07.01.2015 Views

New Scientist - 31 May 2014.bak

New Scientist - 31 May 2014.bak

New Scientist - 31 May 2014.bak

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

FOUR FUTURES FOR SCOTLAND<br />

Take the high road<br />

In 16 weeks’ time, the people of Scotland will decide whether<br />

their country should become independent of the UK. It is not an<br />

easy decision: the political, economic and cultural questions have<br />

been debated for months.<br />

There are other dimensions to consider, too, including science,<br />

technology and the environment. These can shape any country’s<br />

fate just as much as the social factors – perhaps more so, for a<br />

small new nation looking to carve out its place in the world.<br />

<strong>New</strong> <strong>Scientist</strong> looks at how an independent Scotland might reinvest<br />

its oil riches, become a high-tech hub, a green beacon – or the<br />

sickest country in Europe<br />

SMALL nations can shape their own destiny, and this<br />

can be both a blessing and a curse. If the Scots opt<br />

for independence, they would do well to heed other<br />

small nations before them.<br />

Research by the innovation-fostering charity<br />

Nesta has looked at small countries that have<br />

prospered in the last few decades. Take tiny Estonia,<br />

with a population one-quarter the size of Scotland’s.<br />

It is the poster child for newly independent states.<br />

Estonia’s government took advantage of freedom<br />

from the USSR in 1991 to turn the country into a<br />

technology superpower in miniature. From the free<br />

public Wi-Fi in Tallinn to compulsory coding lessons<br />

in schools, Estonia bet big on IT. And it paid off:<br />

Estonians built the technology behind Skype and<br />

run a host of cool start-ups.<br />

But for every Estonia there’s an Iceland. Around the<br />

time the Estonians embarked on their technological<br />

adventure, the Icelanders set themselves up as the<br />

buccaneers of international capitalism. It ended<br />

badly, with the country’s banks collapsing and the<br />

country facing years of painful austerity.<br />

So an independent Scotland must choose its<br />

path carefully. There are a number of directions it<br />

could decide on: oil-investment paradise, renewableenergy<br />

Mecca, high-tech playground.<br />

None of these three scenarios is a sure-fire hit.<br />

High-tech industries could always go the way of<br />

“Silicon Glen”, a region in central Scotland where<br />

electronics manufacturers once flocked. In its heyday<br />

in the mid-1990s, it was claimed that Silicon Glen<br />

produced 35 per cent of PCs in western Europe. But<br />

this success vanished almost overnight when the<br />

dotcom bubble burst and companies headed east in<br />

search of lower costs.<br />

Such scenarios are plausible futures for Scotland,<br />

and there is also a fourth future; one that is more<br />

troubling. Without a plan or a sense of where to<br />

take the nation, it is possible that an independent<br />

Scotland may drift into business-as-usual. Or<br />

perhaps from an economic point of view, it would<br />

be more accurate to call this business-and-financialservices-as-usual<br />

– the time-honoured British model<br />

of an economy run by bankers, built on debt and<br />

managed to the timetable of the quarterly<br />

financial results.<br />

As the experience of Iceland and the Republic of<br />

Ireland shows, this is a perilous path, especially for<br />

a small country. It’s partly about risk: as we have<br />

seen, the financial services sector can act as an<br />

engine for the economy, but it has a nasty habit<br />

of blowing up on the motorway.<br />

There is also something deeper at stake: if<br />

Scotland makes the wrong decisions about its own<br />

economic future, it risks ending up as a backwater<br />

to the rest of the UK, with England – and London<br />

in particular – sucking away its brightest and best.<br />

Independence offers a chance for Scotland to<br />

shape its destiny, but whatever future it aims for,<br />

it must avoid clinging to the old British habit of<br />

muddling through. ■<br />

Stian Westlake is executive director of research<br />

at Nesta in London. Nesta’s report, When Small is<br />

Beautiful: Successful innovation in smaller countries,<br />

will be published on 30 June<br />

MARK PINDER/REPORTDIGITAL.CO.UK<br />

Oil and gas is at<br />

heart of Scots’<br />

future wealth<br />

Rob Edwards, Grangemouth<br />

AS DUSK falls, Grangemouth starts to<br />

glow. Cloaked in clouds of steam and lit<br />

by flares like giant candles, Scotland’s<br />

biggest oil refinery has a strange<br />

beauty. Situated roughly halfway<br />

between Edinburgh and Glasgow on<br />

the Firth of Forth, the 700-hectare<br />

petrochemical complex is a vital hub<br />

of UK oil production. Should Scotland<br />

vote for independence, it will be one<br />

of the new government’s key assets.<br />

According to the industry, there are<br />

between 15 and 24 billion barrels of<br />

recoverable oil and gas left under the<br />

North Sea. About 42bn barrels have<br />

been extracted since production<br />

began there in 1967. Because prices<br />

have risen, 24bn barrels could be<br />

12 | <strong>New</strong><strong>Scientist</strong> | <strong>31</strong> <strong>May</strong> 2014

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!