26.11.2014 Views

CSSRI Annual Report 2010-11 - Central Soil Salinity Research ...

CSSRI Annual Report 2010-11 - Central Soil Salinity Research ...

CSSRI Annual Report 2010-11 - Central Soil Salinity Research ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

okf"kZd izfrosnu<br />

<strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong><br />

<strong>2010</strong>-20<strong>11</strong><br />

<strong>Central</strong> <strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Salinity</strong> <strong>Research</strong> Institute<br />

Karnal - 132 001 INDIA


Citation<br />

<strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong>, <strong>2010</strong>-20<strong>11</strong>, <strong>Central</strong> <strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Salinity</strong> <strong>Research</strong> Institute, Karnal-132 001, India<br />

Edited by<br />

D.K. Sharma, S.K. Gupta, Randhir Singh and Pradip Dey<br />

Assistance<br />

Madan Singh<br />

Cover Photos<br />

Institute <strong>Research</strong> Activities<br />

Photography<br />

D.B. Thapa<br />

Published by<br />

Director, <strong>Central</strong> <strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Salinity</strong> <strong>Research</strong> Institute, Karnal-132 001 India<br />

Telephone : +91-184-2290501; Gram : <strong>Salinity</strong>; Fax: +91-184-2290480, 2292489<br />

Email : director@cssri.ernet.in; Website : www.cssri.org<br />

Printing<br />

Intech Printing & Publishers<br />

# 353, Ground Floor, Mugal Canal Market, Karnal-132 001<br />

Ph. 0184-4043541, 3292951, Email : jobs.ipp@gmail.com


<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

PREFACE<br />

Food and nutritional security of the ever increasing population calls for sustained productivity<br />

from the limited land and water resources, which is further thwarted by the multiplicity of resource<br />

degradation problems. Salt affected soils alone have assumed significant global dimension, as<br />

about 1000 million ha area in more than hundred countries is affected by this menace. India, with<br />

6.73 million ha of salt affected lands, suffers huge economic losses. Besides, rapid salinization and<br />

sodication of land in the irrigated landscape is inflicting unacceptable environment damages. Poor<br />

quality ground water, shrinking biological diversity and threat of the global climatic change have<br />

added new dimensions to the already complex problem of rational management of soil and water in<br />

salt affected environment. As such, we have to strive to develop technologies that are acceptable to<br />

the farmers both in economic and the environment terms.<br />

The year <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong> at <strong>CSSRI</strong> has been an eventful year, wherein we not only pursued the on-going<br />

research programmes to develop cost-effective and eco-friendly technologies but also indulged in<br />

thinking, discussing and planning new research agenda to ensure sustainable productivity in the<br />

saline environment. Some of the significant research achievements for the year relate to: development<br />

of decision support system for enhancing productivity in irrigated saline environment, utilization<br />

of bio-sludge from the fertilizer industry for vegetables production, sustainable land and water<br />

management in coastal eco-system, selection of salt-tolerant varieties of rice in Sundarbans through<br />

PPP mode and technology of direct seeded rice under reclaimed sodic soils. The resource conservation<br />

technologies being developed at the institute attracted large number of dignitaries and farmers from<br />

far and near.<br />

The newly constituted <strong>Research</strong> Advisory Committee (RAC) under the Chairmanship of<br />

Dr. Pratap Narain, Former Vice-Chancellor of Rajasthan Agricultural University and Ex-Director<br />

CAZRI, Jodhpur, met during October 22-23, <strong>2010</strong> to review the research programmes of the institute<br />

and offered very valuable suggestions for future research agenda. Some of the researchable issues<br />

identified by RAC included: development of technologies for groundwater recharge under saline<br />

environment, bio-remediation and phyto-remediation measures to manage poor quality water<br />

including waste waters, shifting the focus of multi-enterprise model to major enterprises in the context<br />

of agro-social conditions, upgradation of monitoring and evaluation activities in phased manner,<br />

reclamation and management of waterlogged sodic/saline soils and impact of climate change on<br />

crops grown in salt affected environment. The newly constituted QRT under the chairmanship of<br />

Dr. S.S. Khanna Former Advisor (Agriculture), Planning Commission, GoI, New Delhi also had its<br />

first meeting on November 4, <strong>2010</strong> in the presence of Dr. A.K. Singh DDG (NRM) at New Delhi.<br />

The second meeting was held during December 22-24, <strong>2010</strong> at <strong>CSSRI</strong>, where a comprehensive plan<br />

was prepared to complete the task in a time bound manner. Staff <strong>Research</strong> Council meeting was<br />

organized during December 6-10, <strong>2010</strong>. The progress of each project was reviewed and new research<br />

programmes formulated keeping in view the RAC recommendations.<br />

The Kharif and Rabi Kisan Melas were organized. While Dr. R. S. Paroda, Former DG, ICAR and<br />

Chairman, Haryana Kisan Aayog addressed the farmers in the Kharif Kisan Mela, Dr. N.K. Tyagi,<br />

Member, ASRB, New Delhi addressed them during the Rabi Kisan Mela. Coinciding with the Rabi<br />

mela, <strong>CSSRI</strong> organized the institute 42nd Foundation day on March 1, 20<strong>11</strong>. The foundation day<br />

lecture on “Water for Food and Environment: An Overview” was delivered by Dr. N.K.Tyagi. He<br />

also distributed the <strong>CSSRI</strong> excellence awards to the winners on this occasion. Besides, a number of<br />

workshops/training programmes were organized during the year.<br />

i


Preface <strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

We had the privileges of welcoming a number of distinguished visitors, notable amongst them<br />

being Dr. Robert S. Zeigler, Director General, IRRI, Philippines and Dr. Thomas Lumpkin, Director<br />

General, CIMMYT, Mexico. They evinced keen interest in resource conservation technologies.<br />

Dr. Paroda during his visit to the institute had a very fruitful meeting with the farmers’ representatives.<br />

We utilized the presence of key national and international visitors in showcasing our research<br />

achievements and discussing the on-going and future programmes.<br />

<strong>CSSRI</strong> in recent times was quite handicapped in conducting field experiments as salt affected lands<br />

under its control have been reclaimed. During the year, Government of Haryana approved the<br />

leasing of land by Panchayat of the Nain village near Panipat. According to the agreement, 10.45 ha of<br />

Panchayat land are leased to <strong>CSSRI</strong> for a period of 10 years.<br />

Dr. R.S. Tripathi joined as Head, Division of Technology Evaluation and Transfer. Several colleagues<br />

got promoted while several scientists, technical, administrative and supporting staff retired<br />

from service after rendering valuable service to the institute. We congratulate those promoted<br />

and wish happy and healthy retired life to the superannuated staff. Upon the superannuation of<br />

Dr. Ram Ajore, Director (A) on 30.06.<strong>2010</strong>, Dr. S.K. Gupta worked as Director (A) up to 20.10.<strong>2010</strong>. I<br />

place on record his significant contributions in the administrative and research set-up of the institute.<br />

Dr. S. Ayyappan, Secretary, DARE and DG, ICAR decided to organize the ICAR Regional Committee<br />

V Meeting and KVK’s interface meet at <strong>CSSRI</strong>, Karnal during January 10-<strong>11</strong>, 20<strong>11</strong>. The event could<br />

be successfully organized with guidance from hon’ble DG, Dr. K.M.L. Pathak, DDG (AS) and with<br />

active cooperation of the staff of the institute.<br />

The institute received a number of awards from ICAR and other organizations during the year. The<br />

institute was bestowed with the Sardar Patel Best Institute Award – 2009 by the Council. Ganesh<br />

Sankar Vidhyarthi Puruskar was also given to the institute for its publication Krishi Kiran. Ministry<br />

of Water Resource, Govt. of India awarded the institute for its outstanding research work on<br />

groundwater recharge. Individual honors were bestowed upon several scientists of the institute in<br />

the form of fellowships/gold medals. <strong>CSSRI</strong> excellence awards were also given in scientific, technical,<br />

administrative and supporting categories. I congratulate all the award winners on their achievement<br />

and wish them best for future advancement.<br />

Institute made significant impact in promoting Hindi in all its programmes. The Institute hosted the<br />

‘Rashtriya Krishi Vigyan Goshti’ to popularize research publications in Hindi. A city based workshop<br />

on Hindi was also organized during the year.<br />

The guidance and support received from Dr. S. Ayyappan, Secretary, DARE and DG, ICAR,<br />

Dr. A.K. Singh DDG (NRM) and Dr. P.S. Minhas ADG (<strong>Soil</strong>s and WM) is gratefully acknowledged.<br />

Dr. S.K. Gupta, Sh. Randhir Singh and Dr. Pradip Dey, shared the major responsibility of synthesizing,<br />

editing and getting the annual report printed. Dr. R.K. Yadav and Dr. R.L. Meena helped in Hindi<br />

translation of the executive summary. I appreciate the efforts made by them and other colleagues<br />

who provided the material for timely publication of the report.<br />

I believe that the information cited in this report would provide readers some glimpses of the <strong>CSSRI</strong><br />

achievements during the year. I would be happy to receive any suggestions/comments from readers<br />

for its improvement in future.<br />

June 30, 20<strong>11</strong><br />

<br />

D.K. Sharma<br />

Director<br />

ii


<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

CONTENTS<br />

Preface<br />

i-ii<br />

lkjka'k 1<br />

Executive Summary 8<br />

Introduction 14<br />

<strong>Research</strong> Achievements 19<br />

Database on Salt Affected <strong>Soil</strong>s 21<br />

Reclamation and Management of Alkali <strong>Soil</strong>s 26<br />

Management of Water Logging/Saline <strong>Soil</strong>s 41<br />

Management of Marginal Quality Water 53<br />

Crop Improvement for <strong>Salinity</strong>, Alkalinity and Waterlogging Stresses 57<br />

Agroforestry in Salt Affected <strong>Soil</strong>s 74<br />

Reclamation and Management of Alkali <strong>Soil</strong>s of <strong>Central</strong> and Eastern Gangatic Plains 79<br />

Reclamation and Management of Salt Affected Vertisols 89<br />

Reclamation and Management of Coastal Saline <strong>Soil</strong>s 95<br />

Aicrp on Management of Salt Affected <strong>Soil</strong>s and Use of Saline Water in Agriculture 109<br />

Technology Assessed and Transferred <strong>11</strong>7<br />

General/ Miscellaneous <strong>11</strong>9<br />

Trainings in India and Abroad 121<br />

Deputation of Scientists Abroad 123<br />

Awards and Recognitions 124<br />

Linkages and Collaborations 126<br />

List of Publications 128<br />

Participation in Conference/Seminar/Symposium/Workshops 139<br />

List of On-going Projects 141<br />

Cosultancies, Patents and Commercialisation of Technologies 146<br />

Institutional Activity 147<br />

Workshop, Seminar, Training, Foundation Day and Kisan Mela Organised 151<br />

List of Scientific, Technical and Administrative Personnel 159<br />

<strong>CSSRI</strong> Staff Position 161<br />

Weather <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong> 162<br />

Author Index 166<br />

iii


<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

lkjka’k<br />

dsUnzh; e`nk yo.krk vuqla/kku laLFkku djuky<br />

dh LFkkiuk yo.kxzLr e`nkvksa ,oa fuEu xq.koÙkk<br />

okys ty ds lq/kkj rFkk —f’k esa mi;ksx lacaf/kr<br />

vk/kkjHkwr ,oa O;ogkfjd vuqla/kku ,oa çca/ku gsrq<br />

lu~ 1969 esa dh xbZA bl fo’k; ij vuqla/kku ds<br />

fy, ;g laLFkku vUrjkZ’Vªh; Lrj ij fo[;kr ,d<br />

mR—‘V laLFkku gSA Hkkjr o’kZ esa yxHkx 6-73 fefy;u<br />

gsDVs;j {ks= yo.kxzLr gSA bu yo.kxzLr e`nkvksa<br />

dks eq[;r% nks oxksZa] {kkjh; ,oa yo.kh; esa foHkkftr<br />

fd;k x;k gSA ns”k dh fofHkUu HkkSxksfyd ifjfLFkfr;ksa<br />

esa yo.kxzLr e`nkvksa ds lq/kkj ,oa izca/ku rFkk fuEu<br />

xq.koÙkk ty ds —f’k esa mi;ksx laca/kh ykHknk;d<br />

rduhd fodflr djus esa dsUnzh; e`nk yo.krk<br />

vuqla/kku laLFkku dk fo”ks’k ;ksxnku jgk gSA catj<br />

tehu ds ekfyd xjhc fdlkuksa dh vkthfodk<br />

lqj{kk ,oa thou Lrj lq/kkj ds jk’Vªh; tukns”k<br />

ds vuq:Ik dsUnzh; e`nk yo.krk vuqla/kku laLFkku<br />

us vfr egRoiw.kZ dk;Z fd;k gSA uohure vuqeku<br />

ds vuqlkj laLFkku ds iz;klksa ls lq/kkjh xbZ 1-85<br />

fefy;u gsDVs;j catj Hkwfe ls ns”k ds dsUnzh;<br />

[kk|kUu HkaMkj esa yxHkx 15 fefy;u Vu vfrfjDr<br />

[kk|kUu dh iwfrZ gksrh gSA laLFkku ds pkj izeq[k<br />

izHkkxksa }kjk cgqfo’k;d vuqla/kku dk;ZØe lapkfyr<br />

gksrs gSaA e`nk ,oa Qly izcU/ku izHkkx ds çeq[k<br />

dk;ZØeksa esa HkwlosZ{k.k ,oa vko”;d iz;ksx”kkyk<br />

ifj{k.kksa }kjk yo.kxzLr Hkwfe;ksa ds vkadM+s<br />

,d= djuk] ftIle }kjk lq/kkjh xbZ e`nkvksa ds<br />

izca/ku gsrq leqfpr rduhd fodflr djuk]<br />

lalk/ku laj{k.k rduhd dk bu e`nkvksa ds izca/ku<br />

gsrq leqfpr fodkl djuk] fuEu xq.koÙkk ty ds<br />

—f’k esa mi;ksx ds fy, mfpr rduhd fodflr<br />

djus] miyC/k ikuh ds cgqmÌs”kh; —f’k ds fofHkUu<br />

?kVdksa esa leqfpr mi;ksx laca/kh rduhd dk<br />

fodkl djuk rFkk bu ifjfLFkfr;ksa ds fy, mfpr<br />

—f’k&okfudh] —f’k&ckxokuh o tSfod mipkj<br />

vkfn gSaaA flapkbZ ,oa tyfudkl vfHk;kaf=dh izHkkx<br />

esa tykØkUr yo.kxzLr e`nk lq/kkj ,oa izcU/k] ty<br />

fudkl dh o`gn ifj;kstukvksa dh fuxjkuh ,oa<br />

ewY;kadu] yo.kksa vkSj ty larqyu ds {ks=h; ekWMy<br />

cukus ,oa mudk mi;ksx] uydwi ty xq.koÙkk dh<br />

fuxjkuh vkSj Hkwty iquHkZj.k rduhd laca/kh “kks/k<br />

dk;ZØe pyk, tkrs gSaA Qly lq/kkj izHkkx esa /kku]<br />

xsg¡w vkSj ljlksa dh vf/kd mit nsus okyh yo.k]<br />

{kkj ,oa tyeXurk jks/kh ;k lgu”khy thu:iksa<br />

dk ijEijkxr ,oa nwljh uohure rduhdksa<br />

tSls eksfyD;wyj] ikni Økf;Zdh ,oa vkuqokaf”kd<br />

vfHk;kaf=dh vkfn }kjk fodkl laca/kh “kks/k dk;Z<br />

fd;k tkrk gSA rduhd ewY;kadu ,oa çlkj izHkkx<br />

dk dk;Z laLFkku }kjk fodflr rduhdksa dk<br />

fdlkuksa rFkk vke tu ds thou;kiu] vkthfodk<br />

lqj{kk] jkstxkj l`tu ,oa] xjhch mUewyu vkfn ij<br />

izHkko dk ewY;kadu dj rnksijkUr bu rduhdksa<br />

ds ckjs esa jk; dks laLFkku ds laKku esa ykuk gSA<br />

fofHkUu HkkSxksfyd ifjfLFkfr;ksa dh yo.kxzLr e`nkvksa<br />

rFkk fuEu xq.koÙkk ty laca/kh fo”ks’k leL;kvksa ds<br />

lek/kku dh fn”kk esa dk;ZØeksa ds fy, laLFkku<br />

us rhu {ks=h; vuqla/kku dsUnz LFkkfir fd;s gSaA<br />

leqnzrVh; yo.krk izcU/ku gsrq dsfuax VkÅu ¼if”pe<br />

caxky½] yo.kxzLr oVhZlksy e`nk izcU/ku “kks/k ds<br />

fy, Hk#p ¼xqtjkr½ rFkk fla/kqxaxk ds e/; {ks= dh<br />

ÅFkys Hkwty ifjfLFkfr okyh yo.k izHkkfor e`nk<br />

izcU/ku ij “kks/k ds fy, y[kuÅ ¼mÙkj izns”k½ esa<br />

;g {ks=h; dsUnz LFkkfir fd;s x,s gSaA yo.kxzLr<br />

e`nkvksa vkSj [kkjs ikuh dk —f’k esa mi;ksx lacU/kh<br />

,d vf[ky Hkkjrh; lefUor ifj;kstuk Hkh laLFkku<br />

ds eq[;ky; esa fLFkr gSA bl ifj;kstuk ds vUrZxr<br />

iwjs ns”k ds fofHkUu —f’k ikfjfLFkfrdh {ks=ksa esa vkB<br />

dsUnz] vkxjk ¼mÙkj çns”k½] ckiVyk ¼vkU/kz çns”k½]<br />

chdkusj ¼jktLFkku½] xaxkoVh ¼dukZVd½] fglkj<br />

¼gfj;k.k½] bankSj ¼e/; çns”k½] dkuiqj ¼mÙkj çns”k½<br />

vkSj f=pqjkiYyh ¼rfeyukMw½ esa dk;Zjr gSaA laLFkku<br />

dh o’kZ <strong>2010</strong>&<strong>11</strong> dh izeq[k miyfC/k;ksa dk laf{kIr<br />

fooj.k fuEukuqlkj gSA<br />

/kku&xsgw¡ Qly i¼fr esa lalk/ku laj{k.k rduhsd<br />

fla/kq&xaxk ds eSnkuh {ks=ksa dh gYds xBu<br />

okyh e`nkvksa esa yxkrkj /kku&xsgw¡ Qly pØ<br />

viukus ds dkj.k çk—frd lalk/kuksa ij foifjr<br />

çHkko gqvk gSA /kku&xsgw¡ Qly iz.kkyh dh<br />

mit c


lkjka’k<br />

<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

de tqrkbZ rFkk /kku ds vo”ks’k [ksr esa feykus<br />

ds mijkUr dh xbZ gksA tcfd “kwU; tqrkbZ okys<br />

[ksrksa esa xsgw¡ dh iSnkokj ¼5-54 Vu@gsDVs;j½ nwljs<br />

LFkku ij jghA Qly vo”ks’kksa dks [ksr esa feykus<br />

ls xsgw¡ dh iSnkokj esa 7 izfr”kr c


<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

lkjka’k<br />

[kkjfp;k esa tyeXurk ds izfr vPNh lgu”khyrk<br />

ntZ dh xbZA Hkkjrh; ,oa vkLVªsfy;k dh xsgw¡<br />

iztkfr;ksa esa tyeXurk ds izfr {kkjh; e`nk esa dkQh<br />

fHkUurk ikbZ xbZA v/;;u ds nkSjku ik;k x;k<br />

fd ihchMCyw 525@dsvkj,y 99 esa tyeXurk ,oa<br />

jrqvk chekjh ds izfr dkQh lgu”khyrk gS rFkk bu<br />

ij xgu v/;;u dh vko”;drk gSA<br />

ukbVªks&bVhih bdkbZ ls fu"dkflr tSfod Lyt ,oa<br />

mipkfjr vif'k"V dk ofVZlksy esa Qly mRiknu gsrq<br />

mi;ksx<br />

i;kZoj.k iznw’k.k ,d eq[; leL;k gS tksfd Rofjr<br />

vkS|ksfxdhdj.k] “kgjhdj.k rFkk thou “kSyh esa<br />

cnyko ds lkFk tqM+h gqbZ gSA vkS|ksfxdhdj.k ls<br />

mRiUu Bksl ,oa rjy vo”ks’k Hkh i;kZoj.k çnw’k.k<br />

ls tqM+h gqbZ gkfudkjd leL;kvksa dk dkj.k gSA<br />

xqtjkr ueZnk oSyh QfVZykbTkj dEiuh] Hk:p dh<br />

ukbVªks&bVhih bdkbZ ls mRiUu tSfod Lyt dk<br />

Qly o`f) ,oa e`nk xq.kksa ij tSfod [kknksa ds<br />

lkFk rqyukRed izHkko dk v/;;u djus ds fy,<br />

laHkkoukvksa dh ryk”k dj mudh O;ogkfjdrk dh<br />

igpku djus ds iz;kl fd;s x;sA yksfc;k] Xokj]<br />

vejaFkl] fHkaMh ds Åij tSfod Lyt vdsys ,oa<br />

tSfod [kknksa tSls xkscj dh [kkn ,oa dsapqvk [kkn<br />

ds lkFk mi;ksx djus ij izHkko tkapus ds fy,<br />

iz{ks= iz;ksx yxk;s x;sA ifj.kkeksa ls ;g Kkr<br />

gqvk gS fd tSfod Lyt esa eq[; iks’kd rRoksa tSls<br />

u=tu] QkLQksjl bR;kfn dh mifLFkfr ls dkj.k<br />

;g ,d vkn”kZ oSdfYid iks’kd rRo lzksr gS tks<br />

fd Qly dh vkaf”kd iks’kd rRoksa dh t:jrksa dks<br />

iwjk djrh gSA v/;;u ls ;g fu’d’kZ fudyrk gS<br />

fd tSfod Lyt dk mi;ksx e`nk xq.kksa dks c


lkjka’k<br />

<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

izfr”kr½ cgqr gh de ik;h x;hA mPp Hkwfe n”kkvksa<br />

eas o`{kksa dh Å¡pkbZ ,oa rus dk O;kl loksZre ik;k<br />

x;k rFkk ;g fuEu Hkwfe n”kkvksa ls ges”kk vf/kd<br />

jgkA<br />

caxky ds rVh; izns'k ds xjhc Ï"kdksa ds fy;s yo.k<br />

lgu'khy pkoy<br />

[kjhQ ekSle esa rVh; izns”k dh yo.k lgu”khy<br />

pkoy dh fdLeksa dk pquko izHkkoh rjhds ls fd;k<br />

x;k] ftlesa fdlkuksa] efgyk [ksfrgkjkas o oSKkfudksa<br />

dks lfEefyr fd;k x;kA fdlkuksa us fdLeksa ds<br />

pquko esa egÙoiw.kZ ;ksxnku n”kkZ;kA fdLeksa dk<br />

pquko dsoy mit dkjd ds vk/kkj ij gh ugha<br />

fd;k x;k] blesa vU; dbZ dkjd tSls&nkus dk<br />

izdkj] mldh xq.koÙkk] vof/k] ck;ksekl mRiknu<br />

o ikni yEckbZ vkfn Hkh lfEefyr Fks] ftUgksaus<br />

pkoy dh fdLeksa ds pquko dks izHkkfor fd;kA<br />

lqUnj ou {ks= esa izfrHkkxh fdLeksa dk pquko fofHkUu<br />

LFkkuksa ¼dsfuax] pkUn[kyh] fudkjh?kkV] fueihFk o<br />

dksbZ[kyh½ ij fd;k x;kA fo”ys’k.k ls ;g Kkr gqvk<br />

fd [kjhQ esa lh,lvkjlh ¼,l½ 21&2&5&ch&1&1<br />

o xhrktayh rFkk jch esa fc/kku&2 o dsfuad&7<br />

lokZf/kd izkFkfedrk okyh pkoy dh fdLesa FkhA<br />

lq/kjh {kkjh; e`nkvksa esa thjks fVyst rduhd ds vkfFkZd<br />

izHkko<br />

Ñf’k tqrkbZ dh ykxr dks de djus o izkÑfrd<br />

lalk/kuksa tSls ty o e`nk dh mRikndrk dks fLFkj<br />

cuk;s j[kus esa laHkor% thjks fVyst rduhd ,d<br />

mÙke rjhdksa esa ls gSA blds dbZ ykHk gS tSls ykxr<br />

de djuk] mit dks fLFkj cuk;s j[kuk] ykHk c


<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

lkjka’k<br />

ikfjfLFkfrdh ds orZeku ifjn`”;½ ij ,d jk’Vªh;<br />

laxks’Bh dk vk;kstu dsysaxsVh] xksvk esa fd;k<br />

x;k<br />

• lesfdr ty çca/ku ,oa fuEu xq.koŸkk ty dk<br />

—f’k esa mi;ksx ij 23 ls 30 uoEcj <strong>2010</strong> ds<br />

nkSjku ,d vkB fnolh; ekWMy çf”k{k.k dk;ZØe<br />

dk vk;kstu fd;k x;k ftlesa 10 jkT;ksa ds 21<br />

vf/kdkfj;ksa us Hkkx fy;k<br />

• —f’k esa fuEu xq.koŸkk ty ds mi;ksx ij 1<br />

ls 14 fnlEcj <strong>2010</strong> ds nkSjku vÝks&,f”k;u<br />

xzkeh.k fodkl ea=ky; ¼,,vkjMhvks½ ds lnL;<br />

ns”kksa ds çfrHkkfx;ksa ds fy, ,d vUrjkZ’Vªh;<br />

çf”k{k.k dk;ZØe dk vk;kstu fd;k x;kA blesa<br />

eysf”k;k] ;eu] lhfj;k] bjkd] vkseku] ekWjhll<br />

,oa ckaXykns”k ds lkr çfrHkkfx;ksa us Hkkx fy;k<br />

• fnlEcj 28] <strong>2010</strong> dks ikni fdLeksa ds cpko<br />

,oa fdlkuks ds vf/kdkj ij ,d fdlku çf”k{k.k<br />

,oa tkx:drk dk;ZØe dk vk;kstu fd;k x;k<br />

ftlesa yxHkx 100 fdlkuksa ,oa oSKkfudksa us<br />

Hkkx fy;kA\<br />

• ekpZ 1] 20<strong>11</strong> dks laLFkku dk 42ok¡ LFkkiuk<br />

fnol euk;k x;kA bl fnol ij Ñf’k oSKkfud<br />

p;u eaM+y ds lnL; MkWñ ,u- ds- R;kxh eq[;<br />

vfrfFk ds :Ik esa mifLFkr jgs rFkk LFkkiuk<br />

Hkk’k.k fn;k<br />

[ksr izn'kZfu;k¡ vkSj Hkze.k<br />

yo.kxzLr e`nkvksa dk lq/kkj rFkk —f’k esa [kkjs ikuh<br />

dk mi;ksx ds lacaf/kr {ks=ksa esa 7 [ksr izn”kZfu;k¡<br />

yxkbZ xbZA bu izn”kZfu;ksa esa fdlkuksa rFkk foLrkj<br />

fo”ks’kKksa us çn”kZu LVkYl dk Hkze.k fd;k rFkk<br />

laLFkku }kjk fodflr rduhfd;ksa ls çHkkfor gq;sA<br />

o’kZ ds nkSjku laLFkku esa ns”k rFkk fons”k ls 716<br />

fdlku 7 nyksa esa] 82 foLrkj dk;ZdrkZ 10 nyksa<br />

esa] 489 —f’k Lukrd f”k{kkFkhZ 7 nyksa esa rFkk 10<br />

oSKkfud 2 nyksa esa Hkkjr ,oa fons”k ls laLFkku dk<br />

Hkze.k fd;kA<br />

Hkkxhnkj fdlkuksa (LVsdgkWYMlZ) ds fy, ijke'kZ<br />

lsok,¡<br />

laLFkku }kjk ,d fu%”kqYd nqjHkk’k ¼18001801014½<br />

lsok dk lapkyu fd;k tk jgk gS ftlesa yo.kh;<br />

,oa {kkjh; e`nkvksa ds lq/kkj ,oa çca/ku] fuEu<br />

xq.koŸkk ty mi;ksx rFkk fofHkUu Qlyksa dh yo.k<br />

lgu”khy çtkfr;ksa ds ckjs esa fdlku dh leL;kvksa<br />

dk lek/kku nwjHkk’k ds ek/;e ls oSKkfudksa }kjk<br />

fn;s tkrs gSaA<br />

jk"Vªh; ,oa varjkZ"Vªh; lgHkkxh ifj;kstuk;sa<br />

eq[; laLFkku djuky esa lgHkkxh dk;ZØe<br />

varjkZ"Vªh; lg;ksx<br />

• ck;kslsQksj ck;kslSykbu ¼—f’k½ okfudh% yo.kh;<br />

ijrh tehu dk uohuh—r ÅtkZ] tSo inkFkZ vkSj<br />

pkjs ds mRiknu }kjk funkuA ¼;wjksfi;u ;wfu;u<br />

}kjk izk;ksftr½<br />

• /kku dh vtSfod ncko lgu”khy çtkfr;ksa dk<br />

eq[; D;w Vh ,y ds lkFk lq[kk tyeXurk<br />

,oa yo.k lgu”khy çtkfr;ksa dk ekjdj<br />

¼Marker½ dh lgk;rk ls çtuuA ¼foKku ,oa<br />

çkS|ksfxdh foHkkx] ubZ fnYyh&vkbZvkjvkjvkbZ<br />

}kjk izk;ksftr½<br />

• vÝhdk vkSj nf{k.k ,f”k;k ds xjhc fdlkuksa ds<br />

fy, lgu”khy /kku ¼vkbZvkjvkjvkbZ&ch,eth,Q<br />

}kjk izk;ksftr½<br />

• yo.kxzLr {ks=ksa esa /kku dh mit c


lkjka’k<br />

<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

rFkk ewY;kadu ¼gfj;k.kk vkWijs”kuy ik;yV<br />

çkstsDV] —f’k foHkkx] gfj;k.kk }kjk foÙkiksf’kr½<br />

• yo.k lgu”khy Vªkaltsfud /kku dk fodkl<br />

rFkk ewY;kadu ¼ck;ks çks|kSfxdh foHkkx }kjk<br />

foÙkiksf’kr½<br />

• mÙkj if”peh Hkkjr esa Hkwfexr ty iquHkZj.k rFkk<br />

ty mRikndrk c


<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

lkjka’k<br />

esa fHkUu Qlyksa ds mRiknu gsrq mi;ksx dh<br />

O;ogkfjdrk dk v/;;u<br />

ijke'kZ lsok,sa rFkk vuqcU/kkRed vuqla/kku<br />

bl vof/k ds nkSjku laLFkku ds oSKkfudksa us<br />

v/kksfyf[kr ijke”kZ lsok,a lapkfyr dhA<br />

• egkjk’Vª dh Hkkjh e`nkvksa ds fy, lrgh ty<br />

fudkl% lh,l,lvkjvkbZ] djuky&jSDl&ikSyh<br />

,DlVªwlu izkbosV fyfeVsM lkaxyh] egkjk’Vª dk<br />

vuqca/k<br />

• th,u,Qlh dh i;kZoj.k fu;a=.k bdkbZ ls<br />

fu’dkflr mipkfjr vif”k’V rFkk ukbVªks&bVhih<br />

bdkbZ ls fu’dkflr ck;ksyksftdy Lyt dk<br />

ofVZlksy esa Qly mRiknu gsrq mi;ksx dh<br />

O;ogkfjdrk dk v/;;u % lh,l,lvkjvkbZ<br />

{ks=h; vuqla/kku dsUnz Hk:p&xqtjkr ueZnk oSyh<br />

QfVZykbtj dkWijsfVo fyfeVsM+ ueZnk] Hk:p]<br />

xqtjkr dk vuqca/k<br />

• th,u,Qlh dh ,fuyhu&VhMhvkbZ bdkbZ ls<br />

fu’dkflr mipkfjr vif”k’V dk ofVZlksy<br />

esa fHkUu Qlyksa ds mRiknu gsrq mi;ksx dh<br />

O;ogkfjdrk dk v/;;u % lh,l,lvkjvkbZ<br />

{ks=h; vuqla/kku dsUnz Hk:p&xqtjkr ueZnk oSyh<br />

QfVZykbtj dkWijsfVo fyfeVsM+ ueZnk] Hk:p]<br />

xqtjkr dk vuqca/k<br />

izdk'ku<br />

laLFkku ds oSKkfud }kjk mPp Lrjh; tuyZl esa<br />

40 vuqla/kku ys[k 35 cqd pSiVlZ] 4 iqLrdsa] 9<br />

cqysfVu@QksYMlZ ,oa 31 iksiwyj vkfVZdy izdkf”kr<br />

fd, x,A blds vykok 47 ys[k fofHkUu laxksf’B;k¡<br />

esa çLrqr fd, x,A<br />

oSKkfudksa ds varjkZ"Vªh; nkSjs@lsok fuo`fr vkSj<br />

dk;Zxzg.k<br />

Kkuo/kZu vkSj dk;Zdq”kyrk c


<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY<br />

<strong>Central</strong> <strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Salinity</strong> <strong>Research</strong> Institute (<strong>CSSRI</strong>),<br />

Karnal, established in 1969, is a premier research<br />

institute of international status involved in<br />

conducting basic and applied researches on the<br />

reclamation and management of salt affected<br />

soils and use of poor quality water in agriculture.<br />

Nearly 6.73 million hectare soils in India are salt<br />

affected and categorised into two broad groups:<br />

alkali and saline soils. <strong>CSSRI</strong> has played a vital<br />

role in developing viable technologies for the<br />

amelioration of saline and alkali soils and use of<br />

poor quality irrigation water in different agroecological<br />

regions of the country. With a national<br />

mandate, the institute has played a crucial role in<br />

improving the livelihood security of millions of<br />

resource poor farmers owning degraded lands.<br />

Recent estimates indicate that more than 1.85<br />

million ha salt affected area has been reclaimed<br />

which is contributing about 15 million tonnes<br />

additional food grains to the central pool. Multidisciplinary<br />

research programmes at the main<br />

institute are conducted through four divisions.<br />

The major activities of the Division of <strong>Soil</strong> and<br />

Crop Management (DSCM) comprise of the<br />

collection and compilation of database on salt<br />

affected soils with adequate laboratory and<br />

field work; development of technologies for the<br />

optimal management of gypsum amended alkali<br />

soils; development of resource conservation<br />

technologies for reclaimed alkali soils; use of<br />

saline and other poor quality water for crop<br />

production, multiple use of water for multienterprize<br />

agriculture and development and<br />

promotion of agro-forestry systems in saline and<br />

alkali soils besides phyto and bioremediation<br />

approaches for salt affected soils and waters.<br />

Division of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering<br />

(DIDE) is addressing the issues relating to<br />

reclamation and management of waterlogged<br />

saline soils, monitoring and evaluation of<br />

large scale drainage projects, development and<br />

application of regional salt and water balance<br />

models, monitoring water quality of tube wells<br />

and development of technologies for ground<br />

water recharge. Division of Crop Improvement<br />

(DCI) focusses on the development of high<br />

yielding genotypes of rice, wheat and mustard<br />

tolerant to salinity, alkalinity and waterlogging<br />

stresses following conventional as well as<br />

modern molecular, physiological and genetic<br />

engineering approaches. The Division of<br />

Technology Evaluation and Transfer (DTET) is<br />

involved in providing feedback on the scope,<br />

limitations and constraints and impact analyses<br />

of institute technologies in terms of livelihood<br />

security, employment generation and poverty<br />

alleviation. To address the specific research<br />

needs of different agro-climatic regions, the<br />

institute has three Regional <strong>Research</strong> Stations<br />

at Canning Town (West Bangal), Bharuch<br />

(Gujarat) and Lucknow (Uttar Pradesh) to<br />

deal with the problems of coastal salinity, salt<br />

affected vertisols and alkali soils of the central<br />

and eastern Indo-Gangetic plains with high<br />

water table, respectively. The Coordinating Unit<br />

of AICRP on Management of Salt Affected <strong>Soil</strong>s<br />

and Use of Saline Water in Agriculture is also<br />

located at the main institute and is functioning<br />

through eight research centres at Agra (Uttar<br />

Pradesh), Baptala (Andhra Pradesh), Bikaner<br />

(Rajasthan), Gangawati (Karnataka), Hisar<br />

(Haryana), Indore (Madhya Pradesh), Kanpur<br />

(Uttar Pradesh) and Tiruchirapalli (Tamil Nadu)<br />

representing different agro-ecological regions of<br />

the country. Significant research achievements<br />

of the institute during <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong> are summarised<br />

below:<br />

Evaluation of resource conservation<br />

technologies in rice–wheat cropping system<br />

In the Indo-Gangetic plains, continuous ricewheat<br />

cropping sequence in light textured soils<br />

has weakened the natural resources. A long-term<br />

experiment was initiated to address some of the<br />

problems faced by the farmers in managing the<br />

natural resources for increasing the rice-wheat<br />

productivity. In rabi, the maximum yield of<br />

wheat was recorded when wheat was sown in<br />

reduced tillage with rice residue incorporation<br />

(5.58 t ha -1 ) followed by zero tillage (5.54 t ha -1 ).<br />

Residual effects of crop residue incorporation<br />

increased the wheat grain yield by 7.0 per cent<br />

8


<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

Executive summary<br />

in conventional wheat sowing and 6.0 per cent<br />

under reduced tillage cultivation. Sowing of<br />

wheat in zero tillage in rice residue increased<br />

the grain yields by 8.0 per cent in comparison to<br />

wheat in zero tillage without residue. The results<br />

revealed that crop residue incorporation or<br />

retention increased the grain yields by improving<br />

the soil health. During kharif season, the yield of<br />

rice (cv.Ariz 6179) ranged from 5.5 to 8.6 t ha -1<br />

in different treatments. The maximum yield was<br />

obtained in conventional rice transplanting after<br />

sesbania green manuring (8.6 t ha -1 ) followed by<br />

conventional transplanting with wheat residue<br />

incorporation (8.2 t ha -1 ). The maximum water<br />

productivity was obtained in conventional rice<br />

transplanting after sesbania green manuring (0.59<br />

kg m -3 ). Maximum water saving of applied water<br />

was recorded in direct seeded rice + sesbania (34.0<br />

%) followed by direct seeded rice in different<br />

treatments (29.0 %). The water saving in raised<br />

bed transplanting was 21.0 per cent.<br />

Efficient use of organic waste material as<br />

mulching in maize-wheat cropping system in<br />

reclaimed sodic soils<br />

Performance of maize-wheat was evaluated<br />

under various planting methods and mulching<br />

with different waste materials. Planting method<br />

did not have any effect on grain and straw yield<br />

of wheat and maize crops. The productivity<br />

of maize-wheat system was almost same (8.10<br />

t ha -1 ) under flat and bed planting methods but<br />

bed planting saved 24 per cent irrigation water<br />

over flat planting. The grain yield of wheat was<br />

significantly higher when mulching was done<br />

with Jatropha (4.48 t ha -1 ) over no mulching (4.05 t<br />

ha -1 ). In the case of maize, mulching with brassica<br />

(4.18 t ha -1 ), sesbania (4.12 t ha -1 ) and Jatropha<br />

(4.05 t ha -1 ) produced significantly higher grain<br />

yield over no mulching (3.47 t ha -1 ). Mulching<br />

registered higher water productivity than no<br />

mulching in maize-wheat cropping system.<br />

Microbial bioremediation of wastewater for<br />

heavy metals<br />

Biomass of microbes acts as adsorbent to<br />

remove heavy metals from wastewater. The<br />

ability to remove heavy metals from wastewater<br />

varies greatly among microbes. Trichoderma<br />

longibrachiatum showed higher Pb (80.50%)<br />

removal capacity at 3 per cent inoculum size and<br />

Cd (89.85%) and Ni (59.20%) removal capacity<br />

at 2 per cent inoculum size. Bacilus cereus<br />

showed higher Pb (55.90%) and Ni (40.75%)<br />

removal capacity at 2.5 per cent inoculum size.<br />

Bacilus sp. showed higher Cd (39.60%) removal<br />

capacity at 0.5 per cent inoculum size from<br />

nutrient broth containing 20 ppm of Cd. There<br />

was higher removal of Cr, Cu and Ni from<br />

industrial effluents by microbial consortium in<br />

combination with press mud.<br />

Effect of water and salinity stress on the<br />

performance of tree species<br />

<strong>Soil</strong> pH, water quality and irrigation schedules<br />

did not influence the height, collar diameter<br />

and total biomass of different tree species viz;<br />

Prosopis alba, Prosopis juliflora, Acacia nilotica,<br />

Tamarix articulata, and Eucalyptus significantly<br />

upto first six months. Thereafter, these growth<br />

parameters varied significantly. After one<br />

year of growth and development, irrigation<br />

scheduled at IW/CPE ratio 1.0 and above<br />

gave significantly higher collar diameter, total<br />

biomass and height of different trees. Irrigation<br />

with normal water recorded better growth<br />

and developmental parameters as compared<br />

to irrigation with saline water of 5 dS m -1 . No<br />

significant differences were noticed in soil<br />

organic carbon, NO 3<br />

-N and NH 4<br />

-N status of<br />

the soils growing these trees. Growth and<br />

development of Eucalyptus was influenced by<br />

irrigation schedules and not by the water quality.<br />

While predicting the salt dynamics through the<br />

soil profiles, it was observed that the Gapon’s<br />

selectivity coefficient performs far much better<br />

than the other approaches in establishing the<br />

ESR-SAR relationships through the soils of<br />

varying pH and compositions. For predicting<br />

the sodium dynamics through the soils columns<br />

conceptual layer model performed better than<br />

the mechanistic model.<br />

Wheat improvement for waterlogging, salinity<br />

and element toxicities<br />

Waterlogging reduces the grain yield and<br />

biomass in sodic soils. However, there was<br />

9


Executive summary <strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

differential response of waterlogging with<br />

respect to different genotypes. The genotypes<br />

KRL 3-4, KRL 99 and Kharchia 65 showed good<br />

waterlogging tolerance in microplots as well<br />

as under field conditions. Among Indian and<br />

Australian genotypes, a lot of variability was<br />

observed with respect to waterlogging tolerance<br />

in sodic soils. Out of the three populations<br />

studied in sodic soils, the performance of<br />

PBW 525/KRL 99 was the best with respect to<br />

phenotypic performance under waterlogging<br />

and resistance to rusts. This population will be<br />

advanced further as per modified sub surface<br />

drainage protocol.<br />

Using biological sludge from Nitro-ETP plant<br />

and treated effluent for crop production on<br />

vertisols<br />

Environmental pollution is the major problem<br />

associated with rapid industrialisation,<br />

urbanisation and changing life styles.<br />

Industrialisation also causes serious problems<br />

relating to environmental pollution by<br />

producing solid/liquid wastes. An attempt has<br />

been made to explore and identify the feasibility<br />

of using biological sludge generated from<br />

Nitro-ETP plant of Gujarat Narmada Valley<br />

Fertilizer Company, Bharuch in comparison<br />

to organic manures (OM) and their effect on<br />

crop performance and soil properties. Field<br />

experiments were conducted with cowpea,<br />

cluster bean, Amaranthus and okra to ascertain<br />

the response of biological sludge alone and in<br />

combination with organic manures viz; farm<br />

yard manure (FYM) and vermi compost (VC).<br />

The results showed that the biological sludge<br />

due to the presence of important nutrients like<br />

nitrogen, phosphorus etc. form ideal alternative<br />

nutrient source that meet the partial nutrient<br />

requirement of the crops. The studies revealed<br />

that the use of biological sludge helped in<br />

improving the soil properties.<br />

Use of available brackish and fresh water in<br />

the coastal areas for integrated cultivation of<br />

crops and fishes<br />

A study was undertaken to increase the crop<br />

productivity and cropping intensity in the<br />

coastal area through rainwater harvesting and<br />

integrated crop-fish cultivation by utilizing<br />

natural water resources. For this purpose, an<br />

area of 2 ha at <strong>CSSRI</strong>, RRS, Canning town farm<br />

was reshaped into five different land shaping<br />

models namely Paddy-cum-fish (PCF), PCFbrackishwater<br />

fishery, Farm pond, Deep ridge<br />

and furrow, Shallow furrow and medium ridge.<br />

Based on the experiments conducted during<br />

2009-10, economics of various land shaping<br />

models were calculated and the farm pond<br />

model emerged as the most profitable land<br />

shaping model with highest Benefit-Cost ratio<br />

of 2.33 followed by paddy-cum-fish, deep ridge<br />

and furrow ridge, shallow furrow and medium<br />

ridge and paddy-cum-brackish water fish. All<br />

the land shaping models generated higher net<br />

returns over the control. Integrated crop-fish<br />

cultivation through land shaping has substantial<br />

scope in coastal agriculture. Besides, increasing<br />

productivity of land and water, It increases<br />

income of the farmers, provided irrigation<br />

facility, resulted in reduction of salinity buildup<br />

in soil and improved drainage condition.<br />

Effect of waterlogging on tree species for agroforestry<br />

system in coastal salt affected soils<br />

Diversification of agriculture through<br />

introduction of agroforestry systems in lowlying<br />

salt affected areas may enhance the farm<br />

income vis-a-vis livelihood security of the<br />

farming communities of the coastal region.<br />

However, growing of tree species in most of the<br />

coastal land is quite impossible as it remains<br />

waterlogged for 5 months during monsoon and<br />

post-monsoon periods. Therefore, for growing<br />

tree species, low-lying land was reshaped<br />

to different heights under this experiment.<br />

Seven tree species viz; Eucalyptus sp., Acacia<br />

auriculiformis, Casuarina sp., Syzygium cumini,<br />

Heritiera fomes, Brugeria gymnorhiza and<br />

Xylocarpus mekongensis were evaluated for<br />

their suitability under 4 waterlogged situations<br />

(during Kharif ) viz; lowland (upto 50 cm<br />

waterlogging), medium lowland (upto 25 cm<br />

waterlogging), medium upland (5 cm above<br />

water level) and upland (35 cm above water<br />

level). Waterlogging during kharif season affected<br />

the growth of all the tree species evaluated.<br />

However, Syzygium, Casuarina, Heritieria and<br />

Xylocarpus survived initially but died gradually<br />

up to 4 th year of experiment under low land<br />

10


<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

Executive summary<br />

situation where continuous waterlogging<br />

prevailed throughout the kharif season. Though<br />

Acacia, Eucalyptus and Brugeria survived even in<br />

5 th year of experimentation, their survival rate<br />

was very low (20-30%). The height and diameter<br />

of these tree species increased gradually from<br />

low land to upland situations, the highest being<br />

in upland situation.<br />

Stress tolerant rice for poor farmers in coastal<br />

region of West Bangal<br />

Selection of salt tolerant rice varieties in<br />

kharif season in coastal region was conducted<br />

under participatory mode involving farmers,<br />

farm women and scientists. Farmers showed<br />

considerable wisdom in selection of varieties.<br />

Choice of varieties was not driven by the yield<br />

factor alone. Several other factors such as grain<br />

type and quality, duration, straw yield and<br />

plant height were also major factors influencing<br />

selection of the rice varieties. Participatory<br />

Varietal Selection was conducted at different<br />

locations (Canning, Chandkhali, Nikarighata,<br />

Nimpith and Koikhali) in Sundarbans region.<br />

From the analysis, it was found that the most<br />

preferred rice varieties were CSRC (S) 21-2-5-<br />

B-1-1 and Gitanjali in kharif and Bidhan-2 and<br />

Canning 7 in rabi season.<br />

Economic impact of zero tillage technology in<br />

reclaimed sodic soils<br />

Zero tillage technology is probably one of the<br />

best ways to reduce the cost of cultivation and<br />

sustaining productivity of natural resources like<br />

soil and water. It reduces input cost, sustains<br />

yield, enhances profitability, improves soil<br />

nutrients and offers benefits of retained surface<br />

residues and reduced soil and water losses.<br />

Results of the study, based on zero tillage<br />

practice adopted at <strong>CSSRI</strong> farm during the<br />

year 2009-10 for <strong>11</strong> crops, indicated that on an<br />

average there was 40% saving of human labour,<br />

60 % saving of machine power, 25 % saving<br />

of irrigation water in zero as compared to<br />

conventional tillage. On an average, there was<br />

30 per cent reduction in the cost of cultivation<br />

under zero tillage as compared to conventional<br />

method of crop production.<br />

Awards and recognition<br />

• The Indian Council of Agricultural <strong>Research</strong><br />

(ICAR) has bestowed its prestigious Sadar<br />

Patel Best Institute Award -2009 to the<br />

Institute<br />

• The Indian Council of Agricultural <strong>Research</strong><br />

(ICAR) has bestowed its prestigious Ganesh<br />

Sankar Vidhyarthi Hindi Krishi Patrika<br />

Pursakar–2009 to the magazine Krishi Kiran<br />

(Vol. 3) published by <strong>CSSRI</strong>, Karnal<br />

• The Institute has been bestowed with the<br />

National Groundwater Augmentation Award<br />

(20<strong>11</strong>) on Enhancement of Groundwater<br />

Recharge and Water Productivity in<br />

North West India by the Ministry of Water<br />

Resources (Govt. of India).<br />

Workshop, Seminar,Training, Foundation Day<br />

and Kisan Mela organised<br />

st<br />

• 41 Foundation day of the Institute was<br />

celebrated on August 18, <strong>2010</strong>. Dr. B.<br />

Mishra, Vice-Chancellor, Sher-e-Kashmir<br />

University of Agricultural Sciences and<br />

Technology, Jammu was the Chief Guest.<br />

42 nd foundation day was also celebrated<br />

on March 1, 20<strong>11</strong>. Dr. N.K. Tyagi, Member,<br />

ASRB was the Chief Guest<br />

• A kharif kisan mela on 8 th October, <strong>2010</strong> and rabi<br />

kisan mela on March 1, 20<strong>11</strong> was organized.<br />

More than 1500 farmers and students<br />

benefited from these melas. Seeds of different<br />

crop varieties were sold during the melas<br />

• Two days awareness programme for the<br />

farmers of Palwal (Haryana) was organised<br />

on Reclamation Technologies for Salt<br />

Affected <strong>Soil</strong>s during October 25-26, <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

Thirty farmers were participated in this<br />

programme<br />

• A National Symposium on Recent Outlook<br />

on Sustainable Agriculture, Livelihood<br />

Security and Ecology of Coastal Region’<br />

was organized by The Indian Society of<br />

Coastal Agricultural <strong>Research</strong> (ISCAR)<br />

from October 27-30, <strong>2010</strong> at Calangute, Goa<br />

<strong>11</strong>


Executive summary <strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

in collaboration with Dr Balasaheb Sawant<br />

Konkan Krishi Vidyapeeth, Ratnagiri,<br />

Dapoli, Maharashtra (Host University)<br />

• A model training course on Integrated<br />

Water Resources Management and Use<br />

of Poor Quality Water in Agriculture for<br />

Subject-Matter-Specialist/Officers of State<br />

Development Departments was organized<br />

from November 23-30, <strong>2010</strong>. In this training,<br />

21 officers from 10 states were participated<br />

• International training programme on Use<br />

of Poor Quality Water in Agriculture for<br />

AARDO (Afro-Asian Rural Development<br />

Organization) was organized from December<br />

1-14, <strong>2010</strong>. Seven delegates from Malaysia,<br />

Yemen, Syria, Iraq, Oman, Mauritius, and<br />

Bangladesh were participated<br />

• A farmers training and awareness<br />

programme on the Protection of Plant<br />

Varieties and Farmers Right was organized<br />

on December 28, <strong>2010</strong> in which about 100<br />

farmers and scientists participated<br />

Field exhibitions and visits<br />

Seven exhibitions on reclamation and<br />

management of salt affected soils and use of poor<br />

quality waters in agriculture were organized.<br />

Farmers and extension personnel visited the stalls<br />

and acquainted themselves with technologies<br />

developed by the Institute. During the year, 716<br />

farmers in 17 groups, 82 extension personnel in<br />

10 groups, 489 agriculture graduates in 7 groups<br />

and 10 scientists in 2 groups from India and<br />

abroad visited the Institute.<br />

Advisory services to the stakeholders<br />

A toll free telephone number 18001801014 is<br />

in operation at the institute. Large number of<br />

queries related to reclamation and management<br />

of sodic and saline soils, use of poor quality<br />

water and salt tolerant varieties of different<br />

crops are being raised by the farmer. They are<br />

being replied by the institute’s scientists.<br />

National and International Collaborative<br />

Projects<br />

International Collaborations<br />

• BIOSAFOR-BIOSALINE (AGRO)<br />

FORESTRY: Remediation of saline<br />

wastelands through production of<br />

renewable energy, biomaterials and fodder<br />

(Funded by European Union)<br />

• Stress tolerant rice for poor farmers of Africa<br />

and South Asia (Funded by IRRI-BMGF)<br />

• Enhancing and stabilizing the productivity<br />

of salt affected areas by incorporating<br />

genes for tolerance of abiotic stresses in rice<br />

(Funded by BMZ-IRRI)<br />

• Wheat improvement for waterlogging,<br />

salinity and element toxicities in Australia<br />

and India (sponsored by ACIAR, Australia)<br />

• Cereal systems initiative for South Asia<br />

(CSISA) (sponsored by IRRI Philippines<br />

and CIMMYT Mexico)<br />

• Marker assisted breeding of abiotic stress<br />

tolerant rice varieties with major QTL for<br />

drought, submergence and salt tolerance<br />

(DBT-India-IRRI)<br />

National Collaborations<br />

• Transgenics in crops-salinity tolerance<br />

in rice: functional genomics component<br />

(Funded by ICAR)<br />

• Monitoring and evaluation of large-scale<br />

subsurface drainage projects in the state of<br />

Haryana( Funded by Haryana Operational<br />

Pilot Project, DOA, Haryana)<br />

• Development and evaluation of salt tolerant<br />

transgenic rice (Funded by Department of<br />

Bio-technology)<br />

• Farmers’ participatory research on<br />

enhancing groundwater recharge and water<br />

productivity in North-West India (Funded<br />

by Ministry of Water Resources, GOI)<br />

• Control of waterlogging and salinity<br />

through agroforestry interventions (Funded<br />

by INCID)<br />

• Multi-locational evaluation of bread wheat<br />

germplasm (Funded by NBPGR)<br />

• AMAAS-Application of micro-organism in<br />

agriculture and allied sectors (Funded by<br />

ICAR)<br />

• Intellectual property management and<br />

transfer/commercialization of agricultural<br />

technology system (Funded by ICAR)<br />

12


<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

Executive summary<br />

• Development of spectral reflectance<br />

methods and low cost sensors for real<br />

time applications of variable rate inputs in<br />

precision farming (Funded by NAIP)<br />

• Network project on improvement of<br />

salt tolerance in wheat using molecular<br />

approach (DWR-<strong>CSSRI</strong>)<br />

• Decision support system for enhancing<br />

productivity in irrigated saline environment<br />

using remote sensing modelling and GIS<br />

(Funded by NAIP)<br />

Collaborative programmes at Regional<br />

<strong>Research</strong> Station, Canning Town<br />

International Collaborations<br />

• International collaborative programme on<br />

testing rice germplasm for coastal salinity<br />

(IRSSTN) with IRRI, Philippines<br />

• Advanced cultures on rice for shallow<br />

and deep water situations with IRRI,<br />

Philippines<br />

• IRRI-BMZ Project on incorporation of salt<br />

tolerance gene in rice<br />

National Collaborations<br />

• Coastal salinity tolerant varietal trial<br />

(CSTVT) with DRR, Hyderabad<br />

• Strategies for sustainable management<br />

of degraded coastal land and water for<br />

enhancing livelihood security of farming<br />

communities (NAIP GFF Funding )<br />

Collaborative programmes at Regional<br />

<strong>Research</strong> Station, Lucknow<br />

International Collaborations<br />

• Stress tolerant rice for poor farmers of Africa<br />

and South Asia (Funded by IRRI-BMGF)<br />

National Collaborations<br />

• Holistic approach for improved livelihood<br />

security through livestock based farming<br />

system in Barabanki and Rai Bareily districts<br />

of U.P. ( Funded by NAIP)<br />

Collaborative programmes at Regional<br />

<strong>Research</strong> Station, Bharuch<br />

National Collaborations<br />

• Feasibility study using biological sludge<br />

from Nitro-ETP Plant and treated effluent<br />

from Environmental Control Unit 1 of<br />

GNFC for crop production on Vertisols<br />

(GNVFC, Bharuch)<br />

• Feasibility studies on the use of treated<br />

effluent from Aniline-TDI Plant of GNFC<br />

Unit II in diverse crop interventions on<br />

Vertisols (GNVFC, Bharuch)<br />

Consultancies and Contractual <strong>Research</strong><br />

The institute scientists conducted following<br />

consultancies during theyear under report<br />

• Subsurface drainage for heavy soils of<br />

Maharashtra : <strong>CSSRI</strong>, Karnal- Rex-Poly<br />

Extrusion Pvt. Ltd., Sangli, Maharashtra<br />

• Feasiability study using biological sludge<br />

from Nitro-ETP Plant and treated effluent<br />

from environmental control unit 1 of GNFC<br />

for crop production on vertisols : <strong>CSSRI</strong>,<br />

RRS, Bharuch- The Gujarat Narmada Velley<br />

Fertiliser Co. Ltd. Narmada Nagar, Bharuch,<br />

Gujarat<br />

• Feasiability studies on the use of treated<br />

effluent from Aniline-TDI Plant of GNFC<br />

Unit-<strong>11</strong> in diverse crop interventions on<br />

vertisols : <strong>CSSRI</strong>, RRS, Bharuch- The Gujarat<br />

Narmada Velley Fertiliser Co. Ltd. Narmada<br />

Nagar, Bharuch, Gujarat<br />

Publications<br />

The Institute scientists published 40 research<br />

papers in peer reviewed journals, 35 book<br />

chapters, 4 books, 9 bulletins/folders, 38 popular<br />

articles besides 47 papers were presented in<br />

seminar/symposia and conferences.<br />

Scientists visits abroad, retired and joined<br />

To upgrade the knowledge and skills, 12 scientists<br />

of the institute visited different countries viz;<br />

USA, Australia, Thailand, Canada, United<br />

Kingdom, Tanzania, Brazil, Spain, Germany,<br />

Bangladesh and Vietnam. Two scientists have<br />

superannuated and 2 joined during the period<br />

under report.<br />

13


Introduction <strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Historical Perspective<br />

<strong>Central</strong> <strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Salinity</strong> <strong>Research</strong> Institute (<strong>CSSRI</strong>)<br />

is a premier research institute dedicated to<br />

pursue interdisciplinary research on salinity/<br />

alkalinity management and use of poor quality<br />

irrigation waters in different agro-ecological<br />

zones of the country. The Govt. of India<br />

constituted an Indo-American Team to assist<br />

the Indian Council of Agricultural <strong>Research</strong> to<br />

develop a comprehensive water management<br />

programme for the country. As a follow up<br />

of these recommendations, it was decided to<br />

establish the <strong>Central</strong> <strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Salinity</strong> <strong>Research</strong><br />

Institute under Fourth Plan period. The Institute<br />

started functioning at Hisar (Haryana) on 1 st<br />

March, 1969. Later on, it was decided to shift<br />

this Institute to Karnal during October, 1969. In<br />

February 1970, the <strong>Central</strong> Rice <strong>Research</strong> Station,<br />

Canning Town, West Bengal was transferred to<br />

<strong>CSSRI</strong>, Karnal to conduct research on problems<br />

of coastal salinity. Another Regional <strong>Research</strong><br />

Station for carrying out research on problems<br />

of inland salinity prevailing in the black soil<br />

region of western parts of the country started<br />

functioning at Anand (Gujarat) from February,<br />

1989. As per recommendation of the QRT, the<br />

station was shifted from Anand to Bharuch<br />

in April 2003. Keeping in view the need of<br />

undertaking research for situations under<br />

surface drainage congestion, high water table<br />

conditions, relatively heavy textured soils,<br />

and indurated pan for managing alkali soils of<br />

<strong>Central</strong> and Eastern Gangetic Plains, another<br />

Regional Station was established during<br />

October, 1999 at Lucknow. The Coordinating<br />

Unit of AICRP on Management of Salt Affected<br />

<strong>Soil</strong>s and Use of Saline Water in Agriculture<br />

is located at the Institute with a network of<br />

eight research centres located in different agroecological<br />

regions of the country (Agra, Bapatala,<br />

Bikaner, Gangawati, Hisar, Indore, Kanpur<br />

and Tiruchirapalli). The Coordinating Unit of<br />

AICRP on Water Management functioned at the<br />

Institute from early seventies till it was shifted<br />

to Rahuri (Maharastra) in 1990.<br />

The Institute has grown into an internationally<br />

recognised esteemed centre of excellence in<br />

salinity research. Multidisciplinary research<br />

activities at the main institute are being<br />

strengthened through four research divisions.<br />

The major research activities in the Division of<br />

<strong>Soil</strong> and Crop Management include preparation<br />

and digitization of database on salt affected<br />

soils besides periodic assessment of state of<br />

soil resources, developing technologies for the<br />

optimal management of gypsum amended alkali<br />

soils and the use of high RSC and saline waters for<br />

crop production. In the post reclamation phase,<br />

focus is on developing resource conservation<br />

technologies and development of farming<br />

system models for resource poor farmers. Agroforestry<br />

on salt affected soils is another area of<br />

focus besides the production and evaluation of<br />

bio-fuel and bio-energy efficient plants from salt<br />

affected soils. Development and propagation<br />

of individual farmer based groundwater<br />

recharge technologies, subsurface drainage for<br />

amelioration of waterlogged saline soils and<br />

decision support systems for ground water<br />

contaminations are some of the major issues<br />

being addressed in the Division of Irrigation and<br />

Drainage Engineering. Development of high<br />

yielding genotypes of rice, wheat and mustard<br />

tolerant to salinity, alkalinity and waterlogging<br />

stresses by following conventional breeding and<br />

modern molecular and physiological approaches<br />

are the major concerns of the Division of Crop<br />

Improvement. The Division of Technology<br />

Evaluation and Transfer is studying constraints<br />

in the adoption of land reclamation technologies<br />

and their impact on rural development.<br />

The Institute has developed technologies for<br />

the reclamation of alkali soils with the addition<br />

of chemical amendments, reclamation of saline<br />

soils through subsurface drainage, development<br />

and release of salt tolerant crop varieties of rice,<br />

wheat and mustard and the reclamation of salt<br />

affected soils through salt tolerant trees. As such,<br />

nearly 1.5 million ha salt affected lands have been<br />

reclaimed and put to productive use. It has been<br />

estimated that reclaimed area is contributing<br />

14


<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

Introduction<br />

more than 15 million tonnes foodgrains to the<br />

national pool. For waterlogged saline soils,<br />

subsurface drainage technology developed by<br />

the Institute initially for Haryana has been widely<br />

adopted and replicated in Rajasthan, Gujarat,<br />

Andhra Pradesh, Maharastra and Karnataka.<br />

About 60,000 ha waterlogged saline areas have<br />

been reclaimed using this technology. Artificial<br />

groundwater recharge is another area of interest<br />

for regions with depleting wter table. Besides,<br />

the technologies are also being developed for<br />

the salt affected areas of vertisols and coastal<br />

regions of the country.<br />

An International Training Centre to impart<br />

training at national and international level was<br />

established during 2001 under Indo-Dutch<br />

collaborative research programme. The Institute<br />

has developed Post Graduate Education<br />

programme in association with State Agricultural<br />

Universities (SAUs), Indian Institute of<br />

Technology (IIT) and other Universities, which<br />

has contributed to the growth of the Institute<br />

substantially. The Institute has several national<br />

and international projects to fund its research<br />

and development activities. The notable<br />

programmes include: IRRI sponsored rice<br />

improvement programme, ACIAR sponsored<br />

programme for wheat improvement and IRRI,<br />

Philippines and CIMMYT, Mexico sponsored<br />

programme of cereal based systems.<br />

<strong>Central</strong> <strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Salinity</strong> <strong>Research</strong> Institute, Karnal<br />

has created state of the art facilities of sodic<br />

and saline micro-plots. Depending upon the<br />

objectives, desired stress levels of sodicity and<br />

salinity can be created in this facility for screening<br />

and better genotypic comparisons. Similarly, an<br />

environmentally controlled glass house facility<br />

is in place for growing crops and screening their<br />

genetic resources during off-season. This allows<br />

precise screening under saline hydroponics and<br />

advancement of breeding generation. Transgenic<br />

Green House facility has been created at <strong>CSSRI</strong><br />

in the year 2008 under Indo-US ABSPII program.<br />

A central laboratory with modern equipments<br />

has been established at the institute.<br />

Mandate<br />

The mandate of the Institute, as approved by<br />

the ICAR, is as follows:<br />

• To undertake basic and applied research<br />

for generating appropriate agrochemical/<br />

biological/hydraulic technologies for<br />

reclamation and management of salt<br />

affected soils and use of poor quality<br />

irrigation waters for sustainable production<br />

in different agro-ecological zones<br />

• To evolve, evaluate and recommend<br />

strategies that promote adoption of<br />

preventive/ameliorative technology<br />

• To be a nucleus of research on salinity<br />

management and coordinate/support<br />

the network of research with universities,<br />

institutions and agencies in the country<br />

for generating and testing location specific<br />

technologies<br />

• To act as a centre for training in salinity<br />

researches in the country and region and<br />

provide consultancy<br />

• To act as repository of information on<br />

resource inventories and management of<br />

salt affected soils and waters<br />

• To collaborate with relevant national and<br />

international agencies in achieving the<br />

above goals<br />

Organogram<br />

The current organisational set up for<br />

implementing its research programmes is<br />

shown below.<br />

Experimental Farm<br />

<strong>Research</strong> Farm, Karnal<br />

Agricultural farm at <strong>CSSRI</strong>, Karnal has a total<br />

area of 82 ha. A motorable road has been laid<br />

all along the boundary of this farm for regular<br />

monitoring, upkeep and proper watch and<br />

ward. Whole area of the farm under cultivation<br />

has been divided and laid out in standard plot<br />

size of 1.0 ha and each plot is connected with<br />

road for easy accessibility, underground water<br />

conveyance and lined channels for irrigation.<br />

15


Introduction <strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

Eight tube wells have been installed in the farm<br />

to meet irrigation water requirement of general<br />

agriculture, research experiments and water<br />

supply in the campus and laboratories. All<br />

essential farm machinery and implements are<br />

available, most farm operations are mechanized.<br />

To achieve the optimization of water and other<br />

inputs, all the plots are precisely leveled with<br />

laser leveler at regular intervals. Combination<br />

of different cropping systems is being practiced<br />

to optimize land use in the farm. Agro-forestry<br />

system comprising an array of tree species in<br />

combination with various arable crops covers an<br />

area of 6.5 ha. Area under research experiments<br />

during the year was 20.0 ha, while general<br />

crops covered an area of 17.5 ha. Out of the area<br />

under general crops, an area of 8.5 ha was put<br />

under seed production. To reduce the emission<br />

of GHGs, most of the area has been put under<br />

minimum tillage and no burning of residue is<br />

practiced. The productivity levels at the farm<br />

are high at evidenced from the following data.<br />

Among machinery and implements, the<br />

farm has multi-purpose crop thresher, turbo<br />

seeder, zero-till machine, laser leveler, tractors,<br />

Organisational set up of <strong>CSSRI</strong><br />

Productivity of crops at <strong>CSSRI</strong> farm<br />

Crop Variety Av. yield (t ha -1 )<br />

Rabi 2009 - 10<br />

Wheat KRL 19 4.20<br />

PBW 550 4.40<br />

HD 2894 4.49<br />

DBW 17 4.32<br />

PBW 343 4.14<br />

Mustard CS 54 1.57<br />

CS 56 1.38<br />

Gram HC 1 1.72<br />

Kharif <strong>2010</strong><br />

Paddy PUSA 44 5.34<br />

P <strong>11</strong>21 3.37<br />

CSR 30 1.89<br />

HKR 47 6.50<br />

hydraulic trolley, cleaner, shrub master and<br />

maize thresher etc. During the period under<br />

report, the farm unit has produced 26.6 and<br />

18.5 tonnes of quality seed of wheat and rice,<br />

respectively. Revenue of more than 85 lakhs was<br />

generated during the year <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong> from sale of<br />

farm produce and others.<br />

16


<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

Introduction<br />

Horticultural crops such as guava, mango,<br />

ber, aonla, jamun and litchi etc. covered an area<br />

of 7.6 ha, while fish ponds occupy another 2.5<br />

ha. An herbal garden with about 120 species<br />

of medicinal/aromatic herbs, shrubs and trees<br />

has also been established and maintained in<br />

an area of 1.4 ha for germplasm conservation.<br />

Remaining area of 26.5 ha is permanently<br />

covered under glass house, net houses, microplots,<br />

laboratories, offices, residences, oxidation<br />

pond, roads and landscape. Landscape of the<br />

whole area is looked after by farm unit.<br />

<strong>CSSRI</strong>, <strong>Research</strong> Farm, Hisar<br />

Hisar experimental farm is located on National<br />

Highway No. 10 near air strip of the town. This<br />

farm covers an area of 8.0 ha. The experiments<br />

on alternate cropping systems for development<br />

of suitable land use plans for rainfed saline<br />

groundwater regions are being conducted at<br />

Hisar. For meeting the saline water requirement,<br />

two shallow tubewells have been installed. One<br />

of the tubewell has low salinity (4-5 dS m -1 ) water<br />

while the second has water of high salinity (9-10<br />

dS m -1 ). Performance evaluation of fruit and<br />

forestry trees, medicinal and aromatic plants<br />

and different types of cactus, Prosopis, grasses,<br />

castor and Indian mustard with saline irrigation<br />

are being carried out.<br />

Finances<br />

Summary of allocation and expenditure during<br />

the year <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong> under plan and Non-plan<br />

budget along with externally funded schemes is<br />

presented below:<br />

Budget<br />

Sanctioned<br />

amount<br />

/receipts<br />

(Rs. in lakhs)<br />

Actual<br />

expenditure<br />

Non-plan 1763.00 1762.83<br />

Plan 315.00 314.49<br />

AICRP<br />

(Non-plan)<br />

AICRP<br />

(Plan)<br />

31.00 30.94<br />

325.00 324.99<br />

Total 2434.00 2433.25<br />

Staff<br />

The total staff strength of the institute is 370.<br />

The category wise details are<br />

Category of post Sanctioned In position<br />

Scientific 81 44<br />

Technical <strong>11</strong>7 108<br />

Administrative 58 52<br />

Skilled Supporting<br />

Staff<br />

Library<br />

<strong>11</strong>4 91<br />

Total 370 295<br />

The Institute library is well furnished and<br />

equipped with 4 computers. The library has<br />

total collection of 14684 books including Hindi<br />

books. A separate section is being maintained<br />

for Hindi books. There are 7967 bound volumes<br />

of the Journals. It has a rich collection of special<br />

publications of FAO, IRRI, UNESCO, ILRI, ICID,<br />

IFPRI, ASA and ASAE, which fulfils the needs<br />

of scientists, researchers, teachers and students.<br />

It subscribes to 85 Journals, out of which 63 are<br />

National and 22 International. Thirteen foreign<br />

journals are being received free online with<br />

our paid subscription for print version. Fifteen<br />

journals are being received on gratis. About 152<br />

theses on the subjects relating to soil science,<br />

agriculture engineering, water management,<br />

etc. are available. <strong>Annual</strong> reports from different<br />

Institutes and Agricultural Universities are<br />

being received from time to time. Readers are<br />

updated on fresh arrivals in the library on<br />

weekly basis. Total membership of library is 100<br />

including scientists, technical, administrative<br />

and research scholars, etc.<br />

The library works as a repository center where<br />

Institute’s publications such as <strong>Salinity</strong> News,<br />

Technical Bulletins, <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong>s, Brochures,<br />

etc. are stocked and sent to <strong>Research</strong> Institutes,<br />

Agricultural Universities, NAAS, QRT and RAC<br />

members, etc. and also distributed amongst the<br />

visiting farmers. The library also have 10 priced<br />

publications which are supplied on payment<br />

basis. The library provides services like Internet<br />

surfing, exploring, downloading and literature<br />

search through CDs like SOIL, AGRIS and Plant<br />

17


Introduction <strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

Gene. Internet access facility through CERA<br />

consortium for journals is also available. Interlibrary<br />

loan facility is also provided as per<br />

requirements. The library has been modernized,<br />

barcoded and computerized by using advanced<br />

software LS Ease/LIBSYS version 6.0.<br />

Laboratories<br />

Well equipped laboratories for undertaking<br />

research on various aspects of salinity<br />

management are in place with some of the<br />

advanced facilities like Atomic Absorption<br />

Spectro-photometer, Inductively coupled<br />

plasma (ICP), Carbon-Nitrogen-Hydrogen-<br />

Sulpher Analyser (CNHS), Ion Chromograph,<br />

UV VIS Spectrophotometer, HPLC, Radio meter,<br />

Kjeltek N- analyser, EM <strong>Salinity</strong> Probe, Neutron<br />

Moisturemeter, Scientillation Counter, Growth<br />

Chamber etc. Large number of screen houses<br />

and microplots are also available for precision<br />

experimental works. The facilities of image<br />

processing and interpreting satellite imageries<br />

and geographical information system are also<br />

available. Recently, a multimedia laboratory<br />

has also been established to cater to the need of<br />

photographic and image processing and power<br />

point presentation etc.<br />

Allied Facilities<br />

A conference hall, seminar room and an<br />

auditorium with modern facilities are available<br />

for scientific meetings and group discussions.<br />

The institute has a museum with exhibits<br />

depicting salient research findings and the latest<br />

technologies developed at the institute. The<br />

museum is being upgraded with addition of new<br />

exhibits and state of art display infrastructure/<br />

material. An international guest house and a<br />

scientists hostel with boarding facilities caters to<br />

the need of scientists and other visitors. Besides,<br />

there is an extension hostel for students and<br />

trainees. A dispensary with physiotherapy unit<br />

is also available in the institute. A sports complex<br />

consisting of playgrounds for football, hockey,<br />

cricket, volley ball, lawn tennis court etc. besides<br />

indoor facilities for table tennis, chess, carom and<br />

badminton are available in the institute. The staff<br />

recreation club functions to meet the recreational<br />

requirements of the staff. Besides this, a Staff<br />

Welfare Club is also functioning actively for the<br />

welfare of the <strong>CSSRI</strong> staff.<br />

<br />

18


<strong>Research</strong> Achievements


<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

DATABASE ON SALT AFFECTED SOILS<br />

Digital Database of Salt Affected <strong>Soil</strong>s<br />

using Geographic Information System (A.K.<br />

Mandal)<br />

Geo-referenced maps of salt affected soils<br />

in digital format are more useful than<br />

analogue maps printed on cartographic<br />

sheets. Digitization of salt affected soils was<br />

accomplished for fifteen states based on the<br />

salt affected soils maps (NRSA and associates<br />

1997) on 1:250,000 scale using ILWIS software.<br />

These maps were compiled in GIS to prepare a<br />

digital mosaic of salt affected soils map for the<br />

country scale (Fig. 1). The map legend consists<br />

of codes and descriptions for soils depicting<br />

nature of salts. The criteria for categorizing soil<br />

salinity was the ranges of ECe (4-8, 8-30 and<br />

>30 dS m -1 ), pHs (9.0) and<br />

ESP (40) values. Different codes<br />

were used to describe the physiographic units.<br />

Fifteen categories of soils identified includes<br />

three categories of saline (s 1<br />

, s 2<br />

and s 3<br />

), three of<br />

sodic (n 1<br />

, n 2<br />

and n 3<br />

) and nine of saline-sodic soils<br />

(s 1<br />

n 1<br />

, s 1<br />

n 2<br />

, s 1<br />

n 3<br />

, s 2<br />

n 1<br />

, s 2<br />

n 2<br />

, s 2<br />

n 3<br />

, s 3<br />

n 1<br />

, s 3<br />

n 2<br />

and s 3<br />

n 3<br />

).<br />

Keeping in view the scale limitation and the<br />

soil management aspects, these categories were<br />

merged and two categories of salt affected soils<br />

viz; saline and sodic were made. An area of 6.73<br />

million ha (Table 1) was estimated salt affected,<br />

of which 3.77 and 2.95 million ha are sodic and<br />

saline, respectively.<br />

Saline soils: Saline soils are distributed in<br />

inland and coastal regions associated with arid/<br />

semi-arid and humid climates. These soils are<br />

commonly found in Andhra Pradesh, West<br />

Bengal, Orissa, Tamil Nadu and Andaman and<br />

Nicobar islands on the east coast covering an<br />

area of 756239 ha (<strong>11</strong>.2%) and Gujarat, Kerala,<br />

Karnataka and Maharashtra on the west coast of<br />

India covering 634958 ha (9.4%). The presence<br />

of heavy textured soil, poor drainage condition,<br />

poor quality of ground water and lack of<br />

good quality irrigation water enhance salinity<br />

development in this region.<br />

Sodic soils: These soils are occurring in various<br />

physiographic units such as aeofluvial/aeolian/<br />

arid (B), coastal (D), alluvial (A) and others<br />

(H) plains in north-west India and peninsular<br />

(F) plains in central and southern India. Data<br />

showed the distribution of salt affected soils<br />

in diverse physiographic regions and agroclimatic<br />

conditions and the soil characteristics<br />

are variable and complex in nature.<br />

Nationwide Mapping of Land Degradation<br />

using Multi-temporal Satellite Data (A.K.<br />

Mandal)<br />

Mapping and characterization of salt affected<br />

soils in Haryana using remote sensing<br />

Fig.1 : Salt affected soils in India<br />

The Cheeka block of Kurukshetra district was<br />

surveyed for the assessment of land The IRS<br />

LISS III data for Feb.-March, May-June and<br />

October-November 2005-06 were interpreted<br />

visually and incidences of waterlogging and soil<br />

salinization/alkalization on bare soil surface and<br />

stressed vegetation cover were identified. Based<br />

on the visual interpretation of IRS data, ground<br />

truth was conducted to verify and authenticate<br />

interpreted units. Based on the ground truth<br />

21


Database on salt affected soils <strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

Table 1: Distribution of salt affected soils in physiographic regions in different states of India<br />

Physiographic units<br />

Sr.<br />

N.<br />

States<br />

1. Andhra<br />

Pardesh<br />

2.<br />

Andaman<br />

& Nicobar<br />

Alluvial<br />

plain<br />

(A)<br />

Aeo-fluvial/<br />

Aeolian/<br />

Arid<br />

plain (B)<br />

Deltaic<br />

plain<br />

(C)<br />

Coastal<br />

plain<br />

(D)<br />

Mud flats/<br />

Mangrove<br />

Swamps<br />

(G)<br />

Peninsular<br />

plain<br />

(F)<br />

Others<br />

(H)<br />

Total<br />

Area<br />

(ha)<br />

- - - 56423 25<strong>11</strong>1 192673 - 274207<br />

- - - 12366 64634 - - 77000<br />

3. Bihar 153153 - - - - - - 153153<br />

4 Gujarat 510951 285574 - 462315 - - 963160 2222000<br />

5. Haryana 232556 - - - - - - 232556<br />

6. Karnataka 148922 - - 586 - 521 - 150029<br />

7. Kerala - - - 20000 - - - 20000<br />

8. Maharashtra - - 43023 6719 283 599757 496 606759<br />

9.<br />

Madhya<br />

Pradesh<br />

- - - - - 139720 - 139720<br />

10. Orissa - - - 79543 24572 - - 147138<br />

<strong>11</strong>. Punjab 151717 - - - - - - 151717<br />

12. Rajasthan - 338128 - - - - 36814 374942<br />

13. Tamil Nadu - - - 16805 - 351210 - 368015<br />

14.<br />

15.<br />

Uttar<br />

Pradesh<br />

West<br />

Bengal<br />

1368960 - - - - - - 1368960<br />

- - 109613 - 331659 - - 441272<br />

Total 2566259 623702 152636 654757 446259 1283881 999974 6727468<br />

data and discussion with the local farmers<br />

a considerable area of soil salinization/<br />

alkalization underlain by poor quality GW was<br />

identified in the Ghaggar flood plain covering<br />

Khusal Majra, Nandgarh, Hansu Majra, Bhatia,<br />

Majri, Kheri Daban and its adjoining villages.<br />

Results revealed that the soils were slight to<br />

moderately sodic and the presence of calcium<br />

carbonate nodules and kankar layer was found<br />

at a depth below the surface horizon (Table<br />

2). The satellite data revealed signatures of<br />

temporary water stagnation as evidenced by the<br />

high water absorption on the satellite imagery in<br />

rabi season. A discussion with the local farmers<br />

revealed that the application of poor quality<br />

(alkali) ground water also reduced infiltration<br />

rate affecting germination and growth of wheat<br />

crop. The CaCO 3<br />

content was higher in Pedon 1<br />

increasing from 4.4 to 9.5 per cent with depth.<br />

High concentration of sodium was observed<br />

in Pedon 5 indicating surface accumulation of<br />

sodium salts in a lower topographic position<br />

with runoff material. The Ca+Mg content was<br />

moderate, ranging from 6.0 to 15.0 in Pedon<br />

5 but low in other pedons. The bicarbonate<br />

contents are low to moderate in all the pedons.<br />

Appreciable amount of chloride at surface to<br />

13.5 cm depth in Pedon 5 showed dominance of<br />

sodium chloride. The other pedons with low to<br />

moderate ECe and pHs are slight to moderately<br />

sodic nature. The CEC values ranged from 16.8<br />

to 21.2 cmol kg -1 in pedon 1, 18.1 to 23.4 in Pedon<br />

2, 15.2 to 17.9 in pedon 4 indicating the presence<br />

of fine textured soils. The OC contents are, in<br />

general, high at surface and low below it. These<br />

22


<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

Database on salt affected soils<br />

Table 2 : Characteristic of selected salt affected soils in Kurukshetra district of Haryana<br />

<strong>Soil</strong><br />

ECe<br />

Ca<br />

Na K<br />

Cl HCO<br />

depth pHs (dS<br />

+Mg<br />

3 CEC<br />

Sand Silt Clay Texture<br />

(cmol<br />

ESP<br />

(%) (%) (%)<br />

(cm)<br />

m -1 ) -----------------me L -1 ------------------ kg -1 )<br />

Pedon 1: Village Landalheri Distrct Kurukshetra 30 o 08’56.3”N 76 o 24’37.2”E<br />

O.C.<br />

(%)<br />

CaCO 3<br />

(%)<br />

0-15 9.4 1.2 13.3 0.1 1.5 5.0 5.0 19.2 47.1 28.1 24.8 53.1 Sil 0.60 4.4<br />

15-30 9.6 1.4 15.7 0.1 1.0 4.0 6.0 16.8 38.5 24.8 36.7 66.7 Sicl 0.20 8.1<br />

30-60 9.7 1.6 18.5 0.1 1.0 4.5 7.0 20.0 38.0 33.3 28.8 69.0 Sicl 0.10 5.2<br />

60-90 9.6 1.7 19.5 0.1 2.5 3.0 6.0 21.2 35.9 39.7 24.5 58.5 Sil 0.20 9.5<br />

Pedon 2: Village Majri Distrct Kurukshetra 29 o 59’35.2”N 76 o 13’41.6”E<br />

0-15 9.1 1.4 10.6 0.08 3.0 8.5 3.3 23.4 50.2 27.0 22.8 40.2 Sil 0.47 2.1<br />

15-30 8.5 4.0 29.8 0.07 4.0 20.0 3.5 21.0 46.0 31.3 22.6 26.6 Sil 0.33 1.6<br />

30-60 8.5 3.1 25.3 0.08 4.0 16.0 3.5 18.1 47.2 32.3 20.5 26.5 Sil 0.07 1.9<br />

60-90 8.5 2.6 22.1 0.05 4.5 14.0 5.3 18.4 51.7 28.2 20.1 22.8 Sil 0.03 2.1<br />

Pedon 3: Village Kamheri Distrct Kurukshetra 30 o 06’58.00”N 76 o 21’57.3”E<br />

0-15 9.0 1.5 14.4 0.0 3.0 4.5 2.5 13.3 53.8 21.7 24.4 51.1 l 0.60 3.0<br />

15-30 9.1 1.9 21.0 0.1 3.0 3.0 3.8 12.3 23.1 29.0 47.8 63.4 sic 0.40 3.0<br />

30-60 9.1 2.6 26.6 0.0 3.0 3.0 4.3 14.4 53.1 19.1 27.8 52.8 cl 0.40 2.3<br />

60-90 9.2 2.5 24.5 0.0 3.0 3.5 3.8 14.4 50.8 18.5 30.7 52.8 cl 0.10 1.4<br />

Pedon 4: Village Tatiana Dist Kurukshetra 30 o 05’04.8”N 76 o 20’34.7”E<br />

0-15 8.2 1.8 20.0 0.1 4.0 5.5 3.5 17.9 45.7 24.5 29.8 40.2 cl 0.60 1.4<br />

15-30 8.5 1.1 <strong>11</strong>.0 0.1 1.5 4.5 1.5 12.3 61.9 17.9 20.1 42.3 l 0.40 1.5<br />

30-60 8.7 1.2 13.2 0.1 4.5 4.5 3.8 19.5 59.2 20.7 20.2 38.9 l 0.30 1.4<br />

60-90 9.0 1.4 15.1 0.1 4.0 5.5 3.5 15.2 59.4 20.5 20.1 52.6 l 0.30 1.2<br />

Pedon 5: Village Baopur Dist Kurukshetra 30o05’43.1”N 76o22’59.3”E<br />

0-30 7.8 5.6 45.6 0.2 9.5 24.5 4.3 14.7 39.5 41.0 31.9 27.0 sicl 0.50 1.5<br />

30-60 7.7 4.4 36.3 0.1 6.0 14.5 3.0 16.3 29.4 32.0 32.8 35.2 sicl 0.40 0.8<br />

60-90 7.5 4.8 37.8 0.1 15.0 13.5 1.5 15.7 35.7 26.1 36.7 37.2 sicl 0.50 0.8<br />

90-120 7.4 3.8 30.5 0.1 12.0 14.5 1.5 19.5 28.7 22.0 35.6 42.4 sic 0.50 0.7<br />

*{cmol (p + ) kg -1 }<br />

soils need proper soil and water management<br />

and application of gypsum for amelioration<br />

before initiating agricultural production. The<br />

area lacked good quality irrigation to flush out<br />

excess salts deposited from the application of<br />

poor quality ground water. Suitable salt tolerant<br />

varieties may also be practiced for sustained<br />

agriculture particularly in the rabi season.<br />

Salt inflictions and seasonal waterlogging<br />

causing land degradation in a part of<br />

Kurukshetra district of Haryana<br />

Mapping Salt Affected, Waterlogged <strong>Soil</strong>s<br />

in Rohtak, Jhajjar and Bhiwani Districts of<br />

Haryana using Remote Sensing and GIS<br />

(Madhurama Sethi , M.L Khurana, S.K. Gupta<br />

and D.S. Bundela)<br />

IRS P-6, LISS III images of 2006 and 2007 (Fig.<br />

2) with a resolution of 23.5 m were used to map<br />

and identify salt affected soils of Jhajjar District,<br />

Haryana. The (SOI) topographic maps on<br />

1:50000 scale were used for geo referencing and<br />

base map preparation. The study area lies<br />

23


Database on salt affected soils <strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

Fig.2 : IRS P6 LISS III image (7 February, 2006) of<br />

Jhajjar district<br />

between 28 ˚ 33’ to 28 ˚ 42’ N and 76˚ 28’ to<br />

76 ˚ 84’ E . GPS assisted ground truth was<br />

conducted to collect soil samples from different<br />

sites (Fig. 3). The area represents alluvial<br />

plain and undulating dunes with an average<br />

elevation of 222 m above mean sea level. The<br />

soil texture varied from sandy to clay with a<br />

variable composition. The soil of Sahlawas and<br />

Mattanhail Blocks pertaining to salinity and<br />

waterlogging affected areas are sandy to sandy<br />

loam in texture.<br />

The pHs ranged from 6.7 to 9.3 and ECe from<br />

0 .69 to 99.4 dS m -1 at 0-15 cm depth (Fig. 4).<br />

The Na, K, Ca+Mg values were transferred to<br />

GIS for further processing. Both salinity and<br />

waterlogging were identified on the images.<br />

Fig.3 : Location of soil samples by GPS of Jhajjar district<br />

Fig. 4 : <strong>Soil</strong> characteristics of Jhajjar district<br />

Spectral signatures of each sample site were<br />

collected and the ISODATA algorithm was<br />

used to cluster the pixels into similar classes. 6<br />

x 6 pixels for each class were isolated based on<br />

spectral signature. Training sites were decided<br />

for different classes with maximum likelihood<br />

algorithm for supervised classification (Fig.5).<br />

degradation.<br />

The salt affected classes of severely salt affected/<br />

barren soil covered 159.53 km 2 . Moderately salt<br />

affected lands supporting agriculture covered<br />

621.58 km 2 . Waterlogged and saline soils cover<br />

Fig.5 : Supervised classification of IRS P6 LISS III<br />

satellite image of Jhajjar district<br />

24


<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

Database on salt affected soils<br />

Table 3 : Land classification of Jhajjar area<br />

Land cover Classes Area (km 2 )<br />

Severely salt affected/barren 159.53<br />

Moderately salt affected 621.58<br />

Waterlogged and saline soils 129.87<br />

Normal cropped 826.23<br />

Sand 74.16<br />

Water bodies 18.09<br />

Total Area 1829 .46<br />

129.87 km 2 (Table 3). The classification produced<br />

an accuracy of 87.25 per cent.<br />

Supervised classification of IRS data showed<br />

accuracy of 87.25 per cent for mapping salt<br />

affected soils in Jhajjar district.<br />

Development of Spectral Reflectance<br />

Methods and Low Cost Sensors for Real-<br />

Time Application of Variable Rate Inputs in<br />

Precision Farming (Madhurama Sethi, D.S.<br />

Bundela, R.K.Yadav)<br />

Three sites were chosen at Village Waiser in<br />

Panipat, Jagsi in Sonepat and Kahni in Rohtak<br />

districts (Fig. 6).<br />

QUICKBIRD imagery and IRS P-6 data were<br />

used for the identification of salt affected areas.<br />

These images were geo-referenced using the SOI<br />

topography supported by the village cadastral<br />

map.<br />

<strong>Soil</strong> samples were collected during kharif from<br />

0-15 cm depth using the YUMA GPS. The<br />

samples were analysed for pH, EC, Na, K,<br />

Ca+Mg. The data were uploaded into the GIS<br />

for mapping and database generation.<br />

The texture of the soils ranged from loam to clay<br />

loam at Waiser village. The pHs ranged from 7.2<br />

to 9.1. The ECe ranged from 0.5 to 7.5 dS m -1 .<br />

The ESP ranged from 1.4 to 31 per cent. The<br />

carbonate is absent and bicarbonate is low.<br />

GPS data were overlaid on the rectified satellite<br />

image. A geo-database was created with all layers<br />

viz; canals, roads, drainage and soil sampling<br />

points. The krigged maps were generated on<br />

areas for different soil parameters at different<br />

depths. The laboratory measured reflectance<br />

spectra of soils indicated that soils are rich in<br />

chloride and sulfate salts than carbonate and<br />

bicarbonate. (Fig. 7)<br />

Krigged maps for different soil parameters<br />

were generated using remote sensing data,<br />

GIS and ground truth<br />

Fig. 6 : Project study sites in Haryana<br />

Fig. 7 : Spectral behaviour of selected salt affected soils<br />

<br />

25


<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

RECLAMATION AND MANAGEMENT OF ALKALI SOILS<br />

Evaluation of Resource Conservation<br />

Technologies in Rice–Wheat Cropping System<br />

(Ranbir Singh , Gurbachan Singh, S.K. Sharma,<br />

P.K. Joshi , P. Dey and S.K. Chaudhari)<br />

Performance of rice-wheat sequence is being<br />

evaluated under various resource conservation<br />

techniques to address some of the problems faced<br />

by the farmers in managing natural resources for<br />

increasing rice-wheat productivity. Experiment<br />

initiated during kharif 2006 was continued. After<br />

rice crop, wheat (cv. PBW-343) was sown in the<br />

second week of November adopting different<br />

crop establishment techniques. The results are<br />

presented in Table 4.<br />

Amongest the treatments tested, highest yield<br />

of wheat (5.58 t ha -1 ) was recorded in reduced<br />

tillage with rice residue incorporation followed<br />

by zero tillage (Sesbania green manuring before<br />

rice). Permanent raised beds yielded 4.38 t ha -1 ,<br />

which was significantly lower as compared to<br />

other crop establishment techniques. Wheat<br />

grain yield was greater in zero tillage with<br />

rice residue retention, as rice residue creates<br />

mulch condition from the seed germination up<br />

to grain formation and might have maintained<br />

favourable hydro-thermal regime. Residual<br />

effects of crop residue incorporation increased<br />

the wheat grain yields by 7.0 per cent over<br />

conventional sowing with crop residue and 6.0<br />

per cent under reduced tillage cultivation with<br />

crop residue incorporation. Sowing of wheat in<br />

zero tillage in rice residue increased the grain<br />

yield by 8.0 per cent in comparison to wheat in<br />

zero tillage without residue. The results revealed<br />

that crop residue either incorporated or retained<br />

increased the grain yield and improved the soil<br />

health.<br />

During kharif season, rice (cv. Ariz 6179) was<br />

cultivated with different crop establishment<br />

techniques (Table 5). Direct seeding of rice<br />

was done on 5 th June, <strong>2010</strong> with a zero tillage<br />

machine, whereas transplanting was done<br />

on 10 th July, <strong>2010</strong>. The maximum yield was<br />

obtained in conventional rice transplanting after<br />

Sesbania green manuring (8.63 t ha -1 ) followed<br />

by conventional transplanting with wheat<br />

residue incorporation (8.28 t ha -1 ). There was<br />

significant difference in yield of puddled and<br />

un-puddled transplanted rice. Direct seeded<br />

rice in standing wheat stubbles gave the yield<br />

of 5.75 t ha -1 , whereas direct seeded rice with<br />

Table 4 : Effect of different crop establishment techniques on grain and straw yield of wheat (2009-10)<br />

Crop establishment techniques<br />

Straw<br />

yield<br />

(t ha -1 )<br />

Grain<br />

yield<br />

(t ha -1 )<br />

Relative<br />

yield<br />

(%)<br />

Conventional sowing without residue 6.48 5.16 100.0<br />

Conventional sowing after rice residue incorporation 6.65 5.48 106.2<br />

Sowing in reduced tillage after direct seeded rice without residue<br />

incorporation<br />

6.28 5.26 101.9<br />

Sowing in reduced tillage after direct seeded rice with residue<br />

incorporation<br />

6.59 5.58 108.1<br />

Sowing in zero tillage without residue 6.17 4.63 89.7<br />

Sowing in zero tillage in rice residue 6.39 4.96 96.1<br />

Sowing on old rice beds 6.03 4.38<br />

Sowing on fresh beds after un-puddle rice 6.35 5.23 99.0<br />

Sowing in zero tillage (Sesbania brown manuring in rice) 6.71 5.35 103.0<br />

Sowing in zero tillage (Sesbania green manuring before rice) 6.85 5.54 105.0<br />

CD (p = 0.05) 0.27 0.31 -<br />

26


<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

Reclamation and management of alkali soils<br />

Wheat crop sown with conventional tillage (left) and reduced tillage (right) without residue<br />

Table 5 : Effect of different crop establishment techniques on yield and water productivity of rice (<strong>2010</strong>)<br />

Crop establishment techniques<br />

Grain<br />

yield a<br />

(t ha -1 )<br />

Water<br />

applied<br />

(m)<br />

Rainfall<br />

(m)<br />

Water<br />

productivity<br />

(Kg m -3 )<br />

Applied<br />

water<br />

saving (%)<br />

Conventional rice transplanting<br />

without residue<br />

Conventional rice transplanting with<br />

residue incorporation<br />

7.91 0.53 0.94 0.54 -<br />

8.28 0.53 0.94 0.57 -<br />

Direct seeded rice without residue 6.48 0.38 1.00 0.47 29.0<br />

Direct seeded rice after wheat residue<br />

incorporation<br />

6.80 0.38 1.00 0.50 29.0<br />

Direct seeded rice in zero tillage 6.15 0.38 1.00 0.45 29.0<br />

Direct seeded rice in zero tillage in<br />

wheat residue<br />

5.75 0.38 1.00 0.42 29.0<br />

Rice transplanting on raised beds 5.58 0.42 0.94 0.45 21.0<br />

Rice transplanting in un-puddle<br />

condition<br />

7.43 0.53 0.94 0.51 -<br />

Direct seeded rice + Sesbania 6.77 0.35 1.00 0.51 34.0<br />

Conventional rice transplanting after<br />

Sesbania green manuring<br />

8.63 0.53 0.94 0.59 -<br />

CD (p = 0.05) 0.33 - - -- --<br />

a<br />

Grain yield at 14% moisture<br />

Sesbania brown manuring yielded 6.77 t ha -1 .<br />

During this season, erratic results were obtained<br />

in direct seeded rice due to relatively high weed<br />

menifestation. Majority of grasses comprised<br />

of Cyprus rotundus (motha), Echinochloa crusgali<br />

(Barta), Echinochloa colonum (Sanmak), makra<br />

etc grew profusely because of high rainfall. The<br />

gross water productivity in different treatments<br />

ranged from 0.42 to 0.59 kg m -3 . The maximum<br />

water productivity was obtained in conventional<br />

rice transplanting after Sesbania green manuring<br />

(0.59 kg m -3 ). Lower water productivity in direct<br />

seeded rice was due to weed infestation during<br />

the crop season. Irrigation was applied when<br />

soil surface became little dry in direct seeded<br />

rice techniques. Maximum water saving of<br />

applied water was recorded in direct seeded<br />

rice + Sesbania (34.0%) followed by direct<br />

27


Reclamation and management of alkali soils <strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

Conventional rice transplanting without residue (left) and with wheat residue incorporation (right)<br />

seeded rice in different treatments (29.0%). The<br />

water saving in raised bed transplanting was<br />

21.0 per cent. After four years of experiment,<br />

positive improvement in soil physico-chemical<br />

and biological properties (soil organic carbon,<br />

available N, available P and saturated hydraulic<br />

conductivity, bulk density, soil dispersion and<br />

available water content) was observed when the<br />

crop was sown with residue incorporation as<br />

compared to without crop residue incorporation.<br />

<strong>Soil</strong> aggregate percentage increased with<br />

organic carbon (Fig. 8). <strong>Soil</strong> aggregation<br />

in different crop establishment techniques<br />

varied from 5.20 to 40.52 per cent. Maximum<br />

soil aggregates (40.52%) were recorded in<br />

conventional rice transplanting after Sesbania<br />

green manuring followed by direct seeded rice<br />

Wheat sowing in zero and reduced tillage with<br />

crop residue seems to be a promising option for<br />

sustained wheat yield. Wheat yield increased<br />

with residue incorporation or retention in zero<br />

tillage technique. Direct seeded rice saved<br />

29.0 to 34.0 per cent applied water in different<br />

treatments with marginal reduction in yield as<br />

compared to conventional transplanting<br />

after wheat residue incorporation (32.08%) and<br />

minimum soil aggregates (5.2%) were recorded<br />

in conventional rice transplanting without<br />

residue.<br />

Efficient Use of Organic Waste Material as<br />

Mulching in Maize-Wheat Cropping System<br />

in Reclaimed Sodic <strong>Soil</strong>s (H.S. Jat, Ranbir Singh<br />

and Gurbachan Singh)<br />

Performance of maize-wheat system is being<br />

evaluated under conservation tillage practices.<br />

Experiment initiated during kharif 2009 was<br />

continued during kharif <strong>2010</strong>. The results<br />

indicated that the planting methods did not have<br />

any effect on grain and straw yield of wheat and<br />

maize crops (Table 6). Overall productivity of<br />

maize-wheat system was more or less similar<br />

(8.18 and 8.07 t ha -1 ) under flat and bed planting<br />

techniques.<br />

Fig. 8 : Effect of resource conservation techniques (RCT)<br />

on soil aggregates and organic carbon content in<br />

0-15 cm soil layer<br />

Application of organic waste as mulching<br />

materials influenced the yield of both crops. The<br />

data indicated that the grain yield of wheat was<br />

28


<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

Reclamation and management of alkali soils<br />

Table 6 : Effect of planting and organic waste mulching on yield of wheat and maize crops<br />

Treatments<br />

significantly higher when mulching was done<br />

with Jatropha (4.48 t ha -1 ) over no mulching (4.05<br />

t ha -1 ). Rest of the treatment had no significant<br />

effect on grain yield of wheat. The same trend<br />

was observed with straw yield of wheat. In<br />

the case of maize, mulching with Sesbania (4.12<br />

t ha -1 ), Brassica (4.18 t ha -1 ) and Jatropha (4.05<br />

t ha -1 ) produced significantly higher grain<br />

yield over no mulching. The higher water<br />

Wheat yield (t ha -1 ) Maize yield (t ha -1 )<br />

Grain Straw Grain Straw<br />

Flat planting 4.33 5.77 3.85 5.29<br />

Bed planting 4.14 5.32 3.93 5.50<br />

SEm ± 0.68 1.50 0.81 1.49<br />

CD (P=0.05) NS NS NS NS<br />

T 1<br />

- No mulching 4.05 5.20 3.47 4.98<br />

T 2<br />

- Sesbania rostrata 4.46 5.81 4.12 5.39<br />

T 3<br />

- Brassica juncea 4.26 5.64 4.18 5.35<br />

T 4<br />

- Prosopis juliflora 4.01 5.20 3.71 5.43<br />

T 5<br />

- Jatropha curcas 4.48 5.84 4.05 5.78<br />

T 6<br />

– Leuceana leucocephala 4.14 5.58 3.80 5.44<br />

SEm ± 0.14 0.20 0.14 0.25<br />

CD (p=0.05) 0.41 0.61 0.41 0.76<br />

Table 7 : Influence of planting methods and mulching on irrigation water productivity and saving in maizewheat<br />

cropping system<br />

Treatments<br />

Irrigation water productivity (kg m -3 )<br />

Maize Wheat Maize-wheat<br />

Irrigation<br />

water saving<br />

(%)<br />

Flat planting 1.91 0.97 1.26 -<br />

Bed planting 2.60 1.22 1.64 24.<strong>11</strong><br />

SEm ± 0.08 0.05 0.08<br />

CD (p=0.05) 0.24 0.15 0.24<br />

T 1<br />

- No mulching 1.93 1.01 1.30 -<br />

T 2<br />

- Sesbania rostrata 2.37 1.16 1.53 3.62<br />

T 3<br />

- Brassica juncea 2.38 1.10 1.50 3.10<br />

T 4<br />

- Prosopis juliflora 2.09 1.02 1.36 1.90<br />

T 5<br />

- Jatropha curcas 2.29 1.13 1.49 1.38<br />

T 6<br />

- Leuceana leucocephala 2.16 1.05 1.39 1.90<br />

SEm ± 0.06 0.05 0.07<br />

CD (p=0.05) 0.18 0.15 0.21<br />

productivity (Table 7) of maize and wheat was<br />

recorded in bed planting (2.60 and 1.22 kg m -3 ) as<br />

compared to flat planting (1.91 and 0.97 kg m -3 ).<br />

In maize-wheat cropping system, higher water<br />

productivity was observed with bed planting<br />

(1.64 kg m -3 ) over flat planting (1.26 kg m -3 ).<br />

Application of mulching registered higher water<br />

productivity than without mulching treatments<br />

in maize-wheat cropping system. Bed planting<br />

29


Reclamation and management of alkali soils <strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

Flat planting of maize crop Bed planting of maize crop Bed planting of Wheat crop<br />

Fig. 9: <strong>Soil</strong> Moisture as influenced by planting methods<br />

and mulching<br />

method in maize-wheat cropping system saved<br />

24.<strong>11</strong> per cent irrigation water over flat planting<br />

but there was a negligible (1.38 to 3.62%) saving<br />

of water with various mulching treatments.<br />

<strong>Soil</strong> moisture in 0-15 cm depth at harvest was<br />

significantly higher under flat planting (12.65%)<br />

over bed planting (10.45 %). But the reverse trend<br />

was observed in 15-30 cm depth (Fig.9). Under<br />

different mulching treatments, application of<br />

Brassica mulching registered the higher soil<br />

moisture (12.80%) over no mulching at 0-15 cm<br />

depth. At 15-30 cm depth, Brassica mulching<br />

registered 14.75 per cent soil moisture and at<br />

par with Jatropha and Sesbania. However, at 30-<br />

60 cm depth, Brassica mulching recorded the<br />

higher soil moisture (14.90%) over no mulching<br />

(13.50%).<br />

Sesbania, Brassica and Jatropha proved to be very<br />

good mulching materials for higher productivity<br />

of maize-wheat sequence. Bed planting saved 24<br />

per cent irrigation water over flat planting.<br />

Diagnosis, Definition and Interventions for<br />

Salt-Affected <strong>Soil</strong>s of Indo-Gangetic Plains in<br />

Participatory Appraisal (R.K. Yadav, Khajanchi<br />

Lal, Neeraj Kulshrestha, Sharad Kumar Singh<br />

and Satyendra Kumar)<br />

The field experiments were initiated on<br />

farmers’ fields in Ghaggar plains of Punjab<br />

and Haryana during 2008 where the problem<br />

of poor grain filling in rice and wheat crops<br />

was reported. The experiments were continued<br />

during the report period. Morpho-physicochemical<br />

characteristics of soils of the site<br />

showed that soil is silty clay, moderately<br />

sodic, deep to very deep, poorly drained and<br />

cracking with low AWC. Groundwater used<br />

for irrigation has RSC ranging from 3.5 to 6.0<br />

me L -1 . Some prospective physical, chemical<br />

and agronomic strategies are being evaluated<br />

in an integrated manner. Laser leveling and<br />

chiseling at 3 m distance comprised physical<br />

interventions. Application of recommended<br />

dose of NPK (chemical) for respective crops;<br />

recommended dose of NPK (chemical) + 100%<br />

GR; recommended dose of NPK (chemical) +<br />

groundwater RSC neutralization; 50% NPK<br />

(chemical) + 50% through rice straw + 50% GR<br />

and 50% NPK (chemical) + 50% through FYM<br />

+ 50% GR comprised the chemical measures.<br />

Agronomic strategies included cultivation of<br />

paddy in puddle condition, zero till DSR, DSR in<br />

tilled field at optimum moisture and broadcast<br />

sowing of pre-germinated seed in dry tilled<br />

irrigated conditions, while wheat was sown as<br />

conventional, zero till, broadcast in prepared<br />

seed bed and broadcast at last irrigation in<br />

paddy.<br />

30


<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

Reclamation and management of alkali soils<br />

<strong>Soil</strong> chiseling recorded higher in yields of<br />

wheatand rice by 10-15 and 4-7 per cent,<br />

respectively. During the last year, respective<br />

yield increase was 13-18 and 10-<strong>11</strong> per cent.<br />

Laser land leveling enhanced the wheat yield<br />

by 22 per cent and rice by 8-<strong>11</strong> per cent (Table 8)<br />

besides 15-18 per cent irrigation water saving in<br />

wheat this year. Passing of groundwater through<br />

gypsum beds for RSC neutralization to 2.0<br />

Table 8 : Effect of different physical, chemical and agronomic interventions on grain yield of wheat and<br />

rice<br />

Treatments<br />

Wheat yield (t ha -1 ) Rice yield (t ha -1 )<br />

PBW 550 PBW 502 DBW 17 CSR 30 PAU 201<br />

Chiseling (10.2 ha) 4.17 4.07 3.99 1.99 5.<strong>11</strong><br />

Without chiseling 3.53 3.61 3.40 1.85 4.91<br />

% increase 15 <strong>11</strong> 10 7 4<br />

Laser level (1.2 ha) 4.43 4.28 4.17 2.06 5.33<br />

Without leveling 3.42 3.31 3.34 1.91 4.77<br />

% increase 23 23 20 8 <strong>11</strong><br />

Gypsum bed use (16.8 ha) 4.52 4.33 -- 2.51 5.37<br />

Without gypsum bed 3.48 3.30 -- 2.18 4.93<br />

% increase 32 30 -- 13 8<br />

Farmers’ practice 3.43 3.28 3.<strong>11</strong> 1.97 4.65<br />

100% NPK Zn 3.97 3.76 4.02 2.09 5.20<br />

100% NPK Zn + 100% GR 4.63 4.43 4.34 2.62 5.59<br />

50%NPK+50% rice straw + 100 GR 4.21 3.82 3.86 2.01 4.87<br />

50%NPK+50% FYM + 100 GR 4.38 3.98 4.05 2.31 5.05<br />

CD (p=0.05) 0.26 0.22 0.18 0.17 0.21<br />

Table 9 : Effect of agronomic interventions on grain yield of rice and wheat<br />

Rice<br />

Wheat<br />

Rice grain yield (t ha -1 ) Wheat grain yield (t ha -1 )<br />

CSR<br />

30<br />

PAU<br />

201<br />

CSR<br />

30*<br />

PBW<br />

550<br />

PBW<br />

502<br />

DBW<br />

17<br />

PBW<br />

550*<br />

Puddled transplant Conventional 2.30 4.90 2.85 4.13 4.13 4.24 4.88<br />

Puddled transplant Broadcast in paddy 2.08 4.47 3.02 3.85 3.79 3.65 3.71<br />

Puddled transplant Zero till sowing 2.23 5.30 2.71 3.97 4.08 3.97 4.43<br />

Puddled transplant<br />

Unpuddled<br />

transplant<br />

DSR at optimum<br />

moisture<br />

BC pre-germination<br />

+ dhaincha<br />

Puddled<br />

transplant<br />

Broadcast in cult/irrg<br />

field<br />

2.<strong>11</strong> 5.15 2.88 3.90 3.75 3.79 4.05<br />

Broadcast in paddy 2.03 4.63 2.77 3.78 3.58 3.69 3.42<br />

Zero till sowing 1.40 3.67 2.24 3.75 3.83 3.80 4.30<br />

Zero till sowing 1.43 -- 1.58 3.83 -- 3.89 4.56<br />

Turboseeding in<br />

combine harvested<br />

paddy<br />

2.12 4.87 -- 4.21 4.26 4.18 --<br />

Zero till DSR Zero till sowing 1.45 3.82 1.5.9 3.86 3.76 3.94 4.42<br />

CD (p=0.05) 0.32 0.38 0.45 0.32 0.28 0.31 0.43<br />

The values with * are the yields recorded in controlled conditions in experiment at <strong>CSSRI</strong>, Karnal ; BC-Broadcasting<br />

31


Reclamation and management of alkali soils <strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

me L -1 before applying to crops had significant<br />

impact on wheat yields only.<br />

On an average, different interventions produced<br />

32 and <strong>11</strong> per cent higher grain yields of<br />

wheat and rice, respectively. Among chemical<br />

interventions, though all proved better in<br />

comparison to farmers’ practice but application of<br />

recommended (soil test basis) dose of NPK + Zn<br />

in chemical form with addition of 100 % Gypsum<br />

Requirement (GR) was found to be the best. This<br />

treatment significantly increased the grain yields<br />

of both the crops over all other treatments. It was<br />

followed by 50%NPK +50% FYM + 100% GR<br />

and 50%NPK +50% FYM + 100% GR. As far as<br />

agronomic interventions are concerned (Table<br />

9), rice yield recorded in puddle and unpuddled<br />

transplant were at par but superior over DSR<br />

(direct seeded rice) in tilled plots at optimum<br />

moisture and zero till DSR.<br />

The grain yield of wheat obtained under<br />

conventional cultivation, turboseeding in<br />

combine harvested, zero till conditions after<br />

puddle or unpuddle transplant was at par,<br />

but better than zero till sowing with seedcum-fertilizer<br />

drill under combine harvested<br />

conditions, broadcast sowing at last irrigation<br />

and broadcast sowing in cultivated and irrigated<br />

conditions. There was a net saving of water<br />

equivalent to 3 irrigations each of 3.0 cm depth<br />

in the case of DSR and unpuddle transplant in<br />

comparison to puddle transplant rice. Deeper<br />

(4-7 cm) and wider (3-5 cm) cracks in puddle<br />

fields in comparison to 2-5 cm deep and 1.5-3<br />

cm wide in unpuddle transplant, and only 1-2<br />

cm deep and < 1 cm wide in DSR were recorded<br />

at the harvest of paddy.<br />

Effect of Different Land Use System on<br />

Carbon Sequestration, <strong>Soil</strong> Physico-Chemical<br />

Properties and Capacity of these <strong>Soil</strong>s for<br />

Sustaining Crop Growth under Salt Affected<br />

<strong>Soil</strong> (P. Dey, H.S. Jat, Anil R. Chinchmalatpure<br />

and D. Burman)<br />

Yield plateau in rice-wheat system along with<br />

diminishing factor productivity is a serious<br />

problem engulfing agriculture. Identification of<br />

efficient and sustainable land use system has,<br />

therefore, assumed greater significance under<br />

these circumstances. <strong>Soil</strong> organic carbon (SOC)<br />

is an index of soil fertility and crop productivity.<br />

To determine SOC, horizon-wise soil samples<br />

from profiles were collected and compared for<br />

reclaimed sodic soil of Karnal, Haryana with<br />

that of sodic vertisol of Bharuch, Gujarat. The<br />

results showed that SOC decreases more rapidly<br />

with depth in reclaimed sodic soil than that of<br />

sodic Vertisols (Fig. 10). Since pedoturbation is<br />

a common phenomenon in sodic Vertisols, the<br />

SOC in the profile get uniformly distributed.<br />

Thus, SOC was found to be more evenly<br />

distributed in sodic Vertisols of Western part of<br />

India than that of reclaimed sodic soils of North-<br />

West Indian conditions.<br />

A pot culture experiment was conducted to study<br />

the nutrient supplying potential of soils under<br />

different land use systems with rice as a test<br />

crop. It was observed that soils are, in general,<br />

deficient in nitrogen and phosphorus and plants<br />

exhibit deficiency symptoms. Amongst different<br />

land use systems, aonla-based system was found<br />

to produce higher grain yield/pot.<br />

<strong>Soil</strong> organic matter sustainability under different<br />

systems was also estimated for the sodic Vertisols<br />

under three different land uses comprising of<br />

agriculture, woody perennials and pasture-based<br />

systems (Fig. <strong>11</strong>). Pasture-based and woody<br />

perennial based systems recorded higher value<br />

of soil organic matter sustainability than the<br />

agriculture-based systems in sodic Vertisols.<br />

The study of weed dynamics (Table 10) revealed<br />

that weed dry weight was lowest in rice-wheat<br />

system (0.33 t ha -1 ). Among different land use<br />

systems, highest weed dry weight was recorded<br />

in Casuarina (1.33 t ha -1 ), followed by Prosopisbased<br />

(1.31 t ha -1 ) and Eucalyptus-based (1.24 t<br />

ha -1 ) systems. Higher weed dynamics in original<br />

sodic land was due to less competition with any<br />

crop/trees since it is kept fallow. In general,<br />

the systems having comparatively higher<br />

canopy coverage promote more annual weeds<br />

as compared to perennials whereas, the system<br />

having lesser canopy cover promote more<br />

pernnial than annual weeds.<br />

32


<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

Reclamation and management of alkali soils<br />

Fig. 10 : Changes in soil organic carbon in reclaimed sodic soil (A) profile of Vertisol (B)<br />

Fig. <strong>11</strong> : <strong>Soil</strong> organic matter stability under different land<br />

use systems<br />

Table 10 : Weed dynamics and biomass production<br />

during kharif in different land use<br />

systems<br />

Land use<br />

systems<br />

No. of<br />

weeds m -2<br />

Fresh wt.<br />

of weeds<br />

(t ha -1 )<br />

Dry wt.<br />

of weeds<br />

(t ha -1 )<br />

Guava based 10.58 3.08 1.19<br />

Aonla based 10.41 3.66 1.15<br />

Casurina based 8 3.89 1.33<br />

Prosopis based 9.12 4.35 1.31<br />

Eucalyptus<br />

based<br />

7.85 2.80 1.24<br />

Rice-wheat 4.31 1.19 0.33<br />

Soybean-wheat 6.89 1.80 0.57<br />

Original land 10.25 5.27 2.07<br />

Integrated Nutrient Supply and Management<br />

System for Sustainable Crop Production<br />

in Alkali <strong>Soil</strong>s (N.P.S.Yaduvanshi and<br />

S.K.Chaudhari)<br />

A long-term field experiment initiated in 1994<br />

to evaluate the use of chemical fertilizers and<br />

organic manure on a gypsum amended alkali<br />

soil (pH 8.7 and ESP 18) was continued. The<br />

treatments consisted of T 1<br />

- Control (without<br />

organic and inorganic fertilizer), T 2<br />

- N 180<br />

P 22<br />

K 0<br />

Zn 5<br />

, T 3<br />

-N 180<br />

P 39<br />

K 63<br />

Zn 5<br />

, T 4<br />

-N 100<br />

P 16<br />

K 28<br />

+ moong,<br />

T 5<br />

- N 100<br />

P 16<br />

K 28<br />

+ GM before rice transplanting,<br />

T 6<br />

-N 100<br />

P 16<br />

K 28<br />

+ FYM before rice transplanting,<br />

T 7<br />

- N 100<br />

P 16<br />

K 28<br />

+ wheat straw before rice<br />

transplanting, T 8<br />

-N 100<br />

P 16<br />

K 28<br />

+ rice straw<br />

before wheat sowing, T 9<br />

-N 150<br />

P 26<br />

K 42<br />

S 30<br />

Zn 7<br />

Mn 7<br />

, T 10<br />

- N 150<br />

P 26<br />

K 42<br />

S 30<br />

Zn 7<br />

Mn 0<br />

. The experiment<br />

was conducted in randomized block design<br />

with four replications. The farm yard manure<br />

(FYM) and wheat residue were incorporated<br />

at 15 and 30 days before transplantating of<br />

rice, respectively. The green manure crop of<br />

dhaincha and moong as pulse crop were sown<br />

in-situ during May. A 50 days old sesbania crop<br />

was harvested, weighed and incorporated into<br />

the soil by power tiller. The moong crop was<br />

incorporated after two pickings. Rice cv Pusa-<br />

44 (30 days old seedlings) was transplanted<br />

in standing water in the first week of July<br />

using 2 seedlings/hill at a spacing of 20 cm x<br />

15 cm. One third of N and full doses of P and<br />

K, S, Zn and Mn were applied at the time of<br />

transplanting as per treatment. The remaining<br />

nitrogen was broadcasted in two equal splits<br />

at 3 and 6 weeks after transplanting. The crops<br />

were grown under irrigated condition.<br />

Results showed that the application of N 100<br />

P 16<br />

K 28<br />

+ green manuring or moong or FYM, N 150<br />

P 26<br />

K 42<br />

Zn 7<br />

S 30<br />

Mn 7<br />

and N 150<br />

P 26<br />

K 42<br />

Zn 7<br />

S 30<br />

Mn 0<br />

were<br />

significantly superior in comparison to farmers’<br />

practice (N 180<br />

P 22<br />

K 0<br />

Zn 5<br />

) (Table <strong>11</strong>). The highest<br />

yield was obtained with the application of N 150<br />

P 26<br />

K 42<br />

Zn 7<br />

S 30<br />

Mn 7<br />

. There was no response to K<br />

and Mn application.<br />

33


Reclamation and management of alkali soils <strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

Table <strong>11</strong> : Effect of different integrated nutrient<br />

management treatments on yield of rice<br />

and wheat<br />

Treatments<br />

Grain yield (t ha -1 )<br />

Wheat<br />

2009-10<br />

Rice <strong>2010</strong><br />

N 0<br />

P 0<br />

K 0<br />

1.96 2.26<br />

N 180<br />

P 22<br />

K0Zn 5<br />

(FP) 4.33 5.49<br />

N 180<br />

P 39<br />

K 63<br />

Zn 5<br />

4.68 5.72<br />

N 100<br />

P 16<br />

K 28<br />

+ Moong 4.72<br />

5.89 + 1.2<br />

(Moong)<br />

N 100<br />

P 16<br />

K 28<br />

+ GM 4.40 6.18<br />

N 100<br />

P 16<br />

K 28<br />

+ FYM 4.03 5.87<br />

N 100<br />

P 16<br />

K 28<br />

+ WS 4.06 5.59<br />

N 100<br />

P 16<br />

K 28<br />

+ RS 4.24 5.62<br />

N 150<br />

P 26<br />

K 42<br />

S 30<br />

Zn 7<br />

Mn 7<br />

4.51 6.35<br />

N 150<br />

P 26<br />

K 42<br />

S 30<br />

Zn 7<br />

Mn 0<br />

4.28 6.02<br />

CD (P= 0.05) 0.33 0.38<br />

FP - Farmers’ practice<br />

<strong>Soil</strong> physico-chemical properties under INM<br />

treatments<br />

Data on the effect of INM treatments on soil<br />

bulk density, hydraulic conductivity and water<br />

retention are presented in Table 12. Various<br />

INM treatments did not influence soil bulk<br />

density, saturated hydraulic conductivity and<br />

water retention at 33 kPa and 1500 kPa soilwater<br />

suction significantly after rice harvesting<br />

during <strong>2010</strong>. Three seasons’ average values<br />

revealed that the incorporation of green manure<br />

or application of FYM lowered the soil bulk<br />

density and increased the saturated hydraulic<br />

conductivity as compared with the mineral<br />

fertilizer application, though the change was<br />

statistically non-significant. Incorporation of<br />

rice and wheat straw were not equally effective<br />

as that of green manure and FYM in changing<br />

the soil bulk density and saturated hydraulic<br />

conductivity. In general, saturated hydraulic<br />

conductivity values of the bottom layer were<br />

lower than the upper layer, mainly due to<br />

depth-wise increase in the bulk density and the<br />

clay content. Incorporation of green manure<br />

and application of FYM brought considerable<br />

improvement in water retention at 33 kPa soilwater<br />

suction, which was statistically superior<br />

over mineral fertilizer application after wheat<br />

and rice <strong>2010</strong>. However, the incorporation of<br />

green manure or application of FYM slightly<br />

increased the water retention at 1500 kPa soilwater<br />

suction as compared with the mineral<br />

fertilizer application, though the change was<br />

statistically non-significant. Addition of organic<br />

sources increased soil organic carbon, available<br />

N, P, K and micronutrients (Zn, Fe, Mn and Cu)<br />

and decreased soil pH. Combining chemical and<br />

organic sources with judicious fertilizer use is<br />

the most effective strategy for maintaining soil<br />

productivity and sustaining crop yields.<br />

Maximizing rice yield through early stage<br />

nursery transplanting in partially puddled<br />

conditions<br />

The experiment was initiated with the objectives<br />

to maximize rice yield by early stage nursery<br />

transplanting with recommended practices<br />

during <strong>2010</strong>. The treatments consisted of. T 1<br />

-<br />

Recommended practice (30 days nursery), T 2<br />

-<br />

15 days nursery (without sesbania), T 3<br />

- 15 days<br />

nursery (0 day sesbania) and, T 4<br />

- 15 days nursery<br />

(7 days sesbania). Rice variety Pusa-44 nursery<br />

was sown as per treatments. Rice (30 days old<br />

seedlings) was transplanted in standing water<br />

in first week of July using 2 seedlings/hill at a<br />

spacing of 20 cm x 15 cm. The fertilizer applied<br />

at the time of transplanting as per treatments.<br />

The remaining nitrogen was broadcasted as<br />

per treatments. Transplanting of 15 days old<br />

nursery significantly increased the rice yield as<br />

compared to recommended age. Transplanting<br />

of 15 days nursery with sesbania at 0 and 7<br />

days significantly decreased the rice yield as<br />

compared to transplanting of 15 days nursery<br />

without sesbania. Transplanting of 15 days old<br />

nursery with sesbania at 7 days slightly increased<br />

the rice yield in comparison to 0 day of sesbania<br />

(Table 13).<br />

34


<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

Reclamation and management of alkali soils<br />

Table 12 : Effect of INM treatments on soil physical properties<br />

INM treatments<br />

<strong>Soil</strong> depth<br />

(cm)<br />

Bulk density<br />

(mg m -3 )<br />

Saturated<br />

hydraulic<br />

conductivity<br />

(mm h -1 )<br />

Water<br />

retention(θ v<br />

)<br />

(cm 3 cm -3 ) at<br />

33 kPa<br />

Water<br />

retention(θ v<br />

)<br />

(cm 3 cm -3 ) at<br />

1500 kPa<br />

N 0<br />

P 0<br />

K 0<br />

15-30 1.42 1.5 0.24 0.14<br />

0-15 1.42 1.7 0.23 0.16<br />

30-60 1.43 -- 0.23 0.15<br />

N 180<br />

P 22<br />

K 0<br />

Zn 5<br />

(FP)<br />

0-15 1.42 1.7 0.23 0.15<br />

15-30 1.42 1.8 0.25 0.14<br />

30-60 1.42 -- 0.24 0.16<br />

N 180<br />

P 39<br />

K 63<br />

Zn 5<br />

15-30 1.42 1.4 0.23 0.15<br />

0-15 1.41 1.7 0.22 0.15<br />

30-60 1.43 -- 0.21 0.15<br />

N 100<br />

P 16<br />

K 28<br />

+ moong<br />

0-15 1.40 1.9 0.28 0.16<br />

15-30 1.40 1.9 0.25 0.16<br />

30-60 1.40 -- 0.25 0.15<br />

0-15 1.38 2.3 0.34 0.17<br />

N 100<br />

P 16<br />

K 28<br />

+ GM<br />

15-30 1.39 2.2 0.32 0.16<br />

30-60 1.39 -- 0.33 0.15<br />

N 100<br />

P 16<br />

K 28<br />

+ FYM<br />

0-15 1.38 2.5 0.36 0.18<br />

15-30 1.38 2.4 0.36 0.17<br />

30-60 1.39 -- 0.34 0.16<br />

N 100<br />

P 16<br />

K 28<br />

+ WS<br />

0-15 1.40 2.0 0.27 0.15<br />

15-30 1.41 1.7 0.27 0.15<br />

30-60 1.42 -- 0.27 0.15<br />

N 100<br />

P 16<br />

K 28<br />

+ RS<br />

0-15 1.42 1.9 0.24 0.16<br />

15-30 1.43 1.9 0.24 0.15<br />

30-60 1.42 -- 0.23 0.15<br />

N 150<br />

P 26<br />

K 42<br />

S 30<br />

Zn 7<br />

Mn 7 15-30 1.41 1.4 0.22 0.15<br />

0-15 1.41 1.5 0.23 0.15<br />

30-60 1.42 -- 0.23 0.14<br />

N 150<br />

P 26<br />

K 42<br />

S 30<br />

Zn 7<br />

Mn 0<br />

15-30 1.41 1.3 0.23 0.15<br />

0-15 1.39 1.3 0.24 0.15<br />

30-60 1.41 -- 0.23 0.15<br />

CD(0.05) Treat. NS NS 0.<strong>11</strong> NS<br />

Depth NS NS NS NS<br />

35


Reclamation and management of alkali soils <strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

Table 13 : Effect of different treatments on yield of<br />

rice<br />

Treatments Rice yield (t ha -1 )<br />

T 1<br />

- Recommended practices<br />

(30 days nursery)<br />

T 2<br />

- 15 days nursery (without<br />

sesbania)<br />

T 3<br />

- 15 days nursery (0 day<br />

sesbania)<br />

T 4<br />

- 15 days nursery (7 days<br />

sesbania)<br />

5.05<br />

5.57<br />

4.28<br />

4.54<br />

CD (p= 0.05) 0.33<br />

Productive Utilization of Inland Sodic/Saline<br />

<strong>Soil</strong> and Water for Aquaculture in relation to<br />

Farming System <strong>Research</strong> (S.K Singh)<br />

The productivity of fish biomass based on<br />

supplementary feed (down size farm grain@1-5%<br />

of body weight of fish) from the new pond (0.1 ha)<br />

and an old pond (0.4 ha) was 2.98 and 3.86 t ha -1<br />

after one year of cultivation at 800±250 g mean<br />

weight of the species. After eighteen months of<br />

culture, the production from ponds was found<br />

to be 3.10 and 4.20 t ha -1 year -1 , respectively.<br />

The species recovery from the ponds after<br />

harvest were found in the order of Cyprinus<br />

carpio (Common carp) > Ctenopharyngodon idella<br />

(Grass carp) >Catla catla (Catla) > Labeo rohita<br />

(Rohu) > Cirrhinus mrigal (Mrigal). The major<br />

phsico-chemical and hydrobiological parameter<br />

of pond soil and water is given in the Table 14<br />

and 15. On the bund of the new pond, elephant<br />

foot yam (Zimikand) (Amorphallus paeonifolius)<br />

was grown to the level of 3-5 times of initial<br />

plantation under farming system practices in<br />

sodic soil condition along with fish culture<br />

activity in the pond. From both the ponds, the<br />

revenue of ` 83,973 was generated through<br />

Table 15 : Physico-chemical and biological<br />

parameters of the pond water<br />

Parameters New pond Old pond<br />

Pond water area (ha) 0.1 0.4<br />

Mean water depth (m) 0.90<br />

(0.75-1.25)<br />

1.2<br />

(0.85-1.60)<br />

Water transparency (cm) 10.0-18.6 6.8-24.0<br />

Water temperature ( 0 C) 10-38 10-38<br />

Water pH 7.2-9.1 7.0-9.3<br />

D.O.(mg L -1 ) 1.0-6.2 2.8-8.3<br />

Free CO 2<br />

(mg L -1 ) 0.0-20.0 0.0-16.0<br />

Alkalinity (mg L -1 ) 196-260 128-160<br />

Hardness (mg L -1 ) <strong>11</strong>0-160 88-120<br />

DOM (mg L -1 ) 2.0-4.4 3.6-6.2<br />

EC (dS m -1 ) 0.50-0.92 0.30-0.78<br />

Planktonic productivity<br />

(ml/100 L water)<br />

0.5-1.5 0.25-1.75<br />

Bottom biota (No m -2 ) Nil 0-01<br />

Fish production after<br />

18 month (t ha -1 year -1 )<br />

3.10 4.20<br />

B:C 2.70 5.60<br />

DO - Dissolved oxygen; DOM - Dissolved organic matter<br />

fish sale. The B:C for the new pond was 2.7 for<br />

fish and 2.88 (0.2ha) for vegetable cultivation,<br />

whereas overall B:C for old fish pond was 5.6.<br />

The fresh stocking of ponds with different type<br />

of carp fish fingerling (5-15g size) i.e.Catla catla<br />

(Catla), Labeo rohita (Rohu), Cirrhinus mrigala<br />

(Mrigal), Hypopthalmicthys molitrex (Silver carp),<br />

Ctenopharyngodon idella (Grass carp), Cyprinus<br />

carpio(Common carp) at the rate of 10,000 ha -1<br />

was done December, <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

Table 14 : <strong>Soil</strong> characteristics of fish ponds<br />

<strong>Soil</strong> characteristics<br />

Plot of the new<br />

pond<br />

Bottom of the<br />

new pond<br />

Marginal area of dyke<br />

of old pond<br />

Bottom of the<br />

old pond<br />

pH 8.1-9.37 7.77-7.91 7.0-8.1 7.0-7.66<br />

EC e<br />

(dS m -1 ) 0.20-0.44 0.45-0.64 0.28-0.89 0.30-0.69<br />

Organic carbon (%) 0.13-0.48 0.42-0.48 0.03-0.56 0.56-0.83<br />

36


<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

Reclamation and management of alkali soils<br />

Studies on Multi-enterprise Agriculture<br />

on Reclaimed Sodic Land for Sustaining<br />

Livelihood (Gurbachan Singh, J.C. Dagar, H.S.<br />

Jat, R.S. Tripathi, N.P.S. Yaduvanshi, Lalita<br />

Batra, P.C. Sharma, R.S. Pandey, S.K. Chaudhari,<br />

S.K. Singh, S.S. Kundu and N.S. Sirohi)<br />

A multienterprise agriculture project was<br />

initiated on 2.0 ha reclaimed alkali land at<br />

the experimental farm of <strong>CSSRI</strong>, Karnal with<br />

interdisciplinary approach to develop farming<br />

options/capsules. The project was initiated in<br />

2006 with a broad idea of sustainable use of<br />

natural resources.<br />

Multienterprise components<br />

Multienterprise agriculture model is an<br />

integration of various components grouped<br />

in two categories i.e. crop components and<br />

subsidiary components. Crop components gave<br />

the income on half yearly basis while subsidiary<br />

components generate the income on regular<br />

basis. Total revenue of ` 3,54,828 was generated<br />

in the multienterprise model after expending `<br />

1,02,357 (Table 16) resulting in a net income of<br />

` 2,52, 471. Crop components generated a net<br />

annual income of ` 1,07, 388 and subsidiary<br />

components ` 1,45,083. Subsidiary components<br />

generated a daily net income of ` 397 with an<br />

expenditure of ` 201.<br />

Crop components<br />

The profitability of different crops under crop<br />

components was worked out on the basis of<br />

minimum support price of marketable produce<br />

for the year 2009-10 (Table 17). Horticulture<br />

and fodder-based systems were found to be<br />

more remunerative than other crop production<br />

systems. In horticulture production system,<br />

the highest net income of ` 1,10,316 ha -1 was<br />

recorded with a B:C of 5.35 followed by vegetable<br />

production system (` 80,683 ha -1 ). However, the<br />

lowest return was recorded with floriculture<br />

production system (` 37,202 ha -1 ) with a B:C<br />

ratio of 1.83.<br />

In case of grain production, the highest system<br />

productivity in terms of rice equivalent yield<br />

(9.74 t ha -1 ) was recorded by rice-wheat and<br />

maize-wheat-moong cropping systems with a<br />

B:C of 3.87 and 3.15, respectively. However, the<br />

highest net income (` 74,596 ha -1 ) was observed<br />

with rice-wheat cropping system (Table 18).<br />

The lowest rice equivalent yield (6.24 t ha -1 )<br />

was observed with soybean-maize cropping<br />

system with a net return of ` 43,565 ha -1 . Under<br />

grain production components, rice-wheat and<br />

maize-wheat-moong cropping systems were<br />

compatible with each other and profitable in<br />

comparison to other cropping systems.<br />

Subsidiary components<br />

Milk production unit could be considered as<br />

‘core unit’ of multienterprise, which gave regular<br />

income (` 10216 month -1 ) and employment to<br />

the farmer’s family. Average monthly milk<br />

productions from animals are presented in<br />

Fig 12. The variation in milk production was<br />

governed by the lactation period of the animals.<br />

In the month of December, highest milk (790 L)<br />

was produced, whereas lowest milk production<br />

(33 L) was recorded in the month of July <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

A good volume of milk (414 L month -1 ) was<br />

recorded throughout the year. The highest net<br />

income (` 2,54,871 2ha -1 ) was recorded with<br />

multienterprise agriculture model with a B:C<br />

ratio of 2.47 closely followed by horticulture<br />

based production system (` 2,20,633 2ha -1 ) with<br />

a B:C of 5.35. Horticulture based system in<br />

which the vegetable crops were grown with the<br />

fruit plants of guava proved to be economic and<br />

highly beneficial to the farmers.<br />

Fig 12 : Monthly trend s of milk production (L m -1 )<br />

during the year (<strong>2010</strong> )<br />

37


Reclamation and management of alkali soils <strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

Table 16 : Revenue generation, expenditure and net income in multienterprise agriculture model<br />

Multi-enterprise components<br />

Revenue<br />

generation (`)<br />

Expenditure<br />

(`)<br />

Net<br />

income (`)<br />

B:C<br />

ratio<br />

Crop Components<br />

Fodder production - 0.4 ha 21712 3585 18127 5.06<br />

Grain production- 0.8 ha 56775 13155 43621 3.32<br />

Floriculture production-0.2 ha <strong>11</strong>5<strong>11</strong> 4071 7440 1.83<br />

Horticulture based-0.2 ha 26190 4126 22063 5.35<br />

Vegetable production- 0.2 ha 20020 3883 16137 4.16<br />

Sub-total 136208 (373) 28820 (79) 107388 (294) 3.73<br />

Subsidiary Components<br />

Milk + compost + biogas 135271 38127 97144 2.55<br />

Fruits & vegetables on pond dykes 23476 2400 21076 8.78<br />

Fish 27527 1500 26027 17.35<br />

Poultry & ducks 29326 30<strong>11</strong>0 -784 -<br />

Mushroom 1500 1200 300 0.25<br />

Bee-keeping 1520 200 1320 6.90<br />

Sub total 218620 (599) 73537 (201) 145083 (397) 1.97<br />

Total 354828 (972) 102357 (280) 252471 (692) 2.47<br />

Note : Figures in parenthesis indicate per day income<br />

Table 17 : Economics of different crop components grown<br />

Crop Components<br />

Gross income<br />

(` ha -1 )<br />

Operational cost<br />

(` ha -1 )<br />

Net income<br />

(` ha -1 )<br />

Fodder production 54280.00 8962.00 45318.00<br />

Grain production 70969.25 16443.50 54525.75<br />

Floriculture production 57556.92 20354.50 37202.42<br />

Horticulture based 130947.50 20631.00 <strong>11</strong>0316.50<br />

Vegetable production 100100.00 19416.90 80683.10<br />

Horticulture + vegetable system<br />

Wheat crop<br />

38


<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

Reclamation and management of alkali soils<br />

Table 18 : Productivity and profitability of different cropping systems in multi-enterprise agriculture<br />

Cropping systems<br />

Productivity<br />

(t ha -1 )<br />

Operational<br />

cost<br />

(` ha -1 )<br />

Gross<br />

income<br />

(` ha -1 )<br />

Net<br />

income<br />

(` ha -1 )<br />

B:C<br />

ratio<br />

Rice<br />

equivalent<br />

yield (t ha -1 )<br />

Rice-wheat 9.32 19274 93870 74596 3.87 9.74<br />

Rice 5.22 9806 49590 39784 4.06 5.22<br />

Wheat 4.10 9468 44280 34812 3.68 4.52<br />

Moong-maizewheat<br />

9.28 23014 95490 72476 3.15 9.74<br />

Moong 0.40 3769 <strong>11</strong>040 7271 3.51 1.13<br />

Maize 4.75 8845 39900 31055 3.51 4.07<br />

wheat 4.13 10400 44550 34150 3.28 4.55<br />

Soybean-maize 6.28 17602 6<strong>11</strong>67 43565 2.48 6.24<br />

Soybean 1.53 8203 21267 13064 1.59 2.17<br />

Maize 4.75 9400 39900 30500 3.24 4.07<br />

Pigeonpea-maize 1.45+37.5* 13749 70850 57101 4.22 7.23<br />

Maize (fodder) 37.50 7864 37500 29636 3.77 3.83<br />

Pigeonpea 1.45 5885 33350 27465 4.67 3.40<br />

*Fodder yield<br />

Recycling of FYM within the system<br />

About 43.46 t of cow dung was obtained from 5-6<br />

animals during the study period. Out of which,<br />

15.93 t was used for generating biogas, 26.89 t<br />

for composting, 0.13 t for vermi-composting and<br />

0.52 t was added to the fish pond as fish feed.<br />

The dung used in biogas plant, after production<br />

of biogas, was also added into the compost pits.<br />

A major part of urine of animals was added<br />

directly into the fish pond.<br />

<strong>Soil</strong> biological quality<br />

After 3 years of cropping, greater microbial<br />

biomass carbon microbial nitrogen flush<br />

and dehydrogenase activity was observed<br />

under sorghum-berseem (268.6, 19.6 and 59.9,<br />

respectively) cropping system as compared<br />

to all other systems (Table 19). However, acid<br />

phosphatase activity was higher (184.5) in ricewheat<br />

cropping system. This indicates that the<br />

fodder production component is highly efficient<br />

in providing suitable micro climate to microorganisms.<br />

The lowest microbial nitrogen (16.5<br />

mg kg -1 ) and dehydrogenase activity (21.2 µg<br />

TPF g -1 soil) was observed under floriculture<br />

production system.<br />

Fish production and water quality of pond<br />

The ongoing experimental trial for rearing<br />

of different type of fish fingerlings viz;Catla<br />

catla (Catla), Labeo rohita (Rohu), Cirrhinus<br />

mrigala (Mrigal), Ctenopharyngodon idella (Grass<br />

carp), Cyprinus carpio (Common carp) was<br />

undertaken in this pond model (0.2 ha). Post<br />

stocking management of the pond in relation to<br />

multienterprise agriculture was done for natural<br />

productivity in terms of pond fertilization<br />

mainly with duck droppings and cow dung<br />

generated in the model. The fresh stocking of<br />

pond with different type of carp fish fingerling<br />

(10-15g size) @ 10,000 ha -1 was done during the<br />

period under report. The fish productivity after<br />

39


Reclamation and management of alkali soils <strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

Table 19 : Microbial properties under different production systems of crop components<br />

Cropping systems<br />

Microbial<br />

biomass<br />

carbon<br />

(mg kg -1 )<br />

Microbial<br />

nitrogen<br />

flush<br />

(mg kg -1 )<br />

Dehydrogenase<br />

activity<br />

(µg TPF g -1 soil)<br />

Acid<br />

phosphatase<br />

activity<br />

(µg PNP g -1<br />

soil)<br />

Grain production (Rice-Wheat) 255.6 ± 40.6 18.5 ± 3.2 24.6 + 3.2 184.5 + 12.5<br />

Fodder production (Sorghumberseem)<br />

Horticulture production (Guava+<br />

Banana + tomato + Bhindi)<br />

Vegetable production (Bottle guard -<br />

Cauliflower)<br />

Floriculture production (Baby corn -<br />

marigold - gladiolus)<br />

268.6 ± 23.5 19.6 ± 3.6 59.9 + 6.0 91.3 + 7.7<br />

180.2 ± 15.6 18.9 ± 2.2 21.9 + 2.4 121.6 + 16.2<br />

179.5 ± 25.2 17.6 ± 3.9 24.6 + 3.5 105.7 + 15.4<br />

194.8 ± 19.1 16.5 ± 1.9 21.2 + 2.6 134.4 + 9.2<br />

one year cultivation, at the level 750± 250g mean<br />

weight of the overall species from the pond, was<br />

3.5 t ha -1 and finally after eighteen months at the<br />

level of 3.58 t ha -1 year -1 . The species recovery<br />

from the ponds after harvest were found in the<br />

order of Cyprinus carpio > Ctenopharyngodon idella<br />

> Catla catla > Labeo rohita > Cirrhinus mrigal. The<br />

major physico-chemical and hydrobiological<br />

parameters of pond soil and water are given in<br />

Table 20 and 21.<br />

Table 20 : <strong>Soil</strong> parameters of multienterprise pond<br />

Marginal area Bottom area<br />

Parameters<br />

of pond of pond<br />

<strong>Soil</strong> pH 7.92-9.74 7.54-7.79<br />

EC (dS m -1 ) 0.28-1.05 0.48-0.94<br />

Organic<br />

carbon (%)<br />

0.10-0.50 0.35-1.53<br />

Multienterprise model generates employment<br />

for the farmers’ family and provide regular<br />

income of ` 397 day -1 from the subsidiary<br />

components in addition to seasonal income<br />

from crop components.<br />

Table 21 : Physico-chemical and biological<br />

parameters of water<br />

Parameters<br />

Values<br />

Pond water area (ha) 0.2<br />

Mean water depth (m) 1.25 (0.9-1.5)<br />

Water transparency (cm) 8.0-16.0<br />

Water temperature ( 0 C) 10-38<br />

Water pH 7.0-9.0<br />

D.O.(mg L -l ) 1.5-7.2<br />

Free CO 2<br />

(mg L -l ) 0.0-12.0<br />

Alkalinity (mg L -l ) 210-280<br />

Hardness (mg L -l ) 130-200<br />

DOM (mg L -l ) 4.0-8.0<br />

EC(dS m -1 ) 0.63-0.82<br />

Planktonic productivity<br />

(ml100 -l water)<br />

0.5-2.0<br />

Bottom biota (No m -2 ) 01<br />

Fish production after eighteen<br />

month (t ha -1 year -1 )<br />

3.58<br />

B:C 5.8<br />

<br />

40


<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

MANAGEMENT OF WATER LOGGING/SALINE SOILS<br />

Guidance in Identification of Problem Areas<br />

and Design and Evaluation of Subsurface<br />

Drainage Projects in Haryana (S.K. Gupta, Anil R.<br />

Chinchmalatpure, R.S. Tripathi and R.L. Meena)<br />

Pump-cum-gravity outlet<br />

For minimizing the cost of pumping, gravitycum-pumped<br />

outlets have been provided at<br />

few places wherever technically feasible. A<br />

desk study revealed that under the prevailing<br />

water-table conditions in the Beri area as much<br />

as 75 per cent of the cost of pumping could be<br />

saved with this provision (Table 22). In fact,<br />

with such a system, there would be no need to<br />

pump for water and salt balance purposes as the<br />

requirement could be fully met with the gravity<br />

flow. Pumping for irrigation purpose would only<br />

be needed for which farmers have no hesitation<br />

in investing on pump and operational cost.<br />

Modelling water-table, salinization and<br />

desalinization<br />

Wasim model was used to assess the post<br />

drainage situation of the water-table under wet<br />

(25% above normal rainfall), normal and dry<br />

rainfall (25% below normal rainfalls) years. Two<br />

years data for each case were used assuming<br />

that 2 years of above normal rainfall would be<br />

followed by 2 years of normal (485 mm) and 2<br />

years of below normal rainfall. The predictions<br />

shown in Fig. 13 revealed that at no time water<br />

table reaches 30 cm below the ground level with<br />

drainage provision. Since, the total rainfall and<br />

rainfall storms determine the rise of the watertable,<br />

water-table in normal and above normal<br />

rainfall for this particular case were not very<br />

different. However, the water-table during dry<br />

years remained lower than normal or above<br />

Table 22 : Variation of discharge through orifice at different heads and volume drained by gravity and<br />

pumping<br />

Months Water<br />

table<br />

depth<br />

(Av.<br />

2004-07)<br />

(cm)<br />

Depth<br />

of<br />

orifice<br />

(cm)<br />

Height<br />

above<br />

orifice<br />

(cm)<br />

Diameter<br />

of orifice<br />

(cm)<br />

Discharge<br />

through<br />

orifice<br />

(L s -1 )<br />

Discharge<br />

through<br />

pumping<br />

(L s -1 )<br />

Volume<br />

drained by<br />

pump per<br />

day (m 3<br />

day -1 ) (8h<br />

day -1 )<br />

Volume<br />

drained<br />

by orifice<br />

(m 3 day -1 )<br />

(24h day -1 )<br />

Jan 50.0 65.0 15.0 7.2 4.3 10.0 288.0 367.9<br />

Feb 55.0 65.0 10.0 7.2 3.5 10.0 288.0 300.4<br />

Mar 50.0 65.0 15.0 7.2 4.3 10.0 288.0 367.9<br />

Apr 65.0 65.0 0.0 7.2 0.0 10.0 288.0 0.0<br />

May 73.0 65.0 0.0 7.2 0.0 10.0 288.0 0.0<br />

Jun 80.0 65.0 0.0 7.2 0.0 10.0 288.0 0.0<br />

Jul 63.0 65.0 2.0 7.2 1.6 10.0 288.0 134.4<br />

Aug 54.0 65.0 <strong>11</strong>.0 7.2 3.6 10.0 288.0 101.6 *<br />

Sep 41.0 65.0 24.0 7.2 5.4 10.0 288.0 155.1 *<br />

Oct 36.0 65.0 29.0 7.2 5.9 10.0 288.0 165.0 *<br />

Nov 37.0 65.0 28.0 7.2 5.8 10.0 288.0 502.7<br />

Dec 38.0 65.0 27.0 7.2 5.7 10.0 288.0 493.6<br />

Total 642.0 780.0 161.0 86.4 40.0 120.0 3456.0 2588.8<br />

Average 53.5 65.0 13.4 7.2 3.3 10.0 288.0 215.7<br />

*submerged orifice for 20 days<br />

41


Management of water logging/saline soils <strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

pre-sowing irrigation on short-term basis.<br />

However, over the long-term, above normal<br />

rainfall would take care of salinity build-up.<br />

Fig. 13 : Groundwater table behaviour in wet, normal<br />

and dry years under drainage<br />

normal rainfall years. It appears that under the<br />

drainage situation, chances of aeration problem<br />

are quite less.<br />

Although, the provision of drainage helps in<br />

reclaiming the land but reuse of drainage effluent<br />

for crop production during the rabi season may<br />

cause soil salinization. On the other hand,<br />

desalinization would occur during the monsoon<br />

season. To see the variation in soil salinity under<br />

this situation, a case study was prepared for the<br />

wheat crop wherein saline water (5 dS m -1 ) was<br />

used to apply 4 irrigations following pre-sowing<br />

irrigation with fresh water. The soil salinity at<br />

the time of wheat harvest reached at a level of 2.5<br />

dS m -1 (EC 2<br />

), which is not detrimental to wheat<br />

crop at this stage. The soil salinity remained at<br />

that level and decreased with on-set of monsoon<br />

season (Fig. 14). Several combinations of such<br />

exercises revealed that :<br />

There is no build-up of soil salinity on a longterm<br />

basis<br />

<strong>Salinity</strong> build-up on year-to-year basis may<br />

occur depending upon the amount of rainfall.<br />

This may be taken care of by applying a heavy<br />

Fig.14 : <strong>Soil</strong> salinization and desalinization in saline<br />

water irrigated land with subsurface drainage<br />

From these studies, it could be concluded that<br />

drainage helped in controlling the water- table<br />

and facilitated the reuse of drainage water.<br />

Besides, it is also concluded that Wasim Model<br />

could be used in monitoring and evaluation<br />

of various management options that could<br />

be applied to manage drained lands to get<br />

maximum advantage of land drainage with<br />

minimum cost.<br />

Farmers’ Participatory Action <strong>Research</strong><br />

Programme (FPARP) on Enhancing<br />

Groundwater Recharge and Water Productivity<br />

(S.K. Kamra, Satyendra Kumar, R.K. Yadav,<br />

Sharad K. Singh, Pragati Maity, Ram Ajore,<br />

Gurbachan Singh)<br />

The sustainability of agriculture in northwestern<br />

states is threatened due to alarming<br />

decline of water-table, increase in pumping cost<br />

and deterioration in groundwater quality. The<br />

groundwater decline can be deferred to some<br />

extent by enhancing artificial recharge using<br />

rain and excess canal water through surface<br />

spreading and well injection techniques. It helps<br />

in utilizing flood water that otherwise goes<br />

waste or causes damage to standing crops and<br />

also in improving groundwater quality. Well<br />

injection techniques are getting accepted due to<br />

failure or delay in arrival of natural or artificially<br />

recharged water to deeper aquifer zones with<br />

surface methods.<br />

Farmers’ Participatory Action <strong>Research</strong><br />

Programme (FPARP) on Enhancing<br />

Groundwater Recharge and Water Productivity<br />

was continued at <strong>CSSRI</strong>, Karnal and Regional<br />

<strong>Research</strong> Stations, Bharuch and Lucknow<br />

during <strong>2010</strong>. During this period, innovative<br />

groundwater recharge, pond renovation,<br />

integrated farming systems, laser leveling<br />

technologies and irrigation interventions have<br />

been implemented at 93 village sites in Haryana,<br />

Punjab, Uttar Pradesh and Gujarat. These<br />

include injection well type recharge structures<br />

installed and evaluated at 52 farmers’ fields (32<br />

42


<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

Management of water logging/saline soils<br />

in Haryana, 5 in Punjab, 3 in Uttar Pradesh and<br />

12 in Gujarat). These are based on well injection<br />

technique and involve passing of excess rain<br />

and canal water under gravity through a bore<br />

well to subsurface sandy zones coupled to a<br />

recharge filter consisting of layers of coarse<br />

sand, small gravel and boulders in a small brick<br />

masonry chamber. Design features of recharge<br />

structures installed in Haryana and Punjab have<br />

been discussed in earlier reports, broad feature<br />

and cost of main technologies/interventions for<br />

whole project are summarized in Table 23.<br />

Individual farmers can construct recharge<br />

structures at any low lying location where<br />

runoff gets accumulated and adversely affects<br />

the production of rice during monsoon rains<br />

and of wheat during occasional winter rains.<br />

The temporal changes in depth, EC and RSC<br />

of groundwater at two representative sites in<br />

Haryana are presented in Fig. 15. It is seen that<br />

recharge events, indicated by arrows, cause both<br />

a rise in water-table depth and reduction in EC<br />

and sometimes also of RSC of groundwater.<br />

The capital investment cost has been worked<br />

out @ ` 3.5 to Rs. 2.1 m -3 recharge water for<br />

locations collecting runoff from 12- 20 ha area.<br />

The recharge structures, with intake rate of 4-6<br />

litre sec -1 , have proven highly effective in these<br />

states in augmenting groundwater, improving<br />

Table 23 : Features of recharge structures and<br />

interventions<br />

Structure<br />

Depth<br />

(m)<br />

Thickness<br />

of sandy<br />

layers (m)<br />

Cost<br />

(`)<br />

Recharge shaft 30- 46 10- 18<br />

35000-<br />

48000<br />

Recharge cavity 40- 55 NA<br />

35000-<br />

45000<br />

Recharge cavitycum<br />

- strainer well<br />

50 25 55000-<br />

58000<br />

Recharge well 25- 45 15- 18<br />

Laser leveling and<br />

improved irrigation<br />

methods<br />

Pond renovation - -<br />

22000-<br />

31000<br />

- - 4000-<br />

5000/ha<br />

10000-<br />

20000<br />

Fig. 15 : Temporal changes in depth, EC and RSC of<br />

groundwater at two recharge sites (Dera<br />

Yatriwala and Dera Gujran) in Haryana<br />

its quality (salinity, alkalinity and fluoride<br />

concentration) and enhancing farmers’ income<br />

by saving submerged crops by recharge of<br />

excess water. The recharging of water resulted<br />

in 0.6- 3.3 m and 0.3 to 3.3 m rise in water table<br />

at different sites in Haryana and Punjab during<br />

rainy seasons of 2009 and <strong>2010</strong>, respectively.<br />

The corresponding reduction in salinity and<br />

RSC of groundwater at different sites ranged<br />

from 0.2-2.4 and 0.1- 0.8 dS m -1 and 0-6.6 and<br />

0-8.3, respectively during these two years.<br />

The payback period of 30- 45 m deep recharge<br />

structures, costing ` 30,000- 50,000, has been<br />

estimated to be 1-2 years only. Similarly,<br />

recharge through recharge wells in alluvial and<br />

rocky regions of Bharuch district of Gujarat<br />

resulted in prolonged availability and reduction<br />

in groundwater salinity and consequent, 15 to 40<br />

per cent increase in income from fruit (banana,<br />

papaya and mango) plantations. Further,<br />

recharge of excess canal water through recharge<br />

cavities at 3 sites in Unnao district of UP reduced<br />

fluoride concentration of groundwater from 2.0<br />

ppm to 1.2 ppm, i.e below prescribed limit of 1.5<br />

ppm for drinking water.<br />

Field and lab studies are in progress to devise<br />

improved designs of recharge filters, including<br />

radial and biological filters to minimize clogging<br />

problem. Thickness of upper sand layer of<br />

43


Management of water logging/saline soils <strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

Groundwater recharge structures recharging excess rainwater and saving submerged crops at two sites in Haryana<br />

recharge filter has been found to be a primary<br />

factor influencing clogging, while size of gravel<br />

in the middle layer also controls effectiveness of<br />

sand as a filter.<br />

Laser levelling was implemented at 25 sites<br />

in Haryana, Punjab and Uttar Pradesh.<br />

Comparative studies on the depth and uniformity<br />

of water application and crop yields in one acre<br />

conventionally leveled and laser leveled fields at<br />

selected sites in Haryana indicated that the laser<br />

leveling is an effective technology that can save<br />

upto 20 per cent irrigation water requirement<br />

and increase yield and water productivity of<br />

both rice and wheat by about 10 and 35 per cent,<br />

respectively resulting in an annual increase of<br />

income by ` 10,910 (Table 24).<br />

Table 24 : Increase in water productivity in laser<br />

leveled over conventionally leveled<br />

fields (Av. of 6 demonstrations in<br />

farmers’ fields in Karnal district)<br />

Parameter Rice Wheat<br />

Saving in irrigation water (%) 18.6 21.1<br />

Increase in yield (%) 8.3 <strong>11</strong>.0<br />

Per cent increase in water<br />

productivity (kg m -3 of applied 34.6 37.6<br />

water)<br />

Per cent increase in water<br />

productivity (` m -3 of applied 4.7 5.9<br />

water)<br />

Increase in income (` ha -1 ) 5,040 5,870<br />

Total ` 10,910<br />

Saline aquaculture demonstration studies were<br />

also conducted in 0.2 ha size pond at one site<br />

(Jagsi, Distt Sonipat). The results indicated good<br />

scope of fish species like Catla, Rahu, Mrigal,<br />

grasscarp and commoncarp in waterlogged<br />

saline ground water using water of 2.5 dS m -1<br />

salinity. With in a period of eight months, the<br />

size of above fishes increased from 5 g to 400-<br />

600 g. Erosion of pond dyke due to heavy rain<br />

was observed to be a constraint for aquaculture<br />

in waterlogged saline areas.<br />

Integrated Filtering System for Artificial<br />

Groundwater Recharge (Satyendra Kumar, S.K.<br />

Kamra and R.K. Yadav)<br />

A study is in progress to design a efficient<br />

filtering system for groundwater recharge<br />

structures. The specific aim of this research was<br />

to determine the filtration efficiency of coarse<br />

grained filter media used in artificial recharge<br />

structure, and to evaluate the effects of their use<br />

on the quantity and quality of water recharged.<br />

A circular PVC column (22.5 cm dia and 120<br />

cm height) was fabricated for the laboratory<br />

experiment with inflow and outflow fittings.<br />

PVC pipes of 1.25 cm diameter, perforated<br />

half portion i.e. in half circle were fixed at<br />

different intervals in the column to sample<br />

the flowingwater from different depths of<br />

filtering medium for studying the movement of<br />

sediments within the medium (Fig. 16). At the<br />

bottom of the column, two concentric collectors<br />

were provided for passing the filtrate from<br />

filtering medium, while filtrate moved along<br />

with sides of the column collected by the outer<br />

collector and that water was not considered for<br />

44


<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

Management of water logging/saline soils<br />

Fig. 16: PVC column used in the laboratory study<br />

further analysis. Gravel, boulder and coarse<br />

sand (CS) was used as filtering medium. Since,<br />

finer particles i.e. CS is encountered first, it is<br />

responsible for retaining the physical impurities<br />

carried with runoff water. Therefore, different<br />

particle size of CS with varying thickness of<br />

filtering medium were prepared and evaluated.<br />

Three particle sizes of CS viz;(T 1<br />

) 0.35-0.51,<br />

(T 2<br />

) 0.5-0.7, (T 3<br />

) 0.7-1.0 mm were used in<br />

this experiment. The gradation curve for the<br />

materials used in laboratory study is presented<br />

in Fig. 17. In T 3<br />

, about 90 per cent of CS particles<br />

were more than 0.5 mm in diameter, while it<br />

was about 80 per cent in T 2<br />

. In filtering medium<br />

T 1<br />

, 20 per cent CS particles were 0.35 mm or less<br />

in diameter.<br />

The varying sediment concentrations ranging<br />

from 250 to 3000 mg L -1 were prepared by<br />

Fig. 17 : Gradation curve for material used as filtering<br />

medium and base material (soil)<br />

collecting the surface soil from the farmer’s field<br />

where recharge structure had been installed.<br />

<strong>Soil</strong>s were dried, sieved (0.2 mm) and used as<br />

the suspended sediment material for testing<br />

of vertical filter. Further, the sieved particles<br />

were weighted and the designed levels of<br />

concentration were prepared. Tap water was<br />

passed through filtering medium for 10 minutes<br />

before conducting the test run with different<br />

sediment concentration of water, so that filtering<br />

medium is clean. The laboratory study revealed<br />

that performance of filter depends upon particle<br />

size of coarse sand (CS) and influent sediment<br />

load. It was observed that removal efficiency<br />

(RE) of the medium increased with the thickness<br />

of CS bed and decreasing sediment load of<br />

influent. Similar trend was found with all three<br />

CS medium. CS medium T 1<br />

recorded 80 per cent<br />

RE for all the sediment loads except 3000 ppm<br />

at 10 cm out let. It indicates that about 80 per<br />

cent suspended load of influent was retained by<br />

top 10 cm CS bed and retention reached to more<br />

than 90 per cent after traveling 15 cm within<br />

the medium. However, removal efficiency was<br />

fewer with CS medium T 2<br />

and T 3<br />

. The same RE<br />

was recorded with 40 and 50 cm depth of CS in<br />

T 2<br />

and T 3<br />

, respectively. Lab study also indicated<br />

that filtration rate gradually decreased with the<br />

increase in suspended solids of influent water<br />

(Fig 18). Although, declining rate was sharp in<br />

the medium of greater particle size (T 3<br />

), but,<br />

the rate was recorded substantially higher than<br />

the others. It indicates that clogging was slow<br />

in the coarse medium. Hence, if CS medium<br />

of greater particle size (0.7-1.0 mm) is used in<br />

filtering unit that can work satisfactorily for the<br />

longer period compared to the others. The slope<br />

of the line (Fig. 19) decreased with decreasing<br />

sediment load. It shows that filtering media<br />

performed better with lower concentration of<br />

influent. It can be concluded that performance<br />

of vertical filtering medium can be improved<br />

either by using coarser particles of sand with<br />

greater thickness or by providing sedimentation<br />

facility before the CS bed to reduce the sediment<br />

load to a possible low level.<br />

45


Management of water logging/saline soils <strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

Fig. 18: Effect of Thickness of sand bed on removal efficiency for different particle size of filtering media<br />

Fig.19 : Effect of particle size of coarse sand (CS) and sediment load on filtration rate<br />

Performance Study of Subsurface Microirrigation<br />

for Horticultural Crops (fruits) using<br />

Domestic Wastewater (R.S. Pandey, Lalita<br />

Batra, S.K. Gupta and Ali Qadar)<br />

The research work on use of sewage water<br />

with drip irrigation for fruit crops, initiated in<br />

2006, was continued. The study was carried out<br />

with two treatments i.e. drip irrigation with<br />

(i) sewage water and (ii) good quality water.<br />

Three fruit crops are being cultivated i.e. aonla<br />

and guava as main fruit crops with inter crop<br />

papaya. The pressure compensating drippers<br />

were installed at 40 cm depth having discharge<br />

rate of 4 L h -1 and four emitters were provided<br />

for each guava and aonla plant. During the<br />

year, the study was conducted on three basic<br />

aspects. i.e. back pressure, clogging of emitters<br />

and plant performance. In the back pressure<br />

study, the emphasis was given on the effect of<br />

backpressure on emitter performance and their<br />

selection criteria. During backpressure, there<br />

is a reduction in net pressure due to pressure<br />

generated by the soil media. The manufacturing<br />

coefficients of variation of the emitters, which<br />

was non-pressure compensating and utilized<br />

during vegetable production during 2003-06,<br />

were analyzed for this purpose (Table 25). Data<br />

revealed that these emitters are better suited for<br />

the backpressure as manufacturing coefficient<br />

of variation increased with the applied pressure.<br />

Here, the nominal discharge rate pressure was<br />

1.0 kg cm - ² and manufacturing coefficient of<br />

variation was less at 0.60 kg cm - ² pressure having<br />

value of 0.0514 compared to higher pressure i.e.<br />

1.5 kg cm - ², having the value of 0.0928 above the<br />

nominal discharge rate pressure.<br />

In fruit crops, plant spacing is wide, which<br />

require clubbing of the emitters to increase the<br />

discharge rate. In the present case, the plant-to-<br />

46


<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

Management of water logging/saline soils<br />

Guava plant of 4 years age along with inter fruit tree<br />

papaya<br />

Table 25 : Change in manufacturing coefficient<br />

of variation of drippers with applied<br />

pressure and discharge rate in laterals<br />

Pressure in<br />

lateral pipe<br />

(kg cm ‐ ²)<br />

Mean<br />

discharge<br />

rate of<br />

emitters<br />

(L h -1 )<br />

Manufacturing<br />

coefficient of<br />

variation<br />

0.60 3.44 0.0514<br />

1.00 3.87 0.0827<br />

1.50 4.86 0.0928<br />

2.00 6.04 0.1038<br />

Aonla plant of 4 years age along with inter fruit tree<br />

papaya<br />

plant spacing of the guava and aonla was 4.5 m<br />

and row to row spacing was 6.0 m. In the case of<br />

Papaya, plant-to-plant and row-to-row spacing<br />

was 1.5 m. Data on the grouping of the amitters<br />

on discharge uniformity under surface and subsurface<br />

drip are presented in Table 26 and 27.<br />

It appears that there was decrease in coefficient<br />

of variation while clubbing higher number<br />

of emitters thus increasing the uniformity<br />

coefficient under both surface and subsurface<br />

drip irrigation systems. In the plant performance<br />

study, the plant height, shaded area, girth<br />

and yield of aonla and guava were monitored<br />

and analyzed. There was large variability in<br />

Table 26 : Effect of grouping of the emitters on uniformity of discharge rate in surface drip irrigation<br />

No. of<br />

emitters<br />

clubbed<br />

Average<br />

discharge rate of<br />

the emitters<br />

(L h -1 )<br />

Manufacturing<br />

coefficient of<br />

variation<br />

Average<br />

discharge rate<br />

of emitters after<br />

3 years use<br />

(L h -1 )<br />

Coefficient of<br />

variation of<br />

emitters after 3<br />

years use<br />

Uniformity<br />

coefficient<br />

(%)<br />

1 3.87 0.077 3.89 0.330 68.0<br />

2 7.74 0.052 7.78 0.197 80.0<br />

3 <strong>11</strong>.61 0.047 <strong>11</strong>.67 0.159 84.0<br />

Table 27 : Effect of grouping of the emitters on uniformity of discharge rate in subsurface drip irrigation<br />

No. of<br />

emitters<br />

clubbed<br />

Average discharge<br />

rate of the emitters<br />

(L h -1 )<br />

Manufacturing<br />

coefficient of<br />

variation<br />

Average<br />

discharge rate<br />

of the emitters<br />

after 3 years use<br />

(L h -1 )<br />

Coefficient of<br />

variation of<br />

emitters after 3<br />

years use<br />

Uniformity<br />

coefficient<br />

(%)<br />

1 3.85 0.078 3.78 0.170 83.00<br />

2 7.70 0.052 7.56 0.<strong>11</strong>4 88.60<br />

3 <strong>11</strong>.55 0.047 <strong>11</strong>.34 0.128 87.40<br />

47


Management of water logging/saline soils <strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

shaded area affecting planning of the amount of<br />

irrigation, which needs consideration.<br />

Decision Support System for Enhancing<br />

Productivity in Irrigated Saline Environment<br />

using Remote Sensing, Modelling and GIS<br />

(D.S. Bundela, S.K. Gupta, Madhurama Sethi,<br />

R.L. Meena, N.P.S. Yaduvanshi and R.S.<br />

Tripathi)<br />

An irri-agro informatics database of the<br />

Western Yamuna Canal (WYC) command<br />

was updated for new distributaries and water<br />

courses. Canal information extracted from<br />

recent remote sensing inputs and supply data.<br />

The geo-database was used for identification<br />

and delineation of the area of low productivity<br />

in the WYC command using GIS methodology<br />

based on canal supplies, groundwater quality,<br />

salt affected soils and satellite derived<br />

vegetation index (NDVI), salinity index (NDSI)<br />

and waterlogging index (NSWI) (Fig. 20). It<br />

was found that the area affected with low<br />

productivity is 988 sq km (7.24% of the command)<br />

(Fig. 21). For intensive study, low productivity<br />

areas were selected in the command of the<br />

Butana branch (Fig. 22a). The crop production<br />

constraints in irrigated saline environment were<br />

identified and the suitable best management<br />

practices (BMPs) were suggested for enhancing<br />

wheat yield in the mid and tail reaches of the<br />

Butana distributary. Poor irrigation practices<br />

and inadequate conjunctive use of multi quality<br />

waters were the main constraints resulting in<br />

low crop yield as well as low to moderate soil<br />

salinity built-up. Twelve field demonstrations<br />

Fig.20 : Methodology for identification of area of low<br />

productivity<br />

Fig.21 : Area of low productivity in the WYC Command<br />

(a)<br />

(b)<br />

Fig. 22 a & b: Area of low productivity and location of 12<br />

field demonstrations in Butana distributary.<br />

(Fig. 22 b and Table 28 and 29) were conducted at<br />

farmers’ fields in Sonipat and Rohtak districts to<br />

induce confidence in farmers for quick adoption<br />

of developed practices for growing good crop<br />

in low productivity area. The results would be<br />

reported after the wheat harvest.<br />

A system architecture of DSS (decision support<br />

system) for the WYC command was developed<br />

using Microsoft Visual C#.NET for integrating<br />

modules, developed database, ETo calculator,<br />

CropWat, Aquacrop, GIS and spatial query<br />

interface (Fig. 23). It comprises seven modules<br />

namely, crop water demand, canal demandsupply,<br />

groundwater, irrigation scheduling,<br />

48


<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

Management of water logging/saline soils<br />

Table 28 : Field demonstrations with initial soil status at the time of sowing<br />

Location<br />

<strong>Soil</strong> quality<br />

Field<br />

Distributary<br />

Water<br />

course<br />

Village (District)<br />

Farmer<br />

Depth pH s<br />

ECe SAR<br />

1. Mid reach Mid reach<br />

Butana Khetlan<br />

(Sonipat)<br />

Kapoor<br />

Singh<br />

0-15 7.7-8.0 3.6-17.0 6.5-30.4<br />

15-30 7.7-8.0 4.5-13.7 7.2-29.3<br />

2. Mid Mid<br />

Butana Kundu<br />

(Sonipat)<br />

Amit<br />

Singh<br />

0-15 7.8-8.2 2.0-3.2 6.0-7.6<br />

15-30 8.0-8.5 0.81-3.4 5.1-9.5<br />

3. Mid Tail<br />

Butana Kundu<br />

(Sonipat)<br />

Rajbir<br />

Singh<br />

0-15 7.9-8.1 1.7-3.3 6.1-7.7<br />

15-30 8.0-8.4 0.8-2.9 5.1-9.2<br />

4. Mid Tail<br />

Butana Khetlan<br />

(Sonipat)<br />

Anand<br />

Kumar<br />

0-15 8.1-8.2 0.5-1.2 1.7-3.3<br />

15-30 8.0-8.3 0.3-1.4 1.2-3.7<br />

5. Mid Tail<br />

Butana Khetlan<br />

(Sonipat)<br />

Jagat<br />

Singh<br />

0-15 8.0-8.2 2.2-4.05 2.5-4.0<br />

15-30 7.8-8.1 1.8-4.7 2.7-4.1<br />

6. Mid Tail<br />

Khanpur Khurd<br />

(Sonipat)<br />

Ramphal<br />

0-15 8.4-8.5 0.4-0.5 1.2-2.1<br />

15-30 8.4-8.6 0.3-0.5 2.5-4.4<br />

7. Mid Tail<br />

Ahulana<br />

(Sonipat)<br />

Rajbir<br />

singh<br />

0-15 7.9-8.2 1.1-8.6 1.4-10.6<br />

15-30 7.8-8.1 1.9-9.7 1.7-<strong>11</strong>.1<br />

8. Mid Tail<br />

Ahulana<br />

(Sonipat)<br />

Azad 0-15 8.1-8.3 0.5-3.3 3.4-7.1<br />

15-30 7.6-8.4 0.9-4.5 5.7-19.6<br />

9. Mid Head<br />

Ahulana<br />

(Sonipat)<br />

Wazir<br />

singh<br />

0-15 8.3-8.4 1.1-1.7 1.2-3.0<br />

15-30 8.3-8.7 0.4-0.8 2.8-4.8<br />

10 Tail Tail<br />

<strong>11</strong> Tail Mid<br />

Chhichhrana<br />

(Sonipat)<br />

Sanghi (Rohtak)<br />

12 Tail Tail Sanghi (Rohtak)<br />

Satish<br />

Ram<br />

Naveen<br />

Kumar<br />

Ashish<br />

Singh<br />

0-15 8.0-8.3 0.4-1.4 2.5-4.0<br />

15-30 7.4-8.4 0.5-3.6 3.1-6.9<br />

0-15 8.2-8.5 0.5-0.7 1.0-2.9<br />

15-30 7.8-8.4 0.5-0.6 1.3-3.5<br />

0-15 8.0-8.4 1.1-2.2 7.0-10.2<br />

15-30 7.8-8.4 0.8-1.4 5.7-8.4<br />

modelling, constraints, BMP based strategies<br />

and farmer’s services. Canal network, crops,<br />

soils, rainfall, canal flow and ET sub-modules<br />

under first two modules were completed and<br />

tested.<br />

Fig. 23 : An interface of DSS for the WYC<br />

In stakeholders’ servicing, 170 water user<br />

association members and farmers from Sonipat,<br />

and Rohtak districts were imparted training<br />

on management strategies for sustaining/<br />

enhancing crop yield under inadequate<br />

water supply, conjunctive use of poor quality<br />

groundwater with canal water, ongoing<br />

49


Management of water logging/saline soils <strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

Table 29 : Field demonstrations with initial water status at the time of sowing<br />

Field Village Farmer Groundwater quality Problem (s) Intervention (s)<br />

EC e<br />

SAR iw<br />

RSC<br />

1. Butana Khetlan<br />

(Sonipat)<br />

Kapoor<br />

Singh<br />

3.4 6.14 0.0 Deficit canal supply,<br />

saline soil and marginal<br />

saline water<br />

Salt tolerant<br />

variety (KRL-<br />

19)<br />

2. Butana Kundu<br />

(Sonipat)<br />

Amit<br />

Singh<br />

3.3 20.1 8.8 Deficit canal supply,<br />

normal soil and highly<br />

alkali water<br />

Salt tolerant<br />

variety (KRL-<br />

19)<br />

3. Butana Kundu<br />

(Sonipat)<br />

Rajbir<br />

Singh<br />

8.0 17.4 0.0 Deficit canal supply,<br />

normal soil and high<br />

SAR saline water<br />

Salt tolerant<br />

variety (KRL-<br />

19)<br />

4. Butana Khetlan<br />

(Sonipat)<br />

Anand<br />

Kumar<br />

4.2 3.5 0.0 Deficit canal supply,<br />

normal soil and saline<br />

water<br />

Conjunctive<br />

use (UGPL)<br />

and DBW-17<br />

HY variety<br />

5. Butana Khetlan<br />

(Sonipat)<br />

Jagat<br />

Singh<br />

4.4 3.2 0.0 Deficit canal supply,<br />

slight saline soil and<br />

saline water<br />

Conjunctive<br />

use and DBW-<br />

17 variety<br />

6. Khanpur Khurd<br />

(Sonipat)<br />

Ramphal 1.9 8.5 2.5 Deficit canal supply,<br />

normal soil and<br />

marginally alkali water<br />

Conjunctive<br />

use and DBW-<br />

17 variety<br />

7. Ahulana (Sonipat) Rajbir 3.0 5.7 0.0 Very deficit canal<br />

supply, saline soil and<br />

marginal saline water<br />

8. Ahulana (Sonipat) Azad 7.1 2.7 0.0 Very deficit canal<br />

supply, slight saline soil<br />

and saline water<br />

9. Ahulana (Sonipat) Wazir<br />

singh<br />

10 Chhichhrana<br />

(Sonipat)<br />

Satish<br />

Ram<br />

<strong>11</strong> Sanghi (Rohtak) Naveen<br />

Kumar<br />

12 Sanghi (Rohtak) Ashish<br />

Singh<br />

2.7 2.7 0.0 Deficit canal supply,<br />

normal soil and<br />

marginal saline water<br />

4.7 16.6 0.0 Very deficit canal<br />

supply (LWC), normal<br />

soil and high SAR saline<br />

water<br />

1.5 9.2 6.3 Very deficit canal<br />

supply (LWC), normal<br />

soil and alkali water<br />

3.1 20.0 5.8 Very deficit canal<br />

supply, normal soil and<br />

highly alkali water<br />

Note: DBW-17: High yielding variety for normal soils by DWR, Karnal<br />

UGPL: Under ground pipe line for bringing good quality water, LWC: Lined watercourse<br />

Salt tolerant<br />

variety (KRL-<br />

19)<br />

Conjunctive<br />

use and DBW-<br />

17 variety<br />

Irrigation<br />

scheduling<br />

and DBW-17<br />

variety<br />

Salt tolerant<br />

variety (KRL-<br />

19)<br />

Irrigation<br />

scheduling<br />

with zero<br />

tillage and<br />

DBW-17<br />

variety<br />

Conjunctive<br />

use with<br />

zero tillage<br />

and DBW-17<br />

variety<br />

50


<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

Management of water logging/saline soils<br />

secondary soil salinization, waterlogging<br />

and low soil fertility whereas twenty senior<br />

officers from CADA, Agriculture and Irrigation<br />

Department, and KVKs were trained on ‘Use<br />

of modern tools and management strategies<br />

for enhancing productivity in irrigated saline<br />

environment. Twenty project partners and staff<br />

were also trained at IIRS, Dehradun to inculcate<br />

the requisite skills for undertaking performance<br />

evaluation of canal command. A project website<br />

using ASP.NET, Javascript and HTML is<br />

updated regularly and can be accessed (http://<br />

cssri.talents.co.in) for dissemination of project<br />

information including achievements, partners’<br />

meetings, upcoming trainings and workshops<br />

to the stakeholders.<br />

Impact of Changing Trend in Weather, <strong>Soil</strong><br />

and Water Parameters on Crop Productivity<br />

in Fresh and Saline Groundwater Zones of<br />

Haryana (Pragati Maity, Satyendra Kumar, D.S.<br />

Bundela and S.K. Kamra)<br />

The rice- wheat cropping system, widely<br />

prevalent in the Indo-Gangetic Plain, is showing<br />

signs of fatigue with declining productivity<br />

in many areas. Impact of changing trend in<br />

weather, soil and water parameters on crop<br />

productivity is needed to be studied. Climate<br />

is perhaps the most important determinant of<br />

agricultural productivity. In order to study the<br />

changing trend of weather parameters at Karnal,<br />

37 years meteorological data were analyzed.<br />

The meteorological data were recorded from<br />

Agromet observatory situated at <strong>Central</strong><br />

<strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Salinity</strong> <strong>Research</strong> Institute. Average and<br />

decadal value of rainfall and rainy days (Table<br />

30) showed that except for rainfall of 1991-2000<br />

decade (where rainfall is more than long-term<br />

average annual rainfall) there is decrease in<br />

both average rainfall and rainy days in other<br />

periods. Decadal mean rainfall during monsoon<br />

months has a decreasing trend for July and<br />

August but an increasing trend for the month of<br />

June and September (Table 31). Similarly, while<br />

the number of rainy days in July and August is<br />

decreasing, these have remained almost constant<br />

during June and September. It indicated that the<br />

probability of getting high intensity rainfall is<br />

increasing in September month.<br />

Decade wise changes in monthly average<br />

maximum and minimum temperature, bright<br />

sun shine (BSS) hours and a number of other<br />

parameters were analysed. Trend analysis of<br />

BSS hours during 1983- 2009 showed that the<br />

average annual BSS of Karnal is 90.4 hr and it is<br />

decreasing @ 0.67 hr per year during the study<br />

period (Fig. 24).<br />

The analysis of block wise groundwater<br />

fluctuations for Karnal district from June, 1974<br />

(pre-monsoon) - June, 2005 depicts an average<br />

decline of 6.53 m @ 0.21 m decline per annum for<br />

the Karnal district as a whole (Table 32) and at<br />

0.08 m to 0.29 m per annum in different blocks.<br />

The declining watertable is becoming more<br />

Fig. 24 : Trend analysis of bright sun shine hours (BSS)<br />

during 1983- 2009<br />

Table 30 : Average and decadal value of rainfall and rainy days at Karnal during 1972-2009<br />

Weather<br />

parameters<br />

Average value<br />

(1972-2009)<br />

Average decadal value<br />

1972-80 1981-90 1991-00 2001-2009<br />

Rainfall (mm) 736 772.0 717.9 825.2 622.2<br />

Rainy days 47.4 58 52 43 37<br />

51


Management of water logging/saline soils <strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

and more rapid with time, being the highest in<br />

the period from 1999- 2005. Similar results are<br />

obtained for October (post- monsoon) period<br />

with an average decline of 6.77 m in the district<br />

@ 0.22 m decline per annum, which is about the<br />

same as in June i.e. 0.21 m annum -1 .<br />

Table 31 : Decade-wise average rainfall and rainy days in monsoon months<br />

Month<br />

Average rainfall (mm)<br />

Average rainy days<br />

1972-80 1981-90 1991-00 2001-09 1972-80 1981-90 1991-00 2001-09<br />

June 87.0 71.0 108.8 102.7 6 5 5 6<br />

July 262.2 195.5 203.1 <strong>11</strong>3.9 14 12 9 7<br />

Aug 218.2 186.0 223.7 120.6 14 <strong>11</strong> <strong>11</strong> 7<br />

Sept 76.3 80.2 <strong>11</strong>3.6 126.7 6 5 5 5<br />

Table 32 : Fluctuation of groundwater level (+) rise, (-) fall in Karnal district (June 1974 to June 2005)<br />

Sr.<br />

No.<br />

Block Fluctuation (m) Av. annual<br />

fluctuation (m)<br />

1974-79 1974-84 1974-89 1974-94 1974- 99 1974-2005 (June 1974-05)<br />

1 Karnal -0.25 -1.52 -3.18 -4.84 -2.28 -6.45 -0.20<br />

2 Indri -0.44 +0.07 -0.35 -1.20 +0.24 -2.77 -0.08<br />

3 Nilokheri +0.42 -0.38 -1.52 -2.94 -0.62 -5.69 -0.18<br />

4 Nissang +0.30 -1.79 -3.71 -6.05 -2.15 -7.79 -0.25<br />

5 Gharaunda +0.50 -1.79 -3.74 -7.67 -4.16 -9.<strong>11</strong> -0.29<br />

6 Assandh +1.09 -2.05 -4.01 -7.02 -2.18 -7.41 -0.24<br />

Average +0.27 -1.24 -2.76 -4.95 -1.87 -6.53 -0.21<br />

<br />

52


<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

MANAGEMENT OF MARGINAL QUALITY WATER<br />

Wastewater Use in Non-food Crops (Khajanchi<br />

Lal, R.K. Yadav, P. Dey, D.S. Bundela, S.K.<br />

Chaudhari and Madhu Chaudhary)<br />

Indiscriminate use of wastewater loaded with<br />

toxic elements and harmful pathogens pollutes<br />

our natural resources and impairs human<br />

health. For safe and sustainable disposal of<br />

wastewater in non-food crops like Eucalyptus,<br />

cut flower, aromatic and medicinal plants and<br />

finding the efficacy of low cost amendments for<br />

heavy metal removal from wastewater, field<br />

and lysimeteric experiments on the carrying<br />

capacity of cloned Eucalyptus, marigold (Tagetes<br />

erecta) and aromatic crops like Lemon grass<br />

(Cymbopogon flexosus), Nigundi (Vitex nigundo)<br />

and Tukham Malanga (Salvia aegyptica) were<br />

initiated at <strong>CSSRI</strong>, Karnal in rabi season of 2007-<br />

08 and were continued during <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong>.<br />

Eucalyptus trees planted in 2005 were irrigated<br />

with wastewater at IW/CPE ratio of 1.0, 2.0,<br />

2.5, 3.0 and control (no irrigation) and tube<br />

well irrigation at 1.0 IW/CPE since May 2008.<br />

Changes in water table depth, transpiration<br />

rate and tree height, diameter at stump and<br />

breast height were monitored regularly. Use<br />

of wastewater varying from 1 to 3 IW/CPE<br />

ratio resulted in 7.3 to 15.3 per cent increase in<br />

tree diameter at breast height and 4.4 to <strong>11</strong>.1<br />

per cent increase in height compared to tube<br />

well irrigation given at 1.0 IW/CPE. Amongst<br />

different wastewater treatments, both height and<br />

DBH increased by 7 per cent with the increase<br />

in IW/CPE ratio from 1.0 to 2.5. Increase in soil<br />

pH, EC, OC, available N, P, K and essential<br />

micronutrients with wastewater use were<br />

recorded. Because the wastewater of domestic<br />

nature, build-up of Cd, Cr, Pb and Ni was not<br />

observed in the soil. Transpiration rate of 5 years<br />

old trees was measured using sap flow sensors<br />

and the results indicated that on an average, 5-7<br />

mm of wastewater can be disposed in Eucalyptus<br />

planted at tree density of 1250 trees ha -1 .<br />

Frequency of irrigation had no particular effect<br />

on ground water table. Aromatic and medicinal<br />

plants like Lemon grass, Nirgundi and Tukham<br />

Fig. 25 : Metal contents in Nirgundi and Lemon grass oil<br />

Malanga raised with wastewater irrigation at<br />

0.6, 0.8, 1.0, 1.2 and 1.5 IW/CPE ratios either<br />

alone or in conjunction with tube well water in<br />

lysimeter in October 2007 were also monitored<br />

during the year <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong>. The biomass and oil<br />

yield increased with increasing wastewater<br />

application rate from 0.6 to 1.5 IW/CPE and also<br />

higher when compared to the respective level<br />

of tube well irrigation. Wastewater application<br />

either alone or in conjunction with tube well<br />

water produced more or less the same plant<br />

biomass and oil yield. Oil analysis indicated that<br />

Cu, Zn and Fe contents was higher in Nirgundi<br />

compared to Lemon grass. The levels of Ni, Cd,<br />

Cr and Pb in the oil of both the crops were very<br />

low and below the permissible limit (Fig. 25).<br />

Microbial Bioremediation of Wastewater for<br />

Heavy Metals (P.K.Joshi)<br />

Biomass of microbes acts as adsorbent to<br />

remove heavy metals from wastewater. The<br />

ability to remove heavy metals from wastewater<br />

varies greatly among microbes. This needs to<br />

be exploited for removal of heavy metals from<br />

wastewater through efficient microbes.<br />

Effect of inoculum size on removal of Pb, Cd<br />

and Ni by efficient fungi and bacteria<br />

Two fungi i.e. Trichoderma longibrachiatum, T.<br />

fasciculatum and two bacteria i.e. Bacillus cereus,<br />

B. sp. were tested for removal of heavy metals<br />

(Pb, Cd, Ni) at different inoculum levels. T.<br />

longibrachiatum showed higher Pb removal<br />

capacity (80.50%) than T. fasciculatum (71.00%)<br />

53


Management of marginal quality water <strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

at 3.0 per cent inoculum size (Fig. 26) whereas<br />

T. longibrachiatum removed higher Cd (89.85%)<br />

at 2.0 per cent inoculum size as compared to T.<br />

fasciculatum which removed (62.60%) Cd at 2.5<br />

per cent inoculum size. Ni removal capacity<br />

was also higher for T. longibrachiatum (59.20%)<br />

as compared to T. fasciculatum (42.55%) at 2<br />

per cent inoculum size from potato dextrose<br />

broth containing 20 mg/l of Pb, Cd and Ni<br />

individually.<br />

Bacillus cereus showed higher Pb, Ni removal<br />

capacity (55.90% and 40.75%) than B. sp.<br />

(43.50% and 23.50%) at inoculum size of 2.5<br />

and 2 per cent, respectively from nutrient broth<br />

containing 20 ppm of Pb and Ni individually.<br />

Cd removal capacity was higher for Bacillus sp.<br />

(39.60%) as compared to Bacillus cereus (24.30%)<br />

at 0.5 per cent inoculum size from nutrient broth<br />

containing 20 ppm of Cd (Fig. 27).<br />

Fig. 26 : Effect of inoculum size on per cent removal<br />

and uptake of Pb from potato dextrose broth<br />

containing 20 ppm of Pb by T. facciculatum<br />

and T.longitbrachiatum<br />

Fig. 27 : Effect of inoculum size on per cent removal and<br />

uptake of Cd from nutrient broth containing 20<br />

ppm of Cd by Bacillus cereus and Bacillus Sp.<br />

Removal of heavy metals by efficient fungi<br />

grown on agrowaste materials<br />

Consortium of five fungi (Aspergillus niger,<br />

A. terreus, T. longibrachiatum, T. fasciculatum,<br />

A. awamori) and two bacteria (Bacillus cereus,<br />

Bacillus sp.) in combination with different<br />

agro-waste material like charcoal, press mud,<br />

rice straw, FYM and rice husk were tested for<br />

removal of heavy metals (Cr, Cu, Ni) from<br />

industrial effluents. Data indicated encouraging<br />

results with microbial consortium along with<br />

press mud in comparison to press mud alone or<br />

other agro-waste materials.<br />

Trichoderma longibrachiatum removed<br />

maximum Pb, Cd and Ni at 2-3 per cent<br />

inoculum size whereas B. cereus and Bacillus<br />

sp. removed Pb, Cd and Ni at 0.5-2.5 per cent<br />

inoculum size from liquid medium. There<br />

was higher removal of Cr, Cu and Ni from<br />

industrial effluents by microbial consortium<br />

in combination with press mud.<br />

Evaluation of <strong>Salinity</strong> Tolerance of Coriander,<br />

Fennel and Fenugreek Seed Spices (R.K. Yadav,<br />

R. L. Meena, M. Sethi and J. C. Dagar)<br />

<strong>CSSRI</strong>, Karnal (Haryana) and NRCSS, Ajmer<br />

(Rajasthan) initiated a collaborative project<br />

on assessment of overall and stage dependant<br />

tolerance of seed spices to salinity and its<br />

impact on their quality so as to boost seed spice<br />

production under salt stress. Field experiment<br />

on assessment of overall and stage dependant<br />

tolerance of fennel (Foeniculum vulgare),<br />

coriander (Coriandrum sativum) and fenugreek<br />

(Trigonella foenum-graecum L.) to low (3.6 dS m -1 ),<br />

high (8.7 dS m -1 ) and their alternate conjunctive<br />

irrigations was carried out at Bir Forest Farm<br />

Hisar. Further in a pot experiment conducted<br />

at <strong>CSSRI</strong>, Karnal (Haryana), 12 cultivars of each<br />

of coriander and fennel were irrigated with 0.6,<br />

3.0, 6.0, 9.0 and 12.0 dS m -1 salinity water for<br />

assessing their comparative tolerance.<br />

Fennel was observed to be relatively more<br />

tolerant to saline water irrigation as the decrease<br />

in yield (Table 33) from continuous use of low<br />

saline (3.6 dS m -1 ) water for irrigation, alternate<br />

irrigations of low (3.6 dS m -1 ) and high (8.7 dS<br />

54


<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

Management of marginal quality water<br />

Table 33 : Seed and total biomass yields of coriander, fennel and fenugreek under different modes of saline<br />

water irrigation<br />

Crop/mode of<br />

irrigation<br />

Coriander (t ha -1 ) Fennel (t ha -1 ) *Fenugreek (t ha -1 )<br />

Biomass Seed Yield Biomass Seed Yield Biomass Seed Yield<br />

Low 1.57 0.98 2.02 1.15 0.43 0.22<br />

Alternate 1.52 0.92 1.98 1.09 0.51 0.30<br />

High saline 1.21 0.71 1.71 0.91 0.40 0.19<br />

LSD (p=0.05) 0.18 0.10 0.22 0.18 NA NA<br />

Crops: Seed-0.20; Biomass-0.34; Irrigation water salinity : Seed-0.24; Biomass-0.38; Irrig x<br />

crop: seed- 0.22; biomass-0.35<br />

*Crop was damaged heavily by rabbits; NA- not analyzed for statistical comparison<br />

m -1 ) salinity water, and irrigations with high<br />

salinity (8.7 dS m -1 ) water was to the extent of<br />

4.7 and 20 per cent in seed yield, and about 2<br />

and 15 per cent in total biomass production,<br />

respectively. In comparison to above extent of<br />

decrease in fennel, the seed and biomass yield of<br />

coriander decreased about 6 and 27 per cent and<br />

3 and 23 per cent, respectively indicating that<br />

coriander was comparatively more sensitive to<br />

saline environment than fennel. We could not<br />

ascertain the salinity tolerance of fenugreek<br />

because of the extensive rabbit damage in the<br />

crop. So, the seed and biomass yield data of<br />

fenugreek given in Table 33 are not conclusive.<br />

As the salinity of irrigation water increased,<br />

there was decrease in vegetative as well as<br />

reproductive growth of fennel and coriander.<br />

However, reproductive growth i.e umbels and<br />

seed yield was more affected than vegetative<br />

growth.<br />

The genetic differences in salinity tolerance<br />

of diverse germplasm of fennel and coriander<br />

were evaluated in the pot study, where relative<br />

yield reduction in each variety of two crops in<br />

response to salinity levels was worked out using<br />

piece-wise linear response [Salt model; RY= 100-<br />

a (Irrigation water salinity- b)] fitted to yield<br />

in response to salinity. Constants of slope of<br />

decrease in yield in response to unit increase in<br />

salinity (a) and thresh hold limits of salinity (b)<br />

beyond which yield of a given variety of fennel<br />

and coriander starts declining are worked out<br />

and presented in Table 34 and 35, respectively.<br />

Table 34 : Piece-wise linear response model constants for fennel cultivars in relation to irrigation water<br />

salinity<br />

Varities/Paratmeters a b r <strong>Salinity</strong> tolerance rank<br />

GF-1 2.6 4.64 **0.93 3<br />

GF-2 2.9 4.39 **0.91 4<br />

RF-101 3.6 3.82 **0.89 8<br />

PF-35 2.3 4.67 **0.90 2<br />

RF-178 2.2 4.86 **0.92 1<br />

GF-<strong>11</strong> 3.9 3.74 **0.87 10<br />

CO-1 3.2 3.97 **0.94 6<br />

Hisar Swarup 4.1 3.79 **0.91 9<br />

Pant Madhirika 3.1 4.18 **0.89 5<br />

Azad Sawnt 3.4 3.86 **0.92 7<br />

NRCSS-AF-1 4.1 3.70 **0.93 <strong>11</strong><br />

Rajendra Sawrna 4.0 3.68 **0.90 12<br />

55


Management of marginal quality water <strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

It is evident from the data that in fennel variety<br />

RF-178, PF-35 and GF-1 were most tolerant to<br />

salinity whereas Rajendra Sawrna, NRCSS-<br />

AF-1 and GF-<strong>11</strong> were most sensitive. In case of<br />

coriander, the most tolerant was seed cum leafy<br />

type variety RCR-41, which had a threshold<br />

‘b’ value of 4.57 dS m -1 with slope ‘a’ of – 0.021,<br />

followed by GCR-2 and CO-2, whereas Pant<br />

Haritma, Sadhna and Swathi were among the<br />

least tolerant ones.<br />

The results suggested that fennel is more<br />

tolerant than coriander to saline water irrigation.<br />

The deleterious effects of high salinity water<br />

irrigation could be minimized by alternate<br />

irrigations of low and high salinity water as the<br />

yield realized with this mode was at par with<br />

that of continuous irrigation of low salinity<br />

water and significantly better than continuous<br />

irrigations with high salinity water. Further,<br />

RF-178, PF-35 and GF-1 varieties of fennel and<br />

RCR-446, GCR-2 and CO-2 varieties of coriander<br />

were found to be suitable for cultivation with<br />

high salinity irrigation water.<br />

Table 35 : Linear piece-wise model response constants for coriander cultivars in relation to irrigation water<br />

salinity<br />

Varities a b r <strong>Salinity</strong> tolerance rank<br />

NRCSS-Acr-1 (Veg/leafy) 4.5 3.64 **0.93 7<br />

GCR-2 (Seed) 2.7 4.18 **0.91 2<br />

RCR-41 (Veg/leafy) 4.6 3.56 **0.89 9<br />

RCR446 (Seed/leafy) 2.1 4.57 **0.90 1<br />

CO-2 (Seed) 3.0 4.06 **0.92 3<br />

Hisar Sugandha (Leafy/ seed) 4.0 3.71 **0.87 5<br />

Rajendra Swathi (Seed) 3.8 3.87 **0.92 4<br />

Sadhana (Seed) 4.9 3.49 **0.91 <strong>11</strong><br />

Swathi (Seed) 4.8 3.54 **0.89 10<br />

Azad Dhania (Veg/leafy) 4.4 3.61 **0.92 8<br />

CO4 (Seed) 4.3 3.68 **0.93 6<br />

Pant Haritma (Leafy) 5.1 3.52 **0.90 12<br />

<br />

56


<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

CROP IMPROVEMENT FOR SALINITY, ALKALINITY AND<br />

WATERLOGGING STRESSES<br />

Genetic Improvement of Rice for Salt Tolerance<br />

(S.L. Krishna Murthy, Ali Qadar and P. Dey)<br />

This project aims at the development, evaluation<br />

and dissemination of salt tolerant rice genotypes.<br />

To achieve the objectives, following trials were<br />

conducted and material maintained during<br />

kharif <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

Station trials<br />

Preliminary evaluation trial<br />

A total of 40 entries including check varieties<br />

were screened in the normal, moderate (pH 2<br />

~ 9.5), and saline (EC e<br />

~10.0 dS m -1 ) soils in<br />

the micro plots in RBD with two replications.<br />

Under normal conditions, RIL (CSR<strong>11</strong>/MI 48)-<br />

178 gave the highest yield (9.33 t ha -1 ), followed<br />

by CSR 36 (8.16 t ha -1 ), CN 1266-26-177 (6.93<br />

t ha -1 ) and BULK-8 (6.67 t ha -1 ). CSR 36 (5.87 t<br />

ha -1 ) again out- performed from all entries in<br />

moderate sodic soil followed by CSR 23 (4.67<br />

t ha -1 ), BULK-19 (4.40 t ha -1 ) and RIL (CSR<strong>11</strong>/<br />

MI 48)-1(4.13 t ha -1 ). Under high salinity, CSR<br />

23 performed best (3.79 t ha -1 ) followed by RIL<br />

(CSR<strong>11</strong>/MI 48)-178 (2.68 t ha -1 ), CSR 36 (2.65 t<br />

ha -1 ) and BULK-22 (1.94 t ha -1 ). Overall results<br />

indicated that CSR 36, RIL (CSR<strong>11</strong>/MI 48)-178,<br />

CSR-RIL (CSR 27/MI 48)-1 and CSR 23 to be<br />

high yielding and stress resilient genotypes.<br />

Yield evaluation trial<br />

This experiment was planned to evaluate the<br />

comparative yield performance of 34 genotypes<br />

including high yield potential varieties along<br />

with salt tolerant varieties across normal,<br />

moderate sodic (pH 2<br />

9.5), high sodic (pH 2<br />

9.9)<br />

and highly saline (EC e<br />

~ 10.0 dS m -1 ) microplots.<br />

Under normal conditions, BCW 56 gave the<br />

highest yield (9.23 t ha -1 ), followed by IR77674-<br />

3B-8-1-3-14-2-AJY3 (7.16 t ha -1 ), VSR 156 (6.58<br />

t ha -1 ) and IR 77674-3B-8-1-3-13-2-AJY2 (6.32<br />

t ha -1 ). CSR 36 out-performed all entries in<br />

moderate sodic soil (6.67 t ha -1 ) followed by<br />

CSR-RIL (CSR 27/MI 48)-169 (6.08 t ha -1 ), HKR<br />

47 (6.01 t ha -1 ) and CSR 23 (5.78 t ha -1 ). Similarly,<br />

in high sodic soil, CSR-RIL (CSR27/MI48)-197,<br />

CSR 36, IR60997-16-2-3-2-2R and IR77674-3B-8-<br />

1-3-14-2-AJY3 yielded 2.47, 1.97, 1.61 and 1.57 t<br />

ha -1 , respectively. Under high salinity, HKR 120<br />

performed best (2.71 t ha -1 ) followed by CSR27<br />

(2.57 t ha -1 ) and HKR 127 (2.56 t ha -1 ). Overall<br />

results indicated that CSR 36, CSR-RIL(CSR 27/<br />

MI 48)-169, CSR-RIL (CSR27/MI48)-197, HKR<br />

127, IR 60997-16-2-3-2-2R and CSR 23 to be high<br />

yielding and stress resilient genotypes.<br />

National trials<br />

Alkaline and inland saline tolerant varietal trial<br />

Nineteen genotypes were evaluated with salt<br />

tolerant check varieties under high sodic (pH 2<br />

~ 9.9) and saline (EC e<br />

~10.0 dSm -1 ) soils in micro<br />

plots under field conditions in RBD with two<br />

replications. In high sodic soil, 2001 (2.12 t ha -1 )<br />

out yielded all the entries followed by 2004 (1.62<br />

t ha -1 ) and 2018 (1.62 t ha -1 ) and CSR 36 (1.58 t<br />

ha -1 ). Under salinity stress, 2001 showed the<br />

highest paddy yield (3.19 t ha -1 ) followed by<br />

CSR 23 (2.77 t ha -1 ), 2002 (2.74 t ha -1 ), 2008 (2.57 t<br />

ha -1 ), 2009 (2.50 t ha -1 ).<br />

National salinity/alkalinity screening nursery<br />

A total of 48 entries including check variety were<br />

screened in the high sodic (pH 2<br />

~ 9.9) and saline<br />

(EC e<br />

~ 10.0 dS m -1 ) soils in the micro plots in RBD<br />

with two replications. In high sodic soil, 3825<br />

(3.79 t ha -1 ) out yielded all the entries followed<br />

by 3847 (3.49 t ha -1 ) and 3848 (2.87 t ha -1 ).<br />

Advanced bulks, segregating lines and<br />

germplasm<br />

A total of 196 segregating lines derived from<br />

different crosses were multiplied. A total of<br />

379 genetic stocks were grown in the field for<br />

maintenance. Besides, 229 advance stabilized<br />

lines were maintained.<br />

National Project on Transgenics in Crops-<br />

<strong>Salinity</strong> Tolerance in Rice : Functional<br />

Genomics Component (ICAR funded) (S. L.<br />

Krishna Murthy and S. K. Sharma)<br />

The main aim of this project is to map the<br />

important genomic regions/QTLs controlling<br />

sodicity tolerance traits in rice. This involves<br />

57


Crop improvement for salinity, alkalinity and waterlogging stresses <strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

collaborative work between <strong>CSSRI</strong> (for<br />

phenotyping) and NRC on Plant Bio-technology,<br />

New Delhi (for genotyping).<br />

The salient findings of the systematic phenotyping<br />

of 216 recombinant inbred lines (RILs)<br />

derived from CSR <strong>11</strong> x MI 48 cross are reported<br />

here. A total of 225 genotypes including 216 RILs<br />

with parents were phenotyped in replicated<br />

Simple Lattice Design with 3 environments<br />

{normal, moderate (pH 2<br />

~9.5) and high sodic<br />

(pH 2<br />

~ 9.9) soil conditions} in microplots. Data on<br />

range, mean and relative sensitivity of different<br />

traits for these lines as recorded during kharif<br />

<strong>2010</strong> are presented in Table 36.<br />

Grain yield and biomass were the most sensitive<br />

traits and were reduced by 40 and 39 per cent<br />

under moderate sodicity stress followed by<br />

number of grains/panicle (33 %), spike let<br />

fertility (21 %), plant height (13 %), total tillers/<br />

plant (13 %), panicle length and productive<br />

tillers/plant (8 %) and 1000 grain weight (6%).<br />

Grain yield and biomass were the most sensitive<br />

traits in high sodicity stress and were reduced<br />

by 74 and 70 per cent under high sodicity stress<br />

followed by number of grains/panicle (58%),<br />

plant height (41%) spikelet fertility (38%) total<br />

tillers/plant (36%), productive tillers/plant (34<br />

%) panicle length (26%) and 1000 grain weight<br />

(16%).<br />

Development and Evaluation of Salt Tolerant<br />

Transgenic Rice-DBT funded (S.K. Sharma,<br />

S.L. Krishna Murthy and R.K. Gautam)<br />

Based on the relatively better performance of<br />

TPSP(Trehalose Phosphate Synthase Phosphatase)<br />

rice plant progenies and TPSP gene confirmation<br />

in 2009, selected eight better progenies viz., ICG<br />

A18-2-R1, ICG TA7-1-3-R1, ICG TA7-2-1-R1,<br />

ICG A18-4-R2, ICG TA7-1-4-R2, ICG TA7-2-1-<br />

R2, DR7-<strong>11</strong>-3-R2 and ICG A18-2-R2, which<br />

were further evaluated for tolerance to salinity<br />

and sodicity during <strong>2010</strong> under transgenic<br />

green house conditions at <strong>CSSRI</strong>, Karnal. Two<br />

sets of TPSP lines were planted under high<br />

saline (EC e<br />

~10 dS m -1 ) and high sodic (pH 2<br />

~9.9)<br />

environment in microplots. Therefore, a total of<br />

12 genotypes including 8 events (ICG A18-2-R1,<br />

Table 36 : Range, mean and reduction in traits of CSR <strong>11</strong> x MI 48 RILs under sodic conditions<br />

Traits Range Mean % reduction<br />

Normal MS HS Normal MS HS MS HS<br />

Plant height<br />

(cm) 71.1 - 173.8 60.8- 134.0 22.3-81.4 95.45 83.18 55.84 13 41<br />

Panicle length<br />

(cm) 17.9 - 32.2 16.4 - 29.4 5.8 - 19.9 22.61 20.91 16.79 8 26<br />

Total tillers/<br />

plant 7.6 - 21.4 7 - 20.2 1.3 - 16.0 12.18 10.76 7.83 12 36<br />

Productive<br />

tillers/plant 5.2 – 19.0 5.4 - 18.4 0.83 - 15.3 10.58 9.74 6.96 8 34<br />

No. of grains/<br />

panicle 34.5 - 175.1 18.66- 91.6 6.66 - 55.8 90.05 60.70 37.63 33 58<br />

1000-grain<br />

weight (g) 12.61 - 31.2 9.71 - 28. 4 7.56 - 26.1 23.62 22.12 19.89 6 16<br />

Spikelet<br />

fertility (%) 57.06 - 87.9 17. 3 - 77.6 8.33 - 53.0 73.41 58.03 45.62 21 38<br />

Grain yield/<br />

plant (g) 19- 232.5 12.0 - 99.0 0.5 – 53.0 68.06 41.03 17.60 40 74<br />

Biological<br />

yield/plant (g) 68 – 620 35.5- 245.5 3.5 – 180.0 197.53 120.35 58.52 39 70<br />

MS-Moderately sodicity; HS- High sodicity<br />

58


<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

Crop improvement for salinity, alkalinity and waterlogging stresses<br />

ICG TA7-1-3-R1, ICG TA7-2-1-R1, ICG A18-4-<br />

R2, ICG TA7-1-4-R2, ICG TA7-2-1-R2, DR7-<strong>11</strong>-<br />

3-R2 and ICG A18-2-R2), control (IR64), tolerant<br />

checks (CSR10 and CSR 23) and sensitive<br />

check (VSR156) were replicated twice under<br />

high salinity stress. Six transgenic progenies<br />

survived and two died under high salinity<br />

stress (EC e<br />

~10 dS m -1 ). Spikelet fertility/panicle<br />

of TPSP rice progenies recorded in high saline<br />

conditions (Fig 28). Among transgenic plants,<br />

ICG A18-2-R1 (58.92%) performed well and<br />

its performance was at par with check CSR 10<br />

(59.00%). ICG A18-2-R1 (58.92%) and ICG TA7-<br />

1-4-R2 (58.04 %) performed better than other<br />

check CSR 23 (52.86%). Yield/plant of TPSP rice<br />

progenies recorded in high saline conditions<br />

(Fig. 29) and their performance was well i e ICG<br />

A18-2-R1 (6.61g), ICG TA7-1-3-R1 (3.70g), ICG<br />

TA7-2-1-R1 (3.07g) and ICG TA7-1-4-R2 (5.05g).<br />

Expression of transgenic plant progenies ICG<br />

A18-2-R1 (6.61g), ICG TA7-1-3-R1 (3.70g) and<br />

ICG TA7-1-4-R2 (5.05g) was better.<br />

On the other hand, 12 genotypes encompassing<br />

12 TPSP plant progenies (ICG A18-1R2, ICG<br />

TA7-1-3 R2, ICG TA7-1-5 R2, ICG A-18-1 R1, ICG<br />

A-18-2 R2, ICG A-18-5 R2, DR7-<strong>11</strong>-4 R1 and ICG<br />

A18-4 R2 ), control (IR64), tolerant check (CSR 10<br />

and CSR 23) and sensitive check (VSR156) were<br />

also planted under high sodic stress (pH~9.96)<br />

with 2 replications. Six transgenic progenies<br />

survived and two died under high sodic stress<br />

(pH~9.9). Yield performance of TPSP plant<br />

progenies is presented in Fig 30.<br />

Fig 28 : Spikelet fertility/panicle of TPSP rice lines in<br />

saline conditions (EC e<br />

~10 dS m -1 ).<br />

Fig 29 :Yield of TPSP rice progenies in saline conditions<br />

(EC e<br />

~10 dS m -1 ).<br />

Fig 30 : Yield of TPSP rice lines in high sodic conditions<br />

(pH 2<br />

~9.9).<br />

Enhancing and Stabilizing the Productivity of<br />

Salt Affected Areas by Incorporating Genes<br />

for Tolerance of Abiotic Stresses in Rice<br />

(BMZ-IRRI funded) (S.K. Sharma, Ali Qadar,<br />

R.K. Gautam, Y.P. Singh, T. Damodaran, B.K.<br />

Bandyopadhyay, D. Burman, S.K. Sarangi and<br />

S. Mandal)<br />

A total of 40 SALTOL derivatives (developed at<br />

IRRI, Philippines) with four salt tolerant check<br />

varieties viz CSR 10, CSR 23, CSR 27 and CSR<br />

36 and one sensitive variety (VSR 156) were<br />

evaluated. The materials were evaluated under<br />

normal, sodic moderate sodic pH~9.5 and<br />

high sodic pH~9.9) and saline (EC e<br />

~10 dS m -1 )<br />

environments of precisely controlled microplot<br />

facility at <strong>CSSRI</strong>, Karnal during kharif <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

Among SALTOL introgressed lines, genotypes<br />

IR 85212-56-10 and IR 84645-305-6-1-B were<br />

59


Crop improvement for salinity, alkalinity and waterlogging stresses <strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

each environment. Though salt tolerant check<br />

variety CSR 23 out yielded all lines in almost all<br />

the environments, among SALTOL derivatives,<br />

IR84649-275-3-2-B and IR84649-275-4-1-B appear<br />

promising under moderate sodic conditions<br />

(Fig. 31). However, derivatives IR 84649-21-20<br />

and IR 84645-281-10-B-B under salinity proved<br />

better due to their lesser magnitudes of salt<br />

stress susceptibility indices than other genotypes<br />

(Fig. 32).<br />

Screening SALTOL rice material in high sodic (pH .9.9),<br />

moderate sodic (pH 9.5), and normal microplots<br />

found tolerant under moderate sodic conditions.<br />

Under salinity, IR 84649-21-20 and under<br />

moderate sodic condition IR 84649-275-3-2-B<br />

proved better due to its lesser magnitudes of<br />

salt stress susceptibility index.<br />

The stress intensity was 0.32 and 0.53 under<br />

moderate sodic and high saline environments,<br />

respectively. Significant variability was<br />

recorded among all the genotypes tested under<br />

National Project on Establishment of National<br />

Rice Resource Database (DBT funded) (S.K.<br />

Sharma and S.L. Krishna Murthy)<br />

The project aims to characterize and assess<br />

redundancy in the already catalogued accessions<br />

of rice in India, generation of a ‘passport data’ for<br />

every unique accession by cataloguing already<br />

available as well as new information generated,<br />

evaluation of defined agronomic traits in the<br />

unique rice accessions and creation of the ‘core/<br />

mini-core germplasm’ for superior traits and<br />

its marker-based characterization. This project<br />

involves collaborative work between <strong>CSSRI</strong><br />

(mainly for morpho-agronomic evaluation<br />

Fig. 31: Grain yield performance of SALTOL lines under different salt stress environments<br />

Fig. 32: Stress susceptibility index (SSl) of the rice genotypes under salt stress environments<br />

60


<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

Crop improvement for salinity, alkalinity and waterlogging stresses<br />

and NBPGR, NRCPB & UDSC (for molecular<br />

characterization).<br />

A total of 3500 accessions (including 6 check<br />

varieties and 20 wild rice) were evaluated<br />

in augmented design under normal field<br />

conditions. Data were recorded for early plant<br />

vigour, coleoptile colour, basal leaf sheath<br />

colour, Leaf blade colour, leaf pubescence,<br />

leaf length, leaf width, days to 50% flowering,<br />

panicle exertion, stigma colour, apiculus colour,<br />

number of effective tillers, plant height, panicle<br />

length, panicle type, awing, days to maturity,<br />

seed coat colour, grain length width ratio,<br />

100 grain weight, hull colour (Husk colour),<br />

threshability, aroma, grain yield per plant,<br />

seedling height, flag leaf angle, ligules shape, leaf<br />

senescence, sterile lemma and auricle presence/<br />

absence. One hundred twenty five accessions<br />

did not flower and 809 accessions were late in<br />

maturity. The data of these accessions are being<br />

compiled.<br />

All India Wheat and Barley Workshop held<br />

at IARI, New Delhi in August, 2009 were<br />

released by the <strong>Central</strong> Sub-Committee on<br />

Crop Standards, Notification and Release of<br />

Varieties for Agricultural Crops in <strong>2010</strong>. Both<br />

these varieties having better yield potential<br />

and disease resistance are likely to spread<br />

over larger target areas besides providing<br />

good replacement for the earlier released<br />

varieties i.e. KRL 1-4 and KRL 19. The seed of<br />

these varieties has been supplied to farmers,<br />

extension agencies and seed producing<br />

agencies.<br />

Genetic Improvement of Wheat Germplasm for<br />

<strong>Salinity</strong>, Sodicity and Waterlogging Stresses<br />

(Neeraj Kulshreshtha and S. K. Sharma)<br />

Development and screening of salt tolerant<br />

genetic material<br />

Two salt tolerant varieties of <strong>CSSRI</strong>, Karnal,<br />

KRL 210 and KRL 213 identified during 48 th<br />

<strong>Salinity</strong>, sodicity and waterlogging affected fields Village<br />

Salimpur Trolley, Distt Sonepat, Haryana<br />

(a)<br />

(b)<br />

Performance of wheat varieties KRL 210 (a) and KRL 213 (b)<br />

61


Crop improvement for salinity, alkalinity and waterlogging stresses <strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

All India <strong>Salinity</strong>/Alkalinity Tolerance<br />

Varietal Trial (Neeraj Kulshreshtha, Y.P. Singh<br />

and G.G. Rao)<br />

During rabi 2009-10, All India Alkalinity/<br />

<strong>Salinity</strong> Tolerance Varietal Trial was proposed<br />

at 10 locations and conducted at 9 centers. The<br />

trial consisted of <strong>11</strong> test entries and four checks.<br />

The mean yield ranged from 1.94 t ha -1 (Bharuch)<br />

to 4.28 t ha -1 (Hisar). Among the final year<br />

entries, KRL 238 (3.35 t ha -1 ) and KRL 240 (2.88<br />

t ha -1 ) ranked 1 st and 2 nd , respectively. KRL 283<br />

(3.48 t ha -1 ) was the top most entry among the<br />

first year entries and was promoted to second<br />

year. Overall, KRL 283, KRL 238 and identified<br />

checks KRL 210 and KRL 213 were in the first<br />

non-significant group.<br />

Grain characteristics in most of the test entries<br />

were found acceptable. The days to heading of<br />

different genotypes ranged from 86 days (KRL<br />

19) to 98 days (KRL 249) whereas plant height<br />

ranged from 77 cm (KRL 240) to <strong>11</strong>4 cm (Kharchia<br />

65(C)). Thousand grain weight of the varieties<br />

ranged from 31 g (WH 1052 and KRL 240) to 37 g<br />

(KRL 273, WH 1095 and KRL 210).<br />

<strong>Salinity</strong>/Alkalinity Tolerance Screening<br />

Nursery (Neeraj Kulshreshtha, Y. P. Singh and<br />

G. G. Rao)<br />

During 2009-10, salinity/alkalinity tolerance<br />

screening nursery was implemented at 9<br />

locations. The nursery consisted of 60 entries and<br />

five checks: Kharchia 65, HD 4530, KRL 19, KRL<br />

3-4 and PDW 233 with 6 blocks in augmented<br />

design. Each block comprised of 10 test entries<br />

and 5 checks. Superior lines were identified<br />

on the basis of the analysis of grain yield and<br />

comparison with the pooled value (repeated 6<br />

times at one center) of the checks. The genotypes<br />

that performed better in comparison to Kharchia<br />

65 among bread wheat and the best check among<br />

durum wheat are given in Table 37.<br />

Development of new F 1<br />

crosses<br />

Fifty one crosses and back crosses were<br />

attempted to widen the genetic variability for<br />

salt tolerance and waterlogging tolerance and to<br />

incorporate salt tolerance in the widely adapted<br />

and disease resistant wheat lines/varieties,<br />

namely Kharchia 65, KRL 3-4, KRL 99, KRL 210,<br />

Table 37 : Mean performance of the entries in<br />

salinity/alkalinity tolerance screening<br />

nursery<br />

Sr.<br />

No.<br />

Entry<br />

Triticum aestivum<br />

Yield<br />

(g/plot)<br />

Height<br />

(cm)<br />

1 KRL 304 400 85 3<br />

2 KRL 303 398 76 4<br />

3 KRL 315 384 82 3<br />

4 KRL 324 383 82 4<br />

5 KRL 301 376 83 3<br />

6 KRL 302 376 86 3<br />

7 WH 1083 372 85 3<br />

8 WH 1097 370 84 3<br />

9 KRL 323 368 81 3<br />

10 KRL 309 367 81 3<br />

<strong>11</strong> KRL 322 367 84 3<br />

12 KRL 305 366 87 3<br />

13 KRL 300 364 79 4<br />

14 KRL 312 362 83 3<br />

15 KRL 306 358 88 3<br />

16 LBP 2009-24 356 78 4<br />

17 KRL 299 355 84 3<br />

18 KRL 307 354 81 4<br />

19 RAJ 42<strong>11</strong> 347 79 3<br />

20 NW 5029 346 80 3<br />

21 RWP 2009-12 345 80 4<br />

22 KRL 316 345 80 3<br />

Growth<br />

Vigour<br />

Triticum durum<br />

1 KRL 294 300 71 4<br />

2 KRL 296 296 69 3<br />

3 KRL 297 232 73 4<br />

Checks<br />

1 Kharchia 65 330 103 3<br />

2 HD 4530 171 68 4<br />

3 KRL 19 277 78 3<br />

4 KRL 3-4 363 101 3<br />

5 PDW 233 230 76 4<br />

Mean 313 81 3<br />

Max 400 100 4<br />

Min 194 69 2<br />

KRL 213, KRL 283, KRL 240, KRL 249, KRL 250,<br />

KRL 273, KRL 278, KRL 284, KRS 9382, KRS<br />

9337, PBW 486, PBW 343, PBW 589, PBW 583,<br />

PBW 550, PBW 525, PBW 550, FLW 2, FLW 8,<br />

FLW 4, HS 471, HD 2964, and HW 2045.<br />

62


<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

Crop improvement for salinity, alkalinity and waterlogging stresses<br />

Screening of segregating and advanced<br />

generation crosses<br />

Forty one F 2<br />

and about three hundred advanced<br />

generation lines from the crosses of high yielding<br />

varieties (PBW 343, WH 542, HD2329, Inqlab,<br />

CPAN 3004, DBW 18, and HD 2009), disease<br />

resistant genetic stocks (FLW 2, FLW 3, FLW 4,<br />

FLW 5, HP 1872, HS 460, HS 472, HS 484, HW<br />

2045, HPW 17, HUW 234, PBW 509, PBW 525,<br />

PBW 524, VL 852, VL 867), salt tolerant varieties<br />

(KRL 99, KRL19, KRL 3-4, KRL 35, KRL 19, KRS<br />

607, KRL 1-4, KRS 622, KRL <strong>11</strong>9, KRL 238 and<br />

Kharchia 65) and imported genotypes (Ducula<br />

4, Maringa, Spear, Perenjori, BT Schomburgk<br />

and BWMA 4) were evaluated and selected for<br />

their suitability under different salt stresses.<br />

Anticipatory breeding for creating resistance<br />

against new virulence Ug 99 of stem rust<br />

To incorporate resistance to race Ug 99 in salt<br />

tolerant cultivates in wheat, initiatives were<br />

taken during crop seasons 2005-06, 2006-07, 2007-<br />

08 and 2008-09 as per latest ICAR guidelines.<br />

The crosses made in 2005-06 were advanced<br />

using summer nursery facility at Dalang<br />

Maidan during summer 2006 and were further<br />

advanced along with selection for salt tolerance<br />

in 2006-07. The selected progenies were sent to<br />

Dalang Maidan for generation advancement.<br />

In addition, crosses were made during 2009-10<br />

rabi season using parents having resistance to<br />

race Ug 99. The timely strategy adopted in this<br />

regard will lead to development of salt tolerant<br />

and Ug 99 resistant cultivars in due course of<br />

time.<br />

Germplasm collection and maintenance<br />

Nearly 600 entries of working germplasm based<br />

on plant type, salt tolerance and productivity<br />

were maintained besides 300 doubled haploid<br />

lines of two different crosses (Ducula4/*2<br />

Brookton & HD2329/Camm) for further use in<br />

the breeding programme.<br />

Breeder and nucleus seed production<br />

Breeder seed of <strong>CSSRI</strong> varieties KRL 19 (2.5 t),<br />

KRL 210 (0.5 t) and KRL 213 (0.5 t) was produced<br />

at <strong>CSSRI</strong> Karnal farm for distribution to various<br />

seed producing agencies, farm section and<br />

farmers. Nucleus seed of 40 lines (KRL entries)<br />

and of the released varieties KRL 1-4, KRL19,<br />

KRL 210 and KRL 213 was produced.<br />

Evaluation of wheat varieties for salt stress in<br />

microplots<br />

Twenty three wheat varieties were evaluated<br />

under different levels of salt stress i.e. normal<br />

(control), saline (EC e<br />

5.9 dS m -1 ) and sodic (pH 2<br />

9.3) in the microplots with three replications.<br />

The genotypes KRL 3-4, KRL 99 and Kharchia<br />

65 were found to be highly tolerant genotypes,<br />

whereas DW1, HD 2285, HD 4530, HD 2851,<br />

HS 460, DW 3 and HD 2009 were the sensitive<br />

genotypes. The genotypes KRL 213, KRL 238,<br />

KRL 250, KRL 251, KRL 210, KRL <strong>11</strong>9, KRL 240,<br />

KRL 19 and KRL 229 were found to be medium<br />

tolerant.<br />

Incorporation of Salt Tolerance through<br />

Induced Mutagenesis (Neeraj Kulshreshtha,<br />

P.C. Sharma and R.K. Gautam)<br />

Advancement of mutagen treated genotypes<br />

M3 families of the genotypes Kharchia 65, KRL<br />

99, FLW 2, FLW 5, PBW 524, HD 2189 and<br />

HD 2329/Camm treated with kR 20 and kR<br />

30 gamma rays dose at IARI, New Delhi were<br />

advanced to M4 stage. The M4 families were<br />

screened under stress conditions. A number<br />

of tolerant genotypes were selected for further<br />

evaluation under stress.<br />

Evaluation of M6 families<br />

A number of tolerant as well as sensitive M6<br />

families of the genotypes Kharchia 65, KRL 3-4,<br />

KRL 35, KRL 99, PBW 343, PBW 498, PBW 502<br />

and PBW 509 at gamma rays irradiation dose<br />

of kR 20 and KRL 99 and UP 2338 at dose kR<br />

30 were grown under salt stress conditions. A<br />

number of tolerant and sensitive genotypes<br />

from each family were selected on the basis<br />

of yield and yield contributing traits under<br />

stress, awn characters, maturity, grain colour,<br />

morphological appearances and resistance to<br />

brown and yellow rusts. A few tolerant as well as<br />

early genotypes could be selected from KRL 99,<br />

PBW 343 and PBW 509 families. The variation in<br />

relative tolerance of genotypes within mutagenic<br />

family provides initial indication that mutation<br />

can be used as a tool to improve salt tolerance<br />

trait in wheat.<br />

63


Crop improvement for salinity, alkalinity and waterlogging stresses <strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

Ionic analysis of M5 families<br />

high K concentration and low Na concentration<br />

The tolerant and sensitive mutant families<br />

were also selected among the mutant families of<br />

PBW 498, PBW 509, PBW 343, KRL 99 (Fig. 33)<br />

were screened further for tolerant and sensitive<br />

and KRL 35. In addition, a number of tolerant<br />

genotypes. The range of leaf Na concentration<br />

mutants showing earliness were also selected<br />

among mutants in sodic soil was 0.13 mmol gm -1<br />

among the families of PBW 343, PBW 509 and<br />

to 0.27 mmol gm -1 , whereas the range of leaf K<br />

KRL 3-4. This variability will be studied further<br />

concentration was 0.67 mmol gm -1 to 0.92 mmol<br />

with respect to the genetic studies and its<br />

gm -1 . A number of salt tolerant mutants with<br />

relevance in breeding programme.<br />

PBW 498<br />

PBW 509<br />

PBW 343<br />

KRL 99<br />

Fig. 33: Salt tolerant mutants selected for PBW 498, PBW 509, PBW 343 and KRL 99<br />

Multilocation Evaluation of Breadwheat<br />

Germplasm (Neeraj Kulshreshtha)<br />

One thousand bread wheat germplasm lines<br />

were screened under sodic conditions (pH 9.1).<br />

A lot of genetic variability was observed among<br />

germplasm lines as evident from range and<br />

variance shown for yield attributes . The range<br />

of grain yield plot -1 was from 8-3<strong>11</strong>g with mean<br />

of <strong>11</strong>3g and variance of 2098. Days to heading<br />

ranged from 79 - 131 days with mean 100 and<br />

variance 55. Most of the lines were tall as evident<br />

from plant height mean of <strong>11</strong>7 cm; however,<br />

64


<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

Crop improvement for salinity, alkalinity and waterlogging stresses<br />

it ranged from 70-160 cm. There was a lot of<br />

variability with respect to 1000 grain weight<br />

as it ranged from <strong>11</strong> to 50 g with mean 31 and<br />

variance 32. It showed that there is a lot of scope<br />

to improve grain weight under stress. Variability<br />

shown for different yield attributes also suggest<br />

that there is a great scope of improving different<br />

yield attributes simultaneously to arrive at an<br />

ideal plant type for stress tolerance and high<br />

yield. Twenty five genotypes as shown in Table<br />

38 were found to yield better than Kharchia 65,<br />

however, these genotypes will be studied further<br />

for their potential to become a good source of<br />

salt tolerance.<br />

Table 38 : Sodicity tolerant genotypes selected on the basis of grain yield/plot<br />

S.N. Genotype/IC No. Grain yield<br />

(g/0.45m 2 )<br />

Days to<br />

heading<br />

Plant height (cm)<br />

1000 grain<br />

weight (g)<br />

1 79093 3<strong>11</strong> 90 107 37<br />

2 47349 308 84 108 38<br />

3 104622 268 92 96 29<br />

4 533742 265 92 90 37<br />

5 82209 264 94 <strong>11</strong>5 37<br />

6 107946 241 94 130 29<br />

7 138901 241 91 120 37<br />

8 82216 230 95 133 38<br />

9 532493 229 101 136 35<br />

10 145948 226 88 130 36<br />

<strong>11</strong> 55701 226 140 103 40<br />

12 532343 224 142 139 33<br />

13 534850 224 144 136 37<br />

14 532773 223 146 152 38<br />

15 104581 223 143 133 38<br />

16 532495 221 142 140 43<br />

17 532075 220 143 128 33<br />

18 82453 219 143 134 38<br />

19 532149 218 139 135 28<br />

20 533755 217 153 100 39<br />

21 532743 217 144 132 36<br />

22 104582 217 140 130 39<br />

23 78722 216 144 105 21<br />

24 78802 215 146 105 36<br />

25 534688 215 153 133 31<br />

C1 Kharchia 65 214 101 135 32<br />

C2 HD 4530 43 103 86 29<br />

C3 KRL 19 107 98 90 31<br />

C4 KRL 3-4 243 96 124 35<br />

Mean <strong>11</strong>3 100 <strong>11</strong>7 31<br />

Variance 2098 55 224 32<br />

Range 8-3<strong>11</strong> 79-131 70-160 <strong>11</strong>–50<br />

C1, C2, C3 and C4 means check varieties<br />

65


Crop improvement for salinity, alkalinity and waterlogging stresses <strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

Wheat Improvement for Waterlogging, <strong>Salinity</strong><br />

and Element Toxicities in Australia and India<br />

(Neeraj Kulshreshtha, S.K. Sharma and N.P.S.<br />

Yaduvanshi)<br />

Waterlogging tolerance and ICP/microelement<br />

analyses of key Indian and Australian wheat<br />

varieties<br />

The objective of this study is to demonstrate the<br />

genetic diversity for waterlogging tolerance in<br />

sodic soil among Indian and Australian wheat<br />

varieties. A number of salt tolerant and sensitive<br />

wheat varieties (KRL 3-4, KRL 99, Kharchia 65,<br />

KRL19, KRL 210, NW 1014, Brookton, Ducula<br />

4, DBW 17, HD 2851 and HD2009) were grown<br />

in the sodic microplots, where salt stress levels<br />

were much uniform relative to field conditions<br />

in three replications with 1 m row length of<br />

each plot. One of the set was waterlogged for 15<br />

days after 22 days of sowing while in the other<br />

set, the irrigation water was drained. Similarly,<br />

two sets of the same genotypes were sown<br />

in normal microplots. Waterlogging reduced<br />

the grain yield in both the soils. However, the<br />

percent reduction of many varieties in sodic soils<br />

was more in comparison to normal soil except<br />

KRL 99. In normal soil, the maximum reduction<br />

due to waterlogging was observed in Brookton<br />

followed by HD 2851 and HD 2009. The least<br />

reduction was observed for NW 1014 followed<br />

by KRL 99 and DBW 17. In sodic soils (pH 9.2),<br />

The maximum reduction (53%) was observed for<br />

HD 2851 followed by Ducula 4, Brookton and<br />

HD 2009. The minimum reduction was observed<br />

for KRL 99 followed by KRL 3-4 and KRL 210.<br />

In waterlogged sodic soils, KRL 3-4 was the best<br />

performing followed by KRL 99 and KRL 210. In<br />

case of biomass/plot, the genotypes with per se<br />

performance better than the mean as well as least<br />

reduction under waterlogging in sodic soil were<br />

KRL 3-4, Kharchia 65, KRL 99, KRL 210, KRL 19<br />

and NW 1014. Similarly, the genotypes with least<br />

reduction under waterlogging in normal soil<br />

were DBW 17, NW 1014 Ducula 4 and HD 2009.<br />

Evaluation of varieties for waterlogging<br />

tolerance<br />

The objective of this study is to validate<br />

waterlogging tolerance of wheat varieties in<br />

sodic soils (pH 9.1). A number of salt tolerant<br />

and sensitive wheat varieties (KRL 3-4, KRL<br />

99, Kharchia 65, KRL19, KRL 210, NW 1014,<br />

Brookton, Ducula 4, DBW 17, HD 2851 and<br />

HD2009) were grown in the sodic fields (pH<br />

9.1) with three replications (Table 39). One<br />

of the set was waterlogged for 15 days after<br />

22 days of sowing while in the other set, the<br />

irrigation water was drained. The phenotypic<br />

performance of KRL 3-4, KRL 99, KRL 210 and<br />

Kharchia 65 was better than other genotypes<br />

under waterlogging. Waterlogging reduced the<br />

grain yield by 18 per cent in sodic soils. KRL 3-4<br />

followed by Kharchia 65 and KRL 99 were the top<br />

performers under waterlogging. With respect<br />

to yield reduction, maximum reduction in grain<br />

yield was observed for HD 2851 followed by HD<br />

2009 and DBW 17. Waterlogging also reduced<br />

the plant height of different genotypes with<br />

maximum reduction in HD 2851 (6%) followed<br />

by DBW 17 and Brookton. There was 7 per cent<br />

reduction in tillers/plot under waterlogging in<br />

sodic soils with maximum reduction in Ducula<br />

4 followed by Brookton and HD 2851.<br />

Table 39 : Effect of waterlogging on grain yield (g)<br />

in sodic soils (pH 9.1)<br />

Genotype<br />

Drained WL Reduction<br />

Mean SE Mean SE<br />

(% )<br />

BROOKTON <strong>11</strong>5 2.0 98 3.0 14<br />

DBW 17 130 3.9 99 8.6 24<br />

DUCULA 4 122 5.5 97 4.4 21<br />

HD 2009 124 3.0 79 3.8 36<br />

HD 2851 127 4.5 63 1.7 50<br />

Kh. 65 154 5.8 142 4.8 8<br />

KRL 19 144 2.4 126 4.6 13<br />

KRL 210 154 8.6 138 2.3 <strong>11</strong><br />

KRL 3-4 177 5.9 170 3.0 4<br />

KRL 99 164 3.9 141 4.2 14<br />

NW 1014 138 6.4 120 2.7 13<br />

Mean 140.8 <strong>11</strong>5.8 18<br />

Min <strong>11</strong>4.9 63.2<br />

Max 177.0 170.4<br />

66


<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

Crop improvement for salinity, alkalinity and waterlogging stresses<br />

Single Seed Descent (SSD) approach to increase<br />

waterlogging tolerance using waterlogging<br />

tolerant x disease resistant donors grown in<br />

sodic soils<br />

This is the main breeding program at <strong>CSSRI</strong>,<br />

where suitable parental material is crossed<br />

and selected cross is chosen for further work<br />

according to the SSD schedule. This cross will<br />

be used and developed throughout the project<br />

duration. F 2<br />

population of the three crosses<br />

(PBW 525/KRL 99, KRL 99/FLW 8//PBW 550,<br />

FLW 4/KRL 99//FLW 4) were sown in the sodic<br />

field (pH 9.1) along with parents. The selection<br />

of the cross taken for experimentation was<br />

decided by (i) KRL 99 (a salt and waterlogging<br />

tolerant amber grained genotype with good<br />

plant type) as one of the parent crossed with<br />

one or two disease resistant/high yielding lines<br />

and (ii) and availability of sufficient F 2<br />

seed.<br />

The population was waterlogged for 15 days<br />

after 22 days of sowing. Suitable population<br />

out of these three will be selected for salt and<br />

waterlogging tolerance, disease resistance and<br />

other agronomical traits and will be advanced as<br />

per the protocol. The population was screened<br />

for salt and waterlogging tolerance and the<br />

rust reaction. Out of the three populations, the<br />

performance of PBW 525/KRL 99 was the best<br />

with respect to phenotypic performance under<br />

waterlogging and resistance to rusts. This was<br />

followed by FLW 4/KRL 99//FLW 4. The<br />

population KRL 99/FLW 8//PBW 550 was the<br />

least performing. The population of PBW 525/<br />

KRL 99 will be advanced as per the protocol.<br />

Bi-plot/cluster analyses of Indian and<br />

Australian wheat varieties/germplasm lines<br />

grown in waterlogged sodic soil.<br />

The bi-plot analysis/cluster analysis was carried<br />

out to identify parental material for future<br />

programmes under different conditions. This<br />

study will be useful in evaluation of genetic<br />

variability in Indian/Australian material and<br />

also help in identifying contrasting parents for<br />

different types of soil / production conditions of<br />

wheat in India. In this experiment, one hundred<br />

promising genotypes/released varieties of wheat<br />

were pooled from <strong>CSSRI</strong>, Karnal (material for<br />

salinity tolerance/intolerance), DWR, Karnal<br />

(material for yield attributes, rusts, leaf blight and<br />

Karnal bunt) and NDUA&T, Faizabad (material<br />

for waterlogging conditions and element efficient,<br />

if any) and are being evaluated in waterlogged as<br />

well as drained sodic soils (pH 9.1) in augmented<br />

design with 2 blocks (each block comprised of 8<br />

checks and 50 entries). The checks were KRL 3-4,<br />

KRL 19, HD 2009, Kharchia 65, DBW 17, PBW<br />

550, PBW 343 and DBW 14. A lot of variability<br />

was observed among the checks and test<br />

varieties with respect to waterlogging tolerance<br />

and per se performance under waterlogging.<br />

Among the check varieties, DBW 14 showed<br />

maximum reduction in grain yield (75 %) under<br />

waterlogging followed by PBW 550 and HD<br />

2009. Kharchia 65 reported minimum reduction<br />

followed by KRL 3-4 and KRL 19. The ranking<br />

of varieties differed with respect to grain yield<br />

under both the environments. This is evident<br />

from the list of top ten (Table 40) and bottom ten<br />

(Table 41) yielders in drained as well as sodic<br />

soils.<br />

Physiology in waterlogging tolerance<br />

The main aim of this project was to evaluate<br />

waterlogging tolerance and microelement<br />

analyses of wheat (~10 varieties) grown in pots<br />

Table 40 : Top ten genotypes in the drained and<br />

waterlogged sodic soils from biplot,<br />

cluster analysis experiment with respect<br />

to grain yield plot -1<br />

S.N. Drained Waterlogged<br />

1 KRL 259 KRL 259<br />

2 NW-4035 KRL 240<br />

3 KRL 210 KRL 105<br />

4 KRL 240 KRL 268<br />

5 NW-4081 HD 3028<br />

6 KRL 283 KRL 238<br />

7 NW-4018 KRL 283<br />

8 KRL 229 HD 2985<br />

9 GUTHA KRL 99<br />

10 KRL 1-4 KRL 35<br />

67


Crop improvement for salinity, alkalinity and waterlogging stresses <strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

Table 41 :<br />

Bottom ten genotypes in the drained<br />

and waterlogged sodic soils from<br />

biplot, cluster analysis experiment<br />

with respect to grain yield plot -1<br />

S.N. Drained Waterlogged<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

10<br />

NW-2036 PBW 642<br />

HD 2997 PBW 636<br />

CAMM PBW 639<br />

PBW 642 PBW 635<br />

SCHOMBURGK<br />

NWL-7-4<br />

CHIRYA 7 CHIRYA 7<br />

CHARA PBW 634<br />

PBW 635<br />

DBW 50<br />

NW-3069<br />

NWL-9-22<br />

AMERY HI 1563<br />

in reclaimed (pH 8.2) and sodic soils (pH 9.3).<br />

These data were also compared to waterlogging<br />

tolerance of same varieties in the field or<br />

microplots to enable us to validate the use of pots<br />

in characterising germplasm. All the three stress<br />

treatments ((1) normal drained (N), (2) Normal<br />

+ WL (N+WL), (3) Sodic (S) and (4) Sodic + WL<br />

(S+WL)) caused significant reduction in the grain<br />

yield of all the varieties of wheat over control<br />

with sodicity + WL causing the maximum<br />

reduction. Significant genotypic variation was<br />

observed for grain yield and biomass under the<br />

stress treatments and Brookton, HD 2009, HD<br />

2851 and Ducula 4 were the poorest performers<br />

on the overall mean basis.<br />

Maximum deleterious effects on grain yield were<br />

observed under sodicity (67% reduction over<br />

control) followed by WL superimposed over<br />

sodicity (60.8% reduction), and WL in neutral pH<br />

(39.7% reduction), whereas the relative per cent<br />

reductions for biomass for the same treatments<br />

were 67.2, 53.0 and 41.9, respectively. Plant<br />

biomass and grain yield were reduced similarly<br />

by sodicity resulting in the lowest harvest<br />

index. Number of grains was reduced by all the<br />

three stress treatments with sodicity causing the<br />

maximum detrimental effects. 100 grain weight<br />

was reduced with maximum reduction observed<br />

under sodicity+WL followed by sodicity and<br />

waterlogging in neutral pH (7.8). Sodicity+ WL<br />

also had the most detrimental effects on the<br />

plant height, total number of tillers, productive<br />

tillers and redox potential. KRL 3-4 and Kharchia<br />

65 produced maximum biomass and grain<br />

yield. Removal of water from the normal and<br />

sodic soils led to recovery, which was quicker<br />

in neutral soil, while it took a longer time in<br />

sodic soils. Therefore, sodic soils tend to suffer<br />

longer from the effects of waterlogging and the<br />

accompanying lower redox potentials.<br />

Plants were sampled and separated into top<br />

three leaves, remaining leaves, stem and<br />

earheads for elemental analysis. Top three<br />

leaves including the flag leaf were analysed for<br />

all the elements by ICP. Na concentration was<br />

found to be higher in the upper three leaves<br />

from sodic and sodic and WL treatment which<br />

were at par. K concentration were observed to<br />

be highest in sodic +WL treatment and were<br />

in the order of S+WL > Sodic > N+WL > N. Ca<br />

concentrations showed a marginal decline in<br />

sodic and sodic +WL treatments as compared<br />

to neutral pH and neutral pH +WL treatments,<br />

Fig. 34 : Validation of results on grain yield (GY) of wheat between pots and microplots under waterlogged sodic (a) and<br />

drained sodic (b) conditions<br />

68


<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

Crop improvement for salinity, alkalinity and waterlogging stresses<br />

while the three stress treatments did not have<br />

any effect on Mg concentrations. Comparison<br />

of the grain yield data of the similar set of<br />

ten genotypes from pots to the microplots<br />

sodic conditions showed good correlations<br />

(Fig. 34).<br />

The genotypes KRL 3-4, KRL 99 and Kharchia 65<br />

showed good waterlogging tolerance in different<br />

experiments. Among Indian and Australian<br />

genotypes, a lot of variability was observed with<br />

respect to waterlogging tolerance in sodic soils.<br />

Out of the three populations studied in sodic<br />

soils, the performance of PBW 525/KRL 99 was<br />

the best with respect to phenotypic performance<br />

under waterlogging and resistance to rusts.<br />

Improvement of Salt Tolerance in Wheat using<br />

Molecular Approach (Neeraj Kulshreshtha, P.C<br />

Sharma, S. K Sharma)<br />

One hundred twenty fixed Recombinant<br />

Inbred Lines (RILs) of the cross Kharchia 65<br />

(Salt tolerant) x HD 2009 (Salt sensitive) were<br />

screened and evaluated for phenotyping in<br />

the <strong>CSSRI</strong> sodic microplots at pH 2<br />

9.1 in an<br />

augmented design with four checks. Kharchia<br />

65 performed best among the checks followed<br />

by KRL 19, HD 2009 and HD 2851 with respect<br />

to grain yield plant -1 . The RILs displayed a lot<br />

of variability among inbred lines with respect<br />

to grain yield, sodium and potassium uptake.<br />

The grain yield plant -1 among the RILs ranged<br />

from 8.45g to 0.65g, mean of 3.60, whereas the<br />

K/Na ratio among the RILs ranged from 2.16 to<br />

0.13 with a mean of 0.91 (Table 42 a). The top<br />

tolerant 10 RIL, top 10 sensitive, top 10 high K/<br />

Table 42 a : Performance of checks and RILs<br />

(Overall)<br />

Checks<br />

Grain yield<br />

plant -1 (g)<br />

Tolerance<br />

index<br />

K/Na<br />

Kharchia 65 6.06 0.94 1.14<br />

HD 2009 2.24 0.37 0.73<br />

KRL 19 3.54 0.58 0.96<br />

HD 2851 2.16 0.33 0.82<br />

RILs<br />

Mean 3.60 0.68 0.91<br />

SD 1.52 0.16 0.36<br />

Na and top 10 low K/Na are given in table 42 b,<br />

c, d and e.<br />

Table 42 b : Performance of tolerant RILs (Top 10)<br />

Genotypes<br />

Grain yield<br />

plant -1 (g)<br />

Tolerance<br />

index<br />

MP 1-69 8.45 0.95<br />

MP 1-57 7.45 0.88<br />

MP 1-<strong>11</strong>9 6.75 0.76<br />

MP 1-94 6.63 0.88<br />

MP 1-90 6.43 0.90<br />

MP 1-28 6.18 0.83<br />

MP 1-81 6.03 0.86<br />

MP 1-73 6.03 0.83<br />

MP 1-53 5.95 0.83<br />

MP 1-<strong>11</strong>5 5.85 0.72<br />

Table 42 c : Performance of sensitive RILs (Top 10)<br />

Genotypes<br />

Grain yield<br />

plant -1 (g)<br />

Tolerance<br />

index<br />

MP 1-<strong>11</strong>0 0.65 0.24<br />

MP 1-41 0.68 0.25<br />

MP 1-32 0.78 0.34<br />

MP 1-38 0.88 0.42<br />

MP 1-48 1.08 0.47<br />

MP 1-18 1.20 0.41<br />

MP 1-17 1.20 0.35<br />

MP 1-95 1.33 0.60<br />

MP 1-31 1.38 0.40<br />

MP 1-6 1.40 0.40<br />

Table 42 d : Performance of RILs with high K/Na<br />

(Overall)<br />

Genotypes<br />

Grain yield<br />

plant -1 (g)<br />

Tolerance<br />

index<br />

K/Na<br />

MP 1-26 3.8 0.67 2.16<br />

MP 1-4 3.5 0.69 1.90<br />

MP 1-8 2.1 0.81 1.72<br />

MP 1-<strong>11</strong>3 2.4 0.94 1.72<br />

MP 1-24 2.3 0.55 1.72<br />

MP 1-54 2.9 0.66 1.68<br />

MP 1-49 4.4 0.57 1.62<br />

MP 1-106 2.0 0.67 1.57<br />

MP 1-9 4.7 0.67 1.54<br />

MP 1-76 4.7 0.80 1.51<br />

69


Crop improvement for salinity, alkalinity and waterlogging stresses <strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

Table 42 e : Performance of RILs with low K/Na<br />

(Overall)<br />

Genotypes<br />

Grain yield<br />

plant -1 (g)<br />

Tolerance<br />

index<br />

K/Na<br />

MP 1-105 4.1 0.83 0.13<br />

MP 1-35 2.8 0.45 0.20<br />

MP 1-71 3.8 0.71 0.41<br />

MP 1-97 1.7 0.40 0.42<br />

MP 1-3 1.8 0.44 0.44<br />

MP 1-64 3.3 0.69 0.45<br />

MP 1-96 2.1 0.39 0.45<br />

MP 1-<strong>11</strong>0 0.7 0.24 0.47<br />

MP 1-90 6.4 0.90 0.47<br />

MP 1-91 5.2 0.99 0.48<br />

Search for Wheat Materials Tolerant to Sodicity<br />

and Zinc Deficiency Stresses (Ali Qadar and<br />

Neeraj Kulshreshtha)<br />

Total zinc (Zn) in soil often ranges from 40-80<br />

ppm, but DTPA extractable zinc (Zn) is often<br />

low in sodic soils and Zn is invariably applied<br />

to meet the crop requirement. This is practiced<br />

irrespective of the variety under cultivation in<br />

sodic soils. There may be differences in potential<br />

to mine Zn in sodic soils among wheat genotypes.<br />

Twenty two genotypes of wheat comprising<br />

tetraploid and hexaploid materials were sown<br />

on 17-<strong>11</strong>-2009 in 10 kg capacity pots filled with<br />

soil of pH 2<br />

9.0 with and without added Zn. Zinc<br />

was added @ 10 kg ha -1 using ZnSO 4<br />

7H 2<br />

O.<br />

DTPA extractable Zn in the soil was 1.1 ppm,<br />

whereas it was 0.8 ppm in control (without Zn).<br />

Phosphorus was not applied, as it is known to<br />

influence the availability and utilization of Zn<br />

within the plants. Fourteen seeds were sown<br />

in each pot and each treatment was replicated<br />

four times. There was no effect on the number<br />

of emerged seedlings in response to applied Zn.<br />

However, some of the materials (KRL 3-4, NW-<br />

1014) showed chlorotic symptoms on the leaves<br />

after about 18-20 days after emergence of the<br />

seedlings followed by death of the leaves . These<br />

symptoms were similar in appearance to those<br />

reported in the literature under Zn deficiency.<br />

Zn concentration in the seed of KRL 3-4 was<br />

43.3 ppm (analysed before sowing). Many other<br />

materials like KRL 19, which had even less Zn<br />

(37.2 ppm) did not show such symptoms. This<br />

problem in KRL 3-4 was also observed during<br />

early stage of seedling growth in current study<br />

(<strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong>), which is under progress. However,<br />

at later stages, these types of symptoms were<br />

not observed on new leaves. Few genotypes did<br />

show P deficiency symptoms especially at the<br />

end of December, 2009 and beginning of January,<br />

<strong>2010</strong> when pot soil temperature was hovering<br />

around 6-7 ºC. Overall plant growth was affected<br />

because of sodicity, Zn and P deficiencies.<br />

Several materials including Kharchia-65, KRL<br />

3-4, PBW 343, KRL 210, DBW 17 responded to<br />

Zn fertilization in terms of shoot dry weight and<br />

grain yield (Table 43), whereas KRL 2-3. NW<br />

1014, Brookton and KRL 19 did not respond to<br />

added Zn indicating their potential to tolerate<br />

Zn deficiency stress. Tetraploid varieties known<br />

to be sensitive to sodicity and Zn deficiency<br />

stress showed overall poor growth, however<br />

KRL 297 did not respond to added Zn.<br />

Table 43 : Grain yield (g pot -1 ) of wheat genotypes without (0.8ppm) and with added Zn (1.1 ppm) in sodic<br />

soil<br />

Genotype pH 2<br />

9.0 Genotype pH 2<br />

9.0<br />

-Zn +Zn -Zn +Zn<br />

Kharchia 65 0.273 ± 0.025 1.687 ± 0.361 HD 2009 1.261 ± 0.072 2.107 ± 0.604<br />

KRL 19 1.700 ± 0.387 1.923 ± 0.353 DBW 17 1.182 ± 0.201 2.387 ± 0.272<br />

KRL 210 1.493 ± 0.313 2.297 ± 0.534 HD 2285 1.759 ± 0.440 2.074 ± 0.486<br />

KRL 3-4 1.613 ± 0.342 2.268 ± 0.240 HD 2851 1.499 ± 0.<strong>11</strong>9 3.245 ± 0.275<br />

NW 1014 2.479 ± 0.404 2.532 ± 0.353 Brookton 2.313 ± 0.425 2.210± 0.156<br />

PBW 343 0.910 ± 0.036 2.859 ± 0.522 KRL 297* 1.333 ± 0.355 1.249 ± 0.377<br />

DW 1 1.316 ± 0.375 3.314 ± 0.480 HD 4530* 0.401 ± 0.147 0.936 ± 0.124<br />

± Sample standard deviation * Tetraploid wheat genotypes<br />

70


<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

Crop improvement for salinity, alkalinity and waterlogging stresses<br />

Evaluation of advanced breeding lines in semiarid<br />

saline soils at Hisar<br />

Eighty four breeding lines including five checks<br />

(CS 52, CS 54, CS 56, Kranti and Varuna) were<br />

evaluated for seed yield and other characters in<br />

screening trials in semi -arid saline soils at Bir<br />

forest farm, Hisar. Seed yield ranged from (0.75<br />

to 2.85 t ha -1 ). Sixteen lines gave higher yield<br />

over the best check Varuna (1.91 t ha -1 ) with<br />

2100-3-6 (2.85 t ha -1 ) followed by 700-2-1-6 (2.36<br />

t ha -1 ) recording maximum yield. Twelve lines<br />

recorded more than 2.00 t ha -1 yield.<br />

Comparative growth of wheat genotypes after a month of<br />

sowing<br />

Several materials including Kharchia-65, KRL<br />

3-4, PBW 343, KRL 210, DBW 17 responded to<br />

Zn fertilization. NW 1014, Brookton, KRL 19<br />

and KRL 297 (tetraploid) showed potential to<br />

tolerate Zn deficiency stress under soil pH 2<br />

9.0<br />

Development of Salt Tolerant High Yielding<br />

Genotypes of Indian Mustard (Brassica juncea)<br />

(P.C. Sharma and S.L. Krishna Murthy)<br />

Evaluation of advanced breeding lines (IVT<br />

and AVT) in semi–reclaimed alkali soils<br />

Seventy three genotypes including five checks<br />

(CS 52, CS 54, CS 56, Kranti and Varuna) were<br />

evaluated in IVT for seed yield and other<br />

characters in reclaimed alkali soils at <strong>CSSRI</strong>,<br />

Karnal. Seed yield ranged from 0.93 to 2.79 t ha -1 .<br />

Thirty seven lines out yielded the best checks<br />

Kranti and Varuna with 13000-2-2-2-1-2 (2.79 t<br />

ha -1 ) and 13000-3-1-1-4-1 (2.56 t ha -1 ) recording<br />

the maximum yield.<br />

In AVT, eighty four breeding lines along with<br />

five checks (CS52, CS54, CS56, Kranti and<br />

Varuna) were evaluated for seed yield and<br />

other characters in reclaimed alkali soils. Seed<br />

yield varied from (1.41 to 2.75 t ha -1 ). Out of<br />

these, eight lines recorded significantly higher<br />

yield over the best check Kranti. Forty two lines<br />

out yielded the check Varuna with CS 6<strong>11</strong>-1-6-1<br />

(2.75 t ha -1 ) followed by CS 15000-1-2-2-2-2 (2.49<br />

t ha -1 ). Twelve lines yielded more than 2.00 t<br />

ha -1 .<br />

Evaluation of promising salt tolerant strains of<br />

Indian mustard (Brassica juncea) in All India<br />

Coordinated Trial on Rapeseed Mustard<br />

Performance of mustard strains in IVT saline/<br />

alkaline conditions screening nursery<br />

Twelve genotypes were evaluated under<br />

salinity stress in IVT under saline conditions<br />

(EC e<br />

~10 dS m -1 ) at experimental farm, Hisar and<br />

Karnal and under alkaline conditions (pH 2<br />

~9.2)<br />

at experimental farm, Karnal. Significant<br />

differences were observed in seed yield amongst<br />

the genotypes evaluated, both under salinity<br />

and alkalinity stresses. Under salinity stress,<br />

seed yield ranged from 1.36 to 2.15 t ha -1 at<br />

Hisar and 1.16 to 2.50 t ha -1 at Karnal. Genotypes<br />

CSCN-09-6 (2.15 t ha -1 ) followed by CSCN-09-12<br />

(2.13 t ha -1 ) and CSCN-09-12 (2.13 t ha -1 ) at Hisar<br />

and CSCN-09-8 (2.50 t ha -1 ) followed by CSCN-<br />

09-3 (2.23 t ha -1 ) at Karnal showed highest seed<br />

yield. Further, genotype CSCN-09-9 showed<br />

minimum seed yield at both the places (Hisar,<br />

Karnal). Under alkalinity stress at Karnal, seed<br />

yield ranged from 0.32 to 0.97 t ha -1 . Genotypes<br />

CSCN-09-1 (0.97 t ha -1 ) followed by CSCN-<br />

09-6 (0.94 t ha -1 ) showed highest yield whereas<br />

genotype CSCN-09-9 (0.32 t ha -1 ) recorded<br />

minimum seed yield.<br />

Performance of mustard strains in AVT saline/<br />

alkaline conditions screening nursery<br />

Six genotypes were evaluated under salinity and<br />

alkalinity stress in AVT at experimental farm<br />

Hisar and Karnal. Significant differences were<br />

observed in seed yield amongst the genotypes<br />

evaluated. Under salinity stress, genotypes<br />

CSCN-09-14 (1.84 t ha -1 ) followed by CSCN-09-<br />

71


Crop improvement for salinity, alkalinity and waterlogging stresses <strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

13 (1.76 t ha -1 ) at Hisar and CSCN-09-16 (2.<strong>11</strong><br />

t ha -1 ) followed by CSCN-09-18 (1.89 t ha -1 ) at<br />

Karnal showed highest seed yield. Further,<br />

genotypes CSCN-09-18 (1.69 t ha -1 ) and CSCN-<br />

09-13 (1.66 t ha -1 ) showed minimum seed yield at<br />

Hisar and Karnal respectively. Under alkalinity<br />

stress at Karnal, seed yield ranged from 0.65 to<br />

0. 83 t ha -1 . Genotypes CSCN-09-18 (0.83 t ha -1 )<br />

followed by CSCN-09-13 (0.79 t ha -1 ) showed<br />

highest yield whereas genotype CSCN-09-16<br />

(0.65 t ha -1 ) recorded minimum seed yield.<br />

Evaluation of segregating material in mustard<br />

Four mustard populations namely i. e., Krishna<br />

X CS 52, CS 52 x Krishna, Krishna X CS 54 and CS<br />

54 X Krishna were evaluated. Two hundred sixty<br />

five lines were evaluated under the cross Krishna<br />

X CS 52 and one hundred thirty seven lines<br />

were selected based upon the yield for further<br />

evaluation. Hundred lines were evaluated for<br />

the cross CS 52 x Krishna. Out of these lines,<br />

forty lines were selected for further evaluation.<br />

Four hundred sixty lines were evaluated for the<br />

cross CS 54 X Krishna. Out of these lines, one<br />

hundred eleven lines were selected for further<br />

evaluation. Three hundred twenty five lines of<br />

the cross Krishna X CS 54 were evaluated. From<br />

these lines, one hundred thirty seven lines were<br />

selected for further evaluation.<br />

Cereal Systems Initiative for South Asia<br />

(CSISA) – Objective 2 (Strategic Experimental<br />

Plat forms for Future Cereal Systems) (National<br />

Agricultural <strong>Research</strong> team) : D.K. Sharma,<br />

P.C. Sharma, N.P.S. Yaduvanshi and H.S. Jat;<br />

CGIAR team: M. Gathala, Y.P.S. Saharawat, V.<br />

Kumar and J.K. Ladha)<br />

Developing crop and resource management<br />

practices for sustainable future cereal based<br />

systems<br />

The project aims to devise strategies to reorient<br />

the rice-wheat cropping system in Indo-Gangetic<br />

Plains keeping into consideration the declining<br />

yields, depleting natural resources, climatic<br />

changes and water and labour shortages being<br />

faced by the present day agriculture. Further,<br />

objective is to design next generation of cereal<br />

systems that are highly productive, resource<br />

efficient, sustainable, and adapted to the<br />

expected changes in environment and socioeconomic<br />

endowments. This research will be<br />

conducted by National Agricultural <strong>Research</strong><br />

(NARES) partners in collaboration with IRRI and<br />

CIMMYT using closely monitored experimental<br />

platforms at selected locations which are<br />

also used as hubs for delivery and adaptive<br />

research. The experimental platforms would be<br />

near-production scale long-term experiments<br />

designed to assess the performance of different<br />

agricultural systems, using a wide range of<br />

indicators. Four scenarios have been planned<br />

for research platform at <strong>CSSRI</strong>, Karnal.<br />

During rabi 2009-10, wheat was sown in all the<br />

four scenarios with cv. PBW 47 in scenario I and<br />

DBW 17 in scenarios II, III and IV. Significant<br />

differences in seed yield was recorded amongst<br />

different scenarios, however, scenarios II, III<br />

and IV did not differ significantly amongst<br />

themselves. During summer <strong>2010</strong>, fields in<br />

scenario I were kept fallow, whereas mungbean<br />

(cv. SML 668) was sown after wheat harvesting<br />

in scenarios II, III and IV on 24.4.<strong>2010</strong>. One<br />

picking of the mungbean pods was taken in<br />

scenario II, whereas no picking was done in<br />

scenarios III and IV. The standing mungbean<br />

crop was knocked down and the whole biomass<br />

was retained in the field itself. Direct seeded rice<br />

was taken up in scenario III and maize was taken<br />

up in scenario IV. As per the plan outlined for<br />

different scenarios, all residues were removed<br />

both in rice (kharif 2009) and wheat (rabi 2009-10)<br />

in scenario I (Table 44). In scenario II, anchored<br />

residue (30%) of rice (kharif 2009) and wheat<br />

(rabi 2009-10) and 100% residue of mungbean<br />

was incorporated in field in successive crops. In<br />

scenarios III and IV, 100% residue of rice (kharif<br />

2009), 30% anchored residue of wheat (rabi 2009-<br />

10) and 100% residue of mungbean was retained<br />

in field in successive crops. In this way, around<br />

9 tonne residue was added in a year in field in<br />

scenario II and around 14-15 tonne residue was<br />

added in a year’s time in scenarios III and IV.<br />

During kharif <strong>2010</strong>, rice cv. Pusa 44 seedlings<br />

were transplanted in scenario I as per farmers’<br />

practice on 7.7.<strong>2010</strong>. In scenario II, rice cv. Arize<br />

6444 seedlings were transplanted on 28.6.<strong>2010</strong>.<br />

In scenario III, rice cv. Arize 6129 was directly<br />

sown using turbo seeder on 18.6.<strong>2010</strong>. Maize<br />

cv. NK 6240 was directly sown using multicrop<br />

planter in scenario IV on 6.7.<strong>2010</strong>. Nonsignificant<br />

differences were recorded in rice and<br />

maize yields in different scenarios (Table 45).<br />

72


<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

Crop improvement for salinity, alkalinity and waterlogging stresses<br />

Table 44 : Residue applied in different crop season scenarios<br />

Scenario<br />

Performance of rice in scenarios I, II, III and maize in scenario IV during kharif <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

Rice in wheat<br />

2009-10<br />

Residue carried over in successive crop (t ha -1 )<br />

Wheat in green gram<br />

<strong>2010</strong><br />

Green gram in rice<br />

<strong>2010</strong><br />

Rice in wheat<br />

<strong>2010</strong><br />

1 Removed Removed Fallow Removed<br />

2 4.20 3.50 2.59 4.<strong>11</strong><br />

3 9.39 3.60 2.20 10.20<br />

4 10.00 3.50 2.08 13.70<br />

Table 45 : Crop productivity in different scenarios during 2009-10 cropping season<br />

Crop yield (t ha -1 )<br />

Scenario<br />

Wheat rabi 2009-10 Green gram <strong>2010</strong> Rice kharif <strong>2010</strong><br />

System (rice<br />

equivalent)<br />

1 4.99 - 8.00 13.32<br />

2 5.48 0.66 8.71 16.99<br />

3 5.53 0.00 7.97 13.86<br />

4 5.50 0.00 7.<strong>11</strong> 12.44<br />

LSD (5%) 0.23 - NS 1.18<br />

However, significant differences in system yield<br />

in a year was observed on rice equivalent basis.<br />

Irrigation water applied was measured in all the<br />

four scenarios and water productivity was also<br />

computed accordingly. Water applied (327–346<br />

mm) during wheat season 2009-10 did not differ<br />

significantly in different scenarios, whereas<br />

water productivity differed significantly (1.45<br />

kg grain m -3 water in scenario I and 1.63 to1.68<br />

in scenarios II, III and IV). Further, water<br />

applied differed significantly amongst different<br />

scenarios in rice crop <strong>2010</strong>. In scenario I, 1943 mm<br />

total water was applied whereas in scenarios II<br />

and III, it was 1352 and 1341 mm. In scenario IV<br />

maize, 126 mm water was applied during kharif<br />

<strong>2010</strong>.<br />

73


<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

AGROFORESTRY IN SALT AFFECTED SOILS<br />

Evaluation of Biosaline Agroforestry systems<br />

for Dry Regions (R.K. Yadav, J.C. Dagar,<br />

Khajanchi Lal, Gajender Yadav, and C.B.<br />

Pandey)<br />

The project initiated in 2008 at Bir Forest <strong>Research</strong><br />

Farm of <strong>CSSRI</strong> at Hisar, was continued during<br />

the period under report. Field experiments on<br />

agro-horticulture with clusterbean–mustard<br />

cropping system in karonda (Carissa carandas),<br />

aonla (Emblica officinalis) and bael (Aegle marmelos);<br />

agro-forestry with pearl millet–mustard,<br />

pearl millet-barley, Aloe vera and para grass<br />

in Prosopis alba and agri-silviculture with mix<br />

grass in Ailanthus excelsa and Acacia ampliceps<br />

were continued with the objective of assessing<br />

their performance on sandy loam soils of semiarid<br />

region with availability of only saline<br />

groundwater as source of irrigation.<br />

The three horticultural tree species were initially<br />

established with four irrigation methods<br />

comprising of T 1<br />

- traditional ring method using<br />

low salinity (3.5 to 4.0 dS m -1 ) groundwater; T 2<br />

–<br />

furrow irrigation with low salinity groundwater;<br />

T 3<br />

– furrow irrigation with alternate use of low<br />

and high salinity groundwater and T 4<br />

–furrow<br />

irrigation with high salinity (8-10 dS m -1 )<br />

groundwater. The forestry species of Prosopis<br />

alba, Ailanthus excelsa and Acacia ampliceps were<br />

established in rainy season of 2009 with furrow<br />

irrigation of low (T 2<br />

), alternate use of low and<br />

high (T 3<br />

), and high saline (T 4<br />

) groundwater<br />

after monsoon. However, during last year, the<br />

irrigation treatments T 1<br />

and T 2<br />

were combined as<br />

T 2<br />

, while T 3<br />

and T 4<br />

remained as such treatments<br />

in agro-horticulture and Prosopis alba based agroforestry.<br />

In mix grass with Ailanthus excelsa and<br />

Acacia ampliceps silvi-pasture system only two<br />

irrigations of high salinity groundwater were<br />

given during May and December.<br />

Performance of horticultural species in terms<br />

of fruit yield indicated the highest yield of bael<br />

with 3.98, 3.36 and 2.08 t ha -1 in T 2<br />

, T 3<br />

and T 4<br />

,<br />

respectively. It was followed by karonda with<br />

respective yields of 1.68, 1.46 and 1.34 t ha -1 and<br />

aonla with 0.52, 0.38 and 0.26 t ha -1 . The grain and<br />

straw yield of companion mustard-clusterbean<br />

is shown in Table 46. Yield of mustard was<br />

relatively better in aonla followed by karonda<br />

and bael but in case of clusterbean, the highest<br />

yield was recorded in bael followed by aonla was<br />

recorded in bael followed by aonla and karonda.<br />

The effect of saline water irrigation was higher<br />

in mustard than clusterbean. The yield level in<br />

clusterbean was low because of the excess rainfall<br />

during the crop growth period resulting in poor<br />

germination and crop stand establishment.<br />

In Prosopis based pearl millet–mustard, pearl<br />

millet-barley, Aloe vera and para grass in<br />

Table 46 : Grain and straw yield of mustard (CS 56) and cluster bean (local) under different tree species<br />

Tree sp. Irrigation method Mustard yield (t ha -1 ) Cluster bean yield (t ha -1 )<br />

Grain Straw Grain Straw<br />

Karonda Low salinity (T2) 1.24 2.57 0.80 1.47<br />

Alternate low & high salinity(T3) 1.20 2.50 0.74 1.38<br />

High salinity (T4) 1.02 2.40 0.72 1.30<br />

Mean 1.16 2.49 0.75 1.38<br />

Aonla Low salinity (T2) 1.64 3.30 0.98 1.69<br />

Alternate low & high salinity(T3) 1.56 3.21 0.92 1.64<br />

High salinity (T4) 1.47 3.32 0.86 1.56<br />

Mean 1.56 3.28 0.92 1.63<br />

Bael Low salinity (T2) 1.06 2.25 1.03 1.84<br />

Alternate low & high salinity(T3) 1.13 2.44 0.94 1.73<br />

High salinity (T4) 0.98 2.17 0.96 1.75<br />

Mean 1.05 2.29 0.97 1.77<br />

Note : Agroforestry system initiated this year only<br />

74


<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

Agroforestry in salt affected soils<br />

Prosopis alba, the yield of pearl millet was 2.78,<br />

2.59 and 2.14 t ha -1 , respectively in irrigation<br />

with low salinity, alternate use of low and high<br />

salinity and high salinity groundwater. The<br />

respective fresh and dry biomass yield of para<br />

grass was 16.24, 14.86 and 12.93 t ha -1 , and 3.95,<br />

3.87 and 3.72 t ha -1 . While Aloe vera has not been<br />

harvested so far. An increase of about 68 per cent<br />

in fresh biomass of mix grass in Ailanthus excelsa<br />

and Acacia ampliceps silvi-pastoral system was<br />

recorded with two irrigations of high salinity<br />

water in comparison to no irrigation.<br />

Bael produced maximum yield with 3-6 dS m -1<br />

salinity irrigation water followed by karonda.<br />

However, yield of companion mustard-cluster<br />

bean was better with aonla and karonda.<br />

Control of Waterlogging and <strong>Salinity</strong> through<br />

Agro forestry Interventions (J.C. Dagar, Jeet<br />

Ram, Khajanchi Lal and S.K. Chaudhari)<br />

To suggest tree plantation model for control of<br />

water logging and salinity through appropriate<br />

plantations, field experiments at farmer’s field<br />

at Puthi (Hisar) were initiated in 2008 and<br />

continued in <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong>. The project area is land<br />

locked and bounded by two parallel canals<br />

(Mithathal and Jui) feeder in the east, Sunder<br />

Canal in the north and west and the Bass-Puthi<br />

road in the South. The area faces waterlogging<br />

almost during the whole year because of canal<br />

seepage, absence of natural drainage and low<br />

abstraction of groundwater due to its marginal<br />

quality. To deal with the problem of waterlogging<br />

and soil salinity, cloned Eucalyptus were raised<br />

on narrow ridges of field boundaries in different<br />

spacing (1mx1m, 1mx2m and 1mx3m) in North-<br />

South and East-West directions.<br />

From the project area, 22 soil profile samples<br />

were collected and analyzed for various physical<br />

and chemical characteristics. <strong>Soil</strong>s were found<br />

to be saline sodic with dominance of chloride<br />

and bicarbonates of sodium. Data collected on<br />

tree performance in different spacing indicated<br />

that both the tree height and diameter at breast<br />

height were the maximum in 1mx3m followed<br />

by 1mx2m and minimum in 1mx1m. However,<br />

the total tree wood biomass was in the reverse<br />

order. The average transpiration rate of two<br />

year Eucalyptus was found to be 15.6, 16.7 and<br />

Fig 35: Effect of tree spacing on water table draw down<br />

18.7 litres per day per tree in 1mx1m, 1mx2m<br />

and 1mx3m spacing, respectively. The results<br />

indicated that there was only slight increase in<br />

tree performance and transpiration rate with<br />

increasing spacing but the number of trees were<br />

3 and 2 times less in 1mx3m and 1mx2m spacing<br />

compared to 1mx1m spacing. Consequently,<br />

Eucalyptus trees in 1m x 1m spacing had higher<br />

biodrainage potential to lower the water table<br />

compared to wider spacing (Fig. 35). Tree<br />

plantation also lowered the soil pH and electrical<br />

conductivity of the soil compare to field without<br />

plantation. The crop cutting data revealed that<br />

the wheat grain yields were 206, 264, 280 and<br />

274 g m -2 in control, 1mx1m, 1mx2m and 1mx3m<br />

spacing, respectively.<br />

Effect of Water and <strong>Salinity</strong> Stress on the<br />

Performance of Tree Species (S.K. Chaudhari<br />

and C.B. Pandey)<br />

For evaluating the water requirement of tree<br />

species viz; Prosopis alba, Prosopis juliflora,<br />

Acacia nilotica, Tamarix articulata, and Eucalyptus<br />

in relation to soil and water salinity,<br />

the experiments were conducted with the<br />

objectives viz; i) To evaluate the irrigation water<br />

requirement of tree species under lysimetric<br />

condition; ii) To study the water and salt<br />

dynamics under varying moisture regimes; iii)<br />

To study the effect of water and salt stress on<br />

soil hydro-physical properties; iv) To study<br />

N-mineralisation and microbial biomass carbon<br />

behaviour under tree species. The results of the<br />

experiments are presented below :<br />

Height of Prosopis alba and Prosopis juliflora<br />

Results showed that the soil pH, water quality<br />

and irrigation schedules did not influence<br />

the height of Prosopis alba significantly upto<br />

the first six months and thereafter, the height<br />

75


Agroforestry in salt affected soils <strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

varied significantly. After nine months from<br />

the planting, irrigation schedule of IW/CPE 1.0<br />

recorded 188 cm average tree height, which was<br />

significantly superior over IW/CPE 0.5 on the<br />

soil with pH 9.6. However, at soil pH 7.5 and<br />

8.5, tree height was not influenced significantly.<br />

Water quality also showed significant effect<br />

only at pH 9.6, where normal water irrigation<br />

gave 18 cm plant height, significantly higher<br />

than saline water irrigation. <strong>Soil</strong> pH did not<br />

influence tree height significantly upto 9<br />

months after planting. Results recorded 12<br />

months after planting showed that the length<br />

of Prosopis alba was significantly influenced<br />

by irrigation schedules, water quality and soil<br />

pH. Average tree height at pH 7.5 and 8.5 was<br />

significantly higher than the average tree height<br />

at pH 9.6. Irrigations scheduled at IW/CPE 1.0<br />

recorded significantly superior plant height as<br />

compared with the IW/CPE 0.5 at all the soil<br />

pH levels. Irrigation with normal water resulted<br />

in significantly higher tree height at all the pH<br />

levels as compared to saline water irrigation.<br />

Interaction of soil pH, irrigation schedules and<br />

water quality was significant 12 months after<br />

planting of Prosopis alba.<br />

Upto six months from the planting, none of<br />

the treatments influenced height of Prosopis<br />

juliflora significantly. After nine months, tree<br />

height was significantly influenced by the water<br />

quality at soil pH 8.5 and 9.6. However, after 12<br />

months, tree height was significantly influenced<br />

by irrigation schedules, water quality and<br />

soil pH. Interaction effects of the three factors<br />

were significant. Frequent irrigation at all soil<br />

pH levels recorded significantly greater tree<br />

height as compared to irrigation at IW/CPE<br />

0.5. Irrigation with EC 5 dS m -1 water reduced<br />

tree height significantly at high pH levels as<br />

compared to normal pH level.<br />

Collar diameter of Prosopis alba and Prosopis<br />

juliflora<br />

Results showed that the collar diameter of<br />

Prosopis alba also remained unaffected by<br />

different factors upto first six months of planting.<br />

Significant effect of irrigation schedules and<br />

water quality on collar diameter was noticed<br />

only after 9 months. However, 12 months after<br />

planting, all the three factors significantly<br />

influenced collar diameter of Prosopis alba and<br />

their interaction were also significant. Average<br />

collar diameter in the soils with pH 9.6 was 2.70<br />

cm, significantly smaller than the average collar<br />

diameter in normal soils. Frequent irrigation<br />

gave significantly bigger collar diameter while<br />

irrigation with EC 5 dS m -1 water gave smaller<br />

collar diameter.<br />

Similarly, after 9 months from the planting,<br />

the collar diameter of Prosopis juliflora was<br />

significantly affected by water quality only and<br />

the other factors (irrigation and soil pH) did<br />

not influence the collar diameter significantly.<br />

Differences in the collar diameter of Prosopis<br />

juliflora were significant due to irrigation, water<br />

quality and soil pH at 12 months after planting.<br />

Total biomass of Prosopis alba and Prosopis<br />

juliflora<br />

The total biomass of Prosopis alba and Prosopis<br />

juliflora recorded after 12 months, was<br />

significantly influenced by irrigation schedules,<br />

water quality and soil pH and the interactions<br />

between various factors were significant.<br />

Prosopis alba in soil pH 9.6 gave the total biomass<br />

of 1469 g, which was significantly less than the<br />

biomass recorded in soil pH 7.5 conditions. In<br />

Prosopis juliflora average total biomass of 1558,<br />

1536 and 1504 g was observed in the soils with<br />

pH 7.5, 8.5 and 9.6, respectively. Frequent<br />

irrigation at IW/CPE 1.0 produced significantly<br />

higher biomass in both the tree species as<br />

compared to irrigation at IW/CPE 0.5 in all the<br />

soil pH conditions. Irrigation with normal water<br />

recorded significantly higher total biomass as<br />

compared to irrigation with saline waters.<br />

Height of Eucalyptus tereticornis, Acacia<br />

nilotica and Temarix articulata<br />

The results indicated that there was no<br />

significant difference in the height of Eucalyptus<br />

tereticornis, Acacia nilotica and Temarix articulata<br />

upto the first six months. After 12 months from<br />

the planting, the height of these trees were<br />

significantly influenced by irrigation schedules<br />

and water quality. However, interaction effect<br />

was observed only in the case of Eucalyptus<br />

tereticornis. Frequent irrigation at IW/CPE 2.0<br />

gave the highest tree height in all the species,<br />

significantly superior over IW/CPE 0.5.<br />

Irrigation with saline water of 5 dSm -1 recorded<br />

significantly lower tree height as compared to<br />

the irrigation with the normal water.<br />

76


<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

Agroforestry in salt affected soils<br />

Table 47 : Effect of irrigation schedules and water<br />

quality on the total biomass (g) of<br />

Eucalyptus teriticornis, Acacia nilotica<br />

and Temarix articulata<br />

IW/CPE<br />

Water<br />

quality<br />

Normal<br />

water<br />

Total Biomass (g)<br />

5 dSm -1 Mean<br />

Eucalyptus teriticornis<br />

0.5 2050 1870 1960<br />

1.0 2510 2100 2305<br />

2.0 3250 2890 3070<br />

Mean 2483 2346 2445<br />

No irrigation 1250<br />

CD 0.05<br />

Irrig. = 515; WQ = NS; Interaction = NS<br />

Acacia nilotica<br />

0.5 1569 1521 1545<br />

1.0 1789 1765 1777<br />

2.0 2156 2105 2130<br />

Mean 1821 1805 1817<br />

No irrigation <strong>11</strong>29<br />

CD 0.05<br />

Irrig. = 342; WQ = NS; Interaction = NS<br />

Temarix articulata<br />

0.5 1572 1489 1541<br />

1.0 1792 1752 1769<br />

2.0 2146 1989 2122<br />

Mean 1800 1782 1813<br />

No irrigation <strong>11</strong>02<br />

CD 0.05<br />

Irrig. = 321; WQ = NS; Interaction = NS<br />

After 12 months from the planting, total biomass<br />

of these trees was recorded and presented in<br />

Table 47. Results showed that only irrigation<br />

could give significant differences in total<br />

biomass of these tree species and no significant<br />

effect of water quality was recorded. Frequent<br />

irrigation at IW/CPE 2.0 recorded significantly<br />

higher total biomass over IW/CPE 0.5. There<br />

was no statistically significant difference in the<br />

total biomass under irrigation schedule IW/<br />

CPE 0.5 and 1.0.<br />

<strong>Soil</strong> organic carbon, NO 3<br />

-N and NH 4<br />

-N under<br />

different tree species<br />

After 12 months, the data on soil organic carbon,<br />

NO 3<br />

-N and NH 4<br />

-N was recorded in the soils<br />

growing various tree species. No systematic<br />

effect of irrigation and water quality treatments<br />

was observed on the soil organic carbon, NO 3<br />

-N<br />

and NH 4<br />

-N. This may be because of the fact<br />

that 12 months growth period is too short to get<br />

these effects.<br />

Different irrigation schedules and salinity<br />

treatments did not influence height and girth<br />

of the trees significantly in the first six months.<br />

However, impact was visible in some species<br />

only after six months.<br />

Tree-soil Interactions vis-à-vis <strong>Soil</strong> Fertility<br />

Improvement in Sodic and Reclaimed Sodic<br />

<strong>Soil</strong>s (C.B. Pandey, S.K. Chaudhari, J.C. Dagar)<br />

Seasonal dynamics of ECe, pH, Na, Ca, Mg,<br />

organic carbon, nitrate N, ammonium N and<br />

microbial biomass carbon (MB-c) were studied at<br />

different soil depths under Prosopis juliflora trees<br />

in sodic soil at the Saraswati forest. Treatment<br />

included the trees of 6 ages (0, 2, 3, 6, 10 and<br />

15 yrs), 2 canopy positions (near trunk and mid<br />

canopy) and 7 soil depths (0-15, 15-30, 30-45, 45-<br />

60, 60-75, 75-90, 90-105 cm). 0-yr age was treated<br />

as a control. Native soil was sodic with ECe 3.6<br />

± 0.30 dS m -1 and pH 10.4 ± 0.31.<br />

Chemical analysis of the soils revealed that<br />

with passage of age (0-15 yr), ECe, pH, Na and<br />

K declined (3.82 to 0.92 dS m -1 , 10.21 to 7.15,<br />

219 to 33 µg g -1 , 79.9 to 60.3 µg g -1 , respectively)<br />

in 0-15 cm and all other soil depths under the<br />

tree. The decline was found, however, up to 60<br />

cm depth. Values of the parameters at near the<br />

trunk did not differ with that at mid canopy<br />

position, hence average values are presented.<br />

Regression analysis of the data revealed that<br />

they followed the decay exponential model; this<br />

indicated that decline in these parameters in the<br />

beginning was slow up to 5 yrs and increased<br />

thereafter at a relatively rapid rate. Contrary to<br />

+<br />

the above parameters, Ca, Mg, SOC, NO 3-<br />

, NH 4<br />

and microbial biomass carbon (MB-c) increased<br />

(1.18 to 4.9 me L -1 , 0.05 to 1.05 me L -1 , 0.03 to<br />

0.48 %, 0.05 to 0.30 µg g -1 , 55.4 to 215 µg g -1 ,<br />

respectively) in 0-15 cm and other soil depths<br />

with increase in the age of the tree, the increase,<br />

however, was significant up to 60 cm depth.<br />

(Fig. 36). These parameters followed the<br />

exponential model of increase. These suggest<br />

that water soluble carbon probably penetrated<br />

to the depths, which together with SOC<br />

contributed by the root litter and root exudates<br />

lowered pH, ECe, Na and increased cations like<br />

77


Agroforestry in salt affected soils <strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

Ca and Mg. During the rainy season, ECe and<br />

pH were slightly lower than the winter and<br />

summer seasons in upper depths (up to 60 cm)<br />

of the soils. In deeper soil depths, no significant<br />

variation was observed. Similar observations<br />

were made in almost all the parameters. Nitrate<br />

N, ammonium N and MB-c were greater in the<br />

upper soil depths and declined with depth.<br />

Greater N transformations and MB-c under<br />

the older trees indicated that the soils became<br />

biologically active with passage of time under<br />

Prosopis juliflora trees.<br />

Fig. 36 : Changes in the parameters with age in different depths under Prosopis trees<br />

78


<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

RECLAMATION AND MANAGEMENT OF ALKALI SOILS OF<br />

CENTRAL AND EASTERN GANGATIC PLAINS<br />

Land Modification for Increasing Water<br />

Productivity by Different Farming Systems<br />

in Waterlogged Sodic <strong>Soil</strong>s along the Sharda<br />

Sahayak Canal Command of U.P. (D.K. Sharma,<br />

Y.P. Singh, V.K. Mishra, C.L. Verma and<br />

P.K. Varshney)<br />

A fish pond based integrated farming system<br />

model was developed over an area of 1 ha<br />

consisting of aqua culture, cereal crop<br />

production, vegetable, fruits and forage<br />

production system. A pond of 1.75 m depth was<br />

dug in 0.4 ha land. Initial soil pH was above 10 at<br />

surface and 8.8 below 1 m depth. Depth of water<br />

in the pond varied from 0.10 m to 1.25 m during<br />

December 2009 to November <strong>2010</strong> (Fig. 37). The<br />

maximum volume of stored water was 5440 m 3 .<br />

Canal closure from 23 April to 31 May, <strong>2010</strong> and<br />

31 October to 30 November, <strong>2010</strong>. During the<br />

year <strong>2010</strong>, pond dried first time due to more than<br />

one month of canal closure in summer season.<br />

The pH and EC of the pond water was in the safe<br />

range for fish production. Rice, wheat, sorghum<br />

(forage), mustard, garlic and onion were grown<br />

successfully on embankment and elevated field<br />

beds. Six thousand fingerlings of three species<br />

Fig. 37 : Water depth fluctuation in pond<br />

namely Rohu, Catla and Mrigal were stocked<br />

during the month of August <strong>2010</strong>. Maximum<br />

B:C of 4.82 was obtained for fish production<br />

system. Average B:C was 3.17 for the system as<br />

a whole (Table 48)<br />

Study on Salt and Water Dynamics and Crop<br />

Performance in Waterlogged Sodic <strong>Soil</strong>s Under<br />

Raised and Sunken Beds (Chhedi Lal Verma,<br />

Y.P. Singh and T. Damodaran)<br />

Traditional reclamation practices under shallow<br />

water table conditions do not last for a long<br />

time. Therefore, alternative to these practices<br />

deserves due attention. Excessive seepage from<br />

View of farming system model at Kashrawan, Raibareli<br />

79


Reclamation and management of alkali soils of central and eastern gangatic plains <strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

Table 48 : Benfit cost ratio for different farming<br />

systems<br />

Systems<br />

Cost of<br />

cultivation<br />

(`)<br />

Gross<br />

income<br />

(`)<br />

Net<br />

return<br />

(`)<br />

B:C<br />

Fish 8,500 40,970 32,470 4.82<br />

Cereals 6,540 <strong>11</strong>,240 4,700 1.71<br />

Vegetables 4,235 10,456 6,221 2.46<br />

Forage 1,480 3,218 1,738 2.17<br />

Total 20,755 65,884 45,129 3.17<br />

unlined canal is the reason for waterlogging.<br />

Salt accumulation due to continuous seepage<br />

in the deeper soil profile is less as compared to<br />

the soil surface. Consequently, the soil pH is<br />

higher at the surface and low towards deeper<br />

profiles. Raised and sunken bed system seemed<br />

to be an appropriate alternative for small and<br />

marginal farmers. Most profitable crops, crop<br />

rotations, water management practices need<br />

to be worked out before large scale adoption<br />

of such technology. A study on raised and<br />

sunken bed was taken up in Sharda Sahayak<br />

Canal Command in village Kashrawan, district<br />

Raebareli with the objective to bring waterlogged<br />

sodic soils under cultivation.<br />

<strong>Soil</strong> pH at severely affected land was 10.0 at<br />

surface and 8.40 below 1 m depth. Two raised<br />

beds of 60 m lengths were constructed during<br />

the month of June 2009. After formation of<br />

raised and sunken beds, the average pH 2<br />

of first<br />

raised bed was observed to be 9.4 and EC 2<br />

0.43<br />

dS m -1 and that of second raised bed average pH 2<br />

was 8.6 and EC 0.14 dS m-1 . Top width of raised<br />

beds was kept as 2.0 m and bottom width as 4 m.<br />

Bed width of sunken bed was 7.0 m. Boundary<br />

embankment width was also kept 2.0 m wide<br />

except for the boundary bunds towards south<br />

which was only one meter wide on the top.<br />

Total area under raised and sunken beds and<br />

boundary beds was 3560 m 2 . Out of this, raised<br />

beds are over an area of 1266 m 2 , sunken beds of<br />

2293 m 2 . Area under boundary beds is 786 m 2 .<br />

Saplings of vegetable crops were planted in<br />

ring basin on raised beds filled with parent soil<br />

and farm yard manure during the first week of<br />

August. Karemua/nali sag was also planted on<br />

the raised bed. Eighty banana saplings were<br />

planted in ring basin over raised bed on three<br />

sides of large sunken bed. Plantation was done<br />

only on the inner side for the ease to apply<br />

irrigation water from the sunken bed during<br />

dry period. Rice was transplanted in sunken bed<br />

during summer and kharif seasons. Yield data of<br />

vegetables and rice are presented in Table 49.<br />

Salt dynamics in raised beds<br />

Average variation of EC and pH in raised beds<br />

are presented in Table 50. First soil sampling up<br />

to 1.20 m depth was done after kharif 2009. EC of<br />

first raised bed during November 2009 ranged<br />

from 0.90 dS m -1 to 0.36 dS m -1 and during<br />

November <strong>2010</strong> from 0.39 to 92 dS m -1 and that<br />

of second raised bed ranged 0.33 to 0.49 dS m -1<br />

during November 2009 and 0.32 to 0.77 dS m -1<br />

during November <strong>2010</strong> (Table 50). Similarly, pH<br />

of first raised bed ranged from 8.1 to 9.3 during<br />

November 2009 and 8.6 to 9.3 during November<br />

<strong>2010</strong> in 0-15 cm to 90-120 cm soil depths. The<br />

pH of first raised bed reduced after one year<br />

as compared to second raised bed, raised bed<br />

where pH seems to have been marginally<br />

elevated. <strong>Soil</strong> conditions on both the raised beds<br />

is improving.<br />

View of raised and sunken bed model at Kashrawan<br />

80


<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

Reclamation and management of alkali soils of central and eastern gangatic plains<br />

Table 49 : Yield of vegetable and rice crops under raised and sunken bed system<br />

S.N.<br />

Rabi crops<br />

(2009-10)<br />

Yield<br />

(kg)<br />

Summer crops<br />

<strong>2010</strong><br />

Yield<br />

(kg)<br />

Kharif crops<br />

<strong>2010</strong><br />

Yield<br />

(kg)<br />

1. Sponge gourd 6.20 Sponge gourd 29.50 Sponge gourd 172.2<br />

2. Mustard 28.50 Bottle gourd 60.50 Pumpkin 25.40<br />

3. Peas 2.95 Bitter gourd 3.50 Bitter gourd 27.85<br />

4. Chilies 5.00 Snake gourd 4.50<br />

Karemua/<br />

Nalisag<br />

120.50<br />

5. Bitter gourd 6.00 Cucumber 2.70 Chilies <strong>11</strong>.95<br />

6. Papaya 2.50 Cabbage 4.50 Chaulai 16.50<br />

7. Bottle gourd 22.30 Cauliflower 39.00 Bottle gourd 157.50<br />

8. Okra 1.00 Tomato 223.30 Brinjal 19.55<br />

9. Brinjal 12.40 Garlic 8.00 Okra 18.50<br />

10. Radish 140.50 Mustard, Sag 25.00 Cucumber 7.40<br />

<strong>11</strong>. Dill 34.10 Brinjal 65.30 Water melon 13.00<br />

12. Methi 10.40 Chaulai 9.50 Spinach 4.00<br />

13. Spinach 59.30 Capsicum 5.60 Radish 6.00<br />

14. Coriander 15.10 Chili 2.45 Finger millet 1.20<br />

15. Cabbage 29.80 Coriander 3.75<br />

16. Paprika 1.60 Onion <strong>11</strong>.50<br />

17. Onion 1.60 Karemua/Nali sag 16.90<br />

18. Water melon 12.30<br />

19. Okra 2.50<br />

20. Cow pea 3.40<br />

21. Cluster bean 2.30<br />

22 Rice (t ha -1 ) 3.00 Rice (t ha -1 ) 2.20<br />

Table 50 : Variation of EC and pH in raised beds at different depth<br />

<strong>Soil</strong><br />

Depth<br />

(cm)<br />

Av. EC<br />

(dSm -1 )<br />

Raised bed - 1 Raised bed - 2<br />

Nov. 2009 Nov. <strong>2010</strong> Nov. 2009 Nov. <strong>2010</strong><br />

Av. pH<br />

Av. EC<br />

(dSm -1 )<br />

Av. pH<br />

Av. EC<br />

(dSm -1 )<br />

Av. pH<br />

Av. EC<br />

(dSm -1 )<br />

Av. pH<br />

0-15 0.90 9.26 0.92 8.10 0.49 8.14 0.77 8.79<br />

15-30 0.80 9.34 0.92 8.92 0.37 8.13 0.50 8.80<br />

30-45 0.68 9.44 0.57 9.20 0.33 8.39 0.36 8.71<br />

45-60 0.64 9.14 0.48 9.27 0.36 8.57 0.32 8.58<br />

60-90 0.50 8.91 0.39 9.<strong>11</strong> 0.38 8.68 0.50 9.05<br />

90-120 0.36 8.66 0.53 8.41 0.53 9.34 0.69 9.28<br />

Resource Conservation for Rice and Wheat<br />

System through Intervention of Tillage<br />

and Crop Residue Management in Partially<br />

Reclaimed Indo-Gangatic Sodic <strong>Soil</strong> (V.K.<br />

Mishra, A.K. Nayak, Y.P. Singh, D.K. Sharma<br />

and Ranbir Singh)<br />

Experiment initiated in 2005 was continued with<br />

six tillage levels with and without residue as<br />

reported in previous annual report. During fifth<br />

year, the grain yield of 2.8 t ha -1 of wheat was<br />

recorded in conventional tillage and 3.2 t ha -1 in<br />

direct seeded rice + sesbania followed by zero<br />

tillage (Table 51). Under zero tillage, the yield<br />

was 3.1 t ha -1 . The combined effect of crop residue<br />

and tillage method further increased the wheat<br />

yield in comparison to the individual effect of<br />

crop residue and tillage. The yield component<br />

like plant height, number of tillers, spike length<br />

and test weight considerably increased in crop<br />

residue applied plots.<br />

Maximum rice grain yield (4.50 t ha -1 ) was<br />

recorded under direct seeded (Table 52) and it<br />

81


Reclamation and management of alkali soils of central and eastern gangatic plains <strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

Table 51 : Effect of tillage and crop residue on grain<br />

yield of wheat<br />

Tillage<br />

Without<br />

crop<br />

residue<br />

Grain yield (t ha -1 )<br />

With<br />

crop<br />

residue<br />

Mean<br />

Conventional 2.80 3.20 3.00<br />

Zero till – zero<br />

till<br />

Direct Seeded -<br />

zero till<br />

Direct seeded +<br />

sesbenia- zero<br />

till<br />

Puddling- zero<br />

till<br />

Dry ploughing<br />

- zero till<br />

3.10 3.30 3.20<br />

2.80 3.00 2.90<br />

3.20 3.50 3.35<br />

2.60 3.00 2.80<br />

3.00 3.20 3.10<br />

Mean 2.92 3.20 3.06<br />

Table 52 : Effect of tillage and crop residue on grain<br />

yield of rice<br />

Tillage<br />

Without<br />

crop<br />

residue<br />

Grain yield (t ha -1 )<br />

With<br />

crop<br />

residue<br />

Mean<br />

Conventional 4.30 4.40 4.35<br />

Zero till – zero<br />

till<br />

Direct seeded –<br />

zero till<br />

Direct seeded +<br />

sesbenia- zero till<br />

Puddling- zero<br />

till<br />

Dry ploughing -<br />

zero till<br />

4.20 4.30 4.25<br />

4.50 4.70 4.60<br />

3.40 3.60 3.50<br />

4.30 4.50 4.40<br />

4.40 4.40 4.40<br />

Mean 4.18 4.32 4.25<br />

Performance of rice under direct seeded and transplanted<br />

conditions<br />

Table 53 : Effect of tillage and crop residue on soil<br />

aggregates<br />

Treatments<br />

Micro<br />

(


<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

Reclamation and management of alkali soils of central and eastern gangatic plains<br />

tillage in wheat also showed significant increase<br />

in sequestration potential. The integration of<br />

zero tillage with crop residue further enhanced<br />

the sequestration rate in partial reclaimed sodic<br />

soil.<br />

Stress Tolerant Rice for Poor Farmers in Africa<br />

and South Asia (BMGF Project)–Farmers<br />

Participatory Varietals Selection Trial of Salt<br />

Tolerant Varieties (V.K. Mishra, D.K. Sharma,<br />

Y.P. Singh and S.K. Sharma)<br />

Mother trials<br />

Under the BILL & MILLINDA project funded by<br />

IRRI, one mother trial consisting of 12 varieties<br />

/genotypes viz;CSR 10, CSR 30, CSR 36, CSR-<br />

89IR-8, CSR-89IR-14, CSR-89IR-15, CSR- 2K 219,<br />

CSR 2K 242, CSR 2K 255, CSR 2K 262, N 359<br />

and Local was conducted during kharif <strong>2010</strong> at<br />

Lucknow. The soil pH was 9.5-9.6. Maximum<br />

yield 5.85 t ha -1 in CSR-2K 219 was recorded<br />

(Table 54) under sodic soil (pH 9.5-9.6) followed<br />

by CSR89 IR 8 (5.82 t ha -1 ), CSR 2K 262 (5.37 t<br />

ha -1 ), CSR 36 (5.27 t ha -1 ), CSR-89IR-14 (5.26 t<br />

ha -1 ) and lowest in Gangakaveri (3.67 t ha -1 ).<br />

Baby trials<br />

To scale out salt tolerant varieties selected from<br />

mother trials conducted during 2009, baby<br />

trials with two salt tolerant viz., CSR 36 & CSR<br />

89 IR-8 and one traditional variety/genotype<br />

were conducted on farmer’s field at 30 sites in<br />

six villages of Unnao and Lucknow districts.<br />

The soil pH ranged from 9.5-10.3. Yield data<br />

Table 54 : Yield of rice varieties in mother trial at<br />

Shivri farm<br />

Varieties Grain yield (t ha -1 )<br />

CSR-10 4.35<br />

CSR-30 2.35<br />

CSR-36 5.27<br />

CSR-89IR 8 5.82<br />

CSR-89IR14 5.26<br />

CSR-89IR15 4.24<br />

CSR-2K 219 5.85<br />

CSR-2K 242 4.37<br />

CSR-2K 255 4.57<br />

CSR-2K 262 5.37<br />

NDR-359 4.47<br />

Gangakaveri (Local HYV) 3.67<br />

Mean 4.63<br />

Fig. 39: Rice yield on farmers’ fields at different pH levels<br />

indicated that the variety CSR 36 gave the<br />

overall average maximum yield of 4.05 t ha -1<br />

followed by CSR 89IR- 8 (3.06 t ha -1 ) . Further,<br />

it is shown in the Fig. 39 that salt tolerant and<br />

local varieties performed equally good upto 9.3<br />

pH. At higher pH (9.3), the yield was drastically<br />

reduced under traditional variety (1.98 t ha -1 ),<br />

whereas salt tolerant variety CSR 36 performed<br />

better and 4.05 and 3.98 t ha -1 yield was recorded<br />

in Lucknow and Unnao districts, respectively.<br />

Impact Assessment of Climate Change on Crop<br />

Production under Salt Affected Environment<br />

of Uttar Pradesh (V.K. Mishra, Y.P. Singh, D.K.<br />

Sharma and T. Damodaran)<br />

Available weather data of past 30 years of three<br />

different stations viz; Lucknow, Kanpur and<br />

Faizabad of salt affected areas were collected<br />

from Indian Institute of Sugarcane <strong>Research</strong><br />

(Lucknow), C.S. Azad University of Agriculture<br />

and Technology (Kanpur) and N.D. University<br />

of Agriculture and Technology (Kumarganj,<br />

Faizabad). Temperature trend for 3 districts of<br />

U.P. were studied for wheat growing period i.e.<br />

from Nov-March. The maximum and minimum<br />

temperature during Nov-March has increased<br />

0.3 and 0.1 o C, respectively. Temperature of<br />

March has increased 0.47 o C for maximum and<br />

0.50 o C for minimum. As March is a crucial<br />

month for wheat production and < 3 mm rain<br />

was recorded for the study period, it is correlated<br />

with wheat yield for Lucknow station (Fig 40).<br />

The response curve was tested using heat<br />

capacity model for the yield of wheat in relation<br />

to temperature pattern (y=a+bx+cx 2 ; where,<br />

83


Reclamation and management of alkali soils of central and eastern gangatic plains <strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

Table 55 : Effect of date of sowing and zero tillage<br />

on grain yield (t ha -1 ) of wheat<br />

Date of<br />

sowing<br />

Normal soil<br />

Zero Conv.<br />

tillage<br />

Sodic soil<br />

Zero Conv.<br />

tillage<br />

12 Nov, 2009 4.5 - 3.2 -<br />

15 Nov, 2009 4.4 - 3.2 -<br />

20 Nov, 2009 3.5 3.6 2.9 2.8<br />

25 Nov, 2009 3.0 3.4 1.9 2.0<br />

05 Dec, 2009 2.3 2.8 1.6 1.8<br />

Fig. 40: Heat capacity model of temperature Vs wheat<br />

yield<br />

a=2.4968034, b=18<strong>11</strong>258 and c=-0.3880648).<br />

Analysis showed that wheat yield would<br />

decreased by about 8 per cent with 1 o C rise in<br />

temperature over the average temperature of<br />

March (23.3 o C).<br />

14 Dec, 2009 2.0 2.0 1.3 1.6<br />

20 Dec, 2009 2.0 1.8 0.9 0.7<br />

Conv. - Conventional<br />

Mitigation strategy for terminal heat effects on<br />

wheat<br />

Farmers’ participatory field trials were<br />

conducted on normal and sodic soil conditions<br />

in Raebareli and Barabanki districts to evaluate<br />

the mitigation strategies viz., advancing the<br />

planting time of wheat, use of salt tolerant<br />

cultivars and application of crop residue.<br />

In central part of U.P., wheat is sown around 25<br />

November to 15 December because of the late<br />

vacation of rice fields. To avoid the late planting<br />

of wheat, zero tillage technique was adopted.<br />

The results indicated that advancing the sowing<br />

date to 12 and 15 November considerably<br />

improved the wheat yield under both the soil<br />

conditions over late sowing by zero tillage and<br />

conventional method (Table 55).<br />

Use of crop residue and salt tolerant cultivars<br />

At five places in the same districts, rice residue<br />

(25% of total production) was applied just<br />

after wheat sowing. The crop residue helped<br />

in maintaining the soil moisture and thermal<br />

regime and saved about one irrigation.<br />

The application of crop residue produced more<br />

than 12 per cent higher yield in comparison<br />

Fig. 41: Effect of crop residue application on wheat yield<br />

production<br />

to unmulched plots in sodic and normal soils<br />

(Fig. 41). Also, use of salt tolerant varieties of<br />

wheat on sodic soils gave 29.41 per cent higher<br />

yield over normal varieties.<br />

International Rice Salt Stress Tolerance<br />

Observational Nursery (V.K. Mishra, D.K.<br />

Sharma and Y.P. Singh)<br />

To enhance the productivity of salt affected<br />

soil, a IRSSTON trial consisting of 30 genotypes<br />

(including 6 checks with two sensitive and 4<br />

tolerant) was conducted in sodic soil (pH 9.8-<br />

10.2) at <strong>CSSRI</strong>, Regional <strong>Research</strong> Station,<br />

Lucknow during kharif <strong>2010</strong>. Under sodic soil<br />

(pH 9.8-10.0), maximum yield of 3.41 t ha -1 was<br />

recorded in BMZ 8 followed by CSR 36 (2.72<br />

t ha -1 ), CSR 10 (2.52 t ha -1 ), BMZ 1 (2.36 t ha -1 ),<br />

BMZ 24 (1.56 t ha -1 ), CSR 23 (2.<strong>11</strong> t ha -1 ), BMZ<br />

4 (1.50 t ha -1 ) and lowest in BMZ 7 and BMZ 12<br />

(0.056 t ha -1 ).<br />

84


<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

Reclamation and management of alkali soils of central and eastern gangatic plains<br />

Performance of BMZ 8 lines in sodic soil ( pH 9.8-10.2)<br />

Nitrogen Response on Selected AVT-2 of<br />

Rice Cultivars under High and Low Input<br />

Management (V.K. Mishra, D.K. Sharma and<br />

Y.P. Singh)<br />

In AVT-2 trials, total nine entries were evaluated<br />

with three nitrogen levels i.e. 50, 100 and 150%<br />

of recommended dose. The soil was moderately<br />

sodic in nature (pH 8.9). The experiment was<br />

conducted with three replications in spilt plot<br />

design (plot size 5.6 m 2 ). The data indicated<br />

that increasing dose of nitrogen increased the<br />

rice yield in all cultivars (Table 56). Among the<br />

cultivars, the maximum yield of 6.59 t ha -1 was<br />

recorded from Gangakaveri and minimum (4.57<br />

t ha -1 ) from IET20329 under 150 per cent dose<br />

of N.<br />

Table 56 : Response of rice genotypes to nitrogen<br />

application in moderate sodic soil<br />

Genotypes<br />

50 %<br />

N<br />

Grain yield (t ha -1 )<br />

100 %<br />

N<br />

150 %<br />

N<br />

Mean<br />

IET 20328 4.58 4.73 5.<strong>11</strong> 4.81<br />

IET 20329 4.30 4.23 4.57 4.36<br />

IET 20330 4.10 4.23 4.78 4.37<br />

IET 21640 4.40 4.84 5.74 4.99<br />

IET 21641 4.81 5.53 5.70 5.35<br />

CSR 23 4.98 5.42 5.85 5.42<br />

CSR 36 5.47 5.87 6.20 5.84<br />

Jaya 4.52 4.60 5.02 4.71<br />

Gangakaveri 3.37 5.22 6.59 5.06<br />

Mean 4.50 4.96 5.51 4.99<br />

Identification of Genotypes in Cactus, Banana,<br />

Guava and Aonla for Tolerance to Sodicity<br />

and Standardization of Management Practices<br />

for Economic Livelihood in the Resource Poor<br />

Sodic Lands (T. Damodaran, V.K. Mishra, D.K.<br />

Sharma and C.L. Verma)<br />

Development of management practices under<br />

sodic soils for banana<br />

Performance of banana is being evaluated under<br />

sub-soil sodicity at Shivri farm. The treatments<br />

comprising T 1<br />

-50% Phosopogypsum; T 2<br />

- 50%<br />

Gypsum; T 3<br />

- 25% Phosopogypsum; T 4<br />

-25%<br />

Gypsum; T 5<br />

- 25% Phospogypsum + Mulch<br />

+ Psuedomonas; T 6<br />

= 25% Gypsum + Mulch +<br />

Psuedomonas; T 7<br />

=25% Phosphogypsum + Mulch<br />

+ Vermi compost; T 8<br />

=25% Gypsum + Mulch+<br />

Vermi compost; T 9<br />

=25% Phosphogypsum<br />

+ Mulch + Vermi compost+ Psuedomonas;<br />

T 10<br />

=25% Gypsum + Mulch+ Vermi compost+<br />

Psuedomonas; T <strong>11</strong><br />

=Control were imposed in<br />

banana suckers. The variety Pisang Awak was<br />

planted in pits of 60x60x60 cm size at a spacing<br />

of 2m x 2m. It was found that during the time of<br />

shooting, the pH of the soils in the treatments<br />

with 25% phospogypsum in combinations<br />

with vermicompost, mulch and Psuedomonas<br />

(native strains isolated from sodic soils of pH<br />

9.6) reduced from 9.14 to 8.74 (Fig. 42) which<br />

resulted in higher bunch weight (Table 57) of 16<br />

kg bunch -1 while in control the yield was 2.25 kg<br />

bunch -1 . The biochemical analysis of enzymes<br />

(Table 58) like peroxidase, polyphenol oxidase,<br />

phenyl alanine lyase and biochemicals like<br />

phenol and proline indicated positive correlation<br />

with the sodicity tolerance which elaborates the<br />

role of these defense enzymes.<br />

Fig. 42 : Changes in pH before planting and at<br />

shooting<br />

85


Reclamation and management of alkali soils of central and eastern gangatic plains <strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

Table 57 : Phenological characters of banana variety Pisang Awak<br />

Treatments<br />

Plant height<br />

(cm)<br />

Plant girth<br />

(cm)<br />

No. of<br />

leaves<br />

No. of<br />

suckers<br />

Bunch wt.<br />

(kg)<br />

T 1<br />

334.5 55.5 10.0 5.0 10.0 21.5<br />

T 2<br />

335.0 52.5 <strong>11</strong>.5 5.0 9.0 21.5<br />

T 3<br />

307.0 58.0 12.5 10.5 7.0 18.0<br />

T 4<br />

288.0 52.0 <strong>11</strong>.5 4.5 6.4 20.2<br />

T 5<br />

289.5 57.0 10.0 5.5 7.9 18.5<br />

T 6<br />

294.0 49.0 10.5 3.0 7.0 21.2<br />

T 7<br />

312.0 51.5 12.5 5.0 8.5 23.5<br />

T 8<br />

267.0 48.5 10.0 6.0 7.5 22.4<br />

T 9<br />

368.0 62.5 12.0 7.0 16.0 22.5<br />

T 10<br />

362.0 56.5 12.5 7.5 12.0 24.1<br />

T <strong>11</strong><br />

229.5 29.0 9.0 0.0 2.25 16.8<br />

CD (5%) 9.53 5.10 1.42 3.60 1.40 5.52<br />

SEd 4.57 2.45 0.68 1.73 0.67 2.72<br />

Table 58 : Changes in enzymes and biochemical contents at shooting<br />

Treatment<br />

PO<br />

(abs min -1 g -1 )<br />

PPO<br />

(abs min -1 g -1 ))<br />

PAL<br />

(nmol min -1 ml -1 )<br />

Proline<br />

(mg g -1 )<br />

TSS<br />

(%)<br />

Phenols<br />

(mg g -1 )<br />

T 1<br />

6.06 3.08 15.13 466.00 241.25<br />

T 2<br />

6.31 0.53 16.08 475.10 218.50<br />

T 3<br />

18.3 4.13 23.01 342.00 326.50<br />

T 4<br />

10.74 0.23 25.10 351.00 346.25<br />

T 5<br />

14.52 3.75 39.22 471.00 582.00<br />

T 6<br />

14.40 3.79 33.31 458.00 621.50<br />

T 7<br />

10.74 8.42 30.22 372.00 342.00<br />

T 8<br />

9.71 7.66 30.65 384.00 351.50<br />

T 9<br />

15.79 0.69 27.12 608.50 624.00<br />

T 10<br />

13.58 0.79 30.22 596.00 620.00<br />

T <strong>11</strong><br />

14.15 2.64 13.85 167.00 300.50<br />

CD (5%) 1.19 1.39 1.71 13.89 12.60<br />

SEd 0.57 0.67 0.84 6.83 6.28<br />

PO- Peroxidase; PPO- Polyphenol oxidase; PAL- Phenyl alanine lyase<br />

A view of banana experiment<br />

Banana bunch with 25% Phosphogypsum + Mulch +<br />

Vermicompost +Psuedomonas<br />

86


<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

Reclamation and management of alkali soils of central and eastern gangatic plains<br />

Cultivation of banana with 25% phosphogypsum<br />

along with vermicompost, mulch and CSR-1<br />

strain of Psuedomonas is a technology which<br />

could generate economic livelihood for resource<br />

poor farmers and also serve as a tool in sub-soil<br />

sodicity management<br />

Screening of banana, cactus and aonla for<br />

sodicity tolerance<br />

Four varieties of banana were screened for<br />

their performance under sodic soil (pH 2<br />

9.0–<br />

9.50 at 0-15 cm depth). It was found that the<br />

varieties Udayan and Karpooravalli exhibited<br />

higher yield (20.0 kg) than others (Table 59).<br />

Six accessions were selected in the aonla based<br />

on their yield and were evaluated for further<br />

selection. It was observed that the ACC.No.<br />

1 and ACC No.2 in five years old plantation<br />

showed higher yield of about 19.60 kg and<br />

18.50 kg, respectively. Four varieties of guava<br />

(Shweta, Lalit, Sardar and Allahabad Safeda)<br />

were screened under three different planting<br />

systems of 3.0 x 3.0 m, 3.0 x 1.5m and 2 x 1.5m.<br />

The trees under the spacing of 2 x 1.5m gave<br />

the highest yield (3.0 kg tree -1 ) with the variety<br />

Shewta. Technology for successful cultivation<br />

of vegetables as intercrops in guava orchards on<br />

the paddy straw with minimum soil medium of<br />

pH > 9.3 was developed. It consisted of a thick<br />

layer of 10 cm paddy straw spread over the soil<br />

and tied with ropes from the bottom so that they<br />

form a cavity where about 5 cm of reclaimed<br />

soil was spread, where vegetables were grown.<br />

Vegetables like bottle gourd and bitter gourd<br />

Table 59 : Performance of the banana varieties in<br />

sodic soils (pH-9.3 below 15 cm depth)<br />

Varieties<br />

Plant<br />

height<br />

(cm)<br />

Plant<br />

girth<br />

(cm)<br />

No. of<br />

leaves<br />

No. of<br />

suckers<br />

Yield<br />

(kg<br />

pl -1 )<br />

during summer while tomato and cabbage<br />

during rabi seasons were cultivated successfully<br />

on bed size of 4.0 x 0.4 x 0.3 m. An additional<br />

income ranging from ` 100-200 bed -1 could be<br />

obtained from the intercrops.<br />

Holistic Approach for Improving Livelihood<br />

Security through Livestock Based Farming<br />

System in Barabanki and Raebareli districts<br />

of U.P. (T. Damodaran, V.K. Mishra, D.K.<br />

Sharma)<br />

A NAIP-3 sub-project is being implemented<br />

in Barabanki and Raebareli districts of Uttar<br />

Pradesh. Two clusters in each district were<br />

chosen for the project with main focus on<br />

landless and small land holders. The following<br />

are the technologies were implemented.<br />

Commercial cultivation of banana using<br />

precision farming technology<br />

About 30 farmers adopted the technology<br />

where banana cultivation is being coupled with<br />

crops like moong bean and black gram during<br />

summer followed by early tomato, cabbage<br />

and cauliflower in monsoon. The technology<br />

was further strengthened with on farm vermin<br />

composting, mass multiplication of Psuedomonas<br />

and Trichoderma. The technology of rural poultry<br />

was also integrated for providing sustainable<br />

livelihood. The average income of the farmers<br />

who had adopted banana cultivation with<br />

composting is about ` 1,30,000 from an area of<br />

0.2 ha (Fig 43).<br />

G9 100 37 7 5.0 5.50<br />

Udayan 380 68 12 6.0 20.0<br />

Ney<br />

poovan<br />

Karpooravalli<br />

250 47 8 5.0 8.0<br />

334.5 55.5 10.0 5.0 12.0<br />

Banana cultivation at farmers’ field<br />

87


Reclamation and management of alkali soils of central and eastern gangatic plains <strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

Fig. 43 : Pre and post interventions income of the<br />

farmers in different enterprises<br />

Integration of technologies for sustainable<br />

livelihood under marginal lands and sodic<br />

soils<br />

An integrated approach was implemented<br />

for the marginal and landless farmers. Initial<br />

livelihood support was provided with backyard<br />

poultry, goat farming and therapeautic measures<br />

to increase the milk yield. An initial income<br />

of ` 14,000 was obtained. The average income<br />

obtained from vegetable as intercrop and<br />

pure crop was ` 22, 000. Later, they adopted<br />

commercial poultry with an income of ` 14,000<br />

within 90 days. Thus, the average total annual<br />

income of the beneficiary at the end of the first<br />

year including the cultivation of wheat on leased<br />

land of 1500 m 2 through zero tillage technology<br />

was ` 86,200. Advance sowing of wheat with<br />

Sowing of wheat by zero tillage<br />

zero tillage machine also helped to minimize the<br />

terminal heat effect during the month of March.<br />

An average employment of 155 man days was<br />

generated in a year. Apart from this, the family<br />

labour, which used to work at Lucknow started<br />

staying in the village itself to take up the venture<br />

as a family business. There was reduction in the<br />

expenditure to about ` 500 month -1 year -1 for<br />

per person<br />

Exploitation of microbial biodynamism in<br />

sodic soils<br />

One strain of Trichoderma viridae, Aspergillus niger,<br />

Aspergillus fumigatus was isolated from the soils<br />

of pH 9.7 and three strains of Psuedomonas. These<br />

strains were tested for the inability to multiply in<br />

sodic soils of pH ranging from 9.0 to 10.0. They<br />

are also being assessed for their bio-control and<br />

growth promotion activities under sodic soils.<br />

Strains of Psuedomonas isolated from soils of pH 9.7<br />

Trichoderma viridae under culture and microscopic view<br />

ACC.No.2 of aonla<br />

Bunch of Udayan variety of banana<br />

High density guava intercropped with<br />

vegetables on paddy straw<br />

88


<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

RECLAMATION AND MANAGEMENT OF SALT AFFECTED<br />

VERTISOLS<br />

Integrated Farming System Approach for<br />

Optimising Production from Saline Black<br />

<strong>Soil</strong>s (G. Gururaja Rao, M.K. Khandelwal, Anil<br />

R. Chinchmalatpure and Sanjay Arora)<br />

Saline Vertisols, which account for 0.1214 m ha in<br />

Gujarat State, due to their inherent physical and<br />

chemical constraints, hamper crop growth and<br />

productivity even at low salinities. The soils of<br />

Bara tract region comprising Amod, Vagra and<br />

Jambusar tehsils of Bharuch district have subsurface<br />

salinity, sodicity and accumulation of<br />

calcium carbonate. This region with a vast area<br />

of Vertisols has soil and ground water salinity<br />

as the major constraints in crop production.<br />

Farming system with in-situ water conservation,<br />

storage, recycling and utilisation of ground water<br />

for supplemental irrigation is an ideal strategy<br />

for enhancing crop/water productivity in saline<br />

Vertisols. Studies to evolve a farming system<br />

model for resource-poor farmers of this region<br />

giving emphasis to rain water conservation,<br />

enhancing water productivity through crop<br />

interventions (fruit trees, vegetables, biomass<br />

species, seed spices) have been conducted.<br />

The components of the system comprise a<br />

rain water harvesting structure (farm pond),<br />

fruit, vegetable, biomass species and field<br />

crops (spices) covering an area of 1.12 ha. The<br />

economic produce of vegetables and seed<br />

spices were harvested and water productivity<br />

(kg m -3 and ` m -3 ) and B:C ratio was calculated.<br />

Data indicated that spices had higher water<br />

productivity (in terms of monetary gains) as<br />

compared to vegetables (Table 60). Vegetables,<br />

however, had higher water productivity when<br />

yield is taken into account. The observations<br />

recorded during 2009 and <strong>2010</strong> by and large<br />

had the same trend. The low water requiring<br />

crops like dill, coriander along with vegetables<br />

because of their higher water productivity and<br />

B:C ratio are found ideal for the saline Vertisols<br />

of Bara tract (Table 61). Further studies on<br />

nutrients budgeting are in progress.<br />

Low water requiring crops like dill, ajwain<br />

along with vegetables because of their higher<br />

water productivitiy and B:C ratio are ideal for<br />

the water-scare saline Vertisols of Baratract.<br />

Table 60 : Performance of crop components under integrated farming system study<br />

Particulars Ajwan Dill Tomato Brinjal<br />

Area ( m 2 ) 480 1200 160 120 200<br />

Water applied (mm) 44 100 <strong>11</strong>0 200 134<br />

Yield (kg plot -1 ) 40 106 240 280 440<br />

Water productivity (kg m -3 ) 0.91 1.06 2.18 2.33 3.28<br />

Water productivity (` m -3 ) 72.7 31.8 12.2 18.7 17.6<br />

Cost of cultivation (`) 620 740 280 500 560<br />

Gross income (`) 3200 3180 1440 2240 3520<br />

Net income (`) 2580 2440 <strong>11</strong>60 1740 2960<br />

B:C 4.16 4.33 4.14 3.48 5.28<br />

Bottle<br />

gourd<br />

Table 61 : Water Productivity and B:C ratio of farming system components<br />

Parameter<br />

Spices<br />

Vegetables<br />

2009 <strong>2010</strong> 2009 <strong>2010</strong><br />

Water productivity (kg m -3 ) 0.984 0.985 2.40 2.59<br />

Water productivity ( ` m -3 ) 26.56 52.25* 13.03 16.16<br />

B : C 3.05 4.24 3.56 4.23<br />

89


Reclamation and management of salt affected vertisols <strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

Study on Effect of Sardar Sarovar Canal<br />

Command on Properties of Vertisols, Cropping<br />

Pattern and Socio-economic Status of Farmers<br />

of the Bara Tract Area of Gujarat State (Anil<br />

R. Chinchmalatpure, Sanjay Arora, S.K. Singh,<br />

R.K. Singh and H.S. Jat)<br />

Bara tract comprising of Amod, Jambusar and<br />

Vagra talukas of Bharuch district are affected<br />

by sub-surface salinity to a large extent. Bara<br />

tract comes under the Sardar Sarovar Canal<br />

Command area of Gujarat State and the farmers<br />

have started irrigated agriculture and majority<br />

of the fields near canal distributaries are under<br />

irrigation for rabi crops. Some farmers are also<br />

using tube well water as such and in cyclic<br />

mode with canal water for irrigation. During<br />

the reported period, soil survey was conducted<br />

in Vagra taluka of Bharuch district and soil<br />

sampling was done from the fields of farmers<br />

who are practicing irrigated agriculture using<br />

tube well as well as canal water for different<br />

crops like cotton, wheat, pigeon pea, sorghum<br />

etc. <strong>Soil</strong> sampling was taken to a depth of 90 cm<br />

with an interval of 30 cm i.e 0-30, 30-60 and 60-<br />

90 cm depth. Results of analysis showed that<br />

pH 2<br />

value ranged from 7.9 to 9.2 with mean of<br />

8.6, EC e<br />

value ranged from 0.58 to 8.0 dS m -1<br />

and showed increasing trend with depth. The<br />

bulk density ranged from 1.32 to 1.84 Mg m -3<br />

with mean of 1.46 Mg m -3 . <strong>Soil</strong>s of Jambusar<br />

taluka were analyzed for saturated hydraulic<br />

conductivity (HC) and values ranged from 0.01<br />

to 0.46 cm hr -1 . The high CEC and high base<br />

saturation percentage indicate the potential<br />

of these soils in terms of fertility. Saturation<br />

extracts of the soils were analysed for their<br />

Table 62 : Water balance at Samni farm, Bharuch (monsoon <strong>2010</strong>)<br />

Month<br />

Rainfall<br />

(mm)<br />

E R ROG RO CN<br />

88<br />

electrical conductivity, soluble cations and<br />

anions and the sodium adsorption ratio (SAR)<br />

was calculated. SAR ranged from 0.82 to 16.7<br />

with lowering of hydraulic conductivity as<br />

the correlation coefficient showed a significant<br />

negative correlation between HC and ESP<br />

(r =-0.57 at 1% level) and HC and SAR (r =-0.61<br />

at 1% level).<br />

Design, Development and Management of<br />

Surface Drainage System for Crop Production<br />

at Samni Farm (M.K. Khandelwal, A.R.<br />

Chinchmalatpure and S.K. Kamra)<br />

In order to effectively utilize the surface runoff<br />

generated in the farm during monsoon, surface<br />

drains were excavated and connected to the<br />

water harvesting structures. Nearly 2 km<br />

long (base width 0.60 m, depth 0.45 to 0.75 m)<br />

surface drains helped in reducing overall water<br />

stagnation period during rainy season of 2008-<br />

10. Rain water storage (volume and duration)<br />

increased for similar amount of rain 1063 mm<br />

in 2008 and 1053 mm in <strong>2010</strong> in all three tanks.<br />

Although estimated runoff decreased from<br />

473 mm in 2008 to 382 mm in <strong>2010</strong>, the surplus<br />

increased from 375 mm (2008) to 406 mm (<strong>2010</strong>),<br />

which also added to runoff collection. Rainfall<br />

analysis for Samni farm for <strong>2010</strong> indicated<br />

surplus rainfall in August (Table 62). Assuming<br />

that rainfall, runoff remained within the farm/<br />

catchment (say 20 ha) and no significant runoff<br />

entered from outside, a rise of 1.8 m (15.10 to<br />

13.80 m) and 2.45 m (from14.65 to 12.10 m) was<br />

observed at 2 piezometers installed in the study<br />

area during June 29-Oct. 29, <strong>2010</strong><br />

PET<br />

TW<br />

AET<br />

TW<br />

SUR PET PM EPAN<br />

June 66.0 59.0 22.7 20.0 218.0 66.0 - 177.9 108.0<br />

July 278.8 152.9 63.6 56.3 198.0 198.0 - <strong>11</strong>9.4 76.8<br />

Aug 496.8 174.7 244.2 225.2 167.0 167.0 406.0 98.0 50.4<br />

Sept 2<strong>11</strong>.3 139.9 92.8 80.7 178.0 178.0 - 97.5 33.6<br />

Total 1052.9 526.5 423.3 382.6 761.0 609.0 406.0 492.8 269.0<br />

ER- Effective rainfall; ROG- Run off under growing condition; RO CN- Run off curve No. 88; PET TW- Potenial<br />

evapotranspiration thornthwaite method; AETTW- Actual evapotranspiration thornthwaite method; SUR- Surplus<br />

rainfall; PET PM- Potential evapotranspiration penman monteith method; EPAN- Pan evaporation;<br />

90


<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

Reclamation and management of salt affected vertisols<br />

Bio-remediation of Coastal and Inland Salt<br />

Affected <strong>Soil</strong>s using Halophytic Plants and<br />

Halophilic <strong>Soil</strong> Microbes (Sanjay Arora, Ratna<br />

Trivedi, Anil R. Chinchmalatpure, G.G. Rao)<br />

Extensive survey was done in the coastal and<br />

inland salt affected lands of Gujarat. Six coastal<br />

and 3 inland salt affected districts of Gujarat<br />

were traversed and dominance of different<br />

halophytic species was identified. Different<br />

dominant halophytic species identified include<br />

Cressa cretica, Acacia catechu, Prosopis cineraria,<br />

Acacia catechu, Salvadora persica, Zizyphus<br />

nummularia, Tamarix ericoides, Suaeda maritime,<br />

Suaeda nudiflora, Aleuropus lagopoides, Avicennia<br />

spp. and Calatropis procera (Table 63). The<br />

rhizosphere soil samples from halophyte plant<br />

species were collected in duplicate from 27<br />

locations. Leaf, stem and root samples of the<br />

halophyte plants were also collected from each<br />

locations. One part of the rhizosphere soil sample<br />

were processed and analysed for soil physical<br />

and chemical properties and the other kept in<br />

refrigerator for isolation and characterization of<br />

dominant microbes. A laboratory experiment<br />

was conducted to evaluate the microbial activity<br />

as influenced by application of biological<br />

sludge and vermi compost under different<br />

salinity levels. It was observed that microbial<br />

activity significantly reduced when soil was<br />

irrigated with water of EC>10 dS m -1 (Fig. 44).<br />

However, biological sludge application helped<br />

in improving microbial activity. Pot studies<br />

Table 63 : Rhizosphere soil analysis of Halophyte<br />

species (from 4 locations each)<br />

Plant species pH 2<br />

EC 2<br />

Pilu (Salvadora persica)* 8.2 - 8.7 23.2 - 36.6<br />

Khair (Acacia catechu) 7.6 - 8.1 2.70 - 7.50<br />

Luni (Cressa cretica)* 7.9 - 8.3 16.8 - 28.3<br />

Luno (Suaeda maritima)* 7.8 - 8.4 19.4 - 33.5<br />

Ber (Zizyphus nummularia) 7.6 - 8.4 <strong>11</strong>.2 - 17.4<br />

Babool (Prosopis cineraria) 7.3 - 8.2 15.0 - 38.3<br />

Aak (Calatropis procera) 8.2 - 8.6 27.4 - 35.5<br />

Tamarix ericoides 8.1 - 8.8 32.4 - 37.1<br />

Aleuropus lagopoides* 7.9 - 8.7 31.4 - 39.6<br />

* Halophytes<br />

Fig. 44 : Microbial activity as influenced by salinity<br />

with different halophytes are being conducted<br />

to evaluate their salinity tolerance and their<br />

efficiency for salt uptake.<br />

Feasibility Study on Using Biological Sludge<br />

from Nitro-ETP Plant and Treated Effluent<br />

from Environmental Control Unit of GNFC<br />

(Unit 1) for Crop Production on Vertisols (G.<br />

Gururaja Rao, Sanjay Arora, M.K. Khandelwal,<br />

Anil R. Chinchmalatpure and D.K. Sharma)<br />

Environmental pollution is the major problem<br />

associated with rapid industrialisation,<br />

urbanisation and improved living standards<br />

of people. However, efforts are needed for<br />

controlling pollution resulting in the disposal<br />

of wastes by their conversion into utilisable<br />

raw materials. There are certain solid industrial<br />

wastes containing nutrients, manurial and<br />

ameliorative elements which can be used<br />

profitably in agriculture provided these are<br />

used scientifically and judiciously. Some of the<br />

industrial wastes like press mud containing<br />

high amounts of organic carbon and nutrients<br />

have the potential to improve the crop yields<br />

significantly.<br />

In the present study, attempts were made to<br />

explore and identify the feasibility of using the<br />

biological sludge (BS) generated from Nitro-<br />

ETP plant of Gujarat Narmada Valley Fertilizer<br />

Company, Bharuch in comparison to organic<br />

manures (OM) and their effect on crop performance<br />

and soil properties. Field experiments were<br />

conducted at Bharuch (Gujarat) with cowpea,<br />

cluster bean, Amaranth and lady’s finger to<br />

ascertain the response of biological sludge alone<br />

and in combination with organic manures<br />

viz;farm yard manure (FYM) and vermi compost<br />

(VC). Simultaneously, pot experiments were<br />

also conducted to test the efficacy of biological<br />

91


Reclamation and management of salt affected vertisols <strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

sludge in supplying nutrients to different crops<br />

viz; spinach and amaranth with treatments given<br />

in Table 64 and Table 65). The data of leaf yield<br />

of spinach obtained with two cuts indicated that<br />

biological sludge given along with NPK resulted<br />

in enhanced leaf yield, suggesting its efficacy in<br />

providing additional nutrient availability to the<br />

crop.<br />

Table 64 : Effect of organic manures and biological<br />

sludge on yield of spinach<br />

Treatments<br />

Vegetative yield (g pot -1 )<br />

1st Cut<br />

2nd Cut<br />

NPK (control) 8.6 24.9<br />

NPK+VC 1<br />

9.9 30.4<br />

NPK+BS 1<br />

10.8 31.4<br />

NPK+FYM 1<br />

8.9 26.9<br />

NPK+VC 2<br />

13.1 36.2<br />

NPK+BS 2<br />

13.7 39.2<br />

NPK+FYM 2<br />

10.1 30.9<br />

NPK+VC 1<br />

+BS 1<br />

15.0 38.3<br />

CD (5%) 1.1 3.8<br />

VC 1<br />

- First dose of vermicompost; VC 2<br />

- Second dose of<br />

vermicompost; BS 1<br />

- First dose of biological sludge; BS 2<br />

-<br />

Second dose of biological sludge<br />

The pots treated with biological sludge showed<br />

significant variation with all other treatments<br />

except the treatment comprising vermi compost<br />

given at full dose, suggesting biological sludge<br />

as an alternative nutrient source for leafy<br />

vegetables. However, in amaranth the biological<br />

sludge given in combination with NPK and/<br />

or FYM/Vermi compost gave higher leaf yield<br />

suggesting the additive effect of these manurial<br />

sources.<br />

Table 65 : Effect of organic manure and biological<br />

sludge on growth and yield of amaranth<br />

Treatments<br />

Vegetative<br />

tyield<br />

(g pot -1 )<br />

1st<br />

Cut<br />

2nd<br />

Cut<br />

Dry matter<br />

yield (g pot -1 )<br />

1st<br />

Cut<br />

2nd<br />

Cut<br />

NPK (control) 23.4 42.4 3.0 4.6<br />

NPK+FYM 25.8 45.8 3.4 5.4<br />

NPK+FYM 26.2 49.5 4.0 5.9<br />

NPK+VC 28.3 50.8 4.5 5.2<br />

NPK+BS 29.5 63.4 4.2 7.8<br />

NPK+1/2FYM<br />

+1/2BS<br />

NPK+1/2VC<br />

+1/2BS<br />

30.4 72.2 3.7 8.1<br />

31.7 77.9 5.1 8.2<br />

CD (5%) 3.3 8.4 1.2 0.8<br />

In the field study conducted with cluster bean<br />

using biological sludge and vermi compost<br />

@ 2 t ha -1 along with NPK, pod length and pod<br />

yield were found to be higher under biological<br />

sludge given in combination with organic<br />

manure (vermi compost) and NPK. Cluster<br />

bean, being the leguminous crop, responded to<br />

nitrogen rich NPK and Vermi compost (Table<br />

66). <strong>Soil</strong> samples collected at the initiation and<br />

completion of experiments indicated enrichment<br />

of soils with available N, P and K and with<br />

moderate increase in organic carbon suggesting<br />

the important role played by the biological<br />

sludge in soil enrichment (Table 67).<br />

Table 66 : Performance of cluster bean under biological sludge application<br />

Treatments<br />

Plant height<br />

(cm)<br />

Pods per plant<br />

45 DAS Maturity 45 DAS 60 DAS<br />

Pod length<br />

(cm)<br />

Yield<br />

(t ha -1 )<br />

NPK 62 72 8 <strong>11</strong> 7.4 5.12<br />

NPK+BS 73 94 <strong>11</strong> 17 9.2 7.67<br />

NPK+VC 78 105 13 18 10.3 9.46<br />

NPK+BS+VC 83 <strong>11</strong>2 15 22 <strong>11</strong>.2 9.66<br />

CD (5%) 9.7 14.5 2.5 4.8 1.8 2.16<br />

92


<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

Reclamation and management of salt affected vertisols<br />

Table 67 : Effect of biological sludge application on<br />

soil properties<br />

<strong>Soil</strong> properties Initial Final<br />

(after<br />

harvest of<br />

cowpea)<br />

pH (1:2.5) 8.2 8.1<br />

EC (dS m -1 ) 0.40 0.42<br />

Organic carbon (g kg -1 ) 4.4 5.6<br />

Available N (kg ha -1 ) 182 198<br />

Available P (kg ha -1 ) 14.2 16.4<br />

Available K (kg ha -1 ) <strong>11</strong>6 121<br />

Bulk density (mg m -1 ) 1.54 1.52<br />

Texture Clay Clay<br />

The biological sludge, due to the presence of<br />

important nutrients like nitrogen, phosphorus<br />

etc., form an ideal alternative nutrient source<br />

that meet the partial nutrient requirements of<br />

the crops. The studies indicated that the use<br />

of biological sludge from fertilizer industries<br />

can be a better option for sustainable<br />

management of lands for production of crops<br />

like leafy vegetables and cluster bean. Its use<br />

will help in improving soil properties visà-vis<br />

supply nutrients for plant growth and<br />

yield in Vertisols<br />

Farmers Participatory Action <strong>Research</strong> Project<br />

(FPARP) – at Bharuch (G. Gururaja Rao, M.K.<br />

Khandelwal, Anil R. Chinchmalatpure, Sanjay<br />

Arora, S.K. Kamra and Gurbachan Singh).<br />

Decline in water table has resulted in decline<br />

in farm productivity in Gujarat state due<br />

to deterioration in groundwater quality<br />

has resulted in increased pumping cost and<br />

associated environmental problem. Under<br />

FPARP project funded by Ministry of Water<br />

Resources (GOI), Regional <strong>Research</strong> Station,<br />

Bharuch has installed 15 recharge wells and<br />

renovated 4 farm ponds in Bharuch district<br />

(Fig. 45).<br />

Installation of recharge well involved drilling of<br />

400 mm dia bores and lowering of <strong>11</strong>0 mm dia<br />

PVC pipes, two blank and three strainers and<br />

filling with aggregates of 8-20 mm size followed<br />

by compressor to a depth of 30 m at almost<br />

Fig 45 : Location map of recharge sites<br />

under the FPARP Project<br />

all places (Borebhata, Kavitha, Kurchan and<br />

Samni) except at Chhapra (25.5 m due to quick<br />

sand flown in). Only at village Moriyana, due to<br />

rocky formation, the same was cut with cutter<br />

of 175 mm dia to a depth of 45 m and placement<br />

of 200 mm dia PVC pipe to a depth to top 6 m.<br />

The design features and the cost components<br />

are given in Table 68.<br />

Looking at the rocky formation at this site, the<br />

centre has taken another site at village Netrang<br />

close to Moriyana, where excavation to 40.5 m<br />

could be restricted. So far, it has been noticed<br />

that the water-table just after excavation of the<br />

recharge bore well gained certain depth due<br />

to flow of rain and runoff down the chamber.<br />

Quality of groundwater also improved during<br />

the same period. Similarly, the locations where<br />

the other recharge wells were constructed<br />

have also shown rise in water-table levels with<br />

significant improvement in the water quality.<br />

Groundwater recharge has helped in<br />

rise of water table at all the locations.<br />

The groundwater salinity has decreased<br />

considerably. Due to the recharging of the<br />

groundwater, the water quality at the farm<br />

was extended by few months so as to enable<br />

the farmers to give adequate irrigation to the<br />

crops. Some farmers have reported additional<br />

revenue due to prolonged water availability<br />

and improved water quality<br />

93


Reclamation and management of salt affected vertisols <strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

Table 68 : Location, design features and the cost of recharge wells<br />

Village,<br />

Taluka<br />

Month<br />

Depth<br />

(m)<br />

Bore<br />

Diameter<br />

(mm)<br />

Pipe<br />

Lithology Slits Compressor<br />

usage<br />

<br />

Cost<br />

(`)<br />

Moriyana, Valia<br />

Chhapra,<br />

Ankleshwar<br />

Borebhata,<br />

Ankleshwar<br />

Netrang, Valia<br />

Kavitha, Bharuch<br />

Kavitha, Bharuch<br />

Kurchan, Amod<br />

Samni, Amod<br />

Jhagadiya,<br />

Jhagadiya<br />

Finchwara,<br />

Jhagadiya<br />

June<br />

2008<br />

June<br />

2008<br />

June<br />

2008<br />

Nov.<br />

2008<br />

1, March<br />

2009<br />

2, March<br />

2009<br />

April<br />

2009<br />

April<br />

2009<br />

April<br />

2009<br />

April<br />

2009<br />

45.0 250/175* 200 Rocky -1.75<br />

m after 6 m<br />

of medium<br />

black soil<br />

30.0 400 125 Deep to<br />

medium<br />

black soils,<br />

river sand<br />

after 12 m<br />

3-75<br />

mm<br />

14850<br />

-do- 22535<br />

30.0 400 125 -do- -do- 25760<br />

40.5 250/175* 125 Rocky -do- 16650<br />

36.0 400 125 Med. Bl. <strong>Soil</strong><br />

with kankar<br />

from 24-30<br />

m<br />

-do- 23650<br />

30.0 400 125 -do- -do- 21500<br />

30.0 400 125 Deep black<br />

soils with<br />

kankar up to<br />

5.6 m depth<br />

-do- 24620<br />

30.0 400 125 - do- -do- 30727<br />

30.0 400 125 Med. Bl.<br />

River sand<br />

and murram<br />

at 27-30 m<br />

-do- 21500<br />

30.0 400 125 - do- -do- 25100<br />

Juna Tavra,<br />

Bharuch<br />

June<br />

2009<br />

30.0 400 125 Med to deep<br />

black soils<br />

-do- 29800<br />

Luna 1,<br />

Valia<br />

Luna 2,<br />

Valia<br />

June<br />

2009<br />

30.0 400 125 Medium to<br />

light black<br />

soils sand<br />

after 21 m<br />

-do- 23500<br />

May.10 30.0 400 125 -do- -do- 26500<br />

Pansoli, Valia<br />

Sodgam, Valia<br />

May.<br />

<strong>2010</strong><br />

May.<br />

<strong>2010</strong><br />

30.0 400 125 Med. To<br />

light black<br />

soil sand<br />

after 30 m<br />

-do- 26500<br />

30.0 400 125 -do- -do- 33600<br />

* 175 mm dia bore after 6 m depth<br />

94


<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

RECLAMATION AND MANAGEMENT OF COASTAL SALINE SOILS<br />

Use of Available Brackish and Fresh Water<br />

in the Coastal Area for Integrated Cultivation<br />

of Crops and Fishes (B.K. Bandyopadhyay,<br />

D. Burman, S.K. Sarangi, S. Mandal, K.K.<br />

Mahanta and B. Maji)<br />

A study was undertaken to increase the crop<br />

productivity and cropping intensity in the<br />

coastal area through rainwater harvesting and<br />

integrated crop-fish cultivation by utilizing<br />

natural water resources. For this purpose, an<br />

area of 2 ha at <strong>CSSRI</strong>, RRS, Canning town farm<br />

was reshaped into the following five different<br />

land shaping models. The cropping schedule<br />

followed under the different land shaping is<br />

given in Table 69.<br />

The land shaping models created a scope for<br />

multi-cropping instead of mono cropping (as in<br />

control plots) due to creation of different land<br />

types. Various crops like vegetables, fruits, field<br />

crops could be cultivated during rabi/summer<br />

season due to harvesting of rainwater which<br />

was used for life saving irrigations. The yield<br />

of each crop was converted into rice equivalent<br />

yield (REY) on sale price basis for comparison<br />

and presented in Table 70.<br />

Based on the experiments conducted during<br />

2009-10, economics of various land shaping<br />

models were calculated and the farm pond<br />

model emerged as the most profitable land<br />

shaping model with highest Benefit-Cost ratio of<br />

2.33 followed by paddy-cum-fish, deep furrow<br />

and high ridge, shallow furrow and ridge and<br />

paddy-cum-brackish water fish. All the land<br />

shaping models were generating higher net<br />

returns over the control plot (Table 71).<br />

The land shaping technologies also reduced the<br />

salinity build-up in soil of raised lands during<br />

dry months due to increased height of land from<br />

the brackish ground water and stored the rain<br />

water (fresh water) in the field. The soil salinity<br />

(ECe) in raised land of farm pond model was 4-5<br />

dS m -1 during the month of February compared<br />

to 6-7 dS m -1 in the control (Fig. 46).<br />

Appropriate land shaping has substantial<br />

scope in coastal areas for utilization of water<br />

resources and increasing farm income through<br />

integrated crop-fish cultivation<br />

Table 69 : Cropping schedule in different land shaping models<br />

Land shaping models Land type Kharif Rabi<br />

Paddy-cum-fish (PCF)<br />

Original land Paddy, fish Cotton, sunflower<br />

Bund Vegetables Vegetables<br />

Furrow Fish Fish<br />

Original land Paddy, fish Fish<br />

PCF-brackishwater fishery<br />

Bund Vegetables Vegetables<br />

Furrow Fish Fish<br />

Pond Fish Fish<br />

Farm pond<br />

Upland Vegetables Vegetables<br />

Medium land Short duration rice Sunflower, groundnut<br />

Low land Paddy Paddy, Kalmi sag<br />

Deep ridge and furrow Ridge Vegetables Vegetables<br />

Shallow furrow and medium<br />

ridge<br />

Furrow Fish Rice<br />

Ridge Fruits Fruits<br />

Furrow Fish Fish, paddy<br />

95


Reclamation and management of coastal saline soils <strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

Table 70 : Crop yield in the raised land of the farm pond<br />

Crop Variety Season Yield<br />

(t ha -1 )<br />

Price<br />

( ` kg -1 )<br />

REY<br />

(t ha -1 )<br />

Spinach Haldi bari Rabi 8.37 8.00 8.37<br />

Radish Pusa red Rabi 20.70 8.00 20.70<br />

Sugarbeet Ruby ball Rabi 18.75 6.00 14.06<br />

Cowpea Laffa Rabi 7.50 10.00 9.38<br />

Okra Avantika Kharif 8.85 20.00 22.16<br />

Amaranthus White kanta Rabi <strong>11</strong>.67 10.00 14.58<br />

Chilli Surya mukhi Summer 0.20 50.00 1.25<br />

Bitter gourd Meghalay Summer 17.50 20.00 43.75<br />

Bottle gourd Local Summer 26.25 10.00 32.81<br />

Basella Local Kharif 58.33 10.00 72.92<br />

Brinjal Local Kharif 7.17 10.00 8.96<br />

French bean Sel.9 Kharif 14.50 8.00 14.50<br />

Rice Local Kharif 2.20 8.00 2.20<br />

REY- Rice equivalent yield<br />

Table 71 : Economics of land shaping models<br />

Models<br />

(Total area)<br />

Total cost<br />

(` actual area -1 )<br />

Operational cost and returns (kharif + rabi)<br />

Total return<br />

( ` actual area -1 )<br />

Net return<br />

(` actual area -1 )<br />

B : C<br />

ratio<br />

I. Control (0.51 ha) 8,995 9,766 771 1.09 (6)<br />

II. Paddy-cum-fish<br />

(PCF) + field crops<br />

(0.51 ha)<br />

III. PCF (kharif) +<br />

Brackishwater fish<br />

(rabi) (0.52 ha)<br />

IV. Farm pond (FP)<br />

(0.36 ha)<br />

V. Deep furrow & high<br />

ridge (DF) (0.22 ha)<br />

VI. Shallow furrow &<br />

ridge (SF) (0.21 ha)<br />

23,997 53,696 29,698 2.24 (2)<br />

47,003 93,142 46,140 1.98 (4)<br />

18,098 42,201 24,103 2.33 (1)<br />

12,155 26,882 14,728 2.21 (3)<br />

12,979 26,820 13,840 2.07 (5)<br />

Value in brackets is rank of model based on B:C ratio<br />

Effect of Waterlogging on Tree Species for<br />

Agroforestry System in Coastal Salt Affected<br />

<strong>Soil</strong>s (D. Burman, B.K. Bandyopadhyay and<br />

A.R. Bal)<br />

Fig.46 : Variation of soil salinity in different land<br />

shaping models<br />

Diversification of agriculture through<br />

introduction of agroforestry systems in less<br />

diversified low-lying salt affected areas may<br />

enhance the farm income vis-a-vis livelihood<br />

96


<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

Reclamation and management of coastal saline soils<br />

security of the farming communities of coastal<br />

region. However, growing of tree species in most<br />

of the coastal land is quite impossible as it remains<br />

waterlogged for 5 months during monsoon and<br />

post-monsoon periods. Therefore, for growing<br />

tree species in the low-lying coastal area, the area<br />

was reshaped to different heights. Seven tree<br />

species viz; Eucalyptus sp., Acacia auriculiformis,<br />

Casuarina sp., Syzygium cumini, Heritiera fomes,<br />

Brugeria gymnorhiza and Xylocarpus mekongensis<br />

have been evaluated for their suitability for<br />

growing under 4 waterlogged situations (during<br />

kharif ) viz; lowland (upto 50 cm waterlogging),<br />

medium lowland (upto 25 cm waterlogging),<br />

medium upland (5 cm above water level) and<br />

upland (35 cm above water level). Waterlogging<br />

during kharif season affected the growth of all<br />

the tree species evaluated under 4 waterlogging<br />

situations. Syzygium, Casuarina, Heritieria and<br />

Xylocarpus survived initially but died gradually<br />

up to 4 th year of experiment under low land<br />

situation where continuous waterlogging<br />

prevailed throughout the kharif season. Though<br />

Acacia, Eucalyptus and Brugeria survived even<br />

in 5 th year of experimentation, however, their<br />

survival rate was very low (20-30%). The height<br />

and diameter of these tree species increased<br />

gradually from low land to upland situations,<br />

the highest being in upland situation (Table<br />

72). The growth parameters like height and<br />

diameter of Syzygium, Casuarina, Heritieria and<br />

Xylocarpus increased from medium low land to<br />

medium upland and medium upland to upland<br />

situations. Compared to previous year, the<br />

growth of all the tree species was better in the<br />

medium upland and upland situations than in<br />

low land and medium lowland situations. The<br />

better growth of trees in raised land situations<br />

could be due to better aeration of root zone soil<br />

in kharif and, more availability of soil moisture<br />

and less build-up of soil salinity in rabi/summer.<br />

After monsoon period, the trenches (formed due<br />

to land shaping) were filled up with rain water,<br />

which resulted in higher moisture content of the<br />

adjoining land areas and thus, more availability<br />

of soil moisture to the trees. This also resulted<br />

in less build-up of soil salinity due to reduced<br />

upward capillary flow of saline ground water at<br />

shallow depth. The salinity (ECe, dSm -1 ) buildup<br />

in the soil during the month of May was in<br />

the order of upland < medium upland < medium<br />

lowland < low land < original low land (Fig. 47).<br />

However, no change in soil pH was observed<br />

under different land situations. The paddycum-fish<br />

were grown in the interspaces of trees<br />

in kharif season and, average yield of rice (var.<br />

SR26 B) and fish (Indian major carps) were 3.88 t<br />

ha -1 and 1.01 t ha -1 , respectively. In rabi/summer<br />

rice and cotton were grown in the trenches and<br />

inter-spaces (flat lands), respectively. The yield<br />

of rice (var. Canning 7) was 4.24 t ha -1 and of<br />

cotton (var.LRA 5166) 1.96 t ha -1 .<br />

Table 72 : Effect of waterlogging on tree height and diameter (April, <strong>2010</strong>)<br />

Tree sps.<br />

Acacia<br />

auriculiformis<br />

Height<br />

(cm)<br />

Lowland Medium lowland Medium upland Upland<br />

Diameter<br />

(mm)<br />

Height<br />

(cm)<br />

Diameter<br />

(mm)<br />

Height<br />

(cm)<br />

Diameter<br />

(mm)<br />

Height<br />

(cm)<br />

Diameter<br />

(mm)<br />

149.08 36.59 316.49 54.59 322.50 69.37 396.41 71.71<br />

Syzygium<br />

cumini<br />

- - 172.04 45.18 228.28 64.41 231.83 66.77<br />

Eucalyptus<br />

spc.<br />

283.17 57.80 415.19 74.24 421.16 79.27 466.06 80.05<br />

Casuarina - - 538.77 70.69 170.33 37.23 556.67 82.73<br />

Heritieria<br />

fomes<br />

Xylocarpus<br />

mekongensis<br />

Brugeria<br />

gymnorhiza<br />

- - <strong>11</strong>3.43 23.12 539.85 81.58 157.22 35.18<br />

- - 135.91 34.65 156.09 35.28 160.72 39.15<br />

52.50 19.09 78.40 29.31 87.65 31.91 89.72 29.41<br />

97


Reclamation and management of coastal saline soils <strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

Paddy-cum-fish cultivation in kharif Cultivation of rice and cotton in rabi / summer<br />

Paradeep (Orissa)<br />

<strong>Soil</strong> and crops<br />

Fig. 47: <strong>Soil</strong> salinity and pH at different land<br />

situation during dry period (May)<br />

Agroforestry can be practiced on coastal<br />

waterlogged lowlands with appropriate<br />

land shaping. The best suited trees under<br />

the situation were: Eucalyptus sps., Acacia<br />

auriculiformis and Casuarina sps.<br />

Assessment of Salt Affected <strong>Soil</strong>s and Cropping<br />

Pattern of Coastal West Bengal, Orissa and<br />

Andhra Pradesh (S. K. Sarangi, K. K. Mahanta,<br />

Subhasis Mandal and B. Maji)<br />

The project was initiated with an objective to<br />

study the soil salinity problems and cropping<br />

pattern followed in the coastal states of West<br />

Bengal, Orissa and Andhra Pradesh with special<br />

reference to the areas near the major ports of<br />

the respective states viz; Haldia, Paradeep and<br />

Visakhapatnam. Information on soil and water<br />

salinity, cropping etc. colleted from the villages<br />

near Paradeep (Orissa) and Haldia (West Bengal)<br />

are summarized below:<br />

Saline soils are found in the Ersama and Kujanga<br />

blocks in the district of Jagatsinghpur of Orissa.<br />

The soils are deep to very deep, mostly well<br />

drained except poorly drained in some areas<br />

with shallow water table, sandy to fine loamy,<br />

moderate to strong saline with acidic to neutral<br />

pH. The farming community is mostly dominated<br />

by marginal farmers (average holding size 1.2<br />

ha). Rice is the main crop with rice-fallow, rice–<br />

green gram and rice–rice cropping pattern. Rice–<br />

fallow is covering majority of the area. Rice–rice<br />

is followed in few areas where there is canal<br />

irrigation facility, however, the area under this<br />

cropping system is very less. Rice–green gram<br />

is followed in the areas where the soil salinity<br />

problem is moderate and life saving irrigation<br />

for this crop is provided from canal.<br />

Rice varieties grown<br />

Farmers mainly grow local salt tolerant rice<br />

varieties as well as high yielding salt tolerant<br />

varieties released by <strong>Central</strong> Rice <strong>Research</strong><br />

Institute, Cuttack. The local varieties are late<br />

maturing (6-7 months) and grain quality is bold<br />

(Table 73).<br />

Indigenous salinity control measures<br />

Following practices were followed by the<br />

farmers to reduce the effect of soil salinity on<br />

rice crop.<br />

98


<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

Reclamation and management of coastal saline soils<br />

Table 73 : Rice varieties grown in the salt affected soils of Paradeep area<br />

Village<br />

Local<br />

Rice varieties grown<br />

High yielding varieties<br />

Nimakana<br />

Harisankar, Basumati, Gudumati, Chaka Akhi,<br />

Baragali, Kadala Gaura, Betanasi<br />

Varsha Dhan, Gayatri (CR 1018),<br />

Puja, Swarna<br />

Badilo Baula pakhia, Kalamula, Matia, Budha manda CR 1590, Gayatri, Lunishree<br />

Saraba Raspanjar, Malabati, Basupati, Bhaluki Masuri, CR 1009, Durga<br />

Sandhapur<br />

Machhakanta, Basupati, Kaidisola, Bhundi,<br />

Pagnigola, Benambari<br />

Mahalaxmi, Swarna, Masuri, Puja,<br />

CR 1009, CR 1018, Durga, Sonamani<br />

distribution of rainfall which includes occurrence<br />

of drought after sowing of the crops or towards<br />

the end of the wet season, heavy rainfall at the<br />

maturity of crop resulting in submergence of the<br />

crop, scarcity of quality irrigation water, nonavailability<br />

of good quality seeds of salt tolerant<br />

varieties of crops etc.<br />

Saline water table at depth of 1 m from surface in<br />

the Saraba village (Ersama block, Jagatsinghpur<br />

district, Orissa) in the month of January<br />

Application of tamarind (Tamarindus indica)<br />

leaf manure<br />

The dried tamarind leaves are collected from<br />

the base of the plant which are accumulated<br />

after senescence and put in the cow dung pit<br />

for decomposition. The decomposed manure is<br />

applied in the field after primary tillage.<br />

Green manuring of horse gram (Macrotyloma<br />

uniflorum)<br />

Locally called Kolatha, a hardy leguminous<br />

plant with twining branches is sown in the first<br />

week of June and allowed to grow till July and<br />

ploughed back into the soil.<br />

Constraints to crop cultivation<br />

The major constraints apart from salinity for<br />

successful crop cultivation in the salt affected<br />

areas near Paradeep are: erratic and uneven<br />

The scope to increase the cropping intensity and<br />

crop production in the area largely depends<br />

onthe management of soil salinity, saving<br />

of water for irrigation, selection of suitable<br />

cropping and nutrient management systems<br />

involving salt tolerant varieties of crops. With<br />

proper water management, it may be possible<br />

to include pulses, oilseeds and vegetables in the<br />

rice-based crop production system during the<br />

dry season.<br />

Contingent cropping<br />

Many times there is failure or very poor yield of<br />

rice crop due to build-up of salinity, particularly<br />

during the year of insufficient or erratic rainfall<br />

resulting in poor washing out of the salts<br />

deposited in the root zone of the crops. In these<br />

situation, crops like bitter gourd, amaranthus,<br />

radish and basella (locally called poi) are grown.<br />

These crops are cultivated in small basins,<br />

created in the patches in the failed rice field,<br />

which later on cover a major portion of the area.<br />

The crops, which are less water requiring, short<br />

duration and having salt tolerance are grown<br />

with application of farm yard manure in the<br />

root zone before sowing of seeds in the basins.<br />

99


Reclamation and management of coastal saline soils <strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

Contingent crop cultivated in the saline soil in the<br />

Sandhapur village (Kujanga block, Jagatsinghpur<br />

district, Orissa)<br />

Haldia (West Bengal)<br />

<strong>Soil</strong> and crops<br />

The area is surrounded by the rivers Hugly<br />

(Rupnarayan) and Haldi, the former carries<br />

relatively sweet water while the later brings saline<br />

water to the region through two canals locally<br />

called Jamunetri and Gangotri, which also drains<br />

the area. However, the area is poorly drained and<br />

soil is characterized by silty clay texture, slight to<br />

moderate saline with acidic to neutral pH, slow<br />

permeability, suitable for rice cultivation with<br />

water table at around 10 m from the ground level.<br />

The farming community is mostly dominated<br />

by small and marginal farmers. Rice is the main<br />

crop during kharif season, of which around 60 per<br />

cent area is under HYVs, while rest is under local<br />

varieties. During rabi season, the main crops are<br />

rice, lathyrus, vegetables, potato and sunflower.<br />

Crops like coconut, betelvine etc. are found in<br />

few patches.<br />

Rice varieties grown<br />

High yielding as well as local traditional varieties<br />

of rice are grown depending upon the depth<br />

of water and type of land. In the waterlogged<br />

land, local varieties viz; Khairsal, Pani Kalas ,<br />

Paloi, Patnai, NC Kalam etc. are grown. The local<br />

fine grain rice variety Dudheswar is grown in<br />

medium land along with HYVs like MTU 7029,<br />

Sabita, Swarnamayee, Swarnashree, IR 36,<br />

Geetanjali, Ranjit etc.<br />

Constraints to crop cultivation<br />

Drainage during heavy rains is a serious problem<br />

and there is ingress of saline seawater through<br />

Haldi river making the land saline. There is lack<br />

<strong>Soil</strong> profile studied during the month of March 20<strong>11</strong><br />

at Haldia (West Bengal)<br />

of irrigation facility during rabi/summer season<br />

in many villages resulting in monocropping<br />

of rice during kharif season only. As the area<br />

is situated nearest to the industrial area so the<br />

labour cost is very high making is difficult to get<br />

labour for agricultural purpose.<br />

Saline soils are found in the Ersama<br />

and Kujanga blocks in the district of<br />

Jagatsinghpur. The soils are deep to very deep,<br />

mostly well drained with shallow water table<br />

(about 1.0 m), sandy to fine loamy, moderate<br />

to strong saline with acidic to neutral pH.<br />

The soils at Haldia and Mahishadal blocks<br />

under East Midnapore were mostly poorly<br />

drained, having slow permeability, medium<br />

to heavy in texture, slight to moderate saline<br />

with acidic to neutral pH, suitable for rice<br />

cultivation and the water table, on an average,<br />

depth of 10.0 m from ground<br />

Exploration of Artificial Groundwater<br />

Recharge of Fresh Water Aquifers in Coastal<br />

Regions of West Bengal (K.K. Mahanta, S.K.<br />

Kamra, S. Kumar and D. Burman)<br />

In coastal region of West Bengal, the rainwater is<br />

in excess than the crop demand in the monsoon<br />

period and remains ponded on the surface,<br />

mostly in cropped paddy fields, reducing the<br />

productivity of the lands. In the remaining part<br />

of the year, the rainfall is erratic and inadequate<br />

to meet the evapotranspiration of the crops.<br />

100


<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

Reclamation and management of coastal saline soils<br />

Fresh water scarcity in the non-monsoon period<br />

is the major problem of the area. Shallow tube<br />

wells were installed since almost a decade and<br />

ground water was exploited for increasing the<br />

cropping intensity. The over exploitation of<br />

ground water has affected the functioning of<br />

the tube wells due to depletion of the water<br />

table and also deteriorated the water quality.<br />

Therefore, artificial recharge to fresh water<br />

aquifers is required.<br />

From the data collected from primary and<br />

secondary sources, it was found that some parts<br />

of South 24 Parganas districts are conducive for<br />

artificial recharge. Three villages in this district<br />

namely Andharia, Chandkhali and Bahirsona<br />

were surveyed regarding installation of shallow<br />

tube wells and utilization of groundwater.<br />

Mostly, the high water requiring crop i.e. paddy<br />

is cultivated utilizing the groundwater. The<br />

groundwater from the shallow tube wells were<br />

tested and found that the salinity increased in<br />

the summer. The fresh water aquifer, which is<br />

exploited by the shallow tube wells, was in the<br />

range 90-120 m and is of better quality than the<br />

shallow tube wells in the range 72-90 m. The<br />

diameter of the tube wells varied from 62.5 mm<br />

and 75 mm. The design of the filter chamber<br />

for artificial recharge to fresh water aquifers is<br />

given in Fig. 48.<br />

Fig. 48 : The design of the filter for artificial recharge<br />

through tube well<br />

Socio-economic Impact of Improved<br />

Technologies in the Coastal Areas of West<br />

Bengal (Subhasis Mandal, S.K. Sarangi, D.<br />

Burman and B.K. Bandyopadhyay)<br />

Coastal agriculture is commonly characterized<br />

by complex, risk prone and fragile ecosystem.<br />

Efforts are being made to improve the<br />

productivity of farming systems in the coastal<br />

region. This project envisaged to analyse the<br />

socio-economic impact of some key technologies<br />

or best management practices that are being<br />

tried under farmers’ field condition. The project<br />

was initiated during 2009-10 in coastal areas<br />

of Sundarbans (West Bengal). Site selection<br />

has been done and baseline information was<br />

collected from the adopters and non-adopters of<br />

improved technologies as promoted by <strong>CSSRI</strong>,<br />

RRS Canning Town. Major technologies targeted<br />

for socio-economic study are various land<br />

shaping technologies such as farm pond, ridge<br />

& furrow and paddy-cum-fish and adoption of<br />

improved rice varieties both in kharif and rabi<br />

season. The economics of dominating farming<br />

systems have been analysed and database on<br />

socio-economic condition of farmers are being<br />

analysed.<br />

The baseline information indicated that majority<br />

of farmers (85%) in the study area were belonging<br />

to weaker section of the society (primarily SC)<br />

and 94 percent of the farmers were marginal<br />

land-holders, rest were small-farmers (1.7 %) and<br />

landless (4.1 %). The land situation is primarily<br />

dominated by low lying (76%) followed by<br />

medium (15%) and upland (9%). Despite having<br />

low return, agriculture was the main occupation<br />

and nearly 42 per cent of the farm families were<br />

primarily dependent on agriculture. In absence<br />

of gainful livelihood options in the local area,<br />

migration to nearby cities is quite prevalent (32%<br />

of farm families) in the study area for search<br />

of alternative livelihood options. Cropping<br />

intensity in the study area was calculated to be<br />

quite low at 120-125 per cent and the cropping<br />

pattern was dominated by the kharif paddy.<br />

Major cropping systems prevailing in the study<br />

area were rice-fallow or rice-rice. The proposed<br />

technological interventions are envisaged to<br />

enhance the cropping intensity as well as farm<br />

income through creation of water resources by<br />

harvesting and storing of rainwater at farm level<br />

Majority of farmers (85%) in the study area<br />

belonged to weaker section of the society<br />

(primarily SC) and 94 percent of the farmers<br />

were marginal land holders, rest were<br />

small and landless. The land situation is<br />

primarily dominated by low-lying followed<br />

by medium and upland<br />

101


Reclamation and management of coastal saline soils <strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

and through promotion of integrated cropping<br />

systems like rice–rice + vegetables and rice +<br />

vegetables– rice + vegetables.<br />

Evaluation of Rice Varieties for Coastal Saline<br />

<strong>Soil</strong>s (S.K. Sarangi, A.R. Bal and B. Maji)<br />

Evaluation of varieties/lines for rabi season<br />

During rabi 2009-10, a set of 31 varieties/lines was<br />

transplanted on 17 th February, <strong>2010</strong>. The yield of<br />

the entries is given in Table 74. Out of these, IR<br />

30864, CSR 39 and CSRC (S) 47-B-1-1 produced<br />

grain yields of 5.93, 5.85, 5.61 t ha -1 , respectively.<br />

Maintenance and evaluation of rice germplasm/<br />

varieties for low land ecosystem<br />

During kharif <strong>2010</strong>, seventy two rice germplasm/<br />

varieties/lines released/developed by <strong>CSSRI</strong>,<br />

Karnal, IRRI and <strong>CSSRI</strong>, RRS, Canning were<br />

evaluated in a replicated trial under saline stress<br />

condition (ECe: 5.2 dS m -1 ). The result revealed<br />

that highest grain yield was obtained from IR<br />

76393-28-7-1-1-3-1 (4.59 t ha -1 ), followed by Amal<br />

Mana (3.74 t ha -1 ) and CSR 4 (3.56 t ha -1 ).<br />

Maintenance and evaluation of rice germplasm/<br />

varieties for semi-deep and deep water<br />

ecosystem<br />

Promising local rice germplasm along with<br />

released varieties from <strong>CSSRI</strong>, RRS, Canning<br />

and RRS, Chinsurah for semi-deep and deep<br />

water situations were maintained and evaluated<br />

during the kharif season-<strong>2010</strong> (Table 75). Out of<br />

twenty one rice varieties/ lines/germplasm<br />

evaluated, CSRC(D) 13-16-9 produced highest<br />

grain yield of 2.33 t ha -1 , followed by CSRC (D)<br />

7-0-4 (2.26 t ha -1 ) and CSRC (D) 12-8-12 (2.24 t<br />

ha -1 ).<br />

The promising lines of rice under coastal<br />

saline soil condition were: IR 30864, IR<br />

76393 - 28-7-1-1-3-1 and CSRC(D) 13-16-9 for<br />

rabi season, low land and semi-deep water<br />

situation, respectively<br />

Stress Tolerant Rice for Coastal soil (<strong>CSSRI</strong>,<br />

RRS, Canning Town) (B.K. Bandyopadhyay,<br />

D. Burman, A.R. Bal, S.K. Sarangi and Subhasis<br />

Mandal)<br />

A participatory research programme was<br />

undertaken under Bill and Melinda Gates<br />

Foundation (BMGF) in collaboration with<br />

IRRI, Philippines to increase the productivity<br />

of rice under salinity stress for poor farming<br />

communities of coastal region. The major thrust<br />

was to identify most suitable varieties/lines<br />

of rice along with their management practices<br />

Table 74 : Rice varieties/lines for rabi season<br />

Sr.<br />

No.<br />

Variety<br />

Grain yield<br />

(t ha -1 )<br />

Sr. No.<br />

Variety<br />

Grain yield<br />

(t ha -1 )<br />

1 CSR23 2.52 17 CSRC(S)50-B-B-B-3-3 5.25<br />

2 CSR27 2.71 18 IR30864 5.93<br />

3 CSR29 3.04 19 PUSA NR580-6 5.52<br />

4 CSR31 2.53 20 CSRC(S)33-9-B-B-3-3 3.55<br />

5 CSR32 2.87 21 CSRC(S)39-B-1-B-3-3 5.12<br />

6 CSR33 3.67 22 CSRC(S)50-2-1-1-4-B 4.50<br />

7 CSR34 4.<strong>11</strong> 23 CSRC(S)49-B-B-B-3-3 3.28<br />

8 CSR35 4.35 24 CSRC(S)53-B-1-B-1 4.87<br />

9 CSR36 2.88 25 CSRC(S)47-7-B-B-1-1 5.12<br />

10 CSR39 5.85 26 RP2525-124-98-3 5.02<br />

<strong>11</strong> IR10206-29-2-1-1 4.35 27 IR77664-B-25-1-2-3-12 5.19<br />

12 IR52280-<strong>11</strong>7-1-1-3 5.62 28 IR75395-23-B-19-B-2-1-B 4.92<br />

13 CANNING-7 4.62 29 IR7634646-B-B-10-1-1-1 5.56<br />

14 CSR-4 5.06 30 IR76393-28-7-1-1-3-1 5.51<br />

15 CSRC(S)32-B-B-B-3-3 5.31 31 CSRC(S)47-B-1-1 5.61<br />

16 CSRC(S)36-B-B-B-2-B 4.69<br />

102


<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

Reclamation and management of coastal saline soils<br />

Varietal trial of rice during rabi season for coastal areas<br />

Promising rice varieties/lines for coastal low land ecosystem<br />

Table 75 : Rice germplasm/varieties/lines tested under semi-deep and deep water ecosystem<br />

Sr.<br />

No.<br />

Entries<br />

Grain yield<br />

(t ha -1 )<br />

Sr. No.<br />

Entries<br />

Grain yield<br />

(t ha -1 )<br />

1 Gavir Saru 1.88 12 CSRC(D) 5-2-2-2 1.72<br />

2 NC 678 1.16 13 Sada Mota Selection 0.92<br />

3 Asfal 0.92 14 Najani 1.72<br />

4 C 300 BD-50-<strong>11</strong> 2.04 15 Tilak Kanchari 1.81<br />

5 CSRC(D) 2-17-5 1.99 16 Manaswarabar 0.81<br />

6 CSRC(D) 2-0-8 1.92 17 Nalini 2.04<br />

7 CSRC(D) 7-5-4 1.99 18 Ambika 1.74<br />

8 CSRC(D) 12-8-12 2.24 19 Purnendu 2.08<br />

9 CSRC(D) 13-16-9 2.33 20 Dinesh 1.27<br />

10 CSRC(D) 7-12-1 2.12 21 Patnai 23 1.25<br />

<strong>11</strong> CSRC(D) 7-0-4 2.26<br />

through Participatory Varietal Selection (PVS)<br />

thereby enabling the poor farmers of the eastern<br />

coastal areas of the country to grow more food,<br />

generate more income, and to reduce poverty<br />

and hunger.<br />

Participatory Varietal Selection (PVS) trials in<br />

rabi/summer season<br />

During rabi/summer season, five Mother trials<br />

(1 on-station and 4 on-farm) at <strong>CSSRI</strong>, RRS,<br />

Canning Town and villages of Chandkhali,<br />

103


Reclamation and management of coastal saline soils <strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

Nikarighata and Nimpith of South 24 Parganas<br />

district and at village Sandeshkhali of North<br />

24 Parganas district of West Bengal, India in<br />

the coastal Sunderbans region were conducted<br />

under this project. Rice varieties/lines<br />

viz;Bidhan 2, Canning 7, Annada, Lalat, Rasi<br />

(IET 1444), Super minikit, Boby and Sankar<br />

Saru were included in the trial. The Preferential<br />

Analysis (PA) was conducted at both on-station<br />

and on-farm situation involving both male and<br />

female farmers. The results of PA revealed that<br />

Bidhan 2 was the most preferred rice variety of<br />

the farmers at both the situations at all locations.<br />

However, the 2 nd most preferred rice varieties<br />

varied at different locations and it was Annada<br />

at <strong>CSSRI</strong>, RRS, Canning Town and Nimpith,<br />

Canning 7 at Chandkhali & Sandeshkhali, and<br />

Boby at Nikarighata. In PA, Lalat and Super<br />

minikit emerged as least preferred varieties.<br />

Farmers’ did not prefer these 2 varieties because<br />

of the traits like, less tolerant to salinity, very tall<br />

plants, comparatively more maturity duration,<br />

less grain weight, short panicle length and low<br />

yield. The grain yield of different varieties of<br />

rice at different locations is given in Table 76.<br />

A total of 20 trials managed by farmers (Baby<br />

trials) were conducted in rabi/summer season in<br />

the salt affected coastal villages of Chandkhali,<br />

Nikarighata, Dumki and Nimpith. For Baby<br />

trials, each farmer were given 3 elite varieties/<br />

lines of rice, which emerged as most preferred<br />

varieties from the Mother trials conducted in<br />

the previous year. The varieties/lines, which<br />

were included in the Baby trial, are Bidhan 2,<br />

Canning 7 and Lalminikit.<br />

The results showed that the variation in grain<br />

yield under Baby trials is mainly due to the<br />

difference in management practices adopted<br />

by the farmers (Table 77). Farmers who applied<br />

recommended dose of fertilizers received higher<br />

grain yield of rice compared to the farmers<br />

who applied less than recommended dose of<br />

fertilizer.<br />

Participation of farmers of village Chandkhali in<br />

Lalminikit 2.63 – 4.50<br />

preferential analysis<br />

Table 76 : Grain yield of rice entries/varieties in PVS Mother trials (rabi/summer season 2009-10)<br />

Name of the<br />

variety<br />

Table 77 : The grain yield of rice varieties under<br />

baby trials<br />

Variety Grain yield (t ha -1 )<br />

Canning 7 2.80 - 4.69<br />

Bidhan 2 2.79- 4.35<br />

Grain yield (t ha -1 )<br />

Chandkhali Nikarighata <strong>CSSRI</strong> Nimpith Sandeshkhali<br />

Canning-7 3.00 4.05 3.70 3.52 3.96<br />

Bidhan-2 4.76 4.64 3.94 3.<strong>11</strong> 3.44<br />

Lalat 1.78 4.29 3.70 3.23 3.17<br />

Superminiket 3.33 3.82 3.47 3.17 3.08<br />

Sankar saru 2.85 4.00 3.24 3.82 3.12<br />

Annada 4.85 4.35 3.93 3.56 3.33<br />

Rashi 3.89 4.05 4.16 3.35 3.41<br />

Boby - 4.10 3.70 - 3.21<br />

Lalminikit 2.94 - - - 3.26<br />

104


<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

Reclamation and management of coastal saline soils<br />

Participatory Varietal Selection (PVS) trials in<br />

kharif (wet) season<br />

During Kharif season, five Mother trials<br />

including one on-station and four on-farm at<br />

villages of Chandkhali, Korakati, Nikarighata of<br />

South 24 Parganas district and Sandeshkhali of<br />

North 24 Parganas district of West Bengal in the<br />

salt affected coastal region of Sundarbans were<br />

conducted under this project. Rice varieties/<br />

lines viz;Sabita, SR 26 B, Amal Mana, Geetanjali,<br />

CN 1039-9, CN 1233-33-9, CSRC (S) 21-2-5-B-1-1,<br />

Manasarobar, NC 678 and CSRC (D) 7-0-4 were<br />

included in the trials. Preferential Analysis (PA)<br />

was conducted for the Mother trials during wet<br />

season. Amal Mana and Geetanjali emerged as<br />

2 most preferred rice varieties. These varieties<br />

were preferred most by the farmers due to their<br />

traits like tolerance to salinity, tall plant type,<br />

more tillers, suitable for both medium and low<br />

land condition, long and compact panicles with<br />

more grains, no/minimum infestation of pest<br />

and diseases, good grain types, enough straw<br />

for fodder/thatching/fuel, optimum maturity<br />

period, expected high yield, etc. CN 1233-33-9<br />

and CN 1039-9 emerged as least preferred<br />

variety in the Preferential Analysis. Farmers did<br />

not prefer these 2 varieties because of traits like<br />

short plant height, non-suitability for low lying<br />

areas, less number of tillers, short panicle length,<br />

and expected lower yields. The results revealed<br />

that the highest grain yield of 5.20 and 4.89 t ha -1<br />

were produced by Geetanjali and Amal Mana,<br />

respectively, while the lowest yield of 2.33 t ha -1<br />

was produced by NC 678 (Table 78).<br />

Forty five trials (Baby trials) were conducted by<br />

farmers in wet season in the salt affected coastal<br />

villages of Chandkhali, Andharia, Dumki,<br />

Nikarighata, Korakati and Sandeshkhali.<br />

For baby trials, each farmer was given 3 elite<br />

varieties/lines of rice, which emerged as the<br />

most preferred varieties from the Mother trials<br />

conducted in the previous year. The varieties/<br />

lines, which were included in the baby trials<br />

were SR 26 B, Geetanjali and Amal Mana.<br />

Baby trial conducted at village Chandkhali during<br />

kharif season<br />

Table 78 : Grain yield of rice entries/varieties in Mother trials<br />

Variety<br />

Grain yield (t ha -1 )<br />

Korakati Sandeshkhali Chandkhali Canning farm<br />

Sabita 4.29 4.50 3.43 3.70<br />

SR 26B 4.14 4.63 4.24 3.23<br />

Manasarabor 4.29 4.00 4.40 3.91<br />

Amal Mana 4.89 4.33 4.50 3.68<br />

CSRC (S) 21-2-5-B-1-5 3.83 4.28 4.27 3.43<br />

CSRC (D) 7-0-4 4.00 3.43 4.33 3.83<br />

CN 1039-9 3.86 3.88 3.73 3.23<br />

CN 12133-3-9 3.71 3.50 3.93 3.15<br />

NC 678 3.86 4.25 2.33 3.53<br />

Geetanjali 5.20 4.80 4.41 3.92<br />

105


Reclamation and management of coastal saline soils <strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

Sensory evaluation<br />

Sensory evaluation was conducted in<br />

participatory mode to analyze the cooking and<br />

eating quality of the top preferred varieties<br />

selected from the preference analysis tested<br />

under researcher-managed trial in rabi/summer<br />

season (2009-10). Farmers’ most preferred<br />

varieties/line Bidhan 2, Boby and Annada<br />

were included for sensory analysis. Farmers<br />

ranked the rice varieties based on the cooking<br />

and eating quality like aroma, colour, flavour,<br />

glossiness, tenderness, cohesiveness, taste,<br />

etc. The farmer’s most preferred rice variety/<br />

line was Boby followed by Bidhan 2 and least<br />

preferred one was Annada. Softness, white color,<br />

pleasant flavour, shiningness, non-cohesiveness<br />

were the major reasons of the farmers to prefer<br />

Boby as best cooked rice.<br />

Under farmers’ selection in participatory<br />

mode, varieties Gitanjali and Amal Mana in<br />

kharif and Bidhan 2 and Canning 7 in rabi<br />

were the best rice varieties under salt stress<br />

condition of coastal region.<br />

Strategies for Sustainable Management<br />

of Degraded Coastal Land and Water for<br />

Enhancing Livelihood Security of Farming<br />

Communities (B.K. Bandyopadhyay, D.<br />

Burman, A.R. Bal, S.K. Sarangi, S. Mandal, K. K.<br />

Mahanta and S.K. Gupta)<br />

The coastal region of the Country is traditionally<br />

disadvantaged and backward with low<br />

livelihood security of the farmers. The region<br />

is vulnerable to degradation due to climate<br />

changes. The degraded soil and water quality,<br />

together with climatic adversities contribute to<br />

the poor livelihood security and low agricultural<br />

productivity. The project was implemented<br />

in a Public-Private consortia mode involving<br />

5 reputed institutions viz;<strong>CSSRI</strong>, Regional<br />

<strong>Research</strong> Station, Canning Town (Lead Center),<br />

Ramkrishna Ashram Krishi Vigyan Kendra<br />

(RAKVK), Nimpith (NGO), <strong>Central</strong> Institute of<br />

Brackishwater Aquaculture, Kakdwip <strong>Research</strong><br />

Centre, Kakdwip, <strong>Central</strong> Agricultural <strong>Research</strong><br />

Institute, Port Blair and Bidhan Chandra Krishi<br />

Viswavidyalaya, Mohanpur.<br />

The operational area of the project were<br />

disadvantageous areas of Sundarbans (South<br />

24 Parganas and North 24 Parganas districts<br />

of West Bengal) and Tsunami affected areas<br />

of Andaman and Nicobor Islands (South<br />

Andaman and North and Middle Andaman<br />

districts). The project sites comprised of 10<br />

clusters spread over 29 villages and covering<br />

<strong>11</strong>629 farm households. The baseline survey<br />

results of the project sites indicated that<br />

clusters in Sundarbans area are dominated by<br />

backward population (particularly SC 18-84%).<br />

In A and N Island, the population was mainly<br />

dominated by the OBCs category. Agricultural<br />

operational lands in Sundarbans of West Bengal<br />

is highly fragmented and the average holding<br />

size of farmers was in the range of 0.19 – 0.56 ha,<br />

dominated by marginal farmers (> 90 %) and<br />

land with low lying conditions (> 80%).<br />

Various technological interventions of<br />

agriculture, animal husbandry and integrated<br />

farming systems were implemented on farmers’<br />

fields in 10 clusters of the project areas. Land<br />

shaping was highly acceptable to the farmers of<br />

the area. The different land shaping techniques<br />

viz; farm pond, deep furrow & high ridge,<br />

Shallow furrow & medium ridge and paddycum-fish<br />

culture was created on an area of<br />

29.215 ha during the year, which created 123830<br />

m 3 of irrigation resource (through rain water<br />

harvesting), converted the area from monocropped<br />

to multi-cropped with integrated crop<br />

and fish cultivation and created employment<br />

for 13150 number of person. New crops and<br />

improved crop varieties were introduced in 120.6<br />

Deep furrow and high ridge: a land shaping<br />

technique implemented at farmers’ field<br />

106


<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

Reclamation and management of coastal saline soils<br />

ha area. About 2400 farmers including women<br />

farmers were trained on various aspects of<br />

agriculture, fisheries and livestock management<br />

and other livelihood improvement options.<br />

Sustainability funds have been created at all the<br />

cluster levels to ensure continued technological<br />

upgrading and hand holding of the beneficiary<br />

farmers and also attempting horizontal spread<br />

of the technological interventions.<br />

Estimating Marketing Efficiency of Major<br />

Horticultural Commodities in Coastal Districts<br />

of West Bengal (Subhasis Mandal, S.K. Sarangi,<br />

D. Burman and B.K. Bandyopadhyay)<br />

ICAR in collaboration with NCAP and several<br />

research institutes and SAUs of the Country<br />

have undertaken this network project including<br />

<strong>CSSRI</strong>, RRS, Canning Town, as one of the<br />

partners for studies in coastal districts of West<br />

Bengal.<br />

Constraint analysis in marketing of produce<br />

by farmers as well as middlemen was under<br />

taken through computing Garrett ranking of<br />

various constraints. Detailed discussions were<br />

held with the farmers and list of important<br />

constraints was prepared. Individually, farmers<br />

were asked to rank these constraints. Based on<br />

this rank, finally, Garrett rank was computed to<br />

prioritize the constraints faced by the farmers.<br />

Same procedure was followed for identification<br />

and prioritization of constraints in marketing of<br />

agricultural produce, faced by middleman also.<br />

The constraints analysis indicated that high<br />

cost of production (due to escalation of input<br />

cost) is the most important constraint faced by<br />

the farmers to enhance their production and<br />

in turn the marketable surplus of the produce.<br />

Poor transportation facilities, occasional market<br />

glut situation during peak season, lack of<br />

remunerative price (very often) and intra-day<br />

price variation (price uncertainty) were the other<br />

most important constraints faced by the farmers<br />

in marketing of their produce. Establishing<br />

better market linkages between farmers would<br />

promote marketing margins substantially. Due<br />

to these constraints most of the production area<br />

is skewed to 5-6 km radius of the market yard<br />

only, even though the favourable conditions for<br />

growing these commodities prevail in other areas<br />

also. Other important constraints encountered<br />

by the farmers are lack of knowledge of grading<br />

and sorting, presence of exploitative middlemen,<br />

delay in payment, scarcity of labour, difficulty<br />

in selling produce with relatively lower quality,<br />

lack of adequate cold storage facilities, lack of<br />

technical know-how and lack of awareness<br />

on crop insurance. Large investments from<br />

corporate houses on value addition to the<br />

agricultural produce are still awaited in the<br />

state, which would probably be beneficial for<br />

both producers and consumers.<br />

Growing fruits and vegetables in the study area<br />

is gradually gaining its popularity. To promote<br />

this, there is a need to free and fair functioning of<br />

all market functionaries. Efficiency of marketing<br />

of selected commodities can be increased<br />

significantly with certain intervention such as<br />

1) up-scaling of volume of produce handled,<br />

either through increase in production or through<br />

formation of self-help groups or formation of<br />

grower’s association so that farmers’ marketing<br />

cost reduces. 2) Providing market intelligence<br />

support to the farmers particularly on the time<br />

to grow certain crops and making availability<br />

of suitable seed/variety for crops. 3) Basic<br />

infrastructure in the market yard should be<br />

improved so that interaction between farmers<br />

and traders can be freely made. 4) Government<br />

regulation should be enforced for free and<br />

fair marketing practices and free entry of a<br />

number of organized retailers in the market.<br />

Implementation of Agricultural Produce and<br />

Marketing Act (APMC Act) would be one of<br />

the options for better, free and fair marketing<br />

practices provided organized retailers are<br />

Training of farm women on mushroom cultivation<br />

107


Reclamation and management of coastal saline soils <strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

allowed to purchase produce directly from<br />

farmers across the districts. 5) Appropriate price<br />

discovery of the produce in the market was the<br />

most important issue to facilitate improved<br />

marketing efficiency and providing farmers<br />

a better deal. Finally, based on the discussion<br />

with various market functionaries, it has been<br />

concluded that to make a marketing model<br />

successful, it must ensure the three components<br />

like offering best price, providing insurance<br />

cover and making availability of technical<br />

know-how.<br />

Enhancing and Stabilizing the Productivity of<br />

Salt Affected Areas by Incorporating Genes for<br />

tolerance of Abiotic Stress in Rice: BMZ Project<br />

(B.K. Bandyopadhyay, D.Burman, A.R.Bal, S.K.<br />

Sarangi and Subhasis Mandal)<br />

In this project, rice varieties incorporated with<br />

salt tolerant gene ‘saltol’ are being evaluated.<br />

Thirty six entries of rice (BMZ 1, BMZ 2, BMZ<br />

3, BMZ 4, BMZ 5, BMZ 6, BMZ 7, BMZ 8, BMZ<br />

9, BMZ 10, BMZ <strong>11</strong>, BMZ 12, BMZ 13, BMZ 14,<br />

BMZ 15, BMZ 16, BMZ 17, BMZ 18, BMZ 19,<br />

BMZ 20, BMZ 21, BMZ 22, BMZ 23, BMZ 24,<br />

BMZ 25, BMZ 26, BMZ 27, BMZ 28, BMZ 29,<br />

BMZ 30, BMZ 31, VSR 156, CSR 27, CSR 36, IR<br />

29, FL 478, Canning 7 & CST 7-1) besides two<br />

checks from RRS, Canning (Canning 7 and<br />

CST 7-1) were put under trial in two different<br />

salinity conditions one at low salinity (ECe 1.7<br />

dS m -1 ) and other at high salinity (ECe 6.7 dS<br />

m -1 ) during rabi season.<br />

The lines BMZ 7, BMZ 8 and BMZ 19 did not<br />

germinate in the nursery. Though, the line BMZ<br />

12 germinated in the nursery but the flowering<br />

was very late. However, the lines BMZ-1,<br />

BMZ-2, BMZ-3, BMZ-4, BMZ-5, BMZ-6, BMZ 9,<br />

BMZ-<strong>11</strong>, BMZ-12, BMZ-16, BMZ-25 and BMZ-<br />

26 died at vegetative stage under high salinity<br />

condition. The highest grain yield was recorded<br />

from BMZ 2, BMZ 21, BMZ 23, CSR 36, BMZ<br />

28, BMZ 29, FL-478 under low salinity (ECe 1.7<br />

dS m -1 ) condition and the lines BMZ-23, BMZ-<br />

28, BMZ-29, BMZ-31 and Canning 7 performed<br />

better in terms of grain yield under high salinity<br />

condition (ECe 6.7 dS m -1 ).<br />

During kharif <strong>2010</strong>, thirty five entries (BMZ-1,<br />

BMZ-2, BMZ-3, BMZ-4, BMZ-5, BMZ-6, BMZ-9,<br />

BMZ-10, BMZ-<strong>11</strong>, BMZ-12, BMZ-13, BMZ-14,<br />

BMZ-15, BMZ-16, BMZ-17, BMZ-18, BMZ-20,<br />

BMZ-21, BMZ-22, BMZ-23, BMZ-24, BMZ-25,<br />

BMZ-26, BMZ-27, BMZ-28, BMZ-29, BMZ-30,<br />

BMZ-31, VSR-156, CSR-36, CSR-27, CSR-29, FL<br />

478, Canning-7 and CST 7-1) were put under trial<br />

with soil salinity (ECe) of 4.80 dS m -1 . Highest<br />

yield was obtained from BMZ 4 followed by<br />

BMZ 16 and BMZ 28.<br />

<br />

108


<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

AICRP on Management of Salt Affected <strong>Soil</strong>s and Use of Saline<br />

Water in Agriculture<br />

Organic Input Management Options with<br />

Saline Water Irrigation for Sustaining<br />

Productivity of High Value Crops (R.L. Meena<br />

and S.K. Gupta)<br />

Increasing shortage of good quality irrigation<br />

water in arid and semi arid regions of the<br />

country is forcing the farmers to utilize saline<br />

and alkali ground water for irrigation. In order to<br />

ensure their sustainable use in combination with<br />

organic inputs management, a field experiment<br />

was initiated during kharif 2008 at Bir Forest<br />

Experimental Farm, Hisar. Experiment was laid<br />

out in split plot design with two saline water<br />

irrigation (EC iw<br />

7) in main plots and 8<br />

organic input management options in sub-plots.<br />

During kharif 2009, sesame was sown on 14 th July<br />

and harvested on 22 nd October, 2009 and during<br />

rabi 2009 spice crop fennel variety Hisar Swarup<br />

(HF-33) was sown on 31 st October, 2009 and<br />

harvested in four picking upto 13 th May, <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

Initial soil sample from 0-30 cm depth revealed<br />

that EC e<br />

, pH s<br />

, organic carbon and available<br />

nitrogen before the start of the experiment were<br />

0.80-0.86, 8.2-8.5, 0.26 per cent and 98 kg ha -1 ,<br />

respectively.<br />

In sesame, plant height, plants/m, row length,<br />

number of pods per plant differed significantly<br />

with saline water irrigation, while 100 seed weight<br />

and seed yield reduced under high saline water<br />

irrigation. Significant difference in plants/m<br />

row length, number of pods per plant and seed<br />

yield of sesame was observed with organic input<br />

applications as compared to inorganic fertilizer<br />

applications. Highest seed yield (0.28 t ha -1 )<br />

was observed under 100 per cent recommended<br />

doses of organic inputs viz;farm yard manure<br />

+ neem cake manure (Table 79). No significant<br />

difference was observed under inorganic and<br />

organic inputs on pH, EC e<br />

and available nitrogen<br />

and phosphorus, while significantly high organic<br />

carbon (0.36%) was observed with application of<br />

100 per cent recommended doses of all three<br />

Table 79 : Growth, yield attributes and yield of sesame<br />

Treatments<br />

Plant height<br />

(cm)<br />

Plants/m row<br />

length<br />

No. of<br />

pods per<br />

plant<br />

100 seed<br />

weight<br />

(g)<br />

Seed yield<br />

(t ha -1 )<br />

ECiw 7 62.3 3.5 28.5 0.31 0.09<br />

CD (5%) 33.1 1.2 5.9 NS NS<br />

T 1<br />

72.3 3.5 27.2 0.32 0.<strong>11</strong><br />

T 2<br />

83.3 4.3 35.8 0.31 0.15<br />

T 3<br />

101.8 4.7 43.5 0.32 0.18<br />

T 4<br />

83.3 5.0 48.2 0.31 0.17<br />

T 5<br />

88.5 6.2 44.8 0.31 0.16<br />

T 6<br />

89.8 5.3 45.8 0.32 0.21<br />

T 7<br />

94.3 5.7 47.7 0.32 0.28<br />

T 8<br />

90.2 6.7 51.7 0.32 0.25<br />

CD (5%) NS 1.6 13.3 NS 0.01<br />

T 1<br />

-100% Inorganic fertilizer; T 2<br />

- Inorganic + Organic Inputs (50% each); T 3<br />

: FYM + Vermicompost (50:50); T 4<br />

- FYM<br />

+ Non-edible oilcake manure (50:50); T 5<br />

- FYM + Vermicompost+Non-edible neem cake manure (33% each); T 6<br />

-<br />

FYM+Vermicompost (100:100); T 7<br />

- FYM+Non edible neem cake manure (100:100); T 8<br />

- FYM+Vermicompost+Non edible<br />

neem cake manure (66.6% each).<br />

109


AICRP on management of salt affected soils and use of saline water in agriculture<br />

<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

Sesame (a) and Fennel (b) crops under saline water irrigation<br />

organic inputs viz., farm yard manure +<br />

vermicompost + non-edible neem cake manure<br />

(Gronim) (Table 80). Non significant differences<br />

were recorded in umbels per plant, umbellets per<br />

umbel, seed weight per umbel and 100 seed weight<br />

in saline water irrigation while plant height differ<br />

significantly under high salinity irrigation water.<br />

Significant difference in plant height of fennel<br />

was observed with organic input applications.<br />

Highest seed yield (1.21 t ha -1 ) was observed<br />

under 50 per cent recommended doses of organic<br />

inputs viz., farm yard manure + vermicompost<br />

(Table 81). <strong>Soil</strong> analysis at harvest of fennel<br />

showed that there was significant difference in<br />

EC e<br />

and available phosphorus with saline water<br />

irrigation while other parameters were observed<br />

at par. Application of organic inputs showed no<br />

significant difference in EC e<br />

, pH s<br />

and available<br />

nitrogen except organic carbon and available<br />

Sesame responded well to 100 per cent<br />

application of FYM and neem cake manure<br />

and fennel responded well to application of<br />

FYM and vermi compost. These crops could<br />

be cultivated upto 7 dS m -1<br />

Table 80 : <strong>Soil</strong> pH s<br />

, EC e<br />

, OC, available N and P<br />

(0-30 cm) at harvest of sesame<br />

Treatments<br />

EC e<br />

(dS<br />

m -1 )<br />

pH s<br />

OC<br />

(%)<br />

Av.N<br />

(kg ha -1 )<br />

Av. P<br />

(kg ha -1 )<br />

ECiw 7 1.5 8.4 0.26 81.7 27.7<br />

CD (5%) 0.36 NS NS NS NS<br />

T 1<br />

1.1 8.3 0.21 79.4 22.4<br />

T 2<br />

1.4 8.3 0.25 83.3 29.9<br />

T 3<br />

1.1 8.4 0.24 80.7 19.2<br />

T 4<br />

1.2 8.4 0.26 82.0 28.7<br />

T 5<br />

1.6 8.4 0.25 80.3 19.8<br />

T 6<br />

1.5 8.4 0.29 83.0 34.9<br />

T 7<br />

1.5 8.5 0.27 84.3 18.9<br />

T 8<br />

1.2 8.4 0.36 87.8 46.8<br />

CD (5%) NS NS 0.07 NS NS<br />

Table 81 : Growth, yield attributes and yields of fennel under different treatments<br />

Treatments Plant height<br />

(cm)<br />

Umbels<br />

per plant<br />

Umbellets<br />

per umbel<br />

Seed wt.<br />

per umbel<br />

(g)<br />

100 seed<br />

weight<br />

(g)<br />

Seed yield<br />

(t ha -1 )<br />

EC iw<br />

7 98.5 18.6 18.5 1.6 0.62 0.85<br />

CD (5%) 22.8 NS NS NS NS 0.41<br />

T 1<br />

100.0 21.1 18.0 1.3 0.53 0.97<br />

T 2<br />

100.6 16.8 18.5 1.4 0.56 1.01<br />

T 3<br />

<strong>11</strong>0.4 19.6 18.2 1.6 0.62 1.21<br />

T 4<br />

106.1 19.7 18.2 1.5 0.63 1.<strong>11</strong><br />

T 5<br />

105.0 19.8 20.5 1.5 0.60 1.17<br />

T 6<br />

<strong>11</strong>4.0 22.5 21.6 1.8 0.57 0.88<br />

T 7<br />

<strong>11</strong>9.0 20.0 21.0 1.7 0.56 1.05<br />

T 8<br />

122.7 21.6 21.5 1.7 0.60 1.03<br />

CD (5%) 14.3 NS NS NS NS NS<br />

<strong>11</strong>0


<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

AICRP on management of salt affected soils and use of saline water in agriculture<br />

phosphorus. The highest organic carbon content<br />

was observed with all three organic inputs.<br />

Assessment of Treated Sewage Water Quality<br />

and its Effect on Yield of Different Crops at<br />

Farmers’ Fields (Agra Centre)<br />

Treated sewage water was assessed during 2009-<br />

10 at different locations of STP Dandhupura,<br />

district Agra which is being used for irrigating<br />

different vegetables, cereals and pulses. The<br />

sewage water samples of Agra city were collected<br />

at sewage station without primary treatment<br />

(Inlet) before rains, after rains and during winter<br />

season and analysed for different parameters<br />

(Table 82). Concentration of bi-carbonate was<br />

higher before rains while chloride increased after<br />

the rainy season.<br />

The analysis of treated sewage samples at STP<br />

ponds revealed that salinity ranged from 3.4 to<br />

3.7, pH ranged from 7.2 to 7.5, BOD ranged from<br />

30 to 32 mg L -1 . The outlet water had carbonate<br />

after rains while bicarbonate was higher before<br />

rains. Chloride ranged from 69 to 471 mg L -1 .<br />

Nitrate was found in all samples and ranged<br />

from 287 to 340 mg L -1 . The concentration of<br />

other parameters decreased after treatment.<br />

Treated sewage water samples were also collected<br />

at a distance of 1 km from STP and analysis<br />

showed that water have high EC ranging from<br />

3.3 to 4.1, BOD from 14 to 30 mg L -1 , Chloride<br />

content was higher during winter season. Lower<br />

concentration of other parameters were observed<br />

at a distance of one km from the sewage treatment<br />

plant.<br />

Treated sewage water irrigated crops were<br />

compared with fresh ground water (Table 83).<br />

The yield of mustard, wheat and pearl millet<br />

increased by <strong>11</strong>-13 per cent; vegetables by 10-14<br />

per cent. However, yield of other crops increased<br />

by 10-14 per cent due to high organic carbon and<br />

available nitrogen of treated sewage water.<br />

Application of treated sewage water irrigation<br />

increased the yield of mustard, wheat and<br />

pearmillet crops, which is due to increased<br />

organic carbon and available nitrogen of<br />

treated sewage water<br />

Tolerance of Cotton Varieties to Saline Water<br />

under Drip Irrigation System (Bikaner Centre)<br />

In non command areas, tube well is the only<br />

source of irrigation. Groundwater being mostly<br />

saline, productivity is decreasing day by day due<br />

to increasing soil salinity. Cotton is an alternative<br />

crop which can be successfully grown with poor<br />

quality water. Since drip irrigation has added<br />

advantage of using relatively more saline water,<br />

therefore, there is a need to identify suitable<br />

varieties of cotton and optimum irrigation<br />

scheduls under drip irrigation.<br />

It is evident from Table 84 that methods of<br />

irrigation, salinity of irrigation water and varieties<br />

had significant effect on seed cotton yield. Drip<br />

method was found significantly superior to flood<br />

method, seed cotton yield being 44.2 per cent higher<br />

in drip irrigation as compared to flood irrigation.<br />

Seed cotton yield decreased significantly at EC iw<br />

6.0 dS m -1 as compared to canal and saline water<br />

having EC iw<br />

3.0 dS m -1 . However, differences in<br />

seed cotton yield with canal water and saline<br />

water of EC iw<br />

3.0 dS m -1 were not significant.<br />

The variety Bt cotton was found significantly<br />

superior than other varieties. Effect of methods of<br />

irrigation, salinity of irrigation water and varieties<br />

on yield attributes were also found significant.<br />

Plant height, number of bolls/plant and boll<br />

size were significantly higher in drip irrigation<br />

Use of treated sewage water for irrigation in different<br />

crops<br />

Cotton under drip irrigation with saline water<br />

<strong>11</strong>1


AICRP on management of salt affected soils and use of saline water in agriculture<br />

<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

Table 82 : Sewage water analysis at Dhadhupura STP inlet, outlet and 1 km away from STP<br />

Parameter<br />

After<br />

rains<br />

Before treatment After treatment At 1 Km distance from STP<br />

Winter<br />

season<br />

Before<br />

rains<br />

After<br />

rains<br />

Winter<br />

season<br />

Before<br />

rains<br />

After<br />

rains<br />

Winter<br />

season<br />

Before<br />

rains<br />

pH 7.7 6.9 7.4 7.3 7.2 7.5 7.6 7.7 7.2<br />

EC (dS m -1 ) 3.4 3.6 4.7 3.4 3.6 3.7 3.3 4.1 3.7<br />

BOD (mg L -1 ) 204 221 221 30 32 30 15 14 30<br />

COD (mg L -1 ) 483 516 509 <strong>11</strong>8 129 126 58 91 63<br />

CO 3<br />

(mg L -1 ) 30 - - 51 - - 36 45 17<br />

HCO 3<br />

(mg L -1 ) 702 723 995 570 665 702 506 580 467<br />

Chloride (mg L -1 ) 516 60 83 471 208 69 496 189 69<br />

Sulfate (mg L -1 ) 289 792 1456 480 900 <strong>11</strong>42 444 <strong>11</strong>93 1277<br />

Nitrate (mg L -1 ) 405 341 326 340 284 287 206 181 233<br />

Ca (mg L -1 ) 97 92 <strong>11</strong>2 65 82 80 38 46 93<br />

Mg (mg L -1 ) 77 96 100 104 75 98 <strong>11</strong>4 96 92<br />

Na (mg L -1 ) 478 438 457 479 447 432 479 372 322<br />

K (mg L -1 ) 39 36 37 38 36 37 42 35 30<br />

Cu (mg L -1 ) 0.09 0.08 0.04 0.02 0.03 0.02 - - -<br />

Mn (mg L -1 ) 89.7 82.2 104.9 87.9 90.7 97.1 - - -<br />

Zn (mg L -1 ) 0.07 0.07 0.09 0.02 0.02 0.03 - - -<br />

Co (mg L -1 ) 0.01 0.01 0.07 0.02 0.03 0.03 - - -<br />

Fe (mg L -1 ) 0.07 0.04 0.06 0.01 - 0.01 - - -<br />

SAR (mmol L -1 ) ½ 8.8 7.7 7.6 8.5 8.6 7.6 8.7 7.2 6.2<br />

RSC (me L -1 ) 1.3 0.5 2.2 - - - - - -<br />

Table 83 : Effect of treated sewage and fresh ground water irrigation on yield of different crops at farmers<br />

field<br />

Crops<br />

Treated sewage water<br />

irrigated crops yield<br />

(t ha -1 )<br />

Fresh ground water irrigated<br />

crops yield<br />

(t ha -1 )<br />

Yield increase in treated<br />

sewage water irrigation<br />

(%)<br />

Mustard 2.80 2.50 <strong>11</strong><br />

Wheat 4.20 3.80 10<br />

Pearl millet 2.90 2.50 13<br />

Cauliflower 6-10 (mid), 22-25 (late) 4-9 (mid), 16-22 (late) 10 (mid), 12 (late)<br />

Cabbage 7-8 5-7 13<br />

Carrot 22-28 20-24 14<br />

Cowpea 5-8 (green pod), 1-1.5 (grain) 4-7 (green pod), 0.9-1.3 (grain) 13 (green pod), 13 (grain)<br />

Knol-khol 20-25 18-22 12<br />

Onion 24-28 22-24 14<br />

Palak 6-10 4-9 10<br />

Radish 5-7 3-5 14<br />

Spinach 6-8 3-7 13<br />

<strong>11</strong>2


<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

AICRP on management of salt affected soils and use of saline water in agriculture<br />

Table 84 : Seed cotton yield of different varieties under different methods of irrigation and salinity of<br />

irrigation water<br />

Treatments<br />

Seed cotton yield<br />

(t ha -1 )<br />

Plant height<br />

(cm)<br />

No. of bolls/<br />

plant<br />

Boll size<br />

(cm)<br />

2009 <strong>2010</strong> 2009 <strong>2010</strong> 2009 <strong>2010</strong> 2009 <strong>2010</strong><br />

Methods of irrigation<br />

M 1<br />

-Drip 1.86 2.78 149.5 120.1 50.3 67 4.15 3.98<br />

M 2<br />

-flood 1.29 1.97 107.0 106.8 44.0 58 3.87 3.77<br />

CD (5%) 0.10 0.16 6.2 5.5 2.5 2.9 0.14 0.17<br />

<strong>Salinity</strong> of water<br />

S 1<br />

- 0.25 dS m -1 1.78 3.05 135.5 128.6 54.0 83 4.26 4.30<br />

S 2<br />

- 3.0 dS m -1 1.69 2.35 129.4 <strong>11</strong>7.3 48.0 67 4.<strong>11</strong> 4.15<br />

S 3<br />

- 6.0 dS m -1 1.27 1.73 120.1 94.6 39.0 37 3.66 3.68<br />

CD (5%) 0.12 0.13 7.6 6.8 3.0 3.5 0.17 0.20<br />

Varieties<br />

V 1<br />

- F 846 1.35 1.81 124.3 <strong>11</strong>0.7 46.1 55 4.07 4.<strong>11</strong><br />

V 2<br />

- RST-9 1.46 2.47 133.6 <strong>11</strong>4.3 49.5 64 4.23 4.25<br />

V 3<br />

-RG-8 1.35 2.21 120.2 107.5 41.7 61 3.45 3.47<br />

V 4<br />

- Bt cotton 2.15 3.02 135.3 121.4 51.2 68 4.28 4.30<br />

CD (5%) 0.13 0.19 8.8 7.8 3.5 4.1 0.20 0.26<br />

C.V % 12.7 <strong>11</strong>.8 10.3 10.3 <strong>11</strong>.1 9.7 7.4 7.9<br />

as compared to flood irrigation. Yield attributes<br />

decreased significantly at EC iw<br />

6.0 dS m -1 salinity<br />

of irrigation water as compared to canal water<br />

and saline water having EC iw<br />

3.0 dS m -1 .<br />

Cotton could successfully be grown with<br />

saline water of 3.0 dS m -1 using drip method<br />

of irrigation as compared to flood irrigation<br />

Effect of Amendments and FYM on Vegetables<br />

Irrigated with High RSC Water (Hisar Centre)<br />

Cluster bean<br />

The yield of cluster bean irrigated with sodic<br />

water (RSC=<strong>11</strong>.6 me L -1 ) increased significantly<br />

both with the addition of gypsum and FYM. In<br />

cluster bean, the highest yield of 9.13 t ha -1 was<br />

obtained in F 2<br />

G 2<br />

treatment while the lowest (0.45<br />

t ha -1 ) was in F 0<br />

G 0<br />

treatment (Table 85).<br />

Broccoli<br />

In broccoli, yield increased significantly with the<br />

addition of gypsum and FYM. The highest yield<br />

of 10.7 t ha -1 was recorded in F 2<br />

G 2<br />

treatment and<br />

the lowest (0.33 t ha -1 ) in F 0<br />

G 0<br />

(Table 86).<br />

Okra<br />

The yield of okra irrigated with sodic water<br />

(RSC=<strong>11</strong>.5 me L -1 ) increased significantly with<br />

Table 85 : Effect of FYM and gypsum on yield of<br />

cluster bean (t ha -1 ) under sodic water<br />

irrigation<br />

FYM<br />

G 0<br />

(No gypsum)<br />

Gypsum (% GR)<br />

G 1<br />

(50%)<br />

G 2<br />

(100%)<br />

Mean<br />

F 0<br />

(No FYM) 0.45 4.83 6.06 3.78<br />

F 1<br />

(10 t ha -1 ) 0.73 6.18 8.22 5.05<br />

F 2<br />

(20 t ha -1 ) 0.82 6.96 9.13 5.64<br />

Mean 0.67 5.99 7.80 -<br />

CD (5%) Gypsum = 0.38; FYM = 0.38; G X FYM = 0.65<br />

Table 86 : Effect of FYM and gypsum on yield<br />

of broccoli (t ha -1 ) under sodic water<br />

irrigation<br />

FYM<br />

G 0<br />

(No gypsum)<br />

Gypsum (% GR)<br />

G 1<br />

(50%)<br />

G 2<br />

(100%)<br />

Mean<br />

F 0<br />

(No FYM) 0.33 4.32 5.55 3.40<br />

F 1<br />

(10 t ha -1 ) 1.51 6.25 8.96 5.57<br />

F 2<br />

(20 t ha -1 ) 2.06 9.87 10.70 7.55<br />

Mean 1.30 6.81 8.40 -<br />

CD (5%) Gypsum = 0.28; FYM = 0.28; G x FYM = 0.48<br />

<strong>11</strong>3


AICRP on management of salt affected soils and use of saline water in agriculture<br />

<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

the addition of both gypsum and FYM. However,<br />

the magnitude of increase was higher with<br />

gypsum than FYM. Maximum yield (9.52 t ha -1 )<br />

of okra was obtained in F 2<br />

G 4<br />

treatment. The<br />

yield increased by 18 and 22 percent with F 1<br />

and F 2<br />

as compared to F 0<br />

(Table 87). The mean<br />

yield increased significantly with the addition<br />

of gypsum and it was 2 times higher in G 4<br />

as<br />

compared to G 0<br />

.<br />

Cabbage<br />

The curd weight of cabbage also increased<br />

significantly with the application of gypsum and<br />

FYM (Table 88). The mean yield increased from<br />

17.53 t ha -1 under no gypsum to 25.95 t ha -1 under<br />

100 per cent GR. Maximum yield (27.43 t ha -1 )<br />

was obtained in F 2<br />

G 4<br />

treatment.<br />

It is concluded that the synergy of amendments<br />

and FYM should be exploited to get high yield<br />

of vegetable crops under sodic water irrigation.<br />

Influence of Spent Wash and Spent Wash<br />

Vermi-compost on Reclamation of Sodic <strong>Soil</strong>s<br />

(Indore Centre)<br />

An experiment was conducted at <strong>Salinity</strong> <strong>Research</strong><br />

Station, Barwaha with paddy (var. Kranti)-wheat<br />

(GW-173) cropping sequence. The soil of the<br />

experimental field was sodic Vertisols (Table 89).<br />

Spent wash and spent wash vermicompost was<br />

procured from nearby distillery. Characteristics<br />

Table 87 : Effect of FYM and gypsum on the yield of okra (t ha -1 ) under sodic water<br />

FYM<br />

Gypsum (% GR)<br />

G 0<br />

(No gypsum) G 1<br />

(25%) G 2<br />

(50%) G 3<br />

(75%) G 4<br />

(100%) Mean<br />

F 0<br />

(No FYM) 4.63 5.66 5.92 6.43 6.94 5.92<br />

F 1<br />

(10 t ha -1 ) 4.37 6.43 7.20 7.97 9.00 7.00<br />

F 2<br />

(20 t ha -1 ) 3.86 6.69 7.46 8.49 9.52 7.20<br />

Mean 4.29 6.26 6.86 7.63 8.49 -<br />

CD (5%) Gypsum = 0.22; FYM = 0.17; G x FYM = 0.38<br />

Table 88 : Effect of FYM and gypsum on the yield of cabbage (t ha -1 ) under sodic water<br />

FYM<br />

Gypsum (% GR)<br />

G 0<br />

(No gypsum) G 1<br />

(25%) G 2<br />

(50%) G 3<br />

(75%) G 4<br />

(100%) Mean<br />

F 0<br />

(No FYM) 16.54 17.73 20.41 23.34 24.12 20.43<br />

F 1<br />

(10 t ha -1 ) 17.50 18.93 21.22 25.04 26.29 21.80<br />

F 2<br />

(20 t ha -1 ) 18.53 19.84 23.79 26.25 27.43 23.17<br />

Mean 17.53 18.83 21.81 24.88 25.95 -<br />

CD (5%) Gypsum = 0.71; FYM =NS; G x FYM = 1.22;<br />

of spent wash used as soil amendment and<br />

physico-chemical properties of spent wash vermicompost<br />

and FYM are given in Table 90 and 91,<br />

respectively. The experiment was conducted with<br />

9 treatments in RBD with 3 replications in plot<br />

size of 5 x 4 m 2 .<br />

One time application of spent wash and<br />

other treatments were given 30 days prior to<br />

transplanting of paddy seedlings. The crop was<br />

fertilized with 120 : 60 : 40 kg NPK and 25 kg<br />

ZnSO 4<br />

ha -1 . The soil was puddled and 25 days old<br />

seedlings of paddy were transplanted with 20x10<br />

cm spacing. The plots were submerged with 5 cm<br />

water throughout the growing period.<br />

Wheat crop was grown in the same plots after<br />

harvesting of paddy for evaluating the residual<br />

effect of amendments. The wheat crop was<br />

fertilized with 120 kg N, 60 kg P 2<br />

O 5<br />

and 40 kg K 2<br />

O<br />

ha -1 . Five irrigations were given to wheat crop.<br />

<strong>Soil</strong> and plant parameters were analysed at the<br />

harvest of the crop.<br />

Yield and yield attributes of paddy<br />

It is evident from the Table 92 that the application<br />

of amendments in the soil significantly enhanced<br />

the growth and yield of paddy over control. The<br />

plant height of paddy varied significantly with<br />

different amendments. Application of 5.0 cm<br />

spent wash increased the plant height by 15.2<br />

<strong>11</strong>4


<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

AICRP on management of salt affected soils and use of saline water in agriculture<br />

Table 89 : Physico chemical properties of experimental soil<br />

pH s<br />

EC e<br />

(dS m -1 )<br />

Ext. Na<br />

(me 100g -1 )<br />

WS Na<br />

(me 100g -1 )<br />

Exch. Na<br />

(me 100g -1 )<br />

GR<br />

(t ha -1 )<br />

CEC<br />

(c.mol (p+) kg -1<br />

ESP<br />

8.4 1.4 16.7 1.20 5.23 9.00 40.0 38.8<br />

Ext. Na: Extractable sodium; WS Na: Water soluble sodium; Exch. Na: Exchangeable sodium; GR: Gypsum requirement;<br />

CEC: Cation exchange capacity; ESP: Exchangeable sodium percentage<br />

Table 90 : Characteristics of spent wash used as soil amendment<br />

pH s<br />

EC e<br />

(dS m -1 )<br />

mg L -1<br />

Ca Mg Na K N S BOD COD<br />

4.9 9.4 1522 880 380 8675 990 <strong>11</strong>50 4<strong>11</strong>0 20660<br />

Table 91 : Physico-chemical properties of spent wash vermi-compost and FYM used as soil amendments<br />

pH<br />

Organic<br />

s<br />

EC Per cent<br />

e<br />

(1:4) (dS m -1 ) Ca Mg K S<br />

Spent wash vermi-compost 8.5 3.8 0.78 0.38 1.10 0.55<br />

Farm Yard Manure ( FYM) 8.1 1.8 0.45 0.15 0.63 0.20<br />

Table 92 : Effect of amendments on growth, yield and yield attributes of paddy<br />

Treatments<br />

Plant<br />

height<br />

(cm)<br />

per cent over control. Further increase in the<br />

levels of spent wash also increased the plant<br />

height but it was at par with 5.0 cm spent wash<br />

application. Number of tillers and length of<br />

panicle also increased significantly over control<br />

with application of 5.0 cm spent wash and after<br />

that no significant increase in number of tillers<br />

and length of panicle over 5.0 cm spent wash<br />

application was observed. The highest grain<br />

(5.02 t ha -1 ) and straw (5.92 t ha -1 ) yield was<br />

recorded in 10.0 cm spent wash level but it was<br />

statistically at par with 5.0 cm. The application<br />

of 5.0 cm spent wash enhanced the grain and<br />

straw yield of paddy by 39.7and 44.3 per cent,<br />

respectively over control<br />

No. of<br />

effective<br />

tillers/hill<br />

Length of<br />

panicle<br />

(cm)<br />

Yield (t ha -1 )<br />

Grain<br />

Control 80.0 6.5 17.5 3.47 3.95<br />

FYM @ 5 t ha -1 83.3 6.9 18.5 3.58 4.12<br />

Vermi-compost @ 5 t ha -1 84.1 7.0 19.3 3.67 4.23<br />

Gypsum @ 75% GR 86.7 8.9 20.1 4.05 4.70<br />

Gypsum@ 75% GR+FYM @ 5 t ha -1 87.2 9.1 20.0 4.27 4.97<br />

Gypsum @ 75% GR+VC @ 5 t ha -1 87.9 9.4 20.3 4.35 5.05<br />

SW 2.5 cm 88.3 9.9 20.7 4.38 5.13<br />

SW 5.0 cm 92.2 10.5 22.5 4.85 5.70<br />

SW 10.0 cm 93.1 10.6 22.7 5.02 5.92<br />

CD (5%) 3.6 1.1 1.6 0.43 0.53<br />

GR- Gypsum requirement; FYM - Farm yard manure; VC - Vermicompost; SW- Spent wash<br />

Yield attributes and yield of wheat<br />

Straw<br />

It is evident from the data that the plant height<br />

varied significantly with the application of<br />

different amendments (Table 93). Application of<br />

5.0 cm spent wash (SW) increased the plant height<br />

by 38.0 per cent over control. Further increase in<br />

spent wash application increased the plant height<br />

over control but the increase over 5.0 cm spent<br />

wash treatment was statistically non-significant.<br />

The number of effective tillers per plant increased<br />

significantly with the applications of 5.0 cm spent<br />

wash and above over control. Further increase<br />

in the application of spent wash did not have<br />

significant increase in number of effective tillers<br />

over 5.0 cm spent wash. Application of 5.0 cm<br />

spent wash significantly enhanced the length of<br />

<strong>11</strong>5


AICRP on management of salt affected soils and use of saline water in agriculture<br />

<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

Table 93 : Effect of amendments on growth characters and yield of wheat<br />

Treatments<br />

Plant<br />

height (cm)<br />

Effective<br />

tillers/tplant<br />

Length of<br />

ear head (cm)<br />

Yield (t ha -1 )<br />

Grain<br />

Control 47.3 5.27 5.07 2.17 2.29<br />

FYM @ 5 t ha -1 48.7 5.40 5.20 2.27 2.44<br />

Vermicompost @ 5 t ha -1 50.0 5.60 5.40 2.33 2.54<br />

Gypsum @ 75% GR 56.2 6.40 5.53 3.00 3.35<br />

Gypsum@ 75% GR+FYM @ 5 t ha -1 57.6 6.73 5.80 3.40 3.49<br />

Gypsum @ 75% GR+VC @ 5 t ha -1 59.3 6.80 6.00 3.47 3.55<br />

SW 2.5 cm 62.0 6.87 6.60 3.52 3.85<br />

SW 5.0 cm 65.3 7.67 7.20 4.02 4.35<br />

SW 10.0 cm 66.0 7.93 7.33 4.17 4.47<br />

CD (5%) 3.23 0.71 0.49 0.48 0.40<br />

Straw<br />

ear head of wheat by 42 percent over control.<br />

The highest grain (4.17 t ha -1 ) and straw (4.47 t<br />

ha -1 ) yield was observed in 10.0 cm spent wash<br />

but it was at par with 5.0 cm spent wash level.<br />

Application of 5.0 cm spent wash increased the<br />

grain and straw yield by 85.2 and 89.9 per cent,<br />

respectively over control.<br />

Post harvest status of soil<br />

Application of different amendments increased<br />

the organic carbon, available N and K contents<br />

significantly over control, while decreased the<br />

soil EC e<br />

and ESP after harvest of wheat crop<br />

(Table 94). The highest organic carbon content<br />

(0.77 %) was obtained with 10.0 cm spent wash<br />

application but it did not differ significantly with<br />

5.0 cm spent wash (0.73 %). The highest available<br />

N (207.3 kg ha -1 ) and K (447 kg ha -1 ) contents in<br />

the soil were recorded in the treatment receiving<br />

10 cm spent wash but at par with 5 cm spent<br />

wash. Application of amendments decreased<br />

the EC e<br />

and ESP of soil significantly after harvest<br />

of wheat. A reduction in pH s<br />

was also observed<br />

due to application of amendments to soil but<br />

it was non-significant. The lowest EC e<br />

(1.18 dS<br />

m -1 ) and ESP (17.0) were noticed when 10 cm<br />

spent wash was applied, but it did not differ<br />

significantly with 5.0 cm level.<br />

Application of amendments improved the soil<br />

fertility status and therefore, the yield of crops<br />

Table 94 : Effect of amendments on soil properties after wheat harvest<br />

Treatments OC<br />

(%<br />

Available nutrients (kg ha -1 ) pH s<br />

EC e<br />

(dS m -1 )<br />

N P K<br />

Control 0.37 178.0 8.1 328 8.13 1.29 35.4<br />

FYM @ 5 t ha -1 0.46 186.7 9.0 335 8.10 1.28 34.6<br />

Vermicompost @ 5 t ha -1 0.47 188.3 9.2 339 8.10 1.26 34.2<br />

Gypsum @ 75% GR 0.46 185.7 9.3 353 8.10 1.24 24.5<br />

Gypsum @ 75% GR+ FYM 0.52 189.7 9.9 361 8.10 1.22 23.5<br />

@ 5 t ha -1<br />

Gypsum @ 75% GR + 0.54 192.3 9.9 373 8.10 1.22 21.9<br />

Vermicompost @ 5 t ha -1<br />

SW 2.5 cm 0.62 194.0 10.0 383 8.10 1.20 19.7<br />

SW 5.0 cm 0.73 202.7 <strong>11</strong>.7 421 8.10 1.20 17.1<br />

SW 10.0 cm 0.77 207.3 <strong>11</strong>.7 447 8.10 1.18 17.0<br />

CD (5%) 0.05 6.2 NS 35 NS 0.05 1.6<br />

SW- Spent wash<br />

ESP<br />

<strong>11</strong>6


<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

TECHNOLOGY ASSESSED AND TRANSFERRED<br />

Demonstration on Salt Tolerant Varieties of<br />

Rice (R.K. Singh and R.S. Tripathi)<br />

During kharif season, thirty eight demonstrations<br />

were conducted on salt tolerant rice varieties<br />

(CSR 23, CSR 30 and CSR 36) during the year<br />

<strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong> in salt affected soils. The demonstrations<br />

conducted at various locations in Haryana are<br />

presented in Table 95. Varieties CSR 23, CSR 30<br />

and CSR 36 produced an average grain yield of<br />

4.52, 3.13 and 4.88 t ha -1 , respectively.<br />

Table 95 : Performance of salt tolerant varieties of<br />

rice at farmers’ field<br />

Crop variety<br />

<strong>2010</strong><br />

No. Av. yield (t ha -1 )<br />

Rice-CSR 23 9 4.52<br />

Rice-CSR 30 20 3.13<br />

Rice-CSR 36 9 4.88<br />

Total 38 -<br />

Demonstration on Salt Tolerant Varieties of<br />

Wheat (R.K. Singh and Ram Ajore)<br />

During rabi season, 21 demonstrations<br />

were conducted at farmers’ field on salt<br />

tolerant wheat variety KRL 19. The results<br />

indicated that it gave an average yield of 4.25<br />

t ha -1 at salinity stress situation (Table 96).<br />

Demonstration on Salt Tolerant Varieties of<br />

Mustard (R.K. Singh and Ram Ajore)<br />

During rabi season of 2009-10, 64 demonstrations<br />

on salt tolerant varieties of mustard (CS 54<br />

and CS 56) were conducted at farmers’ fields<br />

(Table 96). The variety CS 54 gave an average<br />

yield of 1.75 t ha -1 , whereas variety CS 56 gave<br />

1.88 t ha -1 in salt affected soils of Haryana.<br />

Demonstration of wheat variety KRL 19<br />

on farmer’s field<br />

Table 96 : Performance of salt tolerant varieties of<br />

wheat and mustard at farmer’s field<br />

Crop variety<br />

No.<br />

2009-10<br />

Average yield<br />

(t ha -1 )<br />

Wheat-KRL 19 21 4.25<br />

Mustard-CS 54 32 1.75<br />

Mustard-CS 56 32 1.88<br />

Socio-Economic Impact of Salt Tolerant Crop<br />

Varieties (R.S. Tripathi, R.K. Gautam, Neeraj<br />

Kulshreshtha, P.C. Sharma and Ali Qadar)<br />

The institute has developed number of salt<br />

tolerant varieties of rice, wheat and mustard.<br />

These varieties have made remarkable impact<br />

on agricultural productivity and raising farmers’<br />

livelihood in the salt affected areas of the country.<br />

Total quantity of breeder/labelled/certified<br />

seed produced and distributed is presented in<br />

Table 97, which indicates that major share of<br />

these seeds was of rice varieties (60 percent of<br />

the total seeds produced). Contribution of wheat<br />

was about 39 percent. The state-wise distribution<br />

pattern of salt tolerant seeds of rice and wheat is<br />

given in Table 98 and 99, respectively. The statewise<br />

distribution pattern revealed that about 58<br />

per cent of the total rice was consumed in the<br />

state of Haryana alone. Uttar Pradesh was the<br />

second important state where about 21 percent<br />

rice seed was supplied. In case of salt tolerant<br />

wheat varieties, almost half of the total quantity<br />

of seeds was utilized in Haryana and 44 per cent<br />

in Uttar Pradesh. Small quantity of rice seed was<br />

supplied to Bihar, while little quantity of wheat<br />

seed to Rajasthan.<br />

Table 97 : Breeder/ labelled/ certified seeds of<br />

salt tolerant varieties produced and<br />

distributed during the year 2000 - 09<br />

Crop Quantity (tonnes) Percentage<br />

Rice 18.95 59.70<br />

Wheat 12.32 38.80<br />

Mustard 0.49 1.50<br />

Total 31.76 100.00<br />

<strong>11</strong>7


Technology assessed and transferred <strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

Table 98 : State wise distribution of salt tolerant seed of rice varieties (%)<br />

State CSR 10 CSR 13 CSR 23 CSR 27 CSR 30 CSR 36 Total<br />

Haryana 40.0 25.0 65.1 38.1 87.1 90.8 57.8<br />

Uttar Pradesh 60.0 50.0 1.4 - 12.0 1.0 20.7<br />

Punjab - - - - 0.9 - 0.01<br />

Bihar - - 31.7 13.3 - 7.7 8.8<br />

Others - 25.0 1.9 48.6 - 0.6 12.7<br />

Table 99 : State-wise distribution of seed of salt<br />

tolerant wheat varieties (%)<br />

State KRL 1-4 KRL 19 Total<br />

Haryana 54.27 44.24 49.26<br />

Uttar Pradesh 40.56 47.00 43.78<br />

Punjab 1.50 0.40 0.75<br />

Rajasthan 3.29 6.03 4.86<br />

Gujarat 0.38 1.27 0.83<br />

Economic Impact of Zero Tillage Technology in<br />

Reclaimed Sodic <strong>Soil</strong>s (R.S. Tripathi)<br />

Zero tillage technology is probably one of the<br />

best ways to reduce the cost of cultivation and<br />

sustaining productivity of natural resources like<br />

soil and water. It reduces input cost, sustains<br />

yield, enhances profitability, improves soil<br />

nutrients and offers benefits of retained surface<br />

residues and reduced soil and water losses.<br />

Results of the study, based on zero tillage practice<br />

adopted at <strong>CSSRI</strong> farm during the year 2009-10<br />

for <strong>11</strong> crops, indicated that on an average, there<br />

was 40 per cent saving of human labour in zero<br />

tillage as compared to conventional method of<br />

crop production. In field preparation, savings of<br />

machine power was 60 per cent and irrigation<br />

water 25 per cent in zero tillage as compared to<br />

conventional method. On an average, there was<br />

30 per cent reduction in the cost of cultivation<br />

under zero tillage as compared to conventional<br />

method of crop production (Table 100).<br />

Response of gypsum in wheat<br />

Technology for reclamation of sodic soil and<br />

water using gypsum was demonstrated at the<br />

field of Sh. Virender Singh, village Bhurjat, Distt.<br />

Mahendragarh. The yield of wheat increased<br />

significantly with the increasing dose of gypsum<br />

application (Table 101). The treatment G 100<br />

increased the wheat yield by more than 2 times<br />

over G 0<br />

. An appreciable increase in yields was<br />

observed in other treatments also.<br />

Table 100 : Cost of cultivation for crops grown by<br />

Crop<br />

zero and conventional tillage<br />

Cost of cultivation (Rs. ha -1 )<br />

Conv.<br />

method<br />

Zero tillage<br />

method<br />

Reduction<br />

(%)<br />

Arhar 24,581 15,323 37.66<br />

Sorghum 21,294 15,522 27.<strong>11</strong><br />

Moong 24,432 17,636 27.82<br />

Soybean 29,927 19,913 33.46<br />

Guar 19,959 10,631 46.74<br />

Bajra 23,290 15,167 34.88<br />

Barley 27,586 18,949 31.31<br />

Oat 27,586 19,042 30.97<br />

Wheat 36,020 26,994 25.06<br />

Mustard 29,285 18,398 37.18<br />

Gram 33,713 22,693 32.69<br />

Average 27,800 18,500 30.00<br />

Table 101 : Effect of gypsum on wheat yield at<br />

farmer’s field<br />

Treatments Grain yield (t ha -1 )<br />

G 0<br />

1.61<br />

G 25<br />

2.80<br />

G 50<br />

3.55<br />

G 75<br />

3.88<br />

G 100<br />

4.62<br />

CD (5%) 0.49<br />

Demonstration of wheat varieties at farmer’s field in Village Bhurjat District Mahendragarh<br />

<strong>11</strong>8


General/ Miscellaneous


<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

Sr.<br />

No<br />

TRAININGS IN INDIA AND ABROAD<br />

Name and Designation Subject Duration Place<br />

1. Dr. S.K. Gupta<br />

Project Co-ordinator (SWS)<br />

Dr. D.S. Bundela<br />

Principal Scientist<br />

Dr. R.L. Meena<br />

Scientist (SS)<br />

Sh. J.P. Sharma<br />

Technical Officer<br />

Sh. S.K. Dahiya<br />

Technical Officer<br />

Sh. M.P. Bhatia<br />

Technical Assistant<br />

2. Sh. Sultan Singh<br />

Mrs. Sushma Garg<br />

Mrs.Jasbir Kaur, Mrs.Anita<br />

Assistants<br />

Sh. BachanSingh<br />

Sh. Hari Pal<br />

Sr. Clerks<br />

3. Sh. M.N.V. Rao<br />

Jr. Acctts Officer<br />

Sh. K.R.K. Prasad<br />

Lab. Technician<br />

4. Dr. R.L. Meena<br />

Scientist (Sr. Scale)<br />

5. Dr. R.K. Yadav<br />

Principal Scientist<br />

Special Course on Performance<br />

Evaluation of Canal Irrigation projects<br />

using Remote Sensing and GIS<br />

Sponsored by NAIP<br />

Training on Hindi Typing and Official<br />

Correspondence<br />

Technical and Administrative Support<br />

for Consortia based <strong>Research</strong> in<br />

Agriculture<br />

International Training Programme on<br />

Bioremediation (Phyto-remediation)<br />

Sponsored by NAIP (ICAR)<br />

Training under Public Sector Linkage<br />

Programme under AusAid Project<br />

15.4.<strong>2010</strong>-<br />

24.4.<strong>2010</strong><br />

24.5.<strong>2010</strong>-<br />

26.5.<strong>2010</strong><br />

16.6.<strong>2010</strong>-<br />

22.6.<strong>2010</strong><br />

15.7.<strong>2010</strong>-<br />

13.10.<strong>2010</strong><br />

02.8.<strong>2010</strong> -<br />

24.9.<strong>2010</strong><br />

IIRS,<br />

Dehradun<br />

UPSC,<br />

New Delhi<br />

NAARM,<br />

Hyderabad<br />

USDA,<br />

Beltsville,<br />

Maryland<br />

(USA)<br />

Australia,<br />

Thailand<br />

6. Mrs. Dinesh Gugnani<br />

Mrs. Santra Mrs. Rita<br />

Sr. Stenographers<br />

7. Dr. Parveen Kumar<br />

Principal Scientist<br />

8. Dr. B.K. Bandyopadhyay<br />

Principal Scientist<br />

Dr. D. Burman<br />

Senior Scientist<br />

9. Sh. Jai Pal Singh<br />

Assistant<br />

Training Course for Personal Assistant 09.8.<strong>2010</strong>-<br />

20.8.<strong>2010</strong><br />

Crop Modeling, Templates and<br />

Tools for the Use of Trial Data in<br />

Performance Prediction and Targeting<br />

of Potato Clones and Varieties<br />

Workshop on Procurement related<br />

Matter and Financial Management<br />

System under World Bank Funded<br />

Project of NAIP<br />

Noting and Drafting for Section<br />

Officers/Dealing Asstt<br />

09.8.<strong>2010</strong>-<br />

13.8.<strong>2010</strong><br />

August 17-18,<br />

<strong>2010</strong><br />

06.9.<strong>2010</strong>-<br />

08.9.<strong>2010</strong><br />

ISTM,<br />

New Delhi<br />

CPRI,<br />

Shimla<br />

ICAR<br />

<strong>Research</strong><br />

Complex<br />

for Eastern<br />

Region, Patna<br />

ISTM,<br />

New Delhi<br />

10. Sh. VishalAcharya<br />

AF&AO<br />

Sh. H.S. Pal<br />

Assistant<br />

Management Development<br />

Programme<br />

07.9.<strong>2010</strong>-<br />

10.9.<strong>2010</strong><br />

Thiruvananthapuram<br />

121


Trainings in india and abroad <strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

<strong>11</strong>. Sh. Surender Mohan<br />

Farm Manager<br />

<strong>Research</strong> Station Management to Farm<br />

Managers<br />

<strong>11</strong>.10.<strong>2010</strong>-<br />

16.10.<strong>2010</strong><br />

ICRISAT,<br />

Hyderabad<br />

12. Dr. H.S. Jat<br />

Sr. Scientist<br />

Improved Prediction of Agroforestry<br />

Productivity and Reclamation<br />

Opportunities in Shallow Water Table<br />

and Salt Affected Landscapes of India<br />

and Pakistan<br />

18.10.<strong>2010</strong>-<br />

22.10.<strong>2010</strong><br />

PAU,<br />

Ludhiana<br />

13. Dr. R. Raju<br />

Scientist<br />

Model Training Course on Integrated<br />

Water Resources Management<br />

and Use of Poor Quality Water in<br />

Agriculture<br />

23.<strong>11</strong>.<strong>2010</strong>-<br />

30.<strong>11</strong>.<strong>2010</strong><br />

<strong>CSSRI</strong><br />

Karnal<br />

14. Dr. Pragati Maity<br />

Scientist<br />

Training Programme on Data Analysis<br />

Using SAS<br />

18.12.<strong>2010</strong>-<br />

24.12.<strong>2010</strong><br />

NDRI<br />

Karnal<br />

15. Dr. R. Raju<br />

Scientist<br />

Dr. S. L.Krishna Murthi<br />

Scientist<br />

16. Dr. P.C. Sharma<br />

Principal Scientist<br />

Data Analysis Using SAS 24.1.20<strong>11</strong>-<br />

31.1.20<strong>11</strong><br />

Participated in Training Workshop on<br />

Right to Information Act 2005<br />

03.2.20<strong>11</strong>-<br />

05.2.20<strong>11</strong><br />

NDRI<br />

Karnal<br />

New Delhi.<br />

17. Sh. B. M. Meena<br />

Lib. Asstt.<br />

National Conference of Agricultural<br />

Libraries User Community<br />

24.2.20<strong>11</strong>-<br />

25.2.<strong>2010</strong><br />

IARI,<br />

New Delhi<br />

18. Dr. D.S. Bundela<br />

Principal Scientist<br />

Training on NAIP Procurement and<br />

Financial Management System<br />

28.2.20<strong>11</strong> NDRI, Karnal<br />

19. Sh. Rajeev Kumar<br />

Technical Officer<br />

Statistical Computing Environment 22.3.20<strong>11</strong>-<br />

28.3.20<strong>11</strong><br />

NDRI,<br />

Karnal<br />

<br />

122


<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

DEPUTATION OF SCIENTISTS ABROAD<br />

Sr.<br />

No<br />

Name Subject Period of<br />

deputation<br />

1. Dr. R.K. Singh Participated in 12 th International Congress of<br />

Ethnobiology<br />

2. Dr. P.C. Sharma Study visit on “Performance of Terminal Drought<br />

Tolerance QTL-NILs of Pearl Millet under<br />

Salt Stress and Identification of Polymorphic<br />

Gene based Primers in Salt Tolerant & Sensitve<br />

Genotypes of Indian Mustard<br />

02.5.<strong>2010</strong> to<br />

14.5.<strong>2010</strong><br />

07.5.<strong>2010</strong> to<br />

03.7.<strong>2010</strong><br />

Country<br />

Canada<br />

United<br />

Kingdom<br />

3. Dr. R.K. Singh Participated in 18 th Commonwealth Forestry<br />

Conference<br />

4. Dr. N.P.S.<br />

Yaduvanshi<br />

Participated in 9 th World Congress of <strong>Soil</strong><br />

Science<br />

5. Dr. Y.P. Singh Consultant IRRI- East & South Africa Region<br />

Office (ESARO)<br />

28.6.<strong>2010</strong> to<br />

02.7.<strong>2010</strong><br />

31.7.<strong>2010</strong> to<br />

12.8.<strong>2010</strong><br />

01.9.<strong>2010</strong> to<br />

31.8.20<strong>11</strong><br />

United<br />

Kingdom<br />

Australia<br />

Tanzania<br />

6. Dr. Pradip Dey Participated in the World Bank Summit 27.9.<strong>2010</strong> to<br />

30.9.<strong>2010</strong><br />

7. Sh Gajender Yadav Study leave 01.10.<strong>2010</strong> to<br />

30.09.2013<br />

USA<br />

United<br />

Kingdom<br />

8. Dr. S.K. Kamra Participated in Brazilian Symposium on<br />

<strong>Salinity</strong><br />

9. Dr. J.C. Dagar Participated in Global Forum on Salinization<br />

and Climate Change (GFSCC)-<strong>2010</strong><br />

10. Dr. Chhedi Lal Participated in International German Academic<br />

Exchange Service (DAAD) Alumni Summer<br />

School “Water & Energy<br />

<strong>11</strong>. Dr. S.K. Kamra Workshop of INNO-ASIA Project at Department<br />

of Geo- informatics, Friedrich Schiller University<br />

of Jena, Germany<br />

12.10.<strong>2010</strong> to<br />

15.10.<strong>2010</strong><br />

25.10.<strong>2010</strong> to<br />

29.10.<strong>2010</strong><br />

14.<strong>11</strong>.<strong>2010</strong> to<br />

26.<strong>11</strong>.<strong>2010</strong><br />

07.02.20<strong>11</strong> to<br />

<strong>11</strong>.02.20<strong>11</strong><br />

Brazil<br />

Spain<br />

Germany<br />

Germany<br />

12. Dr. B. K.<br />

Bandyopadhyay<br />

Workshop on Project Proposal Development on<br />

Ganges Delta Challenge Programme on Water<br />

and Food<br />

24.1.20<strong>11</strong> to<br />

27.1.20<strong>11</strong><br />

Bangladesh<br />

13. Dr. B. K.<br />

Bandyopadhyay<br />

Participated in the Conference on Deltas under<br />

Climate Change: The Challenges of Adaptation<br />

02.03.20<strong>11</strong> to<br />

0 4.03. 20<strong>11</strong><br />

Vietnam<br />

<br />

123


<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

AWARDS AND RECOGNITIONS<br />

• The Institute has been bestowed with the<br />

Sardar Patel Best Institute Award - 2009 by<br />

the Council at NAAS complex, New Delhi<br />

on 16.7.<strong>2010</strong><br />

• Out of 39 research organizations funded<br />

under Farmers’ Participatory Action<br />

<strong>Research</strong> Project (FPARP), the Institute<br />

has been bestowed with the National<br />

Groundwater Augmentation Award (20<strong>11</strong>)<br />

on Enhancement of Groundwater Recharge<br />

and Water Productivity in North West India<br />

by the Ministry of Water Resources (Govt.<br />

of India) during 3 rd Ground Water Congress<br />

organized at New Delhi on March 22-23,<br />

20<strong>11</strong><br />

• Dr. S.K. Gupta, Project Coordinator, AICRP<br />

on Management of Salt Affected <strong>Soil</strong>s and<br />

Use of Saline Water in Agriculture has been<br />

bestowed with the Fellowship of the Indian<br />

Society of Coastal Agricultural <strong>Research</strong><br />

for his outstanding contribution in water<br />

management in coastal ecosystem and to<br />

alleviate the salinity problems in Tsunami<br />

affected agricultural lands in Andaman<br />

and Nicobar Islands, Tamil Nadu and<br />

Maldives.<br />

• Commonwealth Scholarship Commission<br />

has awarded its prestigious scholarship<br />

award under the Commonwealth<br />

Scholarship and Fellowship Plan-<strong>2010</strong> to Sh.<br />

Gajender Yadav, Scientist (Agronomy) for<br />

pursuing his doctoral research at University<br />

of Reading, U.K. w.e.f October, <strong>2010</strong><br />

• Dr. Ranjay K. Singh, Senior Scientist has been<br />

conferred with Lansdowne Distinguished<br />

Professor Award-<strong>2010</strong> for his outstanding<br />

contribution in the field of traditional<br />

ecological knowledge, community based<br />

biodiversity conservation and community<br />

mobilization in sustainable natural<br />

resources conservation in eastern Himalaya.<br />

He has also been conferred the prestigious<br />

Fellowship of The Linnean Society of<br />

London for his outstanding contribution in<br />

the field of participatory community based<br />

biocultural diversity conservation in eastern<br />

Himalayas<br />

• Dr. Sanjay Arora, Senior Scientist was<br />

bestowed with the Gold Medal by <strong>Soil</strong><br />

Conservation Society of India (SCSI), New<br />

Delhi for his outstanding contribution<br />

in Natural Resource Management and<br />

Development especially in the field of <strong>Soil</strong><br />

and Water Conservation<br />

• Dr. S.K. Chaudhari, Principal Scientist<br />

has been conferred with the Fellowship<br />

of Maharashtra Academy of Sciences<br />

Dr. S.K. Gupta, Director (A) receiving the Sadar Patel<br />

Best Institute Award -2009 from Shri Sharad Pawar ji,<br />

Hon’ble Minister of Agriculture, Consumer Affairs, Food<br />

and Public Distribution, Govt. of India, New Delhi<br />

Dr. D.K. Sharma, Director receiving the National<br />

Groundwater Augmentation Award - 20<strong>11</strong> from<br />

Shri Salman Khurshid, Hon’ble Minister of Water<br />

Resources, Govt. of India, New Delhi<br />

124


<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

Awards and recognitions<br />

for advancing the knowledge and<br />

understanding of soil-water dynamics in<br />

Vertisols and developing new concepts<br />

explaining changes in the hydraulic<br />

properties of Vertisols. He has also been<br />

bestowed with Outstanding Achievement<br />

Award of the Institution of Engineers (India)<br />

in the field of Irrigation Water Management<br />

for the year 2009-10 for his contributions<br />

in on-farm water management research<br />

in promoting efficient water management<br />

technologies in the tribal areas.<br />

• Dr. Pradip Dey has been bestowed with<br />

the World Bank Summit Scholarship by the<br />

World Bank, Washington, DC. He has also<br />

been designated as Social Innovator by the<br />

World Bank<br />

• Dr Parveen Kumar has been awarded<br />

Indian Potato Association - Kaushalaya<br />

Sikka Memorial Award 2005-09 for his<br />

outstanding research contribution in the<br />

area of Biochemical Parameters Influencing<br />

Processing Quality in Potato<br />

• Dr. C.B. Pandey was conferred with Dr.<br />

K.G. Tejwani award on 10.12.<strong>2010</strong> for the<br />

year 2009 by Indian Society of Agroforestry,<br />

Jhansi for his outstanding work in<br />

Agroforestry <strong>Research</strong> and Development<br />

• Krishi Kiran Patrika (Hindi) of this institute<br />

also begged the coveted Ganesh Sankar<br />

Vidhyarthi Hindi Krishi Patrika Pursakar–<br />

2009.<br />

<strong>CSSRI</strong> Excellence Awards<br />

The following scientists were bestowed with<br />

prestigious <strong>CSSRI</strong> Excellence Award on <strong>Soil</strong><br />

<strong>Salinity</strong> and Water Quality:<br />

Biennium 2004-05: Jointly to Dr. S.K. Gupta,<br />

Project Co-ordinator, AICRP on Use of Saline<br />

Water in Agriculture, <strong>CSSRI</strong>, Karnal and<br />

Dr. S.G. Patil, Chief Scientist (Water<br />

Management) University of Agricultural<br />

Sciences, Dharwad.<br />

Biennium 2006-07: Jointly to Dr. J.C. Dagar,<br />

Assistant Director General (Agronomy), ICAR,<br />

New Delhi and Dr. B.A. Chougule, Ex-Officer<br />

Incharge, Agricultural <strong>Research</strong> Station, MPKV,<br />

Sangli.<br />

The following technical, administrative and<br />

supporting staff was awarded Best Worker<br />

Award-<strong>2010</strong>:<br />

Dr. S.K. Jha, Technical Officer (T 7-8)<br />

Sh. S.K. Goel, Assistant<br />

Sh. Karam Singh, Skilled Supporting Staff<br />

Dr. S.K. Gupta, Director (A) receiving the Ganesh Sankar<br />

Vidhyarthi Hindi Krishi Patrika Pursakar–2009 from<br />

Prof. V.K. Thomas, Hon’ble Minister of State for<br />

Agriculture, Govt. of India, New Delhi<br />

125


<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

LINKAGES AND COLLABORATIONS<br />

Collaborative Programmes at Main Institute,<br />

Karnal<br />

International Collaborations<br />

• BIOSAFOR-BIOSALINE (AGRO)<br />

FORESTRY : Remediation of saline<br />

wastelands through production of<br />

renewable energy, biomaterials and fodder<br />

(Funded by European Union)<br />

• Stress tolerant rice for poor farmers of Africa<br />

and South Asia (Funded by IRRI-BMGF)<br />

• Enhancing and stabilizing the productivity<br />

of salt affected areas by incorporating<br />

genes for tolerance of abiotic stresses in rice<br />

(Funded by BMZ-IRRI)<br />

• Wheat improvement for waterlogging,<br />

salinity and element toxicities in Australia<br />

and India (sponsored by ACIAR, Australia)<br />

• Cereal Systems Initiative for South Asia<br />

(CSISA) (sponsored by IRRI Philippines<br />

and CIMMYT Mexico)<br />

• Marker assisted breeding of abiotic stress<br />

tolerant rice varieties with major QTL for<br />

drought, submergence and salt tolerance<br />

(DBT-India-IRRI)<br />

National Collaborations<br />

• Transgenics in crops-salinity tolerance<br />

in rice: functional genomics component<br />

(Funded by ICAR)<br />

• Monitoring and evaluation of large-scale<br />

subsurface drainage projects in the state of<br />

Haryana (Funded by Haryana Operational<br />

Pilot Project, DOA, Haryana)<br />

• Development and evaluation of salt tolerant<br />

transgenic rice (Funded by Department of<br />

Bio-technology)<br />

• Farmers’ participatory research on<br />

enhancing groundwater recharge and water<br />

productivity in North-West India (Funded<br />

by Ministry of Water Resources, GOI))<br />

• Control of waterlogging and salinity<br />

through agroforestry interventions (Funded<br />

by INCID)<br />

• Multi-locational evaluation of bread wheat<br />

germplasm (Funded by NBPGR)<br />

• AMAAS-Application of micro-organism in<br />

agriculture and allied sectors (Funded by<br />

ICAR)<br />

• Intellectual property management and<br />

transfer/commercialization of agricultural<br />

technology system (Funded by ICAR)<br />

• Development of spectral reflectance<br />

methods and low cost sensors for real<br />

time applications of variable rate inputs in<br />

precision farming (Funded by NAIP)<br />

• Network project on improvement of<br />

salt tolerance in wheat using molecular<br />

approach (DWR-<strong>CSSRI</strong>)<br />

• Decision support system for enhancing<br />

productivity in irrigated saline environment<br />

using remote sensing modelling and GIS<br />

(Funded by NAIP)<br />

Collaborative programmes at Regional<br />

<strong>Research</strong> Station, Canning Town<br />

International Collaborations<br />

• International collaborative programme on<br />

testing rice germplasm for coastal salinity<br />

(IRSSTN) with IRRI, Philippines<br />

• Advanced cultures on rice for shallow<br />

and deep water situations with IRRI,<br />

Philippines<br />

• IRRI-BMZ Project on incorporation of salt<br />

tolerance gene in rice<br />

National Collaborations<br />

• Coastal salinity tolerant varietal trial<br />

(CSTVT) with DRR, Hyderabad<br />

126


<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

Linkages and collaborations<br />

• Strategies for sustainable management<br />

of degraded coastal land and water for<br />

enhancing livelihood security of farming<br />

communities (NAIP GFF Funding )<br />

Collaborative programmes at Regional<br />

<strong>Research</strong> Station, Lucknow<br />

International Collaborations<br />

• IRRI-BMZ project on incorporation of salt<br />

tolerance gene in rice (Funded by BMZ-<br />

IRRI)<br />

• Stress tolerant rice for poor farmers of Africa<br />

and South Asia (Funded by BMGF-IRRI)<br />

National Collaborations<br />

• Holistic approach for improved livelihood<br />

security through livestock based farming<br />

system in Barabanki and Rai Bareily districts<br />

of U.P. ( Funded by NAIP)<br />

• Impact assessment of climate change on crop<br />

production under salt affected environment<br />

of Uttar Pradesh (ICAR-Network Project)<br />

Collaborative programmes at Regional<br />

<strong>Research</strong> Station, Bharuch<br />

National Collaborations<br />

• Feasibility study using biological sludge<br />

from Nitro-ETP Plant and treated effluent<br />

from Environmental Control Unit 1 of<br />

GNFC for crop production on Vertisols<br />

(GNVFC, Bharuch)<br />

• Feasibility studies on the use of treated<br />

effluent from Aniline-TDI Plant of GNFC<br />

Unit II in diverse crop interventions on<br />

Vertisols (GNVFC, Bharuch)<br />

<br />

127


<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

LIST OF PUBLICATIONS<br />

Journal Papers<br />

Arora, Sanjay and Chahal, D.S. <strong>2010</strong>. Chemical<br />

forms of boron in relation to soil properties<br />

and their contribution to available and total<br />

boron pool. Agrochemica, LIV (4): 193-204<br />

Arora, Sanjay and Chahal, D.S. <strong>2010</strong>. Effect of<br />

soil properties on boron adsorption and<br />

release in arid and semi-arid benchmark<br />

soils. Communications in <strong>Soil</strong> Science and Plant<br />

Analysis, 41 (21): 2532-2544.<br />

Bandyopadhyay, B.K., Mandal, Subhasis,<br />

Burman, D. and Sarangi, S. K. <strong>2010</strong>. <strong>Soil</strong> and<br />

water management options for enhancing<br />

agricultural productivity of coastal area of<br />

West Bengal. Journal of the Indian Society of<br />

Coastal Agricultural <strong>Research</strong>, 28(1): 1-7.<br />

Bandyopadhyay, S., Mandal, S., Datta, K. K.,<br />

Devi, P., Bhattacharya, D. and Bera, A. K. <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

Economic analysis of risk of gastrointestinal<br />

parasite infection in cattle in North Eastern<br />

States of India, Tropical Animal Health and<br />

Production, 42(7):1481-1486.<br />

Bhatt, B.P., Sarangi, S.K. and De, L.C. <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

Fuel wood characteristics of some firewood<br />

trees and shurbs of eastern Himalaya, India.<br />

Energy Sources Part A, 32: 469-474.<br />

Burman, D. Bandyopadhyay, B.K. and Mahanta,<br />

K. K. <strong>2010</strong>. Management of acid sulphate soil<br />

of coastal Sunderban Region: Observations<br />

under On-farm trial. Journal of the Indian<br />

Society of Coastal Agricultural <strong>Research</strong>, 28(1):8-<br />

<strong>11</strong>.<br />

Chander, Subhash, Sharma, K.C., Jat, H.S and<br />

Meena, Rajpal. <strong>2010</strong>. Productivity and quality<br />

of arable crops and soil fertility as influenced<br />

by ley farming in hot region of Rajasthan.<br />

Indian Journal of Agronomy, 55 (2): 157-164.<br />

Chaudhari, S.K., Sahu S.C. and Khot A.B. <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

Response of french bean (Phaseolus vulgaris)<br />

to irrigation schedules, phosphorus levels<br />

and phosphorus solublizer in Vertisols.<br />

Environment and Ecology, 28 (3B): 2141-2143.<br />

Chaudhari, S.K., Somawanshi, R.B. and<br />

Bardhan, G. 2007. Effect of water quality on<br />

moisture retention in the soils of different<br />

texture. Journal of Agricultural Physics, 7:<br />

20-26. (published in <strong>2010</strong>)<br />

Dey, P., Rai, Mathura, Gangopadhyay, K.K.,<br />

Das, Bikash, Nath, Vishal and Reddy, N.N.<br />

<strong>2010</strong>. Effect of phosphorus on growth, yield<br />

use efficiency and leaf nutrient composition<br />

of litchi grown on alfisol. Indian J. Hort, 67(3):<br />

394-396.<br />

Dushyantha, Kumar, B.M., Shadakshari, Y.G.<br />

and Krishnamurthy, S.L. <strong>2010</strong>. Genotype<br />

x environment interaction and stability<br />

analysis for grain yield and its components<br />

in Halugidda local rice mutants. Electronic<br />

Journal of Plant Breeding, 1(5): 1286- 1289.<br />

Dubey, S.K., Yadav, Rashmi, Yadav, R.K., Sharma,<br />

V.K. and Minhas, P.S.. <strong>2010</strong>. Contamination<br />

of ground water as a consequence of land<br />

disposal of dye waste mixed sewage effluents:<br />

A case study of Panipat District of Haryana,<br />

India. Bull. Environ Contamination Toxicology,<br />

85: 295–300<br />

Gautam, R.K., Nayak, A.K., Sharma, D.K.,<br />

Qadar, Ali, Dey, P. and Singh, G. <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

Morphological and chemical fingerprinting of<br />

Sweet Basil (Ocimum basilicum L.) genotypes<br />

grown in sodic soil. Agrochimica, 54 (5): 289-<br />

302.<br />

Gopali, Bardhan, S.K. Chaudhari, and P.K.<br />

Mohapatra. <strong>2010</strong>. Saturated hydraulic<br />

conductivity of Vertisol, Inceptisol and<br />

Entisol as influenced by irrigation water<br />

quality. Journal of <strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Salinity</strong> and Water<br />

Quality, 2: 45-53.<br />

Hadda, M.S. and Arora, Sanjay. <strong>2010</strong>. Water<br />

productivity through rainwater harvesting<br />

and land treatment in rainfed sub-montane<br />

region. Journal of <strong>Soil</strong> and Water Conservation,<br />

9(2) : 109-<strong>11</strong>3.<br />

Jat, H.S., Mann, J.S., Sharma, S.C. and Chand,<br />

Roop. <strong>2010</strong>. Distribution and performance<br />

of ardu (Ailanthus spp) in semi-arid regions<br />

of Rajasthan. The Indian Journal of Small<br />

Ruminants, 16 (2): 232-235.<br />

128


<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

List of publications<br />

Joshi, P.K., Kumar, R., Rajput, V.D. and Singh,<br />

N. <strong>2010</strong>. Isolation and screening of bacterial<br />

isolates for tolerance to heavy metals. Journal<br />

of <strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Salinity</strong> and Water Quality, 2 (1): 12-17.<br />

Kadam, D.M., Nangare, D.D., Singh, R. and<br />

Kumar, S. 20<strong>11</strong>. Low-cost greenhouse<br />

technology for drying onion (Allium cepa<br />

l.) slices. Journal of Food Process Engineering.<br />

34(1):67-82.<br />

Kaur, S., Arora, Sanjay, Jalali, V.K. and Mondal,<br />

A.K. <strong>2010</strong>. <strong>Soil</strong> sulphur forms in relation to<br />

physical and chemical properties of mid-hill<br />

soils of North India. Communications in <strong>Soil</strong><br />

Science and Plant Analysis, 41(3): 277-289.<br />

Krishan Kumar and Gupta, S.K. <strong>2010</strong>. Decline<br />

of groundwater tables in the upper Yamuna<br />

basin : Causes and management strategies.<br />

Irrigation and Drainage, 47: 606-620<br />

Kumar, S. and Dey, P. 20<strong>11</strong>. Effects of different<br />

mulches and irrigation methods on root<br />

growth, nutrient uptake, water-use efficiency<br />

and yield of strawberry. Scientia Hort. 127(3):<br />

318-324.<br />

Mandal, A.K. and Sharma, R.C. <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

Computerized database of salt affected<br />

soils in peninsular region of India using<br />

Geographic Information System. Journal of the<br />

Indian Society of <strong>Soil</strong> Science, 58(1): 105-<strong>11</strong>6.<br />

Mandal, Subhasis and Datta, K.K. <strong>2010</strong>. Economic<br />

evaluation of farming system research in<br />

NEH Region: Some Issues, Indian Journal of<br />

Agricultural Economics, 65(1):<strong>11</strong>8-134.<br />

Marwaha, R.S., Pandey, S.K., Kumar, Dinesh,<br />

Singh, S.V. and Kumar, Parveen. <strong>2010</strong>. Potato<br />

processing scenario in India: Industrial<br />

limitations, future projections, challenges<br />

ahead and remedies – A review. J. Food<br />

Science Technology, 47(2):137-156.<br />

Pandey C.B. and Chaudhari S.K. <strong>2010</strong>. <strong>Soil</strong> and<br />

nutrient losses for different land uses and<br />

vegetative methods for their control on hilly<br />

terrain of South Andaman. Indian Journal of<br />

Agricultural Sciences, 80:399-404.<br />

Pandey C.B., Chaudhari S.K., Dagar J.C., Singh<br />

G.B. and Singh R.K. <strong>2010</strong>. <strong>Soil</strong> N mineralization<br />

and microbial biomass carbon affected by<br />

different tillage levels in a hot humid tropic.<br />

<strong>Soil</strong> and Tillage <strong>Research</strong>, <strong>11</strong>0: 33-41.<br />

Sandhu, K.S., Chinna, G.S., Marwaha, R.S.,<br />

Kumar, Parveen and Pandey, S.K. <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

Effect of nitrogen fertilization on yield and<br />

chipping quality of processing varieties<br />

grown in cooler north Indian plains. Potato<br />

Journal, 37(3-4): 143-150.<br />

Sarangi, S.K., Saikia, U.S. and Lama, T.D. <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

Effect of rice (Oryza sativa) straw mulching<br />

on the performance of rapeseed (Brassica<br />

campestris) varieties in rice-rapeseed cropping<br />

system. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences,<br />

80(7): 603-605.<br />

Satapathy, K.K. and Sarangi, S.K. <strong>2010</strong>. Longterm<br />

effect of alternate land use systems on<br />

hydrology, soil properties and economics<br />

in a fragile hill ecosystem. Journal of <strong>Soil</strong> and<br />

Water Conservation, 9(1): 46-50.<br />

Sharma, A., Jalali, V.K. and Arora, Sanjay. <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

Non-exchangeable potassium release and<br />

its removal in foot-hill soils of North-west<br />

Himalayas. Catena, 82(2): <strong>11</strong>2-<strong>11</strong>7.<br />

Singh, Ravender, Chaudhari, S.K., Kundu, D.K.,<br />

Sengar, S.S. and Kumar Ashwani. <strong>2010</strong>. Water<br />

storage capacity, erosion and dispersion<br />

behaviour of major soil sub-groups of<br />

Chhattisgarh. Journal of Indian Society of <strong>Soil</strong><br />

Science, 58:64-69.<br />

Singh, Gurbachan, Bundela, D.S., Sethi,<br />

Madhurama, Lal, K. and Kamra, S.K. <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

Remote sensing and geographic information<br />

system for appraisal of salt-affected soils in<br />

India. Journal of Environmental Quality, 39(1):<br />

5-15.<br />

Singh, S.V., Pandey, S.K., Kumar, Dinesh,<br />

Marwaha, R.S., Manivel, P., Kumar Parveen,<br />

Singh, B.P. and Bhardwaj, V. <strong>2010</strong>. Kufri<br />

Frysona: First high yielding potato variety for<br />

French fries in India. Potato Journal, 37(3-4):<br />

103-109.<br />

Singh, Y.P., Singh, Ranbir, Sharma, D.K. <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

Determination of time frame for substitution<br />

of salt-tolerant varieties of rice (Oryza sativa)<br />

and wheat (Triticum aestivum) through crop<br />

diversification in sodic soils. Indian Journal of<br />

Agricultural Sciences, 80 (10):<br />

129


List of publications <strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

Verma, A. Gupta, S.K. and Isaac, R.K. <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

Long-term use of saline drainage waters<br />

for irrigation in subsurface drained lands:<br />

simulation modeling with SWAP. Journal of<br />

Agricultural Engineering, 47: 15-23.<br />

Yadav, R.K., Minhas, P.S., Khajanchi, Lal,<br />

Chaturvedi, R.K. and Verma, T. P. <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

Heavy metals distribution in semi-arid<br />

Ustochrepts, crops and ground water with<br />

long-term waste water irrigation. <strong>Soil</strong> Use<br />

and Management; DOI: 10. <strong>11</strong><strong>11</strong>/j. 1475-2743-<br />

<strong>2010</strong>.00267.x.<br />

Sharma, P.C., Sehgal, D., Singh, D., Singh, G.<br />

and Yadav, R.S. <strong>2010</strong>. A major terminal<br />

drought tolerance QTL of pearl millet is also<br />

associated with reduced salt uptake and<br />

enhanced growth under salt stress. Molecular<br />

Breeding, DOI 10.1007/s 1032-010-9423-3.<br />

Singh, D. and Sharma, P.C. <strong>2010</strong>. Effect of NaCl<br />

stress on photosynthesis characteristics and<br />

antioxidant enzymes in rice cultivars. Indian<br />

journal of Plant Physiology, 15 (3) : 255-258.<br />

Singh, D., Ram, P.C., Dar, S.R. and Sharma,<br />

P.C. <strong>2010</strong>. Alleviating adverse effects of<br />

soil salinity in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)<br />

through application of zinc fertilizer. Indian<br />

journal of Plant Physiology, 15 (4) : 389-395.<br />

Islam, M.T., Sharma, P.C., Gautam, R.K.,<br />

Singh, D., Singh, S., Panesar, B. and Ali, S.<br />

20<strong>11</strong>. Salt tolerance in parental lines of rice<br />

hybrids through physiological attributes<br />

and molecular markers. International Journal<br />

of Experimental Agriculture, (ISSN-1923-7766<br />

Online), 2 (1): 1-7.<br />

Conferences/Seminars/Symposia and<br />

Workshops papers<br />

Aishwath, O.P., Mehta, R.S., Meena, R.S., Ali,<br />

S.F., Anwer, M.M., Dagar, J.C., Yadav, R.K.,<br />

Lal, K. and Sethi, M. <strong>2010</strong>. Seed germination<br />

study of fenugreek cultivars with extended<br />

exposure to hyper saline conditions. In :<br />

Proceedings of XXI AICRP Workshop & National<br />

Consultation on Seed Spices held at National<br />

<strong>Research</strong> Centre on Seed Spices, Tabiji,<br />

Ajmer, Rajasthan during July 5-6, pp. 187.<br />

Ajore, Ram and R.S. Tripathi. <strong>2010</strong>. Sudhari<br />

Gai Kshariya Bhumi mein Gypsum Ke Punah<br />

Upyog Ki Aavashyakata Kyon ? In : Proceedings<br />

of the National Agricultural Science Seminar<br />

on Satat Krishi Utpadan, Samvardhan Evam<br />

Sanrakshan hetu Prakritik Sansadhano Ka<br />

Parbandhan, organized by the Bharatiya<br />

Krishi Anusandhan Samiti and <strong>Central</strong> <strong>Soil</strong><br />

<strong>Salinity</strong> <strong>Research</strong> Institute, Karnal, April 22-<br />

24, pp. 135-137.<br />

Arora, Sanjay and Hadda, M.S. <strong>2010</strong>. Coping<br />

with precipitation variability and soil<br />

moisture stress for agricultural productivity<br />

in the rainfed foothill region of the northwest<br />

Himalayas. In : International Conference on<br />

Food Security and Climate Change in Dry Areas<br />

held at Amman, Jordan during February 1-4.<br />

Arora, Sanjay, Rao, G.G., Chinchmalatpure,<br />

A.R. and Khandelwal, M.K. <strong>2010</strong>. Effect of<br />

biological sludge in conjunction with vermi<br />

compost on soil fertility and performance<br />

of cluster bean irrigated with saline waters<br />

in Vertisol. In : National Convention of Indian<br />

Society of <strong>Soil</strong> Science held at IISS, Bhopal,<br />

November 14-17.<br />

Arora, Sanjay, Rao, G.G., Chinchmalatpure,<br />

A.R. and Khandelwal, M.K. <strong>2010</strong>. Utilization<br />

of excavated calcareous saline soils on dykes<br />

of farm pond for vegetable production in<br />

Integrated Farming System Approach. In :<br />

National Conference on Watershed Management<br />

on Sloping Lands held at SCSI, Shillong during<br />

November <strong>11</strong>-13.<br />

Arora, Sanjay, Sharma, K.R. and Hadda, M.S.<br />

<strong>2010</strong>. Degradation of land resources in relation<br />

to soil erosion and agricultural productivity<br />

in foothills of Northwest Himalayas. In :<br />

International Conference on Combating Land<br />

Degradation in Agricultural Areas held at Xi’an,<br />

Shaanxi Province, China during October<br />

<strong>11</strong>-15.<br />

Bandyopadhyay, B.K., Burman, D., Sarangi,<br />

S.K., Mandal Subhasis, Mahanta, K.K. and<br />

Bal, A.R. <strong>2010</strong>. Farm pond technology for<br />

multi-cropping and enhancing income of<br />

marginal farmers in low-lying waterlogged<br />

coastal lands of Sundarbans. In : 9 th National<br />

Symposium of Indian Society of Coastal<br />

Agricultural <strong>Research</strong> on Recent outlook on<br />

Sustainable Agriculture, Livelihood Security and<br />

Ecology of Coastal Region held at Goa during<br />

October 27-30, p. 132.<br />

130


<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

List of publications<br />

Bundela, D.S., Sethi, Madhurama, Meena, R.L.,<br />

Gupta, S.K., Yaduvanshi, N.P.S. and Tripathi,<br />

R.S. 20<strong>11</strong>. Best management strategies for<br />

enhancing crop yield from the areas of low<br />

productivity in the WYC Command. In :<br />

Regional Workshop on Groundwater <strong>Salinity</strong>:<br />

Assessment, Management and Mitigation held<br />

at Karnal during March 18-19.<br />

Chinchmalatpure, A.R., Nayak, A.K. and<br />

G.Gururaja Rao. <strong>2010</strong>. Saline vertisols -<br />

characteristics, distribution and management.<br />

In : Symposium on Salt Affected <strong>Soil</strong>s” during<br />

75 th <strong>Annual</strong> Convention of Indian Society of <strong>Soil</strong><br />

Science held at Bhopal during November 14-<br />

17.<br />

Chinchmalatpure, Anil R., A.K. Nayak G.<br />

Gururaja Rao and M.K. Khandelwal.<br />

<strong>2010</strong>. <strong>Soil</strong> moisture and climatic indices of<br />

different micro-watersheds of Gujarat State<br />

for soil based crop planning. In : 75 th <strong>Annual</strong><br />

Convention of Indian Society of <strong>Soil</strong> Science held<br />

at Bhopal during November 14-17 .<br />

Damodaran, T. Kannan, R. Ahmed, Israr,<br />

Srivastava, R.C. and Umamaheshwari, S.<strong>2010</strong>.<br />

Characterization of mango diversity in Bay<br />

Islands using ISSR markers. In : National<br />

Seminar on Biodiversity in Mango for Sustainable<br />

Livelihood held at CISH-Rehmankhera,<br />

Lucknow during June 25-28, pp.36<br />

Damodaran, T., Rai, R.B., Sharma, D.K., Misra,<br />

V.K., Singh, Balvir, Dixit, Himanshu, Kannan,<br />

R.and Jha, S.K. <strong>2010</strong>. Development of ecofriendly<br />

technologies by utilization of native<br />

isolates of endophytes with commercial<br />

bioregulators to increase the yield and vase<br />

life of gladiolus. In : Fourth International<br />

Conference on Plant and Environment Pollution<br />

held at NBRI, Lucknow during December<br />

8-<strong>11</strong>, pp.173-174<br />

Damodaran, T., Rai, R.B.,.Pandey, B.K,.Mishra,<br />

V.K, Sharma, D.K.,.Ram, R.A., Kannan, R.<br />

and Dixit, Himanshu. 20<strong>11</strong>. Technology of<br />

banana cultivation with subsoil sodicity<br />

management and integration with rural<br />

poultry- A boon to marginal farmers for<br />

sustainable livelihood generation. In : X th<br />

Agricultural Science Congress held at NBFGR,<br />

Lucknow during February 10-12, pp. 92-93<br />

Damodaran, T., Nayak, A.K., Misra, V.K.,<br />

Sharma, D.K., Verma, C.L., Pandey, B.K., Jha,<br />

S.K., Dixit, Himanshu and Kannan, R.. <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

Strategies for management of sub soil sodicity<br />

for commercial cultivation of banana in the<br />

salt affected soils of Uttar Pradesh. In : Global<br />

Conference on Banana held at NRC Banana,<br />

Tiruchi during December 10-13, pp.73<br />

Gupta, S.K. <strong>2010</strong>. Management of saline sodic<br />

groundwaters. In : 75 th <strong>Annual</strong> Convention of<br />

Indian Society of <strong>Soil</strong> Science held at Bhopal<br />

during November 14-17.<br />

Gupta, S.K. <strong>2010</strong>. Raising productivity of sodic<br />

and waterlogged saline soils. In : Brainstorming<br />

on Second Green Revolution-Technologies for<br />

Eastern India held at ICAR <strong>Research</strong> Complex<br />

for Eastern Region, Patna during December,<br />

14-15.<br />

Gupta, S.K. <strong>2010</strong>. Reclamation of alkali and<br />

waterlogged saline lands-<strong>CSSRI</strong> technologies.<br />

In : High Level Meeting of Haryana State<br />

convened by HARSAC and HSCS & T held at<br />

Chandigarh on December, 24,.<br />

Gupta, S.K. <strong>2010</strong>. Strategies for improved water<br />

management in coastal areas for enhancing<br />

crop productivity and future perspective. In :<br />

ISCAR National Seminar held at Goa, October,<br />

27-29.<br />

Gupta, S.K., Raghubabu, M., Singh, A.K.,<br />

Balgnavi, S. and Meena, R.L. <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

Reclamation of waterlogged saline lands<br />

through subsurface drainage techniques. In :<br />

National seminar on Agricultural Sciences held<br />

at <strong>CSSRI</strong>, Karnal during April, 22-24.<br />

Jalali, V.K. and Arora, Sanjay. <strong>2010</strong>. Monitoring<br />

and mapping of salt affected soils using<br />

RS and GIS approach for reclamation in<br />

canal command of Jammu (J&K), India. In :<br />

International Conference on <strong>Soil</strong> Classification<br />

and Reclamation of Degraded Lands in Arid<br />

Environment held at ICBA, Abu Dhabi during<br />

May 17-19.<br />

Joshi, P.K., Raman, Kumar and Rajput, V.D. <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

Biosorption of Pb, Cd and Ni by fungi and<br />

bacteria from liquid medium. In : 51 st <strong>Annual</strong><br />

Conference of Association of Microbiologists<br />

of India (AMI) held at Birla Institute of<br />

Technology, Ranchi during December 14-17.<br />

131


List of publications <strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

Kamra, S.K. and Sharma, D.K. 20<strong>11</strong>. Groundwater<br />

recharge structures for small farmers in<br />

alluvial regions. In : 3 rd Ground Water Congress,<br />

organized by <strong>Central</strong> Ground Water Board,<br />

Ministry of Water Resources, Govt. of India<br />

at New Delhi, March 22- 23, pp.168- 174.<br />

Kumar, Ashok, Singh, Gurbachan and Tripathi,<br />

R.S. <strong>2010</strong>. Sudhari Gai Usar Bhumi mein<br />

Bahudhandhi Krishi Madal Dwara Adhik Labh. In<br />

: Proceedings of the National Agricultural Sciences<br />

Seminar on Satat Krishi Utpadan, Samvardhan<br />

Evam Sanrakshan hetu Prakritik Sansadhano Ka<br />

Pabandhan, organized by the Bharatiya Krishi<br />

Anusandhan Samiti and <strong>Central</strong> <strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Salinity</strong><br />

<strong>Research</strong> Institute, Karnal during 22-24 April,<br />

pp. 124-134.<br />

Kumar, Parveen, Sharma, Neeraj, Kadian,<br />

M.S., Carli, C., Pandey, S.K., Bonierbale, M.,<br />

Luthra, S.K., Schafleitner, R., Gopal, J., Singh,<br />

S.V., Singh, B.P., Rawal, S. and Kumar,<br />

Rajeev. <strong>2010</strong>. Screening of CIP clones for<br />

drought tolerance in Indo-Gangetic plains.<br />

In : Potato Agrophysiology: Proceedings of the<br />

International Symposium on Agronomy and<br />

Physiology of Potato (Mehmet Emin Caliskan<br />

and F Arslanoglu eds) held at Nevsehir,<br />

Turkey during September, 20-24, pp. 76-83,<br />

Kumar, Rajeev, Singh, B.P., Rawal, S., Kumar,<br />

Kumar, Parveen, Sukhwinder, S.V. Singh,<br />

Bandana, Kumar, Pawan, Kumar, Sanat and<br />

Saini, Neeraj. 20<strong>11</strong>. Optimizing crop geometry<br />

of cultivar Kufri Frysona under microirrigation<br />

systems for higher productivity<br />

of quality seed. In : National Consultation on<br />

Production of Disease Free Quality Planting<br />

Material Propagated through Tubers and<br />

Rhizomes held at CPRIC, Modipuram during<br />

on March 4-5, pp. 134-135.<br />

Kumar, Satyendra, Kamra, S. K., Maity, P.,<br />

Sharma J. P. and Tomar Vikas. 20<strong>11</strong>. Farmer<br />

participatory approach for augmentation<br />

of groundwater recharge. In : 45 th <strong>Annual</strong><br />

Convention of ISAE and International Symposium<br />

on Water for Agriculture held at Nagpur, India<br />

during January 17-19.<br />

Kumar, Rajeev, Kumar, Parveen, Singh, B.P.,<br />

Singh, S.V., Kumar, Dinesh, Rawal, S., Kumar,<br />

Neeraj, Kumar, Pawan, Sanat, Vineet, Vishal<br />

and Ansari, Z.A . <strong>2010</strong>. Optimization of<br />

geometry for maximization of French fry<br />

grade tuber yield of processing cultivar Kufri<br />

Frysona. In : Zonal Seminar on Physiological and<br />

Molecular Interventions for Yield and Quality<br />

Improvement in Crop Plants held at SVPUA&T<br />

Meerut (UP) during September 17-18, pp.<br />

229-230.<br />

Kumar, Rajeev; Kumar, Parveen, Singh,<br />

Sukhwinder, Singh, B.P., Kumar, Dinesh,<br />

Rawal, S., Kumar, Neeraj and Kumar,<br />

Pawan.<strong>2010</strong>. Standardizing depth of Kufri<br />

Frysona and Kufri Chipsona-1 for higher<br />

french fry grade tuber yield and better<br />

quality. In : National Symposium on Emerging<br />

Trends in Agriculture <strong>Research</strong> held at PDFSR,<br />

Modipuram during September <strong>11</strong>-12, pp.<br />

134-135.<br />

Mahanta, K.K., Khandelwal, M.K., Sarangi, S.K.<br />

and Bandyopadhyay, B.K. <strong>2010</strong>. Weather<br />

analysis for sustainable crop planning for<br />

Sundarbans region of West Bengal. In : 9 th<br />

National Symposium of Indian Society of Coastal<br />

Agricultural <strong>Research</strong> on Recent outlook on<br />

sustainable Agriculture, Livelihood Security and<br />

Ecology of Coastal Region held at Goa during<br />

October 27-30, p. 186.<br />

Mahanta, K.K., Sahoo, Bhabagrahi, and Sarangi,<br />

S.K. <strong>2010</strong>. A modified Van der Molen’s<br />

model for reclamation of saline soils. In : 9 th<br />

National Symposium of Indian Society of Coastal<br />

Agricultural <strong>Research</strong> on Recent outlook on<br />

Sustainable Agriculture, Livelihood Security and<br />

Ecology of Coastal Region held at Goa during<br />

October 27-30, pp. 62.<br />

Mandal, Subhasis, Sarangi, S.K., Burman, D.<br />

and Bandyopadhyay, B.K. <strong>2010</strong>. Production<br />

and marketing of selected vegetable crops<br />

in coastal districts of West Bengal. In : 9 th<br />

National Symposium of Indian Society of Coastal<br />

Agricultural <strong>Research</strong> on Recent outlook on<br />

Sustainable Agriculture, Livelihood Security and<br />

Ecology of Coastal Region held at Goa during<br />

October 27-30, p. <strong>11</strong>3.<br />

Mandal, A.K. <strong>2010</strong>. Assessment of salt affected<br />

soils in India using Geographic Information<br />

System. In : National Seminar on Development<br />

of <strong>Soil</strong> Science <strong>2010</strong> and the <strong>Annual</strong> Convention<br />

132


<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

List of publications<br />

of the Indian Society of <strong>Soil</strong> Science held at<br />

Indian Institute of <strong>Soil</strong> Science, Bhopal during<br />

November14-17.<br />

Mandal, A.K. <strong>2010</strong>. Computerized database on<br />

salt affected soils in India using Geographic<br />

Information System. In : National Seminar<br />

on Issues in land Resource Management: Land<br />

Degradation, Climate Change, and land Use<br />

Diversification held at NBSS&LUP, Nagpur<br />

during October 8-10.<br />

Mandal, Subhasis, Sarangi, S.K., Burman, D.<br />

and Bandyopadhyay, B.K. <strong>2010</strong>. Marketing<br />

enhancing crop production and reducing<br />

soil degradation in coastal regions of India.<br />

In : Abstracts, 9 th National Symposium of Indian<br />

Society of Coastal Agricultural <strong>Research</strong> on Recent<br />

outlook on sustainable Agriculture, Livelihood<br />

Security and Ecology of Coastal Region held at<br />

Goa during October 27-30, pp. 55.<br />

Mishra, V.K. Sharma, D.K. Shefali Srivastava,<br />

Damodaran, T. and Shahabuddin, Md. 20<strong>11</strong>.<br />

Mitigation approaches for management of<br />

terminal heat effect on wheat crop under<br />

sodic environment. In : X Agricultural Science<br />

Congress held at NBFGR, Lucknow during<br />

February 10-12, pp.276.<br />

Mishra, V.K., Shefali, Srivastava, Sharma, D.K.,<br />

Damodaran, T. and Shahabuddin, Md. <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

Potentiality of horticultural crops for carbon<br />

sequestration under sodic environment. In<br />

: Fourth International Conference on Plant and<br />

Environment Pollution held at NBRI, Lucknow<br />

during December 8-<strong>11</strong>, pp. 6.<br />

Mishra, V.K., Shrama, D.K., Shefali Srivastava,<br />

Damodaran, T., Singh, Y.P. and Nayak, A.K.<br />

and Singh, Y.P. <strong>2010</strong>. Climate Change: An<br />

increasing threat for coastal agriculture in<br />

India. In : 9 th National Symposium on Recent<br />

outlook on Sustainable Agriculture, Livelihood<br />

Security and Ecology of Coastal Region organized<br />

by Indian Society of Coastal Agricultural<br />

<strong>Research</strong>, <strong>CSSRI</strong>-RRS. Canning Town,West<br />

Bengal during October 27-30.<br />

Saini, Neeraj, Kumar, Dinesh, Kumar, Parveen,<br />

Kumar, Pawan, Rawal, S., Kumar Sanjeev<br />

and Rajeev. <strong>2010</strong>. Effect of calcium dose and<br />

time of application on processing quality of<br />

potato (Solanum tuberosum L) cultivars. In :<br />

Zonal Seminar on Physiological and Molecular<br />

Interventions for Yield and Quality Improvement<br />

in Crop Plants held at SVPUA&T Meerut (UP)<br />

during September 17-18, pp. 129.<br />

Saini, Neeraj, Kumar, Dinesh, Kumar, Parveen,<br />

Rawal, S., Kumar, Sanjeev, Kumar Pawan,<br />

Sharma, Vineet and Rajeev. <strong>2010</strong>. Effect of<br />

organic and homeopathic product on quality<br />

of potato tuber at harvest and during storage<br />

with CIPC. In : National Congress on Emerging<br />

Trends in Agriculture <strong>Research</strong> held at Meerut<br />

during September <strong>11</strong>-12, pp. 134-135.<br />

Sarangi, S.K., Bandyopadhyay, B.K. and<br />

Subhasis, Mandal. <strong>2010</strong>. Kalmisag (Ipomoea<br />

aquatica) – A green leafy vegetable having<br />

promise in the coastal salt affected soils. In<br />

: 9 th National Symposium of Indian Society of<br />

Coastal Agricultural <strong>Research</strong> on Recent outlook<br />

on Sustainable Agriculture, Livelihood Security<br />

and Ecology of Coastal Region held at Goa<br />

during October 27-30, p. 149.<br />

Sarangi, S.K., Subhasis, Mandal and Mahanta,<br />

K.K.<strong>2010</strong>. System of rice intensification (SRI)<br />

during rabi season in coastal salt-affected soils.<br />

In : 9 th National Symposium of Indian Society of<br />

Coastal Agricultural <strong>Research</strong> on Recent outlook<br />

on Sustainable Agriculture, Livelihood Security<br />

and Ecology of Coastal Region held at Goa<br />

during October 27-30, 147.<br />

Singh, S.K. 20<strong>11</strong>. Studies on different mode of<br />

aquaculture operation under three different<br />

aging pond fish culture trails of sodic land.<br />

In : X Agricultural Science Congress held at<br />

Lucknow during February 10-12 pp. 13<br />

Singh, S.R. and Verma, C. L. <strong>2010</strong>. A viscous<br />

resistance model for estimating hydraulic<br />

conductivity of soils. In : Indian National<br />

Science Academy, 76:41-52.<br />

Singh, S.V., Kadian, M.S., Patel, N.H., Luthra,<br />

S.K., Carli, C., Pandey, S.K., Kumar Dinesh,<br />

Kumar, Parveen, Sharma, Neeraj, Bonierbale,<br />

M., Gopal, J. and Singh, BP. <strong>2010</strong>. Evaluation<br />

of CIP advanced clones for hot climate in<br />

Gujarat State. In : Potato Agrophysiology:<br />

Proceedings of the International Symposium<br />

on Agronomy and Physiology of Potato held at<br />

Nevsehir, Turkey during September 20-24,<br />

pp. 84-88.<br />

133


List of publications <strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

Tripathi, R.S., <strong>2010</strong>, Bharat mein Lavan Prabhavit<br />

Bhumi Sudhar ka Samajik-Arthik Prabhav. In :<br />

National Agricultural Sciences Seminar on Satat<br />

Krishi Utpadan, Samvardhan Evam Sanrakshan<br />

hetu Prakritik Sansadhano Ka Pabandhan<br />

organized by the Bharatiya Krishi Anusandhan<br />

Samiti and <strong>Central</strong> <strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Salinity</strong> <strong>Research</strong><br />

Institute, Karnal during April 22-24, pp.<br />

67-83.<br />

Verma, C.L., Sharma, H.C., Singh, Rupinder,<br />

Kumar Sandeep and Jha, S.K. <strong>2010</strong>. Design<br />

and development of cheap filter for reuse<br />

of kitchen waste water. In : DAAD Expert<br />

Alumni Seminar on Wastewater and Waste<br />

Management in Coastal Areas Ghana, Accra<br />

held at University of Ghana, Ghana during<br />

February 5 to March 5, pp. 22.<br />

Yadav, R.K., Dagar, J.C. Khajanchi Lal, Aishwath,<br />

O.P. and Anwer, M.M. <strong>2010</strong>. <strong>Salinity</strong> tolerance<br />

of coriander, fennel and fenugreek seed<br />

spices. In : XXI AICRP Workshop & National<br />

Consultation on Seed Spices held at National<br />

<strong>Research</strong> Centre on Seed Spices, Tabiji,<br />

Ajmer, Rajasthan, during July 5-6, pp. 187.<br />

Review article<br />

Sarangi, A., Bundela, D.S., Chakraborty, S. and<br />

Wadkar, S.K. 20<strong>11</strong>. Decision Support Systems<br />

in Water Resources Management – A Review.<br />

WTC-IARI, New Delhi, India, pp.50<br />

Book<br />

Bundela, D.S., Dey, P. and Gupta, S.K. 20<strong>11</strong>.<br />

Water Management and Drainage Strategies<br />

for Irrigation Commands. <strong>Central</strong> <strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Salinity</strong><br />

<strong>Research</strong> Institute, Karnal, India, p142<br />

Burman, D., Mandal, Subhasis, Bandyopadhyay,<br />

B.K., Sarangi, S.K., Mahanta, K.K., Maji, B.<br />

<strong>2010</strong>. A glimpse of <strong>CSSRI</strong>, RRS, Canning Town,<br />

<strong>Central</strong> <strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Salinity</strong> <strong>Research</strong> Institute,<br />

Karnal, India,<br />

Sharma, D.K., Tripathi, R.S., Singh, S.K., Yadav,<br />

R.K., Meena, R.L., Gautam, R.K. <strong>2010</strong>. Krishi<br />

Kiran. <strong>Central</strong> <strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Salinity</strong> <strong>Research</strong> Institute,<br />

Karnal, India pp. 158<br />

Yadav, R.K., Meena, R.L., Jat, H.S., Singh, R.K.,<br />

Lal, Khajanchi and Gupta, S.K. <strong>2010</strong>. Use of<br />

Poor Quality Water in Agriculture. <strong>CSSRI</strong>,<br />

Karnal, MoRD, GOI, New Delhi and AARDO<br />

Secretariate, New Delhi, India, p265.<br />

Book chapter<br />

Arora, Sanjay, Hadda, M.S., Sharma, K.R. and<br />

Bhatt, R. <strong>2010</strong>. <strong>Soil</strong> moisture conservation for<br />

improving maize yields through participatory<br />

micro-watershed approach in the foothills of<br />

the Shivaliks. In : Maize for Asia: Emerging<br />

Trends and Technologies (Eds.Zaidi, P.H.,<br />

Azrai, M. and Pixley, K.V.). Mexico D.F.,<br />

CIMMYT, pp. 467-470.<br />

Bundela, D.S. and Lal, K. <strong>2010</strong>. Fluoride and<br />

nitrate pollution in ground water. In : Use of<br />

Poor Quality Water in Agriculture (Eds. Yadav,<br />

R.K., Meena, R.L., Jat, H.S., Singh, R.K., Lal,<br />

Khajanchi and Gupta, S.K.).<strong>Central</strong> <strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Salinity</strong><br />

<strong>Research</strong> Institute, Karnal, pp. 182- 190.<br />

Bundela, D.S. <strong>2010</strong>. Technologies for enhancing<br />

crop and water productivity in irrigated saline<br />

environment. In : Training Manual-Use of<br />

Geospatial Tools, Models and DSS in Enhancing<br />

Productivity of Irrigated Saline Environment<br />

(Eds. Sarangi, A., Singh D.K. and Kalra, B.S.).<br />

WTC-IARI, New Delhi, p161.<br />

Bundela, D.S. 20<strong>11</strong>. Performance evaluation<br />

of irrigation projects for sustainability. In<br />

: Water Management and Drainage Strategies<br />

for Irrigation Commands (Eds. Bundela, D.S.<br />

Dey, P. and Gupta, S.K.). <strong>Central</strong> <strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Salinity</strong><br />

<strong>Research</strong> Institute, Karnal, India, p142<br />

Chaudhary, S.K. <strong>2010</strong>. Irrigation induced soil<br />

degradation in command areas. In : Use<br />

of Poor Quality Water in Agriculture (Eds.<br />

Yadav, R.K., Meena, R.L., Jat, H.S., Singh,<br />

R.K., Lal, Khajanchi and Gupta, S.K.).<strong>Central</strong><br />

<strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Salinity</strong> <strong>Research</strong> Institute, Karnal, pp.<br />

178-181.<br />

Dey, P. <strong>2010</strong>. Gypsum/amendment requirement<br />

in sodic/saline water- A practical assessment.<br />

In : Use of Poor Quality Water in Agriculture<br />

(Eds. Yadav, R.K., Meena, R.L., Jat, H.S.,<br />

Singh, R.K., Lal, Khajanchi and Gupta, S.K.).<br />

<strong>Central</strong> <strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Salinity</strong> <strong>Research</strong> Institute,<br />

Karnal, pp. 87-91.<br />

Gupta, S.K. <strong>2010</strong>. An overview of waterlogging<br />

and soil salinity problems in three AARDO<br />

134


<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

List of publications<br />

Countries. In : Use of Poor Quality Water in<br />

Agriculture (Eds. Yadav, R.K.; Meena, R.L.;<br />

Jat, H.S.; Singh, R.K.; Lal, K. and Gupta,<br />

S.K.). <strong>Central</strong> <strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Salinity</strong> <strong>Research</strong> Institute,<br />

Karnal, pp. 1-9.<br />

Kamra, S.K. <strong>2010</strong>. Recharge and skimmingopportunities<br />

and techniques for poor quality<br />

ground water areas. In : Use of Poor Quality<br />

Water in Agriculture (Eds. Yadav, R.K., Meena,<br />

R.L., Jat, H.S., Singh, R.K., Lal, Khajanchi and<br />

Gupta, S.K.). <strong>Central</strong> <strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Salinity</strong> <strong>Research</strong><br />

Institute, Karnal, pp. 134-144.<br />

Kamra, S.K. 20<strong>11</strong>. Artificial groundwater<br />

recharge technologies for augmentation of<br />

groundwater and improvement of quality.<br />

In : Water Management and Drainage Strategies<br />

for Irrigation Commands (Eds.Bundela, D.S.,<br />

Dey, P. and Gupta, S.K.). <strong>Central</strong> <strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Salinity</strong><br />

<strong>Research</strong> Institute, Karnal, p13-21.<br />

Krishna Murthy, S.L. <strong>2010</strong>. Breeding for salt<br />

tolerance in rice. In : Use of Poor Quality Water<br />

in Agriculture (Eds. Yadav, R.K., Meena, R.L.,<br />

Jat, H.S., Singh, R.K., Lal, Khajanchi and<br />

Gupta, S.K.). <strong>Central</strong> <strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Salinity</strong> <strong>Research</strong><br />

Institute, Karnal, pp. 199-207.<br />

Kulshreshtha, N. <strong>2010</strong>. Genetic improvement for<br />

salt tolerance in wheat. In : Use of Poor Quality<br />

Water in Agriculture (Eds. Yadav, R.K., Meena,<br />

R.L., Jat, H.S., Singh, R.K., Lal, Khajanchi and<br />

Gupta, S.K.). <strong>Central</strong> <strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Salinity</strong> <strong>Research</strong><br />

Institute, Karnal, pp. 227-232.<br />

Kumar, P. and Yadav, R.K. <strong>2010</strong>. Cultivation of<br />

industrial and non-conventional crops in salt<br />

affected conditions. In : Use of Poor Quality<br />

Water in Agriculture (Eds. Yadav, R.K., Meena,<br />

R.L., Jat, H.S., Singh, R.K., Lal, Khajanchi and<br />

Gupta, S.K.). <strong>Central</strong> <strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Salinity</strong> <strong>Research</strong><br />

Institute, Karnal, pp. 98-103.<br />

Kumar, S. <strong>2010</strong>. Drip irrigation in horticultural<br />

crops : Suitability for saline water use. In :<br />

Use of Poor Quality Water in Agriculture (Eds.<br />

Yadav, R.K., Meena, R.L., Jat, H.S., Singh,<br />

R.K., Lal, Khajanchi and Gupta, S.K.). <strong>Central</strong><br />

<strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Salinity</strong> <strong>Research</strong> Institute, Karnal,<br />

pp.<strong>11</strong>7-133<br />

Lal, K. <strong>2010</strong>. Practical assessment of RSC, SAR,<br />

Adj. SAR and RNa in irrigation water. In :<br />

Use of Poor Quality Water in Agriculture (Eds.<br />

Yadav, R.K., Meena, R.L., Jat, H.S., Singh,<br />

R.K., Lal, Khajanchi and Gupta, S.K.). <strong>Central</strong><br />

<strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Salinity</strong> <strong>Research</strong> Institute, Karnal, pp.<br />

67-69<br />

Lal, K., Yadav, R. K. and Meena, R.L. <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

Characterisation of waste water for irrigation.<br />

In : Use of Poor Quality Water in Agriculture<br />

(Eds. Yadav, R.K., Meena, R.L., Jat, H.S.,<br />

Singh, R.K., Lal, Khajanchi and Gupta, S.K.).<br />

<strong>Central</strong> <strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Salinity</strong> <strong>Research</strong> Institute,<br />

Karnal, pp. 152-160.<br />

Madhu, Choudhary. <strong>2010</strong>. Bioremediation :<br />

pollution fighting tool. In : Use of Poor Quality<br />

Water in Agriculture (Eds. Yadav, R.K., Meena,<br />

R.L., Jat, H.S., Singh, R.K., Lal, Khajanchi and<br />

Gupta, S.K.). <strong>Central</strong> <strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Salinity</strong> <strong>Research</strong><br />

Institute, Karnal, pp. 233-239.<br />

Madhurama Sethi. <strong>2010</strong>. Remote sensing and<br />

GIS for waterlogged salt affected soils. In :<br />

Use of Poor Quality Water in Agriculture (Eds.<br />

Yadav, R.K.; Meena, R.L.; Jat, H.S.; Singh,<br />

R.K.; Lal, K. and Gupta, S.K.). <strong>Central</strong> <strong>Soil</strong><br />

<strong>Salinity</strong> <strong>Research</strong> Institute, Karnal pp.33-40.<br />

Mandal, A.K. <strong>2010</strong>. Geochemistry and<br />

hydrological cycles- source of origin of poor<br />

quality waters. In : Use of poor quality of water<br />

in Agriculture (Eds. Yadav, R. K., Meena, R.<br />

L., Jat, H. S., Singh, R. K., Lal, K. and Gupta,<br />

S. K.). <strong>Central</strong> <strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Salinity</strong> <strong>Research</strong> Institute,<br />

Karnal, India, p. 10-20.<br />

Mandal, A. K. <strong>2010</strong>. In-situ examination of<br />

salt affected soil profile for reclamation and<br />

management. In : Use of poor quality of water<br />

in Agriculture (Eds. Yadav, R. K., Meena, R.<br />

L., Jat, H. S., Singh, R. K., Lal, K. and Gupta,<br />

S. K.). <strong>Central</strong> <strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Salinity</strong> <strong>Research</strong> Institute,<br />

Karnal, India, p. 70-76<br />

Pandey, R.S. <strong>2010</strong>. Drip irrigation with<br />

wastewater in vegetable and fruit crops. In<br />

: Use of poor quality water in agriculture (Eds.<br />

Yadav, R.K., Meena, R.L., Jat, H.S., Singh,<br />

R.K., Lal, K., and Gupta, S.K.). <strong>Central</strong> <strong>Soil</strong><br />

<strong>Salinity</strong> <strong>Research</strong> Institute, Karnal, India, pp.<br />

191-198.<br />

Qadar, Ali. <strong>2010</strong>. Physiological attributes associated<br />

with sodicity tolerance. In : Use of Poor Quality<br />

Water in Agriculture (Eds. Yadav, R.K., Meena,<br />

R.L., Jat, H.S., Singh, R.K., Lal, Khajanchi and<br />

135


List of publications <strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

Gupta, S.K.). <strong>Central</strong> <strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Salinity</strong> <strong>Research</strong><br />

Institute, Karnal, pp. 219-226.<br />

Sarangi, S.K. and Satapathy, K.K. <strong>2010</strong>. Resource<br />

conservation technologies (RCTs): A way<br />

towards sustainable agriculture. In : Stable<br />

Food Production and Sustainable Agriculture: A<br />

Challenge Ahead in 21 st Century, (Eds. Sengar,<br />

R.S. and Sharma, A. K.). Studium Press<br />

(India) Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi. pp. 29-55.<br />

Sharma, P.C. <strong>2010</strong>. Nuclear techniques for inducing<br />

salt tolerance in crops. In : Use of Poor Quality<br />

Water in Agriculture (Eds. Yadav, R.K., Meena,<br />

R.L., Jat, H.S., Singh, R.K., Lal, Khajanchi and<br />

Gupta, S.K.). <strong>Central</strong> <strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Salinity</strong> <strong>Research</strong><br />

Institute, Karnal, pp. 208-218.<br />

Sharma, S.K. <strong>2010</strong>. Physiological mechanisms of<br />

tolerance to salinity and sodicity stresses. In :<br />

Use of Poor Quality Water in Agriculture (Eds.<br />

Yadav, R.K., Meena, R.L., Jat, H.S., Singh,<br />

R.K., Lal, Khajanchi and Gupta, S.K.). <strong>Central</strong><br />

<strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Salinity</strong> <strong>Research</strong> Institute, Karnal, pp.<br />

92-97.<br />

Sharma, S.K., Kumar, S., Phogat, V., Yadav, A.C.,<br />

Singh, A. <strong>2010</strong>. Impact of high RSC water<br />

irrigation on cultivation of vegetable crops. In<br />

: Use of Poor Quality Water in Agriculture (Eds.<br />

Yadav, R.K., Meena, R.L., Jat, H.S., Singh,<br />

R.K., Lal, Khajanchi and Gupta, S.K.). <strong>Central</strong><br />

<strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Salinity</strong> <strong>Research</strong> Institute, Karnal, pp.<br />

259-265 .<br />

Sharma, K.R. and Arora, Sanjay. <strong>2010</strong>. Runoff and<br />

soil loss as affected by different intercrops<br />

with maize in relation to productivity in the<br />

Kandi region of Jammu. In : Emerging Trends<br />

in Watershed Management (Eds. RP Yadav,<br />

AK Tewari, Pawan Sharma, Pratap Singh,<br />

Swaran Lata Arya, PK Bhat, Ram Prasad and<br />

VN Sharda). Satish Serial Publishing House,<br />

New Delhi, pp. 385-390.<br />

Singh, D., Choudhary, M.K., Meena, M.L. and<br />

Dayal, H. <strong>2010</strong>. Raising horticultural crops<br />

under saline environment. In : Use of Poor<br />

Quality Water in Agriculture (Eds. Yadav,<br />

R.K., Meena, R.L., Jat, H.S., Singh, R.K., Lal,<br />

Khajanchi and Gupta, S.K.). <strong>Central</strong> <strong>Soil</strong><br />

<strong>Salinity</strong> <strong>Research</strong> Institute, Karnal, pp. 55-66<br />

Singh, S. K. <strong>2010</strong>. Aquaculture in agriculturally<br />

poor quality of water : An integral part of<br />

natural resource management. In : Waste<br />

Water Management and Use of Poor Quality<br />

Water in Agriculture for International Training<br />

Manual for AARDO member countries :<br />

58-68<br />

Singh, S.K. <strong>2010</strong>. Aquaculture in agriculturally<br />

poor quality water: An integral component<br />

of natural resource management. In : Use of<br />

Poor Quality Water in Agriculture (Eds. Yadav,<br />

R.K., Meena, R.L., Jat, H.S., Singh, R.K.,<br />

Lal, Khajanchi and Gupta, S.K.). <strong>Central</strong><br />

<strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Salinity</strong> <strong>Research</strong> Institute, Karnal, pp.<br />

248-258.<br />

Tripathi, R.S. <strong>2010</strong>. Financial appraisal and socioeconomic<br />

benefits of sodic and saline land<br />

reclamation. In : Use of Poor Quality Water in<br />

Agriculture (Eds. Yadav, R.K., Meena, R.L.,<br />

Jat, H.S., Singh, R.K., Lal, Khajanchi and<br />

Gupta, S.K.). <strong>Central</strong> <strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Salinity</strong> <strong>Research</strong><br />

Institute, Karnal, pp. 240-247.<br />

Yadav, R.K., Jat, H.S. and Lal, Khajanchi. <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

Agro-practices for management of saline<br />

irrigation water. In : Use of Poor Quality water<br />

in Agriculture (Eds. Yadav, R.K., Meena,<br />

R. L., Jat, H.S., Singh, R.K., Lal K. and<br />

Gupta, S.K.). <strong>Central</strong> <strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Salinity</strong> <strong>Research</strong><br />

Institute, Karnal, pp. 77-86.<br />

Yadav, R.K., Jat, H.S., Meena, R.L. and Lal,<br />

Khajanchi. <strong>2010</strong>. Crop growth with high<br />

RSC irrigation water and strategies for its<br />

efficient use. In : Use of Poor Quality Water<br />

in Agriculture (Eds. Yadav, R.K., Meena,<br />

R. L., Jat, H.S., Singh, R.K., Lal K. and<br />

Gupta, S.K.). <strong>Central</strong> <strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Salinity</strong> <strong>Research</strong><br />

Institute, Karnal, pp. 161-177.<br />

Yadav, R.K. Lal, Khajanchi and Meena, R.L.<br />

<strong>2010</strong>. Wastewater use in agriculture: issues<br />

and strategies. In : Use of Poor Quality Water<br />

in Agriculture (Eds. Yadav, R. K., Meena,<br />

R. L., Jat, H. S., Singh, R. K., Lal, Khajanchi and<br />

Gupta, S. K.). <strong>Central</strong> <strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Salinity</strong> <strong>Research</strong><br />

Institute, Karnal, pp. 152-161.<br />

Yadav, R.K., Jat, H. S., Lal, Khajanchi and<br />

Meena, R. L. <strong>2010</strong>. Crop growth with high<br />

RSC irrigation water and strategies for its<br />

efficient use. In : Use of Poor Quality Water in<br />

Agriculture (Eds. Yadav, R.K., Meena, R.L.,<br />

Jat, H.S., Singh, R.K., Lal, Khajanchi and<br />

Gupta, S.K.). <strong>Central</strong> <strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Salinity</strong> <strong>Research</strong><br />

Institute, Karnal, pp. 161-177<br />

136


<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

List of publications<br />

Yaduvanshi, N.P.S. Integrated nutrient<br />

management- An option for minimizing<br />

adverse effects of RSC water irrigation. In :<br />

Use of Poor Quality Water in Agriculture (Eds.<br />

Yadav, R.K., Meena, R.L., Jat, H.S., Singh,<br />

R.K., Lal, Khajanchi and Gupta, S.K.). <strong>Central</strong><br />

<strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Salinity</strong> <strong>Research</strong> Institute, Karnal, pp.<br />

44-54.<br />

Book Edited<br />

Sharma, D.K., Tripathi, R.S., Singh, S.K., Yadav,<br />

R.K.,Meena, R.L., Gautam., R.K., <strong>2010</strong>. Krishi<br />

Kiran, pp.158.<br />

Tripathi, R.S., Modi, B.S., Goel, R.D., Dey,<br />

P., Yadav, R.K.,.Singh, S.K Menna, R.L.,<br />

Kulshrestha, N. <strong>2010</strong>. Satat Krishi Utpadan,<br />

Sambardhan evam Sarkshan hetu Prakritik<br />

Sansadhano Ka Pravandhan, pp.231.<br />

Yadav, R.K., Meena, R.L., Jat, H.S., Singh, R.K,<br />

Lal, Knajanchi and Gupta, S.K. <strong>2010</strong>. Use of<br />

Poor Quality water in Agriculture. <strong>Central</strong> <strong>Soil</strong><br />

<strong>Salinity</strong> <strong>Research</strong> Institute, Karnal, pp. 259.<br />

<strong>Research</strong> Bulletins/Folders<br />

Damodaran, T., Ahnmad, I. and Srivastava, R.C.<br />

<strong>2010</strong>. Diversity of Wild Mango (Magnifera spp.)<br />

of Andman and Nicobar islands. pp. 38.<br />

Gupta, S.K. Thripathi, R.S. Kaledhonkar, M.J.,<br />

Verma, J.P. and Lal, Mohan. 20<strong>11</strong>. Jalgrasth<br />

Lavaniye Bhumi Sudhar hetu Bhumigat Jalnikas<br />

Taknik. Revised Technical Bulletin : <strong>CSSRI</strong>/<br />

Karnal/2009/01. <strong>Central</strong> <strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Salinity</strong><br />

<strong>Research</strong> Institute, Karnal. pp. 8.<br />

Gururaja Rao, Khandelwal, M.K.,<br />

Chinchmalatpure, Anil R., Arora, Sanjay and<br />

Kamra, S.K. <strong>2010</strong>. Groundwater Recharging:<br />

an Ideal Tool for Harnessing Rain Water in<br />

Gujarat. Technical Bulletin No. <strong>CSSRI</strong>/<br />

Bharuch/<strong>2010</strong>/05, <strong>CSSRI</strong> Regional Station,<br />

Bharuch.<br />

Kamra, S.K., Kumar, Satyendra, Kaledhonkar,<br />

M.J., Yadav, R.K. Singh, S.K., Ram Ajore and<br />

Singh, Gurbachan. <strong>2010</strong>. FPARP on Enhancing<br />

Groundwater Recharge and Water Productivity in<br />

North West India. <strong>Central</strong> <strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Salinity</strong> <strong>Research</strong><br />

institute, Karnal India (Folder), pp. 3.<br />

Karpagam, C., Burman, D., Bandyopadhyay,<br />

B.K. and Bal, A.R. <strong>2010</strong>. Agriculture Based<br />

Indigenous Technical Knowledge in Sunderban<br />

Coastal Agro-ecosystem. Technical Bulletin<br />

No. <strong>CSSRI</strong>/Canning Town/<strong>2010</strong>/03. <strong>CSSRI</strong>,<br />

RRS, Canning Town.<br />

Sharma, S.K., Dagar, J.C. and Singh,<br />

Gurbachan.<strong>2010</strong>. Biosafar-biosaline (Agro.)<br />

Forestry: Remediation of Saline Wastelands<br />

through Production of Renewable Energy,<br />

Biomaterial and Fodder. Technical Bulletin No.<br />

<strong>CSSRI</strong>/Karnal/<strong>2010</strong>/04. <strong>Central</strong> <strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Salinity</strong><br />

<strong>Research</strong> Institute, Karnal, pp. 26.<br />

Sharma, S.K., Dagar, J.C. and Singh,<br />

Gurbachan.<strong>2010</strong>. <strong>Research</strong> Highlights of<br />

Biosafar Project. <strong>Central</strong> <strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Salinity</strong> <strong>Research</strong><br />

Institute, Karnal (Folder), pp. 3.<br />

Tripathi, R.S. and Sharma, D.K. 20<strong>11</strong>. Kshariya<br />

Bhumi Sudhar evam Uske Samajik–Arthik<br />

Labh. Revised Technical Bulletin : <strong>CSSRI</strong>/<br />

Karnal/2009/2. <strong>Central</strong> <strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Salinity</strong> <strong>Research</strong><br />

Institute, Karnal. pp. 12<br />

Yadav, R.K., Jat, H.S.,Tripathi, R.S. and Sharma,<br />

D.K. 20<strong>11</strong>. Krishi mein Lavaniye evam Kshariya<br />

Jal se Sinchai hetu Taknik. <strong>Central</strong> <strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Salinity</strong><br />

<strong>Research</strong> Institute, Karnal (Folder), pp. 3.<br />

Technical/Popular Articles<br />

Ajore, R. <strong>2010</strong>. Kisano ke kheto per isabgol ka safal<br />

pardarshan. Krishi Kiran. <strong>Central</strong> <strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Salinity</strong><br />

<strong>Research</strong> Institute, Karnal, 3: 105-106<br />

Anil R. Chinchmalatpure, A. K. Nayak and G.<br />

Gururaja Rao. <strong>2010</strong> Land Use Planning of the<br />

Bara tract area under Sardar Sarovar Canal<br />

Command of Gujarat. Indian Farming, 60<br />

(1):15-18.<br />

Devi, Renu, Sharma, P.C., Singh, R.K. and Dey,<br />

P. <strong>2010</strong>. Boudhik sampatti adhikar ka bharatiya<br />

parichyay. Sodh Patra Samarika: 12th Rashtriya<br />

Krishi Vigyan Samgosthi. Bhartiya Krishi<br />

Anusandhan Samiti and <strong>CSSRI</strong>, Karnal, pp.<br />

166-167.<br />

Dey, P. <strong>2010</strong>. Jalbayu parivartan avom prakitik<br />

sangsadhan prabandhan. Rajbhasa Alok,<br />

Published by Indian Council of Agricultural<br />

<strong>Research</strong>, New Delhi, Vol. 2, pp.14-20.<br />

Dey, P., Jat, H.S. and Singh, Gurbachan. <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

Jalbayu parivartan ki prishtbhumi me carbon<br />

prithakkarran tatha sudharuporant khario mrida<br />

me bhumi upoyog pronalion ka prithakkarran par<br />

probhav. Sodh Patra Smarika: 12th Rashtriya<br />

Krishi Vigyan Samgosthi. Bhartiya Krishi<br />

Anusandhan Samiti and <strong>CSSRI</strong>, Karnal, pp.<br />

90-93.<br />

137


List of publications <strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

Dey, P. and Kapila Sekhawat. <strong>2010</strong>. Bhumi mein<br />

karban prithkaran ke awsakata evam mahtav.<br />

Krishi Kiran. <strong>Central</strong> <strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Salinity</strong> <strong>Research</strong><br />

Institute, Karnal, 3: 14-17<br />

Gupta, S. K. <strong>2010</strong>. Kshariya maridao ke sudhar ki<br />

safal taknik. Kheti, 64 (8): 14-15<br />

Jat, H.S., Singh, Gurbachan and Dagar, J.C.<br />

<strong>2010</strong>. Bhahu-udhesiya krishi model- Niyamit<br />

aamdani evam rojgar ka jariya (in Hindi), Kheti,<br />

November issue, pp.25-28.<br />

Jat, H.S., Yadav, R.K. and Lal, Mohan. 20<strong>11</strong>.<br />

Sanrakshan kheti - Paaramparik kheti ka ek vikalp<br />

(in Hindi), Kheti Duniya, 2: 8-9.<br />

Kapila Sekhawat and Singh, D. <strong>2010</strong>. Khumb<br />

utpadan ke vegyanik taknik. Krishi Kiran. <strong>Central</strong><br />

<strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Salinity</strong> <strong>Research</strong> Institute, Karnal, 3: 52-56.<br />

Kiran Kumari, Lal, M. Kulshrestha, N. and<br />

Gautam, R.K. <strong>2010</strong>. Sudhari gai kshariya bhumi<br />

mein gehu ka beej utpadan khese karein. Krishi<br />

Kiran. <strong>Central</strong> <strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Salinity</strong> <strong>Research</strong> Institute,<br />

Karnal, 3: 35-39.<br />

Kumar, Ashok. <strong>2010</strong>. Samekit krishi utpadan padhti<br />

mein chara utpadan. Krishi Kiran. <strong>Central</strong> <strong>Soil</strong><br />

<strong>Salinity</strong> <strong>Research</strong> Institute, Karnal, 3: 44-46.<br />

Kumar, Ashok, Singh, Gurbachan and Tripathi,<br />

R.S. <strong>2010</strong>. Sudhari gai usar bhumi mein<br />

bahudwandi krishi model dwara adhik labh.<br />

Samarika. <strong>Central</strong> <strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Salinity</strong> <strong>Research</strong><br />

Institute, Karnal pp. 124-134.<br />

Lal, Mohan, Jat, H.S. and Yadav, R.K. 20<strong>11</strong>. Kisan<br />

gehun ka beej utpadan kaise karein? (in Hindi),<br />

8 th January, 20<strong>11</strong>, Kheti Duniya, 2: 5-6.<br />

Qadar, Ali. <strong>2010</strong>. Fasal utpadan mein jasate ka<br />

mahtav. Krishi Kiran. <strong>Central</strong> <strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Salinity</strong><br />

<strong>Research</strong> Institute, Karnal, 3: 5-9.<br />

Sarangi, S.K. <strong>2010</strong>. Management of methane<br />

emission from low land rice fields. Agrobios<br />

Newsletter IX (1): 34-35.<br />

Sarangi, S.K. <strong>2010</strong>. Reducing methane emission<br />

from rice paddies. Intensive Agriculture 49 (2):<br />

8-9.<br />

Sarangi, S.K. <strong>2010</strong>. Cultivation practices of<br />

jatropha – the biodiesel plant. Indian Farming<br />

60 (9): 18-20.<br />

Singh, Randhir, Kumar, S. <strong>2010</strong>. Kisano ke liye<br />

vardan hai poplar ki kheti. Krishi Kiran. <strong>Central</strong><br />

<strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Salinity</strong> <strong>Research</strong> Institute, Karnal, (3):<br />

82-89.<br />

Singh, S. K. and Kumar, S. <strong>2010</strong>. Machhalyo ka<br />

manav jeevan mein mahatav. Krishi Kiran.<br />

<strong>Central</strong> <strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Salinity</strong> <strong>Research</strong> Institute,<br />

Karnal, (3):73-75.<br />

Singh, S. K. and Kumar, S. <strong>2010</strong>. Machhalyo<br />

ka manav jeevan mein mahatv : Lavangrast<br />

prayavaran ke paripekshay mein. Satat Krishi<br />

Utpadan, Sambardhan Evam Sanrkshan hetu<br />

Prakritik Sansadhano Ka Prabandhan, 43 : 163<br />

Tripathi, R.S. <strong>2010</strong>. Bharat mein lavan parbhavit<br />

bhumi sudhar ka samajik arthik parbhav.<br />

Samarika. <strong>Central</strong> <strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Salinity</strong> <strong>Research</strong><br />

Institute, Karnal pp. 67-83.<br />

Tripathi, R.S. <strong>2010</strong>. Gain ka dood amrit tulya. Dood<br />

Ganga. 1:42.<br />

Verma, C.L. <strong>2010</strong>. Sinchai ki naliyo se jal risav<br />

rokane hetu plastic chadro ka satrykaran. Krishi<br />

Kiran. <strong>Central</strong> <strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Salinity</strong> <strong>Research</strong> Institute,<br />

Karnal, 3: 61-63.<br />

Verma, C.L. <strong>2010</strong>. Nadi jal sanyojan ke sambavana<br />

evam sambandhit payavarnia samashiya. Krishi<br />

Kiran. <strong>Central</strong> <strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Salinity</strong> <strong>Research</strong> Institute,<br />

Karnal, 3: 69-72.<br />

Yadav, R.K., Kumar, Ashok and Yadav, D.B.<br />

<strong>2010</strong>. Lavaniye bhumi mein chare hetu raigass<br />

ka utpadan. Krishi Kiran. <strong>Central</strong> <strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Salinity</strong><br />

<strong>Research</strong> Institute, Karnal, 3: 40-43.<br />

Yadav, R.K., Meena, R.L., Khajanchi Lal and<br />

Minhas, P.S. <strong>2010</strong>. Haryana mein mal jal dawara<br />

sinchai ki sambawnaye. Krishi Kiran, <strong>Central</strong><br />

<strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Salinity</strong> <strong>Research</strong> Institute, Karnal, pp.<br />

64-68<br />

Yadav, D.B. and Lalita Batra. <strong>2010</strong>. Vermicompost<br />

evam farm avasesh parbandhan dawara tikao kheti.<br />

Krishi Kiran. <strong>Central</strong> <strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Salinity</strong> <strong>Research</strong><br />

Institute, Karnal, 3: 18-24.<br />

Singh, S.V., Singh, B.P., Goyal, S.K. and<br />

Kumar, Parveen. <strong>2010</strong>. Alu ko chot se bhanye<br />

adik labh kamaye. Kheti. 32-36 & 36<br />

Aiswath, O.P., G. Lal, Anwar , M. M., Dagar,<br />

J. C., Yadav, R. K. and Singh, Ranvir. <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

Growing seed spices a boon in problematic<br />

areas. Indian Horticulture, September : 19-<br />

22.<br />

Yaduvanshi, N.P.S. <strong>2010</strong>. Kshariya bhumi sudhar<br />

mein press mud ka yogdan. Krishi Kiran. <strong>Central</strong><br />

<strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Salinity</strong> <strong>Research</strong> Institute, Karnal, 3:<br />

1-4.<br />

138


<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

PARTICIPATION IN CONFERENCE/SEMINAR/<br />

SYMPOSIUM/WORKSHOPS<br />

Name Title Period<br />

S.K.Chaudhari XII All India Engineers’ Conference – <strong>2010</strong>, Nagpur April 5-9, <strong>2010</strong><br />

S.K. Gupta<br />

Satyendra Kumar<br />

Pradip Dey<br />

R.S. Tripathi<br />

S.K. Singh<br />

R.L. Meena<br />

R.K. Yadav<br />

Participated in National Seminar on Agricultural Sciences,<br />

<strong>CSSRI</strong>, Karnal<br />

Rashtriya Krishi Vigyan Sangoshti Satat Krishi Utpadan<br />

Samvardan evam Sanrakshan hetu Prakritik Sansadhano ka<br />

Sanrakshan held at <strong>CSSRI</strong>, Karnal<br />

April 22-24, <strong>2010</strong><br />

April 22-24, <strong>2010</strong><br />

D.S. Bundela National Meet on Technological Innovations in Agriculture May 21-22, <strong>2010</strong><br />

held at NASC Complex, New Delhi<br />

S.K. Gupta <strong>Annual</strong> meeting of NAAS, New Delhi June 4-5, <strong>2010</strong><br />

T. Damodaran National Symposium on Mango Biodiversity at CISH,<br />

Lucknow<br />

June 23-25, <strong>2010</strong><br />

D.S. Bundela NAIP M&E Workshop held at NAARM, Hyderabad July 5-6, <strong>2010</strong><br />

R.K. Yadav<br />

P.C. Sharma<br />

N. Kulshreshtha<br />

D.S. Bundela<br />

P.C. Sharma<br />

S.L. Krishna Murthi<br />

P.C. Sharma<br />

S.L. Krishna Murthi<br />

XXI AICRP Workshop & National Consultation on Seed<br />

Spices held at National <strong>Research</strong> Centre on Seed Spices,<br />

Tabiji, P.O. Saradhana, Ajmer<br />

Participated in ICAR-Industry meeting held at NASC, New<br />

Delhi<br />

Executive Seminar Series on Geospatial Technology, held at<br />

Chandigarh<br />

Participated in XVII <strong>Annual</strong> Group meeting of AICRP<br />

(Rapeseed and Mustard) held at Devi Ahilya Agricultural<br />

University, Gwalior<br />

Participated in CSISA Experimental Platform Progress-cumhealth<br />

training meet held at <strong>CSSRI</strong>, Karnal<br />

Participated in the workshop on Global Plan of Action for<br />

Conservation and Sustainable Utilization of Plant Genetic<br />

Resources for Food and Agriculture” organized by National<br />

Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources, New Delhi<br />

July 5-6, <strong>2010</strong><br />

July 28-29, <strong>2010</strong><br />

August 26, <strong>2010</strong><br />

September 1-3, <strong>2010</strong><br />

September14-16,<br />

<strong>2010</strong><br />

September 30, 20<br />

B.K. Bandyopadhyay<br />

D. Burman<br />

Subhasis Mandal<br />

D.S. Bundela<br />

Handholding PMTS Workshop of NAIP at ICAR Complex<br />

for NEH Region, Barapani<br />

NAIP Workshop of Component-1 Projects held at NASC<br />

Complex, New Delhi<br />

October 7-8, <strong>2010</strong><br />

October 19-20, <strong>2010</strong><br />

139


Participation in conference/seminar/ symposium/workshops <strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

S.K. Gupta<br />

B.K. Bandyopadhyay<br />

A.R. Bal<br />

D.Burman<br />

S.K. Sarangi<br />

K.K. Mahanta<br />

S. Mandal<br />

Sanjay Arora<br />

9 th National Symposium on Recent Outlook on Sustainable<br />

Agriculture, Livelihood Security and Ecology of Coastal<br />

Region, organized by Indian Society of Coastal Agricultural<br />

<strong>Research</strong>, at Calangute, Goa.<br />

National Conference on Watershed Management on Sloping<br />

Lands for Environment & Livelihood Security, SCSI,<br />

Shillong.<br />

October 27-30, <strong>2010</strong><br />

November <strong>11</strong>-13,<br />

<strong>2010</strong><br />

D.S. Bundela ESRI’s Geovision Seminar held at New Delhi November 12, <strong>2010</strong><br />

S.K. Gupta<br />

75 th <strong>Annual</strong> Convention of Indian Society of <strong>Soil</strong> Science,<br />

Bhopal<br />

November 14-16,<br />

<strong>2010</strong><br />

P. Dey 2nd International Exhibition and conference on scientific,<br />

bio-technology, analytical and lab technology and India lab<br />

expo held at New Delhi<br />

December<strong>11</strong>, <strong>2010</strong><br />

S.K. Gupta<br />

S.K. Kamra<br />

Pragati Maity<br />

Brain Storming on 2 nd Green Revolution –Technologies for<br />

Eastern India, Patna<br />

Indo-Canadian Workshop on Adaptive and Sustainable<br />

Solutions for Water Integrity, Safety, Security and Supply’ at<br />

Chandigarh<br />

December14-15, <strong>2010</strong><br />

January 7-8, 20<strong>11</strong><br />

R.S. Pandey<br />

45 th <strong>Annual</strong> Convention of Indian Society of Agricultural<br />

Engineering and International Symposium on Water for<br />

Agriculture, Nagpur<br />

January 17-19, 20<strong>11</strong><br />

S.K. Chaudhari <strong>Soil</strong> health, sustainability and food security,Dapoli January 21-22, 20<strong>11</strong><br />

V.K. Mishra<br />

C.L. Verma<br />

T. Damodaran<br />

Xth Agricultural Science Congress at NBFGR, Lucknow February 10-12, 20<strong>11</strong><br />

B. Maji<br />

B.K. Bandyopadhyay<br />

D. Burman<br />

S.K. Sarangi<br />

K.K. Mahanta<br />

S. Mandal<br />

D.S. Bundela<br />

Pradip Dey<br />

S.K. Kamra<br />

Status and Innovations of Farm to Market linkages - A<br />

special reference to Coastal agriculture held at Chandkhali<br />

Village of Taldi (Canning I block).<br />

Regional Workshop on Groundwater <strong>Salinity</strong>: Assessment,<br />

Management and Mitigation held at <strong>CSSRI</strong>, Karnal<br />

3 rd Ground Water Congress, organized by <strong>Central</strong> Ground<br />

Water Board, Govt. of India at New Delhi, and presented a<br />

paper entitled ‘Groundwater Recharge Structures for Small<br />

farmers in Alluvial Regions’.<br />

February 15, 20<strong>11</strong><br />

March 18-19, 20<strong>11</strong><br />

March 22- 23, 20<strong>11</strong><br />

<br />

140


<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

LIST OF ON GOING PROJECTS<br />

Priority area - Data Base on Salt Affected <strong>Soil</strong>s<br />

and Poor Quality Waters<br />

1 P1-2005/DBR2.7-ISR-F24.Mapping<br />

salt-affected and waterlogged soils in<br />

Rohtak, Jhajjar and Bhiwani districts<br />

of Haryana using remote sensing and<br />

GIS (Madhurama Sethi, S.K. Gupta,<br />

M. L. Khurana, Parvesh Chandna and<br />

D.S. Bundela )<br />

2 P1-2007/DBR 2.8-ISR-F24. Digital<br />

database on salt affected soils using GIS.<br />

(A.K. Mandal)<br />

3 P1-2009/DBR 3.0-ISR-F10/F26/4230.<br />

Impact of changing trend in weather, soil<br />

and water parameters on crop productivity<br />

in fresh and saline groundwater zones<br />

in Haryana.(Pragati Maity, Satyendra<br />

Kumar, D.S. Budela and S.K. Kamra)<br />

Priority Area - Reclamation and Management<br />

of Alkali <strong>Soil</strong>s<br />

4 P 1 - 9 0 / A S M A 1 . 1 3 - I S R - F 2 0 / F 2 5 /<br />

0010. Integrated nutrient supply and<br />

management system for sustainable<br />

crop production in alkali soils. (N.P.S.<br />

Yaduvanshi and S.K. Chaudhari)<br />

5 P1-2005/ASM3.4-ISR-A00/P00/F27.<br />

Studies on multi-enterprise agriculture<br />

on reclaimed sodic lands for sustaining<br />

livelihood (J.C. Dagar, H.S. Jat, R.S.<br />

Tripathi, N.P.S. Yaduvanshi, R.S. Pandey,<br />

S.K. Singh, S.S. Kundu (NDRI) and N.S.<br />

Sirohi (NDRI)<br />

6 P1-2005/ASM3.5-ISR-A00/P00/F27.<br />

Evaluation of resource conservation<br />

technologies in rice-wheat cropping<br />

system. (Ranbir Singh, P.K. Joshi, R.S.<br />

Tripathi, P. Dey and S.K. Chaudhari)<br />

7 P 1 - 2 0 0 7 / A S M 3 . 8 - I S R - E 0 0 / 0 1 5 0 /<br />

018/0338. Socio-economic impact<br />

assessment of salt tolerant varieties<br />

developed by <strong>CSSRI</strong>. (R.S. Tripathi,<br />

Ali Qadar, N. Kulshreshtha and P.C.<br />

Sharma)<br />

8 P1-2008/ASM3.9-ISR-COO/F26/F28.<br />

Diagnosis, definition and interventions<br />

for salt affected soils in Indo-Gangetic<br />

plains using participatory appraisal.<br />

(Ex Officio Director) –facilitator, R.K.<br />

Yadav, Neeraj Kulshreshtha, Sharad<br />

Kumar Singh, Satyendra Kumar, J.C.<br />

Dagar and Khajanchi Lal)<br />

9 P1-2008/ ASM4.0-ISR-F22/ 0010. Effect<br />

of different land-use system on carbon<br />

sequestration, soil physico-chemical<br />

properties and capacity of these soils for<br />

sustaining crop growth under reclaimed<br />

sodic soil. (Pradip Dey, H.S. Jat Anil<br />

Chinchmalatpure and D. Burman)<br />

10 P1-2009/ ASM4.2-ISR-C00/ K10. Socio<br />

economic impact of tree plantations on<br />

farmers and community lands in salt<br />

affected and reclaimed soils of Haryana.<br />

(Ranjay Kumar Singh and C.B. Pandey)<br />

<strong>11</strong> P1-2009/ ASM4.3-ISR-A00/ F27/ 0120/<br />

0180. Efficient use of organic waste<br />

material as mulching in maze-wheat<br />

cropping system in reclaimed sodic soils.<br />

(H.S. Jat, and Ranbir Singh)<br />

12 P1-2009/ASM4.4-ISR-E10.Economic<br />

impact assessment of zero tillage<br />

technology. (R.S. Tripathi)<br />

Priority Area - Management of Marginal<br />

Quality Waters<br />

13 P1-2006/WQM4.0-ISR-F21/P10/3854.<br />

Recycling of organic farm wastes for<br />

compost production and its utilization<br />

for crop production under sodic water<br />

irrigated conditions. (Lalita Batra)<br />

14 P1-2006/WQM4.1-ISR-P12/3860/ 0600.<br />

Performance study of sub-surface microirrigation<br />

for horticultural crops (fruits)<br />

141


List of on going projects <strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

using domestic wastewater (R.S. Pandey,<br />

Lalita Batra, S.K. Gupta and Ali Qadar)<br />

15 P 1 - 2 0 0 6 / W Q M 4 . 2 - I S R - U 2 0 / P 1 0 /<br />

A00/3862. Developing a spatial decision<br />

support system for suggesting the<br />

suitability of contaminated groundwater<br />

for irrigation and its effects on agriculture<br />

and Public Health in Haryana (D.S.<br />

Bundela, K. Lal, M. Sethi, Mahathi<br />

Parkash, S.K. Kamra, S.K. Gupta and R.K.<br />

Yadav)<br />

16 P1-2007/WQM4.4-ISR-A00/3850/<br />

0120/0180. Organic input management<br />

option with saline water irrigation for<br />

sustaining productivity of high value<br />

crops. (R.L. Meena, S.K. Gupta, Vinod<br />

Phogot (AICRP, Hisar Centre)<br />

17 P1-2008/WQM 4.7-ISR-M10. Productive<br />

utilization of inland sodic/saline soil and<br />

water for aquaculture. (Sharad Kumar<br />

Singh)<br />

18 P 1 - 2 0 0 8 / W Q M 4 . 8 - I S R - P 1 0 / 4 6 3 0 .<br />

Integrated filtering system for artificial<br />

groundwater recharge. (Satyendra<br />

Kumar, S.K. Kamra and R.K. Yadav )<br />

19 P 1 - 2 0 0 9 / W Q M 4 . 9 - I S R - P 1 0 / 3 8 6 0 .<br />

Wastewater use in non-food crops.<br />

(Khajanchi Lal, R.K. Yadav, P.Dey,<br />

D.S. Bundela, S.K. Chaudhari, Madhu<br />

Chaudhary and J.C. Dagar )<br />

20 P 1 - 2 0 1 0 / W Q M 5 . 0 - I S R - T 0 0 / 3 8 6 0 .<br />

Isolation and characterization of arsenic<br />

tolerant microbes. (Madhu Choudhary,<br />

P.K. Joshi and N.P.S. Yaduvanshi)<br />

Priority Area - Crop Improvement for <strong>Salinity</strong>,<br />

Alkalinity and Waterlogging Stresses<br />

21 P 1 - 2 0 0 6 / C I S A 3 . 4 - I S R - F 3 0 / 0 1 8 0 .<br />

Incorporation of salt tolerance in wheat<br />

through induced mutagenesis. (Neeraj<br />

Kulshershtha and P.C. Sharma)<br />

22 P1-2006/CISA3.5-ISR-F60/F30/0338.<br />

Development of salt tolerant high<br />

yielding genotypes of Indian Mustard<br />

(Brassica juncea) (P.C. Sharma and S.L.<br />

Krishnamurthy)<br />

23 P1-2007/ CIS3.9-ISR-F30/ F60/ 0180.<br />

Genetic improvement of wheat<br />

germplasm for salinity, sodicity<br />

and waterlogging stresses. (Neeraj<br />

Kulshreshtha, S.K. Sharma, and G.G<br />

Rao)<br />

24 P1-2009/CIS4.5-ISR-F60/0180/3800.<br />

Search for wheat materials tolerant to<br />

both sodicity and zinc deficiency stresses.<br />

(Ali Qadar and Neeraj Kulshreshtha)<br />

25 P1-2009/ CIS4.6-ISR-F30/ 0150. Genetic<br />

improvement of rice for salt tolerance<br />

(S.L. Krishnamurthi, Ali Qadar and<br />

P. Dey)<br />

Priority Area - Agroforestry in Salt Affected<br />

<strong>Soil</strong>s<br />

26 P1-2006/AFS3.0-ISR-K00/P05/0390.<br />

Biomass and Bio-diesel for energy<br />

production from salt affected land. (S.K.<br />

Sharma, N.P.S. Yaduvanshi, G.G. Rao,<br />

Y.P. Singh, B.K. Bandyopadhyay, J.C.<br />

Dagar, D.K. Sharma, D. Burman, and<br />

A.R. Chinchmalatpure)<br />

27 P 1 - 2 0 0 7 / A F S 3 . 3 - I S R - A 0 0 / K 0 0 /<br />

K10. Evaluation of different biosaline<br />

agroforestry systems for dry regions. (J.C.<br />

Dagar, Khajanchi. Lal and C.B. Pandy)<br />

28 P 1 - 2 0 0 7 / A F S 3 . 4 - I S R - A 0 0 / K 0 0 .<br />

Evaluation of Cactus and Prosopis for<br />

arid biosaline agroforestry. (J.C. Dagar,<br />

Khajanchi Lal, and T. Damodaran)<br />

29 Biomass accumulation and carbon<br />

sequestration of mesquit based forestry<br />

system on semi reclaimed alkali soils.<br />

(C.B. Pandey)<br />

30 P1-2009/AFS3.5-ISR-K00/F25/F27. Treesoil-crop<br />

relations vis-a-vis soil fertility<br />

and crop productivity in sodic soils. (C.B.<br />

Pandey, S.K. Chaudhari, and J.C. Dagar)<br />

142


<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

List of on going projects<br />

31 P1-2009/AFS3.6-ISR-K20. Effect of water<br />

and salinity stress on the performance of<br />

tree species. (S.K. Chaudhari, C.B. Pandey<br />

and J.C. Dagar)<br />

Priority Area - Reclamation and Management<br />

of Coastal Saline <strong>Soil</strong>s<br />

32 P1-2005/CSM3.1-ISR-K00/K10. Effect<br />

of waterlogging on tree species for<br />

agroforestry system in coastal salt affected<br />

soils. (D. Burman B.K. Bandyopadhyay<br />

and A.R. Bal)<br />

33 P 1 - 2 0 0 7 / C S M 3 . 3 - I S R - F 2 7 / P 1 0 /<br />

0010/8145. Use of available brackish<br />

and fresh water in the coastal area for<br />

integrated cultivation of crops and fishes.<br />

(B.K. Bandyopadhyay, D. Burman, A.R.<br />

Bal, S. Sarangi, Subhasis Mandal and<br />

P. Chatterjee (Fisheries) from KVK,<br />

Nimpith)<br />

34 P 1 - 2 0 0 9 / C S M 3 . 4 - I S R - P 1 0 / 4 6 3 0 .<br />

Exploration of artificial groundwater<br />

recharge of fresh water aquifers in coastal<br />

regions of West Bengal (K.K. Mahanta,<br />

S.K. Kamra, S.Kumar and D.Burman)<br />

35 P 1 - 2 0 0 9 / C S M 3 . 5 - I S R - F 2 7 / 0 0 1 0 .<br />

Assessment of salt affected soils and<br />

cropping pattern of coastal West Bengal,<br />

Orissa and Andhra Pradesh. (S.K. Sarangi,<br />

K. K. Mahanta, Subhasis Mandal and one<br />

scientist H.Q. (<strong>Soil</strong> Survey)<br />

36 P 1 - 2 0 0 9 / C S M 3 . 6 - E 1 0 / E 5 0 . S o c i o -<br />

economic impact of improved<br />

technologies in the coastal areas of West<br />

Bengal. (Subhasis Mandal, S.K. Sarangi<br />

and D.Burman)<br />

Priority Area - Reclamation and Management<br />

of Salt Affected Vertisols<br />

37 P1-2005/SMV3.2-ISR-A00/P00/F26/<br />

F27. Integrated farming system approach<br />

for optimizing production from saline<br />

black soils. (G.G. Rao, M. K. Khandelwal,<br />

A.R. Chinchmalatpure and Sanjay<br />

Arora)<br />

38 P1-2006/SMV3.4-ISR-A00/P05/0390.<br />

Salt tolerance of Jatropha curcas (G.G.<br />

Rao, Anil R. Chinchmalatpure, M.K.<br />

Khandelwal, R.L. Meena and M.P.<br />

Reedy)<br />

39 P1-2006/SMV3.5-ISR-P10/4630. Design,<br />

development and management of surface<br />

drainage system for crop production at<br />

Samni farm. (M.K. Khandelwal, A.R.<br />

Chinchmalatpure and S. K. Kamra )<br />

40 P1-2006/SMV3.6-ISR-F27/F22/E50.<br />

Studies on the effect of Sardar Sarovar<br />

canal irrigation on properties of vertisols,<br />

cropping pattern and socio-economic<br />

status of farmers in the Bara Tract area of<br />

Gujarat state. (Anil. R. Chinchmalatpure,<br />

Sanjay Arora, R.K. Singh and H.S. Jat)<br />

41 P1-2009/SMV3.7-ISR-C00/F20/P20.<br />

Management of coastal saline soils of<br />

saurashtra, Gujarat-Impact studies on<br />

technological interventions (G. Gururaja<br />

Rao, Anil R. Chinchmalatpure, Sanjay<br />

Arora and M.K. Khandelwal)<br />

42 P1-2009/SMV3.8-ISR-F21/3930.Bioremediation<br />

of coastal and inland salt<br />

affected soils using halophytic plants and<br />

halophilic soil microbes (Sanjay Arora<br />

and Anil R. Chinchmalatpure, Scientist<br />

from other institute/centre)<br />

Priority Area - Reclamation and Management<br />

of Alkali <strong>Soil</strong>s of <strong>Central</strong> and Eastern Gangetic<br />

Plains<br />

43 P1-2005/EGSM1.1-ISR-A00/F26/<br />

F27/0150/0180. Resource conservation<br />

for rice-wheat cropping system through<br />

intervention of tillage and crop residue<br />

management in partially reclaimed indogangatic<br />

sodic soil. (V.K. Mishra, Y.P.<br />

Singh, Ranbir Singh, and D.K. Sharma)<br />

44 P1-2005/EGSM1.2-ISR-A00/P00/ F26/<br />

F27. Land modifications for increasing<br />

water productivity by different farming<br />

systems in waterlogged sodic soils along<br />

the sarda sahayak canal command of<br />

143


List of on going projects <strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

U.P. (D.K. Sharma, Y.P. Singh, V.K.<br />

Mishra, C.L. Verma and V.K. Varshney<br />

(Sr. Scientist, Fisheries))<br />

45 P1-2007/EGSM1.8-ISR-F26/P10/A00.<br />

Performance of Prosopis species under<br />

different amendments and in-situ rain<br />

water harvesting technique on sodic soils.<br />

(Y.P. Singh and D.K. Sharma)<br />

46 P1-2008/EGSM1.9-ISR-F30/<strong>11</strong>00/ <strong>11</strong>12.<br />

Identification of genotypes in cactus,<br />

banana and aonla for tolerance to sodicity<br />

and standardization of management<br />

practices for economic livelihood in<br />

the resource poor sodic lands. (T.<br />

Damodaran, D.K. Sharma, Chhedi Lal,<br />

V.K. Mishra and Hort. Scientist from<br />

CISTH Lucknow)<br />

47 P1-2008/EGSM2.0-ISR-F05/P10. Study<br />

on salt and water dynamics and crop<br />

performance in waterlogged sodic soils<br />

under raised and sunken beds. (Chhedi<br />

Lal, Y.P. Singh, T. Damodaran and<br />

Scientist from Fishery centre Lucknow)<br />

List of Externally Funded <strong>Research</strong> Projects<br />

<strong>2010</strong>-20<strong>11</strong><br />

1 F<strong>11</strong>-2007/DBR2.9/ISR-F24.Nationwide<br />

mapping of land degradation using<br />

multi-temporal satellite data. Sub-project:<br />

Mapping and characterization of salt<br />

affected soils in Haryana using remote<br />

sensing (A.K. Mandal)<br />

2 Development of spectral reflectance<br />

methods and low cost sensors for realtime<br />

application of variable rate inputs in<br />

precision farming. (Madhurama Sethi)<br />

3 C2-2009/ ASM4.1-ISR-A00/ P00/ F27.<br />

Cereal system initiative for South Asia<br />

– Objective 2 component (P.C. Sharma,<br />

N.P.S. Yaduvanshi and H.S. Jat)<br />

4 P 2 - 2 0 0 4 / D I P 2 . 6 - I S R - P 1 0 / P 1 2 .<br />

Monitoring and Evaluation of large scale<br />

drainage projects in the state of Haryana.<br />

(S.K. Gupta and R.S. Tripathi)<br />

5 C2-2006/WQM4.3-ISR-P10/4630.<br />

Farmer’s participatory research on<br />

enhancing groundwater recharge and<br />

water productivity in North-West India.<br />

(S.K. Kamra, Pragati Maiti, R.K. Yadav,<br />

G.G. Rao, D.K. Sharma, Sharad Kumar<br />

Singh and Satyendra Kumar)<br />

6 C 2 - 2 0 0 7 / W Q M 4 . 6 - I S R - P 1 0 / T 0 0 /<br />

3860/3930. Microbial bioremediation of<br />

wastewater for heavy metals. (P.K. Joshi<br />

and Lalita Batra)<br />

7 C2-2006/CIS3.6-ISR-F30/F26/0150.<br />

National project on transgenics in crops.<br />

(Functional Genomics component)<br />

salinity tolerance in rice. (S.L.<br />

Krishnamurthy and S.K. Sharma)<br />

8 C 2 - 2 0 0 6 / C I S 3 . 7 - I S R - F 3 0 - 0 1 5 0 .<br />

Development and evaluation of salt<br />

tolerant transgenic rice. (S.K. Sharma and<br />

S.L. Krishnamurthy)<br />

9 C 2 - 2 0 0 8 / C I S 4 . 1 - I S R - F 3 0 / 0 1 8 0 .<br />

Multilocation evaluation of bread wheat<br />

germplasm (Neeraj Kulshreshtha)<br />

10 F 1 1 - 2 0 0 8 / C I S 4 . 2 - I S R - F 3 0 / 0 1 5 0 .<br />

Enhancing and stabilizing the<br />

productivity of salt affected areas by<br />

incorporating genes for tolerance of<br />

abiotic stresses in rice. (Team leader:<br />

(Ex Officio Director), Ali Qadar, D.K.<br />

Sharma, Y.P. Singh, T. Damodran, B.K.<br />

Bandyopadhyay, D. Burman, S.K. Sarangi<br />

and S. Mondal)<br />

<strong>11</strong> F<strong>11</strong>-2008/CIS4.3-ISR-F30/0150/S00.<br />

Stress tolerant rice for poor farmers in<br />

Africa and South Asia. (Team leader:<br />

(Ex Officio Director), S.K. Sharma,<br />

S.L. Krishnamurthi, D.K. Sharma, Y.P.<br />

Singh, V.K. Mishra, C.L. Verma, B.K.<br />

Bandyopadhyay, D. Burman, A.R. Bal,<br />

S.K. Sarangi and S. Mondal)<br />

12 Improvement of wheat for salt tolerance<br />

using molecular approach. (Neeraj<br />

Kulshreshtha, P.C. Sharma and S.K.<br />

Sharma)<br />

144


<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

List of on going projects<br />

13 Establishment of National Database<br />

on rice. (S.K. Sharma and S.L.<br />

Krishnamurthy)<br />

14 C2-2006/AFS3.1-ISR-K10/P10. Control<br />

of waterlogging and salinity through<br />

agroforestry interventions. (J.C. Dagar,<br />

Khajanchi Lal and S.K. Chaudhari)<br />

15 F<strong>11</strong>-2007/AFS3.2-ISR-K00/P05/ 8951.<br />

BIOSAFOR “Biosaline (agro) forestry<br />

remediation of saline wastelands<br />

through production of renewable energy,<br />

biomaterials and fodder”. (S.K. Sharma<br />

and J.C. Dagar)<br />

16 Strategies for sustainable management<br />

of degraded coastal land and water for<br />

enhancing livelihood security of farming<br />

communities. (B.K. Bandhyopadhyay, D.<br />

Burman, A.R. Bal, S.K. Sarangi, S. Mandal,<br />

K.K. Mahanta and S.K. Gupta)<br />

Externally Funded<br />

1. Intellectual property management<br />

transfer/commercialization<br />

of<br />

agricultural technologies. (S.K. Sharma,<br />

P. Dey, Neeraj Kulshrestha and D.S.<br />

Bundela)<br />

2. Decision support system for enhancing<br />

productivity in irrigated saline<br />

environment using remote sensing,<br />

modelling and GIS (D.S. Bundela, S.K.<br />

Gupta, N.P.S. Yadhuvanshi, Madhurama<br />

Sethi, R.L. Meena and R.S. Tripathi)<br />

3. Wheat improvement for waterlogging,<br />

salinity and element toxicities in Australia<br />

and India. (Neeraj Kulshreshtha, S.K.<br />

Sharma and N.P.S. Yaduvanshi)<br />

4. Estimating marketing efficiency of major<br />

horticultural commodities in coastal<br />

districts of West Bengal. (Subhasis<br />

Mandal, B.K. Bandyopadhyay, D.<br />

Burman, S.K. Sarangi and A. R. Bal)<br />

5. Holistic approach for improving<br />

livelihood security through livestock<br />

based farming system in Barabanki and<br />

Raebareli district of U.P. (T. Damodaran,<br />

D.K. Sharma and V.K. Mishra)<br />

6. Impact assessment of climate change<br />

on crop production under salt affected<br />

environment of Uttar Pradesh (V.K.<br />

Mishra, Y.P. Singh, D.K. Sharma and T.<br />

Damodaran).<br />

Inter-Institutional Collaborative Projects<br />

1 Salt tolerance studies in major seed<br />

spices crops. (J.C. Dagar and M. Sethi) in<br />

collaboration with NRC on Seed Spices,<br />

Ajmer (Rajasthan)<br />

2 Studies on salt tolerance of sweet potato.<br />

(D. Burman) in collaboration with<br />

Regional Centre CTCRI, Bhubaneshwar<br />

(Orissa)<br />

<br />

145


<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

COSULTANCIES, PATENTS AND COMMERCIALISATION OF<br />

TECHNOLOGIES<br />

• Subsurface drainage for heavy soils of<br />

Maharashtra (S.K. Gupta)<br />

(Funding : Rex-Poly Extrusion Pvt. Ltd., Sangli,<br />

Maharashtra)<br />

• Feasiability study using biological sludge<br />

from Nitro-ETP Plant and treated effluent<br />

from environmental control unit 1 of GNFC<br />

for crop production on vertisols (G.G.Rao)<br />

(Funding : The Gujarat Narmada Valley<br />

Fertiliser Co. Ltd., Narmada Nagar, Bharuch,<br />

Gujarat)<br />

• Feasiability studies on the use of treated<br />

effluent from Aniline-TDI Plant of GNFC<br />

Unit-<strong>11</strong> in diverse crop interventions on<br />

vertisols (G.G.Rao)<br />

(Funding : The Gujarat Narmada Valley<br />

Fertiliser Co. Ltd., Narmada Nagar, Bharuch,<br />

Gujarat)<br />

<br />

146


<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

INSTITUTIONAL ACTIVITY<br />

<strong>Research</strong> Advisory Committee Meeting<br />

The first meeting of the newly constituted<br />

<strong>Research</strong> Advisory Committee (RAC) of the<br />

Institute was held at <strong>CSSRI</strong>, Karnal under the<br />

chairmanship of Dr. Pratap Narain from October<br />

22-23, <strong>2010</strong>. The other members who attended<br />

the meeting included Dr. T.N. Chaudhary, Dr.<br />

P.K. Joshi, Dr. K.V.G.K. Rao, Dr. P.S. Pathak,<br />

Dr. D.K. Sharma, Sh. M.S. Mehla (Progressive<br />

farmer) and Dr. P. Dey. Dr. S.K. Gupta, PC<br />

(SSW), Dr. S.K. Sharma, HDCI, Dr. J.C. Dagar,<br />

HSCM, Dr. S.K. Kamra, HDIDE and Dr. R.S.<br />

Tripathi, Head, HTET were also present.<br />

Dr. D.K. Sharma, Director welcomed the<br />

Chairman and the members of the committee<br />

and presented the progress report of the Institute.<br />

After reviewing the Action Taken <strong>Report</strong>, a<br />

discussion was held with all the Heads of the<br />

Divisions. Based on the discussion, following<br />

important researchable issues were crystallized<br />

to be addressed in future.<br />

• Mapping and characterization of salt affected<br />

soils should aim towards identification of<br />

researchable issues and setting up of priorities<br />

and change detection in spatial context.<br />

• Guidelines should be established for<br />

management of salt affected soils in ecoregional<br />

context and for allocating resources<br />

for research and development<br />

• Multi-enterprise model studies should be<br />

focused on major enterprises in the context<br />

of agro-social conditions.<br />

• Monitoring and evaluation of reclamation<br />

technologies needs to be carried out in time<br />

phases<br />

Meeting of research advisory committee in progress<br />

• <strong>Research</strong> should focus on development of<br />

technologies for ground water recharge<br />

under saline environment and for transfer<br />

of technologies to state agencies for large<br />

scale adoption.<br />

• Drainage research particularly with respect<br />

to subsurface drainage should be included<br />

in core area, keeping in view the drainage<br />

requirement of various states including<br />

Maharashtra, Haryana and Punjab.<br />

• Water management particularly with<br />

respect to poor quality waters (saline water,<br />

sewerage and industrial effluents) needs<br />

strengthening. Bioremediation and Phytoremediation<br />

measures for managing poor<br />

quality water need to be developed.<br />

Staff <strong>Research</strong> Council Meeting<br />

The Staff <strong>Research</strong> Council (SRC) meeting was<br />

held from December 6-10, <strong>2010</strong> to review the<br />

progress of the ongoing research programme<br />

and to take up new research project proposals at<br />

the main institute, and its three regional research<br />

stations at Canning Town (West Bengal),<br />

Bharuch (Gujarat) and Lucknow (U.P.). At the<br />

start of the proceedings, the house observed two<br />

minutes silence in the memory of Late Dr. (Mrs.)<br />

Lalita Batra, Ex-Principal Scientist of Division of<br />

<strong>Soil</strong> and Crop Management, <strong>CSSRI</strong>, Karnal who<br />

expired on 29.10.<strong>2010</strong>. In his opening remarks,<br />

the Chairman Dr. D.K Sharma highlighted<br />

several important issues related to soil salinity,<br />

water quality and climate change. The Chairman<br />

also mentioned about the achievements of <strong>CSSRI</strong><br />

during last one year and congratulated all staff<br />

members for their contribution in securing<br />

Sardar Patel Outstanding Institution Award of<br />

ICAR.<br />

The Chairman urged that the Scientists<br />

should formulate new projects focusing the<br />

newly acquired Nain Farm in order to tackle<br />

complex problems of salinity management.<br />

The Chairman also urged the scientists to refer<br />

the recommendation of <strong>Research</strong> Advisory<br />

Committee for formulating new projects. The<br />

147


Institutional activity <strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

scientists were advised to strictly follow the<br />

time schedule of various research projects.<br />

The progress of externally funded research<br />

projects was also presented during the meeting<br />

for appraisal of the House. Each new research<br />

project proposal was critically reviewed keeping<br />

in view the recommendation of RAC, relevance<br />

to client and technical suitability.<br />

XXI Meeting of ICAR Regional Committee V<br />

The XXI meeting of the ICAR Regional<br />

Committee V was organized at <strong>Central</strong> <strong>Soil</strong><br />

<strong>Salinity</strong> <strong>Research</strong> Institute, Karnal during<br />

January 10-<strong>11</strong>, 20<strong>11</strong>. The meeting was<br />

inaugurated by Shri Parmvir Singh ji, Hon’ble<br />

Minister of Agriculture, Animal husbandry<br />

& Dairy, Fisheries and Co-operation, Govt. of<br />

Haryana. About 140 eminent delegates including<br />

Principal Secretaries/Secretaries of Agriculture<br />

of Punjab and Haryana, Deputy Director<br />

Generals of ICAR, Vice Chancellors, Directors<br />

of <strong>Research</strong>, Directors of Extension Education<br />

and Deans of the Agricultural Universities;<br />

Assistant Director Generals, ICAR, a number<br />

of prominent agricultural scientists, Directors<br />

of Agriculture/Horticulture and Animal<br />

Husbandry of Punjab and Haryana, Directors of<br />

ICAR Institutes, Zonal Project Director, Project<br />

Coordinators, Heads of ICAR Regional Centers<br />

of the Institutes located in the region, progressive<br />

farmers and Programme Coordinators of Krishi<br />

Vigyan Kendras (KVKs) participated in this<br />

meeting. Dr. K.M.L. Pathak, Deputy Director<br />

General (Animal Science) and nodal officer<br />

of the Regional Committee extended a warm<br />

welcome to the Hon’ble Minister of Agriculture,<br />

Animal husbandry & Dairy, Fisheries and Cooperation,<br />

Govt. of Haryana, Hon’ble Secretary,<br />

DARE and DG, ICAR, other dignitaries and<br />

guests. He reminded that the states of Punjab<br />

and Haryana played a key role in increasing the<br />

agricultural growth rate to 4 percent during the<br />

last year. He briefly highlighted the problems<br />

of the region notably those concerning salinity,<br />

sodicity, nutrient imbalance and declining water<br />

table. Shri Rajiv Mehrishi, additional Secretary<br />

DARE & Secretary ICAR was optimistic that<br />

high cold and frost may not affect agricultural<br />

crops in future as our agricultural scientists are<br />

competent enough to tackle the problem both in<br />

the short and long-term. Dr. J. S. Samra, CEO,<br />

National Rainfed Area Authority, remarked<br />

that Punjab, Haryana and western UP are the<br />

food bowl of India. About 60 million tonnes of<br />

buffer stock required for the food security in the<br />

country would come only from these areas. He<br />

emphasized that water table decline is a serious<br />

issue in this belt as the rate is increasing over<br />

the years.<br />

Dr. S. Ayyappan, Secretary DARE & DG, ICAR<br />

and the Chairman of Regional Committee V, in<br />

his opening remarks expressed satisfaction over<br />

the performance of Indian agriculture during<br />

the last year. He highlighted that the food<br />

grains production during the last year could<br />

reach 234 million tonnes including more than 82<br />

million tonnes of wheat and 16 million tonnes<br />

of pulses, which was first ever performance in<br />

these commodities.<br />

Shri Parmvir Singh ji, Hon’ble Minister of Agriculture, Animal husbandry & Dairy, Fisheries and Co-operation, Govt.<br />

of Haryana inaugurating the XXI meeting of ICAR Regional Committee V<br />

148


<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

Institutional activity<br />

In his inaugural address, Hon’ble Minister<br />

expressed his happiness over India recording<br />

notable achievements in agriculture during<br />

the last four decades beginning with the green<br />

revolution in the late sixties. He highlighted<br />

that this productive region is facing major crisis<br />

of the declining productivity and water table,<br />

contamination of ground water, soil nutrient<br />

imbalance, water logging, soil salinity/alkalinity,<br />

toxicity of heavy metals, and conservation of<br />

animal genetic resources. It has not been able<br />

to fully harness the potential in fisheries sector.<br />

He was hopeful that progressive Govt. policies<br />

and application of new technologies developed<br />

by agricultural scientists will help the nation<br />

to meet the growing demand of food grains.<br />

Dr. D.K.Sharma, Director, <strong>Central</strong> <strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Salinity</strong><br />

<strong>Research</strong> Institute and Member Secretary, ICAR<br />

Regional Committee V, presented the Action<br />

Taken <strong>Report</strong> on the recommendations of the<br />

XX meeting and proposed the vote of thanks.<br />

Salient recommendations of Regional<br />

Committee V Meeting<br />

• Due to rapid urbanization, disposal of<br />

sewage and waste water would become a<br />

challenging issue. A meeting needs to be<br />

conducted through NAAS to discuss use<br />

of such water in agriculture production<br />

system. Mayors of corporations and water<br />

user associations should be sensitized on the<br />

technology of use of sewage/waste water.<br />

• Water table decline is a serious concern<br />

in rice growing areas of Haryana and<br />

Punjab. In-situ rain water conservation<br />

through watershed management and<br />

artificial ground water recharge need to be<br />

popularized at the state level.<br />

• Intensive cropping, imbalanced use of<br />

fertilizers and cultivation of high yielding<br />

varieties have led to decline in soil organic<br />

carbon. To overcome this problem, balanced<br />

use of fertilizers, conservation agriculture<br />

with crop residue management, summer<br />

legumes, etc., need to be popularized.<br />

• Fertigation reduces fertilizer dose on one<br />

hand and increases productivity of crops on<br />

the other. Besides, it improves the quality of<br />

product. There is a strong need to develop<br />

fertigation schedules for different crops of<br />

the region. It was emphasized to develop<br />

low cost soluble fertilizers.<br />

• To reduce the cost of cultivation, increase<br />

resource use efficiency and net returns to<br />

farmers in the region, precise use of inputs<br />

is inevitable. There is a need to develop<br />

the components of precision farming for<br />

different crops of the region.<br />

• Green fodder is always in short supply<br />

particularly during lean period (summer<br />

season) in the states. Tree based fodder<br />

production systems (silvi-pasture and hortipasture)<br />

need to be developed in the region<br />

for green fodder availability throughout the<br />

year.<br />

• Rice straw burning is of serious concern in<br />

the region for soil organic carbon loss and<br />

air pollution. Value addition to rice straw,<br />

rice-straw use as a substrate for mushroom<br />

cultivation, composting, feed-block and soil<br />

mulch needs to be encouraged.<br />

• Observations have been made that<br />

compaction of soil, weeds, pests and<br />

associated problems increase after few years<br />

of continuous zero tillage. Investigations<br />

are needed to record the long-term impact<br />

of zero tillage on various crops of the region<br />

for drawing valid conclusions. Low cost<br />

happy seeder needs to be popularized.<br />

• Due to climatic aberrations, extremely low<br />

temperature during January leads to sterility<br />

in mustard. Work on screening of germplasm<br />

and development of frost tolerant mustard<br />

varieties should be initiated.<br />

• Due to global warming yield of rabi crops<br />

especially wheat is getting affected owing to<br />

terminal heat. Screening of different wheat<br />

cultivars for high temperature tolerance<br />

needs to be expedited in net work project<br />

mode.<br />

• Salt resistant pulse varieties need to be<br />

developed and chickpea variety Karnal<br />

Chana No. 1 should be popularized<br />

• Poor quality seed is one of the reasons<br />

149


Institutional activity <strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

for stagnation of crop productivity in the<br />

region. Availability of good quality seed<br />

and planting material in adequate quantity<br />

for all crops is needed.<br />

• Post harvest losses are very high especially<br />

in horticultural crops. There is a need to<br />

develop post harvest technologies for<br />

various crops, encourage establishment<br />

of processing industries in the catchment<br />

areas, development of cool chains through<br />

PPP mode.<br />

• High pesticide residue is being reported in<br />

vegetables from peri-urban area. Hence, biodegradable<br />

pesticides need to be developed<br />

and recommended dose need to monitored<br />

/ popularized.<br />

• Phytophthora is a serious fungal disease<br />

limiting production of kinnow in the region.<br />

There is a need to develop Phytophthora<br />

resistant root stock.<br />

• Desired sex can be assured in animal by using<br />

sex sorted semen. There is a shortage of sexsorted<br />

semen of buffalo, which is essentially<br />

required to increase its population.<br />

• The preference of fish (less bone) product<br />

is high in demand by the consumer in the<br />

region. Therefore, available technologies<br />

need to be popularized through various<br />

agencies. Besides, value addition to low<br />

quality fish would add to the income of the<br />

fish farmers<br />

• The standard of agricultural education is<br />

deteriorating in the region due to inadequate<br />

faculty and facilities. The matter needs to be<br />

looked into.<br />

• Some local or farmers’ varieties perform<br />

better in some settings. Such, material/<br />

genetic stock needs to be registered through<br />

KVKs.<br />

1 Dr. S.K.Gupta, Director Chairman<br />

2. Dr. V.S.Raparia,<br />

Member<br />

Additional Director Agriculture,<br />

Govt. of Haryana, Panchkula<br />

3. Sh. Mahender Singh Mehla, Member<br />

Hansi Road, Karnal<br />

4. Dr. D. S. Sohi, Principal Scientist Member<br />

NDRI, Karnal<br />

5. Dr. Ali Qadar, Principal Scientist Member<br />

<strong>CSSRI</strong>, Karnal<br />

6. Dr. Prabodh Chander Sharma Member<br />

Principal Scientist <strong>CSSRI</strong>,<br />

Karnal<br />

7. Sh. S. George, Chief Finance & Member<br />

Accounts Officer. NDRI, Karnal<br />

8. Sh. Ratnesh Yadav, Sr. Admn.<br />

Officer, <strong>CSSRI</strong>, Karmal<br />

Member<br />

Secretary<br />

In addition to these members, all Head of Divisions,<br />

Assistant Finance and Accounts Officer, Assistant<br />

Administrative officers, Junior Accounts Officer,<br />

Controlling Officer (PME), Controlling Officer<br />

(Farm) and Estate Officer of the Institute attended<br />

the meeting.<br />

Institute Joint Staff Council Meeting<br />

The Institute Joint Staff Council Meeting was<br />

held at RRS, Bharuch on December 18,<strong>2010</strong>.<br />

The meeting was chaired by Dr. D.K. Sharma,<br />

Director and attended by Sh. Ratnesh Yadav,<br />

Sr. Admn. Officer, Sh. Vishal Acharya, AF&AO,<br />

Drs. S.K. Choudhari and R.K. Yadav, Sh. Roshan<br />

Lal, Sh. Tilak Raj Sharma, Sh. Tarun Kumar,<br />

Sh. Subhash Chand, Sh. Ramesh, Sh. Narendra<br />

Sharma, Dr. G. Gururaja Rao, Sh. Randhir Singh,<br />

RRS, Lucknow and Sh. C.R. Taviyad, RRS,<br />

Bharuch. The members discussed the various<br />

agenda items and other related issues for the<br />

welfare of the staff of the Institute and Regional<br />

<strong>Research</strong> Stations at length and settled these<br />

issues amicably.<br />

Institute Management Committee Meeting<br />

During the period under report, a meeting of the<br />

Institute Management Committee (IMC) was<br />

held at <strong>CSSRI</strong>, Karnal under the Chairmanship<br />

of Dr. S.K. Gupta, Director on 15.10.<strong>2010</strong>. The<br />

following members were present.<br />

Institute Joint Staff Council Meeting in progress<br />

150


<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

WORKSHOP, SEMINAR, TRAINING, FOUNDATION DAY AND KISAN<br />

MELA ORGANISED<br />

Training to M. Tech/Bio-technology Students<br />

Four M. Tech. students from the Jawahar<br />

Lal Nehru Krishi Vishvavidalaya, Jabalpur<br />

attended one month training in the Division<br />

of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering in June<br />

<strong>2010</strong>. It helped to strengthen our linkages with<br />

the University. Two of the trainee students have<br />

opted to work in the Division for their M.Tech.<br />

thesis in the division after completing the coarse<br />

work in the University.<br />

Celebration of Foundation Day<br />

41 st foundation day of the Institute was<br />

celebrated on August 18, <strong>2010</strong>. Dr. B. Mishra,<br />

Vice-Chancellor, Sher-e-Kashmir University<br />

of Agricultural Sciences and Technology,<br />

Jammu was the Chief Guest. He emphasized<br />

that the scientists should conduct the research<br />

to sustain the socio-economic condition of the<br />

farmers and conserve the natural resources<br />

for getting higher productivity of different<br />

crops. He also apprised the house that this<br />

institute has evolved a number of salt resistant<br />

varieties of rice, wheat and mustard. Variety<br />

CSR 30 of rice developed by this institute has<br />

made a significant contribution to improve the<br />

economic status of the farming community. Dr.<br />

Mishra delivered the foundation day lecture<br />

on Advances in Rice and Wheat <strong>Research</strong> for<br />

food and Nutritional Security. He also shared<br />

his experiences in converting saline soil into<br />

fertile land of this institute. He stressed that the<br />

farmers should use organic manure for getting<br />

higher and quality produce.<br />

42 nd foundation day of the Institute was<br />

celebrated on March 1, 20<strong>11</strong>. Dr. N.K. Tyagi,<br />

Member, Agricultural Scientist Recruitment<br />

Board, New Delhi was the chief guest. He<br />

delivered the lecture on Water for Food and<br />

Environment: An Overview on this occasion.<br />

He emphasise that water is embed in the<br />

four critical challenges, be it food, energy,<br />

environment are the impact of climate change.<br />

Dr. N.K. Tyagi, Member, ASRB, New Delhi delivering<br />

the foundation day lecture<br />

Most of these challenges would be easily met, if<br />

we are able to manage water. Water is versatile<br />

in many ways and it has both productive as<br />

well destructive powers. Its productive power<br />

is realized in agriculture, industry, energy,<br />

transport and maintenance of health of both<br />

people and ecosystems. The destructive powers<br />

are seen in floods, inundation, soil erosion and<br />

desertification etc.<br />

Training for CADA Officers on Water<br />

Management and Drainage Strategies for<br />

Irrigation Commands<br />

Two days Training on Water Management and<br />

Drainage Strategies for Irrigation Commands<br />

was organized at <strong>CSSRI</strong>, Karnal during August<br />

17-18, <strong>2010</strong>. The programme was sponsored<br />

by Command Area Development Authority<br />

(CADA), Haryana. The participants under this<br />

training programme included 20 Engineers from<br />

Karnal, Panipat, Kaithal, Kurukshetra, Jhajjar,<br />

Rohtak, Rewari, Jind, Hisar and Fatehabad<br />

districts under Kaithal, Rohtak and Hisar circle<br />

Training on water management and drainage<br />

strategies for irrigation commands<br />

151


Workshop, seminar, training, foundation day and kisan mela organised <strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

of the Command Area Development Authority<br />

of Haryana. Dr S.K. Gupta, Director said that it<br />

is the combined responsibility of the scientists<br />

of the research institutes and Engineers/officers<br />

of the CADA to make the farmers aware of the<br />

efficient utilization of each and every drop of<br />

water received during monsoon.<br />

Organisation of Kisan Gosthi at Village Jagsi<br />

(Sonipat)<br />

A kisan gosthi was organized on 7 th September,<br />

<strong>2010</strong> in village Jagsi district Sonipat where<br />

Haryana Operational Pilot Project is in<br />

operation. In this project, the excess salts are<br />

being drained out by subsurface drainage<br />

system. In this area, the demonstrations were<br />

conducted on the salt affected rice varieties<br />

developed by the institute like CSR 10, 13, 23,<br />

27, 30, 36 and other forest trees. Fish farming<br />

has been initiated in the village pond with<br />

saline water. About 300 farmers participated in<br />

this gosthi. On this occasion, the problems of<br />

the farmers were discussed and respondent by<br />

Dr. S.K. Gupta, Director & Project Coordinator<br />

(Saline water Scheme), Dr. R.S. Tripathi, Head,<br />

TET, other Subject Matter Specialists and Sh.<br />

J.P. Verma, Dy. Project Director, HOPP, Deptt<br />

of Agriculture, Haryana. Dr. Gupta emphasized<br />

that the farmers should join hand with the<br />

scientists and do farming in a scientific manner<br />

by growing salt tolerance varieties with low<br />

water requiring crop so that natural resources<br />

may not be deteriorated. Besides, they would<br />

get more yield with low cost.<br />

Hindi Week Celebration<br />

The Institute celebrated the Hindi Week from<br />

14-28 September, <strong>2010</strong>. Dr. S.K. Kamra, Director<br />

(A) of the Institute inaugurated the function on<br />

14 th September, <strong>2010</strong>. On this occasion, he urged<br />

the staff to use Hindi in day to day work. He<br />

informed the house that Hindi Krishi Patrika of this<br />

Institute has been bestowed with Ganesh Sankar<br />

Vidhiarthi Award-2009. During this week, a<br />

competition of Tatkal Bhashan, Tippan Aalekhan,<br />

Aavedan Patra Lekhan Pratiyogita, Computer mein<br />

hindi typing, Prashanotri Pratiyogita, Takniki Poster<br />

Pradarshani and Kavita Path were organized. Dr.<br />

Kamra told that bilingual research publications<br />

are being brought out so that the benefit of<br />

new technologies can reach to the farmers. On<br />

the concluding function, Haryana Ved Vyas<br />

Awardee Acharya Mavir Prasad Sastry urged<br />

the staff to show love and devotion towards the<br />

Rajbhasha creates affection towards the country.<br />

Dr. S.K. Gupta, Director (A) also addressed<br />

the participants and urged all to work whole<br />

heartedly for the upliftment of the Hindi.<br />

The <strong>CSSRI</strong>, Regional <strong>Research</strong> Station, Bharuch<br />

also celebrated Hindi Week from September 15-<br />

21, <strong>2010</strong>. Various competitions were conducted<br />

during the week for technical, administrative<br />

and supporting staff viz; quiz, eloqution, essay<br />

and letter writing in Hindi. The winners of the<br />

competitions were awarded cash prizes and<br />

certificates.<br />

Dr. S.K. Gupta, Director addressing the <strong>CSSRI</strong> staff at<br />

concluding function of Hindi week celebration<br />

Organisation of Kharif Kisan Mela<br />

Kisan Gosthi at Village Jagsi (Sonipat)<br />

A kharif kisan mela was organized on 8 th October,<br />

<strong>2010</strong>. The mela was inaugurated by Dr. R.S.<br />

Paroda, Chairman, Farmers’ Commission,<br />

Haryana while Dr. I.P.Abrol, Director, Centre<br />

152


<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

Workshop, seminar, training, foundation day and kisan mela organised<br />

Dr. R.S. Paroda,Chairman,Farmers Commission, Haryana addressing the farmers during Kharif Kisan Mela<br />

for Advancement of Sustainable Agriculture<br />

(CASA), New Delhi and Former Director,<br />

<strong>CSSRI</strong> was the guest of Honour. A number<br />

of dignitaries including consultants, Institute<br />

Management Committee members, experts from<br />

Karnal based ICAR institutes, development<br />

departments, CCS HAU RRS, Uchani, Karnal<br />

and allied private agencies actively participated<br />

in the deliberations of the kisan mela. About<br />

1500 farmers and students benefited from this<br />

important function. Dr. S.K. Gupta, Director<br />

highlighted the achievements of the Institute.<br />

The farmers were given a glimpse of the<br />

technologies developed by <strong>CSSRI</strong>, Karnal for<br />

reclamation of salt affected soils, use of poor<br />

quality irrigation water, crop diversification,<br />

medicinal and aromatic plants and salt tolerant<br />

varieties etc. The chairman of the Haryana<br />

Farmers’ Commission, Dr. R.S. Paroda in his<br />

address appreciated the effort of the scientist<br />

for doing research work on the lines of farmers<br />

problem by conserving nutural resources.<br />

Dr. Paroda stressed upon to increase the quality<br />

of the farm produce so that we may be able to<br />

compete in the International market. He also<br />

urged the farm scientists to work towards<br />

breaking the yield barrier so as to meet the food<br />

grain demand of the growing population. In his<br />

presidential address, Dr. I.P. Abrol emphasized<br />

organic farming, inter cropping and conservation<br />

agriculture like bed planting, land laser leveling,<br />

direct seeding of rice and zero tillage sowing of<br />

wheat so that water could be saved and the cost<br />

of cultivation could be reduced. He also advised<br />

the farmers to adopt inte grated farming system<br />

model developed by <strong>CSSRI</strong> and to diversify<br />

for vegetable cultivation and commercial dairy<br />

farming for supplementing their income.<br />

Awareness Programme for the farmers of<br />

Haryana on Reclamation Technologies for Salt<br />

Affected <strong>Soil</strong>s<br />

Two days awareness programme for the<br />

farmers of Palwal (Haryana) was conducted on<br />

Reclamation Technologies for Salt Affected <strong>Soil</strong>s<br />

during October 25-26, <strong>2010</strong>. Thirty farmers of<br />

Palwal district participated in this programme. In<br />

his inaugural address, Dr. D.K. Sharma, Director,<br />

<strong>CSSRI</strong> told that Sonepat, Jhajjar, Bhiwani, Jind,<br />

Sirsa, Fatehabad, Palwal and Rohtak districts are<br />

affected by waterlogging and soil salinity. This<br />

problem could be minimized by the adoption of<br />

subsurface drainage technology. Dr S.K. Gupta<br />

said that Haryana Operational Pilot Project<br />

(HOPP) is working in collaboration with <strong>CSSRI</strong><br />

in the successful installation of the subsurface<br />

drainage system in Gohana and Jagsi (Sonepat),<br />

Kalayat (Kaithal), Beri (Jhajjar), Charkhi<br />

Dadri (Bhiwani), Darba Kalan (Sirsa) and Ban<br />

Mandori (Fatehabad). Farmers should adopt<br />

this technology for reclamation of waterlogged<br />

and salt affected soils. In order to sensitize the<br />

farmers, one day field visit to Jagsi (Sonepat)<br />

was also arranged so that farmers could interact<br />

amongst themselves to get a better insight of the<br />

benefit of this technology.<br />

Farmers participating in awareness programme for<br />

reclamation of waterlogged and salt affected soils<br />

153


Workshop, seminar, training, foundation day and kisan mela organised <strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

Organisation of ISCAR National Symposium<br />

National symposium on recent outlook on<br />

sustainable agriculture, livelihood security and<br />

ecology of coastal region was organized by the<br />

Indian Society of Coastal Agricultural <strong>Research</strong><br />

(ISCAR) from October 27-30, <strong>2010</strong> at Calangute,<br />

Goa in collaboration with Dr Balasaheb Sawant<br />

Konkan Krishi Vidyapeeth, Ratnagiri, Dapoli,<br />

Maharashtra and <strong>Central</strong> <strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Salinity</strong> <strong>Research</strong><br />

Institute, Karnal, Haryana. Major themes of this<br />

symposium were, (1) Advances in sustainable<br />

soil, water and crop management for enhancing<br />

crop productivity, (2) Crop improvement through<br />

traditional and cutting edge technologies for<br />

agricultural, horticultural and plantation crops,<br />

(3) Advances in management of aquaculture,<br />

livestock and allied activities, (4) Transfer of<br />

technology, value addition and marketing for<br />

improved livelihood security, (5) Ecological<br />

threats of the coastal region, adaptation<br />

strategies for mitigation and management of<br />

coastal forestry and (6) Recent innovations on<br />

livelihood improvement with special reference<br />

to coastal region of Maharashtra and Goa. About<br />

200 (including foreign delegates) participated in<br />

this symposium. The Hon’ble Speaker of Goa<br />

Assemby Shri Pratapsingji Rane inaugurated<br />

the symposium. Based on the deliberation and<br />

discussions, the recommendations emerged<br />

were (1) Improved soil and water conservation<br />

measures including land shaping technologies,<br />

should be implemented wherever possible to<br />

augment the good quality water for agricultural<br />

practices and best utilization of the resources for<br />

increasing farm income in the coastal region, (2)<br />

Coastal people must be sensitized to the upcoming<br />

challenges arising out of climate change and (3)<br />

development and improvement of crop varieties<br />

through application of cutting edge technologies<br />

Hon’ble Speaker of Goa Assemby<br />

Shri Pratapsingji Rane at inaugural ceremony<br />

may be given special attention for increasing the<br />

crop productivity in the coastal region.<br />

Training on Advances in Reclamation and<br />

Management of Salt Affected <strong>Soil</strong>s for Forest<br />

Extension Officers of Tamil Nadu<br />

A training on advances in reclamation and<br />

management of salt affected soils was organized<br />

during November 8-14, <strong>2010</strong> for Officers of<br />

Forestry Extension Wing of Tamil Nadu. The<br />

major objective of the training was to train the<br />

officers by providing lectures and practical/<br />

field visits on various aspects of reclamation and<br />

management of salt affected soils. The eight days<br />

training was designed in such a way that it could<br />

cover various aspects of sodic and saline water<br />

reclamation and use of saline water in agriculture<br />

and forestry, management of fisheries and<br />

nutrient stress management for sustainable crop<br />

production in salt affected lands.<br />

Training of Officers of forestry extension wing of Tamil<br />

Nadu in progress<br />

Interaction Meeting with Officers of the Punjab<br />

National Bank Farmer’s Welfare Training<br />

Centres<br />

One day interaction meeting was organized<br />

on November 23, <strong>2010</strong> for bilateral discussion<br />

on various issues related to reclamation and<br />

management of salt affected soils and use of poor<br />

quality water in agriculture among researchers<br />

and officers of PNB Farmer’s Training Centres.<br />

In all 15 Directors and Officers of 9 Farmers<br />

Training Centres under Punjab National Bank<br />

from Haryana, Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan,<br />

Punjab, Uttar Pradesh, Chattishgarh, Tamil<br />

Nadu and Orissa participated in the programme.<br />

The purpose of this programme was to acquaint<br />

the officers about the activities of the institute so<br />

that they would be able to utilize the knowledge<br />

154


<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

Workshop, seminar, training, foundation day and kisan mela organised<br />

Interaction with directors of the FTC under the PNB<br />

Farmers Welfare Trust<br />

in their respective regions by transferring recent<br />

technologies developed to increase the crop<br />

production.<br />

Model Training Course on Integrated Water<br />

Resources Management and Use of Poor<br />

Quality Water in Agriculture<br />

A model training course on integrated water<br />

resources management and use of poor<br />

quality water in agriculture for Subject-Matter-<br />

Specialist/ Officers of State Development<br />

Departments was organized from November<br />

23-30, <strong>2010</strong>. The training was sponsored by the<br />

Department of Agriculture and Cooperation,<br />

Ministry of Agriculture, Govt. of India, New Delhi.<br />

Major objective of the training was to familiarize<br />

the SMS with various problems associated with<br />

water resource management and use of poor<br />

quality waters in agriculture and to make them<br />

acquainted with various technological options<br />

for improving and managing waterlogged salt<br />

affected soils for sustainable agriculture. In this<br />

training programme, 21 officers from 10 states<br />

from Haryana, West Bengal, Gujarat, Orissa,<br />

Himachal Pradesh, Punjab, Andhra Pradesh,<br />

Kerala, Chhattisgarh and Assam participated<br />

International Training Programme on Use of<br />

Poor Quality Water in Agriculture<br />

International Training Programme on Use of<br />

Poor Quality Water in Agriculture for AARDO<br />

(Afro-Asian Rural Development Organization)<br />

was organized from December 1-14, <strong>2010</strong>. The<br />

programme was sponsored by Afro-Asian Rural<br />

Development Organization (AARDO). Seven<br />

delegates from Malaysia, Yemen, Syria, Iraq,<br />

Oman, Mauritius, and Bangladesh participated<br />

in the programme. The main emphasis of the<br />

training remained on sharing of experiences<br />

and in depth knowledge on various aspects of<br />

use of poor quality water in agriculture among<br />

respective AARDO member countries. The<br />

training programme covered the basic aspects<br />

of poor quality waters such as saline, high<br />

RSC and waste water, their characterization,<br />

issues related with their use and strategies<br />

developed by <strong>CSSRI</strong>, Karnal, field experiences<br />

and modern technologies for efficient and<br />

sustainable management of poor quality water in<br />

agriculture. This training included the practical<br />

aspects like extent and quality of ground water,<br />

impact of long-term usage of poor quality water<br />

comprising saline, sodic and waste water on<br />

crop yield and soil health and best management<br />

practices for mitigating the deleterious effects.<br />

Trainees of Afro-Asian Rural Development Organization<br />

Trainees of Integrated Water Resources Management<br />

and Use of Poor Quality Water in Agriculture<br />

Farmers Training and Awareness Programme<br />

on the Protection of Plant Varieties and<br />

Farmers Right<br />

A farmers training and awareness programme<br />

on the Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers<br />

Right was organized on December 28, <strong>2010</strong> and<br />

was attended by about 100 farmers and scientists.<br />

Dr. P.K. Singh, Registrar, Protection of Plant<br />

155


Workshop, seminar, training, foundation day and kisan mela organised <strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

Farmers Training and Awareness Programme on the<br />

Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers Right in progress<br />

Varieties and Farmer Right Authority (PPV&<br />

FRA), New Delhi informed about the rules and<br />

regulation with respect to the right of farmers,<br />

researchers and other stakeholders. Dr. Rakesh<br />

Seth from IARl Regional Station presented<br />

information on seed production techniques.<br />

Dr. S.K. Sharma, Head, Division of Crop<br />

Improvement and Coordinator of the training<br />

give a brief view of the salt tolerant varieties of<br />

rice, wheat, mustard and other crops. The farmers<br />

interacted with the scientists with respect to their<br />

problems and appreciated the contributions and<br />

role of these salt tolerant varieties in increasing the<br />

productivity of their fields and improving their<br />

livelihood. Most of them appreciated of the role<br />

of CSR 30, the first salt tolerant Basmati variety<br />

of rice and its impact in terms of its profitability<br />

and spread in the state of Haryana and other<br />

parts of the country. They also requested that it<br />

should be renamed with the Basmati tag. They<br />

were assured that efforts for getting it renamed<br />

as a Basmati variety are underway with the<br />

concerned Authorities of Government of India<br />

and likely to yield results soon as it will help the<br />

farming community. Dr. S.K Gupta, Director<br />

(A), CSSRl, Karnal emphasized the importance<br />

of these rules and regulations with respect to the<br />

plants varieties protection. He suggested that<br />

farmers should also educate other farmers in their<br />

villages with respect to these developments and<br />

hoped that farmers will think about registering<br />

their genetic material.<br />

Training to Subject Matter Specialist of PACL<br />

India Limited on Management of Salt Affected<br />

<strong>Soil</strong>s & Use of Saline Water in Agriculture<br />

Two days training programme on management<br />

of salt affected soils and use of saline water in<br />

agriculture was organized during January 14-<br />

Training on management of salt affected soils and use of<br />

saline water in agriculture in progress<br />

15, 20<strong>11</strong> field officers of PACL India Limited.<br />

Twenty seven participants took part in this<br />

programme and interacted with scientists on<br />

various aspects of management of salt affected<br />

soils and use of poor quality water. Lectures and<br />

field visits were conducted to enhance the skills<br />

of the field officers. In the concluding session,<br />

Dr. D.K. Sharma, Director of the Institute<br />

emphasized that transfer of technology developed<br />

by the institute is quite important as upliftment of<br />

the farmers is the aim of both the organizations.<br />

It should be possible by collaborative efforts of<br />

researchers and various organizations such as<br />

PACL engaged in the field of agriculture.<br />

Stakeholders’ Capacity Building Training<br />

under NAIP Project on DSS<br />

One Day Stakeholders’ Capacity Building<br />

Training under NAIP Sub-project on “Decision<br />

Support System for Enhancing Productivity<br />

in Irrigated Saline Environment using<br />

RemoteSensing, Modelling and GIS” was held<br />

on 28 January 20<strong>11</strong>. About 170 farmers and<br />

canal water user association members from 12<br />

villages under Butana distributarycommand<br />

area (Jagsi, Gangana, Butana, Khanpur Khurd,<br />

Ahulana, Dhanana, Shamlo Kalan, Rindana,<br />

Banwasa, Chhichhrana and Rukhi in Sonipat<br />

district, and Sanghi in Rohtak district) attended<br />

the training. Dr. S.K. Kamra, Head, Division of<br />

Irrigation & Drainage Engg; Dr. S.K. Gupta,<br />

Project Coordinator (SWS); and Dr. R.S. Tripathi,<br />

Head, Division of Technology Evaluation &<br />

Transfer; Er. Rakesh Chauhan, Superintending<br />

Engineer, Command Area Development (CAD)<br />

Circle, Kaithal; Er. Tarun Aggarwal, Executive<br />

Engineer, CAD Division, Karnal; and Er. J.P.<br />

Verma, Deputy Project Director, Haryana<br />

156


<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

Workshop, seminar, training, foundation day and kisan mela organised<br />

Dr. D.K. Sharma, Director <strong>CSSRI</strong> inaugurated the Stakeholder’s Capacity building training programme<br />

Operational Pilot Project (HOPP), Agricultural<br />

Department, Karnal along with the project<br />

partners and <strong>CSSRI</strong> scientists participated.<br />

In the inaugural address, Dr. D.K. Sharma,<br />

Director, <strong>CSSRI</strong>, appealed to the stakeholders<br />

(farmers) for growing more foods with less<br />

water by adopting scientific methods in view<br />

of shrinking share of canal water in coming<br />

years, ongoing secondary salinization and<br />

waterlogging in the canal command. He stressed<br />

on the use of the technologies developed by<br />

the institute for reclamation of salt-affected<br />

soils and poor quality waters, and growing salt<br />

tolerant varieties of mustard and wheat in the<br />

salt affected lands. Dr. D.S. Bundela, Principal<br />

Scientist & Consortium Principal Investigator<br />

(CPI) presented the project achievements and<br />

field demonstrations undertaken at farmers’<br />

fields with emphasis on stakeholder problems<br />

in the Butana distributary command.<br />

Senior Officers’ Capacity Building Training<br />

Programme under NAIP DSS Project<br />

A Five Days Senior Officers’ (Stakeholders)<br />

Capacity Building Training Programme on<br />

Applications of Modern Tools for Enhancing<br />

Productivity in Irrigated Saline Environment<br />

under NAIP-DSS Project was held during 1-5<br />

March 20<strong>11</strong>. Twenty senior officers- nine from<br />

Command Area Development Agency, six from<br />

Agriculture Departments, and five from KVKs<br />

in the Western Yamuna Canal (WYC) command,<br />

Haryana, participated in the training. Among the<br />

20 participants, Deputy Director (<strong>Soil</strong> Testing),<br />

Karnal, Sh. M.L. Khurana; Deputy Director<br />

(Agriculture), Karnal, Sh. Devinder Malik, and<br />

Deputy Director (Agriculture), Panipat, Sh. R.P.<br />

Sihag; District <strong>Soil</strong> Conservation Officer, Karnal<br />

Sh. O.P. Godara and District <strong>Soil</strong> Conservation<br />

Senior Officers attended a capacity building training<br />

programme<br />

Officer, Panipat, Sh. Anil Kumar, 5 Senior District<br />

Extension Officers and 5 SDO from CADA<br />

were the senior officers in the training. Dr. D.S.<br />

Bundela, Consortium Principal Investigator<br />

(CPI) and Course Director welcomed the<br />

participants and presented the objectives of the<br />

training programme. He highlighted the project<br />

achievements including field demonstrations<br />

at farmers’ fields with emphasis on stakeholder<br />

problems in the mid and tail reaches of the<br />

WYC command. He drew attention to a unique<br />

feature/strength of the project-stakeholder. In his<br />

concluding remarks, Dr. D.K. Sharma, Director,<br />

<strong>CSSRI</strong> emphasized the role of modern tools for<br />

generating accurate and reliable databases on<br />

irrigation water, crops and soils for mapping and<br />

monitoring of productivity in canal commands for<br />

planning effective water management strategies<br />

for growing more food with scientific methods<br />

in view of lesser availability of canal water in<br />

coming years, use of saline groundwater, ongoing<br />

secondary soil salinization and waterlogging in<br />

the canal command.<br />

Organisation of rabi Kisan Mela<br />

A rabi kisan mela was organized on 1 st<br />

March, 20<strong>11</strong>. The mela was inaugurated by<br />

Dr. N.K.Tyagi, Member, Agricultural<br />

Scientist Recruitment Board, New Delhi and<br />

157


Workshop, seminar, training, foundation day and kisan mela organised <strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

Dr. N.K. Tyagi, Member, ASRB, New Delhi addressing the farmers on the occasion of rabi kisan mela<br />

Sh. V.S. Rapadia, Additional Director<br />

(Agriculture) was the Guest of Honour. A<br />

number of dignitaries including consultants,<br />

Institute Management Committee members,<br />

experts from Karnal based ICAR institutes,<br />

development departments, CCS HAU RRS,<br />

Uchani, Karnal actively participated in the<br />

deliberations of the kisan mela. About 1000<br />

farmers and students were benefited from this<br />

function. Dr. D.K. Sharma, Director <strong>CSSRI</strong>,<br />

highlighted the achievements of the Institute.<br />

He said about 1.85 million hectare land has been<br />

reclaimed by the institute in the states of Haryana,<br />

Punjab and Uttar Pradesh. He also elaborated<br />

upon the recent initiatives taken by the Institute<br />

particularly in the field of multiple use of<br />

water, resources conservation technologies etc.<br />

Dr. N.K. Tyagi has advised the farmers to adopt<br />

integrated farming model which is a viable<br />

option in view of the declining water table and<br />

shrinking land holdings. He appreciated the<br />

efforts of Haryana farmers for producing very<br />

good yield of rice and wheat even with poor<br />

quality water. He also highlighted the problem<br />

of water scarcity and per capita reduction in<br />

water availability in India and the need for<br />

increased foodgrain requirements of growing<br />

population. Sh. V.S. Rapardia, Additional<br />

Director (Agriculture), Govt. of Haryana said<br />

that Haryana bags 2 nd place in the contribution<br />

of food grain to food basket of the country. In<br />

the production of basmati rice, the state is at the<br />

top of the country. He also apprised the farmers<br />

about the various schemes/programmes/<br />

incentives run by Haryana and <strong>Central</strong> Govt. for<br />

the benefit of the farmers. To address the water<br />

scarcity in the State, he requested the farmers not<br />

to do paddy transplanting before June 15. Some<br />

NGOs also displayed seeds, fertilizers, pesticides<br />

and agricultural implements. Field visits were<br />

organized in which scientists interacted with<br />

farmers and discussed their problems. Farmers<br />

were informed about technologies developed<br />

at <strong>CSSRI</strong> for reclaimation of salt affected soils,<br />

use of poor quality water, crop diversification,<br />

medicinal and aromatic plants and sallt tolerant<br />

varieties etc. Seeds of rice varieties Pusa 44, Pusa<br />

<strong>11</strong>21, CSR 10, 13, 23, 27 and 36 were sold during<br />

the mela. <strong>Soil</strong> and water samples brought by<br />

farmers were tested free of cost in the mela.<br />

Twenty progressive farmers including 3 women<br />

farmers of Haryana were felicitated during<br />

the mela. Prizes were also given to four best<br />

exhibition stalls in different categories. Nearly<br />

1000 farmers and school students benefited<br />

from the kisan mela.<br />

Field exhibition and visits<br />

Seven field exhibitions were organized<br />

in problematic areas in reclamation and<br />

management of salt affected soils and use of<br />

poor quality waters in agriculture. Large number<br />

of farmers and extension personnel visited<br />

the stalls and acquainted themselves with the<br />

technologies developed by the Institute. During<br />

the year, 716 farmers in 17 groups, 82 extension<br />

personnel in 10 groups, 489 agriculture graduates<br />

in 7 groups and 10 scientists in 2 groups from<br />

India and abroad visited the Institute.<br />

Advisory Services to the Stakeholders<br />

A toll free telephone number (18001801014) is in<br />

operation at the Institute, a large number of quarries<br />

are being asked by the farmers and answered by<br />

the institute’s scientists during each working day.<br />

These quarries are related to reclamation and<br />

management of sodic and saline soil, use of poor<br />

quality water in agriculture and performance of<br />

salt tolerant varieties of different crops.<br />

158


<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

LIST OF SCIENTIFIC, TECHNICAL AND<br />

ADMINISTRATIVE PERSONNEL<br />

Dinesh Kumar Sharma, Ph.D., Director (21.10.<strong>2010</strong>) b<br />

S.K. Gupta, Ph.D., Director (A) (20.10.<strong>2010</strong>) a<br />

Ram Ajore, Ph.D., Director (A) (30.6.<strong>2010</strong>) c<br />

Division of <strong>Soil</strong> and Crop Management<br />

J.C. Dagar, Ph.D. Head (3.<strong>11</strong>.<strong>2010</strong>) a<br />

Madhurma Sethi, Ph.D. (3.<strong>11</strong>.<strong>2010</strong>) b<br />

Lalita Batra, Ph.D.(29.10.<strong>2010</strong>) d<br />

P.K. Joshi, Ph.D.<br />

N.P.S. Yaduvanshi, Ph.D.<br />

Pradip Dey, Ph.D.<br />

C.B. Panday, Ph.D.<br />

S.K.Chaudhari, Ph.D.<br />

Ranbir Singh, Ph.D.<br />

Khajanchi Lal, Ph.D ( 22.3.20<strong>11</strong>) a<br />

A.K. Mandal, Ph.D.<br />

R.K. Yadav, Ph.D.<br />

Sharad Kumar Singh, Ph.D.<br />

H.S. Jat, Ph.D.<br />

Gajender Yadav, M.Sc.<br />

Madhu Chaudhary, M.Sc.<br />

Technical Officers<br />

Bharat Bhushan, M.A.<br />

Arjen Kumar, M.A.<br />

T.N. Khurana, B.Sc.<br />

Naresh Kumar, M.Sc.<br />

Rati Ram<br />

Division of Crop Improvement<br />

S.K. Sharma, Ph.D. Head<br />

Ali Qadar, Ph.D.<br />

Parbodh Chander Sharma, Ph.D.<br />

R.K. Gautam, Ph.D.(28.8.<strong>2010</strong>) a<br />

Neeraj Kulshreshtha, Ph.D.<br />

S.L.Krishna Murthy, Ph.D<br />

Technical Officers<br />

P.S.Tomar, B.Sc. (Ag.)<br />

Division of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering<br />

S.K. Kamra, Ph.D., Head<br />

R.S. Pandey, Ph.D.<br />

D.S. Bundela, Ph.D.<br />

Satyender Kumar, Ph.D.<br />

Pragati Maity, Ph.D.<br />

Technical Officers<br />

Rajiv Kumar, M.Sc.<br />

S.K. Srivastava, Dip. Auto. Engg.<br />

Jai Parkash, M.Sc.<br />

S.K. Dahiya<br />

Jai Narain (31.3.20<strong>11</strong>) c<br />

Ram Pal<br />

Mahabir Singh<br />

Brij Mohan<br />

Sat Pal<br />

Radhey Sham<br />

Division of Technology Evaluation & Transfer<br />

Ram Ajore, Ph.D., Head (30.6.<strong>2010</strong>) c<br />

R.S.Tripathi, Ph.D. (26.8.<strong>2010</strong>)<br />

R.K. Singh, Ph.D.<br />

R. Raju, Ph. D.<br />

Parveen Kumar, Ph.D.<br />

Technical Officers<br />

S.K. Tyagi, Ph.D.<br />

Anil Sharma, M.A.<br />

AICRP (Saline Water)<br />

S.K.Gupta, Ph.D., Project Coordinator<br />

Anil R. Chinchmalatpure, Ph.D.<br />

R.L. Meena, Ph.D.<br />

Technical Officers<br />

Brij Mohan, M.Sc.<br />

S.P. Gupta, Dip. Elect. Engg.<br />

Regional <strong>Research</strong> Station, Canning Town<br />

B. Maji, Ph.D., Head (01.12.<strong>2010</strong>) b<br />

B. K. Bandyopadhyay, Ph. D, LL.B.(30.<strong>11</strong>.<strong>2010</strong>) a<br />

A. R. Bal, Ph. D. (31.12.<strong>2010</strong>) c<br />

D. Burman, Ph. D.<br />

S.K. Sarangi, Ph. D.<br />

Subhasis Mandal, Ph. D.<br />

K.K. Mahanta, Ph. D.<br />

Technical Officers<br />

Deepak Roy, B.Sc., AIC<br />

D.D. Majhi, B.Sc. (Ag.)<br />

D. Pal, Ph. D.<br />

A.B. Mondal, ITI<br />

Sivaji Roy<br />

P. K. Dhar, B. Sc.<br />

Srimati Roy, B. Sc.<br />

L.K. Nayak<br />

M.Haldar<br />

D. Mukharjee<br />

159


List of scientific, technical and administrative personnel <strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

PS to the Head<br />

A. K. Nandi, B. Sc.<br />

Regional <strong>Research</strong> Station, Bharuch<br />

G. Gururaja Rao, Ph.D., Head<br />

M.K. Khandelwal, Ph.D.<br />

Sanjay Arora, Ph.D.<br />

Technical Officer<br />

M.V.S. Rajeshwar Rao, M.Sc.<br />

Regional <strong>Research</strong> Station, Lucknow<br />

D.K. Sharma, Ph.D., Head (20.10.<strong>2010</strong>) a<br />

V.K. Mishra, Ph.D. Head (21.10.<strong>2010</strong>) b<br />

Y.P. Singh, Ph.D.<br />

Chhedi Lal Verma, Ph.D.<br />

T. Damodaran, Ph.D.<br />

Technical Officers<br />

S.K. Jha, Ph.D.<br />

C.S. Singh, Ph.D.<br />

Hari Mohan Verma, M.Tech.<br />

Administrative and Supporting Sections<br />

Administration<br />

Ratnesh Kumar Yadav, SAO, (29.1.20<strong>11</strong>) a<br />

Abhishek Srivastava, Admn. Officer (7.3.20<strong>11</strong>) b<br />

Vishal Acharya, AF&AO (<strong>11</strong>.3.20<strong>11</strong>) a<br />

Ved Parkash, F.A.O. (7.3.20<strong>11</strong>) b<br />

M.V.N.Rao, Jr. Accounts Officer (30.9.<strong>2010</strong>) a<br />

A.K.Kathuria J.A.O. (19.10.<strong>2010</strong>) b<br />

V.S.Negi, Asstt. Admn. Officer (31.3.20<strong>11</strong>) c<br />

A.K.Mishra, Asstt. Admn. Officer<br />

D.R.Khurana, Asstt. Admn. Officer (31.10.<strong>2010</strong>) c<br />

Som Singh, Asstt. Admn. Officer (1.<strong>11</strong>.<strong>2010</strong>) b<br />

Prakash Chand, A.A.O. (28.2.20<strong>11</strong>) c<br />

S.K.Goel, Asstt. Admn. Officer (1.3.20<strong>11</strong>) b<br />

RTI Cell<br />

Parbodh Chander Sharma, Ph.D., CPIO<br />

S.K. Sharma, M.Sc. (Ag. Ext.), APIO<br />

Transparency Officer<br />

R.S. Tripathi, Ph.D.<br />

PME Cell<br />

Pradip Dey, Ph.D., OIC<br />

Institute Technology Management Unit<br />

S.K. Sharma, Ph.D.<br />

Pradip Dey, Ph.D.<br />

D.S. Bundela, Ph.D.<br />

Neeraj Kulshreshtha, Ph.D.<br />

R.K. Singh, Ph.D.<br />

Technical Officer<br />

Sushil Kumar, Ph.D (7.6.<strong>2010</strong>) a<br />

Vijay Kumar, B.Sc., M.A.<br />

Publication and Supporting Services Unit<br />

Pradip Dey, Ph.D., CO<br />

Randhir Singh, M.Sc. OIC<br />

Madan Singh, M. Sc. (Geography)<br />

Hindi Cell<br />

R.S. Tripathi, Ph.D., OIC<br />

Technical Officers<br />

Rashmi Sharma, M.A.<br />

Director Cell<br />

B.D. Khurana ( 28.2.20<strong>11</strong>) c<br />

Tilak Raj<br />

Mange Ram<br />

Public Relation Officer<br />

S.K. Sharma, M.Sc. (Ag.), PRO<br />

PS to Heads<br />

R.K. Dahiya<br />

R.K. Bhatia<br />

Dinesh Gugnani<br />

Rita Ahuja<br />

Sunita Dhingra<br />

Farm Section<br />

Surinder Mohan, B.Sc., Farm Manager<br />

Chander Gupt<br />

Shankar Mehto (31.12.<strong>2010</strong> ) c<br />

Roshan Lal<br />

Samey Singh<br />

Library<br />

Meena Luthra, M.A.<br />

Medical Unit<br />

Dr. (Mrs.) Mahathi Parkash M.B.B.S. S.M.O.<br />

Technical Officer<br />

Chanchal Rani<br />

Estate Section<br />

Randhir Singh, M.Sc.<br />

H.S. Tomar, M.A.<br />

N.K. Vaid, M. Tech.<br />

Ashwani Kumar, Dip.in Machinist<br />

Kulbir Singh, Dip. in Civil Engineering<br />

* Superscripts a, b, c and d refer to date of relieving, joining, superannuating and expiring, respectively<br />

160


<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

<strong>CSSRI</strong> STAFF POSITION<br />

Statement showing the total number of employees and the number of Scheduled Castes (SC)/ Scheduled<br />

Tribes (ST) from 1.4.<strong>2010</strong> to 31.3.20<strong>11</strong><br />

Group/ class<br />

Class-1 permanent<br />

other than lowest<br />

rung of Class-1<br />

Lowest rung of<br />

Class-1<br />

Number of employees Scheduled Castes Scheduled Tribes<br />

Temporary Permanent Total No.<br />

% of<br />

total<br />

No.<br />

% of total<br />

- 51 51 1 1.96 1 1.96<br />

4 16 20 2 10.00 1 5.00<br />

Class-II - 77 77 20 25.97 3 3.89<br />

Class-III 6 50 56 8 14.28 6 10.71<br />

Class-IV<br />

sweepers)<br />

Class-IV<br />

sweepers)<br />

(excluding<br />

(only<br />

2 78 80 24 30.00 5 6.25<br />

- <strong>11</strong> <strong>11</strong> <strong>11</strong> 100.00 - -<br />

Total 12 283 295 66 22.37 16 5.42<br />

Statement of Scheduled Castes (SC) and Scheduled Tribes (ST)<br />

Statement showing the number of reserved vacancies filled by Scheduled Castes (SC)/Scheduled<br />

Tribes (ST) as on 31.3.20<strong>11</strong><br />

Classified<br />

posts<br />

Total Vacancies Scheduled Castes Scheduled Tribes<br />

Notified Filled Notified Filled Notified Filled<br />

Direct Recruitment<br />

Class-I - - - - - -<br />

Class-II - - - - - -<br />

Class-III 6 6 - - - -<br />

Class-IV - - - - - -<br />

Promotions<br />

Class-I - - - - - -<br />

Class-II 4 4 1 - 1 -<br />

Class-III <strong>11</strong> <strong>11</strong> 1 - 1 -<br />

Class-IV - - - - - -<br />

161


<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

WEATHER REPORT <strong>2010</strong><br />

Main Institute, Karnal<br />

During the year <strong>2010</strong>, a total rainfall of 1098.3<br />

mm was recorded as against the mean annual<br />

rainfall of 748.9 mm (for the last 39 years).<br />

The year was an excessive rainfall year as the<br />

annual rainfall was 149% of the long-term mean<br />

annual rainfall, whereas the year 2009 was a<br />

deficit rainfall year (65% of the mean annual<br />

rainfall). The maximum monthly rainfall of<br />

358.6 mm was recorded in September. During<br />

the monsoon season, the highest rainstorm of<br />

90.8 mm was recorded on 8 th September. The<br />

winter rainfall (January and February) was 26.6<br />

mm as compared to the last year winter rainfall<br />

(8.3 mm). Winter rainfall was not adequate to<br />

save a single irrigation and hence, increased<br />

the irrigation demand of rabi crops resulting<br />

in higher withdrawal of water from both canal<br />

and groundwater. There were 48 rainy days as<br />

compared to 24 during the last year.<br />

The minimum 2.8 °C and the maximum 45.0<br />

°C temperatures were recorded on 16 th January<br />

and 27 th May, respectively. The lowest relative<br />

humidity was 9% on 7 th April while the highest<br />

(100%) was recorded on several occasions<br />

during the year. The highest soil temperatures at<br />

5 cm, 10 cm and 20 cm soil depths were 47.0°C,<br />

44.4°C and 40.0 °C on a single day (21 May). The<br />

lowest values at the same depths were recorded<br />

as 7.5°C, 9.5°C and <strong>11</strong>.7°C on 16 th January, 16 th<br />

January and 15 th January, respectively. The<br />

total open pan evaporation during the year was<br />

1730.6 mm which is 1.58 times higher than the<br />

annual rainfall. The lowest evaporation of 0.4<br />

mm was recorded on 8 th January and the highest<br />

of 15.6 mm on 2 nd June. The average sunshine<br />

hours per day were 6.4. The highest and lowest<br />

vapour pressure values were 28.5 and 3.0 mm<br />

of mercury column on 17 th August and <strong>11</strong> th<br />

December, respectively. The average wind speed<br />

was 4.0 km per hour. The monthly weather<br />

parameters recorded at agro-meteorological<br />

observatory, <strong>CSSRI</strong>, Karnal for the year <strong>2010</strong> are<br />

presented in Table I.<br />

RRS Canning Town<br />

The total rainfall received during the year <strong>2010</strong><br />

was <strong>11</strong>35.6 mm, the maximum (243.6 mm)<br />

rainfall was recorded in the month of June, <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

The rainfall was less than the average rainfall of<br />

1768 mm in this area, which affected the growth/<br />

transplanting of rice in the initial months of<br />

the kharif season. Due to meagre rains after<br />

the monsoon period supplementary irrigation<br />

is essential for cultivation of crops in rabi and<br />

summer seasons. There were 71 rainy days in<br />

the year. The average daily sunshine hours are<br />

very less in monsoon months (kharif season),<br />

which results in poor yield of rice, the major crop<br />

in the area, during the period. The minimum<br />

temperature was recorded in the month of<br />

January. The average mean temperature of 17.6<br />

o<br />

C in January rises very rapidly to 31.3 o C in the<br />

month of April. The sudden rise in temperature<br />

causes pre-mature flowering of thermophytom<br />

crop plants such as wheat, mustard, linseed,<br />

etc. The relative humidity remains quite high<br />

throughout the year, which causes severe<br />

problems of infestation of insects, pests and<br />

diseases. Highest average wind velocity (13.0<br />

km h -1 ) was recorded in the month April. The<br />

mean monthly weather parameters recorded at<br />

RRS Canning Town are presented in Table II.<br />

RRS, Bharuch<br />

Agro-meteorological observations (Table III)<br />

recorded at Navsari Agricultural University,<br />

Cotton <strong>Research</strong> Centre, Bharuch (latitude<br />

22ON, longitude 73.5OE, and altitude 16.50 m)<br />

during the year <strong>2010</strong> revealed that this region<br />

received rainfall of 1428.8 mm spread over 76<br />

days. Season’s highest rainfall of 461.3 mm was<br />

received during the month of July. Maximum<br />

temperature varied from 41.2 (29.7) (Dec) to 41.2<br />

(May) and minimum 13.1 (Dec) to 27.1 (May)<br />

degree Celsius. Pan evaporation varied from 1.4<br />

mm day -1 during September to 9.8 mm day-1<br />

during April. The average bright sunshine<br />

hours varied from 2.7 hours during August to<br />

9.8 hours during April. Mean relative humidity<br />

varied from 53.1 per cent during February to 906<br />

per cent during September. The average wind<br />

velocity varied from 0.5 km h-1 during October<br />

to 10 km h-1 during June. On the whole, though<br />

<strong>2010</strong> had received very good rains, very intense<br />

showers during July and August had hampered<br />

on farm operations.<br />

162


<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

Weather report <strong>2010</strong><br />

Table I : Mean monthly weather parameters for the year <strong>2010</strong> recorded at the Agro-meteorological Observatory,<br />

Latitude: 29° 43' N Altitude : 245 metres above the mean sea level<br />

Longitude: 76° 58' E I Time : 0722/0830 hours IST<br />

Month<br />

Max. Min. Grass<br />

Min.<br />

II Time : 1422 hours IST<br />

Temperature °C Vapour<br />

pressure<br />

(mm of Hg)<br />

Relative<br />

humidity<br />

(%)<br />

Dry bulb Wet bulb I II I II High/<br />

I II I II<br />

date<br />

Maximum °C Minimum °C<br />

Jan. 16.0 6.7 1.8 0.78 14.2 <strong>11</strong>.6 12.5 7.8 9.3 98 72 25.2/30 8.8/13 10.9/29 2.8/16<br />

Low/<br />

date<br />

High/<br />

date<br />

Low/<br />

date<br />

Feb. 22.9 8.8 4.2 10.1 22.7 9.5 17.0 8.7 <strong>11</strong>.1 93 54 28.2/28 18.8/<strong>11</strong> 16.2/08 4.5/01<br />

Mar. 30.8 14.6 9.4 16.5 30.8 15.4 21.4 12.6 13.5 89 41 36.2/28 24.6/09 19.2/30 10.6/09<br />

Apr. 39.5 20.2 15.0 24.8 39.2 18.4 21.5 12.1 8.5 53 16 43.6/18 35.8/07 27.2/19 14.5/01<br />

May 39.4 24.3 20.5 27.9 39.1 21.7 24.0 15.9 13.1 56 26 45.0/27 26.7/08 29.0/15 19.5/21<br />

Jun. 38.2 25.3 22.8 28.6 37.5 23.3 25.2 18.2 16.7 63 36 43.6/02 25.2/09 30.5/03 20.0/08<br />

Jul. 33.1 26.2 23.2 27.9 32.0 26.6 27.8 25.3 25.5 90 72 38.0/01 27.5/07 28.6/10 23.5/01<br />

Aug. 32.0 25.9 23.3 27.3 31.2 26.3 27.8 25.1 25.8 92 76 35.0/<strong>11</strong> 28.0/01 27.4/<strong>11</strong> 24.0/24<br />

Sept. 30.5 23.3 21.527 25.1 30.0 24.2 26.2 22.3 23.2 93 73 34.2/02 23.5/20 26.5/03 19.4/29<br />

Oct. 31.4 18.5 16.4 20.5 31.1 19.5 22.8 16.8 16.0 91 46 33.3/05 28.3/24 21.5/21 12.2/28<br />

Nov. 27.4 12.3 10.5 13.7 26.9 12.9 17.6 10.8 9.7 91 36 30.6/07 22.0/23 15.2/08 7.0/29<br />

Dec. 20.9 6.6 4.0 7.5 20.3 7.2 13.8 7.4 7.9 95 47 24.0/06 12.5/27 12.0/30 3.5/22<br />

Total -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --<br />

Average 30.2 17.7 14.4 19.8 29.6 18.0 21.5 15.3 15.0 84 50 -- --<br />

163


Weather report <strong>2010</strong> <strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

Month <strong>Soil</strong> temperature °C (Depth) Rainfall* Evaporation Sunshine<br />

(hr/day)<br />

5 cm 10 cm 20 cm Monthly<br />

I II I II I II (mm)<br />

No of rainy<br />

days<br />

Heavy/<br />

date<br />

mm/ day mm/<br />

month<br />

Jan. 10.5 16.8 <strong>11</strong>.7 15.5 13.4 14.5 7.6 1 6.5/04 1.2 35.8 2.4 2.6<br />

(Contd.....)<br />

Wind<br />

speed<br />

(km/hr)<br />

Feb. 12.5 23.9 14.2 21.2 16.3 18.3 19.0 2 14.2/09 2.5 71.1 6.9 3.7<br />

Mar. 20.2 33.8 21.5 31.1 23.9 26.2 0.0 0 0.0/00 4.0 124.9 9.0 3.6<br />

Apr. 27.7 41.0 29.1 38.1 30.8 33.1 7.6 1 7.6/29 10.0 300.1 8.9 4.7<br />

May 29.1 41.5 30.5 39.3 32.3 36.1 18.0 1 16.8/07 12.2 379.4 8.4 6.9<br />

Jun. 30.2 40.4 31.6 38.5 33.3 36.2 81.0 4 46.0/25 9.3 278.7 7.8 6.3<br />

Jul. 29.1 34.5 29.8 32.9 30.5 31.6 347.6 14 88.4/05 4.3 121.3 5.3 5.6<br />

Aug. 28.1 33.3 28.9 32.1 29.5 31.0 230.9 10 58.6/22 3.7 106.1 4.9 4.3<br />

Sept. 26.3 31.8 26.9 30.9 27.6 29.6 358.6 13 90.4/08 3.5 94.4 4.9 3.7<br />

Oct. 21.9 30.3 23.1 28.6 24.4 27.1 00.0 00 0.0 /0 3.3 103.3 6.6 2.2<br />

Nov. 16.4 26.5 18.0 24.9 19.4 23.0 00.0 00 0.0 /0 2.3 67.9 6.2 1.9<br />

Dec. 10.3 19.7 <strong>11</strong>.9 18.2 13.6 16.3 28.0 2 16.0/31 1.5 47.6 5.3 2.0<br />

Total -- -- -- -- -- -- 1098.3 48 -- 57.8 1730.6 76.6 --<br />

Average 21.9 31.1 23.1 29.3 24.6 26.9 -- -- -- 04.8 144.2 06.4 4.0<br />

Rainfall < 2 mm is drizzle or trace; RF-Rainfall<br />

164


<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

Weather report <strong>2010</strong><br />

Table II : Mean monthly weather parameters at Canning Town (Latitude 22° 15´ N, Longitude 88°40´,<br />

Altitude 3.0 Meters (A.M.S.L.) during the year –<strong>2010</strong><br />

Vapour<br />

Temperature RH<br />

pressure<br />

(<br />

Month<br />

0 C)<br />

(%)<br />

(mm Hg)<br />

Max Min Mean I II I II<br />

Wind<br />

velocity<br />

(km h -1 )<br />

Total<br />

Rainfall<br />

(mm)<br />

Rainy<br />

days<br />

Jan. 23.8 <strong>11</strong>.3 17.6 89 47 09.7 10.1 03.2 000.0 0 06.7<br />

Feb. 29.2 16.5 22.8 91 51 14.0 15.6 03.0 003.5 1 06.8<br />

March 34.7 23.9 29.3 88 47 21.3 19.1 07.2 000.0 0 07.5<br />

April 36.0 26.7 31.3 84 53 24.7 22.6 13.0 021.4 2 08.3<br />

May 35.3 26.6 31.0 84 56 25.1 23.5 10.1 134.0 7 07.1<br />

June 33.8 26.5 30.1 87 72 26.9 26.4 08.9 243.6 12 04.1<br />

July 32.4 26.5 29.4 89 75 25.6 25.6 08.0 220.1 15 05.1<br />

Aug. 32.2 26.3 29.3 88 77 25.6 25.2 06.7 180.1 13 05.1<br />

Sept. 31.7 25.9 28.8 91 77 25.3 25.5 05.6 183.8 13 04.7<br />

Oct. 31.9 24.7 28.3 91 67 23.4 22.6 03.4 135.2 6 06.5<br />

Nov. 30.3 20.9 25.6 92 58 18.9 18.3 02.1 003.4 1 06.4<br />

Dec. 25.4 13.8 19.6 90 51 <strong>11</strong>.8 12.1 02.3 010.5 1 06.1<br />

Total 376.7 269.6 323.1 1064 731 252.3 246.6 73.5 <strong>11</strong>35.6 71 74.4<br />

Mean 31.4 22.5 26.9 89 61 21.0 20.5 06.1 - - 06.2<br />

*I indicates 06:35 hrs (I.S.T) *II indicates 13:35 hrs (I.S.T); AMSL-Above mean sea level<br />

Bright<br />

sunshine<br />

(h d -1 )<br />

Table III : Monthly average weather parameters recorded at Cotton <strong>Research</strong> Station, Navsari Agricultural<br />

University, Bharuch during <strong>2010</strong><br />

Month<br />

Max.<br />

Temp.<br />

( o C)<br />

Min.<br />

Rainfall<br />

(mm)<br />

Rainy<br />

Days<br />

R.H.<br />

(%)<br />

Vapour<br />

Pressure<br />

(SVP/<br />

hrs.)<br />

Wind<br />

Velocity<br />

(kmph)<br />

Sun<br />

Shine<br />

(hrs.)<br />

January 31.3 14.3 - - 62.2 10.3 6.6 8.8 3.9<br />

February 33.1 16.2 - - 53.1 10.0 5.7 8.8 4.6<br />

March 38.4 21.8 - - 57.5 14.5 6.5 9.7 6.3<br />

April 40.6 24.2 - - 67.9 20.6 6.6 9.8 9.8<br />

May 41.2 27.1 2.2 1 69.7 23.7 9.9 9.4 9.2<br />

June 36.6 26.7 99.0 10 77.8 25.0 10.0 6.3 4.5<br />

July 31.7 25.3 461.3 19 86.7 24.8 8.5 3.6 3.2<br />

August 31.7 25.3 419.7 19 77.6 24.6 3.4 2.7 2.1<br />

September 32.3 24.7 378.7 21 90.0 24.6 1.5 4.2 1.4<br />

October 35.9 23.6 9.0 1 73.0 20.6 0.5 8.1 5.2<br />

November 32.8 21.7 58.9 5 79.5 18.8 5.1 7.2 4.0<br />

December 29.7 13.1 - - 68.0 10.4 3.7 8.7 3.1<br />

Total 1428.8 76<br />

R.H.-Relative humidity<br />

Pan<br />

Epn.<br />

(mm)<br />

165


<strong>CSSRI</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>11</strong><br />

AUTHOR INDEX<br />

Name Page Name Page<br />

Ajore, Ram 42,<strong>11</strong>7<br />

Arora, S. 89,90,91,93<br />

Bal, A.R. 96,102,106,108<br />

Bandhopadhyay, B. K. 59,95,96,101,102,106,107,108<br />

Batra, Lalita 37,46<br />

Bundela, D.S. 23,25,48,51,53<br />

Burman, D. 59,95,96,100,101,102,106,107,108<br />

Chaudhari, S.K. 26,33,37,53,75,77<br />

Chinchmalatpure, A.R. 32,41,89,90,91,93<br />

Dagar, J.C. 37,54,74,75,77<br />

Damodaran, T. 59,83,85,87<br />

Dey, P. 26,32,53,57<br />

Gathala, M. 72<br />

Gautam, R.K. 58,59,63, <strong>11</strong>7<br />

Gupta, S.K. 23,41,46,48,106,109<br />

Jat, H.S. 28,32,37,72,90<br />

Jeet Ram 75<br />

Joshi, P.K. 26,53<br />

Kamra, S.K. 42,44,51,90,93,100<br />

Khajanchi Lal 30,53,74,75<br />

Khandelwal, M.K. 89,90,91,93<br />

Khurana, M.L. 23<br />

Krishna Murthi, S.L. 57,58,60,71<br />

Kulshreshtha, N. 30,61,62,63,64,66,69,70,<strong>11</strong>7<br />

Kumar, V. 72<br />

Kundu, S.S. 37<br />

Ladha, J.K. 72<br />

Madhu Chaudhary 53<br />

Mahanta, K.K. 95,98,100,106<br />

Mandal, A.K. 21<br />

Mandal, S. 59,95,98,101,102,106,107,108<br />

Meena, R.L. 41,48,54,109<br />

Mishra,V.K. 79,81,83,84,85,87<br />

Nayak. A.K. 81<br />

Pandey, C.B. 74,75,77<br />

Pandey, R.S. 37,46<br />

Pargati Maity 42,51<br />

Qadar, A. 46,57,59,70,<strong>11</strong>7<br />

Rao,G. Gururaja 62,89,91,93<br />

Saharawat, Y.P.S. 72<br />

Sarangi, S.K. 59,95,98,101,102,106,107,108<br />

Satyender Kumar 30,42,44,51,100<br />

Sethi, M. 23,25,48,54<br />

Sharma, D.K. 72,79,81,83,84,85,87,91<br />

Sharma, P.C. 37,63,69,71,72<br />

Sharma, S.K. 26,37,58,59,60,61,66,69,83<br />

Singh, Gurbachan 26,28,37,42,93<br />

Singh, R.K. 90,<strong>11</strong>7<br />

Singh, Ranbir 26,28,81<br />

Singh, S.K. 30,36,42,90<br />

Singh, Y.P. 59,62,79,81,83,84,85<br />

Sirohi, N.S. 37<br />

Tripathi, R.S. 37,41,48,<strong>11</strong>7,<strong>11</strong>8<br />

Varshney, P.K. 79<br />

Verma, C.L. 79,85<br />

Yadav, Gajender 74<br />

Yadav, R.K. 25,30,42,44,53,54,74<br />

Yaduvanshi, N.P.S. 33,37,48,66,72<br />

Maji, B. 95, 98,102<br />

166

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!