28.12.2014 Views

Cloud-- scrapers - zafaco

Cloud-- scrapers - zafaco

Cloud-- scrapers - zafaco

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

connect Professional<br />

<strong>Cloud</strong>--<br />

<strong>scrapers</strong><br />

Telephone systems can<br />

also be booked as a cloud<br />

service. When tested,<br />

several offers from the<br />

cloud took a few scrapes.<br />

Virtual phone systems, also known as<br />

“Centrex” in the technical jargon, promise many advantages:<br />

instead of hiring expensive and rapidly obsolete<br />

hardware, the customer subscribes to the IP<br />

switching technology as a cloud service. If he needs<br />

more extensions, he can book them quickly - or cancel<br />

them again if his company gets smaller. All the company<br />

needs is a fast Internet connection, which, alongside<br />

web and e-mail, then also provides the telephony.<br />

And each workplace has to be supplied with an Ethernet<br />

cable, which apart from the PC, also enables an IP<br />

phone to be connected. Or the employees telephone<br />

straight off by client software or mobile phone.<br />

Stress test for virtual telecommunication systems<br />

But do cloud telephone systems really keep what their<br />

providers promise in terms of voice quality and compatibility<br />

To get to the bottom of these questions,<br />

along with its trusted network test partner <strong>zafaco</strong>,<br />

connect put the Centrex services under the microscope<br />

in a four-week stress test. Hannes Rügheimer<br />

Fotos: © Peshkova – shutterstock.de<br />

114 6/2013 115


connect Professional<br />

TeamFON<br />

The clear winner is “TeamSIP Centrex” from TeamFON.<br />

This is all the more remarkable because this provider<br />

does not supply any broadband access of its own.<br />

QSC<br />

A good second place was achieved by IPfonie<br />

Centraflex from QSC: the Cologners deliver a solid<br />

package of ADSL access and Centrex system.<br />

The range of TeamFON from Munich concentrates<br />

entirely on IP switching technology<br />

and, alongside hardware-based IP solutions,<br />

it also offers its own Centrex solution<br />

TeamSIP Centrex for this. This does not mean,<br />

however, that TeamFON makes any<br />

broad band access of its own available; for<br />

our test, the necessary connections were realised<br />

via a DSL 16 000 line from Deutsche<br />

Telekom.<br />

Just as TeamFON does not operate its own<br />

DSL network, this provider also has no mobile<br />

network of its own in its portfolio. However,<br />

the Munich specialists have nevertheless<br />

given a lot of thought to the integration<br />

of smartphones into their Centrex package.<br />

Thus TeamFON offers its own specially developed<br />

iPhone app “TeamSIP 2phone”<br />

which incorporates the Apple mobile in the<br />

Centrex functionalities as a VoIP client.<br />

TeamFON also has clients available for Android<br />

smartphones and BlackBerry devices<br />

with BlackBerry 7. And for all other smartphone<br />

systems the Munich team offers at<br />

least a browser application under the name<br />

“TeamSIP webphone”. In addition, with the<br />

Softphone “TeamSIP 2go” designed for<br />

Windows computers and with the combination<br />

of a web portal and any (also mobile)<br />

additional phones, further alternatives for<br />

the integration of mobile extensions are<br />

available to choose from.<br />

Abundant SIP hardware and software<br />

When booking up to ten extensions, each<br />

TeamSIP connection costs 6.90 Euros/<br />

month net. From the eleventh extension the<br />

price level falls. If you book more than 51<br />

extensions, you only pay 5.90 Euros/month<br />

net for each. The Windows SIP client<br />

TeamSIP 2 go is available for an additional<br />

charge of 2 Euros/month net. TeamFON<br />

recommends Apple Mac users the IP soft<br />

phone “Bria” from the U.S. provider CounterPath<br />

(49.95 U.S. dollars).<br />

Telephone calls to the German fixed network<br />

are charged by TeamFON at 1.4 cents<br />

per minute net. Alternatively, a flat rate can<br />

be booked, which costs 4.90 Euros per<br />

month and per extension. Calls to German<br />

mobile networks cost 11.9 cents net per minute,<br />

and for international calls there is a<br />

price list that can be viewed at the address<br />

www.teamfon.de/tf/de/TeamSIP_Centrex/<br />

preise.<br />

If you also want to buy suitable IP phones<br />

at TeamFON, you have the choice between<br />

several models from the manufacturers<br />

Siemens, Snom, Tiptel, Aastra and<br />

Grandstream - this range is also available<br />

on the website www.team-fon.de. Fundamentally,<br />

however, the service can also be<br />

used with all other SIP-compliant clients<br />

and phones.<br />

When it comes to the switching functions,<br />

TeamSIP shows no weaknesses at all.<br />

Fax support, a company-wide address<br />

book and extensive computer telephony<br />

functions can also be found in the equipment<br />

list.<br />

Top values even without their own DSL<br />

Typically, VoIP providers fare less well if<br />

they do not operate their own access network,<br />

because they have no influence on<br />

the quality-of-service parameters (QoS)<br />

of the broadband line. It is therefore all<br />

the more remarkable that TeamFON was<br />

able to work itself up to top position<br />

among all the candidates in this year’s<br />

test. The error rates of the test connections<br />

via the TeamFON service were the lowest<br />

in the entire test, and voice quality and call<br />

setup times were at a very good level.<br />

Though in at least 12 percent of the connections,<br />

the voice quality sank below the<br />

critical value of 4.0 PESQ (Perceptual Evaluation<br />

of Speech Quality, see also page<br />

122), even that was not enough to challenge<br />

TeamFO’s test victory<br />

connect verdict<br />

good (410 points)<br />

Quickly connected: alongside QSC (orange coloured) TeamFON<br />

(petrol) achieved the fastest call setup times in the test field.<br />

Tidy: the web interface<br />

for administration<br />

is clear and convenient<br />

at TeamSIP.<br />

Efficient: the most<br />

important settings<br />

per participant can<br />

be managed with<br />

a few clicks.<br />

The Cologne-based company QSC is a pioneer<br />

in SDSL connections, but has now also<br />

been providing the more popular ADSL<br />

technology for quite a while. The virtual<br />

phone system tested here, IPfonie Centraflex,<br />

is also based on the 16 000 ADSL connection<br />

“Q-DSL office”. This solution is<br />

offered by QSC from 4.50 Euros per month<br />

and per extension, however with a minimum<br />

purchase of ten extensions. If you<br />

wish, you can rent appropriate IP phones<br />

from a very wide product range from<br />

7 Euros per month. Analogue phones and<br />

fax adapters can also be found in the QSC<br />

range.<br />

Connections within the QSC network are<br />

free of charge – thus also calls between various<br />

branches, provided they all work with<br />

IPfonie Centraflex. Calls to the German<br />

fixed network cost net 1.17 cents per minute,<br />

calls to Telekom and Vodafone mobile<br />

networks cost a full 10.1 cents net per minute,<br />

connections to E-Plus or O2 are somewhat<br />

more expensive at 11.6 cents net<br />

per minute. Unlike at Telekom or Vodafone,<br />

mobile phone contracts are not offered<br />

as part of IPfonie. However, calls to mobile<br />

phones can be mediated, a parallel call to a<br />

mobile is configurable, and also the return<br />

of mobile calls to the Centrex system is<br />

supported. To this end, QSC offers its own<br />

Centraflex app for iOS and Android smartphones.<br />

It’s almost impossible to believe<br />

that an IP telephony provider<br />

without its own network can<br />

deliver such convincing quality<br />

values - but the Munich provider<br />

TeamFON shows that it is possible.<br />

TeamSIP convinces with its<br />

functions, particularly in the integration<br />

of mobile subscribers,<br />

and with its administration.<br />

Extensive options<br />

The Centrex package from QSC is fundamentally<br />

modular in design. In addition to<br />

the standard switching functions, the basic<br />

package tested by us also includes convenient<br />

features such as an individual voice box<br />

per participant and extensive fax capabilities<br />

CONCLUSION (fax to email and email to fax). In addi-<br />

CONCLUSION<br />

tion, using the “Assistant Enterprise” provided<br />

by QSC, phone numbers can be dialled<br />

directly from Outlook - the necessary tools<br />

are available for download on the QSC web<br />

page. Anyone wanting more specialised<br />

functions such as voice-controlled menu<br />

navigation (IVR – “Interactive Voice Response”),<br />

call centre support (ACD – “Automatic<br />

Call Distribution”) or their own client<br />

software for a telephone exchange<br />

(“Receptionist”) can book these as well.<br />

The same goes for the unified communications<br />

software “Estos ProCall”, and multimedia<br />

conferencing, consisting of telephone<br />

and web conferencing, can also<br />

be booked separately as a stand-alone<br />

module.<br />

Good test results, also when faxing<br />

As is usual with Centrex solutions, the<br />

connections booked can be configured via<br />

a web interface. The QSC version poses no<br />

riddles, but still has potential for improvement<br />

when it comes to the details of its<br />

user interface, especially with regard to<br />

the rapid availability of individual, important<br />

settings and information.<br />

On the whole, the measurements carried<br />

out by <strong>zafaco</strong> on behalf of connect<br />

give a pretty good picture of QSC. The<br />

voice transmission parameters measured<br />

in the test connections such as call setup<br />

time, error rates, and the average speech<br />

quality (PESQ) determined are all at a<br />

high level, although still somewhat behind<br />

the results of the test winner TeamFON.<br />

The PESQ value established is only below<br />

the critical level of 4.0 in about 6 percent<br />

of the test connections. The transmission<br />

of faxes via QSC’s IP network is above<br />

average: here the calculated error rate of<br />

1.83 percent is the best value in the entire<br />

test field.<br />

connect verdict<br />

good (390 points)<br />

Reliable quality: parameters such as here the setup time of fax<br />

transfers (QSC: orange) remained largely stable in the test.<br />

Clear, but too many<br />

levels: the control<br />

concept of the web<br />

interface still needs<br />

improvement.<br />

Individually customisable:<br />

a separate<br />

profile can be administered<br />

for each<br />

participant.<br />

The runner-up QSC has no striking<br />

weaknesses in any area, but<br />

is clearly behind the winner<br />

TeamFON in the overall standings.<br />

However, in terms of<br />

points, it has a comparatively<br />

low lead on the next contender<br />

Telekom. The modular extensibility<br />

of the product is also good<br />

and leaves nothing to be desired.<br />

116 6/2013 117


connect Professional<br />

Telekom<br />

The extensive DeutschlandLAN delivers good performance,<br />

except for only one connection type.<br />

With its DeutschlandLAN, Telekom focuses<br />

on business customers with five to 49<br />

employees. The smallest configuration for<br />

five participants took part in the test. The<br />

scope of delivery includes a lot of hardware:<br />

along with the DSL router, VoIP<br />

hardware router and firewall, there are five<br />

IP phones of the type Snom 870. This is<br />

combined with an SDSL line, which transports<br />

10 Mbit/s in both directions, and with<br />

flat rates to all German fixed and mobile<br />

networks. Calls from the mobiles included<br />

to the virtual telephone system at the<br />

company’s headquarters are also free.<br />

However, not only the offer, but also the<br />

monthly price of 495 Euros is imposing.<br />

If five employees really need the hard -<br />

ware and the inclusive tariffs, the offer is<br />

attractive though.<br />

Only minor defects in practice<br />

In practical application, only minor flaws<br />

are apparent. For example, if a mobile user<br />

calls a customer back, his mobile number is<br />

always transmitted – the transfer of the<br />

landline extension number, which is practical<br />

in many cases, is not possible so far. Also,<br />

calls cannot be patched back from the<br />

mobile phone to the company headquarters.<br />

And the web-based administration interface<br />

could be more convenient: although it<br />

positively glows with clarity, some important<br />

information can only be found in<br />

deeper menu levels.<br />

Good measurements with restrictions<br />

The measurement data obtained from <strong>zafaco</strong><br />

is, on the whole, good: an average call<br />

setup time of 1.44 seconds, and a PESQ<br />

value of 4.15 are not to be sneezed at.<br />

However, the voice quality in the scenario<br />

“main office calls home office” sinks to<br />

only 3.8 (PESQ) - this was something that<br />

affected more than 23 percent of the test<br />

connections. Also, the error rate when it<br />

came to the fax connections via the IP line<br />

examined is pretty high, at 7.7 percent.<br />

connect verdict<br />

good (386 points)<br />

CONCLUSION<br />

Top: the user administration is clear,<br />

however, important information is only<br />

available in deeper menu-levels.<br />

Bottom: when connecting the main office<br />

to the home office under a data load, the<br />

PESQ value drops significantly.<br />

Overall, the performance of the Deutschland-<br />

LAN is impressive. However, the voice<br />

quality on some of the test connections<br />

dropped to such an extent, that higher<br />

ranking is not possible.<br />

Vodafone<br />

Officenet offers good intelligibility and rapid call setup,<br />

but suffered a failure during the test period.<br />

The Düsseldorf-based communications<br />

group entered the running with its Centrex<br />

solution “Officenet” which is based on a<br />

DSL line with 16218/800 kbit/s and is characterised<br />

by extensive mobile integration.<br />

Thus, mobile phones can be fully fledged<br />

extensions in the virtual telephone system<br />

and “combined participants” telephone either<br />

via a landline or a mobile phone and<br />

can be reached by parallel call. The Vodafone<br />

network here caters for the integration<br />

of IP telephony and mobile telephony.<br />

Within the participants’ company, all calls<br />

are fundamentally covered by the flat rate.<br />

For an extra charge, further flat rates can be<br />

added - up to the “international” version,<br />

which is valid for many countries.<br />

Many functions, operation acceptable<br />

When it comes to switching and convenience<br />

functions, Vodafone supports everything<br />

that is standard and established.<br />

The only thing that Officenet users have to<br />

do without is unified fax messaging. The<br />

administration interface could be a little<br />

clearer when it comes to viewing the status<br />

of the individual participants. The main<br />

functions are, however, accessible with a<br />

few mouse clicks.<br />

System error during the test period<br />

The measurements collected by <strong>zafaco</strong><br />

give a mixed picture: Vodafone excels<br />

with very good speech intelligibility<br />

(average PESQ value: 4.36 – it was only<br />

below the critical level of 4.0 in about<br />

4 percent of cases) and brisk call setup.<br />

However, during the test period, the<br />

Düsseldorf-based provider experienced<br />

problems in a central network component<br />

for about a day, with the effect that during<br />

this period not many test calls came about.<br />

Since this disorder affected all Officenet<br />

customers, we decided not to exclude it<br />

from the assessment. This led to a relatively<br />

high error rate of 1.4 percent and<br />

cost points.<br />

connect verdict<br />

satisfactory (358 points)<br />

CONCLUSION<br />

Top: the web-based interface could be a<br />

little clearer. Bottom: the call setup<br />

time shown under load (Vodafone: red<br />

curve) rises sharply at the time of the<br />

system error.<br />

A system error over about 20 hours cost<br />

Vodafone valuable points. Without it, the<br />

result for Vodafone would certainly have<br />

been better, especially as the performance<br />

of Officenet as a whole was convincing.<br />

118 6/2013


connect Professional<br />

nfon<br />

The range of functions puts the other candidates in the<br />

shade. However, the measurements provide for losses.<br />

Sipgate<br />

The range of functions and mobile integration is<br />

appealing, but the measurements reveal problems.<br />

The Munich-based provider nfon<br />

delivered its Centrex solution “TK-<br />

Anlage” for our test with an SDSL line,<br />

which, at 2.3 Mbit/s in both directions, is<br />

not outstandingly fast. However, for a<br />

handful of IP telephone connections, the<br />

capacity is more than sufficient, and if<br />

that’s not enough, nfon also offers faster<br />

types of line. The telephone system’s<br />

range of functions is extremely extensive.<br />

nfon provides around 150 telephone<br />

system functions in its network, including<br />

specialties such as the so-called IVR<br />

system (Interactive Voice Response).<br />

Furthermore, the provider supplies an<br />

interface to Microsoft’s unified messaging<br />

solution Lync and the integration<br />

of mobile extensions in cooperation<br />

with O2.<br />

Widest range of functions in the test field<br />

Extensive call centre functions such as<br />

monitoring and voice recording, project<br />

codes and cost centres, customised hold<br />

music and much more are also part of<br />

the package. If the hardware supports it,<br />

IP calls can also be encrypted. And with<br />

the so-called hot desking, employees<br />

can use their extension number to log<br />

on and off the IP phones at various<br />

workstations. Moreover, extensive<br />

unified messaging solutions are part<br />

of the package.<br />

Losses on DTMF and fax<br />

The assessment in this network test is,<br />

however, based solely on the measured<br />

values established by <strong>zafaco</strong> – unfortunately<br />

there are no points for the range<br />

of functions. Therefore, the total score<br />

allocated for nfon is not quite sufficient<br />

for a top spot: though voice quality and<br />

call setup times are, on the whole, okay,<br />

problems for example with the DTMF<br />

and fax transmissions also tested cost a<br />

lot of points.<br />

connect verdict<br />

satisfactory (358 points)<br />

CONCLUSION<br />

Top: the good impression made by the<br />

huge range of functions is confirmed by<br />

the convenient interface.<br />

Bottom: there are high error rates with<br />

fax transmissions (nfon: light blue)<br />

Although it’s not quite enough for a top<br />

position, the Centrex solution from nfon<br />

delivers very reasonable network quality<br />

and thus can easily hold its own against<br />

the competition.<br />

The provider Sipgate, which is also wellknown<br />

among private VoIP customers, provides<br />

a Centrex system for business customers<br />

under the name “Sipgate team”. The<br />

variant “team 3” which took part in the test<br />

is designed for three participants, however,<br />

the Düsseldorf provider also has packages<br />

for up to 250 participants in its range.<br />

However, Sipgate does not provide its own<br />

broadband lines, so in the test, the offer<br />

was examined via a DSL 16 000 Telekom<br />

line. Instead of the connection prices<br />

shown in the table below, flat rates can also<br />

be booked. For a voice flat rate to the fixed<br />

network, Sipgate customers simply pay<br />

double the monthly price, in the present<br />

case, this would, for example, be a further<br />

14.95 Euros.<br />

Mobile integration as MVNO<br />

Comprehensive mobile integration is new<br />

to Sipgate. Here, the provider acts as the<br />

“MVNO” (Mobile Virtual Network Operator):<br />

it provides its customers with<br />

Sipgate’s own SIM cards, however the mobile<br />

phone calls are then transported via the<br />

E-Plus network. Mobile phones which are<br />

thus integrated into the “Sipgate team” are<br />

fully-fledged extensions of the virtual telephone<br />

system, and the control of the switching<br />

functions is carried out via key<br />

codes. Each participant booked can either<br />

be effected as a fixed or mobile extension.<br />

All the settings, such as the outgoing caller<br />

ID, can be determined via the convenient<br />

web interface.<br />

Mixed measurement results<br />

In the current test, which is limited to<br />

fixed-line extensions, Sipgate loses a lot of<br />

points though. The speech delay of 231<br />

milliseconds is, for example, conspicuously<br />

high. Almost 27 percent of the connections<br />

remain below the critical PESQ value<br />

of 4.0. And more than half of the attempted<br />

fax connections failed<br />

connect verdict<br />

sufficient (282 points)<br />

Successful: the convenient<br />

configuration<br />

of Sipgate serves<br />

as a shining example<br />

for all the other<br />

candidates.<br />

CONCLUSION<br />

The new mobile extensions offered by Sipgate<br />

played no role in this test, and in the<br />

fixed network measurements, the very convenient<br />

service unfortunately came bottom<br />

of the table.<br />

vio:networks<br />

Berlin-based provider delivers a decent Centrex<br />

product with generally acceptable results.<br />

With vio:pbx, the Berlin-based company<br />

vio:networks offers an extensive Centrex<br />

solution. According to the provider, the<br />

virtual phone system can be scaled for<br />

between three and 1,000 people. The<br />

prices are graded: starting at 6.50 Euros<br />

net per person, per month, and from ten<br />

participants discounts apply. The scope<br />

of services not only includes the standard<br />

switching functions, but also unified<br />

communications functions such as CTI<br />

(Computer Telephony Integration), instant<br />

messaging, PC fax functions or mobile<br />

phone integration. Like TeamFON and<br />

Sipgate, however, vio:networks also has<br />

no broadband connection of its own,<br />

which is why we tested their offer via<br />

a DSL 16 000 Telekom line.<br />

Up to three devices per extension<br />

Per extension, up to three end devices<br />

can be used, for example an IP phone, a<br />

PC telephony client and a mobile phone.<br />

For all three, the extension number of the<br />

virtual system can be transferred for<br />

outgoing calls. Also telephone conferences,<br />

the implementation of interactive voice<br />

response systems, waiting loops, and<br />

many other features are included in the<br />

scope of services. The configuration is<br />

web based, but could be clearer and<br />

more convenient for most of the solutions<br />

tested.<br />

Decent overall measurement results<br />

In the network test conducted by <strong>zafaco</strong>,<br />

on the whole, vio:pbx achieved decent<br />

results. Call setup times and voice quality<br />

gave no cause for complaint; only connections<br />

from the home office to the<br />

simulated headquarters saw a significant<br />

rise in the error rate on several days of<br />

testing. In the DTMF and fax test, the<br />

solution from vio:pbx put up a good fight.<br />

All in all, transmission times and error<br />

rates were all within an acceptable<br />

range here.<br />

connect verdict<br />

satisfactory (338 points)<br />

CONCLUSION<br />

Top: the admin interface could give more<br />

detailed information. Bottom: on several<br />

days of testing, the error rates increased<br />

for connections from the home office to the<br />

main office (vio:networks: purple)<br />

Apart from a few exceptions in the connections<br />

between the simulated home office and<br />

the simulated company headquarters, the<br />

virtual phone system from vio:networks<br />

earned respectable test results.<br />

VIRTUAL TELEPHONE SYSTEMS: FEATURES AND PRICES<br />

PROVIDER Teamfon QSC Telekom Vodafone nfon vio:networks sipgate<br />

Product<br />

TeamSIP<br />

Centrex<br />

IPfonie<br />

centraflex<br />

DeutschlandLAN<br />

Classic<br />

OfficeNet<br />

nfon TK-Anlage<br />

+ nconnect 2500<br />

vio:pbx sipgate team 3<br />

Price<br />

5.90-6.90 Euros/month From 4.50 Euros/month and ext.; From 495 Euros/month for From 7.95 Euros/month and 6.80 Euros/month and ext.;<br />

14.95 Euros/month for 3<br />

and extension<br />

6.50 Euros/month and ext.<br />

Q-DSL office 34 Euros/month 5 participants<br />

extension nconnect 2500: 79 Euro/m.<br />

participants<br />

Internet connection (up/down) 16000/1024 kbit/s 1 16100/1024 kbit/s 10000/10000 kbit/s 16128/800 kbit/s 2300/2300 kbit/s 16000/1024 kbit/s 1 16000/1024 kbit/s 1<br />

Conditions<br />

Number of extensions from … to 1 – 1000 10 – 500, more possible 5 – 50 5 – 48 2 – 20 000 3 – 1000 3 – 250<br />

Hardware in scope of delivery<br />

Í (Telephones are offered<br />

for sale)<br />

Í (Optional e.g. from<br />

Aastra or Panasonic)<br />

Å (5 IP Phones Snom 870,<br />

hardware firewall)<br />

Í (6 types of devices on<br />

offer-purchase or rental)<br />

Í<br />

Í<br />

Í (large range of devices<br />

for sale)<br />

Cost of calls to German fixed<br />

1.9 cents/min, alternatively 1.1 cents/min to the<br />

0.84 cents/min;<br />

1,4 cents/min 1,17 cents/min Flat rate<br />

1 cent/min<br />

network<br />

flat rate 2 Euros/ext. nearest second<br />

optional flat rate<br />

… to German mobile networks 11,9 cents/min<br />

D networks: 10,1 cents/min,<br />

E networks: 11,6 cents/min<br />

Flat rate<br />

13.5 cents/min, alternatively 9.9 cents/min to the<br />

flat rate of 3 Euros/ext. nearest second<br />

9 cents/min<br />

10.84 cents/min;<br />

optional flat rate<br />

Internal call/between branches free/free beides kostenlos im QSC-Netz free/free free/free free/free free/free free/free<br />

Minimum term/sales none/none 12 months / 100 Euros/month 24 months/none 24 months/none none/none none/none none/none<br />

Integration of mobile phones<br />

Parallel call/transfer mobile-landline Å/Å Å/Í Å/Í Å/Å Å /Å Å/Å Å/Å<br />

Call forwarding/toggling/call<br />

back to mobile phone<br />

Å/Å/Å Å/Å/Í Å/Å/Å Å/Å/Å Å/Å/Å Å/Å/Å Å/Å/Å<br />

VoIP client for smartphones<br />

Å (iOS, Android,<br />

Blackberry 7)<br />

Å (iOS, Android) Í Í<br />

Å/Å (iOS, Android,<br />

Blackberry, Symbian)<br />

Å/Å (iOS, Android)<br />

Í (mobiles integrated via<br />

Sipgate SIM card)<br />

Switching/luxury functions<br />

Softphone Windows/Mac Å/Å Å/Å Å/Í Å/Í Å/Å Å/Å Å/Å<br />

Presence-/CTI functions<br />

Å/Å Å/Å Å/Å ( CTI via third-party provider) Å/Å Å/Å Å/Å Å (online)/Å<br />

(computer telephony)<br />

Call forwarding/answer phone per ext. Å/Å Å/Å Å/Å (Voicemail T-Mobile) Å/Å Å/Å Å/Å Å/Å<br />

Queue, boss/secretary Å/Å Å/Å Í/Å Å/Å Å/Å Å/Å Í/Í<br />

Company-wide address book Å Å Å Å Å Å Å<br />

Fax to PC, PC to fax Å / Å Å / Å optional/optional Í / Í Å/Å Å/Å Å/Å<br />

Conferencing<br />

Tel./web/video conferences Å/Í/Í optional/optional/Í Å/Å/Å Å/Å/Å Å /Í/Í Å/Í/Í Í/Í/Í<br />

Desktop sharing/file sharing Í/Í Í/Í Å/Å Å/Å Í/Í Í/Í Í/Í<br />

Special features<br />

Own softphone client with<br />

instant messaging and<br />

Outlook integration, call<br />

centre functions (ACD)<br />

Assistant Enterprise (dial<br />

from Outlook) TAPI 2.1,<br />

Receptionist (switching<br />

platform); Unified Communications<br />

(ESTOS Call Pro<br />

Enterprise)<br />

Valid April 2013; all prices are net (plus 19% VAT) 1 No own access offer, tested with Telekom DSL 16 000<br />

Subsidised phones as<br />

part of the package for a<br />

surcharge<br />

Indiv. flat rates up to international<br />

flat available per ext.;<br />

mobile phone integration without<br />

additional software, fixed<br />

network prices at com-pany<br />

locations; attendant console<br />

Automatic tel. config.; over<br />

150 system functions;<br />

(Pickup, IVR ...), voice<br />

encryption; integration<br />

MS Lync; integr. with O2<br />

(“Office Voice <strong>Cloud</strong>”)<br />

Discount system from ten<br />

extensions; IVR, conference<br />

rooms, waiting loops, etc.<br />

included free-of-charge<br />

Fixed line ext. no. recognition<br />

on outgoing mobile<br />

phone calls; transcripts of<br />

voice mails; SMS rec. also<br />

via web or landline; complete<br />

online management<br />

120 6/2013 121


connect Professional<br />

HOW CONNECT AND ZAFACO TEST<br />

Connect is again cooperating with<br />

the renowned fixed-network test<br />

Institute <strong>zafaco</strong>.<br />

From 18 March to 14 April 2013 (four<br />

weeks), <strong>zafaco</strong> set up around 50 000<br />

test connections with its equipment<br />

and put the network quality of our candidates<br />

under the microscope.<br />

In order to reproduce realistic<br />

conditions, the measurement setup<br />

used several sites, which simulated<br />

a headquarters in a city with<br />

several home offices distributed<br />

around Germany.<br />

To this end, <strong>zafaco</strong> used hardware installations<br />

in Düsseldorf, Kiel, Magdeburg,<br />

Munich and Nuremberg. Participants<br />

with their own network connections<br />

made this available in the test<br />

centre with the related hardware. For<br />

Sipgate, TeamFON and vio:networks,<br />

standard 16 000 DSL connections from<br />

the market leader Telecom were used.<br />

FritzBoxes of the type 7390 served for<br />

the network connection. In each of the<br />

cities Düsseldorf, Kiel, Magdeburg, Munich<br />

and Nuremberg an industrial PC<br />

set up the connections. By way of reference,<br />

<strong>zafaco</strong> also determined the qua-<br />

lity of connections via the conventional<br />

ISDN network. For this, several quad<br />

ISDN cards and the corresponding<br />

ISDN connections were used.<br />

The SIP connections were set up by<br />

PC softphones.<br />

Different connection types were<br />

taken into account for the measurements.<br />

Using the hardware constellation described,<br />

the experts set up several scenarios<br />

- calls from SIP to ISDN, from<br />

ISDN to SIP and from SIP-to-SIP - in<br />

practice therefore within the IP networks<br />

of the respective candidates.<br />

Here, how the IP connections behave<br />

under load played an important role. To<br />

simulate a realistic load on the internet<br />

lines, parallel to the telephone calls the<br />

test system carried out FTP uploads<br />

and HTTP downloads of large test files.<br />

The voice calls were carried out with<br />

the typical G.711 codec that does not<br />

use voice compression.<br />

The values measured are collected<br />

in the table below.<br />

The averages of the values collected<br />

per candidate in around 6000 individual<br />

connections were used as a basis for<br />

awarding points. However, the deviation<br />

from the average also flowed<br />

into the assessment. The idea behind<br />

this: big differences are more noticeable<br />

in everyday life than when dialling<br />

anyway takes a bit longer. If many<br />

connections took more than five<br />

seconds for a connection, this led to<br />

the deduction of points. This also applied<br />

to connections that broke off because<br />

of high error rates. To evaluate<br />

the speech intelligibility, <strong>zafaco</strong> determined<br />

the so-called PESQ value<br />

(Perceptual Evaluation of Speech Quality).<br />

This is an ITU-T standardised process<br />

for measuring the intelligibility of<br />

voice transmission. Values between 4.0<br />

and 4.5 stand for very good voice<br />

transmission, a value of 3.5 corresponds<br />

to a good mobile connection,<br />

and below 2.7 the intelligibility decreases.<br />

A further set of measurement values<br />

represents the language delay. If<br />

this exceeds 150 milliseconds, it starts<br />

to have a disturbing effect - as known<br />

from trans-Atlantic satellite links, especially<br />

as calls to the mobile network, to<br />

DECT phones or via Bluetooth headsets<br />

add further delays.<br />

Hardware in continuous operation: all<br />

systems tested were running day and<br />

night in Düsseldorf, Kiel, Magdeburg,<br />

Munich and Nuremberg and delivered<br />

approximately 50 000 test in four weeks.<br />

<strong>zafaco</strong> also took dual-tone multifrequencies<br />

(DTMF) and fax transmissions<br />

into account.<br />

DTMF tones are especially important<br />

for the operation of voice menus on<br />

hotlines and information services. And<br />

as Centrex lines are intended to replace<br />

the traditional telephone line, they<br />

should be able to cope with fax machines.<br />

For this we determined transmission<br />

times and error rates. If the fax<br />

was not transmitted after 180 seconds,<br />

the transmission was stopped.<br />

TELEFON-<br />

ANLAGE<br />

AUS DER<br />

CLOUD!<br />

Die Zukunft der Business-Kommunikation:<br />

endlos kostenlose Updates<br />

Über 5.000 zufriedene Unternehmen nutzen nfon, z.B.:<br />

MEASUREMENTS AND TEST RESULTS<br />

Provider teamFON QSC Telekom Vodafone nfon vio:networks sipgate<br />

ISDN<br />

reference<br />

MEASUREMENTS<br />

Number of test samples speech and DTMF 5066 5081 4575 5009 4946 5082 4786 4745<br />

Number of test samples fax 1173 1256 1208 1195 1256 1211 1234 1194<br />

CONNECT SETUP DURATION<br />

Connect Setup Duration 1,68 1,58 1,44 1,84 1,41 1,77 1,87 2,47<br />

Connect Setup Duration (standard deviation) s 1,61 1,72 0,99 1,57 1,32 1,58 1,48 0,69<br />

Connect Setup Duration > 5 sec % 1,13 1,51 0,18 3,95 1,14 1,15 1,54 0,34<br />

CALL FAILURE RATE<br />

Call Failure Ratio % 0,12 0,65 0,35 1,40 0,71 1,06 0,81 0<br />

VOICE QUALITY<br />

PESQ MOS 4,26 4,32 4,15 4,36 4,31 4,32 4,11 4,45<br />

PESQ MOS (standard deviation) 0,20 0,17 0,27 0,14 0,20 0,16 0,29 0,02<br />

PESQ MOS < 4 % 12,08 6,42 23,24 4,05 7,85 6,33 26,9 0<br />

SPEECH DELAY<br />

Speech delay ms 143,13 133,18 149,05 119,61 128,93 138,46 231,32 19,72<br />

Speech delay (standard deviation ms 33,33 22,43 41,40 18,60 23,04 18,96 62,41 2,34<br />

Speech delay > 150 ms % 39,11 25,56 36,37 12,98 25,69 36,39 89,22 0<br />

DTMF AND FAX<br />

DTMF Errors % 1,71 2,28 2,41 1,51 2,05 1,52 3,64 0<br />

Fax Setup Duration s 45,5 40,3 48,6 34,2 39,1 45,6 33,74 30,56<br />

Fax Transmission Duration s 94,3 86,0 79,0 80,0 94,0 94,3 94,0 81,8<br />

Fax Failure Ratio % 3,33 1,83 7,70 2,59 12,6 4,62 51,38 1,68<br />

TEST RESULTS<br />

Connect Setup Duration max. 40 30 26 40 14 34 30 28 36<br />

Call Failure Ratio max. 200 200 160 200 120 160 120 160 200<br />

Voice Quality max. 80 68 76 56 76 72 76 56 80<br />

Speech Delay max. 40 40 52 36 64 52 48 8 80<br />

DTMF transmission max. 40 32 24 24 32 24 32 16 40<br />

Fax transmission max. 60 40 52 30 52 12 32 14 60<br />

122 6/2013<br />

VERDICT(max. 500)<br />

410<br />

good<br />

390<br />

good<br />

386<br />

good<br />

358<br />

satisfactory<br />

354<br />

satisfactory<br />

338<br />

satisfactory<br />

282<br />

sufficient<br />

494<br />

very good<br />

CONCLUSION<br />

Hannes Rügheimer,<br />

connect specialist<br />

<strong>zafaco</strong> and connect last tested virtual<br />

phone systems in the issue 11/2011.<br />

Comparing the previous results with this<br />

year’s rankings reveals some surprises.<br />

The most impressive thing is the rise of<br />

the test winner TeamFON: from last place back then to first place now! And that’s<br />

although TeamFON still does not operate its own DSL network. With the combination of<br />

its own DSL network and its virtual telephone system, QSC achieved a good second<br />

place. The Cologne-based team was also well ahead in 2011. The offers from Telecom<br />

and Vodafone have slipped from pole position to midfield.<br />

With Telekom’s DeutschlandLAN it was above all deficiencies in voice quality in some<br />

of the connections that prevented a better result. The Vodafone product Officenet had<br />

a bit of bad luck: without the system error which occurred during the test period, the<br />

Düsseldorf-based company would probably have fared much better. nfon, vio:networks<br />

and, lagging slightly behind, Sipgate, also offer decent Centrex solutions, which, however,<br />

experienced difficulties in some situations. For these offers therefore is, techni cally<br />

speaking, still room for improvement.<br />

Erfolgreiches Geschäft beginnt mit nfon:<br />

ndless business communication<br />

08000-636624<br />

www.nfon.net/tk

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!