30.12.2014 Views

A-Textbook-of-Clinical-Pharmacology-and-Therapeutics-5th-edition

A-Textbook-of-Clinical-Pharmacology-and-Therapeutics-5th-edition

A-Textbook-of-Clinical-Pharmacology-and-Therapeutics-5th-edition

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

SLOW PROCESSES 9<br />

100<br />

2<br />

Dose ratio –1<br />

(a)<br />

50<br />

Slope 1/K B<br />

0<br />

10 9 510 9<br />

[Antagonist]→<br />

10 8<br />

Slope 1<br />

pA 2<br />

9 8 7<br />

log[Antagonist]→<br />

Figure 2.6: Competitive antagonism. (a) A plot <strong>of</strong> antagonist concentration vs. (dose ratio 1) gives a straight line through the origin.<br />

(b) A log–log plot (a Schildt plot) gives a straight line <strong>of</strong> unit slope. The potency <strong>of</strong> the antagonist (pA 2 ) is determined from the intercept<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Schildt plot.<br />

log (dose ratio) –1<br />

(b)<br />

1<br />

0<br />

The relationship between the concentration <strong>of</strong> a competitive<br />

antagonist [B], <strong>and</strong> the dose ratio (r) was worked out by<br />

Gaddum <strong>and</strong> by Schildt, <strong>and</strong> is:<br />

r 1 [B]/K B ,<br />

where K B is the dissociation equilibrium constant <strong>of</strong> the<br />

reversible reaction <strong>of</strong> the antagonist with its receptor. K B has<br />

units <strong>of</strong> concentration <strong>and</strong> is the concentration <strong>of</strong> antagonist<br />

needed to occupy half the receptors in the absence <strong>of</strong> agonist.<br />

The lower the value <strong>of</strong> K B , the more potent is the drug. If several<br />

concentrations <strong>of</strong> a competitive antagonist are studied<br />

<strong>and</strong> the dose ratio is measured at each concentration, a plot <strong>of</strong><br />

(r 1) against [B] yields a straight line through the origin with<br />

a slope <strong>of</strong> 1/K B (Figure 2.6a). Such measurements provided<br />

the means <strong>of</strong> classifying <strong>and</strong> subdividing receptors in terms <strong>of</strong><br />

the relative potencies <strong>of</strong> different antagonists.<br />

PARTIAL AGONISTS<br />

Some drugs combine with receptors <strong>and</strong> activate them, but are<br />

incapable <strong>of</strong> eliciting a maximal response, no matter how high<br />

their concentration may be. These are known as partial agonists,<br />

<strong>and</strong> are said to have low efficacy. Several partial agonists are<br />

used in therapeutics, including buprenorphine (a partial agonist<br />

at morphine μ-receptors, Chapter 25) <strong>and</strong> oxprenolol (partial<br />

agonist at β-adrenoceptors).<br />

Full agonists can elicit a maximal response when only a<br />

small proportion <strong>of</strong> the receptors is occupied (underlying the<br />

concept <strong>of</strong> ‘spare’ receptors), but this is not the case with partial<br />

agonists, where a substantial proportion <strong>of</strong> the receptors<br />

need to be occupied to cause a response. This has two clinical<br />

consequences. First, partial agonists antagonize the effect <strong>of</strong> a<br />

full agonist, because most <strong>of</strong> the receptors are occupied with<br />

low-efficacy partial agonist with which the full agonist must<br />

compete. Second, it is more difficult to reverse the effects <strong>of</strong> a<br />

partial agonist, such as buprenorphine, with a competitive<br />

antagonist such as naloxone, than it is to reverse the effects <strong>of</strong><br />

a full agonist such as morphine. A larger fraction <strong>of</strong> the receptors<br />

is occupied by buprenorphine than by morphine, <strong>and</strong> a<br />

much higher concentration <strong>of</strong> naloxone is required to compete<br />

successfully <strong>and</strong> displace buprenorphine from the receptors.<br />

SLOW PROCESSES<br />

Prolonged exposure <strong>of</strong> receptors to agonists, as frequently<br />

occurs in therapeutic use, can cause down-regulation or<br />

desensitization. Desensitization is sometimes specific for a<br />

particular agonist (when it is referred to as ‘homologous<br />

desensitization’), or there may be cross-desensitization to different<br />

agonists (‘heterologous desensitization’). Membrane<br />

receptors may become internalized. Alternatively, G-proteinmediated<br />

linkage between receptors <strong>and</strong> effector enzymes<br />

(e.g. adenylyl cyclase) may be disrupted. Since G-proteins link<br />

several distinct receptors to the same effector molecule, this<br />

can give rise to heterologous desensitization. Desensitization<br />

is probably involved in the tolerance that occurs during<br />

prolonged administration <strong>of</strong> drugs, such as morphine or<br />

benzodiazepines (see Chapters 18 <strong>and</strong> 25).<br />

Therapeutic effects sometimes depend on induction <strong>of</strong> tolerance.<br />

For example, analogues <strong>of</strong> gonadotrophin-releasing<br />

hormone (GnRH), such as goserelin or buserelin, are used to<br />

treat patients with metastatic prostate cancer (Chapter 48).<br />

Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone is released physiologically<br />

in a pulsatile manner. During continuous treatment with<br />

buserelin, there is initial stimulation <strong>of</strong> luteinizing hormone<br />

(LH) <strong>and</strong> follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) release, followed<br />

by receptor desensitization <strong>and</strong> suppression <strong>of</strong> LH <strong>and</strong> FSH<br />

release. This results in regression <strong>of</strong> the hormone-sensitive<br />

tumour.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!