01.12.2014 Views

Beyond the Wheel - Survey Technical Report - Canadian Trucking ...

Beyond the Wheel - Survey Technical Report - Canadian Trucking ...

Beyond the Wheel - Survey Technical Report - Canadian Trucking ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Transform your PDFs into Flipbooks and boost your revenue!

Leverage SEO-optimized Flipbooks, powerful backlinks, and multimedia content to professionally showcase your products and significantly increase your reach.

BEYOND THE WHEEL<br />

<strong>Survey</strong> <strong>Technical</strong> <strong>Report</strong> - 2012<br />

Labour Market Information Study<br />

Our mission: to assist <strong>the</strong> <strong>Canadian</strong> trucking industry to<br />

recruit, train and retain <strong>the</strong> human resources needed<br />

to meet current and long-term requirements.<br />

This project is funded by <strong>the</strong> Government<br />

of Canada’s Sector Council Program.


Acknowledgements<br />

The <strong>Canadian</strong> <strong>Trucking</strong> Human Resources Council (CTHRC) wishes to express sincere appreciation for <strong>the</strong> contribution of representatives<br />

from <strong>the</strong> carriers and fleets, professional associations, labour organizations, and independent professionals who contributed directly or<br />

indirectly to this publication. The commitment to excellence of <strong>the</strong> many participants has made this report possible. Special acknowledgement<br />

is extended to <strong>the</strong> Labour Market Information – 4 Project Advisory Committee who oversaw <strong>the</strong> project and CTHRC’s Provincial Labour<br />

Market Information Networks who provided <strong>the</strong>ir technical expertise on this project.<br />

Contact Information<br />

<strong>Canadian</strong> <strong>Trucking</strong> Human Resources Council<br />

203–720 Belfast Road<br />

Ottawa, ON K1G 0Z5<br />

Tel.: 613-244-4800 Fax: 613-244-4535<br />

E-mail: info@cthrc.com<br />

Internet: www.cthrc.com<br />

Copyright © 2012 <strong>Canadian</strong> <strong>Trucking</strong> Human Resources Council (CTHRC)<br />

All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any<br />

means, including electronic, photocopying, recording or o<strong>the</strong>rwise, without prior written permission from <strong>the</strong> <strong>Canadian</strong> <strong>Trucking</strong> Human<br />

Resources Council.<br />

Alternative Formats<br />

This publication is available in electronic format on <strong>the</strong> <strong>Canadian</strong> <strong>Trucking</strong> Human Resources Council website at www.cthrc.com.<br />

Disclaimer<br />

The material in this report reflects <strong>the</strong> CTHRC’s best judgment in light of <strong>the</strong> information available to it at <strong>the</strong> time of preparation. Any use<br />

that a third party makes of this report, or any reliance on or decisions to be made based on it, are <strong>the</strong> responsibility of such third parties.<br />

The CTHRC accepts no responsibility for damages, if any, suffered by any third party as a result of decisions made or actions based on this<br />

report. Information has been obtained by <strong>the</strong> CTHRC from sources believed to be reliable. However, because of <strong>the</strong> possibility of human<br />

or mechanical error by our sources, <strong>the</strong> CTHRC does not guarantee <strong>the</strong> accuracy, adequacy or completeness of any of <strong>the</strong> information.<br />

The author, publisher and contributors shall not be held liable in any degree for any loss or injury by an omission, error, misprint or ambiguity.<br />

If you have any questions regarding <strong>the</strong> content of this publication, <strong>the</strong> CTHRC staff is available to provide information and assistance.<br />

Printed in Canada.


Table of Contents<br />

1. Introduction. ..................................................................................................................................................... 1<br />

2. <strong>Survey</strong> Methodology. .................................................................................................................................. 2<br />

2.1. Development of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Survey</strong> Instrument. ..................................................................................................... 2<br />

2.2 Sample Development ................................................................................................................................... 2<br />

2.2.1 <strong>Survey</strong> Administration ......................................................................................................................... 3<br />

2.3 <strong>Survey</strong> Representation and Coverage of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Trucking</strong> Sector .................................................................. 4<br />

3. <strong>Trucking</strong> Company Characteristics. ................................................................................................... 6<br />

3.1 Type of Operator ............................................................................................................................................ 6<br />

3.2 Primary Sector of Operation . ........................................................................................................................ 7<br />

3.3 Distribution of Fleets ..................................................................................................................................... 8<br />

3.4 Fleet Size . ......................................................................................................................................................10<br />

3.5 Hauling Type . ................................................................................................................................................11<br />

4. Workforce Profile. .......................................................................................................................................14<br />

4.1 Total Employees ..........................................................................................................................................14<br />

4.2 Employment in Key Occupations ..............................................................................................................16<br />

4.3 Employee Demographics ..........................................................................................................................17<br />

5. Industry Demand. ........................................................................................................................................20<br />

5.1 Current Vacancies .......................................................................................................................................20<br />

5.2 Retention .....................................................................................................................................................21<br />

5.3 Future Workforce ........................................................................................................................................21<br />

5.4 Recruitment ..................................................................................................................................................22<br />

APPENDIX A: . ..........................................................................................................................................................23<br />

Allied & Associated Trades <strong>Survey</strong> <strong>Technical</strong> <strong>Report</strong>. .........................................................................................23


1. Introduction<br />

The <strong>Canadian</strong> <strong>Trucking</strong> Human Resources Council (CTHRC) has been in operation since January 1994. It is a<br />

national organization governed by a Board of Directors that represents a variety of interests within <strong>the</strong> trucking industry. 1<br />

The CTHRC was formed during a period of deregulation in <strong>the</strong> trucking industry and is committed to assisting <strong>the</strong> <strong>Canadian</strong><br />

trucking industry with <strong>the</strong>ir human resource needs and responding with research, training and advice.<br />

The goal of this national survey is to augment <strong>the</strong> data in <strong>the</strong> CTHRC’s Labour Information Highway - Demand Data Tool by<br />

filling in <strong>the</strong> data gaps. A survey of employers was completed with companies in <strong>the</strong> trucking sector and companies that<br />

hire employees in Allied and Associated trades. The data collected through <strong>the</strong> survey will be used to:<br />

••<br />

provide sub-sector data (i.e., owner-operators, private, for-hire, large carriers, small carriers and metros (trucking hubs));<br />

••<br />

provide information about labour force characteristics;<br />

••<br />

update national, provincial and sub-sector ratios in <strong>the</strong> LMI Demand Forecasting Model, and<br />

••<br />

develop an HR Benchmarking Tool for carriers enabling <strong>the</strong>m to enter <strong>the</strong>ir own company HR statistics and develop<br />

forecasts using <strong>the</strong> variables and relationships developed in <strong>the</strong> LMI Demand Forecasting Model.<br />

The results of <strong>the</strong> survey of trucking companies are presented in this report, with <strong>the</strong> results of Allied and Associated Trades<br />

survey contained in Appendix A. The remainder of this report is organized as follows:<br />

Section 2: <strong>Survey</strong> Methodology<br />

Section 3: <strong>Trucking</strong> Company Characteristics<br />

Section 4: Workforce Profile<br />

Section 5: Industry Demand<br />

1 http://www.cthrc.com/en/content/board-directors<br />

<strong>Beyond</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Wheel</strong><br />

1


2. <strong>Survey</strong> Methodology<br />

Several activities were completed for <strong>the</strong> survey component of <strong>the</strong> project. Each activity is described in <strong>the</strong> remainder of<br />

this section.<br />

2.1 Development of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Survey</strong> Instrument<br />

The CTHRC <strong>Survey</strong> of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Trucking</strong> Sector was designed to collect information about <strong>the</strong> characteristics of <strong>the</strong> trucking sector<br />

and its workforce. As part of <strong>the</strong> survey design, information on <strong>the</strong> nine key occupations in <strong>the</strong> trucking industry (separating<br />

Truck Drivers by class and type) were included. These occupations included:<br />

••<br />

Company Truck Driver (Class 1/AZ);<br />

••<br />

Company Truck Driver (Class 3/D);<br />

••<br />

Owner/Operator Truck Driver (Class 1/AZ or 3/D);<br />

••<br />

Truck/Transport Mechanic (heavy duty);<br />

••<br />

Transport Trailer Technician (heavy duty);<br />

••<br />

Parts Technician (Parts Person);<br />

••<br />

Shunt Drivers (Class 1/AZ or 3D);<br />

••<br />

Cargo Worker;<br />

••<br />

Dispatcher;<br />

••<br />

Freight Claims/Safety & Loss Prevention Specialist, and<br />

••<br />

Foreman/Supervisor/Manager.<br />

The survey consisted of four sections:<br />

••<br />

Your Organization (i.e., location, number of branches, number of power units 2 , type of operator, sector of operation,<br />

and type of hauling);<br />

••<br />

Your Workforce (i.e., number of employees in each occupation and use of human resource personnel);<br />

••<br />

Retention of Workforce (i.e., staff turnover, difficulty filling occupations, and age profile of current employees), and<br />

••<br />

Future Workforce (i.e., expected growth).<br />

To ensure <strong>the</strong> questionnaire was appropriate for employers in <strong>the</strong> trucking sector and Allied and Associated trades, it was<br />

reviewed and pilot tested through a validation process. The validation process involved meetings with members of CTHRC’s<br />

Provincial Labour Market Information Networks and members from <strong>the</strong> Allied and Associated trades. Adjustments were<br />

made to <strong>the</strong> survey instrument as a result of <strong>the</strong> validation process, and <strong>the</strong> questionnaire was fur<strong>the</strong>r tested through<br />

rigorous in-house protocols to ensure accurate CallWeb-CATI programming of <strong>the</strong> survey instrument. The questionnaire was<br />

made available in both French and English.<br />

2.2 Sample Development<br />

The majority of employers in <strong>the</strong> trucking sector are for-hire companies 3 and can be identified by North American Industry<br />

Classification System (NAICS) 484 (Truck Transportation). However, <strong>the</strong>re is also significant employment in industries for<br />

which truck transportation is not <strong>the</strong> primary line of business (i.e., private carriers 4 ). Examples include fleets operated by<br />

retail establishments for <strong>the</strong> transportation needs of <strong>the</strong>ir organization (e.g., Tim Hortons, Safeway, <strong>Canadian</strong> Tire,<br />

McDonalds, etc.) as well as o<strong>the</strong>r service-providing and goods-manufacturing sectors.<br />

To ensure a comprehensive sample frame was developed for <strong>the</strong> study, R.A. Malatest & Associates Ltd. included companies<br />

from <strong>the</strong> CTHRC member database supplemented with a large sample of employers in <strong>the</strong> trucking and private sectors<br />

from <strong>the</strong> InfoCanada database. All large and medium-sized trucking firms were included in <strong>the</strong> survey sample and<br />

contacted to participate to help maximize coverage of <strong>the</strong> workforce (i.e., a census approach). A sample of small/micro<br />

companies (with between 0 and 99 employees) was randomly selected within each province/territory with a goal of<br />

obtaining a geographic representation of <strong>the</strong> industry proportional to <strong>the</strong> number of companies in each region.<br />

2 The term power unit refers to <strong>the</strong> truck tractor that is <strong>the</strong> control and pulling vehicle for <strong>the</strong> trailer.<br />

3 For hire carriers are those companies whose purpose is to transport freight for remuneration to destinations in domestic or international markets.<br />

4 Private carriers consist of those companies whose principle occupation is not trucking, but has its own fleet of vehicles for transporting its own freight.<br />

2 <strong>Beyond</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Wheel</strong>


2.2.1 <strong>Survey</strong> Administration<br />

The companies included in <strong>the</strong> sample frame had contact information. When an e-mail address was available, <strong>the</strong> initial<br />

approach to all companies was delivery of an e-mail from CTHRC highlighting <strong>the</strong> value of <strong>the</strong> survey to <strong>the</strong> industry and<br />

inviting participation. This introductory e-mail was followed with an e-mail containing an electronic link to an online survey<br />

form. Companies were sent two e-mail reminders.<br />

To supplement <strong>the</strong> e-mail invitation, all known medium-sized and large companies in <strong>the</strong> trucking sector were mailed a<br />

paper copy of <strong>the</strong> questionnaire to complete and return via a business reply envelope (provided to respondents) or fax.<br />

The consultant monitored completions and used telephone follow-up when possible to maximize <strong>the</strong> regional<br />

representation of <strong>the</strong> completed surveys.<br />

When an e-mail address was not available but a fax or telephone number was available, companies were faxed an<br />

invitation to complete <strong>the</strong> questionnaire and contacted by telephone. The study was explained, and <strong>the</strong>y were offered<br />

<strong>the</strong> option of completion by telephone or by online survey. Hard-copy questionnaires was also an option to companies<br />

that requested <strong>the</strong>m.<br />

Full survey administration by R.A. Malatest & Associates Ltd. commenced on October 3, 2011, and continued until<br />

November 14, 2011. To boost <strong>the</strong> representation of Allied and Associated Trades in <strong>the</strong> survey results, Newcom<br />

Business Media Inc. 5 provided a link to its members to complete <strong>the</strong> survey online. In addition, <strong>the</strong> consultant<br />

monitored completions and used telephone follow-up when possible to maximize <strong>the</strong> regional representation of <strong>the</strong><br />

completed surveys.<br />

A total of 1,078 surveys were completed through multiple modes (Table 1).<br />

The majority of <strong>the</strong> survey respondents were companies that belonged to <strong>the</strong> trucking sector; 98% of total survey<br />

respondents were trucking companies (n=1,057) and 2% (n=21) were companies in <strong>the</strong> Allied and Associated<br />

Trades sectors.<br />

Table 1: Mode of <strong>Survey</strong> Completion<br />

Malatest<br />

Mode of Completion<br />

# Completions<br />

Mail/Fax 9<br />

Online 69<br />

Telephone 941<br />

Malatest Subtotal 1,019<br />

NewCom<br />

On-line 38<br />

NewCom Subtotal 38<br />

Total Carriers 1,057<br />

Allied and Associated 21<br />

Total Respondents 1,078<br />

5 NewCom Business Media Inc. is one of Canada’s largest publishers of business to business magazines.<br />

<strong>Beyond</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Wheel</strong><br />

3


2.3 <strong>Survey</strong> Representation and Coverage of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Trucking</strong> Sector<br />

The geographic distribution of survey completions was similar to <strong>the</strong> distribution in <strong>the</strong> database of identified companies,<br />

with a slightly higher representation of firms in Manitoba (Table 2).<br />

Table 2: Geographical Distribution of <strong>Trucking</strong> Companies (Head Office)<br />

Location<br />

NAICS 484 Companies<br />

(2010)<br />

CTHRC <strong>Survey</strong> - <strong>Trucking</strong> Only<br />

Count Percent Count Percent<br />

Alberta 5,313 17% 174 16%<br />

British Columbia 3,720 12% 121 11%<br />

Manitoba 1,056 3% 130 12%<br />

New Brunswick 1,002 3% 33 3%<br />

Newfoundland and Labrador 293 1% 14 1%<br />

Northwest Territories 25


Large and medium-sized companies are well represented in <strong>the</strong> final survey sample, as intended (Table 4). With <strong>the</strong> 2010<br />

Industry Canada company list as <strong>the</strong> standard of comparison, <strong>the</strong> survey respondent sample included all (100%) large<br />

trucking companies and 62% of medium-sized companies. In contrast, <strong>the</strong> final respondent sample contains only 3% of<br />

<strong>the</strong> total number of small companies, as a result of under-sampling from <strong>the</strong> owner-operator segment of <strong>the</strong> industry.<br />

Table 4: Coverage of Employers by Size (# Employees)<br />

Company Size<br />

(Employees)<br />

Companies 2010 1 CTHRC <strong>Survey</strong> -<br />

<strong>Trucking</strong> Companies<br />

Count (n=30,733) Count (n=1,057) Percent Coverage<br />

Small (0 – 99) 30,502 903 3%<br />

Medium (100 – 499) 210 130 62%<br />

Large (500+) 21 24 >100%<br />

1 Source: Industry Canada 2010 – all employers in NAICS 484<br />

The CTHRC survey of <strong>the</strong> trucking sector captured information about 106,535 employees, including 56,003 truck drivers,<br />

collected from 1,057 trucking firms. The survey captured information for approximately 20% of all truck drivers in <strong>the</strong> sector.<br />

Given <strong>the</strong> high coverage of large (>100%) and medium-sized (62%) trucking companies in <strong>the</strong> final survey sample, <strong>the</strong><br />

survey results present a fairly accurate overview of companies in <strong>the</strong> trucking sector with 100 or more employees. 6<br />

However, caution should be used when viewing and interpreting <strong>the</strong> results for smaller firms. 7<br />

6 Based on <strong>the</strong> 2006 Census data, <strong>the</strong>re are a total of 304,895 truck drivers working in all sectors combined.<br />

7 The sample error for <strong>the</strong> medium-sized companies is ±5.1% (at <strong>the</strong> 95% CI), a level considered acceptable for this type of research.<br />

<strong>Beyond</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Wheel</strong><br />

5


3. <strong>Trucking</strong> Company Characteristics<br />

The survey captured specific characteristics of companies in <strong>the</strong> trucking sector. These characteristics are presented in this<br />

section.<br />

3.1 Type of Operator<br />

The majority (67%) of employers in <strong>the</strong> trucking sector are for-hire operators (Table 5). Almost one-quarter (23%) of <strong>the</strong><br />

companies are private operators. 8<br />

Table 5: Type of Operator<br />

Type of Operator Number of Companies % of Companies<br />

For Hire Operator 708 67%<br />

Private Operator 245 23%<br />

Owner Operator 1 104 10%<br />

Total 1,057 100%<br />

Source: 2011 CTHRC <strong>Survey</strong> of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Trucking</strong> Sector QA2<br />

1 Operators who haul trailers or o<strong>the</strong>r equipment using <strong>the</strong>ir own trucks (ei<strong>the</strong>r leased or owned)<br />

As shown in Table 6, <strong>the</strong> majority of companies in all provinces are for-hire operators, with <strong>the</strong> highest saturation occurring<br />

in Quebec (87%) and Saskatchewan (76%). The percentage of private carriers is similar in all provinces (24%-33%)<br />

with <strong>the</strong> exception of Saskatchewan (12%) and Quebec (9%). The highest percentage of owner-operators is in<br />

Manitoba (17%).<br />

Table 6: Type of Operator by Region<br />

Region<br />

Number of Companies<br />

For Hire Private Owner Operator<br />

British Columbia (n=121) 66% 25% 9%<br />

Alberta (n=175) 58% 29% 13%<br />

Saskatchewan (n=41) 76% 12% 12%<br />

Manitoba (n=130) 50% 33% 17%<br />

Ontario (n=299) 68% 24% 8%<br />

Quebec (n=206) 87% 9% 4%<br />

Atlantic Canada (n=78) 59% 29% 12%<br />

International (n=6) 33% 50% 17%<br />

Source: 2011 CTHRC <strong>Survey</strong> of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Trucking</strong> Sector QA2 and QA5; n=1,057. Rows do not sum to 100% as <strong>the</strong> “o<strong>the</strong>r” category is excluded from <strong>the</strong> table<br />

8 Companies that maintain <strong>the</strong>ir own fleets of vehicles primarily for <strong>the</strong> transportation needs of <strong>the</strong>ir organization only.<br />

6 <strong>Beyond</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Wheel</strong>


3.2 Primary Sector of Operation<br />

Of all trucking companies, most (51%) belong to <strong>the</strong> general freight/transportation and warehousing sector (Table 7).<br />

Approximately one-third (34%) identify <strong>the</strong> general freight sector as <strong>the</strong> primary hauling sector 9 for which <strong>the</strong>y move goods.<br />

More than one-quarter of trucking companies haul freight for <strong>the</strong> construction sector (13%) or <strong>the</strong> resource sector (13%).<br />

For <strong>the</strong> most part, <strong>the</strong> primary hauling sector aligns with <strong>the</strong> sector of operation (i.e., companies haul within <strong>the</strong>ir sector of<br />

operation).<br />

Table 7: Companies by Sector of Operation and Primary and Secondary Haul Sectors<br />

Sector<br />

Primary Sector of<br />

Operation (n=1,057)<br />

Primary Hauling Sector*<br />

(n=1,006)<br />

Secondary Hauling Sector**<br />

(n=1,057)<br />

General Freight 51% 34% 11%<br />

Construction 9% 13% 8%<br />

Resource Sector 9% 13% 7%<br />

Haulers of Commodities 8% 10% 5%<br />

Agriculture 6% 8% 5%<br />

Wholesale/Retail Trade 4% 8% 4%<br />

Manufacturing 3% 6% 5%<br />

Utilities 2% 2% 2%<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r 10% 6% 2%<br />

Total 100% 100% na<br />

Source: 2011 CTHRC <strong>Survey</strong> of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Trucking</strong> Sector QA3; n=1,057<br />

*Excludes Not applicable (n=51)<br />

**53% of <strong>the</strong> sample did not identify a secondary hauling sector<br />

As can be seen in Table 8, 41% of owner operators and 59% of for-hire operators haul for <strong>the</strong> general freight sector<br />

compared to 34% of private carriers. Owner operators (20%) are slightly more likely than for-hire (5%) or private carriers<br />

(17%) to haul for <strong>the</strong> construction sector. Private carriers (8%) are slightly more likely to haul for <strong>the</strong> wholesale/retail trade<br />

sector than for-hire (2%) or owner operators (6%).<br />

Table 8: Sector of Operation by Operator Type<br />

Sector For Hire Operator Private Carrier Owner Operator<br />

General Freight 59% 34% 41%<br />

Construction 5% 17% 20%<br />

Resource Sector 8% 10% 10%<br />

Haulers of Commodities 8% 7% 8%<br />

Agriculture 5% 7% 8%<br />

Wholesale/Retail Trade 2% 8% 6%<br />

Manufacturing 2% 4% 3%<br />

Utilities 2% 2% 0%<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r 10% 10% 5%<br />

Source: 2011 CTHRC <strong>Survey</strong> of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Trucking</strong> Sector QA2 and QA3<br />

9 Primary hauling sector refers to <strong>the</strong> sector from which <strong>the</strong> majority of <strong>the</strong> firm’s revenue from hauling is generated. The secondary haul sector generates <strong>the</strong> next highest<br />

amount of revenue.<br />

<strong>Beyond</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Wheel</strong><br />

7


3.3 Distribution of Fleets<br />

<strong>Survey</strong> respondents were asked to identify <strong>the</strong> number of power units located in each province/territory where <strong>the</strong>y<br />

operated and in selected provincial trucking hubs. As presented in Table 9, companies in Ontario account for almost<br />

one-third (30%) of all power units, followed by Alberta (17%) and Quebec (17%). All o<strong>the</strong>r provinces/territories account<br />

for 11% or fewer of total power units.<br />

Table 9: Distribution of Companies with Power Units by Province<br />

Province # Power Units % Power Units<br />

British Columbia 3,481 11%<br />

Alberta 5,457 17%<br />

Saskatchewan 1,948 6%<br />

Manitoba 2,661 8%<br />

Ontario 9,424 30%<br />

Quebec 5,232 17%<br />

New Brunswick 928 3%<br />

Newfoundland and Labrador 504 2%<br />

Nova Scotia 1,292 4%<br />

Prince Edward Island 555 2%<br />

Territories 12 < 1%<br />

Total 31,494 100%<br />

Source: 2011 CTHRC <strong>Survey</strong> of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Trucking</strong> Sector QA8<br />

Company location and fleet size were identified for provincial trucking hubs, as well. As Table 10 shows, <strong>the</strong>re is wide<br />

variation in <strong>the</strong> extent to which offices and fleets are located in <strong>the</strong>se hubs. For example, Winnipeg, Manitoba, accounts for<br />

a large proportion of offices (44%) and power units (54%) in <strong>the</strong> province. In British Columbia, a large proportion of <strong>the</strong><br />

offices (40%) and power units (47%) are located in <strong>the</strong> Lower Mainland area (which includes several provincial trucking<br />

hubs). In contrast, Toronto, Ontario, accounts for 20% of offices and 32% of power units in <strong>the</strong> province.<br />

8 <strong>Beyond</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Wheel</strong>


Table 10: Distribution of Companies with Power Units by Provincial <strong>Trucking</strong> Hubs<br />

Metropolitan Area # Companies % Companies<br />

# Power Units in<br />

<strong>the</strong> Area<br />

% Power Units in<br />

<strong>the</strong> Province<br />

British Columbia - Lower Mainland 63 40% 1,620 47%<br />

Alberta - Calgary 56 22% 1,381 25%<br />

Alberta - Edmonton 73 28% 1,559 29%<br />

Saskatchewan - Saskatoon 27 36% 711 36%<br />

Saskatchewan - Regina 15 20% 244 13%<br />

Manitoba - Winnipeg 71 44% 1,424 54%<br />

Manitoba - Brandon 15 9% 54 2%<br />

Ontario - Toronto 65 20% 2,987 32%<br />

Quebec - Montreal 62 26% 1,617 31%<br />

Quebec - Quebec City 35 14% 577 11%<br />

New Brunswick - Moncton 9 21% 47 5%<br />

Newfoundland and Labrador - St John’s 14 70% 158 31%<br />

Nova Scotia - Halifax 10 31% 297 23%<br />

Prince Edward Island - Charlottetown 4 29% 58 10%<br />

Source: 2011 CTHRC <strong>Survey</strong> of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Trucking</strong> Sector QA8<br />

Companies in provincial trucking hubs are displayed according to <strong>the</strong>ir geographical distribution in Figure 1.<br />

Figure 1: Geographical Distribution of <strong>Trucking</strong> Companies across Provincial <strong>Trucking</strong> Hubs<br />

Source: 2011 CTHRC <strong>Survey</strong> of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Trucking</strong> Sector QA8<br />

<strong>Beyond</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Wheel</strong><br />

9


3.4 Fleet Size<br />

Approximately seven out of 10 survey respondents (69%)<br />

operate fleets of 25 power units or fewer (Table 11). Only<br />

15% of respondents operate large fleets of more than 50<br />

power units. The average fleet size for all companies is 60<br />

power units.<br />

As summarized in Table 12, fleets located in Saskatchewan<br />

and Ontario are more likely to include more than 50 power<br />

units (24% and 19%, respectively) than fleets in o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

provinces (10% to 15%). Small fleets predominate in<br />

Manitoba, where 58% of respondents operate fewer than<br />

10 power units.<br />

Table 12: Fleet Size by Region<br />

Table 11: <strong>Trucking</strong> Companies by Fleet Size<br />

(# Power Units)<br />

Number of Power<br />

Units<br />

Number of Companies %<br />

Less than 10 458 43%<br />

10 to 25 280 26%<br />

26 to 50 156 15%<br />

51 to100 89 8%<br />

More than 100 72 7%<br />

No Data 2 100<br />

British Columbia (n=120) 48% 25% 12% 6% 9%<br />

Alberta (n=174) 41% 25% 20% 8% 6%<br />

Saskatchewan (n=41) 29% 29% 17% 7% 17%<br />

Manitoba (n=130) 58% 23% 9% 5% 5%<br />

Ontario (n=299) 33% 31% 16% 12% 7%<br />

Quebec (n=206) 50% 24% 14% 8% 4%<br />

Atlantic Canada (n=78) 46% 27% 14% 6% 6%<br />

Territories (n=1) 100% 0% 0% 0% 0%<br />

Source: 2011 CTHRC <strong>Survey</strong> of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Trucking</strong> Sector QA7 and region by QA5<br />

On average, companies in Atlantic Canada operate<br />

184 power units apiece, <strong>the</strong> highest average number of<br />

power units per company in <strong>the</strong> country. Saskatchewan<br />

companies operate an average of 43 power units.<br />

Companies in Ontario operate an average of 33 power<br />

units, while <strong>the</strong> average number of power units per<br />

company in Canada is 30 (Table 13). It is important to<br />

note that <strong>the</strong> average number of power units is based on<br />

responses from a relatively higher number of mediumsized<br />

and large firms. Small firms and owner-operators<br />

were under-represented in <strong>the</strong> survey.<br />

Table 13: Average Number of Power Units per Company<br />

by Province<br />

Province<br />

Average # Power Units per<br />

Company<br />

British Columbia 25<br />

Alberta 25<br />

Saskatchewan 43<br />

Manitoba 24<br />

Ontario 33<br />

Quebec 24<br />

Atlantic Canada 184<br />

Territories 6<br />

Canada 30<br />

Source: 2011 CTHRC <strong>Survey</strong> of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Trucking</strong> Sector QA8<br />

10 <strong>Beyond</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Wheel</strong>


Comparing trucking hubs in <strong>the</strong> country (Table 14), companies located in Toronto operate <strong>the</strong> highest average number of<br />

power units (46 units per company). The average number of power units per company in most o<strong>the</strong>r provincial trucking<br />

hubs ranges from 20 to 30, with <strong>the</strong> exception of companies located in Charlottetown, PEI (15), Quebec City (16),<br />

Regina, SK (16), St. John’s (11), Brandon, MB (4) and Moncton, NB (5).<br />

Table 14: Average Number of Power Units for Companies in Selected Provincial <strong>Trucking</strong> Hubs<br />

Provincial <strong>Trucking</strong> Hubs<br />

British Columbia - Lower Mainland 26<br />

Alberta - Calgary 25<br />

Alberta - Edmonton 21<br />

Saskatchewan - Saskatoon 26<br />

Saskatchewan - Regina 16<br />

Manitoba - Winnipeg 20<br />

Manitoba - Brandon 4<br />

Ontario - Toronto 46<br />

Quebec - Montreal 26<br />

Quebec - Quebec City 16<br />

New Brunswick - Moncton 5<br />

Newfoundland and Labrador - St John’s 11<br />

Nova Scotia - Halifax 30<br />

Prince Edward Island - Charlottetown 15<br />

Average #<br />

Power Units per Company<br />

Source: 2011 CTHRC <strong>Survey</strong> of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Trucking</strong> Sector QA8<br />

3.5 Hauling Type<br />

Nearly two-thirds (62%) of trucking companies run short-haul 10 trips (Table 15). There is a fairly even split between<br />

companies that offer cross-border hauling to <strong>the</strong> U.S. (47%) and companies that haul domestically only (53%).<br />

Table 15: <strong>Survey</strong> Responses by Type of Hauling<br />

Type of Hauling # of Companies %<br />

Long Haul (more than 500km or more than one day) 393 37%<br />

Short Haul (less than 500km or less than one day 648 62%<br />

Cross Border Hauling (US) 486 47%<br />

Domestic Only 555 53%<br />

Total 1,041 100%<br />

Source: 2011 CTHRC <strong>Survey</strong> of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Trucking</strong> Sector QA4<br />

10 Less than 500km or less than one day.<br />

<strong>Beyond</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Wheel</strong><br />

11


As summarized in Table 16, private operators (25%) and owner-operators (24%) are similarly likely to do long-haul trips.<br />

For-hire operators are most likely to do cross-border hauling to <strong>the</strong> U.S. (33%). Owner-operators are least likely to do long<br />

haul trips (24%) or cross-border hauling (16%).<br />

Table 16: Type of Hauling by Operator Type<br />

Type of Company Long Haul Short Haul US Haul Domestic Haul<br />

For Hire Carrier 309 44% 386 56% 232 33% 463 67%<br />

Private Carrier 26 25% 77 75% 25 24% 78 76%<br />

Owner Operator 58 24% 185 76% 39 16% 204 84%<br />

Total 393 38% 648 62% 296 28% 745 72%<br />

Source: 2011 CTHRC <strong>Survey</strong> of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Trucking</strong> Sector QA2 and QA4<br />

Smaller fleets of 25 or fewer power units are less likely to do long-haul trips than companies with fleets of more than 25<br />

power units (Table 17). Of fleets with fewer than 25 power units, 34% do long-haul trips compared to 50% of companies<br />

with larger fleets. Among larger fleets with more than 25 power units, 38% haul across <strong>the</strong> U.S. border compared to 26%<br />

of fleets with fewer than 25 power units.<br />

Table 17: Type of Hauling by Fleet Size<br />

Fleet Size Long Haul Short Haul US Haul Domestic Haul<br />

Less than 10 (n=464) 132 29% 319 71% 98 22% 353 78%<br />

10 to 25 (n=290) 105 38% 169 62% 80 29% 194 71%<br />

26 to 50 (n=159) 77 50% 77 50% 57 37% 97 63%<br />

51 to100 (n=97) 45 51% 44 49% 33 37% 56 63%<br />

More than 100 (n=81) 34 48% 37 52% 28 39% 43 61%<br />

Total 393 38% 646 62% 296 28% 743 72%<br />

Source: 2011 CTHRC <strong>Survey</strong> of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Trucking</strong> Sector QA4 and QA7<br />

Companies in <strong>the</strong> general freight sector are more likely to do long-haul trips (49%) and cross-border hauling (39%) than<br />

companies in o<strong>the</strong>r sectors (Table 18). Companies in <strong>the</strong> construction sector are least likely to do long-haul trips (14%).<br />

Construction (7%) and resource sector (9%) companies are least likely to do cross-border hauling.<br />

12 <strong>Beyond</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Wheel</strong>


Table 18: Type of Hauling by Sector of Operation<br />

Sector Long Haul Short Haul Cross Border (US Haul) Domestic Haul<br />

General Freight (n=533) 260 49% 273 51% 206 39% 327 61%<br />

Wholesale/Retail Trade (n=40) 14 35% 26 65% 9 23% 31 78%<br />

Manufacturing (n=27) 6 22% 21 78% 8 30% 19 70%<br />

Resource Sector (n=88) 20 23% 68 77% 6 7% 82 93%<br />

Construction (n=95) 13 14% 82 86% 9 9% 86 91%<br />

Utilities (n=18) 5 28% 13 72% 2 11% 16 89%<br />

Agriculture (n=59) 18 31% 41 69% 11 19% 48 81%<br />

Haulers of Commodities<br />

(n=81)<br />

24 30% 57 70% 17 21% 64 79%<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r (n=100) 33 33% 67 67% 28 28% 72 72%<br />

Total 393 38% 648 62% 296 28% 745 72%<br />

Source: 2011 CTHRC <strong>Survey</strong> of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Trucking</strong> Sector QA3 and QA4<br />

<strong>Beyond</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Wheel</strong><br />

13


4. Workforce Profile<br />

This section presents a profile of employees represented in <strong>the</strong> survey of employers.<br />

4.1 Total Employees<br />

Not surprisingly, considering <strong>the</strong> distribution of companies and power units, Ontario accounts for more employees in <strong>the</strong><br />

trucking sector (37%) than o<strong>the</strong>r provinces (Table 19), followed by BC (21%) and Alberta (12%). The highest average<br />

number of employees per company occurs in British Columbia (154) and Ontario (114). 11<br />

Table 19: Total Employees by Region<br />

Region<br />

Number of<br />

Companies<br />

Average Number<br />

per Company<br />

Total Number of<br />

Employees<br />

% of Employees<br />

British Columbia 121 154 18,346 21%<br />

Alberta 174 62 10,648 12%<br />

Saskatchewan 41 69 2,848 3%<br />

Manitoba 130 65 7,758 9%<br />

Ontario 299 114 33,333 37%<br />

Quebec 206 46 9,431 11%<br />

Atlantic Canada 78 82 6,409 7%<br />

Nor<strong>the</strong>rn Canada 1 102 102 < 1%<br />

International 7 27 190 < 1%<br />

Total 1,057 86 89,065 100%<br />

Source: 2011 CTHRC <strong>Survey</strong> of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Trucking</strong> Sector QB1a<br />

Companies with fewer than 100 employees predominate in <strong>the</strong> trucking industry (Table 20), accounting for 85% of <strong>the</strong><br />

total. While <strong>the</strong>se smaller companies account for <strong>the</strong> majority of <strong>the</strong> sample, <strong>the</strong>y represent only 21% of <strong>the</strong> total<br />

employees covered by <strong>the</strong> survey. In contrast, large companies with 500 or more employees represent only 2% of <strong>the</strong><br />

sample but account for 56% of <strong>the</strong> total number of employees. The remaining 24% of employees work for medium-sized<br />

companies(100 to 199 employees), which account for 12% of <strong>the</strong> total survey sample.<br />

Table 20: Employees by Size of Company<br />

Size of Company Number of Companies Number of Employees<br />

Small (0-99) 903 85% 22,049 21%<br />

Medium (100-499) 130 12% 25,297 24%<br />

Large (500+) 24 2% 59,189 56%<br />

Total 1,057 100% 106,535 100%<br />

Source: 2011 CTHRC <strong>Survey</strong> of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Trucking</strong> Sector QA8<br />

Note that sums may not equal 100% due to rounding<br />

11 There is a company in BC with 14,000 employees (highest for any company) and Atlantic Canada has two companies with roughly 2,000 each.<br />

14 <strong>Beyond</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Wheel</strong>


For-hire operators account for 67% of employees in <strong>the</strong> survey (Table 21). Private carriers and owner-operators<br />

account for 32% and 1% of employees, respectively. The average number of employees per company is lowest among<br />

owner-operators (10). Private carriers employ <strong>the</strong> highest average number (121).<br />

Table 21: Total Employees by Type of Operator<br />

Type of Operator<br />

Average Number of<br />

Employees per Company<br />

Total Number of Employees<br />

% of Employment<br />

For Hire Operator 84 59,377 67%<br />

Owner Operator 10 883 1%<br />

Private Carriers 121 28,805 32%<br />

Total 72 89,065 100%<br />

Source: 2011 CTHRC <strong>Survey</strong> of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Trucking</strong> Sector QA2 and QB1<br />

Companies with more than 100 power units account for 24% of total employment in <strong>the</strong> industry (Table 22). Fleets with<br />

10 to 25 power units account for 12%. On average, <strong>the</strong> largest fleets (i.e., more than 100 power units) employ an average<br />

of 603 people. Contrary to expectations, fleets of 10 to 25 employ more people (78 employees), on average, than fleets of<br />

26 to 50 (59 employees).<br />

Table 22: Employees by Fleet Size<br />

Number of Power Units<br />

Average Number of<br />

Employees per Company<br />

Total Employees<br />

% of Employment<br />

Less than 10 15 6,395 4%<br />

10 to 25 78 21,478 12%<br />

26 to 50 59 9,225 5%<br />

51 to 100 96 8,517 24%<br />

More than 100 603 43,442 50%<br />

Total/Overall Average 87 89,057 100%<br />

Source: 2011 CTHRC <strong>Survey</strong> of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Trucking</strong> Sector QA2 and QB1<br />

Of <strong>the</strong> total workforce, <strong>the</strong> majority of employees (58%) work for firms that do short hauls, and 49% of truck drivers are<br />

employed by short-haul companies (Table 23).<br />

Table 23: Employees by Type of Hauling<br />

Type of Hauling Average per Company Total Employees % of Employment<br />

Long Haul 92 35,248 39%<br />

Short Haul 82 51,492 58%<br />

Cross Border Hauling 110 31,775 36%<br />

Domestic Only 76 54,965 62%<br />

Source: 2011 CTHRC <strong>Survey</strong> of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Trucking</strong> Sector QA4 and QB1<br />

<strong>Beyond</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Wheel</strong><br />

15


4.2 Employment in Key Occupations<br />

Not surprisingly, drivers account for <strong>the</strong> majority (73%) of employees in trucking companies. The remaining 27% of<br />

employees directly support truck drivers (Table 24). Almost half (47%) of company truck drivers hold a Class 1/AZ licence<br />

(excluding owner-operator drivers, of whom 22% hold a class 1/AZ licence). Almost two-thirds of companies (60%)<br />

employ a dispatcher.<br />

Table 24: Employees by Occupation/Group<br />

Truck Occupations<br />

Type of Operator<br />

Average Number of<br />

Employees per Company<br />

Total Number of<br />

Employees<br />

% of Employment<br />

Company Truck Drivers (Class 1/AZ) 37 35,689 47%<br />

Company Truck Drivers (Class 3/D) 12 3,115 4%<br />

Owner/Operator Truck Drivers 39 17,199 22%<br />

Shunt Drivers (Class 1/AZ or 3/D) 78 6,090 8%<br />

Cargo Workers 23 3,275 4%<br />

Dispatchers 4 2,640 3%<br />

Freight Claims/Safety & Loss Prevention<br />

Specialists<br />

2 596 1%<br />

Foreman/Supervisor/Manager 5 3,250 4%<br />

Allied and Associated Trades Occupations<br />

Truck/Transport Mechanic 6 2,960 4%<br />

Transport Trailer Technician 6 609 1%<br />

Parts Technicians/Parts Person 3 334


4.3 Employee Demographics<br />

In a male-dominated sector, it is not surprising to find that only 4% of workers in <strong>the</strong> trucking industry are women.<br />

However, female employment varies considerably among <strong>the</strong> key occupations. While females account for fewer than 5%<br />

of drivers (including shunt drivers), as well as mechanics, transport trailer technicians and cargo workers, <strong>the</strong>y account for<br />

25% of freight claims/safety & loss prevention specialists, 13% of parts technicians/parts persons, and 19% of dispatchers<br />

(Table 26).<br />

Table 26: Women in <strong>the</strong> Workforce by Occupation<br />

Occupation Total Employees # Women % Women<br />

Company truck drivers (class 1/AZ) 35,689 1,208 3%<br />

Owner/operator truck drivers (include total number of drivers) 17,199 631 4%<br />

Shunt drivers (Class1/AZ or 3D) 6,090 22


Table 28: Women in <strong>the</strong> Workforce by Operator Type<br />

Type of operator # Women % Women<br />

For Hire Operator 2,611 85%<br />

Owner Operator 38 1%<br />

Private Operator 413 13%<br />

Total 3,062 100%<br />

Source: 2011 CTHRC <strong>Survey</strong> of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Trucking</strong> Sector QA2 and QC3<br />

In terms of age, 64% of <strong>the</strong> industry’s workforce is between <strong>the</strong> ages of 30 and 54 years (Table 29). With <strong>the</strong> exception of<br />

shunt drivers, truck drivers tend to be 45 years old or older. Among truck drivers, 31% of owner-operators are in <strong>the</strong><br />

youngest age group (30 years and younger) compared to Class 3/D drivers (20%) and Class 1/AZ drivers (13%).<br />

Cargo workers are <strong>the</strong> youngest employees, with 51% aged 30 or younger.<br />

Table 29: Employee Age Profile by Occupation<br />

Occupation<br />

Total<br />

Employees<br />

30 years<br />

and under<br />

31 to<br />

44 years<br />

45 to<br />

54 years<br />

55 years<br />

and over<br />

Company truck drivers (class 1/AZ) 35,689 13% 30% 36% 22%<br />

Company truck drivers (class 3/D) 3,115 20% 40% 27% 12%<br />

Owner/operator truck drivers 17,199 31% 20% 27% 22%<br />

Shunt drivers (class 1/AZ or 3D) 6,090 1% 89% 8% 1%<br />

Truck/transport mechanic 2,960 23% 33% 35% 9%<br />

Foreman/supervisor/manager 3,250 15% 39% 34% 12%<br />

Freight claims/safety & loss prevention<br />

specialists<br />

596 12% 38% 33% 16%<br />

Dispatchers 2,640 16% 46% 29% 10%<br />

Transport trailer technician 609 26% 37% 26% 11%<br />

Parts technicians/parts person 334 16% 45% 32% 7%<br />

Cargo workers 3,275 51% 26% 19% 4%<br />

Total 75,757 19% 34% 30% 17%<br />

Source: 2011 CTHRC <strong>Survey</strong> of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Trucking</strong> Sector QC3; Excludes employees in occupations outside <strong>the</strong> key trucking-related occupations (e.g., general labourers, administrative<br />

staff, accounts, etc.) Therefore <strong>the</strong> totals in <strong>the</strong> table do not equal 100% and are lower than <strong>the</strong> total number of employees covered by <strong>the</strong> survey.<br />

The employee age of owner-operators, for-hire operators and private carriers was similar for all age categories (Table 30).<br />

Table 30: Employee Age Profile by Type of Operator<br />

Type of Operator<br />

30 years<br />

and under<br />

31 to<br />

44 years<br />

45 to<br />

54 years<br />

55 years<br />

and over<br />

For Hire Operator 19% 34% 29% 18%<br />

Owner Operator 15% 39% 30% 17%<br />

Private Carrier 16% 34% 33% 16%<br />

Source: 2011 CTHRC <strong>Survey</strong> of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Trucking</strong> Sector QA2 and QC3<br />

18 <strong>Beyond</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Wheel</strong>


The distribution of employees by age group for small and medium-sized companies is similar, with most employees falling<br />

between <strong>the</strong> ages of 30 and 55 (Table 31). Large companies tend to attract younger employees: 23% of <strong>the</strong> employees<br />

in large companies are 30 years or younger compared to 15% in medium-sized and 13% in small companies.<br />

Table 31: Employee Age Profile by Size of Company<br />

Size of Company<br />

30 years<br />

and under<br />

31 to<br />

44 years<br />

45 to<br />

54 years<br />

55 years<br />

and over<br />

Small (0-99) 13% 38% 32% 17%<br />

Medium (100-499) 15% 35% 33% 16%<br />

Large (500+) 23% 31% 28% 18%<br />

Source: 2011 CTHRC <strong>Survey</strong> of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Trucking</strong> Sector QB1a and QC3<br />

The youngest employees in trucking-related occupations work in <strong>the</strong> general freight sector, where 58% are under 45 years<br />

of age (Table 32). The oldest employees work in manufacturing and commodities hauling, where 58% are 45 or older.<br />

Table 32: Employee Age Profile by Occupation<br />

Sector<br />

Total<br />

Employees<br />

30 years<br />

and under<br />

30 to<br />

44 years<br />

45 to<br />

54 years<br />

55 years<br />

and over<br />

General Freight 40,514 22% 36% 25% 18%<br />

Wholesale/Retail Trade 8,743 19% 26% 38% 18%<br />

Manufacturing 2,856 12% 30% 36% 22%<br />

Resource Sector 7,004 17% 30% 38% 15%<br />

Construction 2,557 16% 35% 35% 13%<br />

Utilities 561 18% 37% 26% 19%<br />

Agriculture 2,314 16% 31% 30% 23%<br />

Haulers of Commodities 6,509 11% 31% 42% 16%<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r 3,199 13% 40% 30% 17%<br />

Source: 2011 CTHRC <strong>Survey</strong> of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Trucking</strong> Sector QA3 and QC3<br />

<strong>Beyond</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Wheel</strong><br />

19


5. Industry Demand<br />

This section examines industry demand for employees and covers <strong>the</strong> following issues:<br />

••<br />

Current vacancies;<br />

••<br />

Employee turnover/retention;<br />

••<br />

Future demand; and<br />

••<br />

Recruitment.<br />

5.1 Current Vacancies<br />

<strong>Survey</strong> respondents were asked to provide <strong>the</strong> current number of unfilled positions in each occupation group covered by<br />

<strong>the</strong> survey. Three in ten (30%) companies reported at least one unfilled position in a key occupational group within <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

company. Respondents reported a total of 3,764 unfilled positions among all employers (Table 33).<br />

The largest vacancy rates occur in driving occupations: truck drivers, and particularly company truck drivers with a<br />

class 1/AZ licence, account for 46% of all unfilled positions.<br />

Table 33: Unfilled Positions by Occupation<br />

Driving Occupations<br />

Type of Occupation<br />

# Unfilled<br />

Positions<br />

% Unfilled<br />

Positions<br />

Company Truck Drivers (Class 1/AZ) 1,747 46%<br />

Owner/Operator Truck Drivers 1,234 33%<br />

Company Truck Drivers (Class 3/D) 134 4%<br />

Shunt Drivers (Class 1/AZ or 3/D) 21 1%<br />

Non-Driver Occupations<br />

Dispatchers 59 2%<br />

Cargo Workers 55 1%<br />

Freight Claims/Safety & Loss Prevention Specialists 21 1%<br />

Foreman/Supervisor/Manager 50 1%<br />

Allied and Associated Trades<br />

Truck/Transport Mechanic 197 5%<br />

Transport Trailer Technician 37 1%<br />

Parts Technicians/Parts Person 2


The survey population identified a total of 3,178 unfilled positions in <strong>the</strong> trucking industry (Table 34). The majority of <strong>the</strong>se<br />

unfilled positions (27%) are in Alberta.<br />

Table 34: Top Unfilled Positions by Province – <strong>Trucking</strong><br />

Region<br />

Company Truck Drivers<br />

(Class 1/AZ)<br />

Owner/Operator<br />

Truck Drivers (include total<br />

number of drivers)<br />

Truck/Transport<br />

Mechanic<br />

Alberta 468 27% 299 24% 94 48%<br />

British Columbia 179 10% 158 13% 16 8%<br />

Manitoba 386 22% 66 5% 14 7%<br />

Ontario 403 23% 216 18% 31 16%<br />

Quebec 122 7% 63 5% 16 8%<br />

Saskatchewan 144 8% 163 13% 19 10%<br />

Atlantic Canada 45 3% 269 22% 7 4%<br />

Total 1,747 100% 1,234 100% 197 100%<br />

Source: 2011 CTHRC <strong>Survey</strong> of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Trucking</strong> Sector QA5 and QB2<br />

5.2 Retention<br />

Employee retention was addressed by estimating <strong>the</strong> turnover rate from information provided about employee leaving<br />

patterns, specifically those who leave <strong>the</strong> company within 12 months of employment and those who leave after 12 months<br />

of employment. The following calculation was used to determine <strong>the</strong> average turnover rate:<br />

Average turnover rate =<br />

Sum of job separations<br />

Sum of total employees<br />

The estimated turnover rate for employees who worked for a trucking company for less than 12 months was 7%, on<br />

average. For those employed with a company for more than 12 months, <strong>the</strong> turnover rate decreased to 5%.<br />

5.3 Future Workforce<br />

<strong>Survey</strong> respondents were asked to estimate <strong>the</strong> expected<br />

change in labour force demand in <strong>the</strong> trucking sector over<br />

<strong>the</strong> next 12 months and over <strong>the</strong> next five years.<br />

Respondents were fairly evenly split about whe<strong>the</strong>r and how<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir company’s labour force demand would change over <strong>the</strong><br />

next 12 months: 46% said <strong>the</strong>re would be no change, and<br />

43% expected demand to increase. Five percent (5%)<br />

expected a decrease in demand, and 6% didn’t know.<br />

Approximately one-third (31%) said demand would increase<br />

by as much as 10% over <strong>the</strong> next 12 months (Table 35).<br />

About one in 10 (11%) expected <strong>the</strong> increase to be larger<br />

(i.e., more than 11%).<br />

Table 35: Expected Labour force Demand (12 months out)<br />

Amount of Growth Count Percent<br />

No Change 507 46%<br />

Increase (1% to 5%) 179 17%<br />

Increase (6% to 10%) 156 14%<br />

Increase (11% to 15%) 36 3%<br />

Increase (15%+) 84 8%<br />

Decrease (1% to 5%) 12 1%<br />

Decrease (6% to 10%) 6 1%<br />

Decrease (11% to 15%) 4 1%<br />

Decrease (15%+) 25 2%<br />

Don’t know 68 6%<br />

Total* 1,077 100%<br />

Source: 2011 CTHRC <strong>Survey</strong> of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Trucking</strong> Sector QD1a, b;<br />

Excludes cases with missing information<br />

<strong>Beyond</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Wheel</strong><br />

21


<strong>Beyond</strong> <strong>the</strong> next 12 months, companies expect<br />

greater demand for employees. Almost half<br />

(45%) expect labour force demand to increase<br />

over <strong>the</strong> next five years, 26% expect demand to<br />

stay <strong>the</strong> same and 5% expect it to decrease.<br />

Twenty-one percent (21%) could not provide an<br />

answer. Asked to quantify <strong>the</strong> increase or<br />

decrease in labour force demand, only 68% of<br />

respondents who indicated a change in demand<br />

provided an answer (n=526). Table 36 shows<br />

that 57% of <strong>the</strong>se companies expect an increase<br />

in labour market demand of 10% or less.<br />

5.4 Recruitment<br />

Table 36: Expected Change in Labour Force Demand (5 years out)<br />

Amount of Growth Count Percent<br />

Increase (1% to 5%) 162 31%<br />

Increase (6% to 10%) 135 26%<br />

Increase (11% to 15%) 49 9%<br />

Increase (15%+) 128 24%<br />

Decrease (1% to 5%) 14 3%<br />

Decrease (6% to 10%) 5 1%<br />

Decrease (11% to 15%) 5 1%<br />

Decrease (15%+) 28 5%<br />

Total 526 100%<br />

Source: 2011 CTHRC <strong>Survey</strong> of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Trucking</strong> Sector QD2a<br />

<strong>Survey</strong> respondents were asked to rate <strong>the</strong>ir degree of difficulty in filling vacancies in trucking and related occupations.<br />

Almost six in 10 (59%) said it is difficult/very difficult to fill vacancies for Class 1/AZ truck drivers, and 52% said it was<br />

difficult/very difficult to find owner-operators. Almost half (48%) had difficulty filling positions for Class 3/D drivers<br />

(Figure 2). The difficulty in recruiting for <strong>the</strong>se types of positions offers one reason why <strong>the</strong>re are more vacancies in driving<br />

occupations than in o<strong>the</strong>r occupations in <strong>the</strong> industry and why <strong>the</strong>re is a shortage of drivers in <strong>the</strong> trucking sector. O<strong>the</strong>r<br />

difficult positions to fill include transport trailer technicians (68%) and truck/transport mechanics (53%). Both occupations<br />

belong to <strong>the</strong> Allied and Associated trades.<br />

Truck drivers, mostly company truck drivers with a class 1/AZ licence, account for <strong>the</strong> greatest percentage of unfilled<br />

positions in <strong>the</strong> industry and are reported to be <strong>the</strong> most difficult occupations to fill.<br />

Figure 2: Degree of Difficulty Filling Positions by Occupation<br />

17% 25% 59%<br />

27% 25% 48%<br />

29% 19% 52%<br />

28% 13% 60%<br />

27% 20% 53%<br />

19% 13% 68%<br />

31% 11% 58%<br />

30% 9% 61%<br />

31% 11% 58%<br />

25% 14% 61%<br />

30% 13% 57%<br />

Source: 2011 CTHRC <strong>Survey</strong> of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Trucking</strong> Sector QC2; total may not sum to exactly to100% due to rounding<br />

22 <strong>Beyond</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Wheel</strong>


Appendix A:<br />

Allied and Associated Trades<br />

<strong>Survey</strong> <strong>Technical</strong> <strong>Report</strong><br />

<strong>Beyond</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Wheel</strong><br />

23


Table of Contents<br />

1. Introduction. ...................................................................................................................................................25<br />

2. <strong>Survey</strong> Methodology. ................................................................................................................................26<br />

2.1. Development of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Survey</strong> Instrument. ...................................................................................................26<br />

2.2 Sample Development .................................................................................................................................26<br />

2.2.1 <strong>Survey</strong> Administration .......................................................................................................................27<br />

2.3 Respondent Characteristics ........................................................................................................................27<br />

2.4 Employer Sector. ...........................................................................................................................................27<br />

3. Workforce Profile. .......................................................................................................................................29<br />

3.1 Employment in Key Occupations ..............................................................................................................29<br />

3.2 Employee Demographics ...........................................................................................................................30<br />

4. Industry Demand. ........................................................................................................................................32<br />

4.1 Current Vacancies .......................................................................................................................................32<br />

4.2 Retention ......................................................................................................................................................33<br />

4.3 Recruitment .................................................................................................................................................33<br />

24 <strong>Beyond</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Wheel</strong>


1. Introduction<br />

The <strong>Canadian</strong> <strong>Trucking</strong> Human Resources Council (CTHRC) has been in operation since January 1994. It is a national<br />

organization governed by a Board of Directors that represents a variety of interests within <strong>the</strong> trucking industry. 1 The CTHRC<br />

was formed during a period of de-regulation in <strong>the</strong> trucking industry and is committed to <strong>the</strong> development of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Canadian</strong><br />

trucking industry by supporting human resource needs and responding with research, training, and advice.<br />

The CTHRC is currently conducting <strong>the</strong> Labour Market Information (LMI) Project, <strong>the</strong> goal of which is to enable <strong>the</strong> CTHRC<br />

to provide complete, accurate and timely forecasts/projections for key trucking occupations. A survey (CTHRC <strong>Survey</strong> of <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>Trucking</strong> Sector) of employers was completed with companies in <strong>the</strong> trucking sector and companies who hire employees in<br />

allied and associated trades to collect information about <strong>the</strong>ir current workforce, and projected workforce needs. The<br />

majority of survey respondents were companies in <strong>the</strong> trucking sector as few responses were obtained from companies in<br />

<strong>the</strong> allied and associated trades sector. In order to provide an accurate and representative evaluation of <strong>the</strong> current<br />

occupations within <strong>the</strong> industry an additional survey was conducted that targeted companies in <strong>the</strong> allied and associated<br />

trades (Allied and Associated Trades <strong>Survey</strong>).<br />

Organizations in <strong>the</strong> allied and associated trades employ individuals who, while not directly employed by <strong>the</strong> truck<br />

transportation firms, provide critical support to <strong>the</strong> trucking sector. In general, companies in <strong>the</strong> allied and associated trades<br />

employ individuals in <strong>the</strong> following occupations: truck/transport mechanic, transport trailer technician, and parts technician.<br />

The information obtained from this study was used to provide additional information as to <strong>the</strong> employment characteristics<br />

of workers in <strong>the</strong>se “support” sectors. Originally this information was to be collected by <strong>the</strong> CTHRC <strong>Survey</strong> of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Trucking</strong><br />

Sector, however, due to limited responses to <strong>the</strong> survey (only 25 completions), <strong>the</strong> CTHRC commissioned R.A. Malatest &<br />

Associates Ltd. to complete a separate survey of allied and associated trade employers, with <strong>the</strong> goal of obtaining 200<br />

survey completions. Information from this survey was subsequently incorporated into <strong>the</strong> HR Benchmarking Tool developed<br />

as part of <strong>the</strong> LMI Project.<br />

The results of <strong>the</strong> Allied and Associated Trades <strong>Survey</strong> are presented in this report. Detailed information on worker<br />

characteristics can be accessed via <strong>the</strong> CTHRC LMI tool (http://stg.cthrc.com/lih/en/). The remainder of this report is<br />

organized as follows:<br />

Section 2: <strong>Survey</strong> Methodology<br />

Section 3: Workforce Profile<br />

Section 4: Industry Demand<br />

1 <strong>Canadian</strong> <strong>Trucking</strong> Human Resources Council. (2010). Retrieved February 20, 2012 from CTHRC Web Site: http://www.cthrc.com/en/content/about-us<br />

<strong>Beyond</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Wheel</strong><br />

25


2: <strong>Survey</strong> Methodology<br />

Several activities were completed for <strong>the</strong> survey component of <strong>the</strong> project. Each activity is described in <strong>the</strong> remainder of<br />

this section.<br />

2.1 Development of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Survey</strong> Instrument<br />

The CTHRC <strong>Survey</strong> of <strong>the</strong> Allied and Associated Trades was designed to collect information about <strong>the</strong> characteristics of this<br />

sector and <strong>the</strong>ir workforce. As part of <strong>the</strong> survey design, information on <strong>the</strong> three key occupations was identified for<br />

inclusion in <strong>the</strong> study:<br />

••<br />

Truck/Transport Mechanic (heavy duty): Inspect, test, diagnose and repair truck and truck-tractor engines and o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

key operating systems.<br />

••<br />

Transport Trailer Technician (heavy duty): Repair, overhaul, inspect and maintain <strong>the</strong> suspension, brake and electrical<br />

systems on trailers.<br />

••<br />

Parts Technicians (Parts Person): Responsible for ordering, warehousing, inventory control and sales of parts.<br />

The survey consisted of three sections:<br />

••<br />

Your Organization (i.e., classification and location);<br />

••<br />

Your Workforce (i.e., number of employees in each occupation); and<br />

••<br />

Retention of Workforce (i.e., staff turnover, difficulty filling occupations, and age profile of current employees).<br />

To ensure <strong>the</strong> questionnaire was appropriate for employers in <strong>the</strong> allied and associated trades; it was reviewed and pilot<br />

tested through a validation process. The validation process involved six meetings with members of Provincial Labour Market<br />

Networks and members from <strong>the</strong> Allied and Associated Trades. Adjustments were made to <strong>the</strong> survey instrument as a<br />

result of <strong>the</strong> validation process, and <strong>the</strong> questionnaire was fur<strong>the</strong>r tested through rigorous in-house protocols to ensure<br />

accurate CallWeb-CATI programming of <strong>the</strong> survey instrument. The questionnaire was made available in both French and<br />

English. A copy of <strong>the</strong> finalized survey instrument is provided in Appendix A.<br />

2.2 Sample Development<br />

The sample included all companies in <strong>the</strong> allied and associated trades from <strong>the</strong> first survey (<strong>Survey</strong> of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Trucking</strong> Sector)<br />

and a new sample that targeted only companies in <strong>the</strong> allied and associated trades across Canada.<br />

The majority of companies in <strong>the</strong> allied and associated trades can be identified by <strong>the</strong> Standard Industrial Classification<br />

Codes (SIC) 37 (Transportation Equipment Manufacturing).<br />

To ensure a comprehensive sample frame was developed for <strong>the</strong> study, R.A. Malatest & Associates Ltd. included companies<br />

from <strong>the</strong> CTHRC member database and a large sample of employers in <strong>the</strong> allied and associated trades sectors from <strong>the</strong><br />

InfoCanada database (using <strong>the</strong> SIC codes).<br />

The SIC codes and specific types of businesses included in <strong>the</strong> sample were:<br />

••<br />

371109 - Truck-Manufacturers<br />

••<br />

371410 - Truck Equipment & Parts-Manufacturers<br />

••<br />

3715 - Truck Trailers (Manufacturers)<br />

••<br />

379901 - Manufacturers-Trailers<br />

••<br />

379908 - Trailers-Equipment & Parts-Manufacturers<br />

••<br />

753812 - Truck-Repairing & Service<br />

••<br />

753813 - Trailers-Repairing & Service<br />

26 <strong>Beyond</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Wheel</strong>


2.2.1 <strong>Survey</strong> Administration<br />

All companies included in <strong>the</strong> sample frame had contact information. In order to maximize <strong>the</strong> representativeness of <strong>the</strong><br />

completed surveys by region, companies were contacted by telephone during business hours. The study was explained and<br />

company personnel were invited to complete <strong>the</strong> survey by telephone.<br />

Full survey administration by R.A. Malatest & Associates Ltd. commenced on April 17, 2012 and continued until April 24,<br />

2012. A total of 231 surveys were completed, which was greater than <strong>the</strong> initial target of 200 completions.<br />

2.3 Respondent Characteristics<br />

A key requirement of <strong>the</strong> study was to ensure that <strong>the</strong>re was sufficient representation from each province and/or region in<br />

Canada to support <strong>the</strong> development of workforce probes at ei<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> provincial and/or sub-sector level. In this context, one<br />

goal was to obtain a minimum of 20 completions for most provinces, with <strong>the</strong> exception of <strong>the</strong> smaller Atlantic Provinces in<br />

which <strong>the</strong>re are relatively few employers. As highlighted in Table 1, <strong>the</strong>re was a minimum of 20 employer responses for<br />

each province with <strong>the</strong> exception of PEI (10 employer responses) and Newfoundland and Labrador (5 employer<br />

responses).<br />

Table A1: Geographical Distribution of Allied and Associated Trades Companies (Head Office)<br />

Location<br />

CTHRC <strong>Survey</strong> – Allied and Associated Trades<br />

Count<br />

Percent<br />

Alberta 28 12%<br />

British Columbia 21 9%<br />

Manitoba 20 9%<br />

New Brunswick 19 8%<br />

Newfoundland and Labrador 5 2%<br />

Nova Scotia 21 9%<br />

Ontario 40 17%<br />

Prince Edward Island 10 4%<br />

Quebec 44 19%<br />

Saskatchewan 22 10%<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r 1


Table A2: Employer Sector by Region<br />

Region<br />

Employer Sector<br />

Trailer Sales, Service<br />

and Leasing<br />

Truck and Trailer<br />

Manufacturer<br />

Truck Sales, Services,<br />

and Leasing<br />

British Columbia (n=26) 15% 4% 81%<br />

Alberta (n=20) 5% 0 95%<br />

Manitoba (n=19) 11% 5% 84%<br />

New Brunswick (n=19) 16% 0 84%<br />

Newfoundland and Labrador (n=5) 20% 0 80%<br />

Nova Scotia (n=21) 19% 0 81%<br />

Ontario (n=39) 8% 0 92%<br />

Prince Edward Island (n=10) 3% 1% 6%<br />

Quebec (n=42) 21% 7% 71%<br />

Saskatchewan (n=21) 10% 10% 81%<br />

Source: Allied and Associated Trades 2011 CTHRC <strong>Survey</strong> of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Trucking</strong> Sector & 2012 CTHRC<br />

<strong>Survey</strong> of <strong>the</strong> Allied and Associated Trades QA2 and QA5; N=231<br />

28 <strong>Beyond</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Wheel</strong>


3: Workforce Profile<br />

A profile of employees from companies in <strong>the</strong> allied and associated trades that participated in <strong>the</strong> survey is contained in this<br />

section.<br />

3.1 Employment in Key Occupations<br />

Truck/transport mechanics accounted for almost two-thirds (60%) of employees in <strong>the</strong> allied and associated trades.<br />

The remaining employees were split between transport trailer technicians (23%) and parts technicians (17%) (Table 3).<br />

Table A3: Employees by Occupation/Group<br />

Occupation<br />

Allied and Associated Trades Occupations<br />

Average #<br />

Employees per<br />

Occupation per<br />

Company<br />

Total Employees<br />

per Occupation<br />

% of Total Allied<br />

and Associated<br />

Workforce<br />

Truck/Transport Mechanic 10 2195 60%<br />

Transport Trailer Technician 4 827 23%<br />

Parts Technician (Parts Person) 3 627 17%<br />

Source: Allied and Associated Trades 2011 CTHRC <strong>Survey</strong> of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Trucking</strong> Sector & 2012 CTHRC <strong>Survey</strong> of <strong>the</strong> Allied and Associated Trades QB2; n=3,649 .<br />

Total number of companies N=231<br />

Based on <strong>the</strong> three occupations of interest, survey results indicate that <strong>the</strong> majority of companies (74%) in <strong>the</strong> allied and<br />

associated trades employed apprentices. As presented in Table 4, <strong>the</strong> companies in <strong>the</strong> survey employed 716 apprentices.<br />

The most common type of apprenticeship was for truck/transport mechanics, which accounted for 84% of <strong>the</strong> total<br />

apprentice employment in <strong>the</strong> industry.<br />

Table A4: Apprentice Employment<br />

Occupation<br />

% of Companies<br />

that Employ<br />

Apprentices<br />

Total Apprentices<br />

Employed<br />

% of Apprentices<br />

Employed<br />

Average Employed<br />

per Firm<br />

Truck/Transport Mechanic 59% 601 84% 4<br />

Transport Trailer Technician 7% 58 8%


3.2 Employee Demographics<br />

The survey collected data to explore <strong>the</strong> age and gender profile of employees from <strong>the</strong> allied and associated trades sector.<br />

Given that <strong>the</strong> trucking industry is male-dominated, it is not surprising to find that <strong>the</strong> proportion of female workers in <strong>the</strong><br />

allied and associated trades was low at 5% (Table 5). There was some variation in female employment among <strong>the</strong> three<br />

allied and associated trades occupations examined. Females accounted for almost one quarter of all parts technicians<br />

(21%), however <strong>the</strong>y accounted for only 2% of transport trailer technicians, and less than 1% of truck/transport mechanics.<br />

Table AA5: Women in <strong>the</strong> Workforce by Occupation<br />

Occupation Total Employees # Women<br />

% Share of Female<br />

Workforce<br />

Truck/transport mechanic 2195 19


Table A7: Employee Age Profile by Occupation<br />

Occupation<br />

Total Employees<br />

30 years and<br />

under<br />

31 to 44 years 45 to 54 years<br />

55 years and<br />

over<br />

Truck/transport mechanic 2177 29% 38% 22% 11%<br />

Transport trailer technician 315 27% 43% 18% 12%<br />

Parts technician (parts person) 685 24% 41% 23% 13%<br />

Total 3177 28% 39 % 22% 11%<br />

Source: Allied and Associated Trades 2011 CTHRC <strong>Survey</strong> of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Trucking</strong> Sector & 2012 CTHRC <strong>Survey</strong> of <strong>the</strong> Allied and Associated Trades QC3; Some respondents were<br />

unable to complete this section of <strong>the</strong> survey <strong>the</strong>refore <strong>the</strong> total number of employees is lower than <strong>the</strong> total number of employees covered in o<strong>the</strong>r sections of <strong>the</strong> survey.<br />

For all three sectors almost two-thirds of <strong>the</strong>ir workforce was between <strong>the</strong> ages of 31-54 (Trailer Sales, Services and Leasing<br />

60%, Truck and Trailer Manufacturer 65%, Truck Sales, Service and Leasing 62%) (Table 8). While both <strong>the</strong> trailer sales,<br />

services and leasing, and <strong>the</strong> truck and trailer manufacturer sectors had a similar proportion of employees younger than 44<br />

years (70%, 74%) and older than 45 years (30%, 26%), <strong>the</strong> truck and trailer manufacturing sector had fewer employees<br />

under <strong>the</strong> age of 44 years (62%) and more employees over <strong>the</strong> age of 45 years (38%).<br />

Table A8: Employee Age Profile by Employer Sector<br />

Employer Sector 30 years and under 31 to 44 years 45 to 54 years 55 years and over<br />

Trailer Sales, Services and Leasing 31% 39% 21% 9%<br />

Truck and Trailer Manufacturer 27% 47% 18% 8%<br />

Truck Sales, Service and Leasing 23% 39% 23% 15%<br />

Source: Allied and Associated Trades 2011 CTHRC <strong>Survey</strong> of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Trucking</strong> Sector & 2012 CTHRC<br />

<strong>Survey</strong> of <strong>the</strong> Allied and Associated Trades QA2 and QC3<br />

N=3148*<br />

*The total N does not include employees in occupations outside allied and associated trades (E.g. o<strong>the</strong>r employer sector). Therefore <strong>the</strong> N used to calculate <strong>the</strong> above table is<br />

lower than <strong>the</strong> total employees (N= 3,649) previously reported.<br />

<strong>Beyond</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Wheel</strong><br />

31


4: Industry Demand<br />

This section examines industry demand for employees, based on <strong>the</strong> responses provided by <strong>the</strong> companies represented in<br />

<strong>the</strong> Allied and Associated Trades <strong>Survey</strong>. The following issues are examined:<br />

••<br />

Current vacancies;<br />

••<br />

Employee turnover/retention; and<br />

••<br />

Recruitment.<br />

4.1 Current Vacancies<br />

<strong>Survey</strong> respondents were asked to provide <strong>the</strong> current number of unfilled positions in each of <strong>the</strong> three occupation groups<br />

covered by <strong>the</strong> survey. Almost two-thirds (64%) of <strong>the</strong> companies surveyed reported at least one unfilled position in an<br />

allied and associated trades occupation within <strong>the</strong>ir company; <strong>the</strong>re was a total of 359 unfilled positions among all<br />

employers (Table 9).<br />

The estimated vacancy rate was highest for <strong>the</strong> transport trailer technician occupation, where vacancies represented<br />

approximately 10% of all positions. The estimate vacancy rates for both truck/transport mechanics (9%) and parts<br />

technicians (7%) were below that of transport trailer technicians. 2<br />

Table A9: Unfilled Positions by Occupation<br />

Type of Occupation # Unfilled Positions Vacancy Rate<br />

Truck/Transport Mechanic 218 9%<br />

Transport Trailer Technician 96 10%<br />

Parts Technicians (Parts Person) 45 7%<br />

Total 359 9%<br />

Source: Allied and Associated Trades 2011 CTHRC <strong>Survey</strong> of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Trucking</strong> Sector & 2012 CTHRC<br />

<strong>Survey</strong> of <strong>the</strong> Allied and Associated Trades QB2<br />

When examining <strong>the</strong> vacancy rate by province (10), it is apparent that <strong>the</strong> estimated vacancy rate was highest across all<br />

three occupations in Newfoundland and Labrador (Truck/Transport Mechanic 30%, Transport Trailer Technician 56%, Parts<br />

Technicians 20%) and Manitoba (Truck/Transport Mechanic 20%, Transport Trailer Technician 52%, Parts Technician 15%).<br />

The lowest estimate vacancy rate for transport trailer technicians occurred in New Brunswick (6%), for transport trailer<br />

technicians in Alberta (2%) and Ontario (2%), and for parts technicians in British Columbia (2%).<br />

2 Vacancy Rate was calculated as #of vacant positions/ (# of vacant positions + # of filled positions)<br />

32 <strong>Beyond</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Wheel</strong>


Table A10: Vacancy Rate by Province –Allied and Associated Trades<br />

Region<br />

Truck/Transport Mechanic<br />

Transport Trailer<br />

Technician<br />

Parts Technician/Parts<br />

Person<br />

Alberta 53 11% 1 2% 12 9%<br />

British Columbia 14 8% 3 18% 1 2%<br />

Manitoba 26 20% 12 52% 5 15%<br />

New Brunswick 7 6% 2 14% 1 3%<br />

Newfoundland and Labrador 9 30% 5 56% 2 20%<br />

Nova Scotia 16 11% 4 15% 3 5%<br />

Ontario 19 10% 1 2% 4 10%<br />

Prince Edward Island 8 20% 1 50% 1 6%<br />

Quebec 31 12% 64 13% 6 6%<br />

Saskatchewan 35 15% 3 17% 10 12%<br />

Total 218 9% 96 10% 45 7%<br />

Source: Allied and Associated Trades 2011 CTHRC <strong>Survey</strong> of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Trucking</strong> Sector & 2012 CTHRC <strong>Survey</strong> of <strong>the</strong> Allied and Associated Trades QA5 and QB2<br />

Note: Provincial data should be interpreted with caution due to <strong>the</strong> small sample sizes.<br />

4.2 Retention<br />

Employee retention was explored by estimating <strong>the</strong> turnover rate from information provided in <strong>the</strong> survey about employee<br />

leaving patterns, specifically those who leave <strong>the</strong> company within 12 months of employment and those who leave after<br />

12 months of employment. The following calculation was used to determine <strong>the</strong> average turnover rate:<br />

Average turnover rate =<br />

Sum of job separations<br />

Sum of total employees 3<br />

The estimated turnover rate for employees who had worked for an allied and associated trades company for less than<br />

12 months was 11%, on average. For those employed with an allied and associated trades company for more than<br />

12 months, <strong>the</strong> turnover rate decreased slightly to 7%.<br />

4.3 Recruitment<br />

<strong>Survey</strong> respondents were asked to rate <strong>the</strong> degree of difficulty for <strong>the</strong>ir company in filling vacancies in <strong>the</strong> three allied and<br />

associated trades related occupations. Results suggested that for all three allied and associated trades’ occupations<br />

recruitment is difficult (Figure 1). Close to three-quarters of allied and associated trade companies reported that it is difficult/<br />

very difficult to fill vacancies in truck/transport mechanic (82%) and in transport trailer technician (74%). More than half<br />

(52%) had difficulty in filling positions for parts technicians. The difficulty in recruiting for <strong>the</strong>se positions could be one<br />

reason for <strong>the</strong> high rate (64%) of allied and associated trade companies that reported at least one unfilled position (Section<br />

4.1). This suggests that <strong>the</strong>re is a current shortage of workers in allied and associated trade occupations, due to <strong>the</strong> difficulty<br />

in filling <strong>the</strong>se positions.<br />

3 Leavers and terminations<br />

<strong>Beyond</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Wheel</strong><br />

33


Figure A1: Degree of Difficulty Filling Positions by Occupation<br />

82%<br />

Truck/Transport Mechanic<br />

5%<br />

13%<br />

74%<br />

Transport Trailer Technician<br />

8%<br />

18%<br />

52%<br />

Parts Technicians/Parts Person<br />

20%<br />

29%<br />

Difficult/Very Difficult Somewhat difficult Not at all difficult<br />

Source: Allied and Associated Trades 2011 CTHRC <strong>Survey</strong> of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Trucking</strong> Sector & 2012 CTHRC <strong>Survey</strong> of <strong>the</strong> Allied and Associated Trades QC2; total may not sum to exactly<br />

to100% due to rounding<br />

34 <strong>Beyond</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Wheel</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!