90 VIOLETA GAJIĆ, VESNA MATOVIĆ, NEBOJŠA VASIĆ & DANICA SREĆKOVIĆ-BATOĆANIN The Turonian–Senonian age of the Struganik limestone is documented by the microfossils: Praeglobotruncana helvetica, Rotalipora sp., Globotruncana lapparenti coronata, etc. (FILIPOVIĆ et al. 1978). A recent micropaleontological analysis, i.e., the association of pelagic globotruncanas, indicates that these sediments are of Campanian age (GAJIĆ 2007). The age of radiolarians from the layer of smectite clay within the micrite limestone of the Struganik was defined as the Coniacian (VASIĆ et al. 2005; DJERIĆ et al. 2009). Material and methods Determination of petrological properties of the Struganik limestone commenced with field observations in the quarry and preparation of a detailed lithological column. A total of 33 samples were collected from the lowest level of the quarry for further laboratory testing in order to assess the structural and chemical composition of the limestone (Fig. 2). A microscopic analysis of thin sections by optical microscopy was used to characterize the mineral composition, microtextural features (size and kind of allochem, grain orientation, etc.), and content and type of microfossils. Based on the field inspection and the results of a petrographic (optical) investigation, the rock samples were classified according to the FOLK (1959) and DUNHAM (1962) classification scheme. In the same samples, the contents of CaO and MgO were determined by the complexometric method (EDTA titration) using a standardized solution of 1 M EDTA as the titrant. In order to examine the quality of the Struganik limestone as a building stone, the physical (bulk and apparent density, porosity, water absorption, frost resistance) and mechanical properties (compressive strength, abrasive resistance) of a total of 18 samples from the quarry were determined. The laboratory tests were performed according to the national standards (Unification of Serbian Standards) at the Laboratory of the Highway Institute of in Belgrade. The bulk density is given as mass per unit of apparent volume. The volume was determined by hydrostatic weighing of the specimens soaked and suspended in water under atmospheric pressure (according to SRPS B.B8.032). On powdery samples, the real densities were determined using a pycnometer with water as the displacement fluid. From the values for real and bulk density, the total porosity was calculated (according to SRPS B.B8.032). The specimens that were used for the determination of the bulk density were also used for the determination of the water absorption, which was determined by measurement of the mass of water absorbed by the sample after immersion for 48 h at atmospheric pressure. It is expressed as a percentage of the initial mass of the sample previously dried at 105 °C to constant weight (SRPS B.B8.010). The resistance to frost was determined by 25 cycles of freezing to –25 °C and thawing according to SRPS B.B8.001. The freeze–thaw tests were performed on cubic samples to assess the durability of the limestone samples by determining their strength and mass loss after 25 freeze–thaw cycles. The test procedure involved repeating of cycles where one cycle involved placing a water-saturated sample in a freezing chamber for 4 h, after which the sample was totally immersed in water in a thawing tank for 2 h. The limestone samples were tested for their mechanical properties (compressive strength and abrasion resistance). The uniaxial compressive strength tests (SRPS B.B8.012) were performed on both dry and water-saturated limestone samples (5×5×5 cm cube) and on samples that had been subjected to the freeze–thaw test. According to SRPS B.B8.015, cubic samples of 7 cm in size were used for determination of the Böhme abrasion resistance. The test procedure involved 440 cycles of sample abrasion using abrasion dust (crystalline corundum) on a rotating steel disc under an applied stress of 300 N. In order to evaluate the relationships between the physical and mechanical properties, different statistical analysis techniques (basic descriptive statistics, correlation, bivariant regression analysis, etc.) were performed using the SPSS computer program. All the measured values of the technical properties were statistical analyzed at the level of significance (α) of 0.05. The descriptive statistical parameters included the mean, minimum and maximum value, standard deviation, median, standard error, range, quartiles, standardized skewness, kurtosis, etc. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov (non-parametric test for normality) was used with the level of significance set at 0.2. Subsequently, the results of the laboratory measurements were correlated using the method of least squares regression. Linear regression (y = ax+b) were performed and the equations of the best-fit line, the regression coefficient (R 2 ) and the 95 % confidence limit were determined for the regressions. Validation of the regression analyses was confirmed by the Student t-test and by the test of variant analysis (the F-test). Petrological properties of the Struganik limestones Struganik limestones are the latest Upper Cretaceous sediments in this part of western Serbia. The limestones are best uncovered in the village Struganik. Exploration were performed in the “Struganik” quarry and a lithological column about 10 m tall was constructed (Fig. 4). The limestones are massive and compact. Their uniform grayish color throughout the entire deposit is
Petrophysical and mechanical properties of the Struganik limestone (Vardar Zone, western Serbia) 91 Fig. 4. Local lithological column of the lowest level in the “Struganik”quarry.
- Page 1 and 2:
HFPMP\LJ![BWPE!VOJWFS[JUFUB!V!CFPHS
- Page 3 and 4:
GEOLO[KI ANALI BALKANSKOGA POLUOSTR
- Page 5 and 6:
Trans-border (north-east Serbia/nor
- Page 7 and 8:
Trans-border (north-east Serbia/nor
- Page 9 and 10:
Trans-border (north-east Serbia/nor
- Page 11 and 12:
Trans-border (north-east Serbia/nor
- Page 13 and 14:
Trans-border (north-east Serbia/nor
- Page 15 and 16:
Trans-border (north-east Serbia/nor
- Page 17 and 18:
Trans-border (north-east Serbia/nor
- Page 19 and 20:
Trans-border (north-east Serbia/nor
- Page 21 and 22:
Trans-border (north-east Serbia/nor
- Page 23 and 24:
GEOLO[KI ANALI BALKANSKOGA POLUOSTR
- Page 25 and 26:
Trans-border (east Serbia/west Bulg
- Page 27 and 28:
Trans-border (east Serbia/west Bulg
- Page 29 and 30:
Trans-border (east Serbia/west Bulg
- Page 31 and 32:
GEOLO[KI ANALI BALKANSKOGA POLUOSTR
- Page 33 and 34:
Late Cretaceous marine biodiversity
- Page 35 and 36:
Late Cretaceous marine biodiversity
- Page 37 and 38:
Late Cretaceous marine biodiversity
- Page 39 and 40:
Late Cretaceous marine biodiversity
- Page 41 and 42: Late Cretaceous marine biodiversity
- Page 43 and 44: Late Cretaceous marine biodiversity
- Page 45 and 46: Late Cretaceous marine biodiversity
- Page 47 and 48: Late Cretaceous marine biodiversity
- Page 49 and 50: GEOLO[KI ANALI BALKANSKOGA POLUOSTR
- Page 51 and 52: Involutina farinacciae BRONNIMANN &
- Page 53 and 54: Involutina farinacciae BRONNIMANN &
- Page 55 and 56: Involutina farinacciae BRONNIMANN &
- Page 57 and 58: Involutina farinacciae BRONNIMANN &
- Page 59 and 60: Involutina farinacciae BRONNIMANN &
- Page 61 and 62: Involutina farinacciae BRONNIMANN &
- Page 63 and 64: Involutina farinacciae BRONNIMANN &
- Page 65 and 66: GEOLO[KI ANALI BALKANSKOGA POLUOSTR
- Page 67 and 68: Paraseqences in the Kotroman Format
- Page 69 and 70: Paraseqences in the Kotroman Format
- Page 71 and 72: Paraseqences in the Kotroman Format
- Page 73 and 74: GEOLO[KI ANALI BALKANSKOGA POLUOSTR
- Page 75 and 76: New data concerning the Early Middl
- Page 77 and 78: New data concerning the Early Middl
- Page 79 and 80: New data concerning the Early Middl
- Page 81 and 82: New data concerning the Early Middl
- Page 83 and 84: New data concerning the Early Middl
- Page 85 and 86: New data concerning the Early Middl
- Page 87: New data concerning the Early Middl
- Page 90 and 91: 88 VIOLETA GAJIĆ, VESNA MATOVIĆ,
- Page 94 and 95: 92 VIOLETA GAJIĆ, VESNA MATOVIĆ,
- Page 96 and 97: 94 VIOLETA GAJIĆ, VESNA MATOVIĆ,
- Page 98 and 99: 96 VIOLETA GAJIĆ, VESNA MATOVIĆ,
- Page 100 and 101: 98 VIOLETA GAJIĆ, VESNA MATOVIĆ,
- Page 102 and 103: 100 VIOLETA GAJIĆ, VESNA MATOVIĆ,
- Page 104 and 105: 102 IVAN ANTONIJEVIĆ An olistostro
- Page 106 and 107: 104 IVAN ANTONIJEVIĆ Larger ore-cl
- Page 108 and 109: 106 IVAN ANTONIJEVIĆ Ore-clasts of
- Page 110 and 111: 108 IVAN ANTONIJEVIĆ than 140 m wi
- Page 112 and 113: 118 MILOJE ILIĆ, ZORAN PAVLOVIĆ &
- Page 114 and 115: 112 MILOJE ILIĆ, ZORAN PAVLOVIĆ &
- Page 116 and 117: 114 MILOJE ILIĆ, ZORAN PAVLOVIĆ &
- Page 118 and 119: 116 MILOJE ILIĆ, ZORAN PAVLOVIĆ &
- Page 120 and 121: 118 MILOJE ILIĆ, ZORAN PAVLOVIĆ &
- Page 122 and 123: 120 RADE JELENKOVIĆ & BLAŽO BOEV
- Page 124 and 125: 122 RADE JELENKOVIĆ & BLAŽO BOEV
- Page 126 and 127: 124 RADE JELENKOVIĆ & BLAŽO BOEV
- Page 128 and 129: 126 RADE JELENKOVIĆ & BLAŽO BOEV
- Page 130 and 131: 128 RADE JELENKOVIĆ & BLAŽO BOEV
- Page 132 and 133: 130 RADE JELENKOVIĆ & BLAŽO BOEV
- Page 134 and 135: 132 ZORAN STEVANOVIĆ et al. топ
- Page 136 and 137: 134 ZORAN STEVANOVIĆ et al. Fig. 2
- Page 138 and 139: 136 ZORAN STEVANOVIĆ et al. for th
- Page 140 and 141: 138 ZORAN STEVANOVIĆ et al. Fig. 5
- Page 142 and 143:
140 ZORAN STEVANOVIĆ et al. MILIVO
- Page 145 and 146:
GEOLO[KI ANALI BALKANSKOGA POLUOSTR
- Page 147 and 148:
Hydrogeological and hydrodynamic ch
- Page 149 and 150:
Hydrogeological and hydrodynamic ch
- Page 151 and 152:
Hydrogeological and hydrodynamic ch
- Page 153 and 154:
Hydrogeological and hydrodynamic ch
- Page 155 and 156:
Hydrogeological and hydrodynamic ch
- Page 157 and 158:
Hydrogeological and hydrodynamic ch
- Page 159:
Hydrogeological and hydrodynamic ch
- Page 162 and 163:
118 MILOJE ILIĆ, ZORAN PAVLOVIĆ &
- Page 164:
Vol. 72 December, 2011 Contents PLA