GSC Sentinel-2 PDGS OCD - Emits - ESA

More documents

Recommendations

Info

GSC Sentinel-2 PDGS OCD Issue 1 Revision 2 (draft) - 25.07.2010 GMES-GSEG-EOPG-TN-09-0008 page 202 of 350 5.2.2.2 System Control Functions 5.2.2.2.1 Core Objective As primary goal, the System Control functions aim at providing the necessary means to control, monitor, assess, and fine tune the PDGS towards its goals and to mature its evolutions. 5.2.2.2.2 Design Drivers The main drivers shared by system-control functions are mostly driven by the Mission- Support services characteristics including the baseline requirements for system evolutions defined in section 4.6 and extensions through third-party collaborations as described in 4.10.2. Associated drivers are highlighted such as: ○ The reliability of service for the accurate management of the overall system configuration according to the HLOP and its derived plans and throughout mission phase changes; ○ The operational reliability, availability, maintainability of all PDGS services versus their stakeholders such as the FOS and downstream data consumers, including during specific phase-in activities of new spacecraft units or EDRS. ○ The well-controlled performance of the PDGS, the FOS and the space-segment vis-àvis the availability, timeliness and quality of all products delivered and of the mission as a whole; ○ The operational assessment and monitoring of the PDGS sub-systems functioning and performance in operations following well-defined procedures for anomaly management, preventive maintenance and corrective maintenance; ○ The long-term outlook of the PDGS services within the GSC in terms of flexibility and evolution capability it will be required to cover; ○ The long-term sustainability of PDGS operations. On a functional design point of view, the following drivers and constraints are highlighted: ○ To support the POM in its responsibilities (cf. section 4.2.1) the PDGS design shall feature a well-defined mission-control-loop directly responding to the services described in section 4.10.3 in providing the appropriate leverages on the main PDGS configurable elements systematically complemented by feedback visibility and measures on the associated performance. ○ Taking advantage of the systematic and near-deterministic nature of the Sentinel-2 data-acquisition plan, the mission planning and mission performance assessment and control activities aims for a near-autonomous and automated behaviour to the maximum feasible extent; ○ The required long-term operational sustainability of the PDGS operations imposes a high-level of maturity to all system-management activities following well-defined procedures supported by widely used system management tools embedding computer-based automation when relevant; ESA UNCLASSIFIED – For Official Use © ESA The copyright of this document is the property of ESA. It is supplied in confidence and shall not be reproduced, copied or communicated to any third party without written permission from ESA.
GSC Sentinel-2 PDGS OCD Issue 1 Revision 2 (draft) - 25.07.2010 GMES-GSEG-EOPG-TN-09-0008 page 203 of 350 ○ The Sentinel-2 spacecrafts and in particular the MSI instrument featuring leading-edge technology coupled with the stiff requirements imposed on the accuracy of the final products impose that a certain number of critical tasks are assumed interactively by experts teams rather than fully automated in particular in the MSI performance and product quality control areas; ○ The gradual phase-in of spacecrafts in the constellation as well as EDRS during operations imposes strict configuration control mechanisms for the accurate management of the software, hardware and of the overall PDGS configuration especially during the transitory phases separating operational scenarios. It also imposes that the PDGS functions are designed with multi-spacecraft embedded features since the beginning allowing to clearly discriminating the PDGS configuration applicable to each spacecraft on a logical point of view; ○ Lessons learnt coupled with the long-term outlook of the Sentinel-2 mission imposes that the planning capabilities be flexible and include room for evolutions with respect to the strict baseline defined at present; ○ The non a-priori knowledge of the EDRS OCP exploitation methods and constraints at the time of design imposes additional flexibility in the mission planning element to allow for a swift and optimal assimilation of EDRS capabilities when they will be better defined and/or measured; ○ The cross dependencies between the LGS downlink opportunities and the nominal data recovery plan to the CGS network impose that the mission planning capabilities allow for optimising the direct-downlink opportunities to LGS throughout the mission plan within the constraints settled for the nominal mission; ○ The fostering and effective implementation of collaborative PDGS opportunities will impose that specific technical support is provided towards the peer entities with mission management feedback to guarantee the appropriate definitions and successes of the collaborations. 5.2.2.2.3 Breakdown Derived from the above considerations, the functional breakdown regarding system-control functions is depicted on Figure 5-2. ESA UNCLASSIFIED – For Official Use © ESA The copyright of this document is the property of ESA. It is supplied in confidence and shall not be reproduced, copied or communicated to any third party without written permission from ESA.
Page 1 and 2:
document title/ titre du document P
Page 3 and 4:
GSC Sentinel-2 PDGS OCD issue 1 rev
Page 5 and 6:
Page 7 and 8:
Page 9 and 10:
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
GSC Sentinel-2 PDGS OCD Issue 1 Rev
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
[RD-33] Sentinel-2 MSI - Level 2A A
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
LES LGS Land Equipped Sites Local G
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
3.5.2 MULTI-SPECTRAL INSTRUMENT CHA
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
ESA UNCLASSIFIED - For Official Use
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Table 4-5 Radiometric image quality
Page 99 and 100:
Product- Type On-Line retention Off
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
4.5.1.5 Scalability and Flexibility
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148: ESA UNCLASSIFIED - For Official Use
Page 149 and 150: GSC Sentinel-2 PDGS OCD Issue 1 Rev
Page 159 and 160: 4.6.3 OPERATIONAL TRANSFER BASELINE
Page 177 and 178: Product- Type Identifier S2MSI0 S2M
Page 191 and 192: 5 PDGS DESIGN GSC Sentinel-2 PDGS O
Page 197: ESA UNCLASSIFIED - For Official Use
Page 207 and 208: ○ Effective processing resources
Page 231 and 232: o preserving integrity of exchanged
Page 243 and 244: 6 DETAILED OPERATIONS CONCEPTS GSC
Page 245 and 246: o Report generation frequency and c
Page 249 and 250:
Page 251 and 252:
○ MSI L1A, L1B, L1C and TCI produ
Page 253 and 254:
Page 255 and 256:
Page 257 and 258:
Page 259 and 260:
Page 261 and 262:
Page 263 and 264:
Page 265 and 266:
Page 267 and 268:
Page 269 and 270:
Page 271 and 272:
Page 273 and 274:
Page 275 and 276:
Page 277 and 278:
Page 279 and 280:
Page 281 and 282:
Page 283 and 284:
Page 285 and 286:
Page 287 and 288:
Page 289 and 290:
Some relevant use cases are present
Page 291 and 292:
Page 293 and 294:
Page 295 and 296:
Page 297 and 298:
Page 299 and 300:
Page 301 and 302:
Page 303 and 304:
Page 305 and 306:
Page 307 and 308:
Page 309 and 310:
Page 311 and 312:
Page 313 and 314:
Page 315 and 316:
Page 317 and 318:
Page 319 and 320:
Page 321 and 322:
Page 323 and 324:
Page 325 and 326:
Two main mapping services have been
Page 327 and 328:
The requirement on the cloud covera
Page 329 and 330:
Page 331 and 332:
Page 333 and 334:
Page 335 and 336:
Page 337 and 338:
Page 339 and 340:
Page 341 and 342:
Page 343 and 344:
Page 345 and 346:
show all

GSC Sentinel-2 PDGS OCD - Emits - ESA

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?