31.12.2014 Views

20140927_NIU_CJ7_TREX_SFA guide 3.1

20140927_NIU_CJ7_TREX_SFA guide 3.1

20140927_NIU_CJ7_TREX_SFA guide 3.1

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

UNCLASS//FGI ISAF NATO //REL to USA, ISAF, NATO//FOUO<br />

This document is not approved for public release<br />

CHAPTER 2<br />

Resolute Support (RS) Functionally Based <strong>SFA</strong> (FB<strong>SFA</strong>)<br />

Our <strong>SFA</strong> effort is designed to identify the critical paths, the critical<br />

processes, and critical nodes. We will work those to connect the ministry to<br />

the lowest tactical level.<br />

—General Joseph Dunford, COMISAF, December 2013<br />

Chapter 2<br />

2.14 Introduction. ISAF/RS has developed a <strong>SFA</strong> framework that shifts the emphasis<br />

from unit-based, combat advising to functionally based advising. The new<br />

functional framework is designed to facilitate a coordinated (Afghan and Coalition)<br />

problem solving effort and the development of sustainable relationships. FB<strong>SFA</strong> is<br />

about maturing the processes that will provide the Afghan forces enduring sustainability.<br />

2.15 The Advisor Network (ANET) and Technical Control (TECHCON). The<br />

advisor network utilizes a communication structure defined as TECHCON. TECH-<br />

CON is defined as the provision of specialist and technical advice by designated<br />

authorities for the management and operation of forces to influence Afghan systems.<br />

If the Afghans are unable to solve a particular problem, advisors can seek assistance<br />

from any other advisors along the functional process—from the lowest tactical level<br />

up to the ministry. This TECHCON communication network is not a chain of command;<br />

rather it is a pathway to vertically integrate Afghan systems. Advisors have<br />

access to process maps and a comprehensive advisor network tool that will aid them<br />

in understanding how the Afghan processes are designed to work, who and where<br />

their co-advisors are and to facilitate communication. (See Annex B Process Maps).<br />

2.16 Afghan Sustainability. The Chicago Summit held in May 2012 delineated that<br />

the end-state of FB<strong>SFA</strong> is to achieve Afghan sustainability, defined as:<br />

In 2016, provided with Chicago resources and limited advisory support, Afghan Security<br />

Institutions and Afghan National Security Forces can execute and integrate the<br />

eight essential functions in order to provide stability and security in Afghanistan and<br />

serve as an effective Counter-Terrorism partner.<br />

2.17 Integrating ministerial, institutional (national), and fielded force advisors is<br />

central to the Functionally Based framework. Advisors are focused on headquarters<br />

(HQ) coordination and sustainability functions to provide ANSF the ability to<br />

effectively employ and sustain tactical forces. Linking these ANSF functions to the<br />

responsible agencies and elements within the security ministries is critical to achieving<br />

the level of security required to sustain growth and governmental development.<br />

This is accomplished using the eight Essential Functions outlined below.<br />

2.18 The Eight Essential Functions. The eight EFs provide the framework and<br />

desired outcomes in target areas to achieve Afghan sustainability. Each EF contains<br />

a series of Afghan processes with tactical, operational, and strategic characteristics,<br />

many of which have interactions across other EFs. This multi-echelon level of<br />

advising and cross-functional coordination allows analysis of Afghan process issues<br />

through multiple lenses. The eight EFs are:<br />

UNCLASS//FGI ISAF NATO //REL to USA, ISAF, NATO//FOUO<br />

11

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!