amÃâ >r` AÃJya AZwgÃYmZ H - National Research Centre for Grapes
amÃâ >r` AÃJya AZwgÃYmZ H - National Research Centre for Grapes
amÃâ >r` AÃJya AZwgÃYmZ H - National Research Centre for Grapes
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
amÔ≠><strong>r`</strong> AßJya AZwgßYmZ H{$›–<br />
<strong>National</strong> <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Centre</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Grapes</strong><br />
dmof©H$ ‡oVd{XZ Annual Report 2006-07
dmof©H$ ‡oVd{XZ Annual Report 2006-07<br />
amÔ≠><strong>r`</strong> AßJya AZwgßYmZ H{$›–<br />
(^maV<strong>r`</strong> H•$of AZwgßYmZ [nafX)<br />
S>mH$ [{Q>r gߪ`m 3, _mßOar \$m_© S>mH$Ka, gm{bm[ya am{S>, [wU{ - 412 307<br />
Phone : 020-26914245 • Fax : 020-26914246 • E-mail : nrcgrape.mah@nic.in<br />
<strong>National</strong> <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Centre</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Grapes</strong><br />
(Indian Council of Agricultural <strong>Research</strong>)<br />
P. B. No. 3, Manjri Farm P. O., Solapur Road, Pune - 412307<br />
Tel. : 020-26914245 • Fax : 020-26914246 • Email : nrcgrape.mah@nic.in
Correct Citation :<br />
Annual Report 2006-07<br />
<strong>National</strong> <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Centre</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Grapes</strong><br />
Manjri Farm P. O.<br />
Pune - 412 307, India<br />
Edited by :<br />
Dr. P.G. Adsule<br />
Dr. Anuradha Upadhyay<br />
Dr. Indu S. Sawant<br />
Dr. R. G. Somkuwar<br />
Dr. J. Sharma<br />
Dr. S. D. Ramteke<br />
Dr. A. K. Sharma<br />
Photo Credits :<br />
Dr. G. S. Karibasappa<br />
Dr. S. D. Sawant<br />
Dr. R. G. Somkuwar<br />
Hindi Translation :<br />
Dr. Anuradha Upadhyay<br />
Dr. A. K. Sharma<br />
Word Processing :<br />
Ms. Shailaja V. Satam<br />
Cover Page :<br />
Red Globe, Director General (ICAR) discussing with scientists of the<br />
institute, Rootstock propagation, DDG (Hort.) on visit of vineyard,<br />
Inhouse discussion on mealybug issue.<br />
Published by :<br />
Dr. P. G. Adsule<br />
Director, <strong>National</strong> <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Centre</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Grapes</strong>, Pune - 412307<br />
Printed at : Flamingo Business Systems, Telefax : 020-24214636
Contents<br />
1. Preface i<br />
2. H$m`©H$mar gmamße iii<br />
3. Executive Summary vi<br />
4. Introduction 1<br />
5. <strong>Research</strong> Achievements 3<br />
6. Collaborative, Externally Funded, Contract <strong>Research</strong> and Consultancy Projects 30<br />
7. Technology Assessed and Transferred 31<br />
8. Education and Training 34<br />
9. Awards and Recognitions 36<br />
10. Linkages and Collaboration Including Externally Funded Projects 36<br />
11. Publications 37<br />
12. Meetings of QRT, RAC, IMC, SRC with Significant Decisions 41<br />
13. Consultancy, Patents and Commercialization of Technology 43<br />
14. Approved On-Going Institute Projects 43<br />
15. Participation of Scientists in Conferences, Meetings, 44<br />
Workshops, Seminars, Symposia etc.<br />
16. Distinguished Visitors 46<br />
17. <strong>Research</strong> and Management Personnel 46<br />
18. Infrastructure Development 46<br />
19. Other Activities 47<br />
20. Meteorological Data 48
Preface<br />
Grape area and production over a period is increasing steadily which indicates the growth of<br />
this sector. This is more evident in case of wine grapes. Keeping this in view, the experimentation<br />
on wine grape is being emphasized more. Enough emphasis was given on the development of<br />
infrastructure in terms of completion of ongoing various farm structures, roads and other works. Few<br />
new equipments and tools were also acquired <strong>for</strong> various laboratories of the institute. Further,<br />
scientific manpower in Plant Protection was also strengthened during this period.<br />
The institute has progressed by leaps and bounds during one decade of its establishment.<br />
Excellent infrastructure is developed during the last five years and the laboratories are now well<br />
equipped with modern and sophisticated equipments. Several agencies specially APEDA and DBT<br />
have funded research projects of the Institute. The Institute's contribution towards progress of grape<br />
industry in the country was recognized at different <strong>for</strong>a. Excellent ef<strong>for</strong>ts of this Institute as <strong>National</strong><br />
Referral Laboratory resulted in considerable reduction in pesticide residues in export grapes during<br />
the last four years as compared to 2003-04 as the first year of the programme. This is also helping<br />
in reduction of pesticide use in domestic grape production.<br />
During the period, clonal selections identified by the farmers were collected and added to the<br />
germplasm. Work on screening of large number of germplasm was undertaken to evaluate their<br />
resistance / tolerance to economically important diseases and insect pests and few were identified<br />
<strong>for</strong> further research. Promising hybrids developed in previous years were further evaluated <strong>for</strong> their<br />
suitability <strong>for</strong> table and wine purpose. In biotechnology, work on molecular tagging continued further<br />
<strong>for</strong> conclusive studies and developed molecular techniques <strong>for</strong> variety and hybrid identification besides<br />
testing genetic variability.<br />
Studies on yield per<strong>for</strong>mance of commercial table and wine varieties were continued using<br />
different canopy models and data was collected. Per<strong>for</strong>mance of Tas-A-Ganesh grafted on 110 R<br />
rootstock was found to be better as compared to other rootstocks. Pink berry in table grape variety<br />
was identified as major problem and explorating work in development of infrastructure <strong>for</strong><br />
undertaking this work was initiated. Preliminary work like survey of this problem, effect of various<br />
cultural practices and use of various chemicals <strong>for</strong> improving quality was also undertaken during this<br />
period. <strong>Research</strong> work initiated earlier on nutrient and soil management was continued further with<br />
more emphasis on wine grapes and deficiencies of various nutrients and its management. Work on<br />
soil biology in terms of studying the mould flora of rhizosphere and non-rhizosphere was also initiated<br />
during this period.<br />
Management of commercially important insect pests and diseases is an important in grape<br />
cultivation since it decides the total cost of grape cultivation. During the period, various new<br />
chemicals were studied <strong>for</strong> their bio-efficacy, and residue data to work out their appropriate Post<br />
Harvest Interval (PHI) and Maximum Residue Limit (MRL) values, keeping in the view the export<br />
market <strong>for</strong> table grapes. Based on this study, the list of recommended chemicals in Annexure - 7 and<br />
11 under the Pesticide Residue Monitoring Plan of APEDA was revised and necessary changes were<br />
made through the program of <strong>National</strong> Referral Laboratory <strong>for</strong> this work. As a result of this good<br />
work, today export has reached to level of 55,000 MT from the level of 20,000 - 22,000 MT four<br />
years back.<br />
| i |
NRC <strong>for</strong> <strong>Grapes</strong> | Annual Report 2006-07<br />
Transfer of Technology and in<strong>for</strong>mation through training programmes, field visits, seminars and<br />
interaction with the growers is an important and integral activity of the Institute. Training<br />
programmes on integrated pest and nutrient management, and advances in tropical viticulture<br />
received enormous response from the growers. Technologies developed during the last few years<br />
were transferred to the growers through frequent field visits, organizing training programmes at the<br />
institute and participating in seminars organized by the grape growers' associations of different states.<br />
The scientists of the Institute were frequently invited by other organizations like growers' associations,<br />
societies, State Govts. agencies as resource persons <strong>for</strong> training programmes. The Institute published<br />
several technical bulletins, leaflets and popular articles in local language during the period.<br />
Gross revenue of Rs. 40.19 lakhs was generated against the target of Rs. 40.00 lakhs through<br />
training, consultancy, contract research and services and sale of planting material and farm produce<br />
and interest on term deposit receipts during the period of work.<br />
With the limited manpower, the Institute has made all ef<strong>for</strong>ts to fulfill the aspirations of the<br />
various stakeholders of grape industry in the country. For all this success, the credit goes to the<br />
scientific, technical, administrative and supporting staff of the Institute besides the backup support<br />
from the Headquarters office at New Delhi.<br />
I would like to place on record the guidance and the encouragement received from Dr. Mangala<br />
Rai, Secretary, DARE and Director General, ICAR. I also appreciate the ef<strong>for</strong>ts and help received<br />
from my scientific and technical staff members in the preparation of this important document.<br />
Place : Pune<br />
Date : December 2007<br />
(P. G. ADSULE)<br />
Director<br />
| ii |
H$m`©H$mar gmamße<br />
amÔ≠><strong>r`</strong> AßJya AZwgßYmZ H{$›– H$s ÒWm[Zm gZ 1997 _{ß h˛B©$& H{$›– H$m C‘{Ì` AßJya CÀ[mXZ, CÀ[mXH$Vm Am°a<br />
C[`m{J H$m{ ‡^modV H$aZ{ dmc{ O°odH$ Am°a AO°odH$ oZ`m_H$m| H$m{ gwbPmZ{ h{Vw _m°obH$ Am°a gm_naH$ _hÀd H$m<br />
AZwgßYmZ h°$& BZ C‘{Ì`m| H$s [yoV© H{$ obE odo^fi AZwgßYmZ H$m`©H´$_m| H{$ A›VJ©V AZwgßYmZ oH$`m Om ahm h°$&<br />
EH$ XeH$ _| H{$›– Z{ Mh˛±_wIr odH$mg oH$`m h°$& o[N>b{ [m±M dfm~ _| CÀH•$apple> ]woZ`mXr T>m±Mm odH$ogV oH$`m J`m<br />
h°$& g^r ‡`m{JembmE± ZdrZV_ Am°a [naÓH•$V C[H$aUm| g{ b°g h¢$& odo^fi EO{p›g`m| O°g{ E[rS>m Am°a S>r ]r Q>r Z{<br />
H$B© AZwgßYmZ [na`m{OZmAm| H$m{ AmoW©H$ ghm`Vm Xr h°$& X{e _| AßJya C⁄m{J H{$ odH$mg _| H|$›– H{$ gh`m{J H$m{ H$B©<br />
_ßMm| [a ghmam J`m$& amÔ≠><strong>r`</strong> gßX^© ‡`m{Jembm H{$ Í$[ _| H{$›– H{$ CÀH•$Ô> ‡`mgm| H{$ \$bÒdÍ$[ Bg df© oZ`m©oVV AßJya<br />
_| H$sQ>ZmeH$ Ade{fm| H$s _mÃm _| o[N>b{ VrZ dfm~ H{$ _wH$m]b{ _hÀd[yU© H$_r h˛B©$& Bgg{ Ka{bw CÀ[mXZ _|<br />
H$sQ>ZmeH$m| H{$ ‡`m{J _| ^r H$_r hm{ ahr h°$&<br />
15 gßÒWmZ<strong>r`</strong> H$m`m©H´$_m| H{$ Abmdm, 1 S>r ]r Q>r, 3 E[rS>m Am°a 1 Z{Q>dH©$ [na`m{OZm H{$ A›VJ©V AZwgßYmZ<br />
H$m`© h˛Am$& BgH{$ AoVna∑V H$B© AZw]ßY VWm [am_e© [na`m{OZmAm| [a ^r H$m_ h˛Am$& df© H{$ Xm°amZ H{$›– H$s<br />
CÑ{IZ<strong>r`</strong> C[bp„Y`m± oZÂZ h¢$&<br />
\$gb gwYma<br />
AßJya oH$gmZm| ¤mam [hMmZ{ JE eaX grS>b°g H{$ Xm{ ∑bm{Z H$m{ gßJ´ohV H$a C›h| amÔ≠><strong>r`</strong> AßJya OZZ–Ï` gßJ´h<br />
_| gpÂ_obV oH$`m J`m$& OZZ–Ï` H{$ ‡j{Ã [arjU _| _wª` \ß$\y$X am{Jm| H{$ ‡oV am{oYV ‡odoapple>`m| H$s [hMmZ H$s<br />
J`r$& S>mCZr o_ÎS>Áy, [mCS>ar o_ÎS>Áy Am°a EßW´{H$Zm{µO H{$ ‡oVam{Yr ‡odoapple>`m| H$s [hMmZ H$s JB©$H$sQ> oW´flg H{$ ‡oV<br />
am{Yr H$B© ‡odoapple>`m| H$s ^r [hMmZ H$s J`r$& _ycd•ßV H$m H$mo`©H$s O°dagm`Z JwUm| H{$ AmYma [a JwUrH$aU oH$`m<br />
J`m$& ]{ab|oS>`ar Am°a Í$[pÒQ≠>g H{$ gßH$a _ycd•ßV _| g]g{ AoYH$ \$sZm{b _mÃm, ‡m{brZ, ‡m{Q>rZ, ‚b{dZm∞BS≤>g Am°a<br />
Ob ‡`m{J j_Vm [m`r J`r$& Bg H|$– _| ‡OoZV _ycd•ßV$ Ama Q>r-3 Am°a Ama Q>r-4 _| 60 VWm 66.7 ‡oVeV<br />
g\$bVm ÒWm[Z _| [m`r J`r Om{ oH$ BZH{$ [°ÃH$ _ycd•ßV g{ AoYH$ Wr$& o[N>b{ dfm~ H{$ ‡OZZ H$m`©H´$_ g{ ‡mflV H$B©<br />
gßH$am| H$m VmO{ \$b Am°a _oXam C[`m{J H{$ obE _yÎ`mßH$Z oH$`m J`m$& odo^fi ÒWmZm| g{ gßJ´ohV Wm∞_gZ grS>b°g<br />
Am°a Cgg{ oZH$b{ ∑bm{Zm| H$m _m`H´$m{g{Q>{bmBQ> Am∞p dH$ _mH©$a g{ A‹``Z oH$`m J`m Am°a H$B© ‡oVH•$oV ∑bm{Z H$s<br />
[hMmZ H$s J`r Om{ ]{hVa OZZ–Ï` ‡]ßYZ _| ghm`H$ hm{Jr & _m∞ob∑`yba A‹``Z g{ ‡m· odemc AmßH$∂S>m| H{$ gßM`<br />
Am°a BÒV{_mb H{$ obE H$Âfl`yQ>a AmYmnaV S>{Q>m]{g H$m odH$mg oH$`m Om ahm h°$&<br />
AßJya H$s ‡_wI \ß$\y$X am{J, S>mCZr o_ÎS>Áy ‡oVam{oYH$Vm g{ Ow∂S>{ _mH©$a H$s [hMmZ H{$ obE AmdÌ`H$ [m°Ym<br />
gm_J´r odH$ogV H$aZ{ H{$ obE gßd{Xr bm{H$o‡` oH$Ò_| Wm∞_gZ grS>b°g Am°a ‚b{_ grS>b°g H$m g{d{B© odbmS>© Am°a<br />
gr]{b Zm_H$ ‡oVam{Yr gßH$am| H{$ gmW ‡OZZ oH$`m J`m$& Bg am{J H{$ ‡oV odo^fi ÒVa<strong>r`</strong> ‡oVam{Yr Am°a gßd{Xr<br />
Mdmbrg ‡odoapple>`m| H$m 24 ‡mB_a H{$ gmW odÌb{fU oH$`m J`m$& \$sZm{Q>mB[ Am°a OrZm{Q>mB[ AmßH$∂S>m| H{$ gmßpª`H$s<br />
odÌb{fU _| Bg JwU g{ Ow∂S>{ VrZ gß^modV _mH©$a ]°›S> H$s [hMmZ H$s J`r$& BZ _mH©$a ]°›S> H$m{ Eobb Ò[{ngo\$H$<br />
_mH©$a ]ZmZ{ H{$ obE ‡`mg oH$E JE$&<br />
\$gb CÀ[mXZ<br />
EH$ VZm H{$ _wH$m]b{ o¤ VZm Q≠>{qZJ [’oV _| ‡À`mam{n[V Vme-E-JU{e _| AoYH$ Jw¿N>m ZÂ]a/]{b, Jw¿N>m<br />
| iii |
NRC <strong>for</strong> <strong>Grapes</strong> | Annual Report 2006-07<br />
dOZ, 50 _oU dOZ, _oU Ï`mg Am°a [°Xmdma/]{b [m`r J`r$& Bgr ‡H$ma Vme-E-JU{e _| ojoVO g_mZmßVa<br />
pÒWoV H{$ _wH$m]b{ C‹d© pÒWoV _| VZm AoYH$ \$bXma W{$& A›` _ycd•ßV H{$ _wH$m]b{ 110 Ama [a H$bo_V Vme-E-<br />
JU{e H$m oZd[mXZ ]{hVa Wm$&<br />
A›` _ycd•ßV H{$ _wH$m]b{ 110 Ama [a ‡À`mam{o[V Wm∞_gZ grS>b°g _| erK´ H$br Ò\w$Q>Z [m`m J`m$& EH$ [Œmr<br />
AdÒWm [a S>m∞JarO [a gdm©oYH$ Ob ‡`m{J j_Vm [m`r JB©$& 110 Ama _ybd•ßV [a ‡À`mam{o[V Wm∞_gZ grS>b°g _|<br />
gdm©oYH$ Jw¿N> gߪ`m Am°a ‡oV ]{b [°Xmda [m`r J`r b{oH$Z Jw¿N>m dOZ, _oU Ï`mg Am°a _oU bÂ]mB© S>m∞JarO [a<br />
‡À`mam{o[V Wm∞_gZ grS>b°g _| o_br$& 1613 gr [a ‡À`mam{o[V Wm∞_gZ grS>b°g _| A›` _ycd•ßV H{$ _wH$m]b{ H$_<br />
"q[H$ ]°ar' [m`r J`r Om{ oH$ og\©$ 25-30% Wr O] oH$ A›` _ycd•ßV _| 70-80% Jw¿N>m| [a "q[H$ ]{ar' H$m ‡^md<br />
[m`m J`m$& Veraison g{ [hb{ H°$pÎg`_ ∑bm{amB©S> H{$ oN>∂S>H$md g{ aßJ odH$mg _{ß H$_r [m`r J`r$&<br />
N>Q>mB© H{$ Z„]{ oXZ ]mX 110 Ama Am°a S>m∞JarO [a ‡À`mam{o[V Wm∞_gZ grS>b°g _| AoYH$ [m{Q>°oe`_ H$s _mÃm<br />
Wr Om{ BZ _ycd•ßV H$s ]{hVa [m{fU ‡`m{J j_Vm Xem©Vm h°$& S>m∞JarO Am°a gmÎQ> H´$sH$ H{$ _wH$m]b{ 110 Ama [a<br />
‡À`mam{o[V Wm∞_gZ grS>b°g _| gm{oS>`_ H$s _mÃm _| _hÀd[yU© H$_r [m`r J`r gmW hr gdm©oYH$ C[O ^r [m`m J`r$&<br />
`h [naUm_ Bg _ycd•ßV H$s jma<strong>r`</strong> o_Q≤>Q>r _| AZwHy$bVm H$m{ Xem©V{ h¢$& ‡À`mam{o[V ]{bm| H{$ _wH$m]b{ Òd:OS> ]{bm| H$s<br />
[U©d•ßŒmm{ _| oO›H$ H$s _mÃm _| _hÀd[yU© AoYH$Vm Wr$& AWm©V Òd:OS> ]{bm| _| oO›H$ ‡`m{J H$s Xa _| ]Xbmd H$s<br />
AmdÌ`H$Vm h°$&<br />
AßJya H{$ O∂S> j{Ã Am°a J°a O∂S> j{Ã$o_Q≤>Q>r g{ [•W∑H$sH•$V JE EÒ[aOrbg H{$ ]mah AmBgm{b{Q> Z{ ‡`m{Jembm H{$<br />
‡`m{Jm| _| _hÀd[yU© ÒVa [a \$m∞Ò\{$Q> Kwbmd oH$`m$&<br />
odo^fi _oUd•o’ AdÒWmAm| [a oO]a°obH$ AÂb (OrE3) VWm gr [r [r `y H{$ ‡`m{Jg{ _oU JwUdŒmm _|<br />
_hÀd[yU© AßVa [m`m J`m$& [naUm_m| H{$ gÀ`m[Z H{$ obE ‡`m{J Omar h¢$&<br />
\$gb gßajU<br />
_{›S>r‡m{[mo_S> 0.8-1.0 o_br/br H$m EH$, _{›S>r‡m{[mo_S> A _|H$m{O{] 2 J´m/br H$m EH$ Am°a _{Q>mb{p∑Ob A<br />
_|H$m{O{] 2.5 J´m/br H{$ Xm{ oN>∂S>H$md g{ S>mCZr o_ÎS>Áy H$m CÀH•$Ô> oZ`ßÃU o_bm$& _mà _{Q>mb{p∑Ob `m oQ>_m{a{∑g<br />
Jm{ÎS> H{$ ‡`m{J H{$ _wH$m]b{ oQ>_m{a{∑g Jm{ÎS> H{$ ]mX _{Q>mb{p∑Ob H{$ oN>∂S>H$md g{ S>mCZr o_ÎS>Áy H$m ]{hVa oZ`ßÃU<br />
h˛Am$& EßW´{H$Zm{O H{$ oZ`ßÃU H{$ obE 0.615 J´m_/br H$s Xa g{ Wm`m{\$sZ{Q> o_WmBb H{$ oN>∂S>H$md CoMV [mE JE$&<br />
oQ>_m{a{∑g H{$ ]mX h{∑OmH$m{ZmOm{b H{$ oN>∂S>H$md g{ [mCS>ar o_ÎS>Áy H$s A¿N>r am{H$Wm_ h˛B©$& \$b ÒWm[Z H{$ ]mX<br />
_°flQ>mBboS>Zm{H{$[ H{$ Mma oN>∂S>H$md g{ [Œmr Am°a Jw¿N>m| [a [mCS>ar o_ÎS>Áy H$s A¿N>r am{H$Wm_ h˛B©$&<br />
Zmam`UJmßd Am°a qXXm{ar (ZmogH$) _| EH$ g{ [m±M dfv` AßJya ]mJmZm| _| AßJya br\$ am°b g{ Ow∂S>{ dmBag H{$<br />
bjU X{I{ J`{$& Eobgm (ELISA) [arjU _| dmBag H$s [woÔ> H$s J`r$& AßJya ]mJmZm| g{ EH$ ‡oVam{Yr `rÒQ> Am°a EH$<br />
Ep∑Q>Zm{_mBgrQ> H$m [•W∑H$sH$aU oH$`m J`m$&<br />
AßJya ]mJ _| H$sQ> [aOrod`m| H$m _m°g_r AmH´$_U H$m _m°g_ _m[X S>m{ H{$ gmW ghgÂ]›Y H$m A‹``Z oH$`m$&<br />
oW´flg Am°a O°ogS> H$s gdm©oYH$ gߪ`m Zdß]a-oXgß]a AWm©V [wÓ[Z AdÒWm g{ AmapÂ^H$ _oU ÒWm[Zm AdÒWm _|<br />
[m`r J`r$& _rbr]J H$s gdm©oYH$ gߪ`m \$b VwS>mB© AdÒWm [a VWm ‚br ]rQ>Îg H$s gߪ`m Zdß]a H{$ [hb{ g·mh _|<br />
gdm©oYH$ Wr$& OZdar - \$adar H{$ Xm°amZ _mBQ≤>g H$s AoYH$ gߪ`m [m`r J`r$&<br />
| iv |
_hmamÔ≠> Am°a Am›Y´ ‡X{e H{$ AßJya CÀ[mXZ j{Ãm| _| _rbr]J H$s Xm{ _wª` OmoV`m± _∞H$m{Z∞obH$m{H$g ohagyQ>g<br />
Am°a Ò`yS>m{H$m{H$g ogQ≠>r [m`r J`r$& gmW hr _rbr]ΩO g{ OwS>r MtQ>r H$s AmR> ‡OmoV`m| H$s [hMmZ H$s J`r$& Bgr<br />
‡H$ma oW´flg H$s Xm{ _wª` OmoV`m± _hÀd[yU© [m`r J`r$& AßJya H$m{ _wª` ZwH$gmZ [h߲MmZ{ dmbr _mBQ> H$s bmb _H$∂S>r<br />
Q>{Q≠>moZH$g AmoQ>©gr H{$ Í$[ _| [hMmZ H$s J`r$&<br />
H$B© ZB© [rT>r H{$ H$sQ>Zmer O°g pÒ[Zm{g°S>, ]w‡m\{$oOZ, _{Wm{o_b, Bo_S>m∑bm{o‡S>, Wm`o_Wm{∑O_,<br />
∑bm{Wm`oZoS>Z, o\$‡m{oZb, ∑bm{a[m`na\$m{g Am°a S>mB∑bm{adm{g, O°doZ`ßÃH$maH$ oH´$flQ>m{ob_g _m∞›Q≠>moOar H{$ obE<br />
gwaojV [mE JE $& AV: BZ agm`Zm| H$m{ EH$sH•$V H$sQ> ‡]ßYZ _| ‡`m{J oH$`m Om gH$Vm h°$&<br />
AßJya _| „`y[am{\{$oµOZ Am°a pÒ[Zm{g{S> AdoeÔ> H$s —∂T>Vm H$m A‹``Z oH$`m J`m Am°a BZ agm`Zm| H{$ obE H$Q>mB©<br />
[yd© AdoY H´$_e: 40 Am°a 8 oXZ oZYm©naV H$s J`r$& \$m{a∑bm{a\{$›`yam∞Z Am°a Wm`o_Wm{∑µO_ H$s C[pÒWoV _| _•Xm<br />
E›OmB_ H{$ A‹``Z g{ [Vm Mbm oH$ ogµ\$mnae _mÃm [a BZ agm`Zm| H$m _•Xm _| O°odH$ oH´$`mAm| [a H$m{B© ‡oVHy$b<br />
‡^md Zht hm{Vm$& BZ agm`Zm| H$m Adem{fU A‹``Z _| \$m{a∑bm{a\{$›`yam{Z H$_ g{ _‹`_ brqMJ gm_œ`© Am°a<br />
Wm`o_Wm{∑O_ _‹`_ g{ CÉ brqMJ gm_œ`©dmbm agm`Z [m`m J`m$&<br />
H$Q>mB© g{ Vrg oXZ [hb{ H$s AdoY _| Q≠>mBH$m{S>_m© H{$ oN>∂S>H$md g{ ‚bwogbmOm{b H{$ obE H$Q>mB© [yd© AdoY 48<br />
oXZ g{ H$_ hm{H$a 18 oXZ ah J`r$&<br />
‡m°⁄m{oJH$s Am°a gyMZm ÒWmZmßVaU<br />
‡oejU H$m`©H´$_, ‡j{Ã Xe©Z, g{o_Zma Am°a AßJya CÀ[mXH$m| H{$ gmW [maÒ[mnaH$ ]mVMrV ¤mam ‡m°⁄m{oJH$s<br />
Am°a gyMZm ÒWmZmßVaU Bg H{$›– H$m EH$ _hÀd[yU© Am°a Aod^m¡` H$m`© H$bm[ h°$& EH$sH•$V am{J Edß [m{fU ‡]ßY<br />
VWm CÓU H$oQ>]ßYr j{Ãm| _{ß AßJya CÀ[mXZ _| CfiV odf`m| [a Am`m{oOV ‡oejU H$m`©H´$_mß H$m{ ]h˛V gamhZm o_br$&<br />
odo^fi am¡`m| H{$ AßJya CÀ[mXH$ gßKQ>Zm| ¤mam A`m{oOV g{o_Zma Am°a ‡j{Ã Xe©Z ¤mam H{$›– _| odH$ogV VH$ZrH$m| H$m{<br />
CÀ[mXH$m| VH$ [h±˛Om`m J`m$& Bg H|$– H{$ d°kmoZH$m| H$m{ odo^fi gßÒWmAm| H{$ ‡oejU H$m`©H´$_m| _| Ûm{V Ï`o∫$ H{$ Í$[<br />
_| ]wbm`m J`m$& H|$– g{ AZ{H$ VH$ZrH$s ]wb{oQ>Z Am°a bm{H$o‡` b{I ‡H$moeV h˛E h¢$&<br />
_mZd gßgmYZ odH$mg<br />
Xm{ d°kmoZH$ Am°a Xm{ odŒm Edß b{Im AoYH$mna`m| H$m{ CZH{$ j{Ã _| ZB© OmZH$ar hmogb H$aZ{ H{$ obE odo^fi<br />
gßÒWmZm| _| ^{Om J`m$& H$B© d°kmoZH$m| Z{ amÔ≠><strong>r`</strong> A›Vam©Ô≠><strong>r`</strong> gÂ_{bZm| Am°a H$m`©embmAm| _{ ^mJ b{H$a A[Zm kmZ<br />
]T>m`m$&<br />
amOÒd Am`<br />
oZYm©naV b˙` 40 bmI Í$[`{ H{$ _wH$m]b{ H{$›– Z{ 40.19 bmI Í$[`{ H$s amOÒd Am` AoO©V H$s & `h amOÒd<br />
Am` ‡oejU, gbmh, AZw]p›YV AZwgßYmZ Am°a g{dmE±, \$m_© CÀ[mX Am°a [m°Y gm_J´r ]{M H$a h˛B©$&<br />
^mdr ‡oV]b j{Ã<br />
AmZ{ dmb{ dfm~ _| _oXam AßJya CÀ[mXZ H{$ obE ‡m°⁄m{oJH$s H$m odH$mg, [aOrdr ZmeH$ AdoeÔ> _mÃm _| H$_r,<br />
[`m©daU, AZwHy$b ‡m°⁄m{oJH$s H$m odH$mg Am°a O°d ‡m°⁄m{oJH$s, AZwgßYmZ H{$ H|$– o]›Xw hm|J{$&<br />
<br />
H$m`©H$mar gmamße<br />
| v |
Executive Summary<br />
<strong>National</strong> <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Centre</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Grapes</strong> was established in 1997 with the mandate to undertake<br />
mission-oriented programme involving basic and strategic research <strong>for</strong> resolving the major biotic and<br />
abiotic constraints affecting the grapes production, productivity and utilization. To achieve this,<br />
research is carried out in the broad areas of crop improvement, crop production, crop protection and<br />
post harvest technology.<br />
During one decade of its establishment, the <strong>Centre</strong> has progressed by leaps and bounds.<br />
Excellent infrastructure is developed during last five years and the laboratories are now equipped with<br />
modern and sophisticated equipments. Several agencies specially APEDA and DBT have funded<br />
research projects. The <strong>Centre</strong>'s contribution towards progress of grape industry in the country was<br />
recognised at different <strong>for</strong>a. Excellent ef<strong>for</strong>ts of this <strong>Centre</strong> as <strong>National</strong> Referral Laboratory resulted<br />
in considerable reduction in pesticide residues in export grapes during last four years as compared to<br />
2003-04 as the first year of the programme. This is also helping in reduction of pesticide use in<br />
domestic production.<br />
Besides 15 institute programmes, which were <strong>for</strong>mulated after thorough understanding of the<br />
growers' need and refined time to time after recommendations of the RAC and SRC, research was<br />
carried out under 1 DBT, 3 APEDA and 1 ICAR Network project and also undertook several contract<br />
research and consultancy projects. The salient achievements of the Institute during 2006-07 are<br />
given below:<br />
Crop Improvement<br />
Two clonal selections identified by the farmers were collected and added to national grape<br />
germplasm repository. Field screening of germplasm identified few accessions with single or multiple<br />
disease resistance. Few accessions were resistant to all the three major diseases. Accessions showing<br />
resistance to thrips were also identified. Rootstocks were characterised <strong>for</strong> their physico-chemical<br />
properties. Highest phenol content, proline, proteins, flavonoid and water use efficiency was<br />
observed in rootstocks belonging to Berlandieri × Rupestris crosses. The rootstocks bred at the<br />
Institute viz. RT4 and RT3 established better than their parents with 66.7 per cent and 60.0 percent<br />
of success in establishment, respectively. Several promising hybrids obtained from previous years<br />
crosses were evaluated <strong>for</strong> their suitability <strong>for</strong> table and wine purpose. 24 Thompson Seedless clones<br />
were analysed with RAPD and microsatellite primers and several duplicates were identified. A<br />
computer based molecular database has been developed.<br />
Commercially popular varieties viz. Thompson Seedless and Flame Seedless were crossed with<br />
Sevye Villard and Seibel (downy mildew resistant varieties) to obtain segregating population <strong>for</strong><br />
tagging downy mildew resistance in grapes. 44 accessions showing varying level of resistance and<br />
susceptibility to downy mildew were analysed with 24 more microsatellite primers. Multiple<br />
regression analysis of phenotypic and genotype data identified three promising bands showing<br />
association with this trait. These marker bands were cloned and sequenced. The primer was<br />
redesigned to develop allele specific marker.<br />
Crop production<br />
The yield per<strong>for</strong>mance of grafted Tas-A-Ganesh in terms of average number of bunches/vine,<br />
bunch weight, berry weight, berry diameter and yield per vine was better on double stem as<br />
compared to the single stem training system. Similarly vertically positioned shoots in Tas-A-Ganesh<br />
were found to be more fruitful as compared to horizontally placed.<br />
| vi |
Executive Summary<br />
Tas-A-Ganesh grafted on 110 R per<strong>for</strong>med better than those grafted on other rootstocks in<br />
term of early bud sprouting, berry length and its weight. Similarly, Thomson Seedless grafted on<br />
110R sprouted early compare to those on other rootstocks.<br />
Water use efficiency at single leaf level was maximum on Dogridge followed by those on 110R,<br />
1103P and 99R. Significant difference was observed <strong>for</strong> the yield and quality parameters where<br />
110R rootstock recorded highest number of bunches and yield per vine. However, average bunch<br />
weight, berry diameter and berry length was higher on Dogridge as compared to 110R and other<br />
rootstocks.<br />
Least pink berry incidence (25-30 %) was observed in Thompson Seedless grafted on 1613 C<br />
rootstocks followed by own rooted vines. While on the other rootstocks like Dogridge, 110 R, 1103<br />
P, St. George, SO-4, 99 R, the incidence ranged from 70-80 %. Application of calcium chloride<br />
reduced the pink colour development significantly.<br />
Thompson Seedless grafted on 110R and Dogridge contained higher K content at 90 days after<br />
pruning indicating their better nutrient use efficiency. Significantly less Na content was found in<br />
Thompson Seedless vines raised on 110R rootstock as compared to Dogridge and Salt Creek<br />
suggesting its suitability <strong>for</strong> use in case of saline soils. The highest yield was also obtained on this<br />
rootstock.<br />
The concentration of the zinc was significantly more in petioles of own rooted compared to<br />
grafted vines indicating that the own rooted vines may require different rates of zinc applications.<br />
Twelve Aspergillus isolates from the rhizosphere and non- rhizosphere soils of the grapevines<br />
showed significant P solubilization in vitro studies.<br />
The significant differences were recorded in berry quality with the differential application of<br />
GA 3 and CPPU at various stages of berry growth. For con<strong>for</strong>mity of results experiment is in<br />
progress.<br />
Crop protection<br />
Four Sprays of Mandipropamid 250 SC, 0.8 - 1.0 ml/L; (Mandipropamid + mancozeb) 65<br />
WG, 2.0 g/L; (Metalaxyl M + mancozeb) 68 WP (Ridomil Gold), 2.5 g/L; (Metalaxyl M + mancozeb)<br />
68 WG, 2.5 g/L showed an excellent control of downy mildew after April pruning and retained<br />
leaves till October. Timorex Gold (24% Australian tea tree oil) sprays followed by Metalaxyl Sprays<br />
showed better control of downy mildew as compared to sprays of metalaxyl alone and Timorex Gold<br />
alone. Four Sprays of Thiophanate methyl with 70 WP, 0.615 g/L showed good control of<br />
anthracnose and moderate control of powdery mildew till October. Timorex Sprays followed by<br />
hexaconazole sprays showed better control of powdery mildew than spays of hexaconazole or<br />
Timorex Gold alone. Four Sprays of meptyldinocap 35 EC, 0.309 - 0.343 ml/L after fruit set were<br />
found to be good <strong>for</strong> controlling powdery mildew on leaves as well as bunches. One antagonist yeast<br />
and an actinomyetes were isolated from the vineyard.<br />
Seasonal incidence of insect pests in grape vineyards and their correlation with weather<br />
parameters was studied. Thrips and jassids were observed during November-December, which<br />
coincided with flowering period to early berry setting period. Mealybug incidence was recorded<br />
highest during harvesting (March-April). Flea beetle population was highest in first week of<br />
November. High incidence of Red Spider mites (Tetranychus urticae) was noticed during late winter<br />
and early summer months of January-February in Nasik.<br />
| vii |
NRC <strong>for</strong> <strong>Grapes</strong> | Annual Report 2006-07<br />
M. hirsutus and P. citri were found to be the major species of mealy bug in grape growing<br />
regions of Maharashtra and Andhra Pradesh. Eight species of ants were found associated with the<br />
mealybugs in the vineyards. Similarly two major species of thrips were found to be of economic<br />
importance. The mite causing the damage to grapes was identified as red spider mite Tetranychus<br />
urticae.<br />
Several new generation insecticides like spinosad, buprofezin, methomyl, imidacloprid,<br />
thiamethoxam, clothianidin, fipronil, chlorpyriphos and dichlorvos were found to be effective in<br />
managing various insects and pests and safe <strong>for</strong> Cryptolaemus montrouzieri and there<strong>for</strong>e, could<br />
be integrated in the IPM package.<br />
Persistence of buprofezin and spinosad residues in grapes was studied and their PHI was<br />
estimated to be 40 days and 8 days, respectively. Study on enzyme activity of soil born microflora in<br />
presence of <strong>for</strong>chlorfenuron and thiamethoxam indicated that these chemicals pose no threat to soil<br />
biological activity at recommended dose. Sorption studies of these chemicals in soils categorised<br />
Forchlorfenuron as a chemical with low to medium leaching potential and Thiamethoxam as medium<br />
to high leaching potential.<br />
Sprays of Trichoderma during the last 30 days be<strong>for</strong>e harvest reduced the PHI of flusilazole<br />
from 48 days to 18 days.<br />
Transfer of Technology<br />
Transfer of technology and in<strong>for</strong>mation through training programmes, field visits, seminars, and<br />
interaction with the grower is an important and integral activity of the Institute. Training programmes<br />
on integrated pest and nutrient management, and advances in tropical viticulture received enormous<br />
response from the growers. Technologies developed during the last few years were transferred to the<br />
growers through frequent field visits, organizing training programmes at the Institute and<br />
participating in the seminars organized by the grape growers associations of different States. The<br />
scientists of the Institute were frequently invited as resource persons <strong>for</strong> training programmes<br />
organized by other organizations like growers' associations / societies, State Govts., etc. The <strong>Centre</strong><br />
published several technical bulletins, leaflets and popular articles in local language during the period.<br />
Human resource development<br />
Two scientists and two Finance and Accounts officials were trained in their respective areas of<br />
work by deputing them to professional institutes in the country. Several scientists participated in<br />
international and national symposia and workshops to update their knowledge in their respective<br />
fields.<br />
Revenue generation<br />
Gross revenue of Rs. 40.19 lakhs was generated against the target of Rs. 40.00 lakhs through<br />
training, consultancy, contract research and services and sale of planting material and farm produce<br />
and interest on term deposit receipts during the period of work.<br />
Future thrust<br />
Development of technologies <strong>for</strong> wine grapes, minimization of pesticide residues, development<br />
environment friendly technologies, sustaining the present yield and improving the quality of produce<br />
will be the focus of research in coming years.<br />
<br />
| viii |
Introduction<br />
The <strong>National</strong> <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Centre</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Grapes</strong> started functioning in Pune at Manjri, from 18 th January<br />
1997 has completed a decade of its establishment. Spread over an area of 46.78 ha of land the<br />
<strong>Centre</strong> functions from its Laboratory-cum-Administrative building. A total area of about 32 acre has<br />
been planted with Dogridge rootstock, of which 6 acre has been grafted with Thompson seedless and<br />
Tas-A-Ganesh cultivars <strong>for</strong> various experimental trials and 415 indigenous and exotic spp./varieties/<br />
hybrids etc. to establish the germplasm repository. Extended 'Y' trellises <strong>for</strong> training the vines to flat<br />
roof gable and drip irrigation/fertigation facilities have been established. Two acres of vineyard is<br />
grafted with newly introduced commercially important table varieties to develop mother block <strong>for</strong><br />
supplying high quality planting material to the growers. Irrigation facilities have been augmented time<br />
to time to meet the water requirement <strong>for</strong> additional vineyards. A polyhouse, glasshouse and FRP<br />
houses have been constructed to maintain seedlings and conducting experiments under controlled<br />
conditions. The development of another 20 acres of vineyards mainly <strong>for</strong> wine grapes is under<br />
progress.<br />
Mandate<br />
To undertake the programmes covering basic and strategic research <strong>for</strong> resolving the major<br />
biotic and abiotic constraints affecting the grapes quality production, productivity, to sustain the<br />
productivity, promote diversification towards wine and other value added products and<br />
evaluation of technologies <strong>for</strong> developing region specific technologies.<br />
Thrust areas of research<br />
• Eco-region specific technology generation and extension in continuation<br />
• Enhancement of water productivity and nutrient use efficiency.<br />
• Climate change and management of stresses.<br />
• Value-added product development, food safety and quality assurance.<br />
• Bio-remediation, Bio-fertilization, Bio-molecules, Bio-<strong>for</strong>tification, Bio-safety, Bio-security, and<br />
Biosensors.<br />
• IT-based decision support systems <strong>for</strong> technology transfer<br />
| 1 |
NRC <strong>for</strong> <strong>Grapes</strong> | Annual Report 2006-07<br />
Quinquennial Review Team<br />
<strong>Research</strong> Advisory Committee<br />
Institute <strong>Research</strong> Committee<br />
Director<br />
Institute Management Committee<br />
Joint Staff Council<br />
Administration<br />
and Finance &<br />
Accounts<br />
Farm<br />
Management,<br />
Estate<br />
<strong>Research</strong> and<br />
Transfer of<br />
Technology<br />
PME /<br />
Technical<br />
Cell<br />
Technical Services:<br />
ARIS, OLIC, IPR, IRGS,<br />
Publications, etc.<br />
Library<br />
Grape<br />
Improvement<br />
Grape<br />
Production<br />
Grape<br />
Protection<br />
Postharvest<br />
Technology <strong>for</strong> <strong>Grapes</strong><br />
Financial statement<br />
Sl.<br />
No.<br />
Heads<br />
(Rs. in Lakhs)<br />
R. E. 2006-07 Expenditure 2006-07 Final Grant Revenue<br />
Plan Non-Plan Plan Non-Plan Plan Non-Plan Generated<br />
1. Estt. Charges 0.00 83.70 0.00 83.70 0.00 83.70<br />
2. O.T.A. 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.10<br />
3. T.A. 3.00 1.50 3.00 1.50 3.00 1.50<br />
4. Other charges 121.40 54.40 121.40 54.40 121.40 54.40<br />
5. Works 125.91 8.00 125.91 8.00 125.91 8.00<br />
Total 250.31 147.70 250.31 147.70 250.31 147.70 40.19 *<br />
* Revenue of Rs. 40.19 lakhs was generated against the target of Rs. 40.00 lakhs through training, consultancy,<br />
contract research and services and sale of planting material and farm produce and interest on term deposit receipts.<br />
Staff position<br />
Sl.<br />
No.<br />
Post<br />
Number of posts<br />
Sanctioned Filled Vacant<br />
1. <strong>Research</strong> & Management Personnel 1 1 0<br />
2. Scientific 16 13 3<br />
3. Technical 8 8 0<br />
4. Administrative 9 9 0<br />
5. Supportive 7 7 0<br />
Total 41 38 3<br />
| 2 |
<strong>Research</strong> Achievements<br />
Programme 1.<br />
Management of genetic resources of grapes<br />
1.1 Collection and augmentation<br />
Two clonal selections one each from Sharad Seedless and Sonaka, reported by the farmers have<br />
been collected. The salient features of these selections as reported by farmers and our own<br />
observations from growers' vineyards are presented in table 1.<br />
Table 1. Salient features of new clonal selections<br />
Selection<br />
Yield<br />
(tons<br />
ha -1 )<br />
Bunch<br />
shape<br />
Bunch<br />
weight<br />
(g)<br />
Berry<br />
colour<br />
Berry<br />
shape<br />
Berry<br />
weight<br />
(g)<br />
TSS<br />
(°brix)<br />
Acidity<br />
(%)<br />
Remarks<br />
Mutant of 28.0 Shouldered, 850- Purple Elliptical 10-14 g 22.0 0.55 Responds<br />
Sharad Conical 1200 Black well to GA<br />
Seedless<br />
and CPPU<br />
(Accession<br />
No. B2-43-6)<br />
Mutant of 22.0 Cylindrical 350- Cream Elongated 4-7 g 23.0 0.60 Responds<br />
Sonaka 550 white and well to GA<br />
(Accession<br />
arched<br />
No. A2-8-5)<br />
A2-8-5<br />
(Mutant of Sonaka)<br />
1.2 Characterization, documentation and cataloguing<br />
1.2.1 Physio biochemical analysis of rootstocks<br />
Ten rootstocks namely Dogridge, B2-56, DeGrasset, 110R, 99 R, 1103 P, Teleki 5A, St. George,<br />
V. champinii and Salt Creek were characterized based on various physiological and biochemical<br />
parameters. Total phenolic content was low in DeGrasset, St. George, Salt Creek and Vitis<br />
champinii, high in 99 R, 1103 P, Dogridge and 110R and moderate in Teleki 5A and B2-56.<br />
Proline, proteins and flavonoids were recorded high in V. berlandieri × V. rupestris crosses followed<br />
| 3 |
NRC <strong>for</strong> <strong>Grapes</strong> | Annual Report 2006-07<br />
by V. champinii group and least was in V. rupestris spp and V. riparia. Reducing sugar content was<br />
maximum in Teleki 5A and minimum in 110 R rootstock.<br />
Water use efficiency was maximum in V.berlandieri and V.rupestris crosses followed by other<br />
species like V.champinii, V. riparia and V. rupestris. Rooting percent was high in 110 R, 99 R,<br />
1103 P, St. George, moderate in Dogridge, Salt Creek, B2-56 and least in Teleki 5A. Optimum C/N<br />
ratio in mother vines correlated with maximum success rate in rooting. Significant and positive<br />
correlation was observed between rooting success and total proteins and water use efficiency (WUE),<br />
while negative correlation was observed between rooting success and total phenolic content. Similarly<br />
total proline content and water use efficiency had positive correlation (Table 2).<br />
Table 2. Correlation matrix of rooting success with some biochemical and physiological parameters in<br />
rootstocks.<br />
Sucess % Phenols R. Sugars Proline Protien WUE C/N ratio<br />
Success % 1.00 -0.68* -0.16 0.23 0.72* 0.71* -0.47<br />
Phenols 1.00 0.16 0.13 0.84** 0.78** -0.37<br />
R. Sugars 1.00 -0.49 -0.23 -0.27 -0.54<br />
Proline 1.00 0.47 0.54* 0.69*<br />
Protein 1.00 0.88** -0.13<br />
WUE 1.00 -0.17<br />
C/N ratio 1.00<br />
* Significant at 5%, ** Significant at 1%<br />
1.2.2 Screening of rootstocks <strong>for</strong> propagation through hardwood cuttings<br />
Twenty rootstock varieties (Table 3) maintained and few developed at the <strong>Centre</strong> were tested <strong>for</strong> their<br />
rootability and establishment in soil under polyhouse conditions and data is presented in table 3.<br />
Maximum number of plants were established in 1616C (82.5%), followed by St. George (80%),<br />
Ramsey, 99R, 1613C (75% each) and Dogridge (72.7%). The rootstocks bred at the <strong>Centre</strong> RT4<br />
and RT3 were established better than their parents (Teleki 5A x SO4) with 66.7 per cent and 60.0<br />
percent of success, respectively.<br />
| 4 |
<strong>Research</strong> Achievements<br />
Table 3. Comparison of different rootstocks <strong>for</strong> establishment<br />
Sl. No. Name of Rootstock Cutting planted Percentage sucess<br />
1. 99 Richter 100 75.0<br />
2. 1616 Couderc 80 82.5<br />
3. V. champini 50 60.0<br />
4. Dogridge 55 72.7<br />
5. Ramsey (Salt Creek) 100 75.0<br />
6. 110 Richter 70 50.0<br />
7. Teleki-5A 70 42.8<br />
8. Freedom 150 66.7<br />
9. RT-3(Teleki 5A x SO4) (B2-66/67) 50 60.0<br />
10. 41B 50 70.0<br />
11. deGrasset 80 50.0<br />
12. 140 Ruggeri 68 70.6<br />
13. 161- 49 Couderc 50 44.0<br />
14. SO-4 70 51.4<br />
15. B2-56 100 40.0<br />
16. 1103 Paulsen 100 32.0<br />
17. V. longii 80 62.5<br />
18. 1613 Couderc 160 75.0<br />
19. St. George 125 80.0<br />
20. RT-4 (Teleki 5A x SO-4) 75 66.7<br />
1.3 Screening of grape germplasm <strong>for</strong> biotic and abiotic stress<br />
1.3.1 Screening <strong>for</strong> resistance to major diseases<br />
Field screening of grape varieties against major grape diseases<br />
All the accessions in the core germplasm collection of the <strong>Centre</strong> were screened in vivo <strong>for</strong> resistance<br />
to the three important diseases viz. downy mildew, powdery mildew and anthracnose during natural<br />
epiphytotic conditions. The ratings were recorded on 1-9 scale as proposed by UPOV. Some<br />
accessions were found immune to downy mildew, anthracnose and powdery midlew were identified.<br />
Accessions with multiple resistant to powdery and anthracnose, downy and anthracnose, rust and<br />
anthracnose, downy mildew, powdery mildew and anthracnose were idetified. Further confimations<br />
will be done.<br />
In vitro screening of grape varieties and hybrids against downy mildew<br />
Sixteen Flame Seedless (FS) x Seyve Villard (SV) hybrids and 13 Thompson Seedless (TS) x SV<br />
hybrids were screened in vitro by leaf disc technique. Four FS x SV hybrids four rated resistant and<br />
one moderately resistant, while eight TS x SV hybrids were resistant and three moderately resistant.<br />
| 5 |
NRC <strong>for</strong> <strong>Grapes</strong> | Annual Report 2006-07<br />
1.5 Screening <strong>for</strong> wine and juice quality and yield<br />
Nine wine varieties (3 years age) were characterized <strong>for</strong> their juice characteristics to assess their<br />
suitability <strong>for</strong> wine making under tropical conditions. Among the 4 white varieties EC 27818 gave<br />
maximum yield (7.4 kg/vine), followed by Symphony and Sauvignon Blanc. Mean bunch weight was<br />
maximum in Symphony however, maximum juice yield was recorded in EC27818. Among the<br />
coloured varieties Shiraz gave maximum yield with good must quality comprises TSS (20 B), acidity<br />
(0.75%) and pH (3.10). Athens and Cabernet Sauvignon were good yielders with high TSS along<br />
with moderate acidity but slightly high pH (table 4).<br />
Table 4. Yield and Must characteristics of wine varieties at NRC <strong>for</strong> <strong>Grapes</strong><br />
Sl.<br />
No.<br />
Variety<br />
Yield<br />
per vine<br />
(kg)<br />
Mean<br />
bunch<br />
wt. (g)<br />
Juice<br />
(%)<br />
TSS<br />
(°brix)<br />
Acidity<br />
(%)<br />
pH<br />
Remarks<br />
1. EC 27818 (Yugoslavia) (w) 7.4 105 86 20.2 0.48 3.45 White<br />
2. Symphony (w) 5.5 210 52 19.0 0.67 3.40 White<br />
3. Chardonnay (w) 3.3 103 59 22.0 0.70 3.50 White<br />
4. Sauvignon Blanc (w) 4.9 165 54 22.0 0.84 3.10 White<br />
5. Cabernet Sauvignon 7.5 105 84 21.0 0.60 3.50 Red<br />
6. Merlot 5.5 195 68 20.8 0.70 3.60 Red<br />
7. Shiraz 8.7 205 84 20.0 0.75 3.30 Red<br />
8. Athens 8.0 165 74 20.0 0.71 3.50 Red<br />
9. Zinfandel 5.6 125 70 21.2 0.90 3.30 Rose<br />
CD at 5% 2.1 22 4.8 1.8 0.18 0.20<br />
Programme 2.<br />
Germplasm utilization and genetic enhancement<br />
2.2 Breeding <strong>for</strong> high production and quality<br />
2.2.1 Breeding <strong>for</strong> high production and quality in table grapes<br />
Hybrids obtained from crossings of previous year were field evaluated. The main features of some of<br />
the promising hybrids are as follows:<br />
1. Pusa Navrang x Flame Seedless-1 : Teinturier, late<br />
ripening medium berry size, crisp pulp, low seed content<br />
and muscat flavour. It has potential <strong>for</strong> 2 crops per year.<br />
2. Pusa Navrang x Flame Seedless-2 : Teinturier, bold<br />
berries, early ripening, muscat flavour.<br />
3. Pusa Navrang x Flame Seedless-3 : Bold berries,<br />
non-teinturier type brilliant red colour fruits, attractive<br />
bunch and berries. Crisp pulp and muscat flavour early<br />
ripening and has good keeping quality. Berry adherence<br />
is good and tolerant to berry splitting.<br />
Pusa Navrang x Flame Seedless<br />
| 6 |
<strong>Research</strong> Activities<br />
4. Vitis parviflora x Superior Seedless : Greenish, bold and seedless fruits, ripening is late,<br />
TSS 20°brix. It has distinct flavour unlike other vinifera grapes.<br />
5. Spin Sahebi x Sharad Seedless : Black seedless, medium bold berries, late ripening,<br />
excellent fruit quality with medium round berries. TSS<br />
20.2°brix and acidity 0.7%.<br />
6. Spin Sahebi x A 17-3 : Green seedless, medium bold,<br />
oval shaped, late ripening with attractive medium sized<br />
loose bunches. Fruit quality excellent and flavoured as<br />
that of male parent. Berry adherence is very good and<br />
berries have thick skin. TSS 20.2°brix and acidity 0.60%.<br />
7. Spin Sahebi x Crimson Seedless : Male sterile, straw<br />
green berries mostly seedless, bold and oval shaped.<br />
However, crossed / fertile berries show 1-2 seeds each.<br />
A late ripener and useful <strong>for</strong> cross breeding. TSS<br />
24.2°brix, acidity 0.7%.<br />
8. Katta Kurgan x Pusa Seedless : A late ripener.<br />
Bunch size 150 g, berries greenish transparent. TSS<br />
23.4°brix with low acidity of 0.42%.<br />
Spin Sahebi x A 17-3<br />
2.2.2 Breeding <strong>for</strong> high production and quality in wine grapes<br />
Wine variety Chardonnay was crossed with Pusa Navrang and Arkavati. The salient features of<br />
promising hybrids are as follows:<br />
1. Chardonnay x Pusa Navrang (White Early) : Uni<strong>for</strong>m early ripening at 110 DAP. TSS<br />
19.0°brix, average bunch size weighing 150 g. Good yielding potential.<br />
2. Chardonnay x Pusa Navrang (White medium) : Uni<strong>for</strong>m ripening at 120 DAP. Bunch<br />
weight is 250-310 g. TSS 20°brix, acidity 0.95%, pH 3.16. It has potential <strong>for</strong> 2 crops per year.<br />
3. Chardonnay x Pusa Navrang (Red Early) : Uni<strong>for</strong>m ripening, teinturier but flavoured<br />
berries. Ripening 115 DAP. TSS 19°brix, acidity 0.86%, pH 3.10.<br />
4. Chardonnay x Pusa Navrang (Red late) : Uni<strong>for</strong>m ripening,. 125 DAP, bunch is small and<br />
compact. TSS 18.0°brix with high acidity (1.5%) and has juice pH 2.9.<br />
5. Chardonnay x Arkavati-1 : Small bunch size (125 g) medium yielder, suited to high density<br />
planting. TSS 20°brix, acidity 0.7% and is late ripener (125 days DAP).<br />
6. Chardonnay x Arkavati-2 : Bold bunch size, good yielding (up to 12 kg/vine), fruits are slight<br />
pulpy, has low seed content. Vines have good canopy vigour.<br />
| 7 |
NRC <strong>for</strong> <strong>Grapes</strong> | Annual Report 2006-07<br />
7. Chardonnay x Arkavati-3 : Medium canopy vigour, very good<br />
yielding, uni<strong>for</strong>m ripening, Chardonnay like appearance of<br />
bunches and berries. It is suited to high density planting. It is a<br />
spur bearer.<br />
Chardonnay × Arkavati - 3<br />
2.3 Breeding <strong>for</strong> tolerance to biotic stress<br />
2.3.1 Breeding <strong>for</strong> downy mildew resistance<br />
A hybrid obtained through embryo rescue of Flame Seedless × Catawba cross was found promising.<br />
Berries are very small, seeded and crisp, bunches are loose, highly acidic and with muscat flavour.<br />
The vine is very vigorous and downy mildew tolerant and will be useful <strong>for</strong> further cross breeding.<br />
Ten different crosses were made using susceptible Flame Seedless and Thompson Seedless as male<br />
parents and resistant female parents such as SV-B2-25-III, SV B2-24-III, Seibel B2-32-II, Seibel B2-<br />
32-II and CBR (B2-14-III). About 7000 flowers were crossed out of which 3719 seeds were obtained.<br />
The progenies obtained will be used as segregating population <strong>for</strong> the identification of molecular<br />
markers linked with the downy mildew resistance.<br />
Programme 3.<br />
Application of biotechnological research in grapes<br />
3.1 Molecular tagging <strong>for</strong> commercially important traits<br />
3.1.1 Molecular tagging <strong>for</strong> downy mildew resistance in grape<br />
Microsatellite analysis of accessions<br />
Forty-four accessions were analysed with another 24 primers. However consistent results were<br />
obtained with only 18 primers. Thus this population has been analysed with 44 primers. Data <strong>for</strong> all<br />
the primers were scored and analysed. 44 primers detected a total of 433 alleles with an average of<br />
9.8 alleles per primer. The number of alleles detected by each primer ranged between 4-23<br />
(VVMD14).<br />
Microsatellite analysis of hybrids<br />
DNA from 44 hybrids was analysed with 4 micro satellite primers. Analysis with more primers,<br />
scoring and analysis is in progress.<br />
Structure analysis of accessions<br />
The microsatellite data was subjected to population structure analysis to estimate the number of<br />
populations in the studied material. Software STRUCTURE 2.1 was used with 100000 burnin length<br />
and 100000 run length. K value ranging from 1-8 was considered. The Ln probability of data was<br />
stabilized at 5 and a plateau was reached. There<strong>for</strong>e 5 populations were considered. All the<br />
susceptible accessions were grouped in one population whereas resistant accessions were distributed<br />
in several populations.<br />
| 8 |
<strong>Research</strong> Activities<br />
Association analysis<br />
i. Non parametric analysis<br />
Genotype data and field screening data of disease rating were analysed using non parametric test.<br />
The test compares means of two genotype classes. A total of 23 markers showed significant<br />
association with trait. 12 markers were present in resistant accessions whereas 11 were present in<br />
susceptible accession.<br />
ii. Regression analysis<br />
The significant markers present in resistant and susceptible accessions were separately subjected to<br />
multiple linear regression analysis. One susceptibility and one resistance marker was found to be the<br />
most significant with a R 2 value of 0.49 and 0.33 respectively.<br />
Cloning, sequencing and primer redesigning<br />
Three promising bands identified by non parametric and multiple regression analysis were excised<br />
from silver stained gel, reamplified, purified and cloned. The cloning was done in pGEM4 vector and<br />
trans<strong>for</strong>med into E. coli JM101 strain. The clones were sequenced and sequence data was used to<br />
design degenerate primers in an order to develop SCAR.<br />
3.3 Development of molecular techniques <strong>for</strong> variety and hybrid identification<br />
3.3.1 Analysis of genetic variation among clones of Thompson Seedless<br />
In an attempt to identify duplicate accessions and subsequently core collection <strong>for</strong> better germplasm<br />
management, vines of Thompson Seedless collected from different sources and its clones were<br />
analysed with eight microsatellite primers. The selected primers are highly polymorphic and<br />
probability of<br />
identical genotype<br />
<strong>for</strong> these primers is<br />
9.84 × 10 -14 .<br />
Several identical<br />
genotypes were<br />
identified. Variation<br />
was also detected <strong>for</strong><br />
many of the clones<br />
derived from<br />
Thompson Seedless.<br />
Figure 1 shows the<br />
difference in allelic<br />
pattern of 3 vines of<br />
Thompson Seedless.<br />
Fig. 1. Allele profile of 3 vines of Thompson Seedless <strong>for</strong> primer VVS2. Top - Thompson Seedless (France),<br />
Middle - Thompson Seedless (Italy) Bottom: Thompson Seedless (Cali<strong>for</strong>nia)<br />
| 9 |
NRC <strong>for</strong> <strong>Grapes</strong> | Annual Report 2006-07<br />
3.3.2 DNA profiling of important grape varieties <strong>for</strong> testing genetic purity<br />
Twenty eight commercially important varieties including rootstocks, wine varieties and table/raisin<br />
varieties were analyzed with six microsatellite primers and their allele profile was developed. This<br />
allele profile will be used <strong>for</strong> ascertaining their genetic purity at various stages of nursery propagation.<br />
Programme 4.<br />
Development of propagation and nursery technology<br />
4.1 Standardization of macro-propagation including advanced techniques <strong>for</strong><br />
rootstocks and commercial varieties<br />
4.1.1 Effect of different rootstocks and its maturity on graft success in Cabernet Sauvignon wine<br />
grapes.<br />
This experiment was conducted to study the effect of different rootstock and stock maturity on graft<br />
success in Cabernet Sauvignon wine grapes. The cuttings of Cabernet Sauvignon were grafted on<br />
Dogridge, 1613 C, St. George and Salt Creek rootstocks with different shoot maturity (mature, semi<br />
mature and green shoot). The growth per<strong>for</strong>mance of the grafted plants showed that the days <strong>for</strong><br />
bud sprout ranged from 15.06 in 1613C to 17.71 in Dogridge grafted vines. The vines grafted on<br />
Dogridge rootstock showed higher percentage of success as compare to vines grafted on others. The<br />
shoot length was also higher in the same rootstock. Higher stock scion ratio was noted in vines<br />
grafted on St. George rootstock as compared with Dogridge.<br />
In case of shoot maturity, semi matures shoots were early to sprout as compared to others. Percent<br />
successful grafts were also higher in the same shoot maturity. However, the green shoots recorded<br />
higher shoot length as compared to the semi mature and mature shoots. Maximum graft success was<br />
recorded in green shoots than mature and semi mature.<br />
4.1.2 Effect of different dates of propagation through hardwood cuttings on success in Dogridge<br />
rootstock.<br />
This experiment was conducted to study the effect of different dates of cuttings multiplication on<br />
success rate of rootstock. The hardwood cuttings of 8-10 mm diameter having 4 nodes were selected<br />
<strong>for</strong> the study. The cuttings were submerged in water <strong>for</strong> overnight and at the time of planting, basal<br />
end was dipped in 2000 ppm IBA solution. The cuttings were planted on four different times with<br />
interval of 15 days. The results indicated that the cuttings planted on 24 th June had higher shoot<br />
length (111.49), total length of primary (307.80 cm) and secondary (671.03 cm) roots, average root<br />
diameter (1.59 mm) as compared to the other dates of planting. The fresh weight of roots was also<br />
higher (24.0 g) as compared to other timings of multiplications. However, the percent dry matter of<br />
roots was less in the same treatment as compared to other planting time. Higher per cent success<br />
rate (94.0%) was also recorded in the same treatment.<br />
| 10 |
<strong>Research</strong> Activities<br />
Programme 5.<br />
Use of rootstocks <strong>for</strong> grape cultivation<br />
5.1 Standardization of rootstocks <strong>for</strong> table and raisin grapes<br />
5.1.1 Influence of rootstocks on table grapevine physiology and biochemistry<br />
Thompson Seedless<br />
No significant differences were observed in pruning weights of Thompson Seedless vines (own rooted<br />
and grafted on 5 rootstocks) during 5 th year of the study. Early bud burst and more number of sprouts<br />
were recorded in Thompson Seedless grafted on 110 R followed by 99 R, 1103 P and St. George.<br />
Delayed sprouting was observed on Dogridge. No significant difference was observed <strong>for</strong> cane<br />
diameter, though it was highest on Dogridge. Lesser stock scion ratio on Dogridge indicates its more<br />
vigour to the scion. Among rootstocks no significant differences were observed in total phenolic and<br />
flavonoid compounds during full bloom stage. Total protein content significantly differed among<br />
rootstocks and it was highest in 110 R rootstock followed by Dogridge. No significant differences<br />
were observed <strong>for</strong> most of the gas exchange parameters during full bloom stage. However, water use<br />
efficiency at single leaf level was recorded maximum on Dogridge followed by those on 110 R, 1103<br />
P and 99 R. Significant differences were observed <strong>for</strong> most of the yield and quality parameters.<br />
Rootstock 110 R recorded highest number of bunches and yield per vine, but average bunch weight,<br />
berry diameter and berry length was highest on Dogridge followed by those on 110 R. No significant<br />
difference was observed <strong>for</strong> raisin recovery among rootstocks.<br />
Tas-A-Ganesh<br />
Per<strong>for</strong>mance of Tas-A-Ganesh grafted on Dogridge, B2-56, 110 R and own rooted Tas-A-Ganesh<br />
were studied <strong>for</strong> six years from 2000-01 to 2006-07. During sixth year no significant differences in<br />
vegetative characters like pruning weight and number of sprouts were observed. Significant difference<br />
was observed <strong>for</strong> total phenolic content during pre bloom stage with maximum on 110 R followed<br />
by own rooted vines. The incidence of downy mildew on bunches was lesser on 110 R and own<br />
rooted vines and higher incidence was on Dogridge. More phenolic compounds recorded in 110 R<br />
followed by own rooted vines and the least was recorded on Dogridge rootstock.<br />
5.1.2 Variation in biochemical composition in leaves and berries of Thompson Seedless grafted<br />
on different rootstocks during berry developmental stages<br />
The changes in biochemical composition of leaves and berries of Thompson Seedless (grafted on 5<br />
rootstocks and own rooted) was monitored at 3-4 mm, 8-10mm, veraison and harvesting. The<br />
second year data revealed significant differences <strong>for</strong> leaf phenolic compounds during pre veraison<br />
stage of sampling, where in Thompson Seedless grafted on St. George recorded maximum phenols<br />
and flavonoids while total flavon - 3 ols was maximum in ungrafted Thompson Seedless. There was<br />
gradual reduction in total phenolic contents from I stage (3-4 mm) to harvest stage of sampling. But,<br />
with the maturity of the leaves, there was slight reduction in phenolic compounds and individual<br />
groups. The reduction was highest in leaves of ungrafted Thompson Seedless and those grafted on<br />
St. George and 99 R. The slight reduction was observed in leaves of Thompson Seedless grafted on<br />
110 R, Dogridge and 1103 P.<br />
Similarly, total phenolics, individual groups of phenols and total protein content in berries during<br />
different developmental stages showed significant differences, wherein maximum berry phenolic<br />
compounds and individual phenolics groups during two stages (3-4 mm and 8-10 mm berries) of<br />
berry sampling and was maximum in Thompson Seedless grafted on Dogridge, 1103 P and 110 R<br />
| 11 |
NRC <strong>for</strong> <strong>Grapes</strong> | Annual Report 2006-07<br />
rootstocks. Compared to reduction in phenolic contents of leaves from I stage to harvest stage, there<br />
was greater reduction in these compounds in berries of ungrafted and grafted Thompson Seedless<br />
berries. There was gradual reduction in total phenolic content of berries from veraison stage (stage<br />
III) till harvest in all the rootstocks. Protein content in the berries showed an increasing trend till<br />
veraison and later it decreased during ripening (Fig 2).<br />
Total proteins (mg/g fresh wt)<br />
25<br />
20<br />
15<br />
10<br />
5<br />
I stage II stage III stage IV stage<br />
0<br />
Dogridge 110 R 1103 P 99 R St. George Thompson<br />
Rootstocks<br />
Seedless<br />
Fig. 2. Total proteins in Thompson<br />
Seedless grafted on different<br />
rootstocks during berry<br />
development stages<br />
Programme 6.<br />
Horticultural practices <strong>for</strong> quality and yield in table and wine<br />
grapes<br />
6.1 Standardization of canopy architecture<br />
6.1.1 Standardization of canopy architecture <strong>for</strong> Tas-A-Ganesh<br />
Effect of stems on yield and quality of grapes grafted on Dogridge rootstock under flat roof gable system of<br />
training<br />
This experiment was conducted <strong>for</strong> second consecutive year to study the per<strong>for</strong>mance of Tas-A-<br />
Ganesh vines grafted on Dogridge rootstock <strong>for</strong> comparison of the stems in long term. Results<br />
revealed that the growth per<strong>for</strong>mance in terms of vegetative growth i.e., shoot length and diameter,<br />
number of canes per vine was higher in case of double stem as compared to the single stem. The<br />
average bunch weight, 50-berry weight, berry diameter and yield per vine were recorded higher in<br />
Tas-A-Ganesh vines grafted on Dogridge rootstock and trained with double stem as compared to the<br />
single stem. In general, the yield in double stem was significantly higher (13.77 Kg) than single stem<br />
(11.07 Kg). Number of bunches/vine was significantly higher in double stem than in the single stem<br />
vines. This confirms the better per<strong>for</strong>mance of Tas-A-Ganesh vines grafted on Dogridge rootstock<br />
trained with double stem.<br />
Effect of stems on yield and quality of grapes trained on bower system of training<br />
Majority of the vineyards are trained on bower system of training. The grafting is per<strong>for</strong>med on two<br />
shoots of the rootstock. In many of the cases both the grafts are successful out of which only one is<br />
trained to bower. But, in majority of the cases both the shoots are trained that becomes the stem or<br />
trunk. An experiment was conducted to study the effect of stems in bower trained Tas-A-Ganesh<br />
vines. The data revealed that the vines on double stem per<strong>for</strong>med better in terms of growth<br />
per<strong>for</strong>mance and also the yield per vine. However, with the increase in bunch numbers it was found<br />
that the quality in terms of berry diameter gets reduced.<br />
| 12 |
<strong>Research</strong> Activities<br />
Comparison of grafted vines with own rooted Tas-A-Ganesh vines<br />
The objective of conducting the experiment was to confirm long-term effect of Tas-A-Ganesh vines<br />
grafted on Dogridge rootstock with the own rooted vines under flat roof gable system of training. The<br />
growth per<strong>for</strong>mance in terms of shoot length, cane diameter, number of shoots per vine and leaf<br />
area per shoot was recorded higher in case of Tas-A-Ganesh vines grafted on Dogridge rootstock as<br />
compared to the own rooted vines <strong>for</strong> the second consecutive year.<br />
The yield per<strong>for</strong>mance in terms of biomass, number of bunches per vine, 50-berry weight, average<br />
bunch weight, berry diameter and yield per vine was higher in the grafted vines as compared to the<br />
own rooted vines.<br />
Effect of training modification on yield and quality of Tas-A-Ganesh vines grafted on Dogridge rootstock<br />
An experiment was conducted to study the effect of different training modification on growth and<br />
yield of Tas-A-Ganesh vines grafted on Dogridge rootstock. The vines were trained on flat roof gable<br />
with different modification by varying the numbers of cordons and also the directions (horizontal and<br />
vertical). In the present study, it was observed that the shoots positioned vertically were more fruitful<br />
than the horizontally placed shoots. The numbers of shoots were higher in case of four cordons either<br />
placed vertically or horizontally followed by double cordons and single cordons. The shoot length and<br />
cane diameter were higher in case of single cordon placed horizontally. The cane diameter was less<br />
in case of four cordons either placed horizontally or diagonally. This might have been due to the<br />
dilution effect. As the number and length of cordon increased, the cane diameter was reduced.<br />
The yield per<strong>for</strong>mance in terms of number of bunches per vine was higher in case of the vines trained<br />
with four cordons followed by double and single cordons placed either horizontally or vertically. The<br />
average bunch weight was higher in single cordon placed horizontally as compared to the double and<br />
four cordons. The average bunch weight was less in case of four cordons placed either horizontally<br />
or vertically as compared to the other type. Though the yield per vine was higher in case of four<br />
cordons, the berry diameter was reduced drastically. The increased in number of bunches per vine<br />
reduced the berry diameter. This might be due to the competition of number of <strong>for</strong> their nutrient<br />
requirement resulted in to the reduction in the quality of the bunches.<br />
Effect of training modification on yield and quality of own rooted vines<br />
Though the growers have realized the importance of rootstock in raising the vineyards, there are still<br />
many grape gardens raised on their own roots. Considering this, an experiment was conducted to<br />
study the effect of own rooted Tas-A-Ganesh vines trained on the flat roof gable system of training.<br />
The vines were trained with single, double and four cordons either placed diagonally or horizontally.<br />
It was observed that the growth per<strong>for</strong>mance in terms of shoot length and cane diameter was higher<br />
in case of single cordon as compared to other treatments. The number of bunches per vine, average<br />
bunch weight and berry diameter was higher in case of single cordon followed by double and four<br />
cordons either placed vertically or horizontally. The total yield per vine was higher in case of four<br />
cordons but the yield in terms of quality i.e., berry diameter and average bunch weight was less in<br />
four cordons placed horizontally or vertically as compared to the other types. The quality yield (berry<br />
size >18 mm, TSS 18-20°B, bunch weight 350-500 g) was recorded in case of single cordons and<br />
double cordons as compared to the four cordons modification in the same training system.<br />
| 13 |
NRC <strong>for</strong> <strong>Grapes</strong> | Annual Report 2006-07<br />
Per<strong>for</strong>mance of own rooted and grafted vines trained on bower system<br />
The per<strong>for</strong>mance of own root in comparison with the grafted vines was the main objective of the<br />
experiment. Both type of vines were trained to bower. Preliminary study showed significant<br />
differences <strong>for</strong> growth and quality parameters in Tas-A-Ganesh vines trained on bower system. The<br />
grafted vines per<strong>for</strong>med well in terms of growth parameters i.e. shoot length, cane diameter, leaf<br />
area, number of shoots per vine, etc. and yield parameters i.e. number of bunches per vine, average<br />
bunch weight, berry diameter, 50-berry weight, yield per vine, etc.<br />
Effect of bunch load on colour development in Sharad Seedless and Flame Seedless grapes grafted on<br />
Dogridge rootstock<br />
This experiment was conducted to study the effect of bunch load in achieving the uni<strong>for</strong>m bunch<br />
colour in Sharad Seedless and Flame Seedless grapes grafted on Dogridge rootstock.<br />
The bunch load per vine varied from 30 per vine to 90 bunches per vine. It was observed that with<br />
the increase in number of bunches, there was decrease in percent uni<strong>for</strong>m colour bunches per vine.<br />
The days taken <strong>for</strong> colour development were increased with the increase in bunch load per vine. 50-<br />
berry weight and berry diameter was also recorded higher with the minimum number of bunches<br />
retained per vine. Significant differences were also recorded <strong>for</strong> quality yield per vine. The increase<br />
in number of bunches per vine resulted in the reduction in the berry size. Significant differences were<br />
recorded <strong>for</strong> internal CO 2 concentration and also transpiration rate. No significant difference were<br />
recorded <strong>for</strong> stomatal conductance. 50 bunches per vine were found to be optimum to produce better<br />
quality grapes. The same trend was recorded <strong>for</strong> Flame Seedless grapes.<br />
6.5 Protected cultivation <strong>for</strong> improving quality of grapes<br />
6.5.1 Effect of shading material on yield and quality of grapes grafted on Dogridge rootstock<br />
An experiment was conducted to study the effect of different shading material on yield and quality of<br />
Tas-A-Ganesh grapes grafted on Dogridge rootstock. The vines were covered with different shading<br />
material HDPE plastic, green and black shade nets, gunny cloth, sarees etc.<br />
Average bunch weight and berry diameter was recorded higher in plastic covered vines followed by<br />
green coloured shade nets (with 50% light) and gunny cloth as compared to the control where no<br />
shading material was used. TSS was also recorded to be higher in case of plastic covered vines. Yield<br />
per vine was also higher in plastic covered vines followed by green coloured shade nets as compared<br />
to the control vines. However, the differences <strong>for</strong> photosynthesis were found to be non significant.<br />
The rate of stomata conductance was higher in green shade nets followed by sarees and gunny cloths<br />
treatment. The rate of transpiration was also higher in green shade nets as compared to other<br />
shading material. The overall per<strong>for</strong>mance was recorded better in plastic followed by bunches<br />
covered with green shade nets.<br />
Programme 7.<br />
Nutrient and soil management in grapes<br />
7.2 Developing petiole nutrient guides <strong>for</strong> wine grapes<br />
7.2.1 Developing petiole nutrient guides <strong>for</strong> Cabernet Sauvignon<br />
Petiole samples were analysed and yield and quality parameters were recorded from wine Cabernet<br />
Sauvignon vineyards from the Nasik region between 2005-2007. A database is being maintained. At<br />
| 14 |
<strong>Research</strong> Activities<br />
growers farm at Dindori, data were recorded <strong>for</strong> vines raised on own roots and vines grafted on 110R<br />
(Vitis berlandieri x Vitis rupestris) and Dogridge (Vitis champini) rootstock being irrigated with<br />
irrigation water having low salinity (EC= 0.60 - 0.65 dS/m) during 2005-06 and 2006-07. No<br />
significant differences were observed with respect to yield amongst different stock scion combinations<br />
during both the years.<br />
Effect of different stocks on tissue nutrient contents<br />
Nutrient concentration in tissues was affected significantly by the stock. During 2005-2006 fruiting<br />
season nutrient concentrations in the petioles (5 th leaf position) during full bloom stage and 7 th leaf<br />
position 60 days after pruning were studied. Own rooted vines contained significantly higher K, Mg,<br />
Na and Zn, Na and chloride content in petioles compared to vines grafted on Dogridge and 110R<br />
rootstock at 45 full bloom stage. Vines grafted on 110R and own rooted vines also contained<br />
significantly higher P content in petioles.<br />
At sixty days after pruning also own rooted vines and vines grafted on 110R rootstock contained<br />
significantly higher P content compared to vines grafted on Dogridge rootstock. At this stage the<br />
differences with respect to K were not significant among grafted and ungrafted vines and the grafted<br />
vines contained significantly less chloride content. The Mg content was significantly higher in the<br />
petioles of own rooted wines compared to vines grafted on Dogridge rootstock. Lowest<br />
concentration was observed in Dogridge rootstock. At 90 days 110 R and Dogridge rootstocks<br />
contained significantly higher K than Salt Creek.<br />
During 2006-07 nutrients content in petioles (5 th leaf position) opposite to bunch was determined at<br />
full bloom stage. K, Na and Zn, Na and chloride content was significantly higher in petioles (5 th leaf<br />
position) of own rooted vines compared to vines grafted on Dogridge and 110 R rootstock. Petiole<br />
P content was significantly higher in own rooted as well as vines grafted on 110R rootstock<br />
compared to vines grafted on Dogridge rootstock. Nutrient content in petioles and blades in middle<br />
leaves (7-10 th leaf position) at full bloom stage was also studied. Both petioles and lamina of own<br />
rooted vines contained significantly higher Mg, Zn, Na and chloride content compared to vines<br />
grafted on Dogridge and 110 R rootstock. Petioles K content was significantly higher in own rooted<br />
vines compared to grafted vines, however, differences were not significant in lamina. The above<br />
results revealed that nutrient uptake pattern was significantly affected by the stock system.<br />
7.4 Techniques to improve nutrient use efficiency in grapes including farm waste<br />
recycling<br />
Effect of rootstock on nutrient uptake and yield and yield parameters in Thompson Seedless vines<br />
During the period the nutrient content in vines was studied at different stages and the data were<br />
recorded to study the effect of rootstocks on nutrient uptake pattern of the vines. Rootstock effect<br />
was significant with respect to some nutrients. All the three rootstocks (Salt Creek, Dogridge and 110<br />
R) significantly reduced the chloride content in the petioles at all the stages (45, 60,75 and 90 days<br />
after pruning) of sampling during fruiting season 2005-2006. Vines grafted on Salt creek significantly<br />
higher chloride content than the other two rootstocks. Significantly less sodium content in petioles<br />
of Thompson Seedless vines grafted on 110 R stock at all the stages compared to other stock scion<br />
combinations. At 60 and 90 days Thompson Seedless on Dogridge and Salt Creek contained<br />
significantly higher Na than self rooted Thompson Seedless vines in petioles.<br />
| 15 |
NRC <strong>for</strong> <strong>Grapes</strong> | Annual Report 2006-07<br />
At 45 and 60 days, 110R stock resulted in significantly higher P concentration than other rootstocks<br />
lowest concentration was observed in Dogridge rootstock. Own rooted vines significantly higher<br />
petiole P content then vines grafted on Dogridge rootstock at 60, 75 and 90 days. At 45 days<br />
petioles of own rooted vines had significantly higher K content compared to the three rootstocks. At<br />
90 days 110R and Dogridge rootstocks coned significantly higher K than Salt Creek. Significantly<br />
higher Zinc concentration was observed in the petioles of own rooted vines compared to grafted<br />
vines at all the stages of sampling.The studies were continued <strong>for</strong> the fruiting season 2006-07 also.<br />
Self-rooted vines contained significantly higher K than the vines raised on rootstocks at 45 days<br />
during foundation pruning 2006-2007. The vines on Salt creek rootstocks had significantly higher P<br />
content compared to vines raised on 110R. All the three rootstocks resulted in significantly less<br />
chloride concentration that own rooted vines. Significantly less Na content was found in case of vines<br />
raised on 110R rootstock compared to Dogridge and Salt Creek. Studies with respect to other<br />
nutrients and other stages are in progress.<br />
110 R rootstock resulted in significantly higher bunch number per vine during the fruiting season<br />
2006-2007. All the rootstocks produced significantly higher yield than own rooted vines. Yield per<br />
vine was highest in case of 110 R / Thompson Seedless combination and was significantly higher<br />
than Dogridge / Thompson Seedless combination. Shelf life studies showed that per cent<br />
physiological loss of water from bunch was highest in case of own rooted vines. After 8 days at<br />
ambient laboratory temperature the physiological loss in weight (PLW) was significantly higher in case<br />
of own rooted vines (14.76%) than the grafted vines. All the three rootstocks did not differ<br />
significantly with respect to the PLW.<br />
Rootstock effect on zinc content in Tas-A-Ganesh tissues (2002-2006)<br />
The vine tissues were sampled and analysed 12 times at different growth stages from the same vines<br />
between 2002-2006. The concentration of the zinc was always significantly higher in petioles of own<br />
rooted compared to grafted vines at all the stages of sampling. In 10 out of 12 sampling stages there<br />
was no significant different in zinc content in the petioles of vines grafted on 110 R and those grafted<br />
on Dogridge rootstock. The blades of own rooted vines also had significantly higher zinc content.<br />
The vines grafted on the two rootstocks also did not differ in zinc uptake. The variations in Zn<br />
concentrations observed in the tissues did not reflect in yield of the vines. The data pointed out that<br />
the own rooted vines might require different rates of zinc applications compared to grafted vines to<br />
maintain the same concentration in the vine parts.<br />
Studies on evaluation of grapevine rhizosphere and non-rhizosphere fungi <strong>for</strong> P solubilization<br />
Twelve Aspergillus isolates isolated from the rhizosphere and non- rhizosphere soils of the<br />
grapevines were evaluated <strong>for</strong> the P solubilization in the laboratory. All the isolates from rhizosphere<br />
and non- rhizosphere solubilized the P from added calcium triphosphate (250 ppm P) ranging from<br />
124.3 ppm to 178 ppm compared to only 3.3 ppm in the absolute control after 5 days of<br />
incubation. The higher content of solubilized P in case of above isolates was supported by more<br />
reduction in the pH of the media. The lowest solubilization of P was observed in case of isolate<br />
number 12 and the smallest zone diameter were also observed in the same isolate. The reduction in<br />
pH in comparison to the control was also least in case of same isolate. Further studies in this respect<br />
are in progress.<br />
| 16 |
<strong>Research</strong> Activities<br />
7.4.2 On farm wastes recycling<br />
An experiment has been conducted on effect of recycling of pruned biomass and graded levels of N<br />
of Sharad Seedless grapes. The treatment differences were not significant after the first year of the<br />
experimentation. The experiment is continued.<br />
7.5 Studies on nutrient disorders<br />
7.5.2 Nutrient composition of tissues in vines exhibiting black leaf symptoms<br />
Variations in the nutrient content of healthy (no visual symptoms on leaves) and affected (leaves with<br />
visual symptoms) present on the same vine were studied, as all the leaves did not exhibit the leafblackening<br />
symptom. The soil analysis after the appearance of the symptoms was not conclusive.<br />
The tissue samples (petiole, leaf blade from top to bottom on a shoot) were collected from the healthy<br />
and affected shoots of the same vine (Thompson Seedless grafted on Dogridge rootstock). The rachis<br />
of the bunch from the same shoots were also analysed during fruit ripening stage, <strong>for</strong> macro and<br />
micronutrients. Petioles, leaf blades and rachis from affected vine parts contained significantly lower<br />
K and higher Na and Cl content. The P content in tissues of the affected shoots was also reduced<br />
significantly. The results corroborated our findings of earlier years that black leaf symptom in<br />
Thompson Seedless vines was caused by low potassium content as indicated by tissue analysis. The<br />
micronutrient cations Zn, Fe, Cu and Mn were not found associated with the development of the<br />
symptom.<br />
In order to know if chloride or sodium alone is associated with the symptoms development an<br />
experiment using sodium salts was conducted. The vines were sprayed with NaCl and Na 2 SO 4<br />
@ 0.50% be<strong>for</strong>e veraison stage and the symptom development was observed. The petioles and leaf<br />
blades were analysed <strong>for</strong> K, Na and chloride content. The sprays with these sodium salts resulted in<br />
marginal leaf burn but no blackening of the tissues was observed.<br />
Programme 9.<br />
Grape physiology including use of bioregulators<br />
9.1 Studies on pink berry in white grapes and its management<br />
9.1.2 Studies to find the root cause and its remedy through cell suspension culture<br />
Pink berry disorder results in reduction in export, increase loss of around crore rupees. To find out<br />
cause and its remedies work on cell suspension culture was initiated. The preliminary observations<br />
showed that the callus was generated from tender leaves, petioles, tendrils, berries and berry skin.<br />
The callus generated from above plant parts are ready <strong>for</strong> cell suspension culture. The trial <strong>for</strong> further<br />
investigations is in progress.<br />
9.1.3 Effect of nutrients on pink berry incidence in Thompson Seedless grapes<br />
Effect of nutrient sprays/bunch dipping was studied on the incidence of pink berry disorder in<br />
Thompson Seedless grapes. Potassium salts (potassium nitrate and potassium sulphate), Calcium salts<br />
(CaNO 3 , CaCl 2 ) were sprayed @ 0.5% ensuring full bunch coverage while laboratory grade<br />
orthophosphoric acid was used <strong>for</strong> bunch dipping @ 0.2 and 0.5% (v/v) basis. The treatments were<br />
imposed twice be<strong>for</strong>e (15 days) and at berry softening stage. Application of calcium chloride reduced<br />
the anthocyanin (520 nm) significantly compared to other treatments.<br />
| 17 |
NRC <strong>for</strong> <strong>Grapes</strong> | Annual Report 2006-07<br />
9.1.4 Role of bioregulators in pink berry development<br />
Effect of Antioxidants to avoid pink berry <strong>for</strong>mation in Thompson Seedless grapes<br />
The preliminary studies on pink berry incidence were conducted during this year on use of chemicals<br />
like anti-oxidants. The Anti-oxidants did not record the significant differences with respect to per cent<br />
pink berries in a bunch.<br />
Effect of polyamines on pink berry incidence in Thompson Seedless grapes<br />
The preliminary studies on pink berry incidence were conducted during this year by use of<br />
polyamines. In this experiment none of the treatment was effective to complete control of pink berry<br />
<strong>for</strong>mation.<br />
9.1.5 Influence of rootstocks and environment on development of pink berry in Seedless grapes<br />
Thompson Seedless<br />
Preliminary observations revealed significant<br />
difference between rootstocks in the incidence of<br />
pink berries. Least pink berry incidence was<br />
observed in Thompson Seedless grafted on 1613 C<br />
rootstocks followed by own rooted vines (25 - 30%).<br />
While on the other rootstocks like Dogridge, 110 R,<br />
1103 P, St. George, SO-4, 99 R, the incidence<br />
ranged from 70-80%. Total phenolic content was<br />
reduced in pink berries than in green berries, while<br />
total proteins (Fig. 3), anthocyanins, reducing sugar<br />
(Fig. 4) and TSS increased in pink berries. Strong<br />
positive correlation was observed between incidence<br />
of pink berries and reducing sugars, proteins and<br />
negative correlation between total flavonoids.<br />
Further detailed studies on individual anthocyanin<br />
derivatives and phenol derivatives, in pink berries<br />
will be carried out in the coming years.<br />
In another study on the incidence of pink berry in<br />
CPPU treated Thompson Seedless bunches, own<br />
rooted vines had significantly less numbers if pink<br />
berry bunches per vine (3.86 %) compared to those<br />
grafted on different rootstocks (43.57 -55.61%.)<br />
The self rooted vines had significantly less TSS<br />
content compared to that of grafted vines. The acidity (%) in berries was significantly higher in self<br />
rooted than those grafted on different rootstocks.<br />
Tas-A-Ganesh<br />
In another study the similar observations were recorded in two experimental plots of the centre on<br />
Tas-A-Ganesh vines grown on own roots and Dogridge, B2-56 and 110 R rootstocks where CPPU<br />
was not applied. The vineyards were raised under uni<strong>for</strong>m fertilization and irrigation and other<br />
cultural practices during current year. The observations were recorded on 06-03-2007. Similar to<br />
Thompson Seedless vines the Tas-A-Ganesh vines grown on own roots had lowest (significantly less)<br />
Total proteins (mg / g)<br />
6<br />
5<br />
4<br />
3<br />
2<br />
1<br />
0<br />
| 18 |<br />
Pink<br />
Green<br />
Dogridge 110R 1103 P 99 R St. 1613 C Salt<br />
George Creek<br />
Rootstocks<br />
SO-4 Thompson<br />
Seedless<br />
Fig. 3. Total protein content in pink and green<br />
T. seedless berries<br />
Reducing sugar (mg/g)<br />
100<br />
90<br />
80<br />
70<br />
60<br />
50<br />
40<br />
30<br />
20<br />
10<br />
0<br />
Dogridge<br />
Pink<br />
110R<br />
1103 P<br />
Green<br />
99 R<br />
St. George<br />
Rootstocks<br />
Fig. 4. Reducing sugars in pink and green<br />
berries<br />
1613 C<br />
Salt Creek<br />
SO-4<br />
Thompson Seedless
<strong>Research</strong> Activities<br />
number of bunches having pink berries compared to other stock scion combinations. The TSS<br />
content was also less in bunches having no visual pink discoloration in own rooted vines. However<br />
the berries of the own rooted vines having pink discoloration had significantly higher TSS content.<br />
The downy mildew infection on bunch stalks increased the percentage of pink berry affected bunches<br />
in all the stock scion combinations.<br />
9.1.6 Effect of paper cover bags on incidence of pink berry <strong>for</strong>mation Thompson Seedless<br />
grapes<br />
The specially made paper bags were used to cover the bunches in order to avoid pink berries vis-avis<br />
improvement in berry quality. The significant variation was observed between the covered<br />
bunches and without covering. The bunches which covered at 75 days after pruning did not show<br />
symptoms of pink berry <strong>for</strong>mation as 81.5% pink berries were observed in open bunches. Similar<br />
observations were recorded with number of pink berries in a bunch. TSS was observed more in open<br />
and partially covered bunches as compared to fully covered bunches. A reverse trend was observed<br />
with respect to acidity.<br />
9.3 Standardization of bioregulators schedule <strong>for</strong> improving quality and yield of table<br />
and wine grapes<br />
9.3.1 Standardization of bioregulators schedule <strong>for</strong> improving quality and yield of table grapes<br />
Effect of CPPU to improve berry quality and yield in Thompson Seedless grapes<br />
The CPPU (0.1%)was applied at 3-4 and 6-7 mm berry size stage as a dip. The data on berry and<br />
bunch characters revealed the significant differences in all the parameters except acidity of berry<br />
juice. Mean bunch weight was recorded significantly higher in CPPU and GA 3 treatment as<br />
compared to control (no application of any bioregulator) and the highest bunch weight was recorded<br />
when the CPPU was applied @ 2 ppm at 3-4 and 6-7 berry size stages. The similar results were<br />
observed with respect to 100- berry weight, berry diameter, berry length, pedicel thickness and yield<br />
per vine. However, TSS was recorded higher in control than the CPPU and GA 3 treatment.<br />
The physiological loss in weight (PLW) was observed <strong>for</strong> 7 days in shelf at room temperature after<br />
30 days of cold storage. The results revealed that the significant differences were recorded up to 3 rd<br />
day in shelf and the minimum physiological loss of weight was recorded in CPPU treatment as<br />
compared to control.<br />
Effect of stage and doses of GA 3 and CPPU on Thompson Seedless and Sharad Seedless in <strong>Grapes</strong><br />
To standardize the dose of GA 3 and CPPU <strong>for</strong> production of export quality grapes, the present study<br />
was conducted. The GA 3 @ 30, 40 and 50 ppm was applied, similarly CPPU @ 1.0 ml, 1.5 ml and<br />
2.0 ml per liter was applied at 3 mm, 4 mm and 6 mm berry size stage as a first dip after berry<br />
setting. The second dip was given at 8-9 mm berry size stage with 40 ppm GA 3 and 2 ppm CPPU.<br />
Effect of Biostimulants on berry quality of Thompson Seedless, Sharad Seedless and Flame Seedless grapes<br />
To keep leaves healthy biostimulants (stim rich, speed, kelpak, biozyme, fantac and biovita) are being<br />
used during the post lag phase which coincides with the cold climatic conditions. To see the effect<br />
locally available biostimulants were used to study their influence in Thompson Seedless, Sharad<br />
Seedless and Flame Seedless grapes. Variable response of biostimulants was observed in all the three<br />
grape varieties. In Thompson seedless only berry diameter was increased with the application of<br />
biostimulants. In Sharad Seedless, 50-berry weight and TSS was increased and in Flame Seedless<br />
| 19 |
NRC <strong>for</strong> <strong>Grapes</strong> | Annual Report 2006-07<br />
grapes, the biostimulants influenced the TSS and pedicel thickness. Confirmation, the study will be<br />
continued <strong>for</strong> second year.<br />
9.3.3 Quantification of endogenous levels of bioregulators at different stages in grape varieties<br />
Preliminary analysis of the grape varieties viz. Red Globe, Fantasy Seedless, Perlette, A-17/3 and<br />
Thompson Seedless at different phenological stages showed the variation in gibberellic acid, auxins<br />
and abscissic acid content. This trial is in continuation <strong>for</strong> con<strong>for</strong>mity.<br />
9.4 New chemicals / botanicals <strong>for</strong> improving budbreak, quality and yield of grapes<br />
9.4.1 Bio-efficacy of Fantac in grapes<br />
Fantac contains amino acids and considered as one of the bio-stimulant used to improve berry quality<br />
in grapes. The significant differences were recorded with the application of fantac with respect to<br />
pedicel thickness, berry length TSS and shelf life. The Application of fantac @ 1ml/litre recorded<br />
the more thick pedicels as compared to the other treatments. Like wise, berry length was recorded<br />
significantly more in T3 (Fantac @ 1.5 ml/litre) However, TSS was recorded significantly more in<br />
control than the fantac treatments. Physiological loss in weight was recorded the significant<br />
differences up to 5 days and the significantly less PLW was recorded in T3 treatment (Fantac: 1.5<br />
ml/litre). This indicates that the application of Fantac @ 1.5 ml/litre seems to be beneficial to obtain<br />
good quality grapes.<br />
9.4.2 Bio-efficacy of Green miracle in <strong>Grapes</strong><br />
Green miracle is an antitranspirant containing fatty acids. The significant differences were recorded<br />
with the spray of green miracle with respect to mean bunch weight, 100 berry weight berry size and<br />
yield/plant. The significant differences were also recorded in shelf life. Significantly higher bunch<br />
weight was recorded with the spray of green miracle @ 4 ml/litre. In general, the green miracle<br />
treatments recorded the higher bunch weight and 100 berry weight.<br />
The more berry diameter and length was recorded with the application of green miracle as compared<br />
to water spray and no application of green miracle. Yield/vine was also recorded higher in green<br />
miracle treatments. Physiological loss in weight was recorded significantly minimum in green miracle<br />
treatments up to 5 days.<br />
9.4.3 Bio-efficacy of Boomflower in grapes<br />
Boom flower contains nitrobenzene, which is used <strong>for</strong> improving the fruit quality. In the present<br />
study, 4 applications at different concentrations (0.1 - 2 ml/litre) were applied. The significant<br />
differences were recorded with the application of Boom flower with respect to berry diameter and<br />
pulp content. Though the differences were not significant, the yield/vine was also recorded higher in<br />
boom flower treatment (2.0 ml/litre). The same treatment recorded the least PLW during the storage<br />
up to 5 days.<br />
Programme 10. Studies on viticulturally important microorganisms<br />
10.1 Development of biofungicides <strong>for</strong> major diseases<br />
Isolation of antagonists<br />
A yeast and an actinomyetes exhibiting antogonistic properties were isolated from the vineyard.<br />
| 20 |
<strong>Research</strong> Activities<br />
10.4 Development of bio-remedial agents <strong>for</strong> pesticides<br />
Bio-remediation of triazole fungicides with pre-harvest sprays of <strong>for</strong>mulations of bio-control agents<br />
Trichoderma, Ampelomyces, Verticilium etc.<br />
1. A field trial conducted during fruiting season of 2006, indicated that sprays of Trichoderma<br />
during last 30 days be<strong>for</strong>e harvest, reduced the PHI of flusilazole from 48 days to 18 days. The<br />
results have useful practical application as this fungicide was used extensively during last 40 - 50<br />
days of harvest due to its excellent bio-efficacy, but was found in highest number of grape<br />
samples collected from vineyards producing exportable table grapes.<br />
2. In the second year field trial, during fruiting season of 2007, the results with Trichoderma was<br />
confirmed. Other bio-control agents viz. Verticillium lecanii, Ampelomyces quiscalis, and two<br />
isolates of Saccharomyces used <strong>for</strong> wine fermentation were also found to reduce PHI of<br />
flusilazole.<br />
3. The bio-remediation studies were also conducted at growers field in Niphad (Nasik) to study the<br />
degradation of hexaconazole and myclobutanil, the other two triazole fungicides used by grape<br />
growers during last 30-40 days of harvest, as their PHI is relatively less i.e. 30-38 days. However,<br />
no significant results were obtained.<br />
10.5 Development of native yeasts <strong>for</strong> wine making<br />
Twenty four yeast cultures were isolated from the surface of fruits and germinating cereals and pulses<br />
and analysed <strong>for</strong> sugar and alcohol tolerance. Isolates RS-1 from pea and SR-1 from wheat could<br />
tolerate up to 25% sugar and 11% alcohol.<br />
Programme 11. Integrated disease management in grapes<br />
11.1 Studies on the bioefficacy of fungicides and safer environmental profile products<br />
<strong>for</strong> management of major grape diseases<br />
11.1.1 Multilocational field trial on chemical control of downy mildew<br />
Until recently there were only few fungicides available in India <strong>for</strong> control of diseases caused by<br />
Phycomycetes in general and downy mildew of grapes in specific. However, in recent past lots of<br />
new chemicals are being used outside the country <strong>for</strong> the control of downy mildew of grapes. Some<br />
of the chemicals tested in our experiments have been listed below according to their group.<br />
Main group Subgroup Name of fungicide<br />
N-Phenyl amides – Metalaxyl-M<br />
QOI fungicides (Quinne Outside Inhibitors) Methoxy acrylates Azoxystrobin<br />
Methoxy carbamates Pyraclostrobin<br />
Oxymino acetates Kresoxim methyl, Trifloxy strobin<br />
Imidazolinones<br />
Fenamidone<br />
Cyanoacetamide oximes – Cymoxanil<br />
CAA fungicides (Carboxilic Acide Amides) Cinnamic acide amides Dimethomorph<br />
Valinamide carbamet Iprovalicarb<br />
Mandelic acide amide Mandipropamid<br />
Dithiocarbamates relatives – Metiram, Propineb,<br />
| 21 |
NRC <strong>for</strong> <strong>Grapes</strong> | Annual Report 2006-07<br />
Attempt was made to test the bio-efficacy of all these fungicides in one experiment. The experiment<br />
was conducted simultaneously at five locations covering major grapes growing area of Maharashtra<br />
State. Two locations were in Nasik district (Kalvan, and Chandori), two locations were in Sangli<br />
district (Nimni and Mhaisal), and one location was in Pune district (Narayangaon). The trial was<br />
conducted during fruiting season of October 2006 to April 2007. In case of all new fungicides the<br />
residue was estimated at harvest at <strong>National</strong> Referral Laboratory, using LC MS-MS. Fungicide doses<br />
standardized <strong>for</strong> control of downy mildew on leaves and bunches and residues detected at harvest<br />
have been given in Table 5.<br />
Between October to December 2006, 7 to 8 sprays of the fungicides were given at each location. It<br />
is important to note that in case of no fungicide the residue was detected above MRL. This indicates<br />
that all these fungicides are safe to use.<br />
Table 5. Optimum doses of the fungicides <strong>for</strong> control of downy mildew in grapes and their residue in grapes<br />
at harvest in comparison to MRL<br />
Fungicide and Formulation<br />
Optimum dose<br />
Average of<br />
residue detected<br />
at harvest (ppm)<br />
Mandipropamid 250SC 0.8 – 1.0 ml / l 0 – 0.002<br />
MRL of the<br />
fungicide in<br />
Europe (ppm)<br />
(Mandipropamid + mancozeb) 65WG 2.0 g / l 0 – 0.093 –<br />
(Metalaxyl M + mancozeb) 68WP 2.5 g / l 0 – 0.022<br />
(Ridomil Gold)<br />
(Metalaxyl M + mancozeb) 68WG 2.5 g / l 0.059 – 0.138<br />
Dimethomorph 50WP (Acrobat) 0.8 g / l – –<br />
Dimethomorph 50WP + mancozeb (0.75 g + 2.0 g ) / l 0 – 0.021<br />
78WP as Tank mix<br />
Metiram 70WG 2.0 g /l – –<br />
Pyraclostrobin 20WG 0.5 g / l 0.010 – 0.013<br />
(Metiram + pyraclostrobin) 60WDG 1.25 g / l 0 – 0.016<br />
Kocide 3000 1.25 g – 1.5 g / l – –<br />
Kocide 2000 1.25 g – 1.5 g / l – –<br />
(Iprovalicarb 5.5% + propineb 61.25%) 3.0 g / l 0.027 – 0.032<br />
66.75WP (Melodyduo)<br />
(Fenamidone 10 % + mancozeb 50%) 1.5 g / l 0.005 – 0.076<br />
60WG (Secure)<br />
Kresoxim methyl 500SC (RIL011) 1.0 ml / l 0.027 – 0.342<br />
(Captan 70%+ Hexaconazole 5%) 1.5 g / l – –<br />
75WP (Taquat)<br />
Captan 70WP 2.0 g / l – –<br />
Azoxystrobin 200 ml / acre 0.005 – 0.279<br />
| 22 |
<strong>Research</strong> Activities<br />
11.1.2 Chemical control of downy mildew by systemic fungicides after April pruning<br />
Four Sprays of Mandipropamid 250SC, 0.8 - 1.0 ml/l; (Mandipropamid + mancozeb) 65WG, 2.0<br />
g/l ; (Metalaxyl M + mancozeb) 68WP (Ridomil Gold), 2.5 g/l ; (Metalaxyl M + mancozeb) 68WG,<br />
2.5 g/l showed excellent control of downy mildew and retained leaves till October. Mandipropamid<br />
alone could not control rust disease on leaves, but did not cause leaf fall till October.<br />
11.1.3 Bio-efficacy of Thiophanate methyl in control of anthracnose and powdery mildew<br />
Four Sprays of Thiophanate methyl 70WP, 0.615 g/l showed good control of anthracnose and<br />
moderate control of powdery mildew till October. But the anthracnose on young shoots during<br />
September was not controlled effectively.<br />
11.2 Use of Kocide 2000 (copper hydroxide) after foundation pruning<br />
After foundation pruning, during monsoon, anthracnose, downy mildew are major disease problems<br />
in grapes. Recently, incidence of rust is also observed in Thompson seedless, especially after August.<br />
Since the damage caused by these diseases after foundation pruning is not very high, only Bordeaux<br />
mixture, 0.5 % is commonly used <strong>for</strong> control of these diseases. Apart from good control of the<br />
disease, retention of leaves till <strong>for</strong>ward pruning in October is the major objective. Even though the<br />
Bordeaux mixture is good in control of diseases, continuous use leaves dark spots on leaves, which<br />
interfere in photosynthesis. Tender growth show scorching symptoms due to copper toxicity. The<br />
new generation <strong>for</strong>mulation of copper hydroxide (Kocide 2000) was thus tested <strong>for</strong> its efficacy in<br />
control of all above mentioned diseases. Five sprays of Kocide-2000 @ 1.25 g/l (437.5 g metallic<br />
copper/ha) at 10-15 days interval from 15 th June - 27 th August 2006 showed optimum control of<br />
downy mildew, and rust on leaves after backward pruning and reduced leaf fall till the end of<br />
September. The disease control and leaf fall recorded in above treatment was similar to that in case<br />
of Bordeaux mixture 0.5 % which uses considerably high amount of metallic copper.<br />
Control<br />
Kocide-2000, 0.75 g/l<br />
Kocide-2000, 1.0 g/l<br />
Kocide-2000, 1.25 g/l<br />
Bordeaux Mixture 0.5%<br />
Field view of the plants treated with above mentioned treatments. Note the reduction of leaves<br />
during September month as compared to control<br />
| 23 |
NRC <strong>for</strong> <strong>Grapes</strong> | Annual Report 2006-07<br />
11.3 Identification of new grape diseases<br />
Survey <strong>for</strong> incidence of virus diseases in wine varieties<br />
Symptoms of Grapevine Leaf Roll associated virus (GVLRaV) were observed in 1 year to 5 year old<br />
vineyards at Narayangaon, Dindori (Nasik) and presence of GVLRaV 1+3 strain was confirmed with<br />
ELISA tests.<br />
The corky bark and stem pitting symptoms of Rugose Wood Complex were also observed in Shiraz<br />
variety at one vineyards in Baramati and at one vineyard in Niphad (Nasik). Work on confirmation of<br />
presence of virus in the affected vineyards is in progress by calling a meeting of all stakeholders.<br />
The report of the survey was prepared and submitted to plant quarantine officers of the Central and<br />
State Govts. <strong>for</strong> necessary action.<br />
GVLRaV 1+3 was detected from leaves samples collected from private vineyards at Dindori and<br />
Narayangaon, using ELISA tests.<br />
11.5 Studies on biology of grape pathogens<br />
11.5.1 Detection of oospores in downy mildew infected bunches<br />
Young bunches often show downy mildew infection without presence of downy growth of sporangia.<br />
Many times infection on leaves also is not seen in the vineyards, when bunches are infected. This<br />
creates doubt whether bunch is actually infected by downy mildew. The dead tissues in bunch, when<br />
observed under microscope showed abundant oospores of downy mildew. The presence of oospores<br />
in dead tissues on the young bunch can be a easy diagnostic test <strong>for</strong> the downy mildew infection on<br />
bunches, especially when downy growth of the sporangia is absent.<br />
11.5.2 Bunches with dead or discoloured tissues in which<br />
oospores were detected<br />
Attempts were made to detect oospores in downy mildew<br />
infected leaves collected from various infected vineyards<br />
across Maharashtra. The oospores were not detected in<br />
leaves. However, in most of the infected bunches oospores<br />
were detected. Most of the time downy mildew infected<br />
bunches remain in vineyards and later mixed in the soil. The<br />
oospores are the weather resistant spores of downy mildew<br />
and can survive in soil <strong>for</strong> years. It was there<strong>for</strong>e suggested that removal of downy mildew infected<br />
bunches from the vineyards and their burning will reduce the oospore inoculum from the vineyard.<br />
Table 6. Detection of oospores of downy mildew in different tissues in grapes<br />
Tissue<br />
No. of oospores at 100 x<br />
Leaves 0.00<br />
Pre-bloom bunch 56.00<br />
Bunch – Necrotic tissue 6.09<br />
Bunch – Discoloured 2.18<br />
Bunch – Green adjoining infected tissue 0.82<br />
| 24 |
<strong>Research</strong> Activities<br />
11.5.3 Development of single node segment explants <strong>for</strong> maintaining inoculum of powdery and<br />
downy mildew<br />
Explants from Thompson Seedless clone 2A and Tas-A-Ganesh and callus of Sharad Seedless are<br />
being developed <strong>for</strong> maintaining inoculum of Plasmopara viticola and Uncinula necator, the two<br />
bio-trophic pathogen causing downy and powdery mildews respectively, <strong>for</strong> different studies.<br />
11.5.4 Studies on "Effect of cultural conditions on growth and sporulation of Botryodiplodia<br />
theobromae"<br />
The effect of temperature, pH and nutrients on growth and sporulation in four isolates of<br />
Botryodiplodia theobromae Pat., known to cause various problems like arrested growth of shoots,<br />
lesions on canes and main stems etc. in grapevines under stress conditions, was studied.<br />
The optimum temperature <strong>for</strong> growth and sporulation <strong>for</strong> the isolates was 25°C. The optimum pH<br />
was 6 <strong>for</strong> isolates15/3, 17/3 and S. No. 120 while it was 7.5 <strong>for</strong> isolate 18/1.<br />
Programme 12. Integrated insect and mite pest management in grapes<br />
12.1 Studies on the management thrips and mites<br />
12.1.1 Survey <strong>for</strong> thrips and mites<br />
Thrips population was recorded throughout the year and highest population was observed during<br />
flowering period to early berry setting period i.e. November-December months. High incidence of<br />
mites was noticed during late winter and early summer months of January-February. Weather data<br />
was collected and studies on correlation and regression were made during 2006-07. Thrips and mites<br />
incidence was negatively correlated with rainfall<br />
Two species of thrips viz., Scirtothrips dorsalis and Haplothrips hawaiensis were found attacking<br />
the grapes in Maharashtra<br />
The mite causing the damage to grapes was identified as red spider mite Tetranychus urticae. More<br />
than 50% of the leaves were found infested with mites at Nasik division. The incidence of mite was<br />
also noticed in other parts of Maharashtra<br />
12.1.2 Screening of germplasm against thrips<br />
Different grape varieties and accessions were evaluated <strong>for</strong> their resistance to thrips. Five shoots per<br />
plant were observed <strong>for</strong> the incidence of thrips and each shoot was further divided into shoot tip,<br />
matured shoot and berries. Five plants were observed <strong>for</strong> each variety/accession. The varieties were<br />
rated on a scale of 1-10, with 1 being the most resistant and 10 being the most susceptible.<br />
Varieties/ accessions which showed least thrips attack were Tannat, Khalili, Lake Emerald, Malvasia<br />
Binca de Vaporis and Pinot Noir. Varieties/accessions, which were found most susceptible to thrips<br />
damage, were Thomson Seedless, Kishmish Belyi, 2A clone (Thompson Seedless), Coarna Regia,<br />
EC 36506, Pusa Urvashi, and Superior. It was found that most of the table grape varieties were more<br />
susceptible than wine varieties.<br />
12.1.3 Evaluation of bio-pesticides <strong>for</strong> thrips<br />
Biopesticides like Verticillium lecanii and Beauveria bassiana are commonly being used by grape<br />
| 25 |
NRC <strong>for</strong> <strong>Grapes</strong> | Annual Report 2006-07<br />
growers <strong>for</strong> the management of mealybugs. However, ef<strong>for</strong>ts were made to know their efficacy on<br />
thrips population during fruiting season. Initial results showed that these bio-pesticides were not as<br />
effective as neem <strong>for</strong>mulations and standard insecticide Spinosad 45 SC in reducing thrips<br />
population. Another microbial preparation of Psuedomonas fumosoresus was tested on mites<br />
during fruiting season and the same will be tested <strong>for</strong> one more season to confirm the results<br />
12.1.4 Evaluation of botanicals against thrips and mites<br />
Nimbicidine 1% (azadirachtin 10000 ppm) and another herbal preparation made out of neem and<br />
karanj were tried on thrips and mites <strong>for</strong> their bioefficacy, phyto-toxicity and effect on natural<br />
enemies.<br />
12.1.5 Evaluation of new generation insecticides <strong>for</strong> thrips and mites<br />
New generation chemical Fipronil 80 % WG (Regent) was tested <strong>for</strong> the management thrips.<br />
Heavy incidence of mites was noticed during fruiting season especially around Nasik. New generation<br />
acaricides like abamectin 1.9% EC (Vertimec) , fenpyroximate 5 SC and bio-pesticide Psuedomonas<br />
fumosoreus were tested <strong>for</strong> their bio-efficacy, effect on natural enemies and phytotoxicity.<br />
12.2 Studies on the management mealybugs<br />
12.2.1 Survey <strong>for</strong> mealybug species, ants and natural enemies<br />
Mealybug incidence was recorded during December to March with highest peak during harvesting<br />
months i.e. February-March month and incidence was continued in April wherever late pruning was<br />
observed.<br />
Four mealybug species viz., Maconellicoccus hirsutus, Planococcus citri, Nipaecoccus viridis and<br />
Pseudococcus longispinus were collected. Among them, M. hirsutus and P. citri were found causing<br />
severe loss. Eight species of ants viz., Componotus compressus, Componotus sericus, C.<br />
rufuglaucus, Tapinoma melanocephalum,. Monomorium sp., Techinomyrmix sp., Solenopsis<br />
geminata and Dolichoderus affinis were found associated with the mealybugs in the vineyards. iii.<br />
The green lacewing Chrysoperla carnea was commonly found in many of the vineyards as a predator<br />
of the mealybugs.<br />
12.2.2 Evaluation of safe chemicals <strong>for</strong> the management of mealybugs<br />
Bio-efficacy of mineral oil (Agro spray Oil) on mealybugs and its phytotoxicity, effect on natural<br />
enemies was studied in 2006-07 and mineral @ 0.5% was found to effective in suppressing<br />
mealybug colonies.<br />
12.2.3 Evaluation of new generation insecticides <strong>for</strong> mealybugs<br />
New generation insect growth regulator buprofezin 25 SC (Applaud) was tested <strong>for</strong> the management<br />
of mealybugs and found that @ 1.25 g/l was found to be effective.<br />
Soil drenching of imidacloprid 200 SL @ 1.5 ml/l/vine or imidacloprid 70 WG @ 0.45 g/l/vine<br />
was found to be effective in the management of mealybugs.<br />
Residue analysis <strong>for</strong> both these chemicals was also done and later they were included in the<br />
recommendation list.<br />
| 26 |
<strong>Research</strong> Activities<br />
12.2.4 Demonstration of lady bird beetles against mealybugs<br />
Demonstration trial was conducted in association with Project Directorate of Biological Control,<br />
Bangalore and Maharashtra State Grape Growers' Association, Pune in a farmer's grape garden at<br />
Tuljapur in Maharashtra, a total of 25,000 larvae Cryptolaemus montrouzieri were released<br />
@ 5000/ha from mid December to mid February. A mean of 0.95% bunch infestation was observed<br />
in March 2007 in the released plot as compared to 70.50% bunch infestation in March 2006 in the<br />
unreleased plot.<br />
12.2.5 Development of IPM <strong>for</strong> mealybugs<br />
During 2006-07 several components of IPM were tested <strong>for</strong> the management of mealybugs including<br />
removal alternate host plants and weeds, debarking, destruction of pruned material, soil drenching<br />
with imidacloprid , swabbing with dichlorvos, destruction of ant colonies, foliar spray with buprofezin,<br />
release of Australian ladybird beetle Cryptolaemus montrouzieri and foliar spray of neem<br />
<strong>for</strong>mulations near harvest helped in reducing mealybug incidence and to harvest residue free grapes.<br />
A mean of 1.84% bunch infestation was recorded in IPM plot as compared to 15.61 % in farmers<br />
practice and 25.50% in the untreated check plot.<br />
Programme 13. Management of agrochemical residues and environmental<br />
contaminants in grapes<br />
13.1 Studies on dissipation rates of new generation / other pesticides with reference to<br />
changing MRLs<br />
13.1.1 Persistence of buprofezin residues in grapes<br />
Persistence of buprofezin residues in grapes was explored at two locations, viz. NRC <strong>Grapes</strong>, Pune<br />
and Coimbatore. Degradation rate kinetics was explored at two doses and the estimated PHI was 40<br />
days considering the lowest MRL requirement of 0.02 mg/kg <strong>for</strong> the European Union countries.<br />
13.1.2 Persistence of spinosad residues in 4 different locations of India<br />
A multi-location residue trial was conducted at Pune, Madurai, Hyderabad and Bijapur at<br />
recommended (0.011 g a.i./ha) and double (0.022 g a.i./ha) doses. In all these locations, the<br />
residues of spinosad (Spinosyn A + Spinosyn D) degraded at similar rate. The PHI was found to be<br />
within 8 days considering the lowest MRL of 0.2 mg/kg applicable <strong>for</strong> the EU countries.<br />
13.3 Persistence studies of agrochemical residues in soil and water<br />
13.3.1 Effect of <strong>for</strong>chlorfenuron on soil microbial enzymes<br />
Changes in soil enzyme activities as a consequence of <strong>for</strong>chlorfenuron treatment were studied <strong>for</strong><br />
extra-cellular enzymes namely acid phosphatase, alkaline phosphatase and β-glucosidase and<br />
intracellular enzyme - dehydrogenase. Although small changes in enzyme activities were observed,<br />
<strong>for</strong>chlorfenuron did not have any significant deleterious effect on the enzymatic activity of the test<br />
soils. Simple correlation between degradation percentage and individual enzyme activities did not<br />
produce any significant relationships. The pattern and change of enzyme activity might primarily be<br />
the effect of the incubation period rather than the effect of <strong>for</strong>chlorfenuron itself. Forchlorfenuron<br />
posed to be of no threat to soil biological activity at recommended dose.<br />
| 27 |
NRC <strong>for</strong> <strong>Grapes</strong> | Annual Report 2006-07<br />
13.3.2 Effect of thiamethoxam on soil microbial enzymes<br />
Subsequent to the treatment of soils with thiamethoxam, the dehydrogenase enzyme activity<br />
increased at the beginning, indicating stress induced increase in microbial respiration on exposure to<br />
thiamethoxam. This however decreased at the end of the incubation period of 90 days. The initial<br />
impact on the activities of the extra-cellular enzymes, namely acid phosphatase, alkaline phosphatase<br />
and β-glucosidase also stabilized with time. Thiamethoxam, thus, did not have any significant<br />
deleterious effect on the microbial activity of the test soils on long-term basis.<br />
13.3.3 Sorption behaviour of <strong>for</strong>chlorfenuron on soils<br />
The sorption behaviour of <strong>for</strong>chlorfenuron in three soils of different physico-chemical properties viz.<br />
sandy-loam, clay and silty-clay was explored. The rate constants <strong>for</strong> the adsorption and desorption<br />
at two different temperatures were obtained from the Lindstrom model, which simultaneously<br />
evaluated adsorption and desorption kinetics. The data <strong>for</strong> rate constants, activation energies,<br />
enthalpy of activation, entropy of activation and free energy indicated chemical adsorption of<br />
<strong>for</strong>chlorfenuron on soil. The adsorptivity of different soils might be attributed to the organic matter<br />
and clay contents. A good fit to the linear and Freundlich isotherms was observed. Forchlorfenuron<br />
could be categorised as a chemical with low to medium leaching category.<br />
13.3.4 Sorption behaviour of thiamethoxam on soils<br />
The sorption behaviour of thiamethoxam in three Indian soils of major grapevine growing areas with<br />
different physico-chemical properties is reported. The soil types included clay, sandy-loam and siltyclay<br />
and had different ratios of sand, silt, clay and organic matter content. The data <strong>for</strong> the rate<br />
constants, activation energies, enthalpy of activation, entropy of activation and free energy indicated<br />
physical adsorption of thiamethoxam on soil. The adsorptivity of different soils might be attributed<br />
to the organic matter and clay contents. The extent of adsorption was maximum on sandy-loam soil,<br />
which also had maximum organic matter. A good fit to the linear and Freundlich isotherms was<br />
observed. Thiamethoxam could be categorised as a chemical with medium to high leaching potential.<br />
Programme 14. Development of post-harvest technologies<br />
14.5 Development of technologies <strong>for</strong> unfermented beverages and other products<br />
Bulk storage of fresh grape juice at low temperature (0°C) with least processing operation<br />
Juice of both coloured and colourless varieties obtained from the germplasm block was obtained by<br />
hand crushing without giving any treatment. Seeded and seedless varieties were also in the mixture.<br />
In few cases, the juice was treated to boiling, cooled and stored. However, in other cases, the juice<br />
was stored with following treatments :<br />
i. Juice without any preservative<br />
ii. Juice with the standard dose of sodium benzoate<br />
iii. Juice with the standard dose of potassium bisulphite<br />
iv. Juice with the standard mixture of sodium benzoate and potassium bisulphite<br />
Irrespective of treatments, the juice remained in acceptable quality without any microbial spoilage <strong>for</strong><br />
the period of one year at low temperature storage (0°C).<br />
| 28 |
<strong>Research</strong> Activities<br />
Programme 15. Development of in<strong>for</strong>mation and documentation systems<br />
15.1 Development of databases <strong>for</strong> various applications<br />
15.1.1 Grape germplasm in<strong>for</strong>mation system<br />
To implement RAC recommendations to make provision <strong>for</strong> data fields <strong>for</strong> E.C (exotic collection)<br />
number and I.C (Indigenous collection) number in the software, the E.C/I.C number fields were<br />
created in the database table. These fields were added to the data entry and modification screens and<br />
corresponding program code was written to store the values to the database. These fields were added<br />
to 'View germplasm in<strong>for</strong>mation' screen and the programming language code to show the field values<br />
were incorporated. The search and report module was updated <strong>for</strong> these fields. The help files were<br />
also modified. The software was tested <strong>for</strong> errors and rectified. An installation package was created.<br />
The software was installed on the computer of Scientist I/c <strong>for</strong> germplasm management at the<br />
<strong>Centre</strong> <strong>for</strong> feeding relevant data in the data box.<br />
15.1.2 In<strong>for</strong>mation system on molecular data <strong>for</strong> grape germplasm in India<br />
Designing and coding have been carried out <strong>for</strong><br />
1. Importing band size data from the Excel files in two different <strong>for</strong>mats.<br />
2. Module to search on data <strong>for</strong> band, primer and variety, this screen also facilitate 'Parentage<br />
analysis'.<br />
3. Module to identify variety.<br />
4. Reports module containing reports on<br />
• Band data : a) selected primers <strong>for</strong> a variety b) all primers <strong>for</strong> a variety<br />
• Varieties having same band data <strong>for</strong> a set of primers<br />
• Reports on accession details and primer details<br />
<br />
| 29 |
Collaborative, Externally Funded, Contract<br />
<strong>Research</strong> and Consultancy Projects<br />
I. Collaborative and externally funded projects<br />
i. <strong>National</strong> Referral Laboratory <strong>for</strong> monitoring pesticide residues <strong>for</strong> export of table grapes<br />
from India to EU countries<br />
(P. G. Adsule, K. Banerjee, A. K. Upadhyay, S. D. Sawant, R. G. Somkuwar, Anuradha Upadhyay,<br />
S. D. Ramteke, N. S. Kulkarni)<br />
This was the fourth year of the Residue Monitoring Plan, initiated by the APEDA in 2003-04 with<br />
<strong>National</strong> <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Centre</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Grapes</strong>, Pune through the <strong>National</strong> Referral Laboratory set-up under<br />
this institute. Presently three state Governments viz. Maharashtra, Andhra Pradesh and Karnataka<br />
are covered under this plan since exportable grapes are produced in these states. The farms from<br />
where table grapes are to be exported are registered with the Agricultural Departments of the<br />
respective grape growing states. The total registered farms <strong>for</strong> export of table grapes as per our<br />
records in these states were 16927 during 2006-07. Out of these farms, 16473 farms were from<br />
Maharashtra alone and 364 and 90 farms from Andhra Pradesh and Karnataka, respectively. The<br />
total area registered <strong>for</strong> export of table grapes was about 11323.88 hectares as against the estimated<br />
acreage of 60,000 hectare in the country.<br />
A total of 5751 samples were analysed in nominated laboratories during this period. Initially 787<br />
Alerts were issued out of which 168 alerts were subsequently withdrawn on the basis of the resample<br />
analyses reports. Out of the 619 effective alerts, Maharashtra accounted <strong>for</strong> the highest number of<br />
alerts (596) followed by Andhra Pradesh (20) and Karnataka (3). Within Maharashtra, Nasik district<br />
accounted <strong>for</strong> the 412 alerts followed by Sangli (79), Latur (33), Ahmednagar (24), Pune (15), Satara<br />
(14), Solapur (11), Osmanabad (7) and Beed (1). In Andhra Pradesh, the alerts were mostly from<br />
Ranga Reddy (16) and Medak (4) districts. In Karnataka, alerts were issued from Bellary (3) district.<br />
In all, there were 49 pesticides <strong>for</strong> which MRL exceedance was noticed. A maximum of 182 alerts<br />
were issued <strong>for</strong> Buprofezin followed by thiamethoxam (143), flusilazole (97), methomyl (75),<br />
imidacloprid (35), spinosad (31), chlorpyriphos (25), carbendazim (20), lambda-cyhalothrin (17),<br />
oxydemeton-methyl (14), hexaconazole (11), dimethomorph (9), thiophanate-methyl (8), 4-bromo-2-<br />
chlorophenol (7), acephate (7), acetamiprid (7), iprobenphos (7), clothianidin (6), ethofenprox (6),<br />
ethylene thiourea (6), thiacloprid (6), triazophos (6), cypermethrin (5), monocrotophos (5),<br />
difenconazole (4), dimethoate(including omethoate) (4), fipronil (4), methamidophos (4), captafol (3),<br />
captan (3), chlorpyriphos-methyl (3), myclobutanil(3), propiconazole (3), cartap hydrochloride (2),<br />
dicofol (2), propargite (2), atrazine (1), diazinon (1), dichlorvos (1), flufenoxuron (1), metalaxyl (1),<br />
parathion-ethyl (1), parathion-methyl (1), permethrin (1) and quinalphos (1). However, in case of<br />
buprofezin (98), thiamethoxam (135), flusilazole (62) and imidacloprid (35) the alert was pertaining<br />
to the Germany only.<br />
On critical perusal of the results of the residue monitoring in 2006-07, it is evident that the<br />
percentage of the failed samples has reduced significantly from 23.69% to 12.43% in 2003-04 to<br />
2004-05 and 7.16% in 2005-06, which has further reduced to 6.76% in the current season of<br />
2006-07. This clearly shows the improvement in the management of pesticide residues in grapes at<br />
the country level through the implementation of this Residue Monitoring Program.<br />
| 30 |
Collaborative, Externally Funded, Contract <strong>Research</strong> and Consultancy Projects<br />
The centre prepared list of recommended chemicals and list of chemicals to be monitored <strong>for</strong><br />
guidance of the growers and monitoring of residues, respectively. The centre also monitored the<br />
nominated laboratories <strong>for</strong> compliance of good laboratory practices through regular inspection and<br />
guidance. During chain from field to packhouse be<strong>for</strong>e shipment, samples were randomly drawn and<br />
reanalyzed at NRL to cross-check the compliance to the standard operating procedures.<br />
<br />
Technology Assessed and Transferred<br />
Several technologies have been developed and assessed at the Institute during last three years.<br />
Some of the important technologies are<br />
1. Use of rootstocks <strong>for</strong> sustainable grape production under abiotic stress<br />
2. Irrigation schedule<br />
3. Rationalisation of fertilizer use<br />
4. Use of mulch and subsurface irrigation under water deficit conditions<br />
5. Use of bioregulators <strong>for</strong> improving grape quality<br />
6. Strategies <strong>for</strong> insect pest and disease management during last 50 days be<strong>for</strong>e harvest.<br />
7. Use of biocontrol agents<br />
8. Disease <strong>for</strong>ecasting based disease management<br />
The scientists disseminated these technologies to the grape growers through several field visits and<br />
participation in growers' seminar.<br />
Farm Visits<br />
Dr. N. S. Kulkarni visited vineyards at Tuljapur and Solapur on 25 th April and 20 th August 2006<br />
respectively to assess the mealybug incidence and suggested preventive measures. As a part of IPM<br />
of Mealybug, Ladybird beetles were released Bangalore in a vineyard of Tuljapur on 18 th September<br />
2006 in collaboration with Maharashtra State Grape Growers' Association and Project Directorate<br />
of Biological Control, Bangalore.<br />
Dr. S. D. Ramteke surveyed grape gardens in and around Chikhali area on 28 th May 2006 to<br />
understand the impact of high temperature prevailing in this region on vine growth and fruitfulness<br />
in grape after April pruning.<br />
Dr. J. Satisha visited cold storage units of Sangli region on 2 nd June 2006 to collect samples of<br />
raisins <strong>for</strong> their quality analysis and also to collect data on the raisin production and capacity of cold<br />
storages.<br />
| 31 |
NRC <strong>for</strong> <strong>Grapes</strong> | Annual Report 2006-07<br />
Dr. R. G. Somkuwar visited Tamil Nadu to study the grape vineyards in and around Cumbum valley<br />
<strong>for</strong> cultural practices followed by the grape growers of Tamil Nadu state during 19-22 nd August<br />
2006.<br />
Dr. S. D. Ramteke visited vineyards of Satana and Kalwan area <strong>for</strong> bunch development and early<br />
crop on 29 th November 2006.<br />
Dr. S. D. Ramteke, Dr. S. D. Sawant and Dr. J. Sharma visited vineyards in and around Solapur<br />
especially in the Akkalkot area from 15 th to 17 th December 2006 affected by toxicity as per the<br />
instructions of Director and collected samples <strong>for</strong> analysis at the <strong>Centre</strong><br />
Dr. S. D. Ramteke surveyed grape vineyards in Solapur, Nasik and Sangli area <strong>for</strong> pink berry<br />
incidence on 8 th January, 7 th February and 12 th February 2007 respectively.<br />
Dr. G. S. Karibasappa and Dr. Anuradha Upadhyay visited vineyard in Kalamb, near Narayangaon<br />
on 17 th January 2007 to verify a clonal selection from Sharad Seedless and planned future<br />
experiments.<br />
Dr. P. G. Adsule, Director, Dr. G. S . Karibasappa, Dr. J. Sharma and Dr. J. Satisha visited Nimbkar<br />
Agricultural <strong>Research</strong> Institute, Phaltan on 29 th March 2007 to see the per<strong>for</strong>mance of newly<br />
introduced varieties under APEDA sponsored trial and advised Local Coordinator to control the<br />
vigour of Red Globe and Crimson Seedless to increase fruitfulness by spraying cycocel, to reduce the<br />
application of nitrogen fertilizers and to withheld irrigation <strong>for</strong> few days.<br />
Dr. S. D. Sawant and Dr. Indu S. Sawant along with Dr. J. M. Khilari, President, Maharashtra State<br />
Grape Growers' Association surveyed vineyards of wine varieties <strong>for</strong> presence of virus diseases in<br />
Nasik, Baramati and Narayangaon during February - March 2007. Grape growers were advised to<br />
plant only certified disease free plants as virus diseases mainly spread to vineyards through planting<br />
material. Growers were also advised to control mealybugs well as it has potential to transmit diseases.<br />
Participation in Growers' Seminar<br />
Dr. S. D. Sawant, Dr. R. G. Somkuwar, Dr. A. K. Upadhyay, Dr. S. D. Ramteke, Dr. J. Sharma and<br />
Dr. N. S. Kulkarni participated in the Charchasatra organized by Maharashtra State Grape Growers'<br />
Association at Sangli on 24 th April, Nasik on 27 th April, Narayangaon on 28 th April and Solapur on<br />
9 th May 2006 and guided the growers on the vineyard practices to be followed after April pruning.<br />
Dr. R. G. Somkuwar delivered lecture on cultural practices and canopy management in the seminars<br />
organized by different agencies at Jalna, Amdapur, Golegaon, Junnar, Jath, Dindori, Baramati, Nasik<br />
on 3 rd April, 21 st April, 28 th April, 17 th June, 23 rd June, 27 th July 2006, 7 th August and 25 th<br />
August 2006 respectively.<br />
Dr. S. D. Ramteke delivered lectures on 'Judicious use of growth regulators in grape' in seminars<br />
organised by different agencies at Jalna, Loni (Pravaranagar), Solapur, Junnar and Nasik on 2 nd<br />
April, 21 st April and 10 th May 2006 and 17 th June, 4 th September and 14 th September 2006<br />
respectively.<br />
Dr. R. G. Somkuwar visited grape vineyards at Niphad and delivered lecture on 'Cane development<br />
after back pruning in grape' in the seminar organized by SBI Project Uptech - <strong>Grapes</strong> at Niphad on<br />
7 th June 2006.<br />
| 32 |
Technology Assessed and Transferred<br />
Dr. S. D. Ramteke participated in group discussion on 'Bio- algeen S-90' organised by Pro-Agro Ltd.,<br />
Mumbai. <strong>for</strong> the growers at Nasik on 17 th May 2006.<br />
Dr. R. G. Somkuwar and Dr. J. Satisha delivered lecture on 'Role of canopy in production of export<br />
quality grapes' and 'Use of rootstocks in viticulture' respectively in the seminar organized under SBI<br />
Project Uptech - <strong>Grapes</strong> at Jath, Sangli on 17 th June 2006.<br />
The Director and all the scientists of the <strong>Centre</strong> participated in an Annual Seminar of Maharashtra<br />
State Grape Growers' Association at Pune on 25-26 th September 2006.<br />
Dr. S. D. Ramteke delivered lecture on 'Judicious use of growth regulators in grape' at Shrigonda<br />
organized by Agro won and grape growers association, Shrigonda on 3 rd October 2006.<br />
Dr. S. D. Ramteke delivered lecture on 'Judicious use of growth regulators in grape' on 12 th October<br />
2006 at Junnar organized by Abhinav Grape Growers Association.<br />
Dr. S. D. Ramteke delivered lecture on 'Use of bioregulators in grapes' on 15 th November 2006 at<br />
Osmanabad organized by Maharashtra State Grape Growers' Association.<br />
Participation in Field Day<br />
Dr. P. G. Adsule, Director, Dr. Indu. S. Sawant, Dr.<br />
S. D. Sawant, Dr. R.G. Somkuwar, Dr. A. K.<br />
Upadhyay, Dr. K. Banerjee, Dr. S. D. Ramteke, Dr.<br />
J. Sharma and Dr. N. S. Kulkarni attended and<br />
participated in the discussion in the 'Field Day'<br />
conducted at growers' vineyard near Manur, Tal.<br />
Kalvan, Dist. Nasik on 29 th November 2006. Mr.<br />
Ashok Gaikwad, President, Nasik Division of Maharashtra State Grape Growers' Association along<br />
with many directors was present on this occasion. About 150 growers from Kalvan and Satana<br />
participated in the Field Day. About 8 new chemicals / <strong>for</strong>mulations were tested at this site <strong>for</strong><br />
control of downy mildew. Demonstration of disease <strong>for</strong>ecasting system, software controlled<br />
automatic irrigation system and use of new efficient spraying system was also shown to the farmers.<br />
Farmers shared their experience in deliberations with scientists. Scientists clarified the doubts of<br />
growers related to water management, nutrition, insect and disease management, canopy<br />
management and use of growth regulators.<br />
Participation in exhibition<br />
Dr. R. G. Somkuwar participated in 4 th <strong>National</strong> Exhibition organized by Yashwant Krishi Audyogik<br />
and Pashu Paskhi from 24-28 th November 2006 at Karad, Distt. Sangli.<br />
In house discussions<br />
Approximately 800 farmers visited the <strong>Centre</strong> during this year to seek advise, consultancy <strong>for</strong> their<br />
problems being faced in the grape vineyard from the scientists of this <strong>Centre</strong> apart from collection<br />
of improved plant varieties / rootstocks.<br />
Video Programme<br />
Dr. P. G. Adsule, Dr. S. D. Sawant, Dr. R. G. Somkuwar, Dr. S. D. Ramteke and Dr. J. Sharma<br />
participated in the video conferencing telecasted to the grape growers of Sangli and Nasik from<br />
October 2006 to March 2007.<br />
| 33 |
Education and Training<br />
Visits Abroad<br />
Dr. A. K. Upadhyay and Dr. K. Banerjee were nominated to attend 120 th AOAC International<br />
Meeting of AOAC held at Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA during 17-22 nd September 2006 and<br />
presented a paper entitled 'Multi-residue screening of 100 pesticides in grapes by gas<br />
chromatography - mass spectrometry and liquid chromatography - tandem mass spectrometry. They<br />
also visited analytical R&D facility of the Dow, an organizational affiliate of the AOAC and had<br />
interaction with the working groups of the AOAC and allied organizations involved in residue<br />
analysis.<br />
Training Acquired<br />
Sl.<br />
Name<br />
No.<br />
I. Scientific staff<br />
Training Title Period Organized by<br />
1 Dr. G.S.<br />
Karibasappa<br />
2 Dr. Anuradha<br />
Upadhyay<br />
III. Administrative staff<br />
Launching ceremony and training<br />
on Plant Variety Registration'<br />
under the PPV & FRA 2001<br />
launched by Shri Sharad Pawar,<br />
Hon'ble Minister of Agriculture,<br />
CA, F & PD, Govt. of India<br />
Genetic Analyser<br />
20-21 st<br />
February 2007<br />
19-21 st<br />
February 2007<br />
NASC Complex, New<br />
Delhi.<br />
at Genomics and<br />
Proteomics facility of<br />
Labindia Pvt. Ltd. at<br />
Gurgaon<br />
3<br />
4<br />
Mr. A.<br />
Srinivasamurthy<br />
Mr. N. S. Pathan<br />
IT Sensitisation training<br />
programme <strong>for</strong> Finance Officers /<br />
Officials of Western Zone<br />
26-30 th June<br />
2006<br />
Central Institute of<br />
Fisheries Education,<br />
Mumbai<br />
5 Mr. A.<br />
Srinivasamurthy<br />
Critical Areas of Service Rules<br />
18-22 nd<br />
December 2006<br />
Prasam Institute of<br />
Statutory Rules, Bangalore<br />
6 Mr. N. S. Pathan 2006 Bangalore<br />
Training Given<br />
<strong>National</strong> fruit fly surveillance training programme<br />
Dr. P. G. Adsule, Director, Dr. S. D. Sawant and Dr. N. S. Kulkarni organized the <strong>National</strong> Fruit Fly<br />
Surveillance Training Programme at Navasari Agricultural University, Navasari, Gujarat during<br />
11-15 th April 2006.<br />
Advances in management of nutrients, pests and pesticide residues<br />
A training programme on "Advances in management of nutrients, pests and pesticide residues" was<br />
organised on 27 th July 2006, <strong>for</strong> field officers of a private sector company to upgrade their<br />
knowledge on latest in<strong>for</strong>mation in specified subjects of viticulture. Dr. Indu S. Sawant coordinated<br />
the training programme.<br />
| 34 |
Education and Training<br />
Production of export quality grapes<br />
A three day training programme was organized on "Production of export Quality grapes" from<br />
21-23 rd November 2006 to 21 officers and field staff of Field Fresh Foods Pvt. Ltd, Pune. The<br />
training programme included all aspects of viticulture like global grape scenario, varieties suitable <strong>for</strong><br />
export, use of rootstocks, water management, nutrient management, canopy management, use of<br />
growth regulators, disease management, insect pest management, pre and post harvest handling,<br />
monitoring pesticide residues etc. including filed demonstration. Dr. J. Satisha coordinated the<br />
training programme.<br />
Communicating skills <strong>for</strong> researchers<br />
A training programme on 'Communicating Skills <strong>for</strong> <strong>Research</strong>ers' was organised on 8 th February<br />
2007. Mr. Yateendra Joshi, Senior Fellow, World Institute of Sustainable Energy, Pune who has<br />
more than 15 years of progressive experience in science publishing and has an internationally<br />
acclaimed book 'Communicating in Style' was called as the resource person. Dr. Indu S. Sawant<br />
coordinated the programme.<br />
Summer training<br />
Name of<br />
scientists<br />
Dr. Indu S.<br />
Sawant<br />
Dr. S. D.<br />
Sawant<br />
Title of the training<br />
M.Sc. (Microbiology) dissertation<br />
titled "Effect of cultural conditions<br />
on growth and sporulation of<br />
Botryodiplodia theobromae"<br />
Monitoring wine fermentation and<br />
isolation, characterization and<br />
evaluation of yeast<br />
Duration<br />
No. of<br />
students<br />
Institution<br />
6 months One Yashwantrao Mohite College<br />
(Bharathi Vidyapeeth Deemed<br />
University), Pune<br />
6 months Two Yashwantrao Mohite College<br />
(Bharathi Vidyapeeth Deemed<br />
University), Pune<br />
Dr. Anuradha<br />
Upadhyay<br />
B.Sc. (Applied Biotechnology) 6 months Two Vidya Pratishthan's School of<br />
Biotechnology, Baramati<br />
Resource persons <strong>for</strong> miscellaneous training programmes<br />
• Scientists of the <strong>Centre</strong> delivered lectures in the discipline of their specialization during training<br />
programmes organized by Maharashtra State Grape Growers' Association in two batches of 15<br />
days each in June-July 2006 About 65 young farmers from Maharashtra were imparted training<br />
on various facets of viticulture.<br />
<br />
| 35 |
Awards and Recognitions<br />
Dr. P. G. Adsule, Director was awarded by the 'MRDBS<br />
Gauravchinh' during their Annual Seminar on 25 th<br />
September 2006 <strong>for</strong> this contribution in organizing the<br />
International Symposium on Grape Production and<br />
Processing at Baramati from 6-11 th February 2006.<br />
Dr. Indu S. Sawant was honoured by the Maharashtra<br />
State Grape Growers' Association during their Annual<br />
Seminar on 25 th September 2006 <strong>for</strong> her contribution in<br />
organising the International Symposium on Grape<br />
Production and Processing at Baramati from 6-11 th<br />
February 2006 as the Organising Secretary of the<br />
Symposium.<br />
Dr. J. Sharma, was honoured by the Maharashtra State<br />
Grape Growers' Association during their Annual Seminar<br />
on 25 th September 2006 by presenting 'MRDBS<br />
Gauravchinh' <strong>for</strong> his contribution in nutrient<br />
management of grapevine.<br />
Dr. R. G. Somkuwar received 'Abhinav Gaurav of the<br />
year 2006' from Abhinav Grape Growers' Association,<br />
Junnar <strong>for</strong> his contribution in viticulture.<br />
Linkages and Collaboration including<br />
Externally Funded Projects<br />
Collaborating and Externally Funded Projects<br />
i. Development of molecular markers linked to downy mildew resistance in grape. (Sub-project of<br />
ICAR Network project on 'Molecular Breeding').<br />
ii. Introduction, evaluation, multiplication and supply of grape varieties suitable <strong>for</strong> export (APEDA).<br />
iii.<br />
iv.<br />
<strong>National</strong> Referral Laboratory <strong>for</strong> Monitoring Pesticide Residues <strong>for</strong> Export of Fresh <strong>Grapes</strong> from<br />
India (APEDA).<br />
Use of Plastic covers in vineyards to improve export per cent of grapes (APEDA).<br />
| 36 |
Publications<br />
<strong>Research</strong> Articles<br />
1. Bhargava B. S., Kalbhor J. N., Deshmukh S. U. and Sharma J. 2006. Deteriorating ground<br />
water quality used <strong>for</strong> irrigating grapes. Indian Journal of Horticulture 63(3) : 235-239.<br />
2. Kulkarni N. S., Sawant Indu S. and Sawant S. D. 2006. Bio-efficacy of methomyl 40 SP on<br />
mealy bugs Maconellicoccus hirsutus in grapes and its compatibility with Verticillium lecanii<br />
and Trichoderma harzianum. Pestology. 30(10) : 49-52.<br />
3. Kulkarni N. S., Sawant Indu S., Sawant S. D. and Adsule P. G. 2007. Bio-efficacy of herbal<br />
extract derived from Nerium odorum and Bombax malabaricum (Praghat+) on mealy bugs<br />
(Maconellicoccus hirsutus) and its effect on shelf life of Trichoderma treated grapes. J. of Eco-<br />
Friendly Agriculture. 2(1) : 49-52.<br />
4. Ramteke S. D. and Somkuwar R. G. 2006. Effect of stage and concentration of GA 3 and<br />
Carbaryl on cluster compactness in Tas-A-Ganesh on 1613C rootstock. Journal of Maharashtra<br />
Agric. Univ., 31(2) : 237-238.<br />
5. Ramteke S. D., Somkuwar R. G. and Shikhamany S. D. 2006. Effect of stage and concentration<br />
of GA 3 and Carbaryl on cluster compactness in Tas-A-Ganesh on 1613 C rootstock. Mah. J.<br />
Agric. Uni. 31(3) : 364-365.<br />
6. Satisha J. and Prakash G. S. 2006. The influence of water and gas exchange parameters on<br />
grafted grapevines under conditions of moisture stress. South African Journal of Enology and<br />
Viticulture. 27(1) : 40-45.<br />
7. Satisha J., Prakash G. S. and Palaniappan R. 2006. Water use efficiency, specific leaf weight<br />
and mineral composition of grape varieties, rootstocks and budded vines under moisture stress<br />
conditions. Annals of Plant and Soil <strong>Research</strong>. 8(2) : 25-128.<br />
8. Satisha J., Shikhamany S. D. and Somkuwar R. G. 2006. A study on in situ grafting of Tas-A-<br />
Ganesh on different rootstocks. Maharashtra J. Agric. Univ., 31(2) : 223-225.<br />
9. Satisha J., Prakash G. S. and Venugopalan R. 2006. Statistical modelings of water use efficiency<br />
with physio-biochemical parameters of grape rootstocks, genotypes and budded grapevines<br />
under soil moisture stress conditions. Turkish J. Agriculture and Forestry, 30(4) : 261-271.<br />
10. Satisha J., Prakash G. S., Bhatt R.M and Sampath Kumar P. 2007. Physiological mechanisms<br />
of water use efficiency of grape rootstocks under moisture stress conditions. International<br />
Journal of Agricultural <strong>Research</strong>. 2(2) : 159-164.<br />
11. Satisha J., Prakash G. S., Murti G.S.R. and Upreti K.K. 2006. Response of grape rootstocks to<br />
soil moisture stress. Journal of Horticultural Sciences. 1(1) : 19-23.<br />
12. Satisha J., Shikhamany S. D., Somkuwar R. G. 2006. Studies on inverted bottleneck symptoms<br />
in grapevines raised on rootstocks. Indian Journal of Horticulture, 63(3) : 240-243.<br />
| 37 |
NRC <strong>for</strong> <strong>Grapes</strong> | Annual Report 2006-07<br />
13. Sharma J., Shikhamany S. D., Satisha J. and Raghupathi B. 2006. Diagnosis of nutrient<br />
imbalances in bunch stem necrosis affected Thompson Seedless grapes grafted on Dogridge<br />
rootstocks using DRIS. Indian Journal of Horticulture. 63(2) : 139-144.<br />
14. Somkuwar R. G. and Ramteke S. D. 2006. Evaluation of grape genotypes <strong>for</strong> shelf life. Ann.<br />
Plant Physiol. 19(2) : 133-136.<br />
15. Somkuwar R. G. and Ramteke S. D. 2006. Evaluation of grape varieties <strong>for</strong> yield and quality<br />
attributes. PKV Res. J. 30(1) : 23-24.<br />
16. Somkuwar R. G. and Ramteke S. D. 2006. Standardization of concentration and season <strong>for</strong><br />
maximum plantlets from grape rootstock. PKV Res. J. 30(1) : 111 - 112.<br />
17. Somkuwar R. G. and Ramteke S. D. 2006. Yield and quality in relation to different crop loads<br />
on Tas- A-Ganesh table grapes (Vitis vinifera L.) Journal of Plant Sciences. 1(2) : 176-181.<br />
18. Somkuwar R. G., Ramteke S. D. and Satisha J. 2006 Effect of Diameter on growth and success<br />
of Dogridge rootstock cuttings. Maharashtra J. Agric. Univ., 31(2) : 237-238.<br />
19. Somkuwar R. G., Satisha J. and Ramteke S. D. 2007. Standardization of propagation methods<br />
to raise grape vineyards on rootstock. Ad. Plant Sci. 20(1) : 107 - 109.<br />
20. Upadhyay Anuradha, Saboji Mamtha D., Reddy Suvarna, Deokar K. P. and Karibasappa G. S.<br />
2007. AFLP and SSR marker analysis of grape rootstocks in Indian grape germplasm. Scientia<br />
Horticulture. 112(2) : 176-183.<br />
21. Dhane, M.; Tamhnakar, S. A.; Patil, S. G.; Karibasappa, G. S. and Rao, V. S. 2006. Assessment<br />
of genetic diversity and relationship among some grape varieties using ISSR markers. Journal<br />
of applied Horticulture. 8(1) : 50-52.<br />
22. Nookaraju, A.; Barreto, M. S.; Karibasappa, G. S. and Agrawal, D. C. 2007. Synergetic effect<br />
of CPPU and benzyl adenine on embryo rescue in six stenospermocarpic cultivars of grape vine.<br />
Vitis. 46(4) : 188-199.<br />
23. Pakhale, S. S.; Karibasappa, G. S.; Asha, G. R.; Brij Bhushan and Sharma, A. 2007.<br />
Scavenging effect of Indian grape polyphenols on 2,2'-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical<br />
by electron spin resonance spectrometry. Indian Journal of Experimental Biology. 45(11) :<br />
968-974.<br />
Papers Presented at Symposia / Workshops / Meetings<br />
1. Banerjee K., Adsule P. G., Upadhyay A. K., Sawant S. D. and Kulkarni N. S. 2007. Multi-residue<br />
monitoring of pesticides in grapes. Lead paper presented in IIIrd <strong>National</strong> Symposium on 'Plant<br />
Protection in Horticulture: Emerging Trends and Challenges" March, 7-9 th 2007, Indian Institute<br />
of Horticultural <strong>Research</strong>, Bangalore.<br />
2. Jadhav Nutan T. and Sawant Indu S. 2007. Effect of cultural conditions on mycelial growth and<br />
pycnidia <strong>for</strong>mation by Botryodiplodia theobromae. In '<strong>National</strong> Symposium on Recent Trends<br />
in Life Sciences with Special Reference to Environmental Biotechnology & Biotechnology'<br />
February 10-12, 2007, Department of Zoology, Kusumtai Rajarambapu Patil Kanya<br />
Mahavidhalaya, Islampur, Sangli, MS.<br />
| 38 |
Publications<br />
3. Kulkarni N. S., Sawant Indu S. and Adsule P. G. 2006. Bio-efficacy of methomyl 40 SP on<br />
mealybugs, Maconellicoccus hirsutus in grapes and its compatibility with Verticillium lecanni<br />
and Trichoderma harzianum. In: <strong>National</strong> symposium on 'Improving Input Use Efficiency in<br />
Horticulture' organized by IIHR, Bangalore from 9-11 th August 2006. Abstr. No. 4.27: 195.<br />
4. Prakash G. S. and Satisha J. 2006. Enhancing water use efficiency through use of rootstocks.<br />
Paper presented in <strong>National</strong> Symposium on increasing the input use efficiency in horticultural<br />
crops (Lead Paper). Organized by IIHR, Bangalore from 9-11 th August 2006. pp: 10-11.<br />
5. Ramteke S. D., Satisha J. and Somkuwar R. G. 2006. Enhancing the bioefficacy of GA 3 by use<br />
of different adjuvant in Thompson Seedless grapes. In: <strong>National</strong> symposium on 'Improving Input<br />
Use Efficiency in Horticulture' organized by IIHR, Bangalore from 9-11 th August 2006. pp. 167.<br />
6. Sawant Indu S. and Sawant S. D. 2007. Association of Botryodiplodia theobromae with<br />
grapevines in India. In. III rd <strong>National</strong> Symposium on 'Plant Protection in Horticulture: Emerging<br />
Trends and Challenges" March, 7-9 th 2007, Indian Institute of Horticultural <strong>Research</strong>, Bangalore.<br />
OP-5, p3.<br />
7. Sawant S. D. and Sawant Indu S. 2007. Good Agricultural Practices and Integrated Disease<br />
Management in <strong>Grapes</strong>. <strong>National</strong> Seminar on "Recent Advances in Production, Protection and<br />
Post Harvest Management of Grape, Mandarin and Arid Fruits" at JNKVV - College of<br />
Horticulture, Mandsaur, MP,17-18 th , March 2007.<br />
8. Sawant S. D., Sawant Indu S. and Adsule P. G. 2007. Use of mineral oil <strong>for</strong>mulation <strong>for</strong> the<br />
control of powdery mildew in grapes. In. III <strong>National</strong> Symposium on 'Plant Protection in<br />
Horticulture: Emerging Trends and Challenges" March, 7-9 th 2007, Indian Institute of<br />
Horticultural <strong>Research</strong>, Bangalore. OP-4, p2-3.<br />
9. Sawant S. D., Sawant Indu S. and Kulkarni N. S. 2006. Improvement of efficiency of pesticides<br />
in grapes with addition of a non-ionic surfactant containing polyether polymethylsiloxane<br />
copolymer. In: <strong>National</strong> symposium on 'Improving Input Use Efficiency in Horticulture' organized<br />
by IIHR, Bangalore from 9-11 th August 2006. Abstr. No. 4.34: 200.<br />
10. Sharma J. 2006. Importance of tissue analysis and soil testing in horticultural crops. Paper<br />
presented In: Workshop on 'Enhancement of soil productivity' Organised by Maharshtra State<br />
Agriculture Department, Pune on 20-21-11-2006. Souvenir pp:147-155.<br />
11. Upadhyay A. K., Sharma J., Shikhamany S. D. and Singh R. K. 2006. Effect of mulch and antitranspirant<br />
on yield and water use efficiency in Tas-A-Ganesh (Vitis vinifera L.) vines grafted on<br />
Dogridge rootstock. In: <strong>National</strong> symposium on 'Improving Input Use Efficiency in Horticulture'<br />
organized by IIHR, Bangalore from 9-11 th August 2006. pp. 115.<br />
12. Upadhyay A. K., Sharma J., Shikhamany S. D. and Singh R. K.. 2006. Effect of irrigation levels<br />
on yield and water use efficiency of grafted and ungrafted surface drip irrigated Tas-A-Ganesh<br />
(Vitis vinifera L.). In: <strong>National</strong> symposium on 'Improving Input Use Efficiency in Horticulture'<br />
organized by IIHR, Bangalore from 9-11 th August 2006. pp. 115-116.<br />
| 39 |
NRC <strong>for</strong> <strong>Grapes</strong> | Annual Report 2006-07<br />
Technical Bulletins<br />
1. Somkuwar R. G., Satisha J., Taware P. B. and Adsule P. G. 2006. Raising grapes on rootstocks<br />
(in Marathi). Technical Bulletin No. 6, NRC <strong>for</strong> <strong>Grapes</strong>, Pune. Pp: 23 (2 nd Edition)<br />
Extension Bulletin<br />
1. Sawant S. D., Sawant Indu S., Kulkarni N. S. and Mani M. 2006. Disease and insect pest<br />
management in grapes in two pruning and one cropping system. Extension Bulletin No. 1<br />
Technical Folders<br />
1. Somkuwar R. G., Upadhyay A. K., Adsule P. G. and Taware P. B. (August 2006). Vineyard<br />
establishment - A guide to cultural practices. Folder No. 5.<br />
2. Somkuwar R. G. (August, 2006). Initial Care and maintenance of grafted vines up to cane<br />
development. Folder No. 6.<br />
3. Somkuwar R. G. (August, 2006). Role of canopy in production of exportable quality grapes -<br />
Do's and Don'ts. Folder No. 7.<br />
4. Somkuwar R. G., Ramteke, S. D. Sharma J., Upadhyay A. K., Sawant S. D., Kulkarni N. S.,<br />
Adsule P. G. and Taware P. B. 2007. Some tips on Forward Pruning. Folder No. 8.<br />
5. Somkuwar R. G. and Ramteke, S. D. 2007. Bunch Development through Canopy Management<br />
and Growth Regulators. Folder No. 9.<br />
Other Publications<br />
1. Adsule P. G., Upadhyay Anuradha, Sawant Indu S., Somkuwar R. G. Sharma, J. and Ramteke<br />
S. D. 2006. Annual Report 2005-06. <strong>National</strong> <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Centre</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Grapes</strong>, Pune.<br />
2. Adsule P. G., Upadhyay Anuradha, Sawant Indu S. and Satisha J., 2006. Vision 2025. <strong>National</strong><br />
<strong>Research</strong> <strong>Centre</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Grapes</strong>, Pune.<br />
3. Adsule P. G., Satisha J., Upadhyay Anuradha and Sawant Indu S. 2007. EFC Document <strong>for</strong> XI<br />
Plan, NRC <strong>for</strong> <strong>Grapes</strong>, Pune.<br />
Video CD<br />
1. ‘<strong>National</strong> <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Centre</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Grapes</strong> - First decade in the Service of Indian Grape Industry’<br />
Video Film (20 minutes) depicting the activities and resources of the <strong>Centre</strong>. <strong>National</strong> <strong>Research</strong><br />
<strong>Centre</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Grapes</strong>, Pune.<br />
<br />
| 40 |
Meetings of QRT, RAC, IMC, SRC with<br />
Significant Decisions<br />
<strong>Research</strong> Advisory Committee (RAC) Meeting<br />
Following are the members of RAC :<br />
1. Dr. G. L. Kaul, Ex VC, Assam Agricultural University, Jorhat - Chairman<br />
2. Dr. R. M. Pandey, Ex-Director, IIHR, Bangalore - Member<br />
3. Dr. Y. R. Sarma, Ex-Director, IISR, Calicut - Member<br />
4. Dr. R. P. Srivastava, Ex-Principal Scientist, CISH, Lucknow - Member<br />
5. Dr. S. N. Sharma, Prof. & Head, Department of Agronomy, - Member<br />
BHU, Varanasi<br />
6. Dr. S. N. Pandey, Asstt. Director General (Hort.), ICAR, New Delhi - Member<br />
7. Mr. Mahendra Shahir, President, MRDBS, Solapur Unit (IMC Member) - Member<br />
8. Mr. Balasaheb Gawade, Grape Grower, Baramati, Pune (IMC Member) - Member<br />
9. Dr. P. G. Adsule, Director, NRC <strong>for</strong> <strong>Grapes</strong>, Pune - Member<br />
10. Dr. G. S. Karibasappa Sr. Scientist, NRC <strong>for</strong> <strong>Grapes</strong>, Pune - Member Secretary<br />
The Eighth meeting of the <strong>Research</strong> Advisory Committee, of the <strong>Centre</strong> was held on 19-20 th July<br />
2006. Dr. G. L. Kaul, Ex VC, Assam Agricultural University, Jorhat chaired the meeting. The other<br />
members of the committee were Dr. S. N. Pandey, ADG (hort.), Dr. Y. R. Sarma, Ex-Director, IISR,<br />
Calicut; Dr. R. M. Pandey, Ex-Director, IIHR, Bangalore; Dr. R. P. Srivastava Ex-Principal Scientist,<br />
CISH, Lucknow; Dr. S. N. Sharma; Prof. & Head, Department of Agronomy, BHU, Varanasi and<br />
Mr. Mahendra Shahir, President, MRDBS, Solapur Unit (IMC Member). All the scientists of the<br />
<strong>Centre</strong> participated in the meeting. During the meeting, action taken report on last RAC and<br />
progress report of ongoing projects was presented. During the meeting, project were reclassified into<br />
programme mode. The committee also suggested that the researchable issues which had emerged<br />
during the deliberations in the International Symposium on Grape Production and Processing should<br />
be noted <strong>for</strong> future guidance.<br />
The Ninth meeting of the <strong>Research</strong> Advisory Committee, of the <strong>Centre</strong> was convened on 23-24 th<br />
March 2007. Dr. G. L. Kaul, Ex Vice-Chancellor, Assam Agricultural University, Jorhat chaired the<br />
meeting. The other members of the committee who attended were Dr. R. M. Pandey, Ex-Director,<br />
IIHR, Bangalore; Dr. R. P. Srivastava Ex-Principal Scientist, CISH, Lucknow; Dr. S. N. Sharma; Prof.<br />
& Head, Department of Agronomy, BHU, Varanasi and Mr. Mahendra Shahir, Vice-President,<br />
Maharashtra State Grape Growers' Association, Pune (IMC Member). Dr. J.M. Khilari, President,<br />
Maharashtra State Grape Growers' Association also participated in the concluding session of the<br />
meeting. All the scientists of the <strong>Centre</strong> participated in the meeting. During the meeting, action taken<br />
report on last RAC and progress report of ongoing projects was reviewed by the Committee and<br />
suggestions were offered <strong>for</strong> further improvement.<br />
| 41 |
NRC <strong>for</strong> <strong>Grapes</strong> | Annual Report 2006-07<br />
Institute Management Committee (IMC) Meeting<br />
Following are the members of IMC<br />
1. Dr. P. G. Adsule, Director NRC <strong>Grapes</strong>, Pune - Chairman<br />
2. Dr. M. Mani, Principal Scientist, NRC <strong>Grapes</strong>, Pune - Member<br />
3. Dr. V. S. R. K. Prasad, Principal Scientist, NRC <strong>for</strong> O & G, Rajgurunagar - Member<br />
4. Dr. Indu S. Sawant, Sr. Scientist, NRC <strong>Grapes</strong>, Pune - Member<br />
5. Dr. Pious Thomas, Sr. Scientist, IIHR, Bangalore - Member<br />
6. Mr. O. Babu, AAO, NRC <strong>Grapes</strong>, Pune - Member Secretary<br />
The 21 st and 22 nd meetings of Institute Management Committee of the <strong>Centre</strong> were held on 6 th July<br />
2006 and 20 th February 2007 respectively, under the Chairmanship of Dr. P. G. Adsule, Director.<br />
Institute <strong>Research</strong> Committee (IRC) Meeting<br />
The 11 th meeting of Institute <strong>Research</strong> Committee of the <strong>Centre</strong> was held on 28-29 th September<br />
2006 under the Chairmanship of Dr. P. G. Adsule, Director.<br />
First Advisory Committee meeting of APEDA-NRL on 4 th August 2006<br />
An advisory committee was constituted under the<br />
Chairmanship of Dr. C. D. Mayee, Chairman, ASRB to<br />
monitor the progress and achievements of the Pesticide<br />
Residue Monitoring Plan (RMP) of the <strong>National</strong> Referral<br />
Laboratory (NRL) since its inception from 2003 under<br />
the APEDA Act. A meeting was held at NRC <strong>Grapes</strong>,<br />
Pune on 4 th August 2006. The following members<br />
attended the meeting.<br />
1. Dr. A. G. Sawant, Ex-Member, ASRB, New Delhi<br />
2. Dr. S. P. Ghosh, Former DDG (Hort.), ICAR, New Delhi<br />
3. Dr. (Mrs.) Prem Dureja, Head, Division of Agril. Chemicals, IARI, New Delhi<br />
4. Shri Sopan Kanchan, Chairman, GGFI, Pune<br />
5. Dr. A. U. Ekbote, Former Dy. Director (Lab.), Govt. of Maharashtra<br />
6. Dr. Kaushik Banerjee, Sr. Scientist, NRC <strong>Grapes</strong>, Pune<br />
7. Dr. A. K. Upadhyay, Sr. Scientist, NRC <strong>Grapes</strong>, Pune<br />
8. Dr. P. G. Adsule, Director, NRC <strong>Grapes</strong>, Pune - Project Coordinator of the NRL in Maharashtra<br />
The meeting deliberated the progress and achievements made under the pesticide residue-monitoring<br />
plan in last three grape seasons i.e. 2003-04, 2004-05 and 2005-06 on 4 th August 2006 and made<br />
visit to one of the nominated laboratories under this programme in Pune city on 5 th August 2006.<br />
The committee made several recommendations regarding plot size, sampling and proficiency tests,<br />
which will be followed in coming season. Few of these have been worked out during this year and<br />
also implemented in the ongoing programme.<br />
<br />
| 42 |
Consultancy, Patents and<br />
Commercialization of Technology<br />
During the year, 25 new contract research projects, 14 consultancy programmes and 2 training<br />
programmes were approved.<br />
A first of its kind consultancy programme of advising the grape growers producing exportable grapes<br />
on general and specific current problems by scientists from NRC <strong>for</strong> <strong>Grapes</strong>, through video<br />
conferencing mode was developed by the Institute in consultation with all the parties concerned, and<br />
executed through a MoU. The sponsorer was M/s Field Fresh, a company engaged in export of<br />
grapes mainly from Nasik and Sangli region.<br />
Copyrights <strong>for</strong> two softwares developed by the scientists of the <strong>Centre</strong> were obtained<br />
1. Copyright Registration No. SW-3313/2006, dated 29/12/2006 on the work 'Grape<br />
Germplasm In<strong>for</strong>mation System'<br />
2. Copyright Registration No. SW-3312/2006, dated 29/12/2006 on the work 'NRCG-SKAI<br />
PMExpert, software <strong>for</strong> management of powdery mildew in Indian vineyards'<br />
Approved On-going Institute Projects<br />
The programme mode research is conducted under the following broad programmes<br />
1. Management of genetic resources of table, wine, raisin, juice and rootstock grape varieties<br />
2. Germplasm utilization and genetic enhancement<br />
3. Application of biotechnological research in grapes<br />
4. Development of propagation and nursery technology<br />
5. Use of rootstocks <strong>for</strong> grape cultivation<br />
6. Horticultural practices <strong>for</strong> quality and yield in table and wine grapes<br />
7. Nutrient and soil management in grapes<br />
8. Water management in grapes<br />
9. Grape physiology including use of bioregulators<br />
10. Studies on viticulturally important microorganisms<br />
11. Integrated disease management in grapes<br />
12. Integrated insect and mite pest management in grapes<br />
13. Management of agrochemical residues and environmental contaminants in grapes<br />
14. Development of post-harvest technologies<br />
15. Development of in<strong>for</strong>mation and documentation systems<br />
<br />
| 43 |
Participation of Scientists in Conference,<br />
Meetings, Workshops, Seminars, Symposia etc.<br />
Seminars / Symposia / Conferences<br />
Name of the<br />
scientist<br />
Seminars / Symposia /<br />
Conferences<br />
Duration<br />
Organized by and<br />
place<br />
Dr. N. S. Kulkarni<br />
<strong>National</strong> Symposium on Biological<br />
Control of Sucking Pests<br />
26-27 th May<br />
2006<br />
Project Directorate of<br />
Biological Control at<br />
Bangalore<br />
Dr. S. D. Sawant<br />
Dr A. K. Upadhyay<br />
Dr. S. D. Ramteke<br />
Improving Input Use Efficiency in<br />
Horticulture<br />
9-11 th August<br />
2006<br />
Indian Institute of<br />
Horticultural <strong>Research</strong>,<br />
Bangalore<br />
Dr. N.S. Kulkarni<br />
Dr. R. G. Somkuwar<br />
Advantages of grafted rootstocks<br />
<strong>for</strong> wine grape cultivation<br />
17 th August<br />
2006<br />
Mildura Vine Nursery Pvt.<br />
Ltd., Australia at Nasik<br />
Dr. S. D. Ramteke<br />
Food safety and grape success<br />
story<br />
3 rd November<br />
2006<br />
Bombay exhibition held at<br />
Goregaon East<br />
Dr. Indu S. Sawant<br />
III rd <strong>National</strong> Symposium on 'Plant<br />
Protection in Horticulture:<br />
Emerging Trends and Challenges'<br />
7-9 th March<br />
2007<br />
Indian Institute of<br />
Horticultural <strong>Research</strong>,<br />
Bangalore<br />
Workshops / Meetings<br />
Name of the<br />
scientist<br />
Seminars / Symposia /<br />
Conferences<br />
Duration<br />
Organized by and<br />
place<br />
Dr. Anuradha<br />
Upadhyay, Public<br />
In<strong>for</strong>mation Officer<br />
Right to In<strong>for</strong>mation Act- 2005<br />
18-19 th April<br />
2006<br />
<strong>National</strong> Academy of<br />
Agricultural <strong>Research</strong><br />
Management, Hyderabad<br />
Dr. Anuradha<br />
Upadhyay<br />
Association genetics- application<br />
and prospects in horticultural<br />
crops<br />
21-22 nd April<br />
2006.<br />
CPCRI, Kasargod<br />
Dr. J. Satisha,<br />
Assistant Public<br />
In<strong>for</strong>mation Officer<br />
Right to in<strong>for</strong>mation act- 2005<br />
25-26 th April<br />
2006<br />
<strong>National</strong> Academy of<br />
Agricultural <strong>Research</strong><br />
Management, Hyderabad<br />
Dr. K. Banerjee<br />
Dr. S. D. Ramteke<br />
Group Discussion on "Bio-algeen<br />
S-90" arranged <strong>for</strong> the growers<br />
17 th May 2006 Pro- Agro Ltd Mumbai at<br />
Nasik<br />
Dr. P. G. Adsule<br />
Dr. R. G. Somkuwar<br />
First meeting of Mega Seed<br />
Project and presented project on<br />
'Production of quality grape<br />
planting material'<br />
27-28 th June<br />
2006<br />
Directorate of Seed<br />
<strong>Research</strong>, New Delhi<br />
Dr. P. G. Adsule<br />
Dr. Indu S. Sawant<br />
Dr. J. Satisha<br />
Meeting on 'Quarantine issues <strong>for</strong><br />
importing plant material'<br />
26 th July 2006 Agro processing and<br />
Agribusiness,<br />
Commissionerate of<br />
Agriculture, Shivajinagar,<br />
Pune.<br />
| 44 |
Participation of Scientists in Conference, Meetings, Workshops, Seminars, Symposia etc.<br />
Name of the<br />
scientist<br />
Seminars / Symposia /<br />
Conferences<br />
Duration<br />
Organized by and<br />
place<br />
Dr. Anuradha<br />
Upadhyay<br />
Review meeting of Network<br />
project on Molecular breeding and<br />
presented the progress report of<br />
the subproject on grape.<br />
18 th August<br />
2006<br />
NBPGR, New Delhi<br />
Dr. G. S. Karibasappa<br />
Dr J. Satisha<br />
Sensitisation workshop on NAIP<br />
19 th August<br />
2006<br />
Central Institute of Fisheries<br />
Education, Mumbai<br />
Dr. P. G. Adsule<br />
Presentation of the draft report by<br />
MITCON <strong>for</strong> the <strong>for</strong>mation of<br />
Indian Grape and Wine Board<br />
16 th September<br />
2006<br />
Organized by MITCON at<br />
Mumbai<br />
Dr. Anuradha<br />
Upadhyay<br />
Dr. J. Satisha<br />
Discussion meeting with Dr. Minal<br />
Mhatre of Bhabha Atomic<br />
<strong>Research</strong> <strong>Centre</strong> to <strong>for</strong>mulate<br />
collaborative research project<br />
12 th October<br />
2006<br />
Nuclear and Agriculture<br />
Biotechnology Division,<br />
Bhabha Atomic <strong>Research</strong><br />
<strong>Centre</strong>, Mumbai<br />
Dr. Indu S. Sawant<br />
Dr. S. D. Sawant<br />
Brain storming session chaired by<br />
Dr. G. Kalloo, Ex. DDG (Hort. &<br />
CS) <strong>for</strong> <strong>for</strong>mulating an effective<br />
network project <strong>for</strong> the<br />
management of diseases and<br />
insect pests of onion and garlic<br />
16 th January<br />
2007<br />
NRC <strong>for</strong> Onion and Garlic<br />
at Rajgurunagar, Pune<br />
Dr. P. G. Adsule<br />
Dr. Indu S. Sawant<br />
Dr. S. D. Sawant<br />
Meeting to chalk out effective<br />
strategies to curtail the effect of<br />
diseases and pests in pomegranate<br />
and grapes.<br />
20 th January<br />
2007<br />
Department of Agriculture<br />
Sugae Complex, Pune<br />
Dr. N. S. Kulkarni<br />
Dr. P. G. Adsule<br />
Dr. M. Mani<br />
Dr. G. S. Karibasappa<br />
Dr. Indu S. Sawant<br />
One day interactive workshop<br />
presided over by Dr. H.P. Singh,<br />
Dy. Director General (Hort), ICAR<br />
to chalk out effective strategies to<br />
manage the effect of diseases and<br />
pests in pomegranate and grapes.<br />
24 th February<br />
2007<br />
Vaikunth Mehta <strong>National</strong><br />
Institute of Cooperative<br />
Management, Pune<br />
Dr. S. D. Sawant<br />
Dr. S. D. Ramteke<br />
Dr. N. S. Kulkarni<br />
<br />
| 45 |
Distinguished Visitors<br />
Dr. Mangala Rai, Secretary, DARE and Director General, ICAR along with Dr. R. B. Deshmukh, Vice<br />
Chancellor, MPKV, Rahuri visited the <strong>Centre</strong> on 21 st January, 2007. On the occasion a video film<br />
"<strong>National</strong> <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Centre</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Grapes</strong>: First Decade in the service of Indian Grape Industry" was<br />
released.<br />
A delegation comprising of Shri S. M. Desalfine, Additional Secretary (Agriculture), Ministry of<br />
Agriculture, Shri S. K. Pattnaik, Joint Secretary and Director, <strong>National</strong> Horticulture Mission, Govt.<br />
of India, New Delhi along with Shri V. D. Patil, Horticulture Commissioner, Govt. of Maharashtra<br />
visited the <strong>Centre</strong> on 22 nd September 2006.<br />
S. No. Name with Designation Organization Date<br />
1 Dr. A. K. Srivastava, Head, Plant Protection VPKAS, Almora 01/07/2006<br />
2 Mr. Pepmeres Lauviol & Tourette ERAI 04/10/2006<br />
3 Dr. J. C. Baskhi, Ex. Vice Chancellor RAU, Bikaner 09/03/2007<br />
4 Prof. K. V. Peter, Ex. Vice Chancellor KAU, Vellanikara, Thrissur 13/03/2007<br />
<strong>Research</strong> and Management Personnel<br />
1. Dr. P. G. Adsule, Director<br />
Infrastructure Development<br />
Laboratory<br />
Automatic Genetic Analyser, Microprocessor controlled BOD incubator were procured during the<br />
year.<br />
Library<br />
During the year 400 new accessions were added to the library.<br />
New Structures<br />
1. Biological Control Laboratory<br />
2. Exhibition Hall<br />
3. Farm Office<br />
| 46 |
Other Activities<br />
Celebrations<br />
qhXr [Idm∂S>>m Am°a qhXr H$m`©embm<br />
H{$›– _| 14 g{ 30 ogVÂ]a VH$ qhXr [Idm∂S>>m _Zm`m J`m $& H$m`©H´$_ H$m ew^ma‰_ S>m∞. [r. Or. AS>gwb{, oZX{eH$ Z{<br />
oH$`m & Bg Xm°amZ odo^fi ‡oV`m{oJVmAm| H$m Am`m{OZ oH$`m J`m $oOZ_| g^r AoYH$mna`m| Am°a H$_©Mmna`m| Z{ CÀgmh<br />
[yd©H$ ^mJ ob`m $& ‡ÌZm{Œmar, H$odVm[mR> Edß dmX oddmX ‡oV`m{oJVm _wª` AmH$f©U ah{ $& H$m`©H´$_ H{$ g_m[Z oXdg<br />
[a lr. Ama. [r. d_m©, ghm`H$ oZX{eH$, qhXr oejU `m{OZm, [wU{ _wª` AoVWr W{$& Cgr oXZ qhXr H$m`©embm H$m ^r<br />
Am`m{OZ oH$`m J`m$& oOg_| lr. Ama. [r. d_m© Z{ qhXr amO^mfm oZ`_mdbr Edß qhXr ‡`m{J H{$ obE odo^fi [waÒH$mam|<br />
g{ AdJV H$am`m, VWm gaH$mar H$m_H$mO _| AoYH$moYH$ qhXr H{$ ‡`m{J H{$ obE AmdÌ`H$ OmZH$mar Xr$&<br />
Institute Day<br />
The <strong>Centre</strong> celebrated its 10 th Institute Day on 18 th January 2007. All the staff participated in the<br />
fun games and Antakshari organized on this event. The celebration ended with the prize distribution<br />
and address by Dr. P. G. Adsule, Director of the institute.<br />
Republic Day<br />
The <strong>Centre</strong> celebrated Republic Day on 26 th January with joy and splendour. Dr. P. G. Adsule,<br />
Director, hoisted the flag. In his address, he called upon the staff to work towards betterment of the<br />
society in general and farming community in particular.<br />
Inauguration<br />
The newly constructed structures Biocontrol Laboratory,<br />
Farm Office building and Museum were inaugurated by<br />
Dr. C. D. Mayee, Chairman, ASRB, Dr. S. P. Ghosh,<br />
Former DDG (Hort.), ICAR, Dr. A. G. Sawant, Ex-<br />
Member, ASRB respectively on 4 th August 2006.<br />
Independence Day<br />
Dr. P. G. Adsule, Director hoisted the national flag on the occasion of Independence Day on 15 th<br />
August 2006. In his address, he urged all the staff of the <strong>Centre</strong> to work hard <strong>for</strong> upliftment of the<br />
farmers. During The children of the staff members who obtained first class or distinction in S.S.C.<br />
or H.S.C. examination were felicitated by offering cash prizes on this occasion.<br />
Vigilance Week<br />
Vigilance Week was observed from 6-11 th November 2006 with the address by the Director to the<br />
staff on the first day.<br />
Institute Committees<br />
To look after the various activities of the <strong>Centre</strong>, <strong>Research</strong> Management & Coordination Unit,<br />
Technical Cell, Publication Committee, Store Purchase Committee, Farm Management Committee,<br />
Library, Works, Photography, Sports activities, ARIS Cell, IRGS and Official Language<br />
Implementation Committeethe were in operation.<br />
| 47 |
Meteorological Data<br />
Year<br />
&<br />
Month<br />
Air temperature<br />
(°C)<br />
Relative Humidity<br />
(%)<br />
Min. Max. Min. Max.<br />
Pan<br />
evaporation<br />
(mm)<br />
Sunshine<br />
duration<br />
(hr.)<br />
Total<br />
rainfall<br />
(mm)<br />
No. of<br />
rainy<br />
days<br />
No. of rainy<br />
days with ><br />
4 mm rain*<br />
Apr 2006 17.18 38.19 19.63 90.27 6.93 10.58 2.40 8 0<br />
May 2006 22.65 37.29 31.90 83.97 6.75 12.20 100.40 7 2<br />
Jun 2006 21.83 32.62 62.53 99.80 2.78 11.78 114.40 17 5<br />
Jul 2006 21.85 28.42 84.00 99.97 1.32 11.63 150.60 28 11<br />
Aug 2006 21.16 28.22 83.94 100.00 0.74 11.27 205.00 28 10<br />
Sep 2006 20.80 31.27 68.87 100.00 1.58 10.92 164.00 18 7<br />
Oct 2006 19.04 31.49 51.94 99.97 2.48 10.87 56.00 7 5<br />
Nov 2006 16.19 29.77 55.17 100.00 2.28 10.33 17.00 16 2<br />
Dec 2006 9.82 30.61 40.77 100.00 2.83 9.89 1.20 5 0<br />
Jan 2007 9.98 31.94 36.00 99.94 3.19 9.40 0.40 2 0<br />
Feb 2007 11.25 33.36 28.18 99.25 4.26 10.18 0.60 2 0<br />
Mar 2007 13.65 36.90 20.87 91.35 5.11 10.81 1.00 3 0<br />
* Days with > 4 mm rainfall does not require irrigation<br />
Source : Weather station, NRC <strong>for</strong> <strong>Grapes</strong>, Pune<br />
| 48 |