- Page 1 and 2: TO THE SUBROGATE PRESIDENT OF THE P
- Page 3: 3.4.3 Mr. Cabrera’s Fieldwork Was
- Page 7 and 8: the arguments in the Cabrera Report
- Page 9 and 10: negligence where TexPet was directl
- Page 11 and 12: they not only secretly conspired us
- Page 13 and 14: has repeatedly shown to be corrupte
- Page 15 and 16: plaintiffs’ egregious and fraudul
- Page 17 and 18: to annul the rulings of Judge Núñ
- Page 19 and 20: filed on September 16, 2010 at 5:15
- Page 21 and 22: after the conclusion of the evident
- Page 23 and 24: conditions in the Amazon region rel
- Page 25 and 26: during Consortium operations, Chevr
- Page 27 and 28: alleged liability and obligations w
- Page 29 and 30: the basis of Article 2260 of the Ci
- Page 31 and 32: 1.1 Chevron Never Operated in Ecuad
- Page 33 and 34: Plaintiffs allege that this corpora
- Page 35 and 36: in the complaints in the[] U.S. act
- Page 37 and 38: If the plaintiffs had timely sued T
- Page 39 and 40: 2.1 The Plaintiffs Submitted Fabric
- Page 41 and 42: As Dr. Calmbacher’s testimony ind
- Page 43 and 44: were “choreographed”; just “a
- Page 45 and 46: in working clandestinely and in col
- Page 47 and 48: Rather, he worked alongside, and on
- Page 49 and 50: During this meeting of March 3, 200
- Page 51 and 52: course you really have to be comfor
- Page 53 and 54: David Mills, another of plaintiffs
- Page 55 and 56:
consultants—it can no longer be c
- Page 57 and 58:
ecome the Cabrera Report, a note ob
- Page 59 and 60:
assembled a team of experts” beca
- Page 61 and 62:
And even Mr. Donziger himself predi
- Page 63 and 64:
from the supplemental report’s an
- Page 65 and 66:
Mr. Cabrera repeatedly promised to
- Page 67 and 68:
• Mr. Cabrera breached his obliga
- Page 69 and 70:
Second, to exaggerate his volume fi
- Page 71 and 72:
headquarters in Quito. The recordin
- Page 73 and 74:
(viii) The award will be made in pa
- Page 75 and 76:
Chevron which are unreasoned, viola
- Page 77 and 78:
complete investigation, particularl
- Page 79 and 80:
was submitted, Mr. Donziger told th
- Page 81 and 82:
this case by completely dismissing
- Page 83 and 84:
mechanism—a second, ad hoc eviden
- Page 85 and 86:
attempted to confirm, it recognized
- Page 87 and 88:
equested that Judge Ordóñez be re
- Page 89 and 90:
protocols for analyzing samples tak
- Page 91 and 92:
The plaintiffs first tried, in Janu
- Page 93 and 94:
Accordingly, Chevron opposed the re
- Page 95 and 96:
possibility to defend itself, refut
- Page 97 and 98:
seen conceding in the Crude outtake
- Page 99 and 100:
eport could be analyzed by the cour
- Page 101 and 102:
lacked those qualifications. Indeed
- Page 103 and 104:
and the installation of geomembrane
- Page 105 and 106:
guessing . . . always confused.”
- Page 107 and 108:
samples of doubtful origin and inad
- Page 109 and 110:
Indeed, although Mr. Cabrera stated
- Page 111 and 112:
degree of scientific certainty that
- Page 113 and 114:
pathways”-to “recommend that th
- Page 115 and 116:
ecommended an economic value of bil
- Page 117 and 118:
Chevron also invoked its constituti
- Page 119 and 120:
postponed a decision. 497 For insta
- Page 121 and 122:
“was not engaging in any exercise
- Page 123 and 124:
jurisdiction over Chevron. Then, as
- Page 125 and 126:
hasten a large judgment against Che
- Page 127 and 128:
Mr. Berlinger recently corroborated
- Page 129 and 130:
with him.” 536 The plaintiffs eve
- Page 131 and 132:
has “the most ridiculous legal cu
- Page 133 and 134:
Government “already [knew] about
- Page 135 and 136:
gathering evidence” against Chevr
- Page 137 and 138:
amount of money, and there are no a
- Page 139 and 140:
ecommended dismissal of the 2003 cr
- Page 141 and 142:
to settle the civil case. 608 Docum
- Page 143 and 144:
that the Government was managing Ju
- Page 145 and 146:
essential formalities with nullity
- Page 147 and 148:
4.2 Nullity Due to This Court’s L
- Page 149 and 150:
oth on the provisions of the Civil
- Page 151 and 152:
4.4 Nullity Due to the Lack of Lega
- Page 153 and 154:
The common legal representative’s
- Page 155 and 156:
continue to hear [the case] until t
- Page 157 and 158:
the right to bring all indivisible
- Page 159 and 160:
Each municipal suit was settled in
- Page 161 and 162:
Like the local governments, the Gov
- Page 163 and 164:
These services were to be administe
- Page 165 and 166:
5.2.4 The Settlement Agreements Sig
- Page 167 and 168:
elease collective claims based on t
- Page 169 and 170:
effect of administrative acts “is
- Page 171 and 172:
i.e., to the inability to anticipat
- Page 173 and 174:
This was expressly acknowledged by
- Page 175 and 176:
plaintiffs’ alleged claims, it co
- Page 177 and 178:
the complaint.” 768 Accordingly,
- Page 179 and 180:
management of natural resources, an
- Page 181 and 182:
Article 43 created a new course [si
- Page 183 and 184:
plaintiff shall not amend it, nor s
- Page 185 and 186:
Because the complaint sought compen
- Page 187 and 188:
category of damages we possibly can
- Page 189 and 190:
ecovery for such a claim must go di
- Page 191 and 192:
v. “Recovery of the land and cult
- Page 193 and 194:
Plaintiffs’ argument is wrong on
- Page 195 and 196:
damages, based on conduct preceding
- Page 197 and 198:
7.2 Plaintiffs Have Failed to Prove
- Page 199 and 200:
tripled the requested damages from
- Page 201 and 202:
damages. Moreover, the new reports
- Page 203 and 204:
conditions and liabilities within t
- Page 205 and 206:
ing them below 1,000 mg TCLP-TPH pe
- Page 207 and 208:
The areas remediated by TexPet requ
- Page 209 and 210:
cleanup of the very sites in questi
- Page 211 and 212:
water resource, under any hypotheti
- Page 213 and 214:
None of this could have been a surp
- Page 215 and 216:
with TexPet. 927 In September 2007,
- Page 217 and 218:
excess of what any similar remediat
- Page 219 and 220:
plaintiffs’ proposed plans to ins
- Page 221 and 222:
extra petita. In all events, any su
- Page 223 and 224:
epresentative of the Frente—the n
- Page 225 and 226:
establish a causal connection betwe
- Page 227 and 228:
Stratus, the paid consultants hired
- Page 229 and 230:
eached by disregarding the data pro
- Page 231 and 232:
As the Government had intended, col
- Page 233 and 234:
equests for damages. 1021 For examp
- Page 235 and 236:
of a particular hazardous substance
- Page 237 and 238:
Agreement, Scope of Work, and RAP,
- Page 239 and 240:
detected. However, none of these co
- Page 241 and 242:
contamination. 1050 This Court shou
- Page 243 and 244:
enrichment for the victim.” 1062
- Page 245 and 246:
accord, and acknowledge that a clai
- Page 247 and 248:
In any event, even if an unjust enr
- Page 249 and 250:
Second, since TexPet already undert
- Page 251 and 252:
• With regard to pit remediation,
- Page 253 and 254:
away from the figures” in the pla
- Page 255 and 256:
maintained, and corroded pipelines.
- Page 257 and 258:
the claimed health effects they all
- Page 259 and 260:
Article 7(20) of the Civil Code pro
- Page 261 and 262:
3. As Your Honor is aware since it
- Page 263:
g) Total lack of effective and time