26.12.2014 Views

Recreation, Parks and Culture Master Plan - Town of Ajax

Recreation, Parks and Culture Master Plan - Town of Ajax

Recreation, Parks and Culture Master Plan - Town of Ajax

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Town</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Ajax</strong><br />

RECREATION, PARKS & CULTURE MASTER PLAN<br />

April 2008<br />

Prepared by the <strong>Town</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Ajax</strong> <strong>Recreation</strong> Services Department with the assistance <strong>of</strong>:<br />

mbpc<br />

Monteith Brown<br />

planning consultants<br />

in<br />

association<br />

with<br />

Tucker-Reid &<br />

Associates


Acknowledgements<br />

Acknowledgements<br />

The <strong>Recreation</strong>, <strong>Parks</strong> & <strong>Culture</strong> <strong>Master</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> is a product <strong>of</strong> hard work <strong>and</strong> dedication contributed by a number <strong>of</strong> individuals. The Technical<br />

Committee, General Government Committee, Management Committee, <strong>Town</strong> Council, <strong>Town</strong> Staff <strong>and</strong> the Project Consultants have worked<br />

extensively on this endeavour. A special thank you is reserved for the numerous stakeholders, community organizations <strong>and</strong> members <strong>of</strong> the<br />

general public who provided feedback throughout the planning process.<br />

Through these collective efforts, we trust that the <strong>Recreation</strong>, <strong>Parks</strong> & <strong>Culture</strong> <strong>Master</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> is responsive <strong>and</strong> reflective <strong>of</strong> the needs <strong>of</strong> those<br />

residing in <strong>Ajax</strong>. The actions arising from the <strong>Master</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> are aimed at improving our quality <strong>of</strong> life <strong>and</strong> it is hoped that they will guide the<br />

<strong>Town</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Ajax</strong> <strong>and</strong> its community partners in delivering high quality recreation <strong>and</strong> cultural services for years to come.<br />

<strong>Master</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> Technical Committee<br />

<strong>Town</strong> Council<br />

Linda Cork, Manager <strong>of</strong> Neighbourhood Programs & Active Living<br />

Mayor Steve Parish<br />

(Project Manager)<br />

Joanne Dies, Councillor Ward 3 Scott A. Crawford, Regional Councillor Wards 1 & 2<br />

Howie Dayton, Director <strong>of</strong> <strong>Recreation</strong> Services Colleen Jordan, Regional Councillor Wards 3 & 4<br />

Dave Meredith, Director <strong>of</strong> Operations & Environmental Services Shaun Collier, Councillor Ward 1<br />

Paul Allore, Director <strong>of</strong> <strong>Plan</strong>ning & Development Services Renrick Ashby, Councillor Ward 2<br />

Rob Braid, Area Manager ‐ Facilities Joanne Dies, Councillor Ward 3<br />

Gary Muller, Manager <strong>of</strong> <strong>Plan</strong>ning Pat Brown, Councillor Ward 4<br />

Tim Murphy, <strong>Parks</strong> Coordinator<br />

Christie McLardie, Communications Manager<br />

Marilou Murray, Assistant to the CAO<br />

Andrew Jackson, L<strong>and</strong>scape Architect<br />

Project Consultants<br />

MONTEITH BROWN PLANNING CONSULTANTS<br />

Tucker‐Reid & Associates<br />

The JF Group<br />

MONTEITH BROWN PLANNING CONSULTANTS in association with Tucker‐Reid & Associates & The JF Group<br />

April 2008


Table <strong>of</strong> Contents<br />

Table <strong>of</strong> Contents<br />

Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................................................................................... iii<br />

Chapter 1: Strategic Direction ......................................................................................................................................................................... 1<br />

1.1 Purpose <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Master</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> ............................................................................................................................................................. 1<br />

1.2 Supporting Documents ................................................................................................................................................................... 1<br />

1.3 Definition <strong>of</strong> <strong>Recreation</strong> & <strong>Culture</strong> .................................................................................................................................................. 1<br />

1.4 <strong>Master</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> Process........................................................................................................................................................................ 2<br />

1.5 <strong>Master</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> Goals ........................................................................................................................................................................... 3<br />

1.6 <strong>Master</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> Objectives ................................................................................................................................................................... 4<br />

Chapter 2: <strong>Master</strong> <strong>Plan</strong>ning Context ............................................................................................................................................................... 9<br />

2.1 The <strong>Town</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Ajax</strong> ............................................................................................................................................................................ 9<br />

2.2 The Community Consultation Program .......................................................................................................................................... 10<br />

2.3 Community Demographics ............................................................................................................................................................ 13<br />

2.4 Trends in <strong>Recreation</strong>, <strong>Parks</strong> & <strong>Culture</strong> ........................................................................................................................................... 14<br />

Chapter 3: <strong>Recreation</strong>, <strong>Parks</strong> & <strong>Culture</strong> Facilities .......................................................................................................................................... 17<br />

3.1 Methodology ................................................................................................................................................................................ 17<br />

3.2 Indoor <strong>Recreation</strong> Facilities ........................................................................................................................................................... 19<br />

3.3 Arts, <strong>Culture</strong> & Heritage ................................................................................................................................................................ 27<br />

3.4 Outdoor <strong>Recreation</strong> Facilities ........................................................................................................................................................ 31<br />

3.5 Parkl<strong>and</strong> Needs ............................................................................................................................................................................. 42<br />

3.6 Natural Environment L<strong>and</strong>s ........................................................................................................................................................... 47<br />

Chapter 4: Service Delivery ........................................................................................................................................................................... 49<br />

4.1 Vision Statement .......................................................................................................................................................................... 49<br />

4.2 Mission Statement – <strong>Recreation</strong> Services ...................................................................................................................................... 49<br />

4.3 Service Rationalization & Priorities ................................................................................................................................................ 49<br />

4.4 Partnerships in Delivering Services ................................................................................................................................................ 51<br />

4.5 Operational Impacts <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Master</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> ........................................................................................................................................ 54<br />

Chapter 5: Implementation ........................................................................................................................................................................... 55<br />

5.1 Monitoring ................................................................................................................................................................................... 55<br />

5.2 Implementation Schedule ............................................................................................................................................................. 55<br />

5.3 Capital Costing & Phasing <strong>of</strong> Selected Actions ............................................................................................................................... 73<br />

MONTEITH BROWN PLANNING CONSULTANTS in association with Tucker‐Reid & Associates & The JF Group<br />

April 2008<br />

Page i


Table <strong>of</strong> Contents<br />

List <strong>of</strong> Figures<br />

Figure 1: Regional Context <strong>of</strong> <strong>Ajax</strong> ................................................................................................................................................................... 9<br />

Figure 2: Requests for Municipal Spending on Selected Facilities.................................................................................................................... 11<br />

Figure 3: Historical <strong>and</strong> Projected Population, 2001‐2021 .............................................................................................................................. 14<br />

Figure 4: Distribution <strong>of</strong> Playgrounds ............................................................................................................................................................. 37<br />

List <strong>of</strong> Tables<br />

Table 1: Indoor <strong>Recreation</strong> Facility Needs, 2007‐2021 .................................................................................................................................... 19<br />

Table 2: Outdoor <strong>Recreation</strong> Facility Needs, 2007‐2021 ................................................................................................................................. 31<br />

Table 3: Summary <strong>of</strong> Parkl<strong>and</strong> by Designation................................................................................................................................................ 42<br />

Table 4a: Multi‐Use Community Centre – Proposed Phasing <strong>Plan</strong> ................................................................................................................... 73<br />

Table 4b: Multi‐Use Community Centre – Capital Costs........................................................................................................................................ 74<br />

Table 4c: Multi‐Use Community Centre – Outdoor Facility Costs.......................................................................................................................... 75<br />

Table 5a: Indoor Facilities – Proposed Phasing <strong>Plan</strong> ........................................................................................................................................ 75<br />

Table 5b: Outdoor Facilities – Proposed Phasing <strong>Plan</strong>.......................................................................................................................................... 76<br />

Table 5c: Other Required Studies – Proposed Phasing <strong>Plan</strong>.................................................................................................................................. 77<br />

MONTEITH BROWN PLANNING CONSULTANTS in association with Tucker‐Reid & Associates & The JF Group<br />

April 2008<br />

Page ii


Executive Summary<br />

Executive Summary<br />

The <strong>Recreation</strong>, <strong>Parks</strong> & <strong>Culture</strong> <strong>Master</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> is a tool to assist decision‐makers, stakeholders <strong>and</strong> the general public in<br />

determining needs <strong>and</strong> priorities related to services <strong>and</strong> facilities encompassing the recreation, parks <strong>and</strong> cultural<br />

dem<strong>and</strong>s <strong>of</strong> <strong>Ajax</strong>. The <strong>Master</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> provides an action plan that leads the development <strong>of</strong> future municipal facilities <strong>and</strong><br />

services in a fiscally responsible manner. The process was initiated in May 2007 <strong>and</strong> will be completed in April 2008.<br />

A detailed public consultation program, needs assessment <strong>and</strong> audit <strong>of</strong> the municipal service delivery system was<br />

undertaken throughout the master planning process. The key findings <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Master</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> are articulated as follows.<br />

“A Need for a New Multi‐Purpose, Multi‐Generational Facility”<br />

Based upon identified needs for a number <strong>of</strong> indoor facilities, it is the view <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Master</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> that multiple facilities<br />

warranted by future growth should be consolidated at a single location for the convenience <strong>of</strong> facility users, while also<br />

maximizing operational efficiencies <strong>and</strong> capitalizing on cross‐programming opportunities. The preferred location for the<br />

new multi‐use community centre is Sportsplex Park, located at the intersection <strong>of</strong> Taunton Road <strong>and</strong> Audley Road.<br />

Phase 1, to be initiated in 2011, will include:<br />

• indoor aquatics<br />

• multi‐purpose community <strong>and</strong> program<br />

space<br />

• full size gymnasium<br />

• active living / fitness studio<br />

• youth leisure space<br />

• preschool programming space<br />

• leasable tenant space<br />

Phase 2, to be initiated in 2016, will include:<br />

• twin‐pad arena (two ice rinks)<br />

• indoor walking track<br />

• older adult leisure space<br />

• other growth‐related facilities identified<br />

through future study<br />

“Multi‐Purpose Spaces to Meet Program <strong>and</strong> Community Requests”<br />

To meet program space dem<strong>and</strong>s associated with increasing registrations in municipal programming, as well as dem<strong>and</strong><br />

associated with community bookings, a need exists to provide additional venues that are flexible for a range <strong>of</strong><br />

opportunities. New multi‐purpose community <strong>and</strong> program space is recommended to be incorporated through the<br />

following developments:<br />

• new multi‐use community centre<br />

• Waterfront East Community Pavilion<br />

• Greenwood Pavilion<br />

• Future community school<br />

MONTEITH BROWN PLANNING CONSULTANTS in association with Tucker‐Reid & Associates & The JF Group<br />

April 2008<br />

Page iii


Executive Summary<br />

“A Focus on Leisure Requirements for Different Age Groups”<br />

In addition to dedicated leisure spaces recommended for youth <strong>and</strong> older adults at the proposed multi‐use community<br />

centres, the following considerations should be made:<br />

• Investigating opportunities to develop st<strong>and</strong>‐alone youth leisure space.<br />

• Augmenting “active living” <strong>and</strong> “wellness” programming opportunities at new <strong>and</strong> existing parks <strong>and</strong> leisure<br />

facilities.<br />

“A Community Development Approach to the Arts, <strong>Culture</strong> & Heritage Sectors”<br />

Using the <strong>Town</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Ajax</strong>’s Integrated Community Arts & Cultural <strong>Plan</strong> as the fundamental document guiding municipal<br />

direction, this <strong>Master</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> advocates continued focus upon working with the local arts <strong>and</strong> cultural community to build<br />

internal capacity to maximize their use <strong>of</strong> facilities <strong>and</strong> services now <strong>and</strong> in the future. This may involve the development<br />

<strong>of</strong> a funding strategy to support the development <strong>of</strong> arts <strong>and</strong> cultural programming, events <strong>and</strong> the acquisition <strong>of</strong> public<br />

art.<br />

Consistent with <strong>Town</strong> Council’s recently approved vision for the Pickering Village, this area contains the potential to<br />

become a hub <strong>of</strong> creative activity in <strong>Ajax</strong> through its historical character, presence <strong>of</strong> creative industries, <strong>and</strong> municipal<br />

heritage assets. It is recommended through this <strong>Master</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> that further study be undertaken to determine how best to<br />

maximize creative potential through investments in the following municipal assets:<br />

• St. Francis de Sales Church – a possible venue for holding community‐level arts <strong>and</strong> theatrical productions; <strong>and</strong><br />

• Village Community Centre – a possible venue for a multi‐purpose, multi‐media centre for the visual <strong>and</strong><br />

performing arts <strong>and</strong> as a destination point for cultural activity in <strong>Ajax</strong> (to be considered when arena needs are<br />

reconciled through the development <strong>of</strong> a new twin pad arena at the proposed multi‐use community centre).<br />

Heritage preservation is also seen as being important, in line with other municipal objectives <strong>and</strong> through ongoing<br />

discussions with the Heritage Advisory Committee.<br />

“Providing Parkl<strong>and</strong> & Trails to Meet the Needs <strong>of</strong> New Residents”<br />

The provision <strong>of</strong> parkl<strong>and</strong> is necessary to service outdoor leisure pursuits for residents. For this reason, it is important to<br />

maintain a sufficient supply <strong>of</strong> active parkl<strong>and</strong> for sport <strong>and</strong> recreational needs, as well as passive parkl<strong>and</strong> for<br />

conservation <strong>and</strong> public enjoyment <strong>of</strong> open spaces. The following key considerations pertain to parkl<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> trails:<br />

• It is recommended through the <strong>Master</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> that the <strong>Town</strong> set a provision target <strong>of</strong> 2.0 hectares <strong>of</strong> active<br />

parkl<strong>and</strong> per 1,000 residents to service needs for leisure opportunities. Through future acquisitions <strong>and</strong><br />

conveyances, the <strong>Town</strong> is expected to acquire sufficient levels <strong>of</strong> active parkl<strong>and</strong> (i.e. through plans <strong>of</strong><br />

subdivision, secondary plans, etc.) to meet future dem<strong>and</strong> at the aforementioned rate.<br />

MONTEITH BROWN PLANNING CONSULTANTS in association with Tucker‐Reid & Associates & The JF Group<br />

April 2008<br />

Page iv


Executive Summary<br />

• Expansion <strong>of</strong> the existing greenbelt systems as a means to develop corridors that serve ecological <strong>and</strong> passive<br />

recreational purposes, in line with recommendations contained in the Vision 2020 Bicycle & Leisure Trail System<br />

<strong>Plan</strong>. Continued development <strong>of</strong> waterfront trails that showcase the exceptional aesthetic value <strong>of</strong> Lake<br />

Ontario, Duffins Bay <strong>and</strong>/or other creek systems contained within <strong>Ajax</strong> is also encouraged.<br />

• Developing parks to respond to various leisure trends <strong>and</strong> program dem<strong>and</strong>s by incorporating spaces <strong>and</strong><br />

amenities which encourage physical activity, wellness <strong>and</strong> informal uses. Inclusion <strong>of</strong> such opportunities should<br />

be <strong>of</strong> prime consideration in the design <strong>of</strong> parks in order to encourage use <strong>and</strong> facilitate physical activity levels<br />

<strong>and</strong> social interaction. Furthermore, future park designs (as well as trail <strong>and</strong> facility designs) should continue to<br />

afford a high degree <strong>of</strong> public safety.<br />

Furthermore, the <strong>Town</strong> should remain committed to its role as a leader in environmental responsibility <strong>and</strong> continue to<br />

design parks that incorporate natural, indigenous vegetation features in order to foster an appreciation for such areas<br />

<strong>and</strong> maintain crucial ecological functions. The <strong>Town</strong> should continually develop innovative <strong>and</strong> engaging initiatives, in<br />

partnership with local conservation authorities <strong>and</strong> other experts in environmental management, which encourage<br />

environmental stewardship <strong>and</strong> the role <strong>of</strong> individuals in maintaining <strong>and</strong> enhancing ecological systems in <strong>Ajax</strong>.<br />

“Sports Field Developments”<br />

The following key considerations are relevant to meeting dem<strong>and</strong>s for sports fields at municipal parks:<br />

• Construct seven new soccer fields (unlit full field equivalents) by the year 2021 – these can potentially be<br />

accommodated within a combination <strong>of</strong> eight future parks <strong>and</strong>/or a number <strong>of</strong> existing parks, as deemed<br />

appropriate by the <strong>Town</strong> at the time <strong>of</strong> their design.<br />

• Consider repurposing the surplus in lower quality / under‐utilized ball diamonds to other uses (i.e. soccer,<br />

passive parkl<strong>and</strong>, etc.).<br />

• Consider the feasibility <strong>of</strong> constructing an artificial turf field, as well as possibilities to enclose it during the<br />

winter months.<br />

“Employing Multi‐Use Court Designs”<br />

In terms <strong>of</strong> playing courts, rather than providing the traditional single purpose template (i.e. dedicated tennis courts <strong>and</strong><br />

basketball courts), the <strong>Town</strong> should utilize a multi‐use court design template for future neighbourhood‐level courts<br />

(which would allow for tennis, basketball, ball hockey, outdoor skating, etc.). The multi‐use template would not apply if<br />

developing competitive‐level facilities.<br />

Based upon tennis <strong>and</strong> basketball targets as a base, future growth suggests that six new multi‐use courts are required by<br />

2021. Where <strong>and</strong> when required, the <strong>Town</strong> should also upgrade existing courts to provide a higher quality experience for<br />

users.<br />

MONTEITH BROWN PLANNING CONSULTANTS in association with Tucker‐Reid & Associates & The JF Group<br />

April 2008<br />

Page v


Executive Summary<br />

“Improving Skateboarding Opportunities”<br />

Needs assessments <strong>and</strong> consultations with local skateboarding community suggest that one new skateboard park is<br />

warranted around the year 2011 <strong>and</strong> would ideally be situated at Sportsplex Park as part <strong>of</strong> the proposed multi‐use<br />

facility complex. Incorporation <strong>of</strong> basic “skate zones” for beginner <strong>and</strong> intermediate users is seen as beneficial through<br />

the park design <strong>and</strong> renewal process, where appropriate.<br />

Furthermore, minor improvements are suggested for the <strong>Town</strong>’s existing skateboard parks to improve the flow <strong>of</strong> these<br />

facilities <strong>and</strong> provide a more enjoyable experience for users. Any design or redesign <strong>of</strong> new <strong>and</strong> existing skateboard parks<br />

should be undertaken in consultation with the skateboarding community <strong>and</strong> other interested users.<br />

“Developing Waterfront Areas as a <strong>Town</strong>‐Wide Asset”<br />

The waterfront is a key component <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Town</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Ajax</strong>’s local recreation <strong>and</strong> cultural system, <strong>and</strong> also forms a major<br />

destination point in <strong>Ajax</strong>’s community gathering <strong>and</strong> tourism infrastructure. The continued development <strong>of</strong> appropriate<br />

tourism <strong>and</strong> civic infrastructure in the waterfront area is encouraged to solidify the area as an attraction <strong>and</strong> destination<br />

for both residents <strong>and</strong> visitors alike. Where possible, the <strong>Town</strong> should continue to integrate north‐south greenways with<br />

the Waterfront Trail <strong>and</strong> other recreation <strong>and</strong> cultural assets in support <strong>of</strong> establishing a comprehensive system <strong>of</strong> trails<br />

<strong>and</strong> pathways throughout <strong>Ajax</strong>. As a primary source <strong>of</strong> direction in waterfront planning, the key findings <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Waterfront Management <strong>Plan</strong> should continue to be implemented.<br />

Acquisition <strong>of</strong> l<strong>and</strong> along waterways is encouraged, particularly along the north‐south creeks <strong>and</strong> associated tributaries<br />

present in <strong>Ajax</strong>. Doing so will increase the supply <strong>of</strong> passive open spaces <strong>and</strong> ensure protection <strong>of</strong> environmentally<br />

significant riparian areas. Enhancing beach facilities as a means to draw residents to the waterfront is encouraged; this<br />

will also require attention to water quality levels in Lake Ontario to ensure that they are optimal for swimming.<br />

“Other Outdoor Amenities”<br />

The following considerations to other amenities discussed in the <strong>Master</strong> <strong>Plan</strong>:<br />

• Development <strong>of</strong> three new splash pads, preferably at the <strong>Ajax</strong> Waterfront, Sportsplex Park <strong>and</strong> another suitable<br />

location confirmed through future study.<br />

• Providing playgrounds at a service radius <strong>of</strong> 500 metres <strong>of</strong> all major residential areas, uninhibited by major<br />

barriers. Additional barrier‐free playgrounds are recommended in major community parks, as appropriate.<br />

• Additional <strong>of</strong>f‐leash dog parks, particularly when a willing community organization is able to contribute<br />

sufficiently to its operation through a cost‐sharing arrangement with the municipality.<br />

• Responding to requests for facilities presently not part <strong>of</strong> the core m<strong>and</strong>ate on a case‐by‐case basis by<br />

evaluating the municipality’s role in providing the service in relation to quantified market dem<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> costeffectiveness<br />

<strong>of</strong> such services, while also identifying potential strategies to address long‐term need for such<br />

requests should a sufficient level <strong>of</strong> dem<strong>and</strong> be expressed.<br />

MONTEITH BROWN PLANNING CONSULTANTS in association with Tucker‐Reid & Associates & The JF Group<br />

April 2008<br />

Page vi


Strategic Direction<br />

Chapter 1: Strategic Direction<br />

1.1 Purpose <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Master</strong> <strong>Plan</strong><br />

The <strong>Recreation</strong>, <strong>Parks</strong> & <strong>Culture</strong> <strong>Master</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> is a tool to assist<br />

decision‐makers, stakeholders <strong>and</strong> the general public in<br />

determining needs <strong>and</strong> priorities related to services <strong>and</strong> facilities<br />

encompassing the recreation, parks <strong>and</strong> cultural dem<strong>and</strong>s <strong>of</strong> <strong>Ajax</strong>.<br />

The goal <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Master</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> is to provide an action plan that leads<br />

the development <strong>of</strong> future municipal facilities <strong>and</strong> services in a<br />

fiscally responsible manner. The scope <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Master</strong> <strong>Plan</strong><br />

encompasses the <strong>Town</strong>’s role in providing services <strong>and</strong> facilities<br />

pertaining to recreation, parks, arts, culture <strong>and</strong> heritage entities<br />

through to the year 2021.<br />

1.2 Supporting Documents<br />

The <strong>Master</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> has involved significant efforts in research,<br />

consultation, data analysis <strong>and</strong> strategy development. As such, a<br />

considerable amount <strong>of</strong> information has been recorded. This<br />

document summarizes a number <strong>of</strong> background reports including<br />

the <strong>Plan</strong>ning Context Report, Needs Assessment Report <strong>and</strong><br />

Service Rationalization, Priorities & Partnership Report which<br />

contain detailed information, methodologies, <strong>and</strong> analyses<br />

regarding the various elements contained within this <strong>Plan</strong>.<br />

1.3 Definition <strong>of</strong> <strong>Recreation</strong> & <strong>Culture</strong><br />

Throughout the <strong>Master</strong> <strong>Plan</strong>, a number <strong>of</strong> references are made to<br />

the terms “recreation”, “leisure”, “arts”, <strong>and</strong> “culture”.<br />

The term “recreation” can be broadly defined as activities<br />

consisting <strong>of</strong> all sporting, fitness <strong>and</strong> physical pursuits that a<br />

person or group pursues for the purposes <strong>of</strong> personal satisfaction<br />

<strong>and</strong> development, physical health <strong>and</strong>/or competition.<br />

The term “culture” will mean, but is not limited to, the arts,<br />

cultural industries, museums, architecture, natural <strong>and</strong> heritage<br />

resources. <strong>Culture</strong> can also encompass the attitudes, lifestyles,<br />

customs <strong>and</strong> beliefs that distinguishes residents from each other.<br />

The “arts” include music, theatre, dance, visual arts <strong>and</strong> literature.<br />

Finally, the term “leisure” is a combination <strong>of</strong> all recreation,<br />

cultural, creative, intellectual <strong>and</strong> social activities that a person or<br />

group pursues in their free time for the purposes <strong>of</strong> personal<br />

satisfaction <strong>and</strong> development.<br />

In conjunction with the <strong>Master</strong> <strong>Plan</strong>, the <strong>Town</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Ajax</strong> <strong>and</strong> the<br />

Project Consultants have prepared a separate Sports & Physical<br />

Activity Strategy which facilitates higher activity <strong>and</strong> participation<br />

levels among residents, in keeping with the vision, goals <strong>and</strong><br />

objectives <strong>of</strong> the provincial Active2010 strategy. This <strong>Master</strong> <strong>Plan</strong><br />

serves as a companion document to the Sports & Physical Activity<br />

Strategy.<br />

MONTEITH BROWN PLANNING CONSULTANTS in association with Tucker‐Reid & Associates & The JF Group<br />

April 2008<br />

Page 1


Strategic Direction<br />

1.4 <strong>Master</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> Process<br />

The <strong>Recreation</strong>, <strong>Parks</strong> & <strong>Culture</strong> <strong>Master</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> was nearly a yearlong<br />

process which commenced in May 2007 <strong>and</strong> concluded in<br />

April 2008. The following process chart illustrates key steps taken<br />

in preparing the <strong>Master</strong> <strong>Plan</strong>.<br />

MONTEITH BROWN PLANNING CONSULTANTS in association with Tucker‐Reid & Associates & The JF Group<br />

April 2008<br />

Page 2


Strategic Direction<br />

1.5 <strong>Master</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> Goals<br />

The <strong>Master</strong> <strong>Plan</strong>’s goals are high level, directional statements<br />

which articulate the overall context for what is intended to be<br />

accomplished. Goals are the ideals that the <strong>Town</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Ajax</strong> <strong>and</strong> the<br />

community should strive to achieve over time. The goals<br />

articulated below embrace the provision <strong>of</strong> recreation, parks,<br />

culture <strong>and</strong> arts programs, services, facilities, <strong>and</strong> open space.<br />

Goal 1:<br />

Foster a strong sense <strong>of</strong> identity <strong>and</strong> community pride.<br />

Goal 2:<br />

Assume a leadership role in providing <strong>and</strong> facilitating<br />

recreation, parks, arts <strong>and</strong> cultural services.<br />

Goal 3:<br />

Facilitate a healthy lifestyle for our citizens by<br />

providing a diverse range <strong>of</strong> physical <strong>and</strong> social<br />

opportunities through collective efforts with<br />

community partners.<br />

Goal 8:<br />

Seek opportunities to deliver services to all residents in<br />

partnership with other public, community <strong>and</strong> private<br />

sector providers.<br />

Goal 4:<br />

Offer programs <strong>and</strong> facilities which are based on<br />

community requirements that are accessible, inclusive<br />

<strong>and</strong> meet the evolving needs <strong>of</strong> the community.<br />

Goal 9:<br />

Support municipal staff & local volunteers with the<br />

resources that they require to deliver quality,<br />

enjoyable <strong>and</strong> safe services.<br />

Goal 5:<br />

Goal 6:<br />

Goal 7:<br />

Respect our environment <strong>and</strong> natural heritage through<br />

promotion <strong>of</strong> conservation, preservation <strong>and</strong> creating<br />

a healthier <strong>Ajax</strong>.<br />

Promote <strong>and</strong> strengthen the arts <strong>and</strong> cultural sector as<br />

a means to stimulate creativity <strong>and</strong> appreciation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

arts among residents <strong>and</strong> businesses in <strong>Ajax</strong>.<br />

Enhance the comprehensive trail system which <strong>of</strong>fers<br />

active transportation, programming <strong>and</strong> event<br />

opportunities, interpretation, internal <strong>and</strong> external<br />

connectivity, <strong>and</strong> social cohesion.<br />

Goal 10: Support <strong>and</strong> enhance opportunities for special events<br />

<strong>and</strong> tourism to build community spirit <strong>and</strong> develop<br />

economic benefit.<br />

MONTEITH BROWN PLANNING CONSULTANTS in association with Tucker‐Reid & Associates & The JF Group<br />

April 2008<br />

Page 3


Strategic Direction<br />

1.6 <strong>Master</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> Objectives<br />

The <strong>Master</strong> <strong>Plan</strong>’s objectives are specific elements <strong>of</strong> the goals<br />

<strong>and</strong> represent a “desired end result.” As such, these objectives<br />

guide the development <strong>and</strong> implementation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

recommendations contained in the <strong>Plan</strong>, as well as for future<br />

decision‐making for the <strong>Town</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Ajax</strong>.<br />

Goal 1: Foster a strong sense <strong>of</strong> identity <strong>and</strong> community.<br />

Objectives:<br />

a) Design public facilities as “public spaces” that help define a sense <strong>of</strong> community cohesion in <strong>Ajax</strong>.<br />

b) Encourage civic beautification initiatives among corporate citizens <strong>and</strong> residents to improve the <strong>Town</strong> aesthetic appeal.<br />

c) Promote the preservation <strong>of</strong> natural, archaeological, or intangible cultural resources to showcase <strong>Ajax</strong>’s rich heritage.<br />

d) Develop br<strong>and</strong>ing to improve identity <strong>and</strong> improve messaging to the community.<br />

Goal 2: Assume a leadership role in providing <strong>and</strong> facilitating recreation, parks, arts <strong>and</strong> cultural services.<br />

Objectives:<br />

a) Employ effective growth management strategies to adequately plan for higher dem<strong>and</strong>s on facilities, services <strong>and</strong> staff<br />

resources.<br />

b) Commit to providing an efficient, integrated <strong>and</strong> user‐friendly customer service system in the delivery <strong>of</strong> recreation, parks<br />

<strong>and</strong> cultural services.<br />

c) Develop a program <strong>and</strong> service model to set future direction for how programs <strong>and</strong> services are developed <strong>and</strong> delivered.<br />

d) Exercise fiscal accountability through cost‐effective <strong>and</strong> efficient management <strong>of</strong> resources, the appropriate application <strong>of</strong><br />

user fees, <strong>and</strong> maximization <strong>of</strong> potential funding sources <strong>and</strong> community resources.<br />

e) Appropriately consult with residents <strong>and</strong> user groups in facility <strong>and</strong> program planning, particularly when significant<br />

changes are to take place in the community.<br />

f) Through continued marketing efforts, endeavour to increase awareness <strong>of</strong> the opportunities <strong>of</strong>fered by the <strong>Town</strong> <strong>and</strong> the<br />

benefits <strong>of</strong> participating in active lifestyle.<br />

g) Demonstrate that the <strong>Town</strong> employees <strong>and</strong> Council members continue to embrace an active lifestyle.<br />

MONTEITH BROWN PLANNING CONSULTANTS in association with Tucker‐Reid & Associates & The JF Group<br />

April 2008<br />

Page 4


Strategic Direction<br />

Goal 3:<br />

Facilitate a healthy lifestyle for our citizens by providing a diverse range <strong>of</strong> physical <strong>and</strong> social<br />

opportunities through collective efforts with community partners.<br />

Objectives:<br />

a) Encourage physical activity by committing to the provision, facilitation <strong>and</strong> promotion <strong>of</strong> high quality recreation <strong>and</strong> active<br />

living opportunities.<br />

b) Provide or facilitate the development <strong>of</strong> infrastructure necessary that allows the advancement <strong>of</strong> the recreation, arts <strong>and</strong><br />

cultural sectors.<br />

c) Placing a continued emphasis on supporting activities that encourage healthy living, wellness <strong>and</strong> personal development in<br />

a manner that responds to current trends <strong>and</strong> the needs <strong>of</strong> residents.<br />

Goal 4:<br />

Offer programs <strong>and</strong> facilities which are based on community requirements that are accessible,<br />

inclusive <strong>and</strong> meet the evolving needs <strong>of</strong> the community.<br />

Objectives:<br />

a) Facilities <strong>and</strong> programs should be <strong>of</strong>fered in a safe <strong>and</strong> equitable manner so that persons <strong>of</strong> all backgrounds are welcome<br />

to participate.<br />

b) By embracing <strong>Ajax</strong>’s diversity, a variety <strong>of</strong> services will be provided in a manner that meets the needs <strong>of</strong> our multicultural<br />

population.<br />

c) Wherever possible, facilities <strong>and</strong> programs will be designed to minimize physical <strong>and</strong> social barriers that may affect<br />

persons with special needs <strong>and</strong> physical impairments.<br />

d) Services should be <strong>of</strong>fered at locations which can be readily accessed by multiple transportation options.<br />

e) Different approaches will be taken to include residents who cannot afford to pay user fees <strong>and</strong> equipment costs.<br />

MONTEITH BROWN PLANNING CONSULTANTS in association with Tucker‐Reid & Associates & The JF Group<br />

April 2008<br />

Page 5


Strategic Direction<br />

Goal 5:<br />

Respect our environment <strong>and</strong> natural heritage through the promotion <strong>of</strong> conservation,<br />

preservation <strong>and</strong> creating a healthier <strong>Ajax</strong>.<br />

Objectives:<br />

a) Develop initiatives which build upon <strong>Ajax</strong>’s natural beauty <strong>and</strong> environmental features by providing leadership on how<br />

best to enhance <strong>and</strong> utilize these natural features.<br />

b) Pursue an ecosystem‐based approach to the planning, development <strong>and</strong> operation <strong>of</strong> facilities, parkl<strong>and</strong>, open spaces,<br />

natural <strong>and</strong> environmental features.<br />

c) Preserve, protect <strong>and</strong> enhance <strong>Ajax</strong>’s unique natural heritage resources, placing priority on protecting waterways <strong>and</strong><br />

shorelines, sustaining the urban forest <strong>and</strong> encouraging the greening <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Town</strong>.<br />

d) Educate the community about the significance <strong>of</strong> natural areas <strong>and</strong> the importance <strong>of</strong> environmental management<br />

through public awareness, outreach programming, <strong>and</strong> encouraging appropriate uses <strong>of</strong> space.<br />

e) Ensure that the <strong>Town</strong> showcases its liveability through beautification efforts.<br />

Goal 6:<br />

Promote <strong>and</strong> strengthen the arts <strong>and</strong> cultural sector as a means to stimulate creativity <strong>and</strong><br />

appreciation <strong>of</strong> the arts among residents <strong>and</strong> businesses in <strong>Ajax</strong>.<br />

Objectives:<br />

a) Enhance the variety, diversity <strong>and</strong> accessibility <strong>of</strong> creative cultural experiences <strong>and</strong> programs.<br />

b) Provide places <strong>and</strong> spaces for cultural <strong>and</strong> artistic activities throughout the community including opportunities for public<br />

art.<br />

c) Support a climate where the arts, cultural <strong>and</strong> heritage community can flourish though economic investment <strong>and</strong> cultural<br />

renewal.<br />

d) Create an environment that encourages a thriving artistic <strong>and</strong> cultural community.<br />

MONTEITH BROWN PLANNING CONSULTANTS in association with Tucker‐Reid & Associates & The JF Group<br />

April 2008<br />

Page 6


Strategic Direction<br />

Goal 7:<br />

Enhance the comprehensive trail system which <strong>of</strong>fers active transportation, programming <strong>and</strong><br />

event opportunities, interpretation, internal <strong>and</strong> external connectivity, <strong>and</strong> social cohesion.<br />

Objectives:<br />

a) Work towards an accessible network <strong>of</strong> trails that is appealing to a wide range <strong>of</strong> users <strong>and</strong> is able to <strong>of</strong>fer a number <strong>of</strong><br />

visual, social, recreational, interpretive <strong>and</strong> physical experiences.<br />

b) Develop an interconnected trail <strong>and</strong> pathway system that connects people to places within the community <strong>and</strong> to areas<br />

adjacent to the <strong>Town</strong>.<br />

c) Encourage the integration <strong>of</strong> cycling onto the <strong>Town</strong>’s road system through a combination <strong>of</strong> facility development <strong>and</strong><br />

public education.<br />

Goal 8:<br />

Seek opportunities to deliver recreation, parks <strong>and</strong> cultural services to all residents in partnership<br />

with other public, community <strong>and</strong> private sector providers.<br />

Objectives:<br />

a) Form appropriate partnerships as a means to effectively manage growth <strong>and</strong> development, <strong>and</strong> harness the communitybuilding<br />

capacity <strong>of</strong> potential partners.<br />

b) Encourage the involvement <strong>of</strong> community organizations, service providers <strong>and</strong> adjacent municipalities in the recreation,<br />

parks <strong>and</strong> culture system through appropriate partnerships <strong>and</strong> collaborations.<br />

c) Make every effort to strengthen relationships with existing partners to find ways to collectively improve the delivery <strong>of</strong><br />

services.<br />

d) Continue to partner <strong>and</strong> work cooperatively with the Boards <strong>of</strong> Education to provide access to school facilities <strong>and</strong><br />

grounds.<br />

e) Strengthen the <strong>Town</strong>’s leadership role through community engagement with all segments <strong>of</strong> the population.<br />

MONTEITH BROWN PLANNING CONSULTANTS in association with Tucker‐Reid & Associates & The JF Group<br />

April 2008<br />

Page 7


Strategic Direction<br />

Goal 9:<br />

Objectives:<br />

Support Municipal Staff & Local Volunteers with the resources that they require to deliver<br />

quality, enjoyable <strong>and</strong> safe services.<br />

a) Provide <strong>Recreation</strong> Services Department <strong>and</strong> other related Department staff with appropriate supports to ensure that they<br />

have the ability to respond to the dem<strong>and</strong>s <strong>of</strong> the public <strong>and</strong> the <strong>Town</strong>, in light <strong>of</strong> evolving trends <strong>and</strong> community<br />

characteristics.<br />

b) Provide volunteers with adequate support, personal development opportunities <strong>and</strong> recognition to advance their skills <strong>and</strong><br />

showcase the valuable work contributed by these individuals.<br />

Goal 10: Support <strong>and</strong> enhance opportunities for special events <strong>and</strong> tourism to build community spirit <strong>and</strong><br />

develop economic benefit.<br />

Objectives:<br />

a) Encourage <strong>and</strong> support the provision <strong>of</strong> quality special events to bring the <strong>Town</strong>’s residents together to share, celebrate<br />

<strong>and</strong> enjoy community gatherings.<br />

b) Promote <strong>and</strong> support tourism‐related activities aimed at creating economic development opportunities.<br />

MONTEITH BROWN PLANNING CONSULTANTS in association with Tucker‐Reid & Associates & The JF Group<br />

April 2008<br />

Page 8


<strong>Master</strong> <strong>Plan</strong>ning Context<br />

Chapter 2: <strong>Master</strong> <strong>Plan</strong>ning Context<br />

2.1 The <strong>Town</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Ajax</strong><br />

Located in Durham Region, the <strong>Town</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Ajax</strong> <strong>of</strong>fers a vibrant mix<br />

<strong>of</strong> established <strong>and</strong> new residential neighbourhoods, along with a<br />

rich natural heritage that consists <strong>of</strong> nearly 570 hectares <strong>of</strong> parks,<br />

open spaces <strong>and</strong> environmentally significant areas, many <strong>of</strong> which<br />

are located along a number <strong>of</strong> waterways. <strong>Ajax</strong>’s six kilometres <strong>of</strong><br />

waterfront property along Lake Ontario remains largely<br />

undeveloped for the enjoyment <strong>of</strong> residents <strong>and</strong> visitors alike.<br />

The arts <strong>and</strong> culture sectors play a vibrant role in showcasing<br />

<strong>Ajax</strong>’s rich heritage, <strong>and</strong> the <strong>Town</strong>’s historical base is particularly<br />

evident in the Pickering Village. All <strong>of</strong> these factors, along with a<br />

thriving business community, contribute to the high quality <strong>of</strong> life<br />

that <strong>Ajax</strong> <strong>of</strong>fers to its residents.<br />

Figure 1: Regional Context <strong>of</strong> <strong>Ajax</strong><br />

The 2006 Census records <strong>Ajax</strong>’s population at 90,167,<br />

representing an increase <strong>of</strong> over 22% from the year 2001. Much<br />

<strong>of</strong> the population growth has been driven by the <strong>Town</strong>’s location<br />

in the Greater Toronto Area, one <strong>of</strong> the fastest growing<br />

metropolitan areas in the country. The majority <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Town</strong>’s<br />

residents commute to their jobs, primarily to the City <strong>of</strong> Toronto<br />

which is approximately 50 kilometres west <strong>of</strong> <strong>Ajax</strong>.<br />

MONTEITH BROWN PLANNING CONSULTANTS in association with Tucker‐Reid & Associates & The JF Group<br />

April 2008<br />

Page 9


<strong>Master</strong> <strong>Plan</strong>ning Context<br />

2.2 The Community Consultation Program<br />

The <strong>Master</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> employed an extensive community consultation<br />

process that spanned the entire planning period. The<br />

consultation process allowed stakeholders, local <strong>and</strong> regional<br />

service providers, municipal staff <strong>and</strong> <strong>Town</strong> Council, <strong>and</strong> the<br />

general public to provide their insights <strong>and</strong> opinions pertaining to<br />

recreation, parks <strong>and</strong> culture.<br />

In particular, the Community Consultation Program utilized the<br />

following initiatives to gather feedback:<br />

• community <strong>and</strong> user‐group questionnaires (June 2007);<br />

• a statistically significant household survey (June 2007);<br />

• interviews with key informants (June 2007);<br />

• a Community Search Conference (October 2007);<br />

• workshops with <strong>Town</strong> staff (January 2008);<br />

• online feedback form (ongoing throughout the process);<br />

• presentations to the General Government Committee,<br />

the Management Committee <strong>and</strong> <strong>Town</strong> Council (ongoing<br />

throughout the process); <strong>and</strong><br />

• public meetings <strong>and</strong> open houses (March 2008).<br />

2.2.1 Community <strong>and</strong> User Group Questionnaires<br />

A survey was distributed to local organizations with an interest in<br />

recreation, parks <strong>and</strong> cultural activities. A total <strong>of</strong> 67 surveys<br />

were returned <strong>and</strong> the key points are summarized as follows:<br />

• Between 2005 <strong>and</strong> 2007, 43% <strong>of</strong> groups reported an<br />

increase in their membership/participation level, 18%<br />

reported a decrease <strong>and</strong> 30% reported stable<br />

membership levels.<br />

• 72% <strong>of</strong> groups report plans to exp<strong>and</strong> the scope <strong>of</strong> their<br />

membership, programming or services while only 3%<br />

have plans to reduce <strong>and</strong> 16% will maintain the present<br />

level.<br />

• The most utilized municipal facilities include the <strong>Ajax</strong><br />

Community Centre (used by 30% <strong>of</strong> groups), the Village<br />

Arena & Community Centre (13%), the McLean<br />

Community Centre (11%) – users appear to be generally<br />

satisfied with these facilities.<br />

• 62% <strong>of</strong> groups require additional access to existing<br />

facilities while 38% do not.<br />

• 62% <strong>of</strong> groups cite a need for additional facilities over the<br />

next ten years while 31% do not (7% are unsure).<br />

• 26% <strong>of</strong> groups would be willing to provide capital<br />

contributions towards the development <strong>of</strong> new facilities<br />

while 54% would not (largely due to limited funds).<br />

• 53% would consider partnerships with the <strong>Town</strong> or other<br />

groups to deliver their services while 20% would not.<br />

• 57% are able to attract enough volunteers while 25% are<br />

not – 33% would benefit from additional training for their<br />

volunteers while 44% would not.<br />

MONTEITH BROWN PLANNING CONSULTANTS in association with Tucker‐Reid & Associates & The JF Group<br />

April 2008<br />

Page 10


<strong>Master</strong> <strong>Plan</strong>ning Context<br />

2.2.2 Household Survey<br />

The household survey <strong>of</strong> r<strong>and</strong>om local residences is considered to<br />

be statistically significant (yielding a confidence level <strong>of</strong> 95% with<br />

a confidence interval <strong>of</strong> ±5%) <strong>and</strong> representative <strong>of</strong> the local<br />

population. Key findings from the household survey include:<br />

Figure 2: Requests for Municipal Spending on Selected Facilities<br />

• 56% <strong>of</strong> respondents were able to participate in<br />

recreation activities as <strong>of</strong>ten as they would like, while<br />

55% <strong>of</strong> those were able to participate in arts <strong>and</strong> cultural<br />

activities to the desired degree.<br />

• The primary barrier to participation in recreation, arts<br />

<strong>and</strong> culture was cited to be a lack <strong>of</strong> time.<br />

• 64% <strong>of</strong> respondents participate in “all” <strong>and</strong> 25%<br />

participate in “most” <strong>of</strong> their recreation <strong>and</strong> cultural<br />

activities within the <strong>Town</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Ajax</strong>.<br />

• Respondents were generally satisfied with the leisure<br />

opportunities available to children <strong>and</strong> seniors, <strong>and</strong> least<br />

satisfied with opportunities available for youth.<br />

• 26% stated that they would like to see new recreation<br />

<strong>and</strong> cultural programs <strong>of</strong>fered – the most common<br />

requests pertained to theatre, arts <strong>and</strong> crafts classes,<br />

music classes <strong>and</strong> age‐specific recreation programs.<br />

• The top five facility requests were for nature trails, youth<br />

centre, senior’s centre, paved trails <strong>and</strong> splash/spray<br />

pads (see Figure 2).<br />

• 84% <strong>of</strong> respondents agreed that recreation services<br />

should be a high priority for <strong>Town</strong> Council, while 65%<br />

agreed that arts <strong>and</strong> cultural services should be a high<br />

priority.<br />

MONTEITH BROWN PLANNING CONSULTANTS in association with Tucker‐Reid & Associates & The JF Group<br />

April 2008<br />

Page 11


<strong>Master</strong> <strong>Plan</strong>ning Context<br />

2.2.3 Community Search Conference<br />

A Search Conference was held on October 17 th , 2007 at the <strong>Ajax</strong><br />

<strong>Town</strong> Hall. This session was attended by a total <strong>of</strong> 64 individuals<br />

representing 34 community organizations, <strong>and</strong> also included local<br />

residents, youth, <strong>and</strong> seniors. <strong>Town</strong> Council members were<br />

invited to observe while <strong>Town</strong> staff assisted the Project<br />

Consultants by facilitating small group discussions.<br />

A number <strong>of</strong> key themes emerged from the search conference. In<br />

terms <strong>of</strong> values, residents embraced the natural environment <strong>and</strong><br />

the <strong>Town</strong>’s leadership role in environmental management.<br />

Participants also articulated the desire to maintain a small‐town<br />

atmosphere in the context <strong>of</strong> rapid growth, by showcasing <strong>Ajax</strong>’s<br />

rich history <strong>and</strong> encouraging civic pride as means to develop<br />

community spirit <strong>and</strong> facilitate volunteerism.<br />

In terms <strong>of</strong> challenges faced by users <strong>of</strong> the recreation <strong>and</strong><br />

cultural system, participants identified three primary barriers: lack<br />

<strong>of</strong> time, cost, <strong>and</strong> availability <strong>of</strong> facilities.<br />

To address time‐related pressures, some potential solutions<br />

included the provision <strong>of</strong> flexible program choices <strong>and</strong><br />

unstructured activities at municipal facilities <strong>and</strong> incorporating<br />

personal fitness / active living opportunities through park design.<br />

In response to affordability barriers, ideas surrounded lowering<br />

the cost to participate in activities through adjustment <strong>and</strong><br />

differentiation <strong>of</strong> pricing points, price incentives, <strong>and</strong> encouraging<br />

partnerships <strong>and</strong> volunteer efforts to lower the effective cost <strong>of</strong><br />

certain services. Finally, to increase the number <strong>of</strong> facilities,<br />

participants encouraged use <strong>of</strong> local schools <strong>and</strong> new facility<br />

development to accommodate higher levels <strong>of</strong> dem<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> to<br />

accommodate population growth.<br />

facilities or program <strong>of</strong>ferings) <strong>and</strong> for informative purposes (i.e.<br />

advertising the opportunities available in <strong>Ajax</strong>).<br />

Finally, search conference participants were asked to evaluate<br />

what role they believe the <strong>Town</strong> should play in delivering specific<br />

services. The top five roles (listed in order <strong>of</strong> priority), as reported<br />

by participants, for the municipality are as follows:<br />

i. Protecting <strong>and</strong> enhancing the natural environment.<br />

ii. Communicating <strong>and</strong> promoting the leisure <strong>and</strong><br />

recreational opportunities available in <strong>Ajax</strong>.<br />

iii. Playing a part in enhancing a vibrant <strong>and</strong> attractive<br />

community.<br />

iv. Providing <strong>and</strong> supporting family leisure opportunities.<br />

v. Encouraging community special events <strong>and</strong> festivals.<br />

Through the search conference, a number <strong>of</strong> creative <strong>and</strong> unique<br />

ideas were expressed to address challenges <strong>and</strong> build upon<br />

community strengths. These community‐based solutions were<br />

considered throughout the planning process <strong>and</strong> incorporated<br />

into the <strong>Master</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> where possible.<br />

Participants appeared to advocate a strong focus on high quality<br />

<strong>and</strong> innovative design in facilities <strong>and</strong> programming. Emphasis<br />

was also placed on communication between the <strong>Town</strong> <strong>and</strong> the<br />

community, both for consultative purposes (i.e. in designing new<br />

MONTEITH BROWN PLANNING CONSULTANTS in association with Tucker‐Reid & Associates & The JF Group<br />

April 2008<br />

Page 12


<strong>Master</strong> <strong>Plan</strong>ning Context<br />

2.2.4 Key Informant Interviews & Staff Workshops<br />

In June 2007, interviews were conducted with the Mayor,<br />

members <strong>of</strong> Council, <strong>Town</strong> staff, key stakeholder groups <strong>and</strong><br />

various agencies (e.g. Region <strong>of</strong> Durham, school boards, etc.).<br />

These interviews provided the opportunity for c<strong>and</strong>id discussion<br />

on major topics including: fiscal resources; physical resources;<br />

human resources; <strong>and</strong> programs, services <strong>and</strong> community<br />

development.<br />

From the key informant interviews, a list <strong>of</strong> priorities was<br />

extracted:<br />

• Facility Development <strong>Plan</strong>;<br />

• Growth Management (for facilities, services <strong>and</strong> staffing);<br />

• Diversity <strong>and</strong> inclusion;<br />

• Accessibility for persons with disabilities;<br />

• An all‐encompassing environmental strategy;<br />

• Trails <strong>and</strong> pathways;<br />

• Community safety;<br />

• Youth engagement;<br />

• Physical Activity Strategy; <strong>and</strong><br />

• Staff resources.<br />

diversity <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Town</strong>, improving affordability <strong>of</strong> activities,<br />

provision <strong>of</strong> more age‐specific pursuits, etc.<br />

2.2.6 Public Open Houses & Meetings<br />

Public open houses <strong>and</strong> meetings were held in March 2008.<br />

These sessions were designed to present the findings <strong>of</strong> the draft<br />

<strong>Master</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> to stakeholders <strong>and</strong> the general public in order to<br />

solicit their feedback. The input obtained through the open<br />

houses <strong>and</strong> meetings will be considered when finalizing the<br />

<strong>Master</strong> <strong>Plan</strong>.<br />

Workshops with municipal staff were also held in advanced stages<br />

<strong>of</strong> the master planning process to confirm general directions,<br />

provide feedback on recommended action plans <strong>and</strong> establish<br />

priorities to guide implementation.<br />

2.2.5 Online Feedback<br />

An online questionnaire was been posted on the <strong>Town</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Ajax</strong><br />

website for the duration <strong>of</strong> the master planning process in order<br />

to gather comments from the general public surrounding their<br />

perceptions on the state <strong>of</strong> recreation <strong>and</strong> cultural services.<br />

Comments for improvement were wide‐ranging <strong>and</strong> included the<br />

desire for facilities in new neighbourhoods, better reflecting the<br />

2.3 Community Demographics<br />

The <strong>Town</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Ajax</strong> demographic pr<strong>of</strong>ile is a critical factor used to<br />

determine future facility <strong>and</strong> program‐specific needs. By<br />

underst<strong>and</strong>ing who lives here now <strong>and</strong> how that will differ in the<br />

future, the <strong>Town</strong> can begin to form a picture <strong>of</strong> the types <strong>and</strong><br />

scope <strong>of</strong> services <strong>and</strong> facilities which are required to meet<br />

community needs over the life <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Master</strong> <strong>Plan</strong>.<br />

MONTEITH BROWN PLANNING CONSULTANTS in association with Tucker‐Reid & Associates & The JF Group<br />

April 2008<br />

Page 13


<strong>Master</strong> <strong>Plan</strong>ning Context<br />

The following key demographic points are important to consider<br />

in the context <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Town</strong>’s recreation, parks <strong>and</strong> cultural system:<br />

Figure 3: Historical <strong>and</strong> Projected Population, 2001‐2021<br />

• <strong>Ajax</strong> has experienced considerable population growth in<br />

recent years, growing from 64,430 residents in 1996 to a<br />

2006 population <strong>of</strong> 90,167 (40% increase). 1 Current<br />

estimates place the <strong>Town</strong>’s population at 93,553 at the<br />

end <strong>of</strong> the year 2007.<br />

• The <strong>Town</strong>’s current (2007) population is estimated to be<br />

93,553 – by 2021, the population is forecasted to grow to<br />

125,589 (or 34%) as shown in Figure 3. 2<br />

• <strong>Ajax</strong> reflects a fairly young age pr<strong>of</strong>ile compared to many<br />

other communities – this trend will continue as the<br />

number <strong>of</strong> younger adults will increase by 52% by the<br />

year 2021 – the number <strong>of</strong> older adults above 55 years,<br />

however, is poised to more than double (109% growth<br />

rate). This means a great variety <strong>of</strong> active <strong>and</strong> passive<br />

opportunities will be sought out.<br />

• Already an extremely ethnically diverse community, <strong>Ajax</strong><br />

will continue to diversify as the region remains a popular<br />

destination for new Canadians, thus creating a need for<br />

new <strong>and</strong> non‐traditional types <strong>of</strong> services <strong>and</strong> facilities.<br />

• A link exists between level <strong>of</strong> income <strong>and</strong> participation in<br />

leisure activities – with the 2001 Census recording aboveaverage<br />

incomes in <strong>Ajax</strong>, it can be expected that higher<br />

levels <strong>of</strong> services are required.<br />

• It will also be important to continue to provide programs<br />

<strong>and</strong> services that are affordable to the general<br />

population in order to ensure that access to recreation<br />

<strong>and</strong> cultural opportunities is equitable for a range <strong>of</strong><br />

residents.<br />

1 Statistics Canada Census, 1996, 2001.<br />

2<br />

Conforms to forecasts prepared by Monteith Brown <strong>Plan</strong>ning<br />

Consultants <strong>and</strong> Watson & Associates Economists. 2007.<br />

Source: Statistics Canada, 2001; Monteith Brown <strong>Plan</strong>ning Consultants, 2007<br />

2.4 Trends in <strong>Recreation</strong>, <strong>Parks</strong> & <strong>Culture</strong><br />

As with demographics, an underst<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>of</strong> pertinent trends<br />

assists in developing strategies to address future directions<br />

pertaining to facility <strong>and</strong> programming requirements. By being<br />

aware <strong>of</strong> trends specific to demographics, participation <strong>and</strong><br />

facility development, the <strong>Town</strong> will be in a position to anticipate<br />

shifts in dem<strong>and</strong> for leisure opportunities.<br />

Key Lifestyle Trends<br />

• High levels <strong>of</strong> physical inactivity <strong>and</strong> obesity are being<br />

observed across the country, largely due to a lack <strong>of</strong> time<br />

<strong>and</strong> participation in more sedentary forms <strong>of</strong> leisure (i.e.<br />

watching television, online activities, etc.) in free time.<br />

• In order to facilitate healthy lifestyles, all levels <strong>of</strong><br />

government are examining ways to increase physical<br />

MONTEITH BROWN PLANNING CONSULTANTS in association with Tucker‐Reid & Associates & The JF Group<br />

April 2008<br />

Page 14


<strong>Master</strong> <strong>Plan</strong>ning Context<br />

activity <strong>and</strong> participation levels through the introduction<br />

<strong>of</strong> programs, funding <strong>and</strong> other initiatives.<br />

General Trends in the Leisure System<br />

• Income is a significant barrier to participation in leisure<br />

pursuits – a person’s ability to pay needs to be<br />

considered by municipalities when delivering leisure<br />

services.<br />

• Dem<strong>and</strong> for unorganized <strong>and</strong> drop‐in activities is on the<br />

rise, at the expense <strong>of</strong> most organized <strong>and</strong> structured<br />

programs which are inflexible to those with limited free<br />

time.<br />

• The “multi‐use” facility concept is being increasingly<br />

viewed as the preferred development model as it<br />

consolidates a number <strong>of</strong> leisure activities at a single<br />

location, thus providing a “one‐stop shopping” venue for<br />

time pressed individuals, <strong>of</strong>fers cross‐programming<br />

opportunities for a wide range <strong>of</strong> ages, <strong>and</strong> reduces<br />

municipal operational costs.<br />

• Municipalities are entering into partnerships with<br />

community <strong>and</strong> private‐sector organizations to maximize<br />

efficiencies associated with capital <strong>and</strong> operational costs.<br />

• Volunteerism is in decline across the country, therefore<br />

supporting local volunteers is critical to ensuring that<br />

these dedicated individuals continue to participate in<br />

civic life <strong>and</strong> that new volunteers can be recruited.<br />

Key Trends in Sports & <strong>Recreation</strong><br />

• Adults <strong>and</strong> older adults are embracing the “active living”<br />

or “wellness” philosophy, thus municipalities are<br />

orienting their programming to respond to these<br />

dem<strong>and</strong>s.<br />

• Trails (both nature <strong>and</strong> paved) continue to be one <strong>of</strong> the<br />

most dem<strong>and</strong> “facilities” as walking for leisure, cycling,<br />

inline skating, etc. are all popular forms <strong>of</strong> leisure.<br />

• Fewer children <strong>and</strong> youth are participating in most<br />

organized sports (soccer <strong>and</strong> girls hockey are notable<br />

exceptions), rather choosing to pursue casual activities<br />

on their own schedule.<br />

• Arena sports (i.e. hockey, ringette, etc.) continue to be in<br />

dem<strong>and</strong>, with shortages in prime time ice hours observed<br />

across the province.<br />

• Sport <strong>and</strong> nature‐based tourism represents a growing<br />

market, thus necessitating a focus on family recreation<br />

<strong>and</strong> “destination” facilities, as well as passive outdoor<br />

sports <strong>and</strong> activities such as golf, hiking, bird watching,<br />

etc.<br />

MONTEITH BROWN PLANNING CONSULTANTS in association with Tucker‐Reid & Associates & The JF Group<br />

April 2008<br />

Page 15


<strong>Master</strong> <strong>Plan</strong>ning Context<br />

Key Trends in <strong>Parks</strong><br />

• People want to live near parks <strong>and</strong> open spaces as they<br />

are associated with a higher quality <strong>of</strong> life.<br />

• <strong>Parks</strong> are increasingly viewed as an opportunity for nonprogrammed<br />

recreation <strong>and</strong> culture activities, <strong>and</strong> can<br />

accommodate facilities targeted for all ages.<br />

• Dem<strong>and</strong>s have been observed for gathering areas such as<br />

public picnicking areas, outdoor barbeques, etc.,<br />

particularly in communities with diverse ethnic<br />

populations.<br />

• As people become increasingly aware <strong>of</strong> benefits related<br />

to environmental protection, the integration <strong>of</strong><br />

environmental features into active parks is becoming<br />

more apparent.<br />

• Education <strong>and</strong> public awareness <strong>of</strong> environmental <strong>and</strong><br />

park‐specific issues are forming components <strong>of</strong> resource<br />

management strategies.<br />

• Research has been focused towards community‐based<br />

forms <strong>of</strong> art experiences that engage residents to<br />

collaboratively participate in the arts.<br />

• Models encouraging participation in the arts for specific<br />

age groups such as youth (e.g. urban art) <strong>and</strong> seniors to<br />

stimulate creative thought.<br />

• A reduced focus <strong>of</strong> the arts within the school curriculum<br />

is a challenge that may result in younger age groups not<br />

being introduced to arts‐based opportunities <strong>and</strong> may<br />

result in declining participation rates as they grow into<br />

adulthood.<br />

• Heritage preservation is a key component in developing<br />

liveable <strong>and</strong> creative cities by defining identity <strong>and</strong><br />

senses <strong>of</strong> place.<br />

• Cultural tourism opportunities are increasingly forming<br />

key components <strong>of</strong> economic development strategies<br />

being developed by municipalities.<br />

Key Trends in Arts & <strong>Culture</strong><br />

• Governments are recognizing the importance <strong>of</strong> culture<br />

<strong>and</strong> consider it an important part <strong>of</strong> developing a<br />

sustainable community. <strong>Culture</strong> has been referenced in<br />

strategic documents such as Places to Grow.<br />

• Absolute attendance figures for most arts <strong>and</strong> culture<br />

events have risen over the past two decades, however,<br />

these increases have not kept pace with population<br />

growth.<br />

• The Baby Boom generation may renew interest in the<br />

arts <strong>and</strong> cultural sector due to a higher level <strong>of</strong> free time<br />

(as they retire) <strong>and</strong> disposable income.<br />

MONTEITH BROWN PLANNING CONSULTANTS in association with Tucker‐Reid & Associates & The JF Group<br />

April 2008<br />

Page 16


<strong>Recreation</strong>, <strong>Parks</strong> & <strong>Culture</strong> Facilities<br />

Chapter 3: <strong>Recreation</strong>, <strong>Parks</strong> & <strong>Culture</strong> Facilities<br />

3.1 Methodology<br />

The <strong>Recreation</strong>, <strong>Parks</strong> & <strong>Culture</strong> <strong>Master</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> has utilized a<br />

complex methodology to evaluate the need for facilities <strong>and</strong><br />

services to be <strong>of</strong>fered by the <strong>Town</strong>. Supply <strong>and</strong> dem<strong>and</strong><br />

calculations are rooted in local demographics, prominent leisure<br />

trends, consultations with the community, municipal service<br />

delivery mechanisms <strong>and</strong> application <strong>of</strong> service‐level targets.<br />

The chart below illustrates some <strong>of</strong> the key inputs <strong>and</strong> outputs<br />

used to evaluate facility <strong>and</strong> parkl<strong>and</strong> needs (although there are<br />

other considerations such as alignment with corporate objectives,<br />

potential partnership opportunities, etc. which are used in the<br />

needs assessments as well as what is identified below).<br />

MONTEITH BROWN PLANNING CONSULTANTS in association with Tucker‐Reid & Associates & The JF Group<br />

April 2008<br />

Page 17


<strong>Recreation</strong>, <strong>Parks</strong> & <strong>Culture</strong> Facilities<br />

Needs are assessed using methodologies involving market‐driven<br />

<strong>and</strong> population‐based (per‐capita) targets. Program statistics<br />

have utilized data from the 2006 Municipal Performance<br />

Measures Program.<br />

Market‐driven targets (e.g., 1 soccer field per “x” active soccer<br />

participants) are used to provide an accurate indication <strong>of</strong><br />

dem<strong>and</strong> for facilities that are largely registration‐based. Per<br />

capita targets (e.g., 1 indoor pool per “x” residents) are not always<br />

able to account for socio‐economic or cultural differences among<br />

diverse communities, but can be useful for <strong>Town</strong>‐wide facilities<br />

<strong>and</strong> when comparing levels <strong>of</strong> service with other municipalities.<br />

• Historical increases in growth;<br />

• Evidence <strong>of</strong> latent dem<strong>and</strong> (e.g. waiting lists);<br />

• Usage patterns <strong>and</strong> capacity available at existing venues;<br />

• Appropriate <strong>and</strong> equitable geo‐spatial distribution (i.e.<br />

where facilities should go);<br />

• Capacity <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Town</strong> to fund, operate <strong>and</strong> maintain.<br />

Table 1 <strong>and</strong> Table 2 provide a summary <strong>of</strong> all provision targets<br />

established for appropriate facility types.<br />

Inventory data considers only municipal assets located on<br />

parkl<strong>and</strong> owned by the <strong>Town</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Ajax</strong>, <strong>and</strong> is considered to be<br />

accurate as <strong>of</strong> January 15, 2008. Reference has been made to<br />

certain school facilities, where appropriate.<br />

Action <strong>Plan</strong>:<br />

The <strong>Town</strong> should utilize targets in conjunction with other<br />

important factors, including trends, spatial <strong>and</strong> usage<br />

data, degree <strong>of</strong> “pent‐up” dem<strong>and</strong>, <strong>and</strong> population<br />

growth in respective age groups to make informed<br />

decisions pertaining to facility‐based dem<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> before<br />

finalizing capital investment.<br />

Targets should not necessarily be considered as steadfast<br />

st<strong>and</strong>ards, rather they represent a point where the <strong>Town</strong> needs to<br />

consider the justification <strong>and</strong> priority <strong>of</strong> additional investment in<br />

specific facilities, based upon whether or not the facility in<br />

question is optimally used <strong>and</strong> if latent/growth‐related dem<strong>and</strong> is<br />

present, etc. For example, after achieving a target the <strong>Town</strong><br />

should consider including (but not limiting itself to) the following<br />

criteria prior to confirming the need for new facilities:<br />

MONTEITH BROWN PLANNING CONSULTANTS in association with Tucker‐Reid & Associates & The JF Group<br />

April 2008<br />

Page 18


<strong>Recreation</strong>, <strong>Parks</strong> & <strong>Culture</strong> Facilities<br />

3.2 Indoor <strong>Recreation</strong> Facilities<br />

The following table summarizes indoor recreation facility requirements according to<br />

needs assessments conducted as part <strong>of</strong> the master planning process. For detailed<br />

technical information <strong>and</strong> analyses, please refer to the Needs Assessment Report which<br />

serves as a background document to this <strong>Master</strong> <strong>Plan</strong>.<br />

Table 1: Indoor <strong>Recreation</strong> Facility Needs, 2007‐2021<br />

Indoor Facility Type Recommended Provision Target Municipal<br />

Supply<br />

(2007)<br />

Multi‐Use Community<br />

Centres<br />

Market Dependent (no target recommended)<br />

Current<br />

Dem<strong>and</strong><br />

(2007)<br />

Current<br />

Surplus<br />

(Deficit)<br />

Future<br />

Dem<strong>and</strong><br />

(2021)<br />

See analysis contained in this Section<br />

Future<br />

Surplus<br />

(Deficit)<br />

Ice Rinks 1 Ice Rink per 800 registered participants 5 5.2 (0.2) 6.3 (1.3)<br />

Indoor Aquatics 1 Indoor Aquatics Centre per 40,000 residents 2 2.3 (0.3) 3.1 (1.1)<br />

Gymnasiums 1 Gymnasium per 50,000 residents 1 1.9 (0.9) 2.5 (1.5)<br />

Multi‐Purpose Rooms Market Dependent (no target recommended) See analysis contained in this Section<br />

Older Adult Space Market Dependent (no target recommended) See analysis contained in this Section<br />

Youth Leisure Space Market Dependent (no target recommended) See analysis contained in this Section<br />

Training Clubs Market Dependent (no target recommended) See analysis contained in this Section<br />

Indoor Turf Market Dependent (no target recommended) See analysis contained in this Section<br />

Note: Projected populations for the years 2007 <strong>and</strong> 2021 are 93,553 <strong>and</strong> 125,589 respectively<br />

MONTEITH BROWN PLANNING CONSULTANTS in association with Tucker‐Reid & Associates & The JF Group<br />

April 2008<br />

Page 19


<strong>Recreation</strong>, <strong>Parks</strong> & <strong>Culture</strong> Facilities<br />

Multi‐Use Community Centres<br />

The <strong>Town</strong>’s premier multi‐use<br />

recreation complexes consist <strong>of</strong><br />

the <strong>Ajax</strong> Community Centre<br />

(ACC) <strong>and</strong> the McLean<br />

Community Centre (MCC). Both<br />

facilities contain a range <strong>of</strong><br />

major facility components<br />

between them including indoor<br />

pools, ice pads (ACC only),<br />

gymnasia (MCC only), fitness<br />

centres, youth rooms, etc.<br />

Based on needs assessments<br />

articulated throughout the rest<br />

<strong>of</strong> this Section, the following components are recommended for<br />

inclusion in the design <strong>of</strong> a new multi‐use community centre:<br />

• ice pads (2)<br />

• indoor aquatics<br />

• full gymnasium<br />

• multi‐purpose community<br />

<strong>and</strong> program space<br />

• fitness studio<br />

• older adult leisure space<br />

• youth leisure space<br />

• preschool programming space<br />

As will be explained through the rest <strong>of</strong> this Section, there are also<br />

a number <strong>of</strong> facility components (i.e. equipment‐based fitness<br />

centre, child care centre, indoor turf, etc.) that may potentially be<br />

included pending further studies <strong>and</strong> development <strong>of</strong> appropriate<br />

partnership parameters.<br />

In addition to the indoor components listed above, the following<br />

outdoor facilities are recommended as part <strong>of</strong> the multi‐use<br />

centre site:<br />

• soccer fields<br />

• multi‐use field<br />

• multi‐use court<br />

• barrier‐free playground<br />

• splash pad<br />

Please note that the number <strong>and</strong> type <strong>of</strong> facilities included in the<br />

final site design is dependent upon site constraints or other<br />

mitigating factors.<br />

Initial observations suggest that the Sportsplex Park would be the<br />

most ideal site as the <strong>Town</strong> has already secured approximately 19<br />

hectares <strong>of</strong> additional l<strong>and</strong>s for the second phase <strong>of</strong> the park’s<br />

development (which should be sufficient for the facility <strong>and</strong>/or<br />

future expansion phases) <strong>and</strong> would service a rapidly growing<br />

area <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Town</strong>.<br />

Action <strong>Plan</strong>s:<br />

Based upon facility assessments conducted as part <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>Master</strong> <strong>Plan</strong>, one new multi‐use community centre will<br />

be required during the next five years, preferably to be<br />

located in north east <strong>Ajax</strong>.<br />

Prior to the development <strong>of</strong> each phase <strong>of</strong> the<br />

recommended multi‐use community centre, the <strong>Town</strong><br />

should conduct a feasibility, business plan <strong>and</strong> design<br />

study to verify that all the components recommended for<br />

the facility through this <strong>Master</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> are justified given<br />

the community characteristics <strong>and</strong> level <strong>of</strong> dem<strong>and</strong><br />

present at that time.<br />

In anticipation <strong>of</strong> l<strong>and</strong> acquisition challenges associated<br />

with the <strong>Town</strong>’s forthcoming projected build‐out, this<br />

multi‐use facility should be sited <strong>and</strong> designed in a<br />

manner that allows future expansion should additional<br />

recreation or leisure components be required in the longterm.<br />

New facilities, where feasible, should be designed<br />

according to LEED or equivalent st<strong>and</strong>ards <strong>and</strong><br />

incorporate “green” technologies to showcase the<br />

<strong>Town</strong>’s leadership role in energy efficiency <strong>and</strong><br />

environmental stewardship.<br />

MONTEITH BROWN PLANNING CONSULTANTS in association with Tucker‐Reid & Associates & The JF Group<br />

April 2008<br />

Page 20


<strong>Recreation</strong>, <strong>Parks</strong> & <strong>Culture</strong> Facilities<br />

Ice Rinks / Arenas<br />

<strong>Ajax</strong> is presently served by a total <strong>of</strong> five ice rinks at two municipal<br />

arenas. The Village Arena, located on Church Street in the<br />

Pickering Village, was constructed in 1974 as a single rink arena<br />

while the <strong>Ajax</strong> Community Centre (ACC) contains four ice rinks.<br />

Data suggests that ice is being utilized effectively at municipal<br />

arenas. In fact, a slight surplus <strong>of</strong> prime time ice was observed<br />

during the 2007 season, however, past utilization trends suggest<br />

that prime time ice bookings are on the rise. Research suggests<br />

that there were approximately 4,170 registered ice sport<br />

participants for the 2007 season.<br />

Application <strong>of</strong> a 1 ice rink per 800 registered participant service<br />

target suggests that one new ice rink would be required around<br />

the year 2016. The <strong>Town</strong> would be best suited to developing a<br />

twin‐pad arena to meet future needs, particularly as the aging ice<br />

rink at the Village Arena will also need to be replaced.<br />

Action <strong>Plan</strong>s:<br />

A twin pad arena is recommended for development as<br />

part <strong>of</strong> the second phase <strong>of</strong> construction at a new multiuse<br />

community complex that would preferably be<br />

situated at Sportsplex Park.<br />

The Village Arena should be decommissioned <strong>and</strong><br />

repurposed to another use once the new twin pad arena<br />

becomes operational.<br />

The <strong>Recreation</strong> Services Department should collect<br />

registration data from local ice sport organizations on an<br />

annual basis <strong>and</strong> re‐apply the service level target prior to<br />

the design <strong>and</strong> construction <strong>of</strong> new arena facilities in<br />

order to ensure sufficient dem<strong>and</strong> exists.<br />

Indoor Aquatics<br />

There are two municipal indoor pool locations in <strong>Ajax</strong> (there are<br />

also a number <strong>of</strong> outdoor aquatic facilities which are discussed in<br />

Section 3.4). The McLean Community Centre contains a leisure<br />

style 25 metre pool with<br />

a large water slide, tot<br />

pool <strong>and</strong> on‐deck sauna<br />

<strong>and</strong> whirlpool. The <strong>Ajax</strong><br />

Community Centre<br />

contains a st<strong>and</strong>ard 25<br />

metre pool. According to<br />

municipal statistics,<br />

there appears to be a<br />

substantial degree <strong>of</strong><br />

latent dem<strong>and</strong> for<br />

indoor aquatics, largely<br />

for children’s learn‐toswim<br />

programs as<br />

evidenced by waiting lists. The number <strong>of</strong> registrations for indoor<br />

aquatics has also been increasing, however, this may be<br />

constrained by limited pool times at peak usage hours.<br />

Given the observed dem<strong>and</strong> for aquatic programs <strong>and</strong> the<br />

pressures apparent for existing peak pool times, it is<br />

recommended that the <strong>Town</strong> slightly increase its level <strong>of</strong> service<br />

<strong>and</strong> target the provision <strong>of</strong> indoor aquatic facilities at a rate <strong>of</strong> 1<br />

indoor aquatic facility per 40,000 residents. This target would<br />

necessitate the provision <strong>of</strong> a third indoor aquatic facility by the<br />

year 2016.<br />

With a multi‐use recreation facility currently targeted for 2011,<br />

the inclusion <strong>of</strong> an indoor aquatic centre appears to be justifiable,<br />

despite the fact that the recommended service target assumes it<br />

would not be used until capacity five years later. It is believed<br />

that significant latent dem<strong>and</strong> exists in higher revenue program<br />

streams (i.e. lessons) <strong>and</strong> that the facility would attract greater<br />

degree <strong>of</strong> use among residents living in newly developing areas.<br />

MONTEITH BROWN PLANNING CONSULTANTS in association with Tucker‐Reid & Associates & The JF Group<br />

April 2008<br />

Page 21


<strong>Recreation</strong>, <strong>Parks</strong> & <strong>Culture</strong> Facilities<br />

Furthermore, the provision <strong>of</strong> a warm‐water therapeutic pool may<br />

serve a number <strong>of</strong> health‐related <strong>and</strong> wellness functions (e.g.<br />

physiotherapy, various forms <strong>of</strong> rehabilitation, etc.), thus<br />

benefiting the needs <strong>of</strong> adults <strong>and</strong> older adults, while also <strong>of</strong>fering<br />

a service to residents with a disability or injury. Preliminary<br />

observations suggest that a therapeutic pool could possibly be<br />

located in the ACC solarium space; this site could possibly enlist<br />

the adjacent hospital as a partner which would maximize revenue<br />

generation in addition to other revenues that could be rented to<br />

third‐party fitness operators. A more feasible/cost‐effective<br />

option, however, would be to position the recommended pool at<br />

the new multi‐use community centre to be able to <strong>of</strong>fer<br />

therapeutic/rehabilitative opportunities.<br />

Use <strong>of</strong> the indoor pool at the McLean Community Centre would<br />

likely be reduced following a new indoor pool becoming<br />

operational, however, it is anticipated that the effects <strong>of</strong> the shift<br />

will be reduced as the <strong>Town</strong>’s population continues to grow.<br />

Action <strong>Plan</strong>s:<br />

Provision <strong>of</strong> a third indoor pool facility is recommended<br />

for inclusion as part <strong>of</strong> a new multi‐use community<br />

centre, preferably as part <strong>of</strong> the facility’s first phase <strong>of</strong><br />

development.<br />

The <strong>Town</strong> should consider the feasibility <strong>of</strong> providing a<br />

therapeutic pool in <strong>Ajax</strong> through a business planning<br />

process. In order to determine the most appropriate<br />

location for the therapeutic pool, this analysis should be<br />

conducted concurrently with the feasibility study for the<br />

multi‐use community centre.<br />

Multi‐Purpose Community & Program Spaces<br />

There are a number <strong>of</strong> meeting rooms, gathering areas <strong>and</strong><br />

banquet halls distributed at municipal facilities across <strong>Ajax</strong>. In<br />

addition, the <strong>Town</strong> anticipates the development <strong>of</strong> three new<br />

community facilities: the Waterfront East Community Pavilion, the<br />

Greenwood Park Pavilion <strong>and</strong> a facility at a community school<br />

(pending the development <strong>of</strong> an agreement <strong>and</strong> site selection<br />

with the school board), all <strong>of</strong> which may contribute additional<br />

multi‐purpose spaces to the municipal supply.<br />

Program utilization statistics suggest that registration in municipal<br />

leisure programs is growing, <strong>and</strong> will continue to do so as <strong>Ajax</strong>’s<br />

population increases into the future. Numerous municipal<br />

programs <strong>and</strong> services are <strong>of</strong>fered out <strong>of</strong> multi‐purpose program<br />

spaces located at existing venues such as the community centres,<br />

Rotary Park Pavilion, community schools, etc. With apparent<br />

dem<strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> these spaces for community functions also placing<br />

pressure on existing facilities, a need exists for additional spaces<br />

capable <strong>of</strong> hosting a variety <strong>of</strong> municipal <strong>and</strong> community events.<br />

To alleviate pressures on existing facilities, as well as to create<br />

high quality community <strong>and</strong> <strong>Town</strong>‐wide destination facilities, it is<br />

recommended that meeting spaces be provided at the new multiuse<br />

community centre, a Waterfront East Community Pavilion, a<br />

Greenwood Park Pavilion (see Section 3.5), a new community<br />

school, <strong>and</strong>/or where other appropriate opportunities may exist.<br />

Action <strong>Plan</strong>s:<br />

Include flexible community <strong>and</strong> program spaces as part<br />

<strong>of</strong> the design template for all appropriate communityoriented<br />

facilities, including the new multi‐use<br />

community centre. These spaces should be designed to<br />

accommodate multiple purposes, to the greatest extent<br />

possible.<br />

Proceed with the development <strong>of</strong> the Waterfront East<br />

Community Pavilion to provide an anchor point for the<br />

eastern end <strong>of</strong> waterfront. This facility should contain<br />

functional program space as well as amenities catered to<br />

the convenience <strong>and</strong> enjoyment <strong>of</strong> trail users <strong>and</strong><br />

tourists to the waterfront.<br />

MONTEITH BROWN PLANNING CONSULTANTS in association with Tucker‐Reid & Associates & The JF Group<br />

April 2008<br />

Page 22


<strong>Recreation</strong>, <strong>Parks</strong> & <strong>Culture</strong> Facilities<br />

In order to address service gaps pertaining to meeting<br />

spaces in <strong>Ajax</strong>’s northern <strong>and</strong>/or southeast quadrants,<br />

the <strong>Town</strong> should consider investing in the development<br />

<strong>of</strong> meeting spaces <strong>and</strong>/or gymnasiums at proposed<br />

community schools, <strong>and</strong>/or any other new school<br />

developments.<br />

Older Adult Space<br />

Dedicated spaces for seniors are currently provided at the St.<br />

Andrews Community Centre <strong>and</strong> the Village Community Centre.<br />

Given the tremendous growth forecasted for the older adult<br />

population, additional seniors space will undoubtedly be required<br />

if the <strong>Town</strong> is to adequately service the needs <strong>of</strong> this market. This<br />

may necessitate the expansion <strong>of</strong> existing seniors facilities as well<br />

as the development <strong>of</strong> new venues for older adults to congregate<br />

<strong>and</strong> participate in leisurely pursuits. It should be noted that it is<br />

now considered best practice to provide older adult leisure spaces<br />

which <strong>of</strong>fer multiple uses <strong>and</strong> diversified programming<br />

opportunities rather than single purpose, dedicated seniors hall<br />

facilities.<br />

The design <strong>of</strong> new or<br />

upgraded older adult<br />

facilities may consist <strong>of</strong><br />

fitness <strong>and</strong> wellness<br />

studios, arts <strong>and</strong> crafts<br />

areas, games room,<br />

reading <strong>and</strong>/or multimedia<br />

areas, social<br />

lounges <strong>and</strong> other<br />

amenities. The <strong>Town</strong><br />

would be best suited to<br />

consult with existing<br />

senior’s clubs <strong>and</strong><br />

newly retired residents in <strong>Ajax</strong> to find a way to provide spaces<br />

that meet the evolving needs <strong>of</strong> their membership. Through their<br />

design, new <strong>and</strong> existing facilities should be evaluated for their<br />

ability to accommodate a range <strong>of</strong> active <strong>and</strong> sedentary uses.<br />

Action <strong>Plan</strong>s:<br />

The <strong>Town</strong> should continually evaluate opportunities to<br />

exp<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong>/or add dedicated older adult areas to<br />

existing community recreation <strong>and</strong> leisure facilities. In<br />

doing so, the <strong>Town</strong> should consult with local seniors’<br />

clubs in the design <strong>of</strong> exp<strong>and</strong>ed or older adult‐oriented<br />

facilities in order to ensure that local needs are<br />

considered in a manner that encourages a high degree <strong>of</strong><br />

use through principles <strong>of</strong> inclusion <strong>and</strong> accessibility.<br />

St. Andrew’s Community Centre should be exp<strong>and</strong>ed<br />

(through linking the two separated buildings) to<br />

accommodate a wider range <strong>of</strong> older adult‐specific<br />

needs, particularly through the inclusion <strong>of</strong> active living<br />

space. This will create a centralized hub for older adult<br />

programming in <strong>Ajax</strong> <strong>and</strong> should incorporate spaces for a<br />

range <strong>of</strong> active <strong>and</strong> passive opportunities to be pursued.<br />

Exp<strong>and</strong>ed <strong>and</strong> revitalized space at St. Andrews will not<br />

only be <strong>of</strong> benefit to older adults using the facility but<br />

will also increase the capacity for community recreational<br />

programming, private rentals <strong>and</strong> support the uses <strong>of</strong> the<br />

current tenant, the <strong>Ajax</strong>/Pickering Navy League Branch. It<br />

is recommended that the <strong>Town</strong> undertake a full<br />

consultation approach with all existing users to ensure<br />

plans meet current <strong>and</strong> future anticipated need.<br />

A dedicated older adult space should be included as part<br />

<strong>of</strong> the design for a new multi‐use community centre,<br />

preferably as part <strong>of</strong> the facility’s second phase <strong>of</strong><br />

development.<br />

A focus should continue to be placed upon enhancing the<br />

service delivery model for older adults through the<br />

development <strong>of</strong> innovative, inclusive <strong>and</strong> accessible<br />

programs focusing on wellness <strong>and</strong> active living.<br />

MONTEITH BROWN PLANNING CONSULTANTS in association with Tucker‐Reid & Associates & The JF Group<br />

April 2008<br />

Page 23


<strong>Recreation</strong>, <strong>Parks</strong> & <strong>Culture</strong> Facilities<br />

Child & Youth Leisure Space<br />

Two municipal youth rooms (located at the McLean Community<br />

Centre <strong>and</strong> the <strong>Ajax</strong> Community Centre) are provided in <strong>Ajax</strong> for<br />

those between 12 <strong>and</strong> 18 years <strong>of</strong> age.<br />

The youth rooms at the ACC <strong>and</strong> MCC appear to be generally well<br />

utilized <strong>and</strong> benefit from their central locations <strong>and</strong> proximity to<br />

other recreational activities. It should be noted that while visits to<br />

the drop‐in rooms have decreased in recent years, staff are<br />

currently observing increasing levels <strong>of</strong> use partly due to the<br />

enhancement <strong>of</strong> the facilities with the infusion <strong>of</strong> corporate<br />

sponsorship <strong>and</strong> other funding sources.<br />

The development <strong>of</strong> youth spaces should focus upon providing a<br />

range <strong>of</strong> recreation <strong>and</strong> resource‐based opportunities. Youth<br />

should be engaged in the design <strong>and</strong> operation <strong>of</strong> drop‐in<br />

facilities, thereby empowering them, facilitating positive<br />

leadership skills <strong>and</strong> creating a sense <strong>of</strong> ownership in the facility.<br />

Youth facilities should be provided in areas that are highly<br />

accessible, such as those serviced by public transit or near bicycle<br />

paths.<br />

Youth spaces should also incorporate sufficient areas for arts <strong>and</strong><br />

cultural activities, which are channels for creative <strong>and</strong> personal<br />

expression opportunities that youth are consistently seeking. Arts<br />

<strong>and</strong> cultural activities for youth are much different than activities<br />

traditionally programmed (which responded typically to more<br />

adult‐oriented interests), <strong>and</strong> include opportunities such as urban<br />

art, spoken art, musical expression, etc.<br />

Action <strong>Plan</strong>s:<br />

The <strong>Town</strong> should incorporate dedicated youth leisure<br />

spaces as part <strong>of</strong> the design for a new multi‐use<br />

community centre, preferably as part <strong>of</strong> the facility’s first<br />

phase <strong>of</strong> development.<br />

The <strong>Town</strong> should prepare a feasibility study <strong>and</strong> business<br />

plan to determine whether or not municipal investment<br />

is warranted in a st<strong>and</strong>‐alone youth facility, if an<br />

appropriate site is secured. In particular, the feasibility<br />

study should examine whether or not the st<strong>and</strong>‐alone<br />

facility would duplicate existing facilities <strong>and</strong> services<br />

<strong>of</strong>fered at existing municipal <strong>and</strong> community‐based<br />

venues.<br />

The <strong>Town</strong> should endeavour to facilitate a youth‐friendly<br />

atmosphere at all municipal youth facilities by continuing<br />

to provide appropriate training for municipal staff <strong>and</strong><br />

involving youth in the decision‐making processes<br />

throughout the design phase <strong>and</strong> facility operation.<br />

The <strong>Town</strong> should conduct its Youth Survey (or similar<br />

consultation tool) every five years to ensure that it is well<br />

positioned to respond to youth‐specific needs <strong>and</strong><br />

concerns.<br />

MONTEITH BROWN PLANNING CONSULTANTS in association with Tucker‐Reid & Associates & The JF Group<br />

April 2008<br />

Page 24


<strong>Recreation</strong>, <strong>Parks</strong> & <strong>Culture</strong> Facilities<br />

Preschool / Early Childhood Development Rooms<br />

The <strong>Town</strong> provides supervised drop‐in spaces for children up to<br />

the age <strong>of</strong> 10 at the <strong>Ajax</strong> Community Centre (Little Friends<br />

program room) <strong>and</strong> the McLean Community Centre.<br />

As part <strong>of</strong> the new multi‐use facility, the <strong>Town</strong> should <strong>of</strong>fer<br />

preschool programming rooms similar to the model employed at<br />

the MCC <strong>and</strong> ACC. The provision <strong>of</strong> drop‐in children’s facilities is<br />

seen as a beneficial component <strong>of</strong> a community centre as the lack<br />

<strong>of</strong> child supervision can be a barrier to participation for certain<br />

facility users (i.e. parents who do not have access to child<br />

supervision services).<br />

lifestyles. The <strong>Town</strong>’s training clubs are well positioned to<br />

respond to these dem<strong>and</strong>s through the availability <strong>of</strong> equipment<br />

<strong>and</strong> studio‐type spaces. Even though the private sector has<br />

become the leader in providing fitness centres <strong>and</strong> training clubs,<br />

it is recommended that the <strong>Town</strong> continue its role in providing<br />

affordable <strong>and</strong> differentiated fitness facilities so that residents<br />

continue to have a choice <strong>of</strong> where to engage in their fitness<br />

activities.<br />

Action <strong>Plan</strong>s:<br />

The provision <strong>of</strong> preschool programming rooms at new<br />

leisure facilities is encouraged so that the inability to find<br />

suitable child supervision does not become a barrier to<br />

the participation <strong>of</strong> caregivers in municipal leisure<br />

programs, while also providing opportunities for early<br />

childhood development.<br />

Training Clubs / Fitness Studios<br />

Two municipal training clubs are <strong>of</strong>fered at the McLean<br />

Community Centre <strong>and</strong> the <strong>Ajax</strong> Community Centre. Both facilities<br />

are fully equipped with exercise machines <strong>and</strong> cater to weighttraining<br />

<strong>and</strong> aerobic fitness. These community centres also<br />

contain fitness studios with wood‐sprung floors that<br />

accommodate active living <strong>and</strong> wellness programming. The ACC<br />

also <strong>of</strong>fers four squash courts which are available for use by the<br />

general public <strong>and</strong> for club play.<br />

Given trends towards active living (i.e. the integration <strong>of</strong> physical<br />

activities into an individual’s daily routine), the <strong>Town</strong> should<br />

continue to exp<strong>and</strong> its focus, over time, on such programs that<br />

facilitate health benefits associated with physically active<br />

Active living opportunities appeal to a great number <strong>of</strong> older <strong>and</strong><br />

younger adults as well as the teenage market. For example, the<br />

health‐related benefits <strong>of</strong> spiritual‐based fitness (e.g. yoga, tai chi,<br />

dance, etc.) have been well documented <strong>and</strong> have been observed<br />

to be popular from the teenage to senior years. The <strong>Town</strong> should<br />

also consider active living opportunities in outdoor spaces such as<br />

parks by incorporating appropriate features (e.g. stretching<br />

stations, exercise zones, jogging loops, self guided walking trails,<br />

etc.) in those particular settings.<br />

Action <strong>Plan</strong>s:<br />

The <strong>Town</strong> should prepare a business plan to determine<br />

the feasibility <strong>of</strong> including a training club as part <strong>of</strong> a new<br />

multi‐use community centre.<br />

MONTEITH BROWN PLANNING CONSULTANTS in association with Tucker‐Reid & Associates & The JF Group<br />

April 2008<br />

Page 25


<strong>Recreation</strong>, <strong>Parks</strong> & <strong>Culture</strong> Facilities<br />

As part <strong>of</strong> a new multi‐use community centre, the <strong>Town</strong><br />

should include an active living studio <strong>and</strong> an indoor<br />

walking track to encourage physical activity during all<br />

seasons <strong>and</strong> among all age groups.<br />

The <strong>Town</strong> should include a small‐scale fitness facility at<br />

the St. Andrew’s Community Centre that is specifically for<br />

the use <strong>of</strong> the older adult population. At a minimum, this<br />

should include a studio space with wood‐sprung floors<br />

<strong>and</strong> sufficiently high ceilings to accommodate a range <strong>of</strong><br />

fitness programs.<br />

The <strong>Town</strong> should evaluate new <strong>and</strong> existing outdoor<br />

community spaces for their ability to accommodate<br />

active living <strong>and</strong> wellness programming opportunities as<br />

a means to add value to open spaces through<br />

encouraging passive recreation.<br />

The <strong>Town</strong> should continue to develop innovative <strong>and</strong><br />

interesting programs that will respond to the needs <strong>of</strong> its<br />

growing population, particularly the older adult market.<br />

The <strong>Town</strong> should also consider ways to engage residents<br />

<strong>of</strong> different ethnic backgrounds in order to encourage<br />

physical activities that appeal to a wide range <strong>of</strong><br />

residents.<br />

Gymnasiums<br />

The only municipally‐owned gymnasium is located at the McLean<br />

Community Centre, however, the <strong>Town</strong> facilitates community<br />

access to four community schools through an agreement with<br />

local school boards. A service target <strong>of</strong> 1 municipally‐owned<br />

gymnasium per 50,000 residents is sufficient to meet the needs <strong>of</strong><br />

the population <strong>and</strong> will allow the <strong>Town</strong> to maintain a degree <strong>of</strong><br />

authority over operations <strong>and</strong> scheduling (whereas this is not<br />

always possible in school‐owned gyms or shared facilities).<br />

Based on a 1:50,000 target, <strong>Ajax</strong> would require a second<br />

municipal gymnasium by the year 2009. It is recommended that<br />

the <strong>Town</strong> provide a municipal gymnasium at the new multi‐use<br />

community centre <strong>and</strong> even though this is expected to occur in<br />

2011, short‐term gymnasium needs are expected to be met<br />

through continued access to community schools.<br />

Action <strong>Plan</strong>s:<br />

The provision <strong>of</strong> a full gymnasium is recommended for<br />

inclusion as part <strong>of</strong> the first phase <strong>of</strong> development for the<br />

proposed multi‐use community centre. This would assist<br />

in augmenting programming opportunities at school<br />

gyms which may not otherwise be available for certain<br />

users.<br />

The <strong>Town</strong> should make every effort to maintain<br />

community access to school gyms to serve any<br />

neighbourhood‐level dem<strong>and</strong>s.<br />

Indoor Turf<br />

The <strong>Town</strong> does not own or operate an indoor turf facility.<br />

Municipalities are increasingly entering into the realm <strong>of</strong><br />

providing indoor turf facilities due to the significant growth in<br />

indoor soccer, however, these facilities are not generally<br />

considered to be a st<strong>and</strong>ard level <strong>of</strong> service as <strong>of</strong> yet.<br />

MONTEITH BROWN PLANNING CONSULTANTS in association with Tucker‐Reid & Associates & The JF Group<br />

April 2008<br />

Page 26


<strong>Recreation</strong>, <strong>Parks</strong> & <strong>Culture</strong> Facilities<br />

Since indoor artificial turf centres are generally not yet a st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />

level <strong>of</strong> service for many municipalities, it is recommended that<br />

the <strong>Town</strong> explore the possibility <strong>of</strong> providing indoor turf as well as<br />

the municipality’s potential role in capital funding <strong>and</strong> operations.<br />

This will require a business planning exercise prior to the design <strong>of</strong><br />

the facility to confirm municipal role in delivering indoor turf,<br />

ensure that future dem<strong>and</strong> is sufficient to support municipal<br />

investment, solicit potential partners <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong>fer a funding strategy.<br />

Indoor turf centres are not only beneficial for indoor soccer<br />

programs but also can provide a venue for other activities such as<br />

football, lacrosse, lawn bowling, etc. Potential locations for such a<br />

facility could include the proposed multi‐use community centre or<br />

repurposing an appropriate existing municipal facility; the<br />

business planning exercise should confirm a location for this<br />

venue.<br />

strategic directions to strengthen the role that arts, culture <strong>and</strong><br />

heritage plays in enhancing the local quality <strong>of</strong> life.<br />

A key to advancing the objectives <strong>of</strong> the ICACP is to continue to<br />

work with, <strong>and</strong> assisting to build the capacity <strong>of</strong>, local arts <strong>and</strong><br />

cultural groups in order to maximize the facilities <strong>and</strong> services<br />

which presently exist <strong>and</strong> which may be created in the future.<br />

The creation <strong>of</strong> a funding strategy is recommended to support the<br />

development <strong>of</strong> arts <strong>and</strong> cultural programs, events <strong>and</strong> the<br />

acquisition <strong>of</strong> public art. Such an initiative would be <strong>of</strong> great<br />

benefit in developing <strong>and</strong> exp<strong>and</strong>ing the creative infrastructure <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Ajax</strong>.<br />

Action <strong>Plan</strong>s:<br />

The <strong>Town</strong> should undertake a business planning <strong>and</strong><br />

feasibility study prior to the design <strong>of</strong> the new multi‐use<br />

community centre to determine whether municipal<br />

investment in indoor turf at the new facility is justifiable<br />

from a dem<strong>and</strong>, financing <strong>and</strong> operating perspective. Site<br />

selection criteria should consider Sportsplex Park (<strong>and</strong><br />

any other appropriate sites) as possible venues for<br />

development.<br />

3.3 Arts, <strong>Culture</strong> & Heritage<br />

Arts & Cultural Policies<br />

The <strong>Town</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Ajax</strong> Official <strong>Plan</strong>, Corporate Strategic <strong>Plan</strong>, the<br />

Integrated Community Arts <strong>and</strong> Cultural <strong>Plan</strong> (ICACP) <strong>and</strong> the<br />

Pickering Village Urban Design & Heritage Study are the primary<br />

corporate documents guiding the provision <strong>of</strong> arts <strong>and</strong> culture in<br />

<strong>Ajax</strong>. These documents provide the <strong>Town</strong> with the authority <strong>and</strong><br />

The ICACP <strong>and</strong> Corporate Strategic <strong>Plan</strong> also identify a need to<br />

strengthen <strong>and</strong> incorporate public art, largely through the l<strong>and</strong><br />

development process. This would ideally involve the drafting <strong>of</strong> a<br />

Public Art Policy which would contain provisions for public art <strong>and</strong><br />

m<strong>and</strong>ate contributions for applications falling under Section 37 <strong>of</strong><br />

the <strong>Plan</strong>ning Act (increased height or density); such an initiative<br />

should also be supported by other funding mechanisms including<br />

(but not limited to) the creation <strong>of</strong> a public art reserve, a<br />

framework for soliciting resources from community‐based<br />

partners, etc.<br />

MONTEITH BROWN PLANNING CONSULTANTS in association with Tucker‐Reid & Associates & The JF Group<br />

April 2008<br />

Page 27


<strong>Recreation</strong>, <strong>Parks</strong> & <strong>Culture</strong> Facilities<br />

Action <strong>Plan</strong>s:<br />

The findings <strong>of</strong> the Pickering Village Urban Design &<br />

Heritage Study should support decisions surrounding the<br />

Village Central Area <strong>and</strong> possibly focus upon developing<br />

the area as a primary node for creative <strong>and</strong> cultural<br />

activity through ongoing investment <strong>and</strong> policy<br />

development.<br />

The development <strong>of</strong> a Public Art Policy is recommended<br />

to encourage the provision <strong>and</strong> promotion <strong>of</strong> public art in<br />

<strong>Ajax</strong>. Policies governing public art should also be<br />

included in the Official <strong>Plan</strong> at the time <strong>of</strong> its next<br />

revision to provide municipal direction in this matter.<br />

The <strong>Town</strong> should continue to implement the strategic<br />

directions contained in the Integrated Community Arts<br />

<strong>and</strong> Cultural <strong>Plan</strong> in order to facilitate a thriving<br />

environment for <strong>Ajax</strong>’s creative sector.<br />

The creation <strong>of</strong> a funding strategy to support the<br />

development <strong>of</strong> arts <strong>and</strong> cultural programs would be <strong>of</strong><br />

great benefit in developing <strong>and</strong> exp<strong>and</strong>ing the creative<br />

infrastructure <strong>of</strong> <strong>Ajax</strong>.<br />

Arts & Cultural Facilities<br />

The <strong>Town</strong> operates gallery space out <strong>of</strong> the Rotary Room Gallery<br />

(<strong>Ajax</strong> Public Library) <strong>and</strong> the McLean Community Centre’s atrium.<br />

Performance venues are <strong>of</strong>fered at the J. Clarke Richardson<br />

Community Theatre, Heritage Square <strong>and</strong> the Village Community<br />

Centre. There are also limited opportunities available at local<br />

churches, schools <strong>and</strong> service clubs, as well as at the informal<br />

outdoor amphitheatre located along the <strong>Ajax</strong> waterfront.<br />

Arts <strong>and</strong> cultural organizations presently operating in <strong>Ajax</strong> have a<br />

diverse range <strong>of</strong> facility‐specific dem<strong>and</strong>s, ranging from simple<br />

gathering places to exhibition <strong>and</strong> sophisticated performance<br />

spaces. Given that the arts are an “experience”, sensory<br />

components (i.e. audio‐visual, multimedia, etc.) are generally<br />

required in venues designated for creative activity; for example,<br />

musical organizations may require rooms that are designed to<br />

enhance acoustics while artistic groups may require spaces<br />

equipped with sinks <strong>and</strong> work benches.<br />

To meet the dem<strong>and</strong> for a range <strong>of</strong> interests, the provision <strong>of</strong><br />

flexible, multi‐use spaces is key to accommodating the arts <strong>and</strong><br />

culture sector. Existing <strong>and</strong> future meeting/gathering spaces<br />

should accommodate arts <strong>and</strong> cultural needs, where feasible; for<br />

example, gallery spaces could ideally complement appropriate<br />

public facilities such as the <strong>Town</strong> Hall.<br />

To specifically address the needs <strong>of</strong> the performing arts<br />

community, the recently acquired St. Francis de Sales Church may<br />

<strong>of</strong>fer a venue for community‐level theatrical productions. A<br />

structural evaluation <strong>of</strong> the former church <strong>and</strong> a business plan will<br />

be required to determine the costs associated with retr<strong>of</strong>itting the<br />

facility to accommodate arts <strong>and</strong> cultural interests.<br />

As suggested in the Section 3.2, the aging ice rink at Village Arena<br />

will need to be replaced, ideally in the form <strong>of</strong> a new twin‐pad<br />

arena facility at a new community centre. This presents an<br />

opportunity to convert or retr<strong>of</strong>it the Village Arena <strong>and</strong><br />

MONTEITH BROWN PLANNING CONSULTANTS in association with Tucker‐Reid & Associates & The JF Group<br />

April 2008<br />

Page 28


<strong>Recreation</strong>, <strong>Parks</strong> & <strong>Culture</strong> Facilities<br />

Community Centre to an alternative use(s) <strong>and</strong> create a<br />

centralized hub for creative <strong>and</strong> cultural activity in the Pickering<br />

Village. Any conversion should conform to directions set forth by<br />

the Pickering Village Urban Design & Heritage Study.<br />

As such, the <strong>Town</strong> may benefit from repurposing the Village Arena<br />

to become a multi‐purpose/multi‐media recreation space once<br />

the new twin‐pad arena in the proposed multi‐use community<br />

complex at Sportsplex Park is completed (thereby rendering the<br />

Village Arena ice pad as surplus). The Village facility would ideally<br />

include visual, performing art, music <strong>and</strong> dance, heritage <strong>and</strong><br />

gallery spaces; possibilities also exist for spaces for community<br />

groups, leasable vendor opportunities, general meeting areas, etc.<br />

Such a development would lend itself well to Memorial Park,<br />

which contains a public library branch (joint‐spaces in the new<br />

facility may provide additional programming opportunities) <strong>and</strong><br />

the very nature <strong>of</strong> the park, which recognizes the military history<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>Ajax</strong>. In addition, it is recommended that the <strong>Town</strong> consider<br />

passive community uses which could be situated upon the open<br />

park space; this may include (but not be limited to) a public plaza<br />

similar in nature to Heritage Square, an outdoor amphitheatre or<br />

performance space, public gardens, personal reflection area, etc.<br />

Libraries are also places that foster creative thought <strong>and</strong> cultural<br />

activities. It would appear that a new library branch would be<br />

needed to serve the newly developing areas in north <strong>Ajax</strong> (<strong>and</strong><br />

could potentially be located within the new community centre).<br />

An independent library needs assessment would be required to<br />

evaluate the most suitable location(s) <strong>and</strong> determine the<br />

implementation strategy for new library branches in <strong>Ajax</strong>.<br />

The <strong>Town</strong> should continue to develop civic spaces that encourage<br />

social gatherings <strong>and</strong> are able to accommodate special events<br />

(e.g. Heritage Square, Greenwood Conservation Area, <strong>Ajax</strong><br />

Waterfront, etc.), <strong>and</strong> are supported by the necessary<br />

infrastructure to do so. The dem<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> support for community<br />

events was apparent throughout the consultation process <strong>and</strong><br />

residents appear to greatly value the special events <strong>and</strong><br />

gatherings delivered by the municipality.<br />

On a smaller‐scale, public gathering features should be<br />

incorporated into neighbourhood park designs that could<br />

potentially have small amphitheatres/stages, seating areas,<br />

gazebos, etc. These neighbourhood parks would then be able to<br />

host gatherings which could encourage surrounding residents to<br />

interact <strong>and</strong> develop a sense <strong>of</strong> community. On a larger scale,<br />

these spaces could include outdoor performance venues which<br />

are able to host larger crowds.<br />

Action <strong>Plan</strong>s:<br />

The <strong>Town</strong> should continually work with the arts <strong>and</strong><br />

cultural community to optimize the utilization <strong>of</strong> existing<br />

meeting/gathering spaces for their potential to<br />

accommodate specific needs <strong>of</strong> these groups.<br />

The <strong>Town</strong> should employ a focused <strong>and</strong> phased strategy<br />

in developing cultural capacity in <strong>Ajax</strong> prior to larger<br />

scale facility developments. In support <strong>of</strong> this effort, the<br />

<strong>Town</strong> should evaluate the feasibility <strong>of</strong> retr<strong>of</strong>itting the<br />

former St. Francis de Sales Church into a venue capable<br />

<strong>of</strong> hosting community‐level programming including arts<br />

<strong>and</strong> theatrical productions as churches are ideally suited<br />

for such uses.<br />

Upon completion <strong>of</strong> the proposed multi‐use community<br />

centre <strong>and</strong> its associated twin‐pad arena, the <strong>Town</strong><br />

should evaluate the feasibility <strong>of</strong> repurposing the Village<br />

Arena & Community Centre site to become a multipurpose/multi‐media<br />

recreation centre to serve as the<br />

primary hub for cultural activity in the Pickering Village. It<br />

is envisioned that the area itself become a campus for<br />

creative activity by incorporating indoor <strong>and</strong> outdoor<br />

facilities that are responsive to the creative class,<br />

residents <strong>and</strong> commercial enterprise.<br />

MONTEITH BROWN PLANNING CONSULTANTS in association with Tucker‐Reid & Associates & The JF Group<br />

April 2008<br />

Page 29


<strong>Recreation</strong>, <strong>Parks</strong> & <strong>Culture</strong> Facilities<br />

When including meeting spaces at the new multi‐use<br />

community centre (<strong>and</strong>/or at any other new community<br />

facilities), consideration should be given to<br />

accommodating certain needs <strong>of</strong> the arts <strong>and</strong> culture<br />

sector through the design <strong>of</strong> the facilities.<br />

In conjunction with the <strong>Ajax</strong> Public Library, the <strong>Town</strong><br />

should discuss the potential <strong>of</strong> including a new library<br />

branch within the proposed multi‐use community centre,<br />

likely necessitating the <strong>Town</strong> to undertake a library needs<br />

assessment <strong>and</strong> feasibility study.<br />

Heritage Assets<br />

It is a goal <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Town</strong>’s Official <strong>Plan</strong> to protect its cultural<br />

heritage resources because they contribute to a sense <strong>of</strong><br />

community <strong>and</strong> provide continuity between the past <strong>and</strong> the<br />

present. The Ontario Heritage Act gives the <strong>Town</strong> the authority to<br />

protect buildings <strong>of</strong> historical or architectural significance.<br />

Heritage designations can help to preserve the essence <strong>of</strong> an area,<br />

increase the intrinsic <strong>and</strong>/or monetary value <strong>of</strong> a property, <strong>and</strong><br />

protect examples <strong>of</strong> historic architectural styles. Designations can<br />

assist in recognizing <strong>and</strong> enforcing the cultural value <strong>of</strong>, <strong>and</strong><br />

community appreciation for, heritage properties while providing<br />

protection against inappropriate treatment.<br />

The <strong>Town</strong> has established the Heritage Advisory Committee to<br />

provide advice <strong>and</strong> assistance to Council, the <strong>Plan</strong>ning &<br />

Development Services Department, the Legislative <strong>and</strong><br />

Information Services Department <strong>and</strong> private property owners on<br />

matters relating to the conservation <strong>of</strong> the community’s historic<br />

buildings <strong>and</strong> architectural heritage.<br />

Where possible, the <strong>Town</strong> should<br />

incorporate appropriate heritage<br />

elements into the design <strong>of</strong><br />

indoor <strong>and</strong> outdoor public<br />

spaces in order help define a<br />

sense <strong>of</strong> history <strong>and</strong> place.<br />

Incorporation <strong>of</strong> heritage assets<br />

through municipal spaces also<br />

fosters a greater appreciation<br />

through underst<strong>and</strong>ing among<br />

residents, particularly those who<br />

are new to <strong>Ajax</strong>. The waterfront<br />

is an ideal location to showcase<br />

the <strong>Town</strong>’s rich history as it<br />

would complement existing<br />

interpretive features such as the Veterans Point Gardens <strong>and</strong><br />

highlight <strong>Ajax</strong>’s shipbuilding heritage.<br />

Action <strong>Plan</strong>s:<br />

The <strong>Town</strong> should develop an internal agreement as to<br />

how to strategically deliver the heritage portfolio,<br />

including roles <strong>and</strong> responsibilities <strong>of</strong> each department.<br />

The <strong>Recreation</strong> Services, <strong>Plan</strong>ning & Development<br />

Services, <strong>and</strong> Operations & Environmental Services<br />

departments should provide input to the Heritage<br />

Advisory Committee in order to assist in protecting<br />

properties with historically significant architecture <strong>and</strong><br />

urban design features.<br />

MONTEITH BROWN PLANNING CONSULTANTS in association with Tucker‐Reid & Associates & The JF Group<br />

April 2008<br />

Page 30


<strong>Recreation</strong>, <strong>Parks</strong> & <strong>Culture</strong> Facilities<br />

3.4 Outdoor <strong>Recreation</strong> Facilities<br />

The following table summarizes outdoor recreation facility needs according to needs<br />

assessments conducted as part <strong>of</strong> the master planning process. For detailed technical<br />

information <strong>and</strong> analyses, please refer to the Needs Assessment Report which serves as<br />

a background document to this <strong>Master</strong> <strong>Plan</strong>.<br />

Table 2: Outdoor <strong>Recreation</strong> Facility Needs, 2007‐2021<br />

Outdoor Facility Type Recommended Provision Target Municipal<br />

Supply<br />

(2007)<br />

Current<br />

Dem<strong>and</strong><br />

(2007)<br />

Current<br />

Surplus<br />

(Deficit)<br />

Future<br />

Dem<strong>and</strong><br />

(2021)<br />

Future<br />

Surplus<br />

(Deficit)<br />

Soccer Fields 1 Full Soccer Field per 90 registered participants 56 63.2 (1.9)* 70.7 (7.2)*<br />

Ball Diamonds 1 Ball Diamond per 100 registered participants 32 11.6 20.4* 14.5 17.5*<br />

Multi‐Use Courts 1 Tennis Court per 5,000 residents <strong>and</strong> 1<br />

Basketball Court per 1,000 youth (aged 10‐19)<br />

27.5 31.4 4** 37.2 6**<br />

Skateboard <strong>Parks</strong> 1 Skateboard Park per 5,000 youth (aged 10‐19) 2 3.1 (1.1) 3.3 (1.3)<br />

Outdoor Aquatics 1 Splash Pad per 5,000 children (aged 0‐14) 2 4.1 (2.1) 4.6 (2.6)<br />

Playgrounds 1 Playground per 500 metre radius See analysis contained in this Section<br />

Multi‐Use Fields Market Dependent (no target recommended) See analysis contained in this Section<br />

Waterfront Facilities Market Dependent (no target recommended) See analysis contained in this Section<br />

Off‐Leash Dog <strong>Parks</strong> Market Dependent (no target recommended) See analysis contained in this Section<br />

Note: Projected populations for the years 2007 <strong>and</strong> 2021 are 93,553 <strong>and</strong> 125,589 respectively<br />

* Field surplus/deficit is considered in terms <strong>of</strong> unlit full field equivalents, therefore, totals do not reflect physical supply/dem<strong>and</strong> as identified<br />

** Dem<strong>and</strong> calculations utilize a blended st<strong>and</strong>ard whereby tennis <strong>and</strong> basketball courts are consolidated into a single court, therefore<br />

surplus/deficit totals do not reflect physical supply/dem<strong>and</strong> as identified<br />

MONTEITH BROWN PLANNING CONSULTANTS in association with Tucker‐Reid & Associates & The JF Group<br />

April 2008<br />

Page 31


<strong>Recreation</strong>, <strong>Parks</strong> & <strong>Culture</strong> Facilities<br />

Greenways & Greenbelts<br />

The <strong>Town</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Ajax</strong> has an expansive trail <strong>and</strong> greenbelt system that<br />

serves a range <strong>of</strong> recreational <strong>and</strong> conservation uses. Key trails<br />

include:<br />

• Waterfront Trail • Audley Trail<br />

• Duffins Trail • <strong>Ajax</strong> Greenbelt Trail<br />

• <strong>Ajax</strong> Discovery Bay Trail • Church Street Trail<br />

• Carruthers Creek Trail • Greenwood Trails<br />

• Millers Creek Trail • Taunton Trail<br />

The <strong>Town</strong> should continue to place a high importance on its trail<br />

facilities by making multi‐use trail development a high priority.<br />

Trails are as much <strong>of</strong> a recreational “facility” as arenas, parks <strong>and</strong><br />

sports fields. They are multi‐seasonal facilities, particularly if they<br />

can accommodate winter activities such as cross‐country skiing,<br />

snowshoeing, etc. <strong>and</strong> returning to designated hiking / cycling<br />

trails in the spring, summer <strong>and</strong> fall months. Convenience is also<br />

important through the provision <strong>of</strong> trail‐related amenities such as<br />

parking, benches, lighting, washrooms, etc.<br />

Action <strong>Plan</strong>s:<br />

The <strong>Town</strong> should continue to implement the key<br />

recommendations <strong>of</strong> the Bicycle <strong>and</strong> Leisure Trail System<br />

<strong>Plan</strong>. As a key corporate document, this <strong>Plan</strong> should be<br />

revisited in 2011, approximately ten years from its date<br />

<strong>of</strong> adoption, to ensure relevancy to future circumstances<br />

<strong>and</strong> monitor progress to date.<br />

Future subdivisions should continue to be designed to<br />

accommodate trail networks, especially those that have<br />

the potential to connect to the major trail networks<br />

present in <strong>Ajax</strong>.<br />

The <strong>Plan</strong>ning & Development Services Department, in<br />

reviewing plans <strong>of</strong> subdivision, should make every effort<br />

in acquiring adequate parking at suitable access points in<br />

the trail system.<br />

The <strong>Town</strong> should design trails to become multi‐seasonal<br />

facilities which can provide a range <strong>of</strong> opportunities in<br />

the summer <strong>and</strong> winter months. The types <strong>of</strong> permitted<br />

uses should be evaluated on a trail‐by‐trail basis.<br />

Continue to develop waterfront trails that showcase the<br />

exceptional aesthetic value <strong>of</strong> Lake Ontario, Duffins Bay<br />

<strong>and</strong>/or other creek systems contained within <strong>Ajax</strong>.<br />

Soccer Fields<br />

The <strong>Town</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Ajax</strong> maintains a supply <strong>of</strong> 54 soccer fields (or 56<br />

unlit equivalents), the majority <strong>of</strong> which are set up as mini fields<br />

for children. Research suggests that there are nearly 5,700 soccer<br />

players registered with local clubs in <strong>Ajax</strong>.<br />

The <strong>Town</strong> should set the present level <strong>of</strong> service to a target <strong>of</strong> one<br />

unlit full field equivalent per 90 registered players which would<br />

bring it in line with similar communities. An unlit full field<br />

MONTEITH BROWN PLANNING CONSULTANTS in association with Tucker‐Reid & Associates & The JF Group<br />

April 2008<br />

Page 32


<strong>Recreation</strong>, <strong>Parks</strong> & <strong>Culture</strong> Facilities<br />

equivalent st<strong>and</strong>ardizes fields <strong>of</strong> various sizes <strong>and</strong> quality; for<br />

example a field with lighting systems is considered to be 1.5 unlit<br />

equivalents due to its ability to accommodate play during the late<br />

evening while two mini fields is considered to be the same as one<br />

full field.<br />

The greatest pressure<br />

presently exists for<br />

mini fields, which are<br />

largely associated with<br />

the growth in the 0‐9<br />

year age cohort. A<br />

need for seventeen<br />

additional mini fields<br />

by the year 2021 will<br />

become apparent if<br />

current participation<br />

levels persist; as two<br />

mini games can be simultaneously played across a single full size<br />

field, the mini deficit can be considered to be 5.0 full fields at<br />

present growing to a need for 8.5 full fields by 2021. Mini field<br />

deficits are slightly <strong>of</strong>fset by a surplus in full size fields (3 fields at<br />

present <strong>and</strong> 1.5 fields in 2021) leaving a long‐term deficit <strong>of</strong> 7 full<br />

size field equivalents.<br />

A much lesser degree <strong>of</strong> pressure exists for full size fields targeted<br />

to older age cohorts. Presently, the <strong>Town</strong> has a surplus <strong>of</strong> full size<br />

fields, which is in line with data obtained from the <strong>Town</strong>’s Facility<br />

Usage Report. Although peak dem<strong>and</strong> will be reached in 2011, the<br />

number <strong>of</strong> youth aged 10 to 19 (the primary users <strong>of</strong> full fields) is<br />

expected to decline after the year 2016, which is why stabilized<br />

dem<strong>and</strong> can be observed for full fields after this time.<br />

Action <strong>Plan</strong>s:<br />

The <strong>Town</strong> should proceed with all field lighting <strong>and</strong> turf<br />

improvement projects identified in its Long Range Capital<br />

Forecast in order to improve field quality <strong>and</strong> encourage<br />

bookings <strong>of</strong> existing fields as a means to achieve<br />

reasonable usage targets.<br />

Construct a total <strong>of</strong> seven new unlit full size soccer field<br />

equivalents by 2021, proceeding with those already<br />

identified in the Long Term Capital Forecast; to the<br />

greatest extent possible, new fields should be clustered<br />

together to form multi‐field complexes, either at existing<br />

parks or at future park locations. It is recommended that,<br />

pending confirmation through a business planning<br />

exercise, at least one field be designed with an artificial<br />

turf surface to <strong>of</strong>fer extended playable hours.<br />

The <strong>Town</strong> should evaluate the possibility <strong>of</strong> converting<br />

surplus s<strong>of</strong>tball diamonds to soccer fields as a means to<br />

address the soccer field shortage.<br />

The <strong>Town</strong> should continue to work with soccer<br />

organizations in order to evaluate field usage through the<br />

Facility Usage Report. The <strong>Town</strong> should collect<br />

registration data from all permitted organizations on an<br />

annual basis in order to apply the recommended<br />

provision target <strong>of</strong> one soccer field per 90 players as a<br />

means to evaluate dem<strong>and</strong> for fields in conjunction with<br />

facility usage data.<br />

Through acceptable agreements with local school boards,<br />

the <strong>Town</strong> should encourage soccer field usage at school<br />

campuses to maximize supply <strong>and</strong> space requirements.<br />

Multi‐Use Fields<br />

The <strong>Town</strong> schedules many field sports such as football, field<br />

lacrosse, rugby, Ultimate Frisbee, etc. on soccer fields, although<br />

the Rol<strong>and</strong> Michener field is primarily used for football (<strong>and</strong><br />

accommodates limited use for soccer as well). Additionally, a<br />

dedicated cricket pitch is located at the <strong>Ajax</strong> Community Centre<br />

<strong>and</strong> has been met with success.<br />

MONTEITH BROWN PLANNING CONSULTANTS in association with Tucker‐Reid & Associates & The JF Group<br />

April 2008<br />

Page 33


<strong>Recreation</strong>, <strong>Parks</strong> & <strong>Culture</strong> Facilities<br />

Dem<strong>and</strong> appears to be limited for sports such as football, lacrosse<br />

<strong>and</strong> rugby when compared to soccer. While dedicated fields for<br />

non‐soccer users is not recommended at this time, the <strong>Town</strong><br />

should continue to find opportunities for such users to access<br />

available fields. The <strong>Town</strong> should continue its practice <strong>of</strong><br />

scheduling non‐soccer users on existing sports fields <strong>and</strong> enhance<br />

its overall supply <strong>of</strong> fields to allow additional hours <strong>of</strong> play.<br />

The installation <strong>of</strong> artificial turf at the <strong>Ajax</strong> Community Centre (or<br />

Sportsplex Park as a possible alternative) would allow a greater<br />

degree <strong>of</strong> use without adversely affecting field quality. If deemed<br />

appropriate by the <strong>Town</strong> (through a business planning exercise),<br />

the possibility would also exist to enclose the artificial turf field<br />

with a temporary dome or bubble to facilitate winter use.<br />

Action <strong>Plan</strong>s:<br />

The <strong>Town</strong> should continue to work with the local school<br />

boards, to the greatest extent possible, to ensure that<br />

new <strong>and</strong> existing school fields – in concert with municipal<br />

fields – are able to accommodate football, lacrosse <strong>and</strong><br />

other field sports.<br />

Pending confirmation through a business planning<br />

exercise, the <strong>Town</strong> should provide an artificial turf field<br />

(preferred for development at either <strong>Ajax</strong> Community<br />

Centre or Sportsplex Park) for a variety <strong>of</strong> field sports, in<br />

a manner that is equitable to a range <strong>of</strong> users. Should<br />

substantial use be observed at this field, the <strong>Town</strong> should<br />

develop one additional field (natural or artificial turf) for<br />

similar uses.<br />

Ball Diamonds<br />

The <strong>Town</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Ajax</strong> maintains a supply <strong>of</strong> 22 hardball <strong>and</strong> s<strong>of</strong>tball<br />

diamonds (or 32 unlit field equivalents). Research suggests that<br />

there are approximately 1,161 ball players presently registered<br />

with leagues in <strong>Ajax</strong>.<br />

Experience suggests that a target <strong>of</strong> one ball diamond per 100<br />

registered players is sufficient to meet localized dem<strong>and</strong> for<br />

diamonds. Based upon this target, the <strong>Town</strong> currently has a<br />

significant surplus <strong>of</strong> ball diamonds, predominantly consisting <strong>of</strong><br />

s<strong>of</strong>tball venues. The <strong>Town</strong>, therefore, should focus upon<br />

improving <strong>and</strong> maintaining a high quality level for play at existing<br />

high quality diamonds (i.e. Type 1 <strong>and</strong>/or Type 2) rather than<br />

pursuing the development <strong>of</strong> new ball facilities.<br />

With regard to the lower quality diamonds (i.e. Type 3 <strong>and</strong><br />

practice diamonds) in <strong>Ajax</strong>,<br />

the <strong>Town</strong> should evaluate<br />

which fields remain suitable<br />

for neighbourhood‐level<br />

ball play <strong>and</strong> which<br />

diamonds should be<br />

designated as surplus. It is<br />

recommended that the<br />

<strong>Town</strong> consider converting<br />

or re‐purposing surplus<br />

diamonds to other uses<br />

such as soccer, open space,<br />

etc. The <strong>Town</strong> should also evaluate the possibility <strong>of</strong> installing<br />

grass infields at these diamonds which would facilitate additional<br />

informal, non‐programmed types <strong>of</strong> uses <strong>and</strong> reduce maintenance<br />

costs at these facilities.<br />

Action <strong>Plan</strong>s:<br />

The <strong>Town</strong> should initiate field lighting <strong>and</strong> turf<br />

improvement projects at appropriate high‐use ball<br />

diamonds in order to continue its field improvement<br />

practices <strong>and</strong> encourage bookings <strong>of</strong> existing fields.<br />

The <strong>Town</strong> should undertake a study <strong>of</strong> its underutilized<br />

<strong>and</strong> lower quality diamonds in order to identify potential<br />

surplus diamonds which would be better suited to<br />

accommodate other community facility needs. This<br />

MONTEITH BROWN PLANNING CONSULTANTS in association with Tucker‐Reid & Associates & The JF Group<br />

April 2008<br />

Page 34


<strong>Recreation</strong>, <strong>Parks</strong> & <strong>Culture</strong> Facilities<br />

process should be conducted in concert with appropriate<br />

stakeholder groups <strong>and</strong> other neighbourhood<br />

representatives.<br />

In order to accurately assess market dem<strong>and</strong> for ball in<br />

<strong>Ajax</strong>, the <strong>Town</strong> should continue to work with hardball<br />

<strong>and</strong> s<strong>of</strong>tball organizations in order to evaluate field usage<br />

through the Facility Usage Report. The <strong>Town</strong> should<br />

collect registration data from all permitted organizations<br />

on an annual basis in order to apply the recommended<br />

provision target <strong>of</strong> one ball diamond per 100 players as a<br />

means to evaluate dem<strong>and</strong> for fields in conjunction with<br />

facility usage data.<br />

employed to <strong>of</strong>fer basketball <strong>and</strong> tennis, five new multi‐use courts<br />

would be required.<br />

Multi‐Use Courts<br />

The <strong>Town</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Ajax</strong> provides 16 public tennis courts, four <strong>of</strong> which<br />

are specifically used for competitive play. The <strong>Town</strong> also<br />

maintains a supply 9 basketball courts (7.5 full court equivalents).<br />

In addition to this supply, the <strong>Town</strong> <strong>of</strong>fers two full multi‐use<br />

asphalt courts that can be used for multiple activities such as<br />

basketball, tennis, ball hockey, etc.<br />

Although a multi‐use court design template is recommended for<br />

all future court developments, it is necessary to examine activity<br />

specific needs for tennis <strong>and</strong> basketball; other activities that may<br />

occur on a multi‐use court (i.e. ball hockey, outdoor skating) do<br />

not have a defined level <strong>of</strong> service associated with them. In the<br />

case <strong>of</strong> tennis, a target <strong>of</strong> 1 court per 6,000 residents is<br />

appropriate while a target <strong>of</strong> one basketball court per 750 youth<br />

(ages 10‐19) is sufficient in determining the needs <strong>of</strong> the core<br />

interest in outdoor basketball.<br />

Application <strong>of</strong> the tennis target reveals the present supply to be<br />

sufficient, however, by 2021 there will be a need for five more<br />

locations; similarly, a need for five basketball court locations will<br />

be apparent in that same time frame. If a multi‐use template is<br />

Although a need for five new multi‐use courts is demonstrated,<br />

however, it is preferred that multi‐use courts be developed in<br />

pairs (to allow at least one <strong>of</strong> tennis <strong>and</strong>/or basketball activities to<br />

take place), <strong>and</strong> so a minimum <strong>of</strong> six new courts would meet<br />

service level targets; additional courts may be required based on<br />

spatial distribution <strong>of</strong> future residential developments.<br />

The majority <strong>of</strong> new court developments should be associated<br />

with neighbourhood <strong>and</strong> community‐level park developments in<br />

the <strong>Town</strong>’s growing eastern areas as well as possibly in the southwest<br />

quadrant or a northern park.<br />

Action <strong>Plan</strong>s:<br />

The <strong>Town</strong> should develop new court facilities utilizing a<br />

multi‐use design template, which allow multiple sports to<br />

be played on the surface. Future growth suggests that at<br />

least six new multi‐use courts are required by 2021.<br />

MONTEITH BROWN PLANNING CONSULTANTS in association with Tucker‐Reid & Associates & The JF Group<br />

April 2008<br />

Page 35


<strong>Recreation</strong>, <strong>Parks</strong> & <strong>Culture</strong> Facilities<br />

Where <strong>and</strong> when required, the <strong>Town</strong> should upgrade<br />

existing courts to provide a safe <strong>and</strong> higher quality<br />

experience for users.<br />

Skateboard <strong>Parks</strong><br />

There are two municipal skateboard parks in <strong>Ajax</strong>, located at<br />

Millers Creek Park (McLean Community Centre) <strong>and</strong> <strong>Ajax</strong><br />

Community Centre Park.<br />

An age‐specific target is deemed to be the most appropriate tool<br />

for determining the dem<strong>and</strong> for skateboard parks since youth are<br />

the primary users <strong>of</strong> the facility. Experience suggests that a target<br />

<strong>of</strong> one skateboard park per 5,000 youth aged 10 to 19 is sufficient,<br />

however, spatial distribution <strong>of</strong> these facilities is also key given<br />

the fact that youth have limited transportation opportunities.<br />

would serve the <strong>Town</strong>’s north‐eastern communities <strong>and</strong> it is<br />

readily accessible by transit.<br />

The <strong>Town</strong> should also focus on improving its existing skateboard<br />

park facilities at the McLean Community Centre <strong>and</strong> the <strong>Ajax</strong><br />

Community Centre. This can likely be done with minimal<br />

investment by re‐orienting the layout <strong>of</strong> these skateparks to<br />

improve flow <strong>and</strong> should be done in consultation with interested<br />

youth <strong>and</strong> representatives <strong>of</strong> the local skateboarding community.<br />

In order to encourage children <strong>and</strong> youth, particularly those who<br />

are learning to skateboard, to make use <strong>of</strong> the casual<br />

opportunities <strong>of</strong>fered by neighbourhood‐level parks, the<br />

incorporation <strong>of</strong> smaller‐scale introductory‐level “skate zones” is<br />

suggested. These amenities are ideally added in during park<br />

development <strong>and</strong> redevelopment projects <strong>and</strong> their design may<br />

vary by park; they should, however, be appropriate for beginners<br />

<strong>and</strong> intermediate‐level users.<br />

Dem<strong>and</strong> calculations suggest that the <strong>Town</strong> will need to construct<br />

one new skateboard park to meet the needs <strong>of</strong> local youth; given<br />

the stable youth population, this new facility should be sufficient<br />

to meet dem<strong>and</strong> over the next fifteen years. The most ideal site<br />

for the new skateboard park would be Sportsplex Park, which<br />

Action <strong>Plan</strong>s:<br />

Based upon the recommended target, growth in the<br />

youth population <strong>and</strong> usage at existing facilities, the<br />

provision <strong>of</strong> one new skateboard park is required to meet<br />

long‐term dem<strong>and</strong>s; it is preferred that this skatepark be<br />

constructed as part <strong>of</strong> the Sportsplex Park expansion.<br />

The <strong>Town</strong> should regularly consult with the local<br />

skateboarding community <strong>and</strong> other youth in the design<br />

<strong>and</strong> redesign <strong>of</strong> new <strong>and</strong> existing skateboard parks to<br />

ensure that skateboarding facilities are cost‐effective <strong>and</strong><br />

responsive to current design trends <strong>and</strong> user<br />

preferences.<br />

The provision <strong>of</strong> introductory‐level skate zones is<br />

encouraged at the neighbourhood park level through the<br />

park development or renewal process to facilitate casual<br />

use <strong>of</strong> the park by those who want basic skate features.<br />

MONTEITH BROWN PLANNING CONSULTANTS in association with Tucker‐Reid & Associates & The JF Group<br />

April 2008<br />

Page 36


<strong>Recreation</strong>, <strong>Parks</strong> & <strong>Culture</strong> Facilities<br />

Playgrounds<br />

The <strong>Town</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Ajax</strong> maintains playground equipment at 51<br />

municipal parks; the physical supply consists <strong>of</strong> 49 creative play<br />

apparatuses <strong>and</strong> 9 traditional apparatuses. Included in the supply<br />

are the four accessible playgrounds (for children with special<br />

needs) at Rotary Park, the <strong>Ajax</strong> Community Centre, McLean<br />

Community Centre <strong>and</strong> Greenwood Conservation Area.<br />

Figure 4: Distribution <strong>of</strong> Playgrounds<br />

The spatial distribution <strong>of</strong> playgrounds <strong>and</strong> their service radii (set<br />

at 500 metres, or approximately a ten minute walk time) is<br />

illustrated through Figure 4. Two notable gaps areas appear in<br />

the vicinity <strong>of</strong> the following existing or newly developing<br />

residential areas:<br />

• Williamson Drive at Harwood Road<br />

• Rossl<strong>and</strong> Road at Audley Road<br />

The <strong>Town</strong> should address gaps in newly developing residential<br />

areas by installing playgrounds within new parks located in these<br />

communities.<br />

The provision <strong>of</strong> barrier‐free playground equipment is another<br />

trend prevalent in other communities that would be a good<br />

practice for the <strong>Town</strong> to continue to implement based upon<br />

success observed at the existing four locations. It is preferable<br />

that such a facility be provided at a major Community or <strong>Town</strong>wide<br />

Park such as along the eastern portion <strong>of</strong> the waterfront, at<br />

Sportsplex Park <strong>and</strong>/or the future A3 (Lajter) Community Park.<br />

MONTEITH BROWN PLANNING CONSULTANTS in association with Tucker‐Reid & Associates & The JF Group<br />

April 2008<br />

Page 37


<strong>Recreation</strong>, <strong>Parks</strong> & <strong>Culture</strong> Facilities<br />

Action <strong>Plan</strong>s:<br />

The <strong>Town</strong> should target the provision <strong>of</strong> playgrounds<br />

within a service radius <strong>of</strong> 500 metres <strong>of</strong> all built up<br />

residential areas, unobstructed by major barriers.<br />

The <strong>Town</strong> should continue to follow CSA guidelines for<br />

playground construction <strong>and</strong> ensure that all playgrounds<br />

are regularly inspected <strong>and</strong> maintained by trained staff.<br />

In considering the needs <strong>of</strong> children with special needs<br />

<strong>and</strong> disabilities, the <strong>Town</strong> should construct fully<br />

accessible, barrier‐free playgrounds at the <strong>Ajax</strong><br />

Waterfront <strong>and</strong> at Sportsplex Park. Furthermore, the<br />

<strong>Town</strong> should set a long‐term goal <strong>of</strong> continuing to<br />

provide several barrier‐free playgrounds dispersed across<br />

<strong>Ajax</strong>.<br />

Generally speaking, “major” splash pads such as those currently<br />

<strong>of</strong>fered in <strong>Ajax</strong> are best suited at Community <strong>and</strong> <strong>Town</strong>‐wide level<br />

parks, given that the waterplay facilities will be larger in terms <strong>of</strong><br />

size <strong>and</strong> scope. The first splash pad should be provided in the<br />

eastern area <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Ajax</strong> waterfront (i.e. at the Waterfront East<br />

Community Pavilion). To maintain a level <strong>of</strong> service similar to<br />

other major community centres in <strong>Ajax</strong>, the <strong>Town</strong> should also<br />

provide one splash pad at the Sportsplex Park site. The location <strong>of</strong><br />

the third splash pad should be determined when the <strong>Town</strong> reevaluates<br />

needs after the provision <strong>of</strong> the first two facilities.<br />

Furthermore, the <strong>Town</strong> may also wish to investigate the<br />

development <strong>of</strong> “minor” splash pads at selected neighbourhoodlevel<br />

parks, which would <strong>of</strong>fer a very basic cooling amenity at a<br />

much lower cost.<br />

Outdoor Aquatics<br />

Outdoor aquatic needs in <strong>Ajax</strong> are served by one recreational<br />

outdoor pool (Memorial Pool at Arbour Park), two wading pools<br />

(Arbour Park <strong>and</strong> Exeter Park) <strong>and</strong> two waterplay facilities (Millers<br />

Creek Park <strong>and</strong> Rotary Park).<br />

The <strong>Town</strong>’s two existing splash pads appear to be very well<br />

utilized; given the age‐specific market these facilities are serving,<br />

a provision target <strong>of</strong> one splash pad per 5,000 children aged under<br />

14 is recommended. Based upon the age‐specific target, the<br />

<strong>Town</strong> would require three additional splash pads to meet longterm<br />

need.<br />

If the target is any indication, there will likely be a degree <strong>of</strong> latent<br />

dem<strong>and</strong> after the development <strong>of</strong> the first two splash pads, thus,<br />

the <strong>Town</strong> should re‐evaluate the dem<strong>and</strong> for these facilities<br />

between 2011 <strong>and</strong> 2016 (based on factors such as usage,<br />

distribution, application <strong>of</strong> the target, etc.) to confirm the need<br />

for one additional splash pad towards the end <strong>of</strong> the planning<br />

period.<br />

With regard to Memorial Outdoor Pool, it appears that this pool<br />

continues to be relatively well used in the summer months. The<br />

<strong>Town</strong> should continue to invest in minor repairs to the pool,<br />

however, the <strong>Town</strong> should re‐evaluate the cost‐effectiveness <strong>of</strong><br />

the pool in relation to community dem<strong>and</strong> should the pool<br />

require any substantial capital investment in order to keep it safe<br />

<strong>and</strong> operational. Additionally, the <strong>Town</strong> should consider the<br />

MONTEITH BROWN PLANNING CONSULTANTS in association with Tucker‐Reid & Associates & The JF Group<br />

April 2008<br />

Page 38


<strong>Recreation</strong>, <strong>Parks</strong> & <strong>Culture</strong> Facilities<br />

usage impact <strong>of</strong> the proposed indoor aquatics development at<br />

Sportsplex Park, as well as proposed splash pads elsewhere in<br />

<strong>Ajax</strong>, on Memorial Pool in order to ensure that the outdoor pool is<br />

able to remain a cost‐effective option for the municipality.<br />

Action <strong>Plan</strong>s:<br />

The provision <strong>of</strong> three new waterplay areas is required to<br />

meet long‐term dem<strong>and</strong>s. It is recommended that one<br />

new splash pad be constructed in the eastern area <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>Ajax</strong> waterfront <strong>and</strong> one splash pad be provided at<br />

Sportsplex Park, as these parks are anticipated to<br />

become major hubs for community‐wide recreation. The<br />

need <strong>and</strong> location for the third splash pad should be<br />

reconfirmed after the other proposed facilities become<br />

operational.<br />

The <strong>Town</strong> should evaluate its strategy for Memorial Pool<br />

by undertaking a consultation process with the public<br />

<strong>and</strong> stakeholder groups in order to determine the level <strong>of</strong><br />

investment <strong>and</strong> amenities required for the outdoor pool.<br />

Waterfront Facilities<br />

<strong>Ajax</strong> is situated along six kilometres <strong>of</strong> the Lake Ontario shoreline,<br />

which is the longest undeveloped waterfront in the GTA. The <strong>Ajax</strong><br />

Waterfront is accessible to the public, with bridges spanning<br />

creeks, natural <strong>and</strong> maintained parkl<strong>and</strong> areas <strong>and</strong> gardens, as<br />

well as an extensive pathway system <strong>of</strong>fering a multitude <strong>of</strong> uses.<br />

There is also a public beach <strong>and</strong> boat launch located at Rotary<br />

Park to provide a variety <strong>of</strong> users with access to the water.<br />

The Waterfront Trail is an excellent recreational amenity <strong>and</strong><br />

serves as a destination area for tourism as well. Given the high<br />

level <strong>of</strong> use along this trail, as well as the increase in usage that<br />

can be expected with a growing population (<strong>and</strong> tourism pr<strong>of</strong>ile),<br />

the <strong>Town</strong> should give consideration to widening appropriate<br />

sections <strong>of</strong> the Waterfront Trail to provide designated paths<br />

separating pedestrians from cyclists/inline‐skaters in order to<br />

ensure user safety.<br />

The <strong>Town</strong> should continue to enhance the waterfront by adding<br />

amenities (i.e. washrooms at key locations), ongoing<br />

beautification efforts (i.e. tree plantings, horticultural displays)<br />

<strong>and</strong> infrastructure development (i.e. paving appropriate<br />

pathways, lighting, performance venues, etc.). The waterfront<br />

area is also a space that can provide opportunities for a number <strong>of</strong><br />

other marine uses such as angling, canoeing/kayaking, kite flying,<br />

etc. <strong>and</strong> should be supported with appropriate amenities (e.g.<br />

piers, beach areas, etc.) where appropriate.<br />

The expansion <strong>of</strong> tourismbased<br />

infrastructure (i.e.<br />

through extension <strong>of</strong><br />

municipal servicing <strong>and</strong><br />

development <strong>of</strong> special<br />

event venues, trail<br />

extensions, gazebos,<br />

concessions <strong>and</strong> leasable<br />

space, etc.) will create<br />

capacity <strong>and</strong> support for<br />

activities <strong>and</strong> events. The<br />

<strong>Town</strong> should also proceed<br />

with the development <strong>of</strong> a<br />

community pavilion in the<br />

eastern area <strong>of</strong> the<br />

waterfront which would serve a similar purpose to the Rotary<br />

Park facility <strong>and</strong> provide an anchor to that section <strong>of</strong> the<br />

waterfront. The <strong>Town</strong>’s Waterfront Management <strong>Plan</strong> provides a<br />

number <strong>of</strong> directions aimed at improving the waterfront area <strong>and</strong><br />

the <strong>Town</strong> should continue to implement its key findings.<br />

Rotary Park is home to a public beach <strong>and</strong> forms an important<br />

piece <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Ajax</strong> Waterfront. The Rotary Park Pavilion is a key<br />

focal point along the waterfront <strong>and</strong> is also utilized as a comfort<br />

station for waterfront users <strong>and</strong> as a venue for municipal<br />

MONTEITH BROWN PLANNING CONSULTANTS in association with Tucker‐Reid & Associates & The JF Group<br />

April 2008<br />

Page 39


<strong>Recreation</strong>, <strong>Parks</strong> & <strong>Culture</strong> Facilities<br />

programs. A splash pad <strong>and</strong> large playground also contribute to<br />

the family destination atmosphere <strong>of</strong> the park.<br />

Paradise Park is another venue in the waterfront area that may<br />

benefit as a “beach hub”, thus the <strong>Town</strong> should examine a wider<br />

range <strong>of</strong> uses for this park to combine its active recreation focus<br />

with waterfront amenities. Additionally, there is an ideal beach<br />

location at the end <strong>of</strong> Audley Road, which may also function<br />

effectively as a beach area.<br />

Finally, a dem<strong>and</strong> has been observed in certain waterfront<br />

communities for outdoor beach volleyball courts. While these<br />

facilities do not necessarily have to be placed in waterfront areas,<br />

the facility lends itself well to a beach setting. S<strong>and</strong> courts are<br />

usually not considered to be a st<strong>and</strong>ard level <strong>of</strong> service, thus a<br />

target is not applicable.<br />

Action <strong>Plan</strong>s:<br />

Continue to enhance beach facilities as a means to draw<br />

residents to the waterfront; this will also require<br />

attention to water quality levels in Lake Ontario to<br />

ensure that they are optimal for swimming.<br />

The <strong>Town</strong> should prepare a concept/master plan for<br />

redevelopment <strong>and</strong> future uses at Paradise Park as a<br />

means to increase its focus as a waterfront hub for active<br />

<strong>and</strong> passive opportunities. This plan should evaluate the<br />

feasibility <strong>of</strong> closing a part <strong>of</strong> Lakeview Boulevard in<br />

order to increase the size <strong>of</strong> the park <strong>and</strong> allow a greater<br />

range <strong>of</strong> uses to take place. It is also preferable that this<br />

plan (or a concurrent process) find ways to integrate<br />

north‐south greenways with the Waterfront Trail <strong>and</strong><br />

other recreation <strong>and</strong> cultural assets in support <strong>of</strong><br />

establishing a comprehensive system <strong>of</strong> trails <strong>and</strong><br />

pathways throughout <strong>Ajax</strong>.<br />

The provision <strong>of</strong> two s<strong>and</strong> volleyball courts is<br />

recommended at Paradise Park (or other suitable<br />

location) to gauge interest in the sport. The<br />

appropriateness <strong>of</strong> this use should be confirmed through<br />

the recommended conceptual master plan for Paradise<br />

Park.<br />

Acquisition <strong>of</strong> l<strong>and</strong> along waterways is encouraged,<br />

particularly along the north‐south creeks <strong>and</strong> associated<br />

tributaries present in <strong>Ajax</strong>. Doing so will increase the<br />

supply <strong>of</strong> passive open spaces <strong>and</strong> ensure protection <strong>of</strong><br />

environmentally significant riparian areas.<br />

Off‐Leash Dog <strong>Parks</strong><br />

There are two municipal <strong>of</strong>f‐leash dog parks in <strong>Ajax</strong>, located at<br />

Greenwood Conservation Area <strong>and</strong> at Lion’s Park (at the<br />

intersection <strong>of</strong> Westney Road South <strong>and</strong> Clements Road). As a<br />

relatively new level <strong>of</strong> service, a provision target has not been<br />

established for leash‐free dog parks. These types <strong>of</strong> parks are<br />

best established by way <strong>of</strong> opportunity <strong>and</strong> should only be<br />

developed when an affiliated organization is willing to take<br />

responsibility for their operation <strong>and</strong>/or enforcement.<br />

With two municipal <strong>of</strong>f‐leash<br />

dog parks located at either end<br />

<strong>of</strong> the <strong>Town</strong>, it appears that <strong>Ajax</strong><br />

has a satisfactory supply <strong>and</strong><br />

distribution <strong>of</strong> these parks. Given<br />

the degree <strong>of</strong> public support<br />

through the household survey,<br />

the <strong>Town</strong> should be prepared to<br />

deal with requests for additional<br />

facilities. The provision <strong>of</strong><br />

additional dog parks, however,<br />

should be pursued if/when a<br />

community organization is<br />

willing to support its operation.<br />

MONTEITH BROWN PLANNING CONSULTANTS in association with Tucker‐Reid & Associates & The JF Group<br />

April 2008<br />

Page 40


<strong>Recreation</strong>, <strong>Parks</strong> & <strong>Culture</strong> Facilities<br />

Action <strong>Plan</strong>s:<br />

The <strong>Town</strong> should engage community groups interested in<br />

the establishment, general maintenance <strong>and</strong> ongoing<br />

operation when considering additional <strong>of</strong>f‐leash dog<br />

parks; this includes the establishment <strong>of</strong> an appropriate<br />

cost‐sharing agreement. Priority for any future <strong>of</strong>f‐leash<br />

parks should be given to sites in the eastern areas <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Ajax</strong>.<br />

Outdoor Skating Areas<br />

The provision <strong>of</strong> outdoor skating venues is one way to alleviate<br />

pressures on arena dem<strong>and</strong>, as it facilitates public skating <strong>and</strong><br />

pickup shinny opportunities. The <strong>Town</strong> <strong>of</strong>fers a neighbourhoodbased<br />

outdoor rink program which has been met with relative<br />

success. To augment this program, the multi‐use court template<br />

currently employed by the <strong>Town</strong> can be used to frame an outdoor<br />

rink in the winter season. The <strong>Town</strong> should explore the possibility<br />

<strong>of</strong> providing artificial ice surfaces at selected multi‐use courts in<br />

order to determine their feasibility <strong>and</strong> cost‐effectiveness in the<br />

context <strong>of</strong> evolving climatic conditions.<br />

Many municipalities have also developed skating paths in recent<br />

years to provide a different venue for ice skating. Skating paths<br />

are generally considered to be <strong>Town</strong>‐wide facilities due to the cost<br />

involved (they are generally artificial ice surfaces), thus overall<br />

provision is more important than geographic accessibility.<br />

Development <strong>of</strong> a skating path could be located at Sportsplex<br />

Park, Greenwood Conservation Area, the <strong>Town</strong> Hall site <strong>and</strong>/or<br />

Rotary Park. Opportunity may also exist to utilize existing trail or<br />

pathway routes as skating paths in the winter months. Given the<br />

investment associated with artificial ice needed for a skating path,<br />

<strong>and</strong> with no set targets for the provision <strong>of</strong> these facilities, it<br />

would be premature to develop an outdoor skating path at this<br />

time without undertaking further study.<br />

Action <strong>Plan</strong>s:<br />

The <strong>Town</strong> should explore the provision <strong>of</strong> artificial ice<br />

surfaces at appropriate multi‐use court sites <strong>and</strong><br />

strategic park locations. As part <strong>of</strong> this analysis, the<br />

<strong>Town</strong> should undertake a detailed assessment <strong>of</strong> the<br />

costs involved with constructing a skating path with<br />

artificial ice system at a future Community or <strong>Town</strong>‐wide<br />

Park. Should the benefits <strong>and</strong> usage be deemed to<br />

outweigh the costs, additional outdoor artificial ice<br />

surfaces should be explored at future locations.<br />

Other Facilities<br />

The <strong>Town</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Ajax</strong> may be pressed for additional facilities which<br />

are not discussed as part <strong>of</strong> the scope <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Recreation</strong>, <strong>Parks</strong> &<br />

<strong>Culture</strong> <strong>Master</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> (i.e. BMX tracks, specialized arts venues, etc.)<br />

<strong>and</strong>, therefore, the <strong>Town</strong> must be prepared to appropriately<br />

respond to such requests.<br />

When requests are brought forward for investment in nontraditional,<br />

emerging <strong>and</strong>/or non‐core municipal services, the<br />

<strong>Town</strong> should evaluate the need for these pursuits on a case‐bycase<br />

basis by considering factors such as costs, partnerships,<br />

ability <strong>of</strong> existing facilities to accommodate new services, etc.<br />

Action <strong>Plan</strong>s:<br />

The <strong>Town</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Ajax</strong> should respond to requests for facilities<br />

presently not part <strong>of</strong> the core m<strong>and</strong>ate on a case‐by‐case<br />

basis by evaluating the municipality’s role in providing<br />

the service in relation to quantified market dem<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong><br />

cost‐effectiveness <strong>of</strong> such services, while also identifying<br />

potential strategies to address long‐term need for such<br />

requests should a sufficient level <strong>of</strong> dem<strong>and</strong> be<br />

expressed.<br />

MONTEITH BROWN PLANNING CONSULTANTS in association with Tucker‐Reid & Associates & The JF Group<br />

April 2008<br />

Page 41


<strong>Recreation</strong>, <strong>Parks</strong> & <strong>Culture</strong> Facilities<br />

3.5 Parkl<strong>and</strong> Needs<br />

Parkl<strong>and</strong> Classification<br />

The <strong>Town</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Ajax</strong> Official <strong>Plan</strong> defines a classification <strong>of</strong> parks<br />

according to size, types <strong>of</strong> uses allowed, service radii, etc. These<br />

classifications include:<br />

• Parkettes<br />

• Neighbourhood <strong>Parks</strong><br />

• Community <strong>Parks</strong><br />

• <strong>Town</strong>‐wide <strong>Parks</strong><br />

• Open Space<br />

With the exception <strong>of</strong> the Open Space designation, all other<br />

classifications contain detailed definitions. Although the locations<br />

<strong>of</strong> Open Spaces are identified through Schedule B <strong>of</strong> the Official<br />

<strong>Plan</strong>, adding a definition <strong>of</strong> these areas should be considered at<br />

the time <strong>of</strong> the next Official <strong>Plan</strong> Review in order to ensure<br />

consistency in the document.<br />

Action <strong>Plan</strong>s:<br />

The <strong>Town</strong> should incorporate a definition <strong>of</strong> Open Space<br />

L<strong>and</strong>s into Section 2.2.5a <strong>of</strong> the Official <strong>Plan</strong>. This<br />

definition should encompass all l<strong>and</strong>s that may<br />

contribute to the passive leisure opportunities in the<br />

open space system, excluding woodlots, valley l<strong>and</strong>s <strong>and</strong><br />

other hazard l<strong>and</strong>s.<br />

Parkl<strong>and</strong> Needs<br />

Section 2.2.5 <strong>of</strong> the Official <strong>Plan</strong> encourages a provision st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />

<strong>of</strong> 3.18 hectares <strong>of</strong> <strong>Town</strong> <strong>Parks</strong> <strong>and</strong> Open Space l<strong>and</strong>s per 1,000<br />

residents; note that this st<strong>and</strong>ard does not include l<strong>and</strong>s<br />

designated as Environmental Protection or Environmental<br />

Resource Overlay. As shown in Table 3, the <strong>Town</strong> is providing<br />

parkl<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> open space at a ratio <strong>of</strong> 5.2 hectares per 1,000<br />

residents (based upon an estimated 2007 population <strong>of</strong> 93,553).<br />

Table 3: Summary <strong>of</strong> Parkl<strong>and</strong> by Designation<br />

Parkl<strong>and</strong><br />

Designation<br />

# <strong>of</strong><br />

Sites*<br />

Supply<br />

(ha)<br />

Avg. Park<br />

Size (ha)<br />

Per Capita Ratio<br />

(2007 pop. = 93,553)<br />

Parkette 14 3.21 0.23 0.03 ha / 1,000<br />

Neighbourhood 31 77.85 2.51 0.8 ha / 1,000<br />

Community 6 40.15 6.69 0.4 ha / 1,000<br />

<strong>Town</strong> Wide 5 76.65 15.33 0.8 ha / 1,000<br />

Open Space 22 292.25 13.28 3.1 ha / 1,000<br />

Total 78 490.11 6.28 5.2 ha / 1,000<br />

Environmental 7 81.66 11.67 0.9 ha / 1,000<br />

Protection**<br />

* Number <strong>of</strong> sites reflects the number <strong>of</strong> parcels/polygons in the<br />

<strong>Town</strong>’s GIS database<br />

** Environmental Protection l<strong>and</strong>s are not included in the total Per<br />

Capita Ratio<br />

Source: <strong>Town</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Ajax</strong>, 2007<br />

Many municipalities in the GTA have found that a provision level<br />

between 2.0 <strong>and</strong> 2.2 hectares per 1,000 residents is enough to<br />

support active parkl<strong>and</strong> needs, which would also accommodate<br />

major recreation facilities such as playing fields, community<br />

centres, etc. If the household survey is any indication, 93% <strong>of</strong><br />

respondents are satisfied in some form with municipal parks with<br />

athletic fields <strong>and</strong> playgrounds (i.e. active parks), thus the <strong>Town</strong>’s<br />

present level <strong>of</strong> service appears to be satisfactory <strong>and</strong> should be<br />

maintained at a similar level throughout the planning period.<br />

It would be beneficial for the <strong>Town</strong> to work towards provision<br />

targets specific to each classification <strong>of</strong> parkl<strong>and</strong>. Doing so will<br />

ensure that each classification <strong>of</strong> parkl<strong>and</strong> is provided at an<br />

MONTEITH BROWN PLANNING CONSULTANTS in association with Tucker‐Reid & Associates & The JF Group<br />

April 2008<br />

Page 42


<strong>Recreation</strong>, <strong>Parks</strong> & <strong>Culture</strong> Facilities<br />

acceptable level <strong>and</strong> will allow the <strong>Town</strong> to measure progress in<br />

parkl<strong>and</strong> provision throughout the future. It is recommended,<br />

therefore, that the <strong>Town</strong> target the provision <strong>of</strong> active parkl<strong>and</strong> at<br />

a rate <strong>of</strong> 2.0 hectares per 1,000 residents, <strong>and</strong> that the following<br />

targets be employed:<br />

• Parkettes & Neighbourhood <strong>Parks</strong> – 0.5 ha per 1,000<br />

residents<br />

• Community <strong>Parks</strong> – 0.5 ha per 1,000 residents<br />

• <strong>Town</strong>‐wide <strong>Parks</strong> – 1.0 ha per 1,000 residents<br />

With regard to passive parkl<strong>and</strong>, provision st<strong>and</strong>ards tend to be<br />

larger due to the tendency <strong>of</strong> open space parcels to be larger (e.g.<br />

woodlots, corridors along waterways, etc.). Again, with 90% <strong>of</strong><br />

household survey respondents satisfied with parks that preserve<br />

natural areas <strong>and</strong> open space, the <strong>Town</strong> should continue with its<br />

efforts to maintain its present level <strong>of</strong> service for passive<br />

parkl<strong>and</strong>.<br />

Parkl<strong>and</strong> Dem<strong>and</strong>s<br />

Based upon an analysis <strong>of</strong> long range development plans, the<br />

<strong>Town</strong> appears as though it will generally be meeting active<br />

parkl<strong>and</strong> needs until 2016, bolstered in part by the addition <strong>of</strong> 19<br />

hectares at Sportsplex Park after 2012; the active parkl<strong>and</strong> deficit<br />

will be just under 2 hectares by 2021 if no new parks are added to<br />

the supply above <strong>and</strong> beyond what is currently scheduled. The<br />

<strong>Town</strong> has planned to address Parkette <strong>and</strong> Neighbourhood Park<br />

needs, largely through conveyance associated with future<br />

development. Conversely, the supply <strong>of</strong> Community <strong>Parks</strong> <strong>and</strong><br />

Open Space <strong>Parks</strong> is not expected to be bolstered to any<br />

significant extent, if current development plans provide any<br />

indication.<br />

To meet overall parkl<strong>and</strong> needs by 2021, the <strong>Town</strong> should begin<br />

to focus acquisition efforts upon l<strong>and</strong>s suitable for<br />

accommodating higher order parks such as Community & <strong>Town</strong>wide<br />

<strong>Parks</strong>, as it is anticipated that current plans for parkette <strong>and</strong><br />

neighbourhood development are sufficient for future need.<br />

While neighbourhood parks suffice in meeting certain sports field<br />

needs, the fact that this <strong>Master</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> encourages multiple field<br />

development at single locations suggests that a greater emphasis<br />

should be placed on higher‐order parks to meet the dem<strong>and</strong> for<br />

playing fields (it is recognized, however, that neighbourhood<br />

parks are <strong>of</strong>ten located adjacent to school properties, thus<br />

<strong>of</strong>fering the ability to consolidate multiple fields at the site as<br />

well). To meet the dem<strong>and</strong> for larger parks, it would be prudent<br />

for the <strong>Town</strong> to proactively position itself to accommodate future<br />

active parkl<strong>and</strong> needs; this may include the initiation <strong>of</strong> a “l<strong>and</strong><br />

banking” process to mitigate future l<strong>and</strong> supply constraints <strong>and</strong>/or<br />

escalating real estate prices.<br />

Action <strong>Plan</strong>s:<br />

The <strong>Town</strong> continue to work towards achieving the<br />

parkl<strong>and</strong> provision st<strong>and</strong>ard contained in its Official <strong>Plan</strong>.<br />

The <strong>Town</strong> should make every attempt to work towards<br />

the provision <strong>of</strong> 2.0 hectares per 1,000 population for<br />

active parkl<strong>and</strong>. More specifically, the <strong>Town</strong> should<br />

target a level <strong>of</strong> provision <strong>of</strong> 0.5 ha per 1,000 for<br />

Parkettes <strong>and</strong> Neighbourhood <strong>Parks</strong> (combined), 0.5 ha<br />

per 1,000 for Community <strong>Parks</strong>, <strong>and</strong> 1.0 ha per 1,000 for<br />

<strong>Town</strong>‐wide <strong>Parks</strong>.<br />

To meet long‐term dem<strong>and</strong> for parkl<strong>and</strong> as<br />

recommended through the revised provision st<strong>and</strong>ards in<br />

this <strong>Master</strong> <strong>Plan</strong>, the <strong>Town</strong> will have to acquire 2<br />

hectares <strong>of</strong> active parkl<strong>and</strong> by 2021, over <strong>and</strong> above<br />

current development plans.<br />

Over <strong>and</strong> above developments currently planned, the<br />

<strong>Town</strong> should focus its efforts on augmenting supplies <strong>of</strong><br />

Community <strong>and</strong> Open Space <strong>Parks</strong>.<br />

MONTEITH BROWN PLANNING CONSULTANTS in association with Tucker‐Reid & Associates & The JF Group<br />

April 2008<br />

Page 43


<strong>Recreation</strong>, <strong>Parks</strong> & <strong>Culture</strong> Facilities<br />

Parkl<strong>and</strong> Acquisition<br />

Under the terms <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Plan</strong>ning Act, the <strong>Town</strong>’s Official <strong>Plan</strong><br />

levies parkl<strong>and</strong> dedications at a rate <strong>of</strong> 5% <strong>of</strong> developed l<strong>and</strong> or at<br />

1.0 hectares per 300 dwelling units. The st<strong>and</strong>ard which conveys<br />

the <strong>Town</strong> the most favourable supply <strong>of</strong> parkl<strong>and</strong> should be<br />

utilized in cases where the <strong>Town</strong> intends to develop l<strong>and</strong>s for park<br />

purposes. Given the <strong>Town</strong>’s limited base <strong>of</strong> developable l<strong>and</strong>, the<br />

latter st<strong>and</strong>ard is expected to be utilized more frequently as the<br />

<strong>Town</strong> encourages higher density development <strong>and</strong> intensification<br />

<strong>of</strong> existing areas. Where additional parkl<strong>and</strong> is not required, cashin‐lieu<br />

should continue to be collected.<br />

• municipal purchase or lease <strong>of</strong> l<strong>and</strong>;<br />

• encouraging the development <strong>of</strong> parkl<strong>and</strong> over <strong>and</strong><br />

above <strong>Plan</strong>ning Act m<strong>and</strong>ates by employing a densitybonusing<br />

system (this is more relevant in the future<br />

when development focuses upon intensification);<br />

• l<strong>and</strong> exchanges / swaps, particularly if development is to<br />

occur in natural areas highly valued by the community;<br />

• <strong>of</strong>f‐site conveyance <strong>of</strong> parkl<strong>and</strong>;<br />

• establishing a <strong>Parks</strong> Foundation (i.e. community,<br />

corporate <strong>and</strong>/or municipal donations to be put toward<br />

parkl<strong>and</strong> acquisition);<br />

• reallocating surplus municipal l<strong>and</strong>s to parks use;<br />

• seek to purchase “over‐dedication” <strong>of</strong> parkl<strong>and</strong><br />

associated with new development <strong>and</strong>/or infill areas; <strong>and</strong><br />

• partnership / joint provision <strong>of</strong> l<strong>and</strong>s with community<br />

partners.<br />

To guide the parkl<strong>and</strong> acquisition process, the development <strong>of</strong> a<br />

formal framework, protocol or set <strong>of</strong> criteria can help the <strong>Plan</strong>ning<br />

& Development <strong>and</strong> Operations/Environmental Services<br />

Departments to ensure that parks are acquired in a manner that is<br />

<strong>of</strong> maximum benefit to the <strong>Town</strong> <strong>and</strong> its residents. Employing a<br />

proactive “l<strong>and</strong> banking” model can also serve to minimize the<br />

costs associated with purchasing l<strong>and</strong>s at future market rates, an<br />

especially relevant consideration given the GTA’s rapidly inflating<br />

real estate prices.<br />

It is unlikely that parkl<strong>and</strong> dedications alone will fulfill the dem<strong>and</strong><br />

for municipal parks, especially at the Community <strong>and</strong> <strong>Town</strong>‐wide<br />

level, as well as for Open Spaces. For this reason, the <strong>Town</strong> will<br />

have to continue to employ a number <strong>of</strong> alternative acquisition<br />

initiatives to maintain an acceptable supply <strong>of</strong> parkl<strong>and</strong>. A few<br />

alternative acquisition measures to consider, among others, may<br />

include:<br />

In addition to the park l<strong>and</strong> acquisition process, the <strong>Town</strong> should<br />

also investigate parkl<strong>and</strong> renewal <strong>and</strong> redevelopment<br />

opportunities at its existing parks. For example, redevelopment<br />

opportunities at urban parks (i.e. St. Andrew’s Park, any l<strong>and</strong>s<br />

becoming available in the downtown area, etc.) can be oriented<br />

to respond to neighbourhood <strong>and</strong> community‐specific dem<strong>and</strong>s<br />

such as urban parks, plazas <strong>and</strong> squares in addition to traditional<br />

parkl<strong>and</strong> facilities.<br />

MONTEITH BROWN PLANNING CONSULTANTS in association with Tucker‐Reid & Associates & The JF Group<br />

April 2008<br />

Page 44


<strong>Recreation</strong>, <strong>Parks</strong> & <strong>Culture</strong> Facilities<br />

Action <strong>Plan</strong>s:<br />

Where shortfalls may occur in parkl<strong>and</strong> acquisition<br />

through the development process, the <strong>Town</strong> should<br />

employ a range <strong>of</strong> alternative parkl<strong>and</strong> acquisition<br />

mechanisms to obtain the necessary amount <strong>of</strong> acreage.<br />

To meet the long term dem<strong>and</strong> for passive parkl<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong><br />

nature trails, the <strong>Town</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Ajax</strong> should focus its efforts on<br />

the procurement <strong>of</strong> environmentally significant spaces,<br />

especially as it relates to trail connectivity.<br />

In order to develop effective l<strong>and</strong> acquisition strategies,<br />

there will be a need for continual communication <strong>and</strong><br />

collaboration between <strong>Recreation</strong> Services, <strong>Plan</strong>ning &<br />

Development Services, Operations & Environmental<br />

Services, <strong>and</strong> Economic Development Services.<br />

Parkl<strong>and</strong> Design & Amenities<br />

Through park design, a number <strong>of</strong> amenities are provided at<br />

municipal parks which enhance the user experience <strong>and</strong> allow the<br />

parks to be used for different functions. Common amenities<br />

include public washrooms, pavilions <strong>and</strong> shelters, stages/b<strong>and</strong><br />

shells, picnic areas <strong>and</strong> barbeque pits. Signage also plays an<br />

important role in the user experience.<br />

Design & Programming<br />

A greater emphasis should be placed on providing more informal<br />

space in new parks in order to promote unstructured <strong>and</strong><br />

organized activities, as well as emerging interests. The design <strong>of</strong><br />

active <strong>and</strong> passive parks should also incorporate elements that<br />

cater to individual physical activity <strong>and</strong> wellness, through features<br />

such as exercise / stretching stations, personal reflection /<br />

meditation gardens, vertical differentials along pathways (i.e. hilly<br />

terrain, stair zones with associated wheelchair ramps), etc.<br />

New <strong>and</strong> existing parks should continue to be designed with<br />

patrons’ safety in mind through the application <strong>of</strong> CPTED (Crime<br />

Prevention Through Environmental Design) <strong>and</strong> other design<br />

principles. High volume areas should be well lit, limited visibility<br />

areas should be limited, <strong>and</strong> neighbourhood level parks should be<br />

designed so that surrounding residents <strong>and</strong> streets have visibility<br />

into the park, thus discouraging illicit activities.<br />

Maintenance <strong>of</strong> parks <strong>and</strong> open spaces is now accepted in the<br />

industry as a key component <strong>of</strong> perceived “safety” in parks <strong>and</strong> in<br />

deterring inappropriate behaviour. To augment park security<br />

services provided by the <strong>Town</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Ajax</strong>, the establishment <strong>of</strong> a<br />

citizens watch or ambassador program is also recommended to<br />

engage the community to help watch over parks for illegal<br />

activities, functioning similar to a Neighbourhood Watch program<br />

or community patrol. Any community‐based watch program<br />

which is implemented should be designed in consultation with the<br />

Durham Regional Police Services (<strong>and</strong>/or other appropriate safety<br />

<strong>and</strong> enforcement agencies) prior to engaging citizens to actively<br />

watch/patrol parks.<br />

Environmental Integration<br />

In recent years, the trend to<br />

integrate natural features into<br />

park settings has been<br />

increasing, as environmental<br />

protection becomes<br />

increasingly recognized by<br />

society. <strong>Ajax</strong> has a number <strong>of</strong><br />

significant ecological areas,<br />

particularly riparian zones<br />

along the creek systems<br />

draining along the Lake<br />

Ontario shoreline. Many<br />

municipalities are providing<br />

passive areas that incorporate<br />

native plant species, conserve<br />

MONTEITH BROWN PLANNING CONSULTANTS in association with Tucker‐Reid & Associates & The JF Group<br />

April 2008<br />

Page 45


<strong>Recreation</strong>, <strong>Parks</strong> & <strong>Culture</strong> Facilities<br />

woodlots, <strong>and</strong> ensuring that certain areas <strong>of</strong> new active parks<br />

remain in a natural state. With the interest in outdoor recreation,<br />

many municipalities are also designing parks to include provisions<br />

for bird watching, wildlife viewing <strong>and</strong> capitalizing on eco‐tourism<br />

opportunities. As per the Corporate Strategic <strong>Plan</strong> (2007), the<br />

<strong>Town</strong> should actively promote new plantings <strong>of</strong> native plant<br />

species as part <strong>of</strong> its parks design process in order to increase<br />

forest cover, support wildlife corridors <strong>and</strong> improve air quality.<br />

The Restoration & Naturalization <strong>Plan</strong> should also be referenced<br />

when integrating natural environment features into parkl<strong>and</strong><br />

design.<br />

Comfort Facilities<br />

Regarding more active use parks, wherever possible, the <strong>Town</strong><br />

should cluster the same type <strong>of</strong> playing fields together to increase<br />

a sense <strong>of</strong> form <strong>and</strong> function. Such parks should also include<br />

washrooms, electrical outlets, benches <strong>and</strong> safe, pedestrianfriendly<br />

pathways, etc. The <strong>Town</strong> currently provides washroom<br />

facilities (permanent or portable) at 15 park sites. Washrooms are<br />

generally provided at parks where major sporting facilities (e.g.,<br />

soccer fields, ball diamonds) are located <strong>and</strong> along key<br />

destinations in the greenways system. Opportunity may exist to<br />

construct washrooms at Paradise Park, which would not only<br />

benefit park users but also trail users along the Waterfront Trail.<br />

The <strong>Town</strong> should continue to consider permanent or portable<br />

washroom facilities at heavily utilized park <strong>and</strong> trail locations as<br />

these conveniences can attract a greater use by individuals <strong>and</strong><br />

families.<br />

Picnic Amenities<br />

In terms <strong>of</strong> picnicking, the <strong>Town</strong> provides picnic tables at nine<br />

parks <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong>fers shelters / pavilions at fifteen parks which <strong>of</strong>fer a<br />

venue for gatherings. The <strong>Town</strong> has approved the provision <strong>of</strong> a<br />

larger pavilion‐type facility at Greenwood Conservation Area to<br />

provide a rain‐out venue for the summer camps <strong>and</strong> programs<br />

operated at this location. Although the Department operates out<br />

<strong>of</strong> a similar facility at Paulynn Park, a new facility at Greenwood<br />

will provide another venue to accommodate the ever‐increasing<br />

dem<strong>and</strong> for summer programs (<strong>and</strong> could also allow the<br />

Department to exp<strong>and</strong> the Neighbourhood Programs & Active<br />

Living Day Camp program) <strong>and</strong> interest in other outdoor leisure<br />

pursuits in a manner which complements the educational nature<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Conservation Area. It is recommended that this facility also<br />

be designed to include <strong>of</strong>fice space to allow for the provision <strong>of</strong><br />

on‐site staff resources, winterized washroom.<br />

Signage<br />

The provision <strong>of</strong> appropriate signage is another key component <strong>of</strong><br />

good park <strong>and</strong> trail<br />

design. Signage is an<br />

important element in<br />

promoting recognition<br />

<strong>and</strong> stewardship in the<br />

community. Without<br />

proper <strong>and</strong> consistent<br />

signage, park users may<br />

be confused about the<br />

property’s ownership.<br />

Signage is also important<br />

as part <strong>of</strong> the tourism<br />

infrastructure that<br />

directs tourists easily to destinations <strong>and</strong> encourages them to<br />

return because <strong>of</strong> the ease <strong>of</strong> travel – they are also one <strong>of</strong> the first<br />

impressions <strong>of</strong> a site. Signs develop a sense <strong>of</strong> place <strong>and</strong><br />

combined with good urban design, can create unique districts (i.e.<br />

Pickering Village) <strong>and</strong> foster aesthetic development. They also<br />

provide interpretive information that connects a user to the park<br />

<strong>and</strong> may encourage the person to take further interest in their<br />

surroundings. A good sign is clear, attractive <strong>and</strong> designed in<br />

context to its surroundings (in this case, parks <strong>and</strong> open spaces).<br />

MONTEITH BROWN PLANNING CONSULTANTS in association with Tucker‐Reid & Associates & The JF Group<br />

April 2008<br />

Page 46


<strong>Recreation</strong>, <strong>Parks</strong> & <strong>Culture</strong> Facilities<br />

Action <strong>Plan</strong>s:<br />

Provisions to incorporate spaces <strong>and</strong> amenities<br />

encouraging physical activity, wellness <strong>and</strong> informal use<br />

opportunities should be paramount considerations in the<br />

design <strong>of</strong> parks in order to encourage use <strong>and</strong> facilitate<br />

activity levels.<br />

The <strong>Town</strong> should continue to design parks that<br />

incorporate natural, indigenous vegetation features in<br />

order to foster an appreciation for such areas <strong>and</strong><br />

maintain crucial ecological functions.<br />

Public washroom facilities (through a combination <strong>of</strong><br />

permanent <strong>and</strong> portable facilities) should continue to be<br />

provided at heavily utilized parks <strong>and</strong> key trailheads<br />

along the greenway systems.<br />

The <strong>Town</strong> should proceed with the construction <strong>of</strong> a<br />

pavilion‐type facility at Greenwood Park that contains<br />

winterized washrooms, <strong>of</strong>fice space <strong>and</strong> shelter from the<br />

rain in order to enhance the quality <strong>of</strong> programs <strong>of</strong>fered<br />

at this location. Should usage <strong>of</strong> existing picnic pavilions<br />

be at capacity for summer weekends, the <strong>Town</strong> should<br />

construct an additional pavilion at an appropriate<br />

location (e.g. natural parks such as those along the<br />

waterfront <strong>and</strong> in greenbelt systems, Millers Creek Park,<br />

Sportsplex Park, St. Andrew’s Park, etc.).<br />

To ensure that safety concerns do not become a barrier<br />

to park usage, the <strong>Town</strong> should continue to incorporate<br />

CPTED principles in park design <strong>and</strong> facilitate ambassador<br />

programs in consultation with the local police<br />

department to encourage civic participation in keeping<br />

local parks free <strong>of</strong> undesirable behaviours.<br />

Ensure that adequate signage exists at all municipal<br />

parks, trailheads (with appropriate routing information)<br />

<strong>and</strong> recreation <strong>and</strong> cultural facilities. These signs should<br />

be restored or replaced when they deteriorate.<br />

3.6 Natural Environment L<strong>and</strong>s<br />

With an ever‐increasing amount <strong>of</strong> public attention being cast to<br />

environmental issues, Canadians are becoming more informed<br />

regarding their roles in environmental stewardship <strong>and</strong> are<br />

desiring parks <strong>and</strong> open spaces near the places in which they live.<br />

Opinion polls <strong>and</strong> other forms <strong>of</strong> research suggest that parks play<br />

an important role in community development, public safety,<br />

tourism <strong>and</strong> overall quality <strong>of</strong> life.<br />

It is a goal <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Town</strong>’s Official <strong>Plan</strong> to establish an ecosystembased<br />

approach to planning <strong>and</strong> development. <strong>Ajax</strong> <strong>Town</strong> Council<br />

recently approved the Restoration <strong>and</strong> Naturalization <strong>Plan</strong> (RNP),<br />

which sits alongside a number <strong>of</strong> other documents reflecting the<br />

values placed by the <strong>Town</strong> <strong>and</strong> its residents on naturally<br />

significant l<strong>and</strong>s. The RNP’s actions are expected to be fully<br />

realized by the year 2010, therefore, the <strong>Town</strong> should consider<br />

the continuation <strong>of</strong> the RNP’s implementation program beyond<br />

2010 through the update <strong>of</strong> this particular <strong>Plan</strong> around the year<br />

2009.<br />

MONTEITH BROWN PLANNING CONSULTANTS in association with Tucker‐Reid & Associates & The JF Group<br />

April 2008<br />

Page 47


<strong>Recreation</strong>, <strong>Parks</strong> & <strong>Culture</strong> Facilities<br />

The <strong>Town</strong> has done an excellent job in preserving key natural<br />

areas within its boundary. Greenwood Conservation Area (GCA) is<br />

a major natural area managed by the <strong>Town</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Ajax</strong> <strong>and</strong> has<br />

successfully integrated certain active uses within a passive park<br />

setting (i.e. soccer fields, <strong>of</strong>f‐leash dog park). The GCA is a<br />

valuable part <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Town</strong>’s natural heritage inventory <strong>and</strong> is a key<br />

indicator <strong>of</strong> ecosystem health for the entire subwatershed system.<br />

The <strong>Town</strong> should continue to maintain <strong>and</strong> monitor this naturally<br />

significant area, <strong>and</strong> make every attempt to ensure that<br />

urbanization <strong>and</strong> development pressures do not adversely affect<br />

the ecological function by maintaining adjacent l<strong>and</strong> use<br />

designations for rural purposes.<br />

The Duffins Bay Greenbelt, Millers Creek Greenway, Achilles Road<br />

Greenbelt <strong>and</strong> <strong>Ajax</strong> Greenbelt have created linear corridors <strong>of</strong><br />

natural areas that recognize system‐wide ecological processes in<br />

an attempt to ensure natural functions are not compromised in<br />

the face <strong>of</strong> urban development. Through the l<strong>and</strong> acquisition<br />

process, the <strong>Town</strong> should continue to exp<strong>and</strong> these greenbelt<br />

systems to promote ecological corridors as well as potential trail<br />

routes for passive leisure activities. These, <strong>and</strong> other natural areas<br />

such as the GCA, also have the potential to develop nature‐based<br />

tourism opportunities that encourage family recreation,<br />

environmental underst<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>and</strong> stewardship, <strong>and</strong> possibly draw<br />

out‐<strong>of</strong>‐town residents to <strong>Ajax</strong> in appreciation <strong>of</strong> local natural<br />

heritage features.<br />

Action <strong>Plan</strong>s:<br />

Continue to implement the recommendations <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Greenwood Conservation Area Management <strong>Plan</strong>.<br />

Upon implementation <strong>of</strong> actions contained in the<br />

Restoration <strong>and</strong> Naturalization <strong>Plan</strong> (expected by 2010),<br />

the <strong>Town</strong> should consider the continuation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

implementation program beyond 2010 through the<br />

update <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Plan</strong>.<br />

Continue to exp<strong>and</strong> upon the existing greenbelt systems<br />

as a means to develop corridors that serve ecological <strong>and</strong><br />

passive recreational purposes.<br />

Continually develop innovative <strong>and</strong> engaging initiatives,<br />

in partnership with local conservation authorities <strong>and</strong><br />

other experts in environmental management, that<br />

encourage environmental stewardship <strong>and</strong> the role <strong>of</strong><br />

individuals in maintaining <strong>and</strong> enhancing ecological<br />

systems in <strong>Ajax</strong>.<br />

The success <strong>of</strong> developing a sustainable parks system is achieved<br />

on both a governmental <strong>and</strong> an individual level, therefore,<br />

educating the public <strong>and</strong> promoting the benefits <strong>of</strong> parks is key to<br />

facilitating environmental stewardship. The <strong>Town</strong>, in conjunction<br />

with local conservation authorities such as the TRCA, should<br />

continue to develop environmental education initiatives that<br />

inform the community about the role <strong>of</strong> the individual in<br />

enhancing ecological processes <strong>and</strong> teach them how to live<br />

sustainably within their immediate environment.<br />

MONTEITH BROWN PLANNING CONSULTANTS in association with Tucker‐Reid & Associates & The JF Group<br />

April 2008<br />

Page 48


Service Delivery<br />

Chapter 4: Service Delivery<br />

4.1 Vision Statement<br />

The purpose <strong>of</strong> a municipal vision statement is to express what<br />

<strong>Town</strong> Council, municipal staff <strong>and</strong> community stakeholders are<br />

striving for in the community. The <strong>Town</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Ajax</strong> developed its<br />

vision statement with full consultation with its residents <strong>and</strong><br />

businesses.<br />

<br />

<strong>Town</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Ajax</strong> Community Vision Statement:<br />

A Vibrant <strong>and</strong> Caring Community<br />

where people <strong>and</strong> history connect<br />

Surrounded by Natural Beauty<br />

where open spaces <strong>and</strong> unique l<strong>and</strong>scapes set us apart<br />

Rich in Opportunity<br />

where ideas <strong>and</strong> innovation flourish<br />

Experience it – <strong>Ajax</strong><br />

<br />

The <strong>Town</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Ajax</strong> is strategic in all <strong>of</strong> its endeavours to support a<br />

healthy, vibrant <strong>and</strong> beautiful community. Residents <strong>and</strong><br />

businesses are encouraged to balance their lives <strong>and</strong> participate in<br />

a range <strong>of</strong> leisure‐related choices that are either directly provided<br />

by the <strong>Town</strong> or through a great host <strong>of</strong> community organizations.<br />

<strong>Recreation</strong>, parks <strong>and</strong> cultural services play a large role in making<br />

<strong>Ajax</strong> a community that is healthy, rich in opportunity <strong>and</strong> socially<br />

cohesive.<br />

4.2 Mission Statement – <strong>Recreation</strong> Services<br />

Mission statements are meant to be succinct statements<br />

capturing what the department does, the people it serves <strong>and</strong> a<br />

brief description about how it goes about its work. It is proposed<br />

that the Departmental mission statement would read as follows<br />

below.<br />

<br />

<strong>Recreation</strong> Services Department Mission Statement:<br />

“<strong>Recreation</strong> Services is committed to providing<br />

quality programs, services <strong>and</strong> facilities that<br />

create opportunities to strengthen individuals,<br />

families <strong>and</strong> the community.”<br />

<br />

4.3 Service Rationalization & Priorities<br />

The Role <strong>of</strong> Community Development in Providing Services<br />

The Departments <strong>of</strong> <strong>Recreation</strong> Services <strong>and</strong> Operations <strong>and</strong><br />

Environmental Services support both the direct provision <strong>and</strong><br />

facilitation <strong>of</strong> services by employing a community development<br />

model <strong>and</strong> approach. The approach provides support to<br />

community groups <strong>and</strong> builds capacity in the community to<br />

provide their own programs <strong>and</strong> services. Where there is no<br />

capacity or local expertise, the Departments provide the services<br />

directly to the community.<br />

MONTEITH BROWN PLANNING CONSULTANTS in association with Tucker‐Reid & Associates & The JF Group<br />

April 2008<br />

Page 49


Service Delivery<br />

Departmental Values<br />

Values speak to the st<strong>and</strong>ards, morals, ethics <strong>and</strong> ideals while<br />

delivering services. They must be incorporated into all actions <strong>and</strong><br />

services provided. High performing organizations ensure that the<br />

values provide ongoing guidance to all those engaged in the<br />

delivery <strong>of</strong> recreation, parks <strong>and</strong> cultural services.<br />

We Communicate, are Visible <strong>and</strong> Easily Accessible<br />

• We are coordinated <strong>and</strong> share leadership with likeminded<br />

service providers<br />

• We promote two way conversations with staff,<br />

volunteers <strong>and</strong> stakeholders<br />

• We strive to meet community needs through continual<br />

consultation <strong>and</strong> dialogue<br />

• We seek advice from our advisory committees<br />

We Embrace Honesty <strong>and</strong> Integrity<br />

• We are transparent in our decision making<br />

• We demonstrate accountability <strong>and</strong> responsibility<br />

• We use our energies <strong>and</strong> resources wisely<br />

• We measure our performance<br />

• We have a long term commitment to our work <strong>and</strong> strive<br />

to see positive results<br />

We are Socially Responsible<br />

• We have respect for ourselves <strong>and</strong> each other<br />

• We are inclusive <strong>and</strong> are culturally sensitive<br />

• We take different approaches to ensure equitable access<br />

to under‐represented groups<br />

• We are community focused<br />

• We protect the earth<br />

We Embrace Innovation, Quality <strong>and</strong> Safety<br />

• We engage <strong>and</strong> involve our residents <strong>and</strong> businesses<br />

• We have a desire to be leading edge <strong>and</strong> continuously<br />

improve<br />

• Staff are empowered to be the experts in their field <strong>of</strong><br />

knowledge<br />

• Each experience is safe <strong>and</strong> is delivered with quality<br />

st<strong>and</strong>ards<br />

• We reward excellence <strong>and</strong> innovative approaches<br />

Priorities in Service Delivery<br />

Determining service priorities is an exercise that should be<br />

revisited each year prior to the capital <strong>and</strong> operating budget<br />

development exercise. Re‐adjusting resource allocations is critical<br />

in a climate where base funding is not increasing substantially <strong>and</strong><br />

resources need to be maximized in order to garner the greatest<br />

gain to the community. Factors that might change priorities year<br />

to year would include:<br />

• emerging trends<br />

• pent up dem<strong>and</strong>s<br />

• public input<br />

• available resources<br />

• demographic changes<br />

• changing service st<strong>and</strong>ards<br />

• new legislation <strong>and</strong> other local requirements<br />

Based on public <strong>and</strong> staff input <strong>and</strong> the findings <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Master</strong><br />

<strong>Plan</strong>, the following service objectives should hold priority over the<br />

course <strong>of</strong> the next five years in terms <strong>of</strong> focus <strong>and</strong> resources. It<br />

must be clarified that these services should generate some no<br />

cost / low cost opportunities <strong>and</strong> be funded to a certain extent<br />

through the tax base. The remaining service objectives should<br />

receive greater funding through user fees or other funding<br />

mechanisms.<br />

MONTEITH BROWN PLANNING CONSULTANTS in association with Tucker‐Reid & Associates & The JF Group<br />

April 2008<br />

Page 50


Service Delivery<br />

The following Service Priorities are suggested for the years 2008<br />

to 2013:<br />

1. Encouraging community events <strong>and</strong> festivals (public good)<br />

2. Proactively encouraging <strong>and</strong> supporting partnerships with<br />

community stakeholders (public good)<br />

3. Providing opportunities <strong>and</strong> encouraging residents to lead<br />

active lives (public good)<br />

4. Protecting <strong>and</strong> enhancing the natural environment.<br />

Engaging residents in enhancing the environment (public<br />

good)<br />

5. Promoting exposure <strong>and</strong> appreciation <strong>of</strong> cultural<br />

experiences (public good)<br />

6. Providing <strong>and</strong> supporting family leisure opportunities<br />

(public good)<br />

7. Promoting <strong>and</strong> communicating the leisure opportunities<br />

available in the community (public good)<br />

8. Fostering <strong>and</strong> promoting skill development <strong>and</strong> leisure<br />

pursuits for youth (individual good)<br />

9. Enhancing a vibrant <strong>and</strong> attractive community (public good)<br />

10. Assisting, supporting <strong>and</strong> engaging diverse populations into<br />

the community for the public good<br />

11. Fostering <strong>and</strong> promoting skill development <strong>and</strong> leisure<br />

pursuits for older adults for the public good<br />

Departmental Name<br />

A decision should be made regarding the name <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Recreation</strong><br />

Services Department, as its purview also encompasses the<br />

provision <strong>of</strong> arts <strong>and</strong> cultural services. Incorporating the arts <strong>and</strong><br />

cultural term in the Departmental name would likely be a positive<br />

step in enhancing relationships with arts <strong>and</strong> cultural stakeholders<br />

in <strong>Ajax</strong> <strong>and</strong> may send a message that the <strong>Town</strong> considers cultural<br />

needs equitably in relation to sports <strong>and</strong> recreation services. As an<br />

example, the name “<strong>Recreation</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Culture</strong> Department” would<br />

be appropriate.<br />

4.4 Partnerships in Delivering Services<br />

The <strong>Town</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Ajax</strong>’s <strong>Recreation</strong> Services Department embraces a<br />

philosophy <strong>of</strong> providing services through partner organizations<br />

<strong>and</strong> rounding out any gaps in service through the direct service<br />

delivery. Staff within the department enable or facilitate the nonpr<strong>of</strong>it<br />

groups by providing guidance on governance, programs,<br />

operations, <strong>and</strong> volunteerism <strong>and</strong> through the provision <strong>of</strong><br />

facilities. Assisting groups to provide meaningful programs for<br />

residents is generally referred to as a “community development”<br />

approach (as discussed in the previous sub‐section) toward the<br />

provision <strong>of</strong> services or “indirect” programming.<br />

Developing Partnerships in the Delivery <strong>of</strong> Services<br />

Municipal <strong>Recreation</strong> Departments become involved in<br />

developing partnerships where clear advantages can be<br />

demonstrated to both the municipal organization <strong>and</strong> the<br />

taxpayer.<br />

The determination <strong>of</strong> need,<br />

assessment <strong>of</strong> inherent or<br />

potential risks, identification<br />

<strong>of</strong> adequately equipped<br />

community partners that<br />

could be involved in the<br />

service delivery <strong>and</strong> an<br />

assessment <strong>of</strong> the necessary<br />

attributes required to be<br />

involved in program<br />

provision are all necessary<br />

precursors to shaping<br />

service delivery approaches.<br />

MONTEITH BROWN PLANNING CONSULTANTS in association with Tucker‐Reid & Associates & The JF Group<br />

April 2008<br />

Page 51


Service Delivery<br />

The following model illustrates a<br />

sample framework or decision‐making<br />

process that could assist in selecting<br />

from the two delivery approaches.<br />

By formalizing the decision framework<br />

as demonstrated in the example,<br />

defining “who does what” should<br />

involve an assessment <strong>of</strong> the<br />

requirements <strong>of</strong> the service, activity or<br />

program in question to ensure that the<br />

responsible party is adequately<br />

equipped to be successful.<br />

This might result in the identification <strong>of</strong><br />

new or additional supports that the<br />

Department should provide to<br />

volunteer groups or opportunities<br />

where organizations (both non‐pr<strong>of</strong>it or<br />

private) can become more effective<br />

with increased assistance from<br />

municipal staff. In other words, if the<br />

indirect delivery approach is identified<br />

as the most appropriate direction for a<br />

particular project, the Department’s<br />

role changes from a program delivery to<br />

a support function. This may require<br />

the deployment <strong>of</strong> different types <strong>of</strong> resources <strong>and</strong> it might be<br />

necessary for staff to acquire new types <strong>of</strong> skills in order to<br />

effectively nurture <strong>and</strong> support partnering <strong>and</strong> development <strong>of</strong><br />

community groups.<br />

Is the program consistent with the municipal<br />

m<strong>and</strong>ate <strong>and</strong> service philosophy Yes No<br />

▼ ►<br />

Is there a municipal role to play in providing<br />

the program or service Yes No<br />

▼ ►<br />

Is there demonstrated community need for<br />

the proposed service or program Yes No<br />

▼ ►<br />

Can operating specifications ensure<br />

adherence to municipal service st<strong>and</strong>ards Yes No<br />

Can financial <strong>and</strong> liability risks be reasonably<br />

absorbed by non-municipal partners such as<br />

a community organization<br />

Are there suitably qualified or properly<br />

equipped community organizations willing to<br />

provide the service or program<br />

Can the delivery responsibility <strong>of</strong> the service<br />

or program be assigned to a community<br />

organization on a sole source basis<br />

Is there consensus regarding the terms,<br />

conditions, st<strong>and</strong>ard <strong>of</strong> delivery <strong>and</strong><br />

responsibilities <strong>of</strong> the service delivery agent –<br />

such as a community organization<br />

▼ ►<br />

Yes No<br />

▼ ►<br />

Yes No<br />

▼ ►<br />

Yes No<br />

▼ ►<br />

Yes No<br />

▼ ►<br />

Do not consider municipal<br />

involvement in the project.<br />

Do not consider municipal<br />

involvement in the project.<br />

Do not consider municipal<br />

involvement in the project.<br />

Consider providing the service<br />

using a traditional municipal self<br />

managed approach (direct).<br />

Consider providing the service<br />

using a traditional municipal self<br />

managed approach (direct).<br />

Consider providing the service<br />

using a traditional municipal self<br />

managed approach (direct).<br />

Issue a Request for Proposal or<br />

other procurement process<br />

specified by purchasing<br />

policies.<br />

Negotiate mutually acceptable<br />

operating <strong>and</strong> performance<br />

st<strong>and</strong>ards with a community<br />

organization.<br />

Establish a relationship with a community organization to deliver the program or service <strong>and</strong> adopt a<br />

new <strong>and</strong> mutually agreeable monitoring system.<br />

MONTEITH BROWN PLANNING CONSULTANTS in association with Tucker‐Reid & Associates & The JF Group<br />

April 2008<br />

Page 52


Service Delivery<br />

Criteria for Successful Partnerships<br />

<strong>Ajax</strong> has many successful partnership <strong>and</strong> stakeholder<br />

arrangements <strong>and</strong> has been thoughtful in determining what<br />

surrounds successful partnership/stakeholder arrangements.<br />

Specifically <strong>Ajax</strong> seeks to ensure that Partnerships <strong>and</strong><br />

Stakeholders:<br />

• Embrace common goals <strong>and</strong> audience;<br />

• Address current <strong>and</strong> emerging trends;<br />

• Align with the corporate vision, strategic plan initiatives;<br />

• Align with the departmental m<strong>and</strong>ate <strong>and</strong> core services;<br />

• Ensure that there is legislative compliance;<br />

• Provide cost avoidance or revenue enhancement to the<br />

department;<br />

• Articulate clear deliverables with timelines;<br />

• Address risk management considerations;<br />

• Have ongoing communications <strong>and</strong> a strong relationship<br />

with the department;<br />

• Sign <strong>of</strong>f on the terms, deliverables <strong>and</strong> an evaluation<br />

mechanism depicted in an agreement;<br />

• Hold flexibility to re‐visit the agreement; <strong>and</strong><br />

• Underst<strong>and</strong> as to how the agreement will be managed<br />

<strong>and</strong> a determination as to accountability <strong>and</strong><br />

responsibility <strong>of</strong> each deliverable.<br />

Action <strong>Plan</strong>s<br />

Based on the review <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Town</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Ajax</strong>’s <strong>Recreation</strong> Services<br />

Department’s provision <strong>of</strong> programs <strong>and</strong> services through<br />

partnerships, it is recommended that:<br />

The Department prioritize the partnership framework<br />

plan to serve in enhancing service <strong>and</strong> program provision<br />

through partnership/stakeholders. Further preliminary<br />

discussions take place with representatives from the<br />

various <strong>and</strong> recommended partner/stakeholder groups.<br />

That all staff serving partner <strong>and</strong> stakeholder groups<br />

meet to discuss approaches that may lessen the burden<br />

on the partners <strong>and</strong> stakeholders <strong>and</strong> provide “one stop<br />

shopping”.<br />

The Department review the staff <strong>and</strong> other resources<br />

that are dedicated to developing <strong>and</strong> nurturing<br />

relationships versus the resources utilized to develop <strong>and</strong><br />

deliver programs <strong>and</strong> services directly. The purpose <strong>of</strong><br />

the review is to align resources equitably <strong>and</strong>/or<br />

determine the need for additional resources to develop<br />

<strong>and</strong> strengthen partnerships.<br />

The Department determine the skill sets <strong>and</strong><br />

competencies needed to develop <strong>and</strong> nurture<br />

partnerships <strong>and</strong> seek training <strong>and</strong> develop where it may<br />

be required.<br />

The Department proactively seek out partners to<br />

alleviate the capital <strong>and</strong> operating burden that may be<br />

realized through the facility developments <strong>and</strong> program<br />

enhancements recommended through the <strong>Master</strong> <strong>Plan</strong>.<br />

The Department list all stakeholder <strong>and</strong> partner groups in<br />

the <strong>Recreation</strong> Guide to promote the full range <strong>of</strong><br />

opportunities <strong>and</strong> choice.<br />

Future potential partnership arrangements consider the<br />

decision making protocol suggested in this report <strong>and</strong><br />

further that all future service agreements be aligned with<br />

the priorities outlined in the strategic plan document.<br />

That the impact <strong>and</strong> cost avoidance <strong>and</strong>/or additional<br />

revenues realized as a result <strong>of</strong> supporting partners <strong>and</strong><br />

community groups be reported annually to Council <strong>and</strong><br />

the community.<br />

MONTEITH BROWN PLANNING CONSULTANTS in association with Tucker‐Reid & Associates & The JF Group<br />

April 2008<br />

Page 53


Service Delivery<br />

4.5 Operational Impacts <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Master</strong> <strong>Plan</strong><br />

The <strong>Master</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> sets the course for facility, park <strong>and</strong> open space<br />

development, program enhancements <strong>and</strong> expansion, community<br />

engagement strategies <strong>and</strong> the furthering <strong>of</strong> partnership<br />

arrangements. Staff will set about to create some efficiencies<br />

through sponsorships <strong>and</strong> volunteerism to address these<br />

additional fiscal requirements <strong>of</strong> the Department but it is not<br />

anticipated the full containment <strong>of</strong> costs can be met. In order to<br />

meet the needs <strong>of</strong> the current trends <strong>and</strong> public expectations<br />

regarding exp<strong>and</strong>ed services, staff must determine the human<br />

resource <strong>and</strong> material requirements to fully implement the plan<br />

from an operational perspective.<br />

The capital expenditures have been prioritized <strong>and</strong> proposed over<br />

a number <strong>of</strong> years to respond to the respective needs <strong>of</strong> residents<br />

<strong>and</strong> community groups in a given year. It is recommended that<br />

staff develop a five year operational fiscal plan that complements<br />

the capital projections <strong>and</strong> responds to maintaining staffing levels,<br />

spans <strong>of</strong> control <strong>and</strong> service st<strong>and</strong>ards <strong>and</strong> articulates the<br />

operational impacts <strong>of</strong> the phasing in <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Master</strong> <strong>Plan</strong><br />

recommendations.<br />

Action <strong>Plan</strong>s<br />

A five year operational fiscal plan is required to fully<br />

address the human resource <strong>and</strong> material impacts <strong>of</strong><br />

implementing the <strong>Master</strong> <strong>Plan</strong>’s actions in a manner<br />

which also complements capital projections as they<br />

relate to staffing levels.<br />

MONTEITH BROWN PLANNING CONSULTANTS in association with Tucker‐Reid & Associates & The JF Group<br />

April 2008<br />

Page 54


Implementation<br />

Chapter 5: Implementation<br />

This Section provides a phased implementation <strong>and</strong> financing<br />

schedule, through to the year 2021, to guide the <strong>Town</strong> in acting<br />

upon each Action <strong>Plan</strong> contained in the <strong>Recreation</strong>, <strong>Parks</strong> &<br />

<strong>Culture</strong> <strong>Master</strong> <strong>Plan</strong>. Also contained is a process for monitoring<br />

<strong>and</strong> updating the <strong>Master</strong> <strong>Plan</strong>.<br />

5.1 Monitoring<br />

The <strong>Town</strong> should continue to review <strong>and</strong> assess the Action <strong>Plan</strong>s<br />

set out in this document in order to ensure that they remain<br />

relevant. This will require monitoring <strong>of</strong> recreation <strong>and</strong> cultural<br />

activity patterns, conducting annual review <strong>of</strong> the achievements<br />

<strong>of</strong> the plan, tracking satisfaction levels <strong>of</strong> residents <strong>and</strong><br />

customers, <strong>and</strong> undertaking a new <strong>Master</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> at the end <strong>of</strong> the<br />

planning period (<strong>and</strong>/or an update to this <strong>Plan</strong> within the next five<br />

to seven years).<br />

5.2 Implementation Schedule<br />

The following pages contain a summary <strong>of</strong> action plans contained<br />

within this Needs Assessment Report. They are organized broadly<br />

in terms <strong>of</strong> the park or type <strong>of</strong> facility in which they are expected<br />

to occur. Furthermore, these action plans are differentiated into<br />

facility‐specific <strong>and</strong> programming/policy‐related tables. The timing<br />

<strong>of</strong> the action plans fall into three categories:<br />

• Short‐Term – 2008 to 2011<br />

• Mid‐Term – 2012 to 2016<br />

• Long‐Term – 2017 to 2021<br />

Prioritization <strong>of</strong> Action <strong>Plan</strong>s falls under three broad categories:<br />

• High Priority items necessitate immediate attention<br />

(within the prescribed time period)<br />

• Medium Priority items necessitate attention when high<br />

priority actions have been initiated or completed, or<br />

when suitable partners have been identified for funding.<br />

• Low Priority items require attention when all other<br />

priority actions have been initiated or completed.<br />

Furthermore, action plans are ranked within their respective<br />

categories (i.e. facility‐specific, programming <strong>and</strong> policies, <strong>and</strong><br />

requiring further study) using a matrix that considers:<br />

• Level <strong>of</strong> risk;<br />

• Capital <strong>and</strong> operating costs which would be incurred;<br />

• Congruence with goals, objectives <strong>and</strong> consultations;<br />

• Alignment with demographics <strong>and</strong> trends;<br />

• Ability to increase participation / use;<br />

• Number <strong>of</strong> residents that would be positively affected;<br />

• Opportunity for partnerships/shared responsibility; <strong>and</strong><br />

• Timing.<br />

MONTEITH BROWN PLANNING CONSULTANTS in association with Tucker‐Reid & Associates & The JF Group<br />

April 2008<br />

Page 55


Implementation<br />

5.2.1 Summary <strong>of</strong> Facility‐Specific Targets<br />

ID #<br />

Action <strong>Plan</strong><br />

1 The <strong>Town</strong> should utilize targets in conjunction with other important factors, including trends, spatial <strong>and</strong> usage data, degree <strong>of</strong> “pent‐up” dem<strong>and</strong>,<br />

<strong>and</strong> population growth in respective age groups to make informed decisions pertaining to facility‐based dem<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> before finalizing capital<br />

investment.<br />

The <strong>Town</strong> adopt a target <strong>of</strong> one ice pad per 800 registered participants when determining the level <strong>of</strong> service required for ice sports in <strong>Ajax</strong>.<br />

The <strong>Town</strong> adopt a provision target <strong>of</strong> one municipal indoor aquatic facility per 40,000 residents when determining the level <strong>of</strong> service<br />

required for indoor aquatics in <strong>Ajax</strong>.<br />

The <strong>Town</strong> adopt a provision target <strong>of</strong> one municipal gymnasium per 50,000 residents when determining the level <strong>of</strong> service for gymnasium<br />

needs. The <strong>Town</strong> should also make every effort to maintain community access to school gyms to serve any neighbourhood‐level dem<strong>and</strong>s.<br />

The <strong>Town</strong> should adopt provision target <strong>of</strong> one soccer field per 90 registered players as a means to evaluate dem<strong>and</strong> for soccer.<br />

The <strong>Town</strong> should adopt provision target <strong>of</strong> one ball diamond per 100 players as a means to evaluate dem<strong>and</strong> for ball.<br />

The <strong>Town</strong> adopt a level <strong>of</strong> service <strong>of</strong> one tennis court per 5,000 residents <strong>and</strong> adopt a level <strong>of</strong> service <strong>of</strong> one full basketball court (or<br />

equivalent) per 1,000 youth aged 10 to 19 to provide an indication <strong>of</strong> outdoor tennis <strong>and</strong> basketball needs.<br />

The <strong>Town</strong> should adopt a target <strong>of</strong> one skateboard park per 5,000 youth aged 10 to 19 when determining skateboarding needs.<br />

The <strong>Town</strong> should adopt a target <strong>of</strong> one waterplay facility per 5,000 children aged under 14 years when determining the outdoor aquatic<br />

needs for children.<br />

The <strong>Town</strong> should target the provision <strong>of</strong> playgrounds within a service radius <strong>of</strong> 500 metres <strong>of</strong> all built up residential areas, unobstructed by<br />

major barriers.<br />

The <strong>Town</strong> continue to work towards achieving the parkl<strong>and</strong> provision st<strong>and</strong>ard contained in its Official <strong>Plan</strong>. The <strong>Town</strong> should make every<br />

attempt to work towards the provision <strong>of</strong> 2.0 hectares per 1,000 population for active parkl<strong>and</strong>. More specifically, the <strong>Town</strong> should target a<br />

level <strong>of</strong> provision <strong>of</strong> 0.5 ha per 1,000 for Parkettes <strong>and</strong> Neighbourhood <strong>Parks</strong> (combined), 0.5 ha per 1,000 for Community <strong>Parks</strong>, <strong>and</strong> 1.0 ha<br />

per 1,000 for <strong>Town</strong>‐wide <strong>Parks</strong>.<br />

* Note: certain facilities covered in this <strong>Master</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> may not have a defined target level <strong>of</strong> service associated with them<br />

MONTEITH BROWN PLANNING CONSULTANTS in association with Tucker‐Reid & Associates & The JF Group<br />

April 2008<br />

Page 56


Implementation<br />

5.2.2 Facility‐Specific Implementation Strategies<br />

ID # Action <strong>Plan</strong> Rank<br />

Multi‐Use Community Centre Site (preferably at Sportsplex Park)<br />

(out <strong>of</strong> 46)<br />

Priority<br />

Suggested Timing<br />

Short‐Term Mid‐Term Long‐Term<br />

2<br />

Based upon facility assessments conducted as part <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Master</strong> <strong>Plan</strong>, one new<br />

multi‐use community centre will be required during the next five years,<br />

preferably to be located in north east <strong>Ajax</strong>.<br />

1 HIGH<br />

2011<br />

(Phase 1)<br />

2016<br />

(Phase 2)<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

10<br />

A twin pad arena is recommended for development as part <strong>of</strong> the second phase<br />

<strong>of</strong> construction for a new multi‐use community complex that would preferably be<br />

situated at Sportsplex Park.<br />

Provision <strong>of</strong> a third indoor pool facility is recommended for inclusion as part <strong>of</strong> a<br />

new multi‐use community centre, preferably as part <strong>of</strong> its first phase <strong>of</strong><br />

development.<br />

The <strong>Town</strong> should incorporate dedicated youth leisure spaces as part <strong>of</strong> the design<br />

for a new multi‐use community centre, preferably as part <strong>of</strong> its first phase <strong>of</strong><br />

development.<br />

A dedicated older adult space should be included as part <strong>of</strong> the design for a new<br />

multi‐use community centre, preferably as part <strong>of</strong> the facility’s second phase <strong>of</strong><br />

development.<br />

As part <strong>of</strong> a new multi‐use community centre, the <strong>Town</strong> should include an active<br />

living studio <strong>and</strong> an indoor walking track to encourage physical activity during all<br />

seasons <strong>and</strong> among all age groups.<br />

The provision <strong>of</strong> a full gymnasium is recommended for inclusion as part <strong>of</strong> the<br />

first phase <strong>of</strong> development at the proposed multi‐use community centre. This<br />

would assist in augmenting programming opportunities at school gyms which<br />

may not otherwise be available for certain users.<br />

When including meeting spaces at the new multi‐use community centre (<strong>and</strong>/or<br />

at any other new community facilities), consideration should be given to<br />

accommodating certain needs <strong>of</strong> the arts <strong>and</strong> culture sector through the design <strong>of</strong><br />

the facilities.<br />

Based upon the recommended target, growth in the youth population <strong>and</strong> usage<br />

at existing facilities, the provision <strong>of</strong> one new skateboard park is required to meet<br />

long‐term dem<strong>and</strong>s; it is preferred that this skatepark be constructed as part <strong>of</strong><br />

the Sportsplex Park expansion.<br />

6 HIGH 2016<br />

4 HIGH 2011<br />

2 HIGH 2011<br />

3 HIGH 2016<br />

14 HIGH 2011<br />

5 HIGH 2011<br />

13 HIGH Ongoing<br />

23 HIGH 2011<br />

MONTEITH BROWN PLANNING CONSULTANTS in association with Tucker‐Reid & Associates & The JF Group<br />

April 2008<br />

Page 57


Implementation<br />

ID # Action <strong>Plan</strong> Rank<br />

(out <strong>of</strong> 46)<br />

Priority<br />

Suggested Timing<br />

Short‐Term Mid‐Term Long‐Term<br />

11<br />

Prior to development <strong>of</strong> each phase <strong>of</strong> the recommended multi‐use community<br />

centre, the <strong>Town</strong> should conduct a feasibility, business plan <strong>and</strong> design study to<br />

verify that all the components recommended for the facility through this <strong>Master</strong><br />

<strong>Plan</strong> are justified given the community characteristics <strong>and</strong> level <strong>of</strong> dem<strong>and</strong><br />

present at that time.<br />

12 HIGH<br />

2009<br />

(Phase 1)<br />

2014<br />

(Phase 2)<br />

12<br />

In anticipation <strong>of</strong> l<strong>and</strong> acquisition challenges associated with the <strong>Town</strong>’s<br />

forthcoming projected build‐out, this multi‐use facility should be sited <strong>and</strong><br />

designed in a manner that allows future expansion should additional recreation<br />

or leisure components be required in the long‐term.<br />

21 HIGH 2011<br />

Indoor Aquatics<br />

13<br />

The <strong>Town</strong> should consider the feasibility <strong>of</strong> providing a therapeutic pool in <strong>Ajax</strong><br />

through a business planning process. In order to determine the most appropriate<br />

location for the therapeutic pool, this analysis should be conducted concurrently<br />

with the feasibility study for the multi‐use community centre (see Action <strong>Plan</strong> ID<br />

#11).<br />

10 HIGH 2009<br />

Multi‐Purpose Community & Program Spaces<br />

14<br />

15<br />

Include flexible community <strong>and</strong> program spaces as part <strong>of</strong> the design template for<br />

all appropriate community‐oriented facilities, including the new multi‐use<br />

community centre. These spaces should be designed to accommodate multiple<br />

purposes, to the greatest extent possible.<br />

In order to address service gaps pertaining to meeting spaces in <strong>Ajax</strong>’s northern<br />

<strong>and</strong>/or southeast quadrants, the <strong>Town</strong> should consider investing in the<br />

development <strong>of</strong> meeting spaces <strong>and</strong>/or gymnasiums at proposed community<br />

schools, <strong>and</strong>/or any other new school developments.<br />

Older Adult & Senior’s Space<br />

28 HIGH Ongoing<br />

29 MEDIUM 2009<br />

16<br />

The <strong>Town</strong> should continually evaluate opportunities to exp<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong>/or add<br />

dedicated older adult <strong>and</strong> seniors areas to existing community recreation <strong>and</strong><br />

leisure facilities. In doing so, the <strong>Town</strong> should consult with local seniors’ clubs in<br />

the design <strong>of</strong> exp<strong>and</strong>ed or new seniors‐oriented facilities in order to ensure that<br />

local needs are considered in a manner that encourages a high degree <strong>of</strong> use<br />

through principles <strong>of</strong> inclusion <strong>and</strong> accessibility.<br />

7 MEDIUM Ongoing<br />

MONTEITH BROWN PLANNING CONSULTANTS in association with Tucker‐Reid & Associates & The JF Group<br />

April 2008<br />

Page 58


Implementation<br />

ID # Action <strong>Plan</strong> Rank<br />

St. Andrew’s Community Centre<br />

17<br />

18<br />

St. Andrew’s Community Centre should be exp<strong>and</strong>ed (through linking the two<br />

separated buildings) to accommodate a wider range <strong>of</strong> older adult‐specific needs,<br />

particularly through the inclusion <strong>of</strong> active living space. This will create a<br />

centralized hub for older adult programming in <strong>Ajax</strong> <strong>and</strong> should incorporate<br />

spaces for a range <strong>of</strong> active <strong>and</strong> passive opportunities to be pursued. Exp<strong>and</strong>ed<br />

<strong>and</strong> revitalized space at St. Andrews will not only be <strong>of</strong> benefit to older adults<br />

using the facility but will also increase the capacity for community recreational<br />

programming, private rentals <strong>and</strong> support the uses <strong>of</strong> the current tenant, the<br />

<strong>Ajax</strong>/Pickering Navy League Branch. It is recommended that the <strong>Town</strong> undertake<br />

a full consultation approach with all existing users to ensure plans meet current<br />

<strong>and</strong> future anticipated need.<br />

The <strong>Town</strong> should include a small‐scale fitness facility at the St. Andrew’s<br />

Community Centre that is specifically for the use <strong>of</strong> the older adult population. At<br />

a minimum, this should include a studio space with wood‐sprung floors <strong>and</strong><br />

sufficiently high ceilings to accommodate a range <strong>of</strong> fitness programs.<br />

Preschool / Early Childhood Development Space<br />

19<br />

Fitness Space<br />

20<br />

The provision <strong>of</strong> preschool programming rooms at new leisure facilities is<br />

encouraged so that the inability to find suitable child supervision does not<br />

become a barrier to the participation <strong>of</strong> caregivers in municipal leisure programs,<br />

while also providing opportunities for early childhood development.<br />

The <strong>Town</strong> should evaluate new <strong>and</strong> existing outdoor community spaces for their<br />

ability to accommodate active living <strong>and</strong> wellness programming opportunities as<br />

a means to add value to open spaces through encouraging passive recreation.<br />

Arts & <strong>Culture</strong><br />

21<br />

The <strong>Town</strong> should continually work with the arts <strong>and</strong> cultural community to<br />

optimize the utilization <strong>of</strong> existing meeting/gathering spaces for their potential to<br />

accommodate specific needs <strong>of</strong> these groups (e.g. St. Francis de Sales – for the<br />

purposes <strong>of</strong> performing arts).<br />

(out <strong>of</strong> 46)<br />

Priority<br />

Suggested Timing<br />

Short‐Term Mid‐Term Long‐Term<br />

24 HIGH 2020<br />

25 HIGH 2020<br />

31 HIGH Ongoing<br />

19 MEDIUM Ongoing<br />

18 HIGH Ongoing<br />

MONTEITH BROWN PLANNING CONSULTANTS in association with Tucker‐Reid & Associates & The JF Group<br />

April 2008<br />

Page 59


Implementation<br />

ID # Action <strong>Plan</strong> Rank<br />

Pickering Village<br />

(out <strong>of</strong> 46)<br />

Priority<br />

Suggested Timing<br />

Short‐Term Mid‐Term Long‐Term<br />

22<br />

The Village Arena should be decommissioned <strong>and</strong> repurposed to another use<br />

once the new twin pad arena becomes operational (e.g. arts/cultural <strong>and</strong> multipurpose<br />

recreation space).<br />

38 HIGH 2016<br />

Greenways & Greenbelts<br />

23<br />

24<br />

25<br />

Future subdivisions should continue to be designed to accommodate trail<br />

networks, especially those that have the potential to connect to the major trail<br />

networks present in <strong>Ajax</strong>.<br />

The <strong>Plan</strong>ning & Development Services Department, in reviewing plans <strong>of</strong><br />

subdivision, should make every effort in acquiring adequate parking at suitable<br />

access points in the trail system.<br />

The <strong>Town</strong> should design trails to become multi‐seasonal facilities which can<br />

provide a range <strong>of</strong> opportunities in the summer <strong>and</strong> winter months. The types <strong>of</strong><br />

permitted uses should be evaluated on a trail‐by‐trail basis.<br />

11 HIGH Ongoing<br />

43 MEDIUM Ongoing<br />

8 MEDIUM Ongoing<br />

Soccer Fields<br />

26<br />

The <strong>Town</strong> should proceed with all field lighting <strong>and</strong> turf improvement projects<br />

identified in its Long Range Capital Forecast in order to improve field quality <strong>and</strong><br />

encourage bookings <strong>of</strong> existing fields as a means to achieve reasonable usage<br />

targets.<br />

44 MEDIUM<br />

Initiate all<br />

projects by<br />

2011<br />

27<br />

Construct a total <strong>of</strong> seven new unlit full size soccer field equivalents by 2021,<br />

proceeding with those already identified in the Long Term Capital Forecast; to the<br />

greatest extent possible, new fields should be clustered together to form multifield<br />

complexes, either at existing parks or at future park locations. It is<br />

recommended that, pending confirmation through a business planning exercise,<br />

at least one field be designed with an artificial turf surface to <strong>of</strong>fer extended<br />

playable hours.<br />

30 HIGH<br />

2010<br />

(1 field)<br />

2011<br />

(2 fields)<br />

2015<br />

(1 field)<br />

TBD<br />

(1 field)<br />

TBD<br />

(2 fields)<br />

28<br />

The <strong>Town</strong> should evaluate the possibility <strong>of</strong> converting surplus s<strong>of</strong>tball diamonds<br />

to soccer fields as a means to address the soccer field shortage.<br />

32 MEDIUM Ongoing<br />

MONTEITH BROWN PLANNING CONSULTANTS in association with Tucker‐Reid & Associates & The JF Group<br />

April 2008<br />

Page 60


Implementation<br />

ID # Action <strong>Plan</strong> Rank<br />

Multi‐Use Fields<br />

(out <strong>of</strong> 46)<br />

Priority<br />

Suggested Timing<br />

Short‐Term Mid‐Term Long‐Term<br />

29<br />

Pending confirmation through a business planning exercise, the <strong>Town</strong> should<br />

provide an artificial turf field (preferred for development at either <strong>Ajax</strong><br />

Community Centre or Sportsplex Park) for a variety <strong>of</strong> field sports, in a manner<br />

that is equitable to a range <strong>of</strong> users. Should substantial use be observed at this<br />

field, the <strong>Town</strong> should develop one additional field (natural or artificial turf) for<br />

similar uses.<br />

39 MEDIUM Between 2009 & 2016<br />

Ball Diamonds<br />

30<br />

31<br />

The <strong>Town</strong> should initiate field lighting <strong>and</strong> turf improvement projects at<br />

appropriate high‐use ball diamonds in order to continue its field improvement<br />

practices <strong>and</strong> encourage bookings <strong>of</strong> existing fields.<br />

The <strong>Town</strong> should undertake a study <strong>of</strong> its underutilized <strong>and</strong> lower quality<br />

diamonds in order to identify potential surplus diamonds which would be better<br />

suited to accommodate other community facility needs. This process should be<br />

conducted in concert with appropriate stakeholder groups <strong>and</strong> other<br />

neighbourhood representatives.<br />

45 MEDIUM Ongoing<br />

34 MEDIUM Ongoing<br />

Multi‐Use Courts<br />

32<br />

The <strong>Town</strong> should develop new court facilities utilizing a multi‐use design<br />

template, which allow multiple sports to be played on the surface. Future growth<br />

suggests that at least six new multi‐use courts are required by 2021.<br />

41 MEDIUM<br />

2011<br />

(2 courts)<br />

2012<br />

(2 courts)<br />

33<br />

Where <strong>and</strong> when required, the <strong>Town</strong> should upgrade existing courts to provide a<br />

safe <strong>and</strong> higher quality experience for users.<br />

Skateboard <strong>Parks</strong><br />

34<br />

The provision <strong>of</strong> introductory‐level skate zones is encouraged at the<br />

neighbourhood park level through the park development or renewal process to<br />

facilitate casual use <strong>of</strong> the park by those who want basic skate features.<br />

36 HIGH Ongoing<br />

37 MEDIUM Ongoing<br />

MONTEITH BROWN PLANNING CONSULTANTS in association with Tucker‐Reid & Associates & The JF Group<br />

April 2008<br />

Page 61


Implementation<br />

ID # Action <strong>Plan</strong> Rank<br />

Outdoor Aquatics<br />

(out <strong>of</strong> 46)<br />

Priority<br />

Suggested Timing<br />

Short‐Term Mid‐Term Long‐Term<br />

35<br />

The provision <strong>of</strong> three new waterplay areas is required to meet long‐term<br />

dem<strong>and</strong>s. It is recommended that one new splash pad be constructed in the<br />

eastern area <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Ajax</strong> waterfront <strong>and</strong> one splash pad be provided at Sportsplex<br />

Park, as these parks are anticipated to become major hubs for community‐wide<br />

recreation. The need <strong>and</strong> location for the third splash pad should be reconfirmed<br />

after the other proposed facilities become operational.<br />

16 HIGH<br />

2009<br />

(Waterfront)<br />

2011<br />

(Sportsplex<br />

Park)<br />

Waterfront Areas<br />

36<br />

37<br />

38<br />

39<br />

Playgrounds<br />

Proceed with the development <strong>of</strong> the Waterfront East Community Pavilion to<br />

provide an anchor point for the eastern end <strong>of</strong> waterfront. This facility should<br />

contain functional program space as well as amenities catered to the convenience<br />

<strong>and</strong> enjoyment <strong>of</strong> trail users <strong>and</strong> tourists to the waterfront.<br />

Continue to develop waterfront trails that showcase the exceptional aesthetic<br />

value <strong>of</strong> Lake Ontario, Duffins Bay <strong>and</strong>/or other creek systems contained within<br />

<strong>Ajax</strong>.<br />

Continue to enhance beach facilities as a means to draw residents to the<br />

waterfront; this will also require attention to water quality levels in Lake Ontario<br />

to ensure that they are optimal for swimming.<br />

The provision <strong>of</strong> two s<strong>and</strong> volleyball courts is recommended at Paradise Park (or<br />

other suitable location) to gauge interest in the sport. The appropriateness <strong>of</strong> this<br />

use should be confirmed through the recommended conceptual master plan for<br />

the park.<br />

33 HIGH 2009<br />

9 HIGH Ongoing<br />

26 HIGH Ongoing<br />

46 LOW 2010<br />

40<br />

In considering the needs <strong>of</strong> children with special needs <strong>and</strong> disabilities, the <strong>Town</strong><br />

should construct fully accessible, barrier‐free playgrounds at the <strong>Ajax</strong> Waterfront<br />

<strong>and</strong> at Sportsplex Park. Furthermore, the <strong>Town</strong> should set a long‐term goal <strong>of</strong><br />

continuing to provide several barrier‐free playgrounds dispersed across <strong>Ajax</strong>.<br />

17 HIGH<br />

2010<br />

(Waterfront)<br />

2011<br />

(Sportsplex<br />

Park)<br />

41<br />

42<br />

The <strong>Town</strong> should target the provision <strong>of</strong> playgrounds within a service radius <strong>of</strong><br />

500 metres <strong>of</strong> all built up residential areas, unobstructed by major barriers.<br />

The <strong>Town</strong> should continue to follow CSA guidelines for playground construction<br />

<strong>and</strong> ensure that all playgrounds are regularly inspected <strong>and</strong> maintained by<br />

trained staff.<br />

15 HIGH Ongoing<br />

27 HIGH Ongoing<br />

MONTEITH BROWN PLANNING CONSULTANTS in association with Tucker‐Reid & Associates & The JF Group<br />

April 2008<br />

Page 62


Implementation<br />

ID # Action <strong>Plan</strong> Rank<br />

Parkl<strong>and</strong><br />

43<br />

44<br />

45<br />

46<br />

47<br />

To meet long‐term dem<strong>and</strong> for parkl<strong>and</strong> as recommended through the revised<br />

provision st<strong>and</strong>ards in this <strong>Master</strong> <strong>Plan</strong>, the <strong>Town</strong> will have to acquire 2 hectares<br />

<strong>of</strong> active parkl<strong>and</strong> by 2021, over <strong>and</strong> above current development plans.<br />

Public washroom facilities (through a combination <strong>of</strong> permanent <strong>and</strong> portable<br />

facilities) should continue to be provided at heavily utilized parks <strong>and</strong> key<br />

trailheads along the greenway systems.<br />

The <strong>Town</strong> should proceed with the construction <strong>of</strong> a pavilion‐type facility at<br />

Greenwood Park that contains winterized washrooms, <strong>of</strong>fice space <strong>and</strong> shelter<br />

from the rain in order to enhance the quality <strong>of</strong> programs <strong>of</strong>fered at this location.<br />

Should usage <strong>of</strong> existing picnic pavilions be at capacity for summer weekends, the<br />

<strong>Town</strong> should construct an additional pavilion at an appropriate location (e.g.<br />

natural parks such as those along the waterfront <strong>and</strong> in greenbelt systems,<br />

Millers Creek Park, Sportsplex Park, St. Andrew’s Park, etc.).<br />

Ensure that adequate signage exists at all municipal parks, trailheads (with<br />

appropriate routing information) <strong>and</strong> recreation <strong>and</strong> cultural facilities. These<br />

signs should be restored or replaced when they deteriorate.<br />

Continue to exp<strong>and</strong> upon the existing greenbelt systems as a means to develop<br />

corridors that serve ecological <strong>and</strong> passive recreational purposes.<br />

(out <strong>of</strong> 46)<br />

Priority<br />

Suggested Timing<br />

Short‐Term Mid‐Term Long‐Term<br />

22 HIGH Ongoing (through to 2021)<br />

40 MEDIUM Ongoing<br />

35 HIGH<br />

2008<br />

(Greenwood<br />

Park)<br />

42 MEDIUM Ongoing<br />

20 HIGH Ongoing<br />

MONTEITH BROWN PLANNING CONSULTANTS in association with Tucker‐Reid & Associates & The JF Group<br />

April 2008<br />

Page 63


Implementation<br />

5.2.3 Programming & Policy‐Specific Implementation Strategies<br />

ID # Action <strong>Plan</strong> Rank<br />

Multi‐Use Community Centre Site (preferably at Sportsplex Park)<br />

48<br />

New facilities, where feasible, should be designed according to LEED or<br />

equivalent st<strong>and</strong>ards <strong>and</strong> incorporate “green” technologies to showcase the<br />

<strong>Town</strong>’s leadership role in energy efficiency <strong>and</strong> environmental stewardship.<br />

Ice Pads / Arenas<br />

49<br />

The <strong>Recreation</strong> Services Department should collect registration data from local<br />

ice sport organizations on an annual basis <strong>and</strong> re‐apply the service level target<br />

prior to the design <strong>and</strong> construction <strong>of</strong> new arena facilities in order to ensure<br />

sufficient dem<strong>and</strong> exists.<br />

Multi‐Purpose Community & Program Spaces<br />

50<br />

The <strong>Town</strong> should continue to explore partnership opportunities with the local<br />

school boards as a means to augment its supply <strong>of</strong> publicly accessible meeting<br />

spaces.<br />

Older Adult & Senior’s Space<br />

51<br />

A focus should continue to be placed upon enhancing the service delivery model<br />

for older adults through the development <strong>of</strong> innovative, inclusive <strong>and</strong> accessible<br />

programs focusing on wellness <strong>and</strong> active living.<br />

Child & Youth Leisure Space<br />

52<br />

53<br />

The <strong>Town</strong> should endeavour to facilitate a youth‐friendly atmosphere at all<br />

municipal youth facilities by continuing to provide appropriate training for<br />

municipal staff <strong>and</strong> involving youth in the decision‐making processes throughout<br />

the design phase <strong>and</strong> facility operation.<br />

The <strong>Town</strong> should conduct its Youth Survey (or similar consultation tool) every<br />

five years to ensure that it is well positioned to respond to youth‐specific needs<br />

<strong>and</strong> concerns.<br />

(out <strong>of</strong> 47)<br />

Priority<br />

Suggested Timing<br />

Short‐Term Mid‐Term Long‐Term<br />

21 HIGH Ongoing<br />

36 HIGH Ongoing<br />

2 HIGH Ongoing<br />

12 HIGH Ongoing<br />

13 HIGH Ongoing<br />

14 HIGH 2009 2014 2019<br />

MONTEITH BROWN PLANNING CONSULTANTS in association with Tucker‐Reid & Associates & The JF Group<br />

April 2008<br />

Page 64


Implementation<br />

ID # Action <strong>Plan</strong> Rank<br />

Fitness Space<br />

54<br />

Gymnasium<br />

55<br />

Arts & <strong>Culture</strong><br />

56<br />

57<br />

58<br />

The <strong>Town</strong> should continue to develop innovative <strong>and</strong> interesting programs that<br />

will respond to the needs <strong>of</strong> its growing population, particularly the older adult<br />

market. The <strong>Town</strong> should also consider ways to engage residents <strong>of</strong> different<br />

ethnic backgrounds in order to encourage physical activities that appeal to a<br />

wide range <strong>of</strong> residents.<br />

The <strong>Town</strong> should make every effort to maintain community access to school<br />

gyms to serve any neighbourhood‐level dem<strong>and</strong>s.<br />

The development <strong>of</strong> a Public Art Policy is recommended to encourage the<br />

provision <strong>and</strong> promotion <strong>of</strong> public art in <strong>Ajax</strong>. Policies governing public art<br />

should also be included in the Official <strong>Plan</strong> at the time <strong>of</strong> its next revision to<br />

provide municipal direction in this matter.<br />

The <strong>Town</strong> should continue to implement the strategic directions contained in<br />

the Integrated Community Arts <strong>and</strong> Cultural <strong>Plan</strong> in order to facilitate a thriving<br />

environment for <strong>Ajax</strong>’s creative sector.<br />

The creation <strong>of</strong> a funding strategy to support the development <strong>of</strong> arts <strong>and</strong><br />

cultural programs would be <strong>of</strong> great benefit in developing <strong>and</strong> exp<strong>and</strong>ing the<br />

creative infrastructure <strong>of</strong> <strong>Ajax</strong>.<br />

Pickering Village<br />

59<br />

Heritage Assets<br />

60<br />

The findings <strong>of</strong> the Pickering Village Urban Design & Heritage Study should<br />

support decisions surrounding the Village Central Area <strong>and</strong> possibly focus upon<br />

developing the area as a primary node for creative <strong>and</strong> cultural activity through<br />

ongoing investment <strong>and</strong> policy development.<br />

The <strong>Recreation</strong> Services, <strong>Plan</strong>ning & Development Services, <strong>and</strong> Operations &<br />

Environmental Services departments should provide input to the Heritage<br />

Advisory Committee in order to assist in protecting properties with historically<br />

significant architecture <strong>and</strong> urban design features.<br />

(out <strong>of</strong> 47)<br />

Priority<br />

Suggested Timing<br />

Short‐Term Mid‐Term Long‐Term<br />

5 HIGH Ongoing<br />

27 HIGH Ongoing<br />

38 MEDIUM 2009<br />

31 HIGH Ongoing<br />

23 MEDIUM 2009<br />

40 HIGH Ongoing<br />

41 MEDIUM 2009<br />

MONTEITH BROWN PLANNING CONSULTANTS in association with Tucker‐Reid & Associates & The JF Group<br />

April 2008<br />

Page 65


Implementation<br />

ID # Action <strong>Plan</strong> Rank<br />

Trails, Greenways & Greenbelts<br />

61<br />

Soccer Fields<br />

62<br />

63<br />

Multi‐Use Fields<br />

64<br />

Ball Diamonds<br />

65<br />

The <strong>Town</strong> should continue to implement the key recommendations <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Bicycle <strong>and</strong> Leisure Trail System <strong>Plan</strong>. As a key corporate document, this <strong>Plan</strong><br />

should be revisited in 2011, approximately ten years from its date <strong>of</strong> adoption,<br />

to ensure relevancy to future circumstances <strong>and</strong> monitor progress to date.<br />

The <strong>Town</strong> should continue to work with soccer organizations in order to<br />

evaluate field usage through the Facility Usage Report. The <strong>Town</strong> should collect<br />

registration data from all permitted organizations on an annual basis in order to<br />

apply the recommended provision target <strong>of</strong> one soccer field per 90 players as a<br />

means to evaluate dem<strong>and</strong> for fields in conjunction with facility usage data.<br />

Through acceptable agreements with local school boards, the <strong>Town</strong> should<br />

encourage soccer field usage at school campuses to maximize supply <strong>and</strong> space<br />

requirements.<br />

The <strong>Town</strong> should continue to work with the local school boards, to the greatest<br />

extent possible, to ensure that new <strong>and</strong> existing school fields – in concert with<br />

municipal fields – are able to accommodate football, lacrosse <strong>and</strong> other field<br />

sports.<br />

In order to accurately assess market dem<strong>and</strong> for ball in <strong>Ajax</strong>, the <strong>Town</strong> should<br />

continue to work with hardball <strong>and</strong> s<strong>of</strong>tball organizations in order to evaluate<br />

field usage through the Facility Usage Report. The <strong>Town</strong> should collect<br />

registration data from all permitted organizations on an annual basis in order to<br />

apply the recommended provision target <strong>of</strong> one ball diamond per 100 players as<br />

a means to evaluate dem<strong>and</strong> for fields in conjunction with facility usage data.<br />

Skateboard <strong>Parks</strong><br />

66<br />

The <strong>Town</strong> should regularly consult with the local skateboarding community <strong>and</strong><br />

other youth in the design <strong>and</strong> redesign <strong>of</strong> new <strong>and</strong> existing skateboard parks to<br />

ensure that skateboarding facilities are cost‐effective <strong>and</strong> responsive to current<br />

design trends <strong>and</strong> user preferences.<br />

(out <strong>of</strong> 47)<br />

Priority<br />

24 HIGH<br />

Suggested Timing<br />

Short‐Term Mid‐Term Long‐Term<br />

2011<br />

(Update)<br />

33 HIGH Ongoing<br />

16 HIGH Ongoing<br />

15 MEDIUM Ongoing<br />

32 HIGH Ongoing<br />

6 HIGH Ongoing<br />

MONTEITH BROWN PLANNING CONSULTANTS in association with Tucker‐Reid & Associates & The JF Group<br />

April 2008<br />

Page 66


Implementation<br />

ID # Action <strong>Plan</strong> Rank<br />

Waterfront Areas<br />

67<br />

Acquisition <strong>of</strong> l<strong>and</strong> along waterways is encouraged, particularly along the northsouth<br />

creeks <strong>and</strong> associated tributaries present in <strong>Ajax</strong>. Doing so will increase<br />

the supply <strong>of</strong> passive open spaces <strong>and</strong> ensure protection <strong>of</strong> environmentally<br />

significant riparian areas.<br />

Off‐Leash Dog <strong>Parks</strong><br />

68<br />

Parkl<strong>and</strong><br />

69<br />

70<br />

71<br />

72<br />

73<br />

74<br />

The <strong>Town</strong> should engage community groups interested in the establishment,<br />

general maintenance <strong>and</strong> ongoing operation when considering additional <strong>of</strong>fleash<br />

dog parks; this includes the establishment <strong>of</strong> an appropriate cost‐sharing<br />

agreement. Priority for any future <strong>of</strong>f‐leash parks should be given to sites in the<br />

eastern areas <strong>of</strong> <strong>Ajax</strong>.<br />

The <strong>Town</strong> continue to work towards achieving the parkl<strong>and</strong> provision st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />

contained in its Official <strong>Plan</strong>.<br />

The <strong>Town</strong> should make every attempt to work towards the provision <strong>of</strong> 2.0<br />

hectares per 1,000 population for active parkl<strong>and</strong>. More specifically, the <strong>Town</strong><br />

should target a level <strong>of</strong> provision <strong>of</strong> 0.5 ha per 1,000 for Parkettes <strong>and</strong><br />

Neighbourhood <strong>Parks</strong> (combined), 0.5 ha per 1,000 for Community <strong>Parks</strong>, <strong>and</strong><br />

1.0 ha per 1,000 for <strong>Town</strong>‐wide <strong>Parks</strong>.<br />

The <strong>Town</strong> should incorporate a definition <strong>of</strong> Open Space L<strong>and</strong>s into Section<br />

2.2.5a <strong>of</strong> the Official <strong>Plan</strong>. This definition should encompass all l<strong>and</strong>s that may<br />

contribute to the passive leisure opportunities in the open space system,<br />

excluding woodlots, valley l<strong>and</strong>s <strong>and</strong> other hazard l<strong>and</strong>s.<br />

Over <strong>and</strong> above developments currently planned, the <strong>Town</strong> should focus its<br />

efforts on augmenting supplies <strong>of</strong> Community <strong>and</strong> Open Space <strong>Parks</strong>.<br />

Where shortfalls may occur in parkl<strong>and</strong> acquisition through the development<br />

process, the <strong>Town</strong> should employ a range <strong>of</strong> alternative parkl<strong>and</strong> acquisition<br />

mechanisms to obtain the necessary amount <strong>of</strong> acreage.<br />

In order to develop effective l<strong>and</strong> acquisition strategies, there will be a need for<br />

continual communication <strong>and</strong> collaboration between <strong>Recreation</strong> Services,<br />

<strong>Plan</strong>ning & Development Services, Operations & Environmental Services, <strong>and</strong><br />

Economic Development Services.<br />

(out <strong>of</strong> 47)<br />

Priority<br />

Suggested Timing<br />

Short‐Term Mid‐Term Long‐Term<br />

20 HIGH Ongoing<br />

28 MEDIUM Ongoing<br />

39 HIGH Ongoing<br />

25 MEDIUM Ongoing<br />

46 MEDIUM 2008<br />

42 MEDIUM Ongoing<br />

43 HIGH Ongoing<br />

37 HIGH Ongoing<br />

MONTEITH BROWN PLANNING CONSULTANTS in association with Tucker‐Reid & Associates & The JF Group<br />

April 2008<br />

Page 67


Implementation<br />

ID # Action <strong>Plan</strong> Rank<br />

75<br />

76<br />

77<br />

78<br />

79<br />

80<br />

81<br />

Partnerships<br />

82<br />

Provisions to incorporate spaces <strong>and</strong> amenities encouraging physical activity,<br />

wellness <strong>and</strong> informal use opportunities should be paramount considerations in<br />

the design <strong>of</strong> parks in order to encourage use <strong>and</strong> facilitate activity levels.<br />

The <strong>Town</strong> should continue to design parks that incorporate natural, indigenous<br />

vegetation features in order to foster an appreciation for such areas <strong>and</strong><br />

maintain crucial ecological functions.<br />

To ensure that safety concerns do not become a barrier to park usage, the <strong>Town</strong><br />

should continue to incorporate CPTED principles in park design <strong>and</strong> facilitate<br />

ambassador programs in consultation with the local police department to<br />

encourage civic participation in keeping local parks free <strong>of</strong> undesirable<br />

behaviours.<br />

Continue to implement the recommendations <strong>of</strong> the Greenwood Conservation<br />

Area Management <strong>Plan</strong>.<br />

Upon implementation <strong>of</strong> actions contained in the Restoration <strong>and</strong> Naturalization<br />

<strong>Plan</strong> (expected by 2010), the <strong>Town</strong> should consider the continuation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

implementation program beyond 2010 through the update <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Plan</strong>.<br />

Continually develop innovative <strong>and</strong> engaging initiatives, in partnership with local<br />

conservation authorities <strong>and</strong> other experts in environmental management, that<br />

encourage environmental stewardship <strong>and</strong> the role <strong>of</strong> individuals in maintaining<br />

<strong>and</strong> enhancing ecological systems in <strong>Ajax</strong>.<br />

To meet the long term dem<strong>and</strong> for passive parkl<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> nature trails, the <strong>Town</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>Ajax</strong> should focus its efforts on the procurement <strong>of</strong> environmentally<br />

significant spaces, especially as it relates to trail connectivity.<br />

The <strong>Town</strong> should be open to considering partnership opportunities for<br />

construction <strong>and</strong> operation <strong>of</strong> the following facilities:<br />

• Arenas;<br />

• Training Club;<br />

• Parkl<strong>and</strong>;<br />

• Fitness Centre;<br />

• Youth Space;<br />

• Soccer;<br />

• Multi‐Use Centre; <strong>and</strong><br />

• Indoor Aquatics.<br />

(out <strong>of</strong> 47)<br />

Priority<br />

Suggested Timing<br />

Short‐Term Mid‐Term Long‐Term<br />

26 HIGH Ongoing<br />

17 HIGH Ongoing<br />

9 HIGH Ongoing<br />

30 HIGH Ongoing<br />

45 MEDIUM 2009<br />

18 MEDIUM Ongoing<br />

44 HIGH Ongoing<br />

7 MEDIUM Ongoing<br />

MONTEITH BROWN PLANNING CONSULTANTS in association with Tucker‐Reid & Associates & The JF Group<br />

April 2008<br />

Page 68


Implementation<br />

ID # Action <strong>Plan</strong> Rank<br />

83<br />

84<br />

85<br />

86<br />

87<br />

88<br />

89<br />

90<br />

91<br />

Where possible, the <strong>Town</strong> should seek interested partners who are qualified in<br />

delivering programs out <strong>of</strong> indoor aquatic centres, training clubs, gymnasiums<br />

<strong>and</strong> any other operational component deemed appropriate by the <strong>Town</strong> in<br />

order to evaluate whether efficiencies can be attained in capital <strong>and</strong> operational<br />

investment scenarios.<br />

The <strong>Recreation</strong> Services Department prioritize the partnership framework plan<br />

to serve in enhancing service <strong>and</strong> program provision through<br />

partnership/stakeholders. Further preliminary discussions take place with<br />

representatives from the various <strong>and</strong> recommended partner/stakeholder<br />

groups.<br />

That all staff serving partner <strong>and</strong> stakeholder groups meet to discuss approaches<br />

that may lessen the burden on the partners <strong>and</strong> stakeholders <strong>and</strong> provide “one<br />

stop shopping”.<br />

The <strong>Recreation</strong> Services Department review the staff <strong>and</strong> other resources that<br />

are dedicated to developing <strong>and</strong> nurturing relationships versus the resources<br />

utilized to develop <strong>and</strong> deliver programs <strong>and</strong> services directly. The purpose <strong>of</strong><br />

the review is to align resources equitably <strong>and</strong> or determine the need for<br />

additional resources to develop <strong>and</strong> strengthen partnerships.<br />

The <strong>Recreation</strong> Services Department determine the skill sets <strong>and</strong> competencies<br />

needed to develop <strong>and</strong> nurture partnerships <strong>and</strong> seek training <strong>and</strong> develop<br />

where it may be required.<br />

The <strong>Recreation</strong> Services Department proactively seek out partners to alleviate<br />

the capital <strong>and</strong> operating burden that may be realized through the facility<br />

developments <strong>and</strong> program enhancements recommended through the <strong>Master</strong><br />

<strong>Plan</strong>.<br />

The Department list all stakeholder <strong>and</strong> partner groups in the <strong>Recreation</strong> Guide<br />

to promote the full range <strong>of</strong> opportunities <strong>and</strong> choice.<br />

Future potential partnership arrangements consider the decision making<br />

protocol suggested in this report <strong>and</strong> further that all future service agreements<br />

be aligned with the priorities outlined in the strategic plan document.<br />

That the impact <strong>and</strong> cost avoidance <strong>and</strong>/or additional revenues realized as a<br />

result <strong>of</strong> supporting partners <strong>and</strong> community groups be reported annually to<br />

Council <strong>and</strong> the community.<br />

(out <strong>of</strong> 47)<br />

Priority<br />

Suggested Timing<br />

Short‐Term Mid‐Term Long‐Term<br />

8 MEDIUM Ongoing<br />

1 MEDIUM Ongoing<br />

10 MEDIUM Ongoing<br />

34 MEDIUM Ongoing<br />

35 MEDIUM Ongoing<br />

11 MEDIUM Ongoing<br />

29 MEDIUM Ongoing<br />

22 MEDIUM Ongoing<br />

47 MEDIUM Ongoing<br />

MONTEITH BROWN PLANNING CONSULTANTS in association with Tucker‐Reid & Associates & The JF Group<br />

April 2008<br />

Page 69


Implementation<br />

ID # Action <strong>Plan</strong> Rank<br />

Other Service Delivery<br />

92<br />

93<br />

94<br />

The <strong>Town</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Ajax</strong> should respond to requests for facilities presently not part <strong>of</strong><br />

the core m<strong>and</strong>ate on a case‐by‐case basis by evaluating the municipality’s role in<br />

providing the service in relation to quantified market dem<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> costeffectiveness<br />

<strong>of</strong> such services, while also identifying potential strategies to<br />

address long‐term need for such requests should a sufficient level <strong>of</strong> dem<strong>and</strong> be<br />

expressed.<br />

As per the Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act, the <strong>Town</strong> should<br />

continue to evaluate existing indoor <strong>and</strong> outdoor community spaces for their<br />

ability to meet the needs <strong>of</strong> residents with special needs <strong>and</strong> disabilities.<br />

A five year operational fiscal plan is required to fully address the human<br />

resource <strong>and</strong> material impacts <strong>of</strong> implementing the <strong>Master</strong> <strong>Plan</strong>’s actions in a<br />

manner which also complements capital projections as they relate to staffing<br />

levels.<br />

(out <strong>of</strong> 47)<br />

Priority<br />

Suggested Timing<br />

Short‐Term Mid‐Term Long‐Term<br />

19 MEDIUM Ongoing<br />

3 HIGH Ongoing<br />

4 HIGH 2009<br />

MONTEITH BROWN PLANNING CONSULTANTS in association with Tucker‐Reid & Associates & The JF Group<br />

April 2008<br />

Page 70


Implementation<br />

5.2.4 Actions Requiring Future Study<br />

ID # Action <strong>Plan</strong> Rank<br />

Youth Space<br />

95<br />

Fitness<br />

96<br />

Indoor Turf<br />

97<br />

Arts & <strong>Culture</strong><br />

98<br />

The <strong>Town</strong> should prepare a feasibility study <strong>and</strong> business plan to determine<br />

whether or not municipal investment is warranted in a st<strong>and</strong>‐alone youth<br />

facility, if an appropriate site is secured. In particular, the feasibility study<br />

should examine whether or not the st<strong>and</strong>‐alone facility would duplicate existing<br />

facilities <strong>and</strong> services <strong>of</strong>fered at existing municipal <strong>and</strong> community‐based<br />

venues.<br />

The <strong>Town</strong> should prepare a business plan to determine the feasibility <strong>of</strong><br />

including a training club as part <strong>of</strong> a new multi‐use community centre.<br />

The <strong>Town</strong> should undertake a business planning <strong>and</strong> feasibility study prior to the<br />

design <strong>of</strong> the new multi‐use community centre to determine whether municipal<br />

investment in indoor turf at the new facility is justifiable from a dem<strong>and</strong>,<br />

financing <strong>and</strong> operating perspective. Site selection criteria should consider<br />

Sportsplex Park (<strong>and</strong> any other appropriate sites) as possible venues for<br />

development.<br />

In conjunction with the <strong>Ajax</strong> Public Library, the <strong>Town</strong> should discuss the<br />

potential <strong>of</strong> including a new library branch within the proposed multi‐use<br />

community centre, likely necessitating the <strong>Town</strong> to undertake a library needs<br />

assessment <strong>and</strong> feasibility study.<br />

Pickering Village<br />

99<br />

The <strong>Town</strong> should employ a focused <strong>and</strong> phased strategy in developing cultural<br />

capacity in <strong>Ajax</strong> prior to investing in larger scale facility developments. In<br />

support <strong>of</strong> this effort, the <strong>Town</strong> should evaluate the feasibility <strong>of</strong> retr<strong>of</strong>itting the<br />

former St. Francis de Sales Church into a venue capable <strong>of</strong> hosting communitylevel<br />

programming including arts <strong>and</strong> theatrical productions as churches are<br />

ideally suited for such uses.<br />

(out <strong>of</strong> 10)<br />

Priority<br />

5 MEDIUM 2009<br />

3 HIGH 2009<br />

1 HIGH 2009<br />

6 MEDIUM 2009<br />

2 HIGH 2009<br />

Timing<br />

Short‐Term Mid‐Term Long‐Term<br />

MONTEITH BROWN PLANNING CONSULTANTS in association with Tucker‐Reid & Associates & The JF Group<br />

April 2008<br />

Page 71


Implementation<br />

ID # Action <strong>Plan</strong> Rank<br />

100<br />

Upon completion <strong>of</strong> the proposed multi‐use community centre <strong>and</strong> its<br />

associated twin‐pad arena, the <strong>Town</strong> should evaluate the feasibility <strong>of</strong><br />

repurposing the Village Arena & Community Centre site to become a multipurpose/multi‐media<br />

recreation centre to serve as the primary hub for cultural<br />

activity in the Pickering Village. It is envisioned that the area itself become a<br />

campus for creative activity by incorporating indoor <strong>and</strong> outdoor facilities that<br />

are responsive to the creative class, residents <strong>and</strong> commercial enterprise.<br />

Memorial Outdoor Pool<br />

101<br />

Paradise Park<br />

102<br />

The <strong>Town</strong> should evaluate its strategy for Memorial Pool by undertaking a<br />

consultation process with the public <strong>and</strong> stakeholder groups in order to<br />

determine the level <strong>of</strong> investment <strong>and</strong> amenities required for the outdoor pool.<br />

The <strong>Town</strong> should prepare a concept/master plan for redevelopment <strong>and</strong> future<br />

uses at Paradise Park as a means to increase its focus as a waterfront hub for<br />

active <strong>and</strong> passive opportunities. This plan should evaluate the feasibility <strong>of</strong><br />

closing a part <strong>of</strong> Lakeview Boulevard in order to increase the size <strong>of</strong> the park <strong>and</strong><br />

allow a greater range <strong>of</strong> uses to take place. It is also preferable that this plan (or<br />

a concurrent process) find ways to integrate north‐south greenways with the<br />

Waterfront Trail <strong>and</strong> other recreation <strong>and</strong> cultural assets in support <strong>of</strong><br />

establishing a comprehensive system <strong>of</strong> trails <strong>and</strong> pathways throughout <strong>Ajax</strong>.<br />

Outdoor Ice Skating Surfaces<br />

103<br />

Heritage Assets<br />

104<br />

The <strong>Town</strong> should explore the provision <strong>of</strong> artificial ice surfaces at appropriate<br />

multi‐use court sites <strong>and</strong> strategic park locations. As part <strong>of</strong> this analysis, the<br />

<strong>Town</strong> should undertake a detailed assessment <strong>of</strong> the costs involved with<br />

constructing a skating path with artificial ice system at a future Community or<br />

<strong>Town</strong>‐wide Park. Should the benefits <strong>and</strong> usage be deemed to outweigh the<br />

costs, additional outdoor artificial ice surfaces should be explored at future<br />

locations.<br />

The <strong>Town</strong> should develop an internal agreement as to how to strategically<br />

deliver the heritage portfolio, including roles <strong>and</strong> responsibilities <strong>of</strong> each<br />

department.<br />

(out <strong>of</strong> 10)<br />

Priority<br />

Timing<br />

Short‐Term Mid‐Term Long‐Term<br />

4 HIGH 2016<br />

8 MEDIUM 2012<br />

7 MEDIUM 2012<br />

9 MEDIUM<br />

10 LOW 2009<br />

2015<br />

(skating<br />

path<br />

feasibility<br />

study)<br />

MONTEITH BROWN PLANNING CONSULTANTS in association with Tucker‐Reid & Associates & The JF Group<br />

April 2008<br />

Page 72


Implementation<br />

5.3 Capital Costing & Phasing <strong>of</strong> Selected Actions<br />

Please note that costs are identified in 2007 dollars <strong>and</strong> have been<br />

derived from the Consultant’s internal database. These figures<br />

include costs associated with construction, contingencies, design<br />

fees, common spaces, furnishings <strong>and</strong> equipment, <strong>and</strong> site<br />

development, all <strong>of</strong> which are highly variable at this early point in<br />

the process. The figures do not include the cost <strong>of</strong> l<strong>and</strong><br />

acquisition or escalation <strong>of</strong> construction costs.<br />

Multi‐Use Community Centre<br />

The following phasing strategy is recommended for the<br />

development <strong>of</strong> a new multi‐use community centre. After Phase<br />

1 has been completed, the <strong>Town</strong> will be required to undertake a<br />

feasibility study <strong>and</strong> business plan for Phase 2 components prior<br />

to exp<strong>and</strong>ing the new facility.<br />

Table 4a: Multi‐Use Community Centre – Proposed Phasing <strong>Plan</strong><br />

Facility Components<br />

Timing<br />

First Phase <strong>of</strong> Development<br />

• Indoor Aquatics Centre<br />

• Banquet Hall<br />

• Full Gymnasium<br />

• Youth Leisure Space<br />

• Activity / Fitness Studio<br />

• Community & Program Space<br />

• Office, Administration & General Storage Space<br />

• Tenant Space<br />

• Outdoor Facilities (playground, skateboard<br />

park, splash pad, multi‐use courts)<br />

Optional components – Partnership‐driven<br />

• Child Care Centre<br />

• Training Club<br />

• Indoor Turf Centre<br />

• <strong>Ajax</strong> Public Library Branch<br />

Could be open as early as Fall 2011, although this<br />

may be somewhat aggressive.<br />

Second Phase <strong>of</strong> Development<br />

• Twin Pad Arena<br />

• Indoor Walking Track (depending on location<br />

within the facility design)<br />

• Older Adult Space<br />

• Tenant Space<br />

• Outdoor Facilities (outdoor skating path)<br />

• Other components identified over time (secure<br />

sufficient l<strong>and</strong> for expansion options)<br />

Timing dependent upon decision regarding the<br />

continued maintenance / disposal <strong>of</strong> Village<br />

Arena – possibly in the 2016‐2021 timeframe<br />

MONTEITH BROWN PLANNING CONSULTANTS in association with Tucker‐Reid & Associates & The JF Group<br />

April 2008<br />

Page 73


Implementation<br />

Table 4b: Multi‐Use Community Centre – Phase 1 Capital Costs<br />

Phase 1<br />

Concept & Site <strong>Plan</strong>, Feasibility<br />

Studies & Business <strong>Plan</strong>s<br />

Cost per<br />

Sq. Ft.<br />

Facility Size<br />

(Sq. Ft.)<br />

Total Cost<br />

Proposed<br />

Timing<br />

n/a n/a $150,000 2009<br />

Indoor Aquatics $260 19,000 $4,940,000 2011<br />

Youth Leisure Space $260 3,500 $910,000 2011<br />

Multi‐use Program Space $260 9,500 $2,470,000 2011<br />

Preschool Space $260 2,500 $650,000 2011<br />

Full Gymnasium $260 10,000 $2,600,000 2011<br />

Active Living Studio Space $260 6,000 $1,560,000 2011<br />

Office & Administration $260 5,500 $1,430,000 2011<br />

General Storage $260 5,000 $1,300,000 2011<br />

Tenant Space $260 1,500 $390,000 2011<br />

Total Facility Cost (Phase 1) 62,500 $16,400,000<br />

Phase 2<br />

Concept <strong>Plan</strong>, Feasibility Studies &<br />

Business <strong>Plan</strong>s<br />

Twin Pad Arena (includes 1 indoor<br />

walking track)<br />

n/a n/a $100,000 2014<br />

$260 75,000 $19,500,000 2016<br />

Older Adult Space $260 1,500 $390,000 2016<br />

Tenant Space $260 1,000 $260,000 2016<br />

Total Facility Cost (Phase 2) 77,500 $20,250,000<br />

* Please note that costs identified in this Table include those associated with construction, contingencies, design<br />

fees, common spaces, furnishings <strong>and</strong> equipment, <strong>and</strong> site development. The figures do not include the cost <strong>of</strong><br />

l<strong>and</strong> acquisition (if applicable) or escalation <strong>of</strong> future construction costs.<br />

MONTEITH BROWN PLANNING CONSULTANTS in association with Tucker‐Reid & Associates & The JF Group<br />

April 2008<br />

Page 74


Implementation<br />

Table 4c: Multi‐Use Community Centre – Outdoor Facility Costs<br />

Outdoor Facilities Cost per Unit Number <strong>of</strong><br />

Phase 1<br />

Units<br />

Total Cost<br />

Proposed<br />

Timing<br />

Multi‐Use Courts $100,000 2 $200,000 2011<br />

Skateboard Park $250,000 1 $250,000 2011<br />

Splash Pad $250,000 1 $250,000 2011<br />

Barrier‐Free Playground $350,000 1 $350,000 2011<br />

Total Outdoor Facility Cost (Phase 1) $1,050,000*<br />

Phase 2<br />

Outdoor Skating Path (estimate) $1,000,000 1 $1,000,000 2016<br />

Total Outdoor Facility Cost (Phase 2) $1,000,000*<br />

* Please note that costs identified are replicated in the following pages <strong>and</strong> should not be counted when adding cost totals between Tables.<br />

Indoor & Outdoor Facilities<br />

Table 5a: Indoor Facilities – Proposed Phasing <strong>Plan</strong><br />

Proposed Location Cost Proposed<br />

Timing<br />

Sportsplex Park Multi‐Use Facility (from Table 4b)<br />

Phase 1 $16,400,000 2011<br />

Phase 2 $20,250,000 2016<br />

St. Andrew’s Community Centre<br />

Senior’s Space (expansion) <strong>and</strong> Fitness Space tbd through further study 2020<br />

Pickering Village<br />

Village Community Centre Redevelopment tbd through further study tbd<br />

St. Francis de Sales Retr<strong>of</strong>it tbd through further study 2009<br />

Waterfront<br />

Waterfront East Community Pavilion $1,000,000 2009<br />

Community Schools<br />

Meeting Spaces (assumes 3,000 square feet. in total across<br />

2 future school locations) <strong>and</strong> gymnasium<br />

$1,300,000 2009<br />

Greenwood Conservation Area<br />

Greenwood Pavilion $400,000 2008/2009<br />

MONTEITH BROWN PLANNING CONSULTANTS in association with Tucker‐Reid & Associates & The JF Group<br />

April 2008<br />

Page 75


Implementation<br />

Table 5b: Outdoor Facilities – Proposed Phasing <strong>Plan</strong><br />

Proposed Location Quantity Cost Proposed<br />

Timing<br />

Soccer Fields (natural turf @ $500,000 for unlit, $800,000 for lit)<br />

Meadows Neighbourhood Park 1 unlit $500,000 2008<br />

A3 (Lajter) Community Park 1 unlit $500,000 2014<br />

A9 Community Park 1 unlit $500,000 2015<br />

Various Other <strong>Town</strong> <strong>Parks</strong> 4 unlit equivalents approx. $2,000,000 tbd<br />

Multi‐Use Fields<br />

<strong>Ajax</strong> Community Centre 1 artificial turf (lit) $1,000,000 2009‐2016<br />

Multi‐Use Courts (@ $100,000 each)<br />

Sportsplex Park (from Table 4c) 2 $200,000 2011<br />

A3 (Lajter) Community Park 2 $200,000 2014<br />

A9 Community Park 2 $200,000 2015<br />

Skateboard Park (@ $250,000 each)<br />

Sportsplex Park (from Table 4c) 1 $250,000 2011<br />

Splash Pads (@ $250,000 each)<br />

<strong>Ajax</strong> Waterfront (or alternate location) 1 $250,000 2009<br />

Sportsplex Park (from Table 4c) 1 $250,000 2011<br />

tbd 1 $250,000 2016<br />

Barrier‐Free Playgrounds (@ $350,000 each)<br />

<strong>Ajax</strong> Waterfront 1 $350,000 2010<br />

Sportsplex Park (from Table 4c) 1 $350,000 2011<br />

St<strong>and</strong>ard Creative Playgrounds (@ $125,000 each)<br />

A8 area 1 $125,000 tbd<br />

A6 area 2 $250,000 tbd<br />

Kerrison Drive 1 $125,000 tbd<br />

S<strong>and</strong> Volleyball Courts<br />

tbd 2 $50,000 2010<br />

Outdoor Skating Path<br />

Sportsplex Park (from Table 4c) 1 $1,000,000 2016<br />

MONTEITH BROWN PLANNING CONSULTANTS in association with Tucker‐Reid & Associates & The JF Group<br />

April 2008<br />

Page 76


Implementation<br />

Table 5c: Other Required Studies – Proposed Phasing <strong>Plan</strong><br />

Proposed Study Cost Proposed<br />

Timing<br />

Indoor Turf Facility Feasibility Study & Business <strong>Plan</strong> $50,000 2009<br />

Youth Centre Feasibility Study & Business <strong>Plan</strong> $15,000 2009<br />

Library Branch Needs Assessment & Feasibility Study $30,000 2009<br />

Paradise Park Redevelopment <strong>Plan</strong> $50,000 2009<br />

Pickering Village Site Development Vision <strong>and</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> $60,000 2011<br />

Memorial Pool Feasibility Study & Business <strong>Plan</strong> $30,000 2012<br />

Multi‐Use Facility Phase 2 (Sportsplex Park) Needs Confirmation Study $30,000 2014<br />

MONTEITH BROWN PLANNING CONSULTANTS in association with Tucker‐Reid & Associates & The JF Group<br />

April 2008<br />

Page 77

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!