30.11.2014 Views

Das Zentrum für Literatur- und Kulturforschung Berlin (ZfL) vergibt ...

Das Zentrum für Literatur- und Kulturforschung Berlin (ZfL) vergibt ...

Das Zentrum für Literatur- und Kulturforschung Berlin (ZfL) vergibt ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Gerda Henkel Fo<strong>und</strong>ation, Special Programme Security, Society, and the State<br />

Topic Focus 5: “Security Strategies between Doctrine Formation and Implementation”<br />

Security and the Future:<br />

A Cultural Studies Approach<br />

Applicants: PD Dr. Stefan Willer (Center for Literary and Cultural Research <strong>Berlin</strong>), PD Dr.<br />

Benjamin Bühler (Center for Literary and Cultural Research <strong>Berlin</strong> /University of Constance)<br />

1. Problem Statement and Research Interest<br />

Problem Statement<br />

The planned project investigates, from a cultural studies perspective, the connection between<br />

security and futurity. It analyzes the epistemic and cultural presuppositions of ‘security’ by<br />

focusing on I.) military scenarios since 1945, II.) debates on political ecology and risk prevention<br />

since 1970 and III.) representations of security and prevention in contemporary literature<br />

and film. By drawing on these cultural phenomena that have a broad impact on contemporary<br />

Western societies, the project aims to broaden both scientific research and public debate on<br />

security issues.<br />

Concepts as well as practices of security grow from their specific linkages to the future. Just<br />

like the term ‘security’ connotes strategy and planning, the very notion of security is prospective<br />

– prospective in a two-fold manner: For one, ‘security’ denotes our present-day management<br />

to reduce the potential of risk in the future, or to at least prolong the current, assessable<br />

situation into the future. At the same time, the term implies we possess assured knowledge of<br />

the future: It thus assumes a kind of presupposed certainty about the future. However, when it<br />

comes to debates of security within political, economical and technical domains, this presupposition<br />

of a certified knowledge about the future remains largely unheeded, as do its<br />

constitutive, legitimizing and organizing qualities. The role of climate research for the present<br />

debate on climate change can be <strong>und</strong>erstood as an example for this blind spot within current<br />

discussions of security issues: Politicians expect concrete statements from climate researchers<br />

concerning future changes of climate and suggestions as to what kind of preventive measures<br />

may be taken. Climate researchers, however, cannot meet these expectations, since they are<br />

only able to deliver prognoses of probability. The social significance of these prognoses lies<br />

precisely in the production and communication of uncertainty (Hulme 2009).<br />

Due to these often unrecognized, varying forms of assumptions about the future and the conflicts<br />

resulting from them, our project aims to investigate, from a cultural studies perspective,<br />

the connection between security and futurity. We will systematically examine the ambivalence<br />

tied to the concept of ‘security’: being secure and being sure. The project’s epistemological<br />

research trajectory thus aims at the issues and questions raised in topic focus 5, “Secu-<br />

2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!