Relativity Problem Sheet.pdf - Of the Clux
Relativity Problem Sheet.pdf - Of the Clux
Relativity Problem Sheet.pdf - Of the Clux
Transform your PDFs into Flipbooks and boost your revenue!
Leverage SEO-optimized Flipbooks, powerful backlinks, and multimedia content to professionally showcase your products and significantly increase your reach.
University of Warwick<br />
Department of Physics<br />
<strong>Relativity</strong> – PX 109<br />
WEEK 1<br />
1. By considering <strong>the</strong> length of a rod in two reference frames S and S′ (where S′ is<br />
moving with speed v in <strong>the</strong> x-direction with respect to S) show explicitly that under a<br />
Galilean transformation length does not change. Let <strong>the</strong> co-ordinates of <strong>the</strong> ends of<br />
<strong>the</strong> rod be x<br />
A<br />
and x<br />
B<br />
in frames S in which <strong>the</strong> rod is at rest. (Note that a meaningful<br />
measurement of length requires <strong>the</strong> measurement of <strong>the</strong> co-ordinates of each end of<br />
<strong>the</strong> rod at <strong>the</strong> same instant in time).<br />
2. To demonstrate <strong>the</strong> Galilean invariance of a conservation law consider <strong>the</strong> following:<br />
* A particle of mass m 1 = 3 kg, moving at a velocity of u 1 = +4 ms -1 along <strong>the</strong> x-axis of<br />
an inertial frame S, approaches a second particle of mass, m 2 = l kg, moving at u 1 = 3<br />
ms -1 along this axis. After a head-on collision, it is found that m 2 has a velocity U 2 = +<br />
3 ms -1 along <strong>the</strong> x-axis.<br />
i) Using <strong>the</strong> conservation of linear momentum calculate <strong>the</strong> velocity, U 1 of m l after<br />
<strong>the</strong> collision.<br />
ii) The collision is seen by an observer in ano<strong>the</strong>r inertial frame S which moves with<br />
a (uniform) speed of + 2m/s relative to S along <strong>the</strong> x-direction (<strong>the</strong> standard<br />
configuration).<br />
(a) Calculate <strong>the</strong> velocities u l ', u 2 ', U l ' and U 2 relative to S.<br />
(b) Calculate <strong>the</strong> initial and final values of <strong>the</strong> total linear momentum (p i and p f )<br />
relative to S.<br />
(c) Hence show that <strong>the</strong> total linear momentum is conserved in S (as it is in S)<br />
[<strong>the</strong> conservation of linear momentum is a Galilean invariant law] while <strong>the</strong><br />
initial and final values of total linear momentum in S are different from <strong>the</strong><br />
values in S.<br />
3 (a) Consider two frames of reference S and S' in standard configuration with S'<br />
moving at 10 miles per hour relative to S in <strong>the</strong> direction of <strong>the</strong> +ve x-axis. At 10.00<br />
am an explosion occurs at a point in space whose coordinates in S' are x' = 4 miles, y'<br />
= 1 mile, z' = 2 miles. Given that <strong>the</strong> origins of S and S' were coincident at 9.00 am,<br />
find <strong>the</strong> coordinates of <strong>the</strong> explosion in <strong>the</strong> frame S, assuming Galilean relativity.<br />
(b) In a frame of reference S two events occur simultaneously at two different<br />
points which are separated by 310 8 m. Using Special <strong>Relativity</strong> find (as a fraction of<br />
<strong>the</strong> speed of light c = 310 8 ms -l ) <strong>the</strong> velocities of <strong>the</strong> inertial frames S' (in standard<br />
configuration relative to S) in which <strong>the</strong> two events are separated by (i) 0.1 s, (ii) 1 s,<br />
and (iii) 10 s.<br />
1<br />
Mark Newton 2003
SOLUTION<br />
(i).<br />
y<br />
y'<br />
10 miles per hour<br />
z<br />
o<br />
z '<br />
0'<br />
4 miles<br />
Explosion at 10am<br />
[1]<br />
x<br />
x'<br />
The standard Galilean transformation is:<br />
x xvt<br />
y y<br />
z z<br />
t t<br />
<strong>the</strong> absolute time<br />
- <strong>the</strong> same in S and S<br />
We have been given <strong>the</strong> information with respect to S′ but we require it with respect to S.<br />
[The frames are coincident at 9am hence at 10 am 00′ = 10 miles]<br />
Invert <strong>the</strong> equation<br />
x<br />
x<br />
vt<br />
y y, z z,<br />
t t<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
x 4 10 1 14 miles<br />
y= 1 mile, z<br />
2 miles<br />
14,1, 2 are <strong>the</strong> co-ordinates in S<br />
(ii)<br />
According to Special <strong>Relativity</strong>, <strong>the</strong> time intervals measured by different inertial<br />
observers no longer agree (as <strong>the</strong>y did in Galilean <strong>Relativity</strong>).<br />
If t is <strong>the</strong> time inertial frame S and<br />
t<br />
that in frame S′ <strong>the</strong>n<br />
2<br />
Mark Newton 2003
Lorentz transformation gives<br />
t<br />
<br />
v<br />
t<br />
x<br />
2<br />
c<br />
2 2<br />
1 v / c<br />
We are told that <strong>the</strong> two events occur simultaneously (<strong>the</strong>refore<br />
t<br />
0<br />
) and at a<br />
separation<br />
x<br />
<br />
8<br />
310 m<br />
Hence,<br />
vx<br />
<br />
c c v/<br />
c<br />
t<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
1 v / c 1 v / c<br />
2 2 2 2<br />
Rearranging gives<br />
Hence <strong>the</strong> velocities<br />
v/<br />
c<br />
are:<br />
v/<br />
c<br />
t<br />
t 2<br />
1 <br />
(i) 0.099 for t = 0.1s<br />
(ii) 0.707 for t = 1s<br />
(iii) 0.995 for t = 10s<br />
4. (a) The factor<br />
2<br />
1 enters into <strong>the</strong> relativistic expression for length contraction and<br />
1 1<br />
<br />
2<br />
occurs in <strong>the</strong> expression for relativistic time dilation. To gain some experience<br />
in <strong>the</strong> magnitude of <strong>the</strong>se two factors as a function of<br />
<br />
v<br />
c calculate <strong>the</strong>ir values for<br />
<br />
0.100,0.300, 0.600, 0.800, 0.900, 0.950<br />
and 0.990 , and plot your results as a<br />
function of .<br />
(b) Up to what value of are <strong>the</strong> binomial expansions of <strong>the</strong>se<br />
2<br />
1<br />
<br />
and<br />
1 1<br />
<br />
2<br />
acceptable approximations<br />
3<br />
Mark Newton 2003
WEEK 2<br />
5. Using <strong>the</strong> Lorentz transformation for space and time co-ordinates, verify, explicitly<br />
<strong>the</strong> (Lorentz) covariance of <strong>the</strong> following equation:<br />
2 2 2 2 2<br />
x y z c t 0<br />
[Hint: Write this equation in terms of x, y, z and t and substituting from <strong>the</strong> Lorentz<br />
transformations show that <strong>the</strong> resulting equation is of <strong>the</strong> same form as <strong>the</strong> one above]<br />
6. The space and time coordinates of two events as measured in a frame S are as follows:<br />
Event 1: x<br />
1<br />
x0, t1<br />
x0<br />
/ c,<br />
y1<br />
0, z1<br />
0<br />
Event 2: x x , t x / 2c,<br />
y<br />
0, z 0<br />
2<br />
2<br />
0 2 0<br />
2 2<br />
<br />
Show that <strong>the</strong>re exists an inertial frame in which <strong>the</strong>se events occur at <strong>the</strong> same time,<br />
and find <strong>the</strong> velocity of this frame relative to S. At what value of time in <strong>the</strong> new<br />
frame do both events occur<br />
[Answer: 1 2 ,<br />
x 0<br />
t 3 ]<br />
c<br />
7. Show that two successive Lorentz transformations with velocities v 1 and v 2 in <strong>the</strong><br />
same direction are equivalent to a single Lorentz transformation with velocity<br />
2<br />
v v1 v2<br />
1 v1<br />
v2<br />
c .<br />
SOLUTION<br />
We need to make two successive transformations, so for <strong>the</strong> first frame<br />
x<br />
2<br />
<br />
x<br />
v1t<br />
<br />
v<br />
<br />
1x<br />
t<br />
v1x<br />
c <br />
x v t <br />
t t<br />
<br />
1<br />
2<br />
1<br />
1 v c<br />
and <strong>the</strong> second frame<br />
x<br />
2<br />
<br />
c<br />
2<br />
<br />
2<br />
1<br />
1 v c<br />
<br />
x<br />
v2t<br />
x<br />
v t<br />
<br />
<br />
2<br />
v2x<br />
t<br />
v2x<br />
c <br />
t t<br />
<br />
2<br />
2<br />
2<br />
1<br />
v c<br />
The two transformations toge<strong>the</strong>r give<br />
2<br />
<br />
c<br />
2<br />
<br />
2<br />
2<br />
2<br />
1<br />
v c<br />
2<br />
4<br />
Mark Newton 2003
x <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
x<br />
v t<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
2<br />
<br />
2<br />
x<br />
v t t<br />
v x c <br />
1<br />
v<br />
2<br />
1<br />
1<br />
c<br />
2<br />
v<br />
1<br />
v<br />
2<br />
2<br />
2<br />
c<br />
2<br />
1<br />
1<br />
v<br />
2<br />
1<br />
c<br />
2<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
x<br />
2<br />
1<br />
v v c <br />
tv<br />
v <br />
1<br />
2 1<br />
2<br />
v1<br />
c<br />
2<br />
1<br />
v<br />
1<br />
2<br />
2<br />
c<br />
2<br />
2<br />
x <br />
<br />
2<br />
<br />
x<br />
v t<br />
<br />
<br />
2<br />
<br />
2<br />
x t v1<br />
v2<br />
1<br />
v1<br />
v2<br />
c <br />
2 2 2 2<br />
2<br />
1<br />
v c 1<br />
v c 1<br />
v v c <br />
1<br />
2<br />
2<br />
x t v1<br />
v2<br />
1<br />
v1<br />
v2<br />
c <br />
2 2 2 2<br />
2<br />
1<br />
v c 1<br />
v c 1<br />
v v c <br />
1<br />
2<br />
1<br />
x x<br />
v t<br />
<br />
[The top is in <strong>the</strong> correct form]<br />
1<br />
2<br />
2<br />
Look carefully at denominator<br />
2 2 2 2<br />
2 2 2 2<br />
2<br />
1<br />
v <br />
2<br />
1 2<br />
2<br />
1 c 1<br />
v<br />
1<br />
1<br />
1 1<br />
2 c<br />
v c v c v v c <br />
1<br />
v 2<br />
1<br />
v2<br />
c<br />
2 2 2 2<br />
1<br />
( v1<br />
c v2<br />
c ) <br />
<br />
2<br />
1<br />
v v c 2<br />
Look for <strong>the</strong> trick!<br />
<br />
<br />
1<br />
v<br />
2<br />
1<br />
v<br />
2<br />
2<br />
4<br />
1<br />
2<br />
c 2v<br />
v<br />
1<br />
2<br />
v<br />
c<br />
2 2<br />
1<br />
v2<br />
2<br />
c<br />
( v<br />
4<br />
<br />
2<br />
1<br />
v v c 2<br />
1<br />
2<br />
1<br />
2<br />
c<br />
2<br />
v<br />
2<br />
2<br />
2<br />
c ) 2v<br />
v<br />
1<br />
2<br />
c<br />
2<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
1<br />
v1<br />
v<br />
<br />
<br />
2<br />
c<br />
2<br />
<br />
2<br />
1<br />
v v c 2<br />
1<br />
2<br />
v<br />
<br />
<br />
2<br />
1<br />
v<br />
c<br />
2<br />
2<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
1 2<br />
1 <br />
v v<br />
<br />
1<br />
v1<br />
v2<br />
c<br />
2<br />
<br />
<br />
c<br />
<br />
2<br />
So now we find that<br />
2<br />
v<br />
v 1<br />
v v c <br />
x t<br />
x <br />
1 2<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
v1<br />
v2<br />
1 <br />
1<br />
v1<br />
v2<br />
c<br />
2<br />
1<br />
<br />
2<br />
<br />
c<br />
<br />
2<br />
<br />
<br />
x vt<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
1 v c<br />
2<br />
<br />
<br />
x vt<br />
2<br />
where v v<br />
v v v <br />
1 2<br />
1<br />
1 2<br />
c<br />
which is of <strong>the</strong> form required. Thus two successive Lorentz transformations do indeed yield<br />
<strong>the</strong> same as one using <strong>the</strong> transformation of velocity formula.<br />
5<br />
Mark Newton 2003
8. The following table shows <strong>the</strong> time of flight (over 10 m) for electrons that had<br />
*<br />
previously been accelerated through a potential to give <strong>the</strong>m <strong>the</strong> specified kinetic<br />
energy (KE). The KE is specified in units of MeV.<br />
[1MeV = 10 6 eV and 1 eV = 1.60210 -19 J]<br />
KE<br />
(MeV)<br />
Time of Flight<br />
over 10 m<br />
(S)<br />
0.0051 0.237<br />
0.051 0.080<br />
0.255 0.045<br />
2.55 0.034<br />
5.1 0.033<br />
25.5 0.033<br />
Velocity v<br />
(ms -1 )<br />
v 2<br />
(m 2 s -2 )<br />
v<br />
2KE(<br />
J<br />
<br />
m<br />
2 )<br />
0e<br />
v<br />
2<br />
c<br />
2<br />
KE(<br />
MeV ) <br />
1<br />
1<br />
<br />
<br />
0.51 <br />
2<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
(a) Using <strong>the</strong> data provided calculate <strong>the</strong> values of v and v 2 .<br />
(b) Plot <strong>the</strong> value of v 2 (m 2 s -2 ) against <strong>the</strong> KE (MeV) on a log 10 vs log 10 scale.<br />
Velocity Squared (m^2s^-2)<br />
1.0E+19<br />
1.0E+18<br />
1.0E+17<br />
1.0E+16<br />
1.0E+15<br />
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100<br />
Energy (MeV)<br />
(c)<br />
(d)<br />
2<br />
In Newtonian mechanics ( )<br />
m 0e<br />
KE J <br />
v where m 0e = 9.109410 -31 kg. Use this<br />
2<br />
expression to calculate a value for v 2 (remembering to convert <strong>the</strong> KE into <strong>the</strong><br />
correct units) and plot this on <strong>the</strong> same graph as used in part (b). Why does<br />
Newtonian <strong>the</strong>ory not agree with <strong>the</strong> experimental data over <strong>the</strong> whole range of<br />
energies<br />
The relativistic expression for <strong>the</strong> kinetic energy of an electron travelling at<br />
velocity v is <br />
0.5<br />
KE ( MeV ) 0.51 1<br />
v 1<br />
<br />
<br />
2 c 2 . Re-arrange this expression and<br />
<br />
show that <strong>the</strong> calculated values of v 2 agree with experiment.<br />
6<br />
Mark Newton 2003
WEEK 3<br />
9. Proxima Centauri, <strong>the</strong> star nearest our own, is some 4.2 light-years away. (a) If a<br />
spaceship could travel at a speed of 0.80c, how long would it take to reach <strong>the</strong> star,<br />
according to <strong>the</strong> spaceship’s pilot (b) What would someone in <strong>the</strong> frame that moves<br />
with <strong>the</strong> spaceship measure as <strong>the</strong> distance to Proxima Centauri<br />
[Ans: (a) 3.1 yr, (b) 2.5 ly]<br />
SOLUTION<br />
Proxima Centauri, <strong>the</strong> star nearest our own, is some 4.2 ly away. (a)<br />
v ship<br />
0. 8c<br />
, hence<br />
1.67 and 0. 8 . In <strong>the</strong> spaceship frame, from <strong>the</strong> Lorentz transformations we have, with<br />
origin of space and time in both frames at <strong>the</strong> departure point of <strong>the</strong> spaceship,<br />
<br />
xEarth<br />
<br />
tship 1 .67<br />
tEarth<br />
0. 8 <br />
<br />
c <br />
and<br />
t<br />
Earth<br />
4.2<br />
0.8 5.25 years<br />
hence<br />
t<br />
Earth<br />
5.25<br />
0.8<br />
4.2 3. 15<br />
1.67<br />
<br />
years<br />
or from <strong>the</strong> invariance of <strong>the</strong> interval,<br />
giving<br />
Ship<br />
2 2 2<br />
5.25<br />
4.2 tShip<br />
t 3.15 yrs as before.<br />
(b) Here we need simply to multiply<br />
[Ans: (a) 3.15 yrs, (b) 2.5 ly]<br />
t Ship<br />
by <strong>the</strong> velocity of <strong>the</strong> ship (0.8c) to give 2.52 ly.<br />
10. Rigel is 900 light years from Earth. (a) What is <strong>the</strong> minimum Earth time a spacecraft<br />
could take to make a return trip to Rigel (b) How fast should <strong>the</strong> spacecraft travel to<br />
complete <strong>the</strong> journey in just 30 astronaut years (c) What is <strong>the</strong> distance from Earth to<br />
Rigel measured by astronauts on <strong>the</strong>ir 30 year round trip<br />
11. Our galaxy is 10 5 light years across. How long does it take to cross <strong>the</strong> galaxy in a<br />
spacecraft travelling at 0.995c<br />
12. A new Klingon battleship races at a top speed of 0.2c away from <strong>the</strong> planet XG4C.<br />
The star ship Enterprise follows at a speed of 0.25c relative to <strong>the</strong> Klingon ship. With<br />
what speed does <strong>the</strong> Enterprise appear to catch up with <strong>the</strong> Klingon “wessel”,<br />
according to Mr. Chekov on <strong>the</strong> planet [Ans: 0.23c]<br />
13. A new Borg battleship has a proper length of 217 m and travels at a speed of 0.20c<br />
with respect to planet XG12 (away from <strong>the</strong> planet). The Borg prepare to battle <strong>the</strong><br />
Enterprise, which is moving at <strong>the</strong> same speed with respect to <strong>the</strong> same planet<br />
(towards <strong>the</strong> planet). If <strong>the</strong> Borg are heading straight at <strong>the</strong> Enterprise, what is <strong>the</strong><br />
length of <strong>the</strong> Borg ship as measured by Captain Jean Luke Pickard<br />
7<br />
Mark Newton 2003
[Ans: 200 m]<br />
14. The proper mean lifetime of <br />
*<br />
+ mesons is 26 ns.<br />
(a) What is <strong>the</strong> mean lifetime of a burst of + mesons travelling with = v/c = 0.73<br />
(b) What distance is travelled at this velocity during one mean lifetime<br />
(c) What distance would be travelled without <strong>the</strong> effect of time dilation<br />
[Ans: (a) 38 ns, (b) 8.32 m, (c) 5.69 m.]<br />
15. A burst of muons is produced by a cosmic ray interacting in <strong>the</strong> outer reaches of <strong>the</strong><br />
upper atmosphere. They travel towards <strong>the</strong> Earth’s surface with an average speed of<br />
0.99c. If 1% of <strong>the</strong> burst survives to reach ground level, estimate <strong>the</strong> height of <strong>the</strong><br />
burst and calculate <strong>the</strong> distance as measured in <strong>the</strong> muon’s frame. The muon mean<br />
lifetime is 2.2 sec.<br />
[Ans: 2.1310 4 m, 3.0110 3 m.]<br />
SOLUTON<br />
The muon mean (rest) lifetime is 2.2 sec. The average speed of <strong>the</strong> muons in <strong>the</strong> Earth<br />
frame is 0.99c. Only 1% reach <strong>the</strong> ground, so if Earth is <strong>the</strong> apparent lifetime in <strong>the</strong> earth<br />
frame, <strong>the</strong>n<br />
I I 0 exp t Earth<br />
or I 1 <br />
ln <br />
ln<br />
t<br />
<br />
Earth<br />
I<br />
0 100<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
1<br />
v<br />
1<br />
c<br />
2<br />
2<br />
<br />
1<br />
1<br />
0.99<br />
2<br />
7.09<br />
<br />
6<br />
5<br />
Earth<br />
<br />
Rest<br />
7.09 2.2 10<br />
1.56 10<br />
s<br />
So in <strong>the</strong> Earth’s frame<br />
<br />
ln<br />
<br />
1<br />
100<br />
<br />
4.61<br />
t<br />
<br />
t 4.611.56<br />
10<br />
5<br />
1.56 10<br />
7.19 10<br />
8<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
d 0.99<br />
2.99810<br />
7.19 10<br />
2.1310<br />
s<br />
4<br />
m<br />
and using <strong>the</strong> Lorentz contraction we have in <strong>the</strong> muon’s rest frame<br />
d<br />
<br />
d<br />
<br />
2.1310<br />
<br />
7.09<br />
4<br />
3.0110<br />
3<br />
m<br />
[Ans: 2.1310 4 m, 3.01103 m.]<br />
8<br />
Mark Newton 2003
16. A beam of particles travelling at 99% <strong>the</strong> speed of light passes through two detectors<br />
60 m apart. The number of particles per second recorded passing <strong>the</strong> second detector<br />
is only one quarter of <strong>the</strong> number of particles per second recorded passing <strong>the</strong> first.<br />
What is <strong>the</strong> half-life of <strong>the</strong> particle in its rest frame<br />
WEEK 4<br />
17. An absorption line in <strong>the</strong> hydrogen spectrum from a distant galaxy are red-shifted<br />
from =394 nm to =500 nm. Assuming that this is due to <strong>the</strong> recession of <strong>the</strong><br />
galaxy calculate its velocity relative to <strong>the</strong> Earth.<br />
SOLUTION<br />
Using <strong>the</strong> relativistic Doppler formula (where =v/c):<br />
<br />
<br />
0<br />
1<br />
<br />
<br />
1<br />
<br />
0.5<br />
500<br />
1.27<br />
394<br />
1 .61<br />
1<br />
<br />
<br />
1<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
1 .611.61 1 <br />
2.61 0.61<br />
v<br />
c<br />
<br />
0.61<br />
0.234<br />
2.61<br />
So <strong>the</strong> galaxy is moving away from <strong>the</strong> Earth at a velocity v = 0.234c<br />
18. By 2025 a spaceship shuttle service operates between <strong>the</strong> Earth and Mars. Each<br />
spaceship is equipped with identical monochromatic head and taillights, and <strong>the</strong>ir<br />
cruising speed v relative to earth, is such that <strong>the</strong> headlight of a homeward-bound<br />
spaceship appears green ( = 500 nm) and <strong>the</strong> taillight of a departing spaceship<br />
appears red ( = 600 nm).<br />
(i) What is v/c<br />
(ii) What is <strong>the</strong> wavelength of <strong>the</strong> headlight of an earth-bound spaceship is observed<br />
from an outward-bound one<br />
[Ans: (i) 1/11, (ii) 457 nm.]<br />
9<br />
Mark Newton 2003
19. A driver was caught running a red light. His defence is that he saw <strong>the</strong> light as green,<br />
as a result of <strong>the</strong> Doppler shift. He is arrested. What for Estimate <strong>the</strong> seriousness of<br />
his transgression if he is fined £1 for each m.p.h. above <strong>the</strong> speed limit of 70 m.p.h.<br />
You may assume red light is 620 nm, and green light 530 nm.<br />
20. Fresnel suggested that <strong>the</strong> movement of material bodies through <strong>the</strong> E<strong>the</strong>r might drag<br />
<strong>the</strong> e<strong>the</strong>r along with it and affect <strong>the</strong> speed of light relative to an external laboratory.<br />
In 1861 Fizeau tested this idea and found that <strong>the</strong> speed of light in water relative to <strong>the</strong><br />
laboratory was affected by <strong>the</strong> velocity of flow of <strong>the</strong> water. If <strong>the</strong> e<strong>the</strong>r is dragged<br />
along at <strong>the</strong> velocity of <strong>the</strong> medium <strong>the</strong> velocity of light relative to <strong>the</strong> laboratory<br />
would have this flow velocity v (Galilean Transformation), added to it so that <strong>the</strong><br />
velocity relative to <strong>the</strong> laboratory is about:<br />
c L<br />
c<br />
v where n is <strong>the</strong> refractive index of <strong>the</strong> medium.<br />
n<br />
In 1886 Michelson and Morley carried out an accurate measurement of this effect and<br />
found that <strong>the</strong> velocity relative to <strong>the</strong> laboratory is about:<br />
c L<br />
c<br />
0 . 453<br />
v<br />
n<br />
Show that this result is consistent with relativity and does not need <strong>the</strong> e<strong>the</strong>r<br />
hypo<strong>the</strong>sis.<br />
SOLUTION<br />
If <strong>the</strong> flow of water is parallel to <strong>the</strong> direction of <strong>the</strong> light beam <strong>the</strong> velocity c L relative to <strong>the</strong><br />
laboratory is found from <strong>the</strong> relativistic addition of <strong>the</strong> flow velocity v and velocity of light<br />
relative to <strong>the</strong> medium c<br />
c n<br />
ux<br />
v c<br />
v c n v v <br />
ux<br />
cL<br />
<br />
1<br />
2<br />
c n v <br />
1 vu<br />
c vc<br />
vc<br />
1 1 <br />
nc<br />
x<br />
<br />
2<br />
2<br />
c nc<br />
v<br />
Since 1 we can expand <strong>the</strong> second term using <strong>the</strong> binomial expansion<br />
nc<br />
<br />
2<br />
<br />
<br />
v v <br />
<br />
v<br />
c L<br />
c n v 1 c n v <br />
<br />
<br />
2<br />
<br />
nc nc n<br />
1<br />
2<br />
v<br />
since 0<br />
nc<br />
so<br />
c 1 c 1 c 1 c<br />
c L v 1<br />
v 1<br />
v 1 0. 435v<br />
n<br />
2 <br />
n n<br />
2 <br />
n n<br />
2<br />
<br />
1.33 n<br />
c<br />
c L<br />
0. 435v<br />
n<br />
So relativity saves <strong>the</strong> day yet again!<br />
10<br />
Mark Newton 2003
21. (a) An electron has a kinetic energy of 2.53 MeV; calculate<br />
*<br />
(i) its total relativistic energy, E.<br />
(ii) <strong>the</strong> magnitude, p, of its relativistic linear momentum in units of MeV/c.<br />
(iii)its relativistic mass m(u)<br />
2<br />
[ m 0 c for <strong>the</strong> electron is 0.511 MeV]<br />
(b)<br />
A proton is accelerated to 1.08 TeV in <strong>the</strong> Fermilab accelerator; calculate<br />
(i) its speed as a fraction of c.<br />
(ii) how much slower than c is this high-energy proton moving.<br />
2<br />
[ m 0 c for <strong>the</strong> proton is 983.3 MeV]<br />
22. The Galaxy is about 10 5 light years across and <strong>the</strong> most energetic cosmic rays known<br />
have energies of <strong>the</strong> order of 10 19 eV. How long would it take a proton with this<br />
energy to cross <strong>the</strong> Galaxy as measured in <strong>the</strong> rest frame of (i) <strong>the</strong> Galaxy and (ii) <strong>the</strong><br />
proton The rest-mass of <strong>the</strong> proton is 938 MeV/c 2 .<br />
[Ans: (i) 10 5 years, (ii) 4.96 min.]<br />
23. (a) What is <strong>the</strong> ratio of total mass to rest mass for a 500 GeV proton (i.e. a proton that<br />
has been accelerated through a potential difference of 500 GV). The rest mass of a<br />
proton is 1.6710 -27 kg.<br />
SOLUTION<br />
(b) What is <strong>the</strong> velocity of a particle whose total mass is double its rest mass<br />
(c) What is <strong>the</strong> rest mass, total mass, energy and momentum of an electron accelerated<br />
through 1.5 MV (Rest mass of an electron is 9.110 -31 kg)<br />
(a) 500 GeV is <strong>the</strong> kinetic energy of <strong>the</strong> proton, T. The total energy is <strong>the</strong> sum of <strong>the</strong> kinetic<br />
energy and rest energy.<br />
KE m<br />
<br />
2<br />
0c<br />
<br />
1<br />
Total Energy E m<br />
2<br />
0<br />
m0c<br />
<br />
<br />
2<br />
0c<br />
KE E0<br />
2 2 0.<br />
5<br />
E 1<br />
v c <br />
E<br />
<br />
<br />
10<br />
2<br />
27<br />
16<br />
10<br />
0<br />
m0c<br />
1.627 10<br />
9 10<br />
1.510<br />
eV <br />
19<br />
E 500 0.94 500.94 GeV<br />
1.510<br />
J <br />
1.602 10<br />
0.94 GeV<br />
11<br />
Mark Newton 2003
E 500.94<br />
Note 533 . This corresponds to a proton velocity of about 0.999998c. The<br />
E0<br />
0.94<br />
KE in this case is so large that <strong>the</strong> rest mass energy makes a negligible contribution to <strong>the</strong><br />
total energy.<br />
(b)<br />
m<br />
m 0<br />
2m 0<br />
so<br />
2 0.5<br />
1<br />
v c 2<br />
2<br />
<br />
<br />
2 2<br />
2 2<br />
3<br />
1 4 1 v c v c 3 4 v c<br />
2<br />
(c)<br />
14<br />
2<br />
31<br />
16<br />
14<br />
8.19 10<br />
E<br />
0<br />
m0c<br />
9.110<br />
9 10<br />
8.19 10<br />
J <br />
eV <br />
19<br />
1.602 10<br />
0.51 MeV<br />
Kinetic Energy KE = 1.5 MeV<br />
Total Energy<br />
E 1.5<br />
0.51 <br />
2.01MeV<br />
2<br />
E m0c<br />
mc<br />
E<br />
Total Mass 01<br />
2<br />
c<br />
2. MeV/c 2<br />
E<br />
2<br />
2<br />
2 2 2<br />
E<br />
E0<br />
<br />
E0<br />
p c so momentum p <br />
1. 9 MeV/c<br />
c<br />
2<br />
2<br />
0.5<br />
12<br />
Mark Newton 2003
WEEK 5<br />
24. Inertial frame S is moving at a speed 0.6c in <strong>the</strong> x (x parallel to x) direction with<br />
*<br />
respect to inertial frame S. At time t = t = 0, x = x = 0.<br />
(a) Draw <strong>the</strong> Minkowski space-time diagram for S and S showing <strong>the</strong> x- and ct-axes,<br />
as well as <strong>the</strong> x- and ct-axes. The x-axis should span <strong>the</strong> range from 0 to 5 m, and<br />
<strong>the</strong> ct-axis should span <strong>the</strong> range from 0 to 5 m. Remember everywhere on <strong>the</strong> xaxis<br />
ct = 0 and likewise on <strong>the</strong> ct-axis x=0<br />
x <br />
vx <br />
x<br />
vt t t<br />
<br />
2<br />
<br />
c <br />
<br />
<br />
1<br />
1 v<br />
2<br />
c<br />
2<br />
2<br />
2<br />
(b) Using <strong>the</strong> relations x ( ct)<br />
1calibrate <strong>the</strong> x- and ct-axes.<br />
(c) Indicate <strong>the</strong> events x = 2.5 m, ct = 1.5 m, and x = 4 m, ct = 4 m on <strong>the</strong> diagram.<br />
(d) What are <strong>the</strong> co-ordinates of <strong>the</strong> above events in <strong>the</strong> S frame<br />
(e) Hence use <strong>the</strong> diagram to demonstrate that “moving clocks run slow”.<br />
25. Two rockets A and B depart from Earth at steady speeds of 0.6c in opposite<br />
directions, having synchronised clocks with each o<strong>the</strong>r and with Earth at departure.<br />
After one year measured in <strong>the</strong> Earths reference frame, rocket B emits a light signal.<br />
At what times, in <strong>the</strong> reference frames of rockets A and B, does rocket A receive <strong>the</strong><br />
signal [Hint: It is very helpful to draw <strong>the</strong> Space-time diagram(s)!]<br />
13<br />
Mark Newton 2003