03.01.2015 Views

Geologic Map of the Maysville Quadrangle, Chaffee County, Colorado

Geologic Map of the Maysville Quadrangle, Chaffee County, Colorado

Geologic Map of the Maysville Quadrangle, Chaffee County, Colorado

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Patented Lode Mining Claims – There are two groups <strong>of</strong> patented lode mining claims in<br />

<strong>the</strong> <strong>Maysville</strong> quadrangle. The oldest patented claim includes <strong>the</strong> Copper King claim<br />

(Mineral Survey 1165) which was patented by Monarch Mining Co in December 1880<br />

and is located southwest <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Maysville</strong> town site, in NW 1 / 4 , Section 3, T49N, R7E.<br />

This claim still has an open shaft (+40 feet) with a moderate-sized waste dump, with<br />

abundant Cu-oxide stained quartz-magnetite veins in hornblende intermediate gneiss.<br />

The largest patent group includes <strong>the</strong> Alaska group located at 13,400 to 14,000<br />

feet elevation just south <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> summit <strong>of</strong> Mount Shavano (Sections 6 and 7, T50N, R7E).<br />

The Alaska group includes eleven claims that were patented (Mineral Surveys 15899 and<br />

15901) in November 1904 by <strong>the</strong> Mt. Shavano Mining and Milling Company. Crawford<br />

(1913) mentioned that a tunnel (adit on west side <strong>of</strong> ridge) was being driven around 1910<br />

and that a shipment from <strong>the</strong> surface workings ran about $40.00 gold per ton. Minor Cuoxides<br />

and quartz veins are associated with garnet-epidote calc-silicate hosted in<br />

amphibolite gneiss. On <strong>the</strong> basis <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> visible ground disturbance that can be seen today,<br />

<strong>the</strong>re does not appear to have been any significant work on <strong>the</strong>se patented claims after<br />

about 1910. Information from <strong>the</strong> Bureau <strong>of</strong> Land Management LR2000 Data Base<br />

indicates that <strong>the</strong>re have not been any unpatented lode mining claims in this area since<br />

<strong>the</strong> mid-1960’s.<br />

Unpatented Lode Mining Claims – Most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> larger mines in <strong>the</strong> <strong>Maysville</strong><br />

quadrangle are associated with unpatented lode mining claims on federal lands that predate<br />

<strong>the</strong> Bureau <strong>of</strong> Land Management claim record data base. An historical review <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

old unpatented mining claims requires a detailed analysis <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Chaffee</strong> <strong>County</strong><br />

courthouse records that was beyond <strong>the</strong> scope <strong>of</strong> this study. However, descriptions by<br />

Crawford (1913, plate 1 and pages 279-281) indicate that many <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> mines were active<br />

around 1910 and that <strong>the</strong> bulk <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> mining activity was in progress at that time.<br />

Practically all <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> significant mines that were identified during this study are shown on<br />

Crawford’s (1913) map. Notable exceptions include <strong>the</strong> Blank mine (SE 1 / 4 , Section 8,<br />

T50N, R7E) and mines on <strong>the</strong> ridge between upper Willow Creek and Como Creek<br />

(SE 1 / 4 , Section 12, T49N, R6E).<br />

186

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!