04.01.2015 Views

Relativity Problem Sheet.pdf - Of the Clux

Relativity Problem Sheet.pdf - Of the Clux

Relativity Problem Sheet.pdf - Of the Clux

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Transform your PDFs into Flipbooks and boost your revenue!

Leverage SEO-optimized Flipbooks, powerful backlinks, and multimedia content to professionally showcase your products and significantly increase your reach.

University of Warwick<br />

Department of Physics<br />

<strong>Relativity</strong> – PX 109<br />

WEEK 1<br />

1. By considering <strong>the</strong> length of a rod in two reference frames S and S′ (where S′ is<br />

moving with speed v in <strong>the</strong> x-direction with respect to S) show explicitly that under a<br />

Galilean transformation length does not change. Let <strong>the</strong> co-ordinates of <strong>the</strong> ends of<br />

<strong>the</strong> rod be x<br />

A<br />

and x<br />

B<br />

in frames S in which <strong>the</strong> rod is at rest. (Note that a meaningful<br />

measurement of length requires <strong>the</strong> measurement of <strong>the</strong> co-ordinates of each end of<br />

<strong>the</strong> rod at <strong>the</strong> same instant in time).<br />

2. To demonstrate <strong>the</strong> Galilean invariance of a conservation law consider <strong>the</strong> following:<br />

* A particle of mass m 1 = 3 kg, moving at a velocity of u 1 = +4 ms -1 along <strong>the</strong> x-axis of<br />

an inertial frame S, approaches a second particle of mass, m 2 = l kg, moving at u 1 = 3<br />

ms -1 along this axis. After a head-on collision, it is found that m 2 has a velocity U 2 = +<br />

3 ms -1 along <strong>the</strong> x-axis.<br />

i) Using <strong>the</strong> conservation of linear momentum calculate <strong>the</strong> velocity, U 1 of m l after<br />

<strong>the</strong> collision.<br />

ii) The collision is seen by an observer in ano<strong>the</strong>r inertial frame S which moves with<br />

a (uniform) speed of + 2m/s relative to S along <strong>the</strong> x-direction (<strong>the</strong> standard<br />

configuration).<br />

(a) Calculate <strong>the</strong> velocities u l ', u 2 ', U l ' and U 2 relative to S.<br />

(b) Calculate <strong>the</strong> initial and final values of <strong>the</strong> total linear momentum (p i and p f )<br />

relative to S.<br />

(c) Hence show that <strong>the</strong> total linear momentum is conserved in S (as it is in S)<br />

[<strong>the</strong> conservation of linear momentum is a Galilean invariant law] while <strong>the</strong><br />

initial and final values of total linear momentum in S are different from <strong>the</strong><br />

values in S.<br />

3 (a) Consider two frames of reference S and S' in standard configuration with S'<br />

moving at 10 miles per hour relative to S in <strong>the</strong> direction of <strong>the</strong> +ve x-axis. At 10.00<br />

am an explosion occurs at a point in space whose coordinates in S' are x' = 4 miles, y'<br />

= 1 mile, z' = 2 miles. Given that <strong>the</strong> origins of S and S' were coincident at 9.00 am,<br />

find <strong>the</strong> coordinates of <strong>the</strong> explosion in <strong>the</strong> frame S, assuming Galilean relativity.<br />

(b) In a frame of reference S two events occur simultaneously at two different<br />

points which are separated by 310 8 m. Using Special <strong>Relativity</strong> find (as a fraction of<br />

<strong>the</strong> speed of light c = 310 8 ms -l ) <strong>the</strong> velocities of <strong>the</strong> inertial frames S' (in standard<br />

configuration relative to S) in which <strong>the</strong> two events are separated by (i) 0.1 s, (ii) 1 s,<br />

and (iii) 10 s.<br />

1<br />

Mark Newton 2003


SOLUTION<br />

(i).<br />

y<br />

y'<br />

10 miles per hour<br />

z<br />

o<br />

z '<br />

0'<br />

4 miles<br />

Explosion at 10am<br />

[1]<br />

x<br />

x'<br />

The standard Galilean transformation is:<br />

x xvt<br />

y y<br />

z z<br />

t t<br />

<strong>the</strong> absolute time<br />

- <strong>the</strong> same in S and S<br />

We have been given <strong>the</strong> information with respect to S′ but we require it with respect to S.<br />

[The frames are coincident at 9am hence at 10 am 00′ = 10 miles]<br />

Invert <strong>the</strong> equation<br />

x<br />

x<br />

vt<br />

y y, z z,<br />

t t<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

x 4 10 1 14 miles<br />

y= 1 mile, z<br />

2 miles<br />

14,1, 2 are <strong>the</strong> co-ordinates in S<br />

(ii)<br />

According to Special <strong>Relativity</strong>, <strong>the</strong> time intervals measured by different inertial<br />

observers no longer agree (as <strong>the</strong>y did in Galilean <strong>Relativity</strong>).<br />

If t is <strong>the</strong> time inertial frame S and<br />

t<br />

that in frame S′ <strong>the</strong>n<br />

2<br />

Mark Newton 2003


Lorentz transformation gives<br />

t<br />

<br />

v<br />

t<br />

x<br />

2<br />

c<br />

2 2<br />

1 v / c<br />

We are told that <strong>the</strong> two events occur simultaneously (<strong>the</strong>refore<br />

t<br />

0<br />

) and at a<br />

separation<br />

x<br />

<br />

8<br />

310 m<br />

Hence,<br />

vx<br />

<br />

c c v/<br />

c<br />

t<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

1 v / c 1 v / c<br />

2 2 2 2<br />

Rearranging gives<br />

Hence <strong>the</strong> velocities<br />

v/<br />

c<br />

are:<br />

v/<br />

c<br />

t<br />

t 2<br />

1 <br />

(i) 0.099 for t = 0.1s<br />

(ii) 0.707 for t = 1s<br />

(iii) 0.995 for t = 10s<br />

4. (a) The factor<br />

2<br />

1 enters into <strong>the</strong> relativistic expression for length contraction and<br />

1 1<br />

<br />

2<br />

occurs in <strong>the</strong> expression for relativistic time dilation. To gain some experience<br />

in <strong>the</strong> magnitude of <strong>the</strong>se two factors as a function of<br />

<br />

v<br />

c calculate <strong>the</strong>ir values for<br />

<br />

0.100,0.300, 0.600, 0.800, 0.900, 0.950<br />

and 0.990 , and plot your results as a<br />

function of .<br />

(b) Up to what value of are <strong>the</strong> binomial expansions of <strong>the</strong>se<br />

2<br />

1<br />

<br />

and<br />

1 1<br />

<br />

2<br />

acceptable approximations<br />

3<br />

Mark Newton 2003


WEEK 2<br />

5. Using <strong>the</strong> Lorentz transformation for space and time co-ordinates, verify, explicitly<br />

<strong>the</strong> (Lorentz) covariance of <strong>the</strong> following equation:<br />

2 2 2 2 2<br />

x y z c t 0<br />

[Hint: Write this equation in terms of x, y, z and t and substituting from <strong>the</strong> Lorentz<br />

transformations show that <strong>the</strong> resulting equation is of <strong>the</strong> same form as <strong>the</strong> one above]<br />

6. The space and time coordinates of two events as measured in a frame S are as follows:<br />

Event 1: x<br />

1<br />

x0, t1<br />

x0<br />

/ c,<br />

y1<br />

0, z1<br />

0<br />

Event 2: x x , t x / 2c,<br />

y<br />

0, z 0<br />

2<br />

2<br />

0 2 0<br />

2 2<br />

<br />

Show that <strong>the</strong>re exists an inertial frame in which <strong>the</strong>se events occur at <strong>the</strong> same time,<br />

and find <strong>the</strong> velocity of this frame relative to S. At what value of time in <strong>the</strong> new<br />

frame do both events occur<br />

[Answer: 1 2 ,<br />

x 0<br />

t 3 ]<br />

c<br />

7. Show that two successive Lorentz transformations with velocities v 1 and v 2 in <strong>the</strong><br />

same direction are equivalent to a single Lorentz transformation with velocity<br />

2<br />

v v1 v2<br />

1 v1<br />

v2<br />

c .<br />

SOLUTION<br />

We need to make two successive transformations, so for <strong>the</strong> first frame<br />

x<br />

2<br />

<br />

x<br />

v1t<br />

<br />

v<br />

<br />

1x<br />

t<br />

v1x<br />

c <br />

x v t <br />

t t<br />

<br />

1<br />

2<br />

1<br />

1 v c<br />

and <strong>the</strong> second frame<br />

x<br />

2<br />

<br />

c<br />

2<br />

<br />

2<br />

1<br />

1 v c<br />

<br />

x<br />

v2t<br />

x<br />

v t<br />

<br />

<br />

2<br />

v2x<br />

t<br />

v2x<br />

c <br />

t t<br />

<br />

2<br />

2<br />

2<br />

1<br />

v c<br />

The two transformations toge<strong>the</strong>r give<br />

2<br />

<br />

c<br />

2<br />

<br />

2<br />

2<br />

2<br />

1<br />

v c<br />

2<br />

4<br />

Mark Newton 2003


x <br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

x<br />

v t<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

2<br />

<br />

2<br />

x<br />

v t t<br />

v x c <br />

1<br />

v<br />

2<br />

1<br />

1<br />

c<br />

2<br />

v<br />

1<br />

v<br />

2<br />

2<br />

2<br />

c<br />

2<br />

1<br />

1<br />

v<br />

2<br />

1<br />

c<br />

2<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

x<br />

2<br />

1<br />

v v c <br />

tv<br />

v <br />

1<br />

2 1<br />

2<br />

v1<br />

c<br />

2<br />

1<br />

v<br />

1<br />

2<br />

2<br />

c<br />

2<br />

2<br />

x <br />

<br />

2<br />

<br />

x<br />

v t<br />

<br />

<br />

2<br />

<br />

2<br />

x t v1<br />

v2<br />

1<br />

v1<br />

v2<br />

c <br />

2 2 2 2<br />

2<br />

1<br />

v c 1<br />

v c 1<br />

v v c <br />

1<br />

2<br />

2<br />

x t v1<br />

v2<br />

1<br />

v1<br />

v2<br />

c <br />

2 2 2 2<br />

2<br />

1<br />

v c 1<br />

v c 1<br />

v v c <br />

1<br />

2<br />

1<br />

x x<br />

v t<br />

<br />

[The top is in <strong>the</strong> correct form]<br />

1<br />

2<br />

2<br />

Look carefully at denominator<br />

2 2 2 2<br />

2 2 2 2<br />

2<br />

1<br />

v <br />

2<br />

1 2<br />

2<br />

1 c 1<br />

v<br />

1<br />

1<br />

1 1<br />

2 c<br />

v c v c v v c <br />

1<br />

v 2<br />

1<br />

v2<br />

c<br />

2 2 2 2<br />

1<br />

( v1<br />

c v2<br />

c ) <br />

<br />

2<br />

1<br />

v v c 2<br />

Look for <strong>the</strong> trick!<br />

<br />

<br />

1<br />

v<br />

2<br />

1<br />

v<br />

2<br />

2<br />

4<br />

1<br />

2<br />

c 2v<br />

v<br />

1<br />

2<br />

v<br />

c<br />

2 2<br />

1<br />

v2<br />

2<br />

c<br />

( v<br />

4<br />

<br />

2<br />

1<br />

v v c 2<br />

1<br />

2<br />

1<br />

2<br />

c<br />

2<br />

v<br />

2<br />

2<br />

2<br />

c ) 2v<br />

v<br />

1<br />

2<br />

c<br />

2<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

1<br />

v1<br />

v<br />

<br />

<br />

2<br />

c<br />

2<br />

<br />

2<br />

1<br />

v v c 2<br />

1<br />

2<br />

v<br />

<br />

<br />

2<br />

1<br />

v<br />

c<br />

2<br />

2<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

1 2<br />

1 <br />

v v<br />

<br />

1<br />

v1<br />

v2<br />

c<br />

2<br />

<br />

<br />

c<br />

<br />

2<br />

So now we find that<br />

2<br />

v<br />

v 1<br />

v v c <br />

x t<br />

x <br />

1 2<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

v1<br />

v2<br />

1 <br />

1<br />

v1<br />

v2<br />

c<br />

2<br />

1<br />

<br />

2<br />

<br />

c<br />

<br />

2<br />

<br />

<br />

x vt<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

1 v c<br />

2<br />

<br />

<br />

x vt<br />

2<br />

where v v<br />

v v v <br />

1 2<br />

1<br />

1 2<br />

c<br />

which is of <strong>the</strong> form required. Thus two successive Lorentz transformations do indeed yield<br />

<strong>the</strong> same as one using <strong>the</strong> transformation of velocity formula.<br />

5<br />

Mark Newton 2003


8. The following table shows <strong>the</strong> time of flight (over 10 m) for electrons that had<br />

*<br />

previously been accelerated through a potential to give <strong>the</strong>m <strong>the</strong> specified kinetic<br />

energy (KE). The KE is specified in units of MeV.<br />

[1MeV = 10 6 eV and 1 eV = 1.60210 -19 J]<br />

KE<br />

(MeV)<br />

Time of Flight<br />

over 10 m<br />

(S)<br />

0.0051 0.237<br />

0.051 0.080<br />

0.255 0.045<br />

2.55 0.034<br />

5.1 0.033<br />

25.5 0.033<br />

Velocity v<br />

(ms -1 )<br />

v 2<br />

(m 2 s -2 )<br />

v<br />

2KE(<br />

J<br />

<br />

m<br />

2 )<br />

0e<br />

v<br />

2<br />

c<br />

2<br />

KE(<br />

MeV ) <br />

1<br />

1<br />

<br />

<br />

0.51 <br />

2<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

(a) Using <strong>the</strong> data provided calculate <strong>the</strong> values of v and v 2 .<br />

(b) Plot <strong>the</strong> value of v 2 (m 2 s -2 ) against <strong>the</strong> KE (MeV) on a log 10 vs log 10 scale.<br />

Velocity Squared (m^2s^-2)<br />

1.0E+19<br />

1.0E+18<br />

1.0E+17<br />

1.0E+16<br />

1.0E+15<br />

0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100<br />

Energy (MeV)<br />

(c)<br />

(d)<br />

2<br />

In Newtonian mechanics ( )<br />

m 0e<br />

KE J <br />

v where m 0e = 9.109410 -31 kg. Use this<br />

2<br />

expression to calculate a value for v 2 (remembering to convert <strong>the</strong> KE into <strong>the</strong><br />

correct units) and plot this on <strong>the</strong> same graph as used in part (b). Why does<br />

Newtonian <strong>the</strong>ory not agree with <strong>the</strong> experimental data over <strong>the</strong> whole range of<br />

energies<br />

The relativistic expression for <strong>the</strong> kinetic energy of an electron travelling at<br />

velocity v is <br />

0.5<br />

KE ( MeV ) 0.51 1<br />

v 1<br />

<br />

<br />

2 c 2 . Re-arrange this expression and<br />

<br />

show that <strong>the</strong> calculated values of v 2 agree with experiment.<br />

6<br />

Mark Newton 2003


WEEK 3<br />

9. Proxima Centauri, <strong>the</strong> star nearest our own, is some 4.2 light-years away. (a) If a<br />

spaceship could travel at a speed of 0.80c, how long would it take to reach <strong>the</strong> star,<br />

according to <strong>the</strong> spaceship’s pilot (b) What would someone in <strong>the</strong> frame that moves<br />

with <strong>the</strong> spaceship measure as <strong>the</strong> distance to Proxima Centauri<br />

[Ans: (a) 3.1 yr, (b) 2.5 ly]<br />

SOLUTION<br />

Proxima Centauri, <strong>the</strong> star nearest our own, is some 4.2 ly away. (a)<br />

v ship<br />

0. 8c<br />

, hence<br />

1.67 and 0. 8 . In <strong>the</strong> spaceship frame, from <strong>the</strong> Lorentz transformations we have, with<br />

origin of space and time in both frames at <strong>the</strong> departure point of <strong>the</strong> spaceship,<br />

<br />

xEarth<br />

<br />

tship 1 .67<br />

tEarth<br />

0. 8 <br />

<br />

c <br />

and<br />

t<br />

Earth<br />

4.2<br />

0.8 5.25 years<br />

hence<br />

t<br />

Earth<br />

5.25<br />

0.8<br />

4.2 3. 15<br />

1.67<br />

<br />

years<br />

or from <strong>the</strong> invariance of <strong>the</strong> interval,<br />

giving<br />

Ship<br />

2 2 2<br />

5.25<br />

4.2 tShip<br />

t 3.15 yrs as before.<br />

(b) Here we need simply to multiply<br />

[Ans: (a) 3.15 yrs, (b) 2.5 ly]<br />

t Ship<br />

by <strong>the</strong> velocity of <strong>the</strong> ship (0.8c) to give 2.52 ly.<br />

10. Rigel is 900 light years from Earth. (a) What is <strong>the</strong> minimum Earth time a spacecraft<br />

could take to make a return trip to Rigel (b) How fast should <strong>the</strong> spacecraft travel to<br />

complete <strong>the</strong> journey in just 30 astronaut years (c) What is <strong>the</strong> distance from Earth to<br />

Rigel measured by astronauts on <strong>the</strong>ir 30 year round trip<br />

11. Our galaxy is 10 5 light years across. How long does it take to cross <strong>the</strong> galaxy in a<br />

spacecraft travelling at 0.995c<br />

12. A new Klingon battleship races at a top speed of 0.2c away from <strong>the</strong> planet XG4C.<br />

The star ship Enterprise follows at a speed of 0.25c relative to <strong>the</strong> Klingon ship. With<br />

what speed does <strong>the</strong> Enterprise appear to catch up with <strong>the</strong> Klingon “wessel”,<br />

according to Mr. Chekov on <strong>the</strong> planet [Ans: 0.23c]<br />

13. A new Borg battleship has a proper length of 217 m and travels at a speed of 0.20c<br />

with respect to planet XG12 (away from <strong>the</strong> planet). The Borg prepare to battle <strong>the</strong><br />

Enterprise, which is moving at <strong>the</strong> same speed with respect to <strong>the</strong> same planet<br />

(towards <strong>the</strong> planet). If <strong>the</strong> Borg are heading straight at <strong>the</strong> Enterprise, what is <strong>the</strong><br />

length of <strong>the</strong> Borg ship as measured by Captain Jean Luke Pickard<br />

7<br />

Mark Newton 2003


[Ans: 200 m]<br />

14. The proper mean lifetime of <br />

*<br />

+ mesons is 26 ns.<br />

(a) What is <strong>the</strong> mean lifetime of a burst of + mesons travelling with = v/c = 0.73<br />

(b) What distance is travelled at this velocity during one mean lifetime<br />

(c) What distance would be travelled without <strong>the</strong> effect of time dilation<br />

[Ans: (a) 38 ns, (b) 8.32 m, (c) 5.69 m.]<br />

15. A burst of muons is produced by a cosmic ray interacting in <strong>the</strong> outer reaches of <strong>the</strong><br />

upper atmosphere. They travel towards <strong>the</strong> Earth’s surface with an average speed of<br />

0.99c. If 1% of <strong>the</strong> burst survives to reach ground level, estimate <strong>the</strong> height of <strong>the</strong><br />

burst and calculate <strong>the</strong> distance as measured in <strong>the</strong> muon’s frame. The muon mean<br />

lifetime is 2.2 sec.<br />

[Ans: 2.1310 4 m, 3.0110 3 m.]<br />

SOLUTON<br />

The muon mean (rest) lifetime is 2.2 sec. The average speed of <strong>the</strong> muons in <strong>the</strong> Earth<br />

frame is 0.99c. Only 1% reach <strong>the</strong> ground, so if Earth is <strong>the</strong> apparent lifetime in <strong>the</strong> earth<br />

frame, <strong>the</strong>n<br />

I I 0 exp t Earth<br />

or I 1 <br />

ln <br />

ln<br />

t<br />

<br />

Earth<br />

I<br />

0 100<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

1<br />

v<br />

1<br />

c<br />

2<br />

2<br />

<br />

1<br />

1<br />

0.99<br />

2<br />

7.09<br />

<br />

6<br />

5<br />

Earth<br />

<br />

Rest<br />

7.09 2.2 10<br />

1.56 10<br />

s<br />

So in <strong>the</strong> Earth’s frame<br />

<br />

ln<br />

<br />

1<br />

100<br />

<br />

4.61<br />

t<br />

<br />

t 4.611.56<br />

10<br />

5<br />

1.56 10<br />

7.19 10<br />

8<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

d 0.99<br />

2.99810<br />

7.19 10<br />

2.1310<br />

s<br />

4<br />

m<br />

and using <strong>the</strong> Lorentz contraction we have in <strong>the</strong> muon’s rest frame<br />

d<br />

<br />

d<br />

<br />

2.1310<br />

<br />

7.09<br />

4<br />

3.0110<br />

3<br />

m<br />

[Ans: 2.1310 4 m, 3.01103 m.]<br />

8<br />

Mark Newton 2003


16. A beam of particles travelling at 99% <strong>the</strong> speed of light passes through two detectors<br />

60 m apart. The number of particles per second recorded passing <strong>the</strong> second detector<br />

is only one quarter of <strong>the</strong> number of particles per second recorded passing <strong>the</strong> first.<br />

What is <strong>the</strong> half-life of <strong>the</strong> particle in its rest frame<br />

WEEK 4<br />

17. An absorption line in <strong>the</strong> hydrogen spectrum from a distant galaxy are red-shifted<br />

from =394 nm to =500 nm. Assuming that this is due to <strong>the</strong> recession of <strong>the</strong><br />

galaxy calculate its velocity relative to <strong>the</strong> Earth.<br />

SOLUTION<br />

Using <strong>the</strong> relativistic Doppler formula (where =v/c):<br />

<br />

<br />

0<br />

1<br />

<br />

<br />

1<br />

<br />

0.5<br />

500<br />

1.27<br />

394<br />

1 .61<br />

1<br />

<br />

<br />

1<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

1 .611.61 1 <br />

2.61 0.61<br />

v<br />

c<br />

<br />

0.61<br />

0.234<br />

2.61<br />

So <strong>the</strong> galaxy is moving away from <strong>the</strong> Earth at a velocity v = 0.234c<br />

18. By 2025 a spaceship shuttle service operates between <strong>the</strong> Earth and Mars. Each<br />

spaceship is equipped with identical monochromatic head and taillights, and <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

cruising speed v relative to earth, is such that <strong>the</strong> headlight of a homeward-bound<br />

spaceship appears green ( = 500 nm) and <strong>the</strong> taillight of a departing spaceship<br />

appears red ( = 600 nm).<br />

(i) What is v/c<br />

(ii) What is <strong>the</strong> wavelength of <strong>the</strong> headlight of an earth-bound spaceship is observed<br />

from an outward-bound one<br />

[Ans: (i) 1/11, (ii) 457 nm.]<br />

9<br />

Mark Newton 2003


19. A driver was caught running a red light. His defence is that he saw <strong>the</strong> light as green,<br />

as a result of <strong>the</strong> Doppler shift. He is arrested. What for Estimate <strong>the</strong> seriousness of<br />

his transgression if he is fined £1 for each m.p.h. above <strong>the</strong> speed limit of 70 m.p.h.<br />

You may assume red light is 620 nm, and green light 530 nm.<br />

20. Fresnel suggested that <strong>the</strong> movement of material bodies through <strong>the</strong> E<strong>the</strong>r might drag<br />

<strong>the</strong> e<strong>the</strong>r along with it and affect <strong>the</strong> speed of light relative to an external laboratory.<br />

In 1861 Fizeau tested this idea and found that <strong>the</strong> speed of light in water relative to <strong>the</strong><br />

laboratory was affected by <strong>the</strong> velocity of flow of <strong>the</strong> water. If <strong>the</strong> e<strong>the</strong>r is dragged<br />

along at <strong>the</strong> velocity of <strong>the</strong> medium <strong>the</strong> velocity of light relative to <strong>the</strong> laboratory<br />

would have this flow velocity v (Galilean Transformation), added to it so that <strong>the</strong><br />

velocity relative to <strong>the</strong> laboratory is about:<br />

c L<br />

c<br />

v where n is <strong>the</strong> refractive index of <strong>the</strong> medium.<br />

n<br />

In 1886 Michelson and Morley carried out an accurate measurement of this effect and<br />

found that <strong>the</strong> velocity relative to <strong>the</strong> laboratory is about:<br />

c L<br />

c<br />

0 . 453<br />

v<br />

n<br />

Show that this result is consistent with relativity and does not need <strong>the</strong> e<strong>the</strong>r<br />

hypo<strong>the</strong>sis.<br />

SOLUTION<br />

If <strong>the</strong> flow of water is parallel to <strong>the</strong> direction of <strong>the</strong> light beam <strong>the</strong> velocity c L relative to <strong>the</strong><br />

laboratory is found from <strong>the</strong> relativistic addition of <strong>the</strong> flow velocity v and velocity of light<br />

relative to <strong>the</strong> medium c<br />

c n<br />

ux<br />

v c<br />

v c n v v <br />

ux<br />

cL<br />

<br />

1<br />

2<br />

c n v <br />

1 vu<br />

c vc<br />

vc<br />

1 1 <br />

nc<br />

x<br />

<br />

2<br />

2<br />

c nc<br />

v<br />

Since 1 we can expand <strong>the</strong> second term using <strong>the</strong> binomial expansion<br />

nc<br />

<br />

2<br />

<br />

<br />

v v <br />

<br />

v<br />

c L<br />

c n v 1 c n v <br />

<br />

<br />

2<br />

<br />

nc nc n<br />

1<br />

2<br />

v<br />

since 0<br />

nc<br />

so<br />

c 1 c 1 c 1 c<br />

c L v 1<br />

v 1<br />

v 1 0. 435v<br />

n<br />

2 <br />

n n<br />

2 <br />

n n<br />

2<br />

<br />

1.33 n<br />

c<br />

c L<br />

0. 435v<br />

n<br />

So relativity saves <strong>the</strong> day yet again!<br />

10<br />

Mark Newton 2003


21. (a) An electron has a kinetic energy of 2.53 MeV; calculate<br />

*<br />

(i) its total relativistic energy, E.<br />

(ii) <strong>the</strong> magnitude, p, of its relativistic linear momentum in units of MeV/c.<br />

(iii)its relativistic mass m(u)<br />

2<br />

[ m 0 c for <strong>the</strong> electron is 0.511 MeV]<br />

(b)<br />

A proton is accelerated to 1.08 TeV in <strong>the</strong> Fermilab accelerator; calculate<br />

(i) its speed as a fraction of c.<br />

(ii) how much slower than c is this high-energy proton moving.<br />

2<br />

[ m 0 c for <strong>the</strong> proton is 983.3 MeV]<br />

22. The Galaxy is about 10 5 light years across and <strong>the</strong> most energetic cosmic rays known<br />

have energies of <strong>the</strong> order of 10 19 eV. How long would it take a proton with this<br />

energy to cross <strong>the</strong> Galaxy as measured in <strong>the</strong> rest frame of (i) <strong>the</strong> Galaxy and (ii) <strong>the</strong><br />

proton The rest-mass of <strong>the</strong> proton is 938 MeV/c 2 .<br />

[Ans: (i) 10 5 years, (ii) 4.96 min.]<br />

23. (a) What is <strong>the</strong> ratio of total mass to rest mass for a 500 GeV proton (i.e. a proton that<br />

has been accelerated through a potential difference of 500 GV). The rest mass of a<br />

proton is 1.6710 -27 kg.<br />

SOLUTION<br />

(b) What is <strong>the</strong> velocity of a particle whose total mass is double its rest mass<br />

(c) What is <strong>the</strong> rest mass, total mass, energy and momentum of an electron accelerated<br />

through 1.5 MV (Rest mass of an electron is 9.110 -31 kg)<br />

(a) 500 GeV is <strong>the</strong> kinetic energy of <strong>the</strong> proton, T. The total energy is <strong>the</strong> sum of <strong>the</strong> kinetic<br />

energy and rest energy.<br />

KE m<br />

<br />

2<br />

0c<br />

<br />

1<br />

Total Energy E m<br />

2<br />

0<br />

m0c<br />

<br />

<br />

2<br />

0c<br />

KE E0<br />

2 2 0.<br />

5<br />

E 1<br />

v c <br />

E<br />

<br />

<br />

10<br />

2<br />

27<br />

16<br />

10<br />

0<br />

m0c<br />

1.627 10<br />

9 10<br />

1.510<br />

eV <br />

19<br />

E 500 0.94 500.94 GeV<br />

1.510<br />

J <br />

1.602 10<br />

0.94 GeV<br />

11<br />

Mark Newton 2003


E 500.94<br />

Note 533 . This corresponds to a proton velocity of about 0.999998c. The<br />

E0<br />

0.94<br />

KE in this case is so large that <strong>the</strong> rest mass energy makes a negligible contribution to <strong>the</strong><br />

total energy.<br />

(b)<br />

m<br />

m 0<br />

2m 0<br />

so<br />

2 0.5<br />

1<br />

v c 2<br />

2<br />

<br />

<br />

2 2<br />

2 2<br />

3<br />

1 4 1 v c v c 3 4 v c<br />

2<br />

(c)<br />

14<br />

2<br />

31<br />

16<br />

14<br />

8.19 10<br />

E<br />

0<br />

m0c<br />

9.110<br />

9 10<br />

8.19 10<br />

J <br />

eV <br />

19<br />

1.602 10<br />

0.51 MeV<br />

Kinetic Energy KE = 1.5 MeV<br />

Total Energy<br />

E 1.5<br />

0.51 <br />

2.01MeV<br />

2<br />

E m0c<br />

mc<br />

E<br />

Total Mass 01<br />

2<br />

c<br />

2. MeV/c 2<br />

E<br />

2<br />

2<br />

2 2 2<br />

E<br />

E0<br />

<br />

E0<br />

p c so momentum p <br />

1. 9 MeV/c<br />

c<br />

2<br />

2<br />

0.5<br />

12<br />

Mark Newton 2003


WEEK 5<br />

24. Inertial frame S is moving at a speed 0.6c in <strong>the</strong> x (x parallel to x) direction with<br />

*<br />

respect to inertial frame S. At time t = t = 0, x = x = 0.<br />

(a) Draw <strong>the</strong> Minkowski space-time diagram for S and S showing <strong>the</strong> x- and ct-axes,<br />

as well as <strong>the</strong> x- and ct-axes. The x-axis should span <strong>the</strong> range from 0 to 5 m, and<br />

<strong>the</strong> ct-axis should span <strong>the</strong> range from 0 to 5 m. Remember everywhere on <strong>the</strong> xaxis<br />

ct = 0 and likewise on <strong>the</strong> ct-axis x=0<br />

x <br />

vx <br />

x<br />

vt t t<br />

<br />

2<br />

<br />

c <br />

<br />

<br />

1<br />

1 v<br />

2<br />

c<br />

2<br />

2<br />

2<br />

(b) Using <strong>the</strong> relations x ( ct)<br />

1calibrate <strong>the</strong> x- and ct-axes.<br />

(c) Indicate <strong>the</strong> events x = 2.5 m, ct = 1.5 m, and x = 4 m, ct = 4 m on <strong>the</strong> diagram.<br />

(d) What are <strong>the</strong> co-ordinates of <strong>the</strong> above events in <strong>the</strong> S frame<br />

(e) Hence use <strong>the</strong> diagram to demonstrate that “moving clocks run slow”.<br />

25. Two rockets A and B depart from Earth at steady speeds of 0.6c in opposite<br />

directions, having synchronised clocks with each o<strong>the</strong>r and with Earth at departure.<br />

After one year measured in <strong>the</strong> Earths reference frame, rocket B emits a light signal.<br />

At what times, in <strong>the</strong> reference frames of rockets A and B, does rocket A receive <strong>the</strong><br />

signal [Hint: It is very helpful to draw <strong>the</strong> Space-time diagram(s)!]<br />

13<br />

Mark Newton 2003

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!