05.01.2015 Views

Metropolitan Arrangements - Philippine Institute for Development ...

Metropolitan Arrangements - Philippine Institute for Development ...

Metropolitan Arrangements - Philippine Institute for Development ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

22 ManagingUrbanizationUnder a DecentralizedGovernanceFramework<br />

significant relationship between D2 and PCHE. However, our results<br />

do not suggest that the presence of province-operated or DOHoperated<br />

hospitals within city premises leads to a reduction in per<br />

capita health expenditures of the host cities.<br />

The coefficients <strong>for</strong> PCIRA have the expected signs but are not<br />

significant in 1994 and 1995. Moreover, while the coefficients of the<br />

DI*PCIRA variable are negative in the PCHE regressions 7, they are<br />

not significant except in 1993. This is in sharp contrast with the results<br />

of similar regressions made <strong>for</strong> provincial governments. The<br />

difference may be because only one of the CLGUs was a net loser in<br />

the devolution process in an absolute sense.<br />

Similarly, there is no strong link between per capita local source<br />

revenue and PCHE. While the coeffÉcients of the PCLSR variable are<br />

positive, they are not significant except in 1995.<br />

It is noted that while CLGU allocations on the health sector are<br />

consistent with health need indicators like life expectancy (i.e., with<br />

high life expectancy-CLGUs budgeting less <strong>for</strong> health services), the<br />

relationship between these variables is not statistically significant<br />

except in 1994.<br />

The coefficients of POPGRin the PCED equations have negative<br />

signs as in the PCHE equations. However, these coefficients are not<br />

statistically significant. The same result holds <strong>for</strong> the URB variable.<br />

All these lend some support to the existence of an urban fiscal gap.<br />

The DI*PCIRA and the PCIRA are the only statistically<br />

significant explanatory variable in the PCED regressions, s The sign<br />

of the coefficient of the Dl*PCIRAvariable is positive indicating that<br />

relative net gainers in the devolution process tend to allocate their<br />

windfall resources to the education sector. However, the negative sign<br />

of the coefficient of the PCIRA variable suggests that on the whole,<br />

per capita education expenditure of CLGUs tend to fall with higher<br />

per capita IRA.<br />

Per capita local source revenue does not appear to be a good<br />

explanatory variable <strong>for</strong> PCED; Its coefficients in the PCED regressions<br />

are not significant except in 1991.<br />

_'he negative relationship between D I*PCIRA and PCHE indicates that relative net gainers in<br />

the devolution process tend to spend less on health at the margin compared with the relative<br />

net losers.<br />

SThe D I*PCIRA is significant in 1993 and 1995 while the PCIRA is significant in 1991 and 1994,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!