10.01.2015 Views

Innovation in China - The Institute For Fiscal Studies

Innovation in China - The Institute For Fiscal Studies

Innovation in China - The Institute For Fiscal Studies

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

economies. In addition, Ch<strong>in</strong>ese <strong>in</strong>ventors often work alongside <strong>in</strong>ventors from the firm’s<br />

home country <strong>in</strong> creat<strong>in</strong>g patentable technologies. This is likely to aid the flow of knowledge<br />

across different parts of the firm. We f<strong>in</strong>d no evidence to that Ch<strong>in</strong>ese <strong>in</strong>ventors are more<br />

likely to be work<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> teams when creat<strong>in</strong>g near science <strong>in</strong>novations than other<br />

<strong>in</strong>novations.<br />

<strong>The</strong> growth <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>novation <strong>in</strong> emerg<strong>in</strong>g economies (both by domestic firms and Western<br />

mult<strong>in</strong>ationals) has led to concerns <strong>in</strong> the West that Ch<strong>in</strong>a’s progress may lead it to rival the<br />

West's positions as technological leaders, and potentially result <strong>in</strong> a loss of high skilled jobs.<br />

<strong>The</strong> European policy debate had focus heavily on the relatively low proportion of GDP that is<br />

<strong>in</strong>vested <strong>in</strong> R&D. <strong>The</strong> latest figures (2007) show that bus<strong>in</strong>ess expenditure on R&D <strong>in</strong> the EU-<br />

15 amounts to 1.2% of GDP compared with 1.9% <strong>in</strong> the US and 1.1% <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a. 7 <strong>The</strong>re has<br />

been a particular concern <strong>in</strong> the UK, where levels of bus<strong>in</strong>ess R&D <strong>in</strong>tensity are low (1.15%<br />

<strong>in</strong> 2007) and have been decl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g. <strong>The</strong> Lisbon target to substantially <strong>in</strong>crease R&D spend<strong>in</strong>g<br />

by 2010 will be missed by a large marg<strong>in</strong> (see van Pottelsberghe (2008)). Concerns also stem<br />

from the much more rapid <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>vestment by firms <strong>in</strong> emerg<strong>in</strong>g economies, and the<br />

surveyed op<strong>in</strong>ion that Europe is becom<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly less desirable location for R&D.<br />

(Ernst & Young (2010))<br />

<strong>The</strong>se concerns are not completely unfounded. Soete (2009), <strong>in</strong> work prepared for the<br />

European Commission, concluded that if the recent trends <strong>in</strong> R&D cont<strong>in</strong>ue then “<strong>in</strong> 2025,<br />

the United States and Europe will have lost their scientific and technological supremacy for<br />

the benefit of Asia”. Freeman (2006, 2009) outl<strong>in</strong>es the potential for shifts <strong>in</strong> the global job<br />

market for science and eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g workers towards Ch<strong>in</strong>a to erode US dom<strong>in</strong>ance by<br />

dim<strong>in</strong>ish<strong>in</strong>g the current comparative advantage <strong>in</strong> high tech production. Articulat<strong>in</strong>g many<br />

of the concerns <strong>in</strong> the West, he says that the <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> highly skilled graduates <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a<br />

“threatens to undo the ‘North-South’ pattern of trade <strong>in</strong> which advanced countries<br />

dom<strong>in</strong>ate high tech while develop<strong>in</strong>g countries specialize <strong>in</strong> less skilled manufactur<strong>in</strong>g”. 8<br />

5

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!