Cloud-- scrapers - zafaco
Cloud-- scrapers - zafaco
Cloud-- scrapers - zafaco
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
connect Professional<br />
<strong>Cloud</strong>--<br />
<strong>scrapers</strong><br />
Telephone systems can<br />
also be booked as a cloud<br />
service. When tested,<br />
several offers from the<br />
cloud took a few scrapes.<br />
Virtual phone systems, also known as<br />
“Centrex” in the technical jargon, promise many advantages:<br />
instead of hiring expensive and rapidly obsolete<br />
hardware, the customer subscribes to the IP<br />
switching technology as a cloud service. If he needs<br />
more extensions, he can book them quickly - or cancel<br />
them again if his company gets smaller. All the company<br />
needs is a fast Internet connection, which, alongside<br />
web and e-mail, then also provides the telephony.<br />
And each workplace has to be supplied with an Ethernet<br />
cable, which apart from the PC, also enables an IP<br />
phone to be connected. Or the employees telephone<br />
straight off by client software or mobile phone.<br />
Stress test for virtual telecommunication systems<br />
But do cloud telephone systems really keep what their<br />
providers promise in terms of voice quality and compatibility<br />
To get to the bottom of these questions,<br />
along with its trusted network test partner <strong>zafaco</strong>,<br />
connect put the Centrex services under the microscope<br />
in a four-week stress test. Hannes Rügheimer<br />
Fotos: © Peshkova – shutterstock.de<br />
114 6/2013 115
connect Professional<br />
TeamFON<br />
The clear winner is “TeamSIP Centrex” from TeamFON.<br />
This is all the more remarkable because this provider<br />
does not supply any broadband access of its own.<br />
QSC<br />
A good second place was achieved by IPfonie<br />
Centraflex from QSC: the Cologners deliver a solid<br />
package of ADSL access and Centrex system.<br />
The range of TeamFON from Munich concentrates<br />
entirely on IP switching technology<br />
and, alongside hardware-based IP solutions,<br />
it also offers its own Centrex solution<br />
TeamSIP Centrex for this. This does not mean,<br />
however, that TeamFON makes any<br />
broad band access of its own available; for<br />
our test, the necessary connections were realised<br />
via a DSL 16 000 line from Deutsche<br />
Telekom.<br />
Just as TeamFON does not operate its own<br />
DSL network, this provider also has no mobile<br />
network of its own in its portfolio. However,<br />
the Munich specialists have nevertheless<br />
given a lot of thought to the integration<br />
of smartphones into their Centrex package.<br />
Thus TeamFON offers its own specially developed<br />
iPhone app “TeamSIP 2phone”<br />
which incorporates the Apple mobile in the<br />
Centrex functionalities as a VoIP client.<br />
TeamFON also has clients available for Android<br />
smartphones and BlackBerry devices<br />
with BlackBerry 7. And for all other smartphone<br />
systems the Munich team offers at<br />
least a browser application under the name<br />
“TeamSIP webphone”. In addition, with the<br />
Softphone “TeamSIP 2go” designed for<br />
Windows computers and with the combination<br />
of a web portal and any (also mobile)<br />
additional phones, further alternatives for<br />
the integration of mobile extensions are<br />
available to choose from.<br />
Abundant SIP hardware and software<br />
When booking up to ten extensions, each<br />
TeamSIP connection costs 6.90 Euros/<br />
month net. From the eleventh extension the<br />
price level falls. If you book more than 51<br />
extensions, you only pay 5.90 Euros/month<br />
net for each. The Windows SIP client<br />
TeamSIP 2 go is available for an additional<br />
charge of 2 Euros/month net. TeamFON<br />
recommends Apple Mac users the IP soft<br />
phone “Bria” from the U.S. provider CounterPath<br />
(49.95 U.S. dollars).<br />
Telephone calls to the German fixed network<br />
are charged by TeamFON at 1.4 cents<br />
per minute net. Alternatively, a flat rate can<br />
be booked, which costs 4.90 Euros per<br />
month and per extension. Calls to German<br />
mobile networks cost 11.9 cents net per minute,<br />
and for international calls there is a<br />
price list that can be viewed at the address<br />
www.teamfon.de/tf/de/TeamSIP_Centrex/<br />
preise.<br />
If you also want to buy suitable IP phones<br />
at TeamFON, you have the choice between<br />
several models from the manufacturers<br />
Siemens, Snom, Tiptel, Aastra and<br />
Grandstream - this range is also available<br />
on the website www.team-fon.de. Fundamentally,<br />
however, the service can also be<br />
used with all other SIP-compliant clients<br />
and phones.<br />
When it comes to the switching functions,<br />
TeamSIP shows no weaknesses at all.<br />
Fax support, a company-wide address<br />
book and extensive computer telephony<br />
functions can also be found in the equipment<br />
list.<br />
Top values even without their own DSL<br />
Typically, VoIP providers fare less well if<br />
they do not operate their own access network,<br />
because they have no influence on<br />
the quality-of-service parameters (QoS)<br />
of the broadband line. It is therefore all<br />
the more remarkable that TeamFON was<br />
able to work itself up to top position<br />
among all the candidates in this year’s<br />
test. The error rates of the test connections<br />
via the TeamFON service were the lowest<br />
in the entire test, and voice quality and call<br />
setup times were at a very good level.<br />
Though in at least 12 percent of the connections,<br />
the voice quality sank below the<br />
critical value of 4.0 PESQ (Perceptual Evaluation<br />
of Speech Quality, see also page<br />
122), even that was not enough to challenge<br />
TeamFO’s test victory<br />
connect verdict<br />
good (410 points)<br />
Quickly connected: alongside QSC (orange coloured) TeamFON<br />
(petrol) achieved the fastest call setup times in the test field.<br />
Tidy: the web interface<br />
for administration<br />
is clear and convenient<br />
at TeamSIP.<br />
Efficient: the most<br />
important settings<br />
per participant can<br />
be managed with<br />
a few clicks.<br />
The Cologne-based company QSC is a pioneer<br />
in SDSL connections, but has now also<br />
been providing the more popular ADSL<br />
technology for quite a while. The virtual<br />
phone system tested here, IPfonie Centraflex,<br />
is also based on the 16 000 ADSL connection<br />
“Q-DSL office”. This solution is<br />
offered by QSC from 4.50 Euros per month<br />
and per extension, however with a minimum<br />
purchase of ten extensions. If you<br />
wish, you can rent appropriate IP phones<br />
from a very wide product range from<br />
7 Euros per month. Analogue phones and<br />
fax adapters can also be found in the QSC<br />
range.<br />
Connections within the QSC network are<br />
free of charge – thus also calls between various<br />
branches, provided they all work with<br />
IPfonie Centraflex. Calls to the German<br />
fixed network cost net 1.17 cents per minute,<br />
calls to Telekom and Vodafone mobile<br />
networks cost a full 10.1 cents net per minute,<br />
connections to E-Plus or O2 are somewhat<br />
more expensive at 11.6 cents net<br />
per minute. Unlike at Telekom or Vodafone,<br />
mobile phone contracts are not offered<br />
as part of IPfonie. However, calls to mobile<br />
phones can be mediated, a parallel call to a<br />
mobile is configurable, and also the return<br />
of mobile calls to the Centrex system is<br />
supported. To this end, QSC offers its own<br />
Centraflex app for iOS and Android smartphones.<br />
It’s almost impossible to believe<br />
that an IP telephony provider<br />
without its own network can<br />
deliver such convincing quality<br />
values - but the Munich provider<br />
TeamFON shows that it is possible.<br />
TeamSIP convinces with its<br />
functions, particularly in the integration<br />
of mobile subscribers,<br />
and with its administration.<br />
Extensive options<br />
The Centrex package from QSC is fundamentally<br />
modular in design. In addition to<br />
the standard switching functions, the basic<br />
package tested by us also includes convenient<br />
features such as an individual voice box<br />
per participant and extensive fax capabilities<br />
CONCLUSION (fax to email and email to fax). In addi-<br />
CONCLUSION<br />
tion, using the “Assistant Enterprise” provided<br />
by QSC, phone numbers can be dialled<br />
directly from Outlook - the necessary tools<br />
are available for download on the QSC web<br />
page. Anyone wanting more specialised<br />
functions such as voice-controlled menu<br />
navigation (IVR – “Interactive Voice Response”),<br />
call centre support (ACD – “Automatic<br />
Call Distribution”) or their own client<br />
software for a telephone exchange<br />
(“Receptionist”) can book these as well.<br />
The same goes for the unified communications<br />
software “Estos ProCall”, and multimedia<br />
conferencing, consisting of telephone<br />
and web conferencing, can also<br />
be booked separately as a stand-alone<br />
module.<br />
Good test results, also when faxing<br />
As is usual with Centrex solutions, the<br />
connections booked can be configured via<br />
a web interface. The QSC version poses no<br />
riddles, but still has potential for improvement<br />
when it comes to the details of its<br />
user interface, especially with regard to<br />
the rapid availability of individual, important<br />
settings and information.<br />
On the whole, the measurements carried<br />
out by <strong>zafaco</strong> on behalf of connect<br />
give a pretty good picture of QSC. The<br />
voice transmission parameters measured<br />
in the test connections such as call setup<br />
time, error rates, and the average speech<br />
quality (PESQ) determined are all at a<br />
high level, although still somewhat behind<br />
the results of the test winner TeamFON.<br />
The PESQ value established is only below<br />
the critical level of 4.0 in about 6 percent<br />
of the test connections. The transmission<br />
of faxes via QSC’s IP network is above<br />
average: here the calculated error rate of<br />
1.83 percent is the best value in the entire<br />
test field.<br />
connect verdict<br />
good (390 points)<br />
Reliable quality: parameters such as here the setup time of fax<br />
transfers (QSC: orange) remained largely stable in the test.<br />
Clear, but too many<br />
levels: the control<br />
concept of the web<br />
interface still needs<br />
improvement.<br />
Individually customisable:<br />
a separate<br />
profile can be administered<br />
for each<br />
participant.<br />
The runner-up QSC has no striking<br />
weaknesses in any area, but<br />
is clearly behind the winner<br />
TeamFON in the overall standings.<br />
However, in terms of<br />
points, it has a comparatively<br />
low lead on the next contender<br />
Telekom. The modular extensibility<br />
of the product is also good<br />
and leaves nothing to be desired.<br />
116 6/2013 117
connect Professional<br />
Telekom<br />
The extensive DeutschlandLAN delivers good performance,<br />
except for only one connection type.<br />
With its DeutschlandLAN, Telekom focuses<br />
on business customers with five to 49<br />
employees. The smallest configuration for<br />
five participants took part in the test. The<br />
scope of delivery includes a lot of hardware:<br />
along with the DSL router, VoIP<br />
hardware router and firewall, there are five<br />
IP phones of the type Snom 870. This is<br />
combined with an SDSL line, which transports<br />
10 Mbit/s in both directions, and with<br />
flat rates to all German fixed and mobile<br />
networks. Calls from the mobiles included<br />
to the virtual telephone system at the<br />
company’s headquarters are also free.<br />
However, not only the offer, but also the<br />
monthly price of 495 Euros is imposing.<br />
If five employees really need the hard -<br />
ware and the inclusive tariffs, the offer is<br />
attractive though.<br />
Only minor defects in practice<br />
In practical application, only minor flaws<br />
are apparent. For example, if a mobile user<br />
calls a customer back, his mobile number is<br />
always transmitted – the transfer of the<br />
landline extension number, which is practical<br />
in many cases, is not possible so far. Also,<br />
calls cannot be patched back from the<br />
mobile phone to the company headquarters.<br />
And the web-based administration interface<br />
could be more convenient: although it<br />
positively glows with clarity, some important<br />
information can only be found in<br />
deeper menu levels.<br />
Good measurements with restrictions<br />
The measurement data obtained from <strong>zafaco</strong><br />
is, on the whole, good: an average call<br />
setup time of 1.44 seconds, and a PESQ<br />
value of 4.15 are not to be sneezed at.<br />
However, the voice quality in the scenario<br />
“main office calls home office” sinks to<br />
only 3.8 (PESQ) - this was something that<br />
affected more than 23 percent of the test<br />
connections. Also, the error rate when it<br />
came to the fax connections via the IP line<br />
examined is pretty high, at 7.7 percent.<br />
connect verdict<br />
good (386 points)<br />
CONCLUSION<br />
Top: the user administration is clear,<br />
however, important information is only<br />
available in deeper menu-levels.<br />
Bottom: when connecting the main office<br />
to the home office under a data load, the<br />
PESQ value drops significantly.<br />
Overall, the performance of the Deutschland-<br />
LAN is impressive. However, the voice<br />
quality on some of the test connections<br />
dropped to such an extent, that higher<br />
ranking is not possible.<br />
Vodafone<br />
Officenet offers good intelligibility and rapid call setup,<br />
but suffered a failure during the test period.<br />
The Düsseldorf-based communications<br />
group entered the running with its Centrex<br />
solution “Officenet” which is based on a<br />
DSL line with 16218/800 kbit/s and is characterised<br />
by extensive mobile integration.<br />
Thus, mobile phones can be fully fledged<br />
extensions in the virtual telephone system<br />
and “combined participants” telephone either<br />
via a landline or a mobile phone and<br />
can be reached by parallel call. The Vodafone<br />
network here caters for the integration<br />
of IP telephony and mobile telephony.<br />
Within the participants’ company, all calls<br />
are fundamentally covered by the flat rate.<br />
For an extra charge, further flat rates can be<br />
added - up to the “international” version,<br />
which is valid for many countries.<br />
Many functions, operation acceptable<br />
When it comes to switching and convenience<br />
functions, Vodafone supports everything<br />
that is standard and established.<br />
The only thing that Officenet users have to<br />
do without is unified fax messaging. The<br />
administration interface could be a little<br />
clearer when it comes to viewing the status<br />
of the individual participants. The main<br />
functions are, however, accessible with a<br />
few mouse clicks.<br />
System error during the test period<br />
The measurements collected by <strong>zafaco</strong><br />
give a mixed picture: Vodafone excels<br />
with very good speech intelligibility<br />
(average PESQ value: 4.36 – it was only<br />
below the critical level of 4.0 in about<br />
4 percent of cases) and brisk call setup.<br />
However, during the test period, the<br />
Düsseldorf-based provider experienced<br />
problems in a central network component<br />
for about a day, with the effect that during<br />
this period not many test calls came about.<br />
Since this disorder affected all Officenet<br />
customers, we decided not to exclude it<br />
from the assessment. This led to a relatively<br />
high error rate of 1.4 percent and<br />
cost points.<br />
connect verdict<br />
satisfactory (358 points)<br />
CONCLUSION<br />
Top: the web-based interface could be a<br />
little clearer. Bottom: the call setup<br />
time shown under load (Vodafone: red<br />
curve) rises sharply at the time of the<br />
system error.<br />
A system error over about 20 hours cost<br />
Vodafone valuable points. Without it, the<br />
result for Vodafone would certainly have<br />
been better, especially as the performance<br />
of Officenet as a whole was convincing.<br />
118 6/2013
connect Professional<br />
nfon<br />
The range of functions puts the other candidates in the<br />
shade. However, the measurements provide for losses.<br />
Sipgate<br />
The range of functions and mobile integration is<br />
appealing, but the measurements reveal problems.<br />
The Munich-based provider nfon<br />
delivered its Centrex solution “TK-<br />
Anlage” for our test with an SDSL line,<br />
which, at 2.3 Mbit/s in both directions, is<br />
not outstandingly fast. However, for a<br />
handful of IP telephone connections, the<br />
capacity is more than sufficient, and if<br />
that’s not enough, nfon also offers faster<br />
types of line. The telephone system’s<br />
range of functions is extremely extensive.<br />
nfon provides around 150 telephone<br />
system functions in its network, including<br />
specialties such as the so-called IVR<br />
system (Interactive Voice Response).<br />
Furthermore, the provider supplies an<br />
interface to Microsoft’s unified messaging<br />
solution Lync and the integration<br />
of mobile extensions in cooperation<br />
with O2.<br />
Widest range of functions in the test field<br />
Extensive call centre functions such as<br />
monitoring and voice recording, project<br />
codes and cost centres, customised hold<br />
music and much more are also part of<br />
the package. If the hardware supports it,<br />
IP calls can also be encrypted. And with<br />
the so-called hot desking, employees<br />
can use their extension number to log<br />
on and off the IP phones at various<br />
workstations. Moreover, extensive<br />
unified messaging solutions are part<br />
of the package.<br />
Losses on DTMF and fax<br />
The assessment in this network test is,<br />
however, based solely on the measured<br />
values established by <strong>zafaco</strong> – unfortunately<br />
there are no points for the range<br />
of functions. Therefore, the total score<br />
allocated for nfon is not quite sufficient<br />
for a top spot: though voice quality and<br />
call setup times are, on the whole, okay,<br />
problems for example with the DTMF<br />
and fax transmissions also tested cost a<br />
lot of points.<br />
connect verdict<br />
satisfactory (358 points)<br />
CONCLUSION<br />
Top: the good impression made by the<br />
huge range of functions is confirmed by<br />
the convenient interface.<br />
Bottom: there are high error rates with<br />
fax transmissions (nfon: light blue)<br />
Although it’s not quite enough for a top<br />
position, the Centrex solution from nfon<br />
delivers very reasonable network quality<br />
and thus can easily hold its own against<br />
the competition.<br />
The provider Sipgate, which is also wellknown<br />
among private VoIP customers, provides<br />
a Centrex system for business customers<br />
under the name “Sipgate team”. The<br />
variant “team 3” which took part in the test<br />
is designed for three participants, however,<br />
the Düsseldorf provider also has packages<br />
for up to 250 participants in its range.<br />
However, Sipgate does not provide its own<br />
broadband lines, so in the test, the offer<br />
was examined via a DSL 16 000 Telekom<br />
line. Instead of the connection prices<br />
shown in the table below, flat rates can also<br />
be booked. For a voice flat rate to the fixed<br />
network, Sipgate customers simply pay<br />
double the monthly price, in the present<br />
case, this would, for example, be a further<br />
14.95 Euros.<br />
Mobile integration as MVNO<br />
Comprehensive mobile integration is new<br />
to Sipgate. Here, the provider acts as the<br />
“MVNO” (Mobile Virtual Network Operator):<br />
it provides its customers with<br />
Sipgate’s own SIM cards, however the mobile<br />
phone calls are then transported via the<br />
E-Plus network. Mobile phones which are<br />
thus integrated into the “Sipgate team” are<br />
fully-fledged extensions of the virtual telephone<br />
system, and the control of the switching<br />
functions is carried out via key<br />
codes. Each participant booked can either<br />
be effected as a fixed or mobile extension.<br />
All the settings, such as the outgoing caller<br />
ID, can be determined via the convenient<br />
web interface.<br />
Mixed measurement results<br />
In the current test, which is limited to<br />
fixed-line extensions, Sipgate loses a lot of<br />
points though. The speech delay of 231<br />
milliseconds is, for example, conspicuously<br />
high. Almost 27 percent of the connections<br />
remain below the critical PESQ value<br />
of 4.0. And more than half of the attempted<br />
fax connections failed<br />
connect verdict<br />
sufficient (282 points)<br />
Successful: the convenient<br />
configuration<br />
of Sipgate serves<br />
as a shining example<br />
for all the other<br />
candidates.<br />
CONCLUSION<br />
The new mobile extensions offered by Sipgate<br />
played no role in this test, and in the<br />
fixed network measurements, the very convenient<br />
service unfortunately came bottom<br />
of the table.<br />
vio:networks<br />
Berlin-based provider delivers a decent Centrex<br />
product with generally acceptable results.<br />
With vio:pbx, the Berlin-based company<br />
vio:networks offers an extensive Centrex<br />
solution. According to the provider, the<br />
virtual phone system can be scaled for<br />
between three and 1,000 people. The<br />
prices are graded: starting at 6.50 Euros<br />
net per person, per month, and from ten<br />
participants discounts apply. The scope<br />
of services not only includes the standard<br />
switching functions, but also unified<br />
communications functions such as CTI<br />
(Computer Telephony Integration), instant<br />
messaging, PC fax functions or mobile<br />
phone integration. Like TeamFON and<br />
Sipgate, however, vio:networks also has<br />
no broadband connection of its own,<br />
which is why we tested their offer via<br />
a DSL 16 000 Telekom line.<br />
Up to three devices per extension<br />
Per extension, up to three end devices<br />
can be used, for example an IP phone, a<br />
PC telephony client and a mobile phone.<br />
For all three, the extension number of the<br />
virtual system can be transferred for<br />
outgoing calls. Also telephone conferences,<br />
the implementation of interactive voice<br />
response systems, waiting loops, and<br />
many other features are included in the<br />
scope of services. The configuration is<br />
web based, but could be clearer and<br />
more convenient for most of the solutions<br />
tested.<br />
Decent overall measurement results<br />
In the network test conducted by <strong>zafaco</strong>,<br />
on the whole, vio:pbx achieved decent<br />
results. Call setup times and voice quality<br />
gave no cause for complaint; only connections<br />
from the home office to the<br />
simulated headquarters saw a significant<br />
rise in the error rate on several days of<br />
testing. In the DTMF and fax test, the<br />
solution from vio:pbx put up a good fight.<br />
All in all, transmission times and error<br />
rates were all within an acceptable<br />
range here.<br />
connect verdict<br />
satisfactory (338 points)<br />
CONCLUSION<br />
Top: the admin interface could give more<br />
detailed information. Bottom: on several<br />
days of testing, the error rates increased<br />
for connections from the home office to the<br />
main office (vio:networks: purple)<br />
Apart from a few exceptions in the connections<br />
between the simulated home office and<br />
the simulated company headquarters, the<br />
virtual phone system from vio:networks<br />
earned respectable test results.<br />
VIRTUAL TELEPHONE SYSTEMS: FEATURES AND PRICES<br />
PROVIDER Teamfon QSC Telekom Vodafone nfon vio:networks sipgate<br />
Product<br />
TeamSIP<br />
Centrex<br />
IPfonie<br />
centraflex<br />
DeutschlandLAN<br />
Classic<br />
OfficeNet<br />
nfon TK-Anlage<br />
+ nconnect 2500<br />
vio:pbx sipgate team 3<br />
Price<br />
5.90-6.90 Euros/month From 4.50 Euros/month and ext.; From 495 Euros/month for From 7.95 Euros/month and 6.80 Euros/month and ext.;<br />
14.95 Euros/month for 3<br />
and extension<br />
6.50 Euros/month and ext.<br />
Q-DSL office 34 Euros/month 5 participants<br />
extension nconnect 2500: 79 Euro/m.<br />
participants<br />
Internet connection (up/down) 16000/1024 kbit/s 1 16100/1024 kbit/s 10000/10000 kbit/s 16128/800 kbit/s 2300/2300 kbit/s 16000/1024 kbit/s 1 16000/1024 kbit/s 1<br />
Conditions<br />
Number of extensions from … to 1 – 1000 10 – 500, more possible 5 – 50 5 – 48 2 – 20 000 3 – 1000 3 – 250<br />
Hardware in scope of delivery<br />
Í (Telephones are offered<br />
for sale)<br />
Í (Optional e.g. from<br />
Aastra or Panasonic)<br />
Å (5 IP Phones Snom 870,<br />
hardware firewall)<br />
Í (6 types of devices on<br />
offer-purchase or rental)<br />
Í<br />
Í<br />
Í (large range of devices<br />
for sale)<br />
Cost of calls to German fixed<br />
1.9 cents/min, alternatively 1.1 cents/min to the<br />
0.84 cents/min;<br />
1,4 cents/min 1,17 cents/min Flat rate<br />
1 cent/min<br />
network<br />
flat rate 2 Euros/ext. nearest second<br />
optional flat rate<br />
… to German mobile networks 11,9 cents/min<br />
D networks: 10,1 cents/min,<br />
E networks: 11,6 cents/min<br />
Flat rate<br />
13.5 cents/min, alternatively 9.9 cents/min to the<br />
flat rate of 3 Euros/ext. nearest second<br />
9 cents/min<br />
10.84 cents/min;<br />
optional flat rate<br />
Internal call/between branches free/free beides kostenlos im QSC-Netz free/free free/free free/free free/free free/free<br />
Minimum term/sales none/none 12 months / 100 Euros/month 24 months/none 24 months/none none/none none/none none/none<br />
Integration of mobile phones<br />
Parallel call/transfer mobile-landline Å/Å Å/Í Å/Í Å/Å Å /Å Å/Å Å/Å<br />
Call forwarding/toggling/call<br />
back to mobile phone<br />
Å/Å/Å Å/Å/Í Å/Å/Å Å/Å/Å Å/Å/Å Å/Å/Å Å/Å/Å<br />
VoIP client for smartphones<br />
Å (iOS, Android,<br />
Blackberry 7)<br />
Å (iOS, Android) Í Í<br />
Å/Å (iOS, Android,<br />
Blackberry, Symbian)<br />
Å/Å (iOS, Android)<br />
Í (mobiles integrated via<br />
Sipgate SIM card)<br />
Switching/luxury functions<br />
Softphone Windows/Mac Å/Å Å/Å Å/Í Å/Í Å/Å Å/Å Å/Å<br />
Presence-/CTI functions<br />
Å/Å Å/Å Å/Å ( CTI via third-party provider) Å/Å Å/Å Å/Å Å (online)/Å<br />
(computer telephony)<br />
Call forwarding/answer phone per ext. Å/Å Å/Å Å/Å (Voicemail T-Mobile) Å/Å Å/Å Å/Å Å/Å<br />
Queue, boss/secretary Å/Å Å/Å Í/Å Å/Å Å/Å Å/Å Í/Í<br />
Company-wide address book Å Å Å Å Å Å Å<br />
Fax to PC, PC to fax Å / Å Å / Å optional/optional Í / Í Å/Å Å/Å Å/Å<br />
Conferencing<br />
Tel./web/video conferences Å/Í/Í optional/optional/Í Å/Å/Å Å/Å/Å Å /Í/Í Å/Í/Í Í/Í/Í<br />
Desktop sharing/file sharing Í/Í Í/Í Å/Å Å/Å Í/Í Í/Í Í/Í<br />
Special features<br />
Own softphone client with<br />
instant messaging and<br />
Outlook integration, call<br />
centre functions (ACD)<br />
Assistant Enterprise (dial<br />
from Outlook) TAPI 2.1,<br />
Receptionist (switching<br />
platform); Unified Communications<br />
(ESTOS Call Pro<br />
Enterprise)<br />
Valid April 2013; all prices are net (plus 19% VAT) 1 No own access offer, tested with Telekom DSL 16 000<br />
Subsidised phones as<br />
part of the package for a<br />
surcharge<br />
Indiv. flat rates up to international<br />
flat available per ext.;<br />
mobile phone integration without<br />
additional software, fixed<br />
network prices at com-pany<br />
locations; attendant console<br />
Automatic tel. config.; over<br />
150 system functions;<br />
(Pickup, IVR ...), voice<br />
encryption; integration<br />
MS Lync; integr. with O2<br />
(“Office Voice <strong>Cloud</strong>”)<br />
Discount system from ten<br />
extensions; IVR, conference<br />
rooms, waiting loops, etc.<br />
included free-of-charge<br />
Fixed line ext. no. recognition<br />
on outgoing mobile<br />
phone calls; transcripts of<br />
voice mails; SMS rec. also<br />
via web or landline; complete<br />
online management<br />
120 6/2013 121
connect Professional<br />
HOW CONNECT AND ZAFACO TEST<br />
Connect is again cooperating with<br />
the renowned fixed-network test<br />
Institute <strong>zafaco</strong>.<br />
From 18 March to 14 April 2013 (four<br />
weeks), <strong>zafaco</strong> set up around 50 000<br />
test connections with its equipment<br />
and put the network quality of our candidates<br />
under the microscope.<br />
In order to reproduce realistic<br />
conditions, the measurement setup<br />
used several sites, which simulated<br />
a headquarters in a city with<br />
several home offices distributed<br />
around Germany.<br />
To this end, <strong>zafaco</strong> used hardware installations<br />
in Düsseldorf, Kiel, Magdeburg,<br />
Munich and Nuremberg. Participants<br />
with their own network connections<br />
made this available in the test<br />
centre with the related hardware. For<br />
Sipgate, TeamFON and vio:networks,<br />
standard 16 000 DSL connections from<br />
the market leader Telecom were used.<br />
FritzBoxes of the type 7390 served for<br />
the network connection. In each of the<br />
cities Düsseldorf, Kiel, Magdeburg, Munich<br />
and Nuremberg an industrial PC<br />
set up the connections. By way of reference,<br />
<strong>zafaco</strong> also determined the qua-<br />
lity of connections via the conventional<br />
ISDN network. For this, several quad<br />
ISDN cards and the corresponding<br />
ISDN connections were used.<br />
The SIP connections were set up by<br />
PC softphones.<br />
Different connection types were<br />
taken into account for the measurements.<br />
Using the hardware constellation described,<br />
the experts set up several scenarios<br />
- calls from SIP to ISDN, from<br />
ISDN to SIP and from SIP-to-SIP - in<br />
practice therefore within the IP networks<br />
of the respective candidates.<br />
Here, how the IP connections behave<br />
under load played an important role. To<br />
simulate a realistic load on the internet<br />
lines, parallel to the telephone calls the<br />
test system carried out FTP uploads<br />
and HTTP downloads of large test files.<br />
The voice calls were carried out with<br />
the typical G.711 codec that does not<br />
use voice compression.<br />
The values measured are collected<br />
in the table below.<br />
The averages of the values collected<br />
per candidate in around 6000 individual<br />
connections were used as a basis for<br />
awarding points. However, the deviation<br />
from the average also flowed<br />
into the assessment. The idea behind<br />
this: big differences are more noticeable<br />
in everyday life than when dialling<br />
anyway takes a bit longer. If many<br />
connections took more than five<br />
seconds for a connection, this led to<br />
the deduction of points. This also applied<br />
to connections that broke off because<br />
of high error rates. To evaluate<br />
the speech intelligibility, <strong>zafaco</strong> determined<br />
the so-called PESQ value<br />
(Perceptual Evaluation of Speech Quality).<br />
This is an ITU-T standardised process<br />
for measuring the intelligibility of<br />
voice transmission. Values between 4.0<br />
and 4.5 stand for very good voice<br />
transmission, a value of 3.5 corresponds<br />
to a good mobile connection,<br />
and below 2.7 the intelligibility decreases.<br />
A further set of measurement values<br />
represents the language delay. If<br />
this exceeds 150 milliseconds, it starts<br />
to have a disturbing effect - as known<br />
from trans-Atlantic satellite links, especially<br />
as calls to the mobile network, to<br />
DECT phones or via Bluetooth headsets<br />
add further delays.<br />
Hardware in continuous operation: all<br />
systems tested were running day and<br />
night in Düsseldorf, Kiel, Magdeburg,<br />
Munich and Nuremberg and delivered<br />
approximately 50 000 test in four weeks.<br />
<strong>zafaco</strong> also took dual-tone multifrequencies<br />
(DTMF) and fax transmissions<br />
into account.<br />
DTMF tones are especially important<br />
for the operation of voice menus on<br />
hotlines and information services. And<br />
as Centrex lines are intended to replace<br />
the traditional telephone line, they<br />
should be able to cope with fax machines.<br />
For this we determined transmission<br />
times and error rates. If the fax<br />
was not transmitted after 180 seconds,<br />
the transmission was stopped.<br />
TELEFON-<br />
ANLAGE<br />
AUS DER<br />
CLOUD!<br />
Die Zukunft der Business-Kommunikation:<br />
endlos kostenlose Updates<br />
Über 5.000 zufriedene Unternehmen nutzen nfon, z.B.:<br />
MEASUREMENTS AND TEST RESULTS<br />
Provider teamFON QSC Telekom Vodafone nfon vio:networks sipgate<br />
ISDN<br />
reference<br />
MEASUREMENTS<br />
Number of test samples speech and DTMF 5066 5081 4575 5009 4946 5082 4786 4745<br />
Number of test samples fax 1173 1256 1208 1195 1256 1211 1234 1194<br />
CONNECT SETUP DURATION<br />
Connect Setup Duration 1,68 1,58 1,44 1,84 1,41 1,77 1,87 2,47<br />
Connect Setup Duration (standard deviation) s 1,61 1,72 0,99 1,57 1,32 1,58 1,48 0,69<br />
Connect Setup Duration > 5 sec % 1,13 1,51 0,18 3,95 1,14 1,15 1,54 0,34<br />
CALL FAILURE RATE<br />
Call Failure Ratio % 0,12 0,65 0,35 1,40 0,71 1,06 0,81 0<br />
VOICE QUALITY<br />
PESQ MOS 4,26 4,32 4,15 4,36 4,31 4,32 4,11 4,45<br />
PESQ MOS (standard deviation) 0,20 0,17 0,27 0,14 0,20 0,16 0,29 0,02<br />
PESQ MOS < 4 % 12,08 6,42 23,24 4,05 7,85 6,33 26,9 0<br />
SPEECH DELAY<br />
Speech delay ms 143,13 133,18 149,05 119,61 128,93 138,46 231,32 19,72<br />
Speech delay (standard deviation ms 33,33 22,43 41,40 18,60 23,04 18,96 62,41 2,34<br />
Speech delay > 150 ms % 39,11 25,56 36,37 12,98 25,69 36,39 89,22 0<br />
DTMF AND FAX<br />
DTMF Errors % 1,71 2,28 2,41 1,51 2,05 1,52 3,64 0<br />
Fax Setup Duration s 45,5 40,3 48,6 34,2 39,1 45,6 33,74 30,56<br />
Fax Transmission Duration s 94,3 86,0 79,0 80,0 94,0 94,3 94,0 81,8<br />
Fax Failure Ratio % 3,33 1,83 7,70 2,59 12,6 4,62 51,38 1,68<br />
TEST RESULTS<br />
Connect Setup Duration max. 40 30 26 40 14 34 30 28 36<br />
Call Failure Ratio max. 200 200 160 200 120 160 120 160 200<br />
Voice Quality max. 80 68 76 56 76 72 76 56 80<br />
Speech Delay max. 40 40 52 36 64 52 48 8 80<br />
DTMF transmission max. 40 32 24 24 32 24 32 16 40<br />
Fax transmission max. 60 40 52 30 52 12 32 14 60<br />
122 6/2013<br />
VERDICT(max. 500)<br />
410<br />
good<br />
390<br />
good<br />
386<br />
good<br />
358<br />
satisfactory<br />
354<br />
satisfactory<br />
338<br />
satisfactory<br />
282<br />
sufficient<br />
494<br />
very good<br />
CONCLUSION<br />
Hannes Rügheimer,<br />
connect specialist<br />
<strong>zafaco</strong> and connect last tested virtual<br />
phone systems in the issue 11/2011.<br />
Comparing the previous results with this<br />
year’s rankings reveals some surprises.<br />
The most impressive thing is the rise of<br />
the test winner TeamFON: from last place back then to first place now! And that’s<br />
although TeamFON still does not operate its own DSL network. With the combination of<br />
its own DSL network and its virtual telephone system, QSC achieved a good second<br />
place. The Cologne-based team was also well ahead in 2011. The offers from Telecom<br />
and Vodafone have slipped from pole position to midfield.<br />
With Telekom’s DeutschlandLAN it was above all deficiencies in voice quality in some<br />
of the connections that prevented a better result. The Vodafone product Officenet had<br />
a bit of bad luck: without the system error which occurred during the test period, the<br />
Düsseldorf-based company would probably have fared much better. nfon, vio:networks<br />
and, lagging slightly behind, Sipgate, also offer decent Centrex solutions, which, however,<br />
experienced difficulties in some situations. For these offers therefore is, techni cally<br />
speaking, still room for improvement.<br />
Erfolgreiches Geschäft beginnt mit nfon:<br />
ndless business communication<br />
08000-636624<br />
www.nfon.net/tk