29.11.2014 Views

GSC Sentinel-2 PDGS OCD - Emits - ESA

GSC Sentinel-2 PDGS OCD - Emits - ESA

GSC Sentinel-2 PDGS OCD - Emits - ESA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>GSC</strong> <strong>Sentinel</strong>-2 <strong>PDGS</strong> <strong>OCD</strong><br />

Issue 1 Revision 2 (draft) - 25.07.2010<br />

GMES-GSEG-EOPG-TN-09-0008<br />

page 225 of 350<br />

o Automatically notification on the required downlink passes (pass-list) according to the<br />

generated Mission-Plan, for their booking at the ground stations (CGS/LGS);<br />

o Generating automatically the CGS/LGS X-Band & Ka-Band Acquisition-Schedule-Plan<br />

according to scheduled activities;<br />

o Generating automatically the EDRS-Booking-Plan according to scheduled activities<br />

and static EDRS Availability Segments assigned to <strong>Sentinel</strong>-2;<br />

o Automating explained above planning generation activities to avoid operator<br />

intervention when possible;<br />

o Supporting the <strong>PDGS</strong>-FOS mission planning loop. Accordingly verifying the complete<br />

scheduling by the FOS of the Mission-Plan activities;<br />

o Providing planning analysis & assessment capabilities (statistics generation on<br />

generated planning such as highest, average, lowest data latency figures, total sensing<br />

time, etc.);<br />

5.2.4.2.2 Design Drivers and Constraints<br />

The following drivers and constraints are identified:<br />

○<br />

Flexibility to adapt to different acquisition & downlink scenarios (e.g. different ground<br />

stations assignation along mission life, ground stations roles, etc.).<br />

○ Multi-spacecraft management capabilities (i.e. load balancing strategies between S2A<br />

and S2B spacecrafts for acquisitions, downlinks, etc.).<br />

○ Automation capabilities for the planning generation activities;<br />

○ Usage of “<strong>Sentinel</strong>s” Mission CFI generated by ESTEC (envisaged customisation of<br />

the Earth Explorer CFI);<br />

○ Operational interface for inputs/outputs through the MCC function acting as proxy;<br />

○ Usage of the DC function for required data circulation activities;<br />

5.2.4.2.3 Function Interfaces<br />

The following function interfaces are identified for the MPL function:<br />

○ The POM for the definition of the mission acquisition and downlink scenario cascading<br />

from the HLOP;<br />

○ The MPA function operators for specific calibration requests;<br />

○ Input interface for relevant mission reference configuration (e.g. ground stations<br />

database, SSCF, etc.) provided by MCC function via DC function;<br />

○ Input interface for the FOS planning response (i.e. Plan Increment File) provided<br />

through the MCC and DC functions;<br />

○ Input interface for mission reference operations information (e.g. FOS PIF, predicted<br />

orbit file, etc.) provided by the MCC function;<br />

○ Output interface for mission reference files delivery (e.g. reference orbit file);<br />

<strong>ESA</strong> UNCLASSIFIED – For Official Use<br />

© <strong>ESA</strong><br />

The copyright of this document is the property of <strong>ESA</strong>. It is supplied in confidence and shall not be reproduced, copied or<br />

communicated to any third party without written permission from <strong>ESA</strong>.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!