- Page 1: CLUSTERS ARE INDIVIDUALS NGP NGP Cl
- Page 5 and 6: TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
- Page 7 and 8: INDEX OF TABLES Table 1: Benchmarki
- Page 9 and 10: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In economic and i
- Page 11 and 12: 1. INTRODUCTION In economic and inn
- Page 13 and 14: There is an emerging consensus that
- Page 15 and 16: DIMENSIONS INDICATORS Age of the cl
- Page 17 and 18: 2. RESULTS OF THE BENCHMARKING OF C
- Page 19 and 20: 2.2 CHARACTERISTICS OF CLUSTER MANA
- Page 21 and 22: these clusters since the establishm
- Page 23 and 24: 2.2.5 FINANCING OF CLUSTER MANAGEME
- Page 25 and 26: Age Share of clusters having initia
- Page 27 and 28: Share of clusters with high appeara
- Page 29 and 30: 2.3.4 THE CHARACTERISTICS OF A CLUS
- Page 31 and 32: Against the backdrop of the other k
- Page 33 and 34: 3. RESULTS OF THE BENCHMARKING OF C
- Page 35 and 36: 3.2 CHARACTERISTICS OF CLUSTER PR0G
- Page 37 and 38: NAME OF THE PROGRAM ESTABLISHMENT O
- Page 39 and 40: Cluster Offensive Bayern No Yes No
- Page 41 and 42: and regular meetings between progra
- Page 43 and 44: REGIONAL CLUSTER PROGRAM OSKE - CEN
- Page 45 and 46: 3.3 KEY FINDINGS The benchmarking o
- Page 47 and 48: ment through Competence Networks Ge
- Page 49 and 50: 3.3.4 INTERNATIONALIZATION OF CLUST
- Page 51 and 52: Programs that attach high relevance
- Page 53 and 54:
The rationale behind a more active,
- Page 55 and 56:
tool to support the further develop
- Page 57 and 58:
implementation) the following princ
- Page 59 and 60:
4. POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS Clusters
- Page 61 and 62:
THE AUTHORS THOMAS LÄMMER-GAMP is
- Page 63 and 64:
1. INTRODUCTION The benchmarking of
- Page 65 and 66:
2.1.1.3 Term of the Program, Financ
- Page 67 and 68:
INDICATORS Output Results Impact
- Page 69 and 70:
2.2.1.3 Term of the Program, Financ
- Page 71 and 72:
2.2.2 ZENTRALES INNOVATIONSPROGRAMM
- Page 73 and 74:
2.2.2.4 Instruments ZIM-NEMO provid
- Page 75 and 76:
2.2.3 CLUSTER OFFENSIVE BAYERN (BAV
- Page 77 and 78:
2.2.3.4 Instruments The key element
- Page 79 and 80:
With R&D programs 4 3 2 1 0 With bu
- Page 81 and 82:
Coordination of activities through
- Page 83 and 84:
2.3 NORWAY 2.3.1 NORWEGIAN CENTRES
- Page 85 and 86:
2.3.1.3 Term of the Program, Financ
- Page 87 and 88:
2.3.1.6 Monitoring and evaluation s
- Page 89 and 90:
Norway (SIVA) and the Research Coun
- Page 91 and 92:
2.3.2.4 Instruments Support for the
- Page 93 and 94:
How important is the cluster progra
- Page 95 and 96:
2.4.1.3 Term of the Program, Financ
- Page 97 and 98:
2.4.1.6 Monitoring and evaluation s
- Page 99 and 100:
2.4.2 REGIONALT KLUSTERPROGRAM (REG
- Page 101 and 102:
manner. Companies that were partner
- Page 103 and 104:
2.5 FINLAND 2.5.1 THE CENTRE OF EXP
- Page 105 and 106:
Competence Cluster Centre of Expert
- Page 107 and 108:
environments in order to lure inter
- Page 109 and 110:
The coordination of the program wit
- Page 111 and 112:
organizations. Technology, service
- Page 113 and 114:
With R&D programs 4 3 2 1 0 With bu
- Page 115 and 116:
2.6.1.4 Instruments The program pro
- Page 117 and 118:
With R&D programs 4 3 2 1 0 With bu
- Page 119 and 120:
The program provides grant funding
- Page 121 and 122:
2.7 POLAND 2.7.1 POLISH CLUSTER SUP
- Page 123 and 124:
Name of the program Operational Pro
- Page 125 and 126:
2.8 FRANCE 2.8.1 GRAPPE D’ENTREPR
- Page 127 and 128:
How important is the cluster progra
- Page 129 and 130:
2.9.1.3 Term of the Program, Financ
- Page 132:
CO-SPONSORS: