<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
Sr.<br />
No<br />
TRAININGS IN INDIA AND ABROAD<br />
Name and Designation Subject Duration Place<br />
1. Dr. S.K. Gupta<br />
Project Co-ordinator (SWS)<br />
Dr. D.S. Bundela<br />
Principal Scientist<br />
Dr. R.L. Meena<br />
Scientist (SS)<br />
Sh. J.P. Sharma<br />
Technical Officer<br />
Sh. S.K. Dahiya<br />
Technical Officer<br />
Sh. M.P. Bhatia<br />
Technical Assistant<br />
2. Sh. Sultan Singh<br />
Mrs. Sushma Garg<br />
Mrs.Jasbir Kaur, Mrs.Anita<br />
Assistants<br />
Sh. BachanSingh<br />
Sh. Hari Pal<br />
Sr. Clerks<br />
3. Sh. M.N.V. Rao<br />
Jr. Acctts Officer<br />
Sh. K.R.K. Prasad<br />
Lab. Technician<br />
4. Dr. R.L. Meena<br />
Scientist (Sr. Scale)<br />
5. Dr. R.K. Yadav<br />
Principal Scientist<br />
Special Course on Performance<br />
Evaluation of Canal Irrigation projects<br />
using Remote Sensing and GIS<br />
Sponsored by NAIP<br />
Training on Hindi Typing and Official<br />
Correspondence<br />
Technical and Administrative Support<br />
for Consortia based <strong>Research</strong> in<br />
Agriculture<br />
International Training Programme on<br />
Bioremediation (Phyto-remediation)<br />
Sponsored by NAIP (ICAR)<br />
Training under Public Sector Linkage<br />
Programme under AusAid Project<br />
15.4.<strong>2010</strong>-<br />
24.4.<strong>2010</strong><br />
24.5.<strong>2010</strong>-<br />
26.5.<strong>2010</strong><br />
16.6.<strong>2010</strong>-<br />
22.6.<strong>2010</strong><br />
15.7.<strong>2010</strong>-<br />
13.10.<strong>2010</strong><br />
02.8.<strong>2010</strong> -<br />
24.9.<strong>2010</strong><br />
IIRS,<br />
Dehradun<br />
UPSC,<br />
New Delhi<br />
NAARM,<br />
Hyderabad<br />
USDA,<br />
Beltsville,<br />
Maryland<br />
(USA)<br />
Australia,<br />
Thailand<br />
6. Mrs. Dinesh Gugnani<br />
Mrs. Santra Mrs. Rita<br />
Sr. Stenographers<br />
7. Dr. Parveen Kumar<br />
Principal Scientist<br />
8. Dr. B.K. Bandyopadhyay<br />
Principal Scientist<br />
Dr. D. Burman<br />
Senior Scientist<br />
9. Sh. Jai Pal Singh<br />
Assistant<br />
Training Course for Personal Assistant 09.8.<strong>2010</strong>-<br />
20.8.<strong>2010</strong><br />
Crop Modeling, Templates and<br />
Tools for the Use of Trial Data in<br />
Performance Prediction and Targeting<br />
of Potato Clones and Varieties<br />
Workshop on Procurement related<br />
Matter and Financial Management<br />
System under World Bank Funded<br />
Project of NAIP<br />
Noting and Drafting for Section<br />
Officers/Dealing Asstt<br />
09.8.<strong>2010</strong>-<br />
13.8.<strong>2010</strong><br />
August 17-18,<br />
<strong>2010</strong><br />
06.9.<strong>2010</strong>-<br />
08.9.<strong>2010</strong><br />
ISTM,<br />
New Delhi<br />
CPRI,<br />
Shimla<br />
ICAR<br />
<strong>Research</strong><br />
Complex<br />
for Eastern<br />
Region, Patna<br />
ISTM,<br />
New Delhi<br />
10. Sh. VishalAcharya<br />
AF&AO<br />
Sh. H.S. Pal<br />
Assistant<br />
Management Development<br />
Programme<br />
07.9.<strong>2010</strong>-<br />
10.9.<strong>2010</strong><br />
Thiruvananthapuram<br />
121
Trainings in india and abroad <strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
<strong>11</strong>. Sh. Surender Mohan<br />
Farm Manager<br />
<strong>Research</strong> Station Management to Farm<br />
Managers<br />
<strong>11</strong>.10.<strong>2010</strong>-<br />
16.10.<strong>2010</strong><br />
ICRISAT,<br />
Hyderabad<br />
12. Dr. H.S. Jat<br />
Sr. Scientist<br />
Improved Prediction of Agroforestry<br />
Productivity and Reclamation<br />
Opportunities in Shallow Water Table<br />
and Salt Affected Landscapes of India<br />
and Pakistan<br />
18.10.<strong>2010</strong>-<br />
22.10.<strong>2010</strong><br />
PAU,<br />
Ludhiana<br />
13. Dr. R. Raju<br />
Scientist<br />
Model Training Course on Integrated<br />
Water Resources Management<br />
and Use of Poor Quality Water in<br />
Agriculture<br />
23.<strong>11</strong>.<strong>2010</strong>-<br />
30.<strong>11</strong>.<strong>2010</strong><br />
<strong>CSSRI</strong><br />
Karnal<br />
14. Dr. Pragati Maity<br />
Scientist<br />
Training Programme on Data Analysis<br />
Using SAS<br />
18.12.<strong>2010</strong>-<br />
24.12.<strong>2010</strong><br />
NDRI<br />
Karnal<br />
15. Dr. R. Raju<br />
Scientist<br />
Dr. S. L.Krishna Murthi<br />
Scientist<br />
16. Dr. P.C. Sharma<br />
Principal Scientist<br />
Data Analysis Using SAS 24.1.20<strong>11</strong>-<br />
31.1.20<strong>11</strong><br />
Participated in Training Workshop on<br />
Right to Information Act 2005<br />
03.2.20<strong>11</strong>-<br />
05.2.20<strong>11</strong><br />
NDRI<br />
Karnal<br />
New Delhi.<br />
17. Sh. B. M. Meena<br />
Lib. Asstt.<br />
National Conference of Agricultural<br />
Libraries User Community<br />
24.2.20<strong>11</strong>-<br />
25.2.<strong>2010</strong><br />
IARI,<br />
New Delhi<br />
18. Dr. D.S. Bundela<br />
Principal Scientist<br />
Training on NAIP Procurement and<br />
Financial Management System<br />
28.2.20<strong>11</strong> NDRI, Karnal<br />
19. Sh. Rajeev Kumar<br />
Technical Officer<br />
Statistical Computing Environment 22.3.20<strong>11</strong>-<br />
28.3.20<strong>11</strong><br />
NDRI,<br />
Karnal<br />
<br />
122
<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
DEPUTATION OF SCIENTISTS ABROAD<br />
Sr.<br />
No<br />
Name Subject Period of<br />
deputation<br />
1. Dr. R.K. Singh Participated in 12 th International Congress of<br />
Ethnobiology<br />
2. Dr. P.C. Sharma Study visit on “Performance of Terminal Drought<br />
Tolerance QTL-NILs of Pearl Millet under<br />
Salt Stress and Identification of Polymorphic<br />
Gene based Primers in Salt Tolerant & Sensitve<br />
Genotypes of Indian Mustard<br />
02.5.<strong>2010</strong> to<br />
14.5.<strong>2010</strong><br />
07.5.<strong>2010</strong> to<br />
03.7.<strong>2010</strong><br />
Country<br />
Canada<br />
United<br />
Kingdom<br />
3. Dr. R.K. Singh Participated in 18 th Commonwealth Forestry<br />
Conference<br />
4. Dr. N.P.S.<br />
Yaduvanshi<br />
Participated in 9 th World Congress of <strong>Soil</strong><br />
Science<br />
5. Dr. Y.P. Singh Consultant IRRI- East & South Africa Region<br />
Office (ESARO)<br />
28.6.<strong>2010</strong> to<br />
02.7.<strong>2010</strong><br />
31.7.<strong>2010</strong> to<br />
12.8.<strong>2010</strong><br />
01.9.<strong>2010</strong> to<br />
31.8.20<strong>11</strong><br />
United<br />
Kingdom<br />
Australia<br />
Tanzania<br />
6. Dr. Pradip Dey Participated in the World Bank Summit 27.9.<strong>2010</strong> to<br />
30.9.<strong>2010</strong><br />
7. Sh Gajender Yadav Study leave 01.10.<strong>2010</strong> to<br />
30.09.2013<br />
USA<br />
United<br />
Kingdom<br />
8. Dr. S.K. Kamra Participated in Brazilian Symposium on<br />
<strong>Salinity</strong><br />
9. Dr. J.C. Dagar Participated in Global Forum on Salinization<br />
and Climate Change (GFSCC)-<strong>2010</strong><br />
10. Dr. Chhedi Lal Participated in International German Academic<br />
Exchange Service (DAAD) Alumni Summer<br />
School “Water & Energy<br />
<strong>11</strong>. Dr. S.K. Kamra Workshop of INNO-ASIA Project at Department<br />
of Geo- informatics, Friedrich Schiller University<br />
of Jena, Germany<br />
12.10.<strong>2010</strong> to<br />
15.10.<strong>2010</strong><br />
25.10.<strong>2010</strong> to<br />
29.10.<strong>2010</strong><br />
14.<strong>11</strong>.<strong>2010</strong> to<br />
26.<strong>11</strong>.<strong>2010</strong><br />
07.02.20<strong>11</strong> to<br />
<strong>11</strong>.02.20<strong>11</strong><br />
Brazil<br />
Spain<br />
Germany<br />
Germany<br />
12. Dr. B. K.<br />
Bandyopadhyay<br />
Workshop on Project Proposal Development on<br />
Ganges Delta Challenge Programme on Water<br />
and Food<br />
24.1.20<strong>11</strong> to<br />
27.1.20<strong>11</strong><br />
Bangladesh<br />
13. Dr. B. K.<br />
Bandyopadhyay<br />
Participated in the Conference on Deltas under<br />
Climate Change: The Challenges of Adaptation<br />
02.03.20<strong>11</strong> to<br />
0 4.03. 20<strong>11</strong><br />
Vietnam<br />
<br />
123
<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
AWARDS AND RECOGNITIONS<br />
• The Institute has been bestowed with the<br />
Sardar Patel Best Institute Award - 2009 by<br />
the Council at NAAS complex, New Delhi<br />
on 16.7.<strong>2010</strong><br />
• Out of 39 research organizations funded<br />
under Farmers’ Participatory Action<br />
<strong>Research</strong> Project (FPARP), the Institute<br />
has been bestowed with the National<br />
Groundwater Augmentation Award (20<strong>11</strong>)<br />
on Enhancement of Groundwater Recharge<br />
and Water Productivity in North West India<br />
by the Ministry of Water Resources (Govt.<br />
of India) during 3 rd Ground Water Congress<br />
organized at New Delhi on March 22-23,<br />
20<strong>11</strong><br />
• Dr. S.K. Gupta, Project Coordinator, AICRP<br />
on Management of Salt Affected <strong>Soil</strong>s and<br />
Use of Saline Water in Agriculture has been<br />
bestowed with the Fellowship of the Indian<br />
Society of Coastal Agricultural <strong>Research</strong><br />
for his outstanding contribution in water<br />
management in coastal ecosystem and to<br />
alleviate the salinity problems in Tsunami<br />
affected agricultural lands in Andaman<br />
and Nicobar Islands, Tamil Nadu and<br />
Maldives.<br />
• Commonwealth Scholarship Commission<br />
has awarded its prestigious scholarship<br />
award under the Commonwealth<br />
Scholarship and Fellowship Plan-<strong>2010</strong> to Sh.<br />
Gajender Yadav, Scientist (Agronomy) for<br />
pursuing his doctoral research at University<br />
of Reading, U.K. w.e.f October, <strong>2010</strong><br />
• Dr. Ranjay K. Singh, Senior Scientist has been<br />
conferred with Lansdowne Distinguished<br />
Professor Award-<strong>2010</strong> for his outstanding<br />
contribution in the field of traditional<br />
ecological knowledge, community based<br />
biodiversity conservation and community<br />
mobilization in sustainable natural<br />
resources conservation in eastern Himalaya.<br />
He has also been conferred the prestigious<br />
Fellowship of The Linnean Society of<br />
London for his outstanding contribution in<br />
the field of participatory community based<br />
biocultural diversity conservation in eastern<br />
Himalayas<br />
• Dr. Sanjay Arora, Senior Scientist was<br />
bestowed with the Gold Medal by <strong>Soil</strong><br />
Conservation Society of India (SCSI), New<br />
Delhi for his outstanding contribution<br />
in Natural Resource Management and<br />
Development especially in the field of <strong>Soil</strong><br />
and Water Conservation<br />
• Dr. S.K. Chaudhari, Principal Scientist<br />
has been conferred with the Fellowship<br />
of Maharashtra Academy of Sciences<br />
Dr. S.K. Gupta, Director (A) receiving the Sadar Patel<br />
Best Institute Award -2009 from Shri Sharad Pawar ji,<br />
Hon’ble Minister of Agriculture, Consumer Affairs, Food<br />
and Public Distribution, Govt. of India, New Delhi<br />
Dr. D.K. Sharma, Director receiving the National<br />
Groundwater Augmentation Award - 20<strong>11</strong> from<br />
Shri Salman Khurshid, Hon’ble Minister of Water<br />
Resources, Govt. of India, New Delhi<br />
124
<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
Awards and recognitions<br />
for advancing the knowledge and<br />
understanding of soil-water dynamics in<br />
Vertisols and developing new concepts<br />
explaining changes in the hydraulic<br />
properties of Vertisols. He has also been<br />
bestowed with Outstanding Achievement<br />
Award of the Institution of Engineers (India)<br />
in the field of Irrigation Water Management<br />
for the year 2009-10 for his contributions<br />
in on-farm water management research<br />
in promoting efficient water management<br />
technologies in the tribal areas.<br />
• Dr. Pradip Dey has been bestowed with<br />
the World Bank Summit Scholarship by the<br />
World Bank, Washington, DC. He has also<br />
been designated as Social Innovator by the<br />
World Bank<br />
• Dr Parveen Kumar has been awarded<br />
Indian Potato Association - Kaushalaya<br />
Sikka Memorial Award 2005-09 for his<br />
outstanding research contribution in the<br />
area of Biochemical Parameters Influencing<br />
Processing Quality in Potato<br />
• Dr. C.B. Pandey was conferred with Dr.<br />
K.G. Tejwani award on 10.12.<strong>2010</strong> for the<br />
year 2009 by Indian Society of Agroforestry,<br />
Jhansi for his outstanding work in<br />
Agroforestry <strong>Research</strong> and Development<br />
• Krishi Kiran Patrika (Hindi) of this institute<br />
also begged the coveted Ganesh Sankar<br />
Vidhyarthi Hindi Krishi Patrika Pursakar–<br />
2009.<br />
<strong>CSSRI</strong> Excellence Awards<br />
The following scientists were bestowed with<br />
prestigious <strong>CSSRI</strong> Excellence Award on <strong>Soil</strong><br />
<strong>Salinity</strong> and Water Quality:<br />
Biennium 2004-05: Jointly to Dr. S.K. Gupta,<br />
Project Co-ordinator, AICRP on Use of Saline<br />
Water in Agriculture, <strong>CSSRI</strong>, Karnal and<br />
Dr. S.G. Patil, Chief Scientist (Water<br />
Management) University of Agricultural<br />
Sciences, Dharwad.<br />
Biennium 2006-07: Jointly to Dr. J.C. Dagar,<br />
Assistant Director General (Agronomy), ICAR,<br />
New Delhi and Dr. B.A. Chougule, Ex-Officer<br />
Incharge, Agricultural <strong>Research</strong> Station, MPKV,<br />
Sangli.<br />
The following technical, administrative and<br />
supporting staff was awarded Best Worker<br />
Award-<strong>2010</strong>:<br />
Dr. S.K. Jha, Technical Officer (T 7-8)<br />
Sh. S.K. Goel, Assistant<br />
Sh. Karam Singh, Skilled Supporting Staff<br />
Dr. S.K. Gupta, Director (A) receiving the Ganesh Sankar<br />
Vidhyarthi Hindi Krishi Patrika Pursakar–2009 from<br />
Prof. V.K. Thomas, Hon’ble Minister of State for<br />
Agriculture, Govt. of India, New Delhi<br />
125
<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
LINKAGES AND COLLABORATIONS<br />
Collaborative Programmes at Main Institute,<br />
Karnal<br />
International Collaborations<br />
• BIOSAFOR-BIOSALINE (AGRO)<br />
FORESTRY : Remediation of saline<br />
wastelands through production of<br />
renewable energy, biomaterials and fodder<br />
(Funded by European Union)<br />
• Stress tolerant rice for poor farmers of Africa<br />
and South Asia (Funded by IRRI-BMGF)<br />
• Enhancing and stabilizing the productivity<br />
of salt affected areas by incorporating<br />
genes for tolerance of abiotic stresses in rice<br />
(Funded by BMZ-IRRI)<br />
• Wheat improvement for waterlogging,<br />
salinity and element toxicities in Australia<br />
and India (sponsored by ACIAR, Australia)<br />
• Cereal Systems Initiative for South Asia<br />
(CSISA) (sponsored by IRRI Philippines<br />
and CIMMYT Mexico)<br />
• Marker assisted breeding of abiotic stress<br />
tolerant rice varieties with major QTL for<br />
drought, submergence and salt tolerance<br />
(DBT-India-IRRI)<br />
National Collaborations<br />
• Transgenics in crops-salinity tolerance<br />
in rice: functional genomics component<br />
(Funded by ICAR)<br />
• Monitoring and evaluation of large-scale<br />
subsurface drainage projects in the state of<br />
Haryana (Funded by Haryana Operational<br />
Pilot Project, DOA, Haryana)<br />
• Development and evaluation of salt tolerant<br />
transgenic rice (Funded by Department of<br />
Bio-technology)<br />
• Farmers’ participatory research on<br />
enhancing groundwater recharge and water<br />
productivity in North-West India (Funded<br />
by Ministry of Water Resources, GOI))<br />
• Control of waterlogging and salinity<br />
through agroforestry interventions (Funded<br />
by INCID)<br />
• Multi-locational evaluation of bread wheat<br />
germplasm (Funded by NBPGR)<br />
• AMAAS-Application of micro-organism in<br />
agriculture and allied sectors (Funded by<br />
ICAR)<br />
• Intellectual property management and<br />
transfer/commercialization of agricultural<br />
technology system (Funded by ICAR)<br />
• Development of spectral reflectance<br />
methods and low cost sensors for real<br />
time applications of variable rate inputs in<br />
precision farming (Funded by NAIP)<br />
• Network project on improvement of<br />
salt tolerance in wheat using molecular<br />
approach (DWR-<strong>CSSRI</strong>)<br />
• Decision support system for enhancing<br />
productivity in irrigated saline environment<br />
using remote sensing modelling and GIS<br />
(Funded by NAIP)<br />
Collaborative programmes at Regional<br />
<strong>Research</strong> Station, Canning Town<br />
International Collaborations<br />
• International collaborative programme on<br />
testing rice germplasm for coastal salinity<br />
(IRSSTN) with IRRI, Philippines<br />
• Advanced cultures on rice for shallow<br />
and deep water situations with IRRI,<br />
Philippines<br />
• IRRI-BMZ Project on incorporation of salt<br />
tolerance gene in rice<br />
National Collaborations<br />
• Coastal salinity tolerant varietal trial<br />
(CSTVT) with DRR, Hyderabad<br />
126
<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
Linkages and collaborations<br />
• Strategies for sustainable management<br />
of degraded coastal land and water for<br />
enhancing livelihood security of farming<br />
communities (NAIP GFF Funding )<br />
Collaborative programmes at Regional<br />
<strong>Research</strong> Station, Lucknow<br />
International Collaborations<br />
• IRRI-BMZ project on incorporation of salt<br />
tolerance gene in rice (Funded by BMZ-<br />
IRRI)<br />
• Stress tolerant rice for poor farmers of Africa<br />
and South Asia (Funded by BMGF-IRRI)<br />
National Collaborations<br />
• Holistic approach for improved livelihood<br />
security through livestock based farming<br />
system in Barabanki and Rai Bareily districts<br />
of U.P. ( Funded by NAIP)<br />
• Impact assessment of climate change on crop<br />
production under salt affected environment<br />
of Uttar Pradesh (ICAR-Network Project)<br />
Collaborative programmes at Regional<br />
<strong>Research</strong> Station, Bharuch<br />
National Collaborations<br />
• Feasibility study using biological sludge<br />
from Nitro-ETP Plant and treated effluent<br />
from Environmental Control Unit 1 of<br />
GNFC for crop production on Vertisols<br />
(GNVFC, Bharuch)<br />
• Feasibility studies on the use of treated<br />
effluent from Aniline-TDI Plant of GNFC<br />
Unit II in diverse crop interventions on<br />
Vertisols (GNVFC, Bharuch)<br />
<br />
127
<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
LIST OF PUBLICATIONS<br />
Journal Papers<br />
Arora, Sanjay and Chahal, D.S. <strong>2010</strong>. Chemical<br />
forms of boron in relation to soil properties<br />
and their contribution to available and total<br />
boron pool. Agrochemica, LIV (4): 193-204<br />
Arora, Sanjay and Chahal, D.S. <strong>2010</strong>. Effect of<br />
soil properties on boron adsorption and<br />
release in arid and semi-arid benchmark<br />
soils. Communications in <strong>Soil</strong> Science and Plant<br />
Analysis, 41 (21): 2532-2544.<br />
Bandyopadhyay, B.K., Mandal, Subhasis,<br />
Burman, D. and Sarangi, S. K. <strong>2010</strong>. <strong>Soil</strong> and<br />
water management options for enhancing<br />
agricultural productivity of coastal area of<br />
West Bengal. Journal of the Indian Society of<br />
Coastal Agricultural <strong>Research</strong>, 28(1): 1-7.<br />
Bandyopadhyay, S., Mandal, S., Datta, K. K.,<br />
Devi, P., Bhattacharya, D. and Bera, A. K. <strong>2010</strong>.<br />
Economic analysis of risk of gastrointestinal<br />
parasite infection in cattle in North Eastern<br />
States of India, Tropical Animal Health and<br />
Production, 42(7):1481-1486.<br />
Bhatt, B.P., Sarangi, S.K. and De, L.C. <strong>2010</strong>.<br />
Fuel wood characteristics of some firewood<br />
trees and shurbs of eastern Himalaya, India.<br />
Energy Sources Part A, 32: 469-474.<br />
Burman, D. Bandyopadhyay, B.K. and Mahanta,<br />
K. K. <strong>2010</strong>. Management of acid sulphate soil<br />
of coastal Sunderban Region: Observations<br />
under On-farm trial. Journal of the Indian<br />
Society of Coastal Agricultural <strong>Research</strong>, 28(1):8-<br />
<strong>11</strong>.<br />
Chander, Subhash, Sharma, K.C., Jat, H.S and<br />
Meena, Rajpal. <strong>2010</strong>. Productivity and quality<br />
of arable crops and soil fertility as influenced<br />
by ley farming in hot region of Rajasthan.<br />
Indian Journal of Agronomy, 55 (2): 157-164.<br />
Chaudhari, S.K., Sahu S.C. and Khot A.B. <strong>2010</strong>.<br />
Response of french bean (Phaseolus vulgaris)<br />
to irrigation schedules, phosphorus levels<br />
and phosphorus solublizer in Vertisols.<br />
Environment and Ecology, 28 (3B): 2141-2143.<br />
Chaudhari, S.K., Somawanshi, R.B. and<br />
Bardhan, G. 2007. Effect of water quality on<br />
moisture retention in the soils of different<br />
texture. Journal of Agricultural Physics, 7:<br />
20-26. (published in <strong>2010</strong>)<br />
Dey, P., Rai, Mathura, Gangopadhyay, K.K.,<br />
Das, Bikash, Nath, Vishal and Reddy, N.N.<br />
<strong>2010</strong>. Effect of phosphorus on growth, yield<br />
use efficiency and leaf nutrient composition<br />
of litchi grown on alfisol. Indian J. Hort, 67(3):<br />
394-396.<br />
Dushyantha, Kumar, B.M., Shadakshari, Y.G.<br />
and Krishnamurthy, S.L. <strong>2010</strong>. Genotype<br />
x environment interaction and stability<br />
analysis for grain yield and its components<br />
in Halugidda local rice mutants. Electronic<br />
Journal of Plant Breeding, 1(5): 1286- 1289.<br />
Dubey, S.K., Yadav, Rashmi, Yadav, R.K., Sharma,<br />
V.K. and Minhas, P.S.. <strong>2010</strong>. Contamination<br />
of ground water as a consequence of land<br />
disposal of dye waste mixed sewage effluents:<br />
A case study of Panipat District of Haryana,<br />
India. Bull. Environ Contamination Toxicology,<br />
85: 295–300<br />
Gautam, R.K., Nayak, A.K., Sharma, D.K.,<br />
Qadar, Ali, Dey, P. and Singh, G. <strong>2010</strong>.<br />
Morphological and chemical fingerprinting of<br />
Sweet Basil (Ocimum basilicum L.) genotypes<br />
grown in sodic soil. Agrochimica, 54 (5): 289-<br />
302.<br />
Gopali, Bardhan, S.K. Chaudhari, and P.K.<br />
Mohapatra. <strong>2010</strong>. Saturated hydraulic<br />
conductivity of Vertisol, Inceptisol and<br />
Entisol as influenced by irrigation water<br />
quality. Journal of <strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Salinity</strong> and Water<br />
Quality, 2: 45-53.<br />
Hadda, M.S. and Arora, Sanjay. <strong>2010</strong>. Water<br />
productivity through rainwater harvesting<br />
and land treatment in rainfed sub-montane<br />
region. Journal of <strong>Soil</strong> and Water Conservation,<br />
9(2) : 109-<strong>11</strong>3.<br />
Jat, H.S., Mann, J.S., Sharma, S.C. and Chand,<br />
Roop. <strong>2010</strong>. Distribution and performance<br />
of ardu (Ailanthus spp) in semi-arid regions<br />
of Rajasthan. The Indian Journal of Small<br />
Ruminants, 16 (2): 232-235.<br />
128
<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
List of publications<br />
Joshi, P.K., Kumar, R., Rajput, V.D. and Singh,<br />
N. <strong>2010</strong>. Isolation and screening of bacterial<br />
isolates for tolerance to heavy metals. Journal<br />
of <strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Salinity</strong> and Water Quality, 2 (1): 12-17.<br />
Kadam, D.M., Nangare, D.D., Singh, R. and<br />
Kumar, S. 20<strong>11</strong>. Low-cost greenhouse<br />
technology for drying onion (Allium cepa<br />
l.) slices. Journal of Food Process Engineering.<br />
34(1):67-82.<br />
Kaur, S., Arora, Sanjay, Jalali, V.K. and Mondal,<br />
A.K. <strong>2010</strong>. <strong>Soil</strong> sulphur forms in relation to<br />
physical and chemical properties of mid-hill<br />
soils of North India. Communications in <strong>Soil</strong><br />
Science and Plant Analysis, 41(3): 277-289.<br />
Krishan Kumar and Gupta, S.K. <strong>2010</strong>. Decline<br />
of groundwater tables in the upper Yamuna<br />
basin : Causes and management strategies.<br />
Irrigation and Drainage, 47: 606-620<br />
Kumar, S. and Dey, P. 20<strong>11</strong>. Effects of different<br />
mulches and irrigation methods on root<br />
growth, nutrient uptake, water-use efficiency<br />
and yield of strawberry. Scientia Hort. 127(3):<br />
318-324.<br />
Mandal, A.K. and Sharma, R.C. <strong>2010</strong>.<br />
Computerized database of salt affected<br />
soils in peninsular region of India using<br />
Geographic Information System. Journal of the<br />
Indian Society of <strong>Soil</strong> Science, 58(1): 105-<strong>11</strong>6.<br />
Mandal, Subhasis and Datta, K.K. <strong>2010</strong>. Economic<br />
evaluation of farming system research in<br />
NEH Region: Some Issues, Indian Journal of<br />
Agricultural Economics, 65(1):<strong>11</strong>8-134.<br />
Marwaha, R.S., Pandey, S.K., Kumar, Dinesh,<br />
Singh, S.V. and Kumar, Parveen. <strong>2010</strong>. Potato<br />
processing scenario in India: Industrial<br />
limitations, future projections, challenges<br />
ahead and remedies – A review. J. Food<br />
Science Technology, 47(2):137-156.<br />
Pandey C.B. and Chaudhari S.K. <strong>2010</strong>. <strong>Soil</strong> and<br />
nutrient losses for different land uses and<br />
vegetative methods for their control on hilly<br />
terrain of South Andaman. Indian Journal of<br />
Agricultural Sciences, 80:399-404.<br />
Pandey C.B., Chaudhari S.K., Dagar J.C., Singh<br />
G.B. and Singh R.K. <strong>2010</strong>. <strong>Soil</strong> N mineralization<br />
and microbial biomass carbon affected by<br />
different tillage levels in a hot humid tropic.<br />
<strong>Soil</strong> and Tillage <strong>Research</strong>, <strong>11</strong>0: 33-41.<br />
Sandhu, K.S., Chinna, G.S., Marwaha, R.S.,<br />
Kumar, Parveen and Pandey, S.K. <strong>2010</strong>.<br />
Effect of nitrogen fertilization on yield and<br />
chipping quality of processing varieties<br />
grown in cooler north Indian plains. Potato<br />
Journal, 37(3-4): 143-150.<br />
Sarangi, S.K., Saikia, U.S. and Lama, T.D. <strong>2010</strong>.<br />
Effect of rice (Oryza sativa) straw mulching<br />
on the performance of rapeseed (Brassica<br />
campestris) varieties in rice-rapeseed cropping<br />
system. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences,<br />
80(7): 603-605.<br />
Satapathy, K.K. and Sarangi, S.K. <strong>2010</strong>. Longterm<br />
effect of alternate land use systems on<br />
hydrology, soil properties and economics<br />
in a fragile hill ecosystem. Journal of <strong>Soil</strong> and<br />
Water Conservation, 9(1): 46-50.<br />
Sharma, A., Jalali, V.K. and Arora, Sanjay. <strong>2010</strong>.<br />
Non-exchangeable potassium release and<br />
its removal in foot-hill soils of North-west<br />
Himalayas. Catena, 82(2): <strong>11</strong>2-<strong>11</strong>7.<br />
Singh, Ravender, Chaudhari, S.K., Kundu, D.K.,<br />
Sengar, S.S. and Kumar Ashwani. <strong>2010</strong>. Water<br />
storage capacity, erosion and dispersion<br />
behaviour of major soil sub-groups of<br />
Chhattisgarh. Journal of Indian Society of <strong>Soil</strong><br />
Science, 58:64-69.<br />
Singh, Gurbachan, Bundela, D.S., Sethi,<br />
Madhurama, Lal, K. and Kamra, S.K. <strong>2010</strong>.<br />
Remote sensing and geographic information<br />
system for appraisal of salt-affected soils in<br />
India. Journal of Environmental Quality, 39(1):<br />
5-15.<br />
Singh, S.V., Pandey, S.K., Kumar, Dinesh,<br />
Marwaha, R.S., Manivel, P., Kumar Parveen,<br />
Singh, B.P. and Bhardwaj, V. <strong>2010</strong>. Kufri<br />
Frysona: First high yielding potato variety for<br />
French fries in India. Potato Journal, 37(3-4):<br />
103-109.<br />
Singh, Y.P., Singh, Ranbir, Sharma, D.K. <strong>2010</strong>.<br />
Determination of time frame for substitution<br />
of salt-tolerant varieties of rice (Oryza sativa)<br />
and wheat (Triticum aestivum) through crop<br />
diversification in sodic soils. Indian Journal of<br />
Agricultural Sciences, 80 (10):<br />
129
List of publications <strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
Verma, A. Gupta, S.K. and Isaac, R.K. <strong>2010</strong>.<br />
Long-term use of saline drainage waters<br />
for irrigation in subsurface drained lands:<br />
simulation modeling with SWAP. Journal of<br />
Agricultural Engineering, 47: 15-23.<br />
Yadav, R.K., Minhas, P.S., Khajanchi, Lal,<br />
Chaturvedi, R.K. and Verma, T. P. <strong>2010</strong>.<br />
Heavy metals distribution in semi-arid<br />
Ustochrepts, crops and ground water with<br />
long-term waste water irrigation. <strong>Soil</strong> Use<br />
and Management; DOI: 10. <strong>11</strong><strong>11</strong>/j. 1475-2743-<br />
<strong>2010</strong>.00267.x.<br />
Sharma, P.C., Sehgal, D., Singh, D., Singh, G.<br />
and Yadav, R.S. <strong>2010</strong>. A major terminal<br />
drought tolerance QTL of pearl millet is also<br />
associated with reduced salt uptake and<br />
enhanced growth under salt stress. Molecular<br />
Breeding, DOI 10.1007/s 1032-010-9423-3.<br />
Singh, D. and Sharma, P.C. <strong>2010</strong>. Effect of NaCl<br />
stress on photosynthesis characteristics and<br />
antioxidant enzymes in rice cultivars. Indian<br />
journal of Plant Physiology, 15 (3) : 255-258.<br />
Singh, D., Ram, P.C., Dar, S.R. and Sharma,<br />
P.C. <strong>2010</strong>. Alleviating adverse effects of<br />
soil salinity in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)<br />
through application of zinc fertilizer. Indian<br />
journal of Plant Physiology, 15 (4) : 389-395.<br />
Islam, M.T., Sharma, P.C., Gautam, R.K.,<br />
Singh, D., Singh, S., Panesar, B. and Ali, S.<br />
20<strong>11</strong>. Salt tolerance in parental lines of rice<br />
hybrids through physiological attributes<br />
and molecular markers. International Journal<br />
of Experimental Agriculture, (ISSN-1923-7766<br />
Online), 2 (1): 1-7.<br />
Conferences/Seminars/Symposia and<br />
Workshops papers<br />
Aishwath, O.P., Mehta, R.S., Meena, R.S., Ali,<br />
S.F., Anwer, M.M., Dagar, J.C., Yadav, R.K.,<br />
Lal, K. and Sethi, M. <strong>2010</strong>. Seed germination<br />
study of fenugreek cultivars with extended<br />
exposure to hyper saline conditions. In :<br />
Proceedings of XXI AICRP Workshop & National<br />
Consultation on Seed Spices held at National<br />
<strong>Research</strong> Centre on Seed Spices, Tabiji,<br />
Ajmer, Rajasthan during July 5-6, pp. 187.<br />
Ajore, Ram and R.S. Tripathi. <strong>2010</strong>. Sudhari<br />
Gai Kshariya Bhumi mein Gypsum Ke Punah<br />
Upyog Ki Aavashyakata Kyon ? In : Proceedings<br />
of the National Agricultural Science Seminar<br />
on Satat Krishi Utpadan, Samvardhan Evam<br />
Sanrakshan hetu Prakritik Sansadhano Ka<br />
Parbandhan, organized by the Bharatiya<br />
Krishi Anusandhan Samiti and <strong>Central</strong> <strong>Soil</strong><br />
<strong>Salinity</strong> <strong>Research</strong> Institute, Karnal, April 22-<br />
24, pp. 135-137.<br />
Arora, Sanjay and Hadda, M.S. <strong>2010</strong>. Coping<br />
with precipitation variability and soil<br />
moisture stress for agricultural productivity<br />
in the rainfed foothill region of the northwest<br />
Himalayas. In : International Conference on<br />
Food Security and Climate Change in Dry Areas<br />
held at Amman, Jordan during February 1-4.<br />
Arora, Sanjay, Rao, G.G., Chinchmalatpure,<br />
A.R. and Khandelwal, M.K. <strong>2010</strong>. Effect of<br />
biological sludge in conjunction with vermi<br />
compost on soil fertility and performance<br />
of cluster bean irrigated with saline waters<br />
in Vertisol. In : National Convention of Indian<br />
Society of <strong>Soil</strong> Science held at IISS, Bhopal,<br />
November 14-17.<br />
Arora, Sanjay, Rao, G.G., Chinchmalatpure,<br />
A.R. and Khandelwal, M.K. <strong>2010</strong>. Utilization<br />
of excavated calcareous saline soils on dykes<br />
of farm pond for vegetable production in<br />
Integrated Farming System Approach. In :<br />
National Conference on Watershed Management<br />
on Sloping Lands held at SCSI, Shillong during<br />
November <strong>11</strong>-13.<br />
Arora, Sanjay, Sharma, K.R. and Hadda, M.S.<br />
<strong>2010</strong>. Degradation of land resources in relation<br />
to soil erosion and agricultural productivity<br />
in foothills of Northwest Himalayas. In :<br />
International Conference on Combating Land<br />
Degradation in Agricultural Areas held at Xi’an,<br />
Shaanxi Province, China during October<br />
<strong>11</strong>-15.<br />
Bandyopadhyay, B.K., Burman, D., Sarangi,<br />
S.K., Mandal Subhasis, Mahanta, K.K. and<br />
Bal, A.R. <strong>2010</strong>. Farm pond technology for<br />
multi-cropping and enhancing income of<br />
marginal farmers in low-lying waterlogged<br />
coastal lands of Sundarbans. In : 9 th National<br />
Symposium of Indian Society of Coastal<br />
Agricultural <strong>Research</strong> on Recent outlook on<br />
Sustainable Agriculture, Livelihood Security and<br />
Ecology of Coastal Region held at Goa during<br />
October 27-30, p. 132.<br />
130
<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
List of publications<br />
Bundela, D.S., Sethi, Madhurama, Meena, R.L.,<br />
Gupta, S.K., Yaduvanshi, N.P.S. and Tripathi,<br />
R.S. 20<strong>11</strong>. Best management strategies for<br />
enhancing crop yield from the areas of low<br />
productivity in the WYC Command. In :<br />
Regional Workshop on Groundwater <strong>Salinity</strong>:<br />
Assessment, Management and Mitigation held<br />
at Karnal during March 18-19.<br />
Chinchmalatpure, A.R., Nayak, A.K. and<br />
G.Gururaja Rao. <strong>2010</strong>. Saline vertisols -<br />
characteristics, distribution and management.<br />
In : Symposium on Salt Affected <strong>Soil</strong>s” during<br />
75 th <strong>Annual</strong> Convention of Indian Society of <strong>Soil</strong><br />
Science held at Bhopal during November 14-<br />
17.<br />
Chinchmalatpure, Anil R., A.K. Nayak G.<br />
Gururaja Rao and M.K. Khandelwal.<br />
<strong>2010</strong>. <strong>Soil</strong> moisture and climatic indices of<br />
different micro-watersheds of Gujarat State<br />
for soil based crop planning. In : 75 th <strong>Annual</strong><br />
Convention of Indian Society of <strong>Soil</strong> Science held<br />
at Bhopal during November 14-17 .<br />
Damodaran, T. Kannan, R. Ahmed, Israr,<br />
Srivastava, R.C. and Umamaheshwari, S.<strong>2010</strong>.<br />
Characterization of mango diversity in Bay<br />
Islands using ISSR markers. In : National<br />
Seminar on Biodiversity in Mango for Sustainable<br />
Livelihood held at CISH-Rehmankhera,<br />
Lucknow during June 25-28, pp.36<br />
Damodaran, T., Rai, R.B., Sharma, D.K., Misra,<br />
V.K., Singh, Balvir, Dixit, Himanshu, Kannan,<br />
R.and Jha, S.K. <strong>2010</strong>. Development of ecofriendly<br />
technologies by utilization of native<br />
isolates of endophytes with commercial<br />
bioregulators to increase the yield and vase<br />
life of gladiolus. In : Fourth International<br />
Conference on Plant and Environment Pollution<br />
held at NBRI, Lucknow during December<br />
8-<strong>11</strong>, pp.173-174<br />
Damodaran, T., Rai, R.B.,.Pandey, B.K,.Mishra,<br />
V.K, Sharma, D.K.,.Ram, R.A., Kannan, R.<br />
and Dixit, Himanshu. 20<strong>11</strong>. Technology of<br />
banana cultivation with subsoil sodicity<br />
management and integration with rural<br />
poultry- A boon to marginal farmers for<br />
sustainable livelihood generation. In : X th<br />
Agricultural Science Congress held at NBFGR,<br />
Lucknow during February 10-12, pp. 92-93<br />
Damodaran, T., Nayak, A.K., Misra, V.K.,<br />
Sharma, D.K., Verma, C.L., Pandey, B.K., Jha,<br />
S.K., Dixit, Himanshu and Kannan, R.. <strong>2010</strong>.<br />
Strategies for management of sub soil sodicity<br />
for commercial cultivation of banana in the<br />
salt affected soils of Uttar Pradesh. In : Global<br />
Conference on Banana held at NRC Banana,<br />
Tiruchi during December 10-13, pp.73<br />
Gupta, S.K. <strong>2010</strong>. Management of saline sodic<br />
groundwaters. In : 75 th <strong>Annual</strong> Convention of<br />
Indian Society of <strong>Soil</strong> Science held at Bhopal<br />
during November 14-17.<br />
Gupta, S.K. <strong>2010</strong>. Raising productivity of sodic<br />
and waterlogged saline soils. In : Brainstorming<br />
on Second Green Revolution-Technologies for<br />
Eastern India held at ICAR <strong>Research</strong> Complex<br />
for Eastern Region, Patna during December,<br />
14-15.<br />
Gupta, S.K. <strong>2010</strong>. Reclamation of alkali and<br />
waterlogged saline lands-<strong>CSSRI</strong> technologies.<br />
In : High Level Meeting of Haryana State<br />
convened by HARSAC and HSCS & T held at<br />
Chandigarh on December, 24,.<br />
Gupta, S.K. <strong>2010</strong>. Strategies for improved water<br />
management in coastal areas for enhancing<br />
crop productivity and future perspective. In :<br />
ISCAR National Seminar held at Goa, October,<br />
27-29.<br />
Gupta, S.K., Raghubabu, M., Singh, A.K.,<br />
Balgnavi, S. and Meena, R.L. <strong>2010</strong>.<br />
Reclamation of waterlogged saline lands<br />
through subsurface drainage techniques. In :<br />
National seminar on Agricultural Sciences held<br />
at <strong>CSSRI</strong>, Karnal during April, 22-24.<br />
Jalali, V.K. and Arora, Sanjay. <strong>2010</strong>. Monitoring<br />
and mapping of salt affected soils using<br />
RS and GIS approach for reclamation in<br />
canal command of Jammu (J&K), India. In :<br />
International Conference on <strong>Soil</strong> Classification<br />
and Reclamation of Degraded Lands in Arid<br />
Environment held at ICBA, Abu Dhabi during<br />
May 17-19.<br />
Joshi, P.K., Raman, Kumar and Rajput, V.D. <strong>2010</strong>.<br />
Biosorption of Pb, Cd and Ni by fungi and<br />
bacteria from liquid medium. In : 51 st <strong>Annual</strong><br />
Conference of Association of Microbiologists<br />
of India (AMI) held at Birla Institute of<br />
Technology, Ranchi during December 14-17.<br />
131
List of publications <strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
Kamra, S.K. and Sharma, D.K. 20<strong>11</strong>. Groundwater<br />
recharge structures for small farmers in<br />
alluvial regions. In : 3 rd Ground Water Congress,<br />
organized by <strong>Central</strong> Ground Water Board,<br />
Ministry of Water Resources, Govt. of India<br />
at New Delhi, March 22- 23, pp.168- 174.<br />
Kumar, Ashok, Singh, Gurbachan and Tripathi,<br />
R.S. <strong>2010</strong>. Sudhari Gai Usar Bhumi mein<br />
Bahudhandhi Krishi Madal Dwara Adhik Labh. In<br />
: Proceedings of the National Agricultural Sciences<br />
Seminar on Satat Krishi Utpadan, Samvardhan<br />
Evam Sanrakshan hetu Prakritik Sansadhano Ka<br />
Pabandhan, organized by the Bharatiya Krishi<br />
Anusandhan Samiti and <strong>Central</strong> <strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Salinity</strong><br />
<strong>Research</strong> Institute, Karnal during 22-24 April,<br />
pp. 124-134.<br />
Kumar, Parveen, Sharma, Neeraj, Kadian,<br />
M.S., Carli, C., Pandey, S.K., Bonierbale, M.,<br />
Luthra, S.K., Schafleitner, R., Gopal, J., Singh,<br />
S.V., Singh, B.P., Rawal, S. and Kumar,<br />
Rajeev. <strong>2010</strong>. Screening of CIP clones for<br />
drought tolerance in Indo-Gangetic plains.<br />
In : Potato Agrophysiology: Proceedings of the<br />
International Symposium on Agronomy and<br />
Physiology of Potato (Mehmet Emin Caliskan<br />
and F Arslanoglu eds) held at Nevsehir,<br />
Turkey during September, 20-24, pp. 76-83,<br />
Kumar, Rajeev, Singh, B.P., Rawal, S., Kumar,<br />
Kumar, Parveen, Sukhwinder, S.V. Singh,<br />
Bandana, Kumar, Pawan, Kumar, Sanat and<br />
Saini, Neeraj. 20<strong>11</strong>. Optimizing crop geometry<br />
of cultivar Kufri Frysona under microirrigation<br />
systems for higher productivity<br />
of quality seed. In : National Consultation on<br />
Production of Disease Free Quality Planting<br />
Material Propagated through Tubers and<br />
Rhizomes held at CPRIC, Modipuram during<br />
on March 4-5, pp. 134-135.<br />
Kumar, Satyendra, Kamra, S. K., Maity, P.,<br />
Sharma J. P. and Tomar Vikas. 20<strong>11</strong>. Farmer<br />
participatory approach for augmentation<br />
of groundwater recharge. In : 45 th <strong>Annual</strong><br />
Convention of ISAE and International Symposium<br />
on Water for Agriculture held at Nagpur, India<br />
during January 17-19.<br />
Kumar, Rajeev, Kumar, Parveen, Singh, B.P.,<br />
Singh, S.V., Kumar, Dinesh, Rawal, S., Kumar,<br />
Neeraj, Kumar, Pawan, Sanat, Vineet, Vishal<br />
and Ansari, Z.A . <strong>2010</strong>. Optimization of<br />
geometry for maximization of French fry<br />
grade tuber yield of processing cultivar Kufri<br />
Frysona. In : Zonal Seminar on Physiological and<br />
Molecular Interventions for Yield and Quality<br />
Improvement in Crop Plants held at SVPUA&T<br />
Meerut (UP) during September 17-18, pp.<br />
229-230.<br />
Kumar, Rajeev; Kumar, Parveen, Singh,<br />
Sukhwinder, Singh, B.P., Kumar, Dinesh,<br />
Rawal, S., Kumar, Neeraj and Kumar,<br />
Pawan.<strong>2010</strong>. Standardizing depth of Kufri<br />
Frysona and Kufri Chipsona-1 for higher<br />
french fry grade tuber yield and better<br />
quality. In : National Symposium on Emerging<br />
Trends in Agriculture <strong>Research</strong> held at PDFSR,<br />
Modipuram during September <strong>11</strong>-12, pp.<br />
134-135.<br />
Mahanta, K.K., Khandelwal, M.K., Sarangi, S.K.<br />
and Bandyopadhyay, B.K. <strong>2010</strong>. Weather<br />
analysis for sustainable crop planning for<br />
Sundarbans region of West Bengal. In : 9 th<br />
National Symposium of Indian Society of Coastal<br />
Agricultural <strong>Research</strong> on Recent outlook on<br />
sustainable Agriculture, Livelihood Security and<br />
Ecology of Coastal Region held at Goa during<br />
October 27-30, p. 186.<br />
Mahanta, K.K., Sahoo, Bhabagrahi, and Sarangi,<br />
S.K. <strong>2010</strong>. A modified Van der Molen’s<br />
model for reclamation of saline soils. In : 9 th<br />
National Symposium of Indian Society of Coastal<br />
Agricultural <strong>Research</strong> on Recent outlook on<br />
Sustainable Agriculture, Livelihood Security and<br />
Ecology of Coastal Region held at Goa during<br />
October 27-30, pp. 62.<br />
Mandal, Subhasis, Sarangi, S.K., Burman, D.<br />
and Bandyopadhyay, B.K. <strong>2010</strong>. Production<br />
and marketing of selected vegetable crops<br />
in coastal districts of West Bengal. In : 9 th<br />
National Symposium of Indian Society of Coastal<br />
Agricultural <strong>Research</strong> on Recent outlook on<br />
Sustainable Agriculture, Livelihood Security and<br />
Ecology of Coastal Region held at Goa during<br />
October 27-30, p. <strong>11</strong>3.<br />
Mandal, A.K. <strong>2010</strong>. Assessment of salt affected<br />
soils in India using Geographic Information<br />
System. In : National Seminar on Development<br />
of <strong>Soil</strong> Science <strong>2010</strong> and the <strong>Annual</strong> Convention<br />
132
<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
List of publications<br />
of the Indian Society of <strong>Soil</strong> Science held at<br />
Indian Institute of <strong>Soil</strong> Science, Bhopal during<br />
November14-17.<br />
Mandal, A.K. <strong>2010</strong>. Computerized database on<br />
salt affected soils in India using Geographic<br />
Information System. In : National Seminar<br />
on Issues in land Resource Management: Land<br />
Degradation, Climate Change, and land Use<br />
Diversification held at NBSS&LUP, Nagpur<br />
during October 8-10.<br />
Mandal, Subhasis, Sarangi, S.K., Burman, D.<br />
and Bandyopadhyay, B.K. <strong>2010</strong>. Marketing<br />
enhancing crop production and reducing<br />
soil degradation in coastal regions of India.<br />
In : Abstracts, 9 th National Symposium of Indian<br />
Society of Coastal Agricultural <strong>Research</strong> on Recent<br />
outlook on sustainable Agriculture, Livelihood<br />
Security and Ecology of Coastal Region held at<br />
Goa during October 27-30, pp. 55.<br />
Mishra, V.K. Sharma, D.K. Shefali Srivastava,<br />
Damodaran, T. and Shahabuddin, Md. 20<strong>11</strong>.<br />
Mitigation approaches for management of<br />
terminal heat effect on wheat crop under<br />
sodic environment. In : X Agricultural Science<br />
Congress held at NBFGR, Lucknow during<br />
February 10-12, pp.276.<br />
Mishra, V.K., Shefali, Srivastava, Sharma, D.K.,<br />
Damodaran, T. and Shahabuddin, Md. <strong>2010</strong>.<br />
Potentiality of horticultural crops for carbon<br />
sequestration under sodic environment. In<br />
: Fourth International Conference on Plant and<br />
Environment Pollution held at NBRI, Lucknow<br />
during December 8-<strong>11</strong>, pp. 6.<br />
Mishra, V.K., Shrama, D.K., Shefali Srivastava,<br />
Damodaran, T., Singh, Y.P. and Nayak, A.K.<br />
and Singh, Y.P. <strong>2010</strong>. Climate Change: An<br />
increasing threat for coastal agriculture in<br />
India. In : 9 th National Symposium on Recent<br />
outlook on Sustainable Agriculture, Livelihood<br />
Security and Ecology of Coastal Region organized<br />
by Indian Society of Coastal Agricultural<br />
<strong>Research</strong>, <strong>CSSRI</strong>-RRS. Canning Town,West<br />
Bengal during October 27-30.<br />
Saini, Neeraj, Kumar, Dinesh, Kumar, Parveen,<br />
Kumar, Pawan, Rawal, S., Kumar Sanjeev<br />
and Rajeev. <strong>2010</strong>. Effect of calcium dose and<br />
time of application on processing quality of<br />
potato (Solanum tuberosum L) cultivars. In :<br />
Zonal Seminar on Physiological and Molecular<br />
Interventions for Yield and Quality Improvement<br />
in Crop Plants held at SVPUA&T Meerut (UP)<br />
during September 17-18, pp. 129.<br />
Saini, Neeraj, Kumar, Dinesh, Kumar, Parveen,<br />
Rawal, S., Kumar, Sanjeev, Kumar Pawan,<br />
Sharma, Vineet and Rajeev. <strong>2010</strong>. Effect of<br />
organic and homeopathic product on quality<br />
of potato tuber at harvest and during storage<br />
with CIPC. In : National Congress on Emerging<br />
Trends in Agriculture <strong>Research</strong> held at Meerut<br />
during September <strong>11</strong>-12, pp. 134-135.<br />
Sarangi, S.K., Bandyopadhyay, B.K. and<br />
Subhasis, Mandal. <strong>2010</strong>. Kalmisag (Ipomoea<br />
aquatica) – A green leafy vegetable having<br />
promise in the coastal salt affected soils. In<br />
: 9 th National Symposium of Indian Society of<br />
Coastal Agricultural <strong>Research</strong> on Recent outlook<br />
on Sustainable Agriculture, Livelihood Security<br />
and Ecology of Coastal Region held at Goa<br />
during October 27-30, p. 149.<br />
Sarangi, S.K., Subhasis, Mandal and Mahanta,<br />
K.K.<strong>2010</strong>. System of rice intensification (SRI)<br />
during rabi season in coastal salt-affected soils.<br />
In : 9 th National Symposium of Indian Society of<br />
Coastal Agricultural <strong>Research</strong> on Recent outlook<br />
on Sustainable Agriculture, Livelihood Security<br />
and Ecology of Coastal Region held at Goa<br />
during October 27-30, 147.<br />
Singh, S.K. 20<strong>11</strong>. Studies on different mode of<br />
aquaculture operation under three different<br />
aging pond fish culture trails of sodic land.<br />
In : X Agricultural Science Congress held at<br />
Lucknow during February 10-12 pp. 13<br />
Singh, S.R. and Verma, C. L. <strong>2010</strong>. A viscous<br />
resistance model for estimating hydraulic<br />
conductivity of soils. In : Indian National<br />
Science Academy, 76:41-52.<br />
Singh, S.V., Kadian, M.S., Patel, N.H., Luthra,<br />
S.K., Carli, C., Pandey, S.K., Kumar Dinesh,<br />
Kumar, Parveen, Sharma, Neeraj, Bonierbale,<br />
M., Gopal, J. and Singh, BP. <strong>2010</strong>. Evaluation<br />
of CIP advanced clones for hot climate in<br />
Gujarat State. In : Potato Agrophysiology:<br />
Proceedings of the International Symposium<br />
on Agronomy and Physiology of Potato held at<br />
Nevsehir, Turkey during September 20-24,<br />
pp. 84-88.<br />
133
List of publications <strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
Tripathi, R.S., <strong>2010</strong>, Bharat mein Lavan Prabhavit<br />
Bhumi Sudhar ka Samajik-Arthik Prabhav. In :<br />
National Agricultural Sciences Seminar on Satat<br />
Krishi Utpadan, Samvardhan Evam Sanrakshan<br />
hetu Prakritik Sansadhano Ka Pabandhan<br />
organized by the Bharatiya Krishi Anusandhan<br />
Samiti and <strong>Central</strong> <strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Salinity</strong> <strong>Research</strong><br />
Institute, Karnal during April 22-24, pp.<br />
67-83.<br />
Verma, C.L., Sharma, H.C., Singh, Rupinder,<br />
Kumar Sandeep and Jha, S.K. <strong>2010</strong>. Design<br />
and development of cheap filter for reuse<br />
of kitchen waste water. In : DAAD Expert<br />
Alumni Seminar on Wastewater and Waste<br />
Management in Coastal Areas Ghana, Accra<br />
held at University of Ghana, Ghana during<br />
February 5 to March 5, pp. 22.<br />
Yadav, R.K., Dagar, J.C. Khajanchi Lal, Aishwath,<br />
O.P. and Anwer, M.M. <strong>2010</strong>. <strong>Salinity</strong> tolerance<br />
of coriander, fennel and fenugreek seed<br />
spices. In : XXI AICRP Workshop & National<br />
Consultation on Seed Spices held at National<br />
<strong>Research</strong> Centre on Seed Spices, Tabiji,<br />
Ajmer, Rajasthan, during July 5-6, pp. 187.<br />
Review article<br />
Sarangi, A., Bundela, D.S., Chakraborty, S. and<br />
Wadkar, S.K. 20<strong>11</strong>. Decision Support Systems<br />
in Water Resources Management – A Review.<br />
WTC-IARI, New Delhi, India, pp.50<br />
Book<br />
Bundela, D.S., Dey, P. and Gupta, S.K. 20<strong>11</strong>.<br />
Water Management and Drainage Strategies<br />
for Irrigation Commands. <strong>Central</strong> <strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Salinity</strong><br />
<strong>Research</strong> Institute, Karnal, India, p142<br />
Burman, D., Mandal, Subhasis, Bandyopadhyay,<br />
B.K., Sarangi, S.K., Mahanta, K.K., Maji, B.<br />
<strong>2010</strong>. A glimpse of <strong>CSSRI</strong>, RRS, Canning Town,<br />
<strong>Central</strong> <strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Salinity</strong> <strong>Research</strong> Institute,<br />
Karnal, India,<br />
Sharma, D.K., Tripathi, R.S., Singh, S.K., Yadav,<br />
R.K., Meena, R.L., Gautam, R.K. <strong>2010</strong>. Krishi<br />
Kiran. <strong>Central</strong> <strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Salinity</strong> <strong>Research</strong> Institute,<br />
Karnal, India pp. 158<br />
Yadav, R.K., Meena, R.L., Jat, H.S., Singh, R.K.,<br />
Lal, Khajanchi and Gupta, S.K. <strong>2010</strong>. Use of<br />
Poor Quality Water in Agriculture. <strong>CSSRI</strong>,<br />
Karnal, MoRD, GOI, New Delhi and AARDO<br />
Secretariate, New Delhi, India, p265.<br />
Book chapter<br />
Arora, Sanjay, Hadda, M.S., Sharma, K.R. and<br />
Bhatt, R. <strong>2010</strong>. <strong>Soil</strong> moisture conservation for<br />
improving maize yields through participatory<br />
micro-watershed approach in the foothills of<br />
the Shivaliks. In : Maize for Asia: Emerging<br />
Trends and Technologies (Eds.Zaidi, P.H.,<br />
Azrai, M. and Pixley, K.V.). Mexico D.F.,<br />
CIMMYT, pp. 467-470.<br />
Bundela, D.S. and Lal, K. <strong>2010</strong>. Fluoride and<br />
nitrate pollution in ground water. In : Use of<br />
Poor Quality Water in Agriculture (Eds. Yadav,<br />
R.K., Meena, R.L., Jat, H.S., Singh, R.K., Lal,<br />
Khajanchi and Gupta, S.K.).<strong>Central</strong> <strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Salinity</strong><br />
<strong>Research</strong> Institute, Karnal, pp. 182- 190.<br />
Bundela, D.S. <strong>2010</strong>. Technologies for enhancing<br />
crop and water productivity in irrigated saline<br />
environment. In : Training Manual-Use of<br />
Geospatial Tools, Models and DSS in Enhancing<br />
Productivity of Irrigated Saline Environment<br />
(Eds. Sarangi, A., Singh D.K. and Kalra, B.S.).<br />
WTC-IARI, New Delhi, p161.<br />
Bundela, D.S. 20<strong>11</strong>. Performance evaluation<br />
of irrigation projects for sustainability. In<br />
: Water Management and Drainage Strategies<br />
for Irrigation Commands (Eds. Bundela, D.S.<br />
Dey, P. and Gupta, S.K.). <strong>Central</strong> <strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Salinity</strong><br />
<strong>Research</strong> Institute, Karnal, India, p142<br />
Chaudhary, S.K. <strong>2010</strong>. Irrigation induced soil<br />
degradation in command areas. In : Use<br />
of Poor Quality Water in Agriculture (Eds.<br />
Yadav, R.K., Meena, R.L., Jat, H.S., Singh,<br />
R.K., Lal, Khajanchi and Gupta, S.K.).<strong>Central</strong><br />
<strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Salinity</strong> <strong>Research</strong> Institute, Karnal, pp.<br />
178-181.<br />
Dey, P. <strong>2010</strong>. Gypsum/amendment requirement<br />
in sodic/saline water- A practical assessment.<br />
In : Use of Poor Quality Water in Agriculture<br />
(Eds. Yadav, R.K., Meena, R.L., Jat, H.S.,<br />
Singh, R.K., Lal, Khajanchi and Gupta, S.K.).<br />
<strong>Central</strong> <strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Salinity</strong> <strong>Research</strong> Institute,<br />
Karnal, pp. 87-91.<br />
Gupta, S.K. <strong>2010</strong>. An overview of waterlogging<br />
and soil salinity problems in three AARDO<br />
134
<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
List of publications<br />
Countries. In : Use of Poor Quality Water in<br />
Agriculture (Eds. Yadav, R.K.; Meena, R.L.;<br />
Jat, H.S.; Singh, R.K.; Lal, K. and Gupta,<br />
S.K.). <strong>Central</strong> <strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Salinity</strong> <strong>Research</strong> Institute,<br />
Karnal, pp. 1-9.<br />
Kamra, S.K. <strong>2010</strong>. Recharge and skimmingopportunities<br />
and techniques for poor quality<br />
ground water areas. In : Use of Poor Quality<br />
Water in Agriculture (Eds. Yadav, R.K., Meena,<br />
R.L., Jat, H.S., Singh, R.K., Lal, Khajanchi and<br />
Gupta, S.K.). <strong>Central</strong> <strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Salinity</strong> <strong>Research</strong><br />
Institute, Karnal, pp. 134-144.<br />
Kamra, S.K. 20<strong>11</strong>. Artificial groundwater<br />
recharge technologies for augmentation of<br />
groundwater and improvement of quality.<br />
In : Water Management and Drainage Strategies<br />
for Irrigation Commands (Eds.Bundela, D.S.,<br />
Dey, P. and Gupta, S.K.). <strong>Central</strong> <strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Salinity</strong><br />
<strong>Research</strong> Institute, Karnal, p13-21.<br />
Krishna Murthy, S.L. <strong>2010</strong>. Breeding for salt<br />
tolerance in rice. In : Use of Poor Quality Water<br />
in Agriculture (Eds. Yadav, R.K., Meena, R.L.,<br />
Jat, H.S., Singh, R.K., Lal, Khajanchi and<br />
Gupta, S.K.). <strong>Central</strong> <strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Salinity</strong> <strong>Research</strong><br />
Institute, Karnal, pp. 199-207.<br />
Kulshreshtha, N. <strong>2010</strong>. Genetic improvement for<br />
salt tolerance in wheat. In : Use of Poor Quality<br />
Water in Agriculture (Eds. Yadav, R.K., Meena,<br />
R.L., Jat, H.S., Singh, R.K., Lal, Khajanchi and<br />
Gupta, S.K.). <strong>Central</strong> <strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Salinity</strong> <strong>Research</strong><br />
Institute, Karnal, pp. 227-232.<br />
Kumar, P. and Yadav, R.K. <strong>2010</strong>. Cultivation of<br />
industrial and non-conventional crops in salt<br />
affected conditions. In : Use of Poor Quality<br />
Water in Agriculture (Eds. Yadav, R.K., Meena,<br />
R.L., Jat, H.S., Singh, R.K., Lal, Khajanchi and<br />
Gupta, S.K.). <strong>Central</strong> <strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Salinity</strong> <strong>Research</strong><br />
Institute, Karnal, pp. 98-103.<br />
Kumar, S. <strong>2010</strong>. Drip irrigation in horticultural<br />
crops : Suitability for saline water use. In :<br />
Use of Poor Quality Water in Agriculture (Eds.<br />
Yadav, R.K., Meena, R.L., Jat, H.S., Singh,<br />
R.K., Lal, Khajanchi and Gupta, S.K.). <strong>Central</strong><br />
<strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Salinity</strong> <strong>Research</strong> Institute, Karnal,<br />
pp.<strong>11</strong>7-133<br />
Lal, K. <strong>2010</strong>. Practical assessment of RSC, SAR,<br />
Adj. SAR and RNa in irrigation water. In :<br />
Use of Poor Quality Water in Agriculture (Eds.<br />
Yadav, R.K., Meena, R.L., Jat, H.S., Singh,<br />
R.K., Lal, Khajanchi and Gupta, S.K.). <strong>Central</strong><br />
<strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Salinity</strong> <strong>Research</strong> Institute, Karnal, pp.<br />
67-69<br />
Lal, K., Yadav, R. K. and Meena, R.L. <strong>2010</strong>.<br />
Characterisation of waste water for irrigation.<br />
In : Use of Poor Quality Water in Agriculture<br />
(Eds. Yadav, R.K., Meena, R.L., Jat, H.S.,<br />
Singh, R.K., Lal, Khajanchi and Gupta, S.K.).<br />
<strong>Central</strong> <strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Salinity</strong> <strong>Research</strong> Institute,<br />
Karnal, pp. 152-160.<br />
Madhu, Choudhary. <strong>2010</strong>. Bioremediation :<br />
pollution fighting tool. In : Use of Poor Quality<br />
Water in Agriculture (Eds. Yadav, R.K., Meena,<br />
R.L., Jat, H.S., Singh, R.K., Lal, Khajanchi and<br />
Gupta, S.K.). <strong>Central</strong> <strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Salinity</strong> <strong>Research</strong><br />
Institute, Karnal, pp. 233-239.<br />
Madhurama Sethi. <strong>2010</strong>. Remote sensing and<br />
GIS for waterlogged salt affected soils. In :<br />
Use of Poor Quality Water in Agriculture (Eds.<br />
Yadav, R.K.; Meena, R.L.; Jat, H.S.; Singh,<br />
R.K.; Lal, K. and Gupta, S.K.). <strong>Central</strong> <strong>Soil</strong><br />
<strong>Salinity</strong> <strong>Research</strong> Institute, Karnal pp.33-40.<br />
Mandal, A.K. <strong>2010</strong>. Geochemistry and<br />
hydrological cycles- source of origin of poor<br />
quality waters. In : Use of poor quality of water<br />
in Agriculture (Eds. Yadav, R. K., Meena, R.<br />
L., Jat, H. S., Singh, R. K., Lal, K. and Gupta,<br />
S. K.). <strong>Central</strong> <strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Salinity</strong> <strong>Research</strong> Institute,<br />
Karnal, India, p. 10-20.<br />
Mandal, A. K. <strong>2010</strong>. In-situ examination of<br />
salt affected soil profile for reclamation and<br />
management. In : Use of poor quality of water<br />
in Agriculture (Eds. Yadav, R. K., Meena, R.<br />
L., Jat, H. S., Singh, R. K., Lal, K. and Gupta,<br />
S. K.). <strong>Central</strong> <strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Salinity</strong> <strong>Research</strong> Institute,<br />
Karnal, India, p. 70-76<br />
Pandey, R.S. <strong>2010</strong>. Drip irrigation with<br />
wastewater in vegetable and fruit crops. In<br />
: Use of poor quality water in agriculture (Eds.<br />
Yadav, R.K., Meena, R.L., Jat, H.S., Singh,<br />
R.K., Lal, K., and Gupta, S.K.). <strong>Central</strong> <strong>Soil</strong><br />
<strong>Salinity</strong> <strong>Research</strong> Institute, Karnal, India, pp.<br />
191-198.<br />
Qadar, Ali. <strong>2010</strong>. Physiological attributes associated<br />
with sodicity tolerance. In : Use of Poor Quality<br />
Water in Agriculture (Eds. Yadav, R.K., Meena,<br />
R.L., Jat, H.S., Singh, R.K., Lal, Khajanchi and<br />
135
List of publications <strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
Gupta, S.K.). <strong>Central</strong> <strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Salinity</strong> <strong>Research</strong><br />
Institute, Karnal, pp. 219-226.<br />
Sarangi, S.K. and Satapathy, K.K. <strong>2010</strong>. Resource<br />
conservation technologies (RCTs): A way<br />
towards sustainable agriculture. In : Stable<br />
Food Production and Sustainable Agriculture: A<br />
Challenge Ahead in 21 st Century, (Eds. Sengar,<br />
R.S. and Sharma, A. K.). Studium Press<br />
(India) Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi. pp. 29-55.<br />
Sharma, P.C. <strong>2010</strong>. Nuclear techniques for inducing<br />
salt tolerance in crops. In : Use of Poor Quality<br />
Water in Agriculture (Eds. Yadav, R.K., Meena,<br />
R.L., Jat, H.S., Singh, R.K., Lal, Khajanchi and<br />
Gupta, S.K.). <strong>Central</strong> <strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Salinity</strong> <strong>Research</strong><br />
Institute, Karnal, pp. 208-218.<br />
Sharma, S.K. <strong>2010</strong>. Physiological mechanisms of<br />
tolerance to salinity and sodicity stresses. In :<br />
Use of Poor Quality Water in Agriculture (Eds.<br />
Yadav, R.K., Meena, R.L., Jat, H.S., Singh,<br />
R.K., Lal, Khajanchi and Gupta, S.K.). <strong>Central</strong><br />
<strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Salinity</strong> <strong>Research</strong> Institute, Karnal, pp.<br />
92-97.<br />
Sharma, S.K., Kumar, S., Phogat, V., Yadav, A.C.,<br />
Singh, A. <strong>2010</strong>. Impact of high RSC water<br />
irrigation on cultivation of vegetable crops. In<br />
: Use of Poor Quality Water in Agriculture (Eds.<br />
Yadav, R.K., Meena, R.L., Jat, H.S., Singh,<br />
R.K., Lal, Khajanchi and Gupta, S.K.). <strong>Central</strong><br />
<strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Salinity</strong> <strong>Research</strong> Institute, Karnal, pp.<br />
259-265 .<br />
Sharma, K.R. and Arora, Sanjay. <strong>2010</strong>. Runoff and<br />
soil loss as affected by different intercrops<br />
with maize in relation to productivity in the<br />
Kandi region of Jammu. In : Emerging Trends<br />
in Watershed Management (Eds. RP Yadav,<br />
AK Tewari, Pawan Sharma, Pratap Singh,<br />
Swaran Lata Arya, PK Bhat, Ram Prasad and<br />
VN Sharda). Satish Serial Publishing House,<br />
New Delhi, pp. 385-390.<br />
Singh, D., Choudhary, M.K., Meena, M.L. and<br />
Dayal, H. <strong>2010</strong>. Raising horticultural crops<br />
under saline environment. In : Use of Poor<br />
Quality Water in Agriculture (Eds. Yadav,<br />
R.K., Meena, R.L., Jat, H.S., Singh, R.K., Lal,<br />
Khajanchi and Gupta, S.K.). <strong>Central</strong> <strong>Soil</strong><br />
<strong>Salinity</strong> <strong>Research</strong> Institute, Karnal, pp. 55-66<br />
Singh, S. K. <strong>2010</strong>. Aquaculture in agriculturally<br />
poor quality of water : An integral part of<br />
natural resource management. In : Waste<br />
Water Management and Use of Poor Quality<br />
Water in Agriculture for International Training<br />
Manual for AARDO member countries :<br />
58-68<br />
Singh, S.K. <strong>2010</strong>. Aquaculture in agriculturally<br />
poor quality water: An integral component<br />
of natural resource management. In : Use of<br />
Poor Quality Water in Agriculture (Eds. Yadav,<br />
R.K., Meena, R.L., Jat, H.S., Singh, R.K.,<br />
Lal, Khajanchi and Gupta, S.K.). <strong>Central</strong><br />
<strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Salinity</strong> <strong>Research</strong> Institute, Karnal, pp.<br />
248-258.<br />
Tripathi, R.S. <strong>2010</strong>. Financial appraisal and socioeconomic<br />
benefits of sodic and saline land<br />
reclamation. In : Use of Poor Quality Water in<br />
Agriculture (Eds. Yadav, R.K., Meena, R.L.,<br />
Jat, H.S., Singh, R.K., Lal, Khajanchi and<br />
Gupta, S.K.). <strong>Central</strong> <strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Salinity</strong> <strong>Research</strong><br />
Institute, Karnal, pp. 240-247.<br />
Yadav, R.K., Jat, H.S. and Lal, Khajanchi. <strong>2010</strong>.<br />
Agro-practices for management of saline<br />
irrigation water. In : Use of Poor Quality water<br />
in Agriculture (Eds. Yadav, R.K., Meena,<br />
R. L., Jat, H.S., Singh, R.K., Lal K. and<br />
Gupta, S.K.). <strong>Central</strong> <strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Salinity</strong> <strong>Research</strong><br />
Institute, Karnal, pp. 77-86.<br />
Yadav, R.K., Jat, H.S., Meena, R.L. and Lal,<br />
Khajanchi. <strong>2010</strong>. Crop growth with high<br />
RSC irrigation water and strategies for its<br />
efficient use. In : Use of Poor Quality Water<br />
in Agriculture (Eds. Yadav, R.K., Meena,<br />
R. L., Jat, H.S., Singh, R.K., Lal K. and<br />
Gupta, S.K.). <strong>Central</strong> <strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Salinity</strong> <strong>Research</strong><br />
Institute, Karnal, pp. 161-177.<br />
Yadav, R.K. Lal, Khajanchi and Meena, R.L.<br />
<strong>2010</strong>. Wastewater use in agriculture: issues<br />
and strategies. In : Use of Poor Quality Water<br />
in Agriculture (Eds. Yadav, R. K., Meena,<br />
R. L., Jat, H. S., Singh, R. K., Lal, Khajanchi and<br />
Gupta, S. K.). <strong>Central</strong> <strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Salinity</strong> <strong>Research</strong><br />
Institute, Karnal, pp. 152-161.<br />
Yadav, R.K., Jat, H. S., Lal, Khajanchi and<br />
Meena, R. L. <strong>2010</strong>. Crop growth with high<br />
RSC irrigation water and strategies for its<br />
efficient use. In : Use of Poor Quality Water in<br />
Agriculture (Eds. Yadav, R.K., Meena, R.L.,<br />
Jat, H.S., Singh, R.K., Lal, Khajanchi and<br />
Gupta, S.K.). <strong>Central</strong> <strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Salinity</strong> <strong>Research</strong><br />
Institute, Karnal, pp. 161-177<br />
136
<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
List of publications<br />
Yaduvanshi, N.P.S. Integrated nutrient<br />
management- An option for minimizing<br />
adverse effects of RSC water irrigation. In :<br />
Use of Poor Quality Water in Agriculture (Eds.<br />
Yadav, R.K., Meena, R.L., Jat, H.S., Singh,<br />
R.K., Lal, Khajanchi and Gupta, S.K.). <strong>Central</strong><br />
<strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Salinity</strong> <strong>Research</strong> Institute, Karnal, pp.<br />
44-54.<br />
Book Edited<br />
Sharma, D.K., Tripathi, R.S., Singh, S.K., Yadav,<br />
R.K.,Meena, R.L., Gautam., R.K., <strong>2010</strong>. Krishi<br />
Kiran, pp.158.<br />
Tripathi, R.S., Modi, B.S., Goel, R.D., Dey,<br />
P., Yadav, R.K.,.Singh, S.K Menna, R.L.,<br />
Kulshrestha, N. <strong>2010</strong>. Satat Krishi Utpadan,<br />
Sambardhan evam Sarkshan hetu Prakritik<br />
Sansadhano Ka Pravandhan, pp.231.<br />
Yadav, R.K., Meena, R.L., Jat, H.S., Singh, R.K,<br />
Lal, Knajanchi and Gupta, S.K. <strong>2010</strong>. Use of<br />
Poor Quality water in Agriculture. <strong>Central</strong> <strong>Soil</strong><br />
<strong>Salinity</strong> <strong>Research</strong> Institute, Karnal, pp. 259.<br />
<strong>Research</strong> Bulletins/Folders<br />
Damodaran, T., Ahnmad, I. and Srivastava, R.C.<br />
<strong>2010</strong>. Diversity of Wild Mango (Magnifera spp.)<br />
of Andman and Nicobar islands. pp. 38.<br />
Gupta, S.K. Thripathi, R.S. Kaledhonkar, M.J.,<br />
Verma, J.P. and Lal, Mohan. 20<strong>11</strong>. Jalgrasth<br />
Lavaniye Bhumi Sudhar hetu Bhumigat Jalnikas<br />
Taknik. Revised Technical Bulletin : <strong>CSSRI</strong>/<br />
Karnal/2009/01. <strong>Central</strong> <strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Salinity</strong><br />
<strong>Research</strong> Institute, Karnal. pp. 8.<br />
Gururaja Rao, Khandelwal, M.K.,<br />
Chinchmalatpure, Anil R., Arora, Sanjay and<br />
Kamra, S.K. <strong>2010</strong>. Groundwater Recharging:<br />
an Ideal Tool for Harnessing Rain Water in<br />
Gujarat. Technical Bulletin No. <strong>CSSRI</strong>/<br />
Bharuch/<strong>2010</strong>/05, <strong>CSSRI</strong> Regional Station,<br />
Bharuch.<br />
Kamra, S.K., Kumar, Satyendra, Kaledhonkar,<br />
M.J., Yadav, R.K. Singh, S.K., Ram Ajore and<br />
Singh, Gurbachan. <strong>2010</strong>. FPARP on Enhancing<br />
Groundwater Recharge and Water Productivity in<br />
North West India. <strong>Central</strong> <strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Salinity</strong> <strong>Research</strong><br />
institute, Karnal India (Folder), pp. 3.<br />
Karpagam, C., Burman, D., Bandyopadhyay,<br />
B.K. and Bal, A.R. <strong>2010</strong>. Agriculture Based<br />
Indigenous Technical Knowledge in Sunderban<br />
Coastal Agro-ecosystem. Technical Bulletin<br />
No. <strong>CSSRI</strong>/Canning Town/<strong>2010</strong>/03. <strong>CSSRI</strong>,<br />
RRS, Canning Town.<br />
Sharma, S.K., Dagar, J.C. and Singh,<br />
Gurbachan.<strong>2010</strong>. Biosafar-biosaline (Agro.)<br />
Forestry: Remediation of Saline Wastelands<br />
through Production of Renewable Energy,<br />
Biomaterial and Fodder. Technical Bulletin No.<br />
<strong>CSSRI</strong>/Karnal/<strong>2010</strong>/04. <strong>Central</strong> <strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Salinity</strong><br />
<strong>Research</strong> Institute, Karnal, pp. 26.<br />
Sharma, S.K., Dagar, J.C. and Singh,<br />
Gurbachan.<strong>2010</strong>. <strong>Research</strong> Highlights of<br />
Biosafar Project. <strong>Central</strong> <strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Salinity</strong> <strong>Research</strong><br />
Institute, Karnal (Folder), pp. 3.<br />
Tripathi, R.S. and Sharma, D.K. 20<strong>11</strong>. Kshariya<br />
Bhumi Sudhar evam Uske Samajik–Arthik<br />
Labh. Revised Technical Bulletin : <strong>CSSRI</strong>/<br />
Karnal/2009/2. <strong>Central</strong> <strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Salinity</strong> <strong>Research</strong><br />
Institute, Karnal. pp. 12<br />
Yadav, R.K., Jat, H.S.,Tripathi, R.S. and Sharma,<br />
D.K. 20<strong>11</strong>. Krishi mein Lavaniye evam Kshariya<br />
Jal se Sinchai hetu Taknik. <strong>Central</strong> <strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Salinity</strong><br />
<strong>Research</strong> Institute, Karnal (Folder), pp. 3.<br />
Technical/Popular Articles<br />
Ajore, R. <strong>2010</strong>. Kisano ke kheto per isabgol ka safal<br />
pardarshan. Krishi Kiran. <strong>Central</strong> <strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Salinity</strong><br />
<strong>Research</strong> Institute, Karnal, 3: 105-106<br />
Anil R. Chinchmalatpure, A. K. Nayak and G.<br />
Gururaja Rao. <strong>2010</strong> Land Use Planning of the<br />
Bara tract area under Sardar Sarovar Canal<br />
Command of Gujarat. Indian Farming, 60<br />
(1):15-18.<br />
Devi, Renu, Sharma, P.C., Singh, R.K. and Dey,<br />
P. <strong>2010</strong>. Boudhik sampatti adhikar ka bharatiya<br />
parichyay. Sodh Patra Samarika: 12th Rashtriya<br />
Krishi Vigyan Samgosthi. Bhartiya Krishi<br />
Anusandhan Samiti and <strong>CSSRI</strong>, Karnal, pp.<br />
166-167.<br />
Dey, P. <strong>2010</strong>. Jalbayu parivartan avom prakitik<br />
sangsadhan prabandhan. Rajbhasa Alok,<br />
Published by Indian Council of Agricultural<br />
<strong>Research</strong>, New Delhi, Vol. 2, pp.14-20.<br />
Dey, P., Jat, H.S. and Singh, Gurbachan. <strong>2010</strong>.<br />
Jalbayu parivartan ki prishtbhumi me carbon<br />
prithakkarran tatha sudharuporant khario mrida<br />
me bhumi upoyog pronalion ka prithakkarran par<br />
probhav. Sodh Patra Smarika: 12th Rashtriya<br />
Krishi Vigyan Samgosthi. Bhartiya Krishi<br />
Anusandhan Samiti and <strong>CSSRI</strong>, Karnal, pp.<br />
90-93.<br />
137
List of publications <strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
Dey, P. and Kapila Sekhawat. <strong>2010</strong>. Bhumi mein<br />
karban prithkaran ke awsakata evam mahtav.<br />
Krishi Kiran. <strong>Central</strong> <strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Salinity</strong> <strong>Research</strong><br />
Institute, Karnal, 3: 14-17<br />
Gupta, S. K. <strong>2010</strong>. Kshariya maridao ke sudhar ki<br />
safal taknik. Kheti, 64 (8): 14-15<br />
Jat, H.S., Singh, Gurbachan and Dagar, J.C.<br />
<strong>2010</strong>. Bhahu-udhesiya krishi model- Niyamit<br />
aamdani evam rojgar ka jariya (in Hindi), Kheti,<br />
November issue, pp.25-28.<br />
Jat, H.S., Yadav, R.K. and Lal, Mohan. 20<strong>11</strong>.<br />
Sanrakshan kheti - Paaramparik kheti ka ek vikalp<br />
(in Hindi), Kheti Duniya, 2: 8-9.<br />
Kapila Sekhawat and Singh, D. <strong>2010</strong>. Khumb<br />
utpadan ke vegyanik taknik. Krishi Kiran. <strong>Central</strong><br />
<strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Salinity</strong> <strong>Research</strong> Institute, Karnal, 3: 52-56.<br />
Kiran Kumari, Lal, M. Kulshrestha, N. and<br />
Gautam, R.K. <strong>2010</strong>. Sudhari gai kshariya bhumi<br />
mein gehu ka beej utpadan khese karein. Krishi<br />
Kiran. <strong>Central</strong> <strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Salinity</strong> <strong>Research</strong> Institute,<br />
Karnal, 3: 35-39.<br />
Kumar, Ashok. <strong>2010</strong>. Samekit krishi utpadan padhti<br />
mein chara utpadan. Krishi Kiran. <strong>Central</strong> <strong>Soil</strong><br />
<strong>Salinity</strong> <strong>Research</strong> Institute, Karnal, 3: 44-46.<br />
Kumar, Ashok, Singh, Gurbachan and Tripathi,<br />
R.S. <strong>2010</strong>. Sudhari gai usar bhumi mein<br />
bahudwandi krishi model dwara adhik labh.<br />
Samarika. <strong>Central</strong> <strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Salinity</strong> <strong>Research</strong><br />
Institute, Karnal pp. 124-134.<br />
Lal, Mohan, Jat, H.S. and Yadav, R.K. 20<strong>11</strong>. Kisan<br />
gehun ka beej utpadan kaise karein? (in Hindi),<br />
8 th January, 20<strong>11</strong>, Kheti Duniya, 2: 5-6.<br />
Qadar, Ali. <strong>2010</strong>. Fasal utpadan mein jasate ka<br />
mahtav. Krishi Kiran. <strong>Central</strong> <strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Salinity</strong><br />
<strong>Research</strong> Institute, Karnal, 3: 5-9.<br />
Sarangi, S.K. <strong>2010</strong>. Management of methane<br />
emission from low land rice fields. Agrobios<br />
Newsletter IX (1): 34-35.<br />
Sarangi, S.K. <strong>2010</strong>. Reducing methane emission<br />
from rice paddies. Intensive Agriculture 49 (2):<br />
8-9.<br />
Sarangi, S.K. <strong>2010</strong>. Cultivation practices of<br />
jatropha – the biodiesel plant. Indian Farming<br />
60 (9): 18-20.<br />
Singh, Randhir, Kumar, S. <strong>2010</strong>. Kisano ke liye<br />
vardan hai poplar ki kheti. Krishi Kiran. <strong>Central</strong><br />
<strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Salinity</strong> <strong>Research</strong> Institute, Karnal, (3):<br />
82-89.<br />
Singh, S. K. and Kumar, S. <strong>2010</strong>. Machhalyo ka<br />
manav jeevan mein mahatav. Krishi Kiran.<br />
<strong>Central</strong> <strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Salinity</strong> <strong>Research</strong> Institute,<br />
Karnal, (3):73-75.<br />
Singh, S. K. and Kumar, S. <strong>2010</strong>. Machhalyo<br />
ka manav jeevan mein mahatv : Lavangrast<br />
prayavaran ke paripekshay mein. Satat Krishi<br />
Utpadan, Sambardhan Evam Sanrkshan hetu<br />
Prakritik Sansadhano Ka Prabandhan, 43 : 163<br />
Tripathi, R.S. <strong>2010</strong>. Bharat mein lavan parbhavit<br />
bhumi sudhar ka samajik arthik parbhav.<br />
Samarika. <strong>Central</strong> <strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Salinity</strong> <strong>Research</strong><br />
Institute, Karnal pp. 67-83.<br />
Tripathi, R.S. <strong>2010</strong>. Gain ka dood amrit tulya. Dood<br />
Ganga. 1:42.<br />
Verma, C.L. <strong>2010</strong>. Sinchai ki naliyo se jal risav<br />
rokane hetu plastic chadro ka satrykaran. Krishi<br />
Kiran. <strong>Central</strong> <strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Salinity</strong> <strong>Research</strong> Institute,<br />
Karnal, 3: 61-63.<br />
Verma, C.L. <strong>2010</strong>. Nadi jal sanyojan ke sambavana<br />
evam sambandhit payavarnia samashiya. Krishi<br />
Kiran. <strong>Central</strong> <strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Salinity</strong> <strong>Research</strong> Institute,<br />
Karnal, 3: 69-72.<br />
Yadav, R.K., Kumar, Ashok and Yadav, D.B.<br />
<strong>2010</strong>. Lavaniye bhumi mein chare hetu raigass<br />
ka utpadan. Krishi Kiran. <strong>Central</strong> <strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Salinity</strong><br />
<strong>Research</strong> Institute, Karnal, 3: 40-43.<br />
Yadav, R.K., Meena, R.L., Khajanchi Lal and<br />
Minhas, P.S. <strong>2010</strong>. Haryana mein mal jal dawara<br />
sinchai ki sambawnaye. Krishi Kiran, <strong>Central</strong><br />
<strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Salinity</strong> <strong>Research</strong> Institute, Karnal, pp.<br />
64-68<br />
Yadav, D.B. and Lalita Batra. <strong>2010</strong>. Vermicompost<br />
evam farm avasesh parbandhan dawara tikao kheti.<br />
Krishi Kiran. <strong>Central</strong> <strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Salinity</strong> <strong>Research</strong><br />
Institute, Karnal, 3: 18-24.<br />
Singh, S.V., Singh, B.P., Goyal, S.K. and<br />
Kumar, Parveen. <strong>2010</strong>. Alu ko chot se bhanye<br />
adik labh kamaye. Kheti. 32-36 & 36<br />
Aiswath, O.P., G. Lal, Anwar , M. M., Dagar,<br />
J. C., Yadav, R. K. and Singh, Ranvir. <strong>2010</strong>.<br />
Growing seed spices a boon in problematic<br />
areas. Indian Horticulture, September : 19-<br />
22.<br />
Yaduvanshi, N.P.S. <strong>2010</strong>. Kshariya bhumi sudhar<br />
mein press mud ka yogdan. Krishi Kiran. <strong>Central</strong><br />
<strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Salinity</strong> <strong>Research</strong> Institute, Karnal, 3:<br />
1-4.<br />
138
<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
PARTICIPATION IN CONFERENCE/SEMINAR/<br />
SYMPOSIUM/WORKSHOPS<br />
Name Title Period<br />
S.K.Chaudhari XII All India Engineers’ Conference – <strong>2010</strong>, Nagpur April 5-9, <strong>2010</strong><br />
S.K. Gupta<br />
Satyendra Kumar<br />
Pradip Dey<br />
R.S. Tripathi<br />
S.K. Singh<br />
R.L. Meena<br />
R.K. Yadav<br />
Participated in National Seminar on Agricultural Sciences,<br />
<strong>CSSRI</strong>, Karnal<br />
Rashtriya Krishi Vigyan Sangoshti Satat Krishi Utpadan<br />
Samvardan evam Sanrakshan hetu Prakritik Sansadhano ka<br />
Sanrakshan held at <strong>CSSRI</strong>, Karnal<br />
April 22-24, <strong>2010</strong><br />
April 22-24, <strong>2010</strong><br />
D.S. Bundela National Meet on Technological Innovations in Agriculture May 21-22, <strong>2010</strong><br />
held at NASC Complex, New Delhi<br />
S.K. Gupta <strong>Annual</strong> meeting of NAAS, New Delhi June 4-5, <strong>2010</strong><br />
T. Damodaran National Symposium on Mango Biodiversity at CISH,<br />
Lucknow<br />
June 23-25, <strong>2010</strong><br />
D.S. Bundela NAIP M&E Workshop held at NAARM, Hyderabad July 5-6, <strong>2010</strong><br />
R.K. Yadav<br />
P.C. Sharma<br />
N. Kulshreshtha<br />
D.S. Bundela<br />
P.C. Sharma<br />
S.L. Krishna Murthi<br />
P.C. Sharma<br />
S.L. Krishna Murthi<br />
XXI AICRP Workshop & National Consultation on Seed<br />
Spices held at National <strong>Research</strong> Centre on Seed Spices,<br />
Tabiji, P.O. Saradhana, Ajmer<br />
Participated in ICAR-Industry meeting held at NASC, New<br />
Delhi<br />
Executive Seminar Series on Geospatial Technology, held at<br />
Chandigarh<br />
Participated in XVII <strong>Annual</strong> Group meeting of AICRP<br />
(Rapeseed and Mustard) held at Devi Ahilya Agricultural<br />
University, Gwalior<br />
Participated in CSISA Experimental Platform Progress-cumhealth<br />
training meet held at <strong>CSSRI</strong>, Karnal<br />
Participated in the workshop on Global Plan of Action for<br />
Conservation and Sustainable Utilization of Plant Genetic<br />
Resources for Food and Agriculture” organized by National<br />
Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources, New Delhi<br />
July 5-6, <strong>2010</strong><br />
July 28-29, <strong>2010</strong><br />
August 26, <strong>2010</strong><br />
September 1-3, <strong>2010</strong><br />
September14-16,<br />
<strong>2010</strong><br />
September 30, 20<br />
B.K. Bandyopadhyay<br />
D. Burman<br />
Subhasis Mandal<br />
D.S. Bundela<br />
Handholding PMTS Workshop of NAIP at ICAR Complex<br />
for NEH Region, Barapani<br />
NAIP Workshop of Component-1 Projects held at NASC<br />
Complex, New Delhi<br />
October 7-8, <strong>2010</strong><br />
October 19-20, <strong>2010</strong><br />
139
Participation in conference/seminar/ symposium/workshops <strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
S.K. Gupta<br />
B.K. Bandyopadhyay<br />
A.R. Bal<br />
D.Burman<br />
S.K. Sarangi<br />
K.K. Mahanta<br />
S. Mandal<br />
Sanjay Arora<br />
9 th National Symposium on Recent Outlook on Sustainable<br />
Agriculture, Livelihood Security and Ecology of Coastal<br />
Region, organized by Indian Society of Coastal Agricultural<br />
<strong>Research</strong>, at Calangute, Goa.<br />
National Conference on Watershed Management on Sloping<br />
Lands for Environment & Livelihood Security, SCSI,<br />
Shillong.<br />
October 27-30, <strong>2010</strong><br />
November <strong>11</strong>-13,<br />
<strong>2010</strong><br />
D.S. Bundela ESRI’s Geovision Seminar held at New Delhi November 12, <strong>2010</strong><br />
S.K. Gupta<br />
75 th <strong>Annual</strong> Convention of Indian Society of <strong>Soil</strong> Science,<br />
Bhopal<br />
November 14-16,<br />
<strong>2010</strong><br />
P. Dey 2nd International Exhibition and conference on scientific,<br />
bio-technology, analytical and lab technology and India lab<br />
expo held at New Delhi<br />
December<strong>11</strong>, <strong>2010</strong><br />
S.K. Gupta<br />
S.K. Kamra<br />
Pragati Maity<br />
Brain Storming on 2 nd Green Revolution –Technologies for<br />
Eastern India, Patna<br />
Indo-Canadian Workshop on Adaptive and Sustainable<br />
Solutions for Water Integrity, Safety, Security and Supply’ at<br />
Chandigarh<br />
December14-15, <strong>2010</strong><br />
January 7-8, 20<strong>11</strong><br />
R.S. Pandey<br />
45 th <strong>Annual</strong> Convention of Indian Society of Agricultural<br />
Engineering and International Symposium on Water for<br />
Agriculture, Nagpur<br />
January 17-19, 20<strong>11</strong><br />
S.K. Chaudhari <strong>Soil</strong> health, sustainability and food security,Dapoli January 21-22, 20<strong>11</strong><br />
V.K. Mishra<br />
C.L. Verma<br />
T. Damodaran<br />
Xth Agricultural Science Congress at NBFGR, Lucknow February 10-12, 20<strong>11</strong><br />
B. Maji<br />
B.K. Bandyopadhyay<br />
D. Burman<br />
S.K. Sarangi<br />
K.K. Mahanta<br />
S. Mandal<br />
D.S. Bundela<br />
Pradip Dey<br />
S.K. Kamra<br />
Status and Innovations of Farm to Market linkages - A<br />
special reference to Coastal agriculture held at Chandkhali<br />
Village of Taldi (Canning I block).<br />
Regional Workshop on Groundwater <strong>Salinity</strong>: Assessment,<br />
Management and Mitigation held at <strong>CSSRI</strong>, Karnal<br />
3 rd Ground Water Congress, organized by <strong>Central</strong> Ground<br />
Water Board, Govt. of India at New Delhi, and presented a<br />
paper entitled ‘Groundwater Recharge Structures for Small<br />
farmers in Alluvial Regions’.<br />
February 15, 20<strong>11</strong><br />
March 18-19, 20<strong>11</strong><br />
March 22- 23, 20<strong>11</strong><br />
<br />
140
<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
LIST OF ON GOING PROJECTS<br />
Priority area - Data Base on Salt Affected <strong>Soil</strong>s<br />
and Poor Quality Waters<br />
1 P1-2005/DBR2.7-ISR-F24.Mapping<br />
salt-affected and waterlogged soils in<br />
Rohtak, Jhajjar and Bhiwani districts<br />
of Haryana using remote sensing and<br />
GIS (Madhurama Sethi, S.K. Gupta,<br />
M. L. Khurana, Parvesh Chandna and<br />
D.S. Bundela )<br />
2 P1-2007/DBR 2.8-ISR-F24. Digital<br />
database on salt affected soils using GIS.<br />
(A.K. Mandal)<br />
3 P1-2009/DBR 3.0-ISR-F10/F26/4230.<br />
Impact of changing trend in weather, soil<br />
and water parameters on crop productivity<br />
in fresh and saline groundwater zones<br />
in Haryana.(Pragati Maity, Satyendra<br />
Kumar, D.S. Budela and S.K. Kamra)<br />
Priority Area - Reclamation and Management<br />
of Alkali <strong>Soil</strong>s<br />
4 P 1 - 9 0 / A S M A 1 . 1 3 - I S R - F 2 0 / F 2 5 /<br />
0010. Integrated nutrient supply and<br />
management system for sustainable<br />
crop production in alkali soils. (N.P.S.<br />
Yaduvanshi and S.K. Chaudhari)<br />
5 P1-2005/ASM3.4-ISR-A00/P00/F27.<br />
Studies on multi-enterprise agriculture<br />
on reclaimed sodic lands for sustaining<br />
livelihood (J.C. Dagar, H.S. Jat, R.S.<br />
Tripathi, N.P.S. Yaduvanshi, R.S. Pandey,<br />
S.K. Singh, S.S. Kundu (NDRI) and N.S.<br />
Sirohi (NDRI)<br />
6 P1-2005/ASM3.5-ISR-A00/P00/F27.<br />
Evaluation of resource conservation<br />
technologies in rice-wheat cropping<br />
system. (Ranbir Singh, P.K. Joshi, R.S.<br />
Tripathi, P. Dey and S.K. Chaudhari)<br />
7 P 1 - 2 0 0 7 / A S M 3 . 8 - I S R - E 0 0 / 0 1 5 0 /<br />
018/0338. Socio-economic impact<br />
assessment of salt tolerant varieties<br />
developed by <strong>CSSRI</strong>. (R.S. Tripathi,<br />
Ali Qadar, N. Kulshreshtha and P.C.<br />
Sharma)<br />
8 P1-2008/ASM3.9-ISR-COO/F26/F28.<br />
Diagnosis, definition and interventions<br />
for salt affected soils in Indo-Gangetic<br />
plains using participatory appraisal.<br />
(Ex Officio Director) –facilitator, R.K.<br />
Yadav, Neeraj Kulshreshtha, Sharad<br />
Kumar Singh, Satyendra Kumar, J.C.<br />
Dagar and Khajanchi Lal)<br />
9 P1-2008/ ASM4.0-ISR-F22/ 0010. Effect<br />
of different land-use system on carbon<br />
sequestration, soil physico-chemical<br />
properties and capacity of these soils for<br />
sustaining crop growth under reclaimed<br />
sodic soil. (Pradip Dey, H.S. Jat Anil<br />
Chinchmalatpure and D. Burman)<br />
10 P1-2009/ ASM4.2-ISR-C00/ K10. Socio<br />
economic impact of tree plantations on<br />
farmers and community lands in salt<br />
affected and reclaimed soils of Haryana.<br />
(Ranjay Kumar Singh and C.B. Pandey)<br />
<strong>11</strong> P1-2009/ ASM4.3-ISR-A00/ F27/ 0120/<br />
0180. Efficient use of organic waste<br />
material as mulching in maze-wheat<br />
cropping system in reclaimed sodic soils.<br />
(H.S. Jat, and Ranbir Singh)<br />
12 P1-2009/ASM4.4-ISR-E10.Economic<br />
impact assessment of zero tillage<br />
technology. (R.S. Tripathi)<br />
Priority Area - Management of Marginal<br />
Quality Waters<br />
13 P1-2006/WQM4.0-ISR-F21/P10/3854.<br />
Recycling of organic farm wastes for<br />
compost production and its utilization<br />
for crop production under sodic water<br />
irrigated conditions. (Lalita Batra)<br />
14 P1-2006/WQM4.1-ISR-P12/3860/ 0600.<br />
Performance study of sub-surface microirrigation<br />
for horticultural crops (fruits)<br />
141
List of on going projects <strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
using domestic wastewater (R.S. Pandey,<br />
Lalita Batra, S.K. Gupta and Ali Qadar)<br />
15 P 1 - 2 0 0 6 / W Q M 4 . 2 - I S R - U 2 0 / P 1 0 /<br />
A00/3862. Developing a spatial decision<br />
support system for suggesting the<br />
suitability of contaminated groundwater<br />
for irrigation and its effects on agriculture<br />
and Public Health in Haryana (D.S.<br />
Bundela, K. Lal, M. Sethi, Mahathi<br />
Parkash, S.K. Kamra, S.K. Gupta and R.K.<br />
Yadav)<br />
16 P1-2007/WQM4.4-ISR-A00/3850/<br />
0120/0180. Organic input management<br />
option with saline water irrigation for<br />
sustaining productivity of high value<br />
crops. (R.L. Meena, S.K. Gupta, Vinod<br />
Phogot (AICRP, Hisar Centre)<br />
17 P1-2008/WQM 4.7-ISR-M10. Productive<br />
utilization of inland sodic/saline soil and<br />
water for aquaculture. (Sharad Kumar<br />
Singh)<br />
18 P 1 - 2 0 0 8 / W Q M 4 . 8 - I S R - P 1 0 / 4 6 3 0 .<br />
Integrated filtering system for artificial<br />
groundwater recharge. (Satyendra<br />
Kumar, S.K. Kamra and R.K. Yadav )<br />
19 P 1 - 2 0 0 9 / W Q M 4 . 9 - I S R - P 1 0 / 3 8 6 0 .<br />
Wastewater use in non-food crops.<br />
(Khajanchi Lal, R.K. Yadav, P.Dey,<br />
D.S. Bundela, S.K. Chaudhari, Madhu<br />
Chaudhary and J.C. Dagar )<br />
20 P 1 - 2 0 1 0 / W Q M 5 . 0 - I S R - T 0 0 / 3 8 6 0 .<br />
Isolation and characterization of arsenic<br />
tolerant microbes. (Madhu Choudhary,<br />
P.K. Joshi and N.P.S. Yaduvanshi)<br />
Priority Area - Crop Improvement for <strong>Salinity</strong>,<br />
Alkalinity and Waterlogging Stresses<br />
21 P 1 - 2 0 0 6 / C I S A 3 . 4 - I S R - F 3 0 / 0 1 8 0 .<br />
Incorporation of salt tolerance in wheat<br />
through induced mutagenesis. (Neeraj<br />
Kulshershtha and P.C. Sharma)<br />
22 P1-2006/CISA3.5-ISR-F60/F30/0338.<br />
Development of salt tolerant high<br />
yielding genotypes of Indian Mustard<br />
(Brassica juncea) (P.C. Sharma and S.L.<br />
Krishnamurthy)<br />
23 P1-2007/ CIS3.9-ISR-F30/ F60/ 0180.<br />
Genetic improvement of wheat<br />
germplasm for salinity, sodicity<br />
and waterlogging stresses. (Neeraj<br />
Kulshreshtha, S.K. Sharma, and G.G<br />
Rao)<br />
24 P1-2009/CIS4.5-ISR-F60/0180/3800.<br />
Search for wheat materials tolerant to<br />
both sodicity and zinc deficiency stresses.<br />
(Ali Qadar and Neeraj Kulshreshtha)<br />
25 P1-2009/ CIS4.6-ISR-F30/ 0150. Genetic<br />
improvement of rice for salt tolerance<br />
(S.L. Krishnamurthi, Ali Qadar and<br />
P. Dey)<br />
Priority Area - Agroforestry in Salt Affected<br />
<strong>Soil</strong>s<br />
26 P1-2006/AFS3.0-ISR-K00/P05/0390.<br />
Biomass and Bio-diesel for energy<br />
production from salt affected land. (S.K.<br />
Sharma, N.P.S. Yaduvanshi, G.G. Rao,<br />
Y.P. Singh, B.K. Bandyopadhyay, J.C.<br />
Dagar, D.K. Sharma, D. Burman, and<br />
A.R. Chinchmalatpure)<br />
27 P 1 - 2 0 0 7 / A F S 3 . 3 - I S R - A 0 0 / K 0 0 /<br />
K10. Evaluation of different biosaline<br />
agroforestry systems for dry regions. (J.C.<br />
Dagar, Khajanchi. Lal and C.B. Pandy)<br />
28 P 1 - 2 0 0 7 / A F S 3 . 4 - I S R - A 0 0 / K 0 0 .<br />
Evaluation of Cactus and Prosopis for<br />
arid biosaline agroforestry. (J.C. Dagar,<br />
Khajanchi Lal, and T. Damodaran)<br />
29 Biomass accumulation and carbon<br />
sequestration of mesquit based forestry<br />
system on semi reclaimed alkali soils.<br />
(C.B. Pandey)<br />
30 P1-2009/AFS3.5-ISR-K00/F25/F27. Treesoil-crop<br />
relations vis-a-vis soil fertility<br />
and crop productivity in sodic soils. (C.B.<br />
Pandey, S.K. Chaudhari, and J.C. Dagar)<br />
142
<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
List of on going projects<br />
31 P1-2009/AFS3.6-ISR-K20. Effect of water<br />
and salinity stress on the performance of<br />
tree species. (S.K. Chaudhari, C.B. Pandey<br />
and J.C. Dagar)<br />
Priority Area - Reclamation and Management<br />
of Coastal Saline <strong>Soil</strong>s<br />
32 P1-2005/CSM3.1-ISR-K00/K10. Effect<br />
of waterlogging on tree species for<br />
agroforestry system in coastal salt affected<br />
soils. (D. Burman B.K. Bandyopadhyay<br />
and A.R. Bal)<br />
33 P 1 - 2 0 0 7 / C S M 3 . 3 - I S R - F 2 7 / P 1 0 /<br />
0010/8145. Use of available brackish<br />
and fresh water in the coastal area for<br />
integrated cultivation of crops and fishes.<br />
(B.K. Bandyopadhyay, D. Burman, A.R.<br />
Bal, S. Sarangi, Subhasis Mandal and<br />
P. Chatterjee (Fisheries) from KVK,<br />
Nimpith)<br />
34 P 1 - 2 0 0 9 / C S M 3 . 4 - I S R - P 1 0 / 4 6 3 0 .<br />
Exploration of artificial groundwater<br />
recharge of fresh water aquifers in coastal<br />
regions of West Bengal (K.K. Mahanta,<br />
S.K. Kamra, S.Kumar and D.Burman)<br />
35 P 1 - 2 0 0 9 / C S M 3 . 5 - I S R - F 2 7 / 0 0 1 0 .<br />
Assessment of salt affected soils and<br />
cropping pattern of coastal West Bengal,<br />
Orissa and Andhra Pradesh. (S.K. Sarangi,<br />
K. K. Mahanta, Subhasis Mandal and one<br />
scientist H.Q. (<strong>Soil</strong> Survey)<br />
36 P 1 - 2 0 0 9 / C S M 3 . 6 - E 1 0 / E 5 0 . S o c i o -<br />
economic impact of improved<br />
technologies in the coastal areas of West<br />
Bengal. (Subhasis Mandal, S.K. Sarangi<br />
and D.Burman)<br />
Priority Area - Reclamation and Management<br />
of Salt Affected Vertisols<br />
37 P1-2005/SMV3.2-ISR-A00/P00/F26/<br />
F27. Integrated farming system approach<br />
for optimizing production from saline<br />
black soils. (G.G. Rao, M. K. Khandelwal,<br />
A.R. Chinchmalatpure and Sanjay<br />
Arora)<br />
38 P1-2006/SMV3.4-ISR-A00/P05/0390.<br />
Salt tolerance of Jatropha curcas (G.G.<br />
Rao, Anil R. Chinchmalatpure, M.K.<br />
Khandelwal, R.L. Meena and M.P.<br />
Reedy)<br />
39 P1-2006/SMV3.5-ISR-P10/4630. Design,<br />
development and management of surface<br />
drainage system for crop production at<br />
Samni farm. (M.K. Khandelwal, A.R.<br />
Chinchmalatpure and S. K. Kamra )<br />
40 P1-2006/SMV3.6-ISR-F27/F22/E50.<br />
Studies on the effect of Sardar Sarovar<br />
canal irrigation on properties of vertisols,<br />
cropping pattern and socio-economic<br />
status of farmers in the Bara Tract area of<br />
Gujarat state. (Anil. R. Chinchmalatpure,<br />
Sanjay Arora, R.K. Singh and H.S. Jat)<br />
41 P1-2009/SMV3.7-ISR-C00/F20/P20.<br />
Management of coastal saline soils of<br />
saurashtra, Gujarat-Impact studies on<br />
technological interventions (G. Gururaja<br />
Rao, Anil R. Chinchmalatpure, Sanjay<br />
Arora and M.K. Khandelwal)<br />
42 P1-2009/SMV3.8-ISR-F21/3930.Bioremediation<br />
of coastal and inland salt<br />
affected soils using halophytic plants and<br />
halophilic soil microbes (Sanjay Arora<br />
and Anil R. Chinchmalatpure, Scientist<br />
from other institute/centre)<br />
Priority Area - Reclamation and Management<br />
of Alkali <strong>Soil</strong>s of <strong>Central</strong> and Eastern Gangetic<br />
Plains<br />
43 P1-2005/EGSM1.1-ISR-A00/F26/<br />
F27/0150/0180. Resource conservation<br />
for rice-wheat cropping system through<br />
intervention of tillage and crop residue<br />
management in partially reclaimed indogangatic<br />
sodic soil. (V.K. Mishra, Y.P.<br />
Singh, Ranbir Singh, and D.K. Sharma)<br />
44 P1-2005/EGSM1.2-ISR-A00/P00/ F26/<br />
F27. Land modifications for increasing<br />
water productivity by different farming<br />
systems in waterlogged sodic soils along<br />
the sarda sahayak canal command of<br />
143
List of on going projects <strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
U.P. (D.K. Sharma, Y.P. Singh, V.K.<br />
Mishra, C.L. Verma and V.K. Varshney<br />
(Sr. Scientist, Fisheries))<br />
45 P1-2007/EGSM1.8-ISR-F26/P10/A00.<br />
Performance of Prosopis species under<br />
different amendments and in-situ rain<br />
water harvesting technique on sodic soils.<br />
(Y.P. Singh and D.K. Sharma)<br />
46 P1-2008/EGSM1.9-ISR-F30/<strong>11</strong>00/ <strong>11</strong>12.<br />
Identification of genotypes in cactus,<br />
banana and aonla for tolerance to sodicity<br />
and standardization of management<br />
practices for economic livelihood in<br />
the resource poor sodic lands. (T.<br />
Damodaran, D.K. Sharma, Chhedi Lal,<br />
V.K. Mishra and Hort. Scientist from<br />
CISTH Lucknow)<br />
47 P1-2008/EGSM2.0-ISR-F05/P10. Study<br />
on salt and water dynamics and crop<br />
performance in waterlogged sodic soils<br />
under raised and sunken beds. (Chhedi<br />
Lal, Y.P. Singh, T. Damodaran and<br />
Scientist from Fishery centre Lucknow)<br />
List of Externally Funded <strong>Research</strong> Projects<br />
<strong>2010</strong>-20<strong>11</strong><br />
1 F<strong>11</strong>-2007/DBR2.9/ISR-F24.Nationwide<br />
mapping of land degradation using<br />
multi-temporal satellite data. Sub-project:<br />
Mapping and characterization of salt<br />
affected soils in Haryana using remote<br />
sensing (A.K. Mandal)<br />
2 Development of spectral reflectance<br />
methods and low cost sensors for realtime<br />
application of variable rate inputs in<br />
precision farming. (Madhurama Sethi)<br />
3 C2-2009/ ASM4.1-ISR-A00/ P00/ F27.<br />
Cereal system initiative for South Asia<br />
– Objective 2 component (P.C. Sharma,<br />
N.P.S. Yaduvanshi and H.S. Jat)<br />
4 P 2 - 2 0 0 4 / D I P 2 . 6 - I S R - P 1 0 / P 1 2 .<br />
Monitoring and Evaluation of large scale<br />
drainage projects in the state of Haryana.<br />
(S.K. Gupta and R.S. Tripathi)<br />
5 C2-2006/WQM4.3-ISR-P10/4630.<br />
Farmer’s participatory research on<br />
enhancing groundwater recharge and<br />
water productivity in North-West India.<br />
(S.K. Kamra, Pragati Maiti, R.K. Yadav,<br />
G.G. Rao, D.K. Sharma, Sharad Kumar<br />
Singh and Satyendra Kumar)<br />
6 C 2 - 2 0 0 7 / W Q M 4 . 6 - I S R - P 1 0 / T 0 0 /<br />
3860/3930. Microbial bioremediation of<br />
wastewater for heavy metals. (P.K. Joshi<br />
and Lalita Batra)<br />
7 C2-2006/CIS3.6-ISR-F30/F26/0150.<br />
National project on transgenics in crops.<br />
(Functional Genomics component)<br />
salinity tolerance in rice. (S.L.<br />
Krishnamurthy and S.K. Sharma)<br />
8 C 2 - 2 0 0 6 / C I S 3 . 7 - I S R - F 3 0 - 0 1 5 0 .<br />
Development and evaluation of salt<br />
tolerant transgenic rice. (S.K. Sharma and<br />
S.L. Krishnamurthy)<br />
9 C 2 - 2 0 0 8 / C I S 4 . 1 - I S R - F 3 0 / 0 1 8 0 .<br />
Multilocation evaluation of bread wheat<br />
germplasm (Neeraj Kulshreshtha)<br />
10 F 1 1 - 2 0 0 8 / C I S 4 . 2 - I S R - F 3 0 / 0 1 5 0 .<br />
Enhancing and stabilizing the<br />
productivity of salt affected areas by<br />
incorporating genes for tolerance of<br />
abiotic stresses in rice. (Team leader:<br />
(Ex Officio Director), Ali Qadar, D.K.<br />
Sharma, Y.P. Singh, T. Damodran, B.K.<br />
Bandyopadhyay, D. Burman, S.K. Sarangi<br />
and S. Mondal)<br />
<strong>11</strong> F<strong>11</strong>-2008/CIS4.3-ISR-F30/0150/S00.<br />
Stress tolerant rice for poor farmers in<br />
Africa and South Asia. (Team leader:<br />
(Ex Officio Director), S.K. Sharma,<br />
S.L. Krishnamurthi, D.K. Sharma, Y.P.<br />
Singh, V.K. Mishra, C.L. Verma, B.K.<br />
Bandyopadhyay, D. Burman, A.R. Bal,<br />
S.K. Sarangi and S. Mondal)<br />
12 Improvement of wheat for salt tolerance<br />
using molecular approach. (Neeraj<br />
Kulshreshtha, P.C. Sharma and S.K.<br />
Sharma)<br />
144
<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
List of on going projects<br />
13 Establishment of National Database<br />
on rice. (S.K. Sharma and S.L.<br />
Krishnamurthy)<br />
14 C2-2006/AFS3.1-ISR-K10/P10. Control<br />
of waterlogging and salinity through<br />
agroforestry interventions. (J.C. Dagar,<br />
Khajanchi Lal and S.K. Chaudhari)<br />
15 F<strong>11</strong>-2007/AFS3.2-ISR-K00/P05/ 8951.<br />
BIOSAFOR “Biosaline (agro) forestry<br />
remediation of saline wastelands<br />
through production of renewable energy,<br />
biomaterials and fodder”. (S.K. Sharma<br />
and J.C. Dagar)<br />
16 Strategies for sustainable management<br />
of degraded coastal land and water for<br />
enhancing livelihood security of farming<br />
communities. (B.K. Bandhyopadhyay, D.<br />
Burman, A.R. Bal, S.K. Sarangi, S. Mandal,<br />
K.K. Mahanta and S.K. Gupta)<br />
Externally Funded<br />
1. Intellectual property management<br />
transfer/commercialization<br />
of<br />
agricultural technologies. (S.K. Sharma,<br />
P. Dey, Neeraj Kulshrestha and D.S.<br />
Bundela)<br />
2. Decision support system for enhancing<br />
productivity in irrigated saline<br />
environment using remote sensing,<br />
modelling and GIS (D.S. Bundela, S.K.<br />
Gupta, N.P.S. Yadhuvanshi, Madhurama<br />
Sethi, R.L. Meena and R.S. Tripathi)<br />
3. Wheat improvement for waterlogging,<br />
salinity and element toxicities in Australia<br />
and India. (Neeraj Kulshreshtha, S.K.<br />
Sharma and N.P.S. Yaduvanshi)<br />
4. Estimating marketing efficiency of major<br />
horticultural commodities in coastal<br />
districts of West Bengal. (Subhasis<br />
Mandal, B.K. Bandyopadhyay, D.<br />
Burman, S.K. Sarangi and A. R. Bal)<br />
5. Holistic approach for improving<br />
livelihood security through livestock<br />
based farming system in Barabanki and<br />
Raebareli district of U.P. (T. Damodaran,<br />
D.K. Sharma and V.K. Mishra)<br />
6. Impact assessment of climate change<br />
on crop production under salt affected<br />
environment of Uttar Pradesh (V.K.<br />
Mishra, Y.P. Singh, D.K. Sharma and T.<br />
Damodaran).<br />
Inter-Institutional Collaborative Projects<br />
1 Salt tolerance studies in major seed<br />
spices crops. (J.C. Dagar and M. Sethi) in<br />
collaboration with NRC on Seed Spices,<br />
Ajmer (Rajasthan)<br />
2 Studies on salt tolerance of sweet potato.<br />
(D. Burman) in collaboration with<br />
Regional Centre CTCRI, Bhubaneshwar<br />
(Orissa)<br />
<br />
145
<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
COSULTANCIES, PATENTS AND COMMERCIALISATION OF<br />
TECHNOLOGIES<br />
• Subsurface drainage for heavy soils of<br />
Maharashtra (S.K. Gupta)<br />
(Funding : Rex-Poly Extrusion Pvt. Ltd., Sangli,<br />
Maharashtra)<br />
• Feasiability study using biological sludge<br />
from Nitro-ETP Plant and treated effluent<br />
from environmental control unit 1 of GNFC<br />
for crop production on vertisols (G.G.Rao)<br />
(Funding : The Gujarat Narmada Valley<br />
Fertiliser Co. Ltd., Narmada Nagar, Bharuch,<br />
Gujarat)<br />
• Feasiability studies on the use of treated<br />
effluent from Aniline-TDI Plant of GNFC<br />
Unit-<strong>11</strong> in diverse crop interventions on<br />
vertisols (G.G.Rao)<br />
(Funding : The Gujarat Narmada Valley<br />
Fertiliser Co. Ltd., Narmada Nagar, Bharuch,<br />
Gujarat)<br />
<br />
146
<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
INSTITUTIONAL ACTIVITY<br />
<strong>Research</strong> Advisory Committee Meeting<br />
The first meeting of the newly constituted<br />
<strong>Research</strong> Advisory Committee (RAC) of the<br />
Institute was held at <strong>CSSRI</strong>, Karnal under the<br />
chairmanship of Dr. Pratap Narain from October<br />
22-23, <strong>2010</strong>. The other members who attended<br />
the meeting included Dr. T.N. Chaudhary, Dr.<br />
P.K. Joshi, Dr. K.V.G.K. Rao, Dr. P.S. Pathak,<br />
Dr. D.K. Sharma, Sh. M.S. Mehla (Progressive<br />
farmer) and Dr. P. Dey. Dr. S.K. Gupta, PC<br />
(SSW), Dr. S.K. Sharma, HDCI, Dr. J.C. Dagar,<br />
HSCM, Dr. S.K. Kamra, HDIDE and Dr. R.S.<br />
Tripathi, Head, HTET were also present.<br />
Dr. D.K. Sharma, Director welcomed the<br />
Chairman and the members of the committee<br />
and presented the progress report of the Institute.<br />
After reviewing the Action Taken <strong>Report</strong>, a<br />
discussion was held with all the Heads of the<br />
Divisions. Based on the discussion, following<br />
important researchable issues were crystallized<br />
to be addressed in future.<br />
• Mapping and characterization of salt affected<br />
soils should aim towards identification of<br />
researchable issues and setting up of priorities<br />
and change detection in spatial context.<br />
• Guidelines should be established for<br />
management of salt affected soils in ecoregional<br />
context and for allocating resources<br />
for research and development<br />
• Multi-enterprise model studies should be<br />
focused on major enterprises in the context<br />
of agro-social conditions.<br />
• Monitoring and evaluation of reclamation<br />
technologies needs to be carried out in time<br />
phases<br />
Meeting of research advisory committee in progress<br />
• <strong>Research</strong> should focus on development of<br />
technologies for ground water recharge<br />
under saline environment and for transfer<br />
of technologies to state agencies for large<br />
scale adoption.<br />
• Drainage research particularly with respect<br />
to subsurface drainage should be included<br />
in core area, keeping in view the drainage<br />
requirement of various states including<br />
Maharashtra, Haryana and Punjab.<br />
• Water management particularly with<br />
respect to poor quality waters (saline water,<br />
sewerage and industrial effluents) needs<br />
strengthening. Bioremediation and Phytoremediation<br />
measures for managing poor<br />
quality water need to be developed.<br />
Staff <strong>Research</strong> Council Meeting<br />
The Staff <strong>Research</strong> Council (SRC) meeting was<br />
held from December 6-10, <strong>2010</strong> to review the<br />
progress of the ongoing research programme<br />
and to take up new research project proposals at<br />
the main institute, and its three regional research<br />
stations at Canning Town (West Bengal),<br />
Bharuch (Gujarat) and Lucknow (U.P.). At the<br />
start of the proceedings, the house observed two<br />
minutes silence in the memory of Late Dr. (Mrs.)<br />
Lalita Batra, Ex-Principal Scientist of Division of<br />
<strong>Soil</strong> and Crop Management, <strong>CSSRI</strong>, Karnal who<br />
expired on 29.10.<strong>2010</strong>. In his opening remarks,<br />
the Chairman Dr. D.K Sharma highlighted<br />
several important issues related to soil salinity,<br />
water quality and climate change. The Chairman<br />
also mentioned about the achievements of <strong>CSSRI</strong><br />
during last one year and congratulated all staff<br />
members for their contribution in securing<br />
Sardar Patel Outstanding Institution Award of<br />
ICAR.<br />
The Chairman urged that the Scientists<br />
should formulate new projects focusing the<br />
newly acquired Nain Farm in order to tackle<br />
complex problems of salinity management.<br />
The Chairman also urged the scientists to refer<br />
the recommendation of <strong>Research</strong> Advisory<br />
Committee for formulating new projects. The<br />
147
Institutional activity <strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
scientists were advised to strictly follow the<br />
time schedule of various research projects.<br />
The progress of externally funded research<br />
projects was also presented during the meeting<br />
for appraisal of the House. Each new research<br />
project proposal was critically reviewed keeping<br />
in view the recommendation of RAC, relevance<br />
to client and technical suitability.<br />
XXI Meeting of ICAR Regional Committee V<br />
The XXI meeting of the ICAR Regional<br />
Committee V was organized at <strong>Central</strong> <strong>Soil</strong><br />
<strong>Salinity</strong> <strong>Research</strong> Institute, Karnal during<br />
January 10-<strong>11</strong>, 20<strong>11</strong>. The meeting was<br />
inaugurated by Shri Parmvir Singh ji, Hon’ble<br />
Minister of Agriculture, Animal husbandry<br />
& Dairy, Fisheries and Co-operation, Govt. of<br />
Haryana. About 140 eminent delegates including<br />
Principal Secretaries/Secretaries of Agriculture<br />
of Punjab and Haryana, Deputy Director<br />
Generals of ICAR, Vice Chancellors, Directors<br />
of <strong>Research</strong>, Directors of Extension Education<br />
and Deans of the Agricultural Universities;<br />
Assistant Director Generals, ICAR, a number<br />
of prominent agricultural scientists, Directors<br />
of Agriculture/Horticulture and Animal<br />
Husbandry of Punjab and Haryana, Directors of<br />
ICAR Institutes, Zonal Project Director, Project<br />
Coordinators, Heads of ICAR Regional Centers<br />
of the Institutes located in the region, progressive<br />
farmers and Programme Coordinators of Krishi<br />
Vigyan Kendras (KVKs) participated in this<br />
meeting. Dr. K.M.L. Pathak, Deputy Director<br />
General (Animal Science) and nodal officer<br />
of the Regional Committee extended a warm<br />
welcome to the Hon’ble Minister of Agriculture,<br />
Animal husbandry & Dairy, Fisheries and Cooperation,<br />
Govt. of Haryana, Hon’ble Secretary,<br />
DARE and DG, ICAR, other dignitaries and<br />
guests. He reminded that the states of Punjab<br />
and Haryana played a key role in increasing the<br />
agricultural growth rate to 4 percent during the<br />
last year. He briefly highlighted the problems<br />
of the region notably those concerning salinity,<br />
sodicity, nutrient imbalance and declining water<br />
table. Shri Rajiv Mehrishi, additional Secretary<br />
DARE & Secretary ICAR was optimistic that<br />
high cold and frost may not affect agricultural<br />
crops in future as our agricultural scientists are<br />
competent enough to tackle the problem both in<br />
the short and long-term. Dr. J. S. Samra, CEO,<br />
National Rainfed Area Authority, remarked<br />
that Punjab, Haryana and western UP are the<br />
food bowl of India. About 60 million tonnes of<br />
buffer stock required for the food security in the<br />
country would come only from these areas. He<br />
emphasized that water table decline is a serious<br />
issue in this belt as the rate is increasing over<br />
the years.<br />
Dr. S. Ayyappan, Secretary DARE & DG, ICAR<br />
and the Chairman of Regional Committee V, in<br />
his opening remarks expressed satisfaction over<br />
the performance of Indian agriculture during<br />
the last year. He highlighted that the food<br />
grains production during the last year could<br />
reach 234 million tonnes including more than 82<br />
million tonnes of wheat and 16 million tonnes<br />
of pulses, which was first ever performance in<br />
these commodities.<br />
Shri Parmvir Singh ji, Hon’ble Minister of Agriculture, Animal husbandry & Dairy, Fisheries and Co-operation, Govt.<br />
of Haryana inaugurating the XXI meeting of ICAR Regional Committee V<br />
148
<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
Institutional activity<br />
In his inaugural address, Hon’ble Minister<br />
expressed his happiness over India recording<br />
notable achievements in agriculture during<br />
the last four decades beginning with the green<br />
revolution in the late sixties. He highlighted<br />
that this productive region is facing major crisis<br />
of the declining productivity and water table,<br />
contamination of ground water, soil nutrient<br />
imbalance, water logging, soil salinity/alkalinity,<br />
toxicity of heavy metals, and conservation of<br />
animal genetic resources. It has not been able<br />
to fully harness the potential in fisheries sector.<br />
He was hopeful that progressive Govt. policies<br />
and application of new technologies developed<br />
by agricultural scientists will help the nation<br />
to meet the growing demand of food grains.<br />
Dr. D.K.Sharma, Director, <strong>Central</strong> <strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Salinity</strong><br />
<strong>Research</strong> Institute and Member Secretary, ICAR<br />
Regional Committee V, presented the Action<br />
Taken <strong>Report</strong> on the recommendations of the<br />
XX meeting and proposed the vote of thanks.<br />
Salient recommendations of Regional<br />
Committee V Meeting<br />
• Due to rapid urbanization, disposal of<br />
sewage and waste water would become a<br />
challenging issue. A meeting needs to be<br />
conducted through NAAS to discuss use<br />
of such water in agriculture production<br />
system. Mayors of corporations and water<br />
user associations should be sensitized on the<br />
technology of use of sewage/waste water.<br />
• Water table decline is a serious concern<br />
in rice growing areas of Haryana and<br />
Punjab. In-situ rain water conservation<br />
through watershed management and<br />
artificial ground water recharge need to be<br />
popularized at the state level.<br />
• Intensive cropping, imbalanced use of<br />
fertilizers and cultivation of high yielding<br />
varieties have led to decline in soil organic<br />
carbon. To overcome this problem, balanced<br />
use of fertilizers, conservation agriculture<br />
with crop residue management, summer<br />
legumes, etc., need to be popularized.<br />
• Fertigation reduces fertilizer dose on one<br />
hand and increases productivity of crops on<br />
the other. Besides, it improves the quality of<br />
product. There is a strong need to develop<br />
fertigation schedules for different crops of<br />
the region. It was emphasized to develop<br />
low cost soluble fertilizers.<br />
• To reduce the cost of cultivation, increase<br />
resource use efficiency and net returns to<br />
farmers in the region, precise use of inputs<br />
is inevitable. There is a need to develop<br />
the components of precision farming for<br />
different crops of the region.<br />
• Green fodder is always in short supply<br />
particularly during lean period (summer<br />
season) in the states. Tree based fodder<br />
production systems (silvi-pasture and hortipasture)<br />
need to be developed in the region<br />
for green fodder availability throughout the<br />
year.<br />
• Rice straw burning is of serious concern in<br />
the region for soil organic carbon loss and<br />
air pollution. Value addition to rice straw,<br />
rice-straw use as a substrate for mushroom<br />
cultivation, composting, feed-block and soil<br />
mulch needs to be encouraged.<br />
• Observations have been made that<br />
compaction of soil, weeds, pests and<br />
associated problems increase after few years<br />
of continuous zero tillage. Investigations<br />
are needed to record the long-term impact<br />
of zero tillage on various crops of the region<br />
for drawing valid conclusions. Low cost<br />
happy seeder needs to be popularized.<br />
• Due to climatic aberrations, extremely low<br />
temperature during January leads to sterility<br />
in mustard. Work on screening of germplasm<br />
and development of frost tolerant mustard<br />
varieties should be initiated.<br />
• Due to global warming yield of rabi crops<br />
especially wheat is getting affected owing to<br />
terminal heat. Screening of different wheat<br />
cultivars for high temperature tolerance<br />
needs to be expedited in net work project<br />
mode.<br />
• Salt resistant pulse varieties need to be<br />
developed and chickpea variety Karnal<br />
Chana No. 1 should be popularized<br />
• Poor quality seed is one of the reasons<br />
149
Institutional activity <strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
for stagnation of crop productivity in the<br />
region. Availability of good quality seed<br />
and planting material in adequate quantity<br />
for all crops is needed.<br />
• Post harvest losses are very high especially<br />
in horticultural crops. There is a need to<br />
develop post harvest technologies for<br />
various crops, encourage establishment<br />
of processing industries in the catchment<br />
areas, development of cool chains through<br />
PPP mode.<br />
• High pesticide residue is being reported in<br />
vegetables from peri-urban area. Hence, biodegradable<br />
pesticides need to be developed<br />
and recommended dose need to monitored<br />
/ popularized.<br />
• Phytophthora is a serious fungal disease<br />
limiting production of kinnow in the region.<br />
There is a need to develop Phytophthora<br />
resistant root stock.<br />
• Desired sex can be assured in animal by using<br />
sex sorted semen. There is a shortage of sexsorted<br />
semen of buffalo, which is essentially<br />
required to increase its population.<br />
• The preference of fish (less bone) product<br />
is high in demand by the consumer in the<br />
region. Therefore, available technologies<br />
need to be popularized through various<br />
agencies. Besides, value addition to low<br />
quality fish would add to the income of the<br />
fish farmers<br />
• The standard of agricultural education is<br />
deteriorating in the region due to inadequate<br />
faculty and facilities. The matter needs to be<br />
looked into.<br />
• Some local or farmers’ varieties perform<br />
better in some settings. Such, material/<br />
genetic stock needs to be registered through<br />
KVKs.<br />
1 Dr. S.K.Gupta, Director Chairman<br />
2. Dr. V.S.Raparia,<br />
Member<br />
Additional Director Agriculture,<br />
Govt. of Haryana, Panchkula<br />
3. Sh. Mahender Singh Mehla, Member<br />
Hansi Road, Karnal<br />
4. Dr. D. S. Sohi, Principal Scientist Member<br />
NDRI, Karnal<br />
5. Dr. Ali Qadar, Principal Scientist Member<br />
<strong>CSSRI</strong>, Karnal<br />
6. Dr. Prabodh Chander Sharma Member<br />
Principal Scientist <strong>CSSRI</strong>,<br />
Karnal<br />
7. Sh. S. George, Chief Finance & Member<br />
Accounts Officer. NDRI, Karnal<br />
8. Sh. Ratnesh Yadav, Sr. Admn.<br />
Officer, <strong>CSSRI</strong>, Karmal<br />
Member<br />
Secretary<br />
In addition to these members, all Head of Divisions,<br />
Assistant Finance and Accounts Officer, Assistant<br />
Administrative officers, Junior Accounts Officer,<br />
Controlling Officer (PME), Controlling Officer<br />
(Farm) and Estate Officer of the Institute attended<br />
the meeting.<br />
Institute Joint Staff Council Meeting<br />
The Institute Joint Staff Council Meeting was<br />
held at RRS, Bharuch on December 18,<strong>2010</strong>.<br />
The meeting was chaired by Dr. D.K. Sharma,<br />
Director and attended by Sh. Ratnesh Yadav,<br />
Sr. Admn. Officer, Sh. Vishal Acharya, AF&AO,<br />
Drs. S.K. Choudhari and R.K. Yadav, Sh. Roshan<br />
Lal, Sh. Tilak Raj Sharma, Sh. Tarun Kumar,<br />
Sh. Subhash Chand, Sh. Ramesh, Sh. Narendra<br />
Sharma, Dr. G. Gururaja Rao, Sh. Randhir Singh,<br />
RRS, Lucknow and Sh. C.R. Taviyad, RRS,<br />
Bharuch. The members discussed the various<br />
agenda items and other related issues for the<br />
welfare of the staff of the Institute and Regional<br />
<strong>Research</strong> Stations at length and settled these<br />
issues amicably.<br />
Institute Management Committee Meeting<br />
During the period under report, a meeting of the<br />
Institute Management Committee (IMC) was<br />
held at <strong>CSSRI</strong>, Karnal under the Chairmanship<br />
of Dr. S.K. Gupta, Director on 15.10.<strong>2010</strong>. The<br />
following members were present.<br />
Institute Joint Staff Council Meeting in progress<br />
150
<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
WORKSHOP, SEMINAR, TRAINING, FOUNDATION DAY AND KISAN<br />
MELA ORGANISED<br />
Training to M. Tech/Bio-technology Students<br />
Four M. Tech. students from the Jawahar<br />
Lal Nehru Krishi Vishvavidalaya, Jabalpur<br />
attended one month training in the Division<br />
of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering in June<br />
<strong>2010</strong>. It helped to strengthen our linkages with<br />
the University. Two of the trainee students have<br />
opted to work in the Division for their M.Tech.<br />
thesis in the division after completing the coarse<br />
work in the University.<br />
Celebration of Foundation Day<br />
41 st foundation day of the Institute was<br />
celebrated on August 18, <strong>2010</strong>. Dr. B. Mishra,<br />
Vice-Chancellor, Sher-e-Kashmir University<br />
of Agricultural Sciences and Technology,<br />
Jammu was the Chief Guest. He emphasized<br />
that the scientists should conduct the research<br />
to sustain the socio-economic condition of the<br />
farmers and conserve the natural resources<br />
for getting higher productivity of different<br />
crops. He also apprised the house that this<br />
institute has evolved a number of salt resistant<br />
varieties of rice, wheat and mustard. Variety<br />
CSR 30 of rice developed by this institute has<br />
made a significant contribution to improve the<br />
economic status of the farming community. Dr.<br />
Mishra delivered the foundation day lecture<br />
on Advances in Rice and Wheat <strong>Research</strong> for<br />
food and Nutritional Security. He also shared<br />
his experiences in converting saline soil into<br />
fertile land of this institute. He stressed that the<br />
farmers should use organic manure for getting<br />
higher and quality produce.<br />
42 nd foundation day of the Institute was<br />
celebrated on March 1, 20<strong>11</strong>. Dr. N.K. Tyagi,<br />
Member, Agricultural Scientist Recruitment<br />
Board, New Delhi was the chief guest. He<br />
delivered the lecture on Water for Food and<br />
Environment: An Overview on this occasion.<br />
He emphasise that water is embed in the<br />
four critical challenges, be it food, energy,<br />
environment are the impact of climate change.<br />
Dr. N.K. Tyagi, Member, ASRB, New Delhi delivering<br />
the foundation day lecture<br />
Most of these challenges would be easily met, if<br />
we are able to manage water. Water is versatile<br />
in many ways and it has both productive as<br />
well destructive powers. Its productive power<br />
is realized in agriculture, industry, energy,<br />
transport and maintenance of health of both<br />
people and ecosystems. The destructive powers<br />
are seen in floods, inundation, soil erosion and<br />
desertification etc.<br />
Training for CADA Officers on Water<br />
Management and Drainage Strategies for<br />
Irrigation Commands<br />
Two days Training on Water Management and<br />
Drainage Strategies for Irrigation Commands<br />
was organized at <strong>CSSRI</strong>, Karnal during August<br />
17-18, <strong>2010</strong>. The programme was sponsored<br />
by Command Area Development Authority<br />
(CADA), Haryana. The participants under this<br />
training programme included 20 Engineers from<br />
Karnal, Panipat, Kaithal, Kurukshetra, Jhajjar,<br />
Rohtak, Rewari, Jind, Hisar and Fatehabad<br />
districts under Kaithal, Rohtak and Hisar circle<br />
Training on water management and drainage<br />
strategies for irrigation commands<br />
151
Workshop, seminar, training, foundation day and kisan mela organised <strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
of the Command Area Development Authority<br />
of Haryana. Dr S.K. Gupta, Director said that it<br />
is the combined responsibility of the scientists<br />
of the research institutes and Engineers/officers<br />
of the CADA to make the farmers aware of the<br />
efficient utilization of each and every drop of<br />
water received during monsoon.<br />
Organisation of Kisan Gosthi at Village Jagsi<br />
(Sonipat)<br />
A kisan gosthi was organized on 7 th September,<br />
<strong>2010</strong> in village Jagsi district Sonipat where<br />
Haryana Operational Pilot Project is in<br />
operation. In this project, the excess salts are<br />
being drained out by subsurface drainage<br />
system. In this area, the demonstrations were<br />
conducted on the salt affected rice varieties<br />
developed by the institute like CSR 10, 13, 23,<br />
27, 30, 36 and other forest trees. Fish farming<br />
has been initiated in the village pond with<br />
saline water. About 300 farmers participated in<br />
this gosthi. On this occasion, the problems of<br />
the farmers were discussed and respondent by<br />
Dr. S.K. Gupta, Director & Project Coordinator<br />
(Saline water Scheme), Dr. R.S. Tripathi, Head,<br />
TET, other Subject Matter Specialists and Sh.<br />
J.P. Verma, Dy. Project Director, HOPP, Deptt<br />
of Agriculture, Haryana. Dr. Gupta emphasized<br />
that the farmers should join hand with the<br />
scientists and do farming in a scientific manner<br />
by growing salt tolerance varieties with low<br />
water requiring crop so that natural resources<br />
may not be deteriorated. Besides, they would<br />
get more yield with low cost.<br />
Hindi Week Celebration<br />
The Institute celebrated the Hindi Week from<br />
14-28 September, <strong>2010</strong>. Dr. S.K. Kamra, Director<br />
(A) of the Institute inaugurated the function on<br />
14 th September, <strong>2010</strong>. On this occasion, he urged<br />
the staff to use Hindi in day to day work. He<br />
informed the house that Hindi Krishi Patrika of this<br />
Institute has been bestowed with Ganesh Sankar<br />
Vidhiarthi Award-2009. During this week, a<br />
competition of Tatkal Bhashan, Tippan Aalekhan,<br />
Aavedan Patra Lekhan Pratiyogita, Computer mein<br />
hindi typing, Prashanotri Pratiyogita, Takniki Poster<br />
Pradarshani and Kavita Path were organized. Dr.<br />
Kamra told that bilingual research publications<br />
are being brought out so that the benefit of<br />
new technologies can reach to the farmers. On<br />
the concluding function, Haryana Ved Vyas<br />
Awardee Acharya Mavir Prasad Sastry urged<br />
the staff to show love and devotion towards the<br />
Rajbhasha creates affection towards the country.<br />
Dr. S.K. Gupta, Director (A) also addressed<br />
the participants and urged all to work whole<br />
heartedly for the upliftment of the Hindi.<br />
The <strong>CSSRI</strong>, Regional <strong>Research</strong> Station, Bharuch<br />
also celebrated Hindi Week from September 15-<br />
21, <strong>2010</strong>. Various competitions were conducted<br />
during the week for technical, administrative<br />
and supporting staff viz; quiz, eloqution, essay<br />
and letter writing in Hindi. The winners of the<br />
competitions were awarded cash prizes and<br />
certificates.<br />
Dr. S.K. Gupta, Director addressing the <strong>CSSRI</strong> staff at<br />
concluding function of Hindi week celebration<br />
Organisation of Kharif Kisan Mela<br />
Kisan Gosthi at Village Jagsi (Sonipat)<br />
A kharif kisan mela was organized on 8 th October,<br />
<strong>2010</strong>. The mela was inaugurated by Dr. R.S.<br />
Paroda, Chairman, Farmers’ Commission,<br />
Haryana while Dr. I.P.Abrol, Director, Centre<br />
152
<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
Workshop, seminar, training, foundation day and kisan mela organised<br />
Dr. R.S. Paroda,Chairman,Farmers Commission, Haryana addressing the farmers during Kharif Kisan Mela<br />
for Advancement of Sustainable Agriculture<br />
(CASA), New Delhi and Former Director,<br />
<strong>CSSRI</strong> was the guest of Honour. A number<br />
of dignitaries including consultants, Institute<br />
Management Committee members, experts from<br />
Karnal based ICAR institutes, development<br />
departments, CCS HAU RRS, Uchani, Karnal<br />
and allied private agencies actively participated<br />
in the deliberations of the kisan mela. About<br />
1500 farmers and students benefited from this<br />
important function. Dr. S.K. Gupta, Director<br />
highlighted the achievements of the Institute.<br />
The farmers were given a glimpse of the<br />
technologies developed by <strong>CSSRI</strong>, Karnal for<br />
reclamation of salt affected soils, use of poor<br />
quality irrigation water, crop diversification,<br />
medicinal and aromatic plants and salt tolerant<br />
varieties etc. The chairman of the Haryana<br />
Farmers’ Commission, Dr. R.S. Paroda in his<br />
address appreciated the effort of the scientist<br />
for doing research work on the lines of farmers<br />
problem by conserving nutural resources.<br />
Dr. Paroda stressed upon to increase the quality<br />
of the farm produce so that we may be able to<br />
compete in the International market. He also<br />
urged the farm scientists to work towards<br />
breaking the yield barrier so as to meet the food<br />
grain demand of the growing population. In his<br />
presidential address, Dr. I.P. Abrol emphasized<br />
organic farming, inter cropping and conservation<br />
agriculture like bed planting, land laser leveling,<br />
direct seeding of rice and zero tillage sowing of<br />
wheat so that water could be saved and the cost<br />
of cultivation could be reduced. He also advised<br />
the farmers to adopt inte grated farming system<br />
model developed by <strong>CSSRI</strong> and to diversify<br />
for vegetable cultivation and commercial dairy<br />
farming for supplementing their income.<br />
Awareness Programme for the farmers of<br />
Haryana on Reclamation Technologies for Salt<br />
Affected <strong>Soil</strong>s<br />
Two days awareness programme for the<br />
farmers of Palwal (Haryana) was conducted on<br />
Reclamation Technologies for Salt Affected <strong>Soil</strong>s<br />
during October 25-26, <strong>2010</strong>. Thirty farmers of<br />
Palwal district participated in this programme. In<br />
his inaugural address, Dr. D.K. Sharma, Director,<br />
<strong>CSSRI</strong> told that Sonepat, Jhajjar, Bhiwani, Jind,<br />
Sirsa, Fatehabad, Palwal and Rohtak districts are<br />
affected by waterlogging and soil salinity. This<br />
problem could be minimized by the adoption of<br />
subsurface drainage technology. Dr S.K. Gupta<br />
said that Haryana Operational Pilot Project<br />
(HOPP) is working in collaboration with <strong>CSSRI</strong><br />
in the successful installation of the subsurface<br />
drainage system in Gohana and Jagsi (Sonepat),<br />
Kalayat (Kaithal), Beri (Jhajjar), Charkhi<br />
Dadri (Bhiwani), Darba Kalan (Sirsa) and Ban<br />
Mandori (Fatehabad). Farmers should adopt<br />
this technology for reclamation of waterlogged<br />
and salt affected soils. In order to sensitize the<br />
farmers, one day field visit to Jagsi (Sonepat)<br />
was also arranged so that farmers could interact<br />
amongst themselves to get a better insight of the<br />
benefit of this technology.<br />
Farmers participating in awareness programme for<br />
reclamation of waterlogged and salt affected soils<br />
153
Workshop, seminar, training, foundation day and kisan mela organised <strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
Organisation of ISCAR National Symposium<br />
National symposium on recent outlook on<br />
sustainable agriculture, livelihood security and<br />
ecology of coastal region was organized by the<br />
Indian Society of Coastal Agricultural <strong>Research</strong><br />
(ISCAR) from October 27-30, <strong>2010</strong> at Calangute,<br />
Goa in collaboration with Dr Balasaheb Sawant<br />
Konkan Krishi Vidyapeeth, Ratnagiri, Dapoli,<br />
Maharashtra and <strong>Central</strong> <strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Salinity</strong> <strong>Research</strong><br />
Institute, Karnal, Haryana. Major themes of this<br />
symposium were, (1) Advances in sustainable<br />
soil, water and crop management for enhancing<br />
crop productivity, (2) Crop improvement through<br />
traditional and cutting edge technologies for<br />
agricultural, horticultural and plantation crops,<br />
(3) Advances in management of aquaculture,<br />
livestock and allied activities, (4) Transfer of<br />
technology, value addition and marketing for<br />
improved livelihood security, (5) Ecological<br />
threats of the coastal region, adaptation<br />
strategies for mitigation and management of<br />
coastal forestry and (6) Recent innovations on<br />
livelihood improvement with special reference<br />
to coastal region of Maharashtra and Goa. About<br />
200 (including foreign delegates) participated in<br />
this symposium. The Hon’ble Speaker of Goa<br />
Assemby Shri Pratapsingji Rane inaugurated<br />
the symposium. Based on the deliberation and<br />
discussions, the recommendations emerged<br />
were (1) Improved soil and water conservation<br />
measures including land shaping technologies,<br />
should be implemented wherever possible to<br />
augment the good quality water for agricultural<br />
practices and best utilization of the resources for<br />
increasing farm income in the coastal region, (2)<br />
Coastal people must be sensitized to the upcoming<br />
challenges arising out of climate change and (3)<br />
development and improvement of crop varieties<br />
through application of cutting edge technologies<br />
Hon’ble Speaker of Goa Assemby<br />
Shri Pratapsingji Rane at inaugural ceremony<br />
may be given special attention for increasing the<br />
crop productivity in the coastal region.<br />
Training on Advances in Reclamation and<br />
Management of Salt Affected <strong>Soil</strong>s for Forest<br />
Extension Officers of Tamil Nadu<br />
A training on advances in reclamation and<br />
management of salt affected soils was organized<br />
during November 8-14, <strong>2010</strong> for Officers of<br />
Forestry Extension Wing of Tamil Nadu. The<br />
major objective of the training was to train the<br />
officers by providing lectures and practical/<br />
field visits on various aspects of reclamation and<br />
management of salt affected soils. The eight days<br />
training was designed in such a way that it could<br />
cover various aspects of sodic and saline water<br />
reclamation and use of saline water in agriculture<br />
and forestry, management of fisheries and<br />
nutrient stress management for sustainable crop<br />
production in salt affected lands.<br />
Training of Officers of forestry extension wing of Tamil<br />
Nadu in progress<br />
Interaction Meeting with Officers of the Punjab<br />
National Bank Farmer’s Welfare Training<br />
Centres<br />
One day interaction meeting was organized<br />
on November 23, <strong>2010</strong> for bilateral discussion<br />
on various issues related to reclamation and<br />
management of salt affected soils and use of poor<br />
quality water in agriculture among researchers<br />
and officers of PNB Farmer’s Training Centres.<br />
In all 15 Directors and Officers of 9 Farmers<br />
Training Centres under Punjab National Bank<br />
from Haryana, Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan,<br />
Punjab, Uttar Pradesh, Chattishgarh, Tamil<br />
Nadu and Orissa participated in the programme.<br />
The purpose of this programme was to acquaint<br />
the officers about the activities of the institute so<br />
that they would be able to utilize the knowledge<br />
154
<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
Workshop, seminar, training, foundation day and kisan mela organised<br />
Interaction with directors of the FTC under the PNB<br />
Farmers Welfare Trust<br />
in their respective regions by transferring recent<br />
technologies developed to increase the crop<br />
production.<br />
Model Training Course on Integrated Water<br />
Resources Management and Use of Poor<br />
Quality Water in Agriculture<br />
A model training course on integrated water<br />
resources management and use of poor<br />
quality water in agriculture for Subject-Matter-<br />
Specialist/ Officers of State Development<br />
Departments was organized from November<br />
23-30, <strong>2010</strong>. The training was sponsored by the<br />
Department of Agriculture and Cooperation,<br />
Ministry of Agriculture, Govt. of India, New Delhi.<br />
Major objective of the training was to familiarize<br />
the SMS with various problems associated with<br />
water resource management and use of poor<br />
quality waters in agriculture and to make them<br />
acquainted with various technological options<br />
for improving and managing waterlogged salt<br />
affected soils for sustainable agriculture. In this<br />
training programme, 21 officers from 10 states<br />
from Haryana, West Bengal, Gujarat, Orissa,<br />
Himachal Pradesh, Punjab, Andhra Pradesh,<br />
Kerala, Chhattisgarh and Assam participated<br />
International Training Programme on Use of<br />
Poor Quality Water in Agriculture<br />
International Training Programme on Use of<br />
Poor Quality Water in Agriculture for AARDO<br />
(Afro-Asian Rural Development Organization)<br />
was organized from December 1-14, <strong>2010</strong>. The<br />
programme was sponsored by Afro-Asian Rural<br />
Development Organization (AARDO). Seven<br />
delegates from Malaysia, Yemen, Syria, Iraq,<br />
Oman, Mauritius, and Bangladesh participated<br />
in the programme. The main emphasis of the<br />
training remained on sharing of experiences<br />
and in depth knowledge on various aspects of<br />
use of poor quality water in agriculture among<br />
respective AARDO member countries. The<br />
training programme covered the basic aspects<br />
of poor quality waters such as saline, high<br />
RSC and waste water, their characterization,<br />
issues related with their use and strategies<br />
developed by <strong>CSSRI</strong>, Karnal, field experiences<br />
and modern technologies for efficient and<br />
sustainable management of poor quality water in<br />
agriculture. This training included the practical<br />
aspects like extent and quality of ground water,<br />
impact of long-term usage of poor quality water<br />
comprising saline, sodic and waste water on<br />
crop yield and soil health and best management<br />
practices for mitigating the deleterious effects.<br />
Trainees of Afro-Asian Rural Development Organization<br />
Trainees of Integrated Water Resources Management<br />
and Use of Poor Quality Water in Agriculture<br />
Farmers Training and Awareness Programme<br />
on the Protection of Plant Varieties and<br />
Farmers Right<br />
A farmers training and awareness programme<br />
on the Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers<br />
Right was organized on December 28, <strong>2010</strong> and<br />
was attended by about 100 farmers and scientists.<br />
Dr. P.K. Singh, Registrar, Protection of Plant<br />
155
Workshop, seminar, training, foundation day and kisan mela organised <strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
Farmers Training and Awareness Programme on the<br />
Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers Right in progress<br />
Varieties and Farmer Right Authority (PPV&<br />
FRA), New Delhi informed about the rules and<br />
regulation with respect to the right of farmers,<br />
researchers and other stakeholders. Dr. Rakesh<br />
Seth from IARl Regional Station presented<br />
information on seed production techniques.<br />
Dr. S.K. Sharma, Head, Division of Crop<br />
Improvement and Coordinator of the training<br />
give a brief view of the salt tolerant varieties of<br />
rice, wheat, mustard and other crops. The farmers<br />
interacted with the scientists with respect to their<br />
problems and appreciated the contributions and<br />
role of these salt tolerant varieties in increasing the<br />
productivity of their fields and improving their<br />
livelihood. Most of them appreciated of the role<br />
of CSR 30, the first salt tolerant Basmati variety<br />
of rice and its impact in terms of its profitability<br />
and spread in the state of Haryana and other<br />
parts of the country. They also requested that it<br />
should be renamed with the Basmati tag. They<br />
were assured that efforts for getting it renamed<br />
as a Basmati variety are underway with the<br />
concerned Authorities of Government of India<br />
and likely to yield results soon as it will help the<br />
farming community. Dr. S.K Gupta, Director<br />
(A), CSSRl, Karnal emphasized the importance<br />
of these rules and regulations with respect to the<br />
plants varieties protection. He suggested that<br />
farmers should also educate other farmers in their<br />
villages with respect to these developments and<br />
hoped that farmers will think about registering<br />
their genetic material.<br />
Training to Subject Matter Specialist of PACL<br />
India Limited on Management of Salt Affected<br />
<strong>Soil</strong>s & Use of Saline Water in Agriculture<br />
Two days training programme on management<br />
of salt affected soils and use of saline water in<br />
agriculture was organized during January 14-<br />
Training on management of salt affected soils and use of<br />
saline water in agriculture in progress<br />
15, 20<strong>11</strong> field officers of PACL India Limited.<br />
Twenty seven participants took part in this<br />
programme and interacted with scientists on<br />
various aspects of management of salt affected<br />
soils and use of poor quality water. Lectures and<br />
field visits were conducted to enhance the skills<br />
of the field officers. In the concluding session,<br />
Dr. D.K. Sharma, Director of the Institute<br />
emphasized that transfer of technology developed<br />
by the institute is quite important as upliftment of<br />
the farmers is the aim of both the organizations.<br />
It should be possible by collaborative efforts of<br />
researchers and various organizations such as<br />
PACL engaged in the field of agriculture.<br />
Stakeholders’ Capacity Building Training<br />
under NAIP Project on DSS<br />
One Day Stakeholders’ Capacity Building<br />
Training under NAIP Sub-project on “Decision<br />
Support System for Enhancing Productivity<br />
in Irrigated Saline Environment using<br />
RemoteSensing, Modelling and GIS” was held<br />
on 28 January 20<strong>11</strong>. About 170 farmers and<br />
canal water user association members from 12<br />
villages under Butana distributarycommand<br />
area (Jagsi, Gangana, Butana, Khanpur Khurd,<br />
Ahulana, Dhanana, Shamlo Kalan, Rindana,<br />
Banwasa, Chhichhrana and Rukhi in Sonipat<br />
district, and Sanghi in Rohtak district) attended<br />
the training. Dr. S.K. Kamra, Head, Division of<br />
Irrigation & Drainage Engg; Dr. S.K. Gupta,<br />
Project Coordinator (SWS); and Dr. R.S. Tripathi,<br />
Head, Division of Technology Evaluation &<br />
Transfer; Er. Rakesh Chauhan, Superintending<br />
Engineer, Command Area Development (CAD)<br />
Circle, Kaithal; Er. Tarun Aggarwal, Executive<br />
Engineer, CAD Division, Karnal; and Er. J.P.<br />
Verma, Deputy Project Director, Haryana<br />
156
<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
Workshop, seminar, training, foundation day and kisan mela organised<br />
Dr. D.K. Sharma, Director <strong>CSSRI</strong> inaugurated the Stakeholder’s Capacity building training programme<br />
Operational Pilot Project (HOPP), Agricultural<br />
Department, Karnal along with the project<br />
partners and <strong>CSSRI</strong> scientists participated.<br />
In the inaugural address, Dr. D.K. Sharma,<br />
Director, <strong>CSSRI</strong>, appealed to the stakeholders<br />
(farmers) for growing more foods with less<br />
water by adopting scientific methods in view<br />
of shrinking share of canal water in coming<br />
years, ongoing secondary salinization and<br />
waterlogging in the canal command. He stressed<br />
on the use of the technologies developed by<br />
the institute for reclamation of salt-affected<br />
soils and poor quality waters, and growing salt<br />
tolerant varieties of mustard and wheat in the<br />
salt affected lands. Dr. D.S. Bundela, Principal<br />
Scientist & Consortium Principal Investigator<br />
(CPI) presented the project achievements and<br />
field demonstrations undertaken at farmers’<br />
fields with emphasis on stakeholder problems<br />
in the Butana distributary command.<br />
Senior Officers’ Capacity Building Training<br />
Programme under NAIP DSS Project<br />
A Five Days Senior Officers’ (Stakeholders)<br />
Capacity Building Training Programme on<br />
Applications of Modern Tools for Enhancing<br />
Productivity in Irrigated Saline Environment<br />
under NAIP-DSS Project was held during 1-5<br />
March 20<strong>11</strong>. Twenty senior officers- nine from<br />
Command Area Development Agency, six from<br />
Agriculture Departments, and five from KVKs<br />
in the Western Yamuna Canal (WYC) command,<br />
Haryana, participated in the training. Among the<br />
20 participants, Deputy Director (<strong>Soil</strong> Testing),<br />
Karnal, Sh. M.L. Khurana; Deputy Director<br />
(Agriculture), Karnal, Sh. Devinder Malik, and<br />
Deputy Director (Agriculture), Panipat, Sh. R.P.<br />
Sihag; District <strong>Soil</strong> Conservation Officer, Karnal<br />
Sh. O.P. Godara and District <strong>Soil</strong> Conservation<br />
Senior Officers attended a capacity building training<br />
programme<br />
Officer, Panipat, Sh. Anil Kumar, 5 Senior District<br />
Extension Officers and 5 SDO from CADA<br />
were the senior officers in the training. Dr. D.S.<br />
Bundela, Consortium Principal Investigator<br />
(CPI) and Course Director welcomed the<br />
participants and presented the objectives of the<br />
training programme. He highlighted the project<br />
achievements including field demonstrations<br />
at farmers’ fields with emphasis on stakeholder<br />
problems in the mid and tail reaches of the<br />
WYC command. He drew attention to a unique<br />
feature/strength of the project-stakeholder. In his<br />
concluding remarks, Dr. D.K. Sharma, Director,<br />
<strong>CSSRI</strong> emphasized the role of modern tools for<br />
generating accurate and reliable databases on<br />
irrigation water, crops and soils for mapping and<br />
monitoring of productivity in canal commands for<br />
planning effective water management strategies<br />
for growing more food with scientific methods<br />
in view of lesser availability of canal water in<br />
coming years, use of saline groundwater, ongoing<br />
secondary soil salinization and waterlogging in<br />
the canal command.<br />
Organisation of rabi Kisan Mela<br />
A rabi kisan mela was organized on 1 st<br />
March, 20<strong>11</strong>. The mela was inaugurated by<br />
Dr. N.K.Tyagi, Member, Agricultural<br />
Scientist Recruitment Board, New Delhi and<br />
157
Workshop, seminar, training, foundation day and kisan mela organised <strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
Dr. N.K. Tyagi, Member, ASRB, New Delhi addressing the farmers on the occasion of rabi kisan mela<br />
Sh. V.S. Rapadia, Additional Director<br />
(Agriculture) was the Guest of Honour. A<br />
number of dignitaries including consultants,<br />
Institute Management Committee members,<br />
experts from Karnal based ICAR institutes,<br />
development departments, CCS HAU RRS,<br />
Uchani, Karnal actively participated in the<br />
deliberations of the kisan mela. About 1000<br />
farmers and students were benefited from this<br />
function. Dr. D.K. Sharma, Director <strong>CSSRI</strong>,<br />
highlighted the achievements of the Institute.<br />
He said about 1.85 million hectare land has been<br />
reclaimed by the institute in the states of Haryana,<br />
Punjab and Uttar Pradesh. He also elaborated<br />
upon the recent initiatives taken by the Institute<br />
particularly in the field of multiple use of<br />
water, resources conservation technologies etc.<br />
Dr. N.K. Tyagi has advised the farmers to adopt<br />
integrated farming model which is a viable<br />
option in view of the declining water table and<br />
shrinking land holdings. He appreciated the<br />
efforts of Haryana farmers for producing very<br />
good yield of rice and wheat even with poor<br />
quality water. He also highlighted the problem<br />
of water scarcity and per capita reduction in<br />
water availability in India and the need for<br />
increased foodgrain requirements of growing<br />
population. Sh. V.S. Rapardia, Additional<br />
Director (Agriculture), Govt. of Haryana said<br />
that Haryana bags 2 nd place in the contribution<br />
of food grain to food basket of the country. In<br />
the production of basmati rice, the state is at the<br />
top of the country. He also apprised the farmers<br />
about the various schemes/programmes/<br />
incentives run by Haryana and <strong>Central</strong> Govt. for<br />
the benefit of the farmers. To address the water<br />
scarcity in the State, he requested the farmers not<br />
to do paddy transplanting before June 15. Some<br />
NGOs also displayed seeds, fertilizers, pesticides<br />
and agricultural implements. Field visits were<br />
organized in which scientists interacted with<br />
farmers and discussed their problems. Farmers<br />
were informed about technologies developed<br />
at <strong>CSSRI</strong> for reclaimation of salt affected soils,<br />
use of poor quality water, crop diversification,<br />
medicinal and aromatic plants and sallt tolerant<br />
varieties etc. Seeds of rice varieties Pusa 44, Pusa<br />
<strong>11</strong>21, CSR 10, 13, 23, 27 and 36 were sold during<br />
the mela. <strong>Soil</strong> and water samples brought by<br />
farmers were tested free of cost in the mela.<br />
Twenty progressive farmers including 3 women<br />
farmers of Haryana were felicitated during<br />
the mela. Prizes were also given to four best<br />
exhibition stalls in different categories. Nearly<br />
1000 farmers and school students benefited<br />
from the kisan mela.<br />
Field exhibition and visits<br />
Seven field exhibitions were organized<br />
in problematic areas in reclamation and<br />
management of salt affected soils and use of<br />
poor quality waters in agriculture. Large number<br />
of farmers and extension personnel visited<br />
the stalls and acquainted themselves with the<br />
technologies developed by the Institute. During<br />
the year, 716 farmers in 17 groups, 82 extension<br />
personnel in 10 groups, 489 agriculture graduates<br />
in 7 groups and 10 scientists in 2 groups from<br />
India and abroad visited the Institute.<br />
Advisory Services to the Stakeholders<br />
A toll free telephone number (18001801014) is in<br />
operation at the Institute, a large number of quarries<br />
are being asked by the farmers and answered by<br />
the institute’s scientists during each working day.<br />
These quarries are related to reclamation and<br />
management of sodic and saline soil, use of poor<br />
quality water in agriculture and performance of<br />
salt tolerant varieties of different crops.<br />
158
<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
LIST OF SCIENTIFIC, TECHNICAL AND<br />
ADMINISTRATIVE PERSONNEL<br />
Dinesh Kumar Sharma, Ph.D., Director (21.10.<strong>2010</strong>) b<br />
S.K. Gupta, Ph.D., Director (A) (20.10.<strong>2010</strong>) a<br />
Ram Ajore, Ph.D., Director (A) (30.6.<strong>2010</strong>) c<br />
Division of <strong>Soil</strong> and Crop Management<br />
J.C. Dagar, Ph.D. Head (3.<strong>11</strong>.<strong>2010</strong>) a<br />
Madhurma Sethi, Ph.D. (3.<strong>11</strong>.<strong>2010</strong>) b<br />
Lalita Batra, Ph.D.(29.10.<strong>2010</strong>) d<br />
P.K. Joshi, Ph.D.<br />
N.P.S. Yaduvanshi, Ph.D.<br />
Pradip Dey, Ph.D.<br />
C.B. Panday, Ph.D.<br />
S.K.Chaudhari, Ph.D.<br />
Ranbir Singh, Ph.D.<br />
Khajanchi Lal, Ph.D ( 22.3.20<strong>11</strong>) a<br />
A.K. Mandal, Ph.D.<br />
R.K. Yadav, Ph.D.<br />
Sharad Kumar Singh, Ph.D.<br />
H.S. Jat, Ph.D.<br />
Gajender Yadav, M.Sc.<br />
Madhu Chaudhary, M.Sc.<br />
Technical Officers<br />
Bharat Bhushan, M.A.<br />
Arjen Kumar, M.A.<br />
T.N. Khurana, B.Sc.<br />
Naresh Kumar, M.Sc.<br />
Rati Ram<br />
Division of Crop Improvement<br />
S.K. Sharma, Ph.D. Head<br />
Ali Qadar, Ph.D.<br />
Parbodh Chander Sharma, Ph.D.<br />
R.K. Gautam, Ph.D.(28.8.<strong>2010</strong>) a<br />
Neeraj Kulshreshtha, Ph.D.<br />
S.L.Krishna Murthy, Ph.D<br />
Technical Officers<br />
P.S.Tomar, B.Sc. (Ag.)<br />
Division of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering<br />
S.K. Kamra, Ph.D., Head<br />
R.S. Pandey, Ph.D.<br />
D.S. Bundela, Ph.D.<br />
Satyender Kumar, Ph.D.<br />
Pragati Maity, Ph.D.<br />
Technical Officers<br />
Rajiv Kumar, M.Sc.<br />
S.K. Srivastava, Dip. Auto. Engg.<br />
Jai Parkash, M.Sc.<br />
S.K. Dahiya<br />
Jai Narain (31.3.20<strong>11</strong>) c<br />
Ram Pal<br />
Mahabir Singh<br />
Brij Mohan<br />
Sat Pal<br />
Radhey Sham<br />
Division of Technology Evaluation & Transfer<br />
Ram Ajore, Ph.D., Head (30.6.<strong>2010</strong>) c<br />
R.S.Tripathi, Ph.D. (26.8.<strong>2010</strong>)<br />
R.K. Singh, Ph.D.<br />
R. Raju, Ph. D.<br />
Parveen Kumar, Ph.D.<br />
Technical Officers<br />
S.K. Tyagi, Ph.D.<br />
Anil Sharma, M.A.<br />
AICRP (Saline Water)<br />
S.K.Gupta, Ph.D., Project Coordinator<br />
Anil R. Chinchmalatpure, Ph.D.<br />
R.L. Meena, Ph.D.<br />
Technical Officers<br />
Brij Mohan, M.Sc.<br />
S.P. Gupta, Dip. Elect. Engg.<br />
Regional <strong>Research</strong> Station, Canning Town<br />
B. Maji, Ph.D., Head (01.12.<strong>2010</strong>) b<br />
B. K. Bandyopadhyay, Ph. D, LL.B.(30.<strong>11</strong>.<strong>2010</strong>) a<br />
A. R. Bal, Ph. D. (31.12.<strong>2010</strong>) c<br />
D. Burman, Ph. D.<br />
S.K. Sarangi, Ph. D.<br />
Subhasis Mandal, Ph. D.<br />
K.K. Mahanta, Ph. D.<br />
Technical Officers<br />
Deepak Roy, B.Sc., AIC<br />
D.D. Majhi, B.Sc. (Ag.)<br />
D. Pal, Ph. D.<br />
A.B. Mondal, ITI<br />
Sivaji Roy<br />
P. K. Dhar, B. Sc.<br />
Srimati Roy, B. Sc.<br />
L.K. Nayak<br />
M.Haldar<br />
D. Mukharjee<br />
159
List of scientific, technical and administrative personnel <strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
PS to the Head<br />
A. K. Nandi, B. Sc.<br />
Regional <strong>Research</strong> Station, Bharuch<br />
G. Gururaja Rao, Ph.D., Head<br />
M.K. Khandelwal, Ph.D.<br />
Sanjay Arora, Ph.D.<br />
Technical Officer<br />
M.V.S. Rajeshwar Rao, M.Sc.<br />
Regional <strong>Research</strong> Station, Lucknow<br />
D.K. Sharma, Ph.D., Head (20.10.<strong>2010</strong>) a<br />
V.K. Mishra, Ph.D. Head (21.10.<strong>2010</strong>) b<br />
Y.P. Singh, Ph.D.<br />
Chhedi Lal Verma, Ph.D.<br />
T. Damodaran, Ph.D.<br />
Technical Officers<br />
S.K. Jha, Ph.D.<br />
C.S. Singh, Ph.D.<br />
Hari Mohan Verma, M.Tech.<br />
Administrative and Supporting Sections<br />
Administration<br />
Ratnesh Kumar Yadav, SAO, (29.1.20<strong>11</strong>) a<br />
Abhishek Srivastava, Admn. Officer (7.3.20<strong>11</strong>) b<br />
Vishal Acharya, AF&AO (<strong>11</strong>.3.20<strong>11</strong>) a<br />
Ved Parkash, F.A.O. (7.3.20<strong>11</strong>) b<br />
M.V.N.Rao, Jr. Accounts Officer (30.9.<strong>2010</strong>) a<br />
A.K.Kathuria J.A.O. (19.10.<strong>2010</strong>) b<br />
V.S.Negi, Asstt. Admn. Officer (31.3.20<strong>11</strong>) c<br />
A.K.Mishra, Asstt. Admn. Officer<br />
D.R.Khurana, Asstt. Admn. Officer (31.10.<strong>2010</strong>) c<br />
Som Singh, Asstt. Admn. Officer (1.<strong>11</strong>.<strong>2010</strong>) b<br />
Prakash Chand, A.A.O. (28.2.20<strong>11</strong>) c<br />
S.K.Goel, Asstt. Admn. Officer (1.3.20<strong>11</strong>) b<br />
RTI Cell<br />
Parbodh Chander Sharma, Ph.D., CPIO<br />
S.K. Sharma, M.Sc. (Ag. Ext.), APIO<br />
Transparency Officer<br />
R.S. Tripathi, Ph.D.<br />
PME Cell<br />
Pradip Dey, Ph.D., OIC<br />
Institute Technology Management Unit<br />
S.K. Sharma, Ph.D.<br />
Pradip Dey, Ph.D.<br />
D.S. Bundela, Ph.D.<br />
Neeraj Kulshreshtha, Ph.D.<br />
R.K. Singh, Ph.D.<br />
Technical Officer<br />
Sushil Kumar, Ph.D (7.6.<strong>2010</strong>) a<br />
Vijay Kumar, B.Sc., M.A.<br />
Publication and Supporting Services Unit<br />
Pradip Dey, Ph.D., CO<br />
Randhir Singh, M.Sc. OIC<br />
Madan Singh, M. Sc. (Geography)<br />
Hindi Cell<br />
R.S. Tripathi, Ph.D., OIC<br />
Technical Officers<br />
Rashmi Sharma, M.A.<br />
Director Cell<br />
B.D. Khurana ( 28.2.20<strong>11</strong>) c<br />
Tilak Raj<br />
Mange Ram<br />
Public Relation Officer<br />
S.K. Sharma, M.Sc. (Ag.), PRO<br />
PS to Heads<br />
R.K. Dahiya<br />
R.K. Bhatia<br />
Dinesh Gugnani<br />
Rita Ahuja<br />
Sunita Dhingra<br />
Farm Section<br />
Surinder Mohan, B.Sc., Farm Manager<br />
Chander Gupt<br />
Shankar Mehto (31.12.<strong>2010</strong> ) c<br />
Roshan Lal<br />
Samey Singh<br />
Library<br />
Meena Luthra, M.A.<br />
Medical Unit<br />
Dr. (Mrs.) Mahathi Parkash M.B.B.S. S.M.O.<br />
Technical Officer<br />
Chanchal Rani<br />
Estate Section<br />
Randhir Singh, M.Sc.<br />
H.S. Tomar, M.A.<br />
N.K. Vaid, M. Tech.<br />
Ashwani Kumar, Dip.in Machinist<br />
Kulbir Singh, Dip. in Civil Engineering<br />
* Superscripts a, b, c and d refer to date of relieving, joining, superannuating and expiring, respectively<br />
160
<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
<strong>CSSRI</strong> STAFF POSITION<br />
Statement showing the total number of employees and the number of Scheduled Castes (SC)/ Scheduled<br />
Tribes (ST) from 1.4.<strong>2010</strong> to 31.3.20<strong>11</strong><br />
Group/ class<br />
Class-1 permanent<br />
other than lowest<br />
rung of Class-1<br />
Lowest rung of<br />
Class-1<br />
Number of employees Scheduled Castes Scheduled Tribes<br />
Temporary Permanent Total No.<br />
% of<br />
total<br />
No.<br />
% of total<br />
- 51 51 1 1.96 1 1.96<br />
4 16 20 2 10.00 1 5.00<br />
Class-II - 77 77 20 25.97 3 3.89<br />
Class-III 6 50 56 8 14.28 6 10.71<br />
Class-IV<br />
sweepers)<br />
Class-IV<br />
sweepers)<br />
(excluding<br />
(only<br />
2 78 80 24 30.00 5 6.25<br />
- <strong>11</strong> <strong>11</strong> <strong>11</strong> 100.00 - -<br />
Total 12 283 295 66 22.37 16 5.42<br />
Statement of Scheduled Castes (SC) and Scheduled Tribes (ST)<br />
Statement showing the number of reserved vacancies filled by Scheduled Castes (SC)/Scheduled<br />
Tribes (ST) as on 31.3.20<strong>11</strong><br />
Classified<br />
posts<br />
Total Vacancies Scheduled Castes Scheduled Tribes<br />
Notified Filled Notified Filled Notified Filled<br />
Direct Recruitment<br />
Class-I - - - - - -<br />
Class-II - - - - - -<br />
Class-III 6 6 - - - -<br />
Class-IV - - - - - -<br />
Promotions<br />
Class-I - - - - - -<br />
Class-II 4 4 1 - 1 -<br />
Class-III <strong>11</strong> <strong>11</strong> 1 - 1 -<br />
Class-IV - - - - - -<br />
161
<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
WEATHER REPORT <strong>2010</strong><br />
Main Institute, Karnal<br />
During the year <strong>2010</strong>, a total rainfall of 1098.3<br />
mm was recorded as against the mean annual<br />
rainfall of 748.9 mm (for the last 39 years).<br />
The year was an excessive rainfall year as the<br />
annual rainfall was 149% of the long-term mean<br />
annual rainfall, whereas the year 2009 was a<br />
deficit rainfall year (65% of the mean annual<br />
rainfall). The maximum monthly rainfall of<br />
358.6 mm was recorded in September. During<br />
the monsoon season, the highest rainstorm of<br />
90.8 mm was recorded on 8 th September. The<br />
winter rainfall (January and February) was 26.6<br />
mm as compared to the last year winter rainfall<br />
(8.3 mm). Winter rainfall was not adequate to<br />
save a single irrigation and hence, increased<br />
the irrigation demand of rabi crops resulting<br />
in higher withdrawal of water from both canal<br />
and groundwater. There were 48 rainy days as<br />
compared to 24 during the last year.<br />
The minimum 2.8 °C and the maximum 45.0<br />
°C temperatures were recorded on 16 th January<br />
and 27 th May, respectively. The lowest relative<br />
humidity was 9% on 7 th April while the highest<br />
(100%) was recorded on several occasions<br />
during the year. The highest soil temperatures at<br />
5 cm, 10 cm and 20 cm soil depths were 47.0°C,<br />
44.4°C and 40.0 °C on a single day (21 May). The<br />
lowest values at the same depths were recorded<br />
as 7.5°C, 9.5°C and <strong>11</strong>.7°C on 16 th January, 16 th<br />
January and 15 th January, respectively. The<br />
total open pan evaporation during the year was<br />
1730.6 mm which is 1.58 times higher than the<br />
annual rainfall. The lowest evaporation of 0.4<br />
mm was recorded on 8 th January and the highest<br />
of 15.6 mm on 2 nd June. The average sunshine<br />
hours per day were 6.4. The highest and lowest<br />
vapour pressure values were 28.5 and 3.0 mm<br />
of mercury column on 17 th August and <strong>11</strong> th<br />
December, respectively. The average wind speed<br />
was 4.0 km per hour. The monthly weather<br />
parameters recorded at agro-meteorological<br />
observatory, <strong>CSSRI</strong>, Karnal for the year <strong>2010</strong> are<br />
presented in Table I.<br />
RRS Canning Town<br />
The total rainfall received during the year <strong>2010</strong><br />
was <strong>11</strong>35.6 mm, the maximum (243.6 mm)<br />
rainfall was recorded in the month of June, <strong>2010</strong>.<br />
The rainfall was less than the average rainfall of<br />
1768 mm in this area, which affected the growth/<br />
transplanting of rice in the initial months of<br />
the kharif season. Due to meagre rains after<br />
the monsoon period supplementary irrigation<br />
is essential for cultivation of crops in rabi and<br />
summer seasons. There were 71 rainy days in<br />
the year. The average daily sunshine hours are<br />
very less in monsoon months (kharif season),<br />
which results in poor yield of rice, the major crop<br />
in the area, during the period. The minimum<br />
temperature was recorded in the month of<br />
January. The average mean temperature of 17.6<br />
o<br />
C in January rises very rapidly to 31.3 o C in the<br />
month of April. The sudden rise in temperature<br />
causes pre-mature flowering of thermophytom<br />
crop plants such as wheat, mustard, linseed,<br />
etc. The relative humidity remains quite high<br />
throughout the year, which causes severe<br />
problems of infestation of insects, pests and<br />
diseases. Highest average wind velocity (13.0<br />
km h -1 ) was recorded in the month April. The<br />
mean monthly weather parameters recorded at<br />
RRS Canning Town are presented in Table II.<br />
RRS, Bharuch<br />
Agro-meteorological observations (Table III)<br />
recorded at Navsari Agricultural University,<br />
Cotton <strong>Research</strong> Centre, Bharuch (latitude<br />
22ON, longitude 73.5OE, and altitude 16.50 m)<br />
during the year <strong>2010</strong> revealed that this region<br />
received rainfall of 1428.8 mm spread over 76<br />
days. Season’s highest rainfall of 461.3 mm was<br />
received during the month of July. Maximum<br />
temperature varied from 41.2 (29.7) (Dec) to 41.2<br />
(May) and minimum 13.1 (Dec) to 27.1 (May)<br />
degree Celsius. Pan evaporation varied from 1.4<br />
mm day -1 during September to 9.8 mm day-1<br />
during April. The average bright sunshine<br />
hours varied from 2.7 hours during August to<br />
9.8 hours during April. Mean relative humidity<br />
varied from 53.1 per cent during February to 906<br />
per cent during September. The average wind<br />
velocity varied from 0.5 km h-1 during October<br />
to 10 km h-1 during June. On the whole, though<br />
<strong>2010</strong> had received very good rains, very intense<br />
showers during July and August had hampered<br />
on farm operations.<br />
162
<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
Weather report <strong>2010</strong><br />
Table I : Mean monthly weather parameters for the year <strong>2010</strong> recorded at the Agro-meteorological Observatory,<br />
Latitude: 29° 43' N Altitude : 245 metres above the mean sea level<br />
Longitude: 76° 58' E I Time : 0722/0830 hours IST<br />
Month<br />
Max. Min. Grass<br />
Min.<br />
II Time : 1422 hours IST<br />
Temperature °C Vapour<br />
pressure<br />
(mm of Hg)<br />
Relative<br />
humidity<br />
(%)<br />
Dry bulb Wet bulb I II I II High/<br />
I II I II<br />
date<br />
Maximum °C Minimum °C<br />
Jan. 16.0 6.7 1.8 0.78 14.2 <strong>11</strong>.6 12.5 7.8 9.3 98 72 25.2/30 8.8/13 10.9/29 2.8/16<br />
Low/<br />
date<br />
High/<br />
date<br />
Low/<br />
date<br />
Feb. 22.9 8.8 4.2 10.1 22.7 9.5 17.0 8.7 <strong>11</strong>.1 93 54 28.2/28 18.8/<strong>11</strong> 16.2/08 4.5/01<br />
Mar. 30.8 14.6 9.4 16.5 30.8 15.4 21.4 12.6 13.5 89 41 36.2/28 24.6/09 19.2/30 10.6/09<br />
Apr. 39.5 20.2 15.0 24.8 39.2 18.4 21.5 12.1 8.5 53 16 43.6/18 35.8/07 27.2/19 14.5/01<br />
May 39.4 24.3 20.5 27.9 39.1 21.7 24.0 15.9 13.1 56 26 45.0/27 26.7/08 29.0/15 19.5/21<br />
Jun. 38.2 25.3 22.8 28.6 37.5 23.3 25.2 18.2 16.7 63 36 43.6/02 25.2/09 30.5/03 20.0/08<br />
Jul. 33.1 26.2 23.2 27.9 32.0 26.6 27.8 25.3 25.5 90 72 38.0/01 27.5/07 28.6/10 23.5/01<br />
Aug. 32.0 25.9 23.3 27.3 31.2 26.3 27.8 25.1 25.8 92 76 35.0/<strong>11</strong> 28.0/01 27.4/<strong>11</strong> 24.0/24<br />
Sept. 30.5 23.3 21.527 25.1 30.0 24.2 26.2 22.3 23.2 93 73 34.2/02 23.5/20 26.5/03 19.4/29<br />
Oct. 31.4 18.5 16.4 20.5 31.1 19.5 22.8 16.8 16.0 91 46 33.3/05 28.3/24 21.5/21 12.2/28<br />
Nov. 27.4 12.3 10.5 13.7 26.9 12.9 17.6 10.8 9.7 91 36 30.6/07 22.0/23 15.2/08 7.0/29<br />
Dec. 20.9 6.6 4.0 7.5 20.3 7.2 13.8 7.4 7.9 95 47 24.0/06 12.5/27 12.0/30 3.5/22<br />
Total -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --<br />
Average 30.2 17.7 14.4 19.8 29.6 18.0 21.5 15.3 15.0 84 50 -- --<br />
163
Weather report <strong>2010</strong> <strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
Month <strong>Soil</strong> temperature °C (Depth) Rainfall* Evaporation Sunshine<br />
(hr/day)<br />
5 cm 10 cm 20 cm Monthly<br />
I II I II I II (mm)<br />
No of rainy<br />
days<br />
Heavy/<br />
date<br />
mm/ day mm/<br />
month<br />
Jan. 10.5 16.8 <strong>11</strong>.7 15.5 13.4 14.5 7.6 1 6.5/04 1.2 35.8 2.4 2.6<br />
(Contd.....)<br />
Wind<br />
speed<br />
(km/hr)<br />
Feb. 12.5 23.9 14.2 21.2 16.3 18.3 19.0 2 14.2/09 2.5 71.1 6.9 3.7<br />
Mar. 20.2 33.8 21.5 31.1 23.9 26.2 0.0 0 0.0/00 4.0 124.9 9.0 3.6<br />
Apr. 27.7 41.0 29.1 38.1 30.8 33.1 7.6 1 7.6/29 10.0 300.1 8.9 4.7<br />
May 29.1 41.5 30.5 39.3 32.3 36.1 18.0 1 16.8/07 12.2 379.4 8.4 6.9<br />
Jun. 30.2 40.4 31.6 38.5 33.3 36.2 81.0 4 46.0/25 9.3 278.7 7.8 6.3<br />
Jul. 29.1 34.5 29.8 32.9 30.5 31.6 347.6 14 88.4/05 4.3 121.3 5.3 5.6<br />
Aug. 28.1 33.3 28.9 32.1 29.5 31.0 230.9 10 58.6/22 3.7 106.1 4.9 4.3<br />
Sept. 26.3 31.8 26.9 30.9 27.6 29.6 358.6 13 90.4/08 3.5 94.4 4.9 3.7<br />
Oct. 21.9 30.3 23.1 28.6 24.4 27.1 00.0 00 0.0 /0 3.3 103.3 6.6 2.2<br />
Nov. 16.4 26.5 18.0 24.9 19.4 23.0 00.0 00 0.0 /0 2.3 67.9 6.2 1.9<br />
Dec. 10.3 19.7 <strong>11</strong>.9 18.2 13.6 16.3 28.0 2 16.0/31 1.5 47.6 5.3 2.0<br />
Total -- -- -- -- -- -- 1098.3 48 -- 57.8 1730.6 76.6 --<br />
Average 21.9 31.1 23.1 29.3 24.6 26.9 -- -- -- 04.8 144.2 06.4 4.0<br />
Rainfall < 2 mm is drizzle or trace; RF-Rainfall<br />
164
<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
Weather report <strong>2010</strong><br />
Table II : Mean monthly weather parameters at Canning Town (Latitude 22° 15´ N, Longitude 88°40´,<br />
Altitude 3.0 Meters (A.M.S.L.) during the year –<strong>2010</strong><br />
Vapour<br />
Temperature RH<br />
pressure<br />
(<br />
Month<br />
0 C)<br />
(%)<br />
(mm Hg)<br />
Max Min Mean I II I II<br />
Wind<br />
velocity<br />
(km h -1 )<br />
Total<br />
Rainfall<br />
(mm)<br />
Rainy<br />
days<br />
Jan. 23.8 <strong>11</strong>.3 17.6 89 47 09.7 10.1 03.2 000.0 0 06.7<br />
Feb. 29.2 16.5 22.8 91 51 14.0 15.6 03.0 003.5 1 06.8<br />
March 34.7 23.9 29.3 88 47 21.3 19.1 07.2 000.0 0 07.5<br />
April 36.0 26.7 31.3 84 53 24.7 22.6 13.0 021.4 2 08.3<br />
May 35.3 26.6 31.0 84 56 25.1 23.5 10.1 134.0 7 07.1<br />
June 33.8 26.5 30.1 87 72 26.9 26.4 08.9 243.6 12 04.1<br />
July 32.4 26.5 29.4 89 75 25.6 25.6 08.0 220.1 15 05.1<br />
Aug. 32.2 26.3 29.3 88 77 25.6 25.2 06.7 180.1 13 05.1<br />
Sept. 31.7 25.9 28.8 91 77 25.3 25.5 05.6 183.8 13 04.7<br />
Oct. 31.9 24.7 28.3 91 67 23.4 22.6 03.4 135.2 6 06.5<br />
Nov. 30.3 20.9 25.6 92 58 18.9 18.3 02.1 003.4 1 06.4<br />
Dec. 25.4 13.8 19.6 90 51 <strong>11</strong>.8 12.1 02.3 010.5 1 06.1<br />
Total 376.7 269.6 323.1 1064 731 252.3 246.6 73.5 <strong>11</strong>35.6 71 74.4<br />
Mean 31.4 22.5 26.9 89 61 21.0 20.5 06.1 - - 06.2<br />
*I indicates 06:35 hrs (I.S.T) *II indicates 13:35 hrs (I.S.T); AMSL-Above mean sea level<br />
Bright<br />
sunshine<br />
(h d -1 )<br />
Table III : Monthly average weather parameters recorded at Cotton <strong>Research</strong> Station, Navsari Agricultural<br />
University, Bharuch during <strong>2010</strong><br />
Month<br />
Max.<br />
Temp.<br />
( o C)<br />
Min.<br />
Rainfall<br />
(mm)<br />
Rainy<br />
Days<br />
R.H.<br />
(%)<br />
Vapour<br />
Pressure<br />
(SVP/<br />
hrs.)<br />
Wind<br />
Velocity<br />
(kmph)<br />
Sun<br />
Shine<br />
(hrs.)<br />
January 31.3 14.3 - - 62.2 10.3 6.6 8.8 3.9<br />
February 33.1 16.2 - - 53.1 10.0 5.7 8.8 4.6<br />
March 38.4 21.8 - - 57.5 14.5 6.5 9.7 6.3<br />
April 40.6 24.2 - - 67.9 20.6 6.6 9.8 9.8<br />
May 41.2 27.1 2.2 1 69.7 23.7 9.9 9.4 9.2<br />
June 36.6 26.7 99.0 10 77.8 25.0 10.0 6.3 4.5<br />
July 31.7 25.3 461.3 19 86.7 24.8 8.5 3.6 3.2<br />
August 31.7 25.3 419.7 19 77.6 24.6 3.4 2.7 2.1<br />
September 32.3 24.7 378.7 21 90.0 24.6 1.5 4.2 1.4<br />
October 35.9 23.6 9.0 1 73.0 20.6 0.5 8.1 5.2<br />
November 32.8 21.7 58.9 5 79.5 18.8 5.1 7.2 4.0<br />
December 29.7 13.1 - - 68.0 10.4 3.7 8.7 3.1<br />
Total 1428.8 76<br />
R.H.-Relative humidity<br />
Pan<br />
Epn.<br />
(mm)<br />
165
<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />
AUTHOR INDEX<br />
Name Page Name Page<br />
Ajore, Ram 42,<strong>11</strong>7<br />
Arora, S. 89,90,91,93<br />
Bal, A.R. 96,102,106,108<br />
Bandhopadhyay, B. K. 59,95,96,101,102,106,107,108<br />
Batra, Lalita 37,46<br />
Bundela, D.S. 23,25,48,51,53<br />
Burman, D. 59,95,96,100,101,102,106,107,108<br />
Chaudhari, S.K. 26,33,37,53,75,77<br />
Chinchmalatpure, A.R. 32,41,89,90,91,93<br />
Dagar, J.C. 37,54,74,75,77<br />
Damodaran, T. 59,83,85,87<br />
Dey, P. 26,32,53,57<br />
Gathala, M. 72<br />
Gautam, R.K. 58,59,63, <strong>11</strong>7<br />
Gupta, S.K. 23,41,46,48,106,109<br />
Jat, H.S. 28,32,37,72,90<br />
Jeet Ram 75<br />
Joshi, P.K. 26,53<br />
Kamra, S.K. 42,44,51,90,93,100<br />
Khajanchi Lal 30,53,74,75<br />
Khandelwal, M.K. 89,90,91,93<br />
Khurana, M.L. 23<br />
Krishna Murthi, S.L. 57,58,60,71<br />
Kulshreshtha, N. 30,61,62,63,64,66,69,70,<strong>11</strong>7<br />
Kumar, V. 72<br />
Kundu, S.S. 37<br />
Ladha, J.K. 72<br />
Madhu Chaudhary 53<br />
Mahanta, K.K. 95,98,100,106<br />
Mandal, A.K. 21<br />
Mandal, S. 59,95,98,101,102,106,107,108<br />
Meena, R.L. 41,48,54,109<br />
Mishra,V.K. 79,81,83,84,85,87<br />
Nayak. A.K. 81<br />
Pandey, C.B. 74,75,77<br />
Pandey, R.S. 37,46<br />
Pargati Maity 42,51<br />
Qadar, A. 46,57,59,70,<strong>11</strong>7<br />
Rao,G. Gururaja 62,89,91,93<br />
Saharawat, Y.P.S. 72<br />
Sarangi, S.K. 59,95,98,101,102,106,107,108<br />
Satyender Kumar 30,42,44,51,100<br />
Sethi, M. 23,25,48,54<br />
Sharma, D.K. 72,79,81,83,84,85,87,91<br />
Sharma, P.C. 37,63,69,71,72<br />
Sharma, S.K. 26,37,58,59,60,61,66,69,83<br />
Singh, Gurbachan 26,28,37,42,93<br />
Singh, R.K. 90,<strong>11</strong>7<br />
Singh, Ranbir 26,28,81<br />
Singh, S.K. 30,36,42,90<br />
Singh, Y.P. 59,62,79,81,83,84,85<br />
Sirohi, N.S. 37<br />
Tripathi, R.S. 37,41,48,<strong>11</strong>7,<strong>11</strong>8<br />
Varshney, P.K. 79<br />
Verma, C.L. 79,85<br />
Yadav, Gajender 74<br />
Yadav, R.K. 25,30,42,44,53,54,74<br />
Yaduvanshi, N.P.S. 33,37,48,66,72<br />
Maji, B. 95, 98,102<br />
166