25.12.2014 Views

amÔ≠>r` AßJya AZwgßYmZ H - National Research Centre for Grapes

amÔ≠>r` AßJya AZwgßYmZ H - National Research Centre for Grapes

amÔ≠>r` AßJya AZwgßYmZ H - National Research Centre for Grapes

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

amÔ≠><strong>r`</strong> AßJya AZwgßYmZ H{$›–<br />

<strong>National</strong> <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Centre</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Grapes</strong><br />

dmof©H$ ‡oVd{XZ Annual Report 2006-07


dmof©H$ ‡oVd{XZ Annual Report 2006-07<br />

amÔ≠><strong>r`</strong> AßJya AZwgßYmZ H{$›–<br />

(^maV<strong>r`</strong> H•$of AZwgßYmZ [nafX)<br />

S>mH$ [{Q>r gߪ`m 3, _mßOar \$m_© S>mH$Ka, gm{bm[ya am{S>, [wU{ - 412 307<br />

Phone : 020-26914245 • Fax : 020-26914246 • E-mail : nrcgrape.mah@nic.in<br />

<strong>National</strong> <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Centre</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Grapes</strong><br />

(Indian Council of Agricultural <strong>Research</strong>)<br />

P. B. No. 3, Manjri Farm P. O., Solapur Road, Pune - 412307<br />

Tel. : 020-26914245 • Fax : 020-26914246 • Email : nrcgrape.mah@nic.in


Correct Citation :<br />

Annual Report 2006-07<br />

<strong>National</strong> <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Centre</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Grapes</strong><br />

Manjri Farm P. O.<br />

Pune - 412 307, India<br />

Edited by :<br />

Dr. P.G. Adsule<br />

Dr. Anuradha Upadhyay<br />

Dr. Indu S. Sawant<br />

Dr. R. G. Somkuwar<br />

Dr. J. Sharma<br />

Dr. S. D. Ramteke<br />

Dr. A. K. Sharma<br />

Photo Credits :<br />

Dr. G. S. Karibasappa<br />

Dr. S. D. Sawant<br />

Dr. R. G. Somkuwar<br />

Hindi Translation :<br />

Dr. Anuradha Upadhyay<br />

Dr. A. K. Sharma<br />

Word Processing :<br />

Ms. Shailaja V. Satam<br />

Cover Page :<br />

Red Globe, Director General (ICAR) discussing with scientists of the<br />

institute, Rootstock propagation, DDG (Hort.) on visit of vineyard,<br />

Inhouse discussion on mealybug issue.<br />

Published by :<br />

Dr. P. G. Adsule<br />

Director, <strong>National</strong> <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Centre</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Grapes</strong>, Pune - 412307<br />

Printed at : Flamingo Business Systems, Telefax : 020-24214636


Contents<br />

1. Preface i<br />

2. H$m`©H$mar gmamße iii<br />

3. Executive Summary vi<br />

4. Introduction 1<br />

5. <strong>Research</strong> Achievements 3<br />

6. Collaborative, Externally Funded, Contract <strong>Research</strong> and Consultancy Projects 30<br />

7. Technology Assessed and Transferred 31<br />

8. Education and Training 34<br />

9. Awards and Recognitions 36<br />

10. Linkages and Collaboration Including Externally Funded Projects 36<br />

11. Publications 37<br />

12. Meetings of QRT, RAC, IMC, SRC with Significant Decisions 41<br />

13. Consultancy, Patents and Commercialization of Technology 43<br />

14. Approved On-Going Institute Projects 43<br />

15. Participation of Scientists in Conferences, Meetings, 44<br />

Workshops, Seminars, Symposia etc.<br />

16. Distinguished Visitors 46<br />

17. <strong>Research</strong> and Management Personnel 46<br />

18. Infrastructure Development 46<br />

19. Other Activities 47<br />

20. Meteorological Data 48


Preface<br />

Grape area and production over a period is increasing steadily which indicates the growth of<br />

this sector. This is more evident in case of wine grapes. Keeping this in view, the experimentation<br />

on wine grape is being emphasized more. Enough emphasis was given on the development of<br />

infrastructure in terms of completion of ongoing various farm structures, roads and other works. Few<br />

new equipments and tools were also acquired <strong>for</strong> various laboratories of the institute. Further,<br />

scientific manpower in Plant Protection was also strengthened during this period.<br />

The institute has progressed by leaps and bounds during one decade of its establishment.<br />

Excellent infrastructure is developed during the last five years and the laboratories are now well<br />

equipped with modern and sophisticated equipments. Several agencies specially APEDA and DBT<br />

have funded research projects of the Institute. The Institute's contribution towards progress of grape<br />

industry in the country was recognized at different <strong>for</strong>a. Excellent ef<strong>for</strong>ts of this Institute as <strong>National</strong><br />

Referral Laboratory resulted in considerable reduction in pesticide residues in export grapes during<br />

the last four years as compared to 2003-04 as the first year of the programme. This is also helping<br />

in reduction of pesticide use in domestic grape production.<br />

During the period, clonal selections identified by the farmers were collected and added to the<br />

germplasm. Work on screening of large number of germplasm was undertaken to evaluate their<br />

resistance / tolerance to economically important diseases and insect pests and few were identified<br />

<strong>for</strong> further research. Promising hybrids developed in previous years were further evaluated <strong>for</strong> their<br />

suitability <strong>for</strong> table and wine purpose. In biotechnology, work on molecular tagging continued further<br />

<strong>for</strong> conclusive studies and developed molecular techniques <strong>for</strong> variety and hybrid identification besides<br />

testing genetic variability.<br />

Studies on yield per<strong>for</strong>mance of commercial table and wine varieties were continued using<br />

different canopy models and data was collected. Per<strong>for</strong>mance of Tas-A-Ganesh grafted on 110 R<br />

rootstock was found to be better as compared to other rootstocks. Pink berry in table grape variety<br />

was identified as major problem and explorating work in development of infrastructure <strong>for</strong><br />

undertaking this work was initiated. Preliminary work like survey of this problem, effect of various<br />

cultural practices and use of various chemicals <strong>for</strong> improving quality was also undertaken during this<br />

period. <strong>Research</strong> work initiated earlier on nutrient and soil management was continued further with<br />

more emphasis on wine grapes and deficiencies of various nutrients and its management. Work on<br />

soil biology in terms of studying the mould flora of rhizosphere and non-rhizosphere was also initiated<br />

during this period.<br />

Management of commercially important insect pests and diseases is an important in grape<br />

cultivation since it decides the total cost of grape cultivation. During the period, various new<br />

chemicals were studied <strong>for</strong> their bio-efficacy, and residue data to work out their appropriate Post<br />

Harvest Interval (PHI) and Maximum Residue Limit (MRL) values, keeping in the view the export<br />

market <strong>for</strong> table grapes. Based on this study, the list of recommended chemicals in Annexure - 7 and<br />

11 under the Pesticide Residue Monitoring Plan of APEDA was revised and necessary changes were<br />

made through the program of <strong>National</strong> Referral Laboratory <strong>for</strong> this work. As a result of this good<br />

work, today export has reached to level of 55,000 MT from the level of 20,000 - 22,000 MT four<br />

years back.<br />

| i |


NRC <strong>for</strong> <strong>Grapes</strong> | Annual Report 2006-07<br />

Transfer of Technology and in<strong>for</strong>mation through training programmes, field visits, seminars and<br />

interaction with the growers is an important and integral activity of the Institute. Training<br />

programmes on integrated pest and nutrient management, and advances in tropical viticulture<br />

received enormous response from the growers. Technologies developed during the last few years<br />

were transferred to the growers through frequent field visits, organizing training programmes at the<br />

institute and participating in seminars organized by the grape growers' associations of different states.<br />

The scientists of the Institute were frequently invited by other organizations like growers' associations,<br />

societies, State Govts. agencies as resource persons <strong>for</strong> training programmes. The Institute published<br />

several technical bulletins, leaflets and popular articles in local language during the period.<br />

Gross revenue of Rs. 40.19 lakhs was generated against the target of Rs. 40.00 lakhs through<br />

training, consultancy, contract research and services and sale of planting material and farm produce<br />

and interest on term deposit receipts during the period of work.<br />

With the limited manpower, the Institute has made all ef<strong>for</strong>ts to fulfill the aspirations of the<br />

various stakeholders of grape industry in the country. For all this success, the credit goes to the<br />

scientific, technical, administrative and supporting staff of the Institute besides the backup support<br />

from the Headquarters office at New Delhi.<br />

I would like to place on record the guidance and the encouragement received from Dr. Mangala<br />

Rai, Secretary, DARE and Director General, ICAR. I also appreciate the ef<strong>for</strong>ts and help received<br />

from my scientific and technical staff members in the preparation of this important document.<br />

Place : Pune<br />

Date : December 2007<br />

(P. G. ADSULE)<br />

Director<br />

| ii |


H$m`©H$mar gmamße<br />

amÔ≠><strong>r`</strong> AßJya AZwgßYmZ H{$›– H$s ÒWm[Zm gZ 1997 _{ß h˛B©$& H{$›– H$m C‘{Ì` AßJya CÀ[mXZ, CÀ[mXH$Vm Am°a<br />

C[`m{J H$m{ ‡^modV H$aZ{ dmc{ O°odH$ Am°a AO°odH$ oZ`m_H$m| H$m{ gwbPmZ{ h{Vw _m°obH$ Am°a gm_naH$ _hÀd H$m<br />

AZwgßYmZ h°$& BZ C‘{Ì`m| H$s [yoV© H{$ obE odo^fi AZwgßYmZ H$m`©H´$_m| H{$ A›VJ©V AZwgßYmZ oH$`m Om ahm h°$&<br />

EH$ XeH$ _| H{$›– Z{ Mh˛±_wIr odH$mg oH$`m h°$& o[N>b{ [m±M dfm~ _| CÀH•$apple> ]woZ`mXr T>m±Mm odH$ogV oH$`m J`m<br />

h°$& g^r ‡`m{JembmE± ZdrZV_ Am°a [naÓH•$V C[H$aUm| g{ b°g h¢$& odo^fi EO{p›g`m| O°g{ E[rS>m Am°a S>r ]r Q>r Z{<br />

H$B© AZwgßYmZ [na`m{OZmAm| H$m{ AmoW©H$ ghm`Vm Xr h°$& X{e _| AßJya C⁄m{J H{$ odH$mg _| H|$›– H{$ gh`m{J H$m{ H$B©<br />

_ßMm| [a ghmam J`m$& amÔ≠><strong>r`</strong> gßX^© ‡`m{Jembm H{$ Í$[ _| H{$›– H{$ CÀH•$Ô> ‡`mgm| H{$ \$bÒdÍ$[ Bg df© oZ`m©oVV AßJya<br />

_| H$sQ>ZmeH$ Ade{fm| H$s _mÃm _| o[N>b{ VrZ dfm~ H{$ _wH$m]b{ _hÀd[yU© H$_r h˛B©$& Bgg{ Ka{bw CÀ[mXZ _|<br />

H$sQ>ZmeH$m| H{$ ‡`m{J _| ^r H$_r hm{ ahr h°$&<br />

15 gßÒWmZ<strong>r`</strong> H$m`m©H´$_m| H{$ Abmdm, 1 S>r ]r Q>r, 3 E[rS>m Am°a 1 Z{Q>dH©$ [na`m{OZm H{$ A›VJ©V AZwgßYmZ<br />

H$m`© h˛Am$& BgH{$ AoVna∑V H$B© AZw]ßY VWm [am_e© [na`m{OZmAm| [a ^r H$m_ h˛Am$& df© H{$ Xm°amZ H{$›– H$s<br />

CÑ{IZ<strong>r`</strong> C[bp„Y`m± oZÂZ h¢$&<br />

\$gb gwYma<br />

AßJya oH$gmZm| ¤mam [hMmZ{ JE eaX grS>b°g H{$ Xm{ ∑bm{Z H$m{ gßJ´ohV H$a C›h| amÔ≠><strong>r`</strong> AßJya OZZ–Ï` gßJ´h<br />

_| gpÂ_obV oH$`m J`m$& OZZ–Ï` H{$ ‡j{Ã [arjU _| _wª` \ß$\y$X am{Jm| H{$ ‡oV am{oYV ‡odoapple>`m| H$s [hMmZ H$s<br />

J`r$& S>mCZr o_ÎS>Áy, [mCS>ar o_ÎS>Áy Am°a EßW´{H$Zm{µO H{$ ‡oVam{Yr ‡odoapple>`m| H$s [hMmZ H$s JB©$H$sQ> oW´flg H{$ ‡oV<br />

am{Yr H$B© ‡odoapple>`m| H$s ^r [hMmZ H$s J`r$& _ycd•ßV H$m H$mo`©H$s O°dagm`Z JwUm| H{$ AmYma [a JwUrH$aU oH$`m<br />

J`m$& ]{ab|oS>`ar Am°a Í$[pÒQ≠>g H{$ gßH$a _ycd•ßV _| g]g{ AoYH$ \$sZm{b _mÃm, ‡m{brZ, ‡m{Q>rZ, ‚b{dZm∞BS≤>g Am°a<br />

Ob ‡`m{J j_Vm [m`r J`r$& Bg H|$– _| ‡OoZV _ycd•ßV$ Ama Q>r-3 Am°a Ama Q>r-4 _| 60 VWm 66.7 ‡oVeV<br />

g\$bVm ÒWm[Z _| [m`r J`r Om{ oH$ BZH{$ [°ÃH$ _ycd•ßV g{ AoYH$ Wr$& o[N>b{ dfm~ H{$ ‡OZZ H$m`©H´$_ g{ ‡mflV H$B©<br />

gßH$am| H$m VmO{ \$b Am°a _oXam C[`m{J H{$ obE _yÎ`mßH$Z oH$`m J`m$& odo^fi ÒWmZm| g{ gßJ´ohV Wm∞_gZ grS>b°g<br />

Am°a Cgg{ oZH$b{ ∑bm{Zm| H$m _m`H´$m{g{Q>{bmBQ> Am∞p dH$ _mH©$a g{ A‹``Z oH$`m J`m Am°a H$B© ‡oVH•$oV ∑bm{Z H$s<br />

[hMmZ H$s J`r Om{ ]{hVa OZZ–Ï` ‡]ßYZ _| ghm`H$ hm{Jr & _m∞ob∑`yba A‹``Z g{ ‡m· odemc AmßH$∂S>m| H{$ gßM`<br />

Am°a BÒV{_mb H{$ obE H$Âfl`yQ>a AmYmnaV S>{Q>m]{g H$m odH$mg oH$`m Om ahm h°$&<br />

AßJya H$s ‡_wI \ß$\y$X am{J, S>mCZr o_ÎS>Áy ‡oVam{oYH$Vm g{ Ow∂S>{ _mH©$a H$s [hMmZ H{$ obE AmdÌ`H$ [m°Ym<br />

gm_J´r odH$ogV H$aZ{ H{$ obE gßd{Xr bm{H$o‡` oH$Ò_| Wm∞_gZ grS>b°g Am°a ‚b{_ grS>b°g H$m g{d{B© odbmS>© Am°a<br />

gr]{b Zm_H$ ‡oVam{Yr gßH$am| H{$ gmW ‡OZZ oH$`m J`m$& Bg am{J H{$ ‡oV odo^fi ÒVa<strong>r`</strong> ‡oVam{Yr Am°a gßd{Xr<br />

Mdmbrg ‡odoapple>`m| H$m 24 ‡mB_a H{$ gmW odÌb{fU oH$`m J`m$& \$sZm{Q>mB[ Am°a OrZm{Q>mB[ AmßH$∂S>m| H{$ gmßpª`H$s<br />

odÌb{fU _| Bg JwU g{ Ow∂S>{ VrZ gß^modV _mH©$a ]°›S> H$s [hMmZ H$s J`r$& BZ _mH©$a ]°›S> H$m{ Eobb Ò[{ngo\$H$<br />

_mH©$a ]ZmZ{ H{$ obE ‡`mg oH$E JE$&<br />

\$gb CÀ[mXZ<br />

EH$ VZm H{$ _wH$m]b{ o¤ VZm Q≠>{qZJ [’oV _| ‡À`mam{n[V Vme-E-JU{e _| AoYH$ Jw¿N>m ZÂ]a/]{b, Jw¿N>m<br />

| iii |


NRC <strong>for</strong> <strong>Grapes</strong> | Annual Report 2006-07<br />

dOZ, 50 _oU dOZ, _oU Ï`mg Am°a [°Xmdma/]{b [m`r J`r$& Bgr ‡H$ma Vme-E-JU{e _| ojoVO g_mZmßVa<br />

pÒWoV H{$ _wH$m]b{ C‹d© pÒWoV _| VZm AoYH$ \$bXma W{$& A›` _ycd•ßV H{$ _wH$m]b{ 110 Ama [a H$bo_V Vme-E-<br />

JU{e H$m oZd[mXZ ]{hVa Wm$&<br />

A›` _ycd•ßV H{$ _wH$m]b{ 110 Ama [a ‡À`mam{o[V Wm∞_gZ grS>b°g _| erK´ H$br Ò\w$Q>Z [m`m J`m$& EH$ [Œmr<br />

AdÒWm [a S>m∞JarO [a gdm©oYH$ Ob ‡`m{J j_Vm [m`r JB©$& 110 Ama _ybd•ßV [a ‡À`mam{o[V Wm∞_gZ grS>b°g _|<br />

gdm©oYH$ Jw¿N> gߪ`m Am°a ‡oV ]{b [°Xmda [m`r J`r b{oH$Z Jw¿N>m dOZ, _oU Ï`mg Am°a _oU bÂ]mB© S>m∞JarO [a<br />

‡À`mam{o[V Wm∞_gZ grS>b°g _| o_br$& 1613 gr [a ‡À`mam{o[V Wm∞_gZ grS>b°g _| A›` _ycd•ßV H{$ _wH$m]b{ H$_<br />

"q[H$ ]°ar' [m`r J`r Om{ oH$ og\©$ 25-30% Wr O] oH$ A›` _ycd•ßV _| 70-80% Jw¿N>m| [a "q[H$ ]{ar' H$m ‡^md<br />

[m`m J`m$& Veraison g{ [hb{ H°$pÎg`_ ∑bm{amB©S> H{$ oN>∂S>H$md g{ aßJ odH$mg _{ß H$_r [m`r J`r$&<br />

N>Q>mB© H{$ Z„]{ oXZ ]mX 110 Ama Am°a S>m∞JarO [a ‡À`mam{o[V Wm∞_gZ grS>b°g _| AoYH$ [m{Q>°oe`_ H$s _mÃm<br />

Wr Om{ BZ _ycd•ßV H$s ]{hVa [m{fU ‡`m{J j_Vm Xem©Vm h°$& S>m∞JarO Am°a gmÎQ> H´$sH$ H{$ _wH$m]b{ 110 Ama [a<br />

‡À`mam{o[V Wm∞_gZ grS>b°g _| gm{oS>`_ H$s _mÃm _| _hÀd[yU© H$_r [m`r J`r gmW hr gdm©oYH$ C[O ^r [m`m J`r$&<br />

`h [naUm_ Bg _ycd•ßV H$s jma<strong>r`</strong> o_Q≤>Q>r _| AZwHy$bVm H$m{ Xem©V{ h¢$& ‡À`mam{o[V ]{bm| H{$ _wH$m]b{ Òd:OS> ]{bm| H$s<br />

[U©d•ßŒmm{ _| oO›H$ H$s _mÃm _| _hÀd[yU© AoYH$Vm Wr$& AWm©V Òd:OS> ]{bm| _| oO›H$ ‡`m{J H$s Xa _| ]Xbmd H$s<br />

AmdÌ`H$Vm h°$&<br />

AßJya H{$ O∂S> j{Ã Am°a J°a O∂S> j{Ã$o_Q≤>Q>r g{ [•W∑H$sH•$V JE EÒ[aOrbg H{$ ]mah AmBgm{b{Q> Z{ ‡`m{Jembm H{$<br />

‡`m{Jm| _| _hÀd[yU© ÒVa [a \$m∞Ò\{$Q> Kwbmd oH$`m$&<br />

odo^fi _oUd•o’ AdÒWmAm| [a oO]a°obH$ AÂb (OrE3) VWm gr [r [r `y H{$ ‡`m{Jg{ _oU JwUdŒmm _|<br />

_hÀd[yU© AßVa [m`m J`m$& [naUm_m| H{$ gÀ`m[Z H{$ obE ‡`m{J Omar h¢$&<br />

\$gb gßajU<br />

_{›S>r‡m{[mo_S> 0.8-1.0 o_br/br H$m EH$, _{›S>r‡m{[mo_S> A _|H$m{O{] 2 J´m/br H$m EH$ Am°a _{Q>mb{p∑Ob A<br />

_|H$m{O{] 2.5 J´m/br H{$ Xm{ oN>∂S>H$md g{ S>mCZr o_ÎS>Áy H$m CÀH•$Ô> oZ`ßÃU o_bm$& _mà _{Q>mb{p∑Ob `m oQ>_m{a{∑g<br />

Jm{ÎS> H{$ ‡`m{J H{$ _wH$m]b{ oQ>_m{a{∑g Jm{ÎS> H{$ ]mX _{Q>mb{p∑Ob H{$ oN>∂S>H$md g{ S>mCZr o_ÎS>Áy H$m ]{hVa oZ`ßÃU<br />

h˛Am$& EßW´{H$Zm{O H{$ oZ`ßÃU H{$ obE 0.615 J´m_/br H$s Xa g{ Wm`m{\$sZ{Q> o_WmBb H{$ oN>∂S>H$md CoMV [mE JE$&<br />

oQ>_m{a{∑g H{$ ]mX h{∑OmH$m{ZmOm{b H{$ oN>∂S>H$md g{ [mCS>ar o_ÎS>Áy H$s A¿N>r am{H$Wm_ h˛B©$& \$b ÒWm[Z H{$ ]mX<br />

_°flQ>mBboS>Zm{H{$[ H{$ Mma oN>∂S>H$md g{ [Œmr Am°a Jw¿N>m| [a [mCS>ar o_ÎS>Áy H$s A¿N>r am{H$Wm_ h˛B©$&<br />

Zmam`UJmßd Am°a qXXm{ar (ZmogH$) _| EH$ g{ [m±M dfv` AßJya ]mJmZm| _| AßJya br\$ am°b g{ Ow∂S>{ dmBag H{$<br />

bjU X{I{ J`{$& Eobgm (ELISA) [arjU _| dmBag H$s [woÔ> H$s J`r$& AßJya ]mJmZm| g{ EH$ ‡oVam{Yr `rÒQ> Am°a EH$<br />

Ep∑Q>Zm{_mBgrQ> H$m [•W∑H$sH$aU oH$`m J`m$&<br />

AßJya ]mJ _| H$sQ> [aOrod`m| H$m _m°g_r AmH´$_U H$m _m°g_ _m[X S>m{ H{$ gmW ghgÂ]›Y H$m A‹``Z oH$`m$&<br />

oW´flg Am°a O°ogS> H$s gdm©oYH$ gߪ`m Zdß]a-oXgß]a AWm©V [wÓ[Z AdÒWm g{ AmapÂ^H$ _oU ÒWm[Zm AdÒWm _|<br />

[m`r J`r$& _rbr]J H$s gdm©oYH$ gߪ`m \$b VwS>mB© AdÒWm [a VWm ‚br ]rQ>Îg H$s gߪ`m Zdß]a H{$ [hb{ g·mh _|<br />

gdm©oYH$ Wr$& OZdar - \$adar H{$ Xm°amZ _mBQ≤>g H$s AoYH$ gߪ`m [m`r J`r$&<br />

| iv |


_hmamÔ≠> Am°a Am›Y´ ‡X{e H{$ AßJya CÀ[mXZ j{Ãm| _| _rbr]J H$s Xm{ _wª` OmoV`m± _∞H$m{Z∞obH$m{H$g ohagyQ>g<br />

Am°a Ò`yS>m{H$m{H$g ogQ≠>r [m`r J`r$& gmW hr _rbr]ΩO g{ OwS>r MtQ>r H$s AmR> ‡OmoV`m| H$s [hMmZ H$s J`r$& Bgr<br />

‡H$ma oW´flg H$s Xm{ _wª` OmoV`m± _hÀd[yU© [m`r J`r$& AßJya H$m{ _wª` ZwH$gmZ [h߲MmZ{ dmbr _mBQ> H$s bmb _H$∂S>r<br />

Q>{Q≠>moZH$g AmoQ>©gr H{$ Í$[ _| [hMmZ H$s J`r$&<br />

H$B© ZB© [rT>r H{$ H$sQ>Zmer O°g pÒ[Zm{g°S>, ]w‡m\{$oOZ, _{Wm{o_b, Bo_S>m∑bm{o‡S>, Wm`o_Wm{∑O_,<br />

∑bm{Wm`oZoS>Z, o\$‡m{oZb, ∑bm{a[m`na\$m{g Am°a S>mB∑bm{adm{g, O°doZ`ßÃH$maH$ oH´$flQ>m{ob_g _m∞›Q≠>moOar H{$ obE<br />

gwaojV [mE JE $& AV: BZ agm`Zm| H$m{ EH$sH•$V H$sQ> ‡]ßYZ _| ‡`m{J oH$`m Om gH$Vm h°$&<br />

AßJya _| „`y[am{\{$oµOZ Am°a pÒ[Zm{g{S> AdoeÔ> H$s —∂T>Vm H$m A‹``Z oH$`m J`m Am°a BZ agm`Zm| H{$ obE H$Q>mB©<br />

[yd© AdoY H´$_e: 40 Am°a 8 oXZ oZYm©naV H$s J`r$& \$m{a∑bm{a\{$›`yam∞Z Am°a Wm`o_Wm{∑µO_ H$s C[pÒWoV _| _•Xm<br />

E›OmB_ H{$ A‹``Z g{ [Vm Mbm oH$ ogµ\$mnae _mÃm [a BZ agm`Zm| H$m _•Xm _| O°odH$ oH´$`mAm| [a H$m{B© ‡oVHy$b<br />

‡^md Zht hm{Vm$& BZ agm`Zm| H$m Adem{fU A‹``Z _| \$m{a∑bm{a\{$›`yam{Z H$_ g{ _‹`_ brqMJ gm_œ`© Am°a<br />

Wm`o_Wm{∑O_ _‹`_ g{ CÉ brqMJ gm_œ`©dmbm agm`Z [m`m J`m$&<br />

H$Q>mB© g{ Vrg oXZ [hb{ H$s AdoY _| Q≠>mBH$m{S>_m© H{$ oN>∂S>H$md g{ ‚bwogbmOm{b H{$ obE H$Q>mB© [yd© AdoY 48<br />

oXZ g{ H$_ hm{H$a 18 oXZ ah J`r$&<br />

‡m°⁄m{oJH$s Am°a gyMZm ÒWmZmßVaU<br />

‡oejU H$m`©H´$_, ‡j{Ã Xe©Z, g{o_Zma Am°a AßJya CÀ[mXH$m| H{$ gmW [maÒ[mnaH$ ]mVMrV ¤mam ‡m°⁄m{oJH$s<br />

Am°a gyMZm ÒWmZmßVaU Bg H{$›– H$m EH$ _hÀd[yU© Am°a Aod^m¡` H$m`© H$bm[ h°$& EH$sH•$V am{J Edß [m{fU ‡]ßY<br />

VWm CÓU H$oQ>]ßYr j{Ãm| _{ß AßJya CÀ[mXZ _| CfiV odf`m| [a Am`m{oOV ‡oejU H$m`©H´$_mß H$m{ ]h˛V gamhZm o_br$&<br />

odo^fi am¡`m| H{$ AßJya CÀ[mXH$ gßKQ>Zm| ¤mam A`m{oOV g{o_Zma Am°a ‡j{Ã Xe©Z ¤mam H{$›– _| odH$ogV VH$ZrH$m| H$m{<br />

CÀ[mXH$m| VH$ [h±˛Om`m J`m$& Bg H|$– H{$ d°kmoZH$m| H$m{ odo^fi gßÒWmAm| H{$ ‡oejU H$m`©H´$_m| _| Ûm{V Ï`o∫$ H{$ Í$[<br />

_| ]wbm`m J`m$& H|$– g{ AZ{H$ VH$ZrH$s ]wb{oQ>Z Am°a bm{H$o‡` b{I ‡H$moeV h˛E h¢$&<br />

_mZd gßgmYZ odH$mg<br />

Xm{ d°kmoZH$ Am°a Xm{ odŒm Edß b{Im AoYH$mna`m| H$m{ CZH{$ j{Ã _| ZB© OmZH$ar hmogb H$aZ{ H{$ obE odo^fi<br />

gßÒWmZm| _| ^{Om J`m$& H$B© d°kmoZH$m| Z{ amÔ≠><strong>r`</strong> A›Vam©Ô≠><strong>r`</strong> gÂ_{bZm| Am°a H$m`©embmAm| _{ ^mJ b{H$a A[Zm kmZ<br />

]T>m`m$&<br />

amOÒd Am`<br />

oZYm©naV b˙` 40 bmI Í$[`{ H{$ _wH$m]b{ H{$›– Z{ 40.19 bmI Í$[`{ H$s amOÒd Am` AoO©V H$s & `h amOÒd<br />

Am` ‡oejU, gbmh, AZw]p›YV AZwgßYmZ Am°a g{dmE±, \$m_© CÀ[mX Am°a [m°Y gm_J´r ]{M H$a h˛B©$&<br />

^mdr ‡oV]b j{Ã<br />

AmZ{ dmb{ dfm~ _| _oXam AßJya CÀ[mXZ H{$ obE ‡m°⁄m{oJH$s H$m odH$mg, [aOrdr ZmeH$ AdoeÔ> _mÃm _| H$_r,<br />

[`m©daU, AZwHy$b ‡m°⁄m{oJH$s H$m odH$mg Am°a O°d ‡m°⁄m{oJH$s, AZwgßYmZ H{$ H|$– o]›Xw hm|J{$&<br />

<br />

H$m`©H$mar gmamße<br />

| v |


Executive Summary<br />

<strong>National</strong> <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Centre</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Grapes</strong> was established in 1997 with the mandate to undertake<br />

mission-oriented programme involving basic and strategic research <strong>for</strong> resolving the major biotic and<br />

abiotic constraints affecting the grapes production, productivity and utilization. To achieve this,<br />

research is carried out in the broad areas of crop improvement, crop production, crop protection and<br />

post harvest technology.<br />

During one decade of its establishment, the <strong>Centre</strong> has progressed by leaps and bounds.<br />

Excellent infrastructure is developed during last five years and the laboratories are now equipped with<br />

modern and sophisticated equipments. Several agencies specially APEDA and DBT have funded<br />

research projects. The <strong>Centre</strong>'s contribution towards progress of grape industry in the country was<br />

recognised at different <strong>for</strong>a. Excellent ef<strong>for</strong>ts of this <strong>Centre</strong> as <strong>National</strong> Referral Laboratory resulted<br />

in considerable reduction in pesticide residues in export grapes during last four years as compared to<br />

2003-04 as the first year of the programme. This is also helping in reduction of pesticide use in<br />

domestic production.<br />

Besides 15 institute programmes, which were <strong>for</strong>mulated after thorough understanding of the<br />

growers' need and refined time to time after recommendations of the RAC and SRC, research was<br />

carried out under 1 DBT, 3 APEDA and 1 ICAR Network project and also undertook several contract<br />

research and consultancy projects. The salient achievements of the Institute during 2006-07 are<br />

given below:<br />

Crop Improvement<br />

Two clonal selections identified by the farmers were collected and added to national grape<br />

germplasm repository. Field screening of germplasm identified few accessions with single or multiple<br />

disease resistance. Few accessions were resistant to all the three major diseases. Accessions showing<br />

resistance to thrips were also identified. Rootstocks were characterised <strong>for</strong> their physico-chemical<br />

properties. Highest phenol content, proline, proteins, flavonoid and water use efficiency was<br />

observed in rootstocks belonging to Berlandieri × Rupestris crosses. The rootstocks bred at the<br />

Institute viz. RT4 and RT3 established better than their parents with 66.7 per cent and 60.0 percent<br />

of success in establishment, respectively. Several promising hybrids obtained from previous years<br />

crosses were evaluated <strong>for</strong> their suitability <strong>for</strong> table and wine purpose. 24 Thompson Seedless clones<br />

were analysed with RAPD and microsatellite primers and several duplicates were identified. A<br />

computer based molecular database has been developed.<br />

Commercially popular varieties viz. Thompson Seedless and Flame Seedless were crossed with<br />

Sevye Villard and Seibel (downy mildew resistant varieties) to obtain segregating population <strong>for</strong><br />

tagging downy mildew resistance in grapes. 44 accessions showing varying level of resistance and<br />

susceptibility to downy mildew were analysed with 24 more microsatellite primers. Multiple<br />

regression analysis of phenotypic and genotype data identified three promising bands showing<br />

association with this trait. These marker bands were cloned and sequenced. The primer was<br />

redesigned to develop allele specific marker.<br />

Crop production<br />

The yield per<strong>for</strong>mance of grafted Tas-A-Ganesh in terms of average number of bunches/vine,<br />

bunch weight, berry weight, berry diameter and yield per vine was better on double stem as<br />

compared to the single stem training system. Similarly vertically positioned shoots in Tas-A-Ganesh<br />

were found to be more fruitful as compared to horizontally placed.<br />

| vi |


Executive Summary<br />

Tas-A-Ganesh grafted on 110 R per<strong>for</strong>med better than those grafted on other rootstocks in<br />

term of early bud sprouting, berry length and its weight. Similarly, Thomson Seedless grafted on<br />

110R sprouted early compare to those on other rootstocks.<br />

Water use efficiency at single leaf level was maximum on Dogridge followed by those on 110R,<br />

1103P and 99R. Significant difference was observed <strong>for</strong> the yield and quality parameters where<br />

110R rootstock recorded highest number of bunches and yield per vine. However, average bunch<br />

weight, berry diameter and berry length was higher on Dogridge as compared to 110R and other<br />

rootstocks.<br />

Least pink berry incidence (25-30 %) was observed in Thompson Seedless grafted on 1613 C<br />

rootstocks followed by own rooted vines. While on the other rootstocks like Dogridge, 110 R, 1103<br />

P, St. George, SO-4, 99 R, the incidence ranged from 70-80 %. Application of calcium chloride<br />

reduced the pink colour development significantly.<br />

Thompson Seedless grafted on 110R and Dogridge contained higher K content at 90 days after<br />

pruning indicating their better nutrient use efficiency. Significantly less Na content was found in<br />

Thompson Seedless vines raised on 110R rootstock as compared to Dogridge and Salt Creek<br />

suggesting its suitability <strong>for</strong> use in case of saline soils. The highest yield was also obtained on this<br />

rootstock.<br />

The concentration of the zinc was significantly more in petioles of own rooted compared to<br />

grafted vines indicating that the own rooted vines may require different rates of zinc applications.<br />

Twelve Aspergillus isolates from the rhizosphere and non- rhizosphere soils of the grapevines<br />

showed significant P solubilization in vitro studies.<br />

The significant differences were recorded in berry quality with the differential application of<br />

GA 3 and CPPU at various stages of berry growth. For con<strong>for</strong>mity of results experiment is in<br />

progress.<br />

Crop protection<br />

Four Sprays of Mandipropamid 250 SC, 0.8 - 1.0 ml/L; (Mandipropamid + mancozeb) 65<br />

WG, 2.0 g/L; (Metalaxyl M + mancozeb) 68 WP (Ridomil Gold), 2.5 g/L; (Metalaxyl M + mancozeb)<br />

68 WG, 2.5 g/L showed an excellent control of downy mildew after April pruning and retained<br />

leaves till October. Timorex Gold (24% Australian tea tree oil) sprays followed by Metalaxyl Sprays<br />

showed better control of downy mildew as compared to sprays of metalaxyl alone and Timorex Gold<br />

alone. Four Sprays of Thiophanate methyl with 70 WP, 0.615 g/L showed good control of<br />

anthracnose and moderate control of powdery mildew till October. Timorex Sprays followed by<br />

hexaconazole sprays showed better control of powdery mildew than spays of hexaconazole or<br />

Timorex Gold alone. Four Sprays of meptyldinocap 35 EC, 0.309 - 0.343 ml/L after fruit set were<br />

found to be good <strong>for</strong> controlling powdery mildew on leaves as well as bunches. One antagonist yeast<br />

and an actinomyetes were isolated from the vineyard.<br />

Seasonal incidence of insect pests in grape vineyards and their correlation with weather<br />

parameters was studied. Thrips and jassids were observed during November-December, which<br />

coincided with flowering period to early berry setting period. Mealybug incidence was recorded<br />

highest during harvesting (March-April). Flea beetle population was highest in first week of<br />

November. High incidence of Red Spider mites (Tetranychus urticae) was noticed during late winter<br />

and early summer months of January-February in Nasik.<br />

| vii |


NRC <strong>for</strong> <strong>Grapes</strong> | Annual Report 2006-07<br />

M. hirsutus and P. citri were found to be the major species of mealy bug in grape growing<br />

regions of Maharashtra and Andhra Pradesh. Eight species of ants were found associated with the<br />

mealybugs in the vineyards. Similarly two major species of thrips were found to be of economic<br />

importance. The mite causing the damage to grapes was identified as red spider mite Tetranychus<br />

urticae.<br />

Several new generation insecticides like spinosad, buprofezin, methomyl, imidacloprid,<br />

thiamethoxam, clothianidin, fipronil, chlorpyriphos and dichlorvos were found to be effective in<br />

managing various insects and pests and safe <strong>for</strong> Cryptolaemus montrouzieri and there<strong>for</strong>e, could<br />

be integrated in the IPM package.<br />

Persistence of buprofezin and spinosad residues in grapes was studied and their PHI was<br />

estimated to be 40 days and 8 days, respectively. Study on enzyme activity of soil born microflora in<br />

presence of <strong>for</strong>chlorfenuron and thiamethoxam indicated that these chemicals pose no threat to soil<br />

biological activity at recommended dose. Sorption studies of these chemicals in soils categorised<br />

Forchlorfenuron as a chemical with low to medium leaching potential and Thiamethoxam as medium<br />

to high leaching potential.<br />

Sprays of Trichoderma during the last 30 days be<strong>for</strong>e harvest reduced the PHI of flusilazole<br />

from 48 days to 18 days.<br />

Transfer of Technology<br />

Transfer of technology and in<strong>for</strong>mation through training programmes, field visits, seminars, and<br />

interaction with the grower is an important and integral activity of the Institute. Training programmes<br />

on integrated pest and nutrient management, and advances in tropical viticulture received enormous<br />

response from the growers. Technologies developed during the last few years were transferred to the<br />

growers through frequent field visits, organizing training programmes at the Institute and<br />

participating in the seminars organized by the grape growers associations of different States. The<br />

scientists of the Institute were frequently invited as resource persons <strong>for</strong> training programmes<br />

organized by other organizations like growers' associations / societies, State Govts., etc. The <strong>Centre</strong><br />

published several technical bulletins, leaflets and popular articles in local language during the period.<br />

Human resource development<br />

Two scientists and two Finance and Accounts officials were trained in their respective areas of<br />

work by deputing them to professional institutes in the country. Several scientists participated in<br />

international and national symposia and workshops to update their knowledge in their respective<br />

fields.<br />

Revenue generation<br />

Gross revenue of Rs. 40.19 lakhs was generated against the target of Rs. 40.00 lakhs through<br />

training, consultancy, contract research and services and sale of planting material and farm produce<br />

and interest on term deposit receipts during the period of work.<br />

Future thrust<br />

Development of technologies <strong>for</strong> wine grapes, minimization of pesticide residues, development<br />

environment friendly technologies, sustaining the present yield and improving the quality of produce<br />

will be the focus of research in coming years.<br />

<br />

| viii |


Introduction<br />

The <strong>National</strong> <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Centre</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Grapes</strong> started functioning in Pune at Manjri, from 18 th January<br />

1997 has completed a decade of its establishment. Spread over an area of 46.78 ha of land the<br />

<strong>Centre</strong> functions from its Laboratory-cum-Administrative building. A total area of about 32 acre has<br />

been planted with Dogridge rootstock, of which 6 acre has been grafted with Thompson seedless and<br />

Tas-A-Ganesh cultivars <strong>for</strong> various experimental trials and 415 indigenous and exotic spp./varieties/<br />

hybrids etc. to establish the germplasm repository. Extended 'Y' trellises <strong>for</strong> training the vines to flat<br />

roof gable and drip irrigation/fertigation facilities have been established. Two acres of vineyard is<br />

grafted with newly introduced commercially important table varieties to develop mother block <strong>for</strong><br />

supplying high quality planting material to the growers. Irrigation facilities have been augmented time<br />

to time to meet the water requirement <strong>for</strong> additional vineyards. A polyhouse, glasshouse and FRP<br />

houses have been constructed to maintain seedlings and conducting experiments under controlled<br />

conditions. The development of another 20 acres of vineyards mainly <strong>for</strong> wine grapes is under<br />

progress.<br />

Mandate<br />

To undertake the programmes covering basic and strategic research <strong>for</strong> resolving the major<br />

biotic and abiotic constraints affecting the grapes quality production, productivity, to sustain the<br />

productivity, promote diversification towards wine and other value added products and<br />

evaluation of technologies <strong>for</strong> developing region specific technologies.<br />

Thrust areas of research<br />

• Eco-region specific technology generation and extension in continuation<br />

• Enhancement of water productivity and nutrient use efficiency.<br />

• Climate change and management of stresses.<br />

• Value-added product development, food safety and quality assurance.<br />

• Bio-remediation, Bio-fertilization, Bio-molecules, Bio-<strong>for</strong>tification, Bio-safety, Bio-security, and<br />

Biosensors.<br />

• IT-based decision support systems <strong>for</strong> technology transfer<br />

| 1 |


NRC <strong>for</strong> <strong>Grapes</strong> | Annual Report 2006-07<br />

Quinquennial Review Team<br />

<strong>Research</strong> Advisory Committee<br />

Institute <strong>Research</strong> Committee<br />

Director<br />

Institute Management Committee<br />

Joint Staff Council<br />

Administration<br />

and Finance &<br />

Accounts<br />

Farm<br />

Management,<br />

Estate<br />

<strong>Research</strong> and<br />

Transfer of<br />

Technology<br />

PME /<br />

Technical<br />

Cell<br />

Technical Services:<br />

ARIS, OLIC, IPR, IRGS,<br />

Publications, etc.<br />

Library<br />

Grape<br />

Improvement<br />

Grape<br />

Production<br />

Grape<br />

Protection<br />

Postharvest<br />

Technology <strong>for</strong> <strong>Grapes</strong><br />

Financial statement<br />

Sl.<br />

No.<br />

Heads<br />

(Rs. in Lakhs)<br />

R. E. 2006-07 Expenditure 2006-07 Final Grant Revenue<br />

Plan Non-Plan Plan Non-Plan Plan Non-Plan Generated<br />

1. Estt. Charges 0.00 83.70 0.00 83.70 0.00 83.70<br />

2. O.T.A. 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.10<br />

3. T.A. 3.00 1.50 3.00 1.50 3.00 1.50<br />

4. Other charges 121.40 54.40 121.40 54.40 121.40 54.40<br />

5. Works 125.91 8.00 125.91 8.00 125.91 8.00<br />

Total 250.31 147.70 250.31 147.70 250.31 147.70 40.19 *<br />

* Revenue of Rs. 40.19 lakhs was generated against the target of Rs. 40.00 lakhs through training, consultancy,<br />

contract research and services and sale of planting material and farm produce and interest on term deposit receipts.<br />

Staff position<br />

Sl.<br />

No.<br />

Post<br />

Number of posts<br />

Sanctioned Filled Vacant<br />

1. <strong>Research</strong> & Management Personnel 1 1 0<br />

2. Scientific 16 13 3<br />

3. Technical 8 8 0<br />

4. Administrative 9 9 0<br />

5. Supportive 7 7 0<br />

Total 41 38 3<br />

| 2 |


<strong>Research</strong> Achievements<br />

Programme 1.<br />

Management of genetic resources of grapes<br />

1.1 Collection and augmentation<br />

Two clonal selections one each from Sharad Seedless and Sonaka, reported by the farmers have<br />

been collected. The salient features of these selections as reported by farmers and our own<br />

observations from growers' vineyards are presented in table 1.<br />

Table 1. Salient features of new clonal selections<br />

Selection<br />

Yield<br />

(tons<br />

ha -1 )<br />

Bunch<br />

shape<br />

Bunch<br />

weight<br />

(g)<br />

Berry<br />

colour<br />

Berry<br />

shape<br />

Berry<br />

weight<br />

(g)<br />

TSS<br />

(°brix)<br />

Acidity<br />

(%)<br />

Remarks<br />

Mutant of 28.0 Shouldered, 850- Purple Elliptical 10-14 g 22.0 0.55 Responds<br />

Sharad Conical 1200 Black well to GA<br />

Seedless<br />

and CPPU<br />

(Accession<br />

No. B2-43-6)<br />

Mutant of 22.0 Cylindrical 350- Cream Elongated 4-7 g 23.0 0.60 Responds<br />

Sonaka 550 white and well to GA<br />

(Accession<br />

arched<br />

No. A2-8-5)<br />

A2-8-5<br />

(Mutant of Sonaka)<br />

1.2 Characterization, documentation and cataloguing<br />

1.2.1 Physio biochemical analysis of rootstocks<br />

Ten rootstocks namely Dogridge, B2-56, DeGrasset, 110R, 99 R, 1103 P, Teleki 5A, St. George,<br />

V. champinii and Salt Creek were characterized based on various physiological and biochemical<br />

parameters. Total phenolic content was low in DeGrasset, St. George, Salt Creek and Vitis<br />

champinii, high in 99 R, 1103 P, Dogridge and 110R and moderate in Teleki 5A and B2-56.<br />

Proline, proteins and flavonoids were recorded high in V. berlandieri × V. rupestris crosses followed<br />

| 3 |


NRC <strong>for</strong> <strong>Grapes</strong> | Annual Report 2006-07<br />

by V. champinii group and least was in V. rupestris spp and V. riparia. Reducing sugar content was<br />

maximum in Teleki 5A and minimum in 110 R rootstock.<br />

Water use efficiency was maximum in V.berlandieri and V.rupestris crosses followed by other<br />

species like V.champinii, V. riparia and V. rupestris. Rooting percent was high in 110 R, 99 R,<br />

1103 P, St. George, moderate in Dogridge, Salt Creek, B2-56 and least in Teleki 5A. Optimum C/N<br />

ratio in mother vines correlated with maximum success rate in rooting. Significant and positive<br />

correlation was observed between rooting success and total proteins and water use efficiency (WUE),<br />

while negative correlation was observed between rooting success and total phenolic content. Similarly<br />

total proline content and water use efficiency had positive correlation (Table 2).<br />

Table 2. Correlation matrix of rooting success with some biochemical and physiological parameters in<br />

rootstocks.<br />

Sucess % Phenols R. Sugars Proline Protien WUE C/N ratio<br />

Success % 1.00 -0.68* -0.16 0.23 0.72* 0.71* -0.47<br />

Phenols 1.00 0.16 0.13 0.84** 0.78** -0.37<br />

R. Sugars 1.00 -0.49 -0.23 -0.27 -0.54<br />

Proline 1.00 0.47 0.54* 0.69*<br />

Protein 1.00 0.88** -0.13<br />

WUE 1.00 -0.17<br />

C/N ratio 1.00<br />

* Significant at 5%, ** Significant at 1%<br />

1.2.2 Screening of rootstocks <strong>for</strong> propagation through hardwood cuttings<br />

Twenty rootstock varieties (Table 3) maintained and few developed at the <strong>Centre</strong> were tested <strong>for</strong> their<br />

rootability and establishment in soil under polyhouse conditions and data is presented in table 3.<br />

Maximum number of plants were established in 1616C (82.5%), followed by St. George (80%),<br />

Ramsey, 99R, 1613C (75% each) and Dogridge (72.7%). The rootstocks bred at the <strong>Centre</strong> RT4<br />

and RT3 were established better than their parents (Teleki 5A x SO4) with 66.7 per cent and 60.0<br />

percent of success, respectively.<br />

| 4 |


<strong>Research</strong> Achievements<br />

Table 3. Comparison of different rootstocks <strong>for</strong> establishment<br />

Sl. No. Name of Rootstock Cutting planted Percentage sucess<br />

1. 99 Richter 100 75.0<br />

2. 1616 Couderc 80 82.5<br />

3. V. champini 50 60.0<br />

4. Dogridge 55 72.7<br />

5. Ramsey (Salt Creek) 100 75.0<br />

6. 110 Richter 70 50.0<br />

7. Teleki-5A 70 42.8<br />

8. Freedom 150 66.7<br />

9. RT-3(Teleki 5A x SO4) (B2-66/67) 50 60.0<br />

10. 41B 50 70.0<br />

11. deGrasset 80 50.0<br />

12. 140 Ruggeri 68 70.6<br />

13. 161- 49 Couderc 50 44.0<br />

14. SO-4 70 51.4<br />

15. B2-56 100 40.0<br />

16. 1103 Paulsen 100 32.0<br />

17. V. longii 80 62.5<br />

18. 1613 Couderc 160 75.0<br />

19. St. George 125 80.0<br />

20. RT-4 (Teleki 5A x SO-4) 75 66.7<br />

1.3 Screening of grape germplasm <strong>for</strong> biotic and abiotic stress<br />

1.3.1 Screening <strong>for</strong> resistance to major diseases<br />

Field screening of grape varieties against major grape diseases<br />

All the accessions in the core germplasm collection of the <strong>Centre</strong> were screened in vivo <strong>for</strong> resistance<br />

to the three important diseases viz. downy mildew, powdery mildew and anthracnose during natural<br />

epiphytotic conditions. The ratings were recorded on 1-9 scale as proposed by UPOV. Some<br />

accessions were found immune to downy mildew, anthracnose and powdery midlew were identified.<br />

Accessions with multiple resistant to powdery and anthracnose, downy and anthracnose, rust and<br />

anthracnose, downy mildew, powdery mildew and anthracnose were idetified. Further confimations<br />

will be done.<br />

In vitro screening of grape varieties and hybrids against downy mildew<br />

Sixteen Flame Seedless (FS) x Seyve Villard (SV) hybrids and 13 Thompson Seedless (TS) x SV<br />

hybrids were screened in vitro by leaf disc technique. Four FS x SV hybrids four rated resistant and<br />

one moderately resistant, while eight TS x SV hybrids were resistant and three moderately resistant.<br />

| 5 |


NRC <strong>for</strong> <strong>Grapes</strong> | Annual Report 2006-07<br />

1.5 Screening <strong>for</strong> wine and juice quality and yield<br />

Nine wine varieties (3 years age) were characterized <strong>for</strong> their juice characteristics to assess their<br />

suitability <strong>for</strong> wine making under tropical conditions. Among the 4 white varieties EC 27818 gave<br />

maximum yield (7.4 kg/vine), followed by Symphony and Sauvignon Blanc. Mean bunch weight was<br />

maximum in Symphony however, maximum juice yield was recorded in EC27818. Among the<br />

coloured varieties Shiraz gave maximum yield with good must quality comprises TSS (20 B), acidity<br />

(0.75%) and pH (3.10). Athens and Cabernet Sauvignon were good yielders with high TSS along<br />

with moderate acidity but slightly high pH (table 4).<br />

Table 4. Yield and Must characteristics of wine varieties at NRC <strong>for</strong> <strong>Grapes</strong><br />

Sl.<br />

No.<br />

Variety<br />

Yield<br />

per vine<br />

(kg)<br />

Mean<br />

bunch<br />

wt. (g)<br />

Juice<br />

(%)<br />

TSS<br />

(°brix)<br />

Acidity<br />

(%)<br />

pH<br />

Remarks<br />

1. EC 27818 (Yugoslavia) (w) 7.4 105 86 20.2 0.48 3.45 White<br />

2. Symphony (w) 5.5 210 52 19.0 0.67 3.40 White<br />

3. Chardonnay (w) 3.3 103 59 22.0 0.70 3.50 White<br />

4. Sauvignon Blanc (w) 4.9 165 54 22.0 0.84 3.10 White<br />

5. Cabernet Sauvignon 7.5 105 84 21.0 0.60 3.50 Red<br />

6. Merlot 5.5 195 68 20.8 0.70 3.60 Red<br />

7. Shiraz 8.7 205 84 20.0 0.75 3.30 Red<br />

8. Athens 8.0 165 74 20.0 0.71 3.50 Red<br />

9. Zinfandel 5.6 125 70 21.2 0.90 3.30 Rose<br />

CD at 5% 2.1 22 4.8 1.8 0.18 0.20<br />

Programme 2.<br />

Germplasm utilization and genetic enhancement<br />

2.2 Breeding <strong>for</strong> high production and quality<br />

2.2.1 Breeding <strong>for</strong> high production and quality in table grapes<br />

Hybrids obtained from crossings of previous year were field evaluated. The main features of some of<br />

the promising hybrids are as follows:<br />

1. Pusa Navrang x Flame Seedless-1 : Teinturier, late<br />

ripening medium berry size, crisp pulp, low seed content<br />

and muscat flavour. It has potential <strong>for</strong> 2 crops per year.<br />

2. Pusa Navrang x Flame Seedless-2 : Teinturier, bold<br />

berries, early ripening, muscat flavour.<br />

3. Pusa Navrang x Flame Seedless-3 : Bold berries,<br />

non-teinturier type brilliant red colour fruits, attractive<br />

bunch and berries. Crisp pulp and muscat flavour early<br />

ripening and has good keeping quality. Berry adherence<br />

is good and tolerant to berry splitting.<br />

Pusa Navrang x Flame Seedless<br />

| 6 |


<strong>Research</strong> Activities<br />

4. Vitis parviflora x Superior Seedless : Greenish, bold and seedless fruits, ripening is late,<br />

TSS 20°brix. It has distinct flavour unlike other vinifera grapes.<br />

5. Spin Sahebi x Sharad Seedless : Black seedless, medium bold berries, late ripening,<br />

excellent fruit quality with medium round berries. TSS<br />

20.2°brix and acidity 0.7%.<br />

6. Spin Sahebi x A 17-3 : Green seedless, medium bold,<br />

oval shaped, late ripening with attractive medium sized<br />

loose bunches. Fruit quality excellent and flavoured as<br />

that of male parent. Berry adherence is very good and<br />

berries have thick skin. TSS 20.2°brix and acidity 0.60%.<br />

7. Spin Sahebi x Crimson Seedless : Male sterile, straw<br />

green berries mostly seedless, bold and oval shaped.<br />

However, crossed / fertile berries show 1-2 seeds each.<br />

A late ripener and useful <strong>for</strong> cross breeding. TSS<br />

24.2°brix, acidity 0.7%.<br />

8. Katta Kurgan x Pusa Seedless : A late ripener.<br />

Bunch size 150 g, berries greenish transparent. TSS<br />

23.4°brix with low acidity of 0.42%.<br />

Spin Sahebi x A 17-3<br />

2.2.2 Breeding <strong>for</strong> high production and quality in wine grapes<br />

Wine variety Chardonnay was crossed with Pusa Navrang and Arkavati. The salient features of<br />

promising hybrids are as follows:<br />

1. Chardonnay x Pusa Navrang (White Early) : Uni<strong>for</strong>m early ripening at 110 DAP. TSS<br />

19.0°brix, average bunch size weighing 150 g. Good yielding potential.<br />

2. Chardonnay x Pusa Navrang (White medium) : Uni<strong>for</strong>m ripening at 120 DAP. Bunch<br />

weight is 250-310 g. TSS 20°brix, acidity 0.95%, pH 3.16. It has potential <strong>for</strong> 2 crops per year.<br />

3. Chardonnay x Pusa Navrang (Red Early) : Uni<strong>for</strong>m ripening, teinturier but flavoured<br />

berries. Ripening 115 DAP. TSS 19°brix, acidity 0.86%, pH 3.10.<br />

4. Chardonnay x Pusa Navrang (Red late) : Uni<strong>for</strong>m ripening,. 125 DAP, bunch is small and<br />

compact. TSS 18.0°brix with high acidity (1.5%) and has juice pH 2.9.<br />

5. Chardonnay x Arkavati-1 : Small bunch size (125 g) medium yielder, suited to high density<br />

planting. TSS 20°brix, acidity 0.7% and is late ripener (125 days DAP).<br />

6. Chardonnay x Arkavati-2 : Bold bunch size, good yielding (up to 12 kg/vine), fruits are slight<br />

pulpy, has low seed content. Vines have good canopy vigour.<br />

| 7 |


NRC <strong>for</strong> <strong>Grapes</strong> | Annual Report 2006-07<br />

7. Chardonnay x Arkavati-3 : Medium canopy vigour, very good<br />

yielding, uni<strong>for</strong>m ripening, Chardonnay like appearance of<br />

bunches and berries. It is suited to high density planting. It is a<br />

spur bearer.<br />

Chardonnay × Arkavati - 3<br />

2.3 Breeding <strong>for</strong> tolerance to biotic stress<br />

2.3.1 Breeding <strong>for</strong> downy mildew resistance<br />

A hybrid obtained through embryo rescue of Flame Seedless × Catawba cross was found promising.<br />

Berries are very small, seeded and crisp, bunches are loose, highly acidic and with muscat flavour.<br />

The vine is very vigorous and downy mildew tolerant and will be useful <strong>for</strong> further cross breeding.<br />

Ten different crosses were made using susceptible Flame Seedless and Thompson Seedless as male<br />

parents and resistant female parents such as SV-B2-25-III, SV B2-24-III, Seibel B2-32-II, Seibel B2-<br />

32-II and CBR (B2-14-III). About 7000 flowers were crossed out of which 3719 seeds were obtained.<br />

The progenies obtained will be used as segregating population <strong>for</strong> the identification of molecular<br />

markers linked with the downy mildew resistance.<br />

Programme 3.<br />

Application of biotechnological research in grapes<br />

3.1 Molecular tagging <strong>for</strong> commercially important traits<br />

3.1.1 Molecular tagging <strong>for</strong> downy mildew resistance in grape<br />

Microsatellite analysis of accessions<br />

Forty-four accessions were analysed with another 24 primers. However consistent results were<br />

obtained with only 18 primers. Thus this population has been analysed with 44 primers. Data <strong>for</strong> all<br />

the primers were scored and analysed. 44 primers detected a total of 433 alleles with an average of<br />

9.8 alleles per primer. The number of alleles detected by each primer ranged between 4-23<br />

(VVMD14).<br />

Microsatellite analysis of hybrids<br />

DNA from 44 hybrids was analysed with 4 micro satellite primers. Analysis with more primers,<br />

scoring and analysis is in progress.<br />

Structure analysis of accessions<br />

The microsatellite data was subjected to population structure analysis to estimate the number of<br />

populations in the studied material. Software STRUCTURE 2.1 was used with 100000 burnin length<br />

and 100000 run length. K value ranging from 1-8 was considered. The Ln probability of data was<br />

stabilized at 5 and a plateau was reached. There<strong>for</strong>e 5 populations were considered. All the<br />

susceptible accessions were grouped in one population whereas resistant accessions were distributed<br />

in several populations.<br />

| 8 |


<strong>Research</strong> Activities<br />

Association analysis<br />

i. Non parametric analysis<br />

Genotype data and field screening data of disease rating were analysed using non parametric test.<br />

The test compares means of two genotype classes. A total of 23 markers showed significant<br />

association with trait. 12 markers were present in resistant accessions whereas 11 were present in<br />

susceptible accession.<br />

ii. Regression analysis<br />

The significant markers present in resistant and susceptible accessions were separately subjected to<br />

multiple linear regression analysis. One susceptibility and one resistance marker was found to be the<br />

most significant with a R 2 value of 0.49 and 0.33 respectively.<br />

Cloning, sequencing and primer redesigning<br />

Three promising bands identified by non parametric and multiple regression analysis were excised<br />

from silver stained gel, reamplified, purified and cloned. The cloning was done in pGEM4 vector and<br />

trans<strong>for</strong>med into E. coli JM101 strain. The clones were sequenced and sequence data was used to<br />

design degenerate primers in an order to develop SCAR.<br />

3.3 Development of molecular techniques <strong>for</strong> variety and hybrid identification<br />

3.3.1 Analysis of genetic variation among clones of Thompson Seedless<br />

In an attempt to identify duplicate accessions and subsequently core collection <strong>for</strong> better germplasm<br />

management, vines of Thompson Seedless collected from different sources and its clones were<br />

analysed with eight microsatellite primers. The selected primers are highly polymorphic and<br />

probability of<br />

identical genotype<br />

<strong>for</strong> these primers is<br />

9.84 × 10 -14 .<br />

Several identical<br />

genotypes were<br />

identified. Variation<br />

was also detected <strong>for</strong><br />

many of the clones<br />

derived from<br />

Thompson Seedless.<br />

Figure 1 shows the<br />

difference in allelic<br />

pattern of 3 vines of<br />

Thompson Seedless.<br />

Fig. 1. Allele profile of 3 vines of Thompson Seedless <strong>for</strong> primer VVS2. Top - Thompson Seedless (France),<br />

Middle - Thompson Seedless (Italy) Bottom: Thompson Seedless (Cali<strong>for</strong>nia)<br />

| 9 |


NRC <strong>for</strong> <strong>Grapes</strong> | Annual Report 2006-07<br />

3.3.2 DNA profiling of important grape varieties <strong>for</strong> testing genetic purity<br />

Twenty eight commercially important varieties including rootstocks, wine varieties and table/raisin<br />

varieties were analyzed with six microsatellite primers and their allele profile was developed. This<br />

allele profile will be used <strong>for</strong> ascertaining their genetic purity at various stages of nursery propagation.<br />

Programme 4.<br />

Development of propagation and nursery technology<br />

4.1 Standardization of macro-propagation including advanced techniques <strong>for</strong><br />

rootstocks and commercial varieties<br />

4.1.1 Effect of different rootstocks and its maturity on graft success in Cabernet Sauvignon wine<br />

grapes.<br />

This experiment was conducted to study the effect of different rootstock and stock maturity on graft<br />

success in Cabernet Sauvignon wine grapes. The cuttings of Cabernet Sauvignon were grafted on<br />

Dogridge, 1613 C, St. George and Salt Creek rootstocks with different shoot maturity (mature, semi<br />

mature and green shoot). The growth per<strong>for</strong>mance of the grafted plants showed that the days <strong>for</strong><br />

bud sprout ranged from 15.06 in 1613C to 17.71 in Dogridge grafted vines. The vines grafted on<br />

Dogridge rootstock showed higher percentage of success as compare to vines grafted on others. The<br />

shoot length was also higher in the same rootstock. Higher stock scion ratio was noted in vines<br />

grafted on St. George rootstock as compared with Dogridge.<br />

In case of shoot maturity, semi matures shoots were early to sprout as compared to others. Percent<br />

successful grafts were also higher in the same shoot maturity. However, the green shoots recorded<br />

higher shoot length as compared to the semi mature and mature shoots. Maximum graft success was<br />

recorded in green shoots than mature and semi mature.<br />

4.1.2 Effect of different dates of propagation through hardwood cuttings on success in Dogridge<br />

rootstock.<br />

This experiment was conducted to study the effect of different dates of cuttings multiplication on<br />

success rate of rootstock. The hardwood cuttings of 8-10 mm diameter having 4 nodes were selected<br />

<strong>for</strong> the study. The cuttings were submerged in water <strong>for</strong> overnight and at the time of planting, basal<br />

end was dipped in 2000 ppm IBA solution. The cuttings were planted on four different times with<br />

interval of 15 days. The results indicated that the cuttings planted on 24 th June had higher shoot<br />

length (111.49), total length of primary (307.80 cm) and secondary (671.03 cm) roots, average root<br />

diameter (1.59 mm) as compared to the other dates of planting. The fresh weight of roots was also<br />

higher (24.0 g) as compared to other timings of multiplications. However, the percent dry matter of<br />

roots was less in the same treatment as compared to other planting time. Higher per cent success<br />

rate (94.0%) was also recorded in the same treatment.<br />

| 10 |


<strong>Research</strong> Activities<br />

Programme 5.<br />

Use of rootstocks <strong>for</strong> grape cultivation<br />

5.1 Standardization of rootstocks <strong>for</strong> table and raisin grapes<br />

5.1.1 Influence of rootstocks on table grapevine physiology and biochemistry<br />

Thompson Seedless<br />

No significant differences were observed in pruning weights of Thompson Seedless vines (own rooted<br />

and grafted on 5 rootstocks) during 5 th year of the study. Early bud burst and more number of sprouts<br />

were recorded in Thompson Seedless grafted on 110 R followed by 99 R, 1103 P and St. George.<br />

Delayed sprouting was observed on Dogridge. No significant difference was observed <strong>for</strong> cane<br />

diameter, though it was highest on Dogridge. Lesser stock scion ratio on Dogridge indicates its more<br />

vigour to the scion. Among rootstocks no significant differences were observed in total phenolic and<br />

flavonoid compounds during full bloom stage. Total protein content significantly differed among<br />

rootstocks and it was highest in 110 R rootstock followed by Dogridge. No significant differences<br />

were observed <strong>for</strong> most of the gas exchange parameters during full bloom stage. However, water use<br />

efficiency at single leaf level was recorded maximum on Dogridge followed by those on 110 R, 1103<br />

P and 99 R. Significant differences were observed <strong>for</strong> most of the yield and quality parameters.<br />

Rootstock 110 R recorded highest number of bunches and yield per vine, but average bunch weight,<br />

berry diameter and berry length was highest on Dogridge followed by those on 110 R. No significant<br />

difference was observed <strong>for</strong> raisin recovery among rootstocks.<br />

Tas-A-Ganesh<br />

Per<strong>for</strong>mance of Tas-A-Ganesh grafted on Dogridge, B2-56, 110 R and own rooted Tas-A-Ganesh<br />

were studied <strong>for</strong> six years from 2000-01 to 2006-07. During sixth year no significant differences in<br />

vegetative characters like pruning weight and number of sprouts were observed. Significant difference<br />

was observed <strong>for</strong> total phenolic content during pre bloom stage with maximum on 110 R followed<br />

by own rooted vines. The incidence of downy mildew on bunches was lesser on 110 R and own<br />

rooted vines and higher incidence was on Dogridge. More phenolic compounds recorded in 110 R<br />

followed by own rooted vines and the least was recorded on Dogridge rootstock.<br />

5.1.2 Variation in biochemical composition in leaves and berries of Thompson Seedless grafted<br />

on different rootstocks during berry developmental stages<br />

The changes in biochemical composition of leaves and berries of Thompson Seedless (grafted on 5<br />

rootstocks and own rooted) was monitored at 3-4 mm, 8-10mm, veraison and harvesting. The<br />

second year data revealed significant differences <strong>for</strong> leaf phenolic compounds during pre veraison<br />

stage of sampling, where in Thompson Seedless grafted on St. George recorded maximum phenols<br />

and flavonoids while total flavon - 3 ols was maximum in ungrafted Thompson Seedless. There was<br />

gradual reduction in total phenolic contents from I stage (3-4 mm) to harvest stage of sampling. But,<br />

with the maturity of the leaves, there was slight reduction in phenolic compounds and individual<br />

groups. The reduction was highest in leaves of ungrafted Thompson Seedless and those grafted on<br />

St. George and 99 R. The slight reduction was observed in leaves of Thompson Seedless grafted on<br />

110 R, Dogridge and 1103 P.<br />

Similarly, total phenolics, individual groups of phenols and total protein content in berries during<br />

different developmental stages showed significant differences, wherein maximum berry phenolic<br />

compounds and individual phenolics groups during two stages (3-4 mm and 8-10 mm berries) of<br />

berry sampling and was maximum in Thompson Seedless grafted on Dogridge, 1103 P and 110 R<br />

| 11 |


NRC <strong>for</strong> <strong>Grapes</strong> | Annual Report 2006-07<br />

rootstocks. Compared to reduction in phenolic contents of leaves from I stage to harvest stage, there<br />

was greater reduction in these compounds in berries of ungrafted and grafted Thompson Seedless<br />

berries. There was gradual reduction in total phenolic content of berries from veraison stage (stage<br />

III) till harvest in all the rootstocks. Protein content in the berries showed an increasing trend till<br />

veraison and later it decreased during ripening (Fig 2).<br />

Total proteins (mg/g fresh wt)<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

I stage II stage III stage IV stage<br />

0<br />

Dogridge 110 R 1103 P 99 R St. George Thompson<br />

Rootstocks<br />

Seedless<br />

Fig. 2. Total proteins in Thompson<br />

Seedless grafted on different<br />

rootstocks during berry<br />

development stages<br />

Programme 6.<br />

Horticultural practices <strong>for</strong> quality and yield in table and wine<br />

grapes<br />

6.1 Standardization of canopy architecture<br />

6.1.1 Standardization of canopy architecture <strong>for</strong> Tas-A-Ganesh<br />

Effect of stems on yield and quality of grapes grafted on Dogridge rootstock under flat roof gable system of<br />

training<br />

This experiment was conducted <strong>for</strong> second consecutive year to study the per<strong>for</strong>mance of Tas-A-<br />

Ganesh vines grafted on Dogridge rootstock <strong>for</strong> comparison of the stems in long term. Results<br />

revealed that the growth per<strong>for</strong>mance in terms of vegetative growth i.e., shoot length and diameter,<br />

number of canes per vine was higher in case of double stem as compared to the single stem. The<br />

average bunch weight, 50-berry weight, berry diameter and yield per vine were recorded higher in<br />

Tas-A-Ganesh vines grafted on Dogridge rootstock and trained with double stem as compared to the<br />

single stem. In general, the yield in double stem was significantly higher (13.77 Kg) than single stem<br />

(11.07 Kg). Number of bunches/vine was significantly higher in double stem than in the single stem<br />

vines. This confirms the better per<strong>for</strong>mance of Tas-A-Ganesh vines grafted on Dogridge rootstock<br />

trained with double stem.<br />

Effect of stems on yield and quality of grapes trained on bower system of training<br />

Majority of the vineyards are trained on bower system of training. The grafting is per<strong>for</strong>med on two<br />

shoots of the rootstock. In many of the cases both the grafts are successful out of which only one is<br />

trained to bower. But, in majority of the cases both the shoots are trained that becomes the stem or<br />

trunk. An experiment was conducted to study the effect of stems in bower trained Tas-A-Ganesh<br />

vines. The data revealed that the vines on double stem per<strong>for</strong>med better in terms of growth<br />

per<strong>for</strong>mance and also the yield per vine. However, with the increase in bunch numbers it was found<br />

that the quality in terms of berry diameter gets reduced.<br />

| 12 |


<strong>Research</strong> Activities<br />

Comparison of grafted vines with own rooted Tas-A-Ganesh vines<br />

The objective of conducting the experiment was to confirm long-term effect of Tas-A-Ganesh vines<br />

grafted on Dogridge rootstock with the own rooted vines under flat roof gable system of training. The<br />

growth per<strong>for</strong>mance in terms of shoot length, cane diameter, number of shoots per vine and leaf<br />

area per shoot was recorded higher in case of Tas-A-Ganesh vines grafted on Dogridge rootstock as<br />

compared to the own rooted vines <strong>for</strong> the second consecutive year.<br />

The yield per<strong>for</strong>mance in terms of biomass, number of bunches per vine, 50-berry weight, average<br />

bunch weight, berry diameter and yield per vine was higher in the grafted vines as compared to the<br />

own rooted vines.<br />

Effect of training modification on yield and quality of Tas-A-Ganesh vines grafted on Dogridge rootstock<br />

An experiment was conducted to study the effect of different training modification on growth and<br />

yield of Tas-A-Ganesh vines grafted on Dogridge rootstock. The vines were trained on flat roof gable<br />

with different modification by varying the numbers of cordons and also the directions (horizontal and<br />

vertical). In the present study, it was observed that the shoots positioned vertically were more fruitful<br />

than the horizontally placed shoots. The numbers of shoots were higher in case of four cordons either<br />

placed vertically or horizontally followed by double cordons and single cordons. The shoot length and<br />

cane diameter were higher in case of single cordon placed horizontally. The cane diameter was less<br />

in case of four cordons either placed horizontally or diagonally. This might have been due to the<br />

dilution effect. As the number and length of cordon increased, the cane diameter was reduced.<br />

The yield per<strong>for</strong>mance in terms of number of bunches per vine was higher in case of the vines trained<br />

with four cordons followed by double and single cordons placed either horizontally or vertically. The<br />

average bunch weight was higher in single cordon placed horizontally as compared to the double and<br />

four cordons. The average bunch weight was less in case of four cordons placed either horizontally<br />

or vertically as compared to the other type. Though the yield per vine was higher in case of four<br />

cordons, the berry diameter was reduced drastically. The increased in number of bunches per vine<br />

reduced the berry diameter. This might be due to the competition of number of <strong>for</strong> their nutrient<br />

requirement resulted in to the reduction in the quality of the bunches.<br />

Effect of training modification on yield and quality of own rooted vines<br />

Though the growers have realized the importance of rootstock in raising the vineyards, there are still<br />

many grape gardens raised on their own roots. Considering this, an experiment was conducted to<br />

study the effect of own rooted Tas-A-Ganesh vines trained on the flat roof gable system of training.<br />

The vines were trained with single, double and four cordons either placed diagonally or horizontally.<br />

It was observed that the growth per<strong>for</strong>mance in terms of shoot length and cane diameter was higher<br />

in case of single cordon as compared to other treatments. The number of bunches per vine, average<br />

bunch weight and berry diameter was higher in case of single cordon followed by double and four<br />

cordons either placed vertically or horizontally. The total yield per vine was higher in case of four<br />

cordons but the yield in terms of quality i.e., berry diameter and average bunch weight was less in<br />

four cordons placed horizontally or vertically as compared to the other types. The quality yield (berry<br />

size >18 mm, TSS 18-20°B, bunch weight 350-500 g) was recorded in case of single cordons and<br />

double cordons as compared to the four cordons modification in the same training system.<br />

| 13 |


NRC <strong>for</strong> <strong>Grapes</strong> | Annual Report 2006-07<br />

Per<strong>for</strong>mance of own rooted and grafted vines trained on bower system<br />

The per<strong>for</strong>mance of own root in comparison with the grafted vines was the main objective of the<br />

experiment. Both type of vines were trained to bower. Preliminary study showed significant<br />

differences <strong>for</strong> growth and quality parameters in Tas-A-Ganesh vines trained on bower system. The<br />

grafted vines per<strong>for</strong>med well in terms of growth parameters i.e. shoot length, cane diameter, leaf<br />

area, number of shoots per vine, etc. and yield parameters i.e. number of bunches per vine, average<br />

bunch weight, berry diameter, 50-berry weight, yield per vine, etc.<br />

Effect of bunch load on colour development in Sharad Seedless and Flame Seedless grapes grafted on<br />

Dogridge rootstock<br />

This experiment was conducted to study the effect of bunch load in achieving the uni<strong>for</strong>m bunch<br />

colour in Sharad Seedless and Flame Seedless grapes grafted on Dogridge rootstock.<br />

The bunch load per vine varied from 30 per vine to 90 bunches per vine. It was observed that with<br />

the increase in number of bunches, there was decrease in percent uni<strong>for</strong>m colour bunches per vine.<br />

The days taken <strong>for</strong> colour development were increased with the increase in bunch load per vine. 50-<br />

berry weight and berry diameter was also recorded higher with the minimum number of bunches<br />

retained per vine. Significant differences were also recorded <strong>for</strong> quality yield per vine. The increase<br />

in number of bunches per vine resulted in the reduction in the berry size. Significant differences were<br />

recorded <strong>for</strong> internal CO 2 concentration and also transpiration rate. No significant difference were<br />

recorded <strong>for</strong> stomatal conductance. 50 bunches per vine were found to be optimum to produce better<br />

quality grapes. The same trend was recorded <strong>for</strong> Flame Seedless grapes.<br />

6.5 Protected cultivation <strong>for</strong> improving quality of grapes<br />

6.5.1 Effect of shading material on yield and quality of grapes grafted on Dogridge rootstock<br />

An experiment was conducted to study the effect of different shading material on yield and quality of<br />

Tas-A-Ganesh grapes grafted on Dogridge rootstock. The vines were covered with different shading<br />

material HDPE plastic, green and black shade nets, gunny cloth, sarees etc.<br />

Average bunch weight and berry diameter was recorded higher in plastic covered vines followed by<br />

green coloured shade nets (with 50% light) and gunny cloth as compared to the control where no<br />

shading material was used. TSS was also recorded to be higher in case of plastic covered vines. Yield<br />

per vine was also higher in plastic covered vines followed by green coloured shade nets as compared<br />

to the control vines. However, the differences <strong>for</strong> photosynthesis were found to be non significant.<br />

The rate of stomata conductance was higher in green shade nets followed by sarees and gunny cloths<br />

treatment. The rate of transpiration was also higher in green shade nets as compared to other<br />

shading material. The overall per<strong>for</strong>mance was recorded better in plastic followed by bunches<br />

covered with green shade nets.<br />

Programme 7.<br />

Nutrient and soil management in grapes<br />

7.2 Developing petiole nutrient guides <strong>for</strong> wine grapes<br />

7.2.1 Developing petiole nutrient guides <strong>for</strong> Cabernet Sauvignon<br />

Petiole samples were analysed and yield and quality parameters were recorded from wine Cabernet<br />

Sauvignon vineyards from the Nasik region between 2005-2007. A database is being maintained. At<br />

| 14 |


<strong>Research</strong> Activities<br />

growers farm at Dindori, data were recorded <strong>for</strong> vines raised on own roots and vines grafted on 110R<br />

(Vitis berlandieri x Vitis rupestris) and Dogridge (Vitis champini) rootstock being irrigated with<br />

irrigation water having low salinity (EC= 0.60 - 0.65 dS/m) during 2005-06 and 2006-07. No<br />

significant differences were observed with respect to yield amongst different stock scion combinations<br />

during both the years.<br />

Effect of different stocks on tissue nutrient contents<br />

Nutrient concentration in tissues was affected significantly by the stock. During 2005-2006 fruiting<br />

season nutrient concentrations in the petioles (5 th leaf position) during full bloom stage and 7 th leaf<br />

position 60 days after pruning were studied. Own rooted vines contained significantly higher K, Mg,<br />

Na and Zn, Na and chloride content in petioles compared to vines grafted on Dogridge and 110R<br />

rootstock at 45 full bloom stage. Vines grafted on 110R and own rooted vines also contained<br />

significantly higher P content in petioles.<br />

At sixty days after pruning also own rooted vines and vines grafted on 110R rootstock contained<br />

significantly higher P content compared to vines grafted on Dogridge rootstock. At this stage the<br />

differences with respect to K were not significant among grafted and ungrafted vines and the grafted<br />

vines contained significantly less chloride content. The Mg content was significantly higher in the<br />

petioles of own rooted wines compared to vines grafted on Dogridge rootstock. Lowest<br />

concentration was observed in Dogridge rootstock. At 90 days 110 R and Dogridge rootstocks<br />

contained significantly higher K than Salt Creek.<br />

During 2006-07 nutrients content in petioles (5 th leaf position) opposite to bunch was determined at<br />

full bloom stage. K, Na and Zn, Na and chloride content was significantly higher in petioles (5 th leaf<br />

position) of own rooted vines compared to vines grafted on Dogridge and 110 R rootstock. Petiole<br />

P content was significantly higher in own rooted as well as vines grafted on 110R rootstock<br />

compared to vines grafted on Dogridge rootstock. Nutrient content in petioles and blades in middle<br />

leaves (7-10 th leaf position) at full bloom stage was also studied. Both petioles and lamina of own<br />

rooted vines contained significantly higher Mg, Zn, Na and chloride content compared to vines<br />

grafted on Dogridge and 110 R rootstock. Petioles K content was significantly higher in own rooted<br />

vines compared to grafted vines, however, differences were not significant in lamina. The above<br />

results revealed that nutrient uptake pattern was significantly affected by the stock system.<br />

7.4 Techniques to improve nutrient use efficiency in grapes including farm waste<br />

recycling<br />

Effect of rootstock on nutrient uptake and yield and yield parameters in Thompson Seedless vines<br />

During the period the nutrient content in vines was studied at different stages and the data were<br />

recorded to study the effect of rootstocks on nutrient uptake pattern of the vines. Rootstock effect<br />

was significant with respect to some nutrients. All the three rootstocks (Salt Creek, Dogridge and 110<br />

R) significantly reduced the chloride content in the petioles at all the stages (45, 60,75 and 90 days<br />

after pruning) of sampling during fruiting season 2005-2006. Vines grafted on Salt creek significantly<br />

higher chloride content than the other two rootstocks. Significantly less sodium content in petioles<br />

of Thompson Seedless vines grafted on 110 R stock at all the stages compared to other stock scion<br />

combinations. At 60 and 90 days Thompson Seedless on Dogridge and Salt Creek contained<br />

significantly higher Na than self rooted Thompson Seedless vines in petioles.<br />

| 15 |


NRC <strong>for</strong> <strong>Grapes</strong> | Annual Report 2006-07<br />

At 45 and 60 days, 110R stock resulted in significantly higher P concentration than other rootstocks<br />

lowest concentration was observed in Dogridge rootstock. Own rooted vines significantly higher<br />

petiole P content then vines grafted on Dogridge rootstock at 60, 75 and 90 days. At 45 days<br />

petioles of own rooted vines had significantly higher K content compared to the three rootstocks. At<br />

90 days 110R and Dogridge rootstocks coned significantly higher K than Salt Creek. Significantly<br />

higher Zinc concentration was observed in the petioles of own rooted vines compared to grafted<br />

vines at all the stages of sampling.The studies were continued <strong>for</strong> the fruiting season 2006-07 also.<br />

Self-rooted vines contained significantly higher K than the vines raised on rootstocks at 45 days<br />

during foundation pruning 2006-2007. The vines on Salt creek rootstocks had significantly higher P<br />

content compared to vines raised on 110R. All the three rootstocks resulted in significantly less<br />

chloride concentration that own rooted vines. Significantly less Na content was found in case of vines<br />

raised on 110R rootstock compared to Dogridge and Salt Creek. Studies with respect to other<br />

nutrients and other stages are in progress.<br />

110 R rootstock resulted in significantly higher bunch number per vine during the fruiting season<br />

2006-2007. All the rootstocks produced significantly higher yield than own rooted vines. Yield per<br />

vine was highest in case of 110 R / Thompson Seedless combination and was significantly higher<br />

than Dogridge / Thompson Seedless combination. Shelf life studies showed that per cent<br />

physiological loss of water from bunch was highest in case of own rooted vines. After 8 days at<br />

ambient laboratory temperature the physiological loss in weight (PLW) was significantly higher in case<br />

of own rooted vines (14.76%) than the grafted vines. All the three rootstocks did not differ<br />

significantly with respect to the PLW.<br />

Rootstock effect on zinc content in Tas-A-Ganesh tissues (2002-2006)<br />

The vine tissues were sampled and analysed 12 times at different growth stages from the same vines<br />

between 2002-2006. The concentration of the zinc was always significantly higher in petioles of own<br />

rooted compared to grafted vines at all the stages of sampling. In 10 out of 12 sampling stages there<br />

was no significant different in zinc content in the petioles of vines grafted on 110 R and those grafted<br />

on Dogridge rootstock. The blades of own rooted vines also had significantly higher zinc content.<br />

The vines grafted on the two rootstocks also did not differ in zinc uptake. The variations in Zn<br />

concentrations observed in the tissues did not reflect in yield of the vines. The data pointed out that<br />

the own rooted vines might require different rates of zinc applications compared to grafted vines to<br />

maintain the same concentration in the vine parts.<br />

Studies on evaluation of grapevine rhizosphere and non-rhizosphere fungi <strong>for</strong> P solubilization<br />

Twelve Aspergillus isolates isolated from the rhizosphere and non- rhizosphere soils of the<br />

grapevines were evaluated <strong>for</strong> the P solubilization in the laboratory. All the isolates from rhizosphere<br />

and non- rhizosphere solubilized the P from added calcium triphosphate (250 ppm P) ranging from<br />

124.3 ppm to 178 ppm compared to only 3.3 ppm in the absolute control after 5 days of<br />

incubation. The higher content of solubilized P in case of above isolates was supported by more<br />

reduction in the pH of the media. The lowest solubilization of P was observed in case of isolate<br />

number 12 and the smallest zone diameter were also observed in the same isolate. The reduction in<br />

pH in comparison to the control was also least in case of same isolate. Further studies in this respect<br />

are in progress.<br />

| 16 |


<strong>Research</strong> Activities<br />

7.4.2 On farm wastes recycling<br />

An experiment has been conducted on effect of recycling of pruned biomass and graded levels of N<br />

of Sharad Seedless grapes. The treatment differences were not significant after the first year of the<br />

experimentation. The experiment is continued.<br />

7.5 Studies on nutrient disorders<br />

7.5.2 Nutrient composition of tissues in vines exhibiting black leaf symptoms<br />

Variations in the nutrient content of healthy (no visual symptoms on leaves) and affected (leaves with<br />

visual symptoms) present on the same vine were studied, as all the leaves did not exhibit the leafblackening<br />

symptom. The soil analysis after the appearance of the symptoms was not conclusive.<br />

The tissue samples (petiole, leaf blade from top to bottom on a shoot) were collected from the healthy<br />

and affected shoots of the same vine (Thompson Seedless grafted on Dogridge rootstock). The rachis<br />

of the bunch from the same shoots were also analysed during fruit ripening stage, <strong>for</strong> macro and<br />

micronutrients. Petioles, leaf blades and rachis from affected vine parts contained significantly lower<br />

K and higher Na and Cl content. The P content in tissues of the affected shoots was also reduced<br />

significantly. The results corroborated our findings of earlier years that black leaf symptom in<br />

Thompson Seedless vines was caused by low potassium content as indicated by tissue analysis. The<br />

micronutrient cations Zn, Fe, Cu and Mn were not found associated with the development of the<br />

symptom.<br />

In order to know if chloride or sodium alone is associated with the symptoms development an<br />

experiment using sodium salts was conducted. The vines were sprayed with NaCl and Na 2 SO 4<br />

@ 0.50% be<strong>for</strong>e veraison stage and the symptom development was observed. The petioles and leaf<br />

blades were analysed <strong>for</strong> K, Na and chloride content. The sprays with these sodium salts resulted in<br />

marginal leaf burn but no blackening of the tissues was observed.<br />

Programme 9.<br />

Grape physiology including use of bioregulators<br />

9.1 Studies on pink berry in white grapes and its management<br />

9.1.2 Studies to find the root cause and its remedy through cell suspension culture<br />

Pink berry disorder results in reduction in export, increase loss of around crore rupees. To find out<br />

cause and its remedies work on cell suspension culture was initiated. The preliminary observations<br />

showed that the callus was generated from tender leaves, petioles, tendrils, berries and berry skin.<br />

The callus generated from above plant parts are ready <strong>for</strong> cell suspension culture. The trial <strong>for</strong> further<br />

investigations is in progress.<br />

9.1.3 Effect of nutrients on pink berry incidence in Thompson Seedless grapes<br />

Effect of nutrient sprays/bunch dipping was studied on the incidence of pink berry disorder in<br />

Thompson Seedless grapes. Potassium salts (potassium nitrate and potassium sulphate), Calcium salts<br />

(CaNO 3 , CaCl 2 ) were sprayed @ 0.5% ensuring full bunch coverage while laboratory grade<br />

orthophosphoric acid was used <strong>for</strong> bunch dipping @ 0.2 and 0.5% (v/v) basis. The treatments were<br />

imposed twice be<strong>for</strong>e (15 days) and at berry softening stage. Application of calcium chloride reduced<br />

the anthocyanin (520 nm) significantly compared to other treatments.<br />

| 17 |


NRC <strong>for</strong> <strong>Grapes</strong> | Annual Report 2006-07<br />

9.1.4 Role of bioregulators in pink berry development<br />

Effect of Antioxidants to avoid pink berry <strong>for</strong>mation in Thompson Seedless grapes<br />

The preliminary studies on pink berry incidence were conducted during this year on use of chemicals<br />

like anti-oxidants. The Anti-oxidants did not record the significant differences with respect to per cent<br />

pink berries in a bunch.<br />

Effect of polyamines on pink berry incidence in Thompson Seedless grapes<br />

The preliminary studies on pink berry incidence were conducted during this year by use of<br />

polyamines. In this experiment none of the treatment was effective to complete control of pink berry<br />

<strong>for</strong>mation.<br />

9.1.5 Influence of rootstocks and environment on development of pink berry in Seedless grapes<br />

Thompson Seedless<br />

Preliminary observations revealed significant<br />

difference between rootstocks in the incidence of<br />

pink berries. Least pink berry incidence was<br />

observed in Thompson Seedless grafted on 1613 C<br />

rootstocks followed by own rooted vines (25 - 30%).<br />

While on the other rootstocks like Dogridge, 110 R,<br />

1103 P, St. George, SO-4, 99 R, the incidence<br />

ranged from 70-80%. Total phenolic content was<br />

reduced in pink berries than in green berries, while<br />

total proteins (Fig. 3), anthocyanins, reducing sugar<br />

(Fig. 4) and TSS increased in pink berries. Strong<br />

positive correlation was observed between incidence<br />

of pink berries and reducing sugars, proteins and<br />

negative correlation between total flavonoids.<br />

Further detailed studies on individual anthocyanin<br />

derivatives and phenol derivatives, in pink berries<br />

will be carried out in the coming years.<br />

In another study on the incidence of pink berry in<br />

CPPU treated Thompson Seedless bunches, own<br />

rooted vines had significantly less numbers if pink<br />

berry bunches per vine (3.86 %) compared to those<br />

grafted on different rootstocks (43.57 -55.61%.)<br />

The self rooted vines had significantly less TSS<br />

content compared to that of grafted vines. The acidity (%) in berries was significantly higher in self<br />

rooted than those grafted on different rootstocks.<br />

Tas-A-Ganesh<br />

In another study the similar observations were recorded in two experimental plots of the centre on<br />

Tas-A-Ganesh vines grown on own roots and Dogridge, B2-56 and 110 R rootstocks where CPPU<br />

was not applied. The vineyards were raised under uni<strong>for</strong>m fertilization and irrigation and other<br />

cultural practices during current year. The observations were recorded on 06-03-2007. Similar to<br />

Thompson Seedless vines the Tas-A-Ganesh vines grown on own roots had lowest (significantly less)<br />

Total proteins (mg / g)<br />

6<br />

5<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

0<br />

| 18 |<br />

Pink<br />

Green<br />

Dogridge 110R 1103 P 99 R St. 1613 C Salt<br />

George Creek<br />

Rootstocks<br />

SO-4 Thompson<br />

Seedless<br />

Fig. 3. Total protein content in pink and green<br />

T. seedless berries<br />

Reducing sugar (mg/g)<br />

100<br />

90<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

Dogridge<br />

Pink<br />

110R<br />

1103 P<br />

Green<br />

99 R<br />

St. George<br />

Rootstocks<br />

Fig. 4. Reducing sugars in pink and green<br />

berries<br />

1613 C<br />

Salt Creek<br />

SO-4<br />

Thompson Seedless


<strong>Research</strong> Activities<br />

number of bunches having pink berries compared to other stock scion combinations. The TSS<br />

content was also less in bunches having no visual pink discoloration in own rooted vines. However<br />

the berries of the own rooted vines having pink discoloration had significantly higher TSS content.<br />

The downy mildew infection on bunch stalks increased the percentage of pink berry affected bunches<br />

in all the stock scion combinations.<br />

9.1.6 Effect of paper cover bags on incidence of pink berry <strong>for</strong>mation Thompson Seedless<br />

grapes<br />

The specially made paper bags were used to cover the bunches in order to avoid pink berries vis-avis<br />

improvement in berry quality. The significant variation was observed between the covered<br />

bunches and without covering. The bunches which covered at 75 days after pruning did not show<br />

symptoms of pink berry <strong>for</strong>mation as 81.5% pink berries were observed in open bunches. Similar<br />

observations were recorded with number of pink berries in a bunch. TSS was observed more in open<br />

and partially covered bunches as compared to fully covered bunches. A reverse trend was observed<br />

with respect to acidity.<br />

9.3 Standardization of bioregulators schedule <strong>for</strong> improving quality and yield of table<br />

and wine grapes<br />

9.3.1 Standardization of bioregulators schedule <strong>for</strong> improving quality and yield of table grapes<br />

Effect of CPPU to improve berry quality and yield in Thompson Seedless grapes<br />

The CPPU (0.1%)was applied at 3-4 and 6-7 mm berry size stage as a dip. The data on berry and<br />

bunch characters revealed the significant differences in all the parameters except acidity of berry<br />

juice. Mean bunch weight was recorded significantly higher in CPPU and GA 3 treatment as<br />

compared to control (no application of any bioregulator) and the highest bunch weight was recorded<br />

when the CPPU was applied @ 2 ppm at 3-4 and 6-7 berry size stages. The similar results were<br />

observed with respect to 100- berry weight, berry diameter, berry length, pedicel thickness and yield<br />

per vine. However, TSS was recorded higher in control than the CPPU and GA 3 treatment.<br />

The physiological loss in weight (PLW) was observed <strong>for</strong> 7 days in shelf at room temperature after<br />

30 days of cold storage. The results revealed that the significant differences were recorded up to 3 rd<br />

day in shelf and the minimum physiological loss of weight was recorded in CPPU treatment as<br />

compared to control.<br />

Effect of stage and doses of GA 3 and CPPU on Thompson Seedless and Sharad Seedless in <strong>Grapes</strong><br />

To standardize the dose of GA 3 and CPPU <strong>for</strong> production of export quality grapes, the present study<br />

was conducted. The GA 3 @ 30, 40 and 50 ppm was applied, similarly CPPU @ 1.0 ml, 1.5 ml and<br />

2.0 ml per liter was applied at 3 mm, 4 mm and 6 mm berry size stage as a first dip after berry<br />

setting. The second dip was given at 8-9 mm berry size stage with 40 ppm GA 3 and 2 ppm CPPU.<br />

Effect of Biostimulants on berry quality of Thompson Seedless, Sharad Seedless and Flame Seedless grapes<br />

To keep leaves healthy biostimulants (stim rich, speed, kelpak, biozyme, fantac and biovita) are being<br />

used during the post lag phase which coincides with the cold climatic conditions. To see the effect<br />

locally available biostimulants were used to study their influence in Thompson Seedless, Sharad<br />

Seedless and Flame Seedless grapes. Variable response of biostimulants was observed in all the three<br />

grape varieties. In Thompson seedless only berry diameter was increased with the application of<br />

biostimulants. In Sharad Seedless, 50-berry weight and TSS was increased and in Flame Seedless<br />

| 19 |


NRC <strong>for</strong> <strong>Grapes</strong> | Annual Report 2006-07<br />

grapes, the biostimulants influenced the TSS and pedicel thickness. Confirmation, the study will be<br />

continued <strong>for</strong> second year.<br />

9.3.3 Quantification of endogenous levels of bioregulators at different stages in grape varieties<br />

Preliminary analysis of the grape varieties viz. Red Globe, Fantasy Seedless, Perlette, A-17/3 and<br />

Thompson Seedless at different phenological stages showed the variation in gibberellic acid, auxins<br />

and abscissic acid content. This trial is in continuation <strong>for</strong> con<strong>for</strong>mity.<br />

9.4 New chemicals / botanicals <strong>for</strong> improving budbreak, quality and yield of grapes<br />

9.4.1 Bio-efficacy of Fantac in grapes<br />

Fantac contains amino acids and considered as one of the bio-stimulant used to improve berry quality<br />

in grapes. The significant differences were recorded with the application of fantac with respect to<br />

pedicel thickness, berry length TSS and shelf life. The Application of fantac @ 1ml/litre recorded<br />

the more thick pedicels as compared to the other treatments. Like wise, berry length was recorded<br />

significantly more in T3 (Fantac @ 1.5 ml/litre) However, TSS was recorded significantly more in<br />

control than the fantac treatments. Physiological loss in weight was recorded the significant<br />

differences up to 5 days and the significantly less PLW was recorded in T3 treatment (Fantac: 1.5<br />

ml/litre). This indicates that the application of Fantac @ 1.5 ml/litre seems to be beneficial to obtain<br />

good quality grapes.<br />

9.4.2 Bio-efficacy of Green miracle in <strong>Grapes</strong><br />

Green miracle is an antitranspirant containing fatty acids. The significant differences were recorded<br />

with the spray of green miracle with respect to mean bunch weight, 100 berry weight berry size and<br />

yield/plant. The significant differences were also recorded in shelf life. Significantly higher bunch<br />

weight was recorded with the spray of green miracle @ 4 ml/litre. In general, the green miracle<br />

treatments recorded the higher bunch weight and 100 berry weight.<br />

The more berry diameter and length was recorded with the application of green miracle as compared<br />

to water spray and no application of green miracle. Yield/vine was also recorded higher in green<br />

miracle treatments. Physiological loss in weight was recorded significantly minimum in green miracle<br />

treatments up to 5 days.<br />

9.4.3 Bio-efficacy of Boomflower in grapes<br />

Boom flower contains nitrobenzene, which is used <strong>for</strong> improving the fruit quality. In the present<br />

study, 4 applications at different concentrations (0.1 - 2 ml/litre) were applied. The significant<br />

differences were recorded with the application of Boom flower with respect to berry diameter and<br />

pulp content. Though the differences were not significant, the yield/vine was also recorded higher in<br />

boom flower treatment (2.0 ml/litre). The same treatment recorded the least PLW during the storage<br />

up to 5 days.<br />

Programme 10. Studies on viticulturally important microorganisms<br />

10.1 Development of biofungicides <strong>for</strong> major diseases<br />

Isolation of antagonists<br />

A yeast and an actinomyetes exhibiting antogonistic properties were isolated from the vineyard.<br />

| 20 |


<strong>Research</strong> Activities<br />

10.4 Development of bio-remedial agents <strong>for</strong> pesticides<br />

Bio-remediation of triazole fungicides with pre-harvest sprays of <strong>for</strong>mulations of bio-control agents<br />

Trichoderma, Ampelomyces, Verticilium etc.<br />

1. A field trial conducted during fruiting season of 2006, indicated that sprays of Trichoderma<br />

during last 30 days be<strong>for</strong>e harvest, reduced the PHI of flusilazole from 48 days to 18 days. The<br />

results have useful practical application as this fungicide was used extensively during last 40 - 50<br />

days of harvest due to its excellent bio-efficacy, but was found in highest number of grape<br />

samples collected from vineyards producing exportable table grapes.<br />

2. In the second year field trial, during fruiting season of 2007, the results with Trichoderma was<br />

confirmed. Other bio-control agents viz. Verticillium lecanii, Ampelomyces quiscalis, and two<br />

isolates of Saccharomyces used <strong>for</strong> wine fermentation were also found to reduce PHI of<br />

flusilazole.<br />

3. The bio-remediation studies were also conducted at growers field in Niphad (Nasik) to study the<br />

degradation of hexaconazole and myclobutanil, the other two triazole fungicides used by grape<br />

growers during last 30-40 days of harvest, as their PHI is relatively less i.e. 30-38 days. However,<br />

no significant results were obtained.<br />

10.5 Development of native yeasts <strong>for</strong> wine making<br />

Twenty four yeast cultures were isolated from the surface of fruits and germinating cereals and pulses<br />

and analysed <strong>for</strong> sugar and alcohol tolerance. Isolates RS-1 from pea and SR-1 from wheat could<br />

tolerate up to 25% sugar and 11% alcohol.<br />

Programme 11. Integrated disease management in grapes<br />

11.1 Studies on the bioefficacy of fungicides and safer environmental profile products<br />

<strong>for</strong> management of major grape diseases<br />

11.1.1 Multilocational field trial on chemical control of downy mildew<br />

Until recently there were only few fungicides available in India <strong>for</strong> control of diseases caused by<br />

Phycomycetes in general and downy mildew of grapes in specific. However, in recent past lots of<br />

new chemicals are being used outside the country <strong>for</strong> the control of downy mildew of grapes. Some<br />

of the chemicals tested in our experiments have been listed below according to their group.<br />

Main group Subgroup Name of fungicide<br />

N-Phenyl amides – Metalaxyl-M<br />

QOI fungicides (Quinne Outside Inhibitors) Methoxy acrylates Azoxystrobin<br />

Methoxy carbamates Pyraclostrobin<br />

Oxymino acetates Kresoxim methyl, Trifloxy strobin<br />

Imidazolinones<br />

Fenamidone<br />

Cyanoacetamide oximes – Cymoxanil<br />

CAA fungicides (Carboxilic Acide Amides) Cinnamic acide amides Dimethomorph<br />

Valinamide carbamet Iprovalicarb<br />

Mandelic acide amide Mandipropamid<br />

Dithiocarbamates relatives – Metiram, Propineb,<br />

| 21 |


NRC <strong>for</strong> <strong>Grapes</strong> | Annual Report 2006-07<br />

Attempt was made to test the bio-efficacy of all these fungicides in one experiment. The experiment<br />

was conducted simultaneously at five locations covering major grapes growing area of Maharashtra<br />

State. Two locations were in Nasik district (Kalvan, and Chandori), two locations were in Sangli<br />

district (Nimni and Mhaisal), and one location was in Pune district (Narayangaon). The trial was<br />

conducted during fruiting season of October 2006 to April 2007. In case of all new fungicides the<br />

residue was estimated at harvest at <strong>National</strong> Referral Laboratory, using LC MS-MS. Fungicide doses<br />

standardized <strong>for</strong> control of downy mildew on leaves and bunches and residues detected at harvest<br />

have been given in Table 5.<br />

Between October to December 2006, 7 to 8 sprays of the fungicides were given at each location. It<br />

is important to note that in case of no fungicide the residue was detected above MRL. This indicates<br />

that all these fungicides are safe to use.<br />

Table 5. Optimum doses of the fungicides <strong>for</strong> control of downy mildew in grapes and their residue in grapes<br />

at harvest in comparison to MRL<br />

Fungicide and Formulation<br />

Optimum dose<br />

Average of<br />

residue detected<br />

at harvest (ppm)<br />

Mandipropamid 250SC 0.8 – 1.0 ml / l 0 – 0.002<br />

MRL of the<br />

fungicide in<br />

Europe (ppm)<br />

(Mandipropamid + mancozeb) 65WG 2.0 g / l 0 – 0.093 –<br />

(Metalaxyl M + mancozeb) 68WP 2.5 g / l 0 – 0.022<br />

(Ridomil Gold)<br />

(Metalaxyl M + mancozeb) 68WG 2.5 g / l 0.059 – 0.138<br />

Dimethomorph 50WP (Acrobat) 0.8 g / l – –<br />

Dimethomorph 50WP + mancozeb (0.75 g + 2.0 g ) / l 0 – 0.021<br />

78WP as Tank mix<br />

Metiram 70WG 2.0 g /l – –<br />

Pyraclostrobin 20WG 0.5 g / l 0.010 – 0.013<br />

(Metiram + pyraclostrobin) 60WDG 1.25 g / l 0 – 0.016<br />

Kocide 3000 1.25 g – 1.5 g / l – –<br />

Kocide 2000 1.25 g – 1.5 g / l – –<br />

(Iprovalicarb 5.5% + propineb 61.25%) 3.0 g / l 0.027 – 0.032<br />

66.75WP (Melodyduo)<br />

(Fenamidone 10 % + mancozeb 50%) 1.5 g / l 0.005 – 0.076<br />

60WG (Secure)<br />

Kresoxim methyl 500SC (RIL011) 1.0 ml / l 0.027 – 0.342<br />

(Captan 70%+ Hexaconazole 5%) 1.5 g / l – –<br />

75WP (Taquat)<br />

Captan 70WP 2.0 g / l – –<br />

Azoxystrobin 200 ml / acre 0.005 – 0.279<br />

| 22 |


<strong>Research</strong> Activities<br />

11.1.2 Chemical control of downy mildew by systemic fungicides after April pruning<br />

Four Sprays of Mandipropamid 250SC, 0.8 - 1.0 ml/l; (Mandipropamid + mancozeb) 65WG, 2.0<br />

g/l ; (Metalaxyl M + mancozeb) 68WP (Ridomil Gold), 2.5 g/l ; (Metalaxyl M + mancozeb) 68WG,<br />

2.5 g/l showed excellent control of downy mildew and retained leaves till October. Mandipropamid<br />

alone could not control rust disease on leaves, but did not cause leaf fall till October.<br />

11.1.3 Bio-efficacy of Thiophanate methyl in control of anthracnose and powdery mildew<br />

Four Sprays of Thiophanate methyl 70WP, 0.615 g/l showed good control of anthracnose and<br />

moderate control of powdery mildew till October. But the anthracnose on young shoots during<br />

September was not controlled effectively.<br />

11.2 Use of Kocide 2000 (copper hydroxide) after foundation pruning<br />

After foundation pruning, during monsoon, anthracnose, downy mildew are major disease problems<br />

in grapes. Recently, incidence of rust is also observed in Thompson seedless, especially after August.<br />

Since the damage caused by these diseases after foundation pruning is not very high, only Bordeaux<br />

mixture, 0.5 % is commonly used <strong>for</strong> control of these diseases. Apart from good control of the<br />

disease, retention of leaves till <strong>for</strong>ward pruning in October is the major objective. Even though the<br />

Bordeaux mixture is good in control of diseases, continuous use leaves dark spots on leaves, which<br />

interfere in photosynthesis. Tender growth show scorching symptoms due to copper toxicity. The<br />

new generation <strong>for</strong>mulation of copper hydroxide (Kocide 2000) was thus tested <strong>for</strong> its efficacy in<br />

control of all above mentioned diseases. Five sprays of Kocide-2000 @ 1.25 g/l (437.5 g metallic<br />

copper/ha) at 10-15 days interval from 15 th June - 27 th August 2006 showed optimum control of<br />

downy mildew, and rust on leaves after backward pruning and reduced leaf fall till the end of<br />

September. The disease control and leaf fall recorded in above treatment was similar to that in case<br />

of Bordeaux mixture 0.5 % which uses considerably high amount of metallic copper.<br />

Control<br />

Kocide-2000, 0.75 g/l<br />

Kocide-2000, 1.0 g/l<br />

Kocide-2000, 1.25 g/l<br />

Bordeaux Mixture 0.5%<br />

Field view of the plants treated with above mentioned treatments. Note the reduction of leaves<br />

during September month as compared to control<br />

| 23 |


NRC <strong>for</strong> <strong>Grapes</strong> | Annual Report 2006-07<br />

11.3 Identification of new grape diseases<br />

Survey <strong>for</strong> incidence of virus diseases in wine varieties<br />

Symptoms of Grapevine Leaf Roll associated virus (GVLRaV) were observed in 1 year to 5 year old<br />

vineyards at Narayangaon, Dindori (Nasik) and presence of GVLRaV 1+3 strain was confirmed with<br />

ELISA tests.<br />

The corky bark and stem pitting symptoms of Rugose Wood Complex were also observed in Shiraz<br />

variety at one vineyards in Baramati and at one vineyard in Niphad (Nasik). Work on confirmation of<br />

presence of virus in the affected vineyards is in progress by calling a meeting of all stakeholders.<br />

The report of the survey was prepared and submitted to plant quarantine officers of the Central and<br />

State Govts. <strong>for</strong> necessary action.<br />

GVLRaV 1+3 was detected from leaves samples collected from private vineyards at Dindori and<br />

Narayangaon, using ELISA tests.<br />

11.5 Studies on biology of grape pathogens<br />

11.5.1 Detection of oospores in downy mildew infected bunches<br />

Young bunches often show downy mildew infection without presence of downy growth of sporangia.<br />

Many times infection on leaves also is not seen in the vineyards, when bunches are infected. This<br />

creates doubt whether bunch is actually infected by downy mildew. The dead tissues in bunch, when<br />

observed under microscope showed abundant oospores of downy mildew. The presence of oospores<br />

in dead tissues on the young bunch can be a easy diagnostic test <strong>for</strong> the downy mildew infection on<br />

bunches, especially when downy growth of the sporangia is absent.<br />

11.5.2 Bunches with dead or discoloured tissues in which<br />

oospores were detected<br />

Attempts were made to detect oospores in downy mildew<br />

infected leaves collected from various infected vineyards<br />

across Maharashtra. The oospores were not detected in<br />

leaves. However, in most of the infected bunches oospores<br />

were detected. Most of the time downy mildew infected<br />

bunches remain in vineyards and later mixed in the soil. The<br />

oospores are the weather resistant spores of downy mildew<br />

and can survive in soil <strong>for</strong> years. It was there<strong>for</strong>e suggested that removal of downy mildew infected<br />

bunches from the vineyards and their burning will reduce the oospore inoculum from the vineyard.<br />

Table 6. Detection of oospores of downy mildew in different tissues in grapes<br />

Tissue<br />

No. of oospores at 100 x<br />

Leaves 0.00<br />

Pre-bloom bunch 56.00<br />

Bunch – Necrotic tissue 6.09<br />

Bunch – Discoloured 2.18<br />

Bunch – Green adjoining infected tissue 0.82<br />

| 24 |


<strong>Research</strong> Activities<br />

11.5.3 Development of single node segment explants <strong>for</strong> maintaining inoculum of powdery and<br />

downy mildew<br />

Explants from Thompson Seedless clone 2A and Tas-A-Ganesh and callus of Sharad Seedless are<br />

being developed <strong>for</strong> maintaining inoculum of Plasmopara viticola and Uncinula necator, the two<br />

bio-trophic pathogen causing downy and powdery mildews respectively, <strong>for</strong> different studies.<br />

11.5.4 Studies on "Effect of cultural conditions on growth and sporulation of Botryodiplodia<br />

theobromae"<br />

The effect of temperature, pH and nutrients on growth and sporulation in four isolates of<br />

Botryodiplodia theobromae Pat., known to cause various problems like arrested growth of shoots,<br />

lesions on canes and main stems etc. in grapevines under stress conditions, was studied.<br />

The optimum temperature <strong>for</strong> growth and sporulation <strong>for</strong> the isolates was 25°C. The optimum pH<br />

was 6 <strong>for</strong> isolates15/3, 17/3 and S. No. 120 while it was 7.5 <strong>for</strong> isolate 18/1.<br />

Programme 12. Integrated insect and mite pest management in grapes<br />

12.1 Studies on the management thrips and mites<br />

12.1.1 Survey <strong>for</strong> thrips and mites<br />

Thrips population was recorded throughout the year and highest population was observed during<br />

flowering period to early berry setting period i.e. November-December months. High incidence of<br />

mites was noticed during late winter and early summer months of January-February. Weather data<br />

was collected and studies on correlation and regression were made during 2006-07. Thrips and mites<br />

incidence was negatively correlated with rainfall<br />

Two species of thrips viz., Scirtothrips dorsalis and Haplothrips hawaiensis were found attacking<br />

the grapes in Maharashtra<br />

The mite causing the damage to grapes was identified as red spider mite Tetranychus urticae. More<br />

than 50% of the leaves were found infested with mites at Nasik division. The incidence of mite was<br />

also noticed in other parts of Maharashtra<br />

12.1.2 Screening of germplasm against thrips<br />

Different grape varieties and accessions were evaluated <strong>for</strong> their resistance to thrips. Five shoots per<br />

plant were observed <strong>for</strong> the incidence of thrips and each shoot was further divided into shoot tip,<br />

matured shoot and berries. Five plants were observed <strong>for</strong> each variety/accession. The varieties were<br />

rated on a scale of 1-10, with 1 being the most resistant and 10 being the most susceptible.<br />

Varieties/ accessions which showed least thrips attack were Tannat, Khalili, Lake Emerald, Malvasia<br />

Binca de Vaporis and Pinot Noir. Varieties/accessions, which were found most susceptible to thrips<br />

damage, were Thomson Seedless, Kishmish Belyi, 2A clone (Thompson Seedless), Coarna Regia,<br />

EC 36506, Pusa Urvashi, and Superior. It was found that most of the table grape varieties were more<br />

susceptible than wine varieties.<br />

12.1.3 Evaluation of bio-pesticides <strong>for</strong> thrips<br />

Biopesticides like Verticillium lecanii and Beauveria bassiana are commonly being used by grape<br />

| 25 |


NRC <strong>for</strong> <strong>Grapes</strong> | Annual Report 2006-07<br />

growers <strong>for</strong> the management of mealybugs. However, ef<strong>for</strong>ts were made to know their efficacy on<br />

thrips population during fruiting season. Initial results showed that these bio-pesticides were not as<br />

effective as neem <strong>for</strong>mulations and standard insecticide Spinosad 45 SC in reducing thrips<br />

population. Another microbial preparation of Psuedomonas fumosoresus was tested on mites<br />

during fruiting season and the same will be tested <strong>for</strong> one more season to confirm the results<br />

12.1.4 Evaluation of botanicals against thrips and mites<br />

Nimbicidine 1% (azadirachtin 10000 ppm) and another herbal preparation made out of neem and<br />

karanj were tried on thrips and mites <strong>for</strong> their bioefficacy, phyto-toxicity and effect on natural<br />

enemies.<br />

12.1.5 Evaluation of new generation insecticides <strong>for</strong> thrips and mites<br />

New generation chemical Fipronil 80 % WG (Regent) was tested <strong>for</strong> the management thrips.<br />

Heavy incidence of mites was noticed during fruiting season especially around Nasik. New generation<br />

acaricides like abamectin 1.9% EC (Vertimec) , fenpyroximate 5 SC and bio-pesticide Psuedomonas<br />

fumosoreus were tested <strong>for</strong> their bio-efficacy, effect on natural enemies and phytotoxicity.<br />

12.2 Studies on the management mealybugs<br />

12.2.1 Survey <strong>for</strong> mealybug species, ants and natural enemies<br />

Mealybug incidence was recorded during December to March with highest peak during harvesting<br />

months i.e. February-March month and incidence was continued in April wherever late pruning was<br />

observed.<br />

Four mealybug species viz., Maconellicoccus hirsutus, Planococcus citri, Nipaecoccus viridis and<br />

Pseudococcus longispinus were collected. Among them, M. hirsutus and P. citri were found causing<br />

severe loss. Eight species of ants viz., Componotus compressus, Componotus sericus, C.<br />

rufuglaucus, Tapinoma melanocephalum,. Monomorium sp., Techinomyrmix sp., Solenopsis<br />

geminata and Dolichoderus affinis were found associated with the mealybugs in the vineyards. iii.<br />

The green lacewing Chrysoperla carnea was commonly found in many of the vineyards as a predator<br />

of the mealybugs.<br />

12.2.2 Evaluation of safe chemicals <strong>for</strong> the management of mealybugs<br />

Bio-efficacy of mineral oil (Agro spray Oil) on mealybugs and its phytotoxicity, effect on natural<br />

enemies was studied in 2006-07 and mineral @ 0.5% was found to effective in suppressing<br />

mealybug colonies.<br />

12.2.3 Evaluation of new generation insecticides <strong>for</strong> mealybugs<br />

New generation insect growth regulator buprofezin 25 SC (Applaud) was tested <strong>for</strong> the management<br />

of mealybugs and found that @ 1.25 g/l was found to be effective.<br />

Soil drenching of imidacloprid 200 SL @ 1.5 ml/l/vine or imidacloprid 70 WG @ 0.45 g/l/vine<br />

was found to be effective in the management of mealybugs.<br />

Residue analysis <strong>for</strong> both these chemicals was also done and later they were included in the<br />

recommendation list.<br />

| 26 |


<strong>Research</strong> Activities<br />

12.2.4 Demonstration of lady bird beetles against mealybugs<br />

Demonstration trial was conducted in association with Project Directorate of Biological Control,<br />

Bangalore and Maharashtra State Grape Growers' Association, Pune in a farmer's grape garden at<br />

Tuljapur in Maharashtra, a total of 25,000 larvae Cryptolaemus montrouzieri were released<br />

@ 5000/ha from mid December to mid February. A mean of 0.95% bunch infestation was observed<br />

in March 2007 in the released plot as compared to 70.50% bunch infestation in March 2006 in the<br />

unreleased plot.<br />

12.2.5 Development of IPM <strong>for</strong> mealybugs<br />

During 2006-07 several components of IPM were tested <strong>for</strong> the management of mealybugs including<br />

removal alternate host plants and weeds, debarking, destruction of pruned material, soil drenching<br />

with imidacloprid , swabbing with dichlorvos, destruction of ant colonies, foliar spray with buprofezin,<br />

release of Australian ladybird beetle Cryptolaemus montrouzieri and foliar spray of neem<br />

<strong>for</strong>mulations near harvest helped in reducing mealybug incidence and to harvest residue free grapes.<br />

A mean of 1.84% bunch infestation was recorded in IPM plot as compared to 15.61 % in farmers<br />

practice and 25.50% in the untreated check plot.<br />

Programme 13. Management of agrochemical residues and environmental<br />

contaminants in grapes<br />

13.1 Studies on dissipation rates of new generation / other pesticides with reference to<br />

changing MRLs<br />

13.1.1 Persistence of buprofezin residues in grapes<br />

Persistence of buprofezin residues in grapes was explored at two locations, viz. NRC <strong>Grapes</strong>, Pune<br />

and Coimbatore. Degradation rate kinetics was explored at two doses and the estimated PHI was 40<br />

days considering the lowest MRL requirement of 0.02 mg/kg <strong>for</strong> the European Union countries.<br />

13.1.2 Persistence of spinosad residues in 4 different locations of India<br />

A multi-location residue trial was conducted at Pune, Madurai, Hyderabad and Bijapur at<br />

recommended (0.011 g a.i./ha) and double (0.022 g a.i./ha) doses. In all these locations, the<br />

residues of spinosad (Spinosyn A + Spinosyn D) degraded at similar rate. The PHI was found to be<br />

within 8 days considering the lowest MRL of 0.2 mg/kg applicable <strong>for</strong> the EU countries.<br />

13.3 Persistence studies of agrochemical residues in soil and water<br />

13.3.1 Effect of <strong>for</strong>chlorfenuron on soil microbial enzymes<br />

Changes in soil enzyme activities as a consequence of <strong>for</strong>chlorfenuron treatment were studied <strong>for</strong><br />

extra-cellular enzymes namely acid phosphatase, alkaline phosphatase and β-glucosidase and<br />

intracellular enzyme - dehydrogenase. Although small changes in enzyme activities were observed,<br />

<strong>for</strong>chlorfenuron did not have any significant deleterious effect on the enzymatic activity of the test<br />

soils. Simple correlation between degradation percentage and individual enzyme activities did not<br />

produce any significant relationships. The pattern and change of enzyme activity might primarily be<br />

the effect of the incubation period rather than the effect of <strong>for</strong>chlorfenuron itself. Forchlorfenuron<br />

posed to be of no threat to soil biological activity at recommended dose.<br />

| 27 |


NRC <strong>for</strong> <strong>Grapes</strong> | Annual Report 2006-07<br />

13.3.2 Effect of thiamethoxam on soil microbial enzymes<br />

Subsequent to the treatment of soils with thiamethoxam, the dehydrogenase enzyme activity<br />

increased at the beginning, indicating stress induced increase in microbial respiration on exposure to<br />

thiamethoxam. This however decreased at the end of the incubation period of 90 days. The initial<br />

impact on the activities of the extra-cellular enzymes, namely acid phosphatase, alkaline phosphatase<br />

and β-glucosidase also stabilized with time. Thiamethoxam, thus, did not have any significant<br />

deleterious effect on the microbial activity of the test soils on long-term basis.<br />

13.3.3 Sorption behaviour of <strong>for</strong>chlorfenuron on soils<br />

The sorption behaviour of <strong>for</strong>chlorfenuron in three soils of different physico-chemical properties viz.<br />

sandy-loam, clay and silty-clay was explored. The rate constants <strong>for</strong> the adsorption and desorption<br />

at two different temperatures were obtained from the Lindstrom model, which simultaneously<br />

evaluated adsorption and desorption kinetics. The data <strong>for</strong> rate constants, activation energies,<br />

enthalpy of activation, entropy of activation and free energy indicated chemical adsorption of<br />

<strong>for</strong>chlorfenuron on soil. The adsorptivity of different soils might be attributed to the organic matter<br />

and clay contents. A good fit to the linear and Freundlich isotherms was observed. Forchlorfenuron<br />

could be categorised as a chemical with low to medium leaching category.<br />

13.3.4 Sorption behaviour of thiamethoxam on soils<br />

The sorption behaviour of thiamethoxam in three Indian soils of major grapevine growing areas with<br />

different physico-chemical properties is reported. The soil types included clay, sandy-loam and siltyclay<br />

and had different ratios of sand, silt, clay and organic matter content. The data <strong>for</strong> the rate<br />

constants, activation energies, enthalpy of activation, entropy of activation and free energy indicated<br />

physical adsorption of thiamethoxam on soil. The adsorptivity of different soils might be attributed<br />

to the organic matter and clay contents. The extent of adsorption was maximum on sandy-loam soil,<br />

which also had maximum organic matter. A good fit to the linear and Freundlich isotherms was<br />

observed. Thiamethoxam could be categorised as a chemical with medium to high leaching potential.<br />

Programme 14. Development of post-harvest technologies<br />

14.5 Development of technologies <strong>for</strong> unfermented beverages and other products<br />

Bulk storage of fresh grape juice at low temperature (0°C) with least processing operation<br />

Juice of both coloured and colourless varieties obtained from the germplasm block was obtained by<br />

hand crushing without giving any treatment. Seeded and seedless varieties were also in the mixture.<br />

In few cases, the juice was treated to boiling, cooled and stored. However, in other cases, the juice<br />

was stored with following treatments :<br />

i. Juice without any preservative<br />

ii. Juice with the standard dose of sodium benzoate<br />

iii. Juice with the standard dose of potassium bisulphite<br />

iv. Juice with the standard mixture of sodium benzoate and potassium bisulphite<br />

Irrespective of treatments, the juice remained in acceptable quality without any microbial spoilage <strong>for</strong><br />

the period of one year at low temperature storage (0°C).<br />

| 28 |


<strong>Research</strong> Activities<br />

Programme 15. Development of in<strong>for</strong>mation and documentation systems<br />

15.1 Development of databases <strong>for</strong> various applications<br />

15.1.1 Grape germplasm in<strong>for</strong>mation system<br />

To implement RAC recommendations to make provision <strong>for</strong> data fields <strong>for</strong> E.C (exotic collection)<br />

number and I.C (Indigenous collection) number in the software, the E.C/I.C number fields were<br />

created in the database table. These fields were added to the data entry and modification screens and<br />

corresponding program code was written to store the values to the database. These fields were added<br />

to 'View germplasm in<strong>for</strong>mation' screen and the programming language code to show the field values<br />

were incorporated. The search and report module was updated <strong>for</strong> these fields. The help files were<br />

also modified. The software was tested <strong>for</strong> errors and rectified. An installation package was created.<br />

The software was installed on the computer of Scientist I/c <strong>for</strong> germplasm management at the<br />

<strong>Centre</strong> <strong>for</strong> feeding relevant data in the data box.<br />

15.1.2 In<strong>for</strong>mation system on molecular data <strong>for</strong> grape germplasm in India<br />

Designing and coding have been carried out <strong>for</strong><br />

1. Importing band size data from the Excel files in two different <strong>for</strong>mats.<br />

2. Module to search on data <strong>for</strong> band, primer and variety, this screen also facilitate 'Parentage<br />

analysis'.<br />

3. Module to identify variety.<br />

4. Reports module containing reports on<br />

• Band data : a) selected primers <strong>for</strong> a variety b) all primers <strong>for</strong> a variety<br />

• Varieties having same band data <strong>for</strong> a set of primers<br />

• Reports on accession details and primer details<br />

<br />

| 29 |


Collaborative, Externally Funded, Contract<br />

<strong>Research</strong> and Consultancy Projects<br />

I. Collaborative and externally funded projects<br />

i. <strong>National</strong> Referral Laboratory <strong>for</strong> monitoring pesticide residues <strong>for</strong> export of table grapes<br />

from India to EU countries<br />

(P. G. Adsule, K. Banerjee, A. K. Upadhyay, S. D. Sawant, R. G. Somkuwar, Anuradha Upadhyay,<br />

S. D. Ramteke, N. S. Kulkarni)<br />

This was the fourth year of the Residue Monitoring Plan, initiated by the APEDA in 2003-04 with<br />

<strong>National</strong> <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Centre</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Grapes</strong>, Pune through the <strong>National</strong> Referral Laboratory set-up under<br />

this institute. Presently three state Governments viz. Maharashtra, Andhra Pradesh and Karnataka<br />

are covered under this plan since exportable grapes are produced in these states. The farms from<br />

where table grapes are to be exported are registered with the Agricultural Departments of the<br />

respective grape growing states. The total registered farms <strong>for</strong> export of table grapes as per our<br />

records in these states were 16927 during 2006-07. Out of these farms, 16473 farms were from<br />

Maharashtra alone and 364 and 90 farms from Andhra Pradesh and Karnataka, respectively. The<br />

total area registered <strong>for</strong> export of table grapes was about 11323.88 hectares as against the estimated<br />

acreage of 60,000 hectare in the country.<br />

A total of 5751 samples were analysed in nominated laboratories during this period. Initially 787<br />

Alerts were issued out of which 168 alerts were subsequently withdrawn on the basis of the resample<br />

analyses reports. Out of the 619 effective alerts, Maharashtra accounted <strong>for</strong> the highest number of<br />

alerts (596) followed by Andhra Pradesh (20) and Karnataka (3). Within Maharashtra, Nasik district<br />

accounted <strong>for</strong> the 412 alerts followed by Sangli (79), Latur (33), Ahmednagar (24), Pune (15), Satara<br />

(14), Solapur (11), Osmanabad (7) and Beed (1). In Andhra Pradesh, the alerts were mostly from<br />

Ranga Reddy (16) and Medak (4) districts. In Karnataka, alerts were issued from Bellary (3) district.<br />

In all, there were 49 pesticides <strong>for</strong> which MRL exceedance was noticed. A maximum of 182 alerts<br />

were issued <strong>for</strong> Buprofezin followed by thiamethoxam (143), flusilazole (97), methomyl (75),<br />

imidacloprid (35), spinosad (31), chlorpyriphos (25), carbendazim (20), lambda-cyhalothrin (17),<br />

oxydemeton-methyl (14), hexaconazole (11), dimethomorph (9), thiophanate-methyl (8), 4-bromo-2-<br />

chlorophenol (7), acephate (7), acetamiprid (7), iprobenphos (7), clothianidin (6), ethofenprox (6),<br />

ethylene thiourea (6), thiacloprid (6), triazophos (6), cypermethrin (5), monocrotophos (5),<br />

difenconazole (4), dimethoate(including omethoate) (4), fipronil (4), methamidophos (4), captafol (3),<br />

captan (3), chlorpyriphos-methyl (3), myclobutanil(3), propiconazole (3), cartap hydrochloride (2),<br />

dicofol (2), propargite (2), atrazine (1), diazinon (1), dichlorvos (1), flufenoxuron (1), metalaxyl (1),<br />

parathion-ethyl (1), parathion-methyl (1), permethrin (1) and quinalphos (1). However, in case of<br />

buprofezin (98), thiamethoxam (135), flusilazole (62) and imidacloprid (35) the alert was pertaining<br />

to the Germany only.<br />

On critical perusal of the results of the residue monitoring in 2006-07, it is evident that the<br />

percentage of the failed samples has reduced significantly from 23.69% to 12.43% in 2003-04 to<br />

2004-05 and 7.16% in 2005-06, which has further reduced to 6.76% in the current season of<br />

2006-07. This clearly shows the improvement in the management of pesticide residues in grapes at<br />

the country level through the implementation of this Residue Monitoring Program.<br />

| 30 |


Collaborative, Externally Funded, Contract <strong>Research</strong> and Consultancy Projects<br />

The centre prepared list of recommended chemicals and list of chemicals to be monitored <strong>for</strong><br />

guidance of the growers and monitoring of residues, respectively. The centre also monitored the<br />

nominated laboratories <strong>for</strong> compliance of good laboratory practices through regular inspection and<br />

guidance. During chain from field to packhouse be<strong>for</strong>e shipment, samples were randomly drawn and<br />

reanalyzed at NRL to cross-check the compliance to the standard operating procedures.<br />

<br />

Technology Assessed and Transferred<br />

Several technologies have been developed and assessed at the Institute during last three years.<br />

Some of the important technologies are<br />

1. Use of rootstocks <strong>for</strong> sustainable grape production under abiotic stress<br />

2. Irrigation schedule<br />

3. Rationalisation of fertilizer use<br />

4. Use of mulch and subsurface irrigation under water deficit conditions<br />

5. Use of bioregulators <strong>for</strong> improving grape quality<br />

6. Strategies <strong>for</strong> insect pest and disease management during last 50 days be<strong>for</strong>e harvest.<br />

7. Use of biocontrol agents<br />

8. Disease <strong>for</strong>ecasting based disease management<br />

The scientists disseminated these technologies to the grape growers through several field visits and<br />

participation in growers' seminar.<br />

Farm Visits<br />

Dr. N. S. Kulkarni visited vineyards at Tuljapur and Solapur on 25 th April and 20 th August 2006<br />

respectively to assess the mealybug incidence and suggested preventive measures. As a part of IPM<br />

of Mealybug, Ladybird beetles were released Bangalore in a vineyard of Tuljapur on 18 th September<br />

2006 in collaboration with Maharashtra State Grape Growers' Association and Project Directorate<br />

of Biological Control, Bangalore.<br />

Dr. S. D. Ramteke surveyed grape gardens in and around Chikhali area on 28 th May 2006 to<br />

understand the impact of high temperature prevailing in this region on vine growth and fruitfulness<br />

in grape after April pruning.<br />

Dr. J. Satisha visited cold storage units of Sangli region on 2 nd June 2006 to collect samples of<br />

raisins <strong>for</strong> their quality analysis and also to collect data on the raisin production and capacity of cold<br />

storages.<br />

| 31 |


NRC <strong>for</strong> <strong>Grapes</strong> | Annual Report 2006-07<br />

Dr. R. G. Somkuwar visited Tamil Nadu to study the grape vineyards in and around Cumbum valley<br />

<strong>for</strong> cultural practices followed by the grape growers of Tamil Nadu state during 19-22 nd August<br />

2006.<br />

Dr. S. D. Ramteke visited vineyards of Satana and Kalwan area <strong>for</strong> bunch development and early<br />

crop on 29 th November 2006.<br />

Dr. S. D. Ramteke, Dr. S. D. Sawant and Dr. J. Sharma visited vineyards in and around Solapur<br />

especially in the Akkalkot area from 15 th to 17 th December 2006 affected by toxicity as per the<br />

instructions of Director and collected samples <strong>for</strong> analysis at the <strong>Centre</strong><br />

Dr. S. D. Ramteke surveyed grape vineyards in Solapur, Nasik and Sangli area <strong>for</strong> pink berry<br />

incidence on 8 th January, 7 th February and 12 th February 2007 respectively.<br />

Dr. G. S. Karibasappa and Dr. Anuradha Upadhyay visited vineyard in Kalamb, near Narayangaon<br />

on 17 th January 2007 to verify a clonal selection from Sharad Seedless and planned future<br />

experiments.<br />

Dr. P. G. Adsule, Director, Dr. G. S . Karibasappa, Dr. J. Sharma and Dr. J. Satisha visited Nimbkar<br />

Agricultural <strong>Research</strong> Institute, Phaltan on 29 th March 2007 to see the per<strong>for</strong>mance of newly<br />

introduced varieties under APEDA sponsored trial and advised Local Coordinator to control the<br />

vigour of Red Globe and Crimson Seedless to increase fruitfulness by spraying cycocel, to reduce the<br />

application of nitrogen fertilizers and to withheld irrigation <strong>for</strong> few days.<br />

Dr. S. D. Sawant and Dr. Indu S. Sawant along with Dr. J. M. Khilari, President, Maharashtra State<br />

Grape Growers' Association surveyed vineyards of wine varieties <strong>for</strong> presence of virus diseases in<br />

Nasik, Baramati and Narayangaon during February - March 2007. Grape growers were advised to<br />

plant only certified disease free plants as virus diseases mainly spread to vineyards through planting<br />

material. Growers were also advised to control mealybugs well as it has potential to transmit diseases.<br />

Participation in Growers' Seminar<br />

Dr. S. D. Sawant, Dr. R. G. Somkuwar, Dr. A. K. Upadhyay, Dr. S. D. Ramteke, Dr. J. Sharma and<br />

Dr. N. S. Kulkarni participated in the Charchasatra organized by Maharashtra State Grape Growers'<br />

Association at Sangli on 24 th April, Nasik on 27 th April, Narayangaon on 28 th April and Solapur on<br />

9 th May 2006 and guided the growers on the vineyard practices to be followed after April pruning.<br />

Dr. R. G. Somkuwar delivered lecture on cultural practices and canopy management in the seminars<br />

organized by different agencies at Jalna, Amdapur, Golegaon, Junnar, Jath, Dindori, Baramati, Nasik<br />

on 3 rd April, 21 st April, 28 th April, 17 th June, 23 rd June, 27 th July 2006, 7 th August and 25 th<br />

August 2006 respectively.<br />

Dr. S. D. Ramteke delivered lectures on 'Judicious use of growth regulators in grape' in seminars<br />

organised by different agencies at Jalna, Loni (Pravaranagar), Solapur, Junnar and Nasik on 2 nd<br />

April, 21 st April and 10 th May 2006 and 17 th June, 4 th September and 14 th September 2006<br />

respectively.<br />

Dr. R. G. Somkuwar visited grape vineyards at Niphad and delivered lecture on 'Cane development<br />

after back pruning in grape' in the seminar organized by SBI Project Uptech - <strong>Grapes</strong> at Niphad on<br />

7 th June 2006.<br />

| 32 |


Technology Assessed and Transferred<br />

Dr. S. D. Ramteke participated in group discussion on 'Bio- algeen S-90' organised by Pro-Agro Ltd.,<br />

Mumbai. <strong>for</strong> the growers at Nasik on 17 th May 2006.<br />

Dr. R. G. Somkuwar and Dr. J. Satisha delivered lecture on 'Role of canopy in production of export<br />

quality grapes' and 'Use of rootstocks in viticulture' respectively in the seminar organized under SBI<br />

Project Uptech - <strong>Grapes</strong> at Jath, Sangli on 17 th June 2006.<br />

The Director and all the scientists of the <strong>Centre</strong> participated in an Annual Seminar of Maharashtra<br />

State Grape Growers' Association at Pune on 25-26 th September 2006.<br />

Dr. S. D. Ramteke delivered lecture on 'Judicious use of growth regulators in grape' at Shrigonda<br />

organized by Agro won and grape growers association, Shrigonda on 3 rd October 2006.<br />

Dr. S. D. Ramteke delivered lecture on 'Judicious use of growth regulators in grape' on 12 th October<br />

2006 at Junnar organized by Abhinav Grape Growers Association.<br />

Dr. S. D. Ramteke delivered lecture on 'Use of bioregulators in grapes' on 15 th November 2006 at<br />

Osmanabad organized by Maharashtra State Grape Growers' Association.<br />

Participation in Field Day<br />

Dr. P. G. Adsule, Director, Dr. Indu. S. Sawant, Dr.<br />

S. D. Sawant, Dr. R.G. Somkuwar, Dr. A. K.<br />

Upadhyay, Dr. K. Banerjee, Dr. S. D. Ramteke, Dr.<br />

J. Sharma and Dr. N. S. Kulkarni attended and<br />

participated in the discussion in the 'Field Day'<br />

conducted at growers' vineyard near Manur, Tal.<br />

Kalvan, Dist. Nasik on 29 th November 2006. Mr.<br />

Ashok Gaikwad, President, Nasik Division of Maharashtra State Grape Growers' Association along<br />

with many directors was present on this occasion. About 150 growers from Kalvan and Satana<br />

participated in the Field Day. About 8 new chemicals / <strong>for</strong>mulations were tested at this site <strong>for</strong><br />

control of downy mildew. Demonstration of disease <strong>for</strong>ecasting system, software controlled<br />

automatic irrigation system and use of new efficient spraying system was also shown to the farmers.<br />

Farmers shared their experience in deliberations with scientists. Scientists clarified the doubts of<br />

growers related to water management, nutrition, insect and disease management, canopy<br />

management and use of growth regulators.<br />

Participation in exhibition<br />

Dr. R. G. Somkuwar participated in 4 th <strong>National</strong> Exhibition organized by Yashwant Krishi Audyogik<br />

and Pashu Paskhi from 24-28 th November 2006 at Karad, Distt. Sangli.<br />

In house discussions<br />

Approximately 800 farmers visited the <strong>Centre</strong> during this year to seek advise, consultancy <strong>for</strong> their<br />

problems being faced in the grape vineyard from the scientists of this <strong>Centre</strong> apart from collection<br />

of improved plant varieties / rootstocks.<br />

Video Programme<br />

Dr. P. G. Adsule, Dr. S. D. Sawant, Dr. R. G. Somkuwar, Dr. S. D. Ramteke and Dr. J. Sharma<br />

participated in the video conferencing telecasted to the grape growers of Sangli and Nasik from<br />

October 2006 to March 2007.<br />

| 33 |


Education and Training<br />

Visits Abroad<br />

Dr. A. K. Upadhyay and Dr. K. Banerjee were nominated to attend 120 th AOAC International<br />

Meeting of AOAC held at Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA during 17-22 nd September 2006 and<br />

presented a paper entitled 'Multi-residue screening of 100 pesticides in grapes by gas<br />

chromatography - mass spectrometry and liquid chromatography - tandem mass spectrometry. They<br />

also visited analytical R&D facility of the Dow, an organizational affiliate of the AOAC and had<br />

interaction with the working groups of the AOAC and allied organizations involved in residue<br />

analysis.<br />

Training Acquired<br />

Sl.<br />

Name<br />

No.<br />

I. Scientific staff<br />

Training Title Period Organized by<br />

1 Dr. G.S.<br />

Karibasappa<br />

2 Dr. Anuradha<br />

Upadhyay<br />

III. Administrative staff<br />

Launching ceremony and training<br />

on Plant Variety Registration'<br />

under the PPV & FRA 2001<br />

launched by Shri Sharad Pawar,<br />

Hon'ble Minister of Agriculture,<br />

CA, F & PD, Govt. of India<br />

Genetic Analyser<br />

20-21 st<br />

February 2007<br />

19-21 st<br />

February 2007<br />

NASC Complex, New<br />

Delhi.<br />

at Genomics and<br />

Proteomics facility of<br />

Labindia Pvt. Ltd. at<br />

Gurgaon<br />

3<br />

4<br />

Mr. A.<br />

Srinivasamurthy<br />

Mr. N. S. Pathan<br />

IT Sensitisation training<br />

programme <strong>for</strong> Finance Officers /<br />

Officials of Western Zone<br />

26-30 th June<br />

2006<br />

Central Institute of<br />

Fisheries Education,<br />

Mumbai<br />

5 Mr. A.<br />

Srinivasamurthy<br />

Critical Areas of Service Rules<br />

18-22 nd<br />

December 2006<br />

Prasam Institute of<br />

Statutory Rules, Bangalore<br />

6 Mr. N. S. Pathan 2006 Bangalore<br />

Training Given<br />

<strong>National</strong> fruit fly surveillance training programme<br />

Dr. P. G. Adsule, Director, Dr. S. D. Sawant and Dr. N. S. Kulkarni organized the <strong>National</strong> Fruit Fly<br />

Surveillance Training Programme at Navasari Agricultural University, Navasari, Gujarat during<br />

11-15 th April 2006.<br />

Advances in management of nutrients, pests and pesticide residues<br />

A training programme on "Advances in management of nutrients, pests and pesticide residues" was<br />

organised on 27 th July 2006, <strong>for</strong> field officers of a private sector company to upgrade their<br />

knowledge on latest in<strong>for</strong>mation in specified subjects of viticulture. Dr. Indu S. Sawant coordinated<br />

the training programme.<br />

| 34 |


Education and Training<br />

Production of export quality grapes<br />

A three day training programme was organized on "Production of export Quality grapes" from<br />

21-23 rd November 2006 to 21 officers and field staff of Field Fresh Foods Pvt. Ltd, Pune. The<br />

training programme included all aspects of viticulture like global grape scenario, varieties suitable <strong>for</strong><br />

export, use of rootstocks, water management, nutrient management, canopy management, use of<br />

growth regulators, disease management, insect pest management, pre and post harvest handling,<br />

monitoring pesticide residues etc. including filed demonstration. Dr. J. Satisha coordinated the<br />

training programme.<br />

Communicating skills <strong>for</strong> researchers<br />

A training programme on 'Communicating Skills <strong>for</strong> <strong>Research</strong>ers' was organised on 8 th February<br />

2007. Mr. Yateendra Joshi, Senior Fellow, World Institute of Sustainable Energy, Pune who has<br />

more than 15 years of progressive experience in science publishing and has an internationally<br />

acclaimed book 'Communicating in Style' was called as the resource person. Dr. Indu S. Sawant<br />

coordinated the programme.<br />

Summer training<br />

Name of<br />

scientists<br />

Dr. Indu S.<br />

Sawant<br />

Dr. S. D.<br />

Sawant<br />

Title of the training<br />

M.Sc. (Microbiology) dissertation<br />

titled "Effect of cultural conditions<br />

on growth and sporulation of<br />

Botryodiplodia theobromae"<br />

Monitoring wine fermentation and<br />

isolation, characterization and<br />

evaluation of yeast<br />

Duration<br />

No. of<br />

students<br />

Institution<br />

6 months One Yashwantrao Mohite College<br />

(Bharathi Vidyapeeth Deemed<br />

University), Pune<br />

6 months Two Yashwantrao Mohite College<br />

(Bharathi Vidyapeeth Deemed<br />

University), Pune<br />

Dr. Anuradha<br />

Upadhyay<br />

B.Sc. (Applied Biotechnology) 6 months Two Vidya Pratishthan's School of<br />

Biotechnology, Baramati<br />

Resource persons <strong>for</strong> miscellaneous training programmes<br />

• Scientists of the <strong>Centre</strong> delivered lectures in the discipline of their specialization during training<br />

programmes organized by Maharashtra State Grape Growers' Association in two batches of 15<br />

days each in June-July 2006 About 65 young farmers from Maharashtra were imparted training<br />

on various facets of viticulture.<br />

<br />

| 35 |


Awards and Recognitions<br />

Dr. P. G. Adsule, Director was awarded by the 'MRDBS<br />

Gauravchinh' during their Annual Seminar on 25 th<br />

September 2006 <strong>for</strong> this contribution in organizing the<br />

International Symposium on Grape Production and<br />

Processing at Baramati from 6-11 th February 2006.<br />

Dr. Indu S. Sawant was honoured by the Maharashtra<br />

State Grape Growers' Association during their Annual<br />

Seminar on 25 th September 2006 <strong>for</strong> her contribution in<br />

organising the International Symposium on Grape<br />

Production and Processing at Baramati from 6-11 th<br />

February 2006 as the Organising Secretary of the<br />

Symposium.<br />

Dr. J. Sharma, was honoured by the Maharashtra State<br />

Grape Growers' Association during their Annual Seminar<br />

on 25 th September 2006 by presenting 'MRDBS<br />

Gauravchinh' <strong>for</strong> his contribution in nutrient<br />

management of grapevine.<br />

Dr. R. G. Somkuwar received 'Abhinav Gaurav of the<br />

year 2006' from Abhinav Grape Growers' Association,<br />

Junnar <strong>for</strong> his contribution in viticulture.<br />

Linkages and Collaboration including<br />

Externally Funded Projects<br />

Collaborating and Externally Funded Projects<br />

i. Development of molecular markers linked to downy mildew resistance in grape. (Sub-project of<br />

ICAR Network project on 'Molecular Breeding').<br />

ii. Introduction, evaluation, multiplication and supply of grape varieties suitable <strong>for</strong> export (APEDA).<br />

iii.<br />

iv.<br />

<strong>National</strong> Referral Laboratory <strong>for</strong> Monitoring Pesticide Residues <strong>for</strong> Export of Fresh <strong>Grapes</strong> from<br />

India (APEDA).<br />

Use of Plastic covers in vineyards to improve export per cent of grapes (APEDA).<br />

| 36 |


Publications<br />

<strong>Research</strong> Articles<br />

1. Bhargava B. S., Kalbhor J. N., Deshmukh S. U. and Sharma J. 2006. Deteriorating ground<br />

water quality used <strong>for</strong> irrigating grapes. Indian Journal of Horticulture 63(3) : 235-239.<br />

2. Kulkarni N. S., Sawant Indu S. and Sawant S. D. 2006. Bio-efficacy of methomyl 40 SP on<br />

mealy bugs Maconellicoccus hirsutus in grapes and its compatibility with Verticillium lecanii<br />

and Trichoderma harzianum. Pestology. 30(10) : 49-52.<br />

3. Kulkarni N. S., Sawant Indu S., Sawant S. D. and Adsule P. G. 2007. Bio-efficacy of herbal<br />

extract derived from Nerium odorum and Bombax malabaricum (Praghat+) on mealy bugs<br />

(Maconellicoccus hirsutus) and its effect on shelf life of Trichoderma treated grapes. J. of Eco-<br />

Friendly Agriculture. 2(1) : 49-52.<br />

4. Ramteke S. D. and Somkuwar R. G. 2006. Effect of stage and concentration of GA 3 and<br />

Carbaryl on cluster compactness in Tas-A-Ganesh on 1613C rootstock. Journal of Maharashtra<br />

Agric. Univ., 31(2) : 237-238.<br />

5. Ramteke S. D., Somkuwar R. G. and Shikhamany S. D. 2006. Effect of stage and concentration<br />

of GA 3 and Carbaryl on cluster compactness in Tas-A-Ganesh on 1613 C rootstock. Mah. J.<br />

Agric. Uni. 31(3) : 364-365.<br />

6. Satisha J. and Prakash G. S. 2006. The influence of water and gas exchange parameters on<br />

grafted grapevines under conditions of moisture stress. South African Journal of Enology and<br />

Viticulture. 27(1) : 40-45.<br />

7. Satisha J., Prakash G. S. and Palaniappan R. 2006. Water use efficiency, specific leaf weight<br />

and mineral composition of grape varieties, rootstocks and budded vines under moisture stress<br />

conditions. Annals of Plant and Soil <strong>Research</strong>. 8(2) : 25-128.<br />

8. Satisha J., Shikhamany S. D. and Somkuwar R. G. 2006. A study on in situ grafting of Tas-A-<br />

Ganesh on different rootstocks. Maharashtra J. Agric. Univ., 31(2) : 223-225.<br />

9. Satisha J., Prakash G. S. and Venugopalan R. 2006. Statistical modelings of water use efficiency<br />

with physio-biochemical parameters of grape rootstocks, genotypes and budded grapevines<br />

under soil moisture stress conditions. Turkish J. Agriculture and Forestry, 30(4) : 261-271.<br />

10. Satisha J., Prakash G. S., Bhatt R.M and Sampath Kumar P. 2007. Physiological mechanisms<br />

of water use efficiency of grape rootstocks under moisture stress conditions. International<br />

Journal of Agricultural <strong>Research</strong>. 2(2) : 159-164.<br />

11. Satisha J., Prakash G. S., Murti G.S.R. and Upreti K.K. 2006. Response of grape rootstocks to<br />

soil moisture stress. Journal of Horticultural Sciences. 1(1) : 19-23.<br />

12. Satisha J., Shikhamany S. D., Somkuwar R. G. 2006. Studies on inverted bottleneck symptoms<br />

in grapevines raised on rootstocks. Indian Journal of Horticulture, 63(3) : 240-243.<br />

| 37 |


NRC <strong>for</strong> <strong>Grapes</strong> | Annual Report 2006-07<br />

13. Sharma J., Shikhamany S. D., Satisha J. and Raghupathi B. 2006. Diagnosis of nutrient<br />

imbalances in bunch stem necrosis affected Thompson Seedless grapes grafted on Dogridge<br />

rootstocks using DRIS. Indian Journal of Horticulture. 63(2) : 139-144.<br />

14. Somkuwar R. G. and Ramteke S. D. 2006. Evaluation of grape genotypes <strong>for</strong> shelf life. Ann.<br />

Plant Physiol. 19(2) : 133-136.<br />

15. Somkuwar R. G. and Ramteke S. D. 2006. Evaluation of grape varieties <strong>for</strong> yield and quality<br />

attributes. PKV Res. J. 30(1) : 23-24.<br />

16. Somkuwar R. G. and Ramteke S. D. 2006. Standardization of concentration and season <strong>for</strong><br />

maximum plantlets from grape rootstock. PKV Res. J. 30(1) : 111 - 112.<br />

17. Somkuwar R. G. and Ramteke S. D. 2006. Yield and quality in relation to different crop loads<br />

on Tas- A-Ganesh table grapes (Vitis vinifera L.) Journal of Plant Sciences. 1(2) : 176-181.<br />

18. Somkuwar R. G., Ramteke S. D. and Satisha J. 2006 Effect of Diameter on growth and success<br />

of Dogridge rootstock cuttings. Maharashtra J. Agric. Univ., 31(2) : 237-238.<br />

19. Somkuwar R. G., Satisha J. and Ramteke S. D. 2007. Standardization of propagation methods<br />

to raise grape vineyards on rootstock. Ad. Plant Sci. 20(1) : 107 - 109.<br />

20. Upadhyay Anuradha, Saboji Mamtha D., Reddy Suvarna, Deokar K. P. and Karibasappa G. S.<br />

2007. AFLP and SSR marker analysis of grape rootstocks in Indian grape germplasm. Scientia<br />

Horticulture. 112(2) : 176-183.<br />

21. Dhane, M.; Tamhnakar, S. A.; Patil, S. G.; Karibasappa, G. S. and Rao, V. S. 2006. Assessment<br />

of genetic diversity and relationship among some grape varieties using ISSR markers. Journal<br />

of applied Horticulture. 8(1) : 50-52.<br />

22. Nookaraju, A.; Barreto, M. S.; Karibasappa, G. S. and Agrawal, D. C. 2007. Synergetic effect<br />

of CPPU and benzyl adenine on embryo rescue in six stenospermocarpic cultivars of grape vine.<br />

Vitis. 46(4) : 188-199.<br />

23. Pakhale, S. S.; Karibasappa, G. S.; Asha, G. R.; Brij Bhushan and Sharma, A. 2007.<br />

Scavenging effect of Indian grape polyphenols on 2,2'-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical<br />

by electron spin resonance spectrometry. Indian Journal of Experimental Biology. 45(11) :<br />

968-974.<br />

Papers Presented at Symposia / Workshops / Meetings<br />

1. Banerjee K., Adsule P. G., Upadhyay A. K., Sawant S. D. and Kulkarni N. S. 2007. Multi-residue<br />

monitoring of pesticides in grapes. Lead paper presented in IIIrd <strong>National</strong> Symposium on 'Plant<br />

Protection in Horticulture: Emerging Trends and Challenges" March, 7-9 th 2007, Indian Institute<br />

of Horticultural <strong>Research</strong>, Bangalore.<br />

2. Jadhav Nutan T. and Sawant Indu S. 2007. Effect of cultural conditions on mycelial growth and<br />

pycnidia <strong>for</strong>mation by Botryodiplodia theobromae. In '<strong>National</strong> Symposium on Recent Trends<br />

in Life Sciences with Special Reference to Environmental Biotechnology & Biotechnology'<br />

February 10-12, 2007, Department of Zoology, Kusumtai Rajarambapu Patil Kanya<br />

Mahavidhalaya, Islampur, Sangli, MS.<br />

| 38 |


Publications<br />

3. Kulkarni N. S., Sawant Indu S. and Adsule P. G. 2006. Bio-efficacy of methomyl 40 SP on<br />

mealybugs, Maconellicoccus hirsutus in grapes and its compatibility with Verticillium lecanni<br />

and Trichoderma harzianum. In: <strong>National</strong> symposium on 'Improving Input Use Efficiency in<br />

Horticulture' organized by IIHR, Bangalore from 9-11 th August 2006. Abstr. No. 4.27: 195.<br />

4. Prakash G. S. and Satisha J. 2006. Enhancing water use efficiency through use of rootstocks.<br />

Paper presented in <strong>National</strong> Symposium on increasing the input use efficiency in horticultural<br />

crops (Lead Paper). Organized by IIHR, Bangalore from 9-11 th August 2006. pp: 10-11.<br />

5. Ramteke S. D., Satisha J. and Somkuwar R. G. 2006. Enhancing the bioefficacy of GA 3 by use<br />

of different adjuvant in Thompson Seedless grapes. In: <strong>National</strong> symposium on 'Improving Input<br />

Use Efficiency in Horticulture' organized by IIHR, Bangalore from 9-11 th August 2006. pp. 167.<br />

6. Sawant Indu S. and Sawant S. D. 2007. Association of Botryodiplodia theobromae with<br />

grapevines in India. In. III rd <strong>National</strong> Symposium on 'Plant Protection in Horticulture: Emerging<br />

Trends and Challenges" March, 7-9 th 2007, Indian Institute of Horticultural <strong>Research</strong>, Bangalore.<br />

OP-5, p3.<br />

7. Sawant S. D. and Sawant Indu S. 2007. Good Agricultural Practices and Integrated Disease<br />

Management in <strong>Grapes</strong>. <strong>National</strong> Seminar on "Recent Advances in Production, Protection and<br />

Post Harvest Management of Grape, Mandarin and Arid Fruits" at JNKVV - College of<br />

Horticulture, Mandsaur, MP,17-18 th , March 2007.<br />

8. Sawant S. D., Sawant Indu S. and Adsule P. G. 2007. Use of mineral oil <strong>for</strong>mulation <strong>for</strong> the<br />

control of powdery mildew in grapes. In. III <strong>National</strong> Symposium on 'Plant Protection in<br />

Horticulture: Emerging Trends and Challenges" March, 7-9 th 2007, Indian Institute of<br />

Horticultural <strong>Research</strong>, Bangalore. OP-4, p2-3.<br />

9. Sawant S. D., Sawant Indu S. and Kulkarni N. S. 2006. Improvement of efficiency of pesticides<br />

in grapes with addition of a non-ionic surfactant containing polyether polymethylsiloxane<br />

copolymer. In: <strong>National</strong> symposium on 'Improving Input Use Efficiency in Horticulture' organized<br />

by IIHR, Bangalore from 9-11 th August 2006. Abstr. No. 4.34: 200.<br />

10. Sharma J. 2006. Importance of tissue analysis and soil testing in horticultural crops. Paper<br />

presented In: Workshop on 'Enhancement of soil productivity' Organised by Maharshtra State<br />

Agriculture Department, Pune on 20-21-11-2006. Souvenir pp:147-155.<br />

11. Upadhyay A. K., Sharma J., Shikhamany S. D. and Singh R. K. 2006. Effect of mulch and antitranspirant<br />

on yield and water use efficiency in Tas-A-Ganesh (Vitis vinifera L.) vines grafted on<br />

Dogridge rootstock. In: <strong>National</strong> symposium on 'Improving Input Use Efficiency in Horticulture'<br />

organized by IIHR, Bangalore from 9-11 th August 2006. pp. 115.<br />

12. Upadhyay A. K., Sharma J., Shikhamany S. D. and Singh R. K.. 2006. Effect of irrigation levels<br />

on yield and water use efficiency of grafted and ungrafted surface drip irrigated Tas-A-Ganesh<br />

(Vitis vinifera L.). In: <strong>National</strong> symposium on 'Improving Input Use Efficiency in Horticulture'<br />

organized by IIHR, Bangalore from 9-11 th August 2006. pp. 115-116.<br />

| 39 |


NRC <strong>for</strong> <strong>Grapes</strong> | Annual Report 2006-07<br />

Technical Bulletins<br />

1. Somkuwar R. G., Satisha J., Taware P. B. and Adsule P. G. 2006. Raising grapes on rootstocks<br />

(in Marathi). Technical Bulletin No. 6, NRC <strong>for</strong> <strong>Grapes</strong>, Pune. Pp: 23 (2 nd Edition)<br />

Extension Bulletin<br />

1. Sawant S. D., Sawant Indu S., Kulkarni N. S. and Mani M. 2006. Disease and insect pest<br />

management in grapes in two pruning and one cropping system. Extension Bulletin No. 1<br />

Technical Folders<br />

1. Somkuwar R. G., Upadhyay A. K., Adsule P. G. and Taware P. B. (August 2006). Vineyard<br />

establishment - A guide to cultural practices. Folder No. 5.<br />

2. Somkuwar R. G. (August, 2006). Initial Care and maintenance of grafted vines up to cane<br />

development. Folder No. 6.<br />

3. Somkuwar R. G. (August, 2006). Role of canopy in production of exportable quality grapes -<br />

Do's and Don'ts. Folder No. 7.<br />

4. Somkuwar R. G., Ramteke, S. D. Sharma J., Upadhyay A. K., Sawant S. D., Kulkarni N. S.,<br />

Adsule P. G. and Taware P. B. 2007. Some tips on Forward Pruning. Folder No. 8.<br />

5. Somkuwar R. G. and Ramteke, S. D. 2007. Bunch Development through Canopy Management<br />

and Growth Regulators. Folder No. 9.<br />

Other Publications<br />

1. Adsule P. G., Upadhyay Anuradha, Sawant Indu S., Somkuwar R. G. Sharma, J. and Ramteke<br />

S. D. 2006. Annual Report 2005-06. <strong>National</strong> <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Centre</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Grapes</strong>, Pune.<br />

2. Adsule P. G., Upadhyay Anuradha, Sawant Indu S. and Satisha J., 2006. Vision 2025. <strong>National</strong><br />

<strong>Research</strong> <strong>Centre</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Grapes</strong>, Pune.<br />

3. Adsule P. G., Satisha J., Upadhyay Anuradha and Sawant Indu S. 2007. EFC Document <strong>for</strong> XI<br />

Plan, NRC <strong>for</strong> <strong>Grapes</strong>, Pune.<br />

Video CD<br />

1. ‘<strong>National</strong> <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Centre</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Grapes</strong> - First decade in the Service of Indian Grape Industry’<br />

Video Film (20 minutes) depicting the activities and resources of the <strong>Centre</strong>. <strong>National</strong> <strong>Research</strong><br />

<strong>Centre</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Grapes</strong>, Pune.<br />

<br />

| 40 |


Meetings of QRT, RAC, IMC, SRC with<br />

Significant Decisions<br />

<strong>Research</strong> Advisory Committee (RAC) Meeting<br />

Following are the members of RAC :<br />

1. Dr. G. L. Kaul, Ex VC, Assam Agricultural University, Jorhat - Chairman<br />

2. Dr. R. M. Pandey, Ex-Director, IIHR, Bangalore - Member<br />

3. Dr. Y. R. Sarma, Ex-Director, IISR, Calicut - Member<br />

4. Dr. R. P. Srivastava, Ex-Principal Scientist, CISH, Lucknow - Member<br />

5. Dr. S. N. Sharma, Prof. & Head, Department of Agronomy, - Member<br />

BHU, Varanasi<br />

6. Dr. S. N. Pandey, Asstt. Director General (Hort.), ICAR, New Delhi - Member<br />

7. Mr. Mahendra Shahir, President, MRDBS, Solapur Unit (IMC Member) - Member<br />

8. Mr. Balasaheb Gawade, Grape Grower, Baramati, Pune (IMC Member) - Member<br />

9. Dr. P. G. Adsule, Director, NRC <strong>for</strong> <strong>Grapes</strong>, Pune - Member<br />

10. Dr. G. S. Karibasappa Sr. Scientist, NRC <strong>for</strong> <strong>Grapes</strong>, Pune - Member Secretary<br />

The Eighth meeting of the <strong>Research</strong> Advisory Committee, of the <strong>Centre</strong> was held on 19-20 th July<br />

2006. Dr. G. L. Kaul, Ex VC, Assam Agricultural University, Jorhat chaired the meeting. The other<br />

members of the committee were Dr. S. N. Pandey, ADG (hort.), Dr. Y. R. Sarma, Ex-Director, IISR,<br />

Calicut; Dr. R. M. Pandey, Ex-Director, IIHR, Bangalore; Dr. R. P. Srivastava Ex-Principal Scientist,<br />

CISH, Lucknow; Dr. S. N. Sharma; Prof. & Head, Department of Agronomy, BHU, Varanasi and<br />

Mr. Mahendra Shahir, President, MRDBS, Solapur Unit (IMC Member). All the scientists of the<br />

<strong>Centre</strong> participated in the meeting. During the meeting, action taken report on last RAC and<br />

progress report of ongoing projects was presented. During the meeting, project were reclassified into<br />

programme mode. The committee also suggested that the researchable issues which had emerged<br />

during the deliberations in the International Symposium on Grape Production and Processing should<br />

be noted <strong>for</strong> future guidance.<br />

The Ninth meeting of the <strong>Research</strong> Advisory Committee, of the <strong>Centre</strong> was convened on 23-24 th<br />

March 2007. Dr. G. L. Kaul, Ex Vice-Chancellor, Assam Agricultural University, Jorhat chaired the<br />

meeting. The other members of the committee who attended were Dr. R. M. Pandey, Ex-Director,<br />

IIHR, Bangalore; Dr. R. P. Srivastava Ex-Principal Scientist, CISH, Lucknow; Dr. S. N. Sharma; Prof.<br />

& Head, Department of Agronomy, BHU, Varanasi and Mr. Mahendra Shahir, Vice-President,<br />

Maharashtra State Grape Growers' Association, Pune (IMC Member). Dr. J.M. Khilari, President,<br />

Maharashtra State Grape Growers' Association also participated in the concluding session of the<br />

meeting. All the scientists of the <strong>Centre</strong> participated in the meeting. During the meeting, action taken<br />

report on last RAC and progress report of ongoing projects was reviewed by the Committee and<br />

suggestions were offered <strong>for</strong> further improvement.<br />

| 41 |


NRC <strong>for</strong> <strong>Grapes</strong> | Annual Report 2006-07<br />

Institute Management Committee (IMC) Meeting<br />

Following are the members of IMC<br />

1. Dr. P. G. Adsule, Director NRC <strong>Grapes</strong>, Pune - Chairman<br />

2. Dr. M. Mani, Principal Scientist, NRC <strong>Grapes</strong>, Pune - Member<br />

3. Dr. V. S. R. K. Prasad, Principal Scientist, NRC <strong>for</strong> O & G, Rajgurunagar - Member<br />

4. Dr. Indu S. Sawant, Sr. Scientist, NRC <strong>Grapes</strong>, Pune - Member<br />

5. Dr. Pious Thomas, Sr. Scientist, IIHR, Bangalore - Member<br />

6. Mr. O. Babu, AAO, NRC <strong>Grapes</strong>, Pune - Member Secretary<br />

The 21 st and 22 nd meetings of Institute Management Committee of the <strong>Centre</strong> were held on 6 th July<br />

2006 and 20 th February 2007 respectively, under the Chairmanship of Dr. P. G. Adsule, Director.<br />

Institute <strong>Research</strong> Committee (IRC) Meeting<br />

The 11 th meeting of Institute <strong>Research</strong> Committee of the <strong>Centre</strong> was held on 28-29 th September<br />

2006 under the Chairmanship of Dr. P. G. Adsule, Director.<br />

First Advisory Committee meeting of APEDA-NRL on 4 th August 2006<br />

An advisory committee was constituted under the<br />

Chairmanship of Dr. C. D. Mayee, Chairman, ASRB to<br />

monitor the progress and achievements of the Pesticide<br />

Residue Monitoring Plan (RMP) of the <strong>National</strong> Referral<br />

Laboratory (NRL) since its inception from 2003 under<br />

the APEDA Act. A meeting was held at NRC <strong>Grapes</strong>,<br />

Pune on 4 th August 2006. The following members<br />

attended the meeting.<br />

1. Dr. A. G. Sawant, Ex-Member, ASRB, New Delhi<br />

2. Dr. S. P. Ghosh, Former DDG (Hort.), ICAR, New Delhi<br />

3. Dr. (Mrs.) Prem Dureja, Head, Division of Agril. Chemicals, IARI, New Delhi<br />

4. Shri Sopan Kanchan, Chairman, GGFI, Pune<br />

5. Dr. A. U. Ekbote, Former Dy. Director (Lab.), Govt. of Maharashtra<br />

6. Dr. Kaushik Banerjee, Sr. Scientist, NRC <strong>Grapes</strong>, Pune<br />

7. Dr. A. K. Upadhyay, Sr. Scientist, NRC <strong>Grapes</strong>, Pune<br />

8. Dr. P. G. Adsule, Director, NRC <strong>Grapes</strong>, Pune - Project Coordinator of the NRL in Maharashtra<br />

The meeting deliberated the progress and achievements made under the pesticide residue-monitoring<br />

plan in last three grape seasons i.e. 2003-04, 2004-05 and 2005-06 on 4 th August 2006 and made<br />

visit to one of the nominated laboratories under this programme in Pune city on 5 th August 2006.<br />

The committee made several recommendations regarding plot size, sampling and proficiency tests,<br />

which will be followed in coming season. Few of these have been worked out during this year and<br />

also implemented in the ongoing programme.<br />

<br />

| 42 |


Consultancy, Patents and<br />

Commercialization of Technology<br />

During the year, 25 new contract research projects, 14 consultancy programmes and 2 training<br />

programmes were approved.<br />

A first of its kind consultancy programme of advising the grape growers producing exportable grapes<br />

on general and specific current problems by scientists from NRC <strong>for</strong> <strong>Grapes</strong>, through video<br />

conferencing mode was developed by the Institute in consultation with all the parties concerned, and<br />

executed through a MoU. The sponsorer was M/s Field Fresh, a company engaged in export of<br />

grapes mainly from Nasik and Sangli region.<br />

Copyrights <strong>for</strong> two softwares developed by the scientists of the <strong>Centre</strong> were obtained<br />

1. Copyright Registration No. SW-3313/2006, dated 29/12/2006 on the work 'Grape<br />

Germplasm In<strong>for</strong>mation System'<br />

2. Copyright Registration No. SW-3312/2006, dated 29/12/2006 on the work 'NRCG-SKAI<br />

PMExpert, software <strong>for</strong> management of powdery mildew in Indian vineyards'<br />

Approved On-going Institute Projects<br />

The programme mode research is conducted under the following broad programmes<br />

1. Management of genetic resources of table, wine, raisin, juice and rootstock grape varieties<br />

2. Germplasm utilization and genetic enhancement<br />

3. Application of biotechnological research in grapes<br />

4. Development of propagation and nursery technology<br />

5. Use of rootstocks <strong>for</strong> grape cultivation<br />

6. Horticultural practices <strong>for</strong> quality and yield in table and wine grapes<br />

7. Nutrient and soil management in grapes<br />

8. Water management in grapes<br />

9. Grape physiology including use of bioregulators<br />

10. Studies on viticulturally important microorganisms<br />

11. Integrated disease management in grapes<br />

12. Integrated insect and mite pest management in grapes<br />

13. Management of agrochemical residues and environmental contaminants in grapes<br />

14. Development of post-harvest technologies<br />

15. Development of in<strong>for</strong>mation and documentation systems<br />

<br />

| 43 |


Participation of Scientists in Conference,<br />

Meetings, Workshops, Seminars, Symposia etc.<br />

Seminars / Symposia / Conferences<br />

Name of the<br />

scientist<br />

Seminars / Symposia /<br />

Conferences<br />

Duration<br />

Organized by and<br />

place<br />

Dr. N. S. Kulkarni<br />

<strong>National</strong> Symposium on Biological<br />

Control of Sucking Pests<br />

26-27 th May<br />

2006<br />

Project Directorate of<br />

Biological Control at<br />

Bangalore<br />

Dr. S. D. Sawant<br />

Dr A. K. Upadhyay<br />

Dr. S. D. Ramteke<br />

Improving Input Use Efficiency in<br />

Horticulture<br />

9-11 th August<br />

2006<br />

Indian Institute of<br />

Horticultural <strong>Research</strong>,<br />

Bangalore<br />

Dr. N.S. Kulkarni<br />

Dr. R. G. Somkuwar<br />

Advantages of grafted rootstocks<br />

<strong>for</strong> wine grape cultivation<br />

17 th August<br />

2006<br />

Mildura Vine Nursery Pvt.<br />

Ltd., Australia at Nasik<br />

Dr. S. D. Ramteke<br />

Food safety and grape success<br />

story<br />

3 rd November<br />

2006<br />

Bombay exhibition held at<br />

Goregaon East<br />

Dr. Indu S. Sawant<br />

III rd <strong>National</strong> Symposium on 'Plant<br />

Protection in Horticulture:<br />

Emerging Trends and Challenges'<br />

7-9 th March<br />

2007<br />

Indian Institute of<br />

Horticultural <strong>Research</strong>,<br />

Bangalore<br />

Workshops / Meetings<br />

Name of the<br />

scientist<br />

Seminars / Symposia /<br />

Conferences<br />

Duration<br />

Organized by and<br />

place<br />

Dr. Anuradha<br />

Upadhyay, Public<br />

In<strong>for</strong>mation Officer<br />

Right to In<strong>for</strong>mation Act- 2005<br />

18-19 th April<br />

2006<br />

<strong>National</strong> Academy of<br />

Agricultural <strong>Research</strong><br />

Management, Hyderabad<br />

Dr. Anuradha<br />

Upadhyay<br />

Association genetics- application<br />

and prospects in horticultural<br />

crops<br />

21-22 nd April<br />

2006.<br />

CPCRI, Kasargod<br />

Dr. J. Satisha,<br />

Assistant Public<br />

In<strong>for</strong>mation Officer<br />

Right to in<strong>for</strong>mation act- 2005<br />

25-26 th April<br />

2006<br />

<strong>National</strong> Academy of<br />

Agricultural <strong>Research</strong><br />

Management, Hyderabad<br />

Dr. K. Banerjee<br />

Dr. S. D. Ramteke<br />

Group Discussion on "Bio-algeen<br />

S-90" arranged <strong>for</strong> the growers<br />

17 th May 2006 Pro- Agro Ltd Mumbai at<br />

Nasik<br />

Dr. P. G. Adsule<br />

Dr. R. G. Somkuwar<br />

First meeting of Mega Seed<br />

Project and presented project on<br />

'Production of quality grape<br />

planting material'<br />

27-28 th June<br />

2006<br />

Directorate of Seed<br />

<strong>Research</strong>, New Delhi<br />

Dr. P. G. Adsule<br />

Dr. Indu S. Sawant<br />

Dr. J. Satisha<br />

Meeting on 'Quarantine issues <strong>for</strong><br />

importing plant material'<br />

26 th July 2006 Agro processing and<br />

Agribusiness,<br />

Commissionerate of<br />

Agriculture, Shivajinagar,<br />

Pune.<br />

| 44 |


Participation of Scientists in Conference, Meetings, Workshops, Seminars, Symposia etc.<br />

Name of the<br />

scientist<br />

Seminars / Symposia /<br />

Conferences<br />

Duration<br />

Organized by and<br />

place<br />

Dr. Anuradha<br />

Upadhyay<br />

Review meeting of Network<br />

project on Molecular breeding and<br />

presented the progress report of<br />

the subproject on grape.<br />

18 th August<br />

2006<br />

NBPGR, New Delhi<br />

Dr. G. S. Karibasappa<br />

Dr J. Satisha<br />

Sensitisation workshop on NAIP<br />

19 th August<br />

2006<br />

Central Institute of Fisheries<br />

Education, Mumbai<br />

Dr. P. G. Adsule<br />

Presentation of the draft report by<br />

MITCON <strong>for</strong> the <strong>for</strong>mation of<br />

Indian Grape and Wine Board<br />

16 th September<br />

2006<br />

Organized by MITCON at<br />

Mumbai<br />

Dr. Anuradha<br />

Upadhyay<br />

Dr. J. Satisha<br />

Discussion meeting with Dr. Minal<br />

Mhatre of Bhabha Atomic<br />

<strong>Research</strong> <strong>Centre</strong> to <strong>for</strong>mulate<br />

collaborative research project<br />

12 th October<br />

2006<br />

Nuclear and Agriculture<br />

Biotechnology Division,<br />

Bhabha Atomic <strong>Research</strong><br />

<strong>Centre</strong>, Mumbai<br />

Dr. Indu S. Sawant<br />

Dr. S. D. Sawant<br />

Brain storming session chaired by<br />

Dr. G. Kalloo, Ex. DDG (Hort. &<br />

CS) <strong>for</strong> <strong>for</strong>mulating an effective<br />

network project <strong>for</strong> the<br />

management of diseases and<br />

insect pests of onion and garlic<br />

16 th January<br />

2007<br />

NRC <strong>for</strong> Onion and Garlic<br />

at Rajgurunagar, Pune<br />

Dr. P. G. Adsule<br />

Dr. Indu S. Sawant<br />

Dr. S. D. Sawant<br />

Meeting to chalk out effective<br />

strategies to curtail the effect of<br />

diseases and pests in pomegranate<br />

and grapes.<br />

20 th January<br />

2007<br />

Department of Agriculture<br />

Sugae Complex, Pune<br />

Dr. N. S. Kulkarni<br />

Dr. P. G. Adsule<br />

Dr. M. Mani<br />

Dr. G. S. Karibasappa<br />

Dr. Indu S. Sawant<br />

One day interactive workshop<br />

presided over by Dr. H.P. Singh,<br />

Dy. Director General (Hort), ICAR<br />

to chalk out effective strategies to<br />

manage the effect of diseases and<br />

pests in pomegranate and grapes.<br />

24 th February<br />

2007<br />

Vaikunth Mehta <strong>National</strong><br />

Institute of Cooperative<br />

Management, Pune<br />

Dr. S. D. Sawant<br />

Dr. S. D. Ramteke<br />

Dr. N. S. Kulkarni<br />

<br />

| 45 |


Distinguished Visitors<br />

Dr. Mangala Rai, Secretary, DARE and Director General, ICAR along with Dr. R. B. Deshmukh, Vice<br />

Chancellor, MPKV, Rahuri visited the <strong>Centre</strong> on 21 st January, 2007. On the occasion a video film<br />

"<strong>National</strong> <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Centre</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Grapes</strong>: First Decade in the service of Indian Grape Industry" was<br />

released.<br />

A delegation comprising of Shri S. M. Desalfine, Additional Secretary (Agriculture), Ministry of<br />

Agriculture, Shri S. K. Pattnaik, Joint Secretary and Director, <strong>National</strong> Horticulture Mission, Govt.<br />

of India, New Delhi along with Shri V. D. Patil, Horticulture Commissioner, Govt. of Maharashtra<br />

visited the <strong>Centre</strong> on 22 nd September 2006.<br />

S. No. Name with Designation Organization Date<br />

1 Dr. A. K. Srivastava, Head, Plant Protection VPKAS, Almora 01/07/2006<br />

2 Mr. Pepmeres Lauviol & Tourette ERAI 04/10/2006<br />

3 Dr. J. C. Baskhi, Ex. Vice Chancellor RAU, Bikaner 09/03/2007<br />

4 Prof. K. V. Peter, Ex. Vice Chancellor KAU, Vellanikara, Thrissur 13/03/2007<br />

<strong>Research</strong> and Management Personnel<br />

1. Dr. P. G. Adsule, Director<br />

Infrastructure Development<br />

Laboratory<br />

Automatic Genetic Analyser, Microprocessor controlled BOD incubator were procured during the<br />

year.<br />

Library<br />

During the year 400 new accessions were added to the library.<br />

New Structures<br />

1. Biological Control Laboratory<br />

2. Exhibition Hall<br />

3. Farm Office<br />

| 46 |


Other Activities<br />

Celebrations<br />

qhXr [Idm∂S>>m Am°a qhXr H$m`©embm<br />

H{$›– _| 14 g{ 30 ogVÂ]a VH$ qhXr [Idm∂S>>m _Zm`m J`m $& H$m`©H´$_ H$m ew^ma‰_ S>m∞. [r. Or. AS>gwb{, oZX{eH$ Z{<br />

oH$`m & Bg Xm°amZ odo^fi ‡oV`m{oJVmAm| H$m Am`m{OZ oH$`m J`m $oOZ_| g^r AoYH$mna`m| Am°a H$_©Mmna`m| Z{ CÀgmh<br />

[yd©H$ ^mJ ob`m $& ‡ÌZm{Œmar, H$odVm[mR> Edß dmX oddmX ‡oV`m{oJVm _wª` AmH$f©U ah{ $& H$m`©H´$_ H{$ g_m[Z oXdg<br />

[a lr. Ama. [r. d_m©, ghm`H$ oZX{eH$, qhXr oejU `m{OZm, [wU{ _wª` AoVWr W{$& Cgr oXZ qhXr H$m`©embm H$m ^r<br />

Am`m{OZ oH$`m J`m$& oOg_| lr. Ama. [r. d_m© Z{ qhXr amO^mfm oZ`_mdbr Edß qhXr ‡`m{J H{$ obE odo^fi [waÒH$mam|<br />

g{ AdJV H$am`m, VWm gaH$mar H$m_H$mO _| AoYH$moYH$ qhXr H{$ ‡`m{J H{$ obE AmdÌ`H$ OmZH$mar Xr$&<br />

Institute Day<br />

The <strong>Centre</strong> celebrated its 10 th Institute Day on 18 th January 2007. All the staff participated in the<br />

fun games and Antakshari organized on this event. The celebration ended with the prize distribution<br />

and address by Dr. P. G. Adsule, Director of the institute.<br />

Republic Day<br />

The <strong>Centre</strong> celebrated Republic Day on 26 th January with joy and splendour. Dr. P. G. Adsule,<br />

Director, hoisted the flag. In his address, he called upon the staff to work towards betterment of the<br />

society in general and farming community in particular.<br />

Inauguration<br />

The newly constructed structures Biocontrol Laboratory,<br />

Farm Office building and Museum were inaugurated by<br />

Dr. C. D. Mayee, Chairman, ASRB, Dr. S. P. Ghosh,<br />

Former DDG (Hort.), ICAR, Dr. A. G. Sawant, Ex-<br />

Member, ASRB respectively on 4 th August 2006.<br />

Independence Day<br />

Dr. P. G. Adsule, Director hoisted the national flag on the occasion of Independence Day on 15 th<br />

August 2006. In his address, he urged all the staff of the <strong>Centre</strong> to work hard <strong>for</strong> upliftment of the<br />

farmers. During The children of the staff members who obtained first class or distinction in S.S.C.<br />

or H.S.C. examination were felicitated by offering cash prizes on this occasion.<br />

Vigilance Week<br />

Vigilance Week was observed from 6-11 th November 2006 with the address by the Director to the<br />

staff on the first day.<br />

Institute Committees<br />

To look after the various activities of the <strong>Centre</strong>, <strong>Research</strong> Management & Coordination Unit,<br />

Technical Cell, Publication Committee, Store Purchase Committee, Farm Management Committee,<br />

Library, Works, Photography, Sports activities, ARIS Cell, IRGS and Official Language<br />

Implementation Committeethe were in operation.<br />

| 47 |


Meteorological Data<br />

Year<br />

&<br />

Month<br />

Air temperature<br />

(°C)<br />

Relative Humidity<br />

(%)<br />

Min. Max. Min. Max.<br />

Pan<br />

evaporation<br />

(mm)<br />

Sunshine<br />

duration<br />

(hr.)<br />

Total<br />

rainfall<br />

(mm)<br />

No. of<br />

rainy<br />

days<br />

No. of rainy<br />

days with ><br />

4 mm rain*<br />

Apr 2006 17.18 38.19 19.63 90.27 6.93 10.58 2.40 8 0<br />

May 2006 22.65 37.29 31.90 83.97 6.75 12.20 100.40 7 2<br />

Jun 2006 21.83 32.62 62.53 99.80 2.78 11.78 114.40 17 5<br />

Jul 2006 21.85 28.42 84.00 99.97 1.32 11.63 150.60 28 11<br />

Aug 2006 21.16 28.22 83.94 100.00 0.74 11.27 205.00 28 10<br />

Sep 2006 20.80 31.27 68.87 100.00 1.58 10.92 164.00 18 7<br />

Oct 2006 19.04 31.49 51.94 99.97 2.48 10.87 56.00 7 5<br />

Nov 2006 16.19 29.77 55.17 100.00 2.28 10.33 17.00 16 2<br />

Dec 2006 9.82 30.61 40.77 100.00 2.83 9.89 1.20 5 0<br />

Jan 2007 9.98 31.94 36.00 99.94 3.19 9.40 0.40 2 0<br />

Feb 2007 11.25 33.36 28.18 99.25 4.26 10.18 0.60 2 0<br />

Mar 2007 13.65 36.90 20.87 91.35 5.11 10.81 1.00 3 0<br />

* Days with > 4 mm rainfall does not require irrigation<br />

Source : Weather station, NRC <strong>for</strong> <strong>Grapes</strong>, Pune<br />

| 48 |

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!