GSC Sentinel-2 PDGS OCD - Emits - ESA
GSC Sentinel-2 PDGS OCD - Emits - ESA
GSC Sentinel-2 PDGS OCD - Emits - ESA
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>ESA</strong> UNCLASSIFIED – For Official Use<br />
<strong>GSC</strong> <strong>Sentinel</strong>-2 <strong>PDGS</strong> <strong>OCD</strong><br />
Issue 1 Revision 2 (draft) - 25.07.2010<br />
GMES-GSEG-EOPG-TN-09-0008<br />
page 126 of 350<br />
For this, the capabilities offered by the satellite design outlined in 3.5.4 and further<br />
detailed in [AD-03] and [RD-41] regarding NRT prioritisation or RT downlink will be<br />
used as described in section 4.5.4.2.2; .<br />
It is assumed for this final stage that the timeliness partitioning will be compatible with<br />
the respective capabilities and grants allocated accordingly at the previous<br />
configuration steps.<br />
○ A scene security constraint [TBC] to ensure that the last MSI scene downlinked is<br />
effectively entirely transmitted before LOS (~3.5 seconds TX duration per scene).<br />
○ The requirements provided through the HLOP for the parallel accommodation of LGS<br />
direct-downlinks introduced in section 4.2.7 according to the operation scenario<br />
detailed in 4.5.4.3.<br />
○ The accommodation of ancillary-data downlinks at the term of each downlink at every<br />
CGS or LGS as further explained separately in section 4.5.4.2.3.<br />
○ The accommodation of HKTM data downlinks at selected CGSs according to the<br />
operation scenario detailed separately in section 4.5.5.<br />
The mission plan elaborated by the <strong>PDGS</strong> will comprehensively optimise the detailed<br />
downlink scenario based on the above considerations.<br />
Considering the maximum size of the on-board MSI store of 2360 Gbits corresponding to<br />
about 5 times the storage requirement of an average orbit, this limit will not jeopardize the<br />
nominal scenario even considering acquisitions campaigns complementing the nominal<br />
acquisition plan (cf. 4.5.4.1.1). In case of a degraded contingency downlink scenario required<br />
to operate with less than 4 stations, the data acquisition plan will be reduced accordingly to fit<br />
within the 2360Gbits packet store autonomy. A safety check in this respect will be<br />
implemented to invalidate plans neglecting this constraint.<br />
4.5.4.2.1.4 CGS Scheduling<br />
As driven by the detailed mission plan settled with the FOS, the CGS schedule will be<br />
generated to trigger the on-ground data reception activities (cf. section 4.5.4.2.4). This<br />
scheduling will be performed periodically and will include:<br />
o A reception schedule to enable the satellite acquisition from the station antenna;<br />
o A front-end processing schedule to enable front-end processing activities.<br />
This decoupled scheduling between data reception and front-end processing activities will<br />
be used to selectively manage the acquisitions between overlapping ground station contacts<br />
Whilst the reception schedule will ensure satellite tracking from satellite entry into the station<br />
visibility mask, the front-end processing schedule will selectively map to the data playback<br />
activities assigned to the station in the downlink plan.<br />
4.5.4.2.2 MSI Packet-Store Management<br />
Following the logic described in the previous paragraph, the detailed downlink planning of<br />
MSI data will require the accurate management of the on-board MSI packet-store to gradually<br />
playback the data acquired and buffered on-board according to the timeliness requirements<br />
set for each image segment.<br />
© <strong>ESA</strong><br />
The copyright of this document is the property of <strong>ESA</strong>. It is supplied in confidence and shall not be reproduced, copied or<br />
communicated to any third party without written permission from <strong>ESA</strong>.