Development Strategies of Engineering Education in Globalized ...
Development Strategies of Engineering Education in Globalized ...
Development Strategies of Engineering Education in Globalized ...
Transform your PDFs into Flipbooks and boost your revenue!
Leverage SEO-optimized Flipbooks, powerful backlinks, and multimedia content to professionally showcase your products and significantly increase your reach.
<strong>Development</strong> <strong>Strategies</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Education</strong> <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>Globalized</strong> Economy<br />
Jianzhong Cha<br />
UNESCO Chair Holder on Cooperation between<br />
<strong>Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Education</strong> and Industries<br />
Pr<strong>of</strong>essor, Beij<strong>in</strong>g Jiaotong University<br />
Board Member and Guest Pr<strong>of</strong>essor<br />
Group T University College Leuven, Belgium<br />
UNESCO, SOI Lecture Series<br />
August 26, 2009 Beij<strong>in</strong>g
Outl<strong>in</strong>e<br />
UNESCO Chair on University-Industry<br />
Cooperation<br />
Integrated <strong>Strategies</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g</strong><br />
<strong>Education</strong> reform<br />
Case study <strong>of</strong> the Best Practice
Introduction on<br />
the UNESCO Chair<br />
1.Initiated and supported by M<strong>in</strong>ister <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>Education</strong> <strong>of</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a, Dr. Zhou Ji<br />
2.Aim at strategic study for Ch<strong>in</strong>ese<br />
eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g education reform<br />
3. To make use resources <strong>of</strong> UNESCO<br />
4. UNESCO Four Pillars:<br />
Learn to Know, Learn to Do<br />
Learn to Live together, Learn to Be
Macro Control Model for<br />
<strong>Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Education</strong><br />
Driv<strong>in</strong>g force<br />
Policy<br />
Leadership<br />
Resurces<br />
…<br />
<strong>Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Education</strong><br />
<strong>in</strong>stitutions<br />
Program, Curricula,<br />
Teachers, Pedagogic method,<br />
Contents<br />
Eng<strong>in</strong>eer Pr<strong>of</strong>ession<br />
Society needs<br />
Key stakeholders’needs<br />
<strong>Strategies</strong> and<br />
measures<br />
for improvement<br />
assessment<br />
Student<br />
Program<br />
University<br />
Employment rate and quality<br />
Of graduates<br />
Skills and attributs required by<br />
Eng<strong>in</strong>eer pr<strong>of</strong>ession
Stakeholder Analysis for the<br />
Goal <strong>of</strong> <strong>Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Education</strong><br />
Government<br />
Industry<br />
Student/P<br />
arents<br />
University<br />
/<br />
college<br />
Policy/fund<strong>in</strong>g/lea<br />
dership<br />
Pr<strong>of</strong>essional<br />
context<br />
for<br />
eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g<br />
education<br />
High employment rate, social<br />
stability/security, high speed<br />
steady development <strong>of</strong><br />
economy, taxation<br />
Large qty. high quality talents<br />
for competitiveness<br />
In worldwide market<br />
Tuition /time Skills and attributes for<br />
<strong>Education</strong><br />
resource<br />
facility<br />
and<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>essional career and good<br />
job<br />
High employment rate and<br />
quality <strong>of</strong> graduate,<br />
outstand<strong>in</strong>g alumni, good<br />
reputation <strong>in</strong> society
The goal <strong>of</strong> eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g education<br />
(1)To meet the requirement <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry on<br />
talents – Cradle <strong>of</strong> Eng<strong>in</strong>eers<br />
Provid<strong>in</strong>g graduates with abilities accord<strong>in</strong>g to<br />
standard <strong>of</strong> eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g pr<strong>of</strong>ession<br />
(2) To satisfy needs <strong>of</strong> students on jobs –<br />
Career-oriented education<br />
mak<strong>in</strong>g students more competitive <strong>in</strong> world job<br />
market<br />
(3) To meet strategic target <strong>of</strong> build<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>in</strong>novative society <strong>of</strong> the government
Assessment on performance <strong>of</strong><br />
eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g education<br />
Invest<strong>in</strong>g requirements <strong>of</strong> abilities from <strong>in</strong>dustry<br />
Assess<strong>in</strong>g education quality from eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>ession<br />
Analyz<strong>in</strong>g gap between graduates’ abilities and<br />
<strong>in</strong>dustry needs<br />
Invest<strong>in</strong>g and assess<strong>in</strong>g from <strong>in</strong>dustry sets up<br />
base for cont<strong>in</strong>uous improvement
New needs on eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g talents<br />
from global economy<br />
“The world is flat”: : <strong>in</strong>dustry, resources and<br />
products transit worldwide<br />
Industry transition & upgrad<strong>in</strong>g br<strong>in</strong>g up new<br />
challenge and opportunity to eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g<br />
education<br />
<br />
<br />
Developed countries:upgrad<strong>in</strong>g upgrad<strong>in</strong>g to the highest<br />
end <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry (<strong>in</strong>novation/entrepreneurship)<br />
Emerg<strong>in</strong>g countries (Ch<strong>in</strong>a, India):<br />
):upgrad<strong>in</strong>g<br />
to middle and high end <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry – OEM to<br />
ODM
New Requirements on Talents<br />
<br />
Internationalization:cultivat<strong>in</strong>g talents<br />
by <strong>in</strong>ternational standard (e.g.,<br />
Wash<strong>in</strong>gton Accord)<br />
<br />
Quality upgrad<strong>in</strong>g:to meet needs <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>in</strong>dustry upgrad<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<br />
Quantity <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g:most eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g<br />
talents switch to service sectors <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>in</strong>dustry from pure technology field
Industry needs <strong>in</strong> qty.<br />
<strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a:<br />
- multi-nation companies (280k, 3% <strong>of</strong> total) need 750k<br />
quality graduates <strong>in</strong> 5 years, 60% total available resource;<br />
Other 40% <strong>of</strong> graduates for domestic companies (97% <strong>of</strong> total)<br />
- short <strong>of</strong> 500k IT talents every year, annually <strong>in</strong>creased<br />
by 20%, but only 120K per year come out from colleges<br />
<strong>in</strong> Europe: : short <strong>of</strong> 2.5 million eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g related<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>essionals for next 5 years<br />
<strong>in</strong> USA, , workforce for science and eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>creased<br />
1.5 times <strong>in</strong> 20 years, but enrollment <strong>of</strong> eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g study for<br />
citizen and PR decreased by 20%<br />
Same phenomena <strong>in</strong> Japan, Taiwan, South Korea<br />
Worldwide shortage <strong>of</strong> quality eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g talents
Desired attributes <strong>of</strong> an eng<strong>in</strong>eer<br />
source: Boe<strong>in</strong>g Management Company<br />
A good understand<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g science fundamentals<br />
A good understand<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> design and manufactur<strong>in</strong>g process<br />
A multi-discipl<strong>in</strong>ary, systems perspective<br />
A basic understand<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> the context <strong>in</strong> which eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g is<br />
practical<br />
Good communication skills<br />
High ethical standards<br />
Ability to th<strong>in</strong>k both critically and creatively-<strong>in</strong>dependently <strong>in</strong>dependently and<br />
cooperatively<br />
Flexibility: the ability and self-confidence to adapt to rapid or<br />
major changes<br />
Curiosity and desire to learn for life<br />
A pr<strong>of</strong>ound understand<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> importance <strong>of</strong> team work
Root causes for the gap between<br />
talent supply and demand<br />
Short supply <strong>of</strong> eng<strong>in</strong>er<strong>in</strong>g students <strong>in</strong><br />
developed world<br />
Divorce <strong>of</strong> education and <strong>in</strong>dustry<br />
<strong>Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g</strong> education <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Rich quality student resource+ largest<br />
eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g education scale + huge human<br />
resource market<br />
Instruction-based top-down pedagogic<br />
methodology<br />
Unclear goal <strong>of</strong> eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g education <strong>in</strong> the market<br />
Learn to take exams, not learn to do<br />
Inaccurate assessment on eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g education
Ma<strong>in</strong> Quality Problems<br />
Lack <strong>of</strong> basic abilities required by eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>ession(e.g., e.g., learn<strong>in</strong>g、problem solv<strong>in</strong>g, team<br />
work<strong>in</strong>g, communication, ethic and pr<strong>of</strong>essionism)<br />
Lack <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>novation(out out <strong>of</strong> 32m. technology personnel,<br />
only.25% engag<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>novative work)<br />
Low entrepreneurship(
<strong>Strategies</strong> for <strong>Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g</strong><br />
<strong>Education</strong> Reform<br />
Learn<strong>in</strong>g<br />
by do<strong>in</strong>g<br />
World standard<br />
talents<br />
U-I<br />
Co-op<br />
International<br />
lization<br />
U/I Co-Op <strong>Education</strong>-Mechanisms<br />
Internationalization- Strategic Goal<br />
Learn<strong>in</strong>g by Do<strong>in</strong>g- Pedagogic Methodology (CDIO)
Application and Promotion<br />
Apply to higher vocational education first, which<br />
closer to the <strong>in</strong>dustry and need reform theory<br />
Best practice study by sett<strong>in</strong>g up research bases<br />
Dist<strong>in</strong>guish generalized pr<strong>in</strong>ciples and specialty <strong>in</strong><br />
practice, to promote successful general models: Job-<br />
oriented, Co-Op <strong>Education</strong>, learn<strong>in</strong>g by do<strong>in</strong>g and<br />
globalization<br />
Publiciz<strong>in</strong>g through media and academic publications<br />
Propose to M<strong>in</strong>istry <strong>of</strong> Educaiton for policy mak<strong>in</strong>g
Best Practice <strong>of</strong> <strong>Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g</strong><br />
<strong>Education</strong><br />
Co-Op <strong>Education</strong> Program <strong>in</strong> 1500 univ./college <strong>in</strong> 43<br />
countries:University <strong>of</strong> Waterloo <strong>of</strong> Canada<br />
200K college students jo<strong>in</strong> Co-Op program under<br />
support <strong>of</strong> 120K companies <strong>in</strong> USA<br />
Group T <strong>of</strong> Belgium; WPI <strong>of</strong> USA<br />
109 Demonstrative Higher Vocational Tech. Colleges<br />
succeed on implement<strong>in</strong>g “Job-Oriented/ Co-Op/<br />
Learn<strong>in</strong>g by do<strong>in</strong>g” model <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a<br />
37 Demonstrative S<strong>of</strong>tware <strong>Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g</strong> Schools<br />
succeed with model <strong>of</strong> “Career-oriented/ Univ.-<br />
Industry Coop/ Project-based Learn<strong>in</strong>g/<br />
Internationalization” , become cradle <strong>of</strong> competitive<br />
s<strong>of</strong>tware eng<strong>in</strong>eers
“If we teach today as we taught<br />
yesterday, we rob our children<br />
<strong>of</strong> tomorrow<br />
—John Dewey<br />
We must cont<strong>in</strong>uously improve our<br />
education!
联 合 国 教 育 、 科 学 、 文 化 组 织<br />
Thank you for your<br />
attention!<br />
Q&A
Salary change <strong>of</strong> different<br />
education <strong>in</strong> USA<br />
来 源 :Michael E. Porter, “THE COMPETITIVENESS INDEX:WHERE AMERICA STANDS”,Council on competitiveness
Student Resource for<br />
<strong>Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Education</strong><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
2006: 70k eng<strong>in</strong>eers from USA, 700k from Ch<strong>in</strong>a<br />
Ch<strong>in</strong>a: Enrollment for eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g study<br />
800k college students<br />
1 million students <strong>of</strong> higher vocational <strong>in</strong>stitutes<br />
Percentage <strong>of</strong> eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g study <strong>in</strong> higher<br />
education<br />
Ch<strong>in</strong>a>35%<br />
Japan
250,000<br />
# <strong>of</strong> eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g Bachelor<br />
<strong>of</strong>fered by countries<br />
人<br />
200,000<br />
150,000<br />
100,000<br />
50,000<br />
0<br />
1985<br />
1987<br />
1989<br />
1991<br />
1993<br />
1995<br />
1996<br />
1997<br />
1998<br />
2000<br />
中 国<br />
美 国<br />
日 本<br />
韩 国<br />
英 国<br />
德 国
60.0%<br />
Rate <strong>of</strong> Engg. Bachellor vs.<br />
All Bachelor<br />
比 例<br />
50.0%<br />
40.0%<br />
30.0%<br />
20.0%<br />
10.0%<br />
0.0%<br />
1985<br />
1987<br />
1989<br />
1991<br />
1993<br />
1995<br />
1996<br />
1997<br />
1998<br />
2000<br />
中 国<br />
美 国<br />
日 本<br />
韩 国<br />
英 国<br />
德 国
NOTIONAL DEVELOPMENT OF<br />
ENGINEERING EDUCATION<br />
Personal and<br />
Interpersonal<br />
Skills, and<br />
Product,<br />
Process, and<br />
System Build<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Skills<br />
Pre-1950s:<br />
Practice<br />
1960s:<br />
Science &<br />
practice<br />
2000:<br />
CDIO<br />
1980s:<br />
Science<br />
Eng<strong>in</strong>eers need both dimensions, and we need to develop<br />
education that delivers both<br />
Discipl<strong>in</strong>ary<br />
Knowledge
Employable rate by multi-national<br />
companies among applicants<br />
地 区<br />
国 家<br />
工 程 师<br />
金 融 / 会 计<br />
通 才<br />
中 欧 和 东<br />
欧<br />
亚 洲<br />
拉 美<br />
南 美<br />
匈 牙 利<br />
捷 克<br />
波 兰<br />
俄 国<br />
马 来 西 亚<br />
印 度<br />
菲 律 宾<br />
中 国<br />
墨 西 哥 2<br />
巴 西<br />
50<br />
50<br />
50<br />
10<br />
35<br />
25<br />
20<br />
10<br />
20<br />
13<br />
50<br />
40<br />
30<br />
20<br />
25<br />
15<br />
30<br />
15<br />
25<br />
13<br />
30<br />
20<br />
15<br />
10<br />
20<br />
10<br />
25<br />
3<br />
11<br />
8<br />
1. Suitability rates empirically based on 83 <strong>in</strong>terviews with human-resources (HR) pr<strong>of</strong>essionals work<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> countries shown.<br />
2. Mexico is the only country where <strong>in</strong>terview results were adjusted to 20%(form 42%) for eng<strong>in</strong>eers and to 25%(from 35%)<br />
for f<strong>in</strong>ance/account<strong>in</strong>g employees-s<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>in</strong>terview base was th<strong>in</strong>ner and risk <strong>of</strong> misunderstand<strong>in</strong>gs high.<br />
Source: Interviews with HR managers, HR agencies, and heads <strong>of</strong> global-resourc<strong>in</strong>g centers; McK<strong>in</strong>sey<br />
Global Institute analysis
各 国 工 程 师 达 到 国 际 标 准 比 例<br />
出 处 :Michael E. Porter, “THE COMPETITIVENESS INDEX:WHERE AMERICA STANDS”,Council on competitiveness
Strategy 2: Internationalization<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Mak<strong>in</strong>g use <strong>of</strong> the best student resources and<br />
education facilities for global eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g talent<br />
market<br />
Core: to cultivate talents by <strong>in</strong>ternational<br />
standard<br />
RMIT:Foster<strong>in</strong>g global citizen and pr<strong>of</strong>essionals,<br />
globally employable<br />
India:350K/year eng<strong>in</strong>eers enter global market,<br />
will be 1.4 million/per year from 2015 on (Tony<br />
Blair)<br />
Leaders and teachers with global vision, capacity<br />
and strategy (Group T) T<br />
<strong>Globalized</strong> university-<strong>in</strong>dustry <strong>in</strong>dustry cooperation:<br />
RMIT,WPI)
International exchange and cooperation,<br />
<br />
(Shanghai Jiaotong U./ U.<strong>of</strong> Michigan)<br />
Student mobility: build<strong>in</strong>g up on-campus<br />
<br />
<strong>in</strong>ternational environment to accommodate<br />
foreign students<br />
USA: 40% <strong>of</strong> graduate students from abroad;<br />
Oxford: 25% <strong>of</strong> students from 130 countries;<br />
Tokyo Univ.:2000 foreign students from 60<br />
countries;Group T:15% T<br />
<strong>of</strong> students from abroad<br />
Native students will be most benefited by multi-<br />
cultural environment on campus too!
Strategy 1 :Univ. Univ.- Industry Coop<br />
1.To form a complete cha<strong>in</strong> for talent cultivation<br />
• To meet requirements from Industry<br />
• To <strong>in</strong>troduce <strong>in</strong>dustrial pr<strong>of</strong>ession <strong>in</strong>to education as its<br />
context (outcomes, curricula, teach<strong>in</strong>g resource,<br />
assessment,….)<br />
• Industry should contribute to education as its human<br />
resource strategy<br />
• Government/<strong>in</strong>dustry/education/students & parents wor<br />
together for talent cultivation<br />
This is responsibility <strong>of</strong> whole society!<br />
Complete talents cannot be fostered<br />
<strong>in</strong> isolated education <strong>in</strong>stitution!
Tips for Cooperation with<br />
Industry<br />
Mutual Interest driven - w<strong>in</strong>-w<strong>in</strong> situation<br />
Re<strong>in</strong>forced management on Co-Op <strong>Education</strong><br />
Cost <strong>in</strong>crease – diversified fund reources<br />
# <strong>of</strong> enterprises / # <strong>of</strong> students ≥ 1/3<br />
Policy to encourage from government
Univ.-Industry Coop cont.<br />
2. . To form a complete <strong>in</strong>dustrial <strong>in</strong>novation cha<strong>in</strong><br />
• New mechanism for <strong>in</strong>novation<br />
• Industry- ma<strong>in</strong> body for <strong>in</strong>dustrial <strong>in</strong>novation<br />
• Government—Policy<br />
mak<strong>in</strong>g,services and <strong>in</strong>itial<br />
fund<br />
• University- ma<strong>in</strong> body for knowledge <strong>in</strong>novation<br />
• Research <strong>in</strong>stitute- bridge between knowledge<br />
<strong>in</strong>novation and <strong>in</strong>dustrial <strong>in</strong>novation with tech.<br />
transfer
Strategy 3:Learn<strong>in</strong>g 3<br />
by do<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Learn<strong>in</strong>g methodology suggested by John<br />
Dewey <strong>in</strong> 1920’s<br />
Project based learn<strong>in</strong>g:Version <strong>of</strong> LbD for<br />
eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g education<br />
CDIO:a a systematic model <strong>of</strong> PbL<br />
CDIO (Conceive,Design,Implement,Operate(<br />
Conceive,Design,Implement,Operate) ) :<br />
represents lifecycle <strong>of</strong> eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g project<br />
(product, process, system, and service)
BEST PRACTICE: THE CDIO<br />
STANDARDS<br />
1. The Context<br />
Adoption <strong>of</strong> the pr<strong>in</strong>ciple that product. Process, and<br />
system lifecycle development and deployment are the<br />
context for eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g education<br />
2. Learn<strong>in</strong>g Outcomes<br />
Specific, detailed learn<strong>in</strong>g outcomes for personal,<br />
<strong>in</strong>terpersonal, and product,.process and system<br />
build<strong>in</strong>g skills, consistent with program goals and<br />
validated by program stakeholders<br />
3. Integrated Curriculum<br />
A curriculum designed with mutually support<strong>in</strong>g<br />
discipl<strong>in</strong>ary subjects, with an explicit plan to <strong>in</strong>tegrate<br />
personal, <strong>in</strong>terpersonal, and product, process, and<br />
system build<strong>in</strong>g skills<br />
4. Introduction to <strong>Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g</strong><br />
An <strong>in</strong>troductory course that provides the framework for<br />
eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g practice <strong>in</strong> product. Process, and system<br />
build<strong>in</strong>g, and <strong>in</strong>troduces essential personal and<br />
<strong>in</strong>terpersonal skills<br />
5. Design-Implement Experiences<br />
A curriculum that <strong>in</strong>cludes two or more designimplement<br />
experiences, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g one at a basic level<br />
and one at an advanced level<br />
6. <strong>Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g</strong> Workspaces<br />
Workspaces and laboratories that support and<br />
encourage hands-on learn<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> product, process, and<br />
system build<strong>in</strong>g, discipl<strong>in</strong>ary knowledge, and social<br />
learn<strong>in</strong>g<br />
7. Integrated Learn<strong>in</strong>g Experiences<br />
Integrated learn<strong>in</strong>g experiences that lead to the<br />
acquisition <strong>of</strong> discipl<strong>in</strong>ary knowledge, as well as<br />
personal, <strong>in</strong>terpersonal, and produc, process,t and<br />
system build<strong>in</strong>g skills<br />
8. Active Learn<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Teach<strong>in</strong>g and learn<strong>in</strong>g based on active experiential<br />
learn<strong>in</strong>g methods<br />
9. Enhancement <strong>of</strong> Faculty Skills Competence<br />
Actions that enhance faculty competence <strong>in</strong> personal,<br />
<strong>in</strong>terpersonal, and product and system build<strong>in</strong>g skills<br />
10. Enhancement <strong>of</strong> Faculty Teach<strong>in</strong>g Competence<br />
Actions that enhance faculty competence <strong>in</strong> provid<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>in</strong>tegrated learn<strong>in</strong>g experiences, <strong>in</strong> us<strong>in</strong>g active<br />
experiential learn<strong>in</strong>g methods, and <strong>in</strong> assess<strong>in</strong>g<br />
student learn<strong>in</strong>g<br />
11. Learn<strong>in</strong>g Assessment<br />
Assessment <strong>of</strong> student learn<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> personal,<br />
<strong>in</strong>terpersonal, and product, process, and system<br />
build<strong>in</strong>g skills, as well as <strong>in</strong> discipl<strong>in</strong>ary knowledge<br />
12. Program Evaluation<br />
A system that evaluates programs aga<strong>in</strong>st these 12<br />
standards, and provides feedback to students, faculty,<br />
and other stakeholders for the purposes <strong>of</strong> cont<strong>in</strong>uous<br />
improvement
CDIO Standard 1 -- The Context<br />
Adoption <strong>of</strong> the pr<strong>in</strong>ciple that product, process, and<br />
system lifecycle development and deployment --<br />
Conceiv<strong>in</strong>g, Design<strong>in</strong>g, Implement<strong>in</strong>g and Operat<strong>in</strong>g --<br />
are the context for eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g education<br />
• It’s s what eng<strong>in</strong>eers do!<br />
• Provides the framework for teach<strong>in</strong>g skills<br />
• Allows deeper learn<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> the fundamentals<br />
• Helps to attract, motivate, and reta<strong>in</strong> students
Unchanged characteristics <strong>of</strong><br />
context <strong>in</strong> eng’g pr<strong>of</strong>ession<br />
Focus on the needs <strong>of</strong> the customer and society<br />
Delivery <strong>of</strong> new products, processes and systems<br />
Role <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>vention and new technology <strong>in</strong> shap<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
future<br />
Use <strong>of</strong> many discipl<strong>in</strong>es to develop the “solution”<br />
Need for eng<strong>in</strong>eers to work together, to communicate<br />
effectively<br />
Provide leadership <strong>in</strong> technical endeavors<br />
Need to work efficiently, with<strong>in</strong> resources and/or<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>itably
New characteristics <strong>of</strong> context <strong>of</strong><br />
eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g pr<strong>of</strong>ession<br />
A change from mastery <strong>of</strong> the environment to stewardship <strong>of</strong><br />
the environment<br />
Globalization and <strong>in</strong>ternational competition<br />
Fragmentation and geographic dispersion <strong>of</strong> eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g<br />
activities<br />
The <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly human-centered nature <strong>of</strong> eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g<br />
practice<br />
Increas<strong>in</strong>g emphasis on service-oriented eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustries<br />
Rapid evolution <strong>of</strong> technologies, so, future eng<strong>in</strong>eers also need<br />
to be quick learners<br />
companies want their new hires to be productive from the first<br />
day on the job.
Case <strong>of</strong> the Best Practice<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Waterloo, the flag <strong>of</strong><br />
Co-op op <strong>Education</strong><br />
Co-op op <strong>Education</strong> s<strong>in</strong>ce funded (1957-2008<br />
2008)<br />
50% <strong>of</strong> students participate(10000), switch<br />
between school and <strong>in</strong>dustry every 4 months<br />
3500 partners from <strong>in</strong>dustry<br />
High employment rate:97.6<br />
97.6%,<br />
high rate <strong>of</strong><br />
permanent position 91.1% vs. national wide<br />
average 77.9%)<br />
Most <strong>in</strong>novative univ. . <strong>in</strong> Canada, and most<br />
appreciated by <strong>in</strong>dustry (Bill Gates)