Beyond the Wheel - Survey Technical Report - Canadian Trucking ...
Beyond the Wheel - Survey Technical Report - Canadian Trucking ...
Beyond the Wheel - Survey Technical Report - Canadian Trucking ...
Transform your PDFs into Flipbooks and boost your revenue!
Leverage SEO-optimized Flipbooks, powerful backlinks, and multimedia content to professionally showcase your products and significantly increase your reach.
BEYOND THE WHEEL<br />
<strong>Survey</strong> <strong>Technical</strong> <strong>Report</strong> - 2012<br />
Labour Market Information Study<br />
Our mission: to assist <strong>the</strong> <strong>Canadian</strong> trucking industry to<br />
recruit, train and retain <strong>the</strong> human resources needed<br />
to meet current and long-term requirements.<br />
This project is funded by <strong>the</strong> Government<br />
of Canada’s Sector Council Program.
Acknowledgements<br />
The <strong>Canadian</strong> <strong>Trucking</strong> Human Resources Council (CTHRC) wishes to express sincere appreciation for <strong>the</strong> contribution of representatives<br />
from <strong>the</strong> carriers and fleets, professional associations, labour organizations, and independent professionals who contributed directly or<br />
indirectly to this publication. The commitment to excellence of <strong>the</strong> many participants has made this report possible. Special acknowledgement<br />
is extended to <strong>the</strong> Labour Market Information – 4 Project Advisory Committee who oversaw <strong>the</strong> project and CTHRC’s Provincial Labour<br />
Market Information Networks who provided <strong>the</strong>ir technical expertise on this project.<br />
Contact Information<br />
<strong>Canadian</strong> <strong>Trucking</strong> Human Resources Council<br />
203–720 Belfast Road<br />
Ottawa, ON K1G 0Z5<br />
Tel.: 613-244-4800 Fax: 613-244-4535<br />
E-mail: info@cthrc.com<br />
Internet: www.cthrc.com<br />
Copyright © 2012 <strong>Canadian</strong> <strong>Trucking</strong> Human Resources Council (CTHRC)<br />
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any<br />
means, including electronic, photocopying, recording or o<strong>the</strong>rwise, without prior written permission from <strong>the</strong> <strong>Canadian</strong> <strong>Trucking</strong> Human<br />
Resources Council.<br />
Alternative Formats<br />
This publication is available in electronic format on <strong>the</strong> <strong>Canadian</strong> <strong>Trucking</strong> Human Resources Council website at www.cthrc.com.<br />
Disclaimer<br />
The material in this report reflects <strong>the</strong> CTHRC’s best judgment in light of <strong>the</strong> information available to it at <strong>the</strong> time of preparation. Any use<br />
that a third party makes of this report, or any reliance on or decisions to be made based on it, are <strong>the</strong> responsibility of such third parties.<br />
The CTHRC accepts no responsibility for damages, if any, suffered by any third party as a result of decisions made or actions based on this<br />
report. Information has been obtained by <strong>the</strong> CTHRC from sources believed to be reliable. However, because of <strong>the</strong> possibility of human<br />
or mechanical error by our sources, <strong>the</strong> CTHRC does not guarantee <strong>the</strong> accuracy, adequacy or completeness of any of <strong>the</strong> information.<br />
The author, publisher and contributors shall not be held liable in any degree for any loss or injury by an omission, error, misprint or ambiguity.<br />
If you have any questions regarding <strong>the</strong> content of this publication, <strong>the</strong> CTHRC staff is available to provide information and assistance.<br />
Printed in Canada.
Table of Contents<br />
1. Introduction. ..................................................................................................................................................... 1<br />
2. <strong>Survey</strong> Methodology. .................................................................................................................................. 2<br />
2.1. Development of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Survey</strong> Instrument. ..................................................................................................... 2<br />
2.2 Sample Development ................................................................................................................................... 2<br />
2.2.1 <strong>Survey</strong> Administration ......................................................................................................................... 3<br />
2.3 <strong>Survey</strong> Representation and Coverage of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Trucking</strong> Sector .................................................................. 4<br />
3. <strong>Trucking</strong> Company Characteristics. ................................................................................................... 6<br />
3.1 Type of Operator ............................................................................................................................................ 6<br />
3.2 Primary Sector of Operation . ........................................................................................................................ 7<br />
3.3 Distribution of Fleets ..................................................................................................................................... 8<br />
3.4 Fleet Size . ......................................................................................................................................................10<br />
3.5 Hauling Type . ................................................................................................................................................11<br />
4. Workforce Profile. .......................................................................................................................................14<br />
4.1 Total Employees ..........................................................................................................................................14<br />
4.2 Employment in Key Occupations ..............................................................................................................16<br />
4.3 Employee Demographics ..........................................................................................................................17<br />
5. Industry Demand. ........................................................................................................................................20<br />
5.1 Current Vacancies .......................................................................................................................................20<br />
5.2 Retention .....................................................................................................................................................21<br />
5.3 Future Workforce ........................................................................................................................................21<br />
5.4 Recruitment ..................................................................................................................................................22<br />
APPENDIX A: . ..........................................................................................................................................................23<br />
Allied & Associated Trades <strong>Survey</strong> <strong>Technical</strong> <strong>Report</strong>. .........................................................................................23
1. Introduction<br />
The <strong>Canadian</strong> <strong>Trucking</strong> Human Resources Council (CTHRC) has been in operation since January 1994. It is a<br />
national organization governed by a Board of Directors that represents a variety of interests within <strong>the</strong> trucking industry. 1<br />
The CTHRC was formed during a period of deregulation in <strong>the</strong> trucking industry and is committed to assisting <strong>the</strong> <strong>Canadian</strong><br />
trucking industry with <strong>the</strong>ir human resource needs and responding with research, training and advice.<br />
The goal of this national survey is to augment <strong>the</strong> data in <strong>the</strong> CTHRC’s Labour Information Highway - Demand Data Tool by<br />
filling in <strong>the</strong> data gaps. A survey of employers was completed with companies in <strong>the</strong> trucking sector and companies that<br />
hire employees in Allied and Associated trades. The data collected through <strong>the</strong> survey will be used to:<br />
••<br />
provide sub-sector data (i.e., owner-operators, private, for-hire, large carriers, small carriers and metros (trucking hubs));<br />
••<br />
provide information about labour force characteristics;<br />
••<br />
update national, provincial and sub-sector ratios in <strong>the</strong> LMI Demand Forecasting Model, and<br />
••<br />
develop an HR Benchmarking Tool for carriers enabling <strong>the</strong>m to enter <strong>the</strong>ir own company HR statistics and develop<br />
forecasts using <strong>the</strong> variables and relationships developed in <strong>the</strong> LMI Demand Forecasting Model.<br />
The results of <strong>the</strong> survey of trucking companies are presented in this report, with <strong>the</strong> results of Allied and Associated Trades<br />
survey contained in Appendix A. The remainder of this report is organized as follows:<br />
Section 2: <strong>Survey</strong> Methodology<br />
Section 3: <strong>Trucking</strong> Company Characteristics<br />
Section 4: Workforce Profile<br />
Section 5: Industry Demand<br />
1 http://www.cthrc.com/en/content/board-directors<br />
<strong>Beyond</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Wheel</strong><br />
1
2. <strong>Survey</strong> Methodology<br />
Several activities were completed for <strong>the</strong> survey component of <strong>the</strong> project. Each activity is described in <strong>the</strong> remainder of<br />
this section.<br />
2.1 Development of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Survey</strong> Instrument<br />
The CTHRC <strong>Survey</strong> of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Trucking</strong> Sector was designed to collect information about <strong>the</strong> characteristics of <strong>the</strong> trucking sector<br />
and its workforce. As part of <strong>the</strong> survey design, information on <strong>the</strong> nine key occupations in <strong>the</strong> trucking industry (separating<br />
Truck Drivers by class and type) were included. These occupations included:<br />
••<br />
Company Truck Driver (Class 1/AZ);<br />
••<br />
Company Truck Driver (Class 3/D);<br />
••<br />
Owner/Operator Truck Driver (Class 1/AZ or 3/D);<br />
••<br />
Truck/Transport Mechanic (heavy duty);<br />
••<br />
Transport Trailer Technician (heavy duty);<br />
••<br />
Parts Technician (Parts Person);<br />
••<br />
Shunt Drivers (Class 1/AZ or 3D);<br />
••<br />
Cargo Worker;<br />
••<br />
Dispatcher;<br />
••<br />
Freight Claims/Safety & Loss Prevention Specialist, and<br />
••<br />
Foreman/Supervisor/Manager.<br />
The survey consisted of four sections:<br />
••<br />
Your Organization (i.e., location, number of branches, number of power units 2 , type of operator, sector of operation,<br />
and type of hauling);<br />
••<br />
Your Workforce (i.e., number of employees in each occupation and use of human resource personnel);<br />
••<br />
Retention of Workforce (i.e., staff turnover, difficulty filling occupations, and age profile of current employees), and<br />
••<br />
Future Workforce (i.e., expected growth).<br />
To ensure <strong>the</strong> questionnaire was appropriate for employers in <strong>the</strong> trucking sector and Allied and Associated trades, it was<br />
reviewed and pilot tested through a validation process. The validation process involved meetings with members of CTHRC’s<br />
Provincial Labour Market Information Networks and members from <strong>the</strong> Allied and Associated trades. Adjustments were<br />
made to <strong>the</strong> survey instrument as a result of <strong>the</strong> validation process, and <strong>the</strong> questionnaire was fur<strong>the</strong>r tested through<br />
rigorous in-house protocols to ensure accurate CallWeb-CATI programming of <strong>the</strong> survey instrument. The questionnaire was<br />
made available in both French and English.<br />
2.2 Sample Development<br />
The majority of employers in <strong>the</strong> trucking sector are for-hire companies 3 and can be identified by North American Industry<br />
Classification System (NAICS) 484 (Truck Transportation). However, <strong>the</strong>re is also significant employment in industries for<br />
which truck transportation is not <strong>the</strong> primary line of business (i.e., private carriers 4 ). Examples include fleets operated by<br />
retail establishments for <strong>the</strong> transportation needs of <strong>the</strong>ir organization (e.g., Tim Hortons, Safeway, <strong>Canadian</strong> Tire,<br />
McDonalds, etc.) as well as o<strong>the</strong>r service-providing and goods-manufacturing sectors.<br />
To ensure a comprehensive sample frame was developed for <strong>the</strong> study, R.A. Malatest & Associates Ltd. included companies<br />
from <strong>the</strong> CTHRC member database supplemented with a large sample of employers in <strong>the</strong> trucking and private sectors<br />
from <strong>the</strong> InfoCanada database. All large and medium-sized trucking firms were included in <strong>the</strong> survey sample and<br />
contacted to participate to help maximize coverage of <strong>the</strong> workforce (i.e., a census approach). A sample of small/micro<br />
companies (with between 0 and 99 employees) was randomly selected within each province/territory with a goal of<br />
obtaining a geographic representation of <strong>the</strong> industry proportional to <strong>the</strong> number of companies in each region.<br />
2 The term power unit refers to <strong>the</strong> truck tractor that is <strong>the</strong> control and pulling vehicle for <strong>the</strong> trailer.<br />
3 For hire carriers are those companies whose purpose is to transport freight for remuneration to destinations in domestic or international markets.<br />
4 Private carriers consist of those companies whose principle occupation is not trucking, but has its own fleet of vehicles for transporting its own freight.<br />
2 <strong>Beyond</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Wheel</strong>
2.2.1 <strong>Survey</strong> Administration<br />
The companies included in <strong>the</strong> sample frame had contact information. When an e-mail address was available, <strong>the</strong> initial<br />
approach to all companies was delivery of an e-mail from CTHRC highlighting <strong>the</strong> value of <strong>the</strong> survey to <strong>the</strong> industry and<br />
inviting participation. This introductory e-mail was followed with an e-mail containing an electronic link to an online survey<br />
form. Companies were sent two e-mail reminders.<br />
To supplement <strong>the</strong> e-mail invitation, all known medium-sized and large companies in <strong>the</strong> trucking sector were mailed a<br />
paper copy of <strong>the</strong> questionnaire to complete and return via a business reply envelope (provided to respondents) or fax.<br />
The consultant monitored completions and used telephone follow-up when possible to maximize <strong>the</strong> regional<br />
representation of <strong>the</strong> completed surveys.<br />
When an e-mail address was not available but a fax or telephone number was available, companies were faxed an<br />
invitation to complete <strong>the</strong> questionnaire and contacted by telephone. The study was explained, and <strong>the</strong>y were offered<br />
<strong>the</strong> option of completion by telephone or by online survey. Hard-copy questionnaires was also an option to companies<br />
that requested <strong>the</strong>m.<br />
Full survey administration by R.A. Malatest & Associates Ltd. commenced on October 3, 2011, and continued until<br />
November 14, 2011. To boost <strong>the</strong> representation of Allied and Associated Trades in <strong>the</strong> survey results, Newcom<br />
Business Media Inc. 5 provided a link to its members to complete <strong>the</strong> survey online. In addition, <strong>the</strong> consultant<br />
monitored completions and used telephone follow-up when possible to maximize <strong>the</strong> regional representation of <strong>the</strong><br />
completed surveys.<br />
A total of 1,078 surveys were completed through multiple modes (Table 1).<br />
The majority of <strong>the</strong> survey respondents were companies that belonged to <strong>the</strong> trucking sector; 98% of total survey<br />
respondents were trucking companies (n=1,057) and 2% (n=21) were companies in <strong>the</strong> Allied and Associated<br />
Trades sectors.<br />
Table 1: Mode of <strong>Survey</strong> Completion<br />
Malatest<br />
Mode of Completion<br />
# Completions<br />
Mail/Fax 9<br />
Online 69<br />
Telephone 941<br />
Malatest Subtotal 1,019<br />
NewCom<br />
On-line 38<br />
NewCom Subtotal 38<br />
Total Carriers 1,057<br />
Allied and Associated 21<br />
Total Respondents 1,078<br />
5 NewCom Business Media Inc. is one of Canada’s largest publishers of business to business magazines.<br />
<strong>Beyond</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Wheel</strong><br />
3
2.3 <strong>Survey</strong> Representation and Coverage of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Trucking</strong> Sector<br />
The geographic distribution of survey completions was similar to <strong>the</strong> distribution in <strong>the</strong> database of identified companies,<br />
with a slightly higher representation of firms in Manitoba (Table 2).<br />
Table 2: Geographical Distribution of <strong>Trucking</strong> Companies (Head Office)<br />
Location<br />
NAICS 484 Companies<br />
(2010)<br />
CTHRC <strong>Survey</strong> - <strong>Trucking</strong> Only<br />
Count Percent Count Percent<br />
Alberta 5,313 17% 174 16%<br />
British Columbia 3,720 12% 121 11%<br />
Manitoba 1,056 3% 130 12%<br />
New Brunswick 1,002 3% 33 3%<br />
Newfoundland and Labrador 293 1% 14 1%<br />
Northwest Territories 25
Large and medium-sized companies are well represented in <strong>the</strong> final survey sample, as intended (Table 4). With <strong>the</strong> 2010<br />
Industry Canada company list as <strong>the</strong> standard of comparison, <strong>the</strong> survey respondent sample included all (100%) large<br />
trucking companies and 62% of medium-sized companies. In contrast, <strong>the</strong> final respondent sample contains only 3% of<br />
<strong>the</strong> total number of small companies, as a result of under-sampling from <strong>the</strong> owner-operator segment of <strong>the</strong> industry.<br />
Table 4: Coverage of Employers by Size (# Employees)<br />
Company Size<br />
(Employees)<br />
Companies 2010 1 CTHRC <strong>Survey</strong> -<br />
<strong>Trucking</strong> Companies<br />
Count (n=30,733) Count (n=1,057) Percent Coverage<br />
Small (0 – 99) 30,502 903 3%<br />
Medium (100 – 499) 210 130 62%<br />
Large (500+) 21 24 >100%<br />
1 Source: Industry Canada 2010 – all employers in NAICS 484<br />
The CTHRC survey of <strong>the</strong> trucking sector captured information about 106,535 employees, including 56,003 truck drivers,<br />
collected from 1,057 trucking firms. The survey captured information for approximately 20% of all truck drivers in <strong>the</strong> sector.<br />
Given <strong>the</strong> high coverage of large (>100%) and medium-sized (62%) trucking companies in <strong>the</strong> final survey sample, <strong>the</strong><br />
survey results present a fairly accurate overview of companies in <strong>the</strong> trucking sector with 100 or more employees. 6<br />
However, caution should be used when viewing and interpreting <strong>the</strong> results for smaller firms. 7<br />
6 Based on <strong>the</strong> 2006 Census data, <strong>the</strong>re are a total of 304,895 truck drivers working in all sectors combined.<br />
7 The sample error for <strong>the</strong> medium-sized companies is ±5.1% (at <strong>the</strong> 95% CI), a level considered acceptable for this type of research.<br />
<strong>Beyond</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Wheel</strong><br />
5
3. <strong>Trucking</strong> Company Characteristics<br />
The survey captured specific characteristics of companies in <strong>the</strong> trucking sector. These characteristics are presented in this<br />
section.<br />
3.1 Type of Operator<br />
The majority (67%) of employers in <strong>the</strong> trucking sector are for-hire operators (Table 5). Almost one-quarter (23%) of <strong>the</strong><br />
companies are private operators. 8<br />
Table 5: Type of Operator<br />
Type of Operator Number of Companies % of Companies<br />
For Hire Operator 708 67%<br />
Private Operator 245 23%<br />
Owner Operator 1 104 10%<br />
Total 1,057 100%<br />
Source: 2011 CTHRC <strong>Survey</strong> of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Trucking</strong> Sector QA2<br />
1 Operators who haul trailers or o<strong>the</strong>r equipment using <strong>the</strong>ir own trucks (ei<strong>the</strong>r leased or owned)<br />
As shown in Table 6, <strong>the</strong> majority of companies in all provinces are for-hire operators, with <strong>the</strong> highest saturation occurring<br />
in Quebec (87%) and Saskatchewan (76%). The percentage of private carriers is similar in all provinces (24%-33%)<br />
with <strong>the</strong> exception of Saskatchewan (12%) and Quebec (9%). The highest percentage of owner-operators is in<br />
Manitoba (17%).<br />
Table 6: Type of Operator by Region<br />
Region<br />
Number of Companies<br />
For Hire Private Owner Operator<br />
British Columbia (n=121) 66% 25% 9%<br />
Alberta (n=175) 58% 29% 13%<br />
Saskatchewan (n=41) 76% 12% 12%<br />
Manitoba (n=130) 50% 33% 17%<br />
Ontario (n=299) 68% 24% 8%<br />
Quebec (n=206) 87% 9% 4%<br />
Atlantic Canada (n=78) 59% 29% 12%<br />
International (n=6) 33% 50% 17%<br />
Source: 2011 CTHRC <strong>Survey</strong> of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Trucking</strong> Sector QA2 and QA5; n=1,057. Rows do not sum to 100% as <strong>the</strong> “o<strong>the</strong>r” category is excluded from <strong>the</strong> table<br />
8 Companies that maintain <strong>the</strong>ir own fleets of vehicles primarily for <strong>the</strong> transportation needs of <strong>the</strong>ir organization only.<br />
6 <strong>Beyond</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Wheel</strong>
3.2 Primary Sector of Operation<br />
Of all trucking companies, most (51%) belong to <strong>the</strong> general freight/transportation and warehousing sector (Table 7).<br />
Approximately one-third (34%) identify <strong>the</strong> general freight sector as <strong>the</strong> primary hauling sector 9 for which <strong>the</strong>y move goods.<br />
More than one-quarter of trucking companies haul freight for <strong>the</strong> construction sector (13%) or <strong>the</strong> resource sector (13%).<br />
For <strong>the</strong> most part, <strong>the</strong> primary hauling sector aligns with <strong>the</strong> sector of operation (i.e., companies haul within <strong>the</strong>ir sector of<br />
operation).<br />
Table 7: Companies by Sector of Operation and Primary and Secondary Haul Sectors<br />
Sector<br />
Primary Sector of<br />
Operation (n=1,057)<br />
Primary Hauling Sector*<br />
(n=1,006)<br />
Secondary Hauling Sector**<br />
(n=1,057)<br />
General Freight 51% 34% 11%<br />
Construction 9% 13% 8%<br />
Resource Sector 9% 13% 7%<br />
Haulers of Commodities 8% 10% 5%<br />
Agriculture 6% 8% 5%<br />
Wholesale/Retail Trade 4% 8% 4%<br />
Manufacturing 3% 6% 5%<br />
Utilities 2% 2% 2%<br />
O<strong>the</strong>r 10% 6% 2%<br />
Total 100% 100% na<br />
Source: 2011 CTHRC <strong>Survey</strong> of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Trucking</strong> Sector QA3; n=1,057<br />
*Excludes Not applicable (n=51)<br />
**53% of <strong>the</strong> sample did not identify a secondary hauling sector<br />
As can be seen in Table 8, 41% of owner operators and 59% of for-hire operators haul for <strong>the</strong> general freight sector<br />
compared to 34% of private carriers. Owner operators (20%) are slightly more likely than for-hire (5%) or private carriers<br />
(17%) to haul for <strong>the</strong> construction sector. Private carriers (8%) are slightly more likely to haul for <strong>the</strong> wholesale/retail trade<br />
sector than for-hire (2%) or owner operators (6%).<br />
Table 8: Sector of Operation by Operator Type<br />
Sector For Hire Operator Private Carrier Owner Operator<br />
General Freight 59% 34% 41%<br />
Construction 5% 17% 20%<br />
Resource Sector 8% 10% 10%<br />
Haulers of Commodities 8% 7% 8%<br />
Agriculture 5% 7% 8%<br />
Wholesale/Retail Trade 2% 8% 6%<br />
Manufacturing 2% 4% 3%<br />
Utilities 2% 2% 0%<br />
O<strong>the</strong>r 10% 10% 5%<br />
Source: 2011 CTHRC <strong>Survey</strong> of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Trucking</strong> Sector QA2 and QA3<br />
9 Primary hauling sector refers to <strong>the</strong> sector from which <strong>the</strong> majority of <strong>the</strong> firm’s revenue from hauling is generated. The secondary haul sector generates <strong>the</strong> next highest<br />
amount of revenue.<br />
<strong>Beyond</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Wheel</strong><br />
7
3.3 Distribution of Fleets<br />
<strong>Survey</strong> respondents were asked to identify <strong>the</strong> number of power units located in each province/territory where <strong>the</strong>y<br />
operated and in selected provincial trucking hubs. As presented in Table 9, companies in Ontario account for almost<br />
one-third (30%) of all power units, followed by Alberta (17%) and Quebec (17%). All o<strong>the</strong>r provinces/territories account<br />
for 11% or fewer of total power units.<br />
Table 9: Distribution of Companies with Power Units by Province<br />
Province # Power Units % Power Units<br />
British Columbia 3,481 11%<br />
Alberta 5,457 17%<br />
Saskatchewan 1,948 6%<br />
Manitoba 2,661 8%<br />
Ontario 9,424 30%<br />
Quebec 5,232 17%<br />
New Brunswick 928 3%<br />
Newfoundland and Labrador 504 2%<br />
Nova Scotia 1,292 4%<br />
Prince Edward Island 555 2%<br />
Territories 12 < 1%<br />
Total 31,494 100%<br />
Source: 2011 CTHRC <strong>Survey</strong> of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Trucking</strong> Sector QA8<br />
Company location and fleet size were identified for provincial trucking hubs, as well. As Table 10 shows, <strong>the</strong>re is wide<br />
variation in <strong>the</strong> extent to which offices and fleets are located in <strong>the</strong>se hubs. For example, Winnipeg, Manitoba, accounts for<br />
a large proportion of offices (44%) and power units (54%) in <strong>the</strong> province. In British Columbia, a large proportion of <strong>the</strong><br />
offices (40%) and power units (47%) are located in <strong>the</strong> Lower Mainland area (which includes several provincial trucking<br />
hubs). In contrast, Toronto, Ontario, accounts for 20% of offices and 32% of power units in <strong>the</strong> province.<br />
8 <strong>Beyond</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Wheel</strong>
Table 10: Distribution of Companies with Power Units by Provincial <strong>Trucking</strong> Hubs<br />
Metropolitan Area # Companies % Companies<br />
# Power Units in<br />
<strong>the</strong> Area<br />
% Power Units in<br />
<strong>the</strong> Province<br />
British Columbia - Lower Mainland 63 40% 1,620 47%<br />
Alberta - Calgary 56 22% 1,381 25%<br />
Alberta - Edmonton 73 28% 1,559 29%<br />
Saskatchewan - Saskatoon 27 36% 711 36%<br />
Saskatchewan - Regina 15 20% 244 13%<br />
Manitoba - Winnipeg 71 44% 1,424 54%<br />
Manitoba - Brandon 15 9% 54 2%<br />
Ontario - Toronto 65 20% 2,987 32%<br />
Quebec - Montreal 62 26% 1,617 31%<br />
Quebec - Quebec City 35 14% 577 11%<br />
New Brunswick - Moncton 9 21% 47 5%<br />
Newfoundland and Labrador - St John’s 14 70% 158 31%<br />
Nova Scotia - Halifax 10 31% 297 23%<br />
Prince Edward Island - Charlottetown 4 29% 58 10%<br />
Source: 2011 CTHRC <strong>Survey</strong> of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Trucking</strong> Sector QA8<br />
Companies in provincial trucking hubs are displayed according to <strong>the</strong>ir geographical distribution in Figure 1.<br />
Figure 1: Geographical Distribution of <strong>Trucking</strong> Companies across Provincial <strong>Trucking</strong> Hubs<br />
Source: 2011 CTHRC <strong>Survey</strong> of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Trucking</strong> Sector QA8<br />
<strong>Beyond</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Wheel</strong><br />
9
3.4 Fleet Size<br />
Approximately seven out of 10 survey respondents (69%)<br />
operate fleets of 25 power units or fewer (Table 11). Only<br />
15% of respondents operate large fleets of more than 50<br />
power units. The average fleet size for all companies is 60<br />
power units.<br />
As summarized in Table 12, fleets located in Saskatchewan<br />
and Ontario are more likely to include more than 50 power<br />
units (24% and 19%, respectively) than fleets in o<strong>the</strong>r<br />
provinces (10% to 15%). Small fleets predominate in<br />
Manitoba, where 58% of respondents operate fewer than<br />
10 power units.<br />
Table 12: Fleet Size by Region<br />
Table 11: <strong>Trucking</strong> Companies by Fleet Size<br />
(# Power Units)<br />
Number of Power<br />
Units<br />
Number of Companies %<br />
Less than 10 458 43%<br />
10 to 25 280 26%<br />
26 to 50 156 15%<br />
51 to100 89 8%<br />
More than 100 72 7%<br />
No Data 2 100<br />
British Columbia (n=120) 48% 25% 12% 6% 9%<br />
Alberta (n=174) 41% 25% 20% 8% 6%<br />
Saskatchewan (n=41) 29% 29% 17% 7% 17%<br />
Manitoba (n=130) 58% 23% 9% 5% 5%<br />
Ontario (n=299) 33% 31% 16% 12% 7%<br />
Quebec (n=206) 50% 24% 14% 8% 4%<br />
Atlantic Canada (n=78) 46% 27% 14% 6% 6%<br />
Territories (n=1) 100% 0% 0% 0% 0%<br />
Source: 2011 CTHRC <strong>Survey</strong> of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Trucking</strong> Sector QA7 and region by QA5<br />
On average, companies in Atlantic Canada operate<br />
184 power units apiece, <strong>the</strong> highest average number of<br />
power units per company in <strong>the</strong> country. Saskatchewan<br />
companies operate an average of 43 power units.<br />
Companies in Ontario operate an average of 33 power<br />
units, while <strong>the</strong> average number of power units per<br />
company in Canada is 30 (Table 13). It is important to<br />
note that <strong>the</strong> average number of power units is based on<br />
responses from a relatively higher number of mediumsized<br />
and large firms. Small firms and owner-operators<br />
were under-represented in <strong>the</strong> survey.<br />
Table 13: Average Number of Power Units per Company<br />
by Province<br />
Province<br />
Average # Power Units per<br />
Company<br />
British Columbia 25<br />
Alberta 25<br />
Saskatchewan 43<br />
Manitoba 24<br />
Ontario 33<br />
Quebec 24<br />
Atlantic Canada 184<br />
Territories 6<br />
Canada 30<br />
Source: 2011 CTHRC <strong>Survey</strong> of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Trucking</strong> Sector QA8<br />
10 <strong>Beyond</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Wheel</strong>
Comparing trucking hubs in <strong>the</strong> country (Table 14), companies located in Toronto operate <strong>the</strong> highest average number of<br />
power units (46 units per company). The average number of power units per company in most o<strong>the</strong>r provincial trucking<br />
hubs ranges from 20 to 30, with <strong>the</strong> exception of companies located in Charlottetown, PEI (15), Quebec City (16),<br />
Regina, SK (16), St. John’s (11), Brandon, MB (4) and Moncton, NB (5).<br />
Table 14: Average Number of Power Units for Companies in Selected Provincial <strong>Trucking</strong> Hubs<br />
Provincial <strong>Trucking</strong> Hubs<br />
British Columbia - Lower Mainland 26<br />
Alberta - Calgary 25<br />
Alberta - Edmonton 21<br />
Saskatchewan - Saskatoon 26<br />
Saskatchewan - Regina 16<br />
Manitoba - Winnipeg 20<br />
Manitoba - Brandon 4<br />
Ontario - Toronto 46<br />
Quebec - Montreal 26<br />
Quebec - Quebec City 16<br />
New Brunswick - Moncton 5<br />
Newfoundland and Labrador - St John’s 11<br />
Nova Scotia - Halifax 30<br />
Prince Edward Island - Charlottetown 15<br />
Average #<br />
Power Units per Company<br />
Source: 2011 CTHRC <strong>Survey</strong> of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Trucking</strong> Sector QA8<br />
3.5 Hauling Type<br />
Nearly two-thirds (62%) of trucking companies run short-haul 10 trips (Table 15). There is a fairly even split between<br />
companies that offer cross-border hauling to <strong>the</strong> U.S. (47%) and companies that haul domestically only (53%).<br />
Table 15: <strong>Survey</strong> Responses by Type of Hauling<br />
Type of Hauling # of Companies %<br />
Long Haul (more than 500km or more than one day) 393 37%<br />
Short Haul (less than 500km or less than one day 648 62%<br />
Cross Border Hauling (US) 486 47%<br />
Domestic Only 555 53%<br />
Total 1,041 100%<br />
Source: 2011 CTHRC <strong>Survey</strong> of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Trucking</strong> Sector QA4<br />
10 Less than 500km or less than one day.<br />
<strong>Beyond</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Wheel</strong><br />
11
As summarized in Table 16, private operators (25%) and owner-operators (24%) are similarly likely to do long-haul trips.<br />
For-hire operators are most likely to do cross-border hauling to <strong>the</strong> U.S. (33%). Owner-operators are least likely to do long<br />
haul trips (24%) or cross-border hauling (16%).<br />
Table 16: Type of Hauling by Operator Type<br />
Type of Company Long Haul Short Haul US Haul Domestic Haul<br />
For Hire Carrier 309 44% 386 56% 232 33% 463 67%<br />
Private Carrier 26 25% 77 75% 25 24% 78 76%<br />
Owner Operator 58 24% 185 76% 39 16% 204 84%<br />
Total 393 38% 648 62% 296 28% 745 72%<br />
Source: 2011 CTHRC <strong>Survey</strong> of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Trucking</strong> Sector QA2 and QA4<br />
Smaller fleets of 25 or fewer power units are less likely to do long-haul trips than companies with fleets of more than 25<br />
power units (Table 17). Of fleets with fewer than 25 power units, 34% do long-haul trips compared to 50% of companies<br />
with larger fleets. Among larger fleets with more than 25 power units, 38% haul across <strong>the</strong> U.S. border compared to 26%<br />
of fleets with fewer than 25 power units.<br />
Table 17: Type of Hauling by Fleet Size<br />
Fleet Size Long Haul Short Haul US Haul Domestic Haul<br />
Less than 10 (n=464) 132 29% 319 71% 98 22% 353 78%<br />
10 to 25 (n=290) 105 38% 169 62% 80 29% 194 71%<br />
26 to 50 (n=159) 77 50% 77 50% 57 37% 97 63%<br />
51 to100 (n=97) 45 51% 44 49% 33 37% 56 63%<br />
More than 100 (n=81) 34 48% 37 52% 28 39% 43 61%<br />
Total 393 38% 646 62% 296 28% 743 72%<br />
Source: 2011 CTHRC <strong>Survey</strong> of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Trucking</strong> Sector QA4 and QA7<br />
Companies in <strong>the</strong> general freight sector are more likely to do long-haul trips (49%) and cross-border hauling (39%) than<br />
companies in o<strong>the</strong>r sectors (Table 18). Companies in <strong>the</strong> construction sector are least likely to do long-haul trips (14%).<br />
Construction (7%) and resource sector (9%) companies are least likely to do cross-border hauling.<br />
12 <strong>Beyond</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Wheel</strong>
Table 18: Type of Hauling by Sector of Operation<br />
Sector Long Haul Short Haul Cross Border (US Haul) Domestic Haul<br />
General Freight (n=533) 260 49% 273 51% 206 39% 327 61%<br />
Wholesale/Retail Trade (n=40) 14 35% 26 65% 9 23% 31 78%<br />
Manufacturing (n=27) 6 22% 21 78% 8 30% 19 70%<br />
Resource Sector (n=88) 20 23% 68 77% 6 7% 82 93%<br />
Construction (n=95) 13 14% 82 86% 9 9% 86 91%<br />
Utilities (n=18) 5 28% 13 72% 2 11% 16 89%<br />
Agriculture (n=59) 18 31% 41 69% 11 19% 48 81%<br />
Haulers of Commodities<br />
(n=81)<br />
24 30% 57 70% 17 21% 64 79%<br />
O<strong>the</strong>r (n=100) 33 33% 67 67% 28 28% 72 72%<br />
Total 393 38% 648 62% 296 28% 745 72%<br />
Source: 2011 CTHRC <strong>Survey</strong> of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Trucking</strong> Sector QA3 and QA4<br />
<strong>Beyond</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Wheel</strong><br />
13
4. Workforce Profile<br />
This section presents a profile of employees represented in <strong>the</strong> survey of employers.<br />
4.1 Total Employees<br />
Not surprisingly, considering <strong>the</strong> distribution of companies and power units, Ontario accounts for more employees in <strong>the</strong><br />
trucking sector (37%) than o<strong>the</strong>r provinces (Table 19), followed by BC (21%) and Alberta (12%). The highest average<br />
number of employees per company occurs in British Columbia (154) and Ontario (114). 11<br />
Table 19: Total Employees by Region<br />
Region<br />
Number of<br />
Companies<br />
Average Number<br />
per Company<br />
Total Number of<br />
Employees<br />
% of Employees<br />
British Columbia 121 154 18,346 21%<br />
Alberta 174 62 10,648 12%<br />
Saskatchewan 41 69 2,848 3%<br />
Manitoba 130 65 7,758 9%<br />
Ontario 299 114 33,333 37%<br />
Quebec 206 46 9,431 11%<br />
Atlantic Canada 78 82 6,409 7%<br />
Nor<strong>the</strong>rn Canada 1 102 102 < 1%<br />
International 7 27 190 < 1%<br />
Total 1,057 86 89,065 100%<br />
Source: 2011 CTHRC <strong>Survey</strong> of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Trucking</strong> Sector QB1a<br />
Companies with fewer than 100 employees predominate in <strong>the</strong> trucking industry (Table 20), accounting for 85% of <strong>the</strong><br />
total. While <strong>the</strong>se smaller companies account for <strong>the</strong> majority of <strong>the</strong> sample, <strong>the</strong>y represent only 21% of <strong>the</strong> total<br />
employees covered by <strong>the</strong> survey. In contrast, large companies with 500 or more employees represent only 2% of <strong>the</strong><br />
sample but account for 56% of <strong>the</strong> total number of employees. The remaining 24% of employees work for medium-sized<br />
companies(100 to 199 employees), which account for 12% of <strong>the</strong> total survey sample.<br />
Table 20: Employees by Size of Company<br />
Size of Company Number of Companies Number of Employees<br />
Small (0-99) 903 85% 22,049 21%<br />
Medium (100-499) 130 12% 25,297 24%<br />
Large (500+) 24 2% 59,189 56%<br />
Total 1,057 100% 106,535 100%<br />
Source: 2011 CTHRC <strong>Survey</strong> of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Trucking</strong> Sector QA8<br />
Note that sums may not equal 100% due to rounding<br />
11 There is a company in BC with 14,000 employees (highest for any company) and Atlantic Canada has two companies with roughly 2,000 each.<br />
14 <strong>Beyond</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Wheel</strong>
For-hire operators account for 67% of employees in <strong>the</strong> survey (Table 21). Private carriers and owner-operators<br />
account for 32% and 1% of employees, respectively. The average number of employees per company is lowest among<br />
owner-operators (10). Private carriers employ <strong>the</strong> highest average number (121).<br />
Table 21: Total Employees by Type of Operator<br />
Type of Operator<br />
Average Number of<br />
Employees per Company<br />
Total Number of Employees<br />
% of Employment<br />
For Hire Operator 84 59,377 67%<br />
Owner Operator 10 883 1%<br />
Private Carriers 121 28,805 32%<br />
Total 72 89,065 100%<br />
Source: 2011 CTHRC <strong>Survey</strong> of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Trucking</strong> Sector QA2 and QB1<br />
Companies with more than 100 power units account for 24% of total employment in <strong>the</strong> industry (Table 22). Fleets with<br />
10 to 25 power units account for 12%. On average, <strong>the</strong> largest fleets (i.e., more than 100 power units) employ an average<br />
of 603 people. Contrary to expectations, fleets of 10 to 25 employ more people (78 employees), on average, than fleets of<br />
26 to 50 (59 employees).<br />
Table 22: Employees by Fleet Size<br />
Number of Power Units<br />
Average Number of<br />
Employees per Company<br />
Total Employees<br />
% of Employment<br />
Less than 10 15 6,395 4%<br />
10 to 25 78 21,478 12%<br />
26 to 50 59 9,225 5%<br />
51 to 100 96 8,517 24%<br />
More than 100 603 43,442 50%<br />
Total/Overall Average 87 89,057 100%<br />
Source: 2011 CTHRC <strong>Survey</strong> of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Trucking</strong> Sector QA2 and QB1<br />
Of <strong>the</strong> total workforce, <strong>the</strong> majority of employees (58%) work for firms that do short hauls, and 49% of truck drivers are<br />
employed by short-haul companies (Table 23).<br />
Table 23: Employees by Type of Hauling<br />
Type of Hauling Average per Company Total Employees % of Employment<br />
Long Haul 92 35,248 39%<br />
Short Haul 82 51,492 58%<br />
Cross Border Hauling 110 31,775 36%<br />
Domestic Only 76 54,965 62%<br />
Source: 2011 CTHRC <strong>Survey</strong> of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Trucking</strong> Sector QA4 and QB1<br />
<strong>Beyond</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Wheel</strong><br />
15
4.2 Employment in Key Occupations<br />
Not surprisingly, drivers account for <strong>the</strong> majority (73%) of employees in trucking companies. The remaining 27% of<br />
employees directly support truck drivers (Table 24). Almost half (47%) of company truck drivers hold a Class 1/AZ licence<br />
(excluding owner-operator drivers, of whom 22% hold a class 1/AZ licence). Almost two-thirds of companies (60%)<br />
employ a dispatcher.<br />
Table 24: Employees by Occupation/Group<br />
Truck Occupations<br />
Type of Operator<br />
Average Number of<br />
Employees per Company<br />
Total Number of<br />
Employees<br />
% of Employment<br />
Company Truck Drivers (Class 1/AZ) 37 35,689 47%<br />
Company Truck Drivers (Class 3/D) 12 3,115 4%<br />
Owner/Operator Truck Drivers 39 17,199 22%<br />
Shunt Drivers (Class 1/AZ or 3/D) 78 6,090 8%<br />
Cargo Workers 23 3,275 4%<br />
Dispatchers 4 2,640 3%<br />
Freight Claims/Safety & Loss Prevention<br />
Specialists<br />
2 596 1%<br />
Foreman/Supervisor/Manager 5 3,250 4%<br />
Allied and Associated Trades Occupations<br />
Truck/Transport Mechanic 6 2,960 4%<br />
Transport Trailer Technician 6 609 1%<br />
Parts Technicians/Parts Person 3 334
4.3 Employee Demographics<br />
In a male-dominated sector, it is not surprising to find that only 4% of workers in <strong>the</strong> trucking industry are women.<br />
However, female employment varies considerably among <strong>the</strong> key occupations. While females account for fewer than 5%<br />
of drivers (including shunt drivers), as well as mechanics, transport trailer technicians and cargo workers, <strong>the</strong>y account for<br />
25% of freight claims/safety & loss prevention specialists, 13% of parts technicians/parts persons, and 19% of dispatchers<br />
(Table 26).<br />
Table 26: Women in <strong>the</strong> Workforce by Occupation<br />
Occupation Total Employees # Women % Women<br />
Company truck drivers (class 1/AZ) 35,689 1,208 3%<br />
Owner/operator truck drivers (include total number of drivers) 17,199 631 4%<br />
Shunt drivers (Class1/AZ or 3D) 6,090 22
Table 28: Women in <strong>the</strong> Workforce by Operator Type<br />
Type of operator # Women % Women<br />
For Hire Operator 2,611 85%<br />
Owner Operator 38 1%<br />
Private Operator 413 13%<br />
Total 3,062 100%<br />
Source: 2011 CTHRC <strong>Survey</strong> of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Trucking</strong> Sector QA2 and QC3<br />
In terms of age, 64% of <strong>the</strong> industry’s workforce is between <strong>the</strong> ages of 30 and 54 years (Table 29). With <strong>the</strong> exception of<br />
shunt drivers, truck drivers tend to be 45 years old or older. Among truck drivers, 31% of owner-operators are in <strong>the</strong><br />
youngest age group (30 years and younger) compared to Class 3/D drivers (20%) and Class 1/AZ drivers (13%).<br />
Cargo workers are <strong>the</strong> youngest employees, with 51% aged 30 or younger.<br />
Table 29: Employee Age Profile by Occupation<br />
Occupation<br />
Total<br />
Employees<br />
30 years<br />
and under<br />
31 to<br />
44 years<br />
45 to<br />
54 years<br />
55 years<br />
and over<br />
Company truck drivers (class 1/AZ) 35,689 13% 30% 36% 22%<br />
Company truck drivers (class 3/D) 3,115 20% 40% 27% 12%<br />
Owner/operator truck drivers 17,199 31% 20% 27% 22%<br />
Shunt drivers (class 1/AZ or 3D) 6,090 1% 89% 8% 1%<br />
Truck/transport mechanic 2,960 23% 33% 35% 9%<br />
Foreman/supervisor/manager 3,250 15% 39% 34% 12%<br />
Freight claims/safety & loss prevention<br />
specialists<br />
596 12% 38% 33% 16%<br />
Dispatchers 2,640 16% 46% 29% 10%<br />
Transport trailer technician 609 26% 37% 26% 11%<br />
Parts technicians/parts person 334 16% 45% 32% 7%<br />
Cargo workers 3,275 51% 26% 19% 4%<br />
Total 75,757 19% 34% 30% 17%<br />
Source: 2011 CTHRC <strong>Survey</strong> of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Trucking</strong> Sector QC3; Excludes employees in occupations outside <strong>the</strong> key trucking-related occupations (e.g., general labourers, administrative<br />
staff, accounts, etc.) Therefore <strong>the</strong> totals in <strong>the</strong> table do not equal 100% and are lower than <strong>the</strong> total number of employees covered by <strong>the</strong> survey.<br />
The employee age of owner-operators, for-hire operators and private carriers was similar for all age categories (Table 30).<br />
Table 30: Employee Age Profile by Type of Operator<br />
Type of Operator<br />
30 years<br />
and under<br />
31 to<br />
44 years<br />
45 to<br />
54 years<br />
55 years<br />
and over<br />
For Hire Operator 19% 34% 29% 18%<br />
Owner Operator 15% 39% 30% 17%<br />
Private Carrier 16% 34% 33% 16%<br />
Source: 2011 CTHRC <strong>Survey</strong> of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Trucking</strong> Sector QA2 and QC3<br />
18 <strong>Beyond</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Wheel</strong>
The distribution of employees by age group for small and medium-sized companies is similar, with most employees falling<br />
between <strong>the</strong> ages of 30 and 55 (Table 31). Large companies tend to attract younger employees: 23% of <strong>the</strong> employees<br />
in large companies are 30 years or younger compared to 15% in medium-sized and 13% in small companies.<br />
Table 31: Employee Age Profile by Size of Company<br />
Size of Company<br />
30 years<br />
and under<br />
31 to<br />
44 years<br />
45 to<br />
54 years<br />
55 years<br />
and over<br />
Small (0-99) 13% 38% 32% 17%<br />
Medium (100-499) 15% 35% 33% 16%<br />
Large (500+) 23% 31% 28% 18%<br />
Source: 2011 CTHRC <strong>Survey</strong> of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Trucking</strong> Sector QB1a and QC3<br />
The youngest employees in trucking-related occupations work in <strong>the</strong> general freight sector, where 58% are under 45 years<br />
of age (Table 32). The oldest employees work in manufacturing and commodities hauling, where 58% are 45 or older.<br />
Table 32: Employee Age Profile by Occupation<br />
Sector<br />
Total<br />
Employees<br />
30 years<br />
and under<br />
30 to<br />
44 years<br />
45 to<br />
54 years<br />
55 years<br />
and over<br />
General Freight 40,514 22% 36% 25% 18%<br />
Wholesale/Retail Trade 8,743 19% 26% 38% 18%<br />
Manufacturing 2,856 12% 30% 36% 22%<br />
Resource Sector 7,004 17% 30% 38% 15%<br />
Construction 2,557 16% 35% 35% 13%<br />
Utilities 561 18% 37% 26% 19%<br />
Agriculture 2,314 16% 31% 30% 23%<br />
Haulers of Commodities 6,509 11% 31% 42% 16%<br />
O<strong>the</strong>r 3,199 13% 40% 30% 17%<br />
Source: 2011 CTHRC <strong>Survey</strong> of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Trucking</strong> Sector QA3 and QC3<br />
<strong>Beyond</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Wheel</strong><br />
19
5. Industry Demand<br />
This section examines industry demand for employees and covers <strong>the</strong> following issues:<br />
••<br />
Current vacancies;<br />
••<br />
Employee turnover/retention;<br />
••<br />
Future demand; and<br />
••<br />
Recruitment.<br />
5.1 Current Vacancies<br />
<strong>Survey</strong> respondents were asked to provide <strong>the</strong> current number of unfilled positions in each occupation group covered by<br />
<strong>the</strong> survey. Three in ten (30%) companies reported at least one unfilled position in a key occupational group within <strong>the</strong>ir<br />
company. Respondents reported a total of 3,764 unfilled positions among all employers (Table 33).<br />
The largest vacancy rates occur in driving occupations: truck drivers, and particularly company truck drivers with a<br />
class 1/AZ licence, account for 46% of all unfilled positions.<br />
Table 33: Unfilled Positions by Occupation<br />
Driving Occupations<br />
Type of Occupation<br />
# Unfilled<br />
Positions<br />
% Unfilled<br />
Positions<br />
Company Truck Drivers (Class 1/AZ) 1,747 46%<br />
Owner/Operator Truck Drivers 1,234 33%<br />
Company Truck Drivers (Class 3/D) 134 4%<br />
Shunt Drivers (Class 1/AZ or 3/D) 21 1%<br />
Non-Driver Occupations<br />
Dispatchers 59 2%<br />
Cargo Workers 55 1%<br />
Freight Claims/Safety & Loss Prevention Specialists 21 1%<br />
Foreman/Supervisor/Manager 50 1%<br />
Allied and Associated Trades<br />
Truck/Transport Mechanic 197 5%<br />
Transport Trailer Technician 37 1%<br />
Parts Technicians/Parts Person 2
The survey population identified a total of 3,178 unfilled positions in <strong>the</strong> trucking industry (Table 34). The majority of <strong>the</strong>se<br />
unfilled positions (27%) are in Alberta.<br />
Table 34: Top Unfilled Positions by Province – <strong>Trucking</strong><br />
Region<br />
Company Truck Drivers<br />
(Class 1/AZ)<br />
Owner/Operator<br />
Truck Drivers (include total<br />
number of drivers)<br />
Truck/Transport<br />
Mechanic<br />
Alberta 468 27% 299 24% 94 48%<br />
British Columbia 179 10% 158 13% 16 8%<br />
Manitoba 386 22% 66 5% 14 7%<br />
Ontario 403 23% 216 18% 31 16%<br />
Quebec 122 7% 63 5% 16 8%<br />
Saskatchewan 144 8% 163 13% 19 10%<br />
Atlantic Canada 45 3% 269 22% 7 4%<br />
Total 1,747 100% 1,234 100% 197 100%<br />
Source: 2011 CTHRC <strong>Survey</strong> of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Trucking</strong> Sector QA5 and QB2<br />
5.2 Retention<br />
Employee retention was addressed by estimating <strong>the</strong> turnover rate from information provided about employee leaving<br />
patterns, specifically those who leave <strong>the</strong> company within 12 months of employment and those who leave after 12 months<br />
of employment. The following calculation was used to determine <strong>the</strong> average turnover rate:<br />
Average turnover rate =<br />
Sum of job separations<br />
Sum of total employees<br />
The estimated turnover rate for employees who worked for a trucking company for less than 12 months was 7%, on<br />
average. For those employed with a company for more than 12 months, <strong>the</strong> turnover rate decreased to 5%.<br />
5.3 Future Workforce<br />
<strong>Survey</strong> respondents were asked to estimate <strong>the</strong> expected<br />
change in labour force demand in <strong>the</strong> trucking sector over<br />
<strong>the</strong> next 12 months and over <strong>the</strong> next five years.<br />
Respondents were fairly evenly split about whe<strong>the</strong>r and how<br />
<strong>the</strong>ir company’s labour force demand would change over <strong>the</strong><br />
next 12 months: 46% said <strong>the</strong>re would be no change, and<br />
43% expected demand to increase. Five percent (5%)<br />
expected a decrease in demand, and 6% didn’t know.<br />
Approximately one-third (31%) said demand would increase<br />
by as much as 10% over <strong>the</strong> next 12 months (Table 35).<br />
About one in 10 (11%) expected <strong>the</strong> increase to be larger<br />
(i.e., more than 11%).<br />
Table 35: Expected Labour force Demand (12 months out)<br />
Amount of Growth Count Percent<br />
No Change 507 46%<br />
Increase (1% to 5%) 179 17%<br />
Increase (6% to 10%) 156 14%<br />
Increase (11% to 15%) 36 3%<br />
Increase (15%+) 84 8%<br />
Decrease (1% to 5%) 12 1%<br />
Decrease (6% to 10%) 6 1%<br />
Decrease (11% to 15%) 4 1%<br />
Decrease (15%+) 25 2%<br />
Don’t know 68 6%<br />
Total* 1,077 100%<br />
Source: 2011 CTHRC <strong>Survey</strong> of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Trucking</strong> Sector QD1a, b;<br />
Excludes cases with missing information<br />
<strong>Beyond</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Wheel</strong><br />
21
<strong>Beyond</strong> <strong>the</strong> next 12 months, companies expect<br />
greater demand for employees. Almost half<br />
(45%) expect labour force demand to increase<br />
over <strong>the</strong> next five years, 26% expect demand to<br />
stay <strong>the</strong> same and 5% expect it to decrease.<br />
Twenty-one percent (21%) could not provide an<br />
answer. Asked to quantify <strong>the</strong> increase or<br />
decrease in labour force demand, only 68% of<br />
respondents who indicated a change in demand<br />
provided an answer (n=526). Table 36 shows<br />
that 57% of <strong>the</strong>se companies expect an increase<br />
in labour market demand of 10% or less.<br />
5.4 Recruitment<br />
Table 36: Expected Change in Labour Force Demand (5 years out)<br />
Amount of Growth Count Percent<br />
Increase (1% to 5%) 162 31%<br />
Increase (6% to 10%) 135 26%<br />
Increase (11% to 15%) 49 9%<br />
Increase (15%+) 128 24%<br />
Decrease (1% to 5%) 14 3%<br />
Decrease (6% to 10%) 5 1%<br />
Decrease (11% to 15%) 5 1%<br />
Decrease (15%+) 28 5%<br />
Total 526 100%<br />
Source: 2011 CTHRC <strong>Survey</strong> of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Trucking</strong> Sector QD2a<br />
<strong>Survey</strong> respondents were asked to rate <strong>the</strong>ir degree of difficulty in filling vacancies in trucking and related occupations.<br />
Almost six in 10 (59%) said it is difficult/very difficult to fill vacancies for Class 1/AZ truck drivers, and 52% said it was<br />
difficult/very difficult to find owner-operators. Almost half (48%) had difficulty filling positions for Class 3/D drivers<br />
(Figure 2). The difficulty in recruiting for <strong>the</strong>se types of positions offers one reason why <strong>the</strong>re are more vacancies in driving<br />
occupations than in o<strong>the</strong>r occupations in <strong>the</strong> industry and why <strong>the</strong>re is a shortage of drivers in <strong>the</strong> trucking sector. O<strong>the</strong>r<br />
difficult positions to fill include transport trailer technicians (68%) and truck/transport mechanics (53%). Both occupations<br />
belong to <strong>the</strong> Allied and Associated trades.<br />
Truck drivers, mostly company truck drivers with a class 1/AZ licence, account for <strong>the</strong> greatest percentage of unfilled<br />
positions in <strong>the</strong> industry and are reported to be <strong>the</strong> most difficult occupations to fill.<br />
Figure 2: Degree of Difficulty Filling Positions by Occupation<br />
17% 25% 59%<br />
27% 25% 48%<br />
29% 19% 52%<br />
28% 13% 60%<br />
27% 20% 53%<br />
19% 13% 68%<br />
31% 11% 58%<br />
30% 9% 61%<br />
31% 11% 58%<br />
25% 14% 61%<br />
30% 13% 57%<br />
Source: 2011 CTHRC <strong>Survey</strong> of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Trucking</strong> Sector QC2; total may not sum to exactly to100% due to rounding<br />
22 <strong>Beyond</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Wheel</strong>
Appendix A:<br />
Allied and Associated Trades<br />
<strong>Survey</strong> <strong>Technical</strong> <strong>Report</strong><br />
<strong>Beyond</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Wheel</strong><br />
23
Table of Contents<br />
1. Introduction. ...................................................................................................................................................25<br />
2. <strong>Survey</strong> Methodology. ................................................................................................................................26<br />
2.1. Development of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Survey</strong> Instrument. ...................................................................................................26<br />
2.2 Sample Development .................................................................................................................................26<br />
2.2.1 <strong>Survey</strong> Administration .......................................................................................................................27<br />
2.3 Respondent Characteristics ........................................................................................................................27<br />
2.4 Employer Sector. ...........................................................................................................................................27<br />
3. Workforce Profile. .......................................................................................................................................29<br />
3.1 Employment in Key Occupations ..............................................................................................................29<br />
3.2 Employee Demographics ...........................................................................................................................30<br />
4. Industry Demand. ........................................................................................................................................32<br />
4.1 Current Vacancies .......................................................................................................................................32<br />
4.2 Retention ......................................................................................................................................................33<br />
4.3 Recruitment .................................................................................................................................................33<br />
24 <strong>Beyond</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Wheel</strong>
1. Introduction<br />
The <strong>Canadian</strong> <strong>Trucking</strong> Human Resources Council (CTHRC) has been in operation since January 1994. It is a national<br />
organization governed by a Board of Directors that represents a variety of interests within <strong>the</strong> trucking industry. 1 The CTHRC<br />
was formed during a period of de-regulation in <strong>the</strong> trucking industry and is committed to <strong>the</strong> development of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Canadian</strong><br />
trucking industry by supporting human resource needs and responding with research, training, and advice.<br />
The CTHRC is currently conducting <strong>the</strong> Labour Market Information (LMI) Project, <strong>the</strong> goal of which is to enable <strong>the</strong> CTHRC<br />
to provide complete, accurate and timely forecasts/projections for key trucking occupations. A survey (CTHRC <strong>Survey</strong> of <strong>the</strong><br />
<strong>Trucking</strong> Sector) of employers was completed with companies in <strong>the</strong> trucking sector and companies who hire employees in<br />
allied and associated trades to collect information about <strong>the</strong>ir current workforce, and projected workforce needs. The<br />
majority of survey respondents were companies in <strong>the</strong> trucking sector as few responses were obtained from companies in<br />
<strong>the</strong> allied and associated trades sector. In order to provide an accurate and representative evaluation of <strong>the</strong> current<br />
occupations within <strong>the</strong> industry an additional survey was conducted that targeted companies in <strong>the</strong> allied and associated<br />
trades (Allied and Associated Trades <strong>Survey</strong>).<br />
Organizations in <strong>the</strong> allied and associated trades employ individuals who, while not directly employed by <strong>the</strong> truck<br />
transportation firms, provide critical support to <strong>the</strong> trucking sector. In general, companies in <strong>the</strong> allied and associated trades<br />
employ individuals in <strong>the</strong> following occupations: truck/transport mechanic, transport trailer technician, and parts technician.<br />
The information obtained from this study was used to provide additional information as to <strong>the</strong> employment characteristics<br />
of workers in <strong>the</strong>se “support” sectors. Originally this information was to be collected by <strong>the</strong> CTHRC <strong>Survey</strong> of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Trucking</strong><br />
Sector, however, due to limited responses to <strong>the</strong> survey (only 25 completions), <strong>the</strong> CTHRC commissioned R.A. Malatest &<br />
Associates Ltd. to complete a separate survey of allied and associated trade employers, with <strong>the</strong> goal of obtaining 200<br />
survey completions. Information from this survey was subsequently incorporated into <strong>the</strong> HR Benchmarking Tool developed<br />
as part of <strong>the</strong> LMI Project.<br />
The results of <strong>the</strong> Allied and Associated Trades <strong>Survey</strong> are presented in this report. Detailed information on worker<br />
characteristics can be accessed via <strong>the</strong> CTHRC LMI tool (http://stg.cthrc.com/lih/en/). The remainder of this report is<br />
organized as follows:<br />
Section 2: <strong>Survey</strong> Methodology<br />
Section 3: Workforce Profile<br />
Section 4: Industry Demand<br />
1 <strong>Canadian</strong> <strong>Trucking</strong> Human Resources Council. (2010). Retrieved February 20, 2012 from CTHRC Web Site: http://www.cthrc.com/en/content/about-us<br />
<strong>Beyond</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Wheel</strong><br />
25
2: <strong>Survey</strong> Methodology<br />
Several activities were completed for <strong>the</strong> survey component of <strong>the</strong> project. Each activity is described in <strong>the</strong> remainder of<br />
this section.<br />
2.1 Development of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Survey</strong> Instrument<br />
The CTHRC <strong>Survey</strong> of <strong>the</strong> Allied and Associated Trades was designed to collect information about <strong>the</strong> characteristics of this<br />
sector and <strong>the</strong>ir workforce. As part of <strong>the</strong> survey design, information on <strong>the</strong> three key occupations was identified for<br />
inclusion in <strong>the</strong> study:<br />
••<br />
Truck/Transport Mechanic (heavy duty): Inspect, test, diagnose and repair truck and truck-tractor engines and o<strong>the</strong>r<br />
key operating systems.<br />
••<br />
Transport Trailer Technician (heavy duty): Repair, overhaul, inspect and maintain <strong>the</strong> suspension, brake and electrical<br />
systems on trailers.<br />
••<br />
Parts Technicians (Parts Person): Responsible for ordering, warehousing, inventory control and sales of parts.<br />
The survey consisted of three sections:<br />
••<br />
Your Organization (i.e., classification and location);<br />
••<br />
Your Workforce (i.e., number of employees in each occupation); and<br />
••<br />
Retention of Workforce (i.e., staff turnover, difficulty filling occupations, and age profile of current employees).<br />
To ensure <strong>the</strong> questionnaire was appropriate for employers in <strong>the</strong> allied and associated trades; it was reviewed and pilot<br />
tested through a validation process. The validation process involved six meetings with members of Provincial Labour Market<br />
Networks and members from <strong>the</strong> Allied and Associated Trades. Adjustments were made to <strong>the</strong> survey instrument as a<br />
result of <strong>the</strong> validation process, and <strong>the</strong> questionnaire was fur<strong>the</strong>r tested through rigorous in-house protocols to ensure<br />
accurate CallWeb-CATI programming of <strong>the</strong> survey instrument. The questionnaire was made available in both French and<br />
English. A copy of <strong>the</strong> finalized survey instrument is provided in Appendix A.<br />
2.2 Sample Development<br />
The sample included all companies in <strong>the</strong> allied and associated trades from <strong>the</strong> first survey (<strong>Survey</strong> of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Trucking</strong> Sector)<br />
and a new sample that targeted only companies in <strong>the</strong> allied and associated trades across Canada.<br />
The majority of companies in <strong>the</strong> allied and associated trades can be identified by <strong>the</strong> Standard Industrial Classification<br />
Codes (SIC) 37 (Transportation Equipment Manufacturing).<br />
To ensure a comprehensive sample frame was developed for <strong>the</strong> study, R.A. Malatest & Associates Ltd. included companies<br />
from <strong>the</strong> CTHRC member database and a large sample of employers in <strong>the</strong> allied and associated trades sectors from <strong>the</strong><br />
InfoCanada database (using <strong>the</strong> SIC codes).<br />
The SIC codes and specific types of businesses included in <strong>the</strong> sample were:<br />
••<br />
371109 - Truck-Manufacturers<br />
••<br />
371410 - Truck Equipment & Parts-Manufacturers<br />
••<br />
3715 - Truck Trailers (Manufacturers)<br />
••<br />
379901 - Manufacturers-Trailers<br />
••<br />
379908 - Trailers-Equipment & Parts-Manufacturers<br />
••<br />
753812 - Truck-Repairing & Service<br />
••<br />
753813 - Trailers-Repairing & Service<br />
26 <strong>Beyond</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Wheel</strong>
2.2.1 <strong>Survey</strong> Administration<br />
All companies included in <strong>the</strong> sample frame had contact information. In order to maximize <strong>the</strong> representativeness of <strong>the</strong><br />
completed surveys by region, companies were contacted by telephone during business hours. The study was explained and<br />
company personnel were invited to complete <strong>the</strong> survey by telephone.<br />
Full survey administration by R.A. Malatest & Associates Ltd. commenced on April 17, 2012 and continued until April 24,<br />
2012. A total of 231 surveys were completed, which was greater than <strong>the</strong> initial target of 200 completions.<br />
2.3 Respondent Characteristics<br />
A key requirement of <strong>the</strong> study was to ensure that <strong>the</strong>re was sufficient representation from each province and/or region in<br />
Canada to support <strong>the</strong> development of workforce probes at ei<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> provincial and/or sub-sector level. In this context, one<br />
goal was to obtain a minimum of 20 completions for most provinces, with <strong>the</strong> exception of <strong>the</strong> smaller Atlantic Provinces in<br />
which <strong>the</strong>re are relatively few employers. As highlighted in Table 1, <strong>the</strong>re was a minimum of 20 employer responses for<br />
each province with <strong>the</strong> exception of PEI (10 employer responses) and Newfoundland and Labrador (5 employer<br />
responses).<br />
Table A1: Geographical Distribution of Allied and Associated Trades Companies (Head Office)<br />
Location<br />
CTHRC <strong>Survey</strong> – Allied and Associated Trades<br />
Count<br />
Percent<br />
Alberta 28 12%<br />
British Columbia 21 9%<br />
Manitoba 20 9%<br />
New Brunswick 19 8%<br />
Newfoundland and Labrador 5 2%<br />
Nova Scotia 21 9%<br />
Ontario 40 17%<br />
Prince Edward Island 10 4%<br />
Quebec 44 19%<br />
Saskatchewan 22 10%<br />
O<strong>the</strong>r 1
Table A2: Employer Sector by Region<br />
Region<br />
Employer Sector<br />
Trailer Sales, Service<br />
and Leasing<br />
Truck and Trailer<br />
Manufacturer<br />
Truck Sales, Services,<br />
and Leasing<br />
British Columbia (n=26) 15% 4% 81%<br />
Alberta (n=20) 5% 0 95%<br />
Manitoba (n=19) 11% 5% 84%<br />
New Brunswick (n=19) 16% 0 84%<br />
Newfoundland and Labrador (n=5) 20% 0 80%<br />
Nova Scotia (n=21) 19% 0 81%<br />
Ontario (n=39) 8% 0 92%<br />
Prince Edward Island (n=10) 3% 1% 6%<br />
Quebec (n=42) 21% 7% 71%<br />
Saskatchewan (n=21) 10% 10% 81%<br />
Source: Allied and Associated Trades 2011 CTHRC <strong>Survey</strong> of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Trucking</strong> Sector & 2012 CTHRC<br />
<strong>Survey</strong> of <strong>the</strong> Allied and Associated Trades QA2 and QA5; N=231<br />
28 <strong>Beyond</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Wheel</strong>
3: Workforce Profile<br />
A profile of employees from companies in <strong>the</strong> allied and associated trades that participated in <strong>the</strong> survey is contained in this<br />
section.<br />
3.1 Employment in Key Occupations<br />
Truck/transport mechanics accounted for almost two-thirds (60%) of employees in <strong>the</strong> allied and associated trades.<br />
The remaining employees were split between transport trailer technicians (23%) and parts technicians (17%) (Table 3).<br />
Table A3: Employees by Occupation/Group<br />
Occupation<br />
Allied and Associated Trades Occupations<br />
Average #<br />
Employees per<br />
Occupation per<br />
Company<br />
Total Employees<br />
per Occupation<br />
% of Total Allied<br />
and Associated<br />
Workforce<br />
Truck/Transport Mechanic 10 2195 60%<br />
Transport Trailer Technician 4 827 23%<br />
Parts Technician (Parts Person) 3 627 17%<br />
Source: Allied and Associated Trades 2011 CTHRC <strong>Survey</strong> of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Trucking</strong> Sector & 2012 CTHRC <strong>Survey</strong> of <strong>the</strong> Allied and Associated Trades QB2; n=3,649 .<br />
Total number of companies N=231<br />
Based on <strong>the</strong> three occupations of interest, survey results indicate that <strong>the</strong> majority of companies (74%) in <strong>the</strong> allied and<br />
associated trades employed apprentices. As presented in Table 4, <strong>the</strong> companies in <strong>the</strong> survey employed 716 apprentices.<br />
The most common type of apprenticeship was for truck/transport mechanics, which accounted for 84% of <strong>the</strong> total<br />
apprentice employment in <strong>the</strong> industry.<br />
Table A4: Apprentice Employment<br />
Occupation<br />
% of Companies<br />
that Employ<br />
Apprentices<br />
Total Apprentices<br />
Employed<br />
% of Apprentices<br />
Employed<br />
Average Employed<br />
per Firm<br />
Truck/Transport Mechanic 59% 601 84% 4<br />
Transport Trailer Technician 7% 58 8%
3.2 Employee Demographics<br />
The survey collected data to explore <strong>the</strong> age and gender profile of employees from <strong>the</strong> allied and associated trades sector.<br />
Given that <strong>the</strong> trucking industry is male-dominated, it is not surprising to find that <strong>the</strong> proportion of female workers in <strong>the</strong><br />
allied and associated trades was low at 5% (Table 5). There was some variation in female employment among <strong>the</strong> three<br />
allied and associated trades occupations examined. Females accounted for almost one quarter of all parts technicians<br />
(21%), however <strong>the</strong>y accounted for only 2% of transport trailer technicians, and less than 1% of truck/transport mechanics.<br />
Table AA5: Women in <strong>the</strong> Workforce by Occupation<br />
Occupation Total Employees # Women<br />
% Share of Female<br />
Workforce<br />
Truck/transport mechanic 2195 19
Table A7: Employee Age Profile by Occupation<br />
Occupation<br />
Total Employees<br />
30 years and<br />
under<br />
31 to 44 years 45 to 54 years<br />
55 years and<br />
over<br />
Truck/transport mechanic 2177 29% 38% 22% 11%<br />
Transport trailer technician 315 27% 43% 18% 12%<br />
Parts technician (parts person) 685 24% 41% 23% 13%<br />
Total 3177 28% 39 % 22% 11%<br />
Source: Allied and Associated Trades 2011 CTHRC <strong>Survey</strong> of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Trucking</strong> Sector & 2012 CTHRC <strong>Survey</strong> of <strong>the</strong> Allied and Associated Trades QC3; Some respondents were<br />
unable to complete this section of <strong>the</strong> survey <strong>the</strong>refore <strong>the</strong> total number of employees is lower than <strong>the</strong> total number of employees covered in o<strong>the</strong>r sections of <strong>the</strong> survey.<br />
For all three sectors almost two-thirds of <strong>the</strong>ir workforce was between <strong>the</strong> ages of 31-54 (Trailer Sales, Services and Leasing<br />
60%, Truck and Trailer Manufacturer 65%, Truck Sales, Service and Leasing 62%) (Table 8). While both <strong>the</strong> trailer sales,<br />
services and leasing, and <strong>the</strong> truck and trailer manufacturer sectors had a similar proportion of employees younger than 44<br />
years (70%, 74%) and older than 45 years (30%, 26%), <strong>the</strong> truck and trailer manufacturing sector had fewer employees<br />
under <strong>the</strong> age of 44 years (62%) and more employees over <strong>the</strong> age of 45 years (38%).<br />
Table A8: Employee Age Profile by Employer Sector<br />
Employer Sector 30 years and under 31 to 44 years 45 to 54 years 55 years and over<br />
Trailer Sales, Services and Leasing 31% 39% 21% 9%<br />
Truck and Trailer Manufacturer 27% 47% 18% 8%<br />
Truck Sales, Service and Leasing 23% 39% 23% 15%<br />
Source: Allied and Associated Trades 2011 CTHRC <strong>Survey</strong> of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Trucking</strong> Sector & 2012 CTHRC<br />
<strong>Survey</strong> of <strong>the</strong> Allied and Associated Trades QA2 and QC3<br />
N=3148*<br />
*The total N does not include employees in occupations outside allied and associated trades (E.g. o<strong>the</strong>r employer sector). Therefore <strong>the</strong> N used to calculate <strong>the</strong> above table is<br />
lower than <strong>the</strong> total employees (N= 3,649) previously reported.<br />
<strong>Beyond</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Wheel</strong><br />
31
4: Industry Demand<br />
This section examines industry demand for employees, based on <strong>the</strong> responses provided by <strong>the</strong> companies represented in<br />
<strong>the</strong> Allied and Associated Trades <strong>Survey</strong>. The following issues are examined:<br />
••<br />
Current vacancies;<br />
••<br />
Employee turnover/retention; and<br />
••<br />
Recruitment.<br />
4.1 Current Vacancies<br />
<strong>Survey</strong> respondents were asked to provide <strong>the</strong> current number of unfilled positions in each of <strong>the</strong> three occupation groups<br />
covered by <strong>the</strong> survey. Almost two-thirds (64%) of <strong>the</strong> companies surveyed reported at least one unfilled position in an<br />
allied and associated trades occupation within <strong>the</strong>ir company; <strong>the</strong>re was a total of 359 unfilled positions among all<br />
employers (Table 9).<br />
The estimated vacancy rate was highest for <strong>the</strong> transport trailer technician occupation, where vacancies represented<br />
approximately 10% of all positions. The estimate vacancy rates for both truck/transport mechanics (9%) and parts<br />
technicians (7%) were below that of transport trailer technicians. 2<br />
Table A9: Unfilled Positions by Occupation<br />
Type of Occupation # Unfilled Positions Vacancy Rate<br />
Truck/Transport Mechanic 218 9%<br />
Transport Trailer Technician 96 10%<br />
Parts Technicians (Parts Person) 45 7%<br />
Total 359 9%<br />
Source: Allied and Associated Trades 2011 CTHRC <strong>Survey</strong> of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Trucking</strong> Sector & 2012 CTHRC<br />
<strong>Survey</strong> of <strong>the</strong> Allied and Associated Trades QB2<br />
When examining <strong>the</strong> vacancy rate by province (10), it is apparent that <strong>the</strong> estimated vacancy rate was highest across all<br />
three occupations in Newfoundland and Labrador (Truck/Transport Mechanic 30%, Transport Trailer Technician 56%, Parts<br />
Technicians 20%) and Manitoba (Truck/Transport Mechanic 20%, Transport Trailer Technician 52%, Parts Technician 15%).<br />
The lowest estimate vacancy rate for transport trailer technicians occurred in New Brunswick (6%), for transport trailer<br />
technicians in Alberta (2%) and Ontario (2%), and for parts technicians in British Columbia (2%).<br />
2 Vacancy Rate was calculated as #of vacant positions/ (# of vacant positions + # of filled positions)<br />
32 <strong>Beyond</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Wheel</strong>
Table A10: Vacancy Rate by Province –Allied and Associated Trades<br />
Region<br />
Truck/Transport Mechanic<br />
Transport Trailer<br />
Technician<br />
Parts Technician/Parts<br />
Person<br />
Alberta 53 11% 1 2% 12 9%<br />
British Columbia 14 8% 3 18% 1 2%<br />
Manitoba 26 20% 12 52% 5 15%<br />
New Brunswick 7 6% 2 14% 1 3%<br />
Newfoundland and Labrador 9 30% 5 56% 2 20%<br />
Nova Scotia 16 11% 4 15% 3 5%<br />
Ontario 19 10% 1 2% 4 10%<br />
Prince Edward Island 8 20% 1 50% 1 6%<br />
Quebec 31 12% 64 13% 6 6%<br />
Saskatchewan 35 15% 3 17% 10 12%<br />
Total 218 9% 96 10% 45 7%<br />
Source: Allied and Associated Trades 2011 CTHRC <strong>Survey</strong> of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Trucking</strong> Sector & 2012 CTHRC <strong>Survey</strong> of <strong>the</strong> Allied and Associated Trades QA5 and QB2<br />
Note: Provincial data should be interpreted with caution due to <strong>the</strong> small sample sizes.<br />
4.2 Retention<br />
Employee retention was explored by estimating <strong>the</strong> turnover rate from information provided in <strong>the</strong> survey about employee<br />
leaving patterns, specifically those who leave <strong>the</strong> company within 12 months of employment and those who leave after<br />
12 months of employment. The following calculation was used to determine <strong>the</strong> average turnover rate:<br />
Average turnover rate =<br />
Sum of job separations<br />
Sum of total employees 3<br />
The estimated turnover rate for employees who had worked for an allied and associated trades company for less than<br />
12 months was 11%, on average. For those employed with an allied and associated trades company for more than<br />
12 months, <strong>the</strong> turnover rate decreased slightly to 7%.<br />
4.3 Recruitment<br />
<strong>Survey</strong> respondents were asked to rate <strong>the</strong> degree of difficulty for <strong>the</strong>ir company in filling vacancies in <strong>the</strong> three allied and<br />
associated trades related occupations. Results suggested that for all three allied and associated trades’ occupations<br />
recruitment is difficult (Figure 1). Close to three-quarters of allied and associated trade companies reported that it is difficult/<br />
very difficult to fill vacancies in truck/transport mechanic (82%) and in transport trailer technician (74%). More than half<br />
(52%) had difficulty in filling positions for parts technicians. The difficulty in recruiting for <strong>the</strong>se positions could be one<br />
reason for <strong>the</strong> high rate (64%) of allied and associated trade companies that reported at least one unfilled position (Section<br />
4.1). This suggests that <strong>the</strong>re is a current shortage of workers in allied and associated trade occupations, due to <strong>the</strong> difficulty<br />
in filling <strong>the</strong>se positions.<br />
3 Leavers and terminations<br />
<strong>Beyond</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Wheel</strong><br />
33
Figure A1: Degree of Difficulty Filling Positions by Occupation<br />
82%<br />
Truck/Transport Mechanic<br />
5%<br />
13%<br />
74%<br />
Transport Trailer Technician<br />
8%<br />
18%<br />
52%<br />
Parts Technicians/Parts Person<br />
20%<br />
29%<br />
Difficult/Very Difficult Somewhat difficult Not at all difficult<br />
Source: Allied and Associated Trades 2011 CTHRC <strong>Survey</strong> of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Trucking</strong> Sector & 2012 CTHRC <strong>Survey</strong> of <strong>the</strong> Allied and Associated Trades QC2; total may not sum to exactly<br />
to100% due to rounding<br />
34 <strong>Beyond</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Wheel</strong>