Advances in Rice Genetics - IRRI books - International Rice ...
Advances in Rice Genetics - IRRI books - International Rice ...
Advances in Rice Genetics - IRRI books - International Rice ...
Transform your PDFs into Flipbooks and boost your revenue!
Leverage SEO-optimized Flipbooks, powerful backlinks, and multimedia content to professionally showcase your products and significantly increase your reach.
<strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Rice</strong> <strong>Genetics</strong><br />
Edited by<br />
G.S. Khush, D.S. Brar, and B. Hardy<br />
2003<br />
INTERNATIONAL RICE RESEARCH INSTITUTE
The <strong>International</strong> <strong>Rice</strong> Research Institute (<strong>IRRI</strong>) was established<br />
<strong>in</strong> 1960 by the Ford and Rockefeller Foundations with<br />
the help and approval of the Government of the Philipp<strong>in</strong>es.<br />
Today <strong>IRRI</strong> is one of 15 nonprofit <strong>in</strong>ternational research<br />
centers supported by the Consultative Group on <strong>International</strong><br />
Agricultural Research (CGIAR – www.cgiar.org).<br />
<strong>IRRI</strong> receives support from several CGIAR members,<br />
<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g the World Bank, European Union, Asian Development<br />
Bank, <strong>International</strong> Fund for Agricultural Development,<br />
<strong>International</strong> Development Research Centre,<br />
Rockefeller Foundation, and agencies of the follow<strong>in</strong>g governments:<br />
Australia, Belgium, Canada, People’s Republic<br />
of Ch<strong>in</strong>a, Denmark, France, Germany, India, Islamic Republic<br />
of Iran, Japan, Republic of Korea, The Netherlands,<br />
Norway, Philipp<strong>in</strong>es, Spa<strong>in</strong>, Sweden, Switzerland, Thailand,<br />
United K<strong>in</strong>gdom, United States, and Vietnam.<br />
The responsibility for this publication rests with the<br />
<strong>International</strong> <strong>Rice</strong> Research Institute.<br />
Suggested citation:<br />
Khush GS, Brar DS, Hardy B, editors. 2003. <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong><br />
rice genetics. Supplement to <strong>Rice</strong> genetics IV. Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs<br />
of the Fourth <strong>International</strong> <strong>Rice</strong> <strong>Genetics</strong> Symposium, 22-<br />
27 October 2000, Los Baños, Philipp<strong>in</strong>es. Los Baños (Philipp<strong>in</strong>es):<br />
<strong>International</strong> <strong>Rice</strong> Research Institute. 642 p.<br />
Copyright <strong>International</strong> <strong>Rice</strong> Research Institute 2003<br />
Mail<strong>in</strong>g address: DAPO Box 7777, Metro Manila,<br />
Philipp<strong>in</strong>es<br />
Phone: +63 (2) 580-5600, 845-0563,<br />
844-3351 to 53<br />
Fax: +63 (2) 580-5699, 891-1292,<br />
845-0606<br />
Email: irri@cgiar.org<br />
Home page: www.irri.org<br />
<strong>Rice</strong>web: www.riceweb.org<br />
<strong>Rice</strong> Knowledge Bank:<br />
www.riceknowledgebank.org<br />
Courier address: Suite 1009, Pacific<br />
Bank Build<strong>in</strong>g 6776 Ayala Avenue,<br />
Makati City, Philipp<strong>in</strong>es<br />
Tel. (63-2) 891-1236, 891-1174,<br />
891-1258, 891-1303<br />
Cover design: Juan Lazaro IV<br />
Pr<strong>in</strong>t production coord<strong>in</strong>ator: George R. Reyes<br />
Layout and design: Ariel Paelmo<br />
Figures and illustrations: Ariel Paelmo<br />
ISBN 971-22-0199-6
Contents<br />
PREFACE<br />
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS<br />
xvii<br />
xix<br />
<strong>Genetics</strong> and breed<strong>in</strong>g of agronomic traits<br />
Compar<strong>in</strong>g agronomic performance of breed<strong>in</strong>g populations derived 3<br />
from anther culture and s<strong>in</strong>gle-seed descent <strong>in</strong> rice<br />
H.P. Moon, K.H. Kang, I.S. Choi, O.Y. Jeong, H.C. Hong, S.H. Choi,<br />
and H.C. Choi<br />
<strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> breed<strong>in</strong>g salt-tolerant rice varieties 5<br />
B. Mishra, R.K. S<strong>in</strong>gh, and D. Senadhira<br />
Breed<strong>in</strong>g for salt tolerance <strong>in</strong> rice 8<br />
R. Ansari, A. Shereen, S.M. Alam, T.J. Flowers, and A.R.Yeo<br />
Genetic analysis and prediction of heterosis 10<br />
C.H.M. Vijayakumar, M. Ilyas Ahmed, B.C. Viraktamath, M.S. Ramesha,<br />
and A. Jauhar Ali<br />
Relationship of parental genetic diversity with heterosis <strong>in</strong> two-l<strong>in</strong>e and three-l<strong>in</strong>e 12<br />
Philipp<strong>in</strong>e rice hybrids<br />
L.S. Moreno, S.A. Ordoñez, I.A. Dela Cruz, and E.D. Redoña<br />
Stable high-yield<strong>in</strong>g ability of japonica-<strong>in</strong>dica hybrid rice 15<br />
T. Takita, K. Terashima, N. Yokogami, and T. Kataoka<br />
Inheritance of fertility restoration of WA cytoplasm <strong>in</strong> sodic-tolerant rice hybrids 17<br />
A. Jauhar Ali, S.E. Na<strong>in</strong>a Mohammed, R. Rajagopalan,<br />
and C.H.M. Vijayakumar<br />
Genetic analysis of temperature-sensitive genic male sterility <strong>in</strong> rice 19<br />
A. Jauhar Ali, S.E. Na<strong>in</strong>a Mohammed, R. Rajagopalan,<br />
and C.H.M. Vijayakumar<br />
Complexity of <strong>in</strong>heritance of thermosensitive genic male sterility <strong>in</strong> rice 20<br />
R.B. Li and M.P. Pandey<br />
Characteriz<strong>in</strong>g tropical japonicas with wide compatibility based on isozyme 24<br />
pattern <strong>in</strong> rice<br />
S.S. Malik, D.S. Brar, and G.S. Khush<br />
Effects of cytoplasm and cytoplasm-nucleus <strong>in</strong>teraction <strong>in</strong> breed<strong>in</strong>g japonica rice 27<br />
D. Tao, F. Hu, G. Yang, J. Yang, P. Xu, J. Li, C. Ye, and L. Dai<br />
Genetic analysis of hybrid breakdown <strong>in</strong> a japonica/<strong>in</strong>dica cross of rice 30<br />
T. Kubo and A. Yoshimura<br />
Induction and use of japonica rice mutant R917 with broad-spectrum 33<br />
resistance to blast<br />
M<strong>in</strong>gxian Zhang, Jianlong Xu, Rongt<strong>in</strong>g Luo, De Shi, and Zhikang Li<br />
Partial resistance to rice blast <strong>in</strong> the tropics 35<br />
H. Kato, H. Tsunematsu, L.A. Ebron, M.J.T. Yanoria, D.M. Mercado,<br />
and G.S. Khush<br />
Develop<strong>in</strong>g near-isogenic l<strong>in</strong>es for blast resistance <strong>in</strong> two genotypes 36<br />
of <strong>in</strong>dica rice, IR24 and IR49830-7-1-2-2<br />
L.A. Ebron, Y. Fukuta, H. Kato, T. Imbe, M.J.T. Yanoria, H. Tsunematsu,<br />
D.L. Adorada, and G.S. Khush<br />
Contents<br />
iii
Develop<strong>in</strong>g near-isogenic l<strong>in</strong>es for rice blast resistance 39<br />
H. Tsunematsu, M.J.T. Yanoria, L.A. Ebron, N. Hayashi, I. Ando,<br />
D.M. Mercado, H. Kato, Y. Fukuta, and T. Imbe<br />
Improv<strong>in</strong>g field resistance to blast and eat<strong>in</strong>g quality <strong>in</strong> Japanese rice varieties 41<br />
Y. Uehara<br />
Inheritance of resistance to bacterial blight <strong>in</strong> rice 45<br />
D. Sharma<br />
Genetic analysis of resistance to bacterial blight <strong>in</strong> rice 46<br />
K.-S. Lee and G.S. Khush<br />
Breed<strong>in</strong>g bacterial blight–resistant rice cultivars at the Philipp<strong>in</strong>e <strong>Rice</strong> 49<br />
Research Institute<br />
R.E. Tabien and L.S. Sebastian<br />
Inheritance and allelic relationships of rice gall midge resistance genes 51<br />
<strong>in</strong> some new donors<br />
Arv<strong>in</strong>d Kumar, M.N. Shrivastava, R.K. Sahu, B.C. Shukla,<br />
and S.K. Shrivastava<br />
<strong>Genetics</strong> of submergence tolerance <strong>in</strong> ra<strong>in</strong>fed rice: l<strong>in</strong>e × tester analysis 54<br />
O.N. S<strong>in</strong>gh, Sanjay S<strong>in</strong>gh, R.K. S<strong>in</strong>gh, and S. Sarkarung<br />
Diallel analysis for cold tolerance at the germ<strong>in</strong>ation stage <strong>in</strong> rice 56<br />
R.P. dela Cruz, S.C.K. Milach, L.C. Federizzi, A.F. de Rosso<br />
Inheritance of nitrogen efficiency under alum<strong>in</strong>um stress <strong>in</strong> upland rice l<strong>in</strong>es 58<br />
Y. Jagau, A. Makmur, H. Aswid<strong>in</strong>noor, and S.H. Sutjahjo<br />
Genetic mechanism of variegation of a chlorophyll mutant orig<strong>in</strong>ated from 60<br />
the cross between distantly related rice varieties<br />
M. Maekawa and K. Noda<br />
Major genes controll<strong>in</strong>g spikelet number per panicle <strong>in</strong> rice 63<br />
R. Mishra and M.P. Janoria<br />
Genetic relationship between red pericarp and fertility restoration <strong>in</strong> rice 64<br />
S. Leenakumari, R. Gopakumar, and G. Uma<br />
Genetic analysis of morphological and related taxonomic traits <strong>in</strong> rice 67<br />
Qian Qian, He P<strong>in</strong>g, Zheng Xianwu, Chen Y<strong>in</strong>g, and Zhu Lihuang<br />
Performance of backcrossed doubled-haploid l<strong>in</strong>es of rice under contrast<strong>in</strong>g 69<br />
moisture regimes: root system and gra<strong>in</strong> yield components<br />
M. Toorchi, H.E. Shashidhar, and S. Hittalmani<br />
Developmental genetics of <strong>in</strong>ternodal elongation <strong>in</strong> float<strong>in</strong>g rice 72<br />
T. Jishi and Y. Sano<br />
Genetic divergence <strong>in</strong> photoperiod-<strong>in</strong>sensitive autumn rice germplasm 74<br />
of northeast India<br />
R.P. Borkakati, P. Borah, and P.C. Deka<br />
The relationship between number of nitrogen-fix<strong>in</strong>g rhizobacteria and growth 77<br />
pattern of rice varieties<br />
K. Hirano, T. Sugiyama, A. Kosugi, I. Nioh, T. Asai, and H. Nakai<br />
Genotype by environment <strong>in</strong>teraction across normal and delayed plant<strong>in</strong>g 79<br />
<strong>in</strong> ra<strong>in</strong>fed lowland rice environments of eastern India<br />
S. S<strong>in</strong>gh, S. Sarkarung, O.N. S<strong>in</strong>gh, R.K. S<strong>in</strong>gh,<br />
V.P. S<strong>in</strong>gh, and C.B. Pandey<br />
Us<strong>in</strong>g rice cultivar LGC-1 as a dietary food for patients with kidney disease 83<br />
M. Nishimura, N. Horisue, T. Imbe, M. Sakai, and M. Kusaba<br />
Characterization of a rice mutant show<strong>in</strong>g an abnormal morphology 85<br />
T. Kawai and H. Kitano<br />
Genetic diversity, evolution, and alien <strong>in</strong>trogression<br />
RAPD variation <strong>in</strong> carbonized rice aged 13,010 and 17,310 years 89<br />
H.S. Suh, J.H. Cho, Y.J. Lee, and M.H. Heu<br />
Diphyletic orig<strong>in</strong> of cultivated rice based on genetic analysis and archaeology 91<br />
Y.I. Sato, S. Yamanaka, and Y. Fukuta<br />
Evolutionary and molecular genetic studies at the waxy locus <strong>in</strong> cultivated 94<br />
rice and wild relatives<br />
S. Yamanaka, I. Nakamura, H. Nakai, and Y.I. Sato<br />
iv<br />
<strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
PCR-RFLP analysis of cpDNA and mtDNA <strong>in</strong> Oryza 96<br />
L.J. Chen, D.S. Lee, and H.S. Suh<br />
Evolutionary significance of varietal groups resistant to bacterial leaf blight <strong>in</strong> rice 99<br />
T. Ogawa, N. Endo, G.A. Busto Jr., R.E. Tabien, S. Taura, and G.S. Khush<br />
<strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice chromosome research, 1995-2000 103<br />
K. Fukui<br />
Achievements <strong>in</strong> rice cytogenetics 106<br />
Hs<strong>in</strong>-Kan Wu and M<strong>in</strong>g-Hong Gu<br />
Advanced cytogenetics <strong>in</strong> Oryzeae 109<br />
S.A. Jackson, Z. Cheng, J. Jiang, and R.L. Phillips<br />
Cell-cycle synchronization and flow karyotyp<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> rice 111<br />
J.H. Lee, Y.S. Chung, D.H. Kim, K.Y. Kim, J.W. Kim, O.C. Kwon,<br />
and J.S. Sh<strong>in</strong><br />
High-resolution fluorescence <strong>in</strong> situ hybridization (FISH) for gene mapp<strong>in</strong>g 115<br />
and molecular analysis of rice chromosomes<br />
N. Ohmido and K. Fukui<br />
Analysis of meiosis <strong>in</strong> rice after mutagenic treatment 117<br />
N.A. Khailenko, A.I. Sedlovskiy, and L.N. Tyup<strong>in</strong>a<br />
Genomic relationships of the AA genome Oryza species 118<br />
B.R. Lu, M.E.B. Naredo, A.B. Juliano, and M.T. Jackson<br />
Characteriz<strong>in</strong>g hybrid and backcross derivatives of O. sativa × O. m<strong>in</strong>uta 122<br />
us<strong>in</strong>g species probes<br />
S.C. Tong, M.M. Clyde, Z. Zamrod, K. Narimah, and A.L. Mariam<br />
Genetic variation for perenniality <strong>in</strong> O. sativa/O. rufipogon derivatives 123<br />
E.J. Sacks, K.M. McNally, L. Liu, R. Lafitte, and T. Sta. Cruz<br />
Genetic population structures of Oryza glumaepatula and O. grandiglumis 126<br />
distributed <strong>in</strong> the Amazon flood area<br />
M. Akimoto and H. Morishima<br />
Oryza glumaepatula Steud. <strong>in</strong>trogression l<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong> rice: identification of genes 128<br />
for reproductive barriers<br />
Sobrizal, Y. Matsuzaki, K. Ikeda, P.L. Sanchez, K. Doi, H. Yasui,<br />
E.R. Angeles, G.S. Khush, and A. Yoshimura<br />
Advanced backcross analysis for transferr<strong>in</strong>g QTLs from O. rufipogon 130<br />
S.N. Ahn, K.H. Kang, J.P. Suh, S.J. Kwon, H.P. Moon, H.C. Choi,<br />
and S.R. McCouch<br />
Wild-QTL-allele effect <strong>in</strong> the background of japonica Nipponbare 133<br />
and <strong>in</strong>dica (IR36) cultivars<br />
T. Ishii, N.S. Bautista, K. Shimadzutsu, N. Kobayashi, N. Uchida,<br />
and O. Kamijima<br />
Trait-improv<strong>in</strong>g wild QTL alleles identified us<strong>in</strong>g advanced backcross QTL 135<br />
analysis from a cross between cultivated rice, Oryza sativa,<br />
and wild rice, O. rufipogon<br />
N.S. Bautista, K. Shimadzutsu, T. Teranishi, S. Takamatsu,<br />
N. Kobayashi, N. Uchida, O. Kamijima, and T. Ishii<br />
Us<strong>in</strong>g new alleles from wild rice Oryza rufipogon to improve cultivated 138<br />
rice (O. sativa) <strong>in</strong> Lat<strong>in</strong> America<br />
C.P. Martínez, P. Moncada, J. López, A. Almeida, G. Gallego, J. Borrero,<br />
M.C. Duque, W. Roca, S.R. McCouch, C. Bruzzone, and J. Tohme<br />
A new gene for resistance to bacterial blight from Oryza rufipogon 143<br />
Qi Zhang, S.C. L<strong>in</strong>g, B.Y. Zhao, C.L. Wang, W.C. Yang, K.J. Zhao,<br />
L.H. Zhu, D.Y. Li, and C.B. Chen<br />
Identify<strong>in</strong>g blast resistance <strong>in</strong> Oryza species and its <strong>in</strong>trogression 145<br />
<strong>in</strong>to U.S. rice cultivars<br />
G.C. Eizenga, T.H. Tai, F.N. Lee, and J.N. Rutger<br />
Evaluation of O. sativa × O. glaberrima–derived l<strong>in</strong>es us<strong>in</strong>g microsatellite markers 147<br />
M.-N. Ndjiondjop, J. Coburn, M.P. Jones, and S. McCouch<br />
Contents<br />
v
Genetic analysis of pollen sterility loci found <strong>in</strong> hybrid progeny between 149<br />
Oryza sativa and O. glabberima<br />
K. Doi, K. Taguchi, and A. Yoshimura<br />
A rhizomatous <strong>in</strong>dividual obta<strong>in</strong>ed from <strong>in</strong>terspecific BC 1<br />
F 1<br />
progenies 151<br />
between Oryza sativa and O. longistam<strong>in</strong>ata<br />
D. Tao, F. Hu, Y. Yang, P. Xu, J. Li, E. Sacks, K.L. McNally, and P. Sripichitt<br />
Identify<strong>in</strong>g late head<strong>in</strong>g genes <strong>in</strong> rice us<strong>in</strong>g Oryza glumaepatula <strong>in</strong>trogression 153<br />
l<strong>in</strong>es<br />
P.L. Sanchez, Sobrizal, K. Ikeda, H. Yasui, and A. Yoshimura<br />
Genetic variability of tolerance for iron toxicity <strong>in</strong> different species of Oryza 154<br />
and their derivatives<br />
R.D. Mendoza, J.A. Moliñawe, G.B. Gregorio, C.Q. Guerta, and D.S. Brar<br />
Identify<strong>in</strong>g subspecies-specific DNA markers <strong>in</strong> rice 157<br />
J.H. Ch<strong>in</strong> and H.J. Koh<br />
Identify<strong>in</strong>g RAPD markers to classify rice germplasm as <strong>in</strong>dica or japonica 160<br />
R.P. da Cruz, M.C.B. Lopes, S.C.K. Milach, and S.I.G. Lopes<br />
DNA f<strong>in</strong>gerpr<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g and phylogenetic analysis of Indian aromatic high-quality rice 162<br />
germplasm us<strong>in</strong>g panels of fluorescent-labeled microsatellite markers<br />
S. Ja<strong>in</strong>, S.E. Mitchell, R.K. Ja<strong>in</strong>, S. Kresovich, and S.R. McCouch<br />
F<strong>in</strong>gerpr<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g of Indian scented rice by RAPD markers 166<br />
T. Stobdan, V.K. Khanna, U.S. S<strong>in</strong>gh, and R.K. S<strong>in</strong>gh<br />
Relationship between heterosis <strong>in</strong> F 1<br />
hybrids and genetic similarity among 170<br />
parents as measured by RAPD, SSR, and co-ancestry analysis<br />
<strong>in</strong> japonica rice<br />
H.J. Koh, C.W. Park, and J.H. Lee<br />
Reproductive barriers between japonica and <strong>in</strong>dica crosses 173<br />
Y. Harushima, M. Nakagahra, M. Yano, T. Sasaki, and N. Kurata<br />
Genetic basis of F 1<br />
hybrid sterility and gamete formation <strong>in</strong> rice 176<br />
R. Suzuki, N. Sawamura, T. Okazawa, Kh<strong>in</strong>-Thidar, and Y. Sano<br />
Developmental cytology on gametic abortion caused by <strong>in</strong>duced 178<br />
complementary genes gal and d60 <strong>in</strong> japonica rice<br />
M. Tomita, H. Yamagata, and T. Tanisaka<br />
Molecular diversity and its geographical distribution <strong>in</strong> core rice germplasm 182<br />
W.J. Xu, S.B. Yu, S. S<strong>in</strong>gh, J. Dom<strong>in</strong>go, H. Bhandari, Y.F. Lu,<br />
C.H.M. Vijayakumar, P. Bagali, S. Sarkarung, S.S. Virmani,<br />
G.S. Khush, and Z.K. Li<br />
Phenotypic diversity <strong>in</strong> embryo mutants <strong>in</strong>duced by tissue culture <strong>in</strong> rice 184<br />
T. Iwamoto, S.K. Hong, H. Imai, M. Matsuoka, and H. Kitano<br />
Genetic diversity <strong>in</strong> Korean japonica rice cultivars 186<br />
S.J. Kwon, S.N. Ahn, C.I. Yang, H.C. Hong, Y.K. Kim, J.P. Suh,<br />
H.G. Hwang, H.P. Moon, and H.C. Choi<br />
Genetic diversity based on isozyme pattern of rice germplasm <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a 188<br />
S.X. Tang, Y.Z. Jiang, X.H. Wei, D.S. Brar, and G.S. Khush<br />
Differential patterns of isozyme loci of Adh and Ldh between upland 192<br />
and lowland rice varieties<br />
L.J. Chen, D.S. Lee, and H.S. Suh<br />
Genetic diversity <strong>in</strong> seed storage prote<strong>in</strong>s of Bangladeshi rice cultivars 194<br />
M.S. Jahan, T. Kumamaru, H. Satoh, and A. Hamid<br />
Genetic variation <strong>in</strong> storage prote<strong>in</strong> and storage endosperm starch <strong>in</strong> local 196<br />
rice cultivars of Myanmar<br />
P.P. Aung, T. Kumamaru, and H. Satoh<br />
Variation <strong>in</strong> seed storage prote<strong>in</strong>s of Pakistani rice germplasm 198<br />
S.U. Siddiqui, H. Satoh, and T. Kumamaru<br />
Genetic diversity <strong>in</strong> ra<strong>in</strong>fed lowland rice genotypes as detected by RAPD primers 200<br />
S. S<strong>in</strong>gh, S. Sarkarung, R.K. S<strong>in</strong>gh, O.N. S<strong>in</strong>gh, A.K. S<strong>in</strong>gh, V.P. S<strong>in</strong>gh,<br />
H.S. Bhandari, W. Xu, and Z. Li<br />
vi<br />
<strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
Marker-based estimation of coefficient of coancestry <strong>in</strong> rice 203<br />
D.A. Tabanao, L.S. Sebastian, A.L. Carpena, J.E. Hernandez,<br />
A.I.N. Gironella, and R.N. Bernardo<br />
Molecular cytological studies on a poly-egg rice mutant AP IV stra<strong>in</strong> 207<br />
Y. Lu and X. Liu<br />
Molecular markers, QTL mapp<strong>in</strong>g, and marker-assisted selection<br />
The application of molecular markers <strong>in</strong> rice 213<br />
M. Christopher, S. Garland, R. Re<strong>in</strong>ke, and R. Henry<br />
Application of molecular markers <strong>in</strong> rice breed<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the Mekong Delta 216<br />
of Vietnam<br />
Bui Chi Buu and Nguyen Thi Lang<br />
Convert<strong>in</strong>g rice RFLP markers to PCR-based markers by the dCAPS method 221<br />
T. Komori, T. Yamamoto, and N. Nitta<br />
DNA markers to assess genetic purity of rice hybrids 223<br />
R.V. Sonti, J. Yashitola, T. Thirumurugan, R.M. Sundaram,<br />
M.S. Ramesha, and N.P. Sarma<br />
RAPD markers from mitochondrial DNA can dist<strong>in</strong>guish male sterile and fertile 226<br />
cytoplasm <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>dica rice<br />
D.L. Hong, M. Ichii, Y. Ohara, C.M. Zhao, and S. Taketa<br />
F<strong>in</strong>e mapp<strong>in</strong>g of the F 1<br />
pollen sterility loci S-a and S-c <strong>in</strong> rice us<strong>in</strong>g 228<br />
PCR-based markers<br />
Guiquan Zhang and Zem<strong>in</strong> Zhang<br />
Map-based clon<strong>in</strong>g of the Hd1 gene controll<strong>in</strong>g photoperiod sensitivity <strong>in</strong> rice 230<br />
M. Ashikari, Y. Katayose, U. Yamanouchi, L. Monna, T. Fuse, T. Sasaki,<br />
and M. Yano<br />
Response of QTLs for head<strong>in</strong>g date <strong>in</strong> rice at different sites from tropical 233<br />
to temperate regions<br />
Y. Fukuta, S. Kobayashi, H. Tsunematsu, L.A. Ebron, H. Kato,<br />
T. Umemoto, S. Morita, T. Sato, T. Yamaya, T. Nagam<strong>in</strong>e,<br />
T. Fukuyama, H. Sasahara, I. Ashikawa, K. Tamura, H. Nemoto,<br />
H. Maeda, K. Hamamura, T. Ogata, Y. Matsue, K. Ichitani,<br />
and A. Takagi<br />
Mapp<strong>in</strong>g quantitative trait loci controll<strong>in</strong>g head<strong>in</strong>g date <strong>in</strong> rice 238<br />
K. Fuj<strong>in</strong>o, T. Sato, H. Kiuchi, H. Kikuchi, Y. Nonoue, Y. Takeuchi,<br />
S.Y. L<strong>in</strong>, and M. Yano<br />
QTL analysis for head<strong>in</strong>g date us<strong>in</strong>g recomb<strong>in</strong>ant <strong>in</strong>bred l<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong> rice 240<br />
M. Oda, H. Yasui, and A. Yoshimura<br />
Molecular mapp<strong>in</strong>g of Hwc-2, one of the complementary hybrid weakness 243<br />
genes <strong>in</strong> rice<br />
K. Ichitani, Y. Fukuta, K. Koba, S. Taura, and M. Sato<br />
Molecular markers for detect<strong>in</strong>g bacterial blight resistance genes 245<br />
<strong>in</strong> ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>er l<strong>in</strong>es of rice hybrids<br />
L. Bor<strong>in</strong>es, E. Redoña, B. Porter, F. White, C. Vera Cruz, and H. Leung<br />
Identify<strong>in</strong>g major genes and QTLs for field resistance to neck blast <strong>in</strong> rice 248<br />
S. Hittalmani, Sr<strong>in</strong>ivasachary, P. Bagali, and H.E. Shashidhar<br />
Mapp<strong>in</strong>g QTLs for partial resistance to blast <strong>in</strong> rice 250<br />
M.Z.I. Talukder, C. Leifert, and A.H. Price<br />
Marker-assisted selection for transferr<strong>in</strong>g resistance to blast <strong>in</strong> high-yield<strong>in</strong>g 253<br />
but susceptible Jyothi<br />
L. Babujee, B. Venkatesan, S. Kavitha, S.S. Gnanamanickam,<br />
S. Leenakumari, S. McCouch, and S. Leong<br />
Us<strong>in</strong>g microsatellite markers to select blast resistance <strong>in</strong> U.S. rice breed<strong>in</strong>g l<strong>in</strong>es 255<br />
R.G. Fjellstrom, C. Conaway, W.D. Park, M.A. Marchetti, and A.M. McClung<br />
Mapp<strong>in</strong>g a recessive gene conferr<strong>in</strong>g resistance to rice yellow mottle virus 257<br />
M.N. Ndjiondjop-Nzenkam, L. Albar, D. Fargette, C. Brugidou,<br />
M.P. Jones, and A. Ghesquiere<br />
Contents<br />
vii
Partial resistance to rice yellow mottle virus: QTL identification, genetic model, 259<br />
and QTL efficiency analysis after marker-assisted <strong>in</strong>trogression<br />
N. Ahmadi, L. Albar, G. Pressoir, M. Lorieux, D. Fargette ,<br />
and A. Ghesquière<br />
Construct<strong>in</strong>g l<strong>in</strong>kage maps of brown planthopper resistance genes Bph1, bph2, 263<br />
and Bph9 on rice chromosome 12<br />
H. Murai, P.N. Sharma, K. Murata, Z. Hashimoto, Y. Ketipearachi,<br />
T. Shimizu, S. Takumi, N. Mori, S. Kawasaki, and C. Nakamura<br />
Molecular mapp<strong>in</strong>g and marker-aided selection of a gene conferr<strong>in</strong>g 265<br />
resistance to an Indian biotype of brown planthopper <strong>in</strong> rice<br />
K.K. Jena, I.C. Pasalu, Y. Varalaxmi, Y. Kondala Rao, K. Krishnaiah,<br />
G. Kochert, and G.S. Khush<br />
Mapp<strong>in</strong>g QTLs for brown planthopper (BPH) resistance <strong>in</strong>trogressed from 268<br />
Oryza offic<strong>in</strong>alis <strong>in</strong> rice<br />
H. Hirabayashi, R. Kaji, M. Okamoto, T. Ogawa, D.S. Brar,<br />
E.R. Angeles, and G.S. Khush<br />
RFLP mapp<strong>in</strong>g of antibiosis to rice green leafhopper 270<br />
M. Kadowaki, A. Yoshimura, and H. Yasui<br />
Mapp<strong>in</strong>g of a gene ovicidal to whitebacked planthopper Sogatella furcifera 272<br />
Horváth <strong>in</strong> rice<br />
M. Yamasaki, A. Yoshimura, and H. Yasui<br />
Molecular marker association for yellow stem borer resistance <strong>in</strong> rice 274<br />
A. Selvi, P.S. Shanmugasundaram, J.A.J. Raja, and S. Mohankumar<br />
Chromosome blocks are <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> adaptive gene complexes 276<br />
<strong>in</strong> rice landraces<br />
B.V. Ford-Lloyd, P.S. Virk, M.T. Jackson, and H.J. Newbury<br />
Drought tolerance <strong>in</strong> rice: QTLs, marker-assisted selection, and environmental 279<br />
<strong>in</strong>teractions<br />
A. Price<br />
Identify<strong>in</strong>g traits and molecular markers associated with components 282<br />
of drought tolerance <strong>in</strong> rice<br />
H.E. Shashidhar, N. Sharma, M. Ashoka, V. Rao, M. Toorchi,<br />
and S. Hittalmani<br />
Genes/QTLs affect<strong>in</strong>g flood tolerance <strong>in</strong> rice 284<br />
K. Sripongpankul, G.B.L. Posa, D. Senadhira, N. Huang, D.S. Brar,<br />
G.S. Khush, and Z. Li<br />
Mapp<strong>in</strong>g genes that control traits related to submergence tolerance <strong>in</strong> rice 287<br />
M. Seanglew, A. Vanavichit, S. Tragoonrung, and S. Sarkarung<br />
Identify<strong>in</strong>g QTLs for cold tolerance–related traits <strong>in</strong> a Korean weedy rice 291<br />
J.P. Suh, S.N. Ahn, H.S. Suh, H.P. Moon, and H.C. Choi<br />
Mapp<strong>in</strong>g QTLs for salt tolerance <strong>in</strong> rice 294<br />
Nguyen Thi Lang, S. Masood, S. Yanagihara, and Bui Chi Buu<br />
Quantitative trait loci analysis of alum<strong>in</strong>um tolerance <strong>in</strong> rice 298<br />
V.T. Nguyen, H.T. Nguyen, B.T. Le, T.D. Le, and A.H. Paterson<br />
Mapp<strong>in</strong>g QTLs for ozone resistance <strong>in</strong> rice 302<br />
J.K. Sohn, J.J. Lee, K.M. Kim, Y.S. Kwon, and M.Y. Eun<br />
F<strong>in</strong>e mapp<strong>in</strong>g of genes controll<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>termediate amylose content <strong>in</strong> rice 304<br />
us<strong>in</strong>g bulked segregant analysis<br />
J. Lanceras, S. Tragoonrung, A. Vanavichit, and O. Naivikul<br />
Association between amylose content and a microsatellite marker across 307<br />
exotic rice germplasm<br />
C.J. Bergman, R.G. Fjellstrom, and A.M. McClung<br />
Molecular genetic analysis of quantitative trait loci related to rice gra<strong>in</strong> quality 309<br />
J.H. Lee, Y.S. Cho, K.H. Jung, M.T. Song, S.J. Yang, H.Y. Kim,<br />
and H.C. Choi<br />
Leaf senescence of a newly <strong>in</strong>duced stay-green mutant and mapp<strong>in</strong>g of 312<br />
the gene <strong>in</strong> rice<br />
K.W. Cha, Y.J. Won, and H.J. Koh<br />
viii<br />
<strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
Mapp<strong>in</strong>g the rt (root growth-<strong>in</strong>hibit<strong>in</strong>g) gene of rice by RFLP markers 314<br />
M. Miwa, Y. Inukai, K. Satoh, M. Itoh, Y. Katayama, M. Ashikari,<br />
M. Matsuoka, and H. Kitano<br />
Tagg<strong>in</strong>g and mapp<strong>in</strong>g of a new elongated-uppermost-<strong>in</strong>ternode gene—eui2(t) 317<br />
—us<strong>in</strong>g AFLP, RFLP, and SSR techniques<br />
S.L. Yang, R.C. Yang, X.P. Qu, H.L. Ma, Q.Q. Zhang, S.B. Zhang,<br />
and R.H. Huang<br />
Map-based clon<strong>in</strong>g of Ps1, a gene for pollen abortion <strong>in</strong> rice 319<br />
S.Y. L<strong>in</strong>, T. Takashi, T. Sasaki, and M. Yano<br />
Sequence-tagged site marker diagnostics for the CMS fertility-restor<strong>in</strong>g 321<br />
gene Rf-3 <strong>in</strong> rice<br />
Nguyen Thi Lang, S.S. Virmani, N. Huang, D.S. Brar, Z. Li,<br />
and B.C. Buu<br />
<strong>Genetics</strong> and mapp<strong>in</strong>g of the nuclear fertility restorer gene for Honglian-type 324<br />
cytoplasmic male sterility <strong>in</strong> rice<br />
Y<strong>in</strong>guo Zhu, Q<strong>in</strong>gyang Huang, Yuq<strong>in</strong>g He, and Runchun J<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Molecular mapp<strong>in</strong>g and identification of QTLs for some agronomic traits <strong>in</strong> rice 326<br />
S.J. Kwon, S.N. Ahn, J.P. Suh, Y.C. Cho, H.C. Hong, Y.G. Kim,<br />
H.G. Hwang, H.P. Moon, and H.C. Choi<br />
Mapp<strong>in</strong>g QTLs associated with tolerance for enhanced ultraviolet-B 328<br />
radiation <strong>in</strong> rice<br />
T. Sato, Y. Fukuta, M. Yano, and T. Kumagai<br />
Genetic systems of cross-<strong>in</strong>compatibility as pre- and postfertilization 330<br />
barriers <strong>in</strong> rice<br />
K. Matsubara, R. Suzuki, Kh<strong>in</strong>-Tidar, K. Okuno, and Y. Sano<br />
Relationship between genetic distance and heterosis under different fertilizer 332<br />
applications <strong>in</strong> rice<br />
Z.Z. Piao, Y.I. Cho, and H.J. Koh<br />
Isolat<strong>in</strong>g and characteriz<strong>in</strong>g molecular markers associated with seedl<strong>in</strong>g-stage 336<br />
cold tolerance <strong>in</strong> rice<br />
K.M. Kim, I.K. Chung, T.S. Kwak, and J.K. Sohn<br />
QTL analysis for discoloration of flag leaves dur<strong>in</strong>g the ripen<strong>in</strong>g period <strong>in</strong> rice 338<br />
M. Obara, Y. Fukuta, M. Yano, T. Yamaya, and T. Sato<br />
QTL analysis of root vitality <strong>in</strong> a doubled-haploid population derived 340<br />
from anther culture of <strong>in</strong>dica/japonica rice<br />
Teng Sheng, Zeng Dali, Zheng Xianwu, K. Yasufumi, Qian Qian,<br />
and Zhu Lihuang<br />
Genomics<br />
<strong>Rice</strong> functional genomics via cDNA microarray analysis 345<br />
J. Yazaki, N. Kishimoto, F. Fujii, K. Nakamura, J. Wu, K. Yamamoto,<br />
K. Sakata, T. Sasaki, and S. Kikuchi<br />
Develop<strong>in</strong>g genomics approaches for crop trait improvement 350<br />
H. Sakai, G. Taram<strong>in</strong>o, N. Nagasawa, Guo-Hua Miao, J. Vogel,<br />
and S. T<strong>in</strong>gey<br />
A gene mach<strong>in</strong>e for rice 352<br />
N.M. Upadhyaya, X.-R. Zhou, Q.-H. Zhu, A. Eamens, K. Ramm,<br />
L. Wu, R. Sivakumar, S. Kumar, K.K. Narayanan, G. Thomas,<br />
T. Kato, D.-W. Yun, W.J. Peacock, and E.S. Dennis<br />
Comparative genomics <strong>in</strong> the Oryzeae 355<br />
S.A. Jackson, J.W. Lilly, R.L. Phillips, W.C. Kennard, and R.A. Porter<br />
T-DNA as a potential <strong>in</strong>sertional mutagen <strong>in</strong> rice 358<br />
C. Sallaud, D. Meynard, J.P. Brizard, M. Bès, C. Gay, M. Raynal,<br />
E. Bourgeois, H. Hoge, M. Delseny, and E. Guiderdoni<br />
New Ac/Ds-based constructs for efficient gene and enhancer trapp<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> rice 362<br />
X.-R. Zhou, K. Ramm, L. Wu, R. Sivakumar, E.S. Dennis,<br />
and N.M. Upahdyaya<br />
Contents<br />
ix
Ac/Ds-mediated gene trap systems for functional genomics <strong>in</strong> rice 365<br />
B.I. Je, C.M. Kim, Su Hyun Park, Sung Han Park, Y.J. Na, J.J. Lee,<br />
B.G. Oh, N.M. Hee, G.H. Yi, H.Y. Kim, and C.D. Han<br />
A rice retrotransposon, Tos17, as a tool for gene tagg<strong>in</strong>g 367<br />
K. Murata, A. Miyao, K. Tanaka, M. Yamazaki, S. Takeda, K. Abe,<br />
K. Onosato, A. Miyazaki, Y. Yamashita, T. Sasaki, and H. Hirochika<br />
Structural polymorphism found <strong>in</strong> RMU1 (rice mutator class 1) transposable 369<br />
elements <strong>in</strong> rice<br />
K. Miura, R. Ishikawa, Y. Miyashita, M. Senda, S. Akada, T. Harada,<br />
and M. Niizeki<br />
Isolat<strong>in</strong>g and characteriz<strong>in</strong>g cold-responsive gene-trapped l<strong>in</strong>es from rice 370<br />
S.C. Lee, S.H. Kim, S.J. Kim, H.S. Choi, M.Y. Lee, J.Y. Kim, K. Lee,<br />
S.H. Jeon, J.S. Jeon, G. An, and S.R. Kim<br />
Construct<strong>in</strong>g a physical map of the rice genome 372<br />
A.C. Sanchez, B. Fu, R. Maghirang, C. Aqu<strong>in</strong>o, J. Mendoza,<br />
J. Talag, S. Yu, J.R. Dom<strong>in</strong>go, K.L. McNally, P. Bagali,<br />
G.S. Khush, and Z.K. Li<br />
Centromere structure of rice chromosome 5 375<br />
K.I. Nonomura and N. Kurata<br />
Genic <strong>in</strong>teraction between mutant genes related to morphogenesis 377<br />
of panicle and spikelet <strong>in</strong> rice<br />
I. Takamure, T. Aida, and S. Niikura<br />
Oryzabase: an <strong>in</strong>tegrated rice science database 380<br />
Y. Yamazaki, A. Yoshimura, Y. Nagato, and N. Kurata<br />
<strong>Rice</strong>Genes 5.0: an onl<strong>in</strong>e genomic resource for the rice community 384<br />
A.M. Baldo, G.A. DeClerck, T.G. Cargioli, I.V. Yap, C.M. Larota,<br />
S. Cart<strong>in</strong>hour, and S.R. McCouch<br />
CD-ROM for PC version of <strong>Rice</strong>Genes, a rice-specific ACEDB 386<br />
Y.C. Sh<strong>in</strong>, T.H. Lee, M.Y. Eun, and B.H. Nahm<br />
Perform<strong>in</strong>g l<strong>in</strong>e × tester analysis with the SAS ® system 389<br />
V.I. Bartolome and G.B. Gregorio<br />
Gene isolation and function<br />
One super-mutator transposon family found <strong>in</strong> rice 395<br />
R. Ishikawa, K. Miura, M. Ashida, M. Senda, S. Akada, T. Harada,<br />
and M. Niizeki<br />
A maize MuDR-like tranposable element transcribed <strong>in</strong> the rice genome 397<br />
S. Yoshida, N. Asakura, R. Ootani, and C. Nakamura<br />
Transcriptional analysis of the Mu-like element Tnr2 <strong>in</strong> rice 400<br />
F. Myouga, S. Tsuchimoto, H. Ohtsubo, and E. Ohtsubo<br />
Chloroplast target<strong>in</strong>g signal regulates transgene expression <strong>in</strong> rice 403<br />
I.C. Jang, K.H. Lee, B.H. Nahm, and J.K. Kim<br />
Isolation and functional characterization of the DREB family of genes <strong>in</strong> rice 406<br />
J.G. Dubouzet, Y. Sakuma, E.G. Dubouzet, S. Miura,<br />
K. Yamaguchi-Sh<strong>in</strong>ozaki, and K. Sh<strong>in</strong>ozaki<br />
Characterization and expression of rice monosaccharide transporter 409<br />
genes, OsMST1–3<br />
K. Toyofuku, T. Takeda, J. Yamaguchi, and M. Kasahara<br />
Functional analysis of R2R3-Myb genes <strong>in</strong> rice 411<br />
J.W. Lee, S.K. Sung, S.K. Yi, and G. An<br />
Functional analysis of MADS-box genes expressed preferentially <strong>in</strong> vegetative 414<br />
tissues<br />
S.Y. Lee, S.H. Jang, S.H. Jun, and G.H. An<br />
Functional analysis of prote<strong>in</strong> phosphatase 2C <strong>in</strong> rice 416<br />
K. Yang, D.H. Jeong, and G. An<br />
Functions of mitochondrial aldehyde dehydrogenase <strong>in</strong> rice under 418<br />
anaerobic conditions<br />
M. Nakazono, Y. Li, H. Tsuji, N. Tsutsumi, and A. Hirai<br />
x<br />
<strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
Identification of differentially expressed genes dur<strong>in</strong>g disease resistance 421<br />
response from rice by cDNA arrays<br />
B<strong>in</strong> Zhou, Kaiman Peng, Zhaohui Chu, Ship<strong>in</strong>g Wang, and Qifa Zhang<br />
<strong>Rice</strong> transcript RIM2 accumulates <strong>in</strong> response to Magnaporthe grisea 423<br />
and its predicted prote<strong>in</strong> shares similarity with prote<strong>in</strong>s encoded<br />
by CACTA transposons<br />
J.X. Dong, H.T. Dong, Z.H. He, and D.B. Li<br />
Chimeric receptor k<strong>in</strong>ases for plant disease resistance eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> rice 425<br />
Zuhua He, Zhiyong Wang, Qun Zhu, Jianm<strong>in</strong>g Li, C. Lamb, J. Chory,<br />
and P. Ronald<br />
Jasmonic acid- and salicylic acid-mediated defense signal transduction <strong>in</strong> rice 429<br />
Y. Yang, M. Qi, M.-W. Lee, and L. Xiong<br />
Alternative splic<strong>in</strong>g bestows capacity for nuclear expression and mitochondrial 431<br />
target<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> rice<br />
K. Kadowaki and N. Kubo<br />
Transferr<strong>in</strong>g the ribosomal prote<strong>in</strong> S10 gene from the mitochondrion to 434<br />
the nucleus <strong>in</strong> rice<br />
N. Kubo, X. Jordana, K. Harada, and K. Kadowaki<br />
Hypothetical model of genetic regulation of the glutel<strong>in</strong> biosynthesis pathway 436<br />
Y. Takemoto, M. Ogawa, T. Kumamaru, T.W. Okita, and H. Satoh<br />
The alk locus controls amylopect<strong>in</strong> structure and starch synthase 439<br />
activity <strong>in</strong> rice<br />
T. Umemoto, M. Yano, H. Satoh, A. Shomura, K. Okamoto,<br />
K. Kobayashi, and Y. Nakamura<br />
Biosynthesis of rice S-poor and S-rich prolam<strong>in</strong>s is regulated by 441<br />
an <strong>in</strong>dependent genetic system<br />
H. Matsusaka, T. Kumamaru, M. Ogawa, and H. Satoh<br />
Differential expression of rice genes <strong>in</strong> response to iron 444<br />
L. Hillebrand, P.S. Carmona, and M.G. Moraes<br />
Isolat<strong>in</strong>g and characteriz<strong>in</strong>g a cDNA encod<strong>in</strong>g the iron-storage prote<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice 446<br />
Kwon Kyoo Kang and Yong Gu Cho<br />
Identify<strong>in</strong>g a novel superoxide dismutase isoform: a biological marker 449<br />
for evaluat<strong>in</strong>g drought-tolerant varieties of rice<br />
K.N. S<strong>in</strong>gh and S. Sadasivam<br />
Induc<strong>in</strong>g dehydration tolerance <strong>in</strong> rice by regulated expression of genes 451<br />
for transcription factors<br />
S.J. Oh, E.H. Kim, S.Y. Kim, S.I. Song, S. Daughhetee, J.K. Kim,<br />
and B.H. Nahm<br />
Molecular clon<strong>in</strong>g of the salt-responsive gene <strong>in</strong> rice 454<br />
M. Arumugam Pillai and S. Yanagihara<br />
Developmental changes of phyllochron <strong>in</strong> the life cycle of rice 457<br />
Y. Itoh, S. Sato, and Y. Sano<br />
Effect of starch-branch<strong>in</strong>g enzyme IIb on amylopect<strong>in</strong> structure 459<br />
and gelat<strong>in</strong>ization property<br />
A. Nishi, Y. Nakamura, and H. Satoh<br />
Analyses of sugar transport via the vascular system <strong>in</strong> rice 462<br />
C. Matsukura, T. Saitoh, T. Hirose, R. Ohsugi, and J. Yamaguchi<br />
Alteration of rice floral organ identity by ectopic expression of the rice 465<br />
MADS-box gene<br />
S. Lee, J.S. Jeon, Y.H. Moon, Y.Y. Chung, and G. An<br />
Expression analyses of the OsPNH1 gene <strong>in</strong> rice leaf development 468<br />
A. Nishimura, M. Ito, H. Kitano, and M. Matsuoka<br />
Gene expression pattern of cell division/elongation factors <strong>in</strong> rice dwarf mutants 470<br />
H. Tob<strong>in</strong>a, S. Uozu, M. Matsuoka, H. Kitano, and K. Hattori<br />
Expressed sequence tag analysis of develop<strong>in</strong>g seed coat and characterization 473<br />
of the Ran gene <strong>in</strong> rice<br />
M.J. Han, S.H. Jun, S.R. Kim, and G. An<br />
Contents<br />
xi
Complex organization of the rice Purple leaf locus <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> tissue-specific 475<br />
accumulation of anthocyan<strong>in</strong><br />
W. Sakamoto, M. Murata, and M. Maekawa<br />
Slender rice mutant is caused by null mutation of the SLR gene, an ortholog of 478<br />
the height- regulat<strong>in</strong>g gene GAI/RGA/RHT/D8<br />
A. Ikeda, M. Ueguchi-Tanaka, Y. Sonoda, H. Kitano, Y. Futsuhara,<br />
M. Matsuoka, and J. Yamaguchi<br />
Characteriz<strong>in</strong>g a slender mutant with constitutive gibberell<strong>in</strong>-response <strong>in</strong> rice 480<br />
A. Ikeda, H. Kitano, Y. Sonoda, Y. Futsuhara, and J. Yamaguchi<br />
Molecular basis of 5-methyltryptophan-resistant rice 482<br />
Y. Ishikawa, H. Kisaka, M. Kisaka, H.-Y. Lee, A. Kanno, and T. Kameya<br />
Positional clon<strong>in</strong>g of candidates for Xa4 <strong>in</strong> rice 485<br />
Wenxue Zhai, Wenm<strong>in</strong>g Wang, Xianwu Zheng, and Lihuang Zhu<br />
Antifreeze prote<strong>in</strong>s: a molecular approach for develop<strong>in</strong>g cold-tolerant rice 488<br />
H.K. Khanna and G. Daggard<br />
Arrest<strong>in</strong>g sexual embryo development <strong>in</strong> rice us<strong>in</strong>g DMC1 and REE5 genes 490<br />
A. Kathiresan, G.S. Khush, and J. Bennett<br />
Assess<strong>in</strong>g the genetic propensity of rice for nodulation 492<br />
P.M. Reddy, J.K. Ladha, R.J. Hernandez-Oane, and V.S. Sreevidya<br />
Tissue culture and transformation<br />
Production of allohexaploid somatic hybrid plants by electrofus<strong>in</strong>g mesophyll 497<br />
protoplasts of Porteresia coarctata (Roxb.) Tateoka and cell<br />
suspension-derived protoplasts of Oryza sativa L.<br />
N.B. Jelodar, N.W. Blackhall, T.P.V. Hartman, D.S. Brar, G. Khush,<br />
M.R. Davey, E.C. Cock<strong>in</strong>g, and J.B. Power<br />
Enhanc<strong>in</strong>g sal<strong>in</strong>ity tolerance <strong>in</strong> rice us<strong>in</strong>g sexual and somatic hybrids 500<br />
of Oryza sativa and Porteresia coarctata<br />
E.C. Cock<strong>in</strong>g, N.W. Blackhall, M.R. Davey, J.B. Power, D.S. Brar,<br />
and G.S. Khush<br />
Protoplast fusion for develop<strong>in</strong>g novel sources of rice cytoplasmic male sterility 501<br />
N.W. Blackhall, J.P. Jotham, M.R. Davey, J.B. Power, and E.C. Cock<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Improved methods for anther and pollen culture <strong>in</strong> rice 503<br />
R. Gill, N. Kaur, A.S. S<strong>in</strong>dhu, T.S. Bharaj, and S.S. Gosal<br />
Androgenesis <strong>in</strong> aromatic rice hybrids 506<br />
M. Sakila, S.M. Ibrahim, A. Kalamani, S. Lakshmi Narayanan,<br />
N. Nadarajan, and P. Rangasamy<br />
Effect of maltose on anther culture of Tongil and <strong>in</strong>dica rice 508<br />
G.H. Yi, M.H. Nam, B.G. Oh, and H.Y. Kim<br />
Selection of high green-plant regenerat<strong>in</strong>g l<strong>in</strong>es through rice anther culture 509<br />
T. He, K. Luo, S.H. Han, and X.X. Guo<br />
Develop<strong>in</strong>g restorer l<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong> rice through anther culture 512<br />
J.S. Ryu, H. Ri, T.-S. Ri, and S.-C. Hwang<br />
Develop<strong>in</strong>g blast-resistant l<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong> rice through tissue culture methods 513<br />
J.-S. Ryu, J.-M. Choi, Y.-H. Kang, and S.-Y. Kim<br />
Induction and use of somatic embryogenesis <strong>in</strong> rice improvement 514<br />
N.M. Ramaswamy and M.K. Rajesh<br />
Histological analysis of cell proliferation <strong>in</strong> early stages of rice seed culture 517<br />
J. Motoda and K. Hattori<br />
Factors <strong>in</strong>fluenc<strong>in</strong>g callus <strong>in</strong>duction and plant regeneration from young 518<br />
panicles of rice<br />
S.G. Fan, C.Y. Liang, and H.X. Liu<br />
Tissue culture studies on japonica × <strong>in</strong>dica crosses <strong>in</strong> rice 520<br />
P.C. Deka, D. Sarma, and B.K. Konwar<br />
Identify<strong>in</strong>g molecular markers associated with tissue culture performance 522<br />
<strong>in</strong> diverse rice germplasm<br />
M.D. Raven, H.J. Newbury, and B.V. Ford-Lloyd<br />
xii<br />
<strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
In vitro selection and rapid screen<strong>in</strong>g of high-lys<strong>in</strong>e mutants <strong>in</strong> rice 526<br />
G.H. Yi, M.H. Nam, B.G. Oh, and H.Y. Kim<br />
Produc<strong>in</strong>g stable androclonal variants with improved agronomic traits 527<br />
<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>dica rice<br />
N.V. Desamero, C.L. Diaz, Y.A. Dimaano, M.V. Chico, S.S. Macabale,<br />
L.G. Dom<strong>in</strong>go, E.R. Corpuz, T.F. Padol<strong>in</strong>a, R.E. Tabien, J.M. Niones,<br />
G.B. Amar, H.R. Rapusas, M.V. Romero, and P.S. Bonilla<br />
Somaclonal restorable variation <strong>in</strong> cytoplasmic male sterile l<strong>in</strong>es with 531<br />
cytoplasm from two wild species of Oryza<br />
D.H. L<strong>in</strong>g and Z. Ma<br />
Studies on the cryopreservation of cell suspension cultures of Iranian <strong>in</strong>dica 533<br />
and japonica rice cultivars<br />
N.B. Jelodar, M.R. Davey, and E.C. Cock<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Clean DNA transformation: co-<strong>in</strong>tegration and expression analysis 536<br />
of five m<strong>in</strong>imal transgene cassettes <strong>in</strong> rice<br />
P.K. Agrawal, P. Christou, and A. Kohli<br />
Effects of matrix attachment regions (MARs) on transgene expression levels 538<br />
and stability <strong>in</strong> rice<br />
V. James, B. Worland, J. Snape, and P. Va<strong>in</strong><br />
Double-right-border (DRB) b<strong>in</strong>ary vectors for produc<strong>in</strong>g selectable marker-free 541<br />
transgenic rice<br />
H. Lu, X.-R. Zhou, L. Wu, J. Gorden, K. Ramm, X.-R. Shen, Z-X. Gong,<br />
and N.M. Upadhyaya<br />
Transform<strong>in</strong>g rice with multiple plasmids 544<br />
Somen Nandi, Liy<strong>in</strong>g Wu, Lifang Chen, R.L. Rodriguez, and N<strong>in</strong>g Huang<br />
Construction of three transgenic rice populations by maize transposable 547<br />
element Ac/Dc mutagenesis via Agrobacterium tumefaciens<br />
Zongxiu Sun, Yap<strong>in</strong>g Fu, Zhengge Zhu, Han Xiao, J<strong>in</strong>gliu Zhang,<br />
Hongx<strong>in</strong> Zhang, Guocheng Hu, Yonghong Yu, Huam<strong>in</strong> Si,<br />
and Menm<strong>in</strong>g Hong<br />
Transgene structure and expression <strong>in</strong> a large population of rice plants 550<br />
and their progenies<br />
P. Va<strong>in</strong>, V. James, B. Worland, and J.W. Snape<br />
Organ-specific gene expression and genetic transformation for improv<strong>in</strong>g rice 552<br />
A.K. Tyagi, J.P. Khurana, A.K. Sharma, A. Mohanty, A. Dh<strong>in</strong>gra,<br />
S. Raghuvanshi, A. Mukhopadhyay, V. Gupta, S. Anand,<br />
H. Kathuria, S. Bhushan, J. Thakur, and D. Kumar<br />
<strong>Rice</strong> transformation for resistance to stem borer 555<br />
I. Hanarida Somantri, A.D. Ambarwati, A. Apriana, E. Listanto,<br />
I.S. Dewi, T. Santoso, D. Damayanti, and I. Altosaar<br />
Introduc<strong>in</strong>g the CryIA(c) gene <strong>in</strong>to basmati rice and transmitt<strong>in</strong>g transgenes 558<br />
to R 3<br />
progeny<br />
S.S. Gosal, R. Gill, A.S. S<strong>in</strong>dhu, H.S. Dhaliwal, and P.I. Christou<br />
Wound-<strong>in</strong>ducible expression of the Bacillus thur<strong>in</strong>giensis Cry1B gene 560<br />
<strong>in</strong> transgenic rice<br />
J.C. Breitler, V. Marfà, D. Meynard, L. Vila, I. Murillo,<br />
M.J. Domínguez Rodríguez, M. Royer, B. San Segundo,<br />
J.A. Martínez-Izquierdo, J. Messeguer, J.M. Vassal, and E. Guiderdoni<br />
Inheritance of cry1A(b) and snowdrop lect<strong>in</strong> gna genes <strong>in</strong> transgenic javanica 565<br />
rice progenies and bioassays for resistance to brown planthopper<br />
and yellow stem borer<br />
I.H. Slamet-Loed<strong>in</strong>, Noval<strong>in</strong>a, Satoto, D. Damayanti, Sutrisno,<br />
E.S. Mulyan<strong>in</strong>gsih, P. Christou, and H. Aswid<strong>in</strong>oor<br />
Insect bioassays of transgenic <strong>in</strong>dica rice carry<strong>in</strong>g a synthetic Bt tox<strong>in</strong> 567<br />
gene, cry1A(c)<br />
S.K. Ra<strong>in</strong>a, H.K. Khanna, D. Talwar, A. Tiwari, and U. Kumar<br />
Contents<br />
xiii
Genotype screen<strong>in</strong>g of japonica rice cultivars for Agrobacterium- 570<br />
mediated transformation<br />
K.H. Kang, S.H. Choi, H.P. Moon, Y.S. Chung, I.S. Choi, O.Y. Jeong,<br />
and H.Y. Ryu<br />
Transgenic IR72 l<strong>in</strong>es resistant to n<strong>in</strong>e Philipp<strong>in</strong>e races of Xanthomonas 573<br />
oryzae pv. oryzae<br />
R.R. Aldemita, L.S. Gueco, G.Y. Ilar, E.S. Avellanoza, Z. Ship<strong>in</strong>g,<br />
and C. Fauquet<br />
Characteriz<strong>in</strong>g blast-tolerant transgenic rice constitutively express<strong>in</strong>g 575<br />
the chit<strong>in</strong>ase of the beta-glucanase gene<br />
Y. Nishizawa, K. Nakazono, M. Saruta, M. Kamoshita, E. Nakajima,<br />
M. Ugaki, and T. Hibi<br />
Blast-resistant transgenic rice with a phytoalex<strong>in</strong> gene 577<br />
Z. Tang, W. Tian, L. D<strong>in</strong>g, S. Cao, S. Dai, S. Ye, C. Chu, and L. Li<br />
Production of abiotic stress-tolerant transgenic rice plants 579<br />
A. Grover, S. Katiyar-Agarwal, M. Agarwal, C. Sahi, O. Satya Lakshmi,<br />
H. Dubey, S. Agarwal, and A. Kapoor<br />
Genetic eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g of salt and drought tolerance <strong>in</strong> rice cultivars 582<br />
M. Jacobs, N. Roosens, D.T. Hien, B. Alemany, C. Montes<strong>in</strong>os,<br />
J.M. Mulet, R. Serrano, E. Guiderdoni, J. Van Boxtel, H.H. Zheng,<br />
L.T. B<strong>in</strong>h, and T.T. Thu 582<br />
Improved transgene expression systems and dehydration-tolerant transgenic 584<br />
rice plants<br />
J.K. Kim<br />
<strong>Rice</strong> histone deacetylase: characterization and expression <strong>in</strong> transgenic 587<br />
rice plants<br />
I.C. Jang, N.J. Kim, B.H. Nahm, and J.K. Kim<br />
Transgenic rice resistant to imidazol<strong>in</strong>one herbicides 590<br />
J. Peng, L. Hirayama, and C. Lochetto<br />
Produc<strong>in</strong>g transgenic Basmati rice with the potato protease <strong>in</strong>hibitor II 593<br />
(P<strong>in</strong>II) gene by Agrobacterium-mediated transformation<br />
R.K. Ja<strong>in</strong>, J.S. Rohilla, S. Bhutani, S. Ja<strong>in</strong>, V.K. Chowdhury,<br />
J.B. Chowdhury, and R. Wu<br />
Genetic analysis and field test<strong>in</strong>g of elite rice cultivars transformed with 596<br />
the antisense waxy gene<br />
Qiao-quan Liu, Xiu-hua Chen, Shu-zhu Tang, Zong-yang Wang,<br />
Xiu-l<strong>in</strong> Cai, and M<strong>in</strong>g-hong Gu<br />
Transform<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dica rice cultivars grown <strong>in</strong> Vietnam us<strong>in</strong>g Agrobacterium 598<br />
tumefaciens or particle bombardment<br />
B.B. Bong, T.T. Cuc Hoa, T.K. Hodges, and P. Christou<br />
Manipulation of ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase <strong>in</strong> starch biosynthesis dur<strong>in</strong>g 601<br />
rice seed development<br />
C. Sakuls<strong>in</strong>gharoj, S.-B. Choi, and T.W. Okita<br />
Modification of starch branch<strong>in</strong>g degree <strong>in</strong> transgenic rice 604<br />
W.S. Kim, K.M. Jun, J.S. Kim, S.I. Song, J.K. Kim, and B.H. Nahm<br />
Molecular breed<strong>in</strong>g of rice by modulat<strong>in</strong>g gibberell<strong>in</strong> metabolic pathway 607<br />
H. Tanaka, H. Itoh, T. Sakamoto, T. Kayano, Y. Koga-Ban, M. Kobayashi,<br />
and M. Matsuoka<br />
Molecular tools for manipulat<strong>in</strong>g rice development: markers for cell proliferation 610<br />
M.K. Mishra, M.R. Fowler, A.C. McCormac, S. Devi, D.J. Blackley,<br />
S.M. Daskalova, N.W. Scott, A. Slater, and M.C. Elliott<br />
Function of Cre/lox site-specific recomb<strong>in</strong>ation system <strong>in</strong> the rice genome 612<br />
and its implication<br />
Tran Thi Cuc Hoa, E. Huq, J.R. V<strong>in</strong>cent, H.K. Hodges, B.B. Bong,<br />
and T.K. Hodges<br />
xiv<br />
<strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
<strong>Genetics</strong> of rice pathogens<br />
Develop<strong>in</strong>g and us<strong>in</strong>g SCAR (sequence characterized amplified regions) 619<br />
to analyze Magnaporthe grisea populations pathogenic to rice<br />
D. Tharreau, O. Soubabère, M.H. Lebrun, and J.L. Notteghem<br />
<strong>Genetics</strong> of host range <strong>in</strong> Magnaporthe grisea 621<br />
A.S. Kotasthane and U.S. S<strong>in</strong>gh<br />
Genetic analysis of <strong>in</strong>teraction between rice and the blast pathogen <strong>in</strong> Thailand 624<br />
P. Sirithunya, T. Tooj<strong>in</strong>da, T. Veerapradits<strong>in</strong>, S. Pimpisitthavorn,<br />
S. Sriprakhorn, J. Luangsa-ard, and E. Roumen<br />
Diversity of Pyricularia grisea populations <strong>in</strong> Thailand 627<br />
S. Sriprakhon, T. Veerapradits<strong>in</strong>, S. Pimpisitthavorn, J. Laungsa-ard,<br />
E. Roumen, and P. Sirithunya<br />
Relation between molecular profile and avirulence pattern of Thai isolates of 630<br />
the rice blast pathogen<br />
S. Pimpisitthavorn, E. Roumen, K. Poomputsa, S. Sriprakhon,<br />
T. Veerapradits<strong>in</strong>, J. Luangsa-ard, and P. Sirithunya<br />
Molecular genetic characterization of the rice blast (Pyricularia grisea) 633<br />
population <strong>in</strong> Thailand<br />
T. Veerapradits<strong>in</strong>, T. Tooj<strong>in</strong>da, S. Sriprakhon, S. Pimpisithavorn,<br />
E. Roumen, and P. Sirithunya<br />
Pathogenicity of blast isolates <strong>in</strong> rice 637<br />
M.J.T. Yanoria, T. Imbe, H. Tsunematsu, L. Ebron, D. Mercado,<br />
Y. Fukuta, and H. Kato<br />
Race differentiation of bacterial leaf blight of rice <strong>in</strong> DPR, Korea 640<br />
M.G. Ri, C.S. Jong, and Y.A. Jo<br />
Contents<br />
xv
Preface<br />
Dur<strong>in</strong>g the last few decades, major progress has been made <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g rice productivity.<br />
World rice production has more than doubled from 257 million tons <strong>in</strong><br />
1966 to 589 million tons <strong>in</strong> 2003. This has ma<strong>in</strong>ly been achieved through the application<br />
of pr<strong>in</strong>ciples of Mendelian genetics and conventional plant breed<strong>in</strong>g methods.<br />
The present world population of 6.1 billion is likely to reach 8.0 billion by 2030. To<br />
meet the grow<strong>in</strong>g food need and overcome malnutrition, rice varieties with higher<br />
yield potential and multiple resistance to biotic and abiotic stresses with improved<br />
nutritional quality are needed. Recent advances <strong>in</strong> genetics offer new opportunities<br />
to achieve these objectives.<br />
From be<strong>in</strong>g a poor cous<strong>in</strong> to maize, wheat, and tomato for genetic knowledge,<br />
as recently as the 1980s, rice has become a model plant for molecular genetic research.<br />
Numerous scientists <strong>in</strong> laboratories worldwide have helped make rice a favored<br />
higher plant for molecular and cellular genetic studies. Notable examples <strong>in</strong>clude<br />
genome sequenc<strong>in</strong>g of both <strong>in</strong>dica and japonica rice and isolation and characterization<br />
of genes govern<strong>in</strong>g various agronomic traits. These advances covered <strong>in</strong><br />
this book open new avenues to apply new tools of genomics and reverse genetics to<br />
understand the function of rice genes. Manipulation of such genes would be a breakthrough<br />
<strong>in</strong> rice genetics and breed<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
This book, <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Rice</strong> <strong>Genetics</strong>, is the supplementary volume of <strong>Rice</strong><br />
<strong>Genetics</strong> IV and it conta<strong>in</strong>s 241 research papers presented at the 4th <strong>International</strong><br />
<strong>Rice</strong> <strong>Genetics</strong> Symposium held <strong>in</strong> 2000 at <strong>IRRI</strong>. The book has been divided <strong>in</strong>to seven<br />
sections: (1) genetics and breed<strong>in</strong>g of agronomic traits, (2) genetic diversity, evolution,<br />
and alien <strong>in</strong>trogression, (3) molecular markers, QTL mapp<strong>in</strong>g, and marker-assisted<br />
selection, (4) genomics, (5) gene isolation and function, (6) tissue culture and<br />
transformation, and (7) genetics of rice pathogens.<br />
In the first section, 35 papers cover the genetic analysis and <strong>in</strong>heritance of<br />
various agronomic traits such as male sterility; fertility restoration; hybrid breakdown;<br />
resistance to bacterial blight, blast, and gall midge; and submergence and cold<br />
tolerance. Forty-six papers describe the use of molecular markers <strong>in</strong> the analysis of<br />
genetic diversity, the evolution of cultivated rice, monitor<strong>in</strong>g of alien <strong>in</strong>trogression,<br />
and identification of wild species alleles/QTLs for improv<strong>in</strong>g rice, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g advances<br />
<strong>in</strong> rice cytogenetics through FISH techniques. More than 45 papers highlight the<br />
application of molecular markers <strong>in</strong> tagg<strong>in</strong>g major genes and <strong>in</strong> marker-assisted selection.<br />
Several papers deal with the identification of QTLs for head<strong>in</strong>g date; blast<br />
resistance; tolerance of drought, flood, and cold; alum<strong>in</strong>um tolerance; ozone resistance;<br />
and amylose content. As many as 56 papers cover the advances made <strong>in</strong><br />
genomics and isolation and function of genes. Some highlights <strong>in</strong>clude T-DNA, Tos17,<br />
and the Ac-Ds system as resources for functional genomics and isolation and characterization<br />
of DREB genes, MADS-box genes, transporter genes, a mechanism for<br />
defense signal transduction, biosynthesis of prolam<strong>in</strong>s, and the genetic propensity<br />
for nodulation. Forty-seven papers describe advances <strong>in</strong> tissue culture and transformation<br />
of rice carry<strong>in</strong>g genes for resistance to biotic and abiotic stresses, clean DNA<br />
transformation, and matrix attachment regions for stability of transgene expression.<br />
The last section covers <strong>in</strong> eight papers the genetic structure of blast populations.<br />
Contents<br />
xvii
We hope that this book will be a valuable reference for the scientific community<br />
engaged <strong>in</strong> genetics and breed<strong>in</strong>g of rice, with emphasis on both forward and reverse<br />
genetics and to apply new tools of genomics <strong>in</strong> rice improvement.<br />
xviii<br />
<strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
Acknowledgments<br />
We would like to thank the follow<strong>in</strong>g members of the organiz<strong>in</strong>g committee for the<br />
Fourth <strong>International</strong> <strong>Rice</strong> <strong>Genetics</strong> Symposium: John Bennett, Swapan Datta, Mike<br />
Jackson, Zhikang Li, and Hei Leung. We would also like to give special thanks to<br />
Ronald P. Cantrell, Ren Wang, and William Padol<strong>in</strong>a for their scientific and f<strong>in</strong>ancial<br />
support. F<strong>in</strong>ancial support provided by the Rockefeller Foundation is gratefully acknowledged.<br />
We also thank Yollie Aranguren, Elma Nicolas, Emily Alcantara, George<br />
Reyes, and Diane Mart<strong>in</strong>ez for secretarial help and process<strong>in</strong>g of the manuscripts.<br />
We appreciate the valuable services provided by different teams <strong>in</strong> the follow<strong>in</strong>g<br />
areas: Communication and Publications Services, Food and Hous<strong>in</strong>g Services, Visitors<br />
and Information Services, Physical Plant Services, and a secretarial pool.<br />
Contents<br />
xix
<strong>Genetics</strong> and breed<strong>in</strong>g<br />
of agronomic traits
2 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
Compar<strong>in</strong>g agronomic performance of breed<strong>in</strong>g populations<br />
derived from anther culture and s<strong>in</strong>gle-seed descent <strong>in</strong> rice<br />
H.P. Moon, K.H. Kang, I.S. Choi, O.Y. Jeong, H.C. Hong, S.H. Choi, and H.C. Choi<br />
This experiment was conducted to compare the breed<strong>in</strong>g efficiency of anther culture (AC) and s<strong>in</strong>gle-seed<br />
descent (SSD) methods. A total of 380 AC l<strong>in</strong>es and 916 F 6<br />
SSD l<strong>in</strong>es derived from Ilpumbyeo/Nonganbyeo were<br />
evaluated for field performance of yield-related traits, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g gra<strong>in</strong> quality. No significant difference was found<br />
<strong>in</strong> mean comparisons of yield components between the two methods. There was a wide range of trait variation,<br />
and high transgressive segregation for each trait was detected among the populations derived from either the AC<br />
or SSD method. Regardless of breed<strong>in</strong>g method, a high frequency of the desirable transgressive l<strong>in</strong>es was found<br />
for the three traits (panicle length, number of gra<strong>in</strong>s per panicle, and fertility), <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g that select<strong>in</strong>g superior<br />
recomb<strong>in</strong>ants of these traits could be possible by either the AC or SSD method. The mean performance of<br />
agronomic traits <strong>in</strong> 45 selected elite l<strong>in</strong>es and the five top-rank<strong>in</strong>g l<strong>in</strong>es did not differ significantly between the<br />
two breed<strong>in</strong>g methods. Overall, the AC method produced a considerable extent of genetic variation and superior<br />
rice genotypes <strong>in</strong> the cross we used, imply<strong>in</strong>g that the AC method can be reliably used for the rice breed<strong>in</strong>g<br />
program.<br />
Anther culture and s<strong>in</strong>gle-seed descent are two important breed<strong>in</strong>g<br />
methods to speed up the breed<strong>in</strong>g cycle. In the Korean<br />
program, anther culture plays an important role <strong>in</strong> rice breed<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
It is possible to reliably obta<strong>in</strong> large numbers of <strong>in</strong>bred<br />
l<strong>in</strong>es for selection from anther culture of japonica crosses, although<br />
there are still some problems <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>dica genotypes. A<br />
total of 15 varieties have been developed by anther culture<br />
breed<strong>in</strong>g s<strong>in</strong>ce the first anther-derived variety, Hwaseongbyeo,<br />
was released <strong>in</strong> 1985. These varieties currently account for<br />
around 25% of the rice-grow<strong>in</strong>g area <strong>in</strong> Korea. Despite the<br />
practical use of the technique <strong>in</strong> rice breed<strong>in</strong>g, there is still a<br />
limited understand<strong>in</strong>g of the potential for cultivar development<br />
via anther culture because of its <strong>in</strong>herent factors, such as genotypic<br />
dependence of androgenesis, the deleterious effect of<br />
somaclonal variation (Oono 1983), distortion <strong>in</strong> segregation<br />
by gametic selection dur<strong>in</strong>g androgenesis (Murigneux et al<br />
1993), and only one chance of recomb<strong>in</strong>ation before fixation<br />
<strong>in</strong> the F 1 system (Snape 1976). These factors can <strong>in</strong>fluence<br />
genetic variation and the creation of desirable recomb<strong>in</strong>ants<br />
<strong>in</strong> the breed<strong>in</strong>g l<strong>in</strong>es derived from anther culture. In this study,<br />
we aimed to compare the breed<strong>in</strong>g l<strong>in</strong>es derived from anther<br />
culture and the s<strong>in</strong>gle-seed descent method for field performance<br />
and to determ<strong>in</strong>e the extent of genetic variation and<br />
transgressive phenomenon for yield-related traits and quality<br />
characteristics.<br />
Materials and methods<br />
F 1 plants of Ilpumbyeo/Nonganbyeo and the parental genotypes<br />
were used to develop anther culture (AC) and s<strong>in</strong>gleseed<br />
descent (SSD) l<strong>in</strong>es. The parents differ <strong>in</strong> agronomic plant<br />
characteristics. Anther culture was used with F 1 plants two times<br />
from 1993 to 1995. Vacuum-anther-plat<strong>in</strong>g was used accord<strong>in</strong>g<br />
to the method of Moon et al (1994). Haploids and sterile<br />
plants were discarded and seed harvest<strong>in</strong>g was done on fertile<br />
diploid plants. The R 1 generation was grown for seed multiplication<br />
<strong>in</strong> the rice field and a total of 381 l<strong>in</strong>es of the R 2 generation<br />
were reserved for the population to be tested.<br />
In the SSD method, 1,500 F 2 plants from 10 bulked F 1<br />
seeds of the same cross above were grown <strong>in</strong> the field <strong>in</strong> 1994.<br />
Six hundred plants were randomly selected and a s<strong>in</strong>gle seed<br />
was taken from each plant and advanced to the F 3 generation.<br />
SSD was done to reach the F 5 generation. All seeds were harvested<br />
from each F 5 plant (F 6 seed) and 916 l<strong>in</strong>es of the F 6<br />
generation were produced.<br />
In 1996, the agronomic performance of AC and SSD<br />
l<strong>in</strong>es for yield-related traits <strong>in</strong> AC and SSD populations was<br />
evaluated <strong>in</strong> the field. The physio-chemical traits of rice quality,<br />
<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g gra<strong>in</strong> morphology, white core, white center, alkali<br />
digestion value, and amylose content, were assessed <strong>in</strong><br />
the laboratory. We selected 45 superior l<strong>in</strong>es with good agronomic<br />
traits by visual selection <strong>in</strong> the field from each AC and<br />
SSD population. In 1997, yield trials of selected l<strong>in</strong>es were<br />
conducted <strong>in</strong> a randomized complete block design with three<br />
replications. The middle 10 plants were used for data collection.<br />
Head<strong>in</strong>g date, culm length, panicle length, number of<br />
panicles, number of spikelets per panicle, fertility, and yield<br />
per plant were <strong>in</strong>vestigated and statistically analyzed.<br />
Results and discussion<br />
Agronomic traits and transgressive segregation<br />
of AC and SSD populations<br />
The mean and range for yield and yield components of AC<br />
and SSD populations are shown <strong>in</strong> Table 1. The AC and SSD<br />
populations did not differ significantly <strong>in</strong> mean comparison<br />
for each trait except for number of spikelets per panicle. However,<br />
the AC population <strong>in</strong> actual value showed a slightly higher<br />
mean yield and a tendency of <strong>in</strong>creased growth duration, tall<br />
height, and good fertility. The mean values of those traits <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>Genetics</strong> and breed<strong>in</strong>g of agronomic traits 3
Table 1. Mean and range for yield and yield components for l<strong>in</strong>es derived from anther culture (AC) and s<strong>in</strong>gle-seed descent<br />
(SSD).<br />
Trait<br />
AC SSD Mean of parents<br />
M ± SE Range M ± SE Range D√ a Ilpumbyeo MP Nonganbyeo<br />
Days to head<strong>in</strong>g 117 ± 8.6 96–138 114 ± 9.4 94–141 3 ns 123 118 113<br />
Culm length (cm) 78 ± 7.9 21–91 75 ± 7.9 25–114 3 ns 80 79 78<br />
Panicle length (cm) 23 ± 2.3 12–31 23 ± 2.3 11–36 0 ns 22 23 23<br />
Panicles plant –1 (no.) 14 ± 2.5 8–24 13 ± 2.8 6–32 1 ns 18 17 15<br />
Spikelets panicle –1 (no.) 55 ± 38.7 36–260 161 ± 41.1 27–282 6* 156 151 146<br />
Fertility (%) 88.7 ± 9.7 27–99 84.3 ± 20.5 10–99 4.4 ns 89 88 86<br />
1,000-gra<strong>in</strong> weight (g) 22 ± 2.8 12.5–25.9 21 ± 2.5 9.8–27.0 1 ns 22 21 20<br />
Yield plant –1 (g) 32 ± 8.5 6–55 29 ± 10.4 2–55 3 ns 39 36 33<br />
a D√ = difference of mean between AC and SSD. ns and * <strong>in</strong>dicate not significant and significant at the 5% level.<br />
Table 2. Percentage of transgressive l<strong>in</strong>es for yield and yield components <strong>in</strong> anther culture (AC) and s<strong>in</strong>gle-seed descent (SSD) l<strong>in</strong>es. a<br />
Days to Culm Panicle Panicles Gra<strong>in</strong>s Fertility 1,000-gra<strong>in</strong> Yield<br />
Breed<strong>in</strong>g head<strong>in</strong>g length length plant –1 panicle –1 weight plant –1<br />
method<br />
EH LH SC TC SP LP LPN HPN LGN GN LF HF LG GW LYD YD<br />
AC 23 6 22 5 4 18 32 1 22 34 13 2 7 31 36 5<br />
SSD 60 12 60 17 4 50 43 2 12 43 41 16 14 26 55 7<br />
χ 2 0.3 ns 0.2 ns 1.9 ns 0.1 ns 4.0 ns 1.4 ns 2.7 ns 0.2 ns<br />
a EH = early head<strong>in</strong>g, LH = late head<strong>in</strong>g, SC = short culm, TC = tall culm, SP = short panicle, LP = long panicle, LPN = low panicle number, HPN = high panicle number, LGN<br />
= low gra<strong>in</strong> number, HGN = high gra<strong>in</strong> number, LF = low fertility, HF = high fertility, LGW = low 1,000-gra<strong>in</strong> weight, HGW = high 1,000-gra<strong>in</strong> weight, LYD = low yield, HYD = high<br />
yield.<br />
the AC population are closer to the mid-parental value. The<br />
standard deviations and ranges <strong>in</strong>dicate that AC l<strong>in</strong>es are distributed<br />
closer to the mean. In the SSD population, the mean<br />
agronomic value was lower than the mid-parental value, with<br />
a wider ranger of variation <strong>in</strong> the population, <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g a<br />
greater proportion of l<strong>in</strong>es with negative extremes than <strong>in</strong> the<br />
AC population. Table 2 shows the appearances of transgressive<br />
l<strong>in</strong>es for each trait with<strong>in</strong> each AC and SSD population.<br />
There was a clear trend of transgression accord<strong>in</strong>g to the traits<br />
regardless of breed<strong>in</strong>g method. The absolute number of transgressive<br />
l<strong>in</strong>es was higher <strong>in</strong> the SSD population.<br />
Also, a significant difference was not noted between the<br />
two methods <strong>in</strong> gra<strong>in</strong> morphology, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g gra<strong>in</strong> length,<br />
width, thickness, and physio-chemical traits such as white core<br />
and center, alkali digestion value, and amylose content (data<br />
not shown).<br />
From the viewpo<strong>in</strong>t of practical breed<strong>in</strong>g, the appearance<br />
of superior recomb<strong>in</strong>ants <strong>in</strong> a population is the most important<br />
criterion for determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g that a certa<strong>in</strong> breed<strong>in</strong>g or selection<br />
method could be effectively used <strong>in</strong> the breed<strong>in</strong>g program.<br />
The above results suggest that either the AC or SSD<br />
method seems equally effective <strong>in</strong> obta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g desirable transgressive<br />
genotypes, although genetic variation and the absolute<br />
number of transgressive l<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong> the AC population were<br />
smaller than <strong>in</strong> the SSD population. The primary factor for<br />
successful anther culture breed<strong>in</strong>g depends on the establishment<br />
of an appropriate breed<strong>in</strong>g population. Wenzel et al<br />
(1995) reported that 100 AC l<strong>in</strong>es from a cross are sufficient<br />
to obta<strong>in</strong> superior l<strong>in</strong>es. Alternatively, the probability of obta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />
the best recomb<strong>in</strong>ant can be enhanced by produc<strong>in</strong>g<br />
doubled-haploid (DH) l<strong>in</strong>es from plants <strong>in</strong> later generations.<br />
An F 2 -derived DH population may conta<strong>in</strong> up to 50% more of<br />
the best recomb<strong>in</strong>ants than the F 1 system.<br />
Yield test of selected AC and SSD l<strong>in</strong>es<br />
Forty-five elite l<strong>in</strong>es were selected visually from each AC and<br />
SSD population <strong>in</strong> the field. Selections were made on l<strong>in</strong>es<br />
with desirable traits such as good plant type, moderate plant<br />
height, long and good panicle shape, and high fertility. Table 3<br />
shows the mean yield and yield components of 45 selected<br />
l<strong>in</strong>es and the top five high-yield<strong>in</strong>g l<strong>in</strong>es from each breed<strong>in</strong>g<br />
method. No significant difference <strong>in</strong> mean agronomic performance<br />
was detected between AC and SSD with<strong>in</strong> each selected<br />
group, while the mean of the top five high-yield<strong>in</strong>g l<strong>in</strong>es consistently<br />
exceeded that of the 45 selected l<strong>in</strong>es. When compar<strong>in</strong>g<br />
the mean yield of the basic population from which selection<br />
was made <strong>in</strong> the previous year (Table 1), the 45 selected<br />
l<strong>in</strong>es showed an <strong>in</strong>creased yield of 12% <strong>in</strong> the AC method and<br />
24% <strong>in</strong> the SSD method, although direct comparison is difficult<br />
because of different climatic conditions between the two<br />
years. Although visual selection is not considered to be accurate<br />
for quantitative traits such as yield-related traits, yield<br />
improvement was ma<strong>in</strong>ly achieved by selection, and not breed<strong>in</strong>g<br />
method, <strong>in</strong> the cross used <strong>in</strong> this study.<br />
AC and SSD are two important breed<strong>in</strong>g methods to<br />
speed up the breed<strong>in</strong>g cycle and to save labor and space. The<br />
4 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
Table 3. Mean for yield and yield components of 45 selected l<strong>in</strong>es and the top five<br />
high-yield<strong>in</strong>g l<strong>in</strong>es among AC and SSD populations.<br />
Trait<br />
45 selected l<strong>in</strong>es Best 5 l<strong>in</strong>es<br />
AC SSD AC SSD<br />
Days to head<strong>in</strong>g 119 ± 7.3 121 ± 4.9 125 ± 5.0 128 ± 2.7<br />
Culm length (cm) 75 ± 5.3 73 ± 4.4 84 ± 2.0 87 ± 3.0<br />
Panicle length (cm) 23 ± 1.5 22 ± 1.3 26 ± 1.6 25 ± 0.7<br />
Panicles plant –1 (no.) 15 ± 1.9 15 ± 1.9 18 ± 0.7 16 ± 1.2<br />
Spikelets panicle –1 (no.) 151 ± 30.2 152 ± 39.4 179 ± 15.6 175 ± 15.8<br />
Fertility (%) 82.0 ± 9.1 80 ± 11.7 95.3 ± 0.9 96 ± 0.7<br />
1,000-gra<strong>in</strong> weight (g) 22.3 ± 1.3 22 ± 1.5 22.3 ± 0.9 22.1 ± 1.0<br />
Yield plant –1 (g) 36 ± 28.3 36 ± 24.5 44 ± 2.4 44 ± 2.5<br />
AC method certa<strong>in</strong>ly has a clear time-sav<strong>in</strong>g advantage over<br />
the SSD method. In this study, it took only 4.5 years from cross<strong>in</strong>g<br />
to a yield trial, whereas SSD took 6 years. However, for<br />
overall agronomic performance, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g yield-related traits<br />
and rice quality, the AC and SSD methods were similar <strong>in</strong> terms<br />
of genetic variation, appearance of transgressive l<strong>in</strong>es, and<br />
agronomic performance of selected breed<strong>in</strong>g l<strong>in</strong>es. In this context,<br />
anther culture can also be effectively used <strong>in</strong> a breed<strong>in</strong>g<br />
program. In this experiment, only one cross was used. Therefore,<br />
more extensive and diverse research is necessary to understand<br />
the breed<strong>in</strong>g efficiency of anther culture.<br />
References<br />
Moon HP, Kang KH, Cho SY. 1994. Aseptic mass collection of anthers<br />
for <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g efficiency of anther culture <strong>in</strong> rice breed<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
Int. <strong>Rice</strong> Res. Notes 19(1):30.<br />
Murigneux A, Band S, Beckert M. 1993. Molecular and morphological<br />
evaluation of doubled-haploid l<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong> maize. 2. Com-<br />
parison with s<strong>in</strong>gle-seed descent l<strong>in</strong>es. Theor. Appl. Genet.<br />
87:278-287.<br />
Oono K. 1983. Genetic variability <strong>in</strong> rice plants regenerated from<br />
cell culture. In: Institute of <strong>Genetics</strong>, Academia S<strong>in</strong>ica and<br />
<strong>International</strong> <strong>Rice</strong> Research Institute, editors. Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs of<br />
the Symposium on Tissue Culture Techniques, Cereal Crops<br />
Improvement. Beij<strong>in</strong>g, Ch<strong>in</strong>a. p 95-105.<br />
Snape JW. 1976. A theoretical comparison of diploidized haploid<br />
and s<strong>in</strong>gle-seed descent populations. Heredity 36:275-277.<br />
Wenzel G, Friel U, Jahoor A, Graner A, Foroughi-Wehr B. 1995.<br />
Haploids: an <strong>in</strong>tegral part of applied and basic research. In:<br />
Terz M et al, editors. Current issues <strong>in</strong> plant molecular and<br />
cell biology. Berl<strong>in</strong> (Germany): Kluwer Publish<strong>in</strong>g. p 127-<br />
135.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ address: National Crop Experiment Station, RDA, Suwon<br />
441-100, Korea.<br />
<strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> breed<strong>in</strong>g salt-tolerant rice varieties<br />
B. Mishra, R.K. S<strong>in</strong>gh, and D. Senadhira<br />
Major progress has been made <strong>in</strong> breed<strong>in</strong>g salt-tolerant high-yield<strong>in</strong>g rice varieties for various <strong>in</strong>land sal<strong>in</strong>e,<br />
coastal sal<strong>in</strong>e, and alkal<strong>in</strong>e soils of fragile ecosystems. Of 32 salt-tolerant rice varieties developed by the Central<br />
Soil Sal<strong>in</strong>ity Research Institute (CSSRI), CSR10 was the first dwarf high-yield<strong>in</strong>g salt-tolerant early-matur<strong>in</strong>g rice<br />
variety released. Varieties CSR10 and CSR11 are popular as biological amendments for resource-poor farmers.<br />
CSR13 is a f<strong>in</strong>e-gra<strong>in</strong> salt-tolerant rice variety adapted to alkal<strong>in</strong>e and <strong>in</strong>land sal<strong>in</strong>e soils and CSR27 possesses<br />
dual tolerance of coastal sal<strong>in</strong>ity and sodicity. Both varieties have been released across India. CSR27 possesses<br />
high tissue tolerance and high K + and phosphorus-m<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g ability. We have successfully <strong>in</strong>duced basmati qualities<br />
along with salt tolerance <strong>in</strong> CSR30, the first export-quality basmati rice. It has long slender, highly scented<br />
gra<strong>in</strong>s with good head rice recovery, high kernel elongation on cook<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>in</strong>termediate gelat<strong>in</strong>iz<strong>in</strong>g temperature,<br />
and <strong>in</strong>termediate amylose content. A wide spectrum of rice germplasm (<strong>in</strong>digenous and exotic) has been evaluated<br />
and categorized for tissue tolerance, Na + exclusion, K + and P uptake, and reproductive-stage tolerance.<br />
We have comb<strong>in</strong>ed different physiological mechanisms <strong>in</strong>to one genetic background and these progenies show<br />
<strong>in</strong>creased m<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g of P, K, and Zn and enhanced salt tolerance. However, no s<strong>in</strong>gle physiological mechanism was<br />
found to be responsible for absolute salt tolerance. No correlation was observed for vegetative-stage sal<strong>in</strong>ity<br />
score with reproductive-stage sal<strong>in</strong>ity score and gra<strong>in</strong> yield. Both additive and nonadditive gene effects for<br />
sal<strong>in</strong>ity tolerance, K + , and Na + /K + ratio have been detected. Varieties CSR10, CSR1, CSR13, and CSR 27 were<br />
the best comb<strong>in</strong>ers for sal<strong>in</strong>ity and alkal<strong>in</strong>ity tolerance and related traits.<br />
<strong>Genetics</strong> and breed<strong>in</strong>g of agronomic traits 5
Breed<strong>in</strong>g for salt tolerance is a more promis<strong>in</strong>g, energy-efficient,<br />
economical, and socially acceptable approach than major<br />
eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g processes and soil amelioration, which are<br />
beyond the reach of marg<strong>in</strong>al farmers. <strong>Rice</strong> is the most preferred<br />
and adapted crop for salt-affected soils because of its<br />
<strong>in</strong>herent genetic variability for salt tolerance. Us<strong>in</strong>g this genetic<br />
diversity, breed<strong>in</strong>g from a much broader base has been<br />
followed at CSSRI, Karnal, aim<strong>in</strong>g for significant improvements<br />
that can be easily adapted by resource-poor farmers.<br />
Germplasm improvement and varietal development<br />
<strong>Rice</strong> is recommended as the first crop dur<strong>in</strong>g the reclamation<br />
of alkali soils. It is monocropped <strong>in</strong> coastal sal<strong>in</strong>e areas and<br />
grown <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>land sal<strong>in</strong>e soils wherever water is available. CSSRI<br />
first identified the traditional salt-tolerant variety CSR1<br />
(Damodar) as a donor because gra<strong>in</strong> yield reduction was less<br />
than 50% at soil pH as high as 10.3 (ESP 85), whereas other<br />
varieties showed a very poor performance or failed to survive.<br />
The first dwarf high-yield<strong>in</strong>g salt-tolerant and earlymatur<strong>in</strong>g<br />
rice variety, CSR10, was developed by CSSRI (M40-<br />
431-24-114/Jaya) for cultivation <strong>in</strong> alkali and <strong>in</strong>land sal<strong>in</strong>e<br />
soils. It can withstand high alkal<strong>in</strong>ity (pH 9.8–10.2) and sal<strong>in</strong>ity<br />
(ECe 6–11) under the transplanted, irrigated management<br />
system. Its yield potential is 5–6 t ha –1 <strong>in</strong> normal soils and 3–<br />
5 t ha –1 <strong>in</strong> highly alkali soils. Under moderate stress, it yields<br />
5.0–5.5 t ha –1 . Resource-poor farmers who are unable to afford<br />
chemical amendments are us<strong>in</strong>g CSR10 as a biological<br />
amendment (Mishra et al 1992). The slender-gra<strong>in</strong> rice variety<br />
CSR13, derived from the three-way cross CSR 1/Bas 370/<br />
/CSR 5, was released <strong>in</strong> 1999 for irrigated alkal<strong>in</strong>e (sodic),<br />
<strong>in</strong>land, and coastal sal<strong>in</strong>e soils across zones. It is 100–105 cm<br />
tall and tolerant of alkal<strong>in</strong>e (pH 9.2–10.0) and sal<strong>in</strong>e (ECe<br />
approx. 9) stresses. Gra<strong>in</strong> yield ranges from 5.5 to 6.7 t ha –1<br />
under nonstress soil conditions and from 4.0 to 5.0 t ha –1 <strong>in</strong><br />
salt-affected soils (Mishra and S<strong>in</strong>gh 1999). Another salt-tolerant<br />
high-yield<strong>in</strong>g slender-gra<strong>in</strong> rice variety, CSR27, released<br />
by CVRC <strong>in</strong> 1999 for alkal<strong>in</strong>e and coastal sal<strong>in</strong>e soils of the<br />
country, was derived from the cross Nona Bokra/IR5657-33-<br />
2. It is tolerant of alkal<strong>in</strong>e (pH 9.6–9.9) as well as sal<strong>in</strong>e (ECe<br />
additive and nonadditive effects, and the former showed greater<br />
importance <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>heritance of the traits.<br />
In a study undertaken at CSSRI, significant heterosis over<br />
the mid-parent and better parent was observed for almost all<br />
the characters studied. Gra<strong>in</strong> yield is the prime concern of<br />
breeders. Out of 15 F 1 s, crosses Pokkali/IR28 (79.87), CSR10/<br />
IR28 (67.18), CSR13/IR28 (54.58), and CSR1/IR28 (48.56)<br />
<strong>in</strong>dicated a positive and significant heterotic response over the<br />
mid-parent and cross Pokkali/IR28 (49.31) over the better<br />
parent <strong>in</strong> alkali soil, whereas CSR13/IR28 (35.17) and CSR10/<br />
CSR13 (26.72) over the mid-parent and only one cross (CSR10/<br />
CSR13, 24.53) over the better parent <strong>in</strong> sal<strong>in</strong>e soil exhibited<br />
better heterotic effects.<br />
Recomb<strong>in</strong>ation breed<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Breed<strong>in</strong>g follow<strong>in</strong>g multiple crosses between contrast<strong>in</strong>g parents<br />
from the different groups for the pyramid<strong>in</strong>g of various<br />
physiological traits <strong>in</strong> one genetic background is <strong>in</strong> progress<br />
and populations have been generated to further enhance salt<br />
tolerance. The genotypes are grouped <strong>in</strong>to five categories: (1)<br />
tissue-tolerant, (2) Na + excluders, (3) K + accumulators, (4)<br />
traditional salt-tolerant varieties and landraces, and (5) highyield<strong>in</strong>g<br />
and f<strong>in</strong>e-gra<strong>in</strong> varieties.<br />
If one genotype turns out to be good for two mechanisms,<br />
then its hybridization is attempted with another group<br />
of varieties differ<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> mechanisms. Some proven salt-tolerant<br />
varieties, native types, and landraces are also be<strong>in</strong>g used<br />
for wide-scale cross<strong>in</strong>g. This is a shift<strong>in</strong>g type of gene pool<br />
arrangement for a cross<strong>in</strong>g strategy (S<strong>in</strong>gh et al 2000). The<br />
ideal high-yield<strong>in</strong>g sal<strong>in</strong>ity-tolerant variety should possess the<br />
follow<strong>in</strong>g traits: ability to withstand a high amount of Na + (tissue-tolerant),<br />
m<strong>in</strong>imum per-day uptake of Na + (takes more days<br />
for LC 50 stage), high uptake of K + per day, good <strong>in</strong>itial vigor,<br />
and agronomic superiority with high yield potential.<br />
Ideally, one should develop a variety hav<strong>in</strong>g comb<strong>in</strong>ations<br />
of a high degree of Na + exclusion from CSR10, CSR18,<br />
CSR19, Bas385, PR108, and MI-48; a higher uptake of K +<br />
than Na + from Pac831, Achhi, Muskan, CSR19, and PR108;<br />
high tissue tolerance from IR4630-22-2-5-1-3, CSR21, and<br />
SR26B; and tolerance for a longer time for Na + uptake from<br />
Bas370, CSR10, CSR19, and Pokkali.<br />
Conclusions and suggested future research<br />
We conclude that<br />
l None of the <strong>in</strong>dividual physiological mechanisms of<br />
salt tolerance expla<strong>in</strong>s the absolute level of sal<strong>in</strong>ity<br />
tolerance.<br />
l Plant growth under sal<strong>in</strong>ity is the best <strong>in</strong>dicator of<br />
the level of salt tolerance of the genotype.<br />
l Tolerance could be <strong>in</strong>creased by pool<strong>in</strong>g the positive<br />
salt-tolerance mechanisms of the proven tolerant donors<br />
<strong>in</strong>to one genetic background by recomb<strong>in</strong>ation.<br />
We suggest that future research <strong>in</strong>volve<br />
l Marker-aided selection for DNA polymorphism for<br />
different salt-tolerance mechanisms.<br />
l F 1 anther culture-derived doubled-haploid populations.<br />
l Transfer of salt-tolerant genes from wild types such<br />
as Porteresia coarctata.<br />
References<br />
Griff<strong>in</strong>g B. 1956. Concept of general and specific comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g ability<br />
<strong>in</strong> relation to diallel cross<strong>in</strong>g systems. Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 9:463-<br />
493.<br />
Mishra B. 1994. Breed<strong>in</strong>g for salt tolerance <strong>in</strong> crops. In: Rao et al,<br />
editors. Sal<strong>in</strong>ity management for susta<strong>in</strong>able agriculture—25<br />
years of research at CSSRI. Karnal (India): Central Soil Sal<strong>in</strong>ity<br />
Research Institute. p 226-259.<br />
Mishra B, S<strong>in</strong>gh RK. 1999. F<strong>in</strong>e-gra<strong>in</strong> salt-tolerant rice varieties<br />
developed and released. Sal<strong>in</strong>ity Newsletter, CSSRI, Karnal<br />
10:2.<br />
Mishra B, Akbar M, Seshu DV. 1990. <strong>Genetics</strong> studies on sal<strong>in</strong>ity<br />
tolerance <strong>in</strong> rice towards better productivity <strong>in</strong> salt-affected<br />
soils. <strong>Rice</strong> Research Sem<strong>in</strong>ar, <strong>International</strong> <strong>Rice</strong> Research<br />
Institute, Los Baños, Philipp<strong>in</strong>es, 12 July.<br />
Mishra B, S<strong>in</strong>gh RK, Bhattacharya RK. 1992. CSR10, a newly released<br />
dwarf rice for salt-affected soils. Int. <strong>Rice</strong> Res. Notes<br />
17(1):19.<br />
S<strong>in</strong>gh RK, Mishra B. 1997. Stable genotypes of rice for sodic soils.<br />
Ind. J. Genet. 547(4):431-438.<br />
S<strong>in</strong>gh RK, Mishra B, Flowers TJ, Yeo AR. 2000. Screen<strong>in</strong>g rice<br />
genotypes for sal<strong>in</strong>ity tolerance based on physiological traits.<br />
In: Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs of the Indo-UK (CSSRI-Sussex) workshop<br />
on Salt-Affected Soils and Breed<strong>in</strong>g for Salt-Resistant Crops<br />
held at CSSRI, Karnal, 12-14 October 1999. 27 p.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ address: B. Mishra and R.K. S<strong>in</strong>gh, Division of Crop Improvement,<br />
Central Soil Sal<strong>in</strong>ity Research Institute (CSSRI),<br />
Karnal 132 001, India; D. Senadhira, deceased, former senior<br />
rice breeder, <strong>IRRI</strong>, Philipp<strong>in</strong>es.<br />
<strong>Genetics</strong> and breed<strong>in</strong>g of agronomic traits 7
Breed<strong>in</strong>g for salt tolerance <strong>in</strong> rice<br />
R. Ansari, A. Shereen, S.M. Alam, T.J. Flowers, and A.R.Yeo<br />
Soil sal<strong>in</strong>ity, submergence, and drought are major abiotic factors that affect the growth of rice. Of these, sal<strong>in</strong>ity<br />
poses a major threat because most rice is grown <strong>in</strong> areas with sal<strong>in</strong>e or salt-prone soils. Efforts to breed for<br />
<strong>in</strong>creased salt tolerance have generally had only limited success. There is a need to <strong>in</strong>tegrate knowledge ga<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
on physiological traits with the desirable characters from the breeder’s po<strong>in</strong>t of view to comb<strong>in</strong>e salt tolerance<br />
with economic yield. Mortality dur<strong>in</strong>g early seedl<strong>in</strong>g growth, survival of seedl<strong>in</strong>gs after transplant<strong>in</strong>g, ratios of leaf<br />
chlorophyll a/b, low sodium accumulation <strong>in</strong> the shoot, selective absorption of potassium lead<strong>in</strong>g to a favorable<br />
Na/K ratio, and distribution of sodium among leaves are factors evident at early growth stages that may determ<strong>in</strong>e<br />
the ultimate crop response under sal<strong>in</strong>e conditions.<br />
Widespread sal<strong>in</strong>ity is a major factor <strong>in</strong> world agriculture that<br />
limits crop productivity. <strong>Rice</strong> is an important crop and experimental<br />
evidence suggests that most rice varieties exhibit salt<br />
sensitivity, but that varietal differences tend to manifest themselves<br />
only at moderate salt concentrations, that is, 50 mM<br />
NaCl (Yeo and Flowers 1984). The gra<strong>in</strong> yield of many varieties<br />
is reduced by half at an EC of 6 mS cm –1 equivalent to an<br />
osmotic potential of about –0.23 MPa or 50 mM NaCl <strong>in</strong> solution<br />
cultures under controlled conditions. In spite of this sensitivity,<br />
a wide range of variation exists among different rice<br />
cultivars.<br />
The level of salt tolerance found so far <strong>in</strong> rice is <strong>in</strong>adequate,<br />
however, and the transfer of this trait from exist<strong>in</strong>g<br />
cultivars to comb<strong>in</strong>e desirable characters has had only limited<br />
success because knowledge of the genetic basis of salt tolerance<br />
is limited. The ma<strong>in</strong> expectation from plant physiologists<br />
is the identification of “sal<strong>in</strong>ity markers” as def<strong>in</strong>ed by Epste<strong>in</strong><br />
et al (1979). Such markers <strong>in</strong>clude characters that are associated<br />
with salt stress, are easily identified, and can be used for<br />
screen<strong>in</strong>g salt-tolerant plants <strong>in</strong> large breed<strong>in</strong>g populations.<br />
There is a need to evolve rapid screen<strong>in</strong>g methods to<br />
evaluate promis<strong>in</strong>g stra<strong>in</strong>s and subsequently be able to comb<strong>in</strong>e<br />
desirable characters, and to identify at an early stage of<br />
development some markers that play an important role, and <strong>in</strong><br />
many cases a decisive one, <strong>in</strong> performance at later growth<br />
stages. Some characters were thus identified, which manifest<br />
themselves at an early stage but are directly related to later<br />
performance of plants under sal<strong>in</strong>e conditions.<br />
Leaf mortality<br />
Rapid leaf senescence is a well-known symptom of stress and<br />
it <strong>in</strong>dicates leaf tissue death result<strong>in</strong>g from the excessive accumulation<br />
of ions. This can serve as an <strong>in</strong>dicator of salt tolerance<br />
even at a very early stage of plant development. Twoweek-old<br />
rice seedl<strong>in</strong>gs grown <strong>in</strong> Hoagland solution were sal<strong>in</strong>ized<br />
and leaf mortality was recorded 1–2 wk later. The data<br />
show that the <strong>in</strong>jurious effects of salt were less pronounced at<br />
1 wk but became more severe with time. All the cultivars were<br />
affected adversely after 2 wk of growth at 100 mM and some<br />
did not survive at all, whereas others underwent a drastic reduction<br />
<strong>in</strong> growth. The response at this stage agrees well with<br />
the ultimate yield, that is, those that did better at this stage<br />
such as IR6, Shadab, and Shua-92 had low leaf mortality after<br />
2 wk of growth at 100 mM and high yield (data not given)<br />
compared with their counterparts.<br />
Seedl<strong>in</strong>g survival<br />
For transplanted rice, <strong>in</strong>itial survival is crucial <strong>in</strong> determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />
later performance. Seedl<strong>in</strong>gs that survive at this stage are expected<br />
to produce gra<strong>in</strong> although spike sterility cannot be ruled<br />
out. Seedl<strong>in</strong>g survival after plant<strong>in</strong>g could, to some extent, be<br />
compensated for by us<strong>in</strong>g old seedl<strong>in</strong>gs (8 wk old, for <strong>in</strong>stance,<br />
versus 6 wk old, Ansari et al 1994), but <strong>in</strong>itial seedl<strong>in</strong>g survival<br />
also reflects upon the performance of a particular l<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong><br />
terms of yield. In a study, cultivars Ganja White, Nona Bokra,<br />
IR6, and Shua-92 had better seedl<strong>in</strong>g survival, whereas IR28<br />
and Basmati had the lowest seedl<strong>in</strong>g survival (Table 1). These<br />
cultivars had a more or less similar rank<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> straw or gra<strong>in</strong><br />
weight (data not given).<br />
Leaf chlorophyll<br />
Chlorophyll degradation lead<strong>in</strong>g ultimately to leaf death has<br />
often been reported <strong>in</strong> many plants, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g rice grown <strong>in</strong><br />
sal<strong>in</strong>e conditions (Yeo et al 1990). Under similar conditions<br />
and <strong>in</strong> some cases, however, an <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> chlorophyll per<br />
Table 1. Survival % of 8-wk-old seedl<strong>in</strong>gs 18 d after transplant<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
Cultivars<br />
Sal<strong>in</strong>ity (%)<br />
Control 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5<br />
Pokkali 83 75 67 42 13<br />
Ganja White 100 96 79 48 46<br />
Nona Bokra 100 96 71 46 42<br />
IR6 100 96 96 54 63<br />
Shadab 100 100 79 46 29<br />
IR8 100 96 54 38 17<br />
Shua-92 100 96 84 83 84<br />
IR28 96 88 54 38 17<br />
Basmati 100 92 38 33 0<br />
8 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
unit area has also been reported because of reduced size and<br />
tightly packed mesophyll cells under sal<strong>in</strong>e conditions. In any<br />
case, the ratio of chlorophyll a/b can be an important <strong>in</strong>dicator<br />
of salt tolerance. In one of our studies, chlorophyll contents<br />
<strong>in</strong>creased or showed no reduction <strong>in</strong> rice plants grown under<br />
sal<strong>in</strong>ity, irrespective of their salt tolerance, but the ratio of chlorophyll<br />
a/b seemed to correlate with their salt tolerance (Table<br />
2). This ratio decreased with an <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> sal<strong>in</strong>ity, but a high<br />
a/b ratio was generally observed to contribute to better tolerance<br />
for sal<strong>in</strong>ity.<br />
Table 2. Ratio of chlorophyll a/b <strong>in</strong> rice leaves 18 d after transplant<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
Cultivars<br />
Sal<strong>in</strong>ity (%)<br />
Control 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5<br />
IR6 1.084 1.057 0.981 0.809 0.941<br />
Shadab 1.194 1.094 0.986 0.703 0.963<br />
IR8 1.213 1.136 1.243 0.659 0.573<br />
Shua-92 1.195 1.145 1.175 0.769 0.998<br />
Basmati 370 1.172 0.792 0.605 – –<br />
Basmati S.C. 0.567 0.641 0.807 – –<br />
Jajai-77 1.047 1.014 0.501 – –<br />
Jajai L.G. 1.222 1.164 0.474 0.498 –<br />
IET 4094 0.955 0.986 0.772 0.647 0.936<br />
IR2053 0.976 1.022 0.925 0.826 0.941<br />
Table 3. Effect of sal<strong>in</strong>ity on ion uptake (µM g –1 ) and Na/K ratio <strong>in</strong><br />
two rice cultivars (Shua-92/IR8-C) sal<strong>in</strong>ized at 18 d of growth <strong>in</strong><br />
solution culture.<br />
Harvest<br />
Sal<strong>in</strong>ity (mM NaCl)<br />
(wk after<br />
sal<strong>in</strong>ization) Control 25 50 100<br />
Na<br />
2 22/19 768/898 1,173/1,651 1,551/1,315<br />
3 41/22 532/1,110 976/– 1,252/–<br />
4 16/16 450/1,551 817/– 932/–<br />
K<br />
2 1,036/1,036 884/929 769/830 703/811<br />
3 975/961 742/835 710/– 706/–<br />
4 925/1,088 735/752 623/– 564/–<br />
Na/K<br />
2 2.21/0.018 0.882/0.967 1.525/1.989 2.206/1.622<br />
3 0.042/0.023 0.717/1.329 1.375/– 1.773/–<br />
4 0.017/0.015 0.611 1.311/– 1.653/–<br />
Sodium uptake and Na/K ratio<br />
The accumulation of salts, especially of sodium under sal<strong>in</strong>e<br />
conditions <strong>in</strong> excess of that which could be used for osmotic<br />
adjustment, has harmful effects on plant growth. Large <strong>in</strong>terand<br />
<strong>in</strong>travarietal differences exist <strong>in</strong> rice l<strong>in</strong>es for this trait and<br />
these can be exploited for desirable results. Plants capable of<br />
ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g a balance between sodium and potassium accumulation<br />
<strong>in</strong> their shoot perform better under sal<strong>in</strong>e conditions<br />
than those that are unable to do so. This trait can also be used<br />
as a useful <strong>in</strong>dicator of salt tolerance at the reproductive stage.<br />
In one of our studies where 2-wk-old seedl<strong>in</strong>gs of Shua-92<br />
and IR8C were harvested 2, 3, or 4 wk after sal<strong>in</strong>ization, it<br />
was observed (Table 3) that sodium uptake <strong>in</strong>creased and potassium<br />
decreased with <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g sal<strong>in</strong>ity, but that sodium<br />
seemed to have an unrestricted flow <strong>in</strong> the sensitive IR8C,<br />
whereas the tolerant Shua-92 managed to control this buildup<br />
<strong>in</strong>side its tissue. The Na/K ratio <strong>in</strong>creased with time but decreased<br />
<strong>in</strong> the more tolerant cultivar Shua-92.<br />
Distribution of sodium between leaves<br />
Regulation of the transport and distribution of ions <strong>in</strong> the various<br />
organs of the plant and with<strong>in</strong> the cell is an important factor<br />
<strong>in</strong> the salt tolerance mechanism. The xylem transport of<br />
sodium is generally much lower <strong>in</strong> young leaves than <strong>in</strong> old<br />
ones. This is advantageous for salt tolerance s<strong>in</strong>ce the salts<br />
accumulate <strong>in</strong> older leaves, leav<strong>in</strong>g the younger leaves protected<br />
from salt effects for normal metabolic activities. Table<br />
4 shows the time course of sodium concentration <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividual<br />
leaves of two varieties with contrast<strong>in</strong>g salt tolerance. The<br />
sodium concentration <strong>in</strong>creased rapidly <strong>in</strong> older leaves, whereas<br />
at the early stages the young leaves had lower salts. This was<br />
more evident <strong>in</strong> the resistant Pokkali, <strong>in</strong> which older leaves<br />
filled up progressively with sodium, whereas the younger ones<br />
rema<strong>in</strong>ed comparatively low <strong>in</strong> salts. The sensitive IR28, <strong>in</strong><br />
contrast, was unable to ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> sodium concentration <strong>in</strong> any<br />
leaf below 100 mM kg –1 dry weight after 3–4 d, although the<br />
tolerant variety achieved this for a much longer period. These<br />
results suggested that sodium localization <strong>in</strong> leaves is correlated<br />
with varietal salt tolerance and that it could be used as a<br />
criterion for evaluat<strong>in</strong>g tolerance at the seedl<strong>in</strong>g stage, which<br />
holds true for performance at the reproductive stage.<br />
Table 4. Sodium concentration <strong>in</strong> leaves of IR28/Pokkali (sensitive/tolerant) cultivars<br />
at 3, 6, 9, and 12 d after sal<strong>in</strong>ization with 50 mM NaCl at 14 d.<br />
Leaf<br />
Days after sal<strong>in</strong>ization<br />
0 3 6 9 12<br />
1 200/100 1,600/1,150 2,000/1,400 2,200/1,600 –/1,400<br />
2 100/50 1,100/300 2,200/2,000 2,300/2,000 –/1,700<br />
3 100/50 200/100 2,000/500 3,400/2,300 –/2,500<br />
4 – –/50 1,300/200 2,000/1,400 –/1,800<br />
5 – – – –/450 –/450<br />
<strong>Genetics</strong> and breed<strong>in</strong>g of agronomic traits 9
References<br />
Ansari R, Khanzada AN, Naqvi SSM. 1994. Studies on salt tolerance<br />
<strong>in</strong> rice. In: Naqvi SSM, Ansari R, Flowers TJ, Azmi AR,<br />
editors. Current developments <strong>in</strong> sal<strong>in</strong>ity and drought tolerance<br />
<strong>in</strong> plants. Tandojam (Pakistan): AEARC. p 207-239.<br />
Epste<strong>in</strong> E, K<strong>in</strong>gsbury RW, Norlyn JD, Rush DW. 1979. Production<br />
of food crops and other biomass by seawater culture. In:<br />
Hollaender A, Aller JC, Epste<strong>in</strong> E, San Pietro A, Zaborsky<br />
OR, editors. The biosal<strong>in</strong>e concept: an approach to the utilization<br />
of underexploited resources. New York: Plenum. p 77-<br />
79.<br />
Yeo AR, Flowers TJ. 1984. Mechanisms of sal<strong>in</strong>ity resistance <strong>in</strong> rice<br />
and their role as physiological criteria <strong>in</strong> plant breed<strong>in</strong>g. In:<br />
Staples RC, Toenniessen GH, editors. Sal<strong>in</strong>ity tolerance <strong>in</strong><br />
plant strategies for crop improvement. New York: John Wiley<br />
& Sons. p 151-170.<br />
Yeo AR, Yeo ME, Flowers SA, Flowers TJ. 1990. Screen<strong>in</strong>g of rice<br />
(Oryza sativa L.) genotypes for physiological characters contribut<strong>in</strong>g<br />
to sal<strong>in</strong>ity resistance and their relationship to overall<br />
performance. Theor. Appl. Genet. 79:377-384.<br />
Notes<br />
Genetic analysis and prediction of heterosis<br />
C.H.M. Vijayakumar, M. Ilyas Ahmed, B.C. Viraktamath, M.S. Ramesha, and A. Jauhar Ali<br />
Authors’ address: R. Ansari, A. Shereen, S.M. Alam, Nuclear Institute<br />
of Agriculture, Tandojam, Pakistan; T.J. Flowers and A.R.<br />
Yeo, School of Biological Sciences, University of Sussex,<br />
Brighton, UK.<br />
Selection of suitable parents to realize the high heterotic potential of hybrids and to predict heterosis is a major<br />
component of heterosis breed<strong>in</strong>g. Results on (1) group<strong>in</strong>g of parents and their relationship with heterosis and (2)<br />
genetic enhancement of heterosis are described. In the first experiment, 116 restorers whose hybrid comb<strong>in</strong>ations<br />
have been evaluated <strong>in</strong> national tests were evaluated <strong>in</strong> the field for 2 y. Data collected were used to group<br />
the restorers based on DMRT followed by jo<strong>in</strong>t scor<strong>in</strong>g over traits. Restorers were grouped as high, medium, and<br />
low based on mean and standard deviation of jo<strong>in</strong>t scores. More than 75% of the entries were found <strong>in</strong> the same<br />
groups <strong>in</strong> both years, imply<strong>in</strong>g a very high reproducibility and repeatability of the group<strong>in</strong>g method. Only 50<br />
restorers out of 116 were found to give heterotic hybrids with a yield advantage of 1.0 t ha –1 over the best <strong>in</strong>bred<br />
check at one or more of the test locations. Interest<strong>in</strong>gly, a great majority of the restorers (>86%) show<strong>in</strong>g<br />
heterosis were from the medium group, emphasiz<strong>in</strong>g the need to select restorers from this group to develop<br />
heterotic hybrids. In another experiment, 28 F 6<br />
l<strong>in</strong>es derived from a cytoplasmic male sterile (CMS)-based<br />
hybrid, IR62829A/WGL 3962, were crossed with IR62829A to assess the potential of newly developed<br />
isocytoplasmic restorers. The F 1<br />
crosses were evaluated along with the orig<strong>in</strong>al hybrid, IR62829A/WGL 3962.<br />
Data on yield, yield traits, and spikelet fertility were recorded for 29 hybrids, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g the orig<strong>in</strong>al hybrid. Results<br />
<strong>in</strong>dicated that only 32% of the restorers were able to restore complete fertility <strong>in</strong> hybrids, imply<strong>in</strong>g that the<br />
restoration is governed by more than one gene. Nearly 14% of the crosses <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g new restorers showed<br />
significant heterosis over the orig<strong>in</strong>al hybrid from which they were derived, <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g that heritable genetic<br />
factors are responsible for heterosis.<br />
The genetic ga<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong> yield and yield stability offered by heterosis<br />
have prompted the use of hybrids <strong>in</strong> several crops. The<br />
magnitude of heterosis depends on the choice of appropriate<br />
parental l<strong>in</strong>es. Selection of suitable donors to improve parents<br />
for heterotic potential and to predict the performance of hybrids<br />
based on the parents has always been a primary objective<br />
<strong>in</strong> all hybrid crop breed<strong>in</strong>g programs, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g rice. Only<br />
a few cytoplasmic male sterile (CMS) l<strong>in</strong>es could be used for<br />
develop<strong>in</strong>g commercial rice hybrids. This underscores the need<br />
for emphasiz<strong>in</strong>g the selection of male parents (restorers). Several<br />
methods, such as per se performance, comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g ability,<br />
Mahalanobis’s generalized distance, and others, were employed<br />
us<strong>in</strong>g pedigree <strong>in</strong>formation, morphological traits, biochemical<br />
data, and DNA-based markers to study the genetic diversity<br />
among parents and heterosis (Melch<strong>in</strong>ger 1997) and to<br />
select prospective parents. The results, however, have not been<br />
consistent. There are no recognized heterotic groups <strong>in</strong> rice.<br />
Therefore, the development of a method for choos<strong>in</strong>g potential<br />
parents before mak<strong>in</strong>g all possible crosses and their field<br />
evaluation could improve the efficiency of hybrid breed<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
The genetic mechanisms underly<strong>in</strong>g heterosis are largely<br />
unknown. We report on the relationship between the distribution<br />
of restorers and heterosis and also on the <strong>in</strong>heritance of<br />
genes responsible for heterosis from the heterotic hybrid to its<br />
progenies <strong>in</strong> selfed generations.<br />
Materials and methods<br />
The materials for the first set of experiments comprised 116<br />
known restorers whose hybrid comb<strong>in</strong>ations have been evaluated<br />
over the years <strong>in</strong> national tests <strong>in</strong> various network centers<br />
<strong>in</strong> India. The 116 restorers were evaluated <strong>in</strong> the field <strong>in</strong> a<br />
randomized block design dur<strong>in</strong>g the 1995 and 1996 wet seasons<br />
(WS). Each entry was planted <strong>in</strong> a s<strong>in</strong>gle row, 3 m long,<br />
and spaced 20 cm between rows and 15 cm between plants. At<br />
maturity, gra<strong>in</strong> yield m –2 and observations on several yield traits<br />
10 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
Table 1. Distribution of 116 restorers <strong>in</strong>to different categories and their comparison<br />
between years. a SYP PY m –2<br />
Group<br />
1995 1996 % common 1995 1996 % common<br />
High 17 (14.7) 16 (13.8) 47.1 16 (13.8) 19 (16.4) 31.2<br />
(m – σ)<br />
≤(m + σ)<br />
Low 17 (14.7) 15 (12.9) 29.4 14 (12.1) 17 (14.7) 21.4<br />
>(m + σ)<br />
m 0.61 0.57 – 0.61 0.58 –<br />
σ 0.11 0.13 – 0.11 0.13 –<br />
a Numbers <strong>in</strong> parentheses <strong>in</strong>dicate percent values. m = mean, σ = standard deviation.<br />
were recorded from five randomly selected plants. Data collected<br />
on eight traits—plant height (HT), panicle number<br />
plant –1 (PN), panicle length (PL), number of fertile spikelets<br />
(FS), spikelet fertility percent (SFP%), 100-gra<strong>in</strong> weight (TW),<br />
seed yield plant –1 (SYP), and plot yield m –2 (PY m –2 )—were<br />
used to classify the restorers. Initially, overlapp<strong>in</strong>g groups of<br />
restorers were obta<strong>in</strong>ed for each trait based on Duncan’s multiple<br />
range test (DMRT). Then, a jo<strong>in</strong>t score over seven traits<br />
(<strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g either SYP or PY m –2 <strong>in</strong> comb<strong>in</strong>ation with other<br />
traits) was computed for each l<strong>in</strong>e follow<strong>in</strong>g a method detailed<br />
by Arunachalam and Bandyopadhyay (1984). Us<strong>in</strong>g mean and<br />
standard deviation of jo<strong>in</strong>t scores, three groups—high, medium,<br />
and low—were formed. Data on the evaluation of hybrids<br />
<strong>in</strong> the national test<strong>in</strong>g program were used to identify promis<strong>in</strong>g<br />
restorers (whose hybrid comb<strong>in</strong>ations showed commercial<br />
yield heterosis). The percentage of promis<strong>in</strong>g restorers<br />
was calculated for each group.<br />
The materials for the second set of experiments comprised<br />
a CMS-based hybrid, IR62829A/WGL 3962R, and 28<br />
F 1 crosses made between recomb<strong>in</strong>ant <strong>in</strong>bred l<strong>in</strong>es (RILs) (derived<br />
from IR62829A/WGL 3962R) and their female parent,<br />
IR62829A. All the F 1 crosses, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g the orig<strong>in</strong>al hybrid<br />
(IR62829A/WGL 3962R), were evaluated <strong>in</strong> a randomized<br />
block design (RBD) dur<strong>in</strong>g the 1997 WS. Each entry was<br />
planted <strong>in</strong> three 3-m-long rows with a row-to-row spac<strong>in</strong>g of<br />
20 cm and between-plant spac<strong>in</strong>g of 15 cm. Data on yield,<br />
yield traits, and spikelet fertility were collected from five plants<br />
<strong>in</strong> each entry. Data on gra<strong>in</strong> yield and spikelet fertility were<br />
used to identify heterotic hybrids.<br />
Results and discussion<br />
Table 1 presents the distribution of restorers based on DMRT<br />
followed by jo<strong>in</strong>t scores. To validate the results for the large<br />
sample size, PY m –2 was used <strong>in</strong> place of SYP <strong>in</strong> comb<strong>in</strong>ation<br />
with six other traits that were common to both SYP and PY<br />
m –2 . A majority (69–74%) of the restorers were found to be <strong>in</strong><br />
the medium group. Restorers <strong>in</strong> the high and low groups accounted<br />
for 13.8–16.4% and 12.1–14.7%, respectively. Differences<br />
between years and between SYP and PY m –2 were<br />
marg<strong>in</strong>al for the distribution percentages. These results confirmed<br />
our earlier f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs (Vijayakumar et al 1999), where<br />
29 parents were used for the study. When SYP was used for<br />
the analysis, nearly 75% of the restorers that were found <strong>in</strong> the<br />
medium group <strong>in</strong> 1995 also appeared <strong>in</strong> the same group <strong>in</strong><br />
1996. This was common for both traits, because slight variations<br />
<strong>in</strong> estimates of standard deviation caused the genotypes<br />
to move <strong>in</strong> or out of the medium group. Such an <strong>in</strong>terchange<br />
never occurred between the high and low groups.<br />
Of 116 restorers, only 50 showed standard heterosis with<br />
a yield advantage of 1.0 t ha –1 or more over the highest-yield<strong>in</strong>g<br />
variety <strong>in</strong> national tests <strong>in</strong> one or more locations. Of these<br />
50, as many as 36 restorers appeared <strong>in</strong> the same group dur<strong>in</strong>g<br />
both years of test<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g 72% reproducibility. These<br />
36 <strong>in</strong>cluded 31 from the medium group alone, with four from<br />
the high group and one from the low group, account<strong>in</strong>g for<br />
86.1%, 11.1%, and 2.8%, respectively. These f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs, based<br />
on 2-y data, were similar to our earlier observations<br />
(Vijayakumar et al 1999). A careful look at the hybrid evaluation<br />
data further revealed that most of the hybrids that exhibited<br />
heterosis <strong>in</strong> many test locations or over years had restorers<br />
from the medium group. Although the restorers found <strong>in</strong><br />
the high category gave hybrid comb<strong>in</strong>ations with standard heterosis,<br />
their frequency was low. These were mostly superior <strong>in</strong><br />
performance (Table 2). The mean values of those <strong>in</strong> the high<br />
category for all traits were always higher, followed by the<br />
medium group (Table 2). This meant that most of the l<strong>in</strong>es that<br />
were selected based on their performance need not show heterosis<br />
<strong>in</strong> their hybrids. Contrary to our earlier results, one restorer<br />
belong<strong>in</strong>g to the low group showed standard heterosis.<br />
Table 3 shows the results on the performance of new<br />
isocytoplasmic restorers compared with their paternal parent.<br />
Only 32% or 9 out of 28 l<strong>in</strong>es restored normal fertility <strong>in</strong> their<br />
hybrids, whereas the rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g 68% showed only partial fertility.<br />
This implied that fertility restoration was controlled by<br />
more than one gene, s<strong>in</strong>ce normal fertile plants were selected<br />
<strong>in</strong> all the segregat<strong>in</strong>g generations to develop new l<strong>in</strong>es. If the<br />
fertility restoration was monogenically controlled, it is expected<br />
that all the crosses would restore normal fertility because the<br />
plants were already selected <strong>in</strong> the wild abortive (WA) cyto-<br />
<strong>Genetics</strong> and breed<strong>in</strong>g of agronomic traits 11
Table 2. Mean comparison of three categories for various traits<br />
(frequency %).<br />
1995 1996<br />
Trait a High Medium Low High Medium Low<br />
HT 105.6 95.1 85.6 99.1 90.4 83.4<br />
PN 7.9 7.8 7.7 9.0 8.5 8.2<br />
PL 26.0 25.2 25.0 24.8 23.4 21.7<br />
FS 133.3 112.4 94.1 126.5 106.7 86.5<br />
SFP 90.1 85.8 82.5 89.5 86.4 83.2<br />
TW 2.6 2.4 2.2 2.5 2.4 2.1<br />
SYP 20.9 15.6 13.3 20.2 15.2 10.8<br />
PY m –2 608.6 521.8 461.7 562.8 411.6 270.1<br />
a HT = plant height, PN = panicle number plant –1 , PL = panicle length, FS = number<br />
of fertile spikelets, SFP = spikelet fertility percent, TW = 100-gra<strong>in</strong> weight, SYP =<br />
seed yield plant –1 , PY = plot yield m –2 .<br />
Table 3. Performance comparison of newly developed isocytoplasmic<br />
restorers with their paternal parent for heterotic potential.<br />
Particulars<br />
.Test hybrids Performance of<br />
the orig<strong>in</strong>al hybrid<br />
No. % Range for (IR62829A/<br />
trait WGL 3962R)<br />
Hybrids show<strong>in</strong>g normal 9 32.1 75.7–91.7 73.0<br />
spikelet fertility (%)<br />
Hybrids show<strong>in</strong>g yield 5 17.8 14.4–29.9 12.4<br />
advantage over the<br />
orig<strong>in</strong>al (g plant –1 )<br />
Hybrids show<strong>in</strong>g 4 14.3 23.1–29.9 –<br />
significant heterosis<br />
(g plant –1 )<br />
plasm background. Fertility restoration of WA cytoplasm is<br />
controlled by two dom<strong>in</strong>ant genes, Rf-3 (Rf-WA-1) and Rf-4<br />
(Rf-WA-2), located on chromosomes 7 and 10, respectively<br />
(Bharaj et al 1995). Interest<strong>in</strong>gly, the occurrence of 32% restorers<br />
among the derived l<strong>in</strong>es is still higher than the normal<br />
frequency observed <strong>in</strong> conventional testcrosses <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g varieties<br />
and elite breed<strong>in</strong>g l<strong>in</strong>es, which ranges from 20% to 25%.<br />
Nearly 17% of the hybrid comb<strong>in</strong>ations (5 out of 28) tested<br />
showed a yield advantage over the orig<strong>in</strong>al hybrid, IR62829A/<br />
WGL 3962R. These observations had many implications for<br />
hybrid breed<strong>in</strong>g. First, the isolation of restorers from CMSbased<br />
heterotic hybrids, otherwise called isocytoplasmic restorers,<br />
can be considered as an effective method for develop<strong>in</strong>g<br />
new restorers. Second, the observation that the derived<br />
l<strong>in</strong>es are more heterotic than their paternal parent <strong>in</strong>dicated<br />
that the gene or gene comb<strong>in</strong>ations responsible for heterosis<br />
were <strong>in</strong>herited from the hybrid and their progenies down the<br />
self<strong>in</strong>g generations.<br />
Bharaj TS, Virmani SS, Khush GS. 1995. Chromosomal location of<br />
fertility restor<strong>in</strong>g genes for ‘wild abortive’ cytoplasmic male<br />
sterility us<strong>in</strong>g primary trisomics <strong>in</strong> rice. Euphytica 83:169-<br />
173.<br />
Melch<strong>in</strong>ger A. 1997. Genetic diversity and heterosis. In: Coors JG,<br />
Pandey S, editors. <strong>Genetics</strong> and exploitation of heterosis <strong>in</strong><br />
crops. Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs of the <strong>International</strong> Symposium on <strong>Genetics</strong><br />
and Exploitation of Heterosis <strong>in</strong> Crops, 17-22 August<br />
1997, CIMMYT, Mexico. p 99-118.<br />
Vijayakumar CHM, Ilyas Ahmed M, Viraktamath BC, Ramesha MS.<br />
1999. Selection of parents and prediction of heterosis <strong>in</strong> rice.<br />
Indian J. Genet. 59(3):295-300.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ addresses: C.H.M. Vijayakumar, M. Ilyas Ahmed, B.C.<br />
Viraktamath, M.S. Ramesha, Directorate of <strong>Rice</strong> Research,<br />
Rajendranagar, Hyderabad 500 030; and J. Ali, Agricultural<br />
College and Research Institute, Thiruchirapalli 620 009, India.<br />
References<br />
Arunachalam V, Bandyopadhyay A. 1984. A method to make decisions<br />
jo<strong>in</strong>tly on a number of dependent characters. Indian J.<br />
Genet. 44(3):419-424.<br />
Relationship of parental genetic diversity with heterosis<br />
<strong>in</strong> two-l<strong>in</strong>e and three-l<strong>in</strong>e Philipp<strong>in</strong>e rice hybrids<br />
L.S. Moreno, S.A. Ordoñez, I.A. Dela Cruz, and E.D. Redoña<br />
Heterosis <strong>in</strong> rice has been acknowledged to be associated with the genetic divergence of the parents used <strong>in</strong><br />
hybridization. We <strong>in</strong>vestigated the nature and extent of the correlation between microsatellite marker heterozygosity<br />
and heterosis for some quantitative traits <strong>in</strong> 48 three-l<strong>in</strong>e and 13 two-l<strong>in</strong>e F 1<br />
rice hybrids. The parental<br />
l<strong>in</strong>es used represented the breadth of genetic diversity <strong>in</strong> the Philipp<strong>in</strong>e hybrid rice gene pool. F 1<br />
heterozygosity<br />
was deduced from parental genotypes at 43 to 108 microsatellite loci spann<strong>in</strong>g the 12 rice chromosomes.<br />
Results revealed simple sequence repeat (SSR) heterozygosity and heterotic performance (measured as the<br />
superiority over the male parent) to be significantly correlated at the 1% probability level for the number of<br />
12 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
productive tillers per plant (r = 0.41**) and leaf area <strong>in</strong>dex (r = 0.39**), whereas gra<strong>in</strong> yield (r = –0.30*) was<br />
correlated with heterosis at the 5% probability level <strong>in</strong> the three-l<strong>in</strong>e F 1<br />
hybrids. When the analysis was based on<br />
hybrids with positive heterosis, significant correlations were observed for leaf area <strong>in</strong>dex (r = 0.45*), number of<br />
productive tillers per plant (r = 0.40*), and harvest <strong>in</strong>dex (r = 0.77*) at the 5% probability level. SSR heterozygosity<br />
<strong>in</strong> the two-l<strong>in</strong>e hybrids ranged from 0.43 to 0.66, suggest<strong>in</strong>g a moderate extent of genotypic divergence<br />
among the parental cultivars. Heterotic performance of the hybrids was highest for gra<strong>in</strong> yield and percent<br />
spikelet fertility at 62% and 25.6%, respectively. However, the relationship between heterosis and molecular<br />
genetic diversity was usually weak for most of the traits studied <strong>in</strong> the two-l<strong>in</strong>e hybrids.<br />
Rapid progress <strong>in</strong> genomics research and the development of<br />
new and simpler DNA-based markers have stimulated efforts<br />
to predict the performance of hybrids based on molecular data<br />
of their parents, thus speed<strong>in</strong>g up the selection process <strong>in</strong> hybrid<br />
breed<strong>in</strong>g programs. Microsatellites or simple sequence<br />
repeats (SSRs) are powerful DNA markers that can serve as<br />
tools <strong>in</strong> assess<strong>in</strong>g the diversity of parental cultivars at the DNA<br />
level, yield<strong>in</strong>g much more <strong>in</strong>formation than if diversity assessment<br />
were based on phenotype alone.<br />
In the Philipp<strong>in</strong>es, exploitation of heterosis <strong>in</strong> rice to<br />
<strong>in</strong>crease production and atta<strong>in</strong> self-sufficiency has been <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly<br />
recognized by both the public and private sectors. Predict<strong>in</strong>g<br />
the performance of a hybrid us<strong>in</strong>g molecular techniques<br />
could expedite the development of highly heterotic comb<strong>in</strong>ations<br />
for commercial cultivation <strong>in</strong> farmers’ fields. However,<br />
the relationship between marker heterozygosity and heterosis<br />
has varied <strong>in</strong> different germplasm used (Saghai Maroof et al<br />
1997, Liu and Wu 1998). The l<strong>in</strong>ear relationship between<br />
molecular divergence of the parents and heterosis <strong>in</strong> three-l<strong>in</strong>e<br />
and two-l<strong>in</strong>e hybrids <strong>in</strong> the Philipp<strong>in</strong>e hybrid rice gene pool is<br />
unreported.<br />
Materials and methods<br />
Twenty-five parental cultivars consist<strong>in</strong>g of 5 cytoplasmicgenetic<br />
male sterile (CMS) l<strong>in</strong>es, 10 restorer (R) l<strong>in</strong>es, 4<br />
thermosensitive genetic male sterile (TGMS) l<strong>in</strong>es, and 6 popular<br />
Philipp<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong>bred varieties were used to develop 48 threel<strong>in</strong>e<br />
and 13 two-l<strong>in</strong>e F 1 hybrids. The CMS l<strong>in</strong>es were earlier<br />
shown to be genetically diverse based on 222 amplified fragment<br />
length polymorphism (AFLP), SSR, and random amplified<br />
polymorphic DNA (RAPD) markers (Redoña et al 1998).<br />
Heterotic performance of the hybrids was evaluated <strong>in</strong> the field<br />
follow<strong>in</strong>g a systematic plot arrangement and randomized complete<br />
block design with four check varieties—<strong>in</strong>breds PSBRc28<br />
and PSBRc18, and the hybrids PSBRc26H or Magat and<br />
PSBRc72H or Mestizo. Three to five plants were exam<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
for 10 vegetative and reproductive characters—plant height,<br />
maturity, leaf area <strong>in</strong>dex (LAI), root length, root weight, number<br />
of productive tillers, harvest <strong>in</strong>dex, gra<strong>in</strong> yield, panicle<br />
length, and percent seed fertility.<br />
One hundred eight and 45 SSR primers were used to<br />
amplify SSR loci as described by Yang et al (1994) <strong>in</strong> the parental<br />
cultivars of the two-l<strong>in</strong>e and three-l<strong>in</strong>e F 1 hybrids, respectively.<br />
Dist<strong>in</strong>ct DNA fragments that were separated <strong>in</strong> a<br />
5% denatur<strong>in</strong>g polyacrylamide gel and detected us<strong>in</strong>g silver<br />
RM255<br />
RM164<br />
Fig. 1. Microsatellite polymorphism as detected by short tandem<br />
repeats at selected loci.<br />
sta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g were scored as <strong>in</strong>dividual alleles represent<strong>in</strong>g a particular<br />
locus (Fig. 1). Marker heterozygosity of the F 1 s or the<br />
genetic distance between the parents was measured as the percentage<br />
difference of marker genotypes across SSR loci between<br />
the two parents of each cross comb<strong>in</strong>ation. Cluster analysis<br />
was performed follow<strong>in</strong>g the UPGMA procedure and the<br />
computer program NTSYS-PC (Rohlf 1990).<br />
Results and discussion<br />
Forty-three of 45 SSR primers detected polymorphism among<br />
the parental cultivars used to develop the three-l<strong>in</strong>e hybrids.<br />
Cluster analysis us<strong>in</strong>g the polymorphic loci separated the CMS<br />
and R l<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong>to two and eight groups, respectively, at a 75%<br />
level of genetic similarity (Fig. 2), <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g the presence of<br />
substantial genetic variation <strong>in</strong> the parental cultivars that could<br />
be exploited to develop hybrids with a wide genetic base.<br />
However, heterosis levels <strong>in</strong> the F 1 s derived from the crosses<br />
of these parents showed low to <strong>in</strong>termediate heterosis for plant<br />
height, maturity, harvest <strong>in</strong>dex, and gra<strong>in</strong> yield. In contrast,<br />
heterosis was high for LAI, root length, root weight, and number<br />
of tillers plant –1 .<br />
Correlation between SSR heterozygosity based on 43<br />
marker loci and heterotic performance <strong>in</strong> the 48 three-l<strong>in</strong>e hybrids<br />
was significant for number of productive tillers per plant<br />
(r = 0.41**), LAI (r = 0.39**), and gra<strong>in</strong> yield (r = –0.30*)<br />
when all F 1 s were used <strong>in</strong> the analysis (Table 1). When only<br />
<strong>Genetics</strong> and breed<strong>in</strong>g of agronomic traits 13
0.66 0.69 0.72 0.75 0.78 0.81 0.84 coefficient<br />
Similarity<br />
PR1A<br />
Fig. 2. Dendrogram of 15 parental l<strong>in</strong>es used to develop 3-l<strong>in</strong>e hybrids based on 45<br />
SSR marker variants.<br />
Bo A<br />
913 A<br />
Zhangyu<br />
PR28127<br />
PR2A<br />
SN62 a<br />
IR58025 A<br />
E2-208<br />
SN45 b<br />
O-71<br />
Toyosake<br />
E2-50<br />
1xS-24<br />
1xS-30<br />
Table 1. Correlation between parental genetic distance and heterosis for eight<br />
traits <strong>in</strong> 48 three-l<strong>in</strong>e F 1 hybrid comb<strong>in</strong>ations (average data of 1998 wet and<br />
dry seasons).<br />
Trait<br />
Male parent PSBRc28 PSBRc72H<br />
I II I II I II<br />
Plant height –0.15 0.01 –0.10 0.24 –0.10 –0.19<br />
Maturity –0.08 0.27 –0.15 –0.19 –0.15 None<br />
Leaf area <strong>in</strong>dex 0.39** 0.45* –0.17 0.11 –0.21 –0.12<br />
Root length 0.10 –0.06 0.10 –0.12 0.10 0.02<br />
Root weight 0.13 0.05 0.05 0.03 0.05 0.002<br />
No. of tillers plant –1 0.41** 0.40* 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.21<br />
Harvest <strong>in</strong>dex –0.26 0.77* –0.26 None –0.29* –0.66<br />
Yield –0.30* –0.03 –0.29* –0.43 –0.30* –0.81<br />
a Correlations based on 48 F 1 hybrid comb<strong>in</strong>ations. b Correlations based on F 1 hybrid comb<strong>in</strong>ations<br />
with positive heterosis.<br />
Table 2. Correlation between marker<br />
heterozygosity (general) and heterosis<br />
for seven traits <strong>in</strong> 13 two-l<strong>in</strong>e hybrid<br />
comb<strong>in</strong>ations.<br />
Trait<br />
r values a<br />
Yield –0.28<br />
Maturity 0.29<br />
Plant height –0.34<br />
No. of productive tillers –0.09<br />
Panicle length –0.28<br />
Number of spikelets –0.17<br />
% spikelet fertility –0.20<br />
a r values were <strong>in</strong>significant at the 0.05 probability<br />
level.<br />
hybrids with positive heterosis for each trait were <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong><br />
the analysis, significant correlations were observed for LAI (r<br />
= 0.45*), number of productive tillers per plant (r = 0.40*),<br />
and harvest <strong>in</strong>dex (r = 0.77*) at the 0.05 probability level.<br />
Although marker heterozygosity or parental genetic distance<br />
has been reported to be associated with expression of heterosis<br />
for some quantitative traits <strong>in</strong> the F 1 (Saghai Maroof et al<br />
1997), the relationship observed with the germplasm used <strong>in</strong><br />
the study was generally low for most of the traits evaluated<br />
when the correlation analysis was based on all the markers<br />
used (general heterozygosity).<br />
Among the parental l<strong>in</strong>es used <strong>in</strong> develop<strong>in</strong>g the twol<strong>in</strong>e<br />
hybrids, microsatellite heterozygosity ranged from 0.43<br />
to 0.66. Heterotic performance of the F 1 s was highest for gra<strong>in</strong><br />
yield and percent spikelet fertility at 62% and 25.6%, respec-<br />
tively. Hence, molecular divergence as well as heterosis levels<br />
appeared to be substantial <strong>in</strong> this set of two-l<strong>in</strong>e hybrid<br />
germplasm. However, <strong>in</strong>significant correlations were mostly<br />
observed between parental genetic distance and heterosis for<br />
the quantitative traits analyzed (Table 2). Hence, at least <strong>in</strong><br />
this set of germplasm, results confirm the previous f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs of<br />
Liu and Wu (1998) that neither molecular genetic diversity of<br />
parental l<strong>in</strong>es nor heterozygosity <strong>in</strong> the F 1 appear to be good<br />
parameters for heterosis and selection of parental l<strong>in</strong>es for use<br />
<strong>in</strong> hybrid breed<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
Several factors appear to <strong>in</strong>fluence the complex relationship<br />
of molecular diversity data and heterosis <strong>in</strong> rice. Zhang et<br />
al (1996) suggested that the use of DNA markers closely l<strong>in</strong>ked<br />
to specific traits such as yield to determ<strong>in</strong>e specific heterozygosity<br />
may be more effective <strong>in</strong> predict<strong>in</strong>g heterotic perfor-<br />
14 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
mance. However, this would require prior knowledge of the<br />
chromosomal location of the genes controll<strong>in</strong>g the traits of<br />
<strong>in</strong>terest through quantitative trait loci (QTL) analysis and this<br />
<strong>in</strong>formation may not be readily available <strong>in</strong> many crop breed<strong>in</strong>g<br />
programs. Furthermore, QTL expression could vary with<br />
both genetic background and environment (Redoña and Mackill<br />
1996). Hence, hybrid rice breeders would be required to work<br />
on a specific set of germplasm, under a given environment,<br />
thereby limit<strong>in</strong>g the general usefulness and applicability of<br />
marker data for heterosis prediction <strong>in</strong> rice.<br />
References<br />
Liu XC, Wu JL. 1998. SSR heterogenic patterns of parents for mark<strong>in</strong>g<br />
and predict<strong>in</strong>g heterosis <strong>in</strong> rice breed<strong>in</strong>g. Mol. Breed.<br />
4:263-268.<br />
Redoña ED, Mackill DJ. 1996. Quantitative trait locus analysis of<br />
rice seedl<strong>in</strong>g vigor <strong>in</strong> japonica and <strong>in</strong>dica genetic backgrounds.<br />
Int. <strong>Rice</strong> Res. Notes 21:16-17.<br />
Redoña ED, Ocampo TD, Hipolito LR, Sebastian LS. 1998. Classification<br />
of cytoplasmic male-sterile rice l<strong>in</strong>es based on RAPDs,<br />
SSRs, and AFLPs. In: Lark<strong>in</strong> PJ, editor. Agricultural biotechnology:<br />
laboratory, field and market. Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs of the 4th<br />
Asia-Pacific Conference on Agricultural Biotechnology.<br />
Canberra (Australia): UTC Publish<strong>in</strong>g. p 87-89.<br />
Rohlf FJ. 1990. NTSYS-pc. New York (USA): Applied Biostatistics,<br />
Inc.<br />
Saghai Maroof MA, Yang GP, Zhang Q, Gravois KA. 1997. Correlation<br />
between molecular marker distance and hybrid performance<br />
<strong>in</strong> U.S. southern long gra<strong>in</strong> rice. Crop Sci. 37:145-<br />
150.<br />
Yang GP, Saghai Maroof MA, Xu CG, Zhang Q, Biyashev RM. 1994.<br />
Comparative analysis of microsatellite DNA polymorphism<br />
<strong>in</strong> landraces and cultivars of rice. Mol. Gen. Genet. 24:187-<br />
194.<br />
Zhang Q, Zhou ZQ, Yang GP, Xu CG, Liu KD, Saghai Maroof MA.<br />
1996. Molecular marker heterozygosity and hybrid performance<br />
<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>dica and japonica rice. Theor. Appl. Genet.<br />
93:1218-1224.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ address: Plant Breed<strong>in</strong>g and Biotechnology Division, Philipp<strong>in</strong>e<br />
<strong>Rice</strong> Research Institute (Phil<strong>Rice</strong>), Maligaya, Muñoz,<br />
Nueva Ecija 3119, Philipp<strong>in</strong>es.<br />
Stable high-yield<strong>in</strong>g ability of japonica-<strong>in</strong>dica hybrid rice<br />
T. Takita, K. Terashima, N. Yokogami, and T. Kataoka<br />
This report proves the stable high-yield<strong>in</strong>g ability of japonica-<strong>in</strong>dica hybrid rice. We developed japonica l<strong>in</strong>e TML1<br />
with the S-5 n gene from a comb<strong>in</strong>ation of Kyukei 890/Nekken 2, which efficiently reduced spikelet sterility of the<br />
japonica-<strong>in</strong>dica hybrid. THR1 and THR3 hybrids were developed by cross<strong>in</strong>g japonica CMS l<strong>in</strong>e ms-TML1 and<br />
<strong>in</strong>dica cultivars Habataki and Ukei 581. THR1 had the highest yield of brown rice over 3 y, averag<strong>in</strong>g 37% higher<br />
than that of the japonica check Nipponbare. Heterobeltiosis was observed <strong>in</strong> panicle weight and straw weight.<br />
THR3 showed similar trends with 17% higher yield than the japonica check Haenuki <strong>in</strong> tests over 2 y. Under high<br />
N, THR3 yielded 8.2 t ha –1 , 19% higher than the highest-yield<strong>in</strong>g check, Fukuhibiki. The yield of the paternal<br />
<strong>in</strong>dica l<strong>in</strong>e Ukei 581 was almost the same as that of the japonica variety. The japonica-<strong>in</strong>dica hybrids showed<br />
good plant type, large panicles, and large s<strong>in</strong>k size like the paternal <strong>in</strong>dica variety. In addition, they showed<br />
strong lodg<strong>in</strong>g resistance and late leaf and panicle senescence like the maternal japonica variety. The japonica<strong>in</strong>dica<br />
hybrids were high-yield<strong>in</strong>g, with comb<strong>in</strong>ed good characteristics of both japonica and <strong>in</strong>dica varieties.<br />
Hybrid rice is expected to be high-yield<strong>in</strong>g. S<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>in</strong>dica rice<br />
is not well adapted <strong>in</strong> Japan and significant hybrid vigor is not<br />
observed <strong>in</strong> japonica hybrids, japonica-<strong>in</strong>dica hybrids may thus<br />
be suitable <strong>in</strong> the country (Maruyama 1989). Although hybrid<br />
sterility has been a problem <strong>in</strong> japonica-<strong>in</strong>dica hybrids, it has<br />
been solved by the discovery of the S-5 n gene, which efficiently<br />
reduces spikelet sterility (Ikehashi and Araki 1986). Hence,<br />
hybrids can have normal gra<strong>in</strong> ripen<strong>in</strong>g when one of the parents<br />
has the S-5 n gene. Kabaki et al (1992) found that japonica<strong>in</strong>dica<br />
hybrids have the potential to achieve super high yield.<br />
However, stable super high yields have not been achieved <strong>in</strong><br />
hybrids so far. So, we first developed high-yield<strong>in</strong>g japonica<strong>in</strong>dica<br />
hybrids and then exam<strong>in</strong>ed the factors affect<strong>in</strong>g the stability<br />
of high yield.<br />
Materials and methods<br />
We first developed an improved japonica l<strong>in</strong>e—TML1 with<br />
the S-5 n gene from Kyukei 890/Nekken 2. Kyukei 890 is a<br />
japonica-type l<strong>in</strong>e from Suweon 258/Ta<strong>in</strong>ung 67, whereas<br />
Nekken 2 is a japonica l<strong>in</strong>e with the S-5 n gene, which was<br />
developed by Ikehashi and Araki (1986). We then produced<br />
the male sterile l<strong>in</strong>e ms-TML1 by us<strong>in</strong>g a cytoplasmic male<br />
sterile (CMS) l<strong>in</strong>e developed by Sh<strong>in</strong>jo (1975). The CMS l<strong>in</strong>e<br />
had the cytoplasm of Ch<strong>in</strong>surah Boro II and the nucleus of the<br />
japonica l<strong>in</strong>e TML1. Japonica-<strong>in</strong>dica hybrids THR1 and THR3<br />
were developed by cross<strong>in</strong>g ms-TML1 and <strong>in</strong>dicas Habataki<br />
and Ukei 581, respectively. The paternal <strong>in</strong>dica Habataki is a<br />
very high-yield<strong>in</strong>g variety developed <strong>in</strong> Japan. In contrast, the<br />
<strong>Genetics</strong> and breed<strong>in</strong>g of agronomic traits 15
paternal <strong>in</strong>dica Ukei 581 is a breed<strong>in</strong>g l<strong>in</strong>e developed from a<br />
comb<strong>in</strong>ation between Ch<strong>in</strong>ese <strong>in</strong>dica varieties.<br />
Yield trials were conducted for THR1 <strong>in</strong> 1994-96 <strong>in</strong><br />
Miyazaki and for THR3 <strong>in</strong> 1998-99 <strong>in</strong> Omagari with two replications<br />
us<strong>in</strong>g a standard cultivation method (N level: 90 kg<br />
ha –1 ). In addition, yield trials were conducted under very high<br />
N (150 kg ha –1 ) <strong>in</strong> 1999.<br />
Results and discussion<br />
THR1 had the highest brown rice yield every year <strong>in</strong> tests over<br />
3 y with an average yield 37% higher than that of the japonica<br />
check Nipponbare (Table 1). In contrast, the paternal <strong>in</strong>dica<br />
variety Habataki showed a 15% higher yield than the japonica<br />
variety, with almost the same yield as the japonica under cool<br />
weather. Heterobeltiosis was observed <strong>in</strong> panicle weight and<br />
straw weight.<br />
Table 1. Yield (t ha –1 ) of japonica-<strong>in</strong>dica hybrid THR1. a<br />
Variety Type 1994 1995 1996 Av (%)<br />
THR1 (P 1 /P 2 ) Hybrid 7.2 7.2 6.6 7.0 (137)<br />
Habataki (P 2 ) Indica 6.3 6.3 5.1 5.9 (115)<br />
Nipponbare (check) Japonica 4.9 5.6 5.1 5.1 (100)<br />
a N level = standard (90 kg ha –1 ), ripen<strong>in</strong>g condition for 1994 = hot, 1995 = medium,<br />
1996 = cool.<br />
Table 2. Yield (t ha –1 ) of japonica-<strong>in</strong>dica hybrid THR3. a<br />
Variety Type 1998 1999 Av (%)<br />
THR3 Hybrid 55.6 62.8 59.2 (117)<br />
Ukei 581 Indica 43.6 58.3 51.0 (101)<br />
Haenuki (check) Japonica 47.1 54.0 50.6 (100)<br />
a N level = standard (90 kg ha –1 ). THR3 = ms-TML1/Ukei 581 (japonica-<strong>in</strong>dica hybrid).<br />
Ripen<strong>in</strong>g condition for 1998 = cool, 1999 = hot.<br />
THR3 also had high yields, which were 17% higher than<br />
that of the japonica check Haenuki <strong>in</strong> 2-y tests (Table 2). The<br />
yield of paternal <strong>in</strong>dica Ukei 581 was obviously lower <strong>in</strong> a<br />
cool-weather year and higher <strong>in</strong> a hot-weather year and was<br />
almost the same as that of the japonica variety on average.<br />
Under high-N conditions, the yield of THR3 was extraord<strong>in</strong>arily<br />
high and reached 8.2 t ha –1 or 19% higher than<br />
that of the highest-yield<strong>in</strong>g check, Fukuhibiki (Table 3). The<br />
yield of the paternal <strong>in</strong>dica l<strong>in</strong>e Ukei 581 was almost the same<br />
as that of the japonica variety.<br />
The japonica-<strong>in</strong>dica hybrids showed good plant type,<br />
large panicles, and large s<strong>in</strong>k size before and dur<strong>in</strong>g head<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
These hybrids also exhibited strong lodg<strong>in</strong>g resistance and late<br />
leaf and panicle senescence. It can be concluded that japonica<strong>in</strong>dica<br />
hybrids can be high-yield<strong>in</strong>g because of the comb<strong>in</strong>ation<br />
of good characteristics of both japonica and <strong>in</strong>dica varieties<br />
(Table 4).<br />
References<br />
Ikehashi H, Araki H. 1986. <strong>Genetics</strong> of F 1 sterility <strong>in</strong> remote crosses<br />
of rice. Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs of the <strong>International</strong> <strong>Rice</strong> <strong>Genetics</strong> Symposium.<br />
Los Baños (Philipp<strong>in</strong>es): <strong>International</strong> <strong>Rice</strong> Research<br />
Institute. p 119-130.<br />
Kabaki N, Hasegawa H, Yamaguchi H, Kon T. 1992. Growth and<br />
yield of japonica-<strong>in</strong>dica hybrid rice. Bull. Hokuriku Natl.<br />
Agric. Exp. Stn. 34:111-139.<br />
Maruyama K. 1989. Hybrid rice breed<strong>in</strong>g. Nogyo Gijutsu 44:183-<br />
188. (In Japanese.)<br />
Sh<strong>in</strong>jo C. 1975. Genetic studies of cytoplasmic male sterility and<br />
fertility restoration <strong>in</strong> rice. Sci. Bull. Coll. Univ. Ryukyus 22:1-<br />
57.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ address: Tohoku National Agricultural Experiment Station,<br />
Omagari 014-0102, Japan.<br />
Table 3. High-yield<strong>in</strong>g ability of THR3 at high N level. a<br />
Head<strong>in</strong>g Culm Panicles Total 1,000-gra<strong>in</strong> % of Yield<br />
Variety time length m –2 weight weight ripened (t ha –1 )<br />
(date) (cm) (no.) (t ha –1 ) (g) gra<strong>in</strong>s<br />
THR3 2 Aug 86 336 20.9 23.5 75 8.2 (119)<br />
Ukei 581 6 Aug 83 281 18.5 21.7 76 6.7 ( 98)<br />
Fukuhibiki 2 Aug 88 380 17.5 22.7 77 6.9 (100)<br />
(check)<br />
a Transplant<strong>in</strong>g date = 17 May, N level = 150 kg ha –1 , Fukuhibiki = very high-yield<strong>in</strong>g japonica.<br />
Table 4. Comb<strong>in</strong>ation of important traits <strong>in</strong> japonica-<strong>in</strong>dica hybrids. a<br />
Type Tolerance for Plant S<strong>in</strong>k Gra<strong>in</strong>- Leaf Yield<strong>in</strong>g<br />
low temperature type size ripen<strong>in</strong>g period senescence ability<br />
Hybrid (J/I) ◦ tolerant ◦ ◦ ◦ long ◦ late stable<br />
Japonica (J) ◦ tolerant ◦ long ◦ late <br />
Indica (I) susceptible ◦ ◦ short early <br />
a = very good, ◦ = good, = moderate, = bad.<br />
16 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
Inheritance of fertility restoration of WA cytoplasm<br />
<strong>in</strong> sodic-tolerant rice hybrids<br />
A. Jauhar Ali, S.E. Na<strong>in</strong>a Mohammed, R. Rajagopalan, and C.H.M. Vijayakumar<br />
A study was conducted on fertility restoration of wild abortive (WA) cytoplasm under reclaimed sodic soils of five<br />
promis<strong>in</strong>g sodic-tolerant hybrids. These selected sodic-tolerant hybrids were screened <strong>in</strong> sodic soils with pH 9.2<br />
and EC 0.25 dS m –1 before they were studied for the F 2<br />
<strong>in</strong>heritance pattern under reclaimed sodic soils. The<br />
male sterile l<strong>in</strong>es IR58025A and Pusa 5A, which were moderately sodic-tolerant when screened under sodic<br />
soils with pH 9.0 and EC 0.25 dS m –1 , were found to be one of the common female parents of all the sodictolerant<br />
hybrids studied. Pollen fertility percentage was worked out on an <strong>in</strong>dividual plant basis for each cross<br />
separately by sta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the pollen with IKI (1%) and observ<strong>in</strong>g samples under the microscope. The F 2<br />
segregation<br />
pattern for all the crosses fitted well for 15 fertile:1 sterile by chi-square analysis, <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g a duplicate dom<strong>in</strong>ant<br />
epistasis <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g two genes similar to earlier f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs. Sodic-tolerant restorers are be<strong>in</strong>g identified, male<br />
sterile l<strong>in</strong>es are be<strong>in</strong>g converted <strong>in</strong> the background of sodic-tolerant varieties, and they are be<strong>in</strong>g used to<br />
develop sodic-tolerant rice hybrids.<br />
Hybrid rice cultivation <strong>in</strong> problem soils was first attempted <strong>in</strong><br />
1995 under sodic soils but with little success s<strong>in</strong>ce tolerance<br />
of sodicity is a complex problem. Most of the genes for sodicity<br />
tolerance complement each other <strong>in</strong> the early phase, but fail to<br />
complement each other <strong>in</strong> the last phase, that is, from flower<strong>in</strong>g<br />
to maturity, when yield levels fall drastically (Ali et al 1996).<br />
In India, the area under problem soils is nearly 11 million ha,<br />
with about 0.42 million ha <strong>in</strong> Tamil Nadu. Hybrid rice technology,<br />
if especially tailored to meet the requirements, can be<br />
extended to sodic soils. Sodic-tolerant hybrid rice can be developed<br />
by mak<strong>in</strong>g both parents, A (male sterile) and R (restorer),<br />
sodic-tolerant (Ali et al 1996, 1998). Only certa<strong>in</strong> hybrid<br />
comb<strong>in</strong>ations were found to be suitable for sodic soils,<br />
especially those that could complement their sodicity tolerance<br />
traits favorably. Stable sodic-tolerant, male sterile ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>er<br />
and restorer l<strong>in</strong>es are needed. The restoration of male<br />
fertility <strong>in</strong> the F 1 is an important phenomenon by which the<br />
success of the hybrid ultimately depends. Therefore, studies<br />
on the genetics of fertility restoration can lead to proper understand<strong>in</strong>g<br />
of this important phenomenon, especially when<br />
the search is for sodic-tolerant restorer l<strong>in</strong>es.<br />
Materials and methods<br />
A total of 26 male sterile l<strong>in</strong>es represent<strong>in</strong>g diverse cytoplasmic<br />
male sterility sources, such as wild abortive, O. perennis,<br />
and MS 577A, were screened under sodic soils with pH 9.2<br />
and EC 0.25 dS m –1 dur<strong>in</strong>g the 1998 wet season. Sodicity tolerance<br />
was scored for phenotypic acceptability (PACP) immediately<br />
after sow<strong>in</strong>g, that is, at germ<strong>in</strong>ation (3–5 d after<br />
emergence), seedl<strong>in</strong>g, tiller<strong>in</strong>g, flower<strong>in</strong>g, and harvest (maturity),<br />
us<strong>in</strong>g a 0–9 scale, with 9 be<strong>in</strong>g the most susceptible reaction<br />
<strong>in</strong> terms of poor germ<strong>in</strong>ation, seedl<strong>in</strong>g vigor, tiller<strong>in</strong>g,<br />
flower<strong>in</strong>g, and maturity (spikelet fertility) and 1 <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g that<br />
plants are sodic-tolerant.<br />
Five highly sodic-tolerant experimental hybrids were<br />
selected based on high pollen and spikelet fertility from 120<br />
testcrosses screened under sodic soils with pH 9.2 and EC 0.25<br />
dS m –1 . Pollen fertility was tested by sta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the pollen <strong>in</strong> 1%<br />
potassium iodide (IKI) from five random spikelets of <strong>in</strong>dividual<br />
plants. Other unsta<strong>in</strong>ed or partially sta<strong>in</strong>ed shriveled or round<br />
pollen types were considered as sterile. For each hybrid comb<strong>in</strong>ation,<br />
the segregation pattern was studied <strong>in</strong>dividually by<br />
plant and chi-square analysis was carried out to test the segregation<br />
ratios.<br />
Results and discussion<br />
Among the CMS and ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>er l<strong>in</strong>es screened, IR58025A,<br />
IR62829A, IR66707A (O. perennis cytoplasm), IR68281A,<br />
IR68890A, IR68891A, IR68895A, IR68899A, Pusa 5A, and<br />
their respective ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>er l<strong>in</strong>es were found to be moderately<br />
tolerant <strong>in</strong> all five stages—germ<strong>in</strong>ation, seedl<strong>in</strong>g, tiller<strong>in</strong>g,<br />
flower<strong>in</strong>g, and harvest (maturity). The phenotypic acceptability<br />
score was 3, which was comparable with that of the local<br />
sodic-tolerant check, TRY 1. There was no significant difference<br />
between male sterile l<strong>in</strong>es and their respective ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>er<br />
l<strong>in</strong>es except <strong>in</strong> PMS 3A, which showed better sodicity tolerance<br />
than its ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>er l<strong>in</strong>e, clearly <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g no cytoplasmic<br />
<strong>in</strong>fluence on either susceptibility or resistance (Table 1).<br />
Male sterile IR66707A (O. perennis cytoplasm) and its ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>er<br />
l<strong>in</strong>e showed moderate tolerance for sodicity, whereas<br />
MS 37A (MS 577A cytoplasm) and its ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>er l<strong>in</strong>e were<br />
not tolerant of sodicity.<br />
Of the 120 testcrosses (IR58025A and Pusa 5A, with a<br />
sodic-tolerant source nursery) that were screened under sodic<br />
soils with pH 9.2 and EC 0.27 dS m –1 , only the five most promis<strong>in</strong>g<br />
F 1 hybrid comb<strong>in</strong>ations with high yields under sodicity<br />
stress were selected for their F 2 segregation pattern. The F 2<br />
segregation for the restoration of WA cytoplasm for all five<br />
superior hybrids fitted well for a 15 fertile:1 sterile (Table 2),<br />
<strong>Genetics</strong> and breed<strong>in</strong>g of agronomic traits 17
Table 1. Screen<strong>in</strong>g of different cytoplasmic male sterile l<strong>in</strong>es and their ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>er<br />
l<strong>in</strong>es under sodic soils.<br />
Phenotypic<br />
acceptability score<br />
over five stages<br />
CMS and ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>er l<strong>in</strong>es a<br />
3 IR58025A/B, IR62829A/B, IR66707A*/B, Pusa 5A/B, IR68281A/<br />
B, IR68899A/B, IR68890A/B, IR68891A/B, IR68895A/B, PMS<br />
5A/B, PMS 3A, TRY 1 (check)<br />
5 PMS 3B<br />
7 IR67683A/B, PMS 8A/B, DRR 3A/B, PMS 9B, PMS 10B, V20B,<br />
IR68275B, IR68280B<br />
9 MS 37A**/B, IR68902A/B, IR68897A/B, IR68888A/B,<br />
IR68887A/B, IR68279A/B, ZS 97A/B, IR64607A/B, PMS 9A,<br />
PMS 10A, V20A, IR68275A, IR68280A<br />
a *= O. perennis sterile cytoplasm. ** = MS577A sterile cytoplasm.<br />
Table 2. Pollen and spikelet fertility <strong>in</strong> F 1 s and F 2 s derived from crosses of CMS l<strong>in</strong>es (WA cytoplasm) with<br />
different restorers.<br />
Fertility (%) <strong>in</strong> F 1 F 2 plants (no.)<br />
Hybrid Cross Expected Probability<br />
Pollen Spikelet Fertile Sterile ratio<br />
pollen pollen<br />
TRYRH 98019 IR58025A/NSASN 2434 76.5 95.8 78 5 15:1 0.93<br />
TRYRH 98045 IR58025A/IR55178-B-B-B-25-1 70.8 86.0 90 8 15:1 0.43<br />
TRYRH 98067 IR58025A/C 20 R 79.3 90.3 29 1 15:1 0.51<br />
TRYRH 98198 Pusa 5A/IR55178-B-B-B-2-1 70.0 84.1 29 1 15:1 0.51<br />
TRYRH 98210 Pusa 5A/C 20 R 70.5 85.4 28 2 15:1 0.93<br />
<strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g a duplicate dom<strong>in</strong>ant epistasis <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g two genes.<br />
Several workers have reported that fertility restoration of WA<br />
cytoplasm is controlled by two dom<strong>in</strong>ant genes (Zhou et al<br />
1983, Virmani et al 1986, Gov<strong>in</strong>da Raj and Virmani 1988). Of<br />
the two genes, one is stronger than the other for fertility restoration.<br />
Allelic studies between sodic-tolerant and susceptible<br />
restorers thus need to be carried out. To develop sodic-tolerant<br />
rice hybrids, apart from identify<strong>in</strong>g sodic-tolerant restorers,<br />
conversion of male sterile l<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong> the background of sodictolerant<br />
varieties is be<strong>in</strong>g carried out.<br />
References<br />
Ali AJ, Rangaswamy M, Rajagopalan R, Mohammed SEN,<br />
Manickam TS. 1998. TNRH 16: a salt-tolerant rice hybrid.<br />
Int. <strong>Rice</strong> Res. Notes 23(2):22.<br />
Ali AJ, Rangaswamy M, Rajagopalan R, Na<strong>in</strong>a Mohammed SE. 1996.<br />
Hybrid rice for salt-affected soils. TNAU Newsl. 25(12):2.<br />
Gov<strong>in</strong>da Raj K, Virmani SS. 1988. <strong>Genetics</strong> of fertility restoration<br />
of WA-type cytoplasmic male sterility <strong>in</strong> rice. Crop Sci. 28:787-<br />
792.<br />
Virmani SS, Gov<strong>in</strong>da Raj K, Casal C, Dalmacio RD, Aur<strong>in</strong> PA. 1986.<br />
Current knowledge of and outlook on cytoplasmic genetic male<br />
sterility and fertility and restoration <strong>in</strong> rice. In: <strong>Rice</strong> genetics.<br />
Manila (Philipp<strong>in</strong>es): <strong>International</strong> <strong>Rice</strong> Research Institute.<br />
p 633-647.<br />
Zhou TL, Shen JH, Ye FC. 1983. A genetic analysis on the fertility<br />
of Shan-type hybrid rice with wild rice cytoplasm. Acta Agron.<br />
S<strong>in</strong>. 9(4):241-247.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ addresses: A. Jauhar Ali, S.E. Na<strong>in</strong>a Mohammed, and R.<br />
Rajagopalan, Agricultural College and Research Institute,<br />
Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Tiruchirapalli 620 009;<br />
C.H.M. Vijayakumar, Directorate of <strong>Rice</strong> Research, Hyderabad<br />
500 030, India.<br />
18 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
Genetic analysis of temperature-sensitive genic<br />
male sterility <strong>in</strong> rice<br />
A. Jauhar Ali, S.E. Na<strong>in</strong>a Mohammed, R. Rajagopalan, and C.H.M. Vijayakumar<br />
Crosses were made between two TGMS l<strong>in</strong>es, ID24 × SM5 and IC10 × JPs4. The F 1<br />
s had completely normal<br />
pollen and spikelet fertility under high temperature (35 °C day/26 °C night). The F 2<br />
s showed a 9 fertile:7 sterile<br />
ratio, <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g that the character is governed by two separate genes. Pollen sterility <strong>in</strong> the F 2<br />
ranged from<br />
completely sterile to 27% sterility, <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g the effect of modifier genes under high-temperature regimes (dur<strong>in</strong>g<br />
April 1998 at Tiruchirapalli, India). Testcrosses made between TGMS and non-TGMS l<strong>in</strong>es were used to<br />
determ<strong>in</strong>e the F 2<br />
segregation pattern under higher temperature. The eight most promis<strong>in</strong>g F 1<br />
s based on their<br />
yield performance were selected and F 2<br />
segregation under high temperature was carried out for pollen fertility.<br />
The F 2<br />
segregated <strong>in</strong>to a 3 fertile:1 sterile (TGMS) ratio under high temperature (>35.5 °C day and >25.6 °C<br />
night), <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g that the TGMS trait is governed by a s<strong>in</strong>gle gene.<br />
The discovery of environment-sensitive genic male sterility<br />
(EGMS) <strong>in</strong> rice led to the development of a simple and highly<br />
efficient two-l<strong>in</strong>e hybrid breed<strong>in</strong>g system. Different sources<br />
of photoperiod-sensitive genic male sterility (PGMS) and<br />
thermosensitive genic male sterility (TGMS) have been developed<br />
<strong>in</strong> various countries—Ch<strong>in</strong>a, Japan, India, and the<br />
Philipp<strong>in</strong>es (<strong>IRRI</strong>). The TGMS system is more useful than the<br />
PGMS system <strong>in</strong> the tropics, where daylength differences are<br />
marg<strong>in</strong>al. TGMS l<strong>in</strong>es grown under high temperature (i.e., >30<br />
°C day/>24 °C night) become completely male sterile. When<br />
raised under lower temperature regimes (such as 24 °C day/<br />
>16 °C night temperatures), they become fertile. TGMS l<strong>in</strong>es<br />
are sensitive to such temperatures dur<strong>in</strong>g stages II to IV of the<br />
panicle developmental phase (16–24 d before head<strong>in</strong>g). The<br />
TGMS-based two-l<strong>in</strong>e approach for produc<strong>in</strong>g hybrid seed<br />
does not require any class of restorers s<strong>in</strong>ce 95% of the varieties<br />
restore the fertility of the F 1 . Furthermore, the cytoplasm is<br />
not <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> the sterility expression, thus reduc<strong>in</strong>g the risk<br />
of potential genetic vulnerability. The PGMS <strong>in</strong> Nongken 58s<br />
and its derivative l<strong>in</strong>es was found to be governed by a pair of<br />
recessive genes, whereas the TGMS trait <strong>in</strong> 5460s (Sun et al<br />
1989), R59TS (Yang et al 1990), H89-1 (Nor<strong>in</strong> PL 12)<br />
(Maruyama et al 1991), and SA 2 (Ali 1996, Ali et al 1995)<br />
was controlled by a s<strong>in</strong>gle recessive gene. Information on <strong>in</strong>heritance<br />
of the TGMS trait is limited to a few sources. This<br />
study was undertaken us<strong>in</strong>g a larger number of hybrid comb<strong>in</strong>ations<br />
(TGMS × non-TGMS) with different TGMS sources<br />
and also to exam<strong>in</strong>e the allelic relationships among certa<strong>in</strong><br />
TGMS sources.<br />
Materials and methods<br />
Four TGMS l<strong>in</strong>es—ID24, IC10, SM5, and JPs4—from the<br />
Directorate of <strong>Rice</strong> Research, Hyderabad, India, were used to<br />
study allelic relationships. Crosses were made by treat<strong>in</strong>g these<br />
l<strong>in</strong>es under natural temperatures dur<strong>in</strong>g the sensitive stage (i.e.,<br />
16 to 24 d before head<strong>in</strong>g dur<strong>in</strong>g November and December<br />
when the temperatures at Tiruchirapalli, India, were about 29<br />
°C day/23 °C night). This resulted <strong>in</strong> ID24 and IC10 becom<strong>in</strong>g<br />
completely pollen sterile and SM5 and JPs4 becom<strong>in</strong>g<br />
partially pollen fertile. The critical sterility po<strong>in</strong>t (CSP) of ID24<br />
and IC10 was relatively lower than that of SM5 and JPs4. The<br />
F 1 s were raised dur<strong>in</strong>g the wet season <strong>in</strong> separate rows. Likewise,<br />
the F 2 generation of the two crosses was raised under<br />
high temperature (>32 °C day/>26 °C night ) dur<strong>in</strong>g April and<br />
May. Pollen fertility was exam<strong>in</strong>ed by smear<strong>in</strong>g anthers of five<br />
spikelets with 1% IKI sta<strong>in</strong> under a light microscope.<br />
Of 116 testcrosses made between TGMS and non-TGMS<br />
l<strong>in</strong>es, only eight were selected based on their high pollen and<br />
spikelet fertility and yield per plant (averaged over 10 plants)<br />
<strong>in</strong> the F 1 . Sources such as JP2, SM5, Xiang 125-5-11, IR68945,<br />
TS 10/1, and TS 012 were used. Likewise, the F 2 was raised<br />
dur<strong>in</strong>g April and May, when the temperatures were high (>32<br />
°C day/>26 °C night). Pollen fertility was studied for each <strong>in</strong>dividual<br />
segregat<strong>in</strong>g plant <strong>in</strong> the F 2 .<br />
Results and discussion<br />
When crosses were made between TGMS × TGMS l<strong>in</strong>es (i.e.,<br />
ID24 × SM5 and IC10 × JPs4), the F 1 s were completely normal<br />
for pollen and spikelet fertility under high-temperature<br />
conditions (Table 1). For both crosses, the F 2 showed a ratio<br />
of 9 fertile:7 sterile (probability % 0.50–0.30), <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g that<br />
the character is governed by two separate genes. S<strong>in</strong>ce ID24<br />
carries the tms 1 allele (Reddy 1997), SM5 must carry a different<br />
allele. Likewise, IC10 is already known to carry tms 3 , fur-<br />
Table 1. Pollen and spikelet fertility <strong>in</strong> F 1 and F 2 derived from crosses<br />
of two TGMS parents.<br />
Cross<br />
F 1 fertility F 2 with plants<br />
(%) (no.)<br />
Expected Probability<br />
Pollen Spikelet Fertile Sterile ratio<br />
pollen pollen<br />
ID24/SM5 95.0 85.0 39 25 9:7 0.95<br />
IC10/JPs4 99.5 87.0 42 27 9:7 0.44<br />
<strong>Genetics</strong> and breed<strong>in</strong>g of agronomic traits 19
Table 2. Genetic analysis of pollen and spikelet fertility <strong>in</strong> F 1 and F 2 derived from<br />
crosses of TGMS × non-TGMS parents.<br />
F 1 fertility (%) F 2 with plants (no.)<br />
Cross comb<strong>in</strong>ation Expected Probability<br />
Pollen Spikelet Fertile Sterile ratio<br />
pollen pollen<br />
Xiang 125-5-11/ 91.0 89.0 56 19 3:1 0.95<br />
IR37255-21-3-3-2<br />
JP2/Pokkali 82.0 80.0 59 17 3:1 0.60<br />
JP2/Lunishree 90.0 88.0 58 17 3:1 0.72<br />
IR68945/CSR11 92.0 86.0 56 19 3:1 0.95<br />
SM5/AS89044 87.0 90.0 55 17 3:1 0.78<br />
JP2/CR1009 88.0 91.0 55 20 3:1 0.72<br />
TS10/1 × ADT 49 92.0 85.0 52 16 3:1 0.78<br />
TS12/AD 9018 91.0 84.0 56 16 3:1 0.78<br />
ther <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g that JPs4 carries a different allele. Pollen sterility<br />
<strong>in</strong> F 2 segregants ranged from completely sterile to 27%<br />
pollen sterility, <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g the effect of modifier genes under<br />
high-temperature regimes (35 °C day/26 °C night temperatures)<br />
dur<strong>in</strong>g April 1998 at Tiruchirapalli. The identification<br />
of different TGMS genes <strong>in</strong> rice provides hybrid rice breeders<br />
with diverse sources for develop<strong>in</strong>g two-l<strong>in</strong>e rice hybrids.<br />
The eight most promis<strong>in</strong>g F 1 s based on yield performance<br />
were selected and their F 2 segregation patterns under<br />
high temperature were studied by analyz<strong>in</strong>g pollen fertility.<br />
The chi-square test revealed that the F 2 segregation fitted well<br />
with a ratio of 3 fertile:1 sterile (Table 2) under high temperature<br />
(>35.5 °C day and >25.6 °C night). This <strong>in</strong>dicated that<br />
the TGMS trait was governed by a s<strong>in</strong>gle gene follow<strong>in</strong>g a<br />
monogenic <strong>in</strong>heritance pattern similar to earlier f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs (Sun<br />
et al 1989, Yang et al 1990, Maruyama et al 1991, Ali 1996).<br />
This confirmed that, <strong>in</strong> most TGMS sources studied, the trait<br />
is governed by a s<strong>in</strong>gle recessive gene.<br />
References<br />
Ali J. 1996. Studies on temperature sensitive genetic male sterility<br />
and chemical-<strong>in</strong>duced sterility towards development of twol<strong>in</strong>e<br />
hybrids <strong>in</strong> rice (Oryza sativa L.). PhD thesis. Indian Agricultural<br />
Research Institute, New Delhi, India.<br />
Ali J, Siddiq EA, Zaman FU, Abraham MJ, Ahmed IM. 1995. Identification<br />
and characterization of temperature sensitive genic<br />
male sterile sources <strong>in</strong> rice (Oryza sativa L.). Indian J. Genet.<br />
55:243-259.<br />
Maruyama K, Araki H, Kato H. 1991. Thermosensitive genetic male<br />
sterility <strong>in</strong>duced by irradiation. In: <strong>Rice</strong> genetics II. <strong>International</strong><br />
<strong>Rice</strong> Research Institute, Los Baños, Philipp<strong>in</strong>es. p 227-<br />
235.<br />
Reddy OUK. 1997. Physiological and molecular characterization and<br />
genetics of temperature sensitive genic male sterile sources<br />
for heterosis breed<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> rice. PhD thesis. Osmania University,<br />
Hyderabad, India.<br />
Sun ZX, Xiong ZM, M<strong>in</strong> SK, Si HM. 1989. Identification of the<br />
temperature-sensitive male sterile rice. Ch<strong>in</strong>ese J. <strong>Rice</strong> Sci.<br />
3(2):49-55.<br />
Yang RC, Wang NY, Mang K, Chan Q, Yang RR, Chen S. 1990.<br />
Prelim<strong>in</strong>ary studies on application of <strong>in</strong>dica photo (thermo)<br />
sensitive genic male sterile 5460 S <strong>in</strong> hybrid rice breed<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
Hybrid <strong>Rice</strong> 1:32-34.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ addresses: A. Jauhar Ali, S.E. Na<strong>in</strong>a Mohammed, R.<br />
Rajagopalan, Agricultural College and Research Institute,<br />
Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Tiruchirapalli 620 009;<br />
C.H.M. Vijayakumar, Directorate of <strong>Rice</strong> Research, Hyderabad<br />
500 030, India.<br />
Complexity of <strong>in</strong>heritance of thermosensitive genic<br />
male sterility <strong>in</strong> rice<br />
R.B. Li and M.P. Pandey<br />
Thermosensitive genic male sterility (TGMS) <strong>in</strong> rice is a critical trait for exploit<strong>in</strong>g heterosis, especially of an<br />
<strong>in</strong>tersubspecific nature, us<strong>in</strong>g the two-l<strong>in</strong>e system. In contrast to the reports of its simple and monogenic <strong>in</strong>heritance,<br />
the trait is complexly <strong>in</strong>herited. Hybrids of TGMS l<strong>in</strong>e UPRI 95-140TGMS with 44 normal male fertile l<strong>in</strong>es<br />
offered evidence that the genetic background modified the segregation ratios and at least three pairs of major<br />
genes were <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> TGMS expression. Detailed studies showed that most of the monogenic (3F, fertile:1S,<br />
sterile) and digenic (15F:1S) segregation ratios could be resolved <strong>in</strong>to 12 fertile:3 partially sterile:1 completely<br />
20 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
sterile, whereas some of the digenic segregations were resolved <strong>in</strong>to a 60F:3PS:1CS ratio. A nonidentical effect<br />
of the three pairs of <strong>in</strong>dependent recessive genes on <strong>in</strong>duc<strong>in</strong>g male sterility was observed. None of the s<strong>in</strong>gle<br />
genes conferred complete male sterility. Effects of the correspond<strong>in</strong>g dom<strong>in</strong>ant genes to recover male fertility<br />
were observed and the magnitude of the first gene was 1.7 to 2.1 times that of the second gene, and the third<br />
gene was the weakest. In conclusion, the complexity of the TGMS <strong>in</strong>heritance pattern and gene expression was<br />
due to the cumulative effect of the trigenic nature of <strong>in</strong>heritance and its <strong>in</strong>teraction with the genetic background<br />
and environmental temperature.<br />
Thermosensitive genic male sterility (TGMS) is an important<br />
tool for develop<strong>in</strong>g two-l<strong>in</strong>e rice hybrids. This system is more<br />
advantageous <strong>in</strong> that it uses simpler and more economical hybrid<br />
seed production and a broader choice of male parents for<br />
enhanc<strong>in</strong>g yield potential because the ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>er and restorer<br />
genes employed <strong>in</strong> the current three-l<strong>in</strong>e hybrid breed<strong>in</strong>g system<br />
are not required. The trait has shown monogenic <strong>in</strong>heritance<br />
and three <strong>in</strong>dependent genes, tms 1 (Yang et al 1992), tms 2<br />
(Maruyama et al 1991), and tms 3 (Borkakati and Virmani<br />
1996), were reported. Few other TGMS sources have been<br />
reported. Recently, a new TGMS source, UPRI 95-140TGMS,<br />
was identified <strong>in</strong> our hybrid breed<strong>in</strong>g program (Pandey et al<br />
1998). The trait <strong>in</strong> the l<strong>in</strong>e has displayed digenic <strong>in</strong>heritance<br />
(Li and Pandey 1998, 1999). However, further <strong>in</strong>vestigations<br />
have revealed a more complicated <strong>in</strong>heritance pattern of the<br />
trait and these new f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs are reported here.<br />
Inheritance pattern of TGMS <strong>in</strong> UPRI 95-140TGMS<br />
Segregation for different fertility types<br />
The TGMS l<strong>in</strong>e UPRI 95-140TGMS, a spontaneous mutant<br />
with known fertility-sterility transformation behavior under<br />
thermosensitive temperature (Pandey et al 1998), was studied<br />
for the <strong>in</strong>heritance of its TGMS trait. F 2 populations from<br />
crosses between the TGMS l<strong>in</strong>e and 44 l<strong>in</strong>es hav<strong>in</strong>g normal<br />
male fertility were grown <strong>in</strong> the 1998 wet season (WS) at<br />
28.55–28.72 °C of mean 15-d thermosensitive temperature (15-<br />
dTT) <strong>in</strong> which the female TGMS l<strong>in</strong>e was completely male<br />
sterile. Results revealed three k<strong>in</strong>ds of segregation when 80%<br />
of the spikelet fertility criterion was adopted to ascerta<strong>in</strong> fertile<br />
and sterile plants. The three segregation ratios had a goodness<br />
of fit to the expected monogenic (3F:1S), digenic<br />
(15F:1S), and trigenic (63F:1S) ratios.<br />
Resolution of sterility segregation<br />
Four pairs of TGMS near-isogenic l<strong>in</strong>es (NILs) <strong>in</strong> elite genetic<br />
backgrounds were developed and pair-crossed. The parental,<br />
F 1 , F 2 , and TC 1 generations were space-planted under<br />
mean 15-dTT of 28.61 °C. At head<strong>in</strong>g, some of the panicles <strong>in</strong><br />
each plant were removed to promote late tiller formation and<br />
head<strong>in</strong>g at different dates to meet the condition of different<br />
environmental temperatures.<br />
Results <strong>in</strong>dicated dist<strong>in</strong>ct groups of fertile plants from<br />
sterile plants <strong>in</strong> the F 2 populations of crosses UPTRI 95-<br />
140TGMS/UPRI 95-140NIL, UPTRI 95-141NILTGMS/UPRI<br />
95-141, and UPTRI 95-140TGMS/UPRI 95-141. Observed<br />
segregations were <strong>in</strong> the ratios of 167F:48S, 93F:27S, and<br />
166F:59S, respectively. These fitted the expected ratio of<br />
3F:1S, <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g monogenic segregation <strong>in</strong> fertility/sterility.<br />
Similarly, the observed ratios, 57F:63S, 26F:19S, and 59F:61S<br />
<strong>in</strong> the TC 1 generation of the three crosses, had a goodness of<br />
fit to the expected ratio of 1:1, confirm<strong>in</strong>g monogenic <strong>in</strong>heritance.<br />
S<strong>in</strong>ce the variation <strong>in</strong> fertility with<strong>in</strong> the sterility group<br />
of the three crosses had been very large, it was further resolved<br />
<strong>in</strong>to complete sterility (identical to that of the female parent<br />
with fertility 5 but
Table 1. Segregation patterns for pollen fertility <strong>in</strong> F 2 and testcross (TC) generations of the crosses.<br />
Plants a (no.)<br />
Expected<br />
Cross comb<strong>in</strong>ation Generation ratio X 2 P value<br />
Total F PS CS<br />
UPRI 95-140TGMS/ F 2 225 166 44 15 12:3:1 0.185 0.90–0.95<br />
UPRI 95-141 TC 1 120 59 33 28 2:1:1 0.495 0.70–0.90<br />
UPRI 95-140TGMS/ F 2 215 167 33 15 12:3:1 1.713 0.25–0.50<br />
UPRI 95-140NIL TC 1 120 57 32 31 2:1:1 0.317 0.70–0.90<br />
UPRI 95-140TGMS/ F 2 358 337 14 7 60:3:1 0.804 0.50–0.70<br />
RL 253-3 TC 1 135 100 17 18 6:1:1 0.091 0.95–0.99<br />
UPRI 95-141NILTGMS/ F 2 120 93 20 7 12:3:1 0.411 0.70–0.90<br />
UPRI 95-141 TC 1 45 26 9 10 2:1:1 1.133 0.50–0.70<br />
UPRI 95-117NILTGMS/ F 2 165 152 – 13 15:1 0.747 0.25–0.50<br />
UPRI 95-117 TC 1 120 92 – 28 3:1 0.178 0.50–0.70<br />
RL 253-3NILTGMS/ F 2 348 340 – 8 63:1 1.227 0.25–0.50<br />
RL 253-3 TC 1 267 232 – 35 7:1 0.090 0.70–0.90<br />
UPRI 95-140TGMS/ F 2 120 114 – 6 15:1 0.320 0.50–0.70<br />
UPRI 95-117 TC 1 120 88 – 32 3:1 0.178 0.50–0.70<br />
a F = fertile, PS = partially sterile, and CS = completely sterile plants.<br />
Table 2. Segregation patterns for fertility <strong>in</strong> F 3 generations of crosses.<br />
Progenies (no.)<br />
Cross Group Expected X 2 P value<br />
of F 3 Total True- Segre- True- ratio<br />
progenies a breed<strong>in</strong>g gat<strong>in</strong>g breed<strong>in</strong>g<br />
(fertile) (sterile)<br />
UPRI 95-140TGMS/UPRI I 80 23 57 – 4:8 0.756 0.25–0.50<br />
95-140NIL II 30 – 21 9 2:1 0.150 0.50–0.75<br />
III 10 – 0 10 – – –<br />
UPRI 95-140TGMS/UPRI I 88 38 50 0 7:8 0.357 0.50–0.75<br />
95-117 III 12 – 0 12 – – –<br />
UPRI 95-140TGMS/UPRI I 80 24 56 – 4:8 0.400 0.50–0.75<br />
95-141 II 40 – 28 12 2:1 0.312 0.50–0.75<br />
III 15 – 0 15 – – –<br />
UPRI 95-117NILTGMS/ I 60 29 31 – 7:8 0.067 0.70–0.90<br />
UPRI 95-117 III 15 – 0 15 – – –<br />
UPRI 95-141NILTGMS/ I 80 28 52 – 4:8 0.100 0.70–0.90<br />
UPRI 95-141 II 30 – 19 11 2:1 0.150 0.50–0.70<br />
III 8 – 0 8 – – –<br />
a Groups I, II, and III are the progenies from fertile, moderately sterile, and completely sterile F 2 plants, respectively.<br />
population did not give any Group II progenies and Group I<br />
segregated for 7 true-breed<strong>in</strong>g fertile:8 segregat<strong>in</strong>g. However,<br />
for UPTRI 95-140TGMS/UPRI 95-141 and UPTRI 95-<br />
141NILTGMS/UPRI 95-141, differential expression of two<br />
dom<strong>in</strong>ant genes for male fertility was observed. The PS plants<br />
<strong>in</strong> the F 2 possessed only a s<strong>in</strong>gle major but weaker dom<strong>in</strong>ant<br />
gene, and the fertile plants were either both homozygous dom<strong>in</strong>ant<br />
or with one major and stronger dom<strong>in</strong>ant gene and another<br />
weaker homozygous recessive gene. Therefore, <strong>in</strong> the F 3<br />
generation, the Group II and Group I progenies segregated 2<br />
segregat<strong>in</strong>g:1 true-breed<strong>in</strong>g sterile progenies and 4 true-breed<strong>in</strong>g<br />
fertile:8 segregat<strong>in</strong>g progenies, respectively (Table 2).<br />
Effect of different genes on male fertility<br />
It was assumed that the TGMS trait of UPRI 95-140TGMS,<br />
the female parent, was under the control of three pairs of recessive<br />
genes, tms 5 (t 5 ), tms 6 (t 6 ), and tms 7 (t 7 ), and had the<br />
genotype t 5 t 5 t 6 t 6 t 7 t 7 with the gene effect t 5 >t 6 >t 7 for male sterility<br />
and the correspond<strong>in</strong>g genes T 5 >T 6 >T 7 for male fertility.<br />
In the TC 1 and F 2 populations of UPRI 95-140TGMS/UPRI<br />
95-140NIL and UPRI 95-140TGMS/UPRI 95-141, the genotype<br />
t 5 t 5 t 6 t 6 was completely sterile and could be dist<strong>in</strong>guished<br />
from other fertile classes (PS, MF, and F) at 28.61/25.25 °C of<br />
the mean/m<strong>in</strong>imum 15-dTT. The genotypes t 5 t 5 t 6 t 6 T 7 t 7 and<br />
t 5 t 5 t 6 t 6 t 7 t 7 were <strong>in</strong>dist<strong>in</strong>ct from each other at this temperature<br />
s<strong>in</strong>ce both were completely sterile, but they were dist<strong>in</strong>ct at<br />
the relatively lower temperature of 27.10/23.57 °C, whereas<br />
the former genotype was partially fertile and the latter completely<br />
sterile. In this way, different genotypes <strong>in</strong> different<br />
crosses were identified and their genotypic and genic effects<br />
could be analyzed.<br />
It was observed that, at the mean/m<strong>in</strong>imum temperature<br />
of 28.61/25.25 °C of 15-dTT, the gene T 7 had no <strong>in</strong>fluence on<br />
22 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
Table 3. Estimation of mean genotypic effects on fertility <strong>in</strong> the TC 1 generation at different 15-d<br />
thermosensitive temperatures.<br />
Phenotype a at<br />
Pollen fertility (%) at 15-dTT<br />
Cross Genotype 28.61/25.25 °C (°C mean/m<strong>in</strong>imum)<br />
(mean/m<strong>in</strong>imum<br />
15-dTT) 28.61/25.25 27.10/23.57 25.84/21.59<br />
UPRI 95-140TGMS// t 5 t 5 t 6 t 6 CS 0.0 ± 0.0 51.1 ± 23.5 80.3 ± 8.2<br />
UPRI 95-140TGMS/ t 5 t 5 t 6 t 6 t 7 t 7 CS 0.0 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.0 7.6 ± 4.4<br />
UPRI 95-140NIL t 5 t 5 t 6 t 6 T 7 t 7 CS 0.0 ± 0.0 53.3 ± 12.5 83.0 ± 4.5<br />
t 5 t 5 T 6 t 6 PS 45.5 ± 31.8 92.2 ± 5.1 95.4 ± 4.0<br />
T 5 t 5 t 6 t 6 MF 96.0 96.9 94.8<br />
T 5 t 5 t 6 t 6 , F (MF+HF) 97.3 ± 2.1 97.9 ± 1.8 96.3 ± 2.9<br />
T 5 t 5 T 6 t 6<br />
UPRI 95-140TGMS// t 5 t 5 t 6 t 6 CS 1.07 ± 1.65 58.4 ± 26.7 72.8 ± 22.3<br />
UPRI 95140-TGMS/ t 5 t 5 T 6 t 6 PS 48.7 ± 26.7 85.5 ± 12.3 90.4 ± 8.6<br />
UPRI 95-141 T 5 t 5 t 6 t 6 MF 93.0 91.7 91.4<br />
T 5 t 5 t 6 t 6 ,<br />
T 5 t 5 T 6 t 6 F (MF+HF) 95.4 ± 2.6 94.7 ± 3.8 94.2 ± 4.4<br />
UPRI 95-140TGMS// t 5 t 5 t 6 t 6 t 7 t 7 CS 0.8 ± 0.3 72.7 ± 31.8 84.9 ± 5.1<br />
UPRI 95-140TGMS/ t 5 t 5 t 6 t 6 T 7 t 7 PS 68.5 ± 34.2 90.6 ± 5.5 92.2 ± 3.8<br />
RL 253-3 T 5 t 5 T 6 t 6 , F (MF+HF) 95.6 ± 3.2 95.0 ± 3.8 94.7 ± 4.0<br />
t 5 t 5 T 6 t 6 ,<br />
T 5 t 5 t 6 t 6<br />
a CS = completely sterile, PS = partially sterile, F = fertile, MF = moderately fertile, HF = highly fertile.<br />
fertility as compared with the nil effect of t 5 t 5 t 6 t 6 t 7 t 7 ; therefore,<br />
the effects of genes t 5 , t 6 , t 7 , and T 7 on male fertility were<br />
all equal to zero. The effects of genotypes t 5 t 5 T 6 - and T 5 -t 6 t 6<br />
on pollen fertility were recorded <strong>in</strong> the range of 45.5–49.6%<br />
and 92.8–97.4%, respectively. Thus, the expression of T 5 on<br />
male fertility was 1.5 to 2.1 times larger <strong>in</strong> magnitude compared<br />
with that of the T 6 gene (Table 3).<br />
A similar analysis <strong>in</strong> the cross UPRI 95-140TGMS/RL<br />
253-3 for the F 2 and TC 1 generations revealed the effects of<br />
genes t 5 , t 6 , and t 7 on pollen fertility to be zero, whereas the<br />
effect of T 7 ranged from 59.4% to 68.5%. The cumulative effects<br />
of T 6 and T 5 were close to normal fertility s<strong>in</strong>ce the plants<br />
with the genotypes t 5 t 5 T 6 - and T 5 -t 6 t 6 were not dist<strong>in</strong>guishable<br />
from the normal fertility class (Table 3).<br />
References<br />
Borkakati RP, Virmani SS. 1996. <strong>Genetics</strong> of thermosensitive genic<br />
male sterility <strong>in</strong> rice. Euphytica 88:1-7.<br />
Li Rongbai, Pandey MP. 1998. <strong>Genetics</strong> of the thermosensitive genic<br />
male sterility trait <strong>in</strong> rice. Int. <strong>Rice</strong> Res. Notes 23(2):9-10.<br />
Li Rongbai, Pandey MP. 1999. <strong>Genetics</strong> and breed<strong>in</strong>g behaviour of<br />
thermosensitive genic male sterility <strong>in</strong> rice (Oryza sativa L.).<br />
J. Genet. Breed. 53:11-17.<br />
Maruyama K, Araki H, Kato H. 1991. Thermosensitive genic male<br />
sterility <strong>in</strong>duced by irradiation. In: <strong>Rice</strong> genetics II. Manila<br />
(Philipp<strong>in</strong>es): <strong>International</strong> <strong>Rice</strong> Research Institute. p 227-<br />
235.<br />
Pandey MP, Li Rongbai, S<strong>in</strong>gh JP, Mani SC, S<strong>in</strong>gh H, S<strong>in</strong>gh S. 1998.<br />
The identification and nature of a new thermosensitive genic<br />
male sterility source, UPRI 95-140 <strong>in</strong> rice. Cereal Res.<br />
Commun. 26(3):265-269.<br />
Yang RC, Liang K, Wang N, Chen S. 1992. A recessive gene <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>in</strong>dica rice 5406S for thermosensitive genic male sterility. <strong>Rice</strong><br />
Genet. Newsl. 9:56-57.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ addresses: R.B. Li, Guangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences,<br />
Nann<strong>in</strong>g 530007, Ch<strong>in</strong>a; M.P. Pandey, Department of<br />
<strong>Genetics</strong> and Plant Breed<strong>in</strong>g, G.B. Pant University of Agriculture<br />
and Technology, Pantnagar 263145, India.<br />
<strong>Genetics</strong> and breed<strong>in</strong>g of agronomic traits 23
Characteriz<strong>in</strong>g tropical japonicas with wide<br />
compatibility based on isozyme pattern <strong>in</strong> rice<br />
S.S. Malik, D.S. Brar, and G.S. Khush<br />
Dur<strong>in</strong>g the 1970s, an <strong>in</strong>dica-japonica hybridization program was launched <strong>in</strong> India, Indonesia, Malaysia, and<br />
some other Asian countries with the help of FAO to get high heterosis. However, only limited progress could be<br />
made because of the F 1<br />
sterility <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>dica-japonica crosses. Some varieties showed normal fertility <strong>in</strong> F 1<br />
<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>dicajaponica<br />
crosses, and these were designated as wide compatibility varieties (WCV). The sterility genes S 5 located<br />
between C + (chromogen for apiculus color) and Wx (waxy endosperm) loci with the S 5n allele for WCV, S 5i<br />
for <strong>in</strong>dica, and S 5j for japonica varieties were identified. Genotypes with S 5n /S 5i or S 5n /S 5j were fertile but genotypes<br />
with S 5i /S 5j were semisterile because of partial abortion of gametes carry<strong>in</strong>g S 5j alleles.<br />
To f<strong>in</strong>d wide compatibility varieties (WCV), 85 bulu varieties<br />
from Indonesia were crossed to <strong>in</strong>dica (IR36) and japonica<br />
(T65) testers. Pollen and spikelet fertility of the F 1 s and their<br />
parents were analyzed (Table 1). Pollen fertility of the parents<br />
varied from 71% to 93%, with a mean of 84.8%, but variability<br />
<strong>in</strong> the F 1 with the <strong>in</strong>dica (IR36) tester was 35–91% and 38–<br />
90% <strong>in</strong> the japonica (T65) tester, with a mean of 71.5% and<br />
62.5%, respectively. Spikelet fertility of the parents varied from<br />
65% to 97%, with a mean of 84.9%. In the F 1 s, it ranged from<br />
41% to 91% <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>dica (IR36) tester and from 59% to 96%<br />
<strong>in</strong> the japonica (T65) tester, with a mean of 63.4% and 83.0%,<br />
respectively.<br />
The variety with low pollen fertility did not necessarily<br />
have low spikelet fertility or vice versa. This meant that pollen<br />
semisterility does not seem to lower the spikelet fertility of F 1<br />
hybrids. These results agreed with those obta<strong>in</strong>ed by Ikehashi<br />
and Araki (1984) and Ikehashi and Wan (1998). The variety<br />
with more than 70% spikelet fertility <strong>in</strong> the F 1 with both testers<br />
was considered to be widely compatible. Of 85 bulu varieties,<br />
21 showed F 1 fertility (>70%) with both testers, which were<br />
considered to be WCV.<br />
Identify<strong>in</strong>g tropical japonicas <strong>in</strong> rice germplasm<br />
through isozyme analysis<br />
Glaszmann (1986), based on isozyme polymorphism of five<br />
loci (Pgi-1, Pgi-2, Amp-1, Amp-2, and Amp-3), classified 6,532<br />
traditional rice germplasm accessions from the Philipp<strong>in</strong>es<br />
(1,624) and Thailand (4,908) <strong>in</strong>to different groups. For the<br />
Philipp<strong>in</strong>e germplasm, four groups were identified: 595<br />
(36.6%) <strong>in</strong> group I (<strong>in</strong>dica), 3 (0.2%) <strong>in</strong> group V, 1,013<br />
(62.34%) <strong>in</strong> group VI (japonica), and 13 (0.80%) l<strong>in</strong>es were<br />
<strong>in</strong>termediate types (O). In the Thai rice germplasm, 4,058<br />
(82.7%) genotypes fell <strong>in</strong> group I (<strong>in</strong>dica), 2 (0.04%) <strong>in</strong> group<br />
V, 836 (17.03%) <strong>in</strong> group VI (japonica), and 12 (0.24%) were<br />
<strong>in</strong>termediate types. In the two countries, 1,013 and 836 l<strong>in</strong>es,<br />
respectively, were identified as tropical japonicas.<br />
Identify<strong>in</strong>g WC l<strong>in</strong>es based on the Amp-3 marker<br />
To identify the WC l<strong>in</strong>es based on the Amp-3 2 marker, the same<br />
data were used. Of 1,013 tropical japonica l<strong>in</strong>es from the Philipp<strong>in</strong>es<br />
and 836 from Thailand, 882 (87%) and 445 (53.22%),<br />
respectively, consisted of allele 2 of Amp-3. Hence, these 1,327<br />
l<strong>in</strong>es could be marked as widely compatible tropical japonicas<br />
and could be used <strong>in</strong> a new plant type hybrid rice breed<strong>in</strong>g<br />
program.<br />
Tagg<strong>in</strong>g the WC gene with isozyme markers<br />
All the bulu varieties were analyzed for Amp-3. All the WCV<br />
showed allele 2, whereas all the non-WCV showed allele 1 of<br />
Amp-3. The F 2 population of WCV Azucena and non-WCV<br />
IR36 consist<strong>in</strong>g of 250 plants was analyzed for isozyme loci<br />
of Amp-3, Est-2, Pgi-2, and Cat-1, which are located on chromosome<br />
6. Cosegregation analysis of WC and isozyme loci <strong>in</strong><br />
the F 2 showed the tight l<strong>in</strong>kage of WC with Amp-3 and Est-2<br />
(Tables 2 and 3).<br />
It appeared that allele 2 of Amp-3 was conserved under<br />
WCV of bulu rice of Indonesia, which may show some advantage<br />
of this system for ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g fertility <strong>in</strong> natural crosses<br />
<strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dica and japonica germplasm.<br />
References<br />
Glaszmann JC. 1986. A varietal classification of Asian cultivated<br />
rice (Oryza sativa L.) based on isozyme polymorphism. In:<br />
<strong>Rice</strong> genetics I. Manila (Philipp<strong>in</strong>es): <strong>International</strong> <strong>Rice</strong> Research<br />
Institute. p 83-90.<br />
Ikehashi H, Araki H. 1984. Varietal screen<strong>in</strong>g for compatibility types<br />
revealed <strong>in</strong> F 1 fertility of distant crosses <strong>in</strong> rice. Jpn. J. Breed.<br />
34:304-313.<br />
Ikehashi H, Wan J. 1998. The wide compatibility system: current<br />
knowledge of its genetics and use for enhanced yield heterosis.<br />
In: Virmani SS, Siddiq EA, Muralidharan K, editors.<br />
<strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> hybrid rice technology. Manila (Philipp<strong>in</strong>es):<br />
<strong>International</strong> <strong>Rice</strong> Research Institute. p 67-77.<br />
24 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
Table 1. Pollen and spikelet fertility of parents and their F 1 s with <strong>in</strong>dica (IR36) and<br />
japonica (T65) testers.<br />
Pollen fertility (%) Spikelet fertility (%)<br />
Variety a Parent F 1 with Allele of F 1 with<br />
Amp-3 Parent<br />
IR36 T65 IR36 T65<br />
tester tester tester tester<br />
Ase Balong Kamandi 87 68 38 1 69 55 86<br />
Abang Busur 73 82 78 1 93 49 92<br />
Ase Bandong 78 80 67 1 97 56 74<br />
Ase Lotang 81 80 73 1 96 61 81<br />
Ase Mandi 80 64 72 1 96 51 80<br />
Azucena 87 81 59 2 95 85 78<br />
Bali Ontjer 88 82 50 1 81 59 72<br />
Banda 84 70 45 2 82 70 83<br />
Beak Balok Loas 91 65 55 1 78 63 73<br />
Benong-130 93 88 85 1 95 61 85<br />
Beton berik 81 58 65 1 93 54 75<br />
Bomalsang 84 85 60 2 86 80 70<br />
Bonjo 73 76 74 1 95 50 80<br />
Bulu Gampolan 85 70 45 1 90 61 82<br />
Buyugaw Daykat 88 75 65 2 91 78 78<br />
Cicih Beronol 79 75 70 1 87 63 91<br />
Cicih Kapuk 85 71 55 1 89 60 68<br />
Dangge 86 71 79 1 91 52 92<br />
Dejawa Serut 83 75 70 1 93 66 76<br />
Dendek Rebiaq 74 64 70 1 81 56 85<br />
Djoro One 79 69 42 1 86 66 66<br />
Gendjah Gampol 87 35 52 2 79 85 78<br />
Gendjah Wangkal 85 68 72 2 82 87 90<br />
Genjah Rante 86 73 68 2 83 81 90<br />
Genjah Urang 80 65 75 1 88 41 95<br />
Goak 88 35 65 2 86 85 83<br />
Gropak 86 76 73 1 83 51 71<br />
Gundil Kun<strong>in</strong>g 92 73 42 1 80 62 79<br />
Hawarah Langgari 89 74 68 1 82 54 73<br />
Huma Pasir-1 84 75 76 2 86 91 86<br />
Jelean 84 72 75 1 94 49 90<br />
Jimbrug 80 85 65 2 85 79 76<br />
Jokodolok 88 73 63 1 89 43 93<br />
K. Rondo Marong 85 61 38 1 96 59 90<br />
Kamandi Pance 88 73 50 1 65 67 60<br />
Kaprit 78 68 40 1 73 62 74<br />
Karang Sarang-55 91 90 71 1 92 55 84<br />
Ketan Apel 84 68 66 1 67 53 92<br />
Ketan Aram 93 89 38 1 85 59 78<br />
Ketan Bandang 81 36 72 1 75 61 87<br />
Ketan Geude 77 60 68 1 93 56 70<br />
Ketan Gubat 91 62 61 1 67 59 92<br />
Ketan Lombok 93 83 32 1 66 63 67<br />
Ketan Lumbu 82 53 42 1 85 64 89<br />
Ketan Menah 90 39 40 1 75 54 94<br />
Ketan Montor 89 75 63 1 86 64 88<br />
Ketan Slawi 84 71 60 1 83 56 90<br />
Ketan Welut 83 71 57 1 87 62 95<br />
Kopo 83 88 52 1 90 67 92<br />
Leci Gogo 83 69 42 2 81 80 85<br />
Lembang 71 68 40 1 77 55 73<br />
Leri 87 65 72 1 81 68 94<br />
Loas Gendjah 88 63 48 2 77 74 83<br />
Manong Tj<strong>in</strong>de 77 66 62 1 94 56 91<br />
Mauni 80 65 64 1 76 57 90<br />
Menco Manurum 84 78 63 1 80 59 91<br />
cont<strong>in</strong>ued on next page<br />
<strong>Genetics</strong> and breed<strong>in</strong>g of agronomic traits 25
Cont<strong>in</strong>ued from page 25<br />
Pollen fertility (%) Spikelet fertility (%)<br />
Variety a Parent F 1 with Allele of F 1 with<br />
Amp-3 Parent<br />
IR36 T65 IR36 T65<br />
tester tester tester tester<br />
P.B.B. Harum 84 85 65 2 93 83 75<br />
Padi Bur<strong>in</strong>g Gogo 81 68 63 1 82 68 79<br />
Pae Umbala 83 55 66 2 85 70 90<br />
Paedai Nadimo 78 73 38 1 92 63 88<br />
Paedai Nodowatu-2 85 83 70 2 88 71 80<br />
Palangan 85 65 74 1 88 54 94<br />
Pare Bogor 88 61 66 2 73 70 77<br />
Pare M<strong>in</strong>ar 88 80 50 1 86 65 59<br />
Gendjah Urang 80 65 75 – 88 41 95<br />
Pasak Jalan 80 74 78 1 77 51 96<br />
Pr<strong>in</strong>g 81 84 53 2 92 83 77<br />
Pulut Cenarana 90 73 75 1 95 55 92<br />
Pulut Jawa 74 58 61 1 84 50 96<br />
Pulut Taddaga 86 73 73 1 97 53 87<br />
Pulut Tembahan 88 70 58 1 88 52 92<br />
Putus Tolo 76 77 70 1 88 54 95<br />
R.S. 91 65 54 2 95 84 78<br />
Ribon 92 76 88 1 62 59 81<br />
Rodjolele 80 80 62 1 87 68 83<br />
Sampang Atal 92 78 83 1 94 62 69<br />
Sarimahi 92 91 83 2 90 71 78<br />
Sengkeu 90 58 90 1 81 58 73<br />
Serendeh 91 82 69 1 81 68 71<br />
Sokoni 90 79 45 2 91 70 73<br />
Soponjono 89 86 70 1 84 58 80<br />
Sri Kun<strong>in</strong>g 91 82 62 1 75 60 83<br />
Tulak Bala 92 81 84 1 93 68 74<br />
Tundus 91 68 81 1 72 63 78<br />
Turpan-2 86 68 52 1 94 68 85<br />
Zaitun 86 91 78 2 82 78 78<br />
a Varieties <strong>in</strong> boldface are WCV with allele 2 of Amp-3.<br />
Table 2. Cosegregation of various isozyme loci on chromosome no. 6.<br />
Parents Amp3- Amp3- Amp3- Est2- Est2- Cat1-<br />
Est2 Cat1 Pgi2 Cat1 Pgi2 Pgi2<br />
IR36 11 22 11 11 11 22 22 11 22 22 11 22<br />
Azucena 22 11 22 22 22 11 11 22 11 11 22 11<br />
F 1 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12<br />
F 2 allelic comb<strong>in</strong>ation<br />
12 12 148 72 100 75 96 73<br />
22 11 57 13 26 14 3 18<br />
11 22 36 3 24 18 5 14<br />
12 22 1 40 16 39 16 22<br />
22 12 4 31 29 20 10 34<br />
12 11 3 40 37 39 40 27<br />
11 12 1 20 10 28 32 30<br />
22 22 0 17 5 3 24 10<br />
11 11 0 14 3 13 24 22<br />
26 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
Table 3. Allelic comb<strong>in</strong>ation of isozyme loci with WC<br />
gene.<br />
Allelic comb. Plants (no.) WC + WC –<br />
12 151 147 4<br />
22 62 61 1<br />
11 37 1 36<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ addresses: S.S. Malik, D.S. Brar, and G.S. Khush, <strong>International</strong><br />
<strong>Rice</strong> Research Institute, DAPO Box 7777, Metro Manila,<br />
Philipp<strong>in</strong>es; S.S. Malik, current address: Division of Plant<br />
Exploration, NBPGR, Pusa, New Delhi 110012, India.<br />
Effects of cytoplasm and cytoplasm-nucleus <strong>in</strong>teraction<br />
<strong>in</strong> breed<strong>in</strong>g japonica rice<br />
D. Tao, F. Hu, G. Yang, J. Yang, P. Xu, J. Li, C. Ye, and L. Dai<br />
Long-term breed<strong>in</strong>g practices <strong>in</strong>dicate that some sources of cytoplasm have become more important, but the<br />
reasons for this need to be expla<strong>in</strong>ed. Thus, five major cytoplasm sources <strong>in</strong> japonica—X<strong>in</strong>an 175, Reimei,<br />
Keq<strong>in</strong>g No. 3, Todorokiwase, and Toride No. 1—that constituted 75% of the cytoplasm of cultivars bred <strong>in</strong><br />
Yunnan, Ch<strong>in</strong>a, were used as female parents to hybridize with three dist<strong>in</strong>ct japonica rice varieties—8-126,<br />
Lijiangx<strong>in</strong>tuanheigu, and Nor<strong>in</strong>moti No. 20. Then, seven backcrosses us<strong>in</strong>g the male parent as the recurrent<br />
parent were made. Fifteen crosses of BC 7<br />
F 2<br />
and their parents were sown <strong>in</strong> J<strong>in</strong>ghong <strong>in</strong> the late 1999 season<br />
(July-October) for agronomic evaluation. Meanwhile, all materials were screened for low-temperature tolerance<br />
based on two methods <strong>in</strong> Kunm<strong>in</strong>g (1,916 m): natural field conditions and low-temperature water-cycl<strong>in</strong>g (19<br />
°C) irrigation at the boot<strong>in</strong>g stage. Spikelet fertility was used as an <strong>in</strong>dication of low-temperature tolerance.<br />
Under the fixed model, effects of cytoplasm on yield, width and angle of flag leaf, and low-temperature tolerance<br />
were significant or very significant. Effects of cytoplasm-nucleus <strong>in</strong>teraction on yield, spikelet number panicle –1 ,<br />
plant height, and low-temperature tolerance were significant. This <strong>in</strong>dicated that among materials studied,<br />
genetic differences existed <strong>in</strong> japonica rice yield, low-temperature tolerance, and important agronomic traits<br />
controlled by cytoplasm and/or cytoplasm-nucleus <strong>in</strong>teraction. The role of cytoplasm-nucleus <strong>in</strong>teraction was<br />
significant for yield, plant height, spikelet number panicle –1 , and spikelet fertility under natural conditions <strong>in</strong><br />
Kunm<strong>in</strong>g, and for spikelet fertility under low-temperature water-cycl<strong>in</strong>g irrigation. The contribution of cytoplasmnucleus<br />
<strong>in</strong>teraction to these traits was 5.7%, 9.1%, 1.4%, 1.1%, and 20.6%, respectively. These results <strong>in</strong>dicated<br />
that cytoplasm-nucleus <strong>in</strong>teraction plays an important role <strong>in</strong> yield, low-temperature tolerance, and important<br />
agronomic traits <strong>in</strong> japonica rice. In future rice breed<strong>in</strong>g, the role of cytoplasm and cytoplasm-nucleus<br />
<strong>in</strong>teraction should be given more attention.<br />
Genetic uniformity, or lack of genetic diversity, is of major<br />
concern <strong>in</strong> plant breed<strong>in</strong>g. Genetic uniformity is now considered<br />
to <strong>in</strong>crease the potential vulnerability of the crop to biotic<br />
and abiotic constra<strong>in</strong>ts (Chatel et al 1996).<br />
X<strong>in</strong>an 175, Reimei, Keq<strong>in</strong>g 3, Todorokiwase, and Toride<br />
No. 1 are core parents of japonica cultivars developed <strong>in</strong><br />
Yunnan (Yang 1992). N<strong>in</strong>ety percent of the cytoplasm of hybrid<br />
rice was from the wild abortive (WA) type (L<strong>in</strong> and M<strong>in</strong><br />
1991). The genetic base of the more traditional Brazilian upland<br />
IAC cultivars is made up of six landraces (Chatel et al<br />
1996). The major parents of IRAT upland rice cultivars are<br />
63-83, Moroberekan, and IAC 25 (Hu et al 1997).<br />
Asian cultivated rice has a narrow cytoplasm genetic<br />
base. The cytoplasm of Aizizhan, Nantehao, Shenglixian, and<br />
C<strong>in</strong>a accounts for 66% of the cytoplasmic sources for 529 <strong>in</strong>dica<br />
cultivars developed from 1950 to 1984 <strong>in</strong> southern Ch<strong>in</strong>a<br />
(Gu et al 1986). Most of the IR varieties also carry C<strong>in</strong>a cytoplasm.<br />
C<strong>in</strong>a is the ultimate maternal parent of 62% of the new<br />
(post-IR8) varieties <strong>in</strong> Bangladesh, 74% <strong>in</strong> Indonesia, 60% <strong>in</strong><br />
Korea, 75% <strong>in</strong> Sri Lanka, and 25% <strong>in</strong> Thailand. More than<br />
half of the rice land <strong>in</strong> the Philipp<strong>in</strong>es was planted to maternal<br />
derivatives of C<strong>in</strong>a (Hargrove et al 1979). Eight of 11 common<br />
irrigated varieties <strong>in</strong> Lat<strong>in</strong> America had C<strong>in</strong>a as the maternal<br />
source (CIAT 1991). The cytoplasmic similarity of modern<br />
varieties, while pos<strong>in</strong>g no immediate practical problem,<br />
does not help to break the yield plateau and susta<strong>in</strong> adaptation<br />
and resistance or tolerance. WA cytoplasm was solely <strong>in</strong>fected<br />
by blast isolate 90-2 (Liu et al 1992). Interaction between the<br />
nucleus and cytoplasm affected the expression of bacterial<br />
blight (Yang 1987). Low-temperature tolerance was reported<br />
to be cytoplasmic-<strong>in</strong>herited (Ratho and Pradhan 1992). It is<br />
necessary to study the effects of cytoplasm, nucleus, and <strong>in</strong>teraction<br />
between the nucleus and cytoplasm of core parents used<br />
<strong>in</strong> breed<strong>in</strong>g. To isolate a purely cytoplasmic effect, a long series<br />
of backcrosses to recurrent parents is necessary to develop<br />
nucleus substitution l<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong> an alien cytoplasm.<br />
<strong>Genetics</strong> and breed<strong>in</strong>g of agronomic traits 27
Table 1. Variance analysis of yield and agronomic traits (F value).<br />
Model Source Yield a Panicle 1,000-gra<strong>in</strong> Panicle Panicles Spikelets Filled-gra<strong>in</strong>s Spikelet<br />
of variation exsertion weight length plant –1 panicle –1 panicle –1 fertility<br />
Random Cytoplasm 1.226 0.789 2.050 0.833 0.381 0.538 0.990 0.692<br />
Nucleus 28.068 ** 82.634 ** 74.784 ** 347.541 ** 37.753 ** 150.798 ** 160.083 ** 49.695 **<br />
Interaction 3.971 ** 1.469 0.808 0.448 1.831 2.164 1.768 1.264<br />
Fixed Cytoplasm 4.867 ** 1.158 1.656 0.374 0.698 1.274 1.751 0.875<br />
Nucleus 111.467 ** 121.368 ** 60.411 ** 155.795 ** 69.127 ** 326.376 ** 283.030 ** 62.820 **<br />
Interaction 3.971 ** 1.469 0.808 0.448 1.831 2.164 1.768 1.264<br />
a ** = significant at the 1% level.<br />
Materials and methods<br />
Five major cytoplasm sources <strong>in</strong> japonica rice—X<strong>in</strong>an 175,<br />
Reimei, Keq<strong>in</strong>g No. 3, Todorokiwase, and Toride No.1—were<br />
used as female parents <strong>in</strong> crosses with three japonica varieties—8-126,<br />
Lijiangx<strong>in</strong>tuanheigu, and Nor<strong>in</strong>moti No. 20. Seven<br />
backcrosses were made us<strong>in</strong>g the recurrent parent as the male<br />
parent. Fifteen comb<strong>in</strong>ations <strong>in</strong> the BC 7 F 2 and their parents<br />
were sown on 5 July and transplanted on 17 July 1999 <strong>in</strong> the<br />
J<strong>in</strong>ghong late season (July-October) for agronomic evaluation,<br />
<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g yield plot –1 (kg), panicle exsertion (cm), 1,000-gra<strong>in</strong><br />
weight (g), panicle length (cm), panicle number plant –1 , spikelet<br />
number panicle –1 , filled-gra<strong>in</strong> number panicle –1 , spikelet<br />
fertility (%), plant height (cm), head<strong>in</strong>g (d), length (cm), width<br />
(cm), and angle of flag leaf, and length and width of the second<br />
and third leaf below the flag leaf. The plot size was 1.75 ×<br />
1.6 m 2 , with a spac<strong>in</strong>g of 16 × 25 cm, and with four replications.<br />
All materials were screened for low-temperature tolerance<br />
<strong>in</strong> Kunm<strong>in</strong>g (1,916 m) based on two methods: natural<br />
evaluation and low-temperature (19 °C) water-cycl<strong>in</strong>g irrigation<br />
at the boot<strong>in</strong>g stage (Dai et al 1999). Spikelet fertility was<br />
used as an <strong>in</strong>dication of low-temperature tolerance. Except for<br />
yield plot –1 and head<strong>in</strong>g time, all data were taken from observations<br />
from 10 <strong>in</strong>dividuals plot –1 . Plot averages were used to<br />
make variance analysis. Fixed and random model variance<br />
analyses were used to detect the difference and contribution of<br />
the nucleus, cytoplasm, and <strong>in</strong>teraction between the cytoplasm<br />
and nucleus, respectively. When calculated, the contribution<br />
of phenotypic variance = nucleus variance + cytoplasm variance<br />
+ <strong>in</strong>teraction variance between nucleus and cytoplasm +<br />
environment variance. The contribution of <strong>in</strong>teraction between<br />
cytoplasm and nucleus = <strong>in</strong>teraction variance between nucleus<br />
and cytoplasm/phenotype × 100%.<br />
Results and discussion<br />
Difference of cytoplasm and <strong>in</strong>teraction between<br />
cytoplasm and nucleus<br />
Under the fixed model, effects of cytoplasm on yield, width<br />
and angle of flag leaf, and low-temperature tolerance were significant.<br />
The effects of cytoplasm-nucleus <strong>in</strong>teraction on yield,<br />
plant height, and low-temperature tolerance were significant.<br />
This <strong>in</strong>dicated that among materials studied, genetic differences<br />
existed <strong>in</strong> japonica rice yield, low-temperature tolerance,<br />
Table 2. Yield difference among different cytoplasm sources.<br />
Cytoplasm Yield (kg plot –1 ) 5% significance 1% significance<br />
X<strong>in</strong>an 175 0.58 A A<br />
Todorokiwase 0.55 A AB<br />
Reimei 0.46 B B<br />
Keq<strong>in</strong>g No. 3 0.46 B B<br />
Toride No. 1 0.45 B B<br />
Table 3. Variance analysis of low-temperature tolerance.<br />
Model Source of Kunm<strong>in</strong>g natural Low-temperature<br />
variation evaluation a water-cycl<strong>in</strong>g irrigation<br />
Random Cytoplasm 1.560 1.000<br />
Nucleus 208.809 ** 17.906 **<br />
Interaction 4.494 ** 28.826 **<br />
Fixed Cytoplasm 7.009 ** 28.826 **<br />
Nucleus 938.460 ** 516.162 **<br />
Interaction 4.494 ** 28.826 **<br />
a ** = significant at the 1% level.<br />
and some important agronomic traits controlled by the cytoplasm<br />
and/or cytoplasm-nucleus <strong>in</strong>teraction (Table 1).<br />
X<strong>in</strong>an 175 is the most popular donor of japonica cultivars<br />
<strong>in</strong> Yunnan, Ch<strong>in</strong>a. The effect of the cytoplasm of X<strong>in</strong>an<br />
175 on yield was different from that of Reimei, Keq<strong>in</strong>g No. 3,<br />
and Toride No. 1 (Table 2). There was no significant difference<br />
between X<strong>in</strong>an 175 and Todorokiwase.<br />
Genotypes with different cytoplasm had different yield<br />
(data not shown). The effect of the <strong>in</strong>teraction between nucleus<br />
and cytoplasm on yield was evident. Significant differences<br />
existed <strong>in</strong> angle and width of the flag leaf among the various<br />
sources of cytoplasm. The <strong>in</strong>teraction between the nucleus and<br />
cytoplasm had a significant effect on plant height.<br />
In J<strong>in</strong>ghong, there was no damage because of low temperature,<br />
and the effects of cytoplasm and the <strong>in</strong>teraction between<br />
the nucleus and cytoplasm on spikelet fertility were not<br />
significant (Table 1). But, <strong>in</strong> Kunm<strong>in</strong>g, under the two methods<br />
of evaluat<strong>in</strong>g low-temperature tolerance, the effects of cytoplasm<br />
and the <strong>in</strong>teraction between the nucleus and cytoplasm<br />
on low-temperature tolerance were very significant (Table 3).<br />
Toride No. 1 is a Japanese cultivar with blast resistance,<br />
where<strong>in</strong> the effect of cytoplasm on low-temperature tolerance<br />
28 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
Table 4. Spikelet fertility difference under Kunm<strong>in</strong>g conditions and<br />
low-temperature water cycl<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
Spikelet fertility (%) Spikelet fertility (%)<br />
Cytoplasm under natural conditions a under low-temperature<br />
s<strong>in</strong> –1 √p water cycl<strong>in</strong>g<br />
s<strong>in</strong> –1 √p<br />
Toride No. 1 51.4 a 17.1 a<br />
X<strong>in</strong>an 175 44.0 b 5.2 c<br />
Todorokiwase 43.3 b 15.8 a<br />
Reimei 42.1 b 11.1 b<br />
Keq<strong>in</strong>g No. 3 40.7 b 6.2 c<br />
a Numbers followed by a common letter are statistically nonsignificant.<br />
was significantly different from that <strong>in</strong> others but not <strong>in</strong><br />
Todorokiwase under Kunm<strong>in</strong>g conditions (Table 4). Low-temperature<br />
water-cycl<strong>in</strong>g irrigation is a more appropriate method<br />
for evaluat<strong>in</strong>g spikelet fertility, which showed that the cytoplasm<br />
of Toride No. 1 differed significantly from that of Reimei,<br />
Keq<strong>in</strong>g No. 3, and X<strong>in</strong>an 175. Meanwhile, the effect of the<br />
<strong>in</strong>teraction between the cytoplasm and nucleus on low-temperature<br />
tolerance was detected, but it was not so common<br />
(Table 5).<br />
Interaction between nucleus and cytoplasm<br />
The role of cytoplasm-nucleus <strong>in</strong>teraction was significant for<br />
yield, plant height, and spikelet fertility under both natural<br />
conditions and low-temperature water-cycl<strong>in</strong>g irrigation. The<br />
contribution of cytoplasm-nucleus <strong>in</strong>teraction under low-temperature<br />
water-cycl<strong>in</strong>g irrigation was greater than that of natural<br />
low-temperature evaluation because of high sterility under<br />
low-temperature cycl<strong>in</strong>g irrigation. These results <strong>in</strong>dicated that<br />
cytoplasm-nucleus <strong>in</strong>teraction plays an important role <strong>in</strong> yield,<br />
plant height, and low-temperature tolerance.<br />
In future rice breed<strong>in</strong>g and genetic germplasm resources,<br />
the role of cytoplasm should be given attention (Pham 1991).<br />
In breed<strong>in</strong>g for high yield and low-temperature tolerance, if<br />
one important source of cytoplasm for high yield or low-temperature<br />
tolerance could be found, and used as the female parent,<br />
fixed or stable genetic progress would be atta<strong>in</strong>ed.<br />
The <strong>in</strong>teraction between the cytoplasm and nucleus might<br />
be another way to use and fix hybrid vigor <strong>in</strong> rice, because<br />
even under the random model, the contributions of cytoplasmnucleus<br />
<strong>in</strong>teraction to yield, plant height, and low temperature<br />
were not high.<br />
References<br />
Chatel M, Guimarães E, Osp<strong>in</strong>a Y, Borrero J. 1996. Improvement of<br />
upland rice us<strong>in</strong>g gene pools and populations with recessive<br />
male-sterility gene. In: Pigg<strong>in</strong> C, Courtois B, Schmit V, editors.<br />
Upland rice research <strong>in</strong> partnership. <strong>IRRI</strong> Discussion<br />
Paper Series No. 16. Manila (Philipp<strong>in</strong>es): <strong>International</strong> <strong>Rice</strong><br />
Research Institute. p 284-298.<br />
CIAT (Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical). 1991. <strong>Rice</strong><br />
program 1986-1989 report. Work<strong>in</strong>g Document No. 92. Cali,<br />
Colombia. 404 p.<br />
Table 5. Interaction difference between nucleus and cytoplasm under<br />
Kunm<strong>in</strong>g natural conditions and low-temperature water cycl<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
Spikelet fertility (%) Spikelet fertility (%)<br />
Interaction between under natural under lowcytoplasm<br />
and nucleus conditions a temperature<br />
s<strong>in</strong> –1 √p water cycl<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Toride No. 1/ Lijiangx<strong>in</strong>tuanheigu 67.4 a 51.4 a<br />
Reimei/Lijiangx<strong>in</strong>tuanheigu 67.1 a 33.4 b<br />
Todorokiwase/ Lijiangx<strong>in</strong>tuanheigu 66.3 a 47.3 a<br />
X<strong>in</strong>an 175/ Lijiangx<strong>in</strong>tuanheigu 65.4 a 0.0 c<br />
Keq<strong>in</strong>g No. 3/ Lijiangx<strong>in</strong>tuanheigu 62.4 a 18.5 c<br />
Toride No. 1/8-126 35.3 b 0.0 d<br />
X<strong>in</strong>an 175/8-126 22.5 c 15.6 c<br />
Todorokiwase/8-126 20.2 c 0.0 d<br />
Keq<strong>in</strong>g No. 3/8-126 19.1 c 0.0 d<br />
Reimei/8-126 17.1 c 0.0 d<br />
a Numbers followed by a common letter are statistically nonsignificant.<br />
Dai L, Ye C, Xu F, Zeng Y, Liang B, Wen G. 1999. Genetic analysis<br />
on cold tolerance characteristics of Yunnan rice landrace<br />
(Oryza sativa L.) Kunm<strong>in</strong>gxiaobaigu. Ch<strong>in</strong>ese J. <strong>Rice</strong> Sci.<br />
13(2):73-76.<br />
Gu MH, Pan XB, Li X. 1986. Genetic analysis of the pedigrees of<br />
the improved cultivars <strong>in</strong> Oryza sativa L. subsp. Hsien <strong>in</strong> South<br />
Ch<strong>in</strong>a. Sci. Agric. S<strong>in</strong>. 1:41-48.<br />
Hargrove TR, Coffman WR, Cabanilla VL. 1979. Genetic <strong>in</strong>terrelationships<br />
of improved rice varieties <strong>in</strong> Asia. <strong>IRRI</strong> Research<br />
Paper Series 23. Manila (Philipp<strong>in</strong>es): <strong>International</strong> <strong>Rice</strong><br />
Research Institute. 34 p.<br />
Hu F, Tao D, Yang G, Yang J. 1997. Genealogical analysis of IRAT<br />
upland rice varieties. In: Poisson C, Rakotoarisoa J, editors.<br />
<strong>Rice</strong> cultivation <strong>in</strong> highland areas. Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs of the CIRAD<br />
conference held on 29 March-5 April 1996 at Antananarivo,<br />
Madagascar. p 181-184.<br />
L<strong>in</strong> SC, M<strong>in</strong> SK, editors. 1991. <strong>Rice</strong> varieties and their genealogy<br />
<strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a. Shangshai Science and Technology Press. p 8.<br />
Liu KM, Wang LS, Wei JK, Zhu XY, Wu QA. 1992. Reaction of<br />
rice male sterile cytoplasm of wild abortion type to the <strong>in</strong>fection<br />
of Pyricularia oryzae. Sci. Agric. S<strong>in</strong>. 25(2):92.<br />
Pham JL.1991. Genetic diversity and <strong>in</strong>tervarietal relationships <strong>in</strong><br />
rice (Oryza sativa L.) <strong>in</strong> Africa. <strong>Rice</strong> genetics II. Manila (Philipp<strong>in</strong>es):<br />
<strong>International</strong> <strong>Rice</strong> Research Institute. p 55-65.<br />
Ratho SN, Pradhan SB. 1992. Cytoplasmically controlled cold tolerance<br />
<strong>in</strong> a cytoplasmic-genetic male sterile l<strong>in</strong>e of rice.<br />
Euphytica 58:241-244.<br />
Yang RC. 1987. Susceptibility of A l<strong>in</strong>es and B l<strong>in</strong>es to bacterial<br />
blight (BB). Int. <strong>Rice</strong> Res. Newsl. 12(6):7.<br />
Yang SX. 1992. <strong>Rice</strong> <strong>in</strong> Yunnan. In: Xiong ZM, Cai HF, M<strong>in</strong> SK, Li<br />
BC, editors. 1992. <strong>Rice</strong> <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a. Beij<strong>in</strong>g (Ch<strong>in</strong>a): Ch<strong>in</strong>a<br />
Agricultural Science and Technology Press. p 421-436.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ addresses: D. Tao, F. Hu, G. Yang, J. Yang, P. Xu, and J.<br />
Li, Food Crops Research Institute; C. Ye and L. Dai, Crop<br />
Genetic Germplasm Resources Institute, Yunnan Academy of<br />
Agricultural Sciences, Kunm<strong>in</strong>g 650205, Ch<strong>in</strong>a.<br />
Acknowledgment: This research was partly funded by the Foundation<br />
of Ch<strong>in</strong>a <strong>Rice</strong> Science Development and Yunnan Natural<br />
Science Foundation.<br />
<strong>Genetics</strong> and breed<strong>in</strong>g of agronomic traits 29
Genetic analysis of hybrid breakdown <strong>in</strong> a japonica/<strong>in</strong>dica<br />
cross of rice<br />
T. Kubo and A. Yoshimura<br />
Two genes caus<strong>in</strong>g hybrid breakdown were identified. Hybrid breakdown, F 2<br />
sterility, and F 2<br />
weakness were<br />
observed <strong>in</strong> the backcross progeny of a cross between japonica and <strong>in</strong>dica varieties. A set of two genes, hsa1<br />
and hsa2, was responsible for F 2<br />
sterility. The donor parent, IR24, has the recessive sterile alleles hsa1 and the<br />
normal alleles hsa2 + . In contrast, the recurrent parent, Asom<strong>in</strong>ori, has the dom<strong>in</strong>ant normal alleles hsa1 + and<br />
the sterile alleles hsa2. The hybrid progeny with hsa1hsa1hsa2hsa2 genotype showed high spikelet sterility.<br />
L<strong>in</strong>kage analysis showed that hsa1 and hsa2 were l<strong>in</strong>ked to restriction fragment length polymorphism markers<br />
G148 on chromosome 12 and G104 on chromosome 8, respectively. Similarly, the F 2<br />
weakness was due to a set<br />
of two genes designated as hwe1 and hwe2, which were tightly l<strong>in</strong>ked to C443 on chromosome 12 and C955 on<br />
chromosome 1, respectively. The genotype of the double recessive homozygous hwe1hwe1hwe2hwe2 caused<br />
hybrid weakness. IR24 has the recessive alleles of hwe1, whereas Asom<strong>in</strong>ori has the recessive alleles of hwe2.<br />
The f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs provide a clear evidence of the complementary gene system underly<strong>in</strong>g hybrid breakdown <strong>in</strong> rice.<br />
Reproductive barriers often arise <strong>in</strong> varietal crosses of cultivated<br />
rice. Several k<strong>in</strong>ds of reproductive barriers <strong>in</strong> F 1 hybrids<br />
such as F 1 sterility (Oka 1974) and F 1 weakness (Oka 1957)<br />
have been observed. The genetic basis of these F 1 abnormalities<br />
has been well analyzed. However, little is known regard<strong>in</strong>g<br />
the genetic basis of hybrid breakdown <strong>in</strong> F 2 or later generations<br />
because of the complex mode of its <strong>in</strong>heritance.<br />
A series of <strong>in</strong>dica chromosome substitution l<strong>in</strong>es with a<br />
japonica genetic background through repeated backcross<strong>in</strong>g<br />
and marker-assisted selection was developed <strong>in</strong> our previous<br />
study (Kubo et al 1999). In the backcrossed progenies, hybrid<br />
breakdown, F 2 sterility, and F 2 weakness were found. We identified<br />
sets of two complementary genes responsible for F 2 sterility<br />
and F 2 weakness and located these genes on the restriction<br />
fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) l<strong>in</strong>kage map.<br />
Materials and methods<br />
To develop chromosome segment substitution l<strong>in</strong>es, recomb<strong>in</strong>ant<br />
<strong>in</strong>bred l<strong>in</strong>es derived from a cross between Asom<strong>in</strong>ori<br />
(japonica) and IR24 (<strong>in</strong>dica) (Tsunematsu et al 1996) were<br />
backcrossed with Asom<strong>in</strong>ori (Kubo et al 1999). The BC 3 F 2<br />
and BC 3 F 3 populations were used for genetic analysis of hybrid<br />
breakdown. RFLP genotypes of BC 3 F 1 observed <strong>in</strong> the<br />
previous study were used as reference data. L<strong>in</strong>kage analyses<br />
were carried out us<strong>in</strong>g the BC 3 F 3 populations. The BC 1 F 3 population<br />
derived from the crosses Asom<strong>in</strong>ori/IR24//Asom<strong>in</strong>ori<br />
was also used for l<strong>in</strong>kage analysis. RFLP analysis was performed<br />
by us<strong>in</strong>g the DNA clones on the framework map of<br />
Harushima et al (1998).<br />
Results and discussion<br />
F 2<br />
sterility<br />
We conducted backcross<strong>in</strong>g to produce chromosome segment<br />
substitution l<strong>in</strong>es of <strong>in</strong>dica rice with japonica background<br />
(Kubo et al 1999). We observed monogenic or digenic segregation<br />
of hybrid sterility <strong>in</strong> BC 3 F 2 . All BC 3 F 1 plants produc<strong>in</strong>g<br />
the sterile segregants commonly possessed an IR24 segment<br />
<strong>in</strong> a region around RFLP marker G148 on chromosome<br />
12, suggest<strong>in</strong>g the existence of a causal gene at the region of<br />
chromosome 12. Detailed genetic analysis for the hybrid sterility<br />
was done us<strong>in</strong>g BC 3 F 3 populations. The selfed progeny<br />
of a fertile BC 3 F 2 plant, 131-22 (see graphical genotype of<br />
BC 3 F 1 131, Fig. 1A), segregated <strong>in</strong>to two fertility classes, fertile<br />
(60–100%) and sterile (5–40%) with a total of 70 and 31<br />
plants, respectively (Fig. 1B). The segregation ratio fitted to<br />
3:1 (χ 2 = 1.75). The sterile plants carried IR24 homozygous<br />
alleles, whereas the fertile plants carried heterozygous or<br />
Asom<strong>in</strong>ori homozygous alleles at G148 on chromosome 12.<br />
These results <strong>in</strong>dicated that the hybrid sterility was specifically<br />
F 2 sterility and attributed to a s<strong>in</strong>gle recessive gene near<br />
G148. The gene was designated as hsa1 and mapped on chromosome<br />
12 (Fig. 2). Indica donor parent IR24 carries the recessive<br />
hsa1 allele and the recurrent parent Asom<strong>in</strong>ori carries<br />
the dom<strong>in</strong>ant hsa1 + allele.<br />
The BC 3 F 2 plant 15-7 showed partial sterility, even<br />
though it was homozygous for the hsa1 alleles (Fig. 1C). The<br />
self progeny of BC 3 F 2 15-7 exhibited three discrete phenotypic<br />
classes: fertile (85–100%), semi-sterile (45–70%), and<br />
sterile (10–20%) with a total of 54, 39, and 5 plants, respectively<br />
(Fig. 1D). Each phenotype of fertile, semi-sterile, and<br />
sterile corresponded to IR24 homozygous and heterozygous<br />
alleles and Asom<strong>in</strong>ori homozygous alleles, respectively, at<br />
G104 on chromosome 8. These results demonstrated that<br />
Asom<strong>in</strong>ori alleles at the sterility locus l<strong>in</strong>ked to G104 were<br />
complementary to hsa1 recessive alleles from IR24. This gene<br />
for F 2 sterility was designated as hsa2 and located between<br />
G104 and C347 on chromosome 8 (Fig. 2). It was clear that<br />
the hsa1hsa1hsa2hsa2 genotype caused high sterility, as the<br />
parental genotypes were shown by hsa1 + hsa1 + hsa2hsa2 for<br />
Asom<strong>in</strong>ori and hsa1hsa1hsa2 + hsa2 + for IR24.<br />
The pollen gra<strong>in</strong>s from the sterile plants sta<strong>in</strong>ed well with<br />
acetocarm<strong>in</strong>e, <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g that they were normal. In addition,<br />
30 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
A<br />
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12<br />
C<br />
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12<br />
hsa2<br />
hsa2<br />
hsa2 +<br />
G104<br />
hsa2<br />
G148<br />
hsa1 hsa1 +<br />
hsa1<br />
hsa1<br />
Asom<strong>in</strong>ori chromosome<br />
IR24 chromosome<br />
BC 3<br />
F 1<br />
131<br />
Self<br />
BC 3<br />
F 2<br />
131-22<br />
Self<br />
B<br />
Number of plants<br />
25<br />
D<br />
30<br />
25<br />
N = 98<br />
BC 3<br />
F 2<br />
15-7<br />
Self<br />
N = 101<br />
20<br />
20<br />
15<br />
15<br />
10<br />
5<br />
0<br />
0 20 40 60 80 100<br />
10<br />
5<br />
Spikelet fertility (%)<br />
0<br />
0 20 40 60 80 100<br />
Fig. 1. Graphical F 2 genotypes<br />
derived from BC 3 F 1 131 (A) and<br />
F 3 derived from BC 3 F 2 15-7 (C)<br />
and frequency distribution of<br />
spikelet fertility <strong>in</strong> their progenies<br />
(B, D). = homozygous for<br />
Asom<strong>in</strong>ori, = heterozygous,<br />
= homozygous for IR24, at<br />
RFLP markers G148 (B) and G104<br />
(D).<br />
normal seed sett<strong>in</strong>g was observed when pollen sterile plants<br />
were used to poll<strong>in</strong>ate Asom<strong>in</strong>ori, whereas seed sett<strong>in</strong>g was<br />
low when sterile plants were poll<strong>in</strong>ated by Asom<strong>in</strong>ori. Therefore,<br />
this F 2 sterility seemed to be female sterility.<br />
In BC 3 F 3 15-7, hsa2 heterozygous plants<br />
(hsa1hsa1hsa2 + hsa2) showed semi-sterility. Furthermore, hsa2<br />
allele was transmitted at low frequency (hsa2 + :hsa2 = 147:49).<br />
It was possible that the hsa2 gene acted gametophytically,<br />
br<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g about abortion of gametes carry<strong>in</strong>g the hsa2 allele <strong>in</strong><br />
heterozygous plants.<br />
Oka and Doida (1962) and Yokoo (1984) reported similar<br />
F 2 sterility. In their studies, F 2 sterility was assumed to be<br />
due to a complementary gene from both parents. Our results<br />
supported the complementary gene system based on DNA<br />
marker analysis.<br />
F 2<br />
weakness<br />
F 2 weakness was also found <strong>in</strong> the BC 3 F 2 progeny. Weak plants<br />
were characterized by a small number of tillers, short culm<br />
and panicle, pale green leaf, and complete sterility. The frequency<br />
of weak plants <strong>in</strong> each segregat<strong>in</strong>g population was lower<br />
(2.7–17.4%) than the normal frequency of 25%, except <strong>in</strong> one<br />
population. Similarly, we attempted to map the causal genes<br />
for F 2 weakness on an RFLP l<strong>in</strong>kage map. We found that F 2<br />
weakness was due to a set of two <strong>in</strong>dependent genes, hwe1<br />
and hwe2. The hwe1 was derived from IR24 and closely l<strong>in</strong>ked<br />
to C443 on chromosome 12 (Fig. 2). Another recessive gene,<br />
hwe2, was derived from Asom<strong>in</strong>ori and closely l<strong>in</strong>ked to C955<br />
on chromosome 1 (Fig. 2). The recomb<strong>in</strong>ant plants carry<strong>in</strong>g<br />
the double recessive genotype, hwe1hwe1hwe2hwe2, caused<br />
hybrid weakness. The double recessive gene for F 2 weakness<br />
(giv<strong>in</strong>g a ratio of 15 normal:1 weak <strong>in</strong> F 2 ) was newly identified<br />
<strong>in</strong> this study, though a complementary recessive gene (11<br />
normal:5 weak <strong>in</strong> F 2 ) has already been reported (Oka 1957,<br />
Fukuoka et al 1998).<br />
The results show two loci responsible for hybrid breakdown<br />
<strong>in</strong> japonica-<strong>in</strong>dica hybrid progenies.<br />
References<br />
Fukuoka S, Namai H, Okuno K. 1998. RFLP mapp<strong>in</strong>g of the genes<br />
controll<strong>in</strong>g hybrid breakdown <strong>in</strong> rice (Oryza sativa L.). Theor.<br />
Appl. Genet. 97:446-449.<br />
<strong>Genetics</strong> and breed<strong>in</strong>g of agronomic traits 31
1 8 12<br />
R3192<br />
R1869<br />
18.0<br />
hwe2<br />
CEN<br />
2.1<br />
2.6<br />
G104<br />
hsa2<br />
C347<br />
CEN<br />
2.3<br />
2.4<br />
hwe1<br />
C443<br />
S1436<br />
CEN<br />
C955<br />
7.5<br />
R1709<br />
11.2<br />
R727<br />
6.4<br />
C1211<br />
3.5<br />
hsa1<br />
G148<br />
C1069<br />
Fig. 2. L<strong>in</strong>kage map show<strong>in</strong>g the location of hybrid breakdown genes <strong>in</strong> the cross of Asom<strong>in</strong>ori and<br />
IR24. RFLP framework maps of chromosomes 1, 8, and 12 (left) are quoted from Harushima et al<br />
(1998). The chromosomes are oriented with the short arm on top. L<strong>in</strong>kage maps of hsa1 and hsa2<br />
responsible for F 2 sterility and of hwe1 and hwe2 responsible for F 2 weakness are shown on the<br />
right. Map distances are given <strong>in</strong> centiMorgan (cM). CEN = centromere.<br />
Harushima Y, Yano M, Shomura A, Sato M, Shimano T, Kuboki Y,<br />
Yamamoto T, L<strong>in</strong> SY, Antonio BA, Parco A, Kajiya H, Huang<br />
N, Yamamoto K, Nagamura Y, Kurata N, Khush GS, Sasaki<br />
T. 1998. A high-density rice genetic l<strong>in</strong>kage map with 2275<br />
markers us<strong>in</strong>g a s<strong>in</strong>gle F 2 population. <strong>Genetics</strong> 148:479-494.<br />
Kubo T, Nakamura K, Yoshimura A. 1999. Development of a series<br />
of <strong>in</strong>dica chromosome segment substitution l<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong> japonica<br />
background of rice. <strong>Rice</strong> Genet. Newsl. 16:104-106.<br />
Oka HI. 1957. Phylogenetic differentiation of cultivated rice. XV.<br />
Complementary lethal genes <strong>in</strong> rice. Jpn. J. Genet. 32:83-87.<br />
Oka HI. 1974. Analysis of genes controll<strong>in</strong>g F 1 sterility <strong>in</strong> rice by<br />
the use of isogenic l<strong>in</strong>es. <strong>Genetics</strong> 77:521-534.<br />
Oka HI, Doida Y. 1962. Phylogenetic differentiation of cultivated<br />
rice. XX. Analysis of the genetic basis of hybrid breakdown<br />
<strong>in</strong> rice. Jpn. J. Genet. 37:24-35.<br />
Tsunematsu H, Yoshimura A, Harushima Y, Nagamura Y, Kurata N,<br />
Yano M, Sasaki T, Iwata N. 1996. RFLP framework map us<strong>in</strong>g<br />
recomb<strong>in</strong>ant <strong>in</strong>bred l<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong> rice. Breed. Sci. 46:279-284.<br />
Yokoo M. 1984. Female sterility <strong>in</strong> an <strong>in</strong>dica-japonica cross of rice.<br />
Jpn. J. Breed. 34:219-227.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ address: Plant Breed<strong>in</strong>g Laboratory, Faculty of Agriculture,<br />
Kyushu University, Fukuoka 812-8581, Japan.<br />
Acknowledgment: This study was supported <strong>in</strong> part by the Biooriented<br />
Technology Research Advancement Institution<br />
(BRAIN), Japan.<br />
32 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
Induction and use of japonica rice mutant R917<br />
with broad-spectrum resistance to blast<br />
M<strong>in</strong>gxian Zhang, Jianlong Xu, Rongt<strong>in</strong>g Luo, De Shi, and Zhikang Li<br />
R917, a japonica rice mutant with broad-spectrum resistance to blast, was isolated from an irradiated population.<br />
It was resistant to 136 of 138 isolates collected from different regions <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a. The mutant showed a s<strong>in</strong>gle<br />
dom<strong>in</strong>ant gene for resistance to races ZB13, ZC15, and ZE3, and was nonallelic to genes present <strong>in</strong> Chengte<br />
232 and Xiushui 37. After <strong>in</strong>oculation with seven Japanese differential stra<strong>in</strong>s, R917 showed the same reaction<br />
pattern as Toride 1 and differed from the other differential varieties. An allelism test <strong>in</strong>dicated that the resistance<br />
genes between R917 and Toride 1 were nonallelic to Ch<strong>in</strong>ese races ZC15 and ZE3. R917 was a semidwarf with<br />
strong stem, narrow and erect leaf, and monogenic broad-spectrum resistance to blast. Several l<strong>in</strong>es newly bred<br />
us<strong>in</strong>g R917 as a donor of blast resistance had the same broad-spectrum resistance to blast as R917 and<br />
desirable agronomic traits, <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g no l<strong>in</strong>kage drag between the resistance gene and other important agronomic<br />
traits. Recently, R917 has been used as a donor <strong>in</strong> many rice breed<strong>in</strong>g programs <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a.<br />
The exploitation of resistance genes with a broad spectrum,<br />
accumulation of multiple genes or polygenes, and a comb<strong>in</strong>ation<br />
of major genes is considered an effective method aga<strong>in</strong>st<br />
blast damage. Induced mutation is considered an important<br />
supplement to natural genetic variability. Many k<strong>in</strong>ds of mutations,<br />
<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g semidwarfism, resistance to diseases and <strong>in</strong>sects,<br />
and early maturity, have been <strong>in</strong>duced by radiation. Many<br />
laboratories <strong>in</strong> different rice-grow<strong>in</strong>g countries have tried to<br />
<strong>in</strong>duce blast resistance by radiation. In general, irradiated materials<br />
had higher resistance than the orig<strong>in</strong>al (Yamasaki and<br />
Kawai 1968, Marie and T<strong>in</strong>arelli 1972), but there are few reports<br />
on a high level and broad spectrum of blast resistance<br />
<strong>in</strong>duced by radiation. In 1993, we began to select blast resistance<br />
mutant R917 <strong>in</strong> the progeny derived from the F 1 radiated<br />
by 10 krad 60 Co γ-ray of the cross Chengte 232/Xiushui<br />
37. This study was undertaken to select the resistant mutant, to<br />
test its blast resistance spectrum, and to analyze its <strong>in</strong>heritance<br />
and allelism to the known blast resistance genes.<br />
Materials and methods<br />
We screened the M 2 population and isolated a blast-resistant<br />
mutant. It was grown from M 2 to M 8 and screened for blast<br />
reaction.<br />
A comb<strong>in</strong>ed identification of n<strong>in</strong>e different regions of<br />
Zhejiang Prov<strong>in</strong>ce was carried out for leaf blast resistance and<br />
panicle blast resistance <strong>in</strong> 1991 and 1992. To detect the resistance<br />
spectrum, 138 isolates collected from many cultivars <strong>in</strong><br />
the Tai-Hu rice region of Ch<strong>in</strong>a were used to <strong>in</strong>oculate R917<br />
and its parents for leaf blast resistance <strong>in</strong> 1992.<br />
To analyze the <strong>in</strong>heritance of resistance to blast, Nonghu<br />
6, a japonica cultivar highly susceptible to blast, was used as a<br />
female <strong>in</strong> the crosses with the resistant mutant R917 and its<br />
parents Chengte 232 and Xiushui 37 for produc<strong>in</strong>g F 1 and F 2<br />
generations. The crosses between R917 and both Chengte 232<br />
and Xiushui 37 were to test their resistance allelism. Three<br />
races, ZB13 (stra<strong>in</strong> 90-3), ZC15 (stra<strong>in</strong> 90-84), and ZE3 (stra<strong>in</strong><br />
90-86), virulent to Nonghu 6 and not to R917, Chengte 232,<br />
and Xiushui 37, were genetically stable and were used for genetic<br />
analysis of resistance.<br />
To test the allelic relationships between R917 and the<br />
13 known resistance genes, R917 and 13 Japanese differential<br />
varieties were <strong>in</strong>oculated us<strong>in</strong>g seven Japanese differential<br />
stra<strong>in</strong>s. In view of the same reaction pattern to the seven differential<br />
stra<strong>in</strong>s between R917 and Toride 1, the cross R917/<br />
Toride 1 was made to verify the allelism of their resistance<br />
after <strong>in</strong>oculat<strong>in</strong>g ZE3 (stra<strong>in</strong> 90-86) and ZC15 (stra<strong>in</strong> 90-84),<br />
which are avirulent to them.<br />
All materials for genetic analysis were sowed <strong>in</strong> trays<br />
and <strong>in</strong>oculated us<strong>in</strong>g the spray<strong>in</strong>g method at the seedl<strong>in</strong>g stage.<br />
The disease reaction was scored and evaluated 6–7 days after<br />
<strong>in</strong>oculation accord<strong>in</strong>g to the standard evaluation system. Two<br />
groups of resistance (score 1–3) and susceptibility (score 5–<br />
9) were classified <strong>in</strong> the segregat<strong>in</strong>g progeny for genetic analysis.<br />
Results and discussion<br />
A comb<strong>in</strong>ed identification of n<strong>in</strong>e different regions <strong>in</strong> Zhejiang<br />
Prov<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>in</strong>dicated that the mean scores of R917 were 2.71<br />
and 2.2 for leaf blast and 0.89 and 1.0 for panicle blast. Inoculat<strong>in</strong>g<br />
with multiple isolates showed that R917 was resistant<br />
to 136 of 138 isolates. Furthermore, R917 was resistant to<br />
isolates 91-223, 91-225, 91-267, etc., from different races,<br />
and the opposite was true for Chengte 232 and Xiushui 37.<br />
The results showed that R917 had additional resistance genes<br />
with broad-spectrum resistance different from that of the two<br />
parents.<br />
Three F 1 of Nonghu 6 crossed with R917, Chengte 232,<br />
and Xiushui 37 all showed resistance to ZB13, ZC15, and ZE3<br />
(Table 1), <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g that resistant cultivars had genes with<br />
dom<strong>in</strong>ant resistance to the three races. The F 2 population of<br />
Nonghu6/R917 showed a 3:1 ratio, suggest<strong>in</strong>g that R917 had<br />
a dom<strong>in</strong>ant gene with resistance to the three races. The F 2<br />
<strong>Genetics</strong> and breed<strong>in</strong>g of agronomic traits 33
Table 1. Segregation for blast resistance <strong>in</strong> the progenies of Nonghu 6 crossed with R917 and its two<br />
parents. a No. of resistant and χ 2<br />
Cross Race susceptible plants <strong>in</strong> F 2 P<br />
3:1 15:1 63:1<br />
Resistant Susceptible<br />
Nonghu 6/R917 ZB13 246 89 0.3592 0.50–0.75<br />
ZC15 256 76 0.6787 0.25–0.50<br />
ZE3 210 63 0.4408 0.50–0.75<br />
Nonghu 6/Chengte 232 ZB13 388 24 0.0647 0.75–0.90<br />
ZC15 308 6 0.0730 0.75–0.90<br />
ZE3 324 5 0.0247 0.75–0.90<br />
Nonghu 6/Xiushui 37 ZB13 310 23 0.1459 0.50–0.75<br />
ZC15 282 17 0.0805 0.75–0.90<br />
ZE3 304 20 0.0033 >0.90<br />
a F 1 <strong>in</strong> each cross was resistant.<br />
Table 2. Segregation for blast resistance <strong>in</strong> the progenies of R917 crossed with its two parents. a<br />
No. of resistant and χ 2<br />
Cross Race susceptible plants <strong>in</strong> F 2 P<br />
15:1 63:1<br />
Resistant Susceptible<br />
R917/Chengte 232 ZB13 377 4 0.3603 0.50–0.75<br />
ZC15 280 1 0.1469 0.50–0.75<br />
ZE3 323 2 0.0420 0.75–0.90<br />
R917/Xiushui 37 ZB13 302 6 0.0988 0.75–0.90<br />
ZC15 307 4 0.0270 0.75–0.90<br />
ZE3 279 7 0.9380 0.25–0.50<br />
a F 1 <strong>in</strong> each cross was resistant.<br />
population of Nonghu 6/Chengte 232 showed 15:1 and 63:1<br />
ratios of resistance to susceptibility to races ZB13, and ZC15<br />
and ZE3, respectively, <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g the Chengte 232 had two<br />
duplicate genes with dom<strong>in</strong>ant resistance to ZB13 and three<br />
duplicate genes with dom<strong>in</strong>ant resistance to ZC15 and ZE3.<br />
Resistance segregation <strong>in</strong> the F 2 of Nonghu6/Xiushui 37 all<br />
had a 15:1 ratio of resistance to susceptibility, suggest<strong>in</strong>g that<br />
Xiushui 37 had two duplicate genes with dom<strong>in</strong>ant resistance<br />
to the three races. The F 2 population of R917/Chengte 232<br />
showed resistance segregation with 63:1 and 255:1 ratios to<br />
ZB13, and ZC15 and ZE3, respectively (Table 2), suggest<strong>in</strong>g<br />
that the gene of R917 was nonallelic to those of Chengte 232<br />
to the three races. The F 2 population of R917/Xiushui 37<br />
showed a 63:1 ratio of resistance to susceptibility to the three<br />
races, <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g that the genes between R917 and Xiushui 37<br />
were also nonallelic.<br />
Genotype of resistance can be <strong>in</strong>ferred by the reaction<br />
to seven Japanese differential stra<strong>in</strong>s after <strong>in</strong>oculat<strong>in</strong>g Japanese<br />
differential varieties (Kiyosawa 1972). Only the Pizt gene<br />
from Toride 1 is highly resistant to all seven Japanese differential<br />
stra<strong>in</strong>s. After <strong>in</strong>oculation with the seven differential<br />
stra<strong>in</strong>s, R917 showed the same reaction pattern as Toride 1<br />
and a difference from the other differential varieties, <strong>in</strong>dicat-<br />
<strong>in</strong>g that the resistance gene of R917 was different from the<br />
genes of the 12 differential varieties.<br />
However, we found that R917 was different from Toride<br />
1 <strong>in</strong> its reaction to seven Ch<strong>in</strong>ese races. For <strong>in</strong>stance, Ch<strong>in</strong>ese<br />
isolates 89125, G9408, G9418, C9419, and C9434 were virulent<br />
to Toride 1 but not to R917, and the opposite was true for<br />
isolates S9407 and C9433. To test the allelism of resistance<br />
genes between R917 and Toride 1, an F 2 population of R917/<br />
Toride 1 was developed. R917, Toride 1, and their F 1 were all<br />
resistant to races ZC15 and ZE3, but the F 2 showed 15:1 segregation,<br />
suggest<strong>in</strong>g that the resistance genes between R917<br />
and Toride 1 were nonallelic.<br />
R917 is a semidwarf japonica mutant with strong stem,<br />
narrow and erect leaf, and monogenic broad-spectrum resistance<br />
to blast. Several new l<strong>in</strong>es such as R9421, R9425, R9427,<br />
R9784, and R9485 were bred from the cross B<strong>in</strong>g 861/R917.<br />
After <strong>in</strong>oculation with 18 Ch<strong>in</strong>ese and Japanese isolates or<br />
stra<strong>in</strong>s, R9425, R9427, and R9484 were resistant to all 18 isolates<br />
or stra<strong>in</strong>s and R9421, R9485, and the donor R917 were<br />
resistant to 17 isolates or stra<strong>in</strong>s, <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g that it is easy to<br />
transfer the blast resistance gene of R917. Some important agronomic<br />
traits of the newly bred l<strong>in</strong>es are better than those of<br />
R917, <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g that there is no l<strong>in</strong>kage drag between the blast<br />
resistance gene and other important agronomic traits <strong>in</strong> R917.<br />
34 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
References<br />
Kiyosawa S. 1972. <strong>Genetics</strong> of blast resistance. In: <strong>Rice</strong> breed<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
Los Baños (Philipp<strong>in</strong>es): <strong>International</strong> <strong>Rice</strong> Research Institute.<br />
p 203-225.<br />
Marie R, T<strong>in</strong>arelli A. 1972. <strong>Rice</strong> mutants with resistance to blast<br />
disease. Riso 21:21-24.<br />
Yamasaki Y, Kawai T. 1968. Artificial <strong>in</strong>duction of blast-resistant<br />
mutations <strong>in</strong> rice. In: <strong>Rice</strong> breed<strong>in</strong>g with <strong>in</strong>duced mutations.<br />
Tech. Rep. Ser. No. 86. Vienna (Austria): <strong>International</strong> Atomic<br />
Energy Agency. p 17-24.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ addresses: M<strong>in</strong>gxian Zhang, Jianlong Xu, Rongt<strong>in</strong>g Luo,<br />
and De Shi, Zhejiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences,<br />
Shiqiao Road 198, Hangzhou 310021, Zhejiang Prov<strong>in</strong>ce,<br />
Ch<strong>in</strong>a; Zhikang Li, Plant Breed<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>Genetics</strong>, and Biochemistry<br />
Division, <strong>IRRI</strong>.<br />
Partial resistance to rice blast <strong>in</strong> the tropics<br />
H. Kato, H. Tsunematsu, L.A. Ebron, M.J.T. Yanoria, D.M. Mercado, and G.S. Khush<br />
Partial resistance to rice blast has not been clearly dist<strong>in</strong>guished from complete resistance <strong>in</strong> the tropics. At the<br />
<strong>International</strong> <strong>Rice</strong> Research Institute (<strong>IRRI</strong>), several major genes for complete resistance to blast were identified<br />
<strong>in</strong> IR cultivars. Consequently, suitable blast isolates were selected to elim<strong>in</strong>ate the effect of these major genes<br />
for evaluat<strong>in</strong>g partial resistance to blast under field conditions. Seventy-two varieties and l<strong>in</strong>es were <strong>in</strong>oculated<br />
with three blast isolates for two seasons. Partial resistance was clearly dist<strong>in</strong>guished from complete resistance<br />
and the differences between moderate levels of resistance conferred by major genes and partial resistance were<br />
noted. The level of partial resistance varied <strong>in</strong> rice varieties: high <strong>in</strong> IR36, moderate <strong>in</strong> IR60 and IR36, and low <strong>in</strong><br />
IR50 and CO 39. These results were consistent with the results of sequential plant<strong>in</strong>g done at <strong>IRRI</strong>. Partial<br />
resistance levels of several Japanese varieties observed at <strong>IRRI</strong> were also consistent with evaluation results <strong>in</strong><br />
Japan. Significant positive correlations observed among partial resistance to the three isolates <strong>in</strong>dicate that<br />
partial resistance <strong>in</strong> the tropics is horizontal.<br />
<strong>Rice</strong> blast is recognized as the most important and potentially<br />
damag<strong>in</strong>g disease of rice. Therefore, develop<strong>in</strong>g rice varieties<br />
with durable resistance is the most feasible and environmentfriendly<br />
approach. Complete and partial resistance are known<br />
<strong>in</strong> rice and other crops. Complete resistance is a resistance identified<br />
as the <strong>in</strong>compatibility between the host resistance gene<br />
and the avirulence gene of the pathogen. Partial resistance is a<br />
resistance that reduces the extent of pathogen reproduction<br />
with<strong>in</strong> the context of a compatible <strong>in</strong>teraction.<br />
Partial resistance to blast <strong>in</strong> the tropics is not well understood<br />
for two reasons. First, most of the studies concern<strong>in</strong>g<br />
partial resistance were done <strong>in</strong> Japan and published <strong>in</strong> Japanese<br />
language (Naito and Yaegashi 1997). Second, partial resistance<br />
of the variety has to be evaluated under the conditions<br />
where the type and number of complete resistance genes are<br />
known. Until recently, complete resistance genes <strong>in</strong> tropical<br />
varieties and the reactions of natural or laboratory blast isolates<br />
to the resistance genes (pathogenicity) were not known.<br />
Such <strong>in</strong>formation is necessary to elim<strong>in</strong>ate the effect of complete<br />
resistance before partial resistance can be evaluated.<br />
Studies on partial resistance <strong>in</strong> the tropics<br />
Wang et al (1994) tried to identify partial resistance <strong>in</strong> the tropics.<br />
They used Moroberekan and CO 39 recomb<strong>in</strong>ant <strong>in</strong>bred<br />
l<strong>in</strong>es. Unfortunately, they could not obta<strong>in</strong> the virulent blast<br />
isolates aga<strong>in</strong>st Moroberekan because this variety possesses<br />
many complete resistance genes. Moreover, they used blast<br />
isolate PO6-6 to dist<strong>in</strong>guish between complete resistance<br />
(plants with no disease symptoms) and partial resistance (plants<br />
with small, moderate-type lesions). However, the isolate they<br />
used showed moderate resistant reactions to Pii, Pi3, Piz, Piz-<br />
5, and Pish (Imbe et al <strong>in</strong> press). These moderately resistant<br />
reactions are synonymous to complete resistance because the<br />
reactions are specific between PO6-6 and genes for complete<br />
resistance. As a result, partial resistance could not be dist<strong>in</strong>guished<br />
from complete resistance.<br />
Recently, the type and number of genes govern<strong>in</strong>g complete<br />
resistance to blast were analyzed <strong>in</strong> IR cultivars under an<br />
<strong>IRRI</strong>-Japan special collaborative project. The pathogenicity<br />
of Philipp<strong>in</strong>e blast isolates aga<strong>in</strong>st known complete resistance<br />
genes was then identified. By us<strong>in</strong>g this <strong>in</strong>formation and materials,<br />
we tried to identify the partial resistance of IR varieties<br />
<strong>in</strong> the tropics. We prepared the plots by surround<strong>in</strong>g them with<br />
2-m-high plastic fence to prevent the migration of blast spores<br />
from natural populations. The spreader row (first row <strong>in</strong> the<br />
plot) was <strong>in</strong>oculated with one blast isolate. Disease <strong>in</strong>tensity<br />
was evaluated us<strong>in</strong>g the Standard evaluation system for rice<br />
(SES) and the measurement of leaf area affected. Seventy-two<br />
varieties and l<strong>in</strong>es were <strong>in</strong>oculated with blast isolates PO6-6,<br />
BN111, and M36-1-3-10-1. The experiment was carried out<br />
<strong>in</strong> two seasons.<br />
<strong>Genetics</strong> and breed<strong>in</strong>g of agronomic traits 35
Partial resistance <strong>in</strong> the tropics<br />
We used the SES data obta<strong>in</strong>ed after the 3rd to 6th generations<br />
of fungus after <strong>in</strong>oculation. Resistance was calculated as the<br />
difference between the scores of each variety and those of the<br />
adjacent susceptible control (IR50). This sorted out partial resistance<br />
from complete resistance. Based on the results of our<br />
experiment, even moderate reactions from complete resistance<br />
genes showed a higher level of resistance than that of partial<br />
resistance. In the tropics, this is the first report to clearly dist<strong>in</strong>guish<br />
partial resistance from complete resistance.<br />
Partial resistance is synonymous with horizontal resistance<br />
(Naito and Yaegashi 1997). In this experiment, correlation<br />
coefficients for partial resistance to different blast isolates<br />
<strong>in</strong> different seasons were always positive. These results strongly<br />
<strong>in</strong>dicate that partial resistance is also horizontal <strong>in</strong> the tropics.<br />
There was significant positive correlation between partial resistance<br />
dur<strong>in</strong>g different seasons and isolates, but there were<br />
large differences among the average score for seasons and isolates.<br />
By us<strong>in</strong>g regression equations, we transformed the partial<br />
resistance of BN111, PO6-6 (observed <strong>in</strong> December), and<br />
M36 to the equivalent of the partial resistance of PO6-6 observed<br />
<strong>in</strong> February. Dur<strong>in</strong>g a durable blast resistance study <strong>in</strong><br />
sequential plant<strong>in</strong>gs (<strong>IRRI</strong> 1994), IR64 was reported to have<br />
lower disease severity <strong>in</strong> all 15 sequential crop cycles. Moderate<br />
levels of <strong>in</strong>fection on IR36 and IR60 were ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
throughout the whole cycle of plant<strong>in</strong>g. CO 39 and IR50 had<br />
higher disease severity. These results are quite comparable with<br />
the results of this study. Among the 50 varieties and l<strong>in</strong>es evaluated,<br />
IR64 was highly resistant (7th <strong>in</strong> rank). IR60 and IR36<br />
were moderately resistant (31st and 35th), respectively, for level<br />
of partial resistances. IR50 and CO 39 had the lowest level of<br />
partial resistance (Table 1). Aichi Asahi and US-2 are known<br />
for a very low level of partial resistance <strong>in</strong> Japan. Yashiromochi<br />
was known to have low and Reiho slightly low partial resistance.<br />
The rank<strong>in</strong>g of Yashiromochi and Reiho is largely comparable<br />
with the results of our study. We conclude that the results<br />
of our study are quite consistent with partial resistance<br />
evaluations done <strong>in</strong> the past.<br />
In this experiment, a very high blast <strong>in</strong>fection was <strong>in</strong>duced<br />
and most of the susceptible plants died with<strong>in</strong> 1 mo after<br />
<strong>in</strong>oculation. This could be attributed to shad<strong>in</strong>g provided with<br />
nets, irrigation that kept high humidity <strong>in</strong> the plots, and application<br />
of large amounts of fertilizer.<br />
A breed<strong>in</strong>g strategy for develop<strong>in</strong>g rice varieties with durable<br />
resistance to blast<br />
To breed varieties with durable resistance to rice blast, it is<br />
necessary to identify complete and partial levels of resistance<br />
on parents. First, the pathogenicity of isolates should be identified<br />
by us<strong>in</strong>g recently bred differential l<strong>in</strong>es that have only<br />
one gene for complete resistance (Tsunematsu et al 2000). Second,<br />
genes for complete resistance <strong>in</strong> each variety should be<br />
identified us<strong>in</strong>g these isolates. F<strong>in</strong>ally, by us<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>in</strong>formation<br />
about the complete resistance genes of each variety, partial<br />
resistance can be measured. However, it is possible that<br />
unknown blast-avirulent genes may exist <strong>in</strong> other countries.<br />
Therefore, a study of pathogenicity of blast races and development<br />
of “new” differential l<strong>in</strong>es for each country is necessary.<br />
References<br />
Imbe T, Tsunematsu H, Kato H, Khush GS. n.d. Genetic analysis of<br />
blast resistance <strong>in</strong> IR varieties and resistant breed<strong>in</strong>g strategy.<br />
In: Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs of the 2nd <strong>International</strong> <strong>Rice</strong> Blast Conference.<br />
(In press.)<br />
<strong>IRRI</strong> (<strong>International</strong> <strong>Rice</strong> Research Institute). 1994. Durable blast<br />
resistance <strong>in</strong> sequential plant<strong>in</strong>gs. In: Program report for 1993.<br />
Manila (Philipp<strong>in</strong>es): <strong>International</strong> <strong>Rice</strong> Research Institute.<br />
p 134-136.<br />
Naito H, Yaegashi H. 1997. <strong>Rice</strong> blast: research and control. Tokyo<br />
(Japan): Nihon Bayer Agrochem.<br />
Tsunematsu H, Yanoria MJT, Ebron LA, Hayashi N, Ando I, Kato H,<br />
Imbe T, Khush GS. 2000. Development of differential l<strong>in</strong>es<br />
with s<strong>in</strong>gle different gene for blast resistance <strong>in</strong> rice. Breed.<br />
Sci. 50:229-234.<br />
Wang GL, Mackill DJ, Bonman JM, McCouch SR, Champoux MC,<br />
Nelson RJ. 1994. RFLP mapp<strong>in</strong>g of genes conferr<strong>in</strong>g complete<br />
and partial resistance to blast <strong>in</strong> a durably resistant rice<br />
cultivar. <strong>Genetics</strong> 136:1421-1434.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ addresses: H. Kato, H. Tsunematsu, L.A. Ebron, M.J.T.<br />
Yanoria, D.M. Mercado, and G.S. Khush, Plant Breed<strong>in</strong>g,<br />
<strong>Genetics</strong>, and Biochemistry Division, <strong>International</strong> <strong>Rice</strong> Research<br />
Institute, DAPO Box 7777, Metro Manila, Philipp<strong>in</strong>es;<br />
H. Kato, current address: Tohoku National Agricultural Experimental<br />
Station, Yotsuya, Omagari, Akita 014-0102, Japan;<br />
H. Tsunematsu, current address: Faculty of Agriculture,<br />
Kyushu University, Fukuoka 812-8581, Japan.<br />
Develop<strong>in</strong>g near-isogenic l<strong>in</strong>es for blast resistance<br />
<strong>in</strong> two genotypes of <strong>in</strong>dica rice, IR24 and IR49830-7-1-2-2<br />
L.A. Ebron, Y. Fukuta, H. Kato, T. Imbe, M.J.T. Yanoria, H. Tsunematsu, D.L. Adorada, and G.S. Khush<br />
36 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics<br />
Near-isogenic l<strong>in</strong>es (NILs) for blast resistance were developed <strong>in</strong> two <strong>in</strong>dica rice genotypes, IR24 and IR49830-<br />
7-1-2-2. Eleven major resistance genes have been transferred <strong>in</strong> each cultivar follow<strong>in</strong>g the backcross breed<strong>in</strong>g<br />
method. Twelve donor parents and seven Philipp<strong>in</strong>e blast isolates were used for the selection of the target genes.<br />
Ten resistance genes, Pii, Pik, Pi1, Pi3, Pi5(t), Pi7(t), Pi9(t), Pita-2, Piz, and Piz-5 are common <strong>in</strong> both back-
grounds. Piz-t and Pita genes were <strong>in</strong>corporated <strong>in</strong>to IR49830-7-1-2-2 and IR24, respectively. The NILs of IR24<br />
and IR49830-7-1-2-2 are be<strong>in</strong>g used for genetic analysis of blast resistance and develop<strong>in</strong>g multil<strong>in</strong>es to<br />
reduce damage caused by blast.<br />
Blast, caused by Pyricularia grisea, is one of the most serious<br />
diseases of rice. Breed<strong>in</strong>g blast-resistant cultivars is a desirable<br />
means for controll<strong>in</strong>g blast. Therefore, <strong>in</strong>formation on<br />
the genetic resistance of the host cultivars is required.<br />
Genetic studies on blast resistance have revealed at least<br />
16 major genes at n<strong>in</strong>e loci (Nagato and Yoshimura 1998).<br />
Eight of these genes were identified <strong>in</strong> Japan. Little <strong>in</strong>formation<br />
is available on the number of resistance genes <strong>in</strong> tropical<br />
rice varieties. The lack of suitable differentials for identify<strong>in</strong>g<br />
genes with resistance to blast isolates may account for this<br />
limitation. A set of near-isogenic l<strong>in</strong>es (NILs) is ideal as differentials<br />
for pathogenicity tests of a pathogen useful <strong>in</strong> analyz<strong>in</strong>g<br />
the genetic constitution of resistance <strong>in</strong> a rice cultivar.<br />
In Japan, NILs with japonica-type genetic backgrounds,<br />
Nipponbare, Sasanishiki, and Toyonishiki, have been developed<br />
us<strong>in</strong>g many k<strong>in</strong>ds of resistance genes. Mackill et al (1988)<br />
developed four k<strong>in</strong>ds of NILs with an <strong>in</strong>dica-type genetic background,<br />
CO 39, for the tropics. In Japan also, several resistance<br />
genes have been <strong>in</strong>troduced <strong>in</strong>to some genetic backgrounds,<br />
but the number and k<strong>in</strong>ds of genetic background available<br />
for use <strong>in</strong> the tropics are limited.<br />
We report on the development of new NILs <strong>in</strong> two <strong>in</strong>dica<br />
rice genotypes, IR24 and IR49830-7-1-2-2.<br />
Materials and methods<br />
Two <strong>in</strong>dica-type cultivars, IR24 and IR49830-7-1-2-2, were<br />
used as genetic backgrounds for NIL development, which began<br />
<strong>in</strong> 1994. IR24, a cultivar for the irrigated ecosystem, is<br />
estimated to have three resistance genes, Pi20, Pib, and Pik-s.<br />
IR49830-7-1-2-2 is an elite l<strong>in</strong>e with a submergence tolerance<br />
gene and is estimated to have Pib and Pik-s genes with resistance<br />
to rice blast (unpublished data).<br />
Twelve donor parents, each hav<strong>in</strong>g known s<strong>in</strong>gle genes,<br />
and seven Philipp<strong>in</strong>e blast isolates were used for select<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
target genes (Table 1). Five japonica-type varieties, Kusabue,<br />
Fujisaka 5, Pi No. 4, Fukunishiki, and Toride 1, which are<br />
Japanese differentials, were used as donor parents of resistance<br />
genes. Four <strong>in</strong>dica-type l<strong>in</strong>es—C101LAC, C101PKT,<br />
C104PKT, and C101A51—which are NILs with the <strong>in</strong>dicatype<br />
variety CO 39 genetic background (Mackill et al 1988),<br />
were also used. RIL29 and RIL249 are two recomb<strong>in</strong>ant <strong>in</strong>bred<br />
l<strong>in</strong>es derived from a cross between CO 39 and<br />
Moroberekan (Wang et al 1994). WHD-IS-75-1-127 is an <strong>in</strong>trogression<br />
l<strong>in</strong>e developed from Oryza m<strong>in</strong>uta as a donor of<br />
Pi9(t) (Brar and Khush 1997).<br />
Table 1. Near-isogenic l<strong>in</strong>es with IR24 and IR49830-7-1-2-2 genetic background, 1999 dry season,<br />
<strong>IRRI</strong>.<br />
Designation Resistance Donor Generation Isolate for<br />
gene<br />
selection<br />
IR24 NILs<br />
IRBLi-F5/24 Pii Fujisaka 5 BC 6 F 5 PO6-6<br />
IRBL3-CP4/24 Pi3 C104PKT BC 6 F 5 PO6-6, PO3-82-51<br />
IRBL5-M/24 Pi5(t) RIL249 BC 6 F 5 PO6-6<br />
IRBLk-Ku/24 Pik Kusabue BC 6 F 5 PO6-6<br />
IRBL1-CL/24 Pi1 C101LAC BC 6 F 5 PO6-6<br />
IRBL7-M/24 Pi7(t) RIL29 BC 6 F 5 PO6-6<br />
IRBLta-CP1/24 Pita C101PKT BC 6 F 5 IK81-3<br />
IRBLta2-Pi/24 Pita-2 Pi No. 4 BC 6 F 5 IK81-3<br />
IRBLz5-CA/24 Piz-5 C101A51 BC 6 F 5 PO6-6, IK81-3<br />
IRBLz-Fu/24 Piz Fukunishiki BC 6 F 3 M64-1-3-9-1, IK81-25<br />
BC 6 F 2 PO6-6<br />
IRBL9-W/24 Pi9(t) WHD-IS-75-1-127 BC 6 F 5 PO6-6<br />
IR49830-7-1-2-2 NILs<br />
IRBLi-F5/RL Pii Fujisaka 5 BC 6 F 5 PO6-6, BN111, PO3-82-51<br />
IRBL3-CP4/RL Pi3 C104PKT BC 6 F 4 PO6-6<br />
IRBL5-M/RL Pi5(t) RIL249 BC 6 F 4 PO6-6<br />
IRBLk-Ku/RL Pik Kusabue BC 6 F 5 PO6-6<br />
IRBL1-CL/RL Pi1 C101LAC BC 6 F 3 PO6-6<br />
IRBL7-M/RL Pi7(t) RIL29 BC 6 F 4 PO6-6<br />
IRBLta2-Pi/RL Pita-2 Pi No. 4 BC 6 F 5 JMB8401, BN111<br />
IRBLz-Fu/RL Piz Fukunishiki BC 6 F 5 PO6-6, JMB8401<br />
IRBLz5-CA/RL Piz-5 C101A51 BC 6 F 4 PO6-6, JMB8401<br />
IRBLzt-T/RL Piz-t Toride 1 BC 6 F 5 JMB8401<br />
IRBL9-M/RL Pi9(t) WHD-IS-75-1-127 BC 6 F 4 PO6-6<br />
<strong>Genetics</strong> and breed<strong>in</strong>g of agronomic traits 37
Recurrent<br />
parent<br />
X<br />
Donor<br />
parent<br />
ence of resistance genes, BC 6 F 3 and BC 6 F 4 l<strong>in</strong>es were <strong>in</strong>oculated<br />
with representative isolates.<br />
In the evaluation of blast resistance, scor<strong>in</strong>g for disease<br />
was done us<strong>in</strong>g a 0–5 scale based on the Standard evaluation<br />
system for rice (<strong>IRRI</strong> 1998).<br />
BC 6 F 1<br />
BC 3 F 1<br />
Resistant<br />
plants<br />
BC 6 F 2<br />
BC 6 F 3<br />
BC 6 F 4<br />
BC 2 F 1<br />
Resistant<br />
plants<br />
BC 1 F 1<br />
Resistant<br />
plants<br />
F 1<br />
Inoculate and select<br />
resistant plants<br />
Inoculate and select<br />
resistant plants<br />
Inoculate and select<br />
resistant plants<br />
Grow<br />
Grow and check for similarity with<br />
recurrent parent<br />
Inoculate and check similarity with<br />
recurrent parent<br />
Inoculate and check similarity with<br />
recurrent parent<br />
Fig. 1. Scheme for NIL development by the backcross<br />
method.<br />
The backcross progenies were screened for resistance<br />
by <strong>in</strong>oculat<strong>in</strong>g them with an <strong>in</strong>compatible isolate. Selected<br />
plants were then used <strong>in</strong> the next backcross<strong>in</strong>g cycle (Fig. 1).<br />
This procedure was repeated until the sixth backcross. The<br />
BC 6 F 2 progenies were grown and selected based on their morphological<br />
similarity to the recurrent parent. To verify the pres-<br />
Results and discussion<br />
Eleven k<strong>in</strong>ds of major resistance genes were transferred <strong>in</strong>to<br />
each background of IR24 and IR49830-7-1-2-2 follow<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
backcross breed<strong>in</strong>g method until 1999 (Table 1, Fig. 1). The<br />
designation of each NIL was based on the <strong>in</strong>troduced resistance<br />
gene, donor, and genetic background. For <strong>in</strong>stance,<br />
IRBLi-F5/24 is a NIL with resistance gene Pii from Fujisaka 5<br />
as the donor parent developed <strong>in</strong> the IR24 background.<br />
Seven of the 11 NILs developed <strong>in</strong> the background of<br />
IR24 consisted of Pi1, Pi5(t), Pi7(t), Pi9(t), Pita, Pita-2, and<br />
Piz-5; these genes showed a resistant reaction to the <strong>in</strong>compatible<br />
isolate. The three NILs—IRBLi-F5/24, IRBL3-CP4/<br />
24, and IRBLz-Fu/24—that carry the resistance genes Pii, Pi3,<br />
and Piz, respectively, showed a resistant to moderately resistant<br />
reaction. The NIL IRBLta-CP1/24, with Pita, was developed<br />
<strong>in</strong> the background of IR24 only.<br />
NILs <strong>in</strong> the background of IR49830-7-1-2-2 consisted<br />
of 11 l<strong>in</strong>es that had the resistance genes Pii, Pi1, Pi3, Pi5(t),<br />
Pi7(t), Pi9(t), Pik, Pita-2, Piz, Piz-5, and Piz-t.<br />
In the tropics, resistance to blast <strong>in</strong> rice cultivars is controlled<br />
by several genes (Mackill et al 1985), which made the<br />
identification of genes for blast resistance difficult. Through<br />
allelic tests us<strong>in</strong>g these NILs and Japanese differentials, Inukai<br />
et al (1994) identified four resistance genes, Pi1, Pi2(t) (allelic<br />
or closely l<strong>in</strong>ked to Piz), Pi3, and Pi4-a(t) (allelic or<br />
closely l<strong>in</strong>ked to Pita). Such a set of NILs would be easier to<br />
cross with <strong>in</strong>dica cultivars for use <strong>in</strong> gene identification. IR24<br />
is a cultivar grown <strong>in</strong> several tropical Asian regions, whereas<br />
IR49830-7-1-2-2 is an elite l<strong>in</strong>e suitable for the ra<strong>in</strong>fed lowland<br />
ecosystem. The IR24 and IR49830-7-1-2-2 NILs will be<br />
good sources of resistance genes because each major gene, <strong>in</strong><br />
addition to already exist<strong>in</strong>g genes <strong>in</strong> the host, can be transferred<br />
easily to desired <strong>in</strong>dica backgrounds by backcross breed<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
Each NIL of IR49830-7-1-2-2 and IR24 has at least three<br />
or four genes for blast resistance. The pyramided genes may<br />
provide extra protection from blast to the host when grown <strong>in</strong><br />
the field. S<strong>in</strong>gle-gene resistance breaks down easily, especially<br />
aga<strong>in</strong>st a highly variable pathogen such as the blast fungus.<br />
These NILs can be used to confirm the effect of gene<br />
pyramid<strong>in</strong>g on the number of genes and their complementary<br />
effect.<br />
Moreover, these NILs will be useful for develop<strong>in</strong>g<br />
multil<strong>in</strong>es to reduce damage caused by blast. When some of<br />
these NILs carry<strong>in</strong>g s<strong>in</strong>gle genes are comb<strong>in</strong>ed, the genetic<br />
diversity present <strong>in</strong> the plant population may help reduce the<br />
amount of <strong>in</strong>oculum needed for blast development. Field trials<br />
with multil<strong>in</strong>es will be carried out for the first time <strong>in</strong> the<br />
tropics.<br />
38 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
References<br />
Brar DS, Khush GS. 1997. Alien <strong>in</strong>trogression <strong>in</strong> rice. Plant Mol.<br />
Biol. 35:35-47.<br />
Inukai T, Nelson RJ, Zeigler RS, Sarkarung S, Mackill DJ, Bonman<br />
JM, Takamure I, K<strong>in</strong>oshita T. 1994. Allelism of blast resistance<br />
genes <strong>in</strong> near-isogenic l<strong>in</strong>es of rice. Phytopathology<br />
84:1278-1283.<br />
<strong>IRRI</strong> (<strong>International</strong> <strong>Rice</strong> Research Institute). 1998. Standard evaluation<br />
system for rice. Los Baños (Philipp<strong>in</strong>es): <strong>International</strong><br />
<strong>Rice</strong> Research Institute. 52 p.<br />
Mackill DJ, Bonman JM, Suh HS, Sril<strong>in</strong>gam R. 1985. Genes for<br />
resistance to Philipp<strong>in</strong>e isolates of the rice blast pathogen.<br />
<strong>Rice</strong> Genet. Newsl. 2:80-81.<br />
Mackill DJ, Bonman JM, Tenorio PD, Vergel de Dios TI. 1988. Nearisogenic<br />
<strong>in</strong>dica rice l<strong>in</strong>es with blast resistance genes. <strong>Rice</strong><br />
Genet. Newsl. 5:98-101.<br />
Nagato Y, Yoshimura A. 1998. Report of the Committee on Gene<br />
Symbolization, Nomenclature and L<strong>in</strong>kage Groups. <strong>Rice</strong><br />
Genet. Newsl. 15:13-74.<br />
Wang GL, Mackill DJ, Bonman JM, McCouch SR, Champoux MC,<br />
Nelson RJ. 1994. RFLP mapp<strong>in</strong>g of genes conferr<strong>in</strong>g complete<br />
and partial resistance to blast <strong>in</strong> a durably resistant rice<br />
cultivar. <strong>Genetics</strong> 136:1421-1434.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ addresses: L.A. Ebron, Y. Fukuta, M.J.T. Yanoria, H.<br />
Tsunematsu, D.L. Adorada, G.S. Khush, Plant Breed<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>Genetics</strong>,<br />
and Biochemistry Division, <strong>IRRI</strong>, DAPO Box 7777,<br />
Metro Manila, Philipp<strong>in</strong>es; H. Kato, Tohoku National Agricultural<br />
Experimental Station, Yotsuya, Omagari, Akita 014-<br />
0102; T. Imbe, <strong>Rice</strong> Breed<strong>in</strong>g Laboratory, National Agricultural<br />
Research Center, Tsukuba 305-8666, Japan.<br />
Develop<strong>in</strong>g near-isogenic l<strong>in</strong>es for rice blast resistance<br />
H. Tsunematsu, M.J.T. Yanoria, L.A. Ebron, N. Hayashi, I. Ando, D.M. Mercado, H. Kato, Y. Fukuta, and T. Imbe<br />
To develop near-isogenic l<strong>in</strong>es (NILs) for genetic and pathological studies of rice blast, we have begun to <strong>in</strong>corporate<br />
all the known blast resistance genes <strong>in</strong>to the same genetic background us<strong>in</strong>g the backcross breed<strong>in</strong>g<br />
method. Varieties and l<strong>in</strong>es with known genes for resistance were used as donors. Lijiangx<strong>in</strong>tuanheigu (LTH)<br />
(japonica, highly susceptible) and CO 39 (<strong>in</strong>dica with Pia, broadly susceptible) were used as recurrent parents.<br />
BC 1<br />
F 1<br />
plants with a s<strong>in</strong>gle resistance gene were selected with an avirulent isolate and backcrossed. These plants<br />
were <strong>in</strong>oculated and resistant plants were backcrossed until the BC 6<br />
F 1<br />
. The resistant BC 6<br />
F 1<br />
plants were selfpoll<strong>in</strong>ated<br />
and BC 6<br />
F 2<br />
families were obta<strong>in</strong>ed. These BC 6<br />
F 2<br />
families were selected for their morphological similarity<br />
to their respective recurrent parent and self-poll<strong>in</strong>ated. BC 6<br />
F 3<br />
l<strong>in</strong>es were <strong>in</strong>oculated and resistant homozygous<br />
l<strong>in</strong>es were selected. These BC 6<br />
F 3<br />
l<strong>in</strong>es were selected <strong>in</strong> the field for their similarity to the recurrent parent and for<br />
the uniformity of the morphological traits <strong>in</strong> each l<strong>in</strong>e. F<strong>in</strong>ally, it was confirmed that each l<strong>in</strong>e has a s<strong>in</strong>gle and<br />
homozygous resistance gene <strong>in</strong> the BC 6<br />
F 4<br />
. To date, we developed 22 NILs for 17 known resistance genes with<br />
the LTH genetic background and 22 NILs for 17 known genes with the CO 39 genetic background. A set of NILs<br />
with the LTH background could be suitable for use as differentials for rice blast. The NILs we developed <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>dica<br />
and japonica backgrounds would contribute to genetic and pathological studies of rice blast.<br />
Blast is one of the most destructive diseases of rice <strong>in</strong> both<br />
temperate and tropical regions. Breed<strong>in</strong>g varieties resistant to<br />
blast is the most effective way to control the disease. Information<br />
about resistance genes <strong>in</strong> rice cultivars and pathogenicities<br />
of blast isolates is important for breed<strong>in</strong>g, genetic, and<br />
pathological studies of rice blast. The use of near-isogenic l<strong>in</strong>es<br />
(NILs) with a s<strong>in</strong>gle blast resistance gene offers several advantages<br />
for researchers study<strong>in</strong>g rice blast. A set of NILs is<br />
ideal as differentials for pathogenicity tests of a pathogen (Flor<br />
1956). The genetic constitution of resistance genes <strong>in</strong> a rice<br />
cultivar would be known through allelic tests with NILs. We<br />
tried to <strong>in</strong>corporate all the known blast resistance genes <strong>in</strong>to<br />
the same genetic background us<strong>in</strong>g the backcross breed<strong>in</strong>g<br />
method at the <strong>International</strong> <strong>Rice</strong> Research Institute (<strong>IRRI</strong>).<br />
Selection and confirmation of the existence of Pia, Pik-s, and<br />
Pish <strong>in</strong> the l<strong>in</strong>es were carried out at the National Agriculture<br />
Research Center (NARC) <strong>in</strong> Japan through the Japan-<strong>IRRI</strong><br />
shuttle research project.<br />
Plant material<br />
To develop two sets of NILs, we applied the backcross breed<strong>in</strong>g<br />
method. Varieties and l<strong>in</strong>es with known genes for resistance<br />
were used as donors. <strong>Rice</strong> cultivar Lijiangx<strong>in</strong>tuanheigu<br />
(LTH) and CO 39 were used as recurrent parents. LTH, a<br />
japonica variety from Yunnan Prov<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a, is highly susceptible<br />
to rice blast. No complete resistance gene for rice blast<br />
has been identified <strong>in</strong> LTH. CO 39 is an <strong>in</strong>dica variety hav<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Pia and it has shown broadly susceptible reactions to Philipp<strong>in</strong>e<br />
blast isolates.<br />
Twenty-one and 19 resistance donors were crossed with<br />
LTH and CO 39, respectively. Each F 1 plant was then backcrossed<br />
to the respective recurrent parent. BC 1 F 1 plants were<br />
<strong>in</strong>oculated with an avirulent isolate to select the plants with a<br />
s<strong>in</strong>gle resistance gene at <strong>IRRI</strong>. Some of the BC 1 F 1 plants were<br />
self-poll<strong>in</strong>ated and the derived BC 1 F 2 families were <strong>in</strong>oculated<br />
with suitable isolates at both <strong>IRRI</strong> and NARC. BC 1 F 2 families<br />
<strong>Genetics</strong> and breed<strong>in</strong>g of agronomic traits 39
with a s<strong>in</strong>gle resistance gene <strong>in</strong> the heterozygous condition<br />
were selected. The selected BC 1 F 2 plants were backcrossed to<br />
the respective recurrent parent. BC 1 F 1 plants were <strong>in</strong>oculated<br />
and resistant plants were backcrossed until the BC 6 F 1 . The<br />
resistant BC 6 F 1 plants were self-poll<strong>in</strong>ated and BC 6 F 2 families<br />
were obta<strong>in</strong>ed. These BC 6 F 2 families were selected for<br />
their morphological similarity to the recurrent parent and selfpoll<strong>in</strong>ated.<br />
BC 6 F 3 l<strong>in</strong>es were <strong>in</strong>oculated with an avirulent isolate<br />
and resistant homozygous l<strong>in</strong>es were selected. These BC 6 F 3<br />
l<strong>in</strong>es were observed <strong>in</strong> the field and selected for their similarity<br />
to the recurrent parent and for uniformity of morphological<br />
traits <strong>in</strong> each l<strong>in</strong>e. F<strong>in</strong>ally, it was confirmed that each l<strong>in</strong>e has<br />
a s<strong>in</strong>gle and homozygous resistance gene <strong>in</strong> the BC 6 F 4 . All of<br />
the materials with the LTH genetic background were planted<br />
under long-day treatment to extend the grow<strong>in</strong>g period because<br />
most of the l<strong>in</strong>es probably carry photosensitivity <strong>in</strong>herited from<br />
LTH. A 30-m<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>terruption of the dark period was performed<br />
as a long-day treatment from 21 d after seed<strong>in</strong>g (DAS) to 70–<br />
75 DAS.<br />
Inoculation method<br />
A maximum of 20 pregerm<strong>in</strong>ated seeds of a l<strong>in</strong>e was used.<br />
Inoculation was performed at the 4.0- to 4.9-leaf seedl<strong>in</strong>g stage<br />
by us<strong>in</strong>g the spray<strong>in</strong>g method (Inukai et al 1994, Hayashi et al<br />
1998). Each seedl<strong>in</strong>g was exam<strong>in</strong>ed 5–7 d after <strong>in</strong>oculation<br />
us<strong>in</strong>g a modified classification based on a 0–5 scale (Mackill<br />
and Bonman 1992). All the isolates of Pyricularia grisea used<br />
at <strong>IRRI</strong> were either ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed as stock cultures at its Entomology<br />
and Plant Pathology Division or were isolated from<br />
its blast nursery. All the isolates used at NARC were ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
at the NARC <strong>Rice</strong> Pathology Laboratory.<br />
Development of the l<strong>in</strong>es<br />
Only one resistance gene was transferred from a donor hav<strong>in</strong>g<br />
more than one resistance gene. As an example, Aichi Asahi,<br />
one of the Japanese differential varieties, carries two blast resistance<br />
genes, Pia (Yamasaki and Kiyosawa 1966) and Pi19(t)<br />
(Hayashi et al 1998). Aichi Asahi was used as a donor for Pia<br />
with the genetic background of LTH. We have not found any<br />
isolate <strong>in</strong>compatible to Pi19(t) at <strong>IRRI</strong> and the existence of<br />
the gene was determ<strong>in</strong>ed at NARC. Aichi Asahi was crossed<br />
and backcrossed with LTH. The BC 1 F 1 plants were selfed and<br />
the BC 1 F 2 families were <strong>in</strong>oculated with Ina72 (Av-a and Av-<br />
19+) and CHNOS58-3-1 (Av-a+ and Av-19) at NARC. For<br />
select<strong>in</strong>g the NIL with Pia, a family that showed segregation<br />
for resistance to Ina72 and a susceptible reaction to CHNOS58-<br />
3-1 was selected. This family was expected to be heterozygous<br />
for Pia but lacked Pi19(t). The same BC 1 F 2 families were<br />
<strong>in</strong>oculated with B90002 (Av-a and Av-19+) and C923-49 (Ava<br />
and Av-19+) at <strong>IRRI</strong>. The segregation pattern of Pia <strong>in</strong> these<br />
l<strong>in</strong>es was identical at both NARC and <strong>IRRI</strong>. The resistant plants<br />
(regarded as the resistant BC 1 F 1 plants) <strong>in</strong> the selected BC 1 F 2<br />
family were backcrossed with LTH. Backcross plants were<br />
<strong>in</strong>oculated with B90002 and resistant plants were backcrossed<br />
Table 1. Near-isogenic l<strong>in</strong>es for blast resistance with LTH background.<br />
NIL Resistance Donor Generation<br />
gene<br />
IRBLa-A/LT Pia Aichi Asahi BC 6 F 5<br />
IRBLa-Ze/LT Pia Zenith BC 6 F 4<br />
IRBLks-S/LT Piks Sh<strong>in</strong> 2 BC 6 F 4<br />
IRBLks-B4/LT Piks B40 BC 6 F 4<br />
IRBLk-Ka/LT Pik Kanto 51 BC 6 F 4<br />
IRBLkp-K60/LT Pikp K60 BC 6 F 4<br />
IRBLkh-K3/LT Pikh K3 BC 6 F 4<br />
IRBLz-Ze/LT Piz Zenith BC 6 F 4<br />
IRBLz5-CA /LT Piz-5 C101A51 BC 6 F 6<br />
IRBLzt-T/LT Piz-t Toride 1 BC 6 F 5<br />
IRBLta-Ta/LT Pita Tadukan BC 6 F 4<br />
IRBLta-K1/LT Pita K1 BC 6 F 4<br />
IRBLta-CP1/LT Pita C101PKT BC 6 F 6<br />
IRBLta-CT2/LT Pita C105TTP2L9 BC 6 F 6<br />
IRBLb-B/LT Pib BL1 BC 6 F 4<br />
IRBLsh-Fu/LT Pish Fukunishiki BC 6 F 5<br />
IRBL1-CL/LT Pi1 C101LAC BC 6 F 6<br />
IRBL3-CP4/LT Pi3 C104PKT BC 6 F 6<br />
IRBL5-M/LT Pi5(t) RIL249 a BC 6 F 6<br />
IRBL7-M/LT Pi7(t) RIL29 a BC 6 F 6<br />
IRBL9-W/LT Pi9(t) WHD-1S-75-1-127 BC 6 F 6<br />
IRBL11-Zh/LT Pi11(t) Zhaiyeq<strong>in</strong>g 8 BC 6 F 4<br />
a Recomb<strong>in</strong>ant <strong>in</strong>bred l<strong>in</strong>es from a cross of CO 39 and Moroberekan.<br />
Source: Wang et al (1994).<br />
with LTH. This procedure was repeated until BC 6 F 1 . The resistant<br />
BC 6 F 1 plants were self-poll<strong>in</strong>ated and the BC 6 F 2 families<br />
were obta<strong>in</strong>ed.<br />
These BC 6 F 2 families were selected for their morphological<br />
similarity to LTH and self-poll<strong>in</strong>ated. The BC 6 F 3 l<strong>in</strong>es<br />
were <strong>in</strong>oculated with B90002. The l<strong>in</strong>es that were homozygous-resistant<br />
to the isolate were selected. Thus, these selected<br />
l<strong>in</strong>es were homozygous-resistant to Pia but did not carry<br />
Pi19(t). The morphological traits of the selected BC 6 F 3 l<strong>in</strong>es<br />
were observed and selected for their similarity to LTH and for<br />
uniformity <strong>in</strong> each l<strong>in</strong>e. The selected BC 6 F 3 l<strong>in</strong>es were selfpoll<strong>in</strong>ated.<br />
The BC 6 F 4 l<strong>in</strong>es were <strong>in</strong>oculated with B90002, and<br />
it was confirmed that each l<strong>in</strong>e has Pia <strong>in</strong> the homozygous<br />
condition.<br />
To develop other l<strong>in</strong>es, selection with suitable isolates<br />
and backcross<strong>in</strong>g procedures were carried out <strong>in</strong> the same way<br />
as for Aichi Asahi. For the NILs with the genetic background<br />
of LTH, a total of 22 NILs with 17 resistance genes were developed<br />
from the 21 resistance donors (Table 1). For NILs<br />
with the genetic background of CO 39, a total of 22 NILs with<br />
17 resistance genes were developed from the 19 resistance<br />
donors. These NILs were designated as IRBL, followed by<br />
the resistance gene and an abbreviation for the resistance donor<br />
with the genetic background. For example, IRBLa-A/LT<br />
is the NIL with Pia developed from Aichi Asahi with the LTH<br />
genetic background. NILs with only the major resistance genes<br />
were developed and genes conferr<strong>in</strong>g partial resistance were<br />
not considered <strong>in</strong> this study.<br />
40 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
The NILs we developed would contribute to genetic and<br />
pathological studies of rice blast. A set of NILs with the LTH<br />
background could be used as differential varieties for rice blast.<br />
Two sets of NILs would be appropriate for the genetic studies<br />
and breed<strong>in</strong>g of blast-resistant japonica and <strong>in</strong>dica varieties.<br />
Development of the NILs with the rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g resistance genes<br />
is under way.<br />
Wang GL, Mackill DJ, Bonman JM, McCouch SR, Champoux MC,<br />
Nelson RJ. 1994. RFLP mapp<strong>in</strong>g of genes conferr<strong>in</strong>g complete<br />
and partial resistance to blast <strong>in</strong> a durably resistant rice<br />
cultivar. <strong>Genetics</strong> 136:1421-1434.<br />
Yamasaki Y, Kiyosawa S. 1966. Studies on <strong>in</strong>heritance of resistance<br />
of rice varieties to blast. 1. Inheritance of resistance of Japanese<br />
varieties to several stra<strong>in</strong>s of the fungus. Bull. Natl. Inst.<br />
Agric. Sci. D14:39-69. (In Japanese with English summary.)<br />
References<br />
Flor HH. 1956 The complementary genetic systems <strong>in</strong> flax and flax<br />
rust. Adv. Genet. 8:29-54.<br />
Hayashi N, Ando I, Imbe T. 1998. Identification of a new resistance<br />
gene to a Ch<strong>in</strong>ese blast fungus isolate <strong>in</strong> the Japanese rice<br />
cultivar Aichi Asahi. Phytopathology 88:822-827.<br />
Inukai T, Nelson RJ, Zeigler RS, Sarkarung S, Mackill DJ, Bonman<br />
JM, Takamure I, K<strong>in</strong>oshita T. 1994. Allelism of blast resistance<br />
genes <strong>in</strong> near-isogenic l<strong>in</strong>es of rice. Phytopathology<br />
84:1278-1283.<br />
Mackill DJ, Bonman JM. 1992. Inheritance of blast resistance <strong>in</strong><br />
near-isogenic l<strong>in</strong>es of rice. Phytopathology 82:746-749.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ addresses: H. Tsunematsu, Plant Breed<strong>in</strong>g Laboratory,<br />
Kyushu University, Fukuoka 812-8581, Japan; M.J.T. Yanoria,<br />
L.A. Ebron, D.M. Mercado, and Y. Fukuta, Plant Breed<strong>in</strong>g,<br />
<strong>Genetics</strong>, and Biochemistry Division, <strong>International</strong> <strong>Rice</strong> Research<br />
Institute, DAPO Box 7777, Metro Manila, Philipp<strong>in</strong>es;<br />
N. Hayashi, Aichi-ken Agricultural Research Center, Aichi<br />
441-2513, Japan; I. Ando, HNAES, Hokkaido 062-8555, Japan;<br />
H. Kato, TNAES, Akita 014-0102, Japan; T. Imbe,<br />
NARC, Tsukuba 305-8666, Japan.<br />
Improv<strong>in</strong>g field resistance to blast and eat<strong>in</strong>g quality<br />
<strong>in</strong> Japanese rice varieties<br />
Y. Uehara<br />
Eat<strong>in</strong>g quality of gra<strong>in</strong>s is the most important character <strong>in</strong> Japanese rice cropp<strong>in</strong>g because of consumer needs<br />
and producers’ rice price. Disease and <strong>in</strong>sect resistance is also an important character because of environmental<br />
protection and health care. Blast resistance, especially field resistance, is a major objective of rice breed<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>in</strong> Japan. One of the best-tast<strong>in</strong>g varieties, Koshihikari, is the lead<strong>in</strong>g variety <strong>in</strong> Japan, cropped on 539,000 ha<br />
<strong>in</strong> 1999 (it occupied 34.6% of the rice-cropp<strong>in</strong>g area <strong>in</strong> Japan). But as Koshihikari lodges easily and is sensitive<br />
to blast disease, breed<strong>in</strong>g of new superior-tast<strong>in</strong>g varieties with resistance to blast and tolerance of lodg<strong>in</strong>g is<br />
required. So far, we released a superior-tast<strong>in</strong>g variety, K<strong>in</strong>uhikari, <strong>in</strong> 1989, which had tolerance of lodg<strong>in</strong>g. This<br />
variety orig<strong>in</strong>ated from IR8 and a short-culm mutation l<strong>in</strong>e of K<strong>in</strong>uhikari, Doktokoi, was released <strong>in</strong> 1995 by<br />
improv<strong>in</strong>g K<strong>in</strong>uhikari, and a new superior-tast<strong>in</strong>g variety will be released soon. Us<strong>in</strong>g K<strong>in</strong>uhikari as a parent, its<br />
progeny l<strong>in</strong>es with a short culm were tolerant of lodg<strong>in</strong>g; thus, many good-tast<strong>in</strong>g varieties, such as Dontokoi,<br />
Yumetukushi, Yumehitachi, Awam<strong>in</strong>ori, and so on, were selected from its progeny. As Dontokoi is resistant to<br />
blast and tolerant of lodg<strong>in</strong>g, has a high yield<strong>in</strong>g ability, and tolerates sprout<strong>in</strong>g compared with K<strong>in</strong>uhikari, it<br />
should be possible to release the succeed<strong>in</strong>g variety of Koshihikari early by us<strong>in</strong>g Dontokoi as a parent.<br />
Eat<strong>in</strong>g quality of gra<strong>in</strong>s is the most important character <strong>in</strong> Japanese<br />
rice. Blast resistance, especially field resistance, is a major<br />
objective of rice breed<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Japan. One of the best-tast<strong>in</strong>g<br />
varieties, Koshihikari, is the lead<strong>in</strong>g variety <strong>in</strong> Japan, occupy<strong>in</strong>g<br />
34.6% of the rice-cropp<strong>in</strong>g area <strong>in</strong> the country. Koshihikari,<br />
however, is susceptible to blast and also to lodg<strong>in</strong>g; thus, breed<strong>in</strong>g<br />
for new superior-tast<strong>in</strong>g varieties with resistance to blast<br />
and tolerance for lodg<strong>in</strong>g is necessary. We released a superior-tast<strong>in</strong>g<br />
variety, K<strong>in</strong>uhikari (Koga et al 1989), with tolerance<br />
for lodg<strong>in</strong>g, and with a short culm, orig<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g from IR8<br />
and its improved short-culm mutant l<strong>in</strong>e, Dontokoi (Uehara et<br />
al 1995). A new superior-tast<strong>in</strong>g variety was released <strong>in</strong> 2000<br />
by improv<strong>in</strong>g Dontokoi. Currently, few varieties have superior<br />
taste, resistance to blast, and tolerance for lodg<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
Materials and methods<br />
Japanese varieties Toyonishiki (TN), Koganenishiki (KN),<br />
Yoneshiro (YS), Hownenwase (HW), Sasanishiki (SN),<br />
Inabawase (IW), Koshihikari (KHI), and Koshihomare (KHO)<br />
were used as parents. These were different from leaf-blastresistant<br />
varieties; TN and KN are resistant, YS is moderately<br />
resistant, HW and SN are moderately susceptible, and KHI<br />
and KHO are susceptible. These varieties were used <strong>in</strong> diallel<br />
<strong>Genetics</strong> and breed<strong>in</strong>g of agronomic traits 41
Table 1. Disease rat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dex for evaluat<strong>in</strong>g varietal field resistance to leaf blast<br />
<strong>in</strong> rice.<br />
Disease rate Disease reaction Lesion area (%)<br />
(<strong>in</strong>dex)<br />
0 No sensitive lesion 0<br />
1 A few sensitive lesions 1<br />
2 Apparently sensitive lesions 2<br />
3 Much more sensitive lesions 5<br />
4 Many sensitive lesions 10<br />
5 Many sensitive lesions or a few dead seedl<strong>in</strong>gs 20<br />
6 Apparently dead seedl<strong>in</strong>gs 40<br />
7 About 50% of seedl<strong>in</strong>gs dead 60<br />
8 Many seedl<strong>in</strong>gs dead 80<br />
9 Almost all seedl<strong>in</strong>gs dead 90<br />
10 All seedl<strong>in</strong>gs dead 100<br />
crosses, F 3 l<strong>in</strong>es were tested for leaf blast resistance <strong>in</strong> the<br />
upland nursery, disease rate was studied (Table 1), and broadsense<br />
heritability was evaluated. This test<strong>in</strong>g method <strong>in</strong> the<br />
upland nursery (upland late sow<strong>in</strong>g or ULS method) is commonly<br />
used for evaluat<strong>in</strong>g field resistance to blast of varieties<br />
and l<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong> Japan sown later, and is used when conditions are<br />
favorable s<strong>in</strong>ce blast occurs dur<strong>in</strong>g the ra<strong>in</strong>y season.<br />
IW was crossed with TN, KN, YS, HW, SN, KHI, and<br />
KHO and F 3 progenies from these crosses were sown <strong>in</strong> the<br />
upland nursery. One cross<strong>in</strong>g occupied a 3-m 2 area planted to<br />
100 g (about 4,000–4,300 gra<strong>in</strong>s) of seeds. Survival from blast<br />
<strong>in</strong>fection <strong>in</strong> the upland nursery was determ<strong>in</strong>ed by count<strong>in</strong>g<br />
the number of head<strong>in</strong>g plants, sterile plants (caused by panicle<br />
blast or cool damage), and immature plants (caused by late<br />
head<strong>in</strong>g).<br />
The F 4 bulk population of IW/YS was sown <strong>in</strong> a 1.5-m 2<br />
area <strong>in</strong> the upland nursery (mass selection plot) and flooded<br />
nursery (control), respectively, to exam<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> the advanced<br />
generation the effects of mass selection on field resistance of<br />
blast <strong>in</strong> early generations. In these nurseries, one ripen<strong>in</strong>g<br />
panicle was picked from surviv<strong>in</strong>g plants. Panicles of F 5 l<strong>in</strong>es<br />
were selected randomly and 400 and about 500 panicle-row<br />
l<strong>in</strong>es were planted <strong>in</strong> the mass selection plot and <strong>in</strong> the control<br />
nursery, respectively. F 6 l<strong>in</strong>es—221 l<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong> the mass selection<br />
plot and 423 l<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong> the control—were tested for leaf blast<br />
resistance by the ULS method.<br />
F 3 progenies of KHI/Shu 3810 were sown on a 1.5-m 2<br />
area <strong>in</strong> a flooded nursery established <strong>in</strong> a blast location. The<br />
F 4 progenies were planted as a s<strong>in</strong>gle-plant selection and were<br />
selected by stand observation and by gra<strong>in</strong> quality. F 5 progenies<br />
were planted to evaluate cultivated characteristics and<br />
eat<strong>in</strong>g quality by s<strong>in</strong>gle pedigree, and were evaluated for field<br />
resistance to blast with parental and check varieties by the ULS<br />
method.<br />
In addition, 609 F 5 progenies of 14 crosses with Dontokoi<br />
as a parent were planted to evaluate eat<strong>in</strong>g quality by s<strong>in</strong>gle<br />
pedigree and field resistance to blast.<br />
Results and discussion<br />
Heritability of field resistance to blast <strong>in</strong> the F 3<br />
The genotype for rice blast of TN and SN is Pia, and that of<br />
YS, IW, and KHO is Pii. KN, HW, and KHI do not possess<br />
any resistance genes for blast. S<strong>in</strong>ce pathogenic fungi (code:<br />
007) for blast disease <strong>in</strong> the test nursery could <strong>in</strong>jure all test<br />
varieties, the disease rate of parental varieties was used to reflect<br />
their field resistance to rice blast. The mean disease rate<br />
of F 3 progenies <strong>in</strong>dicated middle values, but these were lower<br />
than the mean among parents <strong>in</strong> many crosses and lower than<br />
that of resistant parents <strong>in</strong> some crosses (Table 2).<br />
Broad-sense heritabilities <strong>in</strong> diallel crosses for leaf blast<br />
ranged from 0.107 to 0.840 and were high. In cases where<br />
differences <strong>in</strong> blast resistance between parents were small, such<br />
as <strong>in</strong> crosses between resistant and moderately resistant varieties,<br />
and between susceptible and moderately susceptible varieties,<br />
broad-sense heritabilities were comparatively low.<br />
Broad-sense heritabilities <strong>in</strong> some crosses were also low <strong>in</strong><br />
crosses where KHI was used as a parent (Table 2).<br />
Mass selection for field resistance to blast <strong>in</strong> early<br />
generations<br />
Surviv<strong>in</strong>g plants <strong>in</strong> the upland nursery were grown until maturity.<br />
S<strong>in</strong>ce it was hot and there was less ra<strong>in</strong>fall after the ra<strong>in</strong>y<br />
season <strong>in</strong> Japan, the development of blast lesions stopped. Test<br />
materials survived because of proper water management. About<br />
20–50% of the F 3 progenies of IW (susceptible to blast) and<br />
seven varieties with various resistance levels survived and<br />
achieved head<strong>in</strong>g from late August to early September. Some<br />
panicles were <strong>in</strong>jured by panicle blast and the cold, and did<br />
not mature until the cutt<strong>in</strong>g deadl<strong>in</strong>e (end of October).<br />
Crosses among susceptible varieties KHI/IW and KHO/<br />
IW are 20.3% and 20.8% of seeds sown <strong>in</strong>dividually, whereas<br />
crosses us<strong>in</strong>g resistant varieties TN/IW and KN/IW are 41.1%<br />
and 40.4% of seeds sown <strong>in</strong>dividually. Sterility because of<br />
panicle blast was observed <strong>in</strong> 6–11% of the F 3 progenies; sterility<br />
because of cool temperature and immaturity was rarely<br />
found except <strong>in</strong> KN (late-matur<strong>in</strong>g variety) used as a parent.<br />
42 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
Table 2. Disease rate (<strong>in</strong>dex) <strong>in</strong> upland nursery and heritability <strong>in</strong> F 3 l<strong>in</strong>es.<br />
Cross a<br />
Number of test<br />
Mean of disease rate<br />
Heritability b<br />
F 3 P 1 P 2 F 3 P 1 P 2 (h B2 )<br />
KN/TY 200 16 16 4.51 4.56 4.94 0.264<br />
TN/YS 200 16 16 4.73 4.38 5.50 0.107<br />
TN/HW 100 10 10 3.96 4.10 4.68 0.168<br />
TN/SN 200 16 16 5.15 3.81 5.63 0.424<br />
TN/IW 200 16 16 4.73 4.00 7.06 0.579<br />
KHI/TN 90 9 9 5.15 6.93 4.18 0.543<br />
KHO/TN 120 10 10 5.07 6.30 4.03 0.585<br />
KN/YS 200 16 16 4.11 4.31 4.50 0.264<br />
KN/HW 100 10 10 4.83 5.03 5.55 0.136<br />
KN/SN 100 10 10 4.81 4.80 5.87 0.548<br />
KN/IW 99 10 10 5.00 4.45 6.15 0.784<br />
KN/KHI 100 10 10 5.03 4.43 7.27 0.193<br />
KN/KHO 101 10 10 5.40 3.93 7.14 0.617<br />
HW/YS 99 10 10 3.86 4.85 3.85 0.309<br />
SN/YS 120 10 10 6.23 6.27 5.34 0.840<br />
IW/YS 200 12 12 4.81 7.00 3.42 0.522<br />
KHI/YS 100 10 10 5.01 8.17 3.87 0.136<br />
KHO/YS 120 12 12 5.08 6.58 4.50 0.314<br />
SN/HW 100 10 10 4.18 5.28 4.30 0.158<br />
IW/HW 100 10 10 5.23 6.33 4.83 0.579<br />
KHI/HW 100 10 10 6.08 7.93 5.27 0.481<br />
KHO/HW 120 12 12 5.90 6.92 4.69 0.433<br />
SN/IW 200 12 12 5.76 5.42 6.83 0.207<br />
KHI/SN 200 16 16 6.71 7.06 6.31 0.175<br />
KHO/SN 120 12 12 6.82 7.06 5.36 0.469<br />
KHI/IW 200 16 16 6.40 6.81 7.25 0.148<br />
KHO/IW 120 12 12 6.40 6.58 6.00 0.666<br />
KHI/KHO 120 12 12 6.82 7.06 5.36 0.469<br />
a TN = Toyonishiki, KN = Koganenishiki, YS = Yoneshiro, HW = Hownenwase, SN = Sasanishiki, IW =<br />
Inabawase, KHI = Koshihikari, KHO = Koshihomare. b h B<br />
2<br />
= (V F3 – (V P1 + V P2 )/2) × V F3 .<br />
Selection rates <strong>in</strong> ripen<strong>in</strong>g plants ranged from 13% to 40%<br />
(Table 3).<br />
One of seven crosses, IW/YS, was also selected by the<br />
same method (mass selection <strong>in</strong> the early generation by the<br />
ULS method) <strong>in</strong> the F 4 progenies. Almost no difference was<br />
observed between mass selection plots and control plots for<br />
F 5 l<strong>in</strong>es for culm length, panicle length, panicle number, gra<strong>in</strong><br />
quality, and other characters. S<strong>in</strong>ce ripen<strong>in</strong>g seeds by mass<br />
selection could not produce enough seeds for the blast-resistance<br />
test, F 6 l<strong>in</strong>es were tested by the ULS method. Many l<strong>in</strong>es<br />
resistant and moderately resistant to blast <strong>in</strong> the mass selection<br />
plots were observed (Fig. 1). About 25.3% of the F 6 l<strong>in</strong>es<br />
<strong>in</strong> the mass selection plots and 9.9% of the F 6 l<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong> the control<br />
were selected <strong>in</strong>dividually.<br />
Effects of blast resistance and eat<strong>in</strong>g quality <strong>in</strong><br />
advanced generation by mass selection<br />
For mass selection, a flooded nursery was established <strong>in</strong> a blastendemic<br />
location for easier water management and to produce<br />
enough seeds for the next generation. In the flooded nursery,<br />
disease rates of F 3 progenies of KHI/Shu 3810, KHI (P 1 ), Shu<br />
3810 (P 2 ), Todorokiwase (check, resistant), HW (check, moderate),<br />
and Ak<strong>in</strong>ishiki (check, susceptible) were 6, 8, 3, 2, 6,<br />
and 8, respectively. Ripen<strong>in</strong>g plants were selected for the next<br />
s<strong>in</strong>gle-plant selection. The selection rate for F 3 progenies of<br />
KHI/Shu 3810 was estimated to be 20.1%; 228 g of F 4 seeds<br />
were obta<strong>in</strong>ed from the 1.5-m 2 flooded nursery. This amount<br />
of F 4 seeds was enough for s<strong>in</strong>gle-plant selection and 3,300<br />
plants of the F 4 progenies were planted for s<strong>in</strong>gle-plant selection;<br />
169 plants were selected by stand observation (selection<br />
rate: 5.1%). Of these, 105 plants were selected for gra<strong>in</strong> quality<br />
(selection rate: 3.2%).<br />
Many l<strong>in</strong>es had long culms and the early head<strong>in</strong>g time of<br />
KHI <strong>in</strong> the F 5 progenies. Twenty-one l<strong>in</strong>es, based on stand<br />
observation and eat<strong>in</strong>g quality, were selected for short culm,<br />
lodg<strong>in</strong>g, degree of fixation, and other traits. Disease rates<br />
showed that many selected l<strong>in</strong>es are resistant or moderately<br />
resistant <strong>in</strong> the field. The eat<strong>in</strong>g quality of selected F 5 l<strong>in</strong>es<br />
showed that many selected l<strong>in</strong>es had very good taste (similar<br />
to that of KHI) or good taste (similar to that of Shu 3810).<br />
Thus, many l<strong>in</strong>es with resistance to blast also had very good<br />
taste.<br />
No new variety or Hokuriku Number L<strong>in</strong>e was selected<br />
<strong>in</strong> advanced l<strong>in</strong>es of Koshihikari/Shu 3810 because of lodg<strong>in</strong>g,<br />
yield<strong>in</strong>g ability, gra<strong>in</strong> size, and other traits, <strong>in</strong> spite of the<br />
short culm, resistance to blast, good appearance and quality,<br />
and good taste.<br />
<strong>Genetics</strong> and breed<strong>in</strong>g of agronomic traits 43
Table 3. Selection rate of mass selection for field resistance to rice<br />
blast <strong>in</strong> the upland nursery <strong>in</strong> the F 3 population.<br />
Sterile plants (%)<br />
Cross a Head<strong>in</strong>g Immature Selection<br />
plants Panicle Cool plants rate b<br />
(%) blast damage (%) (%)<br />
TN/IW 41.1 10.7 0.0 0.2 30.0<br />
KN/IW 40.4 10.3 8.9 8.2 13.0<br />
IW/YS 36.2 8.7 0.0 0.0 27.5<br />
IW/HW 49.4 8.4 0.0 0.4 40.5<br />
IW/SN 28.0 11.8 0.0 0.0 16.2<br />
KHI/IW 20.3 6.1 0.0 0.4 13.8<br />
KHO/IW 20.8 6.5 0.0 0.5 13.8<br />
a TN = Toyonishiki, KN = Koganenishiki, YS = Yoneshiro, HW = Hownenwase, SN =<br />
Sasanishiki, IW = Inabawase, KHI = Koshihikari, KHO = Koshihomare. b Selection<br />
rate (%) = ripen<strong>in</strong>g plants/sow<strong>in</strong>g seeds.<br />
Frequency (%)<br />
Inferior Eat<strong>in</strong>g qualityGood<br />
2.0<br />
1.5<br />
1.0<br />
0.5<br />
0.0<br />
Dontokoi<br />
Koshihikari<br />
Hitomebore<br />
3 4 5 6 7<br />
Disease rate of<br />
Resistant<br />
leaf blast<br />
Sensitive<br />
Figure 2. Disease rate of leaf blast and eat<strong>in</strong>g quality for selected<br />
F 5 l<strong>in</strong>es of several crosses us<strong>in</strong>g Dontokoi as a parent. = F 5 l<strong>in</strong>e,<br />
= parental and check variety.<br />
40<br />
30<br />
20<br />
Yoneshiro<br />
Mass selection plot<br />
Inabawase<br />
Control<br />
Dontokoi as a parent were resistant to blast and were very good<br />
tast<strong>in</strong>g (Fig. 2). Hokuriku 189 and Hokuriku 190 were released<br />
from these crosses <strong>in</strong> 2000, and a new variety, Itadaki, was<br />
released from another cross us<strong>in</strong>g Dontokoi as a parent.<br />
Breed<strong>in</strong>g of these varieties should <strong>in</strong>crease efficiency <strong>in</strong><br />
two steps. First, progenies of crosses are selected for blast resistance<br />
<strong>in</strong> an earlier generation. Second, progenies of crosses<br />
are selected for eat<strong>in</strong>g quality <strong>in</strong> an earlier generation, and many<br />
samples are tested at one time. The selection of the parent is<br />
very important <strong>in</strong> breed<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
10<br />
0<br />
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10<br />
Disease rate of leaf blast<br />
Figure 1. Frequency of disease rate <strong>in</strong> mass selection plot<br />
(F 6 l<strong>in</strong>es of Inabawase/Yoneshiro). F 4 population underwent<br />
mass selection for field resistance to rice blast <strong>in</strong> the upland<br />
nursery.<br />
= mean and variance of parental<br />
varieties.<br />
Eat<strong>in</strong>g quality and blast resistance of a s<strong>in</strong>gle<br />
pedigree us<strong>in</strong>g new variety Dontokoi as a parent<br />
Dontokoi was crossed to further improve eat<strong>in</strong>g quality and<br />
resistance to blast. Sixty-five l<strong>in</strong>es from these crosses were<br />
selected by stand observation (selection rate was 10.7%) and<br />
tested for eat<strong>in</strong>g quality. Many l<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong> these crosses us<strong>in</strong>g<br />
References<br />
Koga K, Uchiyamada H, Samoto S, Ishizaka S, Fujita Y, Okuno K,<br />
Uehara Y, Nakagahra M, Horiuchi H, Miura K, Maruyama K,<br />
Yamada T, Yagi T, Mori K. 1989. Breed<strong>in</strong>g a new rice cultivar,<br />
K<strong>in</strong>uhikara. Bull. Hokuriku Natl. Agric. Exp. Stn. 30:1-<br />
24.<br />
Uehara Y, Kobayashi A, Koga K, Uchiyamada H, Miura K, Fukui<br />
K, Shimizu H, Ohta H, Fujita Y, Okuno K, Ishizaka S, Horiuchi<br />
H, Nakagahra M. 1995. Breed<strong>in</strong>g a new rice cultivar, Dontokoi.<br />
Bull. Hokuriku Natl. Agric. Exp. Stn. 37:107-131.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ address: Hokuriku National Agricultural Experiment Station,<br />
Inada 1-2-1, Joetsu, Niigata 943-0193, Japan.<br />
44 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
Inheritance of resistance to bacterial blight <strong>in</strong> rice<br />
D. Sharma<br />
A highly virulent and prevalent pathotype, B-1, of Xanthomonas oryzae. pv. oryzae <strong>in</strong> the Balaghat rice region of<br />
Madhya Pradesh, India, has been identified. A set of 140 accessions was screened aga<strong>in</strong>st B-1 pathotype. The<br />
<strong>in</strong>heritance of resistance to this pathotype <strong>in</strong> 19 genotypes <strong>in</strong> the F 1<br />
, F 2<br />
, and F 3<br />
generations was studied. The<br />
resistance was governed by dom<strong>in</strong>ant genes <strong>in</strong> 14 genotypes, while two genotypes had one recessive gene and<br />
the other genotypes had two complementary dom<strong>in</strong>ant genes.<br />
Bacterial blight (BB), caused by Xanthomonas oryzae pv.<br />
oryzae (Ishiyama) Dye (Xoo), is one of the most important<br />
diseases of rice. The success of a resistance breed<strong>in</strong>g program<br />
lies <strong>in</strong> the identification of resistant donors specific to the prevalent<br />
pathogenic race(s) and their genetic analyses to identify<br />
different resistance genes. A highly virulent and prevalent<br />
pathotype of Xoo <strong>in</strong> the Balaghat rice region of Madhya Pradesh<br />
has been identified and designated as B-1 (Kumar et al 1999).<br />
We report the results on the genetic analysis of resistance to<br />
BB for the virulent B-1 pathotype.<br />
Materials and methods<br />
From the large collection of <strong>in</strong>digenous germplasm material<br />
of Indira Gandhi Agricultural University, Raipur (IGAU), 140<br />
accessions found to be resistant <strong>in</strong> a previous screen<strong>in</strong>g to a<br />
mixed <strong>in</strong>oculum were screened aga<strong>in</strong>st pathotype B-1 (Kumar<br />
et al 1999). N<strong>in</strong>eteen genotypes resistant to pathotype B-1 were<br />
crossed with the susceptible variety Taichung Native-1 (TN-<br />
1) to obta<strong>in</strong> F 1 , F 2 , and F 3 generations. Seven parents with a<br />
s<strong>in</strong>gle dom<strong>in</strong>ant resistance gene were crossed with each other<br />
to determ<strong>in</strong>e the allelic relationship. Four-meter-long s<strong>in</strong>gle<br />
rows of the F 1 s, 15 rows of F 2 s, and one row each of all F 2<br />
progenies were planted simultaneously under field conditions.<br />
The procedure used by Kumar et al (1994) was followed to<br />
prepare <strong>in</strong>oculum. Artificial <strong>in</strong>oculation was made us<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
method of Kauffman et al (1973). The <strong>IRRI</strong> (1988) Standard<br />
evaluation system for rice was followed to measure disease<br />
reaction. Data were processed us<strong>in</strong>g a standard statistical procedure.<br />
Results and discussion<br />
Out of 140 rice accessions found to be resistant to a mixed<br />
<strong>in</strong>oculum <strong>in</strong> an earlier study (Anonymous 1993), 42 were found<br />
to be resistant, 75 moderately resistant, 20 moderately susceptible,<br />
and 3 susceptible to pathotype B-1. This showed that the<br />
mixed <strong>in</strong>oculum used <strong>in</strong> the past screen<strong>in</strong>g did not conta<strong>in</strong><br />
pathotype B-1. These results also <strong>in</strong>dicate that accessions found<br />
to be resistant to the Xoo races are represented <strong>in</strong> the mixed<br />
<strong>in</strong>oculum and that they also had additional gene(s) with resistance<br />
to pathotype B-1.<br />
The <strong>in</strong>heritance of resistance to pathotype B-1 of Xoo <strong>in</strong><br />
19 resistant genotypes was studied <strong>in</strong> the F 1 , F 2 , and F 3 generations<br />
result<strong>in</strong>g from the hybridization with TN-1, the susceptible<br />
parent (Table 1). Results showed that resistance was<br />
controlled by a s<strong>in</strong>gle dom<strong>in</strong>ant gene <strong>in</strong> 14 genotypes, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Kotaki, Ramjira, Chhatri, Kubri Mohar, Assamchudi<br />
(A:680), Jhilli, Cross-116, Nirguni, Bogachudi, Pandri,<br />
Kanthichudi, Noni, Badshah Bhog, and Assamchudi (A:707);<br />
by a s<strong>in</strong>gle recessive gene <strong>in</strong> Khushipari Deshi and Kanakchudi;<br />
and by two complementary dom<strong>in</strong>ant genes <strong>in</strong> the parents<br />
Nagpuri Gurmatia and Ch<strong>in</strong>d Mori. However, two complementary<br />
dom<strong>in</strong>ant genes were found to control susceptibility <strong>in</strong><br />
the cross <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g one resistant parent, Kanak.<br />
Tests for allelism were carried out only <strong>in</strong> seven parents<br />
that possessed a dom<strong>in</strong>ant gene for resistance. Results (data<br />
not given) showed that Chhatri, Pandri, and Jhilli possessed<br />
different dom<strong>in</strong>ant genes for resistance. Jhilli, Bogachudi,<br />
Cross-116, Badshah Bhog, and Assamchudi (A:707) had the<br />
same dom<strong>in</strong>ant resistance gene.<br />
Conclusions<br />
The resistance to pathotype B-1 <strong>in</strong> rice genotypes was found<br />
to be simply <strong>in</strong>herited. The presence of different dom<strong>in</strong>ant<br />
genes for resistance <strong>in</strong> seven parents analyzed, coupled with<br />
varied genetic control of resistance <strong>in</strong> the other 12 resistant<br />
parents, <strong>in</strong>dicated the presence of considerable genetic diversity<br />
for resistance. These materials constitute valuable resources<br />
of genetic resistance to bacterial blight.<br />
References<br />
Anonymous. 1993. Annual report. Department of Plant Pathology.<br />
Raipur (India): Indira Gandhi Agricultural University. p 1-<br />
16.<br />
<strong>IRRI</strong> (<strong>International</strong> <strong>Rice</strong> Research Institute). 1988. Standard evaluation<br />
system for rice test<strong>in</strong>g programme (IRTP), rice manual.<br />
3rd ed. Manila (Philipp<strong>in</strong>es): <strong>IRRI</strong>. p 19.<br />
Kauffman HE, Reddy APK, Hsieh SPY, Merca SD. 1973. An improved<br />
technique for evaluat<strong>in</strong>g resistance of rice varieties to<br />
Xanthomonas oryzae. Plant Dis. Rep. 57(6):537-541.<br />
Kumar SM, S<strong>in</strong>gh HS, Sharma D. 1999. Survey of disease and pathogenic<br />
reaction of Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae <strong>in</strong> Balaghat<br />
region of M.P., India. Ann. Plant Prot. Sci. 7(1):91-119.<br />
<strong>Genetics</strong> and breed<strong>in</strong>g of agronomic traits 45
Table 1. Inheritance of resistance to bacterial leaf blight <strong>in</strong> 19 rice genotypes. a<br />
Reaction F 2 plant (no.) P value of F 3 families<br />
Cross of F 1 x 2 P value x 2 P value<br />
R S Total R:S R Seg. S Total R:S<br />
S<strong>in</strong>gle dom<strong>in</strong>ant gene for resistance<br />
TN1/Kotaki (K:1039) R 435 130 565 3:1 1.194 0.25–0.10 30 55 25 110 1:2:1 0.45 0.90–0.75<br />
TN1/Ramjira (R:397) R 220 66 286 3:1 0.564 0.50–0.25 23 50 27 100 1:2:1 0.32 0.90–0.75<br />
TN1/Chhatri (C:802) R 382 116 498 3:1 0.773 0.50–0.25 6 53 27 106 1:2:1 0.02 >0.99<br />
TN1/Kubri Mohar (K:1292) R 196 54 250 3:1 1.541 0.25–0.10 25 51 28 104 1:2:1 0.21 0.90–0.75<br />
TN1/Assamchudi (A:680) R 405 119 524 3:1 1.465 0.25–0.10 28 54 26 108 1:2:1 0.07 0.99–0.95<br />
TN1/Jhilli (J:126) R 430 128 558 3:1 1.264 0.25–0.10 25 56 30 111 1:2:1 0.45 0.90–0.75<br />
TN1/Cross-116 (C:615) R 398 114 512 3:1 2.040 0.25–0.10 21 44 26 91 1:2:1 0.65 0.75–0.50<br />
TN1/Nirguni (N:548) R 335 98 433 3:1 1.002 0.50–0.25 24 51 25 100 1:2:1 0.60 0.99–0.95<br />
TN1/Bogachudi (B:1345) R 440 129 569 3:1 1.645 0.25–0.10 26 54 22 102 1:2:1 0.67 0.75–0.50<br />
TN1/Pandri (P:409) R 450 135 585 3:1 1.153 0.25–0.10 27 58 26 111 1:2:1 0.24 0.90–0.75<br />
TN1/Kanthichudi (K:197) R 350 103 453 3:1 1.236 0.50–0.25 20 45 28 93 1:2:1 1.36 0.75–0.50<br />
TN1/Noni (N:717) R 401 124 525 3:1 0.533 0.50–0.25 21 52 23 96 1:2:1 0.75 0.75–0.50<br />
TN1/Badshah Bhog (B:214) R 297 105 402 3:1 0.268 0.75–0.50 24 44 28 96 1:2:1 1.00 0.75–0.50<br />
TN1/Assamchudi (A:707) R 258 88 346 3:1 0.034 0.90–0.75 29 48 30 107 1:2:1 1.15 0.50–0.25<br />
Detection of recessive resistance genes<br />
TN1/Khushipari Deshi S 102 294 396 1:3 0.121 0.75–0.50 24 53 27 104 1:2:1 0.21 0.90–0.75<br />
(K:100-I)<br />
TN1/Kanakchudi (K:49) S 98 338 436 1:3 1.480 0.25–0.10 23 52 25 100 1:2:1 0.24 0.90–0.75<br />
Detection of two complementary dom<strong>in</strong>ant genes<br />
TN1/Nagpuri Gurmatia R 262 226 448 9:7 1.300 0.50–0.25 10 60 40 110 1:8:7 2.80 0.25–0.10<br />
(N:473)<br />
TN1/Ch<strong>in</strong>d Mori (C:159) R 265 225 490 9:7 0.936 0.50–0.25 9 60 40 109 1:8:7 2.50 0.50–0.25<br />
Detection of two complementary dom<strong>in</strong>ant genes controll<strong>in</strong>g susceptibility<br />
TN1/Kanak (K:1381) S 206 306 512 7:9 2.571 0.25–0.10 45 66 10 121 7:8:1 2.48 0.50–0.25<br />
a R = resistant, S = susceptible, Seg. = segregat<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
Notes<br />
Author’s address: Department of Plant Breed<strong>in</strong>g and <strong>Genetics</strong>, Indira<br />
Gandhi Agricultural University, Raipur, Madhya Pradesh, India.<br />
Genetic analysis of resistance to bacterial blight <strong>in</strong> rice<br />
K.-S. Lee and G.S. Khush<br />
The mode of <strong>in</strong>heritance and allelic relationships of the genes for resistance to bacterial blight, caused by<br />
Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae, for 12 cultivars of rice was studied. The results showed that four cultivars have<br />
at least two recessive genes and one dom<strong>in</strong>ant gene for resistance. Seven cultivars have two recessive genes<br />
and one cultivar has one recessive and one dom<strong>in</strong>ant gene for resistance. The reaction of F 1<br />
and F 2<br />
populations<br />
from the crosses of 11 cultivars with xa5 revealed that all cultivars are allelic to xa5, while resistance <strong>in</strong> Sada<br />
diga is <strong>in</strong>herited <strong>in</strong>dependently of xa5. The additional dom<strong>in</strong>ant gene for resistance to race 1 <strong>in</strong> four cultivars with<br />
xa7 is under <strong>in</strong>vestigation. Similarly, the recessive genes for resistance to race 6 <strong>in</strong> 11 cultivars are nonallelic to<br />
xa13. The dom<strong>in</strong>ant gene for resistance to race 6 <strong>in</strong> Sada diga is <strong>in</strong>herited <strong>in</strong>dependently of xa13.<br />
Bacterial blight (BB) caused by Xanthomonas oryzae pv.<br />
oryzae (Xoo), which prevails ma<strong>in</strong>ly <strong>in</strong> the rice-grow<strong>in</strong>g countries<br />
of Asia, has also been reported to occur <strong>in</strong> Australia, the<br />
United States, Lat<strong>in</strong> America, and Africa. Gra<strong>in</strong> yield losses<br />
from bacterial blight <strong>in</strong> tropical and subtropical countries range<br />
from 10% to 60% depend<strong>in</strong>g on variety, severity of <strong>in</strong>fection,<br />
season, and time of <strong>in</strong>fection, but can reach 80% <strong>in</strong> highly<br />
susceptible varieties.<br />
46 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
Table 1. Reaction to race 1 of F 1 and F 2 populations from the crosses of the resistant<br />
cultivars with TN1.<br />
Reaction to race 1 of Xoo<br />
F 1<br />
Cross plants a F 2 population<br />
Resistant Susceptible Ratio X 2 P-value<br />
TN1/ARC 10376 S 68 166 1:3 2.057 0.10–0.25<br />
TN1/Kali Haitya S 225 65 13:3 2.555 0.10–0.25<br />
TN1/Kala Manik MR 193 62 13:3 0.985 0.25–0.50<br />
TN1/AC10-38 S 57 162 1:3 0.123 0.50–0.75<br />
TN1/Bazail 197 S 74 197 1:3 0.769 0.25–0.50<br />
TN1/Kalimekri 391 S 81 218 1:3 0.697 0.25–0.50<br />
TN1/ARC 10313 MR 242 64 13:3 0.942 0.25–0.50<br />
TN1/Raital S 67 175 1:3 0.931 0.25–0.50<br />
TN1/Aus 355 MR 206 56 13:3 1.184 0.25–0.50<br />
TN1/Laksmijota S 77 200 1:3 1.156 0.25–0.50<br />
TN1/Asw<strong>in</strong>a S 87 231 1:3 0.943 0.25–0.50<br />
TN1/Sada diga S 120 341 1:3 0.261 0.50–0.75<br />
a R = resistant, MR = moderately resistant, S = susceptible.<br />
The genetics of resistance to BB has been extensively<br />
<strong>in</strong>vestigated. Twenty-four major genes for BB resistance have<br />
been identified (L<strong>in</strong> et al 1996, Zhang et al 1998, Khush and<br />
Angeles 1999). Several of these genes have already been <strong>in</strong>corporated<br />
<strong>in</strong>to improved rice varieties that are now widely<br />
grown <strong>in</strong> many rice-grow<strong>in</strong>g countries. However, new races of<br />
the pathogen cont<strong>in</strong>ue to evolve that can overcome the resistance<br />
conveyed by major genes (Mew 1989). This study was<br />
conducted to analyze and identify the genes for resistance to<br />
bacterial blight.<br />
Materials and methods<br />
Twelve rice cultivars orig<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g from India and Bangladesh<br />
that were previously reported to be resistant to one or more<br />
Philipp<strong>in</strong>e races of Xoo were used. Varieties with resistance to<br />
six races of BB were classified to belong to a dist<strong>in</strong>ct group<br />
(Ogawa et al 1991). Two races of Xoo, race 1 (PXO61) and<br />
race 6 (PXO99), were employed <strong>in</strong> genetic analysis. Test varieties<br />
were crossed to a susceptible variety, TN1. They were<br />
also crossed to BB-resistant near-isogenic l<strong>in</strong>es, IRBB5 and<br />
IRBB13, for allele tests. IRBB5 has xa5, which confers resistance<br />
to races 1, 2, 3, and 5 and a moderate level of resistance<br />
to race 4. IRBB13 has xa13, which confers resistance to race<br />
6. The F 1 and F 2 progenies from the crosses of the test varieties<br />
with TN1 and two testers were evaluated for Xoo reaction<br />
by the <strong>in</strong>oculation method developed by Kauffman et al (1974).<br />
Results<br />
Table 1 lists the bacterial blight reactions to race 1 of 12 F 1<br />
and F 2 populations from the crosses of cultivars with TN1. F 1<br />
hybrids of four cultivars showed a dom<strong>in</strong>ant reaction and the<br />
F 2 populations of those hybrids segregated <strong>in</strong>to 13 resistant to<br />
3 susceptible. These results <strong>in</strong>dicate that a s<strong>in</strong>gle dom<strong>in</strong>ant<br />
gene and a recessive gene govern resistance to race 1 <strong>in</strong> these<br />
cultivars. F 1 hybrids of eight cultivars showed a susceptible<br />
reaction and F 2 populations of those hybrids segregated <strong>in</strong>to 1<br />
resistant to 3 susceptible. These results <strong>in</strong>dicate that a s<strong>in</strong>gle<br />
recessive gene governs resistance to race 1 <strong>in</strong> these cultivars.<br />
Table 2 shows the bacterial blight reaction to race 6 <strong>in</strong><br />
12 F 1 and F 2 populations from the crosses of cultivars with<br />
TN1. F 1 hybrids of 11 cultivars showed a susceptible reaction<br />
and the F 2 populations of those hybrids segregated <strong>in</strong>to 1 resistant<br />
to 3 susceptible, <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g that those cultivars have a<br />
s<strong>in</strong>gle recessive gene govern<strong>in</strong>g resistance to race 6. The F 1<br />
hybrid of Sada diga showed a dom<strong>in</strong>ant reaction and the F 2<br />
population segregated <strong>in</strong>to 3 resistant to 1 susceptible, <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g<br />
that Sada diga has a s<strong>in</strong>gle dom<strong>in</strong>ant gene govern<strong>in</strong>g resistance<br />
to race 6 of Xoo.<br />
The reactions to race 1 of F 1 hybrids and F 2 populations<br />
from the crosses of 12 cultivars with a near-isogenic l<strong>in</strong>e of<br />
IRBB5 were recorded. The F 1 hybrids from the crosses of<br />
IRBB5 carry<strong>in</strong>g xa5 with 11 cultivars were found to be resistant<br />
and the F 2 populations of these crosses did not segregate<br />
for susceptibility. These results <strong>in</strong>dicate that the s<strong>in</strong>gle recessive<br />
gene govern<strong>in</strong>g resistance to race 1 <strong>in</strong> these cultivars is<br />
allelic to xa5. The F 1 hybrid of Sada diga was susceptible and<br />
the F 2 population segregated <strong>in</strong>to 7 resistant to 9 susceptible,<br />
<strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g that a s<strong>in</strong>gle recessive gene govern<strong>in</strong>g resistance to<br />
race 1 <strong>in</strong> Sada diga is different from and segregated <strong>in</strong>dependently<br />
of xa5.<br />
Table 3 shows the reactions to race 6 of F 1 hybrids and<br />
F 2 populations from the crosses of 12 cultivars with IRBB13<br />
carry<strong>in</strong>g xa13. The F 1 hybrids of 11 cultivars were susceptible<br />
and the F 2 populations segregated <strong>in</strong>to 7 resistant to 9 susceptible.<br />
These results show that a s<strong>in</strong>gle recessive gene govern<strong>in</strong>g<br />
resistance to race 6 <strong>in</strong> 11 cultivars is nonallelic to xa13.<br />
The F 1 hybrid of Sada diga was resistant and the F 2 population<br />
segregated <strong>in</strong>to 13 resistant to 3 susceptible, <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g that a<br />
<strong>Genetics</strong> and breed<strong>in</strong>g of agronomic traits 47
Table 2. Reaction to race 6 of F 1 and F 2 populations from the crosses of the resistant<br />
cultivars with TN1.<br />
Reaction to race 1 of Xoo<br />
F 1<br />
Cross plants a F 2 population<br />
Resistant Susceptible Ratio X 2 P-value<br />
TN1/ARC 10376 S 70 164 1:3 3.015 0.05–0.10<br />
TN1/Kali Haitya MR 67 223 1:3 0.556 0.25–0.50<br />
TN1/Kala Manik S 72 173 1:3 2.526 0.10–0.25<br />
TN1/AC10-38 S 59 185 1:3 0.617 0.25–0.50<br />
TN1/Bazail 197 S 80 191 1:3 2.953 0.05–0.10<br />
TN1/Kalimekri 391 S 80 218 1:3 0.696 0.25–0.50<br />
TN1/ARC 10313 MS 75 213 1:3 0.039 0.75–0.90<br />
TN1/Raital S 64 177 1:3 0.446 0.50–0.75<br />
TN1/Aus 355 MS 72 190 1:3 0.855 0.25–0.50<br />
TN1/Laksmijota S 67 218 1:3 0.613 0.25–0.50<br />
TN1/Asw<strong>in</strong>a S 72 247 1:3 1.004 0.25–0.50<br />
TN1/Sada diga R 332 94 1:3 2.133 0.10–0.25<br />
a R = resistant, MR = moderately resistant, MS = moderately susceptible, S = susceptible.<br />
Table 3. Reaction to race 6 of F 1 and F 2 populations from the crosses of the<br />
resistant cultivars with IRBB13 (xa13).<br />
Reaction to race 1 of Xoo<br />
F 1<br />
Cross plants a F 2 population<br />
Resistant Susceptible Ratio X 2 P-value<br />
IRBB13/ARC 10376 S 150 181 7:9 0.331 0.50–0.75<br />
IRBB13/Kali Haitya S 191 232 7:9 0.339 0.50–0.75<br />
IRBB13/Kala Manik S 153 187 7:9 0.215 0.50–0.75<br />
IRBB13/AC10-38 S 176 216 7:9 0.210 0.50–0.75<br />
IRBB13/Bazail 197 S 156 206 7:9 0.063 0.75–0.90<br />
IRBB13/Kalimekri 391 S 151 204 7:9 0.213 0.50–0.75<br />
IRBB13/ARC 10313 S 165 244 7:9 1.930 0.10–0.25<br />
IRBB13/Raital S 126 174 7:9 0.373 0.50–0.75<br />
IRBB13Aus 355 S 120 171 7:9 0.747 0.25–0.50<br />
IRBB13/Laksmijota S 155 213 7:9 0.397 0.50–0.75<br />
IRBB13/Asw<strong>in</strong>a S 168 183 7:9 2.413 0.10–0.25<br />
IRBB13/Sada diga R 285 54 13:3 1.769 0.10–0.25<br />
a R = resistant, S = susceptible.<br />
s<strong>in</strong>gle dom<strong>in</strong>ant gene govern<strong>in</strong>g resistance to race 6 <strong>in</strong> Sada<br />
diga is different from and <strong>in</strong>herited <strong>in</strong>dependently of xa13.<br />
Discussion<br />
Genetic analysis showed that four cultivars out of 12 <strong>in</strong>vestigated<br />
had two recessive genes and one dom<strong>in</strong>ant gene govern<strong>in</strong>g<br />
resistance. Two of these genes confer resistance to race 1<br />
as a dom<strong>in</strong>ant and a recessive gene, and the other recessive<br />
gene confers resistance to race 6. Seven cultivars carried two<br />
recessive genes for resistance. These genes confer resistance<br />
to races 1 and 6. Cultivar Sada diga has a recessive gene that<br />
conveys resistance to race 1 and a dom<strong>in</strong>ant gene that conveys<br />
resistance to race 6.<br />
Allele tests showed that the recessive genes for resistance<br />
to race 1 <strong>in</strong> 11 cultivars are allelic to xa5. The recessive<br />
gene for resistance to race 1 <strong>in</strong> Sada diga is nonallelic to xa5.<br />
The allelic relationships of this gene with xa8, another recessive<br />
gene for resistance to race 1, are under <strong>in</strong>vestigation. The<br />
dom<strong>in</strong>ant gene for resistance to race 1 <strong>in</strong> four cultivars with<br />
xa7 is also under <strong>in</strong>vestigation.<br />
The recessive genes for resistance to race 6 <strong>in</strong> 11 cultivars<br />
are nonallelic to xa13. The allelic relationships of the recessive<br />
genes for resistance to race 6 <strong>in</strong> 11 cultivars with xa24(t)<br />
(Khush and Angeles 1999) need to be <strong>in</strong>vestigated. The dom<strong>in</strong>ant<br />
gene for resistance to race 6 <strong>in</strong> Sada diga is <strong>in</strong>herited<br />
<strong>in</strong>dependently of xa13. This variety needs to be tested with<br />
Xa21. We hope that the dom<strong>in</strong>ant gene <strong>in</strong> Sada diga will not<br />
be nonallelic to Xa21 and thus confer resistance to race 6.<br />
48 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
References<br />
Kauffman HE, Reddy APK, Hsieh SPY, Merca SD. 1974. An improved<br />
technique for evaluat<strong>in</strong>g resistance of rice varieties to<br />
Xanthomonas oryzae. Plant Dis. Rep. 57:537-541.<br />
Khush GS, Angeles ER. 1999. A new gene for resistance to race 6 of<br />
bacterial blight <strong>in</strong> rice, Oryza sativa L. <strong>Rice</strong> Genet. Newsl.<br />
16:92-93.<br />
L<strong>in</strong> XH, Zhang DP, Xie YF, Gao HP, Zhang Q. 1996. Identify<strong>in</strong>g<br />
and mapp<strong>in</strong>g a new gene for bacterial blight resistance <strong>in</strong> rice<br />
based on RFLP markers. Phytopathology 86:1156-1159.<br />
Mew TW. 1989. An overview of the world bacterial blight situation.<br />
In: Bacterial blight of rice. Los Baños (Philipp<strong>in</strong>es): <strong>International</strong><br />
<strong>Rice</strong> Research Institue. p 742.<br />
Ogawa T, Busto GA, Tabien RE, Romero GO, Endo N, Khush GS.<br />
1991. Group<strong>in</strong>g of rice cultivars based on reaction pattern to<br />
Philipp<strong>in</strong>e races of bacterial blight pathogen (Xanthomonas<br />
campestris pv. oryzae). Jpn. J. Breed. 41:109-119.<br />
Zhang I, L<strong>in</strong> SC, Zhao BY, Wang CL, Yang WC, Zhou YL, Li DY,<br />
Chen CB, Zhu LH. 1998. Identification and tagg<strong>in</strong>g of a new<br />
gene for resistance to bacterial blight (Xanthomonas oryzae<br />
pv. oryzae) from O. rufipogon. <strong>Rice</strong> Genet. Newsl. 15:138-<br />
142.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ addresses: K.-S. Lee, Kyehwa Substation, National Honam<br />
Agricultural Experiment Station, RDA, 579-820, Buan,<br />
Cheonbuk, Korea; G.S. Khush, <strong>International</strong> <strong>Rice</strong> Research<br />
Institute, Los Baños, Philipp<strong>in</strong>es.<br />
Breed<strong>in</strong>g bacterial blight–resistant rice cultivars<br />
at the Philipp<strong>in</strong>e <strong>Rice</strong> Research Institute<br />
R.E. Tabien and L.S. Sebastian<br />
At Phil<strong>Rice</strong>, known genes for bacterial blight (BB) resistance are be<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>corporated <strong>in</strong>to elite l<strong>in</strong>es and varieties.<br />
Both conventional and molecular marker-assisted procedures are be<strong>in</strong>g used to facilitate the development of a<br />
new rice variety with BB resistance. For a s<strong>in</strong>gle major gene, classical backcross<strong>in</strong>g is currently under way while,<br />
for gene comb<strong>in</strong>ations, marker-assisted selection is be<strong>in</strong>g practiced. Elite l<strong>in</strong>es from both methods hav<strong>in</strong>g a<br />
s<strong>in</strong>gle gene, such as xa5 or Xa21, and a comb<strong>in</strong>ation of xa5 and Xa21 have been developed and were entered<br />
<strong>in</strong> various yield trials. Yields were comparable with those of the recipient parent, but several l<strong>in</strong>es were highyield<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
L<strong>in</strong>es developed through marker-aided and classical backcross<strong>in</strong>g and selection have reta<strong>in</strong>ed morphological<br />
features of the recurrent parent. To pyramid several genes, crosses between and among promis<strong>in</strong>g l<strong>in</strong>es<br />
have been made to comb<strong>in</strong>e the three genes. Donors for tungro and blast resistance will be used later to<br />
<strong>in</strong>crease the spectrum of resistance of the l<strong>in</strong>es. The elite l<strong>in</strong>es are currently be<strong>in</strong>g evaluated <strong>in</strong> farmers’ fields <strong>in</strong><br />
a hot-spot area for BB <strong>in</strong> the country.<br />
Bacterial blight (BB) is one of the major diseases of rice <strong>in</strong> the<br />
Philipp<strong>in</strong>es. It can cause yield losses of 20–30% <strong>in</strong> severely<br />
affected fields (Ou 1985) and losses could reach 50–80% <strong>in</strong><br />
some cases. Eight genes have been found effective aga<strong>in</strong>st BB<br />
races <strong>in</strong> the Philipp<strong>in</strong>es (Endo et al 1992). Most of the rice<br />
varieties <strong>in</strong> the Philipp<strong>in</strong>es hav<strong>in</strong>g genes for BB resistance are<br />
effective aga<strong>in</strong>st only a few races of the pathogen. The Xa4<br />
and/or xa5 gene are not effective aga<strong>in</strong>st the predom<strong>in</strong>ant and<br />
virulent races <strong>in</strong> the country. New genes can be identified and<br />
used to m<strong>in</strong>imize loss from the disease. These genes can be<br />
deployed <strong>in</strong> time and by location, thus avoid<strong>in</strong>g or lessen<strong>in</strong>g<br />
the shift <strong>in</strong> population structure. Another way to delay resistance<br />
breakdown is gene stack<strong>in</strong>g, as genes can be comb<strong>in</strong>ed.<br />
Several reported genes have been mapped and close l<strong>in</strong>kage<br />
with DNA markers has been reported. Such markers can be<br />
used <strong>in</strong> backcross breed<strong>in</strong>g and gene pyramid<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
Reaction of PSB Rc (Philipp<strong>in</strong>e Seed Board rice)<br />
varieties to n<strong>in</strong>e races of BB<br />
Twenty-three PSB Rc varieties, IR24 (susceptible check), and<br />
IRBB 21 (resistant check) were evaluated for resistance to n<strong>in</strong>e<br />
races of BB. Seeds were sown <strong>in</strong> small plots <strong>in</strong>side the greenhouse<br />
and the seedl<strong>in</strong>gs were kept for 30 days before and after<br />
<strong>in</strong>oculation. At <strong>in</strong>oculation, seedl<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> rows were equally<br />
divided <strong>in</strong>to n<strong>in</strong>e sections, one for each race. The clipp<strong>in</strong>g<br />
method follow<strong>in</strong>g Kauffman et al (1973) was used at <strong>in</strong>oculation<br />
time. Inoculum was prepared from Xanthomonas oryzae<br />
pv. oryzae (Xoo) kept for 48 h and suspended at 10 7 –10 8 cells<br />
mL –1 . Evaluation was done 30 d after <strong>in</strong>oculation. Most of the<br />
Rc varieties were susceptible to races PXO86 and PXO79,<br />
but most had an <strong>in</strong>termediate to resistant reaction to PXO99,<br />
the most virulent race of BB. Only PSB Rc82 had a reaction<br />
similar to that of IRBB 21, the isol<strong>in</strong>e with the Xa21 gene.<br />
Some varieties had a differential reaction relative to known<br />
genes and thus could be new genes. Table 1 shows the reaction<br />
of the 23 PSB Rc varieties to n<strong>in</strong>e races of BB. Based on these<br />
<strong>Genetics</strong> and breed<strong>in</strong>g of agronomic traits 49
Table 1. Reaction of PSB Rc rice varieties to n<strong>in</strong>e races of bacterial blight (BB).<br />
Reaction to BB isolates<br />
PXO PXO PXO PXO PXO PXO PXO PXO PXO<br />
61 86 79 71 112 99 145 280 87<br />
IR24 b 47 26 34 37 21 26 20 5 –<br />
IRBB 21 c 5 5 3 5 6 6 5 6 6<br />
PSB Rc2 5 26 19 9 5 9 4 11 15<br />
PSB Rc4 10 20 20 12 8 4 3 14 12<br />
PSB Rc6 19 22 25 23 21 14 18 19 17<br />
PSB Rc8 21 22 27 19 11 19 11 17 17<br />
PSB Rc10 12 19 19 21 22 22 19 16 21<br />
PSB Rc18 10 20 19 15 6 7 7 12 14<br />
PSB Rc20 6 8 20 14 10 10 12 12 6<br />
PSB Rc22 7 11 12 12 7 11 18 18 10<br />
PSB Rc28 11 25 24 15 25 19 18 14 19<br />
PSB Rc30 17 33 28 17 9 11 8 9 9<br />
PSB Rc32 11 28 21 14 9 9 12 11 13<br />
PSB Rc34 5 25 21 9 4 7 9 10 8<br />
PSB Rc52 6 27 15 9 4 10 8 6 11<br />
PSB Rc54 6 25 17 15 12 10 12 13 8<br />
PSB Rc56 11 22 14 9 8 14 7 8 9<br />
PSB Rc58 8 9 13 15 5 6 11 4 8<br />
PSB Rc64 4 11 15 8 5 5 4 6 10<br />
PSB Rc66 6 14 15 6 6 5 6 6 7<br />
PSB Rc72H 19 28 24 21 7 13 4 4 14<br />
PSB Rc74 27 30 20 29 11 25 24 29 18<br />
PSB Rc78 8 18 18 6 5 5 4 5 7<br />
PSB Rc80 3 15 19 9 6 7 5 6 8<br />
PSB Rc82 5 6 8 14 5 5 4 7 5<br />
a Average of 3 uppermost leaves 10 plants –1 (lesion <strong>in</strong> cm). b Susceptible check. c Resistant check.<br />
reactions, crosses with IR24 were produced and some F 2 populations<br />
were developed.<br />
Transfer of the Xa21 gene to popular rice varieties and elite<br />
l<strong>in</strong>es<br />
Some of the most popular rice varieties <strong>in</strong> the Philipp<strong>in</strong>es have<br />
no resistance gene for BB. A new gene such as Xa21 was not<br />
available dur<strong>in</strong>g their development; thus, these varieties can<br />
be improved by <strong>in</strong>corporat<strong>in</strong>g a new trait or gene. IRBB 21,<br />
the donor of Xa21, was crossed to C4-63G, IR64, and BPI Ri-<br />
10, elite and popular varieties <strong>in</strong> the country. The materials<br />
were advanced through the F 2 -derived method. Elite l<strong>in</strong>es from<br />
the four crosses were evaluated <strong>in</strong> replicated trials for four<br />
seasons <strong>in</strong> a 6-row plot with 11 hills. Seedl<strong>in</strong>gs were transplanted<br />
21 days after sow<strong>in</strong>g us<strong>in</strong>g 20 × 20 cm plant spac<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
Based on phenotypic acceptability, several l<strong>in</strong>es were<br />
kept from the crosses. Dur<strong>in</strong>g the dry season of 1998, 14 l<strong>in</strong>es<br />
yielded at least 10 t ha –1 . Most of the high-yield<strong>in</strong>g l<strong>in</strong>es orig<strong>in</strong>ated<br />
from IR64. Across four seasons, l<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong> crosses <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g<br />
C4-63G had the highest average yield but most of the elite<br />
l<strong>in</strong>es were obta<strong>in</strong>ed from IR64 crosses (Table 2). C4-63G has<br />
been a popular parent <strong>in</strong> the cross<strong>in</strong>g program but plant breeders<br />
had difficulty <strong>in</strong> produc<strong>in</strong>g elite l<strong>in</strong>es (H. de la Cruz, personal<br />
communication). The same observation was noted from<br />
this cross. Most of the l<strong>in</strong>es were at the lower rank among the<br />
136 l<strong>in</strong>es evaluated. IR64 is a good donor for it produced the<br />
most elite l<strong>in</strong>es with high yield and good gra<strong>in</strong> quality. Some<br />
elite l<strong>in</strong>es are now <strong>in</strong> selected farmers’ fields.<br />
Marker-aided backcross<strong>in</strong>g and selection<br />
A s<strong>in</strong>gle gene can easily be transferred to a recipient but a<br />
comb<strong>in</strong>ation of genes effective aga<strong>in</strong>st a common race cannot<br />
be identified us<strong>in</strong>g classical <strong>in</strong>oculation. Through a series of<br />
backcross<strong>in</strong>g and DNA marker-aided selection, xa5 and Xa21<br />
were transferred to BPI Ri-10, IR64, and PSB Rc14. Markers<br />
associated with these genes were used to identify desired plants<br />
and the selected genotypes were evaluated us<strong>in</strong>g 10 RAPD<br />
primers. L<strong>in</strong>es with a genotype close to the recurrent parent<br />
and with the two genes were advanced and evaluated <strong>in</strong> yield<br />
trials.<br />
In the yield trial conducted dur<strong>in</strong>g the 2000 dry season,<br />
two l<strong>in</strong>es with IR64 background were advanced to the general<br />
yield test (Table 3). These l<strong>in</strong>es yielded 6.3 and 5.8 t ha –1 .<br />
From these crosses, BPI Ri-10-derived l<strong>in</strong>es had the most desirable<br />
phenotype and gra<strong>in</strong> quality. Although 17 loci from 10<br />
RAPD primers were used to select plants close to the recurrent<br />
parent, most of the progenies were similar to the parent. The<br />
markers used were effective <strong>in</strong> select<strong>in</strong>g l<strong>in</strong>es with pyramided<br />
genes. These l<strong>in</strong>es are now be<strong>in</strong>g evaluated <strong>in</strong> farmers’ fields<br />
like those with a s<strong>in</strong>gle gene.<br />
50 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
Table 2. Yield and some agronomic traits of six promis<strong>in</strong>g l<strong>in</strong>es developed by<br />
the classical transfer method of a s<strong>in</strong>gle gene for bacterial blight resistance.<br />
Parents L<strong>in</strong>e Yield Days to Height Kernel<br />
(kg ha –1 ) maturity (cm) quality<br />
C4-63G/IRBB 21 LI-4-221 7,024 121 117 Good<br />
IR64/IRBB 21 LI-62-241 6,919 123 108 Fair<br />
IRBB5/Rc4//TI 11-8 LI-5-16 6,847 122 116 Good<br />
IR64/IRBB 21 LI-62-260 6,845 116 111 Good<br />
IRBB21/IR64//TI 11-8 LI-21-271 6,802 115 101 Fair<br />
IR64/IRBB 21 LI-62-266 6,758 121 124 Fair<br />
Table 3. Yield performance of marker-aided derived l<strong>in</strong>es for bacterial blight resistance<br />
<strong>in</strong> the prelim<strong>in</strong>ary yield trial.<br />
Parents L<strong>in</strong>e Yield Days to Height Kernel<br />
(kg ha –1 ) maturity (cm) quality<br />
IR64//IRBB5-21/PSB Rc14 AR32-19-3-2 a 5,690 92 115 Excellent<br />
IR64//IRBB5-21/PSB Rc14 AR32-19-3-3 a 5,824 86 115 Good<br />
BPI Ri10/IRBB5-21 AR32-4-5-3 4,852 75 111 Excellent<br />
BPI Ri10/IRBB5-21 AR32-4-58-2 5,445 75 109 Fair<br />
IR64//IRBB5-21/PSB Rc14 AR32-19-3-4 a 6,341 89 113 Good<br />
Check IR72 5,775 84 119<br />
a Elevated to the general yield trial.<br />
L<strong>in</strong>es with pyramided BB genes will be crossed with the<br />
BB resistance gene <strong>in</strong>trogressed from Oryza m<strong>in</strong>uta <strong>in</strong> the same<br />
genetic background to comb<strong>in</strong>e the three genes. Progenies of<br />
these crosses will be crossed with donors hav<strong>in</strong>g blast and<br />
tungro resistance genes to comb<strong>in</strong>e genes for multiple pathogens.<br />
References<br />
Endo N, Ogawa T, Khush GS. 1992. Genetic analysis of Myanmar<br />
rice cultivars for resistance to bacterial blight. Jpn. J. Breed.<br />
42:341-352.<br />
Kauffman H, Reddy APK, Hsieh SPY, Merca SD. 1973. An improved<br />
technique for evaluat<strong>in</strong>g resistance of rice varieties to<br />
Xanthomonas oryzae. Plant Dis. Rep. 57:537-541.<br />
Ou SH. 1985. <strong>Rice</strong> diseases (revised edition). Kew, Surrey (England):<br />
Commonwealth Mycological Institute. p 61-68.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ address: Plant Breed<strong>in</strong>g and Biotechnology Division, Philipp<strong>in</strong>e<br />
<strong>Rice</strong> Research Institute, Maligaya, Muñoz 3119, Nueva<br />
Ecija, Philipp<strong>in</strong>es.<br />
Acknowledgments: The authors wish to thank the Asian <strong>Rice</strong> Biotechnology<br />
Network (ARBN) for fund<strong>in</strong>g the gene pyramid<strong>in</strong>g<br />
study, and M. Abalos, J. Casayuran, D. Tabanao, M. Padilla,<br />
and Y. Dimaano for their assistance <strong>in</strong> conduct<strong>in</strong>g the above<br />
studies.<br />
Inheritance and allelic relationships of rice gall<br />
midge resistance genes <strong>in</strong> some new donors<br />
Arv<strong>in</strong>d Kumar, M.N. Shrivastava, R.K. Sahu, B.C. Shukla, and S.K. Shrivastava<br />
The Asian rice gall midge, Orseolia oryzae Wood Mason (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae), is a major pest of rice <strong>in</strong><br />
several South and Southeast Asian countries. The maggots feed <strong>in</strong>ternally on the grow<strong>in</strong>g tips of the tillers and<br />
transform them <strong>in</strong>to tubular, onion-like structures called “silvershoots,” result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> severe yield loss to the rice<br />
crop. We studied the mode of <strong>in</strong>heritance and allelic relationships of resistance aga<strong>in</strong>st gall midge <strong>in</strong> four<br />
resistant donors—Abhaya, ARC 5984, RP2068-18-3-5, and RP2333-156-8. The segregation behavior of F 1<br />
,<br />
F 2<br />
, and F 3<br />
confirmed the presence of a s<strong>in</strong>gle dom<strong>in</strong>ant gene for resistance <strong>in</strong> Abhaya, ARC 5984, and RP2333-<br />
156-8 and a s<strong>in</strong>gle recessive gene for resistance <strong>in</strong> RP2068-18-3-5. Allelic relationship studies with known<br />
genes for resistance (Gm1, Gm2) and among themselves confirmed the presence of nonallelic genes for resis-<br />
<strong>Genetics</strong> and breed<strong>in</strong>g of agronomic traits 51
tance <strong>in</strong> Abhaya, ARC 5984, RP2068-18-3-5, and RP2333-156-8. The recessive gall midge resistance gene<br />
present <strong>in</strong> donor RP2068-18-3-5 could be designated as gm3. The dom<strong>in</strong>ant genes for gall midge resistance<br />
present <strong>in</strong> donors Abhaya, ARC 5984, and RP2333-156-8 can be designated as Gm4, Gm5, and Gm7, respectively.<br />
The Asian rice gall midge, Orseolia oryzae Wood Mason<br />
(Diptera: Cecidomyiidae), is a major pest of rice <strong>in</strong> several<br />
South and Southeast Asian countries, caus<strong>in</strong>g up to 100% yield<br />
losses under severe <strong>in</strong>festation (Tan et al 1993). The maggots<br />
feed <strong>in</strong>ternally on the grow<strong>in</strong>g tips of the tillers and transform<br />
them <strong>in</strong>to tubular, onion-like structures called “silvershoots.”<br />
Changes <strong>in</strong> the biotypic population have enabled this <strong>in</strong>sect to<br />
overcome host resistance. Systematic studies at Indira Gandhi<br />
Agricultural University <strong>in</strong> Raipur have led to the identification<br />
of two <strong>in</strong>dependent genes for gall midge resistance, Gm1<br />
and Gm2, present <strong>in</strong> cultivars Samridhi and Surekha, respectively<br />
(Chaudhary et al 1986). In this paper, we report on the<br />
identification of three <strong>in</strong>dependent new genes for gall midge<br />
resistance.<br />
Materials and methods<br />
Crosses were made between cultivars differ<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> gall midge<br />
resistance (Tables 1 and 2). Screen<strong>in</strong>g was done under natural<br />
conditions at the research farm of IGAU, Raipur, which is<br />
known to be a hot spot for gall midge occurrence. The test<br />
populations were flanked on both sides by purple-color highly<br />
susceptible l<strong>in</strong>e R 2270. Artificial light was provided at night<br />
from 1900 to 400 to attract midge adults to settle and oviposit<br />
on test plants. Fields were heavily fertilized with 150 kg N and<br />
80 kg P 2 O 5 ha –1 .<br />
F 1 plants of each cross were grown <strong>in</strong> s<strong>in</strong>gle rows. F 2<br />
populations were grown family-wise (as the product of a s<strong>in</strong>gle<br />
F 1 plant) <strong>in</strong> paired rows spaced 20 cm apart. From each F 2<br />
population, seed of 110 randomly selected plants was harvested<br />
to be advanced to F 3 . In the F 3 , each of the 110 l<strong>in</strong>es was sown<br />
as a s<strong>in</strong>gle l<strong>in</strong>e with 100 plants <strong>in</strong> each l<strong>in</strong>e. Observations were<br />
recorded when susceptible parents developed 100% <strong>in</strong>festation<br />
on a per plant basis. The presence of a s<strong>in</strong>gle silvershoot<br />
was taken as an <strong>in</strong>dex of susceptibility. The X 2 test was used<br />
to derive appropriate conclusions.<br />
Results and discussion<br />
Natural <strong>in</strong>festation of gall midge <strong>in</strong> wet seasons was very high.<br />
Cultivars Abhaya, ARC5984, RP2068-18-3-5, Samridhi, Asha,<br />
Ruchi, R302-111, Phalguna, and IET 6286 were found to be<br />
resistant, whereas Duokang I, Tulsi, Cheptigurmatia, Ratna,<br />
Shyamla, Kranti, Annada, and R2270 were susceptible to gall<br />
midge. All F 1 populations <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g Abhaya as one parent were<br />
found to be resistant (Table 1). The F 2 populations with parents<br />
possess<strong>in</strong>g Gm1 (Samridhi, Ruchi, and R 302-111) and<br />
Gm2 (Phalguna) genes gave a 15R:1S ratio. Abhaya was thus<br />
found to possess one dom<strong>in</strong>ant gene. The F 3 progenies of<br />
Abhaya with susceptible parents segregated <strong>in</strong>to a 1:2:1 ratio<br />
(Table 2). Similarly, progenies <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g Abhaya with resistant<br />
parents could be classified <strong>in</strong>to a 7:8:1 ratio as true resistance,<br />
segregat<strong>in</strong>g, and breed<strong>in</strong>g, respectively. The additional<br />
data on Abhaya crosses with ARC 5984 further confirmed the<br />
<strong>in</strong>dependent and dom<strong>in</strong>ant nature of the gene. This gene was<br />
therefore designated as Gm4.<br />
ARC 5984 gave a 3:1 ratio <strong>in</strong> the F 2 <strong>in</strong> crosses with Kranti<br />
and Shyamla (Table 1) and 15:1 with parents possess<strong>in</strong>g Gm1<br />
(Samridhi), Gm2 (Phalguna), and Gm4(t) (Abhaya) (Table 1).<br />
The gene present <strong>in</strong> ARC 5984 therefore appears to be a new<br />
gene. ARC 5984, which <strong>in</strong> earlier studies (Sahu et al 1990)<br />
was found to possess a recessive gene (designated as gm3)<br />
now <strong>in</strong>stead appears to have a dom<strong>in</strong>ant gene. This discrepancy<br />
appears to be due to the source of seed material used <strong>in</strong><br />
two studies. The F 2 population obta<strong>in</strong>ed from crosses of ARC<br />
5984 with RP 2068-18-3-5 segregated <strong>in</strong> a 13:3 ratio. The F 2<br />
population obta<strong>in</strong>ed from cross<strong>in</strong>g RP 2068-18-3-5 with RP<br />
2068-18-3-5 (previously labeled as ARC 5984) did not show<br />
any segregation (Table 2). Based on these data, the resistance<br />
gene present <strong>in</strong> ARC 5984 was designated as Gm5 (Kumar et<br />
al 1998). S<strong>in</strong>ce the gene of ARC 5984 has proved to be dom<strong>in</strong>ant<br />
and <strong>in</strong>dependent of all other hitherto known genes, it can<br />
be designated as Gm5.<br />
The F 1 population of RP 2068-18-3-5 with susceptible<br />
parent Annada showed a susceptible reaction, <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
presence of a recessive gene. The F 2 confirmed that a s<strong>in</strong>gle<br />
recessive gene governs resistance <strong>in</strong> RP 2068-18-3-5 (Table<br />
2). The crosses <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g RP 2068-18-3-5 and parents possess<strong>in</strong>g<br />
dom<strong>in</strong>ant genes for resistance—Gm1 (Samridhi, Asha,<br />
Ruchi), Gm2 (Phalguna, IET 6286) (Chaudhary et al 1986),<br />
and Gm4(t) (Abhaya) (Shrivastava et al 1993)—segregated<br />
<strong>in</strong>to 13:3 <strong>in</strong> the F 2 and 7:8:1 <strong>in</strong> the F 3 generation (Table 2).<br />
This clearly <strong>in</strong>dicated that the recessive gene present <strong>in</strong><br />
RP2068-18-3-5 is nonallelic to Gm1, Gm2, and Gm4 and segregates<br />
<strong>in</strong>dependently. The recessive gene present <strong>in</strong> RP 2068-<br />
18-3-5 is nonallelic to the new dom<strong>in</strong>ant gene Gm5 identified<br />
<strong>in</strong> ARC 5984. Therefore, the recessive gene for resistance<br />
present <strong>in</strong> RP 2068-18-3-5 is tentatively designated as gm3.<br />
All F 1 populations <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g RP2333-156-8 as one parent<br />
were found to be resistant (Table 2). The three F 2 populations<br />
<strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g RP 2333-156-8 and the susceptible parents R<br />
2270, Ratna, and Shymala segregated <strong>in</strong>to 3:1, <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
presence of a s<strong>in</strong>gle dom<strong>in</strong>ant resistance gene <strong>in</strong> RP2333-156-<br />
8. The F 3 progenies segregated <strong>in</strong>to a 1:2:1 ratio, confirm<strong>in</strong>g<br />
the F 2 segregation data. The F 2 populations of RP 2333-156-8<br />
with parents possess<strong>in</strong>g Gm1 (Samridhi, Ruchi, and Asha),<br />
Gm2 (Phalguna), RP2068-18-3-5, Gm4(t) (Abhaya), and ARC<br />
5984 genes segregated <strong>in</strong>to a 15:1 ratio, <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g the nonallelic<br />
nature of the gene present <strong>in</strong> RP 2333-156-8, RP2068-<br />
18-3-5, Gm4(t) (Abhaya), and ARC 5984 gall midge resis-<br />
52 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
Table 1. Reaction of F 1 , F 2 , and F 3 populations of Abhaya and ARC 5984 with<br />
susceptible and resistant cultivars. a<br />
Cross<br />
Reaction of F 2 plants (no.)<br />
F 1 R S Ratio X 2<br />
Abhaya × Tulsi R 584 191 3:1 0.052<br />
Abhaya × Annada R 375 104 3:1 2.762<br />
Abhaya × Cheptigurmatia R 411 117 3:1 2.273<br />
Abhaya × Ratna R 449 150 3:1 0.001<br />
Abhaya × Samridhi R 581 33 15:1 0.810<br />
Abhaya × Ruchi R 621 39 15:1 0.931<br />
Abhaya × R302-111 R 753 50 15:1 0.001<br />
Abhaya × Phalguna R 510 36 15:1 0.110<br />
ARC 5984 × Kranti R 246 73 3:1 0.762<br />
ARC 5984 × Shyamla R 359 123 3:1 0.069<br />
ARC 5984 × Samridhi R 361 19 15:1 1.013<br />
ARC 5984 × Phalguna R 92 6 15:1 0.003<br />
Abhaya × ARC 5984 R 184 12 15:1 0.001<br />
ARC 5984 × RP2068-18-3-5 R 250 72 13:3 2.755<br />
ARC 5984 × ARC 5984 (old) R 450 116 13:3 1.131<br />
RP2068-18-3-5 × ARC 5984 (old) R 391 – – –<br />
a R = resistant, S = susceptible.<br />
Table 2. Reaction of F 1 , F 2 , and F 3 populations of RP2068-18-3-5 and RP2333-<br />
156-8 with susceptible and resistant cultivars. a<br />
Reaction of F 2 plants (no.)<br />
Cross Reaction<br />
of F 1 R S Ratio X 2<br />
RP 2068-18-3-5/Annada S 75 198 1:3 0.890<br />
RP 2068-18-3-5/Samridhi R 489 95 13:3 2.363<br />
RP 2068-18-3-5/Asha R 255 72 13:3 2.293<br />
RP 2068-18-3-5/Ruchi R 222 58 13:3 0.709<br />
RP 2068-18-3-5/Phalguna R 168 32 13:3 0.993<br />
RP 2068-18-3-5/IET6286 R 57 16 13:3 0.762<br />
RP 2068-18-3-5/Abhaya R 482 98 13:3 1.308<br />
ARC 5984/RP 2068-18-3-5 R 250 72 13:3 2.755<br />
RP 2333 × Shyamla R 312 98 3:1 0.263<br />
RP 2333 × R 2270 R 209 84 3:1 2.103<br />
RP 2333 × Ratna R 273 104 3:1 1.345<br />
RP 2333 × Samridhi R 338 27 15:1 0.819<br />
RP 2333 × Ruchi R 175 14 15:1 0.432<br />
RP 2333 × Asha R 1,139 72 15:1 0.192<br />
RP2333 × Phalguna R 614 48 15:1 1.131<br />
RP 2333 × RP 2068-18-3-5 R 390 74 13:3 1.894<br />
RP 2333 × Abhaya R 541 32 15:1 0.433<br />
RP 2333 × ARC 5984 R 454 26 15:1 0.302<br />
a R = resistant, S = susceptible.<br />
tance genes. The reaction of F 3 families also confirmed the<br />
nonallelic nature of the gene present <strong>in</strong> RP 2333-156-8 with<br />
Gm1, Gm2, RP2068-18-3-5, Gm4(t) (Abhaya), and ARC 5984<br />
gall midge resistance genes. The Gm6 gall midge resistance<br />
gene identified <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>ese variety Duokang 1 (Yang et al 1997)<br />
was found to be susceptible aga<strong>in</strong>st gall midge biotype 1 prevalent<br />
<strong>in</strong> Madhya Pradesh. Therefore, the gene present <strong>in</strong> RP<br />
2333-156-8 is a new gall midge resistance gene and is proposed<br />
to be designated as Gm7.<br />
References<br />
Chaudhary BP, Shrivastava PS, Shrivastava MN, Khush, GS. 1986.<br />
Inheritance of resistance to gall midge <strong>in</strong> some cultivars of<br />
rice. <strong>Rice</strong> genetics. Manila (Philipp<strong>in</strong>es): <strong>International</strong> <strong>Rice</strong><br />
Research Institute. p 523-528.<br />
Kumar Arv<strong>in</strong>d, Shrivastava MN, Sahu RK 1998. Genetic analysis<br />
of ARC 5984 for gall midge resistance: a reconsideration. <strong>Rice</strong><br />
Genet. Newsl. 15:142-143.<br />
<strong>Genetics</strong> and breed<strong>in</strong>g of agronomic traits 53
Sahu VN, Mishra R, Chaudhary BP, Shrivastava PS, Shrivastava<br />
MN. 1990. Inheritance of resistance to gall midge <strong>in</strong> rice. <strong>Rice</strong><br />
Genet. Newsl. 7:118-121.<br />
Shrivastava MN, Kumar Arv<strong>in</strong>d, Shrivastava SK, Sahu RK. 1993.<br />
A new gene for resistance to gall midge <strong>in</strong> rice variety Abhaya.<br />
<strong>Rice</strong> Genet. Newsl. 10:79-80.<br />
Tan Yujuan, Pan Y<strong>in</strong>g, Zhang Yang. 1993. Resistance to gall midge<br />
(GM) Orseolia oryzae <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>ese rice varieties compared with<br />
varieties from other countries. Int. <strong>Rice</strong> Res. Notes 18:13.<br />
Yang Zhang, Yujuan Tan, B<strong>in</strong>gchao Huang, Jianwei Chen, Lixia<br />
Zhao, Yankang Xu.1997. The <strong>in</strong>heritance of resistance to gall<br />
midge <strong>in</strong> rice variety Duokang 1. <strong>Rice</strong> Genet. Newsl. 14:67-<br />
69.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ addresses: A. Kumar, Indira Gandhi Agricultural University,<br />
Regional Agricultural Research Station,Bilaspur 495 001,<br />
Madhya Pradesh, India; M.N. Shrivastava, R.K. Sahu, and<br />
B.C. Shukla, Department of Plant Breed<strong>in</strong>g and <strong>Genetics</strong>,<br />
Indira Gandhi Agricultural University, Raipur 492 012,<br />
Madhya Pradesh, India; S.K. Shrivastava, Department of Entomology,<br />
Indira Gandhi Agricultural University, Raipur 492<br />
012, Madhya Pradesh, India.<br />
Acknowledgments: This study was supported by Indira Gandhi Agricultural<br />
University, Raipur, India, and the Rockefeller Foundation,<br />
USA.<br />
<strong>Genetics</strong> of submergence tolerance <strong>in</strong> ra<strong>in</strong>fed rice:<br />
l<strong>in</strong>e × tester analysis<br />
O.N. S<strong>in</strong>gh, Sanjay S<strong>in</strong>gh, R.K. S<strong>in</strong>gh, and S. Sarkarung<br />
A study was conducted with three submergence-tolerant (TCA-48, FRG-7, Madhukar) and two susceptible genotypes<br />
(Mahsuri and IR42) used as testers, and n<strong>in</strong>e l<strong>in</strong>es consist<strong>in</strong>g of six submergence-tolerant improved<br />
selections and three released varieties—Jal-Lahri (moderately tolerant), Rajshree (susceptible), and Sabita<br />
(tolerant). The 45 F 1<br />
s derived from 5 × 9 l<strong>in</strong>e-tester crosses and 14 parents were direct-sown. Twenty-one-dayold<br />
seedl<strong>in</strong>gs were submerged for 14 days under 80-cm water depth. The water was allowed to recede and, on<br />
the third day and tenth day of desubmergence, plant height was measured, a survival count made, and elongation<br />
computed. Dur<strong>in</strong>g the wet season of 1999, the F 2<br />
s along with their parents were direct-sown and a similar<br />
submergence test was performed. On the basis of phenotypic scores on F 1<br />
s and parents, statistical analysis was<br />
performed. L<strong>in</strong>e × tester analysis was carried out and general and specific comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g ability of the parents and<br />
their crosses were determ<strong>in</strong>ed. Various types of gene effects were also estimated. Analysis of data suggested<br />
significant variation among l<strong>in</strong>es, testers, crosses, parents vs crosses, and l<strong>in</strong>e × tester <strong>in</strong>teraction. Among<br />
tolerant parents (testers), only TCA 48 was found to be a good general comb<strong>in</strong>er, whereas Madhukar and FRG-<br />
7 were poor comb<strong>in</strong>ers. Crosses <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g tolerant × tolerant, tolerant × susceptible, susceptible × susceptible,<br />
and moderately tolerant × susceptible behaved differently for submergence tolerance. Results and their implications<br />
for breed<strong>in</strong>g ra<strong>in</strong>fed lowland rice are discussed.<br />
Ra<strong>in</strong>fed lowlands account for about 25 million ha of rice area<br />
<strong>in</strong> South and Southeast Asia. India has the largest area, about<br />
17 million ha, mostly distributed <strong>in</strong> eastern India. Submergence<br />
caused by flash flood is a key factor limit<strong>in</strong>g the yield<br />
of lowland rice. Flash floods are highly unpredictable and can<br />
occur at any growth stage of the rice crop, result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> yield<br />
loss of 10% to 100% depend<strong>in</strong>g on water depth, duration of<br />
submergence, temperature, turbidity of water, light <strong>in</strong>tensity,<br />
and age of the crop, etc. (Setter et al 1997). A few studies <strong>in</strong><br />
the past reported dom<strong>in</strong>ance of tolerance over nontolerance<br />
and <strong>in</strong>volvement of both major and m<strong>in</strong>or genes <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>heritance<br />
(Mohanty and Khush 1985, Mohanty et al 2000). Mandal<br />
et al (1998) found both additive and nonadditive gene effects<br />
responsible for <strong>in</strong>heritance of submergence tolerance, the<br />
former be<strong>in</strong>g predom<strong>in</strong>ant. We studied the nature and magnitude<br />
of genetic variation of submergence tolerance.<br />
Materials and methods<br />
For 9 × 5 l<strong>in</strong>e × tester analysis, three submergence-tolerant<br />
genotypes (TCA48, FRG7, Madhukar) and two susceptible<br />
genotypes (Mahsuri and IR42) were used as testers, besides<br />
six submergence-tolerant improved selections from the shuttle<br />
breed<strong>in</strong>g project and three released varieties—Jal-Lahri (moderately<br />
tolerant), Rajshree (susceptible), and Sabita (tolerant).<br />
Of the two susceptible testers, Mahsuri is tall and IR42 is an<br />
improved semidwarf variety. Of the n<strong>in</strong>e l<strong>in</strong>es, six are improved<br />
semidwarf selections, two are semidwarf (Jal-Lahri and<br />
Rajshree), and one is a tall improved variety (Sabita). The 45<br />
F 1 s derived from 9 × 5 l<strong>in</strong>e × tester crosses and 14 parents<br />
were direct-sown each <strong>in</strong> one row 4 m long, with three replications<br />
and row-to-row spac<strong>in</strong>g of 30 cm and plant-to-plant spac<strong>in</strong>g<br />
of 20 cm. When the seedl<strong>in</strong>gs were 21 days old, the number<br />
of plants/genotypes was counted and the seedl<strong>in</strong>gs were<br />
subsequently submerged for 14 days under 80-cm water depth.<br />
The water was then allowed to recede and, on the tenth day of<br />
54 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
Table 1. Mean parental score and their array means for submergence tolerance <strong>in</strong> a 9 × 5 l<strong>in</strong>e × tester cross.<br />
L<strong>in</strong>es NDRSB NDRSB NDRSB NDRSB NDRSB NDRSB Jal Lahri Rajshree Sabita Array<br />
96004 96005 96006 930004 9730015 9730020 mean<br />
Testers 2.86 2.32 2.07 3.42 3.87 4.16 5.82 5.98 3.16 –<br />
TCA 48 1.78 1.87 2.52 2.47 2.60 1.66 3.22 2.66 3.87 1.87 2.56<br />
FRG 7 2.04 4.16 3.87 2.92 3.42 4.32 4.04 3.84 4.32 1.56 3.61<br />
Madhukar 2.86 2.06 1.96 2.14 3.27 4.16 4.04 4.15 2.08 1.93 2.87<br />
Mahsuri 8.64 5.68 6.14 3.24 2.86 5.85 6.62 7.84 7.32 5.38 5.66<br />
IR42 8.93 8.01 4.32 5.01 3.47 6.85 6.42 7.85 7.37 4.67 6.55<br />
Array mean 4.36 4.36 3.56 3.12 4.57 4.87 5.27 4.39 3.10 R = 0.62<br />
Table 2. General comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g ability (GCA) and specific comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g ability (Sij) effects <strong>in</strong> a 9 × 5 l<strong>in</strong>e × tester cross <strong>in</strong> rice. a<br />
L<strong>in</strong>es NDRSB NDRSB NDRSB NDRSB NDRSB NDRSB Jal Lahri Rajshree Sabita GCA<br />
96004 96005 96006 9730004 9730015 9730020 (L 7 ) (L 8 ) (L 9 ) (testers)<br />
Testers (L 1 ) (L 2 ) (L 3 ) (L 4 ) (L 5 ) (L 6 )<br />
TCA 48 –1.822** –1.382** 1.649** 1.432** –1.211** –0.624* –0.521* –0.628* 0.856* –1.422**<br />
(T 1 )<br />
FRG 7 –1.469** 1.382** 0.011 –0.067 0.100 1.522** –0.785* –0.102 0.132 –1.163**<br />
(T 2 )<br />
Madhukar 0.856* –0.867* –1.278** 0.523* 0.049 0.273 0.123 1.678** –1.342** 0.408*<br />
(T 3 )<br />
Mahsuri 1.326** 1.537** 0.237 0.056 0.132 2.253** 1.427** 0.306 0.432* 1.522**<br />
(T 4 )<br />
IR42 0.527* 0.136 1.465** 0.047 0.532* 0.976* 1.653** 0.017 2.324** 0.781*<br />
(T 5 )<br />
GCA 0.386* –1.264** –1.621** 2.542** 0.976* 0.743* 0.658* 0.776* 1.128**r(s) = 0.80<br />
(l<strong>in</strong>es)<br />
a r(s) = rank correlation between the per se performance of the parents and their GCA effects. *, ** = significant at 5% and 1% probability level.<br />
desubmergence, a survival count was made. Dur<strong>in</strong>g the wet<br />
season of 1999, the selected F 2 s along with their parents were<br />
direct-sown and a similar submergence test was performed.<br />
On the basis of phenotypic scores on F 1 s and parents, l<strong>in</strong>e ×<br />
tester analysis was performed follow<strong>in</strong>g Kempthorne (1957).<br />
Results and discussion<br />
Among testers, TCA 48, FRG 7, and Madhukar were the most<br />
tolerant, and among l<strong>in</strong>es, NDRSB96006, NDRSB96005, and<br />
NDRSB96004 were found to be the most tolerant (Table 1).<br />
Rajshree was found to be the most susceptible. The scores for<br />
F 1 s differed greatly from one cross to another depend<strong>in</strong>g on<br />
the level of tolerance of the parents used <strong>in</strong> the cross. A high<br />
relationship between parental means and their array means (r<br />
= 0.62) suggests a high prepotency of the parents <strong>in</strong> transmitt<strong>in</strong>g<br />
submergence tolerance to their offspr<strong>in</strong>g. Mohanty and<br />
Khush (1985) also reported a high correlation (0.88) between<br />
the parental means and their array means. ANOVA <strong>in</strong>dicated<br />
highly significant variances for all the treatments. The significance<br />
of l<strong>in</strong>e × tester showed a high <strong>in</strong>teraction. Similarly, the<br />
performance of the crosses differed significantly from that of<br />
the parents, with the testers show<strong>in</strong>g a larger variation than the<br />
l<strong>in</strong>es.<br />
FRG 7 and TCA 48 appeared to be the best comb<strong>in</strong>ers,<br />
while Mahsuri was the poorest (Table 2). Among l<strong>in</strong>es,<br />
NDRSB96005 and NDRSB 96006 proved to be the best general<br />
comb<strong>in</strong>ers. TCA 48, when crossed with NDRSB96004<br />
and NDRSB96005, produced the best cross comb<strong>in</strong>ations. The<br />
other good comb<strong>in</strong>ations <strong>in</strong>cluded the cross between<br />
NDRSB96004 and NDRSB96005 and Madhukar.<br />
Out of five crosses between the most susceptible and<br />
most tolerant l<strong>in</strong>es, four showed a clear-cut 3:1 ratio, <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>in</strong>volvement of a s<strong>in</strong>gle locus (Table 3). However, the cross<br />
NDRSB6006 × IR42 did not fit <strong>in</strong>to this ratio. This clearly<br />
shows that tolerant parents such as Sabita, NDRSB96005, and<br />
NDRSB 96006 possessed the dom<strong>in</strong>ant gene, while IR42 and<br />
Mahsuri possessed the recessive gene for susceptibility to submergence.<br />
Mohanty and Khush (1985) also reported the dom<strong>in</strong>ance<br />
of tolerance over nontolerance. Similar observations<br />
were made by Mandal et al (1998). The survival of the tolerant<br />
parent ranged from 87% to 92% vis-à-vis 6% for IR42 and<br />
11% for Mahsuri.<br />
A high level of rank correlation (r = 0.8) was observed<br />
between the per se performance of the parents and their general<br />
comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g ability. From the study, it is clear that, besides<br />
well-known submergence-tolerant parents such as TCA 98 and<br />
FRG 7, the newly developed semidwarf l<strong>in</strong>es—NDRSB96004,<br />
NDRSB96005, and NDRSB96006—could also be good candidates<br />
for breed<strong>in</strong>g submergence-tolerant varieties. It will be<br />
worthwhile to explore whether these l<strong>in</strong>es had the same gene.<br />
Such <strong>in</strong>formation will be useful <strong>in</strong> gene pyramid<strong>in</strong>g for a higher<br />
<strong>Genetics</strong> and breed<strong>in</strong>g of agronomic traits 55
Table 3. Reaction of tolerant and susceptible progenies to submergence tested <strong>in</strong><br />
the field.<br />
F 2 population Tolerant Susceptible Expected ratio χ 2 Probability<br />
(tolerant:susceptible)<br />
Sabita/IR42 118 43 3:1 0.911 0.25–0.25<br />
Sabita/Mahsuri 111 34 3:1 1.628 0.10–0.25<br />
NDRSB96005/IR42 144 52 3:1 0.517 0.50–0.75<br />
NDRSB96006/IR42 108 27 4:1 – –<br />
NDRSB96006/Mahsuri 151 47 3:1 2.154 0.10–0.15<br />
level of submergence tolerance. Submergence-tolerant cultivars<br />
such as FR13A, Kurukamppan, and BKNFR have been<br />
reported to possess the same dom<strong>in</strong>ant gene (Mishra et al 1996,<br />
Setter et al 1997).<br />
L<strong>in</strong>e × tester analysis helped to identify a few l<strong>in</strong>es<br />
(NDRSB96005, NDRSB96004, NDRSB96006) that were tolerant<br />
and also good comb<strong>in</strong>ers for submergence. They made<br />
good comb<strong>in</strong>ation among themselves as well as with the known<br />
tolerant varieties TCA 98, FRG 7, and Madhukar. The segregation<br />
pattern of F 2 data showed a 3 tolerant:1 susceptible ratio,<br />
confirm<strong>in</strong>g monogenic <strong>in</strong>heritance of the trait.<br />
Mishra SB, Senadhira D, Manigbas NL. 1996. <strong>Genetics</strong> of submergence<br />
tolerance <strong>in</strong> rice (Oryza sativa L). Field Crops Res. 46:<br />
77-182.<br />
Mohanty HK, Khush GS. 1985. Diallel analysis of submergence tolerance<br />
<strong>in</strong> rice, Oryza sativa L. Theor. Appl. Genet. 70:467-<br />
473.<br />
Mohanty HK, Mallik S, Grover Anil. 2000. Prospects of improv<strong>in</strong>g<br />
flood<strong>in</strong>g tolerance <strong>in</strong> lowland rice varieties by conventional<br />
breed<strong>in</strong>g and genetic eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g. Curr. Sci. 78(2):132-137.<br />
Setter L, Ellis M, Laurels EV, Ella ES, Senadhira D, Mishra SB,<br />
Sarkarung S, Datta S. 1997. Physiology and genetics of submergence<br />
tolerance <strong>in</strong> rice. Ann. Bot. 79:67-77.<br />
References<br />
Kempthorne O. 1957. An <strong>in</strong>troduction to genetic statistics. New York<br />
(USA): John Wiley and Sons, Inc., and London (UK):<br />
Chapman and Hall, Ltd.<br />
Mandal N, Roy K, Gupta S. 1998. Nature of genetic control of submergence<br />
tolerance <strong>in</strong> rice. Indian J. Genet. Plant Breed.<br />
58:285-290.<br />
Diallel analysis for cold tolerance<br />
at the germ<strong>in</strong>ation stage <strong>in</strong> rice<br />
R.P. dela Cruz, S.C.K. Milach, L.C. Federizzi, A.F. de Rosso<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ addresses: O.N. S<strong>in</strong>gh, Crop Research Station, Masodha,<br />
P.O. Dabhasemar, Faizabad, Uttar Pradesh; R.K. S<strong>in</strong>gh, <strong>IRRI</strong>-<br />
India Office, C-18, Friends Colony (East), New Delhi 110<br />
065, India; Sanjay S<strong>in</strong>gh and S. Sarkarung, <strong>IRRI</strong>, Los Baños,<br />
Philipp<strong>in</strong>es.<br />
In Rio Grande do Sul <strong>in</strong> southern Brazil, temperatures below 20 °C affect the rice crop dur<strong>in</strong>g plant establishment<br />
and <strong>in</strong>itial development, and dur<strong>in</strong>g microsporogenesis and flower<strong>in</strong>g. Three cold-tolerant and three cold-sensitive<br />
genotypes were crossed <strong>in</strong> a diallel exclud<strong>in</strong>g reciprocals. Seeds were <strong>in</strong>cubated under two conditions: 13 °C<br />
for 28 d and 28 °C for 7 d; after these periods, coleoptile length was measured. Cold tolerance was expressed<br />
as a percentage reduction <strong>in</strong> coleoptile length because of cold compared with normal conditions. The comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />
ability analysis showed highly significant effects because of general comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g ability (GCA) and specific comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />
ability (SCA) for cold tolerance <strong>in</strong> the genotypes studied. The quadratic component associated with SCA was<br />
much higher than that associated with GCA, <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g nonadditive effects as the most important. Estimates of<br />
GCA effects <strong>in</strong>dicate that Quilla 66304 is a promis<strong>in</strong>g parent for breed<strong>in</strong>g cold-tolerant genotypes.<br />
<strong>Rice</strong> is cultivated on nearly 1 million ha under irrigated conditions<br />
every year <strong>in</strong> Rio Grande do Sul (RS) <strong>in</strong> southern Brazil.<br />
The grow<strong>in</strong>g season extends from September to April, but on<br />
average the crop is sown <strong>in</strong> October and harvested <strong>in</strong> late<br />
March. The average temperature dur<strong>in</strong>g this period is 25 °C,<br />
but cool temperatures occur <strong>in</strong> February, when the crop is <strong>in</strong><br />
the reproductive stage, thus lower<strong>in</strong>g rice yields. Early sow<strong>in</strong>g<br />
is recommended to avoid cool temperature when the plant is<br />
<strong>in</strong> the reproductive stage. However, <strong>in</strong> some regions, cool temperatures<br />
<strong>in</strong> early October limit germ<strong>in</strong>ation and field establishment,<br />
lead<strong>in</strong>g to poor stands and poor plant development,<br />
and h<strong>in</strong>der<strong>in</strong>g the benefits of this practice. For this reason, it is<br />
necessary to have cold-tolerant genotypes at the germ<strong>in</strong>ation<br />
stage.<br />
56 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
Table 1. Analysis of variance for comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g ability<br />
for cold tolerance at the germ<strong>in</strong>ation stage <strong>in</strong> rice.<br />
Source of variation df Mean squares<br />
Treatment 20 70.64**<br />
GCA 5 122.52**<br />
SCA 15 53.35**<br />
Error 40 8.07<br />
Φ<br />
a g 14.31<br />
Φ s 45.28<br />
a<br />
Quadratic component. GCA = general comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g ability, SCA<br />
= specific comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g ability. ** = significant at P = 0.01.<br />
Table 2. General and specific comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g ability effects for cold tolerance at the germ<strong>in</strong>ation<br />
stage <strong>in</strong> 15 F 1 hybrids and their parents.<br />
Genotype<br />
SCA effects a<br />
GCA<br />
IRGA 417 IR8 Quilla Diamante Quilla effects<br />
66304 64117<br />
E-Taim –0.39 14.7** –8.04** –9.12** –8.18** 0.30<br />
IRGA 417 0.0 –3.24 4.28 –9.28** –1.20<br />
IR8 –3.65 –5.03 –0.99 7.41**<br />
Quilla 66304 9.53** 5.37 –4.15**<br />
Diamante 4.00 –1.08<br />
Quilla 64117 –1.31<br />
a ** = significant at P = 0.01.<br />
Breed<strong>in</strong>g rice for cold tolerance at the germ<strong>in</strong>ation stage<br />
has been done under field conditions, but the lack of enough<br />
uniform selection pressure and <strong>in</strong>teraction with other abiotic<br />
and biotic stresses make it difficult to select for this trait <strong>in</strong><br />
such conditions. Selection can be done <strong>in</strong> the laboratory, where<br />
many seeds can be tested under the same selection pressure.<br />
Many screen<strong>in</strong>g methods have been described (Bert<strong>in</strong> et al<br />
1996, Sthapit and Witcombe 1998) and these confirm the efficacy<br />
of this strategy for select<strong>in</strong>g superior genotypes for germ<strong>in</strong>ation<br />
under cool temperatures. Chill<strong>in</strong>g tolerance dur<strong>in</strong>g<br />
germ<strong>in</strong>ation was reported to be controlled by four or more<br />
dom<strong>in</strong>ant genes (Sasaki et al 1973) and heritabilities rang<strong>in</strong>g<br />
from 0.7 to 0.9 were obta<strong>in</strong>ed by Sthapit and Witcombe (1998).<br />
<strong>Rice</strong> genotypes cultivated <strong>in</strong> RS, Brazil, belong ma<strong>in</strong>ly to the<br />
<strong>in</strong>dica subspecies and <strong>in</strong> general are cold-sensitive <strong>in</strong> all developmental<br />
stages. A study conducted on 26 <strong>in</strong>dica and<br />
japonica genotypes <strong>in</strong>dicated that, although japonica genotypes<br />
are generally more tolerant, the trait varies among the <strong>in</strong>dicas<br />
(Cruz and Milach 1999).<br />
This study aimed to determ<strong>in</strong>e the comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g ability of<br />
six rice genotypes for low-temperature tolerance at the germ<strong>in</strong>ation<br />
stage.<br />
Materials and methods<br />
Six rice genotypes were crossed <strong>in</strong> a partial diallel, exclud<strong>in</strong>g<br />
reciprocals—three cold-tolerant japonica types (Quilla 66304,<br />
Quilla 64117, and Diamante) and <strong>in</strong>dica cultivars, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g<br />
cold-sensitive IR8, E-Taim, and IRGA 417, which represent<br />
the agronomic type cultivated <strong>in</strong> RS. The female parent <strong>in</strong><br />
crosses between <strong>in</strong>dica and japonica genotypes was always<br />
the <strong>in</strong>dica genotype.<br />
Seeds were surface-sterilized <strong>in</strong> 70% ethanol for 30 sec<br />
and 5% sodium hypoclorite for 20 m<strong>in</strong> and then r<strong>in</strong>sed six<br />
times with sterilized distilled water. Twenty seeds from each<br />
parent and 10 F 1 seeds per cross were used, with three replications<br />
per experiment. Two experiments were conducted, one<br />
<strong>in</strong> which the seeds were kept at 28 °C for 7 d to serve as a<br />
control and another <strong>in</strong> which the seeds were kept at 13 °C for<br />
28 d. Experiments were conducted <strong>in</strong> a randomized block design<br />
<strong>in</strong> which each replication constituted a different shelf <strong>in</strong><br />
the <strong>in</strong>cubation chamber. At the end of the period, coleoptile<br />
length was measured and cold tolerance was expressed as the<br />
percentage reduction <strong>in</strong> coleoptile length because of the cold<br />
compared with normal conditions. A comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g ability analysis<br />
was performed us<strong>in</strong>g method 2, model 1 of Griff<strong>in</strong>g (1956).<br />
S<strong>in</strong>ce the number of genotypes crossed was small and they<br />
did not represent a broad range of variation, a fixed model<br />
was adopted.<br />
Results and discussion<br />
The comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g ability analysis (Table 1) showed highly significant<br />
mean squares because of general and specific comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />
ability (GCA and SCA), reveal<strong>in</strong>g that both additive<br />
and nonadditive gene action are <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> low-temperature<br />
tolerance at the germ<strong>in</strong>ation stage. The quadratic component<br />
associated with SCA is three times greater than the one associated<br />
with GCA, <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g the relative importance of SCA<br />
for cold tolerance at the germ<strong>in</strong>ation stage <strong>in</strong> rice and suggest<strong>in</strong>g<br />
that the nonadditive type of gene action is the ma<strong>in</strong> one.<br />
This type of gene action has also been verified for cold tolerance<br />
at the seedl<strong>in</strong>g stage <strong>in</strong> rice, although simple <strong>in</strong>heritance<br />
has also been demonstrated (Kwak et al 1984).<br />
Table 2 presents estimates of GCA effects of parents<br />
and SCA effects of crosses. Only two parents showed significant<br />
GCA effects, Quilla 66304 (a highly significant negative<br />
one) and IR8 (a highly significant positive one). In this study,<br />
negative effects were desirable because they expressed less<br />
percentage reduction <strong>in</strong> coleoptile length caused by cold temperature.<br />
Hence, Quilla 66304 was the best parent and IR8 the<br />
poorest for breed<strong>in</strong>g for this trait.<br />
Four crosses showed highly significant negative SCA<br />
effects (Table 2); three of them <strong>in</strong>volved the susceptible E-<br />
Taim and the three tolerant japonica genotypes, and one <strong>in</strong>volved<br />
the susceptible IRGA 417 and Quilla 64117. Among<br />
these, the population E-Taim × Quilla 66304 was the most<br />
appropriate for select<strong>in</strong>g cold-tolerant genotypes, as shown<br />
by the highly significant GCA effect of the tolerant parent<br />
(Table 2). Three populations present highly positive SCA ef-<br />
<strong>Genetics</strong> and breed<strong>in</strong>g of agronomic traits 57
fects, demonstrat<strong>in</strong>g that they <strong>in</strong>volve poor comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g genotypes<br />
for germ<strong>in</strong>ation-stage low-temperature tolerance. The<br />
other crosses did not show significant SCA effects.<br />
The genetics of cold tolerance at the germ<strong>in</strong>ation stage<br />
for Brazilian rice genotypes is poorly understood. Results demonstrated<br />
that it was possible to differentiate among genotypes<br />
and their F 1 progenies under such conditions. A previous study<br />
<strong>in</strong>dicated a high level of genetic variability for low-temperature<br />
tolerance at the germ<strong>in</strong>ation stage (Cruz and Milach 1999).<br />
Current data <strong>in</strong>dicated that, among the genotypes tested, this<br />
variability was mostly related to the nonadditive type of gene<br />
action. Among the genotypes studied, Quilla 66304 was the<br />
best parent for <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g the level of cold tolerance at the<br />
germ<strong>in</strong>ation stage <strong>in</strong> rice.<br />
References<br />
Bert<strong>in</strong> P, K<strong>in</strong>et JM, Bouharmont J. 1996. Evaluation of chill<strong>in</strong>g sensitivity<br />
<strong>in</strong> different rice varieties: relationship between screen<strong>in</strong>g<br />
procedures applied dur<strong>in</strong>g germ<strong>in</strong>ation and vegetative<br />
growth. Euphytica 89:201-210.<br />
Cruz RP de la, Milach SCK. 1999. Variabilidade genética em arroz<br />
irrigado (Oryza sativa L.) para tolerância ao frio durante a<br />
germ<strong>in</strong>ação. In: Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs of the 45° Congresso Nacional<br />
de Genética, 3-6 October 1999, Gramado, Brazil. p 699.<br />
Griff<strong>in</strong>g B. 1956. Concept of general and specific comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g ability<br />
<strong>in</strong> relation to diallel cross<strong>in</strong>g systems. Austr. J. Biol. Sci. 9:463-<br />
493.<br />
Kwak TS, Vergara BS, Nanda JS, Coffman WR. 1984. Inheritance<br />
of seedl<strong>in</strong>g cold tolerance <strong>in</strong> rice. SABRAO J. 16:83-86.<br />
Sasaki T, K<strong>in</strong>oshita T, Takahashi MT. 1973. Estimation of the number<br />
of genes <strong>in</strong> germ<strong>in</strong>ation ability at low temperature <strong>in</strong> rice—<br />
genetical studies <strong>in</strong> rice plant. LVII. J. Fac. Agric. Hokkaido<br />
Univ. 57:301-312.<br />
Sthapit BR, Witcombe JR. 1998. Inheritance of tolerance to chill<strong>in</strong>g<br />
stress <strong>in</strong> rice dur<strong>in</strong>g germ<strong>in</strong>ation and plumule green<strong>in</strong>g. Crop<br />
Sci. 38:660-665.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ addresses: R.P. de la Cruz, S.C.K. Milach, L.C. Federizzi,<br />
Department of Crop Plants, Rio Grande do Sul Federal University,<br />
P.O. Box 776, 91501-970, Porto Alegre; A.F. de Rosso,<br />
Rio Grande do Sul <strong>Rice</strong> Institute, P.O. Box 29, 94930-030,<br />
Cachoeir<strong>in</strong>ha, RS, Brazil.<br />
Inheritance of nitrogen efficiency under alum<strong>in</strong>um<br />
stress <strong>in</strong> upland rice l<strong>in</strong>es<br />
Y. Jagau, A. Makmur, H. Aswid<strong>in</strong>noor, and S.H. Sutjahjo<br />
Four upland rice l<strong>in</strong>es differ<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> nitrogen (N) efficiency, Krowal and Banih Kun<strong>in</strong>g (N-efficient l<strong>in</strong>es)<br />
and CT6510-24-1-3 and Grogol (N-<strong>in</strong>efficient l<strong>in</strong>es), were used <strong>in</strong> crosses. Six generations (P 1<br />
, P 2<br />
, F 1<br />
,<br />
F 2<br />
, BC 1<br />
, and BC 2<br />
) of each cross-comb<strong>in</strong>ation were grown simultaneously <strong>in</strong> Yoshida nutrient solution<br />
with 5 ppm N and 45 ppm Al. After 14 d, seedl<strong>in</strong>g dry weight and tissue N content were measured.<br />
Seedl<strong>in</strong>g and dry weight N-use efficiency (NUE) were controlled by nuclear genes (no maternal effect).<br />
The variability for both characters was controlled by the effect of additive [d], dom<strong>in</strong>ance [h], additive<br />
× additive <strong>in</strong>teraction [i], and dom<strong>in</strong>ance × dom<strong>in</strong>ance <strong>in</strong>teraction [l]. The environmental effect for<br />
both characters was high, whereas the broad-sense heritability values were low. Based on narrowsense<br />
heritability, although the variability of both characters was controlled by the additive, dom<strong>in</strong>ance,<br />
and <strong>in</strong>teraction effects, the additive effect had a higher effect than the others. The higher<br />
additive effect for both characters allows selection of N-efficient l<strong>in</strong>es, but the selection must be done<br />
<strong>in</strong> later generations.<br />
The upland area <strong>in</strong> Indonesia is estimated to be about 48.3<br />
million ha. This area is dom<strong>in</strong>ated by Ultisols with some chemical<br />
constra<strong>in</strong>ts to plant growth, such as high soil acidity, alum<strong>in</strong>um<br />
toxicity, and low nutrient availability (Marschner 1995).<br />
Alum<strong>in</strong>um is one of the dom<strong>in</strong>ant constra<strong>in</strong>ts that limit plant<br />
growth. It <strong>in</strong>hibits N uptake and assimilation <strong>in</strong> plants, so it<br />
can <strong>in</strong>fluence N efficiency (Jagau 2000). S<strong>in</strong>ce upland rice<br />
l<strong>in</strong>es have varied reactions to Al toxicity and low N availability<br />
(Noor-Farid et al 1997), a variety that is able to cope with<br />
these constra<strong>in</strong>ts needs to be developed. Inheritance of N efficiency<br />
under non-Al-stress conditions was reported, but not<br />
under Al-stress conditions. This study was therefore conducted<br />
to understand the genetic control of N efficiency under alum<strong>in</strong>um-stress<br />
conditions.<br />
Materials and methods<br />
Four upland rice l<strong>in</strong>es selected from 150 l<strong>in</strong>es were used <strong>in</strong><br />
this study (Noor-Farid et al 1997, Jagau 2000). Two Al-tolerant<br />
and N-efficient l<strong>in</strong>es (Krowal and Banih Kun<strong>in</strong>g) and two<br />
Al-tolerant and N-<strong>in</strong>efficient l<strong>in</strong>es (CT6510-24-1-3 and<br />
Grogol) were crossed <strong>in</strong> all comb<strong>in</strong>ations. P 1 , P 2 , F 1 , and their<br />
58 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
eciprocals, and BC 1 , BC 2 , and F 2 populations were developed<br />
from each cross-comb<strong>in</strong>ation. Three-day-old seedl<strong>in</strong>gs<br />
were grown on a nylon net <strong>in</strong> an 800-mL plastic conta<strong>in</strong>er with<br />
Yoshida nutrient solution (Yoshida et al 1976) with 5 ppm N<br />
and 45 ppm Al (Noor-Farid et al 1997). The solution pH was<br />
ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed at 4.0. Individual conta<strong>in</strong>ers were placed randomly<br />
<strong>in</strong> a screenhouse. Fourteen days after transplant<strong>in</strong>g, all plants<br />
were harvested and dried <strong>in</strong> a 70 °C oven for 3 d. Seedl<strong>in</strong>g dry<br />
weight (SDW) was measured and total N was analyzed by<br />
persulfate digestion. Nitrogen-use efficiency (NUE) was calculated<br />
accord<strong>in</strong>g to Siddiqi and Glass (1981) as SDW per N<br />
concentration <strong>in</strong> tissue.<br />
A generation mean analysis was made us<strong>in</strong>g the jo<strong>in</strong>t<br />
scal<strong>in</strong>g test described by Mather and J<strong>in</strong>ks (1971), which estimates<br />
the midparent, genetic components, and digenic <strong>in</strong>teraction<br />
genetic components. The genetic components consisted<br />
of the additive component [d] and the dom<strong>in</strong>ance component<br />
[h]. Interaction components were the additive × additive component<br />
[i], additive × dom<strong>in</strong>ance component [j], and dom<strong>in</strong>ance<br />
× dom<strong>in</strong>ance component [l]. These estimates were used<br />
to fit the data to eight genetic models: (1) m [d]; (2) m [d] [h];<br />
(3) m [d] [h] [i]; (4) m [d] [h] [j]; (5) m [d] [h] [l]; (6) m [d] [h]<br />
[i] [j]; (7) m [d] [h] [i] [l]; and (8) m [d] [h] [j] [l]. The model<br />
was considered appropriate if the chi-square test probability<br />
level was 0.05 or greater. Individual genetic components were<br />
tested for significance us<strong>in</strong>g Student’s t-test. Genetic components<br />
estimated to be different from zero at P
References<br />
Jagau Y. 2000. Physiology and <strong>in</strong>heritance of nitrogen efficiency<br />
under alum<strong>in</strong>um stress condition <strong>in</strong> upland rice l<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong> Indonesia.<br />
PhD thesis. Bogor Agricultural Institute, Bogor. 139 p.<br />
Makmur A, Gerloff GC, Gabelman WH. 1978. Physiology and <strong>in</strong>heritance<br />
of efficiency <strong>in</strong> potassium utilization <strong>in</strong> tomatoes<br />
grown under potassium stress. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci.<br />
103(4):545-549.<br />
Marschner H. 1995. M<strong>in</strong>eral nutrition of higher plants. 2nd ed. San<br />
Diego, Calif. (USA): Academic Press. p 6-78, 596-625.<br />
Mather K, J<strong>in</strong>ks JL. 1971. Biometrical genetics. London (UK):<br />
Chapman and Hall Ltd. 382 p.<br />
Noor-Farid S, Asfarudd<strong>in</strong>, Trikoesoeman<strong>in</strong>gtyas, Jagau Y, Sopandie<br />
D, Makmur A. 1997. Prelim<strong>in</strong>ary study on variability of nutrient<br />
element efficiency under alum<strong>in</strong>ium stress condition <strong>in</strong><br />
upland rice (Oryza sativa L.). Paper presented at the <strong>International</strong><br />
Symposium on Plant Responses to Ionic Stress: Alum<strong>in</strong>ium<br />
and Other Ions, September 1997, Kurashiki, Japan.<br />
O’Sullivan J, Gabelman WH, Gerloff GC. 1974. Variation <strong>in</strong> efficiency<br />
of nitrogen utilization <strong>in</strong> tomatoes (Lycopersicum<br />
esculentum Mill.) grown under nitrogen stress. J. Am. Soc.<br />
Hort. Sci. 99:543-547.<br />
Siddiqi MY, Glass ADM. 1981. Utilization <strong>in</strong>dex: a modified approach<br />
to estimation and comparison of nutrient utilization<br />
efficiency <strong>in</strong> plants. J. Plant Nutr. 4:289-302.<br />
Yoshida S, Forno DA, Cock JA, Gomez KA. 1976. Laboratory manual<br />
for physiological studies of rice. 3rd ed. Los Baños (Philipp<strong>in</strong>es):<br />
<strong>International</strong> <strong>Rice</strong> Research Institute. 83 p.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ addresses: Y. Jagau, Department of Agronomy, Faculty of<br />
Agriculture, University of Palangka Raya, Central Kalimantan;<br />
A. Makmur, H. Aswid<strong>in</strong>noor, and S.H. Sutjahjo, Department<br />
of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, Bogor Agricultural<br />
University, Bogor, West Java, Indonesia.<br />
Genetic mechanism of variegation of a chlorophyll<br />
mutant orig<strong>in</strong>ated from the cross between distantly<br />
related rice varieties<br />
M. Maekawa and K. Noda<br />
A variegated yellow leaf mutant (yl-v) was obta<strong>in</strong>ed spontaneously <strong>in</strong> the F 2<br />
<strong>in</strong> a cross between an <strong>in</strong>dica native<br />
variety, C-5052, and a japonica marker l<strong>in</strong>e, H-126. This mutant segregates variegated (yl-v) and stable (yl-stb)<br />
phenotypes and germ<strong>in</strong>al revertants, <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g that it is unstable. The effects of gamma rays or 5-azacytid<strong>in</strong>e<br />
and genetic factor(s) on the <strong>in</strong>duction of variegation <strong>in</strong> a yl-stb near-isogenic l<strong>in</strong>e (NIL) were studied. In the M 1<br />
population treated with 0.3 mM 5-azacytid<strong>in</strong>e, 50.5% of all yl-stb plants showed variegation, while no variegated<br />
yl plants were observed <strong>in</strong> M 1<br />
plants treated with 300 Gy gamma rays. Although most M 2<br />
plants derived from<br />
variegated yl plants <strong>in</strong> M 1<br />
showed stable yellow leaf phenotypes, only 1% of the M 2<br />
plants showed variegated<br />
phenotypes. This suggested that yl-stb phenotypes may have arisen because the genetic factor was <strong>in</strong>activated<br />
through methylation. In the F 2<br />
of the cross of yl-stb NIL with H-126, variegated yl plants were observed. The<br />
frequency of yl-v to yl plants (yl-stb and yl-v) was 77.4%, suggest<strong>in</strong>g that H-126 carries a dom<strong>in</strong>ant factor<br />
responsible for the variegation. In contrast, the F 2<br />
populations from crosses between yl-stb NIL and marker l<strong>in</strong>es,<br />
except for H-126, segregate <strong>in</strong>to normal and yl-stb plants. These results suggest that yl-stb is caused by a<br />
methylation-<strong>in</strong>activated factor <strong>in</strong>serted and variegation of yl is caused by a factor reactivated through demethylation.<br />
Further, H-126 likely carries a genetic factor that <strong>in</strong>duces demethylation.<br />
Transposable elements are very powerful genetic tools for gene<br />
isolation (Walbot 1992). The maize Ac/Ds system for<br />
transposon tagg<strong>in</strong>g has been used <strong>in</strong> many plant species<br />
(Sundaresan 1996). If endogenous active transposons like Ac/<br />
Ds <strong>in</strong> maize were discovered and cloned <strong>in</strong> rice, large-scale<br />
screen<strong>in</strong>g for tagged mutants could be easily conducted and<br />
rapid progress <strong>in</strong> gene clon<strong>in</strong>g by transposon tagg<strong>in</strong>g could be<br />
made <strong>in</strong> rice. However, no endogenous active transposons <strong>in</strong><br />
rice have been found yet. Genetic variegations not controlled<br />
by cytoplasmic <strong>in</strong>heritance are often conferred by excis<strong>in</strong>g a<br />
DNA transposable element. The genetic analysis of a variegated<br />
mutant could lead to the first f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g of a DNA transposable<br />
element that can transpose <strong>in</strong> an <strong>in</strong>tact rice genome. A<br />
variegated yellow leaf (yl) mutant was obta<strong>in</strong>ed spontaneously<br />
<strong>in</strong> the F 2 of the cross between an <strong>in</strong>dica native variety, C-5052,<br />
and a japonica marker l<strong>in</strong>e, H-126. This mutant produced germ<strong>in</strong>al<br />
revertants and stable phenotypes. Furthermore, a heterozygous<br />
plant for the yl gene showed aberrant segregation<br />
of yl with panicles. This yl gene is unstable and is possibly<br />
controlled by a transposon. We produced a near-isogenic l<strong>in</strong>e<br />
(NIL) show<strong>in</strong>g stable yellow leaf (yl-stb) with the genetic background<br />
of the japonica variety Taichung 65 (T-65). To determ<strong>in</strong>e<br />
the genetic factor(s) responsible for the variegation of<br />
the yellow leaf mutant, we exam<strong>in</strong>ed the effects of gamma rays<br />
or 5-azacytid<strong>in</strong>e and genetic factor(s) on the <strong>in</strong>duction of variegation<br />
<strong>in</strong> a yl-stb NIL plant.<br />
60 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
Table 1. Aberrant segregation of the yl character <strong>in</strong> F 2 and F 3 derived from a s<strong>in</strong>gle F 1 plant of<br />
the cross Shiokari yl-v NIL/T-65.<br />
F 2 segregation<br />
Primary Panicle#1 Panicle#2 F 3 segregation from panicle#2<br />
branch<br />
Green yl-stb yl-v Green yl-stb yl-v Green fixed yl seg. yl fixed<br />
1st a 7 1 2 10 0 0 10 0 0<br />
2nd 11 0 1 13 0 0 13 0 0<br />
3rd 4 1 2 16 0 0 14 0 0<br />
4th 6 0 3 19 0 0 13 0 0<br />
5th 12 3 2 15 0 3 8 7 2<br />
6th 8 1 3 9 0 0 8 0 0<br />
7th 5 1 1 16 0 0 15 0 0<br />
8th 6 0 3 8 0 0 7 0 0<br />
Total 59 7 17 106 0 3 88 7 2<br />
a<br />
The primary branch is numbered from the top to the lower branches.<br />
Characterization of yl mutant<br />
A variegated yl mutant was obta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> 148 F 2 plants of the<br />
cross between H-126 and C-5052, an <strong>in</strong>dica variety. This variegated<br />
yl character was <strong>in</strong>troduced <strong>in</strong>to Shiokari, a variety <strong>in</strong><br />
Hokkaido, Japan, and T-65 by the cross<strong>in</strong>g-self<strong>in</strong>g cycl<strong>in</strong>g<br />
method; a mutant that survived <strong>in</strong> the F 2 of the cross between<br />
the mutant and Shiokari or T-65 was crossed with Shiokari or<br />
T-65. A surviv<strong>in</strong>g mutant was obta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> the F 2 derived from<br />
selfed F 1 of the cross. Thus, we produced Shiokari yl-v (variegated<br />
yl) and yl-stb (stable yl) and T-65 yl-stb NILs.<br />
A yl-stb plant produces only yl-stb progenies. In contrast,<br />
a yl-v plant produces yl-v, yl-stb, and revertants. The frequency<br />
of occurrence of yl-v progenies and revertants ranged<br />
from 13.9% to 61.2% and from 0% to 86.1%, respectively.<br />
Furthermore, it was confirmed that revertants derived from ylv<br />
plants fixed with a frequency of 35%. This result <strong>in</strong>dicated<br />
that revertants obta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> yl-v progenies were germ<strong>in</strong>al and<br />
the yl gene became normal <strong>in</strong> male and female gametes with<br />
similar frequencies. Genetic analysis for the yl character, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g<br />
yl-v and yl-stb, revealed that the yl character is governed<br />
by a s<strong>in</strong>gle recessive gene and not by cytoplasmic <strong>in</strong>heritance.<br />
However, the frequency of yl plants varied <strong>in</strong> the panicles<br />
of a s<strong>in</strong>gle F 1 plant of the cross Shiokari yl-v NIL/T-65 (Table<br />
1). Every branch of panicle#1 of the F 1 produced yl progenies<br />
with frequencies rang<strong>in</strong>g from 8.3% to 43%. However, <strong>in</strong><br />
panicle#2, only the fifth branch segregated for yl plants with a<br />
frequency of 17%; the other branch did not segregate for any<br />
yl plants. In the F 3 , normal green plants were fixed, with normal<br />
green-fixed, yl-segregated, and yl-fixed l<strong>in</strong>es derived only<br />
from the fifth branch. This result suggested that the yl gene<br />
reverted to normal at the primary branch differentiation stage.<br />
These results showed that the yl-v gene is mutable. The<br />
mutability of the gene could be attributed to a transposable<br />
element.<br />
Induction of variegation <strong>in</strong> yl-stb by mutagen treatments<br />
If the yl-v phenotype is <strong>in</strong>duced by an active transposable element,<br />
the yl-stb phenotype is hypothesized to be <strong>in</strong>duced by<br />
the <strong>in</strong>activation of the transposable element or footpr<strong>in</strong>t left<br />
after its excision at the yl locus. Thus, yl-stb heterozygous plants<br />
were treated with 300 Gy gamma rays and 0.3 mM 5-<br />
azacytid<strong>in</strong>e because yl-stb homozygous plants are sublethal<br />
and large amounts of seeds of yl-stb homozygous plants could<br />
not be obta<strong>in</strong>ed. As a result, 50.5% of the yl plants showed<br />
clear variegated phenotypes <strong>in</strong> the M 1 population treated with<br />
5-azacytid<strong>in</strong>e; 1.9% showed vague variegated types <strong>in</strong> the M 1<br />
treated with gamma rays (Table 2). In contrast, the same vague<br />
variegated phenotypes (1.7%) as those <strong>in</strong> the M 1 treated with<br />
gamma rays were observed <strong>in</strong> progenies derived from yl-stb<br />
heterozygous plants. The frequency of variegated M 1 plants<br />
obta<strong>in</strong>ed from the 5-azacytid<strong>in</strong>e treatment was much higher<br />
than that <strong>in</strong> variegated M 1 plants treated with gamma ray irradiation<br />
or variegated progenies obta<strong>in</strong>ed by self<strong>in</strong>g. Variegation<br />
was <strong>in</strong>duced by 5-azacytid<strong>in</strong>e.<br />
Inheritance of yl-v <strong>in</strong> M 1 plants treated with 5-azacytid<strong>in</strong>e<br />
was exam<strong>in</strong>ed. Almost all M 2 plants from yl-v plants <strong>in</strong> M 1<br />
showed the yl-stb phenotype (Table 3). Only 28 of 2,699 plants<br />
exam<strong>in</strong>ed showed a clear yl-v phenotype <strong>in</strong> M 2 . This <strong>in</strong>dicated<br />
that most yl-v phenotypes <strong>in</strong> M 1 were transient. In contrast, ylstb<br />
plants <strong>in</strong> M 1 produced only one yl-v progeny, which was of<br />
the vague type. S<strong>in</strong>ce 5-azacytid<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong>duces demethylation of<br />
DNA (Raz<strong>in</strong> and Riggs 1980), part of the yl-stb phenotypes<br />
possibly resulted from the <strong>in</strong>activation of the genetic factor(s)<br />
through methylation.<br />
Induction of variegation <strong>in</strong> yl-stb by a genetic factor<br />
To determ<strong>in</strong>e the genetic factor(s) responsible for <strong>in</strong>duc<strong>in</strong>g<br />
variegation <strong>in</strong> yl-stb, we conducted a genetic analysis of the<br />
progenies from crosses of the yl-stb NIL with marker l<strong>in</strong>es C-<br />
5052 and H-126. T-65 yl-stb BC 3 F 1 and BC 4 F 1 plants segregated<br />
for yl-v plants with frequencies of 1.7% and 0.9%, re-<br />
<strong>Genetics</strong> and breed<strong>in</strong>g of agronomic traits 61
Table 2. Frequency of variegated yl plants <strong>in</strong> the M 1 generation of mutagen-treated T-65 yl-stb BC 3 F 1 .<br />
M 1 generation<br />
Stra<strong>in</strong> Mutagen Treated % of % of<br />
seeds % Normal yl-stb yl-v Total yl-stb + yl-v b<br />
(no.) germ<strong>in</strong>ation yl-v a<br />
T-65 yl-stb BC 3 F 1 5-azacytid<strong>in</strong>e 3,003 95.0 1,846 498 509 c 2,853 35.3 50.5<br />
T-65 897 99.2 890 0 0 890 0.0 0.0<br />
T-65 yl-stb BC 3 F 1 γ-irradiation 6,986 69.4 3,272 1,546 30 d 4,848 32.5 1.9<br />
T-65 3,312 46.5 1,540 0 0 1,540 0.0 0.0<br />
T-65 yl-stb BC 3 F 1 Control 756 93.4 468 234 4 d 706 33.7 1.7<br />
T-65 120 96.7 116 0 0 116 0.0 0.0<br />
a % of yl-stb + yl-v = no. of yl-stb and yl-v plants × 100/total plants observed. b % of yl-v = no. of yl-v plants × 100/no. of yl-stb and yl-v plants.<br />
c Clear variegation. d Vague variegation.<br />
Table 3. Frequency of occurrence of variegated yl phenotype <strong>in</strong> M 2 plants derived from yl-stb and yl-v<br />
plants <strong>in</strong> M 1 treated with 5-azacytid<strong>in</strong>e.<br />
Transplanted Plants that M 2 generation % of<br />
Phenotype <strong>in</strong> M 1 plants survived yl-v a<br />
(no.) (no. and %) Normal yl-stb yl-v Total<br />
yl-v 290 200 (69.0) 2 2,669 28 b 2,699 1.1<br />
yl-stb 330 48 (14.8) 0 592 1 c 593 0.2<br />
T-65 yl-stb BC 3 F 2 (control) 220 31 (14.1) 0 331 0 331 0.0<br />
a % of yl-v = no. of yl-v plants × 100/total plants observed. b Clear variegation. c Vague variegation.<br />
Table 4. Segregation <strong>in</strong>to yl-stb and yl-v <strong>in</strong> F 2 s of crosses between T-65 yl-stb and<br />
marker l<strong>in</strong>es.<br />
F 2 segregation % of % of<br />
Cross comb<strong>in</strong>ation Total (yl-stb + yl-v) yl-v a<br />
Norm. yl-stb yl-v<br />
T-65 yl-stb BC 3 F 2 /CI-6 152 27 0 179 15.1 0.0<br />
A-28/T-65 yl-stb BC 4 F 2 171 103 0 274 37.6 0.0<br />
H-126/T-65 yl-stb BC 4 F 2 196 19 65 b 280 30.0 77.4<br />
H-138/T-65 yl-stb BC 4 F 2 152 97 0 249 39.0 0.0<br />
T-65 yl-stb BC 3 F 1 468 234 4 c 706 33.7 1.7<br />
T-65 yl-stb BC 4 F 1 235 114 1 c 350 32.9 0.9<br />
a No. of yl-v plants/(total no. of yl-stb plants and yl-v plants) × 100. b Clear variegation. c Vague variegation.<br />
spectively (Table 4). However, all the yl-v plants that appeared<br />
<strong>in</strong> the BC 3 F 2 and BC 4 F 2 had vague variegation seen only <strong>in</strong><br />
the leaves. The F 2 populations from crosses between T-65 ylstb<br />
BC 3 F 2 or BC 4 F 2 plants and marker l<strong>in</strong>es, except those from<br />
the cross H-126/T-65 yl-stb BC 4 F 2 plants, segregated <strong>in</strong>to<br />
normal and yl-stb plants. In contrast, the cross H-126/T-65 ylstb<br />
BC 4 F 2 produced yl-v plants <strong>in</strong> addition to normal and ylstb<br />
plants. All the yl-v plants of this cross showed clear variegations<br />
on many leaves. The frequency of yl-v to yl plants (ylstb<br />
and yl-v) was 77.4%, suggest<strong>in</strong>g that H-126 carries a dom<strong>in</strong>ant<br />
factor responsible for the variegation through<br />
demethylation.<br />
These results suggested that the yl-v mutant obta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong><br />
F 2 s of the cross C-5052/H-126 may have been <strong>in</strong>duced by a<br />
transposable element and that the yl-stb phenotype was probably<br />
controlled by the <strong>in</strong>activation of the transposable element<br />
through methylation.<br />
References<br />
Raz<strong>in</strong> A, Riggs AD. 1980. DNA methylation and gene function.<br />
Science 210:604-610.<br />
Sundaresan V. 1996. Horizontal spread of transposon mutagenesis:<br />
new uses for old elements. Trends Plant Sci. 1:184-190.<br />
Walbot V. 1992. Strategies for mutagenesis and gene clon<strong>in</strong>g us<strong>in</strong>g<br />
transposon tagg<strong>in</strong>g and T-DNA <strong>in</strong>sertional mutagenesis. Annu.<br />
Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 43:49-82.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ address: Research Institute for Bioresources, Okayama<br />
University, Kurashiki 710-0046, Japan.<br />
Acknowledgments: This work was supported partly by a grant-<strong>in</strong>aid<br />
(No. 10556002) from Monbusho, Japan.<br />
62 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
Major genes controll<strong>in</strong>g spikelet number per panicle <strong>in</strong> rice<br />
R. Mishra and M.P. Janoria<br />
The <strong>in</strong>heritance of spikelets panicle –1 , spikelets primary branch –1 , and spikelets secondary branch –1 was studied<br />
<strong>in</strong> the cross IR58025A/R704. The F 2<br />
distribution for each of these characters gave a good fit with a 63 low:1 high<br />
ratio. These results <strong>in</strong>dicated that three <strong>in</strong>dependent loci with complete dom<strong>in</strong>ance were <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> each case<br />
and that the dom<strong>in</strong>ant allele at each locus produced a similarly low number of spikelets without a cumulative<br />
effect. The three characters showed a highly significant correlation with one another, <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g that the same<br />
three loci may be <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> pleiotropic control of the three characters.<br />
Spikelet number per panicle is important because this, together<br />
with the number of panicles m –2 and average gra<strong>in</strong> weight,<br />
determ<strong>in</strong>es the gra<strong>in</strong> yield potential of rice. <strong>Rice</strong> scientists have<br />
recently focused attention on <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g the number of spikelets<br />
panicle –1 to enhance the genetic yield potential of rice.<br />
Thus, the new plant type of rice for the irrigated ecosystem<br />
targets 200 to 250 gra<strong>in</strong>s panicle –1 (<strong>IRRI</strong> 1989), which is equal<br />
to 235 to 295 spikelets panicle –1 at 85% fill<strong>in</strong>g. In contrast,<br />
current commercial cultivars possess around 100 spikelets<br />
panicle –1 .<br />
Available literature on the genetics of this important determ<strong>in</strong>ant<br />
of yield potential is limited and is concerned with<br />
various estimations of quantitative genetic parameters (Janoria<br />
et al 1991, Khaleque et al 1978, Shrivastava and Seshu 1983,<br />
Sivasubramaniam and Madharamenon 1973).<br />
Materials and methods<br />
We studied the <strong>in</strong>heritance of spikelets panicle –1 from the cross<br />
IR58025A/R704. IR58025A is a widely used <strong>IRRI</strong>-bred cytoplasmic<br />
male sterile (CMS) l<strong>in</strong>e. R704 is a breed<strong>in</strong>g l<strong>in</strong>e developed<br />
at Indira Gandhi Agricultural University, Raipur,<br />
Madhya Pradesh, India. Parental and F 2 populations were<br />
grown us<strong>in</strong>g 20 × 20-cm spac<strong>in</strong>g and 120 kg N ha –1 and 60 kg<br />
P 2 O 5 ha –1 <strong>in</strong> soils rich <strong>in</strong> K. Spikelet counts were made on<br />
panicles from the ma<strong>in</strong> culms of 10 random plants from each<br />
parent and 104 random F 2 plants. Data were subjected to standard<br />
statistical and genetic analysis.<br />
Results and discussion<br />
The F 2 distribution showed a good fit with a 63 low:1 high<br />
ratio and an <strong>in</strong>terven<strong>in</strong>g break between the two classes (Table<br />
1). The 27:9:9:9:3:3:3:1 ratio was modified <strong>in</strong>to 36:1 if the<br />
dom<strong>in</strong>ant alleles of all three loci produced the same phenotype<br />
without a cumulative effect. Thus, our tentative model<br />
assumes complete dom<strong>in</strong>ance for low spikelet number panicle<br />
–1 at each of the three loci <strong>in</strong>volved and that the dom<strong>in</strong>ant<br />
allele at each locus produces a similar low number of spikelets<br />
panicle –1 without a cumulative effect. Triple recessives constitute<br />
the high spikelet number class.<br />
We also studied the <strong>in</strong>heritance of spikelet number<br />
primary branch –1 (PB –1 ) and spikelet number secondary<br />
branch –1 (SB –1 ) <strong>in</strong> the same cross. In both cases, the F 2 data<br />
showed a good fit to the 63 low:1 high ratio (Tables 2 and 3).<br />
A close exam<strong>in</strong>ation of the F 2 distributions for all three char-<br />
Table 1. Distribution of spikelet number panicle –1 <strong>in</strong> parents and F 2 from the cross IR580025A/R704.<br />
Plants with spikelet number panicle –1 (no.) χ 2<br />
Population (63:1)<br />
151–200 201–250 251–300 301–350 351–400 401–450 451–500<br />
IR58025A 2 6 2 – – – – 0.09<br />
R704 1 5 4 – – – – –<br />
F 2 12 23 45 17 5 – 2 P>0.75<br />
Table 2. Distribution of spikelet number primary branch –1 <strong>in</strong> parents and F 2 from the cross IR580025A/R704.<br />
Plants with spikelet number primary branch –1 (no.)<br />
Population χ 2<br />
16– 18– 20– 22– 24– 26– 28– 30– 32– 34– 36– 38– (63:1)<br />
17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39<br />
IR58025A – 3 4 3 – – – – – – – – 0.09<br />
R704 – – 1 3 2 3 1 – – – – – P>0.75<br />
F 2 4 8 14 18 17 25 11 4 1 – 1 1<br />
<strong>Genetics</strong> and breed<strong>in</strong>g of agronomic traits 63
Table 3. Distribution of spikelet number secondary branch –1 <strong>in</strong> parents and F 2 from the cross IR580025A/R704.<br />
Plants with spikelet number secondary branch –1 (no.)<br />
Population c 2<br />
3.21– 3.41– 3.61– 3.81– 4.01– 4.21– 4.41– 4.61– 4.81– 5.01– 5.21– (63:1)<br />
3.40 3.60 3.80 4.00 4.20 4.40 4.60 4.80 5.00 5.20 5.40<br />
IR58025A – – 2 4 4 – – – – – – 0.09<br />
R704 – – 2 – 3 3 2 – – – – P>0.75<br />
F 2 1 2 9 16 27 20 16 5 6 – 2<br />
Table 4. Estimates of character correlation coefficients. a<br />
Character pairs<br />
Estimates of correlation<br />
coefficients<br />
Number of spikelets panicle –1 and 0.79**<br />
number of spikelets primary branch –1<br />
Number of spikelets panicle –1 and 0.74**<br />
number of spikelets secondary branch –1<br />
Number of spikelets primary branch –1 and 0.86**<br />
number of spikelets secondary branch –1<br />
a n = 104. ** = significant at the 1% level.<br />
acters revealed that the three high spikelet number classes conta<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
the same two plants. Similarly, other <strong>in</strong>dividual plants<br />
form<strong>in</strong>g a class <strong>in</strong> one character showed a tendency to fall<br />
together <strong>in</strong> the same or a neighbor<strong>in</strong>g class <strong>in</strong> the case of the<br />
other two characters. These results led us to suspect possible<br />
pleiotropic control of all three characters by the same three<br />
gene pairs. Pleiotropy, if present, would be expected to result<br />
<strong>in</strong> a high correlation between spikelets panicle –1 and spikelets<br />
PB –1 , spikelets panicle –1 and spikelets SB –1 , and spikelets<br />
PB –1 and spikelets SB –1 . Estimates of correlation coefficients<br />
for all character pairs were highly significant (Table 4) and<br />
support the hypothesis that the same three pairs pleiotropically<br />
controlled the three characters.<br />
References<br />
<strong>IRRI</strong> (<strong>International</strong> <strong>Rice</strong> Research Institute). 1989. <strong>IRRI</strong> towards<br />
2000 and beyond. Los Baños (Philipp<strong>in</strong>es): <strong>IRRI</strong>.<br />
Janoria MP, Rhodes AM, Shrivastava MN. 1991. Determ<strong>in</strong>ation of<br />
characters for panicle yield <strong>in</strong> early matur<strong>in</strong>g semidwarf varieties<br />
of rice under two fertility environments. Indian J. Genet.<br />
51:102-106.<br />
Khaleque MA, Joarder A, Eunus AM, Islam AKMN. 1978. Nature<br />
of gene <strong>in</strong>teraction <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>heritance of yield and yield components<br />
<strong>in</strong> some rice crosses. Oryza 5:157-172.<br />
Shrivastava MN, Seshu DV. 1983. Comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g ability for yield and<br />
associated characters <strong>in</strong> rice. Crop Sci. 23:741-744.<br />
Sivasubramaniam S, Madharamenon P. 1973. Comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g ability <strong>in</strong><br />
rice. Madras Agric. J. 60:1777-1778.<br />
Notes<br />
Genetic relationship between red pericarp<br />
and fertility restoration <strong>in</strong> rice<br />
S. Leenakumari, R. Gopakumar, and G. Uma<br />
Authors’ address: Department of Plant Breed<strong>in</strong>g and <strong>Genetics</strong>, J.N.<br />
Agricultural University, Jabalpur 482 004, India.<br />
The frequency of restorers for wild-abortive cytoplasmic male sterile (WA CMS) l<strong>in</strong>es was low among rice genotypes<br />
with red pericarp. Progenies with dark red pericarp derived from crosses <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g white-pericarp restorer<br />
parents and red-pericarp mutants of white restorers also failed to restore the fertility of WA CMS l<strong>in</strong>es completely,<br />
<strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g a possible relationship between the gene(s) for dark red pericarp (Rc) and the gene(s) for<br />
fertility restoration (Rf). The fertility of F 2<br />
and testcross progenies carry<strong>in</strong>g the Rc gene differed from that of<br />
crosses <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g restorers with white/light red kernels. The segregat<strong>in</strong>g population from a cross <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
CMS l<strong>in</strong>e IR58025A (white pericarp) and PTB50, which is a partial restorer for IR58025A with dark red pericarp,<br />
deviated from the normal ratios, <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g that the Rc gene responsible for dark red pericarp <strong>in</strong>teracts with the<br />
restorer gene(s). This resulted <strong>in</strong> varied expression of fertility. Crosses <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g PTB53 (Mangala Mahsuri, dark<br />
red pericarp selection from Mahsuri) with a restorer with white pericarp also showed similar segregation.<br />
64 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
Pericarp color is an important trait that <strong>in</strong>fluences the market<br />
value of rice. <strong>Rice</strong> with white pericarp is preferred <strong>in</strong> the world<br />
market, but rice with red pericarp is also popular <strong>in</strong> other parts<br />
of the world. Unlike <strong>in</strong> most states of India, red rice is grown<br />
extensively <strong>in</strong> Kerala, and this has a higher market value than<br />
white rice. In the search among red pericarp restorers for WA<br />
cytoplasm, the frequency of restorers among the red-pericarp<br />
genotypes was noted to be much less than that of partial restorers<br />
and ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ers (Leena Kumari et al 1998). Out of 60<br />
genotypes with red/light red pericarp used for cross<strong>in</strong>g with<br />
WA CMS l<strong>in</strong>es to produce 107 hybrids, only two genotypes<br />
with light red pericarp could restore the fertility of the CMS<br />
l<strong>in</strong>es completely. The red-pericarp genotype PTB50, derived<br />
from the cross between restorer variety IR36 and partial restorer<br />
MO.6, as well as PTB53, which is a red-rice variant of<br />
Mahsuri, a restorer for WA CMS l<strong>in</strong>es, failed to restore the<br />
fertility of WA CMS l<strong>in</strong>es completely. Genotypes KAU9412-<br />
8-1 and IR50138, identified as restorers for WA cytoplasm,<br />
had light red pericarp vis-à-vis the dark red pericarp of the<br />
other varieties. We studied the association between red pericarp<br />
and fertility restoration <strong>in</strong> rice.<br />
Materials and methods<br />
The study was carried out dur<strong>in</strong>g four seasons from the 1997<br />
dry season to 1999 wet season at the Regional Agricultural<br />
Research Station <strong>in</strong> Pattambi. The materials are composed of<br />
<strong>IRRI</strong>-derived CMS l<strong>in</strong>e IR58025A and elite genotypes IR36,<br />
IR1552, Mahsuri, KAU9412-8-1, PTB39, PTB46, PTB50, and<br />
PTB53. Seeds were collected from the restored comb<strong>in</strong>ations<br />
of IR58025A/IR36, IR58025A/Mahsuri, and IR58025A/KAU<br />
9412-8-1 and from partially restored comb<strong>in</strong>ations of<br />
IR58025A/PTB46, IR58025A/PTB50, and IR58025A/PTB53.<br />
Seeds of topcross comb<strong>in</strong>ations were collected from<br />
(IR58025A/PTB 39)//IR36 and (IR58025A/IR1552)//IR36.<br />
The pollen and spikelet fertility of each plant <strong>in</strong> the F 2 and<br />
testcross progenies and the topcross hybrids were determ<strong>in</strong>ed.<br />
Individual plants <strong>in</strong> the F 2 and testcross progenies were classified<br />
<strong>in</strong>to sterile, partially fertile, and fertile. The pericarp color<br />
of filled spikelets from three panicles of each plant was observed.<br />
Results and discussion<br />
Segregation for pollen fertility<br />
The pollen fertility of F 1 hybrids obta<strong>in</strong>ed from cross<strong>in</strong>g CMS<br />
l<strong>in</strong>e IR58025A with IR36, Mahsuri, and KAU9412-8-1 ranged<br />
from 80.4% to 84.3%, while that of hybrids <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g male<br />
parents PTB46, PTB50, and PTB53 ranged from 29.0% to<br />
34.0%. Hybrids between IR58025A and male parents such as<br />
PTB39 and IR1552 were completely sterile (Table 1). Accord<strong>in</strong>gly,<br />
the genotypes of the parents with respect to fertility restoration<br />
are assumed to be (Li and Yuan 1986)<br />
r 1 r 1 r 2 r 2 R 1 R 1 R 2 R 2 R 1 R 1 r 2 r 2 /r 1 r 1 R 2 R 2<br />
IR58025 A Mahsuri PTB46<br />
PTB39 KAU9412-8-1 PTB50<br />
IR1552 IR36 PTB53<br />
Segregation for pollen fertility <strong>in</strong> the F 2 and testcross<br />
progenies of crosses <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g IR36 and Mahsuri followed<br />
the 12:3:1 and 2:1:1 (fertile:partially fertile:sterile plants) patterns,<br />
<strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g the presence of two pairs of genes for fertility<br />
restoration that exhibited epistasis with complete dom<strong>in</strong>ance.<br />
Segregation for fertility <strong>in</strong> the F 2 and testcross progenies of<br />
IR58025A/KAU9412-8-1 had 9:6:1 and 1:2:1, respectively.<br />
This suggests epistasis with <strong>in</strong>complete dom<strong>in</strong>ance between<br />
the two gene pairs for fertility restoration carried by the pollen<br />
parent KAU9412-8-1 (Table 2).<br />
PTB46 was found to carry only one pair of genes for<br />
fertility restoration as reflected <strong>in</strong> the segregation ratio of 3<br />
partially fertile:1 sterile <strong>in</strong> the F 2 of the semi-restored comb<strong>in</strong>ation<br />
IR58025A/PTB46. Crosses <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g PTB50 and<br />
PTB53, on the other hand, gave a different segregation ratio<br />
<strong>in</strong> the F 2 as well as <strong>in</strong> the testcross generations. The deviation<br />
from the 3:1 ratio and the presence of completely fertile plants<br />
<strong>in</strong> the F 2 <strong>in</strong>dicate that these two genotypes carried more than<br />
one pair of genes for fertility restoration.<br />
Segregation for pericarp color<br />
Fertile plants <strong>in</strong> the F 1 hybrids <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g IR36, Mahsuri, and<br />
PTB 46 had white pericarp, whereas crosses <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g PTB50<br />
and PTB53 had dark red pericarp. The F 1 progenies of the<br />
cross with KAU9412-8-1 had light red pericarp. The F 2 progenies<br />
of the crosses between CMS l<strong>in</strong>e IR58025A and IR36,<br />
Mahsuri, and PTB46 all had white pericarp, suggest<strong>in</strong>g that<br />
both male and female parents <strong>in</strong> these crosses carried identical<br />
gene pairs for pericarp color. Segregation for pericarp color<br />
of the fertile and partially fertile progenies of crosses<br />
IR58025A/KAU 9412-8-1, IR58025A/PTB50, and<br />
IR58025A/PTB53 followed a 3:1 ratio of red (dark or light as<br />
the case may be):white, show<strong>in</strong>g that the male and female parents<br />
<strong>in</strong> these crosses differed only with respect to one gene<br />
pair (Table 3). Therefore, the genotypes of the parents, based<br />
on phenotypic characteristics, are described as follows<br />
(Takahashi 1972):<br />
RcRc RdRd Rc s Rc s RdRd rcrc RdRd<br />
PTB50 KAU9412-8-1 IR58025A<br />
PTB53<br />
IR36<br />
PTB46<br />
Mahsuri<br />
Jo<strong>in</strong>t segregation for pollen fertility and pericarp<br />
color<br />
The test for <strong>in</strong>dependent segregation between the genes for<br />
fertility restoration and pericarp color revealed a l<strong>in</strong>kage relationship<br />
between the two characters (Table 4). The location of<br />
<strong>Genetics</strong> and breed<strong>in</strong>g of agronomic traits 65
oth genes on the same chromosome (1, 3) also po<strong>in</strong>ts to this<br />
possibility. But the segregation ratio <strong>in</strong> the F 2 of crosses<br />
IR58025A/PTB50 and IR58025A/PTB53 was found to be different<br />
from that observed <strong>in</strong> IR58025A/KAU9412-8-1. The<br />
fertile progenies <strong>in</strong> the F 2 were much less than the expected<br />
number and all the fertile progenies had white pericarp. No<br />
completely fertile dark red progenies were observed among<br />
the segregat<strong>in</strong>g progenies of both hybrids, even though both<br />
pollen parents carried the genes for dark red kernel color. This<br />
<strong>in</strong>dicated a possible <strong>in</strong>teraction of the Rc genes with the genes<br />
for fertility restoration. The presence of Rc genes <strong>in</strong> the F 2<br />
Table 1. Pollen fertility and pericarp color of F 1 hybrids obta<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
from crosses of IR58025A with some elite rice genotypes.<br />
Hybrid comb<strong>in</strong>ation Pollen fertility (%) Pericarp color<br />
IR58025A/IR36 81.2 White<br />
IR58025A/IR1552 0.0 –<br />
IR58025A/Mahsuri 84.3 White<br />
IR58025A/PTB39 0.0 –<br />
IR58025A/PTB46 32.2 White<br />
IR58025A/PTB50 34.0 Dark red<br />
IR58025A/PTB53 29.9 Dark red<br />
IR58025A/KAU9412-8-1 80.4 Light red<br />
genotypes possibly <strong>in</strong>hibited the expression of one of the two<br />
gene pairs for fertility restoration, result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> varied expressions<br />
of fertility and a deviation from the expected ratios.<br />
References<br />
Leena Kumari S, Valarmathi G, Tessy Joseph, Kanakamony MT,<br />
Nayar NK. 1998. <strong>Rice</strong> varieties of Kerala as restorers and<br />
ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ers for wild abortive cytoplasmic male sterile l<strong>in</strong>es.<br />
Int. <strong>Rice</strong> Res. Notes 22(2):11-12.<br />
Li YC, Yuan LP. 1986. Genetic analysis of fertility restoration <strong>in</strong><br />
male sterile l<strong>in</strong>es of rice. In: <strong>Rice</strong> genetics II. Manila (Philipp<strong>in</strong>es):<br />
<strong>International</strong> <strong>Rice</strong> Research Institute. p 617- 632.<br />
Takahashi M, Mori T, K<strong>in</strong>oshita T, Mori K. 1972. Genetical studies<br />
on rice plants. I. Genetic constitution of red colouration <strong>in</strong><br />
rice gra<strong>in</strong>s of the Indian variety Surjamukhi. Res. Bull. Univ.<br />
Farm Hokkaido Univ. 18:47-53.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ address: Regional Agricultural Research Station, Pattambi,<br />
Kerala 679-306, India.<br />
Acknowledgments: The authors gratefully acknowledge ICAR for<br />
f<strong>in</strong>ancial assistance (<strong>in</strong> the form of ICAR CESS Fund) and<br />
the Regional Agricultural Research Station, Pattambi, for provid<strong>in</strong>g<br />
the facilities.<br />
Table 2. Segregation for pollen fertility restoration <strong>in</strong> the F 2 and testcross progenies.<br />
Plants Fertility class a<br />
Cross studied Genetic χ 2 P<br />
(no.) F PF S ratio<br />
IR58025A/IR36 362 272 64 20 12:3:1 0.99 0.80<br />
BC 1 126 65 30 31 2:1:1 0.14 0.99<br />
IR58025A/Mahsuri 396 300 70 26 12:3:1 0.29 0.96<br />
BC 1 192 93 49 50 2:1:1 0.10 0.99<br />
IR58025A/KAU9412-8-1 460 264 166 30 9:6:1 0.40 0.93<br />
BC 1 164 40 86 36 1:2:1 0.83 0.76<br />
IR58025A/PTB46 402 – 296 106 3:1 0.40 0.93<br />
BC 1 178 2 96 80 1:1 1.96 0.60<br />
IR58025A/PTB50 384 60 240 84 9:6:1 326.7** 0.60<br />
(1.69) b<br />
BC 1 162 20 84 58 1:2:1 18.05** 0.96<br />
(0.23) c<br />
IR58025A/PTB53 484 70 320 94 9:6:1 390.9** 0.96<br />
(0.26) b<br />
BC 1 146 15 77 54 1:2:1 21.27** 0.80<br />
(0.81) c<br />
a F = fertile, PF = partially fertile, S = sterile. b χ 2 for 9:42:13. c χ 2 for 1:4:3.<br />
Table 3. Segregation for pericarp color <strong>in</strong> the F 2 and testcross progenies of fully restored<br />
comb<strong>in</strong>ations.<br />
Plants Pericarp color a Genetic Probability<br />
Cross studied ratio χ 2 (P)<br />
(no.) R LR W<br />
IR58025A/KAU9412-8-1 430 – 320 110 3:1 0.11 0.99<br />
IR58025A/PTB50 306 216 – 90 3:1 3.17 0.30<br />
IR58025A/PTB53 390 280 – 110 3:1 2.13 0.49<br />
a R = dark red, LR = light red, W = white.<br />
66 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
Table 4. Jo<strong>in</strong>t segregation for fertility and pericarp color <strong>in</strong> the F 2 progenies of three comb<strong>in</strong>ations <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g IR58025A and pollen<br />
parents KAU94-12-8-1, PTB50, and PTB53.<br />
Plants belong<strong>in</strong>g to each class a (no.)<br />
Plants<br />
Probability<br />
Cross studied Fertile Partially fertile Sterile Genetic ratio χ 2 (P)<br />
(no.)<br />
R LR W R LR W<br />
IR58025A/KAU9412-8-1 46 – 180 84 – 104 62 30 27:9:18:6:4 20.08 **<br />
IR58025A/PTB50 364 – – 60 214 – 38 84 27:9:18:6:4 391.5**<br />
9:36:6:13 1.25 ns 0.85<br />
IR58025A/PTB53 484 – – 70 270 – 50 94 27:9:18:6:4 511.89**<br />
9:36:6:13 0.17 ns 0.99<br />
a R = red, LR = light red, W = white.<br />
Genetic analysis of morphological and related<br />
taxonomic traits <strong>in</strong> rice<br />
Qian Qian, He P<strong>in</strong>g, Zheng Xianwu, Chen Y<strong>in</strong>g, and Zhu Lihuang<br />
A doubled-haploid (DH) population derived from anther culture of an <strong>in</strong>dica-japonica F 1<br />
hybrid from the cross<br />
ZYQ8/JX17 was used. Quantitative trait loci (QTL) for morphological traits were <strong>in</strong>vestigated <strong>in</strong> 121 DH l<strong>in</strong>es. Two<br />
major QTLs for leaf hair<strong>in</strong>ess (LH), three QTLs for length/width of gra<strong>in</strong> (L/W), one QTL for color of hull when<br />
head<strong>in</strong>g (CHH), one QTL for hair<strong>in</strong>ess of hull (HH), two QTLs for length of the first and second panicle <strong>in</strong>ternode<br />
(LPI), and one major QTL and two m<strong>in</strong>or QTLs for phenol reaction (PH) were detected. Four QTLs for morphological<br />
<strong>in</strong>dex (MI) were also identified on chromosomes 1, 3, 4, and 6. Three of them, which were on chromosomes<br />
1, 3, and 6, were found <strong>in</strong> the same chromosome regions where some QTLs for related taxonomic traits were<br />
located.<br />
Two thousand years ago, the Ch<strong>in</strong>ese realized that rice could<br />
be classified <strong>in</strong>to <strong>in</strong>dica and japonica. Kato et al (1928) were<br />
the first to differentiate the two types of rice <strong>in</strong>to <strong>in</strong>dica and<br />
japonica. S<strong>in</strong>ce then, many researchers have studied the classification<br />
and differentiation of <strong>in</strong>dica/japonica. Oka (1958)<br />
evaluated the reliability of classify<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dica or japonica by<br />
gra<strong>in</strong> shape, hair<strong>in</strong>ess of hull (HH), hair<strong>in</strong>ess of leaf (LH), and<br />
reaction to phenol (PH) and potassium hypochlorite. Cheng et<br />
al (1984) found that many microdifferences exist between <strong>in</strong>dica<br />
and japonica, and formulated a method of morphological<br />
<strong>in</strong>dex<strong>in</strong>g. This method for identify<strong>in</strong>g multicharacters has been<br />
widely used <strong>in</strong> classify<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dica or japonica and <strong>in</strong> hybrid<br />
breed<strong>in</strong>g between subspecies because it is simple, rapid, and<br />
reliable (Zhou et al 1988).<br />
Because the morphological <strong>in</strong>dices and related taxonomic<br />
traits were studied as a whole <strong>in</strong> this method, it was difficult to<br />
identify the effect of a s<strong>in</strong>gle gene and chromosome region<br />
related to the gene by us<strong>in</strong>g the traditional genetic method,<br />
and even more difficult to locate the accurate position of the<br />
related loci on the chromosome. To f<strong>in</strong>d the molecular basis<br />
for classify<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dica/japonica, a doubled-haploid (DH) population<br />
derived from anther culture of ZYQ 8/JX 17, a typical<br />
<strong>in</strong>dica and japonica hybrid, and its molecular l<strong>in</strong>kage map were<br />
used <strong>in</strong> genetic analysis and QTL location for morphological<br />
and related taxonomic traits.<br />
Materials and methods<br />
A typical <strong>in</strong>dica variety (ZYQ 8) and a typical japonica variety<br />
(JX 17) were used as parents for cross<strong>in</strong>g. More than 150<br />
pure DH l<strong>in</strong>es were obta<strong>in</strong>ed after anther culture of F 1 hybrids.<br />
Of these, 121 were selected for study.<br />
The experiment was conducted on the farm of Academia<br />
S<strong>in</strong>ica, Beij<strong>in</strong>g. For each DH l<strong>in</strong>e, two rows with 20 plants<br />
each were sown, and one row for each parent was planted as a<br />
check for every 10 l<strong>in</strong>es. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to Wang et al (1987), leaf<br />
hair<strong>in</strong>ess, hair<strong>in</strong>ess of hull, color of hull when head<strong>in</strong>g (CHH),<br />
length of the first and second panicle <strong>in</strong>ternode (LPI), and<br />
length/width of gra<strong>in</strong> (L/W) were recorded <strong>in</strong> the field and<br />
phenol reaction was determ<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> the laboratory. The traits<br />
were evaluated and calculated accord<strong>in</strong>g to a 0–4 scale.<br />
Based on the constructed l<strong>in</strong>kage map of the DH population,<br />
<strong>in</strong>terval QTL mapp<strong>in</strong>g was used to analyze the QTLs<br />
for morphological <strong>in</strong>dex (MI), LH, CHH, LPI, L/W, and PH<br />
by us<strong>in</strong>g the software Mapmaker/QTL. The presence of QTLs<br />
was determ<strong>in</strong>ed with a threshold LOD score of 2.0. The varia-<br />
<strong>Genetics</strong> and breed<strong>in</strong>g of agronomic traits 67
Table 1. QTLs a for morphological <strong>in</strong>dex and six taxonomic traits.<br />
Traits Locus Chromosome Marker LOD Variation Additive<br />
<strong>in</strong>terval score (%) effect<br />
Morphological qMI-1 1 CT380A-GA594 5.05 19.8 3.40<br />
<strong>in</strong>dex qMI-3 3 C746-GA505 2.21 10.2 2.44<br />
qMI-4 4 C513-G271 2.16 13.4 2.86<br />
qMI-6 6 G1314B-GA216 3.74 17.1 3.16<br />
Leaf hair<strong>in</strong>ess qLH-6a 6 G1314B-K9D2D7D 20.38 40.0 3.26<br />
qLH-6b 6 K9D2D7D-GA216 33.83 58.2 3.56<br />
Color of hull qCHH-1 1 GA594-R210 4.95 18.2 0.92<br />
when head<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Hair<strong>in</strong>ess of hull QHH-6 6 RG433-G342 2.15 14.5 –0.67<br />
Length of the first and qLPI-1 1 RG541-RG101 2.76 10.2 0.62<br />
second panicle <strong>in</strong>ternode qLPI-3 3 C746-CA5 3.11 16.4 0.79<br />
qLWR-1 1 R210-CT44 2.61 9.7 0.54<br />
Length/width of gra<strong>in</strong> qLWR-2 2 GA120-G35 4.61 18.3 0.74<br />
qLWR-3 3 C63-CT125 3.65 13.4 0.64<br />
Phenol reaction qPH-1 1 R210-CT441 3.51 14.9 1.41<br />
qPH-4a 4 G177-CT206 37.63 94.6 3.54<br />
qPH-4b 4 CT404-CT500 7.65 29.5 1.98<br />
a QTL nomenclature followed that of McCouch et al (1997).<br />
tion and additive effect of each QTL for relative characters<br />
were also calculated. QTL nomenclature followed that of<br />
McCouch et al (1997).<br />
Results and discussion<br />
Performance of Cheng’s <strong>in</strong>dex and taxonomic traits<br />
<strong>in</strong> the DH population<br />
ZYQ 8 and JX 17 are popular <strong>in</strong> South and North Ch<strong>in</strong>a. Accord<strong>in</strong>g<br />
to Cheng’s <strong>in</strong>dex and its related taxonomic traits, the<br />
female parent ZYQ 8 is a typical <strong>in</strong>dica variety with an <strong>in</strong>dex<br />
of 4, whereas the male parent JX 17 is a typical japonica variety<br />
with an <strong>in</strong>dex of 21. The morphological <strong>in</strong>dices of 121 DH<br />
l<strong>in</strong>es fell <strong>in</strong> a normal distribution. The <strong>in</strong>dica (<strong>in</strong>dex: 4–8) and<br />
japonica l<strong>in</strong>es (<strong>in</strong>dex: 18–22) both accounted for 14%, <strong>in</strong>dicacl<strong>in</strong>e<br />
(<strong>in</strong>dex: 9–13) and japonica-cl<strong>in</strong>e (<strong>in</strong>dex: 14–17) l<strong>in</strong>es<br />
accounted for 38% and 33.9%, respectively. The distribution<br />
of CHH, LPI, and L/W was cont<strong>in</strong>uous, with several transgressive<br />
types for every characteristic, whereas LH, HH, and<br />
PH showed a bimodal distribution.<br />
QTL detection<br />
A rice restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) l<strong>in</strong>kage<br />
map was constructed by us<strong>in</strong>g this DH population; 243<br />
markers were evenly distributed over all 12 rice chromosomes.<br />
Table 1 shows the results of QTL detection of morphological<br />
and related taxonomic traits from 121 DH l<strong>in</strong>es. Two major<br />
QTLs for LH were found on chromosome 6, account<strong>in</strong>g for<br />
40.0% and 58.2% variation. One QTL for CHH (qCHH-1)<br />
expla<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g 18.2% of the variation and positive additive effects<br />
was located on chromosome 1. One QTL (qHH-6) for HH<br />
expla<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g 14.5% of the variation and negative additive effects<br />
from ZYQ 8 was identified on chromosome 6. Three<br />
QTLs (qLWR-1, qLWR-2, and qLWR-3) for L/W were located<br />
on chromosomes 1, 2, and 3, respectively. For PH, one<br />
major QTL (qPH-4a) on chromosome 4 and two m<strong>in</strong>or QTLs<br />
(qPH-1 and qPH-4b) on chromosomes l and 4, respectively,<br />
were identified. They all expla<strong>in</strong>ed positive additive effects.<br />
The major QTL qPH-4a, located on chromosome 4, expla<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
a high variation of 94.6%. Two other QTLs (qPH-1 and qPH-<br />
4b) located on chromosomes 1 and 4, respectively, expla<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
14.9% and 29.5%. Four QTLs for MI, expla<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g 60.5% of<br />
the variation and positive additive effects from JX 17, were<br />
identified on chromosomes 1, 3, 4, and 6.<br />
QTLs qMI-1, qPH-1, qL/W-1, and qCHH-1 were almost<br />
<strong>in</strong> the same region on chromosome 1; qMI-3 and qLPI-3 were<br />
<strong>in</strong> the same region on chromosome 3; and qMI-6 and qLH-6b<br />
were also <strong>in</strong> the same region on chromosome 6.<br />
Results showed that heredity concerned with the classification<br />
of <strong>in</strong>dica or japonica was ma<strong>in</strong>ly controlled by m<strong>in</strong>or<br />
genes. Four QTLs for Cheng’s <strong>in</strong>dex located <strong>in</strong> this study were<br />
distributed on four different chromosomes. They were all related<br />
to some QTLs for taxonomic traits.<br />
In this study, two major genes for LH were adjacent on<br />
chromosome 6. K<strong>in</strong>oshita and Takahashi (1968) found that two<br />
dom<strong>in</strong>ant genes controlled LH. HL-a was located on chromosome<br />
6 us<strong>in</strong>g the marker gene method. PH has a bimodal distribution<br />
and a major gene was located on chromosome 4.<br />
Another two m<strong>in</strong>or genes for PH with a LOD score of 7.65 on<br />
chromosome 4 and 3.51 on chromosome 1 were also detected.<br />
Except for the related taxonomic traits of Cheng’s <strong>in</strong>dex,<br />
significant differences <strong>in</strong> other traits exist between <strong>in</strong>dica<br />
and japonica. By us<strong>in</strong>g a DH population, Qian et al (1999)<br />
located the QTLs for cold tolerance. A m<strong>in</strong>or gene related to<br />
green plantlet differentiation frequency and green plantlet yield<br />
frequency was <strong>in</strong> the same <strong>in</strong>terval of RG541-RG101 on chromosome<br />
1 as the m<strong>in</strong>or gene for LPI. A m<strong>in</strong>or gene for callus<br />
<strong>in</strong>duction frequency, a m<strong>in</strong>or gene for Cheng’s <strong>in</strong>dex, and two<br />
68 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
major genes for LH were all <strong>in</strong> the same or adjacent <strong>in</strong>terval<br />
of G1314B-K9D2D7D on chromosome 6. Among the four<br />
QTLs, one was <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>terval of C63-CT125 on chromosome<br />
3 as was the QTL for L/W. The other three were tightly l<strong>in</strong>ked<br />
with the QTL for LPI on chromosome 1, for L/W on chromosome<br />
2, and for Cheng’s <strong>in</strong>dex on chromosome 4 (Qian et al<br />
1999). Anther culture response and cold tolerance were also<br />
related to the differentiation of <strong>in</strong>dica or japonica.<br />
References<br />
Cheng KS, Zhou JW, Lu YX, Luo J, Hang NW, Liu GR. 1984. Studies<br />
on the <strong>in</strong>digenous rice <strong>in</strong> Yunnan and their utilization: a<br />
revised classification of Asian culture rice. Acta Agron. S<strong>in</strong>.<br />
10(4):271-280.<br />
Kato S, Kosaka H, Hara S. 1928. On the aff<strong>in</strong>ity of rice varieties as<br />
shown by fertility of hybrid plants. Rep. Bull. Sci. Fac. Agric.<br />
Kyushu Univ. 3:132-147(J).<br />
K<strong>in</strong>oshita T, Takahashi M. 1968. A supplementary report on genes<br />
responsible for pubescence of glumes and leaves <strong>in</strong> rice plants.<br />
XXXII Memoirs Fac. Agric. Hokkaido Univ. 6:364-370(J).<br />
McCouch SR, Cho YG, Yano M, Paul E, Bl<strong>in</strong>strub M, Morishima<br />
H, K<strong>in</strong>oshita T. 1997. Report on QTL nomenclature. <strong>Rice</strong><br />
Genet. Newsl. 14:11-13.<br />
Oka HI. 1958. Variation and classification of cultivated rice. Ind. J.<br />
Genet. Plant Breed. 18:79-89.<br />
Qian Q, Zeng DL, He P, Zheng XW, Chen Y, Zhu LH. 1999. The<br />
QTL analysis of seedl<strong>in</strong>g cold tolerance <strong>in</strong> a double haploid<br />
population derived from anther culture of hybrid of <strong>in</strong>dica/<br />
japonica. Ch<strong>in</strong>. Sci. Bull. 44(22):2402-2407.<br />
Wang XK, Cheng KS, Wang NW, Luo J, Lu YX, Liu GR. 1987.<br />
Study on two important rice types concern<strong>in</strong>g the orig<strong>in</strong> and<br />
differentiation of Asian cultivated rice. Acta Genet. S<strong>in</strong>.<br />
14(4):262-270.<br />
Zhou H, Glaszmann JC, Cheng KS, Shi XQ. 1988. A comparison of<br />
methods <strong>in</strong> classification of cultivated rice. Ch<strong>in</strong>. J. <strong>Rice</strong> Sci.<br />
2(1):1-7.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ addresses: Qian Qian, He P<strong>in</strong>g, Zheng Xianwu, Chen Y<strong>in</strong>g,<br />
and Zhu Lihuang, Institute of <strong>Genetics</strong>, Ch<strong>in</strong>ese Academy of<br />
Sciences, Beij<strong>in</strong>g 100101; Qian Qian, Ch<strong>in</strong>a National <strong>Rice</strong><br />
Research Institute, Hangzhou 310006, Ch<strong>in</strong>a.<br />
Performance of backcrossed doubled-haploid l<strong>in</strong>es of rice<br />
under contrast<strong>in</strong>g moisture regimes: root system and gra<strong>in</strong><br />
yield components<br />
M. Toorchi, H.E. Shashidhar, and S. Hittalmani<br />
BC 1<br />
F 1<br />
plants <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g n<strong>in</strong>e transgressant doubled-haploid l<strong>in</strong>es from an IR64 × Azucena mapp<strong>in</strong>g population<br />
along with parents and checks were evaluated for root morphology and yield-related characters under contrast<strong>in</strong>g<br />
moisture regimes. True backcrossed plants were identified us<strong>in</strong>g RAPD markers. Marked genotypic differences<br />
were observed across three sampl<strong>in</strong>gs by <strong>in</strong>dividual as well as comb<strong>in</strong>ed ANOVA. Significant G × E<br />
<strong>in</strong>teraction was observed for the traits studied. In sampl<strong>in</strong>g at 80 d after sow<strong>in</strong>g and at harvest, root-to-shoot dry<br />
weight ratio exhibited a significant <strong>in</strong>crease under severe low-moisture stress conditions. Gra<strong>in</strong> yield showed the<br />
most reduction (28%) under severe stress conditions. Multiple regression revealed total dry weight to be the<br />
most significant variable under well-watered conditions, expla<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g up to 30% of the variability <strong>in</strong> gra<strong>in</strong> yield,<br />
whereas, under severe stress conditions, root dry weight expla<strong>in</strong>ed 20% of the variability <strong>in</strong> gra<strong>in</strong> yield. The<br />
<strong>in</strong>fluence of the root system on gra<strong>in</strong> yield was quantified us<strong>in</strong>g canonical correlation. Among the n<strong>in</strong>e backcrosses<br />
studied, P331 × IR64 and P124 × IR64 were selected to identify near-isogenic l<strong>in</strong>es (NILs) for f<strong>in</strong>emapp<strong>in</strong>g<br />
of QTLs for root morphological characters. Selection for develop<strong>in</strong>g NILs was based on performance of<br />
the backcrosses <strong>in</strong> terms of maximum root length and gra<strong>in</strong> yield under both well-watered and low-moisture<br />
stress conditions.<br />
Root morphology and stress-<strong>in</strong>duced response form important<br />
components of drought tolerance <strong>in</strong> rice. Among root traits,<br />
maximum root length, root diameter, and root-to-shoot dry<br />
weight ratio were found to be associated with drought tolerance<br />
<strong>in</strong> upland conditions (O’Toole and Soemartono 1981).<br />
Shoot growth has been shown to be more <strong>in</strong>hibited than root<br />
growth when soil water was limit<strong>in</strong>g. This differential response/<br />
sensitivity of root and shoot growth to low water potential has<br />
been considered as a means of avoid<strong>in</strong>g excessive dehydration<br />
(Hemamal<strong>in</strong>i et al 2000). Increased root:shoot ratio and<br />
high total root length enable plants to ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> relatively high<br />
water uptake (rates) under water-stress conditions.<br />
Despite ample genetic variation for many root-related<br />
parameters, genetic improvement of root characteristics <strong>in</strong> rice<br />
us<strong>in</strong>g conventional selection has been difficult (Ekanayake et<br />
al 1985). Molecular markers have enabled the dissection of<br />
complex traits. As a prelude to develop<strong>in</strong>g near-isogenic l<strong>in</strong>es<br />
(NILs) for specific components of root morphological traits<br />
<strong>Genetics</strong> and breed<strong>in</strong>g of agronomic traits 69
<strong>in</strong> rice and to assess<strong>in</strong>g their effects on gra<strong>in</strong> yield (GY) and<br />
its components, we produced n<strong>in</strong>e backcross populations <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g<br />
doubled-haploid (DH) l<strong>in</strong>es. The objectives were to<br />
quantify root morphological characters and their <strong>in</strong>fluence on<br />
GY components at three developmental stages <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g lowmoisture<br />
stress dur<strong>in</strong>g the peak vegetative stage.<br />
Materials and methods<br />
Five deep-rooted and four shallow-rooted transgressant l<strong>in</strong>es<br />
chosen from the DH mapp<strong>in</strong>g population of IR64/Azucena<br />
were backcrossed to IR64. The n<strong>in</strong>e BC 1 F 1 s, their parents (n<strong>in</strong>e<br />
DH l<strong>in</strong>es and IR64), Azucena, Moroberekan, IR20, CO39, and<br />
Jaya constituted the materials for this study. To identify true<br />
backcrosses, DNA from the parents and all BC 1 F 1 plants was<br />
extracted us<strong>in</strong>g the m<strong>in</strong>iprep protocol.<br />
Twenty-four genotypes were grown <strong>in</strong> 1-m-long polyv<strong>in</strong>yl<br />
chloride cyl<strong>in</strong>ders <strong>in</strong> a randomized complete block design<br />
with 10 replications. Two moisture regimes—well-watered<br />
(WW) and severe stress (SS)—were imposed. In the WW condition,<br />
all the entries were watered daily throughout the cropp<strong>in</strong>g<br />
period. In the SS treatment, moisture stress was imposed<br />
from 65 d after sow<strong>in</strong>g (DAS) up to 80 DAS by withhold<strong>in</strong>g<br />
irrigation and prevent<strong>in</strong>g ra<strong>in</strong>water us<strong>in</strong>g a ra<strong>in</strong>out shelter.<br />
Sampl<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> both WW and SS conditions was done at three<br />
stages: (1) at 65 DAS (before imposition of stress) for two<br />
randomly selected replications, (2) at 80 DAS (when stress<br />
was relieved) for four randomly selected replications, and (3)<br />
at maturity for the rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g four replications.<br />
Observations comprised maximum root length (MRL)<br />
<strong>in</strong> cm, number of roots (RN), root dry weight (RDW) <strong>in</strong> g,<br />
shoot dry weight (SDW) <strong>in</strong> g, root:shoot dry weight ratio<br />
(RDW/SDW), and total dry weight (RDW + SDW; TDW) <strong>in</strong><br />
g. Further, root volume <strong>in</strong> cc (RV), root thickness at the crown<br />
region measured <strong>in</strong> mm (RT), and root:shoot length ratio (MRL/<br />
PH) were computed at the third sampl<strong>in</strong>g. At harvest, observations<br />
on gra<strong>in</strong> yield plant –1 (GY), panicle length <strong>in</strong> cm (PL),<br />
panicle number (PN), tiller number (TN), 200-seed weight <strong>in</strong><br />
g (SW), plant height <strong>in</strong> cm (PH), days to 50% flower<strong>in</strong>g (DF),<br />
chaff<strong>in</strong>ess percent (Ch), and harvest <strong>in</strong>dex percent (HI) were<br />
recorded or computed.<br />
Individual and comb<strong>in</strong>ed ANOVA over two moisture<br />
regimes us<strong>in</strong>g SAS (SAS Institute, Inc. 1989) was done.<br />
Stepwise multiple l<strong>in</strong>ear regression and canonical correlation<br />
for root and yield-related characters considered as two sets of<br />
variables were computed us<strong>in</strong>g PROC REG and PROC<br />
CANCORR, respectively.<br />
Results and discussion<br />
Random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) markers were<br />
used for dist<strong>in</strong>guish<strong>in</strong>g true BC 1 F 1 plants based on male-specific<br />
bands. Highly significant genotypic differences were observed<br />
for all the characters across sampl<strong>in</strong>gs. In the 80 DAS<br />
sampl<strong>in</strong>g, RDW, SDW, and TDW were significantly reduced<br />
for SS compared with WW, whereas MRL and RN rema<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
unchanged and the RDW/SDW ratio <strong>in</strong>creased from 0.82<br />
(WW) to 1.01 (SS). Under stress, Sharp et al (1988) reported<br />
a greater reduction <strong>in</strong> SDW than <strong>in</strong> RDW as well as an <strong>in</strong>crease<br />
<strong>in</strong> the RDW/SDW ratio <strong>in</strong> maize. At 80 DAS, backcrosses<br />
<strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g P192, P210, P331, and P124 showed a significant<br />
<strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> RDW under SS. Not all of these showed<br />
significant reductions <strong>in</strong> SDW, although the most <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g<br />
seem to be the backcrosses <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g P331 and P124.<br />
In the sampl<strong>in</strong>g done at maturity, mean values for all the<br />
characters except RN and SDW <strong>in</strong>creased significantly from<br />
WW to SS conditions. The differential <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> RDW was<br />
probably due to the effect of the enhanced rate of root elongation<br />
on alleviat<strong>in</strong>g stress 80 DAS. Backcrosses <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g P331<br />
and P333 showed significant <strong>in</strong>creases <strong>in</strong> RDW and RDW/<br />
SDW under stress. Neither of these or the backcross <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g<br />
P124 showed a significant reduction <strong>in</strong> SDW. This showed<br />
that an <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> RDW, rather than a reduction <strong>in</strong> SDW, contributes<br />
ma<strong>in</strong>ly to <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g RDW/SDW. The mean values of<br />
GY, PN, SW, PH, and HI decreased significantly under SS<br />
conditions. However, DF and Ch showed an opposite trend<br />
and contributed to a GY reduction. GY showed its maximum<br />
reduction (25.9%) under SS, signify<strong>in</strong>g the cumulative <strong>in</strong>fluence<br />
of other traits. Ribaut et al (1997) observed marked reductions<br />
<strong>in</strong> the F 3 family mean for yield-related traits from<br />
WW to SS conditions <strong>in</strong> maize.<br />
MRL was significantly and positively correlated with<br />
PL and PH, and negatively correlated with PN and TN under<br />
both WW and SS conditions. Traits related to an <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong><br />
length (PH, PL, and MRL) seem to be correlated positively to<br />
one another, suggest<strong>in</strong>g a common control of events related to<br />
cell division and elongation. The multiple regression approach<br />
showed that, under WW conditions, TDW was the most significant<br />
variable, expla<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g about 30% of the variability <strong>in</strong><br />
GY, followed by RN (17%) and MRL/PH (7%). These three<br />
characters together expla<strong>in</strong> about 53% of the variability <strong>in</strong> GY.<br />
A virtually similar trend was observed under SS conditions, <strong>in</strong><br />
which RDW as one component of TDW expla<strong>in</strong>s 20% of the<br />
variability <strong>in</strong> GY, followed by RN (8%); together, these two<br />
expla<strong>in</strong> about 28% of the variability. Mugo et al (1999) suggested<br />
that no secondary trait appeared to confer a high level<br />
of drought tolerance on its own and that a comb<strong>in</strong>ation of<br />
multiple drought-adaptive traits through a suitable <strong>in</strong>dex would<br />
be most effective <strong>in</strong> a breed<strong>in</strong>g program.<br />
Four out of the n<strong>in</strong>e possible canonical correlations between<br />
the dependent (yield components) and <strong>in</strong>dependent (rootrelated<br />
characters) set of variables were statistically significant.<br />
The standardized canonical coefficients for the criterion<br />
variables suggested that the variables GY, PH, and HI were<br />
more <strong>in</strong>fluential <strong>in</strong> form<strong>in</strong>g the first canonical variate. Standardized<br />
canonical coefficients based on X variables have given<br />
a greater and equal weight, but <strong>in</strong> a reciprocal direction, to<br />
both MRL and MRL/PH variables <strong>in</strong> the formation of the first<br />
and second canonical variates. The load<strong>in</strong>gs for the Y variables<br />
showed that PH and TN were the most <strong>in</strong>fluential variables<br />
<strong>in</strong> form<strong>in</strong>g the first and second canonical variates, respectively.<br />
The structural correlations for the X variables<br />
70 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
Standardized gra<strong>in</strong> yield<br />
A<br />
3<br />
P210 ´ IR64 P124 ´ IR64<br />
2<br />
P333 ´ IR64<br />
1<br />
P331 ´ IR64<br />
0<br />
–2.0 –1.5 –1.0 –0.5 0 0.5 1.0 1.5<br />
P442 ´ IR64<br />
P107 ´ IR64 –1<br />
P163 ´ IR64<br />
P467 ´ IR64 –2<br />
P192 ´ IR64<br />
–3<br />
Standardized maximum root length<br />
3.5<br />
3.0<br />
2.5<br />
2.0<br />
1.5<br />
1.0<br />
0.5<br />
P163 ´ IR64<br />
0.0<br />
–0.5<br />
P210 ´ IR64<br />
P333 ´ IR64–1.0<br />
P192 ´ IR64 –1.5<br />
–2.0<br />
B<br />
P331 ´ IR64<br />
P442 ´ IR64<br />
P124 ´ IR64<br />
–2.0 –1.5 –1.0 –0.5 0 0.5 1.0 2.5<br />
1.5 2.0<br />
P107 ´ IR64<br />
P487 ´ IR64<br />
Standardized maximum root length<br />
Fig. 1. The z value of gra<strong>in</strong> yield and maximum root length of n<strong>in</strong>e transgressant backcrosses <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g doubledhaploid<br />
l<strong>in</strong>es and IR64 under (A) well-watered and (B) severe water-stress conditions.<br />
Standardized gra<strong>in</strong> yield<br />
showed SDW as the most important variable <strong>in</strong> form<strong>in</strong>g both<br />
the first and second canonical variates, which were followed<br />
by both MRL and TDW <strong>in</strong> the case of the first and only TDW<br />
<strong>in</strong> the case of the second canonical variate. Consequently, the<br />
first canonical variate for Y variables represented GY obta<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
ma<strong>in</strong>ly from PH. Similarly, based on the canonical coefficients<br />
and load<strong>in</strong>gs of the predictor variables, SDW was the most<br />
<strong>in</strong>fluential variable <strong>in</strong> form<strong>in</strong>g the first and second canonical<br />
variates.<br />
In conclusion, the mean values of MRL and GY were<br />
converted to z values for comparison (Fig. 1). The two backcrosses<br />
<strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g DH l<strong>in</strong>es P124 and P331 fall <strong>in</strong> positive coord<strong>in</strong>ates<br />
and showed an advantage <strong>in</strong> gra<strong>in</strong> yield as well as<br />
MRL under both WW and SS conditions (Fig. 1). P331, a longrooted<br />
DH l<strong>in</strong>e, ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed its ability to tolerate drought even<br />
after cross<strong>in</strong>g with IR64 <strong>in</strong> such a way that its MRL <strong>in</strong>creased<br />
relatively with a GY similar to that under WW conditions.<br />
However, the backcross P124 × IR64 was stable under both<br />
conditions. These two crosses seem to be important for study<strong>in</strong>g<br />
drought tolerance and gra<strong>in</strong> yield.<br />
References<br />
Ekanayake IJ, O’Toole JC, Garrity DP, Masajo TN. 1985. Inheritance<br />
of root characters <strong>in</strong> rice and their relation to drought<br />
resistance <strong>in</strong> rice. Crop Sci. 25:927-933.<br />
Hemamal<strong>in</strong>i GS, Shashidhar HE, Hittalmani S. 2000. Molecular<br />
marker-assisted tagg<strong>in</strong>g of morphological and physiological<br />
traits under two contrast<strong>in</strong>g moisture regimes at peak vegetative<br />
stage <strong>in</strong> rice (Oryza sativa L.). Euphytica 112:69-78.<br />
Mugo SN, Banziger M, Edmeades GO. 1999. Prospects of us<strong>in</strong>g<br />
ABA <strong>in</strong> selection for drought tolerance <strong>in</strong> cereal crops. In:<br />
Molecular approaches for the genetic improvement of cereals<br />
for stable production <strong>in</strong> water-limited environments. <strong>International</strong><br />
workshop, June 1999, CIMMYT, Mexico.<br />
O’Toole JC, Soemartono. 1981. Evaluation of a simple technique<br />
for characteriz<strong>in</strong>g rice root systems <strong>in</strong> relation to drought resistance.<br />
Euphytica 30:283-290.<br />
Ribaut JM, Jiang C, Gonzales de Leon D, Edmeades GO, Hois<strong>in</strong>gton<br />
DA. 1997. Identification of quantitative trait loci under drought<br />
conditions <strong>in</strong> tropical maize. 2. Yield components and markerassisted<br />
selection strategies. Theor. Appl. Genet. 94:887-896.<br />
SAS Institute. 1989. SAS/STAT user’s guide: version 6, Vol. 2, 4th<br />
ed. Cary, N.C. (USA): SAS Institute Inc.<br />
Sharp RE, Silk WK, Hsiao TC. 1988. Growth of the maize primary<br />
root at low water potentials. I. Spatial distribution of expansive<br />
growth. Plant Physiol. 87:50-57.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ addresses: M. Toorchi, H.E. Shashidhar, Department of<br />
<strong>Genetics</strong> and Plant Breed<strong>in</strong>g, College of Agriculture, University<br />
of Agricultural Sciences, GKVK, Bangalore, 560 065,<br />
India; S. Hittalmani, Department of Agronomy, Faculty of<br />
Agriculture, Tabriz University, Tabriz, Iran; E-<br />
mail:maslab@satyam.net.<strong>in</strong>.<br />
<strong>Genetics</strong> and breed<strong>in</strong>g of agronomic traits 71
Developmental genetics of <strong>in</strong>ternodal elongation<br />
<strong>in</strong> float<strong>in</strong>g rice<br />
T. Jishi and Y. Sano<br />
The most dist<strong>in</strong>ct feature of float<strong>in</strong>g rice is its ability to elongate <strong>in</strong> response to flood<strong>in</strong>g. To exam<strong>in</strong>e this trait’s<br />
genetic basis, a float<strong>in</strong>g rice, Habiganj Deepwater 8 from Bangladesh, was <strong>in</strong>vestigated. We previously <strong>in</strong>troduced<br />
dw3 from deepwater-tolerant wild rice <strong>in</strong>to an <strong>in</strong>tolerant l<strong>in</strong>e by backcrosses. The near-isogenic l<strong>in</strong>e with<br />
dw3 (T65dw3) revealed that dw3 enables <strong>in</strong>tolerant plants to elongate their <strong>in</strong>ternodes <strong>in</strong> response to submergence,<br />
allow<strong>in</strong>g them to survive under deepwater conditions, although multigenic control of <strong>in</strong>ternode elongation<br />
had been assumed. T65dw3/HD8 F 1<br />
was backcrossed with T65dw3 and we selected a l<strong>in</strong>e (BC 2<br />
F 3<br />
) that showed<br />
elongation at an early stage under nonsubmerged conditions. The trait was found to be controlled by a dom<strong>in</strong>ant<br />
gene. When grown under submerged conditions, the l<strong>in</strong>e showed <strong>in</strong>ternode elongation at an earlier stage as well<br />
as a higher rate of elongation than did T65dw3. Histological observations revealed that the l<strong>in</strong>e formed <strong>in</strong>tercalary<br />
meristems <strong>in</strong> the lower <strong>in</strong>ternodes from the base, suggest<strong>in</strong>g that the developmental stages <strong>in</strong> the formation<br />
of <strong>in</strong>tercalary meristems play a significant role <strong>in</strong> establish<strong>in</strong>g float<strong>in</strong>g ability.<br />
Although the genetic basis of float<strong>in</strong>g ability might be complex<br />
(Morishima et al 1962), physiological studies of deepwater<br />
tolerance showed that enhanced <strong>in</strong>ternode elongation might<br />
result from the action of plant hormones as well as expansion<br />
(Rask<strong>in</strong> and Kende 1984, Cho and Kende 1997). We successfully<br />
<strong>in</strong>troduced dw3 from deepwater-tolerant wild rice <strong>in</strong>to<br />
<strong>in</strong>tolerant l<strong>in</strong>e T65 (japonica type) by backcrosses (Eiguchi et<br />
al 1993). The resultant near-isogenic l<strong>in</strong>e (NIL) with dw3<br />
(T65dw3) survived under deepwater conditions, show<strong>in</strong>g that<br />
elongation is suppressed <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>tolerant l<strong>in</strong>e. In most grass<br />
species, <strong>in</strong>ternodal elongation is driven by cell division and<br />
cell elongation <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>tercalary meristems (IM) and cell maturation<br />
with<strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>ternode is basipetal. This paper shows that<br />
developmental stages <strong>in</strong> the formation of IM also play a significant<br />
role <strong>in</strong> conferr<strong>in</strong>g float<strong>in</strong>g ability.<br />
Float<strong>in</strong>g ability <strong>in</strong> rice cultivar Habiganj Deepwater 8<br />
A deepwater rice, Habiganj Deepwater 8 (HD8 from<br />
Bangladesh), showed vigorous growth <strong>in</strong> comparison with<br />
T65dw3 under 2-m deepwater conditions. This means that a<br />
high degree of float<strong>in</strong>g ability is achieved not only by dw3.<br />
HD8 carried dw3 s<strong>in</strong>ce all F 2 plants of T65dw3/HD8 survived<br />
under submerged conditions, suggest<strong>in</strong>g that HD8 might carry<br />
additional genes for float<strong>in</strong>g ability. As reported by Inouye<br />
and Hagiwara (1981), even under air-grown conditions, HD8<br />
showed <strong>in</strong>ternode elongation earlier (the 7th or 8th <strong>in</strong>ternode<br />
from the base) than nondeepwater l<strong>in</strong>e T65.<br />
To exam<strong>in</strong>e genes for early elongation, T65dw3/HD8<br />
F 1 was backcrossed with T65dw3. A true-breed<strong>in</strong>g l<strong>in</strong>e show<strong>in</strong>g<br />
early elongated <strong>in</strong>ternode (EEI) was selected from BC 2 F 3 .<br />
EEI as well as HD8 showed <strong>in</strong>ternode elongation before floral<br />
<strong>in</strong>itiation under air-grown conditions, whereas T65dw3 and<br />
T65 did not until floral <strong>in</strong>itiation (Fig. 1A). The lowest posi-<br />
A<br />
10th<br />
9th<br />
8th<br />
10th<br />
9th<br />
10th<br />
9th<br />
B<br />
10th<br />
HD8 EEI T65dw3 T65 EEI T65dw3<br />
Fig. 1. (A) The positions of elongated <strong>in</strong>ternodes <strong>in</strong> four stra<strong>in</strong>s—<br />
HD8, EEI, T65dw3, and T65—at 10.5-leaf age under air-grown conditions.<br />
(B) The lowest position of the <strong>in</strong>tercalary meristem (shown<br />
by arrows) formed <strong>in</strong> EEI and T65dw3. The region of the <strong>in</strong>tercalary<br />
meristem was estimated from frequent cell divisions. Bars<br />
show 2.0 cm (A) and 1.0 mm (B), respectively.<br />
9th<br />
72 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
tion of the elongated <strong>in</strong>ternodes was compared among the four<br />
l<strong>in</strong>es under submerged and air-grown conditions (Table 1). The<br />
plants underwent 4-wk submergence from 5 wk after germ<strong>in</strong>ation.<br />
Elongated <strong>in</strong>ternodes were def<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> this experiment as<br />
those longer than 5 mm <strong>in</strong> length. The results showed that the<br />
9th <strong>in</strong>ternode from the base elongated <strong>in</strong> EEI, while the 11th<br />
or 12th <strong>in</strong>ternode did so <strong>in</strong> the recurrent parent (T65dw3). In<br />
contrast, the 7th or 8th <strong>in</strong>ternode elongated <strong>in</strong> HD8, suggest<strong>in</strong>g<br />
a higher degree of float<strong>in</strong>g ability. Elongated <strong>in</strong>ternodes<br />
were also observed at maturity without submerged treatments.<br />
EEI and HD8 showed elongation <strong>in</strong> the lower positions under<br />
submerged conditions, but no difference was detected <strong>in</strong><br />
T65dw3.<br />
Histological observations of <strong>in</strong>tercalary meristems<br />
In most grass species, elongation of the <strong>in</strong>ternode is a result of<br />
the activity of an IM <strong>in</strong> which cell division and cell elongation<br />
occur. Information is limited regard<strong>in</strong>g how the <strong>in</strong>itiation of<br />
the IM varies with genotype <strong>in</strong> rice. S<strong>in</strong>ce the formation of the<br />
IM is a prerequisite to elongation, the lowest <strong>in</strong>ternode with<br />
the IM was exam<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> the NIL and the parents. Tissues conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />
young <strong>in</strong>ternodes were sampled at various stages, fixed<br />
<strong>in</strong> formal<strong>in</strong> acetic acid (FAA), sectioned longitud<strong>in</strong>ally, and<br />
sta<strong>in</strong>ed by toluid<strong>in</strong>e blue. EEI and HD8 formed the IM <strong>in</strong> lower<br />
<strong>in</strong>ternodes than <strong>in</strong> T65dw3 and T65, show<strong>in</strong>g a similar tendency<br />
to achieve the lowest position of elongated <strong>in</strong>ternode<br />
Table 1. The lowest position of elongated <strong>in</strong>ternode and the formation<br />
of <strong>in</strong>tercalary meristem on the ma<strong>in</strong> culm <strong>in</strong> the NILs and the<br />
parents. a<br />
Stra<strong>in</strong><br />
Elongated <strong>in</strong>ternode<br />
Submerged<br />
Air-grown<br />
Intercalary meristem<br />
T65 Not elongated 11.9 ± 0.1 11.0 ± 0.0<br />
T65dw3 11.3 ± 0.5 11.5 ± 0.3 10.5 ± 0.6<br />
EEI 9.0 ± 0.0 10.7 ± 0.5 9.0 ± 0.0<br />
HD8 7.8 ± 0.2 9.0 ± 0.0 8.3 ± 0.5<br />
a More than five plants were exam<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> each treatment. The position of <strong>in</strong>ternodes<br />
was counted from the base. Plants underwent submergence (50 cm) <strong>in</strong> a deepwater<br />
tank from 5 to 9 wk after germ<strong>in</strong>ation. Average of water temperatures was about 20<br />
°C. Elongated <strong>in</strong>ternodes were exam<strong>in</strong>ed at maturity under air-grown conditions.<br />
under submerged conditions (Table 1). This <strong>in</strong>dicated that a<br />
response to submergence at an earlier stage <strong>in</strong> EEI resulted<br />
from the formation of the IM at an earlier stage.<br />
The genetic base for early elongated <strong>in</strong>ternode<br />
EEI was expected to carry an additional gene(s) that caused<br />
elongated <strong>in</strong>ternodes <strong>in</strong> response to submergence at an earlier<br />
stage than did T65dw3 and T65. Segregation patterns were<br />
<strong>in</strong>vestigated <strong>in</strong> a 50-cm deepwater tank. When 52 F 2 plants of<br />
EEI/T65dw3 underwent submergence, 45 had the 9th or 10th<br />
<strong>in</strong>ternode elongated, whereas the rest had the 11th <strong>in</strong>ternode<br />
elongated (Table 2). S<strong>in</strong>ce T65dw3 had an elongated 11th <strong>in</strong>ternode,<br />
the early elongated <strong>in</strong>ternode seemed to be simply<br />
<strong>in</strong>herited at a 3:1 ratio. In contrast, F 2 plants of EEI/T65 had a<br />
ratio of 9:6:1, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g plants such as T65. This implied that<br />
two dom<strong>in</strong>ant genes act<strong>in</strong>g additively were <strong>in</strong>volved and one<br />
of them was dw3. The study also <strong>in</strong>dicated that developmental<br />
stages <strong>in</strong> the formation of the IM play a significant role <strong>in</strong><br />
atta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g float<strong>in</strong>g ability as well as regulat<strong>in</strong>g biochemical processes<br />
dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>ternode elongation.<br />
References<br />
Cho H-T, Kende H. 1997. Expression of expansion genes is correlated<br />
with growth <strong>in</strong> deepwater rice. Plant Cell 9:1661-1671.<br />
Eiguchi M, Sano R, Hirano H-Y, Sano Y. 1993. Genetic and developmental<br />
bases for phenotypic plasticity <strong>in</strong> deepwater rice. J.<br />
Hered. 84:201-205.<br />
Inouye J, Hagiwara T. 1981. Effects of some environmental factors<br />
on the position of the lowest elongated <strong>in</strong>ternode of three float<strong>in</strong>g<br />
rice varieties. Jpn. J. Trop. Agric. 25:115-121.<br />
Morishima H, H<strong>in</strong>ata K, Oka HI. 1962. Float<strong>in</strong>g ability and drought<br />
resistance <strong>in</strong> wild and cultivated species of rice. Indian J.<br />
Genet. Plant Breed. 22:1-11.<br />
Rask<strong>in</strong> I, Kende H. 1984. Role of gibberell<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> the growth response<br />
of submerged deep water rice. Plant Physiol. 76:947-950.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ address: Faculty of Agriculture, Hokkaido University,<br />
Sapporo 060-8589, Japan.<br />
Table 2. Segregation for the lowest position of elongated <strong>in</strong>ternode (LPEI) under submerged<br />
conditions <strong>in</strong> F 2 populations of two crosses between EEI and T65dw3. a<br />
Cross Segregation for LPEI Fitness<br />
9th– 11th Not No. of Ratio df c 2<br />
10th elongated plants<br />
EEI × T65 34 20 3 57 9:6:1 2 0.29 ns b<br />
EEI × T65dw3 (parents) 45 7 – 52 3:1 1 3.69 ns b<br />
EEI 4 – – 4<br />
T65dw3 – 4 – 4<br />
T65 – – 4 4<br />
a All ns plants underwent submergence (50 cm deep) for 2 wk from about 8.5-leaf age. b ns = not significant.<br />
<strong>Genetics</strong> and breed<strong>in</strong>g of agronomic traits 73
Genetic divergence <strong>in</strong> photoperiod-<strong>in</strong>sensitive autumn rice<br />
germplasm of northeast India<br />
R.P. Borkakati, P. Borah, and P.C. Deka<br />
Two hundred eight photoperiod-<strong>in</strong>sensitive rice genotypes consist<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>in</strong>digenous rice germplasm of northeast<br />
India and a few improved varieties were raised as transplanted autumn rice under irrigated conditions dur<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
1998 dry season. Genetic divergence among the genotypes was analyzed us<strong>in</strong>g Mahalanobis’s D 2 statistic.<br />
Genotypes were grouped <strong>in</strong>to clusters follow<strong>in</strong>g Tocher’s method. Differences among the genotypes were significant<br />
for all seven characters studied. The wide range of D 2 values <strong>in</strong>dicated the presence of enormous diversity<br />
<strong>in</strong> the material studied. Based on genetic distances, the 208 genotypes were grouped <strong>in</strong>to 11 clusters. The<br />
pattern of distribution of genotypes was <strong>in</strong>dependent of geographical isolation. An analysis of the contribution of<br />
different characters revealed that 100-gra<strong>in</strong> weight and yield per plant contributed the highest to total divergence.<br />
The <strong>in</strong>tracluster distance varied from 1.26 (cluster III) to 2.39 (cluster VII). Maximum <strong>in</strong>tercluster divergence<br />
was observed between genotypes As 180/2 and Sattari. Cluster X showed a higher magnitude of <strong>in</strong>tercluster<br />
distance with other clusters. Clusters VI and X showed the highest divergence. Considerable variation was<br />
observed among the cluster means for various characters. Results <strong>in</strong>dicated that <strong>in</strong>tercross<strong>in</strong>g of genotypes from<br />
clusters I, V, VI, VII, IX, and X show<strong>in</strong>g a good mean performance may help to select early matur<strong>in</strong>g, dwarf, and<br />
high-yield<strong>in</strong>g recomb<strong>in</strong>ants for develop<strong>in</strong>g rice varieties for the autumn season.<br />
<strong>Rice</strong> is the pr<strong>in</strong>cipal field crop of northeast India. The <strong>in</strong>digenous<br />
rice <strong>in</strong> the region is rich <strong>in</strong> genetic diversity. However,<br />
there are few high-yield<strong>in</strong>g autumn rice varieties <strong>in</strong> the region.<br />
Hence, it is necessary to screen the available germplasm to<br />
identify suitable parents for use <strong>in</strong> hybridization to develop<br />
better varieties of transplanted autumn rice, thus <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g<br />
cropp<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>tensity and rais<strong>in</strong>g productivity <strong>in</strong> the region. Das<br />
et al (1981) evaluated some traditional and modern ahu varieties<br />
and grouped them accord<strong>in</strong>g to categorization of characters<br />
<strong>in</strong>to low, <strong>in</strong>termediate, and high levels. It is important to<br />
evaluate the available ahu rice germplasm collected from different<br />
states of northeast India s<strong>in</strong>ce it has been ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed for<br />
a long time and is a source of valuable breed<strong>in</strong>g material. This<br />
study was undertaken to evaluate 208 photoperiod-<strong>in</strong>sensitive<br />
rice genotypes for genetic divergence.<br />
Materials and methods<br />
The 208 photoperiod-<strong>in</strong>sensitive rice genotypes consisted of<br />
<strong>in</strong>digenous and improved varieties of northeast India that were<br />
classified as ahu (autumn rice). Seeds of the entries were grown<br />
<strong>in</strong> nursery beds dur<strong>in</strong>g the 1998 dry season and transplanted <strong>in</strong><br />
5-row plots. The experiment was laid out <strong>in</strong> a randomized block<br />
design with two replications. Observations on days to flower<strong>in</strong>g,<br />
days to maturity, plant height, panicle length, panicle number,<br />
100-gra<strong>in</strong> weight, and yield per plant were recorded. Five<br />
randomly selected plants per plot exclud<strong>in</strong>g border rows were<br />
used to record the observations. Analysis of variance (ANOVA)<br />
was performed for seven characters studied. The analysis of<br />
genetic divergence was determ<strong>in</strong>ed by Mahalanobis’s D 2 statistic<br />
as described by Rao (1952). Based on genetic distance,<br />
the genotypes were grouped <strong>in</strong>to 11 clusters accord<strong>in</strong>g to<br />
Tocher’s method.<br />
Results and discussion<br />
The 208 genotypes used orig<strong>in</strong>ated from various agroclimatic<br />
zones of Assam and other states of northeast India as well as<br />
improved genotypes from different parts of India, Ch<strong>in</strong>a, and<br />
the Philipp<strong>in</strong>es. Of these, 159 stocks were traditional photoperiod-<strong>in</strong>sensitive<br />
varieties and 11 genotypes were traditionaltype<br />
improved varieties developed through pure-l<strong>in</strong>e selection.<br />
Thirty-eight genotypes were improved varieties with modern<br />
plant type, which <strong>in</strong>cluded Lachit, Chilarai, Rongdoi, and<br />
Madhab developed for Assam.<br />
The ANOVA revealed highly significant differences<br />
among the genotypes for all the characters, <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g genetic<br />
diversity among the genotypes used (Table 1). Maximum variability<br />
was observed for panicle number (39.2%), followed by<br />
yield per plant (34.0%). The character days to maturity (8.4%)<br />
was found to be the least variable.<br />
The 208 genotypes used <strong>in</strong> this study were grouped <strong>in</strong>to<br />
11 clusters (Table 2). The wide range of D 2 values (0.34 to<br />
3,840.06) revealed the presence of enormous genetic diversity<br />
<strong>in</strong> the genotypes. Cluster III was the largest, with 51 genotypes,<br />
followed by cluster VIII. The genotypes of cluster I were<br />
found to be the earliest, which <strong>in</strong>cluded both traditional and<br />
improved varieties. Cluster VII had eight genotypes, two improved<br />
traditional types, and one improved variety, Jaya. Yield<br />
per plant was found to be the highest among all the clusters.<br />
Developed varieties with dwarf stature were mostly <strong>in</strong>cluded<br />
<strong>in</strong> cluster IX. Cluster X had eight genotypes that were of the<br />
late type and had the longest panicles. The pattern of distribution<br />
of genotypes <strong>in</strong>to different clusters was <strong>in</strong>dependent of<br />
geographical isolation. Similar results of genetic diversity and<br />
geographical distribution were reported for brown planthopper<br />
resistance (Rao et al 1981) and for yield components (Vairavan<br />
74 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
Table 1. Analysis of variance and phenotypic coefficient of variation (PCV) for seven<br />
characters.<br />
Character<br />
Sources of variation a<br />
Replication (1) Genotype (107) Error (107) PCV (%)<br />
Days to flower<strong>in</strong>g 143.25 165.02** 8.21 10.07<br />
Days to maturity 1,267.00 198.94** 9.83 8.39<br />
Plant height 10.00 894.39** 56.57 18.97<br />
Panicle length 4.78 12.60** 7.34 14.27<br />
Panicle number 129.95 23.83** 16.26 39.21<br />
100-gra<strong>in</strong> weight 2.59 0.20** 0.10 19.36<br />
Yield plant –1 6.47 33.15** 0.22 34.04<br />
a ** = significant at P = 0.01. Numbers <strong>in</strong> parentheses are degrees of freedom.<br />
Table 2. Distribution of 208 photoperiod-<strong>in</strong>sensitive rice genotypes <strong>in</strong> different clusters.<br />
Cluster Number of Genotypes<br />
genotypes<br />
I 14 As 313, Kathiamaya ahu, As 208, Manipuri Dumai, As 320, Koniahu, Rongadoria, Kosamoni,<br />
Lakhi, Kanua, IET 7511, Bala, Sattari, IET 9217<br />
II 10 Basantbahar, Majenichembi, Morenchemkol, Naga ahu, Saraituni, Soruranga ahu, As 491,<br />
Maibee, Begunbichi, Dimararu<br />
III 51 Ulka ahu, As 180, As 47, As 305, As 36/20, Herapoa ahu 1, Guniahu 2, As 1866-67, As<br />
36/30, Kajoli ahu 1, As 327, As 326, As 323, As 317, Sariahdooli, As 329, Ahu 2, As 66/<br />
67, Ac 313/11, Dubaichenga, Rangadoria 2, As 56/21, Kajoliahu, Poroma ahu, Malbhog<br />
ahu, Nenow ahu, Bengenagutia ahu, Kola Bengenagutia ahu, Raja ahu, Soru Kolameghi,<br />
Borkola ahu 1, Bahmori ahu, Garem ahu 2, Ikoraguni, Meghi ahu, Herapoa ahu, Kehong<br />
ahu, Borkola ahu 2, T<strong>in</strong>imohia ahu, Sarimohia ahu, Koijapori, Nilaji 1, Ch 63, Chapali,<br />
Gunidhan, Rikhojoi 1, Nilaji -2, Rangajuli, Bangaloni Tezpur, Dagaranga, Jubali<br />
IV 14 Aijuri, IR36, IR56, HFC Jorhat, Duhiguni, Gov<strong>in</strong>d, IET 6148, Ratna, Chilarai, Rongdoi, Madhab,<br />
IR60, NR 166, NR 162<br />
V 24 As 36, As 1195, As 314, As 325, As 324, Gunidhan, As 330, As 69-70, Kolagoria ahu,<br />
Goalbhog, Garupetia ahu, Kola ahu, Soholia ahu, Bengali ahu, Kola meghi, Rikhojoi ahu,<br />
Boga bengenagutia, Gubar guni, Koijapori 2, Koijapori 3, Rikhojoi 2, Pusa 2-21, Ikora guni<br />
Jorhat, Kolamanik<br />
VI 12 As 310, As 206, As 178/3, As 1196, As 289, As 36/14, Rongadoria 1, Guniahu 1, As 305/<br />
2, 64-65, Guniahu, Kal<strong>in</strong>ga III<br />
VII 8 Fapori 3, Ahu 1, Fapori 1, As 292, As 328, As 180/2, Sarimohia ahu 2, Jaya<br />
VIII 32 As 90, As 312, As 315, As 321, As777 21 C, As 36/13, As 180/4, As 195, Bangaloni, 69-<br />
70, 64-65(ahu 5), Bangaloni 3, Bair<strong>in</strong>g, Bijor 1, Bijor 2, Chidon, Chenga ahu, Cheni ahu,<br />
Bilcha ahu, Begunbishi 1, Iharsal ahu, Bongal dhari, Rongadoria, Hafa, Panjasali ahu,<br />
Boga ahu, Ahu joha, Ranga ahu, Rangajira ahu, Bogibor ahu, Laujuli, Roso<br />
IX 21 Cauvery, Krishna, Kanchi, As 490, As 192, As 489, IR58, IR9729-673, Jaibungla, Area old<br />
seed, Hasakumura, AD 8500, Pusa 593, Pusa 677, IET 6223, IET 3629, Rasi, Subhadra,<br />
Lachit, IR50, Kal<strong>in</strong>ga II<br />
X 8 Bijor 3, Podumonimahu, IR26, IR46, IR10781-143-2-3, IR30, IR8, Therru<br />
XI 14 As 1194, As 1224, As 144, As 193/1, Boga betguti, Garem ahu 1, 69-70(ahu 3), As 91/2,<br />
Koimurali, As 55, Shishemthat, Dusri ahu, Bengaloni 2, Basmati (Culture-1)<br />
el al 1973, De et al 1992, Reddy and Mohana 1992). Geographical<br />
isolation is not the only factor caus<strong>in</strong>g genetic diversity<br />
<strong>in</strong> ahu rice. S<strong>in</strong>gha et al (1991) reported that geographical<br />
diversity may not always be a useful <strong>in</strong>dex of genetic diversity<br />
<strong>in</strong> rice.<br />
The relative contribution of different characters revealed<br />
that 100-gra<strong>in</strong> weight and yield plant –1 contributed the highest<br />
to total divergence. These two characters, along with panicle<br />
length and panicle number, contributed 98.7% of the total divergence,<br />
<strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g their relative importance for genetic divergence<br />
among the genotypes under study. The <strong>in</strong>tracluster<br />
distance varied from 1.26 <strong>in</strong> cluster III to 2.39 <strong>in</strong> cluster VII<br />
(Table 3). Maximum <strong>in</strong>tercluster divergence was observed<br />
between genotypes As 180/2 and Sattari, followed by As 180<br />
and As 180/2. It was <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g to note that cluster X, which<br />
<strong>in</strong>cluded both traditional and improved genotypes, showed a<br />
higher magnitude of <strong>in</strong>tercluster divergence than other clusters.<br />
Clusters VI and X showed the highest divergence. Hence,<br />
the genotypes under these clusters can be used as parents <strong>in</strong> a<br />
cross<strong>in</strong>g program to isolate desirable segregants s<strong>in</strong>ce more<br />
<strong>Genetics</strong> and breed<strong>in</strong>g of agronomic traits 75
Table 3. Mean <strong>in</strong>tra- (<strong>in</strong> bold) and <strong>in</strong>tercluster distance (D 2 ) <strong>in</strong> 208 genotypes.<br />
Cluster I II III IV V VI VII VIII IX X XI<br />
I 1.94 4.56 2.42 4.25 2.62 2.44 3.93 4.32 2.56 6.94 4.56<br />
II 1.52 2.63 3.49 3.80 4.81 4.55 2.39 4.12 4.90 3.15<br />
III 1.26 2.99 1.35 3.21 3.14 2.20 2.56 5.10 2.86<br />
IV 1.57 3.08 4.45 2.72 2.18 2.26 3.02 3.41<br />
V 1.57 3.21 2.44 2.50 2.51 5.10 2.96<br />
VI 1.79 3.61 4.25 3.26 7.06 4.17<br />
VII 2.39 2.85 2.70 4.90 2.90<br />
VIII 1.51 3.37 3.47 2.30<br />
IX 1.56 5.07 3.63<br />
X 2.02 4.86<br />
XI 1.78<br />
Table 4. Cluster means for different characters of 208 genotypes. a<br />
Cluster Days to Days to Plant Panicle Panicle 100-gra<strong>in</strong> Yield<br />
flower<strong>in</strong>g maturity height length number weight per plant<br />
I 80.68 100.36 92.14 18.40 12.54 2.07 7.71<br />
II 99.10 128.70 124.44 22.20 8.15 1.35 6.80<br />
III 89.55 119.06 119.96 21.29 9.79 2.01 8.14<br />
IV 103.00 132.29 92.90 22.76 11.50 2.03 14.93<br />
V 87.69 117.00 124.75 21.69 11.23 2.32 10.93<br />
VI 82.08 109.33 106.43 20.24 19.74 1.88 9.38<br />
VII 90.12 120.62 121.93 21.81 13.90 2.12 19.79<br />
VIII 100.58 130.84 133.98 23.12 11.31 1.90 11.56<br />
IX 89.67 117.81 76.59 21.92 11.86 2.09 13.67<br />
X 117.12 148.62 111.13 26.42 8.94 2.27 15.04<br />
XI 89.46 119.57 137.52 26.23 11.25 1.66 14.06<br />
a Numbers <strong>in</strong> bold are maximum and m<strong>in</strong>imum mean values for a particular character.<br />
variability is expected from divergent parents.<br />
Considerable variation was observed among the cluster<br />
means for different parameters (Table 4). The early matur<strong>in</strong>g<br />
genotype with 100-d duration was grouped under cluster I.<br />
Plant height was the lowest (76.59 cm) <strong>in</strong> cluster IX. Panicle<br />
length varied from 18.40 cm (cluster I) to 26.42 cm (cluster<br />
X). Panicle number was the highest <strong>in</strong> cluster VI (19.74). Wide<br />
variation <strong>in</strong> 100-gra<strong>in</strong> weight was also observed, rang<strong>in</strong>g from<br />
1.35 g (cluster II) to 2.32 g (cluster V). The highest yield per<br />
plant was observed <strong>in</strong> cluster VII (18.79 g). These observations<br />
<strong>in</strong>dicated that <strong>in</strong>tercross<strong>in</strong>g of parents from clusters I, V,<br />
VI, VII, IX, and X with good mean performance may help to<br />
select early matur<strong>in</strong>g, dwarf, and high-yield<strong>in</strong>g recomb<strong>in</strong>ants<br />
for identify<strong>in</strong>g modern varieties. Thus, <strong>in</strong>formation will be<br />
useful for develop<strong>in</strong>g high-yield<strong>in</strong>g ahu rice varieties for Assam<br />
and the northeastern region of India for hybridization.<br />
References<br />
Das GR, Ahmed T, Battacharyya HC, Borthakur BC. 1981. J. Res.<br />
Assam Agric. Univ. 2(2):56-164.<br />
De RN, Reddy JN, Surya Rao AV, Mohanty KK. 1992. Genetic divergence<br />
<strong>in</strong> early rice under two situations. Indian J. Genet.<br />
52:225-229.<br />
Rao CR. 1952. Advanced statistical methods <strong>in</strong> biometrical research.<br />
New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc. 390 p.<br />
Rao AV, Prasad ASR, Krishna TS, Seshu DV, Sr<strong>in</strong>ivasan TE. 1981.<br />
Genetic divergence among some brown planthopper-resistant<br />
rice varieties. Indian J. Genet 41:179-185.<br />
Reddy JN, Mohana NK.1992. Divergence analysis <strong>in</strong> short-duration<br />
rice. Crop Improve. 9:34-37.<br />
S<strong>in</strong>gha PK, Chauhan VS, Prasad K, Chauhan JS. 1991. Genetic divergence<br />
<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>digenous upland rice. Indian J. Genet. 51:47-<br />
50.<br />
Vairavan S, Siddiq EA, Arunachalam V, Swam<strong>in</strong>athan MS. 1973. A<br />
study on the nature of genetic divergence <strong>in</strong> rice for Assam<br />
and Northeast Himalayas. Theor. Appl. Genet. 43:213-221.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ address: Regional Agricultural Research Station, Assam<br />
Agricultural University, Titabar 785 630, Assam, India.<br />
76 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
The relationship between number of nitrogen-fix<strong>in</strong>g<br />
rhizobacteria and growth pattern of rice varieties<br />
K. Hirano, T. Sugiyama, A. Kosugi, I. Nioh, T. Asai, and H. Nakai<br />
This study was conducted to evaluate the adaptability of rice varieties to nature farm<strong>in</strong>g. Nature farm<strong>in</strong>g refers to<br />
susta<strong>in</strong>able agriculture without the use of agricultural chemicals, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g fertilizers. Four rice varieties were<br />
grown <strong>in</strong> fields under nature and conventional (control) farm<strong>in</strong>g conditions. The number of N 2<br />
-fix<strong>in</strong>g rhizobacteria,<br />
dry matter content, and nitrogen content of the plants were measured <strong>in</strong> each growth stage. In both farm<strong>in</strong>g<br />
conditions, the number of N 2<br />
-fix<strong>in</strong>g rhizobacteria was found to be associated with the growth stage of rice <strong>in</strong><br />
relation to a change <strong>in</strong> dry matter and N content of the plants. The number of N 2<br />
-fix<strong>in</strong>g rhizobacteria <strong>in</strong> nature<br />
farm<strong>in</strong>g was higher than that <strong>in</strong> conventional farm<strong>in</strong>g. In nature farm<strong>in</strong>g, varieties with a higher number of N 2<br />
-<br />
fix<strong>in</strong>g rhizobacteria <strong>in</strong> the late growth stages showed higher gra<strong>in</strong> yields than <strong>in</strong> conventional farm<strong>in</strong>g. We suggest<br />
that varieties with a higher number of N 2<br />
-fix<strong>in</strong>g rhizobacteria <strong>in</strong> the late growth stages be used for breed<strong>in</strong>g highyield<strong>in</strong>g<br />
varieties under nature farm<strong>in</strong>g. The Japanese native J195 l<strong>in</strong>e used <strong>in</strong> this experiment may be a useful<br />
material for this purpose.<br />
The development of high-yield<strong>in</strong>g, fertilizer-responsive varieties<br />
dur<strong>in</strong>g the last few decades has brought major <strong>in</strong>creases<br />
<strong>in</strong> food production. But it has raised various environmental<br />
concerns such as erosion of soils and depletion of germplasm.<br />
In such situations, susta<strong>in</strong>able agricultural systems with a focus<br />
on environmental protection need to be developed. This<br />
study was conducted to evaluate the adaptability of rice varieties<br />
under nature farm<strong>in</strong>g, a typical example of susta<strong>in</strong>able<br />
agriculture that does not use any agricultural chemicals (Okada<br />
1953). The relationship between the function of N 2 -fix<strong>in</strong>g<br />
rhizobacteria and the growth of rice plants was determ<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
under nature and conventional (control) farm<strong>in</strong>g situations.<br />
Materials and methods<br />
Two sets of experiments were conducted. In the first set, four<br />
rice varieties (Koshihikari, Nihonmasari, J195, and J235) were<br />
grown us<strong>in</strong>g nature farm<strong>in</strong>g. In the second, Koshihikari and<br />
J195 were grown us<strong>in</strong>g conventional farm<strong>in</strong>g methods <strong>in</strong><br />
Shimada City and Yaizu City, Shizuoka Prefecture, Japan. No<br />
chemical pesticides and chemical fertilizers were used <strong>in</strong> nature<br />
farm<strong>in</strong>g (Nature Farm<strong>in</strong>g <strong>International</strong> Research Foundation<br />
1987). <strong>Rice</strong> bran (3,000 kg ha –1 ) and rape cake (1,000 kg<br />
ha –1 ) were applied as organic manure for the nature farm<strong>in</strong>g<br />
experiment <strong>in</strong> Shimada City. Rape cake (1,300 kg ha –1 ) was<br />
used as organic manure and Ch<strong>in</strong>ese milk vetch was grown<br />
and then plowed <strong>in</strong>to the soil before plant<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Yaizu City.<br />
Us<strong>in</strong>g the method described by Watanabe et al (1979), the<br />
number of N 2 -fix<strong>in</strong>g rhizobacteria on three rice plants of each<br />
variety was determ<strong>in</strong>ed at the follow<strong>in</strong>g growth stages: plant<strong>in</strong>g<br />
(1 June), tiller<strong>in</strong>g (5 July), maximum tiller<strong>in</strong>g (26 July),<br />
head<strong>in</strong>g (16 August), and maturity (16 September). Dry matter<br />
and N content were also measured <strong>in</strong> each growth stage.<br />
Gra<strong>in</strong> yield was recorded after harvest.<br />
Results and discussion<br />
The number of N 2 -fix<strong>in</strong>g rhizobacteria was found to change<br />
with the growth stage of rice varieties as it reflects changes <strong>in</strong><br />
dry matter weight and N content of the plants <strong>in</strong> both nature<br />
and conventional farm<strong>in</strong>g (Fig. 1). The varieties with a higher<br />
number of N 2 -fix<strong>in</strong>g rhizobacteria <strong>in</strong> the early growth stages<br />
(plant<strong>in</strong>g to maximum tiller<strong>in</strong>g) showed a higher <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong><br />
the ratio of dry matter weight to N content of plants <strong>in</strong> the<br />
early and late growth stages. In nature farm<strong>in</strong>g, varieties with<br />
a higher number of N 2 -fix<strong>in</strong>g rhizobacteria <strong>in</strong> the late growth<br />
stages showed higher gra<strong>in</strong> yields than those <strong>in</strong> conventional<br />
farm<strong>in</strong>g (Fig. 2, Table 1). This implies that varieties with a<br />
higher number of N 2 -fix<strong>in</strong>g rhizobacteria <strong>in</strong> the late growth<br />
stages may be used <strong>in</strong> breed<strong>in</strong>g for high yield <strong>in</strong> nature farm<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
The Japanese native J195 l<strong>in</strong>e used <strong>in</strong> this experiment<br />
showed more N 2 -fix<strong>in</strong>g rhizobacteria <strong>in</strong> the late growth stages<br />
and had a higher yield under nature-farm<strong>in</strong>g conditions.<br />
In nature farm<strong>in</strong>g, the growth stage when the number of<br />
N 2 -fix<strong>in</strong>g rhizobacteria was high differed, depend<strong>in</strong>g on location.<br />
That growth stage was early <strong>in</strong> Yaizu but late <strong>in</strong> Shimada.<br />
The reason for the different experimental results may be the<br />
k<strong>in</strong>d of organic manure used <strong>in</strong> each place. The rice bran applied<br />
<strong>in</strong> Shimada resulted <strong>in</strong> a high C/N ratio compared with<br />
that of Ch<strong>in</strong>ese milk vetch applied <strong>in</strong> Yaizu, which showed a<br />
slower effect of organic manure on the plants. It must be noted<br />
that the k<strong>in</strong>d of organic manure applied is an important factor<br />
<strong>in</strong> breed<strong>in</strong>g rice varieties adaptable to nature farm<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
References<br />
Okada M. 1953. Shizennouhou-kaisetsu. Atami (Japan): Eikousha.<br />
236 p. (In Japanese.)<br />
Watanabe I, Barraquio WL, De Guzman MR, Cabrera DA. 1979.<br />
Nitrogen-fix<strong>in</strong>g (acetylene reduction) activity and population<br />
<strong>Genetics</strong> and breed<strong>in</strong>g of agronomic traits 77
Number of N 2 -fix<strong>in</strong>g rhizobacteria (log number g –1 )<br />
Yaizu City<br />
7<br />
J195<br />
7<br />
6<br />
6<br />
5<br />
Nature farm<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Conventional farm<strong>in</strong>g<br />
5<br />
Koshihikari<br />
0 25 50 75 100 125<br />
0 25 50 75 100 125<br />
Shimada City<br />
7<br />
J195<br />
7<br />
Koshihikari<br />
6<br />
6<br />
5<br />
5<br />
0 25 50 75 100 125<br />
0 25 50 75 100 125<br />
7<br />
6<br />
5<br />
J235 7<br />
6<br />
5<br />
4<br />
4<br />
Nihonmasari<br />
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 0 20 40 60 80 100 120<br />
Days after transplant<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Fig. 1. Changes <strong>in</strong> number of N 2 -fix<strong>in</strong>g<br />
rhizobacteria with growth stage of rice<br />
varieties grown under nature and conventional<br />
farm<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
Difference <strong>in</strong> gra<strong>in</strong> yield<br />
(Nature farm<strong>in</strong>g – conventional farm<strong>in</strong>g) (kg ha –1 )<br />
76 d after transplant<strong>in</strong>g (head<strong>in</strong>g stage)<br />
400<br />
Nihonmasari<br />
200<br />
J195<br />
0<br />
–200<br />
107 d after transplant<strong>in</strong>g (maturity stage)<br />
400<br />
Nihonmasari<br />
200<br />
J195<br />
0<br />
–200<br />
–400<br />
–600<br />
–800<br />
–1,000<br />
0<br />
J235<br />
Koshihikari<br />
r = 0.894<br />
–400<br />
–600<br />
–800<br />
Koshihikari<br />
J235<br />
r = 0.930<br />
–1,000<br />
0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 0 0.5 1.0 1.5<br />
Difference <strong>in</strong> number of N 2 -fix<strong>in</strong>g rhizobacteria (nature farm<strong>in</strong>g –<br />
conventional farm<strong>in</strong>g) (log number g –1 )<br />
Fig. 2. Correlation between<br />
number of N 2 -fix<strong>in</strong>g<br />
rhizobacteria and gra<strong>in</strong> yield<br />
of rice varieties grown under<br />
nature and conventional farm<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
Table 1. Gra<strong>in</strong> yield and straw weight a of rice varieties grown under nature and conventional<br />
farm<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
Agronomic Farm<strong>in</strong>g system J195 J235 Koshihikari Nihonmasari<br />
character<br />
Gra<strong>in</strong> yield Nature 7,270 ± 52 5,560 ± 122 6,130 ± 31 4,970 ± 49<br />
(kg ha –1 ) Conventional 7,110 ± 5 6,020 ± 31 6,940 ± 53 4,770 ± 63<br />
Straw weight Nature 7,860 ± 21 5,890 ± 116 6,030 ± 41 5,870 ± 49<br />
(kg ha –1 ) Conventional 9,080 ± 20 5,960 ± 33 6,150 ± 67 5,290 ± 77<br />
Gra<strong>in</strong>-straw ratio Nature 0.92 0.93 1.03 0.84<br />
Conventional 0.78 1.01 1.14 0.91<br />
a Values show mean ± S.E.<br />
78 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
of aerobic heterotrophic nitrogen-fix<strong>in</strong>g bacteria associated<br />
with wetland rice. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 37:813-819.<br />
Nature Farm<strong>in</strong>g <strong>International</strong> Research Foundation. 1987.<br />
Shizennnouhou-gijutsufukyuu-youkou. (In Japanese.)<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ addresses: K. Hirano, The United Graduate School of Agricultural<br />
Science, Gifu University, Gifu 501-1193, Japan; T.<br />
Sugiyama, A. Kosugi, I. Nioh, T. Asai, H. Nakai, and K.<br />
Hirano, Faculty of Agriculture, Shizuoka University, Shizuoka<br />
422-8529, Japan; I. Nioh, present address: Nodai Research<br />
Institute, Tokyo University of Agriculture, Tokyo 156-8502,<br />
Japan.<br />
Genotype by environment <strong>in</strong>teraction across normal<br />
and delayed plant<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> ra<strong>in</strong>fed lowland rice environments<br />
of eastern India<br />
S. S<strong>in</strong>gh, S. Sarkarung, O.N. S<strong>in</strong>gh, R.K. S<strong>in</strong>gh, V.P. S<strong>in</strong>gh, and C.B. Pandey<br />
Genotype by environment <strong>in</strong>teraction (G × E) <strong>in</strong> ra<strong>in</strong>fed lowland rice was exam<strong>in</strong>ed us<strong>in</strong>g 4 y of data from two<br />
plant<strong>in</strong>g dates of 15 genotypes grown at eight locations dur<strong>in</strong>g 1996 to 1999. Thirty-day-old and 60-d-old<br />
seedl<strong>in</strong>gs were used for normal and delayed plant<strong>in</strong>g, respectively. G × E <strong>in</strong>teraction accounted for 32.2% of the<br />
total mean sum of squares, with environments and genotypes account<strong>in</strong>g for 62.7% and 5.1% of the variation,<br />
respectively. More than 53% of the total mean sum of squares was captured by seven genotypes and by seven<br />
environment groups. Environment groups <strong>in</strong>cluded shallow lowlands, early drought, late drought, and tolerant for<br />
cold and submergence. Group<strong>in</strong>g of genotypes could be expla<strong>in</strong>ed by their performance under these conditions.<br />
PSR1119-13-3-1 had high yield potential and performed well <strong>in</strong> all environments, whereas IR67471-8-M-1-1-<br />
1 had high yield potential <strong>in</strong> both normal and delayed plant<strong>in</strong>g conditions. Six genotypes—IR66366-7-M-1-1-1,<br />
IR67471-8-M-1-1-1, IR66876-11-M-1-1-1, IR67440-1-M-1-1-1, IR67495-M-2-1-1-1, and PSR1119-13-1—<br />
and a local check performed well under both normal and delayed plant<strong>in</strong>g conditions <strong>in</strong> the ra<strong>in</strong>fed lowland rice<br />
system. While Masodha and Cuttack are good areas for both late and normal plant<strong>in</strong>g, Ch<strong>in</strong>surah, Raipur, and<br />
Ranital are not fit for late plant<strong>in</strong>g; early varieties will be better for these locations.<br />
A large area—about 17 million ha—is grown to rice <strong>in</strong> the<br />
ra<strong>in</strong>fed lowlands of South and Southeast Asia; about 13 million<br />
ha are grown to rice <strong>in</strong> eastern India alone. Because of<br />
frequent flood and drought, crop yields are adversely affected.<br />
Early drought and flood cause delayed plant<strong>in</strong>g, result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><br />
further yield decl<strong>in</strong>es. Aside from seasonal variation, the region<br />
is characterized by high spatial heterogeneity over soil<br />
types, topographic sequences, and hydrological conditions.<br />
Genotype × environment (G × E) <strong>in</strong>teraction is therefore very<br />
high. Hence, <strong>in</strong> addition to a low yield of
Table 1. Characteristics of 15 genotypes evaluated for adaptation <strong>in</strong> 64 environments.<br />
Genotypes Code Parents Days to 50% Yield<br />
flower<strong>in</strong>g (t ha –1 )<br />
IR66876-11-M-1 G1 19 IR40931-33-1-3-2/IR55008-33-3-2-1 118 3.7<br />
IR66366-M-7-1 G2 19 KDML105/IR53519-26-4-2-1-3 129 3.7<br />
IR67471-M-8-1 G3 3 KDML105/IR49804-UBN-8-B-1-1 130 4.1<br />
IR67440-M-5-1 G4 19 CN1539/IR53479-B-45-3-2-3 131 3.9<br />
IR6745-M-2-1 G5 19 IR60290-CPA-5-1-1-1-1/IR54094-B-2-2-1-3 122 3.9<br />
PSR119-13-3-1 G6 6 IR8/Barogar 123 4.3<br />
RAU83-82-4 G7 23 IET3236/IR9890-150 121 3.6<br />
RAU79-22-1 G8 19 Pankaj/C64-117 127 3.6<br />
CN1035-60 G9 23 Pankaj/Patnai23 120 3.5<br />
CR333-10 G10 23 Jagannath/Mahsuri 130 3.6<br />
KMJ-1-17-1 G11 21 Manoharsali/IR8 129 3.5<br />
KMJ-1-19-1 G12 20 Manoharsali/IR8 121 3.2<br />
Sabita G13 21 Boyan(Selection) 130 3.4<br />
Rajshree G14 21 Jaya/Mahsuri 122 3.0<br />
Local check G15 15 Local germplasm 121 3.7<br />
Table 2. Details of test locations, plant<strong>in</strong>g dates, and yield <strong>in</strong> 64 environments, Ra<strong>in</strong>fed Lowland <strong>Rice</strong> Consortium, 1996-99.<br />
1996 1997 1998 1999<br />
Test<br />
location Code a Gmp Yield Code Gmp Yield Code Gmp Yield Code Gmp Yield<br />
code (t ha –1 ) code (t ha –1 ) code (t ha –1 ) code (t ha –1 )<br />
Normal<br />
Masodha N1 118 4.9 N17 118 5.0 N33 118 4.9 N49 118 5.0<br />
RAU N2 120 3.9 N18 112 4.4 N34 112 4.3 N50 112 4.4<br />
Titabar N3 111 4.3 N19 111 4.2 N35 111 4.3 N51 111 4.3<br />
Bhawani Patna N4 118 5.0 N20 118 5.0 N36 118 5.0 N52 118 5.2<br />
CRRI (Cuttack) N5 120 4.4 N21 120 4.5 N37 120 4.4 N53 120 4.2<br />
Ranital N6 120 4.1 N22 120 4.6 N38 120 4.2 N54 120 4.2<br />
Ch<strong>in</strong>surah N7 110 4.7 N23 110 5.0 N39 110 4.8 N55 110 4.7<br />
Raipur N8 112 4.2 N24 112 4.6 N40 120 4.2 N56 112 4.3<br />
Late<br />
Masodha D9 118 3.3 D25 118 3.4 D41 118 3.4 D57 118 3.7<br />
RAU D10 114 1.1 D26 114 1.0 D42 114 1.0 D58 114 1.1<br />
Titabar D11 111 2.8 D27 111 2.6 D43 114 2.8 D59 111 2.7<br />
Bhawani Patna D12 120 3.4 D28 118 3.3 D44 118 3.5 D60 118 3.7<br />
CRRI (Cuttack) D13 120 3.4 D29 120 3.6 D45 120 3.6 D61 120 3.6<br />
Ranital D14 114 1.4 D30 114 1.2 D46 111 1.3 D62 114 1.4<br />
Ch<strong>in</strong>surah D15 121 3.0 D31 121 3.1 D47 121 3.3 D63 121 3.4<br />
Raipur D16 121 2.8 D32 121 3.0 D48 121 3.2 D64 121 3.1<br />
a N = normal plant<strong>in</strong>g, D = delayed plant<strong>in</strong>g, Gmp = germplasm.<br />
Mean yields for the common set of 15 genotypes over<br />
64 environments were used for comb<strong>in</strong>ed analysis of variance<br />
(ANOVA). G × E <strong>in</strong>teraction was analyzed us<strong>in</strong>g pattern analysis<br />
(DeLacy et al 1996, McLaren 1996).<br />
Results and discussion<br />
On an overall mean basis, yield varied from 3.0 t ha –1 for<br />
Rajshree to 4.3 t ha –1 for PSR119-13-3-1 (Table 1). However,<br />
yield varied largely from environment to environment (Table<br />
2). Means for delayed plant<strong>in</strong>g ranged from 1.0 t ha –1 at RAU<br />
to 3.5 t ha –1 for Masodha Faizabad compared with 4.2 t ha –1 at<br />
RAU and 5.1 t ha –1 at Bhawani Patna for normal plant<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
Yield varied more among locations under delayed plant<strong>in</strong>g than<br />
under normal plant<strong>in</strong>g. For late plant<strong>in</strong>g, varietal performance<br />
was better at Masodha, Bhawani Patna, and the Cuttack <strong>Rice</strong><br />
Research Institute (CRRI) (Cuttack) than at RAU, Titabar, and<br />
Ranital. S<strong>in</strong>ce the varieties tested were medium- to late-duration<br />
types, low yield at these sites could be expla<strong>in</strong>ed by lower<br />
temperatures, which affect gra<strong>in</strong> fill<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
The ANOVA showed the largest variability because of<br />
environment (62.7%). Genotype × environment accounted for<br />
80 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
Table 3. Gra<strong>in</strong> yield (t ha –1 ) of seven genotypic groups across seven environment<br />
groups.<br />
Environment<br />
group<br />
Genotype group<br />
23 3 6 19 20 15 21<br />
Mean<br />
118 3.6 6.1 5.1 5.0 3.2 4.5 2.9 4.4<br />
120 4.3 4.4 5.0 4.4 3.4 3.4 3.3 4.0<br />
121 3.2 2.9 3.8 3.0 3.2 3.0 2.9 3.1<br />
111 4.9 3.2 3.8 3.3 4.8 3.2 3.3 3.8<br />
114 1.7 0.2 1.7 0.7 1.2 2.1 2.1 1.4<br />
110 5.0 6.6 4.4 6.0 5.0 6.0 4.5 5.3<br />
112 6.6 4.5 5.2 4.3 3.7 5.9 4.0 4.9<br />
Mean 4.2 4.0 4.1 3.8 3.5 3.4 3.3<br />
the second highest variability (32.2%), whereas the genotype<br />
was responsible for only 5.1% of the variability (Table 2). Plant<strong>in</strong>g<br />
dates played the most important role, account<strong>in</strong>g for more<br />
than 39% of the variability, followed by site effects with about<br />
16%. Among the G × E <strong>in</strong>teractions, site × genotype <strong>in</strong>teraction<br />
was the most prom<strong>in</strong>ent (16%). Courtois et al (2001) also<br />
reported high site and site × genotype <strong>in</strong>teractions <strong>in</strong> ra<strong>in</strong>fed<br />
lowlands, which could be attributed to high hydrological variability<br />
<strong>in</strong> eastern India (S<strong>in</strong>gh et al 1999).<br />
A biplot of the first two ord<strong>in</strong>ation scores for standardized<br />
gra<strong>in</strong> yield was exam<strong>in</strong>ed. Scores on the first (IPCA 1)<br />
and second PCA axes (IPCA 2) accounted for 34.1% and<br />
17.4%, respectively, of the G × E-SS. Genotypes close to the<br />
center of the biplot were considered more stable. Accord<strong>in</strong>gly,<br />
the most stable genotypes were G5, G7, G13, G14, G6, G2,<br />
and many others. In general, genotype groups 6, 19, and 21<br />
were the most stable across environments. Among the least<br />
stable groups were 20, 3, 15, and 23, with the exception of<br />
genotype group 7. These groups showed specific adaptation<br />
to particular environment groups by mapp<strong>in</strong>g far away from<br />
the center of the biplot. For example, group 20 had a positive<br />
response <strong>in</strong> environment groups 121 and 111, but a negative<br />
response <strong>in</strong> the rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g environment groups. Similarly, group<br />
3 performed better and hence showed a positive response <strong>in</strong><br />
four out of seven environment groups, with exceptionally good<br />
performance <strong>in</strong> environment group 118 (Masodha and Bhawani<br />
Patna) and 110 (Ch<strong>in</strong>surah), while it faired poorly <strong>in</strong> environment<br />
group 114. Our earlier results also showed that late- to<br />
medium-duration varieties perform equally well at these locations<br />
(S<strong>in</strong>gh and Dwivedi 1997).<br />
At the lowest fusion level, two groups were identified.<br />
The first was environment group 110, composed of normalsown<br />
Ch<strong>in</strong>surah environment which were characterized by high<br />
yields rang<strong>in</strong>g from 4.4 to 6.6 t ha –1 and a mean yield of 5.3 t<br />
ha –1 (Table 3). The second group (112) also consisted of normal-sown<br />
environments of RAU (Pusa) and Raipur. In this<br />
group, yields ranged from 3.7 to 6.6 t ha –1 , with a mean of 4.9<br />
t ha –1 . The third group (118), with a slightly higher fusion level,<br />
<strong>in</strong>cluded 15 environments, both normal and late-sown, of<br />
Masodha and Bhawani Patna. This <strong>in</strong>dicated that there were<br />
no significant differences between normal and late-planted<br />
materials over different years at these two locations. It further<br />
suggested that the breed<strong>in</strong>g l<strong>in</strong>es developed at these two locations<br />
were more or less similar. This is also the third highest<br />
yield<strong>in</strong>g group of environments, with yields rang<strong>in</strong>g from 2.9<br />
to 6.1 t ha –1 and a mean of 4.4 t ha –1 .<br />
The next three groups (111, 114, and 121) had the same<br />
level of fusion. Of these, group 111 consisted of normal and<br />
late-sown environments of Titabar, <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g no significant<br />
difference between normal and late-sown materials. Yield <strong>in</strong><br />
this group ranged from 3.2 to 4.9 t ha –1 , with a mean of 3.8 t<br />
ha –1 (Table 3). Group 114 consisted of materials from lateplanted<br />
environments of RAU and Ranital, <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g similarities<br />
between these two locations. This was the lowest yield<strong>in</strong>g<br />
group (mean yield: 1.4 t ha –1 ; yield ranged from 0.2 to 2.1<br />
t ha –1 ). Similarly, group 121 <strong>in</strong>cluded late-planted environments<br />
of Ch<strong>in</strong>surah and Raipur, show<strong>in</strong>g similarities between them.<br />
This is the second lowest yield<strong>in</strong>g group; yield ranged from<br />
2.9 to 3.8 t ha –1 . The last group (120) was as large as group<br />
118, with 15 normal and late-planted environments of CRRI<br />
and the normal-sown environments of Ranital, and normalsown<br />
and late-planted environments of RAU and Bhawani<br />
Patna.<br />
Overall, there seems to be two broad groups, one consist<strong>in</strong>g<br />
of 110, 111, 112, and 114, and the other of 118, 120,<br />
and 121. In the latter group, 118 formed a separate group from<br />
120 and 121. Based on yield data over 64 environments, the<br />
genotypes could be clustered <strong>in</strong>to seven groups at a fusion level<br />
of about 2.55 (Fig. 1). At the lowest fusion level, group 19<br />
consisted of four NDR l<strong>in</strong>es and one RAU l<strong>in</strong>e, with yields<br />
rang<strong>in</strong>g from 0.8 to 6.0 t ha –1 . Environment group 110 performed<br />
best, followed by 118. Environment group 114 fared<br />
badly, with a mean yield of 0.8 t ha –1 at RAU and Ranital <strong>in</strong><br />
late-sown conditions. The second group (20) consisted of two<br />
Titabar varieties, KMJ-1-17-1 and KMJ-1-119-1, with yields<br />
rang<strong>in</strong>g from 1.2 t ha –1 (environment 114) to 5.0 t ha –1 (environment<br />
110); the latter was under the normal-sown environment<br />
of Ch<strong>in</strong>surah. Groups 21 and 23 were at the same level<br />
of fusion (2.76).<br />
Group 21 conta<strong>in</strong>ed two well-known varieties—Sabita<br />
and Rajshree—of the lowest yield<strong>in</strong>g group (3.3 t ha –1 ). However,<br />
these two varieties gave the highest mean yield <strong>in</strong> envi-<br />
<strong>Genetics</strong> and breed<strong>in</strong>g of agronomic traits 81
Year Location Code Groups<br />
99 Masodha D57<br />
99 Bhawani Patna D60 118<br />
98 Masodha D41<br />
97 Masodha D25<br />
96 Masodha D9<br />
98 Bhawani Patna D28<br />
99 Bawani Patna D44<br />
99 Bhawani Patan N52<br />
96 Masodha N17<br />
98 Masodha N49<br />
98 Masodha N33<br />
98 Bhawani Patna N36<br />
97 Bhawani Patna N20<br />
96 Masodha N1<br />
96 Bhawani Patna N4<br />
98 Ranital N38<br />
99 Ra<strong>in</strong>tal N54 120<br />
97 CRRI N21<br />
98 CRRI N37<br />
99 CRRI N53<br />
98 Raipur N40<br />
99 CRRI D61<br />
97 CRR D29<br />
98 CRRI D45<br />
98 CRRI N5<br />
97 Ranital N22<br />
97 Bhawani Patna D12<br />
96 CRRI D13<br />
96 RAU (Pusa) N2<br />
96 Ranital N6<br />
96 Ch<strong>in</strong>surah D15<br />
99 Ch<strong>in</strong>surah D63 121<br />
97 Ch<strong>in</strong>shurah D31<br />
98 Ch<strong>in</strong>surah D47<br />
99 Raipur D16<br />
97 Raipur D32<br />
98 Raipur D48<br />
99 Raipur D64<br />
96 Titabar N3<br />
97 Titabar N19 111<br />
97 Titabar N35<br />
97 Titabar D27<br />
98 Ranital D46<br />
99 Titabar D59<br />
96 Titabar D11<br />
99 Titabar N51<br />
96 Ranital D14<br />
99 RAU (Pusa) D58 114<br />
97 RAU (Pusa) D26<br />
98 RAU (Pusa) D42<br />
96 RAU (Pusa) D10<br />
99 Ranital D62<br />
97 Ranital D30<br />
98 Ranital D46<br />
96 Ch<strong>in</strong>surah N7<br />
99 Ch<strong>in</strong>surah N55 110<br />
97 Ch<strong>in</strong>surah N23<br />
98 Ch<strong>in</strong>surah N39<br />
97 RAU (Pusa) N18<br />
97 Raipur N24 112<br />
96 Raipur N8<br />
99 Raipur N56<br />
98 RAU (Pusa) N34<br />
99 RAU (Pusa) N50<br />
–2 5 12 19 26<br />
Fusion level<br />
Fig. 1. Dendrogram for seven environment groups <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g normal and delayed plant<strong>in</strong>g<br />
conditions. N = normal plant<strong>in</strong>g, D = delayed plant<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
ronment group 21, <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g their greater stability under latesown<br />
harsh environments. Group 23 consisted of three l<strong>in</strong>es:<br />
one each from RAU, Ch<strong>in</strong>surah, and CRRI. It was the highest<br />
yield<strong>in</strong>g group (av = 4.2 t ha –1 ), with a maximum yield of 6.6<br />
t ha –1 <strong>in</strong> environment group 112 (normal-sown ra<strong>in</strong>fed, RAU),<br />
followed by group 110 (normal-sown Ch<strong>in</strong>surah: 5.0 t ha –1 ).<br />
The lowest yield of 1.7 t ha –1 <strong>in</strong> environment group 114 <strong>in</strong>dicated<br />
varietal sensitivity to delayed plant<strong>in</strong>g, particularly at<br />
Ranital and RAU. Groups 3, 6, and 15 each had one l<strong>in</strong>e. PSR<br />
1119-13-3-1 (group 6) was closer to group 19 (the NDR l<strong>in</strong>es),<br />
whereas the local check of group 15 showed proximity with<br />
group 21 (i.e., Sabita and Rajshree).<br />
Overall, there appeared to be two broad clusters, one<br />
consist<strong>in</strong>g of groups 20, 15, and 21, and another composed of<br />
groups 23, 3, 6, and 19. Generally, for normal plant<strong>in</strong>g,<br />
Ch<strong>in</strong>surah, Raipur, RAU, and Ranital proved to be the best<br />
locations. However, these were the poorest environments for<br />
delayed plant<strong>in</strong>g. For plant<strong>in</strong>g late at these locations, early<br />
varieties should be used. Areas around N.D. University of<br />
Agriculture and Technology and CRRI seem to be good for<br />
both normal and late plant<strong>in</strong>g, of course, with<strong>in</strong> a reasonable<br />
time. For poor environments, the long-tested Sabita, Rajshree,<br />
and local check proved to be better than the new test materials.<br />
Based on the overall mean, PSR119-13-3-1—a recently<br />
82 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
eleased variety—was found to be the best (4.3 t ha –1 ), followed<br />
by NDR 96005 (4.1 t ha –1 ), and NDR 96006 and NDR<br />
96007 (3.9 t ha –1 ).<br />
References<br />
Courtois B, Bartolome B, Chaudhury D, Paris T, Pigg<strong>in</strong> C, Prasad<br />
K, Sahu RK, Sarkarung S, S<strong>in</strong>gh HN, S<strong>in</strong>gh S, S<strong>in</strong>gh RK,<br />
Thakur R. 2001. Compar<strong>in</strong>g farmers’ and breeders’ rank<strong>in</strong>gs<br />
<strong>in</strong> varietal selection for low-<strong>in</strong>put environments: a case study<br />
of ra<strong>in</strong>fed rice <strong>in</strong> eastern India. Euphytica 122(3):537-550.<br />
DeLacy IH, Basford KE, Cooper M, Bull JK, McLaren CG. 1996.<br />
Analysis of multi-environment trials—a historical perspective.<br />
In: Cooper M, Hammer GL, editors. Plant adaptation<br />
and crop improvement. Wall<strong>in</strong>gford (UK): CAB <strong>International</strong>.<br />
p 39-124.<br />
<strong>IRRI</strong> (<strong>International</strong> <strong>Rice</strong> Research Institute). 1992. Challenges and<br />
opportunities <strong>in</strong> a less favorable ecosystem: ra<strong>in</strong>fed lowland<br />
rice. <strong>IRRI</strong> Information Series No. 1. Los Baños (Philipp<strong>in</strong>es):<br />
<strong>IRRI</strong>.<br />
Mackill DJ, Coffman WR, Garrity DP. 1996. Ra<strong>in</strong>fed lowland rice<br />
improvement. Manila (Philipp<strong>in</strong>es): <strong>International</strong> <strong>Rice</strong> Research<br />
Institute. 242 p.<br />
McLaren CG. 1996. A comparison between pattern analysis conducted<br />
on environment standardized data and AMMI models<br />
for analysis of data from multi-environment trials. In: Cooper<br />
M, Hammer GL, editors. Plant adaptation and crop improvement.<br />
Wall<strong>in</strong>gford (UK): CAB <strong>International</strong>. Los Baños (Philipp<strong>in</strong>es):<br />
<strong>International</strong> <strong>Rice</strong> Research Institute. Patancheru<br />
(India): <strong>International</strong> Crops Research Institute for the Semi-<br />
Arid Tropics. p 225-242.<br />
S<strong>in</strong>gh RK, Dwivedi JL. 1997. <strong>Rice</strong> improvement for ra<strong>in</strong>fed lowland<br />
ecosystem: breed<strong>in</strong>g methods and practices <strong>in</strong> eastern<br />
India. In: Fukai S, Cooper M, Salisbury J, editors. Breed<strong>in</strong>g<br />
strategies for ra<strong>in</strong>fed lowland rice <strong>in</strong> drought-prone environments.<br />
Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs of the <strong>International</strong> Workshop held at<br />
Ubon Ratchathani, Thailand. ACIAR Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs 77:50-57.<br />
S<strong>in</strong>gh S, S<strong>in</strong>gh ON, S<strong>in</strong>gh RK, Sarkarung S. 1998. A shuttle breed<strong>in</strong>g<br />
approach to rice improvement for ra<strong>in</strong>fed lowland ecosystem<br />
<strong>in</strong> eastern India. UK: James and James (Science Publishers)<br />
Ltd. p 105-115.<br />
S<strong>in</strong>gh VP, S<strong>in</strong>gh RK, Sastri ASRAS, Baghel SS, Chaudhury JL. 1999.<br />
<strong>IRRI</strong>-IGAU publication. p 76.<br />
Notes<br />
Us<strong>in</strong>g rice cultivar LGC-1 as a dietary food<br />
for patients with kidney disease<br />
M. Nishimura, N. Horisue, T. Imbe, M. Sakai, and M. Kusaba<br />
Authors’ addresses: S. S<strong>in</strong>gh, S. Sarkarung, R.K. S<strong>in</strong>gh, V.P. S<strong>in</strong>gh,<br />
<strong>International</strong> <strong>Rice</strong> Research Institute, Los Baños, Philipp<strong>in</strong>es;<br />
O.N. S<strong>in</strong>gh and C.P. Pandey, N.D. University of Agriculture<br />
and Technology, Kumarganj, Faizabad, Uttar Pradesh, India.<br />
The steep rise <strong>in</strong> medical expenses has become a public concern because of the <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> number of the<br />
elderly population. In particular, the high cost of blood dialysis is a very important consideration for patients with<br />
kidney disease. The number of patients who receive a blood dialysis is estimated to be about 15,000 persons<br />
per year. Limit<strong>in</strong>g prote<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>take is one effective treatment. A rice cultivar with a low prote<strong>in</strong> content <strong>in</strong> the<br />
endosperm is required to help as a dietary cure. The major prote<strong>in</strong>s, glutel<strong>in</strong> and prolam<strong>in</strong>, accumulate separately<br />
<strong>in</strong> two different prote<strong>in</strong> bodies. Glutel<strong>in</strong> is stored <strong>in</strong> prote<strong>in</strong> body type II (PB-II) and prolam<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> prote<strong>in</strong> body<br />
type I (PB-I). PB-I is <strong>in</strong>digestible <strong>in</strong> the human body, whereas PB-II can be easily digested. LGC-1 is a low-glutel<strong>in</strong><br />
and high-prolam<strong>in</strong> cultivar orig<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g from a rice mutant. It can be used as a low-digestible-prote<strong>in</strong> rice. This<br />
study was conducted to clarify the efficiency of LGC-1 as a ma<strong>in</strong> dietary food. Patients suffer<strong>in</strong>g from kidney<br />
disease before blood dialysis <strong>in</strong> two hospitals had 90% milled rice of LGC-1 for 6 mo. In patients who ate more<br />
LGC-1, the prote<strong>in</strong> content <strong>in</strong> the blood and the total prote<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>take decreased significantly. Moreover, the scores<br />
for 1/creat<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>e stand<strong>in</strong>g to gauge the ability of the kidney to function improved. On the other hand, <strong>in</strong> patients<br />
who ate less LGC-1, these scores did not improve. Some cultivars were developed us<strong>in</strong>g LGC-1 as a cross<br />
parent. They also had low glutel<strong>in</strong> content and thus are suitable as a low-prote<strong>in</strong> rice. From these results, we<br />
recommend cultivars with low glutel<strong>in</strong> content as a dietary food for patients with kidney disease. To use LGC-1 as<br />
a dietary food, it is important to consult a doctor or a dietitian s<strong>in</strong>ce the effectiveness of LGC-1 showed differences.<br />
In Japan, the <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g cost of medical expenses has become<br />
an important public concern. In particular, the cost of blood<br />
dialysis among elderly patients with kidney disease has<br />
emerged as an important issue. The number of new patients<br />
receiv<strong>in</strong>g blood dialysis therapy is estimated to be about 15,000<br />
per year <strong>in</strong> Japan alone. Diet therapy is based on low prote<strong>in</strong><br />
and high energy. To follow a strict diet therapy, it is necessary<br />
to use specially formulated low-prote<strong>in</strong> foods. So far,<br />
hyperpolished rice is recommended to patients to restrict their<br />
prote<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>take. However, this is quite expensive compared with<br />
ord<strong>in</strong>ary rice. Therefore, rice cultivars with genetically low<br />
prote<strong>in</strong> content <strong>in</strong> the endosperm are required for a dietary<br />
<strong>Genetics</strong> and breed<strong>in</strong>g of agronomic traits 83
NM67<br />
Nihonmasari<br />
LGC-1<br />
kDa<br />
76<br />
Reciprocal of serum creat<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>e<br />
1.0<br />
Beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g of diet therapy<br />
With diet therapy<br />
57<br />
0.5<br />
α Glutel<strong>in</strong><br />
Globul<strong>in</strong><br />
β Glutel<strong>in</strong><br />
Album<strong>in</strong><br />
Prolam<strong>in</strong><br />
37–39<br />
26<br />
22–23<br />
16<br />
13<br />
With no diet therapy<br />
0.1<br />
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15<br />
Month<br />
Fig. 2. Progression of renal failure.<br />
Table 1. Percentage of each prote<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> the milled rice of LGC-1 and Nihonmasari.<br />
Fig. 1 SDS-PAGE analysis of total prote<strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>in</strong> brown rice.<br />
Cultivar 57–76 kDa 37–39 kDa 26 kDa 22–23 kDa 16 kDa 13 kDa<br />
α Glutel<strong>in</strong> Globul<strong>in</strong> β Glutel<strong>in</strong> Album<strong>in</strong> Prolam<strong>in</strong><br />
Nihonmasari 18.5 27.3 9.8 21.3 7.7 15.4<br />
LGC-1 20.7 13.0 13.7 9.8 10.9 32.0<br />
cure. This study was conducted to clarify the efficiency of a<br />
low-glutel<strong>in</strong> cultivar, LGC-1, as a ma<strong>in</strong> dietary food.<br />
Materials and methods<br />
<strong>Rice</strong> seed prote<strong>in</strong> consists of two major prote<strong>in</strong>s, glutel<strong>in</strong> and<br />
prolam<strong>in</strong>, that accumulate separately <strong>in</strong> two different prote<strong>in</strong><br />
bodies. Glutel<strong>in</strong> is stored <strong>in</strong> prote<strong>in</strong> body type II (PB-II) and<br />
prolam<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> prote<strong>in</strong> body type I (PB-I). PB-I is <strong>in</strong>digestible <strong>in</strong><br />
the human body, whereas PB-II can be easily digested. The<br />
seed prote<strong>in</strong> of LGC-1, a derivative of the rice mutant NM67<br />
obta<strong>in</strong>ed from cv. Nihonmasari treated with ethylene-im<strong>in</strong>e,<br />
consists of low glutel<strong>in</strong> and high prolam<strong>in</strong>. Therefore, LGC-1<br />
could be made available as a low-digestible-prote<strong>in</strong> rice, although<br />
it conta<strong>in</strong>s the same amount of total prote<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> the endosperm<br />
as the orig<strong>in</strong>al cultivar (Fig. 1, Table 1).<br />
Twenty-three outpatients with chronic renal failure who<br />
had not yet undergone blood dialysis <strong>in</strong> two hospitals were<br />
placed on the low-prote<strong>in</strong> diet dur<strong>in</strong>g the prestudy period (mean<br />
of 10 mo). Subsequently, they were given the same diet us<strong>in</strong>g<br />
90% milled rice of LGC-1 as the staple food dur<strong>in</strong>g the study<br />
period (mean of 7 mo).<br />
Results and discussion<br />
Prote<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>take and the slope of the reciprocal of serum creat<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>e<br />
(a waste product of metabolism <strong>in</strong> the human body; see<br />
Fig. 2) did not differ between before and dur<strong>in</strong>g LGC-1 <strong>in</strong>take<br />
<strong>in</strong> all patients. Results showed that, among 23 patients, n<strong>in</strong>e<br />
consumed rice ma<strong>in</strong>ly as a staple food (120–180 g d –1 as polished<br />
rice = rice group). In the rice group, prote<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>take de-<br />
Table 2. Change <strong>in</strong> the slope of the serum creat<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>e<br />
reciprocal.<br />
Before<br />
1/S-Cr slope<br />
Dur<strong>in</strong>g<br />
All patients –3.10 ± 3.62 –1.69 ± 2.95<br />
<strong>Rice</strong> group –4.59 ± 4.33 –1.47 ± 3.51<br />
Nonrice group –2.05 ± 2.94 –1.82 ± 2.79<br />
creased and the slope of the reciprocal of serum creat<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>e<br />
decreased significantly dur<strong>in</strong>g the study period compared with<br />
the prestudy period. On the other hand, among patients who<br />
had less opportunity to eat LGC-1 (
Table 3. Comparison of LGC-1 and an ord<strong>in</strong>ary rice variety.<br />
Item Choices LGC-1 (90%) LGC-1 (80%)<br />
Eat<strong>in</strong>g quality 1. Tasty 30 59<br />
2. Untasty 70 41<br />
Diet therapy 1. Variable 48 77<br />
2. No change 52 23<br />
Long-term use 1. Possible 100 100<br />
2. Impossible 0 0<br />
Appetite 1. No change 96 100<br />
2. Reduced 4 0<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ addresses: M. Nishimura, M. Kusaba, Institute of Radiation<br />
Breed<strong>in</strong>g, National Institute of Agricultural Resources;<br />
N. Horisue, Tohoku National Agricultural Experiment Station;<br />
T. Imbe, M. Sakai, National Agricultural Research Center,<br />
Japan.<br />
Characterization of a rice mutant show<strong>in</strong>g<br />
an abnormal morphology<br />
T. Kawai and H. Kitano<br />
A rice recessive mutant, KA-902, show<strong>in</strong>g an abnormal morphology was <strong>in</strong>duced from M 2<br />
progenies of Taichung<br />
65 (T65) treated with N-methyl-N-nitrosourea (MNU). This mutant expressed an extremely m<strong>in</strong>iature plant phenotype<br />
<strong>in</strong> the early juvenile stage. Histological observations on shoot morphology of the mutant revealed that the<br />
cell elongation of both leaf and stem was clearly reduced although its shoot apical meristem seemed nearly<br />
normal <strong>in</strong> structure. When the wild type (T65) was germ<strong>in</strong>ated under dark condition, the shoot was greatly<br />
sp<strong>in</strong>dled. The mutant grown under such a condition was critically reduced and, moreover, the base of the shoot<br />
was swollen. Paraff<strong>in</strong> sections of the dark brown shoots showed that this swell<strong>in</strong>g of the mutant was not caused<br />
by an <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> cell number but by auxesis of the cell <strong>in</strong> the mesocotyl to the upper nodal regions. Such<br />
obvious morphological characteristics of the mutant expressed under light and dark conditions could not be<br />
corrected by gibberell<strong>in</strong> (GA 3<br />
) treatment.<br />
How do plants achieve different morphologies This is a common<br />
question of botanists. Morphologically abnormal mutants<br />
are one of the most useful tools to elucidate such genetic programs.<br />
Recent developments of molecular biology us<strong>in</strong>g a<br />
model plant, Arabidopsis thaliana, gave important <strong>in</strong>formation<br />
on many useful materials conta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> such malformed<br />
mutants. Unfortunately <strong>in</strong> rice, many mutants had been discarded<br />
due to the perceived lack of practical value <strong>in</strong> plant<br />
breed<strong>in</strong>g. We screened some mutants show<strong>in</strong>g abnormal shoot<br />
morphologies, and focused on a recessive mutant, KA-902,<br />
with an extremely m<strong>in</strong>iature plant size and an abnormal morphology<br />
<strong>in</strong> the early juvenile stage.<br />
Materials and methods<br />
We screened a recessive mutant from M 2 progenies of T65<br />
treated with MNU. KA-902 had a m<strong>in</strong>iature-sized plant phenotype<br />
<strong>in</strong> the early juvenile stage (Fig. 1). The homozygous<br />
plants of the mutant could cont<strong>in</strong>ue their growth for over 2 mo<br />
but subsequently aborted their growth. Accord<strong>in</strong>gly, phenotypic<br />
analyses of the mutants were carried out us<strong>in</strong>g progenies<br />
segregated from heterozygous plants.<br />
Seeds of KA-902 set on the heterozygous plants and T65<br />
were germ<strong>in</strong>ated and grown <strong>in</strong> growth chambers at 30 °C under<br />
cont<strong>in</strong>uous light and cont<strong>in</strong>uous dark conditions. Seedl<strong>in</strong>gs<br />
of the mutant grown under light condition were transplanted<br />
<strong>in</strong> a pot for growth analysis. Homozygous plants of KA-902<br />
and T65 at 10 d after germ<strong>in</strong>ation were fixed with FAA<br />
(formaldehyde:acetic acid:70% ethyl alcohol = 1:1:18). Longitud<strong>in</strong>al<br />
and transverse th<strong>in</strong> sections of the shoot were prepared<br />
with the paraff<strong>in</strong> section<strong>in</strong>g method. Histological observations<br />
were done on specimens sta<strong>in</strong>ed with toluid<strong>in</strong>e blue<br />
1.0% solution.<br />
Seeds of KA-902 and T65 were germ<strong>in</strong>ated and grown<br />
<strong>in</strong> 0 and 10 ppm gibberell<strong>in</strong> (GA 3 ) water solutions <strong>in</strong> the growth<br />
chamber at 30 °C under cont<strong>in</strong>uous light condition. The length<br />
of the second leaf sheath of this mutant and T65 seedl<strong>in</strong>gs<br />
were measured 14 d after germ<strong>in</strong>ation.<br />
Results<br />
Characteristics of the mutant phenotype<br />
Under light condition, the mutant was extremely small and the<br />
plant was less than 2.0 cm even 2 wk later. The root of the<br />
mutant was also shortened and seemed to be stouter compared<br />
with those of T65. Seedl<strong>in</strong>gs of the mutant cont<strong>in</strong>ued their<br />
growth for 2 mo after transplant<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the soil, but the plants<br />
aborted subsequently.<br />
Wild-type seedl<strong>in</strong>gs grown under the cont<strong>in</strong>uous dark<br />
condition were etiolated and greatly sp<strong>in</strong>dled. However, seed-<br />
<strong>Genetics</strong> and breed<strong>in</strong>g of agronomic traits 85
l<strong>in</strong>gs of the mutant grown under the same condition were etiolated<br />
but failed to elongate. Furthermore, the base of the shoot<br />
was extremely swollen.<br />
Histological observation<br />
Cell elongation of both leaf and stem was critically reduced<br />
although the shoot apical meristem and differentiation of the<br />
leaf primordia seemed nearly normal.<br />
The longitud<strong>in</strong>al section of the mutant revealed that the<br />
upper regions of the mesocotyl and first <strong>in</strong>ternode were swollen.<br />
Transverse sections showed that this swell<strong>in</strong>g of the<br />
mesocotyl <strong>in</strong> the mutant was caused by enlargement of cells<br />
s<strong>in</strong>ce lateral cell numbers from the vascular bundle to the epidermal<br />
layer between the mutant and wild type were not significantly<br />
different. The epidermis of the mesocotyl and vascular<br />
bundle showed an abnormal morphology <strong>in</strong> the mutant.<br />
The second leaf sheath of the mutant treated with 10<br />
ppm GA 3 hardly elongated. The plant height of the mutant did<br />
not recover, unlike the wild type, which grew normally.<br />
Discussion<br />
Swell<strong>in</strong>g was observed <strong>in</strong> the basal shoot of the mutant grown<br />
under dark condition. This swell<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>in</strong>duced by shield<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
light, was caused by auxesis of cells <strong>in</strong> the basal region of the<br />
shoot. The Bri1 mutant <strong>in</strong> Arabidopsis thaliana, which is a<br />
brass<strong>in</strong>osteroid-<strong>in</strong>sensitive mutant, shows a remarkable feature<br />
of photomorphogenesis (deetiolation) under dark condition<br />
(Clouse et al 1996). Recently, a homologous mutant of<br />
Bri1 <strong>in</strong> Arabidopsis was found <strong>in</strong> rice (Yamamuro et al 2000).<br />
The shoot of this mutant (d61, osbri1) failed to elongate under<br />
dark condition and did not swell as KA-902 did under dark<br />
condition.<br />
The Ctr1 mutant <strong>in</strong> A. thaliana constitutively exhibits<br />
an abnormal phenotype under both light and dark conditions.<br />
The abnormal phenotype under dark condition had triple responses—<strong>in</strong>hibition<br />
of root and hypocotyl elongation, tighten<strong>in</strong>g<br />
of the apical hook, and swell<strong>in</strong>g of the hypocotyl as shown<br />
<strong>in</strong> the wild-type plants treated with ethylene (Kieber et al 1993).<br />
This phenotype of the mutant is similar to KA-902 <strong>in</strong> root and<br />
hypocotyl response. However, a rice plant treated with ethylene<br />
did not respond like the dicot.<br />
The gene function of the mutant exam<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> this study<br />
is still obscure. Further analysis of the mutant is <strong>in</strong> progress.<br />
References<br />
Clouse SD, Langford M, McMorris TC. 1996. A brass<strong>in</strong>osteroid<strong>in</strong>sensitive<br />
mutant <strong>in</strong> Arabidopsis thaliana exhibits multiple<br />
defects <strong>in</strong> growth and development. Plant Physiol. 111:671-<br />
678.<br />
Kieber JJ, Rothenberg M, Roman G, Feldmann KA, Ecker JR. 1993.<br />
CTR1, a negative regulator of the ethylene response pathway<br />
<strong>in</strong> Arabidopsis, encodes a member of the Raf family of prote<strong>in</strong><br />
k<strong>in</strong>ases. Cell 72:427-441.<br />
Yamamuro C, Ihara Y, Wu X, Noguchi T, Fujioka S, Takatsuto S,<br />
Ashikari M, Kitano H, Matsuoka M. 2000. Loss of function<br />
of a rice brass<strong>in</strong>osteroid <strong>in</strong>sensitive 1 homolog prevents <strong>in</strong>ternode<br />
elongation and bend<strong>in</strong>g of the lam<strong>in</strong>a jo<strong>in</strong>t. Plant Cell<br />
12:1-16.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ address: Graduate School of Bioagricultural Sciences,<br />
Nagoya University, Japan. E-mail: i002014m@<br />
mbox.media.nagoya-u.ac.jp.<br />
86 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
Genetic diversity, evolution,<br />
and alien <strong>in</strong>trogression
88 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
RAPD variation <strong>in</strong> carbonized rice aged 13,010<br />
and 17,310 years<br />
H.S. Suh, J.H. Cho, Y.J. Lee, and M.H. Heu<br />
A few pieces of carbonized rice hull were excavated from two peat-soil layers <strong>in</strong> Sorori Village located <strong>in</strong> the middle part of<br />
South Korea. The upper peat-soil layer, where the carbonized rice hull was excavated, was evaluated to be about 13,010 ±<br />
190 years old by carbon isotope dat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Geochron Laboratories, Massachusetts, USA. The lower layer, where the carbonized<br />
quasi-rice was excavated, was estimated to be 17,310 ± 310 years old. Variation <strong>in</strong> randomly amplified polymorphic DNA<br />
(RAPD) of four samples of carbonized rice and two samples of carbonized quasi-rice was studied us<strong>in</strong>g four DNA primers (A32,<br />
OPK-14, OPO-15, and OPN-16). Among the carbonized rice aged 13,010 years, 34.1% of the RAPD bands were the same as<br />
those of current rice and 65.9% were specific to carbonized rice. Among the carbonized quasi-rice aged 17,310 years, 38.7%<br />
of the RAPD bands were the same as those of current rice, 48.4% were the same as those of carbonized rice, and 12.9% were<br />
specific to carbonized quasi-rice. The carbonized rice and quasi-rice showed at least more than one RAPD band common to the<br />
current, <strong>in</strong>dica, japonica, weedy, and wild rice. By cluster analysis based on RAPD variation, the carbonized rice and quasi-rice<br />
were classified <strong>in</strong>to the same group and the current rice was categorized <strong>in</strong>to another group. Genetic similarity between the<br />
ancient carbonized rice and the current rice group was around 57%.<br />
Only a few reports are available on the evolutionary pattern of<br />
rice. In these reports, genetic diversity is based on morphological<br />
traits and isozyme and molecular divergence <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g<br />
nuclear, chloroplast, and mitochondrial genes. In this paper,<br />
variation was detected us<strong>in</strong>g random amplified polymorphic<br />
DNA (RAPD) markers.<br />
Materials and methods<br />
DNA was extracted from four pieces of carbonized rice hull<br />
excavated from a peat-soil layer aged 13,010 ± 190 years and<br />
from two pieces of carbonized quasi-rice hull excavated from<br />
the layer aged 17,310 ± 310 years.<br />
A total volume of 25 mL reaction mix was completed<br />
with 2.5 mL of 10X polymerase cha<strong>in</strong> reaction (PCR) buffer,<br />
0.2 mol primer, 0.2 mmol dNTPs, 1 unit of Taq DNA polymerase<br />
(Promega), and 2 mL of ancient DNA from the carbonized<br />
rice and/or carbonized quasi-rice hull. Four primers—<br />
A32 (5-CTTGTCATGTGT-3), OPK-14 (5-CCCGCTACAC-<br />
3), OPO-15 (5-TGGCGTCCTT-3), and OPN-16 (5-<br />
AAGCGACCTG-3)—were used for DNA amplification. The<br />
reaction mix was subjected to the Perk<strong>in</strong> Elmer 2400 thermal<br />
cycler for 45 cycles consist<strong>in</strong>g of 1 m<strong>in</strong> at 94 °C, 1 m<strong>in</strong> at 37<br />
°C, and 2 m<strong>in</strong> at 72 °C, followed by an extension of 5 m<strong>in</strong> at<br />
72 °C. Five mL of the first PCR product underwent a second<br />
PCR with the same process. Amplified DNA fragments were<br />
analyzed by 1.4% agarose gel electrophoresis, followed by<br />
ethidium bromide sta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g.<br />
Four k<strong>in</strong>ds of carbonized rice samples (carbonized rice<br />
1, 2, 3, and 4) excavated from the peat-soil layer aged 13,010<br />
years, two k<strong>in</strong>ds of carbonized quasi-rice samples (quasi-rice<br />
1 and quasi-rice 2) excavated from the layer aged 17,310 years,<br />
and five genotypes of rice— IR36 (<strong>in</strong>dica), T65 (japonica),<br />
Hapcheon 3 (short-gra<strong>in</strong> weedy rice), Kyongsan 2 (long-gra<strong>in</strong><br />
weedy rice), and W1944 (japonica <strong>in</strong>cl<strong>in</strong>ed wild rice)—were<br />
compared us<strong>in</strong>g four primers. Genetic similarity was analyzed<br />
us<strong>in</strong>g Nei’s formula (1987).<br />
Results and discussion<br />
Comparison of RAPD between carbonized<br />
and current rice<br />
DNA from the ancient carbonized rice samples (Fig. 1) could<br />
be amplified twice by PCR and clear RAPD bands could be<br />
detected from the ancient carbonized rice hulls excavated from<br />
the peat-soil layers aged 13,010 and 17,310 years (Fig. 2).<br />
The m<strong>in</strong>imum number of bands detected with the four<br />
primers was 1 <strong>in</strong> the carbonized quasi-rice and 2 with primer<br />
A32. The maximum number was 10 <strong>in</strong> carbonized rice 1 with<br />
primer OPN-16. The total number of bands detected from the<br />
four carbonized rice samples was 85 and that from the two<br />
carbonized quasi-rice was 31 (Table 1). Twenty-n<strong>in</strong>e RAPD<br />
bands among 85 detected <strong>in</strong> the four carbonized rice samples<br />
were the same as those <strong>in</strong> the current rice. Fifty-six bands were<br />
different from those of the current rice. This result showed<br />
that 34.1% of the bands <strong>in</strong> the four carbonized rice samples<br />
were the same as those <strong>in</strong> the current rice (Table 2). In contrast,<br />
<strong>in</strong> the two carbonized quasi-rice, 12 of 31 bands were<br />
the same as those <strong>in</strong> the current rice, 15 bands were the same<br />
as those <strong>in</strong> the carbonized rice, and 4 bands were specific to<br />
the carbonized quasi-rice. The results showed that 38.7% of<br />
the bands tested <strong>in</strong> the two quasi-rice samples were the same<br />
as those <strong>in</strong> the current rice, 48.4% were the same as those <strong>in</strong><br />
the carbonized rice, and 12.9% were specific to the carbonized<br />
quasi-rice (Table 2).<br />
All the ancient carbonized rice samples showed one to<br />
three bands common to the current, <strong>in</strong>dica, japonica, weedy,<br />
and wild rice. Carbonized rice 1 had three bands common to<br />
the current, <strong>in</strong>dica, japonica, weedy, and wild rice. However,<br />
carbonized rice 2 showed a weedy rice-specific band; carbon-<br />
Genetic diversity, evolution, and alien <strong>in</strong>trogression 89
M 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 M<br />
A<br />
B<br />
C<br />
Fig. 1. Hull shape of carbonized<br />
rice from soil layer aged<br />
13,010 years (A), carbonized<br />
quasi-rice from soil aged<br />
17,310 years (B), and current<br />
japonica rice (C).<br />
Fig. 2. RAPD bands of ancient carbonized rice samples and current<br />
rice tested with primer OPO-15. Lane 1: T65 (japonica), lane<br />
2: IR36 (<strong>in</strong>dica), lane 3: carbonized rice 1, lane 4: carbonized rice<br />
2, lane 5: carbonized rice 3, lane 6: carbonized rice 4, lane 7:<br />
carbonized quasi-rice 1, lane 8: carbonized quasi-rice 2, lane 9:<br />
Hapcheon 3 (weedy rice), lane 10: Kyongsan 2 (long-gra<strong>in</strong> weedy<br />
rice), lane 11: W1944 (wild rice), lane 12: control, M: marker DNA/<br />
EcoT141.<br />
Table 1. Number of RAPD bands amplified <strong>in</strong> the<br />
four carbonized rice samples with primers A32,<br />
OPK-14, OPO-15, and OPN-16.<br />
Table 2. Number of RAPD bands amplified <strong>in</strong> the two carbonized<br />
quasi-rice samples with primers A32, OPK-14, OPO-15,<br />
and OPN-16.<br />
Primer<br />
Number of bands<br />
Primer<br />
Number of bands<br />
Specific to Specific to Total<br />
current rice carbonized rice<br />
Specific to Specific to Specific to Total<br />
current rice carbonized rice quasi-rice<br />
A32 11 6 17<br />
OPK-14 3 8 11<br />
OPO-15 7 16 23<br />
OPN-16 8 26 34<br />
Total 29 56 85<br />
(34.1%) (65.9%) (100%)<br />
A32 1 1 1 3<br />
OPK-14 3 2 1 6<br />
OPO-15 4 5 1 10<br />
OPN-16 4 7 1 12<br />
Total 12 15 4 31<br />
(38.7%) (48.4%) (12.9%) (100%)<br />
Table 3. Number of RAPD bands specific to the current and carbonized rice amplified from four carbonized<br />
rice and two carbonized quasi-rice samples with primers A32, OPK-14, OPO-15, and OPN-16.<br />
Material<br />
tested<br />
Number of bands<br />
Common Specific to Specific Specific Specific Specific<br />
to current rice <strong>in</strong>dica to japonica to weedy to wild to ancient<br />
(IR36) (T65) rice rice rice<br />
Carbonized rice 1 3 0 0 0 0 18<br />
Carbonized rice 2 3 0 0 1 0 9<br />
Carbonized rice 3 2 1 1 2 0 15<br />
Carbonized rice 4 3 1 2 2 1 14<br />
Carbonized quasi-rice 1 2 1 2 2 0 12<br />
Carbonized quasi-rice 2 1 1 0 1 0 7<br />
Total 14 4 5 8 1 75<br />
ized rice 3 had <strong>in</strong>dica-, japonica-, and weedy rice-specific<br />
bands; and carbonized rice 4 had <strong>in</strong>dica-, japonica-, weedy-,<br />
and wild rice-specific bands <strong>in</strong> addition to the common bands<br />
(Table 3). Carbonized quasi-rice 1 showed <strong>in</strong>dica-, japonica-,<br />
and weedy rice-specific bands and carbonized quasi-rice 2 had<br />
<strong>in</strong>dica- and weedy rice-specific bands <strong>in</strong> addition to the common<br />
bands (Table 3).<br />
Even though the shape of the ancient carbonized rice<br />
was similar to that of the current japonica rice, the genetic<br />
basis of these materials was different. Therefore, we could not<br />
conclude whether the ancient carbonized rice belonged to the<br />
<strong>in</strong>dica, japonica, weedy, or wild form. The ancient carbonized<br />
rice might be a primitive form of rice.<br />
90 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
Genetic similarity<br />
0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0<br />
Quasi-rice 2<br />
Carbonized rice 3<br />
Carbonized rice 2<br />
Carbonized rice 1<br />
Quasi-rice 1<br />
Carbonized rice 4<br />
W1944 (wild rice)<br />
Hapcheon 3 (weedy)<br />
T65 (japonica)<br />
Kyongsan 2 (weedy)<br />
IR36 (<strong>in</strong>dica)<br />
Fig. 3. A dendrogram show<strong>in</strong>g genetic relationships among ancient<br />
carbonized and current rice based on RAPD variation.<br />
The hull shape of the carbonized rice was almost identical<br />
to that of the current rice. The hull of the carbonized quasirice<br />
was slightly different from that of carbonized rice and/or<br />
the current rice, but the two ancient rice samples showed relatively<br />
high genetic similarity. Further studies on the ancient<br />
carbonized rice excavated from the peat-soil layers aged 13,010<br />
and 17,310 years would provide useful <strong>in</strong>formation on the evolution<br />
of rice species.<br />
References<br />
Nei M. 1987. Molecular evolutionary genetics. New York (USA):<br />
Columbia University Press. 512 p.<br />
Classification of carbonized rice<br />
When genetic similarity was analyzed by Nei’s method based<br />
on RAPD variation, the carbonized rice and the carbonized<br />
quasi-rice were classified <strong>in</strong>to one group and the current, <strong>in</strong>dica,<br />
japonica, weedy, and wild rice <strong>in</strong>to another group (Fig.<br />
2). Genetic similarity between the two groups was around 57%<br />
(Fig. 3).<br />
Notes<br />
Diphyletic orig<strong>in</strong> of cultivated rice based<br />
on genetic analysis and archaeology<br />
Y.I. Sato, S. Yamanaka, and Y. Fukuta<br />
Authors’ addresses: H.S. Suh and J.H. Cho, College of Natural Resources,<br />
Yeungnam University, Kyongsan, Korea; Y.J. Lee,<br />
Chungbuk National University, Cheongju, Korea; M.H. Heu,<br />
Seoul National University, Suwon, Korea.<br />
We formulated a hypothesis on the orig<strong>in</strong> of cultivated rice based on the results of DNA analysis of excavated rice gra<strong>in</strong>s and<br />
recent available archaeological and biological data. We concluded that a major varietal group—japonica—had differentiated<br />
from its ancestral species of wild rice <strong>in</strong> the middle and lower bas<strong>in</strong>s of the Yangtze River about 11,000 to 14,000 years ago.<br />
Some japonica stra<strong>in</strong>s were brought <strong>in</strong>to the southwestern prov<strong>in</strong>ces of Ch<strong>in</strong>a several thousand years ago and then transmitted<br />
to the tropics. Another varietal group—<strong>in</strong>dica—could have orig<strong>in</strong>ated <strong>in</strong> the flooded pla<strong>in</strong>s of the tropics by <strong>in</strong>cidental natural<br />
hybridization(s) between <strong>in</strong>digenous wild relatives and japonica cultivars.<br />
The orig<strong>in</strong> of Asian cultivated rice (Oryza sativa L.) has been<br />
controversial regard<strong>in</strong>g its ancestors and phylogenetic relationship<br />
among varietal groups as well as its geographic orig<strong>in</strong>.<br />
Molecular genetic analysis suggests multiple parentage of the<br />
two major varietal groups of cultivars, <strong>in</strong>dica and japonica. A<br />
recent archaeological study <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a suggested <strong>in</strong>cipient<br />
japonica cultivation <strong>in</strong> the middle and lower bas<strong>in</strong>s of the<br />
Yangtze River. Here, a new hypothesis on the geographic orig<strong>in</strong><br />
and phylogeny of cultivated rice is described.<br />
Phylogenetic relationship of wild cultivated rice<br />
Varietal differentiation of <strong>in</strong>dica and japonica<br />
The two major varietal groups, <strong>in</strong>dica and japonica, are reported<br />
to be shaped by a nonrandom association of alleles at<br />
many <strong>in</strong>dependent loci for various traits (Oka 1958, Sato et al<br />
1990). The nonrandom association was observed <strong>in</strong> isozyme<br />
loci, restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP), rDNA,<br />
and so on. Polymorphism <strong>in</strong> cpDNA (Chen et al 1993) and<br />
differential sequence <strong>in</strong> the plastid subtype ID region (PS-ID)<br />
have been observed <strong>in</strong> both <strong>in</strong>dica and japonica (Fig. 1). Such<br />
a state of disequilibrium between nuclear and cytoplasmic DNA<br />
types suggests a diphyletic orig<strong>in</strong> of <strong>in</strong>dica and japonica rice.<br />
Evidence for <strong>in</strong>dica-japonica differentiation<br />
<strong>in</strong> wild rice<br />
The deletion <strong>in</strong> cpDNA was seen not only <strong>in</strong> cultivars but also<br />
<strong>in</strong> wild rice stra<strong>in</strong>s. This deletion was frequently found <strong>in</strong> annual<br />
stra<strong>in</strong>s of O. rufipogon (or O. nivara), but seldom <strong>in</strong> other<br />
species. The deletion orig<strong>in</strong>ated <strong>in</strong> the O. rufipogon complex<br />
(Chen et al 1993) and was transferred to <strong>in</strong>dica cultivars. RFLPs<br />
<strong>in</strong> genomic DNA of wild rice suggest that the <strong>in</strong>dica-japonica<br />
differentiation occurred before domestication had begun. The<br />
p-SINE-r2 polymorphism found at the Waxy locus <strong>in</strong> wild relatives<br />
dist<strong>in</strong>guishes <strong>in</strong>dica-type (annual) stra<strong>in</strong>s from japonicatype<br />
(perennial) stra<strong>in</strong>s.<br />
Genetic diversity, evolution, and alien <strong>in</strong>trogression 91
Time and<br />
climate<br />
Tropical<br />
zone<br />
Temperate<br />
zone<br />
Adapt to<br />
upland or<br />
extensive<br />
conditions<br />
Adapt to<br />
paddy or<br />
<strong>in</strong>tensive<br />
conditions<br />
Indica<br />
Tropical<br />
japonica<br />
Temperate<br />
japonica<br />
8C8A-D<br />
6C9A-D<br />
7C7A-D<br />
6C8A-D<br />
7C6A-ND<br />
6C7A-ND<br />
6C7A-ND<br />
Appearance of<br />
ancient<br />
civilization<br />
Natural hybridization<br />
Incipient<br />
japonica<br />
Beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g of rice<br />
cultivation<br />
Cenozoic<br />
appearance of<br />
disturbed habitat<br />
8C8A-D<br />
6C9A-D<br />
7C7A-D<br />
6C8A-D<br />
O. nivara<br />
Annual,<br />
seed<br />
propagation<br />
<br />
O. rufipogon<br />
Perennial,<br />
vegetative<br />
propagation<br />
Acquisition of<br />
high seed<br />
productivity<br />
Fig. 1. A diagram show<strong>in</strong>g the phylogeny of rice.<br />
Description <strong>in</strong> circles <strong>in</strong>dicates cpDNA types def<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
by PS-ID sequence (Nakamura et al 1997)<br />
and the presence or absence of 69 base-pair deletions<br />
<strong>in</strong> the ORF100 region (Chen et al 1993). In<br />
the PS-ID region, the first 13 to 16 base sequences<br />
consist of 6 to 8 C-molecules followed<br />
by 6 to 9 A-molecules. For <strong>in</strong>stance, 6C7A means<br />
that the first 13-base sequence is<br />
CCCCCCAAAAAAA. A 69 base-pair deletion exists<br />
at the ORF100 region of cpDNA <strong>in</strong> certa<strong>in</strong> stra<strong>in</strong>s<br />
of rice (N = with deletion, ND = without deletion).<br />
The first domestication occurred <strong>in</strong> O. rufipogon,<br />
which acquired high productivity of seed, from<br />
which japonica cultivars arose. After the diversification<br />
of japonica <strong>in</strong> the tropics, natural hybridization<br />
occurred with O. nivara, from which <strong>in</strong>dica<br />
cultivars arose.<br />
Genetic diversity <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>dica cultivars<br />
Domestication usually reduces genetic diversity with<strong>in</strong> a population.<br />
However, <strong>in</strong>dica cultivars are more diverse than japonica<br />
cultivars <strong>in</strong> molecular markers (Zhang et al 1992). Such genetic<br />
diversification <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>dica cultivars may suggest their defuse<br />
orig<strong>in</strong>s. The fact that almost all <strong>in</strong>dica cultivars have the<br />
deleted cpDNA regardless of nuclear genomes suggests their<br />
limited derivation; they could have been derived from natural<br />
hybridization.<br />
Geographic orig<strong>in</strong> and distribution of wild and cultivated rice<br />
Chang-Watabe hypothesis<br />
It has been commonly accepted that the Asian cultivated rice<br />
(Oryza sativa L.) was born <strong>in</strong> the Himalayan foothills. Based<br />
on the shape of spikelets found <strong>in</strong> old bricks <strong>in</strong> South and Southeast<br />
Asia, it was concluded that the cultivated rice domesticated<br />
<strong>in</strong> the “Assam-Yunnan area” largely overlapped with the<br />
region mentioned above. A similar hypothesis was proposed<br />
by Chang (1976). Aga<strong>in</strong>st the Chang-Watabe hypothesis, assumptions<br />
of defuse orig<strong>in</strong> (Harlan 1975) were also proposed.<br />
In many reports, Ch<strong>in</strong>a and India were regarded as the centers<br />
of orig<strong>in</strong>. However, these works were formulated on the basis<br />
of limited evidence only.<br />
Ancient rice rema<strong>in</strong>s<br />
Recent archaeological records strongly suggest that rice cultivation<br />
began <strong>in</strong> the middle and lower bas<strong>in</strong>s of the Yangtze<br />
River. In Hunan and Ja<strong>in</strong>xi prov<strong>in</strong>ces, old relics (11,000 to<br />
16,000 years BP, see Fig. 2) were found <strong>in</strong> caves from which<br />
phytolith of rice spikelets was detected. However, the age may<br />
be slightly overestimated. Five spikelets of wild rice were ob-<br />
92 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
Yellow River<br />
Yangtze River<br />
1<br />
3<br />
North limit<br />
of wild rice<br />
distribution<br />
2<br />
Archaeological sites of rice cultivation<br />
(older than 6,000 years BP)<br />
Fig. 2. A map show<strong>in</strong>g the proposed homeland of cultivated rice. Areas 1, 2, and 3 are proposed by this paper, Chang (1976), and Watabe<br />
et al (1977), respectively. Note that archaeological sites of rice cultivation that are older than 6,000 years are distributed <strong>in</strong> area 1, but<br />
not <strong>in</strong> areas 2 and 3.<br />
served among 81 excavated samples among the Homedu relics<br />
(7,000 years BP, Zhejiang Prov<strong>in</strong>ce). Some spikelets had<br />
<strong>in</strong>termediate features between wild and cultivated species.<br />
These facts may <strong>in</strong>dicate the existence of primitive cultivars<br />
dur<strong>in</strong>g the Homedu period. Such old rice rema<strong>in</strong>s are not recorded<br />
<strong>in</strong> the southwestern prov<strong>in</strong>ces of Ch<strong>in</strong>a. These archaeological<br />
data def<strong>in</strong>itely disagree with the Chang-Watabe hypothesis.<br />
In India, many relics have been excavated all over the<br />
country, particularly <strong>in</strong> the Ganga bas<strong>in</strong>, but these are not older<br />
than 2200 BC. In Thailand and Vietnam, some relics have been<br />
found that were not older than 3000 BC. <strong>Rice</strong> cultivation began<br />
not earlier than 3000 BC <strong>in</strong> the pla<strong>in</strong>s area of the tropics,<br />
as far as current excavations po<strong>in</strong>t out.<br />
DNA analysis for ancient rice gra<strong>in</strong>s<br />
Many rice gra<strong>in</strong>s have been excavated from archaeological<br />
sites. Some of them dried out, but others rema<strong>in</strong> fresh. Yu<br />
(1979) postulated that a rice variety <strong>in</strong> ancient Ch<strong>in</strong>a (Homedu<br />
period, approximately 7,000 years BP) was a mixture of <strong>in</strong>dica<br />
and japonica, judg<strong>in</strong>g from the shape of excavated gra<strong>in</strong>s.<br />
Gra<strong>in</strong> shape, however, is not a good <strong>in</strong>dicator for classify<strong>in</strong>g a<br />
rice variety (Sato 1991).<br />
We attempted to extract DNA from “fresh” and unfired<br />
excavated rice gra<strong>in</strong>s. Up to this date, 28 gra<strong>in</strong>s excavated <strong>in</strong><br />
Ch<strong>in</strong>a, Korea, Japan, and Thailand have been assigned their<br />
PS-ID type. Of the 28 gra<strong>in</strong>s exam<strong>in</strong>ed, 27 from Ch<strong>in</strong>a, Korea,<br />
and Japan (1,900 to 6,000 years BP) were either 6C7A or<br />
7C6A types, which are both japonica-specific sequences. Only<br />
one from Thailand (Lopburi prefecture, approximately 2,500<br />
years BP) was identified as be<strong>in</strong>g a 7C7A type, a type of <strong>in</strong>dica.<br />
The data strongly suggested that <strong>in</strong>cipient cultivars <strong>in</strong><br />
eastern Asia were predom<strong>in</strong>antly japonica.<br />
Conclusions<br />
Asian cultivated rice is concluded to have a defuse orig<strong>in</strong>, based<br />
on new data <strong>in</strong>troduced. Japonica probably orig<strong>in</strong>ated <strong>in</strong> the<br />
middle and lower bas<strong>in</strong>s of the Yangtze River 11,000 to 14,000<br />
Genetic diversity, evolution, and alien <strong>in</strong>trogression 93
years ago, a type of O. rufipogon with nondeleted cpDNA.<br />
Perhaps domestication began when stra<strong>in</strong>s of O. rufipogon with<br />
a relatively high seed productivity because of stress conditions<br />
appeared because of the cooler and drier conditions <strong>in</strong><br />
that period. Japonica cultivars were diversify<strong>in</strong>g all over Ch<strong>in</strong>a<br />
about 3,000 years ago. Some stra<strong>in</strong>s reached the tropics across<br />
the Yunnan mounta<strong>in</strong>s. Perhaps those japonica stra<strong>in</strong>s were<br />
hybridized by <strong>in</strong>digenous annual types of wild rice to produce<br />
<strong>in</strong>dica cultivars.<br />
High genetic diversity <strong>in</strong> the Oriental Fertile Crescent is<br />
expla<strong>in</strong>ed by the <strong>in</strong>troduction of <strong>in</strong>dica and japonica cultivars<br />
from the tropics and eastern Ch<strong>in</strong>a, respectively, and by the<br />
consequent natural hybridization between them (Second 1981).<br />
The genetic variation created has been preserved there without<br />
erosion because of the complex conditions of climate, geography,<br />
and human races. A susta<strong>in</strong>able way of agriculture<br />
may have played an important role <strong>in</strong> this preservation. The<br />
Oriental Fertile Crescent area would be a case of a secondary<br />
center of genetic diversity (Vavilov 1926).<br />
For future work, biological analysis of plant and animal<br />
rema<strong>in</strong>s (bioarchaeology) would play an important role.<br />
Harlan JR. 1975. Crops and man. Madison, Wis. (USA): American<br />
Society of Agronomy/Crop Science Society of America.<br />
Oka HI. 1958. Interval variation and classification of cultivated rice.<br />
Indian J. Genet. Plant Breed. 18:79-89.<br />
Sato YI. 1991. Variation <strong>in</strong> spikelet of the <strong>in</strong>dica and japonica rice<br />
cultivars of Asian orig<strong>in</strong>. Jpn. J. Breed. 41:121-134. (In Japanese<br />
with English summary.)<br />
Sato YI, Ishikawa R, Morishima H. 1990. Nonrandom association<br />
of genes and characters <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>dica and japonica rice. Heredity<br />
65:75-79.<br />
Second G. 1981. Orig<strong>in</strong> of the genetic diversity of cultivated rice<br />
(Oryza spp.): study of the polymorphism scored at 40 isozyme<br />
loci. Jpn. J. Genet. 57:25-57.<br />
Vavilov NI. 1926. Studies on the orig<strong>in</strong> of cultivated plants. Bull.<br />
Appl. Bot. 16:139-248.<br />
Watabe T et al. 1977. <strong>Rice</strong> road. Tokyo (Japan): Nippon Housou<br />
Kyoukai. (In Japanese.)<br />
Yu XL. 1979. Orig<strong>in</strong>, differentiation and dissem<strong>in</strong>ation of cultivated<br />
rice <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a, as suggested by rice gra<strong>in</strong>s excavated at Homedu.<br />
Acta Agron. S<strong>in</strong>. 5(3):1-12. (In Ch<strong>in</strong>ese.)<br />
Zhang Q, Maroof MAS, Lu TY, Shen BZ. 1992. Genetic diversity<br />
and differentiation of <strong>in</strong>dica and japonica rice detected by<br />
RFLP analysis. Theor. Appl. Genet. 83:495-499.<br />
References<br />
Chang TT. 1976. The orig<strong>in</strong>, evolution, cultivation, dissem<strong>in</strong>ation,<br />
and diversification of Asian and African rices. Euphytica<br />
25:431-441.<br />
Chen WB, Nakamura I, Sato YI, Nakai H. 1993. Distribution of<br />
deletion type <strong>in</strong> cpDNA of cultivated and wild rice. Jpn. J.<br />
Genet. 68:597-603.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ addresses: Y.I. Sato and S. Yamanaka, Faculty of Agriculture,<br />
Shizuoka University, Shizuoka City 422-8529, Japan;<br />
Y. Fukuta, <strong>IRRI</strong>, DAPO Box 7777, Metro Manila, Philipp<strong>in</strong>es.<br />
Evolutionary and molecular genetic studies<br />
at the waxy locus <strong>in</strong> cultivated rice and wild relatives<br />
S. Yamanaka, I. Nakamura, H. Nakai, and Y.I. Sato<br />
We <strong>in</strong>vestigated polymorphism <strong>in</strong> the waxy Wx locus among wild and cultivated rice. p-SINE1-r2, a retrotransposon <strong>in</strong>serted at<br />
the Wx locus <strong>in</strong> Oryza sativa, showed polymorphism between wild rice O. nivara and O. rufipogon. This p-SINE1 polymorphism<br />
could expla<strong>in</strong> 70% of the annual-perennial differentiation, and it also corresponds to <strong>in</strong>dica-japonica differentiation <strong>in</strong> wild<br />
relatives. We also analyzed the first <strong>in</strong>tron-exon splice site (AG/GT or AG/TT; G-T polymorphism). It was suggested that G-T<br />
polymorphism corresponds to Wx a -Wx b and <strong>in</strong>dica-japonica, respectively. Wild relatives possessed an AG/GT type without exception.<br />
In 300 waxy stra<strong>in</strong>s, they have a mostly AG/TT (japonica-type) sequence, except for 10 stra<strong>in</strong>s, <strong>in</strong>dependently of<br />
<strong>in</strong>dica-japonica differentiation. It was concluded that waxy mutation and waxy rice cultivation had orig<strong>in</strong>ated from japonica.<br />
The waxy locus, which is responsible for amylose synthesis <strong>in</strong><br />
the endosperm, has been well studied <strong>in</strong> many cereals. The<br />
wild relatives of Oryza sativa seem to be differentiated <strong>in</strong>to<br />
two groups at the Wx locus, and these results supported our<br />
“diphyletic hypothesis.”<br />
Materials<br />
A total of 300 waxy stra<strong>in</strong>s of O. sativa collected from various<br />
Asian countries and 23 stra<strong>in</strong>s each of two wild relatives, O.<br />
rufipogon and O. nivara, were used for DNA analysis. Oryza<br />
rufipogon and O. nivara were classified as perennial and annual<br />
types, respectively, based on propagation systems observed<br />
<strong>in</strong> their natural habitats (Sato 1994).<br />
Analyses for p-SINE1-r2 polymorphism and <strong>in</strong>dica-japonica<br />
differentiation <strong>in</strong> wild relatives<br />
We analyzed the size of the polymerase cha<strong>in</strong> reaction (PCR)<br />
fragment of the waxy structural gene. In O. sativa, there was<br />
94 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
Table 1. Species characteristics <strong>in</strong> terms of annual-perennial habit, presence or absence of p-SINE1-r2 at Wx locus, and <strong>in</strong>dica-japonica<br />
differentiation <strong>in</strong> two wild relatives of rice.<br />
Species Stra<strong>in</strong> A-P a p-SINE1-r2 b ORF 100 c CMN-A32 d Species Stra<strong>in</strong> A-P a p-SINE1-r2 b ORF 100 c CMN-A32 d<br />
O. nivara HT12c A – + D I<br />
O. rufipogon HT3 P – ND J<br />
HT6 P – D J<br />
HT12a P – ND I<br />
CT1 P – ND J<br />
CT6 P – ND I<br />
CT7 P – ND J<br />
CT10 P – ND J<br />
CT11 P – + ND J<br />
CT13 P – ND J<br />
CT14 P – ND J<br />
CT15a P – ND J<br />
CB2a P – + ND J<br />
CB2b P – ND J<br />
CP5a P + D I<br />
CP45b P – D J<br />
CP46a P – ND J<br />
NN61 P – ND J<br />
NE103 P + D J<br />
NE114 P – + ND J<br />
NE115A P – ND J<br />
LV10A-1 P – ND I<br />
LV27 P – D I<br />
W1944 P – ND J<br />
CB7c A – + D I<br />
CB8 A + ND I<br />
CP4a A + D I<br />
CP38 A – + D J<br />
CP43a A – D J<br />
NN59a A – D J<br />
NE41 A + D I<br />
NE53 A – D I<br />
NE55 A + D I<br />
NE58 A + D I<br />
NE59 A + D I<br />
NE60 A – D I<br />
NE62 A – + D I<br />
NE84 A + D J<br />
NE101 A + D I<br />
NE102 A + D I<br />
NE104 A + D I<br />
NE105 A + D I<br />
NE106 A + D I<br />
NE108 A + ND I<br />
LV9 A – + D I<br />
LV36B A + D I<br />
a P = present, A = absent. b + = present, – = absent. c D = chloroplast DNA detected, ND = chloroplast DNA not detected. d J = japonica, I = <strong>in</strong>dica.<br />
no polymorphism. However, p-SINE1-r2, a retrotransposon<br />
that was <strong>in</strong>serted <strong>in</strong> the 10th <strong>in</strong>tron of the Wx gene of O. sativa<br />
(Umeda et al 1991), showed polymorphism between O. nivara<br />
and O. rufipogon. Most of O. nivara (annual), as well as O.<br />
sativa, possessed this element but most of the O. rufipogon<br />
(perennial) lacked it. To evaluate <strong>in</strong>dica-japonica differentiation<br />
<strong>in</strong> these wild relatives, both nuclear (CMN-A32) and chloroplast<br />
(ORF100) DNA were analyzed by PCR. The results<br />
<strong>in</strong>dicated that 74% of O. nivara had <strong>in</strong>dica features, whereas<br />
65% of O. rufipogon showed japonica traits (Table 1). From<br />
test results us<strong>in</strong>g the 46 stra<strong>in</strong>s, the annual-perennial habit (A,<br />
P), p-SINE1-r2 polymorphism (+, –), chloroplast DNA (D,<br />
ND), and nuclear DNA (I, J) were nonrandomly associated<br />
with each other, <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g that a typical O. nivara (A, +, D, I)<br />
and a typical O. rufipogon (P, –, ND, J) are dom<strong>in</strong>ant <strong>in</strong> natural<br />
populations. This suggests that the wild relatives of O. sativa<br />
had clearly differentiated <strong>in</strong>to annual and perennial groups<br />
at the Wx locus, and these two groups correspond to an <strong>in</strong>dica<br />
type of O. nivara and a japonica type of O. rufipogon. This is<br />
strong evidence that O. nivara and O. rufipogon are wild ancestors<br />
of <strong>in</strong>dica and japonica, respectively, and that the orig<strong>in</strong><br />
of O. sativa seems to be diphyletic.<br />
G-T polymorphism <strong>in</strong> waxy stra<strong>in</strong>s<br />
It was suggested that the first <strong>in</strong>tron-exon splice site shows<br />
nucleotide polymorphism (AG/GT or AG/TT; G-T polymorphism),<br />
and that this G-T polymorphism corresponds to different<br />
alleles, Wx a and Wx b , or <strong>in</strong>dica-japonica, respectively<br />
(Hirano et al 1998, Issiki et al 1998). We made cleaved amplified<br />
polymorphic sequences (CAPS) markers to detect one base<br />
substitution without sequenc<strong>in</strong>g analyses. This G-T mutation<br />
site is not a restriction site, so we applied the derived CAPS<br />
(dCAPS) method (Michaels and Amas<strong>in</strong>o 1998, Neff et al<br />
1998). This dCAPS marker correctly detected G-T polymorphism<br />
(Fig. 1). The results of study<strong>in</strong>g the 46 stra<strong>in</strong>s of wild<br />
relatives <strong>in</strong>dicated that they possess the AG/GT type without<br />
exception. In 300 waxy stra<strong>in</strong>s from various countries and areas,<br />
AG/TT (japonica type) was the major sequence observed<br />
and only 10 stra<strong>in</strong>s had the AG/GT sequence, <strong>in</strong>dependently<br />
of <strong>in</strong>dica-japonica differentiation. This result suggests the<br />
ma<strong>in</strong>ly japonica feature of waxy rice cultivar at this site. It<br />
was concluded that waxy mutation had differentiated among<br />
japonica types dur<strong>in</strong>g their domestication.<br />
References<br />
Hirano HY, Eiguchi M, Sano Y. 1998. A s<strong>in</strong>gle base change altered<br />
the regulation of Waxy gene at the post-transcriptional level<br />
dur<strong>in</strong>g the domestication of rice. Mol. Biol. Evol. 15:978-<br />
987.<br />
Isshiki M, Mor<strong>in</strong>o K, Nakajima M, Okagaki RJ, Wessler SR, Izawa<br />
T, Shimamoto K. 1998. A naturally occurr<strong>in</strong>g functional allele<br />
of the rice waxy locus has a GT to TT mutation at the 5′<br />
splice site of the first <strong>in</strong>tron. Plant J. 15:133-138.<br />
Michaels SD, Amas<strong>in</strong>o RM. 1998. A robust method for detect<strong>in</strong>g<br />
s<strong>in</strong>gle-nucleotide changes as polymorphic markers by PCR.<br />
Plant J. 14:381-385.<br />
Neff MM, Neff JD, Chory J, Pepper AE. 1998. dCAPS, a simple<br />
technique for the genetic analysis of s<strong>in</strong>gle nucleotide poly-<br />
Genetic diversity, evolution, and alien <strong>in</strong>trogression 95
M 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 M<br />
dCAPS<br />
Sequence<br />
T G G T G G/T G G G T G T<br />
T G G T G G G G G T G T<br />
Fig.1. Comparison between dCAPS and<br />
sequenc<strong>in</strong>g analyses for the detection<br />
of G-T polymorphism. M = 100-bp ladder,<br />
1 = T65, 2 = Acc. 130, 3 = Acc.<br />
419, 4 = T65wx, 5 = Acc. 221, 6 =<br />
Th8, 7 = LN27Ag, 8 = LH5-7, 9 = P76,<br />
10 = Ch7, 11 = Is107, 12 = J177.<br />
morphisms: experimental applications <strong>in</strong> Arabidopsis thaliana<br />
genetics. Plant J. 14:387-392.<br />
Sato YI, editor. 1994. Ecological-genetic studies on wild and cultivated<br />
rice <strong>in</strong> tropical Asia (4th survey). Tropics 3:189-246.<br />
Umeda M, Ohtsubo H, Ohtsubo E. 1991. Diversification of the rice<br />
Waxy gene by <strong>in</strong>sertion of mobile DNA elements <strong>in</strong>to <strong>in</strong>trons.<br />
Jpn. J. Genet. 66:569-586.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ addresses: S. Yamanaka, The United Graduate School of<br />
Agricultural Sciences, Gifu University, Gifu 1193; S.<br />
Yamanaka, H. Nakai, and Y.I. Sato, Faculty of Agriculture,<br />
Shizuoka University, Shizuoka 422-8529; I. Nakamura, Graduate<br />
School of Science and Technology, Chiba University,<br />
Matsudo 271-0092, Japan.<br />
PCR-RFLP analysis of cpDNA and mtDNA <strong>in</strong> Oryza<br />
L.J. Chen, D.S. Lee, and H.S. Suh<br />
The conservation of gene order and the characterization of uniparental <strong>in</strong>heritance <strong>in</strong> chloroplast and mitochondrial genomes<br />
have led to the design of chloroplast and mitochondrial primers, which facilitate phylogenetic or population genetic studies <strong>in</strong><br />
plants. The polymerase cha<strong>in</strong> reaction–restriction fragment length polymorphism approach was used to detect genetic variations<br />
<strong>in</strong> cpDNA and mtDNA <strong>in</strong> the genus Oryza and to clarify the phylogenetic relationships among 10 different species. Five<br />
regions of the chloroplast genome and four regions of the mitochondrial genome were amplified with the plant cpDNA and<br />
mtDNA universal primers and digested with several restriction enzymes. Genetic variation was evident <strong>in</strong> some regions of the<br />
chloroplast and mitochondrial genomes among most <strong>in</strong>vestigated species. Species-diagnostic markers of cpDNA and mtDNA<br />
were found, show<strong>in</strong>g that differentiation of cpDNA and mtDNA varied from species to species. Intraspecific variations <strong>in</strong> cpDNA<br />
and mtDNA were also detected <strong>in</strong> four species of the Oryza sativa complex, <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g that <strong>in</strong>dica-japonica subspecific differentiation<br />
of cpDNA and mtDNA followed the trend noted <strong>in</strong> the O. sativa complex.<br />
The genus Oryza consists of 2 cultivated and 22 wild species<br />
(Khush 1997). These species are adapted to a broad range of<br />
habitats worldwide, which represent an enormous gene pool<br />
for the genetic improvement of rice. Phylogenetic analysis of<br />
chloroplast and mitochondrial genomes offers an effective way<br />
to study the evolution of plant species. Restriction fragment<br />
length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis of plant chloroplast<br />
DNA (cpDNA) and mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) has proved<br />
to be a powerful tool for phylogenetic studies <strong>in</strong> many crops,<br />
as well as <strong>in</strong> rice (Ishii et al 1993, Dally and Second 1990,<br />
Chen et al 1993, Sun et al 1996, Ge et al 1999). However,<br />
most of these studies focused on only a s<strong>in</strong>gle region of cpDNA<br />
by the polymerase cha<strong>in</strong> reaction (PCR) method or on only a<br />
few regions of mtDNA us<strong>in</strong>g the Southern blot RFLP approach.<br />
The conservation of gene order of the chloroplast and<br />
mitochondrial genomes and the knowledge of a complete chloroplast<br />
and mitochondrial sequence have led to the design of<br />
numerous “consensus” or “universal” chloroplast and mitochondria<br />
primers, which facilitate phylogenetic or population<br />
genetic studies (Demesure et al 1995, Dumol<strong>in</strong>-Lapegue et al<br />
1997). Such PCR-based RFLP approaches seem extremely<br />
attractive by comparison with traditional RFLP methods. Recently,<br />
PCR-RFLP analysis of cpDNA was undertaken <strong>in</strong> the<br />
genus Abies (Parducci and Szmidt 1999) and <strong>in</strong> mangrove species<br />
(Parani et al 2000). Our study aimed to identify the utility<br />
of the PCR-RFLP method <strong>in</strong> detect<strong>in</strong>g genetic variation of<br />
cpDNA and mtDNA <strong>in</strong> Oryza and to determ<strong>in</strong>e the phylogenetic<br />
relationships of the chloroplast and mitochondrial genomes<br />
among Oryza species.<br />
96 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
Table 1. cpDNA genetic differentiation <strong>in</strong> the region of ORF100 with<strong>in</strong> the genus Oryza.<br />
No. of ORF100 cpDNA type Deletion<br />
Species Genome entries type (%)<br />
Deletion Nondeletion Others<br />
Oryza sativa complex AA 85 19 65 0 22.4<br />
O. sativa AA 61 10 51 0 16.4<br />
Modern cultivars 7 2 5 0 28.6<br />
Landraces 37 4 33 0 10.8<br />
Weedy rice 17 4 13 0 23.5<br />
O. rufipogon AA 20 8 12 0 40.0<br />
O. barthii AA 2 1 1 0 50.0<br />
O. meridionalis AA 2 0 2 0 0<br />
Rhizome rice AA 1 0 1 0 0<br />
Oryza offic<strong>in</strong>alis complex CC 8 0 8 0 0<br />
O. offic<strong>in</strong>alis CC 2 0 2 0 0<br />
O. punctata BB, BBCC 2 0 2 0 0<br />
O. m<strong>in</strong>uta BBCC 1 0 1 0 0<br />
O. latifolia CCDD 1 0 1 0 0<br />
O. grandiglumis CCDD 2 0 2 0 0<br />
Genera related to Oryza 2 0 0 2 0<br />
Zizania latifolia – 1 0 0 1 0<br />
Leersia hexandra – 1 0 0 1 0<br />
Table 2. DNA sequences of primer pairs used <strong>in</strong> the study.<br />
Primer pair Sequence Size (bp) Amplification<br />
cp-trnH-trnK F 5′-ACGGGAATTGAACCCGCGCA-3′ 1,831 Successful<br />
R 5′-CCGACTAGTTCCGGGTTCGA-3′<br />
cp-psbC-trnS F 5′-GGTGGTGACCAAGAAACCAC-3′ 1,611 Successful<br />
R 5′-GGTTCGAATCCCTCTCTCTC-3′<br />
cp-rbcL-rbcL F 5′-ATGTCACCACAAACAGAAACTAAAGCAAGT-3′ 1,381 Successful<br />
R 5′-CTTCACAAGCAGCAGCTAGTTCAGGACTCC-3′<br />
cp-rbcL-ORF106 F 5′-ACTACAGATCTCATACTACCCC-3′ 3,274 Successful<br />
R 5′-ATGTCACCACAAACAGAAACTAAAGCAAGT-3′<br />
cp-ORF100 F 5′-GGCCATTTTCTTTAG-3′ 1,100 Successful<br />
R 5′-AGTCCACTCAGCCATCTCTC-3′<br />
mt-nad1B-nad1C F 5′-GCATTACGATCTGCAGCTCA-3′ 1,184 Successful<br />
R 5′-GGAGCTCGATTAGTTTCTGC-3′<br />
mt-nad4(1)-nad4(2) F 5′-CAGTGGGTTGGTCTGGTATG-3′ 2,100 Successful<br />
R 5′-TCATATGGGCTACTGAGGAG-3′<br />
mt-nad4(2)-nad4(3) F 5′-TGTTTCCCGAAGCGACACTT-3′ 2,840 Successful<br />
R 5′-AACCAGTCCATGACTTAACA-3′<br />
mt-coxII-coxII F 5′-AATCCAATCCCGCAAAGGATT-3′ 1,531 Failed<br />
R 5′-AGAAGATGATCCAGAATTGGG-3′<br />
mt-18S rRNA-15S rRNA F 5′-GTGTTGCTGAGACATGCGCC-3′ 1,177 Successful<br />
R 5′-ATATGGCGCAAGACGATTCC-3′<br />
Materials and methods<br />
Primer selection and DNA digestion<br />
Table 1 lists the materials used. Total DNA was extracted from<br />
fresh leaves of young seedl<strong>in</strong>gs us<strong>in</strong>g the CTAB protocol (Sun<br />
et al 1996).<br />
Ten pairs of universal primers for amplification of plant<br />
cpDNA and mtDNA (Demesure et al 1995, Dumol<strong>in</strong>-Lapegue<br />
et al 1997) were employed to amplify the correspond<strong>in</strong>g region<br />
<strong>in</strong> the chloroplast and mitochondrial genomes of rice<br />
(Hiratsuka et al 1989). The sequences of the primer pairs used<br />
and their designations are given <strong>in</strong> Table 2.<br />
Amplified PCR products were digested with several restriction<br />
enzyme comb<strong>in</strong>ations among the follow<strong>in</strong>g: H<strong>in</strong>dIII,<br />
EcoRI, PstI, ScaI, XbaI, DraI, AluI, DdeI, HaeIII, Sau3AI,<br />
TaqI, CfoI, and MspI. The digested cpDNA or mtDNA fragments<br />
were then separated on 1.8–4.0% agarose gels (or on<br />
6% nondenatur<strong>in</strong>g polyacrylamide gels) <strong>in</strong> 1X TBE buffer.<br />
Results and discussion<br />
The n<strong>in</strong>e primer pairs used successfully amplified the correspond<strong>in</strong>g<br />
regions of cpDNA and mtDNA <strong>in</strong> all the materials<br />
<strong>in</strong>vestigated (Table 1), thereby support<strong>in</strong>g the usefulness of<br />
Genetic diversity, evolution, and alien <strong>in</strong>trogression 97
A<br />
bp<br />
6,557<br />
2,322<br />
1,611<br />
M1 5 10 15 20 25 30 M<br />
B M1 5 10 15 20 25 30<br />
6,557<br />
2,322<br />
564<br />
Fig 1. (A) Amplified fragment patterns of<br />
cpDNA <strong>in</strong> the region of psbC-trnS. M = size<br />
marker (λ/H<strong>in</strong>dIII). Lane 1, low-copy type;<br />
lane 2, medium-copy type; lane 5, high-copy<br />
type. (B) The restriction fragment patterns<br />
of four variants detected <strong>in</strong> psbC-trnS/CfoI<br />
from 10 species <strong>in</strong> the genus Oryza. M =<br />
size marker (λ/H<strong>in</strong>dIII). Lanes 1–32: O.<br />
rufipogon, O. latifolia, O. grandiglumis, O.<br />
rufipogon, O. offic<strong>in</strong>alis, O. punctata, O.<br />
grandiglumis, rhizome rice, O. latifolia,<br />
Zizania latifolia, O. m<strong>in</strong>uta, O. offic<strong>in</strong>alis,<br />
Leersia hexandra, O. rufipogon (W1944), O.<br />
sativa (Dawn), O. sativa (Tetep), O.<br />
rufipogon, O. rufipogon, O. rufipogon, O. sativa<br />
(Moroberekan), O. sativa (IRAT104), O.<br />
sativa (Mamoriaka), O. sativa (5167), O.<br />
sativa (68-83), O. rufipogon (Donxiang), O.<br />
rufipogon (Dongxiang), O. meridionalis, O.<br />
meridionalis, O. barthiii, O. sativa (Dianyu<br />
1A), O. sativa (Dianyu 1B), and O. sativa<br />
(Yuza 29F1).<br />
bp<br />
2,322<br />
1,000<br />
564<br />
M 1 5 10 15 20 M<br />
Fig 2. The restriction fragment patterns of<br />
10 variants detected <strong>in</strong> nad4(2)-nad4(3)/<br />
MspI from n<strong>in</strong>e species <strong>in</strong> the genus Oryza.<br />
M = size marker (λ/H<strong>in</strong>dIII + DraI). Lanes<br />
1–20: O. sativa (IR36), O. sativa (T65), O.<br />
grandiglumis (CCDD), O. rufipogon<br />
(W1945), O. offic<strong>in</strong>alis (CC), O. punctata<br />
(BB), O. grandiglumis (CCDD), rhizome rice,<br />
O. latifolia (CCDD), Zizania latifolia, O.<br />
m<strong>in</strong>uta (BBCC), O. offic<strong>in</strong>alis (Yunnan, CN),<br />
Leersia hexandra, O. rufipogon (W1944),<br />
O. punctata (BBCC), O. rufipogon<br />
(Dongxiang, CN), O. meridionalis, O.<br />
meridionalis, O. sativa (Dianyu 1A), and O.<br />
barthii.<br />
this method <strong>in</strong> detect<strong>in</strong>g variation of cpDNA and mtDNA <strong>in</strong><br />
the genus Oryza.<br />
Genetic differentiation of cpDNA<br />
Previous reports (Dally and Second 1990, Chen et al 1993)<br />
and our study results (Table 2) show no specific genetic marker<br />
<strong>in</strong> the region of ORF100 to dist<strong>in</strong>guish the Oryza offic<strong>in</strong>alis<br />
complex from the O. sativa complex. Expectedly, this study<br />
first detected PCR-RFLP markers <strong>in</strong> regions of psbC-trnS (Fig.<br />
1), rbcL-rbcL, and rbcL-ORF106, which permits identification<br />
of the O. offic<strong>in</strong>alis and O. sativa complexes.<br />
Genetic differentiation of mtDNA <strong>in</strong> Oryza<br />
No polymorphism was detected <strong>in</strong> most of the regions of<br />
mtDNA with<strong>in</strong> the genus Oryza. In contrast, strik<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>terspecific<br />
and <strong>in</strong>traspecific variations were detected <strong>in</strong> the region<br />
of nad4(2)-nad4(3) (Fig. 2), suggest<strong>in</strong>g that differentiation of<br />
mtDNA varied from species to species and that <strong>in</strong>dica-japonica<br />
differentiation was dom<strong>in</strong>ant <strong>in</strong> the O. sativa complex (Sun et<br />
al 1996).<br />
The dendrogram of mtDNA among the species produced<br />
by cluster analysis <strong>in</strong>dicates that all cultivated, weedy, and wild<br />
species of the O. sativa complex <strong>in</strong> Asia, Africa, America, and<br />
Oceania fall <strong>in</strong>to the same group and are further differentiated<br />
<strong>in</strong>to <strong>in</strong>dica and japonica types, except for rhizome rice (accession<br />
6209-3, of <strong>IRRI</strong>, may be O. longistam<strong>in</strong>ata), which was<br />
highly divergent from the genus Oryza. Meanwhile, a few<br />
stra<strong>in</strong>s of the Asian O. rufipogon and the African O. barthii<br />
were similar to some species of the O. offic<strong>in</strong>alis complex.<br />
This f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g sheds new light on the orig<strong>in</strong> and differentiation<br />
of cultivated rice (Oka 1988, Second 1986).<br />
Evolutionary significance of cpDNA and mtDNA<br />
Differentiation of cpDNA and mtDNA probably resulted <strong>in</strong><br />
species and/or subspecies diverg<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Oryza. Species-diagnostic<br />
markers of cpDNA and mtDNA were found, reveal<strong>in</strong>g<br />
that differentiation of cpDNA and mtDNA varied from species<br />
to species <strong>in</strong> Oryza. The <strong>in</strong>traspecific variations <strong>in</strong> cpDNA<br />
and mtDNA were detected <strong>in</strong> four species of the O. sativa<br />
complex, <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g that <strong>in</strong>dica-japonica subspecific differentiation<br />
of cpDNA and mtDNA was the dom<strong>in</strong>ant trend <strong>in</strong> the<br />
O. sativa complex. In some regions of the chloroplast and<br />
mitochondrial genomes, the PCR-amplified DNA fragments<br />
seemed to be the same <strong>in</strong> size, but there were differences <strong>in</strong><br />
copy number (Fig. 1A), imply<strong>in</strong>g that the number and size of<br />
the chloroplasts and mitochondria <strong>in</strong> different l<strong>in</strong>es of various<br />
species may be associated with ecological adaptation dur<strong>in</strong>g<br />
the evolutionary process.<br />
98 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
References<br />
Chen WB, Nakamura I, Sato YI, Nakai H. 1993. Distribution of<br />
deletion type <strong>in</strong> cpDNA of cultivated and wild rice. Jpn. J.<br />
Genet. 68:579-603.<br />
Dally A, Second G. 1990. Chloroplast DNA diversity <strong>in</strong> the wild<br />
and cultivated species of rice (Genus Oryza, Section Oryza):<br />
cladistic-mutation and genetic-distance analysis. Theor. Appl.<br />
Genet. 80:209-222.<br />
Demesure B, Sodzi N, Petit RJ. 1995. A set of universal primers for<br />
amplification of polymorphic non-cod<strong>in</strong>g regions of mitochondrial<br />
and chloroplast DNA <strong>in</strong> plants. Mol. Ecol. 4:129-131.<br />
Dumol<strong>in</strong>-Lapegue S, Pemonge MH, Petit RJ. 1997. An enlarged set<br />
of consensus primers for the study of organelle DNA <strong>in</strong> plants.<br />
Mol. Ecol. 6:393-397.<br />
Ge S, Sang T, Lu BR, Hong DY. 1999. Phylogeny of rice genomes<br />
with emphasis on orig<strong>in</strong>s of allotetraploid species. Proc. Natl.<br />
Acad. Sci. USA 96(25):14400-14405.<br />
Hiratsuka J et al. 1989. The complete sequence of the rice (Oryza<br />
sativa) chloroplast genome: <strong>in</strong>termolecular recomb<strong>in</strong>ation<br />
between dist<strong>in</strong>ct tRNA genes accounts for a major plastid DNA<br />
<strong>in</strong>version dur<strong>in</strong>g the evolution of cereals. Mol. Gen. Genet.<br />
217:185-194.<br />
Ishii T, Terachi T, Mori N, Tsunewaki K. 1993. Comparative study<br />
on the chloroplast, mitochondrial and nuclear genome differentiation<br />
<strong>in</strong> two cultivated rice species, Oryza sativa and Oryza<br />
glaberrima, by RFLP analysis. Theor. Appl. Genet. 86:88-<br />
96.<br />
Iwahashi M, Nakazono M, Kanno A, Sug<strong>in</strong>o K, Ishibashi T, Hirai<br />
A. 1992. Genetic and physical maps and a clone bank of mitochondria<br />
DNA from rice. Theor. Appl. Genet. 84:275-279.<br />
Khush GS. 1997. Orig<strong>in</strong>, dispersal, cultivation and variation of rice.<br />
Plant Mol. Biol. 35:25-34.<br />
Oka HI, editor. 1988. Orig<strong>in</strong> of cultivated rice. Jpn Sci. Soc. Press,<br />
Tokyo/Elsevier, Amsterdam. 254 p.<br />
Parani M, Lakshmi M, Ziegenhagen B, Fladung M, Senthilkumar P,<br />
Parida A. 2000. Molecular phylogeny of mangroves. VII. PCR-<br />
RFLP of trnS-psbC and rbcL gene regions <strong>in</strong> 24 mangrove<br />
and mangrove-associate species. Theor. Appl. Genet. 100:454-<br />
460.<br />
Parducci L, Szmidt AE. 1999. PCR-RFLP analysis of cpDNA <strong>in</strong> the<br />
genus Abies. Theor. Appl. Genet. 98:802-808.<br />
Second G. 1986. Isozymes and phylogenetic relationship <strong>in</strong> Oryza.<br />
In: <strong>Rice</strong> genetics. Manila (Philipp<strong>in</strong>es): <strong>International</strong> <strong>Rice</strong><br />
Research Institute. p 27-39.<br />
Sun CQ, Wang XK, Yoshimura A, Iwata N. 1996. Genetic differentiation<br />
of mitochondrial DNA <strong>in</strong> common wild rice (Oryza<br />
rufipogon Griff) and cultivated rice (Oryza sativa L.). In: A<br />
collection of papers on orig<strong>in</strong> and dissem<strong>in</strong>ation of cultivated<br />
rice <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a. Beij<strong>in</strong>g Agricultural University of Ch<strong>in</strong>a Press.<br />
p 134-139.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ address: Laboratory of Plant <strong>Genetics</strong> and Breed<strong>in</strong>g, Department<br />
of Bio-Resources, College of Natural Resources,<br />
Yeungnam University, Kyongsan 712-749, Republic of Korea.<br />
Fax: (053)816-2814, e-mail: chenlijuan@hotmail.com.<br />
Evolutionary significance of varietal groups resistant<br />
to bacterial leaf blight <strong>in</strong> rice<br />
T. Ogawa, N. Endo, G.A. Busto Jr., R.E. Tabien, S. Taura, and G.S. Khush<br />
Intraspecific variation <strong>in</strong> rice has been of great importance <strong>in</strong> breed<strong>in</strong>g. No s<strong>in</strong>gle character is believed to be a criterion of<br />
varietal differentiation; however, a reaction pattern to bacterial leaf blight (BB) races led to the natural formation of varietal<br />
groups. The diversity of each varietal group was supported by isozyme classification as well as DNA analysis. The genes for BB<br />
resistance and isozyme loci are located on different chromosomes. This dispersed nature of gene location is not simply<br />
<strong>in</strong>terpreted as due to genetic l<strong>in</strong>kage. Hence, it could be proposed that varietal differentiation as a result of evolutionary<br />
dynamics dur<strong>in</strong>g domestication is closely l<strong>in</strong>ked to varietal groups resistant to BB.<br />
Bacterial leaf blight (BB) caused by Xanthomonas oryzae pv.<br />
oryzae is one of the major diseases of rice <strong>in</strong> Asian countries.<br />
Because of the <strong>in</strong>effectiveness of bactericidal agents, reliance<br />
on the use of plant resistance is considerably high. S<strong>in</strong>ce the<br />
first report of this disease <strong>in</strong> 1962, a systematic study has been<br />
conducted at the <strong>International</strong> <strong>Rice</strong> Research Institute (<strong>IRRI</strong>)<br />
and <strong>in</strong> Japan. After a series of <strong>in</strong>oculation tests, Ogawa et al<br />
(1991) found that different resistance genes seem to l<strong>in</strong>k to<br />
different ecotypes of rice. This report presents results on resistance<br />
to BB and the significance of varietal groups.<br />
BB resistance and varietal groups<br />
S<strong>in</strong>ce 1983, a series of <strong>in</strong>oculation tests has been conducted at<br />
<strong>IRRI</strong>. Varieties com<strong>in</strong>g from one country were <strong>in</strong>oculated as a<br />
group: 1,000 varieties per country at random. Native varieties<br />
were classified <strong>in</strong>to n<strong>in</strong>e groups (Table 1, Ogawa et al 1998).<br />
The Java14, TKM6, DZ192, CAS209, and TN1 groups conta<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
several varieties (major group), while the Mond Ba,<br />
DV85, Makhmal Mehi, and BJ 1 groups <strong>in</strong>cluded a few varieties<br />
only (m<strong>in</strong>or group). Because of the presence of natural<br />
genes, five major varietal groups were formed.<br />
Genetic diversity, evolution, and alien <strong>in</strong>trogression 99
Table 1. Patterns of reaction to Philipp<strong>in</strong>e races of bacterial blight (BB) and associated ecotypes and ma<strong>in</strong> distribution (summarized from<br />
Ogawa et al 1998).<br />
Varietal Reaction pattern to BB races a Estimated Associated<br />
group gene ecotype Ma<strong>in</strong> geographical distribution<br />
1 2 3 4 5 6<br />
Java14 RB RB RB RB RB S Xa3 Japonica Korea, Ch<strong>in</strong>a, Laos, Philipp<strong>in</strong>es, and Indonesia<br />
TKM6 R S S MR RB S Xa4 Aman, Tjereh Bangladesh, India (central and southern parts),<br />
Sri Lanka, Indonesia, Cambodia, and Myanmar<br />
DZ192 R R R MS R S xa5 Aus, boro Bangladesh, Nepal, India (northern area), and<br />
Pakistan<br />
CAS209 S HR S S R S Xa10 Aman Vietnam, Myanmar, and India<br />
Mond Ba R HR S MR R MS Xa4 + xa10 Aman Vietnam, Myanmar, and India<br />
DV85 HR HR HR R HR MS xa5 + Xa7 Boro, Aus Vietnam, Myanmar, and India<br />
Makhmal Mehi R R R R R MS Xa4 + xa5 Aman, boro, aus Vietnam, Myanmar, and India<br />
BJ1 R R R R R R xa5 + xa13 Boro, aus Vietnam, Myanmar, and India<br />
TN1 S S S S R S Xa14 Indica, japonica Malaysia, Vietnam, and Ch<strong>in</strong>a<br />
a RB = resistant with brown<strong>in</strong>g marg<strong>in</strong> around the lesion, S = susceptible, R = resistant, MR = moderately resistant, HR = highly resistant, MS = moderately susceptible.<br />
Java14 group (Xa3)<br />
Varieties <strong>in</strong> the Java14 group were resistant to four Philipp<strong>in</strong>e<br />
races and developed brownish areas around the lesion (Table<br />
1). They showed similar morphology: round gra<strong>in</strong>, long awn,<br />
long panicle, and limited tiller<strong>in</strong>g. This morphology <strong>in</strong>dicates<br />
that they belong to the bulu type (tropical japonica, upland<br />
rice, or javanica). Varieties <strong>in</strong> this group come from wider areas<br />
than varieties <strong>in</strong> other groups, but ma<strong>in</strong>ly from Korea,<br />
Ch<strong>in</strong>a, Laos, the Philipp<strong>in</strong>es, and Indonesia.<br />
TKM6 group (Xa4)<br />
Varieties of the TKM6 group were resistant to race 1 and moderately<br />
resistant to race 4 but were susceptible to races 2 and 3<br />
(Table 1). This reaction pattern was similar to that of IR20 and<br />
the resistance of IR20 was <strong>in</strong>troduced from TKM6. This group<br />
was therefore designated as the TKM6 group. Varieties <strong>in</strong> this<br />
group showed the morphology of a typical <strong>in</strong>dica; they come<br />
ma<strong>in</strong>ly from Bangladesh, India (central and southern areas),<br />
Sri Lanka, Indonesia, Cambodia, and Myanmar.<br />
DZ192 group (xa5) and related varietal groups<br />
Varieties of the DZ192 group were mostly resistant to races 1,<br />
2, and 3 but moderately resistant to race 4 (Table 1). Genetic<br />
analysis showed three m<strong>in</strong>or groups: DV85 group (Xa7 and<br />
xa5), Makhmal Mehi group (Xa4 and xa5), and BJ 1 group<br />
(xa5 and xa13). Varieties of this group mostly showed the<br />
morphology of aus or boro and were ma<strong>in</strong>ly from Bangladesh,<br />
Nepal, India (northern area), and Pakistan.<br />
CAS209 group (Xa10) and Mond Ba group<br />
(Xa4 + Xa10)<br />
The reaction of the CAS209 group was dist<strong>in</strong>ct: resistant to<br />
only race 2 when races 1 to 4 were <strong>in</strong>oculated (Table 1). Some<br />
varieties showed high resistance to race 2, resistance to race 1,<br />
moderate resistance to race 4, and susceptibility to race 3. These<br />
varieties had Xa4 and Xa10. This reaction pattern was first<br />
noted <strong>in</strong> variety Mond Ba, so the group was denoted as the<br />
Mond Ba group. Varieties belong<strong>in</strong>g to the CAS209 and Mond<br />
Ba groups ma<strong>in</strong>ly come from Vietnam, Myanmar, and India.<br />
TN1 group (Xa14)<br />
After f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g races 5 and 6, we carried out the test us<strong>in</strong>g these<br />
two races. We found that TN1 showed a specific reaction: resistant<br />
only to race 5 and susceptible to other races (Table 1).<br />
Genetic analysis confirmed a new gene (Xa14) (Taura et al<br />
1992), and we denoted this group as the TN1 group. Varieties<br />
of this group are ma<strong>in</strong>ly distributed <strong>in</strong> Malaysia, Vietnam, and<br />
Ch<strong>in</strong>a.<br />
Isozyme types and related characteristics<br />
of each varietal group<br />
These varietal groups underwent isozyme classification as established<br />
by Glaszmann (1987). The Java14 group <strong>in</strong>volved<br />
almost all the isozyme types and type VI was predom<strong>in</strong>ant<br />
(Table 2). In contrast, the majority of the DZ192 group was<br />
type II. All varieties of the TKM6 group consisted of type I<br />
and <strong>in</strong>termediate types (IM) only. Most varieties of the CAS209<br />
and Mond Ba groups were type I. The TN1 group was found<br />
to have either type I or VI. Further analysis revealed that some<br />
allele comb<strong>in</strong>ations were specific to a particular group (Table<br />
2). With isozyme type II, the co-presence of Amp1-2 and Amp2-<br />
2 was predom<strong>in</strong>ant <strong>in</strong> the DZ192 group, whereas the comb<strong>in</strong>ation<br />
of Amp1-1 and Amp2-1 was peculiar to the Java14 group.<br />
This k<strong>in</strong>d of difference prompted further excit<strong>in</strong>g possibilities<br />
that a different allele comb<strong>in</strong>ation could l<strong>in</strong>k to different phenotypes:<br />
for <strong>in</strong>stance, a colored brown rice was very frequent<br />
<strong>in</strong> type II of the DZ192 group, while noncolored gra<strong>in</strong> was<br />
popular <strong>in</strong> type II of the Java14 group. For photoperiod sensitivity,<br />
the majority of the Java14 (type VI) and DZ192 (type<br />
II) groups were classified as photoperiod-<strong>in</strong>sensitive, whereas<br />
almost all varieties of the CAS209 (type I) group were highly<br />
photoperiod-sensitive (Table 2). Half of the TKM6 (type I)<br />
group was photoperiod-<strong>in</strong>sensitive. When brown rice color was<br />
100 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
Table 2. Morphological and physiological characteristics associated with bacterial blight-resistant groups.<br />
Characteristics Java14(Xa3) TKM6(Xa4) DZ192(xa5) CAS209(Xa10) TN1(Xa14)<br />
%<br />
Isozyme type I a<br />
Type I with Amp1 1 (typical <strong>in</strong>dica) 4 79 4 77 83<br />
Type I with Amp1 4 (typical <strong>in</strong>dica) – 4 * b 17 3<br />
Type II with Amp1 2 and Amp2 2 (aus, boro) * – 66 – –<br />
Type II with Amp1 1 and Amp1 2 (aus, boro) 8 – * – –<br />
Othe type II (aus, boro) – – 19 * 70<br />
Type III (deepwater varieties) – – 4 * –<br />
Type IV (float<strong>in</strong>g rice) * – – – –<br />
Type V (basmati from Myanmar to Iran) 6 – – 2 *<br />
Type VI (japonica rice: ken, bulu, upland) 71 – * – 13<br />
Intermediate (IM) type 9 17 5 3 *<br />
Photosensitivity<br />
Sensitive * * 48 99 –<br />
Insensitive 99 99 52 * –<br />
Brown rice<br />
Colored 8 88 59 14 –<br />
Noncolored 92 12 41 86 –<br />
Indica-japonica classification c<br />
Indica type 50 100 100 100 88<br />
Japonica type 50 – – – 12<br />
Phenol color reaction c<br />
Ph (+) 18 98 79 92 44<br />
Ph (–) 82 2 21 8 56<br />
KClO 3 resistance c<br />
K-resistant 61 15 5 13 23<br />
K-susceptible 39 85 95 87 77<br />
a Isozyme types were summarized from Endo and Ogawa (1997). b *=less than 1%. c Indica-japonica types were summarized from Endo et<br />
al (1998). Ph and K values were the determ<strong>in</strong>ants of the <strong>in</strong>dica-japonica classification.<br />
contrasted, noncolored rice was predom<strong>in</strong>ant <strong>in</strong> the CAS209<br />
group, while the colored and noncolored gra<strong>in</strong>s were mixed<br />
half and half <strong>in</strong> the TKM6 group. These observations suggest<br />
that phenotypic diversity was l<strong>in</strong>ked with the diversity of<br />
isozyme genotypes.<br />
Morphological and physiological characters for varietal<br />
differentiation<br />
In the past, many different morphological and physiological<br />
criteria have been used to classify rice ecotypes. Mor<strong>in</strong>aga<br />
(1968) considered several rice ecotypes as a unit to study diversity,<br />
whereas a phylogenetic l<strong>in</strong>eage group<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>in</strong>dica and<br />
japonica types has been widely used (Matsuo 1952, Oka 1958,<br />
Sato 1991). These l<strong>in</strong>eage classifications are essentially based<br />
on the idea that some discrete groups are def<strong>in</strong>ed a priori. Yet,<br />
naturally formed BB varietal groups are studied.<br />
Indica-japonica classification<br />
Follow<strong>in</strong>g the method described <strong>in</strong> Sato (1991), <strong>in</strong>dica and<br />
japonica types were classified (Endo et al 1998). The japonica<br />
type was <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> only half of the Java14 group, followed<br />
by 10% of the TN1 group, that is, a great majority was <strong>in</strong>dica<br />
type (Table 2). For isozyme type VI, almost half was japonica<br />
type <strong>in</strong> the Java14 group, whereas all isozyme type VI was<br />
japonica type <strong>in</strong> the TN1 group. Isozyme type VI of the TN1<br />
group ma<strong>in</strong>ly comes from Ch<strong>in</strong>a, while isozyme type VI of the<br />
Java14 group is distributed widely <strong>in</strong> Asia (Table 1). It seems<br />
that japonica corresponds to type VI <strong>in</strong> an East Asian cl<strong>in</strong>e.<br />
Alkali degradation is another criterion to separate tropical and<br />
temperate japonicas (Oka 1958), but no clear divid<strong>in</strong>g po<strong>in</strong>t<br />
has been detected (Ogawa et al 1998). When isozyme type VI<br />
of the TN1 group was compared with that of the Java14 group,<br />
varieties of the TN1 group tended to have KOH susceptibility,<br />
whereas Indonesian varieties (bulu) of the Java14 group showed<br />
tendencies rang<strong>in</strong>g from resistance to susceptibility. This supports<br />
the conclusion that the determ<strong>in</strong>ant of the <strong>in</strong>dica-japonica<br />
classification can be ascribed to the East Asian cl<strong>in</strong>e.<br />
Gra<strong>in</strong>-shape variation<br />
With gra<strong>in</strong> shape as a criterion, as proposed by Matsuo (1952),<br />
the follow<strong>in</strong>g classification can be made: japonica is A type,<br />
javanica is B type, and <strong>in</strong>dica is C type. Gra<strong>in</strong>-shape variation,<br />
however, was not dist<strong>in</strong>ct among the BB varietal groups, except<br />
for the TN1 group (see details <strong>in</strong> Ogawa et al 1998), nor<br />
among isozyme types I, II, and VI. In the TN1 group, isozyme<br />
type VI tended toward the A zone, while type I was scattered<br />
<strong>in</strong> the C zone (Fig. 1). When the East Asian isozymes (type<br />
VI) were plotted, those varieties tended toward the A zone, as<br />
well as type VI orig<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g from Bangladesh and northern In-<br />
Genetic diversity, evolution, and alien <strong>in</strong>trogression 101
Frequency (%)<br />
70 A<br />
Non-Asia<br />
Spikelet length (mm)<br />
11<br />
B<br />
10<br />
Type 1<br />
Type VI<br />
50<br />
Indonesia<br />
9<br />
60<br />
Philipp<strong>in</strong>es<br />
8<br />
80<br />
Southeast Asia<br />
7<br />
50<br />
Bangladesh<br />
6<br />
2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5<br />
Spikelet width (mm)<br />
80<br />
Korea, Ch<strong>in</strong>a, Taiwan (Ch<strong>in</strong>a)<br />
80<br />
Japan<br />
1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0<br />
Length/width ratio<br />
Fig. 1. Gra<strong>in</strong>-shape variation of<br />
the Java14 group (A) and the<br />
TN1 group (B).<br />
Table 3. F 1 seed fertility a (upper orthogonal) and coefficients between genetic distance b and F 1 seed fertility (lower<br />
orthogonal).<br />
Varietal Java 14 group DZ192 group TKM6 group CAS209 group<br />
group Gene<br />
M<strong>in</strong>. Av Max. M<strong>in</strong>. Av Max. M<strong>in</strong>. Av Max. M<strong>in</strong>. Av Max.<br />
Java14 Xa3 2.8 78.7 97.4 0.9 49.3 97.8 4.7 34.8 79.1 0.8 53.7 95.7<br />
(0.80)<br />
DZ192 xa5 26.2 68.1 94.3 37.3 67.3 96.0 24.0 76.1 96.9<br />
(0.83) (0.88)<br />
TKM6 Xa4 24.7 79.2 96.1 20.2 80.5 97.6<br />
(0.75) (0.91) (0.91)<br />
CAS209 Xa10 5.4 67.6 92.3<br />
(0.56) (0.91) (0.93) (0.88)<br />
TN1 Xa14<br />
(–) (–) (–) (–)<br />
a F 1 seed fertility was adjusted from Ogawa et al (1998), show<strong>in</strong>g m<strong>in</strong>imum (m<strong>in</strong>.), average (av), and maximum (max.). b Genetic distance (Nei<br />
1987) was calculated based on polymerase cha<strong>in</strong> reaction analysis with random primers.<br />
dia (data shown as length-width ratio <strong>in</strong> Fig. 1). Thus, a geographic<br />
cl<strong>in</strong>e toward East Asia as well as northern India was<br />
shown for gra<strong>in</strong>-shape variation.<br />
F 1<br />
seed fertility and genetic diversity<br />
Seed fertility was <strong>in</strong>itially used as a criterion, lead<strong>in</strong>g to two<br />
groups as subspecies <strong>in</strong>dica and japonica (Kato 1930). At this<br />
po<strong>in</strong>t, we crossed representative varieties (see details <strong>in</strong> Ogawa<br />
et al 1998) and random amplified polymorphic DNA analysis<br />
was applied to study genetic diversity. It was found that F 1<br />
seed fertility varied not only between groups but also with<strong>in</strong><br />
groups, depend<strong>in</strong>g on the <strong>in</strong>dividual comb<strong>in</strong>ation (Table 3).<br />
The results suggest that variation <strong>in</strong> F 1 seed fertility is essentially<br />
on an <strong>in</strong>dividual basis with less association with varietal<br />
group, presumably reflect<strong>in</strong>g specific genes for sterility. This<br />
idea is supported by the correlation analysis between F 1 seed<br />
fertility and the genetic distance def<strong>in</strong>ed by Nei (1987): the<br />
correlation coefficient was very high both between and with<strong>in</strong><br />
groups.<br />
102 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
References<br />
Endo N, Ogawa T. 1997. Breed. Sci. 47:237-243.<br />
Endo N, Taura S, Akiyoshi M, Ogawa T. 1998. Relationship between<br />
the cultivar groups resistant to rice bacterial blight and<br />
<strong>in</strong>dica-japonica classification. Breed. Sci. 48:349-353.<br />
Glaszmann JC. 1987. Isozymes and classification of Asian rice varieties.<br />
Theor. Appl. Genet. 74:21-30.<br />
Matsuo T. 1952. Geneaological studies on cultivated rice. Bull. Nat.<br />
Inst. Agric. Sci. D 3:1-11.<br />
Mor<strong>in</strong>aga T. 1968. Trop. Agric. Res. Ser. 3:1-15.<br />
Nei M. 1987. Phylogenetic trees. In: Molecular evolutionary genetics.<br />
New York (USA): Columbia University Press. p 287-326.<br />
Ogawa T, Busto GA, Tabien RE, Romero GO, Endo N, Khush GS.<br />
1991. Group<strong>in</strong>g of rice cultivars based on reaction pattern to<br />
Philipp<strong>in</strong>e races of bacterial blight pathogens (Xanthomonas<br />
campestris pv. oryzae). Jpn. J. Breed. 41:109-119.<br />
Ogawa T, Endo N, Busto Jr. GA, Tabien RE, Taura S, Khush GS.<br />
1998. Res. Rep. Agric. Dev. Hokuriku Area No. 40:1-180.<br />
Oka HI. 1958. Intervarietal variation and classification of cultivated<br />
rice. Indian J. Genet. Plant Breed. 18:79-89.<br />
Sato YI. 1991. Variation <strong>in</strong> spikelet shape of the <strong>in</strong>dica and japonica<br />
rice cultivars of Asian orig<strong>in</strong>. Jpn. J. Breed. 41:121-134.<br />
Taura S, Ogawa T, Tabien RE, Khush GS, Yoshimura A, Omura T.<br />
1992. Resistance gene of rice cultivar, Taichung Native, to<br />
Philipp<strong>in</strong>e races of bacterial blight pathogens. Jpn. J. Breed.<br />
42:195-201.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ addresses: T. Ogawa, Chugoku National Agricultural Experiment<br />
Station, Fukuyama, Hiroshima, Japan; N. Endo, Biotechnology<br />
Research Center, Taisei Corporation, Narash<strong>in</strong>o,<br />
Chiba, Japan; G.A. Busto Jr. and G.S. Khush, Plant Breed<strong>in</strong>g,<br />
<strong>Genetics</strong>, and Biochemistry Division, <strong>IRRI</strong>, Philipp<strong>in</strong>es; R.E.<br />
Tabien, Phil<strong>Rice</strong>, Maligaya, 3119 Muñoz, Nueva Ecija, Philipp<strong>in</strong>es;<br />
S. Taura, Gene Research Center, Kagoshima University,<br />
Kagoshima, Japan.<br />
<strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice chromosome research, 1995-2000<br />
K. Fukui<br />
The most significant accomplishment <strong>in</strong> rice chromosome research dur<strong>in</strong>g the last 5 years has been the development of<br />
fluorescence <strong>in</strong> situ hybridization (FISH) methods. Now, these methods are rout<strong>in</strong>ely used to localize genes of practical importance<br />
on rice chromosomes. Three new rice genomes of G, H, and J were designated 36 years after the assignment of the F<br />
genome <strong>in</strong> 1961. The orientation of the molecular l<strong>in</strong>kage map of rice has been atta<strong>in</strong>ed for the first time us<strong>in</strong>g secondary<br />
trisomics and telotrisomics. <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice chromosome research are summarized by (1) molecular cytology, (2) genomeand<br />
chromosome-related research, and (3) new technologies.<br />
<strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice chromosome research dur<strong>in</strong>g the last few years<br />
have been characterized by three features. First, dramatic improvement<br />
was atta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> molecular cytology, expand<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
target material from chromosomes to DNA fibers. S<strong>in</strong>gle-copy<br />
genes can be localized on rice chromosomes. Moreover, genomic<br />
<strong>in</strong> situ hybridization (GISH) became useful <strong>in</strong> breed<strong>in</strong>g<br />
programs. Second, three new rice genomes were assigned by<br />
Southern hybridization methods <strong>in</strong>stead of conventional cytological<br />
observation of the meiotic configuration of homologous<br />
chromosomes. The rice centromeres have been mapped<br />
on l<strong>in</strong>kage maps and the orientation of the molecular l<strong>in</strong>kage<br />
map was presented. Third, new technologies have cont<strong>in</strong>uously<br />
been developed <strong>in</strong> the field of rice chromosome research. The<br />
clon<strong>in</strong>g of a functional doma<strong>in</strong> of rice chromosomes, the development<br />
of new software to analyze rice pachytene chromosomes,<br />
and the identification of rice chromosome organization<br />
with<strong>in</strong> a nucleus will be reviewed. The effectiveness of<br />
the molecular cytological approaches to rice genome research<br />
has been reviewed earlier (Fukui and Ohmido 2000a).<br />
<strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> molecular cytology<br />
Fluorescence <strong>in</strong> situ hybridization (FISH)<br />
The first reproducible rice FISH results were reported <strong>in</strong> 1994<br />
us<strong>in</strong>g 45S rDNA as the probe (Fukui et al 1994). Then, the<br />
development of FISH methods <strong>in</strong> rice chromosome research<br />
went far beyond what we had expected (Fukui 1996). Major<br />
advances <strong>in</strong> FISH on rice chromosomes <strong>in</strong>clude (1) the target<br />
nucleotide sequences were broadened from repeated genes,<br />
such as ribosomal RNA genes, to s<strong>in</strong>gle-copy DNA sequences;<br />
(2) the target materials were broadened from somatic chromosomes<br />
to DNA fibers; and (3) a s<strong>in</strong>gle color was used to detect<br />
fluorescent signals before; now, many colors can be used simultaneously.<br />
As a result, several useful genes, which are sometimes<br />
s<strong>in</strong>gle-copy genes, were physically mapped on the rice chromosomes.<br />
Useful genes, Gm2, Pib, Xa21, and an RFLP marker<br />
(Xnp247), etc., have successfully been visualized on rice chromosomes.<br />
The genes detected were often located at the termi-<br />
Genetic diversity, evolution, and alien <strong>in</strong>trogression 103
A B C<br />
D<br />
E<br />
nal regions, suggest<strong>in</strong>g the concentrated localization of transcriptionally<br />
active genes at the term<strong>in</strong>al regions of rice chromosomes.<br />
Shishido et al (1996) detected the third 45S rDNA<br />
locus <strong>in</strong> Oryza eich<strong>in</strong>geri (CC) by FISH. A peculiar distribution<br />
of rDNA loci has been found <strong>in</strong> rice genomes different<br />
from coll<strong>in</strong>earity among rice and other cereal species.<br />
FISH on extended DNA fibers (EDF-FISH)<br />
Recent visualization methods allow us to directly see even<br />
s<strong>in</strong>gle DNA molecules under a fluorescence microscope. Extension<br />
of repetitive sequences was visualized on DNA fibers<br />
by the FISH method target<strong>in</strong>g DNA fibers. After FISH on extended<br />
DNA fibers (EDF-FISH) us<strong>in</strong>g tandem repeat sequence<br />
A (TrsA) and telomere sequences as probes, dot-like fluorescent<br />
signal tracks of TrsA and telomere sequences were visualized<br />
(Ohmido et al 2001). By us<strong>in</strong>g EDF-FISH, the amounts<br />
of four different repetitive sequences of 45S rDNA, 5S rDNA,<br />
telomere sequences, and TrsA between <strong>in</strong>dica and japonica<br />
rice were compared. As a result, <strong>in</strong>dica showed higher contents<br />
of all four repetitive sequences. It is thus concluded that<br />
the FISH method, especially on DNA fibers, contributes much<br />
to quantitative analyses of the copy number of the genes and<br />
repetitive sequences.<br />
Genomic <strong>in</strong> situ hybridization (GISH)<br />
GISH is the method of pa<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g chromosomes belong<strong>in</strong>g to<br />
different genomes with different colors. Although GISH <strong>in</strong> rice<br />
was developed earlier by Fukui et al (1997), it has made much<br />
progress more recently. These authors detected the fluorescent<br />
signal from the genomic DNA of O. offic<strong>in</strong>alis (CC) on<br />
the C-genome chromosomes <strong>in</strong> O. m<strong>in</strong>uta (BBCC) and O.<br />
latifolia (CCDD). They have shown that the phylogenetic distance<br />
between the C and D genomes is closer than that between<br />
B and C by compar<strong>in</strong>g fluorescence <strong>in</strong>tensity among<br />
the chromosomes <strong>in</strong> different genomes. Multicolored GISH <strong>in</strong><br />
rice was used to detect the specific elim<strong>in</strong>ation of chromosomes<br />
<strong>in</strong> the B and C genomes <strong>in</strong> somatic hybrids with A (O.<br />
sativa), B, and C (O. punctata) genomes. The three different<br />
genomes were pa<strong>in</strong>ted differently and chromosome reduction<br />
<strong>in</strong> the specific genomes was unequivocally revealed. GISH is<br />
also used to monitor chromosomal behavior <strong>in</strong> wide crosses<br />
(Abbasi et al 1999).<br />
<strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> genome- and chromosome-related research<br />
New rice genomes and genome organization<br />
Three new genomes were assigned by molecular means. Six<br />
genomes from A to F had been reported and accepted to date.<br />
After the assignment of the F genome <strong>in</strong> 1961, no report appeared<br />
until the G (O. meyeriana), H, and J (O. ridleyi) genomes<br />
were reported (Aggarwal et al 1997). These three new<br />
genomes were assigned not by conventional hybridization experiments<br />
followed by observation of meiotic configuration<br />
but by genomic DNA hybridization.<br />
Dong and Jiang (1998) reported a three-dimensional organization<br />
of rice chromosomes with<strong>in</strong> a rice nucleus. Us<strong>in</strong>g<br />
the FISH method with telomere- and centromere-specific sequences,<br />
they found no fixed allocation of rice chromosomes<br />
with<strong>in</strong> a nucleus (Rabl pattern) but a more or less random distribution<br />
of telomeres and centromeres with<strong>in</strong> a nucleus. This<br />
104 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
tendency is common among plant species with a smaller genome<br />
size. Telomere sequences with<strong>in</strong> a nucleus have shown<br />
random distribution.<br />
Centromere mapp<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>in</strong>trogression l<strong>in</strong>es,<br />
and the rice B chromosome<br />
Us<strong>in</strong>g secondary trisomics, telotrisomics, and RFLP markers,<br />
the positions of the centromeres on rice chromosomes were<br />
located and the correct orientation of l<strong>in</strong>kage maps obta<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
(S<strong>in</strong>gh et al 1996). Wang et al (2000) also mapped centromeric<br />
regions on the molecular l<strong>in</strong>kage map us<strong>in</strong>g centromereassociated<br />
sequences.<br />
Efforts <strong>in</strong> develop<strong>in</strong>g alien <strong>in</strong>trogression l<strong>in</strong>es cont<strong>in</strong>ue<br />
by us<strong>in</strong>g all the wild species that represent the A, B, C, BC,<br />
CD, E, F, G, and HJ genomes at <strong>IRRI</strong>. A series of hybrids and<br />
monosomic alien addition l<strong>in</strong>es have successfully been produced<br />
through an embryo rescue method, especially after remote<br />
hybridization. Several useful traits—such as cytoplasmic<br />
male sterility and resistance genes for grassy stunt virus,<br />
bacterial blight, blast, brown planthopper, etc.—have been<br />
<strong>in</strong>troduced (Brar and Khush 1997). These efforts are urgently<br />
needed to broaden the rice gene pool by <strong>in</strong>trogress<strong>in</strong>g genes<br />
from diverse sources.<br />
<strong>Rice</strong> B chromosomes were found <strong>in</strong> a rice aneuploid<br />
variation among the progenies of triploid Zhongxian 3037<br />
(Cheng et al 2000). Molecular markers on all 24 arms of the<br />
rice chromosomes did not show any dosage effects; therefore,<br />
B chromosomes might not have orig<strong>in</strong>ated from any A-chromosome<br />
fragments.<br />
<strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> new technologies <strong>in</strong> rice chromosome research<br />
The use of imag<strong>in</strong>g technologies <strong>in</strong> the construction of the rice<br />
somatic chromosome map and pachytene chromosome map,<br />
clon<strong>in</strong>g of functional doma<strong>in</strong>s of rice chromosomes or centromeres,<br />
precise measurement of genome sizes of several rice<br />
species by flow cytometry, and other technologies have been<br />
reported <strong>in</strong> the last few years. Uozu et al (1997) reported genome<br />
sizes of several rice species and revealed a strict relationship<br />
between genome size and chromosome morphology.<br />
A quantitative chromosome map of <strong>in</strong>dica rice (IR36) has been<br />
constructed by means of image analysis methods. Imag<strong>in</strong>g<br />
methods have been shown to be effective to quantitatively develop<br />
the rice somatic chromosome map (Fukui and Iijima<br />
1991). The third-generation image-analyz<strong>in</strong>g system, CHIAS<br />
3, has been developed. Furthermore, software for the analysis<br />
of pachytene chromosomes is be<strong>in</strong>g developed. Based on the<br />
prelim<strong>in</strong>ary analysis of rice chromosome 9 with a nucleolar<br />
organiz<strong>in</strong>g region (NOR), large differences have been found<br />
among three maps prepared from somatic chromosomes,<br />
pachytene chromosomes, and a molecular map, especially at<br />
the satellite regions. The result <strong>in</strong>dicates that different maps<br />
conta<strong>in</strong> different biological <strong>in</strong>formation and that <strong>in</strong>tegration<br />
of these maps is important.<br />
<strong>Rice</strong> centromeric sequences are be<strong>in</strong>g analyzed to produce<br />
a rice artificial chromosome. All the rice chromosomes<br />
have an Arabidopsis-type telomere at the ends of the chromosomes.<br />
Clon<strong>in</strong>g of a functional centromere is an important step<br />
toward construct<strong>in</strong>g rice artificial chromosomes. Nonomura<br />
and Kurata (1999) cloned a 264-bp sequence (RCS1516) by<br />
PCR us<strong>in</strong>g CENP-B box-like sequences (CBLS). They characterized<br />
the structure of a 14-kb centromere sequence <strong>in</strong> the<br />
rice genome that <strong>in</strong>cludes 1.9-kb direct repeats.<br />
In conclusion, rice chromosome research has developed<br />
rapidly, <strong>in</strong>troduc<strong>in</strong>g new technologies and giv<strong>in</strong>g new results.<br />
We anticipate that rice chromosome research will become more<br />
advanced and will provide <strong>in</strong>dispensable <strong>in</strong>formation for rice<br />
breed<strong>in</strong>g, genetics, and genome research.<br />
References<br />
Abbasi FM, Brar DS, Carpena AL, Fukui K, Khush GS. 1999. Detection<br />
of autosyndetic and allosyndetic pair<strong>in</strong>g among A and<br />
E genomes of Oryza through genomic <strong>in</strong> situ hybridization.<br />
<strong>Rice</strong> Genet. Newsl. 16:24-25.<br />
Aggarwal RK, Brar DS, Khush GS. 1997. Two new genomes <strong>in</strong> the<br />
Oryza complex identified on the basis of molecular divergence<br />
analysis us<strong>in</strong>g total genomic DNA hybridization. Mol. Gen.<br />
Genet. 254:1-12.<br />
Brar DS, Khush GS. 1997. Alien <strong>in</strong>trogression <strong>in</strong> rice. Plant Mol.<br />
Biol. 35:35-47.<br />
Cheng ZK, Yu HX, Yan HH, Gu MH, Zhu LH. 2000. B chromosome<br />
<strong>in</strong> a rice aneuploid variation. Theor. Appl. Genet.<br />
101:564-568.<br />
Dong F, Jiang J. 1998. Non-Rabl patterns of centromere and telomere<br />
distribution <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>terphase nuclei of plant cells. Chromosome<br />
Res. 6:551-558.<br />
Fukui K. 1996. <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice chromosome research, 1990-1995.<br />
In: Khush GS, editor. <strong>Rice</strong> genetics III. Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs of the<br />
3rd <strong>International</strong> <strong>Rice</strong> <strong>Genetics</strong> Symposium, 16-20 Oct 1995.<br />
Manila (Philipp<strong>in</strong>es): <strong>International</strong> <strong>Rice</strong> Research Institute.<br />
p 117-130.<br />
Fukui K, Iijima K. 1991. Somatic chromosome map of rice by imag<strong>in</strong>g<br />
methods. Theor. Appl. Genet. 81:589-596.<br />
Fukui K, Ohmido N. 2000a. <strong>Rice</strong> genome research: an alternative<br />
approach based on molecular cytology. In: Gustafson JP, editor.<br />
Genomes. New York (USA): Kluwer Academic/Plenum<br />
Publishers. p 109-121.<br />
Fukui K, Shishido R, K<strong>in</strong>oshita T. 1997. Identification of the rice D-<br />
genome chromosomes by genomic <strong>in</strong> situ hybridization. Theor.<br />
Appl. Genet. 95:1239-1245.<br />
Fukui K, Ohmido N, Khush GS. 1994. Variability <strong>in</strong> rDNA loci <strong>in</strong><br />
genus Oryza detected through fluorescence <strong>in</strong> situ hybridization.<br />
Theor. Appl. Genet. 87:893-899.<br />
Nonomura KI, Kurata N. 1999. Organization of the 1.9-kb repeat<br />
unit RCE1 <strong>in</strong> the centromeric region of rice chromosomes.<br />
Mol. Gen. Genet. 26:1-10.<br />
Ohmido N, Kijima K, Ashikawa I, Hans de Jong J, Fukui K. 2001.<br />
Visualization of the term<strong>in</strong>al structure of rice chromosomes 6<br />
and 12 with multicolor FISH to chromosomes and extended<br />
DNA fibers. Plant Mol. Biol. 47:413-421.<br />
Shishido R, Sano Y, Fukui K. 1996. The third 45S rDNA locus <strong>in</strong> O.<br />
eich<strong>in</strong>geri CC newly detected by an improved FISH method.<br />
<strong>Rice</strong> Genet. Newsl. 13:84-85.<br />
Genetic diversity, evolution, and alien <strong>in</strong>trogression 105
S<strong>in</strong>gh K, Ishii T, Parco A, Huang N, Brar DS, Khush GS. 1996.<br />
Centromere mapp<strong>in</strong>g and orientation of the molecular l<strong>in</strong>kage<br />
map of rice (Oryza sativa L.). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA<br />
93:6163-6168.<br />
Uozu S, Ikehashi H, Ohmido N, Ohtsubo H, Ohtsubo E, Fukui K.<br />
1997. Repetitive sequences: cause for variation <strong>in</strong> genome<br />
size and chromosome morphology <strong>in</strong> the genus Oryza. Plant<br />
Mol. Biol. 35:791-799.<br />
Wang S, Wang J, Jiang J, Zhang Q. 2000. Mapp<strong>in</strong>g of centromeric<br />
regions on the molecular l<strong>in</strong>kage map of rice (Oryza sativa<br />
L.) us<strong>in</strong>g centromere-associated sequences. Mol. Gen. Genet.<br />
263:165-172.<br />
Notes<br />
Achievements <strong>in</strong> rice cytogenetics<br />
Hs<strong>in</strong>-Kan Wu and M<strong>in</strong>g-Hong Gu<br />
Author’s address: Department of Biotechnology, Graduate School<br />
of Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g, Osaka University, Suita 565-0871, Osaka,<br />
Japan.<br />
<strong>Rice</strong> chromosomes are so small that it was difficult to peruse any cytogenetic data before 1960. In 1978, Dr. Kurata of Kyushu<br />
University <strong>in</strong>vented a technique that revealed rice somatic prometaphase chromosomes with clear-cut centromere position and<br />
a total length vary<strong>in</strong>g from a few to more than 10 microns. This technique, <strong>in</strong> comb<strong>in</strong>ation with that for pachytene chromosomes<br />
explored <strong>in</strong> 1987, yielded many basic results: (1) the karyotypes of several cultivated and wild rice species showed<br />
specific differences, (2) several sets of rice translocations were identified and used to correspond the genetic l<strong>in</strong>kage groups<br />
to chromosomes identified <strong>in</strong> the karyotype and to map morphological marker genes, and (3) two series of rice primary<br />
trisomics have been exam<strong>in</strong>ed. The <strong>in</strong>vention of rice chromosome techniques can be regarded as the first milestone <strong>in</strong> rice<br />
cytogenetics and the second was the construction of a molecular l<strong>in</strong>kage map <strong>in</strong> 1988. The designation of the map was based<br />
on an approved agreement <strong>in</strong> 1990 at <strong>IRRI</strong>. The molecular maps have been expanded and a new saturated map, consist<strong>in</strong>g of<br />
2,300 DNA markers, has been released <strong>in</strong> Japan. These maps are the basis for mapp<strong>in</strong>g of genes, marker-assisted selection,<br />
comparative genomics, map-based gene isolation, and the like. Mapp<strong>in</strong>g of rice s<strong>in</strong>gle-copy markers or genes has lagged<br />
beh<strong>in</strong>d that of repetitive sequences. Fluorescent <strong>in</strong> situ hybridization (FISH) with nonisotope probes was found superior to that<br />
with isotope probes. Achiev<strong>in</strong>g reliable signals of a s<strong>in</strong>gle-copy gene below 10 kb has rema<strong>in</strong>ed difficult. However, bacterial<br />
artificial chromosome (BAC) clones conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g a target s<strong>in</strong>gle-copy gene produce good-quality signals on rice chromosomes.<br />
Thus, FISH with BACs can be used to locate s<strong>in</strong>gle-copy genes. Its future use <strong>in</strong> rice is promis<strong>in</strong>g, especially when detection<br />
schemes with high resolution are adopted. As the complete rice genome sequence becomes available, the use of functional<br />
genes would be substantially facilitated on the basis of cytogenetic knowledge accumulated <strong>in</strong> the past few decades—from the<br />
chromosome to the DNA level.<br />
<strong>Rice</strong> chromosomes are so small that it was difficult to peruse<br />
any conventional cytogenetic studies, except for count<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
number of chromosomes specific to a species. Shastry et al<br />
(1960) first suggested the use of rice chromosomes at the<br />
pachytene stage to number chromosomes <strong>in</strong> descend<strong>in</strong>g order.<br />
However, the order was found to be substantially different from<br />
that found <strong>in</strong> three other laboratories (Oka and Wu 1988). Seven<br />
years later, Wu (1967) explored the double mordant technique<br />
for rice pachytene chromosome preparations. When this technique<br />
was used <strong>in</strong> comb<strong>in</strong>ation with that <strong>in</strong>vented by Kurata<br />
and Omura (1978) for mitotic prometaphase chromosomes,<br />
many useful results were obta<strong>in</strong>ed.<br />
l The karyotypes of several cultivated and wild rice<br />
species were analyzed (Wu and Li l964, Kurata and<br />
Omura l978, Chen and Wu l982, Chung and Wu l987,<br />
Chung et al l993a). Variation was specific to the species.<br />
In general, the l2 pairs of cultivated rice can be<br />
well recognized. Chromosome 4 is unique <strong>in</strong> morphology,<br />
with a heterochromatic short arm and the<br />
biggest long arm to short arm ratio (L/S). Chromosomes<br />
8 and l0 are the nucleolar chromosomes (<strong>in</strong><br />
l<br />
l<br />
the case of <strong>in</strong>dica; there is only one <strong>in</strong> japonica, chromosome<br />
8) attached to the nucleolus with their short<br />
arm ends. Chromosome 10 is more metacentric. Undoubtedly,<br />
the def<strong>in</strong>ed karyotypes are the basis for<br />
identify<strong>in</strong>g rice translocations and trisomics and for<br />
physical mapp<strong>in</strong>g of rice genes.<br />
Several previously reported rice translocations<br />
(Nishimura l96l) were identified. These l<strong>in</strong>es have<br />
been used to relate rice genetic l<strong>in</strong>kage groups to chromosomes<br />
and to map rice genes (Iwata and Omura<br />
197la,b, Chung and Wu 1994, Sato et al 1973, 1975,<br />
Chen et al 1982).<br />
At least two series of rice primary trisomics, one <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>in</strong>dica and one <strong>in</strong> japonica, were produced. The identification<br />
of the extra chromosomes <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> the<br />
two trisomic series was respectively reported by<br />
Khush et al (1984) and Iwata and Omura (1984).<br />
However, because of differences <strong>in</strong> chromosome<br />
preparation technique, discrepancies occurred among<br />
the identification groups (Khush at al 1984, Kurata<br />
1988, Chung and Wu 1987, Wu and Chung 1988) of<br />
106 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
the <strong>in</strong>dica trisomic series isolated at <strong>IRRI</strong>. Later studies<br />
showed that such discrepancies could also be<br />
caused by the <strong>in</strong>stability found <strong>in</strong> some of the triplos<br />
(Chung and Wu 1997). After several meet<strong>in</strong>gs, an<br />
agreement on chromosome number<strong>in</strong>g was approved<br />
dur<strong>in</strong>g the 2nd <strong>International</strong> <strong>Rice</strong> <strong>Genetics</strong> Symposium<br />
<strong>in</strong> 1990. The third trisomic series was isolated<br />
by Cheng (1999), follow<strong>in</strong>g the 1990 number<strong>in</strong>g system.<br />
In addition, a previously unknown set of 24<br />
telotrisomics was also reported <strong>in</strong> his dissertation. The<br />
first rice molecular map was constructed (McCouch<br />
et al 1988) on the basis of the well-identified <strong>in</strong>dica<br />
trisomic series.<br />
Nagao and Takahashi (1963) attempted the first rice genetic<br />
map. However, a f<strong>in</strong>e correspondence between rice l<strong>in</strong>kage<br />
groups and their chromosomes was not figured out until<br />
chromosomes <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> the translocation and the trisomics<br />
were appropriately def<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> 1990. K<strong>in</strong>oshita completed the<br />
compilation of rice genes <strong>in</strong> the same year. This accumulated<br />
knowledge about 300 rice genes <strong>in</strong> a period of 50 years (1940-<br />
90) as reported <strong>in</strong> 224 papers. The rice l<strong>in</strong>kage map was reported<br />
to have about 160 genes located <strong>in</strong> 12 l<strong>in</strong>kage groups<br />
(K<strong>in</strong>oshita 1990).<br />
Mapp<strong>in</strong>g of genes at the rate of three genes per year could<br />
not meet rice breeders’ needs. A genetic map of 144 DNA<br />
molecular markers was constructed (McCouch et al 1988).<br />
Amaz<strong>in</strong>gly, mapp<strong>in</strong>g of molecular markers was 12-fold faster<br />
than conventional mapp<strong>in</strong>g us<strong>in</strong>g morphological markers. In<br />
1994, a map with 726 DNA molecular markers (with an average<br />
distance of 2 cM between two neighbor<strong>in</strong>g markers) was<br />
reported (Causse et al 1994). Kurata et al (1994) constructed a<br />
highly dense rice genetic map of 1,383 DNA. The distance<br />
between the markers was as little as 1.14 cM on average. The<br />
markers on the l<strong>in</strong>kage maps were used <strong>in</strong> marker-based clon<strong>in</strong>g<br />
and breed<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
A gene that confers resistance to bacterial blight (xa21)<br />
was found tightly l<strong>in</strong>ked to RG103 on chromosome 11 (Ronald<br />
et al 1992). Another gene, Pi5(t), resistant to rice blast race<br />
P06-6, was located on chromosome 4, flanked by markers<br />
RG498 and RG864 (Wang et al 1994). A new locus, S18, which<br />
affects high F 1 pollen sterility, was mapped between two DNA<br />
markers, G1084 and R1629. These markers are 5.3 cM apart<br />
on rice chromosome 10 (Doi et al 1998).<br />
Gustafson and Dille (1992) mapped several cDNA markers<br />
from the rice l<strong>in</strong>kage group and found that the mapped<br />
sites on the chromosome did not co<strong>in</strong>cide with those on the<br />
l<strong>in</strong>kage groups. This suggests that a l<strong>in</strong>kage (genetic) map<br />
should not be regarded as a chromosome (physical) map.<br />
Mapp<strong>in</strong>g of s<strong>in</strong>gle-copy genes on rice chromosomes beyond<br />
that of repetitive sequences is <strong>in</strong>frequent. Us<strong>in</strong>g radioisotopes,<br />
telomeric sequences have been mapped at either one<br />
or both ends of most rice prometaphase chromosomes (Chung<br />
et al l993b). Mapp<strong>in</strong>g of 45s rRNA genes with a<br />
nonradioisotope-labeled probe by FISH has been successful<br />
(Fukui et al 1994). In our laboratory at Yangzhou University,<br />
chromosome morphology can be so well reta<strong>in</strong>ed after a modified<br />
FISH with digoxigen<strong>in</strong> (DIG) label<strong>in</strong>g that the chromosome<br />
image can be directly read. The 45s rRNA gene signals<br />
are located at the ends of chromosomes 9 and l0. A successful<br />
mapp<strong>in</strong>g of bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) clones on<br />
rice chromosomes (Jiang et al 1995) opens a channel where<br />
rice s<strong>in</strong>gle-copy genes or sequences can be <strong>in</strong>directly mapped<br />
with confidence. First, a BAC library is screened by the ECL<br />
system us<strong>in</strong>g a s<strong>in</strong>gle-copy target gene probe and hybridized<br />
to the membrane. The positive BAC clone is used, <strong>in</strong> turn, as a<br />
probe hybridized to rice chromosomes by FISH. F<strong>in</strong>ally, the<br />
localized BAC clones are digitally mapped (Jackson et al<br />
1999).<br />
Recently, a new FISH method called fiber-FISH has become<br />
available. Jackson et al (1998) applied the extended DNA<br />
fiber technique to the physical mapp<strong>in</strong>g of Arabidopsis<br />
thaliana.<br />
Other than the strategies mentioned above, synaptonemal<br />
complex (SC) spreads (hypotonically spread pachytene<br />
chromosomes) can be used <strong>in</strong> the mapp<strong>in</strong>g of s<strong>in</strong>gle- and lowcopy<br />
sequences as Peterson et al (1999) demonstrated. A m<strong>in</strong>or<br />
modification of the double-mordant technique for rice<br />
pachytene chromosome preparation (Wu l967) would make it<br />
possible to map rice s<strong>in</strong>gle-copy genes on the SC with SC-<br />
FISH.<br />
<strong>Rice</strong> cytogenetics would contribute more to phase III of<br />
the rice genome project. In phase III, the function of rice genes<br />
will be identified (Wu 1999). Transgene expression may be<br />
stable or unstable. Cytogenetic analysis <strong>in</strong> tobacco by FISH<br />
showed that stably expressed transgenes were present <strong>in</strong> the<br />
vic<strong>in</strong>ity of telomeres. The unstably expressed transgenes occupied<br />
<strong>in</strong>tercalary and paracentromeric locations (Iglesias et<br />
al 1997). It seems that transgene expression may be affected<br />
by the site of <strong>in</strong>tegration on the chromosome (position effect)<br />
beyond the number of transgene constructions <strong>in</strong>tegrated and<br />
the structure of the plant DNA flank<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>in</strong>tegrated construction.<br />
References<br />
Causse MA, Fulton TM, Cho YG, Ahn SN, Chunwongse J, Wu K,<br />
Xiao J, Yu Z, Ronald PC, Harr<strong>in</strong>gton SE, Second G, McCouch<br />
SR, Tanksley SD. 1994. Saturated molecular map of the rice<br />
genome based on an <strong>in</strong>terspecific backcross population. <strong>Genetics</strong><br />
138:1251-1274.<br />
Chen JT, Lai HC, Huang IH, Chung MC, Wu HK. 1982. Identification<br />
of rice translocation and the location of lazy (la) gene.<br />
Bot. Bull. Acad. S<strong>in</strong>. 23:71-87. (Ch<strong>in</strong>ese/English.)<br />
Chen YJ, Wu HK. l982. A comparison of karyotypes among six Oryza<br />
species. Bot. Bull. Acad. S<strong>in</strong>. 23:l63-l83.<br />
Cheng ZK. 1999. <strong>Rice</strong> aneuploids: orig<strong>in</strong>, identification and application<br />
<strong>in</strong> rice genomic research. Dissertation. Agric Yangzhou<br />
University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, Ch<strong>in</strong>a.<br />
Chung MC, Wu HK. 1987. Karyotype analysis of IR36 and two trisomic<br />
l<strong>in</strong>es of rice. Bot. Bull. Acad. S<strong>in</strong>. 28:289-304.<br />
Chung MC, Wu HK. 1997. Chromosome <strong>in</strong>stability <strong>in</strong>duced by fragments<br />
<strong>in</strong> trisomic rice (Oryza sativa L.). Cytologia 62:67-79.<br />
Genetic diversity, evolution, and alien <strong>in</strong>trogression 107
Chung MC, Wu HK. 1994. Cytological identification of the chromosomes<br />
<strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> Nishimura’s reciprocal translocation<br />
l<strong>in</strong>es. Theor. Appl. Genet. 88:956-964.<br />
Chung MC, N<strong>in</strong>g CN, Wu HK. l993. Localization of ribosomal RNA<br />
genes on rice chromosomes. Bot. Bull. Acad. S<strong>in</strong>. 34:43-55.<br />
Chung MC, N<strong>in</strong>g CN, Wu T, Wu R, Wu HK. 1993. Localization of<br />
a repetitive sequence, (CCCTAAA) 11 , at the ends of rice chromosomes.<br />
<strong>Rice</strong> Genet. Newsl. 10:123-125.<br />
Doi K, Taguchi K, Yoshimura A. 1998. A new locus affect<strong>in</strong>g high<br />
F 1 pollen sterility found <strong>in</strong> backcrosss progenies of japonica<br />
rice and African rice. <strong>Rice</strong> Genet. Newsl. 15:146-148.<br />
Fukui K, Ohmido N, Khush GS. 1994. Variability <strong>in</strong> rDNA loci <strong>in</strong><br />
the genus Oryza detected through fluorescence <strong>in</strong> situ hybridization.<br />
Theor. Appl. Genet. 87:893-899.<br />
Gustafson P, Dille JE. 1992. Chromosome location of Oryza sativa<br />
recomb<strong>in</strong>ation l<strong>in</strong>kage groups. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA<br />
89:8646-8650.<br />
Iglesias VA, Moscone EA, Papp I, Michalowski S, Phelan T, Spiker<br />
S, Neuhuber F, Matzke M, Matzke AJM. 1997. Molecular<br />
and cytogenetic analysis of stably and unstably expressed<br />
transgene loci <strong>in</strong> tobacco. Plant Cell 9:1251-1264.<br />
Iwata N, Omura T. 1971a. L<strong>in</strong>kage analysis by reciprocal translocation<br />
method <strong>in</strong> rice plants (Oryza sativa L.). I. L<strong>in</strong>kage groups<br />
correspond<strong>in</strong>g to the chromosome 1, 2, 3, 4. Jpn. J. Breed.<br />
21:19-28. (In Japanese/English.)<br />
Iwata N, Omura T. 1971b. L<strong>in</strong>kage analysis by reciprocal translocation<br />
method <strong>in</strong> rice plants (Oryza sativa L.). II. L<strong>in</strong>kage groups<br />
correspond<strong>in</strong>g to the chromosome 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, and 11.<br />
Sci. Bull. Fac. Agric. Kyushu Univ. 25:137-153. (In Japanese/English.)<br />
Iwata N, Omura T. 1984. Studies on the trisomics <strong>in</strong> rice plants. V.<br />
Relationship between the twelve chromosomes and the l<strong>in</strong>kage<br />
groups. Jpn. J. Breed. 34:314-321.<br />
Jackson SA, Dong F, Jiang J. l999. Digital mapp<strong>in</strong>g of bacterial artificial<br />
chromosome by fluorescence <strong>in</strong> situ hybridization. Plant<br />
J. l7:58l-587.<br />
Jackson SA, Wang MI, Goodman HM, Jiang J. l998. Application of<br />
fiber FISH <strong>in</strong> physical mapp<strong>in</strong>g of Arabidopsis thaliana. Genome<br />
4l:566-572.<br />
Jiang J, Gill BS, Wang GL, Ronald PC, Ward DC. l995. Metaphase<br />
and <strong>in</strong>terphase fluorescence <strong>in</strong> situ hybridization mapp<strong>in</strong>g of<br />
the rice genome with bacterial artificial chromosomes. Proc.<br />
Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92:4487-449l.<br />
Khush GS, S<strong>in</strong>gh RJ, Sur SC, Librojo AL. 1984. Primary trisomics<br />
of rice: orig<strong>in</strong>, morphology, cytology and use <strong>in</strong> l<strong>in</strong>kage mapp<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
<strong>Genetics</strong> 107:141-163.<br />
K<strong>in</strong>oshita T. 1990. Report of the committee on gene symbolization,<br />
nomenclature and l<strong>in</strong>kage groups. <strong>Rice</strong> Genet. Newsl. 7:16-<br />
50.<br />
Kurata N. 1988. Identification of trivalent chromosomes of IR36<br />
Triplo plants. <strong>Rice</strong> Genet. Newsl. 5:54-59.<br />
Kurata N, Omura T. 1978. Karyotype analysis <strong>in</strong> rice. I. A new method<br />
for identify<strong>in</strong>g all chromosome pairs. Jpn. J. Genet. 53:251-<br />
255.<br />
Kurata N, Nagamura Y, Yamamoto K, Harushima Y, Sue N, Wu J,<br />
Antonio BA, Shomura A, Shimizu T, L<strong>in</strong> SY, Inoue T, Fukuda<br />
A, Shimano T, Kuboki Y, Toyama T, Miyamoto Y, Kirihara T,<br />
Hayasaka K, Miyao A, Monna L, Zhong HS, Tamura Y, Wang<br />
ZX, Momma T, Umehara Y, Yano M, Sasaki T, M<strong>in</strong>obe Y.<br />
1994. A 300 kilobase <strong>in</strong>terval genetic map of rice <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g<br />
883 expressed sequences. Nat. Genet. 8:365-372.<br />
McCouch SR, Kochert G, Yu ZH, Wang ZY, Khush GS, Coffman<br />
WR, Tanksley SD. 1988. Molecular mapp<strong>in</strong>g of rice chromosomes.<br />
Theor. Appl. Genet. 76:815-829.<br />
Nagao S, Takahashi M. 1963. Genetical studies on rice plant. XXVII.<br />
Trial construction of twelve l<strong>in</strong>kage groups <strong>in</strong> Japanese rice.<br />
Fac. Agric. Hokkaido Univ. 53:72-130.<br />
Nishimura Y. 1961. Studies on the reciprocal translocations <strong>in</strong> rice<br />
and barley. Bull. Natl. Inst. Agric. Sci. Jpn. Ser. D 9:171-235.<br />
(In Japanese/English.)<br />
Oka HI, Wu HK. 1988. Comparison of data on rice chromosomes<br />
presented by different authors. <strong>Rice</strong> Genet. Newsl. 5:34-4l.<br />
Peterson DG, Lapitan NLV, Stack SM. l999. Localization of s<strong>in</strong>gleand<br />
low-copy sequences on tomato synatonemal complex<br />
spreads us<strong>in</strong>g fluorescence <strong>in</strong> situ hybridization. <strong>Genetics</strong><br />
l52:427-439.<br />
Ronald PC, Albano B, Tabien R, Abenes L, Wu KS, McCouch SR,<br />
Tanksley SD. 1992. Genetic and physical analysis of the rice<br />
bacterial blight disease resistance locus, Xa21. Mol. Gen.<br />
Genet. 236:113-120.<br />
Sato S, K<strong>in</strong>oshita T, Takahashi M. 1973. Genetical studies on rice<br />
plant. LIV. L<strong>in</strong>kage analysis of rice plant by the use of<br />
Nishimura’s reciprocal translocation l<strong>in</strong>es. Mem. Fac. Agric.<br />
Hokkaido Univ. 8:367-376. (In Japanese/English.)<br />
Sato S, K<strong>in</strong>oshita T, Takahashi M. 1975. Genetical studies on rice<br />
plant. LXII. L<strong>in</strong>kage analysis of rice plant by the use of<br />
Nishimura’s reciprocal translocation l<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong>duced from l<strong>in</strong>kage<br />
testers. Mem. Fac. Agric. Hokkaido Univ. 9:193-199.<br />
Shastry SVS, Rangarao DR, Misra RM. 1960. Pachytene analysis <strong>in</strong><br />
Oryza. I. Chromosome morphology <strong>in</strong> Oryza sativa. Indian J.<br />
Genet. Plant Breed. 20:l5-21.<br />
Wang GL, Mackill DJ, Bonman JM, McCouch SR, Champoux MC,<br />
Nelson RJ. 1994. RFLP mapp<strong>in</strong>g of genes conferr<strong>in</strong>g complete<br />
and partial resistance to blast <strong>in</strong> a durably resistant rice<br />
cultivar. <strong>Genetics</strong> 136:1421-1434.<br />
Wu HK, Li SY. 1964. Chromosome morphology of Oryza sativa<br />
and Oryza australiensis and their pair<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the F 1 hybrid at<br />
earlier meiosis. Bot. Bull. Acad. S<strong>in</strong>. 5:162-169.<br />
Wu HK. 1967. Note on preparation of pachytene chromosomes by<br />
double mordant. Sci. Agric. l5:40-44. (Ch<strong>in</strong>ese/English summary.)<br />
Wu R. 1999. Report of the committee on genetic eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g<br />
(Funtional genomics of plants). <strong>Rice</strong> Genet. Newsl. 16:10-<br />
14.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ address: Laboratory of <strong>Rice</strong> <strong>Genetics</strong> and Breed<strong>in</strong>g, Agricultural<br />
College, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu<br />
225009, Ch<strong>in</strong>a.<br />
108 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
Advanced cytogenetics <strong>in</strong> Oryzeae<br />
S.A. Jackson, Z. Cheng, J. Jiang, and R.L. Phillips<br />
Cytogenetic research <strong>in</strong> rice has lagged considerably beh<strong>in</strong>d that <strong>in</strong> other cereal species, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g maize and wheat. However,<br />
the advent of new molecular techniques has facilitated work <strong>in</strong> rice cytology. <strong>Rice</strong> pachytene chromosomes are ideal for<br />
fluorescence <strong>in</strong> situ hybridization (FISH) mapp<strong>in</strong>g. The rice genome conta<strong>in</strong>s less repetitive DNA than that of many other cereal<br />
species. Even though there are repetitive DNA sequences <strong>in</strong> most rice bacterial artificial chromosomes (BACs), it is possible to<br />
map these BAC clones on rice chromosomes and DNA fibers by preanneal<strong>in</strong>g the probes to rice Cot-1 DNA. Thus, rice genomic<br />
DNA clones are suitable for fiber-FISH mapp<strong>in</strong>g and FISH on extended DNA fibers. We found that DNA clones separated by<br />
about 100 kb of DNA can be resolved on rice pachytene chromosomes. This is a much higher resolution than metaphase<br />
chromosomes, where adjacent BACs would have to be separated by several megabases to resolve their order. We recently<br />
developed a set of BACs that can be used to mark all 24 rice chromosome arms. This is a valuable tool for future cytogenetic<br />
mapp<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> rice. Us<strong>in</strong>g fiber-FISH, several rice BACs have been mapped to determ<strong>in</strong>e the size of the gaps <strong>in</strong> BAC contigs that<br />
are set to be sequenced. Several rice BACs have also been mapped <strong>in</strong> related species with<strong>in</strong> the Oryzeae to determ<strong>in</strong>e the<br />
physical conservation of genomic architecture. Based on the fiber-FISH mapp<strong>in</strong>g of rice BACs <strong>in</strong> American wild rice (Zizania<br />
palustris), it appeared that over this evolutionary distance there has been an accumulation of <strong>in</strong>tergenic DNA that is not<br />
conserved between these two species. Although the comparative genetic map of wild rice and rice is more than 80% col<strong>in</strong>ear,<br />
the physical conservation of rice BACs <strong>in</strong> wild rice appears to be <strong>in</strong>terrupted by DNA sequences that are not shared between<br />
these two species.<br />
Much has been accomplished <strong>in</strong> rice cytogenetics despite the<br />
dim<strong>in</strong>utive chromosomes of rice. Classical studies describe the<br />
various genomes of the Oryza species by analyz<strong>in</strong>g pair<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><br />
hybrids. S<strong>in</strong>gh et al (1996) used secondary trisomics and<br />
telotrisomics to physically map genes and def<strong>in</strong>e the position<br />
of rice centromeres. Because of the size of rice chromosomes,<br />
other classical cytogenetic techniques, such as band<strong>in</strong>g, were<br />
unsuitable for chromosome analysis. However, the advent of<br />
molecular cytogenetic techniques has paved the way for a new<br />
era <strong>in</strong> rice chromosome research.<br />
New molecular techniques have been applied to describe<br />
the repetitive portion of the rice genome by mapp<strong>in</strong>g rDNA<br />
loci on chromosomes and rDNA and other repetitive sequences<br />
on extended DNA fibers (Dong et al 1998, Ohmido et al 2000).<br />
Classical cytogenetic stocks have been comb<strong>in</strong>ed with molecular<br />
genetics to map sequences to particular chromosomal regions<br />
(S<strong>in</strong>gh et al 1996). Additionally, rice centromeres are<br />
be<strong>in</strong>g dissected by molecular biological and molecular cytogenetic<br />
techniques (Dong et al 1998, Wang et al 2000). This is<br />
an excit<strong>in</strong>g time for rice chromosome research s<strong>in</strong>ce many<br />
genomic resources are available (i.e., YAC—yeast artificial<br />
chromosome—and BAC—bacterial artificial chromosome—<br />
libraries, mutant stocks, rice genome sequenc<strong>in</strong>g) and tools<br />
for chromosome research cont<strong>in</strong>ue to be developed.<br />
<strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> molecular cytogenetics<br />
Molecular cytogenetics began with the development of radioactive<br />
<strong>in</strong> situ hybridization technology followed by enzymatic<br />
detection and f<strong>in</strong>ally by fluorescence technology (FISH). FISH<br />
has become a powerful technique s<strong>in</strong>ce it can be used on various<br />
cytological targets and multiple sequences can be mapped<br />
simultaneously us<strong>in</strong>g different fluors. Different cytological<br />
targets offer differ<strong>in</strong>g advantages or disadvantages (Table 1).<br />
Premetaphase I chromosomes at the pachytene stage are<br />
excellent FISH targets. These chromosomes are more extended<br />
than mitotic metaphase chromosomes and offer more resolution<br />
to spatially separate adjacent DNA sequences. We have<br />
been able to resolve adjacent BAC clones separated by as little<br />
as 100 kb. Fiber-FISH is an extension of the basic FISH technique<br />
us<strong>in</strong>g extended DNA fibers, prepared from <strong>in</strong>terphase<br />
nuclei, as the target for probe hybridization.<br />
Table 1. Comparison of fluorescence <strong>in</strong> situ hybridization on various cytological targets.<br />
Cytological target Resolution M<strong>in</strong>imum Advantages Disadvantages<br />
probe size<br />
Metaphase chromosome 1–2 Mb >20 kb Map to chromosome/arms Low resolution<br />
Interphase nuclei 50 kb–1 Mb >20 kb Good resolution Less chromosomal<br />
<strong>in</strong>formation<br />
Pachytene chromosome 100 kb >10 kb Moderate resolution and map Chromosome morphology<br />
to chromosome/arms<br />
is distorted<br />
DNA fibers Approx. 10–500 kb >1 kb High resolution Less chromosomal <strong>in</strong>formation<br />
Genetic diversity, evolution, and alien <strong>in</strong>trogression 109
A<br />
C<br />
D<br />
B<br />
E<br />
Fig. 1. (A) BAC 96I15, identified<br />
by screen<strong>in</strong>g rice BAC library<br />
with RFLP probe R3166,<br />
hybridizes to the short arm of<br />
chromosome 5 on pachytene<br />
chromosomes (arrow). (B) 5S<br />
ribosomal DNA hybridized to<br />
DNA fibers. The entire locus<br />
is 299.8 kb <strong>in</strong> size. (C and D)<br />
<strong>Rice</strong> BACs 32A12 (red) and<br />
06F05 (green) (identified with<br />
RFLP probes S10620 and<br />
S14152, respectively) hybridized<br />
to an <strong>in</strong>terphase nucleus<br />
(C, arrows) where the signals<br />
overlap and to extended DNA<br />
fibers (D) where the two BACs<br />
are separated by a distance<br />
of approximately 195 kb. (E)<br />
RCS2, a high-copy tandemly<br />
repeated centromeric sequence<br />
hybridized to all 12<br />
centromeres on pachytene<br />
chromosomes. In B and D, the<br />
bars are equivalent to 20 µm.<br />
<strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice chromosome research<br />
FISH has been a useful tool <strong>in</strong> rice research for many years<br />
us<strong>in</strong>g metaphase chromosomes. Ribosomal DNA loci and other<br />
repetitive sequences have been mapped to specific chromosomes<br />
us<strong>in</strong>g FISH. However, only recently have <strong>in</strong>terphase<br />
nuclei, DNA fibers, and pachytene chromosomes become cytological<br />
targets for FISH analyses.<br />
Interphase nuclei and pachytene chromosomes<br />
Interphase nuclei offer a much higher resolv<strong>in</strong>g power than<br />
metaphase chromosomes but they must be comb<strong>in</strong>ed with<br />
analyses on metaphase/pachytene chromosomes to locate a<br />
sequence to a specific chromosome. The distance <strong>in</strong> micrometers<br />
between two DNA probes <strong>in</strong> an <strong>in</strong>terphase nucleus is l<strong>in</strong>early<br />
related to the physical distance <strong>in</strong> kilobases, over a range<br />
of 100 kb to 1 Mb. FISH us<strong>in</strong>g rice <strong>in</strong>terphase nuclei was comb<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
with FISH us<strong>in</strong>g prometaphase chromosomes <strong>in</strong> rice to<br />
physically def<strong>in</strong>e the Xa21 regions us<strong>in</strong>g l<strong>in</strong>ked BACs (Jiang<br />
et al 1995).<br />
Pachytene chromosomes have long been used to identify<br />
chromosomes <strong>in</strong> rice because of the ability to more easily<br />
dist<strong>in</strong>guish size, determ<strong>in</strong>e arm ratios, locate a nucleolar-organiz<strong>in</strong>g<br />
region, and evaluate heterochromat<strong>in</strong>. However, only<br />
recently have pachytene chromosomes become rout<strong>in</strong>e targets<br />
for FISH. Z. Cheng and J. Jiang are currently us<strong>in</strong>g pachytene<br />
chromosomes to evaluate/confirm genetic maps and help the<br />
genome community assemble BAC contigs. Us<strong>in</strong>g Cot-1 DNA,<br />
they are able to rout<strong>in</strong>ely map RFLP-selected BACs to specific<br />
chromosome arms (Fig. 1A). They are also able to dist<strong>in</strong>guish<br />
the order of BACs separated by only 100 kb.<br />
Recently, a set of BACs was developed to cytologically<br />
mark all 24 chromosome arms. This is a valuable tool to be<br />
able to follow <strong>in</strong>dividual chromosome arms <strong>in</strong> breed<strong>in</strong>g applications,<br />
aid <strong>in</strong> develop<strong>in</strong>g aneuploid stocks, and use <strong>in</strong> basic<br />
research.<br />
Fish on extended DNA fibers (fiber-FISH)<br />
DNA fibers have been used to determ<strong>in</strong>e the size/copy number<br />
of the 5S rDNA loci <strong>in</strong> rice (Ohmido et al 2000, Fig. 1B).<br />
We have also used fiber-FISH to determ<strong>in</strong>e the physical distance<br />
between two BACs selected with RFLP markers from<br />
the genetic map of rice (Fig. 1C, D). BACs T06F05 and<br />
T32A12 were selected with RFLP markers S10620 and<br />
S14152, respectively, from chromosome 10. These two RFLP<br />
probes map to the same locus (www.dna.affrc.go.jp/cgi-b<strong>in</strong>/<br />
accsearch.plD48104), but the physical distance, determ<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
by measur<strong>in</strong>g the distance <strong>in</strong> mm between the two BACs on<br />
DNA fibers and convert<strong>in</strong>g to kb, was approximately 195 kb.<br />
This has been confirmed <strong>in</strong> assembl<strong>in</strong>g the physical map for<br />
sequenc<strong>in</strong>g at the Clemson University Genomics Institute<br />
(CUGI).<br />
110 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
Chromosome structure<br />
The DNA structure of rice centromeres has recently begun to<br />
be dissected. A rice centromeric BAC was isolated by screen<strong>in</strong>g<br />
a rice BAC library with a cereal centromere-specific probe<br />
(Dong et al 1998). The DNA structure of rice centromeres<br />
appears to consist of a highly repetitive tandem 168-bp sequence<br />
(RCS2, Fig. 1E). Structurally similar sequences (tandem<br />
repeats of 160–180 bp) have been found <strong>in</strong> other cereal<br />
centromeres but these do not share any sequence identity. Lower<br />
copy repetitive centromeric sequences have been found <strong>in</strong> rice<br />
and other cereals that can be species-/genera-specific or shared<br />
across genera (Jiang et al 1996 Dong et al 1998).<br />
Comparative physical mapp<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Recently, we have focused on comparative physical mapp<strong>in</strong>g<br />
us<strong>in</strong>g rice BACs as the basic resource. Arabidopsis BACs have<br />
successfully been mapped on chromosomes and DNA fibers<br />
from Brassica rapa (Jackson et al 2000). We have begun to<br />
use this approach <strong>in</strong> the tribe Oryzeae us<strong>in</strong>g rice BACs to physically<br />
def<strong>in</strong>e homologous/paralogous regions <strong>in</strong> related species.<br />
Based on comparative genetic mapp<strong>in</strong>g, Zizania palustris<br />
(American wild rice) has a genetic map that is >80% col<strong>in</strong>ear<br />
to the rice genetic map; however, it appears that there has been<br />
an accumulation of <strong>in</strong>tergenic sequences such that it is difficult<br />
to physically def<strong>in</strong>e homologous regions by hybridiz<strong>in</strong>g<br />
rice BACs to DNA fibers of Z. palustris. However, we are<br />
beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g to use this approach <strong>in</strong> more closely related wild<br />
Oryza species with better success. By us<strong>in</strong>g BACs from several<br />
chromosomal regions of rice, we hope to know precisely<br />
how Oryzeae chromosomes/genomes evolved.<br />
References<br />
Dong F, Miller JT, Jackson SA, Wang G-L, Ronald PC, Jiang J.<br />
1998. <strong>Rice</strong> (Oryza sativa) centromeric regions consist of complex<br />
DNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95:8135-8140.<br />
Jackson SA, Cheng Z, Wang ML, Goodman HM, Jiang J. 2000.<br />
Comparative FISH mapp<strong>in</strong>g of a 431-kb Arabidopsis thaliana<br />
BAC contig reveals the role of chromosomal duplications <strong>in</strong><br />
the expansion of the Brassica rapa genome. <strong>Genetics</strong> 156:833-<br />
838.<br />
Jiang J, Gill BS, Wang GL, Ronald PC, Ward DC. 1995. Metaphase<br />
and <strong>in</strong>terphase fluorescence <strong>in</strong> situ hybridization mapp<strong>in</strong>g of<br />
the rice genome with bacterial artificial chromosomes. Proc.<br />
Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92:4487-4491.<br />
Jiang J, Nasuda S, Dong F, Scherrer CW, Woo S-S, W<strong>in</strong>g RA, Gill<br />
BS, Ward DC. 1996. A conserved repetitive DNA element<br />
located <strong>in</strong> the centromeres of cereal chromosomes. Proc. Natl.<br />
Acad. Sci. USA 93:14210-14213.<br />
Ohmido N, Kijima K, Akiyama Y, de Jong JH, Fukui K. 2000. Quantification<br />
of total genomic DNA and selected repetitive sequences<br />
reveals concurrent changes <strong>in</strong> different DNA families<br />
<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>dica and japonica rice. Mol. Gen. Genet. 263:388-<br />
394.<br />
S<strong>in</strong>gh K, Ishii T, Parco A, Huang N, Brar DS, Khush G. 1996. Centromere<br />
mapp<strong>in</strong>g and orientation of the molecular l<strong>in</strong>kage map<br />
of rice (Oryza sativa L.). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93:6163-<br />
6168.<br />
Wang S, Wang J, Jiang J, Zhang Q. 2000. Mapp<strong>in</strong>g of centromeric<br />
regions on the molecular l<strong>in</strong>kage map of rice (Oryza sativa<br />
L.) us<strong>in</strong>g centromere-associated sequences. Mol. Gen. Genet.<br />
263:165-172.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ addresses: S.A. Jackson, R.L. Phillips, Department of<br />
Agronomy and Plant <strong>Genetics</strong>, University of M<strong>in</strong>nesota, 411<br />
Borlaug Hall, 1991 Upper Buford Circle, St. Paul, MN 55108;<br />
Z. Cheng and J. Jiang, Department of Horticulture, University<br />
of Wiscons<strong>in</strong>-Madison, 1575 L<strong>in</strong>den Drive, Madison, WI<br />
53706, USA.<br />
Cell-cycle synchronization and flow karyotyp<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> rice<br />
J.H. Lee, Y.S. Chung, D.H. Kim, K.Y. Kim, J.W. Kim, O.C. Kwon, and J.S. Sh<strong>in</strong><br />
Highly efficient cell synchronization and metaphase chromosome accumulation <strong>in</strong> rice root-tip cells were achieved. Flow<br />
cytometric analysis was performed for obta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g optimal parameters to synchronize the cell cycles. High mitotic <strong>in</strong>dices (57.6%<br />
<strong>in</strong> root meristematic region) were obta<strong>in</strong>ed by treat<strong>in</strong>g 0.5-cm seedl<strong>in</strong>gs with 0.5 mM hydroxyurea at 30 o C for 4 h, <strong>in</strong>cubat<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>in</strong> a hydroxyurea-free solution for 30 m<strong>in</strong>, and then treat<strong>in</strong>g with 0.3 µM triflural<strong>in</strong> for 3 h. After triflural<strong>in</strong> treatment, <strong>in</strong>cubation<br />
<strong>in</strong> distilled water for 15 m<strong>in</strong> reduced chromosome clump<strong>in</strong>g on metaphase spread. Uniformity <strong>in</strong> seed germ<strong>in</strong>ation at the time<br />
of treatment is a critical parameter for obta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g a high metaphase <strong>in</strong>dex. Isolated rice chromosomes were suitable for flow<br />
cytometric analysis and chromosome sort<strong>in</strong>g. The morphology of flow-sorted metaphase chromosomes was not affected.<br />
<strong>Rice</strong> has become a model plant for molecular genetic research.<br />
It has 12 chromosomes, a small genome size (2C = 0.90 pg)<br />
(Arumuganathan and Earle 1991), and a large proportion of<br />
low-copy-number or unique DNA sequences compared with<br />
other cereals. Cytogenetic research <strong>in</strong> rice, however, has been<br />
limited because of the small size and similarity of metaphase<br />
chromosomes, no reproducible chromosome band<strong>in</strong>g pattern,<br />
and the difficulty <strong>in</strong> qualify<strong>in</strong>g and quantify<strong>in</strong>g cytological<br />
preparations (Fukui and Iijima 1991). Accumulation of many<br />
metaphase chromosomes from root tips is an important step <strong>in</strong><br />
Genetic diversity, evolution, and alien <strong>in</strong>trogression 111
somatic chromosome studies. Limited <strong>in</strong>formation is available<br />
on cell-cycle synchronization from root tips <strong>in</strong> rice. Studies on<br />
cell-cycle synchronization and chromosome preparation from<br />
cereal root tips have been carried out (Pan et al 1993, Lee et al<br />
1996, 1997a). The optimal parameters used to obta<strong>in</strong> many<br />
metaphase cells are different for each species.<br />
In this study, we present the conditions and parameters<br />
for effective cell synchronization and accumulation of<br />
metaphase chromosomes <strong>in</strong> rice root tips. We also describe<br />
the flow of cytometric analysis and sort<strong>in</strong>g of rice metaphase<br />
chromosomes.<br />
Materials and methods<br />
Cell-cycle synchronization and metaphase accumulation<br />
<strong>Rice</strong> seeds were obta<strong>in</strong>ed from Dr. Carl Johnson, University<br />
of California-Davis (japonica, M202), and from Dr. Anna<br />
McClung, Beaumont Breed<strong>in</strong>g Station, Texas, USA (<strong>in</strong>dica,<br />
IR36). The cell cycle was systematically tested us<strong>in</strong>g flow<br />
cytometry as described by Lee et al (1996). Seeds were sterilized<br />
with 5% bleach solution for 30 m<strong>in</strong>, and then <strong>in</strong>cubated<br />
on wet paper towels at room temperature for 2 d. Seedl<strong>in</strong>gs<br />
with about 0.5-cm-long roots were treated with four different<br />
concentrations (0.1, 0.5, 1.0, and 1.5 mM) of hydroxyurea<br />
(DNA synthesis <strong>in</strong>hibitor) <strong>in</strong> 10 mL Hoagland solution at 30<br />
o<br />
C. The term<strong>in</strong>al 1.0-mm tips of five roots were excised and<br />
analyzed at 1-h <strong>in</strong>tervals from 0 to 24 h for each hydroxyurea<br />
treatment. The percentage of nuclei <strong>in</strong> G1, S, and G2/M phases<br />
<strong>in</strong> the root-tip cells was determ<strong>in</strong>ed us<strong>in</strong>g flow cytometry.<br />
Treatment parameters of triflural<strong>in</strong> (metaphase block<strong>in</strong>g<br />
reagent) were <strong>in</strong>vestigated for accumulat<strong>in</strong>g large numbers<br />
of root-tip cells <strong>in</strong> metaphase. Seedl<strong>in</strong>gs of 0.5-cm length<br />
were treated with 0.5 mM hydroxyurea <strong>in</strong> 10 mL Hoagland<br />
solution at 30 o C for 4 h, r<strong>in</strong>sed <strong>in</strong> sterile distilled water, and<br />
<strong>in</strong>cubated at 30 o C for 30 m<strong>in</strong> (until root-tip cells reached late<br />
S or early G2 phase). They were then transferred to petri dishes<br />
conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g Whatman filter papers soaked <strong>in</strong> triflural<strong>in</strong> with 0.2,<br />
0.3, 0.4, and 0.5 µM <strong>in</strong> 10 mL Hoagland solution. The term<strong>in</strong>al<br />
1.0-mm root tips were analyzed at 1-h <strong>in</strong>tervals, and optimal<br />
concentration and time of triflural<strong>in</strong> treatment were determ<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
based on metaphase <strong>in</strong>dex and flow karyotyp<strong>in</strong>g. The<br />
mitotic <strong>in</strong>dex was determ<strong>in</strong>ed by scor<strong>in</strong>g at least 100 cells per<br />
root tip (0.5 mm from root cap). The mean mitotic <strong>in</strong>dex was<br />
calculated from 20 observations.<br />
Preparation of metaphase spreads<br />
Metaphase spreads were prepared by enzymatic maceration.<br />
Root tips were treated with an enzyme mixture (5% cellulase<br />
Onozuka R-10 and 1% pectolyase Y-23 <strong>in</strong> 0.01 M citric acid/<br />
sodium citrate buffer, pH 4.5) <strong>in</strong> a 1.5-mL microfuge tube at<br />
room temperature for 30 m<strong>in</strong>, washed with distilled water, and<br />
tapped with f<strong>in</strong>e forceps until well spread on a slide. The<br />
squashed root tips were sta<strong>in</strong>ed with drops of 5% modified<br />
carbolfuchs<strong>in</strong> solution (Kao 1982) for 10 m<strong>in</strong>. The slide was<br />
heated slightly, after which one drop of distilled water was<br />
added, and then covered with a coverslip. The preparations<br />
were observed under a microscope for count<strong>in</strong>g the mitotic<br />
<strong>in</strong>dex. Metaphase cells were photographed under three different<br />
conditions—normal exposure, overexposure, and underexposure—us<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Kodak Tri-X pan 400 black-and-white film.<br />
Flow cytometric analysis<br />
Chromosomes were isolated from the term<strong>in</strong>al 1.0-mm root<br />
tip by chopp<strong>in</strong>g with a sharp sterile scalpel blade <strong>in</strong> 0.5 mL<br />
slightly modified LB01 buffer (15 mM Tris, 2 mM Na 2 EDTA,<br />
80 mM KCl, 20 mM NaCl, 0.5 mM sperm<strong>in</strong>e, 3 mM<br />
dithiothreitol, 20 µg mL –1 propidium iodide [PI], 0.25% Triton<br />
X-100, pH 7.5). The chromosome suspension was filtered<br />
through a 30-µm nylon mesh, <strong>in</strong>cubated on ice for 30 m<strong>in</strong>, and<br />
analyzed on a FACScan flow cytometer (Becton Dick<strong>in</strong>son,<br />
San Jose, CA, USA). The excitation source was an argon ion<br />
laser emitt<strong>in</strong>g a 488-nm beam at 15 mW for excitation of PI.<br />
Red PI fluorescence was collected with a standard 585/42-nm<br />
band pass filter <strong>in</strong> the FL2 channel and with a 650-nm-long<br />
pass filter <strong>in</strong> the FL3 channel. Forward light scatter values on<br />
a l<strong>in</strong>ear scale of 1,024 channels and PI-fluorescence <strong>in</strong>tensities<br />
(FL3-peak height) on a logarithmic scale of fluorescence<br />
of four decades of log were measured for all particles <strong>in</strong> the<br />
chromosome suspensions. PI-fluorescence pulse area (FL2-A)<br />
was measured on a l<strong>in</strong>ear scale of 1,024 channels for wheat<br />
chromosomes <strong>in</strong> the preparations. Data were collected and<br />
analyzed with the CellQuest software (Becton Dick<strong>in</strong>son, San<br />
Jose, CA, USA).<br />
Chromosome sort<strong>in</strong>g was conducted on a FACS Vantage<br />
cell sorter system (Becton Dick<strong>in</strong>son, San Jose, CA, USA).<br />
An autoclaved chromosome isolation buffer without<br />
dithiothreitol was used as sheath fluid. Sort<strong>in</strong>g gates were set<br />
on each of the prom<strong>in</strong>ent peaks of univariate flow karyotype,<br />
<strong>in</strong> turn, to identify the objects correspond<strong>in</strong>g to them. Objects<br />
from the selected peak area were collected directly onto a piece<br />
of black nitrocellulose membrane (Millipore Type AA, pore<br />
size 0.8 µm) placed on a microscope slide. Chromosomes from<br />
each peak were also collected <strong>in</strong>to microfuge tubes by flow<br />
sort<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
To confirm the content of sorted fractions, 20 µL of chromosome<br />
isolation buffer was added to the sorted fraction on<br />
the black membrane, covered with a coverslip, and observed<br />
under an Olympus BM60 fluorescence research microscope.<br />
Photographs were taken with an Olympus PM30 camera system<br />
us<strong>in</strong>g Kodak Ektachrome 400 ASA color film and Kodak<br />
Tri-X pan 400 black-and-white film.<br />
A theoretical monoparametric flow karyotype was constructed<br />
accord<strong>in</strong>g to Conia et al (1989). The published relative<br />
chromosome size (Fukui and Iijima 1991) was used for<br />
this purpose. Channel numbers and the frequency values correspond<strong>in</strong>g<br />
to the channel numbers were used to draw the theoretical<br />
flow karyotype.<br />
112 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
A<br />
B<br />
A<br />
Fig. 1. Synchronized rice root-tip cells show<strong>in</strong>g high<br />
metaphase <strong>in</strong>dex. <strong>Rice</strong> seedl<strong>in</strong>gs about 0.5 cm long<br />
were treated with 0.5 mM hydroxyurea at 30 °C for 4<br />
h, washed three times with sterile water, <strong>in</strong>cubated <strong>in</strong><br />
Hoagland solution for 30 m<strong>in</strong>, and then treated with<br />
0.3 µM triflural<strong>in</strong> for 3 h, followed by <strong>in</strong>cubation <strong>in</strong><br />
sterile water for 15 m<strong>in</strong>. A shows many metaphase<br />
chromosomes of rice <strong>in</strong> a large area. B shows a higher<br />
magnification of rice metaphase chromosomes. Scale<br />
bar = 10 µm.<br />
Results and discussion<br />
Cell-cycle synchronization and metaphase<br />
accumulation<br />
<strong>Rice</strong> root-tip cells were efficiently synchronized us<strong>in</strong>g hydroxyurea<br />
and triflural<strong>in</strong>. Although hydroxyurea <strong>in</strong>hibits S-phase<br />
progress, DNA synthesis occurs slowly after certa<strong>in</strong> hours of<br />
hydroxyurea treatment (Lee et al 1996). The optimal concentration<br />
and duration of hydroxyurea are critical for effective<br />
cell synchronization. Lee et al (1996, 1997a) obta<strong>in</strong>ed a<br />
metaphase <strong>in</strong>dex higher than 70% <strong>in</strong> maize and wheat root-tip<br />
cells by treat<strong>in</strong>g hydroxyurea and triflural<strong>in</strong>. Our results showed<br />
that 0.5-mM hydroxyurea treatment for 4 h followed by a 30-<br />
m<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>cubation <strong>in</strong> hydroxyurea-free solution was effective <strong>in</strong><br />
synchroniz<strong>in</strong>g cell cycles of rice root tips. A high concentration<br />
(more than 1 mM) of hydroxyurea synchronized G1-phase<br />
cells while the mitotic <strong>in</strong>dex was relatively low.<br />
Triflural<strong>in</strong> is a better metaphase block<strong>in</strong>g reagent for<br />
accumulat<strong>in</strong>g cereal metaphase cells than colchic<strong>in</strong>e or<br />
amiprophos-methyl (see Lee et al 1996, 1997a). A 3-h treatment<br />
of 0.3 µM triflural<strong>in</strong> accumulated metaphase cells up to<br />
57.6%, rang<strong>in</strong>g from 51.1% to 63.3% <strong>in</strong> root-tip meristematic<br />
area (Fig. 1). A longer treatment (more than 4 h) <strong>in</strong>creased the<br />
number of chromosome clumps and chromatids <strong>in</strong> the chromosome<br />
preparation. A shorter treatment (1–2 h) resulted <strong>in</strong><br />
better chromosome spreads but reduced mitotic <strong>in</strong>dex. The<br />
duration of the triflural<strong>in</strong> treatment may need to be adjusted<br />
based on the uses of chromosomes. A 1-h triflural<strong>in</strong> treatment<br />
was enough to obta<strong>in</strong> prometaphase chromosomes.<br />
As Lee et al (1996, 1997a) po<strong>in</strong>ted out <strong>in</strong> previous reports,<br />
a high metaphase <strong>in</strong>dex <strong>in</strong> rice depended upon the uniformity<br />
of germ<strong>in</strong>ated seedl<strong>in</strong>gs. Selection of 0.5-cm-long seedl<strong>in</strong>gs<br />
at treatment time produced repeatedly high metaphase<br />
<strong>in</strong>dices. Optimal parameters for accumulat<strong>in</strong>g metaphase chromosomes<br />
<strong>in</strong> rice root tips were obta<strong>in</strong>ed by treat<strong>in</strong>g 0.5-cmlong<br />
seedl<strong>in</strong>gs with 0.5 mM hydroxyurea for 4 h, <strong>in</strong>cubat<strong>in</strong>g<br />
for 30 m<strong>in</strong> after remov<strong>in</strong>g the hydroxyurea, followed by treatment<br />
with 0.3 µM triflural<strong>in</strong> for 3 h.<br />
In addition to the accumulation of metaphase cells, enzymatic<br />
maceration of fixed roots resulted <strong>in</strong> good chromosome<br />
spread<strong>in</strong>g. After triflural<strong>in</strong> treatment, <strong>in</strong>cubat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> dis-<br />
Counts<br />
40<br />
30<br />
20<br />
10<br />
B<br />
Cell debris<br />
Chromosomes<br />
Clumps<br />
Nuclei<br />
G1 G2<br />
0<br />
10 2 10 3 10 4 10 5 10 6<br />
FL3-H<br />
Long PI flourescence <strong>in</strong>tensity<br />
Fig. 2. Flow-sorted rice chromosomes. (A) The figure<br />
on the left shows a low magnification of flow-sorted<br />
rice chromosomes; the figure on the right shows a high<br />
magnification and observed flow karyotypes. (B) <strong>Rice</strong><br />
chromosomes were sorted from all of the chromosome<br />
peaks. Relative propidium iodide fluorescence <strong>in</strong>tensity<br />
on a log scale showed G1 and G2 nuclei, chromosome<br />
clumps, chromosomes, and cell debris. Scale bar<br />
= 5 µm.<br />
tilled water for 15 m<strong>in</strong> reduced chromosome clumps <strong>in</strong> chromosome<br />
preparations. The modified carbolfuchs<strong>in</strong> dye (5%)<br />
showed better sta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g of rice chromosomes compared with<br />
ord<strong>in</strong>ary acetocarm<strong>in</strong>e or aceto-orce<strong>in</strong> sta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g.<br />
Flow cytometric analysis<br />
Flow cytometric analysis was performed us<strong>in</strong>g isolated<br />
metaphase chromosomes sta<strong>in</strong>ed with propidium iodide. Figure<br />
2 shows rice sorted chromosomes and flow karyotypes<br />
based on relative PI fluorescence <strong>in</strong>tensity of chromosomes<br />
on a log scale. Peaks correspond<strong>in</strong>g to nuclei, chromosome<br />
clumps, chromosomes, chromatids, and cellular debris were<br />
identified. The morphology of sorted chromosomes was fairly<br />
well preserved. Sorted chromosomes can be used for cytological<br />
analysis such as <strong>in</strong> situ hybridization or chromosome mapp<strong>in</strong>g<br />
us<strong>in</strong>g imag<strong>in</strong>g methods. Similar flow karyotypes were<br />
observed <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>dica (IR36) and japonica rice (M202) (data not<br />
shown).<br />
Figure 3 shows the rice theoretical flow karyotypes and<br />
experimental flow karyotypes. The experimental flow karyotypes<br />
(Fig. 3B) were similar to the theoretical flow karyotypes<br />
(Fig. 3A). Usually, the theoretical flow karyotypes are constructed<br />
based on relative chromosome sizes (Arumuganathan<br />
et al 1991, Lee et al 1996, 1997a), assum<strong>in</strong>g that DNA content<br />
is correlated with chromosome size. However, the DNA content<br />
of chromosomes was not always correlated with chromosome<br />
size (Lee et al 1997b) because flow cytometry measures<br />
the amount of fluorescence <strong>in</strong>tensity. The sta<strong>in</strong>ability or aff<strong>in</strong>ity<br />
of the DNA-specific fluorochrome dye, or the condensation<br />
of chromat<strong>in</strong> fibers, is not uniform along the whole length<br />
of a chromosome. A flow karyotype constructed based on DNA<br />
content of <strong>in</strong>dividual chromosomes would be more reliable<br />
Genetic diversity, evolution, and alien <strong>in</strong>trogression 113
Frequency<br />
9<br />
A<br />
8<br />
10, 11, 12<br />
CV = 4%<br />
7<br />
8, 9<br />
6<br />
5<br />
5, 6, 7<br />
4<br />
3<br />
4 2, 3<br />
2<br />
1<br />
1<br />
0<br />
0 200 400 600 800 1,000<br />
Channel number<br />
Counts<br />
20<br />
15<br />
10<br />
5<br />
Chromosomes<br />
0<br />
0 200 400 600 800 1,000<br />
FL2-A<br />
L<strong>in</strong>ear PI flourescence <strong>in</strong>tensity<br />
Fig. 3. Theoretical (A) and observed (B) flow karyotypes of rice<br />
on a l<strong>in</strong>ear scale. Theoretical flow karyotypes were constructed<br />
based on relative chromosome size data (Fukui and Iijima 1991)<br />
us<strong>in</strong>g 4% CV. Observed flow karyotypes had patterns similar to<br />
those of theoretical flow karyotypes.<br />
than one made based on relative chromosome size. Chromosome<br />
peaks on the flow karyotype can be used to identify specific<br />
chromosome types us<strong>in</strong>g imag<strong>in</strong>g methods (Iijima et al<br />
1991).<br />
Results showed that it is possible to accumulate large<br />
numbers of metaphase chromosomes from rice root-tip meristematic<br />
cells. The procedures described can be used to sort<br />
high-quality metaphase chromosomes. These sorted chromosomes<br />
allow the construction of rice chromosome-specific libraries.<br />
References<br />
Arumuganathan K, Earle ED. 1991. Nuclear DNA content of some<br />
important plant species. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 9:208-218.<br />
Arumuganathan K, Slattery JP, Tanksley SD, Earle ED. 1991. Preparation<br />
and flow cytometric analysis of metaphase chromosomes<br />
of tomato. Theor. Appl. Genet. 82:101-111.<br />
Fukui K, Iijima K. 1991. Somatic chromosome map of rice by imag<strong>in</strong>g<br />
methods. Theor. Appl. Genet. 81:589-596.<br />
Iijima K, Kakeda K, Fukui K. 1991. Identification and characterization<br />
of somatic rice chromosomes by imag<strong>in</strong>g methods. Theor.<br />
Appl. Genet. 81:597-605.<br />
Kao KN. 1982. Sta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g methods for protoplasts and cells. In: Wetter<br />
LR, Constabel F, editors. Plant tissue culture methods.<br />
Saskatoon, Sask. (Canada): National Research Council of<br />
Canada. p 67-71.<br />
Lee JH, Arumuganathan K, Kaeppler SM, Kaeppler HF, Papa CM.<br />
1996. Cell synchronization and isolation of metaphase chromosomes<br />
from maize (Zea mays L.) root tips for flow<br />
cytometric analysis and sort<strong>in</strong>g. Genome 39:697-703.<br />
Lee JH, Arumuganathan K, Yen Y, Kaeppler S, Kaeppler H,<br />
Baenziger PS. 1997a. Root tip cell cycle synchronization and<br />
metaphase chromosome isolation suitable for flow sort<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><br />
common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Genome 40:633-638.<br />
Lee JH, Yen Y, Arumuganathan K, Baenziger PS. 1997b. DNA content<br />
of wheat monosomics at <strong>in</strong>terphase estimated by flow<br />
cytometry. Theor. Appl. Genet. 95:1300-1304.<br />
Pan WH, Houben A, Schlegel R. 1993. Highly effective cell synchronization<br />
<strong>in</strong> plant roots by hydroxyurea and<br />
amiprophos-methyl or colchic<strong>in</strong>e. Genome 36:387-390.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ addresses: J.H. Lee, Y.S. Chung, D.H. Kim, K.Y. Kim,<br />
J.W. Kim, O.C. Kwon, Faculty of Life Science and Natural<br />
Resources, Dong-A University, Pusan 604-714, Korea; J.S.<br />
Sh<strong>in</strong>, Graduate School of Biotechnology, Korea University,<br />
Seoul 136-701, South Korea.<br />
Acknowledgment: This research was f<strong>in</strong>ancially supported by Dong-<br />
A University.<br />
114 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
High-resolution fluorescence <strong>in</strong> situ hybridization (FISH)<br />
for gene mapp<strong>in</strong>g and molecular analysis of rice<br />
chromosomes<br />
N. Ohmido and K. Fukui<br />
Fluorescence <strong>in</strong> situ hybridization (FISH) has been an effective technique for physical mapp<strong>in</strong>g of genes and repetitive DNA<br />
sequences on plant chromosomes. Unique rice genomic DNA sequences rang<strong>in</strong>g from 399 kb (YAC) to 1.29 kb (plasmid) were<br />
localized on rice chromosomes us<strong>in</strong>g FISH. The detection sensitivity of FISH us<strong>in</strong>g rice chromosomes has improved considerably.<br />
Extended DNA fibers (EDFs) achieve high spatial resolution and allow quantitative analysis to estimate copy numbers of<br />
tandemly repeated sequences <strong>in</strong> the rice genome. Applications of EDF-FISH and comb<strong>in</strong>g techniques have allowed spatial<br />
resolutions to <strong>in</strong>crease up to 1 kb between adjacent targets and sensitivity up to 300 bp. The significance of advanced<br />
molecular cytogenetic techniques and studies on the rice genome us<strong>in</strong>g high-resolution FISH, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g EDF-FISH, are discussed.<br />
In this study, we detected genes with several sizes of DNA,<br />
<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g agriculturally important genes. A YAC (yeast artificial<br />
chromosome) clone with an <strong>in</strong>sert size of 399 kb was detected<br />
at the end of rice chromosome 1 us<strong>in</strong>g fluorescence <strong>in</strong><br />
situ hybridization (FISH). A bacterial artificial chromosome<br />
(BAC) clone with an <strong>in</strong>sert size of 180 kb was detected at the<br />
end of chromosome 2 (Fig. 1A). The BAC clone conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />
the rice leaf blast resistance gene (Pi-b) was revealed at the<br />
distal end of the long arm of chromosome 2 (2q2.1) (Figs. 1B,<br />
1C, and 1D). A cosmid (35 kb) with the resistance gene (Xa21)<br />
aga<strong>in</strong>st bacterial blight was mapped on the <strong>in</strong>terstitial region<br />
of the long arm on chromosome 11 (11q1.3). Detection sensitivity<br />
has been <strong>in</strong>creased to detect even a restriction fragment<br />
length polymorphism (RFLP) marker of only 1.29 kb. The<br />
clone was mapped successfully to the distal region of the long<br />
arm of rice chromosome 4 (4q2.1) (Ohmido et al 1998).<br />
These results clearly demonstrated that the physical position<br />
of functional rice genes with various sizes can be detected<br />
on rice chromosomes. The sensitivity for detect<strong>in</strong>g rice<br />
A B C D<br />
Fig. 1. (A-D) Physical mapp<strong>in</strong>g of a BAC clone on rice chromosome<br />
2. (A) The location of BAC clone (180 kb) us<strong>in</strong>g FISH. Green<br />
fluorescence signals appear at the end of chromosome 2. (B)<br />
Enlarged images of the signal-tagged chromosome 2. Centromere<br />
position is <strong>in</strong>dicated by arrow. (C) The signal locations are mapped<br />
on the rice chromosome as green dots. (D) Position of the clones<br />
on the rice genetic map developed by Causse et al (1994). Red<br />
box <strong>in</strong>dicates the centromeric regions. A red bar <strong>in</strong>dicates genetic<br />
position of the BAC clone. Bar <strong>in</strong>dicates 5 µm.<br />
21<br />
11<br />
11<br />
21<br />
DNAs has been improved 400-fold based on the probe size.<br />
DNA sequences that have been physically mapped can be used<br />
effectively to fill <strong>in</strong> gaps <strong>in</strong> molecular contiguous maps and to<br />
determ<strong>in</strong>e the actual physical distance between the DNA markers.<br />
The structural characteristics of a chromosome where the<br />
markers are densely or sparsely distributed can be analyzed<br />
by us<strong>in</strong>g FISH. The relationship between the gene position<br />
and the recomb<strong>in</strong>ation value can be analyzed.<br />
Highly sensitive physical mapp<strong>in</strong>g us<strong>in</strong>g extended DNA fibers<br />
In general, the space-resolv<strong>in</strong>g power of FISH between highly<br />
condensed metaphase chromosomes and <strong>in</strong>terphase nuclei is<br />
different. It has been reported that the spatial resolution of two<br />
closely located nucleotide sequences by FISH on mitotic chromosomes<br />
is 2–5 Mbp and 100 kb on a nucleus. The spatial<br />
resolution <strong>in</strong> pachytene chromosomes ranges from 1.2 Mbp to<br />
120 kb at heterochromatic and euchromatic regions, respectively<br />
(de Jong et al 1999).<br />
To analyze the term<strong>in</strong>al structure of rice chromosomes<br />
at the molecular level, FISH was performed us<strong>in</strong>g telomere<br />
and subtelomeric sequences of rice. In our studies, four different<br />
FISH targets such as mitotic chromosomes, somatic nuclei,<br />
meiotic chromosomes, and extended DNA fibers were<br />
exam<strong>in</strong>ed. Chromosome FISH revealed the presence of telomere<br />
sequences at all the ends of rice chromosomes. Two TrsA<br />
loci were also detected <strong>in</strong> haploid rice plants (Fig. 2A). Identify<strong>in</strong>g<br />
rice chromosomes based on the condensation pattern<br />
(Fukui and Iijima 1991) before and/or after FISH revealed that<br />
the two chromosomes with TrsA were the long arms of chromosomes<br />
6 and 12, respectively. The <strong>in</strong>terphase mapp<strong>in</strong>g of<br />
TrsA and telomere sequences us<strong>in</strong>g diploid plants showed that<br />
there were four TrsA sites with<strong>in</strong> a japonica rice nucleus (Fig.<br />
2B). TrsA signals were close to the telomere signals <strong>in</strong> the<br />
<strong>in</strong>terphase nucleus but did not completely overlap.<br />
Genetic diversity, evolution, and alien <strong>in</strong>trogression 115
A<br />
B<br />
A<br />
B<br />
C<br />
Fig. 2. Multicolor fluorescence <strong>in</strong> situ hybridization (McFISH) on<br />
haploid rice chromosomes and nuclei. (A) McFISH for rice<br />
prometaphase chromosomes simultaneously us<strong>in</strong>g TrsA and telomere<br />
sequences as probes. Chromosomes 6 and 12 are <strong>in</strong>dicated<br />
by solid and open arrowheads, respectively. (B) McFISH on<br />
a rice nucleus. Bar <strong>in</strong>dicates 10 µm.<br />
Molecular analysis us<strong>in</strong>g extended DNA fibers<br />
Fig. 3. Visualization of the term<strong>in</strong>al structure of rice chromosome<br />
on extended DNA fibers (EDFs). (A) EDFs sta<strong>in</strong>ed with YOYO-1. (B)<br />
EDFs sta<strong>in</strong>ed with DAPI. (C) Multicolor FISH on EDFs with TrsA<br />
(red) and telomeric sequences [TTTAGGG] n (green). Bars <strong>in</strong>dicate<br />
5 µm.<br />
Partial overlapp<strong>in</strong>g showed that TrsA and telomere sequences<br />
did not m<strong>in</strong>gle with each other but occupied <strong>in</strong>dividual positions.<br />
However, when the two DNA sequences were located<br />
close together, they could not be resolved us<strong>in</strong>g ord<strong>in</strong>ary FISH<br />
on chromosomes and nuclei. Thus, the space-resolv<strong>in</strong>g power<br />
by FISH was improved on DNA fibers released from rice nuclei.<br />
Recently, dramatic progress has been made <strong>in</strong> physical<br />
mapp<strong>in</strong>g with adjacent DNA clones us<strong>in</strong>g FISH on extended<br />
DNA fibers (EDFs) <strong>in</strong> both mammals and plants (Jackson et al<br />
1998, Ohmido et al 2000).<br />
To prepare rice EDFs, rice nuclei were isolated from<br />
fresh rice seedl<strong>in</strong>gs. The isolated nuclei were then pipetted<br />
onto one end of a glass slide and disrupted <strong>in</strong> a lysis buffer for<br />
a few m<strong>in</strong>utes. DNA fibers were stretched by tilt<strong>in</strong>g the glass<br />
slides to an angle of 45 degrees. When the buffer floated downward<br />
to the other end of the slide, DNA fibers were thus released<br />
and extended. Each s<strong>in</strong>gle nucleotide strand was visualized<br />
after sta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g with YOYO-1 (Fig. 3A), a DNA-b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g<br />
green fluorescent dye that is more <strong>in</strong>tense than DAPI (Fig.<br />
3B).<br />
FISH on the extended DNA fibers us<strong>in</strong>g TrsA as the<br />
probe depicts clear “beads-on-a-str<strong>in</strong>g”-like green fluorescent<br />
signal tracks. The shorter stretches of TrsA signals were determ<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
to correspond to the TrsA site from chromosome 6,<br />
based on the weaker <strong>in</strong>tensity of the fluorescent signal <strong>in</strong> the<br />
chromosome FISH. Chromosome 12, which had a larger copy<br />
number of TrsA than chromosome 6, showed longer stretches<br />
of fluorescent signal. Fluorescent patterns of parallel-runn<strong>in</strong>g<br />
l<strong>in</strong>ear tracks of red (TrsA) and green spots (telomere) were<br />
observed after multicolor EDF-FISH, simultaneously us<strong>in</strong>g<br />
both TrsA and the telomere sequences as probes (Fig. 3C).<br />
Signals from the telomeric sequences appeared as one or a<br />
few dots at one end of the TrsA signal tracks, <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g that<br />
the telomere sequences were much shorter than TrsA. Results<br />
also <strong>in</strong>dicated that the TrsA and the telomere sequences were<br />
located <strong>in</strong> tandem with a few <strong>in</strong>terven<strong>in</strong>g sequences less than a<br />
few kilobases long. TrsA and telomere signal tracks were measured<br />
us<strong>in</strong>g CHIAS III (Kato and Fukui 1998) for the quantitative<br />
analysis of EDF-FISH. The copy numbers of TrsA (unit<br />
length: 355bp, Ohtsubo et al 1991) on chromosomes 6 and 12<br />
were estimated to be 682 and 231 copies, respectively. For<br />
this estimation, the conversion factor, one microscopic length<br />
µm equals 3,270 bp nucleotide length, was applied. Both the<br />
telomeric repeats on chromosomes 6 and 12 were observed as<br />
a few dots of green fluorescence signals and were calculated<br />
as 3.2 kb on average. Comparison of the lengths of telomere<br />
sequences between <strong>in</strong>dica and japonica rice us<strong>in</strong>g EDF-FISH<br />
revealed that telomere sequences <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>dica rice are three times<br />
longer than those <strong>in</strong> japonica rice.<br />
The molecular comb<strong>in</strong>g technique is a derivative of the<br />
EDF-FISH. DNA comb<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> conjunction with FISH enables<br />
high-resolution visual mapp<strong>in</strong>g of the multiple gene clusters<br />
on the large DNA fragment (Jackson et al 1999). EDF-FISH<br />
with high space-resolv<strong>in</strong>g power is now available to quantitatively<br />
analyze the length of repetitive sequences. Furthermore,<br />
order<strong>in</strong>g of genes, which is important for chromosome walk<strong>in</strong>g<br />
and contiguous mapp<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> genome research, is visually<br />
atta<strong>in</strong>ed by the FISH method.<br />
References<br />
Causse MA, Fulton TM, Cho YG, Ahn SN, Chunwongse J, Wu K,<br />
Xiao J, Yu Z, Ronald PC, Harr<strong>in</strong>gton SE, Second G, McCouch<br />
SR, Tanksley SD. 1994. Saturated molecular map of the rice<br />
genome based on an <strong>in</strong>terspecific backcross population. <strong>Genetics</strong><br />
138:1251-1274.<br />
de Jong JH, Fransz P, Zabel P. 1999. High resolution FISH <strong>in</strong> plants—<br />
techniques and applications. Trends Plant Sci. 4:258-263.<br />
Fukui K, Iijima K. 1991. Somatic chromosome map of rice by imag<strong>in</strong>g<br />
methods. Theor. Appl. Genet. 81:589-596.<br />
Jackson SA, Wang ML, Goodman HM, Jiang J. 1998. Application<br />
of fiber-FISH <strong>in</strong> physical mapp<strong>in</strong>g of Arabidopsis thaliana.<br />
Genome 41:566-572.<br />
Jackson SA, Dong F, Jiang J. 1999. Digital mapp<strong>in</strong>g of bacterial<br />
artificial chromosomes by fluorescence <strong>in</strong> situ hybridization.<br />
Plant J. 17:581-587.<br />
116 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
Kato S, Fukui K. 1998. Condensation pattern (CP) analysis us<strong>in</strong>g a<br />
newly developed chromosome image analyz<strong>in</strong>g system<br />
(CHIAS III). Chromosome Res. 6:473-479.<br />
Ohmido N, Akiyama Y, Fukui K. 1998. Physical mapp<strong>in</strong>g of unique<br />
nucleotide sequences on identified rice chromosomes. Plant<br />
Mol. Biol. 38:1043-1052.<br />
Ohmido N, Kijima K, Akiyama Y, de Jong JH, Fukui K. 2000. Quantification<br />
of total genomic DNA and selected repetitive sequences<br />
reveals concurrent changes <strong>in</strong> different DNA families<br />
<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>dica and japonica rice. Mol. Gen. Genet. 263:388-<br />
394.<br />
Ohtsubo H, Umeda M, Ohtsubo E. 1991. Organization of DNA sequences<br />
highly repeated <strong>in</strong> tandem <strong>in</strong> rice genome. Jpn. J.<br />
Genet. 66:241-254.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ addresses: N. Ohmido, Hokuriku National Agricultural<br />
Experiment Station, Joetsu 943-0193, Japan; K. Fukui, Department<br />
of Biotechnology, Graduate School of Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g,<br />
Osaka University, Suita 565-0871, Osaka, Japan.<br />
Analysis of meiosis <strong>in</strong> rice after mutagenic treatment<br />
N.A. Khailenko, A.I. Sedlovskiy, and L.N. Tyup<strong>in</strong>a<br />
We studied meiosis <strong>in</strong> mutagen-treated populations of rice. The treatment consisted of gamma rays (10, 15, and 20 KR),<br />
ethylmethane sulfonate (EMS) <strong>in</strong> 0.2%, 0.4%, and 0.6% concentration for 12 h, and comb<strong>in</strong>ations of gamma rays (10, 15, 20<br />
KR) and EMS (0.2%). Cultivar Dubovskiy-129 had normal meiosis with the regular formation of 12 bivalents with the second<br />
division of meiosis show<strong>in</strong>g normal anaphases and tetrads. All pollen gra<strong>in</strong>s were fertile. The mutagen-treated population<br />
showed chlorophyll mutations and various other changes <strong>in</strong> morphological traits. Meiotic abnormalities were observed <strong>in</strong> EMS<br />
treatments; 26% of the cells showed chromosome fragments. Chromosome stick<strong>in</strong>ess was common <strong>in</strong> some treatments,<br />
<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g the occurrence of polyploid cells. Variants (20 KR + 0.2% EMS) with univalents were recorded.<br />
In the study of meiosis of cultivars, mutants are an important<br />
spectrum of chromosomal variations and changes, and are used<br />
to determ<strong>in</strong>e morphological traits. Research on meiosis is hampered<br />
because chromosomes of rice are extremely small. Also,<br />
chromosomes of rice are poorly sta<strong>in</strong>ed with acetocarm<strong>in</strong>e and<br />
aceto-orce<strong>in</strong>.<br />
In the literature, there is practically no research on meiotic<br />
processes <strong>in</strong> rice. Several authors studied the meiotic behavior<br />
of chromosomes <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>terspecific hybrids of rice and <strong>in</strong><br />
amphidiploids. However, limited literature is available <strong>in</strong> Russian<br />
on rice cytology.<br />
After mutagenic treatment, a high frequency of chromosomal<br />
aberrations, translocations, bridges, fragments, and laggards<br />
has been reported.<br />
We studied the meiosis of cultivars and plants of the first<br />
generation after treatment by various mutagens to explore the<br />
possibility of accelerat<strong>in</strong>g breed<strong>in</strong>g work and def<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the productivity<br />
of rice under conditions of the Almaty region.<br />
Materials and methods<br />
The materials were two cultivars, Dubovskiy-129 and<br />
Alakulskiy, one dwarf rice from the world collection VIR (C-<br />
5467), three samples of breed<strong>in</strong>g l<strong>in</strong>es (N 348, N 14/282, and<br />
N 119/27), and M 1 plants of Dubovskiy-129 after treatment<br />
by mutagens. Gamma rays (10, 15, 20 KR), ethylmethane sulfonate<br />
(EMS) <strong>in</strong> 0.2%, 0.4%, and 0.6% concentration for 12<br />
h, and comb<strong>in</strong>ations of gamma rays (10, 15, 20 KR) and EMS<br />
(0.2%) were used as treatments. Plants were grown <strong>in</strong> the Ma<strong>in</strong><br />
Botanical Garden of the Academy of Sciences RK and <strong>in</strong> the<br />
experimental field (Southern Pribalchashie).<br />
The technique of fix<strong>in</strong>g flowers and sta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g meiotic<br />
chromosomes with some modifications (Khailenko and<br />
Sedlovskiy 1998) was followed. Young panicles of rice were<br />
fixed at 0600–0800 under 14–15 h of daylight <strong>in</strong> Almaty and<br />
10–11 h <strong>in</strong> Southern Pribalchashie. The shoots were fixed with<br />
a length of latter <strong>in</strong>ternode from 0 to 12 cm and a length of<br />
panicle from 2 to 12 cm. The flowers of young rice panicles<br />
were fixed on Newcomer. The material was stored <strong>in</strong> a refrigerator.<br />
Results and discussion<br />
Meiosis was normal for all rice accessions studied. In all meiotic<br />
phases, the chromosomes paired completely. The number<br />
of bivalents <strong>in</strong> diak<strong>in</strong>esis and metaphase I was equal to 12.<br />
The meiosis showed normal anaphase and tetrads. The pollen<br />
gra<strong>in</strong>s were fertile (90–100%).<br />
After mutagen treatment, cv. Dubovskiy-129 <strong>in</strong> the first<br />
generation showed various chlorophyll mutations and numerous<br />
deviations <strong>in</strong> morphological traits. An analysis of meiosis<br />
revealed a wide spectrum of chromosome abnormalities <strong>in</strong> all<br />
mutagenic treatments.<br />
The number of cells with fragmentation of chromosomes<br />
ranged from 26% (0.2 EMS + 10 KR) to 80% (0.6% EMS).<br />
More often, especially after treatment by EMS, besides fragmentation<br />
of chromosomes, we observed formation of polyploid<br />
(32) cells. Rao (1977) and Sen and Misra (1975) ob-<br />
Genetic diversity, evolution, and alien <strong>in</strong>trogression 117
served the same past<strong>in</strong>g together of meiotic chromosomes and<br />
the formation of multivalents <strong>in</strong> microsporocytes of rice. The<br />
treatments comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g gamma rays and EMS <strong>in</strong>creased meiotic<br />
abnormalities, particularly with an <strong>in</strong>creased dose or exposure<br />
from 26% <strong>in</strong> variant 10 KR + 0.2% EMS to 68% <strong>in</strong><br />
variant 20 KR + 0.2% EMS. In the treatment 20 KR + 0.2%<br />
EMS, univalents were observed together with normal bivalents,<br />
and also lumps of chromat<strong>in</strong>.<br />
At anaphase I, cells with bridges and lagg<strong>in</strong>g chromosomes<br />
(3–7%) were observed occasionally. No micronucleus<br />
was seen <strong>in</strong> dyads. In some mutagenic treatments, an <strong>in</strong>significant<br />
number of cells with lagg<strong>in</strong>g chromosomes (4%) and micronuclei<br />
(5%) was observed.<br />
Rao (1977) observed a high frequency of chromosomal<br />
aberrations <strong>in</strong> gamma ray-treated populations, but no such abnormalities<br />
were seen <strong>in</strong> EMS treatments. In our experiments,<br />
treatment by EMS (0.6%) led to even more chromosome aberrations<br />
at the early stages of prophase I, particularly at diak<strong>in</strong>esis.<br />
Apparently, EMS causes not only asynapsis, but it also<br />
somehow promotes partial polyploidization of chromosomes.<br />
The same trend was observed under the comb<strong>in</strong>ation treatment<br />
of gamma rays and EMS: <strong>in</strong> cells of diplotene and diak<strong>in</strong>esis.<br />
In some sterile anthers, pollen gra<strong>in</strong>s did not come out and<br />
were covered with a common envelope. As a result, giant pollen<br />
gra<strong>in</strong>s were formed. Such “cytological rejection” will be<br />
useful for breeders. With this, it is possible to determ<strong>in</strong>e mutant<br />
plants before the head<strong>in</strong>g stage easily and quickly.<br />
Various k<strong>in</strong>ds of abnormalities <strong>in</strong> shape, size, and sta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />
ability of pollen gra<strong>in</strong>s were observed <strong>in</strong> mutagen-treated<br />
populations of rice.<br />
Mature pollen gra<strong>in</strong>s more often had one pore, but rarely<br />
two to three pores. The proportion of such pollen gra<strong>in</strong>s was<br />
<strong>in</strong>significant (0.25–3.7%), but it was higher than <strong>in</strong> control<br />
plants. It was possible that the gamma rays and EMS <strong>in</strong>fluenced<br />
a gene or group of genes that determ<strong>in</strong>e the formation<br />
of the pollen envelope.<br />
Meiosis show<strong>in</strong>g active division of cells <strong>in</strong> rice cultivars<br />
and other cereal plants under Almaty conditions occurs ma<strong>in</strong>ly<br />
dur<strong>in</strong>g the morn<strong>in</strong>g hours. Treatment by gamma rays and EMS<br />
causes several meiotic abnormalities, partial conjugation of<br />
chromosomes <strong>in</strong> prophase and metaphase I, lagg<strong>in</strong>g chromosomes<br />
and the formation of chromosomal and chromatid<br />
bridges <strong>in</strong> anaphase I, the formation of dyads and tetrads with<br />
micronuclei, <strong>in</strong>creased pollen sterility, and an abnormal pollen<br />
envelope. “Cytological rejection” of mutant rice plants after<br />
treatment by gamma rays and EMS would be helpful to<br />
breeders.<br />
References<br />
Khailenko NA, Sedlovskiy AI. 1998. Cytogenetic and<br />
cytoembryological studies of <strong>in</strong>terspecific and <strong>in</strong>tergeneric<br />
hybrid formation <strong>in</strong> soft spr<strong>in</strong>g wheat. Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs of the 9th<br />
<strong>International</strong> Wheat <strong>Genetics</strong> Symposium, Saskatoon,<br />
Saskatchewan, Canada. 2(1):56-58.<br />
Rao GM. 1977. Efficiency and effectivenes of gamma rays and EMS<br />
<strong>in</strong> rice. Cytologia 42(3-4):443-450.<br />
Sen P, Misra RN. 1975. Chromosome pair<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> an autotriploid rice.<br />
Curr. Sci. 44(24):905-906.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ address: Institute of Plant Physiology, <strong>Genetics</strong>, and<br />
Bioeng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g of National Centre on Biotechnology of Republic<br />
of Kazakhstan, 45 Timiryazev Str., 480090 Almaty,<br />
Kazakhstan.<br />
Genomic relationships of the AA genome Oryza species<br />
B.R. Lu, M.E.B. Naredo, A.B. Juliano, and M.T. Jackson<br />
The genomic relationships of the AA genome species were assessed by <strong>in</strong>traspecific and <strong>in</strong>terspecific hybridization. Crossability<br />
measured <strong>in</strong> terms of seed set varied greatly among the comb<strong>in</strong>ations, although hybrids were easily obta<strong>in</strong>ed. Intraspecific<br />
hybrids showed >40% panicle fertility. In general, panicle fertility was greatly reduced <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>terspecific hybrids, except for<br />
those obta<strong>in</strong>ed from the reciprocal crosses between Oryza nivara and O. rufipogon, O. rufipogon and O. sativa, and O. barthii<br />
and O. glaberrima that showed highly fertile hybrids. Meiosis was normal <strong>in</strong> both <strong>in</strong>tra- and <strong>in</strong>terspecific hybrids with normal<br />
chromosome pair<strong>in</strong>g at metaphase-I, except for a few hybrids <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g O. longistam<strong>in</strong>ata and O. meridionalis that showed<br />
slightly lower pair<strong>in</strong>g. We conclude that (1) the AA genome rice species are closely related <strong>in</strong> terms of their specific reproductive<br />
isolation and chromosome homology, (2) maximum exchange of genetic material can be achieved <strong>in</strong> the AA genome rice<br />
species through recomb<strong>in</strong>ation, and (3) gene transfer through conventional breed<strong>in</strong>g is highly applicable from the AA genome<br />
wild Oryza species.<br />
Eight Oryza species are classified <strong>in</strong> the O. sativa complex by<br />
Vaughan (1989) or <strong>in</strong> Ser. Sativae by Lu (1999), <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g<br />
two cultivated and six wild species. These species are morphologically<br />
similar <strong>in</strong> terms of their relatively large gra<strong>in</strong>s<br />
and long awns and <strong>in</strong>habit similar environments such as lakes<br />
and ponds, swamps, rivers, and canals under full sunsh<strong>in</strong>e. O.<br />
sativa is grown worldwide, whereas O. glaberrima is cultivated<br />
only <strong>in</strong> certa<strong>in</strong> farm<strong>in</strong>g systems <strong>in</strong> West Africa. Among<br />
the wild species, O. nivara and O. rufipogon are found <strong>in</strong> South<br />
and Southeast Asia, O. barthii and O. longistam<strong>in</strong>ata are widely<br />
118 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
distributed <strong>in</strong> sub-Saharan Africa, O. meridionalis is found <strong>in</strong><br />
tropical Australia and Irian Jaya (Lu and Silitonga 1999), and<br />
O. glumaepatula is native to South and Central America. Species<br />
<strong>in</strong> the Ser. Sativae share the genome, AA, which makes<br />
them the most accessible genetic resource <strong>in</strong> the Oryza gene<br />
pool for rice improvement.<br />
The assessment of species relationships can be achieved<br />
through <strong>in</strong>tra- and <strong>in</strong>terspecific hybridization, with crossability<br />
and fertility of F 1 hybrids as useful measures of species<br />
relatedness <strong>in</strong> plants (Naredo et al 1997, 1998). Analysis of<br />
chromosome pair<strong>in</strong>g at metaphase-I is also a useful tool <strong>in</strong><br />
assess<strong>in</strong>g genome homology among parental species, provided<br />
that no genetically controlled pair<strong>in</strong>g regulation is <strong>in</strong>volved.<br />
In this study, we conducted <strong>in</strong>tra- and <strong>in</strong>terspecific hybridization<br />
to determ<strong>in</strong>e the genomic relationships among the AA<br />
genome Oryza species assessed by chromosome homology <strong>in</strong><br />
addition to the estimation of reproductive barriers among the<br />
species.<br />
Intra- and <strong>in</strong>terspecific hybridization<br />
Crossability<br />
Crosses were made among all the AA genome Oryza species,<br />
and populations of the same species under screenhouse conditions<br />
at the Genetic Resources Center at <strong>IRRI</strong>. Percentage (%)<br />
seed set (number of seeds obta<strong>in</strong>ed divided by number of spikelets<br />
poll<strong>in</strong>ated) and panicle fertility were used to assess reproductive<br />
barriers between species. Table 1 summarizes the results<br />
from all possible comb<strong>in</strong>ations of <strong>in</strong>ter- and <strong>in</strong>traspecific<br />
crosses <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g more than 90,000 spikelets.<br />
Cross<strong>in</strong>g data from the various comb<strong>in</strong>ations revealed<br />
two general tendencies. First, hybridization among the AA genome<br />
Oryza species is achievable although crossability varied<br />
greatly among comb<strong>in</strong>ations. Seeds were obta<strong>in</strong>ed from all <strong>in</strong>traspecific<br />
comb<strong>in</strong>ations, with mean seed set vary<strong>in</strong>g from 7.2%<br />
to 30.7%. No seeds were obta<strong>in</strong>ed from the cross O.<br />
glumaepatula/O. glaberrima. Less than 3% seed set was observed<br />
<strong>in</strong> the crosses O. nivara/O. meridionalis (0.7%), O.<br />
longistam<strong>in</strong>ata/O. barthii (1.5%), O. rufipogon/O.<br />
meridionalis (2.4%), and O. sativa/O. meridionalis (2.4%). In<br />
contrast, high seed set was observed <strong>in</strong> the crosses O.<br />
meridionalis/O. glaberrima (52.0%), O. barthii/O. sativa<br />
(39.8%), O. nivara/O. glumaepatula (39.0%), and O. sativa/<br />
O. glumaepatula (36.5%).<br />
Second, considerable differences <strong>in</strong> seed set were observed<br />
between some reciprocal crosses. For <strong>in</strong>stance, <strong>in</strong><br />
crosses with O. longistam<strong>in</strong>ata as the female parent, seed set<br />
ranged from only 1.5% to 16.1% (mean = 6.9%) compared<br />
with a seed set of 10.4% to 25.7% (mean = 19.4%) when it<br />
was used as a pollen donor. In contrast, <strong>in</strong> crosses with O.<br />
meridionalis as the female parent, seed set ranged from 5.8%<br />
to 52.0% (mean = 20.2%); when it was used as a pollen donor,<br />
seed set ranged from only 0.7% to 16.9% (mean = 6.3%). Although<br />
no considerable difference <strong>in</strong> seed set was observed <strong>in</strong><br />
crosses with O. barthii as one parent, a relatively high seed set<br />
was observed <strong>in</strong> crosses <strong>in</strong> which it was used as the female<br />
parent (mean = 24.9%).<br />
In addition, we observed that, although seed set was generally<br />
high <strong>in</strong> crosses with O. longistam<strong>in</strong>ata as the male parent,<br />
the seeds were abnormal, with <strong>in</strong>complete development<br />
of endosperm or embryos. When used as the female parent,<br />
only the cross with O. glumaepatula produced hybrids. No<br />
hybrid plants were obta<strong>in</strong>ed from the crosses O. nivara/O.<br />
sativa, O. meridionalis/O. longistam<strong>in</strong>ata, O. meridionalis/<br />
O. sativa, O. sativa/O. meridionalis, and O. glaberrima/O.<br />
longistam<strong>in</strong>ata. In contrast, some comb<strong>in</strong>ations <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g O.<br />
meridionalis or O. rufipogon as one parent produced few but<br />
normal seeds that developed <strong>in</strong>to vigorous hybrid plants as<br />
with seeds from the other crosses. This suggested that reproductive<br />
isolat<strong>in</strong>g mechanisms operate both before and after<br />
fertilization among the AA genome Oryza species.<br />
Hybrid fertility<br />
Panicle fertility was based on the ratio of filled gra<strong>in</strong>s to the<br />
total number of gra<strong>in</strong>s from five <strong>in</strong>dividually bagged panicles.<br />
Table 1 shows that, <strong>in</strong> general, <strong>in</strong>traspecific crosses produced<br />
partially to highly fertile hybrids. Mean panicle fertility <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>traspecific<br />
hybrids ranged from 41.5% to 91.6%.<br />
In contrast, panicle fertility of <strong>in</strong>terspecific hybrids varied<br />
significantly, with either high or low fertility, <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g<br />
different categories of relationships among the AA genome<br />
species. Highly or partially fertile hybrids were obta<strong>in</strong>ed from<br />
the reciprocal crosses <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g O. glaberrima and O. barthii<br />
(82.4%, 77.2%), O. nivara and O. rufipogon (44.8%, 28%),<br />
and O. rufipogon and O. sativa (57.4%, 26.2%). The other<br />
<strong>in</strong>terspecific hybrids generally showed
Table 1. Crossability <strong>in</strong> AA genome Oryza species and meiotic analysis of <strong>in</strong>traspecific and <strong>in</strong>terspecific hybrids.<br />
Spikelets Mean Mean Pollen mother Meiotic configuration Chiasmata/<br />
Comb<strong>in</strong>ation poll<strong>in</strong>ated seed panicle cells observed PMC<br />
(no.) set (%) fertility (%) (no.) I II III IV<br />
Intraspecific crosses<br />
O. nivara/O. nivara 1,039 7.6 62.9 471 0.07 11.76 0 0.104 23.71<br />
O. rufipogon/O. rufipogon 5,220 7.2 49.6 900 0.12 11.92 0 0.008 23.37<br />
O. meridionalis/O. meridionalis 14,704 23.2 41.5 83 0.02 11.99 0 0 22.22<br />
O. glumaepatula/O. glumaepatula 2,353 27.3 85.6 200 0.12 11.90 0 0.020 23.68<br />
O. barthii/O. barthii 10,057 30.7 79.3 151 0.08 11.96 0 0 23.54<br />
O. longistam<strong>in</strong>ata/O. longistam<strong>in</strong>ata 4,894 17.6 91.6 a 201 2.91 10.17 0 0.189 20.48<br />
Interspecific crosses<br />
O. nivara ×<br />
O. rufipogon 3,674 12.7 44.8 1,177 0.10 11.94 0 0.008 23.34<br />
O. meridionalis 322 0.7 0.9 – – – – – –<br />
O. glumaepatula 804 39.0 1.6 100 0.12 11.94 0 0 23.52<br />
O. barthii 1,222 19.5 1.3 144 0.22 11.82 0 0.035 23.37<br />
O. longistam<strong>in</strong>ata 4,474 10.4 0.6 – – – – – –<br />
O. sativa 54 5.6 – – – – – – –<br />
O. glaberrima 170 24.9 0.1 146 0.04 11.98 0 0 23.82<br />
O. rufipogon ×<br />
O. nivara 3,236 6.1 28.4 300 0.20 11.85 0 0.024 23.22<br />
O. meridionalis 1,057 2.4 6.6 50 0 12.00 0 0 20.92<br />
O. glumaepatula 1,161 11.0 2.3 200 0.25 11.86 0 0.005 23.54<br />
O. barthii 2,198 15.4 0.7 150 0.79 11.61 0 0 22.70<br />
O. longistam<strong>in</strong>ata 7,408 13.6 6.2 50 0.24 10.40 0 0.740 23.04<br />
O. sativa 592 6.0 57.4 50 0 11.86 0 0.020 23.04<br />
O. glaberrima 155 17.7 5.6 – – – – – –<br />
O. meridionalis ×<br />
O. nivara 594 11.6 1.0 139 0.04 11.74 0.007 0.116 19.97<br />
O. rufipogon 1,126 12.9 8.7 250 0.08 11.86 0.004 0.048 21.84<br />
O. glumaepatula 890 14.0 0.4 100 0.04 11.98 0 0 23.66<br />
O. barthii 1,137 23.6 0.1 23 0 12.00 0 0 23.65<br />
O. longistam<strong>in</strong>ata 2,113 21.5 – – – – – – –<br />
O. sativa 262 5.8 – – – – – – –<br />
O. glaberrima 130 52.0 0.03 – – – – – –<br />
O. glumaepatula ×<br />
O. nivara 941 26.1 5.4 40 0.42 11.70 0.025 0.025 22.62<br />
cont<strong>in</strong>ued on next page<br />
meridionalis/O. nivara) to 23.83/PMC (O. barthii/O.<br />
meridionalis) was not significantly reduced compared with that<br />
of the parental materials (23.47 to 23.93/PMC, data not shown).<br />
This <strong>in</strong>dicated an extremely high homology among the AA<br />
genome <strong>in</strong> the different species studied.<br />
Multivalents were observed <strong>in</strong> some of the hybrids, suggest<strong>in</strong>g<br />
possible chromosomal translocation of the AA genome<br />
<strong>in</strong> different species or populations. Chromosome bridges were<br />
also found <strong>in</strong> some of the hybrids, caused more likely by the<br />
heterozygote of chromosomal <strong>in</strong>version <strong>in</strong> the hybrid.<br />
Conclusions<br />
Results <strong>in</strong>dicated that all the AA genome Oryza species have<br />
a relatively close relationship. The different AA genome species<br />
showed different patterns of species relationships as re-<br />
vealed by reproductive isolation data. O. meridionalis, O.<br />
glumaepatula, O. longistam<strong>in</strong>ata, O. rufipogon, and O. barthii<br />
showed significant isolation mechanisms and warrant <strong>in</strong>dependent<br />
species status. However, relationships among species from<br />
the same geographic locations, such as O. rufipogon, O. nivara,<br />
and O. sativa, or between O. barthii and O. glaberrima, are<br />
considerably close and it is possible to produce fertile <strong>in</strong>terspecific<br />
hybrids without much difficulty. Whether these taxa<br />
warrant <strong>in</strong>dependent taxonomic species status is questionable,<br />
although traditionally, it is practical to treat them as dist<strong>in</strong>ct<br />
species. Meiotic data revealed very limited differentiation<br />
among the AA genome species, <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g that they conta<strong>in</strong><br />
essentially identical genomes with high homology. Maximum<br />
exchange of genetic materials can be achieved <strong>in</strong> the AA genome<br />
Oryza species through conventional hybridization.<br />
120 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
Cont<strong>in</strong>ued from page 34.<br />
Spikelets Mean Mean Pollen mother Meiotic configuration Chiasmata/<br />
Comb<strong>in</strong>ation poll<strong>in</strong>ated seed panicle cells observed PMC<br />
(no.) set (%) fertility (%) (no.) I II III IV<br />
O. rufipogon 1,309 22.1 2.9 223 0.38 11.76 0 0.027 23.34<br />
O. meridionalis 546 10.2 0.7 100 0 12.00 0 0 23.70<br />
O. barthii 2,029 11.2 0.6 73 0.33 11.84 0 0 23.27<br />
O. longistam<strong>in</strong>ata 3,682 23.7 1.2 140 0.31 11.78 0 0.290 23.38<br />
O. sativa 153 24.6 1.4 – – – – – –<br />
O. glaberrima 40 0 – – – – – – –<br />
O. barthii ×<br />
O. nivara 2,405 23.0 1.1 167 0.27 11.75 0.006 0.054 23.62<br />
O. rufipogon 1,368 33.2 2.0 50 0.08 11.96 0 0 23.56<br />
O. meridionalis 574 8.5 0.4 24 0.08 11.96 0 0 23.83<br />
O. glumaepatula 1,641 20.2 0.4 100 0.30 11.69 0 0.080 23.19<br />
O. longistam<strong>in</strong>ata 5,279 24.8 6.7 – – – – – –<br />
O. sativa 534 39.8 1.6 50 0.48 11.76 0 0 23.52<br />
O. glaberrima 740 24.7 77.2 – – – – – –<br />
O. longistam<strong>in</strong>ata ×<br />
O. nivara 1,541 7.5 – – – – – – –<br />
O. rufipogon 1,902 3.1 – – – – – – –<br />
O. meridionalis 262 3.0 – – – – – – –<br />
O. glumaepatula 932 13.3 1.4 50 0.52 11.74 0 0 23.32<br />
O. barthii 1,898 1.5 – – – – – – –<br />
O. sativa 1,073 3.8 – – – – – – –<br />
O. glaberrima 78 16.1 – – – – – – –<br />
O. sativa ×<br />
O. nivara 300 20.9 11.9 – – – – – –<br />
O. rufipogon 647 10.5 26.2 200 0.11 11.94 0 0.005 23.70<br />
O. meridionalis 1,061 2.4 – – – – – – –<br />
O. glumaepatula 192 36.5 1.1 150 0.11 11.95 0 0 23.61<br />
O. barthii 602 12.3 0.3 – – – – – –<br />
O. longistam<strong>in</strong>ata 3,595 16.2 9.6 329 0.38 11.58 0 0.116 23.20<br />
O. glaberrima ×<br />
O. nivara 92 9.0 0.6 – – – – – –<br />
O. rufipogon 210 11.6 4.7 – – – – – –<br />
O. meridionalis 107 16.9 0.1 – – – – – –<br />
O. glumaepatula 490 24.1 0.8 – – – – – –<br />
O. barthii 1,022 31.4 82.4 30 0.10 11.90 0.033 0 23.47<br />
O. longistam<strong>in</strong>ata 997 25.7 – – – – – – –<br />
a Based on panicle sta<strong>in</strong>ability.<br />
References<br />
Li HW, Wang TS, Chen CC, Wang WH. 1962. Cytogenetic studies<br />
of Oryza sativa L. and its related species. 2. A prelim<strong>in</strong>ary<br />
note on the <strong>in</strong>terspecific hybrids with<strong>in</strong> the section Sativa<br />
Roschev. Bot. Bull. Acad. S<strong>in</strong>. 3:209-219.<br />
Lu BR. 1999. Taxonomy of the genus Oryza (Poaceae): historical<br />
perspective and current status. Int. <strong>Rice</strong> Res. Notes 24:4-8.<br />
Lu BR, Naredo MEB, Juliano A, Jackson MT. 1997. Hybridization<br />
of AA genome rice species from Asia and Australia. II. Meiotic<br />
analysis of Oryza meridionalis and its hybrids. Genet.<br />
Res. Crop. Evol. 44:25-31.<br />
Lu BR, Naredo MEB, Juliano A, Jackson MT. 1998. Taxonomic<br />
status of Oryza glumaepatula Steud., a diploid wild rice species<br />
from the New World. III. Assessment of genomic aff<strong>in</strong>ity<br />
among rice taxa from South America, Asia and Australia.<br />
Genet. Res. Crop. Evol. 45:215-223.<br />
Lu BR, Silitonga TS. 1999. Wild rice Oryza meridionalis was first<br />
found <strong>in</strong> Indonesia. Int. <strong>Rice</strong> Res. Notes 24(3):28.<br />
Naredo MEB, Juliano A, Lu BR, Jackson MT. 1997. Hybridization<br />
of AA genome rice species from Asia and Australia. I. Crosses<br />
and development of hybrids. Genet. Res. Crop. Evol. 44:17-<br />
24.<br />
Naredo MEB, Juliano A, Lu BR, Jackson MT. 1998. Taxonomic<br />
status of Oryza glumaepatula Steud., a diploid wild rice species<br />
from the New World. II. Hybridization among South<br />
American, Asian, and Australian AA genome species. Genet.<br />
Res. Crop. Evol. 45:205-214.<br />
Vaughan DA. 1989. The genus Oryza L.: current status of taxonomy.<br />
<strong>IRRI</strong> Res. Paper Ser. 138. Los Baños (Philipp<strong>in</strong>es): <strong>International</strong><br />
<strong>Rice</strong> Research Institute.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ address: B.R. Lu, M.E.B. Naredo, A.B. Juliano, and M.T.<br />
Jackson, Genetic Resources Center, <strong>IRRI</strong>, DAPO Box 7777,<br />
Metro Manila, Philipp<strong>in</strong>es.<br />
Genetic diversity, evolution, and alien <strong>in</strong>trogression 121
Characteriz<strong>in</strong>g hybrid and backcross derivatives<br />
of O. sativa × O. m<strong>in</strong>uta us<strong>in</strong>g species probes<br />
S.C. Tong, M.M. Clyde, Z. Zamrod, K. Narimah, and A.L. Mariam<br />
Introgression from Oryza m<strong>in</strong>uta <strong>in</strong> hybrid and backcross progenies from the cross O. sativa × O. m<strong>in</strong>uta was <strong>in</strong>vestigated us<strong>in</strong>g<br />
dot-blot hybridization with the genome-specific repetitive DNA probes pOm1, pOm4, and pOmPB10. Polymerase cha<strong>in</strong> reaction<br />
(PCR) was used to amplify the probes; the optimization was successful for pOm4 and pOmPB10. The amplified DNA<br />
fragments were labeled with digoxigen<strong>in</strong>-11-dUTP (DIG) us<strong>in</strong>g the random primed label<strong>in</strong>g technique. From this procedure, 66<br />
ng of pOm4 DNA and 76 ng of pOmPB10 DNA were labeled and used to test dot blots conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g genomic DNA from hybrid and<br />
backcross progenies of O. sativa × O. m<strong>in</strong>uta. Results of hybridization us<strong>in</strong>g the two probes were positive for all plants tested (2<br />
F 1<br />
hybrid plants, 5 BC 1<br />
plants, and 4 BC 2<br />
plants) except for one BC 2<br />
S12 plant, show<strong>in</strong>g that these plants are <strong>in</strong>trogressed with<br />
the O. m<strong>in</strong>uta genome. The BC 2<br />
S12 plant (2n = 24) did not show any <strong>in</strong>trogression.<br />
Transfer of resistance traits via wide hybridization between<br />
wild species of rice and the cultivated Oryza sativa has become<br />
an important part of rice breed<strong>in</strong>g programs (Jena and<br />
Khush 1989). The tetraploid species O. m<strong>in</strong>uta (BBCC genome)<br />
has been successfully used to transfer resistance to blast<br />
and bacterial blight (Amante-Bordeos et al 1992). O. m<strong>in</strong>uta<br />
is also known to be resistant to brown planthopper, whitebacked<br />
planthopper, and green leafhopper (Sitch 1990). To test for<br />
genome <strong>in</strong>trogression <strong>in</strong> backcross derivatives from such wide<br />
crosses, genome-specific DNA sequences have been developed<br />
for several species such as O. m<strong>in</strong>uta and O. australiensis,<br />
and their potential as markers <strong>in</strong> analyz<strong>in</strong>g genome <strong>in</strong>trogression<br />
was evaluated (Aswid<strong>in</strong>noor et al 1995). This study was<br />
conducted to detect <strong>in</strong>trogression from O. m<strong>in</strong>uta <strong>in</strong> backcross<br />
plants derived from crosses of O. sativa cultivars Setanjung<br />
and Mahsuri with O. m<strong>in</strong>uta.<br />
Materials and methods<br />
A total of 16 genotypes were used: F 1 hybrids, BC 1 and BC 2 ,<br />
and O. m<strong>in</strong>uta and O. sativa varieties Setanjung and Mahsuri.<br />
The backcross plants were produced <strong>in</strong> 1995 and are ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
<strong>in</strong> the greenhouse at Universiti Kebangsaan, Malaysia.<br />
The plasmids conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g genome-specific DNA pOm1,<br />
pOm4, and pOmPB10 (Aswid<strong>in</strong>noor et al 1991) were obta<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
courtesy of Prof. J.P. Gustafson from the University of Missouri,<br />
Columbia. Total genomic DNA was isolated from the<br />
plants us<strong>in</strong>g the protocol of Doyle and Doyle (1990). Approximately<br />
20–50 ng µL –1 of DNA <strong>in</strong> 100 mL of f<strong>in</strong>al suspension<br />
was obta<strong>in</strong>ed from each sample. Fragments from the plasmid<br />
were amplified by polymerase cha<strong>in</strong> reaction (PCR) us<strong>in</strong>g<br />
primer pairs designed based on sequences published <strong>in</strong><br />
Aswid<strong>in</strong>noor et al (1991). Table 1 gives the nucleotide sequences<br />
of the primer pairs.<br />
Each PCR reaction mixture consisted of 1 µL plasmid,<br />
1 µL F primer 10 pmol, 1 µL R primer 10 pmol, 5 µL 10X<br />
PCR buffer + MgCl 2 , 5 µL dNTP 2 mM, 0.05 µL Taq polymerase,<br />
and 36.5 µL ddH 2 O. The PCR was performed under<br />
the follow<strong>in</strong>g conditions: 94 ºC for 4 m<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>itially, denaturation<br />
at 94 ºC for 1 m<strong>in</strong>, anneal<strong>in</strong>g at 55 ºC for 1 m<strong>in</strong>, and<br />
extension at 72 ºC for 30 sec. After 30 cycles, f<strong>in</strong>al extension<br />
was at 72 ºC for 7 m<strong>in</strong>. The PCR product was purified us<strong>in</strong>g<br />
the High Pure PCR Template Preparation Kit (Boehr<strong>in</strong>ger<br />
Mannheim) accord<strong>in</strong>g to the manufacturer’s <strong>in</strong>structions.<br />
The DNA was labeled with DIG-High Prime label<strong>in</strong>g<br />
and detection starter kit II Cat. No. 1585614 (Boehr<strong>in</strong>ger<br />
Mannheim) and labeled DNA was quantified us<strong>in</strong>g the DIG<br />
quantification test strip. Dot-blot hybridization and detection<br />
were performed us<strong>in</strong>g anti-DIG-AP conjugate and antibody<br />
supplied <strong>in</strong> the detection kit. For hybridization, approximately<br />
equal amounts of DNA (3 µL) from each sample were spotted<br />
onto the membrane.<br />
Results and discussion<br />
The DNA fragments conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g genome-specific sequences<br />
pOm4 (270 bp) and pOmPB10 (245 bp) were successfully<br />
amplified and purified. However, results of PCR for pOm1<br />
(157 bp) yielded primer-dimers and nonspecific bands of longer<br />
molecular size than expected. Therefore, pOm1 was not used<br />
<strong>in</strong> the detection. However, pOm4 and pOmPB10 resulted <strong>in</strong><br />
PCR products with the expected sizes (Table 1). The amount<br />
of labeled DNA obta<strong>in</strong>ed was 66 ng for pOm4 and 76 ng for<br />
pOmPB10.<br />
The dot-blot experiment showed that the pOm4 probe<br />
hybridized with samples except for O. sativa varieties<br />
Setanjung and Mahsuri and the sample from plant B 2 S12 (Fig.<br />
1). This <strong>in</strong>dicated that the positive samples conta<strong>in</strong>ed DNA<br />
sequences homologous with the probes. Similar results were<br />
obta<strong>in</strong>ed when pOmPB10 was used as a probe, <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>trogression<br />
of the O. m<strong>in</strong>uta genome <strong>in</strong> the positive plants.<br />
The B 2 S12 plant did not show any hybridization to the<br />
pOmPB10 probe. In contrast to other samples, plant B 2 M7<br />
showed reduced hybridization signals to both pOm4 and<br />
pOmPB10 probes. These results suggested that the amount of<br />
<strong>in</strong>trogressed O. m<strong>in</strong>uta genome <strong>in</strong> B 2 M7 was less than <strong>in</strong> the<br />
other positive plants.<br />
122 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
Table 1. Nucleotide sequence of primer pairs for pOm1, pOm4, and<br />
pOmPB10.<br />
Primer pair Nucleotide sequence Size a<br />
(bp)<br />
pOm1 F 5′ AAG GGA ATA TGT TTG GCC CCA TTG G 3′ 157<br />
pOm1 R 3′ GTA ACC AAC ACT TTT ACT TAA A 5′<br />
pOm4 F 5′ TGA TTC TAA GAT CGG CAT GTC TAT T 3′ 270<br />
pOm4 R 3′ CGA TAA GGC ATT GAC CCA TCA ATA T 5′<br />
pOmPB10 F 5′ GAA GCA AGC ATC TCG GAG TTG GAA T 3′ 245<br />
pOmPB10 R 3′ AAT CCC CTC CGT CGT ATG TAT AAC C 5′<br />
a Expected size of PCR product.<br />
O. m<strong>in</strong>uta<br />
O. sativa var. Setanjung<br />
F 1<br />
S4<br />
B 1<br />
M6<br />
B 1<br />
S1<br />
B 1<br />
S3<br />
B 2<br />
S12<br />
O. sativa var. Mahsuri<br />
F 1<br />
S<br />
B 1<br />
M5<br />
B 1<br />
M7<br />
B 1<br />
S2<br />
B 2<br />
M7<br />
B 2<br />
M13<br />
Cytological analysis showed that the BC 1 plants have<br />
44 to 48 chromosomes, whereas the BC 2 plants, except for<br />
B 2 S12, have 30 to 37 chromosomes (Mariam et al 1996). Thus,<br />
positive hybridization concurs with the presence of O. m<strong>in</strong>uta<br />
chromosomes <strong>in</strong> the plants. S<strong>in</strong>ce the probes were highly specific<br />
and dispersed <strong>in</strong> the O. m<strong>in</strong>uta genome (Aswid<strong>in</strong>noor et<br />
al 1995), it can be <strong>in</strong>ferred that the B 2 S12 plant (2n = 24) has<br />
only O. sativa chromosomes. Any recomb<strong>in</strong>ation that may have<br />
occurred would <strong>in</strong>volve DNA not conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g sequences homologous<br />
to pOm4 or pOmPB10.<br />
References<br />
Amante-Bordeos AD, Sitch LA, Nelson RJ, Dalmacia R, Oliva NV,<br />
Aswid<strong>in</strong>noor H, Leung H. 1992. Transfer of resistance to bacterial<br />
blight and blast from the tetraploid wild rice Oryza<br />
m<strong>in</strong>uta to cultivated rice, Oryza sativa. Theor. Appl. Genet.<br />
84:345-354.<br />
Aswid<strong>in</strong>noor H, Nelson RJ, Dallas JF, Mc<strong>in</strong>tyre CL, Leung H,<br />
Gustafson JP. 1991. Clon<strong>in</strong>g and characterization of repetitive<br />
DNA sequences from genomes of Oryza m<strong>in</strong>uta and Oryza<br />
australiensis. Genome 34:790-798.<br />
Aswid<strong>in</strong>noor H, Nelson RJ, Gustafson JP. 1995. Genome-specific<br />
repetitive DNA probes detect <strong>in</strong>trogression of Oryza m<strong>in</strong>uta<br />
genome <strong>in</strong>to cultivated rice, Oryza sativa. Asia Pacific J. Mol.<br />
Biol. Biotechnol. 3:215-223.<br />
Doyle JJ, Doyle JL. 1990. Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue.<br />
Focus 12:1315.<br />
B 2<br />
S14<br />
pOm4 PCR products<br />
B 2<br />
S45<br />
pOmPB10 PCR<br />
Fig. 1. Dot blots of DNA samples hybridized to probe pOmPB10—<br />
parent, hybrid, and backcross progenies are <strong>in</strong>dicated. Note: No<br />
hybridization with O. sativa and B 2 S12 plant.<br />
Jena KK, Khush GS. 1989. Monosomic alien addition l<strong>in</strong>es of rice:<br />
production, morphology, cytology, and breed<strong>in</strong>g behavior.<br />
Genome 32:449-455.<br />
Mariam AL, Zakri AH, Mahani MC, Normah MN. 1996. Interspecific<br />
hybridization of cultivated rice Oryza sativa with the<br />
wild rice O. m<strong>in</strong>uta Presl. Theor. Appl. Genet. 93:664-671.<br />
Sitch LA. 1990. Incompatibility barriers operat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> crosses of Oryza<br />
sativa with related species and genera. In: Gustafson JP, editor.<br />
Genetic manipulation and plant improvement. II. New York<br />
(USA): Plenum Press. p 77-93.<br />
Notes<br />
Genetic variation for perenniality <strong>in</strong> O. sativa/<br />
O. rufipogon derivatives<br />
E.J. Sacks, K.M. McNally, L. Liu, R. Lafitte, and T. Sta. Cruz<br />
Authors’ addresses: S.C. Tong, M.M. Clyde, K. Narimah, School of<br />
Environmental and Natural Resource Sciences; Z. Zamrod,<br />
School of Biosciences and Biotechnology, Faculty of Science<br />
and Technology, 43600 Bangi, Selangor; A.L. Mariam, School<br />
of Science and Technology, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Locked<br />
Bag 2073, 88999 Kota K<strong>in</strong>abalu, Sabah, Malaysia.<br />
Introgression of perenniality genes from Oryza rufipogon to O. sativa would help upland rice farmers reduce soil erosion from<br />
their fields. Parental upland cultivars and 51 O. sativa/O. rufipogon F 1<br />
comb<strong>in</strong>ations were evaluated for 12 mo <strong>in</strong> an upland<br />
field. None of the 14 parental upland cultivars survived the experiments, <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g that they were not highly perennial. In<br />
contrast, 95 <strong>in</strong>terspecific progenies (19%) survived, <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g that perenniality genes from O. rufipogon were expressed <strong>in</strong><br />
some of the hybrids. The choice of O. rufipogon as parental material had a large and highly significant effect on the survival rate<br />
of the <strong>in</strong>terspecific progenies. Phenotypic selection for perenniality should be done more than a year after plant<strong>in</strong>g. The<br />
percentage of surviv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dividuals <strong>in</strong> F 1<br />
families at 12 mo was moderately and significantly correlated with the vigor of the O.<br />
rufipogon parent at 20 mo posttransplant<strong>in</strong>g but not with parental vigor at 9 mo. These observations were consistent with a<br />
Genetic diversity, evolution, and alien <strong>in</strong>trogression 123
strong and significant correlation between the percentages of surviv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dividuals with<strong>in</strong> O. rufipogon accessions at 15 mo with<br />
data taken at 21 mo. Moreover, the percentage of surviv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dividuals with<strong>in</strong> O. rufipogon accessions at 9 mo was not<br />
significantly correlated with percent survival at 15 mo or 21 mo, <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g that early selection for perenniality is not efficient.<br />
Selectable genetic variation for perenniality has been found <strong>in</strong> O. rufipogon and its progenies with O. sativa. Comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />
agronomically desirable traits with perenniality should be feasible but will be time-<strong>in</strong>tensive.<br />
To foster susta<strong>in</strong>able land use, mitigate soil erosion, and protect<br />
watersheds, we are develop<strong>in</strong>g perennial rice for the upland<br />
ecosystem. In Southeast Asia, upland rice is often grown<br />
on hilly fields, provid<strong>in</strong>g food security via low but stable yields<br />
(about 1 t ha –1 ) with few or no purchased <strong>in</strong>puts. The traditional<br />
shift<strong>in</strong>g cultivation system for upland rice has long rotations<br />
and is relatively susta<strong>in</strong>able. Recently, there has been a<br />
trend toward less susta<strong>in</strong>able shorter rotations and more <strong>in</strong>tensive<br />
use of marg<strong>in</strong>al lands. Perennial rice could be a useful<br />
tool for enabl<strong>in</strong>g farmers to produce food susta<strong>in</strong>ably while<br />
us<strong>in</strong>g their land more <strong>in</strong>tensively.<br />
Oryza rufipogon is the undomesticated progenitor species<br />
of cultivated Asian rice, O. sativa (Khush 1997). Upland<br />
rice cultivars are annual or weakly perennial at best. We have<br />
previously identified accessions of O. rufipogon that segregate<br />
for perenniality and drought tolerance (<strong>IRRI</strong> 1998). Thus,<br />
O. rufipogon may be a useful source of genes for develop<strong>in</strong>g<br />
perennial cultivated rice.<br />
Materials and methods<br />
From six accessions of O. rufipogon observed <strong>in</strong> the earlier<br />
study (<strong>IRRI</strong> 1998), 12 <strong>in</strong>dividuals were selected and crossed<br />
with upland rice cultivars to produce F 1 seed (Table 1). Crossed<br />
to each O. rufipogon genotype were one or more of 14 upland<br />
rice cultivars (Table 1).<br />
In 1998-99, an experiment was conducted to evaluate<br />
the perenniality and drought tolerance of 51 O. sativa/O.<br />
rufipogon F 1 comb<strong>in</strong>ations. In an upland field at <strong>IRRI</strong>, 501 F 1<br />
<strong>in</strong>dividuals were evaluated. Two rows of seedl<strong>in</strong>gs spaced on<br />
0.5-m centers were planted <strong>in</strong> each of 10 concrete-l<strong>in</strong>ed beds.<br />
Beds were 1.2 m wide by 15.9 m long, with 0.8 m between<br />
beds. All plants from a cross were placed <strong>in</strong> a s<strong>in</strong>gle observational<br />
plot.<br />
From plant<strong>in</strong>g through mid-March 1999, supplemental<br />
spr<strong>in</strong>kler irrigation was provided as needed. To evaluate<br />
drought tolerance, no supplemental irrigation was provided<br />
from 15 March 1999 (dur<strong>in</strong>g the dry season) until the end of<br />
the experiment. Because of above-average ra<strong>in</strong>fall for March,<br />
April, and May, entries were exposed to only a modest drought<br />
stress. On 30 June 1999, entries were scored for survival and<br />
survivors were rated for vigor (on a 1 to 9 scale, where 1 is<br />
highest). The effects on F 1 survival of the O. sativa parent, O.<br />
rufipogon parent, and their <strong>in</strong>teraction were assessed us<strong>in</strong>g SAS<br />
procedures CATMOD and FREQ (SAS 1990).<br />
Results and discussion<br />
By the end of the experiment, none of the cultivar controls had<br />
survived, <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g that the O. sativa parents were not highly<br />
perennial. For the F 1 s, 95 plants (19%) survived, <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g<br />
that genes for perenniality from O. rufipogon were expressed<br />
<strong>in</strong> some F 1 s.<br />
L<strong>in</strong>ear model analysis by SAS procedure CATMOD did<br />
not detect significant <strong>in</strong>teractions between the O. sativa and<br />
O. rufipogon parents, or a significant ma<strong>in</strong> effect of the O.<br />
sativa parent. Alhough the O. sativa parent and parental comb<strong>in</strong>ation<br />
did not have a detectable effect on survival, these data<br />
should be <strong>in</strong>terpreted cautiously <strong>in</strong> the light of the <strong>in</strong>complete<br />
cross<strong>in</strong>g design. The effect of the O. rufipogon parent was<br />
highly significant (P
Table 1. Number of O. sativa/O. rufipogon F 1 plants observed and percentage that survived after 1 year of cultivation and 2.5 months of<br />
moderate drought stress.<br />
O. rufipogon parents<br />
O. sativa parents Probability a<br />
106138-18 106138-4 106138-7 106340-2 106144-18 106340-1 105832-1 106144-2 106133-9<br />
Azucena – – 4 – – 12 5 – 2 0.233<br />
25% 8% 0% 0%<br />
Basmati 370 5 9 – – 14 10 8 – – 0.000<br />
40% 78% 21% 0% 0%<br />
Cuiabana – – 12 – – 10 12 10 10 0.085<br />
33% 10% 25% 0% 0%<br />
IR55423-01 1 10 – 13 12 – – – – 0.018<br />
100% 30% 8% 0%<br />
IR60080-46A – – 14 – – 12 12 3 10 0.568<br />
7% 0% 17% 0% 0%<br />
IR63371-38 – – – – – 3 – – – na<br />
0%<br />
IR63380-08 – – – – – 10 – – – na<br />
10%<br />
IR65907-216-1-B 4 – – 14 – – – – – 0.011<br />
100% 21%<br />
IR68704-145-1-1-B – 10 – 14 – – – – – 0.000<br />
90% 7%<br />
IRAT104 – – 12 – – 2 – – – 0.091<br />
58% 0%<br />
IRAT212 – – 12 – – 10 12 13 10 0.011<br />
58% 10% 17% 15% 0%<br />
IRAT216 – – 12 – – – – – – na<br />
0%<br />
Vandana – – 12 – – 12 12 13 10 0.000<br />
17% 0% 8% 0%<br />
WAB56-50 – – 14 – – 12 12 3 12 0.055<br />
21% 33% 0% 0% 0%<br />
Prob. b 0.250 0.017 0.000 0.591 0.140 0.449 0.229 0.853 na<br />
Summary by O. rufipogon<br />
Total 10 29 92 41 26 93 73 42 54<br />
Percent survived 70 66 35 12 12 11 10 7 0<br />
Mean vigor of progenies 3.4 3.8 6.0 5.4 6.3 4.2 5.6 4.7 na<br />
Standard deviation<br />
for vigor 2.5 2.1 2.3 4.5 2.1 1.5 2.6 2.3 na<br />
9-mo vigor of parent c 3 3 1 – 7 1 5 3 5<br />
20-mo vigor of parent c 1 3 5 – 5 7 10 5 10<br />
a Probability based on Fisher’s Exact Test for H 0 : no differences among O. rufipogon parents with<strong>in</strong> each O. sativa parent. b Probability based on Fisher’s Exact Test for H 0 : no<br />
differences among O. sativa parents with<strong>in</strong> each O. rufipogon parent. c Vigor <strong>in</strong> a previous greenhouse experiment at 9 and 20 mo after transplant<strong>in</strong>g; 10 = dead; na = not<br />
applicable.<br />
the earlier study on O. rufipogon accessions (<strong>IRRI</strong> 1998).<br />
With<strong>in</strong> O. rufipogon accessions, a strong and significant correlation<br />
was observed between the percentage of surviv<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>in</strong>dividuals at 15 mo with survival at 21 mo (r = 0.81). However,<br />
the percentage of surviv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dividuals with<strong>in</strong> O.<br />
rufipogon accessions at 9 mo was not significantly correlated<br />
with percent survival at 15 or 21 mo. Thus, both studies <strong>in</strong>dicate<br />
that early selection for perenniality is not efficient. Phenotypic<br />
selection for perenniality should not be done earlier<br />
than 1 y after plant<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
Recomb<strong>in</strong>ation and selection should allow the identification<br />
of progenies that are perennial and agronomically desirable.<br />
While the prospects for develop<strong>in</strong>g perennial cultivated<br />
rice are good, much time will need to be <strong>in</strong>vested <strong>in</strong> this<br />
endeavor.<br />
References<br />
<strong>IRRI</strong> (<strong>International</strong> <strong>Rice</strong> Research Institute). 1998. Program report<br />
for 1997. Manila (Philipp<strong>in</strong>es): <strong>IRRI</strong>. 175 p.<br />
Khush GS. 1997. Orig<strong>in</strong>, dispersal, cultivation and variation of rice.<br />
Plant Mol. Biol. 35:25-34.<br />
SAS Institute Inc. 1990. SAS/STAT user’s guide, version 6. 4th ed.<br />
Cary, N.C. (USA): SAS Institute.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ address: Plant Breed<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>Genetics</strong>, and Biochemistry Division,<br />
<strong>International</strong> <strong>Rice</strong> Research Institute, DAPO Box 7777,<br />
Manila, Philipp<strong>in</strong>es.<br />
Genetic diversity, evolution, and alien <strong>in</strong>trogression 125
Genetic population structures of Oryza glumaepatula<br />
and O. grandiglumis distributed <strong>in</strong> the Amazon flood area<br />
M. Akimoto and H. Morishima<br />
Two wild rice species, Oryza glumaepatula (AA, 2n = 24) and O. grandiglumis (CCDD, 2n = 48), often grow sympatrically <strong>in</strong> the<br />
Amazon Bas<strong>in</strong>. The two species have different traits for adapt<strong>in</strong>g to heavy flood stress. O. glumaepatula can form float<strong>in</strong>g<br />
meadows and move down the river, while O. grandiglumis is immovable but has prom<strong>in</strong>ent <strong>in</strong>ternode elongation ability. Population<br />
genetic structures of O. glumaepatula and O. grandiglumis were analyzed based on variation at 22 loci <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g 13<br />
enzymes <strong>in</strong> natural populations. The fixation <strong>in</strong>dex over polymorphic loci was 0.956 for O. glumaepatula and 0.344 for O.<br />
grandiglumis, <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g that the former is predom<strong>in</strong>antly self<strong>in</strong>g and the latter is partially outcross<strong>in</strong>g. Gene diversity calculated<br />
for each population of O. glumaepatula tended to <strong>in</strong>crease when go<strong>in</strong>g from the upper to the lower bas<strong>in</strong>. The migration ability<br />
of this species produces a gene flow that most probably proceeds <strong>in</strong> a one-way direction from the upper to the lower bas<strong>in</strong>. In<br />
O. grandiglumis, gene flow might have occurred mostly by means of pollen dispersion. S<strong>in</strong>ce pollen flow is nondirectional, no<br />
gradient variation of gene diversity observed <strong>in</strong> O. glumaepatula was found <strong>in</strong> O. grandiglumis. Different life-history traits might<br />
have led to the differentiation of the population structures of the two Amazonian wild rice species.<br />
Life-history traits of plants strongly affect the genetic structure<br />
of their natural populations. Population structures may<br />
differ even among closely related species if they developed<br />
different life-history traits.<br />
Two wild rice species, Oryza glumaepatula (2n = 24)<br />
and O. grandiglumis (2n = 48), often exist sympatrically <strong>in</strong><br />
the Amazon Bas<strong>in</strong>. However, they seem to have different lifehistory<br />
traits and differ <strong>in</strong> adaptation to the flood-area environments:<br />
O. glumaepatula can quickly elongate its <strong>in</strong>ternodes<br />
<strong>in</strong> response to the rapid <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> river water. At a<br />
certa<strong>in</strong> growth stage, its culms break and float on the water<br />
surface. With secondary tillers and adventitious roots, it constructs<br />
float<strong>in</strong>g meadows and drifts about the river, mostly from<br />
the upper to the lower bas<strong>in</strong>. O. grandiglumis can also elongate<br />
its <strong>in</strong>ternodes to cope with the rapid <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> river water,<br />
but it never forms float<strong>in</strong>g meadows as does O.<br />
glumaepatula. Instead, it has the ability to lift its panicles above<br />
water as deep as 10 m.<br />
We exam<strong>in</strong>ed the allozyme variability for the natural<br />
populations of O. glumaepatula and O. grandiglumis and<br />
looked at the factors affect<strong>in</strong>g the genetic structures of Amazonian<br />
wild rice populations.<br />
Materials and methods<br />
Allozyme variability was analyzed for 22 loci <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g 13<br />
enzymes us<strong>in</strong>g 15 populations each for O. glumaepatula and<br />
O. grandiglumis. These populations were located <strong>in</strong> the upper<br />
region from Manaus, a city <strong>in</strong> the middle reaches of the Amazon<br />
(Fig. 1). We grew 15 plants per population and young leaves<br />
were used for the allozyme assay. Statistical parameters such<br />
as fixation <strong>in</strong>dex and Nei’s gene diversity were calculated based<br />
on polymorphic loci.<br />
Results and discussion<br />
Among the loci analyzed, 12 loci of 9 enzymes and 5 loci of 4<br />
enzymes were polymorphic as well as detectable for heterozygotes<br />
of O. glumaepatula and O. grandiglumis, respectively.<br />
For O. glumaepatula, observed heterozygosity (Ho) and expected<br />
heterozygosity (He) were 0.010 and 0.223, respectively,<br />
and its fixation <strong>in</strong>dex (Fis) was 0.956, <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g that Amazonian<br />
O. glumaepatula is predom<strong>in</strong>antly self-poll<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g. Ho<br />
and He for O. grandiglumis were 0.214 and 0.326, respectively,<br />
and its Fis was significantly different from zero (Fis =<br />
0.344, P>0.10). Amazonian O. grandiglumis is considered to<br />
be partially outcross<strong>in</strong>g because we found many heterozygotes<br />
<strong>in</strong> the populations.<br />
The coefficients of gene differentiation (Gst) were 0.618<br />
for O. glumaepatula and 0.280 for O. grandiglumis (Table 1).<br />
These <strong>in</strong>dicated that allele frequency at a locus tended to be<br />
differentiated among geographically isolated populations <strong>in</strong><br />
both species, while the degree was larger <strong>in</strong> O. glumaepatula.<br />
To exam<strong>in</strong>e the association between population location and<br />
variability of genes, gene diversity was regressed aga<strong>in</strong>st the<br />
distance from Manaus for each population (Fig. 2). In O.<br />
glumaepatula, gene diversity was found to <strong>in</strong>crease as the populations<br />
got farther from Manaus. The ability of O. glumaepatula<br />
to float down the river resulted <strong>in</strong> a one-directional gene flow<br />
proceed<strong>in</strong>g from the upper to the lower bas<strong>in</strong>, with the genes<br />
accumulat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the lower bas<strong>in</strong>. In O. grandiglumis, we could<br />
not expla<strong>in</strong> the variation pattern <strong>in</strong> gene diversity <strong>in</strong> relation to<br />
the location of populations. The regression slope was not significantly<br />
different from zero (P>0.10). Most probably, gene<br />
flow by means of pollen dispersion has occurred among partially<br />
outcross<strong>in</strong>g populations of O. grandiglumis. Because<br />
pollen flow is nondirectional, gradient variation of gene diversity<br />
as observed <strong>in</strong> O. glumaepatula was not found <strong>in</strong> O.<br />
grandiglumis.<br />
126 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
O. glumaepatula<br />
O. grandiglumis<br />
Manaus<br />
100 km<br />
Fig. 1.Geographic distribution<br />
of the natural populations<br />
of O. glumaepatula and<br />
O. grandiglumis.<br />
Gene diversity<br />
0.3<br />
0.2<br />
O. glumaepatula<br />
O. grandiglumis<br />
Table 1. Allozyme diversity found <strong>in</strong> O. glumaepatula and O.<br />
grandiglumis: observed heterozygosity (Ho), expected heterozygosity<br />
(He), fixation <strong>in</strong>dex (Fis), and coefficient of gene differentiation<br />
(Gst). Parameters were calculated us<strong>in</strong>g data from 12 and 5 polymorphic<br />
loci for O. glumaepatula and O. grandiglumis, respectively.<br />
Species Populations Ho He Fis Gst<br />
O. glumaepatula 15 0.010 0.223 0.956 0.618<br />
O. grandiglumis 15 0.214 0.326 0.344 0.280<br />
0.1<br />
O. glumaepatula and O. grandiglumis have different lifehistory<br />
traits and different modes of gene flow among populations.<br />
This might have led to the differentiation of the population<br />
structures of the two species <strong>in</strong> the Amazon Bas<strong>in</strong>.<br />
0.0<br />
0 2 4 6 8<br />
Distance from Manaus (´100 km)<br />
Fig. 2.Gene diversity as a function of geographic distance of populations<br />
from Manaus. Solid and dashed l<strong>in</strong>es denote regression<br />
l<strong>in</strong>es for O. glumaepatula and O. grandiglumis, respectively.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ addresses: M. Akimoto, Obihiro University of Agriculture<br />
and Veter<strong>in</strong>ary Medic<strong>in</strong>e, Obihiro 080-8555; H. Morishima,<br />
National Institute of <strong>Genetics</strong>, Mishima 411-8580, Japan.<br />
Genetic diversity, evolution, and alien <strong>in</strong>trogression 127
Oryza glumaepatula Steud. <strong>in</strong>trogression l<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong> rice:<br />
identification of genes for reproductive barriers<br />
Sobrizal, Y. Matsuzaki, K. Ikeda, P.L. Sanchez, K. Doi, H. Yasui, E.R. Angeles, G.S. Khush, and A. Yoshimura<br />
To broaden rice genetic resources, we developed <strong>in</strong>trogression l<strong>in</strong>es carry<strong>in</strong>g Oryza glumaepatula (IRGC Acc. 105668) and O.<br />
sativa cv. Taichung 65 cytoplasm. These l<strong>in</strong>es conta<strong>in</strong> overlapped O. glumaepatula chromosomal segments that covered most<br />
parts of the O. glumaepatula genome <strong>in</strong> the Taichung 65 genetic background. Introgression l<strong>in</strong>es were developed through<br />
repeated backcross<strong>in</strong>g with Taichung 65 as a recurrent parent. Candidate l<strong>in</strong>es were selected us<strong>in</strong>g 106 restriction fragment<br />
length polymorphism (RFLP) markers well distributed on 12 rice chromosomes. Dur<strong>in</strong>g the process of development, two<br />
reproductive barriers, hybrid weakness and pollen semisterility, were observed <strong>in</strong> the backcross populations. Hybrid weakness<br />
was attributed to the <strong>in</strong>teraction between O. glumaepatula cytoplasm and the nuclear genome of Taichung 65. The dom<strong>in</strong>ant<br />
allele of O. glumaepatula restored the hybrid weakness of the plants hav<strong>in</strong>g O. glumaepatula cytoplasm. The gene responsible<br />
for hybrid weakness restoration was designated Rhw (hybrid weakness restoration for O. glumaepatula cytoplasm) and was<br />
closely l<strong>in</strong>ked to RFLP marker C1115 on chromosome 8. Two F 1<br />
pollen semisterility genes, S22(t) and S23(t), were closely<br />
l<strong>in</strong>ked to RFLP markers S910 on chromosome 2 and C1340 on chromosome 7, respectively. S<strong>in</strong>ce the O. glumaepatula<br />
homozygous alleles were not observed at the S910 locus <strong>in</strong> the BC 4<br />
F 2<br />
population, it seemed that the pollen hav<strong>in</strong>g the O.<br />
glumaepatula allele at the S22(t) locus aborted.<br />
Oryza glumaepatula, a diploid (AA genome) wild species, is<br />
distributed <strong>in</strong> Central and South America and the Caribbean<br />
(Vaughan 1989). This species is adapted to flooded conditions<br />
and grows widely <strong>in</strong> the Amazon Bas<strong>in</strong>, Brazil (Akimoto et al<br />
1998). The F 1 hybrids between O. sativa and O. glumaepatula<br />
generally showed high pollen sterility (H<strong>in</strong>ata and Oka 1962,<br />
Chu et al 1969). Molecular markers have enabled us to locate<br />
useful genes or quantitative trait loci (QTLs). Us<strong>in</strong>g markeraided<br />
selection, we developed a series of O. glumaepatula <strong>in</strong>trogression<br />
l<strong>in</strong>es with O. sativa L. cv. Taichung 65 and O.<br />
glumaepatula cytoplasm <strong>in</strong> the genetic background of Taichung<br />
65. Such <strong>in</strong>trogression l<strong>in</strong>es would be important to broaden<br />
rice genetic resources as well as to analyze the genetics of<br />
traits specific to O. glumaepatula and to exploit this species <strong>in</strong><br />
rice breed<strong>in</strong>g. We also analyzed the two reproductive barriers<br />
(hybrid weakness and pollen sterility) encountered dur<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
development of <strong>in</strong>trogression l<strong>in</strong>es.<br />
Materials and methods<br />
In develop<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>trogression l<strong>in</strong>es, F 1 plants obta<strong>in</strong>ed through<br />
reciprocal crosses between O. glumaepatula (IRGC Acc.<br />
105668) and Taichung 65 served as female parents and were<br />
cont<strong>in</strong>uously backcrossed with Taichung 65 to produce the<br />
BC 4 F 1 populations. To select plants hav<strong>in</strong>g the desired genotypes,<br />
a whole-genome survey was conducted <strong>in</strong> the BC 3 F 1<br />
generation by us<strong>in</strong>g 106 restriction fragment length polymorphism<br />
markers scattered on 12 chromosomes. Selections <strong>in</strong><br />
the BC 4 F 1 generation were made on the basis of the observation<br />
of genotypes of the target regions only. Then, the selected<br />
BC 4 F 1 plants were self-poll<strong>in</strong>ated to obta<strong>in</strong> BC 4 F 2 plants as<br />
candidates for fixed l<strong>in</strong>es.<br />
To analyze hybrid weakness, a heterozygous plant hav<strong>in</strong>g<br />
O. glumaepatula cytoplasm (BC 4 F 1 17-27) was crossed<br />
with Taichung 65. The BC 5 F 1 population was used as a mapp<strong>in</strong>g<br />
population. Two genes for hybrid sterility were analyzed<br />
us<strong>in</strong>g BC 5 F 1 and BC 4 F 2 populations.<br />
Results and discussion<br />
Development of <strong>in</strong>trogression l<strong>in</strong>es<br />
In BC 3 F 1 , 103 plants hav<strong>in</strong>g O. glumaepatula cytoplasm and<br />
83 plants hav<strong>in</strong>g Taichung 65 cytoplasm were genotyped by<br />
106 RFLP markers to select plants conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the desired genotypes.<br />
Each set of 27 selected plants with O. glumaepatula<br />
cytoplasm and 36 plants with Taichung 65 cytoplasm, provid<strong>in</strong>g<br />
almost complete coverage of the O. glumaepatula genome,<br />
was further backcrossed to Taichung 65. In the BC 4 F 1 , 63 plants<br />
hav<strong>in</strong>g O. glumaepatula cytoplasm and 84 plants hav<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Taichung 65 cytoplasm were selected from 167 and 184 plants,<br />
respectively, based on the genotype of the target region. Most<br />
parts of the O. glumaepatula genome were covered, except<br />
for some regions of chromosomes 1, 6, 10, and 12.<br />
Hybrid weakness<br />
The BC 4 F 1 with O. glumaepatula cytoplasm showed segregation<br />
for hybrid weakness. Hybrid weakness was characterized<br />
by poor growth stature and completely sterile panicles. But no<br />
weak plant was observed <strong>in</strong> the BC 4 F 1 generation with Taichung<br />
65 cytoplasm. In addition, the whole-genome genotyp<strong>in</strong>g us<strong>in</strong>g<br />
106 RFLP markers revealed that all of the normal plants<br />
segregated <strong>in</strong> the BC 3 F 1 with O. glumaepatula cytoplasm carried<br />
alleles of O. glumaepatula at the locus of C1115 on chromosome<br />
8. This tendency was not observed <strong>in</strong> the BC 3 F 1 with<br />
Taichung 65 cytoplasm.<br />
When a BC 4 F 1 plant with O. glumaepatula cytoplasm—<br />
which conta<strong>in</strong>ed the chromosome segment of O. glumaepatula<br />
around the region of C1115 and which showed normal growth<br />
128 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
stature—was crossed with Taichung 65, 28 normal and 29 weak<br />
plants segregated <strong>in</strong> the BC 5 F 1 . Monogenic segregation (1:1)<br />
suggests that hybrid weakness was governed by one gene. Tight<br />
l<strong>in</strong>kage was found between the weakness and C1115 on chromosome<br />
8 (Fig. 1). Breed<strong>in</strong>g behavior <strong>in</strong> the development of<br />
two sets of O. glumaepatula <strong>in</strong>trogression l<strong>in</strong>es as well as l<strong>in</strong>kage<br />
analysis demonstrated that the weakness was due to the<br />
<strong>in</strong>teraction of O. glumaepatula cytoplasm and the Taichung<br />
8S<br />
8L<br />
2.5 cM<br />
Rhw<br />
C1115<br />
C347<br />
Fig. 1. L<strong>in</strong>kage map of chromosome 8 show<strong>in</strong>g the location<br />
of Rhw. Framework map on the left is taken from<br />
Harushima et al (1998).<br />
65 nuclear genome, which resides around the locus of C1115.<br />
The allele of O. glumaepatula is dom<strong>in</strong>ant and can restore<br />
hybrid weakness of the plants hav<strong>in</strong>g O. glumaepatula cytoplasm.<br />
This gene was designated Rhw (hybrid weakness restoration<br />
for O. glumaepatula cytoplasm).<br />
Hybrid sterility<br />
Two loci for hybrid sterility were identified <strong>in</strong> these backcross<br />
populations. In the BC 4 F 2 population derived from BC 4 F 1 265<br />
with Taichung 65 cytoplasm, the plants hav<strong>in</strong>g normal and<br />
semisterile pollens segregated <strong>in</strong> a 1:1 ratio (Fig. 2A). The<br />
gene controll<strong>in</strong>g pollen semisterility was tightly l<strong>in</strong>ked with<br />
RFLP markers S910, R2510, and R2460 on the short arm of<br />
chromosome 2 (Fig. 2B). S<strong>in</strong>ce no report is available on a<br />
hybrid sterility gene on chromosome 2, this gene was designated<br />
S22(t). The plant carry<strong>in</strong>g heterozygous alleles at the<br />
S22(t) locus showed 50% pollen sterility. Furthermore, no plant<br />
with O. glumaepatula homozygous alleles at S910 was observed<br />
<strong>in</strong> this BC 4 F 2 population (Table 1), suggest<strong>in</strong>g that the<br />
pollens carry<strong>in</strong>g the O. glumaepatula allele were aborted.<br />
The monogenic segregation (1:1) show<strong>in</strong>g normal and<br />
semisterile pollens was also observed <strong>in</strong> the BC 5 F 1 population<br />
derived from backcross<strong>in</strong>g of BC 4 F 1 112 with Taichung 65<br />
(Fig. 3A). Us<strong>in</strong>g this BC 5 F 1 population, the gene controll<strong>in</strong>g<br />
this pollen semisterility was mapped on the long arm of chromosome<br />
7 and tightly l<strong>in</strong>ked with C1340 (Fig. 3B). Doi et al<br />
(1999) reported that the F 1 pollen semisterility gene S21, found<br />
<strong>in</strong> the backcross progenies of O. sativa and O. glaberrima,<br />
was also tightly l<strong>in</strong>ked with RFLP marker C1340 on chromosome<br />
7. There is a high possibility that S21 is allelic to the<br />
hybrid sterility gene of O. glumaepatula. The gene is tentatively<br />
designated S23(t).<br />
No. of plants<br />
40<br />
30<br />
A<br />
N = 68<br />
32<br />
2S<br />
B<br />
C1357<br />
36<br />
20<br />
1.5 cM<br />
10<br />
0<br />
0 20 40 60 80 100<br />
Pollen fertility (%)<br />
2L<br />
S22(t)<br />
R2510<br />
S910<br />
R2460<br />
Fig. 2. Frequency distribution<br />
of pollen fertility <strong>in</strong><br />
the BC 4 F 2 population derived<br />
from BC 4 F 1 265 (A)<br />
and l<strong>in</strong>kage map of chromosome<br />
2 show<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
location of S22(t) (B).<br />
No. of plants<br />
50 A<br />
50<br />
40<br />
N = 104<br />
30<br />
54<br />
7S<br />
B<br />
cM<br />
1.0<br />
R1789<br />
S23(t)<br />
C1340<br />
20<br />
10<br />
0<br />
0 20 40 60 80 100<br />
Pollen fertility (%)<br />
7L<br />
1.9<br />
C213<br />
Fig. 3. Frequency distribution<br />
of pollen fertility <strong>in</strong> the BC 5 F 1<br />
population derived from BC 4 F 1<br />
112 (A) and l<strong>in</strong>kage map of<br />
chromosome 7 show<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
location of S23(t) (B).<br />
Genetic diversity, evolution, and alien <strong>in</strong>trogression 129
Table 1. Inheritance of Taichung 65 and O. glumaepatula<br />
alleles at marker S910 <strong>in</strong> BC 4 F 2 population.<br />
Pollen fertility<br />
Allele a<br />
TT TG GG<br />
Normal 32 0 0<br />
Semisterile 0 36 0<br />
a TT, TG, and GG are Taichung 65 homozygous and heterozygous alleles<br />
and O. glumaepatula homozygous alleles, respectively.<br />
This study revealed the characteristics and chromosomal<br />
location of three genes controll<strong>in</strong>g reproductive barriers <strong>in</strong><br />
hybrids of O. glumaepatula and O. sativa. Information about<br />
the nature of reproductive barriers would enable precise use<br />
of the O. glumaepatula trait <strong>in</strong> improv<strong>in</strong>g rice varieties.<br />
Chu YE, Morishima H, Oka HI. 1969. Reproductive barriers distributed<br />
<strong>in</strong> cultivated rice species and their wild relatives. Jpn.<br />
J. Genet. 44:207-223.<br />
Doi K, Taguchi K, Yoshimura A. 1999. RFLP mapp<strong>in</strong>g of S20 and<br />
S21 for F 1 pollen semi-sterility found <strong>in</strong> backcross progeny<br />
of Oryza sativa and O. glaberrima. <strong>Rice</strong> Genet. Newsl. 16:65-<br />
67.<br />
Harushima H, Yano M, Shomura A, Sato M, Shimano T, Kuboki Y,<br />
Yamamoto T, L<strong>in</strong> SY, Antonio BA, Parco A, Kajiya H, Huang<br />
N, Yamamoto K, Nagamura Y, Kurata N, Khush GS, Sasaki<br />
T. 1998. A high-density rice genetic l<strong>in</strong>kage map with 2275<br />
markers us<strong>in</strong>g a s<strong>in</strong>gle F 2 population. <strong>Genetics</strong> 148: 479-494.<br />
H<strong>in</strong>ata K, Oka HI. 1962. A survey of hybrid sterility relationships <strong>in</strong><br />
the Asian forms of Oryza perennis and Oryza sativa. Jpn. J.<br />
Genet. 37:314-328.<br />
Vaughan D. 1989. The genus Oryza L.: current status of taxonomy.<br />
<strong>IRRI</strong> Research Paper Series No. 138. Los Baños (Philipp<strong>in</strong>es):<br />
<strong>International</strong> <strong>Rice</strong> Research Institute<br />
References<br />
Akimoto M, Shimamoto Y, Morishima H. 1998. Population genetic<br />
structure of wild rice Oryza glumaepatula distributed <strong>in</strong> the<br />
Amazon flood area <strong>in</strong>fluenced by its life-history traits. Mol.<br />
Ecol. 7:1371-1381.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ addresses: Sobrizal, Y. Matsuzaki, K. Ikeda, P.L. Sanchez,<br />
K. Doi, H. Yasui, and A. Yoshimura, Plant Breed<strong>in</strong>g Laboratory,<br />
Faculty of Agriculture, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 812-<br />
8581 Japan; E.R. Angeles and G.S. Khush, <strong>International</strong> <strong>Rice</strong><br />
Research Institute, Los Baños, Philipp<strong>in</strong>es.<br />
Advanced backcross analysis for transferr<strong>in</strong>g QTLs<br />
from O. rufipogon<br />
S.N. Ahn, K.H. Kang, J.P. Suh, S.J. Kwon, H.P. Moon, H.C. Choi, and S.R. McCouch<br />
Two improved rice cultivars (Milyang23 and Hwaseongbyeo) were crossed to Oryza rufipogon, and their F 1<br />
hybrids were backcrossed<br />
to two elite cultivars. The promis<strong>in</strong>g BC 1<br />
plants, selected for desirable phenotypic traits, were backcrossed to elite<br />
cultivars to produce BC 2<br />
plants. A total of 275 and 173 BC 2<br />
F 2<br />
families derived from the crosses of Milyang23 and Hwaseongbyeo,<br />
respectively, were evaluated <strong>in</strong> replicated yield trials <strong>in</strong> Suwon, Korea. Eight agronomic traits, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g yield and days to<br />
head<strong>in</strong>g, were evaluated. Transgressive segregants were observed for yield and other yield components. The BC 2<br />
F 2<br />
families<br />
were screened us<strong>in</strong>g RFLP and microsatellite markers. L<strong>in</strong>kage analysis was conducted us<strong>in</strong>g QGENE with a threshold value of<br />
0.01. Two QTLs associated with yield were identified on chromosomes 1 and 2 for the cross Milyang23/O. rufipogon. In<br />
addition, 26 QTLs associated with yield components were also identified. For the Hwaseongbyeo/O. rufipogon cross, 20 QTLs<br />
related to yield and yield components were identified. Our data suggested that <strong>in</strong>trogression from O. rufipogon could contribute<br />
positively to yield <strong>in</strong> elite cultivars.<br />
Genetic diversity is a prerequisite for <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g yield and for<br />
stabiliz<strong>in</strong>g production <strong>in</strong> the event of disease epidemics and<br />
fluctuat<strong>in</strong>g environmental conditions. Wild relatives of crop<br />
species have been given considerable attention <strong>in</strong> germplasm<br />
collection because much of the genetic variation to be used is<br />
conta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> the wild relatives. The wild relatives of crop species<br />
are phenotypically less desirable than modern varieties <strong>in</strong><br />
their overall appearance. These genetic resources have not been<br />
used extensively for enhanc<strong>in</strong>g the performance of modern<br />
cultivars, other than as a source of s<strong>in</strong>gle genes for disease and<br />
<strong>in</strong>sect resistance. Recent research has shown the potential of<br />
us<strong>in</strong>g wild species to improve cultivated crops for both yield<br />
and quality traits (Xiao et al 1998). Two well-saturated restriction<br />
fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) maps of rice<br />
are available and a microsatellite map provid<strong>in</strong>g genome-wide<br />
coverage of rice has been developed recently (Temnykh et al<br />
2001). These maps conta<strong>in</strong> closely l<strong>in</strong>ked, codom<strong>in</strong>ant loci<br />
that can be monitored for l<strong>in</strong>kage to genes controll<strong>in</strong>g virtually<br />
any trait important to crop plants. These maps, if used <strong>in</strong><br />
conjunction with traditional breed<strong>in</strong>g techniques, allow researchers<br />
to locate and selectively transfer genes condition<strong>in</strong>g<br />
biotic and abiotic stress tolerance and various agronomic traits.<br />
By target<strong>in</strong>g previously unused sources of genetic variation,<br />
molecular marker analysis offers an effective way to br<strong>in</strong>g<br />
130 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
valuable new genes <strong>in</strong>to the gene pool and simultaneously<br />
improve crop performance. This study began to determ<strong>in</strong>e the<br />
potential for us<strong>in</strong>g the wild relative, O. rufipogon, to improve<br />
quantitative traits of agronomic importance <strong>in</strong> elite Korean<br />
varieties Milyang23 and Hwaseongbyeo.<br />
Materials and methods<br />
O. rufipogon (IRGC 105491) was hybridized as the pollen<br />
parent to Milyang23 and Hwaseongbyeo. The F 1 plants were<br />
backcrossed twice to Milyang23 us<strong>in</strong>g Milyang23 as the pollen<br />
parent. The 21 best-look<strong>in</strong>g BC 1 plants out of 40 were<br />
selected and backcrossed a second time to Milyang23 to produce<br />
2,000 BC 2 plants. A subset of 275 BC 2 plants was selected<br />
and selfed to produce the BC 2 F 2 families. The 275 BC 2 F 2<br />
families along with the two parents were grown <strong>in</strong> a bird-netequipped<br />
field at the National Crop Experiment Station,<br />
Suweon, Korea. The field plant<strong>in</strong>g followed a completely randomized<br />
block design with three replications. For each family<br />
with<strong>in</strong> a replication, 30-d-old seedl<strong>in</strong>gs were transplanted to a<br />
two-row plot with 20 plants per row. Gra<strong>in</strong> yield per plant was<br />
obta<strong>in</strong>ed by averag<strong>in</strong>g the gra<strong>in</strong> harvest of the middle 20 plants<br />
<strong>in</strong> each plot. Evaluation of seven additional traits (days to head<strong>in</strong>g,<br />
culm length, panicle length, panicles per plant, spikelets<br />
per panicle, 1,000-gra<strong>in</strong> weight, and ripen<strong>in</strong>g ratio) followed<br />
the Standard evaluation system (RDA 1995). Two classes of<br />
markers were employed to assay DNA polymorphisms between<br />
the parents (Milyang23, O. rufipogon): RFLPs and<br />
microsatellites. Leaf tissues were harvested from bulks of at<br />
least 20 plants from each of the BC 2 F 2 families. Microsatellite<br />
markers show<strong>in</strong>g simple sequence repeat polymorphisms between<br />
the parents were used to assay the BC 2 F 2 families. The<br />
procedures for the analysis were as described <strong>in</strong> Panaud et al<br />
(1996). Statistical analyses were performed us<strong>in</strong>g QGENE<br />
(Nelson 1997) and Data Desk 4.0.<br />
Results and discussion<br />
Eighty out of 101 microsatellite markers (79%) detected polymorphism<br />
between the parents, Hwaseongbyeo and O.<br />
rufipogon. The higher polymorphism frequency by<br />
microsatellite markers seemed to demonstrate the greater resolution<br />
of this marker system.<br />
Figure 1 shows the frequency distribution of eight traits<br />
<strong>in</strong> the BC 2 F 2 families <strong>in</strong> the Hwaseongbyeo cross. O. rufipogon<br />
(characterized as tall, awned, late-matur<strong>in</strong>g, dormant, susceptible<br />
to shatter<strong>in</strong>g, and with a black hull) was among the lowest<br />
performers, be<strong>in</strong>g phenotypically <strong>in</strong>ferior to Hwaseongbyeo.<br />
Most of the BC 2 F 2 families yielded less than Hwaseongbyeo.<br />
The transgressive segregants were observed for all traits: 11%<br />
and 24% of the 173 BC 2 F 2 families outperformed Milyang23<br />
<strong>in</strong> gra<strong>in</strong> yield and spikelets per panicle, respectively. For the<br />
BC 2 F 2 families <strong>in</strong> the Milyang23 cross, 9% and 36% outperformed<br />
Milyang23 <strong>in</strong> gra<strong>in</strong> yield and spikelets per panicle,<br />
respectively (data not shown). In addition, 26 QTLs associated<br />
with yield components were also identified for the<br />
Milyang23/O. rufipogon cross. For the Hwaseongbyeo/O.<br />
rufipogon cross, 20 QTLs related to yield and yield components<br />
were identified. These results suggested that genes from<br />
O. rufipogon can improve an elite cultivar <strong>in</strong> yield and yield<br />
components.<br />
To detect the O. rufipogon chromosome segments <strong>in</strong> the<br />
Milyang23 genetic background of elite cultivars and demonstrate<br />
a significant correlation between their presence and enhanced<br />
gra<strong>in</strong> yield, QTL mapp<strong>in</strong>g was conducted on the BC 2 F 2<br />
data by regression of field performance on marker genotype<br />
us<strong>in</strong>g standard ANOVA procedures. One QTL affect<strong>in</strong>g gra<strong>in</strong><br />
yield <strong>in</strong> the Milyang23 cross was identified on chromosome 1<br />
(P
Hwaseongbyeo O. rufipogon Hwaseongbyeo O. rufipogon<br />
Frequency<br />
50<br />
40<br />
30<br />
20<br />
10<br />
0<br />
103 108 113 118 123 128 133<br />
Days to head<strong>in</strong>g<br />
50<br />
40<br />
30<br />
20<br />
10<br />
0<br />
75 85 95 105 115 125<br />
80 90 100 110 120<br />
Culm length (cm)<br />
Hwaseongbyeo O. rufipogon Hwaseongbyeo<br />
O. rufipogon<br />
60<br />
50<br />
20<br />
20<br />
10<br />
0 0<br />
20 21 22 23 24 25 26 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20<br />
40<br />
40<br />
30<br />
Panicle length (cm)<br />
Panicle number<br />
60<br />
40<br />
20<br />
0<br />
60<br />
70<br />
Fertility (%)<br />
Hwaseongbyeo<br />
O. rufipogon<br />
Hwaseongbyeo<br />
O. rufipogon<br />
40<br />
80 100 120 140<br />
30<br />
20<br />
10<br />
0<br />
60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95<br />
90 110 130<br />
Spikelets panicle –1<br />
Hwaseongbyeo<br />
O. rufipogon<br />
40<br />
30<br />
20<br />
10<br />
0<br />
16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 25<br />
1,000-gra<strong>in</strong> weight (g)<br />
O. rufipogon<br />
50<br />
40<br />
30<br />
20<br />
10<br />
0<br />
24<br />
Hwaseongbyeo<br />
4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0<br />
4.5 5.5 6.5 7.5 8.5<br />
Yield (t ha –1 )<br />
Fig. 1. Frequency distribution of<br />
eight traits <strong>in</strong> the BC 2 F 2 families<br />
from the O. sativa cv.<br />
Hwaseongbyeo/O. rufipogon cross.<br />
1<br />
RZ288<br />
RG458<br />
RG532<br />
RG811<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ addresses: S.N. Ahn, Department of Agronomy, Chungnam<br />
National University, Daejeon 305-764; K.H. Kang, J.P. Suh,<br />
S.J. Kwon, H.P. Moon, H.C. Choi, National Crop Experiment<br />
Station, RDA, Suwon 441-100, Korea; S.R. McCouch, Department<br />
of Plant Breed<strong>in</strong>g, 252 Emerson Hall, Cornell University,<br />
Ithaca, N.Y. 14853, USA.<br />
RM5<br />
Milyang23/O. rufipogon<br />
RZ776<br />
RM34<br />
Hwaseongbyeo/O. rufipogon<br />
RZ730<br />
RG331<br />
Fig. 2. A comparison of<br />
yield QTLs <strong>in</strong> RM5 region<br />
on chromosome 1 of<br />
rice.<br />
132 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
Wild-QTL-allele effect <strong>in</strong> the background<br />
of japonica Nipponbare and <strong>in</strong>dica (IR36) cultivars<br />
T. Ishii, N.S. Bautista, K. Shimadzutsu, N. Kobayashi, N. Uchida, and O. Kamijima<br />
To identify useful quantitative trait loci (QTL) alleles from wild rice relatives, an accession of wild rice Oryza rufipogon from<br />
Myanmar was crossed with one japonica (Nipponbare) and one <strong>in</strong>dica (IR36) cultivar. In the BC 2<br />
generation us<strong>in</strong>g O. sativa as<br />
the recurrent parent, 11 morphological characters (days to head<strong>in</strong>g, photosynthesis activity, culm and panicle length, number<br />
of tillers, yield, 100-seed weight, seed length and width, gra<strong>in</strong> length and width) were evaluated with the two populations,<br />
consist<strong>in</strong>g of approximately 200 plants each. S<strong>in</strong>gle-po<strong>in</strong>t QTL analysis was carried out with about 75 microsatellite markers<br />
almost cover<strong>in</strong>g the rice genome. A total of 55 and 51 QTLs were identified at a significance of P
polymerase (Toyobo, Japan). Amplification was carried out <strong>in</strong><br />
a thermal cycler MP (TaKaRa, Japan) or PTC100 thermal controller<br />
(MJ Research Inc., USA) as follows: 94 ºC for 5 m<strong>in</strong>,<br />
followed by 35 cycles of 94 ºC for 1 m<strong>in</strong>, 55 ºC for 1 m<strong>in</strong>, 72<br />
ºC for 2 m<strong>in</strong>, and end<strong>in</strong>g with 5 m<strong>in</strong> at 72 ºC for the f<strong>in</strong>al<br />
extension. Amplified products were electrophoresed <strong>in</strong> 4%<br />
polyacrylamide denatur<strong>in</strong>g gel and the band<strong>in</strong>g patterns were<br />
visualized by the nonradioactive silver-sta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g method as described<br />
by Panaud et al (1996).<br />
Statistical analyses were performed us<strong>in</strong>g QGENE software<br />
(Nelson 1997). QTL mapp<strong>in</strong>g was conducted on BC 2<br />
data by regression of trait performance on marker genotype<br />
us<strong>in</strong>g standard analysis of variance (ANOVA) procedures. The<br />
map <strong>in</strong>formation on the microsatellite markers used was after<br />
Temnykh et al (2000). A QTL was assumed to be associated<br />
with a marker locus at a significance of P
Panaud O, Chen X, McCouch SR. 1996. Development of<br />
microsatellite markers and characterization of simple sequence<br />
length polymorphism (SSLP) <strong>in</strong> rice (Oryza sativa L.). Mol.<br />
Gen. Genet. 252:597-607.<br />
Tanksley SD, McCouch SR. 1997. Seed banks and molecular maps:<br />
unlock<strong>in</strong>g genetic potential from the wild. Science 277:1063-<br />
1066.<br />
Temnykh S, Park WD, Ayres N, Cart<strong>in</strong>hour S, Hauck N, Lipovich L,<br />
Cho YG, Ishii T, McCouch SR. 2000. Mapp<strong>in</strong>g and genome<br />
organization of microsatellite sequences <strong>in</strong> rice (Oryza sativa<br />
L.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 100:697-712.<br />
Wu KS, Tanksley SD. 1993. Abundance, polymorphism and genetic<br />
mapp<strong>in</strong>g of microsatellites <strong>in</strong> rice. Mol. Gen. Genet. 241:225-<br />
235.<br />
Xiao J, Grandillo S, Ahn SN, McCouch SR, Tanksley SD, Li J, Yuan<br />
L. 1996. Genes from wild rice improve yield. Nature 384:223-<br />
224.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ addresses: T. Ishii, N. Uchida, O. Kamijima, Faculty of<br />
Agriculture, Kobe University, Kobe 657-8501; N.S. Bautista<br />
and K. Shimadzutsu, Graduate School of Science and Technology,<br />
Kobe University, Kobe 657-8501; N. Kobayashi, Experimental<br />
Farm, Kobe University, Kasai, Hyogo 675-2103,<br />
Japan.<br />
Trait-improv<strong>in</strong>g wild QTL alleles identified us<strong>in</strong>g advanced<br />
backcross QTL analysis from a cross between cultivated<br />
rice, Oryza sativa, and wild rice, O. rufipogon<br />
N.S. Bautista, K. Shimadzutsu, T. Teranishi, S. Takamatsu, N. Kobayashi, N. Uchida, O. Kamijima, and T. Ishii<br />
Advanced backcross quantitative trait loci (AB-QTL) analysis was carried out to identify the valuable QTLs from wild species<br />
Oryza rufipogon W630, which is close to the cultivated species but <strong>in</strong>ferior <strong>in</strong> its overall phenotype. The BC 2<br />
testcross population<br />
(O. sativa cv. IR36/O. rufipogon//IR36) consist<strong>in</strong>g of 204 plants was used to evaluate 11 agronomically important quantitative<br />
traits. Segregation of some traits approximately fitted the normal distribution, but transgressive segregants were also<br />
observed for some of the traits studied. Us<strong>in</strong>g 74 microsatellite markers, a total of 51 significant QTLs were identified by s<strong>in</strong>glepo<strong>in</strong>t<br />
analysis, of which 28 (54.9%) had wild QTL alleles that could enhance traits. For yield, four wild QTL alleles for <strong>in</strong>creased<br />
yield were detected. Results suggested that the wild QTL alleles would be useful for improv<strong>in</strong>g traits of agronomic importance<br />
<strong>in</strong> rice.<br />
Many important agronomic traits such as yield, days to head<strong>in</strong>g,<br />
number of panicles, and number of seeds per panicle show<br />
a cont<strong>in</strong>uous range of phenotypes and are controlled by many<br />
genes. These traits with complex <strong>in</strong>heritance are referred to as<br />
quantitative traits. The availability of many new techniques<br />
and saturated molecular maps <strong>in</strong> various crops made it possible<br />
to study the effects of the <strong>in</strong>dividual quantitative trait<br />
loci (QTLs). Recently, a new approach known as advanced<br />
backcross quantitative trait loci (AB-QTL) analysis was developed<br />
to identify and transfer valuable QTLs from unadapted<br />
donor l<strong>in</strong>es such as wild rice <strong>in</strong>to elite breed<strong>in</strong>g l<strong>in</strong>es. Hence,<br />
wild species of rice are now be<strong>in</strong>g used as a source of new<br />
genes believed to be of <strong>in</strong>tr<strong>in</strong>sic value <strong>in</strong> crop improvement.<br />
In this study, trait-improv<strong>in</strong>g QTL alleles from wild species<br />
were identified us<strong>in</strong>g an advanced backcross population<br />
between the cultivated <strong>in</strong>dica rice variety IR36 and the wild<br />
Oryza rufipogon acc. W630 from Myanmar.<br />
Materials and methods<br />
The cultivated O. sativa <strong>in</strong>dica cv. IR36 and wild O. rufipogon<br />
acc. W630 were used <strong>in</strong> the QTL analysis as recurrent and<br />
donor parents, respectively. Each s<strong>in</strong>gle F 1 plant produced from<br />
their cross was used to produce BC 1 plants. Seventeen BC 1<br />
plants were selected to produce the BC 2 population.<br />
Eleven morphological traits—(1) days to head<strong>in</strong>g, (2)<br />
photosynthesis activity, (3) culm length, (4) panicle length, (5)<br />
number of tillers, (6) yield, (7) 100-seed weight, (8) seed length,<br />
(9) seed width, (10) gra<strong>in</strong> length, and (11) gra<strong>in</strong> width—were<br />
evaluated <strong>in</strong> 204 BC 2 plants. Selfed seeds of BC 2 plants<br />
(BC 2 F 2 ) were used <strong>in</strong> the yield-test<strong>in</strong>g trials <strong>in</strong> two locations,<br />
Rokko and Kasai, <strong>in</strong> Japan.<br />
Bulked DNA from more than 10 BC 2 F 2 seedl<strong>in</strong>gs was<br />
used as total DNA of each BC 2 plant. These DNA samples<br />
were used as templates to amplify the rice microsatellite regions.<br />
In total, 113 microsatellite markers cover<strong>in</strong>g the 12 chromosomes<br />
of rice were used <strong>in</strong> this study (Chen et al 1997,<br />
Temnykh et al 2000). The procedure used for the microsatellite<br />
assay was as described by Panaud et al (1996).<br />
Statistical analyses were performed us<strong>in</strong>g QGENE<br />
(Nelson 1997). QTL mapp<strong>in</strong>g was conducted on BC 2 data by<br />
regression of trait performance on marker genotype us<strong>in</strong>g standard<br />
analysis of variance procedures. The QTL was assumed<br />
to be associated with a locus at a significance of P
Table 1. Correlations among 11 morphological traits <strong>in</strong> BC 2 population between O. rufipogon W630 and O. sativa IR36. a<br />
Trait DH PS CL PL NT Y YR YK 100W SL SW GL<br />
Days to head<strong>in</strong>g (DH)<br />
Photosynthesis 0.052<br />
activity (PS)<br />
Culm length (CL) 0.006 –0.135<br />
Panicle length (PL) 0.275** –0.031 0.524**<br />
No. of tillers (NT) 0.301** –0.027 0.196** 0.058<br />
Yield (Y) 0.233** –0.136 0.783** 0.514** 0.549**<br />
Yield <strong>in</strong> Rokko (YR) –0.096 0.033 0.702** 0.338** 0.051 0.587**<br />
Yield <strong>in</strong> Kasai (YK) –0.179* –0.154 0.299** 0.209 –0.183* 0.280** 0.400**<br />
100-gra<strong>in</strong> weight 0.197** 0.014 0.283** 0.231** 0.012 0.351** 0.291** 0.134<br />
(100W)<br />
Seed length (SL) –0.271** –0.122 0.127 0.048 0.016 0.171* 0.213* 0.321** 0.213**<br />
Seed width (SW) 0.056 0.028 0.164* 0.237** 0.033 0.149 0.058 0.160 0.226** 0.000<br />
Gra<strong>in</strong> length (GL) 0.151* 0.073 0.269** 0.136 –0.022 0.260** 0.313** 0.388** 0.434** 0.797** 0.044<br />
Gra<strong>in</strong> width (GW) 0.114 0.100 0.255* 0.316** –0.075 0.264** 0.175* 0.257** 0.468** –0.081 0.559** 0.177*<br />
a * and ** = P
Table 2. Putative QTL locations and the most closely associated markers for 11 morphological characters detected <strong>in</strong> a BC 2 population<br />
between Oryza rufipogon W630 and O. sativa cv. IR36.<br />
Trait Chr. QTL location Marker Source PV (%) a P b AA AW Allele Additive<br />
class c class c effect d % e<br />
Days to head<strong>in</strong>g 6 RM204 RM204 IR36 12.01 0.0007 105.27 99.25 –6.02 –11.44<br />
9 RM242–RM201 RM242 IR36 10.42 0.0015 105.28 99.81 –5.47 –10.39<br />
11 RM4B RM4B W630 11.13 0.0010 102.29 109.06 6.76 13.22<br />
Photosynthesis 6 RM204–RM253 RM253 W630 13.68 0.0003 49.18 54.63 5.44 22.12<br />
activity 11 RM4B RM4B W630 7.39 0.0073 49.78 54.35 4.57 18.36<br />
12 RM20A RM20A IR36 9.03 0.0031 51.48 45.82 –5.66 –21.99<br />
Culm length 1 RM9–RM246 RM5 W630 26.50
Tanksley SD, Grandillo S, Fulton TM, Zamir D, Eshed Y, Petiard V,<br />
Lopez J, Beck-Bunn T. 1996. Advanced backcross QTL analysis<br />
<strong>in</strong> a cross between an elite process<strong>in</strong>g l<strong>in</strong>e of tomato and<br />
its wild relative L. pimp<strong>in</strong>ellifolium. Theor. Appl. Genet.<br />
92:213-224.<br />
Temnykh S, Park WD, Ayres N, Cart<strong>in</strong>hour S, Hauck N, Lipovich L,<br />
Cho YG, Ishii T, McCouch SR. 2000. Mapp<strong>in</strong>g and genome<br />
organization of microsatellite sequences <strong>in</strong> rice (O. sativa L.).<br />
Theor. Appl. Genet. 100:697-712.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ addresses: N.S. Bautista, K. Shimadzutsu, Graduate School<br />
of Science and Technology; T. Teranishi, S. Takamatsu, N.<br />
Uchida, O. Kamijima, T. Ishii, Faculty of Agriculture, Kobe<br />
University, Kobe 657-8501; and N. Kobayashi, Experimental<br />
Farm, Kobe University, Kasai, Hyogo 675-2103, Japan.<br />
Us<strong>in</strong>g new alleles from wild rice Oryza rufipogon to improve<br />
cultivated rice (O. sativa ) <strong>in</strong> Lat<strong>in</strong> America<br />
C.P. Martínez, P. Moncada, J. López, A. Almeida, G. Gallego, J. Borrero, M.C. Duque, W. Roca, S.R. McCouch, C. Bruzzone, and J. Tohme<br />
We report on progress made <strong>in</strong> identify<strong>in</strong>g quantitative trait loci (QTLs) associated with yield <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> Oryza rufipogon. Two<br />
improved rice cultivars (Bg90-2 and Oryzica 3) were crossed to O. rufipogon. The result<strong>in</strong>g BC 2<br />
F 1<br />
was evaluated on the basis<br />
of negative phenotypic selection for undesirable agronomic traits. More than 300 BC 2<br />
F 2<br />
families were grown <strong>in</strong> replicated yield<br />
trials at CIAT (Palmira). Data on 12 agronomic traits, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g gra<strong>in</strong> yield, were recorded. Transgressive segregation was<br />
observed for gra<strong>in</strong> yield and yield components. In the cross Bg90-2/O. rufipogon, and compared with Bg90-2, 16% of the<br />
BC 2<br />
F 2<br />
families showed higher gra<strong>in</strong> yield, while 22% of them had higher 1,000-gra<strong>in</strong> weight; 48% showed higher total gra<strong>in</strong><br />
yield per plant, 43% had longer panicles, and 26% had <strong>in</strong>creased gra<strong>in</strong> length. Similar results were obta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> the cross<br />
Oryzica 3/O. rufipogon. The BC 2<br />
F 2<br />
families were screened us<strong>in</strong>g 140 restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) markers<br />
and 78 microsatellite markers. L<strong>in</strong>kage analysis was conducted us<strong>in</strong>g QGENE with a threshold value of 0.01. Molecular<br />
markers RM13 and RM242 located on chromosomes 5 and 9, respectively, were associated with alleles derived from O.<br />
rufipogon affect<strong>in</strong>g gra<strong>in</strong> yield positively. Out of 69 QTLs identified <strong>in</strong> the cross Bg90-2/O. rufipogon, 18 (26%) were traitimprov<strong>in</strong>g<br />
alleles derived from O. rufipogon and these showed no detectable negative effect on any measured trait. From a<br />
breed<strong>in</strong>g perspective, these QTLs can be used immediately.<br />
Lat<strong>in</strong> America and the Caribbean (LAC) produces some 22<br />
million t of rice, which represents about 3.6% of the world<br />
rice output <strong>in</strong> an area of 6.7 million ha, represent<strong>in</strong>g 4.5% of<br />
the world rice area. Nearly 300 varieties have been released,<br />
90% of them targeted to irrigated conditions; modern semidwarf<br />
varieties with higher yields and resistance to the ma<strong>in</strong><br />
diseases and pests account for 93% of all irrigated rice production,<br />
<strong>in</strong> which average yield went from 3.3 t ha –1 <strong>in</strong> 1966 to<br />
5.0 t ha –1 <strong>in</strong> 1995. However, little progress has been made <strong>in</strong><br />
upland rice and average yield rema<strong>in</strong>s around 1.3 t ha –1 . The<br />
yield of improved upland varieties such as Caiapo typically<br />
averages 2.5 t ha –1 (Moncada et al 2000).<br />
Studies have <strong>in</strong>dicated that yield per se of irrigated rice<br />
<strong>in</strong> LAC has reached a plateau (Martínez et al 1995) probably<br />
because of the narrow genetic base of both irrigated and upland<br />
rice. New alleles can provide genetic variability for crop<br />
enhancement. The wild Oryza species represent a potential<br />
source of new alleles for improv<strong>in</strong>g the yield, quality, and stress<br />
resistance of cultivated rice, but they have rarely been used<br />
for the genetic improvement of quantitative traits (Xiao et al<br />
1998). Xiao et al (1996, 1998) showed that quantitative trait<br />
loci (QTLs) derived from O. rufipogon (IRGC Accession no.<br />
105491) were associated with yield enhancement and other<br />
important agronomic traits. The objective of this paper is to<br />
provide <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g evidence that certa<strong>in</strong> regions <strong>in</strong> O. rufipogon<br />
harbor genes of <strong>in</strong>terest for the genetic improvement of cultivated<br />
rice <strong>in</strong> LAC.<br />
Materials and methods<br />
Population development<br />
Two or three plants of the wild species O. rufipogon were hybridized<br />
to several plants of each of the improved rice cultivars<br />
Bg90-2, Oryzica 3, and Caiapo. Three F 1 hybrid plants<br />
were backcrossed to the improved cultivar, us<strong>in</strong>g the latter as<br />
the female parent; approximately 100–180 BC 1 F 1 seeds were<br />
obta<strong>in</strong>ed per cross comb<strong>in</strong>ation. The result<strong>in</strong>g BC 1 F 1 plants<br />
were transplanted and evaluated on the basis of phenotype:<br />
negative phenotypic selection for undesirable agronomic traits<br />
(spread<strong>in</strong>g plant type, excessive shatter<strong>in</strong>g, long awns, darkcolored<br />
gra<strong>in</strong>s, high sterility, etc.) was used to narrow the selection<br />
down to the best (40–50) <strong>in</strong>dividuals. Each selected<br />
BC 1 <strong>in</strong>dividual was backcrossed aga<strong>in</strong> to the recurrent parent<br />
and approximately 30 BC 2 F 1 seeds were produced: 20 BC 2<br />
seeds from each of the selected BC 1 plants were sown under<br />
irrigated conditions.<br />
Negative phenotypic selection was applied aga<strong>in</strong> and the<br />
best <strong>in</strong>dividuals per cross were selected and harvested <strong>in</strong>di-<br />
138 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
vidually to produce the BC 2 F 2 seed: approximately 220–300<br />
BC 2 F 1 plants were selected per cross comb<strong>in</strong>ation for field<br />
test<strong>in</strong>g. Each selected BC 2 F 2 family was evaluated for 12 agronomic<br />
traits.<br />
Number of families<br />
80<br />
60<br />
BG90-2<br />
Field trials (F 2<br />
, F 3<br />
, F 4<br />
, and F 5<br />
generations)<br />
The BC 2 F 2 families derived from the crosses of Bg90-2,<br />
Oryzica 3, and Caiapo with O. rufipogon were planted <strong>in</strong> replicated<br />
yield trials at CIAT (Palmira) and La Libertad Experiment<br />
Station, Villavicencio. The Caiapo/O. rufipogon cross<br />
was planted under upland-savanna conditions and two different<br />
experiments were run. In the first experiment, BC 2 families<br />
were established as an upland monoculture, while, <strong>in</strong> the<br />
other experiment, the same 300 BC 2 families were planted <strong>in</strong><br />
an adjacent plot <strong>in</strong> association with a pasture crop, Brachiaria<br />
brizantha. Transplant<strong>in</strong>g (20 × 30 cm) was used at CIAT<br />
(Palmira), whereas direct seed<strong>in</strong>g was used elsewhere. A completely<br />
randomized design with two replicates <strong>in</strong> a 2-row plot,<br />
5 m long, was used. Data on 12 agronomic traits were recorded<br />
on 10 randomly selected plants per plot, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g plot gra<strong>in</strong><br />
yield per family.<br />
Based on yield potential and good agronomic traits, 38<br />
BC 2 F 2 families from the cross Bg90-2/O. rufipogon were selected<br />
and advanced by the bulk/pedigree methods and selected<br />
on phenotype only. Evaluations for gra<strong>in</strong> yield were done <strong>in</strong><br />
the F 3 and F 5 generations; a completely randomized design<br />
with four replicates <strong>in</strong> a 4-row plot, 5 m long, was used. Additionally,<br />
288 BC 2 F 2 families were planted under ra<strong>in</strong>fed conditions<br />
<strong>in</strong> Santa Rosa, Villavicencio, to be evaluated and selected<br />
for tolerance for the ma<strong>in</strong> disease (rice blast) and<br />
Helm<strong>in</strong>thosporium, leaf scald, and gra<strong>in</strong> discoloration. Based<br />
on disease reaction and plant type, the best families were selected<br />
and advanced by the bulk method up to the F 5 generation.<br />
The most promis<strong>in</strong>g BC 2 F 2 families were identified <strong>in</strong><br />
the Oryzica 3/O. rufipogon cross and advanced by the pedigree<br />
method to be yield-tested as F 4 families.<br />
Molecular characterization of selected populations<br />
The population of 274 BC 2 F 2 families from the cross Caiapo/<br />
O. rufipogon was analyzed us<strong>in</strong>g 125 markers distributed at<br />
aproximately 10-cM <strong>in</strong>tervals throughout the genome. A total<br />
of 200 restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLPs)<br />
us<strong>in</strong>g four restriction enzymes (EcoRI, EcoRV, H<strong>in</strong>dIII, and<br />
DraI) and 50 simple sequence length polymorphisms (SSLPs)<br />
were used to survey the parents for polymorphism. A total of<br />
84 RFLPs and 43 simple sequence repeats (SSRs) were used<br />
<strong>in</strong> the analysis of Bg90-2/O. rufipogon. SSLP analysis was<br />
done as described <strong>in</strong> Chen et al (1997), with some modifications<br />
<strong>in</strong> the polymerase cha<strong>in</strong> reaction (PCR) profile.<br />
L<strong>in</strong>kage map<br />
The order of the RFLP markers was based on the <strong>in</strong>terspecific<br />
map of rice described by Causse et al (1994) and the order of<br />
SSLP markers was based on Chen et al (1997) and Temnykh<br />
et al (1999). Marker <strong>in</strong>tegration was done by align<strong>in</strong>g markers<br />
common to both populations and establish<strong>in</strong>g the most likely<br />
40<br />
20<br />
O. rufipogon<br />
0<br />
1.0 3.5 6.0 8.5 11.0<br />
Yield (t ha –1 )<br />
Fig. 1. Frequency distribution of gra<strong>in</strong> yield of 300 BC 2 F 2 families<br />
from Bg90-2/O. rufipogon.<br />
order and cM distances us<strong>in</strong>g Mapmaker on the BC 2 F 2 population.<br />
Segregation ratios of <strong>in</strong>dividual markers were statistically<br />
determ<strong>in</strong>ed for each marker locus and deviation from the<br />
expected Mendelian ratios was determ<strong>in</strong>ed by chi-square tests<br />
(P
the BC l<strong>in</strong>es kept their yield advantage over the recurrent parent<br />
through several generations of phenotypic selection; some<br />
of these l<strong>in</strong>es have been sent to national rice programs <strong>in</strong> LAC<br />
for test<strong>in</strong>g under local conditions.<br />
Figure 2 summarizes putative QTLs affect<strong>in</strong>g gra<strong>in</strong> yield<br />
and other agronomic traits that were derived from O. rufipogon.<br />
Based on analyses of 125 SSLP and RFLP markers scored on<br />
274 BC 2 F 2 families from Caiapo/O. rufipogon and us<strong>in</strong>g SPA,<br />
IM, and CIM, Moncada et al (2000) detected two putative O.<br />
rufipogon-derived QTLs for gra<strong>in</strong> yield, 13 for yield components,<br />
four for maturity duration, and six for plant height. In<br />
contrast, based on 43 SSRs and 84 RFLP markers used to score<br />
300 BC 2 F 2 families from the cross Bg90-2/O. rufipogon, at<br />
CIAT we detected two putative QTLs for gra<strong>in</strong> yield derived<br />
from O. rufipogon, 16 for yield components, and one for maturity.<br />
Although the phenotypic performance of the wild parent<br />
would not suggest its value as a useful parent <strong>in</strong> a breed<strong>in</strong>g<br />
program, it is noteworthy that around 51% of the trait-enhanc<strong>in</strong>g<br />
QTLs identified <strong>in</strong> both populations were derived from O.<br />
rufipogon. Similar f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs were reported by Xiao et al (1996,<br />
1998) <strong>in</strong> a BC 2 F 2 population from a cross between O. rufipogon<br />
and a popular Ch<strong>in</strong>ese hybrid.<br />
It is also important to highlight that the picture emerg<strong>in</strong>g<br />
when we consider data from Xiao et al (1998), Moncada et al<br />
(2000), and our work at CIAT is that O. rufipogon possesses<br />
alleles that affect gra<strong>in</strong> yield and its components <strong>in</strong> a positive<br />
manner and these alleles are likely to be expressed regardless<br />
of environment, location, and genetic background.<br />
In conclusion, parallel studies us<strong>in</strong>g advanced backcross<br />
(AB)-QTL analysis provide strong evidence that certa<strong>in</strong> regions<br />
of the rice genome are likely to harbor genes of <strong>in</strong>terest<br />
for the improvement of cultivated rice <strong>in</strong> multiple environments.<br />
This approach seems to have good potential for simultaneously<br />
improv<strong>in</strong>g yield, adaptation, and gra<strong>in</strong> quality for<br />
cultivars <strong>in</strong> LAC and for broaden<strong>in</strong>g the genetic base of both<br />
irrigated and upland rice.<br />
References<br />
Causse MA, Fulton TM, Cho YG, Ahn SN, Chunwongse J, Wu K,<br />
Xiao JL, Yu Z, Ronald PC, Harr<strong>in</strong>gton SE, Second G,<br />
McCouch SR, Tanksley SD. 1994. Saturated molecular map<br />
of the rice genome based on an <strong>in</strong>terspecific backcross population.<br />
<strong>Genetics</strong> 138:1251-1274.<br />
Chen X, Temnykh S, Xu Y, Cho YG, McCouch SR. 1997. Development<br />
of a microsatellite framework map provid<strong>in</strong>g genomewide<br />
coverage <strong>in</strong> rice (Oryza sativa L.). Theor. Appl. Genet.<br />
95:553-567.<br />
Table 1. Agronomic and gra<strong>in</strong> quality traits of the top 10 BC 2 F 5 l<strong>in</strong>es from the cross Bg90-2/O.<br />
rufipogon under transplant<strong>in</strong>g conditions, CIAT, 1999.<br />
Pedigree Gra<strong>in</strong> yield Flower<strong>in</strong>g 1,000-gra<strong>in</strong> White center Gra<strong>in</strong> Amylose<br />
(t ha –1 ) (d) weight (g) (0–5) length (%)<br />
CT13956-29-M-3-M 7.4 96 33.3 3.0 L 31.3<br />
CT 13976-7-M-6-M 7.2 98 30.2 2.2 M 32.0<br />
CT13956-29-M-2-M 7.0 99 30.4 2.0 M 32.1<br />
CT13956-29-M-29-M 7.0 98 33.5 3.4 L 28.9<br />
CT13959-3-M-30-M 6.9 98 31.5 2.0 L 31.6<br />
CT13956-29-M-14-M 6.9 95 29.8 2.2 L 29.3<br />
CT3943-2-M-2-M 6.7 101 30.2 3.0 L 32.0<br />
CT13958-13-M-26-M 6.7 102 28.1 0.6 L 30.9<br />
CT13976-7-M-21-M 6.7 103 32.2 2.8 L 30.8<br />
CT13959-3-M-10-M 6.7 99 31.1 1.8 L 32.0<br />
CT13941-27-M-14-M 6.5 104 28.5 0.8 L 32.0<br />
Bg90-2 (recurrent parent) 5.9 105 29.5 2.6 L 29.8<br />
O. rufipogon 3.8 90 26.7 1.4 M 28.5<br />
Table 2. Gra<strong>in</strong> yield (t ha –1 ) stability of BC 2 l<strong>in</strong>es from the<br />
cross Bg90-2/O. rufipogon through different generations.<br />
Pedigree BC 2 F 2 BC 2 F 3 BC 2 F 5<br />
(1996) a (1997) b (1999) b<br />
CT13941-27-M-14-M 7.0 7.3 6.5<br />
CT13959-3-M-10-M 6.8 6.7 6.7<br />
CT13958-13-M-5-M 6.8 7.0 6.5<br />
CT13943-2-M-2-M 6.7 6.7 6.7<br />
CT13976-7-M-6-M 5.9 7.5 7.2<br />
CT13956-29-M-3-M 6.0 7.2 7.4<br />
Bg90-2 6.0 6.5 5.9<br />
O. rufipogon 2.2 5.0 3.8<br />
a Av. of 2 replications. b Av. of 4 replications.<br />
Martínez CP, Fisher A, González D, Ramírez H, Mojica D. 1995.<br />
Potencial y limitaciones del nuevo tipo de planta de arroz del<br />
<strong>IRRI</strong>. Arroz 15-20.<br />
Moncada P, Martínez CP, Borrero J, Chatel M, Gauch Jr H, Guimarães<br />
EP, Tohme J, McCouch SR. 2000. Quantitative trait loci (QTL)<br />
for yield and yield components <strong>in</strong> an Oryza sativa × Oryza<br />
rufipogon BC 2 F 2 population evaluated <strong>in</strong> an upland environment.<br />
Theor. Appl. Genet. 102(1):41-52.<br />
Temnykh S, Park WD, Ayres N, Cart<strong>in</strong>hour S, Hauck N, Lipovich L,<br />
Cho YG, Ishii T, McCouch SR. 1999. Mapp<strong>in</strong>g and genome<br />
organization of microsatellite sequences <strong>in</strong> rice (Oryza sativa<br />
L.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 100(5):698-712.<br />
Xiao J, Li J, Yuan L, Tanksley SD. 1996. Identification of QTLs<br />
affect<strong>in</strong>g traits of agronomic importance <strong>in</strong> a recomb<strong>in</strong>ant <strong>in</strong>-<br />
140 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
RZ54<br />
RZ54<br />
CDO52<br />
RM<br />
RM22<br />
RG36<br />
RM233<br />
h2.1<br />
RG140<br />
RM243<br />
RZ449<br />
disp1.1<br />
RZ276<br />
RM<br />
spl1.1, spp1.1, gpp1.1<br />
RZ513<br />
ph1.1, gpl1.1, gw1.1, yld1.1<br />
gw1.2<br />
RZ613<br />
RZ462<br />
ph1.2<br />
RM226<br />
RM104<br />
RZ801<br />
dth3.1, dtm3.1<br />
RZ783<br />
RG10<br />
RZ32<br />
Chr 1<br />
RM gpp1.1, ps1.1<br />
RZ99<br />
RM<br />
RG95<br />
RZ73<br />
RZ53<br />
RZ44<br />
RM21<br />
RM6<br />
RM2<br />
RZ54<br />
gpp1.2, pl1.1, gpl1.1,<br />
ps1.2, dth1.3, h1.1<br />
dth3.1<br />
ps3.1<br />
spp2.1<br />
gpp2.1<br />
gpp2.2, spl2.1<br />
spp2.2, spl2.2,<br />
ph2.1, gpl2.1<br />
dth2.1, dtm2.1, ph2.2<br />
spp2.3, gpp2.3<br />
RG14<br />
CDO71<br />
RZ16<br />
RZ10<br />
RM22<br />
RZ56<br />
RG256<br />
RM20<br />
RM26<br />
RM30<br />
Chr 2<br />
RG50<br />
RZ59<br />
RZ47<br />
RG2<br />
RM22<br />
RM<br />
CDO68<br />
RZ66<br />
RM20<br />
RM4<br />
RG37<br />
RM26<br />
RZ6<br />
gpp2.1, gpl2.1<br />
pl2.1<br />
ppl2.1<br />
gpl4.1<br />
gl4.1<br />
RG10<br />
RG10<br />
spp4.1, gpp4.1<br />
RG90<br />
RG44<br />
RG90<br />
RZ65<br />
wid3.1<br />
dth3.2<br />
RM<br />
RZ74<br />
RZ1<br />
RZ58<br />
RZ39<br />
RZ57<br />
RZ2<br />
RZ59<br />
RZ63<br />
RM<br />
RM25<br />
RG91<br />
RG36<br />
RM1<br />
RM5<br />
wc3.2<br />
gl3.1<br />
gl3.2, ps3.2<br />
ph4.1<br />
RM11<br />
RZ74<br />
CDO24<br />
RG16<br />
RM31<br />
RM12<br />
CDO3<br />
RM28<br />
Chr 4<br />
RG17<br />
RZ71<br />
RG32<br />
RG47<br />
RG21<br />
RZ59<br />
BCD13<br />
RG16<br />
gpp4.1<br />
RZ63<br />
gw3.1<br />
RZ99<br />
RM22<br />
RM14<br />
spp5.1, gpp5.1<br />
RG135<br />
RG55<br />
RZ39<br />
RZ55<br />
CDO8<br />
CDO50<br />
RZ29<br />
RZ18<br />
Chr 3<br />
RM12<br />
RM1<br />
RM24<br />
RM16<br />
RZ6<br />
gl5.1, wc5.1<br />
gw5.1, gpp5.1, wc5.3<br />
spl6.1<br />
RZ100<br />
wax<br />
RZ39<br />
RZ14<br />
RM21<br />
RM5<br />
RM20<br />
RZ66<br />
RG44<br />
RM21<br />
RZ61<br />
yld6.1<br />
ph5.2<br />
RG48<br />
RZ92<br />
CDO20<br />
Chr 5<br />
CDO116<br />
RG47<br />
RZ22<br />
RM2<br />
RM3<br />
pl5.1, gpl5.1<br />
gl5.2<br />
ppl6.1<br />
CDO7<br />
RM3<br />
Chr 6<br />
RG102<br />
RM<br />
RZ68<br />
RZ88<br />
pl6.1, h6.1<br />
Fig. 2. Map locations of putative QTLs detected. Threshold value at 1%. Left markers <strong>in</strong>dicate Caiapo/O. rufipogon cross. Right<br />
markers <strong>in</strong>dicate Bg90-2/O. rufipogon cross. QTLs are represented <strong>in</strong> italics and QTLs with <strong>in</strong>creased effect due to O. rufipogon<br />
are represented <strong>in</strong> boldface.<br />
Genetic diversity, evolution, and alien <strong>in</strong>trogression 141
RG35<br />
RG11<br />
RG39<br />
RM24<br />
RM1<br />
RM23<br />
RM15<br />
RG2<br />
RM23<br />
RM3<br />
RM4<br />
ppl8.1, dth8.1<br />
dtm7.1<br />
dth<br />
RG62<br />
RM1<br />
RM12<br />
Chr 7<br />
RG14<br />
CDO40<br />
RG3<br />
RM21<br />
RZ27<br />
RM4<br />
RG<br />
RM14<br />
RM26<br />
RZ32<br />
RZ61<br />
RG103<br />
RM21<br />
RM23<br />
RG59<br />
pl1.1<br />
Chr 8<br />
CDO59<br />
RM22<br />
RZ206<br />
RM25<br />
RZ89<br />
RM21<br />
ps10.1<br />
RZ1<br />
RM24<br />
pl9.1<br />
RM31<br />
BCD38<br />
RM215<br />
yld<br />
disp1 1.1<br />
ste 10.1<br />
RZ40<br />
CDO9<br />
RG35<br />
Chr 9<br />
RG45<br />
RZ40<br />
RM20<br />
ste 10.2<br />
RM30<br />
RZ50<br />
RM14<br />
Chr 10<br />
RZ81<br />
RZ42<br />
wc11.1<br />
ppl11.1<br />
spl11.1<br />
gw11.1<br />
gpl11.1<br />
ydl11.1<br />
gw11.1<br />
RG9<br />
RM28<br />
RZ63<br />
RG11<br />
RG109<br />
RM20<br />
RZ90<br />
RZ53<br />
RM22<br />
RM4, RM20B, RM<br />
C79<br />
RM16<br />
G32<br />
G4<br />
RM2<br />
BCD80 gl11.1<br />
RM25<br />
G146<br />
RM4<br />
RM1<br />
RZ39<br />
RM10<br />
RG86<br />
RG<br />
RM20<br />
RG57<br />
G111<br />
RM1<br />
RZ81<br />
G139<br />
RZ39<br />
RG34<br />
RG8<br />
RG86<br />
RG<br />
RG45<br />
gw12.1<br />
C8<br />
RG30<br />
RZ7<br />
CDO33<br />
RZ26<br />
RZ7<br />
RG54<br />
Chr 11<br />
RZ53<br />
gpl11.1<br />
RM30<br />
RM23<br />
Chr 12<br />
RG19<br />
RG90<br />
RM1<br />
yld12.2<br />
142 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
ed population derived from a subspecific rice cross. Theor.<br />
Appl. Genet. 92:230-244.<br />
Xiao J, Li J, Grandillo S, Sang-Nag A, Tanksley SD, McCouch SR.<br />
1998. Identification of trait-improv<strong>in</strong>g quantitative trait loci<br />
alleles from a wild rice relative, Oryza rufipogon. <strong>Genetics</strong><br />
150:899-909.<br />
Notes<br />
A new gene for resistance to bacterial blight<br />
from Oryza rufipogon<br />
Qi Zhang, S.C. L<strong>in</strong>g, B.Y. Zhao, C.L. Wang, W.C. Yang, K.J. Zhao, L.H. Zhu, D.Y. Li, and C.B. Chen<br />
Authors’ addresses: C.P. Martínez, J. López, A. Almeida, G. Gallego,<br />
J. Borrero, M.C. Duque, W. Roca, C. Bruzzone, J. Tohme,<br />
CIAT, Apartado Aéreo 6713, Cali, Valle, Colombia; P.<br />
Moncada, S.R. McCouch, Department of Plant Breed<strong>in</strong>g, 252<br />
Emerson Hall, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 15863-1901,<br />
USA.<br />
One accession of wild rice Oryza rufipogon, RBB16, was found to be highly resistant to all 16 stra<strong>in</strong>s of Xanthomonas oryzae<br />
pv. oryzae, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g seven Ch<strong>in</strong>ese pathotypes and n<strong>in</strong>e Philipp<strong>in</strong>e races. RBB16 was crossed with JG30, a susceptible <strong>in</strong>dica<br />
variety, and the F 1<br />
was highly resistant to stra<strong>in</strong> PXO99. The F 1<br />
was used to produce doubled haploids through anther culture.<br />
Resistant H 2<br />
plants were advanced to H 4<br />
, which was then backcrossed with the recurrent parent JG30. The BC plants similar<br />
5<br />
to JG30 and resistant to all 16 stra<strong>in</strong>s were selfed four times and a near-isogenic l<strong>in</strong>e with resistance was developed and<br />
designated as WBB1. Inoculation tests showed that WBB1 was highly resistant to the n<strong>in</strong>e Philipp<strong>in</strong>e races at both the seedl<strong>in</strong>g<br />
and adult stages, while IRBB21 had the same broad spectrum of resistance at the tiller<strong>in</strong>g stage but not at the seedl<strong>in</strong>g stage.<br />
Inheritance analysis showed that the resistance of WBB1 to PXO99 is controlled by a s<strong>in</strong>gle dom<strong>in</strong>ant gene. After screen<strong>in</strong>g<br />
160 simple sequence repeat primers, two markers (OSR6 and RM224) were found to be l<strong>in</strong>ked with the resistance gene. The<br />
gene was mapped on rice chromosome 11, which is 5.3 cM from OSR6 and 27.7 cM from RM224. We have designated the<br />
new gene from O. rufipogon as Xa23(t).<br />
Bacterial blight (BB) caused by Xanthomonas oryzae pv.<br />
oryzae (Xoo) is a serious rice disease <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a. The resistance<br />
gene Xa4 has been widely used <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>dica hybrids and <strong>in</strong>bred<br />
cultivars. A strong selection among the pathogen population<br />
has <strong>in</strong>creased the frequency of Ch<strong>in</strong>ese pathotype V, which is<br />
virulent to Xa4. Varieties with Xa4 became susceptible (Zhang<br />
et al 1994). Khush et al (1990) identified a new resistance<br />
gene, Xa21, from Oryza longistam<strong>in</strong>ata. It was mapped on<br />
chromosome 11.<br />
Twenty-one resistant accessions from wild rice were reevaluated<br />
with seven Ch<strong>in</strong>ese pathotypes, six Philipp<strong>in</strong>e races,<br />
and three Japanese races at both the seedl<strong>in</strong>g and adult stages.<br />
One accession, RBB16, from O. rufipogon, showed resistance<br />
to all the stra<strong>in</strong>s used (Zhang et al 1994). An <strong>in</strong>terspecific cross<br />
was made between RBB16 and JG30, a susceptible <strong>in</strong>dica cultivar.<br />
We report on the identification of and molecular mapp<strong>in</strong>g<br />
of the gene transferred from O. rufipogon <strong>in</strong>to rice.<br />
Materials and methods<br />
S<strong>in</strong>ce the resistance of WBB1 was controlled by a dom<strong>in</strong>ant<br />
gene (as analyzed <strong>in</strong> a previous study), six near-isogenic l<strong>in</strong>es<br />
(NILs) with BB dom<strong>in</strong>ant resistance genes—Xa21, Xa3, Xa4,<br />
Xa7, Xa10, and Xa14 (Ogawa et al 1991)—were used as testers.<br />
WBB1 was crossed with susceptible cultivar JG30 and<br />
populations of F 2 and BC 1 F 1 were developed. In a previous<br />
study, we found that none of the known genes, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g Xa1,<br />
Xa2, Xa3, Xa4, and Xa7, were allelic to the resistance gene <strong>in</strong><br />
WBB1 (L<strong>in</strong> et al 1992).<br />
Sixteen stra<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g seven Ch<strong>in</strong>ese pathotypes and<br />
n<strong>in</strong>e Philipp<strong>in</strong>e races were used. To exam<strong>in</strong>e the segregation<br />
of the resistance gene, the F 2 populations were tested with stra<strong>in</strong><br />
PXO99. Inoculum was prepared with a concentration of about<br />
10 9 cells mL –1 . Fully expanded leaves of the plants were <strong>in</strong>oculated<br />
at the seedl<strong>in</strong>g stage. Lesions were scored 14 d after<br />
<strong>in</strong>oculation by visual assessment of percentage of lesion area.<br />
Genomic DNA was isolated accord<strong>in</strong>g to Dellaporta et<br />
al (1983). Total DNA was digested with restriction enzymes<br />
BamHI, BglII, DraI, EcoRI, EcoRV, H<strong>in</strong>dIII, SacI, and XbaI,<br />
separated by electrophoresis on 0.8% agarose gel and transferred<br />
onto nylon membranes. Fifteen restriction fragment<br />
length polymorphism (RFLP) markers located near the region<br />
of simple sequence repeat (SSR) marker OSR6 were used as<br />
probes to survey WBB1, JG30, F 1 , and resistant/susceptible<br />
bulks of F 2 . The RFLP markers were further analyzed <strong>in</strong> the<br />
F 2 population of 148 plants.<br />
One hundred and sixty SSR primers were surveyed for<br />
their ability to amplify the polymorphic bands between the<br />
parents and the resistant and susceptible bulks. Polymerase<br />
cha<strong>in</strong> reaction was performed accord<strong>in</strong>g to Panaud et al (1996).<br />
A 148-plant F 2 population was used for l<strong>in</strong>kage analysis<br />
of the resistance gene and the SSR and RFLP markers. Markers<br />
were placed on the l<strong>in</strong>kage map by us<strong>in</strong>g the program<br />
Mapmaker 3.0. Distances between markers are presented <strong>in</strong><br />
Genetic diversity, evolution, and alien <strong>in</strong>trogression 143
Susceptible progenies<br />
Resistant progenies<br />
S Pool<br />
R Pool<br />
JG30<br />
F 1<br />
WBB1<br />
Fig. 1. Cosegregation between<br />
Xa23(t) and OSR6 <strong>in</strong> F 2<br />
progenies derived from JG30/<br />
WBB1.<br />
centiMorgans, derived by us<strong>in</strong>g the Kosambi function<br />
(Kosambi 1994). All markers were ordered at LOD>3.0.<br />
Results and discussion<br />
WBB1 showed resistance to the n<strong>in</strong>e races at all growth stages.<br />
IRBB21 also showed resistance to the n<strong>in</strong>e races at the tiller<strong>in</strong>g<br />
stage but not at the seedl<strong>in</strong>g stage. Xa3, Xa4, Xa7, Xa10, and<br />
Xa14 showed no resistance to race 6, but showed resistance to<br />
other races. The resistant reactions of WBB1 to the n<strong>in</strong>e Philipp<strong>in</strong>e<br />
races are different from that of gene Xa21 and other<br />
testers.<br />
All the F 1 plants from the cross WBB1/JG30 were highly<br />
resistant to PXO99. The F 2 populations segregated <strong>in</strong> a ratio<br />
of 3R:1S (x 2 = 0.88, P>0.25), and the BC 1 F 1 segregated <strong>in</strong> a<br />
ratio of 1R:1S (x 2 = 0.06, P>0.25). The results <strong>in</strong>dicate that<br />
WBB1’s resistance to PXO99 is controlled by a s<strong>in</strong>gle dom<strong>in</strong>ant<br />
gene.<br />
SSR analysis was performed us<strong>in</strong>g WBB1, JG30, and<br />
the resistant/susceptible DNA bulks. Among the 160 SSR<br />
primer pairs screened, OSR6 and RM224 detected polymorphism<br />
between WBB1 and JG30 or the R pool and S pool<br />
(Fig. 1). All 148 F 2 plants were surveyed with SSR primers<br />
OSR6 and RM224 and l<strong>in</strong>kage analysis was performed. The<br />
new gene of WBB1 was mapped between two loci, 5.3 cM<br />
from OSR6 and 27.7 cM from RM224, on rice chromosome<br />
11 (Fig. 2).<br />
RFLP markers <strong>in</strong> the region near OSR6 were selected to<br />
probe the Southern blots of WBB1, F 1 , and JG30 DNA digested<br />
with enzymes BamHI, BglII, DraI, EcoRI, EcoRV,<br />
H<strong>in</strong>dIII, SacI, and XbaI. Of 15 probes tested, only G1465 detected<br />
polymorphism between the parents, and this was then<br />
used to survey the filters of 148 F 2 plants. The distance between<br />
RFLP marker G1465 and the new gene was 16.7 cM<br />
(Fig. 2). Thus, the gene for resistance to BB from O. rufipogon<br />
appears to be dist<strong>in</strong>ct from all the known resistance genes. We<br />
have designated the new gene as Xa23(t).<br />
References<br />
Dellaporta SL, Wood J, Hicks JB. 1983. A plant DNA m<strong>in</strong>i-preparation:<br />
version II. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 1:19-21.<br />
Khush GS, Bacalangco E, Ogawa T. 1990. A new gene for resistance<br />
to bacterial blight from O. longistam<strong>in</strong>ata. <strong>Rice</strong> Genet.<br />
Newsl. 7:121-122.<br />
Kosambi DD. 1994. The estimation of map distances from recomb<strong>in</strong>ation<br />
values. Ann. Eugenet. 12:172-175.<br />
cM<br />
18.4<br />
15.5<br />
16.3<br />
19.7<br />
4.2<br />
RG103<br />
RG1109<br />
CDO520<br />
OSR6<br />
G1465<br />
RM224<br />
L190<br />
RZ536<br />
Xa21<br />
Xa23(t)<br />
Xa7<br />
Xa3<br />
Xa4<br />
Fig. 2. Location of Xa23(t) on<br />
the molecular map. The positions<br />
of other markers and<br />
bacterial blight resistance<br />
genes are accord<strong>in</strong>g to<br />
Causse et al (1994).<br />
L<strong>in</strong> SC, Zhang Q, Que GS, X<strong>in</strong>g ZY, Wang CL. 1992. Evaluation<br />
and genetic analysis for resistance to bacterial blight <strong>in</strong> wild<br />
rice. Ch<strong>in</strong>. J. <strong>Rice</strong> Sci. 6(4):155-158.<br />
Ogawa T, Yamamoto T, Khush GS, Mew TW. 1991. Breed<strong>in</strong>g of<br />
near-isogenic l<strong>in</strong>es of rice with s<strong>in</strong>gle genes for resistance to<br />
bacterial blight pathogen (Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae)<br />
<strong>in</strong> wild rice. Jpn. J. Breed. 41:523-529.<br />
Panaud O, Chen X, McCouch SR. 1996. Development of<br />
microsatellite markers and characterization of simple sequence<br />
length polymorphisms (SSLPs) <strong>in</strong> rice (Oryza sativa L.). Mol.<br />
Gen. Genet. 252:597-607.<br />
Zhang Q, Wang CL, Shi AN, Bai JF, L<strong>in</strong> SC. 1994. Evaluation of<br />
resistance to bacterial blight (Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae)<br />
<strong>in</strong> wild species. Sci. Agric. S<strong>in</strong>. 27(5):1-9.<br />
144 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
Notes<br />
Authors’ addresses: Qi Zhang, S.C. L<strong>in</strong>g, B.Y. Zhao, C.L. Wang,<br />
and K.J. Zhao, Key Laboratory of Crop <strong>Genetics</strong> and Breed<strong>in</strong>g,<br />
M<strong>in</strong>istry of Agriculture, Institute of Crop Breed<strong>in</strong>g and<br />
Cultivation, CAAS, Beij<strong>in</strong>g, 100081, Ch<strong>in</strong>a; L.H. Zhu, Institute<br />
of <strong>Genetics</strong>, Academia S<strong>in</strong>ica, Beij<strong>in</strong>g, 100101, Ch<strong>in</strong>a;<br />
Identify<strong>in</strong>g blast resistance <strong>in</strong> Oryza species<br />
and its <strong>in</strong>trogression <strong>in</strong>to U.S. rice cultivars<br />
G.C. Eizenga, T.H. Tai, F.N. Lee, and J.N. Rutger<br />
D.Y. Li and C.B. Chen, Institute of Germplasm Resources,<br />
GAAS, Na<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g, 530007, Ch<strong>in</strong>a.<br />
Acknowledgments: This work was supported <strong>in</strong> part by the<br />
Rockefeller Foundation (No. 1994-001#253, 97001#586) and<br />
the National Natural Science Foundation of Ch<strong>in</strong>a (No.<br />
39670508).<br />
Blast (caused by Pyricularia grisea Cav.) is the major fungal disease affect<strong>in</strong>g rice <strong>in</strong> the United States. Wild species have often<br />
served as sources of disease resistance genes for crop plants. Research objectives were to (1) develop a method for screen<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Oryza spp. and their progenies for resistance to rice blast races and (2) use closely l<strong>in</strong>ked microsatellite markers to follow the<br />
<strong>in</strong>trogression of blast resistance from Oryza spp. <strong>in</strong>to cultivated rice. Twenty-one accessions, represent<strong>in</strong>g O. barthii, O.<br />
glumaepatula, O. meridionalis, O. nivara, and O. rufipogon, were <strong>in</strong>oculated with U.S. blast races IB-1, IB-33, IB-49, IC-17, IE-<br />
1K, IG-1, and IH-1 and rated for susceptibility. Some O. nivara accessions and an O. rufipogon accession appeared to have<br />
resistance to certa<strong>in</strong> U.S. blast races. The Oryza spp. were crossed with the long-gra<strong>in</strong> experimental l<strong>in</strong>e RU9401188 and the<br />
medium-gra<strong>in</strong> cultivar Bengal. The F 2<br />
progenies from these crosses and self seed from BC 1<br />
progenies were evaluated for blast<br />
resistance. Microsatellite markers, which map to previously identified blast resistance regions, are be<strong>in</strong>g used to follow the<br />
<strong>in</strong>trogression of Oryza sp. DNA <strong>in</strong>to cultivated rice. Additional markers will be screened to identify novel Pi loci.<br />
Blast (caused by Pyricularia grisea Cav.) is one of the major<br />
fungal diseases affect<strong>in</strong>g rice (Oryza sativa L.) <strong>in</strong> the United<br />
States (Bonman 1992). Six different blast l<strong>in</strong>eages are commonly<br />
found <strong>in</strong> the U.S. P. grisea population (Correll and Lee<br />
1996).<br />
Wild relatives of Oryza are an important source of useful<br />
genes for improvement of cultivated rice as summarized<br />
by Khush (1989) and Sitch (1990). In U.S. germplasm, however,<br />
only stem rot (caused by Sclerotium oryzae Cattaneo)<br />
resistance has been reported to be <strong>in</strong>trogressed from O.<br />
rufipogon (Rutger et al 1987). Restriction fragment length<br />
polymorphism (RFLP) and random amplified polymorphic<br />
DNA markers closely l<strong>in</strong>ked to blast resistance genes (Pi genes)<br />
have been previously identified (McCouch et al 1994). Chen<br />
et al (1997) described 121 rice microsatellite markers and suggested<br />
that these markers could be used for genotype identification<br />
and marker-assisted selection. In the U.S., researchers<br />
are survey<strong>in</strong>g microsatellite markers to determ<strong>in</strong>e those very<br />
closely l<strong>in</strong>ked to certa<strong>in</strong> Pi genes.<br />
The objectives of this study were to (1) develop a method<br />
for screen<strong>in</strong>g Oryza spp. and their progenies for resistance to<br />
the U.S. rice blast races and (2) identify microsatellite markers<br />
closely l<strong>in</strong>ked to regions conferr<strong>in</strong>g blast resistance, which<br />
could be used to follow the <strong>in</strong>trogression of the Oryza sp. segments<br />
<strong>in</strong>to cultivated rice.<br />
Materials and methods<br />
Twenty-one species (AA genome) represent<strong>in</strong>g O. barthii, O.<br />
glumaepatula, O. meridionalis, O. nivara, and O. rufipogon<br />
were <strong>in</strong>oculated with a spore suspension of U.S. blast races<br />
IB-1, IB-33, IB-49, IC-17, IE-1K, IG-1, and IH-1 at the fourto<br />
five-leaf growth stage. One week after <strong>in</strong>oculation, plants<br />
were rated for blast susceptibility us<strong>in</strong>g a scale of 0 = no lesions<br />
to 9 = large susceptible lesions and/or leaves dy<strong>in</strong>g. Two<br />
or three repeat <strong>in</strong>oculations and rat<strong>in</strong>gs were made on the same<br />
plants us<strong>in</strong>g this procedure. To <strong>in</strong>corporate blast resistance <strong>in</strong>to<br />
cultivated rice, the Oryza spp. were backcrossed with the longgra<strong>in</strong><br />
experimental l<strong>in</strong>e RU9401188 and the medium-gra<strong>in</strong><br />
cultivar Bengal (L<strong>in</strong>scombe et al 1993), both of which are<br />
adapted to the southern U.S. Progenies were evaluated for blast<br />
resistance us<strong>in</strong>g the aforementioned procedure.<br />
Us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>Rice</strong>Genes (http://ars-genome.cornell.edu/rice/),<br />
25 microsatellite markers were selected (RM17, RM21, RM39,<br />
RM50, RM51, RM82, RM83, RM101, RM119, RM120,<br />
RM136, RM208, RM210, RM213, RM221, RM223, RM229,<br />
RM235, RM238b, RM241, RM249, RM254, RM255, RM256,<br />
and RM263), which were closely l<strong>in</strong>ked to RFLP fragments<br />
associated with blast resistance or mapped to the same chromosomal<br />
regions as Pi genes. The markers were obta<strong>in</strong>ed from<br />
Research <strong>Genetics</strong> (Huntsville, Alabama) and amplified accord<strong>in</strong>g<br />
to the manufacturer’s specifications. Markers were run<br />
on a 4% polyacrylamide gel and visualized by silver sta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />
(Chen et al 1997).<br />
Genetic diversity, evolution, and alien <strong>in</strong>trogression 145
Table 1. Oryza species rated for blast tolerance <strong>in</strong> the seedl<strong>in</strong>g stage us<strong>in</strong>g blast races found <strong>in</strong> the U.S.<br />
Species No. of Blast races a<br />
accessions<br />
IB-1 IB-33 IB-49 IC-17 IE-1K IG-1 IH-1<br />
O. barthii 6 MS-S S S MR-MS S MS-S MR-S<br />
O. glumaepatula 3 S S S MS MS-S S MR-MS<br />
O. meridionalis 3 MS-S S S MS MS-S S MR-MS<br />
O. nivara 5 MR-S MR-S MR-S R-MS R-MS-S R-S R-MR-MS<br />
O. nivara/O. sativa 2 MR-MS S S MR-MS S R-MR MS<br />
O. rufipogon 1 MR S MR MR MS MR MR<br />
O. sativa/O. nivara 1 MS S MS MS S MS MS<br />
a S = susceptible, MS = moderately susceptible, MR = moderately resistant, and R = resistant.<br />
Results and discussion<br />
Blast screen<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong>dicated <strong>in</strong>dividual O. nivara accessions and<br />
an O. rufipogon accession hav<strong>in</strong>g resistance to specific U.S.<br />
blast races (Table 1). Results from blast <strong>in</strong>oculations of the F 2<br />
progenies produced by fertile F 1 plants suggest that resistance<br />
to some blast races may be transferred <strong>in</strong>to the U.S. cultivars<br />
from some of the wild Oryza spp. but the cultivated parents,<br />
RU9401188 and Bengal, are mask<strong>in</strong>g the Oryza sp. resistance.<br />
As a result, crosses are also be<strong>in</strong>g made with M201, which is<br />
susceptible to the blast races tested <strong>in</strong> this study.<br />
Surveys of microsatellite markers aga<strong>in</strong>st families that<br />
had progenies showed that 23 of the 25 markers were polymorphic<br />
with at least one AA-genome parent show<strong>in</strong>g blast<br />
resistance. These markers are be<strong>in</strong>g used to follow the <strong>in</strong>trogression<br />
of Oryza sp. DNA <strong>in</strong>to cultivated rice (Fig. 1). Once<br />
additional markers from Fjellstrom et al (this volume) and novel<br />
Pi loci become available, the blast resistance identified <strong>in</strong> this<br />
study may be characterized to a higher degree.<br />
References<br />
Bonman JM. 1992. Blast. In: Webster RK, Gunnell PS, editors. Compendium<br />
of rice diseases. St. Paul, MN (USA): APS Press.<br />
p 14-17.<br />
Chen X, Temnykh S, Xu Y, Cho YG, McCouch SR. 1997. Development<br />
of a microsatellite framework map provid<strong>in</strong>g genomewide<br />
coverage <strong>in</strong> rice (Oryza sativa L.). Theor. Appl. Genet.<br />
95:553-567.<br />
Correll JC, Lee FN. 1996. The relationship between race and DNA<br />
f<strong>in</strong>gerpr<strong>in</strong>t groups <strong>in</strong> the rice blast pathogen. Arkansas <strong>Rice</strong><br />
Res. Stud. Res. Ser. 453:119-125.<br />
Khush GS. 1989. Multiple disease and <strong>in</strong>sect resistance for <strong>in</strong>creased<br />
yield stability <strong>in</strong> rice. In: Progress <strong>in</strong> irrigated rice research.<br />
Manila (Philipp<strong>in</strong>es): <strong>International</strong> <strong>Rice</strong> Research Institute.<br />
p 79-92.<br />
L<strong>in</strong>scombe SD, Jodari F, McKenzie KS, Bollich PK, Groth DE, White<br />
LM, Dunand RT, Sanders DE. 1993. Registration of ‘Bengal’<br />
rice. Crop Sci. 33:645-646.<br />
McCouch SR, Nelson RJ, Tohme J, Zeigler RS. 1994. Mapp<strong>in</strong>g of<br />
blast resistance genes <strong>in</strong> rice. In: Zeigler RS, Leong SA, Teng<br />
PS, editors. <strong>Rice</strong> blast disease. Wall<strong>in</strong>gford (UK): CAB <strong>International</strong>.<br />
p 167-186.<br />
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11<br />
Fig. 1. RM213 differentiat<strong>in</strong>g<br />
RU9401188 (lane<br />
1), O. nivara (<strong>IRRI</strong><br />
100898) (lane 2),<br />
F 1 (lane 3), BC 1<br />
progenies (lanes<br />
4–6) and BC 2 progenies<br />
(lanes 7–11)<br />
from this cross.<br />
RM213 is located<br />
near the region of<br />
Pib on rice chromosome<br />
2<br />
(<strong>Rice</strong>Genes; http:/<br />
ars-genome.cornell.<br />
edu/rice/).<br />
Rutger JN, Figoni RA, Webster RK, Oster JJ, McKenzie KS. 1987.<br />
Registration of early matur<strong>in</strong>g, marker gene, and stem rotresistant<br />
germplasm l<strong>in</strong>es of rice. Crop Sci. 27:1319-1320.<br />
Sitch LA. 1990. Incompatibility barriers operat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> crosses of Oryza<br />
sativa with related species and genera. In: Gustafson JP, editor.<br />
Gene manipulation and plant improvement II. Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs<br />
of the 19th Stadler <strong>Genetics</strong> Symposium, Columbia, MO,<br />
13-15 March 1989. New York (USA): Plenum Press. p 77-<br />
93.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ address: G.C. Eizenga and T.H. Tai, Dale Bumpers National<br />
<strong>Rice</strong> Research Center, USDA-ARS, Stuttgart, Arkansas<br />
72160-0287; F.N. Lee and J.N. Rutger, <strong>Rice</strong> Research and<br />
Extension Center, University of Arkansas, Stuttgart, Arkansas<br />
72160-0351, USA.<br />
146 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
Evaluation of O. sativa × O. glaberrima–derived<br />
l<strong>in</strong>es us<strong>in</strong>g microsatellite markers<br />
M.-N. Ndjiondjop, J. Coburn, M.P. Jones, and S. McCouch<br />
West African rice breeders have been try<strong>in</strong>g for several decades to develop Oryza sativa varieties that comb<strong>in</strong>e high yield<br />
potential and stress-adaptation traits (soil-toxicity and drought tolerance, pest and disease resistance). The <strong>in</strong>digenous African<br />
cultivated species, O. glaberrima Steud., is an important reservoir of useful genes for resistance to major stresses, but it has<br />
not been much exploited by breeders, ma<strong>in</strong>ly because of the lack of fertility of <strong>in</strong>terspecific hybrids. The West Africa <strong>Rice</strong><br />
Development Association (WARDA) produced several hundred fixed genotypes derived from <strong>in</strong>terspecific crosses between<br />
CG14 (O. glaberrima) and japonica rice WAB 56-104 (O. sativa). We selected 50 fixed l<strong>in</strong>es obta<strong>in</strong>ed after tissue culture and<br />
50 <strong>in</strong>terbreed<strong>in</strong>g l<strong>in</strong>es. A set of 100 microsatellites dispersed over the 12 chromosomes of rice was used. The polymorphism<br />
between the two parents was up to 90%. The regions of the genome carry<strong>in</strong>g O. glaberrima segments will be targeted for the<br />
development of near-isogenic l<strong>in</strong>es.<br />
The genus Oryza has two cultivated species: O. sativa, which<br />
is grown worldwide, and O. glaberrima, which is cultivated <strong>in</strong><br />
tropical West Africa. The African cultivated rice has been <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly<br />
replaced by the Asian cultivated species, O. sativa,<br />
because of its low yield potential (caused by gra<strong>in</strong> shatter<strong>in</strong>g<br />
and lodg<strong>in</strong>g susceptibility), but African farmers still favor O.<br />
glaberrima. In Asian rice, variability <strong>in</strong> resistance to rice yellow<br />
mottle virus (RYMV) and African rice gall midge<br />
(AfRGM) is limited. This resistance is found <strong>in</strong> the African<br />
rice species, which also has several other useful traits such as<br />
high weed competitiveness (because of early vigor and excellent<br />
ground cover) and tolerance for drought, soil acidity, and<br />
other stresses. The reproductive barriers between the two species<br />
make the use of O. glaberrima <strong>in</strong> rice improvement difficult.<br />
To overcome the sterility and recomb<strong>in</strong>ation restriction,<br />
we use anther culture to obta<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>terspecific hybrids and backcross<br />
progenies. Several hundred <strong>in</strong>terspecific l<strong>in</strong>es derived<br />
from crosses between varieties WAB56-104 (O. sativa subsp.<br />
japonica) and CG14 (O. glaberrima) were developed at<br />
WARDA. The best of these l<strong>in</strong>es are dubbed “new rice for<br />
Africa” (NERICA). We propose here the use of microsatellite<br />
markers for the molecular evaluation of the <strong>in</strong>terspecific progenies<br />
with desired phenotypic traits.<br />
Results<br />
Polymorphism survey us<strong>in</strong>g microsatellite markers<br />
In late 1998, the WARDA Molecular Biology Laboratory began<br />
research on polymorphism on eight varieties us<strong>in</strong>g<br />
microsatellites. All the comb<strong>in</strong>ations between O. sativa and<br />
O. glaberrima parent material revealed a high level of <strong>in</strong>terspecific<br />
polymorphism (at least 78%). Polymorphism was also<br />
detected among the three O. glaberrima varieties (CG14,<br />
CG20, and IG10) <strong>in</strong> 12 of 17 marker comparisons.<br />
The microsatellite survey detected a high level of polymorphism.<br />
Each locus had at least two alleles of widely different<br />
sizes. This confirms the strong variability characteristic of<br />
microsatellites <strong>in</strong> comparison with isozyme and restriction fragment<br />
length polymorphism markers.<br />
Allelic frequency <strong>in</strong> the derived <strong>in</strong>terspecific l<strong>in</strong>es<br />
The frequency of O. glaberrima alleles <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>terspecific l<strong>in</strong>es<br />
was up to 20% (Table 1). The percentage of heterozygotes<br />
was very low across the <strong>in</strong>terspecific l<strong>in</strong>es. Some l<strong>in</strong>es had<br />
more <strong>in</strong>trogressed alleles from O. glaberrima than others, but<br />
<strong>in</strong> general the O. glaberrima genome was found across the<br />
<strong>in</strong>terspecific l<strong>in</strong>es. Among the <strong>in</strong>dividuals tested, most had 12%<br />
of their alleles from CG14. This result meets the theoretical<br />
expectation s<strong>in</strong>ce the genotypes tested were <strong>in</strong> the BC 2 F 8 generation.<br />
The microsatellite markers RM284, RM435, RM164,<br />
and RM462 showed preferential selection for the O. glaberrima<br />
genome across the l<strong>in</strong>es. Marker RM435 was located on chromosome<br />
6, where a gamete killer gene is <strong>in</strong> the O. glaberrima<br />
genome responsible for sterility <strong>in</strong> the F 1 hybrid between O.<br />
sativa and O. glaberrima; the other markers occurred on chromosomes<br />
1, 5, and 8.<br />
The graphical genotyp<strong>in</strong>g of these two l<strong>in</strong>es showed that<br />
they have <strong>in</strong>herited CG14 alleles <strong>in</strong> the O. sativa background<br />
<strong>in</strong> almost all parts of the genome. The new recomb<strong>in</strong>ation had<br />
occurred dur<strong>in</strong>g an earlier generation. Genotypes selected for<br />
anther culture have been shown to be pure l<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong> our experiments.<br />
No heterozygote was found <strong>in</strong> the l<strong>in</strong>es produced<br />
through anther culture. Individuals derived through classical<br />
breed<strong>in</strong>g showed a low level of heterozygosity.<br />
Discussion<br />
Among the 80 microsatellites used, 67 showed good amplification<br />
patterns and the range of the alleles for each marker<br />
was high. Several microsatellite markers showed complete<br />
cosegregation across the <strong>in</strong>terspecific l<strong>in</strong>es. The coverage of<br />
the genome was not complete; some parts of the genome needed<br />
to be saturated us<strong>in</strong>g new markers. Introgression of the O.<br />
Genetic diversity, evolution, and alien <strong>in</strong>trogression 147
Table 1. Allelic frequencies <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>terspecific l<strong>in</strong>es of rice.<br />
Allele frequencies (%)<br />
Interspecific l<strong>in</strong>e O. glaberrima Japonica Extra Heterozygote Miss<strong>in</strong>g<br />
allele allele allele data<br />
WAB450-I-B-P-138-HB 9 73 6 0 12<br />
WAB450-I-B-P-160-HB 12 52 13 1.5 20<br />
WAB450-I-B-P-33-HB 5 71 10 1.5 12.5<br />
WAB450-11-1-1-P31-H 12 70 10 1.5 6.5<br />
WAB450-24-3-2-P18-H 12 67 12 3 6<br />
WAB450-I-B-P-153-HB 18 58 9 1.5 13<br />
WAB450-5-1-BL1-DV6 10 49 16 0 24<br />
WAB450-B-16A1.4 15 52 24 0 9<br />
WAB450-4A2 14 46 7.5 3 29.5<br />
WAB450-4-1-A16 20 38 7.5 6 28<br />
WAB450-B-16A2.7 12 37 18 1.5 31.5<br />
WAB450-B-16A1.8 14 43 22.4 3.6 17<br />
glaberrima alleles <strong>in</strong>to the O. sativa background was visualized<br />
on the gel after silver sta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g. The ABI GeneScan TM was<br />
also used to detect some segments similar to the ones found <strong>in</strong><br />
the O. glaberrima parent. The latter method was preferentially<br />
used for this study because it is more sensitive and more precise<br />
for the genotyp<strong>in</strong>g process.<br />
Allelic frequency<br />
The distribution of allele frequency from O. glaberrima showed<br />
the maximum frequency at 12% and almost 87% for O. sativa.<br />
This fits well with the normal segregation of the alleles of each<br />
parent when the progenies are <strong>in</strong> the BC 2 F 8 generation. The<br />
level of heterozygosity also fits the expected ratio. Moreover,<br />
the level of extra alleles seemed high, s<strong>in</strong>ce the crosses have<br />
been grown <strong>in</strong> the field, where it would be difficult to avoid<br />
outcross<strong>in</strong>g. Other factors could expla<strong>in</strong> the level of extra alleles<br />
that we observed: (1) the residual heterozygosity rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>in</strong> the parent when crosses were made and (2) the parent<br />
stock chang<strong>in</strong>g genetically after it was used to make the crosses,<br />
by mutation, by contam<strong>in</strong>ation by outcross<strong>in</strong>g, or by physical<br />
mix<strong>in</strong>g of the seed from another genotype.<br />
Segregation distortion<br />
Segregation distortion is frequently observed <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>terspecific<br />
progenies. In our study, we found a strong segregation<br />
distortion on chromosome 5 (RM164), chromosome 1<br />
(RM284), and chromosome 8 (RM462). RM435 was located<br />
on chromosome 6 and 50% of the l<strong>in</strong>es showed the O.<br />
glaberrima allele. Some previous studies on <strong>in</strong>terspecific progenies<br />
between O. glaberrima and O. sativa showed a strong<br />
segregation distortion on chromosome 6, close to the<br />
microsatellite markers OSR19 and OSR25, both conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />
the waxy gene. This could be due to the presence of a sporogametophytic<br />
sterility factor, s10, which was already found to<br />
be tightly l<strong>in</strong>ked to the waxy gene (Sano et al 1984). The ma<strong>in</strong><br />
effect of this factor is that, <strong>in</strong> the heterozygous genotypes, male<br />
gametes are systematically elim<strong>in</strong>ated and female gametes carry<br />
the O. sativa alleles. In our study, some of the markers that<br />
showed the preferential selection of the CG14 alleles (O.<br />
glaberrima parent) were not on chromosome 6, so the mechanism<br />
<strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> our study is probably different from that described<br />
by Sano et al (1984). Our results revealed the <strong>in</strong>trogression<br />
of small fragments from the O. glaberrima parent.<br />
Thus, the <strong>in</strong>terspecific l<strong>in</strong>es can be used to develop nearisogenic<br />
l<strong>in</strong>es necessary for determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the function of the<br />
regions <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> the phenotyp<strong>in</strong>g observation of some <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g<br />
agronomic traits, by multiple <strong>in</strong>trogression of this<br />
region <strong>in</strong> the O. sativa background.<br />
The phenotyp<strong>in</strong>g of these l<strong>in</strong>es is cont<strong>in</strong>u<strong>in</strong>g at WARDA<br />
for the identification of traits of <strong>in</strong>terest, such as number of<br />
secondary branches, number of tillers, etc.<br />
Reference<br />
Sano Y, Sano R, Morishima H. 1984. Neighbour effects between<br />
two naturally occurr<strong>in</strong>g rice species, Oryza sativa and O.<br />
glaberrima. J. Appl. Ecol. 21:245-254.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ addresses: M.-N. Ndjiondjop and M.P. Jones, WARDA/<br />
ADRAO, 01 BP2551 Bouaké, Côte d’Ivoire; J. Coburn and<br />
S. McCouch, Department of Plant Breed<strong>in</strong>g, 252 Emerson<br />
Hall, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853-1902, USA.<br />
148 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
Genetic analysis of pollen sterility loci found <strong>in</strong> hybrid<br />
progeny between Oryza sativa and O. glabberima<br />
K. Doi, K. Taguchi, and A. Yoshimura<br />
Genes caus<strong>in</strong>g hybrid pollen sterility were identified <strong>in</strong> a cross between japonica rice (Oryza sativa L. cv. Taichung 65) and<br />
African rice (O. glaberrima Steud. [Acc. 104038] from Senegal). Completely sterile F 1<br />
hybrids were observed between the two<br />
species. The hybrid pollen sterility genes were identified by quantitative trait loci (QTL) analysis and l<strong>in</strong>kage mapp<strong>in</strong>g of<br />
advanced backcross progeny. QTL analysis us<strong>in</strong>g a BC 2<br />
F 1<br />
population revealed QTLs on chromosomes 3, 7, and 10. These loci<br />
were isolated based on the genetic background of Taichung 65 through repeated backcross<strong>in</strong>g. The location of each locus on<br />
the restriction fragment length polymorphism map was determ<strong>in</strong>ed us<strong>in</strong>g BC 5<br />
F 1<br />
. Four new loci—S18, S19, S20, and S21—<br />
were mapped on chromosomes 10, 3, 7S, and 7L. Sterile pollens caused by different genes showed different morphology. This<br />
<strong>in</strong>dicates the existence of various mechanisms <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> pollen sterility. The expressed F 1<br />
sterility between Taichung 65 and<br />
O. glaberrima can be attributed to these newly identified loci.<br />
African rice, Oryza glaberrima Steud., is an endemically cultivated<br />
species <strong>in</strong> West Africa. It has characteristics different<br />
from those of O. sativa—e.g., morphology, reaction to drought,<br />
<strong>in</strong>sect resistance, and annual growth habit. However, O.<br />
glaberrima has not been exploited <strong>in</strong> rice breed<strong>in</strong>g programs.<br />
One of the reasons is the reproductive barrier between the two<br />
species. We developed a series of O. glaberrima <strong>in</strong>trogression<br />
l<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong> the background of japonica rice for genetic analysis of<br />
traits specific to the species (Doi et al 1997). Large variation<br />
<strong>in</strong> pollen sterility was observed dur<strong>in</strong>g development. Quantitative<br />
trait loci (QTL) analysis us<strong>in</strong>g the BC 2 F 1 population<br />
revealed some QTLs caus<strong>in</strong>g pollen sterility (Doi et al 1998).<br />
In our study, putative QTLs were located on the restriction<br />
fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) map us<strong>in</strong>g advanced<br />
backcross progeny. Near-isogenic l<strong>in</strong>es (NILs) were used to<br />
characterize pollen sterility loci.<br />
Materials and methods<br />
An O. glaberrima accession, IRGC 104038, from Senegal,<br />
k<strong>in</strong>dly supplied by the <strong>International</strong> <strong>Rice</strong> Germplasm Center<br />
of the <strong>International</strong> <strong>Rice</strong> Research Institute, Los Baños, Philipp<strong>in</strong>es,<br />
was used as a donor parent. A japonica rice variety,<br />
O. sativa cv. Taichung 65, was used as a recurrent parent. S<strong>in</strong>ce<br />
Taichung 65 was used as a female parent <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>itial cross,<br />
all the progeny carried cytoplasm from Taichung 65. Further<br />
backcross<strong>in</strong>g with Taichung 65 as a male parent was cont<strong>in</strong>ued<br />
after QTL analysis <strong>in</strong> the BC 2 F 1 population (Doi et al<br />
1998). BC 4 F 1 plants heterozygous for a putative QTL region<br />
and homozygous for the Taichung 65 allele <strong>in</strong> the other QTL<br />
regions (i.e., those carry<strong>in</strong>g only one QTL among the detected<br />
QTLs) were selected us<strong>in</strong>g RFLP markers. The selected plants<br />
were backcrossed with Taichung 65 pollen. Result<strong>in</strong>g backcross<br />
populations (BC 5 F 1 ) were used for l<strong>in</strong>kage mapp<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
From these populations, heterozygotes for sterility loci were<br />
selected (hereafter referred to as heterozygous NILs). These<br />
NILs were used as male parents and crossed to Taichung 65<br />
NILs carry<strong>in</strong>g recessive genetic markers, chl10 (T65chl10) or<br />
dl (T65dl). Pollen fertility of the derived F 1 plants was exam<strong>in</strong>ed.<br />
One to 2 days before anthesis, spikelets were collected<br />
and stored <strong>in</strong> 70% ethanol. Pollen fertility was estimated as<br />
the percentage of pollen gra<strong>in</strong>s that could be sta<strong>in</strong>ed by the I 2 -<br />
KI solution.<br />
Results and discussion<br />
All of the mapp<strong>in</strong>g populations, except 98DS-13, clearly segregated<br />
<strong>in</strong>to a monogenic 1:1 ratio for pollen sterile/semisterile<br />
and normal plants (Table 1). 98DS-13 showed three types of<br />
segregants: 28 sterile (
Table 1. Segregation of pollen sterility <strong>in</strong> BC 5 F 1 mapp<strong>in</strong>g populations.<br />
Number of plants<br />
Population Genes RFLP markers Total<br />
(chromosome) (chromosome) Sterile Semisterile Fertile<br />
(
these new loci s<strong>in</strong>ce the location of S2 and Rfj was unknown<br />
and the previous experiments used different cross comb<strong>in</strong>ations.<br />
The QTL analysis <strong>in</strong> the BC 2 F 1 (Doi et al 1998) accurately<br />
detected these loci. The NILs make it possible to characterize<br />
the detected loci. A major portion of F 1 pollen sterility<br />
between japonica rice and O. glaberrima could be attributed<br />
to the loci identified <strong>in</strong> our study. The NILs produced<br />
will be used for further characterization of sterility loci and <strong>in</strong><br />
positional clon<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>in</strong>volved genes.<br />
References<br />
Doi K, Iwata N, Yoshimura A. 1997. The construction of chromosome<br />
substitution l<strong>in</strong>es of African rice (Oryza glaberrima<br />
Steud.) <strong>in</strong> the background of Japonica rice (O. sativa L.). <strong>Rice</strong><br />
Genet. Newsl. 14:39-41.<br />
Doi K, Yoshimura A, Iwata N. 1998. RFLP mapp<strong>in</strong>g and QTL analysis<br />
of head<strong>in</strong>g date and pollen sterility us<strong>in</strong>g backcross populations<br />
between Oryza sativa L. and Oryza glaberrima Steud.<br />
Breed. Sci. 48:395-399.<br />
Sano Y. 1986. Sterility barriers between Oryza sativa and O.<br />
glaberrima. In: <strong>Rice</strong> genetics. Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs of the <strong>International</strong><br />
<strong>Rice</strong> <strong>Genetics</strong> Symposium, 27-31 May 1985, Los Baños, Philipp<strong>in</strong>es.<br />
Manila (Philipp<strong>in</strong>es): <strong>International</strong> <strong>Rice</strong> Research Institute.<br />
p 109-118.<br />
Yabuno T. 1977. Genetic studies on the <strong>in</strong>terspecific cytoplasm substitution<br />
l<strong>in</strong>es of japonica varieties of Oryza sativa L. and O.<br />
glaberrima Steud. Euphytica 26:451-463.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ address: Plant Breed<strong>in</strong>g Laboratory, Faculty of Agriculture,<br />
Kyushu University, Fukouka 812-8581, Japan.<br />
Acknowledgments: This study was supported <strong>in</strong> part by the Program<br />
for Promotion of Basic Research Activities for Innovative<br />
Biosciences. The authors are grateful to Drs. G.S. Khush and<br />
E.A. Angeles, <strong>IRRI</strong>, Philipp<strong>in</strong>es, who k<strong>in</strong>dly planted the mapp<strong>in</strong>g<br />
population.<br />
A rhizomatous <strong>in</strong>dividual obta<strong>in</strong>ed from <strong>in</strong>terspecific BC 1<br />
F 1<br />
progenies between Oryza sativa and O. longistam<strong>in</strong>ata<br />
D. Tao, F. Hu, Y. Yang, P. Xu, J. Li, E. Sacks, K.L. McNally, and P. Sripichitt<br />
Rhizome propagation would be a most useful method for breed<strong>in</strong>g perennial rice genotypes. Some of the wild species—Oryza<br />
longistam<strong>in</strong>ata, O. offic<strong>in</strong>alis, O. rhizomatis, and O. australiensis—are logical sources of perenniality. Among them, only O.<br />
longistam<strong>in</strong>ata has an AA genome like O. sativa. When RD23, an <strong>in</strong>dica cultivar from Thailand, was poll<strong>in</strong>ated by O. longistam<strong>in</strong>ata,<br />
one hybrid plant was obta<strong>in</strong>ed through embryo rescue. The <strong>in</strong>terspecific hybrid had strong rhizome expression and showed<br />
32.53% pollen fertility. When the hybrid was poll<strong>in</strong>ated by RD23, 162 BC 1<br />
F 1<br />
plants were obta<strong>in</strong>ed, among which only one<br />
<strong>in</strong>dividual had rhizomes like the F 1<br />
hybrid.<br />
Some rice species are entirely or predom<strong>in</strong>antly perennial,<br />
whereas others are annual. Perennial species <strong>in</strong>clude Oryza<br />
rufipogon, O. glumaepatula, O. eich<strong>in</strong>geri, O. latifolia, O. alta,<br />
O. grandiglumis, O. longiglumis, O. meyeriana, and O.<br />
granulata. In contrast, O. sativa, O. nivara, O. meridionalis,<br />
O. glaberrima, O. barthii, and O. punctata are annuals.<br />
Tiller<strong>in</strong>g is a vegetative propagation trait common to all species,<br />
perennial and annual, with<strong>in</strong> the genus Oryza. Several<br />
patterns of vegetative propagation that occur <strong>in</strong> the genus Oryza<br />
could be useful <strong>in</strong> develop<strong>in</strong>g perennial rice. Tiller separation<br />
<strong>in</strong> the perennial species O. glumaepatula is expressed under<br />
certa<strong>in</strong> environmental conditions (Oka and Morishima 1967)<br />
and could be used as a pattern of vegetative propagation. Stem<br />
regeneration, <strong>in</strong>dicated by ratoon<strong>in</strong>g, stubble plant<strong>in</strong>g, or<br />
stoloniferous growth, is also common among Oryza spp., especially<br />
perennial species of the AA genome (Oka and<br />
Morishima 1967). Rhizome production, which contributes to<br />
perenniality and adaptation to temporal drought (Vaughan<br />
1990, 1994), is commonly found <strong>in</strong> O. australiensis, O.<br />
longistam<strong>in</strong>ata, O. offic<strong>in</strong>alis, and O. rhizomatis.<br />
Rhizome production is the most logical pattern of propagation<br />
to breed for perennial rice, especially upland rice. The<br />
development of perennial rice, especially perennial hybrid rice,<br />
has the potential to provide environment-friendly and economically<br />
viable alternatives for use on land where annual production<br />
is not susta<strong>in</strong>able (Wagoner 1990). To breed for rice ratoon<strong>in</strong>g<br />
and stubble cropp<strong>in</strong>g, O. rufipogon would be the most<br />
logical candidate; but to breed for perennial rice, O.<br />
longistam<strong>in</strong>ata, O. rhizomatis, O. offic<strong>in</strong>alis, and O.<br />
australiensis may be better donors of perenniality. O.<br />
longistam<strong>in</strong>ata has the same genome, AA, as O. sativa, and<br />
therefore would be the better donor of genes for rhizome expression.<br />
This paper reports prelim<strong>in</strong>ary results on the transfer<br />
of rhizomes from O. longistam<strong>in</strong>ata to cultivated rice <strong>in</strong><br />
order to breed for perennial rice.<br />
Genetic diversity, evolution, and alien <strong>in</strong>trogression 151
Materials and methods<br />
Oryza longistam<strong>in</strong>ata was collected from Niger and supplied<br />
by Dr. Hiroshi Hyakutake, of the M<strong>in</strong>istry of Agriculture and<br />
Forestry, Japan. The F 1 hybrid of RD23/O. longistam<strong>in</strong>ata was<br />
produced at Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand, <strong>in</strong> 1996<br />
by direct hybridization and embryo rescue (Tao and Sripichitt<br />
2000). RD23 is an <strong>in</strong>dica cultivar from Thailand. The F 1 hybrid<br />
had 32.53% pollen fertility, <strong>in</strong>dehiscent anthers, and rhizomes<br />
that were <strong>in</strong>termediate between the two parents.<br />
Dur<strong>in</strong>g 1999, <strong>in</strong> Sanya, Ha<strong>in</strong>an, Ch<strong>in</strong>a, the F 1 hybrid of<br />
RD23/O. longistam<strong>in</strong>ata was poll<strong>in</strong>ated by RD23, and normally<br />
developed seeds were germ<strong>in</strong>ated on 1/4 MS medium<br />
(3% sucrose + 0.7% agar, pH 5.8). Plantlets were transplanted<br />
<strong>in</strong> the field <strong>in</strong> Sanya.<br />
Results and discussion<br />
After poll<strong>in</strong>ation by RD23, 168 normally developed BC 1 seeds<br />
were obta<strong>in</strong>ed. Us<strong>in</strong>g aseptic culture conditions, 162 plants<br />
were obta<strong>in</strong>ed and transplanted to an irrigated field. Among<br />
the backcross progenies, only one <strong>in</strong>dividual had rhizomes like<br />
the F 1 . This is the first report of a rhizomatous BC 1 F 1 when O.<br />
sativa was used as a recurrent parent. Ghesquiere (1991) and<br />
Ghesquiere and Causse (1992) reported unilateral <strong>in</strong>heritance<br />
of the rhizomatous trait <strong>in</strong> crosses of O. longistam<strong>in</strong>ata/O.<br />
sativa, and thought that (1) one of two complementary lethal<br />
genes, D1 located on chromosome 2, was closely l<strong>in</strong>ked to a<br />
rhizomatous gene, or that both traits were controlled by the<br />
same gene. Through l<strong>in</strong>kage to molecular markers, Ghesquiere<br />
(1991) and Ghesquiere and Causse (1992) found that the other<br />
complementary lethal gene, D2 from O. sativa, was located<br />
on chromosome 11.<br />
However, data from an F 2 population of C105204/<br />
Taichung 65 allowed Maekawa et al (1998) to f<strong>in</strong>d that a dom<strong>in</strong>ant<br />
gene (Rhz) for the presence or absence of rhizomes was<br />
located on chromosome 4. The low spikelet fertility (16.6%)<br />
of the F 1 did not disturb segregation of the l<strong>in</strong>ked traits,<br />
liguleless and rhizomatous. The degree of rhizome expression<br />
among F 2 was variable, <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g that other genes <strong>in</strong> addition<br />
to Rhz affected the trait.<br />
Like the C105204/Taichung 65 F 1 observed by Maekawa<br />
et al (1998), the RD23/O. longistam<strong>in</strong>ata F 1 produced rhizomes,<br />
<strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g dom<strong>in</strong>ant gene control for the presence of<br />
rhizomes. However, the <strong>in</strong>termediate rhizome size of the F 1 s<br />
<strong>in</strong>dicated that other genes affected rhizome expression. In contrast<br />
to the simple segregation of the C105204/Taichung 65<br />
F 2 , the RD23/O. longistam<strong>in</strong>ata//RD23 population produced<br />
only one rhizomatous <strong>in</strong>dividual out of 162 BC 1 F 1 progenies.<br />
The limited occurrence of rhizome expression <strong>in</strong> RD23/O.<br />
longistam<strong>in</strong>ata//RD23 suggests that genes epistatic to Rhz affected<br />
rhizome expression <strong>in</strong> this population. Thus, <strong>in</strong> the<br />
RD23/O. longistam<strong>in</strong>ata//RD23 population, rhizome expression<br />
was likely controlled by several quantitative loci with<br />
dosage effects. These observations on rhizome expression for<br />
<strong>in</strong>terspecific progenies of O. sativa and O. longistam<strong>in</strong>ata are<br />
consistent with observations of <strong>in</strong>terspecific crosses <strong>in</strong> sorghum<br />
(Piper and Kulakow 1994, Yim and Bayer 1997).<br />
References<br />
Ghesquiere A. 1991. Reexam<strong>in</strong>ation of genetic control of the reproductive<br />
barrier between Oryza longistam<strong>in</strong>ata and O. sativa<br />
and relationship to rhizome expression. In: <strong>Rice</strong> genetics II.<br />
Manila (Philipp<strong>in</strong>es): <strong>International</strong> <strong>Rice</strong> Research Institute.<br />
p 729-730.<br />
Ghesquiere A, Causse M. 1992. L<strong>in</strong>kage study between molecular<br />
markers and genes controll<strong>in</strong>g the reproductive barrier <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>terspecific<br />
backcross between O. sativa and O. longistam<strong>in</strong>ata.<br />
<strong>Rice</strong> Genet. Newsl. 9:28-31.<br />
Maekawa M, Inukai T, Rikiishi K, Matsuura T, Noda K. 1998. Inheritance<br />
of the rhizomatous trait <strong>in</strong> hybrids of Oryza<br />
longistam<strong>in</strong>ata Chev. et Roehr. and O. sativa L. SABRAO J.<br />
30(2):69-72.<br />
Oka HI, Morishima H. 1967. Variations <strong>in</strong> the breed<strong>in</strong>g systems of a<br />
wild rice, Oryza perennis. Evolution 21:249-258.<br />
Piper JK, Kulakow PA. 1994. Seed yield and biomass allocation <strong>in</strong><br />
Sorghum bicolor and F 1 and backcross generations of S. bicolor<br />
× S. haplense hybrids. Can. J. Bot. 72:468-474.<br />
Tao D, Sripichitt P. 2000. Prelim<strong>in</strong>ary report on transfer traits of<br />
vegetative propagation from wild rices to O. sativa via distant<br />
hybridization and embryo rescue. Kasetsart J. (Nat. Sci.) 34:1-<br />
11.<br />
Vaughan DA. 1990. A new rhizomatous Oryza species (Poaceae)<br />
from Sri Lanka. Bot. J. L<strong>in</strong>n. Soc. 103:159-163.<br />
Vaughan DA. 1994. The wild relatives of rice. Manila (Philipp<strong>in</strong>es):<br />
<strong>International</strong> <strong>Rice</strong> Research Institute. 137 p.<br />
Wagoner P. 1990. Perennial gra<strong>in</strong> development: past efforts and potential<br />
for the future. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 9:381-408.<br />
Yim K, Bayer DE. 1997. Rhizome expression <strong>in</strong> a selected cross <strong>in</strong><br />
the Sorghum genus. Euphytica 94:253-256.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ addresses: D. Tao, F. Hu, Y. Yang, P. Xu, J. Li, Food Crops<br />
Research Institute, Yunnan Academy of Agricultural Sciences,<br />
Kunm<strong>in</strong>g 650205, Ch<strong>in</strong>a; E. Sacks, K.L. McNally, <strong>International</strong><br />
<strong>Rice</strong> Research Institute, Philipp<strong>in</strong>es; P. Sripichitt, Department<br />
of Agronomy, Kasetsart University, Bangkok 10900,<br />
Thailand.<br />
Acknowledgment: F<strong>in</strong>ancial support from the Yunnan Agricultural<br />
Department and Bundesm<strong>in</strong>isterium für Wirtschaftliche<br />
Zusammenarbeit und Entwicklung (BMZ) is gratefully acknowledged.<br />
152 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
Identify<strong>in</strong>g late head<strong>in</strong>g genes <strong>in</strong> rice us<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Oryza glumaepatula <strong>in</strong>trogression l<strong>in</strong>es<br />
P.L. Sanchez, Sobrizal, K. Ikeda, H. Yasui, and A. Yoshimura<br />
A backcross population (BC 4<br />
F 2<br />
) was developed from a cross between japonica rice variety Taichung 65, used as a recurrent<br />
parent, and the wild species Oryza glumaepatula, used as a donor parent. BC 4<br />
F 2<br />
254 (n = 72) and BC 4<br />
F 2<br />
222 (n = 78)<br />
populations varied widely <strong>in</strong> days to head<strong>in</strong>g. The number of days to head<strong>in</strong>g of Taichung 65 ranged from 95 to 100, whereas<br />
BC 4<br />
F 2<br />
254 and BC 4<br />
F 2<br />
222 ranged from 95 to 114 d and 95 to 111 d, respectively. Us<strong>in</strong>g l<strong>in</strong>kage analysis, we found two late<br />
head<strong>in</strong>g genes, Lhd1(t) <strong>in</strong> BC 4<br />
F 2<br />
254 and Lhd2(t) <strong>in</strong> BC 4<br />
F 2<br />
222. The Lhd1(t) gene was located between RFLP markers C474<br />
and R1962 on chromosome 6; it was l<strong>in</strong>ked to C474 and R1962, with a map distance of 1.4 and 1.5 cM, respectively. Lhd2(t)<br />
was located between RFLP markers G338 and R1440 on chromosome 7; it was l<strong>in</strong>ked to G338 and R1440, with a map<br />
distance of 1.3 and 1.3 cM, respectively. Lhd1(t) showed a good correspondence with that of EnSe1(t) and Hd3b, whereas the<br />
position of Lhd2(t) on chromosome 7 might be identical to the region of the previously reported gene E1 and QTL Hd4. Both<br />
the Lhd1(t) and Lhd2(t) genes resulted <strong>in</strong> late flower<strong>in</strong>g under natural daylength conditions dur<strong>in</strong>g May to September <strong>in</strong><br />
Fukuoka, Japan. The dom<strong>in</strong>ant allele of O. glumaepatula at Lhd1(t) and the partially dom<strong>in</strong>ant allele of O. glumaepatula at<br />
Lhd2(t) were responsible for the delayed head<strong>in</strong>g. The l<strong>in</strong>ked markers could be used for the isolation of late head<strong>in</strong>g genes<br />
through map-based clon<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
Days to head<strong>in</strong>g is an important agronomic trait of rice because<br />
it is highly associated with the regional and seasonal<br />
adaptability of rice cultivars. The development of molecular<br />
markers made possible the detection and identification of <strong>in</strong>dividual<br />
genetic factors controll<strong>in</strong>g days to head<strong>in</strong>g. Chromosomal<br />
locations of major genes affect<strong>in</strong>g this trait have been<br />
identified us<strong>in</strong>g molecular markers (Yano et al 1997, Yamamoto<br />
et al 1998, Doi et al 1998).<br />
The wild rice, Oryza glumaepatula, is a potential source<br />
of new and valuable genes for days to head<strong>in</strong>g. O. glumaepatula<br />
can be easily crossed with Oryza sativa and genes from this<br />
species can be <strong>in</strong>troduced to cultivated rice by conventional<br />
cross<strong>in</strong>g and backcross<strong>in</strong>g procedures. Hence, this study aimed<br />
at identify<strong>in</strong>g genes controll<strong>in</strong>g days to head<strong>in</strong>g us<strong>in</strong>g the O.<br />
glumaepatula <strong>in</strong>trogression l<strong>in</strong>es (glumILs) developed <strong>in</strong> a<br />
previous study (Sobrizal et al 1999). The identification of new<br />
genes could provide a new means for manipulat<strong>in</strong>g flower<strong>in</strong>g<br />
time <strong>in</strong> rice.<br />
Materials and methods<br />
Oryza glumaepatula (IRGC Acc. No. 105668) collected <strong>in</strong><br />
Brazil was crossed as the nuclear donor parent with Taichung<br />
65 (TC65), a cultivated japonica rice variety as the cytoplasm<br />
donor and recurrent parent (Sobrizal et al 1999). Cross<strong>in</strong>g was<br />
performed until BC 4 F 2 populations were obta<strong>in</strong>ed. Two BC 4 F 2<br />
populations—BC 4 F 2 254 and BC 4 F 2 222—exhibit<strong>in</strong>g wide<br />
variation <strong>in</strong> days to head<strong>in</strong>g were selected and planted <strong>in</strong> 1999<br />
under natural daylength condition <strong>in</strong> a paddy field at the Kyushu<br />
University Experiment Station, Japan.<br />
Each l<strong>in</strong>e was monitored for the appearance of the first<br />
panicle, which constitutes days to head<strong>in</strong>g. The number of days<br />
to head<strong>in</strong>g was expressed as the number of days from sow<strong>in</strong>g<br />
to head<strong>in</strong>g. Eight leaves (about 10 g) were collected from each<br />
l<strong>in</strong>e after monitor<strong>in</strong>g the head<strong>in</strong>g date for DNA extraction.<br />
DNA was extracted from fresh leaves of BC 4 F 2 plants<br />
us<strong>in</strong>g the cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) method.<br />
DNA digestion, electrophoresis, and Southern blott<strong>in</strong>g were<br />
performed accord<strong>in</strong>g to the methods described by Tsunematsu<br />
et al (1996b). One hundred six restriction fragment length polymorphism<br />
(RFLP) markers were surveyed and used for l<strong>in</strong>kage<br />
map construction.<br />
DNA clones for hybridization were selected on the basis<br />
of the exist<strong>in</strong>g RFLP l<strong>in</strong>kage map. DNA hybridization and<br />
detection of chemilum<strong>in</strong>escence on X-ray film were carried<br />
out us<strong>in</strong>g the enhanced chemilum<strong>in</strong>escence (ECL) direct label<strong>in</strong>g<br />
and detection system (Amersham). A polymorphism<br />
survey was conducted <strong>in</strong> the BC 3 F 1 and reta<strong>in</strong>ed heterozygous<br />
regions were further evaluated <strong>in</strong> the BC 4 F 1 generation.<br />
Recomb<strong>in</strong>ation values were estimated follow<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
maximum likelihood equation and converted <strong>in</strong>to genetic distances<br />
(cM) us<strong>in</strong>g Kosambi function.<br />
Results<br />
BC 4<br />
F 2<br />
254<br />
The frequency distribution for days to head<strong>in</strong>g of selected<br />
BC 4 F 2 254 populations (n = 72) is bimodal. Days to head<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>in</strong> TC65 ranged from 95 to 100, while that of BC 4 F 2 254 ranged<br />
from 95 to 114. Individuals were classified <strong>in</strong>to two groups:<br />
20 <strong>in</strong>dividuals for early head<strong>in</strong>g and 52 <strong>in</strong>dividuals for late<br />
head<strong>in</strong>g. O. glumaepatula did not flower dur<strong>in</strong>g the entire<br />
grow<strong>in</strong>g season under natural daylength conditions; hence, no<br />
data were obta<strong>in</strong>ed. The population segregated <strong>in</strong>to a 1 early:3<br />
late ratio, <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g a s<strong>in</strong>gle dom<strong>in</strong>ant gene controll<strong>in</strong>g head<strong>in</strong>g<br />
date (χ 2 = 0.30).<br />
Genetic diversity, evolution, and alien <strong>in</strong>trogression 153
Results of l<strong>in</strong>kage analysis (n = 70) suggested that the<br />
gene controll<strong>in</strong>g days to head<strong>in</strong>g was located between C474<br />
and R1962 on chromosome 6. The gene was l<strong>in</strong>ked to C474<br />
and R1962, with a map distance of 1.4 and 1.5 cM, respectively.<br />
We designated this late head<strong>in</strong>g gene as Lhd1(t).<br />
BC 4<br />
F 2<br />
222<br />
A bimodal frequency distribution of days to head<strong>in</strong>g was also<br />
observed from BC 4 F 2 222 (n = 78). Days to head<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> BC 4 F 2<br />
222 ranged from 94 to 111. Individuals were classified accord<strong>in</strong>g<br />
to two head<strong>in</strong>g dates: 23 <strong>in</strong>dividuals for early head<strong>in</strong>g<br />
and 55 <strong>in</strong>dividuals for late head<strong>in</strong>g. The chi-square test revealed<br />
that this population also segregated <strong>in</strong>to a 1 early:3 late<br />
ratio, fitt<strong>in</strong>g the Mendelian ratio for a s<strong>in</strong>gle dom<strong>in</strong>ant gene<br />
(χ 2 = 0.84). The gene controll<strong>in</strong>g days to head<strong>in</strong>g was located<br />
between G338 and R1440 on chromosome 7. The gene was<br />
l<strong>in</strong>ked to G338 and R1440, with a map distance of 1.3 and 1.3<br />
cM, respectively. We designated this late head<strong>in</strong>g gene as<br />
Lhd2(t).<br />
Discussion<br />
We identified two genes responsible for late head<strong>in</strong>g, Lhd1(t)<br />
and Lhd2(t). The gene Lhd1(t) was located on chromosome 6<br />
and showed a good correspondence to the photoperiod sensitivity<br />
genes EnSe1(t) (Sano 1992) and Hd3b (Yano et al 1997),<br />
whereas the position of Lhd2(t) on chromosome 7 might be<br />
identical to the region of the previously reported gene E1<br />
(Okumoto et al 1992) and QTL Hd4 (Yano et al 1997). Lhd1(t)<br />
and Lhd2(t) genes were responsible for the delayed head<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><br />
glumILs under natural daylength conditions dur<strong>in</strong>g May to<br />
September <strong>in</strong> Fukuoka, Japan.<br />
The O. glumaepatula we planted <strong>in</strong> the field did not<br />
flower but the glumILs did. The flower<strong>in</strong>g date of glumILs<br />
exhibited transgressive segregation. Some plants flowered earlier<br />
than Taichung 65 while other plants flowered very late.<br />
The failure of O. glumaepatula to flower under natural<br />
daylength conditions could <strong>in</strong>dicate that it is a photoperiodsensitive<br />
plant. Hence, we are currently conduct<strong>in</strong>g short- and<br />
long-day treatments to test our hypothesis.<br />
The dom<strong>in</strong>ant and partially dom<strong>in</strong>ant alleles of O.<br />
glumaepatula at the Lhd1(t) and Lhd2(t) genes expla<strong>in</strong>ed the<br />
wide variation <strong>in</strong> days to head<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> BC 4 F 2 populations. The<br />
identification of genes responsible for late head<strong>in</strong>g should lead<br />
to a better understand<strong>in</strong>g of this phenomenon. Us<strong>in</strong>g these<br />
genes, days to head<strong>in</strong>g may be altered; hence, rice maturity<br />
could be manipulated to meet the specific rice maturity requirements<br />
of local conditions. The RFLP markers l<strong>in</strong>ked to<br />
Lhd1(t) and Lhd2(t) genes could be used for the isolation of<br />
late head<strong>in</strong>g genes through map-based clon<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
References<br />
Doi K, Yoshimura A, Iwata N. 1998. RFLP mapp<strong>in</strong>g and QTL analysis<br />
of head<strong>in</strong>g date and pollen sterility us<strong>in</strong>g backcross populations<br />
between Oryza sativa L. and Oryza glaberrima Steud.<br />
Breed. Sci. 48:395-399.<br />
Okumoto Y, Yoshimura A, Tanisaka T, Yamagata H. 1992. Analysis<br />
of a rice variety Taichung 65 and its isogenic early head<strong>in</strong>g<br />
l<strong>in</strong>es and late-head<strong>in</strong>g genes E1, E2 and E3. Jpn. J. Breed.<br />
42:415-429. (In Japanese.)<br />
Sano Y. 1992. Genetic comparisons of chromosome 6 between wild<br />
and cultivated rice. Jpn. J. Breed. 42:561-572.<br />
Sobrizal, Ikeda K, Sanchez PL, Doi K, Angeles ER, Khush GS,<br />
Yoshimura A. 1999. Development of Oryza glumaepatula<br />
<strong>in</strong>trogression l<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong> rice, O. sativa L. <strong>Rice</strong> Genet. Newsl.<br />
16:107-108.<br />
Yamamoto T, Kuboki Y, L<strong>in</strong> SY, Sasaki T, Yano M. 1998. F<strong>in</strong>e mapp<strong>in</strong>g<br />
of quantitative trait loci Hd1, Hd2, and Hd3 controll<strong>in</strong>g<br />
head<strong>in</strong>g date of rice, as s<strong>in</strong>gle Mendelian factors. Theor. Appl.<br />
Genet. 97:37-44.<br />
Yano M, Harushima Y, Nagamura Y, Kurata N, M<strong>in</strong>obe Y, Sasaki T.<br />
1997. Identification of quantitative trait loci controll<strong>in</strong>g head<strong>in</strong>g<br />
date <strong>in</strong> rice us<strong>in</strong>g a high-density l<strong>in</strong>kage map. Theor. Appl.<br />
Genet. 95:1025-1032.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ address: Plant Breed<strong>in</strong>g Laboratory, Faculty of Agriculture,<br />
Kyushu University, Fukuoka 812-8581, Japan.<br />
Genetic variability of tolerance for iron toxicity<br />
<strong>in</strong> different species of Oryza and their derivatives<br />
R.D. Mendoza, J.A. Moliñawe, G.B. Gregorio, C.Q. Guerta, and D.S. Brar<br />
Iron toxicity is a major constra<strong>in</strong>t <strong>in</strong> rice production <strong>in</strong> acid lowland soils with moderate to high amounts of organic matter and<br />
reactive iron. Breed<strong>in</strong>g rice with tolerance for iron toxicity requires a good source of tolerance and a rapid and reliable screen<strong>in</strong>g<br />
technique. Wild species of Oryza are an important source of useful genes for broaden<strong>in</strong>g the gene pool of rice with tolerance<br />
for abiotic and biotic stresses. Us<strong>in</strong>g seedl<strong>in</strong>g-stage screen<strong>in</strong>g procedures, 161 genotypes represent<strong>in</strong>g 24 improved and<br />
traditional varieties of O. sativa, 18 O. glaberrima, 10 O. rufipogon, 13 O. sativa × O. rufipogon derivatives, and 96 O. sativa ×<br />
O. glaberrima derivatives were screened. Advanced progenies were screened <strong>in</strong> 300-ppm and 400-ppm iron concentrations<br />
under controlled conditions <strong>in</strong> the phytotron. A wide range of variability <strong>in</strong> iron toxicity tolerance was observed <strong>in</strong> wild species<br />
154 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
as well as <strong>in</strong> their derivatives. Seven genotypes of O. sativa and three accessions from O. rufipogon showed tolerance <strong>in</strong> 400-<br />
ppm concentration, whereas none of the accessions from O. glaberrima species was tolerant. Varieties BW267-3, Suakoko 8,<br />
IR9884, IR68544-29-2-1-3-1-2, and Azucena showed good levels of tolerance at 400-ppm iron concentration. Three O.<br />
rufipogon accessions, 105909, 106412, and 106423, were found to be highly tolerant, and these could be good donors for<br />
tolerance for iron toxicity. Some of the derivatives of O. sativa × O. glaberrima were found to have better tolerance for iron<br />
toxicity than both parents. Most of the advanced progenies derived from O. sativa × O. rufipogon screened at 400-ppm iron<br />
concentration showed tolerance to moderate tolerance.<br />
Iron toxicity <strong>in</strong> acid lowland soil is the second major stress<br />
that limits rice yields (Ponnamperuma et al 1973). It is a nutritional<br />
disorder associated with excess water-soluble iron. Low<br />
yields <strong>in</strong> iron-toxic fields are due to premature death of plants<br />
or to a high percentage of unfilled gra<strong>in</strong>s. <strong>Rice</strong> affected with<br />
iron toxicity shows yellow<strong>in</strong>g or “bronz<strong>in</strong>g” of leaves, stunted<br />
growth, and scanty and coarse dark brown roots, ultimately<br />
result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> plant death or high sterility.<br />
Information on genetic variability related to iron toxicity<br />
tolerance <strong>in</strong> rice is limited (Taengsuwan 1998). Wild rice<br />
varieties are the major potential sources of genetic variability<br />
for biotic and abiotic stress tolerance. The evaluation and use<br />
of different species of Oryza are important <strong>in</strong> broaden<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
genetic base of modern rice varieties. The field screen<strong>in</strong>g procedure<br />
currently used often gives variable results <strong>in</strong> terms of<br />
tolerance because of stress heterogeneity <strong>in</strong> soil, variable<br />
weather, and other associated soil stress. Hence, to identify<br />
reliable donors, screen<strong>in</strong>g under controlled conditions was undertaken.<br />
Diverse germplasm, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g wild species and their<br />
derivatives, was evaluated to identify promis<strong>in</strong>g donors for<br />
tolerance of iron toxicity and to identify alien genes<br />
<strong>in</strong>trogressed <strong>in</strong>to rice.<br />
Materials and methods<br />
The experimental materials comprised 24 O. sativa (<strong>in</strong>dica)<br />
varieties, 18 accessions of O. glaberrima, 10 accessions of O.<br />
rufipogon, and advanced progenies of IR64 × O. rufipogon<br />
acc. 106424 (12), IR74 × O. rufipogon acc. 106424, IR64 ×<br />
O. glaberrima (30), and BG90-2 × O. glaberrima (66). These<br />
materials were screened for iron toxicity tolerance at two levels<br />
(300 ppm and 400 pmm) <strong>in</strong> nutrient solution us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>IRRI</strong>’s<br />
protocol. O. rufipogon accessions and the O. sativa × O.<br />
glaberrima progenies were screened only <strong>in</strong> a solution with<br />
400-ppm iron concentration. Pregerm<strong>in</strong>ated seeds of all the<br />
entries were sown on nylon nets float<strong>in</strong>g on distilled water for<br />
the first 3 d. On the fourth day, stress was imposed by replac<strong>in</strong>g<br />
water with iron-rich Yoshida culture solution us<strong>in</strong>g ferrous<br />
sulfate. The pH of the solution was adjusted to 4.0 twice a day<br />
to ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> its acid condition. This iron-rich solution was refreshed<br />
every week. After 4 wk, plants were evaluated based<br />
on the <strong>IRRI</strong> Standard evaluation system (<strong>IRRI</strong> 1996) of plant<br />
scor<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
The experiment was conducted <strong>in</strong> two replications and<br />
was done three times to m<strong>in</strong>imize experimental error. In the<br />
second experiment, 11 varieties, which were known for their<br />
tolerance and susceptibility under iron-toxic conditions, were<br />
screened under field and hydroponic conditions (400-ppm iron<br />
concentration). Iron uptake <strong>in</strong> these 11 genotypes was also<br />
analyzed to understand the mechanism of tolerance.<br />
Results and discussion<br />
In the <strong>in</strong>itial study, accuracy and reproducibility of the results<br />
of the hydroponic screen<strong>in</strong>g for test varieties under 400-ppm<br />
iron concentration were consistent <strong>in</strong> their tolerance with field<br />
conditions reported earlier. The results of iron uptake and tolerance<br />
reaction test<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> culture solution agreed with field<br />
reactions for all entries except for variety Khao Dawk Mali<br />
105, which gave a highly tolerant score <strong>in</strong> solution and leaf<br />
tissue iron content but was reported to be moderately tolerant<br />
under field conditions (Table 1). The iron uptake and visual<br />
tolerance scores of all test genotypes <strong>in</strong>dicated that the tolerant<br />
varieties had less iron content <strong>in</strong> their leaf tissue, which<br />
may be due to the nature of avoidance. The results of screen<strong>in</strong>g<br />
at two levels of iron concentrations showed that many of<br />
the entries that were tolerant at 300 ppm were susceptible at<br />
the 400-ppm toxicity level (Table 2). Therefore, <strong>in</strong> screen<strong>in</strong>g<br />
for potential and stable donors, 400-ppm iron concentration <strong>in</strong><br />
nutrient solution would be the most reliable.<br />
Of 28 <strong>in</strong>dica varieties screened, 7 were tolerant <strong>in</strong> 400-<br />
ppm concentration, with an average score of
Table 1. Mean iron uptake and visual score of some cultivated rice<br />
varieties tested <strong>in</strong> nutrient solution with 400-ppm iron level. a<br />
Tolerance Iron uptake Visual<br />
Variety level (mg/kg) score b<br />
(<strong>IRRI</strong> SES)<br />
Khao Daeng Tolerant 509 4.2<br />
Khao Tah Petch Tolerant 422 3.5<br />
Khao Bannah Tolerant 394 3.3<br />
Khao Dawk Mali 105 Moderately tolerant 226 2.2<br />
Leuang Pratew 123 Moderately tolerant 710 6.3<br />
Plai Ngahm Prach<strong>in</strong>buri Moderately tolerant 736 6.3<br />
Huntra 60 Susceptible 852 7.0<br />
IR11141-6-1-4 Susceptible 1,144 8.0<br />
IR45 Susceptible 832 7.1<br />
IR74 (tolerant check) 401 3.0<br />
IR63262 (susceptible<br />
check) 1,188 8.0<br />
Thirty advanced progenies of IR64 × O. glaberrima (different<br />
accessions) were screened; seven entries (IR75871-4-<br />
B-4-1, IR75079-1-5-4-7-1, IR75079-1-5-4-7-2, IR75079-1-5-<br />
4-7-3, IR75871-4-29-4-3, IR75871-4-29-4-4, and IR75865-<br />
7-7-16-2) showed a good level of tolerance though their parents<br />
were susceptible, which <strong>in</strong>dicated that gene <strong>in</strong>teraction<br />
could be important for iron toxicity tolerance. In the progenies<br />
derived from cross<strong>in</strong>g tolerant and susceptible parents, BG90-<br />
2 × O. glaberrima, the frequency of tolerant genotypes was<br />
less (14 out of 66 entries). The progenies that were observed<br />
to have a good level of tolerance were IR75100-1-25-5-1-2,<br />
IR75100-1-25-5-1-3, IR75100-1-25-5-1-4, IR75100-1-25-5-<br />
1-6, IR75912-6-5-8-1, IR75912-6-5-8-2, and OG4831-4. The<br />
distribution pattern of tolerant, moderately tolerant, and susceptible<br />
progenies of susceptible × susceptible and tolerant ×<br />
susceptible crosses <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g O. sativa × O. glaberrima species<br />
suggests <strong>in</strong>terallelic <strong>in</strong>teraction for iron toxicity tolerance.<br />
A wide range of variability to iron toxicity tolerance was<br />
observed among rice germplasm of different species. Different<br />
degrees of leaf “bronz<strong>in</strong>g” were expressed us<strong>in</strong>g a nutrient<br />
culture solution technique under controlled conditions. O.<br />
rufipogon would be a good potential genetic donor for tolerance<br />
for iron toxicity.<br />
a Adapted from PhD dissertation of Dr. S. Taengsuwan. b 1 = nearly normal growth, 9<br />
= almost all plants dead or dy<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
Table 2. Visual score of “bronz<strong>in</strong>g” <strong>in</strong> some cultivated rice, wild rice, and their derivatives grown<br />
under controlled conditions. a<br />
Species/variety 400 300 Species/variety 400 300<br />
ppm ppm ppm ppm<br />
O. sativa<br />
Azucena 3.06 2.00 TOG6508 7.38 5.50<br />
Bg 90-2 3.25 2.00 TOG6589 7.25 5.50<br />
PSBRc 18 8.39 5.30 TOG6597 6.63 5.75<br />
PSBRc 68 5.75 5.00 TOG6631 7.63 5.50<br />
PSBRc 70 4.00 2.50 TOG7235 5.88 4.25<br />
IR56 6.25 4.50 TOG7242 5.38 4.50<br />
IR64 6.29 3.13 TOG7291 6.25 4.00<br />
IR68544-29-2-1-3-1-2 2.50 2.00 O. rufipogon<br />
IR68552-55-3-2 7.50 4.00 105908 4.00<br />
IR65600-81-5-3-2 5.25 3.00 105909 3.00<br />
IR69502-6-SRN-3-UBN-1-B 6.00 3.25 105910 7.00<br />
IR55423-01 7.50 5.50 106412 3.00<br />
IR31917 6.50 3.00 106423 3.00<br />
IR68821-101-4-B1-1-B 5.75 3.00 106424 4.00<br />
IR60080-6A 3.25 2.25 IR64/O. rufipogon derivatives<br />
IR68703-AC24-1 4.25 2.00 IR73382-80-9-3-13-2-2-1-2 5.25 3.25<br />
O. glaberrima IR73382-89-9-3-13-2-2-1-3 4.00 3.00<br />
IG10 7.25 5.25 IR73382-89-9-14-14-1-3-2-3 6.00 3.75<br />
CG14 7.25 5.25 IR73382-111-9-19-19-2-3-1-2 5.75 3.75<br />
CG17 7.00 4.50 IR73382-111-9-19-19-2-3-2-2 5.25 3.00<br />
CG20 7.00 5.50 IR73384-11-7-8-3-2-3-1-1 5.00 3.00<br />
TOG5674 7.00 5.50 IR73384-11-7-8-2-3-3-3 5.75 3.00<br />
TOG5675 6.75 5.25 IR73384-8-11-16-1-2-3-3 4.00 2.00<br />
TOG5681 6.88 4.75 IR73685-18-14-22-2-3-3-2 4.75 2.25<br />
TOG5860 6.38 5.50 IR73678-8-1-3-3-2 4.75 2.00<br />
TOG6216 5.50 4.75 IR73678-13-2-1-1-2 5.75 4.00<br />
TOG6229 7.13 5.75 IR63768-13-2-1-3-2 5.00 3.75<br />
TOG6472 6.88 5.50<br />
a 1 = nearly normal growth, 9 = almost all plants dead or dy<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
156 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
References<br />
<strong>IRRI</strong> (<strong>International</strong> <strong>Rice</strong> Research Institute). 1996. Standard evaluation<br />
system for rice. Manila (Philipp<strong>in</strong>es): <strong>IRRI</strong>. 52 p.<br />
Ponnamperuma FN, Attanandana T, Beye G. 1973. Amelioration of<br />
three acid sulphate soils for lowland rice. In: Symposium on<br />
acid sulphate soils. Wagen<strong>in</strong>gen (Netherlands): <strong>International</strong><br />
Livestock Research Institute. p 391-393.<br />
Taengsuwan S. 1998. Variability and genetics of tolerance for acid<br />
sulfate soil conditions <strong>in</strong> rice. Ph.D. dissertation. University<br />
of the Philipp<strong>in</strong>es Los Baños and <strong>IRRI</strong>, Los Baños, Philipp<strong>in</strong>es.<br />
p 61-62.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ address: <strong>International</strong> <strong>Rice</strong> Research Institute, DAPO Box<br />
7777, Metro Manila, Philipp<strong>in</strong>es.<br />
Identify<strong>in</strong>g subspecies-specific DNA markers <strong>in</strong> rice<br />
J.H. Ch<strong>in</strong> and H.J. Koh<br />
Subspecies-specific random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) markers us<strong>in</strong>g 30 varieties (15 japonica, 15 <strong>in</strong>dica) of various<br />
orig<strong>in</strong> were identified. Of 266 random primers tested, 25 primers produced 31 subspecies-specific bands; 11 bands were<br />
present only <strong>in</strong> japonica, 19 bands only <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>dica, and 1 band only <strong>in</strong> Tongil-type varieties. <strong>Rice</strong> varieties were classified <strong>in</strong>to two<br />
discrete subspecies groups by subspecies-specific markers. The SPV (subspecies-prototype variety) concept was <strong>in</strong>troduced.<br />
Varieties could be classified by SPV <strong>in</strong>dex based on the genetic similarity to SPV us<strong>in</strong>g subspecies-specific markers. Breed<strong>in</strong>g<br />
l<strong>in</strong>es from crosses between Dasanbyeo (<strong>in</strong>dica) and TR22183 (japonica), and Dasanbyeo (<strong>in</strong>dica) and Seosan2 (japonica),<br />
were analyzed by selected subspecies-specific markers. All the l<strong>in</strong>es turned out to be genetically closer to the <strong>in</strong>dica parent,<br />
Dasanbyeo.<br />
S<strong>in</strong>ce DNA markers provide greater and more reliable <strong>in</strong>formation<br />
than morphological and biochemical markers, they have<br />
been used extensively for identify<strong>in</strong>g genotypes, estimat<strong>in</strong>g<br />
genetic variability, construct<strong>in</strong>g maps, and do<strong>in</strong>g map-based<br />
gene clon<strong>in</strong>g (Paterson et al 1991). Among different DNA<br />
markers, random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) markers<br />
have been frequently used for f<strong>in</strong>gerpr<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g rice varieties<br />
<strong>in</strong> Korea (Ahn et al 1996, 1998, Cho et al 1998). RAPDs seem<br />
useful for differentiat<strong>in</strong>g genotypes because polymerase cha<strong>in</strong><br />
reaction (PCR) amplification of genomic DNA us<strong>in</strong>g random<br />
primers produces highly polymorphic bands from randomly<br />
distributed primer-b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g regions of genomic DNA. In addition,<br />
RAPD analysis is simple and relatively cheap.<br />
Breed<strong>in</strong>g promis<strong>in</strong>g l<strong>in</strong>es by accumulat<strong>in</strong>g desirable traits<br />
dispersed <strong>in</strong> subspecies has been a major breed<strong>in</strong>g strategy <strong>in</strong><br />
rice. However, the restricted recomb<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>in</strong> hybrids between<br />
subspecies has been a constra<strong>in</strong>t and, also, there were no critical<br />
markers to evaluate the genetic constitution of the progenies<br />
from <strong>in</strong>tersubspecific hybrids. This study was conducted<br />
to identify subspecies-specific DNA markers that could be used<br />
for differentiat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dica and japonica varieties us<strong>in</strong>g RAPDs<br />
<strong>in</strong> rice.<br />
Materials and methods<br />
The materials used constituted 30 rice varieties, which belong<br />
to <strong>in</strong>dica, temperate japonica, tropical japonica, or Tongil-type<br />
(high-yield<strong>in</strong>g varieties derived from <strong>in</strong>dica/japonica crosses<br />
but more similar to <strong>in</strong>dica) from various geographical orig<strong>in</strong>s<br />
(Table 1). At first, the bulked segregant analysis (BSA) method<br />
(Michelmore et al 1991) was adopted for prelim<strong>in</strong>ary screen<strong>in</strong>g<br />
of specific markers. Four DNA bulks, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g five varieties<br />
each from four varietal groups, were made and screened.<br />
Next, 30 varieties were further tested us<strong>in</strong>g the markers selected<br />
through the BSA method. Genomic DNA was extracted<br />
from the leaves of each variety. Table 2 lists the primers tested<br />
<strong>in</strong> this study.<br />
The PI (prototype <strong>in</strong>dex) of each variety was calculated<br />
as follows: PI = (number of subspecies-specific bands of a<br />
variety)/(total number of all subspecies-specific bands). If a<br />
variety has a PI close to 1 or 0, it has a genetic constitution<br />
close to an <strong>in</strong>dica or japonica prototype, respectively. As a<br />
consequence, the SPV (subspecies-prototype variety) concept<br />
was <strong>in</strong>troduced. The SPV is a variety that possesses all the<br />
subspecies-specific markers, and that is regarded as a typical<br />
variety belong<strong>in</strong>g to either <strong>in</strong>dica or japonica. The genetic similarity<br />
among varieties was obta<strong>in</strong>ed by us<strong>in</strong>g the computer<br />
software NTSYS-PC.<br />
Some of the breed<strong>in</strong>g l<strong>in</strong>es from crosses between<br />
Dasanbyeo (<strong>in</strong>dica) and TR22183 (japonica), and Dasanbyeo<br />
and Seosan2 (japonica), were tested for genetic constitution<br />
by selected subspecies-specific markers.<br />
Results and discussion<br />
Figure 1 shows a sample profile result<strong>in</strong>g from screen<strong>in</strong>g primers,<br />
which produced subspecies-specific bands via the BSA<br />
method. The uppermost band of the first two lanes was produced<br />
us<strong>in</strong>g the primer OPF09 only <strong>in</strong> japonica, whereas the<br />
third band from the top of the other two lanes was produced<br />
only <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>dica. When the genomic DNA of 30 varieties was<br />
amplified by the primer OPF09, it was confirmed that the up-<br />
Genetic diversity, evolution, and alien <strong>in</strong>trogression 157
Table 1. <strong>Rice</strong> varieties used <strong>in</strong> analysis.<br />
Temperate japonica Tropical japonica Tongil-type Indica<br />
1 a Tong88-7 C b 11 Gogowiere 16 Dasanbyeo K 21 Ch<strong>in</strong>a1039 C<br />
2 Ilpumbyeo K 12 Malagit S<strong>in</strong>agu<strong>in</strong>g P 17 Milyang 23 K 22 IR36 IR<br />
3 Dongj<strong>in</strong>byeo K 13 B581A6 P 18 Chungcheongbyeo K 23 IR72 IR<br />
4 TR22183 C 14 CP-SLO U 19 Hankangchalbyeo K 24 Tadukan P<br />
5 Hapcheon 1 K 15 Azucena P 20 Nampungbyeo K 25 Tetep V<br />
6 Nor<strong>in</strong> mochi 1 J 26 Arc10239 I<br />
7 Nagdongbyeo K 27 Basmati370 S<br />
8 Sh<strong>in</strong>geumobyeo K 28 IR21015 IR<br />
9 Nipponbare J 29 New Sabramati I<br />
10 Hwacheongbyeo K 30 Ch<strong>in</strong>surah Boro II I<br />
a Varietal code. b Geographical orig<strong>in</strong>: C = Ch<strong>in</strong>a, K = Korea, J = Japan, I = India, S = Sri Lanka, U = USA, P = Philipp<strong>in</strong>es, V = Vietnam, IR = <strong>IRRI</strong>.<br />
Table 2. Primers used <strong>in</strong> analyz<strong>in</strong>g rice varieties.<br />
Type Primer Total Source<br />
Decamer random OPA01–OPL20, OPN05, OPN16, OPO15, 253 Operon Corp.<br />
primer a<br />
OPP01, OPP16, OPQ05, OPR13, OPR15,<br />
OPT07, OPU06, OPU09, OPU13, OPW02<br />
CMNA32 b 1 Suh et al (1997)<br />
Eicosamer random URP01–URP12 12 NIAST c<br />
primer<br />
a Random primers of OPERON Corp., OPA01–OPL20, were primarily tested, and several additional primers that<br />
have been reported (Kwon et al 1998, Suh et al 1997) to produce subspecies-specific bands were also tested<br />
<strong>in</strong> this study. b A primer that has been reported by Dr. Suh to produce subspecies-specific bands. c URPs (universal<br />
random primers) are designed by Dr. Kang at the National Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology<br />
(NIAST), Korea.<br />
M 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30<br />
Fig. 1. A sample profile show<strong>in</strong>g<br />
results of bulk screen<strong>in</strong>g of<br />
varietal groups by OPF09 (left<br />
to right lane: japonica, tropical<br />
japonica, Tongil, and <strong>in</strong>dica, respectively).<br />
Fig. 2. RAPD profiles of 30 rice varieties amplified by OPF09. (Number codes refer to varieties listed<br />
<strong>in</strong> Table 1. The first 15 varieties on the left, except Tong 88-7 (1), had the japonica-specific band <strong>in</strong><br />
common. The 15 varieties on the right, except Milyang23 (17) and Ch<strong>in</strong>a1039 (21), had two <strong>in</strong>dicaspecific<br />
bands <strong>in</strong> common.)<br />
permost band appeared only <strong>in</strong> japonica and the third band<br />
only <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>dica. One additional band, the fourth from the top,<br />
which was specific to <strong>in</strong>dica, was also found (Fig. 2).<br />
Of 266 random primers tested, 103 primers were prelim<strong>in</strong>arily<br />
selected by BSA to produce subspecies-specific<br />
bands. Of these, 53 primers that showed discrete and strong<br />
bands were further tested us<strong>in</strong>g 30 varieties. F<strong>in</strong>ally, 25 primers<br />
were selected to produce subspecies-specific bands (Table<br />
3). The 31 subspecies-specific bands amplified by the 25 primers<br />
consisted of 11 bands, which are present only <strong>in</strong> japonica,<br />
19 bands present only <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>dica, and 1 band found only <strong>in</strong><br />
Tongil-type varieties (Table 4).<br />
Figure 3 shows a cluster diagram of 30 varieties for genetic<br />
similarity based on 31 subspecies-specific bands, which<br />
were classified <strong>in</strong>to two discrete subspecies groups as expected.<br />
The SPV concept was tentatively <strong>in</strong>troduced. The varieties were<br />
Ilpumbyeo, Dongj<strong>in</strong>byeo, Hapcheon 1, Nor<strong>in</strong> mochi 1,<br />
Nagdongbyeo, Sh<strong>in</strong>geumobyeo, Nipponbare, Malagit<br />
S<strong>in</strong>agu<strong>in</strong>g, B581A6, and CP-SLO for japonica and IR36,<br />
Tadukan, Tetep, and New Sabramati for <strong>in</strong>dica. The prototype<br />
<strong>in</strong>dex was calculated for each variety. All the SPVs had a PI =<br />
1 (Fig. 4); the PIs of the others were below 1 and were proportional<br />
to their genetic similarity to each SPV.<br />
The breed<strong>in</strong>g l<strong>in</strong>es from crosses between Dasanbyeo (<strong>in</strong>dica)<br />
and TR22183 (japonica), and between Dasanbyeo and<br />
Seosan2 (japonica), were analyzed by selected subspecies-specific<br />
markers. All the l<strong>in</strong>es turned out to be genetically closer<br />
to the <strong>in</strong>dica parent, Dasanbyeo. This implied that breed<strong>in</strong>g<br />
158 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
Table 3. Results of the RAPD analysis.<br />
Subspecies-<br />
Total Primers Polymorphic markers specific markers (no.)<br />
Primers tested selected by<br />
primers (no.) BSA (no.) Primers tested Bands Primers Bands<br />
(no.) produced (no.)<br />
RAPD 254 96 46 335 21 27<br />
URP 12 7 7 108 4 4<br />
Total 266 103 53 443 25 31<br />
Table 4. Subspecies-specific markers (bands) identified<br />
<strong>in</strong> rice.<br />
Coefficient<br />
0.0 0.5 0.6 0.8 1.0<br />
Marker name a Type b Marker name Type<br />
A07-1000 T N16-500 J<br />
B11-720 I O15-320 I<br />
C05-1300 I Q05-1100 J<br />
C15-750 I Q05-1050 J<br />
D08-1300 I R13-600 I<br />
E08-450 J R13-420 I<br />
E14-450 I R15-1200 J<br />
E20-850 I U06-550 J<br />
F09-1500 J U13-350 I<br />
F09-650 I W02-550 J<br />
F09-550 I URP01-1100 I<br />
G03-350 I URP04-1020 I<br />
G10-650 I URP10-2000 J<br />
G10-450 I URP11-800 I<br />
I01-2000 J<br />
I08-520 I<br />
J10-1000 J<br />
a Marker nomenclature was done as follows: A07-1000, the band<br />
was produced by the OPA07 primer and its size was 1,000 bp.<br />
b Types I, J, and T <strong>in</strong>dicate that each subspecies-specific marker<br />
(band) is produced only <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>dica, japonica, and Tongil-type, respectively.<br />
l<strong>in</strong>es of certa<strong>in</strong> varietal types could be preferred by selection<br />
<strong>in</strong> the progenies from <strong>in</strong>tersubspecific hybridization. In addition,<br />
this might be related to segregation distortion <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>in</strong>tersubspecific crosses. The subspecies-specific markers could<br />
be a criterion for select<strong>in</strong>g l<strong>in</strong>es with desirable traits through<br />
maximized recomb<strong>in</strong>ation between subspecies. Screen<strong>in</strong>g for<br />
more subspecies-specific DNA markers, isolation of each<br />
marker band, and mapp<strong>in</strong>g of the markers are <strong>in</strong> progress.<br />
References<br />
Ahn SN, Park HW, Choi HC, Moon HP. 1996. F<strong>in</strong>gerpr<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g of<br />
japonica rice cultivars us<strong>in</strong>g RAPD markers. Kor. J. Breed.<br />
28(2):178-183.<br />
Ahn SN, Kwak TS, Kang KH, Jeon YH, Choi HC, Moon HP. 1998.<br />
Relationship between heterosis and genetic distance as measured<br />
by RAPDs analysis <strong>in</strong> rice. Kor. J. Breed. 30(1):16-23.<br />
Cho YS, Hong SK, Song MT, Moon HP, Lee JH, Kim NS. 1998.<br />
Comparison of genetic variation among rice varieties detected<br />
by RAPD, AFLP, and SSRP. Kor. J. Genet. 20(2):117-127.<br />
27<br />
Fig. 3. A cluster diagram for 30 varieties. (The numbers<br />
are varietal codes as shown <strong>in</strong> Table 1.)<br />
1<br />
2<br />
3<br />
5<br />
6<br />
7<br />
8<br />
9<br />
12<br />
13<br />
14<br />
11<br />
10<br />
4<br />
15<br />
16<br />
17<br />
18<br />
20<br />
19<br />
22<br />
24<br />
25<br />
29<br />
26<br />
28<br />
30<br />
23<br />
21<br />
Genetic diversity, evolution, and alien <strong>in</strong>trogression 159
PI<br />
1.0<br />
0.9<br />
0.8<br />
0.7<br />
0.6<br />
0.5<br />
0.4<br />
0.3<br />
0.2<br />
0.1<br />
0<br />
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29<br />
Japonica<br />
Indica<br />
Fig. 4. The prototype <strong>in</strong>dex (PI) of each<br />
variety us<strong>in</strong>g only subspecies-specific<br />
markers belong<strong>in</strong>g to japonica or <strong>in</strong>dica.<br />
(The numbers are varietal codes<br />
as shown <strong>in</strong> Table 1.)<br />
Kwon SJ, Ahn SN, Hong HC, Moon HP, Choi HC. 1998. PCR markers<br />
for <strong>in</strong>dica and japonica differentiation <strong>in</strong> rice (Oryza sativa<br />
L.). Kor. J. Crop Sci. (supp1.):112-113.<br />
Michelmore RW, Paran I, Kesseki KV. 1991. Identification of markers<br />
l<strong>in</strong>ked to disease resistance genes by bulked-segregant<br />
analysis: a rapid method to detect markers <strong>in</strong> specific agronomic<br />
regions by us<strong>in</strong>g segregation populations. Proc. Natl.<br />
Acad. Sci. USA 88:9828-9332.<br />
Paterson AH, Tanksley SD, Sorrells ME. 1991. DNA markers <strong>in</strong><br />
plant improvement. Adv. Agron. 46:39-90.<br />
Suh HS, Sato YI, Morishima H. 1997. Genetic characterization of<br />
weedy rice (Oryza sativa L.) based on morpho-physiology,<br />
isozymes and RAPD markers. Theor. Appl. Genet. 94:316-<br />
321.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ address: School of Plant Science, College of Agriculture<br />
and Life Sciences, Seoul National University, Suwon 441-<br />
744, Korea.<br />
Acknowledgments: This work was supported by a grant from the<br />
Center for Plant Molecular <strong>Genetics</strong> and Breed<strong>in</strong>g Research,<br />
Korea Science and Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g Foundation.<br />
Identify<strong>in</strong>g RAPD markers to classify rice germplasm<br />
as <strong>in</strong>dica or japonica<br />
R.P. da Cruz, M.C.B. Lopes, S.C.K. Milach, and S.I.G. Lopes<br />
Cultivated rice is divided <strong>in</strong>to two subspecies, <strong>in</strong>dica and japonica, with dist<strong>in</strong>ct orig<strong>in</strong>s, that differ <strong>in</strong> many morphological and<br />
physiological characters, which make them adapted to different k<strong>in</strong>ds of environments. Know<strong>in</strong>g the subspecies of a genotype<br />
is important <strong>in</strong> a breed<strong>in</strong>g program to better organize germplasm resources and develop appropriate breed<strong>in</strong>g strategies. In Rio<br />
Grande do Sul, southern Brazil, most of the rice genotypes cultivated nowadays are of the <strong>in</strong>dica type. In the past, however,<br />
some japonica genotypes have been widely planted, such as Bluebelle. Today, breed<strong>in</strong>g programs have an <strong>in</strong>terest <strong>in</strong> japonica<br />
types for <strong>in</strong>trogress<strong>in</strong>g cold-tolerance genes <strong>in</strong>to <strong>in</strong>dica genotypes, which are better adapted but lack this tolerance. S<strong>in</strong>ce it is<br />
difficult to determ<strong>in</strong>e the subspecies of some genotypes based only on morphological characters, this work aimed at identify<strong>in</strong>g<br />
RAPD markers for determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g genotype subspecies. Bulked segregant analysis was used to identify polymorphic fragments<br />
between <strong>in</strong>dica and japonica subspecies. Ten <strong>in</strong>dica and 10 japonica genotypes had their DNA mixed. The two DNA bulks were<br />
analyzed with 48 Operon primers, and only 17 produced polymorphic fragments. Among the primers tested <strong>in</strong> the open bulks,<br />
only one produced a fragment that allowed genotype subspecies identification.<br />
160 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
Table 1. Genotypes studied and their subspecies<br />
and country of orig<strong>in</strong>.<br />
Genotype<br />
Indica<br />
BR-IRGA 409<br />
Cica 8<br />
El Paso 144<br />
EMBRAPA 7—Taim<br />
Epagri 108<br />
IRGA 416<br />
Oryzica 1<br />
Supremo 1—sel. Colombia<br />
IRGA 284-18-2-2-2<br />
IRGA 369-31-2-3F-A1-1<br />
Japonica<br />
Bluebelle<br />
Cypress<br />
EEA 406<br />
IAS 12-9 Formosa<br />
INIA Tacuarí<br />
L 202<br />
Diamante<br />
Quilla 66304<br />
Quilla 64117<br />
Koshihikari<br />
Cultivated rice has two widely known subspecies, <strong>in</strong>dica and<br />
japonica. Differentiation between them has primarily been done<br />
through morphological and physiological characters (Oka<br />
1991). Later, isozyme polymorphism proved to be an efficient<br />
tool for rice subspecies determ<strong>in</strong>ation (Glaszmann 1987). More<br />
recent developments <strong>in</strong> DNA markers provide a powerful tool<br />
for genotype assessment and classification of rice germplasm<br />
(Yu and Nguyen 1994, Mackill 1995). The use of japonica<br />
genotypes <strong>in</strong> breed<strong>in</strong>g programs of the southern region of Brazil<br />
has <strong>in</strong>creased because of their cold tolerance. Accurate<br />
determ<strong>in</strong>ation of a genotype’s subspecies is important for<br />
germplasm organization and use <strong>in</strong> rice breed<strong>in</strong>g. This study<br />
aimed at identify<strong>in</strong>g RAPD markers for rice subspecies characterization.<br />
Materials and methods<br />
Orig<strong>in</strong><br />
Brazil<br />
Colombia<br />
Uruguay<br />
Brazil<br />
Brazil<br />
Brazil<br />
Colombia<br />
Brazil<br />
Brazil<br />
Brazil<br />
USA<br />
USA<br />
Brazil<br />
Taiwan (Ch<strong>in</strong>a)<br />
Uruguay<br />
USA<br />
Chile<br />
Chile<br />
Chile<br />
Japan<br />
Twenty rice genotypes were used <strong>in</strong> this study, with 10 each<br />
represent<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dica and japonica subspecies. They were chosen<br />
based on diversity of orig<strong>in</strong> (Table 1). DNA was extracted<br />
from the coleoptile s<strong>in</strong>ce this tissue provides enough goodquality<br />
DNA. The extraction was done us<strong>in</strong>g a sodium dodecyl<br />
sulfate (SDS)-based protocol (Nelson 1993).<br />
Random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) markers<br />
were used with the bulked segregant analysis (BSA) method<br />
to detect specific primers for each subspecies group. Two DNA<br />
bulks were prepared by tak<strong>in</strong>g 10 µL of each genotype’s work<strong>in</strong>g<br />
sample and mix<strong>in</strong>g them. Forty-eight random primers from<br />
Operon (Table 2) were tested <strong>in</strong> the bulks to determ<strong>in</strong>e subspecies<br />
specificity. RAPD reactions were run on an MJ Research<br />
thermocycler. The 13-µL reaction consisted of 1X Taq<br />
polymerase buffer, 2.5 mM MgCl 2 , 0.2 mM dNTPmix, 25 ng<br />
Table 2. Operon primers tested and parameters evaluated to determ<strong>in</strong>e<br />
primer efficiency <strong>in</strong> differentiat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dica and japonica bulks.<br />
Primers Primers that Polymorphic<br />
Primer series tested amplified the bulks primers<br />
(no.) (%) (no.) (%)<br />
Operon A 3 3 (100.0) 2 (66.7)<br />
Operon D 10 9 (90.0) 4 (44.4)<br />
Operon E 12 8 (66.7) 5 (62.5)<br />
Operon I 9 1 (11.1) 0 (0.0)<br />
Operon J 10 10 (100.0) 6 (60.0)<br />
Operon M 4 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)<br />
Total 48 31 17<br />
of primer, 20 ng of genomic DNA, and 1 unit of Taq polymerase.<br />
Amplification started with 4 m<strong>in</strong> at 94 °C, followed<br />
by 45 cycles of 30 sec at 94 °C (DNA denaturation), 30 sec at<br />
37 °C (primer anneal<strong>in</strong>g), and 66 sec at 72 °C (primer extension).<br />
The reaction was term<strong>in</strong>ated after 7 m<strong>in</strong> at 72 °C. RAPD<br />
products were separated <strong>in</strong> a 2% agarose gel conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />
ethidium bromide. A 100-bp DNA ladder was used to determ<strong>in</strong>e<br />
the size of the fragments. Amplification products were<br />
visualized under UV light and photographed to <strong>in</strong>vestigate the<br />
existence of polymorphism between the two DNA bulks for<br />
the primers tested.<br />
Primers that showed polymorphism between the <strong>in</strong>dica<br />
and japonica bulks were tested <strong>in</strong> the “open” bulks by perform<strong>in</strong>g<br />
a RAPD reaction for each genotype.<br />
Results and discussion<br />
Of 48 primers tested, 31 amplified the two DNA bulks, but<br />
only 17 produced polymorphic fragments between them. Primers<br />
from Operon series A, D, E, and J presented the highest<br />
level of amplification and also produced polymorphic fragments<br />
between <strong>in</strong>dica and japonica bulks. Primers from series<br />
I and M did not amplify, with the exception of a primer from<br />
series I (Table 2). Figure 1 shows polymorphism obta<strong>in</strong>ed between<br />
<strong>in</strong>dica and japonica bulks with 10 primers from Operon<br />
series J. It would be ideal to get amplification of only one of<br />
the bulks, but this was observed for only two primers (Fig. 1).<br />
Ten polymorphic primers were further tested <strong>in</strong> the open bulks<br />
to confirm their efficacy. Among these, only one produced a<br />
polymorphic fragment that allowed dist<strong>in</strong>ction between <strong>in</strong>dica<br />
and japonica genotypes (Fig. 2). Other primers still have to be<br />
tested <strong>in</strong> the open bulks to confirm their discrim<strong>in</strong>ation power.<br />
As more markers are identified, the precision of rice subspecies<br />
determ<strong>in</strong>ation will <strong>in</strong>crease. More rice genotypes need to<br />
be screened to test the reliability of the results.<br />
References<br />
Glaszmann JC. 1987. Isozymes and classification of Asian rice varieties.<br />
Theor. Appl. Genet. 74:21-30.<br />
Mackill DJ. 1995. Classify<strong>in</strong>g japonica rice cultivars with RAPD<br />
markers. Crop Sci. 35:889-894.<br />
Genetic diversity, evolution, and alien <strong>in</strong>trogression 161
M 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20<br />
Fig. 1. RAPD fragments of<br />
10 primers from Operon<br />
series J <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>dica and<br />
japonica DNA bulks. (The<br />
first lane is a 100-bp ladder;<br />
even lane numbers<br />
identify the <strong>in</strong>dica bulk and<br />
odd lane numbers identify<br />
the japonica.)<br />
M 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20<br />
900 bp<br />
Fig. 2. RAPD fragments of<br />
primer OPD 5 <strong>in</strong> 10 <strong>in</strong>dica<br />
genotypes and eight<br />
japonica genotypes. (The<br />
first lane is a 100-bp ladder,<br />
the follow<strong>in</strong>g 10 lanes<br />
are <strong>in</strong>dica genotypes, and<br />
the last eight are japonica<br />
genotypes.)<br />
Nelson JC. 1993. ITMI wheat mapp<strong>in</strong>g workshop: laboratory manual.<br />
Cornell University.<br />
Oka HI. 1991. Genetic diversity of wild and cultivated rice. In: Khush<br />
GS, Toenniessen GH, editors. <strong>Rice</strong> biotechnology. Wall<strong>in</strong>gford<br />
(UK): CAB <strong>International</strong>. p 55-81.<br />
Yu LX, Nguyen HT. 1994. Genetic variation detected with RAPD<br />
markers among upland and lowland rice cultivars (Oryza sativa<br />
L.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 87:668-672.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ address: Department of Crop Plants, Rio Grande do Sul<br />
Federal University, P.O. Box 776, 91501-970, Porto Alegre,<br />
Brazil.<br />
DNA f<strong>in</strong>gerpr<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g and phylogenetic analysis of Indian<br />
aromatic high-quality rice germplasm us<strong>in</strong>g panels<br />
of fluorescent-labeled microsatellite markers<br />
S. Ja<strong>in</strong>, S.E. Mitchell, R.K. Ja<strong>in</strong>, S. Kresovich, and S.R. McCouch<br />
Four multiplex panels composed of 30 fluorescent-labeled simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers were used to study the<br />
genetic diversity and phylogenetic relationships among the aromatic high-quality rice germplasm collections from different<br />
parts of India. A total of 248 alleles were detected at 30 SSR loci; the number of alleles per locus ranged from 3 to 22, with<br />
an average of 8.2. Genetic diversity was evaluated by estimat<strong>in</strong>g the polymorphism <strong>in</strong>formation content (PIC), distribution,<br />
frequency, and range of allele sizes for each microsatellite locus. The similarity coefficients were analyzed to study phylogenetic<br />
162 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
elationships by cluster<strong>in</strong>g algorithms. The PIC values, which are a reflection of allelic diversity among the varieties, were quite<br />
high for all the microsatellites, averag<strong>in</strong>g 0.565, and rang<strong>in</strong>g from 0.203 to 0.904. The size range between the smallest and<br />
largest allele for a given microsatellite varied from 3 to 68 bp. Microsatellite marker-based polymorphism was useful for<br />
dissect<strong>in</strong>g f<strong>in</strong>e levels of genetic diversity among basmati rice varieties, and between basmati and nonbasmati varieties. Cluster<strong>in</strong>g<br />
analyses <strong>in</strong>dicate high levels of genetic diversity among the scented/high-quality rice germplasm of India. Several SSR<br />
markers were identified that can be used to differentiate the commercially important basmati rice varieties.<br />
Basmati rice is one of the most valued aromatic and superf<strong>in</strong>equality<br />
rice varieties <strong>in</strong> the world (Khush and dela Cruz 1998).<br />
Adulteration of superior basmati rice supplies with less expensive<br />
and lower-quality <strong>in</strong>dica or basmati rice is quite common.<br />
DNA f<strong>in</strong>gerpr<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g of basmati rice varieties can be used<br />
to differentiate Indian basmati rice from other cheaper longgra<strong>in</strong><br />
rice cultivars and to identify seed mixtures. Hundreds of<br />
other related scented and high-quality rice varieties are be<strong>in</strong>g<br />
grown <strong>in</strong> different parts of the Indian subcont<strong>in</strong>ent.<br />
Microsatellite DNA markers (also known as simple sequence<br />
repeats, SSRs) have been efficiently employed for cultivar identification<br />
and genotyp<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> rice (McCouch et al 1997). More<br />
than 500 mapped SSRs have been developed for rice (Temnykh<br />
et al 2000).<br />
Genetic profiles produced us<strong>in</strong>g SSRs can be used <strong>in</strong><br />
conjunction with pedigree and agronomic data to document<br />
ownership and protect <strong>in</strong>tellectual property rights. We used<br />
four multiplex panels composed of 30 microsatellites for DNA<br />
f<strong>in</strong>gerpr<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g of 85 rice varieties represent<strong>in</strong>g the scented/highquality<br />
rice germplasm collected from different parts of the<br />
Indian subcont<strong>in</strong>ent. The SSR-f<strong>in</strong>gerpr<strong>in</strong>t database has been<br />
used to study phylogenetic relationships.<br />
Materials and methods<br />
Indian aromatic/high-quality rice varieties/accessions (Fig. 1)<br />
were obta<strong>in</strong>ed from the CCS Haryana Agricultural University<br />
(HAU) <strong>Rice</strong> Research Station, Kaul, Haryana, India. Varieties<br />
IR36, IR64, Azucena, Kasalath, BS125, and Nipponbare were<br />
used as reference controls. Total genomic DNA was isolated<br />
from the pooled leaf material of five plants. Thirty<br />
microsatellites, organized <strong>in</strong>to four panels (A, B, C, and D)<br />
each consist<strong>in</strong>g of 7–8 fluorescent-labeled markers, were used<br />
as described <strong>in</strong> Blair et al (2002). The forward primers of the<br />
markers were labeled with hexachloro-6-carboxyfluoresce<strong>in</strong><br />
(HEX), tetrachloro-6-carboxyfluoresce<strong>in</strong> (TET), or 6-<br />
carboxyfluoresce<strong>in</strong> (6-FAM) dye phosphoramidites, synthesized<br />
on an Applied Biosystem 392 by the Cornell Bioresource<br />
Facility. Individual PCR amplification of each microsatellite<br />
was carried out <strong>in</strong> a total volume of 15 µL as described by<br />
Panaud et al (1996) and Temnykh et al (2000). The PCR products<br />
for each set of microsatellites were mixed together <strong>in</strong> a<br />
ratio of 1:2:4 : FAM:TET:HEX. About 0.5 µL of the mixed<br />
microsatellite samples was comb<strong>in</strong>ed with 1 µL of a load<strong>in</strong>g<br />
buffer (98% formamide, 10 mm EDTA, blue dextran) and 0.1<br />
µL of an <strong>in</strong>ternal-lane size standard, TAMRA-labeled<br />
Genescan-350 (Applied Biosystem, Foster City, CA) as recommended<br />
by Blair et al (2002). Samples were denatured at<br />
95 ºC for 2 m<strong>in</strong> and run for 6 h on 96-well, 5% denatur<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Long-ranger polyacrylamide gels (8.0 M urea) <strong>in</strong> 1X TBE<br />
buffer with the recommended run module (constant 30 Watts)<br />
and with filter set B us<strong>in</strong>g the ABI 377A Perk<strong>in</strong> Elmer<br />
auotomated DNA sequencer. Molecular weights for<br />
microsatellite bands, <strong>in</strong> base pairs, were estimated with<br />
Genescan 672 software by the local Southern method. Individual<br />
bands were designated as alleles of the appropriate<br />
microsatellite loci us<strong>in</strong>g the Genotyper software package. Allele<br />
b<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g was conducted us<strong>in</strong>g the procedure described by<br />
Ghosh et al (1997). The polymorphism <strong>in</strong>formation content<br />
(PIC) for each microsatellite marker was calculated accord<strong>in</strong>g<br />
to Anderson et al (1993). Similarity matrices were produced<br />
us<strong>in</strong>g the “simqual” subprogram of software NTSYS-PC (Rholf<br />
1993). The similarity coefficients were used for cluster analysis<br />
of the varieties, performed us<strong>in</strong>g the “Sahn” subprogram of<br />
NTSYS-PC, and to build dendrograms by UPGMA.<br />
Results and discussion<br />
Four multiplex panels with a total of 30 fluorescent-labeled<br />
SSRs (Table 1) designed by Blair et al (2002) were used for<br />
assess<strong>in</strong>g genetic diversity among the 85 rice varieties. These<br />
SSRs were selected from the collection of markers already<br />
mapped <strong>in</strong> rice (Temnykh et al 2000, Blair et al 2002).<br />
Table 1 describes the 30 SSRs used <strong>in</strong> the four multiplex<br />
panels and data on the number of alleles scored, their size range,<br />
and PIC values <strong>in</strong> this data set. Each <strong>in</strong>dividual SSR had a<br />
unique band<strong>in</strong>g pattern with a specific number of stutter-bands,<br />
signal peak width, slope, and spread that could easily be recognized<br />
and used to confirm allele scor<strong>in</strong>g. In all the panels,<br />
microsatellite markers tagged with the same dye color did not<br />
overlap each other, and thus allele call<strong>in</strong>g was straightforward<br />
and unequivocal <strong>in</strong> all the panels. As only the most <strong>in</strong>tense<br />
band was evaluated for molecular weight, the stutter<strong>in</strong>g did<br />
not <strong>in</strong>terfere with allele call<strong>in</strong>g. The four multiplex panels produced<br />
a total of 248 alleles from 85 genotypes; the number of<br />
alleles for A, B, C, and D panels were 54, 44, 66, and 84,<br />
respectively. The average number of alleles per SSR was 8.2<br />
and the number of alleles for each SSR ranged from 3 (RM133,<br />
RM323) to as many as 22 (RM252). The size range between<br />
the smallest and largest allele for a given microsatellite varied<br />
from 3 to 68 bp (Table 1). The PIC values, which reflect allelic<br />
diversity among the varieties, were quite high for all the<br />
microsatellites, averag<strong>in</strong>g 0.565, and rang<strong>in</strong>g from a low of<br />
0.203 (RM337) to a high of 0.904 (RM252).<br />
All the rice genotypes except two (Basmati 370 BD and<br />
Belugyun) could be differentiated by the allelic polymorphism<br />
Genetic diversity, evolution, and alien <strong>in</strong>trogression 163
Kasalath<br />
Bogajoha<br />
Acc277805<br />
Ambemohar157<br />
Bas370BngDes<br />
Balugyun<br />
D66<br />
BasMehtrah<br />
BasSathi<br />
Bas370<br />
HBC-19<br />
Akp-1<br />
BasNorat439<br />
BarhaiL<br />
Bas370Pakistan<br />
Ch<strong>in</strong>iSakkar<br />
Bas397<br />
Bas6113<br />
Bas5836<br />
Bas334<br />
BasSufaid100<br />
Bas150<br />
Bas370B<br />
Bas405<br />
BPT1235<br />
Bas372A<br />
Bas213<br />
Ch<strong>in</strong>iGuri<br />
CBasmati<br />
Taraori<br />
Bas6313<br />
Cemposelak<br />
Dulhamiya<br />
Bas375<br />
BasIndia<br />
Dubraj<br />
Chokjyebichal5<br />
Bas93B<br />
PusaBasmati1<br />
DM24<br />
Blomberg<br />
HKR(93)401<br />
ARC14865<br />
BegamiT-1<br />
HKR-228<br />
Bas134<br />
Bogajoha<br />
Bas502<br />
Begami2-8<br />
Begami40<br />
MI-48<br />
Ayepyung<br />
Bas217<br />
BasKamon<br />
BS125cornell<br />
Bas6131<br />
CSR18<br />
CSR10<br />
CSR11<br />
BokulJoha<br />
Chokjyebichal4<br />
Calrose76<br />
HKR-120<br />
BasTall<br />
IR36cornell<br />
CSR13<br />
IR64cornell<br />
Chokjyebichal3<br />
Gob<strong>in</strong>d<br />
HKR-126<br />
ChuXiangXian<br />
BasT3Haiti<br />
BasA3-3<br />
Bas242<br />
CSR21<br />
BasC622<br />
Della<br />
Pokkali<br />
Ambemohar1<br />
Azucena<br />
BasBahar<br />
Nipponbare<br />
NPT-1<br />
NPT-3<br />
NPT-2<br />
0.80 0.85 0.90 0.95 1.00<br />
Coefficient<br />
Fig. 1. Dendrogram of 85 rice genotypes based on genetic diversity data for 248 alleles. Bas = basmati; BngDes =<br />
Bangladesh; NPT = new plant type obta<strong>in</strong>ed from <strong>IRRI</strong>.<br />
164 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
Table 1. Data on allele size range, number of alleles, and polymorphism <strong>in</strong>formation content (PIC) among<br />
85 rice genotypes for 30 fluorescently labeled microsatellites from four multiplex panels (A, B, C, and D).<br />
Panel/ Genebank or Chromosome Repeat Size Alleles PIC<br />
fluorescent Marker clone number type (bp) (no.) value<br />
label a<br />
number<br />
Panel A<br />
FAM RM135 Osm35 3 (CGG) 10 119–131 4 0.530<br />
RM280 CT780 4 (GA) 16 151–181 9 0.579<br />
TET RM170 Osm68 6 (CCT) 7 99–119 7 0.578<br />
RM153 Osm53 5 (GAA) 9 190–205 4 0.521<br />
RM182 M1 7 (AT) 16 328–349 4 0.373<br />
HEX RM286 CT806 11 (GA) 16 99–126 11 0.476<br />
RM110 Osm10 2 (GA) 15 138–159 8 0.613<br />
RM174 Osm74 2 (ACG) 7 (GA) 10 207–223 7 0.567<br />
Mean 6.8 0.530<br />
Panel B<br />
FAM RM312 GT165 1 (ATTT) 4 (GT) 9 97–106 6 0.558<br />
RM105 Osm5 9 (CCT) 6 126–138 5 0.493<br />
RM171 Osm71 10 (GATG) 5 320–350 12 0.732<br />
TET RM133 Osm33 6 (CT) 8 230–233 3 0.227<br />
RM103 Osm3 6 (GAA) 5 327–338 5 0.599<br />
HEX RM282 CT787 3 (GA) 15 125–137 5 0.489<br />
RM337 CTT64 8 (CTT) 4 -19-(CTT) 8 157–192 8 0.203<br />
Mean 6.3 0.560<br />
Panel C<br />
FAM RM1 GA12 1 (GA) 26 75–116 11 0.621<br />
RM122 – 5 (GA) 11 226–247 8 0.290<br />
TET RM5 GA273 1 (GA) 15 106–129 9 0.624<br />
RM55 GA587 3 (GA) 17 215–240 8 0.568<br />
HEX RM248 CT469 7 (GA) 25 72–104 10 0.582<br />
RM231 CT234 3 (GA) 16 168–194 10 0.509<br />
RM38 GA344 8 (GA) 16 231–263 10 0.774<br />
Mean<br />
Panel D<br />
FAM RM253 CT452 6 (GA) 25 88–115 12 0.776<br />
RM224 CT199 11 (GA) 13 121–159 9 0.628<br />
RM252 CT206 4 (GA) 19 194–262 22 0.904<br />
TET RM229 CT224 11 (GA) 11 104–136 8 0.575<br />
RM17a GA56 12 (GA) 21 158–187 8 0.656<br />
RM222 CT193 10 (GA) 18 193–225 13 0.761<br />
HEX RM44 GA408 8 (GA) 16 100–131 9 0.685<br />
RM323 CAT69 1 (CAT) 5 242–245 3 0.469<br />
Mean 10.5 0.682<br />
a FAM = 6-carboxyfluoresce<strong>in</strong>, TET = tetrachloro-6-carboxyfluoresce<strong>in</strong>, HEX = hexachloro-6-carboxyfluoresce<strong>in</strong>.<br />
at one or more of the 30 SSR loci screened. Identification of<br />
markers that dist<strong>in</strong>guish closely related basmati rice cultivars<br />
such as Taraori Basmati, Basmati 370, and Pusa Basmati 1 is<br />
of <strong>in</strong>terest to exporters, commercial suppliers, and consumers<br />
because of vast differences <strong>in</strong> their market prices. Results<br />
showed that a s<strong>in</strong>gle SSR marker, RM252, was sufficient to<br />
discrim<strong>in</strong>ate these basmati rice varieties. As many as 15 other<br />
SSRs could differentiate between two or more of the basmati<br />
rice varieties.<br />
Figure 1 shows the dendrogram depict<strong>in</strong>g the phylogenetic<br />
analysis of 85 rice genotypes obta<strong>in</strong>ed by UPGMA cluster<br />
analysis based on diversity at 248 alleles. The cluster<strong>in</strong>g<br />
analysis placed the 85 rice genotypes <strong>in</strong> seven groups, with a<br />
similarity coefficient of 80%. The analyses <strong>in</strong>dicate high levels<br />
of genetic diversity among the scented/high-quality rice<br />
genotypes available <strong>in</strong> India. A total of 48 Indian scented/highquality<br />
rice varieties, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g the traditional basmati rice<br />
accessions (e.g., Taraori Basmati, Basmati 370, etc.) and the<br />
cross-bred Pusa Basmati 1, were grouped together. Another<br />
major group was composed of several <strong>in</strong>dica rice varieties such<br />
as the salt-tolerant CSR varieties, high-yield<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dica varieties<br />
developed <strong>in</strong> India (HKR126, Gob<strong>in</strong>d, etc.), at <strong>IRRI</strong>, Philipp<strong>in</strong>es<br />
(IR36), <strong>in</strong> Australia (Della), and <strong>in</strong> the United States<br />
(Calrose76), along with a few basmati/scented rice collections<br />
from India. New plant type accessions (<strong>IRRI</strong>, Philipp<strong>in</strong>es) along<br />
with japonica rice varieties Azucena and Nipponbare and a<br />
Genetic diversity, evolution, and alien <strong>in</strong>trogression 165
asmati rice accession, Basmati Bahar, were placed together.<br />
The salt-tolerant variety Pokkali, salt-sensitive MI-48, and the<br />
Indian scented accession Ambemohar 1 formed <strong>in</strong>dividual<br />
groups. The scented rice accessions Kasalath and Bogajoha<br />
formed a separate group.<br />
The high frequency of rare alleles, high PIC values, a<br />
large number of alleles and allele size ranges, low similarity<br />
values, and the overall results of the phylogenetic analysis <strong>in</strong>dicate<br />
the presence of substantial genetic diversity <strong>in</strong> available<br />
Indian aromatic/high-quality rice germplasm. These results<br />
<strong>in</strong>dicate a complex pattern of evolution for these Indian<br />
basmati/scented/high-quality rice genotypes and suggest that<br />
they have probably evolved over a long time like the other<br />
genotypes belong<strong>in</strong>g to the Oryza sativa complex.<br />
References<br />
Anderson JA, Churchill GA, Autrique JE, Tanksley SD, Sorrells ME.<br />
1993. Optimiz<strong>in</strong>g parental selection for genetic l<strong>in</strong>kage maps.<br />
Genome 36:181-186.<br />
Blair MW, Hedetale V, McCouch SR. 2000. Fluorescent-labeled<br />
microsatellite panels useful for detect<strong>in</strong>g allelic diversity <strong>in</strong><br />
cultivated rice (Oryza sativa L.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 105:449-<br />
457.<br />
Ghosh S, Karanjawala ZE, Hauser ER, Ally D, Knapp JI, Rayman<br />
JB, Musick A, Tannenbaum J, Te C, Shapiro S, Elrridge W,<br />
Musick T, Mart<strong>in</strong> C, Smith JR, Carpten, Brownste<strong>in</strong> MJ,<br />
Powell JI, Whiten R, Ch<strong>in</strong>es P, Nylund SJ, Magnuson VL,<br />
Boehnke M, Coll<strong>in</strong>s FS. 1997. Methods for precise siz<strong>in</strong>g,<br />
automated b<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g of alleles, and reduction of error rates <strong>in</strong><br />
large-scale genotyp<strong>in</strong>g us<strong>in</strong>g fluorescently labeled d<strong>in</strong>ucleotide<br />
markers. Genome Res. 7:165-178.<br />
Khush GS, dela Cruz N. 1998. Develop<strong>in</strong>g Basmati rices with high<br />
yield potential. Cahiers Options Mediterraneennes 24: <strong>Rice</strong><br />
quality. A pluridiscipl<strong>in</strong>ary approach. CD-ROM computer file.<br />
CIHEAM, Paris.<br />
McCouch SR, Chen X, Panaud O, Temnykh S, Xu Y, Cho YG, Huang<br />
N, Ishii T, Blair M. 1997. Microsatellite marker development,<br />
mapp<strong>in</strong>g and applications <strong>in</strong> rice genetics and breed<strong>in</strong>g. Plant<br />
Mol. Biol. 35:89-99.<br />
Panaud O, Chen X, McCouch SR. 1996. Development of<br />
microsatellite markers and characterization of simple sequence<br />
length polymorphism (SSLP) <strong>in</strong> rice (Oryza sativa L.). Mol.<br />
Gen. Genet. 252:597-607.<br />
Rholf FJ. 1993. NTSYS-PC: numerical taxonomy and multivariate<br />
analysis system. Version 1.8, Exeter Software, Setauket, New<br />
York.<br />
Temnykh S, Park WD, Ayres N, Cart<strong>in</strong>hour S, Hauck N, Lipovich L,<br />
Cho YG, Ishii T, McCouch SR. 2000. Mapp<strong>in</strong>g and genome<br />
organization of microsatellite sequences <strong>in</strong> rice (Oryza sativa<br />
L.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 100:697-712.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ addresses: S. Ja<strong>in</strong>, S.E. Mitchell, S. Kresovich, and S.R.<br />
McCouch, Department of Plant Breed<strong>in</strong>g, Cornell University,<br />
Ithaca, NY; S. Ja<strong>in</strong> and R.K. Ja<strong>in</strong>, Department of Biotechnology<br />
and Molecular Biology, CCS Haryana Agricultural University,<br />
Hisar 125 004, India; Fax: 607-255-0420; e-mail:<br />
srm4@cornell.edu.<br />
F<strong>in</strong>gerpr<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g of Indian scented rice by RAPD markers<br />
T. Stobdan, V.K. Khanna, U.S. S<strong>in</strong>gh, and R.K. S<strong>in</strong>gh<br />
The random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) technique was used to characterize and assess the genetic relationships <strong>in</strong> 32<br />
accessions of aromatic rice and three accessions of nonaromatic rice. All ten decamer primers used yielded scorable amplification<br />
patterns based on discernible bands. A dendrogram constructed us<strong>in</strong>g the Jacquard similarity coefficient and the<br />
UPGMA algorithm based on 176 reproducible polymorphic products rang<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> size from 0.32 to 3.0 kb revealed a high level of<br />
variation among the accessions. Cluster analysis separated the 35 rice accessions <strong>in</strong>to two ma<strong>in</strong> groups. All the aromatic rice<br />
clustered together with one exception. The similarity coefficient ranged from 0.370 to 0.811, show<strong>in</strong>g a diverse gene pool.<br />
Accessions show<strong>in</strong>g little morphological variation but hav<strong>in</strong>g the same varietal name clustered together with one exception.<br />
Thus, RAPD markers can detect enough polymorphism, even among closely related aromatic genotypes.<br />
Aromatic rice is higly valued for its high gra<strong>in</strong> quality. India<br />
possesses an immense wealth of aromatic rice with wide variability<br />
for morpho-physiological and cook<strong>in</strong>g qualities. However,<br />
it has been realized that, <strong>in</strong> the wake of the Green Revolution,<br />
<strong>in</strong> which yield was emphasized, a lot of the precious<br />
germplasm was replaced (S<strong>in</strong>gh et al 1997). Plant breeders<br />
have used the genetic diversity of the elite germplasm to determ<strong>in</strong>e<br />
genetic relationships, select parents, manage<br />
germplasm, and sample and protect germplasm. Molecular<br />
markers such as restriction fragment length polymorphism<br />
(RFLP), amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP),<br />
microsatellites, and random amplified polymorphic DNA<br />
(RAPD) have proved to be very useful for analyz<strong>in</strong>g a large<br />
number of genotypes. Of the available molecular markers,<br />
RAPD is one of the simplest to use because hybridization steps<br />
are not required and only a few nanograms of DNA are required<br />
to detect a large number of polymorphisms <strong>in</strong> a short<br />
time (Williams et al 1990). The technique is based on the amplification<br />
by polymerase cha<strong>in</strong> reaction (PCR) of discrete<br />
DNA segments us<strong>in</strong>g small-size oligonucleotide primers of<br />
166 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
Table 1. Accessions used to evaluate genetic variation of aromatic rice.<br />
Code Accession Stra<strong>in</strong>/variety Code Accession Stra<strong>in</strong>/variety<br />
number<br />
number<br />
1 4438 Pusa Basmati 20 4437 Basmati-370<br />
2 5407 Basmati-370 21 5401 Basmati-370<br />
3 4036 Dehraduni Basmati 22 4034 Dehraduni Basmati<br />
4 4042 KH-7 23 4035 Dehraduni Basmati<br />
5 4011 Kasturi 24 4087 Sugandha<br />
6 4435 T-3 25 4088 Khushboo<br />
7 4434 Kalanamak 26 5017 Tapovan-17<br />
8 4085 Chhota Hansraj 27 5013 Tapovan-13<br />
9 4071 Deshi Hansraj 28 5016 Tapovan-16<br />
10 4029 Pakistani Basmati 29 5006 Tapovan-6<br />
11 4095 N-12 30 5005 Tapovan-5<br />
12 4041 T-23 31 5021 Tapovan-21<br />
13 4122 Taraori Basmati 32 – Azucena<br />
14 – Gaurav 33 a – Pant Dhan-4<br />
15 4145 Tapovan-45 34 a – Pant Dhan-12<br />
16 5022 Brown Basmati 35 a – Jaya<br />
17 4444 B<strong>in</strong>dli<br />
18 4048 Tilak Chandan<br />
19 4430 Sonachur<br />
a Nonaromatic.<br />
Table 2. Nucleotide sequence of 10 oligonucleotide primers and<br />
the number of RAPD markers produced <strong>in</strong> the 35 genotypes.<br />
Sequence Total no. of Polymorphic loci<br />
Primer 5′ to 3′ RAPD loci<br />
Number %<br />
T-21 GGACTGGAGT 20 20 100.0<br />
C-19 GGGTAACGCC 16 15 93.8<br />
OPK-11 AATGCCCCAG 19 19 100.0<br />
OPF-14 TGCTGCAGGT 17 16 94.1<br />
OPF-13 GGCTGCAGAA 18 18 100.0<br />
OPF-06 GGGAATTCGG 14 11 78.6<br />
OPC-07 GTCCCGACGA 24 24 100.0<br />
OPD-08 GTGTGCCCCA 21 21 100.0<br />
OPC-15 GACGGATCAG 15 14 93.3<br />
OPJ-13 CCACACTACC 19 17 89.5<br />
random design. Several groups have already used RAPD to<br />
analyze rice genotypes (Virk et al 1995). However, different<br />
groups of Indian scented rice varieties largely rema<strong>in</strong> uncollected.<br />
Therefore, our <strong>in</strong>vestigation was carried out to assess<br />
genetic diversity among Indian aromatic rice.<br />
Materials and methods<br />
The 32 accessions of aromatic rice and three accessions of<br />
nonaromatic rice used <strong>in</strong> this study (Table 1) were orig<strong>in</strong>ally<br />
collected from farmers’ fields of northern India and ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
at G.B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology,<br />
Pantnagar, India. Their selection was based on morphological<br />
characters and gra<strong>in</strong> quality. This selection <strong>in</strong>cluded accessions<br />
collected from different places show<strong>in</strong>g variation <strong>in</strong> their<br />
morphological characters but hav<strong>in</strong>g the same varietal name.<br />
DNA was extracted follow<strong>in</strong>g the method of Dellaporta<br />
et al (1983). RNA was removed by treat<strong>in</strong>g with RNAse A<br />
and f<strong>in</strong>ally purified by phenol:chloroform extraction and ethanol<br />
precipitation. Quantification was done us<strong>in</strong>g a DyNA<br />
Quant TM 2000 fluorometer.<br />
For DNA amplification, 25 µL of reaction mixture was<br />
prepared, conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g 1 ng of DNA, 2.5 µL of PCR 10X buffer,<br />
2 µL of dNTPs (25 mM each), 0.5 unit of Taq polymerase,<br />
0.2 µM of 10-nt primer (Bangalore Genei, India), and sterile<br />
distilled water to a f<strong>in</strong>al volume. Amplification was performed<br />
<strong>in</strong> a Perk<strong>in</strong> Elmer thermocycler as follows: <strong>in</strong>itial stand separation<br />
at 92 °C for 5 m<strong>in</strong>; followed by 45 cycles at 92 °C for<br />
30 sec, 35 °C for 1 m<strong>in</strong>, and 72 °C for 2 m<strong>in</strong>; and a f<strong>in</strong>al hold<br />
at 72 °C for 5 m<strong>in</strong> as described by Virk et al (1995). Table 2<br />
lists the ten decamer primers used. Eight of the ten primers<br />
were selected based on their performance with rice DNA <strong>in</strong> an<br />
earlier report (Virk et al 1995). The amplification products<br />
were electrophoresed <strong>in</strong> 7.5% polyacrylamide gels, visualized<br />
by ethidium bromide sta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g, and photographed under UV<br />
light.<br />
Data were scored on the presence or absence of amplification<br />
products. If a band was present <strong>in</strong> a genotype, it was<br />
designated as 1; if no shared band was present <strong>in</strong> another genotype,<br />
it was designated as 0. Result<strong>in</strong>g matrices of molecular<br />
data for all primers were submitted for analysis. Pairwise similarity<br />
was computed us<strong>in</strong>g the Jacquard similarity coefficient.<br />
A dendrogram was constructed us<strong>in</strong>g the unweighted pairgroup<br />
method with arithmetic average (UPGMA) (Sneath and<br />
Sokal 1973).<br />
Genetic diversity, evolution, and alien <strong>in</strong>trogression 167
Results<br />
Ten decamer primers were used for PCR amplification of the<br />
total DNA of the 35 genotypes. The amplification product of<br />
all the primers showed polymorphism. Figure 1 shows the<br />
RAPD profile amplified by primer OPC-15. A total of 184<br />
products were amplified aga<strong>in</strong>st the 35 genotypes, among which<br />
176 products (95.6%) were polymorphic among these genotypes<br />
and 14–24 polymorphic products were amplified by each<br />
primer (Table 2), yield<strong>in</strong>g 17.6 polymorphic products per<br />
primer on average. This average is larger than what was reported<br />
by Virk et al (1995) and Ko et al (1994).<br />
The 176 polymorphic products with ten primers were<br />
used to generate a similarity coefficient among the 35 genotypes.<br />
The similarity coefficient ranged from 0.370 between<br />
Tapovan-6 and Kalanamak to 0.811 between two different accessions<br />
of Basmati 370 (Fig. 2).<br />
To study the genetic relationships among different accessions,<br />
the matrix of genetic distance was used for cluster<br />
analysis with the UPGMA method and a dendrogram was constructed<br />
(Fig. 2). The dendrogram readily separated the 35<br />
genotypes <strong>in</strong>to two major clusters, with one major cluster be<strong>in</strong>g<br />
further divided <strong>in</strong>to two major ones. Aromatic and<br />
nonaromatic genotypes were clearly classified <strong>in</strong>to two ma<strong>in</strong><br />
clusters at a similarity coefficient of 0.48; a Philipp<strong>in</strong>e aromatic<br />
rice, Azucena, also went <strong>in</strong>to the nonaromatic group.<br />
Discussion<br />
Indian rice has been classified as basmati and nonbasmati accord<strong>in</strong>g<br />
to aroma, kernel length, length/breadth (LB) ratio, and<br />
kernel elongation after cook<strong>in</strong>g. The dist<strong>in</strong>ction between the<br />
two groups is also found <strong>in</strong> terms of the specific area of adaptation<br />
for cultivation. Our results based on RAPD analysis<br />
clearly separated the nonaromatic rice from the aromatic rice.<br />
The aromatic rice was further grouped <strong>in</strong>to two different clusters,<br />
ma<strong>in</strong>ly on the basis of gra<strong>in</strong> shape and size. These results<br />
support the earlier classification of rice <strong>in</strong>to two ma<strong>in</strong> groups,<br />
short-gra<strong>in</strong> and long-gra<strong>in</strong> rice. Significant genetic variation<br />
among the different accessions existed as revealed by RAPD<br />
analysis. Pair-wise comparison <strong>in</strong>dicated that Tapovan-6 and<br />
Kalanamak showed the least similarity. The red rice collected<br />
from the hilly region clustered together <strong>in</strong> the dendrogram and<br />
showed high similarity. The accessions collected from different<br />
places show<strong>in</strong>g little variation <strong>in</strong> their morphological characters<br />
but known by the same varietal name were grouped together<br />
<strong>in</strong> the dendrogram, whereas one accession of Dehraduni<br />
Basmati differed from the other two accessions.<br />
Results show that RAPD can detect enough polymorphism<br />
to differentiate among the Indian scented rice accessions,<br />
even among accessions hav<strong>in</strong>g the same varietal name<br />
but show<strong>in</strong>g similarity <strong>in</strong> a few morphological characters. Also,<br />
a general pattern of separation between aromatic and<br />
nonaromatic rice was obta<strong>in</strong>ed. RAPD is a relatively simple<br />
technique for study<strong>in</strong>g the genetic relationship among different<br />
genotypes.<br />
References<br />
Dellaporta SL, Woods J, Hicks JB. 1983. A plant DNA m<strong>in</strong>i preparation:<br />
version II. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 1:19-21.<br />
Ko HL, Cowan DC, Henry RJ, Graham GC, Blakeney AB, Lew<strong>in</strong><br />
LG. 1994. Random amplified polymorphic DNA analysis of<br />
Australian rice (Oryza sativa L.) varieties. Euphytica 80:179-<br />
189.<br />
S<strong>in</strong>gh RK, S<strong>in</strong>gh US, Khush GS. 1997. Indigenous aromatic rice of<br />
India: present scenario and needs. Agric. Situation India<br />
Nov.:491-496.<br />
Sneath PHA, Sokal RR. 1973. The pr<strong>in</strong>ciples and practice of numerical<br />
classification. San Francisco, Calif. (USA): Numerical<br />
Taxonomy Freeman.<br />
Virk PS, Newbury HJ, Jackson MT, Ford-Lloyd BV. 1995. The identification<br />
of duplicate accessions with<strong>in</strong> a rice germplasm collection<br />
us<strong>in</strong>g RAPD analysis. Theor. Appl. Genet. 90:1049-<br />
1055.<br />
Williams JGK, Kubelik AR, Livak KJ, Rafalski JA, T<strong>in</strong>gey SV. 1990.<br />
DNA polymorphisms amplified by arbitrary primers are useful<br />
as genetic markers. Nucl. Acids Res. 18:6531-6535.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ addresses: T. Stobdan, Department of Molecular Biology<br />
and Genetic Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g; V.K. Khanna, Department of <strong>Genetics</strong><br />
and Plant Breed<strong>in</strong>g; U.S. S<strong>in</strong>gh, Department of Plant<br />
Pathology, G.B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology,<br />
Pantnagar 263145, Uttar Pradesh; R.K. S<strong>in</strong>gh, <strong>IRRI</strong><br />
Liaison Office, New Delhi, India.<br />
Acknowledgments: The senior author is grateful to the Department<br />
of Biotechnology, Government of India, for provid<strong>in</strong>g a fellowship.<br />
We are also thankful to Dr. U.S. S<strong>in</strong>gh for provid<strong>in</strong>g<br />
seed materials.<br />
168 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 M 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 M<br />
Fig. 1. Amplification products<br />
from genomic DNA of 35 accessions<br />
of rice us<strong>in</strong>g primer<br />
OPC-15.<br />
Similarity coefficient<br />
0.45 0.60 0.75 0.90<br />
Pusa Basmati<br />
Pakistani Basmati<br />
Chhota Hansraj<br />
Deshi Hansraj<br />
Nagisa-12<br />
Taraori Basmati<br />
Dehraduni Basmati<br />
Type-3<br />
Type-23<br />
B<strong>in</strong>dli<br />
Khakha-7<br />
Kasturi<br />
Gaurav<br />
Tapovan-45<br />
Brown Basmati<br />
Kalanamak<br />
Tilak Chandan<br />
Sonachur<br />
Basmati-370 (5107)<br />
Basmati-370 (5401)<br />
Basmati-370 (4437)<br />
Dehraduni Basmati (4034)<br />
Dehraduni Basmati (4035)<br />
Tapovan-17<br />
Tapovan-13<br />
Tapovan-16<br />
Tapovan-21<br />
Tapovan-5<br />
Tapovan-6<br />
Khushboo<br />
Sugandha<br />
Azucena<br />
Pant Dhan-4<br />
Pant Dhan-12<br />
Jaya<br />
Fig. 2. Genetic variation <strong>in</strong> 35 genotypes of aromatic rice.<br />
Genetic diversity, evolution, and alien <strong>in</strong>trogression 169
Relationship between heterosis <strong>in</strong> F 1<br />
hybrids and genetic<br />
similarity among parents as measured by RAPD, SSR,<br />
and co-ancestry analysis <strong>in</strong> japonica rice<br />
H.J. Koh, C.W. Park, and J.H. Lee<br />
The relationship between genetic similarity (GS) and performance/heterosis <strong>in</strong> F 1<br />
hybrids among 10 japonica varieties was<br />
<strong>in</strong>vestigated. A diallel set of 45 crosses among 10 varieties was made. The 45 F 1<br />
s and their 10 parents were evaluated <strong>in</strong><br />
replicated trials <strong>in</strong> the field. GS among parents was estimated us<strong>in</strong>g 85 simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers, 129 random<br />
amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) primers, and co-ancestry analysis. There were significant positive correlations among<br />
genetic similarities based on three measures. Correlations between GS and yield heterosis were not consistent among three<br />
GS measures. SSR-based GS was found to be the most applicable to predict yield heterosis or performance <strong>in</strong> the F 1<br />
. However,<br />
GSs by 13 selected RAPD primers showed much higher correlation coefficients than GSs by a total of 129 primers and by SSR<br />
markers. This suggested that bands amplified with 13 selected RAPD primers should be associated with loci conferr<strong>in</strong>g heterosis<br />
or performance <strong>in</strong> the F 1<br />
. The relative efficiency of three GS measures for prediction of yield heterosis <strong>in</strong> the F 1<br />
is also<br />
discussed <strong>in</strong> this paper.<br />
Prediction of heterosis is important for hybrid breed<strong>in</strong>g programs<br />
<strong>in</strong> crops. Screen<strong>in</strong>g F 1 hybrid comb<strong>in</strong>ations for superior<br />
performance and strong heterosis is the most costly and timeconsum<strong>in</strong>g<br />
process <strong>in</strong> a hybrid rice breed<strong>in</strong>g program. If a<br />
simple, efficient, <strong>in</strong>expensive, and reliable method could be<br />
used to predict heterosis prior to extensive field test<strong>in</strong>g, much<br />
of the field work associated with mak<strong>in</strong>g crosses and field<br />
evaluation could be elim<strong>in</strong>ated. The level of genetic similarity<br />
between two parents has been proposed as a possible predictor<br />
of F 1 performance and heterosis. Usually, a hybrid between<br />
parents with a low level of genetic similarity shows a high<br />
level of performance and heterosis (Ahn et al 1998, Saghai<br />
Maroof et al 1997, Xiao et al 1996, Zhang et al 1996, Virmani<br />
1994).<br />
In this study, random amplified polymorphic DNAs<br />
(RAPDs), simple sequence repeats (SSRs), and co-ancestry<br />
coefficient analysis were employed to evaluate the genetic similarity<br />
among 10 japonica varieties or l<strong>in</strong>es. The relationship of<br />
genetic similarity with yield of hybrids and heterosis was exam<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
to assess whether such an analysis is useful to predict<br />
F 1 yield and heterosis <strong>in</strong> japonica rice.<br />
Materials and methods<br />
Ten japonica varieties, Chucheongbyeo, Nagdongbyeo,<br />
Dongj<strong>in</strong>byeo, J<strong>in</strong>mibyeo, Ilpumbyeo, Yeongnambyeo,<br />
S<strong>in</strong>geumobyeo, Ilmibyeo, Hwacheong waxy, and Nipponbare,<br />
were used as parents. A diallel set of 45 crosses among 10<br />
parents (exclud<strong>in</strong>g reciprocals) was made. The 45 F 1 hybrids<br />
with the 10 parents were grown for yield evaluation <strong>in</strong> a field<br />
<strong>in</strong> a randomized complete block design with two replications<br />
<strong>in</strong> summer 1998 at the College of Agriculture and Life Sciences.<br />
The plot size was 1.5 m 2 .<br />
A set of 129 random decamer primers (Operon Tech.)<br />
was used. Amplification reactions were <strong>in</strong> a f<strong>in</strong>al volume of<br />
25 µL conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g 20 ng of genomic DNA, 10 pmol of primer,<br />
2.5 mM dNTP 2 µL, 1U of Taq DNA polymerase, 2.5 µL of<br />
10X buffer, and 15 mM MgCl 2 2 µL. Samples were amplified<br />
through 45 cycles of 1 m<strong>in</strong> at 94 °C, 2 m<strong>in</strong> at 37 °C, and 2 m<strong>in</strong><br />
at 72 °C, followed by a f<strong>in</strong>al extension at 72 °C for 10 m<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong><br />
a PTC-100 TM Programmable Thermal Controller (MJ Research).<br />
Amplified products were resolved by electrophoresis<br />
<strong>in</strong> 1.4% agarose gels.<br />
The 85 rice SSR markers provided by Dr. McCouch of<br />
Cornell University were used. Polymerase cha<strong>in</strong> reaction (PCR)<br />
was performed with a mixture of 100 ng of genomic DNA,<br />
primer <strong>in</strong> 0.2 µmol buffer, 200 µmol each of dATP, dTTP,<br />
dGTP, and dCTP, 50 mM KCl, 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.3),<br />
0.01% gelat<strong>in</strong>, 1.5 mM MgCl 2 , and 1U of Taq DNA polymerase.<br />
PCR was done through 35 cycles of 1 m<strong>in</strong> at 94 °C, 1<br />
m<strong>in</strong> at 55 °C, and 2 m<strong>in</strong> at 72 °C, with a f<strong>in</strong>al extension at 72<br />
°C for 5 m<strong>in</strong>. Each reaction was run on a 4% polyacrylamide<br />
sequenc<strong>in</strong>g gel and silver-sta<strong>in</strong>ed as described <strong>in</strong> Panaud et al<br />
(1996).<br />
Band patterns for RAPD and SSR markers were recorded<br />
for each parent by assign<strong>in</strong>g a letter to each band. Band profiles<br />
for each parent were assigned 1 to <strong>in</strong>dicate the presence<br />
and 0 to <strong>in</strong>dicate the absence of a band. The genetic similarity<br />
among 10 parents was estimated us<strong>in</strong>g the NTSYS-PC program.<br />
Co-ancestry coefficients among 10 parents were calculated<br />
by l<strong>in</strong>eage analysis. Genetic relatedness between parents<br />
and offspr<strong>in</strong>g was scored 1/2. The co-ancestry coefficient between<br />
two varieties sums up the genetic relatedness along l<strong>in</strong>eage<br />
paths ly<strong>in</strong>g between two varieties. If two varieties had no<br />
common ancestor at all, the coefficient was 0.<br />
Heterosis was evaluated with two commonly used measurements:<br />
mid-parent heterosis (MP) and better-parent (BP)<br />
heterosis; mid-parent heterosis = [(F 1 – MP) / MP] × 100 (%),<br />
170 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
Table 1. Genetic similarity among 10 parents based on RAPD (lower diagonal) and SSR analysis (upper<br />
diagonal).<br />
Parent 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10<br />
1 0.762 0.726 0.690 0.735 0.711 0.607 0.631 0.630 0.771<br />
2 0.929 0.776 0.671 0.762 0.798 0.682 0.729 0.768 0.810<br />
3 0.889 0.907 0.682 0.702 0.893 0.647 0.824 0.756 0.762<br />
4 0.911 0.900 0.874 0.738 0.702 0.659 0.659 0.695 0.750<br />
5 0.918 0.916 0.881 0.915 0.735 0.583 0.738 0.642 0.723<br />
6 0.880 0.899 0.907 0.878 0.872 0.631 0.845 0.778 0.771<br />
7 0.885 0.904 0.886 0.891 0.890 0.874 0.635 0.695 0.655<br />
8 0.850 0.860 0.885 0.844 0.830 0.929 0.848 0.744 0.714<br />
9 0.867 0.878 0.844 0.853 0.864 0.835 0.865 0.818 0.716<br />
10 0.912 0.922 0.908 0.896 0.899 0.875 0.892 0.865 0.870<br />
1 = Chucheongbyeo, 2 = Nakdongbyeo, 3 = Dongj<strong>in</strong>byeo, 4 = J<strong>in</strong>mibyeo, 5 = Ilpumbyeo, 6 = Yeongnambyeo, 7 = S<strong>in</strong>geumobyeo,<br />
8 = Ilmibyeo, 9 = Hwacheong waxy, 10 = Nipponbare.<br />
Table 2. Co-ancestry coefficients based on pedigree records among parents.<br />
Parent 1 a 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9<br />
2 0<br />
3 0.0625 0.25<br />
4 0 0.0938 0.0234<br />
5 0 0.0625 0.0156 0.3047<br />
6 0.0313 0.1484 0.5059 0.0938 0.0840<br />
7 0 0.2520 0.0630 0.0381 0.0923 0.0447<br />
8 0.0156 0.0977 0.2588 0.0476 0.0430 0.5031 0.0233<br />
9 0 0.2734 0.0684 0.0420 0.0303 0.0452 0.0682 0.0226<br />
10 0 0.0625 0.0156 0.0938 0.0781 0.1484 0.0547 0.0745 0.0293<br />
a Parental codes are as shown <strong>in</strong> Table 1.<br />
better-parent heterosis = [(F 1 – BP) / BP] × 100 (%). The correlations<br />
between genetic similarities and F 1 yield/its heterosis<br />
were evaluated.<br />
Results and discussion<br />
Of 129 primers used to amplify genomic DNA from 10 parents,<br />
98 (76%) primers revealed polymorphism among the<br />
parents. The 129 primers produced a total of 542 bands, with<br />
an average of 4.2; 230 (42%) bands showed polymorphism.<br />
Genetic similarities among 10 parents based on RAPDs are<br />
presented <strong>in</strong> Table 1. The 85 SSR markers used <strong>in</strong> this study<br />
produced 1–21 alleles per marker among 10 parents, with an<br />
average of 5.7. Genetic similarities based on SSR markers are<br />
also shown (Table 1). Pedigree records of 10 parents were<br />
tracked and thus co-ancestry coefficients were obta<strong>in</strong>ed (Table<br />
2). Genetic similarities among parents were 0.818–0.929 by<br />
RAPD, 0.583–0.893 by SSR, and 0–0.5059 by co-ancestry<br />
analysis. In co-ancestry analysis, there was a limitation <strong>in</strong><br />
search<strong>in</strong>g for full l<strong>in</strong>eages among parents because of miss<strong>in</strong>g<br />
records <strong>in</strong> the past, and thus the coefficients were generally<br />
low; otherwise, they were similar to GS by two other methods.<br />
The GS range by RAPD was much narrower than by SSR analysis.<br />
Table 3 shows the relationship among GSs estimated by<br />
the three methods. The GSs exhibited significantly positive<br />
Table 3. Correlation coefficients among parents based on analysis<br />
by 129 RAPD primers, 85 SSR primers, and pedigree record of parents.<br />
Genetic similarities among parents based on<br />
129 RAPD SSR a (B) Pedigree<br />
primers (A) record (C)<br />
A 0.343* 0.360*<br />
B 0.587**<br />
a * = significant at the 5% level, ** = significant at the 1% level.<br />
correlations, <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g that any of them could be used for GS<br />
estimation. However, s<strong>in</strong>ce the correlation coefficients were<br />
not so high, exceptions <strong>in</strong> GS estimates by the three methods<br />
may have arisen.<br />
Table 4 shows the means and ranges of gra<strong>in</strong> yield per<br />
10 plants and the heterosis of 45 F 1 hybrids. MP heterosis<br />
ranged from –3.8% (Nagdongbyeo/Ilmibyeo) to 18.7%<br />
(Chucheongbyeo/S<strong>in</strong>geumobyeo), whereas BP heterosis ranged<br />
from –10.5% (J<strong>in</strong>mibyeo/Ilpumbyeo) to 14.2%<br />
(Yeongnambyeo/Nipponbare). The extent of heterosis <strong>in</strong> this<br />
study was relatively lower as expected <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>tervarietal japonica<br />
hybrids (Virmani 1994).<br />
The correlation of GS based on RAPDs, SSRs, and coancestry<br />
coefficients with gra<strong>in</strong> yield and its heterosis <strong>in</strong> 45<br />
Genetic diversity, evolution, and alien <strong>in</strong>trogression 171
Table 4. Means and ranges of yield and its heterosis <strong>in</strong> 45 F 1 hybrids.<br />
Gra<strong>in</strong> yield (kg 10 plots –1 ) MPH a (%) BPH (%)<br />
Mean Range Mean Range Mean Range<br />
299.5 258.2–353.8 6.1 –3.8–18.7 –0.4 –10.5–14.2<br />
a MPH = mid-parent heterosis, BPH = better-parent heterosis.<br />
Table 5. Correlation coefficients between hybrid performance <strong>in</strong> gra<strong>in</strong> yield and GS estimated by RAPDs,<br />
SSRs, and co-ancestry coefficients <strong>in</strong> 45 F 1 hybrids.<br />
RAPD analysis SSR analysis a Co-ancestry coefficient<br />
Yield MPH BPH Yield MPH BPH Yield MPH BPH<br />
–0.177 –0.016 –0.071 –0.690** –0.397** –0.373* –0.304* –0.301* –0.263<br />
a ** = significant at the 1% level, * = significant at the 5% level.<br />
hybrids was estimated (Table 5). GS by SSRs was correlated<br />
with hybrid yield and both MP and BP heterosis, suggest<strong>in</strong>g<br />
that GS among parents based on SSR analysis could be a valuable<br />
criterion to predict hybrid performance. However, GS by<br />
RAPDs was not correlated with hybrid performance. In the<br />
co-ancestry coefficient, there was a significant correlation between<br />
GS and hybrid yield/MP heterosis, but not between GS<br />
and BP heterosis. This <strong>in</strong>dicated that GS by RAPD and coancestry<br />
analysis was not an effective predictor of hybrid performance.<br />
However, GS by co-ancestry analysis may be significantly<br />
correlated with hybrid performance if the records of<br />
l<strong>in</strong>eage relationships among all the parents could be provided.<br />
For further analysis with RAPDs, we estimated the GSs<br />
among parents based on <strong>in</strong>dividual primers and correlated them<br />
with hybrid performances. Consequently, among 98 RAPD<br />
primers, which revealed polymorphism among parents, 13 were<br />
selected to produce the bands that showed significant correlation<br />
between GS and yield and its heterosis. Us<strong>in</strong>g these 13<br />
primers, the GS among parents was reestimated and correlations<br />
were analyzed between GS and hybrid performance.<br />
Unlike previous results with all RAPD primers, the GS measured<br />
by 13 selected RAPD primers exhibited a significant<br />
correlation with hybrid yield (r = –0.743**) and its heterosis<br />
(MP, r = –0.455**, and BP, r = –0.398**). This correlation<br />
coefficient was higher than by SSR. This result contrasted with<br />
the previous one shown <strong>in</strong> Table 5, <strong>in</strong> which GS by all the<br />
RAPD primers was not correlated with hybrid performance.<br />
Therefore, it was <strong>in</strong>ferred that there should be loci associated<br />
with hybrid performance, yield, and heterosis, and that the 13<br />
selected RAPD primers produced the polymorphic bands<br />
among parents related to the heterotic loci. If this is true, then<br />
more loci affect<strong>in</strong>g hybrid performance should be identified<br />
so that prediction of hybrid performance us<strong>in</strong>g DNA markers<br />
could be practically applied to hybrid rice breed<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
References<br />
Ahn SN, Kwak TS, Kang KH, Jeon YH, Choi HC, Moon HP. 1998.<br />
Relationship between heterosis and genetic distance as measured<br />
by RAPDs analysis <strong>in</strong> rice. Kor. J. Breed. 30(1):16-23.<br />
Panaud O, Chen X, McCouch SR. 1996. Development of<br />
microsatellite markers and characterization of simple sequence<br />
length polymorphism (SSLP) <strong>in</strong> rice (Oryza sativa L.). Mol.<br />
Gen. Genet. 252:597-607.<br />
Saghai Maroof MA, Yang GP, Zhang Q, Gravois KA. 1997. Correlation<br />
between molecular marker distance and hybrid performance<br />
<strong>in</strong> U.S. southern long gra<strong>in</strong> rice. Crop Sci. 37:145-<br />
150.<br />
Virmani SS. 1994. Heterosis and hybrid rice breed<strong>in</strong>g. Berl<strong>in</strong> (Germany):<br />
Spr<strong>in</strong>ger-Verlag. 189 p.<br />
Xiao J, Li J, Yuan L, McCouch SR, Tanksley SD. 1996. Genetic<br />
diversity and its relationship to hybrid performance and heterosis<br />
<strong>in</strong> rice as revealed by PCR-based markers. Theor. Appl.<br />
Genet. 92:637-643.<br />
Zhang Q, Saghai Maroof MA, Yang GP, Liu KD, Zhou ZQ, Gravois<br />
KA, Xu CG, Gao YJ. 1996. Relationships between molecular<br />
marker polymorphism and hybrid performance <strong>in</strong> rice. <strong>Rice</strong><br />
genetics III. Los Baños (Philipp<strong>in</strong>es): <strong>International</strong> <strong>Rice</strong> Research<br />
Institute. p 317-326.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ address: School of Plant Science, College of Agriculture<br />
and Life Science, Seoul National University, Suwon 441-744,<br />
Korea.<br />
172 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
Reproductive barriers between japonica and <strong>in</strong>dica crosses<br />
Y. Harushima, M. Nakagahra, M. Yano, T. Sasaki, and N. Kurata<br />
In a cross between japonica and <strong>in</strong>dica rice cultivars, several segregation distortions caused by many k<strong>in</strong>ds of reproductive<br />
barriers were observed <strong>in</strong> the progenies. We developed a new method for mapp<strong>in</strong>g all k<strong>in</strong>ds of reproductive barriers. This is the<br />
first report of a genome-wide survey of all reproductive barriers. Reproductive barriers were analyzed <strong>in</strong> three crosses: Nipponbare/<br />
Kasalath (NK), FL087/Dao Ren Qiao (FD), and FL1007/K<strong>in</strong>andang Puti (FK). The frequency of each allele <strong>in</strong> the whole genome<br />
was well expla<strong>in</strong>ed by the number of reproductive barriers: 33 <strong>in</strong> NK, 32 <strong>in</strong> FD, and 37 <strong>in</strong> FK. Consider<strong>in</strong>g the position and<br />
whether they were gametophytic or zygotic, at least 84 out of 102 barriers detected <strong>in</strong> the three crosses were at different loci.<br />
There is no common barrier <strong>in</strong> the three crosses. The reproductive barriers between japonica and <strong>in</strong>dica rice detected <strong>in</strong> this<br />
study have probably developed after differentiation of cultivars <strong>in</strong>to japonica and <strong>in</strong>dica.<br />
Differences <strong>in</strong> F 1 seed fertility between japonica and <strong>in</strong>dica<br />
crosses and many reproductive barriers have been reported<br />
(Oka 1988, K<strong>in</strong>oshita 1995). However, the nature of the reproductive<br />
barriers between the two types of cultivars is not<br />
clearly understood. Questions such as how many barriers are<br />
between them and whether there is a common barrier between<br />
them are not answered satisfactorily. Historically, the number<br />
and location of reproductive barriers are estimated by observ<strong>in</strong>g<br />
the association between sterility or segregation distortion<br />
and mapped morphological or biochemical trait loci. However,<br />
the recent identification of DNA markers cover<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
whole genome has enabled genome-wide surveys of reproductive<br />
barriers <strong>in</strong> a cross. A simple analysis of the F 2 seed fertility<br />
as quantitative trait loci (OTLs) cannot expla<strong>in</strong> the differences<br />
<strong>in</strong> F 1 seed fertility <strong>in</strong> each cross or the segregation distortions<br />
<strong>in</strong> the F 2 population. Segregation distortion is a feature<br />
of all genetic reproductive barriers. To date, no quantitative<br />
methods are available to estimate the number, location,<br />
and strength of reproductive barriers us<strong>in</strong>g segregation characteristics<br />
of marker genotypes.<br />
A new method for characteriz<strong>in</strong>g reproductive barriers<br />
us<strong>in</strong>g segregat<strong>in</strong>g allele frequencies <strong>in</strong> an F 2 population was<br />
presented and applied to the <strong>in</strong>traspecific cross between<br />
japonica and <strong>in</strong>dica rice varieties. A multiresponse nonl<strong>in</strong>ear<br />
regression analysis was performed to estimate the number,<br />
position, and strength of the reproductive barriers on each chromosome.<br />
The best-fit mathematical model was selected to describe<br />
the experimental observations of the allele frequencies<br />
of the DNA markers.<br />
Materials and methods<br />
Plant material and map construction<br />
Nipponbare is a japonica cultivar. Kasalath, Dao Ren Qiao,<br />
and K<strong>in</strong>andang Puti are <strong>in</strong>dica cultivars from India, Ch<strong>in</strong>a, and<br />
the Philipp<strong>in</strong>es, respectively. FL1087 and FL1007 are japonica<br />
marker l<strong>in</strong>es developed by Kyushu University (Fukuoka, Japan),<br />
which correspond to FL102 and FL7, respectively. All<br />
three F 2 populations from crosses between Nipponbare and<br />
Kasalath (NK), between FL1087 and Dao Ren Qiao (FD), and<br />
between FL1007 and K<strong>in</strong>andang Puti (FK) were produced by<br />
self-poll<strong>in</strong>ation of F 1 plants produced by cross<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dica varieties<br />
with japonica varieties. The seed fertility of NK F 1 plants<br />
was full and that of FD and FK plants was about half. Two<br />
l<strong>in</strong>kage maps were constructed previously us<strong>in</strong>g 186, 94, and<br />
93 F 2 plants from NK, FD, and FK, respectively (Antonio et al<br />
1996, Harushima et al 1998). The allele frequencies of 1,055,<br />
236, and 222 DNA markers at different positions were used<br />
for the regression analysis of NK, FD, and FK maps, respectively.<br />
Common markers between NK and FD were 206 and<br />
those between NK and FK were 190.<br />
Mathematical models for regression<br />
The <strong>in</strong>fluence of a reproductive barrier on the genotype frequency<br />
of l<strong>in</strong>ked markers depends on whether the reproductive<br />
barrier acts <strong>in</strong> a gametophyte or a zygote. The simplest<br />
model is a reproductive barrier affect<strong>in</strong>g the gametophyte. A<br />
s<strong>in</strong>gle reproductive barrier alters the allele transmission rate<br />
(t1) of parent A at the barrier location (x1) on a chromosome <strong>in</strong><br />
the male (or female) gametophyte. The t1 can vary from 0 to 1<br />
and Mendelian segregation is 0.5. The probability of transmitt<strong>in</strong>g<br />
an A genotype at x locus <strong>in</strong> the gametophyte can be expressed<br />
as<br />
(1 – θ1)t1 + θ1(1 – t1)<br />
where θ1 is the recomb<strong>in</strong>ation frequency between x and x1 and<br />
θ1 can be expressed by the Kosambi map function, θ1 = ½<br />
Tanh (2|x – x1) (Kosambi 1944). The probability of transmitt<strong>in</strong>g<br />
another genotype, B, at x <strong>in</strong> the gametophyte can be expressed<br />
as<br />
θ1t1 + (1 – θ1)(1 – t1)<br />
The expected frequencies of the homozygous genotype,<br />
A, the homozygous genotype, B, and the heterozygote, H, are<br />
computed as follows:<br />
1<br />
1<br />
1<br />
A = (t1 + θ1 – 2t1θ1), B = (1 – t1 – θ1 + 2t1θ1), H =<br />
2<br />
2<br />
2 (1)<br />
Genetic diversity, evolution, and alien <strong>in</strong>trogression 173
In the case of a s<strong>in</strong>gle zygotic viability barrier, the barrier<br />
alters the zygotic viabilities. The relative viabilities of B<br />
and the heterozygote to the other genotype, A, are Vb and Vh,<br />
respectively. The viabilities of A, B, and H at x can be expressed<br />
as<br />
Vax = (1 – θv) 2 + 2θv)(1 – θv)Vh + θv 2 Vb, Vbx =<br />
θv 2 + 2θv(1 – θv)Vh + (1 – θv) 2 Vb, Vhx = θv(1 – θv) +<br />
{(1 – θv) 2 + θv 2 }Vh + θv(1 –θv) Vb<br />
where θv is the probability of recomb<strong>in</strong>ation between x and x v .<br />
The expected frequencies of the homozygous genotype A, the<br />
homozygous genotype B, and the heterozygote H are calculated<br />
as follows:<br />
where Agx, Bgx, and Hgx are the expected frequency of each<br />
genotype by gametophytic barriers, and 0.25, 0.25, and 0.5<br />
are expected without gametophytic barriers, respectively. We<br />
have extended the mathematical models of more complicated<br />
cases to expla<strong>in</strong> the observed segregation distortions on a chromosome.<br />
The regression analyses were performed on a<br />
Mac<strong>in</strong>tosh computer us<strong>in</strong>g orig<strong>in</strong>al programs developed from<br />
Mathematica packages.<br />
Results and discussion<br />
Agx<br />
A = ,<br />
Agx + Vbx Bgx + Vhx Hgx<br />
Vbx Bgx<br />
B = ,<br />
Agx + Vbx Bgx + Vhx Hgx<br />
Vhx Hgx<br />
H = ,<br />
Agx + Vbx Bgx + Vhx Hgx<br />
Regression analysis<br />
The genotype segregation of adjacently l<strong>in</strong>ked markers tends<br />
to be similar. Hence, when the frequency of each allele <strong>in</strong> the<br />
F 2 plants is plotted along a high-density l<strong>in</strong>kage map, three<br />
cont<strong>in</strong>uous series of allele frequencies are obta<strong>in</strong>ed for each<br />
chromosome, correspond<strong>in</strong>g to the genotypes of the heterozygote<br />
and each of the two possible homozygotes. A<br />
multiresponse nonl<strong>in</strong>ear regression method was used to analyze<br />
segregation distortions <strong>in</strong> allele frequency. In the regression<br />
analysis, mathematical models were fitted to the observed<br />
frequencies of alleles on an entire chromosome. Thus, the regression<br />
analysis was able to identify the positions of the reproductive<br />
barriers and dist<strong>in</strong>guish between gametophytic and<br />
zygotic barriers and hence characterize the segregation distortions<br />
of allele frequencies <strong>in</strong> the F 2 population.<br />
The allele frequencies of DNA markers were measured<br />
<strong>in</strong> F 2 populations from the three crosses (NK, FD, and FK),<br />
and plotted along their genetic l<strong>in</strong>kage maps. Deviations from<br />
the expected Mendelian segregation ratios (25% for each homozygote<br />
and 50% for the heterozygote) were observed for<br />
(2)<br />
all chromosomes <strong>in</strong> the three crosses for chromosome 7 <strong>in</strong> FD.<br />
Regression analysis was performed for each chromosome. The<br />
observed allele frequencies, the best regression curves of each<br />
allele frequency, and the estimated barrier locations on chromosomes<br />
1, 2, and 3 <strong>in</strong> each cross are presented <strong>in</strong> Figure 1.<br />
The distortions <strong>in</strong> allele segregation frequencies on each chromosome<br />
were well expla<strong>in</strong>ed by one to four reproductive barriers.<br />
The frequencies of each allele <strong>in</strong> a whole genome were<br />
well expla<strong>in</strong>ed by 33 barriers, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g 15 gametophytic barriers<br />
and 18 zygotic barriers <strong>in</strong> NK. Thirty-two barriers (15<br />
gametophytic and 17 zygotic) and 37 barriers (19 gametophytic<br />
and 18 zygotic) could expla<strong>in</strong> the segregation frequencies <strong>in</strong><br />
FD and FK, respectively.<br />
Comparisons among three crosses<br />
To exam<strong>in</strong>e the possibility of common barriers ly<strong>in</strong>g between<br />
japonica and <strong>in</strong>dica rice cultivars, the positions of the reproductive<br />
barriers detected <strong>in</strong> FD and FK were estimated on the<br />
NK map us<strong>in</strong>g markers common with those of the NK map<br />
and superimposed on it (Fig. 2). We exam<strong>in</strong>ed the possibility<br />
of reproductive barriers common <strong>in</strong> any two of these crosses,<br />
consider<strong>in</strong>g not only the position of the barrier but also whether<br />
it was gametophytic or zygotic. Seven pairs of gametophytic<br />
barriers and 11 pairs of zygotic barriers <strong>in</strong> 14 regions may be<br />
reproductive barriers common to two crosses (<strong>in</strong>dicated by the<br />
boxes <strong>in</strong> Fig. 2). At least 84 out of 102 barriers detected <strong>in</strong> this<br />
study were at different loci among three crosses. Because there<br />
are few common barriers <strong>in</strong> this study, most of the reproductive<br />
barriers between japonica and <strong>in</strong>dica rice detected here<br />
would be formed after differentiation of the cultivars <strong>in</strong>to<br />
japonica and <strong>in</strong>dica. Artificial selection and the change from<br />
outbreed<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>in</strong>breed<strong>in</strong>g dur<strong>in</strong>g the cultivation process may<br />
promote the formation of reproductive barriers between cultivars.<br />
Isolation and characterization of the reproductive barriers<br />
detected here would help elucidate the molecular mechanisms<br />
beh<strong>in</strong>d the rapid formation of reproductive barriers.<br />
References<br />
Antonio BA, Inoue T, Kajiya H, Nagamura Y, Kurata N, M<strong>in</strong>obe Y,<br />
Yano M, Nakagahra M, Sasaki T. 1996. Comparison of genetic<br />
distance and order of DNA markers <strong>in</strong> five populations<br />
of rice. Genome 39:946-956.<br />
Harushima Y, Yano M, Shomura A, Sato M, Shimano T, Kuboki Y,<br />
Yamamoto T, L<strong>in</strong> SY, Antonio BA, Paroco A, Kajiya H, Huang<br />
N, Yamamoto K, Nagamura Y, Kurata N, Khush GS, Sasaki<br />
T. 1998. A high-density rice genetic l<strong>in</strong>kage map with 2275<br />
markers us<strong>in</strong>g a s<strong>in</strong>gle F 2 population. <strong>Genetics</strong> 148:479-494.<br />
K<strong>in</strong>oshita T. 1995. Report of committee on gene symbolization, nomenclature<br />
and l<strong>in</strong>kage groups. <strong>Rice</strong> Genet. Newsl. 12:9-153.<br />
Kosambi DD. 1944. The estimation of map distances from recomb<strong>in</strong>ation<br />
values. Ann. Eugen., Lond. 12:172-175.<br />
Oka HI. 1988. Orig<strong>in</strong> of cultivated rice. Japan Scientific Societies<br />
Press, Tokyo/Elsevier Science Pub., Amsterdam (Netherlands).<br />
p 156-159.<br />
174 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
Frequency of genotype<br />
50<br />
Chromosome 1<br />
Japonica homozygous<br />
Indica homozygous<br />
Heterozygous<br />
50<br />
Chromosome 2<br />
50<br />
Chromosome 3<br />
25<br />
25<br />
25<br />
0 0 50 100 150<br />
0<br />
0<br />
50 100 150<br />
0<br />
0<br />
50 100 150<br />
50<br />
50<br />
50<br />
25<br />
25<br />
25<br />
0<br />
0<br />
50 100 150<br />
0<br />
0<br />
50 100 150<br />
0<br />
0<br />
50 100 150<br />
75<br />
50<br />
50<br />
50<br />
25<br />
25<br />
25<br />
0<br />
0<br />
50 100 150<br />
0<br />
0<br />
50 100 150<br />
0<br />
0<br />
50 100 150<br />
Distance (cM)<br />
Fig. 1. Frequencies of each allele on chromosomes 1, 2, and 3 <strong>in</strong> NK, FD, and FK are plotted along their genetic l<strong>in</strong>kage maps.<br />
For each chromosome, the left and right ends correspond to the short and long arms of the genetic l<strong>in</strong>kage maps. The frequencies<br />
of japonica homozygous genotypes, <strong>in</strong>dica homozygous genotypes, and heterozygous genotypes of the <strong>in</strong>dividual markers<br />
that were mapped at different locations are plotted at the marker positions. The best regression curves of each allele frequency<br />
on the chromosome are also presented. The arrows show the locations of reproductive barriers. The upward and downward<br />
arrows <strong>in</strong>dicate the position of gametophytic barriers that <strong>in</strong>crease the japonica and <strong>in</strong>dica genotype, respectively. The<br />
gametophytic barriers affect<strong>in</strong>g male and female tissues on the same chromosome are noted by different vertical arrows<br />
positioned above the chromosome axis. For example, at 150 cM on chromosome 1, two gametophytic barriers affect male and<br />
female gametes. Arrows po<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g both ways <strong>in</strong>dicate the position of barriers that affect zygotic viability.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ addresses: Y. Harushima and N. Kurata, Plant <strong>Genetics</strong><br />
Laboratory, National Institute of <strong>Genetics</strong>, Yata, Mishima,<br />
Japan; M. Nakagahra, National Agriculture Research Center,<br />
Kannondai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan; M. Yano and T. Sasaki,<br />
<strong>Rice</strong> Genome Research Program, National Institute of<br />
Agrobiological Resources, Forestry, and Fisheries, Kannondai,<br />
Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8602, Japan.<br />
Genetic diversity, evolution, and alien <strong>in</strong>trogression 175
cM<br />
0<br />
1S 2S 3S 4S 5S 6S 7S 8S 9S 10S 11S 12S<br />
cM<br />
0<br />
25<br />
25<br />
50<br />
50<br />
75<br />
75<br />
10L<br />
100<br />
9L<br />
100<br />
125<br />
4L<br />
5L<br />
6L<br />
7L<br />
8L<br />
11L<br />
12L<br />
125<br />
150<br />
2L<br />
175<br />
3L<br />
1L<br />
200<br />
Fig. 2. The locations of reproductive barriers <strong>in</strong> three japonica-<strong>in</strong>dica crosses were coord<strong>in</strong>ated on the rice genetic l<strong>in</strong>kage map constructed<br />
us<strong>in</strong>g NK. The red, green, and blue arrows represent reproductive barriers detected <strong>in</strong> NK, FD, and FK, respectively. The respective<br />
locations of reproductive barriers detected <strong>in</strong> crosses other than NK were estimated by markers common to the NK map. The<br />
locations of common markers were <strong>in</strong>dicated as black l<strong>in</strong>es on the map. The arrows po<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g right and left <strong>in</strong>dicate the location of barriers<br />
that enable the gametophyte to <strong>in</strong>crease the japonica and <strong>in</strong>dica genotype, respectively. The gametophytic barriers affect<strong>in</strong>g male and<br />
female tissues on the same chromosome are <strong>in</strong>dicated by different arrow positions on the chromosome map. The arrows po<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g both<br />
ways are locations of zygotic barriers. Boxed arrows <strong>in</strong>dicate the possibility of f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g allelic barriers for various crosses. S = short arm,<br />
L = long arm.<br />
Genetic basis of F 1<br />
hybrid sterility and gamete<br />
formation <strong>in</strong> rice<br />
R. Suzuki, N. Sawamura, T. Okazawa, Kh<strong>in</strong>-Thidar, and Y. Sano<br />
The genetic basis of F 1<br />
hybrid sterility was compared <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>ter- and <strong>in</strong>traspecific crosses us<strong>in</strong>g near-isogenic l<strong>in</strong>es (NILs).<br />
Although F 1<br />
hybrid semisterility is frequently caused by allelic <strong>in</strong>teraction <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>terspecific crosses, the genic actions were<br />
divergent. The gamete elim<strong>in</strong>ator, S6, was detected <strong>in</strong> three stra<strong>in</strong>s of Oryza rufipogon. S6 caused abortion of both female and<br />
male gametes carry<strong>in</strong>g S6-a from japonica rice only <strong>in</strong> the heterozygote. S6-n, which <strong>in</strong>duces no <strong>in</strong>fertility <strong>in</strong> comb<strong>in</strong>ation with<br />
S6 and S6-a, was widely distributed <strong>in</strong> wild stra<strong>in</strong>s as well as <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>dica type. Another gamete elim<strong>in</strong>ator, S1, was detected <strong>in</strong> O.<br />
glaberrima; S1 behaved like S6. To compare the genic effects by gamete elim<strong>in</strong>ator (S1 and S6), histological <strong>in</strong>vestigations<br />
were carried out. Results showed that S1 caused abnormal divisions <strong>in</strong> both mega- and microgametogenesis; however, S6<br />
caused abnormalities only <strong>in</strong> megasporogenesis. Duplicate gametic lethal genes proposed for varietal crosses with<strong>in</strong> O. sativa<br />
were also reexam<strong>in</strong>ed. Three NILs showed only pollen <strong>in</strong>fertility when crossed with the recurrent parent; however, an F 1<br />
between<br />
the NILs gave reduced spikelet fertility, suggest<strong>in</strong>g that the accumulation of F 1<br />
-pollen-semisterility genes affected female<br />
fertility.<br />
176 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
Table 1. Distribution of three alleles at the S6 locus <strong>in</strong> wild and<br />
cultivated rice stra<strong>in</strong>s. a Stra<strong>in</strong>s (no.) with L<strong>in</strong>es<br />
Species Type exam<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
S6 S6-a S6-n (no.)<br />
O. sativa Japonica – 3 – 3<br />
Indica – – 8 8<br />
O. rufipogon Perennial 3 1 7 11<br />
Annual – – 3 3<br />
a An allelic state of a stra<strong>in</strong> was exam<strong>in</strong>ed by cross<strong>in</strong>g with two NILs carry<strong>in</strong>g st1<br />
S6-a or st1 S6. S6-n was assumed when a stra<strong>in</strong> gave fertile F 1 plants as well as<br />
normal segregation for st1 <strong>in</strong> the F 2 of both crosses with the two NILs.<br />
A<br />
C<br />
B<br />
D<br />
AN<br />
PN<br />
EN<br />
SY<br />
<strong>Rice</strong> offers an opportunity to study the development of hybrid<br />
sterility barriers with<strong>in</strong> and between species s<strong>in</strong>ce hybrid sterility<br />
frequently appears <strong>in</strong> crosses among closely related rice<br />
taxa. Accumulated evidence shows that a complex gene system<br />
might cause this phenomenon <strong>in</strong> plants (Oka 1988, Sano<br />
1993), suggest<strong>in</strong>g that any simple model for hybrid sterility is<br />
<strong>in</strong>sufficient to understand the real situation. Two of the difficulties<br />
<strong>in</strong> its genetic analysis are that hybrid sterility behaves<br />
like a quantitative trait and F 1 hybrid sterility is not easily discrim<strong>in</strong>ated<br />
from hybrid breakdown. We compared hybrid sterility<br />
genes between and with<strong>in</strong> species by us<strong>in</strong>g near-isogenic<br />
l<strong>in</strong>es (NILs) that had been established.<br />
E<br />
F<br />
The gamete elim<strong>in</strong>ator and its distribution<br />
The gamete elim<strong>in</strong>ator causes abortion of both female and male<br />
gametes carry<strong>in</strong>g the opposite allele only <strong>in</strong> the heterozygote.<br />
This type of sterility gene was detected <strong>in</strong> backcrossed populations<br />
between Taichung 65 (T65, japonica type) and Oryza<br />
rufipogon (W593 from Malaysia, perennial type). After <strong>in</strong>troduc<strong>in</strong>g<br />
a segment of chromosome 6 from W593 <strong>in</strong>to T65, the<br />
alien segment was found to carry a gamete elim<strong>in</strong>ator, S6, which<br />
was l<strong>in</strong>ked with st1 (stipple1) and was located near the centromere<br />
on the short arm of chromosome 6 (Sano 1992).<br />
To exam<strong>in</strong>e the distribution of the alleles, two NILs of<br />
T65—A with st1 S6-a and B with st1 S6—were made <strong>in</strong> this<br />
study. Stra<strong>in</strong>s with S6 are expected to give semisterile hybrids<br />
and a distortion of st1 <strong>in</strong> the F 2 when crossed with NIL-A,<br />
whereas stra<strong>in</strong>s with S6-a are fertile when crossed with NIL-<br />
B. The different responses to the two NILs were used to exam<strong>in</strong>e<br />
the distribution <strong>in</strong> wild and cultivated rice stra<strong>in</strong>s. Cross<strong>in</strong>g<br />
experiments suggested that S6-a is predom<strong>in</strong>ant <strong>in</strong> the<br />
japonica type and S6 is distributed <strong>in</strong> perennial types of O.<br />
rufipogon. However, most stra<strong>in</strong>s (18/25), except for the<br />
japonica type, showed no difference between crosses with NIL-<br />
A and NIL-B, which might be expla<strong>in</strong>ed by an additional neutral<br />
allele, S6-n, at S6 (Table 1). A gene that <strong>in</strong>duces no <strong>in</strong>fertility<br />
<strong>in</strong> response to S6 was successfully <strong>in</strong>troduced <strong>in</strong>to T65<br />
from Patpaku (<strong>in</strong>dica type) by successive backcrosses. S<strong>in</strong>ce<br />
the gene was located near the centromere, it was assumed to<br />
be S6-n.<br />
Fig. 1. Female gametophyte development affected by two gamete<br />
elim<strong>in</strong>ators, S1 and S6. A, B, the recurrent parent; C, D, S1/S1-a,<br />
E, F, S6/S6-a. EN = egg nucleus, SY = synergid cell, PN = polar<br />
nuclei, AN = antipodal cells. A bar shows 20 µm.<br />
Histological comparisons of abnormalities caused<br />
by gamete elim<strong>in</strong>ators<br />
To look <strong>in</strong>to the genetic effects caused by gamete elim<strong>in</strong>ators,<br />
gametogenesis was <strong>in</strong>vestigated <strong>in</strong> semisterile plants caused<br />
by two different gamete elim<strong>in</strong>ators, S1 and S6, us<strong>in</strong>g NILs of<br />
T65. S1 was detected <strong>in</strong> hybrids between the two cultivated<br />
rice species, O. sativa and O. glaberrima, and it was tightly<br />
l<strong>in</strong>ked with wx (waxy) on the short arm of chromosome 6 (Sano<br />
1990). In pollen development, the heterozygotes of S1/S1-a<br />
and S6/S6-a showed a dist<strong>in</strong>ct difference, namely, <strong>in</strong> S1/S1-a,<br />
with half of the microspores deteriorat<strong>in</strong>g at the two-nucleate<br />
stage after meiosis. In S6/S6-a, no abnormality was detected<br />
<strong>in</strong> mature microspores, show<strong>in</strong>g that the two genes caused<br />
dysfunction of microspores <strong>in</strong> different stages of pollen development.<br />
Megagametogenesis was also compared between the two<br />
semisterile heterozygotes of S1/S1-a and S6/S6-a (Fig. 1). In<br />
fertile plants, the functional megaspore is divided after meiosis<br />
to form the immature eight-nucleate embryo sac. This period<br />
corresponded to the stages of 1.5–1.8 mm <strong>in</strong> anther length.<br />
At the flower<strong>in</strong>g stage, about half of the embryo sacs were<br />
aborted <strong>in</strong> the two semisterile heterozygotes of S1/S1-a and<br />
S6/S6-a, <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g that embryo sacs carry<strong>in</strong>g S1-a or S6-a<br />
were aborted. Any antipodals, polar nuclei, and synergids were<br />
not detected <strong>in</strong> aborted embryo sacs, suggest<strong>in</strong>g that abortion<br />
Genetic diversity, evolution, and alien <strong>in</strong>trogression 177
P101<br />
39.6<br />
(38.0)<br />
P98<br />
49.3<br />
(97.7)<br />
18.9<br />
(34.0)<br />
Fig. 2. Pollen and spikelet (<strong>in</strong> parentheses) fertility <strong>in</strong> F 1 hybrids<br />
between three NILs carry<strong>in</strong>g different sets of duplicate lethals.<br />
P98, P99, and P101 carry a set of duplicate lethals from Pachchaiperumal,<br />
Peh-ku, and Henan-tsao, respectively.<br />
P99<br />
crossed with each other, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g the recurrent parent (T65).<br />
P98, P99, and P101 carried a set of duplicate lethals that was<br />
<strong>in</strong>troduced from <strong>in</strong>dica types Pachchai-perumal, Peh-ku, and<br />
Henan-tsao, respectively. All the NILs gave male semisterile<br />
but female fertile plants when crossed with T65, show<strong>in</strong>g that<br />
the duplicate lethals affected only pollen development as reported.<br />
All the F 1 hybrids between the three NILs showed more<br />
severe male sterility s<strong>in</strong>ce two different sets segregated. Spikelet<br />
fertility was also high <strong>in</strong> the F 1 of P99 × P101, as expected.<br />
However, the F 1 s of P98 × P101 and P98 × P99 showed a<br />
reduced spikelet fertility (Fig. 2). Histological observations <strong>in</strong><br />
the F 1 of P98 × P101 detected no abnormality dur<strong>in</strong>g<br />
megagametogenesis. Results <strong>in</strong>dicated that duplicate lethals<br />
could <strong>in</strong>duce spikelet sterility depend<strong>in</strong>g on the genetic background,<br />
suggest<strong>in</strong>g that the discrepancies could appear <strong>in</strong> early<br />
generations of hybridization or backcrossed populations <strong>in</strong><br />
relation to their genic effects on hybrid sterility genes.<br />
might have occurred at the early stage of megagametogenesis<br />
(Fig. 1D, F). Histological observations revealed that abnormality<br />
occurred <strong>in</strong> immature one- or two-nucleate embryo sacs<br />
(Fig. 1C, E). Results <strong>in</strong>dicated that the manner of cell division<br />
affected by S6 differed markedly between the formation of<br />
female and male gametes.<br />
Duplicate lethals <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>dica-japonica crosses<br />
Duplicate lethals were proposed as a major cause of F 1 pollen<br />
sterility <strong>in</strong> varietal crosses of rice (Oka 1974). The genic model<br />
assumes that the genotypes of parents are +1+1s2s2 and<br />
s1s1+2+2 and that the hybrid produces aborted microspores,<br />
which carry lethals of both s1 and s2. Different sets of duplicate<br />
lethals seemed to cause different degrees of hybrid<br />
semisterility and the assumption was partly supported by the<br />
results mak<strong>in</strong>g NILs with different sets of duplicate lethals from<br />
different cultivars. The three NILs (P98, P99, and P101) established<br />
by Oka (1974) were used <strong>in</strong> this study and <strong>in</strong>ter-<br />
References<br />
Oka HI. 1974. Analysis of genes controll<strong>in</strong>g F 1 sterility <strong>in</strong> rice by<br />
use of isogenic l<strong>in</strong>es. <strong>Genetics</strong> 77:521-534.<br />
Oka HI. 1988. Functions and genetic bases of reproductive barriers.<br />
In: Oka HI, editor. Orig<strong>in</strong> of cultivated rice. Tokyo (Japan):<br />
Elsevier. p 181-209.<br />
Sano Y. 1990. Genic nature of gamete elim<strong>in</strong>ator <strong>in</strong> rice. <strong>Genetics</strong><br />
125:183-191.<br />
Sano Y. 1992. Genetic comparisons of chromosome 6 between wild<br />
and cultivated rice. Jpn. J. Breed. 42:561-572.<br />
Sano Y. 1993. Constra<strong>in</strong>ts <strong>in</strong> us<strong>in</strong>g wild relatives <strong>in</strong> breed<strong>in</strong>g: lack<strong>in</strong>g<br />
of basic knowledge on crop gene pools. In: Buxton DR,<br />
editor. <strong>International</strong> Crop Science I. Madison, Wis. (USA):<br />
Crop Science Society of America. p 437-443.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ address: Faculty of Agriculture, Hokkaido University,<br />
Sapporo 060-8589, Japan.<br />
Developmental cytology on gametic abortion caused by<br />
<strong>in</strong>duced complementary genes gal and d60 <strong>in</strong> japonica rice<br />
M. Tomita, H. Yamagata, and T. Tanisaka<br />
Genes for hybrid sterility have been found <strong>in</strong> crosses between distantly related rice species show<strong>in</strong>g a reproductive barrier. The<br />
gametic lethal gene gal causes gametic abortion together with the semidwarf<strong>in</strong>g gene d60 <strong>in</strong> crosses among closely related<br />
japonica varieties. The F 1<br />
between mutant l<strong>in</strong>e Hokuriku 100 (genotype d60d60GalGal, Gal: nonlethal allele) and its orig<strong>in</strong>al<br />
variety Koshihikari (D60D60galgal, D60: tall allele) showed 25% sterility because of the deterioration of both sex gametes<br />
hav<strong>in</strong>g the genotype d60gal. Development processes of male gametes were cytologically observed us<strong>in</strong>g the F 4<br />
progenies.<br />
Meioses, tetrads, stranded microspores, s<strong>in</strong>gle-nucleate pollens, and first-pollen mitoses were normally observed <strong>in</strong> all plants.<br />
However, at the middle b<strong>in</strong>ucleate stage, when generative nuclei became enclosed <strong>in</strong> newly formed generative cells and were<br />
located opposite the pore side (apart from vegetative nuclei), some pollens discont<strong>in</strong>ued development <strong>in</strong> the F 4<br />
plants with<br />
71.6% seed set. Before anthesis, two dist<strong>in</strong>ct types of pollen were observed: vacant pollens (median value 37 microns) with<br />
only a remnant of the generative cell wall and normal tr<strong>in</strong>ucleate pollens (51 microns) with well-developed cytoplasm. The<br />
frequency of the empty pollens averaged 24.5%, which was expected for the haploid genotype d60gal.<br />
178 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
Genes for hybrid sterility of rice have been found mostly <strong>in</strong><br />
crosses between distantly related species, which belong to different<br />
gene pools show<strong>in</strong>g a reproductive barrier. This was the<br />
first discovery of a hybrid sterility gene among japonica varieties<br />
free from a reproductive barrier. The gametic lethal gene<br />
gal was identified, together with its activator d60 (semidwarf<strong>in</strong>g<br />
gene), <strong>in</strong> a cross between semidwarf mutant Hokuriku 100 and<br />
its orig<strong>in</strong>al tall variety Koshihikari (Tomita et al 1989). Because<br />
of the deterioration of the gametes hav<strong>in</strong>g both gal and<br />
d60, the F 1 between Hokuriku 100 (genotype d60d60GalGal,<br />
Gal: mutant allele) and Koshihikari (D60D60galgal, D60: tall<br />
allele) showed 25% sterility and the F 2 progenies then segregated<br />
<strong>in</strong>to a ratio of 1 semidwarf (1 d60d60GalGal):2 tall and<br />
25% sterile (2 D60d60Galgal):6 tall (2 D60d60GalGal:1<br />
D60D60GalGal:2 D60D60Galgal:1 D60D60galgal) (Tomita<br />
1996), which was skewed from a ratio of 1 semidwarf:3 tall<br />
based on a s<strong>in</strong>gle recessive gene segregation.<br />
Several genetic systems have been reported for hybrid<br />
sterility between <strong>in</strong>dica and japonica varietal groups, pollen<br />
sterility by duplicate recessive gametophytic alleles (Oka 1953,<br />
1974), female sterility caused by one-locus sporo-gametophytic<br />
<strong>in</strong>teractions (Kitamura 1962, Oka 1964, Ikehashi and Wan<br />
1996, Wan and Ikehashi 1996), and both-sex breakdown accord<strong>in</strong>g<br />
to the one-locus gene model (Sano et al 1994). Onelocus<br />
allelic <strong>in</strong>teractions for male sterility were also found <strong>in</strong><br />
the species of hybrids between Oryza sativa and O. glaberrima<br />
(Sano et al 1979), O. sativa and O. rufipogon (Sano 1992),<br />
and O. sativa and O. glumaepatula. However, little <strong>in</strong>formation<br />
on gametic developmental processes is available.<br />
The semidwarf<strong>in</strong>g gene d60 confers a good erect stature,<br />
about 15 cm shorter than that of the orig<strong>in</strong>al variety; d60<br />
has potential to be a promis<strong>in</strong>g alternative to the preferentially<br />
used gene sd1. For the practical use of d60 <strong>in</strong> semidwarf<strong>in</strong>g<br />
breed<strong>in</strong>g programs, the pleiotropic effect <strong>in</strong> the gametic developmental<br />
process must be overcome. The objective of this<br />
paper is to demonstrate the male breakdown caused by gal<br />
and d60.<br />
Materials and methods<br />
Developmental processes of male gametes were exam<strong>in</strong>ed by<br />
us<strong>in</strong>g 30 F 4 plants derived from the 25% sterile F 3 plants (genotype<br />
D60d60Galgal), follow<strong>in</strong>g the cross between Koshihikari<br />
and Hokuriku 100. Both parents were also used. Hokuriku 100<br />
is one of the most promis<strong>in</strong>g semidwarf mutants selected from<br />
gamma-irradiated Koshihikari to enhance lodg<strong>in</strong>g resistance<br />
of the lead<strong>in</strong>g Japanese variety Koshihikari. The growth stages<br />
of male gametes were estimated from the auricle length between<br />
the flag leaf and the next leaf. Ten panicles were sampled<br />
from each plant several times before the meiotic stage to the<br />
tr<strong>in</strong>ucleate pollen stage. Sampled panicles were fixed <strong>in</strong> formal<strong>in</strong>-acetic<br />
alcohol (FAA) for 48 h and subsequently stored<br />
<strong>in</strong> 70% ethanol. Specimens of microspores were prepared by<br />
the acetocarm<strong>in</strong>e squash method and then observed under a<br />
compound microscope. The diameters of 250 pollens per glume<br />
were measured at the tr<strong>in</strong>ucleate stage with an eyepiece micrometer<br />
at 1,000X magnification. Percentage spikelet fertility<br />
was calculated on the basis of the number of filled and<br />
unfilled spikelets for each harvested panicle.<br />
Results<br />
The F 1 plants of Koshihikari (tall)/Hokuriku 100 (semidwarf)<br />
grew <strong>in</strong>to tall phenotypes like Koshihikari and averaged 28.4%<br />
unfilled spikelets. F 2 progenies segregated <strong>in</strong>to the ratio of 11<br />
semidwarf plants (Hokuriku 100 type):24 25% sterile tall plants<br />
(F 1 type):65 fertile tall plants (Koshihikari type) and the genotypic<br />
classification of 11 semidwarf:24 tall and 25% sterile:19<br />
tall heterozygous:46 tall homozygous determ<strong>in</strong>ed by the F 3<br />
test showed a good fit to the theoretical ratio of 1<br />
d60d60GalGal:2 D60d60Galgal:2 D60d60GalGal:4 (1<br />
D60D60GalGal:2 D60D60Galgal:1 D60D60galgal) (χ 2 = 0.49,<br />
0.75
A B C D<br />
E F G H<br />
Fig. 1. Developmental process of male gametes <strong>in</strong> 25% sterile plants (genotype D60d60Galgal). (A) meiosis, (B) tetrads, (C) first mitotic<br />
division, (D) early s<strong>in</strong>gle-nucleate pollen, (E) late s<strong>in</strong>gle-nucleate pollen, (F) metaphase of first-pollen mitosis, (G) anaphase of first-pollen<br />
mitosis, (H) early b<strong>in</strong>ucleate pollen, (I) middle b<strong>in</strong>ucleate pollen, (J) abortive b<strong>in</strong>ucleate pollen (genotype d60gal), (K) degraded pollen<br />
before flower<strong>in</strong>g (genotype d60gal), (L) late b<strong>in</strong>ucleate pollen, (M) tr<strong>in</strong>ucleate pollen, (N) mature pollen before flower<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
types were D60d60Galgal, follow<strong>in</strong>g the cross between<br />
Koshihikari and Hokuriku 100.<br />
Discussion<br />
Two types of genetic systems were found to be responsible for<br />
semisterility <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>tersubspecific hybrids between <strong>in</strong>dica and<br />
japonica varietal groups: the duplicate gametophytic lethal<br />
system by the recessive s alleles on the two S loci (Oka 1953,<br />
1974) and the one-locus sporo-gametophytic allelic <strong>in</strong>teraction<br />
by the s<strong>in</strong>gle S locus (Kitamura 1962, Oka 1964, Ikehashi<br />
and Wan 1996, Wan and Ikehashi 1996, Sano et al 1994). Oka<br />
(1953) proposed that duplicate S gene loci, which work as<br />
developmental factors <strong>in</strong> gametes, caused hybrid sterility when<br />
the F 1 gametes received both the recessive s genes on each<br />
duplicate locus. Hybrid sterility caused by gal and d60 and by<br />
the duplicate s genes has similar effects and these gametophytic<br />
genes are responsible for both systems. However, a critical<br />
difference is found between the systems—gal and d60 caused<br />
both-sex sterilities, whereas the duplicate s genes caused only<br />
male sterility (Oka 1974). Moreover, both-sex breakdowns by<br />
gal and d60 were quite rare cases except for S10, which caused<br />
a one-locus allelic <strong>in</strong>teraction (Sano et al 1994). Furthermore,<br />
Oka (1953) observed that pollens deteriorated randomly from<br />
the s<strong>in</strong>gle-nucleate stage to the b<strong>in</strong>ucleate stage because of the<br />
presence of duplicate s genes. In our study, it was observed<br />
that gal and d60 caused simultaneous pollen abortion at the<br />
middle b<strong>in</strong>ucleate stage. Moreover, Tomita (1996) reported<br />
that the 25% sterility caused by gal and d60 occurred <strong>in</strong> addition<br />
to the <strong>in</strong>tersubspecific <strong>in</strong>fertility <strong>in</strong> the F 1 between Milyang<br />
23 and Hokuriku 100. From the four differences found <strong>in</strong> gene<br />
effects, gal and d60 are clearly dist<strong>in</strong>guished from the duplicate<br />
s genes and the s<strong>in</strong>gle S locus.<br />
If the nonlethal gene Gal had not mutated from gal together<br />
with the <strong>in</strong>duction of d60, d60 should be elim<strong>in</strong>ated <strong>in</strong><br />
an M 1 plant. The gal, which <strong>in</strong>teracts with d60, has never been<br />
found as a gametic lethal gene. Thus, Gal, be<strong>in</strong>g essential to<br />
the transmission of d60, is a valuable gene, which can br<strong>in</strong>g<br />
about new semidwarf breed<strong>in</strong>g through the use of d60.<br />
References<br />
Ikehashi H, Wan J. 1996. Differentiation of alleles at seven loci for<br />
hybrid sterility <strong>in</strong> cultivated rice (Oryza sativa L.). In: Khush<br />
GS, editor. <strong>Rice</strong> genetics III. Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs of the Third <strong>International</strong><br />
<strong>Rice</strong> <strong>Genetics</strong> Symposium, 16-20 Oct 1995. Manila<br />
(Philipp<strong>in</strong>es): <strong>International</strong> <strong>Rice</strong> Research Institute. p 404-<br />
408.<br />
Kitamura E. 1962. Genetic studies on sterility observed <strong>in</strong> hybrids<br />
between distantly related varieties of rice, Oryza sativa L. Bull.<br />
Chugoku Agric. Exp. Stn. S. A8:141-205.<br />
180 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
J<br />
K<br />
I<br />
L M N<br />
Fig. 1 cont<strong>in</strong>ued.<br />
Oka HI. 1953. The mechanism of sterility <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>tervarietal hybrid.<br />
(Phylogenetic differentiation of the cultivated rice. VI.) Jpn.<br />
J. Breed. 2:217-224. (Japanese/English.)<br />
Oka HI. 1964. Considerations on the genetic basis of <strong>in</strong>tervarietal<br />
sterility <strong>in</strong> Oryza sativa. In: <strong>Rice</strong> genetics and cytogenetics.<br />
Amsterdam (Netherlands): Elsevier and <strong>International</strong> <strong>Rice</strong><br />
Research Institute. p 158-174.<br />
Oka HI. 1974. Analysis of genes controll<strong>in</strong>g F 1 sterility <strong>in</strong> rice by<br />
the use of isogenic l<strong>in</strong>es. <strong>Genetics</strong> 77:521-534.<br />
Sano Y. 1992. Genetic comparisons of chromosome 6 between wild<br />
and cultivated rice. Jpn. J. Breed. 42:561-572.<br />
Sano Y, Sano R, Eiguchi M, Hirano HY. 1994. Gamete elim<strong>in</strong>ator<br />
adjacent to the wx locus as revealed by pollen analysis <strong>in</strong> rice.<br />
J. Hered. 85:310-312.<br />
Sano Y, Chu YE, Oka HI. 1979. Genetic studies of speciation <strong>in</strong><br />
cultivated rice. 1. Genic analysis for the F 1 sterility between<br />
O. sativa L. and O. glaberrima Steud. Jpn. J. Genet. 54:121-<br />
132.<br />
Tomita M. 1996. The gametic lethal gene gal: activated only <strong>in</strong> the<br />
presence of the semidwarf<strong>in</strong>g gene d60 <strong>in</strong> rice. In: Khush GS,<br />
editor. <strong>Rice</strong> genetics III. Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs of the Third <strong>International</strong><br />
<strong>Rice</strong> <strong>Genetics</strong> Symposium, 16-20 Oct 1995. Manila<br />
(Philipp<strong>in</strong>es): <strong>International</strong> <strong>Rice</strong> Research Institute. p 396-<br />
403.<br />
Tomita M, Tanisaka T, Okumoto Y, Yamagata H. 1989. L<strong>in</strong>kage analysis<br />
for the gametic lethal gene of rice variety Koshihikari and<br />
the semidwarf gene <strong>in</strong>duced <strong>in</strong> Koshihikari. In: Iyama S,<br />
Takeda G, editors. The key to the survival of the Earth. Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs<br />
of the 6th <strong>International</strong> Congress of the Society for<br />
the Advancement of Breed<strong>in</strong>g Researches <strong>in</strong> Asia and Oceania,<br />
21-25 Aug 1989, Tsukuba, Japan. p 345-348.<br />
Wan J, Ikehashi H. 1996. List of hybrid sterility gene loci (HSGLi)<br />
<strong>in</strong> cultivated rice (Oryza sativa L.). <strong>Rice</strong> Genet. Newsl. 13:110-<br />
114.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ addresses: M. Tomita, Faculty of Agriculture, Tottori University,<br />
Koyama-cho, Tottori 680-8553, Japan; H. Yamagata,<br />
Faculty of Biology-Oriented Science and Technology, K<strong>in</strong>ki<br />
University, Uchita, Wakayama 649-6493, Japan; T. Tanisaka,<br />
Graduate School of Agriculture, Kyoto University, Sakyo-ku,<br />
Kyoto 606-8502, Japan. Email: tomita@muses.tottori-u.ac.jp.<br />
Genetic diversity, evolution, and alien <strong>in</strong>trogression 181
Molecular diversity and its geographical distribution<br />
<strong>in</strong> core rice germplasm<br />
W.J. Xu, S.B. Yu, S. S<strong>in</strong>gh, J. Dom<strong>in</strong>go, H. Bhandari, Y.F. Lu, C.H.M. Vijayakumar, P. Bagali, S. Sarkarung, S.S. Virmani, G.S. Khush, and Z.K. Li<br />
In an effort to develop an <strong>in</strong>ternational rice molecular breed<strong>in</strong>g program, a large set of 193 rice genotypes from 19 different<br />
countries/regions was collected to form a core rice gene pool. To evaluate the genetic diversity of the gene pool and provide<br />
DNA polymorphism <strong>in</strong>formation for future gene/QTL mapp<strong>in</strong>g and marker-assisted breed<strong>in</strong>g, a well-distributed anchor set of<br />
101 simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers was used to genotype these l<strong>in</strong>es. Considerable variation was found <strong>in</strong> all SSR<br />
marker loci, with an overall genetic diversity of 0.687 and an average of 6.2 alleles per SSR locus. SSR loci with prevalent<br />
alleles were scattered across the rice genome, except chromosomes 5 and 6. Cluster analysis of the 193 accessions based on<br />
the SSR data revealed four cultivar groups. Group I corresponded to the classical <strong>in</strong>dica group, while group IV corresponded to<br />
the classical japonica group. Groups II and III represented a portion of the sample that consisted of some modern cultivars,<br />
diverse landraces, and traditional japonica varieties. Cultivars <strong>in</strong> group I (<strong>in</strong>dica) showed the highest level of diversity at all<br />
levels. In particular, <strong>in</strong>dica l<strong>in</strong>es from Ch<strong>in</strong>a and India were apparently differentiated from each other, form<strong>in</strong>g two separate<br />
subgroups.<br />
<strong>Rice</strong> is the staple food of more than three billion people <strong>in</strong><br />
Asia. Successes <strong>in</strong> rice genetic improvement are largely attributed<br />
to the appropriate evaluation and use of genetic diversity.<br />
In an effort to develop an <strong>in</strong>ternational rice molecular<br />
breed<strong>in</strong>g program, a large set of 193 rice genotypes from 19<br />
different countries or regions was collected as a core gene pool.<br />
In our study, we try to quantify the genetic diversity of these<br />
collections with<strong>in</strong> and among cultivar groups as well as geographical<br />
orig<strong>in</strong>s us<strong>in</strong>g mapped simple sequence repeat (SSR)<br />
markers and to evaluate their relative contributions to total<br />
gene diversity <strong>in</strong> the core gene pool. Information from this<br />
study could be valuable for design<strong>in</strong>g optimal procedures <strong>in</strong><br />
future molecular breed<strong>in</strong>g practices.<br />
Materials and methods<br />
A total of 193 accessions were obta<strong>in</strong>ed from 19 countries or<br />
regions. These accessions were chosen to represent the ma<strong>in</strong><br />
genetic diversity with<strong>in</strong> and among geographical orig<strong>in</strong>s. DNA<br />
extraction was done after 3 wk, follow<strong>in</strong>g a modified CTAB<br />
procedure. Polymerase cha<strong>in</strong> reactions (PCR) and silver sta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />
procedures were as described <strong>in</strong> the technical manual of<br />
Promega (1996). A total of 101 anchor SSR primer pairs developed<br />
by Cornell University (Temnykh et al 2000) were used<br />
<strong>in</strong> the assay. The result<strong>in</strong>g electrophoregrams were analyzed<br />
with the software Quantity One from Bio-rad. The methods<br />
for discrim<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g phenotypes of <strong>in</strong>dica and japonica <strong>in</strong>cluded<br />
(1) phenol reaction, (2) degree of gra<strong>in</strong> shedd<strong>in</strong>g, (3) ratio of<br />
gra<strong>in</strong> length to width, and (4) glume hair<strong>in</strong>ess.<br />
Each of the <strong>in</strong>formative bands was scored <strong>in</strong>dependently:<br />
1 for present and 0 for absent. A two-way data matrix was<br />
constructed, consist<strong>in</strong>g of the marker loci/alleles present <strong>in</strong> each<br />
variety. The raw data were submitted to NTSYS-PC to transform<br />
polymorphic bands <strong>in</strong>to Dice distance. Cluster analyses<br />
were performed based on the unweighted pair group method<br />
us<strong>in</strong>g arithmetic averages (UPGMA) to reveal similarities<br />
among these 193 genotypes. Analyses of molecular variance<br />
(AMOVA) and allele frequencies were obta<strong>in</strong>ed us<strong>in</strong>g the software<br />
package ARLEQUIN (Schneider et al 1996). Average<br />
gene diversity over loci was calculated. Two-level hierarchical<br />
gene diversity analyses were performed follow<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
method of F<strong>in</strong>keldey and Murillo (1999) to partition total gene<br />
diversity <strong>in</strong>to with<strong>in</strong>- and among-cultivar groups.<br />
Results<br />
Polymorphism<br />
All 101 microsatellite loci were polymorphic over 193 core<br />
genotypes. The total number of putative alleles was observed<br />
to be 632, averaged as 6.3 alleles per locus. About 5% of the<br />
alleles appeared <strong>in</strong> more than 50% of the cultivars (referred to<br />
as prevalent alleles), <strong>in</strong> contrast to 48% of the alleles present<br />
<strong>in</strong> fewer than 10% of the cultivars. The 34 microsatellite loci<br />
with prevalent alleles were scattered over most of the rice genome,<br />
except chromosomes 5 and 6. These two chromosomes<br />
contributed the most to total genetic diversity (0.687) <strong>in</strong> the<br />
core collection.<br />
Cluster analysis<br />
The UPGMA cluster dendrogram showed four major groups<br />
and two groups with s<strong>in</strong>gle varieties (Fig. 1). AMOVA showed<br />
that among-group variation accounted for 8.56% of total molecular<br />
variation, while with<strong>in</strong> subgroups and among subgroups,<br />
variation was 15.26% and 76.17%, respectively. Group I contributed<br />
the most to gene diversity among and with<strong>in</strong> varietal<br />
groups as well as to total gene diversity (Fig. 2). Groups II,<br />
III, and IV exhibited greater contributions to genetic differentiation<br />
among groups than with<strong>in</strong> groups and to total gene diversity.<br />
Group I was recognized as the classical <strong>in</strong>dica group,<br />
consist<strong>in</strong>g of four subgroups. The s<strong>in</strong>gle group 1 consisted of<br />
only variety Babaomi, which is from a high-elevation area of<br />
182 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
Sub-G1 (52, 100%)<br />
%<br />
80<br />
Sub-G2 (5, 100%)<br />
Sub-G3 (31, 77.4%)<br />
Group I<br />
70<br />
60<br />
Ct(j)<br />
Cs(j)<br />
Cst(j)<br />
Sub-G4 (44, 69.8%)<br />
50<br />
40<br />
S<strong>in</strong>gle group 1<br />
Sub-G5 (14, 35.7%)<br />
Sub-G6 (11, 0%)<br />
Group II<br />
30<br />
Sub-G7 (25, 3.8%)<br />
Group III<br />
20<br />
0.24 0.30<br />
Sub-G8 (9, 0%)<br />
S<strong>in</strong>gle group 2<br />
Group IV<br />
Fig. 1. Association among eight subgroups revealed by<br />
UPGMA cluster of Dice similarity coefficients calculated<br />
from 101 SSR marker loci. Total number of l<strong>in</strong>es and percentage<br />
of <strong>in</strong>dica l<strong>in</strong>es are <strong>in</strong>dicated <strong>in</strong> parentheses.<br />
10<br />
0<br />
Group I Group II Group III Group IV<br />
Fig. 2. Contributions of <strong>in</strong>dividual groups to gene diversity<br />
among groups (Cst(j)), populations with<strong>in</strong> groups (CS(j)), and<br />
total gene diversity (Ct(j)).<br />
Table 1. Geographical distribution of four major groups of 191 core collections <strong>in</strong> eight subgroups<br />
(SG).<br />
Geographical Group I Group II Group III Group IV<br />
orig<strong>in</strong><br />
SG1 SG2 SG3 SG4 SG5 SG6 SG7 SG8<br />
Total<br />
Africa 1 1 2 4<br />
America 1 3 1 5<br />
Bangladesh 2 1 3<br />
Ch<strong>in</strong>a 16 5 1 8 5 2 2 5 44<br />
Europe 5 5<br />
India 9 5 15 4 3 1 37<br />
Indonesia 2 1 1 1 1 6<br />
Iran 2 3 1 6<br />
<strong>IRRI</strong> 6 2 6 14<br />
Japan 2 1 3<br />
Korea 2 1 2 5<br />
Malaysia 2 4 1 1 8<br />
Myanmar 3 3 1 1 8<br />
Nepal 1 3 3 3 10<br />
Pakistan 1 2 3<br />
Philipp<strong>in</strong>es 2 1 1 3 7<br />
Sri Lanka 3 1 1 5<br />
Thailand 2 2 4<br />
Vietnam 2 10 1 1 14<br />
Total 52 5 31 44 14 11 25 9 191<br />
Yunnan Prov<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>in</strong> Southwestern Ch<strong>in</strong>a. Group II consisted<br />
of two subgroups: sub-G5 and sub-G6. Most of the cultivars<br />
<strong>in</strong> sub-G5 were landraces and traditional types, while those <strong>in</strong><br />
sub-G6 were improved japonica cultivars with particular characteristics<br />
such as tolerance for biotic or abiotic stress or spe-<br />
cial gra<strong>in</strong> qualities. Varietal group III consisted of a wide range<br />
of japonica cultivars. Group IV consisted of n<strong>in</strong>e japonica<br />
cultivars. S<strong>in</strong>gle group 2 has only one deepwater variety,<br />
Jalmagna from India. The geographical orig<strong>in</strong>s of cultivars <strong>in</strong><br />
each group are shown <strong>in</strong> Table 1. Notably, most of the <strong>in</strong>dica<br />
Genetic diversity, evolution, and alien <strong>in</strong>trogression 183
cultivars from Ch<strong>in</strong>a belonged to sub-G1 and sub-G2, while<br />
those from India were under sub-G4.<br />
Discussion<br />
This study has shown that less than 5% of a total of 632 alleles<br />
are prevalent alleles, which are present <strong>in</strong> more than 50% of<br />
the cultivars <strong>in</strong> the core collections. This is consistent with our<br />
knowledge that more than 95% of the rice collections <strong>in</strong> the<br />
primary gene pool have seldom been used <strong>in</strong> modern plant<br />
breed<strong>in</strong>g programs. The occurrence of prevalent alleles is probably<br />
caused by massive selection on a limited number of cultivars,<br />
which is revealed by an analysis of the ancestry of improved<br />
cultivars of Asian rice. The f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs suggest that all<br />
cultivars released by late 1979 under the IR designation can<br />
be traced to the same maternal parent C<strong>in</strong>a (Hargrove et al<br />
1980), and that all cultivars developed <strong>in</strong> the Philipp<strong>in</strong>es from<br />
1960 to 1994 showed the genetic core of 19 ancestral parents.<br />
None of the SSR markers with prevalent alleles were located<br />
on chromosomes 5 and 6, provid<strong>in</strong>g evidence that a traditional<br />
breed<strong>in</strong>g strategy based on multiple cross<strong>in</strong>g and phenotypic<br />
selection has limited power to overcome sterility problems and<br />
<strong>in</strong>dica-japonica genomic differentiation. A majority of the<br />
genes for <strong>in</strong>dica-japonica hybrid sterility and <strong>in</strong>dica-japonica<br />
differentiation are located on chromosomes 5 and 6 (Zhang et<br />
al 1997, K<strong>in</strong>oshita 1993). The emphasis on the use of japonica<strong>in</strong>dica<br />
variation for future molecular breed<strong>in</strong>g would be of great<br />
help for <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g the genetic diversity of rice cultivars,<br />
thereby break<strong>in</strong>g the yield ceil<strong>in</strong>g and improv<strong>in</strong>g production<br />
susta<strong>in</strong>ability.<br />
The results of this study clearly suggest the possible existence<br />
of temperate and tropical <strong>in</strong>dica differentiation, although<br />
this may not be as <strong>in</strong>tensive as that of temperate and<br />
tropical japonica. The classical evidence for the two ecotypes<br />
of <strong>in</strong>dica cultivars came from general differentiations <strong>in</strong> some<br />
morphological traits, such as gra<strong>in</strong> shape and defense pattern<br />
aga<strong>in</strong>st <strong>in</strong>sect or disease <strong>in</strong>festation as well as heterotic pattern<br />
with<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>dica cultivars. It has been reported that the <strong>in</strong>itial<br />
high-yield<strong>in</strong>g hybrid rice cultivars developed <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a largely<br />
resulted from the high genetic diversity between Ch<strong>in</strong>ese <strong>in</strong>dica<br />
ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>er l<strong>in</strong>es and the tropical restorer l<strong>in</strong>e developed<br />
at <strong>IRRI</strong>, which were later recognized as two heterotic groups<br />
with<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>dica (Zhang et al 1995).<br />
References<br />
F<strong>in</strong>keldey R, Murillo O. 1999. Contribution of subpopulations to<br />
total gene diversity. Theor. Appl. Genet. 98:664-668.<br />
Hargrove TR, Coffman WR, Cabanilla VL. 1980. Ancestry of cultivars<br />
of Asian rice. Crop Sci. 20:721-727.<br />
K<strong>in</strong>oshita T. 1993. Report of the Committee on Gene Symbolization,<br />
Nomenclature and L<strong>in</strong>kage Groups. <strong>Rice</strong> Genet. Newsl.<br />
10:7-39.<br />
Schneider S, Kneffer JM, Roessle D, Excoffier L. 1996. ARLEQUIN.<br />
Switzerland: <strong>Genetics</strong> and Biometry Laboratory, Department<br />
of Anthropology, University of Geneva.<br />
Temnykh S, Park WD, Ayres N, Cart<strong>in</strong>hour S, Hauck N, Lipovich L,<br />
Cho YG, Ishii T, McCouch SR. 2000. Mapp<strong>in</strong>g and genome<br />
organization of microsatellite sequences <strong>in</strong> rice (Oryza sativa<br />
L.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 100:697-712.<br />
Zhang QF, Gao YJ, Saghai Maroof MA, Yang SH, Li JX. 1995.<br />
Molecular divergence and hybrid performance <strong>in</strong> rice. Mol.<br />
Breed. 1:133-142.<br />
Zhang QF, Liu KD, Yang GP, Saghai Maroof MA, Xu CG, Zhou<br />
ZQ. 1997. Molecular marker diversity and hybrid sterility <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>in</strong>dica-japonica rice crosses. Theor. Appl. Genet. 95:112-118.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ address: Plant Breed<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>Genetics</strong>, and Biochemistry Division,<br />
<strong>International</strong> <strong>Rice</strong> Research Institute (<strong>IRRI</strong>), DAPO<br />
Box 7777, Metro Manila, Philipp<strong>in</strong>es.<br />
Phenotypic diversity <strong>in</strong> embryo mutants <strong>in</strong>duced by tissue<br />
culture <strong>in</strong> rice<br />
T. Iwamoto, S.K. Hong, H. Imai, M. Matsuoka, and H. Kitano<br />
We identified 146 rice embryo mutants from 6,000 M 2<br />
l<strong>in</strong>es that had been regenerated from 3-mo-old Nipponbare calli.<br />
Among them, 52 mutants were characterized <strong>in</strong>to three groups based on their phenotypes: deletion of embryonic organ(s),<br />
abnormal embryo size, and aberration <strong>in</strong> organ morphology. Mutants with deletion of embryonic organ(s) are composed of<br />
small globular embryos, club-shaped embryos, large undifferentiated embryos, and shootless and radicleless embryos. Changes<br />
<strong>in</strong> embryo-size mutants seemed to be <strong>in</strong> the size of their scutellum. Such variation <strong>in</strong> mutants detected <strong>in</strong> embryogenesis<br />
suggested that many genes could be related <strong>in</strong> regulat<strong>in</strong>g embryogenesis. The copy number of retrotransposon Tos17 <strong>in</strong>creased<br />
<strong>in</strong> several mutants. Some mutations may be affected by Tos17 because it can transpose throughout the chromosome<br />
dur<strong>in</strong>g tissue culture. Thus, we consider tissue culture useful for study<strong>in</strong>g genetic regulation of organ differentiation and for<br />
isolat<strong>in</strong>g genes expressed dur<strong>in</strong>g embryogenesis.<br />
184 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
Embryogenesis has been <strong>in</strong>vestigated by creat<strong>in</strong>g mutations <strong>in</strong><br />
rice, maize, and Arabidopsis. These studies <strong>in</strong>dicate that complicated<br />
regulatory systems are operat<strong>in</strong>g dur<strong>in</strong>g embryogenesis,<br />
<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g pattern formation, organ differentiation, axial<br />
determ<strong>in</strong>ation, size regulation, and morphogenesis. Despite the<br />
grow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>terest <strong>in</strong> this area, little is known about their regulatory<br />
mechanism.<br />
Tissue culture-<strong>in</strong>duced mutations have been reported <strong>in</strong><br />
many plant species and studied extensively. Hirochika et al<br />
(1996) reported that retrotransposons are <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> tissue<br />
culture mutations <strong>in</strong> rice. Among several retrotransposon families<br />
of rice, the most active one, Tos17, is a useful tool for<br />
<strong>in</strong>sertional mutagenesis and gene tagg<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
Materials and methods<br />
Callus cultures were <strong>in</strong>duced through seed culture of japonica<br />
rice variety Nipponbare on Murashige and Skoog medium conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />
2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid at 2 mg L –1 . After 1-<br />
mo <strong>in</strong>cubation, calli were transferred onto N6 medium to <strong>in</strong>duce<br />
suspension-cultured cells. A total of about 8,000 M 1 l<strong>in</strong>es<br />
were regenerated from 3-mo-old calli. About 6,000 M 2 l<strong>in</strong>es<br />
were screened for embryo mutants. Mature dry seeds were allowed<br />
to imbibe <strong>in</strong> water for 24 h, after which the abnormalities<br />
of mature embryos were analyzed under the dissect<strong>in</strong>g<br />
microscope.<br />
Mutant phenotypes were observed us<strong>in</strong>g standard paraff<strong>in</strong><br />
sections. Mature dry seeds were imbibed <strong>in</strong> water for 24 h<br />
prior to fixation <strong>in</strong> formal<strong>in</strong>-acetic acid-70% ethanol (1:1:18)<br />
solution. Removed embryos were dehydrated <strong>in</strong> a graded ethanol<br />
series, embedded <strong>in</strong> paraff<strong>in</strong>, and then cut <strong>in</strong>to 10-µm sections.<br />
Sections were sta<strong>in</strong>ed with Delafield’s hematoxyl<strong>in</strong>. Phenotypes<br />
of mutants were observed under the microscope.<br />
Results<br />
Characterization and categorization of mutants<br />
Fifty-two embryo mutants were identified. The frequency of<br />
mutant embryos <strong>in</strong> heterozygous plants was about 25% <strong>in</strong> most<br />
mutants (data not shown). Although the embryonic mutants<br />
had well-developed endosperms, many k<strong>in</strong>ds of abnormalities<br />
<strong>in</strong> each embryo were observed. These embryo mutants were<br />
categorized <strong>in</strong>to three groups: deletion of embryonic organ(s),<br />
abnormal embryo size, and aberration <strong>in</strong> organ morphology<br />
(Table 1).<br />
N<strong>in</strong>eteen mutants were categorized as hav<strong>in</strong>g deleted<br />
organ(s) and two subgroups, one show<strong>in</strong>g no embryonic organs<br />
and the other lack<strong>in</strong>g either shoot or radicle, were found.<br />
Thirteen mutants failed to develop any embryonic organ (Table<br />
1). Among them, seven mutants had relatively small and globular<br />
(200 to 700 µm) or club-shaped (600 to 900 µm) embryos.<br />
Six mutant embryos were relatively large (750 to 1,700 µm)<br />
but had no embryonic organ. The second subgroup was represented<br />
as shootless or radicleless embryos.<br />
Embryo-size mutants showed reduced and enlarged sizes<br />
without serious effects on the differentiation of either the shoot<br />
Table 1. Categorization of embryo mutants <strong>in</strong> rice.<br />
Phenotype/characteristics<br />
Stra<strong>in</strong><br />
Deletion of organ(s)<br />
Organless, globular 1342, 2504, 3613, 4753<br />
Organless, club-shaped 551, 2832, 5049<br />
Large but organless 615, 1837, 3219, 3761, 3801, 4107<br />
Shootless, normal radicle 904, 1041, 2995, 3491<br />
Radicleless, normal shoot 521, 1661<br />
Modified embryo size<br />
Reduced embryo and organs 1154, 1184, 5799<br />
Large scutellum 3716, 4479, 4779<br />
Large scutellum, multiple 2206<br />
organs<br />
Morphological aberration<br />
Shoot organization 378, 462, 940<br />
Green embryo, abnormal<br />
organ morphology 1145, 1469<br />
Green embryo, viviparous 1881<br />
Multiple organs 1336<br />
Undeveloped organs 2320, 3477<br />
Abnormal organ morphology 173, 1447, 3275, 3474, 3836, 4114,<br />
4546, 4738, 4770, 4821, 5324,<br />
5340, 5576, 5587, 5677, 5764,<br />
5998<br />
or radicle. Both types of mutations were obta<strong>in</strong>ed with four<br />
reduced embryos and three giant embryos. In these mutants,<br />
reduction or enlargement was exclusively due to scutellum<br />
development. In some mutants, both shoot and radicle primordia<br />
were formed. However, the morphology or the extent of<br />
differentiation was abnormal. A very wide phenotypic variation<br />
was observed among the 26 mutants belong<strong>in</strong>g to this<br />
group.<br />
Copy number of Tos17<br />
The copy number of retrotransposon Tos17 was exam<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong><br />
some of the mutants. An <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> copy number of Tos17<br />
was observed <strong>in</strong> some mutants based on the orig<strong>in</strong>al copy number<br />
of two <strong>in</strong> Nipponbare. One to four transposed Tos17 were<br />
detected <strong>in</strong> different stra<strong>in</strong>s (904, 1145, 1154, 1184, 1469, 2504,<br />
and 2832). Different hybridization patterns expected as a result<br />
of random transposition were observed. In other mutants,<br />
no change <strong>in</strong> the copy number of Tos17 was observed.<br />
Discussion<br />
Phenotypic diversity of rice embryonic mutations was reported<br />
and many embryonic mutants treated by chemical mutagen have<br />
been characterized to date (Hong et al 1995). In this study, we<br />
<strong>in</strong>duced mutations us<strong>in</strong>g tissue culture. Many mutations isolated<br />
here were largely similar to those <strong>in</strong>duced by chemical<br />
mutagen. The fact that diverse phenotypes were observed suggested<br />
that tissue culture is a useful method for <strong>in</strong>duc<strong>in</strong>g embryonic<br />
mutations.<br />
Retrotransposon Tos17 is activated and transposed<br />
throughout the chromosome dur<strong>in</strong>g tissue culture, thus spoil<strong>in</strong>g<br />
functional genes (Hirochika et al 1996). Because of this,<br />
Genetic diversity, evolution, and alien <strong>in</strong>trogression 185
Tos17 could be a useful alternative for gene tagg<strong>in</strong>g. An <strong>in</strong>crease<br />
<strong>in</strong> the copy number of Tos17 was recognized <strong>in</strong> some of<br />
the mutants. Some of these mutations might have been caused<br />
by the <strong>in</strong>sertion of Tos17. However, whether or not the <strong>in</strong>sertion<br />
of Tos17 was responsible for these mutations is still not<br />
clear. There were mutations <strong>in</strong> which no <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> copy number<br />
was observed. Other transposons or factors may be responsible<br />
for these mutations.<br />
References<br />
Hirochika H, Sugimoto K, Otsuki Y, Tsugawa H, Kanda M. 1996.<br />
Retrotransposons of rice <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> mutations <strong>in</strong>duced by<br />
tissue culture. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93:7783-7788.<br />
Hong SK, Aoki T, Kitano H, Satoh H, Nagato Y. 1995. Phenotypic<br />
diversity of 188 rice embryo mutants. Dev. Genet. 16:298-<br />
310.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ addresses: T. Iwamoto, H. Imai, H. Kitano, Graduate School<br />
of Bioagricultural Sciences; S.K. Hong and M. Matsuoka,<br />
Bioscience Center, Nagoya University, Furo-cho, Chikusa,<br />
Nagoya 464-8601, Japan.<br />
Genetic diversity <strong>in</strong> Korean japonica rice cultivars<br />
S.J. Kwon, S.N. Ahn, C.I. Yang, H.C. Hong, Y.K. Kim, J.P. Suh, H.G. Hwang, H.P. Moon, and H.C. Choi<br />
The genetic diversity <strong>in</strong> 123 japonica rice cultivars developed at the National Crop Experiment Station (NCES), National Honam<br />
Agricultural Experiment Station (NHAES), and National Yeongnam Agricultural Experiment Station (NYAES) <strong>in</strong> Korea from 1933<br />
to 1998 was assessed us<strong>in</strong>g 65 simple sequence repeats (SSRs) represent<strong>in</strong>g 65 loci with a total of 324 alleles. The genetic<br />
diversity of 123 japonica cultivars was compared by breed<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>stitute and period. The genetic diversity of the cultivars <strong>in</strong>creased<br />
slightly over time, reflect<strong>in</strong>g the different genetic backgrounds of the cultivars developed for different ecosystems.<br />
Overall, the diversity of the current japonica cultivars seems relatively narrow probably because of high selection pressure for<br />
good gra<strong>in</strong> quality and repeated use of the same-orig<strong>in</strong> parents with proven yield<strong>in</strong>g ability <strong>in</strong> the breed<strong>in</strong>g program.<br />
Plant breeders are concerned about genetic diversity because<br />
it is a prerequisite for recomb<strong>in</strong>ed improvement of various agronomic<br />
characters <strong>in</strong> a breed<strong>in</strong>g program and it could help<br />
reduce the risk of widespread epidemics of <strong>in</strong>sect pests and<br />
diseases. For the last decade, the rice breed<strong>in</strong>g program <strong>in</strong><br />
Korea has focused on develop<strong>in</strong>g rice cultivars with high gra<strong>in</strong><br />
quality. Many of these high-quality rice varieties shared a common<br />
ancestry and probably lacked genetic diversity. The exclusive<br />
grow<strong>in</strong>g of japonica cultivars <strong>in</strong> the late 1980s promoted<br />
the narrow genetic diversity of cultivated rice varieties<br />
(Kim et al 1994).<br />
DNA markers such as microsatellite or simple sequence<br />
repeats (SSRs) provide an efficient way of evaluat<strong>in</strong>g genetic<br />
diversity <strong>in</strong> germplasm because of their highly polymorphic<br />
nature. This study was carried out to (1) monitor the changes<br />
<strong>in</strong> genetic diversity of rice cultivars developed dur<strong>in</strong>g 1933-<br />
98, (2) <strong>in</strong>vestigate the probable causes for any change <strong>in</strong> genetic<br />
diversity, and (3) provide a basis for the large-scale evaluation<br />
of molecular divergence <strong>in</strong> rice germplasm.<br />
Materials and methods<br />
A total of 123 rice cultivars were used <strong>in</strong> this study. DNA was<br />
extracted as described <strong>in</strong> Causse et al (1994). A set of 65<br />
microsatellite markers was used to assess genetic diversity<br />
(Table 1). The procedures for polymerase cha<strong>in</strong> reaction (PCR)<br />
for simple sequence length polymorphism (SSLP) analysis and<br />
silver-sta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g were those as described by Panaud et al (1996).<br />
Band profiles for each cultivar were rated 1 or 0 to <strong>in</strong>dicate<br />
the presence or the absence, respectively, of specific bands.<br />
Genetic distances (GD) among all 7,503 pairs of 123 cultivars<br />
were estimated from molecular data by Nei’s distance equation<br />
(Nei 1987). The unweighted pair group method with mean<br />
(UPGMA) <strong>in</strong> the computer program NTSYS-PC was used to<br />
carry out cluster analysis. The polymorphic <strong>in</strong>formation content<br />
(PIC) value was used to refer the related value of each<br />
marker to the amount of polymorphism exhibited (Anderson<br />
et al 1993).<br />
Results and discussion<br />
Table 1 summarizes the number of alleles detected per marker.<br />
All 65 microsatellite markers detected polymorphism among<br />
the 123 japonica cultivars. A total of 324 alleles were revealed<br />
with a mean of 4.99 per marker. Three hundred twenty-four<br />
loci differentiated at least one cultivar from the others. The<br />
PIC value was computed for each marker (Table 1). OSR13,<br />
OSR31, and CT531 had the lowest PIC value (0.016), whereas<br />
CT19 had the highest (0.876). CT19 can be useful for evaluat<strong>in</strong>g<br />
genetic differentiation and relationship among cultivars.<br />
Nei’s GDs among 7,503 comb<strong>in</strong>ations of 123 japonica<br />
rice cultivars ranged from 0.0091 to 0.3262, with an average<br />
of 0.162 (data not shown). The 123 cultivars were classified<br />
<strong>in</strong>to six groups by cluster analysis based on Nei’s genetic dis-<br />
186 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
Table 1. Number of alleles detected by <strong>in</strong>dividual markers.<br />
Marker Chr. Alleles PIC Marker Chr. Alleles PIC Marker Chr. Alleles PIC<br />
no. (no.) value no. (no.) value no. (no.) value<br />
CT158 1 4 0.476 CT481 5 11 0.689 CT522 9 11 0.790<br />
CT441 1 5 0.443 GA257 5 4 0.471 OSR28 9 5 0.436<br />
CT461 1 5 0.655 OSR34 5 3 0.064 OSR29 9 5 0.454<br />
CT550 1 9 0.772 RM164 5 3 0.569 CT106 10 3 0.173<br />
GA12 1 4 0.618 CT19 6 19 0.876 CT193 10 5 0.560<br />
OSR23 1 2 0.032 CT201 6 3 0.425 CT531 10 2 0.016<br />
OSR27 1 2 0.064 GA534 6 4 0.479 CT14 11 5 0.529<br />
CT41 2 9 0.704 OSR19 6 3 0.466 CT25 11 13 0.847<br />
CT43 2 4 0.650 ATT002 7 9 0.770 CT44 11 5 0.209<br />
CT87 2 3 0.403 CT360 7 3 0.219 CT199 11 6 0.449<br />
CT388 2 4 0.048 CT469 7 4 0.048 CT224 11 6 0.727<br />
GA479 2 7 0.710 GA97 7 4 0.212 GA275 11 6 0.719<br />
OSR08 2 4 0.171 GA337 7 3 0.186 OSR06 11 9 0.810<br />
OSR9B 2 6 0.202 GA397 7 3 0.048 RM167 11 3 0.384<br />
OSR11 2 4 0.110 OSR22 7 5 0.325 CT368 12 3 0.337<br />
OSR26 2 4 0.281 CT56 8 6 0.413 CT462 12 7 0.581<br />
GA580 3 3 0.221 GA408 8 5 0.563 OSR20 12 12 0.848<br />
OSR31 3 2 0.016 OSR07 8 5 0.391 OSR04 nd a 5 0.506<br />
CT206 4 2 0.078 OSR30 8 3 0.048 OSR13 nd 2 0.016<br />
CT404 4 4 0.603 OSR35 8 3 0.315 OSR14 nd 2 0.064<br />
CT500 4 5 0.596 CT6 9 2 0.499 OSR24 nd 4 0.463<br />
OSR15 4 3 0.139 CT131 9 5 0.656<br />
a nd = not detected.<br />
tances. The varieties developed by the same breed<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>stitute<br />
and period showed a tendency to cluster together (data not<br />
shown). These results seemed to imply that group<strong>in</strong>g of cultivars<br />
co<strong>in</strong>cided with the genealogical <strong>in</strong>formation.<br />
Of the 123 cultivars, 60 were developed by NCES, 38<br />
by NHAES, 25 by NYAES, and 3 are foreign <strong>in</strong>troductions.<br />
Table 2 shows the total number of alleles <strong>in</strong>, and the allelic<br />
diversity among, the rice cultivars developed by each breed<strong>in</strong>g<br />
team. The average GD among the NCES-bred cultivars<br />
(0.159) was slightly higher than that of NHAES (0.146), and<br />
NYAES (0.157).<br />
While the major goal of the rice breed<strong>in</strong>g programs <strong>in</strong><br />
the 1960s and 1970s was high yield and stable production,<br />
this later shifted to high gra<strong>in</strong> quality, yield stability, suitability<br />
for direct seed<strong>in</strong>g, and specialty uses. The development of<br />
Korean japonica cultivars can be divided <strong>in</strong>to four periods<br />
based on the priority breed<strong>in</strong>g objectives: 1933 to 1960, 1961<br />
to 1980, 1981 to 1990, and 1991 to 1998. Table 3 summarizes<br />
the trend of changes <strong>in</strong> genetic diversity and number of cultivars<br />
developed with<strong>in</strong> the various periods. GDs and PIC values<br />
among cultivars developed <strong>in</strong> each period ranged from<br />
0.133 (1933-60) to 0.167 (1980s) and 0.323 to 0.408, respectively.<br />
The low level of genetic diversity (0.133) of 24 rice<br />
cultivars developed dur<strong>in</strong>g 1933-60 by NCES and NHAES<br />
resulted from the practice of us<strong>in</strong>g closely related germplasm<br />
<strong>in</strong> breed<strong>in</strong>g programs. “Eunbangju” or pure-l<strong>in</strong>e selections from<br />
this cultivar were used as parents of 15 cultivars; 14 of these<br />
were clustered <strong>in</strong> the same second group.<br />
Table 2. Comparison of allele number and genetic diversity among<br />
japonica rice cultivars developed by the different breed<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>stitutes<br />
<strong>in</strong> Korea.<br />
Character NCES NHAES NYAES Total<br />
Total no. of alleles 287 226 226 324<br />
Range of alleles 1–16 1–11 1–10 1–19<br />
Average of alleles 4.39 3.48 3.48 4.99<br />
Average of PIC 0.410 0.380 0.401 0.411<br />
Average of genetic distances 0.159 0.146 0.157 0.162<br />
No. of cultivars 60 38 25 123<br />
No. of pairwise comb<strong>in</strong>ations 1,770 703 300 7,503<br />
Table 3. Comparison of allele number and genetic diversity among<br />
japonica cultivars, by breed<strong>in</strong>g period.<br />
Character 1910-60 1961-80 1981-90 1991-98<br />
Total no. of alleles 183 188 250 248<br />
Range of alleles 1–11 1–8 1–11 1–12<br />
Average of alleles 2.79 2.89 3.85 3.82<br />
Average of PIC 0.323 0.371 0.408 0.396<br />
Average of genetic 0.133 0.156 0.167 0.161<br />
distances<br />
No. of cultivars 24 16 38 45<br />
No. of pairwise 276 66 703 990<br />
comb<strong>in</strong>ations<br />
Genetic diversity, evolution, and alien <strong>in</strong>trogression 187
The second period, 1961-80, represents the early years<br />
of modern rice breed<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Korea. In the late 1960s, rice breeders<br />
began us<strong>in</strong>g a common pool of elite germplasm to improve<br />
resistance to lodg<strong>in</strong>g and blast disease and obta<strong>in</strong> high yield <strong>in</strong><br />
japonica rice. The GDs among 16 rice cultivars showed a higher<br />
level than those before 1960. Dur<strong>in</strong>g the third period, the breed<strong>in</strong>g<br />
objective was improved gra<strong>in</strong> quality with yield stability.<br />
The average GDs (0.167) among 38 rice cultivars <strong>in</strong> this period<br />
<strong>in</strong>creased, po<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g out that the more diversified genetic<br />
backgrounds might be <strong>in</strong>duced s<strong>in</strong>ce those conta<strong>in</strong>ed an almost<br />
equal number of rice varieties developed by the three<br />
breed<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>stitutes. In the last period, 45 rice cultivars were<br />
developed with diverse goals such as specialty uses, adaptability<br />
to direct seed<strong>in</strong>g, and others. When these specialty rice<br />
cultivars are not <strong>in</strong>cluded, the genetic diversity decreased to<br />
0.157.<br />
Overall, the diversity of the current japonica cultivars<br />
seems relatively narrow even though the three breed<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>stitutes<br />
ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> separate but complementary breed<strong>in</strong>g programs<br />
(Kim et al 1994). This is evident when the Tongil-type cultivars<br />
grown <strong>in</strong> the 1980s disappeared <strong>in</strong> farmers’ fields <strong>in</strong> the<br />
1990s because of their unfavorable gra<strong>in</strong> quality. The high<br />
selection pressure for good gra<strong>in</strong> quality and repeated use of<br />
the same-orig<strong>in</strong> parents with proven yield<strong>in</strong>g ability <strong>in</strong> breed<strong>in</strong>g<br />
programs might have contributed to <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g the genetic<br />
similarity (Park et al 1990).<br />
References<br />
Anderson JA, Churchill GA, Autrique JE, Tanksley SD, Sorrells ME.<br />
1993. Optimiz<strong>in</strong>g parental selection for genetic l<strong>in</strong>kage maps.<br />
Genome 36:181-186.<br />
Causse MA, Fulton TM, Cho YG, Ahn SN, Chunwongse J, Wu KS,<br />
Xiao JH, Yu ZH, Ronald PC, Harr<strong>in</strong>gton SE, Second G,<br />
McCouch SR, Tanksley SD. 1994. Saturated molecular map<br />
of the rice genome based on an <strong>in</strong>traspecific backcross population.<br />
<strong>Genetics</strong> 138:1251-1274.<br />
Kim KH, Cho SY, Moon HP, Choi HC. 1994. Breed<strong>in</strong>g strategy for<br />
improvement and diversification of gra<strong>in</strong> quality <strong>in</strong> rice. Korean<br />
J. Breed. (suppl. 2):3-19.<br />
Nei M. 1987. Molecular evolutionary genetics. Columbia, New York<br />
(USA): Columbia University Press.<br />
Panaud O, Chen X, McCouch SR. 1996. Development of<br />
microsatellite markers and chracterization of simple sequence<br />
length polymorphism (SSLP) <strong>in</strong> rice (Oryza sativa L.). Mol.<br />
Gen. Genet. 252:597-607.<br />
Park RK, Cho SY, Moon HP, Choi HC, Park NK, Choi YK. 1990.<br />
<strong>Rice</strong> varietal improvement <strong>in</strong> Korea. Suwon (Korea): Rural<br />
Development Adm<strong>in</strong>istration.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ addresses: S.J. Kwon, C.I. Yang, H.C. Hong, Y.K. Kim,<br />
J.P. Suh, H.G. Hwang, and H.C. Choi, National Crop Experiment<br />
Station, RDA, Suwon 441-100; S.N. Ahn, Department<br />
of Agronomy, Chungnam National University, Taejon 305-<br />
764; H.P. Moon, National Yeongnam Agricultural Experiment<br />
Station, RDA, Milyang 627-130, Korea. E-mail:<br />
sjkwon@nces.go.kr.<br />
Genetic diversity based on isozyme pattern<br />
of rice germplasm <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a<br />
S.X. Tang, Y.Z. Jiang, X.H. Wei, D.S. Brar, and G.S. Khush<br />
Genetic diversity was studied <strong>in</strong> 4,408 cultivars of core germplasm selected from 56,220 Ch<strong>in</strong>ese rice accessions on the basis<br />
of 12 isozyme loci, Pgi-1, Pgi-2, Amp-1, Amp-2, Amp-3, Amp-4, Sdh-1, Adh-1, Est-1, Est-2, Est-5, and Est-9, analyzed<br />
through starch gel electrophoresis. Among the materials exam<strong>in</strong>ed, 431 different genotypes were detected; genotypic diversity<br />
was 3.845. The average gene diversity <strong>in</strong>dex <strong>in</strong> all tested loci was 0.248. Based on isozyme allele pattern, there was clear<br />
concordance to identify materials as <strong>in</strong>dica (Hsien), japonica (Keng), and <strong>in</strong>termediate groups, with the ratios of 68.7%,<br />
30.3%, and 0.98%, respectively. These figures matched well with 67.0% <strong>in</strong>dica and 32.1% japonica based on the classification<br />
of morphological characters. The average genetic diversity of <strong>in</strong>dica rice was 0.193, which was much higher than that of<br />
japonica (0.092). Amp-2 had the highest coefficient of genetic differentiation (Gst = 0.847) between <strong>in</strong>dica and japonica,<br />
followed by Pgi-1, Pgi-2, and Est-2. It was found that <strong>in</strong> six rice ecoregions <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a, the cultivars <strong>in</strong> the southwest ecoregion<br />
had the highest average genetic diversity (Ht = 0.266), followed by the south and central ecoregions. A new allele was<br />
identified <strong>in</strong> only four <strong>in</strong>dica cultivars (Makezhan, Jibianzi, Changmaodao, and Jiefan 16) out of the 4,408 genotypes analyzed.<br />
This was designated Pgi-1 5 .<br />
Core germplasm (core collection) is an important aspect <strong>in</strong><br />
expand<strong>in</strong>g crop genetic resources. To fully understand the characters<br />
of core germplasm representatives, it is necessary to<br />
determ<strong>in</strong>e genetic variation <strong>in</strong> terms of morphological and biochemical<br />
traits.<br />
<strong>Rice</strong> is the most important crop <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a. More than<br />
70,000 rice accessions are stored <strong>in</strong> the Ch<strong>in</strong>a National Gene<br />
Bank. Two dist<strong>in</strong>ct subspecies—<strong>in</strong>dica (Hsien) and japonica<br />
(Keng)—are well documented. Isozyme analysis provided a<br />
valuable estimation of genetic variation and a classification of<br />
188 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
ice germplasm (Fu and Pai 1979, Second 1982, Glaszmann<br />
1987). But geographic distribution and genetic diversity based<br />
on isozyme pattern have not been fully analyzed among Ch<strong>in</strong>ese<br />
rice genetic resources. Ch<strong>in</strong>a is sett<strong>in</strong>g up rice core<br />
germplasm us<strong>in</strong>g many methods, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g cluster analysis and<br />
random selection. Our study aimed to understand the geographic<br />
distribution of isozyme variation and genetic diversity<br />
<strong>in</strong> rice germplasm <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a. This will help us set up core<br />
germplasm for effective use <strong>in</strong> rice breed<strong>in</strong>g, aside from understand<strong>in</strong>g<br />
the orig<strong>in</strong> of rice.<br />
Materials and methods<br />
From a total of 56,220 accessions of Ch<strong>in</strong>ese rice germplasm,<br />
4,408 cultivars of the primary core collection, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g traditional<br />
landraces, modern varieties, and hybrid rice (A, B, and<br />
R l<strong>in</strong>es), were planted <strong>in</strong> the experimental fields of the Ch<strong>in</strong>a<br />
National <strong>Rice</strong> Research Institute (CNRRI), Hangzhou, Ch<strong>in</strong>a.<br />
The harvested seeds of all 4,408 cultivars were analyzed for<br />
isozyme pattern at the <strong>IRRI</strong> isozyme laboratory.<br />
The seeds were germ<strong>in</strong>ated <strong>in</strong> plastic dishes at ambient<br />
temperature under natural light. Crude extracts of water-soluble<br />
prote<strong>in</strong>s were prepared from the plumule and coleoptile of the<br />
seedl<strong>in</strong>gs 4–6 d after germ<strong>in</strong>ation by homogenization <strong>in</strong> a small<br />
amount of distilled water. Imbibed filter paper wicks were then<br />
<strong>in</strong>serted <strong>in</strong>to the starch gel and subjected to starch gel electrophoresis<br />
at 2 °C. Each gel accommodated 30 samples, together<br />
with IR36 (<strong>in</strong>dica) and Azucena (japonica). In buffer system I<br />
with pH 8, the five enzymes assayed were phosphoglucose<br />
isomerase (Pgi-1, Pgi-2), am<strong>in</strong>opeptidase (Amp-1, Amp-2,<br />
Amp-3, and Amp-4), shikimate dehydrogenase (Sdh-1), alcohol<br />
dehydrogenase (Adh-1), and esterase (Est-1, Est-2, Est-5,<br />
and Est-9), follow<strong>in</strong>g procedures described by Glaszmann<br />
(1988).<br />
Nei’s (1975) gene diversity (H) and average gene diversity<br />
<strong>in</strong>dices (Ht) were used as a measurement of isozyme variation.<br />
Results and discussion<br />
Allelic variation<br />
The five enzymes allowed the detection of 52 alleles at 12<br />
polymorphic loci (Pgi-1, Pgi-2, Amp-1, Amp-2, Amp-3, Amp-<br />
4, Sdh-1, Adh-1, Est-1, Est-2, Est-5, and Est-9) among the 4,408<br />
assayed cultivars. The number of alleles per locus ranged from<br />
2 to 7, with an average of 4.3 (Table 1). H varied from 0.012<br />
for Amp-4 to 0.547 for Est-2. Ht was 0.248. Five loci—Est-2,<br />
Pgi-1, Pgi-2, Amp-2, and Sdh-1—had higher values of H<br />
(H>0.250). Two other loci, Amp-4 and Est-5, showed lower<br />
<strong>in</strong>dices (H30%), while<br />
Amp-4 had the lowest (DP = 0.5%).<br />
Table 1. Enzyme loci identified with polymorphism <strong>in</strong>dices <strong>in</strong> 4,408<br />
cultivars <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a.<br />
Enzyme Locus No. of H a % DP b<br />
alleles<br />
Phosphoglucose isomerase Pgi-1 5 c 0.484 40.3<br />
Pgi-2 4 0.452 34.4<br />
Am<strong>in</strong>opeptidase Amp-1 7 0.162 8.6<br />
Amp-2 4 0.437 30.8<br />
Amp-3 7 0.138 6.9<br />
Amp-4 4 0.012 0.5<br />
Shikimate dehydrogenase Sdh-1 5 0.266 15.5<br />
Alcohol dehydrogenase Adh-1 4 0.149 7.9<br />
Esterase Est-1 2 0.132 7.1<br />
Est-2 4 0.547 49.6<br />
Est-5 3 0.064 3.2<br />
Est-9 3 0.132 7.1<br />
Av 4.3 0.248 17.7<br />
a H = genetic diversity for each isozyme locus. b DP = degree of polymorphism for<br />
each enzyme. c Includ<strong>in</strong>g null allele.<br />
Among the 4,408 genotypes exam<strong>in</strong>ed, 431 different<br />
genotypes were detected on the basis of 54 isozyme alleles.<br />
Genotypic diversity was 3.845.<br />
Isozyme diversity <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>dica and japonica subspecies<br />
Based on isozyme patterns as described by Glaszmann (1987,<br />
1988), the cultivars were divided <strong>in</strong>to two major groups: <strong>in</strong>dica<br />
(Hsien, 3,028 cultivars) and japonica (Keng, 1,337 cultivars)<br />
as well as <strong>in</strong>termediate (43 cultivars). Indica, japonica,<br />
and <strong>in</strong>termediate accounted for 68.69%, 30.33%, and 0.98%,<br />
respectively. This matched well with 66.97% <strong>in</strong>dica and<br />
32.06% japonica based on the classification of morphological<br />
characters. In terms of distribution of allele frequency, 0.861<br />
of Pgi-1 1 was <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>dica, but 0.997 of Pgi-1 2 was <strong>in</strong> japonica.<br />
Similar observations were obta<strong>in</strong>ed from Amp-2 and Est-2:<br />
0.996 of Amp-2 2 and 0.689 of Est-2 2 were <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>dica, but 0.993<br />
of Amp-2 1 and 0.890 of Est-2 null were <strong>in</strong> japonica (Table 2). In<br />
contrast, the average gene diversity for <strong>in</strong>dica was 0.193, which<br />
was much higher than that of japonica (0.092). Higher genetic<br />
diversity for an <strong>in</strong>dividual locus existed for Pgi-2 (0.501), Est-<br />
2 (0.450), Sdh-1 (0.334), and Pgi-1 (0.239) <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>dica, while it<br />
was 0.208 for Amp-1 and 0.202 for Est-2 <strong>in</strong> japonica.<br />
The average coefficient of genetic differentiation (Gst)<br />
between <strong>in</strong>dica and japonica for 12 isozyme loci was 0.281.<br />
The highest Gst was found for locus Amp-2 (0.847), followed<br />
by Pgi-1 (0.745), Pgi-2 (0.437), and Est-2 (0.404). This revealed<br />
a high level of genetic differentiation between <strong>in</strong>dica<br />
and japonica for these four isozyme loci. Very low genetic<br />
differentiation (Gst
Table 2. Genetic diversity <strong>in</strong> isozyme patterns and genetic differentiation<br />
<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>dica and japonica subspecies.<br />
Isozyme Allele Indica Japonica Total Gst b<br />
Pgi-1 1 0.861 0.003 0.598<br />
2 0.139 0.997 0.402 0.745<br />
H 0.239 0.006 0.481<br />
Pgi-2 1 0.507 0.996 0.656<br />
2 0.492 0.004 0.343 0.437<br />
3 0.001 0 0.001<br />
H 0.501 0.008 0.452<br />
Amp-1 1 0.933 0.883 0.917<br />
2 0.001 0 0.001<br />
3 0 0.113 0.035<br />
4 0.058 0.001 0.040 0.071<br />
5 0.008 0 0.006<br />
6 0 0.003 0.001<br />
H 0.126 0.208 0.156<br />
Amp-2 1 0.001 0.933 0.286<br />
2 0.996 0.007 0.693<br />
3 0.003 0.059 0.020 0.847<br />
4 0 0.001 0.001<br />
H 0.008 0.126 0.438<br />
Amp-3 0 0.001 0.006 0.002<br />
1 0.923 0.957 0.933<br />
2 0.061 0.035 0.052<br />
3 0.014 0 0.010 0.113<br />
4 0 0.001 0.001<br />
5 0.001 0 0.001<br />
6 0 0.001 0.001<br />
H 0.144 0.083 0.128<br />
Amp-4 0 0 0.001 0.001<br />
1 0.998 0.991 0.995<br />
2 0.001 0.005 0.002 0.100<br />
4 0.001 0.003 0.002<br />
H 0.004 0.018 0.010<br />
Sdh-1 0 0.001 0.001 0.001<br />
1 0.193 0.017 0.139<br />
2 0.793 0.964 0.845 0.243<br />
3 0.012 0.017 0.014<br />
4 0.001 0.001 0.001<br />
H 0.334 0.070 0.267<br />
Adh-1 0 0.048 0.029 0.042<br />
1 0.925 0.915 0.922<br />
2 0.006 0.055 0.021 0.017<br />
3 0.021 0.001 0.015<br />
H 0.142 0.159 0.148<br />
Est-1 0 0.076 0.058 0.071<br />
1 0.924 0.942 0.929 0.053<br />
H 0.141 0.109 0.132<br />
Est-2 0 0.244 0.890 0.442<br />
1 0.057 0.041 0.052<br />
2 0.698 0.069 0.505 0.404<br />
3 0.001 0 0.001<br />
H 0.450 0.202 0.547<br />
Est-5 0 0.025 0.048 0.032<br />
1 0.974 0.952 0.967 0.109<br />
2 0.001 0 0.001<br />
H 0.051 0.091 0.064<br />
Est-9 0 0.002 0.001 0.002<br />
1 0.094 0.010 0.068 0.252<br />
2 0.904 0.989 0.930<br />
H 0.174 0.022 0.131<br />
Total Ht a 0.193 0.092 0.246 0.283<br />
tral Ch<strong>in</strong>a double- and s<strong>in</strong>gle-rice (<strong>in</strong>dica and japonica) region,<br />
Region III is the southwest plateau region of s<strong>in</strong>gle and<br />
double rice (<strong>in</strong>dica and japonica), Region IV is the North Ch<strong>in</strong>a<br />
s<strong>in</strong>gle-rice (japonica) region, Region V is the northeast Ch<strong>in</strong>a<br />
early matur<strong>in</strong>g and s<strong>in</strong>gle-rice (japonica) region, and Region<br />
VI is the northwest Ch<strong>in</strong>a s<strong>in</strong>gle-rice (japonica) dry region.<br />
More than 80% of the rice area and the germplasm collection<br />
is located <strong>in</strong> ecoregions I, II, and III.<br />
Table 3 shows the geographic distribution of 54 alleles<br />
and the H values of 12 isozyme loci <strong>in</strong> six rice ecoregions,<br />
reveal<strong>in</strong>g similarities <strong>in</strong> genetic diversity based on isozyme<br />
and morphological characters. Region III had the highest average<br />
genetic diversity (Ht = 0.266), with 3.50 alleles per locus,<br />
which matched well with the highest morphological diversity<br />
reported by many researchers (Huang et al 1996). Regions<br />
I and II, major rice areas <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a, had a higher genetic<br />
diversity (Ht = 0.226 for both), with average alleles number<strong>in</strong>g<br />
3.42 and 3.75 per locus, respectively. Region V had the<br />
lowest average genetic diversity (Ht = 0.057), with the smallest<br />
allele number of 2.08 per locus. This rice region is <strong>in</strong> the<br />
high latitude (40–52°N), with only early matur<strong>in</strong>g japonica<br />
rice varieties.<br />
A new allele, Pgi-1 5<br />
A new allele, for Pgi-1, located on chromosome 4 and which<br />
had not been reported before, was identified from four Ch<strong>in</strong>ese<br />
<strong>in</strong>dica cultivars (Makezhan, Jibianzi, Changmaodao, and<br />
Jiefan 16) (0.088%) among the 4,408 cultivars. This new allele<br />
was tentatively designated as Pgi-1 5 .<br />
In the 1970s-’80s, some researchers identified Yunnan<br />
as the orig<strong>in</strong> of Ch<strong>in</strong>ese cultivated rice. One of the reasons<br />
was the existence of a rich morphological variation <strong>in</strong> Yunnan<br />
landraces caused by the variable eco-environment <strong>in</strong> the Yunnan<br />
Plateau. However, some reports (Huang et al 1996) argued<br />
that the great morphological diversity of Yunnan rice was the<br />
result of a migration of germplasm from some border countries<br />
(Myanmar, Vietnam, and Lao PDR). These reports said<br />
that central Ch<strong>in</strong>a (more exactly, the area from the middle bas<strong>in</strong><br />
of the Yangtze River up to the bas<strong>in</strong> of the Huai River)<br />
could be the orig<strong>in</strong> of cultivated rice <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a. Although our<br />
study revealed that cultivated rice <strong>in</strong> Region III (especially <strong>in</strong><br />
Yunnan) had the highest gene diversity <strong>in</strong>dex <strong>in</strong> terms of<br />
isozyme level, the average number of alleles <strong>in</strong> 12 isozyme<br />
loci <strong>in</strong> Region III was 3.5, less than that of Region II (3.75). In<br />
contrast, cultivars <strong>in</strong> Region II had the alleles of Pgi-1 3 , Amp-<br />
1 null , Amp-1 6 , Amp-3 null , Amp-3 4 , Sdh-1 null t, and Est-9 null . The<br />
tested cultivars <strong>in</strong> Region III did not have these alleles. This<br />
result supports the hypothesis that Ch<strong>in</strong>ese cultivated rice orig<strong>in</strong>ated<br />
<strong>in</strong>dependently from central Ch<strong>in</strong>a.<br />
It is not clear what caused differentiation at the isozyme<br />
level (Li and Rutger 2000). But the dist<strong>in</strong>ct multilocus phenotypes<br />
may be evidence of Ch<strong>in</strong>ese Hsien (<strong>in</strong>dica) and Keng<br />
(japonica) subspecies be<strong>in</strong>g domesticated <strong>in</strong> parallel.<br />
a Ht = average genetic diversity for all isozyme loci. b Gst = coefficient of genetic<br />
differentiation between <strong>in</strong>dica and japonica.<br />
190 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
Table 3. Genetic diversity for 12 isozyme loci <strong>in</strong> six rice ecoregions a <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a.<br />
Isozyme<br />
Alleles<br />
Ecoregion a<br />
I II III IV V VI<br />
Pgi-1 No. 3 3 3 3 1 2<br />
H 0.454 0.452 0.499 0.515 0 0.364<br />
Pgi-2 No. 3 3 3 2 3 2<br />
H 0.496 0.455 0.313 0.214 0.066 0.232<br />
Amp-1 No. 5 7 5 4 3 3<br />
H 0.125 0.115 0.278 0.189 0.038 0.072<br />
Amp-2 No. 3 3 4 2 3 3<br />
H 0.268 0.400 0.509 0.348 0.130 0.418<br />
Amp-3 No. 5 7 5 3 3 3<br />
H 0.118 0.122 0.171 0.129 0.066 0.030<br />
Amp-4 No. 2 4 4 3 2 2<br />
H 0.002 0.010 0.014 0.035 0.033 0.014<br />
Sdh-1 No. 5 4 4 3 1 3<br />
H 0.352 0.286 0.153 0.146 0 0.180<br />
Adh-1 No. 4 4 4 4 3 4<br />
H 0.064 0.138 0.249 0.167 0.130 0.074<br />
Est-1 No. 2 2 2 2 2 2<br />
H 0.099 0.095 0.232 0.139 0.033 0.099<br />
Est-2 No. 3 3 4 3 2 3<br />
H 0.448 0.521 0.504 0.512 0.185 0.342<br />
Est-5 No. 3 2 2 2 1 2<br />
H 0.039 0.043 0.135 0.028 0 0.030<br />
Est-9 No. 3 3 2 2 1 2<br />
H 0.249 0.077 0.132 0.014 0 0.043<br />
Average No. 3.42 3.75 3.50 2.75 2.08 2.58<br />
H 0.226 0.226 0.266 0.203 0.057 0.158<br />
a <strong>Rice</strong> ecoregions: I = South Ch<strong>in</strong>a, II = central Ch<strong>in</strong>a, III = southwest Ch<strong>in</strong>a, IV = North Ch<strong>in</strong>a, V =<br />
northeast Ch<strong>in</strong>a, VI = northwest Ch<strong>in</strong>a.<br />
References<br />
Fu PY, Pai C. 1979. Genetic studies on isozymes <strong>in</strong> rice plant. II.<br />
Classification and geographical distribution of cultivated rice<br />
through isozyme studies. J. Agric. Assoc. Ch<strong>in</strong>a 107:1-6. (In<br />
Ch<strong>in</strong>ese.)<br />
Glaszmann JC. 1987. Isozymes and classification of Asian rice varieties.<br />
Theor. Appl. Genet. 74:21-30.<br />
Glaszmann JC. 1988. Geographic pattern of variation among Asian<br />
native rice cultivars (Oryza sativa L.) based on 15 isozyme<br />
loci. Genome 30:782-792.<br />
Huang YH, Sun XL, Wang XK. 1996. Study on the center of genetic<br />
diversity of Ch<strong>in</strong>ese cultivated rice. In: Wang XK, Sun XL,<br />
editors. Orig<strong>in</strong> and differentiation of Ch<strong>in</strong>ese cultivated rices.<br />
Ch<strong>in</strong>a Agric. Univ. Press, Beij<strong>in</strong>g. p 85-91. (In Ch<strong>in</strong>ese.)<br />
Li ZK, Rutger JN. 2000. Geographic distribution and multilocus<br />
organization of isozyme variation of rice (Oryza sativa L.).<br />
Theor. Appl. Genet. 101:379-387.<br />
Nei M. 1975. Molecular population genetics and evolution. New<br />
York: Elsevier Sciences Publish<strong>in</strong>g Co.<br />
Second G. 1982. Orig<strong>in</strong> of the genetic diversity of cultivated rice<br />
(Oryza spp.): study on the polymorphism scored at 40 isozyme<br />
loci. Jpn. J. Genet. 57:25-57.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ addresses: S.X. Tang, D.S. Brar, and G.S. Khush, <strong>International</strong><br />
<strong>Rice</strong> Research Institute, DAPO Box 7777, Metro Manila,<br />
Philipp<strong>in</strong>es; Y.C. Jiang and X.H. Wei, Ch<strong>in</strong>a National<br />
<strong>Rice</strong> Research Institute, Hangzhou 310006, Ch<strong>in</strong>a.<br />
Acknowledgment: We are grateful to Ms. Ruth E. McNally for her<br />
valuable help <strong>in</strong> isozyme analysis. This research was supported<br />
by <strong>IRRI</strong> and Project 973 <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a.<br />
Genetic diversity, evolution, and alien <strong>in</strong>trogression 191
Differential patterns of isozyme loci of Adh and Ldh between<br />
upland and lowland rice varieties<br />
L.J. Chen, D.S. Lee, and H.S. Suh<br />
N<strong>in</strong>ety-eight rice genotypes of diverse orig<strong>in</strong>s were assayed for alcohol dehydrogenase (Adh) and lactate dehydrogenase (Ldh)<br />
isozyme loci us<strong>in</strong>g starch-gel electrophoresis. Four alleles <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g null were detected <strong>in</strong> Adh1 as well as <strong>in</strong> Ldh1. The genetic<br />
polymorphism revealed by Adh1 and Ldh1 for all study materials exhibited the same patterns. Polymorphisms for alleles 1 and<br />
2 of Adh1 and Ldh1 were observed with<strong>in</strong> the upland rice group, but not <strong>in</strong> lowland rice, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g Oryza rufipogon and O.<br />
barthii. Only upland rice genotypes possessed allele 2 of Adh1 and Ldh1. Some desirable traits of upland rice may be<br />
associated with allele 2 of Adh1 and Ldh1 loci. Moreover, Adh and Ldh are believed to be associated with drought and coldstress<br />
tolerance, and their isozyme variability <strong>in</strong> upland rice may also reflect agronomic and evolutionary significance <strong>in</strong> upland<br />
rice.<br />
<strong>Rice</strong> varieties are usually classified <strong>in</strong>to <strong>in</strong>dica and japonica<br />
types based on various morphological characters and isozyme<br />
polymorphism. Furthermore, they are classified <strong>in</strong>to lowland<br />
and upland varieties based on their cultivation habits and some<br />
contrast<strong>in</strong>g morphological characteristics. Although upland rice<br />
is normally considered to be an ecotype rather than a subspecies<br />
(Mor<strong>in</strong>aga 1968, Cheng 1987, Glaszmann 1988), it is<br />
believed to play an important role <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>dica-japonica differentiation.<br />
Cheng (1987) presumed that hsien (<strong>in</strong>dica) rice or Oryza<br />
rufipogon differentiated <strong>in</strong>to upland rice, which differentiated<br />
<strong>in</strong>to keng (japonica) rice <strong>in</strong> Yunnan, Ch<strong>in</strong>a. Thus, the genetic<br />
analysis of upland landraces compared with lowland rice is<br />
important for understand<strong>in</strong>g the domestication of cultivated<br />
rice and for search<strong>in</strong>g for beneficial genes <strong>in</strong> upland rice.<br />
Isozyme polymorphism <strong>in</strong> rice is <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly used <strong>in</strong><br />
varietal classification. However, differences between upland<br />
and lowland rice at particular isozyme loci had not ga<strong>in</strong>ed much<br />
attention <strong>in</strong> previous reports (Sun et al 1994, Nagam<strong>in</strong>e et al<br />
1992). Alcohol dehydrogenase (Adh) is an essential enzyme<br />
<strong>in</strong> anaerobic metabolism, associated with drought stress and<br />
cold stress <strong>in</strong> both maize and Arabidopsis (Dolferus et al 1994).<br />
Lactate dehydrogenase (Ldh) is also associated with anaerobic<br />
stress (Li et al 1993). Because of their physiological and<br />
evolutionary significance, Adh and Ldh genes have been<br />
cloned, sequenced, and mapped <strong>in</strong> rice (Li et al 1994, Ge et al<br />
1999).<br />
This study was conducted to determ<strong>in</strong>e genetic variability<br />
<strong>in</strong> Adh and Ldh isozymes <strong>in</strong> upland landraces and compare<br />
them with lowland varieties, and to understand the significance<br />
of upland rice <strong>in</strong> the domestication and differentiation of cultivated<br />
rice.<br />
Materials and methods<br />
A total of 98 rice genotypes composed of cultivated, weedy,<br />
and wild rice species from all over the world were studied. Of<br />
these, O. sativa accounted for 25 upland landraces and 36 lowland<br />
cultivated and weedy stra<strong>in</strong>s, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dica and japonica<br />
types collected from Asia and America; O. rufipogon comprised<br />
35 stra<strong>in</strong>s, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g perennial and annual types collected<br />
from Ch<strong>in</strong>a; and O. barthii conta<strong>in</strong>ed 2 stra<strong>in</strong>s orig<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g<br />
from Africa.<br />
Adh and Ldh loci were assayed by starch-gel (system H,<br />
Tris-citric, pH 7.6) methods (Glaszmann et al 1988). The sta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />
bands of Adh were exam<strong>in</strong>ed us<strong>in</strong>g the systems suggested<br />
by Morishima and Glaszmann (1990). The gel sta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g of Ldh<br />
was performed us<strong>in</strong>g the procedure described by Chen et al<br />
(2000). The numeral nomenclature systems (Morishima and<br />
Glaszmann 1986) were employed for designat<strong>in</strong>g the alleles<br />
of Ldh.<br />
The genetic diversity of each locus (Div.) was calculated<br />
by the follow<strong>in</strong>g formula: Div. = 1– Σx ij2 , where x ij <strong>in</strong>dicates<br />
the frequency of the ith allele at the locus j (Ishikawa et al<br />
1992).<br />
Results and discussion<br />
Isozyme allele detection<br />
Among the stra<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong>vestigated, four alleles, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g a null,<br />
were detected <strong>in</strong> isozyme locus Adh1 (Fig. 1). Likewise, <strong>in</strong><br />
Ldh, four dist<strong>in</strong>ct patterns, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g a null, were observed,<br />
suggest<strong>in</strong>g that the locus of Ldh has four alleles correspond<strong>in</strong>g<br />
to medium-, slow-, and fast-mov<strong>in</strong>g bands, and a null (Fig.<br />
2). The four alleles of Ldh were named Ldh1-1, Ldh1-2, Ldh1-<br />
3, and Ldh1-0 accord<strong>in</strong>g to the suggestion of Morishima and<br />
Glaszmann (1986).<br />
Adh and Ldh variability and its significance<br />
<strong>in</strong> upland rice<br />
The polymorphism revealed by Adh and Ldh <strong>in</strong> all test materials<br />
exhibited the same patterns shown <strong>in</strong> Table 1. Only one<br />
cultivated stra<strong>in</strong>, Basmati 385 from Pakistan, possessed the<br />
allele Ldh1-3, and only the Ch<strong>in</strong>ese weedy stra<strong>in</strong> Lu-tao possessed<br />
the null allele, Ldh1-0.<br />
Generally, polymorphisms for three alleles of Adh1<br />
(Adh1-1, Adh1-2, and Adh1-3) and Ldh1 (Ldh1-1, Ldh1-2, and<br />
Ldh1-3) were not detected with<strong>in</strong> lowland rice, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g O.<br />
sativa, O. rufipogon, and O. barthii, suggest<strong>in</strong>g that there might<br />
192 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
e no <strong>in</strong>dica-japonica differentiation at the Adh1 locus <strong>in</strong> lowland<br />
rice as well as <strong>in</strong> O. rufipogon. In contrast, polymorphisms<br />
for three alleles of Adh (Adh1-1, Adh1-2, and Adh1-3) and<br />
Ldh (Ldh1-1, Ldh1-2, and Ldh1-3) were observed with<strong>in</strong> the<br />
upland rice group, imply<strong>in</strong>g that upland rice may have special<br />
physiological pathways to adapt to diverse environments. Additionally,<br />
only upland rice stra<strong>in</strong>s possessed the allele of Adh1-<br />
2 and Ldh1-2; hence, some desirable traits of upland rice are<br />
probably associated with isozyme markers of Adh1-2 and Ldh1-<br />
2.<br />
In previous reports, Adh1-2 was found to be very rare <strong>in</strong><br />
Asian rice, account<strong>in</strong>g for 4% of the total of 1,688 stra<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong>vestigated<br />
(Glaszmann 1988), and absent <strong>in</strong> Japanese lowland<br />
– 1 5 10 15 20 25 30 –<br />
Adh1<br />
+ +<br />
Fig. 1. Starch-gel zymogram of alcohol dehydrogenase (Adh1). Adh1<br />
has four alleles: Adh1-1, medium-mov<strong>in</strong>g band (lane 25); Adh1-2,<br />
slow-mov<strong>in</strong>g band (lane 20); Adh1-3, fast-mov<strong>in</strong>g band (lane 29);<br />
Adh1-0, null (lane 3). Lanes 1–30: T65 (japonica), IR36 (<strong>in</strong>dica),<br />
Lu-tao (weedy), Heidiaogu (weedy), Salshare (weedy), TKM5<br />
(weedy), Xilaoshuya (<strong>in</strong>dica), Heizhaogu (japonica), Wuzuigu (upland),<br />
ZK8 (upland), Baichangmaogu (upland), Zhaoheigu (upland),<br />
Dalaoyal<strong>in</strong> (upland), Luzigu (upland), Erbaigu (<strong>in</strong>dica),<br />
Lengshuibaigu (japonica), Laoyal<strong>in</strong> (japonica), Baichangmao (upland),<br />
Erlaid<strong>in</strong>g (upland), Gangzhagu (upland), Hongmaoy<strong>in</strong>g<br />
(japonica), Ch54-14 (weedy), Bhadui (weedy), Chiem Do (weedy),<br />
W1714 (weedy), US2 (weedy), Bailiandogu (upland), Heigu (<strong>in</strong>dica),<br />
Basmati 385 (<strong>in</strong>dica), and Mongengshare (weedy).<br />
– 1 5 10 15 20 25 30 –<br />
Ldh1<br />
+ +<br />
Fig. 2. Starch-gel zymogram and <strong>in</strong>terpretation of lactate dehydrogenase<br />
(Ldh1). Ldh1 has four alleles: Ldh1-1, medium-mov<strong>in</strong>g<br />
band (lane 25); Ldh1-2, slow-mov<strong>in</strong>g band (lane 20); Ldh1-3, fastmov<strong>in</strong>g<br />
band (lane 29); Ldh1-0, null (lane 3). Lanes 1–30 (see<br />
legend of Fig. 1).<br />
and upland rice (Ishikawa et al 1992) as well as <strong>in</strong> Madagascar<br />
rice (Ahmadi et al 1991). However, it is not surpris<strong>in</strong>g to<br />
f<strong>in</strong>d a peculiar allele 2 at locus Adh and Ldh <strong>in</strong> a Yunnan <strong>in</strong>digenous<br />
upland landrace, s<strong>in</strong>ce Yunnan is recognized as one<br />
of the centers of genetic diversity of Asian cultivated rice (Sun<br />
et al 1994). This study will complement other early works on<br />
Yunnan <strong>in</strong>digenous rice (Nagam<strong>in</strong>e et al 1992, Sun et al 1994).<br />
Moreover, Adh and Ldh are believed to be associated with<br />
drought, cold, and anaerobic stress tolerance. Isozyme variability<br />
<strong>in</strong> upland rice accord<strong>in</strong>gly may also reflect the agronomic<br />
and evolutionary significance of domestication and differentiation<br />
of cultivated rice <strong>in</strong> upland rice. Further research<br />
is needed to understand this.<br />
References<br />
Ahmadi N, Glaszmann JC, Rabary E. 1991. Traditional highland<br />
rices orig<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g from <strong>in</strong>tersubspecific recomb<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>in</strong> Madagascar.<br />
In: <strong>Rice</strong> genetics II. Los Baños (Philipp<strong>in</strong>es): <strong>International</strong><br />
<strong>Rice</strong> Research Institute. p 67-79.<br />
Chen LJ, Lee DS, Suh HS. 2000. Identification of Ldh isozyme locus<br />
<strong>in</strong> rice (O. sativa complex). Kor. J. Breed. 32 (supp1.1):62-<br />
63.<br />
Cheng KS. 1987. Identification of hsien, keng, and upland rice. In:<br />
Mimeogr. paper. Kunm<strong>in</strong>g (Ch<strong>in</strong>a): Yunnan Academy of Agricultural<br />
Sciences.<br />
Dolferus R, deBruxelles G, Dennis ES, Peacock WJ. 1994. Regulation<br />
of the Arabidopsis Adh-gene by anaerobic and other environmental<br />
stresses. Ann. Bot. (London) 74:301-308.<br />
Ge S, Sang T, Lu BR, Hong DY. 1999. Phylogeny of rice genomes<br />
with emphasis on orig<strong>in</strong>s of allotetraploid species. Proc. Natl.<br />
Acad. Sci. USA 96(25):14400-14405.<br />
Glaszmann JC. 1988. Geographical pattern of variation among Asian<br />
native rice cultivars (O. sativa L.) based on fifteen isozyme<br />
loci. Genome 30:782-792.<br />
Glaszmann JC, De los Reyes BG, Khush GS. 1988. Electrophoretic<br />
variation of isozymes <strong>in</strong> plumules of rice (Oryza sativa L.)—<br />
a key to the identification of 76 alleles at 24 loci. <strong>IRRI</strong> Res.<br />
Paper Series. No. 134. 14 p.<br />
Ishikawa R, Maeda K, Harada T, Niizeki M, Saito K. 1992. Genotypic<br />
variation for 17 isozyme genes among Japanese upland<br />
varieties <strong>in</strong> rice. Jpn. J. Breed. 42:737-746.<br />
Li T, Takano T, Matsumura H, Takeda G. 1993. Anaerobic expression<br />
and structural analysis of rice lactate dehydrogenase gene.<br />
Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs of 7th <strong>International</strong> Congress of SABRAO.<br />
Table 1. Polymorphisms for four alleles of Adh1 and Ldh1 loci <strong>in</strong> the Oryza sativa complex.<br />
Stra<strong>in</strong>s Orig<strong>in</strong> Frequency of Adh1 and Ldh1 alleles Gene<br />
Taxon (no.) diversity<br />
Null Allele 1 Allele 2 Allele 3<br />
Oryza sativa<br />
Upland rice 25 Asia 0 0.64 0.36 0 0.461<br />
16 Yunnan, Ch<strong>in</strong>a 0 0.44 0.56 0 0.493<br />
9 Japan, Philipp<strong>in</strong>es 0 1.00 0 0 0<br />
Lowland rice 36 Asia, America 0.03 0.94 0 0.03 0.115<br />
O. rufipogon 35 Ch<strong>in</strong>a 0 1.00 0 0 0<br />
O. barthii 2 Africa 0 1.00 0 0 0<br />
Genetic diversity, evolution, and alien <strong>in</strong>trogression 193
Changhua (Taiwan): Taichung District Agricultural Improvement<br />
Station and SABRAO.<br />
Li T, Takano T, Nagamura Y, Takeda G. 1994. L<strong>in</strong>kage analysis of<br />
rice lactate dehydrogenase gene. <strong>Rice</strong> Genet. Newsl. 11:109-<br />
111.<br />
Mor<strong>in</strong>aga T. 1968. Orig<strong>in</strong> and geographical distribution of Japanese<br />
rice. Jpn. Agric. Res. Q. 3(2):1-5.<br />
Morishima H, Glaszmann JC. 1986. Gene symbols for isozymes.<br />
<strong>Rice</strong> Genet. Newsl. 3:15-17.<br />
Morishima H, Glaszmann JC. 1990. Current status of isozyme gene<br />
symbols. <strong>Rice</strong> Genet. Newsl. 7:50-57.<br />
Nagam<strong>in</strong>e T, Xiong JH, Xiao Q. 1992. Genetic variation <strong>in</strong> several<br />
isozymes of <strong>in</strong>digenous rice varieties <strong>in</strong> Yunnan Prov<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>in</strong><br />
Ch<strong>in</strong>a. Jpn. J. Breed. 42:507-513.<br />
Sun YL, Cai HW, Wang XK. 1994. Is Yunnan a rice diversity center<br />
<strong>in</strong> isozyme variation <strong>Rice</strong> Genet. Newsl. 11:65.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ address: Laboratory of Plant <strong>Genetics</strong> and Breed<strong>in</strong>g, Department<br />
of Bio-Resources, College of Natural Resources,<br />
Yeungnam University, Kyongsan 712-749, Republic of Korea,<br />
fax: (053)816-2814, e-mail:chenlijuan@hotmail.com.<br />
Genetic diversity <strong>in</strong> seed storage prote<strong>in</strong>s of Bangladeshi<br />
rice cultivars<br />
M.S. Jahan, T. Kumamaru, H. Satoh, and A. Hamid<br />
A total of 467 Bangladeshi rice cultivars were analyzed for endosperm storage prote<strong>in</strong> glutel<strong>in</strong> and prolam<strong>in</strong> compared with<br />
japonica and <strong>in</strong>dica varieties K<strong>in</strong>maze and IR36. Screen<strong>in</strong>g was done by observ<strong>in</strong>g the profiles of sodium dodecyl sulfatepolyacrylamide<br />
gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) on a s<strong>in</strong>gle-seed basis. A wide variation, <strong>in</strong> both band<strong>in</strong>g pattern and sta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>in</strong>tensity of polypeptide bands, was observed for glutel<strong>in</strong> and prolam<strong>in</strong> seed storage prote<strong>in</strong>s. In the glutel<strong>in</strong> acidic subunit,<br />
seven different types were found based on apparent molecular size and sta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>tensity of three major polypeptide bands (α-<br />
1, α-2, and α-3), whereas two k<strong>in</strong>ds of variation were identified at the a-4 level depend<strong>in</strong>g ma<strong>in</strong>ly on molecular size. A great<br />
variation was also detected <strong>in</strong> the case of prolam<strong>in</strong> and the varieties were divided <strong>in</strong>to n<strong>in</strong>e arbitrary groups.<br />
<strong>Rice</strong> constitutes 95% of the cereals consumed <strong>in</strong> Bangladesh<br />
and supplies 68% of the calories and 54% of the prote<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> the<br />
diet of the population. In Bangladesh, rice research ma<strong>in</strong>ly<br />
focused on yield improvement and only limited <strong>in</strong>formation is<br />
available on seed prote<strong>in</strong> diversity. Bhowmik et al (1990) reported<br />
that Bangladeshi rice cultivars had some diversity <strong>in</strong><br />
seed storage prote<strong>in</strong>s and recommended some l<strong>in</strong>es for improv<strong>in</strong>g<br />
gra<strong>in</strong> quality. Our study determ<strong>in</strong>ed the diversity <strong>in</strong><br />
seed storage prote<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> Bangladeshi rice cultivars and established<br />
a basis for genetic improvement.<br />
Characteriz<strong>in</strong>g rice cultivars by SDS-PAGE<br />
Four hundred and sixty-seven Bangladeshi rice cultivars preserved<br />
<strong>in</strong> the Laboratory of Plant Genetic Resources, Kyushu<br />
University, Japan, were used for analyz<strong>in</strong>g storage prote<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong><br />
the seed gra<strong>in</strong>. The extracted prote<strong>in</strong>s were separated by sodium<br />
dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-<br />
PAGE) on a s<strong>in</strong>gle-seed basis. <strong>Rice</strong> glutel<strong>in</strong> is composed of a<br />
and b subunits, which were separated <strong>in</strong>to α-1, α-2, α-3, and<br />
α-4 and β-1, β-2, and β-3. The α-3 band of japonica rice cultivar<br />
K<strong>in</strong>maze was smaller <strong>in</strong> molecular size than that of <strong>in</strong>dica<br />
rice cultivar IR36, whereas the α-4 band of K<strong>in</strong>maze was<br />
larger than that of IR36 (Uemura et al 1996). Based on mobility<br />
and sta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>tensity of α-1, α-2, and α-3 bands, the cultivars<br />
were arbitrarily classified <strong>in</strong>to seven types compared with<br />
K<strong>in</strong>maze and IR36 (Fig. 1). They were characterized as follows:<br />
type 1: α-3 fast-migration type (α-3F); type 2: α-3 high<strong>in</strong>tensity<br />
type (α-3H); type 3: α-3 two-band type, each with<br />
slow and fast migration (α-3SF); type 4: α-2 low <strong>in</strong>tensity with<br />
α-3 two-band type (α-2L/α-3SF); type 5: α-2 and α-3 low<strong>in</strong>tensity<br />
type (α-2L/α-3L); type 6: α-1 high <strong>in</strong>tensity with α-<br />
2 low-<strong>in</strong>tensity type (α-1H/α-2L); and type 7: α-3 slow-migration<br />
type (α-3S). The number of varieties <strong>in</strong> each type was<br />
82, 28, 4, 1, 1, 3, and 348, respectively. In Bangladesh, rice is<br />
grown <strong>in</strong> three seasons, aus (summer), aman (autumn), and<br />
boro (w<strong>in</strong>ter), and each season has one or more ecotypes. For<br />
all seasons, a majority of the varieties are placed <strong>in</strong> type 7.<br />
Two types of variation were detected <strong>in</strong> α-4 level depend<strong>in</strong>g<br />
on the migration (Fig. 2), <strong>in</strong>dicated as α-4 slow-migration<br />
type (α-4S) and α-4 fast-migration type (α-4F). Their<br />
representation <strong>in</strong> the total germplasm was 15% and 85%, respectively;<br />
the former was restricted to aman rice only.<br />
The standard variety K<strong>in</strong>maze had two major prolam<strong>in</strong><br />
bands, 13a and 13b (Kumamaru et al 1988). M<strong>in</strong>akuchi et al<br />
(1994) called the extra band between 13a and 13b “13c.” Compared<br />
with the standard varieties, n<strong>in</strong>e tentative types were<br />
detected <strong>in</strong> Bangladeshi rice varieties (Fig. 3). The first type<br />
was characterized by the same <strong>in</strong>tensity of 13a and 13b, whereas<br />
the high <strong>in</strong>tensity of 13b (13b-H) was identified <strong>in</strong> type 2. Low<strong>in</strong>tensity<br />
13b (13b-L) was found <strong>in</strong> type 3, but was absent <strong>in</strong><br />
type 4. The fifth type had 13c with the absence of 13b. Types<br />
6 and 7 conta<strong>in</strong>ed 13c; the <strong>in</strong>tensity of 13c was the same as<br />
13b <strong>in</strong> type 7, but was th<strong>in</strong>ner than 13a and 13b <strong>in</strong> type 6. Type<br />
194 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
K 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 I<br />
a b c d<br />
kDa<br />
57<br />
40<br />
26<br />
20<br />
16<br />
13<br />
α-1<br />
α-2<br />
α-3<br />
α-4<br />
13a<br />
13b<br />
kDa<br />
57<br />
40<br />
26<br />
20<br />
α-1<br />
α-2<br />
α-3<br />
α-4<br />
Fig. 1. Variations for glutel<strong>in</strong> α subunit <strong>in</strong> Bangladeshi rice cultivars.<br />
K = K<strong>in</strong>maze, 1 = type 1, 2 = type 2, 3 = type 3, 4 = type<br />
4, 5 = type 5, 6 = type 6, 7 = type 7, I = IR36.<br />
16<br />
13<br />
13a<br />
13b<br />
8 had an extra band with a higher molecular size than 13a,<br />
<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g 13b-H/13a-L. The n<strong>in</strong>th type showed 13b and 13c<br />
and the extra band was the same as that of type 8. The number<br />
of varieties <strong>in</strong> each type was 209, 39, 111, 7, 53, 20, 15, 8, and<br />
5, respectively. In all seasons, type 1 showed the highest frequency,<br />
followed by type 2.<br />
Wide variation was observed <strong>in</strong> the polypeptide bands<br />
of storage prote<strong>in</strong>s of Bangladeshi rice cultivars. Bhowmik et<br />
al (1990) showed six types of variation <strong>in</strong> Bangladeshi rice<br />
varieties consider<strong>in</strong>g glutel<strong>in</strong> and prolam<strong>in</strong> together. Satoh et<br />
al (1990a,b) also reported SDS-PAGE variation <strong>in</strong> seed storage<br />
prote<strong>in</strong>s of African cultivated rice. Kumamaru et al (1988)<br />
reported four types of mutants for storage prote<strong>in</strong> of rice endosperm,<br />
and described the mutants as possible breed<strong>in</strong>g material<br />
for rice improvement and for genetic and biochemical<br />
studies of rice prote<strong>in</strong>. The variations recorded <strong>in</strong> SDS-PAGE<br />
analysis may be useful for further genetic and biochemical<br />
analysis and improvement of rice prote<strong>in</strong>, although the details<br />
are still under <strong>in</strong>vestigation.<br />
References<br />
Bhowmik A, Omura T, Kumamaru T. 1990. Screen<strong>in</strong>g of rice varieties<br />
for endosperm storage prote<strong>in</strong>s. Plant Breed. 105:101-105.<br />
Kumamaru T, Satoh H, Iwata N, Omura T, Ogawa M, Tanaka K.<br />
1988. Mutants of rice storage prote<strong>in</strong>s. 1. Screen<strong>in</strong>g of mutants<br />
for rice storage prote<strong>in</strong>s of prote<strong>in</strong> bodies <strong>in</strong> the starchy<br />
endosperm. Theor. Appl. Genet. 76:11-16.<br />
M<strong>in</strong>akuchi S, Satoh H, Konishi T. 1994. Polymorphism of prolam<strong>in</strong><br />
polypeptides <strong>in</strong> rice cultivars from Bangladesh, Nepal and<br />
Bhutan, a prelim<strong>in</strong>ary study. <strong>Rice</strong> Genet. Newsl. 11:175-176.<br />
Satoh H, Ronald RX, Katayama TC. 1990a. SDS-PAGE analysis of<br />
storage prote<strong>in</strong>s of cultivated rice collected <strong>in</strong> Madagascar,<br />
1988. Kagoshima University Research Center for the South<br />
Pacific, Occasional papers no. 18:101-113.<br />
Satoh H, Ch<strong>in</strong>g‘ang‘a HM, Ilaila D, Katayama TC. 1990b. SDS-<br />
PAGE analysis of storage prote<strong>in</strong>s of cultivated rice collected<br />
<strong>in</strong> Tanzania, 1988. Kagoshima University Research Center for<br />
the South Pacific, Occasional papers no. 18:114-126.<br />
kDa<br />
57<br />
40<br />
26<br />
20<br />
16<br />
13<br />
Fig. 3. Variations for prolam<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> Bangladeshi rice cultivars. K =<br />
K<strong>in</strong>maze, 1 = type 1, 2 = type 2, 3 = type 3, 4 = type 4, 5 = type<br />
5, 6 = type 6, 7 = type 7, 8 = type 8, 9 = type 9, I = IR36.<br />
Uemura YJ, Satoh H, Ogawa M, Suehisa H, Katayama TC, Yoshimura<br />
A. 1996. Chromosomal location of genes encod<strong>in</strong>g glutel<strong>in</strong><br />
polypeptides <strong>in</strong> rice. In: Khush GS, editor. <strong>Rice</strong> genetics III.<br />
Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs of the Third <strong>International</strong> <strong>Rice</strong> <strong>Genetics</strong> Symposium,<br />
16-20 Oct. 1995, Los Baños, Philipp<strong>in</strong>es. Manila (Philipp<strong>in</strong>es):<br />
<strong>International</strong> <strong>Rice</strong> Research Institute. p 471-476.<br />
Notes<br />
Fig. 2. Variations for glutel<strong>in</strong> α-4 band <strong>in</strong><br />
Bangladeshi rice varieties. a = K<strong>in</strong>maze, b<br />
= α-4 slow-migration type, c = α-4 fast-migration<br />
type, d = IR36.<br />
K 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I<br />
13a<br />
13b<br />
Authors’ addresses: M.S. Jahan, T. Kumamaru, H. Satoh, Laboratory<br />
of Plant Genetic Resources, Faculty of Agriculture,<br />
Kyushu University, Hakozaki, Fukuoka 812, Japan; A. Hamid,<br />
Department of Agronomy, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur<br />
Rahman Agricultural University, Salna, Gazipur 1703,<br />
Bangladesh.<br />
Genetic diversity, evolution, and alien <strong>in</strong>trogression 195
Genetic variation <strong>in</strong> storage prote<strong>in</strong> and storage endosperm<br />
starch <strong>in</strong> local rice cultivars of Myanmar<br />
P.P. Aung, T. Kumamaru, and H. Satoh<br />
Electrophoretically detected variation <strong>in</strong> seed storage prote<strong>in</strong> (glutel<strong>in</strong>, prolam<strong>in</strong>) and waxy prote<strong>in</strong> was analyzed among 150<br />
local rice cultivars collected from six dist<strong>in</strong>ct regions of Myanmar. The variation <strong>in</strong> storage endosperm starch was found by the<br />
alkali digestibility test. Variation <strong>in</strong> seed storage prote<strong>in</strong> and endosperm starch led to the characterization of two varietal types<br />
for glutel<strong>in</strong>, five varietal types for prolam<strong>in</strong>, and three varietal types for waxy prote<strong>in</strong> and alkali digestibility score. The prote<strong>in</strong><br />
profiles and alkali spread<strong>in</strong>g score were compared with those of standard varieties, us<strong>in</strong>g K<strong>in</strong>maze and IR36 as controls.<br />
Seventy-n<strong>in</strong>e percent of the local rice cultivars <strong>in</strong> Myanmar belonged to the IR36-type group and 0.7% of the cultivars were of<br />
the K<strong>in</strong>maze type. Four other types were differentiated by isoelectric focus<strong>in</strong>g analysis from both K<strong>in</strong>maze and IR36 types.<br />
Genetic variation <strong>in</strong> seed storage prote<strong>in</strong> and storage endosperm<br />
starch is important <strong>in</strong> genetic and breed<strong>in</strong>g research. Prote<strong>in</strong> is<br />
important for people whose ma<strong>in</strong> staple food is rice. Endosperm<br />
starch is one of the characters that determ<strong>in</strong>e cook<strong>in</strong>g quality.<br />
Bhowmik et al (1990) reported genetic variation <strong>in</strong> seed storage<br />
prote<strong>in</strong> of rice collected from Bangladesh. Genetic variation<br />
<strong>in</strong> seed storage prote<strong>in</strong> and endosperm starch among local<br />
rice cultivars of Myanmar has not been studied. We therefore<br />
<strong>in</strong>vestigated the genetic variation <strong>in</strong> these traits to improve rice<br />
quality through breed<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
Materials and methods<br />
One hundred and fifty local rice cultivars were collected from<br />
six dist<strong>in</strong>ct regions <strong>in</strong> Myanmar: 79 from the delta area, 27<br />
from the central dry zone, 22 from the northern mounta<strong>in</strong> region,<br />
19 from the coastal strip of Yakh<strong>in</strong>e State and Than<strong>in</strong>thayi<br />
Division, 2 from the eastern mounta<strong>in</strong> region, and 1 from the<br />
western mounta<strong>in</strong> region. The total storage prote<strong>in</strong> of rice endosperm<br />
was analyzed by sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide<br />
gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE). The glutel<strong>in</strong> extracted<br />
from develop<strong>in</strong>g seeds was analyzed by isoelectric focus<strong>in</strong>g<br />
(IEF). <strong>Rice</strong> cultivars K<strong>in</strong>maze (japonica) and IR36 (<strong>in</strong>dica)<br />
were used as controls.<br />
The starch characteristic was estimated by alkali digestibility<br />
score, which is also a good <strong>in</strong>dicator of cook<strong>in</strong>g quality<br />
because of its close l<strong>in</strong>kage with the gelat<strong>in</strong>ization temperature<br />
of starch. The rice kernels were immersed <strong>in</strong> 1.7% KOH<br />
for 24 h, and alkali spread<strong>in</strong>g score was evaluated with a descriptive<br />
scale (Little et al 1958).<br />
Results and discussion<br />
Glutel<strong>in</strong> consists of α and β subunits, which were separated<br />
<strong>in</strong>to α-1, α-2, α-3, α-4, and β-1, β-2, and β-3 (Uemura et al<br />
1996). Two types of variation <strong>in</strong> the glutel<strong>in</strong> subunit were detected<br />
<strong>in</strong> the rice cultivars (Fig. 1). Type A was characterized<br />
by faster migration of the α-3 band compared with K<strong>in</strong>maze<br />
and a wider gap between α-2 and α-3. Type B showed a slow<br />
migration of α-3, similar to that of IR36, with respective frequencies<br />
be<strong>in</strong>g 43% and 57%.<br />
The band<strong>in</strong>g patterns by SDS-PAGE analysis cannot fully<br />
expla<strong>in</strong> the prospects of gene cod<strong>in</strong>g for the glutel<strong>in</strong> molecule<br />
because each SDS-PAGE band consists of more than two IEF<br />
bands. IEF analysis showed that K<strong>in</strong>maze had up to 12 and 8<br />
bands for glutel<strong>in</strong> α and β subunits, respectively (Fig. 2). The<br />
variation <strong>in</strong> IEF band<strong>in</strong>g patterns was compared with standard<br />
varieties. In Figure 2, glutel<strong>in</strong> α-subunit bands were numbered<br />
from 1 to 12 and β-subunit bands were labeled from A to I.<br />
In K<strong>in</strong>maze, bands 1, 5, A, and B were present, but bands<br />
3 and 6 were absent <strong>in</strong> comparison with IR36. Type A was<br />
classified <strong>in</strong>to two types (lane 1, 2). Type 1 was the same as <strong>in</strong><br />
K<strong>in</strong>maze (lane 1), and type 2 had an extra band <strong>in</strong> the acidic<br />
position; the other bands were the same as <strong>in</strong> K<strong>in</strong>maze (lane<br />
2). Type B was classified <strong>in</strong>to four types—3, 4, 5, and 6. Type<br />
3 was the same as <strong>in</strong> IR36 (lane 3). Type 4 showed bands 1<br />
and 6, but bands 2, A, and B were not found (lane 4). In type 5,<br />
bands 5 and 6 were present (lane 5). Type B cultivars were the<br />
same as IR36; however, some variation was found <strong>in</strong> the site<br />
of the glutel<strong>in</strong> β subunit. Bands A and B of the glutel<strong>in</strong> β subunit<br />
were found <strong>in</strong> K<strong>in</strong>maze but not <strong>in</strong> IR36. However, these<br />
bands were also found <strong>in</strong> type 6, and the other bands of type 6<br />
were the same as <strong>in</strong> IR36 (lane 6). The frequency of types 1 to<br />
6 were 0.7%, 0.7%, 79.0%, 0.6%, 2.0%, and 17.0% of total<br />
cultivars, respectively. The results <strong>in</strong>dicated that types 4, 5,<br />
and 6 found <strong>in</strong> Myanmar cultivars (but different from K<strong>in</strong>maze<br />
and IR36) may be recomb<strong>in</strong>ant between <strong>in</strong>dica and japonica<br />
types.<br />
For prolam<strong>in</strong>, <strong>in</strong> terms of <strong>in</strong>tensity of 13a and 13b <strong>in</strong><br />
SDS-PAGE profiles, there were five types: type A had high<br />
<strong>in</strong>tensity of both 13a and 13b bands, type B had high <strong>in</strong>tensity<br />
of only 13b, type C possessed only high <strong>in</strong>tensity of 13a, type<br />
D showed low <strong>in</strong>tensity at both these bands, and type E had no<br />
13b band. Their frequencies were 18%, 9%, 29%, 24%, and<br />
20% of total cultivars, respectively.<br />
196 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
kDa<br />
60<br />
57<br />
K<strong>in</strong>maze 1 2 IR36<br />
–<br />
K<strong>in</strong>maze IR36 1 2 3 4 5 6<br />
B<br />
A<br />
B<br />
A<br />
B<br />
A<br />
B<br />
A<br />
I<br />
H<br />
G<br />
F<br />
E<br />
D<br />
C<br />
B<br />
A<br />
Glutel<strong>in</strong><br />
β subunit<br />
40<br />
20<br />
13<br />
α-1<br />
α-2<br />
α-3<br />
α-4<br />
β-1<br />
β-2<br />
β-3<br />
Glutel<strong>in</strong><br />
α subunit<br />
Glutel<strong>in</strong><br />
β subunit<br />
13a<br />
13b Prolam<strong>in</strong><br />
Fig. 1. Variation <strong>in</strong> glutel<strong>in</strong> subunits <strong>in</strong> Myanmar rice<br />
cultivars by SDS-PAGE analysis. Lane 1 = type A, lane<br />
2 = type B.<br />
+<br />
IEF<br />
6<br />
5<br />
3<br />
1<br />
6 6<br />
5<br />
1<br />
Fig. 2. Variation <strong>in</strong> glutel<strong>in</strong> detected by IEF analysis <strong>in</strong> Myanmar rice cultivars.<br />
Lane 1 = type 1, lane 2 = type 2 (arrow <strong>in</strong>dicates extra band <strong>in</strong> acidic position),<br />
lane 3 = type 3, lane 4 = type 4, lane 5 = type 5, lane 6 = type 6. (Arrowhead<br />
<strong>in</strong>dicates specific band of K<strong>in</strong>maze and IR36.)<br />
6<br />
12<br />
11<br />
10<br />
9<br />
8<br />
7<br />
6<br />
5<br />
4<br />
3<br />
2<br />
1<br />
Glutel<strong>in</strong><br />
α subunit<br />
Table 1. Variation <strong>in</strong> alkali spread<strong>in</strong>g score of 150 Myanmar rice cultivars.<br />
Alkali<br />
digestibility<br />
Variation <strong>in</strong> alkali digestibility score among varieties<br />
collected from different regions b<br />
score a WMR NMR EMR DA CSR CDZ Total<br />
Low<br />
1 0 5 1 23 1 4 34<br />
2 0 4 0 14 4 5 27<br />
3 0 3 1 18 5 6 33<br />
Intermediate<br />
4 0 5 0 16 4 5 30<br />
5 0 4 0 4 3 4 15<br />
6 1 1 0 3 1 2 8<br />
High<br />
7 0 0 0 1 1 1 3<br />
8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0<br />
9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0<br />
a Score 1 to 3 (frequency 62.7%), score 4 to 6 (frequency 35.3%), score 7 to 9 (frequency 2.0%). b WMR<br />
= western mounta<strong>in</strong> region, NMR = northern mounta<strong>in</strong> region, EMR = eastern mounta<strong>in</strong> region, DA =<br />
delta area, CSR = coastal strip region, CDZ = central dry zone.<br />
Genetic variation <strong>in</strong> storage endosperm starch<br />
Granule-bound starch synthase is known as waxy prote<strong>in</strong> with<br />
60 kDa. The enzyme is <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> amylose synthesis and waxy<br />
prote<strong>in</strong> is directly related to amylose content (Villareal and<br />
Juliano 1989). The Myanmar cultivars were classified <strong>in</strong>to three<br />
expression types of 60-kDa prote<strong>in</strong> based on their <strong>in</strong>tensity—<br />
high, low, and absent. The relative frequencies were 79%, 16%,<br />
and 5%, respectively. Myanmar rice cultivars showed a high<br />
<strong>in</strong>tensity of 60 kDa, just like IR36.<br />
The 94 Myanmar cultivars possessed low alkali digestibility<br />
with scores from 1 to 3, whereas 53 cultivars showed<br />
<strong>in</strong>termediate alkali digestibility with scores from 4 to 6. Three<br />
cultivars had high alkali digestibility with scores from 7 to 9.<br />
The Myanmar cultivars are generally more resistant and not<br />
affected much by alkali compared with K<strong>in</strong>maze (Table 1).<br />
The results showed Myanmar’s diverse rice genetic resources<br />
for seed storage prote<strong>in</strong> and endosperm starch. This<br />
<strong>in</strong>formation will be valuable <strong>in</strong> rice breed<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
Genetic diversity, evolution, and alien <strong>in</strong>trogression 197
References<br />
Bhowmik A, Omura T, Kumamaru T. 1990. Screen<strong>in</strong>g of rice varieties<br />
for endosperm storage prote<strong>in</strong>. Plant Breed. 105:101-105.<br />
Little RR, Hider BG, Dawson EH. 1958. Differential effect on dilute<br />
alkali on 25 varieties of milled white rice. Cereal Chem.<br />
35:111-126.<br />
Uemura YJ, Satoh H, Ogawa M, Suehisa H, Katayama TC, Yoshimura<br />
A. 1996. Chromosomal location of genes encod<strong>in</strong>g glutel<strong>in</strong><br />
polypeptides <strong>in</strong> rice. In: Khush GS, editor. <strong>Rice</strong> genetics III.<br />
Manila (Philipp<strong>in</strong>es): <strong>International</strong> <strong>Rice</strong> Research Institute.<br />
p 471-476.<br />
Villareal CP, Juliano BO. 1989. Comparative levels of waxy gene<br />
product of endosperm starch granules of different rice<br />
ecotypes. Starch/Starke 41:369-371.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ address: Faculty of Agriculture, Kyushu University,<br />
Hakozaki, Fukuoka 812, Japan.<br />
Variation <strong>in</strong> seed storage prote<strong>in</strong>s of Pakistani<br />
rice germplasm<br />
S.U. Siddiqui, H. Satoh, and T. Kumamaru<br />
<strong>Rice</strong>, the second most important crop <strong>in</strong> Pakistan, was <strong>in</strong>vestigated for endosperm storage prote<strong>in</strong>s. Four hundred seventy-five<br />
accessions, obta<strong>in</strong>ed from the M<strong>in</strong>istry of Agriculture, Fisheries, and Forestry (MAFF) genebank of Japan, underwent SDS-<br />
PAGE and IEF analyses. A wide variation was found <strong>in</strong> local rice cultivars of Pakistan for the two major storage prote<strong>in</strong>s, glutel<strong>in</strong><br />
and prolam<strong>in</strong>. Prolam<strong>in</strong>s showed four types of variation by SDS-PAGE, whereas glutel<strong>in</strong> revealed six types of variation. For<br />
proglutel<strong>in</strong> (57-kDa polypeptide), two types of variation were recorded <strong>in</strong> comparison with IR36 and Taichung 65. Some 90.5%<br />
of high 57-kDa polypeptide (57H) spontaneous mutants were distributed <strong>in</strong> low-altitude areas of the Punjab region. The IEF<br />
analysis of extracted glutel<strong>in</strong> also showed variation based on the <strong>in</strong>tensity and presence or absence of the respective bands.<br />
The 57H mutation (controlled by a s<strong>in</strong>gle recessive gene, i.e., glup3 gene) was found to be located between RFLP markers<br />
C1238 and R2370 with<strong>in</strong> a 5.3-cM distance on chromosome 4. The observed variation for low prolam<strong>in</strong> and the glutel<strong>in</strong><br />
variation may be useful <strong>in</strong> improv<strong>in</strong>g the nutritional value of rice.<br />
Pakistani rice germplasm is quite diverse <strong>in</strong> terms of qualitative<br />
and quantitative traits (PGRI 1995). <strong>Rice</strong> research <strong>in</strong> Pakistan<br />
ma<strong>in</strong>ly focused on <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g rice yield, while lack<strong>in</strong>g<br />
studies on gra<strong>in</strong> prote<strong>in</strong> quality. In this report, we describe the<br />
diversity observed <strong>in</strong> Pakistani local rice genetic resources for<br />
storage prote<strong>in</strong>s to focus on materials that can be used to enhance<br />
gra<strong>in</strong> quality <strong>in</strong> terms of storage prote<strong>in</strong>s. Four hundred<br />
and seventy-five accessions of Pakistani local rice genetic resources<br />
obta<strong>in</strong>ed from the M<strong>in</strong>istry of Agriculture, Fisheries,<br />
and Forestry (MAFF) genebank of Japan were used as materials.<br />
The endosperm storage prote<strong>in</strong>s of the accessions were<br />
analyzed by SDS-PAGE and IEF. <strong>Rice</strong> storage prote<strong>in</strong>s are<br />
composed of glutel<strong>in</strong> and prolam<strong>in</strong>. A major component of<br />
prolam<strong>in</strong> is a 13-kDa polypeptide, which consists of 13a and<br />
13b (Ogawa et al 1987). <strong>Rice</strong> glutel<strong>in</strong> consists of α and β subunits<br />
composed of four and three bands, respectively (Uemura<br />
et al 1996).<br />
Figure 1 shows the prolam<strong>in</strong> variation: 16% of the total<br />
accessions showed low levels of 13b (lane 1), whereas the presence<br />
of the <strong>in</strong>termediate band between 13a and 13b, that is,<br />
13c (not found <strong>in</strong> IR36 or T65), was observed <strong>in</strong> 1% of the<br />
accessions (lane 2). Most of the cultivars (80%) had both bands<br />
(13a and 13b) of equally high <strong>in</strong>tensity (lane 3) and 3% of the<br />
accessions had a low level of both 13-kDa polypeptides (lane<br />
4). Bhowmik et al (1990) also reported that native rice varieties<br />
of Bangladesh had a low <strong>in</strong>tensity of 13a and 13b.<br />
M<strong>in</strong>akuchi et al (1994) also reported the occurrence of three<br />
bands (13a, 13b, and 13c) on prolam<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice germplasm from<br />
Bangladesh, Bhutan, and Nepal.<br />
Pakistani varieties revealed six types of variation for the<br />
glutel<strong>in</strong> subunit. Figure 2A shows the variation for the α-3<br />
band, that is, the fast-migration α-3 band type (lane 1), slowmigration<br />
α-3 band type (lane 2), α-3 band hav<strong>in</strong>g both fast<br />
and slow migration band types (lane 3), and α-3 band deletion<br />
type (lane 4). Their frequencies were 70%, 11%, 2%, and 0.4%,<br />
respectively. Figure 2B shows the variation for the α-4 band,<br />
for which fast (lane 1) and slow (lane 2) migration types were<br />
recorded. Their respective frequencies were 2% and 80% for<br />
the total germplasm.<br />
For the variation <strong>in</strong> the 57-kDa glutel<strong>in</strong> precursor, enriched<br />
glutel<strong>in</strong> precursor (57H) cultivars were observed (Fig.<br />
2C). The frequency of 57H was 18% of the total germplasm.<br />
Satoh et al (1995) reported that 1.4% of the accessions from<br />
North Asian countries showed 57H variation. Of these, 98%<br />
were distributed <strong>in</strong> low-altitude areas, whereas the highest frequency<br />
of occurrence was <strong>in</strong> the Punjab region (90.5%). The<br />
198 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
1 2 3 4 5<br />
A B C<br />
1 2 3 4 5 1 2 1 2<br />
α-1<br />
α-2<br />
α-3<br />
α-4<br />
57<br />
kDa<br />
α-4<br />
13a<br />
13c<br />
13b<br />
Fig. 1. SDS-PAGE band<strong>in</strong>g pattern for total endosperm<br />
prote<strong>in</strong> show<strong>in</strong>g variation <strong>in</strong> prolam<strong>in</strong><br />
bands. Lane 1 = low-<strong>in</strong>tensity band of 13b; lane<br />
2 = extra band, i.e., 13c <strong>in</strong>dicated by the arrowhead;<br />
lane 3 = equally high <strong>in</strong>tensity of 13a and<br />
13b; lane 4 = low <strong>in</strong>tensity of 13a and 13b; lane<br />
5 = IR36.<br />
Fig. 2. SDS-PAGE analyses of total endosperm prote<strong>in</strong> show<strong>in</strong>g variation of<br />
glutel<strong>in</strong> fraction. (A) Variation of α-3 band. Lane 1 = fast-migration α-3 band,<br />
lane 2 = slow migration, lane 3 = slow- and fast-migration type, lane 4 =<br />
deletion of α-3 band, lane 5 = IR36. (B) Variation of α-4 band. Lane 1 = slowmigration<br />
α-4 band, lane 2 = fast-migration α-4 bands. (C) Variation of 57-<br />
kDa glutel<strong>in</strong> precursor. Lane 1 = 57H (57 kDa high), lane 2 = normal <strong>in</strong>tensity<br />
of 57 kDa.<br />
Glutel<strong>in</strong><br />
basic<br />
subunit<br />
Glutel<strong>in</strong><br />
acidic<br />
subunit<br />
+<br />
Fig. 3. IEF band<strong>in</strong>g pattern of glutel<strong>in</strong> polypeptides show<strong>in</strong>g variation<br />
<strong>in</strong> Pakistani cultivars. Lane 1 = Pakistani cultivar with the<br />
same band pattern as IR36, lane 2 = recomb<strong>in</strong>ant type with band<br />
6, A and B. Glutel<strong>in</strong> acidic subunit = glutel<strong>in</strong> α subunit, glutel<strong>in</strong><br />
basic subunit = glutel<strong>in</strong> β subunit.<br />
distribution pattern of 57H variation showed a high degree of<br />
correlation <strong>in</strong> terms of altitud<strong>in</strong>al and geographic occurrence.<br />
Similarly, Katsuta et al (1996) reported that Pakistani rice<br />
germplasm has a dist<strong>in</strong>ctive correlation with geographic distribution<br />
<strong>in</strong> terms of altitude for esterase 3 enzyme. To <strong>in</strong>vestigate<br />
the genetic behavior of the Pakistani 57H variation and<br />
its relationship with the registered 57H gene, genetic analysis<br />
was performed. In a cross with normal types, the segregation<br />
of the normal and 57H types <strong>in</strong> the F 2 showed that the 57H<br />
variation was controlled by a s<strong>in</strong>gle recessive gene. From the<br />
results of the cross with the registered 57H gene, it was clear<br />
that the Pakistani 57H variation was allelic with the glup3 gene.<br />
The glup3 was located with<strong>in</strong> 5.3 cM between RFLP markers<br />
C1238 and R2370 on chromosome 4.<br />
The classified variation by SDS-PAGE was analyzed by<br />
IEF for extracted glutel<strong>in</strong>. Glutel<strong>in</strong> was separated <strong>in</strong>to α and β<br />
subunits consist<strong>in</strong>g of 12 and 10 bands, respectively. Uemura<br />
et al (1996) reported that glutel<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> both japonica cultivar<br />
K<strong>in</strong>maze and <strong>in</strong>dica cultivar IR36 possesses four unique IEF<br />
bands. Taichung 65 showed the same pattern as K<strong>in</strong>maze. When<br />
the IEF pattern of T65 and IR36 was compared, T65 specifically<br />
had bands A and B <strong>in</strong> the β subunit and bands 1 and 11 <strong>in</strong><br />
the α subunit, not found <strong>in</strong> IR36. Instead, IR36 specifically<br />
had bands C and E <strong>in</strong> the β subunit and bands 3 and 6 <strong>in</strong> the α<br />
subunit, which were not found <strong>in</strong> K<strong>in</strong>maze. Pakistani rice cultivars<br />
showed both T65 and IR36 types, whereas, <strong>in</strong> the types<br />
with band 6, A and B (Fig. 3, lane 2) showed possible recomb<strong>in</strong>ation<br />
between T65 and IR36.<br />
Our f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs confirmed the existence of great diversity<br />
<strong>in</strong> seed storage prote<strong>in</strong> that could be used to improve prote<strong>in</strong><br />
quality and may serve as a model for <strong>in</strong>heritance. Also, the<br />
correlation that exists between variation and geographic distribution<br />
may be used to evaluate environmental <strong>in</strong>teraction<br />
on QTLs.<br />
References<br />
–<br />
IR36 1 2 T65<br />
Bhowmik A, Omura T, Kumamaru T. 1990. Screen<strong>in</strong>g of rice varieties<br />
for endosperm storage prote<strong>in</strong>s. Plant Breed. 105:101-105.<br />
Katsuta M, Okuno K, Afzal M, Anwar R. 1996. Genetic differentiation<br />
of rice germplasm collected <strong>in</strong> Northern Pakistan. JARQ<br />
30(2):61-67.<br />
B<br />
A<br />
6<br />
K<strong>in</strong>maze<br />
specific<br />
IR36<br />
specific<br />
Genetic diversity, evolution, and alien <strong>in</strong>trogression 199
M<strong>in</strong>akuchi S, Satoh H, Konishi T. 1994. Polymorphism of prolam<strong>in</strong><br />
polypeptides <strong>in</strong> rice cultivars from Bangladesh, Nepal and<br />
Bhutan, a prelim<strong>in</strong>ary study. <strong>Rice</strong> Genet. Newsl. 11:175-176.<br />
Ogawa M, Kumamaru T, Satoh H, Iwata N, Omura Y, Kasai Z, Tanaka<br />
K. 1987. Purification of prote<strong>in</strong> body I of rice seed and its<br />
polypeptide composition. Plant Cell Physiol. 28:1517-1527.<br />
PGRI (Plant Genetic Resources Institute). 1995. Annual report 1995.<br />
Islamabad (Pakistan): National Agricultural Research Centre,<br />
PGRI. 104 p.<br />
Satoh H, Kumamaru T, Ogawa M, Siraishi M, Gi Im B, Son MY,<br />
Takemoto Y. 1995. Spontaneous mutants <strong>in</strong> rice. <strong>Rice</strong> Genet.<br />
Newsl. 12:194-196.<br />
Uemura YJ, Satoh H, Ogawa M, Suehisa H, Katayama TC, Yoshimura<br />
A. 1996. Chromosomal location of genes encod<strong>in</strong>g glutel<strong>in</strong><br />
polypeptides <strong>in</strong> rice. In: Khush GS, editor. <strong>Rice</strong> genetics III.<br />
Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs of the Third <strong>International</strong> <strong>Rice</strong> <strong>Genetics</strong> Symposium,<br />
16-20 Oct. 1995, Los Baños, Philipp<strong>in</strong>es. Manila (Philipp<strong>in</strong>es):<br />
<strong>International</strong> <strong>Rice</strong> Research Institute. p 471-476.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ address: Laboratory of Plant Genetic Resources, Faculty<br />
of Agriculture, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.<br />
Genetic diversity <strong>in</strong> ra<strong>in</strong>fed lowland rice genotypes<br />
as detected by RAPD primers<br />
S. S<strong>in</strong>gh, S. Sarkarung, R.K. S<strong>in</strong>gh, O.N. S<strong>in</strong>gh, A.K. S<strong>in</strong>gh, V.P. S<strong>in</strong>gh, H.S. Bhandari, W. Xu, and Z. Li<br />
The objective was to determ<strong>in</strong>e the genetic diversity among 21 ra<strong>in</strong>fed lowland rice genotypes. The genotypes <strong>in</strong>cluded both<br />
landraces and improved cultivars, and were evaluated for important morphological characters and 47 RAPD markers. The<br />
difference between genotypic and phenotypic coefficients of variation was relatively low for all the characters except gra<strong>in</strong> yield<br />
for both normal and delayed plant<strong>in</strong>g. A RAPD assay for 47 random primers revealed a total of 275 alleles, 91% of which were<br />
polymorphic. The number of alleles detected by primers ranged from 1 to 17, with an average of 5.8, whereas gene frequencies<br />
ranged from 0.14 to 0.96, except for AA09, AC02, AB17, HI46, and F19. Gene diversity was high (0.53 to 0.85). The<br />
dendrogram generated from the RAPD assay revealed five dist<strong>in</strong>ct clusters of genotypes represent<strong>in</strong>g different responses to<br />
drought and delayed plant<strong>in</strong>g. Genotypes <strong>in</strong> group 1 <strong>in</strong>cluded IR66363-8M-1-1-1, RAU 83-85, SBR 3025, TTB 308-51, and<br />
CN 1035-60, which were less sensitive to delayed plant<strong>in</strong>g, but sensitive to drought. Group 2 comprised PSR119, IR67495-<br />
M-2-1-1-1, and KMJ 19, which showed sensitivity to delayed plant<strong>in</strong>g only when exposed to drought. Genotypes identified <strong>in</strong><br />
group 3 (Sabita, Madhukar, IR67471-M-8-1-1-1, IR66876-11-M-1-1-1, IR66366-M-7-1-1-1, CR 333-10, and Jal-Lahari)<br />
were less sensitive to both delayed plant<strong>in</strong>g and drought. Rajshree and Mashuree of group 4 were sensitive to both drought and<br />
delayed plant<strong>in</strong>g, while group 5, which <strong>in</strong>cluded TTB 308-87, IR67440-M-2-1-1-1, KMJ17, and RAU 79-22, was less sensitive<br />
to drought as well as delayed plant<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
Ra<strong>in</strong>fed lowlands account for 17 million ha of rice area <strong>in</strong> India,<br />
ma<strong>in</strong>ly concentrated <strong>in</strong> eastern India. Because of uncerta<strong>in</strong><br />
ra<strong>in</strong>fall, early drought and flood are common <strong>in</strong> ra<strong>in</strong>fed<br />
lowland areas, which forces farmers to transplant the rice crop<br />
late us<strong>in</strong>g older seedl<strong>in</strong>gs. Delayed plant<strong>in</strong>g is thus a major<br />
cause for low yield, less than 2 t ha –1 , <strong>in</strong> this ecosystem. Estimation<br />
of gene diversity is an important step <strong>in</strong> breed<strong>in</strong>g programs.<br />
Genetic markers such as restriction fragment length<br />
polymorphism (RFLP), random amplified polymorphic DNA<br />
(RAPD), etc., represent genetic variation at the DNA level,<br />
without be<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>fluenced by environmental variation. This<br />
paper analyzes the data collected from 16 advanced breed<strong>in</strong>g<br />
l<strong>in</strong>es and five checks, us<strong>in</strong>g RAPD markers. The ma<strong>in</strong> objective<br />
of the study was to assess the genetic diversity among<br />
improved breed<strong>in</strong>g l<strong>in</strong>es vis-à-vis local varieties for their responses<br />
to delayed plant<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
Materials and methods<br />
Field experiments were conducted dur<strong>in</strong>g the ra<strong>in</strong>y season at<br />
CRS, Masodha, with 16 genotypes and five checks. The experimental<br />
design used was a randomized complete block (three<br />
replications) with a split-plot arrangement of treatments: plant<strong>in</strong>g<br />
date as the ma<strong>in</strong> plots and the genotypes as subplots. Observations<br />
on 10 morphophysiological characters were taken<br />
from five sample hills <strong>in</strong> each subplot. Data recorded were<br />
days to 50% flower<strong>in</strong>g, plant height (cm), ear-bear<strong>in</strong>g tillers<br />
m –2 (EBT), panicle length (cm), gra<strong>in</strong> yield plot –1 (converted<br />
to t ha –1 ), 1,000-seed weight, number of gra<strong>in</strong>s, sterility (%),<br />
total biomass (g), and harvest <strong>in</strong>dex (%).<br />
The DNA was extracted and purified follow<strong>in</strong>g the modified<br />
CTAB (cetyltrimethylammonium bromide) procedure.<br />
DNA amplification was performed <strong>in</strong> a 25-µL reaction volume<br />
conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g 10 mM Tris-CL (pH 8.3), 50 mM KCl, 2 mM<br />
MgCl 2 , 100 mM dNTP, 10 ng primer, 25 ng genomic DNA,<br />
and 2 units of Taq DNA polymerase, topped with 50 µL of<br />
m<strong>in</strong>eral oil. The thermal cycler (PCR mach<strong>in</strong>e, PTC-100 MJ<br />
Research) was programmed for 45 cycles of 1 m<strong>in</strong> at 94 °C<br />
and 2 m<strong>in</strong> at 72 °C. The amplified samples were stored at 4 °C<br />
until loaded on 1.5% agarose gels <strong>in</strong> 1X TBE buffer and visualized<br />
by ethidium bromide sta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g.<br />
200 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
Table 1. Total number of alleles, allele length <strong>in</strong> bp, gene frequency, and gene diversity of 47 RAPD<br />
markers assayed <strong>in</strong> 21 rice genotypes for delayed plant<strong>in</strong>g under ra<strong>in</strong>fed lowland conditions.<br />
M a TNA AL <strong>in</strong> (bp) GF GD M TNA AL <strong>in</strong> (bp) GE GD<br />
AA01 6 200–750 0.29 0.70 B02 5 420–1,300 0.24 0.74<br />
AA02 4 320–750 0.46 0.53 B03 4 320–650 0.25 0.72<br />
AA03 4 300–800 0.31 0.68 B04 5 220–900 0.27 0.67<br />
AA15 3 300–600 0.44 0.55 B18 4 300–800 0.32 0.67<br />
AA09 2 450–1,070 0.38 0.03 B19 4 420–850 0.37 0.62<br />
AB02 3 400–750 0.33 0.66 B20 8 250–600 0.23 0.76<br />
AB06 8 550–900 0.26 0.73 C-01 7 300–1,000 0.29 0.70<br />
AB11 3 405–750 0.38 0.61 C-08 7 350–900 0.18 0.81<br />
AB17 4 490–1,080 0.90 0.09 C-19 5 500–800 0.30 0.69<br />
AB19 6 520–750 0.29 0.70 E01 5 500–1,000 0.31 0.68<br />
AC02 3 300–1,000 0.96 0.03 E08 4 350–800 0.27 0.72<br />
AC10 3 250–480 0.38 0.61 E15 13 350–1,400 0.14 0.85<br />
AC14 4 320–420 0.15 0.85 F17 9 220–900 0.27 0.72<br />
AC15 7 520–1,300 0.29 0.70 F18 4 350–1,000 0.35 0.64<br />
AF15 2 300–1,000 0.71 0.28 F19 1 200–900 0.81 0.18<br />
AG10 10 410–1,200 0.17 0.82 G05 5 280–950 0.25 0.74<br />
AG13 9 240–410 0.24 0.75 G06 3 450–1,300 0.44 0.55<br />
AG16 6 355–1,000 0.22 0.77 H03 6 550–980 0.37 0.62<br />
AI-10 17 450–1,600 0.18 0.81 H146 1 380–1,050 0.90 0.09<br />
AL11 10 355–950 0.22 0.77 J16 9 390–450 0.14 0.85<br />
AL13 5 210–850 0.37 0.62 O-05 11 550–1,000 0.22 0.77<br />
AN06 6 380–950 0.25 0.74 O-06 5 440–950 0.26 0.73<br />
AN14 7 390–550 0.33 0.66 N08 8 400–900 0.20 0.79<br />
AN16 10 510–1,320 0.23 0.76<br />
a M = markers, AL = allele length <strong>in</strong> bp, GD = gene diversity, TNA = total number of alleles, GF = gene frequency.<br />
RAPD data were scored for computer analysis on the<br />
basis of presence and absence (scale 1 and 0 for each allele)<br />
and genetic distance was calculated for all 275 pairs of genotypes.<br />
Similarity coefficients were used to construct a dendrogram<br />
by UPGMA methods and NTSYS software (Rohlf 1992).<br />
The gene diversity (heterozygosity) was calculated accord<strong>in</strong>g<br />
to Weir (1990):<br />
Gene diversity = 1 – ΣP 2 ij<br />
where Pij is the frequency of the jth RAPD pattern for clone I<br />
and is summed across n patterns.<br />
The split-plot analysis was carried out and genotypic and<br />
phenotypic coefficients of variation and heritability (broadsense)<br />
were calculated by SAS PROC GLM (SAS Institute<br />
1985).<br />
Results and discussion<br />
Forty-seven primers were used for amplify<strong>in</strong>g DNA segments<br />
from the genomic DNA of 21 genotypes. For each primer evaluated,<br />
out of a total of 275 alleles, 91% showed polymorphism.<br />
The number of alleles per primer varied from 1 to 17 (Table<br />
1). On average, 5.8 alleles per locus were observed. Except<br />
for AA09, AC02, AB17, HI46, and F19, gene diversity recorded<br />
was high (0.53 to 0.85) and gene frequencies ranged<br />
from 0.14 to 0.96 (Table 1). AI10 primer produced more polymorphism<br />
(17 bands). The size of the amplified segment ranged<br />
from 200–750 bp for AA01 to 450–1,600 bp for AI10. Figure<br />
1 shows the amplification products with primer E15. A very<br />
clear band<strong>in</strong>g pattern of amplified segments ranged from 350<br />
to 1,400 bp. Amplified polymorphic DNA fragments were<br />
screened based on Jaccard’s similarity coefficient. Pair-wise<br />
similarity ranged from 0.06 to 0.84. The number of alleles<br />
detected by AG10, AI70, and E15 showed a high degree of<br />
polymorphism, with 10 to 17 alleles, gene frequency of 0.14<br />
to 0.18, and gene diversity of 0.81 to 0.85.<br />
Association among the 21 genotypes revealed by<br />
UPGMA cluster analysis is presented <strong>in</strong> Figure 2. The clusters<br />
were classified <strong>in</strong>to two ma<strong>in</strong> groups, cluster 1 of mediumduration<br />
varieties and cluster 2 of long-duration varieties. Although<br />
the group<strong>in</strong>g of varieties by Jaccard’s coefficient of<br />
similarity and cluster analysis based on RAPD data showed a<br />
high degree of similarity, only a few l<strong>in</strong>es showed different<br />
behavior. For example, part of the four l<strong>in</strong>es that showed high<br />
values of similarity coefficient, such as TTB 308, fall <strong>in</strong>to a<br />
completely different group show<strong>in</strong>g proximity with the group<br />
consist<strong>in</strong>g of Rajshree and Mahsuri. Similarly, PSR 1119-1-<br />
13-3 and IR67495 formed a separate group based on Jaccard’s<br />
method, while they were together <strong>in</strong> group 1 of the cluster analysis.<br />
Genetic diversity, evolution, and alien <strong>in</strong>trogression 201
kb 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1011 1213 141516 1718192021<br />
kb 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1011 1213 141516 1718192021<br />
Fig. 1. Polymorphic pattern detected <strong>in</strong><br />
various ra<strong>in</strong>fed lowland genotypes us<strong>in</strong>g<br />
RAPD. The genotypes were IR66876-11-<br />
M (lane 1), RAU83-82-1 (lane 2),<br />
SBR3025-2-B (lane 3), TTB308-50 (lane<br />
4), Sabita (lane 5), Jal-Lahari (lane 6),<br />
Madhukar (lane 7), IR66363-M-8 (lane 8),<br />
IR66366-M-7 (lane 9), IR67440-M-5 (lane<br />
10), CR333-10 (lane 11), CN1035-60<br />
(lane 12), RAU419-85 (lane 13),<br />
PSR1119-13 (lane 14), IR67471-M-8<br />
(lane 15), IR67495-M-2 (lane 16), KMJ-<br />
1-17-1 (lane 17), KMJ-1-19-1 (lane 18),<br />
RAU79-22 (lane 19), Rajshree (lane 20),<br />
and Mahsuri (lane 21). Amplification products<br />
obta<strong>in</strong>ed with primer AG10 (A) and<br />
AN16 (B).<br />
IR66876-11-M<br />
RAU83-85<br />
SBR3025-B<br />
RAU419-85<br />
CN1035-60<br />
PSR119-13-1<br />
IR67495-2-M<br />
KMJ1-19-1<br />
Sabita<br />
Madhukar<br />
IR67471-M-8<br />
IR66363-M-8<br />
IR66366-M-7<br />
RAU79-22-1<br />
Jal-Lahari<br />
Rajshree<br />
Mahsuri<br />
TTB308-51<br />
IR67440-M-5<br />
KMJ-1-17-1<br />
CR333-10<br />
0.84 0.65 0.46 0.28 0.09<br />
Coefficient of similarity<br />
Fig. 2. Dendrogram of ra<strong>in</strong>fed lowland<br />
genotypes planted under normal and<br />
delayed conditions, constructed us<strong>in</strong>g<br />
UPGMA based on Jaccard’s similarity<br />
coefficients.<br />
The coefficient of variation for different characters under<br />
normal and delayed conditions ranged from 4.5 to 40.4<br />
and 4.4 to 31.2, respectively, <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g a high degree of variability.<br />
The genetic coefficient of variability (GCV) ranged<br />
from 5.2% to 8.5% for days to 50% flower<strong>in</strong>g (DF) and 41.5%<br />
to 44.1% for gra<strong>in</strong> yield (GY) <strong>in</strong> normal and delayed plant<strong>in</strong>g,<br />
respectively. Number of gra<strong>in</strong>s (TGN), sterility, and total biomass<br />
(TB) also showed a comparatively high GCV <strong>in</strong> both<br />
plant<strong>in</strong>g conditions. The differences between GCV and PCA<br />
for all the characters except GY and harvest <strong>in</strong>dex (HI) under<br />
both plant<strong>in</strong>g conditions and panicle length under delayed<br />
plant<strong>in</strong>g conditions were low. Heritability estimates were high<br />
202 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
for traits such as DF, EBT, TW, TGN, sterility, and TB under<br />
both plant<strong>in</strong>g conditions. The estimates were higher for PH<br />
and GY (0.93 and 0.87) <strong>in</strong> normal versus delayed plant<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
Genetic advance was high for GY (79.5 for normal and 70.8<br />
for delayed plant<strong>in</strong>g) and TGN (42.4 for normal and 60.9 for<br />
delayed plant<strong>in</strong>g) compared with that for TW (34.2 for normal<br />
and 28.4 for delayed plant<strong>in</strong>g), HI (32.2 for normal and<br />
29.1 for delayed), PH (35.9 for normal and 26.5 for delayed),<br />
and EBT (26.8 for normal and 25.5 for delayed plant<strong>in</strong>g).<br />
References<br />
Rohlf FJ. 1992. NTSYS-pc: numerical taxonomy and multivariate<br />
analysis system. New York (USA): Exeter Software.<br />
SAS Institute. 1985. SAS users’ guide: statistics. Version 5 ed. Cary,<br />
N.C. (USA): SAS Institute.<br />
Weir BS. 1990. Genetic data analysis: methods for discrete population<br />
genetic data. Sunderland, Mass. (USA): S<strong>in</strong>auer Associates,<br />
Inc. Publishers.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ addresses: S. S<strong>in</strong>gh, S. Sarkarung, R.K. S<strong>in</strong>gh, V.P. S<strong>in</strong>gh,<br />
W. Xu, and Z. Li, <strong>International</strong> <strong>Rice</strong> Research Institute, Los<br />
Baños, Philipp<strong>in</strong>es; O.N. S<strong>in</strong>gh and A.K. S<strong>in</strong>gh, N.D. University<br />
of Agriculture and Technology, Kumarganj, Faizabad,<br />
Uttar Pradesh, India; H.S. Bhandari, Lumle Agricultural Research<br />
Centre, Phokhara, Kaski, Nepal.<br />
Marker-based estimation of coefficient of coancestry <strong>in</strong> rice<br />
D.A. Tabanao, L.S. Sebastian, A.L. Carpena, J.E. Hernandez, A.I.N. Gironella, and R.N. Bernardo<br />
The coefficient of coancestry was calculated us<strong>in</strong>g two methods based on DNA marker data. Microsatellite marker analysis of<br />
eight modern rice varieties and their 25 progenitors resulted <strong>in</strong> a total of 559 alleles from 119 loci. Marker estimates were<br />
computed for all 528 pairwise genotype comb<strong>in</strong>ations us<strong>in</strong>g the nonrelatives ( N<br />
f ij<br />
) and the tabular ( T<br />
f ij<br />
) methods. The mean<br />
values of N<br />
f ij<br />
, T<br />
f ij<br />
, and f ij<br />
were 0.1502, 0.0452, and 0.0649, respectively. T<br />
f ij<br />
and N<br />
f ij<br />
deviated by ≥0.10 from f ij<br />
<strong>in</strong> about the same<br />
number of genotype pairs, but T<br />
f ij<br />
correlated better to f ij<br />
than did N<br />
f ij<br />
. The two marker estimates themselves were highly correlated<br />
and deviated by ≥0.10 <strong>in</strong> only 44/258 genotype pairs. Also, the T<br />
f ij<br />
dendrogram agreed more closely with the f ij<br />
dendrogram<br />
than did the N<br />
f ij<br />
dendrogram, but both T<br />
f ij<br />
and N<br />
f ij<br />
were about as equally suitable as f ij<br />
to cluster analysis. The differences<br />
between pedigree and marker estimates were due to human selection and to the assumption that <strong>in</strong>itial progenitors were<br />
unrelated. The highly significant correlation of the marker estimates to f ij<br />
<strong>in</strong>dicated their validity as measures of genetic<br />
relatedness, while their immunity to assumptions of the pedigree method and their appropriateness to classification implied<br />
their superiority. T<br />
f ij<br />
is more accurate to use when pedigree <strong>in</strong>formation and DNA profiles are complete; otherwise, N<br />
f ij<br />
is more<br />
mean<strong>in</strong>gful to use.<br />
Measures of genetic relatedness are very important <strong>in</strong> plant<br />
breed<strong>in</strong>g-related activities and are needed <strong>in</strong> applications <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g<br />
varietal identification, <strong>in</strong>tellectual property protection,<br />
and utility patent<strong>in</strong>g (Smith 1997). The development of molecular<br />
markers has enabled plant breeders to determ<strong>in</strong>e the<br />
genetic relationships among plant germplasm at the level of<br />
the DNA itself. DNA-based markers have the advantage of<br />
be<strong>in</strong>g virtually unlimited <strong>in</strong> number and <strong>in</strong>dependent of environmental<br />
effects. The question then would be: Which similarity<br />
<strong>in</strong>dex is more accurate and mean<strong>in</strong>gful to use<br />
The coefficient of coancestry (f) is the most widely used<br />
and accepted measure of genetic relatedness <strong>in</strong> plant breed<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
However, its total dependence on the parentage <strong>in</strong>formation<br />
of the germplasm under comparison limits its use and accuracy<br />
because it doesn’t satisfy the assumptions. Bernardo<br />
(1993) proposed estimat<strong>in</strong>g the coefficient of coancestry by<br />
us<strong>in</strong>g DNA marker data based on the fact that DNA marker<br />
data are a direct sampl<strong>in</strong>g of the genome itself, and s<strong>in</strong>ce f is<br />
the probability that two alleles at the same locus are identical<br />
by descent (ibd). This marker-based approach would circumvent<br />
the problems associated with the classical pedigree-based<br />
approach. This study was conducted (1) to compute the coefficients<br />
of coancestry of selected rice germplasm us<strong>in</strong>g<br />
microsatellite DNA marker data and (2) to assess their validity<br />
relative to the pedigree-based method.<br />
The use of simple sequence repeats (SSRs), also known<br />
as microsatellites, is ga<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g wide acceptance <strong>in</strong> analyz<strong>in</strong>g genetic<br />
relationships because of their ability to detect large numbers<br />
of discrete alleles repeatedly, accurately, and efficiently.<br />
The genetic profiles produced by SSRs can be used <strong>in</strong> conjunction<br />
with pedigree and performance data to document<br />
ownership and protect <strong>in</strong>tellectual property rights (McCouch<br />
et al 1997). In DNA profiles, the proportion of alleles that are<br />
common between two genotypes is known as marker similarity<br />
(S). Lynch (1988) proposed that the expected value of S is<br />
actually a function of f and the conditional probability that<br />
marker alleles are alike <strong>in</strong> state (ais) given that they are not ibd<br />
(θ).<br />
Genetic diversity, evolution, and alien <strong>in</strong>trogression 203
Materials and methods<br />
The experiment comprised eight Philipp<strong>in</strong>e-released rice varieties<br />
and 25 of their <strong>in</strong>itial, <strong>in</strong>termediate, and immediate parents<br />
(Table 1). A set of five varieties that were not related to<br />
any of the sample materials was also grown for DNA sampl<strong>in</strong>g<br />
us<strong>in</strong>g the CTAB procedure.<br />
A total of 118 SSR primer pairs were used to survey the<br />
microsatellite polymorphism of the sample materials, follow<strong>in</strong>g<br />
the concentrations of polymerase cha<strong>in</strong> reaction (PCR)<br />
components and temperature profile recommended by Research<br />
<strong>Genetics</strong> (Huntsville, AL). PCR products were partitioned<br />
<strong>in</strong> 4% polyacrylamide gels. Silver sta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g followed the<br />
protocol provided by the manufacturer (Promega Corp., Madison,<br />
WI). Allelic bands were denoted, from the fastest to the<br />
slowest migrat<strong>in</strong>g fragments, by letters a, b, c, and so on.<br />
The coefficient of coancestry was computed for all 528<br />
pairwise genotype comb<strong>in</strong>ations, accord<strong>in</strong>g to the formula of<br />
Wright (1922). The marker-based coefficients of coancestry<br />
were computed us<strong>in</strong>g two methods. The nonrelatives method<br />
is based on the relationship of f ij to S ij :<br />
S ij = ƒ ij + (1 – ƒ ij )θ ij (1)<br />
S ij was calculated us<strong>in</strong>g simple match<strong>in</strong>g coefficients <strong>in</strong><br />
NTSYS-PC (Rohlf 1993). θ ij was obta<strong>in</strong>ed as θ ij = ½ (θ i + θ j ),<br />
where θ i (or θ j ) is the average proportion of marker variants<br />
shared between genotype i (or genotype j) <strong>in</strong> the first set and<br />
the <strong>in</strong>breds <strong>in</strong> the second set. N ƒ ij was then computed as<br />
N ƒ ij = (S ij – θ ij ) / (1 – θ ij ) (2)<br />
The second method is based on a tabular analysis procedure<br />
developed by Emik and Terrill (1949). The <strong>in</strong>breds were<br />
first sorted from oldest to newest so that an <strong>in</strong>bred was listed<br />
before any of its progenies. Start<strong>in</strong>g from the oldest <strong>in</strong>bred,<br />
the coefficient of coancestry between i and j was calculated as<br />
Τ f ij = λ a f aj + λ b f bj (3)<br />
where f aj was the coefficient of coancestry between a and j, f bj<br />
was the coefficient of coancestry between b and j, and λ a and<br />
λ b are the marker-based parental contributions of a and b, respectively,<br />
to i. A Fortran-based computer algorithm (Bernardo<br />
et al 2000) was employed for this procedure. The parental<br />
contributions were calculated as λ a = (S ai – S bi S ab )/[(1 – S ab ) 2 ]<br />
and λ b = (S bi – S ai S ab )/[(1 – S ab ) 2 ].<br />
A dendrogram was constructed from each type of estimate<br />
us<strong>in</strong>g the unweighted pair-group method with arithmetic<br />
mean. Then, the three types of estimates were compared at the<br />
<strong>in</strong>dividual value level, at the matrix level, and at the dendrogram<br />
level. To compare two matrices, the matrix correlation<br />
coefficient was computed us<strong>in</strong>g SPSS 10.0 for W<strong>in</strong>dows. To<br />
compare two classifications, a matrix of cophenetic values was<br />
produced from each of the two dendrograms. The two<br />
cophenetic matrices were then analyzed for correlation.<br />
Table 1. <strong>Rice</strong> genotypes used <strong>in</strong> the study.<br />
Designation Parentage Orig<strong>in</strong><br />
Group 1 (Sample materials)<br />
Landraces<br />
Benong<br />
C<strong>in</strong>a<br />
Dee-geo-woo-gen (DGWG)<br />
Eravapandy<br />
Kitchili Samba<br />
Latisail<br />
Pa Chiam<br />
Seraup Besar 15<br />
Tadukan<br />
Tangkai Rotan<br />
Thekkan<br />
Tsai-yuan-chan (TYC)<br />
Vellai Kar<br />
Indonesia<br />
Ch<strong>in</strong>a<br />
Ch<strong>in</strong>a<br />
India<br />
India<br />
Pakistan<br />
Ch<strong>in</strong>a<br />
Malaysia<br />
Philipp<strong>in</strong>es<br />
Malaysia<br />
India<br />
Ch<strong>in</strong>a<br />
India<br />
Selections from landraces<br />
CO18 Vellai Kar India<br />
Fortuna Pa Chiam USA<br />
GEB24 Kitchili Samba India<br />
PTB18 Eravapandy India<br />
PTB21 Thekkan India<br />
Rexoro Marong Paroc USA<br />
Breed<strong>in</strong>g materials<br />
Blue Bonnet Rexoro/Fortuna USA<br />
Intan C<strong>in</strong>a/Latisail Indonesia<br />
Peta C<strong>in</strong>a/Latisail Indonesia<br />
Sigadis Blue Bonnet/Benong Indonesia<br />
TKM6 CO18/GEB24 India<br />
TN 1 DGWG/TYC Taiwan<br />
Released varieties<br />
BPI76-1 Fortuna/Seraup Besar 15 Philipp<strong>in</strong>es<br />
C-168 Intan/BPI76-1 Philipp<strong>in</strong>es<br />
C4-137 Peta/BPI76-1 Philipp<strong>in</strong>es<br />
C4-63G Peta/BPI76-1 Philipp<strong>in</strong>es<br />
IR5 Peta/Tangkai Rotan <strong>IRRI</strong><br />
IR8 Peta/DGWG <strong>IRRI</strong><br />
IR22 IR8/Tadukan <strong>IRRI</strong><br />
UPL Ri5 Sigadis/BPI76-1 Philipp<strong>in</strong>es<br />
Group 2 (Nonrelatives)<br />
Babawee<br />
Chou Sung<br />
Hatsuboshi<br />
Nahng Mon S4<br />
Tetep<br />
Sri Lanka<br />
Korea<br />
Japan<br />
Thailand<br />
Vietnam<br />
To test for the goodness of fit of a tree matrix to the<br />
orig<strong>in</strong>al similarity matrix, a cophenetic matrix was produced<br />
from the dendrogram. Then the cophenetic correlation coefficient<br />
(r*) was computed by compar<strong>in</strong>g the similarity coefficients<br />
and the cophenetic coefficients. S<strong>in</strong>ce the cophenetic<br />
and similarity matrices were not <strong>in</strong>dependent, the critical values<br />
of r* given by Lapo<strong>in</strong>te and Legendre (1992) were used<br />
for tests of significance. As an additional measure of a<br />
dendrogram’s goodness of fit to its similarity matrix, the Colless<br />
consensus <strong>in</strong>dex (CI C ) for strict consensus trees (Rohlf 1982)<br />
was also used with the CONSEN algorithm of NTSYS-PC.<br />
204 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
Results and discussion<br />
One of the markers produced two amplifications, result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><br />
119 SSR loci <strong>in</strong> all. The number of alleles detected per locus<br />
ranged from 2 to 11, with an average of 4.7 and a total of 559.<br />
The number of SSR loci per chromosome ranged from 5 to 21,<br />
with an average of 10 per chromosome.<br />
The mean values of N f ij , T f ij , and f ij , computed <strong>in</strong> all 528<br />
pairwise genotype comb<strong>in</strong>ations, were 0.1502, 0.0452, and<br />
0.0649, respectively. N f ij deviated by ≥ 0.10 from T f ij <strong>in</strong> only<br />
44 pairs (8.3%), but both N f ij and T f ij differed by ≥ 0.10 from f ij<br />
<strong>in</strong> 269 (50.9%) and 259 (49.1%) pairs, respectively. The two<br />
marker estimates were therefore comparable with each other<br />
<strong>in</strong> agreement with f ij when mere deviations <strong>in</strong> values were considered.<br />
The mean f ij was lower than the mean N f ij because the<br />
former underestimated the true value of f because of the supposedly<br />
unrelated progenitors, which may be related after all.<br />
The mean T f ij was also lower than N f ij and about the same as<br />
the mean f ij because the tabular analysis also depended to some<br />
extent on parentage <strong>in</strong>formation. Some 128 genotype comb<strong>in</strong>ations<br />
gave 0 N f ij values, <strong>in</strong> contrast with 425 comb<strong>in</strong>ations<br />
<strong>in</strong> T f ij and <strong>in</strong> f ij . The nonrelatives method therefore demonstrated<br />
the existence of genetic relation <strong>in</strong> many genotype comb<strong>in</strong>ations<br />
by detect<strong>in</strong>g 0 < f ij ≤ 1. These comb<strong>in</strong>ations were<br />
otherwise deemed unrelated us<strong>in</strong>g the pedigree and tabular<br />
methods. T f ij , however, has an advantage over f ij <strong>in</strong> that it takes<br />
<strong>in</strong>to account the effects of selection and genetic drift by <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g<br />
the genomic contributions of the parents.<br />
Other causes of the deviations of marker estimates from<br />
pedigree estimates are selection and genetic drift, which occur<br />
dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>bred l<strong>in</strong>e development. These processes disrupt the<br />
actual proportion of loci at which two homozygous cultivars<br />
carry alleles that are ibd (Cox et al 1985). Selection is especially<br />
<strong>in</strong>tense <strong>in</strong> plant breed<strong>in</strong>g programs, favor<strong>in</strong>g those alleles<br />
that are preferred by breeders.<br />
For agreements at the matrix level, the two marker estimates<br />
( N f ij and T f ij ) were highly correlated with each other (r =<br />
0.61, P < 0.01). In the pedigree estimate, T f ij correlated better<br />
(r = 0.74, P < 0.01) than did N f ij (r = 0.49, P < 0.01). This<br />
implied that T f ij agrees better with f ij than does N f ij . The only<br />
disadvantage of T f ij is that it requires complete pedigree <strong>in</strong>formation<br />
and the DNA profile of all genotypes <strong>in</strong> the pedigree<br />
tree.<br />
Figure 1 shows the dendrograms based on N f ij and T f ij .<br />
Results revealed that N f ij (r* = 0.90, CI C = 0.97) and T f ij (r* =<br />
0.89, CI C = 1.00) were more suitable to cluster analysis than f ij<br />
(r* = 0.78, CI C = 0.79). The T f ij dendrogram was also highly<br />
compatible with the other marker estimate-based dendrogram<br />
(r* = 0.63) and with the pedigree estimate-based (r* = 0.65)<br />
dendrogram.<br />
Thus, for accuracy, T f ij is superior to N f ij when the genotypes<br />
under comparison have known and clear pedigrees, and<br />
when all the genotypes <strong>in</strong> the pedigree tree have available DNA<br />
profiles. Otherwise, N f ij estimates would be more mean<strong>in</strong>gful<br />
to use. For classification, T f ij and N f ij are about equally suitable,<br />
and are both better than f ij , for cluster analysis, but the<br />
T f ij dendrogram agreed more closely with the f ij dendrogram<br />
than did the N f ij dendrogram.<br />
The highly significant correlation of the marker estimates<br />
to f ij <strong>in</strong>dicated their validity as measures of genetic relatedness,<br />
whereas their immunity to assumptions of the pedigree<br />
method and their appropriateness to classification implied superiority<br />
to the pedigree-based method.<br />
References<br />
Bernardo R. 1993. Estimation of coefficient of coancestry us<strong>in</strong>g<br />
molecular markers <strong>in</strong> maize. Theor. Appl. Genet. 85:1055-<br />
1062.<br />
Bernardo R, Romero-Severson J, Ziegle J, Hauser J, Joe L, Hookstra<br />
G, Doerge RW. 2000. Parental contribution and coefficient of<br />
coancestry among maize <strong>in</strong>breds: pedigree, RFLP, and SSR<br />
data. Theor. Appl. Genet. 100:552-556.<br />
Cox TS, Kiang YT, Gorman MB, Rodgers DM. 1985. Relationship<br />
between coefficient of parentage and genetic similarity <strong>in</strong>dices<br />
<strong>in</strong> the soybean. Crop Sci. 25:529-532.<br />
Emik LO, Terrill CE. 1949. Systematic procedures for calculat<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>in</strong>breed<strong>in</strong>g coefficients. J. Hered. 40:51-55.<br />
Lapo<strong>in</strong>te FJ, Legendre P. 1992. Statistical significance of the matrix<br />
correlation coefficient for compar<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dependent phylogenetic<br />
trees. Syst. Biol. 41:378-384.<br />
Lynch M. 1988. Estimation of relatedness by DNA f<strong>in</strong>gerpr<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
Mol. Biol. Evol. 5:584-599.<br />
McCouch SR, Chen X, Panaud O, Temnykh S, Xu Y, Cho YG, Huang<br />
N, Ishii T, Blair M. 1997. Microsatellite marker development,<br />
mapp<strong>in</strong>g and applications <strong>in</strong> rice genetics and breed<strong>in</strong>g. Plant<br />
Mol. Biol. 35:89-99.<br />
Rohlf FJ. 1982. Consensus <strong>in</strong>dices for compar<strong>in</strong>g classifications.<br />
Math. Biosci. 59:131-144.<br />
Rohlf FJ. 1993. Numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis system<br />
v 1.80. New York (USA): Exeter Software.<br />
Smith S. 1997. Cultivar identification and varietal protection. In:<br />
Caetano-Anolles G, Gresshoff PM, editors. DNA markers:<br />
protocols, applications and overviews. New York: Wiley-Liss,<br />
Inc. p 283-299.<br />
Wright S. 1922. Coefficients of <strong>in</strong>breed<strong>in</strong>g and relationship. Am.<br />
Nat. 56:330-338.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ addresses: D.A. Tabanao, L.S. Sebastian, Plant Breed<strong>in</strong>g<br />
and Biotechnology Division, Philipp<strong>in</strong>e <strong>Rice</strong> Research Institute,<br />
Nueva Ecija; A.L. Carpena, J.E. Hernandez, Department<br />
of Agronomy, University of the Philipp<strong>in</strong>es Los Baños<br />
(UPLB); A.I.N. Gironella, Institute of Statistics, UPLB, Laguna,<br />
Philipp<strong>in</strong>es; R.N. Bernardo, Department of Agronomy,<br />
Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA.<br />
Genetic diversity, evolution, and alien <strong>in</strong>trogression 205
A<br />
Benong<br />
Blue Bonnet<br />
Fortuna<br />
Rexoro<br />
BP176-1<br />
C-168<br />
C4-137<br />
C4-63G<br />
UPLRi-5<br />
IR5<br />
Tangkai Rotan<br />
Intan<br />
Latisail<br />
Sigadis<br />
TKM6<br />
Peta<br />
Seraup Besar 15<br />
C<strong>in</strong>a<br />
DGWG<br />
IR8<br />
IR22<br />
TN1<br />
Tsai Yuan Chan<br />
GEB24<br />
Kitchili Samba<br />
Tadukan<br />
Thekkan<br />
CO18<br />
Vellai Kar<br />
Eravapandy<br />
PTB18<br />
PTB21<br />
Pa Chiam<br />
0.00<br />
0.25<br />
0.50<br />
0.75<br />
1.00<br />
B<br />
Benong<br />
Sigadis<br />
Blue Bonnet<br />
Fortuna<br />
Rexoro<br />
Pa Chiam<br />
BP176-1<br />
C-168<br />
C4-137<br />
C4-63G<br />
UPLRi-5<br />
Seraup Besar 15<br />
C<strong>in</strong>a<br />
Intan<br />
Latisail<br />
Peta<br />
DGWG<br />
IR8<br />
IR22<br />
IR5<br />
Tangkai Rotan<br />
TN1<br />
Tsai Yuan Chan<br />
Tadukan<br />
CO18<br />
Vellai Kar<br />
GEB24<br />
Kitchili Samba<br />
TKM6<br />
PTB21<br />
Thekkan<br />
Eravapandy<br />
PTB18<br />
0.00<br />
0.25<br />
0.50<br />
0.75<br />
1.00<br />
Fig. 1. Dendrograms show<strong>in</strong>g genetic relationships of 33 genotypes based on markerbased<br />
coefficients of coancestry (A = nonrelatives method, N f ij ; B = tabular method,<br />
T f ij ).<br />
206 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
Molecular cytological studies on<br />
a poly-egg rice mutant AP IV stra<strong>in</strong><br />
Y. Lu and X. Liu<br />
The AP stra<strong>in</strong> is a mutant of poly-egg rice with one or more eggs <strong>in</strong> the AP embryo sac. In this poly-egg embryo sac, three eggs<br />
are a majority. They could be further divided <strong>in</strong>to three types—“5-2-1” type, “6-2-0” type, and “5-3-0” type—depend<strong>in</strong>g on<br />
the whole structure of the embryo sac. Three types of embryo sac orig<strong>in</strong>ated from a different new polygonum variant. In the new<br />
polygonum variant, the early stage, from archesporial cell to megaspore, was not different. The difference appeared only <strong>in</strong> the<br />
late stage, from the s<strong>in</strong>gle nucleate embryo sac stage to the mature embryo sac stage. By us<strong>in</strong>g the immunological fluorescence<br />
technique, nuclear behavior was confirmed to be abnormal. Abnormal microtubule behavior resulted <strong>in</strong> irregular position<strong>in</strong>g<br />
of the nuclei as well as asynchronous microtubular patterns <strong>in</strong> different pairs of nuclei. Genetic polymorphism for the<br />
structure of the embryo sac was found <strong>in</strong> a s<strong>in</strong>gle panicle of AP. The gametophytic genotype, rather than the sporophytic<br />
genotype, regulated microtubule behavior. It was suspected that some retrotransposons might control these abnormal cytoskeletal<br />
activities.<br />
Gametophyte mutants play an important role <strong>in</strong> the study of<br />
molecular biology and plant breed<strong>in</strong>g. Many male gametophyte<br />
mutants have been reported <strong>in</strong> rice, but only a few female gametophyte<br />
mutants have been found (Lu and Liu 1998). Among<br />
them, only the poly-egg mutant (AP IV) has undergone cytological<br />
analysis (Liu et al 1996a,b,c). One or more than one<br />
embryo were found to result from fertilization and development<br />
from the poly-egg apparatus <strong>in</strong> AP IV. In this embryo<br />
sac, three eggs are the majority. They could be further divided<br />
<strong>in</strong>to three types, depend<strong>in</strong>g on the structure of the embryo sac,<br />
that orig<strong>in</strong>ated from different new polygonum variants. Liu<br />
and Lu (1996b) concluded that four factors might have resulted<br />
<strong>in</strong> these new polygonum variants: (1) the nucleus location<br />
of the mononucleate embryo sac, (2) the direction of<br />
nucleus division, (3) nonsynchronization of the sister nucleus,<br />
and (4) the movement of a new division nucleus. Many studies<br />
had <strong>in</strong>dicated that these four factors correlated with the microtubule<br />
organization. In this paper, the patterns of microtubule<br />
organization <strong>in</strong> different types of embryo sacs, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
normal polygonum type, were observed with the immunological<br />
fluorescence technique.<br />
Materials and methods<br />
The rice polyembryonic l<strong>in</strong>e AP IV was planted at the South<br />
Ch<strong>in</strong>a Agricultural University (SCAU). Spikelets were collected<br />
at different stages of development. Ovules were dissected<br />
and fixed <strong>in</strong> a mixture consist<strong>in</strong>g of 4% paraformaldehyde,<br />
10% DMSO, and 0.01% Triton X-100 <strong>in</strong> PEMG (2 mM<br />
MgSO 4 , 5 mM EGTA, and 4% sucrose, pH 6.8) for 1 h at<br />
room temperature. After r<strong>in</strong>s<strong>in</strong>g with PEMG buffer three times,<br />
samples were dehydrated <strong>in</strong> a graded series of ethanol. At 100%<br />
ethanol, the temperature was raised to 56 °C; the ethanol was<br />
then replaced by the PEG <strong>in</strong>filtration mixture. Mixtures were<br />
subsequently replaced twice by pure PEG for 45 m<strong>in</strong>, the ovules<br />
were transferred <strong>in</strong>to an eppendorf tube, and the tube was allowed<br />
to cool slowly. Sections that were 30–50 mm thick were<br />
prepared with a razor blade on an AO microtome. The sections<br />
were put <strong>in</strong>to a “microtube apparatus.” After r<strong>in</strong>s<strong>in</strong>g with<br />
distilled water three times, samples were treated with 0.1 NH 4 Cl<br />
for 3 m<strong>in</strong> and r<strong>in</strong>sed three times for 5 m<strong>in</strong> each <strong>in</strong> PBS. Subsequently,<br />
the sections were treated with 1% Tween-20 for 20<br />
m<strong>in</strong> and <strong>in</strong>cubated with 1% BSA for 8 m<strong>in</strong>.<br />
The sections were then <strong>in</strong>cubated <strong>in</strong> 100 µL of monoclonal<br />
antibody anti-α-tubul<strong>in</strong> (Sigma T-9026) diluted l:25 <strong>in</strong><br />
PBS for 45 m<strong>in</strong>. After r<strong>in</strong>s<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> PBS three times, the sections<br />
were <strong>in</strong>cubated <strong>in</strong> antimouse IgG (whole molecule) FITC conjugate<br />
(Sigma F-0257) diluted 1:80 with PBS for 45 m<strong>in</strong>. The<br />
sections were then transferred to a slide mounted <strong>in</strong> antifad<strong>in</strong>g<br />
solutions and exam<strong>in</strong>ed under a Leica TNT confocal laserscann<strong>in</strong>g<br />
microscope. The confocal images were recorded by<br />
Kodak T-Max 100.<br />
Results and discussion<br />
Megasporogenesis<br />
The PEG sections further proved that the megasporogenesis<br />
of three polygonum-variant types of AP IV—“5-2-1”, “6-2-<br />
0”, and “5-3-0”—was the same as that of the normal polygonum<br />
type. The megasporogenesis <strong>in</strong>cluded four developmental<br />
stages. The pattern of microtubule configuration at different<br />
developmental stages was studied.<br />
Archesporial cell. The archesporial cell was located at<br />
the uppermost end of the ovule just underneath the epidermis.<br />
The cell was larger than other nucellar cells around. It had an<br />
obvious nucleus and conta<strong>in</strong>ed a complex network of microtubules<br />
around the nuclear membrane.<br />
Megasporocyte (<strong>in</strong>terphase). The archesporial cell enlarged<br />
and developed <strong>in</strong>to a megasporocyte. The nucleus of<br />
the megasporocyte moved near the micropyle end. There was<br />
no difference <strong>in</strong> microtubules between the megasporocyte and<br />
the archesporial cell, but the microtubules accumulated near<br />
the micropyle end.<br />
Genetic diversity, evolution, and alien <strong>in</strong>trogression 207
Meiosis. Microtubules became strongly reoriented <strong>in</strong> the<br />
megasporocyte dur<strong>in</strong>g meiosis. They reoriented and organized<br />
to sp<strong>in</strong>dle <strong>in</strong> metaphase I, becom<strong>in</strong>g radiated <strong>in</strong> the dyad. In<br />
the tetrad, the megaspore had radiated microtubules only near<br />
the chalazal end. There were little microtubules <strong>in</strong> the other<br />
cells.<br />
Megaspore. The cell near the chalazal end developed<br />
<strong>in</strong>to a functional megaspore. Microtubules were arranged randomly<br />
<strong>in</strong> the functional megaspore.<br />
Megagametogenesis<br />
In the normal polygonum type, megagametogenesis <strong>in</strong> rice went<br />
through the mononucleate embryo sac, two-nucleate embryo<br />
sac, four-nucleate embryo sac, eight-nucleate embryo sac, and<br />
mature embryo sac phases. The megagametogenesis of the<br />
polygonum-variant type <strong>in</strong>volved the three-nucleate embryo<br />
sac and five-nucleate embryo sac.<br />
In the normal polygonum type, the functional megaspore<br />
expanded somewhat with the formation of a large vacuole at<br />
each pole of the cell with the nucleus localized at its center,<br />
and developed <strong>in</strong>to a mononucleate embryo sac. The microtubules<br />
of the mononucleate embryo sac were mostly per<strong>in</strong>uclear,<br />
and many longitud<strong>in</strong>al microtubular bundles extended from<br />
the nucleus to the opposite cell poles. In the mononucleate<br />
embryo sac of the 5-2-1 type, microtubules were the same as<br />
those <strong>in</strong> the normal mononucleate embryo sac. In the<br />
mononucleate embryo sac of the 6-2-0 type and 5-3-0 type<br />
(polygonum-variant type, the same as below), the nucleus of<br />
the embryo sac was located near the micropyle end, and only<br />
some radiated microtubules were observed around the nuclear<br />
membrane.<br />
The first mitotic division of the mononucleate embryo<br />
sac gave rise to the two-nucleate embryo sac, of which the two<br />
nuclei migrated to the opposite poles. Microtubules were localized<br />
at the per<strong>in</strong>uclear region, and some radiated microtubules<br />
were found around the nuclei membrane. In the twonucleate<br />
embryo sac of the 6-2-0 and 5-3-0 types, the two nuclei<br />
were at the micropyle end. Subsequently, a nucleus at the<br />
micropyle end divided and developed <strong>in</strong>to a three-nucleate<br />
embryo sac. Microtubules <strong>in</strong> the three-nucleate embryo sac<br />
exhibited a network-like array and encircled the three nuclei.<br />
In a normal four-nucleate embryo sac, <strong>in</strong> which two sister<br />
nuclei were located at opposite poles, many condensed microtubules<br />
were observed around the nuclei <strong>in</strong> the chalazal<br />
end, and only a few around the nuclei <strong>in</strong> the micropyle end. In<br />
the polygonum-variant types (5-3-0 and 6-2-0), there were four<br />
nuclei, all located near the micropyle end. The microtubules<br />
<strong>in</strong> the two k<strong>in</strong>ds of four-nucleate embryo sac displayed a complex<br />
network, with the four nuclei buried <strong>in</strong> the microtubules.<br />
In the four-nucleate embryo sac of the 5-2-1 type, one nucleus<br />
was located <strong>in</strong> the chalazal end and the other three nuclei <strong>in</strong><br />
the micropyle end. Before go<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to the eight-nucleate embryo<br />
sac stage, the five-nucleate embryo sac may have developed<br />
<strong>in</strong>to the polygonum-variant type.<br />
In the 5-2-1 type mature embryo sac, there were three<br />
egg cells and two synergids <strong>in</strong> the micropyle end, two polar<br />
nuclei on the egg cells, and one antipodal <strong>in</strong> the chalazal end.<br />
In the 5-3-0-type mature embryo sac, there were three egg cells<br />
and two synergids <strong>in</strong> the micropyle end, two polar nuclei on<br />
the top of the egg cells, and one antipodal near the polar nuclei.<br />
In the 6-2-0-type mature embryo sac, there were three<br />
egg cells, two synergids, and one antipodal <strong>in</strong> the micropyle<br />
end, and two nuclei on the top of the egg cell.<br />
Many different patterns of microtubules were found at<br />
different developmental stages of the AP IV embryo sac. In<br />
the normal polygonum type, crucial features <strong>in</strong>cluded microtubules<br />
of the mononucleate embryo sac longitud<strong>in</strong>ally extend<strong>in</strong>g<br />
from the nucleus to the opposite pole of the cell. These<br />
features appeared to be important <strong>in</strong> the precise position<strong>in</strong>g of<br />
nuclei dur<strong>in</strong>g the development of the embryo sac (Huang and<br />
Sheridan 1996). However, these features were lack<strong>in</strong>g dur<strong>in</strong>g<br />
the development of the polygonum-variant embryo sac. Abnormal<br />
microtubule patterns accompanied the unsynchronized<br />
and abnormal nuclear movements. In the mononucleate embryo<br />
sac of the 5-3-0 and 6-2-0 types, the fused radiated microtubules<br />
replaced the longitud<strong>in</strong>ally extend<strong>in</strong>g microtubules.<br />
This was the crucial factor, which caused the nucleus to move<br />
to the micropyle end. In the two-nucleate and four-nucleate<br />
embryo sacs of the 6-2-0 and 5-3-0 types, we found other radiated<br />
per<strong>in</strong>uclear microtubules, which were different from those<br />
<strong>in</strong> the normal polygonum type. These microtubules ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
abnormal nuclear movement and resulted <strong>in</strong> the abnormal<br />
mature embryo sac. Liu et al (1996c) had proved that genetic<br />
polymorphism <strong>in</strong> the structure of the embryo sac existed <strong>in</strong> a<br />
s<strong>in</strong>gle panicle of the AP. The gametophytic genotype, rather<br />
than the sporophytic structure, regulated the microtubule behavior<br />
(Liu et al 1996a,b,c). It was suspected that some<br />
retrotransposons might control the abnormal microtubule activities,<br />
which affected the normal action of the nucleus.<br />
References<br />
Huang BQ, Sheridan WF. 1996. Embryo sac development <strong>in</strong> the<br />
maize <strong>in</strong>determ<strong>in</strong>ate gametophyte1 mutant: abnormal nuclear<br />
behavior and defective microtubule organization. Plant Cell<br />
8:1391-1407.<br />
Liu XD, Lu YG, Chen QF. 1996a. Studies on the <strong>in</strong>heritance of polyeggs<br />
<strong>in</strong> polyembryonic rice stra<strong>in</strong> AP. Hereditas 18(5):7-10.<br />
(In Ch<strong>in</strong>ese with English abstract.)<br />
Liu XD, Lu YG, Xu XB, Zee SY. 1996b. Formation and development<br />
of different types of embryo sacs <strong>in</strong> polyembryonic rice<br />
stra<strong>in</strong> AP. Acta Bot. S<strong>in</strong>. 38(10):767-771. (In Ch<strong>in</strong>ese with<br />
English abstract.)<br />
Liu XD, Lu YG, Xu XB, Zee SY. 1996c. Study on the structure and<br />
genetic polymorphism of embryo sac <strong>in</strong> polyembryonic rice<br />
stra<strong>in</strong> AP. Acta Bot. S<strong>in</strong>. 38(8):594-598. (In Ch<strong>in</strong>ese with<br />
English abstract.)<br />
208 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
Lu YG, Liu XD. 1998. A mutant for variable egg number <strong>in</strong> rice.<br />
<strong>Rice</strong> Genet. Newsl. 15:121-122.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ address: Plant Molecular Breed<strong>in</strong>g Research Center, South<br />
Ch<strong>in</strong>a Agricultural University, Guangzhou, Guangdong,<br />
Ch<strong>in</strong>a.<br />
Acknowledgments: The authors wish to thank Prof. S.Y. Zee of the<br />
University of Hong Kong for provid<strong>in</strong>g facilities for research<br />
and for helpful discussions. The authors also wish to thank<br />
Mr. Honglong Zhu, a graduate student of the Department of<br />
Agronomy, for help<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the PEG cutt<strong>in</strong>g section. This research<br />
was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation<br />
of Ch<strong>in</strong>a (39600008).<br />
Genetic diversity, evolution, and alien <strong>in</strong>trogression 209
Molecular markers, QTL mapp<strong>in</strong>g,<br />
and marker-assisted selection<br />
Molecular markers, QTL mapp<strong>in</strong>g, and marker-assisted selection 211
212 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
The application of molecular markers <strong>in</strong> rice<br />
M. Christopher, S. Garland, R. Re<strong>in</strong>ke, and R. Henry<br />
Few rice improvement programs are tak<strong>in</strong>g full advantage of molecular marker technologies. Traits to be targeted for the<br />
development of molecular markers <strong>in</strong> the short term should ideally be of importance to the <strong>in</strong>dustry, simply <strong>in</strong>herited, and highly<br />
heritable, but difficult or unreliable to select us<strong>in</strong>g nonmolecular methods, and/or be desirable to select earlier <strong>in</strong> the program.<br />
Information should be available on mode of <strong>in</strong>heritance and map location from populations similar to the population of <strong>in</strong>terest<br />
and exist<strong>in</strong>g polymerase cha<strong>in</strong> reaction (PCR)-based markers. Traits to be targeted <strong>in</strong> the longer term should be of high<br />
importance but may be more complex. They may be multigenic or quantitative and <strong>in</strong>fluenced by the environment. The mode<br />
of <strong>in</strong>heritance for some traits may require clarification and gene location may be unknown. PCR-based markers may require<br />
development from bulk segregation analysis, from known restriction fragment length polymorphism markers, from sequence<br />
<strong>in</strong>formation, or from other methods. The availability of extensive map and sequence <strong>in</strong>formation offers an opportunity to design<br />
sequence-tagged sites or microsatellite primers close to genes, with<strong>in</strong> expressed sequences, or with<strong>in</strong> genes. These candidate<br />
markers should then be tested for level of polymorphism with<strong>in</strong> the parental germplasm set, for degree of l<strong>in</strong>kage to the target<br />
trait, and for robustness <strong>in</strong> high-throughput screen<strong>in</strong>g systems. Three approaches can be considered for the <strong>in</strong>corporation of<br />
molecular markers <strong>in</strong>to a rice improvement program: (1) as an addendum to the exist<strong>in</strong>g program; (2) as one or more separate<br />
subprograms, for example, as part of a backcross<strong>in</strong>g program or as a separate s<strong>in</strong>gle-seed-descent subprogram; and (3) as<br />
part of a radical redesign of the breed<strong>in</strong>g and selection program, perhaps <strong>in</strong>corporat<strong>in</strong>g doubled-haploid technology. The choice<br />
of approach will depend on the characters of <strong>in</strong>terest, the resources available, and the time frame. Applications of molecular<br />
markers to rice improvement other than for marker-assisted selection <strong>in</strong>clude identification of true hybrids, identification of<br />
contested parentage, accelerated backcross<strong>in</strong>g, track<strong>in</strong>g of male sterility genes, identification of appropriate parents, and <strong>in</strong><br />
the study of wide hybrids. Strategies for the <strong>in</strong>troduction of molecular marker technologies <strong>in</strong>to the Australian rice improvement<br />
program are discussed, us<strong>in</strong>g fragrance and semidwarfism as examples.<br />
Molecular markers provide the ideal tool for improv<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
effectiveness of selection for desirable traits <strong>in</strong> new rice varieties.<br />
The characters most suited to molecular marker-assisted<br />
selection must be identified and methods for the <strong>in</strong>tegration of<br />
molecular technologies with current breed<strong>in</strong>g strategies devised.<br />
The application of molecular markers <strong>in</strong> the Australian<br />
rice <strong>in</strong>dustry will <strong>in</strong>clude (1) an assessment of markers already<br />
developed for use <strong>in</strong> Australian rice breed<strong>in</strong>g populations, (2)<br />
identification of new characters for future applications of molecular<br />
markers, and (3) consideration of strategies for the <strong>in</strong>troduction<br />
of molecular marker technologies <strong>in</strong>to the Australian<br />
rice improvement program.<br />
Exist<strong>in</strong>g markers<br />
Garland and Henry (2000) developed molecular markers for<br />
the identification of major genes govern<strong>in</strong>g semidwarf (sd1)<br />
and gra<strong>in</strong> fragrance (fgr) <strong>in</strong> rice.<br />
Semidwarfism<br />
The semidwarf gene (sd1) is responsible for produc<strong>in</strong>g sturdy,<br />
moderately short plants with a high harvest <strong>in</strong>dex. This gene is<br />
the source of semidwarfism <strong>in</strong> Australian rice varieties (Garland<br />
and Henry 2000). Plant height is also <strong>in</strong>fluenced by environmental<br />
and other genetic factors. A molecular marker for<br />
this trait will allow sd1 to be detected accurately on a s<strong>in</strong>gleplant<br />
basis, early <strong>in</strong> a selection program, regardless of confound<strong>in</strong>g<br />
effects.<br />
Four useful polymerase cha<strong>in</strong> reaction (PCR)-based<br />
markers, closely l<strong>in</strong>ked to sd1, have been produced. They are<br />
SCU-<strong>Rice</strong>-SSR-2 (source RG109) and SCU-<strong>Rice</strong>-STS-13312,<br />
detected by size separation, and SCU-<strong>Rice</strong>-STS-S13471 and<br />
SCU-<strong>Rice</strong>-STS-RG220, detected through restriction digest<br />
(Garland and Henry 2000). A suitable polymorphic marker<br />
was detected for most of the pairwise comparisons between<br />
the semidwarf and tall varieties. It is envisioned that the markers<br />
for sd1 will be applied to marker-assisted backcross<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
Fragrance<br />
The genetic control of fragrance <strong>in</strong> rice is more complicated<br />
than that of semidwarfism. Fragrance is the essential character<br />
<strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> the production of basmati- or jasm<strong>in</strong>e-type aroma.<br />
Several chemicals are <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> produc<strong>in</strong>g this aroma (Buttery<br />
et al 1983); however, a s<strong>in</strong>gle constituent (2-acetyl-1-<br />
pyrrol<strong>in</strong>e) is believed to be a major component and is controlled<br />
by a s<strong>in</strong>gle gene (Garland et al 2000). The current assessment<br />
method of tast<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dividual gra<strong>in</strong>s for fragrance <strong>in</strong><br />
rice is labor-<strong>in</strong>tensive and <strong>in</strong>accurate (Garland and Henry<br />
2000).<br />
Three PCR-based markers—SCU-<strong>Rice</strong>-SSR-1, RM223,<br />
and RM42—have been identified for fgr (Garland et al 2000).<br />
A suitable polymorphic marker was detected for most pairwise<br />
comparisons between fragrant and nonfragrant varieties. These<br />
markers have already been used for the selection of fragrant<br />
breed<strong>in</strong>g l<strong>in</strong>es from several populations <strong>in</strong> the Australian breed<strong>in</strong>g<br />
program.<br />
A few important parent comb<strong>in</strong>ations, however, cannot<br />
be dist<strong>in</strong>guished for their fragrance status us<strong>in</strong>g these markers.<br />
Development of further markers for fgr, to dist<strong>in</strong>guish<br />
between some important parental breed<strong>in</strong>g comb<strong>in</strong>ations, is<br />
therefore an important objective.<br />
Molecular markers, QTL mapp<strong>in</strong>g, and marker-assisted selection 213
Identify<strong>in</strong>g potential characters for the application of molecular<br />
marker-assisted selection<br />
Potential for the application of molecular markers to the Australian<br />
rice breed<strong>in</strong>g program has been assessed through the<br />
follow<strong>in</strong>g process:<br />
1. The current rice improvement methods and strategy<br />
were broadly def<strong>in</strong>ed.<br />
2. A comprehensive list of breed<strong>in</strong>g objectives was compiled.<br />
3. Criteria were def<strong>in</strong>ed for the identification of traits<br />
most suited to the application of molecular markers.<br />
4. Literature was searched to assess the state of development<br />
of markers and the application of marker-assisted<br />
selection for each of these characters.<br />
Current improvement strategies<br />
Recurrent selection methodologies are primarily used <strong>in</strong> the<br />
Australian rice improvement program. Typically, varieties will<br />
undergo 8–12 years of assessment from the time of <strong>in</strong>itial cross<br />
through selection and release. Crosses are generally biparental.<br />
Selection <strong>in</strong> early generations is based on agronomic performance<br />
and visually assessed seed characters. More emphasis<br />
is placed on quality characters <strong>in</strong> later generations of the<br />
selection process. From around one million <strong>in</strong>dividual plants<br />
tested <strong>in</strong> the F 2 generation, as few as one l<strong>in</strong>e may be selected<br />
for release as a new variety.<br />
Breed<strong>in</strong>g objectives<br />
The Australian rice improvement program breeds for eight<br />
major gra<strong>in</strong> types. These encompass short-, medium-, and longgra<strong>in</strong><br />
types, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g fragrant, arborio, and sushi types. Waxy<br />
or organically produced rice may be important <strong>in</strong> the future.<br />
Breed<strong>in</strong>g objectives currently applied by the Australian<br />
rice improvement program can be broadly classified as agronomic<br />
or quality-related (Table 1). As well as yield per se,<br />
most specific characters relate to avoidance of or tolerance for<br />
abiotic stresses and to harvestability. Characters listed as potential/future<br />
agronomic target attributes relate to potential<br />
threats of disease and possible changes <strong>in</strong> agronomic practices<br />
associated with susta<strong>in</strong>ability. Quality-related breed<strong>in</strong>g<br />
objectives relate to consumer preference and process<strong>in</strong>g traits.<br />
Potential/future quality traits <strong>in</strong>clude possible changes <strong>in</strong> enduse<br />
or access to different market niches.<br />
Criteria for identify<strong>in</strong>g traits suited to the application<br />
of molecular markers<br />
Markers can be developed <strong>in</strong> the short, medium, and long term.<br />
The criteria for selection of target traits <strong>in</strong>clude<br />
l The character is of importance to <strong>in</strong>dustry.<br />
l The trait is relatively simply <strong>in</strong>herited.<br />
l The character is difficult to assess.<br />
l<br />
l<br />
The exist<strong>in</strong>g assessment of the trait is unreliable.<br />
The trait is <strong>in</strong>fluenced to a large extent by the environment<br />
or by G × E <strong>in</strong>teractions.<br />
l It would be desirable to test for the trait earlier <strong>in</strong> the<br />
breed<strong>in</strong>g program.<br />
l The trait cannot be assessed us<strong>in</strong>g a bioassay <strong>in</strong> Australia.<br />
For example, quarant<strong>in</strong>e considerations prevent<br />
the <strong>in</strong>troduction of new diseases <strong>in</strong>to Australia. Hav<strong>in</strong>g<br />
resistance to these diseases <strong>in</strong> the local germplasm<br />
would be a prudent safeguard aga<strong>in</strong>st disease outbreaks.<br />
Us<strong>in</strong>g these criteria, a set of characters potentially suited<br />
to the application of selection us<strong>in</strong>g molecular markers is highlighted<br />
<strong>in</strong> Table 1.<br />
Strategies for <strong>in</strong>troduc<strong>in</strong>g molecular marker technologies <strong>in</strong>to<br />
the improvement program<br />
Options for <strong>in</strong>corporat<strong>in</strong>g molecular markers<br />
Three general approaches can be considered for <strong>in</strong>corporat<strong>in</strong>g<br />
molecular markers <strong>in</strong>to the Australian rice improvement program:<br />
1. Incorporation as an adjunct to the exist<strong>in</strong>g program.<br />
2. Use <strong>in</strong> one or more subprograms: (a) as part of a backcross<strong>in</strong>g<br />
(or enhanced backcross<strong>in</strong>g) program or (b)<br />
as a separate s<strong>in</strong>gle-seed-descent subprogram.<br />
3. As part of a radical redesign of the breed<strong>in</strong>g and selection<br />
program.<br />
This is likely to <strong>in</strong>volve <strong>in</strong>corporat<strong>in</strong>g the use of both<br />
molecular markers and doubled haploids. Involvement would<br />
beg<strong>in</strong> with parent selection, and molecular markers could be<br />
<strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> the improvement process right through pure seed<br />
selection and variety registration.<br />
Which of the above options is the most appropriate will<br />
depend on the characters be<strong>in</strong>g selected. For example, the use<br />
of molecular markers for fragrance may suit option 1. Option<br />
2 would suit <strong>in</strong>corporation of disease resistances. Options 1<br />
and 2 could probably be undertaken with<strong>in</strong> the next year or<br />
two, whereas option 3 could be implemented <strong>in</strong> the longer term<br />
of perhaps 4–6 years.<br />
References<br />
Buttery RG, L<strong>in</strong>g LC, Bienvenido OJ, Turnbaugh JG. 1983. Cooked<br />
rice aroma and 2-acetyl-1-pyrrol<strong>in</strong>e. J. Agric. Food Chem.<br />
31:823-826.<br />
Garland S, Henry R. 2000. Application of molecular markers to rice<br />
breed<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Australia: molecular markers for the sd-1 and fgr<br />
genes. A report for the Rural Industries Research and Development<br />
Corporation. K<strong>in</strong>gston, ACT (Australia): RIRDC.<br />
Garland S, Lew<strong>in</strong> L, Blakeney A, Re<strong>in</strong>ke R, Henry R. 2000. PCRbased<br />
molecular markers for the fragrance gene <strong>in</strong> rice (Oryza<br />
sativa L.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 101(3):364-371.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ addresses: M. Christopher, S. Garland, and R. Henry, Centre<br />
for Plant Conservation <strong>Genetics</strong>, Southern Cross University,<br />
PO Box 157, Lismore, NSW 2480, Australia; R. Re<strong>in</strong>ke, Yanco<br />
Agricultural Institute, Yanco, NSW 2703, Australia.<br />
214 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
Table 1. Traits currently selected as part of the Australian rice improvement program, and characters that may be<br />
desirable to select, where a more suitable selection method is available. Some of the traits listed overlap. Characters<br />
<strong>in</strong> bold <strong>in</strong>dicate traits considered good candidates for the development of molecular markers for the Australian<br />
rice improvement program. For height (semidwarf) and major fragrance components, markers have already<br />
been developed for use <strong>in</strong> Australian breed<strong>in</strong>g populations. In addition to those characters selected, cold tolerance,<br />
starch content and starch characters, and the sun-crack<strong>in</strong>g character are be<strong>in</strong>g exam<strong>in</strong>ed by other projects.<br />
Simply Environmental Current assessment<br />
Breed<strong>in</strong>g objectives <strong>in</strong>herited <strong>in</strong>fluence<br />
Difficulty Accuracy Stage Importance<br />
Agronomic<br />
Current<br />
Yield potential No High Medium High Late Very high<br />
Height (semidwarf) Yes High Medium Medium Early High<br />
Reduced lodg<strong>in</strong>g Yes High Low High Early High<br />
Cold tolerance: at reproductive stage No High Medium-high High Medium Very high<br />
at establishment No High Medium-high Medium Medium High<br />
Short grow<strong>in</strong>g season, early maturity Medium Low High Early High<br />
No pubescence Yes Low Low High Early Medium Hull color<br />
Yes Low Low High Early Medium Awnless Yes M e -<br />
dium Low High Early Medium Straight head High<br />
Medium Medium Medium Medium Split gloom High Medium<br />
Medium Medium Low<br />
Ease of thresh<strong>in</strong>g Medium Low Medium Medium Medium<br />
Future/possible<br />
Disease resistance: blast Yes High High na a na Medium<br />
sheath blight Yes High High na na Medium<br />
bacterial blight Yes High High na na Medium<br />
Herbicide resistance Yes Medium Low na na Low<br />
Water-use efficiency No Medium High na na High<br />
Nutrient efficiency (especially nitrogen) No High High na na Medium<br />
Allelopathy na na Medium<br />
Seedl<strong>in</strong>g vigor (water-use No High High na na High<br />
efficiency/weeds/organic)<br />
Flood<strong>in</strong>g tolerance No High Medium na na Medium<br />
Quality<br />
Current<br />
Amylose type and content Yes Medium Medium Medium Medium High<br />
Amylopect<strong>in</strong> type and content Yes Medium Medium Medium Medium High<br />
Gra<strong>in</strong> length × width Yes Medium Low High Late High<br />
Gra<strong>in</strong> extension when cooked Yes Low Medium High Late High<br />
Low chalk Yes High Low High Late High<br />
Taste/fragrance as major component Yes Medium High Low Early<br />
Gelat<strong>in</strong>ization temperature Yes Low Medium Medium Medium High<br />
Cook<strong>in</strong>g time Yes Low Medium Medium Late Low<br />
Sun crack<strong>in</strong>g Yes High Low High Medium High<br />
Pericarp color Yes Low Low High Early Medium<br />
Milled gra<strong>in</strong> color Yes Medium Medium High Late High<br />
% whole-gra<strong>in</strong> mill out No High Low High Medium High<br />
1,000-gra<strong>in</strong> weight No Medium Low High Medium High<br />
Future/possible<br />
Taste/fragrance as m<strong>in</strong>or Yes Medium High na na Medium<br />
component<br />
Prote<strong>in</strong> type and content Yes High Low na na Medium<br />
Fiber/starch cha<strong>in</strong> content na na Medium<br />
Gra<strong>in</strong> length × width consistency<br />
with<strong>in</strong> plant Medium Medium na na Medium<br />
Standability No High na na Medium<br />
Translucence High na na Medium<br />
Waxy type Yes Low Low na na Low<br />
Nutrition Medium Medium/high na na <br />
a na = not applicable.<br />
Molecular markers, QTL mapp<strong>in</strong>g, and marker-assisted selection 215
Application of molecular markers <strong>in</strong> rice breed<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>in</strong> the Mekong Delta of Vietnam<br />
Bui Chi Buu and Nguyen Thi Lang<br />
The Mekong Delta is considered the largest granary of the country and it contributes more than 50% of rice production <strong>in</strong><br />
Vietnam. Both conventional and nonconventional breed<strong>in</strong>g methods are be<strong>in</strong>g employed <strong>in</strong> rice. Marker-aided selection (MAS)<br />
is applied to enhance selection efficiency. Genetic diversity was analyzed among wild species and landraces to select appropriate<br />
breed<strong>in</strong>g materials through isozyme markers and RAPD. Sequence-tagged site (STS) markers were used to detect<br />
resistance genes for brown planthopper (BPH), bacterial blight, and blast. Most traditional cultivars <strong>in</strong> the delta were considered<br />
as good sources for genes Pi2, xa5, and xa13. RG457 was found to be a useful marker for detect<strong>in</strong>g BPH resistance to<br />
biotypes 2 and 3. QTL analysis on salt tolerance was implemented with recomb<strong>in</strong>ant <strong>in</strong>bred l<strong>in</strong>e Tenasai 2/CB and F 3<br />
populations<br />
(IR28/Doc Phung). The 31 microsatellite markers and 74 RFLP markers were assigned to l<strong>in</strong>kage groups. The l<strong>in</strong>kage map<br />
had a total map length of 2,340.50 cM. Markers associated with salt tolerance were located mostly on chromosomes 1, 2, 3,<br />
9, 11, and 12. Four QTLs were identified for seedl<strong>in</strong>g survival, one for dry shoot weight, two for dry root weight, one for Na +<br />
absorption, one for K + absorption, and four for Na + / K + ratio.<br />
The Mekong Delta is considered the largest granary of the<br />
country and plays the most important role <strong>in</strong> food security<br />
policy. The delta contributes more than 50% of rice production<br />
<strong>in</strong> the whole country. By 2010, the delta must produce<br />
18–20 million t of rice. This a great challenge for rice breeders<br />
at the Cuu Long Delta <strong>Rice</strong> Research Institute (CLRRI).<br />
CLRRI has released 62 varieties s<strong>in</strong>ce 1977. However, the delta<br />
has 1.8 million ha of acid sulfate soil and 0.7 million ha of<br />
sal<strong>in</strong>ity. Intensive rice cultivation <strong>in</strong> the delta has led to an<br />
<strong>in</strong>creased threat from cont<strong>in</strong>uously chang<strong>in</strong>g disease races and<br />
<strong>in</strong>sect biotypes. To overcome these constra<strong>in</strong>ts, there is an urgent<br />
need to widen the gene pool of rice cultivars. Wild species<br />
of rice are an important reservoir of useful genes. Molecular<br />
breed<strong>in</strong>g provides powerful new tools for rice improvement.<br />
Molecular markers have several advantages over the traditional<br />
phenotypic markers that were previously available to<br />
plant breeders. They offer great scope for improv<strong>in</strong>g the efficiency<br />
of conventional plant breed<strong>in</strong>g by carry<strong>in</strong>g out selection<br />
not directly on the trait of <strong>in</strong>terest but on molecular markers<br />
l<strong>in</strong>ked to that trait. Molecular markers applied <strong>in</strong> rice breed<strong>in</strong>g<br />
at CLRRI have been used for some major biotic stresses<br />
such as brown planthopper, blast, and bacterial blight and they<br />
have also been used to analyze the genetic diversity of rice<br />
germplasm, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g 1,800 accessions of landraces and nearly<br />
200 populations of three wild rice species (Oryza rufipogon,<br />
O. nivara, and O. offic<strong>in</strong>alis). Quantitative trait loci analyses<br />
on salt tolerance and alum<strong>in</strong>um toxicity tolerance have been<br />
ma<strong>in</strong> activities of rice genomics at CLRRI.<br />
Genetic diversity<br />
South Asia is a rich source of diversity for rice and its relatives.<br />
The primary area of diversity for rice extends from the<br />
foothills of the Himalayas from Nepal to northern Vietnam<br />
(Chang 1976). Previous collect<strong>in</strong>g efforts for wild Oryza species<br />
<strong>in</strong> South Vietnam have concentrated on the Mekong Delta,<br />
especially <strong>in</strong> Dong Thap Muoi.<br />
Oryza offic<strong>in</strong>alis (CC) can be found at the edge of fruit<br />
orchards or <strong>in</strong> the shade of citrus plantations (Tien Giang and<br />
Can Tho prov<strong>in</strong>ces), and <strong>in</strong> mangroves <strong>in</strong> Ca Mau pen<strong>in</strong>sula.<br />
O. offic<strong>in</strong>alis has a wide range of resistance to pests. Oryza<br />
nivara (AA) is an annual species that has been exploited for<br />
its resistance to virus disease. Many years ago, it was found <strong>in</strong><br />
Dong Thap Muoi. However, it is now found only <strong>in</strong> Ho Lac<br />
(High Plateau of Vietnam).<br />
Many populations of Oryza rufipogon, a perennial species<br />
(AA), have been found <strong>in</strong> Vietnam, from north to south,<br />
with very diverse populations, especially <strong>in</strong> the Mekong Delta.<br />
One hundred sixty populations were identified by four primers<br />
designed through a centromere mapp<strong>in</strong>g program (Fig. 1).<br />
Widespread and well-established populations of O. rufipogon<br />
(perennial), O. nivara (annual), and “spontanea” (weedy) rice<br />
can be found along borders of rivers and canals of the delta,<br />
and sometimes <strong>in</strong> rice fields or marshes.<br />
Among populations of O. rufipogon, 12% and 5% of the<br />
populations were scored 1 and 3 (resistant), respectively, for<br />
brown planthopper reaction. In the case of O. offic<strong>in</strong>alis, 10%<br />
were scored 1 and 13% were scored 3 (resistant). It is considered<br />
a good donor for brown planthopper resistance and has<br />
been successfully exploited <strong>in</strong> our breed<strong>in</strong>g program (Buu et<br />
al 1997). O. rufipogon is also considered a source that can<br />
control acid sulfate tolerance and blast resistance. Of the populations,<br />
39%, 40%, and 6% showed their blast resistance with<br />
scores of 0, 1, and 3, respectively.<br />
In the case of traditional cultivars, more than 1,800 accessions<br />
are conserved at CLRRI. The average gene diversity<br />
<strong>in</strong>dex (H) was highest among the landrace populations orig<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g<br />
from the High Plateau (0.276), followed by northern<br />
areas (0.259), the Central Coast (0.254), and the Mekong Delta<br />
(0.228), through isozyme analysis (Buu et al 1997). Four ge-<br />
216 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101112 13141516 1718 192021 22<br />
23 24 25 26 27 2829 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42<br />
Fig. 1. Polymorphism <strong>in</strong> wild species detected with primer S3A9 (201/65).<br />
Lanes 4–8: Oryza rufipogon population <strong>in</strong> Dong Thap Muoi; lanes 13–15: O.<br />
nivara; lanes 24–30: O. offic<strong>in</strong>alis population from Mekong Delta.<br />
netic clusters were identified by Tocher and Mahalonobis methods<br />
based on morphological traits. Float<strong>in</strong>g rice cultivars <strong>in</strong><br />
the Mekong Delta (cluster I) are closer to Oryza rufipogon.<br />
Cluster II <strong>in</strong>cluded local rice accessions with salt tolerance<br />
collected from coastal areas. Cluster III <strong>in</strong>cluded deepwater<br />
rice collected from the western region of the Bassac River with<br />
improved plant type. Cluster IV was composed of early-monsoon<br />
rice cultivars without photosensitivity.<br />
The classification of rice germplasm through random<br />
amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) showed two major clusters<br />
and many subclusters that provide useful <strong>in</strong>formation for<br />
select<strong>in</strong>g parents <strong>in</strong> the development of an <strong>in</strong>tercluster cross<strong>in</strong>g<br />
program. Upland rice landraces such as Jo Ahn and Koi<br />
Ame were classified <strong>in</strong> the same cluster. Glut<strong>in</strong>ous rice varieties<br />
such as Nep Som and Nep Oc have the same subcluster as<br />
deepwater rice <strong>in</strong> the Mekong Delta such as Nam Vang and<br />
Lua Lem Lun. Glut<strong>in</strong>ous float<strong>in</strong>g rice Nep Co Ba was classified<br />
<strong>in</strong> the same cluster as normal glut<strong>in</strong>ous rice Nep Cai Hai<br />
Duong.<br />
Some cultivars were successfully exploited <strong>in</strong> the CLRRI<br />
breed<strong>in</strong>g program because of their significant values of genetic<br />
distance such as Bong Huong, Lua Thom, and Nep Thom<br />
compared with exotic materials; however, germplasm use <strong>in</strong><br />
the gene bank is still very low (less than 0.3%). New varieties<br />
released through this approach were OM2031 (Thai Lan/Bong<br />
Huong) and AS996 (IR64/O. rufipogon).<br />
DNA survey for bacterial blight resistance<br />
A set of 67 accessions was used to evaluate l<strong>in</strong>es with bacterial<br />
leaf blight (BB) resistance by DNA markers. Genotypes<br />
with stable BB resistance (e.g., Nep Hoa Vang, Bong Trang,<br />
and Ba Le) have been developed <strong>in</strong> Vietnam from such<br />
phenotyp<strong>in</strong>g, and others have often expressed no stability for<br />
the resistance (Buu et al 1997). A survey to collect BB isolates<br />
has been used s<strong>in</strong>ce 1997 from North to South Vietnam.<br />
The isolates were divided <strong>in</strong>to seven groups based on their<br />
pathogenicity. IRBB1, IRBB2, IRBB11, K<strong>in</strong>maze, and TN1<br />
were susceptible to all isolates. Resistant plants had a 1,500-<br />
bp band and susceptible plants a 1,000-bp band. Giau Dumont,<br />
Ba Ren, and Trang Lun (deepwater rice); Nang Tri (float<strong>in</strong>g<br />
rice); Ba Tuc, Giong Doi, and Koi Bo Teng (upland rice) were<br />
predicted to be resistant to BB (xa5). Marker-assisted selection<br />
could simplify the process of comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the recessive xa5<br />
resistance gene with other dom<strong>in</strong>ant BB resistance genes that<br />
have overlapp<strong>in</strong>g effects or race specificities (Blair and<br />
McCouch 1997). Useful molecular markers and near-isogenic<br />
l<strong>in</strong>es (NILs) carry<strong>in</strong>g a s<strong>in</strong>gle resistance gene are available.<br />
IRBB3, IRBB4, IRBB5, IRBB6, and IRBB8 <strong>in</strong>dicated resistance<br />
to isolates collected <strong>in</strong> both North and South Vietnam.<br />
Deepwater rice cultivars Trang Lun, Trang Phuoc, and Lua<br />
Mua 16, which conta<strong>in</strong> the genes xa5 and xa13 accord<strong>in</strong>g to a<br />
DNA survey, showed their stable resistance to BB <strong>in</strong> the monsoon<br />
season of the delta. Promis<strong>in</strong>g high-yield<strong>in</strong>g varieties from<br />
crosses <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g donor genes with BB resistance were also<br />
evaluated. Released varieties such as OM997, OM1490, and<br />
OM1723 are resistant to most isolates from the north but not<br />
to isolates from the south. Resistance based on major and m<strong>in</strong>or<br />
genes, or gene pyramid<strong>in</strong>g, should be considered <strong>in</strong> further<br />
rice breed<strong>in</strong>g programs.<br />
Molecular markers, QTL mapp<strong>in</strong>g, and marker-assisted selection 217
M 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 M<br />
Fig. 2. Digested PCR products with HaeIII of traditional rice cultivars at locus RG64 to<br />
detect Pi-2 gene (lane 1: CO39, susceptible: lane 2: C10151, resistant).<br />
DNA survey on blast resistance<br />
The selected RILs (C101A51) from a cross between 5173 (Pi2<br />
gene) and CO39 l<strong>in</strong>ked to RG64 were added to the set for<br />
blast resistance, with a genetic distance of 2.8 cM, located on<br />
chromosome 6. A sequence-tagged site (STS) was generated<br />
and PCR products were digested with HaeIII. The resistant<br />
genotypes had a 750-bp band and the susceptible genotypes<br />
had a 650-bp band (Fig. 2). Resistant landraces were predicted<br />
by the marker as Nho Vang, Nho Thuoc Co, Ong Kho, Soc<br />
Nau, Trang Chum, and Tau Huong (ra<strong>in</strong>fed genotypes), along<br />
with Nang Tri and Chet Cut (float<strong>in</strong>g genotypes) (Buu et al<br />
1997). Segregants of crosses <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g these donor materials<br />
were also evaluated with the STS, simultaneously. For<br />
phenotyp<strong>in</strong>g, rice blast isolates have been collected <strong>in</strong> the delta<br />
s<strong>in</strong>ce 1996. They were classified <strong>in</strong>to four pathogenic races,<br />
and the highest virulence was recognized <strong>in</strong> race 106.4. Among<br />
1,150 landrace accessions screened for blast, 46 accessions<br />
showed stable resistance, such as Te Tep, Sa Mo Ran, Tep Sai<br />
Gon, Gie Noi, and Ba Le. Their resistance was detected by<br />
STS markers. Genes for resistance <strong>in</strong> Te Tep controll<strong>in</strong>g blast<br />
were determ<strong>in</strong>ed to be three dom<strong>in</strong>ant genes and one recessive<br />
gene; <strong>in</strong> Gie Noi and Ba Le, two dom<strong>in</strong>ant <strong>in</strong>hibitory genes<br />
controlled resistance (Buu et al 1992).<br />
DNA survey for brown planthopper resistance<br />
Population trends of brown planthopper (BPH) <strong>in</strong> the Mekong<br />
Delta <strong>in</strong> five recent years were reviewed and its virulence to<br />
rice varieties was exam<strong>in</strong>ed by a seed-box screen<strong>in</strong>g test (Chau<br />
1998). The BPH population <strong>in</strong> the delta is a mixture of biotypes<br />
2 and 3, which are dist<strong>in</strong>ct from those <strong>in</strong> the north and<br />
Central Coastal areas. Of the dist<strong>in</strong>ct O. offic<strong>in</strong>alis populations<br />
collected <strong>in</strong> the delta, 23% showed resistance to the new<br />
BPH population. Of the thousands of landraces screened, 9%<br />
are resistant to the old BPH population (1980-90) and none to<br />
the new BPH population. A DNA survey was simultaneously<br />
carried out to detect the BPH resistance gene among landraces<br />
and wild rice species.<br />
Two pairs of primer RG457 were used. An STS was generated<br />
and PCR products digested with H<strong>in</strong>fI and AluI. Two<br />
<strong>in</strong>trogression l<strong>in</strong>es (IR65482-4-136 and IR65842-17-511) resistant<br />
to BPH biotypes 1 and 3 were selected for BC 2 F 4 of the<br />
cross IR31917-45-3-2/O. australiensis (acc. 100882). DNA<br />
of the F 2 population from IR54742/IR31917 was assessed<br />
through PCR amplification us<strong>in</strong>g primer pair RG457RL/FL.<br />
The band<strong>in</strong>g pattern of the 37 F 2 <strong>in</strong>dividuals could be classified<br />
<strong>in</strong>to homozygote for the IR54742-type marker with the<br />
size of 300-, 250-, and 200-bp fragments, homozygote for the<br />
IR31917-type marker with the size of 500- and 200-bp fragments,<br />
and heterozygotes display<strong>in</strong>g both fragments.<br />
QTL analysis for salt tolerance<br />
In the Mekong Delta, sal<strong>in</strong>e coastal soils cover approximately<br />
703,000 ha (Buu et al 1995). Salt <strong>in</strong>trusion occurs from December<br />
to May. Efforts have been made to identify a parameter<br />
that could be used as the criterion for mass screen<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
Parameters generally proposed are leaf <strong>in</strong>jury rate at the seedl<strong>in</strong>g<br />
stage, sterility after head<strong>in</strong>g, and Na + /K + ratio <strong>in</strong> shoots<br />
under sal<strong>in</strong>e conditions (Buu et al 1995). Selection efficiency<br />
for sal<strong>in</strong>ity tolerance under field conditions rema<strong>in</strong>s very low<br />
because of stress heterogeneity and the presence of other soilrelated<br />
stresses. Two or more genes (quantitative) that significantly<br />
<strong>in</strong>teract with the environment govern salt tolerance.<br />
Us<strong>in</strong>g F 6 RIL populations from the cross Tesanai 2/CB, one<br />
QTL for survival days for salt tolerance was detected on chromosome<br />
5 (L<strong>in</strong> Hong Xuan 1995). Another QTL was also detected<br />
on chromosome 10 for salt tolerance <strong>in</strong> the same cross<br />
(Shahid Masood 1997).<br />
Considerable genetic variation has been reported <strong>in</strong> sal<strong>in</strong>ity<br />
tolerance among rice varieties. The salt tolerance of Nona<br />
Bokra is greatest at the seedl<strong>in</strong>g and vegetative stages, Pokkali<br />
is more tolerant at the reproductive stage and less sensitive to<br />
photoperiod (Senadhira 1987), and Doc Do and Doc Phung<br />
were considered as salt-tolerant donors <strong>in</strong> Vietnam (Buu et al<br />
1995). Among 418 local rice accessions screened under salt<br />
stress of 6–12 dS m –1 , 44 accessions were tolerant, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Nang Co Do, Soc Nau (Buu et al 1995), Doc Do, Doc Phung,<br />
Trai May, Ca Dung Trang, etc.<br />
Progress <strong>in</strong> rice breed<strong>in</strong>g for improved salt tolerance at<br />
CLRRI has been based on the identification of a major gene<br />
controll<strong>in</strong>g salt tolerance <strong>in</strong> rice at the vegetative and reproductive<br />
stage. An F 2 population was developed from IR28/<br />
218 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
Tesanai<br />
CB<br />
Marker<br />
Segregat<strong>in</strong>g RI <strong>in</strong>dividuals<br />
Fig. 3. Segregation of RFLP marker C178 (chromosome 1) <strong>in</strong> a recomb<strong>in</strong>ant <strong>in</strong>bred (RI) population<br />
of Tesanai 2/CB to detect the salt-tolerance gene.<br />
Doc Phung. Another population of 108 RI l<strong>in</strong>es was derived<br />
from a cross between Tesanai 2 from Ch<strong>in</strong>a (tolerant variety)<br />
and CB from the U.S. (susceptible). The RILs were evaluated<br />
for seedl<strong>in</strong>g survival days (SD), dry root weight, dry shoot<br />
weight, Na + and K + accumulation, and Na + /K + ratio <strong>in</strong> culture<br />
solution (EC = 12 dS m –1 ). RFLP and microsatellite markers<br />
of this population were used to detect the l<strong>in</strong>kage to the target<br />
traits (Fig. 3).<br />
The 31 microsatellite markers and 74 RFLP markers were<br />
assigned to a l<strong>in</strong>kage group (Fig. 4). Although there are a few<br />
gaps of more than 50 cM, the l<strong>in</strong>kage map had a total map<br />
length of 2,340.50 cM. The average <strong>in</strong>terval size was 21.68<br />
cM. RFLP analysis showed little polymorphism. Three<br />
microsatellite markers were tightly l<strong>in</strong>ked with sal<strong>in</strong>ity tolerance:<br />
RM209 and RM214 (chr. 11), and RM240 (chr. 2). Four<br />
QTLs were identified for seedl<strong>in</strong>g survival days, one QTL for<br />
dry shoot weight, two QTLs for dry root weight, one QTL for<br />
Na + absorption, one QTL for K + absorption, and four QTLs<br />
for Na + /K + ratio. The proportion of phenotypic variation expla<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
by each QTL ranged from 5.2% to 11.6% for SD and<br />
from 4.8% to 14.4% for morphological characters and Na +<br />
and K + accumulation.<br />
References<br />
Blair MW, McCouch SR. 1997. Microsatellite and sequence tagged<br />
site markers diagnostic for rice bacterial leaf blight resistance<br />
gene xa-5. Theor. Appl. Genet. 95:174-184.<br />
Buu BC, Loan LC, Bay ND, Tao NV. 1992. Collection and evaluation<br />
of rice germplasm <strong>in</strong> Mekong Delta. Vietnam Agric. Food<br />
Stuff J. 357(3):90-92. (With English summary.)<br />
Buu BC, Lang NT, Tao PB, Bay ND. 1995. <strong>Rice</strong> breed<strong>in</strong>g research<br />
strategy <strong>in</strong> the Mekong Delta. In: Fragile lives <strong>in</strong> fragile ecosystems.<br />
Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs of the <strong>International</strong> <strong>Rice</strong> Research Conference.<br />
Los Baños (Philipp<strong>in</strong>es): <strong>International</strong> <strong>Rice</strong> Research<br />
Institute. p 739-755.<br />
Buu BC, Tao NV, Lang NT. 1997. <strong>Rice</strong> germplasm conservation. In:<br />
CLRRI Ann. Rep., Agric. Publ., Vietnam. p 9-16.<br />
Chang TT. 1976. Exploitation and survey <strong>in</strong> rice. In: Frankel OH,<br />
Hawkes JG, editors. Crop genetic resources for today and tomorrow.<br />
Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press. p 159-<br />
165.<br />
Chau LM. 1998. Fluctuation and virulence of brown plant hopper<br />
population <strong>in</strong> the Mekong Delta. OMon<strong>Rice</strong> 6:63-75.<br />
L<strong>in</strong> Hong Xuan.1995. Mapp<strong>in</strong>g of QTL for salt tolerance <strong>in</strong> rice<br />
(Oryza sativa L.) via molecular markers. Ok<strong>in</strong>awa Subtropical<br />
Station, JIRCAS 4:240-265.<br />
Senadhira D. 1987. Sal<strong>in</strong>ity as a constra<strong>in</strong>t to <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g rice production<br />
<strong>in</strong> Asia. Paper presented at workshop on ma<strong>in</strong>tenance<br />
of life support species <strong>in</strong> Asia Pacific Region, 4-7 April 1987.<br />
Shahid Masood M. 1997. Identification and evaluation of sal<strong>in</strong>ity<br />
tolerance <strong>in</strong> rice (Oryza sativa L.) us<strong>in</strong>g molecular markers.<br />
Ok<strong>in</strong>awa Subtropical Station, JIRCAS 6:121-135.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ address: Cuu Long Delta <strong>Rice</strong> Research Institute (CLRRI),<br />
Omon, Cantho, Vietnam.<br />
Acknowledgments: Thanks are due to the Rockefeller Foundation<br />
for support<strong>in</strong>g the rice biotechnology project at CLRRI, Dr.<br />
D.S. Brar for help<strong>in</strong>g and supply<strong>in</strong>g his breed<strong>in</strong>g materials,<br />
and Drs. G.S. Khush, N<strong>in</strong>g Huang, and Zhikang Li for their<br />
advice and guidance.<br />
Molecular markers, QTL mapp<strong>in</strong>g, and marker-assisted selection 219
cM<br />
43.0<br />
16.5<br />
9.0<br />
6.9<br />
28.8<br />
15.6<br />
7.7<br />
10.8<br />
1.0<br />
19.5<br />
26.9<br />
40.0<br />
34.1<br />
(1) RM212<br />
(2) C86<br />
(3) R2417<br />
(4)<br />
(5)<br />
C1370<br />
RM227<br />
(6) C955<br />
(7) C178<br />
(8) R210<br />
(9)<br />
(10)<br />
RM220<br />
RM81A<br />
(11) RM24<br />
(12) C122<br />
(13) C970<br />
(14) C112<br />
45.3<br />
0.5<br />
00.0<br />
15.7<br />
11.9<br />
66.1<br />
7.2<br />
39.2<br />
2.8<br />
2.8<br />
1.4<br />
12.6<br />
(15) RM240<br />
(16) R1643<br />
(17) R2510<br />
(18) R26<br />
(19) C560<br />
(20) C747<br />
(21) RM211<br />
(22) RM233<br />
(23) RM234<br />
(24)<br />
(25)<br />
RM207<br />
RM208<br />
(26) RM213<br />
43.0<br />
4.0<br />
40.4<br />
9.4<br />
14.0<br />
38.7<br />
10.3<br />
13.6<br />
5.3<br />
33.1<br />
Chr. 3<br />
(28) C1488<br />
(29) RM227<br />
(30) RM231<br />
(31) R250<br />
(32) C746<br />
(33) R19<br />
(34) C516<br />
(35) R2170<br />
(36) C63<br />
(37) C563<br />
(38) R3156<br />
50.2<br />
34.8<br />
33.1<br />
26.7<br />
Chr. 4<br />
(39) C891<br />
(40) R2373<br />
(41) C734<br />
(42) C445<br />
(43) C1016<br />
Chr. 1<br />
(27) G227<br />
Chr. 2<br />
30.7<br />
9.0<br />
12.0<br />
57.6<br />
Chr. 5<br />
(44) R521<br />
(45)<br />
(46)<br />
R2558<br />
R372<br />
(47) R2289<br />
(48) RM31<br />
(49) R2147<br />
12.6 (58) C39<br />
7.7<br />
(50) R2171<br />
(51) R2123<br />
32.0<br />
32.8<br />
(59) R3089<br />
18.0<br />
(52) R1952<br />
(60) R1440<br />
17.1<br />
20.1<br />
(61) RM214<br />
(53) RM226<br />
19.0<br />
37.7<br />
(54) RM217<br />
17.8<br />
(55) RM204<br />
2.7<br />
(62) R1789<br />
(63) C596<br />
37.7<br />
Chr. 7<br />
47.8<br />
(56) C358<br />
(57) R1167<br />
12.6<br />
27.6<br />
30.3<br />
10.2<br />
27.0<br />
11.2<br />
2.1<br />
50.9<br />
(64) RM25<br />
(65) RM223<br />
(66) RM210<br />
(67) C347<br />
(68) G1073<br />
(69) R2662<br />
(70) R1963<br />
(71) C1121<br />
Chr. 6<br />
Chr. 8<br />
(72) R902<br />
22.1<br />
18.4<br />
11.2<br />
12.1<br />
14.0<br />
39.9<br />
19.5<br />
18.1<br />
8.4<br />
10.2<br />
Chr. 9<br />
(73) C506<br />
(74) RM215<br />
(75) RM201<br />
(75) RM205<br />
(77) RM219<br />
(78) RM242<br />
(79) C711<br />
(80) C1454<br />
(81) C397<br />
(82) R1751<br />
(83) R2538<br />
47.8<br />
51.0<br />
44.1<br />
18.7<br />
Survival days (SD) Shoot wt. Root wt.<br />
Na + K + Na + /K + ratio<br />
(84) RM216<br />
(85) R2174<br />
(86) RM228<br />
(87) R716<br />
(88) C1286<br />
Chr. 10<br />
50.9<br />
36.8<br />
27.0<br />
34.5<br />
10.1<br />
30.2<br />
11.0<br />
10.4<br />
23.0<br />
5.0<br />
(99) R728<br />
(100) RM224<br />
(101) RM202<br />
(102) RM206<br />
(103) RM209<br />
(104) G257<br />
(105) G320<br />
(106) C535<br />
(107) C477<br />
(108) C1506<br />
(109) C950<br />
50.9<br />
3.3<br />
6.0<br />
12.3<br />
87.6<br />
11.0<br />
28.1<br />
Chr. 12<br />
(101) RM235<br />
(102) C901<br />
(103) C443<br />
(104) R1684<br />
(105) G24<br />
(106) R2375<br />
(107) G2140<br />
(108) R542<br />
60.3<br />
(110) C50<br />
Chr. 11<br />
Fig. 4. QTLs for salt tolerance mapped us<strong>in</strong>g recomb<strong>in</strong>ant <strong>in</strong>bred l<strong>in</strong>es derived from a cross between Tesanai 2 (tolerant) and CB (susceptible).<br />
220 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
Convert<strong>in</strong>g rice RFLP markers to PCR-based markers<br />
by the dCAPS method<br />
T. Komori, T. Yamamoto, and N. Nitta<br />
We studied the use of the dCAPS method <strong>in</strong> rice, whose genome is about four times larger than that of Arabidopsis thaliana.<br />
Results <strong>in</strong>dicated that the dCAPS method would be of great help <strong>in</strong> develop<strong>in</strong>g PCR-based markers <strong>in</strong> rice. Results are<br />
presented on how to develop dCAPS markers, especially for design<strong>in</strong>g mismatched primers.<br />
CAPS (cleaved amplified polymorphic sequence) markers are<br />
advantageous <strong>in</strong> genetic analyses for several reasons: (1) only<br />
nanogram quantities of DNA are required as a template, (2)<br />
no tedious Southern hybridization is required, and (3) results<br />
are highly reliable. The existence of a polymorphism-produc<strong>in</strong>g<br />
restriction site difference between varieties is essential for<br />
develop<strong>in</strong>g a CAPS marker. Although s<strong>in</strong>gle nucleotide polymorphism<br />
is one of the most common classes of DNA polymorphism,<br />
the majority of s<strong>in</strong>gle-base changes produce no<br />
restriction site difference and thus do not serve the purpose of<br />
develop<strong>in</strong>g CAPS markers. Recent research (Michaels and<br />
Amas<strong>in</strong>o 1998, Neff et al 1998) has revealed that s<strong>in</strong>gle-base<br />
changes produc<strong>in</strong>g no restriction site difference can be used <strong>in</strong><br />
develop<strong>in</strong>g new markers by means of the dCAPS (derived<br />
CAPS) method <strong>in</strong> Arabidopsis thaliana.<br />
As a model case, conversion of RFLP marker C81 to a<br />
dCAPS marker was attempted.<br />
Sequence comparison<br />
The nucleotide sequence of RFLP marker probe C81 was determ<strong>in</strong>ed,<br />
and a set of polymerase cha<strong>in</strong> reaction (PCR) primers<br />
(F and R) was designed to amplify the correspond<strong>in</strong>g genomic<br />
region. When PCR was conducted with genomic DNA<br />
of rice varieties, Asom<strong>in</strong>ori and IR24, 315-bp-long PCR products<br />
were obta<strong>in</strong>ed. These products were purified by gel electrophoresis<br />
and used for direct sequenc<strong>in</strong>g. One s<strong>in</strong>gle-base<br />
change was found.<br />
Development of a dCAPS marker<br />
To develop a dCAPS marker, five mismatched primers were<br />
designed (Fig. 1). Each primer was comb<strong>in</strong>ed with the R primer<br />
and PCR was conducted us<strong>in</strong>g genomic DNA. Cycl<strong>in</strong>g conditions<br />
were 94 °C for 2 m<strong>in</strong>, followed by 35 cycles of 94 °C for<br />
30 sec, 58 °C for 30 sec, and 72 °C for 30 sec. The extension<br />
of the f<strong>in</strong>al cycle was prolonged to 2.5 m<strong>in</strong>. TaKaRa ExTaq TM<br />
was used as the DNA polymerase. The PCR product was treated<br />
with EcoRI and separated by electrophoresis on 3%<br />
MetaPhor TM agarose (FMC BioProducts) gel.<br />
When F 3 , F 4 , or F 5 primer was used, the expected polymorphism<br />
was observed; the IR24 product was digested with<br />
EcoRI, and Asom<strong>in</strong>ori product was not. In contrast, when F 1<br />
or F 2 primer was used, no polymorphism was observed. A sequence<br />
analysis of each PCR product demonstrated that the<br />
mismatch <strong>in</strong>corporated <strong>in</strong>to F 1 and F 2 primers was repaired<br />
dur<strong>in</strong>g PCR amplification, probably because of the proofread<strong>in</strong>g<br />
activity of TaKaRa ExTaq TM . Our results contrast with those<br />
of Michaels and Amas<strong>in</strong>o (1998), who reported that mismatches<br />
at the first or second base from the 3′ end of primers<br />
would be preferable. The difference between their results and<br />
ours might be due to the PCR conditions, especially the polymerase<br />
used. In fact, we developed one dCAPS marker particular<br />
for the polymerase. When TaKaRa Taq TM , which lacks<br />
the proofread<strong>in</strong>g activity, is used, polymorphism is shown as<br />
expected. When TaKaRa ExTaq TM is used, the expected polymorphism<br />
is not evident. The polymorphic pattern may change<br />
depend<strong>in</strong>g on the polymerase used.<br />
Apply<strong>in</strong>g the dCAPS method<br />
It was shown that the dCAPS method could be applied to rice<br />
genetic analysis. This method can potentially use any s<strong>in</strong>gle<br />
nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) for develop<strong>in</strong>g a PCR-based<br />
marker, although some <strong>in</strong>genious devices might be needed <strong>in</strong><br />
some cases. Figure 2 shows a typical example of such a case.<br />
Two tactics are employed. One is disrupt<strong>in</strong>g redundant MboI<br />
sites that exist <strong>in</strong> the region to be amplified and that would<br />
make it difficult to detect the polymorphism clearly (Fig. 2, F<br />
primer). The other is creat<strong>in</strong>g an MboI site that results <strong>in</strong> the<br />
susceptibility of every PCR product to MboI and thus is useful<br />
for avoid<strong>in</strong>g misgenotyp<strong>in</strong>g caused by <strong>in</strong>correct experimental<br />
procedures (Fig. 2, R primer).<br />
References<br />
Michaels SD, Amas<strong>in</strong>o RM. 1998. A robust method for detect<strong>in</strong>g<br />
s<strong>in</strong>gle-nucleotide changes as polymorphic markers by PCR.<br />
Plant J. 14:381-385.<br />
Neff MM, Neff JD, Chory J, Pepper AE. 1998. dCAPS, a simple<br />
technique for the genetic analysis of s<strong>in</strong>gle nucleotide polymorphisms:<br />
experimental applications <strong>in</strong> Arabidopsis thaliana<br />
genetics. Plant J. 14:387-392.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ address: Orynova K.K., 700 Higashibara, Toyoda, Iwata,<br />
Shizuoka 438-0802, Japan.<br />
Molecular markers, QTL mapp<strong>in</strong>g, and marker-assisted selection 221
Genome (Asom<strong>in</strong>ori): ATTCAGAAGCCGATCGAGCAGGGTACCAGTAACTGCATGATGCTAATTTGA<br />
TTAGGAGCGCTCTATATATATTAATTAATCTATTATGTGTTTTTATTATGCTGAGCTCGTGTTAATCTGTCATCCG<br />
Genome (IR24): ATTCAGAAGCCGATCGAGCAGGGTACCAGTAACTGCATGATGCTAATTCGATTAG<br />
GAGCGCTCTATATATATTAATTAATCTATTATGTGTTTTTATTATGCTGAGCTCGTGTTAATCTGTCATCCG<br />
Primer (F1): GCAGGGTACCAGTAACTGCATGATGCG<br />
Primer (F2): CAGGGTACCAGTAACTGCATGATGCGA<br />
Primer (F3): AGGGTACCAGTAACTGCATGATGCGAA<br />
Primer (F4): GGGTACCAGTAACTGCATGATGCGAAT<br />
Primer (F5): GGTACCAGTAACTGCATGATGCGAATT<br />
Primer (R): CTCGAGCACAATTAGACAGTAGGC<br />
Expected PCR product<br />
F1, Asom<strong>in</strong>ori: CAGGGTACCAGTAACTGCATGATGCGAATTTGATTAGGAGCGCTCTATATATATTAAT<br />
TAATCTATTATGTGTTTTTATTATGCTGAGCTCGTGTTAATCTGTCATCCG<br />
F1, IR24: GCAGGGTACCAGTAACTGCATGATGCGAATTCGATTAGGAGCGCTCTATATATATTAATTA<br />
ATCTATTATGTGTTTTTATTATGCTGAGCTCGTGTTAATCTGTCATCCG<br />
F2, Asom<strong>in</strong>ori: CAGGGTACCAGTAACTGCATGATGCGAATTTGATTAGGAGCGCTCTATATATATTAAT<br />
TAATCTATTATGTGTTTTTATTATGCTGAGCTCGTGTTAATCTGTCATCCG<br />
F2, IR24: CAGGGTACCAGTAACTGCATGATGCGAATTCGATTAGGAGCGCTCTATATATATTAATTAA<br />
TCTATTATGTGTTTTTATTATGCTGAGCTCGTGTTAATCTGTCATCCG<br />
F3, Asom<strong>in</strong>ori: AGGGTACCAGTAACTGCATGATGCGAATTTGATTAGGAGCGCTCTATATATATTAATT<br />
AATCTATTATGTGTTTTTATTATGCTGAGCTCGTGTTAATCTGTCATCCG<br />
F3, IR24: AGGGTACCAGTAACTGCATGATGCGAATTCGATTAGGAGCGCTCTATATATATTAATTAAT<br />
CTATTATGTGTTTTTATTATGCTGAGCTCGTGTTAATCTGTCATCCG<br />
F4, Asom<strong>in</strong>ori: GGGTACCAGTAACTGCATGATGCGAATTTGATTAGGAGCGCTCTATATATATTAATT<br />
AATCTATTATGTGTTTTTATTATGCTGAGCTCGTGTTAATCTGTCATCCG<br />
F4, IR24: GGGTACCAGTAACTGCATGATGCGAATTCGATTAGGAGCGCTCTATATATATTAATTAATC<br />
TATTATGTGTTTTTATTATGCTGAGCTCGTGTTAATCTGTCATCCG<br />
F5, Asom<strong>in</strong>ori: GGTACCAGTAACTGCATGATGCGAATTTGATTAGGAGCGCTCTATATATATTAATTA<br />
ATCTATTATGTGTTTTTATTATGCTGAGCTCGTGTTAATCTGTCATCCG<br />
F5, IR24: GGTACCAGTAACTGCATGATGCGAATTCGATTAGGAGCGCTCTATATATATTAATTAATC<br />
TATTATGTGTTTTTATTATGCTGAGCTCGTGTTAATCTGTCATCCG<br />
Actual PCR product<br />
F1, Asom<strong>in</strong>ori: GCAGGGTACCAGTAACTGCATGATGCTAATTTGATTAGGAGCGCTCTATATATATTAA<br />
TTAATCTATTATGTGTTTTTATTATGCTGAGCTCGTGTTAATCTGTCATCCG<br />
F1, IR24: GCAGGGTACCAGTAACTGCATGATGCTAATTCGATTAGGAGCGCTCTATATATATTAATTA<br />
ATCTATTATGTGTTTTTATTATGCTGAGCTCGTGTTAATCTGTCATCCG<br />
F2, Asom<strong>in</strong>ori: CAGGGTACCAGTAACTGCATGATGCTAATTTGATTAGGAGCGCTCTATATATATTAAT<br />
TAATCTATTATGTGTTTTTATTATGCTGAGCTCGTGTTAATCTGTCATCCG<br />
F2, IR24: CAGGGTACCAGTAACTGCATGATGCTAATTCGATTAGGAGCGCTCTATATATATTAATTAAT<br />
CTATTATGTGTTTTTATTATGCTGAGCTCGTGTTAATCTGTCATCCG<br />
F3, Asom<strong>in</strong>ori: AGGGTACCAGTAACTGCATGATGCGAATTTGATTAGGAGCGCTCTATATATATTAATT<br />
AATCTATTATGTGTTTTTATTATGCTGAGCTCGTGTTAATCTGTCATCCG<br />
F3, IR24: AGGGTACCAGTAACTGCATGATGCGAATTCGATTAGGAGCGCTCTATATATATTAATTAAT<br />
CTATTATGTGTTTTTATTATGCTGAGCTCGTGTTAATCTGTCATCCG<br />
F4, Asom<strong>in</strong>ori: GGGTACCAGTAACTGCATGATGCGAATTTGATTAGGAGCGCTCTATATATATTAATTA<br />
ATCTATTATGTGTTTTTATTATGCTGAGCTCGTGTTAATCTGTCATCCG<br />
F4, IR24: GGGTACCAGTAACTGCATGATGCGAATTCGATTAGGAGCGCTCTATATATATTAATTAATCT<br />
ATTATGTGTTTTTATTATGCTGAGCTCGTGTTAATCTGTCATCCG<br />
F5, Asom<strong>in</strong>ori: GGTACCAGTAACTGCATGATGCGAATTTGATTAGGAGCGCTCTATATATATTAATTAA<br />
TCTATTATGTGTTTTTATTATGCTGAGCTCGTGTTAATCTGTCATCCG<br />
F5, IR24: GGTACCAGTAACTGCATGATGCGAATTCGATTAGGAGCGCTCTATATATATTAATTAATCTA<br />
TTATGTGTTTTTATTATGCTGAGCTCGTGTTAATCTGTCATCCG<br />
Fig. 1. Development of dCAPS marker C81 EcoRI. The nucleotide sequence of genomic<br />
DNA, the primers designed to create the dCAPS marker, and the PCR products<br />
are shown. The underl<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong>dicate an EcoRI site.<br />
222 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
Genome (Asom<strong>in</strong>ori):<br />
GGATCCAGATCGAGACCGCCAAGATCATCCGCGACCGCCTCCGCTGGTGC<br />
TACCGCATCGAGGGCGTCAACCACCACCAGAAGTGCCGCCACCTCGTCGACCAGTACCTCGAG<br />
GCCACCCGCGGCGTCGGATGGGGCAAGGACGCCCGCCCGCCGGAGCTGCACGGTCCGATGAG<br />
ATGATCC<br />
Genome (IR24):<br />
GGATCCAGATCGAGACCGCCAAGATCATCCGCGATCGCCTCCGCTGGTGCTAC<br />
CGCATCGAGGGCGTCAACCACCACCAGAAGTGCCGCCACCTCGTCGACCAGTACCTCGAG<br />
GCCACCCGCGGCGTCGGATGGGGCAAGGACGCCCGCCCTCCGGAGCTGCACGGTCCGATGAGATG<br />
ATCC<br />
Primer (F): TCCAGATGGAGACCGCCAATATCATCC<br />
Primer (R): CTAGACGTGCCAGGCTACTCTACTAGG<br />
PCR (Asom<strong>in</strong>ori): TCCAGATGGAGACCGCCAATATCATCCGCGACCGCCTCCGCTGGTGCTACCG<br />
CATCGAGGGCGTCAACCACCACCAGAAGTGCCGCCACCTCGTCGACCAGTACCTCGAGGCCAC<br />
CCGCGGCGTCGGATGGGGCAAGGACGCCCGCCCGCCGGATCTGCACGGTCCGATGAGATGAT<br />
CC<br />
PCR (IR24): TCCAGATGGAGACCGCCAATATCATCCGCGATCGCCTCCGCTGGTGCTACCGCATC<br />
GAGGGCGTCAACCACCACCAGAAGTGCCGCCACCTCGTCGACCAGTACCTCGAGGCCACCCGC<br />
GGCGTCGGATGGGGCAAGGACGCCCGCCCTCCGGATCTGCACGGTCCGATGAGATGATCC<br />
Fig. 2. A typical example for develop<strong>in</strong>g an ideal marker. The forward primer (F) has<br />
two mismatches to disrupt redundant MboI sites, and the reverse primer (R) has<br />
one mismatch to create an MboI site. Underl<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong>dicate MboI sites.<br />
DNA markers to assess genetic purity of rice hybrids<br />
R.V. Sonti, J. Yashitola, T. Thirumurugan, R.M. Sundaram, M.S. Ramesha, and N.P. Sarma<br />
Ensur<strong>in</strong>g hybrid purity is vital for hybrid rice technology. It is conventionally determ<strong>in</strong>ed by a grow-out test, a time-consum<strong>in</strong>g<br />
and costly method. A variety of DNA markers such as microsatellites, sequence tagged sites (STSs), and random amplified<br />
polymorphic DNAs (RAPDs) were used to dist<strong>in</strong>guish parental l<strong>in</strong>es and their hybrids. Parental l<strong>in</strong>es (A and R) and their hybrids<br />
<strong>in</strong> a set of four comb<strong>in</strong>ations were screened with 13 microsatellites, 10 STS markers, and 50 random primers. Several<br />
polymorphisms were identified after polymerase cha<strong>in</strong> reaction and electrophoresis on agarose gels. As both microsatellites<br />
and STS markers are codom<strong>in</strong>ant, the polymorphism detected between the parental l<strong>in</strong>es was used to establish hybridity. In<br />
the case of RAPDs, the dom<strong>in</strong>ant polymorphic bands observed <strong>in</strong> each parental l<strong>in</strong>e amplified by the same primer were useful<br />
to dist<strong>in</strong>guish it from its hybrid.<br />
One of the major constra<strong>in</strong>ts to the adoption of hybrid rice<br />
technology is the need to produce and ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> an adequate<br />
supply of homogeneous hybrid seed to farmers every season.<br />
The ma<strong>in</strong>tenance of a high level of genetic purity of hybrid<br />
seeds is imperative to exploit heterosis. Mao et al (1996) have<br />
estimated that for every 1% impurity <strong>in</strong> hybrid seed, a yield<br />
reduction of 100 kg ha –1 occurs. The purity of hybrid seed is<br />
conventionally assayed by a grow-out test (GOT) on a representative<br />
sample of seed to be marketed. The GOT is essentially<br />
based on morphological (phenotype) uniformity. The<br />
procedure is subjective as the expression of these traits can be<br />
<strong>in</strong>fluenced by environmental factors. Because of their phenotypic<br />
neutrality, DNA-based molecular markers can be used<br />
for a precise assessment of plant genotype (Joshi et al 1999).<br />
Examples of such markers are random amplified polymorphic<br />
DNAs (RAPDs), sequence tagged sites (STSs), microsatellites,<br />
and <strong>in</strong>ter simple sequence repeats (ISSRs).<br />
We exam<strong>in</strong>ed the utility of RAPDs, STSs, and<br />
microsatellites for assess<strong>in</strong>g the genetic purity of rice hybrids.<br />
Four rice hybrids and their parental l<strong>in</strong>es were analyzed to<br />
develop a marker system for assess<strong>in</strong>g genetic purity. This study<br />
describes the relative merits of these three types of markers<br />
and their suitability for assess<strong>in</strong>g the purity of hybrids as a<br />
substitute for the GOT.<br />
Materials and methods<br />
The rice parental l<strong>in</strong>es and their hybrids (<strong>in</strong> a set of four comb<strong>in</strong>ations)<br />
analyzed are given <strong>in</strong> Table 1. Genomic DNA was<br />
isolated from leaves of 18–20-day-old greenhouse-grown rice<br />
plants.<br />
A total of 50 random primers, 10 STSs, and 12<br />
microsatellite primers were used <strong>in</strong> the assay (see details <strong>in</strong><br />
Table 2). For the polymorphism survey, DNA samples (50 ng)<br />
were amplified <strong>in</strong> a reaction volume of 25 µL conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g 1X<br />
PCR buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 9.0, 1.5 mM MgCl 2 , 50<br />
mM KCl, and 0.01% gelat<strong>in</strong>), 0.2 mM of each dNTP, and 1 U<br />
of Taq DNA polymerase. Samples were overlaid with m<strong>in</strong>eral<br />
oil and polymerase cha<strong>in</strong> reaction (PCR) was carried out <strong>in</strong> a<br />
thermal cycler (Perk<strong>in</strong>-Elmer-480). PCR conditions <strong>in</strong> the<br />
Molecular markers, QTL mapp<strong>in</strong>g, and marker-assisted selection 223
Table 1. <strong>Rice</strong> hybrids analyzed for purity.<br />
Parental and hybrid l<strong>in</strong>e<br />
CMS l<strong>in</strong>es<br />
IR58025 A<br />
IR62829 A<br />
Restorer l<strong>in</strong>es<br />
MTU9992<br />
IR40750<br />
BR827-35<br />
Hybrids a<br />
APRH 2 (IR62829A/MTU9992)<br />
DRRH 1 (IR58025A/IR40750)<br />
CNRH 3 (IR62829A/Ajaya)<br />
Sahyadri (IR8025A/BR827-35)<br />
Source<br />
<strong>IRRI</strong><br />
Agricultural Research Station, Maruteru, India<br />
<strong>IRRI</strong><br />
<strong>IRRI</strong><br />
Agricultural Research Station, Maruteru, India<br />
Directorate of <strong>Rice</strong> Research, Hyderabad, India<br />
<strong>Rice</strong> Research Station, Ch<strong>in</strong>surah, India<br />
Regional Agricultural Research Station, Karjat, India<br />
a CMS and restorer l<strong>in</strong>es from which hybrids were obta<strong>in</strong>ed are <strong>in</strong>dicated <strong>in</strong> parentheses.<br />
Table 2. Frequency of heterozygosity at microsatellite and STS loci <strong>in</strong> rice hybrids.<br />
<strong>Rice</strong> varieties<br />
Frequency of heterozygosity<br />
CMS l<strong>in</strong>e Restorer l<strong>in</strong>e Hybrid RAPD a STS Microsatellite<br />
markers markers markers<br />
IR62829A MTU9992 APRH 2 3/50 0/10 2/12<br />
IR58025A IR40750 DRRH 1 1/50 1/10 3/12<br />
IR62829A Ajaya CNRH 3 3/50 1/10 5/12<br />
IR58025A BR827-35 Sahyadri 2/50 3/10 1/12<br />
a For the RAPD, one polymorphic band unique for each parent, which was co-amplified <strong>in</strong> the hybrid, was<br />
considered as a dist<strong>in</strong>guish<strong>in</strong>g polymorphic marker.<br />
polymorphism survey were as described <strong>in</strong> the orig<strong>in</strong>al references.<br />
Results<br />
Genomic DNA was isolated from two CMS l<strong>in</strong>es, four restorer<br />
l<strong>in</strong>es, and four hybrids that are commercially cultivated <strong>in</strong> different<br />
regions of India. Fifty random primers, 10 STSs, and 12<br />
microsatellite markers were used to analyze these l<strong>in</strong>es under<br />
conditions described earlier. Polymorphisms were detected<br />
after electrophoresis <strong>in</strong> 1.5% or 3.0% agarose gels, followed<br />
by sta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g with ethidium bromide.<br />
In RAPD analysis, multiple bands were observed <strong>in</strong> most<br />
of the parental l<strong>in</strong>es (Table 2). A primer amplify<strong>in</strong>g the polymorphic<br />
band(s) unique for each parent (CMS and restorer) of<br />
a hybrid comb<strong>in</strong>ation was selected and used to analyze the<br />
correspond<strong>in</strong>g hybrid. Even though many primers produced<br />
such polymorphisms, only five (OPV 6, OPV 7, OPV 12, OPZ<br />
5, and OPZ 17) produced reproducible co-amplification of the<br />
unique parent-specific bands <strong>in</strong> the hybrids.<br />
Ten STS markers were used for PCR analysis of parental<br />
l<strong>in</strong>es and hybrids (Fig. 1). As expected, only one allele was<br />
detected <strong>in</strong> a hybrid when the parents were monomorphic for a<br />
particular STS locus and two alleles (one allele per parent)<br />
were present <strong>in</strong> a hybrid when polymorphism was detected <strong>in</strong><br />
the correspond<strong>in</strong>g CMS and restorer l<strong>in</strong>es. Of the 10 STS<br />
markers analyzed, only three (pTA 248, F 8, and F 43) were<br />
polymorphic and the other markers were monomorphic for the<br />
l<strong>in</strong>es screened.<br />
In the case of microsatellites, five loci out of 12 (RM 1,<br />
RM 19, RM 21, RM 164, and RM 206) amplified polymorphic<br />
alleles <strong>in</strong> the parents (CMS and restorer) and these alleles<br />
were amplified codom<strong>in</strong>antly <strong>in</strong> the hybrids (Fig. 2). The rest<br />
of the microsatellite markers did not exhibit polymorphism<br />
between the parents.<br />
Discussion<br />
We used 50 random primers, 10 STS markers, and 12<br />
microsatellite markers to detect genetic polymorphism among<br />
two CMS l<strong>in</strong>es, four restorers, and four hybrids. Except for<br />
the parental comb<strong>in</strong>ation for the hybrid APRH 2 (with respect<br />
to STSs), at least one polymorphism was detected us<strong>in</strong>g these<br />
sets of markers for each parental comb<strong>in</strong>ation used to produce<br />
hybrids.<br />
Among the three marker systems studied, microsatellites<br />
and STSs appear to be the best choice for test<strong>in</strong>g the purity of<br />
rice hybrids because they show codom<strong>in</strong>ance of parental alleles<br />
<strong>in</strong> the hybrid. For RAPDs, even though many of the primers<br />
showed polymorphism between parental l<strong>in</strong>es, only a few<br />
showed amplification of the polymorphic bands <strong>in</strong> the correspond<strong>in</strong>g<br />
hybrid, and many bands observed <strong>in</strong> the parental l<strong>in</strong>es<br />
224 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
p M 1 2 3 bp M 1 2 3<br />
1,500<br />
1,000<br />
800<br />
500<br />
600<br />
200<br />
Fig. 1. Ethidium bromide-sta<strong>in</strong>ed electrophoretic profile of PCRamplified<br />
STS markers <strong>in</strong> CMS, hybrid, and restorer l<strong>in</strong>es—polymorphism<br />
between parental l<strong>in</strong>es (lanes 1 and 3) and a rice hybrid<br />
(lane 2). Molecular weight marker (lane M) used is a 100-bp<br />
DNA ladder.<br />
Fig. 2. Ethidium bromide-sta<strong>in</strong>ed electrophoretic profile of PCRamplified<br />
microsatellite markers <strong>in</strong> CMS, hybrid, and restorer<br />
l<strong>in</strong>es—polymorphism between parental l<strong>in</strong>es (lanes 1 and 3) and<br />
a rice hybrid (lane 2). Molecular weight marker (lane M) used is a<br />
100-bp DNA ladder.<br />
were not reproducibly amplified <strong>in</strong> the hybrids. This limits<br />
their utility for applications such as hybrid purity test<strong>in</strong>g. We<br />
have found that microsatellites and STSs, because of their reproducibility<br />
and robustness of amplification, are the ideal<br />
marker systems for test<strong>in</strong>g hybrid purity. Microsatellites are<br />
likely to be the markers of choice because there are at least<br />
351 well-distributed, polymorphic, and mapped microsatellite<br />
markers <strong>in</strong> rice (Temnykh et al 2000). This constitutes a large<br />
source of markers for detect<strong>in</strong>g polymorphism between parental<br />
l<strong>in</strong>es of hybrids.<br />
To assess purity through the GOT, a sample of 400 seeds<br />
is used from each seed lot (Verma 1996). A seed sample of the<br />
same size can be used <strong>in</strong> our DNA marker-based assay. We<br />
have standardized a simple and rapid method for DNA extraction<br />
from 5–7-day-old seedl<strong>in</strong>gs and the entire assay can be<br />
completed with<strong>in</strong> 14 days after harvest (data not shown). The<br />
assays can be completed <strong>in</strong> a modestly equipped laboratory at<br />
a cost of Rs 7,000 ($160; consumables only) for 400 seeds.<br />
Though this cost appears to be high, it is actually <strong>in</strong>significant<br />
compared with the amount spent <strong>in</strong> storage and the costs of<br />
the growth test. In addition, this assay provides much more<br />
accurate results.<br />
References<br />
Joshi SP, Ranjekar PK, Gupta VS. 1999. Molecular markers <strong>in</strong> plant<br />
genome analysis. Curr. Sci. 77:230-240.<br />
Mao CX, Virmani SS, Ish Kumar. 1996. Technological <strong>in</strong>novations<br />
to lower the costs of hybrid rice seed production. In: Virmani<br />
SS, Siddiq EA, Muralidharan K, editors. <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> hybrid<br />
rice technology. Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs of the Third <strong>International</strong> Symposium<br />
on Hybrid <strong>Rice</strong>, 14-16 Nov 1996, Hyderabad, India.<br />
Manila (Philipp<strong>in</strong>es): <strong>International</strong> <strong>Rice</strong> Research Institute.<br />
p 111-128.<br />
Temnykh S, Park WD, Ayres N, Cart<strong>in</strong>hour S, Hauck N, Lipovich L,<br />
Cho YG, Ishii T. 2000. Mapp<strong>in</strong>g and genome organization of<br />
microsatellite sequences <strong>in</strong> rice (Oryza sativa L.). Theor. Appl.<br />
Genet. 100:697-712.<br />
Verma MM. 1996. Procedures for grow-out test (GOT). Seed Tech.<br />
Newsl. 26:1-4.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’s addresses: R.V. Sonti and J. Yashitola, Centre for Cellular<br />
and Molecular Biology, Hyderabad 500 007, India; T.<br />
Thirumurugan, R.M. Sundaram, M.S. Ramesha, and N.P.<br />
Sarma, Directorate of <strong>Rice</strong> Research, Hyderabad 500 030,<br />
India.<br />
Molecular markers, QTL mapp<strong>in</strong>g, and marker-assisted selection 225
RAPD markers from mitochondrial DNA can dist<strong>in</strong>guish<br />
male sterile and fertile cytoplasm <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>dica rice<br />
D.L. Hong, M. Ichii, Y. Ohara, C.M. Zhao, and S. Taketa<br />
The total DNA of wild abortive (WA) cytoplasmic male sterile (CMS) l<strong>in</strong>e Zhenshan 97A and its ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>er Zhenshan 97B was<br />
extracted by the CTAB method. One hundred primers were used to screen random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) markers<br />
to dist<strong>in</strong>guish male sterile (A) and ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>er (B) plants at the seedl<strong>in</strong>g stage. Results showed that <strong>in</strong> Zhenshan 97A there was<br />
a 1,600-bp DNA fragment <strong>in</strong> the product amplified by primer OPA12; <strong>in</strong> Zhenshan 97 B, it was absent. Further, the 1,600-bp<br />
fragment was also found <strong>in</strong> WA-type CMS l<strong>in</strong>e Longtepu A and dwarf abortive (DA)-type CMS l<strong>in</strong>e Xieq<strong>in</strong>gzao A, and not found<br />
<strong>in</strong> their ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>er l<strong>in</strong>es Longtepu B and Xieq<strong>in</strong>gzao B. Also, the 1,600-bp fragment was not found <strong>in</strong> restorer l<strong>in</strong>e M<strong>in</strong>ghui 63<br />
(R). In the F 1<br />
and F 2<br />
of Zhenshan 97A/M<strong>in</strong>ghui 63, all plants had the 1,600-bp fragment. When mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA)<br />
was isolated from three pairs of A and B l<strong>in</strong>es and amplified by OPA12, results showed that the 1,600-bp fragment was found<br />
<strong>in</strong> the three male sterile l<strong>in</strong>es, and not <strong>in</strong> the three ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>er l<strong>in</strong>es. In DA-type CMS l<strong>in</strong>e Xieq<strong>in</strong>gzao A, two other fragments<br />
(1,000-bp and 700-bp) were found, except the 1,600-bp fragment. These results <strong>in</strong>dicated that the 1,600-bp fragment<br />
amplified by OPA12 was derived from male sterile cytoplasm, and can be used as a RAPD marker to dist<strong>in</strong>guish A and B plants<br />
at the seedl<strong>in</strong>g stage. The fragments amplified from mtDNA can be used to dist<strong>in</strong>guish between the WA-type and DA-type<br />
cytoplasm.<br />
Hybrid rice occupies about 50% of the total rice area <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a<br />
(Lu and Hong 1999). To maximize the use of heterosis, hybrid<br />
seeds supplied to farmers must be of high purity. Up to now,<br />
the method used to determ<strong>in</strong>e hybrid rice seed purity <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a<br />
is to plant sample seeds and <strong>in</strong>spect them at the head<strong>in</strong>g stage.<br />
Discrim<strong>in</strong>ation of ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>er and CMS plants can only be conducted<br />
at the head<strong>in</strong>g stage by observ<strong>in</strong>g anthers and pollens.<br />
Dist<strong>in</strong>guish<strong>in</strong>g ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>er and CMS l<strong>in</strong>es at the seedl<strong>in</strong>g stage<br />
is very useful <strong>in</strong> practice. Differences between CMS and their<br />
ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>er l<strong>in</strong>es exist <strong>in</strong> cytoplasm. CMS <strong>in</strong> rice is closely related<br />
to mitochondria (Yamaguchi and Kakiuchi 1983,<br />
Kadowaki et al 1986, Kadowaki and Harada 1989). In this<br />
paper, we report the results on the use of random amplified<br />
polymorphic DNA (RAPD) markers to dist<strong>in</strong>guish ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>er<br />
from CMS plants at the seedl<strong>in</strong>g stage, the segregation of the<br />
RAPD marker <strong>in</strong> the F 2 generation, and the orig<strong>in</strong> of the RAPD<br />
marker.<br />
Materials and methods<br />
Zhenshan 97A and Zhenshan 97B, Longtepu A and Longtepu<br />
B, Xieq<strong>in</strong>gzao A and Xieq<strong>in</strong>gzao B, restorer l<strong>in</strong>e M<strong>in</strong>ghui 63,<br />
and F 1 and F 2 of Zhenshan 97A /M<strong>in</strong>ghui 63 were used <strong>in</strong> this<br />
study.<br />
Total DNA was extracted by the CTAB method us<strong>in</strong>g<br />
0.5–0.8 g of green leaves for each sample. mtDNA was extracted<br />
us<strong>in</strong>g the method of Kadowaki et al (1986) with 15–30<br />
g of etiolated shoots.<br />
The PCR amplification solution (40 L) consisted of 10<br />
mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.3), 1.5 mM MgCl 2 , 50 mM KCl, gelat<strong>in</strong><br />
0.001%, 0.2 mM dNTP, 0.163 M primer, 0.5 unit Ampli Taq<br />
Gold, and 20 ng template DNA. PCR amplification was conducted<br />
us<strong>in</strong>g GeneAmp PCR System 2400 (Perk<strong>in</strong> Elmer,<br />
USA) under the follow<strong>in</strong>g conditions: 95 °C, 12 m<strong>in</strong>; one time;<br />
94 °C, 1 m<strong>in</strong>; 37 °C, 1 m<strong>in</strong>; 72 °C, 2 m<strong>in</strong>; 45 cycles; 72 °C, 5<br />
m<strong>in</strong>.<br />
Results<br />
Screen<strong>in</strong>g RAPD markers to dist<strong>in</strong>guish CMS<br />
and ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>er l<strong>in</strong>es<br />
Among 100 primers (OPA01–OPE20, Operon 10 mer.) used,<br />
13 did not amplify bands. Seventy primers amplified bands<br />
but no polymorphism between Zhenshan 97A and Zhenshan<br />
97B was observed. Seven primers amplified polymorphous<br />
bands, but only primer OPA12 showed stable polymorphism<br />
<strong>in</strong> different samples (replications). In Zhenshan 97A, OPA12<br />
can amplify a 1,600-base pair (bp) band, whereas <strong>in</strong> Zhenshan<br />
97B the 1,600-bp band was not found (Fig. 1). When total<br />
DNA of Longtepu A, Longtepu B, Xieq<strong>in</strong>gzao A, and<br />
Xieq<strong>in</strong>gzao B was used as a template and amplified by OPA12,<br />
the 1,600-bp band was found <strong>in</strong> Longtepu A and Xieq<strong>in</strong>gzao<br />
A but not <strong>in</strong> Longtepu B and Xieq<strong>in</strong>gzao B. It can be seen<br />
from the results that the 1,600-bp band can be used as a RAPD<br />
marker to dist<strong>in</strong>guish between WA-type CMS and ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>er<br />
plants, and to dist<strong>in</strong>guish between DA-type CMS and ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>er<br />
plants at the seedl<strong>in</strong>g stage.<br />
Characterization of the 1,600-bp band<br />
Total DNA of Zhenshan 97A, restorer l<strong>in</strong>e M<strong>in</strong>ghui 63, and F 1<br />
and F 2 plants of Zhenshan 97A/M<strong>in</strong>ghui 63 was used as a template<br />
and amplified by OPA12. Figure 2 shows that the 1,600-<br />
bp band was not found <strong>in</strong> M<strong>in</strong>ghui 63, but appeared <strong>in</strong> F 1 and<br />
all F 2 plants <strong>in</strong>vestigated, <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g that the band was derived<br />
from male sterile cytoplasm.<br />
Us<strong>in</strong>g mtDNA of the three pairs of CMS l<strong>in</strong>es and their<br />
ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>er l<strong>in</strong>es as a template and amplified by OPA12, it was<br />
found that the 1,600-bp band appeared <strong>in</strong> Zhenshan 97A,<br />
226 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
whereas <strong>in</strong> Zhenshan 97B no such band was found. In Longtepu<br />
A, only the 1,600-bp band was found, whereas <strong>in</strong> Longtepu B<br />
there was no 1,600-bp band but a 1,400-bp band was found. In<br />
Xieq<strong>in</strong>gzao A, except for the 1,600-bp band, two other bands<br />
(1,000 bp and 700 bp) were found, whereas <strong>in</strong> Xieq<strong>in</strong>gzao B<br />
there was only one 1,000-bp band (Fig. 3). These results <strong>in</strong>dicated<br />
that the 1,600-bp band was derived from the mtDNA of<br />
WA- and DA-type cytoplasm, and that bands other than the<br />
1,600-bp can be used to dist<strong>in</strong>guish between WA and DA cytoplasm.<br />
Discussion<br />
A<br />
M 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 N M<br />
bp<br />
1,600<br />
200<br />
Dur<strong>in</strong>g the study, we tried six anneal<strong>in</strong>g temperatures (32, 35,<br />
37, 39, 41, and 40 °C) and seven MgCl 2 concentrations (1.0,<br />
1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, and 4.0 mM) to study the specificity of<br />
the 1,600-bp band. It was found that, from 37 to 40 °C, and at<br />
1.0 and 1.5 mM, the 1,600-bp band appeared only <strong>in</strong> the male<br />
sterile l<strong>in</strong>es. With mtDNA as a template, we tried five k<strong>in</strong>ds of<br />
MgCl 2 concentrations (1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 3.0, and 4.0 mM) and<br />
found that the 1,600-bp band was clearest under 2.0 mM.<br />
The cost is about US$10 for one sample us<strong>in</strong>g the field<br />
<strong>in</strong>spection method. It will cost $800 to <strong>in</strong>spect 800 plants by<br />
us<strong>in</strong>g the RAPD marker. Apparently, the cost of the latter is<br />
B<br />
M 1 2 3 4 5 6 bp<br />
1,600<br />
200<br />
1,600<br />
1,400<br />
1,000<br />
700<br />
C<br />
1,600<br />
200<br />
Fig. 1. RAPD profile amplified by primer OPA12 us<strong>in</strong>g total DNA as<br />
template (37 °C). A = Zhenshan 97, B = Longtepu, C = Xieq<strong>in</strong>gzao,<br />
M = DNA size marker, 1–6 = <strong>in</strong>dividual plants of ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>er l<strong>in</strong>e,<br />
7–12 = <strong>in</strong>dividual plants of CMS l<strong>in</strong>e, N = negative control.<br />
Fig. 3. RAPD profile amplified by primer OPA12 us<strong>in</strong>g mitochondrial<br />
DNA as template. M = DNA size marker, 1 = Zhenshan 97A,<br />
2 = Zhenshan 97B, 3 = Longtepu A, 4 = Longtepu B, 5 =<br />
Xieq<strong>in</strong>gzao A, 6 = Xieq<strong>in</strong>gzao B.<br />
M 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 M bp<br />
1,600<br />
Fig. 2. RAPD profile amplified by<br />
primer OPA12 us<strong>in</strong>g total DNA as<br />
template (37 °C). 1 = Zhenshan<br />
97A, 2 = restorer l<strong>in</strong>e M<strong>in</strong>ghui<br />
63, 3 = F 1 plant of Zhenshan<br />
97A/M<strong>in</strong>ghui 63, 4–15 = F 2<br />
plants of Zhenshan 97A/M<strong>in</strong>ghui<br />
63, M = DNA size marker.<br />
Molecular markers, QTL mapp<strong>in</strong>g, and marker-assisted selection 227
too high. However, this marker is very useful <strong>in</strong> special cases<br />
such as seed disputes or seed lawsuits. If the 1,600-bp marker<br />
is related to the exon and the translation products (prote<strong>in</strong>)<br />
can be detected, it would be possible to make antibodies for<br />
seed purity <strong>in</strong>spection and to decrease the cost.<br />
References<br />
Kadowaki K, Ishige T, Suzuki S, Harada K, Sh<strong>in</strong>jyo C. 1986. Differences<br />
<strong>in</strong> the characteristics of mitochondrial DNA between<br />
normal and male sterile cytoplasm of japonica rice. Jpn. J.<br />
Breed. 36:333-339.<br />
Kadowaki K, Harada K. 1989. Differential organization of mitochondrial<br />
gene <strong>in</strong> rice with normal and male-sterile cytoplasm.<br />
Jpn. J. Breed. 39:179-186.<br />
Lu ZM, Hong DL. 1999. <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> hybrid rice seed production<br />
techniques. In: Basra AS, editor. Heterosis and hybrid seed<br />
production <strong>in</strong> agronomic crops. New York (USA): Food Products<br />
Press, an impr<strong>in</strong>t of The Haworth Press, Inc. p 65-79.<br />
Yamaguchi H, Kakiuchi H. 1983. Electrophoretic analysis of mitochondrial<br />
DNA from normal and male sterile cytoplasms <strong>in</strong><br />
rice. Jpn. J. Genet. 58:607-611.<br />
Notes<br />
F<strong>in</strong>e mapp<strong>in</strong>g of the F 1<br />
pollen sterility loci S-a<br />
and S-c <strong>in</strong> rice us<strong>in</strong>g PCR-based markers<br />
Guiquan Zhang and Zem<strong>in</strong> Zhang<br />
Authors’ addresses: D.L. Hong, M. Ichii, Y. Ohara, C.M. Zhao, and<br />
S. Taketa, Faculty of Agriculture, Kagawa University, Miki,<br />
Kagawa 761-0795, Japan; D.L. Jong, Department of<br />
Agronomy, Nanj<strong>in</strong>g Agricultural University, Nanj<strong>in</strong>g 210095,<br />
Ch<strong>in</strong>a.<br />
F 1<br />
hybrids from crosses between <strong>in</strong>dica and japonica rice usually show pollen sterility <strong>in</strong> vary<strong>in</strong>g degrees. Two loci, S-a and S-<br />
c, for F 1<br />
pollen sterility were mapped previously us<strong>in</strong>g restriction fragment length polymorphism markers. To develop polymerase<br />
cha<strong>in</strong> reaction-based marker-assisted selection, the S-a and S-c loci were mapped us<strong>in</strong>g simple sequence length<br />
polymorphism markers. Five markers—RM05, RM09, RM157B, RM24, and RM129—were found to be l<strong>in</strong>ked to S-a, which<br />
was 2.0 cM away from RM09 and 8.1 cM away from RM157B. One SSLP marker and one sequence-tagged site marker were<br />
detected to flank the S-c locus. It was 4.3 cM from RM218 and 0.3 cM from RG227STS. The mapp<strong>in</strong>g of S-a and S-c us<strong>in</strong>g<br />
PCR-based markers will facilitate marker-assisted selection <strong>in</strong> rice breed<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
F 1 pollen sterility usually occurs <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>dica/japonica crosses.<br />
Six loci of the F 1 pollen sterility genes were identified. In the<br />
heterozygotes (S i /S j ) at the loci, allelic <strong>in</strong>teraction causes the<br />
male gametes carry<strong>in</strong>g S j to be abortive. The abortive pollens<br />
caused by S-a alleles are empty and unsta<strong>in</strong>ed and those caused<br />
by the alleles at the other five loci can be sta<strong>in</strong>ed by 1% I 2 KI<br />
solution (Zhang et al 1994, Zhang and Lu 1996). A set of nearisogenic<br />
l<strong>in</strong>es (NILs) with different genotypes at the S-a, S-b,<br />
and S-c loci has been established (Zhang and Lu 1996). Us<strong>in</strong>g<br />
restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) markers, the<br />
S-a locus was mapped on chromosome 1 (Zhuang et al 1999)<br />
and the S-c locus on chromosome 3 (Zhuang et al 1996). In<br />
this study, we mapped the S-a and S-c loci us<strong>in</strong>g polymerase<br />
cha<strong>in</strong> reaction (PCR)-based markers to facilitate marker-assisted<br />
selection.<br />
Materials and methods<br />
The recurrent parent Taichung 65 and its NILs, TISL3 and<br />
TISL5, were used to develop the mapp<strong>in</strong>g populations. TISL3<br />
carried the genotype S-a i /S-a i and TISL5 had S-c j /S-c j , whereas<br />
Taichung 65 had S-a j /S-a j and S-c j /S-c j (Zhang and Lu 1996).<br />
The F 2 population from the cross Taichung 65/TISL3 consisted<br />
of 174 <strong>in</strong>dividuals. Another F 2 population of 314 plants was<br />
developed from the cross Taichung 65/TISL5. Pollen fertility<br />
was exam<strong>in</strong>ed under a microscope.<br />
DNA extraction was done us<strong>in</strong>g the CTAB method. The<br />
simple sequence length polymorphism (SSLP) markers were<br />
selected from the SSLP map (Temnykh et al 2000). We designed<br />
the primers of the RG227STS marker based on previous<br />
sequenc<strong>in</strong>g data (Fu et al, South Ch<strong>in</strong>a Agricultural University,<br />
personal communication). L<strong>in</strong>kage analysis was conducted<br />
us<strong>in</strong>g MAPMAKER/EXP version 3.0.<br />
Results and discussion<br />
Pollen fertility <strong>in</strong> the F 1<br />
and F 2<br />
populations<br />
In the cross Taichung 65/TISL3, F 1 pollen fertility was 65.4%.<br />
In the F 2 population of 314 <strong>in</strong>dividuals, 155 plants were fertile<br />
and 159 plants were sterile (Table 1). In Taichung 65/TISL5,<br />
F 1 pollen fertility was 52.1%. The segregation of fertile and<br />
sterile plants <strong>in</strong> the F 2 fit the ratio of 1:1 (Table 1).<br />
Polymorphism <strong>in</strong> the S-a and S-c regions<br />
Eight SSLP markers <strong>in</strong> the region of the S-a locus were selected<br />
to survey polymorphism between Taichung 65 and<br />
TISL3. Five of the markers—RM05, RM09, RM157B, RM24,<br />
and RM129—showed polymorphism between the parents. Four<br />
228 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
Table 1. Segregation of fertile and sterile plants <strong>in</strong> the F 2 populations.<br />
cM A Markers cM B Markers<br />
Cross Fertile Sterile Total Fertile:sterile<br />
Taichung 65/TISL3 155 159 314 1:1 (P>0.5)<br />
Taichung 65/TISL5 90 84 174 1:1 (P>0.5)<br />
0.5<br />
2.0<br />
RM129<br />
RM24<br />
RM157B<br />
SSLP markers near the S-c locus were used to survey polymorphism<br />
between Taichung 65 and TISL5, and only the<br />
marker RM218 produced polymorphism. To identify PCR<br />
markers l<strong>in</strong>ked to the S-c locus, the RFLP marker RG227—<br />
which was closely l<strong>in</strong>ked to S-c—was converted to an STS<br />
marker. From the products amplified with RG227STS primers,<br />
no amplicon length polymorphism (ALP) was found between<br />
Taichung 65 and TISL5. The amplified products (about<br />
700 bp <strong>in</strong> length) were then digested by three restriction enzymes.<br />
Only H<strong>in</strong>dIII produced polymorphism when the product<br />
from Taichung 65 was digested <strong>in</strong>to two fragments, whereas<br />
the product from TISL5 was undigested.<br />
Mapp<strong>in</strong>g of the S-a and S-c loci<br />
The map, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g five SSLP markers and the S-a locus, was<br />
constructed by us<strong>in</strong>g the F 2 population from the cross Taichung<br />
65/TISL3. The S-a locus was located <strong>in</strong> the region between<br />
markers RM09 and RM157B. The distances between the S-a<br />
locus and the markers RM09 and RM157B were 2.0 cM and<br />
8.1 cM, respectively (Fig. 1A). The S-c locus was mapped by<br />
us<strong>in</strong>g the F 2 population from the cross Taichung 65/TISL5.<br />
Flank<strong>in</strong>g the S-c locus were RM218, which was 4.3 cM away,<br />
and RG227STS, which was 0.3 cM away (Fig. 1B).<br />
We have identified six loci for F 1 pollen sterility genes<br />
<strong>in</strong> rice. The F 1 hybrid sterility between <strong>in</strong>dica and japonica<br />
could be overcome by develop<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dica-compatible japonica<br />
l<strong>in</strong>es (ICJLs). The ICJLs carry the genotype S i /S i rather than<br />
S j /S j at the F 1 pollen sterility loci so that they are compatible<br />
with <strong>in</strong>dica varieties (Zhang et al 1994, Zhang and Lu 1996).<br />
A breed<strong>in</strong>g program for ICJLs is be<strong>in</strong>g conducted. The PCRbased<br />
markers closely l<strong>in</strong>ked to the S-a and S-c loci are useful<br />
for marker-assisted selection <strong>in</strong> the ICJL breed<strong>in</strong>g program.<br />
8.1<br />
2.0<br />
2.7<br />
References<br />
S-a<br />
RM09<br />
RM05<br />
Temnykh S, Park WD, Ayres N, Cart<strong>in</strong>hour S, Hauck N, Lipovich L,<br />
Cho YG, Ishii T, McCouch SR. 2000. Mapp<strong>in</strong>g and genome<br />
organization of microsatellite sequences <strong>in</strong> rice (Oryza sativa<br />
L.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 100(5):697-712.<br />
Zhang G, Lu Y, Zhang J, Liu G. 1994. Genetic studies on hybrid<br />
sterility <strong>in</strong> cultivated rice (Oryza sativa). IV. Genotypes for<br />
F 1 pollen sterility. Ch<strong>in</strong>. J. Genet. 21:35-42.<br />
Zhang G, Lu Y. 1996. <strong>Genetics</strong> of F 1 pollen sterility <strong>in</strong> Oryza sativa.<br />
In: <strong>Rice</strong> genetics III. Manila (Philipp<strong>in</strong>es): <strong>International</strong> <strong>Rice</strong><br />
Research Institute. p 418-422.<br />
Zhuang C, Zhang G, Mei M, Lu Y. 1996. Molecular mapp<strong>in</strong>g of<br />
genes for F 1 pollen sterility <strong>in</strong> rice. Int. <strong>Rice</strong> Res. Notes 21(2-<br />
3):20-21.<br />
Zhuang C, Zhang G, Mei M, Lu Y. 1999. Molecular mapp<strong>in</strong>g of the<br />
S-a locus for F 1 pollen sterility <strong>in</strong> cultivated rice (Oryza sativa<br />
L.). Acta Genet. S<strong>in</strong>. 26(3):213-218.<br />
0.3<br />
4.3<br />
RG227STS<br />
S-c<br />
RM218<br />
Fig. 1. Genetic maps of the S-a and S-c regions constructed<br />
by PCR-based markers. (A) The map of the S-a region on rice<br />
chromosome 1. (B) The map of the S-c region on rice chromosome<br />
3.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ address: Plant Molecular Breed<strong>in</strong>g Research Center, South<br />
Ch<strong>in</strong>a Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, Ch<strong>in</strong>a.<br />
Molecular markers, QTL mapp<strong>in</strong>g, and marker-assisted selection 229
Map-based clon<strong>in</strong>g of the Hd1 gene controll<strong>in</strong>g<br />
photoperiod sensitivity <strong>in</strong> rice<br />
M. Ashikari, Y. Katayose, U. Yamanouchi, L. Monna, T. Fuse, T. Sasaki, and M. Yano<br />
A major quantitative trait locus, Hd1, that controls response to photoperiod was identified by the use of a map-based clon<strong>in</strong>g<br />
strategy. High-resolution mapp<strong>in</strong>g us<strong>in</strong>g 1,505 segregants permitted the def<strong>in</strong>ition of a genomic region of about 12 kb as a<br />
candidate for Hd1. Further analysis revealed that Hd1 is a homologue of CONSTANS <strong>in</strong> Arabidopsis and encodes a prote<strong>in</strong> with<br />
the structure of a z<strong>in</strong>c f<strong>in</strong>ger doma<strong>in</strong> and a nuclear localization signal. Sequenc<strong>in</strong>g analysis revealed a 43-bp deletion <strong>in</strong> the<br />
first exon of photoperiod-sensitivity (se1) mutant HS66 and a 433-bp <strong>in</strong>sertion <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>tron <strong>in</strong> mutant HS110. Structural<br />
analysis confirmed that the major gene controll<strong>in</strong>g response to photoperiod, Se1, was allelic to Hd1. Genetic complementation<br />
analysis confirmed the function of the candidate gene. The level of Hd1 mRNA was not greatly affected by a change <strong>in</strong><br />
daylength. The f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs suggest that Hd1 promotes head<strong>in</strong>g under short-day conditions and delays head<strong>in</strong>g under long-day<br />
conditions.<br />
Head<strong>in</strong>g date is one of the critical traits that enable rice to<br />
adapt to different cultivation areas and cropp<strong>in</strong>g seasons. Many<br />
genetic studies have been performed on head<strong>in</strong>g date. <strong>Rice</strong> is<br />
a short-day plant; its head<strong>in</strong>g is promoted by short daylength.<br />
Response to daylength (referred to as photoperiod sensitivity,<br />
PS) and basic vegetative growth (BVG) determ<strong>in</strong>e the head<strong>in</strong>g<br />
date of rice. Several genes controll<strong>in</strong>g PS <strong>in</strong> rice have been<br />
identified (Yokoo et al 1980, Yamagata et al 1986, Sano 1992).<br />
Quantitative trait loci (QTLs) for PS were also reported (Yano<br />
et al 1997, Yamamoto et al 1998, L<strong>in</strong> et al 2000). However, no<br />
PS gene has been cloned and little is known about the structure<br />
and function of PS genes <strong>in</strong> rice at the molecular level. In<br />
this paper, we report the isolation of a major rice PS QTL,<br />
Hd1, by map-based clon<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
F<strong>in</strong>e-scale and high-resolution mapp<strong>in</strong>g<br />
From approximately 9,000 plants segregat<strong>in</strong>g for Hd1, 1,505<br />
plants homozygous for the Kasalath Hd1 allele were selected<br />
on the basis of days to head<strong>in</strong>g (early head<strong>in</strong>g). The selected<br />
plants were used to detect recomb<strong>in</strong>ation events <strong>in</strong> the genomic<br />
region flank<strong>in</strong>g Hd1 with the pooled-sampl<strong>in</strong>g method. Eleven<br />
plants were selected and analyzed with restriction fragment<br />
length polymorphism (RFLP) markers and a cleaved amplified<br />
polymorphic sequence (CAPS) marker. The results suggest<br />
that Hd1 lies <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>terval between S20481 and P130<br />
(Fig. 1).<br />
Two yeast artificial chromosome (YAC) clones, Y4836<br />
and Y3955, were found to conta<strong>in</strong> three flank<strong>in</strong>g markers,<br />
C235, S20481, and S2539 (Fig. 1). Moreover, two P1-derived<br />
artificial chromosome (PAC) clones, P0676F10 and P0038C5,<br />
were selected with the flank<strong>in</strong>g markers from the PAC genomic<br />
library of Nipponbare. P0038C5 conta<strong>in</strong>ed sequences for<br />
S20481, S2539, and Y4836R. This suggests that P0038C5<br />
encompassed the Hd1 locus (Fig. 1). Then, P0038C5 was sequenced<br />
by the shotgun strategy. To more precisely determ<strong>in</strong>e<br />
the location of Hd1, we developed n<strong>in</strong>e CAPS markers (1a-i)<br />
us<strong>in</strong>g sequence data (Fig. 1). These CAPS markers enabled us<br />
to def<strong>in</strong>e 12 kb as the Hd1-conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g region.<br />
Identification and analysis of the Hd1 sequence<br />
The candidate genomic sequence was analyzed by the Genscan<br />
program. Two putative genes were predicted <strong>in</strong> this region (data<br />
not shown). A BLAST search of nonredundant DNA databases<br />
revealed that one putative gene showed significant similarity<br />
to the Arabidopsis CONSTANS (CO) gene. The sequence show<strong>in</strong>g<br />
similarity to CO was further analyzed as a candidate because<br />
of the known function of CO <strong>in</strong> the photoperiod response<br />
<strong>in</strong> Arabidopsis (Putterill et al 1995). A comparison of the sequences<br />
of Nipponbare and Kasalath revealed many sequence<br />
variations, such as deletions and base substitutions. We also<br />
analyzed sequences of the candidate genomic region of the<br />
se1 mutants HS66 and HS110 and their progenitor variety,<br />
G<strong>in</strong>bouzu. The Se1 locus was thought to be allelic to the Hd1<br />
locus based on the chromosomal location (Inoue et al 1992,<br />
Yamamoto et al 1998, Tamura et al 1998). By sequence comparison<br />
with the G<strong>in</strong>bouzu Hd1, we found a 43-bp deletion <strong>in</strong><br />
the putative first exon of se1 mutant HS66 and a 433-bp <strong>in</strong>sertion<br />
<strong>in</strong> the putative <strong>in</strong>tron of HS110. These results clearly suggest<br />
that Hd1 was allelic to Se1. In addition, we determ<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
the cDNA sequence of Hd1 by sequenc<strong>in</strong>g a product amplified<br />
by reverse transcriptase-polymerase cha<strong>in</strong> reaction (RT-<br />
PCR) and 3′ and 5′ primer extensions. The sequence obta<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
<strong>in</strong>dicates that rice Hd1 is composed of two exons that encode<br />
a 395-am<strong>in</strong>o-acid prote<strong>in</strong> and is a member of the Arabidopsis<br />
CO family with a z<strong>in</strong>c f<strong>in</strong>ger doma<strong>in</strong> (Fig. 2). The deduced<br />
am<strong>in</strong>o acid sequence of the Hd1 prote<strong>in</strong> was compared with<br />
CO from Arabidopsis and BnCOA1 from Brassica napus. The<br />
region conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the z<strong>in</strong>c f<strong>in</strong>ger motif showed 65% identity<br />
and a consensus structure of CX 2 CX 16 CX 2 C <strong>in</strong> the CO family,<br />
and the region near the C term<strong>in</strong>al end showed 83% identity<br />
and is thought to be a nuclear localization signal (Putterill et al<br />
1995, Robert et al 1998).<br />
230 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
A<br />
B<br />
C<br />
D<br />
Y4836<br />
Y3955<br />
S20481<br />
1a<br />
kb<br />
0<br />
R1679<br />
C235<br />
P0676F10<br />
P0038C5<br />
Hd1 candidate region<br />
Rec.<br />
1b 1c 1d 1e Rec.<br />
1f<br />
5<br />
S20481<br />
Hd1<br />
S2539<br />
2 6 1 2<br />
1g<br />
Y4836R<br />
P130<br />
1h<br />
Rec.<br />
1i<br />
Fig. 1. A f<strong>in</strong>e-scale, high-resolution genetic and physical map of<br />
the Hd1 region. (A) Genetic l<strong>in</strong>kage map show<strong>in</strong>g the relative position<br />
of Hd1 with RFLP markers. Numbers under the horizontal<br />
l<strong>in</strong>e are numbers of plants with a recomb<strong>in</strong>ant chromosome <strong>in</strong> the<br />
adjacent marker <strong>in</strong>tervals. (B) Yeast artificial chromosome (YAC)<br />
and (C) P1-derived artificial chromosome (PAC) clones spann<strong>in</strong>g<br />
the Hd1 region. A circle <strong>in</strong>dicates the presence of a sequence<br />
correspond<strong>in</strong>g to the RFLP markers. (D) F<strong>in</strong>e-scale genetic and<br />
physical map show<strong>in</strong>g relative position of the candidate region of<br />
Hd1 and CAPS markers developed based on the sequence data.<br />
Rec. <strong>in</strong>dicates the approximate position of recomb<strong>in</strong>ation events<br />
that occurred near Hd1.<br />
Y4836R<br />
Complementation of function of the candidate gene<br />
Fifty transgenic plants were obta<strong>in</strong>ed by Agrobacterium-mediated<br />
transformation with a 7.1-kb ApaI fragment conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />
the candidate gene region. The recipient l<strong>in</strong>e was a nearisogenic<br />
l<strong>in</strong>e (NIL) (Hd1/Hd2), <strong>in</strong> which both functional alleles<br />
at Hd1 and Hd2 were replaced by nonfunctional alleles<br />
of Kasalath (L<strong>in</strong> et al 2000). The self-poll<strong>in</strong>ated progenies of<br />
the selected plant that carried one copy of the <strong>in</strong>tegrated gene<br />
showed wide variation <strong>in</strong> days to head<strong>in</strong>g (53–93 d) under<br />
short-day (SD) conditions (Fig. 3). We used the CAPS marker<br />
1e to determ<strong>in</strong>e the presence or absence of the <strong>in</strong>tegrated gene<br />
<strong>in</strong> each plant. Plants without the gene and NIL Hd1/Hd2 showed<br />
more delayed head<strong>in</strong>g than plants homozygous or heterozygous<br />
for the gene. Thus, the 7.1-kb candidate genomic region<br />
promotes head<strong>in</strong>g under SD conditions. This is consistent with<br />
results compar<strong>in</strong>g NIL Hd2 and NIL Hd1/Hd2 (L<strong>in</strong> et al 2000).<br />
These results clearly suggest that the Hd1 sequence <strong>in</strong> the 7.1-<br />
kb candidate genomic region reta<strong>in</strong>s the function of photoperiod<br />
response.<br />
Hd1<br />
CO<br />
BnCOA1<br />
Consensus<br />
Hd1<br />
CO<br />
BnCOA1<br />
Consensus<br />
Hd1<br />
CO<br />
BnCOA1<br />
Consensus<br />
Hd1<br />
CO<br />
BnCOA1<br />
Consensus<br />
Hd1<br />
CO<br />
BnCOA1<br />
Consensus<br />
Hd1<br />
CO<br />
BnCOA1<br />
Consensus<br />
Fig. 2. Deduced am<strong>in</strong>o acid sequence of Hd1 prote<strong>in</strong> and am<strong>in</strong>o acid alignment with Arabidopsis CO and Brassica napus<br />
BnCOA1. Boxes <strong>in</strong> N and C term<strong>in</strong>i are conserved doma<strong>in</strong>s of the z<strong>in</strong>c f<strong>in</strong>ger motif (N) and nuclear localization signals (C).<br />
Arrowheads <strong>in</strong>dicate cyste<strong>in</strong>e residues <strong>in</strong> the z<strong>in</strong>c f<strong>in</strong>ger doma<strong>in</strong>. Letters <strong>in</strong> boldface represent identical am<strong>in</strong>o acid residues<br />
among the three prote<strong>in</strong>s.<br />
Molecular markers, QTL mapp<strong>in</strong>g, and marker-assisted selection 231
No. of plants<br />
4<br />
Nipponbare<br />
3<br />
NIL (Hd2)<br />
NIL (Hd1/Hd2)<br />
gDNA<br />
Nipponbare<br />
NIL (Hd1)<br />
G<strong>in</strong>bouzu<br />
HS66<br />
HS110<br />
M L S0 S5 S10 L S10 L S10 L S10 L S10<br />
2<br />
1<br />
0<br />
52 55 58 61 6467 70 73 76 79 82 85 88 91 94<br />
Days to head<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Fig. 3. Frequency distribution for days to head<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> selfpoll<strong>in</strong>ated<br />
progenies of one transformant. All plants were<br />
cultivated under short-day conditions (10.0 h) <strong>in</strong> a controlled<br />
growth chamber. Columns <strong>in</strong>dicate plants with (black) and<br />
without ( ) the candidate genomic fragment.<br />
Fig. 4. Detection of mRNA <strong>in</strong> the varieties and l<strong>in</strong>es used <strong>in</strong> this<br />
study by RT-PCR assay. All plants were raised <strong>in</strong> long-day (16.0 h)<br />
conditions and then subjected to the follow<strong>in</strong>g treatments. L =<br />
additional 10-d treatment <strong>in</strong> LD, S0 = no additional treatment, S5<br />
= additional 5-d treatment under short daylength (10.0 h), and<br />
S10 = additional 10-d treatment under short daylength.<br />
Expression of Hd1<br />
To determ<strong>in</strong>e whether the Hd1 candidate region was expressed<br />
and whether the expression of Hd1 was <strong>in</strong>duced by a change<br />
<strong>in</strong> daylength, we performed RT-PCR analysis (Fig. 4). The<br />
amplified fragment was designed to <strong>in</strong>clude a 33-bp deletion<br />
<strong>in</strong> Kasalath, a 43-bp deletion <strong>in</strong> HS66, and a 433-bp <strong>in</strong>sertion<br />
<strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>tron <strong>in</strong> HS110. Hd1 mRNA was detected <strong>in</strong> Nipponbare<br />
and NIL Hd1. However, the amplified product was slightly<br />
smaller <strong>in</strong> Kasalath than <strong>in</strong> Nipponbare. Sequenc<strong>in</strong>g of the<br />
amplified product showed this size difference to be consistent<br />
with the 33-bp deletion <strong>in</strong> the genomic sequences. G<strong>in</strong>bouzu<br />
produced the same level of mRNA as Nipponbare. The se1<br />
mutant HS66 also produced the same level of mRNA as<br />
G<strong>in</strong>bouzu, but its PCR product was slightly smaller than that<br />
of G<strong>in</strong>bouzu. In contrast, several k<strong>in</strong>ds of amplified products<br />
of the se1 mutant HS110 were seen <strong>in</strong> the RT-PCR assay (Fig.<br />
4). Sequenc<strong>in</strong>g of these RT-PCR products revealed that the<br />
size difference was consistent with that observed <strong>in</strong> genomic<br />
sequences. These results clearly <strong>in</strong>dicate that loss of functions<br />
<strong>in</strong> Kasalath Hd1 and se1 <strong>in</strong> HS66 and HS110 might have occurred<br />
because of the altered transcripts. The mRNA levels of<br />
Nipponbare at Hd1 did not change with a transition from longday<br />
(LD) to SD conditions (Fig. 4), which was associated with<br />
the <strong>in</strong>itiation of the transition to head<strong>in</strong>g. These results suggest<br />
that the expression of Hd1 is not greatly affected by a<br />
change <strong>in</strong> daylength.<br />
Conclusions<br />
Hd1, a major photoperiod-sensitivity QTL <strong>in</strong> rice, encodes a<br />
prote<strong>in</strong> with the structure of the z<strong>in</strong>c f<strong>in</strong>ger transcription factor<br />
that shows high similarity to CO prote<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> Arabidopsis. A<br />
major photoperiod-sensitivity gene, Se1, is allelic to Hd. The<br />
level of Hd1 mRNA was not affected by a change <strong>in</strong> daylength.<br />
Hd1 promotes head<strong>in</strong>g under SD conditions and <strong>in</strong>hibits it<br />
under LD conditions. Hd1 played an important role <strong>in</strong> the genetic<br />
control pathway of photoperiod response <strong>in</strong> both SD and<br />
LD conditions.<br />
References<br />
Inoue H, Tanisaka T, Okumoto Y, Yamagata H. 1992. An early-head<strong>in</strong>g<br />
mutant gene of a mutant l<strong>in</strong>e HS66 of rice. Rep. Soc. Crop<br />
Sci. Breed. K<strong>in</strong>ki 37:47-52. (In Japanese with English summary.)<br />
L<strong>in</strong> HX, Yamamoto T, Sasaki T, Yano M. 2000. Characterization<br />
and detection of epistatic <strong>in</strong>teractions of three QTLs, Hd1,<br />
Hd2 and Hd3, controll<strong>in</strong>g head<strong>in</strong>g date <strong>in</strong> rice us<strong>in</strong>g nearisogenic<br />
l<strong>in</strong>es. Theor. Appl. Genet. 101:1021-1028.<br />
Putterill J, Robson F, Lee K, Simon R, Coupland G. 1995. The<br />
CONSTANS gene of Arabidopsis promotes flower<strong>in</strong>g and encodes<br />
a prote<strong>in</strong> show<strong>in</strong>g similarities to z<strong>in</strong>c f<strong>in</strong>ger transcription<br />
factors. Cell 80:847-857.<br />
Robert LS, Robson F, Sharpe A, Lydiate D, Coupland G. 1998. Conserved<br />
structure and function of the Arabidopsis flower<strong>in</strong>g<br />
time gene CONSTANS <strong>in</strong> Brassica napus. Plant Mol. Biol.<br />
37:763-773.<br />
Sano Y. 1992. Genetic comparisons of chromosome 6 between wild<br />
and cultivated rice. Jpn. J. Breed. 42:561-572.<br />
Tamura K, Nomura K, Oshima I, Namai H, Yano M, Sasaki T, Kikuchi<br />
F. 1998. Identification of restriction fragment length polymorphism<br />
markers tightly l<strong>in</strong>ked to a major photoperiod sensitivity<br />
gene, Se-1, and to a blast resistance gene, Piz-t, <strong>in</strong> rice.<br />
SABRAO J. 30:61-67.<br />
Yamagata H, Okumoto Y, Tanisaka T. 1986. Analysis of genes controll<strong>in</strong>g<br />
head<strong>in</strong>g time <strong>in</strong> Japanese rice. In: <strong>Rice</strong> genetics I.<br />
Manila (Philipp<strong>in</strong>es): <strong>International</strong> <strong>Rice</strong> Research Institute.<br />
p 351-359.<br />
Yamamoto T, Kuboki Y, L<strong>in</strong> SY, Sasati T, Yano M. 1998. F<strong>in</strong>e mapp<strong>in</strong>g<br />
of quantitative trait loci Hd-1, Hd-2 and Hd-3, controll<strong>in</strong>g<br />
head<strong>in</strong>g date of rice, as s<strong>in</strong>gle Mendelian factors. Theor.<br />
Appl. Genet. 97:37-44.<br />
232 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
Yano M, Harushima Y, Nagamura Y, Kurata N, M<strong>in</strong>obe Y, Sasaki T.<br />
1997. Identification of quantitative trait loci controll<strong>in</strong>g head<strong>in</strong>g<br />
date <strong>in</strong> rice us<strong>in</strong>g a high-density l<strong>in</strong>kage map. Theor. Appl.<br />
Genet. 95:1025-1032.<br />
Yokoo M, Kikuchi F, Nakane A, Fujimaki H. 1980. Genetical analysis<br />
of head<strong>in</strong>g time by aid of close l<strong>in</strong>kage with blast,<br />
Pyricularia oryzae, resistance <strong>in</strong> rice. Bull. Natl. Inst. Agric.<br />
Sci. Ser. D 31:95-126.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ addresses: M. Ashikari, T. Fuse, Bio-oriented Technology<br />
Research Advancement Institution, Omiya, Saitama 331-853;<br />
Y. Katayose, T. Sasaki, M. Yano, National Institute of<br />
Agrobiological Resources, Kannondai 2-1-2, Tsukuba, Ibaraki<br />
305-8602; U. Yamanouchi, L. Monna, Institute of the Society<br />
for Techno-<strong>in</strong>novation of Agriculture, Forestry, and Fisheries,<br />
Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-0854; U. Yamanouchi, Department<br />
of Biology, Faculty of Science, Toyama University, 3190<br />
Gofuku, Toyama 930-8555, Japan.<br />
Acknowledgments: We thank Prof. T. Tanisaka and Dr. Y. Okumoto,<br />
Kyoto University, Japan, for their valuable comments and for<br />
provid<strong>in</strong>g the se1 mutants. This work is supported ma<strong>in</strong>ly by<br />
funds from the Program for Promotion of Basic Research<br />
Activities for Innovative Biosciences.<br />
Response of QTLs for head<strong>in</strong>g date <strong>in</strong> rice at different sites<br />
from tropical to temperate regions<br />
Y. Fukuta, S. Kobayashi, H. Tsunematsu, L.A. Ebron, H. Kato, T. Umemoto, S. Morita, T. Sato, T. Yamaya, T. Nagam<strong>in</strong>e, T. Fukuyama,<br />
H. Sasahara, I. Ashikawa, K. Tamura, H. Nemoto, H. Maeda, K. Hamamura, T. Ogata, Y. Matsue, K. Ichitani, and A. Takagi<br />
A total of 26 QTLs for head<strong>in</strong>g date were obta<strong>in</strong>ed from 28 experiments carried out at 10 sites from tropical to temperate<br />
regions us<strong>in</strong>g 191 recomb<strong>in</strong>ant <strong>in</strong>bred l<strong>in</strong>es (RILs) derived from a cross <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dica (Milyang 23) and japonica (Akihikari)<br />
cultivars. These RILs were evaluated <strong>in</strong> tropical and temperate regions; at <strong>IRRI</strong> <strong>in</strong> the 2000 dry season and at n<strong>in</strong>e sites located<br />
from Kyushu to Tohoku <strong>in</strong> Japan from 1995 to 1999, respectively. Because the QTL correspond<strong>in</strong>g to a photoperiod-sensitive<br />
gene, Se1, on chromosome 6 was not detected <strong>in</strong> these analyses, it was estimated that these two parents have the same<br />
allele on the locus. In temperate regions, it was found that two QTLs located on chromosomes 7 and 11 had a strong effect on<br />
head<strong>in</strong>g date. Although the two QTLs were not detected <strong>in</strong> the tropical region, four specific QTLs were recognized on chromosomes<br />
2, 3, 9, and 10. It was hypothesized that the genes relat<strong>in</strong>g to vegetative growth played an important role <strong>in</strong> segregation<br />
<strong>in</strong> the tropical region and the photoperiod-sensitive and vegetative growth genes had a comb<strong>in</strong>ed effect <strong>in</strong> temperate regions<br />
because it was assumed that the QTL on chromosome 7 corresponded to a photoperiod-sensitive gene, E1.<br />
Head<strong>in</strong>g date <strong>in</strong> rice is an important trait for adaptation to different<br />
cultivation regions and cropp<strong>in</strong>g seasons. Ichitani et al<br />
(1998) and K<strong>in</strong>oshita (1998) summarized 23 major genes controll<strong>in</strong>g<br />
head<strong>in</strong>g date, 13 of which were mapped on chromosomes.<br />
Many studies, such as those of Li et al (1995), Yano et<br />
al (1997), Doi et al (1998), and Yamamoto et al (1998, 2000),<br />
have been conducted on the genetic analysis of head<strong>in</strong>g traits<br />
us<strong>in</strong>g DNA markers. We used recomb<strong>in</strong>ant <strong>in</strong>bred l<strong>in</strong>es (RILs)<br />
to identify chromosomal regions associated with head<strong>in</strong>g date<br />
and to <strong>in</strong>vestigate the genotype × environment <strong>in</strong>teraction at<br />
<strong>in</strong>dividual QTLs <strong>in</strong> different conditions from temperate to tropical<br />
regions.<br />
Materials and methods<br />
An RI population consist<strong>in</strong>g of 191 RILs was used <strong>in</strong> this study.<br />
The population was developed from a cross between Korean<br />
<strong>in</strong>dica rice variety Milyang 23 and Japanese japonica rice variety<br />
Akihikari. Data on segregation of 183 RFLP markers had<br />
been obta<strong>in</strong>ed from these RILs (Fig. 1, Fukuta et al 1999).<br />
The head<strong>in</strong>g date of the RI population was evaluated <strong>in</strong><br />
28 field experiments at n<strong>in</strong>e sites <strong>in</strong> Japan (J) and one site <strong>in</strong><br />
the Philipp<strong>in</strong>es (P): Ohmagari (J), located at 39.28°N, 1999;<br />
Sendai (J), 38.15°N, from 1996 to 1999; Niigata (J), 37.55°N,<br />
<strong>in</strong> 1996 and 1999; Joetsu, 37.07°N, from 1995 to 1999;<br />
Tsukuba (J), 36.12°N, from 1997 to 1999; Totori (J), 35.30°N,<br />
1999; Fukuyama (J), 34.29°N, 1997 and 1999; Fukuoka (J),<br />
33.35°N, 1997 to 1999; Kagoshima (J), 31.35°N, 1999; and<br />
Los Baños (P), 2000 <strong>in</strong> the dry season, 14.11°N. The RILs<br />
were grown from May to October <strong>in</strong> Japan and dur<strong>in</strong>g the dry<br />
season from December 1999 to April 2000 <strong>in</strong> the Philipp<strong>in</strong>es.<br />
At Joetsu <strong>in</strong> 1997 and 1998, and at Sendai <strong>in</strong> 1997 and 1999,<br />
RI populations were also cultivated under different fertilizer<br />
conditions (N: 0 kg ha –1 or 7–100 kg ha –1 ) (Fig.1). The date<br />
from transplant<strong>in</strong>g to head<strong>in</strong>g (head<strong>in</strong>g date) was determ<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
for each l<strong>in</strong>e.<br />
Interval mapp<strong>in</strong>g for QTLs was carried out us<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
software QGENE (Nelson 1997). A LOD score threshold of<br />
2.0 for declar<strong>in</strong>g the presence of a QTL was used. The LOD<br />
score’s peaks for each significant QTL were then used to position<br />
the QTL on the l<strong>in</strong>kage map. The gene effect (additive<br />
effect) and percent phenotypic variation attributable to <strong>in</strong>dividual<br />
QTLs were estimated at the peaks.<br />
Molecular markers, QTL mapp<strong>in</strong>g, and marker-assisted selection 233
CEN<br />
1S<br />
1L<br />
0.0 C970<br />
10.4 XNpb107<br />
13.6 20.3 NO79A<br />
R210B<br />
20.7 XNpb359<br />
30.4 XNpb90<br />
32.0 C955<br />
51.3 R210<br />
55.9 XNpb364<br />
70.4 Y2746L*<br />
82.1 XNpb302<br />
84.9 C122<br />
91.8 XNpb201<br />
95.2 96.8 XNpb393<br />
XNpb147<br />
104.4 XNpb92<br />
113.1 C86<br />
122.5 XNpb113<br />
3.0<br />
2.3<br />
2.1<br />
2.3<br />
138.0 XNpb393B<br />
140.1 XNpb346<br />
144.4 C112<br />
2S 0.0 XNpb349<br />
0.2 N366U<br />
2L<br />
25.1 XNpb227<br />
40.3 XNpb353<br />
41.9 C196<br />
46.5 XNpb132<br />
57.2 G2140B<br />
58.6 G1314B<br />
66.3 NI62A<br />
72.2 XNpb199<br />
86.2 XNpb39<br />
104.2 XNpb298<br />
127.3 G1234<br />
129.0 XNpb317B<br />
N164K<br />
AC. –2.9<br />
AB, –2.1<br />
Y, –2.8<br />
R, –2.0<br />
O. –2.2<br />
D, –2.3<br />
9S 0.0 XNpb315<br />
1.5 G1314D<br />
2.4 XNpb36<br />
3.5 R1164<br />
15.4 XNpb40*<br />
18.7 XNpb103<br />
22.2 XNpb160<br />
24.4 XNpb317C*<br />
27.3 XNpb401<br />
37.1 R1751<br />
42.3 XNpb385<br />
46.6 XNpb13<br />
47.3 XNpb211<br />
47.9 R2638<br />
65.5 XNpb293<br />
69.2 G1445<br />
9L<br />
AC, 2.0<br />
AA, 2.4<br />
Z, 2.7<br />
Y, 3.0<br />
3.3<br />
U, 2.6<br />
3.6<br />
s, 3.8<br />
R, 2.9<br />
P, 2.5<br />
O, 3.9<br />
4.4<br />
2.9<br />
3.4<br />
I, 3.3<br />
D, 2.2<br />
C, 2.4<br />
B, 2.7<br />
A, 2.6<br />
CEN<br />
AC, 2.1<br />
2.4<br />
N, 4.3<br />
M, 3.3<br />
L, 2.6<br />
2.1<br />
2.5<br />
X, 2.7<br />
2.4<br />
T, 2.5<br />
AA, 3.8<br />
Z, 2.4<br />
P, 3.4<br />
O, 2.0<br />
N, 2.2<br />
2.5<br />
H, 2.2<br />
CEN<br />
3S<br />
AC, 2.9<br />
AD, 2.1<br />
2.9<br />
K, 2.2<br />
J, 2.0<br />
CEN<br />
6S<br />
6L<br />
0.0 XNpb209<br />
15.8 C764<br />
34.8 R2171<br />
36.4 40.0 C235<br />
C488*<br />
41.6 XNpb172<br />
48.6 G2028<br />
57.9 G2140C<br />
58.1 G1314A<br />
69.4 XNpb12<br />
81.2 XNpb135<br />
85.4 XNpb342<br />
P, 2.1<br />
J, 2.1<br />
H, 2.3<br />
AD, 3.5<br />
AB, 2.2<br />
Z, 2.1<br />
Y, 2.1<br />
X, 3.1<br />
T, 3.1<br />
S, 2.1<br />
N, 2.3<br />
M, 3.3<br />
L, 3.1<br />
I, 3.1<br />
H, 2.3<br />
E, 2.7<br />
D, 3.3<br />
C, 2.0<br />
A, 5.2<br />
CEN<br />
3L<br />
0.0 C74<br />
12.8 XNpb129<br />
17.4 XNpb238<br />
18.6 XNpb192<br />
19.1 XNpb326<br />
19.4 XNpb74<br />
27.8 C198<br />
28.8 N26AD<br />
30.6 R2170<br />
32.3 Y3870L<br />
34.5 XNpb79<br />
XNpb144<br />
Y, 4.1<br />
56.6 R250<br />
65.3 C136<br />
82.7 XNpb249<br />
110.7 XNpb48<br />
110.9 G1318<br />
AD, 2.2<br />
AC, 2.9<br />
AB, 2.8<br />
Z, 2.4<br />
Y, 2.1<br />
X, 2.7<br />
U, 2.7<br />
T, 3.5<br />
P, 2.0<br />
O, 2.7<br />
N, 2.1<br />
M, 3.0<br />
I, 2.3<br />
H, 3.4<br />
G, 3.1<br />
F, 3.2<br />
E, 2.9<br />
D, 2.1<br />
C, 2.5<br />
A, 4.1<br />
0.0 XNpb50<br />
3.6 N1165R<br />
12.6 C1057<br />
20.8 R2401<br />
CEN<br />
7L<br />
32.3 XNpb338<br />
37.8 R643B*<br />
38.4 XNpb33<br />
43.7 XNpb91<br />
46.6 C451<br />
XNpb152<br />
53.1 XNpb117<br />
64.6 NASL56<br />
65.6 C507<br />
67.3 XNpb379<br />
78.4 N622U<br />
78.7 C213<br />
AD, 3.5<br />
Q, –2.0<br />
K, –2.0<br />
E, –2.1<br />
Z, –2.4<br />
Y, –2.3<br />
O, –2.4<br />
M, –2.1<br />
K, –2.0<br />
AC, 12.8<br />
AB, 4.9<br />
AA, 2.0<br />
Z, 9.3<br />
Y, 12.1<br />
X, 8.7<br />
U, 6.5<br />
T, 7.9<br />
S, 9.5<br />
R, 11.6<br />
Q, 8.7<br />
P, 3.5<br />
O, 11.8<br />
N, 3.1<br />
M, 4.4<br />
L, 5.5<br />
K, 3.5<br />
J, 3.0<br />
I, 4.1<br />
H, 3.7<br />
G, 4.1<br />
F, 4.1<br />
E, 2.9<br />
D, 4.2<br />
C, 7.2<br />
B, 8.0<br />
A, 5.9<br />
10S<br />
10L<br />
0.0 G1084<br />
3.1 R1629<br />
4.7 C1286<br />
8.1 N9U<br />
17.8 XNpb133<br />
18.1 N33K<br />
20.2 XNpb37<br />
25.5 R1877<br />
26.1 C1361<br />
30.0 G2155<br />
35.7 C16<br />
44.6 XNpb127<br />
11S<br />
11L<br />
0.0 XNpb42B<br />
XNpb142B<br />
1.8 XNpb335A<br />
2.3 XNpb189A<br />
18.2 NSSK190<br />
20.0 C477<br />
22.6 XNpb320<br />
C734C<br />
24.8 XNpb179<br />
30.8 N099K<br />
31.5 XNpb202<br />
35.5 XNpb257<br />
45.3 C1172<br />
48.9 C1003A<br />
65.7 XNpb181<br />
67.8 G2132A<br />
2.5<br />
–2.5<br />
–2.9<br />
–2.0<br />
AB, –2.2<br />
–4.2<br />
–3.0<br />
–2.4<br />
–2.6<br />
–2.3<br />
–2.7<br />
–3.0<br />
CEN<br />
4S<br />
0.0 XNpb203<br />
R1854<br />
CEN<br />
31.6 C708<br />
54.9 C734<br />
77.7 XNpb237<br />
4L<br />
108.8 XNpb271<br />
116.2 C513<br />
117.8 XNpb161<br />
129.2 XNpb331<br />
141.8 XNpb235<br />
142.3 XNpb264<br />
144.3 XNpb197<br />
148.1 C1016<br />
156.3 C445<br />
AB, –4.5<br />
AA, –8.9<br />
Z, –3.9<br />
Y, –3.0<br />
T, –3.8<br />
S, –3.8<br />
R, –4.7<br />
O, –3.8<br />
P, –7.0<br />
o. –4.1<br />
N, –2.4<br />
M, –3.8<br />
L, –5.9<br />
K, –8.2<br />
J, –9.2<br />
I, –5.0<br />
H, –4.6<br />
G, –2.9<br />
F, –2.1<br />
E, –68<br />
D, –5.1<br />
C, –4.7<br />
B, –4.0<br />
AC, –2.1<br />
H, 2.2<br />
G, 2.4<br />
E, 2.4<br />
D, 2.5<br />
8S<br />
0.0 XNpb278<br />
1.5 C825<br />
11.2 XNpb321<br />
12.6 XNpb38<br />
41.3 XNpb104<br />
CEN 43.0 XNpb369<br />
44.6 G1314C<br />
51.4 G2132B<br />
53.4 G1073<br />
59.1 XNpb187<br />
8L<br />
88.3 XNpb56<br />
91.7 R662<br />
93.1 XNpb321B<br />
CEN<br />
12S<br />
XNpb193<br />
0.0 XNpb77*<br />
XNpb169*<br />
6.3 XNpb142A<br />
XNpb42A<br />
6.9 XNpb189B<br />
XNpb335B<br />
8.1 XNpb338B<br />
14.0 XNpb124B<br />
38.9 XNpb304<br />
39.0 G2140A<br />
41.2 XNpb307<br />
O, 2.1<br />
5S<br />
5L<br />
0.0 XNpb139<br />
9.5 Rpr1-1<br />
0.0 N358L<br />
1.9 XNpb387<br />
10.7 R569<br />
18.6 C734B<br />
28.1 XNpb327<br />
XNpb105<br />
30.0 31.3 XNpb366<br />
R1553<br />
36.4 C128<br />
39.6 XNpb255<br />
53.5 C246<br />
61.1 XNpb297<br />
74.4 C1069<br />
74.8 XNpb148<br />
12L<br />
87.8 G1106<br />
92.3 C901<br />
AD, 3.3<br />
Fig. 1. Detected QTLs for head<strong>in</strong>g date. The position of the QTLs is <strong>in</strong>dicated on the left side of each chromosome. Triangles and vertical<br />
bars <strong>in</strong>dicate the position of the QTLs and the chromosome regions that showed a higher LOD score than 2.0 by <strong>in</strong>terval mapp<strong>in</strong>g analysis.<br />
The turned-up and <strong>in</strong>verted triangles of QTLs <strong>in</strong>dicate the positive functions for late head<strong>in</strong>g with Milyang 23 and Akihikari, respectively.<br />
Letters and numbers <strong>in</strong>dicate the <strong>in</strong>vestigation conditions and the peak values of LOD score detected by <strong>in</strong>terval mapp<strong>in</strong>g at the QTL,<br />
respectively. The RFLP l<strong>in</strong>kage map (Fukuta et al 1999) was modified. (A) Sendai <strong>in</strong> 1996. (B) Sendai A (N: 100 kg ha –1 ) <strong>in</strong> 1997. (C) Sendai<br />
B (N: 0 kg ha –1 ) <strong>in</strong> 1997. (D) Sendai A (N: 0 kg ha –1 ) <strong>in</strong> 1999. (E) Sendai B (N: 100 kg ha –1 ) <strong>in</strong> 1999. (F) Niigata A <strong>in</strong> 1996. (G) Niigata B <strong>in</strong><br />
1996. (H) Niigata <strong>in</strong> 1999. (I) Joetsu <strong>in</strong> 1995. (J) Joetsu A <strong>in</strong> 1996. (K) Joetsu B <strong>in</strong> 1996. (L) Joetsu A (N: 70 kg ha –1 ) <strong>in</strong> 1997. (M) Joetsu<br />
B (N: 0 kg ha –1 ) <strong>in</strong> 1997. (N) Joetsu A (N: 70 kg ha –1 ) <strong>in</strong> 1998. (O) Joetsu B (N: 0 kg ha –1 ) <strong>in</strong> 1998. (P) Joetsu <strong>in</strong> 1999. (Q) Tsukuba <strong>in</strong> 1997.<br />
(R) Tsukuba <strong>in</strong> 1999. (S) Tsukuba <strong>in</strong> 1999. (T) Fukuyama <strong>in</strong> 1997. (U) Fukuyama <strong>in</strong> 1999. (X) Fukuoka <strong>in</strong> 1997. (Y) Fukuoka <strong>in</strong> 1998. (Z)<br />
Fukuoka <strong>in</strong> 1999. (AA) Ohmagari <strong>in</strong> 1999. (AB) Totori <strong>in</strong> 1999. (AC) Kagoshima <strong>in</strong> 1999. (AD) Los Baños <strong>in</strong> 2000 dry season.<br />
234 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
Results and discussion<br />
Segregation for head<strong>in</strong>g date<br />
Parental variety Akihikari had an earlier head<strong>in</strong>g date than<br />
Milyang 23 <strong>in</strong> every condition, and the range of the differences<br />
varied from approximately 2 to 3 wk.<br />
The segregation of the RI population showed wide variations<br />
and transgressive segregation <strong>in</strong> early and late head<strong>in</strong>g<br />
date was also observed. The range of head<strong>in</strong>g days <strong>in</strong> the RI<br />
population varied from 24 to 55. Specially recognized was the<br />
tendency to have earlier head<strong>in</strong>g at southern sites than at northern<br />
sites. Moreover, b<strong>in</strong>omial distribution was observed (Fig.<br />
2). The differences <strong>in</strong> segregation under various fertilizer conditions<br />
were not as clear as the differences among years and<br />
sites (data not shown).<br />
Interval mapp<strong>in</strong>g for QTLs<br />
A total of 26 QTLs for head<strong>in</strong>g date were detected based on<br />
analyses of results of 28 experiments (Fig. 1). But the QTL<br />
correspond<strong>in</strong>g to a photoperiod-sensitive gene, Se1, on chromosome<br />
6 was not detected <strong>in</strong> these analyses. It was estimated<br />
that these two parents have the same allele on the locus.<br />
Two QTLs on chromosomes 7 and 11 <strong>in</strong>dicated strong,<br />
stable, and unique functions (Fig. 3). The QTLs on chromosomes<br />
7 and 11 affected late head<strong>in</strong>g with the Milyang 23 and<br />
Akihikari homozygotes, respectively. Moreover, the strength<br />
of QTL function varied among sites and years. In the 1999<br />
<strong>in</strong>vestigations, the QTL on chromosome 7 (southern sites) <strong>in</strong>dicated<br />
a stronger function and the QTL on chromosome 11<br />
(northern sites) showed the contrary. A reciprocal relationship<br />
was also detected between the two QTLs when one QTL <strong>in</strong>dicated<br />
a high LOD score and the other showed a low value<br />
(experimental results for some years <strong>in</strong> Joetsu, Sendai, and<br />
Tsukuba). These results <strong>in</strong>dicate that two QTLs with strong<br />
functions on chromosomes 7 and 11 acted ma<strong>in</strong>ly <strong>in</strong> the RI<br />
population <strong>in</strong> the temperate region. It was also assumed that<br />
the QTL on chromosome 7 corresponded to a photoperiodsensitive<br />
gene, E1, because the detected QTLs are located <strong>in</strong><br />
the same chromosomal region described by Ichitani et al (1998).<br />
Although the total phenotypic variations of the RI population<br />
were almost expla<strong>in</strong>ed by the two QTLs <strong>in</strong> Japan (data<br />
not shown), these were not detected at <strong>IRRI</strong>. Five other QTLs<br />
were detected at Los Baños. Of these, four QTLs were detected<br />
on chromosomes 2, 3, 9, and 10. This means that head<strong>in</strong>g<br />
date <strong>in</strong> a tropical region is controlled by a genetic mechanism<br />
that is completely different from that <strong>in</strong> a temperate region.<br />
Although different results with detected QTLs were recognized<br />
among the fertilizer <strong>in</strong>vestigations, a def<strong>in</strong>ite tendency<br />
was not shown.<br />
It might be hypothesized that the genes relat<strong>in</strong>g to vegetative<br />
growth played an important role <strong>in</strong> the segregation <strong>in</strong><br />
tropical regions, and the photosensitive and vegetative growth<br />
genes acted together <strong>in</strong> temperate regions. It is necessary to<br />
clarify the relationships among the detected QTLs and to evaluate<br />
the reaction of QTLs <strong>in</strong> the wet season at Los Baños to<br />
confirm the hypothesis and the genetic mechanism of head<strong>in</strong>g<br />
date.<br />
References<br />
Doi K, Yoshimura A, Iwata N. 1998. RFLP mapp<strong>in</strong>g and QTL analysis<br />
of head<strong>in</strong>g date and pollen sterility us<strong>in</strong>g backcross population<br />
between Oryza sativa L. and Oryza glaberrima Steud.<br />
Breed. Sci. 48:395-399.<br />
Fukuta Y, Tamura T, Sasahara H, Fukuyama T. 1999. Genetic and<br />
breed<strong>in</strong>g analysis us<strong>in</strong>g molecular markers: variations of gene<br />
frequency and the RFLP map of the hybrid population derived<br />
from the cross between the rice variety Milyang 23 and<br />
Akihikari. Breed. Res. 1(suppl. 2):176.<br />
Ichitani K, Okumoto Y, Tanisaka T. 1998. Genetic analysis of the<br />
rice cultivar Kasalath with special reference to two photoperiod<br />
sensitivity loci, E1 and Se1. Breed. Sci. 48:51-57.<br />
K<strong>in</strong>oshita T. 1998. Report of the Committee on Gene Symbolization,<br />
Nomenclature and L<strong>in</strong>kage Group. II. L<strong>in</strong>kage mapp<strong>in</strong>g<br />
us<strong>in</strong>g mutant genes <strong>in</strong> rice. <strong>Rice</strong> Genet. Newsl. 15:13-74.<br />
Li Z, P<strong>in</strong>son SRM, Stansel JW, Park WD. 1995. Identification of<br />
quantitative trait loci (QTLs) for head<strong>in</strong>g date and plant height<br />
<strong>in</strong> cultivated rice (Oryza sativa L.). Theor. Appl. Genet.<br />
91:374-381.<br />
Nelson JC. 1997. QGENE: software for marker-based genomic analysis<br />
and breed<strong>in</strong>g. Mol. Breed. 3:239-245.<br />
Yamamoto T, Kuboki Y, L<strong>in</strong> SY, Sasaki T, Yano M. 1998. F<strong>in</strong>e mapp<strong>in</strong>g<br />
of quantitative trait loci Hd-1, Hd-2 and Hd-3, controll<strong>in</strong>g<br />
head<strong>in</strong>g date of rice, as s<strong>in</strong>gle Mendelian factors. Theor.<br />
Appl. Genet. 97:37-44.<br />
Yamamoto T, L<strong>in</strong> H, Sasaki T, Yano M. 2000. Identification of head<strong>in</strong>g<br />
date quantitative trait locus Hd6 and characterization of<br />
its epistatic <strong>in</strong>teractions with Hd2 <strong>in</strong> rice us<strong>in</strong>g advanced backcross<br />
progeny. <strong>Genetics</strong> 154:885-891.<br />
Yano M, Harushima Y, Nagamura Y, Kurata N, M<strong>in</strong>obe Y, Sasaki T.<br />
1997. Identification of quantitative trait loci controll<strong>in</strong>g head<strong>in</strong>g<br />
date <strong>in</strong> rice us<strong>in</strong>g a high-density l<strong>in</strong>kage map. Theor. Appl.<br />
Genet. 95:1025-1032.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ addresses: Y. Fukuta, S. Kobayashi, H. Tsunematsu, A.<br />
Ebron, and H. Kato, Plant Breed<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>Genetics</strong>, and Biochemistry<br />
Division, <strong>International</strong> <strong>Rice</strong> Research Institute, DAPO<br />
Box 7777, Metro Manila, Philipp<strong>in</strong>es; T. Umemoto, Department<br />
of Lowland Farm<strong>in</strong>g, Tohoku, NAES, Ohmagari, Akita;<br />
S. Morita, Department of Upland Farm<strong>in</strong>g, Tohoku NAES,<br />
Fukushima, Fukushima; T. Sato, Institute of Gene Eco.,<br />
Tohoku University, Sendai, Miyagi; T. Yamaya, Faculty of<br />
Agriculture, Tohoku University, Sendai, Miyagi; T. Nagam<strong>in</strong>e,<br />
Department of Genetic Resources I, NIAR, Tsukuba, Ibaraki;<br />
T. Fukuyama, Faculty of Agriculture, Niigata University,<br />
Niigata, Niigata; H. Sasahara, I. Ashikawa, and K. Tamura,<br />
Department of <strong>Rice</strong> Research, Hokuriku NAES, Joetsu,<br />
Niigata; H. Nemoto and H. Maeda, Department of Crop Breed<strong>in</strong>g,<br />
Chugoku, NAES, Fukuyama, Hiroshima; K. Hamamura,<br />
Arid Land Research Center, Tottori University, Hamasaki,<br />
Tottori; T. Ogata and Y. Matsue, Crop Protection Research<br />
Institute, Fukuoka ARC, Fukuoka, Fukuoka; K. Itchitani and<br />
A. Takagi, Faculty of Agriculture, Kagoshima University,<br />
Kagoshima, Japan.<br />
Molecular markers, QTL mapp<strong>in</strong>g, and marker-assisted selection 235
No. of l<strong>in</strong>es<br />
40<br />
99 Ohmagari<br />
A<br />
M23<br />
20<br />
n = 190<br />
A<br />
M23<br />
40<br />
99 Sendai<br />
20<br />
n = 190<br />
40<br />
99 Niigata<br />
A<br />
M23<br />
20<br />
n = 187<br />
50<br />
99 Joetsu<br />
A<br />
M23<br />
25<br />
n = 188<br />
40<br />
99 Tsukuba<br />
A<br />
M23<br />
20<br />
n = 185<br />
30<br />
99 Tottori<br />
A<br />
M23<br />
10<br />
n = 190<br />
30<br />
99 Fukuyama<br />
n = 188<br />
A<br />
M23<br />
10<br />
50<br />
99 Fukuoka<br />
A<br />
M23<br />
25<br />
n = 190<br />
20<br />
10<br />
A<br />
99 Kagoshima<br />
n = 190<br />
M23<br />
20<br />
A<br />
M23<br />
99 Dry Los Baños<br />
10<br />
n = 188<br />
40 55 70 85 100<br />
Days to head<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Fig. 2. Segregation for head<strong>in</strong>g date <strong>in</strong> Japan (1999) and the Philipp<strong>in</strong>es (2000 dry<br />
season).<br />
236 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
LOD<br />
2.0<br />
0.0<br />
2.01<br />
A<br />
0.0<br />
–2.0<br />
A<br />
2.0<br />
0.0<br />
2.0<br />
2.89<br />
3.70<br />
B<br />
C<br />
0.0<br />
–2.0<br />
–8.91<br />
–<br />
B<br />
0.0<br />
2.0<br />
0.0<br />
3.49<br />
9.52<br />
D<br />
E<br />
0.0<br />
–2.0<br />
–6.83<br />
–4.60<br />
C<br />
0.0<br />
–2.0<br />
D<br />
2.0<br />
–7.00<br />
0.0<br />
2.0<br />
0.0<br />
2.0<br />
4.95<br />
6.51<br />
F<br />
G<br />
0.0<br />
–2.0<br />
0.0<br />
–2.0<br />
–3.84<br />
–4.45<br />
E<br />
F<br />
0.0<br />
9.28<br />
H<br />
0.0<br />
–1.36<br />
G<br />
2.0<br />
0.0<br />
–2.0<br />
–3.92<br />
H<br />
0.0<br />
12.83<br />
I<br />
0.0<br />
–2.0<br />
–2.20<br />
I<br />
0.0<br />
–1.13<br />
J<br />
2.0<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
0.52<br />
C213<br />
N622U<br />
XNpb379<br />
C507<br />
NASL56<br />
XNpb117<br />
XNpb152<br />
C451<br />
XNpb91<br />
XNpb33<br />
R643b<br />
XNpb338c<br />
R2401<br />
C1057<br />
N1165R<br />
XNpb50<br />
Chr. 7<br />
J<br />
XNpb42b<br />
XNpb142b<br />
XNpb335a<br />
XNpb189a<br />
NSSK190<br />
C477<br />
XNpb320<br />
C734c<br />
XNpb179<br />
N099K<br />
XNpb202<br />
XNpb257<br />
Chr. 11<br />
C1172<br />
C1003a<br />
XNpb181<br />
G2132a<br />
Fig. 3. Interval mapp<strong>in</strong>g on chromosomes<br />
7 and 11. Plus and m<strong>in</strong>us<br />
values of LOD score <strong>in</strong>dicate positive<br />
gene functions for late head<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>in</strong> Milyang 23 and Akihikari homozygotes,<br />
respectively. Data summary<br />
from various sites <strong>in</strong> 1999: A =<br />
Ohmagari, B = Sendai-1, C =<br />
Niigata, D = Joetsu, E = Tsukuba, F<br />
= Totori, G = Fukuyama, H =<br />
Fukuoka, I = Kagoshima and Los<br />
Baños dur<strong>in</strong>g 2000 dry season.<br />
Molecular markers, QTL mapp<strong>in</strong>g, and marker-assisted selection 237
Mapp<strong>in</strong>g quantitative trait loci controll<strong>in</strong>g<br />
head<strong>in</strong>g date <strong>in</strong> rice<br />
K. Fuj<strong>in</strong>o, T. Sato, H. Kiuchi, H. Kikuchi, Y. Nonoue, Y. Takeuchi, S.Y. L<strong>in</strong>, and M. Yano<br />
Quantitative trait loci (QTLs) for head<strong>in</strong>g date were <strong>in</strong>vestigated us<strong>in</strong>g 122 BC 1<br />
F 5<br />
l<strong>in</strong>es from the cross between Hayamasari and<br />
Italica Livorno, both temperate japonicas. Analysis revealed the existence of only one QTL with a large effect, near marker<br />
C596 on chromosome 7. The Italica Livorno allele at this QTL <strong>in</strong>creased days to head<strong>in</strong>g. This QTL expla<strong>in</strong>ed about 30% of the<br />
phenotypic variation <strong>in</strong> BC 1<br />
F 5<br />
l<strong>in</strong>es. In multiple-QTL analysis with a major QTL near C596, an additional five QTLs with small<br />
phenotypic effects were found. Four QTLs near C67a, C235, S954, and S1786 were mapped on chromosomes 1, 6, 7, and<br />
12, respectively. The chromosomal location of one QTL near C249 was not identified. The Italica Livorno alleles <strong>in</strong>creased days<br />
to head<strong>in</strong>g for all these QTLs except for the one near S954.<br />
<strong>Rice</strong> is grown under various climatic conditions. When commercial<br />
rice varieties are developed, it is important that their<br />
maturity match the particular environment <strong>in</strong> which they are<br />
grown. In Hokkaido, the northernmost rice cultivation region<br />
(42–45°N latitude) <strong>in</strong> Japan, only extremely early matur<strong>in</strong>g<br />
varieties are adapted. The efficient manipulation of head<strong>in</strong>g<br />
date is a critical component of rice improvement efforts. By<br />
us<strong>in</strong>g molecular techniques, many quantitative trait loci (QTLs)<br />
for head<strong>in</strong>g date have been identified. In these studies, where<br />
a high level of DNA polymorphism is expected, genetically<br />
diverse crosses were used as materials and QTLs with large<br />
effects were found (Yano and Sasaki 1997). However, early<br />
matur<strong>in</strong>g varieties have not been used as parental l<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong> previous<br />
QTL studies. We have conducted QTL analysis for head<strong>in</strong>g<br />
date us<strong>in</strong>g recomb<strong>in</strong>ant <strong>in</strong>bred l<strong>in</strong>es derived from the cross<br />
Hayamasari/Italica Livorno.<br />
Materials and methods<br />
Two rice varieties, Hayamasari (early matur<strong>in</strong>g) from Hokkaido<br />
and Italica Livorno (late-matur<strong>in</strong>g) from Italy, were used as<br />
parental l<strong>in</strong>es of the mapp<strong>in</strong>g population. Both varieties are<br />
classified as temperate japonica. The F 1 (Hayamasari/Italica<br />
Livorno) was crossed with Hayamasari to produce BC 1 F 1 seeds.<br />
One hundred and twenty-two BC 1 F 5 l<strong>in</strong>es were developed from<br />
the BC 1 F 1 plants by the s<strong>in</strong>gle-seed descent method. The 122<br />
BC 1 F 5 l<strong>in</strong>es and their two parental l<strong>in</strong>es were grown under<br />
natural field conditions <strong>in</strong> Naganuma (43°N latitude),<br />
Hokkaido, Japan. One representative plant was randomly selected<br />
from each BC 1 F 5 l<strong>in</strong>e. Each plant was monitored for<br />
date of appearance of the first panicle and the number of days<br />
from sow<strong>in</strong>g to head<strong>in</strong>g was used for QTL analysis. A leaf<br />
sample was also collected from selected plants for DNA extraction.<br />
All experimental procedures for DNA extraction, Southern<br />
blott<strong>in</strong>g, and hybridization have been described previously<br />
by Kurata et al (1994). Six hundred and eighty-five clones<br />
were selected from the high-density l<strong>in</strong>kage map (Harushima<br />
et al 1998) as probes for the restriction fragment length polymorphism<br />
(RFLP) analysis. L<strong>in</strong>kage groups and the order of<br />
markers were determ<strong>in</strong>ed us<strong>in</strong>g MAPMAKER/EXP (Lander<br />
et al 1987). S<strong>in</strong>ce MAPMAKER/EXP did not <strong>in</strong>clude an option<br />
for backcross <strong>in</strong>bred l<strong>in</strong>es, the “F 2 <strong>in</strong>tercross” mode was<br />
employed <strong>in</strong> the analysis. The MAPMAKER/QTL software<br />
(Lander and Botste<strong>in</strong> 1989, L<strong>in</strong>coln et al 1993) was used to<br />
estimate phenotypic effects of Italica Livorno alleles at detected<br />
QTLs us<strong>in</strong>g the F 2 backcross mode. A log of odds (LOD)<br />
score of 2.0 was used as the threshold to detect QTLs. A multiple-QTL<br />
model exam<strong>in</strong>ation was also carried out.<br />
Results<br />
The mean value of days to head<strong>in</strong>g was 95 d (range 93–97) for<br />
Hayamasari and 113 d (range 111–115) for Italica Livorno.<br />
There was a large variation (range 85–123) <strong>in</strong> days to head<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>in</strong> the BC 1 F 5 l<strong>in</strong>es (Fig. 1). Transgressive segregants toward<br />
late head<strong>in</strong>g were also observed. This distribution suggested<br />
that one major gene was <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> the segregation for head<strong>in</strong>g<br />
date <strong>in</strong> this population. However, there was still a large<br />
variation <strong>in</strong> the early and late classes, suggest<strong>in</strong>g that some<br />
additional factors (genes) might be <strong>in</strong>volved.<br />
A parental RFLP survey was conducted us<strong>in</strong>g 685<br />
probes, and 113 (16.5%) probes showed polymorphism between<br />
Hayamasari and Italica Livorno. Of these 113 probes,<br />
23 showed polymorphism of m<strong>in</strong>or bands. To avoid unreliable<br />
genotyp<strong>in</strong>g of BC 1 F 5 l<strong>in</strong>es, 90 probes were used to construct a<br />
l<strong>in</strong>kage map (Fig. 2). The constructed l<strong>in</strong>kage map covered<br />
about 30% of the rice high-density l<strong>in</strong>kage map (Fig. 2).<br />
In the analysis of the s<strong>in</strong>gle-QTL model, only one QTL<br />
(LOD = 9.7) was found to be located near marker C596 on<br />
chromosome 7 (Table 1). The additive effect of the Italica<br />
Livorno allele at this QTL was 11.2 d and the percentage of<br />
variance expla<strong>in</strong>ed was 31.2%. An additional five QTLs, with<br />
relatively small phenotypic effects, were detected based on<br />
the multiple-QTL model with the QTL near C596 (Table 1).<br />
Four QTLs were mapped near C67a (chromosome 1), C235<br />
(chromosome 6), S954 (chromosome 7), and S1786 (chromosome<br />
12), respectively. The chromosomal location of the QTL<br />
near C249 was not identified because C249 showed no l<strong>in</strong>kage<br />
to other RFLP markers and the polymorphic DNA frag-<br />
238 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
No. of l<strong>in</strong>es<br />
20<br />
Hayamasari<br />
Italica Livorno<br />
15<br />
10<br />
5<br />
0<br />
83 87 91 95 99 103 107 111 115 119 123<br />
Days to head<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Fig. 1. Frequency distribution of days to head<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the BC 1 F 5 l<strong>in</strong>es. Horizontal and<br />
vertical bars <strong>in</strong>dicate the ranges and means, respectively.<br />
cM 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12<br />
0<br />
50<br />
C235<br />
S954<br />
S1786<br />
100<br />
C596<br />
150<br />
C67a<br />
Fig. 2. RFLP l<strong>in</strong>kage map show<strong>in</strong>g locations of the putative QTLs detected from analysis of BC 1 F 5 l<strong>in</strong>es derived<br />
from the cross between Hayamasari and Italica Livorno. Solid area <strong>in</strong>dicates the l<strong>in</strong>kage groups constructed<br />
<strong>in</strong> the BC 1 F 5 l<strong>in</strong>es, display based on the rice high-density l<strong>in</strong>kage map (open area)(Harushima et al 1998).<br />
Table 1. Putative QTLs that control head<strong>in</strong>g date detected <strong>in</strong><br />
the BC 1 F 5 l<strong>in</strong>es of rice. a<br />
Marker loci<br />
Effects on the phenotype<br />
l<strong>in</strong>ked to Chromosome LOD<br />
QTL AE PVE<br />
C596 7 9.7 11.2 31.2<br />
C67a 1 12.3 5.7 37.8<br />
C235 6 11.9 4.9 37.0<br />
S954 7 12.4 –6.1 38.4<br />
S1786 12 11.9 5.5 36.5<br />
C249 – 11.8 5.0 36.8<br />
a C596 was detected <strong>in</strong> the scann<strong>in</strong>g analysis us<strong>in</strong>g the s<strong>in</strong>gle-QTL model. Others<br />
were detected <strong>in</strong> the multiple-QTL model with C596. LOD = log likelihood<br />
value calculated by MAPMAKER/QTL software <strong>in</strong> the “F 2 backcross” mode; AE<br />
= additive effect of Italica Livorno allele on days to head<strong>in</strong>g; PVE = percent of<br />
total phenotypic variation expla<strong>in</strong>ed by the QTL (all QTLs except for C596 are<br />
cumulative values <strong>in</strong> the multiple-QTL model).<br />
ments were different from those previously reported<br />
(Harushima et al 1998). These five QTLs expla<strong>in</strong>ed about 5.3–<br />
7.2% of the phenotypic variance and had additive effects of<br />
about 4.9–6.1 d. The Italica Livorno alleles <strong>in</strong>creased days to<br />
head<strong>in</strong>g for all of these QTLs except for the one near S954.<br />
Discussion<br />
Among the current commercial rice cultivars <strong>in</strong> Hokkaido,<br />
variation <strong>in</strong> head<strong>in</strong>g date is only about 10 d from early to latematur<strong>in</strong>g<br />
types. The genes for head<strong>in</strong>g date correspond<strong>in</strong>g to<br />
early, middle-, and late-matur<strong>in</strong>g types are multiple alleles of<br />
the photoperiod sensitivity–related gene (Fuj<strong>in</strong>o, unpublished<br />
data). Five of the six QTLs identified <strong>in</strong> this study had an additive<br />
effect of 4.9–6.1 d. If these QTLs for head<strong>in</strong>g date were<br />
used for rice breed<strong>in</strong>g programs <strong>in</strong> Hokkaido, genetic variations<br />
<strong>in</strong> head<strong>in</strong>g date would be large. Molecular markers will<br />
Molecular markers, QTL mapp<strong>in</strong>g, and marker-assisted selection 239
allow us to manipulate these QTLs for head<strong>in</strong>g date more easily<br />
than with phenotypic selection. However, it should be noted<br />
that we estimated the effects of these QTLs us<strong>in</strong>g a s<strong>in</strong>gle population.<br />
The general utility of these QTLs will depend on their<br />
expression <strong>in</strong> other genetic backgrounds.<br />
The QTL near C596 on chromosome 7, with a relatively<br />
large effect, was located at the distal end of the l<strong>in</strong>kage group.<br />
On the distal end of chromosome 7, Hd2 was already identified<br />
(Yano et al 1997). Both Hd2 and the QTL near C596 detected<br />
<strong>in</strong> this study were likely the same locus, based on their<br />
chromosomal location. The QTL with a small effect on head<strong>in</strong>g<br />
date was found to be located near C235 on chromosome 6.<br />
This QTL may correspond to Hd1 and Se-1, a major locus for<br />
photoperiod sensitivity (Yano et al 1997, Yamamoto et al 1998).<br />
The QTL near C67a on chromosome 1 was detected <strong>in</strong> almost<br />
the same region as hd-1 found <strong>in</strong> the doubled-haploid population<br />
of Zhai-Ye-Q<strong>in</strong>g 8/J<strong>in</strong>g-Xi 17 (Lu et al 1996). Further<br />
analysis will be necessary to clarify the allelic relationship<br />
between known genes and the QTLs identified <strong>in</strong> this study.<br />
Other QTLs near S954 on chromosome 7 and those near S1786<br />
on chromosome 12 were not located <strong>in</strong> regions where QTLs<br />
for head<strong>in</strong>g date had been identified previously.<br />
References<br />
Harushima Y, Yano M, Shomura A, Sato M, Shimano T, Kuboki Y,<br />
Yamamoto T, L<strong>in</strong> SY, Antonio BA, Parco A, Kajiya H, Huang<br />
N, Yamamoto K, Nagamura Y, Kurata N, Khush GS, Sasaki<br />
T. 1998. A high-density rice genetic l<strong>in</strong>kage map with 2275<br />
markers us<strong>in</strong>g a s<strong>in</strong>gle F 2 population. <strong>Genetics</strong> 148:479-494.<br />
Kurata N, Nagamura Y, Yamamoto K, Harushima Y, Sue N, Wu J,<br />
Antonio BA, Shomura A, Shimizu T, L<strong>in</strong> S-Y, Inoue T, Fukuda<br />
A, Shimano T, Kuboki Y, Toyama T, Miyamoto Y, Kirihara T,<br />
Hayasaka K, Miyao A, Monna L, Zhong HS, Tamura Y, Wang<br />
Z-X, Momma T, Umehara Y, Yano M, Sasaki T, M<strong>in</strong>obe Y.<br />
1994. A 300-kilobase <strong>in</strong>terval genetic map of rice <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g<br />
883 expressed sequences. Nat. Genet. 8:365-372.<br />
Lander ES, Green P, Abrahamson J, Barlow A, Daly MJ, L<strong>in</strong>coln<br />
SE, Newburg L. 1987. MAPMAKER: an <strong>in</strong>teractive computer<br />
package for construct<strong>in</strong>g primary genetic l<strong>in</strong>kage maps of experimental<br />
and natural populations. Genomics 1:174-181.<br />
Lander ES, Botste<strong>in</strong> D. 1989. Mapp<strong>in</strong>g Mendelian factors underly<strong>in</strong>g<br />
quantitative traits us<strong>in</strong>g RFLP l<strong>in</strong>kage maps. <strong>Genetics</strong><br />
121:185-199.<br />
L<strong>in</strong>coln S, Daly M, Lander E. 1993. Mapp<strong>in</strong>g genes controll<strong>in</strong>g quantitative<br />
traits with MAPMAKER/QTL 1.1: a tutorial and reference<br />
manual. 2nd ed. Whitehead Institute Technical Report.<br />
Lu C, Shen L, Tan Z, Xu Y, He P, Chen Y, Zhu L. 1996. Comparative<br />
mapp<strong>in</strong>g of QTLs for agronomic traits of rice across environments<br />
us<strong>in</strong>g a doubled haploid population. Theor. Appl.<br />
Genet. 93:1211-1217.<br />
Yamamoto T, Kuboki Y, L<strong>in</strong> SY, Sasaki T, Yano M. 1998. F<strong>in</strong>e mapp<strong>in</strong>g<br />
of quantitative trait loci Hd-1, Hd-2 and Hd-3, controll<strong>in</strong>g<br />
head<strong>in</strong>g date of rice, as s<strong>in</strong>gle Mendelian factors. Theor.<br />
Appl. Genet. 97:37-44.<br />
Yano M, Harushima Y, Nagamura Y, Kurata N, M<strong>in</strong>obe Y, Sasaki T.<br />
1997. Identification of quantitative trait loci controll<strong>in</strong>g head<strong>in</strong>g<br />
date <strong>in</strong> rice us<strong>in</strong>g a high-density l<strong>in</strong>kage map. Theor. Appl.<br />
Genet. 95:1025-1032.<br />
Yano M, Sasaki T. 1997. Genetic and molecular dissection of quantitative<br />
traits <strong>in</strong> rice. Plant Mol. Biol. 35:145-153.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ addresses: K. Fuj<strong>in</strong>o and T. Sato, Hokkaido Green-Bio<br />
Institute, Naganuma 069-1301; H. Kiuchi and H. Kikuchi,<br />
Hokkaido Prefecture Kamikawa Agricultural Experiment Station,<br />
Pippu 078-0397; Y. Nonoue, Y. Takeuchi, S.Y. L<strong>in</strong>, and<br />
M. Yano, <strong>Rice</strong> Genome Research Program, NIAR/STAFF,<br />
Tsukuba 305-8602, Japan.<br />
Acknowledgment: This work was supported by a grant from the M<strong>in</strong>istry<br />
of Agriculture, Forestry, and Fisheries of Japan (<strong>Rice</strong><br />
Genome Project DM-1202).<br />
QTL analysis for head<strong>in</strong>g date us<strong>in</strong>g recomb<strong>in</strong>ant<br />
<strong>in</strong>bred l<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong> rice<br />
M. Oda, H. Yasui, and A. Yoshimura<br />
We developed two sets of recomb<strong>in</strong>ant <strong>in</strong>bred l<strong>in</strong>es (RILs). The first one, RIC, was derived from a cross between japonica<br />
cultivar Taichung 65 and <strong>in</strong>dica cultivar DV85. The second one, RID, was derived from a cross between japonica cultivar<br />
Taichung 65 and <strong>in</strong>dica cultivar ARC10313. To <strong>in</strong>vestigate quantitative trait loci (QTLs) for head<strong>in</strong>g date, 123 l<strong>in</strong>es of RIC (F 9<br />
generation) and 136 l<strong>in</strong>es of RID (F 10<br />
generation) were genotyped us<strong>in</strong>g 116 and 89 restriction fragment length polymorphism<br />
(RFLP) markers, respectively. In RIC, segregation distortions were found on 7 of the 12 rice chromosomes. In RID, distortions<br />
were observed on 4 of 12 rice chromosomes. Three QTLs for head<strong>in</strong>g date were detected on chromosomes 4, 5, and 10<br />
(P
Number of plants<br />
A<br />
DV85 Taichung 65 35 B 25 C<br />
16<br />
30<br />
N = 135<br />
N = 128<br />
N = 105<br />
20<br />
25<br />
ARC10313 Taichung 65<br />
12<br />
Taichung 65<br />
20 ARC10313<br />
15<br />
8<br />
4<br />
15<br />
10<br />
5<br />
10<br />
5<br />
0 0<br />
0<br />
82 94 106 118 92 104 116 128 82 94 106 118<br />
88 100 112<br />
98 110 122 134<br />
88 100 112<br />
Days to head<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Fig. 1. Frequency distributions for days to head<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> RIC at the second sow<strong>in</strong>g (A), <strong>in</strong> RID at the first<br />
sow<strong>in</strong>g (B), and <strong>in</strong> RID at the second sow<strong>in</strong>g (C).<br />
Days to head<strong>in</strong>g is an important agronomic trait of rice because<br />
it is highly associated with regional and seasonal adaptability<br />
of rice cultivars. To <strong>in</strong>vestigate the genetic basis of head<strong>in</strong>g<br />
behavior <strong>in</strong> rice, we developed two series of recomb<strong>in</strong>ant<br />
<strong>in</strong>bred l<strong>in</strong>es (RILs) derived from two crosses between japonica<br />
and <strong>in</strong>dica cultivars. In this study, we describe the construction<br />
of a new series of RILs and QTL analysis for head<strong>in</strong>g<br />
date.<br />
Materials and methods<br />
Two <strong>in</strong>dica cultivars, DV85 and ARC10313, were crossed to<br />
japonica cultivar Taichung 65, us<strong>in</strong>g Taichung 65 as the female<br />
parent. RILs were developed from these two crosses:<br />
Taichung 65/DV85 (123 F 9 l<strong>in</strong>es) and Taichung 65/ARC10313<br />
(136 F 10 l<strong>in</strong>es). In this paper, the former was named RIC and<br />
the latter was called RID.<br />
The two RIL seeds were sown on 1 May 1999 (first sow<strong>in</strong>g,<br />
about 13.5 h daylength) and on 26 May 1999 (second<br />
sow<strong>in</strong>g, about 14.5 h daylength) <strong>in</strong> Fukuoka, Japan. Seedl<strong>in</strong>gs<br />
were transplanted on 7 June for the first sow<strong>in</strong>g and on 26<br />
June for the second sow<strong>in</strong>g. RIC was tested at the second sow<strong>in</strong>g<br />
and RID was tested at the first and second sow<strong>in</strong>g. Head<strong>in</strong>g<br />
date of 10 <strong>in</strong>dividual plants of each RIL was recorded when<br />
the first spikelet of the panicle emerged at the base of each<br />
flag leaf. Days to head<strong>in</strong>g were expressed as the number of<br />
days from seed sow<strong>in</strong>g to head<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
The DNA of each l<strong>in</strong>e was extracted and used for restriction<br />
fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) l<strong>in</strong>kage map<br />
construction. RFLP probes (Harushima et al 1998) were supplied<br />
by the <strong>Rice</strong> Genome Program of Japan. RFLPs among<br />
the parents were surveyed us<strong>in</strong>g six enzymes (BamHI, BglII,<br />
DraI, EcoRI, EcoRV, and H<strong>in</strong>dIII). A total of 116 RFLP markers<br />
for RIC and 89 for RID were selected to construct the l<strong>in</strong>kage<br />
map. QTL analysis for head<strong>in</strong>g date was conducted us<strong>in</strong>g<br />
the QGENE v.2.29 (Nelson 1997), a software for DNA markerbased<br />
genetic analysis on Mac<strong>in</strong>tosh.®<br />
Results and discussion<br />
Two RFLP l<strong>in</strong>kage maps were constructed based on RFLP<br />
marker segregation <strong>in</strong> the respective RILs. RIC and RID l<strong>in</strong>kage<br />
maps <strong>in</strong>volved 116 and 89 RFLP markers, respectively. In<br />
RIC, segregation distortions were observed <strong>in</strong> chromosomes<br />
1, 4, 5, 6, 9, 10, and 11. In RID, distortions were noted on<br />
chromosomes 3, 6, 10, and 11.<br />
Frequency distributions for days to head<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> two RIL<br />
populations are shown <strong>in</strong> Figure 1. These data were comb<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
with the RFLP genotype of each RIL and loaded to QGENE<br />
v.2.29 (Nelson 1997). Loci affect<strong>in</strong>g days to head<strong>in</strong>g were estimated<br />
us<strong>in</strong>g the s<strong>in</strong>gle-po<strong>in</strong>t command of the QGENE.<br />
In RIC, three QTLs (P
Table 1. QTLs of head<strong>in</strong>g date detected <strong>in</strong> RIC at the second sow<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
RFLP locus<br />
Days to head<strong>in</strong>g<br />
near QTL F P c Additive d<br />
(chromosome) AA a (N) aa b (N)<br />
R288 (4) 98.9 (47) 96.0 (52) 8.59 0.004*** 1.5<br />
C1402 (5) 95.3 (51) 99.0 (52) 12.82 0.001*** –1.8<br />
R1877 (10) 99.5 (52) 94.7 (49) 23.00
Table 2. QTLs of head<strong>in</strong>g date detected <strong>in</strong> RID at the first and second sow<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
RFLP locus<br />
Days to head<strong>in</strong>g<br />
near QTL F P c Additive d<br />
(chromosome) AA a (N) aa b (N)<br />
First sow<strong>in</strong>g<br />
XNpb311 (4) 111.9 (70) 108.9 (63) 8.42 0.004*** 1.5<br />
C213 (7) 112.1 (73) 108.5 (59) 12.16 0.001*** 1.8<br />
R1629 (10) 112.8 (41) 109.3 (79) 8.88 0.004*** 1.7<br />
C1166 (10) 113.5 (51) 108.7 (80) 21.69
found on the same position on the long arm of chromosome 4 and the two loci were localized between the two RFLP loci,<br />
XNpb264 and XNpb197. The genetic distance between XNpb264 and Hwc-2 and that between Hwc-2 and XNpb197 was 0.7<br />
cM and 2.0 cM, respectively. The Ph locus controls phenol color reaction of hulls, which is one criterion for classify<strong>in</strong>g cultivars<br />
<strong>in</strong>to <strong>in</strong>dica and japonica.<br />
The F 1 weakness found <strong>in</strong> the crosses of Peruvian rice cultivar<br />
Jamaica and Japanese lowland cultivars is controlled by a set<br />
of complementary genes, Hwc-1 and Hwc-2. The prom<strong>in</strong>ent<br />
feature of this hybrid weakness lies with the peculiar root<br />
growth <strong>in</strong>hibition, which is expressed soon after germ<strong>in</strong>ation.<br />
Hwc-1 and Hwc-2 are carried by Jamaica and Japanese lowland<br />
cultivars, respectively. The geographical distribution of<br />
the Hwc-2 gene surveyed <strong>in</strong> Asian native cultivars showed that<br />
this gene is common among temperate japonicas but not among<br />
tropical japonicas or <strong>in</strong>dicas. From these results, Sato and<br />
Morishima (1988) assumed that the Hwc-2 gene orig<strong>in</strong>ated <strong>in</strong><br />
an early stage of differentiation of temperate japonica types.<br />
Isozyme and molecular marker analyses <strong>in</strong>dicated that <strong>in</strong>dicas<br />
and japonicas are easily differentiated, but temperate and tropical<br />
japonicas are not (Glaszmann 1987, Mackill 1995). Hwc-<br />
2 may thus be a key gene for the differentiation of japonica<br />
cultivars <strong>in</strong>to temperate and tropical types. In this study, the<br />
chromosomal location of the Hwc-2 locus was determ<strong>in</strong>ed by<br />
us<strong>in</strong>g recomb<strong>in</strong>ant <strong>in</strong>bred (RI) l<strong>in</strong>es segregat<strong>in</strong>g for the locus.<br />
Materials and methods<br />
The RI l<strong>in</strong>es have been developed by Fukuta et al (1999) from<br />
the cross between Akihikari and Milyang 23. Akihikari is a<br />
temperate japonica cultivar from Japan and carries the Hwc-2<br />
gene. Milyang 23 is an <strong>in</strong>dica cultivar from Korea and carries<br />
neither the Hwc-1 nor Hwc-2 gene. Genotypes of 183 restriction<br />
fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) loci almost cover<strong>in</strong>g<br />
the whole rice genome have been identified for a set of<br />
191 RI l<strong>in</strong>es, and an RFLP l<strong>in</strong>kage map was constructed based<br />
on them (Fukuta et al 1999). A total of 127 randomly chosen<br />
RI l<strong>in</strong>es were crossed to the Hwc-1 carrier Jamaica as a pollen<br />
donor, except for a few crosses. Then each RI l<strong>in</strong>e was estimated<br />
to be an Hwc-2 carrier if the F 1 plants showed <strong>in</strong>hibition<br />
of root elongation, and an Hwc-2 carrier if they showed<br />
normal root elongation. L<strong>in</strong>kage analysis between Hwc-2 and<br />
RFLP markers was performed us<strong>in</strong>g the computer program<br />
MAPMAKER/EXP 3.0 (Lander et al 1987).<br />
Phenol reaction, used to classify cultivars <strong>in</strong>to <strong>in</strong>dica and<br />
japonica, is controlled by a gene at the Ph locus on chromosome<br />
4. Milyang 23 carries the dom<strong>in</strong>ant allele Ph, while<br />
Akihikari carries the recessive allele ph. To know the l<strong>in</strong>kage<br />
between the Ph and Hwc-2 loci, phenol reaction of the RI l<strong>in</strong>es<br />
was exam<strong>in</strong>ed. The color of hulls after soak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> 3% phenol<br />
solution for 3 d and dry<strong>in</strong>g overnight was scored. L<strong>in</strong>es whose<br />
hulls turned black carried the Ph allele, whereas l<strong>in</strong>es whose<br />
hulls had the orig<strong>in</strong>al color carried the ph allele.<br />
Shiozawa et al (1993) reported that hybrid weakness was<br />
recovered by high-temperature treatment <strong>in</strong> the cross between<br />
Nor<strong>in</strong> 8 and Jamaica. In this study, the effect of high temperature<br />
on the expression of hybrid weakness was <strong>in</strong>vestigated <strong>in</strong><br />
reciprocal crosses between Akihikari and Jamaica. The seeds<br />
of F 1 and parent cultivars were soaked <strong>in</strong> water at 28 °C for 3<br />
d. Then, half of them were transferred under 34 °C conditions.<br />
Four days later, root length of each plant was measured.<br />
Results and discussion<br />
Mapp<strong>in</strong>g the Hwc-2 locus<br />
The l<strong>in</strong>kage analysis with MAPMAKER/EXP 3.0 showed that<br />
the Hwc-2 and Ph loci were on the same position on the long<br />
arm of chromosome 4 and that the two loci were localized<br />
between the two RFLP loci, XNpb264 and XNpb197. The genetic<br />
distance between XNpb264 and Hwc-2 was 0.7 cM and<br />
that between Hwc-2 and XNpb197 was 2.0 cM. From a phylogenetic<br />
po<strong>in</strong>t of view, it is <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g that the Hwc-2 and Ph<br />
loci, both of which have been associated with varietal differentiation,<br />
are closely l<strong>in</strong>ked to each other. The Hwc-2 gene<br />
does not express weakness by itself. To our knowledge, neither<br />
a positive or negative effect of Ph gene expression on<br />
adaptation has been reported. Therefore, these genes <strong>in</strong> themselves<br />
are not considered to be caus<strong>in</strong>g or promot<strong>in</strong>g varietal<br />
differentiation. Proximal to the Ph locus exist many loci controll<strong>in</strong>g<br />
adaptability. These are Sh3 controll<strong>in</strong>g the shatter<strong>in</strong>g<br />
habit, Spr3(t) controll<strong>in</strong>g panicle spread, Pikur1 controll<strong>in</strong>g<br />
blast resistance, and Xa1, Xa2, and Xa12 controll<strong>in</strong>g bacterial<br />
blight resistance. These facts suggest that the adaptability-genecomplex<br />
rather than Hwc-2 or Ph might cause or promote varietal<br />
differentiation <strong>in</strong> a way that some gene comb<strong>in</strong>ations are<br />
suitable for areas where tropical japonica is predom<strong>in</strong>ant and<br />
others for areas where temperate japonica is predom<strong>in</strong>ant. The<br />
genes on Hwc-2 and Ph loci might be mutated and dragged by<br />
surround<strong>in</strong>g gene comb<strong>in</strong>ations.<br />
Physiology of hybrid weakness and future prospects<br />
Hybrid weakness expressed <strong>in</strong> the reciprocal crosses between<br />
Akihikari and Jamaica was recovered by 34 °C treatment (Table<br />
1). The effect of high temperature is larger <strong>in</strong> the cross<br />
Akihikari/Jamaica, suggest<strong>in</strong>g the existence of a maternal or<br />
cytoplasmic effect. The results of Shiozawa et al (1993) and<br />
this study <strong>in</strong>dicate that hybrid weakness offers a good experimental<br />
system for the response to temperature. Clon<strong>in</strong>g of the<br />
Hwc-2 gene will contribute much to understand<strong>in</strong>g this as well<br />
as varietal differentiation. This gene has three advantages for<br />
map-based clon<strong>in</strong>g: (1) yeast artificial chromosome (YAC)<br />
contigs composed of three YACs (Y2186, Y5056, and Y5212)<br />
cover the chromosomal region where the Hwc-2 locus resides<br />
(Kurata et al 1997); (2) RFLP markers, many of which are<br />
cDNA clones, are condensed on the region; and (3) s<strong>in</strong>ce the<br />
symptoms of hybrid weakness appear soon after germ<strong>in</strong>ation,<br />
244 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
Table 1. Effect of high temperature on root elongation.<br />
Root length (cm)<br />
Hybrid<br />
and Normal High<br />
parenttemperature temperature<br />
(28 °C) (34 °C)<br />
Akihikari/Jamaica 1.70 ± 0.24 a 10.28 ± 0.33<br />
Jamaica/Akihikari 1.24 ± 0.37 4.56 ± 0.86<br />
Jamaica/Akihikari 9.38 ± 1.29 9.56 ± 0.59<br />
6.70 ± 0.98 7.66 ± 0.99<br />
a Data represent the mean ±SE root length of five plants that had been germ<strong>in</strong>ated<br />
at 28 °C for 3 d and had been under each temperature treatment for 4<br />
d.<br />
a large segregat<strong>in</strong>g population can be exam<strong>in</strong>ed. The results<br />
of this study will be useful as a start<strong>in</strong>g po<strong>in</strong>t for the clon<strong>in</strong>g of<br />
Hwc-2.<br />
References<br />
Fukuta Y, Tamura K, Sasahara H, Fukuyama T. 1999. Genetic and<br />
breed<strong>in</strong>g analysis us<strong>in</strong>g molecular marker. 18. Variations of<br />
gene frequency and the RFLP map of the hybrid population<br />
derived from the cross between the rice variety Milyang 23<br />
and Akihikari. Breed. Res. 1(suppl. 2):176.<br />
Glaszmann JC. 1987. Isozymes and classification of Asian rice varieties.<br />
Theor. Appl. Genet. 74:21-30.<br />
Kurata N, Umehara Y, Tanoue H, Sasaki T. 1997. Physical mapp<strong>in</strong>g<br />
of the rice genome with YAC clones. Plant Mol. Biol. 35:101-<br />
113.<br />
Lander ES, Green P, Abrahamson J, Barlow A, Daly MJ, L<strong>in</strong>coln<br />
SE, Newburg L. 1987. MAPMAKER: an <strong>in</strong>teractive computer<br />
package for construct<strong>in</strong>g primary genetic l<strong>in</strong>kage maps<br />
of experimental and natural populations. Genomics 1:174-181.<br />
Mackill DJ. 1995. Classify<strong>in</strong>g japonica rice cultivars with RAPD<br />
markers. Crop Sci. 35:889-894.<br />
Sato YI, Morishima H. 1988. Distribution of the genes caus<strong>in</strong>g F 2<br />
chlorosis <strong>in</strong> rice cultivars of the Indica and Japonica types.<br />
Theor. Appl. Genet. 75:723-727.<br />
Shiozawa M, Fujiwara S, Marubashi W, Niwa M. 1993. Effects of<br />
temperature on lethality of F 1 hybrid between Nor<strong>in</strong> 8 × Jamaica<br />
<strong>in</strong> rice (Oryza sativa L.). Jpn. J. Breed. 43(suppl. 2):264.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ addresses: K. Ichitani, K. Koba, and M. Sato, Faculty of<br />
Agriculture, Kagoshima University, 1-21-24 Korimoto,<br />
Kagoshima 890-0065, Japan; Y. Fukuta, <strong>International</strong> <strong>Rice</strong><br />
Research Institute, DAPO Box 7777, Metro Manila, Philipp<strong>in</strong>es;<br />
S. Taura, Gene Research Center, Kagoshima University,<br />
1-21-24 Korimoto, Kagoshima 890-0065, Japan.<br />
Molecular markers for detect<strong>in</strong>g bacterial blight resistance<br />
genes <strong>in</strong> ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>er l<strong>in</strong>es of rice hybrids<br />
L. Bor<strong>in</strong>es, E. Redoña, B. Porter, F. White, C. Vera Cruz, and H. Leung<br />
In the Philipp<strong>in</strong>es, hybrid rice breed<strong>in</strong>g has emphasized the enhancement of resistance to bacterial blight (BB) caused by<br />
Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae (Xoo) <strong>in</strong> parental l<strong>in</strong>es and hybrids. Early observations at the Philipp<strong>in</strong>e <strong>Rice</strong> Research Institute<br />
(Phil<strong>Rice</strong>) and <strong>in</strong>itial phenotyp<strong>in</strong>g us<strong>in</strong>g n<strong>in</strong>e races of Xoo showed that most of the ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ers, restorers, and hybrids are<br />
susceptible to most races of Xoo. Molecular markers l<strong>in</strong>ked to resistance genes can facilitate the pyramid<strong>in</strong>g of target genes,<br />
particularly <strong>in</strong> cases where the presence of one gene may be masked by the expression of another gene. We have applied<br />
marker-aided backcross<strong>in</strong>g to transfer and pyramid Xa4, Xa7, and Xa21 BB resistance genes from IRBB4/7 and IRBB21 to five<br />
ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>er l<strong>in</strong>es used for hybrid rice production <strong>in</strong> the Philipp<strong>in</strong>es. RFLP marker G1091 on chromosome 6 l<strong>in</strong>ked to Xa7 and the<br />
STS marker of the Xa21 gene (k<strong>in</strong>ase doma<strong>in</strong>) were used to facilitate the detection of Xa7 and Xa21 <strong>in</strong> backcross progenies.<br />
In addition, an AFLP marker (AFLP31-10) l<strong>in</strong>ked to Xa7 was identified by bulked segregant analysis. Us<strong>in</strong>g 154 BC 3<br />
F 2<br />
plants of<br />
the IR58025B/IRBB4/7 cross, AFLP31-10 was found to be l<strong>in</strong>ked to G1091, hence confirm<strong>in</strong>g its location on chromosome 6.<br />
AFLP31-10 is approximately 3 cM away from Xa7, whereas G1091 is about 7 cM away. Pyramids of Xa4 and Xa7 were<br />
obta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> five B l<strong>in</strong>e/IRBB4/7 BC 3<br />
F 2<br />
populations (
λH<strong>in</strong>dIII LianB Progenies<br />
IR24 IRBB4/7<br />
IR24 B D1 D2<br />
Progenies<br />
6.4 kb<br />
4.0 kb<br />
1.6 kb<br />
1.0 kb<br />
Fig. 1. G1091 marker used to detect Xa7 <strong>in</strong> the BC 3 F 1 progenies<br />
of the LianB/IRBB4/7 cross show<strong>in</strong>g the 4-kb band (resistant allele)<br />
and 6.4-kb band (susceptible allele).<br />
B—IR58025B<br />
D2—IRBB21<br />
D1—IRBB4/7<br />
Fig. 2. Xa21 STS marker used to detect the Xa21 gene <strong>in</strong> the<br />
BC 3 F 1 progenies of the cross of IR58025B with IRBB4/7 and<br />
IRBB21.<br />
Table 1. Mean lesion length (cm) of BC 3 F 2 plants of five ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>er/donor crosses conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g Xa4, Xa7, Xa4/<br />
7, and no genes <strong>in</strong> a pyramid together with controls <strong>in</strong>oculated with two diagnostic races of Xoo.<br />
Lesion length (cm)<br />
Cross Xa4 Xa7 Xa4/7 No gene<br />
PXO61 PXO86 PXO61 PXO86 PXO61 PXO86 PXO61 PXO86<br />
IR58025B/BB4/7 2.61 18.35 13.84 1.76 1.20 1.59 27.54 22.94<br />
IR62829B/BB4/7 4.57 14.87 7.22 2.05 1.61 0.45 13.22 23.76<br />
LianB/BB4/7 4.31 20.57 13.17 1.89 1.99 0.97 27.92 26.53<br />
913B/BB4/7 4.42 16.37 11.92 1.85 1.49 1.57 23.44 20.19<br />
BoB/BB4/7 – – 10.75 1.30 2.83 0.72 11.13 12.29<br />
IRBB4 7.58 22.67<br />
IRBB7 15.84 0.99<br />
IRBB4/7 1.17 1.34<br />
IR24 27.68 21.79<br />
One of the most important constra<strong>in</strong>ts <strong>in</strong> hybrid seed production<br />
is rice bacterial blight (BB) disease caused by<br />
Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae (Xoo). In hybrid seed production,<br />
flag-leaf cutt<strong>in</strong>g to facilitate poll<strong>in</strong>ation is tantamount<br />
to BB <strong>in</strong>oculation. Early observations at Phil<strong>Rice</strong> and <strong>in</strong>itial<br />
phenotyp<strong>in</strong>g revealed that most parental l<strong>in</strong>es and hybrids are<br />
susceptible to bacterial blight. The use of resistant (R) cultivars<br />
has been the most effective and economical way of controll<strong>in</strong>g<br />
BB. At least 23 resistance genes have been identified<br />
from cultivated rice and wild species.<br />
The identification of molecular markers closely l<strong>in</strong>ked<br />
to disease resistance genes would facilitate the efficient transfer<br />
of genes <strong>in</strong>to elite breed<strong>in</strong>g l<strong>in</strong>es and pyramid<strong>in</strong>g of BB<br />
resistance genes. Our aim is to <strong>in</strong>corporate and pyramid Xa4,<br />
Xa7, and Xa21 BB resistance genes <strong>in</strong> five ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>er (B) l<strong>in</strong>es<br />
of hybrid rice via marker-aided backcross<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
Materials and methods<br />
Two l<strong>in</strong>es, IRBB4/7 and IRBB21, that conta<strong>in</strong> the Xa4/7 and<br />
Xa21 genes were used as donors, whereas five B l<strong>in</strong>es from<br />
Phil<strong>Rice</strong> (IR58025B, IR62829B, LianB, 913B, and BoB)<br />
served as the recurrent parents <strong>in</strong> backcross<strong>in</strong>g. Pairwise<br />
crosses between each B l<strong>in</strong>e and donor were made until the<br />
BC 3 F 2 to obta<strong>in</strong> gene pyramids . Phenotyp<strong>in</strong>g was undertaken<br />
<strong>in</strong> each backcross generation and supplemented with markeraided<br />
selection to select the resistant progenies.<br />
Restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP)<br />
marker G1091 l<strong>in</strong>ked to Xa7 on chromosome 6 (Kaji and<br />
Ogawa 1995) and the sequence-tagged site (STS) marker of<br />
the Xa21 gene (k<strong>in</strong>ase doma<strong>in</strong>) were used to facilitate the detection<br />
of Xa7 and Xa21, respectively, <strong>in</strong> the backcross progenies<br />
(Figs. 1 and 2). An amplified fragment length polymorphism<br />
(AFLP) marker l<strong>in</strong>ked to Xa7 identified at Kansas State<br />
University through bulked segregant analysis was also used.<br />
This marker was optimized <strong>in</strong>to a nonradioactive protocol and<br />
the position relative to Xa7 and the G1091 marker was determ<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
us<strong>in</strong>g 154 BC 3 F 2 plants of the IR58025B/IRBB4/7 cross.<br />
Results and discussion<br />
Pyramids of Xa4 and Xa7 were successfully transferred to<br />
BC 3 F 2 plants of five B l<strong>in</strong>e/IRBB4/7 crosses. Plants conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />
both genes showed significantly shorter lesions (generally<br />
IR24 B D<br />
BC 3 F 2 progenies<br />
2.6 4.5 cM<br />
Xa7 AFLP31-10 G1091<br />
Fig. 4. Partial map of chromosome 6 show<strong>in</strong>g the arrangement<br />
of Xa7, AFLP-31-10, and RFLP marker G1091 as determ<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
from l<strong>in</strong>kage analysis us<strong>in</strong>g 154 BC 3 F 2 plants of<br />
the IR58025B/IRBB4/7 cross.<br />
S S R R R R S R S R R R S<br />
B–IR58025B D–IRBB4/7<br />
Fig. 3. AFLP31-10 marker DNA l<strong>in</strong>ked to the Xa7 gene show<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
314-bp resistant band and the slightly lower susceptible band<br />
result<strong>in</strong>g from a 5-bp deletion. R = resistant, S = susceptible.<br />
genes were comparable to those of the donor parent, IRBB4/<br />
7.<br />
Segregation of the Xa4 and Xa7 genes <strong>in</strong> four of the B<br />
l<strong>in</strong>e/IRBB4/7 crosses (IR58025B, IR62829B, LianB, and 913B<br />
with IRBB4/7) was <strong>in</strong>dependent and fitted the 9:3:3:1 ratio<br />
for both Xa4 and Xa7, Xa4 alone, Xa7 alone, and no genes,<br />
respectively. For the BoB/IRBB4/7 cross, plants did not show<br />
the same phenotypic segregation pattern (χ 2 = 24.8). Pyramids<br />
of Xa4, Xa7, and Xa21 genes were detected <strong>in</strong> the BC 3 F 1 plants<br />
of three B l<strong>in</strong>es crossed with IRBB4/7 and IRBB21 based on<br />
their phenotypic reactions to PXO61 (
Identify<strong>in</strong>g major genes and QTLs for field resistance<br />
to neck blast <strong>in</strong> rice<br />
S. Hittalmani, Sr<strong>in</strong>ivasachary, P. Bagali, and H.E. Shashidhar<br />
Neck blast caused by Pyricularia grisea is a serious fungal disease of rice. The doubled-haploid (DH) population of the cross<br />
IR64 (an <strong>in</strong>dica variety)/Azucena (a japonica variety) was screened for neck blast resistance under severely <strong>in</strong>fected field<br />
conditions. IR64 was resistant, with less than 0.5% <strong>in</strong>fection, whereas Azucena was susceptible, with up to 35% of the necks<br />
<strong>in</strong>fected. The 120 plants of the DH population had vary<strong>in</strong>g levels of <strong>in</strong>fection, from complete resistance (0% <strong>in</strong>fection) to<br />
complete susceptibility. MAPMAKER EXP identified a major gene, NBL1(t), on chromosome 11 associated with the Nbp44<br />
marker, with 11.4 cM distance, and RG167 and RG247 with 19.5 and 19.3 cM, respectively, at LOD 4.0. Three ma<strong>in</strong><br />
quantitative trait loci (QTLs) for neck blast were identified: chromosome 10 (qNBL-10), chromosome 9 (qNBL-9), and chromosome<br />
5 (qNBL-5). Digenic epistatic QTLs that were significant were located on chromosomes 11, 9, and 7. Total epistasis was<br />
44.9%. The ma<strong>in</strong>-effect QTL on chromosome 10 (qNBL-10) was highly significant (24.1% variation and LOD of 4.11). Both<br />
major genes and QTLs control field resistance to neck blast <strong>in</strong> rice.<br />
Neck blast (NB) <strong>in</strong> rice, caused by Pyricularia grisea Sacc., is<br />
the most serious fungal disease of rice. Unlike leaf blast, which<br />
normally <strong>in</strong>fects plants at the early stage, NB <strong>in</strong>fects plants at<br />
the reproductive stage and causes serious damage to the economic<br />
parts of plants. The disease <strong>in</strong>fects the panicle and causes<br />
losses <strong>in</strong> gra<strong>in</strong> fill<strong>in</strong>g and quality. It further spreads to the gra<strong>in</strong><br />
surface, causes discolorations, and affects the fill<strong>in</strong>g of the<br />
spikelets. Host resistance is controlled by both major genes<br />
and quantitative trait loci (QTLs) (Wang et al 1994, Mago et<br />
al 1999). The resistance is attributed to m<strong>in</strong>or genes or QTLs,<br />
and two major genes and 10 QTLs for blast resistance were<br />
identified <strong>in</strong> Moroberekan (Wang et al 1994). QTLs for blast<br />
resistance have been reported by several workers, whereas reports<br />
on NB resistance have been very few.<br />
Our study aimed to conduct genetic analysis and identify<br />
markers associated with major genes and QTLs for field<br />
resistance to NB.<br />
Materials and methods<br />
One hundred and twenty-five doubled-haploid (DH) populations<br />
developed from a cross between IR64 and Azucena<br />
(Guiderdoni et al 1992) were used. <strong>Rice</strong> varieties CO 39, HR12,<br />
and IR50 were used as susceptible checks. These were planted<br />
<strong>in</strong> two replications with 20 plants <strong>in</strong> each replication <strong>in</strong> a randomized<br />
complete block and observations were recorded on<br />
all the plants.<br />
The selected plants were evaluated dur<strong>in</strong>g the 1997 wet<br />
season. The plants were transplanted <strong>in</strong> late kharif at the <strong>Rice</strong><br />
Research Station, RRS Mandya. The plants were exposed to<br />
natural disease <strong>in</strong>cidence, which was quite satisfactory, as seen<br />
<strong>in</strong> the susceptible checks (data not shown). The plants were<br />
scored at 4 wk after head<strong>in</strong>g follow<strong>in</strong>g the standard evaluation<br />
scale and converted <strong>in</strong>to percentage.<br />
Neck blast was scored as the percentage of the number<br />
of <strong>in</strong>fected panicles (necks) to the total number of tillers <strong>in</strong> the<br />
ma<strong>in</strong> field. Neck blast <strong>in</strong>fection was scored on 20 plants per<br />
genotype before harvest and expressed <strong>in</strong> percentage.<br />
Mapp<strong>in</strong>g of major genes was carried out us<strong>in</strong>g Mapmaker<br />
EXP (LOD 4.0), whereas QTLs for NB were identified by <strong>in</strong>terval<br />
analysis us<strong>in</strong>g MAPMAKER QTL as well as a QTL<br />
mapper with a threshold LOD ≥2.0. The progenies scored <strong>in</strong><br />
natural <strong>in</strong>cidence were grouped as resistant and susceptible<br />
for major gene mapp<strong>in</strong>g. B<strong>in</strong>ary observations were made for<br />
major gene mapp<strong>in</strong>g us<strong>in</strong>g Mapmaker EXP. The QTLs were<br />
identified and mapped by elim<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g the completely resistant<br />
and susceptible l<strong>in</strong>es. The nomenclature for QTLs was adopted<br />
follow<strong>in</strong>g the procedures of McCouch et al (1997).<br />
Results and discussion<br />
Mapp<strong>in</strong>g of a major gene and QTL for NB resistance<br />
L<strong>in</strong>kage analysis us<strong>in</strong>g MAPMAKER revealed a major gene<br />
for field resistance to NB, NBL-1(t) on chromosome 11 (Table<br />
1). The position of the major gene is shown <strong>in</strong> Figure 1.<br />
Among parents, there were significant differences <strong>in</strong> NB<br />
<strong>in</strong>fection and also <strong>in</strong> transgressive segregation among the progenies.<br />
IR64 was found to be resistant to NB (
Table 1. Identification of major genes and QTLs for field resistance to neck blast (NB) <strong>in</strong> rice.<br />
Major gene for NB resistance.<br />
Chromosome Gene Markers Distance (cM)<br />
11 NBL-1(t) Npb44 11.4<br />
RG247 19.3<br />
RG167 19.5<br />
QTL ma<strong>in</strong> effect.<br />
Chromosome QTL Marker <strong>in</strong>terval LOD R 2 (%) Resistance<br />
allele<br />
10 qNB-10 C1195-R2174 4.11 24.1 IR64 QTL mapper<br />
5 qNBL-5 RZ649-RZ225 2.42 11.1 MAPMAKER QTL<br />
9 qNBL-9 Amy3ABC-RG667 2.03 8.5 MAPMAKER QTL<br />
Epistatic effect.<br />
Chromosome Interval I Chromosome Interval j LOD R 2 ij a<br />
3 RG348-RZ329 7 Est9-RZ337B 3.89 13.8 0.5188**<br />
3 RZ519-RZ448 9 G103-RZ206 5.31 13.8 0.5186**<br />
4 RG143-RG620 11 RG103-RZ536 4.76 17.3 0.5815**<br />
a ij = epistatic effect between i and j QTL. ** = significant at P = 0.01.<br />
RG566<br />
RZ390<br />
RG313<br />
RZ556<br />
RG403<br />
RG229<br />
RG13<br />
CDO105<br />
RZ649<br />
RZ67<br />
RZ70<br />
RZ225<br />
Chromosome<br />
5 9<br />
RG757<br />
CDO590<br />
C711<br />
G103<br />
RZ206<br />
RZ422<br />
Amy3ABC<br />
RZ228<br />
RZ12<br />
RG667<br />
RG451<br />
RZ792<br />
RZ404<br />
CDO127<br />
RZ638<br />
RZ400<br />
RG118<br />
Adh-1<br />
RG1094<br />
RG167<br />
Npb44<br />
RG247<br />
RG103<br />
RG1109<br />
RZ536<br />
Npb186<br />
Fig.1. Location of major gene NBL-1(t) on chromosome 11 and<br />
QTL for NB resistance on chromosomes 5 and 9 of rice.<br />
11<br />
11.4 cM<br />
NBL-1(t)<br />
19.5 cM<br />
(chromosome 11), <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g that the loci for resistance major<br />
and m<strong>in</strong>or genes are <strong>in</strong>dependent. The QTL on chromosome 5<br />
(qNBL-5) bracket<strong>in</strong>g the RZ649-RZ225 marker <strong>in</strong>terval had<br />
an LOD of 2.4 and 11.1% phenotypic variation, while the QTL<br />
on chromosome 9 (qNBL-9) at the Amy3ABC-RG667 marker<br />
<strong>in</strong>terval had an LOD of 2.03 and 8.5% phenotypic variation.<br />
Although several loci have been reported to confer leaf blast<br />
resistance, very few loci are identified for NB resistance. This<br />
could also be attributed to the lower number of races that may<br />
attack the adult plant, as it is a well-known fact that, as plants<br />
grow older, they develop adult plant resistance and few races<br />
may still be effective. The genetic nature of Pyricularia dur<strong>in</strong>g<br />
the reproductive stage shows that both major genes and<br />
QTLs control the disease and they could be different.<br />
Epistatic <strong>in</strong>teraction of QTLs<br />
Three digenic epistatic effects of the QTLs us<strong>in</strong>g QTL mapper<br />
(V1.1) (Wang et al 1994) were identified. The ma<strong>in</strong>-effect<br />
QTLs identified by both mappers did not <strong>in</strong>teract. The <strong>in</strong>teraction<br />
for these loci was not significant. Although three digenic<br />
epistatic QTLs with maximum variation of R 2 (24.08%) were<br />
on different chromosomes, the epistatic QTL <strong>in</strong>teraction was<br />
for the regions on chromosomes 7, 9, and 11, with total epistasis<br />
of 44.91%. The estimates of significant effects were positive<br />
for two <strong>in</strong>teractions (Table 1), <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g that these <strong>in</strong>teractions<br />
lead to higher resistance. As the ma<strong>in</strong>-effect QTLs were<br />
significant and their <strong>in</strong>teraction nonsignificant, it can be hypothesized<br />
that resistance could be controlled by genetic ma<strong>in</strong><br />
effects without a significant environmental effect and QTL<br />
<strong>in</strong>teraction. The study <strong>in</strong>dicates that NB resistance is controlled<br />
by both major and m<strong>in</strong>or genes, and the epistatic effect of the<br />
ma<strong>in</strong> QTL is at a m<strong>in</strong>imum.<br />
Molecular markers, QTL mapp<strong>in</strong>g, and marker-assisted selection 249
References<br />
Guiderdoni E, Gall<strong>in</strong>ato E, Luistro J, Vergara G. 1992. Anther culture<br />
of tropical japonica/<strong>in</strong>dica hybrids of rice (Oryza sativa<br />
L.). Euphytica 62:219-224.<br />
Imbe T, Tsunematsu H, Kato H, Khush GS. 1998. Genetic analysis<br />
of blast resistance <strong>in</strong> IR varieties. In: Paper presented at the<br />
Second <strong>International</strong> <strong>Rice</strong> Blast Conference, 4-7 Aug 1998,<br />
Montpellier, France. p 11.<br />
Mago R, Nair S, Mohan M. 1999. Resistance gene analogues from<br />
rice: clon<strong>in</strong>g, sequenc<strong>in</strong>g and mapp<strong>in</strong>g. Theor. Appl. Genet.<br />
99:50-57.<br />
McCouch SR, Cho YG, Yano M, Paul E, Bl<strong>in</strong>strub M, Morishima<br />
H, K<strong>in</strong>oshita T. 1997. Report on QTL nomenclature. <strong>Rice</strong><br />
Genet. Newsl. 14:11-13.<br />
Wang GL, Mackill DJ, Bonman M, McCouch SR, Champoux MC,<br />
Nelson RJ. 1994. RFLP mapp<strong>in</strong>g of genes conferr<strong>in</strong>g complete<br />
and partial resistance to blast <strong>in</strong> a durably resistant rice<br />
cultivar. <strong>Genetics</strong> 136:1421-1434.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ address: Department of <strong>Genetics</strong> and Plant Breed<strong>in</strong>g, University<br />
of Agricultural Sciences, Bangalore 560 065, India.<br />
Mapp<strong>in</strong>g QTLs for partial resistance to blast <strong>in</strong> rice<br />
M.Z.I. Talukder, C. Leifert, and A.H. Price<br />
A population of 100 F 6<br />
recomb<strong>in</strong>ant <strong>in</strong>bred l<strong>in</strong>es (RILs) produced by s<strong>in</strong>gle-seed descent from a cross between Azucena<br />
(japonica) and Bala (<strong>in</strong>dica) was evaluated for partial resistance to blast <strong>in</strong> the greenhouse. A genetic map developed from this<br />
population conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g 135 markers on 17 l<strong>in</strong>kage groups cover<strong>in</strong>g 1,680 cM was used to map the QTLs with composite <strong>in</strong>terval<br />
mapp<strong>in</strong>g. Five QTLs were identified for disease severity us<strong>in</strong>g the 3 LOD threshold—one each on chromosomes 1, 10, and 12<br />
and two on chromosome 4. Altogether, these five QTLs accounted for 58% of the phenotypic variation <strong>in</strong> the population. Two<br />
loci, one each on chromosomes 1 and 4, were detected for number of lesions per leaf and together they accounted for 17%<br />
of the phenotypic variation. All of these QTLs reflected a positive effect from the Azucena allele. A total of five, two, and four<br />
QTLs were detected for lesion length, lesion width, and lesion area, respectively, with a large-effect QTL on chromosome 12.<br />
<strong>Rice</strong> blast is considered to be the most important disease of<br />
rice. The <strong>in</strong>sufficient durability of resistance to it is a major<br />
problem <strong>in</strong> breed<strong>in</strong>g blast-resistant varieties, especially <strong>in</strong> upland<br />
rice (Bonman et al 1992). Dynamic changes <strong>in</strong> pathogen<br />
composition have often resulted <strong>in</strong> the breakdown of resistance<br />
<strong>in</strong> improved varieties and have been most strik<strong>in</strong>g when<br />
resistance is conferred by major genes (Kiyosawa 1982). Durable<br />
resistance is often associated with partial resistance conferred<br />
by m<strong>in</strong>or genes with cumulative effects. Recent advances<br />
<strong>in</strong> DNA marker technology make it possible to identify quantitative<br />
trait loci (QTLs) controll<strong>in</strong>g important agronomic traits.<br />
In this study, RFLP and AFLP markers were used to map QTLs<br />
for partial resistance to blast.<br />
Materials and methods<br />
The isolate CD100 of Magnaporthe grisea from Côte d’Ivoire<br />
has been identified as potentially valuable for mapp<strong>in</strong>g partial<br />
resistance by Diddier Tharreau (CIRAD, Montpellier, France).<br />
Four-week-old rice plants were <strong>in</strong>oculated with spores of this<br />
isolate at a concentration of 1 × 10 5 spores mL –1 . The <strong>in</strong>oculum<br />
was prepared follow<strong>in</strong>g standard procedures. Inoculated<br />
plants were <strong>in</strong>cubated at above 90% relative humidity and 28<br />
± 2 day/22 ± 2 °C night temperatures.<br />
Six days after <strong>in</strong>oculation, each plant of the recomb<strong>in</strong>ant<br />
<strong>in</strong>bred l<strong>in</strong>es (RILs) was assessed <strong>in</strong>dividually for blast<br />
<strong>in</strong>fection. Disease severity (DS) was measured follow<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
Standard evaluation system for rice developed by <strong>IRRI</strong> (1996).<br />
Number of lesions per leaf (LPL), lesion length (LL), lesion<br />
width (LW), and lesion area (LA) were measured on the fourth<br />
leaf of the <strong>in</strong>oculated plants.<br />
A RIL population derived from a cross between japonica<br />
variety Azucena and <strong>in</strong>dica variety Bala (see Price et al 2000)<br />
was used to map QTLs for partial blast resistance.<br />
One hundred RILs were grown <strong>in</strong> the greenhouse on 10<br />
trays. In each tray, seven replicate seeds of 10 RILs along with<br />
both parents were sown. The RIL population was screened<br />
with the blast fungus twice—on 13 and 31 March 2000. The<br />
mean of each set of screen<strong>in</strong>g was used <strong>in</strong> the data analysis.<br />
A genetic map developed from this population by Price<br />
et al (2000) conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g 101 RFLP and 34 AFLP markers on 17<br />
l<strong>in</strong>kage groups cover<strong>in</strong>g 1,680 cM was used <strong>in</strong> QTL analysis.<br />
The computer program QTL Cartographer (Basten CJ, Weir<br />
BS, and Zeng ZB, Department of Statistics, North Carol<strong>in</strong>a<br />
State University) was used to estimate QTLs. Position<strong>in</strong>g of<br />
the QTLs was estimated follow<strong>in</strong>g composite <strong>in</strong>terval mapp<strong>in</strong>g<br />
with the default sett<strong>in</strong>gs for model 6. In the analysis, an<br />
LOD score of 3.0 was used to determ<strong>in</strong>e the presence of a<br />
QTL. The percentage of variation expla<strong>in</strong>ed by a QTL was<br />
calculated approximately by l<strong>in</strong>ear regression of the most significant<br />
marker us<strong>in</strong>g the LRmapqtl program of QTL Cartographer.<br />
Results and discussion<br />
The phenotypic distribution of the traits was cont<strong>in</strong>uous, suggest<strong>in</strong>g<br />
quantitative <strong>in</strong>heritance of the characters studied (Fig.<br />
1). In general, the traits followed a normal distribution, with<br />
250 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
No. of RILs<br />
20<br />
15<br />
10<br />
5<br />
25<br />
20<br />
15<br />
10<br />
5<br />
0<br />
20<br />
15<br />
10<br />
5<br />
0<br />
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7<br />
Disease severity<br />
0 10 20 30 40 50 60<br />
Lesions leaf –1 (no.)<br />
0<br />
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0<br />
Lesion length (mm)<br />
20<br />
15<br />
20<br />
15<br />
Mean of Azucena<br />
Mean of Bala<br />
10<br />
10<br />
5<br />
5<br />
0<br />
0<br />
0.0 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6 2.0<br />
0 2 4 6 8 10<br />
Lesion width (mm)<br />
Lesion area (mm 2 )<br />
Fig. 1. Histograms show<strong>in</strong>g the distribution of disease severity, number of lesions per leaf, lesion length (mm),<br />
lesion width (mm), and lesion area measured <strong>in</strong> recomb<strong>in</strong>ant <strong>in</strong>bred l<strong>in</strong>es (RILs) of rice.<br />
the exception of LPL and LW. The skewed distribution of these<br />
traits was due to the presence of a large number of small and<br />
narrow lesions observed on a few RILs. The data of these traits<br />
were transformed before QTL analysis. Transgressive segregation<br />
was observed for all the traits studied.<br />
Five QTLs for DS were identified, one each on chromosomes<br />
1, 10, and 12, expla<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g 4.8%, 13.8%, and 18.9% of<br />
the phenotypic variation, respectively, and two on chromosome<br />
4 expla<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g 12.6% and 8.4% of the variation. The Azucena<br />
alleles reduced DS <strong>in</strong> all these QTLs. Two QTLs for LPL, one<br />
each on chromosomes 1 and 4 that co<strong>in</strong>cided with the genomic<br />
region, which controlled DS, accounted for 5.0% and 12.4%,<br />
respectively, of the phenotypic variation. The Azucena alleles<br />
reduced the number of lesions.<br />
A total of five QTLs were detected for LL, one on chromosome<br />
11 and two each on chromosomes 6 and 12, with positive<br />
effects from both parents. S<strong>in</strong>gle-marker regression analysis<br />
revealed either nonsignificant or small (
1 2<br />
RG532<br />
RG509<br />
RG173<br />
RG83<br />
RZ995<br />
e18m43.7<br />
e18m43.6<br />
e12m45.4<br />
C178<br />
e18m43.5<br />
R2635<br />
54 cM<br />
C1370<br />
G393<br />
R2417<br />
51 cM<br />
RG171<br />
G45<br />
e18m43.8<br />
G39/RG139<br />
G57<br />
C601<br />
RG256<br />
3<br />
e12m37.4<br />
C643<br />
RG409<br />
RG191<br />
e12m45.1<br />
RG745<br />
e12m36.10<br />
G144<br />
e12m36.16<br />
RZ474<br />
C136<br />
R1618<br />
Chromosome<br />
4<br />
RG620<br />
5<br />
4.6 C734<br />
RG449<br />
RZ390<br />
R3166<br />
7.1<br />
e18m43.17<br />
RG190<br />
R2232<br />
R569<br />
4.9 RG13<br />
C513<br />
RG163<br />
C624<br />
C43<br />
RZ70<br />
54 cM<br />
RG119<br />
RG346<br />
4.3<br />
4.1<br />
6<br />
C76<br />
RZ516<br />
e12m36.1<br />
RG213<br />
51 cM<br />
e12m36.18<br />
R2654<br />
e12m37.7<br />
e12m37.6<br />
RG778<br />
RZ682<br />
3.5 4.6<br />
4.0<br />
5.9<br />
C86<br />
C949<br />
RZ14<br />
R117<br />
Disease severity<br />
Number of lesions per leaf<br />
Lesion length<br />
Lesion width<br />
G164<br />
Lesion area<br />
100 cM<br />
7<br />
G338<br />
C39<br />
G89b<br />
R1440<br />
G20<br />
C451<br />
RG650<br />
C507<br />
e12m37.14<br />
e12m36.1<br />
RG351<br />
8<br />
R902<br />
e12m36.7<br />
G1010<br />
C225<br />
e12m37.10<br />
e18m43.4<br />
G2132<br />
G1073<br />
G187<br />
R2676<br />
R202<br />
RG598<br />
R662<br />
9<br />
R1164<br />
e12m36x<br />
R1687<br />
R79<br />
G385<br />
e18m43.26<br />
e12m36.13<br />
G1085<br />
e18m43.25<br />
e12m36.4<br />
C506<br />
3.2<br />
10<br />
C701<br />
G89d<br />
RG257<br />
e12m37.2<br />
G1082<br />
C16<br />
C223<br />
3.5<br />
11<br />
R642<br />
RZ141<br />
e18m43z<br />
e12m36.2<br />
G320<br />
e15m35.14<br />
G44<br />
e12m45y<br />
e12m36.15<br />
RG2<br />
C189<br />
e12m36.6<br />
G1465<br />
e12m37.12<br />
10.2<br />
15.9<br />
12.7<br />
3.7<br />
12<br />
G24<br />
CDO127<br />
e12m37.13<br />
G124<br />
48 cM<br />
R617<br />
RG341<br />
e12m36.14<br />
R1933<br />
C449<br />
RG543<br />
RG181/C901<br />
3.0 3.7 3.8<br />
Fig. 2. QTLs for characters related to partial blast resistance <strong>in</strong> rice. Boxes represent the one-LOD confidence <strong>in</strong>terval and the values next to the boxes represent the<br />
correspond<strong>in</strong>g LOD score of the QTL. Boxes to the left of each chromosome identify QTLs where Azucena alleles have a positive effect, whereas boxes to the right<br />
identify QTLs where Bala alleles have a positive effect.<br />
252 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
Marker-assisted selection for transferr<strong>in</strong>g resistance<br />
to blast <strong>in</strong> high-yield<strong>in</strong>g but susceptible Jyothi<br />
L. Babujee, B. Venkatesan, S. Kavitha, S.S. Gnanamanickam, S. Leenakumari, S. McCouch, and S. Leong<br />
We have <strong>in</strong>trogressed the blast resistance genes Pi1 and Pi2 from a CO39 pyramid through backcross<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to rice cv. Jyothi, a<br />
high-yield<strong>in</strong>g but blast- and bacterial blight (BB)-susceptible cultivar. The pyramided rice l<strong>in</strong>es carry<strong>in</strong>g Pi1 and Pi2 excluded<br />
the entire rice blast population <strong>in</strong> Kerala State, southern India, when they were evaluated at Pattambi, Kerala, a hot spot for<br />
blast. Phenotypic evaluation for select<strong>in</strong>g resistant progenies was supported by selection us<strong>in</strong>g molecular markers (microsatellite<br />
markers RM224 and RM144 with<strong>in</strong> 2.4 cM from Pi1 on chromosome 11). Progress has also been made to improve cv. Jyothi<br />
and IR50 for resistance to BB. The pyramided l<strong>in</strong>e NH56 carry<strong>in</strong>g Xa4, xa5, xa13, and Xa21 was used as the resistant donor<br />
<strong>in</strong> backcross breed<strong>in</strong>g. The RFLP marker G181 situated at 1.7 cM from Xa4 on chromosome 11 and PCR-based markers<br />
(RG556 for xa5 with<strong>in</strong> 0–1 cM on chromosome 5, RG136 for xa13 with<strong>in</strong> 3.8 cM on chromosome 8, and pTA248 for Xa21 at<br />
0–1 cM on chromosome 11) have been deployed to select l<strong>in</strong>es carry<strong>in</strong>g all four BB resistance genes.<br />
Two important diseases that account for major yield losses <strong>in</strong><br />
most rice-grow<strong>in</strong>g areas worldwide are blast and bacterial blight<br />
(BB). The use of host resistance is the most economical and<br />
environment-friendly strategy to avert the spread of epidemics.<br />
In the southern Indian state of Kerala, high-yield<strong>in</strong>g cv.<br />
Jyothi is cultivated <strong>in</strong> large areas, but it is highly susceptible to<br />
both blast and bacterial blight. We also studied the genetic<br />
structure and virulence characteristics of the rice blast fungus<br />
<strong>in</strong> southern India and <strong>in</strong> Kerala (Sivaraj et al 2000). In l<strong>in</strong>eage-exclusion<br />
assays, none of the 25 pathogen l<strong>in</strong>eages prevalent<br />
<strong>in</strong> southern India, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g Kerala, was able to overcome<br />
the blast resistance afforded by Pi2(t) or Pi1 + Pi2(t) genes.<br />
This study describes the transfer of these blast resistance genes<br />
<strong>in</strong>to rice cv. Jyothi through marker-assisted selection.<br />
Materials and methods<br />
A CO39 pyramid (carry<strong>in</strong>g the dom<strong>in</strong>ant genes Pi1 and Pi2<br />
for blast resistance) was crossed to elite commercial cultivar<br />
Jyothi to obta<strong>in</strong> F 1 plants. The F 1 plants were further backcrossed<br />
to obta<strong>in</strong> BC 1 plants or were selfed to obta<strong>in</strong> F 2 progeny.<br />
Genomic DNA was extracted from F 2 plants, BC 1 plants,<br />
and the parental l<strong>in</strong>es follow<strong>in</strong>g the modified method of Tai<br />
and Tanksley (1990). The quality and quantity of the DNA<br />
were determ<strong>in</strong>ed electrophoretically. Primers for microsatellite<br />
sequences RM144, RM224, RM139, and RM254 were obta<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
from Dr. Susan McCouch’s laboratory at Cornell University.<br />
Table 1 provides <strong>in</strong>formation on the nucleotide sequences<br />
and length of these primer sources (http://ars-genome.<br />
cornell. edu/rice/microsats.html).<br />
Genomic DNA of the resistant donor parent and the<br />
susceptible parent underwent PCR amplification <strong>in</strong> an MJ<br />
thermocycler us<strong>in</strong>g the primer pairs. The PCR mixture consisted<br />
of 10 ng of template DNA, 10 µM each of the primers,<br />
0.1 mM dNTPs, 1X PCR buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.3),<br />
50 mM KCl, 1.5 mM MgCl 2 , 0.01% gelat<strong>in</strong>), and 0.25 units of<br />
Taq polymerase <strong>in</strong> a f<strong>in</strong>al volume of 25 µL. Template DNA<br />
was <strong>in</strong>itially denatured for 5 m<strong>in</strong> at 94 °C, followed by 30<br />
cycles of amplification under the follow<strong>in</strong>g conditions: 15 sec<br />
of denaturation at 94 °C, 15 sec of primer anneal<strong>in</strong>g at 55 °C,<br />
and 15 sec of primer extension at 72 °C. A f<strong>in</strong>al 5-m<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>cubation<br />
was allowed at 72 °C for completion of primer extension.<br />
The amplified DNA was mixed with 3X STR buffer (0.2% v/<br />
v 5M NaOH, 95% v/v formamide, 0.05% w/v bromophenol<br />
blue, 0.05% w/v xylene cyanol FF) to a f<strong>in</strong>al concentration of<br />
1X and denatured by heat<strong>in</strong>g at 85 °C for 5 m<strong>in</strong> and rapidly<br />
chill<strong>in</strong>g at –20 °C. The denatured samples were electrophoresed<br />
on an alum<strong>in</strong>um-backed sequenc<strong>in</strong>g system (Model #<br />
S3S from Owl Scientific Inc., MA, USA). Preparation of the<br />
gel, assembly of the electrophoresis apparatus, and load<strong>in</strong>g<br />
and runn<strong>in</strong>g of samples were accord<strong>in</strong>g to procedures described<br />
previously (Doyle 1996). Silver sta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g and photograph<strong>in</strong>g<br />
procedures described <strong>in</strong> the Promega protocols and application<br />
guide (Doyle 1996) were followed.<br />
Magnaporthe grisea stra<strong>in</strong> IN173.1.1 (MGR-RFLP l<strong>in</strong>eage<br />
“R”) that showed a differential reaction toward the two<br />
parents (virulent on susceptible parent Jyothi and avirulent on<br />
CO39, which carries Pi1) was used to differentiate resistant<br />
(presumably because of the presence of Pi1) and susceptible<br />
plants <strong>in</strong> F 2 and BC 1 populations. Phenotypic analyses were<br />
carried out at the Regional Agricultural Research Station,<br />
Pattambi, Kerala, <strong>in</strong> southern India. Methods for <strong>in</strong>oculum<br />
preparation and <strong>in</strong>oculation were as described previously<br />
(Mackill and Bonman 1992). For <strong>in</strong>oculation, a conidial suspension<br />
of 100,000 conidia mL –1 <strong>in</strong> 0.5% gelat<strong>in</strong> was used.<br />
Inoculated plants were kept <strong>in</strong> an enclosure devised with gunny<br />
bags supported by PVC pipes. The bags were kept moist to<br />
ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> high humidity (>90%) for the development of blast<br />
symptoms. Disease reaction was scored 1 wk after <strong>in</strong>oculation<br />
on a 0 to 9 scale described <strong>in</strong> the Standard evaluation system<br />
for rice (IRTP 1988).<br />
Molecular markers, QTL mapp<strong>in</strong>g, and marker-assisted selection 253
Table 1. Sequence of primers used for PCR amplification of microsatellite<br />
loci.<br />
Microsatellite locus/<br />
primer<br />
RM144 (OSM48)<br />
RM224 (CT199)<br />
Results<br />
Electrophoretic analysis of PCR products derived from the<br />
CO39 pyramid (Pi1 and Pi2) and Jyothi revealed no polymorphism<br />
with RM254 and RM139. Allelic diversity was evident<br />
at the microsatellite loci RM144 and RM224. A 210-bp band<br />
corresponded to an allele from the susceptible parent, whereas<br />
a 250-bp band corresponded to an allele from the resistant<br />
parent for the microsatellite locus RM144. For the locus<br />
RM224, a 140-bp band represented the allele from the susceptible<br />
parent and a 90-bp band corresponded to the allele<br />
from the resistant parent.<br />
To exam<strong>in</strong>e the validity of the microsatellite loci as genetic<br />
markers, genomic DNA from 150 F 2 <strong>in</strong>dividuals and 80<br />
BC 1 <strong>in</strong>dividuals was PCR amplified us<strong>in</strong>g the primers CT199<br />
(for microsatellite locus RM224) and OSM48 (for<br />
microsatellite locus RM144). The resultant PCR products were<br />
resolved on 4% acrylamide gel after denaturation. The band<strong>in</strong>g<br />
patterns were scored with reference to those of the parents.<br />
The band<strong>in</strong>g patterns of the F 2 <strong>in</strong>dividuals could be classified<br />
as homozygous for the resistant-type marker (250-bp<br />
band for RM144/90-bp band for RM224), homozygous for<br />
the Jyothi-type marker (210-bp band for RM144/140-bp band<br />
for RM224), or heterozygous (display<strong>in</strong>g both bands with either<br />
marker). Resistant plants (heterozygotes) could similarly<br />
be dist<strong>in</strong>guished from the susceptible ones (homozygous for<br />
the Jyothi-type marker) <strong>in</strong> the BC 1 population.<br />
Chi-square analysis of goodness of fit was done for the<br />
segregat<strong>in</strong>g populations (data not shown). Expected Mendelian<br />
ratios of 1:1 and 1:2:1, respectively, were not obta<strong>in</strong>ed for<br />
BC 1 and F 2 populations, suggest<strong>in</strong>g a segregation distortion at<br />
these loci.<br />
Discussion<br />
Primer sequence<br />
F TGC CCT GGC GCA AAT TTG ATC C<br />
R GCT AGA GGA GAT CAG ATG GTA GTG CAT G<br />
F ATC GAT CGA TCT TCA CGA GG<br />
R TGC TAT AAA AGG CAT TCG GG<br />
Marker genotypes were used <strong>in</strong> this study to predict the presence<br />
of the Pi1 gene <strong>in</strong> F 2 <strong>in</strong>dividuals. The F 2 <strong>in</strong>dividuals that<br />
showed either band were predicted to be homozygous for the<br />
correspond<strong>in</strong>g allele, whereas plants that showed both bands<br />
were predicted to be heterozygous at the Pi1 locus. This prediction<br />
was compared with data derived from plant <strong>in</strong>oculation<br />
assays of F 3 families. Table 2 shows the comparative results.<br />
L<strong>in</strong>eage-exclusion tests have repeatedly identified the<br />
Pi1 gene to be useful when deployed <strong>in</strong> comb<strong>in</strong>ation with Pi2,<br />
Table 2. Comparison of Pi1 genotype of F 2 plants based on SSLP<br />
analysis of microsatellite loci (RM144 and RM224) and F 3 progeny<br />
test<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
Number of plants<br />
Match<br />
Genotype (%)<br />
SSLP analysis F 3 progeny test<br />
RM144<br />
RR 17 16 94.1<br />
Rr 28 27 96.4<br />
rr 105 105 100.0<br />
RM224<br />
RR 18 18 100.0<br />
Rr 30 28 93.3<br />
rr 102 102 100.0<br />
another major blast resistance gene located on chromosome 6<br />
to combat rice blast <strong>in</strong> southern India (Babujee and<br />
Gnanamanickam 2000). To breed varieties with durable resistance<br />
to blast, we are currently pyramid<strong>in</strong>g the genes Pi1 and<br />
Pi2 <strong>in</strong>to high-yield<strong>in</strong>g but blast-prone local cultivars by conventional<br />
backcross breed<strong>in</strong>g (Babujee and Gnanamanickam<br />
2000). In this study, we have shown that microsatellite loci<br />
can be used as genetic markers to identify plants carry<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
Pi1 gene for blast resistance <strong>in</strong> segregat<strong>in</strong>g populations. Because<br />
l<strong>in</strong>ked RFLP and STS markers were not found, perhaps<br />
because of the closely related genetic backgrounds of the parental<br />
varieties, SSLP analysis was used to identify polymorphic<br />
markers. Polymorphism associated with microsatellite loci<br />
has been shown to be extremely useful <strong>in</strong> dist<strong>in</strong>guish<strong>in</strong>g closely<br />
related rice varieties (Panaud et al 1995).<br />
The microsatellite markers used <strong>in</strong> this study could dist<strong>in</strong>guish<br />
between homozygous/heterozygous resistant and susceptible<br />
plants <strong>in</strong> F 2 and BC 1 populations. F 3 progeny-test<strong>in</strong>g<br />
results revealed a very high percentage of accuracy (Table 2),<br />
<strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g tight l<strong>in</strong>kage of the markers to Pi1. Earlier, these<br />
microsatellite DNA markers had been mapped with<strong>in</strong> a distance<br />
of 13.4 ± 1.4 cM from Pi1 on chromosome 11 (Susan<br />
McCouch, personal communication). Chi-square analysis for<br />
goodness of fit for F 2 and F 3 populations (data not shown)<br />
<strong>in</strong>dicated that segregation at the Pi1 locus did not conform to<br />
typical Mendelian ratios. Distortion of segregation is not<br />
uncommon <strong>in</strong> rice and the phenomenon has been recently reported<br />
for other markers located very close to this region on<br />
chromosome 11 (and at several regions on all 12 rice chromosomes)<br />
(Xu et al 1997). The reasons for such a phenomenon,<br />
however, rema<strong>in</strong> unclear.<br />
Polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis was used to resolve<br />
PCR products <strong>in</strong> this study. However, a high-resolution matrix<br />
such as metaphor:agarose (1:3) can serve as an efficient alternative<br />
for use <strong>in</strong> laboratories with limited facilities. The low quantities<br />
of DNA required for SSLP analysis and the rapidity with<br />
which the analyses can be performed make it convenient for<br />
use especially when the population to be screened is fairly large.<br />
254 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
References<br />
Babujee L, Gnanamanickam SS. 2000. Molecular tools for characterization<br />
of rice blast pathogen (Magnaporthe grisea) population<br />
and molecular marker-assisted breed<strong>in</strong>g for disease resistance.<br />
Curr. Sci. 78:248-257.<br />
Doyle K, editor. 1996. Protocols and applications guide. 3rd ed. USA:<br />
Promega Corp.<br />
<strong>International</strong> <strong>Rice</strong> Test<strong>in</strong>g Program (IRTP). 1988. Standard evaluation<br />
system for rice, 3rd ed. Los Baños (Philipp<strong>in</strong>es): <strong>International</strong><br />
<strong>Rice</strong> Research Institute.<br />
Mackill DJ, Bonman JM. 1992. Inheritance of blast resistance <strong>in</strong><br />
near isogenic l<strong>in</strong>es of rice. Phytopathology 82:746-749.<br />
Tai T, Tanksley SD. 1990. A rapid and <strong>in</strong>expensive method for isolation<br />
of total DNA from dehydrated plant tissue. Plant Mol.<br />
Biol. Rep. 8:297-303.<br />
Xu Y, Zhu L, Xiao J, Huang N, McCouch SR. 1997. Chromosomal<br />
regions associated with segregation distortion of molecular<br />
markers <strong>in</strong> F 2 , backcross, double haploid and recomb<strong>in</strong>ant<br />
<strong>in</strong>bred populations <strong>in</strong> rice (Oryza sativa L.). Mol. Gen. Genet.<br />
253:535-545.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ addresses: L. Babujee, B. Venkatesan, S. Kavitha, and S.S.<br />
Gnanamanickam, Centre for Advanced Studies <strong>in</strong> Botany,<br />
University of Madras, Gu<strong>in</strong>dy Campus, Chennai; S.<br />
Leenakumari, Regional Agricultural Research Station,<br />
Patambi, Kerala, India; S. McCouch, Department of Plant<br />
Breed<strong>in</strong>g, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853; and S. Leong,<br />
USDA-ARS, Department of Plant Pathology, University of<br />
Wiscons<strong>in</strong>, Madison, WI 53706, USA.<br />
Acknowledgments: This research was funded by generous grants from<br />
the Rockefeller Foundation under their rice biotechnology<br />
program. The authors wish to thank the director, Centre for<br />
Advanced Studies <strong>in</strong> Botany, University of Madras, for laboratory<br />
facilities. We also thank the associate director, RARS<br />
(Kerala Agricultural University), Pattambi, Kerala, for provid<strong>in</strong>g<br />
field space and assistance with the breed<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
Us<strong>in</strong>g microsatellite markers to select blast resistance<br />
<strong>in</strong> U.S. rice breed<strong>in</strong>g l<strong>in</strong>es<br />
R.G. Fjellstrom, C. Conaway, W.D. Park, M.A. Marchetti, and A.M. McClung<br />
Blast disease, caused by Pyricularia grisea, is one of the most widespread and destructive diseases of rice <strong>in</strong> the world.<br />
Comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g blast-resistance genes can be difficult us<strong>in</strong>g traditional breed<strong>in</strong>g methods s<strong>in</strong>ce the presence of some resistance<br />
genes can mask other resistance genes. We are develop<strong>in</strong>g PCR-based microsatellite markers associated with several major<br />
blast-resistance genes. Microsatellite markers have been evaluated for their genetic l<strong>in</strong>kage with the blast-resistance genes Pib,<br />
Pi-k h , and Pi-ta 2 located on chromosomes 2, 11, and 12, respectively. We have identified three markers associated with the<br />
Pi-b resistance gene derived from the Ch<strong>in</strong>ese variety Teq<strong>in</strong>g and two markers associated with Pi-ta 2 resistance on chromosome<br />
12 from the Vietnamese variety Tetep, and are evaluat<strong>in</strong>g three markers associated with the Pi-k h and Pi-k s resistance<br />
alleles derived from the U.S. varieties Dawn and Caloro, respectively. These markers are be<strong>in</strong>g used to select new varieties that<br />
will have blast-resistance gene comb<strong>in</strong>ations result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> broad-spectrum resistance aga<strong>in</strong>st blast races found <strong>in</strong> the U.S.<br />
<strong>Rice</strong> blast, caused by Pyricularia grisea, is one of the most<br />
widespread and destructive diseases of rice. The blast pathogen<br />
is highly variable, with numerous races of blast present<br />
under most field conditions. Blast-resistant varieties <strong>in</strong> the<br />
United States have been developed from genetic sources that<br />
have both complete and partial resistance factors. Unfortunately,<br />
genes controll<strong>in</strong>g complete resistance to blast confer<br />
resistance to one or more, but not all, races of blast. Ten races<br />
of blast, designated as IB-1, IB-45, IB-49, IB-54, IC-17, ID-<br />
13, IE-1, IE-1K, IG-1, and IH-1, are commonly found <strong>in</strong> the<br />
rice-grow<strong>in</strong>g regions of the U.S. Race-specific Pi-resistance<br />
genes used <strong>in</strong> U.S. breed<strong>in</strong>g programs <strong>in</strong>clude Pi-ta 2 , orig<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g<br />
from the Vietnamese variety Tetep, which confers resistance<br />
to all races of blast <strong>in</strong> the U.S. except IE-1K; Pi-k h , orig<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g<br />
from Dawn, which confers resistance to IB-45, IB-54,<br />
IG-1, and IH-1; Pi-k s (allelic to Pi-k h ), orig<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g from Caloro,<br />
which confers resistance to IB-54; and, more recently, Pi-b,<br />
orig<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g from the Ch<strong>in</strong>ese variety Teq<strong>in</strong>g, which confers<br />
resistance to IC-17, IE-1, IE-1K, and IG-1 (Marchetti et al<br />
1987, Marchetti, unpublished data).<br />
Multiple blast-resistance genes can be comb<strong>in</strong>ed to obta<strong>in</strong><br />
broad-spectrum resistance. DNA markers provide a means<br />
to efficiently pyramid several resistance factors together. DNA<br />
markers associated with genes conferr<strong>in</strong>g both complete and<br />
partial resistance to blast have been located on rice chromosome<br />
maps, as reviewed <strong>in</strong> Hittalmani et al (2000). Comprehensive<br />
microsatellite maps have been developed <strong>in</strong> rice that<br />
have been comb<strong>in</strong>ed with maps of disease-resistance genes<br />
(<strong>Rice</strong>Genes, http://ars-genome.cornell.edu/rice/). In this study,<br />
we report on the development of microsatellites for markerassisted<br />
selection for blast resistance <strong>in</strong> the U.S. Department<br />
of Agriculture-Texas A&M University (USDA/TAMU) varietal<br />
improvement program.<br />
Molecular markers, QTL mapp<strong>in</strong>g, and marker-assisted selection 255
Materials and methods<br />
The crosses and blast races used to evaluate segregation of<br />
<strong>in</strong>dividual Pi- genes <strong>in</strong>cluded Gulfmont × Teq<strong>in</strong>g us<strong>in</strong>g IE-1K<br />
for Pi-b resistance; Jefferson-sibl<strong>in</strong>g × Katy us<strong>in</strong>g IB-54 for<br />
Pi-k h resistance; Maybelle × M-201 and Maybelle × Bengal,<br />
with both us<strong>in</strong>g IB-54 for Pi-k s resistance; and Kaybonnet ×<br />
M-204 us<strong>in</strong>g IB-49 for Pi-ta 2 resistance.<br />
Standard methods were used to prepare <strong>in</strong>dividual races<br />
of the blast fungus for seedl<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>oculation and to evaluate<br />
plants for their disease-resistance reaction 6–8 d after <strong>in</strong>oculation<br />
(Marchetti et al 1987).<br />
DNA was extracted from 20–40 mg lyophilized tissues<br />
of greenhouse-evaluated material. Microsatellite markers were<br />
polymerase cha<strong>in</strong> reaction (PCR)-amplified us<strong>in</strong>g the protocol<br />
of Ayers et al (1997) with primers RM138, RM166, and<br />
RM208 for Pi-b; RM83 and RM101 for Pi-ta 2 ; and RM144<br />
for Pi-k h . Amplification products were loaded on nondenatur<strong>in</strong>g<br />
8% polyacrylamide gels (1XTBE), run overnight at 220V,<br />
sta<strong>in</strong>ed (GelStar, FMC), placed on a blue light-emitt<strong>in</strong>g transillum<strong>in</strong>ator<br />
(DarkReader, Clare Chemical Research), and recorded<br />
with a digital camera. Marker genotypes were determ<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
and compared with disease-resistance reactions to estimate<br />
the l<strong>in</strong>kage between resistance genes and microsatellites,<br />
with genetic distance reported as a recomb<strong>in</strong>ation fraction<br />
(Morgan map units).<br />
Results and discussion<br />
Pi-b resistance factor on chromosome 2<br />
The identification of microsatellite markers <strong>in</strong> the USDA/<br />
TAMU program began before comprehensive microsatellite<br />
maps were developed. Candidate microsatellite sequences<br />
found near Pi-resistance gene regions were <strong>in</strong>itially identified<br />
from the sequence analysis of publicly accessed DNA databases<br />
(e.g., GenBank). RM138 and RM166 were among the<br />
first microsatellites identified to be closely l<strong>in</strong>ked to the Pi-b<br />
gene of Teq<strong>in</strong>g, flank<strong>in</strong>g it at 5.3 and 5.1 cM, respectively<br />
(Table 1). Other microsatellites later mapped between these<br />
markers were subsequently tested and RM208 was found to<br />
cosegregate (0.0 cM l<strong>in</strong>kage, Table 1) with the Pi-b gene. S<strong>in</strong>ce<br />
the Pi-b gene has been cloned (Wang et al 1999), we have<br />
been able to confirm the cosegregation of IE-1K resistance<br />
with a dom<strong>in</strong>ant marker <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g the presence of the Pi-b<br />
gene sequences <strong>in</strong> this cross and <strong>in</strong> other crosses us<strong>in</strong>g Teq<strong>in</strong>g<br />
as a parent. We f<strong>in</strong>d the l<strong>in</strong>ked microsatellite markers to be<br />
more useful than the dom<strong>in</strong>ant Pi-b gene sequence itself because<br />
heterozygotes can be discrim<strong>in</strong>ated from homozygotes<br />
and failed PCR amplification reactions can be more readily<br />
identified.<br />
Pi-k h /Pi-k s resistance factors on chromosome 11<br />
RM144 was found to be 7.8 cM from the Pi-k h gene of the<br />
Jefferson-sibl<strong>in</strong>g parent, which had been derived from the U.S.<br />
variety Dawn (Table 1). We are currently evaluat<strong>in</strong>g RM144,<br />
RM224, and RM254 to determ<strong>in</strong>e their usefulness for tagg<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Table 1. Recomb<strong>in</strong>ation rates between blast-resistance genes and<br />
microsatellite markers tested <strong>in</strong> the USDA/TAMU varietal improvement<br />
program.<br />
Resistance gene Cross comb<strong>in</strong>ation Microsatellite Recomb<strong>in</strong>ation<br />
Pi-b Gulfmont × Teq<strong>in</strong>g a RM138 11/207<br />
RM166 10/198<br />
RM208 0/74<br />
Pi-k h Jefferson-sib a × Katy RM144 17/217<br />
Pi-ta 2 Kaybonnet a × M-204 RM83 6/57<br />
RM101 29/557<br />
a Blast-resistant parent.<br />
the allelic Pi-k h and Pi-k s resistance genes <strong>in</strong> other crosses us<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Bengal and M-201, respectively, as sources of resistance.<br />
Pi-ta 2 resistance factors on chromosome 12<br />
RM83 and RM101 were found to be located 10.5 cM and 5.2<br />
cM, respectively, from the IB-49 resistance factor <strong>in</strong> Kaybonnet<br />
(Table 1). Although the IC-17 and IB-49 resistance factors of<br />
the Pi-ta 2 gene appear to be separate (Chao et al 1999,<br />
Marchetti, unpublished data), we have not yet mapped the distance<br />
between these factors. Because both markers lie on one<br />
side of the Pi-ta 2 gene, we are try<strong>in</strong>g to develop flank<strong>in</strong>g markers<br />
that are associated with the IB-49 and IC-17 resistance<br />
factors and that could be used to detect recomb<strong>in</strong>ation between<br />
these factors.<br />
In conclusion, we have identified microsatellite markers<br />
associated with three blast-resistance genes used <strong>in</strong> U.S. rice<br />
breed<strong>in</strong>g programs. These markers are be<strong>in</strong>g actively used for<br />
marker-assisted selection to <strong>in</strong>trogress multiple blast-resistance<br />
genes <strong>in</strong>to advanced breed<strong>in</strong>g l<strong>in</strong>es.<br />
References<br />
Ayers NM, McClung AM, Lark<strong>in</strong> PD, Bligh HFJ, Jones CA, Park<br />
WD. 1997. Microsatellites and a s<strong>in</strong>gle-nucleotide polymorphism<br />
differentiate apparent amylose classes <strong>in</strong> an extended<br />
pedigree of U.S. rice germplasm. Theor. Appl. Genet. 94:773-<br />
781.<br />
Chao CT, Moldenhauer KAK, Ell<strong>in</strong>gboe AH. 1999. Genetic analysis<br />
of resistance/susceptibility <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividual F 3 families of rice<br />
aga<strong>in</strong>st stra<strong>in</strong>s of Magnaporthe grisea conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g different<br />
genes for avirulence. Euphytica 109:183-190.<br />
Hittalmani S, Parco A, Mew TV, Zeigler RS, Huang N. 2000. F<strong>in</strong>e<br />
mapp<strong>in</strong>g and DNA marker-assisted pyramid<strong>in</strong>g of the three<br />
major genes for blast resistance <strong>in</strong> rice. Theor. Appl. Genet.<br />
100:1121-1128.<br />
Marchetti MA, Lai X, Bollich CN. 1987. Inheritance of resistance<br />
to Pyricularia oryzae <strong>in</strong> rice cultivars grown <strong>in</strong> the United<br />
States. Phytopathology 77:799-804.<br />
Wang Z-X, Yano M, Yamanouchi U, Iwamoto M, Monna L, Hayasaka<br />
H, Katayose Y, Sasaki T. 1999. The Pib gene for disease resistance<br />
belongs to the nucleotide b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g and leuc<strong>in</strong>e-rich<br />
repeat class of plant disease resistance genes. Plant J. 19:55-<br />
66.<br />
256 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
Notes<br />
Authors’ addresses: R.G. Fjellstrom, M.A. Marchetti, A.M.<br />
McClung, United States Department of Agriculture (USDA),<br />
Agricultural Research Service, <strong>Rice</strong> Research Unit, 1509<br />
Aggie Drive, Beaumont, Texas 77713; C. Conaway, W.D. Park,<br />
Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Texas A&M<br />
University (TAMU), College Station, Texas 77843, USA.<br />
Mapp<strong>in</strong>g a recessive gene conferr<strong>in</strong>g resistance<br />
to rice yellow mottle virus<br />
M.N. Ndjiondjop-Nzenkam, L. Albar, D. Fargette, C. Brugidou, M.P. Jones, and A. Ghesquiere<br />
<strong>Rice</strong> yellow mottle virus (RYMV) is a serious disease of rice <strong>in</strong> Africa. Although partial resistance is found <strong>in</strong> upland rice<br />
varieties, all the irrigated and lowland rice varieties commonly grown <strong>in</strong> Africa are highly susceptible to RYMV. A few accessions<br />
of the African cultivated rice species (Oryza glaberrima) and a s<strong>in</strong>gle variety of O. sativa (Gigante) display a very high resistance<br />
level similar to immunity. The genetic basis of resistance to RYMV was determ<strong>in</strong>ed through <strong>in</strong>terspecific and <strong>in</strong>traspecific<br />
crosses us<strong>in</strong>g Tog5681 (O. glaberrima) and Gigante as RYMV resistance donors and IR64 as the susceptible parent. The<br />
resistance was due to the presence of a s<strong>in</strong>gle recessive gene with probably different resistance alleles <strong>in</strong> Tog5681 and<br />
Gigante. Bulked segregant analysis (BSA) was used to map the RYMV resistance gene. About 250 primer comb<strong>in</strong>ations were<br />
used to compare band<strong>in</strong>g patterns between parental l<strong>in</strong>es and bulks of susceptible or resistant (IR64 × Gigante) F 3<br />
l<strong>in</strong>es. In<br />
addition, more than 20 bands com<strong>in</strong>g from one or the other parent were found to be candidates for the resistance com<strong>in</strong>g from<br />
Tog5681. Mapp<strong>in</strong>g on the (IR64 × Gigante) F 2<br />
population revealed an <strong>in</strong>terval of 17 cM spann<strong>in</strong>g the RYMV resistance locus.<br />
One of these markers was cloned and specific primers were designed. A cleaved amplified polymorphic sequence (CAPS) has<br />
been determ<strong>in</strong>ed to characterize the Gigante and IR64 alleles. This marker was mapped on the (IR64 × Azucena) genetic<br />
l<strong>in</strong>kage map and was localized on chromosome 4. PCR-based resistance markers allowed us to beg<strong>in</strong> transferr<strong>in</strong>g the RYMV<br />
resistance gene <strong>in</strong>to Bouake 189, BG90-2, and Jaya (O. sativa) varieties, which are very well adapted to African lowland<br />
conditions but are highly susceptible to RYMV. F<strong>in</strong>e mapp<strong>in</strong>g of the RYMV resistance locus and the construction of IR64 isol<strong>in</strong>es<br />
with the two resistance genes are <strong>in</strong> progress.<br />
<strong>Rice</strong> yellow mottle sobemovirus (RYMV) is a major disease<br />
affect<strong>in</strong>g rice production <strong>in</strong> Africa and Madagascar. The <strong>in</strong>tensification<br />
of farm<strong>in</strong>g systems (irrigation and <strong>in</strong>troduction<br />
of high-yield<strong>in</strong>g varieties) has led to RYMV epidemic outbreaks.<br />
All varieties usually grown <strong>in</strong> irrigated conditions and<br />
<strong>in</strong> lowland areas of Africa are susceptible to RYMV. In nature,<br />
RYMV is transmitted by chrysomelid beetles. Symptoms consist<br />
of yellow mottl<strong>in</strong>g on the leaves, reduced tiller<strong>in</strong>g, stunted<br />
plants, and sterile flowers, and susceptible cultivars die. The<br />
RYMV genome is a positive s<strong>in</strong>gle-stranded RNA of 4,450<br />
nucleotides. To replicate, RYMV uses a subgenomic RNA strategy<br />
and its replication occurs <strong>in</strong> all parts of the rice plant, but<br />
ma<strong>in</strong>ly <strong>in</strong> the mesophyll and xylem parenchyma. Different<br />
degrees of resistance to RYMV have been detected <strong>in</strong> the cultivated<br />
Asian (Oryza sativa) and African rice varieties (O.<br />
glaberrima).<br />
Partial resistance <strong>in</strong> ra<strong>in</strong>fed rice O. sativa subsp. japonica<br />
from Africa (Lac-23 and Moroberekan) and Asia (Azucena) is<br />
under polygenic control. One major quantitative trait locus<br />
(QTL) has been found on chromosome 12, which <strong>in</strong>teracts with<br />
other regions of the rice genome. A high level of resistance<br />
needed for susta<strong>in</strong>able breed<strong>in</strong>g has been found <strong>in</strong> some O.<br />
glaberrima varieties and Gigante (O. sativa). We studied the<br />
genetics of resistance to RYMV and mapp<strong>in</strong>g of genes l<strong>in</strong>ked<br />
to RYMV.<br />
Results suggested that there was no limitation to virus<br />
spread <strong>in</strong> a susceptible cultivar such as IR64, which leads rapidly<br />
to plant death. Conversely, the partial resistance of Azucena<br />
was clearly expressed as a delay of virus spread <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>oculated<br />
plant. Virus content was not significantly detected before<br />
7 d post<strong>in</strong>oculation (dpi) and it was correlated with a lowered<br />
RNA accumulation until 14 dpi. Nevertheless, k<strong>in</strong>etics of<br />
the virus spread <strong>in</strong> Azucena showed that the resistance was<br />
rapidly overcome.<br />
Results<br />
Expression of the resistance<br />
The resistance found <strong>in</strong> Gigante and Tog5681 is expressed as<br />
a lack of symptoms <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>fected plants and was not overcome<br />
by any of the RYMV isolates tested.<br />
The virus replicates <strong>in</strong> the protoplasts of both resistant<br />
and susceptible varieties. We <strong>in</strong>directly demonstrated vascular<br />
movement of the virus throughout the resistant genotypes<br />
with no accumulation of virus genome <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>oculated leaves<br />
of different plant varieties.<br />
Molecular markers, QTL mapp<strong>in</strong>g, and marker-assisted selection 257
Number of <strong>in</strong>dividuals per class<br />
30<br />
25<br />
12%<br />
Gigante<br />
IR64<br />
Resistant F 2 Susceptible F 2<br />
20<br />
15<br />
7.5%<br />
Fig. 2. Segregation for RYMV and CAPS marker <strong>in</strong> the F 2 population<br />
(IR64 × Gigante).<br />
10<br />
4.5% 6%<br />
3%<br />
5<br />
19%<br />
1.5%<br />
15%<br />
0<br />
Allelic frequency of O. glaberrima (%)<br />
Fig. 1. Frequency of O. glaberrima alleles across <strong>in</strong>terspecific l<strong>in</strong>es.<br />
Inheritance of RYMV resistance <strong>in</strong> Tog5681<br />
and Gigante<br />
Plant regeneration by tiller splitt<strong>in</strong>g of 1-mo-old plants was<br />
performed to allow the evaluation of the virus titer of F 1 hybrids<br />
and that of different backcross-derived sterile plants. Any<br />
F 1 comb<strong>in</strong>ations between IR64 and the resistant parents,<br />
Tog5681 and Gigante, and 19 <strong>in</strong>terspecific backcross <strong>in</strong>dividuals<br />
[(IR64 × Tog5681) × IR64] were tested and gave a high<br />
ELISA response similar to IR64. These observations <strong>in</strong>dicated<br />
the recessive nature of the resistance. The reciprocal backcross<br />
[(IR64 × Tog5681) × Tog5681] gave a clear 1:1 segregation<br />
(χ 2 = 0.18), which was compatible with the presence of<br />
a s<strong>in</strong>gle recessive gene <strong>in</strong> Tog5681. Additionally, a backcross<br />
<strong>in</strong>dividual, BC 1 F 1 , was found to be fertile and gave F 2 progenies.<br />
The test <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g these F 2 progenies as well as testcrosses<br />
of the backcross sterile plants with the two parents<br />
revealed a very high and homogeneous susceptibility of the<br />
genetic material through both symptom scor<strong>in</strong>g and ELISA<br />
response. These results clearly confirmed that a s<strong>in</strong>gle recessive<br />
gene could expla<strong>in</strong> the distribution of <strong>in</strong>terspecific backcross<br />
progenies <strong>in</strong> two resistance classes. The frequency of O.<br />
glaberrima alleles <strong>in</strong> different <strong>in</strong>terspecific l<strong>in</strong>es is shown <strong>in</strong><br />
Figure 1.<br />
The segregation of resistance was identified <strong>in</strong> 65 (IR64<br />
× Gigante) F 2 plants <strong>in</strong>oculated with the BF 1 isolate. New<br />
emerg<strong>in</strong>g leaves of each F 2 plant were tested by ELISA. The<br />
ELISA responses clearly separated the F 2 plants <strong>in</strong>to two groups<br />
without <strong>in</strong>termediate values. In fact, the plants without symptoms<br />
gave the very low ELISA response found <strong>in</strong> Gigante.<br />
The other F 2 plants, whatever the symptom severity of the <strong>in</strong>oculated<br />
leaves, gave a high ELISA response similar to that of<br />
IR64. This cluster<strong>in</strong>g fits well a 3:1 segregation (χ 2 = 0.13)<br />
correspond<strong>in</strong>g to the presence of a s<strong>in</strong>gle recessive resistance<br />
gene <strong>in</strong> this F 2 population. Altogether, the two sources of resistance<br />
(Tog5681 and Gigante) showed the same recessive<br />
pattern of <strong>in</strong>heritance. The response to <strong>in</strong>fection of F 1 hybrids<br />
between Tog5681 and Gigante was very low and similar to<br />
l L<strong>in</strong>kage between M1, M3, and the resistance gene<br />
55 F 2 (IR64 ´ Gigante)<br />
{ 80 resistant F 2 (IR64 ´ Gigante)<br />
40 BC ((Tog5681 ´ IR64) ´ IR64)<br />
M1 Rymv-1 M3<br />
12.4 4.1<br />
15% rec.<br />
l Mapp<strong>in</strong>g of M1 on the IR64 ´ Azucena<br />
l<strong>in</strong>kage map<br />
Chromosome 4<br />
Rymv-1<br />
Xa-2, Pi-<br />
Xa-1, Gm2<br />
Fig. 3. Location of Rymv-1 on chromosome 4 of rice.<br />
CD0456<br />
G1184B<br />
RG190<br />
SB734a<br />
RG449<br />
RG788<br />
RZ565<br />
RZ675<br />
RZ740<br />
RG163<br />
RG214<br />
RZ590<br />
RG143<br />
RG620<br />
that of the parents. The resistance observed <strong>in</strong> (Tog5681 ×<br />
Gigante) F 1 hybrids was <strong>in</strong> favor of an identical resistance locus.<br />
F 3 progeny tests were carried out from the IR64 × Gigante<br />
cross. Each F 3 family (10 to 20 plants per family) was <strong>in</strong>oculated<br />
and symptom expression was assessed up to 2 mo after<br />
<strong>in</strong>oculation. The frequency of resistant plants fits with the expected<br />
segregation of 3:1 (χ 2 = 0.07). The classification of F 3<br />
families fits the 1:2:1 expected distribution with the segregation<br />
of a s<strong>in</strong>gle resistance gene (χ 2 = 1.36).<br />
Mapp<strong>in</strong>g of the CAPS marker l<strong>in</strong>ked to the RYMV<br />
resistance gene <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>terspecific reference map<br />
(IR64 × Azucena)<br />
Results showed segregation of the CAPS marker through the<br />
F 2 population between IR64 × Gigante (Fig. 2). The resistance<br />
to RYMV is recessive and controlled by a s<strong>in</strong>gle gene, Rymv-<br />
1, localized on chromosome 4 <strong>in</strong> the same region where other<br />
resistance genes are also located (Fig. 3).<br />
High resistance to RYMV was associated with very low<br />
virus accumulation throughout plant growth. Resistant plants,<br />
M1<br />
10 cM<br />
258 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
<strong>in</strong>oculated as early as 10 dpi, could complete a normal growth<br />
cycle and produce an abundant seed set. A similar pattern of<br />
resistance was found <strong>in</strong> O. breviligulata, which is the direct<br />
progenitor of O. glaberrima (Thottapilly and Russel 1993).<br />
Nevertheless, this high level of RYMV resistance is very rare<br />
<strong>in</strong> O. glaberrima and is found only <strong>in</strong> five cultivars among<br />
several hundred. The f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g of an exceptional cultivar of O.<br />
sativa with a resistance similar to that of an O. glaberrima<br />
resistant cultivar is novel for the follow<strong>in</strong>g reasons: (1) it is<br />
the first time that such high resistance is reported <strong>in</strong> O. sativa<br />
collections and nurseries despite <strong>in</strong>tensive RYMV resistance<br />
screen<strong>in</strong>g by national and <strong>in</strong>ternational <strong>in</strong>stitutions, (2) Gigante<br />
showed the typical morphological traits and lowland adaptation<br />
of a traditional <strong>in</strong>dica cultivar, whereas all the other <strong>in</strong>dica<br />
cultivars were found to be highly susceptible to RYMV,<br />
and (3) only quantitative resistance has been observed <strong>in</strong> upland<br />
rice cultivars <strong>in</strong> O. sativa.<br />
The resistance to RYMV was controlled by the same<br />
locus <strong>in</strong> Gigante and Tog5681 cultivars. The resistance mechanism<br />
was completely different from the polygenic partial resistance<br />
system found <strong>in</strong> upland cultivars of O. sativa. Identification<br />
of morphological-dependent and morphological-<strong>in</strong>dependent<br />
QTLs for RYMV resistance <strong>in</strong> the (IR64 × Azucena)<br />
doubled-haploid populations supported this hypothesis. RYMV<br />
resistance <strong>in</strong> Tog5681 and Gigante was caused by a mutation<br />
of a plant factor (only one prote<strong>in</strong>) necessary to the transport<br />
of the virus with<strong>in</strong> the mesophyll cells, s<strong>in</strong>ce the <strong>in</strong>heritance of<br />
RYMV resistance <strong>in</strong> these cultivars is monogenic and recessive.<br />
The very rare occurrence of high resistance to RYMV <strong>in</strong><br />
O. sativa as well as <strong>in</strong> O. glaberrima also strongly confirmed<br />
that it may have evolved from the mutation of the same host<br />
factor.<br />
The bulked segregant analysis method described by<br />
Michelmore et al (1991) was applied on the <strong>in</strong>terspecific and<br />
<strong>in</strong>traspecific progenies us<strong>in</strong>g amplified fragment length polymorphism<br />
markers. Of the six markers identified, one was transformed<br />
<strong>in</strong> codom<strong>in</strong>ant CAPS (cleaved amplified polymorphic<br />
sequence) and mapped on chromosome 4 close to other resistance<br />
genes on the reference (IR64 × Azucena) genetic l<strong>in</strong>kage<br />
map. The clon<strong>in</strong>g of the major recessive gene <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong><br />
the short-distance movement of RYMV would greatly help to<br />
identify the correspond<strong>in</strong>g genes <strong>in</strong> more complex plant genomes<br />
and to elucidate the unknown <strong>in</strong>teractions of their products<br />
with the movement prote<strong>in</strong> of potyviruses.<br />
References<br />
Michelmore RW, Paran I, Kesseli RV. 1991. Identification of markers<br />
l<strong>in</strong>ked to disease-resistance genes by bulked segregant<br />
analysis: a rapid method to detect markers <strong>in</strong> specific genomic<br />
regions by us<strong>in</strong>g segregat<strong>in</strong>g populations. Proc. Natl. Acad.<br />
Sci. 88:9828-9832.<br />
Thottapilly G, Russel HW. 1993. Evaluation of resistance to rice<br />
yellow mottle virus <strong>in</strong> Oryza species. Indian J. Virol. 9(1):65-<br />
73.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ addresses: M.N. Ndjiondjop-Nzenkam, M.P. Jones, West<br />
Africa <strong>Rice</strong> Development Association (WARDA), 01 B.P.<br />
2551, Bouaké 01, Côte d’Ivoire; D. Fargette, Centre<br />
<strong>International</strong>e pour la Recherche et le Developpement en<br />
Afrique de L’Quest; L. Albar, C. Brugidou, and A. Ghesquiere,<br />
Institut de Recherche pour le Developpement (IRD), Unité de<br />
Genetique Laboratoire Genetrop, 911 Avenue d’Agropolis,<br />
B.P. 5045, 34032 Montpellier Cedex 1, France.<br />
Partial resistance to rice yellow mottle virus: QTL<br />
identification, genetic model, and QTL efficiency<br />
analysis after marker-assisted <strong>in</strong>trogression<br />
N. Ahmadi, L. Albar, G. Pressoir, M. Lorieux, D. Fargette , and A. Ghesquière<br />
QTLs for rice yellow mottle virus resistance were mapped <strong>in</strong> a doubled-haploid population of rice, IR64/Azucena. Resistance<br />
was under polygenic control and 15 QTLs were detected on seven chromosomal fragments. For all the resistance QTLs<br />
detected, the favorable allele was provided by the resistant parent Azucena. Us<strong>in</strong>g different resistance parameters and two<br />
environments, three genomic fragments <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> resistance were po<strong>in</strong>ted out. These segments were also <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> plant<br />
architecture and development. Significant correlations were observed between resistance and tiller<strong>in</strong>g ability. A resistance QTL<br />
<strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> leaf virus content mapped on chromosome 12 (QTL 12<br />
) was found to be <strong>in</strong>dependent of plant morphology. A search<br />
of <strong>in</strong>teractions between this QTL and the rest of the genome and between this QTL and morphological traits segregat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the<br />
population showed that a complementary epistasis between QTL 12<br />
and a QTL located on chromosome 7 (QTL 7<br />
) was the major<br />
genetic factor controll<strong>in</strong>g the virus content. Marker-assisted selection was performed to <strong>in</strong>trogress the resistance allele of QTL 12<br />
and QTL 7<br />
from Azucena <strong>in</strong>to IR64. After three cycles of marker-assisted backcrosses, the proportion of the recipient genome <strong>in</strong><br />
the selected plant was close to 95% for the 10 noncarrier chromosomes, and the length of the donor chromosome segment<br />
surround<strong>in</strong>g the two QTLs was less than 20 cM. Evaluation of the level of resistance <strong>in</strong> BC 1<br />
F 3<br />
and BC 2<br />
F 3<br />
l<strong>in</strong>es confirmed the<br />
relevance of the complementary epistasis genetic model proposed.<br />
Molecular markers, QTL mapp<strong>in</strong>g, and marker-assisted selection 259
<strong>Rice</strong> yellow mottle virus (RYMV), first described <strong>in</strong> 1974<br />
(Bakker 1974), is now, with blast, the most damag<strong>in</strong>g disease<br />
of rice <strong>in</strong> Africa, where it is endemic. It occurs <strong>in</strong> all ricegrow<strong>in</strong>g<br />
ecosystems, but <strong>in</strong>cidence is particularly high <strong>in</strong> the<br />
irrigated ecosystem with high-yield<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dica varieties. Susceptible<br />
varieties show yellow<strong>in</strong>g, mottl<strong>in</strong>g, stunt<strong>in</strong>g, and sterility.<br />
Control of the vector is of limited use aga<strong>in</strong>st RYMV<br />
spread (Abo et al 1998). The most promis<strong>in</strong>g strategy is the<br />
development of resistant varieties.<br />
Three types of varietal resistance to RYMV are known:<br />
a resistance obta<strong>in</strong>ed through genetic transformation (P<strong>in</strong>to et<br />
al 1999), a natural high resistance (Ndjiondjop et al 1999),<br />
and a natural partial resistance (PR) (Ghesquière et al 1997).<br />
The natural high resistance is rare and observed <strong>in</strong> a few varieties<br />
of Oryza glaberrima and <strong>in</strong> only one variety of O. sativa.<br />
The PR to RYMV—limited symptoms, limited effect on plant<br />
development, and reduced virus content—is more widely distributed.<br />
All varieties with a significant PR belong to tropical<br />
japonica and are not adapted to lowland cultivation. We present<br />
here results on (1) mapp<strong>in</strong>g of resistance quantitative trait loci<br />
(QTLs), (2) the effect of plant morphology and genetic background<br />
on RYMV resistance, (3) marker-assisted <strong>in</strong>trogression<br />
(MAI) of the major genetic factors controll<strong>in</strong>g the virus<br />
content (VC) from an upland japonica variety, Azucena, <strong>in</strong>to a<br />
lowland susceptible <strong>in</strong>dica variety, IR64, and (4) efficiency of<br />
the genetic model proposed.<br />
Materials and methods<br />
One hundred and seventeen doubled-haploid (DH) l<strong>in</strong>es of the<br />
IR64/Azucena cross were used. For each DH l<strong>in</strong>e, plant morphology<br />
and field-level resistance were characterized <strong>in</strong> the<br />
IER research station <strong>in</strong> Mali and VC was assessed <strong>in</strong> a growth<br />
chamber <strong>in</strong> Montpellier, France (Albar et al 1998). Field resistance<br />
was evaluated through disease effect after <strong>in</strong>oculation<br />
on plant morphology and development: height and number of<br />
tillers 8 wk after sow<strong>in</strong>g (H8r and T8r), height and number of<br />
fertile tillers at maturity (HMr and TMr), head<strong>in</strong>g date (HDr),<br />
gra<strong>in</strong> weight (GWr), symptom expression, and plant VC. Plant<br />
VC was evaluated through enzyme-l<strong>in</strong>ked immunosorbent assay.<br />
The QTL analysis method was described by Albar et al<br />
(1998). As a QTL strongly <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> VC has been identified<br />
on chromosome 12, a wide search was performed to f<strong>in</strong>d <strong>in</strong>teractions<br />
between this QTL and the rest of the genome and<br />
between this QTL and morphological traits segregat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the<br />
population (Pressoir et al 1998). To <strong>in</strong>trogress two resistance<br />
QTLs from Azucena to IR64, three cycles of molecular markerassisted<br />
backcross breed<strong>in</strong>g were carried out us<strong>in</strong>g restriction<br />
fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) and microsatellite<br />
markers. Concurrently, phenotypic control was performed <strong>in</strong><br />
controlled conditions on F 2 plants of each backcross generation.<br />
The relationship between the allelic status of QTL 12 and<br />
QTL 7 markers and leaf VC was analyzed <strong>in</strong> 12 BC 1 F 3 and 12<br />
BC 2 F 3 l<strong>in</strong>es, homozygous for the two QTL markers, <strong>in</strong> controlled<br />
conditions (Ahmadi et al 2001).<br />
Results and discussion<br />
Mapp<strong>in</strong>g of resistance QTLs<br />
A total of 15 QTLs were detected on seven chromosome regions<br />
(Albar et al 1998). For all these QTLs, the favorable<br />
allele was provided by the resistant parent Azucena. Analysis<br />
based on HMr, T8r, H8r, and HDr detected four QTLs on chromosome<br />
1, <strong>in</strong> the region of sd1. These QTLs expla<strong>in</strong>ed 17%,<br />
22%, 12%, and 15% of phenotypic variance observed on HMr,<br />
T8r, H8r, and HDr, respectively. For GWr, two QTLs were<br />
detected on chromosome 4 and chromosome 1, <strong>in</strong> the region<br />
of sd1. These QTLs expla<strong>in</strong>ed 31% of the variation. The QTL<br />
mapped on chromosome 4 was co-located with a QTL implicated<br />
<strong>in</strong> HDr. For VC assessed on plants grown <strong>in</strong> the field,<br />
one QTL was mapped on chromosome 1, <strong>in</strong> the region where<br />
QTLs controll<strong>in</strong>g field resistance had been detected. This QTL<br />
expla<strong>in</strong>ed 28% of the phenotypic variation observed on this<br />
character. F<strong>in</strong>ally, for VC <strong>in</strong> plants grown <strong>in</strong> the growth chamber,<br />
four QTLs on chromosomes 1, 2, 8, and 12 were found.<br />
Among all resistance QTLs detected, the one mapped on chromosome<br />
12 (QTL 12 ) has an important effect on leaf VC as<br />
well as on symptoms <strong>in</strong> the field, and did not co-localize with<br />
any plant aerial-part morphology QTL.<br />
Search for <strong>in</strong>teractions between QTL 12<br />
and the rest<br />
of the genome<br />
This search provided evidence that a complementary epistasis<br />
between QTL 12 and an RFLP marker close to a tiller<strong>in</strong>g QTL<br />
located on chromosome 7 (QTL 7 ) could be the major genetic<br />
factor controll<strong>in</strong>g VC. The percentage of variance expla<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
by this <strong>in</strong>teraction (36.5%) was much higher than the one expla<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
by RG869 alone (21%). Resistance was also affected<br />
by a morphology-dependent resistance s<strong>in</strong>ce tiller<strong>in</strong>g was <strong>in</strong>terfer<strong>in</strong>g<br />
with the resistance mechanism conditioned by the<br />
epistasis between the two QTLs (Pressoir et al 1998).<br />
Marker-assisted <strong>in</strong>trogression of QTL 12<br />
and QTL 7<br />
The <strong>in</strong>trogression process (Fig. 1) started with one of the DH<br />
l<strong>in</strong>es of IR64/Azucena, which already had a predom<strong>in</strong>ant<br />
(60%) IR64 genetic background and a high level of resistance<br />
associated with the Azucena alleles at QTL 12 and QTL 7 . This<br />
DH l<strong>in</strong>e also showed recomb<strong>in</strong>ation on each side of QTL 12 . In<br />
BC 1 , a noncarrier chromosome selection was performed. In<br />
BC 2 , selection was carried out for the resistance allele on the<br />
two QTLs. The backcross process was then pursued with a<br />
BC 2 F 2 plant homozygous for the resistance allele of QTL 12<br />
and QTL 7 . In BC 3 , a background selection was performed with<br />
microsatellite markers chosen on the basis of genetic conformation<br />
of the selected BC 1 plant (Fig. 2A). In the selected<br />
BC 3 progeny, the proportion of the recipient genome was close<br />
to 95% for the 10 noncarrier chromosomes, and the length of<br />
the donor chromosome segment surround<strong>in</strong>g the two QTLs<br />
was less than 20 cM (Fig. 2B). This successful MAI was not <strong>in</strong><br />
strict conformation with recommendations of analytical and<br />
simulation studies. This result po<strong>in</strong>ts to the efficiency and<br />
methodological flexibility of MAI.<br />
260 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
Complementary epistasis between QTL 12<br />
and QTL 7<br />
and QTL efficiency<br />
With<strong>in</strong> the BC 1 F 3 and BC 2 F 3 l<strong>in</strong>es, the allelic status of QTL 12<br />
and QTL 7 had a significant effect on plant VC, at P
A<br />
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12<br />
B<br />
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12<br />
Fig. 2. Genetic constitution of the selected<br />
(A) BC 1 F 1 and (B) BC 3 F 1 plants. In<br />
white, chromosomal segments from the<br />
recipient parent IR64; <strong>in</strong> black, chromosomal<br />
segments from the donor parent<br />
Azucena. Arrow <strong>in</strong>dicates the position of<br />
the microsatellite marker loci used for<br />
background selection <strong>in</strong> BC 3 .<br />
Table 1. Allelic status of QTL 12 and QTL 7 and leaf virus content <strong>in</strong><br />
BC 1 and BC 2 progenies.<br />
Genotype<br />
Leaf virus content a<br />
QTL 12 marker QTL 7 marker BC 1 -F 3 l<strong>in</strong>es b BC 2 -F 3 l<strong>in</strong>es b<br />
R 12 R 12 R 7 R 7 0.443 a 0.305 a<br />
R 12 R 12 S 7 S 7 0.553 ab 0.450 b<br />
S 12 S 12 R 7 R 7 0.597 ab 0.619 c<br />
S 12 S 12 S 7 S 7 0.815 b 0.650 c<br />
Azucena 0.184 0.238<br />
IR64 0.968 0.661<br />
a Leaf virus content (VC) is expressed <strong>in</strong> absorbance (405 nm) measured by ELISA<br />
test. b VC data of parents were not submitted to statistical analysis; VCs followed by<br />
the same letter <strong>in</strong> each column are not significantly different accord<strong>in</strong>g to Newman-<br />
Keuls test, P = 0.05 for BC 1 F 3 and P = 0.01 for BC 2 F 3 .<br />
P<strong>in</strong>to Y, Kok R, Baulcombe D. 1999. Resistance to rice yellow mottle<br />
virus <strong>in</strong> cultivated African rice varieties conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g RYMV<br />
transgenes. Nat. Biotechnol. 17:702-707.<br />
Pressoir G, Albar L, Ahmadi N, Rimbault I, Lorieux M, Fargette D,<br />
Ghesquière A. 1998. Genetic basis and mapp<strong>in</strong>g of the resistance<br />
to rice yellow mottle virus. II. Evidence of a complementary<br />
epistasis between two QTLs. Theor. Appl. Genet.<br />
97:1155-1161.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ addresses: N. Ahmadi, CIRAD-CA/CALIM, Avenue<br />
Agropolis, 34398 Montpellier Cedex 5; L. Albar, G. Pressoir,<br />
M. Lorieux, A. Ghesquière, LPRC, ORSTOM/CIRAD,<br />
BP5035, 34032 Montpellier Cedex; D. Fargette, Unité<br />
Génétique, GeneTrop, ORSTOM, BP5045, 34032 Montpellier<br />
Cedex, France.<br />
262 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
Construct<strong>in</strong>g l<strong>in</strong>kage maps of brown planthopper resistance<br />
genes Bph1, bph2, and Bph9 on rice chromosome 12<br />
H. Murai, P.N. Sharma, K. Murata, Z. Hashimoto, Y. Ketipearachi, T. Shimizu,<br />
S. Takumi, N. Mori, S. Kawasaki, and C. Nakamura<br />
Genetic analysis of three brown planthopper (BPH) resistance genes—Bph1, bph2, and Bph9—was conducted us<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
segregat<strong>in</strong>g populations derived from crosses of Tsukushibare with Nor<strong>in</strong>-PL3 (a Bph1 <strong>in</strong>trogression l<strong>in</strong>e), Nor<strong>in</strong>-PL4 (a bph2<br />
<strong>in</strong>trogression l<strong>in</strong>e), or Pokkali (donor of Bph9). BPH bioassays showed that Bph1 and Bph9 were s<strong>in</strong>gle dom<strong>in</strong>ant genes, but<br />
a recessive gene, bph2, reportedly also behaved as a dom<strong>in</strong>ant gene. Restriction fragment length polymorphism, amplified<br />
fragment length polymorphism, and random amplified polymorphic DNA markers were selected by bulk segregant analysis.<br />
Bph1 was mapped on the long arm of chromosome 12, with the closest marker be<strong>in</strong>g at 3.1 cM. bph2 and Bph9 were mapped<br />
at the regions proximal to the Bph1 locus. With<strong>in</strong> 3.2 cM cover<strong>in</strong>g the bph2 locus, n<strong>in</strong>e AFLP markers were identified, one of<br />
which showed complete cosegregation. bph2 was located with<strong>in</strong> the 1.0-cM distance between two other flank<strong>in</strong>g markers.<br />
Together with the known Bph10(t) locus from Oryza australiensis, our results revealed the cluster<strong>in</strong>g of four functional BPH<br />
resistance genes on the long arm of rice chromosome 12. The construction of a f<strong>in</strong>e l<strong>in</strong>kage map of bph2 should help mapbased<br />
clon<strong>in</strong>g and marker-assisted pyramid<strong>in</strong>g with other BPH resistance genes.<br />
Brown planthopper (BPH) is one of the most serious <strong>in</strong>sect<br />
pests of rice <strong>in</strong> Asia. Little is known about the molecular nature<br />
of BPH resistance genes and the mechanism of BPH resistance.<br />
Eleven BPH resistance genes have so far been identified<br />
<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>dica rice varieties and two wild relatives. Three of<br />
them (Bph1, bph2, and Bph10(t)) have been mapped on rice<br />
chromosome 12 (Ishii et al 1994, Hirabayashi and Ogawa 1995,<br />
Murata et al 1997, 1998). We attempted to construct l<strong>in</strong>kage<br />
maps of three BPH resistance genes, Bph1, bph2, and Bph9.<br />
Materials and methods<br />
A BPH-susceptible cultivar, Tsukushibare, two <strong>in</strong>trogression<br />
l<strong>in</strong>es with BPH resistance genes, Nor<strong>in</strong>-PL3 (Bph1) and Nor<strong>in</strong>-<br />
PL4 (bph2), and Pokkali (Bph9) were used. F 2 and F 3 progenies<br />
derived from Tsukushibare/Nor<strong>in</strong>-PL3 were used for<br />
Bph1. For bph2, one heterozygous F 2 plant derived from<br />
Tsukushibare/Nor<strong>in</strong>-PL4 was selected. This F 2 plant possessed<br />
a 9.8-cM segment <strong>in</strong>trogressed from the resistance donor after<br />
marker recomb<strong>in</strong>ation outside of the bph2 locus. This recomb<strong>in</strong>ant<br />
F 2 plant was used to obta<strong>in</strong> F 3 plants. F 4 and F 5 progenies<br />
were derived after self-fertilization of two heterozygous<br />
F 3 plants that showed identical marker genotypes with<strong>in</strong> the<br />
<strong>in</strong>trogressed region. For Bph9, F 2 , F 3 , and F 4 plants from<br />
Tsukushibare/Pokkali were used. Tsukushibare, Nor<strong>in</strong>-PL3,<br />
Nor<strong>in</strong>-PL4, and Pokkali served as susceptible and resistant<br />
controls <strong>in</strong> the follow<strong>in</strong>g BPH bioassay and bulk segregant<br />
analysis.<br />
Conditions for the BPH bioassay us<strong>in</strong>g bulk seedl<strong>in</strong>gs<br />
were similar to those described by Murata et al (1998). Genotypes<br />
for BPH resistance/susceptibility of F 2 s (for Bph1) and<br />
F 4 s (for bph2) were determ<strong>in</strong>ed by assay<strong>in</strong>g F 3 s and F 5 s, respectively.<br />
For Bph9, genotypes of F 2 s were determ<strong>in</strong>ed us<strong>in</strong>g<br />
F 4 s <strong>in</strong> the bioassay.<br />
DNA was extracted from 15 RR (resistant) and 16 SS<br />
(susceptible) F 3 l<strong>in</strong>es after determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the BPH genotypes of<br />
<strong>in</strong>dividual F 2 s. For bph2 and Bph9, DNA was extracted from<br />
10 RR and 10 SS F 4 s and F 3 s, respectively, and comb<strong>in</strong>ed to<br />
prepare RR and SS bulk DNA. The bulk DNA was used together<br />
with the parental DNA <strong>in</strong> the bulk segregant analysis to<br />
detect polymorphic markers associated with BPH resistance/<br />
susceptibility. Restriction fragment length polymorphism<br />
(RFLP) markers were detected by Southern blot analysis accord<strong>in</strong>g<br />
to Murata et al (1998). Bulk segregant analysis us<strong>in</strong>g<br />
amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) markers was<br />
performed accord<strong>in</strong>g to the supplier’s <strong>in</strong>structions (GIBCO-<br />
BRL). Amplified products were fractionated by electrophoresis<br />
through 13% polyacrylamide gel and sta<strong>in</strong>ed with silversta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />
reagents (BIORAD). A high-efficiency AFLP genomescann<strong>in</strong>g<br />
system developed by Kawasaki et al (1999) was applied<br />
to analyze bph2. In this system, amplified products were<br />
visualized by sta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g with Sil-Best Sta<strong>in</strong> TM for prote<strong>in</strong>/PAGE<br />
(Nacalai Tesque, Japan). For Bph9, the random amplified polymorphic<br />
DNA (RAPD) marker system was applied together<br />
with the RFLP marker system. RAPD-polymerase cha<strong>in</strong> reaction<br />
analysis was performed us<strong>in</strong>g 240 random 10-mer primers<br />
(Operon Technologies Inc.).<br />
L<strong>in</strong>kage analysis of Bph1 was conducted us<strong>in</strong>g 262 F 2 s,<br />
whereas 224 F 4 s were used for bph2. Because of high sterility<br />
<strong>in</strong> the cross Tsukushibare/Pokkali, only 62 F 2 s could be studied<br />
for Bph9. The recomb<strong>in</strong>ation values were calculated by<br />
MAPMAKER and l<strong>in</strong>kage maps were constructed based on<br />
LOD scores greater than 3.0.<br />
Results and discussion<br />
Segregation of BPH resistance conferred by Bph1 was studied<br />
<strong>in</strong> 262 F 2 <strong>in</strong>dividuals derived from Tsukushibare/Nor<strong>in</strong>-PL3.<br />
Molecular markers, QTL mapp<strong>in</strong>g, and marker-assisted selection 263
Nipponbare/Kasalath<br />
Chromosome 12, short arm side<br />
cM<br />
Marker<br />
TEL2A<br />
G24B<br />
C732B<br />
R642B<br />
Tsukushibare/Nor<strong>in</strong>-PL3<br />
cM<br />
Marker<br />
C751<br />
C1336<br />
R2672A<br />
Tsukushibare/Pokkali<br />
4.3<br />
1.8<br />
2.2<br />
5.0<br />
3.1<br />
2.2<br />
2.6<br />
0.8<br />
1.1<br />
3.3<br />
S1786A<br />
G402<br />
RZ261<br />
Bph1<br />
em24<br />
R2708<br />
em32<br />
C87<br />
G148<br />
C454<br />
CEN<br />
Bph10(t)<br />
R3375<br />
R617<br />
C443<br />
S826<br />
G2140<br />
Bph9<br />
S11679<br />
G402<br />
S2545<br />
bph2<br />
GR457<br />
Bph1<br />
C2808<br />
R2708<br />
R1709<br />
C87<br />
G148<br />
C1069<br />
R1684<br />
C901<br />
S1786A<br />
C751<br />
R643B<br />
C454<br />
Marker<br />
R617<br />
C443<br />
ORF15<br />
G2140<br />
OPR04<br />
Bph9<br />
S2545<br />
cM<br />
2.5<br />
4.4<br />
7.5<br />
8.7<br />
8.8<br />
12.5<br />
6.1<br />
C2808, R3106<br />
R1709 2.5<br />
Tsukushibare/Nor<strong>in</strong>-PL4<br />
cM Marker<br />
KAM1<br />
0.5<br />
KAM2<br />
0.5<br />
KAM3<br />
0.2<br />
bph2<br />
KAM4<br />
0.8<br />
KAM5<br />
0.3<br />
KAM6<br />
KAM7<br />
0.9<br />
KAM8<br />
Fig. 1. Map positions of<br />
Bph1, bph2, Bph9, and<br />
Bph10(t). The second map<br />
from the left is the standard<br />
Nipponbare/Kasalath map<br />
of rice chromosome 12<br />
(Harushima et al 1998). The<br />
map on the left is for Bph1<br />
and the two maps at the<br />
right are for Bph9 and bph2.<br />
Map positions of Bph1,<br />
bph2, Bph9, and Bph10(t)<br />
(Ishii et al 1994) are <strong>in</strong>dicated<br />
on the standard map.<br />
These map positions are<br />
arbitrary because they were<br />
determ<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> different<br />
mapp<strong>in</strong>g populations. CEN<br />
= centromere.<br />
The F 2 segregation of RR, RS, and SS fit <strong>in</strong> the expected 1:2:1<br />
ratio. These RFLP markers were selected from the region on<br />
chromosome 12 based on a previous mapp<strong>in</strong>g study (Murata<br />
et al 1997). Three S-associated dom<strong>in</strong>ant, one R-associated<br />
dom<strong>in</strong>ant, and four R/S-associated codom<strong>in</strong>ant RFLP markers<br />
were identified. In addition, one R-associated dom<strong>in</strong>ant<br />
and one codom<strong>in</strong>ant AFLP marker were identified. Segregation<br />
of all the detected markers did not deviate from the expected<br />
3:1 or 1:2:1 ratio, depend<strong>in</strong>g on dom<strong>in</strong>ance and<br />
codom<strong>in</strong>ance, respectively. Bph1 was mapped on the long arm<br />
of chromosome 12 (Fig. 1). A codom<strong>in</strong>ant AFLP marker<br />
(em24) was closest to the Bph1 locus, with a distance of 3.1<br />
cM.<br />
Segregation of BPH resistance conferred by the reportedly<br />
recessive gene bph2 was studied us<strong>in</strong>g 224 F 4 s derived<br />
from the cross Tsukushibare/Nor<strong>in</strong>-PL4. BPH genotypes of<br />
<strong>in</strong>dividual F 4 s were determ<strong>in</strong>ed after a bioassay of the F 5 s.<br />
The F 4 segregation of RR, RS, and SS did not deviate from the<br />
1:2:1 ratio, but the segregation of F 5 s from RS F 4 s showed the<br />
dom<strong>in</strong>ant nature of bph2. This conflict<strong>in</strong>g result agreed with a<br />
previous one obta<strong>in</strong>ed us<strong>in</strong>g 159 F 2 s from the same cross comb<strong>in</strong>ation<br />
(Murata et al 1998). PCR us<strong>in</strong>g 21 of 1,344 primer<br />
comb<strong>in</strong>ations resulted <strong>in</strong> amplification of R- or S-associated<br />
polymorphic bands. After a prelim<strong>in</strong>ary experiment us<strong>in</strong>g 64<br />
F 4 s, two S-associated and six R-associated markers were selected<br />
as closely l<strong>in</strong>ked to bph2 and used <strong>in</strong> a further mapp<strong>in</strong>g<br />
264 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
study of 224 F 4 s. They all showed the expected 3:1 segregation<br />
ratio. Three AFLP markers were located at the region<br />
proximal to the bph2 locus, with distances of 0.2 to 1.2 cM<br />
(Fig. 1). The other four AFLP markers were at the region distal<br />
from the bph2 locus, with distances of 0.8 to 2.0 cM. One<br />
AFLP marker (KAM4) showed complete cosegregation, and<br />
bph2 was mapped with<strong>in</strong> 1.0 cM between two other flank<strong>in</strong>g<br />
markers.<br />
Segregation analysis of 62 F 2 s (determ<strong>in</strong>ed by F 3 genotypes<br />
after bioassay of F 4 progenies) derived from<br />
Tsukushibare/Pokkali showed that Bph9 behaved as a s<strong>in</strong>gle<br />
dom<strong>in</strong>ant gene. Bph9 was mapped close to the locus of bph2<br />
with seven RFLP and two RAPD markers (Fig. 1). The closest<br />
RAPD marker (OPR04) was 8.8 cM from the Bph9 locus.<br />
We constructed l<strong>in</strong>kage maps of the three BPH resistance<br />
genes on the long arm of rice chromosome 12. The l<strong>in</strong>kage<br />
map of bph2 has been ref<strong>in</strong>ed. In comparison with Bph10(t)<br />
from Oryza australiensis (Ishii et al 1994), our result showed<br />
that loci of the four functional BPH resistance genes are clustered<br />
on this chromosomal region. The f<strong>in</strong>e l<strong>in</strong>kage map of<br />
bph2 would be important for clon<strong>in</strong>g this important gene and<br />
for pyramid<strong>in</strong>g it with other BPH resistance genes.<br />
References<br />
Harushima Y, Yano M, Shomura A, Sato M, Shimano T, Kuboki Y,<br />
Yamamoto T, L<strong>in</strong> SY, Antonio BA, Parco A, Kajiya H, Huang<br />
N, Yamamoto K, Nagamura Y, Kurata N, Khush GS, Sasaki<br />
T. 1998. A high-density rice genetic map with 2275 markers<br />
us<strong>in</strong>g a s<strong>in</strong>gle F 2 population. <strong>Genetics</strong> 148:479-494.<br />
Hirabayashi H, Ogawa T. 1995. RFLP mapp<strong>in</strong>g of Bph-1 (brown<br />
planthopper resistance gene) <strong>in</strong> rice. Jpn. J. Breed. 45:369-<br />
371.<br />
Ishii T, Brar DS, Multani DS, Khush GS. 1994. Molecular tagg<strong>in</strong>g<br />
of genes for brown planthopper resistance and earl<strong>in</strong>ess<br />
<strong>in</strong>trogressed from Oryza australiensis <strong>in</strong>to cultivated rice, O.<br />
sativa. Genome 37:217-221.<br />
Kawasaki S, Motomura T, Kamihara K. 1999. Development of a<br />
high-efficiency AFLP genome scann<strong>in</strong>g system. Jpn. Soc. Mol.<br />
Biol. 22:520. (An abstract, <strong>in</strong> Japanese.)<br />
Murata K, Nakamura C, Fujiwara M, Mori N, Kaneda C. 1997. Tagg<strong>in</strong>g<br />
and mapp<strong>in</strong>g of brown planthopper resistance genes <strong>in</strong><br />
rice. In: Su J-C, editor. Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs of the 5th <strong>International</strong><br />
Symposium on <strong>Rice</strong> Molecular Biology. Taipei (Taiwan): Yi-<br />
Hsien Pub. p 217-231.<br />
Murata K, Fujiwara M, Kaneda C, Takumi S, Mori N, Nakamura C.<br />
1998. RFLP mapp<strong>in</strong>g of a brown planthopper (Nilaparvata<br />
lugens Stål) resistance gene bph2 of <strong>in</strong>dica rice <strong>in</strong>trogressed<br />
<strong>in</strong>to a japonica breed<strong>in</strong>g l<strong>in</strong>e ‘Nor<strong>in</strong>-PL4’. Genes Genet. Syst.<br />
73:359-364.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ addresses: H. Murai, P.N. Sharma, K. Murata, Z.<br />
Hashimoto, Y. Ketipearachi, T. Shimizu, S. Takumi, N. Mori,<br />
and C. Nakamura, Laboratory of Plant <strong>Genetics</strong>, Faculty of<br />
Agriculture, Kobe University, Nada-ku, Kobe 657-8501, Japan;<br />
S. Kawasaki, National Institute of Agrobiological Resources,<br />
2-1-2 Kannondai, Tsukuba 305-8602, Japan.<br />
Molecular mapp<strong>in</strong>g and marker-aided selection of a gene<br />
conferr<strong>in</strong>g resistance to an Indian biotype of brown<br />
planthopper <strong>in</strong> rice<br />
K.K. Jena, I.C. Pasalu, Y. Varalaxmi, Y. Kondala Rao, K. Krishnaiah, G. Kochert, and G.S. Khush<br />
Brown planthopper (BPH) is one of the most destructive <strong>in</strong>sect pests of rice <strong>in</strong> the Indian subcont<strong>in</strong>ent. The BPH biotype of<br />
India is different from other known biotypes. The <strong>in</strong>trogression l<strong>in</strong>e IR54741-3-21-22, developed from the cross of Oryza<br />
sativa/O. offic<strong>in</strong>alis, expressed a high level of resistance to BPH after test<strong>in</strong>g at the Directorate of <strong>Rice</strong> Research, Hyderabad,<br />
India. The resistance <strong>in</strong> this l<strong>in</strong>e was controlled by a s<strong>in</strong>gle dom<strong>in</strong>ant gene. DNA isolated from parents and <strong>in</strong>dividual F 2<br />
plants<br />
was amplified with 270 random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) primers and polymerase cha<strong>in</strong> reaction (PCR)-based RAPD<br />
polymorphism (dom<strong>in</strong>ant and codom<strong>in</strong>ant) was detected. Of the 19 primers produc<strong>in</strong>g a codom<strong>in</strong>ant type of polymorphism,<br />
only one primer (OPA16) could produce resistance- (938 bp) and susceptibility- (802 bp) specific bands <strong>in</strong> bulk segregant<br />
analysis, which <strong>in</strong>dicated that the DNA marker OPA16 938<br />
might be a putative marker l<strong>in</strong>ked to the resistance gene. The<br />
resistance-specific 938-bp DNA fragment was cloned and long primers of 18–20 bp were developed, which produced specific<br />
PCR fragments cosegregat<strong>in</strong>g with resistance genes. The resistance-specific marker (938 bp) was mapped onto chromosome<br />
11 of rice. The resistance-specific marker band was absent <strong>in</strong> most of the rice cultivars, except <strong>in</strong> Swarnalata, which showed<br />
the presence of a homologous 938-bp DNA fragment. The result <strong>in</strong>dicated that the resistance gene <strong>in</strong> Swarnalata (Bph-6) may<br />
be the same as that <strong>in</strong> IR54741-3-21-22. The DNA marker OPA16 938<br />
would be useful <strong>in</strong> marker-aided selection.<br />
Molecular markers, QTL mapp<strong>in</strong>g, and marker-assisted selection 265
<strong>Rice</strong> is the staple food of more than half of the world’s population.<br />
Diseases and <strong>in</strong>sects are the major constra<strong>in</strong>ts to <strong>in</strong>creased<br />
rice production and productivity. Brown planthopper<br />
(BPH) is one of the most destructive <strong>in</strong>sect pests of rice and<br />
causes considerable damage by direct feed<strong>in</strong>g and by transmitt<strong>in</strong>g<br />
grassy stunt and ragged stunt viral diseases (Khush<br />
and Brar 1991). The Indian biotype of BPH is highly virulent<br />
and differs from all other Southeast Asian biotypes. Host-plant<br />
resistance is an important approach to develop<strong>in</strong>g BPH-resistant<br />
cultivars.<br />
DNA markers provide a unique opportunity to map genes<br />
of agronomic importance. A comprehensive molecular map<br />
consist<strong>in</strong>g of more than 2,200 DNA markers is available <strong>in</strong><br />
rice (Harushima et al 1998). Molecular markers, comb<strong>in</strong>ed with<br />
bulk segregant analysis, have been used to identify markers<br />
closely l<strong>in</strong>ked to agronomically important traits (Michelmore<br />
et al 1991). Additionally, these random amplified polymorphic<br />
DNA (RAPD) markers may be converted <strong>in</strong>to highly repeatable<br />
and useful diagnostic markers such as sequence-characterized<br />
amplified regions (SCARs), which facilitate their use<br />
<strong>in</strong> mapp<strong>in</strong>g and marker-assisted selection (MAS). BPH resistance<br />
genes <strong>in</strong> rice have been mapped with restriction fragment<br />
length polymophism (RFLP) and RAPD markers (Ishii<br />
et al 1994, Jeon et al 1999). This <strong>in</strong>formation is useful <strong>in</strong> facilitat<strong>in</strong>g<br />
breed<strong>in</strong>g efforts aimed at develop<strong>in</strong>g more durable<br />
forms of resistance to BPH.<br />
The objectives of our study were to identify a polymerase<br />
cha<strong>in</strong> reaction (PCR)-based marker l<strong>in</strong>ked to the alien BPH<br />
resistance gene <strong>in</strong>trogressed from the wild species Oryza<br />
offic<strong>in</strong>alis, its chromosomal localization, and its application<br />
for MAS.<br />
Materials and methods<br />
The <strong>in</strong>trogression l<strong>in</strong>e IR54741-3-21-22 was used as the resistant<br />
parent and the elite breed<strong>in</strong>g l<strong>in</strong>e IR31917-45-3-2 was<br />
used as the susceptible parent. N<strong>in</strong>ety-five F 3 progenies were<br />
screened aga<strong>in</strong>st the Indian BPH biotype at the entomology<br />
glasshouse of the Directorate of <strong>Rice</strong> Research (DRR),<br />
Hyderabad. The wild species O. offic<strong>in</strong>alis (<strong>IRRI</strong> Acc.<br />
100896), a donor of BPH resistance, was also <strong>in</strong>cluded.<br />
Doubled-haploid (DH) l<strong>in</strong>es (127) derived from IR64/Azucena<br />
were used for mapp<strong>in</strong>g the RAPD marker onto the rice RFLP<br />
map. Other varieties such as TN1, IR8, Jaya, IR24, IR28, IR36,<br />
IR54, IR72, Ptb33, ARC6650, Pokkali, Swarnalata, and T-12<br />
were used for study<strong>in</strong>g the presence/absence of resistance-specific<br />
RAPD markers.<br />
Markers l<strong>in</strong>ked to BPH resistance were identified by bulk<br />
segregant analysis (Michelmore et al 1991). Fourteen F 2 <strong>in</strong>dividuals<br />
were used <strong>in</strong> the resistant and susceptible bulk on the<br />
basis of their reaction to BPH. RAPD amplifications were performed<br />
on DNA from both parents, the two bulks, and F 2 <strong>in</strong>dividuals<br />
follow<strong>in</strong>g the protocols of Williams et al (1990).<br />
A resistance-specific RAPD fragment was excised from<br />
the gel and purified us<strong>in</strong>g the Concert Rapid gel extraction<br />
kit of Gibco-BRL, USA. The fragment was ligated directly<br />
<strong>in</strong>to the TOPO-TA Clon<strong>in</strong>g® system developed by Invitrogen,<br />
USA. The presence of the fragment <strong>in</strong> the clone was assessed<br />
by PCR screen<strong>in</strong>g of the bacterial colonies us<strong>in</strong>g the M13 forward<br />
and reverse primers and verified by perform<strong>in</strong>g an alkal<strong>in</strong>e<br />
lysis preparation of plasmid DNA and subsequent EcoRI<br />
digestion of the <strong>in</strong>sert fragment from the plasmid. Doublestranded<br />
sequenc<strong>in</strong>g of the cloned fragment was performed.<br />
Two specific oligonucleotides were designed from the<br />
sequence obta<strong>in</strong>ed for the marker band. Amplification of genomic<br />
DNA with SCAR primers was done under the same<br />
conditions as the RAPD reaction, except for the anneal<strong>in</strong>g temperature<br />
(60 o C). The SCAR-amplified products were digested<br />
with CfoI enzyme and resolved on 2.0% agarose gels.<br />
The cloned RAPD product was used as a hybridization<br />
probe to blots of genomic DNA digested with 11 restriction<br />
enzymes. Polymorphic DNA fragments were detected among<br />
the mapp<strong>in</strong>g population, IR64, and Azucena parents at the ClaI<br />
site. The genotypes for the restriction fragment from the 127<br />
DH plants were scored. Scores were <strong>in</strong>corporated <strong>in</strong>to the data<br />
pool on the RFLP map (Huang et al 1994). Genetic l<strong>in</strong>kage<br />
analysis was performed us<strong>in</strong>g MAPMAKER Software 3.0<br />
(Lander et al 1987) and DH framework data as described by<br />
Huang et al (1997). Marker order was determ<strong>in</strong>ed with an LOD<br />
score > 2.0. Distance of markers (cM) on the map was estimated<br />
us<strong>in</strong>g the Kosambi (1944) function.<br />
Results<br />
The F 1 of the cross between IR54741-3-21-22 and IR31917-<br />
45-3-2 was resistant to the Indian biotype of BPH, <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g<br />
that BPH resistance is controlled by a dom<strong>in</strong>ant gene. Segregation<br />
analysis us<strong>in</strong>g 95 F 3 progeny rows <strong>in</strong> three replications<br />
showed a good fit to the 1:2:1 ratio (χ 2 = 3.230, P
Table 1. Reaction to the Indian biotype of brown planthopper of F 2<br />
progenies derived from IR54741-3-21-22/IR31917-45-3-2.<br />
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 M<br />
Genotype a Phenotype Plants (no.) χ 2 P b<br />
(1:2:1)<br />
RR Resistant 21 0.318 0.50–0.25<br />
RS Segregat<strong>in</strong>g for 56 1.520 0.50–0.25<br />
resistance<br />
SS Susceptible 18 1.392 0.50–0.25<br />
5.9 kb<br />
5.3 kb<br />
a R = resistant, S = susceptible. b Nonsignificant at 1% level and 2 df.<br />
M P 2 RB SB P 1<br />
Fig. 2. Southern hybridization band patterns of doubled-haploid<br />
l<strong>in</strong>es and parents. Genomic DNA was digested with ClaI enzyme<br />
and probed with the cloned 938-bp dig-labeled DNA probe. A 5.3-<br />
kb band <strong>in</strong> Azucena parent (lane 7) and a 5.9-kb band <strong>in</strong> IR64<br />
parent (lane 6). Lanes 3–5 and 1 are plants with IR64 allele and<br />
lane 2 is doubled-haploid plant with Azucena allele. M = molecular<br />
weight marker.<br />
938 bp<br />
to allow the amplification of the marker locus. Under the PCR<br />
conditions described for the SCAR analysis, oligonucleotide<br />
primer pair PR1F/PR1R (F: 5′ ACATCAGCGTCGTTCAAG<br />
3′, R: 5′ CCGAAGGATAAAGCA CAC 3 ) amplified a s<strong>in</strong>gle<br />
band <strong>in</strong> the resistant parent and resistant bulk, <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
dom<strong>in</strong>ant nature of the resistance gene.<br />
The RAPD marker OPA16 938 was located on the RFLP<br />
map us<strong>in</strong>g the DH mapp<strong>in</strong>g population and the MAPMAKER<br />
program (Lander et al 1987). The 938-bp DNA probe had a<br />
segregation of 5.9-kb and 5.3-kb bands at the ClaI site (Fig. 2)<br />
and the results <strong>in</strong>dicated that the RAPD marker was located<br />
on chromosome 11 of rice, along with 22 other DNA markers<br />
assigned to the same chromosome. The marker OPA16 938 was<br />
10.6 cM proximal to RG167 and 14 cM distal from the<br />
microsatellite marker RM209.<br />
The presence or absence of resistance-l<strong>in</strong>ked RAPD<br />
marker OPA16 938 was surveyed with n<strong>in</strong>e semidwarf rice varieties<br />
and four traditional <strong>in</strong>dica rice cultivars. The RAPD<br />
profiles of all these genotypes amplified a 900-bp band, while<br />
Swarnalata amplified the 938-bp band similar to the resistant<br />
parent. The RAPD profiles of n<strong>in</strong>e rice varieties—except<br />
Ptb33, ARC6650, Swarnalata, and T-12—had a susceptibleparent-specific<br />
802-bp band and were susceptible to the Indian<br />
BPH biotype. However, Ptb33, ARC6650, and T-12 had<br />
amplified a 764-bp band, which was not present <strong>in</strong> the susceptible<br />
parent and susceptible varieties. The resistance gene<br />
present <strong>in</strong> these varieties might be nonallelic to the gene present<br />
<strong>in</strong> the resistant breed<strong>in</strong>g l<strong>in</strong>e IR54741-3-21-22 and Swarnalata.<br />
Hence, the DNA marker OPA16 938 could be used <strong>in</strong> MAS for<br />
breed<strong>in</strong>g rice varieties resistant to the Indian biotype of BPH.<br />
Fig. 1. DNA amplification pattern obta<strong>in</strong>ed with random<br />
primer OPA16 <strong>in</strong> bulk segregant analysis. The polymorphic<br />
fragment of 938 bp is <strong>in</strong>dicated by an arrow. M =<br />
marker (X174), P 2 = resistant parent, RB = resistant bulk,<br />
SB = susceptible bulk, P 1 = susceptible parent.<br />
Discussion<br />
RFLP, RAPD, microsatellites, and amplified fragment length<br />
polymorphism have been used to tag genes of agronomic value<br />
<strong>in</strong> several crop species. In our study, we have identified the<br />
marker OPA16 938 us<strong>in</strong>g RAPD and bulk segregant analysis<br />
(Jena et al 1998). The RAPD marker is tightly l<strong>in</strong>ked to the<br />
resistance gene at a distance of 0.52 cM and can be used for<br />
MAS for BPH resistance.<br />
Robust genetic markers were developed through conversion<br />
of polymorphisms identified by PCR-based RAPD and<br />
bulk segregant analysis <strong>in</strong>to SCARs. A specific SCAR marker<br />
has been used to identify rice genotypes carry<strong>in</strong>g a BPH resistance<br />
gene that confers resistance to the Indian biotype of BPH<br />
through MAS. Our results suggest that the resistance gene was<br />
absent <strong>in</strong> most of the rice varieties, which are <strong>in</strong> fact susceptible<br />
to the Indian BPH biotype, except Swarnalata, Ptb33,<br />
and ARC6650. The homology of the 938-bp DNA fragment<br />
between Swarnalata and IR54741-3-21-22 <strong>in</strong>dicated that the<br />
gene Bph-6 <strong>in</strong> Swarnalata (Kabir and Khush 1988) may be the<br />
same as that <strong>in</strong> IR54741-3-21-22 and is designated as Bph-<br />
6(t). The SCAR marker identified <strong>in</strong> this study would be useful<br />
<strong>in</strong> clon<strong>in</strong>g the gene for BPH resistance.<br />
Molecular markers, QTL mapp<strong>in</strong>g, and marker-assisted selection 267
References<br />
Harushima Y, Yano M, Shomura A, Sato M, Shimano T, Kuboki Y,<br />
Yamamoto T, L<strong>in</strong> SY, Antonio BA, Parco A, Kajiya H, Huang<br />
N, Yamamoto K, Nagamura Y, Kurata N, Khush GS, Sasaki<br />
T. 1998. A high-density rice genetic map with 2275 markers<br />
us<strong>in</strong>g a s<strong>in</strong>gle F 2 population. <strong>Genetics</strong> 148:479-494.<br />
Huang N, McCouch S, Mew T, Parco A, Guiderdoni E. 1994. Development<br />
of an RFLP map from a doubled haploid population<br />
<strong>in</strong> rice. <strong>Rice</strong> Genet. Newsl. 11:34-137.<br />
Ishii T, Brar DS, Multani DS, Khush GS. 1994. Molecular tagg<strong>in</strong>g<br />
of genes for brown planthopper resistance and earl<strong>in</strong>ess<br />
<strong>in</strong>trogressed from O. australiensis <strong>in</strong>to cultivated rice, O. sativa.<br />
Genome 37:217-221.<br />
Jena KK, Pasalu IC, Krishnaiah K, Khush GS. 1998. A RAPD marker<br />
for the gene conferr<strong>in</strong>g resistance to Indian biotype of BPH.<br />
<strong>Rice</strong> Genet. Newsl. 15:133-134.<br />
Jeon YH, Ahn SN, Choi HC, Hahn TR, Moon HP. 1999. Identification<br />
of a RAPD marker l<strong>in</strong>ked to a brown planthopper resistance<br />
gene <strong>in</strong> rice. Euphytica 107:23-28.<br />
Kabir MA, Khush GS. 1988. Genetic analysis of resistance of brown<br />
planthopper <strong>in</strong> rice, Oryza sativa L. Plant Breed. 100:54-58.<br />
Khush GS, Brar DS. 1991. <strong>Genetics</strong> of resistance to <strong>in</strong>sects <strong>in</strong> crop<br />
plants. Adv. Agron. 45:223-274.<br />
Kosambi DD. 1944. The estimation of map distances from recomb<strong>in</strong>ation<br />
values. Ann. Eugen. 12:172-175.<br />
Lander ES, Green P, Abrahamson J, Barlow A, Daly MJ, L<strong>in</strong>coln<br />
SE, Newburg AL. 1987. MAPMAKER: an <strong>in</strong>teractive computer<br />
package for construct<strong>in</strong>g primary genetic l<strong>in</strong>kage maps<br />
of experimental and natural populations. Genomics 1:174-181.<br />
Michelmore RW, Paran I, Kesseli RV. 1991. Identification of markers<br />
l<strong>in</strong>ked to disease resistance gene by bulked segregant analysis:<br />
a rapid method to detect markers <strong>in</strong> specific genomic regions<br />
by us<strong>in</strong>g segregat<strong>in</strong>g populations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.<br />
USA 88:9828-9832.<br />
Williams JGK, Kubelik AR, Livak KJ, Rafalski JA, T<strong>in</strong>gey SV. 1990.<br />
DNA polymorphisms amplified by arbitrary primers are useful<br />
as genetic markers. Nucleic Acids Res. 18:6531-6535.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ addresses: K.K Jena and Y. Varalaxmi, Biotechnology Centre,<br />
Mahyco Research Foundation, Hyderabad 00073, India;<br />
I.C. Pasalu, Y. Kondala Rao, K. Krishnaiah, Directorate of<br />
<strong>Rice</strong> Research, Hyderabad 500030, India; G. Kochert, Department<br />
of Botany, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602,<br />
USA; G.S. Khush, <strong>International</strong> <strong>Rice</strong> Research Institute,<br />
DAPO Box 7777, Metro Manila, Philipp<strong>in</strong>es.<br />
Acknowledgment: The f<strong>in</strong>ancial support received from the Mahyco<br />
Research Foundation and the Rockefeller Foundation is gratefully<br />
acknowledged.<br />
Mapp<strong>in</strong>g QTLs for brown planthopper (BPH) resistance<br />
<strong>in</strong>trogressed from Oryza offic<strong>in</strong>alis <strong>in</strong> rice<br />
H. Hirabayashi, R. Kaji, M. Okamoto, T. Ogawa, D.S. Brar, E.R. Angeles, and G.S. Khush<br />
We mapped new genes for resistance to BPH: bph11(t) and bph12(t), derived from O. offic<strong>in</strong>alis on chromosomes 3 and 4,<br />
respectively. QTL analysis was carried out us<strong>in</strong>g RFLP markers to identify the other new genes for resistance to BPH from O.<br />
offic<strong>in</strong>alis. N<strong>in</strong>ety-four recomb<strong>in</strong>ant <strong>in</strong>bred l<strong>in</strong>es (RILs) from the cross between H<strong>in</strong>ohikari (susceptible japonica variety) and<br />
IR54742-1-11-17 (resistant <strong>in</strong>dica l<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong>trogressed from O. offic<strong>in</strong>alis) were used for QTL analysis. QTLs for resistance to BPH<br />
were detected on chromosomes 3, 4, and 12. The QTL located at RFLP marker G1318 on chromosome 3 showed the highest<br />
value of LOD scores, while the other QTLs appeared to represent m<strong>in</strong>or genes for BPH resistance.<br />
Brown planthopper (BPH) is a serious pest <strong>in</strong> many rice-grow<strong>in</strong>g<br />
countries. In Japan, BPH resistance conveyed by the resistance<br />
genes Bph1 and bph2 has broken down. One of our breed<strong>in</strong>g<br />
objectives is to develop BPH-resistant varieties of japonica<br />
rice carry<strong>in</strong>g other effective BPH genes such as bph8 and Bph9<br />
and identify new genes <strong>in</strong>trogressed from wild rice species.<br />
We identified two new resistance genes, bph11(t) and bph12(t)<br />
(Hirabayashi et al 1997, 1998), derived from O. offic<strong>in</strong>alis<br />
and mapped these genes on chromosomes 3 and 4, respectively.<br />
In this study, QTL analysis was carried out to identify<br />
other new genes for resistance to BPH <strong>in</strong>trogressed from O.<br />
offic<strong>in</strong>alis <strong>in</strong>to rice.<br />
Materials and methods<br />
Indica <strong>in</strong>trogression l<strong>in</strong>e IR54742-1-11-17 (IR31917-45-3-2/<br />
O. offic<strong>in</strong>alis//IR31917-45-3-2) with BPH resistance genes<br />
<strong>in</strong>trogressed from O. offic<strong>in</strong>alis was crossed with H<strong>in</strong>ohikari,<br />
a susceptible japonica variety. We tested F 3 l<strong>in</strong>es from the cross<br />
us<strong>in</strong>g a mass screen<strong>in</strong>g procedure with BPH biotype 1. The<br />
segregation for BPH resistance showed that IR54742-1-11-17<br />
carried one or two genes (Table 1). We then developed 94 F 6<br />
recomb<strong>in</strong>ant <strong>in</strong>bred l<strong>in</strong>es (RILs) derived from the F 2 population<br />
of the cross.<br />
Seedl<strong>in</strong>gs were <strong>in</strong>fested at the 1.5-leaf stage with second-<br />
to third-<strong>in</strong>star nymphs of BPH biotype 1 (10 nymphs per<br />
seedl<strong>in</strong>g). We recorded the degree of BPH resistance at about<br />
14 d after <strong>in</strong>festation compared with susceptible and resistant<br />
checks. The RILs were classified and scored from susceptible<br />
268 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
Table 1. Segregation <strong>in</strong> F 3 for BPH resistance from the cross of<br />
japonica cv. H<strong>in</strong>ohikari (susceptible) with alien <strong>in</strong>trogression l<strong>in</strong>e<br />
IR54742-1-11-17 (resistant) derived from O. offic<strong>in</strong>alis.<br />
L<strong>in</strong>es (no.)<br />
RILs (no.)<br />
30<br />
20<br />
10<br />
0<br />
0<br />
α2 test<br />
RR/RS a SS Total Ratio α2 value<br />
1 2 3 4 5<br />
Level of resistance<br />
Probability<br />
121 19 140 3:1 9.7 0.0013) for<br />
BPH resistance were detected on chromosomes 3, 4, and 12.<br />
The located QTL at RFLP marker G1318 on chromosome 3<br />
showed the highest LOD value (5.39). LOD scores of the other<br />
two QTLs near the RFLP marker R288 on chromosome 4 and<br />
near R1709 on chromosome 12 were 4.04 and 3.53, respectively<br />
(Fig. 2).<br />
Hirabayashi et al (1997) identified bph11(t) near G1318.<br />
We will carry out an allele test for BPH resistance between<br />
this QTL and bph11(t) on chromosome 3. The other two QTLs<br />
on chromosomes 4 and 12 appeared to have m<strong>in</strong>or effects for<br />
BPH resistance. Bph3 (G.S. Khush, personal communication)<br />
and bph12(t) (Hirabayashi et al 1998) were located around the<br />
same region as one QTL on chromosome 4, whereas Bph1<br />
(Hirabayashi and Ogawa 1999), bph2 (Murata et al1997), Bph9<br />
(Murata et al 1997), and Bph10(t) (Ishii et al 1994) were located<br />
around the same region as another QTL on chromosome<br />
12. The relationships among these loci need to be studied.<br />
Chr 3<br />
5.39 3.0 LOD 0.0<br />
G1318<br />
R1925<br />
R1927<br />
R1618<br />
4.04<br />
3.0<br />
Chr 4<br />
LOD<br />
0.0<br />
C445<br />
C107<br />
R1427<br />
R514<br />
R1783<br />
R335<br />
R513<br />
R271<br />
R288<br />
G124b<br />
R1854<br />
3.53<br />
3.0<br />
Chr 12<br />
LOD<br />
0.0<br />
C1069<br />
R1709<br />
G2140<br />
C443<br />
R617<br />
R3375<br />
R2672<br />
124a<br />
r642b<br />
g24b<br />
Fig. 2. QTL analysis of brown planthopper resistance <strong>in</strong> H<strong>in</strong>ohikari/IR54742-1-11-17<br />
recomb<strong>in</strong>ant <strong>in</strong>bred l<strong>in</strong>es.<br />
Molecular markers, QTL mapp<strong>in</strong>g, and marker-assisted selection 269
In this study, we estimated that IR54742-1-11-17 has<br />
bph11(t), the BPH resistance gene closely l<strong>in</strong>ked with bph11(t)<br />
and two m<strong>in</strong>or QTLs.<br />
References<br />
Hirabayashi H, Kaji R, Ogawa T, Brar DS, Angeles ER, Khush GS.<br />
1997. Mapp<strong>in</strong>g of new <strong>in</strong>trogression gene for brown<br />
planthopper (BPH) resistance from O. offic<strong>in</strong>alis us<strong>in</strong>g RFLP<br />
markers <strong>in</strong> rice. Proceed<strong>in</strong>g of the 8th SABRAO General Congress<br />
and the Annual Meet<strong>in</strong>g of the Korean Breed<strong>in</strong>g Society.<br />
p 401-402.<br />
Hirabayashi H, Angeles ER, Kaji R, Ogawa T, Brar DS, Khush GS.<br />
1998. Identification of brown planthopper resistance gene<br />
derived from O. offic<strong>in</strong>alis us<strong>in</strong>g molecular markers <strong>in</strong> rice.<br />
Breed. Sci. 48(suppl.):82. (In Japanese.)<br />
Hirabayashi H, Ogawa T. 1999. Identification and utilization of DNA<br />
markers l<strong>in</strong>ked to genes for resistance to brown planthopper<br />
(BPH) <strong>in</strong> rice. Recent Adv. Breed. Sci. 41:71-74. (In Japanese.)<br />
Ishii T, Brar DS, Multani DS, Khush GS. 1994. Molecular tagg<strong>in</strong>g<br />
of genes for brown planthopper resistance and earl<strong>in</strong>ess<br />
<strong>in</strong>trogressed from Oryza australiensis <strong>in</strong>to cultivated rice, O.<br />
sativa. Genome 37:217-221.<br />
Murata K, Nakamura C, Fujiwara M, Kawaguchi M, Mori N, Kaneda<br />
C. 1997. RFLP mapp<strong>in</strong>g of brown planthopper resistance<br />
genes <strong>in</strong> rice. Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs of the 8th SABRAO General Congress<br />
and the Annual Meet<strong>in</strong>g of the Korean Breed<strong>in</strong>g Society.<br />
p 193-194.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ addresses: H. Hirabayashi, R. Kaji, M. Okamoto, Kyushu<br />
National Agricultural Experiment Station, Chikugo, Fukuoka,<br />
833-0041; T. Ogawa, Chugoku National Agricultural Experiment<br />
Station, Fukuyama, Hiroshima, 721-8514 Japan; D.S.<br />
Brar, E.R. Angeles, and G.S. Khush, <strong>International</strong> <strong>Rice</strong> Research<br />
Institute, Los Baños, Laguna, Philipp<strong>in</strong>es.<br />
RFLP mapp<strong>in</strong>g of antibiosis to rice green leafhopper<br />
M. Kadowaki, A. Yoshimura, and H. Yasui<br />
Nephotettix c<strong>in</strong>cticeps Uhler (green rice leafhopper: GRH) is an <strong>in</strong>sect pest <strong>in</strong> temperate Asian rice fields. Three genes for the<br />
antibiosis type of resistance to GRH were identified by restriction fragment length polymorphism mapp<strong>in</strong>g us<strong>in</strong>g near-isogenic<br />
l<strong>in</strong>es (NILs) derived from crosses between susceptible japonica and resistant <strong>in</strong>dica varieties. In the first cross comb<strong>in</strong>ation<br />
between Asom<strong>in</strong>ori and IR24, IR24 and F 1<br />
were found to be highly resistant (more than 80% nymph mortality), but Asom<strong>in</strong>ori<br />
was susceptible (0% mortality). The self-poll<strong>in</strong>ated progeny of the NIL heterozygous for the resistance gene showed 3 resistant:<br />
1 susceptible segregation. A s<strong>in</strong>gle dom<strong>in</strong>ant gene for resistance, which corresponds to Grh1, was mapped on chromosome 5.<br />
In the second cross comb<strong>in</strong>ation between K<strong>in</strong>maze and DV85, DV85 and F 1<br />
were observed to be highly resistant, but K<strong>in</strong>maze<br />
was susceptible. Us<strong>in</strong>g NILs, two dom<strong>in</strong>ant genes for resistance that would correspond to Grh4 and Grh2 were mapped on<br />
chromosomes 3 and 11, respectively.<br />
Nephotettix c<strong>in</strong>cticeps Uhler (green rice leafhopper, GRH) is<br />
one of the most serious <strong>in</strong>sect pests of rice <strong>in</strong> temperate Asia.<br />
GRH is a vector for the transmission of rice stripe and rice<br />
dwarf viruses. The use of genes conferr<strong>in</strong>g resistance to GRH<br />
is an effective way to protect rice plants aga<strong>in</strong>st viral diseases.<br />
To understand the genetics of resistance to GRH of two <strong>in</strong>dica<br />
varieties, IR24 and DV85, quantitative trait loci (QTL) analyses<br />
have been conducted us<strong>in</strong>g two sets of recomb<strong>in</strong>ant <strong>in</strong>bred<br />
l<strong>in</strong>es (RILs). Major QTLs were detected (Yasui and Yoshimura<br />
1999). A QTL on chromosome 5 (qGRH-5) was detected <strong>in</strong><br />
the cross Asom<strong>in</strong>ori/IR24, while two QTLs on chromosomes<br />
3 and 11 (qGRH-3 and qGRH-11) were detected <strong>in</strong> K<strong>in</strong>maze/<br />
DV85. In this study, three QTLs for antibiosis to GRH were<br />
analyzed us<strong>in</strong>g near-isogenic l<strong>in</strong>es (NILs).<br />
Materials and methods<br />
Three sets of NILs, derived from japonica and <strong>in</strong>dica crosses<br />
of Asom<strong>in</strong>ori/IR24 and K<strong>in</strong>maze/DV85, were evaluated for<br />
antibiosis to GRH. As for the NILs developed by cross<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Asom<strong>in</strong>ori with IR24 and backcross<strong>in</strong>g with Asom<strong>in</strong>ori, BC 3 F 3<br />
populations from the BC 3 F 2 plants heterozygous for qGRH-5<br />
were used. For the NILs developed by cross<strong>in</strong>g K<strong>in</strong>maze with<br />
DV85 and backcross<strong>in</strong>g with K<strong>in</strong>maze, two BC 4 F 3 populations<br />
from the BC 4 F 2 plants heterozygous only for qGRH-11<br />
and homozygous for the DV85 allele on qGRH-3 (BC 4 F 3 population<br />
no. 2) and vice versa (BC 4 F 3 population no. 4) were<br />
used.<br />
The GRH population orig<strong>in</strong>ated from adults collected<br />
<strong>in</strong> Kasuya, Fukuoka, Japan, <strong>in</strong> 1991. They were ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed at<br />
25 °C and under 16-h light and 8-h dark conditions. Seedl<strong>in</strong>gs<br />
were <strong>in</strong>fested with 7–10 first- or second-<strong>in</strong>star nymphs. Antibiosis<br />
was scored as nymph mortality 3 d after <strong>in</strong>festation. A<br />
total of 17 restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP)<br />
markers near the three QTLs were used to map genes for resistance<br />
to GRH. QTL analysis for resistance to GRH was conducted<br />
us<strong>in</strong>g MAPMAKER/QTL v1.1.<br />
270 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
N = 144<br />
5S<br />
R569 Grh1 C309 R3313<br />
7.4 0.7 17.8<br />
5L<br />
9.7<br />
21.6<br />
27.6<br />
cM<br />
Fig. 1. L<strong>in</strong>kage map of a gene for resistance<br />
to GRH (Grh1) on chromosome 5.<br />
C189<br />
S723<br />
Grh2<br />
G4001<br />
C50<br />
R2458<br />
N = 45<br />
CEN<br />
1.2 11.6<br />
13.1<br />
cM<br />
11L<br />
G1465<br />
(fixed with K<strong>in</strong>maze)<br />
Fig. 2. L<strong>in</strong>kage map of a gene for resistance<br />
to GRH (Grh2) on chromosome 11.<br />
Number of plants<br />
K<strong>in</strong>maze<br />
60<br />
40<br />
20<br />
0<br />
0 20 40 60 80 100<br />
Nymph mortality (%)<br />
Fig. 3. Frequency distribution for nymph mortality aga<strong>in</strong>st<br />
GRH <strong>in</strong> BC 4 F 3 population no. 4 derived from the cross<br />
between K<strong>in</strong>maze and DV85. Open circles and bars <strong>in</strong>dicate<br />
the mean value and SD of nymph mortality <strong>in</strong><br />
K<strong>in</strong>maze (1.7%) and DV85 (96.0%).<br />
Results and discussion<br />
N = 106<br />
DV85<br />
IR24 and Asom<strong>in</strong>ori showed high and low nymph mortality,<br />
respectively. The BC 3 F 3 population showed 3 (resistant):1 (susceptible)<br />
segregation, <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g that a s<strong>in</strong>gle dom<strong>in</strong>ant gene<br />
controlled resistance. The gene correspond<strong>in</strong>g to Grh1 (Tamura<br />
et al 1999) was mapped on chromosome 5 and located between<br />
RFLP markers R569 and C309 (Fig. 1).<br />
DV85 and K<strong>in</strong>maze showed high and low nymph mortality,<br />
respectively. Between the two BC 4 F 3 populations, 3 (resistant):1<br />
(susceptible) segregation was observed <strong>in</strong> BC 4 F 3 2,<br />
<strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g that a s<strong>in</strong>gle dom<strong>in</strong>ant gene controlled resistance.<br />
The gene correspond<strong>in</strong>g to Grh2 was mapped on chromosome<br />
11 and located between RFLP markers S723 and G1465 (Fig.<br />
2). In the other BC 4 F 3 population (BC 4 F 3 4), cont<strong>in</strong>uous distribution<br />
for nymph mortality from moderate resistance to<br />
strong resistance was observed (Fig. 3). QTL analysis revealed<br />
that qGRH-3 controlled the resistance to GRH <strong>in</strong> BC 4 F 3 4 and<br />
C603<br />
R2170<br />
3S<br />
3L<br />
1.5 3.1 3.0 9.4<br />
cM<br />
Fig. 4. QTL mapp<strong>in</strong>g of a gene for resistance to GRH (qGRH-3) on<br />
chromosome 3.<br />
was located near RFLP marker G144 (Fig. 4). It has been reported<br />
that a pair of dom<strong>in</strong>ant genes with resistance to GRH<br />
with complementary expression were located on chromosomes<br />
3 and 11 (Fukuta et al 1998, Yazawa et al 1998) and designated<br />
as Grh4 and Grh2, respectively. In this study, qGRH-11<br />
was successfully converted to a s<strong>in</strong>gle gene us<strong>in</strong>g a NIL (Fig.<br />
2), but qGRH-3 was not due to moderate resistance <strong>in</strong>fluenced<br />
by Grh2. This revealed that strong resistance was expressed<br />
by Grh4 and Grh2 with complementary action, but plants carry<strong>in</strong>g<br />
only Grh2 showed unstable resistance (Fig. 3).<br />
References<br />
R44<br />
qGRH-3<br />
N = 108<br />
Y3870R<br />
G144<br />
R2982 C2942 C80<br />
Fukuta Y, Tamura K, Hirae M, Oya S. 1998. Genetic analysis of<br />
resistance to green rice leafhopper (Nephotettix c<strong>in</strong>cticeps<br />
Uhler) <strong>in</strong> rice parental l<strong>in</strong>e, Nor<strong>in</strong>-PL6, us<strong>in</strong>g RFLP markers.<br />
Breed. Sci. 48:243-249.<br />
Tamura K, Fukuta Y, Hirae M, Oya S, Ashikawa I, Yagi T. 1999.<br />
Mapp<strong>in</strong>g of Grh1 locus for green rice leafhopper resistance<br />
<strong>in</strong> rice us<strong>in</strong>g RFLP markers. Breed. Sci. 49:11-14.<br />
Yasui H, Yoshimura A. 1999. QTL mapp<strong>in</strong>g of antibiosis to green<br />
leafhopper, Nephotettix virescens Distant, and green rice leafhopper,<br />
Nephotettix c<strong>in</strong>cticeps Uhler, <strong>in</strong> rice, Oryza sativa L.<br />
<strong>Rice</strong> Genet. Newsl. 16:96-98.<br />
Molecular markers, QTL mapp<strong>in</strong>g, and marker-assisted selection 271
Yazawa S, Yasui H, Yoshimura A, Iwata N. 1998. RFLP mapp<strong>in</strong>g of<br />
genes for resistance to green rice leafhopper (Nephotettix<br />
c<strong>in</strong>cticeps Uhler) <strong>in</strong> rice cultivar DV85 us<strong>in</strong>g near-isogenic<br />
l<strong>in</strong>es [<strong>in</strong> Japanese, with English summary]. Sci. Bull. Fac.<br />
Agric. Kyushu Univ. 52:169-175.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ address: Plant Breed<strong>in</strong>g Laboratory, Faculty of Agriculture,<br />
Kyushu University, Fukuoka 812-8581, Japan.<br />
Mapp<strong>in</strong>g of a gene ovicidal to whitebacked planthopper<br />
Sogatella furcifera Horváth <strong>in</strong> rice<br />
M. Yamasaki, A. Yoshimura, and H. Yasui<br />
Whitebacked planthopper (WBPH), Sogatella furcifera Horváth, is a serious <strong>in</strong>sect pest of rice <strong>in</strong> Asia. <strong>Rice</strong> ovicidal response to<br />
WBPH is characterized by formation of watery lesions that result <strong>in</strong> death of the eggs. A gene ovicidal to WBPH was identified<br />
and designated as Ovc. Recomb<strong>in</strong>ant <strong>in</strong>bred l<strong>in</strong>es (RILs) derived from a cross between an ovicidal japonica variety, Asom<strong>in</strong>ori,<br />
and a nonovicidal <strong>in</strong>dica variety, IR24, were used <strong>in</strong> molecular analysis. A total of 15 quantitative trait loci (QTLs) for ovicidal<br />
response were detected on n<strong>in</strong>e different chromosomes. Us<strong>in</strong>g the F 2<br />
population from a near-isogenic l<strong>in</strong>e, which was heterozygous<br />
only for chromosome 6 QTLs, a s<strong>in</strong>gle dom<strong>in</strong>ant gene was identified where the Asom<strong>in</strong>ori allele <strong>in</strong>creased egg mortality.<br />
Ovc was tightly l<strong>in</strong>ked to RFLP marker R1954 on chromosome 6. Ovc was responsible for the formation of watery lesions and<br />
the production of an ovicidal substance, benzyl benzoate. Further genetic analysis revealed three QTLs on chromosomes 1<br />
(qOVA-1) and 5 (qOVA-5-1 and qOVA-5-2). The Asom<strong>in</strong>ori alleles at three QTLs <strong>in</strong>creased egg mortality <strong>in</strong> the presence of Ovc.<br />
Whitebacked planthopper (WBPH), Sogatella furcifera<br />
Horváth, is a serious <strong>in</strong>sect pest of rice <strong>in</strong> Asia. The rice ovicidal<br />
response to WBPH was characterized by formation of<br />
watery lesions (WL) result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the death of eggs at ovipositional<br />
sites (Suzuki et al 1996). It is considered to be a factor<br />
that affects the suppression of WBPH multiplication. In this<br />
study, we detected quantitative trait loci (QTLs) for ovicidal<br />
response and located a major gene.<br />
Materials and methods<br />
Seventy-one recomb<strong>in</strong>ant <strong>in</strong>bred l<strong>in</strong>es (RILs, F 8 , F 9 , and F 10 )<br />
derived from a cross between an ovicidal japonica variety,<br />
Asom<strong>in</strong>ori, and a nonovicidal <strong>in</strong>dica variety, IR24 (Tsunematsu<br />
et al 1996), were used for QTL analysis. Based on a set of<br />
chromosomal segment substitution l<strong>in</strong>es with IR24 genetic<br />
background (Aida et al 1997), near-isogenic l<strong>in</strong>es (NILs) for<br />
the putative QTLs were developed through marker-assisted<br />
selection.<br />
The cultured WBPH population was ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed as described<br />
by Yamasaki et al (1999). <strong>Rice</strong> plants were transplanted<br />
<strong>in</strong> plastic cups and grown <strong>in</strong> a greenhouse. At the maximum<br />
tiller<strong>in</strong>g stage, WBPH females were caged with a s<strong>in</strong>gle plant<br />
for 2 d. The plants were phenotyped for the formation of WL<br />
and egg mortality (EM) 3 d after remov<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>in</strong>sects. The<br />
rice plants with WBPH eggs laid by migrant populations <strong>in</strong><br />
the experimental rice field of Kyushu University were <strong>in</strong>vestigated<br />
to map the QTLs <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g EM. The formation of WL<br />
and EM of WBPH was scored <strong>in</strong>dividually as described by<br />
Yamasaki et al (1999). A bioassay of benzyl benzoate (BB),<br />
an ovicidal substance, was conducted us<strong>in</strong>g a procedure described<br />
by Se<strong>in</strong>o et al (1996).<br />
DNA extraction and restriction fragment length polymorphism<br />
(RFLP) analysis were performed as described by<br />
Tsunematsu et al (1996). QTL and epistasis analyses were<br />
conducted follow<strong>in</strong>g Yamasaki et al (1999) and by us<strong>in</strong>g<br />
MAPMAKER/QTL v1.1 (L<strong>in</strong>coln et al 1993). An LOD score<br />
of 1.5 was used as the threshold for declar<strong>in</strong>g a QTL. The<br />
QTL for EM, which was mapped from the NIL, was designated<br />
us<strong>in</strong>g a comb<strong>in</strong>ation of letters and numbers (i.e., qOVA-<br />
1). The letters “qOV” refer to ovicidal QTL and “A” was derived<br />
from RIA (RILs <strong>in</strong> this study). L<strong>in</strong>kage analysis was performed<br />
with MAPMAKER/EXP 3.0 (Lander et al 1987).<br />
Results<br />
A total of 15 QTLs for ovicidal response to WBPH were detected<br />
(Yamasaki et al 1999). The QTL on the short arm of<br />
chromosome 6 (6S) had the greatest effect for WL and EM.<br />
The rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g 14 QTLs were detected <strong>in</strong> two regions each on<br />
1S, 3S, and 5L (long arm of chromosome 5), and <strong>in</strong> one region<br />
each on 1L, 2S, 2L, 4S, 6L, 8S, 10S, and the centromeric region<br />
of chromosome 12 (12CEN). Alleles from both the parents<br />
contributed to a high value of WL and/or EM. No significant<br />
epistatic <strong>in</strong>teraction was detected (P
No. of <strong>in</strong>dividuals<br />
IR24<br />
30<br />
A<br />
Asom<strong>in</strong>ori<br />
B<br />
6S<br />
N = 86<br />
cM<br />
3.3<br />
XNpb27<br />
S1520<br />
20<br />
10<br />
N = 86<br />
0<br />
0 20 40 60 80 100<br />
WBPH egg mortality (%)<br />
CEN<br />
6L<br />
3.6<br />
6.3<br />
R1954<br />
Ovc<br />
WI<br />
Bb<br />
L688<br />
Fig. 1. Identification of a gene ovicidal<br />
to whitebacked planthopper (WBPH).<br />
(A) Frequency distribution of WBPH<br />
egg mortality <strong>in</strong> the F 2 population. (B)<br />
Location of the gene (Ovc) ovicidal to<br />
WBPH, watery lesion gene (Wl), and<br />
the gene for production of benzyl benzoate<br />
(Bb) on the RFLP l<strong>in</strong>kage map<br />
of chromosome 6. CEN = centromere.<br />
CEN<br />
1S<br />
1L<br />
N = 96<br />
cM<br />
C86<br />
11.4<br />
XNpb113<br />
4.3<br />
XNpb54<br />
4.3<br />
XNpb346<br />
5.9<br />
C112<br />
qOVA-1<br />
CEN<br />
5S<br />
5L<br />
cM<br />
N = 45<br />
4.6<br />
5.8<br />
N = 44<br />
5.2<br />
8.1<br />
XNpb251<br />
R3313<br />
G1458<br />
R2289<br />
C1268<br />
R1553<br />
C128<br />
qOVA-5-1<br />
qOVA-5-2<br />
Fig. 2. Mapp<strong>in</strong>g of ovicidal QTLs<br />
qOVA-1, qOVA-5-1, and qOVA-5-<br />
2. (A) Location of qOVA-1 (LOD =<br />
17.4, R 2 = 60.1%, additive effect<br />
= 5.0, dom<strong>in</strong>ance effect = 4.9)<br />
on RFLP l<strong>in</strong>kage map of chromosome<br />
1. (B) Locations of qOVA-<br />
5-1 (LOD = 7.2, R 2 = 57.7%, additive<br />
effect = 10.1, dom<strong>in</strong>ance<br />
effect = 11.4) and qOVA-5-2 (LOD<br />
= 6.1, R 2 = 46.9%, additive effect<br />
= 7.9, dom<strong>in</strong>ance effect =<br />
7.4) on RFLP l<strong>in</strong>kage map of chromosome<br />
5. CEN = centromere.<br />
was tightly l<strong>in</strong>ked to RFLP marker R1954 on 6S (Fig. 1B).<br />
Ovc also cosegregated with the formation of WL and production<br />
of BB from the results of genetic analysis us<strong>in</strong>g the same<br />
F 2 <strong>in</strong>dividuals for Ovc mapp<strong>in</strong>g. These genes were designated<br />
as Wl (watery lesion gene) and Bb (gene for production of<br />
benzyl benzoate).<br />
EM was <strong>in</strong>vestigated <strong>in</strong> the NILs for putative QTLs.<br />
Asom<strong>in</strong>ori alleles at three QTLs (1L [qOVA-1], 5L-1 [qOVA-<br />
5-1], and 5L-2 [qOVA-5-2]) <strong>in</strong>creased EM with the existence<br />
of Ovc. Three NILs—which were homozygous for Ovc and<br />
heterozygous each for qOVA-1, qOVA-5-1, and qOVA-5-2—<br />
were selected for QTL mapp<strong>in</strong>g. Genetic analysis for EM was<br />
conducted us<strong>in</strong>g three k<strong>in</strong>ds of progenies derived from the selected<br />
plants. All the populations showed cont<strong>in</strong>uous distributions<br />
with<strong>in</strong> the high-EM category. qOVA-1 was located between<br />
XNpb346 and C112 (Fig. 2A). Among two QTLs of<br />
5L, one QTL, qOVA-5-1, was located between XNpb251 and<br />
R3313, and another QTL, qOVA-5-2, was tightly l<strong>in</strong>ked to<br />
C1268 (Fig. 2B).<br />
Our study identified a gene (Ovc) ovicidal to WBPH<br />
and three QTLs <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g the EM of WBPH. The Ovc was<br />
essential for ovicidal response to WBPH and was considered<br />
to be responsible for the formation of WLs and production of<br />
BB. At least three Asom<strong>in</strong>ori alleles at qOVA-1, qOVA-5-1,<br />
and qOVA-5-2 <strong>in</strong>creased EM <strong>in</strong> the presence of Ovc. The three<br />
QTLs with small genetic effect would enhance the function of<br />
Ovc. It was concluded that Asom<strong>in</strong>ori alleles at Ovc and three<br />
QTLs played an important role <strong>in</strong> ovicidal response of rice to<br />
WBPH.<br />
References<br />
Aida Y, Tsunematsu H, Doi K, Yoshimura A. 1997. Development of<br />
a series of <strong>in</strong>trogression l<strong>in</strong>es of japonica <strong>in</strong> the background<br />
of <strong>in</strong>dica rice. <strong>Rice</strong> Genet. Newsl. 14:41-43.<br />
Lander ES, Green P, Abrahamson J, Barlow A, Daly MJ, L<strong>in</strong>coln<br />
SE, Newburg L. 1987. MAPMAKER: an <strong>in</strong>teractive computer<br />
package for construction of primary genetic l<strong>in</strong>kage maps of<br />
experimental and natural populations. Genomics 1:174-181.<br />
L<strong>in</strong>coln SE, Daly MJ, Lander ES. 1993. Mapp<strong>in</strong>g genes controll<strong>in</strong>g<br />
quantitative traits us<strong>in</strong>g MAPMAKER/QTL version 1.1. 2nd<br />
ed. Whitehead Institute Technical Report.<br />
Se<strong>in</strong>o Y, Suzuki Y, Sogawa K. 1996. An ovicidal substance produced<br />
by rice plants <strong>in</strong> response to oviposition by the<br />
whitebacked planthopper, Sogatella furcifera (Horváth)<br />
(Homoptera: Delphacidae). Appl. Entomol. Zool. 31:467-473.<br />
Molecular markers, QTL mapp<strong>in</strong>g, and marker-assisted selection 273
Suzuki Y, Sogawa K, Se<strong>in</strong>o Y. 1996. Ovicidal reaction of rice plants<br />
aga<strong>in</strong>st the whitebacked planthopper, Sogatella furcifera<br />
Horváth (Homoptera: Delphacidae). Appl. Entomol. Zool.<br />
31:111-118.<br />
Tsunematsu H, Yoshimura A, Harushima Y, Nagamura Y, Kurata N,<br />
Yano M, Sasaki T, Iwata N. 1996. RFLP framework map us<strong>in</strong>g<br />
recomb<strong>in</strong>ant <strong>in</strong>bred l<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong> rice. Breed. Sci. 46:279-284.<br />
Yamasaki M, Tsunematsu H, Yoshimura A, Iwata N, Yasui H. 1999.<br />
Quantitative trait locus mapp<strong>in</strong>g of ovicidal response <strong>in</strong> rice<br />
(Oryza sativa L.) aga<strong>in</strong>st whitebacked planthopper (Sogatella<br />
furcifera Horváth). Crop Sci. 39:1178-1183.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ address: Plant Breed<strong>in</strong>g Laboratory, Faculty of Agriculture,<br />
Kyushu University, 6-10-1, Hakozaki, Higashi-ku,<br />
Fukuoka 812-8581, Japan.<br />
Acknowledgments: We are grateful to Drs. K. Sogawa and Y. Suzuki<br />
for provid<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>sects and helpful comments and Mr. Y. Se<strong>in</strong>o<br />
for his guidance <strong>in</strong> the techniques for extraction of benzyl<br />
benzoate and gas chromatography.<br />
Molecular marker association<br />
for yellow stem borer resistance <strong>in</strong> rice<br />
A. Selvi, P.S. Shanmugasundaram, J.A.J. Raja, and S. Mohankumar<br />
Yellow stem borer (YSB) resistance is governed by polygenes. We focused on identify<strong>in</strong>g molecular markers associated with<br />
YSB resistance. RAPD analysis <strong>in</strong> conjunction with bulked segregant analysis identified OPK6 695<br />
as a marker specifically<br />
amplified from the DNA of the resistant parent, progenies, and other resistant cultivars and OPHA5 660<br />
that specifically amplified<br />
<strong>in</strong> the susceptible parent, progenies, and susceptible cultivars. The identified markers showed l<strong>in</strong>kage with YSB resistance.<br />
RM241, located on chromosome 4, was also found to be associated with the trait. Further marker analysis is required to place<br />
more markers closer to the gene(s) for YSB resistance.<br />
Among the <strong>in</strong>sect pests of rice, stem borers are considered to<br />
be most serious, damag<strong>in</strong>g the crop from the seedl<strong>in</strong>g stage to<br />
maturity. Among the five borer species that are of economic<br />
significance <strong>in</strong> Asia, the yellow stem borer (YSB) Scirpophaga<br />
<strong>in</strong>certulas Walker is the most predom<strong>in</strong>ant one, caus<strong>in</strong>g a steady<br />
annual yield loss of 10 million tons. Attempts to study the genetics<br />
of YSB resistance revealed the polygenic nature of the<br />
trait (Kalode et al 1987). The complex nature of the trait and<br />
the <strong>in</strong>herent difficulties <strong>in</strong> screen<strong>in</strong>g have consequently made<br />
breed<strong>in</strong>g for YSB resistance a difficult task and no adequate<br />
results have been obta<strong>in</strong>ed so far. Marker-assisted selection is<br />
especially helpful when the characters studied are polygenic,<br />
a situation particularly common for resistance traits. For YSB<br />
resistance, the detection of major quantitative trait loci could<br />
be of considerable value for breed<strong>in</strong>g programs s<strong>in</strong>ce their <strong>in</strong>corporation<br />
<strong>in</strong> susceptible genotypes would permit a direct<br />
<strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> the resistance level <strong>in</strong> the improved genotypes.<br />
In this study, we attempted to identify molecular markers<br />
l<strong>in</strong>ked to major loci conferr<strong>in</strong>g YSB resistance <strong>in</strong> rice us<strong>in</strong>g<br />
RAPDs and microsatellites.<br />
Materials and methods<br />
Marker analysis was performed on an F 2 population obta<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
from a cross between two rice varieties, W1263 (resistant) and<br />
CO 43 (susceptible). This F 2 population consisted of 90 <strong>in</strong>dividuals<br />
that segregated for YSB resistance. Phenotyp<strong>in</strong>g was<br />
carried out and damage by stem borer was scored at the vegetative<br />
stage as deadhearts and at the reproductive stage as<br />
white ears.<br />
DNA was extracted from young leaves. Marker analysis<br />
was done <strong>in</strong> conjunction with bulked segregant analysis<br />
(Michelmore et al 1991). Ten F 2 <strong>in</strong>dividuals show<strong>in</strong>g extreme<br />
reactions for stem borer resistance and susceptibility were used<br />
to constitute the bulks. The analysis was performed with DNA<br />
of the parents, resistant and susceptible bulks, <strong>in</strong>dividuals compris<strong>in</strong>g<br />
the bulks, and the F 2 mapp<strong>in</strong>g population.<br />
RAPD analysis was performed <strong>in</strong> a 25 µL reaction mixture<br />
conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g 10 mM tris-HCl (pH 8.3), 50 mM potassium<br />
chloride, 1.62 mM magnesium chloride, 0.01% gelat<strong>in</strong>, 5 pmol<br />
of arbitrary primer (Operon Technologies, Alameda, CA), 250<br />
µM each of dNTPs, and 0.75 unit of Taq DNA polymerase<br />
(Bangalore Genei Pvt. Ltd., India). Amplification was performed<br />
us<strong>in</strong>g a Perk<strong>in</strong> Elmer (GENEAMP2400) Thermocycler.<br />
The amplification profile consisted of an <strong>in</strong>itial denaturation<br />
at 95 °C for 5 m<strong>in</strong>, followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 94<br />
°C for 1 m<strong>in</strong>, anneal<strong>in</strong>g at 37 °C for 1 m<strong>in</strong>, and primer extension<br />
at 72 °C for 1 m<strong>in</strong>, followed by a f<strong>in</strong>al extension at 72 °C<br />
for 5 m<strong>in</strong>. The products were analyzed either on 6% polyacrylamide-urea<br />
gel or on 1.5% agarose gel.<br />
Microsatellite analysis was done with 48 microsatellite<br />
primers that were distributed on all 12 chromosomes. Twenty<br />
nanograms of DNA were amplified <strong>in</strong> a 20 µL reaction mixture<br />
conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g 10 mM tris HCl (pH 8.3), 50 mM potassium<br />
chloride, 1.5 mM magnesium chloride, 0.01% gelat<strong>in</strong>, forward<br />
and reverse primers as recommended by the manufacturer (6<br />
µL), 50 µM each of the dNTPs, and 0.3 unit of Taq polymerase.<br />
The products were analyzed on a 6% denatur<strong>in</strong>g polyacrylamide<br />
gel.<br />
274 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
The association of the marker with the trait was assessed<br />
by two-way ANOVA and goodness of fit for marker segregation<br />
us<strong>in</strong>g chi-square analysis of the F 2 population. Map distances<br />
were calculated us<strong>in</strong>g MAPMAKER/Ver 3B (Lander<br />
et al 1987). The markers were ordered <strong>in</strong>to l<strong>in</strong>kage groups<br />
with an LOD score of 3.0 and a maximum distance of 50.0.<br />
Recomb<strong>in</strong>ation factors were converted <strong>in</strong>to centiMorgans (cM)<br />
by apply<strong>in</strong>g the Haldane function.<br />
Frequency distribution (%)<br />
100<br />
90<br />
80<br />
70<br />
60<br />
50<br />
40<br />
30<br />
20<br />
10<br />
White ear frequency<br />
Deadheart frequency<br />
F 1<br />
(deadheart)<br />
0<br />
0 1 3 5 7 9<br />
Damage (grade)<br />
Fig. 1. Reaction to yellow stem borer <strong>in</strong> F 1 and F 2 .<br />
Results and discussion<br />
Phenotypic studies at both the deadheart and white ear stage<br />
revealed that the F 1 s were <strong>in</strong>termediate for resistance to YSB<br />
and <strong>in</strong> the F 2 there was a unimodal distribution for the YSB<br />
reaction (Table 1, Fig. 1), which did not fit to any Mendelian<br />
ratio and cont<strong>in</strong>uous variation <strong>in</strong>dicated polygenic <strong>in</strong>heritance<br />
<strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g a few genes with major effects. The polygenic nature<br />
of the trait was also reported by Kalode et al (1987).<br />
A parental survey with RAPD and microsatellite markers<br />
revealed 36% and 25% polymorphism, respectively, among<br />
the parents. Bulked segregant analysis was performed with the<br />
polymorphic primers on the resistant and susceptible bulks and<br />
primers that produced reproducible polymorphisms between<br />
the bulks were selected (Fig. 2). Seven random primers—<br />
OPG5, OPAH8, OPN11, OPG8, OPN18, OPK6, and OPC1—<br />
were found co-segregat<strong>in</strong>g with the resistant bulk and the parent,<br />
whereas OPAH5, OPC4, OPF7, and OPG8 were amplified<br />
<strong>in</strong> the susceptible bulk and parent. Among the<br />
microsatellite primers, RM241 and RM219 were found to be<br />
segregat<strong>in</strong>g with resistant and susceptible bulks <strong>in</strong> a co-dom<strong>in</strong>ant<br />
fashion. Further analysis of the bulk <strong>in</strong>dividuals with the<br />
above primers identified four RAPD markers—OPK6 695 ,<br />
OPC1 320 , OPAH5 660 , and OPC4 1300 —that segregated with resistance<br />
and susceptibility, respectively (the subscripts <strong>in</strong>dicated<br />
the size of the amplified product). Similarly, among the<br />
two microsatellite markers, RM241 located on chromosome 4<br />
showed complete association with resistant and susceptible<br />
bulk <strong>in</strong>dividuals amplify<strong>in</strong>g a 148-bp fragment <strong>in</strong> resistant <strong>in</strong>-<br />
Primer OPK 6 Primer OPAH 5<br />
Marker<br />
W 1263<br />
Resistant bulk<br />
Susceptible bulk<br />
CO 43<br />
CO 43<br />
Susceptible bulk<br />
Resistant bulk<br />
W 1263<br />
Marker<br />
695 bp<br />
680 bp<br />
Fig. 2. RAPD profile of parents<br />
and bulks.<br />
Molecular markers, QTL mapp<strong>in</strong>g, and marker-assisted selection 275
Table 1. Reaction to yellow stem borer <strong>in</strong> F 1 and<br />
F 2 of rice.<br />
Score F 1 F 2<br />
Deadhearts<br />
White ears<br />
0 – 19 3<br />
1 1 8 4<br />
3 15 29 23<br />
5 21 19 15<br />
7 – 21 19<br />
9 – 93 28<br />
Total 37 189 92<br />
dividuals and a 162-bp fragment <strong>in</strong> the susceptible <strong>in</strong>dividuals.<br />
The pool<strong>in</strong>g of DNA from extreme phenotypic classes allowed<br />
us to rapidly detect markers associated with respective<br />
phenotypes without contam<strong>in</strong>ation of either class.<br />
L<strong>in</strong>kage analysis with the F 2 phenotypic scores and<br />
RAPD and microsatellite data with the MAPMAKER program<br />
revealed that the RAPD markers K6 695 , C1 320 , and AH5 660 were<br />
at a distance of 12.8, 15.2, and 14.9 cM, respectively, from the<br />
gene(s) and the microsatellite marker was 25.3 cM away. The<br />
markers OPK6 695 and OPAH5 660 were used to screen a set of<br />
germplasm and it was seen that OPK6 695 was amplified <strong>in</strong> all<br />
the resistant cultivars, whereas the marker OPAH5 660 was amplified<br />
<strong>in</strong> all the susceptible cultivars, thus confirm<strong>in</strong>g l<strong>in</strong>kage<br />
with the trait.<br />
A survey of microsatellite markers on chromosome 4 is<br />
suggested to establish close l<strong>in</strong>kages with YSB resistance.<br />
References<br />
Kalode MB, Bentur JS, Sr<strong>in</strong>ivasan TE. 1987. Screen<strong>in</strong>g and breed<strong>in</strong>g<br />
rice for stem borer resistance. Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs of the <strong>International</strong><br />
Workshop on Sorghum Stem Borers, 17-20 Nov 1987,<br />
ICRISAT, Patancheru, India. p 153-158.<br />
Lander ES, Green P, Abrahamson J, Barlow A, Daly MJ, L<strong>in</strong>coln<br />
SE, Newburg L. 1987. MAPMAKER: an <strong>in</strong>teractive computer<br />
package for construction of primary genetic l<strong>in</strong>kage maps of<br />
experimental and natural populations. Genomics 1:174-181.<br />
Michelmore RW, Paran I, Kesseli V. 1991. Identification of markers<br />
l<strong>in</strong>ked to disease resistance genes by bulked segregant analysis:<br />
a rapid method to detect markers <strong>in</strong> specific genomic regions<br />
by us<strong>in</strong>g segregat<strong>in</strong>g populations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.<br />
USA 88:9828-9832.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ addresses: A. Selvi, Sugarcane Breed<strong>in</strong>g Institute,<br />
Coimbatore 641007, Tamil Nadu, India; P.S.<br />
Shanmugasundaram and J.A.J. Raja, Centre for Plant Molecular<br />
Biology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore<br />
641003, Tamil Nadu, India; S. Mohankumar, Department of<br />
CSES, Virg<strong>in</strong>ia Tech University, Blacksburg, VA, USA.<br />
Chromosome blocks are <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> adaptive<br />
gene complexes <strong>in</strong> rice landraces<br />
B.V. Ford-Lloyd, P.S. Virk, M.T. Jackson, and H.J. Newbury<br />
The distribution of 122 mapped markers was monitored across 48 diverse landraces of rice. Strong statistical associations<br />
were observed between some pairs of markers across the diverse material. These strongly associated pairs of markers mapped<br />
to the same chromosomes only <strong>in</strong> some cases. The rema<strong>in</strong>der were due to association between markers found on different<br />
chromosomes. Many of these genetically unl<strong>in</strong>ked but strongly associated markers are not randomly distributed across the<br />
genome but occupy two sets of DNA blocks with<strong>in</strong> the rice chromosomes. Analyses have revealed that sets of the same<br />
markers are found <strong>in</strong> association with performance for each of four traits <strong>in</strong> the diverse landrace material and doubled haploid<br />
mapp<strong>in</strong>g population. Hence, associations between markers and traits <strong>in</strong> the diverse material are, as expected, based on<br />
associations between alleles at marker loci and alleles at quantitative trait loci. We propose that our data provide strong<br />
evidence for the coadaptation of geographically dist<strong>in</strong>ct landraces and that this has resulted over time <strong>in</strong> the ma<strong>in</strong>tenance of<br />
“adaptive gene complexes” <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g agronomically important quantitative traits.<br />
We have previously predicted the performance for various<br />
quantitative traits <strong>in</strong> diverse germplasm of rice us<strong>in</strong>g molecular<br />
markers (Virk et al 1996a,b). This is possible because of<br />
the presence of statistical associations between the presence/<br />
absence of <strong>in</strong>dividual markers and trait performance, identifiable<br />
through regression analysis. In our most recent work, we<br />
have <strong>in</strong>vestigated the genetic basis of the observed associations<br />
between markers and QTL loci, and we have identified<br />
features of the rice genome that underlie these associations.<br />
The results shed light upon the evolution of cultivated rice and<br />
raise questions about conventional genetic improvement of rice.<br />
276 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
Materials and methods<br />
A diverse set of 48 landraces of Oryza sativa (from South and<br />
Southeast Asia) along with a mapp<strong>in</strong>g population of 60<br />
doubled-haploid (DH) l<strong>in</strong>es obta<strong>in</strong>ed from a cross between<br />
IR64 and Azucena (Huang et al 1994, Maheswaran et al 1997)<br />
constituted the material for this study (see Virk et al 1996a).<br />
Morphological data for four quantitative traits (culm number,<br />
culm length, panicle length, and days to 50% flower<strong>in</strong>g) were<br />
scored on 10 representative plants of each of the 48 landraces<br />
and 60 DH l<strong>in</strong>es.<br />
The AFLP (amplified fragment length polymorphism)<br />
protocol developed by Vos et al (1995) was essentially followed,<br />
with m<strong>in</strong>or modifications (Virk et al 1998). Fourteen<br />
primer comb<strong>in</strong>ations yield<strong>in</strong>g 122 mapped AFLP markers were<br />
scored on the landraces and DH l<strong>in</strong>es.<br />
To detect associations between the 122 mapped AFLP<br />
markers scored on the landraces, a cont<strong>in</strong>gency chi-square<br />
analysis for all possible pairs (7,381) of markers was conducted.<br />
To m<strong>in</strong>imize the occurrence of false positives, a conservative<br />
test was used <strong>in</strong> which the probability (P) obta<strong>in</strong>ed from the<br />
normal test of significance was multiplied by n – 1 (where n is<br />
the number of markers). The association was declared significant<br />
wherever the adjusted P was less than 0.05.<br />
L<strong>in</strong>ear regression analysis was employed to detect the<br />
association between an AFLP marker and a quantitative trait<br />
for the landraces, where the latter was treated as a dependent<br />
variable and the various AFLP marker genotypes as <strong>in</strong>dependent<br />
variables (Virk et al 1996a,b). The method provides the<br />
maximum likelihood estimates of the relationships between<br />
performance for the quantitative trait and the presence/absence<br />
of particular molecular markers. The maximum r 2 improvement<br />
(MAXR) option of the PROC REG of the SAS statistical<br />
package (SAS 1990) was used to determ<strong>in</strong>e the most appropriate<br />
model.<br />
In the DH mapp<strong>in</strong>g population, the significance of regression<br />
was <strong>in</strong>terpreted to be a result of genetic l<strong>in</strong>kage, as<br />
opposed to statistical or genetic association <strong>in</strong> the landraces.<br />
Results<br />
Initially, we carried out analyses <strong>in</strong> which associations between<br />
different AFLP marker loci were exam<strong>in</strong>ed. All 122 AFLP<br />
markers, which had been mapped us<strong>in</strong>g a DH population (Virk<br />
et al 1998), were scored as present/absent across the 48<br />
landraces. In this diverse material, strong associations were<br />
found between the allelic pattern of some pairs of markers us<strong>in</strong>g<br />
chi-square analysis. Of a total of 7,381 pairs of markers,<br />
960 were found to be strongly associated (P
this may be mislead<strong>in</strong>g; particular markers may have fallen<br />
just outside the threshold significance used <strong>in</strong> the analyses and<br />
therefore are not <strong>in</strong>cluded. It may also be because polymorphism<br />
at a QTL <strong>in</strong> the two parents used <strong>in</strong> the cross has assumed<br />
a much greater significance <strong>in</strong> the mapp<strong>in</strong>g population<br />
than it does across the diverse set of landraces. This could<br />
occur if the effects of other QTLs cannot be detected because,<br />
<strong>in</strong> this cross, these loci are monomorphic.<br />
Conversely, some markers are associated with a trait <strong>in</strong><br />
the diverse material but not associated with that trait <strong>in</strong> the DH<br />
population. This is partly expla<strong>in</strong>ed because some of the QTLs<br />
controll<strong>in</strong>g the traits studied here may not be polymorphic <strong>in</strong><br />
the particular cross used to produce this mapp<strong>in</strong>g population.<br />
Hence, those QTLs, and the markers associated with them,<br />
would not be detected <strong>in</strong> the DH population. However, <strong>in</strong> addition,<br />
because marker alleles on different chromosomes can<br />
rema<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> association across diverse germplasm, a marker on<br />
one chromosome may also be associated with a QTL allele<br />
with<strong>in</strong> an associated block on another chromosome.<br />
How have alleles at loci <strong>in</strong> blocks on different chromosomes<br />
rema<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> association dur<strong>in</strong>g the adaptive evolution<br />
of landraces These blocks may have been ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> association<br />
over the hundreds or thousands of years of rice<br />
landrace cultivation over a geographically wide area. Alternatively,<br />
the associations have been selected several or many times<br />
dur<strong>in</strong>g evolution, perhaps as an adaptive response to similar<br />
environmental conditions. The comb<strong>in</strong>ation of migration and<br />
<strong>in</strong>breed<strong>in</strong>g giv<strong>in</strong>g rise to l<strong>in</strong>kage disequilibrium may have been<br />
significant <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>itial establishment of associations, but cannot<br />
alone account for their occurrence and ma<strong>in</strong>tenance over<br />
time <strong>in</strong> geographically diverse regions of Asia. As with wild<br />
oats and wild barley (Clegg and Allard 1972, Clegg et al 1972),<br />
it would appear that, <strong>in</strong> these rice landraces, epistatic <strong>in</strong>teractions<br />
between alleles at different loci may have contributed to<br />
the associations that we have found <strong>in</strong> this study.<br />
We suggest that association, particularly of genes among<br />
different chromosomal blocks, is the “coadaptation” of<br />
Dobzhansky (1970), who suggested that the b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g together<br />
of favorable allele comb<strong>in</strong>ations could be favored by selection.<br />
Selection, accompanied by recomb<strong>in</strong>ation reduced by one<br />
or all of l<strong>in</strong>kage, <strong>in</strong>breed<strong>in</strong>g, and reduced population size, can<br />
result <strong>in</strong> nonrandom associations among alleles at different loci,<br />
giv<strong>in</strong>g rise to genes selected as coadapted units (Frankl<strong>in</strong> and<br />
Lewont<strong>in</strong> 1970, Allard et al 1972). The major hypothesis derived<br />
from these studies is that, with<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>breed<strong>in</strong>g populations,<br />
it is the <strong>in</strong>teraction between favorable alleles with<strong>in</strong> so-called<br />
gene complexes that gives rise to the similar <strong>in</strong>creased adaptation<br />
of different populations to their local environments.<br />
We have previously argued that the existence of associations<br />
between markers and QTLs that can be identified<br />
among diverse germplasm may have practical significance for<br />
marker-assisted selection and germplasm evaluation (Virk et<br />
al 1996a). However, if these associations have adaptive significance<br />
<strong>in</strong> the history of rice landrace evolution, then perhaps<br />
they also require consideration dur<strong>in</strong>g the process of rice<br />
improvement. Would a deliberate attempt to ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> adaptive<br />
gene complexes <strong>in</strong>tact dur<strong>in</strong>g the recomb<strong>in</strong>ation that takes<br />
place <strong>in</strong> plant breed<strong>in</strong>g po<strong>in</strong>t the way to further means of crop<br />
improvement As we further dissect the rice genome, we will<br />
have a better understand<strong>in</strong>g of how these complexes function.<br />
In any case, their existence demonstrates that breed<strong>in</strong>g for<br />
performance of rice varieties, especially for heterogeneous<br />
environments where adaptation is paramount, must take account<br />
of this important genetic mechanism.<br />
References<br />
Allard RW, Babbel GR, Clegg MT, Kahler AL. 1972. Evidence for<br />
coadaptation <strong>in</strong> Avena barbata. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA<br />
69:3043-3048.<br />
Clegg MT, Allard RW. 1972. Patterns of genetic differentiation <strong>in</strong><br />
the slender wild oat species Avena barbata. Proc. Natl. Acad.<br />
Sci. USA 69:1820-1824.<br />
Clegg MT, Allard RW, Kahler AL. 1972. Is the gene the unit of<br />
selection Evidence from two experimental plant populations.<br />
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 69:2472-2478.<br />
Dobzhansky T. 1970. <strong>Genetics</strong> of the evolutionary process. Columbia,<br />
N.Y. (USA): Columbia University Press. 505 p.<br />
Frankl<strong>in</strong> I, Lewont<strong>in</strong> RC. 1970. Is the gene the unit of selection<br />
<strong>Genetics</strong> 65:707-734.<br />
Huang N, McCouch SR, Mew T, Parco A, Guiderdoni E. 1994. Development<br />
of a RFLP map from a DH population of rice. <strong>Rice</strong><br />
Genet. Newsl. 11:134-137.<br />
Maheswaran M, Subudhi PK, Nandi S, Xu JC, Parco A, Yang DC,<br />
Huang N. 1997. Polymorphism, distribution, and segregation<br />
of AFLP markers <strong>in</strong> a DH rice population. Theor. Appl. Genet.<br />
94:39-45.<br />
SAS. 1990. SAS/STAT user’s guide. Version 6, 4th ed. Vol. 1. Cary,<br />
N.C. (USA): SAS Institute Inc.<br />
Virk P, Ford-Lloyd BV, Jackson MT, Newbury HJ. 1996a. Predict<strong>in</strong>g<br />
quantitative variation with<strong>in</strong> rice germplasm us<strong>in</strong>g molecular<br />
markers. Heredity 76:296-304.<br />
Virk PS, Ford-Lloyd BV, Jackson MT, Pooni HS, Clemeno TP,<br />
Newbury HJ. 1996b. Marker-assisted prediction of agronomic<br />
traits us<strong>in</strong>g diverse rice germplasm. In: Khush GS, editor. <strong>Rice</strong><br />
genetics III. Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs of the Third <strong>International</strong> <strong>Rice</strong> <strong>Genetics</strong><br />
Symposium. Manila (Philipp<strong>in</strong>es): <strong>International</strong> <strong>Rice</strong><br />
Research Institute p 307-316.<br />
Virk PS, Ford-Lloyd BV, Newbury HJ. 1998. Mapp<strong>in</strong>g AFLP markers<br />
associated with subspecific differentiation of Oryza sativa<br />
and an <strong>in</strong>vestigation of segregation distortion. Heredity<br />
81:613-620.<br />
Vos P, Hogers R, Sleeker M, Reijans M, Lee T, Homes M, Freiters<br />
A, Pot J, Peleman J, Kuiper M, Zabeau M. 1995. AFLP: a<br />
new concept for DNA f<strong>in</strong>gerpr<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g. Nucl. Acids Res.<br />
23:4407-4414.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ addresses: B.V. Ford-Lloyd and H.J. Newbury, School of<br />
Biosciences, University of Birm<strong>in</strong>gham, Edgbaston, Birm<strong>in</strong>gham<br />
B15 2TT, UK; P.S. Virk and M.T. Jackson, <strong>International</strong><br />
<strong>Rice</strong> Research Institute, Los Baños, Laguna, Philipp<strong>in</strong>es.<br />
278 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
Drought tolerance <strong>in</strong> rice: QTLs, marker-assisted selection,<br />
and environmental <strong>in</strong>teractions<br />
A. Price<br />
A mapp<strong>in</strong>g population of 205 recomb<strong>in</strong>ant <strong>in</strong>bred l<strong>in</strong>es based on a cross between two drought-tolerant upland rice varieties,<br />
Bala and Azucena, was used to identify quantitative trait loci (QTLs) for drought-related traits (root morphology) and field<br />
performance under drought. A root growth study <strong>in</strong>cluded two types of soil-filled conta<strong>in</strong>ers and hydroponics <strong>in</strong> addition to root<br />
penetration assessment us<strong>in</strong>g the wax layer method. Drought screen<strong>in</strong>g was conducted over two seasons <strong>in</strong> the field at both<br />
<strong>IRRI</strong> and WARDA. By us<strong>in</strong>g multiple environments and by compar<strong>in</strong>g with other experiments conducted on other populations,<br />
some potentially valuable QTLs have been identified. Four of these regions are now be<strong>in</strong>g used to improve the Indian upland<br />
variety Kal<strong>in</strong>ga III. A total of n<strong>in</strong>e QTLs are be<strong>in</strong>g developed <strong>in</strong>to near-isogenic l<strong>in</strong>es to further <strong>in</strong>vestigate the nature of the QTLs.<br />
Identify<strong>in</strong>g rice varieties with genes that contribute to drought<br />
tolerance and locat<strong>in</strong>g such genes on molecular l<strong>in</strong>kage maps<br />
offer a new and more precise way to produce drought-tolerant<br />
rice varieties via marker-assisted selection. Locat<strong>in</strong>g such genes<br />
is difficult because drought is a complex phenomenon, rice<br />
germplasm has many mechanisms of tolerance for drought,<br />
and each mechanism is generally multigenic. Much progress<br />
has been made us<strong>in</strong>g several mapp<strong>in</strong>g populations that have<br />
been screened for performance under drought <strong>in</strong> the field or<br />
for <strong>in</strong>dividual traits related to drought tolerance (particularly<br />
root morphology) <strong>in</strong> controlled-environment experiments.<br />
While this research highlights the degree of <strong>in</strong>teraction between<br />
genotype and environment and the complex nature of<br />
the genetics of drought tolerance, a pattern is beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g to<br />
emerge that should be very useful for breeders. We describe<br />
progress <strong>in</strong> identify<strong>in</strong>g quantitative trait loci (QTLs) for<br />
drought-tolerance mechanisms <strong>in</strong> a population of recomb<strong>in</strong>ant<br />
<strong>in</strong>bred l<strong>in</strong>es based on a cross of Bala and Azucena. We also<br />
describe progress <strong>in</strong> marker-assisted selection (MAS) and the<br />
development of near-isogenic l<strong>in</strong>es (NILs) at particularly <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g<br />
QTLs.<br />
Screen<strong>in</strong>g of Bala × Azucena population<br />
A cross between drought-tolerant varieties Bala and Azucena<br />
produced an F 2 mapp<strong>in</strong>g population, which was used to identify<br />
QTLs for root morphology of plants grown <strong>in</strong> a hydroponic<br />
system (Price et al 1997, Price and Tomos 1997). This<br />
was subsequently developed <strong>in</strong>to an F 6 recomb<strong>in</strong>ant <strong>in</strong>bred<br />
population of 205 l<strong>in</strong>es by s<strong>in</strong>gle-seed descent and used to<br />
identify QTLs for root-penetration ability with the wax layer<br />
approach (Price et al 2000). The population has also been<br />
screened for root growth us<strong>in</strong>g three different methods. A large<br />
root box (2 m long × 1 m wide × 1 m deep) conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g 170<br />
plants with each root system restricted to 7-cm-diam nylon<br />
tubes was used to assess root growth <strong>in</strong> well-watered and<br />
droughted conditions (Price et al 1999). The population has<br />
been screened <strong>in</strong> th<strong>in</strong> sections of soil between glass (1.5 cm<br />
thick × 30 cm wide × 120 cm deep) aga<strong>in</strong> under well-watered<br />
and droughted conditions (Price et al 1999, Price et al, unpublished).<br />
The population has also been screened <strong>in</strong> hydroponics<br />
us<strong>in</strong>g the same methodology previously described by Price et<br />
al (1997), only with a lower light <strong>in</strong>tensity (300 mol m –2 s –1 )<br />
(Price et al, unpublished). Figure 1 summarizes some of the<br />
results of mapp<strong>in</strong>g the QTLs associated with root morphology<br />
from these screens. The figure shows that many genomic regions<br />
contribute to root growth under different conditions, but<br />
some regions, such as C601 on chromosome 2 and G1085 on<br />
chromosome 9, consistently affect root<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
Marker-assisted selection and near-isogenic l<strong>in</strong>e development<br />
As a result of these analyses, n<strong>in</strong>e genomic regions were selected<br />
for detailed <strong>in</strong>vestigation (Table 1). For each region,<br />
evidence for an effect on either root growth or performance<br />
under drought is presented, and this <strong>in</strong>cludes corroboration<br />
from other populations. Four of the regions represent Azucena<br />
alleles, which <strong>in</strong>crease the length or thickness of the root<strong>in</strong>g<br />
system. These regions are be<strong>in</strong>g transferred <strong>in</strong>to a popular Indian<br />
upland variety, Kal<strong>in</strong>ga III, which is drought-susceptible<br />
and has poor roots. All n<strong>in</strong>e regions are be<strong>in</strong>g used to produce<br />
NILs—l<strong>in</strong>es that are genetically identical except at the QTL<br />
of <strong>in</strong>terest, where one l<strong>in</strong>e will have the Bala QTL allele and<br />
the other the Azucena QTL allele. This is be<strong>in</strong>g achieved by<br />
exploit<strong>in</strong>g the residual heterozygosity <strong>in</strong> the F 6 population.<br />
These NILs will be used to explore the physiological basis of<br />
the QTLs and may be useful <strong>in</strong> f<strong>in</strong>e mapp<strong>in</strong>g or isolat<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
responsible genes.<br />
References<br />
Champoux MC, Wang G, Sarkarung S, Mackill DJ, O’Toole JC,<br />
Huang N, McCouch SR. 1995. Locat<strong>in</strong>g genes associated with<br />
root morphology and drought avoidance <strong>in</strong> rice via l<strong>in</strong>kage to<br />
molecular markers. Theor. Appl. Genet. 90:969-981.<br />
Courtois B, McLaren G, S<strong>in</strong>ha PK, Prasad K, Yadav R, Shen L.<br />
2000. Mapp<strong>in</strong>g QTLs associated with drought avoidance <strong>in</strong><br />
upland rice. Mol. Breed. 6:55-66.<br />
Molecular markers, QTL mapp<strong>in</strong>g, and marker-assisted selection 279
1<br />
RG532<br />
RG173<br />
RZ995<br />
C178<br />
R2635<br />
54 cM<br />
C1370<br />
G393<br />
R2417<br />
51 cM<br />
C86<br />
C949<br />
RZ14<br />
R117<br />
7<br />
G338<br />
C39<br />
R1440<br />
G20<br />
C451<br />
R1357<br />
RG850<br />
C507<br />
RG351<br />
2 RG509<br />
RG83<br />
RG171<br />
G45<br />
G39/RG139<br />
G57<br />
C601<br />
RG256<br />
100 cM<br />
8<br />
R902<br />
G1010<br />
C225<br />
G2132<br />
G1073<br />
G187<br />
R2676<br />
R202<br />
RG598<br />
R662<br />
3<br />
C643<br />
RG409<br />
RG191<br />
RG745<br />
G144<br />
RZ474<br />
C136<br />
9<br />
R1164<br />
R1687<br />
R79<br />
G385<br />
G1085<br />
C506<br />
4<br />
RG620<br />
RG190<br />
C734<br />
RG449<br />
C513<br />
RG163<br />
10<br />
C701<br />
G89d<br />
RG257<br />
G1082<br />
C16<br />
C223<br />
5 RZ390<br />
R3166<br />
6<br />
C76<br />
RZ516<br />
R2232<br />
R569<br />
RG213<br />
RG13<br />
51 cM<br />
C624<br />
C43<br />
RZ70<br />
R2654<br />
54 cM<br />
RG119<br />
RG346<br />
RG778<br />
RZ682<br />
Root Max. root Root-penetration<br />
thickness length ability<br />
TCC RBC TCC RBC<br />
TCD RBD TCD RBD<br />
Hydro. Hydro.<br />
11 R642<br />
RZ141<br />
12<br />
G24<br />
CD0127<br />
G124<br />
G320<br />
G44<br />
RG2<br />
C189<br />
G1465<br />
48 cM<br />
R617<br />
RG341<br />
R1933<br />
C449<br />
RG543<br />
RG181/C901<br />
Fig. 1. RFLP and AFLP map of Bala × Azucena population (RFLPs <strong>in</strong>dicated to the right of each<br />
chromosome) show<strong>in</strong>g QTLs for two morphological traits (root thickness and root length). These<br />
traits were assessed <strong>in</strong> th<strong>in</strong> chambers under control (TCC) and drought (TCD) conditions and <strong>in</strong><br />
root boxes under control (RBC) and drought (RBD) conditions or hydroponics (Hydro.). In each<br />
case, the LOD score was greater than 3.0; the box represents the 1 LOD confidence <strong>in</strong>terval.<br />
Also presented are QTLs for root-penetration ability (Price et al 2000). QTLs on the right side of<br />
the chromosome represent the positive effect of Azucena alleles. Chromosome segments shaded<br />
black represent targets for marker-assisted selection; those hatched are targets for near-isogenic<br />
l<strong>in</strong>e production.<br />
280 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
Table 1. QTLs associated with root growth or performance under drought <strong>in</strong> Bala × Azucena population.<br />
Between Donor of Target<br />
Chromosome markers positive for MAS QTL effect (and evidence) a<br />
alleles or NIL<br />
1 C86-RZ14- Bala NIL Performance under drought (f)<br />
R117<br />
2 RG171- Bala NIL Root thickness (a), root penetration (b), root-<br />
G45-G39<br />
pull<strong>in</strong>g force (n)<br />
2 G57-C601- Azucena MAS + Root length (a, d), root thickness (c, n), root<br />
RG256 NIL penetration (b, l), performance under drought<br />
(f, i)<br />
3 RZ474-C136- Bala NIL Performance under drought (f), leaf ABA<br />
R1618<br />
accumulation (m)<br />
5 RG13-C624- Bala NIL Root thickness (a, c, g), root length (a, c), root<br />
C43<br />
volume (h), root penetration (b), performance<br />
under drought (f, i)<br />
6 R2654-RG778- Azucena NIL Root thickness (c, d), root length (a), root penetra-<br />
RZ682<br />
tion (l), root<strong>in</strong>g depth (n)<br />
7 R1357-RG650 Azucena MAS + NIL Root length (d), root thickness (d, g), root penetra-<br />
-C507 tion (j), root<strong>in</strong>g depth (g, n)<br />
9 G385-G1085 Azucena MAS + NIL Root length (d, g, k), root thickness (d, k),<br />
performance under drought (f, i, k)<br />
11 RG2-C189- Azucena MAS + NIL Root length (a, k), root penetration (b, k), root<br />
G1465<br />
pull<strong>in</strong>g force (n)<br />
a a = Bala × Azucena F 2 hydroponics (Price and Tomos 1997), b = Bala × Azucena F 6 root-penetration screen (Price et al 2000),<br />
c = Bala × Azucena F 6 hydroponics (unpubl.), d = Bala × Azucena F 6 th<strong>in</strong> chamber screen (Price et al 1999 and unpubl.), e = Bala<br />
× Azucena F 6 root box screen (Price et al 1999), f = Bala × Azucena F 6 field drought screen (Price et al 1999 and unpubl.), g =<br />
Azucena × IR64 DH root tube screen (Yadav et al 1997), h = Azucena × IR64 DH field root growth screen (Hemamal<strong>in</strong>i et al 2000),<br />
i = Azucena × IR64 DH field drought screen (Courtois et al 2000), j = Azucena × IR64 DH root penetration screen (Zheng et al<br />
2000), k = Co39 × Moroberekan F 8 root tube and field drought screen (Champoux et al 1995), l = Co39 × Moroberekan F 8 rootpenetration<br />
screen (Ray et al 1996), m = IR20 × 63-83 F 2 drought screen (Quarrie et al 1997), n = CT9993-5-10-1-M ×<br />
IR62266-42-6-2 DH field drought screen (Zhang et al 1999).<br />
Hemamal<strong>in</strong>i GS, Shashidar HE, Hittalmani S. 2000. Molecular<br />
marker-assisted tagg<strong>in</strong>g of morphological and physiological<br />
traits under two contrast<strong>in</strong>g moisture regimes at peak vegetative<br />
stage <strong>in</strong> rice (Oryza sativa L.). Euphytica 112:69-78.<br />
Price A, Steele K, Townend J, Gorham G, Audebert A, Jones M,<br />
Courtois B. 1999. Mapp<strong>in</strong>g root and shoot traits <strong>in</strong> rice: experience<br />
<strong>in</strong> UK, <strong>IRRI</strong>, and WARDA. In: Ito O, O’Toole J,<br />
Hardy B, editors. Genetic improvement of rice for water-limited<br />
environments. Manila (Philipp<strong>in</strong>es): <strong>International</strong> <strong>Rice</strong><br />
Research Institute. p 257-273.<br />
Price AH, Steele KA, Moore BJ, Barraclough PB, Clark LJ. 2000. A<br />
comb<strong>in</strong>ed RFLP and AFLP l<strong>in</strong>kage map of upland rice (Oryza<br />
sativa L.) used to identify QTLs for root-penetration ability.<br />
Theor. Appl. Genet. 100:49-56.<br />
Price AH, Tomos AD. 1997. Genetic dissection of root growth <strong>in</strong><br />
rice (Oryza sativa L.). II. Mapp<strong>in</strong>g quantitative trait loci us<strong>in</strong>g<br />
molecular markers. Theor. Appl. Genet. 95:143-152.<br />
Price AH, Virk DS, Tomos AD. 1997. Genetic dissection of root<br />
growth <strong>in</strong> rice (Oryza sativa L.). I. A hydroponic screen. Theor.<br />
Appl. Genet. 95:132-142.<br />
Quarrie SA, Laurie DA, Zhu J, Lebreton C, Semikhodskii A, Steed<br />
A, Witsenboer H, Calestani C. 1997. QTL analysis to study<br />
the association between leaf size and abscisic acid accumulation<br />
<strong>in</strong> droughted rice leaves and comparisons across cereals.<br />
Plant Mol. Biol. 35:155-165.<br />
Ray JD, Yu L, McCouch SR, Champoux MC, Wang G, Nguyen H.<br />
1996. Mapp<strong>in</strong>g quantitative trait loci associated with root<br />
penetration ability <strong>in</strong> rice (Oryza sativa L.). Theor. Appl.<br />
Genet. 92:627-636.<br />
Yadav R, Courtois B, Huang N, McLaren G. 1997. Mapp<strong>in</strong>g genes<br />
controll<strong>in</strong>g root morphology and root distribution on a doublehaploid<br />
population of rice. Theor. Appl. Genet. 94:619-632.<br />
Zhang J, Babu RC, Pantuwan G, Kamoshita A, Blum A, Sarkarung<br />
S, O’Toole JC, Nguyen HT. 1999. Molecular dissection of<br />
drought tolerance <strong>in</strong> rice: from physio-morphological traits to<br />
field performance. In: Ito O, O’Toole J, Hardy B, editors.<br />
Genetic improvement of rice for water-limited environments.<br />
Manila (Philipp<strong>in</strong>es): <strong>International</strong> <strong>Rice</strong> Research Institute.<br />
p 331-343.<br />
Zheng H, Babu R, Pathan M, Ali L, Huang N, Courtois B, Nguyen<br />
HT. 2000. Quantitative trait loci for root-penetration ability<br />
and root thickness <strong>in</strong> rice: comparison of genetic backgrounds.<br />
Genome 43:53-61.<br />
Notes<br />
Author’s address: Department of Plant and Soil Science, University<br />
of Aberdeen, AB24 3UU, U.K.<br />
Acknowledgments: The author acknowledges the great contribution<br />
to this rice mapp<strong>in</strong>g project of many <strong>in</strong>dividuals who are or<br />
who will be co-authors <strong>in</strong> other more detailed publications.<br />
The research described has largely been funded by the Department<br />
for <strong>International</strong> Development, U.K.<br />
Molecular markers, QTL mapp<strong>in</strong>g, and marker-assisted selection 281
Identify<strong>in</strong>g traits and molecular markers associated<br />
with components of drought tolerance <strong>in</strong> rice<br />
H.E. Shashidhar, N. Sharma, M. Ashoka, V. Rao, M. Toorchi, and S. Hittalmani<br />
Bulk segregant analysis (BSA) for maximum root length (8–10 genotypes from each, deep-rooted and shallow-rooted phenotypes)<br />
was carried out us<strong>in</strong>g RAPD primers on transgressant doubled-haploid l<strong>in</strong>es of an IR64/Azucena mapp<strong>in</strong>g population.<br />
One random primer-derived band out of 150 tested was found to cosegregate with maximum root length. This primer was found<br />
to be codom<strong>in</strong>ant and mapped onto chromosome 10. The primer mapped with an LOD of 4.2 and accounted for 24% of the<br />
variability for the trait. This was the first report of a primer for maximum root length across crops.<br />
The efficiency of marker-assisted selection (MAS) depends<br />
on the speed and accuracy with which the desirable gene/genotype/allele<br />
can be identified from germplasm accessions or<br />
among recomb<strong>in</strong>ants <strong>in</strong> breed<strong>in</strong>g programs. The availability<br />
of <strong>in</strong>numerable DNA markers and faster and cheaper polymerase<br />
cha<strong>in</strong> reaction (PCR) techniques coupled with the availability<br />
of computer software for visualiz<strong>in</strong>g genomes allow us<br />
to genotype successive generations of breed<strong>in</strong>g material.<br />
The simplicity of the MAS strategy depends on the <strong>in</strong>heritance<br />
pattern of the trait of <strong>in</strong>terest, with the complexity<br />
<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g proportionately with the number of gene pairs “controll<strong>in</strong>g/<strong>in</strong>fluenc<strong>in</strong>g”<br />
the trait(s). Low heritability of the trait<br />
complicates the task further. An array of markers, each identify<strong>in</strong>g<br />
one locus, may have to be assembled to account for a<br />
large percentage of the variation for such a trait. PCR-based<br />
markers are ideal for such tasks s<strong>in</strong>ce they are easy to use, fast,<br />
and reliable, and use a comparatively small amount of DNA.<br />
Drought tolerance is a cumulative effect of several morphological,<br />
phenological, biochemical, and physiological traits<br />
each <strong>in</strong>dividually and collectively <strong>in</strong>teract<strong>in</strong>g with the environment.<br />
It is desirable to select for the <strong>in</strong>dividual component<br />
trait (primary trait) and also evaluate the effect(s) on the whole<br />
plant and crop community levels. O’Toole (1989) said that<br />
“marker-assisted selection holds immediate and near-term use”<br />
<strong>in</strong> breed<strong>in</strong>g for drought tolerance.<br />
As a run-up to our effort to study and quantify drought<br />
tolerance, we tagged root morphological traits under contrast<strong>in</strong>g<br />
moisture regimes (Hemamal<strong>in</strong>i et al 2000). In a subsequent<br />
study, we tried to ascerta<strong>in</strong> the association of root morphology<br />
with gra<strong>in</strong> yield under contrast<strong>in</strong>g moisture regimes. In this<br />
study, transgressants for maximum root length (MRL) were<br />
used to identify PCR-based markers associated with MRL. This<br />
is the first report of markers associated with MRL across crops.<br />
Materials and methods<br />
Transgressants for MRL were identified based on evaluation<br />
of doubled-haploid (DH) l<strong>in</strong>es of an IR64/Azucena mapp<strong>in</strong>g<br />
population under well-watered and low-moisture-stress conditions.<br />
Phenotyp<strong>in</strong>g for root morphology was done follow<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Hemamal<strong>in</strong>i et al (2000). Ten DH l<strong>in</strong>es from shallow and deeprooted<br />
extremes were chosen to constitute the <strong>in</strong>dividual bulks.<br />
Table 1 presents the MRL values of the selected accessions<br />
and parents chosen for the study.<br />
Genomic DNA was extracted from 20–30-d-old leaves<br />
of the selected transgressants—Azucena, IR64, and standard<br />
checks—by the CTAB method. An equal quantity of DNA from<br />
each genotype was used to construct DR (deep-rooted) and<br />
SR (short-rooted) bulks. These two bulks were used to identify<br />
markers associated with MRL adopt<strong>in</strong>g BSA (Williams et<br />
al 1990, Michelmore et al 1991).<br />
The PCR reaction mixture conta<strong>in</strong>ed approximately 100<br />
ng of genomic DNA, 200 mM of dNTPs, 0.2 mM of primer,<br />
10X polymerase buffer, and 1 unit of Taq (MJ Research, USA)<br />
with m<strong>in</strong>eral oil overlay. Random primers were procured from<br />
Operon (Operon Technologies, USA) and run on a PTC100<br />
Thermal Cycler (MJ Research, USA). The PCR profile was<br />
94 °C for 5 m<strong>in</strong>, followed by 35 cycles of 94 °C for 1 m<strong>in</strong>,<br />
44 °C for 1 m<strong>in</strong>, 72 °C for 1 m<strong>in</strong>, and, f<strong>in</strong>ally, 5 m<strong>in</strong> at 72 °C as<br />
an extension. Bands were visualized by runn<strong>in</strong>g on 1.4% agarose<br />
gel sta<strong>in</strong>ed with ethidium bromide.<br />
Random primers were screened for polymorphism. Putative<br />
polymorphic primers were reconfirmed for polymorphism.<br />
RAPD primers show<strong>in</strong>g polymorphism <strong>in</strong> the bulks were<br />
screened across the 135 DH l<strong>in</strong>es for mapp<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
The data generated by us<strong>in</strong>g the BH14 primer on all 135<br />
genotypes of the DH mapp<strong>in</strong>g population were subjected to<br />
Table 1. The MRL values (<strong>in</strong> cm) of the selected accessions and<br />
parents chosen for study.<br />
Deep root<br />
Shallow root<br />
SI No. Genotype Root length SI No. Genotype Root length<br />
1 Azucena 87.37 1 IR64 32.80<br />
2 P7 54.65 2 P467 28.45<br />
3 P107 68.98 3 P78 31.53<br />
4 P333 72.63 4 P463 21.43<br />
5 P192 65.50 5 P35 27.03<br />
6 P210 64.47 6 P284 29.87<br />
7 P12 56.35 7 P488 32.10<br />
8 P391 56.35 8 P442 22.67<br />
9 P1564 54.55 9 P124 28.20<br />
282 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
M<br />
IR64<br />
AZU<br />
–<br />
+<br />
7<br />
107<br />
333<br />
192<br />
210<br />
12<br />
391<br />
1564<br />
467<br />
78<br />
463<br />
35<br />
284<br />
488<br />
442<br />
124<br />
–<br />
+<br />
M<br />
OPBH14<br />
G1084<br />
OSDIM<br />
RG241<br />
RZ625<br />
Fig.1. OPBH14-derived band<strong>in</strong>g pattern <strong>in</strong> parents of mapp<strong>in</strong>g population, deeprooted<br />
bulk, shallow-rooted bulk, and constituents of the bulks.<br />
Fig. 2. L<strong>in</strong>kage map of<br />
chromosome 10<br />
show<strong>in</strong>g the region<br />
near the OPBH14 locus.<br />
MAPMAKER to identify the location of loci on the map <strong>in</strong><br />
relation to the 175 markers already mapped on the genome.<br />
Results and discussion<br />
A standard approach followed to identify markers associated<br />
with traits under monogenic control has been to compare the<br />
band<strong>in</strong>g pattern between phenotypically contrast<strong>in</strong>g plants/<br />
genotypes. This strategy is also very useful <strong>in</strong> tagg<strong>in</strong>g QTLs.<br />
One hundred fifty random primers were used to f<strong>in</strong>d the polymorphism<br />
between the two bulks. Polymorphism between SR<br />
and DR was consistent with OPBH14 (5′ACCGTGGGTG 3′):<br />
a 1.5-kb band was associated with the DR bulk and its <strong>in</strong>gredient<br />
genotypes, and a 1.3-kb band with the SR bulk and its <strong>in</strong>gredient<br />
genotypes (Fig. 1). The primer polymorphism was<br />
codom<strong>in</strong>ant.<br />
The primer mapped to chromosome 10 <strong>in</strong> the vic<strong>in</strong>ity of<br />
the G1084 region, with an LOD threshold of 4. This accounted<br />
for 24.0% of the variation for MRL.<br />
The region flanked by G1084 and RG214 on the distal<br />
portion of chromosome 10 was assessed with polymorphism<br />
of OPBH14 (Fig. 2). Earlier studies have <strong>in</strong>dicated the map<br />
location (Tao et al 1997) of OSDIM, a cell-length mutant called<br />
Dimunito, at this locus. S<strong>in</strong>ce cell-length <strong>in</strong>crease could be an<br />
important factor contribut<strong>in</strong>g to an <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> root length, the<br />
mode of action of this locus could be hypothesized.<br />
The band is be<strong>in</strong>g cloned for sequenc<strong>in</strong>g and development<br />
of a SCAR marker.<br />
References<br />
Hemamal<strong>in</strong>i GS, Shashidhar HE, Hittalmani S. 2000. Molecular<br />
marker assisted tagg<strong>in</strong>g of root morphological traits under two<br />
contrast<strong>in</strong>g moisture regimes at peak vegetative stage <strong>in</strong> rice<br />
(Oryza sativa L.). Euphytica 112:69-78.<br />
Michelmore R, Paran I, Kesseli R. 1991. Identification of markers<br />
l<strong>in</strong>ked to disease-resistance genes by bulk segregant analysis:<br />
a rapid method to detect markers <strong>in</strong> specific genomic regions<br />
by us<strong>in</strong>g segregat<strong>in</strong>g populations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA<br />
88:9828-9832.<br />
O’Toole JC. 1989. Breed<strong>in</strong>g for drought resistance <strong>in</strong> cereals. In:<br />
Baker FWG, editor. Drought resistance <strong>in</strong> cereals. Wall<strong>in</strong>gford<br />
(UK): CAB <strong>International</strong>. p 107-116.<br />
Tao L, Kameya N, Fukuta Y, Nakamura I. 1997. Molecular clon<strong>in</strong>g<br />
of OSDIM cDNA and its l<strong>in</strong>kage analysis <strong>in</strong> rice. <strong>Rice</strong> Genet.<br />
Newsl. 14:130-133.<br />
Williams JGK, Kabelik AR, Livak KJ, Rafalski JA, T<strong>in</strong>gey SV. 1990.<br />
DNA polymorphisms amplified by arbitrary primers are useful<br />
as genetic markers. Nucl. Acids Res. 18:6531-6535.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ address: Department of <strong>Genetics</strong> and Plant Breed<strong>in</strong>g, College<br />
of Agriculture, University of Agricultural Sciences,<br />
GKVK, Bangalore 560 065, India.<br />
Acknowledgment: F<strong>in</strong>ancial assistance and tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g from the<br />
Rockefeller Foundation Projects 95001#321 and 98001#671<br />
are gratefully acknowledged.<br />
Molecular markers, QTL mapp<strong>in</strong>g, and marker-assisted selection 283
Genes/QTLs affect<strong>in</strong>g flood tolerance <strong>in</strong> rice<br />
K. Sripongpankul, G.B.L. Posa, D. Senadhira, N. Huang, D.S. Brar, G.S. Khush, and Z. Li<br />
A l<strong>in</strong>kage map was constructed from 165 recomb<strong>in</strong>ant <strong>in</strong>bred l<strong>in</strong>es (RILs) derived from IR74/Jalmagna us<strong>in</strong>g 113 amplified<br />
fragment length polymorphisms, 29 restriction fragment length polymorphisms, and two genes (sd1 and adh1). The l<strong>in</strong>kage<br />
map cover<strong>in</strong>g the whole rice genome has a total length of 2,339.9 cM, with an average size between markers of 17.9 ± 10.3<br />
cM. Elongation ability was evaluated on the basis of total plant height <strong>in</strong>crement, <strong>in</strong>ternode elongation, and leaf elongation.<br />
The first test was conducted under greenhouse conditions; the second one was done <strong>in</strong> the field. Six ma<strong>in</strong>-effect QTLs were<br />
detected for plant elongation with an additional n<strong>in</strong>e pairwise epistatic effects. Qlne1 contributed the largest effect (33.8% and<br />
20.1%) for plant and <strong>in</strong>ternode elongation, which was observed <strong>in</strong> test 1. Variations of 29.6% and 33.1% were obta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> test<br />
2 for the same QTL and traits. Qlne4 expla<strong>in</strong>ed 36.7% of the variation <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>ternode elongation, which was observed to be<br />
significant only <strong>in</strong> test 2. The Jalmagna allele contributed for Qlne1, while IR74 contributed for Qlne4. The QTLs for leaf<br />
elongation were detected on chromosomes 6 and 7 (QLe6 and Qle7). A total of 13 QTLs for submergence tolerance were<br />
identified, of which 11 were contributed by Jalmagna and the rest by IR74. The QTL located on chromosome 9 has the highest<br />
variation expla<strong>in</strong>ed, which was contributed by the IR74 allele. Associations between elongation traits and submergence tolerance<br />
were found <strong>in</strong> seven regions (of chromosomes 1, 3, 4, 5, and 7). Adaptation to flood<strong>in</strong>g was ma<strong>in</strong>ly attributed to the<br />
effect of Qlne1 and Qlne4 (plant elongation ability) and sub1(t) (submergence tolerance).<br />
Submergence tolerance and plant elongation are two basic<br />
adaptive mechanisms for rice grown under flood conditions.<br />
Submergence tolerance is the ability of the rice plant to survive<br />
<strong>in</strong> water under completely submerged conditions for 10 d<br />
or more. The ability of the plant to elongate to keep the leaf<br />
canopy above the water surface is referred to as elongation<br />
ability. Flood-prone rice varieties possess one of these characteristics.<br />
Submergence-tolerant varieties can survive flash<br />
floods but will die if water does not recede <strong>in</strong> about 14 d. Varieties<br />
with elongation ability elongate dur<strong>in</strong>g flash floods and<br />
may lodge when water recedes. These two mechanisms are<br />
presumed to be opposite to each other. Thach (1994) showed<br />
that the submergence tolerance gene <strong>in</strong> FR13A is allelic to one<br />
of two complementary genes govern<strong>in</strong>g the elongation ability<br />
of Jalmagna. Therefore, comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the submergence tolerance<br />
of FR13A and the elongation ability of Jalmagna is not possible.<br />
However, Saha Ray et al (1994) reported that submergence<br />
tolerance and elongation ability could be comb<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong><br />
the genotype us<strong>in</strong>g strongly submergence-tolerant parents. The<br />
QTL analysis for flood tolerance of Sripongpankul (1998)<br />
showed that some m<strong>in</strong>or genes/QTLs for elongation ability <strong>in</strong><br />
rice have been located near the region of the major gene/QTL<br />
for submergence tolerance on chromosome 9. The study was<br />
undertaken to map the genes/QTLs controll<strong>in</strong>g submergence<br />
tolerance and elongation ability us<strong>in</strong>g amplified fragment length<br />
polymorphism (AFLP) and restriction fragment length polymorphism<br />
(RFLP) markers <strong>in</strong> recomb<strong>in</strong>ant <strong>in</strong>bred l<strong>in</strong>es (RILs).<br />
Materials and methods<br />
The mapp<strong>in</strong>g population consisted of 165 F 8 RILs derived from<br />
the cross between IR74 (a high-yield<strong>in</strong>g, semidwarf, photoperiod-sensitive,<br />
and nonelongat<strong>in</strong>g variety) and Jalmagna (a traditional<br />
tall, low-yield<strong>in</strong>g, photoperiod-sensitive, and rapidly<br />
elongat<strong>in</strong>g variety). The parent and the RILs were evaluated<br />
for elongation ability and submergence tolerance <strong>in</strong> two experiments.<br />
In test 1, rice plants were submerged under slowly<br />
<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g water levels <strong>in</strong> the greenhouse. In test 2, phenotyp<strong>in</strong>g<br />
for elongation and submergence tolerance was conducted under<br />
slowly <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g water levels <strong>in</strong> the field. In both tests,<br />
elongation ability of each RIL was measured based on <strong>in</strong>crements<br />
<strong>in</strong> plant height, <strong>in</strong>ternode length, and leaf length<br />
(Sripongpankul 1998). For submergence tolerance, l<strong>in</strong>es surviv<strong>in</strong>g<br />
the flood<strong>in</strong>g treatment were given a score of 1 and the<br />
dead ones had 0. AFLP, RFLP, and MAPMAKER/EXP version<br />
3.0 were employed to produce the genotypic data and to<br />
construct the genetic l<strong>in</strong>kage map. The new computer program<br />
QTLMAPPER v1.0 (Wang 1998) was used for genes/QTLs<br />
and epistatic loci, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g that for genetic effect analysis.<br />
The likelihood chi-square statistic G 2 was used to detect the<br />
association between markers and submergence tolerance.<br />
Results and discussion<br />
Jalmagna elongated very fast and survived <strong>in</strong> both tests,<br />
whereas IR74 did not survive <strong>in</strong> test 2. It showed no <strong>in</strong>ternodal<br />
elongation, but significantly elongated leaves of 40.4<br />
cm <strong>in</strong> test 1 (clear water) were observed. Considerable variation<br />
<strong>in</strong> both submergence tolerance and elongation ability existed<br />
<strong>in</strong> the RILs (Fig. 1).<br />
The new genetic l<strong>in</strong>kage map conta<strong>in</strong>ed 144 markers,<br />
<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g 113 AFLPs, 29 RFLPs, and two genes (sd1 and<br />
adh1). The constructed map covered all 12 rice chromosomes<br />
and had a total length of 2,339.9 cM, with an average <strong>in</strong>terval<br />
of 17.9 ± 10.3 cM between markers. Six ma<strong>in</strong>-effect QTLs<br />
and n<strong>in</strong>e pairs of epistatic loci affect<strong>in</strong>g plant elongation ability<br />
were detected (Tables 1 and 2). Thirteen genomic regions<br />
were found significantly associated with submergence tolerance<br />
(Table 3). These <strong>in</strong>cluded three ma<strong>in</strong>-effect QTLs—<br />
Qlne1, Qlne2, and Qlne4—affect<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>ternodal and plant height<br />
284 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
1 2 3 4 5 6 78 9 10 11<br />
RG229 RZ527<br />
P3M6-4 P2M9-8<br />
P1M3-5 P1M9-3 P1M5-15 P1M10-7 P2M7-7 P1M2-8 RG757 P3M6-7<br />
P3M3-6<br />
P2M6-5<br />
P1M3-10<br />
RZ613<br />
RZ495<br />
P1M3-16<br />
P2M9-3<br />
P2M10-14<br />
P3M2-5<br />
P2M5-18<br />
P3M7-6<br />
P1M9-4<br />
P2M5-17<br />
P2M2-7<br />
P2M10-4<br />
P1M5-11<br />
P2M6-12<br />
P1M6-7<br />
P3M3-9<br />
P2M6-8<br />
P2M2-5<br />
P2M1-12<br />
P2M6-3<br />
RZ154<br />
P1M9-11 RG313 P1M3-6<br />
P1M10-4 P2M3-5<br />
P3M7-9 P2M10-2 P3M3-8<br />
P2M6-6<br />
P1M6-6<br />
P1M3-7<br />
P1M10-14<br />
P1M9-12<br />
P2M10-11<br />
P3M6-5<br />
P3M1-5<br />
P3M7-11 P1M10-16<br />
RG541<br />
P3M1-10 P1M6-5 P3M1-11 P3M5-4<br />
P3M1-3<br />
RZ730<br />
RZ444<br />
P1M10-17<br />
P3M5-1<br />
P1M3-9<br />
P1M7-8<br />
P2M7-2 P1M10-12<br />
P3M2-1<br />
RG220<br />
P3M1-9 RZ675<br />
P1M10-5<br />
P2M6-9<br />
P1M2-2<br />
P1M1-5<br />
P1M3-13<br />
P2M5-11<br />
P1M9-10 P2M5-8<br />
P2M7-3<br />
RG109<br />
P1M5-13<br />
P1M10-3<br />
P3M3-3<br />
P1M6-9<br />
RG650<br />
P1M3-12<br />
sd-1<br />
P2M10-7<br />
P2M5-13 RG403 P2M3-6<br />
P3M7-3<br />
P1M1-2<br />
P1M7-3<br />
P1M6-2 P2M10-6 P2M10-5 RG788<br />
Sub1 P2M7-4<br />
RG173<br />
RG449 P2M1-7<br />
P2M2-6<br />
P2M9-4<br />
P2M3-3<br />
P2M7-1<br />
P2M2-8<br />
P1M5-10 P1M6-1<br />
RZ123<br />
RG190<br />
P1M1-1<br />
RZ892<br />
P3M6-2<br />
P3M2-6 RG553<br />
RG98<br />
P3M1-12<br />
RG303<br />
P1M3-14<br />
P2M1-11<br />
P2M9-6<br />
P3M1-1<br />
P3M2-2<br />
RG118<br />
Adh1<br />
P1M3-2<br />
P1M5-19<br />
RZ14<br />
P1M3-15<br />
P2M1-15<br />
Ma<strong>in</strong>-effect QTLs affect<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>ternode elongation<br />
Ma<strong>in</strong>-effect QTLs affect<strong>in</strong>g leaf elongation<br />
Epistatic and ma<strong>in</strong>-effect QTLs affect<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>itial plant height<br />
Markers associated with submergence tolerance<br />
Pairwise epistatic loci affect<strong>in</strong>g plant elongation<br />
Fig. 1. Genomic location for ma<strong>in</strong>-effect QTLs and epistatic loci affect<strong>in</strong>g plant elongation of the IR74/Jalmagna recomb<strong>in</strong>ant <strong>in</strong>bred population.<br />
12<br />
P1M9-9<br />
P3M7-4<br />
RG81<br />
P3M5-9<br />
P1M7-4<br />
P1M6-3<br />
P1M7-6<br />
CDO344<br />
RG543<br />
P1M1-4<br />
RZ76<br />
Molecular markers, QTL mapp<strong>in</strong>g, and marker-assisted selection 285
Table 1. Ma<strong>in</strong>-effect QTLs affect<strong>in</strong>g plant elongation ability detected <strong>in</strong> the IR74/Jalmagna recomb<strong>in</strong>ant<br />
<strong>in</strong>bred population.<br />
Trait a QTL Chromosome Marker <strong>in</strong>terval<br />
Test 1 Test 2<br />
LOD a (cm) R 2 (%) LOD a (cm) R 2 (%)<br />
PHI QLne1 1 RG109–sd-1 10.5 –13.6 33.8 21.5 –23.2 29.6<br />
PHI QLne2 2 P2M9-8–P2M6-8 – – – 7.4 –14.2 11.2<br />
PHI QLne4 4 P3M1-5–P3M5-1 – – – 12.6 21.8 25.6<br />
INI QLne1 1 RG109–sd-1 7.0 –8.7 20.1 18.9 –18.2 33.1<br />
INI QLne2 2 P2M9-8–P2M6-8 – – – 5.1 –9.6 8.6<br />
INI QLne4 4 P3M1-5–P3M5-1 – – – 10.7 21.8 36.7<br />
LLI QLe4 4 P3M5-1–P2M5-8 6.2 –6.2 14.2 – – –<br />
LLI QLe6 6 P1M10-7–P2M5-17 2.5 4.9 9.4 – – –<br />
LLI QLe7 7 P1M3-9–P1M10-5 – – – 3.7 –3.5 12.0<br />
a PHI, INI, and LLI are <strong>in</strong>crements <strong>in</strong> plant height, <strong>in</strong>ternode, and leaf length. The gene effect, a, is the phenotypic effect due to substitution<br />
of the Jalmagna allele by the IR74 allele.<br />
Table 2. Digenic epistatic QTLs affect<strong>in</strong>g plant elongation ability identified <strong>in</strong> the IR74/Jalmagna recomb<strong>in</strong>ant <strong>in</strong>bred population.<br />
Trait a Chromosome Interval i Chromosome Interval j LOD a i (cm) a j (cm) aa ij (cm) R 2<br />
PHI (1) 4 RG109–sd-1 5 RG403–P1M1-2 13.0 –6.1 8.2 –10.5 13.7<br />
2 P3M1-9–P2M5-11 7 P1M6-6–P3M7-11 6.0 4.0 –9.2 10.2<br />
2 P2M10-7–P2M10-6 12 P1M6-3–P1M7-6 5.2 4.3 –9.0 9.8<br />
4 P2M5-8–P2M5-13 6 P1M5-13–P2M3-6 5.6 –9.1 10.0<br />
PHI (2) 1 P2M10-11–RG541 9 RG553–P2M1-15 4.1 –9.1 6.2<br />
2 P1M10-17–P3M1-9 5 P1M2-2–P2M7-3 3.6 5.9 5.1<br />
3 P2M10-2–P3M6-5 6 P1M5-13–P2M3-6 3.6 8.4 5.9<br />
7 P1M10-5–RG650 10 P1M7-3–RZ892 6.3 5.1 5.8 4.8<br />
INI (1) 2 P3M1-9–P2M5-11 7 P3M7-11–P3M1-11 5.6 –7.9 19.4<br />
4 P3M1-5–P3M5-1 5 RG403–P1M1-2 10.8 –21.2 23.7 35.5<br />
INI (2) 2 P1M10-17–P3M1-9 5 P1M2-2–P2M7-3 4.0 8.0 6.4<br />
3 P2M10-2–P3M6-5 6 P1M5-13–P2M3-6 4.7 8.6 7.4<br />
7 P1M10-5–RG650 10 P1M7-3–RZ892 7.3 5.1 8.8 7.8<br />
LLI (1) 1 RG109–sd-1 5 RG403–P1M1-2 10.8 –17.9 12.7 25.0<br />
a (1) and (2) represent QTLs detected <strong>in</strong> tests 1 and 2, respectively. a i and a j are the ma<strong>in</strong> QTL effects associated with ith and jth loci, and aa ij is the epistatic effect<br />
of QTLs.<br />
Table 3. Genomic regions show<strong>in</strong>g significant association with submergence tolerance<br />
<strong>in</strong> the IR74/Jalmagna recomb<strong>in</strong>ant <strong>in</strong>bred population.<br />
Chromosome Marker a G 2 Tolerance allele G 2 Tolerance allele<br />
1 P1M6-2 23.2 Jalmagna<br />
1 RG541 6.4 Jalmagna 5.1 Jalmagna<br />
3 P1M3-5 15.7 IR74<br />
4 P2M5-8 19.7 Jalmagna<br />
4 P3M1-5 5.9 Jalmagna<br />
5 P1M6-9 7.2 Jalmagna 9.4 Jalmagna<br />
7 P1M3-9 5.2 Jalmagna<br />
8 P3M7-3 6.9 Jalmagna 11.9 Jalmagna<br />
9 P2M7-4, Sub1(t) 5.1 IR74 58.3 IR74<br />
9 P2M5-18 6.6 Jalmagna<br />
10 P3M1-3 13.0 Jalmagna<br />
11 P3M1-12 8.0 Jalmagna<br />
12 P3M7-4 6.0 Jalmagna<br />
a Underl<strong>in</strong>ed markers are associated with detected QTLs affect<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>ternodal or plant elongation. G 2 is the<br />
likelihood ratio chi-square statistic. The significant values of G 2 at P = 0.05, 0.01, and 0.001 are 3.79,<br />
6.63, and 11.60, respectively.<br />
286 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
elongation. The Jalmagna allele at Qlne1 had a large effect on<br />
plant and <strong>in</strong>ternodal elongation <strong>in</strong> test 1 (13.6 cm, R 2 = 33.8%,<br />
and 8.7 cm, R 2 = 20.1%). In contrast, 23.2 cm (R 2 = 29.6%)<br />
and 18.2 cm (R 2 = 33.1%) elongation were observed <strong>in</strong> test 2.<br />
Qlne4 was detected only <strong>in</strong> test 2 and the IR74 allele at this<br />
locus had a very large effect (21.8 cm, R 2 = 36.7%) on elongated<br />
<strong>in</strong>ternodes. Qlne2 detected from test 2 and the Jalmagna<br />
allele caused elongation <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>ternodes. Two ma<strong>in</strong>-effect<br />
QTLs affect<strong>in</strong>g leaf elongation, Qlne6 (R 2 = 9.4%) found <strong>in</strong><br />
test 1 and Qlne7 (R 2 = 12.0%) detected <strong>in</strong> test 2, were also<br />
identified. Together, the ma<strong>in</strong>-effect and epistatic QTLs expla<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
most of the total variation observed <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>ternodal and<br />
plant elongation <strong>in</strong> both tests.<br />
Eleven of Jalmagna’s alleles are present <strong>in</strong> the 13 genomic<br />
regions that were associated with submergence tolerance;<br />
the other two come from IR74. Seven (on chromosomes<br />
1, 3, 4, 5, and 7) of the 13 submergence tolerance loci were<br />
also found <strong>in</strong> the QTL regions for plant elongation. The other<br />
six genomic regions on chromosomes 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12 were<br />
associated with submergence tolerance only. Of these, the<br />
marker show<strong>in</strong>g the strongest association with submergence<br />
tolerance was P2M7-4 on chromosome 9, where a major gene<br />
for submergence tolerance, Sub1(t), was previously reported<br />
(Xu and Mackill 1995, Nandi et al 1997). Surpris<strong>in</strong>gly, the<br />
IR74 allele at this locus contributed strongly to submergence<br />
tolerance.<br />
This study po<strong>in</strong>ted to the fact that while adaptation of<br />
Jalmagna to flood<strong>in</strong>g conditions could be attributed to a large<br />
number of loci associated with plant elongation and submergence<br />
tolerance, the differential expression of alleles at three<br />
loci played a key role. These <strong>in</strong>cluded Qlne1 and Qlne4 that<br />
affect plant height and <strong>in</strong>ternodal elongation and Sub(t) on<br />
chromosome 9 that affects submergence tolerance. A third locus<br />
appeared on chromosome 5 that <strong>in</strong>teracted with both Qlne1<br />
and Qlne4. The epistatic relationships among the three loci<br />
need to be understood before they can be effectively transferred<br />
<strong>in</strong>to elite rice l<strong>in</strong>es by marker-assisted breed<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
References<br />
Nandi S, Subudhi PK, Senadhira D, Manigbas NL, Sen-Mandi S,<br />
Huang N. 1997. Mapp<strong>in</strong>g QTLs for submergence tolerance <strong>in</strong><br />
rice by AFLP analysis and selective genotyp<strong>in</strong>g. Mol. Gen.<br />
Genet. 225:1-8.<br />
Saha Ray PK, HilleRisLambers D, Tepora NM. 1994. <strong>Genetics</strong> of<br />
stem elongation ability <strong>in</strong> rice (Oryza sativa). Euphytica<br />
74:137-141.<br />
Sripongpankul K. 1998. Gene mapp<strong>in</strong>g and quantitative trait loci<br />
analysis of flood tolerance <strong>in</strong> rice (Oryza sativa). Ph.D. dissertation,<br />
University of the Philipp<strong>in</strong>es Los Baños, Laguna,<br />
Philipp<strong>in</strong>es. 137 p.<br />
Thach TD. 1994. The genetic association between elongation ability<br />
and submergence tolerance <strong>in</strong> rice (Oryza sativa). M.S. thesis,<br />
Central Luzon State University, Nueva Ecija, Philipp<strong>in</strong>es.<br />
65 p.<br />
Wang DL. 1998. A mixed model approach for mapp<strong>in</strong>g QTLs with<br />
epistatic effects. Ph.D. dissertation, Zheijiang Agricultural<br />
University, Ch<strong>in</strong>a.<br />
Xu K, Mackill DJ. 1995. RAPD and RFLP mapp<strong>in</strong>g of a submergence<br />
tolerance locus <strong>in</strong> rice. <strong>Rice</strong> Genet. Newsl. 12:244-245.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ addresses: K. Sripongpankul, Biotechnology Research and<br />
Development Center, Department of Agriculture, Chatuchak,<br />
Bangkok 10900, Thailand; G.B.L. Posa, D. Senadhira, N.<br />
Huang, D.S. Brar, G.S. Khush, and Z. Li, <strong>International</strong> <strong>Rice</strong><br />
Research Institute, DAPO Box 7777, Metro Manila, Philipp<strong>in</strong>es.<br />
Acknowledgment: The authors are grateful to the Rockefeller Foundation<br />
for its f<strong>in</strong>ancial support.<br />
Mapp<strong>in</strong>g genes that control traits related to submergence<br />
tolerance <strong>in</strong> rice<br />
M. Seanglew, A. Vanavichit, S. Tragoonrung, and S. Sarkarung<br />
A l<strong>in</strong>kage map cover<strong>in</strong>g the whole rice genome was constructed from 172 recomb<strong>in</strong>ant <strong>in</strong>bred l<strong>in</strong>es (RILs) derived from the<br />
cross between FR13A (submergence-tolerant) and CT6241 (susceptible), us<strong>in</strong>g 41 restriction fragment length polymorphisms,<br />
102 simple s<strong>in</strong>gle length polymorphisms, and one simple sequence cleaved polymorphism (SSCP). Field evaluations of traits<br />
responsive to submergence stresses were performed at Ayuttaya, Thailand, <strong>in</strong> 1998 and 1999. Twenty-eight-day-old seedl<strong>in</strong>gs<br />
of 405 RILs with their parents were submerged <strong>in</strong> water 100–120 cm deep. Water was dra<strong>in</strong>ed when the susceptible parent<br />
died. Plants showed slow elongation under water with green leaves after submergence and this was significantly correlated with<br />
plant recovery. QTL analysis showed that major QTLs for plant elongation, leaf-stay-green <strong>in</strong>dex, recovery rate, and plant<br />
recovery after submergence were located on chromosome 9, account<strong>in</strong>g for 9%, 45%, 51%, and 63% of phenotypic variation,<br />
respectively. Secondary QTLs were detected on chromosomes 2 and 7 and can additively enhance the effect of QTL ch9<br />
. The<br />
allele effect showed that faster plant recovery and more vigorous plants were contributed by FR13A. The results showed that<br />
the chromosomal segment close to the marker with the FR13A genotype represented faster plant recovery after submergence,<br />
while the CT6241 genotype showed the opposite.<br />
Molecular markers, QTL mapp<strong>in</strong>g, and marker-assisted selection 287
<strong>Rice</strong> is grown worldwide under a wide range of agroclimatic<br />
conditions. <strong>Rice</strong> productivity is affected by several biotic (diseases<br />
and <strong>in</strong>sects) and abiotic (unfavorable soil, temperature,<br />
and water conditions) stresses. One of the most important<br />
stresses that affect growth and yield of rice is submergence<br />
under water. More than 30 × 10 6 ha of ra<strong>in</strong>fed lowland rice<br />
areas are affected by flash flood<strong>in</strong>g (Pigg<strong>in</strong> et al 1988). In the<br />
ra<strong>in</strong>fed lowland areas of eastern India, submergence is the third<br />
most serious factor that limits rice production. One such type<br />
of submergence is flash flood<strong>in</strong>g, which affects areas of the<br />
ra<strong>in</strong>fed lowland rice ecosystem (Maurya et al 1988). In this<br />
area, rate of elongation under water of ra<strong>in</strong>fed lowland rice<br />
results <strong>in</strong> lodg<strong>in</strong>g and death of plants after the water recedes.<br />
Hence, plants adapted to these areas must have submergence<br />
tolerance. Wild rice species are an important reservoir of useful<br />
genes <strong>in</strong> breed<strong>in</strong>g for tolerance for submergence stress. In<br />
this study, recomb<strong>in</strong>ant <strong>in</strong>bred l<strong>in</strong>es (RILs) from the cross between<br />
submergence-tolerant FR13A and submergence-susceptible<br />
CT6241 were used <strong>in</strong> the construction and mapp<strong>in</strong>g of<br />
genes that control submergence tolerance <strong>in</strong> rice us<strong>in</strong>g simple<br />
s<strong>in</strong>gle length polymorphisms (SSLPs), simple sequence cleaved<br />
polymorphism (SSCP), and restriction fragment length polymorphisms<br />
(RFLPs). Traits related to submergence tolerance<br />
<strong>in</strong> rice such as leaf-stay-green <strong>in</strong>dex, plant recovery, and plant<br />
elongation were used <strong>in</strong> quantitative trait loci (QTL) mapp<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
Materials and methods<br />
RILs consist<strong>in</strong>g of 172 <strong>in</strong>dividuals were developed by <strong>IRRI</strong><br />
from a cross between <strong>in</strong>dica rice FR13A and japonica rice<br />
CT6241-17-1-5-1. Total genomic DNA of each of the 172 RILs<br />
and their parents was extracted from leaf tissues us<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
CTAB-NaCl method.<br />
For RFLP analysis, parental DNA as well as RILs were<br />
digested with seven restriction enzymes (BamHI, BglII, DraI,<br />
EcoRI, EcoRV, H<strong>in</strong>dIII, and XbaI) accord<strong>in</strong>g to the<br />
manufacturer’s <strong>in</strong>structions (Boehr<strong>in</strong>ger Mannheim). The SSLP<br />
procedure was performed accord<strong>in</strong>g to Chen et al (1997) and<br />
SSCP was performed.<br />
The RIL population and four check cultivars (FR13A,<br />
IR49830, CT6241, and IR42) were tested for submergence<br />
stress under field conditions at Huntra, Thailand, <strong>in</strong> 1998. The<br />
172 RILs and checks were also tested at the same place <strong>in</strong><br />
1999. A s<strong>in</strong>gle replication was used <strong>in</strong> 1998 and two replications<br />
were used <strong>in</strong> 1999. Individual l<strong>in</strong>es were direct-seeded<br />
<strong>in</strong> a two-row plot, 75 cm <strong>in</strong> length and with 25 cm distance<br />
between rows. Checks were systematically seeded every 10<br />
plots. Four weeks after seed<strong>in</strong>g, the experimental crop was<br />
completely submerged. The water level was kept 30 and 60<br />
cm above the tallest entries to prevent their leaf tips from emerg<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>in</strong>to the atmosphere <strong>in</strong> 1998 and 1999, respectively. Dissolved<br />
oxygen concentrations measured at the same period after<br />
3 d of submergence were 5.0–6.3 ppm and 4.8–5.5 ppm at the<br />
crop canopy and soil surface, respectively. Water temperature<br />
was 23–24 °C throughout the experiment. Light transmissions,<br />
dissolved oxygen concentrations, and water temperature were<br />
not measured <strong>in</strong> 1999.<br />
Traits responsive to submergence stress<br />
Plant elongation. Plant elongation was calculated as the average<br />
of plant height difference before submergence and after<br />
desubmergence. Plant height of 10 randomly selected plants<br />
per genotype was recorded as the distance from the soil surface<br />
to the tip of the longest leaf. Plant elongation was recorded<br />
only <strong>in</strong> the 1998 RIL experiment.<br />
Leaf-stay-green <strong>in</strong>dex. This <strong>in</strong>dex is described as the<br />
ability of the leaves to stay green without senescence under<br />
water. It was scored immediately after desubmergence us<strong>in</strong>g a<br />
1–5 score on a plot basis. The score was based on the number<br />
of yellow leaves, where 1 = all leaves not senesc<strong>in</strong>g and 5 = all<br />
leaves with complete senescence.<br />
Recovery score. Plant recovery is described as the ability<br />
of the plant to overcome submergence stress by regrow<strong>in</strong>g<br />
the plant that was subjected to stress. Recovery was visually<br />
scored after desubmergence at 0, 5, 10, and 15 d for the RIL<br />
population and compar<strong>in</strong>g recovery with that of check cultivars<br />
us<strong>in</strong>g a 1–9 scale modified from Suprihatno and Coffman<br />
(1981). The best recovery check, FR13A, had a score of 1.<br />
IR49830 had a score of 2. CT6241 and IR42, the most susceptible<br />
checks, were scored as 9 (completely dead).<br />
Recovery rate. Recovery rate is described as how fast<br />
plants can recover from submergence stress after<br />
desubmergence. Recovery rate was calculated by simple regression<br />
as follows:<br />
Y = a + bX<br />
where Y = recovery score, X = days after desubmergence (5,<br />
10, and 15 d for our scor<strong>in</strong>g and 5, 10, and 14 d for <strong>IRRI</strong> <strong>in</strong><br />
1998, and 3, 5, and 10 d for our scor<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> 1999), a = <strong>in</strong>tercept,<br />
and b = recovery rate (slope).<br />
L<strong>in</strong>kage and QTL analyses<br />
Jo<strong>in</strong>Map software version 2.0 (Stam and Van Ooijen 1995)<br />
was used for l<strong>in</strong>kage map construction. The l<strong>in</strong>kage map was<br />
constructed us<strong>in</strong>g 152 markers (41 RFLPs, 102 SSLPs, 1 SSCP,<br />
and 9 bacterial artificial chromosome, BAC, end probes). The<br />
BAC end probes were developed by Kamonsukyunyong<br />
(1999). The f<strong>in</strong>al l<strong>in</strong>kage map was calculated us<strong>in</strong>g a maximum<br />
recomb<strong>in</strong>ation frequency (rmax) of 0.50 and an LOD<br />
score of 6.0. The genetic distances (cM) were calculated from<br />
recomb<strong>in</strong>ation values us<strong>in</strong>g the Kosambi function. QTL analysis<br />
was performed with the software package MQTL (T<strong>in</strong>ker<br />
and Mather 1995). Both simple <strong>in</strong>terval mapp<strong>in</strong>g (SIM) and<br />
simplified composite <strong>in</strong>terval mapp<strong>in</strong>g (sCIM) techniques were<br />
used for QTL detection. A significant threshold (an LOD score<br />
of 2.4 or above) was used to declare the presence of a QTL. A<br />
s<strong>in</strong>gle-marker analysis us<strong>in</strong>g regression-based software,<br />
Statgraphics 2.1 and ANOVA, was then used to detect the twolocus<br />
<strong>in</strong>teraction of QTLs for the traits responsive to submergence<br />
stress.<br />
288 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
RILs<br />
RILs<br />
60<br />
50 FR13A<br />
50 A CT6241<br />
FR13A 40<br />
CT6241 B<br />
40<br />
30<br />
30<br />
20<br />
20<br />
10 10<br />
0 0<br />
1767<br />
27 37 47 57<br />
–6 4 14 24 34 44 54<br />
Plant height before submergence (cm)<br />
Plant elongation (cm)<br />
120<br />
CT6241<br />
100 C<br />
80<br />
60 FR13A<br />
40<br />
20<br />
0<br />
80<br />
60<br />
40<br />
20<br />
0<br />
E<br />
3 4 5<br />
Leaf-stay-green <strong>in</strong>dex (1998)<br />
FR13A<br />
CT6241<br />
2 4 6 8<br />
Recovery score (1998)<br />
50<br />
CT6241<br />
40<br />
G<br />
30<br />
20 FR13A<br />
10<br />
0<br />
–0.48 –0.28 –0.08 0.12 0.32<br />
Recovery rate (1998)<br />
120<br />
100<br />
80<br />
60<br />
40<br />
D<br />
FR13A<br />
20<br />
0<br />
3<br />
CT6241<br />
1 2 4 5<br />
Leaf-stay-green <strong>in</strong>dex (1999)<br />
CT6241<br />
120<br />
100 F<br />
80<br />
60<br />
40 FR13A<br />
20<br />
0<br />
5 6 7 8 9<br />
Recovery score (1999)<br />
CT6241<br />
100<br />
80<br />
H<br />
60<br />
40 FR13A<br />
20<br />
0<br />
–0.52 –0.32 –0.12 0.08 0.28 0.48<br />
Recovery rate (1999)<br />
Fig. 1. A = frequency distribution<br />
of plant height before submergence<br />
(cm), B = plant elongation<br />
(cm), C = leaf-stay-green <strong>in</strong>dex<br />
<strong>in</strong> 1998, D = leaf-stay-green <strong>in</strong>dex<br />
<strong>in</strong> 1999, E = recovery score<br />
<strong>in</strong> 1998, F = recovery score <strong>in</strong><br />
1999, G = recovery rate <strong>in</strong> 1998,<br />
and H = recovery rate <strong>in</strong> 1999<br />
of 172 recomb<strong>in</strong>ant <strong>in</strong>bred l<strong>in</strong>es<br />
(RILs) derived from FR13A/<br />
CT6241.<br />
Results and discussion<br />
Phenotypic distribution <strong>in</strong> submergence tolerance<br />
Phenotypic distribution of all traits measured <strong>in</strong> both years<br />
supported a major gene with other modify<strong>in</strong>g effects or quantitative<br />
modes of <strong>in</strong>heritance. The phenotypic distribution of<br />
all the traits studied did not show discrete classes for Mendelian<br />
analysis (Fig. 1). There were transgressive segregants that<br />
elongate faster than CT6241. Segregation for leaf-stay-green<br />
<strong>in</strong>dex favored more senescent and less vigorous plants. Plant<br />
recovery showed quantitative distribution. The recovery rates<br />
of tolerant and <strong>in</strong>tolerant parents <strong>in</strong> 1998 were 0.45 and 0.06<br />
score unit per day, respectively; the respective rates were 0.48<br />
and 0.05 <strong>in</strong> 1999. Recovery rate was positively correlated with<br />
leaf-stay-green <strong>in</strong>dex, recovery score, and plant elongation.<br />
L<strong>in</strong>kage map construction and QTL analysis<br />
Sixty percent of the 243 markers show<strong>in</strong>g polymorphism between<br />
the parents were used to screen for segregation <strong>in</strong> the<br />
172 <strong>in</strong>dividuals <strong>in</strong> the RIL population. The 153-marker framework<br />
map encompasses a total genetic distance of 1,217.7 cM<br />
(Fig. 2). Fifty-two percent of the markers were significantly<br />
distorted randomly from the expected 1:1 ratio (P
Chr 1 Chr 2<br />
Chr 3 Chr 4<br />
cM<br />
C161<br />
6.6<br />
4.0<br />
RM84 5.7 OSR1 0.9 RM251<br />
OSR15<br />
1.0<br />
RM1 9.8 RM233F<br />
1.1 RM7<br />
R1944 9.9 RM233<br />
5.5 RM232 19.4<br />
2.9<br />
10.9 RM233<br />
OSR13<br />
OSR16 1.2 RM241<br />
20.6<br />
RM53<br />
RM252<br />
3.5<br />
10.0<br />
2.5<br />
7.1<br />
4.3<br />
6.3<br />
1.6<br />
5.8<br />
0.5<br />
2.5<br />
4.6<br />
2.2<br />
5.3<br />
7.9<br />
RM243<br />
RM35<br />
R210<br />
RM23<br />
RM24<br />
R1928<br />
RM5<br />
RM9<br />
RM237<br />
C122<br />
RM246A<br />
OSR27<br />
RM212<br />
C86<br />
R2414<br />
40.5<br />
25.6<br />
11.6<br />
13.9<br />
9.0<br />
2.7<br />
2.0<br />
2.3<br />
11.5<br />
3.3<br />
RM29<br />
RM262<br />
C49<br />
RM221<br />
RM240<br />
RM6<br />
RM250A<br />
C56<br />
RM208<br />
RM48<br />
58.2<br />
11.3<br />
14.5<br />
RM16<br />
R250<br />
RM55<br />
15.1<br />
32.1<br />
3.5<br />
11.5<br />
RM246B<br />
RM261<br />
R288<br />
R2373<br />
Chr 5<br />
8.3<br />
8.5<br />
5.9<br />
9.0<br />
5.5<br />
1.9<br />
5.6<br />
17.6<br />
35.3<br />
55.3<br />
RM31<br />
RM26<br />
C1018<br />
RM233B<br />
R1553<br />
RM164<br />
R2289<br />
R372<br />
RM249<br />
RM13<br />
OSR34<br />
12.8<br />
0.0<br />
2.9<br />
7.1<br />
9.3<br />
12.2<br />
17.6<br />
50.8<br />
Chr 6<br />
R2869<br />
RM204<br />
RM225<br />
RM217<br />
RM253<br />
R2147<br />
R2171<br />
RM3<br />
C358<br />
1.3<br />
32.3<br />
12.2<br />
2.9<br />
4.4<br />
1.2<br />
2.9<br />
8.0<br />
2.4<br />
23.8<br />
Chr 7Chr 8 Chr 9<br />
Chr 10 Chr 11 Chr 12<br />
C213<br />
RM248<br />
RM234<br />
RM10<br />
OSR4<br />
C451<br />
RM11<br />
OSR22<br />
RM214<br />
RM2<br />
C1057<br />
17.3<br />
4.5<br />
1.7<br />
4.9<br />
2.9<br />
9.9<br />
9.0<br />
1.8<br />
10.0<br />
19.5<br />
13.1<br />
5.6<br />
R1963<br />
RM230<br />
OSR7<br />
RM80<br />
RM256<br />
RM210<br />
RM42<br />
RM44<br />
RM223<br />
RM25<br />
OSR30<br />
RM250B<br />
OSR35<br />
2.2<br />
0.7<br />
5.8<br />
3.5<br />
3.5<br />
1.1<br />
10.7<br />
4.5<br />
36.8<br />
0.0<br />
1.2<br />
5.9<br />
7.4<br />
0.6<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
1.9<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
1.0<br />
0.7<br />
RM205<br />
OSR12<br />
RM245<br />
RM215<br />
RM201<br />
OSR28<br />
OSR29<br />
RM242<br />
RM257<br />
R79<br />
RZ206<br />
G103<br />
C1454<br />
RM219<br />
u<br />
RZ698<br />
ag<br />
ad<br />
v<br />
YAC30L<br />
x<br />
aa<br />
SSC1<br />
R1164<br />
g<br />
b<br />
S10709<br />
RG757<br />
G36<br />
13.4<br />
2.8<br />
6.0<br />
30.1<br />
7.9<br />
6.9<br />
RM228<br />
R1877<br />
OSR33<br />
RM258<br />
R1629<br />
RM216<br />
RM222<br />
= QTL<br />
6.8<br />
9.0<br />
13.8<br />
12.7<br />
8.1<br />
2.2<br />
9.3<br />
6.8<br />
25.4<br />
1.4<br />
1.3<br />
10.6<br />
C950<br />
RM224<br />
RM254<br />
RM206<br />
RM21 15.9<br />
RM229<br />
RM209<br />
18.2<br />
C3<br />
RM202 0.5<br />
12.5<br />
1.6<br />
RM4A<br />
RM4B<br />
RM20B<br />
OSR1<br />
1.9<br />
1.1<br />
1.7<br />
27.7<br />
RM12<br />
RM17<br />
C901<br />
RM235<br />
C449<br />
OSR32<br />
RM247<br />
G24B<br />
R642<br />
RM20A<br />
Fig. 2. L<strong>in</strong>kage maps based on 172 recomb<strong>in</strong>ant <strong>in</strong>bred (RI) progenies from the cross FR13A/T6241. Marker<br />
loci are <strong>in</strong>dicated on the right side of each l<strong>in</strong>kage group, distance expressed <strong>in</strong> Kosambi cM units. Designations<br />
RG and RZ are for restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) markers by Cornell University, USA.<br />
R, G, C, and s were for RFLP markers provided by the <strong>Rice</strong> Genome Project, Japan. OSR and RM were for<br />
simple s<strong>in</strong>gle length polymorphism (SSLP) markers from the <strong>Rice</strong> Genome Project, Japan, and Cornell University,<br />
USA. The double l<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong>dicates large gaps.<br />
290 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
covery rate, and plant elongation were all scored. The results<br />
supported the f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g that QTL ch9 had the highest PVE. Furthermore,<br />
QTL ch9 was the only QTL detected for the second<br />
round of phenotyp<strong>in</strong>g test as the major gene. It was the only<br />
QTL detected s<strong>in</strong>ce the plants became too stressed after submerg<strong>in</strong>g<br />
them for a long time. M<strong>in</strong>or QTLs were detected on<br />
chromosomes 2 (QTL ch2 ) and 7 (QTL ch7 ). Both loci comb<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
had less than 15% PVE compared with 60–70% observed with<br />
QTL ch9 . The multiloci model revealed that both m<strong>in</strong>or QTLs<br />
had little effect on the major QTL ch9 . These m<strong>in</strong>or QTLs could<br />
be partial duplicates of QTL ch9 . This hypothesis was supported<br />
<strong>in</strong> the two-locus <strong>in</strong>teraction analysis. By compar<strong>in</strong>g four group<br />
means of all responsive traits, replac<strong>in</strong>g FR13A alleles with<br />
CT alleles at the m<strong>in</strong>or QTLs will not be better than hav<strong>in</strong>g<br />
three FR13A alleles. A specific <strong>in</strong>teraction was observed after<br />
desubmergence. The FR allele of QTL ch2 played a role <strong>in</strong> the<br />
first few days after desubmergence, but this was slowly m<strong>in</strong>imized<br />
a few days later when QTL ch7 ga<strong>in</strong>ed more importance.<br />
Breed<strong>in</strong>g for greater tolerance for submergence stresses must<br />
consider not only QTL ch9 but also the two m<strong>in</strong>or QTLs.<br />
QTL × QTL <strong>in</strong>teraction<br />
The ANOVA and multiple regression of QTL ch2 × QTL ch9 and<br />
QTL ch7 × QTL ch9 <strong>in</strong>teractions were significant for all responsive<br />
traits. FR13A, the tolerant parent, contributed tolerance<br />
alleles for all QTLs. The means of responsive traits for C QTLch2<br />
× F QTLch9 and C QTLch7 × F QTLch9 phenotypes showed <strong>in</strong>termediate<br />
tolerance, while F QTLch2 × F QTLch9 and F QTLch7 × F QTLch9<br />
showed the highest tolerance for submergence. F QTLch2 ×<br />
C QTLch9 and F QTLch7 × C QTLch9 showed the highest susceptibility<br />
to submergence stress. The mean values of four allelic compositions<br />
at these QTLs illustrated that QTL ch9 was the major<br />
QTL for response to submergence stress. In nearly every case,<br />
progenies carry<strong>in</strong>g QTL ch7 and QTL ch2 could additively enhance<br />
the effect of QTL ch9 . Graphical genotyp<strong>in</strong>g analysis also<br />
proved that the region of chromosome 9 conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the QTL<br />
for submergence tolerance is the most important segment of<br />
the genome for the expression of this trait (data not shown).<br />
References<br />
Chen X, Temnykh S, Xu Y, Cho YG, McCouch SR. 1997. Development<br />
of a microsatellite framework map provid<strong>in</strong>g genomewide<br />
coverage <strong>in</strong> rice (Oryza sativa L.). Theor. Appl. Genet.<br />
95:553-567.<br />
Kamonsukyunyong W. 1999. Construction of physical map us<strong>in</strong>g<br />
BAC: submergence tolerance QTL as a model. MS thesis,<br />
Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand.<br />
Maurya DM, Bottrall A, Farr<strong>in</strong>gton J. 1988. Improved livelihoods,<br />
genetic diversity and farmer participation: a strategy for rice<br />
breed<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> ra<strong>in</strong>fed areas of India. Exp. Agric. 24:311-320.<br />
Nandi S, Subudhi PK, Senadhira D, Manigbas NL, Sen-Mandi S,<br />
Huang N. 1997. Mapp<strong>in</strong>g QTLs for submergence tolerance <strong>in</strong><br />
rice by AFLP and selective genotyp<strong>in</strong>g. Mol. Gen. Genet.<br />
255:1-8.<br />
Pigg<strong>in</strong> C, Bhuiyan S, Ito O, Kam S, Kirk G, Ladha JK, McLaren G,<br />
Moody K, Mortimer M, Nelson R, Pandey S, Paris T, Reichardt<br />
W, Sarkarung S, Setter T, S<strong>in</strong>gh RK, S<strong>in</strong>gh VP, Trebuil G,<br />
Tuong T, Wade L, Zeigler R. 1988. The <strong>IRRI</strong> Ra<strong>in</strong>fed Lowland<br />
<strong>Rice</strong> Research Program: directions and achievements.<br />
Manila (Philipp<strong>in</strong>es): <strong>IRRI</strong>. 98 p.<br />
Stam P, Van Ooijen JW. 1995. Jo<strong>in</strong>Map Version 2.0: software for<br />
the calculation of genetic l<strong>in</strong>kage maps. CPRO-DLO,<br />
Wagen<strong>in</strong>gen, The Netherlands. 58 p.<br />
Suprihatno B, Coffman WR. 1981. Inheritance of submergence tolerance<br />
<strong>in</strong> rice (Oryza sativa L.). SABRAO J. 13:98-108.<br />
T<strong>in</strong>ker NA, Mather DE. 1995. MQTL: software for simplified composite<br />
<strong>in</strong>terval mapp<strong>in</strong>g of QTL <strong>in</strong> multiple environments. J<br />
QTL. Available at http://probe.nalusda.gov:8000/otherdocs/<br />
jqtl/1995-02. 25 November 1998.<br />
Xu K, Mackill DJ. 1996. A major locus for submergence tolerance<br />
mapped on rice chromosome 9. Mol. Breed. 2:219-224.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ addresses: M. Seanglew, A. Vanavichit, S. Tragoonrung,<br />
DNA Technology Laboratory, Kasetsart University,<br />
Kamphangsaen Campus, Nakorn Pathom 73140, Thailand; S.<br />
Sarkarung, <strong>International</strong> <strong>Rice</strong> Research Institute, DAPO Box<br />
7777, Metro Manila, Philipp<strong>in</strong>es.<br />
Identify<strong>in</strong>g QTLs for cold tolerance–related traits<br />
<strong>in</strong> a Korean weedy rice<br />
J.P. Suh, S.N. Ahn, H.S. Suh, H.P. Moon, and H.C. Choi<br />
Molecular markers were used to locate quantitative trait loci (QTLs) for traits related to cold tolerance <strong>in</strong> an <strong>in</strong>trasubspecific<br />
backcross of rice. A cross was made between cold-susceptible Tongil-type cultivar Milyang23 and cold-tolerant Korean japonica<br />
weedy accession Hapcheonaengmi 3. A total of 98 BC 1<br />
plants derived from a Milyang23/Hapcheonaengmi 3//Milyang23 cross<br />
were evaluated for four traits: germ<strong>in</strong>ation at 15 °C, seedl<strong>in</strong>g height, and cold <strong>in</strong>jury at the plumule and seedl<strong>in</strong>g stages. A<br />
l<strong>in</strong>kage map was constructed us<strong>in</strong>g 2 morphological, 2 isozyme, 11 RFLP, 57 RAPD, 18 OSR, and 72 microsatellite markers<br />
that spanned 1,733 cM of the rice genome, with an average <strong>in</strong>terval length of 10.7 cM. Interval analysis identified a m<strong>in</strong>imum<br />
of 13 QTLs for 4 traits, with a range of 3–4 QTLs detected per trait. The direction of the additive gene effect co<strong>in</strong>cided with that<br />
predicted by phenotypes of the parents except for one on chromosome 6 related to germ<strong>in</strong>ation at low temperature. The<br />
percentage of phenotypic variation associated with s<strong>in</strong>gle QTLs ranged from 9.3% to 18.6%. Multilocus analysis showed that<br />
Molecular markers, QTL mapp<strong>in</strong>g, and marker-assisted selection 291
the cumulative action of all QTLs detected for each trait accounted for 31.8–38.1% of the phenotypic variation. Digenic<br />
epistasis was not detected. Several regions of the genome showed effects on more than one trait. The identification of QTLs for<br />
low-temperature germ<strong>in</strong>ability and cold tolerance at the early growth stage would be useful <strong>in</strong> mak<strong>in</strong>g effective selection for<br />
breed<strong>in</strong>g cold-tolerant rice varieties.<br />
Weedy rice possesses useful genes for tolerance for a wide<br />
range of adverse conditions because it is successfully adapted<br />
to grow under such natural conditions (Suh and Ha 1993).<br />
Furthermore, no sterility problem is encountered when it is<br />
crossed with elite cultivars because it is genetically more similar<br />
to the elite cultivar than to wild rice (Suh et al 1997). Tolerance<br />
for low temperature dur<strong>in</strong>g different stages of rice growth<br />
from germ<strong>in</strong>ation to the seedl<strong>in</strong>g stage, early growth, and boot<strong>in</strong>g<br />
and head<strong>in</strong>g stages is an important feature required for<br />
yield <strong>in</strong> cold rice-grow<strong>in</strong>g regions. Particularly <strong>in</strong> direct seed<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>in</strong> the cool part of Korea, germ<strong>in</strong>ation and early growth of<br />
seedl<strong>in</strong>gs take place under relatively low-temperature conditions.<br />
It is thus necessary to improve tolerance for low-temperature<br />
stress of varieties dur<strong>in</strong>g those stages. Molecular<br />
marker technology has facilitated <strong>in</strong>vestigation of the <strong>in</strong>heritance<br />
and identification of QTLs underly<strong>in</strong>g cold tolerance. This<br />
study was conducted to identify and characterize QTLs associated<br />
with cold tolerance us<strong>in</strong>g a backcross population<br />
(Milyang23/ Hapcheonaengmi 3//Milyang23).<br />
Materials and methods<br />
Cold-tolerant japonica weedy accession Hapcheonaengmi 3<br />
was crossed as the male to cold-susceptible Tongil-type variety<br />
Milyang23. F 1 plants were backcrossed to Milyang23.<br />
N<strong>in</strong>ety-eight BC 1 plants were produced and field-grown <strong>in</strong>dividually<br />
to produce BC 1 F 2 seeds for the cold tolerance test:<br />
germ<strong>in</strong>ability at low temperature (15 °C for 30 d), seedl<strong>in</strong>g<br />
height at low temperature (15 °C for 35 d), cold tolerance at<br />
the plumule stage (4 °C for 5 d followed by 30 °C for 5 d), and<br />
cold tolerance at the seedl<strong>in</strong>g stage (5 °C for 3 d followed by<br />
30 °C treatment for 7 d). DNA was extracted from the fresh<br />
leaves of BC 1 plants. The procedures used for the random<br />
amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) and simple sequence<br />
length polymorphism (SSLP) assay were as described <strong>in</strong> Suh<br />
et al (1999) and Panaud et al (1996), respectively. Restriction<br />
fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) genotypes were determ<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
as described <strong>in</strong> Suh et al (1999). The Mapmaker program<br />
was used to establish a molecular map at a m<strong>in</strong>imum<br />
LOD value of 3.0 and map distance was expressed <strong>in</strong> Kosambi<br />
centiMorgans. Statistical analyses were performed us<strong>in</strong>g qGene<br />
and Data Desk 4.0. An LOD score of 2.0 was used as the threshold<br />
for detect<strong>in</strong>g QTL locations <strong>in</strong> the qGene program. The<br />
total phenotypic variance expla<strong>in</strong>ed was estimated by fitt<strong>in</strong>g a<br />
model <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g all putative QTLs for the respective trait simultaneously.<br />
Results and discussion<br />
A total of 162 markers, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g morphological, isozyme,<br />
RFLP, RAPD, and microsatellite markers, were used to construct<br />
a l<strong>in</strong>kage map spann<strong>in</strong>g 1,733 cM, with an average <strong>in</strong>terval<br />
size of 10.7 cM (Fig. 1). The order of SSR markers was<br />
<strong>in</strong> good agreement with that of the map reported by Chen et al<br />
(1997) except that RM208 and RM207, RM7 and RM251,<br />
and OSR28 and OSR29 on chromosomes 2, 3, and 9 showed<br />
cosegregation <strong>in</strong> this population (Fig. 1). Deviation from the<br />
expected 1:1 segregation ratio was significant for the 19 mark-<br />
cM<br />
0<br />
25<br />
50<br />
75<br />
100<br />
125<br />
150<br />
175<br />
200<br />
225<br />
250<br />
275<br />
qLTS-1<br />
1 2 3 4 5 56<br />
OPWO2a<br />
OPU06<br />
RM22* qCTP-4 RM252 OPR06<br />
OSR11<br />
RM231<br />
qLTG-5 RM249<br />
OPNO9<br />
OSR14<br />
RM241<br />
RG13<br />
RM1<br />
qLTS-2<br />
RM233A RG226a*<br />
RM255<br />
OPG07<br />
OPG18<br />
RM211<br />
RG391<br />
OSR15<br />
qLTG-6<br />
OSR08<br />
RM36*<br />
qCTS-6<br />
RM243<br />
OPC06a<br />
RM31<br />
RM7*, RM251*<br />
OPE19c<br />
RM23<br />
RM29*<br />
OPJ18*<br />
RZ744<br />
OPA19<br />
RM16*<br />
RM5<br />
OPQ05*<br />
RM237<br />
OPH07c<br />
OPC06b<br />
OSR31<br />
OPK17<br />
RM221<br />
RG957<br />
OPB07b<br />
OPWO2b<br />
RM250<br />
Pgl 1<br />
OPBO7b<br />
RM208<br />
OPE19e<br />
OPL03<br />
OPBO4<br />
RM207<br />
OSR23<br />
RM50<br />
RM204*<br />
RM217<br />
C<br />
RG226b<br />
OPU09<br />
OPB05<br />
RM3<br />
OPE14<br />
qCTP-7<br />
78 9 10 11 12<br />
RM51<br />
OSR30<br />
RM219<br />
URP4Rb<br />
OSR01<br />
OPE19b<br />
RM25<br />
qLTS-10<br />
RM222<br />
RM20B<br />
RG418<br />
qLTS-9 OPN04a<br />
OPN12b<br />
RG128<br />
OPV07<br />
OPB06<br />
OPC13 qLTG-11 RM167<br />
RM82*<br />
OPG13a<br />
OPC07b<br />
OPC07a<br />
Rc<br />
OPE02c<br />
RM216<br />
OPH07b<br />
OPN12a<br />
OPA08<br />
OPU13<br />
URP4Rc<br />
qCTS-9<br />
OPF01<br />
OPW02c<br />
OPN14<br />
OSR04<br />
RM42<br />
RM257<br />
OPN10a qCTS-11<br />
OPW02e<br />
RM258<br />
OPD08<br />
RM10<br />
RM223<br />
OSR29 qCTP-10<br />
RM202<br />
RM70<br />
OSR07<br />
OSR28<br />
RM228<br />
OPH02a<br />
RM248<br />
OPWO2d<br />
RM215<br />
OPT03<br />
RM206<br />
RZ66<br />
RM245<br />
RM224<br />
RZ404<br />
RM205<br />
OPE07<br />
RM247<br />
OPF16<br />
RG4<br />
RM235<br />
OPE02a<br />
Acp 1<br />
Fig. 1. An <strong>in</strong>tegrated map<br />
based on isozyme, RFLP,<br />
RAPD, and SSLP markers.<br />
Marker identification is <strong>in</strong>dicated<br />
to the right of the columns;<br />
map distance (to the<br />
left of the map) is given <strong>in</strong> cM<br />
(Kosambi function). QTLs are<br />
given at the left side of the<br />
columns. Skewed markers<br />
(P
Frequency<br />
(Mean ± SD)<br />
Milyang23: (15 ± 1.3)<br />
Hapcheonaengmi 3: (49 ± 8.2)<br />
BC<br />
20 1 F 1 population: (53.3 ± 24.4)<br />
15<br />
10<br />
5<br />
0 5 25 45 65 85<br />
15 35 55 75<br />
Germ<strong>in</strong>ability (%)<br />
20<br />
15<br />
10<br />
5<br />
0<br />
(Mean ± SD)<br />
Milyang23: (2.3 ± 0.1)<br />
Hapcheonaengmi 3: (7.2 ± 0.6)<br />
BC 1 F 1 population: (4.5 ± 1.2)<br />
95<br />
2.5 3.5 4.5 5.5 6.5<br />
3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0<br />
Seedl<strong>in</strong>g elongation (cm)<br />
50<br />
40<br />
30<br />
20<br />
10<br />
0<br />
(Mean ± SD)<br />
Milyang23: (4.5 ± 0.3)<br />
Hapcheonaengmi 3: (1.1 ± 0.1)<br />
BC 1 F 1 population: (3.6 ± 0.8)<br />
0.5 1.5 2.5 3.5 4.5<br />
Plumule cold tolerance (ºC)<br />
25<br />
20<br />
15<br />
10<br />
5<br />
0<br />
(Mean ± SD)<br />
Milyang23: (8.6 ± 0.5)<br />
Hapcheonaengmi 3: (1.6 ± 0.7)<br />
BC 1 F 1 population: (5.7 ± 2.0)<br />
0.5 2.5 4.5 6.5 8.5<br />
1.5 3.5 5.5 7.5 7.0<br />
Seedl<strong>in</strong>g cold tolerance (ºC)<br />
Fig. 2. Frequency distributions of cold<br />
tolerance–related traits <strong>in</strong> the BC 1<br />
population. The value on the x-axis is<br />
the mid-value of each group.<br />
ers, and 15 and 4 were skewed <strong>in</strong> favor of Milyang23 and<br />
Hapcheonaengmi 3 alleles, respectively (Fig. 1).<br />
Figure 2 shows the frequency distribution of phenotypes<br />
for four traits <strong>in</strong> the BC 1 F 2 families. Distribution of four traits<br />
of the BC 1 F 2 l<strong>in</strong>es was <strong>in</strong>termediate between that of parental<br />
varieties except for low-temperature germ<strong>in</strong>ability. Transgressive<br />
segregants were observed for germ<strong>in</strong>ability at low temperature.<br />
Sixty percent of the BC 1 F 2 families outperformed<br />
Hapcheonaengmi 3 <strong>in</strong> germ<strong>in</strong>ability at low temperature.<br />
Three putative QTLs affect<strong>in</strong>g germ<strong>in</strong>ability at low temperature<br />
were detected on chromosomes 5, 6, and 11. Phenotypic<br />
variation expla<strong>in</strong>ed by the <strong>in</strong>dividual QTLs ranged from<br />
11.4% to 18.6%, or 37.9% of the total phenotypic variation <strong>in</strong><br />
the backcross population. The Hapcheonaengmi 3 allele decreased<br />
the germ<strong>in</strong>ation rate at the QTL on chromosome 6.<br />
No significant <strong>in</strong>teractions among three QTLs were observed.<br />
Four putative QTLs affect<strong>in</strong>g seedl<strong>in</strong>g height at low temperature<br />
were detected on chromosomes 1, 2, 9, and 10. Phenotypic<br />
variation expla<strong>in</strong>ed by the <strong>in</strong>dividual QTLs ranged from<br />
9.3% to 14.6%, or 38.1% of the total phenotypic variation.<br />
Three putative QTLs affect<strong>in</strong>g plumule cold tolerance were<br />
detected on chromosomes 4, 7, and 10. Phenotypic variation<br />
expla<strong>in</strong>ed by the <strong>in</strong>dividual QTLs ranged from 9.5% to 17.0%,<br />
or 31.8% of the total phenotypic variation. Three QTLs affect<strong>in</strong>g<br />
seedl<strong>in</strong>g cold tolerance were detected on chromosomes<br />
6, 9, and 11, account<strong>in</strong>g for 33.6% of the total phenotypic variation,<br />
with each QTL expla<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g from 10.2% to 18.2%.<br />
This study identified a m<strong>in</strong>imum of 13 significant QTLs<br />
for four traits, with three to four QTLs per trait. The direction<br />
of the additive gene effect co<strong>in</strong>cided with that predicted by the<br />
phenotypes of the parents, except for one on chromosome 6<br />
related to germ<strong>in</strong>ability at low temperature. This f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g demonstrates<br />
the ability of marker analysis to uncover cryptic genetic<br />
variation that otherwise would have been masked by the<br />
large differences between parents. A similar trend has been<br />
reported for many other traits <strong>in</strong> various species (de Vicente<br />
and Tanksley 1993, Xiao et al 1998). The presence of favorable<br />
QTL alleles <strong>in</strong> both parents offers a good opportunity for<br />
recover<strong>in</strong>g transgressive segregants and provides a new comb<strong>in</strong>ation<br />
of novel alleles for breed<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
The QTLs underly<strong>in</strong>g low-temperature germ<strong>in</strong>ability and<br />
cold tolerance at the early growth stage identified <strong>in</strong> this study<br />
would be useful for select<strong>in</strong>g l<strong>in</strong>es with enhanced germ<strong>in</strong>ability<br />
and cold tolerance at low temperatures.<br />
References<br />
Chen X, Temnykh S, Xu Y, Cho YG, McCouch SR. 1997. Development<br />
of a microsatellite framework map provid<strong>in</strong>g genomewide<br />
coverage <strong>in</strong> rice (Oryza sativa L.). Theor. Appl. Genet.<br />
95:553-567.<br />
de Vicente MC, Tanksley SD. 1993. QTL analysis of transgressive<br />
segregation <strong>in</strong> an <strong>in</strong>terspecific tomato cross. <strong>Genetics</strong> 143:585-<br />
596.<br />
Panaud O, Chen X, McCouch SR. 1996. Development of<br />
microsatellite markers and characterization of simple sequence<br />
length polymorphism (SSLP) <strong>in</strong> rice (Oryza sativa L.). Mol.<br />
Gen. Genet. 252:597-607.<br />
Suh HS, Ha WG. 1993. Collection and evaluation of Korean red<br />
rices. V. Germ<strong>in</strong>ation characteristics on different water and<br />
soil depth. Korean J. Crop Sci. 38(2):128-133.<br />
Suh HS, Sato YI, Morishima H. 1997. Genetic characterization of<br />
weedy rice (Oryza sativa L.) based on morphophysiology,<br />
isozymes and RAPD markers. Theor. Appl. Genet. 94:316-<br />
321.<br />
Molecular markers, QTL mapp<strong>in</strong>g, and marker-assisted selection 293
Suh JP, Ahn SN, Moon HP, Suh HS. 1999. QTL analysis of low<br />
temperature germ<strong>in</strong>ability <strong>in</strong> a weedy rice. Korean J. Breed.<br />
31(3):261-267.<br />
Xiao J, Li J, Grandillo SG, Ahn SN, Yuan L, Tanksley SD, McCouch<br />
SR. 1998. Identification of trait-improv<strong>in</strong>g quantitative trait<br />
loci alleles from a wild rice relative, Oryza rufipogon. <strong>Genetics</strong><br />
150:899-909.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ addresses: J.P Suh, H.S. Suh Department of Agronomy,<br />
Yeungnam University, Kyongsan 712-749; S.N. Ahn, Department<br />
of Agronomy, Chungnam National University, Taejon<br />
305-333; H.P. Moon, National Yeongnam Agricultural Experiment<br />
Station, RDA, Milyang 627-130; H.C. Choi, National<br />
Crop Experiment Station, RDA, Suwon 441-100, Korea.<br />
Mapp<strong>in</strong>g QTLs for salt tolerance <strong>in</strong> rice<br />
Nguyen Thi Lang, S. Masood, S. Yanagihara, and Bui Chi Buu<br />
One hundred eight F 8<br />
recomb<strong>in</strong>ant <strong>in</strong>bred l<strong>in</strong>es (RILs) derived from the cross Tesanai 2/CB were evaluated. These RILs were<br />
evaluated for seedl<strong>in</strong>g survival day (SD), dry root weight (Rt.wt), dry shoot weight (St.wt), Na + and K + content, and Na + /K + ratio<br />
<strong>in</strong> culture solution (EC = 12 dS m –1 ). A l<strong>in</strong>kage map was constructed us<strong>in</strong>g 108 RFLP markers and SSR markers cover<strong>in</strong>g<br />
2,340.50 cM, with an average <strong>in</strong>terval of 21.68 cM between marker loci. Markers associated with salt tolerance were located<br />
on chromosomes 1, 2, 3, 9, 11, and 12. Several QTLs were identified: four for SD, one for dry shoot weight, two for dry root<br />
weight, one for Na + absorption, one for K + absorption, and four for Na + /K + ratio. The proportion of phenotypic variation<br />
expla<strong>in</strong>ed by each QTL ranged from 5.2% to 11.6% for SD, and from 4.8% to 14.4% for morphological characters and Na + and<br />
K + accumulation. Common QTLs were observed on chromosomes 3 and 9 for quantitative traits (SD and Rt.wt, and SD and<br />
Na + /K + ). Common QTLs were also detected on chromosome 12 for Na + /K + and K + content.<br />
Salt-tolerant varieties have generally been considered as the<br />
most economical and effective way of <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g crop production<br />
<strong>in</strong> sal<strong>in</strong>e soils. Efforts have been made to identify a parameter<br />
that could be used as the criterion for mass screen<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
Parameters generally proposed are leaf <strong>in</strong>jury rate at the seedl<strong>in</strong>g<br />
stage, sterility after head<strong>in</strong>g, and Na + /K + ratio <strong>in</strong> the shoots<br />
under sal<strong>in</strong>e conditions (Buu et al 1995). Selection efficiency<br />
for sal<strong>in</strong>ity tolerance under field conditions rema<strong>in</strong>s very low<br />
because of stress of heterogeneity and the presence of other<br />
soil-related stresses. Two or more genes (quantitative) govern<br />
salt tolerance that significantly <strong>in</strong>teract with the environment.<br />
Recent technical DNA marker technology has led to the molecular<br />
dissection of complex traits. Us<strong>in</strong>g an F 6 recomb<strong>in</strong>ant<br />
<strong>in</strong>bred l<strong>in</strong>e (RIL) population from the cross Tesanai 2/CB, one<br />
QTL from the trait survival day for salt tolerance was detected<br />
on chromosome 5 (L<strong>in</strong> 1995). Another QTL was also detected<br />
on chromosome 10 for salt tolerance <strong>in</strong> the same cross (Shahid<br />
1997).<br />
We <strong>in</strong>vestigated the genetic basis of sal<strong>in</strong>ity tolerance<br />
and mapped QTLs for salt tolerance us<strong>in</strong>g microsatellite and<br />
restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) markers <strong>in</strong><br />
RILs produced from a cross between Tesanai 2 from Ch<strong>in</strong>a<br />
and CB from the United States.<br />
Materials and methods<br />
F 8 RILs developed through s<strong>in</strong>gle-seed descent (SSD) us<strong>in</strong>g<br />
the rapid generation advance (RGA) method were used to map<br />
salt tolerance <strong>in</strong> rice. The population of 108 RILs was derived<br />
from a cross between Tesanai 2 from Ch<strong>in</strong>a and CB from the<br />
U.S.<br />
Sterilized seeds were placed <strong>in</strong> petri dishes with moistened<br />
filter papers and <strong>in</strong>cubated at 30 °C for 48 h to germ<strong>in</strong>ate.<br />
Two pregerm<strong>in</strong>ated seeds per hole on the styrofoam seedl<strong>in</strong>g<br />
float were selected. Three days after seedl<strong>in</strong>gs were well<br />
established, distilled water was replaced by sal<strong>in</strong>ization nutrient<br />
solution (Yoshida et al 1976). Initial sal<strong>in</strong>ity was at EC = 6<br />
dS m –1 . Three days later, sal<strong>in</strong>ity was <strong>in</strong>creased to 12 dS m –1<br />
by add<strong>in</strong>g NaCl to the nutrient solution. The solution was renewed<br />
every 8 d and pH was ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed at 5.0 daily. A seedl<strong>in</strong>g<br />
that was completely yellow with no green tissue evident<br />
was considered dead. Plant survival day was recorded <strong>in</strong> days<br />
from seed<strong>in</strong>g to death.<br />
Shoot and root samples were collected after 2 wk of sal<strong>in</strong>ization,<br />
dried at 70 °C for 2 d, and weighed. Each plant sample<br />
was ground <strong>in</strong> a mortar with 25 mL of 1N HCl and left to stand<br />
at room temperature for 24 h, then briefly shaken and filtered.<br />
K + and Na + standards were prepared by dilution from the 1,000-<br />
ppm stock solution accord<strong>in</strong>g to standard procedures (Yoshida<br />
et al 1976). Na + and K + were determ<strong>in</strong>ed by atomic absorption<br />
spectrophotometer.<br />
Five grams of leaf tissue were ground <strong>in</strong> liquid nitrogen,<br />
then a 20-mL extraction buffer was added and vigorously<br />
mixed. DNA check<strong>in</strong>g for quality and concentration was undertaken<br />
by restriction digestion with EcoRI. The mixture was<br />
then electrophoresed <strong>in</strong> agarose gel with standard DNA.<br />
Genomic DNA was digested with EcoRI, EcoRIV, and<br />
H<strong>in</strong>dIII overnight, and then electrophoresed on 0.8% agarose<br />
294 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
gel. Southern blott<strong>in</strong>g was carried out to transfer digested DNA<br />
onto a Hybond N + membrane. The probes were amplified by<br />
PCR and labeled with HRP (horseradish peroxidase) by us<strong>in</strong>g<br />
the ECL direct nucleic acid-label<strong>in</strong>g and detection systems kit<br />
(Amersham Life Science). The membranes were hybridized<br />
with HRP-labeled probes, detected by chemilum<strong>in</strong>escence, and<br />
autoradiographed on X-ray film for 2 h.<br />
PCR amplification was performed <strong>in</strong> 10 mM Tris-HCl<br />
(pH 8.3), 50 mM KCl, 1.5 mM MgCl 2 , 1 unit of TAKARA<br />
Taq, 4 nmol dNTP, 10 pmol primer, with 30 ng genomic DNA<br />
per 25 µL us<strong>in</strong>g a thermal cycler 9600 (Perk<strong>in</strong>-Elmer). The<br />
PCRs were denatured at 95 °C for 4 m<strong>in</strong>, followed by 35 cycles<br />
of 94 °C for 45 sec, 55 °C for 30 sec, and 72 °C for 60 sec. The<br />
f<strong>in</strong>al extension was at 72 °C for 5 m<strong>in</strong>. After PCR, 13 µL of<br />
load<strong>in</strong>g buffer (98% formamide, 10 mm EDTA, 0.025% bromophenol<br />
blue, and 0.025% xylene cyanol) were added. Polymorphisms<br />
<strong>in</strong> the PCR products were detected by ethidium<br />
bromide sta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g after electrophoresis on 5% agarose gel.<br />
The program MapMaker was used to establish the<br />
microsatellite and RFLP map. Marker order and map distances<br />
were derived us<strong>in</strong>g the RI algorithm of MapMaker version 3.0.<br />
Map distances were estimated us<strong>in</strong>g the Kosambi function<br />
(Kosambi 1944). L<strong>in</strong>kage group was reconfirmed us<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
group command with an LOD score of 3.0 and recomb<strong>in</strong>ation<br />
fraction = 0.4. Ripple command was used to verify the order<br />
of the marker on each chromosome.<br />
QTL analysis was performed with the software package<br />
Q-gene 1994 from Cornell University and MapL from Japan.<br />
Q-gene was used to f<strong>in</strong>d the location of major and m<strong>in</strong>or genes.<br />
QTL detection was performed by s<strong>in</strong>gle-marker analysis (SMA)<br />
and <strong>in</strong>terval mapp<strong>in</strong>g (IM). One-way analysis of variance<br />
(ANOVA) was performed for each s<strong>in</strong>gle marker and each<br />
comb<strong>in</strong>ation of two markers to be identified as putatively associated<br />
with salt tolerance (this was done to confirm the association<br />
between the marker and salt tolerance loci). The<br />
threshold for declar<strong>in</strong>g a QTL for sal<strong>in</strong>ity tolerance was<br />
LOD>3. All markers were tested for the expected 1:1 ratio. To<br />
identify the mode of <strong>in</strong>heritance, reexam<strong>in</strong>ation of putative<br />
QTL regions was carried out by three genetic components—<br />
dom<strong>in</strong>ant, recessive, and additive—with Q-gene software.<br />
Likelihood ratios (LRs) were calculated at 1-cM <strong>in</strong>tervals along<br />
the mapped genome. The proportion of phenotypic variation<br />
expla<strong>in</strong>ed by the significant marker was estimated as a coefficient<br />
of determ<strong>in</strong>ation (R 2 ) for the s<strong>in</strong>gle-locus model.<br />
Results and discussion<br />
Figure 1 shows that the distribution of phenotypic sal<strong>in</strong>ity reaction<br />
among the RILs was cont<strong>in</strong>uous, <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g a good recomb<strong>in</strong>ation<br />
for sal<strong>in</strong>ity reaction <strong>in</strong> the population. For dry<br />
shoot weight (St.wt) and dry root weight (Rt.wt), large differences<br />
were noted <strong>in</strong> the population. St.wt ranged from 45 to<br />
110 mg and from 200 to 350 mg for Rt.wt.<br />
Tolerant rice cultivars decreased Na + toxicity by ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />
a high level of K + . Sal<strong>in</strong>ity tolerance (low Na + /K + ratio<br />
<strong>in</strong> the shoot) is governed by both additive and dom<strong>in</strong>ant gene<br />
effects (Gregorio and Senadhira 1993). The trait exhibited overdom<strong>in</strong>ance<br />
and is controlled by at least two groups of genes<br />
that exhibit dom<strong>in</strong>ance. The first group may control Na + exclusion<br />
and the other K + absorption. The Na + /K + ratio <strong>in</strong> the<br />
shoot of the tolerant genotypes was greater than <strong>in</strong> the sensitive<br />
genotypes under sal<strong>in</strong>ization. Tesanai 2 (tolerant parent)<br />
ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed a higher level of K + than CB (susceptible) and the<br />
Na + /K + ratio <strong>in</strong> the shoot of Tesanai 2 was greater than <strong>in</strong> CB.<br />
Seventy-four RFLP markers showed polymorphism between<br />
the two parents. Fourteen simple sequence repeat (SSR)<br />
primers showed no amplification, whereas 26 were monomorphic.<br />
Among 31 polymorphic SSR markers, 35% were from<br />
CB and the other 65% were from Tesanai 2. Amplified fragments<br />
ranged <strong>in</strong> size from 95 to 220 bp for all primers used <strong>in</strong><br />
the analysis.<br />
Of the 74 markers surveyed, 42 marker loci (56.75%)<br />
significantly deviated from the 1:1 segregation ratio. All these<br />
markers showed deviation toward Tesanai 2 alleles, with the<br />
exception of one marker on chromosome 12 that deviated toward<br />
CB alleles. Among 32 other markers that were not significantly<br />
deviated, 26 loci (81.25%) were skewed <strong>in</strong> favor of<br />
the Tesanai 2 allele, whereas 18.8% were skewed <strong>in</strong> favor of<br />
CB alleles.<br />
Genomic DNA from the 108 F 8 RILs of the cross between<br />
the salt-tolerant (Tesanai 2) and susceptible (CB) varieties<br />
was amplified with 31 primers, and band<strong>in</strong>g patterns were<br />
scored with reference to those of the parents. Band<strong>in</strong>g patterns<br />
of F 8 <strong>in</strong>dividuals could be classified either as homozygous<br />
for the Tesanai 2-type marker or homozygote for the CBtype<br />
marker. Among the SSR bands scored, 65% orig<strong>in</strong>ated<br />
from Tesanai 2, whereas 35% were from CB. Most of the markers<br />
followed Mendelian segregation. From these markers, 13<br />
were biased toward CB and 14 toward Tesanai 2.<br />
L<strong>in</strong>kage analysis was performed with microsatellite and<br />
RFLP mapp<strong>in</strong>g data us<strong>in</strong>g MapMaker version 3.0.<br />
A molecular map was constructed accord<strong>in</strong>g to published<br />
microsatellites from Cornell University and RFLPs from Japan.<br />
Figure 1 shows the l<strong>in</strong>kage map for 74 RFLP and 31 SSR<br />
markers.<br />
Table 1 shows the results of one-way ANOVA. The association<br />
among the <strong>in</strong>dices of survival days of C711, C1454,<br />
R3156, R1751, C560, C747, R26, and C178 was significant<br />
(P
33.0<br />
16.5<br />
9.0<br />
6.9<br />
28.8<br />
13.6<br />
7.7<br />
19.8<br />
1.6<br />
19.5<br />
25.9<br />
48.8<br />
64.1<br />
(1) RM212<br />
(2) C86<br />
(3) R2417<br />
(4) C1370<br />
(5) RM237<br />
(6) C955<br />
(7) C178<br />
(8) R210<br />
(9) RM220<br />
(10) RM81A<br />
(11) RM24<br />
(12) C122<br />
(13) C970<br />
(14) C112<br />
45.3<br />
0.5<br />
60.8<br />
15.7<br />
11.9<br />
68.1<br />
7.2<br />
39.2<br />
2.8<br />
2.8<br />
9.4<br />
49.8<br />
(15) RM240<br />
(16) R1843<br />
(17) R2510<br />
(18) R26<br />
(19) C560<br />
(20) C747<br />
(21) RM211<br />
(22) RM233<br />
(23) RM234<br />
(24) RM207<br />
(25) RM208<br />
(26) RM213<br />
43.0<br />
4.0<br />
48.4<br />
9.4<br />
14.5<br />
38.2<br />
16.3<br />
13.6<br />
5.3<br />
33.1<br />
Chr 3<br />
(28) C1488<br />
(29) RM227<br />
(30) RM231<br />
(31) R250<br />
(32) C746<br />
(33) R19<br />
(34) C515<br />
(35) R2170<br />
(36) C63<br />
(37) C563<br />
(38) R3156<br />
58.2<br />
36.8<br />
33.1<br />
25.7<br />
Chr 4<br />
(39) C891<br />
(40) R2373<br />
(41) C734<br />
(42) C445<br />
(43) C1016<br />
Chr 1<br />
(27) G227<br />
Chr 2<br />
36.7<br />
9.0<br />
12.0<br />
51.6<br />
Chr 5<br />
(44) R521<br />
(45) R2558<br />
(46) R372<br />
(47) R2289<br />
(48) RM31<br />
12.6<br />
7.7<br />
32.6<br />
20.1<br />
19.0<br />
17.8<br />
37.7<br />
18.3<br />
Chr 6<br />
(49) R2147<br />
(50) R2171<br />
(51) R2123<br />
(52) R1962<br />
(53) RM225<br />
(54) RM217<br />
(55) RM204<br />
(56) C358<br />
(57) R1167<br />
32.6<br />
13.9<br />
17.1<br />
37.7<br />
2.7<br />
Chr 7<br />
(58) C39<br />
(59) R3089<br />
(60) R1440<br />
(61) RM214<br />
(62) R1789<br />
(63) C596<br />
12.6<br />
27.5<br />
36.3<br />
10.2<br />
27.0<br />
11.3<br />
2.1<br />
54.0<br />
Chr 8<br />
(64) RM25<br />
(65) RM223<br />
(66) RM210<br />
(67) C347<br />
(68) G1073<br />
(69) R2662<br />
(70) R1963<br />
(71) C1121<br />
(72) R902<br />
22.1<br />
18.4<br />
11.2<br />
12.1<br />
14.5<br />
39.9<br />
19.5<br />
16.1<br />
8.4<br />
16.2<br />
Chr 9<br />
Surviv<strong>in</strong>g days)<br />
Na +<br />
(73) C506<br />
(74) RM215<br />
(75) RM201<br />
(76) RM205<br />
(77) RM219<br />
(78) RM242<br />
(79) C711<br />
(80) C1454<br />
(81) C397<br />
(82) R1751<br />
(83) R2638<br />
Shoot wt.<br />
K +<br />
42.9<br />
51.3<br />
44.1<br />
18.2<br />
Root wt.<br />
Na + /K + ratio<br />
Chr 10<br />
(84) RM216<br />
(85) R2174<br />
(86) RM228<br />
(87) R716<br />
(88) C1286<br />
58.9<br />
36.8<br />
27.5<br />
34.5<br />
19.1<br />
30.2<br />
11.6<br />
16.4<br />
23.6<br />
5.0<br />
(89) R728<br />
(90) RM224<br />
(91) RM202<br />
(92) RM206<br />
(93) RM209<br />
(94) G257<br />
(95) G320<br />
(96) C535<br />
(97) C477<br />
(98)<br />
(99)<br />
C1506<br />
C950<br />
14.9<br />
3.3<br />
5.0<br />
12.3<br />
87.5<br />
11.3<br />
28.1<br />
Chr 12<br />
(101) RM235<br />
(102) C901<br />
(103) C443<br />
(104) R1684<br />
(105) G24<br />
(106) R3375<br />
(107) G2140<br />
(108) R642<br />
50.3<br />
(100) C50<br />
Fig. 1. QTLs mapped for sal<strong>in</strong>ity tolerance of related traits from F 8 RILs from a cross between Tesanai 2 (salt-tolerant) and CB (saltsensitive).<br />
Chr 11<br />
296 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
Table 1. QTLs identified by s<strong>in</strong>gle-marker analysis for seedl<strong>in</strong>g survival after salt stress.<br />
Marker Chromosome Group Allelic F- P- R 2 DPE a<br />
mean ± SE value value (%)<br />
C711 9 P1 28.79 ± 0.26 7.54 0.0080 11.5 T<br />
P2 25.64 ± 0.77<br />
C1454 9 P1 28.79 ± 0.36 5.53 0.0235 11.6 T<br />
P2 23.22 ± 0.00<br />
R3156 3 P1 28.30 ± 0.28 5.30 0.0250 8.5 C<br />
P2 30.90 ± 1.21<br />
R1751 9 P1 28.92 ± 0.28 5.60 0.0277 6.9 T<br />
P2 27.63 ± 0.60<br />
C560 2 P1 28.38 ± 0.25 4.92 0.0298 6.6 C<br />
P2 31.60 ± 1.56<br />
C747 2 P1 28.22 ± 0.30 4.38 0.0402 6.1 C<br />
P2 29.60 ± 0.60<br />
R26 2 P1 28.46 ± 0.25 4.12 0.0450 5.2 C<br />
P2 31.06 ± 1.60<br />
C178 1 P1 28.84 ± 0.26 3.98 0.0500 5.8 T<br />
P2 26.66 ± 1.61<br />
a DPE = direction of phenotypic effect; <strong>in</strong>dicates whether the parent alleles appear to <strong>in</strong>crease the trait. T = Tesanai 2, C =<br />
CB. R 2 <strong>in</strong> ANOVA.<br />
Table 2. QTLs identified by s<strong>in</strong>gle-marker analysis for sal<strong>in</strong>ity-tolerance-related traits (St.wt, Rt.wt, Na + , K + ,<br />
Na + /K + ratio) <strong>in</strong> rice.<br />
Trait Marker Chromosome Group Allelic F- P- R 2 DPE a<br />
mean ± SE value value (%)<br />
St.wt RM209 11 P1 284.5 ± 6.53 9.24 0.0036 14.38 T<br />
P2 220.0 ± 8.54<br />
R3156 3 P1 72.4 ± 2.04 5.87 0.018 9.34 C<br />
P2 92.0 ± 4.98<br />
Rt.wt C563 3 P1 73.0 ± 1.86 5.23 0.025 6.95 C<br />
P2 87.5 ± 5.34<br />
C397 9 P1 77.3 ± 2.04 4.00 0.050 6.35 T<br />
P2 61.8 ± 2.60<br />
RM240 2 P1 0.43 ± 0.01 5.21 0.025 7.22 C<br />
Na + P2 0.48 ± 0.01<br />
R1167 6 P1 0.44 ± 0.01 3.68 0.050 4.35 C<br />
P2 0.55 ± 0.01<br />
K + G24 12 P1 0.73 ± 0.02 10.57 0.002 17.45 C<br />
P2 0.97 ± 0.11<br />
C86 1 P1 0.57 ± 0.02 5.03 0.029 9.14 C<br />
P2 0.73 ± 0.04<br />
G24 12 P1 0.61 ± 0.02 4.83 0.032 8.81 T<br />
Na + /K + P2 0.45 ± 0.07<br />
RM214 7 P1 0.59 ± 0.02 3.86 0.050 5.86 C<br />
P2 0.81 ± 0.06<br />
C747 2 P1 0.62 ± 0.02 3.71 0.050 5.25 T<br />
P2 0.54 ± 0.04<br />
a DPE = direction of phenotypic effect; <strong>in</strong>dicates whether the parent alleles appear to <strong>in</strong>crease the trait. T = Tesanai 2, C = CB. R 2 <strong>in</strong><br />
ANOVA.<br />
dry shoot weight. The observed phenotypic variation expla<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
14.37% on chromosome 11. Compared with <strong>in</strong>terval analysis,<br />
only one significant <strong>in</strong>teraction was detected between RM209<br />
and RM206. The alleles from Tesanai 2 showed an <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong><br />
dry shoot weight.<br />
Three markers—R3156, C563, and C397—were detected<br />
to be l<strong>in</strong>ked to root weight on chromosomes 3 and 9.<br />
They expla<strong>in</strong>ed 9.34%, 6.95%, and 6.35% of the phenotypic<br />
variation, respectively. Interval analysis was simultaneously<br />
analyzed for effect on quantitative traits. Overlapp<strong>in</strong>g significant<br />
markers for Rt.wt were found on chromosome 3 (Table<br />
2).<br />
One-way ANOVA demonstrated that RM240 (chr. 2) and<br />
R1167 (chr. 6) were l<strong>in</strong>ked to the quantitative loci associated<br />
with Na + absorption (Table 2). For Na + absorption, the markers<br />
expla<strong>in</strong>ed 7.22%, and 4.35% of the phenotypic variation,<br />
Molecular markers, QTL mapp<strong>in</strong>g, and marker-assisted selection 297
espectively. However, only one significant <strong>in</strong>teraction was<br />
detected between RM240 and R1843 <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>terval analysis. The<br />
alleles from CB showed an <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> Na + .<br />
For K + absorption, one QTL was detected on chromosome<br />
12, which expla<strong>in</strong>s 17.45% of the phenotypic variation.<br />
The alleles from CB showed an <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> K + .<br />
Four QTLs were located on chromosomes 1, 2, 7, and<br />
12, which expla<strong>in</strong>ed 9.1%, 5.2%, 5.9%, and 8.8% of the phenotypic<br />
variation, respectively. The allele from CB showed an<br />
<strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> Na + /K + on chromosomes 1 and 7, whereas alleles<br />
from Tesanai 2 were located on chromosomes 2 and 12. Common<br />
QTLs were observed on chromosomes 3 and 9 for three<br />
quantitative traits (SD, Rt.wt, and Na + /K + ). Common QTLs<br />
were also detected on chromosome 12 for Na + /K + and K + .<br />
On the basis of the QTLs for sal<strong>in</strong>ity tolerance exclud<strong>in</strong>g<br />
the major gene on chromosomes 1, 2, 3, and 9, there was<br />
<strong>in</strong>dependent <strong>in</strong>heritance of St.wt, Rt.wt, Na + , K + , and Na + /K +<br />
ratio <strong>in</strong> the shoot. The <strong>in</strong>terval analysis and s<strong>in</strong>gle-marker analysis<br />
used <strong>in</strong> detect<strong>in</strong>g the QTLs showed the same results. Four<br />
QTLs were identified for SD, one QTL for dry shoot weight,<br />
two QTLs for dry root weight, one QTL for Na + absorption,<br />
one QTL for K + absorption, and four QTLs for Na + /K + ratio.<br />
These QTLs were located on chromosomes 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 9, 11,<br />
and 12. Common QTLs were observed on chromosomes 3 and<br />
9 for quantitative traits (SD, Rt.wt, and Na + /K + ). Common<br />
QTLs were also detected on chromosome 12 for Na + /K + and<br />
K + . On this map, QTLs were detected at an <strong>in</strong>terval of >30 cM<br />
such as for Na + /K + ratio on chromosomes 1 and 7 and Na + on<br />
chromosome 2. The genes tagged for salt tolerance <strong>in</strong> this study<br />
can be used as anchor po<strong>in</strong>ts to <strong>in</strong>vestigate the mechanisms of<br />
salt tolerance <strong>in</strong> Tesanai 2.<br />
Three microsatellite loci were tightly detected m<strong>in</strong>or<br />
genes for sal<strong>in</strong>ity tolerance: RM209 (chr. 11), RM240 (chr.<br />
2), and RM214 (chr. 1). The ability to detect the tight l<strong>in</strong>kage<br />
between markers and salt-tolerance genes depends on the number<br />
of mapped markers that are available for rice. Salt-tolerance<br />
genes associated with seedl<strong>in</strong>g survival under sal<strong>in</strong>e conditions<br />
provide a start<strong>in</strong>g po<strong>in</strong>t for exam<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the effects of<br />
these genes <strong>in</strong> rice.<br />
References<br />
Buu BC, Lang NT, Tao PB, Bay ND. 1995. <strong>Rice</strong> breed<strong>in</strong>g research<br />
strategy <strong>in</strong> the Mekong Delta. In: Fragile lives <strong>in</strong> fragile ecosystems.<br />
Manila (Philipp<strong>in</strong>es): <strong>International</strong> <strong>Rice</strong> Research<br />
Institute. p 739-755.<br />
Gregorio GB, Senadhira D. 1993. Genetic analysis of sal<strong>in</strong>ity tolerance<br />
<strong>in</strong> rice. Theor. Appl. Genet. 86:333-338.<br />
Kosambi DD. 1944. The estimation of map distances from recomb<strong>in</strong>ation<br />
values. Ann. Engen. 12:172-175.<br />
L<strong>in</strong> Hong Xuan. 1995. Mapp<strong>in</strong>g of QTL for salt tolerance <strong>in</strong> rice<br />
(Oryza sativa L.) via molecular markers. Ok<strong>in</strong>awa Subtropical<br />
Station, JIRCAS 4:240-265.<br />
Shahid Masood M. 1997. Identification and evaluation of sal<strong>in</strong>ity<br />
tolerance <strong>in</strong> rice (Oryza sativa L.) us<strong>in</strong>g molecular markers.<br />
Ok<strong>in</strong>awa Subtropical Station, JIRCAS 6:121-135.<br />
Yoshida S, Forno DA, Cook JH, Gomez KA. 1976. Laboratory<br />
manual for physiological studies of rice. 3 rd ed. Los Baños<br />
(Philipp<strong>in</strong>es): <strong>International</strong> <strong>Rice</strong> Research Institute.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ addresses: Nguyen Thi Lang, Bui Chi Buu, Cuu Long Delta<br />
<strong>Rice</strong> Research Institute, Vietnam; S. Masood and S.<br />
Yanagihara, Ok<strong>in</strong>awa Subtropical Station, JIRCAS, Japan.<br />
Quantitative trait loci analysis of alum<strong>in</strong>um tolerance <strong>in</strong> rice<br />
V.T. Nguyen, H.T. Nguyen, B.T. Le, T.D. Le, and A.H. Paterson<br />
<strong>Rice</strong> cultivars grown on acid soil commonly suffer a serious yield reduction because of alum<strong>in</strong>um (Al) toxicity. A rapid nutrient<br />
solution screen<strong>in</strong>g method was used to test 11 rice genotypes for Al tolerance. <strong>Rice</strong> seedl<strong>in</strong>gs were grown <strong>in</strong> a laboratory under<br />
0 ppm Al and eight differential levels of stress treatment. Relative root length (RR) of 10-d-old plants was used as an <strong>in</strong>dex of<br />
Al tolerance. Alum<strong>in</strong>um tolerance among 11 rice genotypes was determ<strong>in</strong>ed and three major groups were identified: (1) the<br />
highest alum<strong>in</strong>um tolerance group <strong>in</strong>cludes CT9993 and Nipponbare; (2) the <strong>in</strong>termediate alum<strong>in</strong>um tolerance group consists<br />
of Moroberekan, Azucena, Chiembau, and Ca Dung Do; and (3) the susceptible group <strong>in</strong>cludes IR20, IR64, Omon 269-65,<br />
Pokkali, and IR62266. A population derived from the cross between Chiembau and Omon 269-65 varieties is <strong>in</strong>dica, but it<br />
shows a relatively high level of DNA polymorphism. A total of 164 markers were used for l<strong>in</strong>kage map construction. The 1,715-<br />
cM l<strong>in</strong>kage map cover<strong>in</strong>g the whole rice genome was used for QTL analysis. A total of n<strong>in</strong>e different genomic regions on eight<br />
chromosomes has been implicated <strong>in</strong> the genetic control of root and shoot growth under alum<strong>in</strong>um stress. The greatest effects<br />
on alum<strong>in</strong>um tolerance were associated with the genomic region near WG110 (RG109–WG110 <strong>in</strong>terval) on chromosome 1.<br />
This major QTL for Al tolerance was found to be consistent among rice mapp<strong>in</strong>g populations.<br />
298 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
Alum<strong>in</strong>um (Al) toxicity is the most important factor that limits<br />
crop productivity <strong>in</strong> many areas of the world, particularly <strong>in</strong><br />
acid upland and lowland acid-sulfate soils. Toxic concentrations<br />
of Al are usually found <strong>in</strong> acid soils at pH 5 and below.<br />
Alum<strong>in</strong>um affects many physiological, biochemical, and metabolic<br />
processes <strong>in</strong> plants. The <strong>in</strong>itial and most dramatic symptom<br />
of Al toxicity is <strong>in</strong>hibition of root elongation as a consequence<br />
of root apex disruption. Al toxicity can <strong>in</strong>hibit shoot<br />
growth by limit<strong>in</strong>g the supply of nutrients and water because<br />
of poor subsoil penetration or lower root hydraulic conductivity.<br />
Shoot growth is also affected by Al toxicity and, <strong>in</strong> longer<br />
duration experiments, has been used as an <strong>in</strong>dex of tolerance.<br />
A diallel analysis us<strong>in</strong>g tolerant varieties Azucena and IRAT104<br />
and sensitive varieties IR45 and IR1552 was conducted to <strong>in</strong>vestigate<br />
the genetics of Al tolerance <strong>in</strong> rice (Khatiwada et al<br />
1996). The results showed that Al tolerance is governed by<br />
both additive and dom<strong>in</strong>ance effects, with a preponderance of<br />
additive effects, suggest<strong>in</strong>g the effects of several genes on Al<br />
tolerance. The detection of putative QTLs could lead to the<br />
identification of genes controll<strong>in</strong>g Al tolerance or to the identification<br />
of tightly l<strong>in</strong>ked markers to be used <strong>in</strong> marker-assisted<br />
selection <strong>in</strong> rice. This study was conducted to determ<strong>in</strong>e<br />
the variability of Al tolerance among 11 rice varieties and to<br />
map genes or quantitative trait loci (QTLs) controll<strong>in</strong>g Al tolerance<br />
<strong>in</strong> rice us<strong>in</strong>g a cross between two <strong>in</strong>dica varieties, Altolerant<br />
local variety Chiembau and susceptible improved variety<br />
Omon 269-65.<br />
Materials and methods<br />
Evaluation of rice l<strong>in</strong>es for Al tolerance<br />
Eleven rice genotypes (Table 1) were tested to determ<strong>in</strong>e the<br />
genetic variability of Al tolerance <strong>in</strong> the laboratory us<strong>in</strong>g a<br />
nutrient solution culture modified after Khatiwada et al (1996).<br />
Azucena was used as the Al-tolerant check variety. The experiment<br />
was conducted us<strong>in</strong>g a randomized complete block<br />
design (RCBD) with six replications <strong>in</strong> 1997 at the Plant Molecular<br />
<strong>Genetics</strong> Laboratory, Texas Tech University.<br />
Seeds with uniform size were sterilized with 15% H 2 O 2 ,<br />
r<strong>in</strong>sed with distilled water, and <strong>in</strong>cubated on filter papers soaked<br />
with distilled water <strong>in</strong> the dark at 30 °C for 2 d. Germ<strong>in</strong>ated<br />
seeds were grown <strong>in</strong> distilled water for another 2 d <strong>in</strong> a culture<br />
room ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed at 27 ± 2 °C with 12 h of light at 300 photosynthetic<br />
photon flux density (PPFD). Seedl<strong>in</strong>gs were then<br />
sown on a styrofoam sheet with a nylon net bottom with one<br />
seedl<strong>in</strong>g per hole and 10 seedl<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> one row per variety <strong>in</strong><br />
each replication. The styrofoam sheets were floated on a nutrient<br />
solution <strong>in</strong> a plastic tray conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g either 0 (control) or<br />
10-, 20-, 30-, 40-, 50-, 60-, 80-, and 100-ppm Al (stress treatment).<br />
The nutrient solution was replaced every 5 d. The pH<br />
of the solutions was adjusted daily to 4.0 with 1 N NaOH or 1<br />
N HCl. The hydroponic trays and seedl<strong>in</strong>gs were ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
<strong>in</strong> the culture room at 27 ± 2 °C with 12 h of light at 300 PPFD<br />
as above. The longest root of each seedl<strong>in</strong>g was measured after<br />
10 d of growth <strong>in</strong> the control or stress solution. The ratio of<br />
root length under stress to that under nonstress conditions was<br />
used as the root tolerance <strong>in</strong>dex.<br />
Mapp<strong>in</strong>g genes controll<strong>in</strong>g Al tolerance <strong>in</strong> rice<br />
Al tolerance screen<strong>in</strong>g. The lead<strong>in</strong>g local Al-tolerant <strong>in</strong>dica<br />
rice variety Chiembau grown <strong>in</strong> northern Vietnam was crossed<br />
with an improved variety, Omon 269-65 (<strong>in</strong>dica), from southern<br />
Vietnam. From this cross, 188 F 2 plants were randomly<br />
selected and selfed to produce 182 F 3 l<strong>in</strong>es. These materials<br />
were screened for Al tolerance under control (0 ppm Al) and<br />
Al-stress conditions (30 ppm Al). Entries were arranged <strong>in</strong> a<br />
RCBD with three replications. For each l<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> each replication,<br />
the ratio of average root length under stress to that under<br />
nonstress conditions was computed. In addition, the ratio of<br />
shoot length under stress to that under nonstress conditions<br />
for each l<strong>in</strong>e was computed.<br />
Restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP)<br />
genotyp<strong>in</strong>g. Genomic DNA of parents and 188 F 2 progenies<br />
was extracted from 2 g of lyophilized leaf tissue. DNA was<br />
digested with XbaI, H<strong>in</strong>dIII, EcoRI, and EcoRV. Electrophoresis,<br />
Southern blott<strong>in</strong>g, and autoradiography followed standard<br />
procedures.<br />
Data analysis. An RFLP l<strong>in</strong>kage map was constructed<br />
us<strong>in</strong>g MAPMAKER. Trait means, correlation, and heritability<br />
were determ<strong>in</strong>ed us<strong>in</strong>g SAS (SAS Institute 1987). The mapp<strong>in</strong>g<br />
of QTLs was performed follow<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>in</strong>terval mapp<strong>in</strong>g<br />
method us<strong>in</strong>g MAPMAKER/QTL 1.1 (L<strong>in</strong>coln et al 1992).<br />
Results and discussion<br />
Screen<strong>in</strong>g for tolerance for Al toxicity<br />
Root length ratios of 11 rice genotypes under n<strong>in</strong>e different<br />
levels of Al toxicity are shown <strong>in</strong> Table 1. The results suggested<br />
that 30 ppm is an optimal Al level for screen<strong>in</strong>g of rice.<br />
Alum<strong>in</strong>um tolerance of 11 rice genotypes <strong>in</strong> this study could<br />
be divided <strong>in</strong>to three major groups: (1) the highest Al tolerance<br />
group, which <strong>in</strong>cludes CT9993 and Nipponbare; (2) the<br />
<strong>in</strong>termediate Al tolerance group, which consists of<br />
Moroberekan, Azucena, Chiembau, and Cadungdo; and (3)<br />
the susceptible group, which <strong>in</strong>cludes IR20, IR64, Omon 269-<br />
65, Pokkali, and IR62266.<br />
Mapp<strong>in</strong>g genes controll<strong>in</strong>g Al tolerance <strong>in</strong> rice<br />
The RFLP results and genetic map construction were discussed<br />
by Nguyen et al (2001). The result<strong>in</strong>g l<strong>in</strong>kage map spanned<br />
1,715.8 cM, with an average distance of 10.46 cM (Kosambi<br />
1944) between markers (Figure 1 as shown <strong>in</strong> Nguyen et al<br />
2001). There are gaps on chromosomes 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, and 10,<br />
but genome coverage was estimated to be approximately 90%<br />
based on alignment to the map of Causse et al (1994). Interval<br />
mapp<strong>in</strong>g analysis revealed a total of 20 QTLs for six root- and<br />
shoot-related traits.<br />
Control root length. Three QTLs—QAlCr2a, QAlCr3a,<br />
and QAlC6a—were mapped on chromosomes 2, 3, and 6. Multiple<br />
QTL model analysis <strong>in</strong>dicated that these QTLs expla<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
18.3% of the phenotypic variance.<br />
Molecular markers, QTL mapp<strong>in</strong>g, and marker-assisted selection 299
Table 1. Mean relative root length (RR) of 11 genotypes under n<strong>in</strong>e different Al toxicity levels. a<br />
Genotype<br />
Al (ppm)<br />
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 80 100<br />
CT9993 100 102.92 81.14 56.37 37.48 34.17 31.69 29.9 24.18<br />
Nipponbare 100 80.50 79.55 59.14 42.98 35.94 28.33 27.68 20.19<br />
Moroberekan 100 69.01 51.68 41.32 30.31 26.28 21.34 19.61 13.58<br />
Azucena 100 67.49 54.36 46.43 34.59 30.26 29.15 26.20 22.68<br />
Chiembau 100 65.42 46.41 35.19 33.51 28.49 30.30 26.11 24.77<br />
Cadungdo 100 53.42 47.42 32.54 29.29 24.19 28.98 21.38 18.32<br />
Omon 269-65 100 51.57 34.92 22.50 13.35 16.31 15.44 14.53 12.85<br />
IR20 100 48.27 31.49 26.01 19.17 29.48 24.14 21.06 16.17<br />
IR64 100 45.28 29.54 23.60 20.94 21.61 20.02 19.92 16.70<br />
IR62266 100 42.40 31.75 17.71 16.32 15.71 14.63 11.22 8.27<br />
Pokkali 100 37.05 26.61 18.51 16.69 19.81 18.99 18.79 17.19<br />
Mean value (%) – 60.34 46.80 34.48 26.81 25.68 23.90 21.49 17.68<br />
LSD (0.05) – 18.19 12.74 8.10 6.17 4.29 6.55 3.04 2.54<br />
CV (%) – 25.99 23.47 20.27 19.86 14.42 23.63 12.19 12.39<br />
Root length under stress<br />
a RR = × 100.<br />
Root length under no stress<br />
Stress root length. Three QTLs—QAlSr1a, QAlSr1b, and<br />
QAlSr12a—were detected on chromosomes 1 and 12. Collectively,<br />
three QTLs expla<strong>in</strong>ed 38.9% of the phenotypic variance.<br />
An additional QTL, QAlR1a, was found on chromosome<br />
1 near QAlSr1b based on root measurement of the F 2 plants.<br />
Root length ratio. Two major QTLs—QAlRr1a and<br />
QAlRr2a—and two possible QTLs—QAlRr5a and<br />
QAlRr11a—were detected on chromosomes 1, 2, 3, 5, and 11.<br />
A full model conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the four QTLs expla<strong>in</strong>ed 39.8% of the<br />
phenotypic variance.<br />
Control shoot length. Two QTLs—QAlCs1a and<br />
QAlCs10a—were identified on chromosomes 1 and 10. A full<br />
model conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the two QTLs expla<strong>in</strong>ed 44.9% of the phenotypic<br />
variance.<br />
Stress shoot length. Three QTLs—QAlSs1a, QAlSs1b,<br />
and QAlSs1a—were identified on chromosomes 1 and 10. A<br />
possible QTL, QAlSs3a, was found on chromosome 3. A full<br />
model conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the four QTLs expla<strong>in</strong>ed 59.7% of the phenotypic<br />
variance.<br />
Shoot length ratio. QTL QAlS3a was identified on chromosome<br />
3 and a possible QTL, QAlS6a, was found on chromosome<br />
6. A full model conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the two QTLs expla<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
15.5% of the phenotypic variance.<br />
A total of n<strong>in</strong>e different genomic regions on eight chromosomes<br />
have been implicated <strong>in</strong> the genetic control of root<br />
and shoot growth under Al stress. By far, the greatest effects<br />
on Al tolerance were associated with the region near WG110<br />
on chromosome 1. This region conta<strong>in</strong>s a major QTL for Al<br />
tolerance <strong>in</strong> rice. Our analysis <strong>in</strong>dicated that this QTL is consistent<br />
with other rice mapp<strong>in</strong>g populations when compared<br />
with results obta<strong>in</strong>ed by Wu et al (2000) and our unpublished<br />
data from a doubled-haploid population of CT9993/IR62266.<br />
The major gene <strong>in</strong> this region does not seem to correspond to<br />
most of the genes that have been mapped for Al tolerance <strong>in</strong><br />
other cereals. The results of this and other studies suggest that<br />
Al tolerance <strong>in</strong> rice is a polygenic trait with major and m<strong>in</strong>or<br />
genes <strong>in</strong>volved.<br />
References<br />
Causse MA, Fulton TM, Cho YG, Ahn SN, Chunwongse J, Wu K,<br />
Xiao J, Yu Z, Ronald PC, Harr<strong>in</strong>gton SE, Second G, McCouch<br />
SR, Tanksley SD. 1994. Saturated molecular map of the rice<br />
genome based on an <strong>in</strong>terspecific backcross population. <strong>Genetics</strong><br />
138:1251-1274.<br />
Khatiwada SP, Senadhira D, Carpena AL, Zeigler RS, Fernandez<br />
PG. 1996. Variability and genetics of tolerance for alum<strong>in</strong>um<br />
toxicity <strong>in</strong> rice (Oryza sativa L.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 93:738-<br />
744.<br />
Kosambi DD. 1944. The estimation of map distances from recomb<strong>in</strong>ation<br />
values. Ann. Eugen. 12:172-175.<br />
L<strong>in</strong>coln SE, Daly MJ, Lander ES. 1992. Mapp<strong>in</strong>g genes controll<strong>in</strong>g<br />
quantitative traits with MAPMAKER/QTL 1.1. 2nd ed. Whitehead<br />
Institute Technical Report. Cambridge, MA.<br />
Nguyen VT, Burow MD, Nguyen HT, Le BT, Le TD, Paterson AH.<br />
2001. Molecular mapp<strong>in</strong>g of genes conferr<strong>in</strong>g alum<strong>in</strong>um tolerance<br />
<strong>in</strong> rice (Oryza sativa L.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 102:1002-<br />
1010.<br />
SAS Institute. 1987. SAS/STAT guide for personal computer version<br />
6. Cary, N.C. (USA): SAS Institute.<br />
Wu P, Liao CY, Hu B, Yi KK, J<strong>in</strong> WZ, Ni JJ, He C. 2000. QTLs and<br />
epistasis for alum<strong>in</strong>um tolerance <strong>in</strong> rice (Oryza sativa L.) at<br />
different seed<strong>in</strong>g stages. Theor. Appl. Genet. 100:1295-1303.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ addresses: B.T. Le, Institute of Biotechnology, Hanoi,<br />
Vietnam; V.T. Nguyen and A.H. Paterson, Plant Genome Mapp<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Laboratory, Texas A&M University, College Station,<br />
Texas (current address: Plant Genome Mapp<strong>in</strong>g Laboratory,<br />
University of Georgia, Athens); H.T. Nguyen, Plant Molecular<br />
<strong>Genetics</strong> Laboratory, Texas Tech University, Lubbock,<br />
Texas; V.T. Nguyen and T.D. Le, Department of <strong>Genetics</strong>,<br />
National University of Hanoi, Hanoi, Vietnam.<br />
300 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
11.3<br />
9.3<br />
16.7<br />
6.7<br />
9.2<br />
24.6<br />
19.9<br />
12.9<br />
7.7<br />
5.1<br />
24.3<br />
1.0<br />
7.8<br />
9.5<br />
9.0<br />
5.6<br />
26.2<br />
2.3<br />
18.9<br />
4.4<br />
22.1<br />
12.6<br />
7.2<br />
Chr 1<br />
RG459<br />
RZ390b<br />
RG236<br />
RG323<br />
WG110<br />
RG109<br />
RG780<br />
PSB414***<br />
RG394<br />
RZ730a<br />
RZ730b**<br />
CDO920*** 25.7<br />
RZ413b***<br />
RZ413a***<br />
RZ244***<br />
RG118***<br />
RZ489***<br />
RG811<br />
RG532b<br />
RG532a<br />
RG246b*<br />
RG246a***<br />
RG447*<br />
RG313a<br />
RG472<br />
7.4<br />
5.4<br />
13.5<br />
19.0<br />
9.1<br />
12.9<br />
3.1<br />
0.8<br />
7.4<br />
3.7<br />
3.4<br />
8.5<br />
1.8<br />
1.6<br />
16.6<br />
22.3<br />
27.4<br />
9.4<br />
Chr 2<br />
CUS382b***<br />
CDO109b***<br />
RZ681**<br />
RZ446***<br />
RG256<br />
CDO204*<br />
CDO941<br />
RZ273<br />
CDO1417<br />
RZ567<br />
RG139<br />
CDO395<br />
RG171b<br />
RG171a*<br />
RZ342<br />
RG544<br />
CUS39<br />
RG83<br />
RG152*<br />
RG634b**<br />
RG555<br />
RG634a<br />
25.5<br />
25.4<br />
5.4<br />
1.3<br />
25.2<br />
12.8<br />
13.8<br />
22.5<br />
7.6<br />
0.4<br />
25.0<br />
18.0<br />
6.0<br />
1.2<br />
12.9<br />
10.6<br />
Chr 9<br />
RG996<br />
RZ142<br />
RZ448<br />
CD0122<br />
17.1<br />
20.6<br />
6.1<br />
13.6<br />
2.8<br />
8.1<br />
RZ474*** 3.0<br />
9.5<br />
RG179<br />
CUS382a<br />
CDO109a***<br />
RG445a***<br />
17.3<br />
2.2<br />
RG227 1.8<br />
11.7<br />
CDO1387<br />
Chr 3 Chr 4<br />
CDO192a*<br />
RZ455*<br />
RZ698<br />
RG553b<br />
RG553a<br />
RZ422<br />
CDO412***<br />
BCD926***<br />
RG570<br />
18.5<br />
5.3<br />
25.2<br />
10.2<br />
4.3<br />
27.4<br />
5.9<br />
19.8<br />
RZ879<br />
RG182 9.9<br />
3.4<br />
RG620 28.6<br />
0.4<br />
4.5<br />
14.1<br />
RG214 6.6 RG13<br />
RZ909* 0.3<br />
RZ993 10.4<br />
3.9<br />
RZ649* 10.8<br />
RZ939 9.9<br />
RG163<br />
BCD454*<br />
RZ740, RZ676<br />
20.7<br />
RZ668 16.8<br />
RZ675<br />
RG470* 4.7<br />
19.4<br />
28.3<br />
RZ225<br />
14.8<br />
RG247a***<br />
RG119*<br />
17.6<br />
RZ656<br />
RG396<br />
RZ69<br />
Chr 5<br />
CDO456<br />
Chr 10<br />
RG313b***<br />
RG257<br />
RZ892<br />
RG313c<br />
RZ960*<br />
RZ583<br />
BCD886<br />
RZ421<br />
RG561b<br />
RG561a***<br />
5.3 RG1109<br />
RG353<br />
16.1<br />
0.7 RZ424a<br />
RZ424c<br />
1.6 RZ424b<br />
38.3<br />
4.8<br />
3.2<br />
2.1<br />
10.4<br />
6.6<br />
19.0<br />
10.5<br />
11.6<br />
22.0<br />
5.9<br />
16.8<br />
CDO226a<br />
CDO226b<br />
RZ5357a<br />
RZ5357b<br />
CDO365<br />
CDO534*<br />
RG1094*<br />
RG2<br />
RZ53<br />
RG1022<br />
RZ638<br />
RG525*<br />
27.4<br />
6.1<br />
3.8<br />
37.1<br />
20.2<br />
5.8<br />
2.9<br />
5.7<br />
20.5<br />
14.3<br />
Chr 6<br />
24.1<br />
RZ144a***<br />
CDO1380a*<br />
RZ144b<br />
CDO1380b<br />
RZ213<br />
CDO1395a<br />
RG123 CDO1395<br />
RZ953<br />
RG716a<br />
RZ682<br />
CDO544<br />
RG716b***<br />
RG716c***<br />
RG445b***<br />
RZ76*<br />
RG413<br />
CDO459<br />
RG247b**<br />
RG9*<br />
RG445c<br />
RG341<br />
RZ397<br />
RZ816b<br />
RG98***<br />
RZ251***<br />
5.5 RG351<br />
6.2<br />
3.1<br />
15.3<br />
13.6<br />
5.5<br />
22.0<br />
12.6<br />
9.0<br />
3.2<br />
12.4<br />
RG598***<br />
RG703<br />
RG433<br />
RZ989***<br />
BCD855***<br />
RG146***<br />
CDO59*<br />
RG678*<br />
RG29<br />
CDO407<br />
RZ488<br />
20.2<br />
9.7<br />
4.7<br />
20.0<br />
9.8<br />
15.2<br />
RG20<br />
RG333b<br />
RZ562*<br />
RZ291<br />
RG333a<br />
PSB108<br />
RZ926<br />
RG136***<br />
Control root length<br />
Stress root length<br />
Root length ratio<br />
Control shoot length<br />
Chr 11<br />
Stress shoot length<br />
Shoot length ratio<br />
42.6<br />
RZ816b<br />
Chr 12<br />
F 2 stress root length<br />
Chr 7<br />
Chr 8<br />
Fig. 1. A rice l<strong>in</strong>kage map with 164 RFLP marker loci constructed from 188 F 2 plants of the cross Chiembau/Omon 269-65. The numbers<br />
between marker loci are Kosambi cM. Chromosomal locations of putative QTLs contribut<strong>in</strong>g to Al tolerance of root length and shoot length<br />
of F 2 and F 3 populations <strong>in</strong> the cross Chiembau/Omon 269-65. The boxes cover the chromosomal regions where likelihood of the presence<br />
of a QTL was with<strong>in</strong> tenfold (1 LOD) of its maximal value and whiskers cover 2-LOD likelihood <strong>in</strong>tervals. *, **, and *** <strong>in</strong>dicate segregation<br />
significant at 0.05, 0.01, and 0.005 probabilities (from Nguyen et al 2000).<br />
Molecular markers, QTL mapp<strong>in</strong>g, and marker-assisted selection 301
Mapp<strong>in</strong>g QTLs for ozone resistance <strong>in</strong> rice<br />
J.K. Sohn, J.J. Lee, K.M. Kim, Y.S. Kwon, and M.Y. Eun<br />
Genotypic differences and <strong>in</strong>heritance of ozone (O 3<br />
) resistance <strong>in</strong> rice were tested <strong>in</strong> a chamber with an O 3<br />
-produc<strong>in</strong>g and<br />
monitor<strong>in</strong>g system. Most of the <strong>in</strong>dica cultivars were more resistant than the japonica cultivars based on leaf <strong>in</strong>jury to O 3<br />
. The<br />
segregation for O 3<br />
resistance <strong>in</strong> the F 2<br />
of a cross between resistant and susceptible cultivars revealed a nearly normal distribution.<br />
Three significant QTLs associated with O 3<br />
resistance <strong>in</strong> rice were mapped us<strong>in</strong>g the National Institute of Agricultural<br />
Science and Technology (NIAST) map and the 164 recomb<strong>in</strong>ant <strong>in</strong>bred l<strong>in</strong>es (MG RILs, F 13<br />
) derived from Milyang23 (<strong>in</strong>dica/<br />
japonica)/Gihobyeo (japonica). These QTLs conferr<strong>in</strong>g O 3<br />
resistance were l<strong>in</strong>ked to RZ569A–RG109 on chromosome 1, C507–<br />
KCD405 on chromosome 7, and RG119–E13M60.348 on chromosome 11, expla<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g 20.5% of the total phenotypic variation.<br />
The relationship between O 3<br />
resistance and RFLP markers was analyzed <strong>in</strong> the F 2<br />
populations derived from Milyang 23/<br />
Chucheongbyeo and Milyang 23/Daeribbyeo 1. The RFLP marker RG109 turned out to be polymorphic and significantly dist<strong>in</strong>guished<br />
resistance and susceptibility to O 3<br />
of the F 2<br />
populations.<br />
Ozone (O 3 ), a primary component of photochemical air pollution,<br />
causes foliar <strong>in</strong>jury to many plant species. The severity<br />
of O 3 damage can vary significantly, depend<strong>in</strong>g on the plant<br />
species or cultivar, O 3 concentration, and duration of O 3 exposure.<br />
Genotypic differences <strong>in</strong> response to O 3 stress have<br />
been noted <strong>in</strong> tobacco, potato, and soybean (Heagle et al 1998).<br />
The objectives of this study were to detect the quantitative<br />
trait loci (QTLs) for O 3 resistance and to analyze the effectiveness<br />
of molecular marker-assisted selection (MAS) for resistance<br />
to O 3 stress <strong>in</strong> rice. Injury was dist<strong>in</strong>ctly visible when<br />
rice plants were fumigated for 3 to 4 h at 0.3 ppm O 3 concentration<br />
<strong>in</strong> a chamber with the O 3 generator and monitor<strong>in</strong>g system.<br />
Most of the <strong>in</strong>dica cultivars were relatively more resistant<br />
than japonica varieties based on leaf <strong>in</strong>jury to O 3 . F 1 plants<br />
from crosses between resistant cultivar Milyang23 and susceptible<br />
cultivar Chucheongbyeo or Daeribbyeo 1 showed an<br />
<strong>in</strong>termediate reaction to O 3 . The segregation for O 3 resistance<br />
<strong>in</strong> the F 2 populations of the crosses revealed a nearly normal<br />
distribution. Cont<strong>in</strong>uous variation <strong>in</strong> the response of F 2 plants<br />
to O 3 suggests that O 3 resistance of rice may be quantitatively<br />
<strong>in</strong>herited (Sohn et al 1998). The advent of molecular marker<br />
technology has led to the development of genetic maps that<br />
make it possible to identify and locate genes or QTLs controll<strong>in</strong>g<br />
quantitative characters.<br />
The QTLs associated with O 3 resistance <strong>in</strong> rice were<br />
detected by us<strong>in</strong>g the NIAST map and the 164 recomb<strong>in</strong>ant<br />
<strong>in</strong>bred l<strong>in</strong>es derived from a cross between Milyang23 and<br />
Gihobyeo (Cho et al 1998). Three significant QTLs related to<br />
O 3 resistance were detected by <strong>in</strong>terval mapp<strong>in</strong>g analysis (Table<br />
1). The putative QTLs tentatively named qOZ-1, qOZ-7, and<br />
qOZ-11 were located on chromosomes 1, 7, and 11, respectively<br />
(Fig. 1). QTL qOZ-1 was found with<strong>in</strong> RZ569A–RG109,<br />
qOZ-7 was with<strong>in</strong> C507–KCD405, and qOZ-11 with<strong>in</strong> RG119–<br />
E13M60.348 (Fig. 1). The phenotypic variation expla<strong>in</strong>ed by<br />
each QTL for O 3 resistance ranged from 4.8% to 8.4%.<br />
Milyang23 alleles, represented by QTLs qOZ-1 and qOZ-11,<br />
<strong>in</strong>creased O 3 resistance, with an additive effect from 0.27 to<br />
0.29, whereas qOZ-7 <strong>in</strong> Gihobyeo reduced O 3 resistance, with<br />
an additive effect of 0.28 (Table 1). To assess the effectiveness<br />
of MAS for O 3 resistance, we chose 24 F 2 plants with<br />
resistance and 24 F 2 plants with susceptibility to O 3 stress<br />
through phenotypic selection <strong>in</strong> the crosses Milyang 23/<br />
Chucheongbyeo and Milyang23/Daeribbyeo 1. The relationship<br />
between O 3 resistance and restriction fragment length<br />
polymorphism markers tightly l<strong>in</strong>ked to QTL regions was analyzed.<br />
RG109 was significantly dist<strong>in</strong>guished between O 3 -resistant<br />
and -susceptible l<strong>in</strong>es (Fig. 2).<br />
Results <strong>in</strong>dicated that molecular markers can be used to<br />
screen rice germplasm and to detect <strong>in</strong>trogression for O 3 resistance<br />
<strong>in</strong> segregat<strong>in</strong>g populations.<br />
References<br />
Cho YG, McCouch SR, Kuiper M, Kang MR, Pot J, Groenen JTM,<br />
Eun MY. 1998. Integrated map of AFLP, SSLP and RFLP<br />
markers us<strong>in</strong>g a recomb<strong>in</strong>ant <strong>in</strong>bred population of rice (Oryza<br />
sativa L.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 97:370-380.<br />
Table 1. Characteristics of QTLs associated with O 3 resistance <strong>in</strong> 164 MG RILs. a<br />
QTLs Chromosome Markers F value P value LOD Variation Additive<br />
(%) effect<br />
qOZ-1 1 RZ569A–RG109 11.71 0.0008 2.48 8.43 –0.29<br />
qOZ-7 7 C507–KCD 405 12.39 0.0006 2.62 4.76 0.28<br />
qOZ-11 11 RG119–E13M60.348 15.38 0.0001 3.22 7.27 –0.27<br />
a MG RILs = recomb<strong>in</strong>ant <strong>in</strong>bred l<strong>in</strong>es derived from Milyang 23/Gihobyeo.<br />
302 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
C161<br />
RG140<br />
EStI-1<br />
RG165<br />
RG128<br />
RG678<br />
RG304A<br />
RM40<br />
RZ638<br />
Fig. 1. Genetic l<strong>in</strong>kage map show<strong>in</strong>g<br />
locations of putative QTLs associated<br />
with O 3 resistance (each bar) of 164<br />
MG recomb<strong>in</strong>ant <strong>in</strong>bred l<strong>in</strong>es.<br />
RM35<br />
RG811<br />
RM11<br />
RG711<br />
qOZ-11<br />
E13M60.348<br />
13.0 cM<br />
RG119, RG1094<br />
RZ797<br />
RG375<br />
qOZ-7<br />
KCD405<br />
7.7 cM<br />
C507<br />
RG353<br />
RZ536<br />
RG519<br />
E13M59.380<br />
Chr. 11<br />
qOZ-1<br />
Chr. 1<br />
RZ513<br />
RG109<br />
4.3 cM<br />
RZ569A<br />
RZ14<br />
E26M47.M002<br />
Chr. 7<br />
E23M50.113<br />
C213<br />
Fig. 2. Autoradiography of<br />
Southern hybridization of BglII<br />
digest of rice DNA with radiolabeled<br />
probe RG109 <strong>in</strong> F 2<br />
populations derived from the<br />
crosses Milyang23 (P1)/<br />
Chucheongbyeo (P2) (A) and<br />
Milyang23 (P1)/Daeribbyeo 1<br />
(P2) (B). Phenotype: R = resistant,<br />
S = susceptible to O 3 .<br />
Genotype: 1–48 = F 2 plants.<br />
A<br />
Phenotype R S R R<br />
Genotype P1 P2 F 1 1<br />
R<br />
24<br />
S<br />
25<br />
5<br />
48<br />
Phenotype R S R R<br />
Genotype P1 P2 F 1 1<br />
R<br />
24<br />
B<br />
S<br />
25<br />
S<br />
48<br />
Molecular markers, QTL mapp<strong>in</strong>g, and marker-assisted selection 303
Heagle AS, Miller JE, Booker FL. 1998. Influence of ozone stress<br />
on soybean response to carbon dioxide enrichment. I. Foliar<br />
properties. Crop Sci. 38:113-121.<br />
Sohn JK, Kwon YS, Kim KM. 1998. Inheritance of resistance to<br />
ozone <strong>in</strong> rice. Kor. J. Breed. 30(2):168-171.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ addresses: J.K. Sohn, J.J. Lee, K.M. Kim, Y.S. Kwon,<br />
Department of Agronomy, College of Agriculture, Kyungpook<br />
National University, Taegu 702-701; M.Y. Eun, Bioresources,<br />
National Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology,<br />
Rural Development Adm<strong>in</strong>istration, Suwon 441-707, Korea.<br />
F<strong>in</strong>e mapp<strong>in</strong>g of genes controll<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>termediate amylose<br />
content <strong>in</strong> rice us<strong>in</strong>g bulked segregant analysis<br />
J. Lanceras, S. Tragoonrung, A. Vanavichit, and O. Naivikul<br />
Amylose content (AC) is an important trait determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g cook<strong>in</strong>g and eat<strong>in</strong>g quality of rice. Bulked segregant analysis was used<br />
to identify markers <strong>in</strong> the region of chromosome 6 conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the quantitative trait locus (QTL) for AC. Two DNA pools based on<br />
the parental genotype for both markers def<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the target <strong>in</strong>terval and two pools produced from the phenotypic data were<br />
constructed. The genotype pools composed of 10 <strong>in</strong>dividuals per pool were homozygous for the oppos<strong>in</strong>g alleles for the region<br />
of the QTL def<strong>in</strong>ed by R1962 and RZ588. The phenotype-based pools were also composed of 10 <strong>in</strong>dividuals. The low-AC pool<br />
conta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong>dividuals with ACs rang<strong>in</strong>g from 11% to 16%, whereas the high-AC pool had 23–24% AC. The pools were screened<br />
us<strong>in</strong>g 85 AFLP PCR II comb<strong>in</strong>ations. Two polymorphic markers were identified to be l<strong>in</strong>ked to chromosome 6: AC11 and AC12.<br />
A waxy microsatellite marker flank<strong>in</strong>g (CT) n<br />
repeats at the 5′ regulatory region of the waxy gene was also used and mapped 7.2<br />
cM from R1962. AC QTLs were reanalyzed and four QTLs were detected on chromosomes 3, 4, 6, and 7. The QTL detected on<br />
chromosome 6 near the waxy microsatellite marker expla<strong>in</strong>ed 58.7% of the phenotypic variation as part of the 80% variation<br />
expla<strong>in</strong>ed by the four QTLs. Marker AC12 on chromosome 6 was found 0.1 cM from the waxy marker. KDML105 contributed<br />
low-AC QTLs on chromosomes 6 and 7, and CT9993 contributed QTLs on chromosomes 3 and 4. AC is positively correlated<br />
with gelat<strong>in</strong>ization temperature (GT) (0.3194) and negatively correlated with gel consistency (GC) (0.8011). The KDML105 ×<br />
CT9993 population favored low to <strong>in</strong>termediate AC with high GT and hard GC. AC12 and the waxy microsatellite marker will be<br />
useful for marker-assisted breed<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
Establish<strong>in</strong>g a tight l<strong>in</strong>kage between the gene and the marker<br />
is the basic requirement <strong>in</strong> marker-assisted selection (MAS).<br />
Bulked segregant analysis (BSA) is a fast method for identify<strong>in</strong>g<br />
markers <strong>in</strong> the specific region of <strong>in</strong>terest. DNA pools can<br />
be constructed based on the genotype and phenotype of the<br />
exist<strong>in</strong>g mapp<strong>in</strong>g population from which the map can be produced<br />
(Michelmore et al 1991). <strong>Rice</strong> eat<strong>in</strong>g and cook<strong>in</strong>g qualities<br />
are important agronomic traits and they should be emphasized<br />
<strong>in</strong> breed<strong>in</strong>g programs. Amylose content (AC) determ<strong>in</strong>es<br />
the appearance and texture of rice. Likewise, rice used for <strong>in</strong>dustrial<br />
purposes has specific properties dictated by AC. In<br />
this study, <strong>in</strong>formation about the markers <strong>in</strong> the region of chromosome<br />
6 conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the QTL for AC was identified and used<br />
<strong>in</strong> the BSA to produce new markers <strong>in</strong> the region of the QTL<br />
(Table 1). The waxy microsatellite marker was also genotyped<br />
<strong>in</strong> the 141 recomb<strong>in</strong>ant <strong>in</strong>bred l<strong>in</strong>es (RILs) from the Khao Dawk<br />
Mali 105 (KDML105) × CT9993 cross. Gel consistency (GC)<br />
and gelat<strong>in</strong>ization temperature (GT) also play a role <strong>in</strong> the<br />
cook<strong>in</strong>g and process<strong>in</strong>g quality of rice. The correlation among<br />
AC, GC, and GT was also <strong>in</strong>vestigated.<br />
Materials and methods<br />
A population of 141 RILs of rice was used for mapp<strong>in</strong>g. The<br />
population was derived from a cross between KDML105 with<br />
<strong>in</strong>termediate AC (16.78%), medium GC, and low GT (Table<br />
2). In contrast, CT9993-5-10-1-M has a high AC (24.04%),<br />
hard GC, and high GT. AC was determ<strong>in</strong>ed follow<strong>in</strong>g the procedure<br />
of Juliano and Villareal (1993). Procedures for GC and<br />
GT were followed from Cagampang et al (1973) and Little et<br />
al (1958), respectively.<br />
DNA from selected plants was quantified on agarose gels<br />
and approximately 2 µg of each sample was comb<strong>in</strong>ed to make<br />
the DNA pools. The comb<strong>in</strong>ed mixture was diluted to a f<strong>in</strong>al<br />
concentration of 100 ng µL –1 (Michelmore et al 1991). DNA<br />
pool A conta<strong>in</strong>ed DNA from plants that were homozygous for<br />
the KDML105 segment for the genomic <strong>in</strong>terval between markers<br />
R1962 and RZ588. DNA pool B conta<strong>in</strong>ed DNA from<br />
plants that were homozygous for the CT9993 segment for the<br />
same <strong>in</strong>terval. Likewise, phenotype bulks were created based<br />
on the amylose content of the plants. Phenotype bulk C conta<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
DNA from plants with low AC, whereas phenotype bulk<br />
D conta<strong>in</strong>ed DNA of <strong>in</strong>dividuals with high AC. The bulks were<br />
screened us<strong>in</strong>g amplified fragment length polymorphism<br />
(AFLP) follow<strong>in</strong>g the procedure of Vos et al (1995). The first<br />
round of AFLP analysis was done us<strong>in</strong>g the four DNA pools<br />
together with the KDML105 and CT9993 DNA. Primer comb<strong>in</strong>ations<br />
show<strong>in</strong>g polymorphic bands between the genotype<br />
and phenotype bulks were used to screen the RIL populations<br />
to confirm and quantify the l<strong>in</strong>kage between the polymorphic<br />
304 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
Table 1. Numerical scor<strong>in</strong>g data of RILs mak<strong>in</strong>g up the DNA pools def<strong>in</strong>ed by markers<br />
flank<strong>in</strong>g the QTL and markers produced through bulked segregant analysis (BSA).<br />
DNA Marker <strong>in</strong>terval AFLP markers DNA Marker <strong>in</strong>terval AFLP markers<br />
pool from BSA pool from BSA<br />
Pool A R1962 RZ588 AC12 AC11 Pool B R1962 RZ588 AC12 AC11<br />
RI l<strong>in</strong>es<br />
RI l<strong>in</strong>es<br />
1 1 1 0 3 22 3 3 3 0<br />
46 1 1 1 1 29 3 3 3 3<br />
62 1 1 1 3 31 3 3 3 0<br />
69 1 1 1 3 32 3 3 3 0<br />
94 1 1 0 0 42 3 3 3 3<br />
101 1 1 1 3 57 3 3 3 3<br />
119 1 1 1 3 71 3 3 3 1<br />
135 1 1 3 1 88 3 3 3 3<br />
146 1 1 0 3 109 3 3 3 1<br />
154 1 1 1 3 122 3 3 3 3<br />
marker and the target region/locus of <strong>in</strong>terest. All AFLP-produced<br />
markers were designated with the code AC.<br />
Segregation data for all polymorphic markers that were<br />
produced as well as the waxy microsatellite marker were analyzed<br />
by MAPMAKER (Lander et al 1987). QTL analysis was<br />
performed with the software package MQTL. Both simple <strong>in</strong>terval<br />
mapp<strong>in</strong>g (SIM) and simplified composite <strong>in</strong>terval mapp<strong>in</strong>g<br />
(sCIM) procedures were used for QTL detection. The<br />
data set was analyzed with 1,000 permutations, a 5-cM walk<strong>in</strong>g<br />
speed, and a type I error rate of 5%. The significant threshold<br />
(an LOD score of 2.4 or above) was used to declare the<br />
presence of a QTL. Twenty-seven background markers were<br />
specified as cofactors <strong>in</strong> the sCIM (T<strong>in</strong>ker and Mather 1995).<br />
Association of markers with AC was analyzed us<strong>in</strong>g simple<br />
regression, multiple regression, and ANOVA procedure <strong>in</strong><br />
Statgraphics3. Correlation of the three traits was also analyzed<br />
us<strong>in</strong>g the same methods.<br />
Results and discussion<br />
The region of chromosome 6 conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the QTL for AC<br />
flanked by R1962 and RZ588 with an <strong>in</strong>terval size of 11.6 cM<br />
was identified for f<strong>in</strong>e-mapp<strong>in</strong>g procedures. This QTL expla<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
17.2% of the phenotypic variation <strong>in</strong> AC. A total of 85<br />
AFLP PCR II comb<strong>in</strong>ations were used to screen the bulks. A<br />
total of 92 and 73 polymorphic bands for the genotype pools<br />
(bulks A and B) and phenotype pools (bulks C and D), respectively,<br />
were identified follow<strong>in</strong>g the polymorphism pattern<br />
observed between KDML105 and CT9993. Polymorphic loci<br />
identified by the phenotype bulks could possibly be mapped<br />
at a location other than the chromosome 6 region of the QTL.<br />
With this pattern of select<strong>in</strong>g polymorphic bands, n<strong>in</strong>e loci<br />
were detected. The same comb<strong>in</strong>ations were used to screen<br />
the recomb<strong>in</strong>ant <strong>in</strong>bred l<strong>in</strong>es for segregation analysis (Table<br />
1). The segregation data for AC11 <strong>in</strong>dicate that pools A and B<br />
were skewed and may cause contam<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>in</strong> the pools by the<br />
opposite alleles. This was also observed <strong>in</strong> the study of<br />
Giovannoni et al (1991). The polymorphism observed us<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Table 2. Classes of amylose content (AC) with vary<strong>in</strong>g types of gelat<strong>in</strong>ization<br />
temperature (GT) and gel consistency (GC) exam<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong><br />
the 141 recomb<strong>in</strong>ant <strong>in</strong>bred l<strong>in</strong>es (RILs) of KDML105 × CT9993.<br />
Class AC (%) GT value GC value AC-GT-GC RILs<br />
comb<strong>in</strong>ations a (no.)<br />
1 11 1.00 42.00 L-H-M 1<br />
2 12 1.28 58.75 L-H-M 4<br />
3 13 1.54 56.20 L-H-M 5<br />
4 14 2.80 43.00 L-H-M 1<br />
5 15 1.89 63.67 L-H-S 3<br />
6 16 1.76 41.57 L-H-M 7<br />
7 17 4.10 32.50 L-I-Ha 2<br />
8 18 2.28 30.50 L-HI-Ha 4<br />
9 19 1.33 22.00 L-HI-Ha 3<br />
10 20 1.94 23.53 I-H-Ha 15<br />
11 21 2.24 22.24 I-H-Ha 21<br />
12 22 2.64 22.08 I-HI-Ha 26<br />
13 23 4.00 21.40 I-I-Ha 15<br />
14 24 3.62 20.50 I-I-Ha 6<br />
Total<br />
113 a<br />
a L = low, I = <strong>in</strong>termediate, S = soft, M = medium, HI = high <strong>in</strong>termediate, H =<br />
high, Ha = hard. b Number of l<strong>in</strong>es with complete data for AC, GT, and GC.<br />
the AC11 comb<strong>in</strong>ation could reflect competition between prim<strong>in</strong>g<br />
sites <strong>in</strong> the skewed region. This expla<strong>in</strong>s the location of<br />
AC11 out of the target region.<br />
L<strong>in</strong>kage of the AFLP markers and the waxy microsatellite<br />
marker was determ<strong>in</strong>ed us<strong>in</strong>g MAPMAKER. The waxy marker<br />
was located 7.1 cM away from R1962. Two of the n<strong>in</strong>e polymorphic<br />
loci were l<strong>in</strong>ked to chromosome 6. Marker AC12 (E/<br />
CT-M/CTC) was mapped 0.1 cM from the waxy locus. In contrast,<br />
AC11 (E/CT-M/CTA) was mapped far from the selected<br />
<strong>in</strong>terval (108.9 cM from RZ588) (Fig. 1). The map from which<br />
the QTL for AC was analyzed is composed of 192 markers<br />
compris<strong>in</strong>g a total l<strong>in</strong>kage distance of 1,626.2 cM. The average<br />
two-locus <strong>in</strong>terval is 8.5 cM. Of the 192 marker loci, 120<br />
showed significant segregation distortion (P ≤ 0.05). KDML<br />
alleles were overrepresented at 97 loci ma<strong>in</strong>ly on seven different<br />
chromosomes. After add<strong>in</strong>g the two AFLP markers and<br />
Molecular markers, QTL mapp<strong>in</strong>g, and marker-assisted selection 305
cM<br />
1.6<br />
20.5<br />
4.4<br />
7.2<br />
11.6<br />
5.9<br />
28.6<br />
3.4<br />
1.1<br />
8.0<br />
24.5<br />
4.9<br />
15.0<br />
3.0<br />
3.7<br />
10.4<br />
6.3<br />
L203_7<br />
L203_3<br />
RM204 0.0 RM225<br />
AC12 0.1 waxy<br />
R1962<br />
RM217<br />
RZ588<br />
G200<br />
RZ667<br />
C1478<br />
R2171<br />
L212_2<br />
RG64<br />
L203_11<br />
L212_5 0.0 GA1_13<br />
RM3<br />
RM238<br />
AC11<br />
Fig. 1. Chromosome 6 map show<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
location of the QTL for amylose content.<br />
Markers <strong>in</strong> italics flanked the QTL<br />
(shaded box). Underl<strong>in</strong>ed markers represent<br />
markers produced by bulked<br />
segregant analysis.<br />
the waxy marker, the position of the QTL was found between<br />
the waxy marker and R1962. There were 22 low-AC transgressive<br />
segregants with AC values lower than those of<br />
KDML105. These data suggested that both parents possessed<br />
some alleles for low-AC phenotypes and a unique profile of<br />
alleles from the QTLs responsible for the expression of AC<br />
result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> low AC as exemplified by the transgressants.<br />
Four QTLs were detected on chromosomes 3, 4, 6, and<br />
7 us<strong>in</strong>g SIM and sCIM procedures of MQTL. The CT9993<br />
allele at both loci contributed to low AC <strong>in</strong> the progenies. These<br />
QTLs accounted for 11.3% and 16.0% of phenotypic variance<br />
expla<strong>in</strong>ed (PVE). The chromosome 6 QTL accounted for<br />
58.7% of the PVE. KDML105 contributed the low-AC allele<br />
at this locus. All QTLs expla<strong>in</strong>ed 80.2% of the AC variation<br />
observed <strong>in</strong> the RIL populations. A s<strong>in</strong>gle gene of major effect<br />
is responsible for differentiat<strong>in</strong>g low- and <strong>in</strong>termediate-AC<br />
parents, differ<strong>in</strong>g by only 6–12% <strong>in</strong> AC. The occurrence of<br />
transgressive segregants was due to modifier genes. The QTL<br />
data confirm the multilocus control of AC <strong>in</strong> KDML105 and<br />
provide some evidence for a low-AC allele <strong>in</strong> CT9993. These<br />
results supported the presence of transgressive segregation <strong>in</strong><br />
the KDML105 × CT9993 population.<br />
References<br />
Cagampang GB, Perez CM, Juliano BO. 1973. A gel consistency<br />
test for the eat<strong>in</strong>g quality of rice. J. Sci. Food Agric. 24:1589-<br />
1594.<br />
Giovannoni JJ, W<strong>in</strong>g RA, Ganal MW, Tanskley SD. 1991. Isolation<br />
of molecular markers from specific chromosomal <strong>in</strong>tervals<br />
us<strong>in</strong>g DNA pools from exist<strong>in</strong>g mapp<strong>in</strong>g populations. Nucl.<br />
Acids Res. 19(23):6553-6558.<br />
Juliano BO, Villareal CP. 1993. Gra<strong>in</strong> quality evaluation of world<br />
rices. Manila (Philipp<strong>in</strong>es): <strong>IRRI</strong>. 205 p.<br />
Lander ES, Green P, Abrahamson J, Barlow A, Daly MJ, L<strong>in</strong>coln<br />
SE, Newburg L. 1987. MAPMAKER: an <strong>in</strong>teractive computer<br />
package for construct<strong>in</strong>g primary genetic l<strong>in</strong>kage maps of experimental<br />
and natural populations. Genomics 1:174-181.<br />
Little RR, Hilder GB, Dawson EH. 1958. Differential effect of dilute<br />
alkali on 25 varieties of milled white rice. Cereal Chem.<br />
35:111-126.<br />
Michelmore RW, Paran I, Kesseli RV. 1991. Identification of markers<br />
l<strong>in</strong>ked to disease resistance genes by bulked segregant<br />
analysis: a rapid method to detect markers <strong>in</strong> specific regions<br />
by us<strong>in</strong>g segregat<strong>in</strong>g populations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA<br />
88:9828-9832.<br />
T<strong>in</strong>ker NA, Mather DE. 1995. MQTL: software for simplified composite<br />
<strong>in</strong>terval mapp<strong>in</strong>g of QTL <strong>in</strong> multiple environments.<br />
Available at http://probe.nalusda.gov: 8000/otherdocs/jqtl/<br />
jqtl1995-01, 16 October 1999.<br />
Vos P, Hogers R, Bleeker M, Reijans M, van de Lee T, Hornes M,<br />
Frijters A, Pot J, Peleman J, Kuiper M, Zabean M. 1995.<br />
AFLP: a new technique for DNA f<strong>in</strong>gerpr<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g. Nucl. Acids<br />
Res. 23(21):4407-4414.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ addresses: J. Lanceras, S. Tragoonrung, A. Vanavichit, DNA<br />
Technology Laboratory, Kasetsart University, Kamphangsaen,<br />
Nakorn Pathom 73140, Thailand; O. Naivikul, Faculty of<br />
Agro-Industry, Kasetsart University, Bangkok 10900, Thailand;<br />
J. Lanceras, Biotechnology Research and Development<br />
Center, Department of Agriculture, Chatuchak, Bangkok<br />
10900, Thailand.<br />
306 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
Association between amylose content and a microsatellite<br />
marker across exotic rice germplasm<br />
C.J. Bergman, R.G. Fjellstrom, and A.M. McClung<br />
A microsatellite sequence at the waxy gene of rice expla<strong>in</strong>s much of the variation <strong>in</strong> apparent amylose (AA) content of nonwaxy<br />
U.S. germplasm. S<strong>in</strong>ce the amylose content of breed<strong>in</strong>g l<strong>in</strong>es is typically evaluated across multiple years and locations, this<br />
microsatellite shows good promise for marker-aided selection of amylose content. Our study exam<strong>in</strong>ed the association between<br />
the microsatellite and AA us<strong>in</strong>g approximately 200 accessions from 53 countries. A previously unreported allele, (CT) 10<br />
,<br />
was found <strong>in</strong> accessions that had AA <strong>in</strong> low, <strong>in</strong>termediate, and high classes. A broader range <strong>in</strong> AA contents was identified for<br />
(CT) 20<br />
, (CT) 18<br />
, (CT) , and (CT) alleles than was previously reported. The variance of AA expla<strong>in</strong>ed by the microsatellite for<br />
16 8<br />
nonwaxy accessions and known mutants was 68%. The results <strong>in</strong>dicate that this microsatellite marker can be a useful method<br />
for predict<strong>in</strong>g the AA content class of a diversity of rice germplasm. However, the relationship of AA content with this microsatellite<br />
can be confounded by production environment and analytical methods for determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g AA, as well as by other genes and<br />
mutations that may occur <strong>in</strong> the genome.<br />
<strong>Rice</strong> end-use quality is largely <strong>in</strong>fluenced by its amylose content.<br />
Rapid analytical methods for determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g apparent amylose<br />
(AA) content have been used effectively for many years<br />
to screen breed<strong>in</strong>g progenies. However, <strong>in</strong> general, there is an<br />
<strong>in</strong>verse relationship between field temperatures dur<strong>in</strong>g gra<strong>in</strong><br />
ripen<strong>in</strong>g and AA. Thus, the environmental <strong>in</strong>fluence on AA<br />
can present problems when try<strong>in</strong>g to categorize breed<strong>in</strong>g l<strong>in</strong>es<br />
accord<strong>in</strong>g to their end-use quality classes. Consequently, breeders<br />
need to evaluate progenies across multiple years and locations<br />
to produce more accurate estimates of AA.<br />
A microsatellite at the waxy gene (Wx marker) of rice<br />
has been identified (Bligh et al 1995). Ayres et al (1997) found<br />
eight classes of (CT) n repeats at this microsatellite, which expla<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
a large portion of the variation <strong>in</strong> AA <strong>in</strong> nonwaxy U.S.<br />
rice. This marker has proven its usefulness <strong>in</strong> decreas<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
time for cultivar development with the release of the U.S. cultivars<br />
Cadet and Jac<strong>in</strong>to (McClung 1999).<br />
Our objective was to exam<strong>in</strong>e the association between<br />
the Wx marker and AA us<strong>in</strong>g rice germplasm of diverse orig<strong>in</strong><br />
and to determ<strong>in</strong>e its potential for use <strong>in</strong> varietal development<br />
programs that use <strong>in</strong>ternational accessions.<br />
Materials and methods<br />
Rough rice samples were obta<strong>in</strong>ed from the National Small<br />
Gra<strong>in</strong>s Collection of the U.S. Department of Agriculture-Agricultural<br />
Research Service (USDA-ARS), the <strong>International</strong><br />
<strong>Rice</strong> Germplasm Collection at <strong>IRRI</strong>, and the <strong>Rice</strong> Research<br />
Unit of the USDA-ARS. AA was determ<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> duplicate us<strong>in</strong>g<br />
a s<strong>in</strong>gle kernel of milled rice and is reported on an as-is<br />
basis (Kuo et al 1996). An assay for the Wx marker reported<br />
by Bergman et al (2000) was used to determ<strong>in</strong>e each accession’s<br />
microsatellite allele. Electrophoretic bands were scored us<strong>in</strong>g<br />
standards consist<strong>in</strong>g of three microsatellite classes <strong>in</strong> a s<strong>in</strong>gle<br />
lane, loaded several times across the gel.<br />
Results and discussion<br />
Accessions hav<strong>in</strong>g a broad diversity of orig<strong>in</strong>s were chosen to<br />
capture a wide degree of genetic variation. Also, accessions<br />
were <strong>in</strong>cluded with the widest possible variation <strong>in</strong> the follow<strong>in</strong>g<br />
end-use quality-related traits: AA, parboil<strong>in</strong>g loss, alkali<br />
spread<strong>in</strong>g value, and gra<strong>in</strong> shape. All microsatellite classes<br />
reported by Ayres et al (1997) were found, plus a previously<br />
unreported class, (CT) 10 (Fig. 1). Similar to the f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g by Ayres<br />
et al (1997), the relationship between AA and the microsatellite<br />
was strengthened by exclud<strong>in</strong>g waxy (glut<strong>in</strong>ous) accessions.<br />
Ayres et al (1997) reported 82.9% of the variance expla<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
for the AA content of 89 cultivars, primarily of U.S. orig<strong>in</strong>.<br />
Bergman et al (2000) reported that 88% of the variation <strong>in</strong> AA<br />
was expla<strong>in</strong>ed by the Wx marker <strong>in</strong> 199 nonwaxy breed<strong>in</strong>g<br />
l<strong>in</strong>es and cultivars <strong>in</strong> the 1999 U.S. uniform rice regional nursery.<br />
In our present study, the microsatellite expla<strong>in</strong>ed 60% of<br />
the variation <strong>in</strong> AA for 173 nonwaxy accessions.<br />
Several reasons could expla<strong>in</strong> why a reduced amount of<br />
variation <strong>in</strong> AA content was accounted for by the microsatellite<br />
<strong>in</strong> this study as compared with previous reports. This study<br />
<strong>in</strong>cluded greater genetic diversity as evidenced by the previously<br />
unreported (CT) 10 class, which <strong>in</strong>cludes accessions hav<strong>in</strong>g<br />
low, <strong>in</strong>termediate, and high levels of AA (Fig. 2). Several<br />
of the accessions <strong>in</strong> the (CT) 10 class are opaque mutants that<br />
have approximately 10% AA (Mikami et al 1999). As shown<br />
<strong>in</strong> Figure 2, the (CT) 16 allele was found <strong>in</strong> accessions hav<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>in</strong>termediate AA, whereas it was previously associated with<br />
only one waxy accession (Ayres et al 1997). Also, this broader<br />
set of germplasm was observed to be more divergent for AA<br />
<strong>in</strong> the (CT) 20 , (CT) 18 , and (CT) 8 classes than previously reported.<br />
The association of AA content with the Wx marker <strong>in</strong><br />
this study may have been reduced because of the very diverse<br />
environments <strong>in</strong> which the rice samples had been produced.<br />
With<strong>in</strong> a cultivar, AA is known to vary up to 6 percentage<br />
Molecular markers, QTL mapp<strong>in</strong>g, and marker-assisted selection 307
20 19 18 17 16 14 11 10 8<br />
Apparent amylose (%)<br />
35<br />
30<br />
25<br />
20<br />
15<br />
10<br />
5<br />
Fig. 1. Electrophoretic gel show<strong>in</strong>g n<strong>in</strong>e alleles<br />
for the waxy microsatellite associated with apparent<br />
amylose content. Bands are identified accord<strong>in</strong>g<br />
to the number of CT repeats.<br />
0<br />
8 10 11 14 16 17 18 19 20<br />
(CT)n<br />
Fig. 2. Apparent amylose content and (CT) n class of 197 accessions<br />
from 53 countries.<br />
po<strong>in</strong>ts because of production environment and analytical<br />
method (Juliano and Pascual 1980). Individual kernels on a<br />
panicle reportedly can vary up to 3.3 percentage po<strong>in</strong>ts <strong>in</strong> AA<br />
(Matsue et al 1994). Thus, a portion of the variance <strong>in</strong> AA<br />
may have also resulted from sampl<strong>in</strong>g error <strong>in</strong>troduced by analyz<strong>in</strong>g<br />
s<strong>in</strong>gle kernels versus bulked samples.<br />
The relationship of AA content with the Wx marker can<br />
be confounded by production environment and analytical methods<br />
for determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g AA, as well as by other genes and mutations<br />
that may occur <strong>in</strong> the genome. Consequently, before us<strong>in</strong>g<br />
the Wx marker to make selections, breeders should have<br />
good estimates of AA contents and knowledge of the (CT) n<br />
classes of their parental breed<strong>in</strong>g l<strong>in</strong>es. This study has also<br />
identified germplasm suitable for study<strong>in</strong>g the role the waxy<br />
gene plays <strong>in</strong> the control of AA and <strong>in</strong>stances <strong>in</strong> which AA<br />
may not be fully expla<strong>in</strong>ed by the waxy gene.<br />
References<br />
Ayres NM, McClung AM, Lark<strong>in</strong> PD, Bligh HFJ, Jones CA, Park<br />
WD. 1997. Microsatellites and a s<strong>in</strong>gle-nucleotide polymorphism<br />
differentiate apparent amylose classes <strong>in</strong> an extended<br />
pedigree of U.S. rice germplasm. Theor. Appl. Genet. 94:773-<br />
781.<br />
Bergman CJ, Delgado JT, Fjellstrom RG, McClung AM. 2000. Evaluation<br />
of breed<strong>in</strong>g l<strong>in</strong>es us<strong>in</strong>g a rapid method for a microsatellite<br />
associated with the waxy gene. Texas <strong>Rice</strong> Research and Education<br />
Program: Bottom L<strong>in</strong>e Report. Texas A&M University.<br />
Bligh HFJ, Till RI, Jones CA. 1995. A microsatellite sequence closely<br />
l<strong>in</strong>ked to the waxy gene of Oryza sativa. Euphytica 86:83-85.<br />
Juliano BO, Pascual CG. 1980. Quality characteristics of milled rice<br />
grown <strong>in</strong> different countries. <strong>IRRI</strong> Res. Paper Ser. 48. Los<br />
Baños (Philipp<strong>in</strong>es): <strong>International</strong> <strong>Rice</strong> Research Institute.<br />
25 p.<br />
Kuo YC, Webb BD, Stansel JW. 1996. Genetic study of milled rice<br />
amylose content by means of s<strong>in</strong>gle-gra<strong>in</strong> amylose analysis.<br />
J. Agric. Res. Ch<strong>in</strong>a 45:1-14.<br />
Matsue Y, Odahara K, Hiramatsu M. 1994. Differences <strong>in</strong> prote<strong>in</strong><br />
content, amylose content and palatability <strong>in</strong> relation to location<br />
of gra<strong>in</strong>s with<strong>in</strong> a rice panicle. Jpn. J. Crop Sci. 63:271-<br />
277.<br />
McClung AM. 1999. Development of rice varieties for conventional<br />
and niche markets: a historical perspective of breed<strong>in</strong>g for<br />
rice quality <strong>in</strong> the U.S. <strong>Rice</strong> Utilization Workshop, <strong>Rice</strong> Quality:<br />
Foundation for Value. USDA ARS and USA <strong>Rice</strong> Federation,<br />
11-12 March, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA.<br />
Mikami I, Munetoshi A, Hiro-Yuki H, Sano Y. 1999. Altered tissuespecific<br />
expression at the Wx gene of the opaque mutants <strong>in</strong><br />
rice. Euphytica 105:91-97.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ address: USDA-ARS <strong>Rice</strong> Research Unit, 1509 Aggie<br />
Drive, Beaumont, Texas 77713, USA.<br />
308 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
Molecular genetic analysis of quantitative trait loci related<br />
to rice gra<strong>in</strong> quality<br />
J.H. Lee, Y.S. Cho, K.H. Jung, M.T. Song, S.J. Yang, H.Y. Kim, and H.C. Choi<br />
This study was conducted to analyze quantitative trait loci (QTLs) for gra<strong>in</strong> quality. Recomb<strong>in</strong>ant <strong>in</strong>bred l<strong>in</strong>es (RILs) were<br />
developed by the s<strong>in</strong>gle-seed descent method of progenies derived from a cross between a japonica tongil hybrid cultivar,<br />
Nonganbyeo, and an <strong>in</strong>dica l<strong>in</strong>e, BG276. The 272 F 7<br />
<strong>in</strong>dividuals were used for DNA analysis us<strong>in</strong>g simple sequence repeat<br />
(SSR) and amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) markers. The molecular l<strong>in</strong>kage map of the QTLs related to gra<strong>in</strong><br />
quality was determ<strong>in</strong>ed. A total of 15 significant QTLs govern<strong>in</strong>g six characters were detected with a variation of one to four<br />
QTLs for the respective characters. However, no significant QTL was detected for gra<strong>in</strong> length. Two QTLs for gra<strong>in</strong> width were<br />
identified on chromosomes 1 and 8, four QTLs for gra<strong>in</strong> thickness on chromosomes 3, 7, 8, and 11, and two QTLs for gra<strong>in</strong><br />
length/width ratio on chromosomes 5 and 10, respectively. A total of four QTLs for alkali digestion value were detected on<br />
chromosomes 3, 7, 8, and 11 and three QTLs for amylose content on chromosomes 1, 6, and 11.<br />
Most l<strong>in</strong>kage maps developed with molecular markers such as<br />
restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP), random amplified<br />
polymorphic DNA (RAPD), simple sequence repeat<br />
(SSR), and amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP)<br />
are constructed us<strong>in</strong>g an F 2 population, backcross population,<br />
doubled-haploid l<strong>in</strong>e (DHL), or recomb<strong>in</strong>ant <strong>in</strong>bred l<strong>in</strong>e (RIL)<br />
derived from crosses between parents with a wide genetic distance.<br />
RILs have become more and more important for practical<br />
breed<strong>in</strong>g and their usefulness <strong>in</strong> basic genetic analysis. This<br />
study was carried out to construct a molecular genetic map of<br />
rice by DNA markers and QTL analysis of gra<strong>in</strong> quality traits<br />
us<strong>in</strong>g 272 F 7 RILs derived from crosses between tongil and<br />
<strong>in</strong>dica rice.<br />
Materials and methods<br />
A set of rice RILs was developed from a cross between tongil<br />
variety Nonganbyeo and <strong>in</strong>dica l<strong>in</strong>e BG276 by the s<strong>in</strong>gle-seed<br />
descent method. With 272 F 7 RILs, AFLP and SSR markers<br />
were generated for map construction. Gra<strong>in</strong> shape and gra<strong>in</strong><br />
quality traits, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g gra<strong>in</strong> length, width, thickness, and<br />
length/width ratio; alkali digestion value; and amylose content<br />
were measured follow<strong>in</strong>g the standard method of the Rural<br />
Development Adm<strong>in</strong>istration of Korea. DNA was extracted<br />
from the fresh young leaves of 272 RIL plants follow<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
procedures described <strong>in</strong> Causse et al (1994). The Mapmaker<br />
program was used to establish a molecular map at an LOD<br />
value of 3.0 and map distance expressed <strong>in</strong> Kosambi<br />
centiMorgans. The analyses of QTLs associated with markers<br />
for each trait were performed us<strong>in</strong>g one-way analysis of variance<br />
(ANOVA) from Data Desk 4.0 and <strong>in</strong>terval mapp<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><br />
the MAPMAKER/qGene 3.0 program. An LOD score of 2.0<br />
was used as the threshold for detect<strong>in</strong>g QTL location <strong>in</strong><br />
MAPMAKER/qGene.<br />
Results and discussion<br />
Figure 1 shows the frequency distribution of phenotypes for<br />
each trait <strong>in</strong> the RILs. Symmetrical normal distribution was<br />
observed for gra<strong>in</strong> length and gra<strong>in</strong> width, but a skewed frequency<br />
distribution was observed for gra<strong>in</strong> thickness, gra<strong>in</strong><br />
length/width ratio, and amylose content among the RILs. The<br />
alkali digestion value followed a bimodal distribution. This<br />
trait was controlled by one major QTL.<br />
The phenotypic values of some RILs were beyond the<br />
ranges of parental means for all traits. The occurrence of such<br />
transgressive segregants could be associated with the <strong>in</strong>teraction<br />
of complementary QTL alleles from two parents or overdom<strong>in</strong>ance<br />
of a gene. These phenotypic variations <strong>in</strong> our study<br />
were also reported by other QTL studies. Chang (1974) and<br />
L<strong>in</strong> and Chang (1981) reported that genes had different effects<br />
on phenotypic expression depend<strong>in</strong>g on different cross comb<strong>in</strong>ations.<br />
Somrith et al (1979) reported that gra<strong>in</strong> length was<br />
controlled by additive genetic effects and dom<strong>in</strong>ant effects,<br />
but gra<strong>in</strong> width was not related to any genetic effects. However,<br />
Ramiah and Parthasarthy (1982) reported that the <strong>in</strong>heritance<br />
of gra<strong>in</strong> length was controlled by multiple genes and<br />
there was a relationship between the genes for gra<strong>in</strong> length<br />
and gra<strong>in</strong> width.<br />
All 132 SSR and AFLP markers have been mapped on<br />
the RIL population. A set of 22 SSR loci was used to construct<br />
the framework assigned to the 12 chromosomes. The <strong>in</strong>tegration<br />
of AFLP onto the SSR map generated a map. The total<br />
length of the 12 l<strong>in</strong>kage groups spanned 1,234 cM, and the<br />
average length between markers was 9.4 cM.<br />
A total of 15 significant QTLs (LOD ≥2.0) govern<strong>in</strong>g<br />
five characters were detected, vary<strong>in</strong>g from 1 to 4 QTLs for<br />
the respective characters. However, no significant QTL was<br />
detected for gra<strong>in</strong> length (Fig. 2, Table 1).<br />
For gra<strong>in</strong> width, two putative QTLs, qGW1 and Qgw8,<br />
were associated with RM212 on chromosome 1 and A20-4 on<br />
chromosome 8, respectively. These two QTLs expla<strong>in</strong>ed 31.5%<br />
Molecular markers, QTL mapp<strong>in</strong>g, and marker-assisted selection 309
Frequency (%)<br />
80<br />
60<br />
P1 = 5.5 P2 = 6.5<br />
40<br />
20<br />
0<br />
4.2 4.8 5.4 6.0 6.6 7.2<br />
Gra<strong>in</strong> length (mm)<br />
50<br />
40<br />
P1 = 2.2 P2 = 2.6<br />
30<br />
20<br />
10<br />
0<br />
1.7 1.9 2.1 2.3 2.5 2.7 2.9<br />
Length/width ratio (%)<br />
80<br />
P2 = 2.5<br />
P1 = 2.4<br />
60<br />
40<br />
20<br />
0<br />
2.0 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.8 3.0<br />
Gra<strong>in</strong> width (mm)<br />
80<br />
60<br />
40<br />
20<br />
P1 = 2.0 P2 = 6.1<br />
0<br />
2.0 2.8 3.6 4.4 5.2 6.0 6.8<br />
Alkali digestion value<br />
60<br />
50<br />
40<br />
30<br />
20<br />
10<br />
0<br />
80<br />
60<br />
40<br />
20<br />
1.4<br />
P1 = 1.70<br />
P2 = 1.85<br />
1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.9 2.0<br />
Gra<strong>in</strong> thickness (mm)<br />
P1 = 15.8<br />
P2 = 24.5<br />
0<br />
12 14 16 18 20 22 24<br />
Amylose content (%)<br />
Fig. 1.Frequency distribution of gra<strong>in</strong> quality-related characters of 272 RILs and their parents, Nonganbyeo (P1)<br />
and BG276 (P2).<br />
of the total variation. Variation <strong>in</strong> gra<strong>in</strong> length was promoted<br />
by the BG276 alleles <strong>in</strong> the homologous state of qGW1 and<br />
by the Nonganbyeo alleles of qGW8.<br />
Four putative QTLs were mapped for gra<strong>in</strong> thickness on<br />
chromosomes 3, 7, 8, and 11, respectively. The simultaneous<br />
fit of the four QTLs expla<strong>in</strong>ed 62.1% of the total phenotypic<br />
variation.<br />
For gra<strong>in</strong> length/width ratio, two putative QTLs, with<br />
qLWR5 and qLWR10, accounted for 45.6% of the total phenotypic<br />
variation. They were located near RM249 and A8-4<br />
on chromosome 5 and near A14-6 and RM258 on chromosome<br />
10, respectively. BG276 alleles <strong>in</strong>creased gra<strong>in</strong> length/<br />
width ratio.<br />
Four putative QTLs were mapped for alkali digestion<br />
value on chromosomes 3, 7, 8, and 11, respectively. The percentage<br />
of phenotypic variance expla<strong>in</strong>ed by each QTL ranged<br />
from 8.1% to 42.0%. The simultaneous fit of the four QTLs<br />
expla<strong>in</strong>ed 70.0% of the total phenotypic variation.<br />
For amylose content, three putative QTLs, qAM1,<br />
qAM6, and qAM11, were associated with A19-4 on chromosome<br />
1, RM217 on chromosome 6, and A20-16 on chromosome<br />
11, respectively. These three QTLs expla<strong>in</strong>ed 79.5% of<br />
the total variation. Amylose content was promoted by the<br />
BG276 alleles <strong>in</strong> the homozygous state.<br />
A total of 15 putative QTLs for gra<strong>in</strong> length, width, thickness,<br />
and length/width ratio; alkali digestion value; and amylose<br />
content were detected on eight chromosomes. N<strong>in</strong>e out of<br />
15 putative QTLs detected <strong>in</strong> this study were contributed by<br />
BG276.<br />
References<br />
Causse P, Fulton TM, Cho YG, Ahn SN, Chunwongse J, Wu K,<br />
Xiao J, Yu PC, Ronald SE, Harr<strong>in</strong>gton SE, Second G,<br />
McCouch SR, Tanksley SD. 1994. Saturated molecular map<br />
of the rice genome based on <strong>in</strong>terspecific backcross populations.<br />
<strong>Genetics</strong> 138:1251-1274.<br />
Chang TT. 1974. Studies on the <strong>in</strong>heritance of gra<strong>in</strong> shape of rice.<br />
Taiwan Agric. Res. 23:9-15.<br />
L<strong>in</strong> MH, Chang TT. 1981. Inheritance of agronomic traits and character<br />
association <strong>in</strong> crosses between dryland and wetland cultivars<br />
of rice. SABRAO J. 13(1):11-13.<br />
Ramiah K, Parthasarthy N. 1982. Inheritance of gra<strong>in</strong> length <strong>in</strong> rice.<br />
Ind. J. Agric. Sci. 3(5):808-819.<br />
Somrith B, Chang TT, Jackson BR. 1979. Genetic analysis of traits<br />
related to gra<strong>in</strong> characteristics and quality <strong>in</strong> two crosses of<br />
rice. Research Paper Series No. 35. Los Baños (Philipp<strong>in</strong>es):<br />
<strong>International</strong> <strong>Rice</strong> Research Institute.<br />
Tsunematsu H, Yoshimura AM, Iwata N. 1996. QTL analysis us<strong>in</strong>g<br />
RI l<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong> rice. <strong>Rice</strong> genetics III. Manila (Philipp<strong>in</strong>es): <strong>International</strong><br />
<strong>Rice</strong> Research Institute. p 619-623.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ address: National Crop Experiment Station, Rural Development<br />
Adm<strong>in</strong>istration, 441-100 Suwon, Korea.<br />
ljh@nces.go.kr.<br />
310 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
cM<br />
0<br />
A6-2<br />
A1-3<br />
A1-4<br />
A17-11<br />
A9-10<br />
RM249<br />
A9-3<br />
50<br />
100<br />
150<br />
A18-1<br />
A16-5<br />
A21-2<br />
A14-16<br />
RM238A<br />
A19-9<br />
RM212<br />
A19-4<br />
A21-7<br />
A11-6<br />
A20-8<br />
A14-9<br />
Chr 2<br />
A18-10<br />
RM263<br />
A20-15<br />
A15-1<br />
A18-4<br />
RM240<br />
A14-7<br />
A14-8<br />
A17-4<br />
A20-7<br />
A17-8<br />
A17-7<br />
A18-7<br />
RM218<br />
A20-3<br />
A20-2<br />
A9-2<br />
A11-5<br />
A21-5<br />
RM22<br />
A14-14<br />
A9-9<br />
A18-5<br />
RM241<br />
A17-7<br />
A17-14<br />
A11-1<br />
A12-14<br />
A12-12<br />
A8-4<br />
A8-2<br />
A5-6<br />
RM164<br />
A15-4<br />
A7-2<br />
A19-6<br />
A21-12<br />
A16-14<br />
Chr 5<br />
Chr 6<br />
A6-9<br />
A5-10<br />
A5-8<br />
A11-2<br />
RM217<br />
A3-5<br />
A10-4<br />
A13-3<br />
200<br />
A14-17-6<br />
A20-6<br />
A17-13<br />
RM23<br />
A5-1<br />
Chr 1<br />
Chr 3<br />
A20-14<br />
A15-5<br />
A3-4<br />
A18-3<br />
A7-1<br />
RM261<br />
A15-7<br />
A10-7<br />
A16-3<br />
Chr 4<br />
cM<br />
0<br />
A5-9<br />
A14-4<br />
A4-1<br />
A14-6<br />
A12-9<br />
RM247<br />
A20-5<br />
RM258<br />
50<br />
100<br />
A3-2<br />
A16-7<br />
A17-10<br />
RM234<br />
RM18<br />
A6-3<br />
A14-13<br />
A20-4<br />
A5-3<br />
A3-1<br />
A2-2<br />
A20-3<br />
A11-4<br />
A21-11<br />
A17-9<br />
Chr 8<br />
Chr 9<br />
A18-11<br />
RM242<br />
RM257<br />
RM215<br />
Chr 10<br />
A16-9<br />
A16-10<br />
A18-6<br />
A14-5<br />
A12-13<br />
A10-6<br />
A19-5<br />
A21-9<br />
A10-2<br />
RM21<br />
A6-5<br />
RM206<br />
A16-13<br />
RM211<br />
A14-10<br />
A20-9<br />
A4-3<br />
A5-2<br />
Chr 12<br />
A20-16<br />
150<br />
A17-5<br />
Chr 7<br />
Gra<strong>in</strong> width<br />
Gra<strong>in</strong> thickness<br />
Gra<strong>in</strong> length/width ratio<br />
Alkali digestion value<br />
Amylose<br />
Chr 11<br />
A15-2<br />
Fig. 2.QTLs for gra<strong>in</strong> quality mapped on RILs derived from Nonganbyeo/BG276.<br />
Molecular markers, QTL mapp<strong>in</strong>g, and marker-assisted selection 311
Table 1. QTLs detected for gra<strong>in</strong> quality traits <strong>in</strong> RILs derived from Nonganbyeo/BG276.<br />
Trait QTLs Interval Peak Variation Phenotypic<br />
LOD expla<strong>in</strong>ed (%) effect<br />
Gra<strong>in</strong> length nd a – – – –<br />
Gra<strong>in</strong> width qGW1 RM212–A19-4 2.83 17.0 –0.2<br />
qGW8 A20-4–A5-3 2.19 14.5 0.1<br />
Gra<strong>in</strong> thickness qGT3 A9-2–A-11-5 4.21 16.6 –0.1<br />
qGT7 RM234–RM18 2.58 7.1 –0.0<br />
qGT8 A11-4–A21-11 3.61 8.4 0.0<br />
qGT11 A10-2–RM21 4.24 30.0 0.3<br />
Length/width ratio qLWR5 RM249–A8-4 4.16 25.9 0.5<br />
qLWR10 A14-6–RM258 3.15 19.7 0.2<br />
Alkali digestion value qADV3 A9-2–A11-5 6.37 9.1 –1.3<br />
qADV7 A3-2–A16-7 5.71 10.8 1.1<br />
qADV8 A14-13–A20-4 8.11 42.0 –3.5<br />
qADV11 A16-13–RM211 4.76 8.1 –3.1<br />
Amylose content qAM1 A19-4–A21-7 2.86 17.5 1.5<br />
qAM6 RM217–A3-5 4.62 45.4 2.9<br />
qAM11 A20-16–A15-2 2.32 16.6 1.0<br />
a nd = not detected.<br />
Leaf senescence of a newly <strong>in</strong>duced stay-green mutant<br />
and mapp<strong>in</strong>g of the gene <strong>in</strong> rice<br />
K.W. Cha, Y.J. Won, and H.J. Koh<br />
A “stay-green” mutant was <strong>in</strong>duced through a chemical mutagen, N-methyl-N-nitrosourea (MNU), <strong>in</strong> a japonica rice l<strong>in</strong>e,<br />
Hwacheong-wx. Leaves of the mutant rema<strong>in</strong>ed deep green until harvest<strong>in</strong>g stage, when leaves of the normal type turned<br />
yellow because of senescence. The stay-green trait was stably expressed under different environments. Agronomic characteristics<br />
of the mutant were the same as those of the orig<strong>in</strong>al l<strong>in</strong>e except for the greenness of the plants. The mutant differed from<br />
the orig<strong>in</strong>al l<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> chlorophyll a/b ratio along with leaf position and growth stages. The stay-green trait was controlled by a s<strong>in</strong>gle<br />
recessive gene, which was tentatively symbolized as sgr(t). The sgr(t) gene was located on chromosome 9. Two SSR markers,<br />
RM242 and RM257, were l<strong>in</strong>ked with sgr(t) by 18 cM and 28 cM, respectively. A RAPD band of 1.2 kb amplified with OPI-9 was<br />
also l<strong>in</strong>ked to the sgr(t) gene by 17.5 cM. The l<strong>in</strong>kage order was OPI-9–sgr(t)–RM242–RM257.<br />
Senescence that occurs at the end of the plant’s life cycle is<br />
considered a process of apoptosis for optimized material mobilization<br />
and/or for the growth of reproductive organs<br />
(Kawasaki 1992). The most conspicuous change that occurs<br />
dur<strong>in</strong>g this process is chlorophyll degradation, which is frequently<br />
used as an <strong>in</strong>dex of leaf senescence. Variation <strong>in</strong> leaf<br />
senescence is affected by environmental factors. Several naturally<br />
occurr<strong>in</strong>g variants that exhibit delayed senescence have<br />
been reported (Thomas and Smart 1993). We developed a staygreen<br />
mutant by us<strong>in</strong>g a chemical mutagen, N-methyl-Nnitrosourea<br />
(MNU), to fertilize egg cells of Hwacheong-wx<br />
l<strong>in</strong>e, an <strong>in</strong>duced mutant l<strong>in</strong>e from Korean japonica rice variety<br />
Hwacheongbyeo. This study was conducted to <strong>in</strong>vestigate the<br />
mutant phenotype and to locate the gene govern<strong>in</strong>g stay-greenness<br />
<strong>in</strong> the mutant.<br />
Materials and methods<br />
The stay-green mutant was selected <strong>in</strong> the M 2 population and<br />
was advanced to a homozygous l<strong>in</strong>e. The mutant l<strong>in</strong>e used was<br />
Hwacheong-wx-B-24-8-2-1-1 from the M 7 generation.<br />
Hwacheongbyeo, Hwacheong-wx l<strong>in</strong>e, the stay-green mutant<br />
l<strong>in</strong>e, and some other varieties were grown under normal field<br />
management conditions and were evaluated for agronomic<br />
characters, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g chlorophyll content of leaves.<br />
DNA was extracted from the leaves of the mutant, the<br />
orig<strong>in</strong>al l<strong>in</strong>e, and eight other varieties. The mutant was crossed<br />
with Milyang23 and DNA was extracted from the leaves of<br />
each F 2 plant and the parent. To prelim<strong>in</strong>arily screen the l<strong>in</strong>kage<br />
of the gene, the bulked segregant analysis method was<br />
adopted (Michelmore et al 1991, Koh et al 1996). An analysis<br />
of microsatellite and random amplified polymorphic DNA<br />
(RAPD) markers for mapp<strong>in</strong>g was carried out accord<strong>in</strong>g to<br />
the protocol described <strong>in</strong> Panaud et al (1996) and Ahn et al<br />
312 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
Table 1. Comparison of agronomic characteristics between the stay-green mutant and the orig<strong>in</strong>al l<strong>in</strong>e.<br />
L<strong>in</strong>e Head<strong>in</strong>g Culm Panicle Panicles Spikelets Gra<strong>in</strong> 1,000- Yield Gra<strong>in</strong> dimension (mm)<br />
date length length hill –1 panicle –1 fertility gra<strong>in</strong> wt. hill –1<br />
(cm) (cm) (no.) (no.) (%) (mg) (g) Length Width Thickness<br />
Hwacheongbyeo 17 Aug 89.0 18.7 17.3 129.0 92.9 21.7 45.0 – – –<br />
Hwacheong-wx 18 Aug 93.7 21.4 17.0 120.7 91.2 20.3 38.0 4.7 2.7 1.93<br />
Mutant 18 Aug 93.3 20.8 17.5 129.5 92.7 20.5 43.0 4.7 2.7 1.93<br />
Flag leaf<br />
Chlorophyll (mg g –1 DW)<br />
22<br />
20<br />
18<br />
16<br />
14<br />
12<br />
10<br />
86420<br />
Hwacheong<br />
Hwa-wx<br />
Mutant<br />
Ilpum<br />
M23<br />
IR36<br />
Second leaf<br />
22<br />
20<br />
18<br />
16<br />
14<br />
12<br />
10<br />
86420<br />
Chlorophyll a/b<br />
4.0<br />
3.5<br />
3.0<br />
2.5<br />
2.0<br />
1.5<br />
1.0<br />
0.5<br />
0<br />
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70<br />
Hwa-wx<br />
Mutant<br />
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70<br />
Days after head<strong>in</strong>g<br />
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70<br />
4.0<br />
3.5<br />
3.0<br />
2.5<br />
2.0<br />
1.5<br />
1.0<br />
0.5<br />
0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70<br />
Days after head<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Fig. 1. Changes <strong>in</strong> chlorophyll<br />
content and chlorophyll<br />
a/b ratio of leaves<br />
after head<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
(1998). L<strong>in</strong>kage analysis was conducted us<strong>in</strong>g Mapmaker computer<br />
software. Map distances were estimated us<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
Kosambi function (Kosambi 1944).<br />
Results and discussion<br />
The leaves of the orig<strong>in</strong>al l<strong>in</strong>e turned yellow, but those of the<br />
mutant rema<strong>in</strong>ed deep green (60 d after head<strong>in</strong>g), which dried<br />
to a greenish white color without yellow<strong>in</strong>g. No significant<br />
difference <strong>in</strong> agronomic characters was observed between the<br />
mutant and orig<strong>in</strong>al l<strong>in</strong>e (Table 1). When the mutant and orig<strong>in</strong>al<br />
l<strong>in</strong>e were f<strong>in</strong>gerpr<strong>in</strong>ted with 85 microsatellite markers, they<br />
showed 100% genetic similarity, <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g that the mutant<br />
could have been <strong>in</strong>duced through po<strong>in</strong>t mutation from the orig<strong>in</strong>al<br />
l<strong>in</strong>e.<br />
The chlorophyll content of the leaves was measured at<br />
5-d <strong>in</strong>tervals after head<strong>in</strong>g (Fig. 1). The chlorophyll content of<br />
the mutant was the same as that of the orig<strong>in</strong>al l<strong>in</strong>e and similar<br />
to that of other varieties at the tiller<strong>in</strong>g and flower<strong>in</strong>g stages.<br />
As gra<strong>in</strong> fill<strong>in</strong>g proceeded, the chlorophyll content of the checks<br />
and the orig<strong>in</strong>al l<strong>in</strong>e was greatly reduced <strong>in</strong> both flag and second<br />
leaves as expected. The reduction rate was accelerated 25<br />
to 35 d after head<strong>in</strong>g depend<strong>in</strong>g on variety. The chlorophyll<br />
content was nearly negligible 50 to 60 d after head<strong>in</strong>g. The<br />
reduction rate of chlorophyll content <strong>in</strong> the mutant was much<br />
slower even after 30 d from head<strong>in</strong>g. Some amount of chlorophyll<br />
rema<strong>in</strong>ed till senescence, keep<strong>in</strong>g the leaves green until<br />
damaged by low temperature. The chlorophyll a/b ratio of<br />
leaves of the mutant was similar to that of a normal l<strong>in</strong>e dur<strong>in</strong>g<br />
the ripen<strong>in</strong>g stage (Fig. 1). However, the chlorophyll a/b ratio<br />
of a normal l<strong>in</strong>e at 20 and 50–55 d after head<strong>in</strong>g fluctuated<br />
steeply.<br />
The <strong>in</strong>heritance mode of the stay-green trait was studied<br />
<strong>in</strong> F 1 and F 2 populations from crosses between the stay-green<br />
mutant and some cultivars (Table 2). In the F 1 , all the plants<br />
from every cross showed normal senescence. In F 2 populations,<br />
the segregation ratio of normal:stay-green fitted the 3:1<br />
ratio, <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g that a s<strong>in</strong>gle recessive gene controlled the staygreen<br />
trait of the mutant. It was tentatively labeled as sgr(t).<br />
Molecular markers, QTL mapp<strong>in</strong>g, and marker-assisted selection 313
Table 2. Segregation of stay-green characteristics <strong>in</strong> F 1 and F 2 populations from crosses between<br />
the stay-green mutant and rice cultivars.<br />
F 1 F 2<br />
Cross comb<strong>in</strong>ation Total X 2 P<br />
Normal Stay-green Normal Stay-green (3:1)<br />
Mutant/Hwacheongbyeo 9 0 250 94 344 0.99 0.1–0.5<br />
Mutant/Ilpumbyeo 9 0 192 57 249 0.59 0.5–0.9<br />
Mutant/Milyang 23 9 0 129 35 164 1.17 0.1–0.5<br />
Mutant/Dasanbyeo 9 0 179 59 238 0.01 >0.9<br />
Mutant/IR8 9 0 211 51 262 4.28 0.1–0.5<br />
Mutant/IR24 9 0 146 54 200 0.43 0.5–0.9<br />
Mutant/CP-SLO 9 0 153 42 195 1.25 0.5–0.9<br />
RM257<br />
RM242<br />
sgr(t)<br />
OPI-9<br />
As a result of bulked segregant analysis, two<br />
microsatellite markers, RM242 and RM257, and one RAPD<br />
marker, OPI-9, were found to be l<strong>in</strong>ked to the sgr(t) locus.<br />
Us<strong>in</strong>g an F 2 population of mutant/Milyang23, the stay-green<br />
gene sgr(t) was mapped on chromosome 9 (Fig. 2). The sgr(t)<br />
gene was l<strong>in</strong>ked to OPI-9, by 17.5 cM, and to RM242 and<br />
RM257, by 18 cM and 28 cM, respectively. The l<strong>in</strong>kage order<br />
was OPI-9–sgr(t)–RM242–RM257. In addition, the mutant was<br />
crossed with a l<strong>in</strong>kage tester with a marker gene, Dn-1 (Dense<br />
panicle-1), of chromosome 9. The crossover value between<br />
sgr(t) and Dn-1 was 26%.<br />
cM<br />
10.0<br />
18.0<br />
17.5<br />
Chromosome 9<br />
Fig. 2. Mapp<strong>in</strong>g of the stay-green<br />
gene sgr(t) on chromosome 9.<br />
References<br />
Ahn SN, Kwak TS, Kang KH, Jeon YH, Choi HC, Moon HP. 1998.<br />
Relationship between heterosis and measured by RAPDs<br />
analysis <strong>in</strong> rice. Kor. J. Breed 30(1):16-23.<br />
Kawasaki S. 1992. Analysis of leaf senescence through mutation<br />
and aff<strong>in</strong>ity-label<strong>in</strong>g. Gamma Field Symposium. No. 31.<br />
Koh HJ, Heu MH, McCouch SR. 1996. Molecular mapp<strong>in</strong>g of the<br />
ge s gene controll<strong>in</strong>g the super-giant embryo character <strong>in</strong> rice<br />
(Oryza sativa L.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 92:257-261.<br />
Kosambi DD. 1944. The estimation of map distances from recomb<strong>in</strong>ation<br />
values. Ann. Eugenet. 12:172-175.<br />
Michelmore RW, Paran I, Kesseli KV. 1991. Identification of markers<br />
l<strong>in</strong>ked to disease resistance genes by bulked segregant<br />
analysis: a rapid method to detect markers <strong>in</strong> specific genomic<br />
regions by us<strong>in</strong>g segregat<strong>in</strong>g populations. Proc. Natl. Acad.<br />
Sci. USA 88:9828-9832.<br />
Panaud O, Chen X, McCouch SR. 1996. Development of<br />
microsatellite markers and characterization of simple sequence<br />
length polymorphism (SSLP) <strong>in</strong> rice (Oryza sativa L.). Mol.<br />
Gen. Genet. 252:597-607.<br />
Thomas H, Smart CM. 1993. Crops that stay green. Ann. Appl. Biol.<br />
123:193-219.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ address: School of Plant Science, College of Agricultural<br />
and Life Sciences, Seoul National University, Suwon 441-<br />
744, Korea.<br />
Mapp<strong>in</strong>g the rt (root growth-<strong>in</strong>hibit<strong>in</strong>g) gene<br />
of rice by RFLP markers<br />
M. Miwa, Y. Inukai, K. Satoh, M. Itoh, Y. Katayama, M. Ashikari, M. Matsuoka, and H. Kitano<br />
Despite the many important roles of the plant root, the study of root growth and development has not received as much<br />
attention as that of aerial organs, particularly at the molecular and genetic levels. To understand the genetic mechanism of root<br />
growth, we studied the rice root growth-<strong>in</strong>hibit<strong>in</strong>g mutant (rt mutant). A previous study revealed that a recessive rt gene<br />
controll<strong>in</strong>g the mutant phenotype primarily disturbs the normal formation of root epidermal systems. Thus, we tried to isolate<br />
the rt gene us<strong>in</strong>g molecular markers. Prelim<strong>in</strong>ary results showed that the rt gene is located between RFLP markers C335 and<br />
R3351 on the long arm of chromosome 4.<br />
314 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
A B C D<br />
E F G<br />
*<br />
*<br />
Fig. 1. Phenotype of rt mutant<br />
plants. (A and B) Seedl<strong>in</strong>g at 7thleaf<br />
stage of Fukei 71 (A) and rt<br />
mutant (B). (C and D) Primary root<br />
of Fukei 71 (C) and rt mutant (D).<br />
Arrow shows root hair. Arrowhead<br />
shows lateral root. Longitud<strong>in</strong>al<br />
sections of Fukei 71 (E) and rt<br />
mutant (F and G). Asterisks show<br />
stripped epidermal cells. Bar <strong>in</strong><br />
A, B = 5 cm, <strong>in</strong> E, F, and G = 100<br />
mm. Kitano and Futsuhara<br />
(1989).<br />
The plant root is <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> acquir<strong>in</strong>g water and nutrients,<br />
anchor<strong>in</strong>g the plant body, synthesiz<strong>in</strong>g plant hormones, storage<br />
functions, and <strong>in</strong>teract<strong>in</strong>g with some soil microbes. Despite<br />
the importance of such unique aspects of the root, the<br />
molecular and genetic study of this organ has not been pursued<br />
as vigorously as the development of aerial plant organs.<br />
Genetic variations <strong>in</strong> root morphology have been described <strong>in</strong><br />
more than 30 plant species (O’Toole and Bland 1987). However,<br />
most of these examples <strong>in</strong>volved polygenic variation. The<br />
isolation of s<strong>in</strong>gle-gene mutants has been hampered by various<br />
environmental factors through root growth and development<br />
under the ground. Therefore, root mutants are particularly<br />
rare <strong>in</strong> rice. We studied the rice root mutant rt detected<br />
by Futsuhara and Kitano (1985) and isolated it us<strong>in</strong>g molecular<br />
markers.<br />
Materials and methods<br />
The rt mutant was found <strong>in</strong> the M 2 progenies of a dwarf mutant<br />
l<strong>in</strong>e, Fukei 71, treated with 0.3% solution of ethylenim<strong>in</strong>e<br />
for 2 h at 30 ºC (Futsuhara and Kitano 1985). To characterize<br />
the mutant’s root morphology, histological observations were<br />
carried out us<strong>in</strong>g longitud<strong>in</strong>al th<strong>in</strong> 5-mm sections of sem<strong>in</strong>al<br />
root tips of both the rt mutant and Fukei 71.<br />
The trisomic testers derived from a japonica rice cultivar,<br />
K<strong>in</strong>maze, were crossed with the rt mutant to detect the<br />
chromosome number on which the mutant gene is located.<br />
Further, the rt mutant was crossed with an <strong>in</strong>dica rice cultivar,<br />
Kasalath, for f<strong>in</strong>e mapp<strong>in</strong>g based on molecular markers. About<br />
2,000 F 2 seedl<strong>in</strong>gs express<strong>in</strong>g the rt phenotype were selected<br />
and transplanted <strong>in</strong>to the paddy field for DNA extraction and<br />
l<strong>in</strong>kage analysis.<br />
The benzyl chloride method (Heng Zhu et al 1993) was<br />
used for extract<strong>in</strong>g total DNA from rice leaves. The extracted<br />
DNA was digested with a restriction enzyme. Five grams of<br />
each digested DNA were loaded on 0.7% agarose gel and run<br />
for 16 h at 220 V and then blotted onto a nylon membrane.<br />
Southern hybridization was done with horseradish peroxidaselabeled<br />
restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP)<br />
markers accord<strong>in</strong>g to the protocol for the enhanced chemilum<strong>in</strong>escent<br />
(ECL)-directed nucleic acid label<strong>in</strong>g and detection<br />
system (Amersham Pharmacia). RFLP markers were provided<br />
by the <strong>Rice</strong> Genome Research Program (RGP).<br />
Results and discussion<br />
In the model plant Arabidopsis, research on root growth and<br />
development us<strong>in</strong>g molecular genetic approaches has been well<br />
advanced. Studies on pattern<strong>in</strong>g of tissue and cell types of the<br />
root, and on controll<strong>in</strong>g root morphogenesis, are done largely<br />
us<strong>in</strong>g various root mutants such as rhd3 and scr (Wysocka-<br />
Diller et al 2000). However, there are only a few reports on<br />
root mutants <strong>in</strong> rice. The study of root growth and development<br />
<strong>in</strong> rice, particularly at the molecular level, has lagged<br />
beh<strong>in</strong>d. We studied a root mutant (rt mutant) with a remarkably<br />
reduced root growth (Fig. 1B) to obta<strong>in</strong> genetic <strong>in</strong>formation<br />
on rice root growth and development (Futsuhara and<br />
Kitano 1985).<br />
Molecular markers, QTL mapp<strong>in</strong>g, and marker-assisted selection 315
71.2<br />
72.6<br />
76.7<br />
81.9<br />
83.2<br />
Position<br />
(cM)<br />
4S<br />
rt<br />
Marker<br />
L353<br />
SS13322<br />
C335<br />
R3351<br />
EH1171<br />
<strong>in</strong>g m<strong>in</strong>imum growth and physiological functions of the root<br />
system even though its epidermis was lack<strong>in</strong>g. In contrast, the<br />
radicle <strong>in</strong> the mature embryo of the mutant showed a normal<br />
morphology (data not shown), suggest<strong>in</strong>g that the rt gene could<br />
act only <strong>in</strong> the grow<strong>in</strong>g root after germ<strong>in</strong>ation.<br />
Although it became clear that the rt gene affects root<br />
morphogenesis, other specific functions of this gene are still<br />
obscure. Thus, we tried to isolate the rt gene us<strong>in</strong>g molecular<br />
markers. Trisomic analysis to detect the chromosome number<br />
of the mutant gene location showed an abnormal segregation<br />
ratio that suggested that the rt gene is located on chromosome<br />
4 (data not shown). We devised a strategy to isolate the rt gene<br />
by an RFLP-based chromosome-walk<strong>in</strong>g technique us<strong>in</strong>g about<br />
260 F 2 homozygous plants express<strong>in</strong>g the mutant phenotype.<br />
Results of l<strong>in</strong>kage analysis between rt and some molecular<br />
markers on chromosome 4 showed that the rt gene was located<br />
between markers C335 and R3351 on the long arm of<br />
chromosome 4 (Fig. 2). We also selected to get recomb<strong>in</strong>ants<br />
with<strong>in</strong> these RFLP markers us<strong>in</strong>g cleaved amplified polymorphic<br />
sequence (CAPS) analysis. By us<strong>in</strong>g CAPS primers<br />
(EH1171 and SS13322, see Fig. 2), we selected many recomb<strong>in</strong>ants<br />
between CAPS markers from about 2,000 rt homozygous<br />
F 2 plants. We will select recomb<strong>in</strong>ant plants with<strong>in</strong> RFLP<br />
markers (C335 and R3351) us<strong>in</strong>g other molecular markers and<br />
establish the physical map to f<strong>in</strong>ally isolate this gene.<br />
97.9<br />
4L<br />
C1100<br />
Fig. 2. RFLP and CAPS map of the genomic<br />
region around rt on rice chromosome 4. The<br />
rt gene is located between C335 and<br />
R3351. EH1171 and SS13322 are CAPS<br />
markers. Other markers are RFLP. S and L<br />
= short and long arm, respectively.<br />
The root system of the rt mutant was very compact because<br />
of excessive <strong>in</strong>hibition of both sem<strong>in</strong>al and crown root<br />
growth. Histological observations on the root tip of the mutant<br />
showed that the mutant epidermis was obviously abnormal and<br />
stripped off from the cortex <strong>in</strong> the meristematic region. Its<br />
epidermis was almost lack<strong>in</strong>g on the surface of the upper side<br />
of the root (Fig. 1G), result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> only a few root hairs occurr<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>in</strong> the upper part of the grow<strong>in</strong>g root (Fig. 1C, D). However,<br />
cell divisions and cell differentiations <strong>in</strong> the root apical<br />
meristems of the mutant were nearly normal (Fig. 1E, F). These<br />
suggested that the root of the mutant was capable of ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>-<br />
References<br />
Futsuhara Y, Kitano H. 1985. Inheritance of a root growth-<strong>in</strong>hibit<strong>in</strong>g<br />
mutant <strong>in</strong> rice. <strong>Rice</strong> Genet. Newsl. 2:70-71.<br />
Heng Zhu, Qu F, Zhu L. 1993. Isolation of genomic DNAs from<br />
plants, fungi, and bacteria us<strong>in</strong>g benzyl chloride. Nucleic Acids<br />
Res. 21:5279-5280.<br />
O’Toole J, Bland W. 1987. Genotypic variation <strong>in</strong> crop plant root<br />
systems. Adv. Agron. 41:91-145.<br />
Wysocka-Diller J, Helariutta Y, Fukaki H, Malamy J, Benfey P. 2000.<br />
Molecular analysis of SCARECROW function reveals a radial<br />
pattern<strong>in</strong>g mechanism common to root and shoot. Development<br />
127:595-603.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ addresses: M. Miwa, Y. Inukai, H. Kitano, Graduate School<br />
of Bioagricultural Sciences; M. Itoh, M. Ashikari, M.<br />
Matsuoka, Bioscience Center, Nagoya University; K. Satoh,<br />
Y. Katayama, Graduate School of Bio-Applications and Systems<br />
Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g, University of Agriculture and Technology.<br />
316 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
Tagg<strong>in</strong>g and mapp<strong>in</strong>g of a new elongated-uppermost<strong>in</strong>ternode<br />
gene—eui2(t)—us<strong>in</strong>g AFLP, RFLP, and SSR<br />
techniques<br />
S.L. Yang, R.C. Yang, X.P. Qu, H.L. Ma, Q.Q. Zhang, S.B. Zhang, and R.H. Huang<br />
A new elongated-uppermost-<strong>in</strong>ternode gene, eui2(t), was identified from a mutant, XQZeB-2. Us<strong>in</strong>g AFLP and bulked segregant<br />
pools from F 3<br />
progenies of the cross XQZeB-2/Aijiaonante, approximately 8,960 AFLP loci were screened with 128<br />
primer comb<strong>in</strong>ations. Four polymorphic AFLP products were identified and designated as EM436, EM444, EM521, and EM527,<br />
respectively. Among them, EM521 was tightly l<strong>in</strong>ked to the eui2(t) gene by segregation analysis. EM521 was mapped on<br />
chromosome 10. Meanwhile, four SSR markers, RM258, RM269, RM271, and RM304, with a genetic distance to eui2 of<br />
12.0, 12.9, 33.1, and 1.4 cM, respectively, were screened by microsatellite analysis. The results of microsatellite analysis and<br />
the mapp<strong>in</strong>g of AFLP marker EM521 confirmed that eui2(t) was located <strong>in</strong> the middle of the long arm of chromosome 10. The<br />
identification of the eui2(t) gene makes it possible to develop hybrid rice with sterile (A) and restorer l<strong>in</strong>es (R) possess<strong>in</strong>g<br />
different eui genes simultaneously, which would result <strong>in</strong> a reduced application of GA 3<br />
for both parental l<strong>in</strong>es.<br />
Rutger and Carnahan (1981) reported that the elongation of<br />
the uppermost <strong>in</strong>ternode was controlled by a recessive gene,<br />
eui. They predicted that, as far as A, B, and restorer l<strong>in</strong>es are<br />
concerned, the eui gene would be the fourth element for seed<br />
production of hybrid rice. Many studies used the eui gene <strong>in</strong><br />
hybrid rice breed<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the past 20 years. Virmani et al (1988)<br />
transferred the eui gene to IR50 (<strong>in</strong>dica) by backcross<strong>in</strong>g and<br />
designated the progeny as restorer l<strong>in</strong>e IR50eui. Shen et al<br />
(1987) developed a new CMS l<strong>in</strong>e—Zhenchang A—without<br />
panicle enclosure by <strong>in</strong>troduc<strong>in</strong>g the eui gene <strong>in</strong>to Zhenshan<br />
97A. Librojo and Khush (1986) located the eui gene on chromosome<br />
5 through the use of primary trisomics. Wu et al (1998)<br />
screened a restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP)<br />
marker, RG435, l<strong>in</strong>ked to the eui gene with a genetic distance<br />
of 33.6 cM. In 1998, we identified two types of mutants possess<strong>in</strong>g<br />
an elongated uppermost <strong>in</strong>ternode and designated the<br />
two mutants as Xieq<strong>in</strong>gzaoeB-1 (XQZeB-1) and<br />
Xieq<strong>in</strong>gzaoeB-2 (XQZeB-2). Genetic analysis revealed that<br />
the elongated uppermost <strong>in</strong>ternode <strong>in</strong> the two mutants was<br />
governed by one pair of recessive genes. The recessive gene<br />
of XQZeB-1 is allelic to the reported eui, but that of XQZeB-<br />
2 is nonallelic. Therefore, the elongated-uppermost-<strong>in</strong>ternode<br />
gene of XQZeB-2 is a new one, designated as eui2(t) (Yang et<br />
al 1999). In this paper, the results of tagg<strong>in</strong>g and mapp<strong>in</strong>g of<br />
the eui2(t) gene are reported.<br />
Materials and methods<br />
XQZeB-2, a mutant possess<strong>in</strong>g elongated uppermost <strong>in</strong>ternode,<br />
and Aijiaonante (AJNT), a semidwarf cultivar, were used.<br />
An F 3 population was developed by plant<strong>in</strong>g 400 F 2 <strong>in</strong>dividuals<br />
from the cross XQZeB-2 (with eui gene) × AJNT (without<br />
eui gene) to identify molecular markers l<strong>in</strong>ked with the eui2<br />
gene. One <strong>in</strong>dividual was randomly selected from each F 3 l<strong>in</strong>e,<br />
which showed no segregation for culm length trait. One hundred<br />
eighty homozygote (Eui/Eui or eui/eui) <strong>in</strong>dividuals were<br />
obta<strong>in</strong>ed. Among them, 10 homozygous <strong>in</strong>dividuals with eui/<br />
eui were selected at random and pooled as a long-culm-length<br />
bulk (B L ), while another 10 homozygous <strong>in</strong>dividuals with Eui/<br />
Eui were selected at random and pooled as a semidwarf bulk<br />
(B S ).<br />
AFLP analysis was performed us<strong>in</strong>g the amplified fragment<br />
length polymorphism (AFLP) Analysis System I kit<br />
(GibcoBRL, Life Technologies) with 33 P-labeled nucleotides<br />
accord<strong>in</strong>g to the supplier’s <strong>in</strong>structions and as described by<br />
Vos et al (1995). One hundred twenty-eight primer comb<strong>in</strong>ations<br />
<strong>in</strong> the AFLP Analysis System I were used to <strong>in</strong>vestigate<br />
four DNA samples obta<strong>in</strong>ed from the parental l<strong>in</strong>es XQZeB-<br />
2(P T ) and AJNT (P S ), long-culm-length bulk (B L ), and semidwarf<br />
bulk (B S ). AFLP bands present or absent <strong>in</strong> P T and B T ,<br />
but correspond<strong>in</strong>gly absent or present <strong>in</strong> P S and <strong>in</strong> B S , were<br />
putatively l<strong>in</strong>ked to the eui2(t) gene.<br />
The AFLP fragments were recovered and amplified. The<br />
polymorphic amplification products were then resolved by agarose<br />
gel electrophoresis and purified with a GeneClean kit.<br />
The purified products were then cloned with pGEM R -T Easy<br />
Vector Systems (Promega).<br />
Microsatellite primers were synthesized accord<strong>in</strong>g to the<br />
reported data (http://genome.cornell.edu/rice/microsatmaps/<br />
chr10.tx). PCR amplification was performed <strong>in</strong> 10 mM Tris-<br />
HCl (pH 8.3), 50 mM KCl, 2.5 mM MgCl 2 , 10 or 15 ng primer,<br />
0.8 µCi [α- 32 P]dCTP, 100 mM dNTP, and 1.5 U Taq DNA<br />
polymerase, with 30 ng of genomic DNA per 20 µL. Thirtyfive<br />
PCR cycles were performed, with 1 m<strong>in</strong> of denaturation<br />
at 94 o C, 1.5 m<strong>in</strong> of anneal<strong>in</strong>g at 58 o C, and 2 m<strong>in</strong> of polymerization<br />
at 72 o C. Polymorphisms <strong>in</strong> the PCR products were<br />
detected by X-film after electrophoresis on 6% denatur<strong>in</strong>g<br />
polyacrylamide gel (PAGE).<br />
The AFLP marker EM521 was mapped us<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
doubled-haploid mapp<strong>in</strong>g population from ZYQ/JX and the<br />
correspond<strong>in</strong>g molecular l<strong>in</strong>kage maps us<strong>in</strong>g the Mapmaker<br />
software.<br />
Molecular markers, QTL mapp<strong>in</strong>g, and marker-assisted selection 317
Distance<br />
from RM222<br />
(cM)<br />
Chr. 10<br />
Locus<br />
Distance (cM)<br />
Chr. 10<br />
Marker<br />
0<br />
4.3<br />
7.1<br />
15.5<br />
16.7<br />
23.1<br />
50.0<br />
51.2<br />
52.1<br />
58.3<br />
61.1<br />
62.3<br />
65.6<br />
68.0<br />
78.4<br />
83.9<br />
89.7<br />
93.0<br />
96.8<br />
107.6<br />
RM222<br />
RM244<br />
RM216<br />
RM239<br />
RM311<br />
G1084<br />
RG257<br />
RM184<br />
RZ625<br />
RG241<br />
RM271<br />
CDO93<br />
RM269<br />
RM258<br />
RM304<br />
RM171<br />
G2155<br />
RM294A<br />
RG134<br />
RZ500<br />
RM147<br />
RM333<br />
RM271<br />
RM269<br />
RM258<br />
RM304<br />
eui(t)<br />
22.20<br />
0.90<br />
10.60<br />
1.40<br />
0.00<br />
EM521<br />
2.1<br />
1.9<br />
14.2<br />
15.6<br />
8.3<br />
4.7<br />
13.1<br />
11.5<br />
16.6<br />
7.8<br />
G333<br />
G1125<br />
G1084<br />
G1082<br />
GA223<br />
G291<br />
EM521<br />
G2155<br />
C16<br />
CT221<br />
C223<br />
Fig. 1. L<strong>in</strong>kage map of rice<br />
chromosome 10 show<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
location of eui2(t).<br />
Results<br />
Us<strong>in</strong>g AFLP analysis and bulked segregant pools from the F 3<br />
progenies of the cross of XQZeB-2 and AJNT, approximately<br />
8,960 AFLP loci were screened with 128 primer comb<strong>in</strong>ations.<br />
Four AFLP products generated by two pairs of primer comb<strong>in</strong>ations<br />
(E-TC/M-CTT and E-ACA/M-CAG) were identified<br />
as EM436, EM444, EM521, and EM527. Among them,<br />
EM521 and EM436 were found to be a s<strong>in</strong>gle-copy sequence,<br />
but only the marker EM521 showed polymorphism <strong>in</strong> RFLP<br />
analysis. EM521 was subsequently mapped on chromosome<br />
10 us<strong>in</strong>g a doubled-haploid mapp<strong>in</strong>g population. Cosegregation<br />
analysis showed that marker EM521was tightly l<strong>in</strong>ked to the<br />
eui2(t) gene. There is only one recomb<strong>in</strong>ant <strong>in</strong> 100 homozygous<br />
<strong>in</strong>dividuals with eui/eui or Eui/Eui.<br />
One hundred eighty-six simple sequence repeat (SSR)<br />
markers were screened. Four SSR markers—RM258, RM269,<br />
RM271, and RM304, which were l<strong>in</strong>ked to eui2(t) and located<br />
on chromosome 10—were identified. The genetic distances<br />
analyzed with Mapmaker software from the four markers to<br />
eui2(t) were 12.0, 12.9, 35.1, and 1.4 cM, respectively.<br />
The l<strong>in</strong>kage of eui2(t) with SSR markers and the AFLP<br />
marker was analyzed with Mapmaker. Figure 1 shows the results.<br />
It can be concluded that the eui2(t) gene is located <strong>in</strong> the<br />
middle of the long arm of chromosome 10.<br />
Discussion<br />
AFLP and SSR are powerful markers for tagg<strong>in</strong>g and mapp<strong>in</strong>g<br />
a new gene. Us<strong>in</strong>g these techniques, one AFLP marker and<br />
four SSR markers were identified. These markers solidly<br />
showed that the eui2(t) gene is located <strong>in</strong> the middle of the<br />
long arm of chromosome 10. Among them, the AFLP marker<br />
EM521 will be very useful <strong>in</strong> physical mapp<strong>in</strong>g because it is<br />
closely l<strong>in</strong>ked with eui2(t).<br />
So far, only one eui gene controll<strong>in</strong>g the trait elongated<br />
uppermost <strong>in</strong>ternode has been reported; the eui2(t) gene is a<br />
new one. Compared with the l<strong>in</strong>es possess<strong>in</strong>g the eui1 gene,<br />
l<strong>in</strong>es possess<strong>in</strong>g the eui2(t) gene were shorter but had an uppermost<br />
<strong>in</strong>ternode with almost the same length. For example,<br />
the proportion of the uppermost <strong>in</strong>ternode length to the entire<br />
culm length of XQZeB-2 and XQZeB-1 was 65.3% and 54.8%,<br />
respectively. Compared to the orig<strong>in</strong>al XQZB, the <strong>in</strong>creased<br />
length of the uppermost <strong>in</strong>ternode of XQZeB-2 contributed<br />
90.2% to the total <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> culm length and 53.3% <strong>in</strong><br />
XQZeB-1 (Yang et al 1999). This suggested that the identification<br />
of the eui2(t) gene makes it possible to develop hybrid<br />
rice with sterile (A) and restorer l<strong>in</strong>es (R) possess<strong>in</strong>g different<br />
eui genes simultaneously, which would result <strong>in</strong> no or less application<br />
of GA 3 for both parental l<strong>in</strong>es.<br />
References<br />
Librojo AL, Khush GS. 1986. Chromosomal location of some mutant<br />
genes through the use of primary trisomics <strong>in</strong> rice. In:<br />
<strong>Rice</strong> genetics. Manila (Philipp<strong>in</strong>es): <strong>International</strong> <strong>Rice</strong> Research<br />
Instititue. p 249-255.<br />
Rutger JN, Carnahan HL. 1981. A fourth genetic element to facilitate<br />
hybrid cereal production—a recessive tall <strong>in</strong> rice. Crop<br />
Sci. 21:373-376.<br />
Shen Zongtan, Yang Changdeng, He Zuhua. 1987. Studies on elim<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g<br />
panicle enclosure <strong>in</strong> a WA-type MS l<strong>in</strong>e of rice (Oryza<br />
sativa subsp. <strong>in</strong>dica). Ch<strong>in</strong>. J. <strong>Rice</strong> Sci. 1(2):95-99. (In Ch<strong>in</strong>ese.)<br />
Virmani SS, Dalmacio RD, Lopez MT. 1988. eui gene for elongated<br />
uppermost <strong>in</strong>ternode transferred to <strong>in</strong>dica rice. Int. <strong>Rice</strong> Res.<br />
Notes 13(6):6.<br />
318 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
Vos P, Hogers R, Bleeker M, Reijans M, van de Lee T, Hornes M,<br />
Fritjers A, Pot J, Peleman J, Kulper M, Zabeau M. 1995.<br />
AFLP: a new technique for DNA f<strong>in</strong>gerpr<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g. Nucl. Acids<br />
Res. 3:4407-4414.<br />
Wu Yuliang, He Zuhua, Dong Jix<strong>in</strong>, Li Debao, L<strong>in</strong> Hongxuan,<br />
Zhuang Jieyun, Lu Jun, Zheng Kangle. 1998. The RFLP of<br />
tagg<strong>in</strong>g of eui gene <strong>in</strong> rice. Ch<strong>in</strong>. J. <strong>Rice</strong> Sci. 12(2):119-120.<br />
(In Ch<strong>in</strong>ese.)<br />
Yang RC, Yang SL, Huang RH, Zang QP. 1999. A new gene for<br />
elongated uppermost <strong>in</strong>ternode. <strong>Rice</strong> Genet. Newsl. 16:41-<br />
43.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ addresses: S.L. Yang, R.C. Yang, H.L. Ma, Q.Q. Zhang,<br />
S.B. Zhang, Institute of <strong>Genetics</strong> and Crop Breed<strong>in</strong>g, Fujian<br />
Agricultural University, Fuzhou 350002; X.P. Qu, Institute<br />
of <strong>Genetics</strong>, Ch<strong>in</strong>ese Academy of Science, Beij<strong>in</strong>g 100101,<br />
Ch<strong>in</strong>a.<br />
Acknowledgments: The authors gratefully thank Prof. B<strong>in</strong> Wang of<br />
the Institute of <strong>Genetics</strong>, Ch<strong>in</strong>ese Academy of Science, Beij<strong>in</strong>g,<br />
for technical advice and for provid<strong>in</strong>g the facilities for this<br />
study, and Prof. Lihuang Zhu, also of the Institute of <strong>Genetics</strong>,<br />
for k<strong>in</strong>dly provid<strong>in</strong>g the doubled-haploid mapp<strong>in</strong>g population<br />
and its correspond<strong>in</strong>g molecular l<strong>in</strong>kage maps. This<br />
program is supported by the Fujian Prov<strong>in</strong>cial Natural Foundation.<br />
Map-based clon<strong>in</strong>g of Ps1, a gene for pollen abortion <strong>in</strong> rice<br />
S.Y. L<strong>in</strong>, T. Takashi, T. Sasaki, and M. Yano<br />
Abortions of male and female gametes are frequently observed <strong>in</strong> F 2<br />
and advanced progenies from distant crosses of rice. We<br />
detected a gene, Ps1, for pollen abortion <strong>in</strong> BC 4<br />
F 4<br />
backcross progenies derived from a cross between japonica variety Nipponbare<br />
and <strong>in</strong>dica variety Kasalath. The Ps1 gene was mapped onto chromosome 1 by a l<strong>in</strong>kage analysis with RFLP markers. Further<br />
progeny analysis us<strong>in</strong>g RFLP markers revealed that male gametes carry<strong>in</strong>g the Nipponbare allele at the Ps1 locus were aborted<br />
<strong>in</strong> plants heterozygous at the Ps1 locus. To isolate the Ps1 gene, we constructed a high-resolution genetic l<strong>in</strong>kage map of the<br />
Ps1 region; the Ps1 gene was mapped <strong>in</strong>to the <strong>in</strong>terval between RFLP markers G270 and E60083. Four P1-derived artificial<br />
chromosome (PAC) clones were selected from the genomic library of Nipponbare by two sequence-tagged sites of G270 and<br />
E60083. By genetic mapp<strong>in</strong>g of subclones derived from a PAC clone conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the Ps1 locus, a 20-kb region was def<strong>in</strong>ed as<br />
a candidate genomic region for Ps1.<br />
Abortions of male and female gametes are frequently observed<br />
<strong>in</strong> F 2 and advanced progenies from distant crosses of rice. Such<br />
gamete abortion causes seed sterility and has been the subject<br />
of extensive genetic analysis; many genes <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> sterility<br />
have been reported (reviewed by Ikehashi and Wan 1996,<br />
K<strong>in</strong>oshita 1998). However, the molecular basis of this sterility<br />
is still uncerta<strong>in</strong> because no gene has been identified at the<br />
molecular level. While develop<strong>in</strong>g chromosomal segmental<br />
substitution l<strong>in</strong>es, we found a remarkable segregation distortion<br />
<strong>in</strong> advanced backcross progenies derived from a cross<br />
between japonica variety Nipponbare and <strong>in</strong>dica variety<br />
Kasalath. In this study, we proved that the segregation distortion<br />
was caused by pollen abortion and that the gene <strong>in</strong>volved<br />
was located on chromosome 1. Moreover, to identify the gene<br />
for pollen abortion at the molecular level, we performed a highresolution,<br />
f<strong>in</strong>e-scale l<strong>in</strong>kage mapp<strong>in</strong>g of the gene. We also<br />
developed a P1-derived artificial chromosome (PAC) clone<br />
contig for the target region.<br />
Small-scale mapp<strong>in</strong>g and characterization of Ps1<br />
We used 192 BC 4 F 4 plants of Nipponbare (as the recurrent<br />
parent) and Kasalath for a small-scale mapp<strong>in</strong>g of the gene for<br />
pollen abortion. Plants with partially sterile (Fig. 1A) and completely<br />
fertile pollen (Fig. 1B) were segregated <strong>in</strong> this population.<br />
The segregation of the two classes was 102:90<br />
(sterile:fertile). On the assumption that plants heterozygous at<br />
the causal locus exhibited partial pollen sterility and those<br />
homozygous at the causal locus exhibited complete fertility,<br />
we successfully mapped the target locus between RFLP markers<br />
R1928 and S13994 on chromosome 1 (Fig. 2A) and tentatively<br />
designated it as Ps1. A remarkable segregation distortion<br />
with only a few plants of the Nipponbare type was observed<br />
<strong>in</strong> this population. These results suggested that the segregation<br />
distortion occurred by pollen abortion and that pollen<br />
with the Nipponbare allele at Ps1 might be selectively<br />
aborted. To confirm the selective abortion of pollen with the<br />
Nipponbare allele at Ps1, we surveyed the segregation distortion<br />
<strong>in</strong> two BC 1 populations (Table 1). Remarkable segregation<br />
distortion occurred <strong>in</strong> the BC 1 population derived from a<br />
cross between Nipponbare and a plant heterozygous at Ps1 (as<br />
a male parent), as well as <strong>in</strong> self-poll<strong>in</strong>ated progenies of a plant<br />
heterozygous at Ps1 (Table 1). On the other hand, no distortion<br />
occurred <strong>in</strong> the BC 1 population from a cross between a<br />
plant heterozygous at Ps1 and Kasalath (as a male parent)<br />
(Table 1). These results <strong>in</strong>dicated that the segregation distortion<br />
occurred by selective abortion of pollen with the<br />
Nipponbare allele at the Ps1 locus on plants heterozygous at<br />
Molecular markers, QTL mapp<strong>in</strong>g, and marker-assisted selection 319
A<br />
B<br />
Fig. 1. Pollen abortion observed<br />
<strong>in</strong> BC 4 F 4 plants derived from a<br />
cross between Nipponbare and<br />
Kasalath. (A) About half the pollen<br />
was aborted, (B) all pollen<br />
normal.<br />
A<br />
No. of<br />
B C<br />
cM<br />
recomb<strong>in</strong>ants<br />
No. of<br />
recomb<strong>in</strong>ants<br />
0.3<br />
0.5<br />
0.5<br />
0.3<br />
0.3<br />
1.3<br />
0.3<br />
0.3<br />
2.1<br />
S13849<br />
S765<br />
V139<br />
R1928<br />
Ps1<br />
S13994<br />
S1945<br />
R1467<br />
R3072<br />
9<br />
6<br />
4<br />
R1928<br />
G270<br />
Ps1<br />
E60083<br />
S13994<br />
S1945<br />
P0417G11<br />
P0672C09<br />
P0693H09<br />
P0013G02<br />
G270<br />
E60083<br />
5<br />
1<br />
3<br />
1<br />
G270<br />
Sub-24<br />
Ps1<br />
Sub-4<br />
Sub-9<br />
E60083<br />
R2635<br />
Fig. 2. F<strong>in</strong>e-scale, high-resolution l<strong>in</strong>kage maps of the Ps1 region on chromosome<br />
1. (A) L<strong>in</strong>kage map developed by analyz<strong>in</strong>g 192 plants, (B) l<strong>in</strong>kage map developed<br />
by analyz<strong>in</strong>g 2,500 plants, (C) PAC clone conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the Ps1 locus and a f<strong>in</strong>e-scale,<br />
high-resolution l<strong>in</strong>kage map us<strong>in</strong>g newly developed RFLP markers derived from the<br />
selected PAC clone.<br />
Table 1. Segregation distortion of marker S13994 tightly l<strong>in</strong>ked to<br />
Ps1 <strong>in</strong> different populations.<br />
Population<br />
Plants (no.) a<br />
NN NK KK<br />
P value<br />
Selfed population 12 102 78
with RFLP markers revealed that Ps1 was mapped between<br />
RFLP markers G270 and E60083, which were developed by<br />
EST mapp<strong>in</strong>g (Wu et al 1999) (Fig. 2B). We then used the<br />
sequence-tagged sites of G270 and E60083 to select PAC<br />
clones from the genomic library of Nipponbare developed <strong>in</strong><br />
the <strong>Rice</strong> Genome Research Program (RGP) <strong>in</strong> Japan (Baba et<br />
al 2000). As a result, four PAC clones were selected and one<br />
PAC clone (P0013G02) was found to conta<strong>in</strong> the Ps1 locus.<br />
An <strong>in</strong>sert of P0013G02 was subcloned and some resultant<br />
subclones were mapped as RFLP markers. F<strong>in</strong>ally, the Ps1<br />
gene was mapped between Sub-9 and Sub-24, and cosegregated<br />
with Sub-4 (Fig. 2C). Us<strong>in</strong>g Southern hybridization analysis,<br />
we def<strong>in</strong>ed a genomic region of
A B<br />
M 1 2 3 4 M 5 6 7 8 9 M<br />
M 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 2021 22 M<br />
Fig. 2. Segregation of the RG140L-L locus determ<strong>in</strong>ed by S-SAP analysis.<br />
PCR products of the segregat<strong>in</strong>g population were produced by DNA amplification<br />
with primer RG140L-L. IR46/IR62829 and the genotypes of each F 2<br />
<strong>in</strong>dividual were given the designation Rf3, rf3, and Rf3rf3 based on the<br />
band<strong>in</strong>g pattern of the RG140L-L locus. Lane 1: IR62829A, lane 2: IR46,<br />
lanes 3–22: F 2 .<br />
Taq polymerase <strong>in</strong> a volume of 25 µL). Template DNA was<br />
<strong>in</strong>itially denatured at 94 o C for 5 m<strong>in</strong>, followed by 30 cycles of<br />
PCR amplification under the follow<strong>in</strong>g parameters: 1-m<strong>in</strong> denaturation<br />
at 94 o C, 1-m<strong>in</strong> primer anneal<strong>in</strong>g at 55 o C, and 2-<br />
m<strong>in</strong> primer extension at 72 o C. A f<strong>in</strong>al 5-m<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>cubation at 72<br />
o C was allowed for completion of primer extension on a 480-<br />
thermal cycler. The amplified products were electrophoretically<br />
resolved on 1.2% agarose and us<strong>in</strong>g 1X TAE buffer.<br />
When comb<strong>in</strong>ations of primers RG140FL/RL and<br />
RG140FL/RB were used to amplify the DNA of the parents<br />
IR58025A and IR46, the result<strong>in</strong>g PCR products were monomorphic.<br />
Therefore, restriction enzymes were used to produce<br />
SAP fragments us<strong>in</strong>g a method described by Williams et al<br />
(1991). The amount and quality of PCR amplification were<br />
first monitored by runn<strong>in</strong>g 10-µL aliquots of the reaction mixture<br />
on agarose gel. The enzyme mix was composed of 3.2 µL<br />
sterile distilled water, 1.5 µL restriction buffer (10X), and 0.3<br />
µL restriction enzyme (10U µL –1 ). After a brief sp<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> a<br />
microfuge and stand<strong>in</strong>g overnight or after 4 h of <strong>in</strong>cubation at<br />
37 o C, the digested products were run on 1.5% agarose to resolve<br />
digested PCR fragments.<br />
Results<br />
Fig. 1. Agarose gel electrophoresis of PCR products<br />
amplified with DNA from varieties with primer<br />
RG140L-L. (A): RG140L-L digested with EcoRI: lane<br />
1: IR46, lane 2: IR62829A, lane 3: IR58025A, lane<br />
4: IR68897A. (B): RG140L-L digested with PvuII: lane<br />
5: IR46, lane 6: IR62829A, lane 7: IR24, Lane 8:<br />
IR58025A, lane 9: ZSA.<br />
The nucleotide sequence of RG140 was determ<strong>in</strong>ed on the basis<br />
of orientation to ensure accuracy. The G + C content of the<br />
clone was determ<strong>in</strong>ed to be 50–60%.<br />
We are perform<strong>in</strong>g sequence-tagged site (STS) analysis<br />
on the cross IR628295A/IR46R. It is clear from Figure 1 that<br />
PCR can detect polymorphism at certa<strong>in</strong> loci. This polymorphism<br />
can be used as markers to dist<strong>in</strong>guish between Rf3 and<br />
CMS because all loci were scored as codom<strong>in</strong>ant.<br />
In the case of RG532L-L, when comb<strong>in</strong>ed with primer<br />
RG532FL/RL, no polymorphism between IR46 and<br />
IR628295A was observed. The PCR products were digested<br />
with AluI and RsaI. RsaI fragments, which are identical <strong>in</strong><br />
IR628295A and IR46R, have to be scored as dom<strong>in</strong>ant or recessive<br />
because of the absence of a band <strong>in</strong> one of the parents.<br />
For example, three restriction sites for RsaI are present <strong>in</strong> the<br />
PCR products of IR46R (350 and 250 bp) and IR628295A<br />
(800, 350, and 250 bp).<br />
Germplasm survey of polymorphism<br />
When genomic DNA of various genotypes (IR24R, IR40750-<br />
82-2-2-3R, ZSA, IR58025A, and IR68897A) was PCR-amplified<br />
us<strong>in</strong>g the above primer comb<strong>in</strong>ations, no polymorphism<br />
was noted. However, when the PCR products were digested<br />
by EcoR1 and PvuII enzymes with the primer RG140FL/RL,<br />
we noticed that IR24R and IR40750-82-2-2-3R had the same<br />
band as IR46R and IR58025A, and IR68897A and ZSA had<br />
the same band as IR628295A. Therefore, a PCR-based RFLP<br />
l<strong>in</strong>ked to Rf-3 is produced between restorer and sterile l<strong>in</strong>es.<br />
In the case of RG532, when the genomic DNA of IR46R,<br />
IR40750-82-2-2-3R, IR58025A, ZSA, and IR68897A was used<br />
as a template, polymorphic bands among varieties were noted,<br />
mak<strong>in</strong>g it possible to compare the segregation pattern of the<br />
S-SAP sequence-specific amplification polymorphism marker<br />
with that of the RFLP marker.<br />
Analysis of the F 2<br />
population<br />
DNA from the F 2 population, one of the crosses between<br />
IR628295A and IR46, was assessed through PCR amplification<br />
us<strong>in</strong>g the primer RG140FL/RL. The resultant PCR products<br />
were spliced out by enzyme digestion with EcoRI. Fragments<br />
were resolved on agarose gels and the band<strong>in</strong>g patterns<br />
were scored with reference to those of the parents. The band<strong>in</strong>g<br />
pattern of the F 2 <strong>in</strong>dividuals could be classified <strong>in</strong>to homozygote<br />
for the IR46R-type marker 900-bp and 500-bp fragments,<br />
homozygote for IR628295A-type marker 1,400-bp fragment,<br />
and heterozygotes (display<strong>in</strong>g both fragments IR46R and<br />
IR628295A) (Fig. 2). Southern blots of the F 2 population were<br />
322 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
Table 1. Rf3 analysis of F 2 through progeny test<strong>in</strong>g and PCR from<br />
IR2829A/IR46.<br />
Progeny test<br />
PCR analysis<br />
Genotypes Plants rf3 rf3 Rf3rf3 Rf3 Rf3<br />
(no.)<br />
Accuracy (%)<br />
rf3 rf3 20 20 0 0 100.0<br />
Rf3 rf3 79 3 74 2 93.6<br />
Rf3 Rf3 21 0 2 19 90.4<br />
Table 2. Prediction of genotypes of F 2 plants based on flank<strong>in</strong>g<br />
RFLP markers (RG140FL/RL and RG532 FL/RL) for the Rf3 locus.<br />
Prediction a Progeny test<strong>in</strong>g Accuracy<br />
(%)<br />
RG532 RG140 rf3 Rf3<br />
rf3 (20) rf3 (20) 20 0 100<br />
Rf3 (21) Rf3 (21) 0 19 100<br />
a No. of plants <strong>in</strong> parentheses.<br />
probed with RG140. The segregation pattern of the RFLP<br />
markers was the same as that of the S-SAP marker, <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g<br />
that the same locus was detected by both procedures (Fig. 2).<br />
The chi-square test for goodness-of-fit suggested a close<br />
agreement of the SAP and RFLP marker segregation with that<br />
of the expected Mendelian 1:2:1 ratio.<br />
Selection based on a s<strong>in</strong>gle marker<br />
Closely l<strong>in</strong>ked DNA markers have been identified for Rf-3. A<br />
s<strong>in</strong>gle marker to identify Rf-3 <strong>in</strong> a segregat<strong>in</strong>g population <strong>in</strong><br />
120 F 2 <strong>in</strong>dividuals was based on a closely l<strong>in</strong>ked marker,<br />
RG140 FL/RL from IR628295A/IR46R. The results of two<br />
approaches are compared <strong>in</strong> Table 1. Twenty <strong>in</strong>dividual plants<br />
were homozygous for rf3 rf3 based on the S-SAP and RFLP<br />
markers, and were also found to be homozygous upon progeny<br />
test<strong>in</strong>g. This gives an accuracy of 100%. Of 79 plants that<br />
were scored as heterozygous Rf3 rf3 based on progeny test<strong>in</strong>g,<br />
74 were found to be heterozygous based on SAP and RFLP<br />
markers. Three plants were found to be homozygous rf3 and<br />
two plants were found to be homozygous Rf3 Rf3. This gives<br />
an accuracy of 93.6%. Twenty-one plants were found to be<br />
homozygous Rf3 Rf3. When identify<strong>in</strong>g homozygous restorer<br />
genotypes, 100% was obta<strong>in</strong>ed. This gives an accuracy of<br />
90.4%.<br />
Selection based on flank<strong>in</strong>g markers<br />
S<strong>in</strong>gle-marker-based selection can be corrected if flank<strong>in</strong>g<br />
markers are used for marker-aided selection. We used both<br />
flank<strong>in</strong>g markers, RG140FI/RL and RG532FI/RL. Selection<br />
accuracy was 100% <strong>in</strong> identify<strong>in</strong>g plants with homozygous sterility<br />
from a segregation of the F 2 population from IR628295A/<br />
IR46R (Table 2).<br />
Discussion<br />
Two RFLP markers, RG532 and RG140, were mapped on chromosome<br />
1 and found to be closely l<strong>in</strong>ked to Rf3. PCR-based<br />
markers can detect polymorphism at certa<strong>in</strong> loci, especially<br />
when DNA from distantly related plants is amplified. In some<br />
l<strong>in</strong>es (ZSA, IR24, and IR46), none of the amplified loci directly<br />
showed size polymorphism. We have consequently digested<br />
the amplification products with four nucleotides recogniz<strong>in</strong>g<br />
restriction endonuclease (six cutters). PCR products<br />
were then digested with six-base recogniz<strong>in</strong>g restriction endonucleases<br />
to detect DNA variation not detectable as amplified<br />
fragment length polymorphism.<br />
We tested this with the restorer gene Rf3, which has been<br />
previously mapped with RFLP marker RG532 (Zhang et al<br />
1996). We found a flank<strong>in</strong>g marker, RG140, and used both<br />
flank<strong>in</strong>g markers, RG140 and RG532, to perform marker-aided<br />
selection. Selection accuracy was 100% <strong>in</strong> identify<strong>in</strong>g homozygous<br />
sterile and fertile plants from a segregat<strong>in</strong>g F 2 population.<br />
These results demonstrate the usefulness of marker-aided<br />
selection to precisely identify the genotype of a l<strong>in</strong>ked target<br />
gene <strong>in</strong> a segregat<strong>in</strong>g population.<br />
References<br />
Nguyen Thi Lang, Subudhi PK, Virmani SS, Huang N, Brar DS.<br />
1997. Development of PCR-based markers for thermosensitive<br />
genetic male sterility gene, tms3(t), <strong>in</strong> rice. <strong>Rice</strong> Genet. Newsl.<br />
14:102-103.<br />
Subudhi PK, Borkakati RP, Virmani SS, Huang N. 1997. Molecular<br />
mapp<strong>in</strong>g of a thermosensitive genetic male sterility gene <strong>in</strong><br />
rice us<strong>in</strong>g bulked segregant analysis. Genome 40:188-194.<br />
Williams MNV, Pande N, Nair S, Mohan M, Bennett J. 1991. Restriction<br />
fragment length polymorphism analysis of polymerase<br />
cha<strong>in</strong> reaction products amplified from mapped loci of rice<br />
(Oryza sativa L.) genomic DNA. Theor. Appl. Genet. 82:489-<br />
498.<br />
Zhang G, Angeles ER, Abenes ML, Khush GS, Huang N. 1996.<br />
RAPD and RFLP mapp<strong>in</strong>g for the bacterial blight resistance<br />
gene xa-13 <strong>in</strong> rice. Theor. Appl. Genet. 93:65-70.<br />
Zheng KL, Huang N, Bennett J, Khush GS. 1995. PCR-based markerassisted<br />
selection <strong>in</strong> rice breed<strong>in</strong>g. <strong>IRRI</strong> Discussion Paper<br />
Series 12. Manila (Philipp<strong>in</strong>es): <strong>International</strong> <strong>Rice</strong> Research<br />
Institute.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ addresses: Nguyen Thi Lang and B.C. Buu, Cuu Long Delta<br />
<strong>Rice</strong> Research Institute, Vietnam; S.S. Virmani, N. Huang,<br />
D.S. Brar, and Z. Li, <strong>International</strong> <strong>Rice</strong> Research Institute,<br />
DAPO Box 7777, Metro Manila, Philipp<strong>in</strong>es.<br />
Acknowledgments: Thanks are due the Rockefeller Foundation for<br />
giv<strong>in</strong>g the first author a postdoctoral fellowship, Drs. Gurdev<br />
S. Khush and John C. O’Toole for their k<strong>in</strong>d encouragement<br />
and advice, and staff of the genetic marker laboratory of <strong>IRRI</strong><br />
for their assistance.<br />
Molecular markers, QTL mapp<strong>in</strong>g, and marker-assisted selection 323
<strong>Genetics</strong> and mapp<strong>in</strong>g of the nuclear fertility restorer gene<br />
for Honglian-type cytoplasmic male sterility <strong>in</strong> rice<br />
Y<strong>in</strong>guo Zhu, Q<strong>in</strong>gyang Huang, Yuq<strong>in</strong>g He, and Runchun J<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Honglian-type CMS (HL-CMS) is a new type of CMS that is different from the BT and WA type. The <strong>in</strong>heritance and mapp<strong>in</strong>g of<br />
fertility restoration of HL-CMS were studied us<strong>in</strong>g an HL-CMS l<strong>in</strong>e, Congguang 41A. It was gametophytic <strong>in</strong> nature and controlled<br />
by the <strong>in</strong>teraction of a sterile cytoplasm with one pair of recessive nuclear genes. Comparison of the fertility restoration<br />
relationship and allelism test between Congguang 41A and Zhenshan 97A (WA) showed that their sterile nuclear genes were<br />
nonallelic. The fertility of HL-CMS was restored by a s<strong>in</strong>gle dom<strong>in</strong>ant nuclear gene. Milyang 23 possessed a strong restor<strong>in</strong>g<br />
gene while Zhenshan 97 had a gene for partial fertility restoration. Microsatellite markers were used and a restorer gene was<br />
mapped on chromosome 10, 7.8 and 3.6 cM apart from microsatellite markers RM258 and OSR33, respectively. Evidence<br />
showed that restorer genes clustered on chromosome 10 <strong>in</strong> the rice genome.<br />
Honglian-type CMS (HL-CMS) was bred by the research group<br />
of Wuhan University. It has been widely used for the hybrid<br />
rice breed<strong>in</strong>g program <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a. A series of <strong>in</strong>terspecies and<br />
<strong>in</strong>tersubspecies hybrid rice comb<strong>in</strong>ations with high quality and<br />
multiresistance has been bred us<strong>in</strong>g HL-CMS rice. HL-type<br />
hybrid rice has been planted on more than 1 million ha every<br />
year <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a. In this research, HL-type CMS l<strong>in</strong>e Congguang<br />
41A and its restorer l<strong>in</strong>es were used to study the <strong>in</strong>heritance of<br />
fertility of HL-CMS and map the HL-CMS fertility restorer<br />
gene.<br />
Materials and methods<br />
CMS l<strong>in</strong>es used were HL-type CMS l<strong>in</strong>e Congguang 41A and<br />
WA-type CMS l<strong>in</strong>e Zhenshan 97A. Restorer l<strong>in</strong>es and varieties<br />
were Congguang 41B, Zhenshan 97B, Maxie B, Yuetai,<br />
Milyang 23, IR661, 6078, Teq<strong>in</strong>g, Shengyou 2, M<strong>in</strong>ghui 63,<br />
3037, and IR72.<br />
Congguang 41A and Zhenshan 97A (control) were used<br />
as female parents and three restorer l<strong>in</strong>es and 10 varieties were<br />
used as male parents. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to testcross results, the F 1 (A<br />
× R), BC 1 (F 1 × B), and F 2 of three comb<strong>in</strong>ations from<br />
Congguang 41A and the restorer l<strong>in</strong>es Teq<strong>in</strong>g, Shenyou 2, and<br />
Milyang 2 were selected.<br />
A BC 1 population developed from the cross Congguang<br />
41A//Milyang 23/Congguang 41B was used as the mapp<strong>in</strong>g<br />
population. Congguang 41A is a male sterile l<strong>in</strong>e of HL type<br />
and Milyang 23 is the correspond<strong>in</strong>g restorer l<strong>in</strong>e. Equal<br />
amounts of DNA from 15 fertile and 15 sterile <strong>in</strong>dividuals were<br />
pooled to construct the fertile and sterile bulk, respectively.<br />
One hundred and fifty-n<strong>in</strong>e microsatellite primer pairs<br />
used <strong>in</strong> this study were k<strong>in</strong>dly provided by Dr. Zhu Lihuang.<br />
Polymerase cha<strong>in</strong> reaction (PCR) was performed. The PCR<br />
reaction was performed on a PE DNA Thermal Cycle 480.<br />
Amplification products were sized on a 3.5% agarose gel.<br />
Results<br />
Congguang 41A and Zhenshan 97A were crossed with 12 different<br />
cultivars of rice. Results <strong>in</strong>dicated that the 12 rice cultivars<br />
could be divided <strong>in</strong>to three groups (Table 1). The first<br />
group could restore the fertility of Zhenshan 97A completely<br />
or partially; however, the fertility of Congguang 41A could<br />
not be restored by them, and this group <strong>in</strong>cluded Congguang<br />
41 and Yuetai. The second group could restore the fertility of<br />
Congguang 41A completely or partially, but it could not restore<br />
that of Zhenshan 97A. This group consisted of Zhenshan<br />
97B and Maxie B. The third group could restore both<br />
Congguang 41A and Zhenshan 97A, and <strong>in</strong>cluded Teq<strong>in</strong>g,<br />
Milyang 23, Shenyou 2, M<strong>in</strong>ghui 63, 6078, IR661, 3037, and<br />
IR72. Comparison of the fertility restoration relationship between<br />
these two k<strong>in</strong>ds of CMS l<strong>in</strong>es showed that their nuclear<br />
sterile genes were nonallelic. Their fertility restoration relationships<br />
were significantly different. The pollen fertility of<br />
F 1 hybrids between Congguang 41A and its restorer l<strong>in</strong>es was<br />
about 50%, but the natural seed sett<strong>in</strong>g rate was normal. This<br />
result <strong>in</strong>dicated that the male sterility of Congguang 41A was<br />
gametophytic.<br />
The natural seed sett<strong>in</strong>g rate of BC 2 and F 2 from<br />
Congguang 41A/Teq<strong>in</strong>g and Congguang 41A/Milyang 23 was<br />
significantly different from the distribution of pollen fertility<br />
from the F 2 . The mean natural seed sett<strong>in</strong>g rate of F 2 populations<br />
from these two comb<strong>in</strong>ations was 79.2% and 77.4%, respectively,<br />
which was higher than that of the F 1 generation by<br />
1.7% and 11.5%, respectively.<br />
DNA from Congguang 41A, Milyang 23, the fertile bulk,<br />
and the sterile bulk was used as a PCR template to perform<br />
microsatellite analysis us<strong>in</strong>g 159 microsatellite primer pairs.<br />
Thirty-six primer pairs generated polymorphic bands between<br />
parents. The primers RM258 and OSR33 located on chromosome<br />
10 previously demonstrated polymorphic amplifications<br />
between the sterile and fertile bulks. This result <strong>in</strong>dicated that<br />
the nuclear fertility restorer gene for HL-type CMS was on<br />
chromosome 10. L<strong>in</strong>kage analysis with Mapmaker 3.0 revealed<br />
324 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
Table 1. Comparison of fertility restoration (%) between Congguang 41A and<br />
Zhenshan 97A.<br />
Male parent<br />
Self-cross Congguang 41A Zhenshan 97A<br />
PFR a NSSR b PFR NSSR PFR NSSR<br />
Congguang 41B 80.4 79.3 0 1.5 63.2 67.1<br />
Yuetai 68.0 88.2 0.5 5.9 81.6 59.0<br />
Zhenshan 97B 69.6 83.2 27.2 36.3 0 2.5<br />
Maxie B 83.0 86.6 49.5 59.1 0 6.5<br />
Milyang 23 83.0 89.0 49.3 65.9 84.8 –<br />
Teq<strong>in</strong>g 81.1 85.2 49.3 77.7 88.5 61.6<br />
Shenyou 2 75.2 89.7 51.1 92.2 83.9 80.7<br />
IR661 78.5 84.5 51.1 76.3 89.2 76.1<br />
6078 80.7 61.8 50.0 81.6 82.5 60.0<br />
M<strong>in</strong>ghui 63 85.1 86.1 26.2 80.7 82.0 86.2<br />
3037 83.4 73.4 52.2 69.7 89.8 83.9<br />
IR72 81.0 85.9 54.7 82.8 79.9 52.8<br />
a PFR = pollen fertility rate. b NSSR = natural seed sett<strong>in</strong>g rate.<br />
cM<br />
3.6<br />
7.8<br />
Rf-5<br />
OSR33<br />
RM258<br />
Fig. 1. Location of the fertility<br />
restorer gene (Rf-5) for<br />
Honglian-type CMS rice.<br />
that the fertility restorer gene was l<strong>in</strong>ked to these two markers<br />
with a distance of 7.8 and 3.6 cM, respectively (Fig. 1).<br />
Comparison of the fertility restoration relationship and<br />
allelism test between HL-CMS and WA-CMS showed that their<br />
nuclear sterility genes were nonallelic. The fertility of HL-CMS<br />
was restored by a s<strong>in</strong>gle dom<strong>in</strong>ant gene. Milyang 23 possessed<br />
a strong restorer gene while Zhenshan 97 had a gene for partial<br />
fertility restoration. The fertility restorer gene for HL-CMS<br />
was mapped on chromosome 10. Akagi et al (1996) located<br />
the fertility restorer gene for BT-CMS on chromosome 10,<br />
with a distance of 3.7 cM from OSR33. Yao et al (1997) also<br />
mapped Rf-4 for WA-CMS to chromosome 10, with a distance<br />
of 3.3 cM from G4003. Comparison of the different molecular<br />
l<strong>in</strong>kage maps suggested that three restorer genes were located<br />
on an adjacent region on chromosome 10. These results suggest<br />
that, just like disease resistance genes, restorer genes may<br />
also be clustered on the chromosome.<br />
References<br />
Akagi H, Yokozeki Y, Inagaki A, Fujimura. 1996. A codom<strong>in</strong>ant<br />
DNA marker closely l<strong>in</strong>ked to the rice nuclear restorer gene,<br />
Rf-1, identified with <strong>in</strong>ter-SSR f<strong>in</strong>gerpr<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g. Genome<br />
39:1205.<br />
Yao FY, Xu CG, Yu SB, Li JX, Gao YJ, Li XH, Zhang Q. 1997.<br />
Mapp<strong>in</strong>g and genetic analysis of two fertility restorer loci <strong>in</strong><br />
the wild-abortive cytoplasmic male sterility system of rice<br />
(Oryza sativa L.). Euphytica 98:183.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ addresses: Y<strong>in</strong>guo Zhu and Runchun J<strong>in</strong>g, College of Life<br />
Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, Ch<strong>in</strong>a; Q<strong>in</strong>gyang<br />
Huang, College of Life Sciences, Central Ch<strong>in</strong>a Normal University,<br />
Wuhan 430079, Ch<strong>in</strong>a; Yuq<strong>in</strong>g He, National Key<br />
Laboratory of Crop Improvement, Huazhong Agricultural<br />
University, Wuhan 430070, Ch<strong>in</strong>a.<br />
Molecular markers, QTL mapp<strong>in</strong>g, and marker-assisted selection 325
Molecular mapp<strong>in</strong>g and identification of QTLs<br />
for some agronomic traits <strong>in</strong> rice<br />
S.J. Kwon, S.N. Ahn, J.P. Suh, Y.C. Cho, H.C. Hong, Y.G. Kim, H.G. Hwang, H.P. Moon, and H.C. Choi<br />
A molecular map of rice consist<strong>in</strong>g of 114 amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) and 38 simple sequence length<br />
polymorphism (SSLP) markers was constructed us<strong>in</strong>g an F 8<br />
recomb<strong>in</strong>ant <strong>in</strong>bred (RI) population derived from the cross between<br />
two temperate japonica parents, Suweon365 and Chucheongbyeo. A set of SSLP markers was used to construct the framework<br />
map. The AFLP markers were derived from 11 EcoRI(+2) and MseI(+3) primer comb<strong>in</strong>ations. Proportions of polymorphic<br />
bands between the parents averaged 21.8% and 13.0% for SSLP and AFLP, respectively. The map covered 756.8 cM of the 12<br />
rice chromosomes, with an average <strong>in</strong>terval size of 5.6 cM. A total of seven significant quantitative trait loci for days to head<strong>in</strong>g,<br />
panicle length, panicles plant –1 , and spikelets panicle –1 were detected on four different chromosomes.<br />
Molecular maps have been developed <strong>in</strong> rice us<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>in</strong>tersubspecific (McCouch et al 1988, Cho et al 1998) and<br />
<strong>in</strong>terspecific crosses (Causse et al 1994). In Korea, the national<br />
rice breed<strong>in</strong>g program aims to develop high-quality varieties<br />
with resistance to diseases us<strong>in</strong>g only japonica as parents.<br />
To facilitate breed<strong>in</strong>g work, molecular l<strong>in</strong>kage maps based<br />
on japonica × japonica crosses must be developed so that<br />
marker-assisted selection can be used to exploit favorable traits<br />
<strong>in</strong> japonica rice varieties. This study was carried out to develop<br />
a molecular map from crosses of two japonica cultivars.<br />
Materials and methods<br />
The 231 recomb<strong>in</strong>ant <strong>in</strong>bred l<strong>in</strong>es (RIL) (F 8 ) were developed<br />
from the cross between two japonica (Suweon365,<br />
Chucheongbyeo) cultivars at the National Crop Experiment<br />
Station <strong>in</strong> Korea. These 231 l<strong>in</strong>es were grown <strong>in</strong> the field with<br />
the parents and evaluated for traits such as days to head<strong>in</strong>g,<br />
culm length, panicle length, panicles plant –1 , spikelets<br />
panicle –1 , and gra<strong>in</strong> yield. DNA was extracted from the fresh<br />
young leaves of each RIL follow<strong>in</strong>g procedures described <strong>in</strong><br />
Causse et al (1994). Procedures for simple sequence length<br />
polymorphism (SSLP), amplified fragment length polymorphism<br />
(AFLP) analysis, and silver sta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g are as described <strong>in</strong><br />
Panaud et al (1996) and Cho et al (1998). The Mapmaker program<br />
was used to establish a molecular map at an LOD value<br />
of 3.0. Quantitative trait loci (QTL) analysis was performed<br />
us<strong>in</strong>g one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the QGENE<br />
program. An LOD score of 2.0 was used as the threshold for<br />
detect<strong>in</strong>g QTL location.<br />
Results and discussion<br />
Figure 1 shows the frequency distribution of phenotypes for<br />
each trait; all traits displayed approximately normal distribution.<br />
A total of 187 microsatellite markers were evaluated for<br />
polymorphism between the parents; 38 (21.8%) of them detected<br />
polymorphism. A s<strong>in</strong>gle restriction enzyme comb<strong>in</strong>ation<br />
(EcoRI and MseI) was used to produce the AFLP data.<br />
The AFLP markers were derived from 11 different EcoRI(+2)/<br />
MseI(+3) primer comb<strong>in</strong>ations with different overhangs (data<br />
not shown). The number of bands produced by each primer<br />
comb<strong>in</strong>ation ranged from 47 to 113, with a mean of 82.5. Of<br />
the 909 AFLP bands, 118 (13.0%) were polymorphic (Table<br />
1). The level of polymorphism was lower than that between<br />
temperate and tropical japonica (Mackill et al 1996). The six<br />
primer comb<strong>in</strong>ations hav<strong>in</strong>g MseI(+CAT) <strong>in</strong> common showed<br />
higher polymorphism; a total of 97 out of the 118 AFLP markers<br />
scored were <strong>in</strong>tegrated <strong>in</strong>to the map.<br />
All 135 SSLP and AFLP markers have been mapped<br />
and a set of 38 SSLP loci was used to construct the framework<br />
(Chen et al 1997). The <strong>in</strong>tegration of AFLPs onto the SSLP<br />
map produced an SC map with a total of 756.8 cM, and an<br />
average <strong>in</strong>terval size of 5.6 cM (data not shown). The genomic<br />
coverage of the SC map is <strong>in</strong>complete, as <strong>in</strong>dicated by the<br />
shorter total map length relative to the other maps. This map<br />
has relatively fewer markers for chromosomes 1, 2, 3, and 6<br />
and more markers for chromosomes 11 and 12. Redoña and<br />
Mackill (1996) reported similar results for chromosomes 10<br />
and 11, suggest<strong>in</strong>g that these chromosomes may be highly polymorphic<br />
with<strong>in</strong> the subgroup and may be <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> the genetic<br />
differentiation of japonica cultivars.<br />
A total of seven significant QTLs were identified: two<br />
for days to head<strong>in</strong>g, three for panicle length, and one each for<br />
panicles plant –1 and spikelets panicle –1 (Table 2). Two putative<br />
QTLs were detected for days to head<strong>in</strong>g on chromosomes<br />
6 and 7. The two QTLs expla<strong>in</strong>ed 15.9% of the total phenotypic<br />
variation. Chromosomal locations of the two QTLs agree<br />
with those reported previously (Yano et al 1997). For panicle<br />
length, three QTLs were detected, account<strong>in</strong>g for 17.8% of<br />
the total phenotypic variation. They were located near RM214<br />
and RM215 on chromosomes 7 and 9, and on chromosome 11<br />
between OSR01 and ATT59B. One significant QTL, qPPL-<br />
11, was detected for panicles plant –1 . The Suweon365 allele<br />
decreased the number of panicles plant –1 by 0.9 and accounted<br />
for 4.1% of the total phenotypic variation. One significant QTL,<br />
qSPP-11, was associated with spikelets panicle –1 on chromosome<br />
11.<br />
The QTLs detected <strong>in</strong> this study are m<strong>in</strong>imal consider<strong>in</strong>g<br />
that the map coverage is not complete. More markers are<br />
326 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
Frequency<br />
Frequency<br />
Frequency<br />
(Mean ± SD)<br />
Suweon365: 104<br />
Chuchengbyeo: 114<br />
RILs: 108 + 5<br />
60<br />
50<br />
40<br />
30<br />
20<br />
10<br />
0<br />
99 105 111 117<br />
102 108 114 120<br />
Days to head<strong>in</strong>g<br />
70<br />
60<br />
50<br />
40<br />
30<br />
20<br />
10<br />
0<br />
(Mean ± SD)<br />
Suweon365: 79.8 ± 2.1<br />
Chuchengbyeo: 89.6 ± 1.5<br />
RILs: 84 ± 8.2<br />
63 73 83 93 103<br />
68 78 88 98<br />
Culm length<br />
100<br />
80<br />
60<br />
40<br />
20<br />
0<br />
16<br />
(Mean ± SD)<br />
Suweon365: 19.9 ± 0.5<br />
Chuchengbyeo: 18.0 ± 0.7<br />
RILs: 19.6 ± 1.2<br />
18 20 22<br />
17 19 21<br />
Panicle length<br />
23<br />
70<br />
60<br />
50<br />
40<br />
30<br />
20<br />
10<br />
0<br />
9<br />
(Mean ± SD)<br />
Suweon365: 15 ± 1.4<br />
Chuchengbyeo: 17.4 ± 0.9<br />
RILs: 15 ± 2.0<br />
13<br />
11<br />
17 21<br />
15 19<br />
25<br />
23<br />
100<br />
80<br />
60<br />
40<br />
20<br />
0<br />
(Mean ± SD)<br />
Suweon365: 92.0 ± 4.8<br />
Chuchengbyeo: 88.3 ± 5.9<br />
RILs: 91.0 ± 14.5<br />
60 82 104 126<br />
71 93 115 137<br />
(Mean ± SD)<br />
Suweon365: 627 ± 18.3<br />
Chuchengbyeo: 580 ± 33.1<br />
RILs: 649 ± 98.1<br />
80<br />
70<br />
60<br />
50<br />
40<br />
30<br />
20<br />
10<br />
0<br />
400 540 680 810 950<br />
470 610 740 880<br />
Panicles plant –1 (no.)<br />
Spikelets plant –1 (no.)<br />
Gra<strong>in</strong> yield (kg 0.1 ha –1 )<br />
Fig. 1. Frequency distribution of six traits <strong>in</strong> Suweon365/Chucheongbyeo recomb<strong>in</strong>ant <strong>in</strong>bred l<strong>in</strong>es. The<br />
value on the x-axis is the mid-value of each group.<br />
Table 1. Analysis of polymorphism produced by SSLP and AFLP between<br />
the parents.<br />
Marker No. Polymorphic Level of Integrated<br />
of bands bands (no.) polymorphism (%) markers (no.)<br />
SSLP 187 38 21.8 38<br />
AFLP 909 118 13.0 97<br />
47 2 4.3 2<br />
113 17 15.0 15<br />
102 16 15.7 13<br />
92 15 16.3 14<br />
107 17 15.0 12<br />
104 15 15.9 12<br />
105 16 15.2 13<br />
61 5 8.2 4<br />
53 5 9.4 5<br />
60 5 8.3 5<br />
65 5 7.7 2<br />
be<strong>in</strong>g added to this map; evaluation of other traits of agronomic<br />
importance such as gra<strong>in</strong> quality and others is also under<br />
way. Mapp<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>formation from this study would be useful<br />
for exploit<strong>in</strong>g favorable traits <strong>in</strong> japonica rice varieties via<br />
marker-assisted selection.<br />
References<br />
Causse MA, Fulton TM, Cho YG, Ahn SN, Chunwongse J, Wu KS,<br />
Xiao JH, Yu ZH, Ronald PC, Harr<strong>in</strong>gton SE, Second G,<br />
McCouch SR, Tanksley SD. 1994. Saturated molecular map<br />
of the rice genome based on an <strong>in</strong>terspecific backcross population.<br />
<strong>Genetics</strong> 138:1251-1274.<br />
Chen X, Temnynkh S, Xu Y, Cho YG, McCouch SR. 1997. Development<br />
of a microsatellite map provid<strong>in</strong>g genome-wide coverage<br />
<strong>in</strong> rice (Oryza sativa L.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 95:553-<br />
567.<br />
Cho YG, McCouch SR, Kuiper M, Kang MR Pot J, Groenen JTM,<br />
Eun MY. 1998. Integrated map of AFLP, SSLP, and RFLP<br />
markers us<strong>in</strong>g a recomb<strong>in</strong>ant <strong>in</strong>bred population of rice (Oryza<br />
sativa L.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 97:370-380.<br />
Mackill DJ, Zhang Z, Redoña ED, Colowit PM. 1996. Level of polymorphism<br />
and genetic mapp<strong>in</strong>g of AFLP markers <strong>in</strong> rice.<br />
Genome 39:969-977.<br />
McCouch SR, Kochert G, Yu ZH, Wang ZY, Khush GS, Coffman<br />
WR, Tanksley SD. 1988. Molecular mapp<strong>in</strong>g of rice chromosomes.<br />
Theor. Appl. Genet. 76:815-829.<br />
Panaud O, Chen X, McCouch SR. 1996. Development of<br />
microsatellite markers and characterization of simple sequence<br />
length polymorphism (SSLP) <strong>in</strong> rice (Oryza sativa L.). Mol.<br />
Gen. Genet. 252:597-607.<br />
Redoña ED, Mackill DJ. 1996. Molecular mapp<strong>in</strong>g of quantitative<br />
trait loci <strong>in</strong> japonica rice. Genome 39:395-403.<br />
Molecular markers, QTL mapp<strong>in</strong>g, and marker-assisted selection 327
Table 2. Quantitative trait loci related to agronomic traits <strong>in</strong> Suweon365/Chucheongbyeo recomb<strong>in</strong>ant <strong>in</strong>bred<br />
l<strong>in</strong>es (RILs).<br />
Associated Peak % of Phenotypic effect Allele<br />
Trait QTL Chromosome marker LOD PV a effect<br />
SS CC<br />
Days to head<strong>in</strong>g qDTH-6 6 OSR19 4.78 9.6 110.3 107.3 3.0<br />
qDTH-7 7 RM476 3.65 6.3 107.3 109.7 –2.4<br />
Panicle length qPL-7 7 RM214 3.19 6.6 19.9 19.3 0.6<br />
qPL-9 9 RM215 2.75 5.3 19.4 20.0 –0.6<br />
qPL-11 11 OSR01– 2.20 5.9 19.9 19.3 0.6<br />
ATT59B<br />
Panicles plant –1 (no.) qPPP-11 11 em2215 2.04 4.1 14.6 15.5 –0.9<br />
Spikelets panicle –1 (no.) qSPP-11 11 em626 5.32 8.5 95.2 86.7 8.5<br />
a PV = phenotypic variation.<br />
Yano M, Harushima Y, Nagamura Y, Kurata Y, M<strong>in</strong>ode Y, Sasaki T.<br />
1997. Identification of quantitative trait loci head<strong>in</strong>g date <strong>in</strong><br />
rice us<strong>in</strong>g a high-density l<strong>in</strong>kage map. Theor. Appl. Genet.<br />
95:1025-1032.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ addresses: S.J. Kwon, J.P. Suh, Y.C. Cho, H.C. Hong, Y.G.<br />
Kim, H.G. Hwang, H.C. Choi, National Crop Experiment Station,<br />
RDA, Suwon 441-100; H.P. Moon, National Yeongnam<br />
Agricultural Experiment Station, RDA, Milyang 627-130; S.N.<br />
Ahn, Department of Agronomy, Chungnam National University,<br />
Taejon 305-764, Korea. E-mail: sjkwon@nces.go.kr.<br />
Mapp<strong>in</strong>g QTLs associated with tolerance for enhanced<br />
ultraviolet-B radiation <strong>in</strong> rice<br />
T. Sato, Y. Fukuta, M. Yano, and T. Kumagai<br />
An understand<strong>in</strong>g of the genetics of tolerance for enhanced ultraviolet-B (UV-B) radiation could aid <strong>in</strong> develop<strong>in</strong>g rice adaptable<br />
to areas with high UV-B radiation. Putative quantitative trait loci (QTLs) associated with tolerance for enhanced UV-B radiation<br />
<strong>in</strong> rice were identified us<strong>in</strong>g 98 backcross <strong>in</strong>bred l<strong>in</strong>es (BIL) derived from the cross of japonica cv. Nipponbare (tolerant) ×<br />
<strong>in</strong>dica cv. Kasalath (susceptible). We used 245 RFLP markers to construct a framework l<strong>in</strong>kage map. L<strong>in</strong>es were grown under<br />
visible radiation with or without supplemental UV-B radiation <strong>in</strong> a growth chamber. We measured the dry weight of biomass,<br />
plant height, and the accumulation of UV-absorb<strong>in</strong>g compounds <strong>in</strong> leaf blades. As a measure of UV-B tolerance, we compared<br />
the ratios of dry weight to those of the control under UV-B radiation. The ratio of dry weight <strong>in</strong> BILs demonstrated transgressive<br />
variation. QTL analysis was conducted us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>terval analysis (QGENE). Three putative QTLs associated with tolerance for<br />
<strong>in</strong>creased UV-B radiation were mapped on chromosomes 1, 7, and 10. A major QTL on chromosome 10 accounted for 36% of<br />
the total phenotypic variation. One QTL on chromosome 1 co<strong>in</strong>cided with the chromosomal region associated with the accumulation<br />
of UV-absorb<strong>in</strong>g compounds on the leaf blade. The Nipponbare alleles showed tolerance for enhanced UV-B radiation,<br />
except for those of one QTL on chromosome 7.<br />
The depletion of the stratospheric ozone because of man-made<br />
pollution has resulted <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>creased solar ultraviolet-B (UV-B)<br />
radiation on Earth’s surface. In particular, <strong>in</strong>formation about<br />
the effect of <strong>in</strong>creased UV radiation on growth and development<br />
of cereal crops is lack<strong>in</strong>g. In a 5-y field study, we found<br />
that enhanced UV-B radiation might have a negative effect on<br />
gra<strong>in</strong> development <strong>in</strong> the field <strong>in</strong> cool rice-cultivation regions<br />
(Kumagai et al 2001). In previous experiments, we found that<br />
various cultivars belong<strong>in</strong>g to the same ecotype showed differences<br />
<strong>in</strong> sensitivity to <strong>in</strong>creased UV-B radiation (Kumagai<br />
and Sato 1992). The sensitivity to <strong>in</strong>creased UV-B radiation<br />
<strong>in</strong> Japanese lowland rice cultivars was controlled by more than<br />
two genes (Sato et al 1994). Furthermore, the tolerance for<br />
<strong>in</strong>creased UV-B radiation partly depended on the accumulation<br />
of UV-absorb<strong>in</strong>g compounds <strong>in</strong> leaf blades (Sato and<br />
Kumagai 1997). The reasons for cultural variability <strong>in</strong> tolerance<br />
for UV-B radiation are not yet well understood. We need<br />
to understand first the genetic bases of UV tolerance and sensitivity.<br />
The objective of this study was to identify putative<br />
QTLs associated with tolerance for <strong>in</strong>creased UV-B radiation<br />
<strong>in</strong> rice.<br />
328 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
C112<br />
R117<br />
C742<br />
R2414<br />
C86<br />
C813<br />
R2417<br />
C1370<br />
C122<br />
R886<br />
C808<br />
R1485<br />
R2635<br />
R1928<br />
C178<br />
R2329<br />
R210<br />
C1211<br />
C955<br />
C885<br />
R1944<br />
R1613<br />
C970<br />
C161<br />
UV-B sensitivity <strong>in</strong>dex<br />
UV-absorb<strong>in</strong>g substance<br />
Length of 3rd leaves<br />
C261<br />
C1057<br />
R565<br />
S10012<br />
R2401<br />
R1488<br />
C39<br />
C1226<br />
R1440<br />
R3089<br />
C451<br />
R1357<br />
R1245<br />
C847<br />
C1412<br />
R1789<br />
C596<br />
C213<br />
C728<br />
LOD 0.0 LOD 0.0<br />
LOD 0.0<br />
C701<br />
R1933<br />
R2174<br />
R2194<br />
R1629<br />
R2447<br />
C1286<br />
C1369<br />
R1877<br />
C488<br />
R716<br />
C809<br />
G127<br />
C223<br />
Chr 1<br />
Chr 7<br />
Chr 10<br />
Fig. 1. Interval analysis for UV-B sensitivity, the content of UV-absorb<strong>in</strong>g compounds, and the length of the 3rd leaf. The arrowhead<br />
<strong>in</strong>dicates the position of putative QTLs, and open and darkened arrowheads show that Nipponbare (japonica) and Kasalath<br />
(<strong>in</strong>dica) alleles <strong>in</strong>crease each parameter, respectively. F<strong>in</strong>e vertical l<strong>in</strong>es represent the threshold for detection of a QTL (LOD =<br />
1.50).<br />
Materials and methods<br />
N<strong>in</strong>ety-eight BC 1 F 5 l<strong>in</strong>es developed from a backcross (BC 1 F 1 )<br />
of Nipponbare (japonica, UV-B tolerant)/Kasalath (<strong>in</strong>dica, UV-<br />
B sensitive)//Nipponbare at the National Institute of Agricultural<br />
Science and Technology were used (L<strong>in</strong> et al 1998). A<br />
l<strong>in</strong>kage map of the 245 restriction fragment length polymorphism<br />
(RFLP) markers used for QTL analysis was obta<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
from the <strong>Rice</strong> Genome Project, Japan, previously described<br />
by L<strong>in</strong> et al (1998). Germ<strong>in</strong>ated seeds of backcross <strong>in</strong>bred l<strong>in</strong>es<br />
(BILs) were planted <strong>in</strong> synthetic culture soil <strong>in</strong> seedl<strong>in</strong>g trays<br />
and transferred to a large growth chamber. These BIL plants<br />
were grown for 4 wk under visible light with or without supplemental<br />
UV-B radiation. Plants received 12 h of 130 µmol<br />
m –2 s –1 photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD). Ultraviolet-B<br />
fluorescent tubes were suspended above the rice plants<br />
and wrapped with cellulose diacetate (0.13 mm thick) films to<br />
elim<strong>in</strong>ate UV radiation with wavelengths below 290 nm. The<br />
cellulose diacetate films were replaced every 10 d to ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><br />
uniform optical properties. The plant materials of aerial parts<br />
<strong>in</strong> each BIL were oven-dried at 80 °C for 72 h and weighed.<br />
Leaf tissues were cut <strong>in</strong>to small pieces and immersed <strong>in</strong> 10 mL<br />
of 70% methanol/1% HCl (v/v) <strong>in</strong> the dark at room temperature<br />
for 4 d. The relative level of accumulation of UV-absorb<strong>in</strong>g<br />
compounds was determ<strong>in</strong>ed by measur<strong>in</strong>g the absorbance<br />
at 330 nm us<strong>in</strong>g a spectrophotometer. The QTLs associated<br />
with the percent change <strong>in</strong> dry weight and the accumulation of<br />
UV-absorb<strong>in</strong>g compounds were analyzed us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>terval analysis<br />
of computer program QGENE (Nelson 1997).<br />
Results and discussion<br />
The percent change <strong>in</strong> dry weight (DW%) of aerial parts under<br />
<strong>in</strong>creased UV-B radiation <strong>in</strong> two parents, Nipponbare and<br />
Kasalath, was 65% and 18%, respectively. The DW% of BILs<br />
ranged from 12% to 87% with cont<strong>in</strong>uous variation and demonstrated<br />
transgressive segregation. The transgressive segregation<br />
resulted from the recomb<strong>in</strong>ation of two or more genes<br />
contribut<strong>in</strong>g to UV-B tolerance <strong>in</strong> rice. Three putative QTLs<br />
on chromosomes 1, 7, and 10 were detected for DW%, together<br />
expla<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g 53.7% of the phenotypic variation (Fig. 1).<br />
The percentage of phenotypic variation that was expla<strong>in</strong>ed by<br />
QTLs on chromosomes 1 and 10 was 14% and 37%, respectively.<br />
Nipponbare alleles <strong>in</strong>creased the DW% of putative QTLs<br />
on chromosomes 1 and 10, whereas the Kasalath allele <strong>in</strong>creased<br />
the DW% of the putative QTL on chromosome 7. The<br />
putative QTL for accumulat<strong>in</strong>g UV-absorb<strong>in</strong>g compounds <strong>in</strong><br />
the leaf blade was close to the chromosome region associated<br />
with the putative DW% QTL on chromosome 1. Therefore,<br />
tolerance for <strong>in</strong>creased UV-B radiation was partially caused<br />
by the accumulation of UV-absorb<strong>in</strong>g compounds. Once this<br />
was known, we could explore the possibility of us<strong>in</strong>g conventional<br />
breed<strong>in</strong>g to m<strong>in</strong>imize the potential impact of <strong>in</strong>creased<br />
UV-B damage.<br />
Molecular markers, QTL mapp<strong>in</strong>g, and marker-assisted selection 329
References<br />
Kumagai T, Hidema J, Kang HS, Sato T. 2001. Effects of supplemental<br />
UV-B radiation on the growth and yield of two cultivars<br />
of Japanese lowland rice (Oryza sativa L.) under the field<br />
<strong>in</strong> a cool rice-grow<strong>in</strong>g region of Japan. Agric. Ecosyst.<br />
Environ. 83(1/2):201-208.<br />
Kumagai T, Sato T. 1992. Inhibitory effects of <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> near-UV<br />
radiation on the growth of Japanese rice cultivars (Oryza sativa<br />
L.) <strong>in</strong> phytotron and recovery by exposure to visible radiation.<br />
Jpn. J. Breed. 42:545-552.<br />
L<strong>in</strong> SY, Sasaki T, Yano M. 1998. Mapp<strong>in</strong>g quantitative trait loci<br />
controll<strong>in</strong>g seed dormancy and head<strong>in</strong>g date <strong>in</strong> rice, Oryza<br />
sativa L., us<strong>in</strong>g backcross <strong>in</strong>bred l<strong>in</strong>es. Theor. Appl. Genet.<br />
96:997-1003.<br />
Nelson C. 1997. QGENE: software for marker-based genomic analysis<br />
and breed<strong>in</strong>g. Mol. Breed. 3:239-245.<br />
Sato T, Kang HS, Kumagai T. 1994. Genetic study of resistance to<br />
<strong>in</strong>hibitory effects of UV radiation <strong>in</strong> rice (Oryza sativa L.).<br />
Physiol. Plant. 91:234-238.<br />
Sato T, Kumagai T. 1997. Role of UV-absorb<strong>in</strong>g compounds <strong>in</strong> genetic<br />
differences <strong>in</strong> the resistance to UV-B radiation <strong>in</strong> rice<br />
plants. Breed. Sci. 47:21-26.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ addresses: T. Sato and T. Kumagai, Institute of Genetic<br />
Ecology, Tohoku University, Aoba-ku, Sendai 980-8577, Japan;<br />
Y. Fukuta, Plant Breed<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>Genetics</strong>, and Biochemistry<br />
Division, <strong>International</strong> <strong>Rice</strong> Research Institute, DAPO Box<br />
7777, Metro Manila, Philipp<strong>in</strong>es; M. Yano, <strong>Rice</strong> Genome Research<br />
Program, National Institute of Agrobiological Resources,<br />
2-1-2 Kannondai, Tsukuba 305-8602, Japan.<br />
Genetic systems of cross-<strong>in</strong>compatibility<br />
as pre- and postfertilization barriers <strong>in</strong> rice<br />
K. Matsubara, R. Suzuki, Kh<strong>in</strong>-Tidar, K. Okuno, and Y. Sano<br />
Both pre- and postfertilization barriers have been detected after <strong>in</strong>troduc<strong>in</strong>g alien genes from wild rice <strong>in</strong>to cultivated rice,<br />
which showed unidirectional cross-<strong>in</strong>compatibility. Aborted seeds were frequently produced when the near-isogenic l<strong>in</strong>e (NIL,<br />
japonica type) carry<strong>in</strong>g the segment of chromosome 6 from Oryza rufipogon was poll<strong>in</strong>ated with the recurrent parent, whereas<br />
the reciprocal showed normal seed sett<strong>in</strong>g. The cross-<strong>in</strong>compatibility was expla<strong>in</strong>ed by three genes (C<strong>in</strong>f, Su-C<strong>in</strong>f, and c<strong>in</strong>m),<br />
all of which were located on the short arm. C<strong>in</strong>f and c<strong>in</strong>m controlled the cross-<strong>in</strong>compatibility <strong>in</strong> the female and male,<br />
respectively, and Su-C<strong>in</strong>f acted as a suppressor of C<strong>in</strong>f. All three genes were expressed sporophytically. Meanwhile, retardation<br />
of pollen tube elongation was observed when Akihikari (japonica type) was poll<strong>in</strong>ated with IR58. The genetic analysis suggested<br />
that both female and male reactions <strong>in</strong> Akihikari were controlled by dom<strong>in</strong>ant genes, confirm<strong>in</strong>g that the genes for cross<strong>in</strong>compatibility<br />
are present <strong>in</strong> closely related relatives of rice.<br />
Cross<strong>in</strong>g barriers are frequently recognized <strong>in</strong> rice when distantly<br />
related taxa are <strong>in</strong>tercrossed. A range of variation <strong>in</strong> the<br />
rate of success is also found <strong>in</strong> crosses between taxa shar<strong>in</strong>g<br />
the primary gene pool (Chu et al 1969, Sitch and Romero 1990).<br />
Attention has been given to rice only <strong>in</strong> crosses with distantly<br />
related taxa s<strong>in</strong>ce hybrid seeds are obta<strong>in</strong>ed even <strong>in</strong> crosses<br />
show<strong>in</strong>g a reduced seed set. Recently, both pre- and<br />
postfertilization barriers have been detected after <strong>in</strong>troduc<strong>in</strong>g<br />
alien genes from wild rice <strong>in</strong>to cultivated rice, and both cases<br />
showed unidirectional cross-<strong>in</strong>compatibility (Okuno 1996,<br />
Sano 1992). Here we compared the genetic basis <strong>in</strong> the two<br />
cross-<strong>in</strong>compatibility systems <strong>in</strong> rice.<br />
Postfertilization barrier <strong>in</strong> a cross with wild rice<br />
Reduced seed set was found dur<strong>in</strong>g backcross<strong>in</strong>g between<br />
T65wx (near-isogenic l<strong>in</strong>e, NIL, with wx) and W593 (Oryza<br />
rufipogon from Malaysia). A segment of chromosome 6 was<br />
<strong>in</strong>troduced from W593 <strong>in</strong>to T65wx and the resultant NIL produced<br />
many shrunken seeds when it was aga<strong>in</strong> backcrossed<br />
with T65wx, although the reciprocal cross showed a high seed<br />
set (Sano 1992). A histological observation revealed that the<br />
cell division <strong>in</strong> the young embryo seemed to proceed normally<br />
but showed an overgrowth with deformed tissue differentiation<br />
10 d after poll<strong>in</strong>ation. In contrast, the triploid endosperm<br />
deteriorated with<strong>in</strong> a few days after poll<strong>in</strong>ation, suggest<strong>in</strong>g that<br />
the aborted seeds resulted from irregularities <strong>in</strong> the formation<br />
of endosperm as often found <strong>in</strong> wide crosses. Unidirectional<br />
cross-<strong>in</strong>compatibility was controlled by a dom<strong>in</strong>ant gene located<br />
near C (Chromogen). The alien segment was dissected<br />
<strong>in</strong> the backcrossed population with restriction fragment length<br />
polymorphism (RFLP) markers. Unexpectedly, no cross-<strong>in</strong>compatibility<br />
was found when the plant with an alien segment<br />
around the centromere was used as the pollen parent <strong>in</strong>stead<br />
of T65wx.<br />
These observations led us to believe that the unidirectional<br />
cross-<strong>in</strong>compatibility was regulated by the female and<br />
male reactions. Accord<strong>in</strong>gly, the causal gene near C was designated<br />
C<strong>in</strong>f (Cross-<strong>in</strong>compatibility <strong>in</strong> the female reaction) and<br />
that near the centromere was c<strong>in</strong>m (cross-<strong>in</strong>compatibility <strong>in</strong><br />
330 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
Table 1. Percent crossability among crosses <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g genotypes C<strong>in</strong>f, c<strong>in</strong>m,<br />
or Su-C<strong>in</strong>f between W593 and T65wx. a<br />
Comb<strong>in</strong>ation cross Spikelets Seeds obta<strong>in</strong>ed (no.) Crossability<br />
poll<strong>in</strong>ated (%)<br />
Female Male (no.) Normal Aborted<br />
C<strong>in</strong>f/C<strong>in</strong>f c<strong>in</strong>m/c<strong>in</strong>m 331 40 157 12.1<br />
C<strong>in</strong>f/C<strong>in</strong>f C<strong>in</strong>m/C<strong>in</strong>m 59 36 1 61.0<br />
C<strong>in</strong>f/C<strong>in</strong>f C<strong>in</strong>m/c<strong>in</strong>m 68 38 4 55.8<br />
Su-C<strong>in</strong>f/su-C<strong>in</strong>f c<strong>in</strong>m/c<strong>in</strong>m 105 65 7 61.9<br />
su-C<strong>in</strong>f/su-C<strong>in</strong>f c<strong>in</strong>m/c<strong>in</strong>m 186 15 98 8.1<br />
a The NILs of T65wx were used for the cross experiments. The genotype of T65wx was c<strong>in</strong>fc<strong>in</strong>f<br />
c<strong>in</strong>mc<strong>in</strong>m su-C<strong>in</strong>fsu-C<strong>in</strong>f. C<strong>in</strong>f and Su-C<strong>in</strong>f were <strong>in</strong>troduced <strong>in</strong>to T65wx from W593 and Patpaku,<br />
respectively, while C<strong>in</strong>m was from both donors. C<strong>in</strong>m and Su-C<strong>in</strong>f were located near the centromere<br />
of chromosome 6 based on RFLP analysis.<br />
Table 2. Percent crossability and rate a of pollen tubes that reached<br />
the micropyle <strong>in</strong> crosses among IR58, Akihikai, and the F 1 .<br />
Cross-comb<strong>in</strong>ation Spikelets Crossability Rate of pollen<br />
poll<strong>in</strong>ated (%) tubes that<br />
Female Male (no.) reached the<br />
micropyle (%)<br />
IR58 IR58 100 82.0 75.0<br />
Akihikari Akihikari 119 96.6 80.6<br />
IR58 Akihikari 69 0.0 0.0<br />
IR58 F 1 21 9.5 4.5<br />
F 1 Akihikari 36 55.6 60.0<br />
Fig. 1. Growth of pollen tubes observed 4 h after<br />
poll<strong>in</strong>ation when Akihikari (A) and IR58 (B) were<br />
poll<strong>in</strong>ated with Akihikari.<br />
No. of pollen tubes that reached micropyle<br />
Rate = × 100<br />
No. of germ<strong>in</strong>ated pollen gra<strong>in</strong>s<br />
the male reaction). Cross<strong>in</strong>g experiments showed that both<br />
genes acted sporophytically (Table 1). The gene c<strong>in</strong>m seemed<br />
to be widely distributed <strong>in</strong> japonica-type rice s<strong>in</strong>ce a reduced<br />
seed set was frequently found when it was poll<strong>in</strong>ated to C<strong>in</strong>f<br />
plants. However, it was noted that a reduced seed set was seldom<br />
detected <strong>in</strong> crosses with <strong>in</strong>dica type. To look <strong>in</strong>to the genetic<br />
constitutions of <strong>in</strong>dica rice, the short arm of chromosome<br />
6 was <strong>in</strong>troduced from Patpaku <strong>in</strong>to T65wx by backcrosses.<br />
The NIL gave a high seed set when poll<strong>in</strong>ated to the<br />
pistils of the C<strong>in</strong>f genotype, suggest<strong>in</strong>g that the segment from<br />
Patpaku might carry C<strong>in</strong>m-like W593.<br />
When T65wx was poll<strong>in</strong>ated to the hybrid between the<br />
two NILs carry<strong>in</strong>g C<strong>in</strong>f from W593 or C<strong>in</strong>m from Patpaku,<br />
the cross was expected to give a reduced seed set s<strong>in</strong>ce C<strong>in</strong>f<br />
was dom<strong>in</strong>ant. However, the result <strong>in</strong>dicated that the segment<br />
<strong>in</strong>troduced from Patpaku carried not only C<strong>in</strong>m but also another<br />
gene suppress<strong>in</strong>g C<strong>in</strong>f <strong>in</strong> the female reaction. The suppressor<br />
seemed to be dom<strong>in</strong>ant s<strong>in</strong>ce the heterozygote gave a<br />
normal seed set when poll<strong>in</strong>ated with T65wx, suggest<strong>in</strong>g that<br />
the gene was also expressed sporophytically (Table 1). The<br />
suppressor was tentatively designated Su-C<strong>in</strong>f. Thus, the cross<strong>in</strong>compatibility<br />
was controlled by at least three genes, all of<br />
which acted sporophytically and were located on the short arm<br />
of chromosome 6.<br />
Prefertilization barrier <strong>in</strong> a varietal cross<br />
Recently, it was reported that IR58 showed a reduced seed set<br />
when poll<strong>in</strong>ated with Akihikari (japonica type), whereas the<br />
reciprocal cross showed a normal seed set (Okuno 1996). Fluorescence<br />
microscopic observation revealed that retardation <strong>in</strong><br />
pollen tube growth was the cause of the cross-<strong>in</strong>compatibility,<br />
suggest<strong>in</strong>g the presence of a prefertilization barrier (Fig. 1).<br />
Although this is the first example of cross-<strong>in</strong>compatibility<br />
with<strong>in</strong> O. sativa, it was speculated that this might have resulted<br />
from wide hybridization when a resistance gene for<br />
grassy stunt virus from wild rice was <strong>in</strong>troduced (Okuno 1996),<br />
suggest<strong>in</strong>g that caution must be exercised when us<strong>in</strong>g alien<br />
germplasm <strong>in</strong> the future.<br />
The cross-<strong>in</strong>compatibility was reconfirmed at Sapporo<br />
based on seed set <strong>in</strong> the reciprocal crosses. A high seed set<br />
was observed when the F 1 was poll<strong>in</strong>ated with pollen gra<strong>in</strong>s of<br />
Akihikari, but not when pollen gra<strong>in</strong>s of the F 1 were applied to<br />
the pistils of IR58. In addition, the growth of pollen tubes after<br />
germ<strong>in</strong>ation was related to the degree of seed set <strong>in</strong> the<br />
crosses (Table 2). This <strong>in</strong>dicated that the arrest of the growth<br />
of pollen tubes was the causal factor. Results suggested that<br />
the cross-<strong>in</strong>compatibility was controlled by a recessive gene(s)<br />
Molecular markers, QTL mapp<strong>in</strong>g, and marker-assisted selection 331
<strong>in</strong> the female reaction, but by a dom<strong>in</strong>ant gene(s) <strong>in</strong> the male<br />
reaction.<br />
The growth of pollen tubes was <strong>in</strong>vestigated to exam<strong>in</strong>e<br />
F 2 segregation. The female and male reactions <strong>in</strong> each plant<br />
were estimated by cross<strong>in</strong>g to IR58 and with Akihikari, respectively<br />
(Fig. 1). The result showed that the female and male<br />
reactions seemed to be <strong>in</strong>dependently <strong>in</strong>herited, suggest<strong>in</strong>g that<br />
the gene(s) controll<strong>in</strong>g the female and male reactions could be<br />
recomb<strong>in</strong>ed.<br />
References<br />
Chu YE, Morishima H, Oka HI. 1969. Reproductive barriers distributed<br />
<strong>in</strong> cultivated rice species and their wild relatives. Jpn.<br />
J. Genet. 44:207-223.<br />
Okuno K. 1996. Partial cross-<strong>in</strong>compatibility <strong>in</strong> cultivated rice. <strong>Rice</strong><br />
Genet. Newsl. 13:117-118.<br />
Sano Y. 1992. Genetic comparisons of chromosome 6 between wild<br />
and cultivated rice. Jpn. J. Breed. 42:561-572.<br />
Sitch LA, Romero GO. 1990. Attempts to overcome prefertilization<br />
<strong>in</strong>compatibility <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>terspecific and <strong>in</strong>tergeneric crosses <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Oryza sativa L. Genome 33:321-327.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ addresses: K. Matsubara, R. Suzuki, Kh<strong>in</strong>-Tidar, and Y.<br />
Sano, Faculty of Agriculture, Hokkaido University, Sapporo<br />
060-8589; K. Okuno, Hokkaido National Agricultural Experiment<br />
Station, Hitsujigaoka, Sapporo 062-0045, Japan.<br />
Female reaction (%)<br />
80<br />
60<br />
40<br />
20<br />
0<br />
Akihikari<br />
F 1<br />
IR58<br />
20 40 60 80<br />
Male reaction (%)<br />
Fig. 2. Segregation pattern of the cross-<strong>in</strong>compatibility<br />
<strong>in</strong> female and male reactions <strong>in</strong> F 2 plants of IR58 ×<br />
Akihikari. The cross-<strong>in</strong>compatibility of each plant was<br />
estimated from the rates of pollen tubes reach<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
micropyle when crossed to IR58 ( ) for the male reaction<br />
and when crossed with Akihikari ( ) for the female<br />
reaction.<br />
Relationship between genetic distance and heterosis<br />
under different fertilizer applications <strong>in</strong> rice<br />
Z.Z. Piao, Y.I. Cho, and H.J. Koh<br />
The 36 F 1<br />
s from a half-diallel cross among n<strong>in</strong>e parents, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g five <strong>in</strong>dicas (Dasanbyeo, Nonanbyeo, Milyang23, Guichow,<br />
and CP-SLO), two japonicas (Hapcheon 1 and TR22183), and two new plant type (NPT) l<strong>in</strong>es (IR66167-27-5-1-6, IR66746-<br />
76-3-2), were grown under different fertilizer conditions. Heterosis was highest for gra<strong>in</strong> yield <strong>in</strong> both fertilized and unfertilized<br />
conditions, 60.4% and 11.6%, respectively. The extent of heterosis for all characters except gra<strong>in</strong> fertility was significantly<br />
higher <strong>in</strong> N-fertilized plots than <strong>in</strong> N-unfertilized plots. The 55 random decamers amplified 228 bands from the genomic DNAs<br />
of n<strong>in</strong>e parents, with an average of 4.16 bands per primer. Of these, 128 bands (56%) were polymorphic. Genetic distance<br />
among parents ranged from 0.128 to 0.411; the closest was between IR66167-27-5-1-6 and IR66746-76-3-2 and the<br />
farthest was between Dasanbyeo and TR22183. The n<strong>in</strong>e parents were clustered <strong>in</strong>to three groups. Significant positive correlations<br />
were found between genetic distance and dry matter and gra<strong>in</strong> yield <strong>in</strong> N-fertilized conditions, but not <strong>in</strong> N-unfertilized<br />
conditions. This <strong>in</strong>dicated that prediction of heterosis through genetic distance among parents based on random amplified<br />
polymorphic DNA analysis is possible under normal N application.<br />
Hybrid rice breed<strong>in</strong>g has been successful via the development<br />
of superior hybrids and the <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> outcross<strong>in</strong>g rates for<br />
hybrid seed production (Virmani 1994). In <strong>in</strong>tervarietal F 1 hybrids,<br />
a standard maximum 40% heterosis <strong>in</strong> gra<strong>in</strong> yield was<br />
recorded (Koh et al 1990). In <strong>in</strong>tersubspecific hybrids, a yield<br />
<strong>in</strong>crease of 30% over the exist<strong>in</strong>g best <strong>in</strong>tervarietal hybrid varieties<br />
is expected (Yuan 1994). Kato et al (1994) reported<br />
that heterosis <strong>in</strong> hybrids from crosses between <strong>in</strong>dica and<br />
japonica varieties was generally larger than that <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>tervarietal<br />
hybrids. Significant relationships were observed between the<br />
heterosis of biomass and the polymorphism of isozymes and<br />
restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) markers.<br />
332 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
Prediction of heterosis prior to field evaluation of F 1 hybrids<br />
may promote the rapid and economical development of heterotic<br />
hybrid comb<strong>in</strong>ations. Many researchers have reported<br />
on the possibility of predict<strong>in</strong>g F 1 yield via the estimation of<br />
genetic distances by DNA markers. Recently, because of grow<strong>in</strong>g<br />
concern about the environment, environment-favorable crop<br />
cultivation has been stressed through the use of fewer agrochemical<br />
<strong>in</strong>puts. Thus, studies on exploit<strong>in</strong>g heterosis under<br />
low fertilizer conditions are required.<br />
This study was carried out to exam<strong>in</strong>e heterosis for characters<br />
related to gra<strong>in</strong> yield <strong>in</strong> F 1 hybrids among japonica, <strong>in</strong>dica,<br />
and new plant type (NPT) rice varieties, and to <strong>in</strong>vestigate<br />
the relationship between heterosis and genetic distances<br />
among parents based on random amplified polymorphic DNA<br />
(RAPD) markers under N-fertilized and -unfertilized conditions.<br />
Materials and methods<br />
N<strong>in</strong>e parents, which <strong>in</strong>cluded four <strong>in</strong>dicas, two temperate<br />
japonicas, two NPT l<strong>in</strong>es, and one tropical japonica, and 36<br />
F 1 hybrids from half-diallel crosses were grown on the experimental<br />
rice field of Seoul National University <strong>in</strong> Suwon, Korea.<br />
The 36 F 1 hybrids and parents were seeded on 26 April<br />
and transplanted at one plant per hill on 29 May, with a plant<strong>in</strong>g<br />
density of 25 × 15 cm. Fertilizer was applied at two levels—ord<strong>in</strong>ary<br />
N fertilizer (N-P 2 O 5 -K 2 O = 100-80-80 kg ha –1 )<br />
and non-N fertilizer (N-P 2 O 5 -K 2 O = 0-80-80 kg ha –1 ). The<br />
field layout was a randomized block design with two replications.<br />
Each plot had 25 plants. Conventional cultural practices<br />
were adopted for weed, disease, and pest control.<br />
Heterosis for yield and yield components<br />
Dry weight per plant was measured at 43 d (maximum tiller<br />
stage) and 58 d (boot<strong>in</strong>g stage) after transplant<strong>in</strong>g. Nitrogen<br />
concentration (NC) <strong>in</strong> the shoot at the boot<strong>in</strong>g stage was analyzed<br />
by the Kjeldahl Nitrogen Analyzer. Total shoot nitrogen<br />
content (SNCB) and crop growth rate (CGR) were obta<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
by us<strong>in</strong>g the follow<strong>in</strong>g formula: total shoot nitrogen content at<br />
the boot<strong>in</strong>g stage per unit area (SNCB) = (NC × W2) × P<br />
[g m –2 ], and crop growth rate per unit area (CGR) = P × (W2 –<br />
W1) / (t2 – t1) [g m –2 d –1 ], where W1 and W2 are the shoot dry<br />
weights per plant measured at the maximum tiller<strong>in</strong>g and boot<strong>in</strong>g<br />
stage, respectively, and t1– t2 corresponds to 15 d from<br />
the maximum tiller<strong>in</strong>g to boot<strong>in</strong>g stage. Six agronomically<br />
important traits were exam<strong>in</strong>ed—culm length, panicle length,<br />
panicle number plant –1 , spikelets panicle –1 , gra<strong>in</strong> fertility, and<br />
gra<strong>in</strong> yield. The average data for two replications were used<br />
for evaluat<strong>in</strong>g heterosis and for correlation analysis.<br />
RAPD analysis and genetic diversity<br />
Genomic DNA was extracted from the leaves of n<strong>in</strong>e parents.<br />
Fifty-five random decamer primers (Operon Tech.) selected<br />
after a prelim<strong>in</strong>ary test were used to amplify the DNA of n<strong>in</strong>e<br />
parents. The polymerase cha<strong>in</strong> reaction (PCR) protocol used<br />
was as described by Ahn et al (1998).<br />
Genetic distances <strong>in</strong> 36 pairs of the n<strong>in</strong>e parents were<br />
estimated from RAPD data by Nei’s genetic distance equation<br />
(Nei 1987). Cluster analysis was done us<strong>in</strong>g the computer program<br />
NTSYS-PC with an unweighted pair group method<br />
(UPGMA). Heterosis <strong>in</strong> each character was denoted as midparental<br />
heterosis, which was a measure of the superiority of<br />
the F 1 over the mid-parental value. The relationship between<br />
the genetic distance of parents and heterosis/hybrid performance<br />
<strong>in</strong> the F 1 was evaluated by simple correlation analysis.<br />
Results and discussion<br />
Heterosis for agronomic traits<br />
Table 1 shows the means and ranges of performance and midparental<br />
heterosis (MPH) of 36 F 1 hybrids. Most of the characters<br />
exhibited much better performance <strong>in</strong> N-fertilized conditions<br />
than <strong>in</strong> N-unfertilized conditions as expected. However,<br />
gra<strong>in</strong> fertility, number of spikelets per panicle –1 , and<br />
panicle length did not decrease even <strong>in</strong> plants grown under N-<br />
unfertilized conditions, probably because plants grown under<br />
N-unfertilized conditions were able to susta<strong>in</strong> fewer but bigger<br />
panicles.<br />
The degree of heterosis varied considerably. Heterosis<br />
for yield ranged from –22.7% (Dasanbyeo/IR66746-76-3-2)<br />
to 73.4% (Dasanbyeo/TR22183) under N-unfertilized conditions,<br />
and 3.4% (Guichow/IR66746-76-3-2) to 262.1%<br />
(IR66746-76-3-2/TR22183) under N-fertilized conditions. The<br />
average heterosis for gra<strong>in</strong> yield under N-fertilized conditions<br />
(MPH: 60.4%) was much higher than <strong>in</strong> N-unfertilized conditions.<br />
Heterosis <strong>in</strong> N-unfertilized conditions was highest for<br />
gra<strong>in</strong> yield (MPH: 11.6%) among the traits exam<strong>in</strong>ed, followed<br />
by culm length, panicle length, spikelets per panicle, and dry<br />
weight plant –1 at the maximum tiller stage, and was generally<br />
much lower than <strong>in</strong> N-fertilized conditions. Heterosis for the<br />
other traits <strong>in</strong> N-unfertilized conditions was negligible or negative<br />
for gra<strong>in</strong> fertility. The reason that heterosis for gra<strong>in</strong> yield<br />
<strong>in</strong> N-unfertilized conditions was quite high even though there<br />
was negligible heterosis <strong>in</strong> dry matter production might be attributable<br />
to the heterosis for number of spikelets panicle –1 .<br />
Heterosis for shoot N content <strong>in</strong> N-unfertilized conditions was<br />
not detected, imply<strong>in</strong>g that N absorption ability of F 1 hybrids<br />
was not higher than that of their parents under N-deficient conditions.<br />
Murayama et al (1974) reported that heterosis <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>in</strong>tervarietal hybrids of japonica rice was not affected by plant<strong>in</strong>g<br />
density and fertilizer level. Park (1999) also reported that<br />
heterosis for all traits <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g gra<strong>in</strong> yield was higher under<br />
N-unfertilized conditions than under N-fertilized conditions<br />
among <strong>in</strong>tervarietal hybrids of japonica rice. Our results were<br />
not consistent with these two reports, presumably because of<br />
differences <strong>in</strong> plant materials, which had different responses<br />
to N. However, further data are needed to confirm our results.<br />
Molecular markers, QTL mapp<strong>in</strong>g, and marker-assisted selection 333
Table 1. Mean and range of hybrid performance and heterosis for growth characters and<br />
gra<strong>in</strong> yield <strong>in</strong> 36 F 1 hybrids under N-unfertilized and -fertilized conditions.<br />
Performance<br />
Mid-parent heterosis<br />
Character N level c Mean Range Mean Range<br />
Dry weight plant –1 (g) a 10 17.7 13.1–23.2 26.5 –20.1–68.4<br />
0 5.7 3.5–9.0 5.2 –33.3–62.5<br />
Dry weight plant – 1 (g) b 10 34.3 23.8–45.7 32.9 –3.0–98.2<br />
0 14.6 9.7–21.9 0.8 –44.5–55.3<br />
Shoot nitrogen content<br />
at boot<strong>in</strong>g stage 10 6.4 4.4–8.4 24.2 –28.1–111.3<br />
0 4.1 3.1–5.5 –1.3 –35.7–61.4<br />
Crop growth rate 10 28.1 5.6–38.1 46.5 –69.2–230.3<br />
0 15.1 7.4–23.1 –0.02 –59.3–94.7<br />
Culm length (cm) 10 93.9 73.9–114.8 19.1 –4.2–130.4<br />
0 83.1 69.9–96.4 11.5 –1.9–27.9<br />
Panicle length (cm) 10 28.9 25.4–31.3 11.2 0.8–30.5<br />
0 26.8 23.1–30.7 7.7 –3.3–21.7<br />
Panicles plant –1 (no.) 10 10.4 6.2–14.5 20.5 –23.2–100.0<br />
0 6.0 3.0–7.8 –0.7 –33.3–72.0<br />
Spikelets panicle –1 (no.) 10 287.7 228.2–386.3 –0.6 –22.6–29.0<br />
0 286.0 208.8–432.8 6.0 –12.7–38.3<br />
Gra<strong>in</strong> fertility (%) 10 80.3 29.9–95.4 –7.3 –64.7–16.7<br />
0 84.6 39.8–96.7 –6.3 –56.6–19.7<br />
Gra<strong>in</strong> yield (kg ha –1 ) 10 1,068 1,029–1,531 60.4 –3.4–262.1<br />
0 641 425–864 11.6 –22.7–73.4<br />
a Maximum tiller<strong>in</strong>g stage. b Boot<strong>in</strong>g stage. c 10 = N-fertilized condition (N-P 2 O 5 -K 2 O = 100-80-80 kg ha –1 ). 0 = N-<br />
unfertilized condition (N- P 2 O 5 -K 2 O = 0-80-80 kg ha –1 ).<br />
Table 2. Genetic distances a among the n<strong>in</strong>e parents based on RAPD analysis with 55 random decamers.<br />
Parent b IR6 IR2 DS NA M23 GC TR HC<br />
IR66167-27-5-1-6 (IR6) –<br />
IR66746-76-3-2 (IR2) 0.128 a –<br />
Dasanbyeo (DS) 0.342 0.279 –<br />
Nonganbyeo (NA) 0.298 0.298 0.235 –<br />
Milyang23 (M23) 0.294 0.268 0.131 0.169 –<br />
Guichow (GC) 0.288 0.327 0.272 0.248 0.213 –<br />
TR22183 (TR) 0.198 0.199 0.411 0.236 0.280 0.392 –<br />
Hapcheon1 (HC) 0.260 0.189 0.284 0.248 0.307 0.365 0.155 –<br />
CP-SLO (CP) 0.189 0.185 0.295 0.224 0.283 0.315 0.279 0.197<br />
a Genetic distance = (1 – SM), SM = simple match<strong>in</strong>g coefficient. b Indica: Dasanbyeo, Nonganbyeo, Milyang23, Guichow; temperate<br />
japonica: TR22183, Hapcheon 1; tropical japonica: CP-SLO; NPT l<strong>in</strong>es: IR66167-27-5-1-6, IR66746-76-3-2.<br />
RAPD analysis, genetic diversity, and heterosis<br />
The number of dist<strong>in</strong>ct bands amplified by each primer ranged<br />
from 1 to 8. The 55 RAPD primers amplified a total of 228<br />
bands from the genomic DNA of n<strong>in</strong>e parents, with an average<br />
of 4.16 bands per primer. Of the 228 bands, 128 (56%) produced<br />
at least one polymorphic band differentiat<strong>in</strong>g at least<br />
one from the other parent. Genetic distances among n<strong>in</strong>e parents<br />
(Table 2) ranged from 0.131 to 0.411; the closest was<br />
between Dasanbyeo and Milyang23 and the farthest was between<br />
Dasanbyeo and TR22183. Cluster analysis based on<br />
genetic distances differentiated the n<strong>in</strong>e parents <strong>in</strong>to two major<br />
groups that can be considered as <strong>in</strong>dica and japonica (Fig.<br />
1). With<strong>in</strong> the japonica cluster, two subgroups were apparent:<br />
one was for NPT l<strong>in</strong>es (IR66167-27-5-1-6, IR66746-76-3-2)<br />
and the tropical japonica variety (CP-SLO) and the other was<br />
for temperate japonica varieties (TR22183, Hapcheon1). The<br />
two NPT l<strong>in</strong>es were important for the tropical japonica group.<br />
These results are consistent with the reports of Glaszmann<br />
(1987).<br />
Table 3 shows the correlation coefficients between genetic<br />
distance based on RAPD analysis and the performance/<br />
heterosis of 36 F 1 hybrids. A significantly positive correlation<br />
was found between genetic distance and heterosis for dry weight<br />
at the boot<strong>in</strong>g stage (r = 0.360*), crop growth rate (r = 0.402**),<br />
panicle length (r = 0.473**), and gra<strong>in</strong> yield (r = 0.329*) <strong>in</strong> N-<br />
fertilized conditions. This <strong>in</strong>dicated that the farther the genetic<br />
distance between the parents, the better the performance of<br />
the F 1 hybrids. No significant correlation was found under N-<br />
334 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
Dasanbyeo<br />
Milyang23<br />
Nonganbyeo<br />
Guichow<br />
IR66167-27-5-1-6<br />
IR66746-76-3-2<br />
CP-SLO<br />
Hapocheon1<br />
TR22183<br />
0.06 0.10 0.14 0.18 0.22 0.26 0.30<br />
Genetic distance<br />
Fig. 1. Dendrogram of the n<strong>in</strong>e<br />
rice parents based on genetic distance<br />
by RAPD analysis.<br />
Table 3. Correlation coefficients between genetic distance and heterosis for<br />
growth characters and gra<strong>in</strong> yield <strong>in</strong> 36 F 1 hybrids grown under N-fertilized and<br />
-unfertilized conditions.<br />
Characters<br />
N-fertilized<br />
N-unfertilized<br />
Performance Mid-parent Performance Mid-parent<br />
heterosis heterosis<br />
GD-dry weight a 0.012 –0.126 0.312 0.189<br />
GD-dry weight b 0.354 d 0.360 * 0.304 0.202<br />
GD-SNCB c 0.137 0.102 0.164 0.111<br />
GD-CGR 0.356 * 0.402 ** 0.225 0.126<br />
GD-culm length –0.005 0.164 –0.057 0.056<br />
GD-panicle length 0.190 0.473 ** 0.138 0.319<br />
GD-panicles plant –1 0.043 0.087 0.078 –0.040<br />
GD-spikelets panicle –1 0.187 0.279 –0.050 0.178<br />
GD-gra<strong>in</strong> fertility –0.494 ** –0.398 * –0.488 ** –0.397 *<br />
GD-gra<strong>in</strong> yield 0.492 ** 0.329 * 0.150 0.014<br />
a Maximum tiller<strong>in</strong>g stage. b Boot<strong>in</strong>g stage. c Shoot nitrogen content at boot<strong>in</strong>g stage. GD = genetic<br />
distance. d *, ** = significant at the 0.05 and 0.01 probability levels, respectively.<br />
unfertilized conditions except with gra<strong>in</strong> fertility. This might<br />
be due to the low level of heterosis <strong>in</strong> N-unfertilized conditions<br />
as shown <strong>in</strong> Table 1. For gra<strong>in</strong> fertility, there was a significantly<br />
negative correlation <strong>in</strong> both N-fertilized and -unfertilized<br />
conditions as expected, such that gra<strong>in</strong> fertility of F 1<br />
hybrids between parents of farther genetic distance would be<br />
lower. Ahn et al (1998) reported that genetic distance measures<br />
based on RAPDs were useful for predict<strong>in</strong>g yield and its<br />
heterosis of <strong>in</strong>tervarietal hybrids <strong>in</strong> japonica. Based on the results<br />
of this and previous studies, it seemed that genetic distances<br />
could be useful for predict<strong>in</strong>g hybrid yield. However,<br />
the accuracy might vary along with the parental varieties and<br />
grow<strong>in</strong>g conditions of hybrids. Based on the results of this and<br />
previous studies, it seemed that genetic distances could be useful<br />
<strong>in</strong> predict<strong>in</strong>g hybrid yield. However, the accuracy might<br />
vary depend<strong>in</strong>g on the parental varieties and grow<strong>in</strong>g conditions<br />
of hybrids.<br />
References<br />
Ahn SN, Kwak TS, Kang KH, Jeon YH, Choi HC, Moon HP. 1998.<br />
Relationship between heterosis and genetic distance as measured<br />
by RAPD analysis <strong>in</strong> rice. Kor. J. Breed 30(1):16-23.<br />
Glaszmann JC. 1987. Isozymes and classification of Asian rice varieties.<br />
Theor. Appl. Genet. 74:21-30.<br />
Kato H, Tanaka K, Nakazumi H, Araki H, Yoshida T, Ogi Y,<br />
Yanagihara S, Kishimoto N, Maruyama K. 1994. Heterosis of<br />
biomass among rice ecospecies and isozyme polymorphism<br />
and RFLP. Breed. Sci. 44:271-277.<br />
Koh HJ, Kim HY, Heu MH. 1990. Current status and future outlook<br />
on hybrid rice. Seoul Natl. Univ. J. Agric. Sci. 16(1):11-23.<br />
Murayama S, Omura T, Miyazato K. 1974. Basic studies on utiliza-<br />
Molecular markers, QTL mapp<strong>in</strong>g, and marker-assisted selection 335
tion of hybrid vigor <strong>in</strong> rice. IV. Heterosis under different cultural<br />
conditions. Jpn. J. Breed. 24:287-290.<br />
Nei M. 1987. Molecular evolutionary genetics. New York (USA):<br />
Columbia University Press.<br />
Park CW. 1999. Relationship between heterosis <strong>in</strong> F 1 hybrids and<br />
genetic similarity <strong>in</strong> parents as measured by RAPD and SSR<br />
analysis <strong>in</strong> japonica rice (Oryza sativa L.). MSc thesis. Seoul<br />
National University, Korea.<br />
Yuan LP. 1994. Increas<strong>in</strong>g yield potential <strong>in</strong> rice by exploitation of<br />
heterosis. In: Virmani SS, editor. Hybrid rice technology: new<br />
Notes<br />
developments and future prospects. Los Baños (Philipp<strong>in</strong>es):<br />
<strong>International</strong> <strong>Rice</strong> Research Institute. p 1-6.<br />
Authors’ address: School of Plant Science, College of Agriculture<br />
and Life Sciences, Seoul National University, Suwon 441-<br />
744, Korea.<br />
Acknowledgments: The authors thank the Research and Development<br />
Promotion Center for Agriculture and Forestry for its<br />
f<strong>in</strong>ancial support.<br />
Isolat<strong>in</strong>g and characteriz<strong>in</strong>g molecular markers associated<br />
with seedl<strong>in</strong>g-stage cold tolerance <strong>in</strong> rice<br />
K.M. Kim, I.K. Chung, T.S. Kwak, and J.K. Sohn<br />
The DNA marker associated with cold tolerance was cloned from random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) fragments<br />
amplified with genomic DNA of a rice cultivar, Dular. The nucleotide sequence revealed that the putative open read<strong>in</strong>g frame<br />
was 511 base pairs and conta<strong>in</strong>ed 169 am<strong>in</strong>o acid residues. It is 79% and 57% identical to the rice cDNA (C26347) found <strong>in</strong><br />
the GeneBank Database at the nucleotide and am<strong>in</strong>o acid sequence levels, respectively. Through RAPD analysis for the cold<br />
tolerance of 94 F 2<br />
plants from a cross between Dular (<strong>in</strong>dica, cold-sensitive cultivar) and Toyohatamochi (japonica, coldtolerant<br />
cultivar), OPT8 511<br />
was confirmed to have strong association with cold tolerance of rice. The clone OPT8 511<br />
was amplified<br />
from polymerase cha<strong>in</strong> reaction of genomic DNA <strong>in</strong> 21 rice cultivars by custom-made primer. This marker could be of use<br />
<strong>in</strong> marker-assisted selection for cold tolerance <strong>in</strong> rice.<br />
In this study, we described the identification of a molecular<br />
marker associated with cold tolerance <strong>in</strong> rice us<strong>in</strong>g the F 2 population<br />
from a cross between Dular (cold-sensitive cultivar) and<br />
Toyohatamochi (cold-tolerant cultivar).<br />
A random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) analysis<br />
was conducted to <strong>in</strong>vestigate the contribution of genomic<br />
DNA to the polymerase cha<strong>in</strong> reaction (PCR) patterns of 94<br />
F 2 plants from the mentioned cross. A polymorphic band of<br />
approximately 600 bp between Dular and Toyohatamochi was<br />
detected by the PCR analysis with OPT8 primers. Through<br />
quantitative trait locus (QTL) analysis, we selected a fragment<br />
of 600 bp (OPT8 600 ) related to cold tolerance <strong>in</strong> rice (Kim et<br />
al 1997, 1999). To characterize the polymorphic DNA fragment<br />
from Dular, we cloned and sequenced the selected fragment.<br />
The DNA fragment was 511 bp <strong>in</strong> length and encoded<br />
169 am<strong>in</strong>o acids. The nucleotide and deduced am<strong>in</strong>o acid sequences<br />
of OPT8 511 showed high homology to those of rice<br />
cDNA (SWISSPROT accession number C26347). The alignment<br />
of OPT8 511 sequence with C26347 sequence is shown <strong>in</strong><br />
Figure 1. OPT8 511 showed 79% identity at the nucleotide sequence<br />
level and 57% similarity to C26347 at the am<strong>in</strong>o acid<br />
level. The alignment of OPT8 511 sequence with the 22-kDa<br />
alpha ze<strong>in</strong> gene cluster of maize, two defense genes of tobacco<br />
(structural organization of str246C and str246N), and bacterial<br />
artificial chromosome (BAC) T24H24 of Arabidopsis<br />
thaliana showed 41%, 31%, and 24% identity, respectively.<br />
We found a highly significant correlation between the<br />
band pattern of OPT8 511 and cold tolerance of 21 rice cultivars<br />
(Fig. 2). The clone OPT8 511 was amplified, especially the<br />
511-bp band from the DNA of cold-sensitive cultivars (Dular,<br />
Hwaseongbyeo, Hwayeongbyeo, Junghwabyeo,<br />
Cheongcheongbyeo, Gihobyeo, Gayabyeo, IR36,<br />
Nonganbyeo). The RAPD marker OPT8 511 could be of use <strong>in</strong><br />
marker-assisted selection for cold tolerance <strong>in</strong> rice.<br />
References<br />
Kim KM, Park GH, Kim JH, Kwon YS, Sohn JK. 1999. Selection of<br />
RAPD marker for growth of seedl<strong>in</strong>gs at low temperature <strong>in</strong><br />
rice. Mol. Cells 9:265-269.<br />
Kim KM, Sohn JK, Kato A, Oono K. 1997. Analysis of a QTL associated<br />
with cold tolerance at seedl<strong>in</strong>g stage of rice by RAPD<br />
markers. Korean J. Breed. 29:342-348.<br />
Notes<br />
Author’s addresses: K.M. Kim and J.K Sohn, Department of<br />
Agronomy, College of Agriculture, Kyungpook National University,<br />
Taegu 702-701, Korea; I.K. Chung, Faculty of Life<br />
Resource, Catholic University of Taegu-Hyosung, Kyungsan,<br />
Kyungbuk 712-702, Korea; T.S. Kwak, College of Life Science<br />
and Resources, Sangji University, Weonju 220-702, Korea.<br />
336 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
A<br />
B<br />
Fig. 1. Alignment of clone OPT8 511 (1)<br />
with rice cDNA from callus (2)<br />
(SWISSPROT accession number<br />
C26347). Both nucleotide (A) and<br />
am<strong>in</strong>o acid alignments (B) are shown.<br />
Asterisks and the same letters represent<br />
identical nucleotide and<br />
am<strong>in</strong>o acid residues, respectively.<br />
M 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 M<br />
Fig. 2. DNA polymorphism detected by amplification of genomic DNA via PCR, us<strong>in</strong>g two specific<br />
20-mer primers, 5′-CGACAGTACCTCACAAAGAT-3′ and 5′-CGGCTGACGGAAAAACTTGC-3′. Arrow ()<br />
<strong>in</strong>dicates marker related to cold tolerance. M = DNA size marker lamda/H<strong>in</strong>dIII. <strong>Rice</strong> cultivars: 1<br />
= Dongj<strong>in</strong>byeo, 2 = Donghaebyeo, 3 = Naepungbyeo, 4 = Dular, 5 = Toyohatamochi, 6 =<br />
S<strong>in</strong>seonchalbyeo, 7 = Ilmibyeo, 8 = Ilpumbyeo, 9 = Chucheongbyeo, 10 = Hwanambyeo, 11 =<br />
Hwaseongbyeo, 12 = Hwayeongbyeo, 13 = Milyang 23, 14 = Junghwabyeo, 15 =<br />
Cheongcheongbyeo, 16 = Milyang 126, 17 = Milyang 146, 18 = Gihobyeo, 19 = Gayabyeo, 20<br />
= IR36, 21 = Nonganbyeo.<br />
Molecular markers, QTL mapp<strong>in</strong>g, and marker-assisted selection 337
QTL analysis for discoloration of flag leaves dur<strong>in</strong>g<br />
the ripen<strong>in</strong>g period <strong>in</strong> rice<br />
M. Obara, Y. Fukuta, M. Yano, T. Yamaya, and T. Sato<br />
Our study aimed to identify the putative quantitative trait loci (QTLs) associated with the discoloration of flag leaves dur<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
ripen<strong>in</strong>g period, us<strong>in</strong>g 98 BC 1<br />
F 6<br />
l<strong>in</strong>es derived from Nipponbare (japonica)/Kasalath (<strong>in</strong>dica). We used 245 restriction fragment<br />
length polymorphism markers to construct a framework l<strong>in</strong>kage map. We measured the chlorophyll content of flag leaves by the<br />
SPAD chlorophyll meter (M<strong>in</strong>olta Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) every 7 d with<strong>in</strong> 5 wk from flower<strong>in</strong>g. These SPAD values were used for<br />
the maximum content of chlorophyll and the half-life period of chlorophyll content. QTL analysis was conducted us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>terval<br />
analysis (QGENE). The half-life period of chlorophyll content of Kasalath was shorter than that of Nipponbare. Two putative QTLs<br />
associated with maximum chlorophyll content were mapped on chromosomes 6 and 9. A QTL associated with maximum<br />
chlorophyll content on chromosome 6 was close to the region associated with flower<strong>in</strong>g date. Three putative QTLs associated<br />
with the half-life period of chlorophyll content were mapped on chromosomes 3, 6, and 10. A QTL associated with the half-life<br />
period of chlorophyll content on chromosome 6 co<strong>in</strong>cided with the region associated with gra<strong>in</strong> weight.<br />
The photosynthetic products from the upper leaves are the<br />
major source of organic matter for develop<strong>in</strong>g gra<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong> rice<br />
plants. Therefore, the duration from expansion to discoloration<br />
of the leaf is critical <strong>in</strong> determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the productivity of the<br />
rice plant. Two remarkable events accompany leaf senescence:<br />
one is a decl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> photosynthesis activity and the other is<br />
remobilization of nutrients. In Sasanishiki, a popular lowland<br />
rice <strong>in</strong> northern Japan, senesc<strong>in</strong>g leaf blades contribute about<br />
50% of total nitrogen <strong>in</strong> panicles (Mae and Ohira 1981). Two<br />
upper leaf blades (flag leaf and second leaf) contribute 70–<br />
80% of the carbohydrates <strong>in</strong> the gra<strong>in</strong>. Nitrogen is one of the<br />
most remobilizable elements dur<strong>in</strong>g the reproductive stage of<br />
the rice plant (Tanaka 1956). N content <strong>in</strong> the leaves is closely<br />
related to photosynthetic activity. Therefore, the senescence<br />
of upper leaves dur<strong>in</strong>g the reproductive stage is directly related<br />
to gra<strong>in</strong> productivity. Leaf senescence is faster <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>dica<br />
than <strong>in</strong> japonica rice cultivars and <strong>in</strong> warm regions than <strong>in</strong><br />
cool regions (Yoshida 1981).<br />
In this <strong>in</strong>vestigation, we determ<strong>in</strong>ed the putative quantitative<br />
trait loci (QTLs) associated with the discoloration of<br />
flag leaves dur<strong>in</strong>g the ripen<strong>in</strong>g period.<br />
Materials and methods<br />
N<strong>in</strong>ety-eight BC 1 F 6 l<strong>in</strong>es developed from a backcross (BC 1 F 1 )<br />
of Nipponbare (japonica)/Kasalath (<strong>in</strong>dica)//Nipponbare at the<br />
National Institute of Agrobiological Resources were used. A<br />
l<strong>in</strong>kage map of 245 restriction fragment length polymorphism<br />
(RFLP) markers used for QTL analysis was obta<strong>in</strong>ed from the<br />
<strong>Rice</strong> Genome Project <strong>in</strong> Japan (L<strong>in</strong> et al 1998). We used 245<br />
RFLP markers to construct a framework l<strong>in</strong>kage map.<br />
Germ<strong>in</strong>ated seeds of the 98 backcross <strong>in</strong>bred l<strong>in</strong>es (BILs)<br />
and the two parents were sown on the nursery bed. Three nursery<br />
plants were grown <strong>in</strong> 4-liter pots with 3 kg of soil supplemented<br />
with 4.0 g of slow-release fertilizer (N, 16%; P 2 O 5 ,<br />
16%; K 2 O, 16%) <strong>in</strong> a greenhouse (Yamaya et al 1997). The<br />
chlorophyll content of flag leaves was measured us<strong>in</strong>g a SPAD<br />
chlorophyll meter (M<strong>in</strong>olta) every 7 d with<strong>in</strong> 5 wk from flower<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
The SPAD values were used to calculate the maximum<br />
content of chlorophyll and the half-life period of chlorophyll<br />
content. The aerial parts of the plants were harvested 1 wk<br />
after head<strong>in</strong>g and were dried <strong>in</strong> a well-ventilated room. After<br />
dry<strong>in</strong>g, gra<strong>in</strong> weight and gra<strong>in</strong> size were measured.<br />
QTL analysis was conducted us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>terval analysis<br />
(QGENE version 2.29) (Nelson 1997).<br />
Results and discussion<br />
The half-life of chlorophyll content of flag leaves <strong>in</strong> Kasalath<br />
was shorter than that of flag leaves <strong>in</strong> Nipponbare. Three putative<br />
QTLs associated with the half-life of chlorophyll content<br />
were identified on chromosomes 3, 6, and 10 (Fig. 1).<br />
One of these QTLs, l<strong>in</strong>ked to marker R2547 on chromosome<br />
6, co<strong>in</strong>cided with the chromosomal region associated with gra<strong>in</strong><br />
weight. In QTL analysis us<strong>in</strong>g 191 BILs derived from Akihikari<br />
(japonica) and Milyang 23 (<strong>in</strong>dica), we detected putative QTLs<br />
associated with discoloration and gra<strong>in</strong> weight on the same<br />
region of chromosome 6 (unpublished data). Kasalath alleles<br />
shortened the half-life of chlorophyll of putative QTLs on chromosomes<br />
3 and 6, whereas Nipponbare alleles shortened the<br />
half-life of chlorophyll of putative QTLs on chromosome 10.<br />
The maximum chlorophyll content of flag leaves <strong>in</strong><br />
Kasalath was lower than that <strong>in</strong> Nipponbare. Two putative<br />
QTLs associated with maximum chlorophyll content were identified<br />
on chromosomes 6 and 9. One of these QTLs was close<br />
to the chromosomal region associated with flower<strong>in</strong>g date. The<br />
maximum chlorophyll contents of early flower<strong>in</strong>g l<strong>in</strong>es were<br />
higher than those of late-flower<strong>in</strong>g l<strong>in</strong>es.<br />
Leaf senescence of the upper leaves dur<strong>in</strong>g ripen<strong>in</strong>g is<br />
very important for determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g gra<strong>in</strong> yield. Previous results<br />
showed that a few <strong>in</strong>dica cultivars, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g Kasalath, conta<strong>in</strong><br />
more GS1 prote<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> senesc<strong>in</strong>g leaf blades than japonica<br />
cultivars (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g Nipponbare) (Yamaya et al 1997, Obara<br />
et al 2000). Further studies are needed to understand the mecha-<br />
338 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
cM<br />
0<br />
50<br />
100<br />
R1925<br />
R1927<br />
R3226<br />
R1618<br />
C595<br />
C944<br />
C746<br />
C136<br />
R250<br />
R19<br />
G332<br />
C80<br />
C1677<br />
C361<br />
R2170<br />
C1135<br />
R3156<br />
C1488<br />
C63<br />
C563<br />
C25<br />
C515<br />
R2869<br />
R1962<br />
C191B<br />
C498<br />
R1954<br />
L688<br />
G200<br />
R2147<br />
C1478<br />
R2171<br />
R2123<br />
R2654<br />
R437<br />
C214<br />
G122<br />
R674<br />
R2549<br />
C358<br />
C556<br />
R2071<br />
R11<br />
R1888<br />
R1608<br />
C607<br />
R1167<br />
Half-life period of chlorophyll content<br />
Flower<strong>in</strong>g date<br />
Maximum chlorophyll content<br />
Gra<strong>in</strong> weight<br />
C711<br />
R1164<br />
C701<br />
R1587<br />
C1454<br />
G103<br />
R79<br />
R1751<br />
G385<br />
R2272<br />
R2638<br />
C609<br />
C1263<br />
C570<br />
C506<br />
G293<br />
R1933<br />
R2174<br />
R2194<br />
R1629<br />
R2447<br />
C1286<br />
C1369<br />
R1877<br />
C488<br />
R716<br />
C809<br />
G127<br />
C223<br />
Chr 3 Chr 6 Chr 9 Chr 10<br />
Fig. 1. L<strong>in</strong>kage map and positions of QTLs for maximum chlorophyll content and the half-life period of chlorophyll content,<br />
gra<strong>in</strong> weight, and flower<strong>in</strong>g date. An LOD fall-off of 2.0 was used to def<strong>in</strong>e the borders of the confidence <strong>in</strong>tervals for<br />
QTLs. Arrowhead <strong>in</strong>dicates the position of putative QTLs.<br />
nism of senescence of leaves and its <strong>in</strong>teractions with other<br />
traits such as nutrient mobilization.<br />
References<br />
L<strong>in</strong> SY, Sasaki T, Yano M. 1998. Mapp<strong>in</strong>g quantitative trait loci<br />
controll<strong>in</strong>g seed dormancy and head<strong>in</strong>g date <strong>in</strong> rice, Oryza<br />
sativa L., us<strong>in</strong>g backcross <strong>in</strong>bred l<strong>in</strong>es. Theor. Appl. Genet.<br />
96:997-1003.<br />
Mae T, Ohira K. 1981. The remobilization of nitrogen related to leaf<br />
growth and senescence <strong>in</strong> rice plants (Oryza sativa L.). Plant<br />
Cell Physiol. 22:1067-1074.<br />
Nelson C. 1997. QGENE: software for marker-based genomic analysis<br />
and breed<strong>in</strong>g. Mol. Breed. 3:239-245.<br />
Obara M, Sato T, Yamaya T. 2000. High content of cytosolic<br />
glutam<strong>in</strong>e synthetase does not accompany a high activity of<br />
the enzyme <strong>in</strong> rice (Oryza sativa) leaves of <strong>in</strong>dica cultivars.<br />
Physiol. Plant. 108:11-18.<br />
Tanaka A. 1956. Studies on characteristics of physiological function<br />
of leaf at def<strong>in</strong>ite position on stem of rice plant. 3. Relation<br />
between nitrogen metabolism and physiological function of<br />
leaf at def<strong>in</strong>ite position. J. Sci. Soil. Manure Jpn. 26:413-418.<br />
Yamaya T, Obara M, Hayakawa T, Sato T. 1997. Comparison of<br />
contents for cytosolic-glutam<strong>in</strong>e synthetase and NADH-dependent<br />
glutamate synthase prote<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> leaves of japonica, <strong>in</strong>dica<br />
and javanica rice plants. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 43:1107-<br />
1112.<br />
Yoshida S. 1981. Fundamentals of rice crop science. Manila (Philipp<strong>in</strong>es):<br />
<strong>International</strong> <strong>Rice</strong> Research Institute. 269 p.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ addresses: M. Obara, T. Yamaya, Department of Applied<br />
Plant Science, Graduate School of Agricultural Sciences,<br />
Tohoku University, 1-1 Tsutsumidori-Amemiyamachi, Aobaku,<br />
Sendai 981-8555, Japan; Y. Fukuta, Plant Breed<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>Genetics</strong>,<br />
and Biochemistry Division, <strong>International</strong> <strong>Rice</strong> Research<br />
Institute, DAPO Box 7777, Metro Manila, Philipp<strong>in</strong>es; M.<br />
Yano, <strong>Rice</strong> Genome Research Program, National Institute of<br />
Agrobiological Resources, 2-1-2 Kannonndai, Tsukuba 305-<br />
8602, Japan; T. Sato, Institute of Genetic Ecology, Tohoku<br />
University, 2-1-1 Katahira, Aoba-ku, Sendai 980-8577, Japan.<br />
Molecular markers, QTL mapp<strong>in</strong>g, and marker-assisted selection 339
QTL analysis of root vitality <strong>in</strong> a doubled-haploid population<br />
derived from anther culture of <strong>in</strong>dica/japonica rice<br />
Teng Sheng, Zeng Dali, Zheng Xianwu, K. Yasufumi, Qian Qian, and Zhu Lihuang<br />
Root vitality <strong>in</strong> rice is important to the growth and development of every aboveground part. A doubled-haploid (DH) population<br />
derived from anther culture of ZYQ8/JX17 F 1<br />
, a typical <strong>in</strong>dica and japonica hybrid, was used <strong>in</strong> this study. Root vitality of 134<br />
DH l<strong>in</strong>es was detected by determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the reduction ability of TTC <strong>in</strong> the head<strong>in</strong>g period. Root vitality isn’t correlated to root<br />
morphological characters. A QTL was detected between RG449 and RRF09_1 on chromosome 4. Its LOD score and variation<br />
were 2.59 and 10.4%, respectively. Its additive effect was –1.6245. This QTL was from ZYQ8.<br />
Root vitality is the basis of vigorous growth <strong>in</strong> the vegetative<br />
stage and gra<strong>in</strong> fill<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the reproductive stage. There is a<br />
close relation between the physiological activity of the root<br />
and leaf senescence (Qiu et al 1981). Some QTLs for rice root<br />
growth characteristics such as root length, root thickness, and<br />
root penetration have been identified (Price et al 1997, Yadav<br />
et al 1997). In this study, a pair of typical japonica/<strong>in</strong>dica rice<br />
varieties (ZYQ8/JX17) and their doubled-haploid (DH) populations<br />
were used for QTL analysis of rice root vitality.<br />
Materials and methods<br />
A typical <strong>in</strong>dica variety (ZYQ8) and a typical japonica variety<br />
(JX17) were used as parents for cross<strong>in</strong>g. More than 150 pure<br />
DH l<strong>in</strong>es were obta<strong>in</strong>ed after anther culture of F 1 hybrids. Of<br />
these, 121 were selected for study<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
One hundred and twenty-four DH l<strong>in</strong>es were used. Dur<strong>in</strong>g<br />
the period of head<strong>in</strong>g, three plants of each DH l<strong>in</strong>e were<br />
selected to <strong>in</strong>vestigate their root vitality by us<strong>in</strong>g the TTC<br />
method. About 1 g of surface-layer root was immersed <strong>in</strong> a<br />
solution of 0.2% TTC, which was dissolved <strong>in</strong> 0.0335 mol<br />
L –1 PBS, then <strong>in</strong>cubated at 37 °C for 4 hours <strong>in</strong> the dark. One<br />
mol L –1 of sulfate acid was added to stop the reaction. The<br />
concentration of TTCH <strong>in</strong> extraction was measured accord<strong>in</strong>g<br />
to the absorbance at 485 nm measured by us<strong>in</strong>g a Backman<br />
DU-640 spectrophotometer. Root vitality was represented by<br />
the TTC quantity (mmol) reduced by 1 g of fresh root per hour<br />
(Zhang 1992). The maximum root length, total root length,<br />
root number, and root dry weight at the seedl<strong>in</strong>g stage were<br />
also <strong>in</strong>vestigated.<br />
Based on the constructed l<strong>in</strong>kage map of the DH population,<br />
<strong>in</strong>terval QTL mapp<strong>in</strong>g was used to analyze the QTLs<br />
for root vitality by us<strong>in</strong>g Mapmaker/QTL software. The presence<br />
of a QTL was determ<strong>in</strong>ed with a threshold LOD score of<br />
2.0. The variation and additive effect of each QTL for relative<br />
characters were also calculated.<br />
Results<br />
Analysis between root vitality and root growth traits such as<br />
maximum root length, total root length, root number, and root<br />
dry weight <strong>in</strong> the DH population was performed. There was<br />
no relationship between root vitality and every root growth<br />
trait. It was suggested that root vitality and root growth were<br />
controlled by different genes.<br />
Root vitality of <strong>in</strong>dica (ZYQ8) was 148.39 mmol TTC/<br />
(g FW h –1 ) and that of japonica (JX17) was 135.04 mmol TTC/<br />
(g FW h –1 ). The distribution of root vitality <strong>in</strong> 134 DH l<strong>in</strong>es<br />
was cont<strong>in</strong>uous, show<strong>in</strong>g that this characteristic was a quantitative<br />
genetic trait suitable for QTL mapp<strong>in</strong>g (Fig. 1).<br />
A rice RFLP l<strong>in</strong>kage map was constructed by us<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
DH population and 243 markers. Results of QTL detection of<br />
root vitality from 134 DH l<strong>in</strong>es appear <strong>in</strong> Table 1. One QTL,<br />
qRV-4, was detected between marker RG449 and RRF09_1<br />
on chromosome 4. Its LOD score and variation were 2.59 and<br />
10.4%, respectively. Its additive effect was from ZYQ8.<br />
Discussion<br />
Some QTLs for length, thickness, weight, and penetration ability<br />
of rice root have been identified (Price et al 1997, Yadav et<br />
al 1997). The activities of growth and physiology of rice root<br />
were at a maximum level <strong>in</strong> the head<strong>in</strong>g stage. From young<br />
<strong>in</strong>florescence to head<strong>in</strong>g, many surface-layer roots were produced.<br />
The QTL for root vitality identified <strong>in</strong> this study was<br />
between RG449 and RRF09_1 on chromosome 4. It was different<br />
from QTLs for root growth traits such as maximum<br />
length, total length, number, and dry weight of root (unpublished<br />
data). Several dozen QTLs for root growth characteristics<br />
had been identified. Among these QTLs, one QTL for<br />
penetration <strong>in</strong>dex and two QTLs for root number were located<br />
on chromosome 4 and l<strong>in</strong>ked with RG467C, RG214, and<br />
RG163, respectively (Ray et al 1996). These markers didn’t<br />
l<strong>in</strong>k tightly with qRV-4. It is suggested that the genes controll<strong>in</strong>g<br />
root vitality are different from the genes controll<strong>in</strong>g root<br />
growth.<br />
The genes for root vitality also affect ratoon<strong>in</strong>g ability<br />
by affect<strong>in</strong>g the level of cytok<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>. In this study, the QTL (qRV-<br />
4) for root vitality was identified on almost the same region of<br />
one of the QTLs for ratoon<strong>in</strong>g ability (Ra-4) identified by Tan<br />
et al (1997) us<strong>in</strong>g the same DH population. The QTL qRV-4<br />
340 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
No. of DH l<strong>in</strong>es<br />
30<br />
25<br />
20<br />
15<br />
10<br />
5<br />
0<br />
20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220<br />
Root vitality mg (TTC/(g FW h –1 )<br />
Fig. 1. Distribution of root vitality <strong>in</strong> the doubled-haploid (DH) population.<br />
Table 1. QTLs for root vitality.<br />
Locus Chromosome Marker <strong>in</strong>terval LOD score Variation(%) Additive effect<br />
qRV-4 4 RG449-RRF09_1 2.59 10.4 –1.6245<br />
also l<strong>in</strong>ked with the marker of one QTL for tiller number (Ray<br />
et al 1996). The l<strong>in</strong>kage of QTLs for root vitality and tiller<br />
number may be related to cytok<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>.<br />
References<br />
Price AH, Tomes AD, Virk DS. 1997. Genetic dissection of root<br />
growth <strong>in</strong> rice (Oryza sativa). II. Mapp<strong>in</strong>g quantitative trait<br />
loci us<strong>in</strong>g molecular markers. Theor. Appl. Genet 95:143-152.<br />
Qiu HB, Pan YC, Wang BB, Lu DZ. 1981. Study on leaf senescence<br />
and quantity of root exudate and the relation to gra<strong>in</strong> yield.<br />
Zhejiang Agric. Sci. 4:175-176.<br />
Ray JD, Yu L, McCouch SR, Hampoux MC, Wang G, Nguyen HT.<br />
1996. Mapp<strong>in</strong>g quantitative trait loci associated with root<br />
penetration ability <strong>in</strong> rice (Oryza sativa L.). Theor Appl Genet.,<br />
92:627-636.<br />
Tan ZB, Shen LS, Yuan ZL, Lu CF, Chen Y, Zhou KD, Zhu LH.<br />
1997. Identification of QTLs for ratoon<strong>in</strong>g ability and gra<strong>in</strong><br />
yield traits of rice and analysis of their genetic effects. Acta<br />
Agron. S<strong>in</strong>. 23(3):289-295.<br />
Yadav R, Courtois B, Huang N, McLaren G. 1997. Mapp<strong>in</strong>g genes<br />
controll<strong>in</strong>g root morphology and root distribution <strong>in</strong> a doubledhaploid<br />
population of rice. Theor. Appl. Genet. 94:619-632.<br />
Zhang XZ. 1992. Method for crop physiology. Beij<strong>in</strong>g (Ch<strong>in</strong>a):<br />
Agricultural Publish<strong>in</strong>g Company. p 136-143.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ addresses: Teng Sheng, Zheng Xianwu, and Zhu Lihuang,<br />
Institute of <strong>Genetics</strong>, Ch<strong>in</strong>ese Academy of Sciences, Beij<strong>in</strong>g<br />
100101; Teng Sheng, Zeng Dali, and Qian Qian, Ch<strong>in</strong>a National<br />
<strong>Rice</strong> Research Institute, Hangzhou 310006; K.<br />
Yasufumi, Japan <strong>International</strong> Research Center of Agricultural<br />
Science, Tsukuba 305-8686, Japan.<br />
Molecular markers, QTL mapp<strong>in</strong>g, and marker-assisted selection 341
Genomics<br />
Genomics 343
344 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
<strong>Rice</strong> functional genomics via cDNA microarray analysis<br />
J. Yazaki, N. Kishimoto, F. Fujii, K. Nakamura, J. Wu, K. Yamamoto, K. Sakata, T. Sasaki, and S. Kikuchi<br />
One of the major goals of the <strong>Rice</strong> Genome Research Program (RGP) is to understand the function and <strong>in</strong>terrelationships of<br />
different genes that compose the rice genome. We have embarked on a large-scale rice functional genomics program us<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
microarray system to obta<strong>in</strong> an expression profile of rice genes. About 9,000 partial cDNA sequences correspond<strong>in</strong>g to unique<br />
genes have been identified <strong>in</strong> the RGP. <strong>Rice</strong> microarrays have been constructed us<strong>in</strong>g 1,265 cDNA clones, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g 459<br />
sequences that correspond to genes of unknown function. Both the full-<strong>in</strong>sert and gene-specific portions of the cDNA clones<br />
were spotted on glass slides us<strong>in</strong>g a high-speed robotic arrayer. These were then used as probes to hybridize target RNAs<br />
prepared from different rice tissues such as the leaf, root, panicle, and callus. The results <strong>in</strong>dicate that gene-specific microarray<br />
could detect weaker but much more specific signals than full-<strong>in</strong>sert microarray. Some cDNA clones, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g several genes<br />
with unknown function, reproducibly showed differences <strong>in</strong> gene expression. These suggest the efficiency of us<strong>in</strong>g the microarray<br />
system to evaluate the expression profiles of known rice genes as well as to assign unknown genes to various metabolic<br />
pathways.<br />
The <strong>Rice</strong> Genome Research Program (RGP) has undertaken<br />
an extensive rice genome analysis s<strong>in</strong>ce its launch<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> 1991,<br />
which has resulted <strong>in</strong> the establishment of a catalog of rice<br />
genes, a high-density l<strong>in</strong>kage map, and YAC (yeast artificial<br />
chromosome)-based physical maps of the 12 rice chromosomes.<br />
A large collection of expressed sequence tags (ESTs)<br />
was produced from cDNA sequenc<strong>in</strong>g us<strong>in</strong>g cDNA libraries<br />
derived from rice calli cultured <strong>in</strong> different media and tissues<br />
such as the root, shoot, leaf, and panicle (Yamamoto and Sasaki<br />
1997). Approximately 9,000 partial cDNA sequences correspond<strong>in</strong>g<br />
to unique genes have been identified. Us<strong>in</strong>g these<br />
resources, we established the first rice cDNA microarray to<br />
facilitate gene expression profil<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> rice.<br />
Microarray is now widely recognized as an important<br />
technology for functional genomics. The use of microarray for<br />
gene expression monitor<strong>in</strong>g is more effective than other methods<br />
such as Northern hybridization and reverse transcriptase<br />
and polymerase cha<strong>in</strong> reaction (PCR). This technology facilitates<br />
high-throughput expression analysis of the large number<br />
of genes that compose the genome. We report on the rice cDNA<br />
microarray system for gene expression monitor<strong>in</strong>g and some<br />
studies on reproducibility and detection l<strong>in</strong>earity, the comparison<br />
of full-length and 3′-UTR probes, and expression profiles<br />
between different tissues.<br />
Construction of a rice microarray<br />
Figure 1 shows the schema for gene expression profil<strong>in</strong>g us<strong>in</strong>g<br />
cDNA microarray. All cDNA clones were produced by largescale<br />
cDNA analysis <strong>in</strong> the RGP. A homology search was performed<br />
by BLASTN and clones with high similarity were clustered.<br />
The clustered clones were analyzed for sequence similarity<br />
aga<strong>in</strong>st prote<strong>in</strong> and nucleic acid public databases. A homology<br />
search was then performed by BLASTN and BLASTX,<br />
and about 9,000 unique clones with high similarity were identified<br />
putatively. A total of 1,265 <strong>in</strong>dependent clones were selected<br />
randomly. Approximately two-thirds of the clones (806)<br />
have annotations, whereas the rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g 459 clones have no<br />
homology to any cod<strong>in</strong>g sequences available <strong>in</strong> public databases.<br />
The full-<strong>in</strong>sert cDNA clones were amplified by PCR<br />
us<strong>in</strong>g M13 as a primer; M4 and RV were complementary to<br />
the vector sequences flank<strong>in</strong>g both sides of the cDNA <strong>in</strong>sert.<br />
The 3′-UTR cDNA clones were amplified by PCR us<strong>in</strong>g specific<br />
primers complementary to specific regions of each cDNA<br />
clone. The PCR products were purified to remove unwanted<br />
salts, detergent, primers, and other impurities present <strong>in</strong> the<br />
reaction mixture. The purified PCR products were mixed with<br />
DMSO for microarray construction. In general, the total quantity<br />
of each PCR product was greater than 1 µg. The average<br />
size of full-<strong>in</strong>sert and 3′-UTR cDNA clones was about 1,000<br />
and 200 bp, respectively. A total of 1,265 cDNA probes were<br />
spotted <strong>in</strong> duplicate on an alum<strong>in</strong>um-coated and DMSO-optimized<br />
glass slide (1″ × 3″) us<strong>in</strong>g an Array Spotter Generation<br />
III (Amersham Pharmacia, Tokyo, Japan). After spott<strong>in</strong>g, the<br />
slides were dried for about 1 h and exposed to UV for crossl<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
Target preparation, hybridization, and image analysis<br />
Japonica rice cultivar Nipponbare was used for RNA extraction<br />
and target preparation. Leaf and root tissues were collected<br />
from laboratory-cultured plants at 30 days after germ<strong>in</strong>ation.<br />
Flower buds were gathered at the onset of flower<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
Growth-phase calli were <strong>in</strong>duced <strong>in</strong> medium with 2,4-<br />
dichlorophenoxy acetic acid at 25 °C and collected after 20 d<br />
of culture. Each poly (A)+RNA derived from these tissues was<br />
labeled by a reverse transcriptase reaction with fluorescent dye.<br />
Two fluorescent dyes, Cy3 and Cy5, are usually used <strong>in</strong><br />
microarray experiments because the use of two targets <strong>in</strong> one<br />
hybridization is thought to reduce probable errors encountered<br />
dur<strong>in</strong>g hybridization, and this presumably makes the hybridization<br />
experiment and comparison of expression profiles between<br />
different target samples easier. However, the fluorescent<br />
levels of Cy3 and Cy5 dyes after scann<strong>in</strong>g are actually<br />
different. For the alum<strong>in</strong>um-coated glass slide, the Cy5 signal<br />
Genomics 345
Microarray preparation<br />
RGP cDNA catalogue<br />
Classification us<strong>in</strong>g 3′-UTR<br />
Target sample preparation<br />
DNA preparation<br />
Automated system for DNA handl<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Oryza sativa subsp. japonica cv.<br />
Nipponbare<br />
Spott<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Root, leaf, flower, and callus<br />
Total RNA extraction<br />
mRNA purification<br />
Label<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Mirror-type glass<br />
Array spotter<br />
Hybridization<br />
Image analysis<br />
Array scanner<br />
Image Quant<br />
Array Vision<br />
Fig. 1. Schema of the microarray experiment. A total of 1,265 <strong>in</strong>dependent clones were selected randomly from the RGP expressed<br />
sequence tag catalogue. cDNA preparation was carried out us<strong>in</strong>g an automated system, Genesis workstation (TECAN Co. Ltd.) with a robot<br />
arm, clone selection, plasmid extraction, polymerase cha<strong>in</strong> reaction (PCR) amplification, and adjust<strong>in</strong>g DNA concentration. The purified<br />
PCR products were mixed with DMSO for microarray construction. The cDNA probes were spotted <strong>in</strong> duplicate on mirror-type glass slides<br />
(alum<strong>in</strong>um-coated and DMSO-optimized) us<strong>in</strong>g an Array Spotter. After spott<strong>in</strong>g, the glass slides were dried and cross-l<strong>in</strong>ked under UV<br />
conditions. Japonica rice cultivar Nipponbare was used for total RNA extraction. Poly (A)+RNA was purified us<strong>in</strong>g Oligotex-dT super<br />
(Takara, Shiga, Japan). Each target sample was reverse-transcribed us<strong>in</strong>g Super Script II reverse transcriptase for fluorescent label<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
The hybridized and washed microarrays were scanned us<strong>in</strong>g an Array Scanner. Computer software Image Quant and Array Vision was used<br />
to locate and del<strong>in</strong>eate every spot <strong>in</strong> the array and to <strong>in</strong>tegrate spot <strong>in</strong>tensities and volumes for each <strong>in</strong>dividual spot.<br />
346 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
Fluorescent signal <strong>in</strong>tensity of expeiment 2<br />
1.0E+07<br />
1.0E+06<br />
1.0E+05<br />
1.0E+04<br />
1.0E+03<br />
1.0E+03 1.0E+04 1.0E+05 1.0E+06 1.0E+07<br />
Fluorescent signal <strong>in</strong>tensity of expeiment 2<br />
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○<br />
Fig. 2. Reproducibility of the hybridization<br />
signal was analyzed and compared<br />
by scatter plott<strong>in</strong>g us<strong>in</strong>g 1,265<br />
cDNA clones <strong>in</strong> duplicate. Target<br />
poly(A)+RNA was prepared from rice<br />
root tissue as described <strong>in</strong> the experimental<br />
procedure. The sample<br />
poly(A)+RNA mixture was reversetranscribed<br />
<strong>in</strong> the presense of Cy5<br />
dCTP. Twofold changes are <strong>in</strong>dicated<br />
by the broken l<strong>in</strong>e. Threefold changes<br />
are <strong>in</strong>dicated by the dotted l<strong>in</strong>e. The<br />
l<strong>in</strong>e with Y (exp. 2) = X (exp. 1) shows<br />
an equally expressed transcript.<br />
is enhanced so that the level of the Cy3 signal is significantly<br />
lower than that of Cy5. Adjust<strong>in</strong>g both signals seems difficult<br />
and, for this reason, compar<strong>in</strong>g more than three target pieces<br />
of data is also difficult. We thus prefer to use the s<strong>in</strong>gle-target<br />
system. Normally, we label the target RNA with Cy5-dCTP.<br />
The control cRNAs were synthesized by <strong>in</strong> vitro transcription<br />
from the mouse platelet-derived growth factor receptor gene.<br />
Fluorescence-labeled targets were hybridized to cDNA<br />
microarray glass slides for 16 h. After hybridization, the glass<br />
slides were washed and air-dried us<strong>in</strong>g an air duster <strong>in</strong> a dustfree<br />
environment. Then, the microarrays were scanned us<strong>in</strong>g<br />
an Array Scanner Generation III (Molecular Dynamics). The<br />
software Array Vision from Imag<strong>in</strong>g Research was used to locate<br />
and del<strong>in</strong>eate every spot <strong>in</strong> the array and to <strong>in</strong>tegrate spot<br />
<strong>in</strong>tensities and volumes for each <strong>in</strong>dividual spot.<br />
Reproducibility<br />
The duplicated spots <strong>in</strong> the cDNA microarray were compared<br />
to determ<strong>in</strong>e the extent of reproducibility. More than 90% of<br />
the clones were dispersed with<strong>in</strong> a two- to threefold expression<br />
value when the duplicated spots (experiments 1 and 2)<br />
were hybridized with one target at one-time hybridization (Figure<br />
2). Abundantly expressed genes (more than 1 × 10 6 , fluorescent<br />
signal <strong>in</strong>tensity) could easily fit with<strong>in</strong> this range. However,<br />
less-abundant genes showed wide variation. Thus, it is<br />
important to enlarge the reliability zone of gene expression.<br />
One solution is to determ<strong>in</strong>e which gene is abundantly expressed<br />
and which one is less abundant after repeated experiments.<br />
Less-abundant gene probes must be gathered <strong>in</strong> one<br />
array and hybridized with a much higher amount of the target<br />
RNA. Some factors that may affect the reproducibility of<br />
microarray data are spott<strong>in</strong>g variability, DNA retention failure,<br />
target RNA quality, over- or underestimation of target RNA<br />
volumes, uneven label<strong>in</strong>g, hybridization, wash<strong>in</strong>g procedures,<br />
and quantification of hybridization data. To obta<strong>in</strong> good and<br />
reliable data, these experimental errors should be avoided and<br />
repeated experiments may be necessary.<br />
Detection sensitivity of transcript concentration<br />
The <strong>in</strong> vitro transcript of detection sensitivity was measured<br />
by us<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>ternal control clone (mouse platelet-derived<br />
growth factor receptor, 900 bp) that showed no cross-hybridization<br />
with the rice genes. The control cRNA (1 ng, 0.5 ng,<br />
0.1 ng, and 50 pg) was added to 1 µg of sample mRNA, result<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>in</strong> control cRNA to sample mRNA ratios of 100:100,000,<br />
50:100,000, 10:100,000, and 5:100,000. The control cRNA<br />
and sample mRNA mixtures were reverse-transcribed <strong>in</strong> the<br />
presence of Cy5 dCTP <strong>in</strong>to the first cDNA strand and hybridized<br />
to complementary DNA elements on the microarray. Us<strong>in</strong>g<br />
the control clone, we could detect from 1 ng (1/1,000 of<br />
rice target RNA) to 50 pg of expression volume (data not<br />
shown). However, at a concentration below 0.05 ng, the control<br />
cRNA showed a lower signal than the background control<br />
(element without spotted DNA) signal. The average background<br />
fluorescent signal <strong>in</strong>tensity was 1.3 × 10 5 .<br />
Full-<strong>in</strong>sert and 3′-UTR probes<br />
EST mapp<strong>in</strong>g analysis <strong>in</strong> the RGP revealed that, when the 5′<br />
portion of the ESTs was used as a probe, many ESTs were<br />
assigned to multiple YAC clones. Alternatively, when the 3′<br />
portion (3′-UTR region) was used as a probe, most ESTs were<br />
detected <strong>in</strong> the specific regions of the YAC clones (Wu et al<br />
2000). As we have already made PCR primers for the 3′-UTR<br />
region of the EST clones, two probe systems from the fulllength<br />
<strong>in</strong>serts and the 3′-UTR were constructed. Us<strong>in</strong>g both<br />
probes, microarrays were compared us<strong>in</strong>g mRNAs from root<br />
tissues at 30 d follow<strong>in</strong>g germ<strong>in</strong>ation (Table 1). In the full<strong>in</strong>sert<br />
microarray, the 10 most abundant clones consist of five<br />
Genomics 347
Table 1. Comparison of gene expression profiles <strong>in</strong> rice root us<strong>in</strong>g full-<strong>in</strong>sert and 3′-UTR microarray.<br />
Clone ID Accession Putative gene identification Signal <strong>in</strong>tensity<br />
Full-<strong>in</strong>sert<br />
C52727 C97167 Ubiquit<strong>in</strong> (Avena fatua) 1.84E+07<br />
S16157 AU065955 S. adenosyl methion<strong>in</strong>e synthetase (Lycopersicon esculentum) 1.47E+07<br />
C01912 D15997 NADH dehydrogenase (Paramecium tetraurelia) 1.33E+07<br />
S16102 C24892 Ubiquit<strong>in</strong> extension prote<strong>in</strong> (Lup<strong>in</strong>us albus) 1.30E+07<br />
E02210 C72769 Act<strong>in</strong> (Nicotiana tabacum) 1.16E+07<br />
C03001 C98384 Polyubiquit<strong>in</strong> (Arabidopsis thaliana) 1.08E+07<br />
C00176 C97944 Ubiquit<strong>in</strong> (Oryza sativa) 1.05E+07<br />
C52245 C27568 Ubiqiut<strong>in</strong> (Gallus gallus) 9.40E+06<br />
S16144 AU032905 9.37E+06<br />
C40015 AU077483 9.32E+06<br />
3′UTR<br />
C00176 C97944 Ubiquit<strong>in</strong> (O. sativa) 2.08E+07<br />
C52727 C97167 Ubiquit<strong>in</strong> (A. fatua) 1.01E+07<br />
S16102 C24892 Ubiquit<strong>in</strong> extension prote<strong>in</strong> (L. albus) 8.38E+06<br />
S16144 AU032905 3.23E+06<br />
C40015 AU077483 3.10E+06<br />
E03596 AU064058 Thioredox<strong>in</strong> M (Zea mays) 2.87E+06<br />
C12875 AU068273 2.83E+06<br />
S04953 D41931 ZB8, phenylalam<strong>in</strong>e ammonia-lyase (O. sativa) 2.57E+06<br />
E02880 C73083 α-methyltransferase (Z. mays) 2.09E+06<br />
S10563 AU032465 1.90E+06<br />
Clone ID: the orig<strong>in</strong>al clone identification number of the sequence submitted to DDBJ. Putative gene identification: gene annotation<br />
obta<strong>in</strong>ed for sequences that resulted from a homology search <strong>in</strong> the public database. The gene with the highest score was used as the<br />
putative gene identification for the sequence. The organism <strong>in</strong> which the gene was identified is <strong>in</strong>dicated <strong>in</strong> parentheses. Signal <strong>in</strong>tensity:<br />
the abundance of transcripts from the target sample was reflected by signal <strong>in</strong>tensity.<br />
ubiquit<strong>in</strong> homologs (clone ID C52727, S16102, C03001,<br />
C00176, and C52245), two unknown genes (S16144 and<br />
C40015), and one homolog each of S-adenosyl methion<strong>in</strong>e<br />
synthase (S16157), NADH dehydrogenase (C01912), and act<strong>in</strong><br />
(E02210). In the 3′-UTR microarray, three ubiquit<strong>in</strong> homologs<br />
(C00176, C52727, and S16102), four unknown genes<br />
(S16144, C40015, C12875, and S10563), and one homolog<br />
each of thioredox<strong>in</strong> (E03596), phenylalan<strong>in</strong>e ammonia-lyase<br />
(S04593), and methyltransferase (E02880) were highly expressed.<br />
Only three ubiquit<strong>in</strong> homologs (C00176, C52727, and<br />
S16102) and two unknown genes (S16144, C40015), however,<br />
were highly expressed <strong>in</strong> both full-<strong>in</strong>sert and 3′-UTR<br />
microarrays. These highly abundant genes can be classified as<br />
root-specific genes. The rest, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g two ubiquit<strong>in</strong> homologs<br />
(C03001 and C52245), were selected by the 5′-portion of the<br />
full-<strong>in</strong>sert probes and are probably nonspecific genes <strong>in</strong> the<br />
root. Furthermore, the total fluorescent <strong>in</strong>tensity of the full<strong>in</strong>sert<br />
and 3′-UTR microarrays was about 180 × 10 7 and 4.5 ×<br />
10 7 , respectively. A high fluorescent signal <strong>in</strong> the full-<strong>in</strong>sert<br />
microarray can be attributed to hybridization, not only of the<br />
labeled target but also of other regions of the full <strong>in</strong>sert. Furthermore,<br />
the results suggest that the full-length cDNA<br />
microarray is effective for the comprehensive analysis of the<br />
family gene expression, whereas the 3′-UTR microarray is<br />
useful for detect<strong>in</strong>g gene-specific expression.<br />
Expression profiles between different tissues<br />
The full-<strong>in</strong>sert cDNA microarray was evaluated for sensitivity<br />
of gene expression <strong>in</strong> different tissues such as the leaf, root,<br />
panicle, and callus. Poly (A)+RNA samples were labeled with<br />
Cy5-dCTP and hybridized to the 1,265 full-<strong>in</strong>sert cDNA<br />
microarray. We compared the signal <strong>in</strong>tensity of hybridization<br />
with the scatter plot of expression profiles. Data were normalized<br />
by gett<strong>in</strong>g the total fluorescent signal of each target DNA<br />
and adjust<strong>in</strong>g the value to obta<strong>in</strong> equal signals. Figure 3 shows<br />
the scatter plot and the 10 most differentially expressed genes<br />
<strong>in</strong> the panicle and callus.<br />
S<strong>in</strong>ce the scatter-plot data showed that gene expression<br />
profil<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> panicle and callus tissues differs, there was a low<br />
correlation between the panicle and callus. Many genes did<br />
not fit with<strong>in</strong> the two- to threefold expression level. Several<br />
genes that showed absolute tissue specificity were identified.<br />
A comparison of expressed genes <strong>in</strong> the panicle and callus<br />
showed that the major allergen homolog Cynod1 and the pollen<br />
allergen PhlpII homolog were highly abundant and expressed<br />
more than 2,000-fold <strong>in</strong> the panicle. The calcium-b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g<br />
pollen allergen gene was also expressed more than 200-<br />
fold <strong>in</strong> the panicle. These genes were detected as panicle-absolute<br />
and panicle-specific genes. The other three genes corresponded<br />
to the cDNA library derived from the flower<strong>in</strong>gstage<br />
panicle and the rest (C52093, S04987, S11020, and<br />
S16157) corresponded to callus and shoot cDNA libraries. For<br />
the callus, these results may be attributed to their totipotent<br />
348 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
Flourescent signal <strong>in</strong>tensity of panicles<br />
1E+11<br />
1E+10<br />
1E+09<br />
1E+08<br />
1E+07<br />
1E+06<br />
1E+05<br />
1E+04<br />
1E+05 1E+06 1E+07 1E+08 1E+09<br />
Flourescent signal <strong>in</strong>tensity of calli<br />
Fig. 3. Differential expression profile was analyzed and compared<br />
by scatter plott<strong>in</strong>g us<strong>in</strong>g 1,265 cDNA clones. Target poly(A)+RNA<br />
was prepared from rice panicles and calli. The sample poly(A)+RNA<br />
mixture was reverse-transcribed <strong>in</strong> the presence of Cy5 dCTP. Twofold<br />
changes are <strong>in</strong>dicated by the wide dotted l<strong>in</strong>e. Threefold<br />
changes are <strong>in</strong>dicated by the narrow dotted l<strong>in</strong>e. The l<strong>in</strong>e with Y<br />
(exp. 2) = X (exp. 1) shows an equally expressed transcript.<br />
nature so that various tissue-specific genes were possibly expressed.<br />
A similar scatter plot was obta<strong>in</strong>ed for the leaf and<br />
root (data not shown) and several genes that showed absolute<br />
tissue specificity were also identified <strong>in</strong> the leaf. Homologs of<br />
leaf-specific genes such as chlorophyll a/b b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g prote<strong>in</strong>,<br />
photosystem I antenna prote<strong>in</strong>, Xa21 prote<strong>in</strong> k<strong>in</strong>ase, and photosystem<br />
II oxygen-<strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g complex prote<strong>in</strong> showed differential<br />
expression <strong>in</strong> the leaf. Except for cytochrome P-450,<br />
the other highly expressed genes <strong>in</strong> the leaf corresponded to<br />
shoot cDNAs.<br />
The results demonstrate that microarray technology is<br />
effective for analyz<strong>in</strong>g massive gene expression and elucidation<br />
of gene function. Although microarrays can only provide<br />
<strong>in</strong>formation on the probed (arrayed) clones, this technique will<br />
play an important role <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>itial screen<strong>in</strong>g of genes with<br />
specific expression patterns and can be applied to other biological<br />
research to which molecular biological technology is<br />
difficult to apply.<br />
Future prospects<br />
We are now prepar<strong>in</strong>g a rice EST microarray with about 10,000<br />
<strong>in</strong>dependent clones from the RGP EST collection. However,<br />
further cDNA clon<strong>in</strong>g and structural analysis are needed to<br />
cover all the express<strong>in</strong>g genes. For this purpose, the rice fulllength<br />
cDNA project was launched <strong>in</strong> early 2000. This project<br />
will be useful <strong>in</strong> establish<strong>in</strong>g a more comprehensive rice cDNA<br />
microarray cover<strong>in</strong>g the entire rice genome. It can thus be an<br />
effective method for monitor<strong>in</strong>g gene expression profiles at<br />
various stages of growth and differentiation and as a response<br />
to various stress conditions. The microarray will be used to<br />
establish a system for functional analysis <strong>in</strong> rice, such as the<br />
efficient selection of target genes and construction of gene<br />
networks. The accumulation of cDNA microarray data will<br />
also require an efficient database system to <strong>in</strong>tegrate all <strong>in</strong>formation<br />
as <strong>in</strong>dividual entities and as part of the whole genome.<br />
These advances <strong>in</strong> functional genomics will greatly accelerate<br />
the many processes associated with rice improvement.<br />
References<br />
Wu J, Yamamoto S, Maehara T, Harada C, Shimokawa T, Ono N,<br />
Mukai Y, Takazaki Y, Yazaki J, Koike K, Shomura A, Fujii F,<br />
Yano M, Ando T, Kono I, Sasaki T, Matsumoto T. 2000. A<br />
comprehensive map of rice expressed sequence tags (ESTs):<br />
its characteristics and application to genome analysis. Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs<br />
of the 6th <strong>International</strong> Congress of Plant Molecular<br />
Biology.<br />
Yamamoto K, Sasaki T. 1997. Large-scale EST sequenc<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> rice.<br />
Plant Mol. Biol. 35:135-144.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ address: <strong>Rice</strong> Genome Research Program, National Institute<br />
of Agrobiological Resources/Institute of the Society for<br />
Techno-<strong>in</strong>novation of Agriculture, Forestry, and Fisheries,<br />
Tsukuba 305-0854, Japan.<br />
Acknowledgments: We thank Kohei Suzuki, Hideaki Suzuki (STAFF-<br />
Institute), and Takumi Koyama (National Institute of Animal<br />
Health) for provid<strong>in</strong>g the animal cDNA clones; Hideki<br />
Nagasaki, Yoshiyuki Mukai, and Kazunori Waki (STAFF-Institute)<br />
for technical assistance and many useful suggestions;<br />
and Bal Antonio (STAFF-Institute) for helpful discussions and<br />
critical read<strong>in</strong>g of the manuscript. This work was supported<br />
by a grant from the M<strong>in</strong>istry of Agriculture, Forestry, and Fisheries<br />
of Japan (<strong>Rice</strong> Genome Project MA-1001).<br />
Genomics 349
Develop<strong>in</strong>g genomics approaches<br />
for crop trait improvement<br />
H. Sakai, G. Taram<strong>in</strong>o, N. Nagasawa, Guo-Hua Miao, J. Vogel, and S. T<strong>in</strong>gey<br />
The advent of high-throughput sequenc<strong>in</strong>g capability has changed the paradigm of agricultural sciences <strong>in</strong> recent years. Genes<br />
encoded by genomes are easily discovered <strong>in</strong> the form of expressed sequence tags (ESTs), and bio<strong>in</strong>formatic tools help predict<br />
their functions. The development of mRNA profil<strong>in</strong>g tools enables us to visualize the regulation of gene expression at the<br />
genome level. We used these genomics approaches to identify genes that help improve traits of crops, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g rice. In<br />
conjunction with such genome-wide reverse genetics approaches, systematic forward genetics approaches will further help<br />
elucidate biological pathways that <strong>in</strong>volve complex gene <strong>in</strong>teractions.<br />
Dur<strong>in</strong>g the last several years, technologies <strong>in</strong> the genomics<br />
area have developed rapidly, now enabl<strong>in</strong>g us to obta<strong>in</strong> data<br />
encompass<strong>in</strong>g entire gene activities. New technologies have<br />
changed our way of approach<strong>in</strong>g problems to understand biological<br />
systems. The complexity of cellular activities at various<br />
life stages can now be viewed more precisely on gene expression<br />
patterns (Schena et al 1995). A genetic variation or<br />
trait, which was recognized by its visible effect <strong>in</strong> classical<br />
genetic analyses, can be characterized by its effect on spatial<br />
and temporal cascades of genetic <strong>in</strong>teractions. The genomics<br />
technologies, which were assigned first to a small number of<br />
species, are <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly applied to various organisms, many<br />
of which have economic importance.<br />
The importance of genomics technologies is be<strong>in</strong>g realized<br />
through various ways (see Fig. 1). One manifest advantage<br />
of genomics approaches is <strong>in</strong> rapid gene discovery and<br />
<strong>in</strong>tegral reverse genetics. Start<strong>in</strong>g from the complete <strong>in</strong>ventory<br />
of genes encoded by the genome, genes <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> pathways<br />
of <strong>in</strong>terest are selected by their expression patterns without<br />
know<strong>in</strong>g their functions. The complete <strong>in</strong>ventory of genes<br />
is achieved by whole-genome sequenc<strong>in</strong>g and/or extensive<br />
cDNA (expressed sequence tag, EST) sequenc<strong>in</strong>g. The latter<br />
method especially allows the relatively rapid identification of<br />
genes expressed <strong>in</strong> certa<strong>in</strong> tissues or <strong>in</strong> certa<strong>in</strong> biological responses.<br />
A disadvantage of the EST sequenc<strong>in</strong>g approach is<br />
the redundancy of mRNA molecules, which often give large<br />
differences <strong>in</strong> expression levels. However, improved normalization<br />
methods of cDNA libraries, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g the new Lynx<br />
bead-clon<strong>in</strong>g technology (Brenner et al 2000a,b), have enabled<br />
us to sample a nearly complete set of expressed genes from<br />
crop species, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g rice. Gene expression patterns are further<br />
analyzed <strong>in</strong> a highly parallel way by us<strong>in</strong>g technologies<br />
such as microarrays (Schena et al 1995). These tools are helpful<br />
<strong>in</strong> identify<strong>in</strong>g a small group of candidate genes out of thousands<br />
of genes. The function of candidate genes is validated<br />
by analyz<strong>in</strong>g antisense or overexpression transgenic plants or<br />
plants carry<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>sertional mutations, which are identified from<br />
mutant pools by a “gene mach<strong>in</strong>e” approach (Azpiroz-Leehan<br />
and Feldmann 1997).<br />
The second patent advantage of genomics technologies<br />
is their efficacy <strong>in</strong> improv<strong>in</strong>g forward genetics approaches.<br />
Forward genetics, often called classical genetics, starts from<br />
the isolation of mutants or variants with def<strong>in</strong>ed lesions or traits.<br />
The ability to characterize their genetic differences is crucial<br />
to dist<strong>in</strong>guish<strong>in</strong>g unique pathways affected by mutations. To<br />
this extent, genomics tools such as mRNA profil<strong>in</strong>g give a new<br />
dimension to mutant phenotyp<strong>in</strong>g, look<strong>in</strong>g at the global effect<br />
of loss- or ga<strong>in</strong>-of-function of genes. Seem<strong>in</strong>gly similar phenotypes<br />
could be differentiated from each other by look<strong>in</strong>g at<br />
the expression patterns of downstream genes. One example is<br />
disease resistance. Several rice cultivars show resistance to<br />
fungal as well as bacterial <strong>in</strong>fections by <strong>in</strong>duc<strong>in</strong>g common<br />
hypersensitive-response reactions lead<strong>in</strong>g to local programmed<br />
cell death. The difference <strong>in</strong> resistance phenotypes, however,<br />
can be comprehended by a global change <strong>in</strong> the expression of<br />
disease-response-related genes (see Fig. 2).<br />
The third advantageous area of application of genomics<br />
approaches is molecular breed<strong>in</strong>g. When the detailed physical<br />
structure of a given genome is available as contiguous DNA<br />
Physical<br />
maps<br />
Reverse<br />
genetics<br />
Genes<br />
Genome<br />
sequence<br />
ESTs<br />
mRNA profil<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Proteomics<br />
Mutants/variants<br />
Functions<br />
Markers<br />
Molecular<br />
breed<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Fig. 1. Framework of genomics technologies.<br />
350 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
all ORFs (no classification chosen)<br />
7.5<br />
4.0<br />
E<br />
x<br />
p<br />
r<br />
e<br />
s<br />
s<br />
i<br />
o<br />
n<br />
2.5<br />
2.0<br />
1.5<br />
1.2<br />
1.0<br />
0.8<br />
0.7<br />
0.6<br />
0.5<br />
0.4<br />
0.3<br />
0.2<br />
Trust<br />
00<br />
Relative<br />
<strong>in</strong>tensity<br />
rice 184-429 0-72hr f<strong>in</strong>ale1<br />
Selected: rlr12.pk0001.h9<br />
7.5<br />
4.0<br />
4.0<br />
3.0<br />
2.0<br />
1.0<br />
E<br />
x<br />
p<br />
r<br />
e<br />
s<br />
s<br />
i<br />
o<br />
n<br />
2.5<br />
2.0<br />
1.5<br />
1.2<br />
1.0<br />
0.8<br />
0.7<br />
0.6<br />
0.5<br />
0.4<br />
0.0<br />
0.0 24.0 48.0 72.0 8.0 24.0 48.0<br />
184 429<br />
Time (h)<br />
Fig. 2. An example of gene expression analysis. More than 1,500 rice genes identified from EST sequenc<strong>in</strong>g<br />
were prepared for mak<strong>in</strong>g a microarray. The array was hybridized with probes obta<strong>in</strong>ed from rice leaves sampled<br />
after 0, 4, 8, 24, 48, and 72 h of <strong>in</strong>fection with compatible (184) and <strong>in</strong>compatible (429) stra<strong>in</strong>s of Magnaporthe<br />
grisea. (A) A view of gene expression patterns. Each small square represents the expression pattern of one<br />
gene at six different time po<strong>in</strong>ts. Expression levels are coded by colors. Data were processed us<strong>in</strong>g GeneSpr<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
(B) Subset of genes show<strong>in</strong>g a significant <strong>in</strong>duction of gene expression <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>compatible l<strong>in</strong>e after 8 h. Each<br />
l<strong>in</strong>e shows the expression pattern of one gene; 37 genes are blotted on these graphs. Data collected from<br />
microarray <strong>in</strong>tensities were analyzed us<strong>in</strong>g GeneSpr<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
72.0<br />
Trust<br />
0.3<br />
0.2<br />
0.0<br />
Genomics 351
sequences or clones, mapp<strong>in</strong>g of genetically def<strong>in</strong>ed loci, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g<br />
QTLs, is achievable at the nucleotide level, which<br />
eventually leads to the direct identification of correspond<strong>in</strong>g<br />
genes. This f<strong>in</strong>e-mapp<strong>in</strong>g capability also eases the breed<strong>in</strong>g<br />
process tremendously through the availability of the best molecular<br />
markers.<br />
Although genomics technologies facilitate <strong>in</strong>-depth studies<br />
of each crop species and aid accelerated breed<strong>in</strong>g processes,<br />
they also help us elucidate the molecular nature of natural variations<br />
between species. Before the genomics era, such<br />
<strong>in</strong>terspecies studies were often depicted as not feasible, or not<br />
possible. However, we now possess tools that allow global<br />
gene m<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g and expression studies, and which enable us to<br />
understand natural variations <strong>in</strong> the form of genes and gene<br />
regulation. By acquir<strong>in</strong>g this knowledge, traits from one species<br />
can be reproduced <strong>in</strong> a distant species. One such example<br />
is the production of epoxy fatty acid <strong>in</strong> seed (U.S. Patent 1999).<br />
This exotic fatty acid is synthesized <strong>in</strong> only a few plants but<br />
not <strong>in</strong> any crop species. The gene responsible for produc<strong>in</strong>g<br />
the fatty acid was identified by deep EST sampl<strong>in</strong>g of cDNA<br />
libraries made from the tissue of ironweed and bio<strong>in</strong>formaticbased<br />
gene-m<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g methods. By transform<strong>in</strong>g the gene, we can<br />
now alter crops to produce the <strong>in</strong>dustrially valuable fatty acid.<br />
Genomics technologies thus make it possible to exploit natural<br />
resources for breed<strong>in</strong>g purposes and to atta<strong>in</strong> new traits,<br />
which cannot be produced by conventional breed<strong>in</strong>g, but only<br />
by a long evolutionary process.<br />
References<br />
Azpiroz-Leehan R, Feldmann KA. 1997. T-DNA <strong>in</strong>sertion mutagenesis<br />
<strong>in</strong> Arabidopsis: go<strong>in</strong>g back and forth. Trends Genet.<br />
13:152-156.<br />
Brenner S, Johnson M, Bridgham J, Golda G, Lloyd DH, Johnson<br />
D, Luo S, McCurdy S, Foy M, Ewan M, Roth R, George D,<br />
Eletr S, Albrecht G, Vermaas E, Williams SR, Moon K,<br />
Burcham T, Pallas M, DuBridge RB, Kirchner J, Fearon K,<br />
Mao Ji, Corcoran K. 2000a. Gene expression analysis by massively<br />
parallel signature sequenc<strong>in</strong>g (MPSS) on microbead<br />
arrays. Nat. Biotechnol. 18:630-634.<br />
Brenner S, Williams SR, Vermaas EH, Storck T, Moon K, McCollum<br />
C, Mao JI, Luo S, Kirchner JJ, Eletr S, DuBridge RB, Burcham<br />
T, Albrecht G. 2000b. In vitro clon<strong>in</strong>g of complex mixtures of<br />
DNA on microbeads: physical separation of differentially expressed<br />
cDNAs. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97:1665-1670.<br />
Schena M, Shalon D, Davis RW, Brown PO. 1995. Quantitative<br />
monitor<strong>in</strong>g of gene expression patterns with a complementary<br />
DNA microarray. Science 270:467-470.<br />
United States Patent 5,846,784, Hitz WD, 18 Feb. 1999. Fatty acid<br />
modify<strong>in</strong>g enzymes from develop<strong>in</strong>g seeds of Vernonia<br />
galamenenisis.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ address: DuPont Agricultural Biotechnology, Genomics,<br />
Delaware Technology Park 200, 1 Innovation Way, Newark,<br />
DE 19714-6104, USA.<br />
A gene mach<strong>in</strong>e for rice<br />
N.M. Upadhyaya, X.-R. Zhou, Q.-H. Zhu, A. Eamens, K. Ramm, L. Wu, R. Sivakumar, S. Kumar, K.K. Narayanan, G. Thomas, T. Kato, D.-W. Yun,<br />
W.J. Peacock, and E.S. Dennis<br />
Insertional mutants will have a crucial role <strong>in</strong> identify<strong>in</strong>g the function of each of the expected 25,000–40,000 plant genes. We<br />
are us<strong>in</strong>g the two-component Ac/Ds transposon gene or enhancer trap system, <strong>in</strong>itially delivered through T-DNA, to produce<br />
libraries of <strong>in</strong>sertional mutants <strong>in</strong> rice. Large numbers of Ac or Ds (enhancer or gene trap) transgenic l<strong>in</strong>es have been produced.<br />
Mutagenic populations conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g Ac and Ds were produced by cross<strong>in</strong>g, cotransformation, or super transformation. In the first<br />
screen<strong>in</strong>g population, 4.6% of the plants were putative stable Ds trap l<strong>in</strong>es (unl<strong>in</strong>ked to Ac), with 40% conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g Ds elements<br />
unl<strong>in</strong>ked to Ds donor sites. The regions flank<strong>in</strong>g the orig<strong>in</strong>al Ds launch<strong>in</strong>g pad (T-DNA tag) and Ds transpositions are be<strong>in</strong>g<br />
sequenced. Among 12 T-DNA tags rescued, 5 were <strong>in</strong>serted <strong>in</strong>to known sequences. Among 84 Ds tags, 13 were transposed<br />
<strong>in</strong>to known sequences, 52 <strong>in</strong>to unknown sequences, and the other 19 <strong>in</strong> and around the orig<strong>in</strong>al Ds launch<strong>in</strong>g pad. New<br />
constructs with bar as a strong selectable marker for Ds itself and for Ds excision as well as a negative selector (tms2) for Ac<br />
have been developed for high-throughput screen<strong>in</strong>g. Our aim is to build a substantial “gene mach<strong>in</strong>e.” A labnote-cum-relational<br />
database, a tagged sequence database, and a Web site have been set up for efficient handl<strong>in</strong>g, process<strong>in</strong>g, and<br />
exchange and/or release of tagged sequence data.<br />
A major challenge <strong>in</strong> the postgenomic era will be the identification<br />
of the functions of the predicted 25,000–40,000 plant<br />
genes. A multipronged approach comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g analysis of structural<br />
similarities, expression profiles, and mutant phenotypes<br />
is required for assign<strong>in</strong>g gene function. Mutants offer one avenue<br />
of relat<strong>in</strong>g a gene to its function. Populations with T-<br />
DNA or transposable element-<strong>in</strong>duced knockout mutations are<br />
becom<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly useful for identify<strong>in</strong>g gene function <strong>in</strong><br />
plants. Us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>sertion mutants of rice, it is possible to uncover<br />
regions of the genome that control the expression of genes<br />
determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g developmental processes as well as productivity<br />
and quality characteristics.<br />
The transposition of the maize transposable element Ac<br />
<strong>in</strong> rice <strong>in</strong>troduced through protoplast transformation has been<br />
well demonstrated. A more detailed study of Ac as a tool for<br />
rice functional genomics has been carried out by Enoki et al<br />
352 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
A<br />
Ds enhancer trap (pSK100)<br />
CaMV 35S P- TA DsE<br />
Ubi1(I) P-<br />
LB hph 3¢ uidA ori bla nptll-2¢ P 5¢ sgfpS65T RB<br />
CaMV 35S P-<br />
Ds gene trap (pSK200)<br />
DsG<br />
SA Ubi1(I) P-<br />
LB hph 5¢ 2¢P-nptll bla ori uidA<br />
3¢ sgfpS65T RB<br />
B<br />
Sequence<br />
phenotyp<strong>in</strong>g<br />
GUS assay<br />
Ac transposase (pSK300)<br />
CaMV 35S P-<br />
LB hph Ac W Ubi1(l) RB<br />
Supertransformation<br />
(Ac ® Ds)<br />
Ds PCR<br />
Ds l<strong>in</strong>es ´ Ac l<strong>in</strong>es<br />
Ds/Ac<br />
Mutagenic population<br />
(Ac + Ds + GFP + )<br />
Co-transformation<br />
(Ac + Ds)<br />
Screen<strong>in</strong>g population<br />
GFP – GFP +<br />
Hyg s Hyg r Hyg s Hyg r<br />
Ac PCR<br />
+ – – +<br />
Discard<br />
Screen<br />
next<br />
generation<br />
+ –<br />
Discard<br />
Discard<br />
Sequence<br />
phenotyp<strong>in</strong>g<br />
GUS assay<br />
Ac PCR<br />
– +<br />
Ds PCR<br />
Ds PCR<br />
+ – – +<br />
Excision PCR<br />
+ –<br />
Discard<br />
Discard<br />
Screen<br />
next<br />
generation<br />
Fig. 1. Transposon gene and enhancer<br />
trapp<strong>in</strong>g constructs and<br />
trapp<strong>in</strong>g protocol. (A) Ds enhancer<br />
trap (DsE), Ds gene trap (DsG),<br />
and Ac transposase constructs<br />
used <strong>in</strong> this study. The DsE conta<strong>in</strong>s<br />
a promoterless uidA (gus)<br />
gene with a transcriptional activator<br />
(TA) as a trap reporter, a<br />
manop<strong>in</strong>e synthase 2′ gene promoter-driven<br />
nptII as a trap tracer,<br />
and ampicill<strong>in</strong> resistance gene bla<br />
as a part of the plasmid rescue<br />
system with Escherichia coli orig<strong>in</strong><br />
of replication (ori). The b<strong>in</strong>ary<br />
vector (pCAMBIA 1300 backbone)<br />
with DsE also conta<strong>in</strong>s the Ubi1(I)<br />
promoter-driven sgfpS65T gene<br />
as a donor site reporter and the<br />
CaMV 35S promoter-driven hph<br />
gene as a selectable marker follow<strong>in</strong>g<br />
transformation. The b<strong>in</strong>ary<br />
vector for DsG is the same as for<br />
DsE except that it conta<strong>in</strong>s the<br />
GPA1 <strong>in</strong>tron with splice acceptors<br />
(<strong>in</strong> all three read<strong>in</strong>g frames) <strong>in</strong><br />
front of gus <strong>in</strong>stead of TA and for<br />
the orientation of DsGs. The Ac<br />
construct is also <strong>in</strong> the b<strong>in</strong>ary vector<br />
pCAMBIA 1300 and conta<strong>in</strong>s<br />
a promoter-driven 5′ deleted Ac<br />
transposase and CaMV 35S promoter-driven<br />
hph. (B) Flow chart<br />
of transposon trapp<strong>in</strong>g protocol.<br />
LB = left border, RB = right border.<br />
(1999). The use of a reporter gene conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g a m<strong>in</strong>imal promoter<br />
(enhancer trap) or <strong>in</strong>tron splice acceptors (gene trap)<br />
with tagg<strong>in</strong>g (T-DNA or Ds transposon) sequences facilitates<br />
“trapp<strong>in</strong>g” of genetic regions that do not have a visible phenotype.<br />
This trapp<strong>in</strong>g system has been used effectively <strong>in</strong><br />
Arabidopsis with the two-element Ac/Ds system and <strong>in</strong> rice<br />
via the T-DNA system (Jeon et al 2000). The success of the<br />
two-element Ac/Ds system <strong>in</strong> produc<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>sertion mutants <strong>in</strong><br />
rice has been demonstrated. We have been evaluat<strong>in</strong>g the Ac/<br />
Ds-based gene and enhancer-trapp<strong>in</strong>g constructs developed (for<br />
use <strong>in</strong> rice) by Kumar and Narayanan (1997), which were primarily<br />
based on the constructs used <strong>in</strong> Arabidopsis. Here, we<br />
report on our efforts to build a substantial “gene mach<strong>in</strong>e” (with<br />
a large number of <strong>in</strong>sertional mutants) us<strong>in</strong>g both the T-DNA<br />
and Ac/Ds gene and enhancer trapp<strong>in</strong>g systems.<br />
<strong>Rice</strong> cv. Nipponbare was transformed separately with<br />
Ac transposase, Ds enhancer trap (DsE), and Ds gene trap<br />
(DsG) constructs (Fig. 1A) us<strong>in</strong>g Agrobacterium. Selected Ac<br />
and Ds l<strong>in</strong>es were crossed to produce the mutagenic population<br />
(F 1 plants). A mutagenic population was also produced<br />
by supertransformation or cotransformation. Hygromyc<strong>in</strong>-resistant<br />
(hyg r ) Ac-conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g callus l<strong>in</strong>es (confirmed by polymerase<br />
cha<strong>in</strong> reaction, PCR, and/or Southern blot hybridization)<br />
were supertransformed with DsE or DsG constructs. Plants<br />
regenerated from hyg r and GFP-positive (Ds launch<strong>in</strong>g pad<br />
reporter) callus l<strong>in</strong>es were tested for Ds transposition (trap<br />
Genomics 353
Table 1. The production of stable Ds trap l<strong>in</strong>es us<strong>in</strong>g the two-element Ac/Ds gene/enhancer<br />
trapp<strong>in</strong>g system.<br />
Item Cross<strong>in</strong>g Co- or<br />
supertransformation<br />
No. of starter l<strong>in</strong>es (Ac + Ds + l<strong>in</strong>es) 212 68<br />
Ds active l<strong>in</strong>es (show<strong>in</strong>g GUS spots) 29 out of 104 42<br />
No. of l<strong>in</strong>es screened (first screen<strong>in</strong>g population) 22 (3,251 plants) 17 (944 plants)<br />
No. of plants analyzed 1,197 944<br />
Ds + plants 437 643<br />
Ac – Ds – plants (putative stable traps) 90 49<br />
Ac – Ds + GFP + Ds excision + plants (l<strong>in</strong>ked to Ds) 46 14<br />
Flank<strong>in</strong>g genomic sequences rescued from above 12 12<br />
Independent stable traps (by sequence) 5 12<br />
Ac – Ds + GFP – plants (unl<strong>in</strong>ked to Ds donor site) 26 13<br />
Flank<strong>in</strong>g genomic sequences rescued from above 10 1<br />
Independent stable traps (by sequence) 5 1<br />
reporter GUS activity) and the presence of Ac and Ds by PCR<br />
and/or Southern blot hybridization. Similar analyses were performed<br />
for plants produced by cotransformation. Progenies of<br />
selected mutagenic l<strong>in</strong>es (F 2 of crosses or T 1 of double<br />
transformants) were screened for stable traps as outl<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong><br />
Figure 1B.<br />
Results<br />
We produced 56, 53, and 54 transgenic l<strong>in</strong>es conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g Ac,<br />
Ds enhancer trap (DsE), and Ds gene trap (DsG) constructs,<br />
respectively. Twenty Ac l<strong>in</strong>es, 12 DsE l<strong>in</strong>es, and 14 DsG l<strong>in</strong>es,<br />
each with a s<strong>in</strong>gle transgene locus, were used <strong>in</strong> cross<strong>in</strong>g experiments<br />
to produce the 212 starter mutagenic l<strong>in</strong>es (F 1 progenies).<br />
Sixty-eight starter mutagenic l<strong>in</strong>es (T 0 l<strong>in</strong>es) were also<br />
produced by co- or supertransformation. Cont<strong>in</strong>ual transposition<br />
of Ds <strong>in</strong> callus material, which also conta<strong>in</strong>ed Ac, was<br />
evident from the different numbers and sizes of GUS-sta<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
tissues. GUS sta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g of leaves from the mutagenic population<br />
(F 1 of crosses or T 0 of double transformants) revealed<br />
l<strong>in</strong>eages of early transposition events. More than half of the<br />
putative mutagenic population showed varied numbers and<br />
sizes of GUS spots or patterns, aga<strong>in</strong> suggest<strong>in</strong>g cont<strong>in</strong>ual transposition.<br />
In the first screen<strong>in</strong>g population (F 2 of crosses or T 1<br />
of double transformants), a small number of plants showed<br />
dist<strong>in</strong>ct patterns of GUS expression, <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g germ<strong>in</strong>al transposition.<br />
Some stable Ds trap l<strong>in</strong>es or orig<strong>in</strong>al T-DNA tagged<br />
l<strong>in</strong>es showed mutant phenotypes. Table 1 summarizes the production<br />
of stable Ds trap l<strong>in</strong>es from these starter mutagenic<br />
l<strong>in</strong>es. The first screen<strong>in</strong>g population derived from crosses and<br />
from double (co- or super-) transformation had 2.8% and 1.4%<br />
putative stable traps (Ac – ) unl<strong>in</strong>ked to the orig<strong>in</strong>al Ds launch<strong>in</strong>g<br />
pad, respectively. Possible stable traps still l<strong>in</strong>ked to the<br />
Ds donor sites were 3.8% and 1.5% <strong>in</strong> screen<strong>in</strong>g populations<br />
derived from crosses and double transformation, respectively.<br />
DNA flank<strong>in</strong>g the Ds launch<strong>in</strong>g pad (T-DNA <strong>in</strong>sertion site)<br />
and transposed Ds <strong>in</strong> these stable trap l<strong>in</strong>es are be<strong>in</strong>g cloned<br />
(us<strong>in</strong>g the built-<strong>in</strong> plasmid rescue system) and sequenced, with<br />
sequences compared with those <strong>in</strong> the public databases. Among<br />
12 T-DNA tags rescued, 5 were <strong>in</strong> known sequences. Among<br />
84 Ds tags rescued, 13 were <strong>in</strong> known sequences, 52 <strong>in</strong> unknown<br />
sequences, and the other 19 <strong>in</strong> and around the Ds launch<strong>in</strong>g<br />
pad. Progenies of the trap l<strong>in</strong>es are be<strong>in</strong>g screened for<br />
mutations affect<strong>in</strong>g various aspects of plant growth and development,<br />
and for different spatial, temporal, and developmental<br />
patterns of expression of the trap reporter gene (gus).<br />
Discussion<br />
The most direct method for produc<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>sertion mutants is by<br />
T-DNA tagg<strong>in</strong>g. Jeon et al (2000) reported on the first largescale<br />
T-DNA <strong>in</strong>sertional mutagenesis for functional genomics<br />
<strong>in</strong> rice and produced approximately 18,000 fertile T-DNA gene<br />
trap l<strong>in</strong>es with an average loci number of 1.4. Without a robust<br />
transformation system, it is difficult to produce the large number<br />
of T-DNA tags required to saturate a genome. It has been<br />
estimated that nearly half a million different tagged l<strong>in</strong>es are<br />
required to saturate the rice genome (Jeon et al 2000). We<br />
have yet to fully assess the feasibility of us<strong>in</strong>g the Ac/Ds system<br />
for high-throughput mutagenesis, but it was already evident<br />
that the system could be improved with the <strong>in</strong>corporation<br />
of a negative selector for the Ac construct and a strong tracer<br />
selectable marker for Ds itself or for its subsequent excision.<br />
Cytochrome P450 has been used as a negative selection marker<br />
and bar as a tracer selectable marker <strong>in</strong> their constructs. Earlier,<br />
we demonstrated that tms2 can be used as a negative selection<br />
marker <strong>in</strong> rice (Upadhyaya et al 2000) and that bar can<br />
be used as a strong Ds tracer or excision marker. We have<br />
<strong>in</strong>corporated these features <strong>in</strong> our new constructs (Zhou et al,<br />
this volume), which will greatly simplify the screen<strong>in</strong>g for stably<br />
tagged l<strong>in</strong>es, thus enabl<strong>in</strong>g us to build a substantial “gene<br />
mach<strong>in</strong>e” with<strong>in</strong> the next 3 years.<br />
Because of the need to produce nearly half a million<br />
tagged l<strong>in</strong>es for saturat<strong>in</strong>g the genome, that is, to have stable<br />
tags/traps <strong>in</strong> each of the predicted 40,000 plant genes (referred<br />
to as the “<strong>Rice</strong> Gene Mach<strong>in</strong>e”), it is imperative that an <strong>in</strong>ternational<br />
collaboration be developed. To our knowledge, at least<br />
five groups are actively <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> produc<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>sertion mu-<br />
354 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
tants <strong>in</strong> rice us<strong>in</strong>g T-DNA, Ac/Ds, En/I, and Arabidopsis Tag1,<br />
with several other groups <strong>in</strong>terested <strong>in</strong> jo<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the “tagg<strong>in</strong>g”<br />
effort. It is absolutely vital to set up a common platform (an<br />
<strong>in</strong>ternational consortium) for exchang<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>formation on tagged<br />
l<strong>in</strong>es so that the whole scientific community can have access<br />
to the <strong>Rice</strong> Gene Mach<strong>in</strong>e. As part of this effort, a labnotecum-relational<br />
database has been created, which catalogues<br />
all the data produced on Ac and Ds l<strong>in</strong>es, Ds trap l<strong>in</strong>es, and<br />
flank<strong>in</strong>g rice genomic sequences, along with <strong>in</strong>formation on<br />
mutant phenotypes and trap reporter expression patterns as well<br />
as sequence <strong>in</strong>formation and sequence homology. A tagged<br />
sequence database has also been set up, which will be made<br />
available to registered users. A parallel search for sequences<br />
homologous to our tagged sequences is be<strong>in</strong>g actively carried<br />
out <strong>in</strong> publicly available databases. A Web site is also be<strong>in</strong>g<br />
designed for the exchange or <strong>in</strong>stant release of <strong>in</strong>formation on<br />
l<strong>in</strong>es with tags <strong>in</strong> known gene sequences.<br />
References<br />
Enoki H, Izawa T, Kawahara M, Komatsu M, Koh S, Kyozuka J,<br />
Shimamoto K. 1999. Ac as a tool for the functional genomics<br />
of rice. Plant J. 19:605-613.<br />
Jeon J-S, Lee S, Jung K-H, Jun S-H, Jeong D-H, Lee J, Kim C, Jang<br />
S, Lee S, Yang K, Nam J, An K, Han M-J, Sung R-J, Choi H-<br />
S, Yu JH, Choi J-H, Cho S-Y, Cha S-S, Kim S-I, An G. 2000.<br />
T-DNA <strong>in</strong>sertional mutagenesis for functional genomics <strong>in</strong><br />
rice. Plant J. 22:561-570.<br />
Kumar SC, Narayanan KK. 1997. Gene and enhancer trap constructs<br />
for isolat<strong>in</strong>g genetic regions from rice. <strong>Rice</strong> Biotechnol. Q.<br />
31:17-18.<br />
Upadhyaya NM, Zhou X-R, Wu L, Ramm K, Dennis ES. 2000. The<br />
tms2 gene as a negative selection marker <strong>in</strong> rice. Plant Mol.<br />
Biol. Rep. 18(3):227-233.<br />
Notes<br />
Comparative genomics <strong>in</strong> the Oryzeae<br />
S.A. Jackson, J.W. Lilly, R.L. Phillips, W.C. Kennard, and R.A. Porter<br />
Authors’ addresses: N.M. Upadhyaya, X.-R. Zhou, Q.-H. Zhu, A.<br />
Eamens, K. Ramm, L. Wu, R. Sivakumar, T. Kato, D.-W. Yun,<br />
W.J. Peacock, E.S. Dennis, CSIRO Plant Industry, Canberra,<br />
ACT 2601, Australia; S. Kumar, K.K. Narayanan, and G.<br />
Thomas, Centre for Biotechnology, SPIC Science Foundation,<br />
111 Mount Road, Gu<strong>in</strong>dy, Chennai 600 032, India.<br />
Acknowledgments: The authors wish to thank Gra<strong>in</strong>Gene and the<br />
GRDC for their f<strong>in</strong>ancial support. Also, thanks are due to Drs.<br />
A. Chaudhury and P.M. Waterhouse for their <strong>in</strong>puts as th<strong>in</strong>ktank<br />
members.<br />
American wild rice (Zizania palustris) is a close relative of rice (Oryza sativa), with both belong<strong>in</strong>g to the tribe<br />
Oryzeae. To del<strong>in</strong>eate the position of wild rice with<strong>in</strong> the Oryzeae, genes Adh1, Adh2, and matK were sequenced<br />
and compared with DNA sequences from other members of the Oryzeae. Both Adh1 and Adh2 appear to be<br />
duplicated <strong>in</strong> the Zizania species, although not because of polyploidy as <strong>in</strong> the case of many wild rice species.<br />
Unlike the rest of the Oryzeae, the Zizania species have chromosome numbers that differ from the basic number<br />
of 12. Three chromosomes <strong>in</strong> Zizania sp. appear to be duplicates of rice chromosomes based on comparative<br />
genetic mapp<strong>in</strong>g. There is, however, extensive genetic col<strong>in</strong>earity between wild rice and rice. More than 80% of<br />
the RFLP loci are col<strong>in</strong>ear between these two species. We have undertaken a physical mapp<strong>in</strong>g approach to<br />
complement comparative genetic mapp<strong>in</strong>g. Although ribosomal DNA loci do not appear to be conserved <strong>in</strong><br />
number or location with<strong>in</strong> the Oryza species, wild rice has two 5S rDNA loci and one NOR locus. As <strong>in</strong> other Oryza<br />
species, the two 5S rDNA loci are <strong>in</strong>timately associated with the centromeres and the NOR is telomerically<br />
located. Several rice centromeric sequences have been used for FISH and Southern analysis. Only RCS1, a<br />
conserved cereal centromeric sequence, appears to be conserved. Bacterial artificial chromosomes, which are<br />
part of the rice physical map be<strong>in</strong>g sequenced, are be<strong>in</strong>g mapped first <strong>in</strong> rice and subsequently <strong>in</strong> wild rice to<br />
physically compare large genomic regions between these two species, exam<strong>in</strong>e chromosome evolution, and<br />
evaluate the conservation of gene order and spac<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the Oryzeae. Thus far, there appears to be an accumulation<br />
of <strong>in</strong>tergenic sequences that are not conserved between wild rice and rice. Therefore, the accumulation of<br />
<strong>in</strong>tergenic DNA <strong>in</strong> the evolution of cereal plant species appears to occur at a high rate even with<strong>in</strong> closely related<br />
species <strong>in</strong> which genic sequences are closely conserved.<br />
Zizania palustris (American wild rice) is the only gra<strong>in</strong> native<br />
to the North American cont<strong>in</strong>ent. It has a long history of cultivation,<br />
hav<strong>in</strong>g been lake-harvested by Native Americans. Wild<br />
rice has imperfect flowers, with the female flowers anatomically<br />
superior to the male flowers, which presumably promotes<br />
outcross<strong>in</strong>g. The Zizania species are unusual <strong>in</strong> the tribe<br />
Oryzeae because they have members with chromosome<br />
complements that are not multiples of n = 12. Z. aquatica and<br />
Z. palustris are both n = 15 and Z. latifolia is n = 17. Based on<br />
a comparative genetic map of Z. palustris and Oryza sativa,<br />
three of the rice chromosomes (1, 4, and 9) appear to be present<br />
as duplicates <strong>in</strong> Z. palustris (Kennard et al 1999). The Z.<br />
palustris genome is roughly twice the size of the rice genome,<br />
Genomics 355
Leersia perrieri<br />
Zizaniopsis villanensis<br />
Zizania aquatica<br />
Zizania palustris<br />
Zizania latifolia<br />
Duplicated<br />
Zizania latifolia<br />
Zizania aquatica<br />
Rhynchoryza subulata<br />
Oryza sativa<br />
Porteresia coarctata<br />
Zea mays<br />
Fig. 1. Phylogram of Adh1 sequences<br />
from several previously<br />
sequenced Oryzeae species (Ge<br />
et al 1999) and three Zizania species.<br />
The Adh1 gene is duplicated<br />
<strong>in</strong> Z. aquatica and Z. latifolia. The<br />
Zizania species are more closely<br />
related to Rhynchoryza subulata<br />
than Oryza sativa.<br />
perhaps because of the <strong>in</strong>creased amount of pericentromeric<br />
heterochromat<strong>in</strong>.<br />
Phylogenetic position <strong>in</strong> Oryzeae<br />
Recent DNA sequenc<strong>in</strong>g of the phytochrome B gene (Matthews<br />
et al 2000) showed that Z. palustris is a member of the tribe<br />
Oryzeae. The nuclear Adh genes, Adh1 and Adh2, and the chloroplast<br />
gene (matK) were sequenced from Z. palustris, Z.<br />
aquatica, and Z. latifolia and compared with other Oryzeae<br />
sequences from Genbank (Ge et al 1999). Us<strong>in</strong>g standard sequence<br />
software, Zizania species were determ<strong>in</strong>ed to be more<br />
closely related to Rhynchoryza subulata, a South American<br />
member of the Oryzeae, than to the Oryza species (Fig. 1).<br />
This conclusion was supported by the Adh1, Adh2, and matK<br />
phylogenies. Interest<strong>in</strong>gly, the Adh genes appear to be duplicated<br />
with<strong>in</strong> all three Zizania species. Thus, the duplication of<br />
these genes may have occurred after the specification of the<br />
Zizanias from R. subulata. Ge et al (1999) sequenced these<br />
genes from other members of Oryzeae and did not f<strong>in</strong>d duplicated<br />
Adh genes except <strong>in</strong> polyploid Oryza species. In O. sativa,<br />
Adh1 and Adh2 are separated by 35 kb on chromosome<br />
11 (Tarch<strong>in</strong>i et al 2000). Thus, this entire region may have<br />
been duplicated <strong>in</strong> the Zizania species. We are study<strong>in</strong>g this<br />
us<strong>in</strong>g a physical mapp<strong>in</strong>g approach.<br />
Comparative genetic and physical mapp<strong>in</strong>g<br />
RFLP mapp<strong>in</strong>g of Z. palustris us<strong>in</strong>g rice probes<br />
A restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) map was<br />
constructed for Z. palustris us<strong>in</strong>g rice, oat, and maize mapp<strong>in</strong>g<br />
clones. Based on a shared set of mapp<strong>in</strong>g probes, a comparative<br />
map of rice and Z. palustris was constructed (Kennard<br />
et al 1999). More than 80% of the genetic loci <strong>in</strong> this comparative<br />
map are col<strong>in</strong>ear between these two species, mak<strong>in</strong>g<br />
it the most col<strong>in</strong>ear comparison to date. Three of the rice chromosomes<br />
(1, 4, and 9) appear to be duplicated and, at this<br />
po<strong>in</strong>t, rice chromosome 12 does not appear to be col<strong>in</strong>early<br />
conserved <strong>in</strong> Z. palustris, which has been observed <strong>in</strong> other<br />
comparative mapp<strong>in</strong>g studies <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g rice. Several QTLs for<br />
agronomic traits were mapped us<strong>in</strong>g the RFLP map <strong>in</strong> Z.<br />
palustris, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g those for seed nondormancy, nonshatter<strong>in</strong>g,<br />
disease resistance, maturity, and yield. Several of the mapped<br />
QTLs for these traits appear to be col<strong>in</strong>ear with QTLs for similar<br />
traits <strong>in</strong> rice (Kennard et al, personal communication).<br />
356 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
3 kb<br />
1 kb<br />
1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5<br />
A<br />
B<br />
related Brassica rapa (Jackson et al 2000). The B. rapa genome<br />
is three times larger than the Arabidopsis genome, although<br />
this may be due to genome duplication. However,<br />
Arabidopsis BACs were successfully hybridized to both chromosomes<br />
and extended DNA fibers of B. rapa. The fiber-FISH<br />
signals derived from Arabidopsis BACs used on DNA fibers<br />
from B. rapa were similar <strong>in</strong> size to those observed <strong>in</strong><br />
Arabidopsis, suggest<strong>in</strong>g that there had not been an accumulation<br />
of <strong>in</strong>tergenic sequences <strong>in</strong> the evolution of these species.<br />
When BACs conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g rice DNA were hybridized to extended<br />
DNA fibers of Z. palustris, there appeared to be an accumulation<br />
of <strong>in</strong>tergenic sequences such that it was difficult to delimit<br />
the BAC ends for measurement. Thus, <strong>in</strong> these closely<br />
related species, it appeared that there was an accumulation of<br />
nonconserved <strong>in</strong>tergenic sequences, suggest<strong>in</strong>g that, <strong>in</strong> cereals,<br />
the mode of genome evolution differs from that observed<br />
<strong>in</strong> the B. rapa/Arabidopsis complex.<br />
Fig. 2. Southern blot of BamHi-digested genomic DNA of (1) Zizania<br />
palustris, (2) Z. aquatica, (3) Z. latifolia, (4) Oryza sativa, and (5)<br />
Zea mays. (A) RCS2, a tandemly repeated O. sativa centromeric<br />
clone, was present only <strong>in</strong> O. sativa. (B) RCS1, an <strong>in</strong>terspersed<br />
centromeric sequence from O. sativa, is present <strong>in</strong> all of the Zizania<br />
species and Zea mays. Lane 3, Z. latifolia, was underloaded.<br />
Physical mapp<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Z. palustris<br />
Ribosomal DNA sequences do not appear to be conserved <strong>in</strong><br />
location or number <strong>in</strong> the Oryza species (Shishido et al 2000).<br />
Ribosomal sequences were mapped <strong>in</strong> Z. palustris. Two 5S<br />
ribosomal arrays and one NOR (18S-5.8S-25S) were mapped<br />
<strong>in</strong> Z. palustris. As <strong>in</strong> other Oryzeae species, the 5S rDNA arrays<br />
were <strong>in</strong>timately associated with the centromere and the<br />
NOR was telomerically located. In O. sativa, at least one of<br />
the 5S rDNA sequences is located with<strong>in</strong> RCS2, the rice centromeric<br />
tandem repeat (F. Dong and J. Jiang, unpublished<br />
data).<br />
Dong et al (1998) isolated several rice sequences from<br />
O. sativa. RCS1, a conserved cereal centromeric sequence, is<br />
present <strong>in</strong> Z. palustris centromeres as shown by fluorescence<br />
<strong>in</strong> situ hybridization (FISH), and is present <strong>in</strong> the genomes Z.<br />
aquatica and Z. latifolia as shown by Southern analysis (Fig.<br />
2B). Us<strong>in</strong>g RCS1, polymorphisms have been found <strong>in</strong> the Z.<br />
palustris mapp<strong>in</strong>g population. Similar to what has been done<br />
<strong>in</strong> O. sativa (Wang et al 2000), we are def<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the genetic<br />
location of the centromeres us<strong>in</strong>g this conserved sequence.<br />
Based on Southern analysis, RCS2, a tandemly repeated centromeric<br />
sequence, is not conserved <strong>in</strong> the Zizania species (Fig.<br />
2A). We are now attempt<strong>in</strong>g to clone centromeric sequences<br />
from Z. palustris to understand the evolution of centromeres<br />
between closely related species.<br />
Several rice bacterial artificial chromosomes (BACs) that<br />
are part of the rice BAC physical map be<strong>in</strong>g sequenced have<br />
been used to probe the genome of Z. palustris to understand<br />
comparative genome structure and evolution. This technique<br />
was successfully used to map Arabidopsis BACs <strong>in</strong> the closely<br />
References<br />
Dong F, Miller J, Jackson SA, Wang G-L, Ronald PC, Jiang J. 1998.<br />
<strong>Rice</strong> (Oryza sativa) centromeric regions consist of complex<br />
DNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95:8135-8140.<br />
Ge S, Sang T, Lu B-R, Hong D-Y. 1999. Phylogeny of rice genomes<br />
with emphasis on orig<strong>in</strong> of allotetraploid species. Proc. Natl.<br />
Acad. Sci. USA 96:14400-14405.<br />
Jackson SA, Cheng Z, Wang M-L, Goodman HM, Jiang J. 2000.<br />
Comparative FISH mapp<strong>in</strong>g of a 431-kb Arabidopsis thaliana<br />
BAC contig reveals the role of chromosomal duplications <strong>in</strong><br />
the expansion of the Brassica rapa genome. <strong>Genetics</strong> 156:833-<br />
838.<br />
Kennard W, Phillips RL, Porter R, Grombacher A. 1999. A comparative<br />
map of wild rice (Zizania palustris L. 2n=2x=30).<br />
Theor. Appl. Genet. 99:793-799.<br />
Matthews S, Tsai RC, Kellog EA. 2000. Phylogenetic structure <strong>in</strong><br />
the grass family (Poaceae): evidence from the nuclear gene<br />
phytochrome B. Am. J. Bot. 87:96-107.<br />
Shishido R, Sano Y, Fukui K. 2000. Ribosomal DNAs: an exception<br />
to the conservation of gene order <strong>in</strong> rice genomes. Mol. Gen.<br />
Genet. 263:586-591.<br />
Tarch<strong>in</strong>i R, Biddle P, W<strong>in</strong>eland R, T<strong>in</strong>gey S, Rafalski A. 2000. The<br />
complete sequence of 340 kb of DNA around the rice Adh1-<br />
Adh2 region reveals <strong>in</strong>terrupted col<strong>in</strong>earity with maize chromosome<br />
4. Plant Cell 12:381-391.<br />
Wang J, Jiang J, Zhang Q. 2000. Mapp<strong>in</strong>g of centromeric regions on<br />
the molecular l<strong>in</strong>kage map of rice (Oryza sativa L.) us<strong>in</strong>g centromere-associated<br />
sequences. Mol. Gen. Genet. 263:165-172.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ addresses: S.A. Jackson, R.L. Phillips, and R.A. Porter,<br />
Department of Agronomy and Plant <strong>Genetics</strong>, University of<br />
M<strong>in</strong>nesota, St. Paul, MN 55108; J.W. Lilly, Program <strong>in</strong> Plant<br />
Breed<strong>in</strong>g and Plant <strong>Genetics</strong>, University of Wiscons<strong>in</strong>-Madison,<br />
Madison, WI 53076; and W.C. Kennard, Monsanto Company,<br />
3302 SE Convenience Blvd., Ankeny, IA 50021, USA.<br />
Genomics 357
T-DNA as a potential <strong>in</strong>sertional mutagen <strong>in</strong> rice<br />
C. Sallaud, D. Meynard, J.P. Brizard, M. Bès, C. Gay, M. Raynal, E. Bourgeois, H. Hoge, M. Delseny, and E. Guiderdoni<br />
We <strong>in</strong>vestigated the potential of Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation for produc<strong>in</strong>g a genome-wide library of T-<br />
DNA rice plants <strong>in</strong>dividually characterized by their flank<strong>in</strong>g sequence tag (FST). A japonica rice callus transformation procedure—which<br />
relies both on high frequency (75% and 96% <strong>in</strong> Taipei 309 and Nipponbare, respectively) of cocultured calliyield<strong>in</strong>g<br />
resistant cell l<strong>in</strong>es and <strong>in</strong>dependent generation of multiple (2 to 30) resistant cell l<strong>in</strong>es per cocultured callus—was<br />
optimized. Potential efficiencies were as high as 5 and 7 <strong>in</strong>dependent transformants per cocultured callus <strong>in</strong> cultivars Taipei<br />
309 and Nipponbare. We further studied the <strong>in</strong>tegration of the T-DNA <strong>in</strong> more than 200 transgenic plants. Around 35% of the<br />
T 0<br />
plants were found to harbor one copy of the T-DNA <strong>in</strong> both populations. In Taipei 309, 90% of these plants did not have<br />
<strong>in</strong>tegrated plasmid backbone sequences and 95% segregated the hygromyc<strong>in</strong> resistance trait accord<strong>in</strong>g to a 3:1 ratio <strong>in</strong> their<br />
T 1<br />
progenies. In multiple-copy plants, 31% of the plants had <strong>in</strong>tegrated plasmid backbone sequences and 52% and 10%<br />
segregated accord<strong>in</strong>g to a 3:1 and 15:1 ratio, respectively. Us<strong>in</strong>g an efficient polymerase cha<strong>in</strong> reaction walk<strong>in</strong>g method, 82<br />
(58%) DNA regions adjacent to the left border of T-DNA <strong>in</strong>serts (FSTs) have been isolated and sequenced. Results of a<br />
homology search <strong>in</strong>dicated that eight known genes had been tagged with the T-DNA.<br />
Insertional mutagenesis is a means of disrupt<strong>in</strong>g gene function<br />
based on the <strong>in</strong>sertion of foreign DNA <strong>in</strong>to a sequence of <strong>in</strong>terest.<br />
In higher plants, this encompasses the use of transposable<br />
elements such as a transposon or retrotransposon, or T-<br />
DNA. In rice, the autonomous maize Ac element has been transferred<br />
<strong>in</strong>to the rice genome s<strong>in</strong>ce the early 1990s and has proved<br />
to actively transpose and to <strong>in</strong>sert <strong>in</strong> genes with a 3–4-fold<br />
specificity, allow<strong>in</strong>g the establishment of gene mach<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong> cv.<br />
Toride 1 and Nipponbare (Enoki et al 1999, Greco et al, unpublished).<br />
More sophisticated double-component AcTpase/<br />
Ds systems have recently been eng<strong>in</strong>eered <strong>in</strong> japonica rice cv.<br />
Dong-J<strong>in</strong> and have proved to be functional. The native rice<br />
Ty1-copia Tos-17 retrotransposon, the copy number of which<br />
is specifically amplified dur<strong>in</strong>g tissue culture, has also proved<br />
to be a valuable tool for forward and reverse genetics <strong>in</strong> rice<br />
cv. Nipponbare (Hirochika 1999).<br />
Although rice is amenable to Agrobacterium-mediated<br />
transformation with efficiencies compatible with the eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g<br />
of a large range of genes of <strong>in</strong>terest, T-DNA <strong>in</strong>sertional<br />
mutagenesis has so far not been undertaken. This is because a<br />
high-throughput transformation procedure permitt<strong>in</strong>g the generation<br />
of thousands of transformants <strong>in</strong> a s<strong>in</strong>gle experiment<br />
has not yet been reported. In a large sample of transgenic plants,<br />
it is also important to determ<strong>in</strong>e whether the most frequent<br />
organization of the <strong>in</strong>tegrated T-DNA is compatible with further<br />
PCR-based screen<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> DNA pools and recovery of<br />
flank<strong>in</strong>g regions conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g sufficiently <strong>in</strong>formative sequences<br />
for homology searches.<br />
We <strong>in</strong>vestigated the potential of T-DNA transfer for produc<strong>in</strong>g<br />
a genome-wide library of <strong>in</strong>sertional mutants <strong>in</strong> rice to<br />
be primarily used <strong>in</strong> reverse genetics. We report on the development<br />
of a highly efficient transformation procedure rely<strong>in</strong>g<br />
on both a careful choice of the target callus source and a modified<br />
coculture and selection procedure <strong>in</strong> two model japonica<br />
rice cultivars. We further determ<strong>in</strong>ed the organization of the<br />
T-DNA <strong>in</strong> more than 200 transformation events and isolated<br />
the genomic region adjacent to the left border from 80 T-DNA<br />
<strong>in</strong>serts.<br />
Materials and methods<br />
The 13.8-kb b<strong>in</strong>ary plasmid pC30063 was constructed by P.<br />
Ouwerkerk (Leiden University, The Netherlands) by <strong>in</strong>sert<strong>in</strong>g<br />
the 1,915-bp BamHI/PstI fragment of pMON30063 (k<strong>in</strong>dly<br />
provided by K.L. F<strong>in</strong>cher, Monsanto Company, St Louis, USA)<br />
conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the S65Tgfp cod<strong>in</strong>g sequence-controlled CaMV 35S<br />
promoter with a duplicated enhancer sequence and the nos3′<br />
term<strong>in</strong>ator, <strong>in</strong> the multiple clon<strong>in</strong>g site of the pCAMBIA1301<br />
b<strong>in</strong>ary vector (R. Jefferson, CAMBIA, Canberra, Australia)<br />
(Fig. 1). Embryogenic nodular units released from the primary<br />
embryo scutellum-derived callus of the japonica cultivars<br />
Taipei 309 and Nipponbare were immersed <strong>in</strong> 25 mL of liquid<br />
coculture medium conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g Agrobacterium EHA 105<br />
(pC30063) cells for 10–15 m<strong>in</strong>, then transferred to petri dishes<br />
conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g solid coculture medium for a 3-d <strong>in</strong>cubation at 25<br />
°C <strong>in</strong> the dark. The procedure for coculture, select<strong>in</strong>g resistant<br />
cell l<strong>in</strong>es—us<strong>in</strong>g two 2–3-wk subcultures on different selection<br />
media, and evolv<strong>in</strong>g transgenic rice plants—will be detailed<br />
elsewhere.<br />
Genomic DNA (2.5 µg) was digested with H<strong>in</strong>dIII, which<br />
cuts once <strong>in</strong> the T-DNA (Fig. 1), and transferred to nylon membranes<br />
(Hybond N+, Amersham) after electrophoresis accord<strong>in</strong>g<br />
to the Southern blot procedure. Hybridizations were realized<br />
with gusA and hph cod<strong>in</strong>g sequence and the 300-bp sequences<br />
adjacent to the left (LB out) and right (RB out) borders<br />
outside the T-DNA (Fig. 1). Flank<strong>in</strong>g sequence tags (FSTs)<br />
were amplified follow<strong>in</strong>g a PCR walk<strong>in</strong>g method (Siebert et al<br />
1995) adapted to plant materials by Devic et al (1997) and<br />
later modified by Balzergue and coworkers (unpublished).<br />
358 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
H<strong>in</strong>dIII (4,336)<br />
4.3 kb 3.1 kb<br />
LB out hph e35S gfp e35S 35S gus RB out<br />
T-border (left)<br />
T-border (right)<br />
CaMV 35S poly-A Nos poly-A Nos poly-A<br />
Fig. 1. T-DNA of the b<strong>in</strong>ary plasmid pC30063 was used <strong>in</strong> transformation, <strong>in</strong>dicated by restriction sites and<br />
probes (black bar) used for molecular analysis of transgenic rice plants.<br />
Table 1. Transformation of two rice cultivars by Agrobacterium stra<strong>in</strong> EHA105 bear<strong>in</strong>g the pC30063 b<strong>in</strong>ary<br />
plasmid.<br />
Cocultured GFP+ cell l<strong>in</strong>es Number of Potential<br />
Cultivar Cultured resistant cell per cocultured resistant cell m<strong>in</strong>imum<br />
calli (A) l<strong>in</strong>es (B) callus (C)(mean ± l<strong>in</strong>es a regenerat<strong>in</strong>g transformation<br />
(no.) (%) SD) (no.) plants [no. and efficiency<br />
% regeneration (D)] (A × B × C × D)/A<br />
Taipei 309 110 75.4 4.9 ± 3.0 264 (52.8) 195.1<br />
Nipponbare 100 96.0 7.3 ± 4.2 116 (49.8) 349.0<br />
a A subset of randomly chosen Hyg R calli was placed under regeneration conditions irrespective of whether they exhibit GFP activity or<br />
not.<br />
Results and discussion<br />
High-efficiency transformation<br />
Table 1 presents the results of the coculture experiments of<br />
embryogenic callus pieces with Agrobacterium stra<strong>in</strong> EHA105<br />
bear<strong>in</strong>g the b<strong>in</strong>ary plasmid pC30063: 75.4 and 96.0 of<br />
cocultured calli yielded an average of five and seven unambiguously<br />
green fluorescent prote<strong>in</strong> (GFP)-positive,<br />
hygromyc<strong>in</strong>-resistant cell l<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong> cv. Taipei 309 and<br />
Nipponbare, respectively (Fig. 2). The formation of multiple<br />
GFP-positive resistant cell l<strong>in</strong>es aris<strong>in</strong>g from structurally <strong>in</strong>dependent<br />
regions of the callus was observed as early as 12 d<br />
after transfer to the first selection medium, when whitish translucent<br />
globular proliferations developed from the dark brownturn<strong>in</strong>g<br />
cocultured callus. The regeneration frequency (about<br />
50% <strong>in</strong> both cultivars) was based on the regeneration of randomly<br />
chosen hygromyc<strong>in</strong>-resistant calli irrespective of their<br />
GFP activity. Upon monitor<strong>in</strong>g the GFP activity of calli on<br />
RN medium, we found no significant difference between GFPpositive<br />
and GFP-negative calli <strong>in</strong> terms of regeneration frequency<br />
(data not shown). The potential m<strong>in</strong>imum transformation<br />
efficiency (PMTE) is 2 to 3.5 <strong>in</strong>dependent plants per<br />
cocultured callus <strong>in</strong> cv. Taipei 309 and Nipponbare. In this<br />
calculation, we assumed that all the hygromyc<strong>in</strong>-resistant cell<br />
l<strong>in</strong>es were <strong>in</strong>dependent transformation events, but we did not<br />
take <strong>in</strong>to account the compact hygromyc<strong>in</strong>-resistant calli display<strong>in</strong>g<br />
fa<strong>in</strong>t or no GFP activity, which represent 60% and 51%<br />
of the total calli produced <strong>in</strong> the two cultivars, respectively. If<br />
all the hygromyc<strong>in</strong>-resistant cell l<strong>in</strong>es formed on the second<br />
A<br />
Fig. 2. (A) Multiple globular GFP-positive formations aris<strong>in</strong>g from<br />
a cocultured callus 14 d after transfer to selective medium. (B)<br />
Multiple hygromyc<strong>in</strong>-resistant cell l<strong>in</strong>es develop from cocultured<br />
calli 5 wk follow<strong>in</strong>g the coculture experiment with Agrobacterium<br />
stra<strong>in</strong> EHA105 bear<strong>in</strong>g the pC30063; observed us<strong>in</strong>g a Leica<br />
MZFLIII fluorescence stereomicroscope.<br />
selection medium are transferred upon regeneration, the actual<br />
potential transformation efficiency would reach 5 and 7 <strong>in</strong><br />
Taipei 309 and Nipponbare. Previous reported efficiencies of<br />
Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of rice callus tissues<br />
typically ranged from 0.1 to 0.5. Careful selection of start<strong>in</strong>g<br />
materials and modification of coculture and selection procedures<br />
can enhance transformation.<br />
B<br />
Genomics 359
Organization of T-DNA <strong>in</strong> transgenic rice plants<br />
To verify that hygromyc<strong>in</strong>-resistant cell l<strong>in</strong>es generated by a<br />
s<strong>in</strong>gle cocultured callus do represent <strong>in</strong>dependent transformation<br />
events, we characterized 120 Taipei 309 plants obta<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
from 17 cocultured calli, each regenerat<strong>in</strong>g a range of 4 to 23<br />
hygromyc<strong>in</strong>-resistant plants (Table 2). As illustrated <strong>in</strong> Figure<br />
3 for callus 86, 22 out of 23 plants exhibited dist<strong>in</strong>ct hybridization<br />
patterns, whereas plants 86.8 and 86.10 were clonal<br />
and were likely derived from the fragmentation of a s<strong>in</strong>gle transformed<br />
cell l<strong>in</strong>e. Overall, 118 (97%) out of 120 plants analyzed<br />
were found to exhibit <strong>in</strong>dependent patterns. A comparable<br />
conclusion was drawn from the analysis of T-DNA plants<br />
Table 2. Molecular characterization of 120 transgenic plants<br />
regenerated from 17 cocultured calli of cv. Taipei 309.<br />
Cocultured Regenerated Independent S<strong>in</strong>gle-copy<br />
callus number plants analyzed events (no.) plants<br />
(no.)<br />
11 8 8 2<br />
14 5 5 1<br />
16 11 11 0<br />
21 5 5 2<br />
26 4 4 1<br />
27 4 4 0<br />
33 5 5 1<br />
45 8 6 4<br />
48 6 6 2<br />
60 9 9 2<br />
63 5 5 2<br />
68 5 5 3<br />
70 5 5 2<br />
79 7 7 4<br />
81 4 4 1<br />
83 6 6 1<br />
86 23 23 6<br />
Total 120 118 34<br />
of cultivars Nipponbare, Zhongzuo 321, and Azucena (data<br />
not shown), <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g that the generation of multiple transformation<br />
events from a s<strong>in</strong>gle cocultured callus is a general<br />
phenomenon.<br />
The average number of T-DNA <strong>in</strong>serts <strong>in</strong> Taipei 309<br />
and Nipponbare populations has been estimated to be 1.5 to 2.<br />
A s<strong>in</strong>gle T-DNA copy represented 37% and 41% of the T-<br />
DNA plants <strong>in</strong> cv. Taipei 309 and Nipponbare, respectively,<br />
and their progenies segregated accord<strong>in</strong>g to a 3:1 ratio for<br />
hygromyc<strong>in</strong> resistance (Table 3). N<strong>in</strong>ety percent of the T 1 l<strong>in</strong>es<br />
exhibited gusA and gfp reporter gene activities, suggest<strong>in</strong>g that<br />
transgene silenc<strong>in</strong>g occurred at low frequency <strong>in</strong> this group of<br />
plants (data not shown). The 3:1 segregation ratio was also<br />
observed <strong>in</strong> 52% and 20.6% of the T 1 progenies of multiplecopy<br />
plants of cv. Taipei 309 and Nipponbare, suggest<strong>in</strong>g that<br />
the copies had <strong>in</strong>serted at several sites but <strong>in</strong> a s<strong>in</strong>gle genetic<br />
locus. However, the possibility that the different T-DNA copies<br />
had <strong>in</strong>tegrated several genetic loci with only one locus be<strong>in</strong>g<br />
actively expressed cannot be ruled out. We used two probes<br />
(LB out and RB out) hybridiz<strong>in</strong>g just outside of the right and<br />
left T-DNA border end, respectively (Fig. 1), to detect <strong>in</strong>tegration<br />
of non-T-DNA sequences. Upon analyses, we observed<br />
a significant proportion of plants (20%) that have <strong>in</strong>tegrated<br />
the b<strong>in</strong>ary vector backbone. S<strong>in</strong>gle-copy plants that have <strong>in</strong>tegrated<br />
the b<strong>in</strong>ary vector backbone had a lower frequency (9%)<br />
than multiple-copy (31%) plants <strong>in</strong> Taipei 309. This latter result<br />
appears consistent with those obta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> PCR-based characterization<br />
of 226 T 0 plants of different cultivars us<strong>in</strong>g stra<strong>in</strong>s<br />
EHA101 and LBA4404. These harbor a comparable<br />
pCAMBIA1301-derived vector (Y<strong>in</strong> and Wang 2000) where<br />
33.2% of the T 0 plants were proven to conta<strong>in</strong> non-T-DNA<br />
sequences.<br />
L<strong>in</strong>e no.<br />
kb<br />
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23<br />
10<br />
7<br />
5<br />
4<br />
hph<br />
H<strong>in</strong>dIII<br />
10<br />
7<br />
5<br />
4<br />
3<br />
gusA<br />
H<strong>in</strong>dIII<br />
Fig. 3. Southern blot analysis of H<strong>in</strong>dIII digests of genomic DNA of 23 plants regenerated from<br />
cocultured callus 86, hybridized to the hph and gusA probes. Arrows <strong>in</strong>dicate the two l<strong>in</strong>es that<br />
have the same T-DNA <strong>in</strong>tegration pattern.<br />
360 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
Table 3. Molecular characterization and progeny analyses of transgenic plants of two rice cultivars.<br />
T 0 Frequency of T-DNA <strong>in</strong>serts Segregation analysis <strong>in</strong> T 1 progeny<br />
Cultivar plants <strong>in</strong>dependent (no.)<br />
(no.) events<br />
S<strong>in</strong>gle Multiple S<strong>in</strong>gle-copy l<strong>in</strong>es Multiple-copy l<strong>in</strong>es<br />
3:1 ≠ 3:1 15:1 ≠<br />
Taipei 309 120 97.0 37.0 54.0 95.0 5.0 52.0 10.0 38.0<br />
Nipponbare 92 99.0 41.0 59.0 83.0 17.0 20.6 0.0 79.4<br />
Table 4. Flank<strong>in</strong>g sequence tags (FSTs) from T-DNA mutant l<strong>in</strong>es found similar to sequences deposited <strong>in</strong> public databases.<br />
FST size Blast N homology Acc. no. Insertion Identity Am<strong>in</strong>o acid homology<br />
(bp) site a (%)<br />
327 O. sativa genomic clone, chr 1 AP001633 Intron 79 Lipase<br />
269 A. thaliana MAP3K alpha prote<strong>in</strong> k<strong>in</strong>ase ATU58918 ORF 94 MAP3K alpha prote<strong>in</strong> k<strong>in</strong>ase<br />
221 A. thaliana EF-1 β2, cds D83726 ORF 95 EF-1 β2<br />
472 O. sativa genomic DNA, chr 4 OSB6015 Intron 85 Putative prote<strong>in</strong><br />
461 Gypsy-type retrotransposon RIRE 8B AB014741.1 – 95 –<br />
>600 O. sativa genomic clone, chr 1 AP001800 5′-UTR 86 Putative lipase<br />
514 O. sativa genomic clone, chr 6 AP000399 ORF 83 Acyl-ACP-thioesterase<br />
>600 O. sativa p34 cdc2 X60374 ORF 97 p34 cdc2<br />
a OPR = open read<strong>in</strong>g frame, UTR = untranslated region.<br />
Isolation and sequenc<strong>in</strong>g of regions adjacent<br />
to T-DNA <strong>in</strong>sertion po<strong>in</strong>ts (FSTs)<br />
To learn more about T-DNA <strong>in</strong>tegration <strong>in</strong>to the genome, isolation<br />
of a large number of FSTs has been done by the PCR<br />
walk<strong>in</strong>g method (Devic et al 1997). This method was selected<br />
for its high reliability and procedural simplicity. A s<strong>in</strong>gle PCR<br />
product had been obta<strong>in</strong>ed from 82 transgenic Taipei 309<br />
samples tested (58%, n = 141) <strong>in</strong> the second PCR runs when<br />
the enzymes EcoRI/DraI or NaeI/SspI had been used. After<br />
elim<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g the T-DNA sequence, an average of 350 bp of the<br />
host genomic DNA was obta<strong>in</strong>ed. In some l<strong>in</strong>es, a large deletion<br />
of the T-DNA right border (up to 120 bp) had been detected.<br />
Us<strong>in</strong>g the blast tool to search <strong>in</strong> the Genbank, 10% of<br />
the FST sequences proved to be identical to the b<strong>in</strong>ary vector,<br />
<strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g that <strong>in</strong> these mutant l<strong>in</strong>es the b<strong>in</strong>ary vector has been<br />
<strong>in</strong>tegrated <strong>in</strong>to the genome with the T-DNA. These data confirmed<br />
results obta<strong>in</strong>ed by hybridization with a probe specific<br />
to the b<strong>in</strong>ary vector backbone (LB out). Isolat<strong>in</strong>g the FSTs for<br />
these l<strong>in</strong>es will be difficult <strong>in</strong> a large-scale procedure. Moreover,<br />
the presence of these l<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong> a reverse genetics screen<br />
would not be useful. A large number of the FSTs did not match<br />
any known sequences <strong>in</strong> the database. We have identified FSTs<br />
that are highly homologous to known genes (Table 4). Four<br />
<strong>in</strong>sertions are located with<strong>in</strong> the exon of the gene, two with<strong>in</strong><br />
the <strong>in</strong>tron, and one <strong>in</strong> the 5′-UTR. These data <strong>in</strong>dicated that<br />
from 80 T-DNA l<strong>in</strong>es at least 8 (10%) conta<strong>in</strong>ed an <strong>in</strong>sertion<br />
with<strong>in</strong> a known gene. Moreover, the expression of half of the<br />
tagged genes was affected by the T-DNA <strong>in</strong>sertion.<br />
Conclusions<br />
The transformation efficiency reported here allows the production<br />
of several thousands of events <strong>in</strong> a s<strong>in</strong>gle coculture<br />
experiment of a few hundred callus pieces. The availability of<br />
a high-throughput transformation procedure permits the creation<br />
of a genome-wide T-DNA <strong>in</strong>sert library <strong>in</strong> rice. Results<br />
also proved that organization of <strong>in</strong>tegrated T-DNA is generally<br />
compatible with recovery and further sequenc<strong>in</strong>g of genomic<br />
regions flank<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>sertion po<strong>in</strong>ts. Large-scale production<br />
of FSTs should be atta<strong>in</strong>able through optimization and<br />
automation of the processes. A major question that rema<strong>in</strong>s is<br />
the number of l<strong>in</strong>es that need to be generated to ensure a genome-wide<br />
coverage of T-DNA <strong>in</strong>serts <strong>in</strong> rice. This has been<br />
estimated to be 100,000–180,000 <strong>in</strong> the Arabidopsis genome<br />
(Krysan et al 1999), which represents one-fourth of that of<br />
rice. A recent study has demonstrated that transgenic rice plants<br />
exhibit <strong>in</strong>tegration of the T-DNA <strong>in</strong>to a compositionally dist<strong>in</strong>ct<br />
DNA fraction represent<strong>in</strong>g transcriptionally active regions<br />
of the genome called the “gene space” (Barakat et al 2000).<br />
As the gene space accounts for only 25% of the rice genome—<br />
compared with 85% <strong>in</strong> Arabidopsis—the number of T-DNA<br />
l<strong>in</strong>es to be generated could be the same <strong>in</strong> the two model species.<br />
References<br />
Barakat A, Gallois P, Raynal M, Mestre-Ortega D, Sallaud C,<br />
Guiderdoni E, Delseny M, Bernardi G. 2000. The distribution<br />
of T-DNA <strong>in</strong> the genomes of transgenic Arabidopsis and<br />
rice. FEBS Lett. 471:161-164.<br />
Genomics 361
Devic M, Albert S, Delseny M, Roscoe TJ. 1997. Efficient PCR<br />
walk<strong>in</strong>g on plant genomic DNA. Plant Physiol. Biochem.<br />
35:331-339.<br />
Enoki H, Izawa T, Kawahara M, Komatsu M, Koh S, Kyozuka J,<br />
Shimamoto K. 1999. Ac as a tool for the functional genomics<br />
of rice. Plant J. 19:605-613.<br />
Hirochika H. 1999. Retrotransposons of rice as a tool for forward<br />
and reverse genetics. In: Shimamoto K, editor. Molecular biology<br />
of rice. Tokyo (Japan): Spr<strong>in</strong>ger-Verlag. p 43-58.<br />
Krysan PJ, Young JC, Sussman MR. 1999. T-DNA as an <strong>in</strong>sertional<br />
mutagen <strong>in</strong> Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 11:2283-2290.<br />
Siebert PD, Chenchick A, Kellogg DE, Lukyanov KA, Lukyanov<br />
SA. 1995. An improved PCR method for walk<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> uncloned<br />
genomic DNA. Nucl. Acids Res. 23:1087-1088.<br />
Y<strong>in</strong> Z, Wang GL. 2000. Evidence of multiple complex patterns of T-<br />
DNA <strong>in</strong>tegration <strong>in</strong>to the rice genome. Theor. Appl. Genet.<br />
100:461-470.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ addresses: C. Sallaud, D. Meynard, M. Bès, C. Gay, E.<br />
Bourgeois, E. Guiderdoni, Génoplante, Biotrop Programme,<br />
Cirad-Amis, Avenue Agropolis, F-34398 Montpellier Cedex<br />
5; J.P. Brizad, Genetrop, Ird, BP5045, 34032 Montpellier<br />
Cedex 01; C. Gay, INRA-ENSAM, 2 Place Viala, F-34060<br />
Montpellier Cedex 01; M. Raynal, M. Delseny, Laboratoire<br />
Génome et Développement des Plantes, UMR5096, CNRS/<br />
UP, 52, Avenue de Villeneuve, F-66860 Perpignan Cedex<br />
France; H. Hoge, <strong>Rice</strong> Research Group, Institute of Molecular<br />
Plant Science, Leiden University, PO Box 9505, 2300 RA<br />
Leiden, The Netherlands.<br />
New Ac/Ds-based constructs for efficient gene and enhancer<br />
trapp<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> rice<br />
X.-R. Zhou, K. Ramm, L. Wu, R. Sivakumar, E.S. Dennis, and N.M. Upahdyaya<br />
We have evaluated Ac/Ds gene and enhancer trapp<strong>in</strong>g constructs and shown that all components except the negative selector<br />
nptII gene work <strong>in</strong> rice. Hygromyc<strong>in</strong> counter selection could identify the possible stable trap l<strong>in</strong>es that did not conta<strong>in</strong> Ac and <strong>in</strong><br />
which Ds had jumped to locations unl<strong>in</strong>ked to their orig<strong>in</strong>al positions. However, high-throughput screen<strong>in</strong>g requires quick and<br />
efficient selection of stable Ds trap l<strong>in</strong>es, l<strong>in</strong>ked or unl<strong>in</strong>ked to their orig<strong>in</strong>al positions, from among the large screen<strong>in</strong>g population.<br />
We have evaluated two negative selectors, tms 2<br />
(iaaH) under the control of the manop<strong>in</strong>e synthase gene 2 promoter from<br />
Agrobacterium tumefaciens and codA driven by the CaMV 35S promoter, for use <strong>in</strong> rice. The former was found to be suitable<br />
for rice and an Ac construct with tms 2<br />
as a negative selector has been employed. In the Ds enhancer and gene trap constructs,<br />
the nptII gene has been replaced with bar as a strong negative selector for Ds. Ds gene and enhancer trap constructs with bar<br />
as a Ds excision marker have also been made. Use of these new constructs will simplify the screen<strong>in</strong>g for stable trap l<strong>in</strong>es.<br />
S<strong>in</strong>ce transposition of the maize transposable element Ac <strong>in</strong><br />
rice, efforts have been made to use either Ac or the two-element<br />
Ac/Ds system for large-scale <strong>in</strong>sertional mutagenesis as<br />
a tool for rice functional genomics. Based on gene density and<br />
genome size, nearly half a million <strong>in</strong>sertion mutants need to be<br />
produced to saturate the rice genome of approximately 430<br />
Mb (Jeon et al 2000). Use of a reporter gene with a m<strong>in</strong>imal<br />
promoter (enhancer trap) or with <strong>in</strong>tron splice acceptors (gene<br />
trap) with tagg<strong>in</strong>g (T-DNA or Ds transposon) sequences facilitates<br />
the “trapp<strong>in</strong>g” of genetic regions that do not have a<br />
visible phenotype. This “trapp<strong>in</strong>g” system has been used effectively<br />
<strong>in</strong> Arabidopsis with the two-element Ac/Ds system<br />
(Sundaresan et al 1995) and is now be<strong>in</strong>g used <strong>in</strong> rice.<br />
We have been evaluat<strong>in</strong>g the Ac/Ds-based gene and enhancer<br />
trapp<strong>in</strong>g constructs orig<strong>in</strong>ally developed for use <strong>in</strong><br />
Arabidopsis (Sundaresan et al 1995) and redesigned for use <strong>in</strong><br />
rice (Kumar and Narayanan 1997). Here, we give an account<br />
of our evaluation of the various components of these constructs<br />
and of the additional features <strong>in</strong>corporated <strong>in</strong> our new constructs<br />
designed for high-throughput mutagenesis and screen<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
Features of currently used constructs<br />
The b<strong>in</strong>ary vector (pCAMBIA1300) carry<strong>in</strong>g Ac conta<strong>in</strong>s the<br />
CaMV 35S promoter-driven hph as a selectable marker and<br />
the Ubi1-TMV omega translational enhancer-driven, 5′ deleted<br />
Ac (immobile Ac). The b<strong>in</strong>ary vector carry<strong>in</strong>g the Ds enhancer<br />
trap, DsE, conta<strong>in</strong>s the same hph and the Ubi1 promoter-driven<br />
sgfpS65T gene as a Ds launch<strong>in</strong>g pad reporter. DsE also conta<strong>in</strong>s<br />
the uidA gene with a m<strong>in</strong>imal promoter (transcriptional<br />
activator) as a trap reporter, manop<strong>in</strong>e synthase 2′ gene promoter-driven<br />
nptII gene as a trap tracer, and the ampicill<strong>in</strong><br />
resistance gene bla with an E. coli orig<strong>in</strong> of replication as a<br />
plasmid rescue system. The DsG construct is the same as DsE,<br />
except that DsG conta<strong>in</strong>s the GPA1 (G-prote<strong>in</strong> α-subunit from<br />
Arabidopsis) <strong>in</strong>tron with triple splice acceptors <strong>in</strong>stead of the<br />
m<strong>in</strong>imal promoter. These constructs (Kumar and Narayanan<br />
1997) were k<strong>in</strong>dly supplied by our collaborators from the SPIC<br />
Science Foundation, Chennai, India. We have used three delivery<br />
methods to produce a large number of Ac/Ds starter<br />
transgenic l<strong>in</strong>es: parallel delivery of Ac and Ds <strong>in</strong>to rice and<br />
subsequent cross<strong>in</strong>g, sequential delivery of Ac and Ds <strong>in</strong>to rice,<br />
362 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
and co-delivery of Ac and Ds <strong>in</strong>to rice. The evaluations of<br />
these constructs are based on results obta<strong>in</strong>ed from the first<br />
screen<strong>in</strong>g population (F 2 of crosses or T 1 of double<br />
transformants).<br />
We have shown that the Ubi1 promoter-driven immobilized<br />
Ac transposase, plant selectable marker hph, plasmid rescue<br />
system, transcriptional activator, GPA1 <strong>in</strong>tron with splice<br />
acceptors, trap reporter gene uidA, and Ds donor site reporter<br />
(Ubi1 P-sgfpS65T) all work efficiently <strong>in</strong> rice. S<strong>in</strong>ce both Ac<br />
and Ds donor loci would have hph, we have explored the possibility<br />
of us<strong>in</strong>g hygromyc<strong>in</strong> spray as a counter selector to identify<br />
Ds stable traps (unl<strong>in</strong>ked to Ac) also unl<strong>in</strong>ked to the Ds<br />
donor site. Transgenic rice plants with the CaMV 35S promoter-driven<br />
hph gene and nontransgenic plants were sprayed<br />
with hygromyc<strong>in</strong> B solution at concentrations of 50, 100, and<br />
150 mg L –1 <strong>in</strong> water conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g 0.05% AGRAL60 (ICI, Australia)<br />
as a wett<strong>in</strong>g agent. Nontransgenic or segregat<strong>in</strong>g null<br />
plants developed necrosis or yellow spots on leaves with<strong>in</strong> 4–<br />
5 d of the treatment, especially at the higher dosages, whereas<br />
hph transgenic plants did not show any obvious symptoms (Fig.<br />
1A). The hygromyc<strong>in</strong> B spray did not permanently affect the<br />
growth and fertility of sensitive plants. Thus, we are able to<br />
use hygromyc<strong>in</strong> spray to identify sensitive progenies as devoid<br />
of Ac and Ds donor sites (stable Ds traps unl<strong>in</strong>ked to the<br />
Ds donor site or null) with reasonable accuracy. However, we<br />
have observed some progeny plants scored as sensitive by<br />
hygromyc<strong>in</strong> spray that conta<strong>in</strong>ed the gene, which could have<br />
become silent.<br />
Modified green fluorescent prote<strong>in</strong> (GFP) genes, such<br />
as mgfp4 and sgfpS65T, have been used <strong>in</strong> rice as a vital reporter<br />
(Upadhyaya et al 2000). The Ds constructs we used<br />
have the Ubi1(I) promoter-driven sgfpS65T and this vital<br />
marker is be<strong>in</strong>g used effectively, not only for monitor<strong>in</strong>g transformation<br />
but also for separat<strong>in</strong>g possible stable traps l<strong>in</strong>ked<br />
to and unl<strong>in</strong>ked from the orig<strong>in</strong>al launch<strong>in</strong>g pad. Although with<br />
the T 1 progeny for most Ds l<strong>in</strong>es GFP expression segregated<br />
normally, we did f<strong>in</strong>d several l<strong>in</strong>es show<strong>in</strong>g abnormal segregation<br />
or complete silenc<strong>in</strong>g of GFP expression. For all cross<strong>in</strong>g<br />
experiments, only Ds l<strong>in</strong>es with a history of normal segregation<br />
were used (Fig. 1B).<br />
Components added to new constructs<br />
We have used transgenic l<strong>in</strong>es with the CaMV 35S promoterdriven<br />
bar gene to work out a spray system. Seedl<strong>in</strong>gs (15–20<br />
d old) were sprayed with 1, 3, 5 and 10 mL L –1 commercial<br />
Basta. Results showed that Basta spray at 5 mL L –1 is lethal to<br />
wild-type control seedl<strong>in</strong>gs, whereas the transgenic plants rema<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
green and grew normally after Basta spray at this rate<br />
(Fig. 1C).<br />
A conditional negative selection marker is also essential<br />
for high-throughput screen<strong>in</strong>g with the two-element transposon<br />
tagg<strong>in</strong>g system. We have demonstrated that tms 2 can be used<br />
as a negative selector <strong>in</strong> rice. T 1 transgenic seedl<strong>in</strong>gs express<strong>in</strong>g<br />
this tms 2 gene under the control of the mas2 promoter<br />
showed a significant reduction <strong>in</strong> shoot and root growth <strong>in</strong> the<br />
A<br />
hph + WT<br />
150 µg hygromyc<strong>in</strong><br />
mL –1<br />
B<br />
C<br />
bar +<br />
WT<br />
5 mL L –1 Basta<br />
B<br />
GFP segregation<br />
tms<br />
+<br />
2 WT<br />
10 µM NAM<br />
Fig. 1. Evaluation of the components for new Ac and Ds constructs.<br />
(A) Detection of hyg s rice seedl<strong>in</strong>gs by hygromyc<strong>in</strong> B spray now<br />
be<strong>in</strong>g used as a counter selector for identify<strong>in</strong>g hyg s plants <strong>in</strong> the<br />
screen<strong>in</strong>g population that can conta<strong>in</strong> only Ds unl<strong>in</strong>ked to Ac and<br />
Ds donor sites (launch<strong>in</strong>g pad) or nulls. (B) Germ<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g T 1 seeds<br />
of a DsG transgenic l<strong>in</strong>e conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g sgfpS65T driven by the Ubi1(I)<br />
promoter at the Ds donor site (orig<strong>in</strong>al T-DNA <strong>in</strong>sertion site) show<strong>in</strong>g<br />
segregation of GFP expression. GFP expression visualized us<strong>in</strong>g<br />
an MZ6 stereomicroscope (Leica Microscopy and Scientific<br />
Instruments) illum<strong>in</strong>ated by a 50-W HP mercury vapor lamp with a<br />
fluorescence GFP-Plus filter set (480/40-nm excitation filter, 505-<br />
nm LP dichromatic mirror, and 510-nm LP barrier filter). Arrows<br />
<strong>in</strong>dicate GFP – null seeds. (C) Transgenic seedl<strong>in</strong>gs conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g a<br />
CaMV 35S promoter-driven bar gene show<strong>in</strong>g resistance to herbicide<br />
Basta spray. (D) tms2 transgenic seeds show<strong>in</strong>g germ<strong>in</strong>ation<br />
<strong>in</strong>hibition <strong>in</strong> the presence of naphthaleneacetamide <strong>in</strong> the germ<strong>in</strong>ation<br />
medium.<br />
presence of 5–10 µM NAM under specified growth conditions<br />
compared with control plants (Fig. 1D). The CaMV 35S promoter-driven<br />
codA did not work efficiently as a negative selector<br />
<strong>in</strong> rice (data not shown) and we are now test<strong>in</strong>g a rice<br />
Act<strong>in</strong>1 (Act1) promoter-driven codA for its suitability as a negative<br />
selector.<br />
Based on the above results, a set of new constructs with<br />
a strong positive selector (bar) for Ds and a negative selector<br />
(tms 2 ) for Ac has been made. With<strong>in</strong> the Ds constructs, the hph<br />
gene is used as a selectable marker for transformation, and,<br />
together with the sgfpS65T gene, for selection as a Ds donor<br />
site (Fig. 2). The procedures for high-throughput screen<strong>in</strong>g of<br />
Ac/Ds starter l<strong>in</strong>e progenies with these new constructs are to<br />
(1) germ<strong>in</strong>ate seeds <strong>in</strong> the presence of 10 mM NAM to remove<br />
the Ac-conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g plants, (2) spray with Basta to kill<br />
D<br />
Genomics 363
Ds with bar as tracer<br />
DsE<br />
i<br />
ii<br />
LB 35S P hph T 3¢ uidA T bar 35SP ori bla 5¢ Ubi P gfp T RB<br />
TA<br />
DsG<br />
LB 35S P hph T 3¢ uidA T bar 35SP ori bla 5¢ Ubi P gfp T RB<br />
SA<br />
Ds with bar excision marker<br />
DsE<br />
iii<br />
iv<br />
LB 35S P 3¢ uidA T ori bla 2¢P nptll T 5¢ bar T 35S P hph(l) T RB<br />
TA<br />
DsG<br />
LB 35S P 3¢ uidA T ori bla 2¢P nptll T 5¢ bar T 35S P hph(l) T RB<br />
SA<br />
Ac transposase constructs<br />
v<br />
LB 2¢P tms 2<br />
T 35S P Ac T 35S P hph T RB<br />
vi<br />
LB Act1 P codA T 35S P Ac T 35S P hph T RB<br />
Fig. 2. New Ac/Ds-based gene constructs. B<strong>in</strong>ary vector (pCAMBIA1300 backbone) constructs with<br />
DsE (i) or DsG (ii) conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g a CaMV 35S promoter-driven bar as a strong positive selector (Ds<br />
tracer); a Ubi1(I) promoter-driven sgfpS65T as a donor site reporter; a CaMV 35S promoter-driven<br />
hph as a selectable marker <strong>in</strong> transformation and as a counter selector <strong>in</strong> screen<strong>in</strong>g for unl<strong>in</strong>ked Ds<br />
trap l<strong>in</strong>es; uidA as the trap reporter; and the ampicill<strong>in</strong> resistance gene bla and an E. coli orig<strong>in</strong> of<br />
replication (ori) for one-step clon<strong>in</strong>g by plasmid rescue. B<strong>in</strong>ary vector (pWBVec8 backbone) constructs<br />
with DsE (iii) or DsG (iv) with bar as an excision marker and a CaMV 35S promoter-driven<br />
<strong>in</strong>tron-<strong>in</strong>terrupted hph. The DsE and DsG shown here are the same as <strong>in</strong> pSK100 and pSK200 constructs<br />
used previously. B<strong>in</strong>ary vectors (pCAMBIA1300 backbone) with a CaMV 35S promoter-driven<br />
5′-deleted Ac transposase, a CaMV 35S promoter-driven hph, and the Act1 promoter-driven codA (v)<br />
or 2′ promoter-driven tms 2 (vi) as negative selectors.<br />
plants devoid of Ds, and (3) spray with hygromyc<strong>in</strong> comb<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
with the GFP score to separate Ds <strong>in</strong>sertions l<strong>in</strong>ked (hph + and/<br />
or GFP + ) and unl<strong>in</strong>ked (hph – and/or GFP – ) to the Ds donor<br />
site (T-DNA tag). This protocol will greatly reduce elaborate<br />
time-consum<strong>in</strong>g DNA extraction and PCR procedures. Ds gene<br />
and enhancer trap constructs with bar as an excision marker<br />
have also been made with a view to trapp<strong>in</strong>g genes l<strong>in</strong>ked to<br />
the Ds donor site. These constructs have already been tested<br />
<strong>in</strong> Arabidopsis (data not shown). We are also us<strong>in</strong>g the super<br />
transformation system (first with the Ac construct, then with<br />
the Ds construct) to produce Ac/Ds starter l<strong>in</strong>es.<br />
References<br />
Jeon J-S, Lee S, Jung K-H, Jun S-H, Jeong D-H, Lee J, Kim C, Jang<br />
S, Lee S, Yang K, Nam J, An K, Han M-J, Sung R-J, Choi H-<br />
S, Yu J-H, Choi J-H, Cho S-Y, Cha S-S, Kim S-I, An G. 2000.<br />
T-DNA <strong>in</strong>sertional mutagenesis for functional genomics <strong>in</strong><br />
rice. Plant J. 22:561-570.<br />
Kumar SC, Narayanan KK. 1997. Gene and enhancer trap constructs<br />
for isolat<strong>in</strong>g genetic regions from rice. <strong>Rice</strong> Biotechnol. Q.<br />
31:17-18.<br />
Sundaresan V, Spr<strong>in</strong>ger P, Volpe T, Haward S, Jones JD, Dean C,<br />
Ma H, Martienssen R. 1995. Patterns of gene action <strong>in</strong> plant<br />
development revealed by enhancer trap and gene trap transposable<br />
elements. Genes Dev. 9:1797-1810.<br />
Upadhyaya NM, Sur<strong>in</strong> B, Ramm K, Gaudron J, Schunmann PHD,<br />
Taylor W, Waterhouse PM, Wang M-B. 2000. Agrobacteriummediated<br />
transformation of Australian rice cultivars Jarrah and<br />
Amaroo us<strong>in</strong>g modified promoters and selectable markers.<br />
Austr. J. Plant Physiol. 27:201-210.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ address: CSIRO Plant Industry, GPO Box 1600 Canberra,<br />
ACT 2601, Australia.<br />
Acknowledgments: We wish to thank S. Kumar, K. Narayanan, and<br />
G. Thomas (SPIC Science Foundation, Chennai, India) for<br />
provid<strong>in</strong>g their Ac and Ds constructs. We are also grateful to<br />
Gra<strong>in</strong>Gene for f<strong>in</strong>ancial support.<br />
364 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
Ac/Ds-mediated gene trap systems for functional<br />
genomics <strong>in</strong> rice<br />
B.I. Je, C.M. Kim, Su Hyun Park, Sung Han Park, Y.J. Na, J.J. Lee, B.G. Oh, N.M. Hee, G.H. Yi, H.Y. Kim, and C.D. Han<br />
We have established Ac/Ds-mediated gene trap systems <strong>in</strong> rice. The efficiency of these gene-tagg<strong>in</strong>g systems has been tested<br />
by produc<strong>in</strong>g transgenic rice plants carry<strong>in</strong>g a simple and s<strong>in</strong>gle T-DNA <strong>in</strong>sert. High Ds mobility and effective gene detection<br />
implied that an Ac/Ds family would be an excellent genetic tool for use <strong>in</strong> functional genomics <strong>in</strong> rice. To produce a large<br />
population of Ds transposants, s<strong>in</strong>gle-copy Ds and Ac “starter” l<strong>in</strong>es were produced. Each Ds starter l<strong>in</strong>e was exam<strong>in</strong>ed for<br />
transposition efficiency by cross<strong>in</strong>g it with an Ac l<strong>in</strong>e. A couple of Ds l<strong>in</strong>es (called Super J) showed that more than 50% of the<br />
F 2<br />
progenies demonstrated germ<strong>in</strong>al transmission of transposed Ds elements.<br />
Even though transposon tagg<strong>in</strong>g/trapp<strong>in</strong>g has proven to be<br />
excellent for diagnos<strong>in</strong>g the function of plant genes (Sundaresan<br />
1996, Martienssen 1998), limited efforts have been made to<br />
identify genes us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>sertional mutagens, especially heterologous<br />
transposons such as the maize Ac/Ds (Izawa et al 1997).<br />
We constructed Ac and enhancer/gene trap Ds vectors and <strong>in</strong>troduced<br />
them <strong>in</strong>to the rice genome by Agrobacterium-mediated<br />
transformation (Hiei et al 1994). The CaMV 35S promoter<br />
was used to express Ac cDNA as a transposase source.<br />
For gene trap Ds, two different <strong>in</strong>trons with three alternative<br />
splic<strong>in</strong>g acceptors were fused to the GUS (Ch<strong>in</strong> et al 1999). A<br />
genetic marker for Ds (BAR) was <strong>in</strong>serted <strong>in</strong>to each trap Ds.<br />
<strong>Rice</strong> plants that conta<strong>in</strong>ed s<strong>in</strong>gle and simple <strong>in</strong>sertions<br />
of T-DNA were analyzed to evaluate gene-tagg<strong>in</strong>g efficiency.<br />
When transgenic plants were produced by <strong>in</strong>troduc<strong>in</strong>g Ac and<br />
Ds <strong>in</strong> a s<strong>in</strong>gle T-DNA vector, nearly 80% of the Ds elements<br />
were excised from the orig<strong>in</strong>al T-DNA <strong>in</strong>sertion sites. Eight<br />
percent of the transposed Ds elements expressed GUS <strong>in</strong> various<br />
tissues of rice panicles. By sequenc<strong>in</strong>g DNA adjacent to<br />
Ds and T-DNA, the efficiency of gene tagg<strong>in</strong>g was evaluated.<br />
The data demonstrated that the Ac/Ds-mediated gene trap system<br />
could be an excellent tool for analyz<strong>in</strong>g gene functions <strong>in</strong><br />
rice (Ch<strong>in</strong> et al 1999).<br />
To perform a large-scale mutagenesis, several homozygous<br />
“starter” l<strong>in</strong>es that carry either a s<strong>in</strong>gle copy of enhancer/<br />
gene trap Ds or a s<strong>in</strong>gle copy of Ac l<strong>in</strong>es were produced. Thirteen<br />
Ds and two Ac starter l<strong>in</strong>es were developed. Western analysis<br />
with Ac antiserum showed the consistent expression of Ac<br />
that has been ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed for several generations (BC 1 F 4 ). The<br />
Ds mobility of each l<strong>in</strong>e was exam<strong>in</strong>ed by cross<strong>in</strong>g the l<strong>in</strong>es to<br />
Ac. The data suggested that Ds mobilities were highly variable<br />
among starter l<strong>in</strong>es that carry a s<strong>in</strong>gle copy of Ds. Based<br />
on studies on Ds locations <strong>in</strong> F 1 and F 2 populations, the follow<strong>in</strong>g<br />
observations can be made:<br />
1. Ds mobility depended on <strong>in</strong>sertion sites.<br />
2. In the presence of Ac expressed by the 35S promoter,<br />
the Ds was more active <strong>in</strong> the ma<strong>in</strong> stalk than <strong>in</strong> tillers<br />
of the same plant.<br />
3. The excision tim<strong>in</strong>g of many Ds was quite late dur<strong>in</strong>g<br />
rice development even though Ac was expressed by a<br />
CaMV 35S promoter.<br />
4. <strong>Rice</strong> plants express<strong>in</strong>g Ac showed slight growth retardation.<br />
Among 15 l<strong>in</strong>es, two showed highly active Ds movement<br />
<strong>in</strong> the F 1 of Ac × Ds. Figures 1 and 2 show the Ds location<br />
<strong>in</strong> F 2 populations. Many Ds were <strong>in</strong>dependently translocated<br />
even <strong>in</strong> the same F 2 progeny. Table 1 lists detailed <strong>in</strong>formation<br />
on Ds movements <strong>in</strong> F 1 and F 2 progenies from two Ds<br />
l<strong>in</strong>es. Our data fully supported the idea that Ac/Ds transposon<br />
tagg<strong>in</strong>g systems are powerful tools for functional genomics<br />
once proper genetic schemes are applied to rice.<br />
References<br />
Ch<strong>in</strong> HG, Choe MS, Lee SH, Park SH, Park SH, Koo JC, Kim NY,<br />
Lee JJ, Oh BG, Yi GH, Kim SC, Choi HC, Cho MJ, Han CD.<br />
1999. Molecular analysis of rice plants harbor<strong>in</strong>g an Ac/Ds<br />
transposable element-mediated gene trapp<strong>in</strong>g system. Plant J.<br />
19:615-624.<br />
Hiei Y, Ohta S, Komari T, Kumashiro T. 1994. Efficient transformation<br />
of rice (Oryza sativa L.) mediated by Agrobacterium and<br />
sequence analysis of the boundaries of the T-DNA. Plant J.<br />
6:271-282.<br />
Izawa T, Ohnishi T, Nakano T, Ishida N, Enoki H, Hashimoto H,<br />
Itoh K, Terada R, Wu C, Miyazaki C, Endo T, Iida S,<br />
Shimamoto K. 1997. Transposon tagg<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> rice. Plant Mol.<br />
Biol. 35:219-229.<br />
Martienssen RA. 1998. Functional genomics: prob<strong>in</strong>g plant gene<br />
function and expression with transposons. Proc. Natl. Acad.<br />
Sci. USA 95:2021-2026.<br />
Sundaresan V. 1996. Horizontal spread of transposon mutagenesis:<br />
new uses for old elements. Trends Plant Sci. 1:184-190.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ addresses: B.I. Je, C.M. Kim, Su Hyun Park, Y.J. Na, and<br />
C.D. Han, Plant Molecular Biology and Biotechnology Research<br />
Center (PMBBRC) and Department of Molecular Biology<br />
(DMB), Gyeongsang National University (GNU),<br />
Ch<strong>in</strong>ju, 660-701; Sung Han Park, PMBBRC, GNU; J.J. Lee,<br />
B.G. Oh, N.M. Hee, G.H. Yi, and H.Y. Kim, YeongNam National<br />
Agricultural Experiment Station, Milyang, 627-130,<br />
Korea.<br />
Genomics 365
GS3<br />
GS7<br />
Fig. 1. Southern analysis of F 2 progenies from <strong>in</strong>dividual F 1 plants<br />
of Ds l<strong>in</strong>e GS3. Ds l<strong>in</strong>e GS3 was crossed with Ac. Subsequent F 1<br />
and F 2 progenies were analyzed by Southern hybridization to exam<strong>in</strong>e<br />
the mobility and transmission of Ds GS3. Each panel represents<br />
the F 2 progenies of a s<strong>in</strong>gle F 1 plant. Each lane shows a<br />
s<strong>in</strong>gle F 2 plant and is shown as a bar on the top of the panels.<br />
Arrows <strong>in</strong>dicate the orig<strong>in</strong>al Ds that resides at T-DNA loci. The transposed<br />
Ds was detected as a bigger DNA fragment than the orig<strong>in</strong>al<br />
Ds on Southern blots, as <strong>in</strong>dicated by brackets. Table 1 summarizes<br />
the analysis of the Ds l<strong>in</strong>e GS3.<br />
Fig. 2. Southern analysis of F 2 progenies from <strong>in</strong>dividual F 1 plants<br />
of Ds l<strong>in</strong>e GS7. F 1 plants of the cross of Ds l<strong>in</strong>e GS7 with Ac and<br />
subsequent F 2 progenies were analyzed by Southern hybridization<br />
to exam<strong>in</strong>e the mobility and transmission of Ds GS7. Each<br />
panel represents F 2 progenies of a s<strong>in</strong>gle F 1 plant. Each lane shows<br />
a s<strong>in</strong>gle F 2 plant and is shown as a bar on the top of the panels.<br />
An arrow <strong>in</strong>dicates the orig<strong>in</strong>al Ds that resides at T-DNA loci. Transposed<br />
Ds are shown <strong>in</strong> brackets. Table 1 summarizes the behavior<br />
of Ds GS7.<br />
Table 1. Ds transposition <strong>in</strong> F 2 derived from the cross of two Ds l<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong><br />
rice.<br />
Population GS3 GS7<br />
F 2 plants/F 1 l<strong>in</strong>es a 105/10 55/5<br />
F 2 plants carry<strong>in</strong>g only orig<strong>in</strong>al Ds 27 (25.7%) 27 (49.1%)<br />
F 2 plants carry<strong>in</strong>g transposed Ds (tDs) 29 (27.6%) 10 (18.2%)<br />
Independent tDs/total tDs <strong>in</strong> F<br />
b 2 31/48 8/12<br />
F 2 plants carry<strong>in</strong>g no Ds (25% is expected) 49 (46.7%) 18 (32.7%)<br />
a<br />
The numbers <strong>in</strong>dicate F 1 plants and their F 2 progenies. b An average of 12 F 2 plants were<br />
exam<strong>in</strong>ed from each F 1 plant. Independent <strong>in</strong>sertions were counted based on polymorphic<br />
fragments hybridized with a Ds-specific probe.<br />
366 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
A rice retrotransposon, Tos17, as a tool for gene tagg<strong>in</strong>g<br />
K. Murata, A. Miyao, K. Tanaka, M. Yamazaki, S. Takeda, K. Abe, K. Onosato, A. Miyazaki, Y. Yamashita, T. Sasaki, and H. Hirochika<br />
A rice retrotransposon, Tos17, possesses unique features: transposition <strong>in</strong>duced by tissue culture, a low copy number (1–4),<br />
high frequency of transposition, result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> 5–30 transposed copies, and random transposition throughout the genome. In<br />
regenerated plants, transposed Tos17 copies are <strong>in</strong>activated. Thus, Tos17 could be used for <strong>in</strong>sertional mutagenesis as a tool<br />
for functional analysis of rice genes. We have constructed a rice mutant panel consist<strong>in</strong>g of more than 30,000 regenerated<br />
knockout l<strong>in</strong>es. Phenotypes of 2,300 l<strong>in</strong>es were <strong>in</strong>vestigated <strong>in</strong> the field us<strong>in</strong>g R 2<br />
segregat<strong>in</strong>g populations. Many k<strong>in</strong>ds of<br />
mutant phenotypes were observed at various stages; about 30% of the l<strong>in</strong>es showed mutant phenotypes on plant morphology<br />
and degree of fertility. Southern blot analysis was performed to identify the specific Tos17 copy cosegregat<strong>in</strong>g with the mutant<br />
phenotype. The results strongly suggested that some mutations, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g narrow leaf, brittle culm, viviparous, stripe, dwarf,<br />
alb<strong>in</strong>o, low fertility, and sterility, were caused by a Tos17 <strong>in</strong>sertion. Genomic sequences correspond<strong>in</strong>g to their mutant loci were<br />
amplified by TAIL-polymerase cha<strong>in</strong> reaction (PCR) or suppression-PCR, cloned, and partially determ<strong>in</strong>ed. A similarity search of<br />
determ<strong>in</strong>ed sequence data suggested that some of them have high similarity to known genes such as genes for cellulose<br />
synthases and transcription factor. The others were new genes such as the gene regulat<strong>in</strong>g leaf width <strong>in</strong> the narrow-leaf mutant.<br />
In Arabidopsis thaliana, the genomic DNA sequence <strong>in</strong>cluded<br />
<strong>in</strong> chromosomes 2 and 4 was completely determ<strong>in</strong>ed, and many<br />
genes were annotated <strong>in</strong> both chromosomes (EU AGP 1998,<br />
L<strong>in</strong> et al 1999). Although a large amount of sequence data <strong>in</strong><br />
various species has been determ<strong>in</strong>ed and published, the practically<br />
expressed functions of genes coded by these sequences<br />
rema<strong>in</strong> mostly ambiguous. Genome research would progress<br />
tremendously if large-scale DNA sequenc<strong>in</strong>g were accompanied<br />
by a gene functional analysis system. In rice, we focused<br />
on an endogenous retrotransposon, Tos17, as one of the strategies<br />
for systematic functional analysis of genes. This element<br />
is activated by tissue culture and becomes <strong>in</strong>active <strong>in</strong> regenerated<br />
plants (Hirochika et al 1996). Tos17-<strong>in</strong>duced mutations<br />
are stably <strong>in</strong>herited <strong>in</strong> subsequent generations. About 5–30<br />
transposed Tos17 copies are normally found, ma<strong>in</strong>ly <strong>in</strong> generich<br />
regions <strong>in</strong> any regenerant l<strong>in</strong>e (Hirochika 1997). This high<br />
frequency of mutation enables us to reduce the number of l<strong>in</strong>es<br />
for screen<strong>in</strong>g for analysis of rice genes.<br />
Materials and methods<br />
A large number of R 1 plants were regenerated follow<strong>in</strong>g tissue<br />
culture of rice cv. Nipponbare. The regenerated plants were<br />
self-poll<strong>in</strong>ated and the mutant phenotype of each l<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> the R 2<br />
generation was <strong>in</strong>vestigated for plant morphology and seed<br />
fertility <strong>in</strong> the field. Southern blot analysis showed that each<br />
of several mutations cosegregates with one Tos17 copy, suggest<strong>in</strong>g<br />
that these mutations were caused by the <strong>in</strong>sertion of<br />
Tos17. To identify causative genes for these mutations, the<br />
specific Tos17-flank<strong>in</strong>g region correspond<strong>in</strong>g to the mutant loci<br />
was amplified by TAIL-PCR (Liu and Whittier 1995) or suppression-PCR<br />
(Siebert et al 1995) and the genomic sequence<br />
of the region was determ<strong>in</strong>ed.<br />
Narrow-leaf gene<br />
Narrow-leaf mutation was identified <strong>in</strong> a regenerant l<strong>in</strong>e,<br />
NC0608. The leaf width of the mutants decreased to 70% of<br />
that of normal plants. Genetic analysis <strong>in</strong> the R 2 showed that<br />
the narrow-leaf mutation was recessive. Genomic Southern blot<br />
analysis showed that this mutation perfectly cosegregated with<br />
one Tos17 copy (Fig. 1). These results strongly suggested that<br />
this mutation was caused by a Tos17 <strong>in</strong>sertion. The genomic<br />
sequence correspond<strong>in</strong>g to the mutant locus was amplified by<br />
TAIL-PCR and the partial sequence was determ<strong>in</strong>ed. This gene<br />
was mapped on chromosome 1, where no narrow-leaf gene<br />
has ever been mapped. The full length of cDNA from the narrow-leaf<br />
gene was partially amplified by PCR screen<strong>in</strong>g of the<br />
library, and 2,468 bp of full sequence was completely determ<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
(Fig. 2). This gene encoded a prote<strong>in</strong> with 690 am<strong>in</strong>o<br />
acids. Homology search aga<strong>in</strong>st a nonredundant DNA database<br />
showed that this deduced am<strong>in</strong>o acid sequence had high<br />
similarity to those of a few hypothetical prote<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong> Arabidopsis<br />
thaliana. This suggested common distribution of this gene<br />
between monocot and dicot plants.<br />
Cellulose synthase<br />
In the segregat<strong>in</strong>g population of the <strong>in</strong>sertion l<strong>in</strong>e NC0259,<br />
the mutant exhibited phenotype as follows: extremely dwarf<br />
growth habit, wither<strong>in</strong>g of the leaf apex dur<strong>in</strong>g growth, and<br />
easy fractur<strong>in</strong>g of the leaf and stem by handl<strong>in</strong>g. This is the socalled<br />
brittle culm phenotype. Also, <strong>in</strong> this l<strong>in</strong>e, the specific<br />
flank<strong>in</strong>g region of the Tos17 copy cosegregat<strong>in</strong>g with the brittle<br />
culm phenotype was identified. The full length of the putative<br />
causative gene of the brittle culm phenotype, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
flank<strong>in</strong>g region, was cloned. The am<strong>in</strong>o acid sequence deduced<br />
from the nucleotide sequence of the cloned gene showed high<br />
similarity to a cellulose synthase of Populus.<br />
Genomics 367
M C mt mt mt mt M C mt mt mt mt<br />
M =λH<strong>in</strong>dll marker<br />
C = Nipponbare<br />
mt = narrow-leaf mutant<br />
Probe: Tos17<br />
Probe: partial region of a flank<strong>in</strong>g<br />
sequence, NC0608_0_102<br />
Fig. 1. Genomic Southern hybridization<br />
analysis on a regenerant<br />
l<strong>in</strong>e, NC0608. Both genomic<br />
Southern blot analyses us<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
partial region of Tos17 and one<br />
of Tos17 flank<strong>in</strong>g sequences as<br />
a probe showed four Tos17 copies<br />
<strong>in</strong>dependently <strong>in</strong>serted <strong>in</strong> the<br />
genome of NC0608 narrow-leaf<br />
mutant l<strong>in</strong>es and suggested that<br />
the mutant phenotype<br />
cosegregated perfectly with one<br />
Tos17 <strong>in</strong>sertion.<br />
Tos17<br />
5¢<br />
3¢<br />
Exon region Intron region Poly(A) site<br />
Tos17 <strong>in</strong>sertion site <strong>in</strong> other regenerants<br />
Fig. 2. The structure of the narrow-leaf gene tagged by Tos17. The full sequence of the tagged narrowleaf<br />
gene was completely determ<strong>in</strong>ed. One Tos17 copy was <strong>in</strong>serted between the 9th and 10th bp<br />
from the 5′ end of the last exon.<br />
Other mutants<br />
One of the alb<strong>in</strong>o mutants observed with high frequency <strong>in</strong> the<br />
mutant panel was suggested to be caused by loss-of-function<br />
of a gene encod<strong>in</strong>g magnesium chelatase (Falbel and Staehel<strong>in</strong><br />
1994). A mutant whose shoot development stopped at the thirdleaf<br />
stage was found. The partial genomic sequence of the<br />
putative causative gene showed that the gene encodes an NAC<br />
doma<strong>in</strong> found <strong>in</strong> no apical meristem (NAM) <strong>in</strong> petunia, cupshaped<br />
cotyledon 2 (CUC2), and NAP <strong>in</strong> A. thaliana. Partial<br />
genomic sequences of putative causative genes for mutations<br />
caus<strong>in</strong>g low fertility or complete sterility showed no similarity<br />
to those of known genes.<br />
To obta<strong>in</strong> f<strong>in</strong>al proof that the cloned genes are really<br />
causative genes for the mutations, molecular complementation<br />
tests should be performed; some are be<strong>in</strong>g carried out for<br />
some mutants. These results suggest that transposon tagg<strong>in</strong>g<br />
us<strong>in</strong>g Tos17 is quite feasible, although further <strong>in</strong>vestigation is<br />
suggested.<br />
References<br />
EU AGP (EU Arabidopsis Genome Project). 1998. Analysis of 1.9<br />
Mb of contiguous sequence from chromosome 4 of<br />
Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature 391:485-488.<br />
Falbel TG, Staehel<strong>in</strong> LA. 1994. Characterization of a family of chlorophyll-deficient<br />
wheat (Triticum) and barley (Hordeum<br />
vulgare) mutants with defects <strong>in</strong> the magnesium-<strong>in</strong>sertion step<br />
of chlorophyll biosynthesis. Plant Physiol. 104:639-648.<br />
Hirochika H. 1997. Retrotransposons of rice: their regulation and<br />
use for genome analysis. Plant Mol. Biol. 35:231-240.<br />
Hirochika H, Sugimoto K, Otsuki Y, Tsugawa H, Kanda M. 1996.<br />
Retrotransposons of rice <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> mutations <strong>in</strong>duced by<br />
tissue culture. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93:7783-7788.<br />
L<strong>in</strong> X et al. 1999. Sequence and analysis of chromosome 2 of the<br />
plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature 402:761-768.<br />
Liu Y-G, Whittier RF. 1995. Thermal asymmetric <strong>in</strong>terlaced PCR:<br />
automatable amplification and sequenc<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>in</strong>sert end fragment<br />
from P1 and YAC clones for chromosomal walk<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
Genomics 25:674-681.<br />
Siebert PD, Chenchik A, Kellogg DE, Lukyanov KA, Lukyanov SA.<br />
1995. An improved PCR method for walk<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> uncloned<br />
genomic DNA. Nucl. Acids Res. 23:1087-1088.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ addresses: K. Murata, K. Tanaka, K. Onosato, and Y.<br />
Yamashita, Institute of the Society for Techno-<strong>in</strong>novation of<br />
Agriculture, Forestry, and Fisheries, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-<br />
0854, Japan; A. Miyao, M. Yamazaki, S. Takeda, K. Abe, A.<br />
Miyazaki, T. Sasaki, and H. Hirochika, National Institute of<br />
Agrobiological Resources, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8602, Japan.<br />
368 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
Structural polymorphism found <strong>in</strong> RMU1<br />
(rice mutator class 1) transposable elements <strong>in</strong> rice<br />
K. Miura, R. Ishikawa, Y. Miyashita, M. Senda, S. Akada, T. Harada, and M. Niizeki<br />
<strong>Rice</strong> Mutator is an element homologous to a maize Mutator transposable element. An RMu family consists of two classes,<br />
RMu1 and RMu2. The RMu1 elements carry a predicted transposase gene designated as rmuA. rmuA shares high homology to<br />
the transposase gene of the regulatory element MuDR of the Mutator family. The homologous part found <strong>in</strong> the genes corresponded<br />
to the part of a putative transposase region that was conserved from bacteria to higher plants. We have already cloned<br />
several members of the RMu1 class. RMu1-IR36, RMu1-435, RMu1-A1a, RMu1-A1b, and RMu1-A23 carried homologous<br />
term<strong>in</strong>al <strong>in</strong>verted repeats, 193 bp <strong>in</strong> size. A possible regulatory element <strong>in</strong> RMu1 is RMu1-136. We are also clon<strong>in</strong>g a<br />
counterpart of the possible autonomous element from japonica stra<strong>in</strong>s. Japonica stra<strong>in</strong>s revealed transcription of the transposase<br />
gene, but <strong>in</strong>dica stra<strong>in</strong>s showed transcription under a particular condition. We are also specify<strong>in</strong>g the specific regulation of the<br />
transcription found <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>dica stra<strong>in</strong>s.<br />
<strong>Rice</strong> Mutator is an element homologous to a maize Mutator<br />
transposable element. The RMu family consists of two classes,<br />
RMu1 and RMu2. The Rmu element carries a predicted gene,<br />
rmuA. rmuA shares high homology to the transposase gene of<br />
the maize Mutator transposable element. Several RMu elements<br />
were cloned with the transposase gene as a probe. The longest<br />
element is RMu1-IR36. Four partial-deletion derivatives were<br />
RMu1-435, RMu1-A1a, RMu1-A1b, and RMu1-A23. All of<br />
them carried homologous term<strong>in</strong>al <strong>in</strong>verted repeats (TIRs) and<br />
the common <strong>in</strong>ternal sequence. Japonica stra<strong>in</strong>s revealed cont<strong>in</strong>uous<br />
transcription of the transposase gene, but <strong>in</strong>dica stra<strong>in</strong>s<br />
were tightly regulated for the transcription. Their structural<br />
differences are affected by different expression patterns.<br />
Sequence variation <strong>in</strong> the RMu1 class<br />
The RMu transposable elements have several subfamilies such<br />
as the maize Mutator family. One of the families, RMu1, was<br />
def<strong>in</strong>ed as an autonomous class. Each member of the class<br />
carries a s<strong>in</strong>gle rmuA gene, with a putative transposase doma<strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>in</strong>side. The RMu2 class largely <strong>in</strong>cludes two k<strong>in</strong>ds of<br />
subfamilies. The first subfamily consists of deletion derivatives<br />
from RMu1 elements. The second consists of elements<br />
carry<strong>in</strong>g unrelated <strong>in</strong>ternal sequences with long TIRs reveal<strong>in</strong>g<br />
lower homology than other TIRs.<br />
RMu1-IR36 was the first clone obta<strong>in</strong>ed from an <strong>in</strong>dica<br />
stra<strong>in</strong>, IR36. Another <strong>in</strong>dica stra<strong>in</strong>, ACC435, carries a deletion<br />
derivative, RMu1-435. The deletion derivative was cloned<br />
from genomic libraries of ACC435. The deletion derivative<br />
lost the 5′ upstream region of the <strong>in</strong>ternal sequence where a<br />
promoter sequence of the rmuA gene existed.<br />
Other RMu1 elements were cloned from japonica stra<strong>in</strong>s.<br />
The A1 (Akage) stra<strong>in</strong> of japonica rice is exceptional <strong>in</strong> produc<strong>in</strong>g<br />
mutants; dwarf 1, dwarf 2, undulated rachis 1, awn 1,<br />
and awn 2 are among such mutants (unpublished breed<strong>in</strong>g histories,<br />
Plant Breed<strong>in</strong>g Institute, Faculty of Agriculture,<br />
Hokkaido University). We have cloned two RMu1 elements,<br />
RMu1-A1a and RMu1-A1b, from genomic libraries of the A1<br />
stra<strong>in</strong>, which revealed cont<strong>in</strong>uous expression of the rmuA gene.<br />
Long polymerase cha<strong>in</strong> reaction (PCR) by us<strong>in</strong>g LA-Taq supplied<br />
by Takara Co. was also tried to clone entire elements<br />
from japonica genomic DNA. The genomic DNA of A23,<br />
which is a derivative stra<strong>in</strong> from A1, was used as the PCR<br />
template. Then, RMu1-A23 was cloned as a 4.1-kb product.<br />
The product was cloned <strong>in</strong>to pBluescript KS + at the T-added<br />
blunt end. These elements were sequenced and compared with<br />
RMu1-IR36 (Fig. 1). In contrast to RMu1-435, the RMu1 members<br />
<strong>in</strong> the japonica genomic background have a smaller deletion<br />
at the 5′ upstream region of the rmuA gene.<br />
Intron<br />
rmuA<br />
Intron<br />
RMu1-IR36<br />
RMu1-435<br />
RMu1-A1a<br />
RMu1-A1b<br />
RMu1-A23<br />
TIR<br />
–267 bp<br />
–135 bp<br />
+15 bp +18 bp<br />
TIR<br />
–154 bp<br />
–6 bp –7 bp<br />
+27 bp +25 bp<br />
–154 bp<br />
–6 bp –7 bp<br />
–18 bp<br />
Fig. 1. Structural differences<br />
found <strong>in</strong> RMu elements. TIR<br />
= term<strong>in</strong>al <strong>in</strong>verted repeats;<br />
deletions and additions are<br />
designated by vertical bars<br />
and triangles.<br />
Genomics 369
Expression of the rmuA gene<br />
Constitutive expression of the rmuA gene was confirmed <strong>in</strong><br />
japonica stra<strong>in</strong>s. However, <strong>in</strong>dica stra<strong>in</strong>s have not shown the<br />
expression. When IR36 was exposed to stress conditions (chill<strong>in</strong>g)<br />
at regular <strong>in</strong>tervals, the expression was activated. The difference<br />
<strong>in</strong> expression patterns observed between two varietal<br />
groups is attributed to sequence differences. The excess expression<br />
of transposase genes could severely damage the host.<br />
Tight regulation found <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>dica stra<strong>in</strong> or po<strong>in</strong>t mutations<br />
found <strong>in</strong>side genes <strong>in</strong> japonica-orig<strong>in</strong>ated RMu1 elements<br />
would be critical for RMu elements to survive <strong>in</strong> the rice genome.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ addresses: K. Miura, R. Ishikawa, Y. Miyashita, T. Harada,<br />
and M. Niizeki, Faculty of Agriculture Life Science, Hirosaki<br />
University; M. Senda and S. Akada, Gene Research Center,<br />
Hirosaki University, Hirosaki 036-8561, Japan.<br />
Isolat<strong>in</strong>g and characteriz<strong>in</strong>g cold-responsive<br />
gene-trapped l<strong>in</strong>es from rice<br />
S.C. Lee, S.H. Kim, S.J. Kim, H.S. Choi, M.Y. Lee, J.Y. Kim, K. Lee, S.H. Jeon, J.S. Jeon, G. An, and S.R. Kim<br />
To understand the low-temperature response mechanism <strong>in</strong> plants, β-glucuronidase (GUS) gene-trapped rice plants were<br />
screened for cold <strong>in</strong>ducibility. Among 6,286 l<strong>in</strong>es, 58 (0.9%) showed differential GUS activity by 5 °C treatment compared with<br />
control plants or those exposed to wound<strong>in</strong>g treatment. Of the 58 l<strong>in</strong>es, 15 were also responsive to abscisic acid (ABA),<br />
suggest<strong>in</strong>g that the cold <strong>in</strong>duction of those l<strong>in</strong>es may be through the ABA-dependent pathway. It is expected that the cold<strong>in</strong>duced<br />
l<strong>in</strong>es conta<strong>in</strong> the gus gene with<strong>in</strong> the cold-responsive genes. Characterization of the tagged genes would give <strong>in</strong>sights<br />
<strong>in</strong>to the cold-response mechanism <strong>in</strong> rice.<br />
When exposed to low temperatures, plants respond with a series<br />
of changes <strong>in</strong> the patterns of gene transcripts and prote<strong>in</strong><br />
products. These changes have an effect on the distribution and<br />
survival of plants, as well as on crop yield, worldwide. Many<br />
plants of tropical or subtropical orig<strong>in</strong> are <strong>in</strong>jured or killed by<br />
nonfreez<strong>in</strong>g low temperature, show<strong>in</strong>g various chill<strong>in</strong>g-<strong>in</strong>jury<br />
symptoms such as chlorosis, necrosis, and growth retardation.<br />
In contrast, cold-tolerant plants are able to grow at nonfreez<strong>in</strong>g<br />
low temperatures. Several genes <strong>in</strong>ducible by low temperature<br />
have been isolated from many plant species (Cattivelli<br />
and Bartels 1990, Weretilnyk et al 1993). Most of the research<br />
has focused on characteriz<strong>in</strong>g the regulatory mechanism of<br />
the genes (Yamaguchi-Sh<strong>in</strong>ozaki and Sh<strong>in</strong>ozaki 1994, Wang<br />
et al 1995). Furthermore, several results also suggest that there<br />
are at least two regulatory pathways, which are ABA-dependent<br />
and ABA-<strong>in</strong>dependent (Yamaguchi-Sh<strong>in</strong>ozaki and<br />
Sh<strong>in</strong>ozaki 1994). Analysis of the promoters of some cold-<strong>in</strong>duced<br />
genes has provided valuable <strong>in</strong>formation on the transcriptional<br />
regulation of the genes.<br />
Mutant analysis has been a powerful method for understand<strong>in</strong>g<br />
stress-responsive mechanisms and can thus be used<br />
for characteriz<strong>in</strong>g chill<strong>in</strong>g tolerance. Populations of<br />
mutagenized plants have been used for screen<strong>in</strong>g the chill<strong>in</strong>grelated<br />
mutants, and diverse processes such as organelle biogenesis<br />
and cell metabolism have been found to be related to<br />
some chill<strong>in</strong>g-tolerance responses (Hugly et al 1990, Tokuhisa<br />
et al 1997).<br />
All modern cultivars of rice are known to orig<strong>in</strong>ate from<br />
a tropical or subtropical progenitor and no known cold-resistant<br />
wild rice has been reported. <strong>Rice</strong> is adversely affected by<br />
cold. Poor seedl<strong>in</strong>g vigor, poor fertility, and, consequently,<br />
reduced yields have been related to cold stress, which is dependent<br />
on the developmental stage. To understand the coldresponse<br />
mechanism, we have screened 6,286 GUS genetrapped<br />
transgenic l<strong>in</strong>es of rice plants. About 1% of the<br />
transgenic l<strong>in</strong>es were shown to be differentially regulated by 5<br />
°C and some related results are presented.<br />
Methods<br />
Shoot fragments of young tillers from GUS gene-trapped T 0<br />
plants (Jeon et al 2000) were <strong>in</strong>cubated <strong>in</strong> MS medium at 5 °C<br />
overnight and sta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> X-glucsolution. GUS sta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g was<br />
exam<strong>in</strong>ed under a dissect<strong>in</strong>g microscope and the GUS-positive<br />
l<strong>in</strong>es were selected. The selected l<strong>in</strong>es were further<br />
screened with 5 °C treatment, wound<strong>in</strong>g (26 °C), and ABA<br />
(100 µM) treatments for 12 h. The GUS assay and isolation of<br />
the sequence flank<strong>in</strong>g the GUS gene were performed accord<strong>in</strong>g<br />
to Jeon et al (2000).<br />
Results and discussion<br />
To screen for cold <strong>in</strong>ducibility, 6,286 transgenic l<strong>in</strong>es were<br />
treated exposed to 5 °C treatment overnight. Several hundred<br />
l<strong>in</strong>es were shown to be GUS-positive and were subjected to a<br />
370 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
Treatment<br />
conditions<br />
L<strong>in</strong>e no.<br />
Control 26 ºC<br />
5 ºC<br />
treatment<br />
treatment<br />
ABA<br />
treatment<br />
14822<br />
16466<br />
15167<br />
23051<br />
14801<br />
14818<br />
Fig. 1. Analysis of GUS activity <strong>in</strong> shoots of GUS<br />
gene-trapped transgenic rice plants. GUS genetrapped<br />
transgenic rice was exam<strong>in</strong>ed for <strong>in</strong>ducibility<br />
by cold or ABA stresses. Young shoots of T 0<br />
plants were cut <strong>in</strong>to small pieces and exposed to<br />
26 °C, 5 °C, and ABA (100 µM) treatments for 12 h.<br />
After the treatments, the shoot segments were<br />
sta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> X-glucsolution. GUS activity was measured<br />
and photographed under a dissect<strong>in</strong>g microscope.<br />
The GUS sta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g of l<strong>in</strong>es #14822, #16466,<br />
and #15167 was <strong>in</strong>duced only by 5 °C treatment,<br />
whereas that of l<strong>in</strong>e #23051 was <strong>in</strong>duced by both<br />
5 °C and ABA treatments. Also, l<strong>in</strong>es #14801 and<br />
#14818 showed constitutive GUS sta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g and were<br />
up-regulated by the 5 °C treatment. The GUS sta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />
of l<strong>in</strong>e #14822 was localized <strong>in</strong> the pith; l<strong>in</strong>es<br />
#16466, #23051, and #14818 <strong>in</strong> the stems but<br />
not <strong>in</strong> the leaf sheath; l<strong>in</strong>es #15167 and #14801<br />
<strong>in</strong> all regions of the shoot fragments.<br />
second screen<strong>in</strong>g, along with a control and the same wound<strong>in</strong>g<br />
and ABA treatments. F<strong>in</strong>ally, 58 l<strong>in</strong>es (0.9%) showed differential<br />
GUS activity by cold treatment compared with either<br />
the control or wounded plants. Although 51 of the 58 l<strong>in</strong>es<br />
showed <strong>in</strong>creased GUS sta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g, the other seven l<strong>in</strong>es showed<br />
decreased sta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g. Representative results from the <strong>in</strong>creased<br />
GUS sta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g by cold temperature are shown <strong>in</strong> Figure 1. The<br />
cold-<strong>in</strong>duction pattern of the gus gene was categorized <strong>in</strong>to<br />
three classes. The first class consisted of l<strong>in</strong>es that showed<br />
<strong>in</strong>duced GUS sta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g only by 5 °C treatment (Fig. 1; #14822,<br />
#16466, and #15167), and this class was most frequently observed.<br />
The second class consisted of l<strong>in</strong>es that showed <strong>in</strong>duced<br />
GUS sta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g by both 5 °C and ABA treatments (Fig. 1;<br />
#23051), and 15 of the 58 l<strong>in</strong>es belonged to this class. The<br />
cold-<strong>in</strong>duction pattern of this class suggests that the cold-<strong>in</strong>duction<br />
pathway may be through ABA. The third class consisted<br />
of l<strong>in</strong>es that showed up-regulated GUS sta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g by 5 °C<br />
treatment (Fig. 1; #14801 and #14818). The l<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong> this class<br />
showed constitutive GUS activity and the GUS activity was<br />
further <strong>in</strong>creased by 5 °C treatment.<br />
The GUS sta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g pattern <strong>in</strong> various regions of the shoot<br />
fragment was exam<strong>in</strong>ed as well. Sta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g was localized <strong>in</strong> the<br />
piths (Fig. 1; #14822), <strong>in</strong> the stems (Fig. 1; #16466, #23051,<br />
and #14818), or <strong>in</strong> all regions of shoot fragments, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g<br />
the leaf sheaths (Fig. 1; #15167 and #14801). These results<br />
suggest that a change <strong>in</strong> GUS sta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g of these 58 l<strong>in</strong>es is affected<br />
not only by cold treatment but also by tissue type.<br />
It is expected that these l<strong>in</strong>es conta<strong>in</strong> the gus gene with<strong>in</strong><br />
the cold-responsive genes of the rice genome. Currently, the<br />
tagged genes of these significant l<strong>in</strong>es are be<strong>in</strong>g cloned by thermal<br />
asymmetric <strong>in</strong>terlaced (TAIL)-polymerase cha<strong>in</strong> reaction<br />
(PCR) or the <strong>in</strong>verse PCR method. Characterization of the<br />
tagged genes will give <strong>in</strong>sights <strong>in</strong>to the cold-response mechanism<br />
<strong>in</strong> rice.<br />
Reference<br />
Cattivelli L, Bartels D. 1990. Molecular clon<strong>in</strong>g and characterization<br />
of cold-regulated genes <strong>in</strong> barley. Plant Physiol. 93:1504-<br />
1510.<br />
Hugly S, McCourt P, Browse J, Patterson GW, Somerville C. 1990.<br />
A chill<strong>in</strong>g sensitive mutant of Arabidopsis with altered sterylester<br />
metabolism. Plant Physiol. 93:1053-1062.<br />
Jeon JS, Lee S, Jung KH, Jun SH, Jeong DH, Lee J, Kim C, Jang S,<br />
Lee S, Yang K, Nam J, An K, Han MJ, Sung RJ, Choi HS, Yu<br />
JH, Choi JH, Cho SY, Cha SS, Kim SI, An G. 2000. T-DNA<br />
<strong>in</strong>sertional mutagenesis for functional genomics <strong>in</strong> rice. Plant<br />
J. 22:561-570.<br />
Tokuhisa JG, Feldmann KA, Labrie ST, Browse J. 1997. Mutational<br />
analysis of chill<strong>in</strong>g tolerance <strong>in</strong> plants. Plant Cell Environ.<br />
20:1391-1400.<br />
Wang H, Datla R, Georges F, Loewen M, Cutler AJ. 1995. Promoters<br />
from k<strong>in</strong>1 and cor6.6, two homologous Arabidopsis<br />
thaliana genes: transcriptional regulation and gene expression<br />
<strong>in</strong>duced by low temperature, ABA, osmoticum and dehydration.<br />
Plant Mol. Biol. 28:605-617.<br />
Genomics 371
Weretilnyk E, Orr W, White TC, Iu B, S<strong>in</strong>gh J. 1993. Characterization<br />
of three related low-temperature-regulated cDNAs from<br />
w<strong>in</strong>ter Brassica napus. Plant Physiol. 101:171-177.<br />
Yamaguchi-Sh<strong>in</strong>ozaki K, Sh<strong>in</strong>ozaki K. 1994. A novel cis-act<strong>in</strong>g element<br />
<strong>in</strong> an Arabidopsis gene is <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> responsiveness<br />
to drought, low-temperature, or high salt stress. Plant Cell<br />
6:251-264.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ addresses: S.C. Lee, S.H. Kim, S.J. Kim, H.S. Choi, M.Y.<br />
Lee, J.Y. Kim, K. Lee, S.R. Kim, Department of Life Science,<br />
Sogang University, Seoul 121-742, Republic of Korea;<br />
S.H. Jeon, J.S. Jeon, G. An, Division of Molecular and Life<br />
Science, Pohang University of Science and Technology,<br />
Pohang 790-784, Republic of Korea.<br />
Construct<strong>in</strong>g a physical map of the rice genome<br />
A.C. Sanchez, B. Fu, R. Maghirang, C. Aqu<strong>in</strong>o, J. Mendoza, J. Talag, S. Yu, J.R. Dom<strong>in</strong>go, K.L. McNally, P. Bagali, G.S. Khush, and Z.K. Li<br />
An effort was made to construct physical maps for <strong>in</strong>dividual rice chromosomes us<strong>in</strong>g the IR64 bacterial artificial chromosome<br />
(BAC) library. The strategy for physical map construction <strong>in</strong>volved three steps. First, the IR64 BAC library was screened with<br />
anchor restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) and sequence-tagged site (STS) markers to establish anchor BAC<br />
islands across the genome. More than 400 RFLP and STS markers were used to screen the library. These markers identified<br />
more than 1,000 anchor BAC clones. Second, the expected gaps between the anchor BAC contigs were filled by random<br />
chromosome land<strong>in</strong>g. In do<strong>in</strong>g so, three-dimensional DNA pools prepared from the whole library were amplified with large<br />
numbers of random primers to generate random BAC islands for gap fill<strong>in</strong>g. More than 200 random primers were used to<br />
screen the BAC DNA pools, result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> more than 500 random BAC islands. Assignment of these random BAC islands to<br />
<strong>in</strong>dividual chromosomes was simultaneously conducted by genetic mapp<strong>in</strong>g and/or by hitt<strong>in</strong>g anchor BAC islands. Third, the<br />
whole BAC library was f<strong>in</strong>gerpr<strong>in</strong>ted and BAC contigs were assembled based on f<strong>in</strong>gerpr<strong>in</strong>ts of <strong>in</strong>dividual BAC clones us<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
computer software, IMAGE and FPC from the Sanger Centre (www.sanger.ac.uk/Software). BAC contigs have been assembled<br />
cover<strong>in</strong>g a significant portion of the rice genome. Physical maps for chromosomes 11 and 12 have been constructed. The<br />
overlapp<strong>in</strong>g BAC contigs and PCR-based markers provide useful materials for genome mapp<strong>in</strong>g and molecular clon<strong>in</strong>g of<br />
important rice genes and QTLs.<br />
A physical map of a chromosome or genome is def<strong>in</strong>ed as a<br />
series of ordered, contiguous DNA clones spann<strong>in</strong>g the entire<br />
chromosome or genome and measured <strong>in</strong> the number of base<br />
pairs of DNA. To date, most structural genomic efforts have<br />
focused on the genome of a s<strong>in</strong>gle japonica variety, Nipponbare.<br />
However, the presence of two well-differentiated genomes, the<br />
<strong>in</strong>dica and japonica with<strong>in</strong> rice, has been well documented. In<br />
contrast to its much wider adaptation and grow<strong>in</strong>g areas, <strong>in</strong>dica<br />
has received m<strong>in</strong>imal attention <strong>in</strong> structural genomics. To<br />
capture <strong>in</strong>formation from genomic research on the japonica<br />
genome and to achieve more efficient gene discovery, rice functional<br />
genomics for large-scale gene discovery and function<br />
assignment has emerged as an important research area <strong>in</strong> rice.<br />
At <strong>IRRI</strong>, efforts are be<strong>in</strong>g made to identify and map a large<br />
number of important rice genes/quantitative trait loci us<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
near-isogenic IR64 <strong>in</strong>trogression l<strong>in</strong>es. To facilitate this effort<br />
for gene discovery and allelic m<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g, we are also construct<strong>in</strong>g<br />
a physical map of the <strong>in</strong>dica genome us<strong>in</strong>g the IR64 bacterial<br />
artificial chromosome (BAC) library developed at <strong>IRRI</strong>.<br />
We are construct<strong>in</strong>g a physical map of the rice genome.<br />
The physical map of IR64 obta<strong>in</strong>ed can be compared with the<br />
available, developed physical map of japonica rice cultivar<br />
Nipponbare to elucidate aspects of rice genome evolution and<br />
rice chromosomal structure.<br />
Materials and methods<br />
Our strategy for physical map construction <strong>in</strong>volved three generalized<br />
steps: (1) establish<strong>in</strong>g anchor BAC islands across the<br />
genome, (2) gap fill<strong>in</strong>g by chromosome land<strong>in</strong>g, and (3) assembl<strong>in</strong>g<br />
the BAC islands <strong>in</strong>to BAC contigs by H<strong>in</strong>dIII f<strong>in</strong>gerpr<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
The IR64 BAC library (Yang et al 1997) was screened<br />
with genetically mapped DNA markers (Causse et al 1994,<br />
Harushima et al 1998) to establish the anchor BAC islands<br />
across the genome. Mapped restriction fragment length polymorphism<br />
(RFLP) markers were used to screen the BAC library<br />
by colony hybridization of high-density colony filters<br />
with RFLP markers, as described by Yang et al (1997), with<br />
m<strong>in</strong>or modifications. For polymerase cha<strong>in</strong> reaction (PCR)-<br />
based anchor markers, plate, row, and column pools were amplified<br />
us<strong>in</strong>g PCR primers accord<strong>in</strong>g to protocols described<br />
by Xu et al (1998).<br />
The three-dimensional DNA pools prepared from the<br />
whole library were amplified with large numbers of random<br />
amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) primers to produce random<br />
BAC islands. Assignment of these random BAC islands<br />
to <strong>in</strong>dividual chromosomes was simultaneously conducted by<br />
genetic mapp<strong>in</strong>g and by hitt<strong>in</strong>g anchor BAC islands.<br />
372 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
Table 1. Chromosomal distribution of anchor BAC islands <strong>in</strong> rice.<br />
Chromosome RFLP STS RAPD Total Total Av no. of<br />
number markers markers markers no. of no. of clones/markers<br />
(no.) (no.) (no.) markers clones<br />
1 20 16 7 43 122 2.8<br />
2 12 12 8 32 78 2.8<br />
3 46 7 7 60 162 2.7<br />
4 51 11 2 64 133 2.1<br />
5 41 14 6 61 175 2.9<br />
6 15 12 9 36 101 2.8<br />
7 4 9 2 15 56 3.7<br />
8 13 8 – 21 40 1.9<br />
9 12 8 5 25 76 3.0<br />
10 6 5 4 15 43 2.9<br />
11 64 13 34 111 438 3.9<br />
12 84 4 5 93 419 4.4<br />
Total 368 119 89 576 1,843 3.2<br />
BAC clones form<strong>in</strong>g a BAC island identified through<br />
colony hybridization and random chromosome land<strong>in</strong>g underwent<br />
Southern hybridization analysis to confirm their overlaps.<br />
Insert sizes of the BAC clones were determ<strong>in</strong>ed by pulsefield<br />
gel electrophoresis. To extend the contigs, entire BAC<br />
clones at both ends of the contigs were used as probes to screen<br />
the BAC library for a step of chromosome walk<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
For the rest of the rice chromosomes, computer software<br />
programs analyz<strong>in</strong>g the H<strong>in</strong>dIII f<strong>in</strong>gerpr<strong>in</strong>ts were used. The<br />
IMAGE and FPC programs (Sanger Centre, www.sanger.ac.uk)<br />
automatically assemble contigs based on scanned images of<br />
gel restriction patterns.<br />
Results and discussion<br />
A total of 488 RFLP and STS markers have been used to screen<br />
the BAC library. We have also tested 498 RAPD primers for<br />
screen<strong>in</strong>g the BAC library. To date, we have used 262 RAPD<br />
primers to screen the library and a total of 614 BAC islands<br />
consist<strong>in</strong>g of 1,600 clones were identified by RAPD analysis.<br />
Eighty-n<strong>in</strong>e of the 614 BAC islands identified by RAPD primers<br />
were localized to respective chromosomes by hitt<strong>in</strong>g clones<br />
belong<strong>in</strong>g to the anchor BAC islands. Hence, a total of 576<br />
islands consist<strong>in</strong>g of more than 1,800 clones have been assigned<br />
to the different chromosomes, with an average of 3.3<br />
BAC clones identified by each marker (Table 1). This average<br />
agrees with the size of the BAC library—3.28 genome equivalents.<br />
Figure 1 shows the distribution of the identified BAC<br />
clones along the length of chromosome 11. The framework<br />
physical map for chromosome 11 was developed us<strong>in</strong>g 64<br />
RFLP, 13 STS, and 12 microsatellite markers. Anchor BAC<br />
islands were further augmented by the 34 random BAC islands<br />
from RAPD analysis. All these markers identified a total<br />
of 438 clones, cover<strong>in</strong>g approximately 60% of chromosome<br />
11.<br />
The coverage of the whole physical map of chromosome<br />
12 is 16 Mb or about 52% of chromosome 12. A total of 84<br />
RFLP, 4 STS, and 6 microsatellite markers were used, produc<strong>in</strong>g<br />
59 contigs with a total of 419 BAC clones. We are<br />
undertak<strong>in</strong>g a large-scale automated f<strong>in</strong>gerpr<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g of BAC<br />
clones belong<strong>in</strong>g to the rest of the rice chromosomes.<br />
References<br />
Causse MA, Fulton TM, Cho YG, Ahn SN, Chunwongse J, Wu K,<br />
Xiao J, Yu Z, Ronald PC, Harr<strong>in</strong>gton SE, Second G, McCouch<br />
SR, Tanksley SD. 1994. Saturated molecular map of the genome<br />
based on an <strong>in</strong>terspecific backcross population. <strong>Genetics</strong><br />
138:1251-1274.<br />
Harushima Y, Yano M, Shomura A, Sato M, Shimano T, Kuboki Y,<br />
Yamamoto T, L<strong>in</strong> AY, Antonio B, Parco A, Kajiya H, Huang<br />
N, Yamamoto K, Nagamura Y, Kurata N, Khush GS, Sasaki<br />
T. 1998. A high-density rice genetic l<strong>in</strong>kage map with 2275<br />
markers us<strong>in</strong>g a s<strong>in</strong>gle F 2 population. <strong>Genetics</strong> 148:479-494.<br />
Xu J, Yang D, Dom<strong>in</strong>go J, Ni J, Huang N. 1998. Screen<strong>in</strong>g for overlapp<strong>in</strong>g<br />
bacterial artificial chromosome clones by PCR analysis<br />
with an arbitrary primer. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA<br />
95:5661-5666.<br />
Yang D, Parco A, Nandi S, Subudhi P, Zhu Y, Wang G, Huang N.<br />
1997. Construction of a bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC)<br />
library and identification of overlapp<strong>in</strong>g BAC clones with<br />
chromosome 4-specific RFLP markers <strong>in</strong> rice. Theor. Appl.<br />
Genet. 95:1147-1154.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ addresses: A.C. Sanchez, R. Maghirang, C. Aqu<strong>in</strong>o, J.<br />
Mendoza, J. Talag, S. Yu, J.R. Dom<strong>in</strong>go, K.L. McNally, P.<br />
Bagali, G.S. Khush, and Z.K. Li, Plant Breed<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>Genetics</strong>,<br />
and Biochemistry Division, <strong>International</strong> <strong>Rice</strong> Research Institute,<br />
Los Baños, Philipp<strong>in</strong>es; B. Fu, College of Life Sciences,<br />
Wuhan University, Wuhan, Ch<strong>in</strong>a.<br />
Genomics 373
374 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics<br />
Fig. 1. Chromosomal distribution of BAC clones along the length of chromosome 11.<br />
25C06<br />
17D13 AB191400<br />
Cornell map<br />
107<br />
104<br />
99.5<br />
95.1<br />
90.2<br />
85.1<br />
81.1<br />
78.3<br />
Tolrm-3<br />
RG304<br />
RG91<br />
RZ525<br />
CD0127B<br />
RZ638<br />
RG1022<br />
RZ557<br />
RZ722<br />
RGP map<br />
0.0<br />
0.3<br />
7.2<br />
8.5<br />
25.1<br />
OSR1<br />
06H18<br />
42D09<br />
02B21<br />
RM4<br />
RM20<br />
15F19<br />
16E24<br />
26C08<br />
01D19<br />
10A19<br />
17D13<br />
15K24<br />
16H24<br />
16H09<br />
Tol28<br />
R77<br />
C562<br />
S1409<br />
G24A<br />
RG364<br />
RG18<br />
33O06<br />
36P19<br />
12F05<br />
21G10<br />
21F10<br />
16O08<br />
24G20<br />
05A15<br />
07F17<br />
06A16<br />
42H23<br />
12C10<br />
RG574<br />
G189A<br />
05G02<br />
41L03<br />
21G10<br />
45M10<br />
43O08<br />
21F10<br />
14O08<br />
34C11<br />
34C16<br />
34C17<br />
31D16<br />
45B17<br />
45C17<br />
14F02<br />
32F04<br />
10F05<br />
10HJ05<br />
22C22<br />
25H11<br />
34D11<br />
34H09<br />
40I06<br />
42J23<br />
46B20<br />
R2525<br />
CD01216<br />
48J06<br />
15M11<br />
15O07<br />
14J07<br />
37I07<br />
37L08<br />
37L09<br />
42G11<br />
RZ638<br />
C410<br />
RG118<br />
RG1022<br />
RZ557<br />
RZ722<br />
21F10<br />
16O08<br />
24K15<br />
24K21<br />
15L05<br />
34C22<br />
48L03 04L21<br />
21G04 11G02<br />
06K02 06K02<br />
11K21<br />
24K02<br />
11D14<br />
06O02<br />
11K14<br />
24K02<br />
24K21<br />
J090650<br />
F053800<br />
F050700<br />
F050600<br />
30J10<br />
23B07<br />
30B03<br />
11K13<br />
30O06<br />
22F07<br />
40A19<br />
23N07<br />
22N14<br />
23B07<br />
34B08<br />
11K13<br />
F15I300<br />
K040700<br />
34B08<br />
48.4<br />
39.1<br />
37.4<br />
33.4<br />
29.9<br />
26.1<br />
22.4<br />
21<br />
RG1094<br />
RG147<br />
RZ100<br />
RG2<br />
RG14<br />
RZ747<br />
CDO365<br />
CDO574X<br />
Nc24<br />
RG123<br />
RG112<br />
C292<br />
RG1094<br />
RM269<br />
RM202<br />
RG211<br />
C944<br />
G44<br />
R341<br />
51915<br />
RG167<br />
RM209<br />
RM224<br />
RM21<br />
RM167<br />
5790A<br />
R2464<br />
C3<br />
RG2<br />
RG12<br />
RG14<br />
RZ747<br />
CDO365<br />
CDO534<br />
No21<br />
RG103<br />
C1172<br />
C1172<br />
R2537<br />
G189<br />
34O14<br />
46H14<br />
46L19<br />
34H15<br />
34O15<br />
A195900<br />
02H24<br />
09I13<br />
04H14<br />
03H24<br />
A191000<br />
25H12<br />
25H13<br />
25H14<br />
34L14<br />
46H15<br />
20I15<br />
02H21<br />
21I16<br />
12H22<br />
07C11<br />
20C69<br />
47K16<br />
45802<br />
44N06<br />
12I01<br />
02H21<br />
34H14<br />
15N26<br />
07L14<br />
17H24<br />
00123<br />
37I20<br />
0091<br />
12O10<br />
42H23<br />
06A16<br />
32018<br />
07507<br />
10I18<br />
15N04<br />
41O95<br />
44G08<br />
34F01<br />
13F02<br />
35C14<br />
35O24<br />
13C24<br />
24J01<br />
19H22<br />
04H13<br />
04H10<br />
21F10<br />
36A94<br />
47O14<br />
32B11<br />
39J02<br />
44I06<br />
13H09<br />
40T13<br />
30J11<br />
40K23<br />
47J14<br />
38O92<br />
03L07<br />
04P10<br />
31T04<br />
46K16<br />
46L15<br />
12H22 K100T00<br />
14P13<br />
21F03<br />
11K14<br />
11K12<br />
00494<br />
33I67<br />
14Z100<br />
04O44<br />
00J22<br />
AL091204<br />
05K04<br />
04117<br />
00L11<br />
01N14<br />
11A11<br />
14I12<br />
18M16<br />
10I16<br />
04F11<br />
04M16<br />
11A11<br />
18I18<br />
20F08<br />
14N14<br />
34F01<br />
04A12<br />
14N14<br />
20F10<br />
ADI60344<br />
34L04<br />
31O04<br />
44H13<br />
46H10<br />
46N10<br />
32H01<br />
32F04<br />
24O41<br />
41H16<br />
10L20<br />
24C22<br />
32O18<br />
39J04<br />
44I06<br />
04H13<br />
24L01<br />
34J00<br />
24I07<br />
11F20<br />
10C16<br />
04T65<br />
06M13<br />
17O12<br />
40J12<br />
40F13<br />
30J11<br />
30J14<br />
AL180600<br />
OZ2420F4<br />
0121350<br />
20.0<br />
17.7<br />
12.7<br />
7.1<br />
9.0<br />
–2.0<br />
–4.0<br />
–4.0<br />
–4.0<br />
RG103X<br />
pTA248<br />
RZ537<br />
CDO520<br />
RG1104<br />
RG303<br />
RZ934<br />
Pi-1(t)<br />
Xo-3<br />
R04<br />
C50<br />
89.8<br />
90.3<br />
91.1<br />
98.4<br />
101.1<br />
104.1<br />
106.0<br />
109.3<br />
111.2<br />
112.0<br />
113.2<br />
115.2<br />
115.2<br />
116.4<br />
116.7<br />
117.0<br />
118.4<br />
C6<br />
G4001<br />
CDO520<br />
RG1104<br />
G1465<br />
RM204<br />
RM254<br />
RM224<br />
G276<br />
RG303<br />
L833<br />
C82<br />
G389<br />
C954<br />
G131<br />
R251<br />
RM20<br />
RG353<br />
RG184<br />
R1504<br />
512886<br />
L3628<br />
C101505<br />
T6055R4<br />
S1872<br />
L140<br />
C102455<br />
R543<br />
R2424<br />
R2536<br />
S10559<br />
To13<br />
40A05<br />
01O16<br />
01P14<br />
34A04<br />
45A07<br />
41G02<br />
45B20<br />
24O01<br />
16B04<br />
06H10<br />
16K22<br />
24K04<br />
08O09<br />
24O01<br />
24C22<br />
32H01<br />
42L21<br />
42F11<br />
03L04<br />
32B10<br />
11A11<br />
24O01<br />
24O91<br />
11B06<br />
34K10<br />
12M04<br />
16L03<br />
16L17<br />
16F09<br />
16I03<br />
14N17<br />
37I03<br />
14N18<br />
23K24<br />
14C05<br />
32A16<br />
14A02<br />
32M07<br />
27N15<br />
27N03<br />
14N17<br />
14A02<br />
14H12<br />
11N17<br />
11N02<br />
32P17<br />
02N02<br />
K160300<br />
NO30800<br />
NO31400<br />
NO31000<br />
42K21<br />
40F13<br />
16J17<br />
14F15<br />
40K23<br />
##L04<br />
04G01<br />
31K01 34G01<br />
34I01<br />
44B12<br />
15I01<br />
16J17<br />
24F13<br />
34J11<br />
42F11<br />
30J11<br />
30M22<br />
40F12<br />
40K23<br />
39G01<br />
47J14<br />
42L21<br />
02O02<br />
45G02<br />
31K01<br />
40K04<br />
21K01<br />
17O19<br />
16E09<br />
20K11<br />
10C19<br />
30A04<br />
28N04<br />
29M02<br />
37I15<br />
14M13<br />
G031010<br />
K023540<br />
16F02<br />
16J02<br />
20N02 NO81500<br />
08J01<br />
15I23<br />
18I04<br />
18J04<br />
30H17<br />
AH091418<br />
30L21<br />
30L17<br />
18J04<br />
30H17 C150800<br />
06M10<br />
24K01<br />
30A04<br />
08H21<br />
12N09<br />
30I05<br />
48F12<br />
48G12<br />
08I21<br />
08G21<br />
LP007520076<br />
36P19<br />
33O46<br />
24F13<br />
01O16<br />
01P18<br />
38K17<br />
44G02<br />
45P20<br />
42C10<br />
02G03<br />
23G08 LPC055<br />
VO91800<br />
Q161200<br />
O111200<br />
N061000<br />
24K06<br />
21M5<br />
42C18<br />
42I07<br />
04G07<br />
30L21<br />
48K20<br />
02018
Centromere structure of rice chromosome 5<br />
K.I. Nonomura and N. Kurata<br />
The centromere region of rice chromosomes consists of complex organizations with multiple repetitive elements. We aligned<br />
and analyzed contiguous YAC (yeast artificial chromosome) and BAC (bacterial artificial chromosome) clones (contigs) derived<br />
from the centromere region of rice chromosome 5. Tandem repeats of RCS2, which is a 160-bp repeat unit, were separated<br />
<strong>in</strong>to two clusters by about a 40-bp <strong>in</strong>terven<strong>in</strong>g sequence. Both clusters of RCS2 units seemed to be arranged <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>verted<br />
symmetry. At least 17 copies of 1.9-bp RCE1 centromeric repeats were also distributed along several hundred bp around both<br />
RCS2 clusters. A reduction <strong>in</strong> genetic recomb<strong>in</strong>ation was observed along the region where the contigs were derived. Furthermore,<br />
fluorescent <strong>in</strong> situ hybridization (FISH) analysis of a BAC clone <strong>in</strong> one contig showed a complete match of the position<br />
to the primary constriction of chromosome 5. These f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong>dicated that the contig presented here was derived from a<br />
functional core for centromere formation <strong>in</strong> rice chromosome 5.<br />
The centromere is an important doma<strong>in</strong> for k<strong>in</strong>etochore formation,<br />
sister chromatid cohesion, and transmission of chromosomes.<br />
In multicellular organisms, the centromere is embedded<br />
<strong>in</strong> large blocks of heterochromat<strong>in</strong> composed of highly<br />
reiterated sequences. The pericentromeric repetitive sequences<br />
are important for k<strong>in</strong>etochore formation and the stable transmission<br />
of chromosomes. The centromere regions of<br />
Arabidopsis thaliana were def<strong>in</strong>ed on a contiguous map of<br />
full-sequenced BAC clones, whereas highly repeated regions<br />
such as 180-bp tandem repeat clusters rema<strong>in</strong>ed as gaps. Those<br />
regions showed a dramatic reduction <strong>in</strong> genetic recomb<strong>in</strong>ation<br />
and conta<strong>in</strong>ed abundant mobile elements. However, the<br />
core sequences for k<strong>in</strong>etochore formation are still ambiguous<br />
<strong>in</strong> plant chromosomes because centromere-specific b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g<br />
prote<strong>in</strong>s have not been isolated. The f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g of a maize homologue<br />
of human CENP-C associated with a centromeric<br />
retroelement, pSau3A9 (Dawe et al 1999), is the only case<br />
<strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>in</strong>teraction of centromere prote<strong>in</strong> with chromat<strong>in</strong><br />
components <strong>in</strong> the plant k<strong>in</strong>gdom.<br />
In a previous study, we isolated a 1.9-kb centromerespecific<br />
repetitive element, RCE1, which is the rice homologue<br />
of maize pSau3A9 (Nonomura and Kurata 1999). Screen<strong>in</strong>g<br />
and contiguous alignment of YAC and BAC clones (contigs)<br />
revealed that RCE1 and RCS2, and other centromeric repeats<br />
reported by Dong et al (1998), exhibited specific localization<br />
on a contig map of the centromere region and that the rice<br />
centromere is composed of various repetitive elements, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g<br />
retrotransposon-like sequences. We describe here the composition<br />
of the centromeric repetitive elements <strong>in</strong> rice chromosome<br />
5.<br />
Screen<strong>in</strong>g of YAC clones with centromeric repeats<br />
RCS2 and RCE1 are about 160-bp and 1.9-kb repetitive units,<br />
respectively, which show centromere-specific localization <strong>in</strong><br />
the rice genome (Dong et al 1998, Nonomura and Kurata 1999).<br />
To isolate YAC clones derived from the centromere region, an<br />
RCS2 repeat unit was used as a probe for screen<strong>in</strong>g a YAC<br />
filter set (Umehara et al 1995). N<strong>in</strong>eteen positive clones were<br />
isolated from a total of 7,104 YAC clones, <strong>in</strong> which only Y6514<br />
was anchored to chromosome 5 by RFLP marker G260 (Saji<br />
et al 1996). Y6514 also conta<strong>in</strong>ed RCE1 repeats from the result<br />
of Southern blot hybridization. A G260 locus was mapped<br />
at 53.7 cM and was <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> a candidate centromere region<br />
determ<strong>in</strong>ed cytogenetically on an RFLP l<strong>in</strong>kage map (S<strong>in</strong>gh et<br />
al 1996, Harushima et al 1998). In this position, no recomb<strong>in</strong>ant<br />
segregated among 10 RFLP markers <strong>in</strong> 186 F 2 populations<br />
(Harushima et al 1998), mean<strong>in</strong>g a suppression of genetic<br />
recomb<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>in</strong> this region (Saji et al 1996). These facts<br />
strongly suggested that the Y6514 clone was derived from the<br />
centromere region of rice chromosome 5.<br />
Distribution pattern of RCS2 and RCE1 <strong>in</strong> the centromere<br />
region of chromosome 5<br />
Four YACs, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g Y6514, and 11 BACs were screened<br />
with three RFLP markers at the 53.7-cM position, and aligned<br />
by means of Southern blot hybridization and polymerase cha<strong>in</strong><br />
reaction with the end sequences of those clones. Information<br />
of end sequences and f<strong>in</strong>gerpr<strong>in</strong>t patterns of BAC clones was<br />
obta<strong>in</strong>ed from the Web site of the Clemson University<br />
Genomics Institute (CUGI, www.genome.clemson.edu/).<br />
RCS2 repeats were separated <strong>in</strong>to two clusters, <strong>in</strong> which<br />
they were arranged tandemly as observed <strong>in</strong> Southern blot<br />
analysis of Y6514 and Y1263 with a 160-bp ladder pattern<br />
(data not shown). From the result of subclon<strong>in</strong>g and sequenc<strong>in</strong>g<br />
DNA fragments around RCS2 clusters, both clusters of the<br />
RCS2 tandem seemed to be arranged with <strong>in</strong>verted symmetry<br />
<strong>in</strong> the centromere region of chromosome 5. The <strong>in</strong>terven<strong>in</strong>g<br />
region between both clusters was about 40 bp long <strong>in</strong> maximum<br />
and <strong>in</strong>cluded cDNA clone RZ296, 520 bp adjacent to<br />
c1, and a copy of the RCE1 repeat (#8-1). Sixteen copies of<br />
RCE1, except #8-1, were distributed on both sides of RCS2<br />
clusters. On the other hand, no copies of RCE1 were observed<br />
<strong>in</strong> Y3173, about 200 bp distal from the RCS2 clusters. This<br />
<strong>in</strong>dicated characteristic localization of RCE1 repeats <strong>in</strong> the<br />
centromere region of chromosome 5. B08E07, B95H15, and<br />
B09I21 exhibited additional 4.2- and 20-bp bands compared<br />
Genomics 375
Table 1. Database search of YAC/BAC end sequences for DDBJ database with BLASTN2.0.11 search.<br />
Hit sequence<br />
Clone # Size Acc. no.<br />
searched (bp) Score E value Comments<br />
(bits)<br />
B22G11r 687 AB013613 339 2.00E-90 O. sativa DNA, centromere sequence RCB11<br />
AB014740 48 1.10E-02 O. sativa gypsy-type retrotransposon RIRE8A<br />
B01P11r 546 AB008772 80 3.00E-12 Triticum aestivum retrotransposon Tar1<br />
D85597 38 8.60E+00 O. australiensis retrotransposon RIRE1<br />
Y1263L 607 AB030283 96 5.00E-17 O. sativa gypsy-type retrotransposon RIRE2 DNA<br />
Y3173L 119 AB014738 157 3.00E-36 O. sativa gypsy-type retrotransposon RIRE3 DNA<br />
AB014740 70 5.00E-10 O. sativa gypsy-type retrotransposon RIRE8A<br />
AB014741 58 2.00E-06 O. sativa gypsy-type retrotransposon RIRE8B DNA<br />
Y4960R 103 AA231744 168 6.00E-40 RZ296 cDNA from rice O. sativa<br />
Y6514L 61 AF058904 113 1.00E-23 O. sativa subsp. <strong>in</strong>dica centromeric repeat family RCH2<br />
Y3559L 71 AF058904 113 2.00E-23 O. sativa subsp. <strong>in</strong>dica centromeric repeat family RCH2<br />
AF090446 64 1.00E-08 Zea mays retrotransposon Opie-2<br />
AF078903 52 6.00E-05 O. sativa subsp. <strong>in</strong>dica centromeric repeat family RCS1<br />
with Y1263 RCS2. Although it was not known which clone<br />
reflected the nature of the centromere structure, it was possible<br />
that BAC clones were rearranged or amplified <strong>in</strong> RCS2<br />
tandem clusters.<br />
Exact location of centromeric BAC clone on the primary<br />
constriction of chromosome 5<br />
A BAC clone B09I21 conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g RCS2 and RCE1 repeats was<br />
labeled by the nicktranslation method and provided for fluorescent<br />
<strong>in</strong> situ hybridization (FISH) to locate it on somatic<br />
chromosomes. This probe gave multiple signals that appeared<br />
<strong>in</strong> many centromere regions because of the ubiquitous centromeric<br />
repeats <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> B09I21. To suppress common signals<br />
for centromere regions, nonlabeled RCE1 and RCS2 fragments<br />
were added <strong>in</strong> a hybridization mixture. Doublet signals<br />
were observed only on a homologous pair, which was a submetacentric<br />
karyotype of chromosome 5 (Kurata and Omura<br />
1978). A doublet of rhodam<strong>in</strong>e signal exactly localized to the<br />
primary constriction provided the evidence that B09I21 and<br />
adjacent clones were derived from the centromere region of<br />
chromosome 5.<br />
Multiple repetitive elements lie <strong>in</strong> centromeric YAC and BAC<br />
contigs of chromosome 5<br />
The end sequences of centromeric YAC and BAC clones of<br />
chromosome 5 were obta<strong>in</strong>ed from a database search (Table<br />
1). Most of the BAC end clones showed homology with a large<br />
number of other BAC end sequences registered by CUGI,<br />
mean<strong>in</strong>g that the centromere region was composed of multiple<br />
repetitive elements. Several end sequences exhibited homology<br />
to some k<strong>in</strong>ds of retrotransposons and centromeric repeats<br />
(Table 1). In fact, Southern blot analysis revealed that centromeric<br />
YAC and BAC contigs were rich <strong>in</strong> sequences similar to<br />
long term<strong>in</strong>al repeats of RIRE3, a Ty3/gypsy-type retrotransposon<br />
found <strong>in</strong> cultivated rice.<br />
RCS2 and RCE1 repeat clusters are strong candidates<br />
for the conformation center of k<strong>in</strong>etochore <strong>in</strong> rice chromosomes<br />
for the follow<strong>in</strong>g reasons: (1) the maize homologue of<br />
human CENP-C closely associated with pSau3A9 is homologous<br />
to RCE1 <strong>in</strong> maize cells (Dawe et al. 1999); (2) RCE1 and<br />
its family repeats were found <strong>in</strong> most cereal centromeres (Jiang<br />
et al 1996); (3) FISH signals of RCS2 and RCE1 were observed<br />
on the centromere regions of all chromosomes (Dong<br />
et al 1998, Nonomura and Kurata 1999); (4) genetic recomb<strong>in</strong>ation<br />
rates were suppressed along the contig region, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g<br />
RCS2 and RCE1 repeats; and (5) a BAC clone <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g<br />
both repeat clusters was exactly positioned on the primary<br />
constriction of rice chromosome 5. One of the ways to determ<strong>in</strong>e<br />
functional allocation of centromeres on the rice chromosomes<br />
is to construct rice artificial chromosomes (RAC) based<br />
on YAC and BAC clones, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g centromeric repetitive elements.<br />
The RAC construct will be useful not only for basic<br />
science but also for practical breed<strong>in</strong>g programs.<br />
References<br />
Dawe RK, Reed LM, Yu HG, Muszynski MG, Hiat EN. 1999. A<br />
maize homolog of mammalian CENPC is a constitutive component<br />
of the <strong>in</strong>ner k<strong>in</strong>etochore. Plant Cell 11:1227-1238.<br />
Dong F, Miller JT, Jackson SA, Wang GL, Ronald PC, Jiang J. 1998.<br />
<strong>Rice</strong> (Oryza sativa) centromeric regions consist of complex<br />
DNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95:8135-8140.<br />
Harushima Y, Yano M, Shomura A, Sato M, Shimano T, Kuboki Y,<br />
Yamamoto T, L<strong>in</strong> SY, Antonio BA, Parco A, Kajiya H, Huang<br />
H, Yamamoto K, Nagamura Y, Kurata N, Khush GS, Sasaki<br />
T. 1998. A high-density rice genetic l<strong>in</strong>kage map with 2275<br />
markers us<strong>in</strong>g a s<strong>in</strong>gle F 2 population. <strong>Genetics</strong> 148:479-494.<br />
Jiang J, Nasuda S, Dong F, Scherrer CW, Woo SS, W<strong>in</strong>g RA, Gill<br />
BS, Ward DC. 1996. A conserved repetitive DNA element<br />
located <strong>in</strong> the centromeres of cereal chromosomes. Proc. Natl.<br />
Acad. Sci. USA 93:14210-14213.<br />
376 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
Kurata N, Omura T. 1978. Karyotype analysis <strong>in</strong> rice. I. A new method<br />
for identify<strong>in</strong>g all chromosome pairs. Jpn. J. Genet. 53:251-<br />
255.<br />
Nonomura KI, Kurata N. 1999. Organization of the 1.9-kb repeat<br />
unit RCE1 <strong>in</strong> the centromeric region of rice chromosomes.<br />
Mol. Gen. Genet. 261:1-10.<br />
Saji S, Umehara Y, Kurata N, Ashikawa I. Sasaki T. 1996. Construction<br />
of YAC contigs on rice chromosome 5. DNA Res. 3:297-<br />
302.<br />
S<strong>in</strong>gh K, Ishii T, Parco A, Huang N, Brar DS, Khush GS. 1996.<br />
Centromere mapp<strong>in</strong>g and orientation of the molecular l<strong>in</strong>kage<br />
map of rice (Oryza sativa L.). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA<br />
93:6163-6168.<br />
Umehara Y, Inagaki A, Tanoue H, Yasukochi Y, Nagamura Y, Saji S,<br />
Otsuki Y, Fujimura T, Kurata N, M<strong>in</strong>obe Y. 1995. Construction<br />
and characterization of a rice YAC library for physical<br />
mapp<strong>in</strong>g. Mol. Breed. 1:79-89.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ address: National Institute of <strong>Genetics</strong>, Yata 1111, Mishima,<br />
Shizuoka 411-8540, Japan.<br />
Acknowledgments: We thank R. W<strong>in</strong>g for shar<strong>in</strong>g the BAC library<br />
and filters of O. sativa cv. Nipponbare, and H. Ohtsubo for<br />
provid<strong>in</strong>g LTR clones of the RIRE series. We are also grateful<br />
to the <strong>Rice</strong> Genome Project (RGP) STAFF /MAFF DNA bank<br />
of Japan and S. McCouch for provid<strong>in</strong>g RFLP marker clones.<br />
This research was supported by Grant-<strong>in</strong>-Aid for Scientific<br />
Research (B) 09460006 and for Encouragement of Young<br />
Scientists (A) 11760227 of the M<strong>in</strong>istry of Education, Science,<br />
Sports, and Culture, Japan.<br />
Genic <strong>in</strong>teraction between mutant genes related<br />
to morphogenesis of panicle and spikelet <strong>in</strong> rice<br />
I. Takamure, T. Aida, and S. Niikura<br />
The leafy hull sterile (lhs) mutant is characterized by a deformed lemma and palea show<strong>in</strong>g a leafy sheath structure and<br />
accompanied by various malformed floral organs. In the retarded panicle rp(t) mutant, panicle development is <strong>in</strong>hibited under<br />
low-temperature conditions. The neckleaf nl1 mutant has a bract leaf at the neck node of the panicle. We exam<strong>in</strong>ed genic<br />
<strong>in</strong>teractions among lhs, rp(t), and nl1. Double mutants were produced <strong>in</strong> F 2<br />
populations of crosses among three l<strong>in</strong>es—H-726<br />
(lhs), N-180 (rp(t)), and H-69 (nl1). A segregation ratio of 9:3:3:1 was observed <strong>in</strong> the respective populations. The double<br />
mutant lhs rp(t) showed shoot-like spikelets, whereas the double mutant rp(t) nl1 showed shoot-like panicles. In contrast, the<br />
double mutant lhs nl1 showed lhs-type spikelets and nl1-type bract leaves. Therefore, there is no genic <strong>in</strong>teraction between lhs<br />
and nl1. Two double mutants (lhs rp(t) and rp(t) nl1), their parental l<strong>in</strong>es, and cultivar Shiokari as the control were tested for<br />
root<strong>in</strong>g and vegetative growth ability from sterile spikelets and panicles. Only the double mutants lhs rp(t) and rp(t) nl1 grew to<br />
<strong>in</strong>dependent plants from their shoot-like spikelets and panicles, respectively. These results <strong>in</strong>dicated that the double mutants<br />
lhs rp(t) and rp(t) nl1 <strong>in</strong>hibit the differentiation of floral organs, thus ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g vegetative growth dur<strong>in</strong>g spikelet and panicle<br />
development, respectively.<br />
Many morphological mutants with variation <strong>in</strong> panicles and<br />
spikelets have been reported. The malformed mutants are important<br />
for understand<strong>in</strong>g the morphogenesis of the panicle<br />
and spikelet. In this study, we focused on three mutants, lhs,<br />
rp(t), and nl1, and exam<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong>teractions among these genes.<br />
The leafy hull sterile mutant is controlled by a s<strong>in</strong>gle recessive<br />
gene, lhs, located on chromosome 3 (K<strong>in</strong>oshita et al 1977).<br />
Based on comparative observations of three organs (hull, leaf<br />
blade, and leaf sheath) and peroxidase isozyme reaction, it<br />
appears that lhs may be related to the developmental modification<br />
from hull to leaf sheath (Niikura et al 1992, Takamure<br />
and K<strong>in</strong>oshita 1996). Further, the lhs mutant lacks a palea and<br />
develops two lemmas <strong>in</strong> a spikelet. This mutant seems to have<br />
the capability to develop more than two florets <strong>in</strong> a spikelet<br />
with two leafy lemmas (Aida et al 1997). The retarded panicle<br />
mutant is controlled by a s<strong>in</strong>gle recessive gene, rp(t) (Aida et<br />
al 1995). Under low-temperature conditions, panicles of the<br />
rp(t) mutant rema<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> a juvenile stage without spikelet formation<br />
and are covered with bract hairs. In contrast, the rp(t)<br />
mutant develops nearly normal panicles and spikelets with low<br />
seed sett<strong>in</strong>g under high-temperature conditions. The neck-leaf<br />
mutant is controlled by a s<strong>in</strong>gle recessive gene, nl1, located on<br />
chromosome 5 (Nagao and Takahashi 1963). Usually, the large<br />
part of the nl1 panicle is enclosed by the bract leaf.<br />
Materials and methods<br />
Three l<strong>in</strong>es, H-726, N-180, and H-69, carry<strong>in</strong>g lhs, rp(t), and<br />
nl1 genes, respectively, were used as parents. To produce<br />
double mutants, these three l<strong>in</strong>es were <strong>in</strong>tercrossed. The F 2<br />
populations were grown <strong>in</strong> the rice field of the Experiment<br />
Farm, Faculty of Agriculture, Hokkaido University.<br />
Two double mutants (lhs/rp(t) and rp(t)/nl1), their parental<br />
l<strong>in</strong>es, and cv. Shiokari as a control were used for compar<strong>in</strong>g<br />
character expression. To <strong>in</strong>vestigate the effect of temperature<br />
on character expression, these l<strong>in</strong>es were grown <strong>in</strong><br />
Genomics 377
Fig. 1. F 2 segregation for panicle<br />
types (A) and spikelet types (B)<br />
<strong>in</strong> the cross H-726 (lhs) × N-180<br />
(rp(t)) (from left to right, + +, +<br />
rp(t), lhs +, and lhs rp(t)).<br />
Table 1. Comb<strong>in</strong>ed segregations of mutant genes <strong>in</strong> F 2 populations.<br />
Cross<br />
F 2 segregation<br />
comb<strong>in</strong>ation A:B Ratio χ 2 P<br />
AB Ab aB ab Total<br />
H-726 × N-180 lhs:rp(t) 613 188 196 67 1,064 9:3:3:1 1.08 0.7–0.8<br />
N-180 × H-69 rp(t):nl1 164 50 55 23 292 9:3:3:1 1.65 0.6–0.7<br />
H-726 × H-69 lhs:nl1 138 53 41 15 247 9:3:3:1 1.59 0.6–0.7<br />
growth chambers kept at low (20 °C) and high (28 °C) temperatures.<br />
To study vegetative growth ability, sterile spikelets<br />
and panicles from those l<strong>in</strong>es, which were still green, were<br />
germ<strong>in</strong>ated <strong>in</strong> trays with 5-mm-deep water.<br />
Fig. 2. F 2 segregation for panicle types <strong>in</strong> the cross N-180 (rp(t)) ×<br />
H-69 (nl1) (from left to right, + +, + nl1, rp(t) +, and rp(t) nl1).<br />
Results and discussion<br />
The F 2 population of the cross H-726 × N-180 segregated <strong>in</strong>to<br />
the ratio of 9 normal:3 lhs:3 rp(t):1 shoot-like spikelet type<br />
(Fig. 1 and Table 1). The F 3 progeny test confirmed that the<br />
shoot-like spikelet type was caused by the double mutant (lhs<br />
rp(t)). The double mutant had long rudimentary glumes, long<br />
empty glumes, vegetative shoots, and no floral structures <strong>in</strong><br />
the spikelets. The lhs plant had two lemmas show<strong>in</strong>g leaf sheath<br />
structure <strong>in</strong> a spikelet, whereas the double mutant had some<br />
leaves that differentiated <strong>in</strong>to a leaf blade and tillers with<strong>in</strong> a<br />
spikelet.<br />
The F 2 population of the cross N-180 × H-69 segregated<br />
<strong>in</strong>to the ratio 9 normal:3 rp(t):3 nl1:1 shoot-like panicle type<br />
(Fig. 2 and Table 1). This was confirmed by the F 3 progeny<br />
test, which showed that the shoot-like panicle type was caused<br />
by the double mutant (rp(t) nl1). The double mutant had about<br />
10 leaves <strong>in</strong> the nodes of a panicle, a few reduced spikelets<br />
without floral organs, and complete sterility.<br />
The F 2 population of the cross H-726 × H-69 segregated<br />
<strong>in</strong>to the ratio 9 normal:3 lhs:3 nl1:1 lhs/nl1 (Table 1). The<br />
378 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
Table 2. Character expression of double mutants, parental l<strong>in</strong>es, and Shiokari <strong>in</strong> the growth chamber (28 and<br />
20 °C).<br />
L<strong>in</strong>e and cross Temperature Character a<br />
comb<strong>in</strong>ation (°C)<br />
BLN BLL SN SF SL IE OE IR OR<br />
Shiokari 28 – – 72.3 87.7 5.52 2.10 2.18 – –<br />
20 – – 64.3 16.6** 5.68 2.43** 2.43** – –<br />
H-69 (nl1) 28 1.0 18.1 49.3 92.7 5.77 2.71 2.63 – –<br />
20 1.3 21.4 47.5 27.0** 5.93 3.16** 2.87 – –<br />
N-180 (rp(t)) 28 – – 46.8 23.1 6.21 4.23 4.26 1.33 0.81<br />
20 1.8 0.8 17.5** 0.0 7.15** 7.03** 6.27** 2.84 1.29<br />
H-726 (lhs) 28 – – 78.0 11.1 11.80 2.06 2.16 – –<br />
20 – – 73.5 0.0* 12.92 2.22 2.25 – –<br />
N-180 × H-69 28 2.0 11.4 4.8 0.0 6.48 6.53 6.37 2.39 0.94<br />
(F rp(t) nl1) 20 8.5 22.1 – – – – – – –<br />
H-726 × N-180 28 – – 33.3 0.0 21.43 2.89 2.91 1.57 0.81<br />
(F lhs rp(t)) 20 1.0 1.4 14.0* 0.0 21.44 8.24** 6.52** 1.99 1.09<br />
a BLN = bract leaf no., BLL = bract leaf length (cm), SN = spikelet no., SF = seed fertility (%), SL = spikelet length (mm), IE and OE =<br />
<strong>in</strong>side and outside empty glume length (mm), IR and OR = <strong>in</strong>side and outside rudimentary glume length (mm). *,** = significantly different<br />
from the high temperature (28 °C) at the 5% and 1% levels, respectively.<br />
double mutants showed lhs-type spikelets and nl1-type bract<br />
leaves. This means that there is no genic <strong>in</strong>teraction between<br />
lhs and nl1.<br />
Table 2 shows the effect of temperature on the character<br />
expression of panicles and spikelets <strong>in</strong> two double mutants<br />
(lhs rp(t) and rp(t) nl1), their parental l<strong>in</strong>es, and Shiokari. N-<br />
180 had elongated bract leaves and spikelets, empty and rudimentary<br />
glumes, reduced spikelet number, and complete sterility<br />
under low-temperature conditions. The double mutant<br />
rp(t) nl1 differentiated leaves <strong>in</strong>stead of branches from nodes<br />
on panicles and showed no spikelets under low-temperature<br />
conditions. The double mutant lhs rp(t) showed leaves <strong>in</strong>stead<br />
of florets <strong>in</strong> spikelets under both conditions. Under low-temperature<br />
conditions, this double mutant had elongated bract<br />
leaves and spikelets, empty and rudimentary glumes, and reduced<br />
spikelet number. These results showed that the character<br />
expression of lhs rp(t) and rp(t) nl1 was affected by temperature<br />
conditions.<br />
Table 3 shows root<strong>in</strong>g rates from sterile spikelets or<br />
panicles of two double mutants and four l<strong>in</strong>es. H-726 showed<br />
low root<strong>in</strong>g rate from basal nodes of leafy sterile spikelets.<br />
Double mutants lhs rp(t) and rp(t) nl1 showed high root<strong>in</strong>g<br />
rates from nodes of shoot-like spikelets and shoot-like panicles,<br />
respectively. These root<strong>in</strong>g spikelets and panicle nodes were<br />
transplanted <strong>in</strong> flooded soil <strong>in</strong> pots. Some spikelets and panicle<br />
nodes of two double mutants, lhs rp(t) and rp(t) nl1, grew to<br />
<strong>in</strong>dependent plants and showed the same phenotypes as the<br />
orig<strong>in</strong>al plants. The shoot-like spikelet of lhs rp(t) and the<br />
shoot-like panicle of rp(t) nl1 had vegetative growth abilities.<br />
These results <strong>in</strong>dicated that the double mutants lhs rp(t)<br />
and rp(t) nl1 <strong>in</strong>hibited the differentiation of floral organs, thus<br />
ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g vegetative growth dur<strong>in</strong>g spikelet and panicle development,<br />
respectively. Thus, the dom<strong>in</strong>ant alleles Lhs, Rp(t),<br />
Table 3. Root<strong>in</strong>g and establishment rates of sterile spikelets and<br />
panicles.<br />
L<strong>in</strong>e and cross Genotype Root<strong>in</strong>g establishment (%)<br />
comb<strong>in</strong>ation<br />
Shiokari – 0 0<br />
H-69 nl1 0 0<br />
N-180 rp(t) 0 0<br />
H-726 lhs 9.7 0<br />
N-180 × H-69 F rp(t) nl1 50.0 16.7<br />
H-726 × N-180 F lhs rp(t) 55.6 37.0<br />
and Nl1 are considered to have an important role <strong>in</strong> reproductive<br />
growth.<br />
References<br />
Aida T, Niikura S, Takamure I. 1997. Genic <strong>in</strong>teraction between lhs<br />
(leafy hull sterile) and some mutant genes related to spikelet<br />
formation. <strong>Rice</strong> Genet. Newsl. 14:50-52.<br />
Aida T, Takamure I, K<strong>in</strong>oshita T. 1995. Inheritance of a physiological<br />
mutant show<strong>in</strong>g retarded panicle development. <strong>Rice</strong> Genet.<br />
Newsl. 12:202-203.<br />
K<strong>in</strong>oshita T, Hidano Y, Takahashi M. 1977. A mutant long hull sterile<br />
found <strong>in</strong> the rice variety Sorachi. In: Genetical studies on<br />
rice plant, LXVII. Mem. Fac. Agric. Hokkaido Univ.<br />
10(3):247-268. (In Japanese with English summary.)<br />
Nagao S, Takahashi M. 1963. Trial construction of twelve l<strong>in</strong>kage<br />
groups <strong>in</strong> Japanese rice. In: Genetical studies on rice plant,<br />
XXVII . J. Fac. Agric. Hokkaido Univ. 53:72-130.<br />
Niikura S, Takamure I, K<strong>in</strong>oshita T. 1992. Character expression of<br />
leafy hull sterile (lhs-1) <strong>in</strong> rice. Jpn. J. Plant Breed. 42 (Suppl.<br />
2):288-289. (In Japanese.)<br />
Genomics 379
Takamure I, K<strong>in</strong>oshita T. 1996. Genetic analysis of morphological<br />
mutations <strong>in</strong> rice spikelets. In: <strong>Rice</strong> genetics III. Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs<br />
of the Third <strong>International</strong> <strong>Rice</strong> <strong>Genetics</strong> Symposium, 16-20<br />
Oct 1995. Manila (Philipp<strong>in</strong>es): <strong>International</strong> <strong>Rice</strong> Research<br />
Institute. p 387-390.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ addresses: I. Takamure, Graduate School of Agriculture,<br />
Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-8589; T. Aida, 5-24, Okojicho,<br />
Sendai, Kagoshima 895-8650; S. Niikura, Tohoku Seed<br />
Co., Utsunomiya 321-3232, Japan.<br />
Oryzabase: an <strong>in</strong>tegrated rice science database<br />
Y. Yamazaki, A. Yoshimura, Y. Nagato, and N. Kurata<br />
Oryzabase is a comprehensive rice science database established <strong>in</strong> 2000 by a rice researchers’ committee <strong>in</strong> Japan. The<br />
database orig<strong>in</strong>ally aimed at collect<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>formation rang<strong>in</strong>g from classical rice genetics to structural and functional genomics.<br />
The current Oryzabase consists of five parts: (1) genetic resources, (2) gene dictionary, (3) chromosome maps, (4) mutant<br />
images, and (5) fundamental knowledge on rice science. The database <strong>in</strong>cludes more than 10,000 accessions of germplasm<br />
collected or developed by classical breed<strong>in</strong>g and/or new molecular biological methods as a result of the long history of rice<br />
breed<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Japan. The Oryzabase map represents the <strong>in</strong>tegration of seven different maps from a classical l<strong>in</strong>kage map to the<br />
latest yeast artificial chromosome physical map provided by the <strong>Rice</strong> Genome Project. We have completed the <strong>in</strong>ternal crossl<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g<br />
of related <strong>in</strong>formation such as common markers on different maps, genes and the respective mutant images, stra<strong>in</strong>s<br />
and their marker genes, and so on. Us<strong>in</strong>g a good Web-based <strong>in</strong>terface, the rice gene dictionary has been constantly updated<br />
by appropriate researchers and the <strong>Rice</strong> <strong>Genetics</strong> Cooperative. We are plann<strong>in</strong>g to do a more extensive cross-referenc<strong>in</strong>g of<br />
Oryzabase to the major DNA sequence database, literature database, and other rice databases such as <strong>Rice</strong>genes to provide<br />
a wealth of <strong>in</strong>formation to rice researchers. Oryzabase is available at www.shigen.nig.ac.jp/rice/oryzabase/.<br />
The rice genetic resource database was created <strong>in</strong> 1997 and<br />
made available to the public through the Internet <strong>in</strong> collaboration<br />
with rice researchers. In 1998, the <strong>Rice</strong> Genetic Resource<br />
Committee was established to coord<strong>in</strong>ate different projects on<br />
genetic resource repository carried out at universities and research<br />
<strong>in</strong>stitutes <strong>in</strong> Japan and to construct the database. The<br />
committee handed over the rice genetic resource database and<br />
constructed a trial version of a more <strong>in</strong>tegrated database called<br />
Oryzabase. Oryzabase is a breed<strong>in</strong>g-science-oriented database<br />
and genome-science-oriented database. The goal of the database<br />
is to compile as much knowledge as possible and to supply<br />
virtual tools useful for experimental research.<br />
Contents<br />
Genetic resource stock <strong>in</strong>formation<br />
The current database compiles more than 10,000 stra<strong>in</strong>s, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g<br />
marker gene testers (1,258 accessions), mutant l<strong>in</strong>es<br />
(547), isogenic l<strong>in</strong>es (284), autotetraploid l<strong>in</strong>es (52), primary<br />
trisomics (71), reciprocal translocation homozygote l<strong>in</strong>es<br />
(224), cytoplasm substitution l<strong>in</strong>es (43), cell culture l<strong>in</strong>es (137),<br />
landraces and improved varieties (6,293), and wild species<br />
(1,609). The stock list still needs some revision. The latest<br />
<strong>in</strong>formation will appear <strong>in</strong> release 1.0.<br />
Gene dictionary<br />
The dictionary conta<strong>in</strong>s more than 900 marker genes and 185<br />
of them have been located on the maps, with more than 570<br />
assigned to the chromosomes. We have a work<strong>in</strong>g group revis<strong>in</strong>g<br />
the gene dictionary <strong>in</strong> cooperation with the <strong>Rice</strong> <strong>Genetics</strong><br />
Cooperative. Oryzabase has an onl<strong>in</strong>e gene management<br />
system, through which members can update <strong>in</strong>formation <strong>in</strong> the<br />
dictionary. About 1,100 references for genes have been collected.<br />
Integrated l<strong>in</strong>kage maps<br />
S<strong>in</strong>ce the <strong>in</strong>tegration of the different l<strong>in</strong>kage maps, full crossl<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g<br />
of seven different maps has been done <strong>in</strong> Oryzabase. A<br />
l<strong>in</strong>e is drawn between the common marker’s loci on different<br />
maps, so that, if researchers f<strong>in</strong>d a certa<strong>in</strong> marker on a map,<br />
they can see its location relative to a common marker(s) between<br />
neighbor<strong>in</strong>g maps (Fig.1) as well as retrieve relevant<br />
<strong>in</strong>formation through the map (Fig. 2).<br />
The l<strong>in</strong>kage maps used <strong>in</strong> the database are as follows:<br />
CL map: Classical l<strong>in</strong>kage map with more than 209 phenotypic<br />
markers (K<strong>in</strong>oshita 1998).<br />
IT map: Integrated map locat<strong>in</strong>g 83 restriction fragment<br />
length polymorphism (RFLP) markers and 40 phenotypic<br />
marker genes us<strong>in</strong>g 17 F 2 populations and 1 F 3 population<br />
(Yoshimura et al 1997).<br />
RI map: RFLP framework map with 375 markers us<strong>in</strong>g<br />
recomb<strong>in</strong>ant <strong>in</strong>bred l<strong>in</strong>es from a cross of japonica (Asom<strong>in</strong>ori)<br />
and <strong>in</strong>dica rice (IR24) (Tsunematsu et al 1996).<br />
NK map: Molecular genetic map with 2,275 markers,<br />
which was constructed with an F 2 population from a cross of<br />
<strong>in</strong>dica × japonica rice (Harushima et al 1998).<br />
RGN map: RFLP map with 423 markers from the F 2<br />
population of O. sativa × O. rufipogon.<br />
Cornell map: Molecular map with 716 markers, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g<br />
ma<strong>in</strong>ly RFLP and cDNA markers us<strong>in</strong>g backcross popula-<br />
380 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
Fig. 1. Cross-l<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g map display of CL, IT, RI, and NK maps. A l<strong>in</strong>e is drawn between the common marker’s (spl1) loci on<br />
the two different maps (e.g., CL and IT). The gene name <strong>in</strong> the map is l<strong>in</strong>ked to the relevant <strong>in</strong>formation shown <strong>in</strong> Figure<br />
2.<br />
tions of O. sativa and O. longistam<strong>in</strong>ata populations (Causse<br />
et al 1994).<br />
YAC contigs: Physical map with YAC clones (Kurata et<br />
al 1997).<br />
Mutant images<br />
There are about 80 mutant image collections <strong>in</strong> the database.<br />
The mutant phenotype was classified <strong>in</strong>to six categories: (1)<br />
seed, (2) endosperm, (3) panicle, (4) leaf (chlorophyll aberration),<br />
(5) leaf (disease spots), and (6) embryogenesis (Fig. 3).<br />
Stra<strong>in</strong>s, gene <strong>in</strong>formation, references, l<strong>in</strong>kage maps, and mutant<br />
images are connected to each other by a common gene ID<br />
<strong>in</strong> the database to help users easily access all the relevant <strong>in</strong>formation.<br />
Oryzabase also supports users by allow<strong>in</strong>g them to<br />
deposit mutant images us<strong>in</strong>g the onl<strong>in</strong>e submission system.<br />
Fundamental knowledge on rice science<br />
This feature <strong>in</strong>troduces basic rice science knowledge to students.<br />
The current contents <strong>in</strong>clude (1) species and distribution<br />
of wild and cultivated rice <strong>in</strong> the world, (2) rice morphology,<br />
(3) rice mutants, (4) genetic map of rice, (5) rice chromosomes,<br />
and (6) rice cultivation.<br />
Genomics 381
Fig. 2. Spotted leaf 1 gene <strong>in</strong>formation with mutant images retrieved from the gene dictionary.<br />
References<br />
Causse MA, Fulton TM, Cho YG, Ahn SN, Chunwongse J, Wu K,<br />
Xiao J, Yu Z, Ronald PC, Harr<strong>in</strong>gton SE, Second G, McCouch<br />
SR, Tanksley SD. 1994. Saturated molecular map of the rice<br />
genome based on an <strong>in</strong>terspecific backcross population. <strong>Genetics</strong><br />
138:1251-1274.<br />
Harushima Y, Yano M, Shomura A, Sato M, Shimano T, Kuboki Y,<br />
Yamamoto T, Liu S-Y, Antonio BA, Parco A, Kajiya H, Huang<br />
N, Yamamoto K, Nagamura Y, Kurata N, Khush GS, Sasaki<br />
T. 1998. A high-density rice genetic l<strong>in</strong>kage map with 2275<br />
markers us<strong>in</strong>g a s<strong>in</strong>gle F 2 population. <strong>Genetics</strong> 148:479-494.<br />
K<strong>in</strong>oshita T. 1995. Report of committee on gene symbolization:<br />
nomenclature and l<strong>in</strong>kage groups. <strong>Rice</strong> Genet. Newsl. 12:9-<br />
153.<br />
Kurata N, Umehara Y, Tanoue H, Sasaki T. 1997. Physical mapp<strong>in</strong>g<br />
of the rice genome with YAC clones. Plant Mol. Biol. 35:101-<br />
113.<br />
Tsunematsu H, Yoshimura A, Harushima Y, Nagamura Y, Kurata N,<br />
Yano M, Sasaki T, Iwata N. 1996. RFLP framework us<strong>in</strong>g<br />
recomb<strong>in</strong>ant <strong>in</strong>bred l<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong> rice. Breed. Sci. 46:279-284.<br />
Yoshimura A, Ideta O, Iwata N. 1997. L<strong>in</strong>kage map of phenotype<br />
and RFLP markers <strong>in</strong> rice. Plant Mol. Biol. 35:49-60.<br />
382 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
Fig. 3. Mutant phenotype collection of Oryzabase.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ addresses: Y. Yamazaki and N. Kurata, National Institute<br />
of <strong>Genetics</strong>, Mishima, Shizouka, 411-8540, Japan; A.<br />
Yoshimura, Kyushu University, Hakozaki, Higashi-ku,<br />
Fukuoka, 812-8581, Japan; Y. Nagato, University of Tokyo,<br />
Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8657, Japan.<br />
Acknowledgments: We thank T. Yamakawa, K. Mitsui, K. Watanabe,<br />
and M. Saito (National Institute of <strong>Genetics</strong>) for technical<br />
assistance.<br />
Genomics 383
<strong>Rice</strong>Genes 5.0: an onl<strong>in</strong>e genomic resource<br />
for the rice community<br />
A.M. Baldo, G.A. DeClerck, T.G. Cargioli, I.V. Yap, C.M. Larota, S. Cart<strong>in</strong>hour, and S.R. McCouch<br />
<strong>Rice</strong>Genes (http://ars-genome.cornell.edu/rice) is a publicly accessible genome database developed and curated by the USDA-<br />
ARS. It serves as a resource for the <strong>in</strong>ternational rice research community by provid<strong>in</strong>g a collection of 11 rice genetic maps<br />
from a variety of sources, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g Cornell University, the Japanese <strong>Rice</strong> Genome Research Program (JRGP), the Korea <strong>Rice</strong><br />
Genome Research Program (KRGP), and Ch<strong>in</strong>ese researchers. <strong>Rice</strong>Genes also documents comparisons with maps from other<br />
grasses (maize, oat, wheat, and soon sorghum and wild rice). We have begun add<strong>in</strong>g connections between genetic markers<br />
and available rice BAC and PAC sequences identified by TIGR. In addition to <strong>in</strong>formation on molecular and morphological<br />
markers, <strong>Rice</strong>Genes conta<strong>in</strong>s QTLs, photographs of mutant phenotypes, and hot l<strong>in</strong>ks to GenBank, Oryzabase, and other onl<strong>in</strong>e<br />
resources. Molecular markers developed at Cornell University can be referenced and requested via the associated Web site at<br />
Cornell. The <strong>Rice</strong>Genes team is also <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> develop<strong>in</strong>g new tools for rice genomic research to aid <strong>in</strong> SSR identification<br />
(SSRIT, http://ars-genome.cornell.edu/rice/tools.html). <strong>Rice</strong>Genes is accessible on the Web at http://ars-genome.cornell.edu/<br />
rice. The KRGP also provides <strong>Rice</strong>Genes <strong>in</strong> the form of a CD-ROM for Mac<strong>in</strong>tosh and W<strong>in</strong>dows.<br />
Genetic maps are the central focus of <strong>Rice</strong>Genes 5.0. While<br />
sequences, genomic clones, QTLs, phenotypic traits, and references<br />
are <strong>in</strong>cluded, each of these items conta<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong>formation<br />
that is directly or <strong>in</strong>directly related to the maps and markers <strong>in</strong><br />
the database. The references and sequences <strong>in</strong>cluded are not<br />
exhaustive collections of all such resources available for rice,<br />
but are a selection relevant to mapp<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
<strong>Rice</strong>Genes 5.0 conta<strong>in</strong>s 11 rice genetic maps: BS125/<br />
WL02 (Causse et al 1994), Nipponbare/Kasalath (Kurata et al<br />
1994), AijiaoNante/P16 (Xiong et al 1997), Milyang23/<br />
Gihobyeo (Cho et al 1998), Morphological (K<strong>in</strong>oshita 1998),<br />
Nipponbare/Kasalath (Harushima et al 1998), ZhaiYeQ<strong>in</strong>g8/<br />
J<strong>in</strong>Xi (Shen et al 1998), <strong>Rice</strong>-Wilson (Wilson et al 1999),<br />
BS125/WL02 (Susan R. McCouch and Sandra Harr<strong>in</strong>gton,<br />
pers. commun. 2000), IR64/Azucena (Temnykh et al 2000),<br />
and a rice consensus map (Susan R. McCouch, personal communication,<br />
1997). A comparative map of maize is also available<br />
(Wilson et al 1999).<br />
Data classes<br />
The variety of biological data types and technologies available<br />
for genetic mapp<strong>in</strong>g necessitates an <strong>in</strong>tegrated approach<br />
to database structure. In the current version of <strong>Rice</strong>Genes, we<br />
have adopted a new approach to def<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g and organiz<strong>in</strong>g some<br />
of our data classes.<br />
Marker<br />
Rather than treat<strong>in</strong>g probes, prote<strong>in</strong>-cod<strong>in</strong>g genes, and s<strong>in</strong>glegene<br />
morphological phenotypes as separate k<strong>in</strong>ds of entities,<br />
we have def<strong>in</strong>ed a “marker” as any technology or technique<br />
that allows one to observe morphological or molecular phenotypes<br />
for genetic mapp<strong>in</strong>g. A marker may be of any one of<br />
seven designated types: morphological or molecular (AFLP,<br />
RFLP, RAPD, isozyme, microsatellite, STS). The fields present<br />
<strong>in</strong> a marker record depend on which type of marker a record<br />
represents, and the technologies <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> its use. In this<br />
way, we have enabled queries across all of the types of data<br />
that have been used to generate the maps <strong>in</strong> the database.<br />
Locus<br />
In <strong>Rice</strong>Genes 5.0, a “locus” is def<strong>in</strong>ed as a specific position<br />
on a specific map associated with a marker. Many markers<br />
have been identified as mapp<strong>in</strong>g to more than one position <strong>in</strong><br />
the rice genome. For example, RG634 has been mapped to<br />
l<strong>in</strong>kage groups 2, 7, 5, and 12 <strong>in</strong> various studies. The conventional<br />
way to handle this is to append “A” to the marker name<br />
for one position and “B” for the second position, and so on; <strong>in</strong><br />
some cases, this has been carried out to a sixth locus with “F,”<br />
such as <strong>in</strong> G1184F and L363F. In other cases, the authors have<br />
simply designated all of the loci with an “X.”<br />
In approximately 50 cases, loci from different mapp<strong>in</strong>g<br />
studies have the same name but are reported <strong>in</strong> different l<strong>in</strong>kage<br />
groups. The potential locus nam<strong>in</strong>g confusion is compounded<br />
by the fact that approximately 80 markers have been<br />
used to identify loci that have been assigned different names<br />
<strong>in</strong> various studies. In addition, 58 markers map to different<br />
positions on the same l<strong>in</strong>kage group <strong>in</strong> eight studies. Differences<br />
<strong>in</strong> locus names on the same l<strong>in</strong>kage group are much<br />
harder to identify by a simple query. Rather than risk <strong>in</strong>appropriately<br />
merg<strong>in</strong>g data represent<strong>in</strong>g different biological entities,<br />
we have chosen to append the l<strong>in</strong>kage group and a fourcharacter<br />
map study code to each locus. In this way, for example,<br />
we can differentiate loci: G24-11RJ94, G24A-11RJ98,<br />
G24B-11RJ98, G24A-11RS98, and G24B-11RS98. The<br />
Map_Help record <strong>in</strong> the database provides a table of the map<br />
studies and their codes.<br />
Trait<br />
In rebuild<strong>in</strong>g <strong>Rice</strong>Genes, we have paid particular attention to<br />
organiz<strong>in</strong>g phenotypic traits, which are shared by morphological<br />
markers and QTLs. To enable brows<strong>in</strong>g accord<strong>in</strong>g to trait,<br />
384 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
we have def<strong>in</strong>ed 10 overlapp<strong>in</strong>g trait categories called<br />
“trait_types” <strong>in</strong> the database. The trait “head<strong>in</strong>g date,” for example,<br />
is cross-listed under trait types “maturity,” “plant architecture,”<br />
and “yield and yield components.” QTL colors on<br />
the consensus maps are assigned from a trait type <strong>in</strong> which the<br />
QTL trait falls. A head<strong>in</strong>g date QTL, for example, is colored<br />
orange, which is the color designated for the maturity trait type.<br />
Map views are provided to allow the user to view all QTLs <strong>in</strong><br />
a particular trait category regardless of the designated color.<br />
We have also developed a set of codes for QTL traits, extend<strong>in</strong>g<br />
the current nam<strong>in</strong>g convention for greater uniformity. A<br />
table of these codes is available <strong>in</strong> the QTL_Help record <strong>in</strong> the<br />
database.<br />
QTLs<br />
Quantitative trait loci (QTLs) are a deceptively complex class<br />
of data to represent accurately <strong>in</strong> a database. Multiple methods<br />
are available for statistically identify<strong>in</strong>g their presence and location,<br />
with different standards for the significance threshold.<br />
A study population may be derived from a complex breed<strong>in</strong>g<br />
strategy and may be grown <strong>in</strong> several different locations. The<br />
set of markers used may be from one or two standard sources<br />
and often <strong>in</strong>cludes unique markers developed for the study,<br />
which are not present <strong>in</strong> any other mapp<strong>in</strong>g study.<br />
In <strong>Rice</strong>Genes 5.0, we have attempted as much as possible<br />
to faithfully represent the <strong>in</strong>formation reported <strong>in</strong> a QTL<br />
study while ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g uniformity for query<strong>in</strong>g purposes.<br />
Several conventions were adopted to accomplish this. A phenotype<br />
is strictly def<strong>in</strong>ed as an <strong>in</strong>teraction between genetics<br />
and environment, whereas a “QTL study” <strong>in</strong> the database is<br />
def<strong>in</strong>ed as a breed<strong>in</strong>g experiment us<strong>in</strong>g a s<strong>in</strong>gle population <strong>in</strong><br />
a s<strong>in</strong>gle location. Studies across environments or populations<br />
published <strong>in</strong> a s<strong>in</strong>gle reference are treated <strong>in</strong>dividually <strong>in</strong> the<br />
database and are l<strong>in</strong>ked to each other through a common published<br />
reference.<br />
The various statistics that are reported as evidence of a<br />
QTL are each stored <strong>in</strong> a separate field. This strategy enables<br />
storage and query<strong>in</strong>g of ANOVA statistics alongside <strong>in</strong>terval<br />
and composite <strong>in</strong>terval analysis values, regardless of the comb<strong>in</strong>ation<br />
of these methods reported <strong>in</strong> an <strong>in</strong>dividual study. To<br />
facilitate the appropriate display of a QTL, we wrote a simple<br />
<strong>in</strong>-house tool that can determ<strong>in</strong>e the ends given a pair of loci<br />
for each QTL and a genetic map. In <strong>Rice</strong>Genes 5.0, for <strong>in</strong>stance,<br />
we have displayed a QTL on a 1997 consensus map,<br />
which, among the 11 maps <strong>in</strong> the database, has the most comprehensive<br />
collection of markers used for QTL analysis. In<br />
pr<strong>in</strong>ciple, an ideal map for this purpose would <strong>in</strong>clude all of<br />
the current morphological, Cornell, and JRGP markers.<br />
Features<br />
To aid the user <strong>in</strong> navigat<strong>in</strong>g and query<strong>in</strong>g the database, we<br />
have added two new features. A context-specific help system<br />
has been implemented for major data classes <strong>in</strong> which can be<br />
found a strict def<strong>in</strong>ition of the class, an explanation of the fields<br />
available <strong>in</strong> the class, and a sample query for access<strong>in</strong>g data <strong>in</strong><br />
the class. At the bottom of each data record <strong>in</strong> a documented<br />
class, there is a clickable l<strong>in</strong>k that will take the user to the<br />
appropriate explanation. Also, the onl<strong>in</strong>e version of <strong>Rice</strong>Genes<br />
5.0 has a fairly extensive collection of “QuickQueries” for<br />
comon types of data searches (http://ars-genome.cornell.edu/<br />
rice/quickqueries.html). There are <strong>in</strong>structions for modify<strong>in</strong>g<br />
the query parameters if the user desires a slightly different<br />
comb<strong>in</strong>ation of data.<br />
References<br />
Causse MA, Fulton TM, Cho YG, Ahn SN, Chunwongse J, Wu K,<br />
Xiao J, Yu Z, Ronald PC, Harr<strong>in</strong>gton SE, Second G, McCouch<br />
SR, Tanksley SD. 1994. Saturated molecular map of the rice<br />
genome based on an <strong>in</strong>terspecific backcross population. <strong>Genetics</strong><br />
138:1251-1274.<br />
Cho YG, McCouch SR, Kuiper M, Kang MR, Pot J, Groenen JTM,<br />
Eun MY. 1998. Integrated map of AFLP, SSLP, and RFLP<br />
markers us<strong>in</strong>g a recomb<strong>in</strong>ant <strong>in</strong>bred population of rice (Oryza<br />
sativa L.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 97:370-380.<br />
Harushima Y, Yano M, Shomura A, Sato M, Shimano T, Kuboki Y,<br />
Yamamoto T, L<strong>in</strong> SY, Antonio BA, Parco A, Kajiya H, Huang<br />
N, Yamamoto K, Nagamura Y, Kurata N, Khush GS, Sasaki<br />
T. 1998. A high-density rice genetic l<strong>in</strong>kage map with 2275<br />
markers us<strong>in</strong>g a s<strong>in</strong>gle F 2 population. <strong>Genetics</strong> 148:479-494.<br />
K<strong>in</strong>oshita T. 1998. L<strong>in</strong>kage mapp<strong>in</strong>g us<strong>in</strong>g mutant genes <strong>in</strong> rice.<br />
<strong>Rice</strong> Genet. Newsl. 15:13-74.<br />
Kurata N, Nagamura Y, Yamamoto K, Harushima Y, Sue N, Wu J,<br />
Antonio BA, Shomura A, Shimizu T, L<strong>in</strong> SY, Inoue T, Fukuda<br />
A, Shimano T, Kuboki Y, Toyama T, Miyamoto Y, Kirihara T,<br />
Hayasaka K, Miyao A, Monna L, Zhong HS, Tamura Y, Wang<br />
ZX, Momma T, Umehara Y, Yano M, Sasaki T, M<strong>in</strong>obe Y.<br />
1994. A 300-kilobase <strong>in</strong>terval genetic map of rice <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g<br />
883 expressed sequences. Nat. Genet. 8:365-372.<br />
Shen LS, He P, Xu YB, Tan ZB, Lu CF, Zhu LH. 1998. Genetic<br />
molecular l<strong>in</strong>kage map construction and genome analysis of<br />
rice doubled haploid population. Acta Bot. S<strong>in</strong>. 40:1115-1122.<br />
Temnykh S, Park WD, Ayres NM, Cart<strong>in</strong>hour S, Hauck N, Lipovich<br />
L, Cho YG, Ishii T, McCouch SR. 2000. Mapp<strong>in</strong>g and genome<br />
organization of microsatellite sequences <strong>in</strong> rice (Oryza<br />
sativa L.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 100:697-712.<br />
Wilson WA, Harr<strong>in</strong>gton SE, Woodman WL, Lee M, Sorrells ME,<br />
McCouch SR. 1999. Inferences on the genome structure of<br />
progenitor maize through comparative analysis of rice, maize,<br />
and the domesticated Panicoids. <strong>Genetics</strong> 153:453-473.<br />
Xiong L, Liu KD, Dai XK, Wang SW, Xu CG, Zhang DP, Maroof<br />
MAS, Sasaki T, Zhang Q. 1997. A high-density RFLP map<br />
based on the F 2 population of a cross between Oryza sativa<br />
and O. rufipogon us<strong>in</strong>g Cornell and RGP markers. <strong>Rice</strong> Genet.<br />
Newsl. 14:110-116.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ addresses: A.M. Baldo, S. Cart<strong>in</strong>hour, United States Department<br />
of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Center<br />
for Agricultural Bio<strong>in</strong>formatics; G.A. DeClerk, I.V. Yap,<br />
C.M. Larota, S.R. McCouch, Department of Plant Breed<strong>in</strong>g;<br />
T.G. Cargioli, Department of Agricultural and Biological Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g,<br />
Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, USA.<br />
Genomics 385
Acknowledgments: The authors acknowledge the USDA-ARS for<br />
fund<strong>in</strong>g the work, the members of the McCouch laboratory<br />
for their <strong>in</strong>tellectual contribution and expertise, Dr. David<br />
Matthews and Maria Nemchuk for their generous assistance<br />
and support <strong>in</strong> the software development, and Jim<strong>in</strong>g Li and<br />
Jordan Hay for their assistance with translation and data entry.<br />
CD-ROM for PC version of <strong>Rice</strong>Genes, a rice-specific ACEDB<br />
Y.C. Sh<strong>in</strong>, T.H. Lee, M.Y. Eun, and B.H. Nahm<br />
For personal use <strong>in</strong> the stand-alone mode of database <strong>Rice</strong>Genes, a rice-specific ACEDB database operat<strong>in</strong>g under a Unix<br />
system has been ported to <strong>Rice</strong>W<strong>in</strong>, a W<strong>in</strong>dows version of <strong>Rice</strong>Genes. The CD-ROM that can be run on an IBM-compatible PC<br />
is released. <strong>Rice</strong>W<strong>in</strong> is developed based on the W<strong>in</strong>Ace program for W<strong>in</strong>dows 95/98 and requires at least 16 MB of RAM with<br />
the data of <strong>Rice</strong>Genes. The database <strong>in</strong>cludes <strong>in</strong>formation about 2,668 authors, 71,695 DNAs, 113 gene products, 1,254<br />
genotypes, 252 journals, 4,783 loci, 853 images, 129 maps, 39 multimaps, 1,464 papers, 21,841 probes, 457 quantitative<br />
trait loci, and 94,150 sequences. The <strong>Rice</strong>W<strong>in</strong> program is available <strong>in</strong> two formats—compressed and CD-ROM. The compressed<br />
format is stuffed as a self-extracted file and will be automatically extracted with execution. The compressed format can<br />
be downloaded at the ftp site of Myongji Bioserver (http://bio.myongji.ac.kr) and NAL, USDA (ftp://probe.nalusda.gov/pub/<br />
ricegenes). The 2X CD-ROM conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>Rice</strong>W<strong>in</strong> is available free of charge upon written request. The current version of the<br />
program is 4.5.3.<br />
Progress <strong>in</strong> genome research on various organisms around the<br />
world has resulted <strong>in</strong> the rapid and massive accumulation of<br />
bio<strong>in</strong>formation. Therefore, the use of a bio<strong>in</strong>formation database<br />
via a computer network has become very important to<br />
retrieve data of <strong>in</strong>terest and biologically related <strong>in</strong>formation.<br />
Huge sizes of data are collected <strong>in</strong> databases such as GenBank<br />
(GenBank 2000) and EBI (EBI 2000). The <strong>in</strong>formation on and<br />
analysis of sequences are available from the database and analysis<br />
network. However, this sequence <strong>in</strong>formation is collected<br />
regardless of the organism and it is not easy for users to comb<strong>in</strong>e<br />
the biologically related data <strong>in</strong> any specific organism because<br />
of the lack of an <strong>in</strong>tegrated database system. To overcome<br />
these difficulties, a sophisticated network<strong>in</strong>g of databases<br />
is developed with the help of hypertext, which l<strong>in</strong>ks various<br />
types of data such as DNA, prote<strong>in</strong>, and references to retrieve<br />
related data such as that provided <strong>in</strong> Entrez (Entrez<br />
2000).<br />
The schematic diagram for the current flow of<br />
bio<strong>in</strong>formation is described <strong>in</strong> Figure 1. Bio<strong>in</strong>formation such<br />
as DNA, prote<strong>in</strong>, and references is cross-l<strong>in</strong>ked and retrieved<br />
accord<strong>in</strong>g to users’ requests through the search system, Entrez<br />
Browser, provided by GenBank <strong>in</strong> collaboration with<br />
Prote<strong>in</strong>DB and Medl<strong>in</strong>e databases. With the recent <strong>in</strong>creased<br />
capacity of the network, sequences can be analyzed for homology<br />
with BLAST and FASTA, with cross l<strong>in</strong>ks to the analysis<br />
program. Also, with the development of graphic <strong>in</strong>terface<br />
technology, graphic presentations of the sequence <strong>in</strong>formation<br />
have been made possible.<br />
As one of the powerful worldwide bio<strong>in</strong>formation networks,<br />
ACEDB (A Caenorhabditis elegans Database) WWW<br />
Server (ACEDB server) has been developed. Whatever type<br />
of distribution media is used, the ma<strong>in</strong> database software is<br />
called “ACEDB” database for the organization of<br />
bio<strong>in</strong>formation such as DNA, prote<strong>in</strong> sequences, QTL maps,<br />
loci, probes, polymorphisms, metabolic pathways, and related<br />
images.<br />
ACEDB, the database software<br />
ACEDB was developed by Richard Durb<strong>in</strong> and Jean Thierry-<br />
Mieg (Durb<strong>in</strong> and Thierry-Mieg 1991). However, with the<br />
application of the database software to organize molecular biology<br />
data about genomes of diverse species, it refers to the<br />
database software alone. The database software was orig<strong>in</strong>ally<br />
written <strong>in</strong> C language for the Unix system and the current Unix<br />
version is 4.5. The software is available as source code and<br />
b<strong>in</strong>ary format for a variety of workstation levels and other personal<br />
computers (Table 1).<br />
Structure of ACEDB<br />
A major current trend <strong>in</strong> computer languages and database<br />
design is “object-oriented” systems. The ACEDB developers<br />
are try<strong>in</strong>g to build system-organiz<strong>in</strong>g biological data <strong>in</strong>to objects<br />
and classes. In particular, there is neither class hierarchy<br />
nor <strong>in</strong>heritance. Data are written <strong>in</strong> a modular but<br />
nonideological way <strong>in</strong> straight C. However, display and disk<br />
storage methods are class-dependent.<br />
ACEDB does not use an underly<strong>in</strong>g relational database<br />
schema but a system <strong>in</strong> which data are stored <strong>in</strong> objects that<br />
belong <strong>in</strong> classes. This is nevertheless a general database man-<br />
386 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
AGIS<br />
(NAL, USDA)<br />
Plant Genome<br />
Animal Genome<br />
Microorg. Genome<br />
A<br />
C<br />
E<br />
D<br />
B<br />
E<br />
ntrez<br />
DNA DB<br />
GenBank, EMBL, DDBJ<br />
Prote<strong>in</strong> DB<br />
Swiss PR, PIR, PDB<br />
Reference DB<br />
Medl<strong>in</strong>e, Patent<br />
ACeDB<br />
MycDB<br />
21DB<br />
XDB<br />
User<br />
AAtDB<br />
Treegenes<br />
PigBase<br />
BovGBase<br />
Korea <strong>Rice</strong><br />
Genome Server<br />
Gra<strong>in</strong>Genes<br />
MaizeDB<br />
<strong>Rice</strong>Genes<br />
<strong>Rice</strong>Genes<br />
<strong>Rice</strong>W<strong>in</strong><br />
Fig. 1. A schematic diagram<br />
for the current flow of<br />
bio<strong>in</strong>formation.<br />
Table 1. Current version and support<strong>in</strong>g system for the ACEDB program.<br />
Version Support<strong>in</strong>g system Available FTP site<br />
Unix (ACEDB 4.5) Sun/Solaris ftp://lirmm.lirmm.fr <strong>in</strong> pub/acedb<br />
IBM RS-6000<br />
ftp://cele.mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk <strong>in</strong> pub/acedb<br />
L<strong>in</strong>ux PC 386/486/Pentium with L<strong>in</strong>ux ftp://bio<strong>in</strong>formatics.weizmann.ac.il <strong>in</strong> pub/databases/acedb.<br />
PC W<strong>in</strong>dows 95/98 ftp://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov <strong>in</strong> repository/acedb<br />
agement system us<strong>in</strong>g caches, session control, and a powerful<br />
query language. Typical objects are clones, genes, alleles, papers,<br />
sequences, etc. Each object is stored as a tree, follow<strong>in</strong>g<br />
a hierarchical structure for the class—called the “model.” Maps<br />
are derived from data stored <strong>in</strong> tree objects but precomputed<br />
and stored as tables for efficiency. The system of models allows<br />
flexibility and efficiency of storage. Miss<strong>in</strong>g data are not<br />
stored.<br />
A major advantage is that the models can be extended<br />
and ref<strong>in</strong>ed without <strong>in</strong>validat<strong>in</strong>g an exist<strong>in</strong>g database. Comments<br />
can be added to any node of an object. In some ways,<br />
class hierarchy is replaced by a system of models and trees,<br />
which seems to be rather unusual. This system is very natural<br />
for the representation of biological <strong>in</strong>formation, where, for<br />
some members of a class, a lot might be known about some<br />
aspects, but, for most, only a little is known.<br />
Application of the ACEDB program<br />
The ma<strong>in</strong> characteristics of the ACEDB program are that it is<br />
organism-specific and object-oriented. The program provides<br />
not only the retrieval DNA and prote<strong>in</strong> sequences and references<br />
but also probe <strong>in</strong>formation l<strong>in</strong>ked to loci on the map and<br />
related polymorphism, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g blot and mutant phenotype<br />
images and various mapp<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>formation as raw data. The<br />
ACEDB system is focused on l<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g the bio<strong>in</strong>formation related<br />
to any specific organism.<br />
Many organism-specific, diverse versions of the ACEDB<br />
have been developed. All the organism-specific databases are<br />
us<strong>in</strong>g the same software. However, the developers modified<br />
the model, def<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g a hierarchical structure for the class <strong>in</strong> the<br />
construction of the database accord<strong>in</strong>g to organism characteristics<br />
and type of data available. The list of current organismspecific<br />
ACEDB servers, species, and sites for them is given<br />
<strong>in</strong> Table 2. The <strong>in</strong>formation and management of the ACEDB<br />
database are described at the home page of the ACEDB server.<br />
Support for ACEDB servers<br />
To support the management of the ACEDB, the AGIS server<br />
at the NAL, USDA, provides tools for <strong>in</strong>tegrat<strong>in</strong>g version<br />
ACEDB with Perl and the World Wide Web. A WWW <strong>in</strong>terface<br />
to 4.5 and <strong>in</strong>structions for this <strong>in</strong>terface are available at a<br />
WWW server (Matthews 2000). As support<strong>in</strong>g groups, there<br />
are newsgroups, such as bionet.software.acedb and a USENET/<br />
Biosci conference titled “bionet.software.acedb” for discussion<br />
about the ACEDB. To participate <strong>in</strong> the conference by e-<br />
mail, subscribe to biosci-server@net.bio.net with no subject<br />
l<strong>in</strong>e and only the message “subscribe ACEDB-SOFT” <strong>in</strong> the<br />
body. To unsubscribe, send the message “unsubscribe ACEDB-<br />
SOFT” to the same address. After subscrib<strong>in</strong>g, any messages<br />
(<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g your e-mail sent to acedb@net.bio.nef) will be distributed<br />
automatically to all subscribers and to the electronic<br />
conference. All of the articles <strong>in</strong> biosci.software.acedb are<br />
archived by Biosci (www.bio.net/archives.html).<br />
Genomics 387
Table 2. Diverse organism-specific ACEDB servers.<br />
Database<br />
AaeDB<br />
AAtDB<br />
AceDB<br />
BarleyDB<br />
BeneGenes<br />
BrassicaDB<br />
CassavaDB<br />
ChlamyDB<br />
DictyDB<br />
Ecosys<br />
FoodplantDB<br />
MaizeDB<br />
MPNADB<br />
PathoGenes<br />
<strong>Rice</strong>Blast<br />
<strong>Rice</strong>Genes<br />
SolGenes<br />
SorghumDB<br />
SoyBase<br />
TreeGenes<br />
Species<br />
Aedes aegypti (mosquito)<br />
Arabidopsis thaliana<br />
Caenorhabditis elegans<br />
Hordeum<br />
Phaseolus, Vigna<br />
Brassica napus<br />
Manihot esculenta Crantz<br />
Chlamydomonas<br />
Dictyostelium<br />
Plant ecological ranges<br />
Native American food plants<br />
Zea<br />
Medic<strong>in</strong>al plants of native America<br />
Cereal pathogens<br />
Magnaporthe grisea<br />
Oryza<br />
Lycopersicon, Solanum, etc.<br />
Sorghum<br />
Glyc<strong>in</strong>e max<br />
Forest trees<br />
URL or contact<br />
http://klab.agsci.colostate.edu/<br />
http://genome-www.stanford.edu/<br />
http://www.sanger.ac.uk/Projects/C_elegans/<strong>in</strong>dex.shtml<br />
http://synteny.nott.ac.uk/barley.html<br />
http://beangenes.cws.ndsu.nodak.edu/<br />
http://synteny.nott.ac.uk/brassica.html<br />
http://www.ciat.cgiar.org/projects/ip-3.htm<br />
http://www.botany.duke.edu/chlamy/<br />
http://www-biology.ucsd.edu/others/dsmith/dictydb.html<br />
http://ars-genome.cornell.edu/Botany/aboutecosys.html<br />
http://ars-genome.cornell.edu/Botany/aboutfoodplantdb.html<br />
http://www.agron.missouri.edu/<br />
http://ars-genome.cornell.edu/Botany/aboutmpnadb.html<br />
http://ars-genome.cornell.edu/aboutpathogenes.html<br />
http://ascus.cit.cornell.edu/blastdb/<br />
http://ars-genome.cornell.edu/rice/<br />
http://ars-genome.cornell.edu/solgenes/<br />
http://algodon.tamu.edu/sorghumdb.html<br />
http://129.186.26.94/<br />
http://dendrome.ucdavis.edu/<br />
<strong>Rice</strong>Genes<br />
<strong>Rice</strong>Genes is one of the diverse, organism-specific DB versions<br />
of the ACEDB program. The ACEDB is <strong>in</strong>stalled <strong>in</strong> a<br />
Unix mach<strong>in</strong>e. Because biologists have difficulty ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />
the Unix mach<strong>in</strong>e, data from <strong>Rice</strong>Genes are usually extracted<br />
from the ACEDB server. The <strong>Rice</strong>Genes WWW server is supported<br />
at the ACEDB server of NAL, USDA, while ftp and<br />
Gopher servers are directed by Susan McCouch and curated<br />
by Angela Baldo at USDA-ARS CBCG (<strong>Rice</strong>Genes 2000).<br />
Also, the Korean rice genome server at the National Institute<br />
of Agricultural Science and Technology, Rural Development<br />
Adm<strong>in</strong>istration, Suwon, Korea, serves as the mirror site of<br />
<strong>Rice</strong>Genes (Mirror 2000). The current version is 4.5.<br />
<strong>Rice</strong>Genes provides 32 classes such as author, DNA, gene product,<br />
image, journal, locus, map, probe, sequence, etc.<br />
At the beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g of the program provided by the WWW<br />
server for <strong>Rice</strong>Genes <strong>in</strong> browse mode, the selection menu for<br />
the category will be given <strong>in</strong> the table menu screen of the class.<br />
When the requested class is selected, the object of <strong>in</strong>terest can<br />
be selected <strong>in</strong> the sublist or full-list menu, as an example of<br />
sequence. In text format requested sequence <strong>in</strong>formation, various<br />
objects underl<strong>in</strong>ed are l<strong>in</strong>ked and related <strong>in</strong>formation can<br />
be retrieved from <strong>in</strong>ternal and external databases such as <strong>in</strong><br />
EMBL, GenBank and Sequence Analysis Tools, or Enzyme<br />
Database by click<strong>in</strong>g the given letter. By select<strong>in</strong>g the probe<br />
or polymorphism, the probe <strong>in</strong>formation and related polymorphic<br />
Southern blot image can be obta<strong>in</strong>ed.<br />
<strong>Rice</strong>W<strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>Rice</strong>W<strong>in</strong>, developed as part of the Korean <strong>Rice</strong> Genome Research<br />
Program, is the W<strong>in</strong>dows 95/98 version of <strong>Rice</strong>Genes.<br />
<strong>Rice</strong>W<strong>in</strong> is developed for W<strong>in</strong>dows 95/98 based on<br />
W<strong>in</strong>Ace4.5.6-beta (Bruskiewich 1998). It has 16 Mbytes of<br />
RAM and 256 colors. <strong>Rice</strong>W<strong>in</strong> is available <strong>in</strong> two formats—<br />
one is the CD-ROM version, which is available free of charge<br />
upon written request; the other form is for download<strong>in</strong>g from<br />
the ftp site. The files are available <strong>in</strong> zip formats. The compressed<br />
formats are available at the ftp sites of the Korean rice<br />
genome server and <strong>Rice</strong>Genes server at NAL, USDA.<br />
<strong>Rice</strong>W<strong>in</strong> is developed for those who do not have network<br />
access and is dedicated for personal use. It conta<strong>in</strong>s the<br />
same data as those <strong>in</strong> <strong>Rice</strong>Genes with the same version. The<br />
program can be started by click<strong>in</strong>g “<strong>Rice</strong>Genes 4.5.3” <strong>in</strong> the<br />
ACEDB chooser program and click<strong>in</strong>g the class and objects<br />
and l<strong>in</strong>ked follow<strong>in</strong>g objects. The objects l<strong>in</strong>ked to classes such<br />
as locus on the map, its sequences, authors, related papers,<br />
and others are retrieved <strong>in</strong> the same way as <strong>in</strong> <strong>Rice</strong>Genes.<br />
However, <strong>in</strong> <strong>Rice</strong>W<strong>in</strong>, all the objects l<strong>in</strong>ked are shown on the<br />
monitor as multiple w<strong>in</strong>dows.<br />
The first version, <strong>Rice</strong>Mac 4.1.1, was released <strong>in</strong> May<br />
1996 and updated to 4.1.2 <strong>in</strong> November 1996. The CD-ROM<br />
version was released from <strong>Rice</strong>Mac 4.1.2. The CD-ROM title<br />
of the current version of <strong>Rice</strong>Genes 4.5.3, released <strong>in</strong> January<br />
2000, conta<strong>in</strong>ed the W<strong>in</strong>dows 95/98 version of the three databases:<br />
<strong>Rice</strong>W<strong>in</strong> 4.5.3, W<strong>in</strong>Gra<strong>in</strong>Genes (Gra<strong>in</strong>Genes 1998), and<br />
<strong>Rice</strong>Blast 2.0 (<strong>Rice</strong>BlastDB 1998) titled “<strong>Rice</strong>Genes,<br />
Gra<strong>in</strong>Genes, <strong>Rice</strong>Blast” <strong>in</strong> collaboration with DB groups of<br />
<strong>Rice</strong>Genes, Gra<strong>in</strong>Genes, and <strong>Rice</strong>Blast. <strong>Rice</strong>W<strong>in</strong> will be updated<br />
with the release of <strong>Rice</strong>Genes.<br />
References<br />
ACEDB and ACEDB WWW servers. http://ars-genome.cornell.<br />
edu/, http://www.acedb.org/.<br />
Bruskiewich R. 1998. www.acedb.org/W<strong>in</strong>Ace.shtml, ftp://<br />
ftp.sanger.ac.uk /pub/acedb/w<strong>in</strong>ace.<br />
388 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
Durb<strong>in</strong> R, Thierry-Mieg J. 1991. A C. elegans database: ftp://<br />
lirmm.lirmm.fr, ftp://cele.mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk, ftp://<br />
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.<br />
EBI (European Bio<strong>in</strong>formatics Institute). EMBL 2000.<br />
www.ebi.ac.uk/.<br />
Entrez. 2000. The NCBI WWW Entrez browser.<br />
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Entrez/.<br />
GenBank. 2000. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Genbank/<strong>in</strong>dex.html.<br />
Gra<strong>in</strong>Genes. 1998. Wheat, barley, oat, sugarcane and relatives, data<br />
version 1.8. http://wheat.pw.usda.gov/, ftp://arsgenome.cornell.edu/pub/Gra<strong>in</strong>Genes/.<br />
Matthews DE. 2000. Frequently asked questions about ACEDB:<br />
http://ars-genome.cornell.edu/acedocs/acedbfaq.html.<br />
Mirror (Korean rice genome server at NIAST, RDA, and at Myongji<br />
University). 2000. www.niast.go.kr/NIAST/Services/<br />
<strong>Rice</strong>Genome.html, http://bio.myongji.ac.kr/ricemac4.html.<br />
<strong>Rice</strong>BlastDB. 1998. A database for the rice blast fungus,<br />
Magnaporthe grisea, data version 2.0:http://<br />
ascus.cit.cornell.edu/blastdb/, ftp://ascus.cit.cornell.edu/pub/<br />
blastdb/.<br />
<strong>Rice</strong>Genes. 2000. http://ars-genome.cornell.edu/rice/, ftp://arsgenome.cornell.edu/pub/<strong>Rice</strong>Genes.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ addresses: Y.C. Sh<strong>in</strong>, T.H. Lee, and B.H. Nahm, Department<br />
of Biological Science, Myongji University, Yong<strong>in</strong> 449-<br />
728, Korea; M.Y. Eun, Department of Cytogenetics, National<br />
Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology, Suwon 441-<br />
707, Korea.<br />
Perform<strong>in</strong>g l<strong>in</strong>e × tester analysis with the SAS® system<br />
V.I. Bartolome and G.B. Gregorio<br />
Plant breeders use l<strong>in</strong>e × tester analysis to evaluate the general and specific comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g ability of various l<strong>in</strong>es and to estimate<br />
gene effects. This analysis requires a lengthy series of complicated computational steps, which, when done <strong>in</strong> SAS ® , would<br />
require <strong>in</strong>-depth knowledge of the software. However, few breeders have this capability; thus, a program was developed for<br />
users with limited knowledge of SAS. This program requests <strong>in</strong>formation from users <strong>in</strong>teractively and pr<strong>in</strong>ts out the needed<br />
analyses. Users of the program need to know only how to open the program file, respond to queries, and pr<strong>in</strong>t the output. The<br />
l<strong>in</strong>e × tester program is available from the Biometrics Unit at <strong>IRRI</strong>.<br />
L<strong>in</strong>e × tester analysis <strong>in</strong>volves a lengthy series of complicated<br />
computational steps, which, when done <strong>in</strong> SAS ® , would require<br />
<strong>in</strong>-depth knowledge of the software. Thus, to help breeders<br />
analyze their own data, we developed <strong>in</strong>teractive programs<br />
such as that for l<strong>in</strong>e × tester analysis us<strong>in</strong>g the SAS system.<br />
In formulat<strong>in</strong>g programs for the genetic improvement of<br />
yield, breeders face the difficult task of choos<strong>in</strong>g parents for<br />
hybridization. This is because yield is a quantitative character,<br />
with several components, each of which is polygenically controlled<br />
and therefore highly affected by environmental fluctuations.<br />
The task becomes even more complex when breeders<br />
have to choose from a wide collection of diverse germplasm.<br />
Breeders use l<strong>in</strong>e × tester analysis to evaluate the general and<br />
specific comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g ability of parents. At the same time, this<br />
analytical tool is useful <strong>in</strong> estimat<strong>in</strong>g various types of gene<br />
effects. The analysis provides an opportunity for discrim<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g<br />
large numbers of parents for their comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g ability without<br />
mak<strong>in</strong>g so many crosses. Prasad and Sastry (1987) and<br />
Manuel and Palanisamy (1989) used this technique to identify<br />
parents and crosses that could be exploited for future breed<strong>in</strong>g<br />
programs. The tables presented <strong>in</strong> these papers are uniform<br />
and can thus be standardized <strong>in</strong> a macro program.<br />
The SAS program for l<strong>in</strong>e × tester analysis<br />
The step-by-step procedure presented by S<strong>in</strong>gh and Chaudhary<br />
(1979) was used <strong>in</strong> develop<strong>in</strong>g the program for l<strong>in</strong>e × tester<br />
analysis, with some modifications <strong>in</strong> the partition<strong>in</strong>g of variety<br />
effect. The program was developed us<strong>in</strong>g the macro facility,<br />
a powerful tool <strong>in</strong> SAS programm<strong>in</strong>g. To illustrate the program,<br />
we used a sample data set with seven l<strong>in</strong>es, four testers,<br />
and four checks. Sample outputs are presented <strong>in</strong> the appendix.<br />
The program was developed under the W<strong>in</strong>dows ® environment.<br />
It is <strong>in</strong>teractive and does not require proficiency <strong>in</strong><br />
the use of SAS. One needs to know only how to open the program<br />
file, respond to queries, and pr<strong>in</strong>t the output. However,<br />
if you <strong>in</strong>tend to write a similar program, you will need an <strong>in</strong>depth<br />
knowledge of the macro facility.<br />
The program, through messages flashed <strong>in</strong> the log w<strong>in</strong>dow,<br />
asks you to <strong>in</strong>put <strong>in</strong>formation <strong>in</strong> the program editor and<br />
then submit responses by click<strong>in</strong>g on the runn<strong>in</strong>g-man icon.<br />
The <strong>in</strong>formation required is number of testers, l<strong>in</strong>es, checks,<br />
and replicates and the start and end column of their location <strong>in</strong><br />
the <strong>in</strong>put file. The program also asks for the name of the data<br />
set to be analyzed; entry number of l<strong>in</strong>es, testers, and checks;<br />
and the number and names of characters to be analyzed. In<br />
response to queries on entry numbers, the numbers can be en-<br />
Genomics 389
tered as a str<strong>in</strong>g separated by a period (e.g., 5.6.7.8.9.10.11).<br />
This <strong>in</strong>formation is needed to create subset data sets for l<strong>in</strong>es,<br />
testers, and checks that will be needed <strong>in</strong> the computation of<br />
various estimates.<br />
L<strong>in</strong>e × tester analysis outputs<br />
After the program has received the needed <strong>in</strong>formation, it outputs<br />
the tables needed <strong>in</strong> a l<strong>in</strong>e × tester analysis. The outputs<br />
of the program <strong>in</strong>clude the follow<strong>in</strong>g:<br />
l Analysis of variance with partitioned variety group<br />
effects. This helps <strong>in</strong> sort<strong>in</strong>g out the variance from<br />
different sources. Variations were partitioned between<br />
varieties and with<strong>in</strong> variety groups. This provides a<br />
basis for the test of significance. The general l<strong>in</strong>ear<br />
models (GLM) procedure of SAS/STAT was used to<br />
output the sums of squares needed, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g those<br />
for the partitioned effects. The program was developed<br />
to handle any number of testers, l<strong>in</strong>es, and<br />
checks. The contrast statement of the PROC GLM<br />
was not used to partition variety effect as the number<br />
of contrast coefficients will depend on the number of<br />
testers, l<strong>in</strong>es, and checks. All sums of squares were<br />
comb<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> one data set. F values and their correspond<strong>in</strong>g<br />
levels of significance were recomputed and<br />
then pr<strong>in</strong>ted <strong>in</strong> a table us<strong>in</strong>g the data step report-writ<strong>in</strong>g<br />
facility.<br />
l Table of parent means and their respective general<br />
comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g ability (GCA), and hybrid means and their<br />
respective specific comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g ability (SCA). GCA is<br />
the average performance of a l<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> a series of hybrids<br />
and represents additive gene action (fixable<br />
l<br />
l<br />
References<br />
genes). SCA measures the deviation of hybrids from<br />
the value expected on the basis of parental performance.<br />
It represents nonadditive gene action<br />
(nonfixable genes). Comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g ability studies help <strong>in</strong><br />
identify<strong>in</strong>g parents with a high GCA and <strong>in</strong> identify<strong>in</strong>g<br />
cross comb<strong>in</strong>ations show<strong>in</strong>g a high SCA. GCA is<br />
the difference of the parent mean from the grand mean,<br />
whereas the SCA is the hybrid mean m<strong>in</strong>us the l<strong>in</strong>e<br />
and tester effects.<br />
Table of standard errors for comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g ability effect.<br />
These standard errors can be used to test the significance<br />
of the different comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g ability effects.<br />
Heterosis analysis. This table presents the performance<br />
of the hybrids compared with that of their parents.<br />
It can be used to identify hybrid performance<br />
that exceeds the average parental performance.<br />
Manuel WW, Palanisamy S. 1989. L<strong>in</strong>e × tester analysis of comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />
ability of rice. Oryza 26:27-32.<br />
Prasad GSV, Sastry MVS. 1987. L<strong>in</strong>e × tester analysis for comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />
ability and heterosis <strong>in</strong> brown planthopper-resistant varieties.<br />
Indian Agric. 31:257-265.<br />
S<strong>in</strong>gh RK, Chaudhary BD. 1979. Biometrical methods <strong>in</strong> quantitative<br />
genetic analysis. New Delhi (India): Kalyani Publishers.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ address: V.I. Bartolome, Biometrics Unit, and G.B.<br />
Gregorio, Plant Breed<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>Genetics</strong>, and Biochemistry Division,<br />
<strong>International</strong> <strong>Rice</strong> Research Institute (<strong>IRRI</strong>), Los Baños,<br />
Philipp<strong>in</strong>es.<br />
Appendix. Program outputs<br />
A. Analysis of variance table for gra<strong>in</strong> yield (kg ha –1 ).<br />
Source of variation a df Sum of squares Mean square F Prob.<br />
Rep 2 1,455,214.7442 727,607.3721 5.10 0.0083<br />
Var 42 81,725,258.3566 1,945,839.4847 13.63 0.0000<br />
C vs (P,H) 1 3,971,791.7241 3,971,791.7241 27.82 0.0000<br />
P vs H 1 21,968,449.9528 21,968,449.9528 153.85 0.0000<br />
Checks (C) 3 2,807,278.0000 935,759.3333 6.55 0.0008<br />
Parent (P) 10 9,083,068.0606 908,306.8061 6.36 0.0000<br />
Hybrid (H) 27 43,894,670.6190 1,625,728.5414 11.39 0.0000<br />
L<strong>in</strong>e 6 20,995,238.2857 3,499,206.3810 3.07 0.0299<br />
Tester 3 2,359,246.2381 786,415.4127
B. Parental means and their respective general comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g ability<br />
(partial) for gra<strong>in</strong> yield (kg ha –1 ) (av of 3 reps).<br />
D. Standard errors of comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g ability effects for<br />
gra<strong>in</strong> yield (kg ha –1 ).<br />
Variety Parental mean GCA<br />
Parameter<br />
Estimate<br />
Tester 1 796.333 228.2143<br />
2 370.000 52.8810<br />
3 767.667 –235.3095<br />
4 1,168.667 –45.7857<br />
L<strong>in</strong>e 5 1,984.333 –635.3571<br />
6 1,019.667 369.2262<br />
7 1,799.000 760.8929<br />
C. Hybrid means and their respective specific<br />
comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g ability (partial) for gra<strong>in</strong> yield<br />
(kg ha –1 ) (av of 3 reps).<br />
Variety Hybrid mean SCA<br />
12 1,762.667 1.7857<br />
13 2,516.000 –249.4643<br />
14 3,275.000 117.8690<br />
15 2,649.667 –174.7143<br />
16 2,620.000 497.0357<br />
17 1,562.667 –224.4643<br />
18 2,387.667 31.9524<br />
19 1,656.000 70.4524<br />
S.E. (GCA for l<strong>in</strong>e) 109.0833<br />
S.E. (GCA for tester) 82.4592<br />
S.E. (SCA for effects) 218.1666<br />
S.E. (gi – gi) l<strong>in</strong>e 154.2671<br />
S.E. (gi – gi) tester 116.6149<br />
S.E. (sij – skl) 308.5341<br />
Cov. H.S. (l<strong>in</strong>e) 196,507.0776<br />
Cov. H.S. (tester) –16,890.7637<br />
Cov. H.S. (av) 10,769.0465<br />
Cov. F.S. 537,426.4023<br />
s2A with F = 0 172,304.7437<br />
s2A with F = 1 43,076.1859<br />
s2D with F= 0 5,324,434.5305<br />
s2D with F= 1 1,331,108.6329<br />
Contribution of l<strong>in</strong>es 47.83%<br />
Contribution of testers 5.37%<br />
Contribution of (1 × t) 46.79%<br />
E. Heterosis analysis (partial) for gra<strong>in</strong> yield (kg ha –1 ).<br />
Hybrid Parental Better Diff. Heterosis Diff. Heteroris<br />
L<strong>in</strong>e Tester mean Female Male mean parent from over MP from over BP<br />
(F 1 ) (MP) (BP) MP (%) BP (%)<br />
5 1 1,762.67 1,984.33 796.33 1,390.33 1,984.33 372.33 26.78 –221.67 –11.17<br />
2 1,656.00 1,984.33 370.00 1,177.17 1,984.33 478.83 40.68 –328.33 –16.55<br />
3 1,081.67 1,984.33 767.67 1,376.00 1,984.33 –249.33 –21.39 –902.67 –45.49<br />
4 1,630.33 1,984.33 1,168.67 1,576.50 1,984.33 53.83 3.41 –354.00 –17.84<br />
6 1 2,516.00 1,019.67 796.33 908.00 1,019.67 1,608.00 177.09 1,496.33 146.75<br />
2 2,802.67 1,019.67 370.00 694.83 1,019.67 2,107.83 303.36 1,783.00 174.86<br />
3 2,181.00 1,019.67 767.67 893.67 1,019.67 1,287.33 144.05 1,161.33 113.89<br />
4 2,649.33 1,019.67 1,168.67 1,094.17 1,168.67 1,555.17 142.13 1,480.67 126.70<br />
Genomics 391
Gene isolation and function<br />
Gene isolation and function 393
394 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
One super-mutator transposon family found <strong>in</strong> rice<br />
R. Ishikawa, K. Miura, M. Ashida, M. Senda, S. Akada, T. Harada, and M. Niizeki<br />
<strong>Rice</strong> Mutator (RMu) elements were cloned and characterized as Mutator homologs. The first clone was RMu1-IR36 carry<strong>in</strong>g<br />
long term<strong>in</strong>al <strong>in</strong>verted repeats (TIRs) flanked by a 9-bp target site duplication. As an <strong>in</strong>ternal sequence, a long open read<strong>in</strong>g<br />
frame shares high homology to a MURA prote<strong>in</strong> cod<strong>in</strong>g gene, mudrA, <strong>in</strong> a maize Mutator element. The RMu family has several<br />
members shar<strong>in</strong>g homologous long TIRs. The TIRs also share about 50% similarity with that of a maize Mutator regulatory<br />
element, MuDR. The most conserved doma<strong>in</strong>s were known as MURA prote<strong>in</strong>-b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g sequences and <strong>in</strong>ternal <strong>in</strong>verted repeatlike<br />
sequences. Japonica stra<strong>in</strong>s showed cont<strong>in</strong>uous expression of the gene, whereas <strong>in</strong>dica stra<strong>in</strong>s showed a highly regulated<br />
expression. Current transposition activity was presumed by the ability to produce new bands <strong>in</strong> the selfed progeny. Active<br />
transposable elements <strong>in</strong> the rice genome will provide useful <strong>in</strong>formation <strong>in</strong> functional genomics.<br />
RMu1-IR36 was cloned as a homolog to maize Mutator transposable<br />
elements (Ishikawa and Freel<strong>in</strong>g 1996). Its size is 4,368<br />
bp and it is flanked by a 9-bp genomic repeat. RMu transposable<br />
elements have several subfamilies carry<strong>in</strong>g term<strong>in</strong>al <strong>in</strong>verted<br />
repeats (TIRs) reveal<strong>in</strong>g sequence similarities to TIRs<br />
of RMu1-IR36 (Fig. 1). The TIRs carry highly conserved doma<strong>in</strong>s<br />
shar<strong>in</strong>g homology to TIRs of MuDR known as a regulatory<br />
element of the Mutator family (Fig. 2). The RMu1 class is<br />
an autonomous class <strong>in</strong> the RMu family. Each member <strong>in</strong> the<br />
class carries a s<strong>in</strong>gle rmuA gene hav<strong>in</strong>g the putative transposase<br />
doma<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>side (Eisen et al 1994). The open read<strong>in</strong>g frame shares<br />
a high similarity to the mudrA gene, which is a transposase<br />
gene <strong>in</strong> MuDR (Chomet et al 1991, Eisen et al 1994). The<br />
highest part revealed 80% similarity between two doma<strong>in</strong>s<br />
found <strong>in</strong> rice RMu and maize Mutator elements (Fig. 3). Expression<br />
of the gene was confirmed <strong>in</strong> japonica stra<strong>in</strong>s and a<br />
particular <strong>in</strong>dica stra<strong>in</strong> when exposed to chill<strong>in</strong>g stress at regular<br />
<strong>in</strong>tervals. The function has not yet been confirmed <strong>in</strong> rice.<br />
However, we detected new bands <strong>in</strong> the self-poll<strong>in</strong>ated progeny<br />
<strong>in</strong> the A1 (Akage) stra<strong>in</strong> (Fig. 4). We have not obta<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
progeny from these stra<strong>in</strong>s because they did not set seeds. Thus,<br />
we could not confirm whether this k<strong>in</strong>d of new band can be<br />
transmitted through pollen or egg. However, this condition to<br />
activate the transcription of the rmuA gene would produce more<br />
<strong>in</strong>dividuals carry<strong>in</strong>g this k<strong>in</strong>d of new band.<br />
The RMu family as one of the super-Mu families<br />
The rice genome has several transposons shar<strong>in</strong>g structural<br />
similarities to the maize Mu family. Among them, RMu1-IR36<br />
exceptionally showed the highest similarity to MuDR. We th<strong>in</strong>k<br />
that there are multi-Mu l<strong>in</strong>eages <strong>in</strong> s<strong>in</strong>gle genomes and that<br />
any plant species might carry an Mu l<strong>in</strong>eage. RMu1-IR36 is<br />
one of the l<strong>in</strong>eages and it seems to be the most promis<strong>in</strong>g element<br />
for transposition. In addition, s<strong>in</strong>ce maize Mutator is<br />
known as a powerful tool for understand<strong>in</strong>g gene function, rice<br />
Mutator homologs will give us valuable tools for know<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
function of numerous genomic sequences isolated by the rice<br />
genome project.<br />
References<br />
Benito M, Walbot V. 1997. Characterization of the maize Mutator<br />
transposable element MURA transposase as DNA-b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g<br />
prote<strong>in</strong>. Mol. Cell Biol. 17:5165-5175.<br />
RMu1-IR36<br />
rmuA<br />
RMu2-IR36<br />
RMu2-A1a<br />
RMu2-A1b<br />
RMu2-A1c<br />
Fig. 1. Members of the RMu family. RMu1-IR36 has an open read<strong>in</strong>g frame (open boxes)<br />
and long TIRs (arrows). Other members carry homologous TIRs but some members carry<br />
unrelated <strong>in</strong>ternal sequences as shown <strong>in</strong> differently hatched boxes.<br />
Gene isolation and function 395
RMu1, L<br />
RMu1, L<br />
Consensus<br />
MuDR, L<br />
MuDR, R<br />
IR-like<br />
MBS (25–56 nt)<br />
RMu1, L<br />
RMu1, L<br />
Consensus<br />
MuDR, L<br />
MuDR, R<br />
RMu1, L<br />
RMu1, L<br />
Consensus<br />
MuDR, L<br />
MuDR, R<br />
IR-like<br />
RMu1, L<br />
RMu1, L<br />
Consensus<br />
MuDR, L<br />
MuDR, R<br />
RMu1, L<br />
RMu1, L<br />
Consensus<br />
MuDR, L<br />
MuDR, R<br />
Fig. 2. Sequence comparison among TIRs of RMu1-IR36 and MuDR. Consensus sequences are common<br />
nucleotides found <strong>in</strong> at least three sequences. Inverted repeat (IR)-like sequences are predicted <strong>in</strong>verted<br />
repeats <strong>in</strong>side of these TIRs. MBS = MURA b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g site (Benito and Walbot 1997).<br />
MuDR<br />
10 20 30 40<br />
<strong>Rice</strong><br />
MuDR<br />
50 60 70 80<br />
<strong>Rice</strong><br />
MuDR<br />
90 100 110 120<br />
<strong>Rice</strong><br />
MuDR<br />
130 140 142<br />
<strong>Rice</strong><br />
Fig. 3. Conserved am<strong>in</strong>o acid sequences between putative transposase doma<strong>in</strong>s found <strong>in</strong><br />
MuDR and RMu1-IR36. Asterisks show substitutional am<strong>in</strong>o acids.<br />
396 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
4.0 kb<br />
Chomet P, Lisch D, Hardeman KJ, Chandler VL, Freel<strong>in</strong>g M. 1991.<br />
Identification of a regulatory transposon that controls the<br />
Mutator transposable element system <strong>in</strong> maize. <strong>Genetics</strong><br />
129:261-270.<br />
Eisen JA, Benito MI, Walbot V. 1994. Sequence similarity of putative<br />
transposase l<strong>in</strong>ks the maize Mutator autonomous element<br />
and a group of bacterial <strong>in</strong>sertion sequences. Nucleic Acids<br />
Res. 19:2634-2636.<br />
Ishikawa R, Freel<strong>in</strong>g M. 1996. Putative transposase-like doma<strong>in</strong><br />
found <strong>in</strong> rice genome. <strong>Rice</strong> Genet. Newsl. 13:146-147.<br />
Fig. 4. Rmu-related restriction fragment length polymorphisms<br />
found <strong>in</strong> the selfed progeny. Eight plants of stra<strong>in</strong> A1 were grown<br />
and mature leaves were used to extract genomic DNA. DNA was<br />
digested with XhoI and probed with TIR.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ addresses: R. Ishikawa, K. Miura, M. Ashida, T. Harada,<br />
and M. Niizeki, Faculty of Agriculture and Life Sciences; M.<br />
Senda and S. Akada, Gene Research Center, Hirosaki University,<br />
Hirosaki 036-8561, Japan.<br />
A maize MuDR-like tranposable element transcribed<br />
<strong>in</strong> the rice genome<br />
S. Yoshida, N. Asakura, R. Ootani, and C. Nakamura<br />
We previously showed that prol<strong>in</strong>e added to the subculture medium dramatically <strong>in</strong>creased the frequency of alb<strong>in</strong>o plants <strong>in</strong><br />
rice tissue culture under high osmotic conditions. Us<strong>in</strong>g the differential display method, a prol<strong>in</strong>e-<strong>in</strong>duced transcript was<br />
identified that showed considerable homology to the maize mudrA transcript of the MuDR transposon. We obta<strong>in</strong>ed 12 genomic<br />
clones, of which two clones, OsMu4-2 (4.7 kb) hav<strong>in</strong>g term<strong>in</strong>al <strong>in</strong>verted repeats (TIRs) and OsMu10-1 (1.1 kb) with<br />
highly homologous TIRs, were analyzed. Both had 9-bp putative target-site duplications outside of the TIRs. RT-PCR products<br />
from the cod<strong>in</strong>g region of OsMu4-2 were obta<strong>in</strong>ed us<strong>in</strong>g primers designed by the genomic sequence. The structural analysis<br />
suggested that OsMuDR is a rice orthologue of the maize MuDR. An am<strong>in</strong>o acid sequence of the MURA-like prote<strong>in</strong> deduced<br />
from OsMu4-2, however, <strong>in</strong>cluded several stop codons <strong>in</strong> the read<strong>in</strong>g frame. Results suggested that OsMu4-2 was a pseudogene.<br />
OsMu10-1 possessed only a 330-bp sequence of the 3′-end of the cod<strong>in</strong>g region. This deleted version possessed 5-nucleotide<br />
direct repeats at the deletion po<strong>in</strong>t, suggest<strong>in</strong>g that the deletion was caused by the <strong>in</strong>terrupted gap repair mechanism. The<br />
presence of such a deletion provided an <strong>in</strong>dication that the rice MuDR element had transposed <strong>in</strong> the past.<br />
Eukaryotic genomes possess numerous transposons and<br />
retrotransposons. These transposable elements are considered<br />
to be genomic modelers, play<strong>in</strong>g a significant role <strong>in</strong> the evolution<br />
of genome structure and function. Because of their transposable<br />
nature, endogenous transposons and retrotransposons<br />
have potential as genetic tools for <strong>in</strong>vestigat<strong>in</strong>g gene function.<br />
In rice, the presence of retrotransposons (a Tos family) has<br />
been demonstrated, which are activated by <strong>in</strong> vitro culture,<br />
thus provid<strong>in</strong>g a powerful means for gene tagg<strong>in</strong>g (Hirochika<br />
et al 1996). However, activation of even a most active member<br />
(Tos17) is restricted <strong>in</strong> certa<strong>in</strong> japonica rice varieties. It is<br />
therefore predicted that unknown transposable elements are<br />
present and contribute to the somaclonal variation <strong>in</strong> rice.<br />
Dur<strong>in</strong>g a study of the effects of osmotic stress and exogenous<br />
prol<strong>in</strong>e on plant regeneration from anther- and seedderived<br />
callus cultures <strong>in</strong> rice, it was found that prol<strong>in</strong>e added<br />
<strong>in</strong> subculture medium strongly stimulated regeneration of alb<strong>in</strong>o<br />
plants. Through differential display screen<strong>in</strong>g, a maize<br />
mudrA-like rice transcript was identified that showed accumulation<br />
<strong>in</strong> callus subcultured under the condition stimulat<strong>in</strong>g<br />
alb<strong>in</strong>o regeneration (Yoshida et al 1998). We report results on<br />
the structural study of genomic clones and RT-PCR products<br />
of the maize MuDR-like transposable element <strong>in</strong> rice.<br />
Isolation and structural analysis of genomic clones<br />
of the rice OsMuDR<br />
A rice genomic library was screened us<strong>in</strong>g a previously obta<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
partial cDNA clone, OsmudrA (Yoshida et al 1998), as<br />
a probe. Sequences of two out of 12 clones were analyzed.<br />
One clone, OsMu4-2, was 4.7 kb <strong>in</strong> length and had term<strong>in</strong>al<br />
<strong>in</strong>verted repeats (TIRs), whereas the other clone, OsMu10-1,<br />
was 1.1 kb with highly homologous TIRs (Fig. 1). They had 9-<br />
bp putative target-site duplications outside of the TIRs. A cod-<br />
Gene isolation and function 397
Sequence flank<strong>in</strong>g the OsMu10-1 deletion end po<strong>in</strong>t<br />
TTGGCAACAAttgtctcag<br />
agtcaaacaaGGACAACT<br />
mudrA-like transcript<br />
5¢ 3¢<br />
Sal H B H K E Sac X<br />
ACCCACCTC<br />
TGGGTGGAG<br />
TIR<br />
OsMu4-2<br />
1 kb<br />
ACACACCTC<br />
TGTGTGGAG<br />
TIR<br />
TCTCTCGTC<br />
TCCCTCGTC<br />
AGAGAGCAG<br />
AGGGAGCAG<br />
TIR<br />
TIR<br />
OsMu10-1<br />
Fig. 1. A schematic representation of two<br />
rice genomic clones (OsMu4-2 and<br />
OsMu10-1). Hatched areas are homologous<br />
regions between the two clones and<br />
black triangles represent term<strong>in</strong>al <strong>in</strong>verted<br />
repeats (TIRs). Restriction sites are abbreviated;<br />
B = BamHI, E = EcoRI, H = H<strong>in</strong>dIII,<br />
K = KpnI, Sac = SacI, Sal = SalI, X = XbaI.<br />
In a mudrA-like transcript, the gray bar <strong>in</strong>dicates<br />
the region amplified by RT-PCR. In<br />
the sequence flank<strong>in</strong>g the OsMu10-1 deletion<br />
end po<strong>in</strong>ts, boxed sequences of<br />
AACAA and a hatched region <strong>in</strong>dicate direct<br />
repeats and a deletion, respectively.<br />
<strong>in</strong>g region of OsMu4-2 showed high homology with the maize<br />
mudrA transcript. RT-PCR products were obta<strong>in</strong>ed us<strong>in</strong>g primers<br />
designed by the genomic sequence of OsMu4-2 and RNAs<br />
extracted from seed-derived callus subcultured with 10 mM<br />
prol<strong>in</strong>e. A sequence revealed by overlapped products was compared<br />
with those of the partial cDNA clone (OsmudrA) and<br />
the genomic clone (OsMu4-2). The result suggested that the<br />
genomic sequence had at least two splice sites for <strong>in</strong>trons of<br />
355-bp and 82-bp length. The other clone, OsMu10-1, showed<br />
a large deletion and possessed only a 330-bp sequence of the<br />
3′-end of the cod<strong>in</strong>g region. Two direct repeats of 5 bp<br />
(AACAA) were found <strong>in</strong> the OsMu4-2 sequence, whereas, <strong>in</strong><br />
OsMu10-1, one repeat was miss<strong>in</strong>g (Fig. 1). This loss of the<br />
repeat occurred at the region flank<strong>in</strong>g the deletion end po<strong>in</strong>t.<br />
This suggested that the deletion with<strong>in</strong> OsMu10-1 was caused<br />
by the <strong>in</strong>terrupted gap repair mechanism <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g the direct<br />
repeats <strong>in</strong> the element, as already suggested <strong>in</strong> the Mu-element<br />
of maize and P element of Drosophila (Hsia and Schnable<br />
1995).<br />
Homology of the rice OsMuDR with the maize MuDR<br />
The am<strong>in</strong>o acid sequence of the MURA (transposase)-like prote<strong>in</strong><br />
(OsMURA) deduced from the nucleotide sequence of<br />
OsMu4-2 <strong>in</strong>cluded several stop codons <strong>in</strong> midpo<strong>in</strong>ts of the<br />
read<strong>in</strong>g frame, suggest<strong>in</strong>g that it was a pseudogene. The longest<br />
deduced am<strong>in</strong>o acid sequence of OsMURA, however,<br />
showed considerable homology (43.4% am<strong>in</strong>o acid identity)<br />
with the maize MURA. With<strong>in</strong> the sequence motif that is conserved<br />
<strong>in</strong> MURA and putative transposases of a group of bacterial<br />
<strong>in</strong>sertion sequences (Eisen et al 1994), OsMURA showed<br />
more than 50% am<strong>in</strong>o acid identity with the maize MURA.<br />
TIR sequences of OsMu showed an average of about<br />
50% nucleotide identity with that of Mu1 of the maize Mu<br />
family. A UPGMA analysis of the most-term<strong>in</strong>al region (93–<br />
99 bp), <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g the transposase-b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g site (Benito and<br />
Walbot 1997), showed that the rice OsMu formed a dist<strong>in</strong>ct<br />
cluster compared with that which conta<strong>in</strong>ed all members of<br />
the maize Mu family (Fig. 2).<br />
Discussion<br />
Mu transposable elements have been identified <strong>in</strong> maize. The<br />
first <strong>in</strong>sertion event was observed <strong>in</strong> l<strong>in</strong>es with high copy numbers<br />
(10 to 100 copies) of the Mu element, whereas less than<br />
two copies were detected <strong>in</strong> the other l<strong>in</strong>es (reviewed <strong>in</strong><br />
Bennetzen et al 1993). An autonomous regulator of the Mu<br />
family has been cloned <strong>in</strong> several laboratories, designated as<br />
MuDR. Multicopy MuDR was reported to cause 20- to 50-fold<br />
higher frequency of forward mutation than the maize Ac and<br />
Spm transposable elements. Furthermore, Cresse et al (1995)<br />
reported that the Mu transposable element preferentially <strong>in</strong>serts<br />
<strong>in</strong>to low-copy-number DNA <strong>in</strong> gene-enriched regions of<br />
the maize genome. Therefore, Mu elements are considered to<br />
be an efficient tool for transposon tagg<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
We showed that the rice genome possessed sequences<br />
with considerable homology with the maize regulatory transposable<br />
element MuDR. Many expressed sequences of rice<br />
that show homology with the maize mudrA transcript have been<br />
deposited <strong>in</strong> the database. However, their homology was much<br />
less than that observed <strong>in</strong> the OsMu. Structural analysis of<br />
genomic sequences and RT-PCR products suggested that the<br />
rice element OsMuDR is an orthologue of the maize MuDR.<br />
The rice OsMuDR is transcriptionally active, although the sequences<br />
analyzed apparently represented a pseudogene. Importantly,<br />
the presence of the deleted version (OsMu10-1) suggests<br />
that this structure might have been caused by the <strong>in</strong>terrupted<br />
gap repair mechanism after transposition of the element<br />
(Hsia and Schnable 1995). This provides an <strong>in</strong>dication<br />
that the rice element transposed at least <strong>in</strong> the past.<br />
Activation/<strong>in</strong>activation of MuDR is regulated by<br />
demethylation/methylation. Joan<strong>in</strong> et al (1997) observed tissue-<br />
and developmental stage-specific accumulation of Mu<br />
transcripts. The study suggested the <strong>in</strong>volvement of tissue-specific<br />
promoters or enhancers that drive transcription of nearby<br />
MuDR elements. These observations and the activation of<br />
OsMuDR by prol<strong>in</strong>e might suggest the presence of a prol<strong>in</strong>emediated<br />
regulatory mechanism of the rice element. Although<br />
the functionally active Mu-like transposable element system<br />
<strong>in</strong> rice has yet to be demonstrated, our results suggested that<br />
398 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
Mu1.4-L<br />
Mu1.7-R<br />
Mu1-L<br />
Mu5-R<br />
Mu1.7-L<br />
Mu7-L<br />
Mu7-R<br />
Mu8-L<br />
Mu8-R<br />
Mu1-R<br />
Mu1.4-R<br />
Mu4-L<br />
Mu4-R<br />
Mu3-L<br />
Mu3-R<br />
Mu5-L<br />
Mu9-L<br />
Mu9-R<br />
OsMu10-1-L<br />
OsMu4-2-L<br />
OsMu10-1-R<br />
0.20 0.15 0.10 0.05 0<br />
Genetic distance<br />
OsMu4-2-R<br />
Fig. 2. A cluster analysis based on the<br />
nucleotide sequences of TIRs <strong>in</strong> the<br />
maize Mu transposons and the OsMu. A<br />
dendrogram was constructed by UPGMA<br />
method of DNA sequences <strong>in</strong> the mostterm<strong>in</strong>al<br />
93–99-bp region of TIRs.<br />
OsMuDR might play an important role <strong>in</strong> somaclonal and<br />
gametoclonal variations, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g prol<strong>in</strong>e-stimulated alb<strong>in</strong>ism.<br />
A further study of structural diversity and the regulatory mechanism<br />
of this novel rice element is required to test this <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g<br />
hypothesis.<br />
References<br />
Bennetzen J, Spr<strong>in</strong>ger PS, Cresse AD, Hendrickx M. 1993. Specificity<br />
and regulation of the mutator transposable element system<br />
<strong>in</strong> maize. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 12:57-95.<br />
Benito M-I, Walbot V. 1997. Characterization of the maize mutator<br />
transposable element MURA transposase as a DNA-b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g<br />
prote<strong>in</strong>. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17:5165-5175.<br />
Cresse AD, Hulbert SH, Brown WE, Lucas LR, Bennetzen J. 1995.<br />
Mu1-related transposable elements of maize preferentially<br />
<strong>in</strong>sert <strong>in</strong>to low copy number DNA. <strong>Genetics</strong> 140:315-324.<br />
Eisen JA, Benito M-I, Walbot V. 1994. Sequence similarity of putative<br />
transposases l<strong>in</strong>ks the maize Mutator autonomous element<br />
and a group of bacterial <strong>in</strong>sertion sequences. Nucleic<br />
Acids Res. 22:2634-2636.<br />
Hirochika H, Sugimoto K, Otsuki Y, Tsugawa H, Kanda M. 1996.<br />
Retrotransposons of rice <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> mutations <strong>in</strong>duced by<br />
tissue culture. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93:7783-7788.<br />
Hsia A-P, Schnable S. 1995. DNA sequence analyses support the<br />
role of <strong>in</strong>terrupted gap repair <strong>in</strong> the orig<strong>in</strong> of <strong>in</strong>ternal deletions<br />
of the maize transposon MuDR. <strong>Genetics</strong> 142:603-618.<br />
Joan<strong>in</strong> P, Hershberger RJ, Benito M-I, Walbot V. 1997. Sense and<br />
antisense transcripts of the maize MuDR regulatory transposon<br />
localized by <strong>in</strong> situ hybridization. Plant Mol. Biol. 33:23-36.<br />
Yoshida S, Tamaki K, Watanabe K, Fuj<strong>in</strong>o M, Nakamura C. 1998. A<br />
maize MuDR-like element expressed <strong>in</strong> rice callus subcultured<br />
with prol<strong>in</strong>e. Hereditas 129:95-99.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ addresses: S. Yoshida and R. Ootani, Hyogo Prefectural<br />
Institute of Agricultural Research, Kasai, Hyogo, 679-0198;<br />
N. Asakura, Faculty of Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g, Kanagawa University,<br />
Kanagawa-ku, Yokohama 221-8686; C. Nakamura, Faculty<br />
of Agriculture, Kobe University, Nada-ku, Kobe 657-8501,<br />
Japan.<br />
Gene isolation and function 399
Transcriptional analysis of the Mu-like element Tnr2 <strong>in</strong> rice<br />
F. Myouga, S. Tsuchimoto, H. Ohtsubo, and E. Ohtsubo<br />
Tnr2 is a nonautonomous transposable element of rice with term<strong>in</strong>al <strong>in</strong>verted repeats (TIRs), and it produces a duplication of<br />
a 9-bp sequence at the target site. Among the Tnr2 members, we found an exceptionally large member with homology to the<br />
sequence of mudrA that is the transposase gene encoded by the maize transposable element MuDR. We identified transcripts<br />
from mudrA of Tnr2 by Northern hybridization <strong>in</strong> both Nipponbare plants and Oc-cultured cells of rice, <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g that the Tnr2<br />
member is able to transpose autonomously <strong>in</strong> the rice genome. RT-PCR and 5′- and 3′-RACE analyses of the transcripts<br />
revealed that the positions of several <strong>in</strong>trons present <strong>in</strong> mudrA of Tnr2 differed from those <strong>in</strong> MuDR, and that multiple<br />
polyadenylation sites existed. Dur<strong>in</strong>g these studies, a transcript with about 60% homology to that of Tnr2 was found. These<br />
results <strong>in</strong>dicated that Tnr2, as well as the Tnr2 homolog, was transcribed and thus can transpose autonomously <strong>in</strong> the rice<br />
genome.<br />
Transposable DNA elements are classified <strong>in</strong>to three major<br />
families, Ac/Ds, En/Spm, and Mu. Elements of the Mu family<br />
share 210-bp term<strong>in</strong>al <strong>in</strong>verted repeats (TIRs) and are flanked<br />
by direct repeats of a 9-bp sequence of the target site. These<br />
elements have the highest transposition activity and exhibit a<br />
low specificity of the target sequence (Bennetzen 1996). MuDR<br />
(4,942 bp long) is an autonomous element with two cod<strong>in</strong>g<br />
regions, mudrA and mudrB, that encode prote<strong>in</strong>s MURA and<br />
MURB of 823 and 207 am<strong>in</strong>o acid residues, respectively<br />
(Hershberger et al 1995). MURA is a transposase and specifically<br />
b<strong>in</strong>ds to the sequences with<strong>in</strong> TIRs.<br />
Tnr2 is a 147-bp <strong>in</strong>sertion sequence found with<strong>in</strong> a member<br />
of the rice retroposon p-SINE1 (Mochizuki et al 1992). It<br />
appears to be a transposable element because it has TIR sequences<br />
about 56 bp long, and a target site duplication (TSD)<br />
of a 9-bp sequence is seen <strong>in</strong> the regions flank<strong>in</strong>g Tnr2. Tnr2<br />
is thought to be a nonautonomous element because of its small<br />
size. Several hundred copies of Tnr2 members have been identified<br />
<strong>in</strong> the Oryza sativa genome. Among these Tnr2 members,<br />
we found an exceptionally large one with homology to<br />
the sequence of mudrA of MuDR. In this study, we report that<br />
the mudrA-like region of Tnr2 was transcribed, which suggested<br />
that the large Tnr2 member is a Mu-like autonomous<br />
element of rice.<br />
Materials and methods<br />
Total genomic DNA was extracted from shoots of Oryza sativa<br />
cv. Nipponbare and Oc-cultured cells treated with or without<br />
0.3 mM 5-azacytid<strong>in</strong>e, as described previously (Ohtsubo<br />
et al 1997). Total RNA was extracted by acidic phenol and<br />
RNaid Matrix (BIO 101).<br />
Reverse transcription-polymerase cha<strong>in</strong> reaction (RT-<br />
PCR) was performed us<strong>in</strong>g primers, which hybridize to exons<br />
3 and 4, and us<strong>in</strong>g total RNA (about 1 µg) as the template, as<br />
described previously (Kumekawa et al 1999). The RACE-PCR<br />
was done by a standard RACE protocol start<strong>in</strong>g with 2 µg of<br />
total RNA (Frohman et al 1988). The PCR-amplified cDNA<br />
fragments were cloned <strong>in</strong>to a vector plasmid (pGEM-T easy;<br />
Promega). Nucleotide sequenc<strong>in</strong>g was carried out us<strong>in</strong>g an ABI<br />
PRISM Dye Term<strong>in</strong>ator Cycle Sequenc<strong>in</strong>g FS Core kit (PE<br />
Applied Biosystems) and analyzed <strong>in</strong> an ABI 377 DNA sequencer.<br />
Results and discussion<br />
Expression of Tnr2 <strong>in</strong> the rice plant<br />
and cultured cells<br />
Tnr2 is a 147-bp nonautonomous transposable element present<br />
<strong>in</strong> the O. sativa genome. Among the Tnr2 members, we found<br />
an exceptionally large member with homology to mudrA, the<br />
transposase gene encoded by the maize transposable element<br />
MuDR. We exam<strong>in</strong>ed the expression of the mudrA-like region<br />
<strong>in</strong> Tnr2 <strong>in</strong> shoots of rice cv. Nipponbare and Oc-cultured cells<br />
by RT-PCR and by 5′- and 3′-RACE, and found that Tnr2 was<br />
expressed (Figs. 1 and 2). The expression of Tnr2 was also<br />
exam<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> Oc cells treated with 5-azacytid<strong>in</strong>e (azaC), which<br />
eventually resulted <strong>in</strong> hypomethylation of genomic DNA<br />
methyltransferase (Santi et al 1983, Jones 1984, 1985). The<br />
amount of Tnr2 transcripts, however, was not <strong>in</strong>creased by the<br />
azaC treatment (data not shown). This suggested that the expression<br />
of Tnr2 transposase is not epigenetically regulated<br />
by DNA methylation, unlike the case of the Mu element (Brown<br />
et al 1994).<br />
Structural analysis of transcripts from Tnr2<br />
Clon<strong>in</strong>g and sequenc<strong>in</strong>g cDNAs obta<strong>in</strong>ed by RT-PCR and 5′-<br />
RACE revealed that the number of <strong>in</strong>trons <strong>in</strong> Tnr2 mudrA and<br />
their positions differed from those <strong>in</strong> MuDR (Fig. 1). Exons 2<br />
and 3 of Tnr2 mudrA were highly homologous to MuDR<br />
mudrA, but not other exons. Interest<strong>in</strong>gly, a few transcripts<br />
existed that appeared to be produced by alternative splic<strong>in</strong>g<br />
(Fig. 3).<br />
Clon<strong>in</strong>g and sequenc<strong>in</strong>g cDNAs obta<strong>in</strong>ed by 3′-RACE<br />
revealed the existence of multiple polyadenylation sites for<br />
transcriptional term<strong>in</strong>ation with<strong>in</strong> a 200-bp region. This region<br />
<strong>in</strong>cluded polyadenylation signals and direct repeats of a<br />
sequence with a length rang<strong>in</strong>g from 12 to 42 bp (Fig. 4A).<br />
400 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
MuDR<br />
mudrA<br />
5′->3′ : Initiation codon : Term<strong>in</strong>ation codon<br />
Frame 3<br />
Frame 2<br />
Frame 1<br />
1001 2001 3001 4001<br />
Exon 1 Exon 2 Exon 3 Exon 4<br />
Tnr2<br />
Exon 1 Exon 2 Exon 3 Exon 4 Exon 5<br />
5′->3′ : Initiation codon : Term<strong>in</strong>ation codon<br />
Frame 3<br />
1001 2001 3001 4001 5001<br />
Frame 2<br />
Frame 1<br />
Fig. 1. Structures of MuDR and<br />
Tnr2. The shaded boxes <strong>in</strong> open<br />
read<strong>in</strong>g frames represent the cod<strong>in</strong>g<br />
regions of mudrA. Exons of<br />
mudrA are <strong>in</strong>dicated by open and<br />
closed boxes.<br />
kb<br />
23.1<br />
9.4<br />
6.5<br />
4.3<br />
M<br />
Genomic<br />
DNA<br />
Nipponbare<br />
plant RNA<br />
Oc cells<br />
RNA<br />
+ – + –<br />
RT<br />
2.3<br />
2.0<br />
0.56<br />
Fig. 2. An agarose gel (1.2%) show<strong>in</strong>g<br />
the amplified fragments by RT-<br />
PCR. M = H<strong>in</strong>dIII digests of phage<br />
lambda; RT = treated with (+) or without<br />
(–) reverse transcriptase.<br />
Gene isolation and function 401
I<br />
II<br />
III<br />
1 1001 2001 3001 4001 5001<br />
1 2 3 4<br />
A1<br />
A2<br />
Tnr2<br />
IV<br />
A3<br />
mRNA Intron Splice junction sequences Features<br />
I 1 TG GTAAGTTC GTCAG GAT –<br />
2 GG GTATTATA TGCAG GTC –<br />
3 AG GTTAGTTC TGCAG GAA –<br />
4 AG GTAAGGCA GACAG GAG –<br />
II A1 – No splic<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>in</strong>tron 1<br />
III A2 TG GTAAGTTC TGCAG ATC Alternative splic<strong>in</strong>g<br />
IV A3 TG GTAAGTGG TGCAG TTC Alternative splic<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Fig. 3. Schematic representations of<br />
transcripts and sequences at splic<strong>in</strong>g<br />
junctions. Transcripts <strong>in</strong>clude those produced<br />
by alternative splic<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
A<br />
Tnr2 mudrA<br />
1 1001 2001 3001 4001 5001<br />
Poly(A) signal<br />
B<br />
2800 3200 3600 2800 3200 3600<br />
400<br />
800<br />
400<br />
1st (horizontal): Tnr2<br />
2nd (vertical): 3′-RACE product (Tnr2)<br />
1st: Tnr2<br />
2nd: 3′-RACE product (Tnr2 homolog)<br />
Fig. 4. (A) The 3′-untranslated region<br />
of Tnr2. An expanded view of<br />
the 3′-untranslated region shows<br />
several k<strong>in</strong>ds of direct repeats<br />
around transcription term<strong>in</strong>ation<br />
sites. Positions of<br />
polyadenylation (polyA) signals<br />
are shown. (B) Dot matrices between<br />
Tnr2 nucleotide sequence<br />
and each of the two 3′-RACE products<br />
from Tnr2 (left) and a Tnr2<br />
homolog (right). Dots are placed<br />
at locations with identical nucleotides<br />
when more than 14 of 20<br />
nucleotides are identical.<br />
402 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
Presence of a transcript with homology to Tnr2<br />
Clon<strong>in</strong>g and sequenc<strong>in</strong>g cDNAs obta<strong>in</strong>ed by 3′-RACE also<br />
revealed a transcript show<strong>in</strong>g about 60% homology to Tnr2<br />
(Fig. 4B). This suggested the existence of a Tnr2 homolog, an<br />
autonomous element that is transcribed as is Tnr2. A computer-assisted<br />
homology search of databases revealed many<br />
other sequences with high homology to mudrA of Tnr2 <strong>in</strong> the<br />
rice genome. Some of these Tnr2 homologs may also be autonomous<br />
elements <strong>in</strong> the rice genome.<br />
References<br />
Bennetzen JL. 1996. The Mutator transposable element system of<br />
maize. In: Saedler H, Gierl A, editors. Transposable elements.<br />
New York: Spr<strong>in</strong>ger-Verlag. p 195-229.<br />
Brown WE, Spr<strong>in</strong>ger PS, Bennetzen JL. 1994. Progressive modification<br />
of Mu transposable elements dur<strong>in</strong>g development.<br />
Maydica 39:119-126.<br />
Frohman MA, Dush MK, Mart<strong>in</strong> GR. 1988. Rapid production of<br />
full-length cDNAs from rare transcripts: amplification us<strong>in</strong>g<br />
a s<strong>in</strong>gle gene-specific oligonucleotide primer. Proc. Natl. Acad.<br />
Sci. USA 85:8998-9002.<br />
Hershberger RJ, Benito MI, Hardeman KJ, Warren C, Chandler VL,<br />
Walbot V. 1995. Characterization of the major transcripts encoded<br />
by the regulatory MuDR transposable element of maize.<br />
<strong>Genetics</strong> 140:1087-1098.<br />
Kumekawa N, Ohtsubo H, Horiuchi T, Ohtsubo E. 1999. Identification<br />
and characterization of novel retrotransposons of the<br />
gypsy type <strong>in</strong> rice. Mol. Gen. Genet. 260:593-602.<br />
Ohtsubo H, Umeda M, Ohtsubo E. 1997. Organization of DNA sequences<br />
highly repeated <strong>in</strong> tandem <strong>in</strong> rice genomes. Jpn. J.<br />
Genet. 66:241-254.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ address: Institute of Molecular and Cellular Biosciences,<br />
University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0032, Japan.<br />
Phone: 81-3-5841-7852, fax: 81-3-5841-8484, e-mail:<br />
eohtsubo@ims.u-tokyo.ac.jp.<br />
Acknowledgments: We thank our colleague Dr. Y. Sek<strong>in</strong>e for critically<br />
read<strong>in</strong>g the manuscript. This work was supported by a<br />
Grant-<strong>in</strong>-Aid for Scientific Research from the M<strong>in</strong>istry of<br />
Education, Science, Sports, and Culture of Japan, and by a<br />
grant from the M<strong>in</strong>istry of Agriculture, Forestry, and Fisheries<br />
of Japan.<br />
Chloroplast target<strong>in</strong>g signal regulates transgene<br />
expression <strong>in</strong> rice<br />
I.C. Jang, K.H. Lee, B.H. Nahm, and J.K. Kim<br />
Previously, we reported that the presence of the rbcS transit peptide (Tp) sequence as a plastid-target<strong>in</strong>g signal led to a greatly<br />
enhanced accumulation of transgene products <strong>in</strong> transgenic rice plants. To study the mechanisms underly<strong>in</strong>g the regulation of<br />
transgene expression by the Tp sequence, we mutated the sequence (mTp) <strong>in</strong> such a way that it can no longer localize fused<br />
heterologous prote<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong>to plastids but it can reta<strong>in</strong> the nucleotide sequence identical to that of its wild type. The mTp was<br />
fused to the synthetic gene (sgfp) encod<strong>in</strong>g a modified form of the green fluorescent prote<strong>in</strong> (sGFP) and l<strong>in</strong>ked to the rice rbcS<br />
promoter, result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> an expression vector, rbcS-mTp-sgfp. To compare the expression levels <strong>in</strong> transgenic plants, two expression<br />
vectors, rbcS-sgfp for an untargeted expression and rbcS-Tp-sgfp for a chloroplast-targeted expression, were constructed.<br />
Several transgenic plants were produced for each construct by the Agrobacterium-mediated method. N<strong>in</strong>eteen transgenic l<strong>in</strong>es<br />
that are resistant to the Basta herbicide were analyzed by genomic Southern and Northern blot analyses, <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g that<br />
transgene copy numbers ranged from one to four and the mRNA levels are very different, depend<strong>in</strong>g on the type of Tp sequence<br />
employed. Transcript levels of rbcS-Tp-sgfp-transformed l<strong>in</strong>es were significantly higher than those of either rbcS-mTp-sgfp- or<br />
rbcS-sgfp-transformed l<strong>in</strong>es, whereas levels of the last two were comparable. These results suggest that the rbcS transit<br />
peptide sequence <strong>in</strong>creases the accumulation of transgene products by sequester<strong>in</strong>g gene products <strong>in</strong> chloroplasts, which also<br />
<strong>in</strong>creases mRNA levels significantly.<br />
The majority of chloroplast prote<strong>in</strong>s are nuclear-encoded and<br />
synthesized as precursors on cytosolic ribosomes. Prote<strong>in</strong>s<br />
dest<strong>in</strong>ed to the chloroplasts generally have an am<strong>in</strong>o-term<strong>in</strong>al<br />
extension known as a transit peptide (Tp) that makes them<br />
localized <strong>in</strong>to the organelles. A large number of Tp sequences<br />
have been reported, and their am<strong>in</strong>o acid sequences show little<br />
homology at the levels of primary and secondary structure.<br />
Ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (Rubisco) is the<br />
most abundant prote<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> the leaves of light-grown plants. The<br />
rice rbcS gene was previously cloned and characterized<br />
(Kyozuka et al 1993). It was predicted that removal of an N-<br />
term<strong>in</strong>al Tp by putative cleavage between the Cys (residue<br />
47) and Met (residue 48) of the rbcS precusor would yield a<br />
mature rbcS prote<strong>in</strong>. Recently, we reported that the Tp is correctly<br />
cleaved between the Cys and Met from the Tp-sgfp fusion<br />
prote<strong>in</strong> dur<strong>in</strong>g transport to chloroplasts of transgenic rice<br />
plants (Jang et al 1999).<br />
Some reports <strong>in</strong>dicate that sequester<strong>in</strong>g of the heterologous<br />
prote<strong>in</strong>s to chloroplasts by Tp sequences enhanced expression<br />
levels (Jang et al 1999). Several studies of Tps dem-<br />
Gene isolation and function 403
onstrated that process<strong>in</strong>g of mutants <strong>in</strong> either the am<strong>in</strong>o term<strong>in</strong>al<br />
or central portion of the Tp appeared normal, but a deletion<br />
mutation at the carboxyl-term<strong>in</strong>al <strong>in</strong>terfered with both<br />
transport and process<strong>in</strong>g (K<strong>in</strong>dle and Lawrence 1998, Reiss et<br />
al 1987). We mutated the sequence, alter<strong>in</strong>g nearly all the am<strong>in</strong>o<br />
acids of the Tp. The wild-type and the mutant Tp sequence,<br />
together with the rice rbcS promoter, were l<strong>in</strong>ked to the sgfp<br />
gene and transformed <strong>in</strong>to rice. Several transgenic l<strong>in</strong>es for<br />
each construct were produced and the expression levels of sgfp<br />
were analyzed and compared at transcript and prote<strong>in</strong> levels.<br />
Materials and methods<br />
Construction of the plasmid pSB-RTG and its features are described<br />
elsewhere (Jang et al 1999). The modified Tp sequence<br />
(mTp) was PCR-amplified, <strong>in</strong>duc<strong>in</strong>g a frame-shift mutation<br />
us<strong>in</strong>g upstream primer 5′-AGCTGCAGAGATGGGCCCCCT<br />
CCGT-3′ that <strong>in</strong>serts the underl<strong>in</strong>ed G, downstream primer 5′-<br />
CACCATGGCCTGC-TGCACCTGATCCTG-3′ that deletes<br />
A, and the plasmid pSK-RTG (Jang et al 1999) as a template.<br />
PCR-amplified DNA was digested with PstI and NcoI, ligated<br />
with PstI/NcoI-l<strong>in</strong>earized pSK-RG conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the rbcS promoter<br />
l<strong>in</strong>ked to the sgfp gene, produc<strong>in</strong>g the plasmid pSK-<br />
RmTG. The 2.2-kb DNA fragment conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the rbcS-Tpsgfp<br />
was obta<strong>in</strong>ed by digestion with BamHI and NotI, and ligated<br />
<strong>in</strong>to BamHI/NotI-l<strong>in</strong>earized pSB105, which conta<strong>in</strong>s the<br />
potato protease <strong>in</strong>hibitor II term<strong>in</strong>ator/35S promoter/bar/<br />
nopal<strong>in</strong>e synthase term<strong>in</strong>ator <strong>in</strong> between the right- and leftborder<br />
sequence of pSB11.<br />
Transformation was carried out accord<strong>in</strong>g to the procedure<br />
of Hiei et al (1994), except for add<strong>in</strong>g 7 mg L –1 and 4 mg<br />
L –1 of phosph<strong>in</strong>otric<strong>in</strong> to the selection and the regeneration<br />
medium, respectively. Genomic DNA was isolated from greenhouse-grown<br />
leaves of transgenic rice plants. Southern hybridization<br />
was carried out follow<strong>in</strong>g standard procedures.<br />
Total RNA was isolated from leaf tissues of transgenic<br />
rice plants by the guanidium/LiCl method. Ten µg of total RNA<br />
was denatured <strong>in</strong> the presence of 50% formamide, 2.2 M formaldehyde,<br />
20 mM 3-(N-morphol<strong>in</strong>o) propanesulfonic acid<br />
(MOPS), and 0.5 mM EDTA for 5 m<strong>in</strong> at 70 °C. The RNA<br />
was electrophoresed on 1% formaldehyde-agarose gel and blotted<br />
onto a Hybond N + nylon membrane. Hybridization, probe<br />
DNA, and wash<strong>in</strong>g conditions were identical to those for Southern<br />
hybridization. The band <strong>in</strong>tensity that is exposed onto the<br />
<strong>in</strong>tensify<strong>in</strong>g plate was quantified us<strong>in</strong>g the phospho-image<br />
analyzer.<br />
Results<br />
Construction of plant expression vectors<br />
To study the mechanisms underly<strong>in</strong>g the regulation of transgene<br />
expression by the Tp sequence, we mutated the sequence (mTp)<br />
<strong>in</strong> such a way that it no longer localizes fused heterologous<br />
prote<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong>to plastids but reta<strong>in</strong>s the nucleotide sequence that<br />
is nearly identical to that of its wild type. This was done by<br />
<strong>in</strong>sert<strong>in</strong>g a nucleotide G right after the ATG translational <strong>in</strong>itiation<br />
codon sequence and by delet<strong>in</strong>g a nucleotide T that<br />
was a part of the Met codon sequence at position 48 (Jang et al<br />
1999). This resulted <strong>in</strong> a frame shift between the <strong>in</strong>itiation<br />
codon and the Tp cleavage site. The am<strong>in</strong>o acid sequence of<br />
mTp is not very different from that of its wild type <strong>in</strong> terms of<br />
hydrophobicity. The mTp was fused to the synthetic gene (sgfp)<br />
encod<strong>in</strong>g a modified form of the green fluorescent prote<strong>in</strong><br />
(sGFP) and l<strong>in</strong>ked to the rice rbcS promoter, result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> an<br />
expression vector, pSB-RmTG (rbcS-mTp-sgfp). The regions<br />
spann<strong>in</strong>g the junction between mTp and sgfp were sequenced.<br />
To compare the expression levels <strong>in</strong> transgenic plants, two other<br />
expression vectors, pSB-RG (rbcS-sgfp) for an untargeted<br />
expression and pSB-RTG (rbcS-Tp-sgfp) for a chloroplast-targeted<br />
expression, were constructed. The three plasmids conta<strong>in</strong><br />
the bar gene as a selectable marker for transformation<br />
under the control of the CaMV 35S promoter.<br />
Production and genomic DNA analysis<br />
of transgenic rice plants<br />
Fifty-eight <strong>in</strong>dependent l<strong>in</strong>es (35 for rbcS-sgfp, 11 for rbcS-<br />
Tp-sgfp, and 12 for rbcS-mTp-sgfp) of transgenic rice plants<br />
were obta<strong>in</strong>ed. All transformants were first tested for herbicide<br />
resistance by treat<strong>in</strong>g with 0.5% commercial herbicide<br />
Basta. To exam<strong>in</strong>e the copy number and <strong>in</strong>tegration event of<br />
the transgenes <strong>in</strong> their genomes, 12 herbicide-resistant plants<br />
were randomly chosen and their genomic DNA extracted. The<br />
genomic DNA from rbcS-sgfp-transformed plants was digested<br />
either with XbaI, which excised the <strong>in</strong>tact size of sgfp, or with<br />
SpeI, which cut only one site of the plasmid. The 0.7-kb fragment<br />
correspond<strong>in</strong>g to “XbaI digest” appeared <strong>in</strong> all the<br />
transformants, <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g that they conta<strong>in</strong>ed the functional sgfp<br />
gene. The rbcS-sgfp-transformed l<strong>in</strong>es (Fig. 1A) showed dist<strong>in</strong>ct<br />
band patterns, suggest<strong>in</strong>g that each l<strong>in</strong>e was produced by<br />
an <strong>in</strong>dependent <strong>in</strong>tegration event. Similarly, the genomic DNA<br />
from rbcS-Tp-sgfp- or rbcS-mTp-sgfp-transformed plants was<br />
digested either with PstI, which excised the full-length sgfp-<br />
Tp plus P<strong>in</strong>II term<strong>in</strong>ator, or with KpnI hav<strong>in</strong>g a unique site on<br />
its T-DNA. The 1.8-kb fragment correspond<strong>in</strong>g to “PstI digest”<br />
appeared <strong>in</strong> all the transformants and each l<strong>in</strong>e was produced<br />
by an <strong>in</strong>dependent <strong>in</strong>tegration event (Fig. 1B, 1C).<br />
Comparison of expression levels <strong>in</strong> transgenic plants<br />
To exam<strong>in</strong>e the expression levels of the transgene, Northern<br />
blot analysis was performed us<strong>in</strong>g total RNA from leaf tissues<br />
and the sgfp gene as a probe. As shown <strong>in</strong> Figure 2A, the sgfp<br />
transcripts were expressed <strong>in</strong> all the rbcS-, rbcS-Tp-, and rbcSmTp-transformed<br />
l<strong>in</strong>es. The sgfp expression levels <strong>in</strong> mature<br />
leaves of rbcS-Tp-transformed l<strong>in</strong>es were much higher than<br />
those of rbcS-mTp-transformed l<strong>in</strong>es, whereas the levels of<br />
rbcS-mTp-sgfp- and rbcS-sgfp-transformed l<strong>in</strong>es were comparable<br />
(Fig. 2B). Levels of sGFP prote<strong>in</strong> accumulation were<br />
also compared among the transgenic l<strong>in</strong>es by western blot<br />
analysis (data not shown), <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g a pattern of variation similar<br />
to that of the transcript levels. The wild-type Tp sequence<br />
<strong>in</strong>creased expression levels eight- to tenfold when compared<br />
with the rbcS promoter itself or mTp (Fig. 2B). These results<br />
404 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
A<br />
rbcS<br />
rbcS-Tp<br />
rbcS-mTp<br />
B C<br />
PC NC 1 2 3 4 5 6<br />
PC NC 1 2<br />
PC NC 1 2 3 4<br />
kb M 5X 3X 1X X X Sp X Sp X Sp X Sp X Sp XSp M 5X3X1X P P K P K M 5X 3X 1X P P K P K P K P K<br />
23.1<br />
9.4<br />
6.5<br />
4.3<br />
2.3<br />
2.0<br />
0.5<br />
Fig. 1. (A) Genomic DNA from the leaf tissues of rbcS-sgfp-transformed plants (1–6) was digested with<br />
XbaI (X) and SpeI (Sp) and hybridized with an α- 32 P-labeled 0.7-kb DNA fragment conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the sgfp<br />
cod<strong>in</strong>g region. PC conta<strong>in</strong>s XbaI-digested rbcS-sgfp. (B) Genomic DNA from the leaf tissues of rbcS-Tpsgfp-transformed<br />
plants (1–2) was digested with PstI (P) and KpnI (K) and hybridized. PC conta<strong>in</strong>s PstIdigested<br />
rbcS-Tp-sgfp. (C) Genomic DNA from the leaf tissues of rbcS-mTp-sgfp-transformed plants<br />
(1–4) was digested with PstI (P) and KpnI (K) and hybridized. PC conta<strong>in</strong>s PstI-digested pSB-Rm-RmTG.<br />
NC = genomic DNA from an untransformed control plant; 1X, 3X, and 5X <strong>in</strong> PC represent 1, 3, and 5<br />
genome equivalents of rbcS-sgfp (A), rbcS-Tp-sgfp (B), or rbcS-mTp-sgfp (C) relative to 5 µg of rice<br />
genomic DNA, respectively. The DNA molecular size markers (M) are <strong>in</strong>dicated on the left-hand side.<br />
A<br />
rbcS rbcS-Tp rbcS-mTp<br />
NC 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 1 2 3 4<br />
sgfp<br />
Control<br />
B<br />
Relative band <strong>in</strong>tensity<br />
1,400<br />
1,200<br />
1,000<br />
800<br />
600<br />
400<br />
200<br />
0<br />
C<br />
rbcS1<br />
rbcS2<br />
rbcS3<br />
rbcS4<br />
rbcS5<br />
rbcS6<br />
rbcS-Tp1<br />
rbcS-Tp2<br />
rbcSmTp1<br />
rbcSmTp2<br />
rbcSmTp3<br />
rbcSmTp4<br />
Fig. 2. RNA gel-blot analysis and relative levels of sgfp transcripts <strong>in</strong> rbcS-sgfp-, rbcS-Tp-sgfp-, and rbcSmTp-sgfp-transformed<br />
rice plants, respectively. Ethidium bromide (EtBr)-sta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g of total RNA was used as<br />
a control for equal RNA load<strong>in</strong>g. (A) Total RNA from leaf tissues of rbcS-sgfp (rbcS1-6), rbcS-Tp-sgfp (rbcS-<br />
Tp1-2), and rbcS-mTp-sgfp (rbcS-mTp1-4) and from an untransformed control plant (C) was hybridized with<br />
an α- 32 P-labeled 0.7-kb DNA fragment conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the sgfp cod<strong>in</strong>g region. (B) Relative transcript levels of<br />
sgfp. The probed membrane <strong>in</strong> A was exposed onto the <strong>in</strong>tensify<strong>in</strong>g plate and detected by a phospho-image<br />
analyzer (FLA 3000, Fuji) and relative band <strong>in</strong>tensity was calculated us<strong>in</strong>g rbcS6 as a reference.<br />
Gene isolation and function 405
suggest that sequester<strong>in</strong>g of gene products <strong>in</strong> chloroplasts by<br />
the Tp sequence <strong>in</strong>creases transcript and prote<strong>in</strong> accumulation<br />
levels significantly.<br />
Discussion<br />
We observed previously the fusion of the rbcS promoter and<br />
its Tp sequence to sgfp-produced plants, which expressed sgfp<br />
of about 10% of the total soluble prote<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> mature leaf tissues<br />
(Jang et al 1999). In this study, we mutated the rbcS Tp sequence<br />
(mTp) such that it no longer transports sGFP <strong>in</strong>to chloroplasts.<br />
Transit peptide sequences are generally rich <strong>in</strong> basic<br />
and hydroxylated am<strong>in</strong>o acids and lack polar am<strong>in</strong>o acids. Our<br />
mTp is more basic than the wild-type Tp, but it has similar<br />
hydrophobicity. The cleavage site region between the Cys47<br />
and Met48 of the rbcS precursor (Kyozuka et al 1993) was<br />
substituted for the Val47 and Gln48 <strong>in</strong> the mTp. Three expression<br />
vectors, rbcS-sgfp and rbcS-mTp-sgfp for an untargeted<br />
expression and rbcS-Tp-sgfp for a chloroplast-targeted expression,<br />
were constructed and <strong>in</strong>troduced <strong>in</strong>to rice and the mTp<br />
compared with its wild type for <strong>in</strong>fluence on a fused transgene<br />
expression at transcript levels. The wild-type Tp sequence<br />
(rbcS-Tp-sgfp) <strong>in</strong>creased expression levels much more than<br />
did the rbcS promoter itself (rbcS-sgfp) or mTp (rbcS-mTpsgfp).<br />
These results prompt us to conclude that sequester<strong>in</strong>g<br />
of gene products <strong>in</strong> chloroplasts by the Tp sequence <strong>in</strong>creases<br />
transcript levels. We barely detected sGFP prote<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> leaves of<br />
rbcS-mTp-sgfp-transformed l<strong>in</strong>es us<strong>in</strong>g immunoblot analysis<br />
(data not shown). We believe that mTp-sGFP prote<strong>in</strong> became<br />
unstable because of the presence of mTp and was degraded<br />
rapidly by cytosolic protease. The context of the translation<br />
<strong>in</strong>itiation codon can also affect the rate of translation of mRNA<br />
<strong>in</strong> plants (Helliwell and Gray 1995). The authors found that<br />
the G at +4 is important for determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g rates of translation<br />
<strong>in</strong>itiation. Although the mTp conta<strong>in</strong>s one additional G <strong>in</strong> the<br />
sequence-flank<strong>in</strong>g translation <strong>in</strong>itiation, the G at the +4 position<br />
rema<strong>in</strong>s the same as <strong>in</strong> its wild type.<br />
References<br />
Helliwell CA, Gray JC. 1995. The sequence surround<strong>in</strong>g the translation<br />
<strong>in</strong>itiation codon of the pea plastocyan<strong>in</strong> gene <strong>in</strong>creases<br />
translational efficiency of a reporter gene. Plant Mol. Biol.<br />
29:621-626.<br />
Hiei Y, Ohta S, Komari T, Kumashiro T. 1994. Efficient transformation<br />
of rice (Oryza sativa L.) mediated by Agrobacterium and<br />
sequence analysis of the boundaries of the T-DNA. Plant J.<br />
6:271-282.<br />
Jang I-C, Nahm BH, Kim J-K. 1999. Subcellular target<strong>in</strong>g of green<br />
fluorescent prote<strong>in</strong> to plastids <strong>in</strong> transgenic rice plants provides<br />
a high-level expression system. Mol. Breed. 5:453-461.<br />
K<strong>in</strong>dle KL, Lawrence SD. 1998. Transit peptide mutations that impair<br />
<strong>in</strong> vitro and <strong>in</strong> vivo chloroplast prote<strong>in</strong> import do not<br />
affect accumulation of the α-subunit of chloroplast ATPase.<br />
Plant Physiol. 116:1179-1190.<br />
Kyozuka J, McElroy D, Hayakawa T, Xie Y, Wu R, Shimamoto K.<br />
1993. Light-regulated and cell-specific expression of tomato<br />
rbcS-gusA and rice rbcS-gusA fusion gene <strong>in</strong> transgenic rice.<br />
Plant Physiol. 102:991-1000.<br />
Reiss B, Wasmann CC, Bohnert HJ. 1987. Regions <strong>in</strong> the transit<br />
peptide of SSU essential for transport <strong>in</strong>to chloroplasts. Mol.<br />
Gen. Genet. 209:116-121.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ address: Department of Biological Science, Myongji University,<br />
Yong<strong>in</strong> 449-728, Korea.<br />
Isolation and functional characterization<br />
of the DREB family of genes <strong>in</strong> rice<br />
J.G. Dubouzet, Y. Sakuma, E.G. Dubouzet, S. Miura, K. Yamaguchi-Sh<strong>in</strong>ozaki, and K. Sh<strong>in</strong>ozaki<br />
The DREB gene family of transcription factors <strong>in</strong> Arabidopsis thaliana has been shown to play a key role <strong>in</strong> orchestrat<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
plant’s response to stress factors such as cold, drought, and sal<strong>in</strong>ity. Clon<strong>in</strong>g of similar genes <strong>in</strong> rice may be a prerequisite for<br />
develop<strong>in</strong>g superior transgenic cultivars that can withstand or thrive <strong>in</strong> adverse environments. Here we report the characteristics<br />
of the correspond<strong>in</strong>g DREB homologues <strong>in</strong> rice, Os (Oryza sativa) DREB1A, 1B, 1G1, and OsDREB2. OsDREB1A, like<br />
DREB1A, is up-regulated <strong>in</strong> plants exposed to cold. Unlike DREB1A, OsDREB1A is sensitive to salt and wound stress. Similar<br />
to DREB2A, OsDREB2 is <strong>in</strong>duced by drought and sal<strong>in</strong>ity but not by cold exposure. Both OsDREBs specifically b<strong>in</strong>d the DRE/CRT<br />
motif <strong>in</strong> the rd29 promoter. Based on GUS/LUC data produced <strong>in</strong> a rice protoplast assay, OsDREB1A is better than OsDREB2<br />
<strong>in</strong> transactivat<strong>in</strong>g genes conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the DRE motif <strong>in</strong> their promoter regions. The OsDREB genes <strong>in</strong> this report may play an<br />
important role <strong>in</strong> the production of superior transgenic rice plants that are resistant to multiple-stress environments.<br />
406 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
<strong>Rice</strong> production is limited by abiotic stress factors such as cold,<br />
drought, and sal<strong>in</strong>ity. Areas now under rice cultivation are often<br />
beset by weather fluctuations such as cold or dry spells.<br />
Hence, rice varieties that can withstand the vagaries of weather<br />
can help stabilize production. <strong>Rice</strong> varieties that can be cultivated<br />
<strong>in</strong> adverse environments will reduce the pressure to deforest<br />
new areas for cultivation.<br />
In Arabidopsis, Liu et al (1998) demonstrated the feasibility<br />
of improv<strong>in</strong>g the plant’s ability to withstand extreme<br />
abiotic stress by constitutive expression of a gene for a stressresponsive<br />
transcription factor known as DREB1A. DREB1A,<br />
B, and C and DREB2A and B belong to a large gene family of<br />
DNA-b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g prote<strong>in</strong>s that conta<strong>in</strong> a conserved region known<br />
as the ethylene responsive factor/Apetala 2 (ERF/AP2) prote<strong>in</strong><br />
doma<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> Arabidopsis. These DREBs produce prote<strong>in</strong>s<br />
that specifically b<strong>in</strong>d to and activate genes conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g a cisact<strong>in</strong>g<br />
element known as the dehydration responsive element/<br />
C-repeat (DRE/CRT) motif with the core sequence PuCCGAC<br />
(Liu et al 1998). This motif is <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> the rapid response<br />
of Arabidopsis to drought, low-temperature, or high-salt stress<br />
(Yamaguchi-Sh<strong>in</strong>ozaki and Sh<strong>in</strong>ozaki 1994). Comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />
DREB1A with a DRE-conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g, stress-responsive promoter<br />
<strong>in</strong> transgenic Arabidopsis plants resulted <strong>in</strong> improved tolerance<br />
for drought, sal<strong>in</strong>ity, and freez<strong>in</strong>g (Kasuga et al 1999).<br />
We report the isolation and characterization of stress<strong>in</strong>ducible,<br />
full-length cDNAs from rice that are homologous<br />
to the DREBs.<br />
Materials and methods<br />
cDNA libraries were constructed from 17-d-old rice seedl<strong>in</strong>gs<br />
that had been exposed to salt, cold, or drought stress. Homologues<br />
to the DREBs were identified by us<strong>in</strong>g the BLAST program<br />
to scan the rice sequence database. Probes were obta<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
from the conserved N term<strong>in</strong>al and ERF/AP2 regions of these<br />
homologues. Prob<strong>in</strong>g the cDNA libraries led to the isolation<br />
of two DREB-type genes, OsDREB1A and OsDREB2. A third<br />
cDNA clone, OsDREB1B, was recently obta<strong>in</strong>ed from the <strong>Rice</strong><br />
Genome Project (RGP, Japan).<br />
Specific probes for each gene were produced from their<br />
C term<strong>in</strong>als. RNA was prepared us<strong>in</strong>g the protocols described<br />
by Yamaguchi-Sh<strong>in</strong>ozaki et al (1989). RNA gel blots were prepared<br />
from rice seedl<strong>in</strong>gs that were exposed to cold (4 o C),<br />
drought (air dry<strong>in</strong>g), or sal<strong>in</strong>ity (250 mM NaCl) stress for 20<br />
m<strong>in</strong> or 24 h. GST-fusion prote<strong>in</strong>s were produced us<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
protocol of Urao et al (1993) to evaluate b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g specificity of<br />
the OsDREB prote<strong>in</strong>s to the DRE element <strong>in</strong> the promoter region<br />
of the rd29A gene from Arabidopsis. Trans activity <strong>in</strong><br />
rice protoplasts was assayed by cotransform<strong>in</strong>g a GUS reporter<br />
gene fused to two copies of the m<strong>in</strong>imal promoter region of<br />
rd29A (conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the DRE motif) and effector plasmid constructs<br />
of DREB1A, DREB2A, OsDREB1A, or OsDREB2. A<br />
luciferase gene fused to a ubiquit<strong>in</strong> promoter was<br />
cotransformed to serve as an <strong>in</strong>ternal control and to normalize<br />
GUS values. This transcription assay basically followed the<br />
procedures described by Hobo et al (1999).<br />
Results and discussion<br />
OsDREB1G1 encompasses a region <strong>in</strong> rice chromosome 6<br />
whose putative prote<strong>in</strong> translation is homologous to DREB1A<br />
of A. thaliana. A truncated fragment of OsDREB1G1 was<br />
amplified by polymerase cha<strong>in</strong> reaction (PCR) and used to<br />
screen cDNA libraries constructed from cold- and salt-stressed<br />
3-wk-old rice plants as a probe, but only OsDREB1A was isolated.<br />
A truncated expressed sequence tag (EST) (d38911) was<br />
identified by BLAST as homologous to DREB2 and the fulllength<br />
sequence (labeled as OsDREB2) was obta<strong>in</strong>ed by<br />
screen<strong>in</strong>g a drought-stressed cDNA library and by PCR amplification<br />
of the miss<strong>in</strong>g N term<strong>in</strong>us. The GC-rich OsDREB1B<br />
was obta<strong>in</strong>ed by the RGP from a cDNA library constructed<br />
from immature rice panicles.<br />
OsDREB1A, OsDREB1B, and OsDREB1G1 showed<br />
extensive similarity to DREB1A, especially <strong>in</strong> a portion of<br />
their N term<strong>in</strong>al regions and <strong>in</strong> their ERF/AP2 doma<strong>in</strong>s (Fig.<br />
1). The putative am<strong>in</strong>o acid sequences of DREB2A and<br />
OsDREB2 also showed extensive similarity <strong>in</strong> their N term<strong>in</strong>al<br />
regions and ERF/AP2 doma<strong>in</strong>s. These extended conserved<br />
regions imply that these genes have a fundamental role <strong>in</strong> plant<br />
stress metabolism. The conserved N term<strong>in</strong>al sections of<br />
DREB1A, OsDREB1A, and DREB2A may correspond to<br />
nuclear-localiz<strong>in</strong>g signals <strong>in</strong> these genes.<br />
The DREB1 family has three homologues <strong>in</strong> one contiguous<br />
locus, whereas DREB2A and DREB2B are found <strong>in</strong><br />
separate chromosomes <strong>in</strong> Arabidopsis (Nakashima et al 2000).<br />
Southern blot data suggest that OsDREB1A, 1B, and 1G1 and<br />
OsDREB2 are probably unl<strong>in</strong>ked s<strong>in</strong>gle-copy genes (data not<br />
shown). Northern hybridization of OsDREB1A revealed that<br />
it is up-regulated by cold and salt stress (Fig. 2A). OsDREB1A<br />
is also transiently activated by wound<strong>in</strong>g (data not shown). Its<br />
sensitivity to cold exposure, salt stress, or wound<strong>in</strong>g makes it<br />
more similar to DREB1C than to DREB1A. Like DREB1A,<br />
OsDREB1B is up-regulated by cold. OsDREB1G1 failed to<br />
hybridize with the RNA blots, <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g that it is not present<br />
<strong>in</strong> 17-d-old rice seedl<strong>in</strong>gs. It may be epigenetically controlled<br />
or it could be a pseudogene. Like DREB2A, OsDREB2 is upregulated<br />
by drought or sal<strong>in</strong>ity stress.<br />
In Arabidopsis, DREB prote<strong>in</strong>s b<strong>in</strong>d to DRE/CRT motifs<br />
<strong>in</strong> the promoter regions of stress-responsive genes, thus<br />
enhanc<strong>in</strong>g transcription. The gel-shift assay revealed that<br />
OsDREB1A and OsDREB2 specifically b<strong>in</strong>d to the DRE motif<br />
found <strong>in</strong> the promoter region of the stress-responsive rd29A<br />
gene of Arabidopsis (data not shown). Constitutive expression<br />
of such stress-responsive genes by transgenic Arabidopsis<br />
overexpress<strong>in</strong>g DREB1A has been shown to improve stress<br />
tolerance. Prelim<strong>in</strong>ary results from transient activation of an<br />
rd29A promoter-GUS fusion reporter construct <strong>in</strong>dicate that<br />
OsDREB1A and, to a lesser extent, OsDREB2 up-regulate the<br />
transcription of the GUS reporter gene, presumably by b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g<br />
to the DRE motif <strong>in</strong> the rd29A promoter. BLAST search<br />
has revealed many putative genes with plausible DRE/CRT<br />
motifs <strong>in</strong> their promoter regions.<br />
Gene isolation and function 407
A<br />
Prote<strong>in</strong> doma<strong>in</strong><br />
N term<strong>in</strong>al ERF/AP2 C term<strong>in</strong>al<br />
38.8% 55.9% 19.9% similarity<br />
OsDREB1G1<br />
36.7% 68.3% 31.0% similarity<br />
Positively charged<br />
OsDREB1B<br />
38.8%<br />
Negatively charged<br />
Positively charged<br />
80<br />
34.1% similarity<br />
OsDREB1A<br />
240<br />
DREB1A<br />
160<br />
B<br />
N term<strong>in</strong>al ERF/AP2 C term<strong>in</strong>al<br />
51.8% 82.5% 24.5% similarity<br />
Nuclear localiz<strong>in</strong>g<br />
signal<br />
OsDREB2<br />
DREB2<br />
100 200 300<br />
Fig.1. (A) Structural comparison<br />
of DREB1-type<br />
prote<strong>in</strong>s. (B) Structural<br />
comparison of DREB2-<br />
type prote<strong>in</strong>s.<br />
A<br />
Water<br />
20 m<strong>in</strong> Water<br />
24 h<br />
ABA<br />
20 m<strong>in</strong> 24 ABA<br />
h<br />
Dry<br />
20 m<strong>in</strong> 24 Dry<br />
h<br />
Cold<br />
20 m<strong>in</strong> 24 Cold<br />
h<br />
NaCl<br />
20 m<strong>in</strong> 24 NaCl<br />
h<br />
We are now implement<strong>in</strong>g research to identify OsDREB<br />
target genes <strong>in</strong> rice. In addition, experiments for the constitutive<br />
production of OsDREBs <strong>in</strong> transgenic rice have begun.<br />
B<br />
Fig. 2. Northern hybridization of OsDREB1A (A) and OsDREB (B).<br />
References<br />
Hobo T, Kowyama Y, Hattori T. 1999. A bZIP factor, TRAB1, <strong>in</strong>teracts<br />
with VP1 and mediates abscisic acid-<strong>in</strong>duced transcription.<br />
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96:15348-15353.<br />
Kasuga M, Liu Q, Miura S, Yamaguchi-Sh<strong>in</strong>ozaki K, Sh<strong>in</strong>ozaki K.<br />
1999. Improv<strong>in</strong>g plant drought, salt and freez<strong>in</strong>g tolerance by<br />
gene transfer of a s<strong>in</strong>gle stress-<strong>in</strong>ducible transcription factor.<br />
Nat. Biotechnol. 17:287-291.<br />
Liu Q, Kasuga M, Sakuma Y, Abe H, Miura S, Yamaguchi-Sh<strong>in</strong>ozaki<br />
K, Sh<strong>in</strong>ozaki K. 1998. Two transcription factors DREB1 and<br />
DREB2 with an EREBP/AP2 DNA b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g doma<strong>in</strong> separate<br />
408 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
two cellular signal transduction pathways <strong>in</strong> drought- and lowtemperature-responsive<br />
gene expression respectively <strong>in</strong><br />
Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 10:1391-1406.<br />
Nakashima K, Sh<strong>in</strong>wari ZK, Sakuma Y, Seki M, Miura S, Sh<strong>in</strong>ozaki<br />
K, Yamaguchi-Sh<strong>in</strong>ozaki K. 2000. Organization and expression<br />
of two Arabidopsis DREB2 genes encod<strong>in</strong>g DRE-b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g<br />
prote<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> dehydration- and high-sal<strong>in</strong>ity-responsive<br />
gene expression. Plant Mol. Biol. 42:657-665.<br />
Urao T, Yamaguchi-Sh<strong>in</strong>ozaki K, Urao S, Sh<strong>in</strong>ozaki K. 1993. An<br />
Arabidopsis myb homologue is <strong>in</strong>duced by dehydration stress<br />
and its gene product b<strong>in</strong>ds to the conserved MYB recognition<br />
sequence. Plant Cell 5:1529-1539.<br />
Yamaguchi-Sh<strong>in</strong>ozaki K, Mundy J, Chua NH. 1989. Four tightly<br />
l<strong>in</strong>ked rab genes are differentially expressed <strong>in</strong> rice. Plant Mol.<br />
Biol. 14:29-39.<br />
Yamaguchi-Sh<strong>in</strong>ozaki K, Sh<strong>in</strong>ozaki K. 1994. A novel cis-act<strong>in</strong>g element<br />
<strong>in</strong> an Arabidopsis gene is <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> responsiveness<br />
to drought, low-temperature, or high-salt stress. Plant Cell<br />
6:251-264.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ addresses: J.G. Dubouzet, Y. Sakuma, E.G. Dubouzet, S.<br />
Miura, K. Yamaguchi-Sh<strong>in</strong>ozaki, Japan <strong>International</strong> Research<br />
Center for Agricultural Science (JIRCAS), Tsukuba 305-8686;<br />
K. Sh<strong>in</strong>ozaki, Institute of Physical and Chemical Research,<br />
Tsukuba 305-0074, Japan.<br />
Characterization and expression of rice<br />
monosaccharide transporter genes, OsMST1–3<br />
K. Toyofuku, T. Takeda, J. Yamaguchi, and M. Kasahara<br />
This is the first report describ<strong>in</strong>g the clon<strong>in</strong>g of full-length cDNA clones and the characterization of the monosaccharide<br />
transporter gene from rice. OsMST1–3 (Oryza sativa monosaccharide transporters 1–3) have 12 putative transmembrane<br />
doma<strong>in</strong>s separated by a central long hydrophilic region. Heterologous expression of OsMST3 <strong>in</strong> the yeast Saccharomyces<br />
cerevisiae <strong>in</strong>dicated that OsMST3 has transport activity for some monosaccharides <strong>in</strong> an energy-dependent H + co-transport<br />
manner. Northern blot and <strong>in</strong> situ hybridization analyses showed that OsMST3 mRNA is detectable <strong>in</strong> leaf blades, leaf sheaths,<br />
calli, and roots, especially <strong>in</strong> the xylem, as well as <strong>in</strong> sclerenchyma cells <strong>in</strong> the roots. These results suggested that OsMST3 is<br />
<strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> accumulat<strong>in</strong>g monosaccharides required for cell-wall synthesis at the stage of cell-thicken<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
We report on the clon<strong>in</strong>g of the first cDNA clones of a monosaccharide<br />
transporter gene from rice and the characterization of<br />
the correspond<strong>in</strong>g gene products by heterologous expression<br />
<strong>in</strong> Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Furthermore, we have exam<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
their cell-specific expression <strong>in</strong> the root by <strong>in</strong> situ hybridization.<br />
The putative am<strong>in</strong>o acid sequences of OsMST1–3 were<br />
31.5% to 57.7% identical. OsMST1, OsMST2, and OsMST3<br />
were 517, 522, and 518 am<strong>in</strong>o acids long, respectively, with a<br />
calculated molecular weight of 56.9, 57.4, and 57.0 kDa, respectively.<br />
The hydrophobicity profile revealed that OsMST1–<br />
3 have two sets of putative six-transmembrane doma<strong>in</strong>s separated<br />
by a central long hydrophilic region. This topological<br />
pattern was consistent with those of sugar transporters <strong>in</strong> microbes,<br />
mammals, and plants, and the motifs of the monosaccharide<br />
transporter reported by Henderson et al (1992) were<br />
highly conserved among rice (OsMST1–3), castor bean (HXT6),<br />
Arabidopsis (STP1), and humans (GLUT1). Several copies of<br />
the genes encode for the monosaccharide transporter and related<br />
transporters <strong>in</strong> the rice genome and those rice monosaccharide<br />
transporters comprise a multigene family.<br />
To verify whether OsMST1–3 function as monosaccharide<br />
transporters, cDNAs were subcloned <strong>in</strong> a GAL expression<br />
vector and <strong>in</strong>troduced <strong>in</strong>to LBY416, a stra<strong>in</strong> of S. cerevisiae<br />
<strong>in</strong> which high-aff<strong>in</strong>ity glucose transport activity is kept low,<br />
s<strong>in</strong>ce three monosaccharide transporter-related genes, HXT2,<br />
GAL2, and SNF3, have been disrupted. Subcloned cDNAs were<br />
expressed under the control of the GAL2 promoter <strong>in</strong> the presence<br />
of galactose. The addition of HgCl 2 as an SH-group <strong>in</strong>hibitor<br />
completely abolished the transport activity. While<br />
OsMST1 did not show any activity, the glucose transport activity<br />
of OsMST2 and 3 was nearly two and three times higher<br />
than the control activity, respectively. The cell with an empty<br />
vector (control) showed a low level of glucose transport <strong>in</strong> the<br />
absence of HgCl 2 , which was caused by m<strong>in</strong>or sugar<br />
transporter(s) as a background. S<strong>in</strong>ce OsMST3 had the most<br />
<strong>in</strong>tense activity, we used it for further characterization.<br />
To estimate the energy-dependent active transport system<br />
or facilitat<strong>in</strong>g system of OsMST3, we used D-glucose, D-<br />
xylose, and 3-O-methyl glucose (3-OMG), the classical<br />
nonmetabolizable substrate analog for glucose, as transport<br />
substrates. D-glucose showed a 7-fold and 5-fold higher transport<br />
activity (Fig. 1A) than D-xylose (Fig. 1B) and 3-OMG<br />
(Fig. 1C), respectively. Energization uptake by added ethanol<br />
occurred <strong>in</strong> D-xylose and 3-OMG as transport substrates (Fig.<br />
1). The transport of D-xylose <strong>in</strong>creased up to about 8-fold<br />
compared with that of a vector, and add<strong>in</strong>g ethanol resulted <strong>in</strong><br />
a further <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> transport of D-xylose to about 10-fold.<br />
Ethanol seemed to serve as an electron donor of the electrogenic<br />
transmembrane transport of monosaccharides when the<br />
Gene isolation and function 409
Transport (pmol 10 –7 )<br />
800<br />
A OsMST3 (D-glucose)<br />
700<br />
600<br />
500<br />
400<br />
300<br />
200<br />
100<br />
0<br />
0 1 3 5<br />
250<br />
200<br />
150<br />
100<br />
50<br />
C<br />
OsMST3 (3-OMG)<br />
0<br />
0 1 3 5<br />
250<br />
200<br />
150<br />
100<br />
50<br />
B<br />
OsMST3 (D-xylose)<br />
100<br />
0<br />
0<br />
0 1 3 5<br />
0 1 3 5<br />
Uptake time (m<strong>in</strong>)<br />
50<br />
D<br />
Addition of EtOH<br />
No addition<br />
Addition of HgCl 2<br />
pTV3e (D-xylose)<br />
Fig. 1. Transport of D-glucose,<br />
D-xylose, and 3-OMG <strong>in</strong> yeast<br />
cells possess<strong>in</strong>g OsMST3 (A, B,<br />
C) and D-xylose transport <strong>in</strong><br />
cells possess<strong>in</strong>g vector only (D).<br />
Transport <strong>in</strong> yeast cells with or<br />
without additional energization<br />
by 100 mM ethanol <strong>in</strong> yeast<br />
cells <strong>in</strong> the presence or absence<br />
of 0.5 mM HgCl 2 is shown.<br />
applied substrate could not be metabolized by yeast itself. The<br />
uptake level of D-xylose <strong>in</strong> pTV3e rema<strong>in</strong>ed at a considerably<br />
low level dur<strong>in</strong>g the trac<strong>in</strong>g period (5 m<strong>in</strong>) either with or without<br />
ethanol (Fig. 1D). The energization on the plasma membrane<br />
of yeast cells was reversible when uncoupler carbonylcyanide-m-chlorophenyl-hydrazone<br />
(CCCP) was applied (Fig.<br />
2). These results suggested that D-xylose accumulated <strong>in</strong> the<br />
cells was rapidly metabolized and the apparent amount of D-<br />
xylose transported rapidly decreased as a result of the plasma<br />
membrane be<strong>in</strong>g deenergized by CCCP. Because of the acceleration<br />
by energization and the <strong>in</strong>hibition after addition of the<br />
uncoupler, OsMST3 serves as an energy-dependent monosaccharide<br />
transport system, possibly an H + symporter. Accord<strong>in</strong>g<br />
to the classification of transporters <strong>in</strong> liv<strong>in</strong>g cells by Pao et<br />
al (1998), OsMST3 can be classified <strong>in</strong>to the SP (sugar porter)<br />
family <strong>in</strong> MFS (major facilitator superfamily), also called<br />
the uniporter-symporter-antiporter family.<br />
Northern blot analysis us<strong>in</strong>g total RNA from various rice<br />
tissues was conducted to detect OsMST mRNAs. A weak signal<br />
for OsMST3 was detected <strong>in</strong> the expanded leaf blade and<br />
leaf sheath, whereas a relatively strong signal was detected <strong>in</strong><br />
suspension calli and roots (Fig. 3). In situ hybridization us<strong>in</strong>g<br />
the OsMST3 antisense probe showed that OsMST3 was exclusively<br />
expressed <strong>in</strong> sclerenchyma and xylem cells. The cells <strong>in</strong><br />
which OsMST3 was expressed seemed to be dist<strong>in</strong>ctly charac-<br />
D-xylose transport (pmol 10 –7 )<br />
200<br />
175<br />
150<br />
125<br />
100<br />
75<br />
50<br />
25<br />
0<br />
5<br />
EtOH<br />
CCCP<br />
1 3 5 7 9 14 17 21 25<br />
Uptake time (m<strong>in</strong>)<br />
Fig. 2. Effects of ethanol and uncoupler (CCCP) on D-xylose transport<br />
<strong>in</strong> yeast cells possess<strong>in</strong>g OsMST3. The start<strong>in</strong>g concentration<br />
of D-xylose <strong>in</strong> the medium was 0.1 mM and the f<strong>in</strong>al concentration<br />
of CCCP <strong>in</strong> the medium was 50 µM. Arrows <strong>in</strong>dicate the<br />
time of energization with ethanol (100 mM) and the addition of<br />
CCCP.<br />
410 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
Callus<br />
Leaf blade<br />
(grow<strong>in</strong>g)<br />
Leaf blade<br />
(expanded)<br />
Leaf sheath<br />
Root<br />
Dry embryo<br />
OsMST3<br />
rRNA<br />
Fig. 3. Northern blot analysis<br />
of OsMST3 mRNA. Total RNA<br />
(15 µg) of each sample was<br />
electrophoresed on formaldehyde<br />
gel and blotted onto nylon<br />
membrane and then hybridized<br />
with the radio-labeled<br />
cDNA probe. After the wash,<br />
the membrane was exposed<br />
us<strong>in</strong>g a Fujix BAS2000 Bio-Imag<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Analyzer (Fuji Photo Film<br />
Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). Sta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />
with ethidium bromide is<br />
shown <strong>in</strong> the rRNA panel.<br />
teristic of the cell wall; namely, they were thickened cells with<br />
lignified, secondary walls. It is commonly accepted that cellulose,<br />
a simple polymerization of glucose, is synthesized by<br />
UDP-glucose. These results suggested that OsMST3 facilitated<br />
the accumulation of monosaccharides, be<strong>in</strong>g a substrate for<br />
the formation of cellulose when lign<strong>in</strong>s are synthesized <strong>in</strong> the<br />
cell wall at the cell-thicken<strong>in</strong>g stage.<br />
In yeast, two unusual glucose transporters appear to function<br />
as low- and high-glucose sensors, respectively, that produce<br />
an <strong>in</strong>tracellular glucose signal (Özcan et al 1996). Sensor<br />
systems similar to those <strong>in</strong> yeast probably exist <strong>in</strong> multicellular<br />
organisms such as higher plants, which consist of<br />
mosaics of autotrophic green and heterotrophic nongreen cells.<br />
Further characterization is required to clarify the monosaccharide<br />
transport systems <strong>in</strong> plants.<br />
References<br />
Henderson PJ, Baldw<strong>in</strong> SA, Cairns MT, Charalambous BM, Dent<br />
HC, Gunn F, Liang W-J, Lucas VA, Mart<strong>in</strong> GE, McDonald<br />
TP, McKeown BJ, Muiry JAR, Petro KR, Roberts PE, Shatwell<br />
KP, Smith G, Tate CG. 1992. Sugar-cation symport systems<br />
<strong>in</strong> bacteria. Int. Rev. Cytol. 137A:149-208.<br />
Özcan S, Dover J, Rosenwald AG, Wolfl S, Johnston M. 1996. Two<br />
glucose transporters <strong>in</strong> Saccharomyces cerevisiae are glucose<br />
sensors that generate a signal for <strong>in</strong>duction of gene expression.<br />
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93:12428-12432.<br />
Pao SP, Paulsen IT, Saier MH Jr. 1998. Major facilitator superfamily.<br />
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 62:1-34.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ addresses: K. Toyofuku, T. Takeda, and J. Yamaguchi, Bioscience<br />
Center and Graduate School of Bioagricultural Sciences,<br />
Nagoya University, Chikusa, Nagoya 464-8601, Japan;<br />
M. Kasahara, Laboratory of Biophysics, School of Medic<strong>in</strong>e,<br />
Teikyo University, Hachioji, Tokyo 192-0395, Japan. Email:<br />
jjyama@agr.nagoya-u.ac.jp. Present address: Division of Biological<br />
Sciences, Graduate School of Science, Hokkaido University,<br />
Kita-ku N10-W8, Sapporo 060-0810, Japan.<br />
Functional analysis of R2R3-Myb genes <strong>in</strong> rice<br />
J.W. Lee, S.K. Sung, S.K. Yi, and G. An<br />
MYB prote<strong>in</strong>s are transcription factors that conta<strong>in</strong> a doma<strong>in</strong> structurally and functionally related to the DNA b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g doma<strong>in</strong> of<br />
the oncogene c-myb. MYB prote<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong> plants have two related helix-turn-helix motifs, the R2 and R3 repeats. To <strong>in</strong>vestigate the<br />
roles of R2R3-Myb genes <strong>in</strong> rice, we have carried out polymerase cha<strong>in</strong> reaction us<strong>in</strong>g R2R3 degenerate primers <strong>in</strong> cDNA<br />
libraries made from young flowers, mature flowers, and seed coats. We isolated 35 partial cDNA clones of R2R3-Myb genes.<br />
We chose 12 of these clones for further study. Antisense transgenic rice plants were produced to study the function of R2R3-<br />
Myb genes.<br />
Gene isolation and function 411
A<br />
5¢ R2 R3 3¢<br />
B<br />
Forward primer<br />
R2<br />
..+G#WT.eED..L#.Y#..hG.G.W..##+.aGL.R cgKSCLRW#NyLrp.<br />
Forward primer<br />
R3<br />
#+rG.#t..E–.#li.Lh..IG N+Ws.iA..IPgRTDNeiKNyWnt+#.++<br />
Fig. 1. (A) Schematic diagram of plant R2R3-Myb<br />
genes. (B) Consensus am<strong>in</strong>o acid sequence of the<br />
two repeats of plant R2R3-MYB prote<strong>in</strong>s as described<br />
previously (Romero et al 1998). Upper-case<br />
letters <strong>in</strong>dicate residues fully conserved <strong>in</strong> all prote<strong>in</strong>s<br />
used to derive the consensus. Lower-case<br />
letters <strong>in</strong>dicate residues identical <strong>in</strong> at least 80%<br />
of the prote<strong>in</strong>s. Other symbols are: + = basic<br />
am<strong>in</strong>o acid; – = acidic am<strong>in</strong>o acid; # = hydrophobic<br />
am<strong>in</strong>o acid; R = A+G; Y = C+T; S = C+G; D =<br />
A+G+T; N = A+G+T+G.<br />
Plant transcription factors conta<strong>in</strong> a variety of structural motifs<br />
that allow for b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g to specific DNA sequences. For example,<br />
MYB prote<strong>in</strong>s conta<strong>in</strong> a specific type of the helix-turnhelix<br />
motif of about 50 am<strong>in</strong>o acids, which serves as the DNAb<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g<br />
doma<strong>in</strong>. The DNA-b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g doma<strong>in</strong> of plant MYB prote<strong>in</strong>s<br />
is formed by imperfect repeats, R2 and R3, which are<br />
similar to the animal c-MYB prote<strong>in</strong>s (Ros<strong>in</strong>ski and Atchley<br />
1998).<br />
In Arabidopsis, more than 100 genes <strong>in</strong> the R2R3-Myb<br />
family have already been identified (Kranz et al 1998, Romero<br />
et al 1998). Plant MYB prote<strong>in</strong>s play important roles <strong>in</strong> controll<strong>in</strong>g<br />
the cell cycle, cell differentiation, hormone responses,<br />
germ<strong>in</strong>ation, and regulation of secondary metabolism. In rice,<br />
however, only a few Myb genes have been characterized so far<br />
(Suzuki et al 1997, Locatelli et al 2000). To understand the<br />
roles of Myb genes <strong>in</strong> rice, we have isolated 35 Myb genes<br />
from rice flowers and seed coats. We have constructed antisense<br />
plants with 12 <strong>in</strong>dependent clones.<br />
Results and discussion<br />
Clon<strong>in</strong>g of Myb genes from rice<br />
To search for R2R3-Myb genes, partial clones of the Myb genes<br />
were isolated from cDNA libraries made from young flowers,<br />
mature flowers, and seed coats by PCR us<strong>in</strong>g the R2R3-Myb<br />
degenerate oligonucleotides described previously (Fig. 1,<br />
Romero et al 1998). Forward primers were 5′CGGAATTCD<br />
(A,G)(G,A,T,C)AA(A,G)AG(C,T)TG(C,T)AG3′ ,<br />
5′CGGAATTC(A,G,T)(A, G)(G,A,T,C)AA(A,G)AG(C,T)TG<br />
(C,T)CG3′,5′CGGAATTC(A,G,T)(A,G)(G,A,T,C)AA(A,G)TC<br />
(G,A,T,C)TG(C,T)AG3′, 5′CGGAATTC(A,G,T)(A,G)<br />
(G,A,T,C)AA(A,G)TC(G,A,T,C)TG(C,T)CG3′ ,<br />
5′CCCGGGTG(C,T)GG(G,A,T,C)AA(A,G)TC(G,A,T,C)TG3′,<br />
and 5′GGAATTCTG (C,T)GG(G,A,T,C)AA(A,G)AG(C,T)<br />
TG3′. The reverse primers were 3′TG(G,A,T,C)CT(A,G)<br />
TT(A,G)CG(G,A,T,C)(C,T)A(G,A,T,C)TT<br />
CTTAAGGC5′ ,3′ TG(G,A,T,C)CT(A,G)TT(A,G)<br />
CT(C,T)TA(A,G,T)TTCTTAAGGC5′, and 3′TG(G,A,T,C)<br />
CT(A,G)TT(A,G)(A,G)T(G,A,T,C)(C,T) A(G,A,T,C)<br />
TTCTTAAGGC5′.<br />
Sequenc<strong>in</strong>g of these clones resulted <strong>in</strong> the identification<br />
of 35 clones that conta<strong>in</strong>ed partial (average 223 bp) cDNAs of<br />
R2R3-Myb genes. Some clones shared a significant homology<br />
to each other (am<strong>in</strong>o acid sequence identity >95%), and others<br />
were significantly different when am<strong>in</strong>o acid sequences<br />
were compared. These clones can be classified <strong>in</strong>to 16 <strong>in</strong>dependent<br />
genes (Fig. 1). Comparison of the deduced am<strong>in</strong>o acid<br />
sequences of these clones revealed that a 50–80% homology<br />
existed among these prote<strong>in</strong>s.<br />
Phylogenetic analysis of R2R3-MYB prote<strong>in</strong>s<br />
A computer search of DDBJ databases resulted <strong>in</strong> identification<br />
of 56 rice Myb expressed sequence tag (EST) clones from<br />
calli, roots, seedl<strong>in</strong>gs, and flowers. Twenty-six of these EST<br />
clones were found to be redundant (nucleotide sequence identity<br />
>95%). Therefore, there are 30 different Myb EST clones<br />
<strong>in</strong> the databases. Eighteen of these clones conta<strong>in</strong>ed the R2R3-<br />
Myb doma<strong>in</strong>. Of these clones, seven were identical to the Myb<br />
clones isolated <strong>in</strong> this study. A phylogenetic tree of the R2R3-<br />
MYB prote<strong>in</strong>s was constructed with the UPGMA method us<strong>in</strong>g<br />
the R2R3 conserved region sequences of the 27 R2R3-<br />
MYB prote<strong>in</strong>s (Fig. 2).<br />
Among the16 <strong>in</strong>dependent Myb clones isolated from the<br />
flower<strong>in</strong>g stage, only seven were identical to preexist<strong>in</strong>g ESTs.<br />
Most of the EST clones <strong>in</strong> DDBJ databases were obta<strong>in</strong>ed from<br />
vegetative tissues, whereas Myb clones have been isolated from<br />
reproductive tissues.<br />
Construction of b<strong>in</strong>ary vectors<br />
and plant transformation<br />
To study the roles of R2R3-Myb genes <strong>in</strong> rice, antisense b<strong>in</strong>ary<br />
vectors were constructed us<strong>in</strong>g a b<strong>in</strong>ary vector, pGA1611,<br />
that conta<strong>in</strong>s the maize ubiquit<strong>in</strong> promoter, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g the first<br />
<strong>in</strong>tron of the gene. The R2R3-Myb clones were <strong>in</strong>serted <strong>in</strong>to<br />
the multiple clon<strong>in</strong>g sites of the vector <strong>in</strong> an antisense orientation.<br />
The genes were transferred <strong>in</strong>to plant chromosomes by<br />
the Agrobacterium-mediated transformation method. An average<br />
of 10 plants were regenerated per <strong>in</strong>dependent clone. So<br />
far, no phenotypic alterations have been observed <strong>in</strong> the<br />
transgenic plants. A larger number of transgenic plants may<br />
be needed to observe phenotypic changes brought about by<br />
the antisense effects. Alternatively, the phenotype may be visible<br />
only when the plants are exposed to a specific condition.<br />
412 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
#17033 LRWI NYLRPG LKH G V FSP EEEETVMSLHAALGNK WSR IARHLPGR<br />
#17032 LRXIIYLRPG LKXGV FSP EEXETVMSLHAALGXKWSX IARHLPGX<br />
#17053 LRWI NYLRPG LKRGM FSQ EEEDIVI N L QAKLGNK WSQ IAMHLPGR<br />
#17030 LRWA N H LRPN LKK G A F TAEEERLIIQ LHSKMGNK W ARMA AHLPGR<br />
#17034 LRWM N H LRPN LKK G A FSK EEENKIIN LHRKMGNK WSRMA ADL QXR<br />
#17057 LRWI NYLRPD LKRGA FSQ EEED LIIE LHAVLGNRWSQ IAAQLPGR<br />
#17050 LRWI NYLRPD LKRGS FSQQEESLIIE LHRVLGNRWAQIAKHLPGR<br />
#17028 LRWL NYLRPGIKRGNIS GDEEE LILRL RTLLGNRWSL IAGRLPGR<br />
#17062 LRWL NYLRPGIKRGNIS GDEEE LILRLHTLLGNRWSL IAGRLPGR<br />
#17039 LRWI NYLRPD LKRGN F TEEEDELIIK LHELLGNK WSL IAGRLPX R<br />
#17037 LRWI NYLRPDIKRGN FSK EEEDTIIH LHELLGSGWSA IAARXPGR<br />
#17029 LRWT NYLRPD LKRGLLTDAEEQLV I D LHAKLGNRWSK IAAKLPGR<br />
#17055 LRWT NYLRPD LKRGLLTADEEQLVVDLHAKLGNRWSK IAAKLPGR<br />
#17063 LRWL NYLRLDIK H G GYTDQE D R I ICS L YNSIG S RWSI IASKLPGR<br />
#17059 LRWL NYLRPGVRRGSITPEED M V IRE LHSRWGNRWSK IAKHLPGR<br />
#17052 LRWC N Q L S P QVEHRPF TPEEDDTILRAH ARFGNK W ATIARLL A GR<br />
Consensus LRW. N y L rp.#++g.#...E ...##.lh..#Gn+W ..ia..lpgR<br />
Fig. 2. Deduced am<strong>in</strong>o acid<br />
sequences of 16 partial cDNA<br />
clones. The region shown is<br />
that flanked by the sequences<br />
used to derive the oligonucleotide<br />
mixture described previously<br />
(Romero et al 1998).<br />
X denotes a sequenc<strong>in</strong>g error.<br />
17064<br />
17057<br />
AU082324<br />
17050<br />
D47363<br />
C73695<br />
17039<br />
17037<br />
17053<br />
AB010839<br />
17033<br />
17032<br />
17034<br />
17030<br />
AU029559<br />
17055<br />
17029<br />
AU081563<br />
AB010835<br />
17062<br />
17059<br />
D24590<br />
D24724<br />
17063<br />
C72014<br />
17052<br />
AU062424<br />
2<br />
Coefficient of similarity<br />
Fig. 3. Phylogenetic relationships<br />
of rice R2R3-Myb prote<strong>in</strong>s.<br />
The R2R3-Myb clones isolated <strong>in</strong><br />
this study are underl<strong>in</strong>ed.<br />
References<br />
Kranz H, Denekamp M, Greco R, J<strong>in</strong> H, Leyva A, Meissner RC,<br />
Petroni K, Urzaubqui A, Bevan M, Mart<strong>in</strong> C, Smeekens S,<br />
Tonelli C, Paz-Ares J, Weisshaar B. 1998. Towards functional<br />
characterization of the members of the R2R3-Myb gene family<br />
from Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 16(2):263-276.<br />
Locatelli F, Bracale M, Magaraggia F, Faoro F, Manzocchi LA,<br />
Coraggio I. 2000. The product of the rice myb7 unspliced<br />
mRNA dimerizes with the maize leuc<strong>in</strong>e zipper Opaque2 and<br />
stimulates its activity <strong>in</strong> a transient expression assay. J. Biol.<br />
Chem. 275(23):17619-17625.<br />
Romero I, Fuertes A, Benito M, Malpica JM, Leyva A, Paz-Ares J.<br />
1998. More than 80 R2R3-MYB regulatory genes <strong>in</strong> the genome<br />
of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 14(3):273-284.<br />
Ros<strong>in</strong>ski JA, Atchley WR. 1998. Molecular evolution of the Myb<br />
family of transcription factors: evidence for polyphyletic orig<strong>in</strong>.<br />
J. Mol. Evol. 46:74-83.<br />
Suzuki A, Suzuki T, Tanabe F, Washida H, Wu CY, Takaiwa F. 1997.<br />
Clon<strong>in</strong>g and expression of five myb-related genes from rice<br />
seed. Gene 198(1-2):393-398.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ address: National Research Laboratory of Plant Functional<br />
Genomics, Division of Molecular and Life Sciences, Pohang<br />
University of Science and Technology, Pohang 790-784, Korea.<br />
Gene isolation and function 413
Functional analysis of MADS-box genes expressed<br />
preferentially <strong>in</strong> vegetative tissues<br />
S.Y. Lee, S.H. Jang, S.H. Jun, and G.H. An<br />
MADS-box genes encode transcription factors that are <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> regulat<strong>in</strong>g various developmental processes. Three MADSbox<br />
genes (OsMADS50, OsMADS51, OsMADS52), which are expressed preferentially <strong>in</strong> vegetative organs, were selected for<br />
functional analysis. The dendrogram analysis showed that these genes were evolutionally separated from the MADS-box genes<br />
that are preferentially expressed <strong>in</strong> floral organs. Northern blot analyses displayed their characteristic expression pattern <strong>in</strong><br />
vegetative organs. The analysis us<strong>in</strong>g a yeast two-hybrid system revealed that there were almost no <strong>in</strong>teractions between the<br />
vegetative MADS-box prote<strong>in</strong>s and the floral MADS-box prote<strong>in</strong>s. Transgenic rice plants express<strong>in</strong>g OsMADS52 <strong>in</strong> a sense<br />
orientation showed characteristic phenotypes such as dwarfism, twisted root/shoot growth, early senescence, and spotted<br />
leaves. These phenotypes phenocopied wild-type seedl<strong>in</strong>gs treated with 1-am<strong>in</strong>ocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid. These phenotypes<br />
were partially recovered by treatment of the ethylene <strong>in</strong>hibitor, AgNO 3<br />
.<br />
<strong>Rice</strong> has been an important cereal as a staple food of many<br />
countries, and now it has become the model plant of monocots<br />
such as wheat, maize, oat, and barley. Functional analysis of<br />
rice genes is important. We have been study<strong>in</strong>g rice MADSbox<br />
genes, which belong to an important gene family that regulates<br />
plant development at various stages. There has been a<br />
significant advance <strong>in</strong> functional analysis of MADS-box genes<br />
<strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> reproductive organ development. However, little<br />
is known about the function of the MADS-box genes expressed<br />
<strong>in</strong> vegetative organs. Flower locus C (FLC) and short vegetative<br />
phase (SVP) as repressors of flower<strong>in</strong>g were discussed<br />
(Sheldon et al 1999, Hartmann et al 2000). An NO 3 -<strong>in</strong>ducible<br />
Arabidopsis gene (ANR1), whose expression is <strong>in</strong>duced by<br />
nitrogen <strong>in</strong> roots, was thought to be <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> the developmental<br />
plasticity <strong>in</strong> Arabidopsis roots (Zhang and Forde 1998).<br />
Three rice MADS-box genes (OsMADS50, OsMADS51, and<br />
OsMADS52), which are expressed preferentially <strong>in</strong> vegetative<br />
organs, have been selected for functional analysis.<br />
Results and discussion<br />
Several MADS-box genes that are expressed <strong>in</strong> vegetative tissues<br />
are present <strong>in</strong> expressed sequence tag databases. We isolated<br />
three MADS-box genes (AB003328, AB003327, and<br />
AB003326) from root and sheath libraries by polymerase cha<strong>in</strong><br />
reaction (Sh<strong>in</strong>ozuka et al 1999). We renamed these genes<br />
OsMADS50, OsMADS51, and OsMADS52. A comparison of<br />
these genes with other MADS-box genes showed that these<br />
genes are evolutionally divergent from the MADS-box genes<br />
that are preferentially expressed <strong>in</strong> floral organs (Fig. 1). The<br />
OsMADS52 prote<strong>in</strong> was the most homologous to AGL12 and<br />
showed 49% am<strong>in</strong>o acid identity with the prote<strong>in</strong> (Roundsley<br />
et al 1995). The OsMADS50 prote<strong>in</strong> was 50% identical to<br />
AGL20.<br />
To study the expression pattern of these genes, Northern<br />
blot analyses were performed. OsMADS50 was strongly expressed<br />
<strong>in</strong> seedl<strong>in</strong>g shoots and mature leaves, whereas<br />
OsMADS51 was more strongly expressed <strong>in</strong> seedl<strong>in</strong>g shoots<br />
and roots. The OsMADS52 gene was preferentially expressed<br />
<strong>in</strong> seedl<strong>in</strong>g roots. An Arabidopsis MADS-box gene, AGL12,<br />
which showed a high sequence homology to OsMADS52, was<br />
also preferentially expressed <strong>in</strong> the roots, suggest<strong>in</strong>g that<br />
OsMADS52 may be a homologue of AGL12.<br />
Intermolecular <strong>in</strong>teractions between these MADS-box<br />
prote<strong>in</strong>s and MADS-box prote<strong>in</strong>s that are expressed <strong>in</strong> floral<br />
tissues (OsMADS1, 3, 4, 6, 14, 15, and 16) were <strong>in</strong>vestigated<br />
by the yeast two-hybrid system. The results showed that<br />
OsMADS52 weakly <strong>in</strong>teracted with OsMADS1 and<br />
OsMADS6, and the prote<strong>in</strong> did not <strong>in</strong>teract with the other<br />
MADS-box prote<strong>in</strong>s. OsMADS50 and OsMADS51 did not <strong>in</strong>teract<br />
with any MADS-box prote<strong>in</strong>s. Furthermore,<br />
OsMADS50, OsMADS51, and OsMADS52 did not form<br />
homodimers <strong>in</strong> the yeast system.<br />
Transgenic rice plants express<strong>in</strong>g either sense or<br />
antisense constructs of these genes were produced. The<br />
transgenic plants that ectopically expressed OsMADS52 <strong>in</strong> a<br />
sense orientation showed several phenotypes (Fig. 2). Plants<br />
1, 2, 3, and 4 showed early senescence and eventually died. In<br />
plant 2, root development was severely retarded and shoots<br />
were twisted. Plants 1 and 4 developed more roots than did<br />
the wild type. In addition, their roots were partially twisted.<br />
Plant 3 showed almost normal root development, but its roots<br />
displayed early senescence. Plant 5 showed twisted roots. Plant<br />
6 exhibited spotted leaves (Fig. 2, sample 7).<br />
The phenotypes suggested that the alternations <strong>in</strong><br />
transgenic plants were probably due to ethylene overproduction.<br />
To <strong>in</strong>vestigate the possibility, the effects of ethylene on<br />
the wild-type rice seedl<strong>in</strong>gs were tested with various concentration<br />
of 1-am<strong>in</strong>ocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC), a<br />
precursor of ethylene (Fig. 3A). Seedl<strong>in</strong>g roots became twisted<br />
at 1 µM ACC, and seedl<strong>in</strong>g shoots showed dwarfism, chlorosis,<br />
and twisted phenotypes at 100 µM ACC. These phenotypes<br />
were similar to those of transgenic plants express<strong>in</strong>g<br />
OsMADS52, support<strong>in</strong>g the hypothesis that transgenic phenotypes<br />
may be due to ethylene overproduction. To further confirm<br />
the possibility, the transgenic rice plants were treated with<br />
414 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
AGL12<br />
AP1<br />
OsMADS6<br />
OsMADS52<br />
OsMADS5<br />
OsMADS51<br />
PI<br />
OsMADS2<br />
OsMADS4<br />
OsMADS16<br />
AP3<br />
ANR1<br />
SVP<br />
AGL17<br />
OsMADS3<br />
AG<br />
AGL14<br />
AGL20<br />
OsMADS50<br />
FLC<br />
Fig. 1. Dendrogram of various<br />
MADS-box prote<strong>in</strong>s of rice and<br />
Arabidopsis, constructed us<strong>in</strong>g<br />
the PHYLIP software<br />
(Felsenste<strong>in</strong> 1993).<br />
1 2 3 4<br />
References<br />
1 2 3<br />
Fig. 2. Phenotypes of transgenic plants express<strong>in</strong>g<br />
OsMADS52. Regenerated plants were grown<br />
on a root<strong>in</strong>g medium: 1 = plant 1; 2 = plant 2;<br />
3 = plant 3; 4 = plant 4; 5 = plant 5; 6 = older<br />
roots of plant 5; 7 = plant 6.<br />
AgNO 3 at 10 nM or 1 µM (Fig. 3B, C). The roots of the<br />
transgenic plants treated with AgNO 3 grew straight and faster<br />
than did those of untreated transgenic plants. It can be concluded<br />
that OsMADS52 appears to control ethylene production.<br />
Felsenste<strong>in</strong> J. 1993. PHYLIP (Phylogeny Inference Package) version<br />
3.5c. Department of <strong>Genetics</strong>, University of Wash<strong>in</strong>gton,<br />
Seattle.<br />
Hartmann U, Hohmann S, Nettesheim K, Wisman E, Saedler H,<br />
Huijser P. 2000. Molecular clon<strong>in</strong>g of SVP: a negative regulator<br />
of the floral transition <strong>in</strong> Arabidopsis. Plant J. 21:351-<br />
360.<br />
Rounsley SD, Ditta GS, Yanofsky MF. 1995. Diverse roles for MADS<br />
box genes <strong>in</strong> Arabidopsis development. Plant Cell. 7:1259-<br />
1269.<br />
Sheldon CC, Burn JE, Perez PP, Metzger J, Edwards JA, Peacock<br />
WJ, Dennis ES. 1999. The FLF MADS box gene: a repressor<br />
of flower<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Arabidopsis regulated by vernalization and<br />
methylation. Plant Cell. 11:445-458.<br />
Sh<strong>in</strong>ozuka Y, Kojima S, Shomura A, Ichimura H, Yano M, Yamamoto<br />
K, Sasaki T. 1999. Isolation and characterization of rice MADS<br />
box gene homologues and their RFLP mapp<strong>in</strong>g. DNA Res.<br />
6:123-129.<br />
Zhang H, Forde BG. 1998. An Arabidopsis MADS box gene that<br />
controls nutrient-<strong>in</strong>duced changes <strong>in</strong> root architecture. Science<br />
279:407-409.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ addresses: National Research Laboratory of Plant Functional<br />
Genomics, Division of Molecular and Life Sciences,<br />
Pohang University of Science and Technology, Pohang 790-<br />
784, Republic of Korea.<br />
Gene isolation and function 415
A<br />
1 2 3 4 5 6<br />
B<br />
1 2 3 C 1 2<br />
Fig. 3. Effects of ethylene on wild-type<br />
seedl<strong>in</strong>gs and effects of AgNO 3 on<br />
transgenic plants express<strong>in</strong>g<br />
OsMADS52. (A) Various concentrations<br />
of ACC were applied to rice seedl<strong>in</strong>gs<br />
14 d after sow<strong>in</strong>g. 1 = 1 nM; 2 = 10<br />
nM; 3 = 100 nM; 4 = 1 µM; 5 = 10<br />
µM; 6 = 100 µM. (B) Roots of<br />
transgenic plants treated with AgNO 3 .<br />
1 = 0 µM; 2 = 10 nM; 3 = 1 µM. (C)<br />
Roots of transgenic plants treated with<br />
various concentrations of AgNO 3 . 1 =<br />
0 µM; 2 = 1 µM.<br />
Functional analysis of prote<strong>in</strong> phosphatase 2C <strong>in</strong> rice<br />
K. Yang, D.H. Jeong, and G. An<br />
Prote<strong>in</strong> phosphorylation and dephosphorylation are major regulatory mechanisms that cells use to transmit signals from their<br />
extracellular environment to the <strong>in</strong>terior. Two structurally dist<strong>in</strong>ct groups of ser<strong>in</strong>e/threon<strong>in</strong>e phosphatases are known: the PP1/<br />
PP2A family and the PP2C family. Here, we focus on the functions related to development and stress response. We have<br />
obta<strong>in</strong>ed six rice expressed sequence tag clones that conta<strong>in</strong> the highly conserved KAPP catalytic doma<strong>in</strong>. In addition, we have<br />
isolated three clones from a young panicle cDNA library by polymerase cha<strong>in</strong> reaction us<strong>in</strong>g degenerate primers. RNA gel blot<br />
analysis showed that some of these genes are expressed constitutively, while others are preferentially expressed <strong>in</strong> certa<strong>in</strong><br />
tissue. We also present data on <strong>in</strong>ducibility of genes to stresses such as cold, salt, and abscisic acid. The yeast two-hybrid<br />
system is be<strong>in</strong>g employed to f<strong>in</strong>d regulatory partners or substrates of the PP2C clones. Transgenic plants express<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
antisense constructs of the genes are be<strong>in</strong>g analyzed to determ<strong>in</strong>e the functional roles of the PP2C clones.<br />
Prote<strong>in</strong> phosphorylation and dephosphorylation are major<br />
mechanisms <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> convey<strong>in</strong>g developmental signals and<br />
environmental <strong>in</strong>formation to the cell. These functions are<br />
carried out by prote<strong>in</strong> k<strong>in</strong>ases and phosphatases. On the basis<br />
of substrate specificity, prote<strong>in</strong> phosphatases are classified <strong>in</strong>to<br />
two major groups: tyros<strong>in</strong>e and ser<strong>in</strong>e/threon<strong>in</strong>e phosphatase.<br />
The ser<strong>in</strong>e/threon<strong>in</strong>e phosphatases are <strong>in</strong> turn divided <strong>in</strong>to the<br />
PP1/PP2A family and the PP2C family. PP2Cs require Mg 2+<br />
or Mn 2+ for their activity and are <strong>in</strong>sensitive to ocadaic acid,<br />
an <strong>in</strong>hibitor of PP1/PP2A enzymes (Cohen 1989).<br />
Several functional roles of PP2Cs have been reported.<br />
Genetic studies have shown that ABI1 has functions related<br />
to the signal transduction cascade of abscisic acid (ABA).<br />
Moreover, k<strong>in</strong>ase-associated prote<strong>in</strong> phosphatase is known to<br />
be an important element <strong>in</strong> flower meristem development<br />
(Stone et al 1994). In addition, an alfalfa PP2C that was named<br />
MP2C has been found to act as a negative regulator of stressactivated<br />
mitogen-activated prote<strong>in</strong> k<strong>in</strong>ase (Meskiene et al<br />
1998).<br />
Results and discussion<br />
Molecular clon<strong>in</strong>g of prote<strong>in</strong> phosphatase<br />
2C (PP2C) <strong>in</strong> rice<br />
Prote<strong>in</strong> phosphatases <strong>in</strong> the 2C family conta<strong>in</strong> 11 conserved<br />
motifs that are scattered along the catalytic sequence (Bork et<br />
al 1996). We obta<strong>in</strong>ed six expressed sequence tag (EST) clones<br />
(D39634, D41977, D47609, C73034, D46746, and D24960)<br />
from the M<strong>in</strong>istry of Agriculture, Forestry, and Fisheries DNA<br />
bank that conta<strong>in</strong>ed some of these conserved motifs. These<br />
416 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
Motif 1 Motif 11<br />
OsKAPP catalytic<br />
doma<strong>in</strong><br />
Motif 2 Motif 8<br />
kb<br />
Ospp2c1 (D47609) 1.1<br />
Ospp2c2 (D41977) 1.0<br />
Ospp2c3 (D24960) 1.1<br />
SacI<br />
Ospp2c4 (D46746) 1.6<br />
SacI<br />
Ospp2c5 (C73034) 1.0<br />
Ospp2c6 (D39634) 1.0<br />
Ospp2c7 0.6<br />
Ospp2c8 0.6<br />
Ospp2c9 0.6<br />
Fig. 1. The lengths and positions<br />
of Ospp2c clones relative<br />
to OsKAPP catalytic doma<strong>in</strong>.<br />
Full lengths of these<br />
clones, except Ospp2c4 and<br />
Ospp2c5, are used for Northern<br />
blot probes and construction<br />
of antisense vectors. The<br />
broken l<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong>dicate the DNA<br />
probes made from Ospp2c4<br />
and Ospp2c5.<br />
EST clones averaged 1.1 kb <strong>in</strong> length. One of these clones<br />
(D46746) had the complete catalytic sequence but the others<br />
had none (Fig. 1).<br />
In addition to these EST clones, we isolated three putative<br />
PP2C clones from a young panicle cDNA library by polymerase<br />
cha<strong>in</strong> reaction us<strong>in</strong>g degenerate primers (Fig. 1). The<br />
degenerate primers were based on the sequences of motif 2<br />
(5′-TI[T/C]GA[T/C]GG[G/A/T/C]CA[T/C]GG[G/A/T/C]GG-<br />
3′) and motif 8 (5′-[A/T][T/C][G/A]TCCCA[T/C]AA[G/A/T/<br />
C]CCGTC-3′, 5′-[A/T][T/C][G/A]TCCCA[G/A/T/C]A[G/<br />
C][G/A/T/C]CCATC-3′, 5′-[A/T][T/C][G/A]TCCCA[G/A/T/<br />
C]A[G/C][G/A/T/C]CCGTC-3′), which were highly conserved<br />
among the plant PP2C clones (Rodriquez 1998). We named<br />
these n<strong>in</strong>e clones Ospp2cs (Fig. 1).<br />
Ospp2c1<br />
Ospp2c2<br />
Ospp2c3<br />
Ospp2c4<br />
Ospp2c5<br />
Lane<br />
1 2 3 4 5 6<br />
kb<br />
1.3<br />
1.4<br />
1.6<br />
1.6<br />
1.5<br />
RNA expression level analysis of Ospp2cs<br />
The transcripts of several Ospp2c clones were analyzed for<br />
tissue specificity and for stress responsibility by Northern blot.<br />
The results showed that Ospp2c4 was transcribed preferentially<br />
<strong>in</strong> panicles and mature flowers. The transcripts of<br />
Ospp2c5 were most abundant <strong>in</strong> mature leaves (Fig. 2). However,<br />
the transcripts of the other clones (Ospp2c1, 2, and 3)<br />
did not show any tissue or development specificity (Fig. 2).<br />
To exam<strong>in</strong>e whether these clones are <strong>in</strong>duced by cold<br />
stress or ABA treatment, 10-d-old seedl<strong>in</strong>gs were kept at 17<br />
°C for 3, 6, 12, and 24 h and were treated with ABA at 10, 25,<br />
50, and 100 µM for 6 h. However, the transcripts of Ospp2cs<br />
were not <strong>in</strong>fluenced by these treatments (data not shown).<br />
rDNA<br />
Fig. 2. Northern blot analysis of Ospp2cs. 1 = seedl<strong>in</strong>g<br />
shoots (10 d); 2 = seedl<strong>in</strong>g roots (10 d); 3 = mature<br />
leaves (8 wk); 4 = immature panicles smaller than<br />
5 cm; 5 = panicles at 5–10-cm length stage; 6 =<br />
panicles taller than 10 cm. rDNA <strong>in</strong>dicates Arabidopsis<br />
18S ribosomal DNA.<br />
Gene isolation and function 417
RB P ubiquit<strong>in</strong> Insert T nos P 35S Hph T 7 LB<br />
Fig. 3. Schematic map of the b<strong>in</strong>ary vector pGA1611 used for transformation. RB =<br />
right border, P ubiquit<strong>in</strong> = maize ubiquit<strong>in</strong> promoter, T nos = nos term<strong>in</strong>ator, P 35S = cauliflower<br />
mosaic virus 35S promoter, Hph = hygromyc<strong>in</strong> phosphotransferase, T 7 =<br />
term<strong>in</strong>ator of the 7 gene of pTiA6, LB = left border.<br />
Ospp2c antisense transgenic rice plants<br />
We have produced antisense transgenic rice plants by<br />
Agrobacterium-mediated transformation us<strong>in</strong>g b<strong>in</strong>ary vectors<br />
that we have constructed (Fig. 3). About 30 rice plants for each<br />
clone (Ospp2c 1–9) have been produced and analyzed for development<br />
abnormalities. However, we did not notice any abnormal<br />
phenotypes at the preflower<strong>in</strong>g stage. We will exam<strong>in</strong>e<br />
whether the transgenic rice plants will show mutant phenotypes<br />
at later developmental stages. If, however, the functions<br />
of these clones are redundant, we will not be able to see any<br />
abnormality. In that case, it may be better to produce transgenic<br />
rice that overexpresses these clones to determ<strong>in</strong>e the function.<br />
Analysis of the transcript levels and mutant phenotype<br />
of transgenic rice was not enough to understand the functions<br />
of Ospp2cs. A study of the regulatory elements or substrates<br />
as well as enzyme activity would be important. Therefore, we<br />
plan to do yeast two-hybrid screens with Ospp2cs as bait and<br />
phosphatase enzyme activity assays.<br />
References<br />
Bork P, Brown NP, Hegyi H, Schultz J. 1996. The prote<strong>in</strong> phosphatase<br />
2C (PP2C) superfamily: detection of bacterial homologues.<br />
Prote<strong>in</strong> Sci. 5:1421-1425.<br />
Cohen P. 1989. The structure and regulation of prote<strong>in</strong> phosphatases.<br />
Annu. Rev. Biochem. 58:453-508.<br />
Meskiene I, Bogre L, Glaser W, Balog J, Brandstotter M, Zwerger<br />
K, Ammerer G, Hirt H. 1998. MP2C, a plant prote<strong>in</strong> phosphatase<br />
2C, functions as a negative regulator of mitogen-activated<br />
prote<strong>in</strong> k<strong>in</strong>ase pathways <strong>in</strong> yeast and plants. Proc. Natl.<br />
Acad. Sci. USA 95:1938-1943.<br />
Rodriguez PL. 1998. Prote<strong>in</strong> phosphatase 2C (PP2C) function <strong>in</strong><br />
higher plants. Plant Mol. Biol. 38:919-927.<br />
Stone JM, Coll<strong>in</strong>ge MA, Smith RD, Horn MA, Walker JC. 1994.<br />
Interaction of a prote<strong>in</strong> phosphatase with an Arabidopsis<br />
ser<strong>in</strong>e-threon<strong>in</strong>e receptor k<strong>in</strong>ase. Science 266:793-795.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ address: National Research Laboratory of Plant Functional<br />
Genomics, Department of Life Science, Pohang University of<br />
Science and Technology, Pohang 790-784, Korea.<br />
Functions of mitochondrial aldehyde dehydrogenase<br />
<strong>in</strong> rice under anaerobic conditions<br />
M. Nakazono, Y. Li, H. Tsuji, N. Tsutsumi, and A. Hirai<br />
Alcoholic fermentation is important for the survival of plants under anaerobic conditions. Acetaldehyde, one of the <strong>in</strong>termediates<br />
of alcoholic fermentation, is not only reduced by alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) but can also be oxidized by aldehyde<br />
dehydrogenase (ALDH). To determ<strong>in</strong>e whether ALDH plays a role <strong>in</strong> anaerobic metabolism <strong>in</strong> rice, we characterized a cDNA<br />
clone encod<strong>in</strong>g mitochondrial ALDH from rice (Aldh2a). Analysis of the subcellular localization of ALDH2a prote<strong>in</strong> and an <strong>in</strong><br />
vitro ALDH assay <strong>in</strong>dicated that ALDH2a oxidizes acetaldehyde <strong>in</strong> mitochondria. A Southern blot analysis <strong>in</strong>dicated that mitochondrial<br />
ALDH is encoded by at least two genes <strong>in</strong> rice. We found that the Aldh2a mRNA was present at high levels <strong>in</strong> leaves<br />
of dark-grown seedl<strong>in</strong>gs, mature leaf sheaths, and panicles. Expression of the rice Aldh2a gene, unlike the expression of the<br />
tobacco Aldh2a gene, was <strong>in</strong>duced <strong>in</strong> rice seedl<strong>in</strong>gs by submergence. A possible <strong>in</strong>volvement of ALDH2a <strong>in</strong> the submergence<br />
tolerance of rice is discussed.<br />
Glycolysis and alcoholic fermentation are important for energy<br />
production dur<strong>in</strong>g seed germ<strong>in</strong>ation, especially <strong>in</strong> anaerobic<br />
environments (Perata and Alpi 1993). Alcoholic fermentation<br />
consists of two steps: the decarboxylation of pyruvate<br />
to acetaldehyde catalyzed by pyruvate decarboxylase (PDC),<br />
followed by reduction of acetaldehyde to ethanol with the concomitant<br />
oxidation of NADH to NAD + catalyzed by alcohol<br />
dehydrogenase (ADH) (Perata and Alpi 1993). This metabolic<br />
pathway is recognized as the pr<strong>in</strong>cipal catalytic pathway for<br />
recycl<strong>in</strong>g NAD + to ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> glycolysis and the ATP level <strong>in</strong><br />
the absence of oxygen. The expression of the genes <strong>in</strong>volved<br />
<strong>in</strong> glycolysis and alcoholic fermentation (e.g., ADH, PDC, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate<br />
dehydrogenase, enolase) is dramatically<br />
<strong>in</strong>duced by anaerobiosis (Sachs et al 1996).<br />
418 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
11-day-old seedl<strong>in</strong>gs<br />
3-month-old plants<br />
Leaves (light)<br />
Leaves (dark)<br />
Roots (light)<br />
Roots (dark)<br />
Leaf blades<br />
Leaf sheaths<br />
Young panicles<br />
Panicles after<br />
head<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Aldh2a<br />
(1.9 kb)<br />
Fig. 1. Northern hybridization<br />
analysis of transcripts of the<br />
Aldh2a gene <strong>in</strong> various organs.<br />
Each lane was loaded with 5 µg<br />
total RNA extracted from young<br />
leaves and young roots (of 11-<br />
d-old seedl<strong>in</strong>gs under light or<br />
dark conditions), mature leaf<br />
blades, mature leaf sheaths,<br />
young panicles, and panicles<br />
after head<strong>in</strong>g. The size of the<br />
transcript of Aldh2a (1.9 kb) is<br />
shown by the arrow at the right.<br />
Aldehyde dehydrogenases [aldehyde:NAD(P) + oxidoreductases]<br />
(ALDHs) are a group of enzymes catalyz<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
conversion of aldehydes to the correspond<strong>in</strong>g acids. Mitochondrial<br />
ALDH prote<strong>in</strong> (ALDH2) exhibits a high activity for oxidiz<strong>in</strong>g<br />
acetaldehyde, an <strong>in</strong>termediate of alcoholic fermentation,<br />
and is thought to play an important role <strong>in</strong> detoxify<strong>in</strong>g<br />
acetaldehyde. In 1996, a gene for mitochondrial ALDH was<br />
identified <strong>in</strong> maize (Cui et al 1996). The gene, rf2, was found<br />
to be a nuclear restorer gene of Texas-type cytoplasmic male<br />
sterility (cms-T). Subsequently, <strong>in</strong> tobacco, two Aldh genes<br />
(Aldh2a and Aldh2b) were identified, and the Aldh2a transcript<br />
and the ALDH2a prote<strong>in</strong> were found to be present at<br />
high levels <strong>in</strong> floral tissues, especially stamens, pistils, and<br />
pollen (op Den Camp and Kuhlemeier 1997). Under anaerobic<br />
conditions, the expression of Adh and Pdc is <strong>in</strong>duced <strong>in</strong><br />
tobacco leaves, but the expression of Aldh2a is not. Therefore,<br />
tobacco ALDH2a does not seem to function <strong>in</strong> anaerobic<br />
environments (op Den Camp and Kuhlemeier 1997). In this<br />
study, we characterized a cDNA clone encod<strong>in</strong>g mitochondrial<br />
ALDH from rice. We estimated the possible function of rice<br />
ALDH2a under anaerobic conditions.<br />
Materials and methods<br />
<strong>Rice</strong> (Oryza sativa L. cv. Nipponbare) was grown under light<br />
conditions at 28 o C for 10 d to extract total DNA. To extract<br />
total RNA, leaves and roots of seedl<strong>in</strong>gs that were grown <strong>in</strong><br />
the light or <strong>in</strong> the dark at 28 o C for 11 d were used. Mature leaf<br />
blades, mature leaf sheaths, and young panicles from 3-moold<br />
plants and panicles taken after head<strong>in</strong>g from 3.5-mo-old<br />
plants were prepared. To study oxygen deprivation, 7-d-old<br />
aerobically grown seedl<strong>in</strong>gs were submerged <strong>in</strong> the dark at 28<br />
o<br />
C for 12, 24, and 36 h. After 36 h, the submerged seedl<strong>in</strong>gs<br />
were transferred to aerobic conditions <strong>in</strong> the dark at 28 o C for<br />
12 and 24 h.<br />
Southern hybridization, Northern hybridization, and an<br />
analysis of subcellular localization of ALDH2a prote<strong>in</strong> were<br />
carried out by the method previously described (Li et al 2000).<br />
Results and discussion<br />
To determ<strong>in</strong>e whether ALDH plays a role <strong>in</strong> anaerobic metabolism<br />
<strong>in</strong> rice, we characterized a cDNA clone encod<strong>in</strong>g<br />
mitochondrial ALDH2 (Aldh2a) from rice. Analysis of the<br />
subcellular localization of ALDH2a prote<strong>in</strong> us<strong>in</strong>g green fluorescent<br />
prote<strong>in</strong> (GFP) and an <strong>in</strong> vitro ALDH assay us<strong>in</strong>g prote<strong>in</strong><br />
extracts from Escherichia coli cells that overexpressed<br />
ALDH2a <strong>in</strong>dicated that ALDH2a functions <strong>in</strong> oxidiz<strong>in</strong>g acetaldehyde<br />
<strong>in</strong> mitochondria. Southern blot hybridization was<br />
carried out us<strong>in</strong>g the cod<strong>in</strong>g region of Aldh2a as a probe. The<br />
result <strong>in</strong>dicated that mitochondrial ALDH2 is encoded by at<br />
least two genes <strong>in</strong> rice.<br />
The expression of the Aldh2a gene was exam<strong>in</strong>ed by<br />
Northern hybridization by determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the relative steady-state<br />
mRNA amounts <strong>in</strong> different organs of rice. Us<strong>in</strong>g total RNAs<br />
extracted from young leaves and young roots of 11-d-old seedl<strong>in</strong>gs<br />
grown under light or dark conditions, mature leaf blades,<br />
mature leaf sheaths, young panicles, and panicles after head<strong>in</strong>g,<br />
a s<strong>in</strong>gle transcript of approximately 1.9 kb was observed<br />
(Fig. 1). The steady-state levels of the Aldh2a transcript <strong>in</strong><br />
leaves of 11-d-old seedl<strong>in</strong>gs were higher than those <strong>in</strong> roots.<br />
Furthermore, the amounts of mRNA <strong>in</strong> tissues grown under<br />
darkness were higher than those <strong>in</strong> tissues grown <strong>in</strong> the light.<br />
In mature rice plants, high relative amounts of the Aldh2a<br />
mRNA were detected <strong>in</strong> young panicles, panicles after head<strong>in</strong>g,<br />
and leaf sheaths.<br />
<strong>Rice</strong> has a higher tolerance for anaerobic conditions than<br />
does tobacco. The expression of rice Adh1 (Xie and Wu 1989)<br />
and rice Pdc1 (Hoss<strong>in</strong> et al 1996) is <strong>in</strong>duced <strong>in</strong> an anaerobic<br />
environment. To determ<strong>in</strong>e whether the expression of the rice<br />
mitochondrial ALDH gene (Aldh2a) is also <strong>in</strong>duced under such<br />
conditions, we submerged 7-d-old seedl<strong>in</strong>gs grown under aerobic<br />
conditions for 12, 24, and 36 h <strong>in</strong> the dark and then subjected<br />
them to a Northern hybridization analysis us<strong>in</strong>g probes<br />
specific to Aldh2a. We also <strong>in</strong>vestigated the expression of Adh1<br />
and Pdc1. The steady-state levels of the Aldh2a, Adh1, and<br />
Pdc1 mRNAs were <strong>in</strong>creased dramatically by the submergence<br />
Gene isolation and function 419
Submerged<br />
Aerobic<br />
0 12 24 36 36/12 36/24<br />
(h)<br />
Aldh2a<br />
(1.9 kb)<br />
Adh1<br />
(1.6 kb)<br />
Pdc1<br />
(2.4 kb)<br />
Fig. 2. Expression of Aldh2a, Adh1, and Pdc1 is <strong>in</strong>duced<br />
under submerged conditions. Seven-day-old seedl<strong>in</strong>gs<br />
grown <strong>in</strong> an aerobic environment <strong>in</strong> the light were submerged<br />
<strong>in</strong> the dark for 12, 24, and 36 h. After 36 h,<br />
seedl<strong>in</strong>gs were returned to aerobic conditions <strong>in</strong> the<br />
dark for 12 and 24 h (36/12 and 36/24, respectively).<br />
The sizes of the transcripts of Aldh2a (1.9 kb), Adh1<br />
(1.6 kb), and Pdc1 (2.4 kb) are shown by the arrows at<br />
the right.<br />
treatment (Fig. 2). When the submerged seedl<strong>in</strong>gs were transferred<br />
to an aerobic environment, the amounts of these transcripts<br />
decreased. This <strong>in</strong>dicated that ALDH2a, like ADH1<br />
and PDC1, is <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> anaerobic metabolism.<br />
op Den Camp and Kuhlemeier (1997) reported that tobacco<br />
Aldh2a transcript levels did not <strong>in</strong>crease dur<strong>in</strong>g anaerobiosis<br />
<strong>in</strong> leaf tissue, and proposed that a pathway <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g<br />
ALDH is not important for normal metabolism <strong>in</strong> tobacco<br />
leaves, even <strong>in</strong> anaerobiosis. In prelim<strong>in</strong>ary studies, we found<br />
that expression of the Arabidopsis ALDH2a gene was also not<br />
enhanced under submerged conditions (data not shown). We<br />
propose that rice may have a greater ability than tobacco and<br />
Arabidopsis to detoxify acetaldehyde, which is produced dur<strong>in</strong>g<br />
alcoholic fermentation <strong>in</strong> anaerobiosis, by both ALDH and<br />
ADH. Higher levels of ALDH may be one of the reasons why<br />
rice is more tolerant of submergence than other plant species<br />
such as tobacco and Arabidopsis. To date, it is unclear whether<br />
expression of the Aldh2 gene is enhanced under anaerobic<br />
conditions <strong>in</strong> maize and wheat. It will be of <strong>in</strong>terest to exam<strong>in</strong>e<br />
the expression of these Aldh2 genes dur<strong>in</strong>g submergence.<br />
Under anaerobic conditions, fermentation regenerates<br />
NAD + from NADH, allow<strong>in</strong>g plant cells to cont<strong>in</strong>ue glycolysis<br />
and ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> the ATP level (Perata and Alpi 1993). The<br />
conversion of acetaldehyde to acetate by ALDH consumes<br />
NAD + , and this consumption could potentially block glycolysis.<br />
However, the hypoxia-<strong>in</strong>ducible ALDH2a prote<strong>in</strong> is localized<br />
<strong>in</strong> mitochondria and is separated from the cytosolic<br />
enzymes <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> glycolysis and alcoholic fermentation.<br />
This suggests that reduction of NAD + to NADH by rice<br />
ALDH2a does not <strong>in</strong>fluence the efficiency of glycolysis. Plants<br />
have many ALDH isozymes. We assume that at least two of<br />
these isozymes are <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> oxidiz<strong>in</strong>g acetaldehyde. One is<br />
a mitochondrial enzyme (Cui et al 1996, op den Camp and<br />
Kuhlemeier 1997) and another is a cytosolic enzyme (Li et al<br />
2000). In contrast to the expression of the mitochondrial Aldh2a<br />
gene, the expression of the rice cytosolic Aldh1a gene is probably<br />
not <strong>in</strong>fluenced by oxygen status (Li, Nakazono, and Hirai,<br />
unpublished data). Thus, it seems reasonable that the mitochondrial<br />
ALDH2a prote<strong>in</strong> is <strong>in</strong>duced to ensure the cont<strong>in</strong>uation<br />
of glycolysis, and that the cytosolic ALDH isozymes are<br />
not <strong>in</strong>duced for this purpose.<br />
References<br />
Cui X, Wise RP, Schnable PS. 1996. The rf2 nuclear restorer gene<br />
of male-sterile T-cytoplasm maize. Science 272:1334-1336.<br />
Hoss<strong>in</strong> MA, Huq E, Grover A, Dennis ES, Peacock WJ, Hodges<br />
TK. 1996. Characterization of pyruvate decarboxylase genes<br />
from rice. Plant Mol. Biol. 31:761-770.<br />
Li Y, Nakazono M, Tsutsumi N, Hirai A. 2000. Molecular and cellular<br />
characterizations of a cDNA clone encod<strong>in</strong>g a novel<br />
isozyme of aldehyde dehydrogenase from rice. Gene 249:67-<br />
74.<br />
op Den Camp RGL, Kuhlemeier C. 1997. Aldehyde dehydrogenase<br />
<strong>in</strong> tobacco pollen. Plant Mol. Biol. 35:355-365.<br />
Perata P, Alpi A. 1993. Plant responses to anaerobiosis. Plant Sci.<br />
93:1-17.<br />
Sachs MM, Subbaiah CC, Saab IN. 1996. Anaerobic gene expression<br />
and flood<strong>in</strong>g tolerance <strong>in</strong> maize. J. Exp. Bot. 47:1-15.<br />
Xie Y, Wu R. 1989. <strong>Rice</strong> alcohol dehydrogenase genes: anaerobic<br />
<strong>in</strong>duction, organ specific expression and characterization of<br />
cDNA clones. Plant Mol. Biol. 13:53-68.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ address: Laboratory of Plant Molecular <strong>Genetics</strong>, Graduate<br />
School of Agricultural and Life Sciences, The University<br />
of Tokyo, 1-1-1 Yayoi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8657, Japan.<br />
420 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
Identification of differentially expressed genes dur<strong>in</strong>g<br />
disease resistance response from rice by cDNA arrays<br />
B<strong>in</strong> Zhou, Kaiman Peng, Zhaohui Chu, Ship<strong>in</strong>g Wang, and Qifa Zhang<br />
A normalized cDNA library was constructed with 14 different tissues from rice variety M<strong>in</strong>ghui 63, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g tissues after<br />
<strong>in</strong>oculation with the pathogens Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae (Xoo) and Pyricularia grisea. This library conta<strong>in</strong>s about 62,000<br />
clones with an average <strong>in</strong>sert length of 1.2 kb. Approximately 20,000 clones from the library were arrayed on nylon film. Total<br />
RNA samples, isolated from different bacterial blight or blast resistance varieties and near-isogenic l<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong>duced with different<br />
stra<strong>in</strong>s or isolates of Xoo or P. grisea, respectively, were used as probes to screen the cDNA arrays for identification of defenserelated<br />
genes. Some 110 differentially expressed sequences were identified. The expression of 56 of these sequences <strong>in</strong>creased<br />
and 54 decreased or was <strong>in</strong>hibited after <strong>in</strong>oculation with Xoo or P. grisea. Sequence analysis of the 56 sequences<br />
show<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>creased expression after pathogen <strong>in</strong>duction reveals that about two-thirds of these sequences match with known<br />
functional prote<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong> the databases, which can be classified <strong>in</strong>to several groups accord<strong>in</strong>g to the putative functions. The cDNA<br />
array technique can provide an efficient tool for identify<strong>in</strong>g defense-related genes.<br />
Resistance <strong>in</strong> plants to an <strong>in</strong>compatible pathogen is manifested<br />
as two biochemical and physical responses, the hypersensitive<br />
reaction (HR) and systemic acquired resistance (SAR). Many<br />
gene products are <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> the processes of HR and SAR.<br />
Great efforts have been made <strong>in</strong> the studies of disease resistance<br />
(R) and SAR-responsive genes, especially those encod<strong>in</strong>g<br />
pathogenesis-related (PR) prote<strong>in</strong>s. However, much still<br />
rema<strong>in</strong>s to be learned concern<strong>in</strong>g the regulation of HR and<br />
SAR, as well as the signal<strong>in</strong>g pathway between HR and SAR.<br />
The cDNA array technique, by allow<strong>in</strong>g for large-scale display<strong>in</strong>g<br />
of gene expression, provides a powerful tool for study<strong>in</strong>g<br />
the genes <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> defense response at the whole-genome<br />
level. Our study aimed to identify disease resistance–<br />
related genes to characterize the pathways of the response to<br />
important diseases <strong>in</strong> rice.<br />
Materials and methods<br />
A normalized rice cDNA library from rice variety M<strong>in</strong>ghui 63<br />
was used to prepare the cDNA arrays. This cDNA library was<br />
constructed us<strong>in</strong>g 14 different tissues, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g callus, seedl<strong>in</strong>gs<br />
(etiolated, three-leaf stage, and five-leaf stage), culm<br />
(tiller<strong>in</strong>g stage and flower<strong>in</strong>g stage), root, flag leaf, panicle<br />
(flower<strong>in</strong>g stage and two different stages of gra<strong>in</strong>-fill<strong>in</strong>g),<br />
flower, leaves after <strong>in</strong>oculation with Xanthomonas oryzae pv.<br />
oryzae (Xoo), and leaves after <strong>in</strong>oculation with Pyricularia<br />
grisea. A total of about 62,000 clones with an average <strong>in</strong>sert<br />
length of 1.2 kb were collected and stored. Plasmids from<br />
20,000 clones were extracted and arrayed onto Hybond-N +<br />
nylon filters us<strong>in</strong>g a Biomek 2000 laboratory automation workstation<br />
(Beckman, Fullerton, CA). The filter, 8 × 12 cm <strong>in</strong> size,<br />
was arrayed <strong>in</strong>to 384 grids each conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g 8 dots of plasmid<br />
DNA, with each clone spotted twice <strong>in</strong> symmetric positions<br />
with<strong>in</strong> the grid.<br />
<strong>Rice</strong> varieties and near-isogenic l<strong>in</strong>es (NILs)—<br />
C101A51, M<strong>in</strong>ghui 63, IRBB10, and IRBB13—conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />
various disease resistance genes were <strong>in</strong>oculated with <strong>in</strong>compatible<br />
pathogens. C101A51, conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g blast resistance gene<br />
Pi2, and M<strong>in</strong>ghui 63, conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g at least one unidentified blast<br />
resistance gene (unpublished data), were <strong>in</strong>oculated with Philipp<strong>in</strong>e<br />
isolate V86013 of P. grisea. The NILs IRBB10 and<br />
IRBB13 conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g bacterial blight resistance genes Xa10 and<br />
xa13, respectively, were <strong>in</strong>oculated at the four-leaf stage with<br />
PXO86 (Philipp<strong>in</strong>e race 2) and PXO99 (Philipp<strong>in</strong>e race 6) of<br />
Xoo, respectively. The control plants were treated under the<br />
same conditions except that the pathogen suspension was replaced<br />
by water for both bacterial blight and blast <strong>in</strong>oculations.<br />
Total RNA was isolated from rice leaves harvested five<br />
days after pathogen <strong>in</strong>oculation. The first-strand cDNA was<br />
synthesized as the hybridization probe. The reverse transcription<br />
reaction was performed <strong>in</strong> a 50-µL volume conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g 50–<br />
100 µg total RNA, 1 µg oligo (dT) 15 primer, 400 U Superscripts<br />
II reverse transcriptase (GIBCO-BRL), 1X first-strand<br />
buffer, 100 µM each of dATP, dGTP, and dTTP, 50 µCi 32 P-<br />
dCTP, and 0.5 µM DTT. After <strong>in</strong>cubation at 37 °C for 1 h, the<br />
reaction was stopped and the RNA was degraded with 5 µL of<br />
0.5 N NaOH and 5 µL of 100 mM EDTA for 10 m<strong>in</strong> at 70 °C.<br />
The probe was purified us<strong>in</strong>g a Sephadex G-50 column.<br />
Filters were prehybridized for 3 to 6 h at 65 °C <strong>in</strong> a<br />
plastic bag conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g 15 mL of hybridization buffer. The filters<br />
were hybridized overnight <strong>in</strong> the same hybridization buffer<br />
conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the probe. After hybridization, the filters were<br />
washed 1 to 2 times <strong>in</strong> 0.5X SSC and 0.1% SDS for 15 m<strong>in</strong> at<br />
65 °C. Autoradiograph was subsequently carried out us<strong>in</strong>g<br />
PhosphorImager SI (Molecular Dynamics, Sunnyvale, CA).<br />
Results and discussion<br />
Hybridization of the filters with the probes prepared from the<br />
pathogen <strong>in</strong>oculated and mock-<strong>in</strong>oculated control tissues revealed<br />
a large number of differentially expressed sequences.<br />
Expression after pathogen <strong>in</strong>oculation <strong>in</strong>creased for some of<br />
the genes, and decreased or was totally <strong>in</strong>hibited for others.<br />
Gene isolation and function 421
A<br />
Table 1. The classification of genes whose expression <strong>in</strong>creased<br />
after pathogen <strong>in</strong>oculation.<br />
Putative gene group<br />
Number of genes<br />
B<br />
Fig. 1. The autoradiograph of cDNA arrays. The pair<br />
of cDNA arrays conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the same cDNA clones<br />
was hybridized with cDNA probes prepared from<br />
M<strong>in</strong>ghui 63 5 days after mock-<strong>in</strong>oculation (A) and<br />
pathogen <strong>in</strong>oculation (B), respectively. The arrows<br />
numbered 1 to 4 <strong>in</strong>dicate the sequences show<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>in</strong>creased expression after pathogen <strong>in</strong>oculation<br />
and arrow number 5 <strong>in</strong>dicates the sequence exhibit<strong>in</strong>g<br />
decreased expression after pathogen <strong>in</strong>oculation.<br />
The amount of differential expression varied from one sequence<br />
to another (Fig. 1), <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g different levels of response to<br />
pathogen <strong>in</strong>duction.<br />
The differential expression of a small portion of genes<br />
was not pathogen-specific; their expression was enhanced or<br />
reduced <strong>in</strong> tissues <strong>in</strong>oculated with both pathogens. In contrast,<br />
the differential expression displayed by most of the sequences<br />
was pathogen-specific, and was differentially expressed after<br />
<strong>in</strong>duction by only one pathogen or the other.<br />
Sequence comparison and BLAST search (Altschul et<br />
al 1997) were conducted to analyze the differentially expressed<br />
genes. A total of 110 unique sequences were identified; 56 of<br />
the sequences showed <strong>in</strong>creased expression and the rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />
54 showed decreased or <strong>in</strong>hibited expression after pathogen<br />
<strong>in</strong>oculation.<br />
Of the sequences show<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>creased expression after<br />
pathogen <strong>in</strong>duction, 53 had various degrees of similarity with<br />
genes <strong>in</strong> the databases and the other 3 showed no sequence<br />
homology with any of the genes or sequences <strong>in</strong> the databases<br />
(Table 1). The sequences can be grouped accord<strong>in</strong>g to the putative<br />
functions of their encoded prote<strong>in</strong>s. The three sequences<br />
<strong>in</strong> the transcription regulation group all encode putative DNAb<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g<br />
prote<strong>in</strong>s, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g WRKY-type DNA-b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g prote<strong>in</strong>.<br />
The results suggest that the WRKY-like gene may also<br />
Transcription regulation 3<br />
Translation regulation 4<br />
Transport prote<strong>in</strong>s 2<br />
K<strong>in</strong>ase 2<br />
Metabolic enzyme 9<br />
Other function 17<br />
Unknown function 16<br />
No significant similarity found <strong>in</strong> databases 3<br />
regulate the expression of PR genes <strong>in</strong> rice dur<strong>in</strong>g defense response.<br />
Two candidate k<strong>in</strong>ase sequences were identified to be<br />
responsive to pathogen <strong>in</strong>duction <strong>in</strong> our study. It is known that<br />
k<strong>in</strong>ases participate <strong>in</strong> many signal transduction pathways, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g<br />
the pathways <strong>in</strong> defense response. One sequence <strong>in</strong><br />
the “other function” group of Table 1 encodes a putative<br />
proteasome component. Similar results were reported <strong>in</strong> tobacco,<br />
<strong>in</strong> which the expression of a subunit of proteasome can<br />
be <strong>in</strong>duced by salicylic acid, known to be one of the signal<br />
molecules for SAR (Etienne et al 2000).<br />
Although 56 genes with <strong>in</strong>creased expression by pathogen<br />
<strong>in</strong>duction were identified, none of them had homology<br />
with the <strong>in</strong>tensively studied PR genes <strong>in</strong> the literature, such as<br />
those encod<strong>in</strong>g beta-1,3-glucanase, chit<strong>in</strong>ase, or peroxidase<br />
(Loon et al 1994). This may be partly because only a portion<br />
of the cDNA library was screened, and/or the expression of<br />
those PR genes is elicitor-specific (Smith and Metraux 1991).<br />
In summary, rice disease resistance response is a complex<br />
process <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g many components of various functions.<br />
The cDNA array technique can provide an efficient tool for<br />
identify<strong>in</strong>g defense-related genes.<br />
References<br />
Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schaffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W,<br />
Lipman DJ. 1997. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new<br />
generation of prote<strong>in</strong> database search programs. Nucl. Acids<br />
Res. 25:3389-3402.<br />
Etienne P, Petitot AS, Houot V, Ble<strong>in</strong> JP, Suty L. 2000. Induction of<br />
tcI 7, a gene encod<strong>in</strong>g a beta-subunit of proteasome, <strong>in</strong> tobacco<br />
plants treated with elicit<strong>in</strong>s, salicylic acid or hydrogen<br />
peroxide. FEBS Lett. 466:213-218.<br />
Loon LC van, Pierpo<strong>in</strong>t WS, Boller TH, Conejero V. 1994. Recommendations<br />
for nam<strong>in</strong>g plant pathogenesis-related prote<strong>in</strong>s.<br />
Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 12:245-264.<br />
Smith JA, Metraux J-P. 1991. Pseudomonas syr<strong>in</strong>gae pv. syr<strong>in</strong>gae<br />
<strong>in</strong>duces systemic resistance to Pyricularia oryzae <strong>in</strong> rice.<br />
Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 39:451-461.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ address: National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement,<br />
Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan<br />
430070, Ch<strong>in</strong>a.<br />
422 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
<strong>Rice</strong> transcript RIM2 accumulates <strong>in</strong> response to<br />
Magnaporthe grisea and its predicted prote<strong>in</strong> shares<br />
similarity with prote<strong>in</strong>s encoded by CACTA transposons<br />
J.X. Dong, H.T. Dong, Z.H. He, and D.B. Li<br />
<strong>Rice</strong> gene RIM2 was identified by mRNA differential analysis. The mRNA is strongly <strong>in</strong>duced <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>compatible <strong>in</strong>teractions<br />
between rice and Magnaporthe grisea. RIM2 is also <strong>in</strong>duced by a cell-wall elicitor derived from M. grisea, but not by wound<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
A 3.3-kb cDNA clone was identified and is predicted to encode a prote<strong>in</strong> of 653 am<strong>in</strong>o acids, which shares 32% to 53%<br />
identities with prote<strong>in</strong>s encoded by the CACTA transposons of other plants. An AT-rich region was found <strong>in</strong> the 5′ and 3′<br />
noncod<strong>in</strong>g term<strong>in</strong>i of RIM2. RIM2 shares 82% sequence identity with sequences flank<strong>in</strong>g Xa21 gene family members, such as<br />
A1 and C of the disease-resistance genes. Four direct repeats were identified <strong>in</strong> the 3′ noncod<strong>in</strong>g term<strong>in</strong>us. Southern hybridization<br />
with genomic DNA from different rice species <strong>in</strong>dicated that RIM2 is present <strong>in</strong> multiple copies. Results suggested that<br />
RIM2 transcription accumulation might be an early rice response to pathogen attack.<br />
Plants have developed genetic systems for respond<strong>in</strong>g to environmental<br />
stresses. It is known that some plant transposable<br />
elements (TEs) are activated <strong>in</strong> response to a chang<strong>in</strong>g environment<br />
(Wessler 1996). Interest<strong>in</strong>gly, some transposons are<br />
<strong>in</strong>duced by pathogen challenge (Vernhettes et al 1997).<br />
We are <strong>in</strong>terested <strong>in</strong> the rice defense response to pathogen<br />
challenge. <strong>Rice</strong> blast caused by Magnaporthe grisea is<br />
one of the most destructive diseases <strong>in</strong> rice. Several rice genes<br />
with defense aga<strong>in</strong>st M. grisea have been isolated, such as the<br />
phenylalan<strong>in</strong>e ammonia-lyase (PAL) gene, chit<strong>in</strong>ase gene, and<br />
3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase (HMGR)<br />
gene. Some cloned rice genes are strongly <strong>in</strong>duced by M. grisea<br />
(Dong et al 1997) or by the elicitor from the cell wall of M.<br />
grisea (Xu et al 1996). However, no study shows that rice<br />
transposons are <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> response to pathogen attack.<br />
Here we describe a rice gene, RIM2, that is <strong>in</strong>duced by<br />
M. grisea and a cell-wall elicitor of M. grisea. The predicted<br />
RIM2 prote<strong>in</strong> is 42% identical to TNP2 encoded by the Antirrh<strong>in</strong>um<br />
majus transposon Tam1 and 32% identical to TNPD<br />
encoded by the maize transposon En/Spm. Both Tam1 and En/<br />
Spm are called CACTA-elements because of the conserved<br />
sequence CACTA present <strong>in</strong> the term<strong>in</strong>al <strong>in</strong>verted repeats<br />
(TIRs). RIM2 shows an 82% sequence identity to the flank<strong>in</strong>g<br />
DNA sequences of Xa21 gene family members.<br />
Results<br />
Identification and clon<strong>in</strong>g of the full-length<br />
RIM2 cDNA<br />
Through mRNA differential display PCR (DD-PCR) us<strong>in</strong>g<br />
RNA from the near-isogenic l<strong>in</strong>es (NILs) H7R and H7S with<br />
or without the resistance gene Pi-r1(t) (He and Shen 1990)<br />
<strong>in</strong>oculated with the blast isolate ZB15, a 0.8-kb DD-PCR fragment<br />
(RIM19-8) was identified to be <strong>in</strong>duced <strong>in</strong> both <strong>in</strong>compatible<br />
and compatible <strong>in</strong>teractions of rice and M. grisea. Us<strong>in</strong>g<br />
the 0.8-kb RIM19-8 cDNA as a probe, a 3.3-kb cDNA<br />
clone was isolated from 5 × 10 5 clones of the rice cDNA library.<br />
The 3.3-kb cDNA consists of an open read<strong>in</strong>g frame<br />
(ORF) of 1,959 bp and a long AT-rich noncod<strong>in</strong>g 3′ tail. One<br />
104-bp sequence was found directly repeated four times (the<br />
repeat 1–4) <strong>in</strong> the 3′ noncod<strong>in</strong>g region with<strong>in</strong> the residues from<br />
2,765 to 3,152. Among the four repeats, repeats 1 and 2 were<br />
almost identical. Repeats 3 and 4 had some nucleotide changes<br />
compared with repeats 1 and 2. The short sequence<br />
AATTTTTATTAATTTTAA of repeats 3 and 4 was derived<br />
from the sequence AATTTTTAAAAGTA(GT)AA <strong>in</strong> repeats<br />
1 and 2 by replac<strong>in</strong>g AAAGTA(GT) with TTAATT. Repeat 4<br />
was truncated by a 35-bp deletion <strong>in</strong> the 3′-term<strong>in</strong>us (GenBank<br />
accession number for RIM2 is AF121139 and PGR99-042).<br />
RIM2 transcript accumulates by M. grisea attack<br />
Northern blott<strong>in</strong>g showed that the RIM2 transcript accumulated<br />
<strong>in</strong> both <strong>in</strong>compatible and compatible <strong>in</strong>teractions from 8<br />
h to at least 36 h after <strong>in</strong>oculation (Fig. 1A). Mock <strong>in</strong>oculation<br />
slightly <strong>in</strong>duced RIM2 transcript accumulation (Fig. 1B). No<br />
difference <strong>in</strong> transcript accumulation was observed between<br />
the <strong>in</strong>compatible and compatible <strong>in</strong>teractions, <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g that<br />
RIM2 <strong>in</strong>duction is not a resistance gene–related response to<br />
M. grisea attack. A polysaccharide fraction from the cell wall<br />
of M. grisea is known to <strong>in</strong>duce rice defense gene expression<br />
(Xu et al 1996); it also <strong>in</strong>duced RIM2 expression <strong>in</strong> cell suspensions<br />
with<strong>in</strong> 1–2 h after elicitor treatment. However, wound<strong>in</strong>g<br />
obviously did not <strong>in</strong>duce RIM2 expression. Results <strong>in</strong>dicated<br />
that RIM2 is specifically <strong>in</strong>ducible by M. grisea. All<br />
Northern blots revealed two transcripts that are about 4 kb and<br />
3.3 kb, respectively.<br />
RIM2 shares 32–55% identity<br />
with CACTA-transposons prote<strong>in</strong><br />
An ORF of 1,959 bp was found <strong>in</strong> RIM2 cDNA, which encodes<br />
a predicted prote<strong>in</strong> with 653 am<strong>in</strong>o acids. A database<br />
search showed that this RIM2 prote<strong>in</strong> shares 32–55% identity<br />
with prote<strong>in</strong>s encoded by CACTA-like elements. The sequence<br />
similarity among these prote<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong>dicates that the structural<br />
Gene isolation and function 423
H7R/isolate ZB15<br />
(<strong>in</strong>compatible)<br />
H7S/isolate ZB15<br />
(compatible)<br />
0 4 8 12 24 36 0 4 8 12 24 36 (h)<br />
kb<br />
RIM2<br />
A<br />
4.0<br />
3.3<br />
rDNA<br />
B<br />
RIM2<br />
rDNA<br />
4.0<br />
3.3<br />
Fig. 1. Transcript accumulation of<br />
RIM2 <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>compatible and compatible<br />
<strong>in</strong>teractions between the rice<br />
near-isogenic l<strong>in</strong>es H7R and H7S<br />
and the M. grisea isolate ZB15. (A)<br />
Northern blot show<strong>in</strong>g RIM2 transcript<br />
accumulation dur<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
time course from 0 to 36 h after<br />
<strong>in</strong>oculation with isolate ZB15. (B)<br />
Northern blot for mock <strong>in</strong>oculation<br />
controls.<br />
organizations of CACTA elements are strik<strong>in</strong>gly similar <strong>in</strong><br />
plants.<br />
RIM2 shares 82% identity with flank<strong>in</strong>g<br />
regions of Xa21<br />
A DNA database search revealed that a 1-kb RIM2 sequence<br />
from –631 to +427 shares 82% identity with the 5′-flank<strong>in</strong>g<br />
region of member A1 and 5′-and 3′-flank<strong>in</strong>g regions of member<br />
C of the rice disease resistance gene Xa21 family (Song et<br />
al 1997). The results support and add to the observation that<br />
the Xa21 family is a transposon-rich locus (Song et al 1998).<br />
We also found <strong>in</strong> the GenBank of NCBI that a rice partial cDNA<br />
clone, SR4, with 321 bp is identical to the sequence from 1,925<br />
to 2,224 of RIM2 except for its poly(A) tail (GenBank Accession<br />
No. U16784). SR4 is a sucrose-regulated gene <strong>in</strong> rice cell<br />
culture revealed also by DD-PCR. It is not clear whether RIM2<br />
and SR4 are the same gene because SR4 has an earlier poly(A)<br />
tail.<br />
RIM2 copy number <strong>in</strong> the rice genome<br />
Southern blott<strong>in</strong>g revealed four hybridiz<strong>in</strong>g fragments of rice<br />
genomic DNA digested by EcoRI, <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g that a family of<br />
RIM2 elements exists <strong>in</strong> the rice genome of all test l<strong>in</strong>es. No<br />
DNA restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) was<br />
identified, suggest<strong>in</strong>g that the RIM2 element might not be mobile.<br />
Discussion<br />
The CACTA elements are usually large, up to 15.2 kb, encode<br />
two prote<strong>in</strong>s thought to play a role <strong>in</strong> transposition, and carry<br />
conserved TIRs with the consensus sequence CACTA. Another<br />
CACTA element, Tnr3, is also found <strong>in</strong> rice that carries<br />
some characteristics of the En/Spm family (Motohashi et al<br />
1996). Clon<strong>in</strong>g the RIM2 full-length DNA will reveal more<br />
<strong>in</strong>formation on its structure and allow us to know whether the<br />
CACTA motif exists <strong>in</strong> the 5′ and 3′ TIRs.<br />
Transposons <strong>in</strong> flank<strong>in</strong>g regions of normal plant genes<br />
affect gene structure and expression. RIM2 sequences are found<br />
<strong>in</strong> flank<strong>in</strong>g regions of member A1 and C of the Xa21 gene<br />
family. In addition, 17 other elements have been found at the<br />
Xa21 locus (Song et al 1998). Furthermore, the Xa21-l<strong>in</strong>ked<br />
marker pTA818 carry<strong>in</strong>g a CACTA-like element may have transposed<br />
from an unl<strong>in</strong>ked chromosome to the Xa21 locus on<br />
chromosome 11, result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the sequence duplication <strong>in</strong> the<br />
wild species Oryza longistam<strong>in</strong>ata. These results support the<br />
idea that TEs play an important role <strong>in</strong> the evolution of resistance-gene<br />
loci.<br />
Transcription and transposition of TEs are commonly<br />
activated by several environmental stresses (Wessler 1996).<br />
The RIM2 transcript strongly accumulates <strong>in</strong> plants <strong>in</strong>oculated<br />
with M. grisea and <strong>in</strong> cells treated with a fungal elicitor, but<br />
not by wound<strong>in</strong>g. As with the tobacco transposon Tnt1, transcript<br />
accumulates <strong>in</strong> response to several microbial elicitors<br />
from fungus and bacterium, which have a common ability to<br />
424 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
<strong>in</strong>itiate a hypersensitive response <strong>in</strong> tobacco and <strong>in</strong> abiotic factors<br />
such as Na salicylate and CuCl 2 .<br />
RIM2 transcript accumulation is triggered by M. grisea<br />
<strong>in</strong>oculation and may reflect an early response to pathogen attack<br />
like the tobacco Tnt1 (Vernhettes et al 1997). It will be<br />
<strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>in</strong>vestigate whether RIM2 can be activated to<br />
transpose dur<strong>in</strong>g long-term tissue culture and dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>duction.<br />
References<br />
Dong HT, He ZH, Wu YL, Cheng SJ, Dong JX, Li DB. 1997.<br />
GenBank Accession Number: U83834, U83835.<br />
He ZH, Shen ZT. 1990. Near-isogenic pairs of <strong>in</strong>dica rice with blast<br />
(B1) resistance genes. Int. <strong>Rice</strong> Res. Newsl. 15:7.<br />
Motohashi R, Ohtsubo E, Ohtsubo E. 1996. Identification of Tnr3,<br />
a suppressor-mutator/enhancer-like transposable element from<br />
rice. Mol. Gen. Genet. 250:148-152.<br />
Song WY, Pi LY, Bureau TE, Ronald PC. 1998. Identification and<br />
characterization of 14 transposon-like elements <strong>in</strong> the<br />
noncod<strong>in</strong>g regions of members of the Xa21 family of disease<br />
resistance genes <strong>in</strong> rice. Mol. Gen. Genet. 258:449-456.<br />
Song WY, Pi LY, Wang GL, Gardner J, Holsten T, Ronald PC. 1997.<br />
Evolution of the rice Xa21 disease resistance gene family. Plant<br />
Cell 9:1279-1287.<br />
Vernhettes S, Grandbastien MA, Casacuberta JM. 1997. In vivo characterization<br />
of transcriptional regulatory sequences <strong>in</strong>volved<br />
<strong>in</strong> the defense-associated expression of the tobacco<br />
retrotransposon Tnt1. Plant Mol. Biol. 35:673-679.<br />
Wessler SR.1996. Plant retrotransposons: turned on by stress. Curr.<br />
Biol. 6:956-961.<br />
Xu Y, Zhu Q, Panbangred W, Shirasu K, Lamb C. 1996. Regulation,<br />
expression and function of a new basic chit<strong>in</strong>ase gene <strong>in</strong> rice<br />
(Oryza sativa L.). Plant Mol. Biol. 30:387-401.<br />
Notes<br />
Chimeric receptor k<strong>in</strong>ases for plant disease<br />
resistance eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> rice<br />
Zuhua He, Zhiyong Wang, Qun Zhu, Jianm<strong>in</strong>g Li, C. Lamb, J. Chory, and P. Ronald<br />
Authors’ address: Biotechnology Institute, Zhejiang University,<br />
Huajiachi, Hangzhou 310029, Ch<strong>in</strong>a. E-mail:<br />
lidb@mail.hz.zj.cn.<br />
Incompatible <strong>in</strong>teractions between plants and pathogens are characterized by defense responses such as the oxidative burst,<br />
hypersensitive cell death, and defense-gene activation. These <strong>in</strong>teractions are often “gene-for-gene” specific. Develop<strong>in</strong>g a<br />
nonspecific disease resistance strategy is important. We designed chimeric receptors that comb<strong>in</strong>ed the <strong>in</strong>tracellular doma<strong>in</strong><br />
of the rice receptor k<strong>in</strong>ase Xa21 conferr<strong>in</strong>g bacterial blight resistance with the extracellular ligand-b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g doma<strong>in</strong>s from other<br />
prote<strong>in</strong>s. Cell death and an oxidative burst were observed <strong>in</strong> cell l<strong>in</strong>es express<strong>in</strong>g the Xa21 gene when <strong>in</strong>oculated with an<br />
avirulent stra<strong>in</strong> of Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae (Xoo) but not with a virulent stra<strong>in</strong> or <strong>in</strong> the wild-type cell l<strong>in</strong>e. Transcription<br />
of two defense-related genes, RCH10 and PAL, was <strong>in</strong>duced, whereas OsCatB was down-regulated <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>compatible <strong>in</strong>teraction.<br />
One of the chimeric receptors, NRG1 (novel receptor gene), which consisted of the extracellular and transmembrane<br />
doma<strong>in</strong>s of the Arabidopsis brass<strong>in</strong>osteroid receptor (BRI1) and the XA21 k<strong>in</strong>ase doma<strong>in</strong>, was constitutively expressed <strong>in</strong> rice<br />
cell l<strong>in</strong>es. These cell l<strong>in</strong>es displayed cell death, RCH10 and PAL activation, and OsCatB suppression when treated with the<br />
ligand brass<strong>in</strong>olide (BL), as compared with wild-type and mutant controls. Another chimeric receptor-like k<strong>in</strong>ase, NRG6, which<br />
comb<strong>in</strong>ed the extracellular chit<strong>in</strong>-b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g (Heve<strong>in</strong>) doma<strong>in</strong> of rice chit<strong>in</strong>ase with the XA21 transmembrane and k<strong>in</strong>ase doma<strong>in</strong>s,<br />
also showed cell death, an oxidative burst, and defense-related gene activation/suppression <strong>in</strong> constitutive-expression cell<br />
l<strong>in</strong>es after treatment with chit<strong>in</strong>. The NRG1 and NRG6 plants exhibited dwarfism and partial disease resistance to Xoo. Our work<br />
provides a new approach for the design of novel signal<strong>in</strong>g genes controll<strong>in</strong>g plant disease resistance and development, and for<br />
the discovery of ligands for leuc<strong>in</strong>e-rich-repeat receptor k<strong>in</strong>ases.<br />
Plant disease resistance occurs when a plant carry<strong>in</strong>g a resistance<br />
(R) gene is attacked by a pathogen carry<strong>in</strong>g a correspond<strong>in</strong>g<br />
avirulence (Avr) gene. This <strong>in</strong>compatible <strong>in</strong>teraction leads<br />
to the hypersensitive response (HR) characterized by cell death<br />
at <strong>in</strong>fected sites. Other resistance responses <strong>in</strong>clude an oxidative<br />
burst, activation of defense-related genes, cell wall re<strong>in</strong>forcement,<br />
and the production of phytoalex<strong>in</strong>s. It has been proposed<br />
that R (defense-related) prote<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong>teract with correspond<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Avr (avirulence) prote<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong> a ligand-receptor mechanism<br />
that triggers cell death and disease responses. In support<br />
of this hypothesis, direct physical <strong>in</strong>teraction between the tomato<br />
R prote<strong>in</strong> PTO and the Avr prote<strong>in</strong> AvrPTO has been<br />
observed. Cell death and defense responses are triggered follow<strong>in</strong>g<br />
many R and Avr prote<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>teractions. Most cloned R<br />
genes confer race-specific resistance, limit<strong>in</strong>g their application<br />
for plant disease control. The development of a nonspecific<br />
disease resistance strategy is therefore of scientific and<br />
agronomic <strong>in</strong>terest.<br />
Gene isolation and function 425
LRR TM JM K<strong>in</strong>ase<br />
XA21<br />
LRR TM JM K<strong>in</strong>ase<br />
BRI1<br />
Heve<strong>in</strong><br />
Catalytic doma<strong>in</strong><br />
RCH10<br />
Constructs<br />
35S<br />
LRR TM JM K<strong>in</strong>ase<br />
NOS-ter<br />
NRG-1<br />
35S<br />
35S<br />
35S<br />
35S<br />
LRR mutant<br />
G611E<br />
LRR TM JM<br />
TM JM K<strong>in</strong>ase<br />
K<strong>in</strong>ase mutant<br />
K737E<br />
Heve<strong>in</strong> TM JM K<strong>in</strong>ase<br />
Heve<strong>in</strong><br />
TM<br />
JM<br />
K<strong>in</strong>ase mutant<br />
K737E<br />
NOS-ter<br />
NOS-ter<br />
NOS-ter<br />
NOS-ter<br />
NRG1mL<br />
NRG1mK<br />
NRG6<br />
NRG6mK<br />
Fig. 1. Schematic diagram of chimeric<br />
receptor k<strong>in</strong>ases NRG1 and<br />
NRG6 and mutant controls. The<br />
XA21 and BRI1 or RCH10 prote<strong>in</strong>s<br />
are <strong>in</strong>dicated by gray and empty<br />
boxes, respectively. Chimeras<br />
NRG1, NRG1mL, and NRG1mK<br />
carry the BRI1 LRR, TM, and JM<br />
doma<strong>in</strong>s and the XA21 k<strong>in</strong>ase doma<strong>in</strong>.<br />
NRG6 and NRG6mK carry the<br />
RCH10 signal and Heve<strong>in</strong> doma<strong>in</strong>s<br />
and the XA21 TM and cytoplasmic<br />
k<strong>in</strong>ase doma<strong>in</strong>s. All chimeras are<br />
driven by the cauliflower mosaic<br />
virus 35S promoter <strong>in</strong> rice cells.<br />
We constructed chimeric receptor-like k<strong>in</strong>ases: NRG1<br />
(novel receptor gene 1), which consists of the leuc<strong>in</strong>e-rich repeat<br />
(LRR) and transmembrane (TM) doma<strong>in</strong>s of the<br />
Arabidopsis brass<strong>in</strong>osteroid receptor k<strong>in</strong>ase BRI1 and the<br />
XA21 k<strong>in</strong>ase doma<strong>in</strong> (He et al 2000); and NRG6, which consists<br />
of the Heve<strong>in</strong> doma<strong>in</strong> of rice chit<strong>in</strong>ase RCH10 (Zhu and<br />
Lamb 1994) and the XA21 doma<strong>in</strong> (Song et al 1995). The<br />
Heve<strong>in</strong> doma<strong>in</strong> is a high-aff<strong>in</strong>ity chit<strong>in</strong>-b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g doma<strong>in</strong> present<br />
<strong>in</strong> some chit<strong>in</strong>ases and other chit<strong>in</strong>-b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g prote<strong>in</strong>s. Treatment<br />
of the NRG1 cell l<strong>in</strong>es with the ligand brass<strong>in</strong>olide (BL)<br />
and the NRG6 cell l<strong>in</strong>es with the ligand chit<strong>in</strong> results <strong>in</strong> cell<br />
death and activation of defense-related genes.<br />
Results<br />
Construction and transgenic rice cell l<strong>in</strong>es<br />
of NRG1 and NRG6<br />
The novel receptor gene constructs NRG1 and NRG6 and their<br />
mutant controls are shown <strong>in</strong> Figure 1. NRG1 consists of the<br />
BRI1 LRR, TM, and juxtamembrane (JM) doma<strong>in</strong>s and the<br />
XA21 k<strong>in</strong>ase doma<strong>in</strong>, which encodes a prote<strong>in</strong> with 1,197<br />
am<strong>in</strong>o acids. NRG1mL and NRG1mK are identical to NRG1,<br />
except that NRG1mL carries a mutant <strong>in</strong> the BRIl LRR doma<strong>in</strong><br />
(b<strong>in</strong>-113, G611E) 19 and NRG1mK carries the XA21 k<strong>in</strong>ase<br />
doma<strong>in</strong> mutant (K737E) by <strong>in</strong> vitro mutagenesis. The<br />
XA21 (K737E) mutant was previously shown to lack k<strong>in</strong>ase<br />
activity <strong>in</strong> vitro (Song and Ronald, unpublished data). NRG6<br />
consists of the Heve<strong>in</strong> doma<strong>in</strong>-cod<strong>in</strong>g region, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
signal peptide of the rice chit<strong>in</strong>ase RCH10 and the cod<strong>in</strong>g region<br />
of the TM, JM, and k<strong>in</strong>ase doma<strong>in</strong>s of XA21, which encodes<br />
a prote<strong>in</strong> of 463 am<strong>in</strong>o acids. NRG6mK is identical to<br />
NRG6, except for the fact that the k<strong>in</strong>ase doma<strong>in</strong> carries a<br />
mutation <strong>in</strong> lys<strong>in</strong>e 737 (K737E). The japonica rice cultivar<br />
Taipei 309 was transformed with the chimeric constructs. Suspension<br />
cell l<strong>in</strong>es were established from transformants NRG1-<br />
30, NRG1-34 express<strong>in</strong>g NRG1, NRG1mL, NRG1mK, NRG6-<br />
39, NRG6-61 express<strong>in</strong>g NRG6, NRG6mK, and the<br />
nontransgenic Taipei 309 as described below. Northern blott<strong>in</strong>g<br />
and western blott<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dicated that the chimeric prote<strong>in</strong>s<br />
of NRG1, NRG1mL and NRG1mK, and NRG6 and NRG6mK<br />
could be expressed probably as membrane-bond prote<strong>in</strong>s (data<br />
not shown).<br />
Brass<strong>in</strong>olide and chit<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>duce cell death<br />
and oxidative burst <strong>in</strong> NRG1 and NRG6 cell l<strong>in</strong>es<br />
The NRG1 and NRG6 cell l<strong>in</strong>es undergo cell death <strong>in</strong> response<br />
to BL (2 µm) and chit<strong>in</strong> (200 ng mL –1 pentamer and hexamer),<br />
respectively. Evans blue sta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g showed that cell death was<br />
<strong>in</strong>duced <strong>in</strong> the two NRG1 <strong>in</strong>dependent cell l<strong>in</strong>es, NRG1-30<br />
and NRG1-34, after treatment for 24 h with BL (Fig. 2A), and<br />
<strong>in</strong> the two NRG6 cell l<strong>in</strong>es, NRG6-39 and NRG6-61, after<br />
treatment with chit<strong>in</strong> (Fig. 3A), compared with the controls,<br />
respectively. The observation that chit<strong>in</strong> is an <strong>in</strong>ducer of plant<br />
defense responses may account for the higher background cell<br />
death <strong>in</strong>duced by chit<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> the control cell l<strong>in</strong>es. Us<strong>in</strong>g a modified<br />
ferrous oxidation method, a detectable oxidative burst was<br />
observed <strong>in</strong> the NRG1 and NRG6 cell l<strong>in</strong>es 30 m<strong>in</strong> after BL<br />
and chit<strong>in</strong> treatment compared with control cell l<strong>in</strong>es (Figs.<br />
426 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
Dye-b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>crease (%) over control<br />
35<br />
A<br />
30<br />
25<br />
20<br />
H 2 O 2 levels (nM)<br />
2,500<br />
2,000<br />
B<br />
15<br />
10<br />
5<br />
0<br />
NRG1-30<br />
NRG1-34<br />
NRG1mL<br />
NRG1mK<br />
Taipei 309<br />
1,500<br />
1,000<br />
NRG1-30<br />
NRG1-34<br />
NRG1mL<br />
NRG1mK<br />
Taipei 309<br />
Fig. 2. Cell death and an oxidative burst<br />
<strong>in</strong>duced by brass<strong>in</strong>olide (BL) treatment<br />
of the NRG1 cell l<strong>in</strong>es. (A) Cells were<br />
sta<strong>in</strong>ed with Evans blue and washed with<br />
water to remove excessive dye. Cell<br />
death is observed as a dye-b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>crease<br />
<strong>in</strong> cell l<strong>in</strong>es treated with 2 µm<br />
BL for 24 h. (B) An oxidative burst is <strong>in</strong>duced<br />
<strong>in</strong> cell l<strong>in</strong>es treated with BL for<br />
30 m<strong>in</strong>. Control is shown <strong>in</strong> white column,<br />
treatment <strong>in</strong> solid column.<br />
Dye-b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>crease (%) over control<br />
80<br />
A<br />
70<br />
60<br />
50<br />
40<br />
30<br />
20<br />
10<br />
0<br />
NRG6-39<br />
NRG6-61<br />
NRG6mK<br />
Taipei 309<br />
H 2 O 2 levels (nM)<br />
2,000<br />
1,900<br />
1,800<br />
1,700<br />
1,600<br />
1,500<br />
1,400<br />
1,300<br />
1,200<br />
1,100<br />
1,000<br />
NRG6-39<br />
NRG6-61<br />
NRG6mK<br />
B<br />
Taipei 309<br />
Fig. 3. Cell death and an oxidative<br />
burst <strong>in</strong>duced by chit<strong>in</strong> treatment<br />
of the NRG6 cell l<strong>in</strong>es. (A) Cell<br />
death is observed <strong>in</strong> cell l<strong>in</strong>es<br />
treated with chit<strong>in</strong> (200 ng mL –1 )<br />
for 24 h. (B) An oxidative burst is<br />
<strong>in</strong>duced <strong>in</strong> cell l<strong>in</strong>es treated with<br />
chit<strong>in</strong> for 30 m<strong>in</strong>. Control is shown<br />
<strong>in</strong> white column, treatment <strong>in</strong> solid<br />
column.<br />
2B, 3B). Similarly, cell death and an oxidative burst were observed<br />
<strong>in</strong> the Xa21 cell l<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong>oculated with the <strong>in</strong>compatible<br />
Xoo race P6 20 . These results <strong>in</strong>dicate that BL and chit<strong>in</strong> can<br />
trigger cell death <strong>in</strong> the NRG1 and NRG6 cell l<strong>in</strong>es, respectively.<br />
Brass<strong>in</strong>olide and chit<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>duce/repress defenserelated<br />
genes <strong>in</strong> NRG1 and NRG6 cell l<strong>in</strong>es<br />
Activation of the XA21 signal leads to rapid and strong transcription<br />
of the rice defense-related genes, RCH10 and PAL<br />
(phenylalan<strong>in</strong>e ammonia-lyase), and a decrease <strong>in</strong> OsCatB<br />
(catalase B) transcription. In the NRG1 cells, BL could transcribe<br />
accumulation of RCH10 and PAL, with the peak (fiveto<br />
eightfold) occurr<strong>in</strong>g 4–8 h after BL treatment (Fig. 4). In<br />
contrast, neither NRG1mL and NRG1mK nor Taipei 309 cells<br />
showed an <strong>in</strong>duction of RCH10 and PAL. Similarly, we found<br />
that chit<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>duced a stronger transcription of RCH10 and PAL<br />
<strong>in</strong> the NRG6 cell l<strong>in</strong>es, with peak levels (12–16-fold) occurr<strong>in</strong>g<br />
2–8 h for PAL and 24 h for RCH10 after chit<strong>in</strong> treatment<br />
(Fig. 5). In contrast, the control cell l<strong>in</strong>es NRG6mK and Taipei<br />
309 showed reduced <strong>in</strong>duction (three- to fourfold) of RCH10<br />
and PAL by chit<strong>in</strong>. Similar to observations <strong>in</strong> XA21 cell l<strong>in</strong>es<br />
(He et al 2000), accumulation of OsCatB transcripts decreased<br />
<strong>in</strong> the NRG1 and NRG6 cell l<strong>in</strong>es after BL and chit<strong>in</strong> treatment,<br />
respectively, whereas the control cell l<strong>in</strong>es exhibited no<br />
change (Figs. 4, 5). Transcript levels of OsCatB <strong>in</strong>creased <strong>in</strong><br />
all cell l<strong>in</strong>es 24 h after chit<strong>in</strong> treatment (Fig. 5), suggest<strong>in</strong>g<br />
that the chit<strong>in</strong>-<strong>in</strong>duced defense response might <strong>in</strong>volve multiple<br />
pathways.<br />
The transgenic plants NRG1 and NRG6 (T 0 ) were dwarf<br />
and sterile, whereas the control plants showed no difference<br />
compared with the wild-type Taipei 309 (data not shown). We<br />
observed that the NRG1 plants treated with BL and NRG6<br />
plants nontreated exhibited partial disease resistance to Xoo<br />
<strong>in</strong> prelim<strong>in</strong>ary experiments (data not shown), although we could<br />
not conduct a detailed disease resistance assay because of the<br />
lack of T 1 plants. Brass<strong>in</strong>osteroids produced <strong>in</strong> plants could<br />
activate the NPR1 k<strong>in</strong>ase, lead<strong>in</strong>g to the constitutive activation<br />
of a plant defense response. Similarly, the observation<br />
that β-[1-4]-N-acetylglucosam<strong>in</strong>e (GlcNAc) residues, compo-<br />
Gene isolation and function 427
NRG1-30<br />
NRG1-34<br />
0 2 4 8 12 24 0 2 4 8 12 24 (h)<br />
RCH10<br />
PAL<br />
CatB<br />
rRNA<br />
NRG1mL NRG1mK Taipei 309<br />
0 2 4 8 12 24 0 2 4 8 12 24 0 2 4 8 12 24 (h)<br />
RCH10<br />
PAL<br />
CatB<br />
rRNA<br />
Fig. 4. Increase or decrease <strong>in</strong> rice defense-related gene transcripts after brass<strong>in</strong>olide (BL) treatment. Northern<br />
blott<strong>in</strong>g shows transcript accumulation of RCH10, PAL, and OsCatB <strong>in</strong> cell l<strong>in</strong>es treated with 2 µm BL over 0, 2, 4,<br />
8, 12, and 24 h.<br />
NRG6-39 NRG6-61 NRG6mK<br />
Taipei 309<br />
0 2 8 24 0 2 8 24 0 2 8 24 0 2 8 24 (h)<br />
RCH10<br />
PAL<br />
OsCatB<br />
rRNA<br />
Fig. 5. Increase or decrease <strong>in</strong> rice defense-related gene transcripts after chit<strong>in</strong> treatment. Northern blott<strong>in</strong>g<br />
shows transcript accumulation of RCH10, PAL, and OsCatB <strong>in</strong> cell l<strong>in</strong>es treated with chit<strong>in</strong> (200 ng mL –1 ) over 0,<br />
2, 8, and 24 h.<br />
nents of chit<strong>in</strong>, are abundant <strong>in</strong> plant cell walls may account<br />
for the phenotypes of the NRG6 plants. GlcNAc may serve as<br />
a ligand for the chimeric receptor and may activate constitutive<br />
defense responses.<br />
Discussion<br />
We have shown that two chimeric receptor-like k<strong>in</strong>ases can<br />
<strong>in</strong>itiate plant defense responses, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g cell death, an oxidative<br />
burst, and defense-related gene <strong>in</strong>duction or repression,<br />
<strong>in</strong> response to the chemical ligands BL and chit<strong>in</strong> treatment<br />
(Figs. 2–5). Transmembrane signal<strong>in</strong>g via ligand-<strong>in</strong>duced activation<br />
of receptor k<strong>in</strong>ases, characterized by dimerization and<br />
autophosphorylation of k<strong>in</strong>ases, plays an important role <strong>in</strong> signal<br />
transduction controll<strong>in</strong>g cell growth and disease (Hunter<br />
2000). Our results provide evidence that chimeric receptors<br />
may be good tools for <strong>in</strong>vestigat<strong>in</strong>g signal transduction <strong>in</strong> both<br />
plant cells and animal cells.<br />
BRI1 is a membrane-bond prote<strong>in</strong> (Friedrichsen et al<br />
2000), demonstrat<strong>in</strong>g that the chimeric NRG1 prote<strong>in</strong> is a receptor<br />
k<strong>in</strong>ase of membrane-localization as revealed by<br />
immunodetection (data not shown). Similarly, the RCH10 prote<strong>in</strong><br />
lacks a C-term<strong>in</strong>al vacuolar target<strong>in</strong>g signal and is thought<br />
to be an extracellular prote<strong>in</strong> (Nishizawa et al 1993). Our pre-<br />
428 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
lim<strong>in</strong>ary results also <strong>in</strong>dicate that the Heve<strong>in</strong>-XA21 prote<strong>in</strong><br />
co-purifies with the membrane fraction (data not shown). These<br />
results suggest that BL and chit<strong>in</strong> molecules can be perceived<br />
at the cell surface by the LRR doma<strong>in</strong> of BRI1 and the Heve<strong>in</strong><br />
doma<strong>in</strong> of RCH10 to <strong>in</strong>itiate <strong>in</strong>tracellular XA21 k<strong>in</strong>ase signal<strong>in</strong>g<br />
via dimerization and phosphorylation of the chimeric<br />
k<strong>in</strong>ase.<br />
We observed that the NRG1 and NRG6 plants exhibited<br />
partial disease resistance to Xoo (data not shown), suggest<strong>in</strong>g<br />
that chimeric receptors could be used to eng<strong>in</strong>eer broad-spectrum<br />
disease resistance. However, the NRG1 and NRG6 plants<br />
were dwarfed and sterile. It may be possible to manipulate<br />
healthy transgenic plants express<strong>in</strong>g NRG1 and NRG6 driven<br />
by a weaker or BL- and chit<strong>in</strong>-<strong>in</strong>ducible promoter, respectively.<br />
Our results <strong>in</strong>dicate that the Xa21 gene can be used as a foundation<br />
for design<strong>in</strong>g novel genes conferr<strong>in</strong>g broad-spectrum<br />
disease resistance <strong>in</strong> cereals. Several approaches may be possible:<br />
(1) The catalytic doma<strong>in</strong> of XA21 can be fused to known<br />
ligand-b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g doma<strong>in</strong>s such as NRG1 and NRG6 and the<br />
defense response is triggered by ligand treatment; (2) It could<br />
be possible to design disease resistance receptors with ligandb<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g<br />
doma<strong>in</strong>s recogniz<strong>in</strong>g virulence factors common to<br />
many plant pathogens; (3) Broader-spectrum resistance could<br />
be achieved by comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the Avr prote<strong>in</strong>-b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g doma<strong>in</strong>s of<br />
multiple R gene products and fus<strong>in</strong>g them to the XA21 catalytic<br />
doma<strong>in</strong>.<br />
He Z, Wang Z-Y, Li Z, Zhu Q, Lamb C, Ronald P, Chory J. 2000.<br />
Perception of brass<strong>in</strong>osteroids by the extracellular doma<strong>in</strong> of<br />
the receptor k<strong>in</strong>ase, BRI1. Science 288:2360-2363.<br />
Hunter T. 2000. Signal<strong>in</strong>g: 2000 and beyond. Cell 100:113-127.<br />
Nishizawa Y, Kishimoto N, Saito A, Hibi T. 1993. Sequence variation,<br />
differential expression and chromosomal location of rice<br />
chit<strong>in</strong>ase genes. Mol. Gen. Genet. 241:1-10.<br />
Song WY, Wang GL, Chen LL, Kim HS, Pi LY, Holsten T, Gardner<br />
J, Wang B, Zhai WX, Zhu LH, Fuquest C, Ronald P. 1995. A<br />
receptor k<strong>in</strong>ase-like prote<strong>in</strong> encoded by the rice disease resistance<br />
gene, Xa21. Science 270:1804-1806.<br />
Zhu Q, Lamb CJ. 1994. Isolation and characterization of a rice gene<br />
encod<strong>in</strong>g a basic chit<strong>in</strong>ase. Mol. Gen. Genet. 226:289-296.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ addresses: Zuhua He, Biotechnology Institute, Zhejiang<br />
University, Hangzhou 310029, Ch<strong>in</strong>a; Zuhua He and P.<br />
Ronald, Department of Plant Pathology, UC Davis, Davis, CA<br />
95616; Zuhua He, Zhiyong Wang, Qun Zhu, Jianm<strong>in</strong>g Li, C.<br />
Lamb, and J. Chory, Plant Biology Laboratory, The Salk Institute<br />
for Biological Studies, La Jolla, CA 92037; C. Lamb,<br />
John Innes Centre, Norwich, NR47UH, UK; J, Chory, The<br />
Howard Hughes Medical Institute, The Salk Institute for Biological<br />
Studies, La Jolla, CA 92037. Current address: Qun<br />
Zhu, Dupont Company, Wilm<strong>in</strong>gton, DE 19880-0402;<br />
Jianm<strong>in</strong>g Le, Department of Biology, University of Michigan,<br />
Ann Arbor, MI 48190-1048, USA.<br />
References<br />
Friedrichsen D, Joaziro C, Li J, Hunter T, Chory J. 2000.<br />
Brass<strong>in</strong>osteroid-<strong>in</strong>sensitive-1 is a ubiquitously expressed leuc<strong>in</strong>e-rich<br />
repeat receptor ser<strong>in</strong>e/threon<strong>in</strong>e k<strong>in</strong>ase. Plant Physiol.<br />
123:1247-1255.<br />
Jasmonic acid- and salicylic acid-mediated defense signal<br />
transduction <strong>in</strong> rice<br />
Y. Yang, M. Qi, M.-W. Lee, and L. Xiong<br />
A comb<strong>in</strong>ation of molecular, biochemical, and genomic approaches is be<strong>in</strong>g used to study jasmonic acid (JA)- and salicylic acid<br />
(SA)-mediated defense signal transduction <strong>in</strong> rice. By generat<strong>in</strong>g and analyz<strong>in</strong>g SA-deficient transgenic rice, we have demonstrated<br />
that SA acts as a preformed antioxidant to modulate redox balance and prevent rice plants from suffer<strong>in</strong>g from oxidative<br />
damage caused by ag<strong>in</strong>g and biotic and abiotic stresses. In contrast, JA appears to function as an important signal molecule<br />
<strong>in</strong> rice for <strong>in</strong>duc<strong>in</strong>g systemic acquired resistance aga<strong>in</strong>st pathogen <strong>in</strong>fection. To ga<strong>in</strong> further <strong>in</strong>sights <strong>in</strong>to SA- and JA-mediated<br />
defense signal transduction <strong>in</strong> rice, we isolated a large number of JA-, benzothiadiazole (BTH)-, and/or blast fungus-<strong>in</strong>duced<br />
immediate early (IE) genes, whose transcription is <strong>in</strong>dependent of de novo prote<strong>in</strong> synthesis. Sequence analysis shows that<br />
these IE genes encode putative prote<strong>in</strong> k<strong>in</strong>ases, transcription factors, and other potential signal<strong>in</strong>g components. A JA-<strong>in</strong>ducible<br />
IE gene that encodes a Myb transcription factor was found to be associated with blast <strong>in</strong>fection and lesion formation by<br />
promot<strong>in</strong>g host cell death. Further analysis of these IE genes will not only enhance our understand<strong>in</strong>g of defense signal<br />
transduction <strong>in</strong> rice, but also facilitate the development of novel strategies for disease control.<br />
Gene isolation and function 429
Endogenous secondary signals such as jasmonic acid (JA) and<br />
salicylic acid (SA) play an important role <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>duced resistance<br />
aga<strong>in</strong>st pathogen <strong>in</strong>fection and <strong>in</strong>sect herbivory. Salicylic<br />
acid is a key endogenous secondary signal <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong><br />
activat<strong>in</strong>g plant defense response. A synthetic analogue of SA<br />
such as benzothiadiazole (BTH) has been commercially used<br />
as an <strong>in</strong>ducer of systemic acquired resistance (SAR) for disease<br />
control <strong>in</strong> the field. Recently, jasmonic acid was also demonstrated<br />
to play an important role <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>duc<strong>in</strong>g disease resistance<br />
responses through a dist<strong>in</strong>ct, SA-<strong>in</strong>dependent signal<strong>in</strong>g<br />
pathway. Therefore, multiple endogenous molecules (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g<br />
SA, JA, and ethylene) are <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> the complex network<br />
of signal<strong>in</strong>g pathways that leads to local and systemic<br />
resistance. Furthermore, cross-talk between these defense signal<strong>in</strong>g<br />
pathways appears to be very common and important <strong>in</strong><br />
regulat<strong>in</strong>g plant defense responses.<br />
To date, the majority of the research <strong>in</strong> defense signal<strong>in</strong>g<br />
mechanisms has focused on dicot species such as<br />
Arabidopsis and tobacco, whereas <strong>in</strong> economically important<br />
cereal crops our understand<strong>in</strong>g of signal transduction lead<strong>in</strong>g<br />
to disease resistance is limited (Piffanelli et al 1999). Only a<br />
few signal<strong>in</strong>g components (e.g., small-GTP b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g prote<strong>in</strong>,<br />
MAP k<strong>in</strong>ase; Kawasaki et al 1999, Kim et al 1999) and a dozen<br />
defense genes (e.g., PR-1, PBZ1, β-glucanase, chit<strong>in</strong>ase, phenylalan<strong>in</strong>e<br />
ammonia lyase, HMG-CoA reductase) have been<br />
isolated from rice and implicated to be <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> host defense<br />
response. Therefore, efforts are required to identify novel<br />
signal<strong>in</strong>g components and to elucidate signal transduction<br />
mechanisms <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> rice defense responses.<br />
Role of SA and JA <strong>in</strong> rice defense signal<strong>in</strong>g<br />
In contrast to tobacco and Arabidopsis, both of which conta<strong>in</strong><br />
low basal levels of SA (0.01–0.1 µg g –1 fresh weight), rice has<br />
high levels of SA (5–20 µg g –1 fresh weight, Silverman et al<br />
1995). To elucidate the potential role of SA <strong>in</strong> rice disease<br />
resistance, SA-deficient transgenic rice Nipponbare was generated<br />
via Agrobacterium-mediated transformation by<br />
overexpress<strong>in</strong>g a bacterial salicylate hydroxylase gene (nahG)<br />
that degrades SA. HPLC analysis <strong>in</strong>dicates that these transgenic<br />
rice plants conta<strong>in</strong>
Kawasaki T, Henmi K, Ono E, Hatakeyama S, Iwano M, Satoh H,<br />
Shimamoto K. 1999. The small GTP-b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g prote<strong>in</strong> Rac is a<br />
regulator of cell death <strong>in</strong> plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA<br />
96:10922-10926.<br />
Kim WY, Kim CY, Cheong NE, Choi YO, Lee KO, Lee SH, Park<br />
JB, Nakano A, Bahk JD, Cho MJ, Lee SY. 1999. Characterization<br />
of two fungal-elicitor-<strong>in</strong>duced rice cDNAs encod<strong>in</strong>g<br />
functional homologues of the rab-specific GDP-dissociation<br />
<strong>in</strong>hibitor. Planta 210:143-149.<br />
Piffanelli P, Devoto A, Schulze-Lefert P. 1999. Defense signal<strong>in</strong>g<br />
pathways <strong>in</strong> cereals. Curr. Op<strong>in</strong>. Plant Biol. 2:295-300.<br />
Silverman P, Seskar M, Kanter D, Schweizer P, Metraux J-P, Rask<strong>in</strong><br />
I. 1995. Salicylic acid <strong>in</strong> rice: biosynthesis, conjugation and<br />
possible role. Plant Physiol. 108:633-639.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ address: Department of Plant Pathology, University of<br />
Arkansas, Fayetteville, Arkansas 72701, USA.<br />
Alternative splic<strong>in</strong>g bestows capacity for nuclear<br />
expression and mitochondrial target<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> rice<br />
K. Kadowaki and N. Kubo<br />
The gene content of the plant mitochondrial genome is much larger than that of animals, <strong>in</strong>sects, etc. A strik<strong>in</strong>g example exists<br />
<strong>in</strong> liverwort and Arabidopsis, <strong>in</strong> which 16 and 9 k<strong>in</strong>ds of ribosomal prote<strong>in</strong> genes have been identified, respectively, whereas<br />
none of these genes are encoded <strong>in</strong> mammals and yeast. The rice mitochondrial genome has a sequence homologous to that<br />
of the gene for ribosomal prote<strong>in</strong> S14 (rps14), but the cod<strong>in</strong>g sequence is <strong>in</strong>terrupted by <strong>in</strong>ternal stop codons. A functional<br />
rps14 gene was isolated from the rice nuclear genome, suggest<strong>in</strong>g a gene-transfer event from the mitochondrion to the<br />
nucleus. The nuclear rps14 gene encodes a long N-term<strong>in</strong>al extension show<strong>in</strong>g significant similarity to a part of mitochondrial<br />
succ<strong>in</strong>ate dehydrogenase subunit B (SDHB) prote<strong>in</strong> from humans. Isolation of a functional rice sdhB cDNA and subsequent<br />
sequence comparison to the nuclear rps14 <strong>in</strong>dicates that the 5′ portions of the two cDNAs are identical. The sdhB genomic<br />
sequence shows that the SDHB-cod<strong>in</strong>g region is divided <strong>in</strong>to two exons. Surpris<strong>in</strong>gly, the RPS14-cod<strong>in</strong>g region is located<br />
between the two exons. DNA gel blot analysis <strong>in</strong>dicates that both sdhB and rps14 are present at a s<strong>in</strong>gle locus <strong>in</strong> the rice<br />
nucleus. These f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs strongly suggest that the two gene transcripts result from a s<strong>in</strong>gle mRNA precursor by alternative<br />
splic<strong>in</strong>g. The migration of the mitochondrial rps14 sequence <strong>in</strong>to the already exist<strong>in</strong>g sdhB gene could bestow capacity for<br />
nuclear expression and mitochondrial target<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
The endosymbiont hypothesis for mitochondrial orig<strong>in</strong> has<br />
generally been accepted (Gray 1992). The gene content of the<br />
plant mitochondrial genome is much larger than that of animals,<br />
<strong>in</strong>sects, etc. (Brennicke et al 1993). A strik<strong>in</strong>g example<br />
exists <strong>in</strong> liverwort and Arabidopsis, <strong>in</strong> which 16 and 9 k<strong>in</strong>ds<br />
of ribosomal prote<strong>in</strong> genes have been identified, respectively,<br />
whereas none of these genes are encoded <strong>in</strong> mammals and yeast<br />
(Oda et al 1992, Unseld et al 1997). Several plant mitochondrial<br />
genomes have been shown to conta<strong>in</strong> pseudogenes, and<br />
the total gene content of the mitochondrial genome is not always<br />
the same among higher plant species, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g even<br />
evolutionarily related species. These observations suggest that<br />
gene-transfer events from the mitochondrion to the nucleus<br />
are carried out by an active process <strong>in</strong> plants (Brennicke et al<br />
1993). However, knowledge of gene transfer followed by a<br />
gene activation process is still very limited.<br />
We report a gene-transfer event and a process of acquisition<br />
for a target<strong>in</strong>g signal as well as a nuclear expression. An<br />
alternative splic<strong>in</strong>g event supplies the same target<strong>in</strong>g signal to<br />
different prote<strong>in</strong>s and activates a newly transferred mitochondrial<br />
prote<strong>in</strong> gene <strong>in</strong> the nucleus.<br />
Materials and methods<br />
Etiolated seedl<strong>in</strong>gs of rice cv. Nipponbare were used as plant<br />
material. Handl<strong>in</strong>g of DNA, RNA, and prote<strong>in</strong>s is described<br />
(Sambrook et al 1989).<br />
Results<br />
rps14-related sequence <strong>in</strong> rice mitochondrial<br />
genome is not functional<br />
A mitochondrial DNA library of rice was screened by us<strong>in</strong>g<br />
the liverwort rps14 gene as a probe to determ<strong>in</strong>e the organization<br />
of the rps14 gene <strong>in</strong> rice. A clone was successfully obta<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
and its DNA was sequenced. The nucleotide sequence<br />
<strong>in</strong>dicated that an rps14-homologous sequence was located one<br />
nucleotide downstream of an rpsl5 gene. The nucleotide and<br />
deduced am<strong>in</strong>o acid sequence comparison with those from<br />
other plant species showed that the rice rpsl5 gene reta<strong>in</strong>s an<br />
<strong>in</strong>tact open read<strong>in</strong>g frame (ORF), whereas the orig<strong>in</strong>al read<strong>in</strong>g<br />
frame of rps14 is <strong>in</strong>terrupted by nucleotide deletions at<br />
four positions.<br />
Gene isolation and function 431
ps14 cDNA<br />
Genomic<br />
structure<br />
sdhB cDNA<br />
poly(A)<br />
poly(A)<br />
740 nt 1,142 nt<br />
Fig. 1.Schematic representation of rice<br />
nuclear rps14 and sdhB genes. Boxes<br />
and th<strong>in</strong> l<strong>in</strong>es represent prote<strong>in</strong> cod<strong>in</strong>g<br />
sequence and nontranslated regions,<br />
respectively. The box with horizontal<br />
l<strong>in</strong>es represents the rps15 gene. rps14-<br />
homologous regions are shown by black<br />
boxes. sdhB-related regions are shown<br />
by hatched boxes. Putative mitochondrial<br />
target<strong>in</strong>g signals are <strong>in</strong>dicated by<br />
boxes with dots.<br />
Functional mitochondrial rps14 is encoded<br />
<strong>in</strong> the nuclear genome<br />
Because the mitochondrial-encoded rps14 sequence <strong>in</strong> rice is<br />
a pseudogene, a functional rps14 gene is likely to be encoded<br />
<strong>in</strong> the nuclear genome. A rice cDNA library made from<br />
poly(A)+RNA was screened by us<strong>in</strong>g the rice mitochondrial<br />
rps14 pseudogene sequence as a probe, result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the identification<br />
of n<strong>in</strong>e positive cDNA clones. The largest cDNA clone<br />
<strong>in</strong>cludes an ORF capable of encod<strong>in</strong>g 350 am<strong>in</strong>o acids.<br />
A nuclear-encoded rps14 gene carries a long<br />
N-term<strong>in</strong>al extension homologous to a part<br />
of the sdhB gene<br />
The deduced am<strong>in</strong>o acid sequence of the nuclear rps14 gene<br />
has an additional 250 am<strong>in</strong>o acid residues at the N-term<strong>in</strong>al<br />
region compared with the mitochondrial rps14 genes from other<br />
plants. Interest<strong>in</strong>gly, a prote<strong>in</strong> database search <strong>in</strong>dicated that<br />
the extended portion (positions 49–225) showed a significant<br />
am<strong>in</strong>o acid sequence similarity to mitochondrial SDHB, which<br />
is a component of complex II <strong>in</strong> the respiratory cha<strong>in</strong> from<br />
humans, yeast, and a malarial parasite (Plasmodium<br />
falciparum).<br />
Because the homologous part is just a part of the sdhB<br />
gene from other species, the rice cDNA library was screened<br />
by us<strong>in</strong>g the sdhB-homologous region of the nuclear rps14<br />
cDNA clone as a probe. The rice sdhB gene isolated showed<br />
58% and 57% am<strong>in</strong>o acid identity to the human and P.<br />
falciparum SDHB, respectively. It is surpris<strong>in</strong>g that the sdhB<br />
and the nuclear rps14 genes of rice have identical nucleotide<br />
sequences not only for their cod<strong>in</strong>g regions but also for the 5′<br />
flank<strong>in</strong>g sequences.<br />
Alternative splic<strong>in</strong>g event is <strong>in</strong>volved for expression<br />
Clon<strong>in</strong>g of the sdhB genomic sequence was carried out by us<strong>in</strong>g<br />
the sdhB cDNA as a probe and four clones were isolated.<br />
Nucleotide sequence analysis and sequence comparison of the<br />
isolated genomic clones <strong>in</strong>dicated that the sequence order is<br />
the 5′ end, the sdhB-rps14 common region, an <strong>in</strong>tron, the<br />
RPS14-cod<strong>in</strong>g region, an <strong>in</strong>tron, the C-term<strong>in</strong>al region specific<br />
for the sdhB gene, and the 3′ end (Fig. 1). Accord<strong>in</strong>g to<br />
this scheme, three exons are separated by two <strong>in</strong>trons. Each of<br />
the four isolated clones has the same physical structure as the<br />
clone sequenced, confirm<strong>in</strong>g that the sdhB-rps14 genomic sequence<br />
represents a s<strong>in</strong>gle locus. The expressions of the sdhB<br />
and the nuclear rps14 genes were exam<strong>in</strong>ed by RNA gel blot<br />
analysis. A 1.2-kb band was detected with all three probes.<br />
Consider<strong>in</strong>g the size of the sdhB (1,132 nt) and the nuclear<br />
rps14 (1,233 nt) cDNAs, the size of the 1.2-kb band is <strong>in</strong> good<br />
agreement with the sizes of the two cDNA clones. Splic<strong>in</strong>g<br />
events of the two gene transcripts were also confirmed by reverse<br />
transcription-polymerase cha<strong>in</strong> reaction (data not shown).<br />
The deduced am<strong>in</strong>o acid sequence of the nuclear<br />
rps14 gene has an N-term<strong>in</strong>al extension that seems<br />
to be a target<strong>in</strong>g signal to mitochondria<br />
To clarify whether the target<strong>in</strong>g signal is cleaved off after prote<strong>in</strong><br />
import <strong>in</strong>to mitochondria, the antirice RPS14 antibody<br />
was raised <strong>in</strong> a rabbit, and prote<strong>in</strong> blot analysis was carried<br />
out by us<strong>in</strong>g antibodies aga<strong>in</strong>st rice RPS14 and P. falciparum<br />
SDHB prote<strong>in</strong>s. A 16.5-kDa peptide was detected when the<br />
anti-RPS14 antibody was used. The size of this peptide is<br />
smaller than that of the RPS14 peptide, as deduced from the<br />
nuclear rps14 cDNA sequence (39.1 kDa). The size of the 16.5-<br />
kDa peptide is larger than that of the predicted mitochondrialencoded<br />
RPS14 peptide (approximately 12 kDa), but it is suspected<br />
that most of the SDHB-homologous region has been<br />
removed.<br />
A signal of 27.2 kDa was detected with the anti-P.<br />
falciparum SDHB antibody, imply<strong>in</strong>g translation and import<br />
of the SDHB prote<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>to mitochondria. The peptide size of<br />
27.2 kDa is 3.9 kDa shorter than that of the SDHB peptide<br />
deduced from the sdhB cDNA sequence (31.1 kDa) and similar<br />
to that of eubacteria, suggest<strong>in</strong>g process<strong>in</strong>g of SDHB prote<strong>in</strong><br />
after prote<strong>in</strong> import.<br />
Discussion<br />
A mitochondrial sequence that has migrated <strong>in</strong>to a nucleus<br />
needs to acquire many sequence elements (e.g., promoter, mitochondrial<br />
target<strong>in</strong>g signal for prote<strong>in</strong> import, and<br />
polyadenylation signal) for its functional expression because<br />
of the difference <strong>in</strong> gene expression systems between the<br />
nucleus and mitochondrion. The alternative splic<strong>in</strong>g event<br />
found <strong>in</strong> this study is an example of the acquisition of a target<strong>in</strong>g<br />
signal. In short, a transferred mitochondrial sequence could<br />
acquire both a nuclear expression system and a mitochondrial<br />
target<strong>in</strong>g signal through its <strong>in</strong>tegration with an already exist<strong>in</strong>g<br />
mitochondrial prote<strong>in</strong> gene <strong>in</strong> the nucleus (Kubo et al 1999).<br />
432 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
Mitochondrion<br />
Nucleus<br />
Transfer<br />
sdhB<br />
Intron<br />
Target<strong>in</strong>g signal<br />
Transfer<br />
rps14<br />
Alternative splic<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Prote<strong>in</strong> import<br />
sdhB<br />
transcript<br />
rps14<br />
transcript<br />
Fig. 2.Model for the gene transfer of sdhB<br />
and rps14. <strong>Rice</strong> nucleus and mitochondrion<br />
are shown by a rectangle and an<br />
enclosure, respectively. Exons and <strong>in</strong>trons<br />
are represented by boxes and broken<br />
l<strong>in</strong>es, respectively. Black and hatched<br />
circles represent the products of rps14<br />
and sdhB genes, respectively. Other symbols<br />
correspond to those <strong>in</strong> Figure 1.<br />
References<br />
Brennicke A, Grohmann L, Hiesel R, Knoop V, Schuster W. 1993.<br />
The mitochondrial genome on its way to the nucleus: different<br />
stages of gene transfer <strong>in</strong> higher plants. FEBS Lett.<br />
325:140-145.<br />
Gray MW. 1992. The endosymbiont hypothesis revisited. Int. Rev.<br />
Cytol. 141:233-357.<br />
Kubo N, Harada K, Hirai A, Kadowaki K. 1999. A s<strong>in</strong>gle nuclear<br />
transcript encod<strong>in</strong>g mitochondrial RPS14 and SDHB of rice<br />
is processed by alternative splic<strong>in</strong>g: common use of the same<br />
mitochondrial target<strong>in</strong>g signal for different prote<strong>in</strong>s. Proc. Natl.<br />
Acad. Sci. USA 96:9207-9211.<br />
Oda K, Yamato K, Ohta E, Nakamura Y, Takemura M, Nozato N,<br />
Akashi K, Kanegae T, Ogura Y, Kohchi T. 1992. Gene organization<br />
deduced from the complete sequence of liverwort<br />
Marchantia polymorpha mitochondrial DNA: a primitive form<br />
of plant mitochondrial genome. J. Mol. Biol. 223:1-7.<br />
Sambrook J, Fritsh EF, Maniatis T. 1989. Molecular clon<strong>in</strong>g: a laboratory<br />
manual. 2nd ed. Pla<strong>in</strong>view, N.Y. (USA): Cold Spr<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Harbor Laboratory Press.<br />
Unseld M, Marienfeld JR, Brandt P, Brennicke A. 1997. The mitochondrial<br />
genome of Arabidopsis thaliana conta<strong>in</strong>s 57 genes<br />
<strong>in</strong> 366,924 nucleotides. Nat. Genet. 15:57-61.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ address: National Institute of Agrobiological Resources,<br />
Department of Genetic Resources II, Kannondai 2-1-2,<br />
Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8602, Japan.<br />
Acknowledgments: We thank Professor K. Ohyama for provid<strong>in</strong>g<br />
the liverwort rps14 gene, Professor K. Kita for provid<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
anti-P. falciparum SDHB antibody, and Drs. A. Hirai and K.<br />
Harada for helpful discussions. This work was partly supported<br />
by a grant from the M<strong>in</strong>istry of Agriculture, Forestry,<br />
and Fisheries to K. Kadowaki and by a Japan Society for the<br />
Promotion of Science research fellowship for junior scientists<br />
to N. Kubo.<br />
Gene isolation and function 433
Transferr<strong>in</strong>g the ribosomal prote<strong>in</strong> S10 gene<br />
from the mitochondrion to the nucleus <strong>in</strong> rice<br />
N. Kubo, X. Jordana, K. Harada, and K. Kadowaki<br />
The mitochondrial genome conta<strong>in</strong>s only a few genes and most mitochondrial prote<strong>in</strong>s seem to be encoded by the nuclear<br />
genome, suggest<strong>in</strong>g a gene transfer event from the mitochondrion to the nucleus dur<strong>in</strong>g evolution. However, little is known<br />
about the details of such gene transfer events. We report that a gene for mitochondrial ribosomal prote<strong>in</strong> S10 (rps10) has been<br />
transferred to the nucleus <strong>in</strong> rice. The rps10 is encoded by the mitochondrial genome <strong>in</strong> potato and pea, but is absent from the<br />
rice mitochondrial genome and has been transferred to the nucleus. Interest<strong>in</strong>gly, there are two rps10 genes <strong>in</strong> the rice nucleus<br />
and their transcript abundance differs. Prote<strong>in</strong> blot analysis detected the RPS10 prote<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice mitochondria, although the<br />
RPS10 has no N-term<strong>in</strong>al presequence for prote<strong>in</strong> target<strong>in</strong>g to mitochondria. This result suggests that target<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>formation is<br />
encoded <strong>in</strong> their <strong>in</strong>ternal region. Genomic sequence analysis <strong>in</strong>dicated that each rps10 gene has an <strong>in</strong>tron <strong>in</strong> the 5′ untranslated<br />
region and that their <strong>in</strong>tron sequences are homologous to each other. This result strongly suggested that a duplication event<br />
occurred after the transfer of the rps10 gene to the nucleus.<br />
It is now generally accepted that mitochondria are descendants<br />
of endosymbiont bacteria (Gray 1992). The mitochondrial genome<br />
conta<strong>in</strong>s only a few genes and most mitochondrial prote<strong>in</strong>s<br />
seem to be encoded by the nuclear genome and imported<br />
<strong>in</strong>to the mitochondria. Different gene contents of current plant<br />
mitochondrial genomes suggest an ongo<strong>in</strong>g process of gene<br />
transfer from the mitochondrion to the nucleus dur<strong>in</strong>g evolution<br />
(Brennicke et al 1993). However, little is still known about<br />
the details of such gene transfer events.<br />
In previous studies, we analyzed several mitochondrial<br />
ribosomal prote<strong>in</strong> genes from rice (Handa et al 1998, Kadowaki<br />
et al 1996, Kubo et al 1996, 1999, Zanlungo et al 1995). In<br />
these studies, we found that a sequence homologous to ribosomal<br />
prote<strong>in</strong> S10 genes (rps10) has been lost from the rice mitochondrial<br />
genome and is present <strong>in</strong> the nuclear genome. The<br />
rps10 genes have been identified <strong>in</strong> the mitochondrial genomes<br />
of potato and pea, but are absent <strong>in</strong> Arabidopsis, Oenothera,<br />
and wheat (Knoop et al 1995, Zanlungo et al 1995). In rice,<br />
two copies of the rps10 genes are present and transcribed <strong>in</strong><br />
the nuclear genome. Their deduced prote<strong>in</strong> sequences show<br />
no additional apparent N-term<strong>in</strong>al presequences for mitochondrial<br />
target<strong>in</strong>g, suggest<strong>in</strong>g that target<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>formation is encoded<br />
<strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>ternal region. The process of rps10-gene transfer and<br />
subsequent duplication of the rps10 gene are discussed.<br />
Materials and methods<br />
Nucleic acid preparation; DNA, RNA, and prote<strong>in</strong> blot analyses;<br />
construction and screen<strong>in</strong>g of recomb<strong>in</strong>ant libraries; and<br />
nucleotide sequence analysis were performed as previously<br />
described (Kadowaki et al 1996, Kubo et al 1999).<br />
Results and discussion<br />
The rps10 gene is located <strong>in</strong> the mitochondrial genome of potato<br />
and pea (Knoop et al 1995, Zanlungo et al 1995). In contrast,<br />
DNA gel blot <strong>in</strong>dicates that an rps10-related sequence<br />
has been completely lost from the mitochondrial genome and<br />
has been transferred to the nuclear genome <strong>in</strong> rice. A rice cDNA<br />
library was screened us<strong>in</strong>g the potato mitochondrial rps10 gene<br />
as a probe to isolate the nuclear rps10 gene. Two k<strong>in</strong>ds of<br />
cDNA clones (s10-1, s10-2) were obta<strong>in</strong>ed, suggest<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
presence and transcription of two rps10-homologous sequences<br />
<strong>in</strong> the rice nucleus. Their predicted am<strong>in</strong>o acid sequences<br />
showed 62–65% homology to the mitochondrial RPS10 from<br />
potato and pea (Knoop et al 1995, Zanlungo et al 1995) and<br />
showed 53–55% homology to the Arabidopsis nuclear RPS10<br />
(Wischmann and Schuster 1995). Transcription of the rice<br />
rps10 genes was analyzed by RNA gel blot analysis. A 0.8-kb<br />
signal was detected us<strong>in</strong>g the cod<strong>in</strong>g region of the s10-1 cDNA<br />
as a probe, <strong>in</strong> good agreement with the size of the s10-1 cDNA<br />
(750 nucleotides). On the contrary, no signal was detected when<br />
the 3′-flank<strong>in</strong>g region of the s10-2 cDNA was used as an s10-<br />
2 specific probe. This result strongly suggested that transcript<br />
abundance of s10-2 is lower than that of s10-1.<br />
In general, mitochondrial prote<strong>in</strong>s encoded <strong>in</strong> the nuclear<br />
genome have signals for mitochondrial target<strong>in</strong>g or the socalled<br />
“presequences.” In Arabidopsis, the nuclear-encoded<br />
RPS10 prote<strong>in</strong> has an N-term<strong>in</strong>al extension as long as 100<br />
am<strong>in</strong>o acids (Wischmann and Schuster 1995). In contrast, the<br />
rice RPS10 polypeptides have no apparent N-term<strong>in</strong>al extensions<br />
for mitochondrial target<strong>in</strong>g. These results suggested that<br />
mechanisms for mitochondrial target<strong>in</strong>g of RPS10 differ between<br />
rice and Arabidopsis. To exam<strong>in</strong>e the presence of RPS10<br />
<strong>in</strong> rice mitochondria, a prote<strong>in</strong> blot analysis was carried out<br />
us<strong>in</strong>g an antibody raised aga<strong>in</strong>st potato RPS10. A band of expected<br />
size (13.0 kDa) was detected <strong>in</strong> a soluble fraction of<br />
rice mitochondrial prote<strong>in</strong>s. Although the rice rps10 genes did<br />
not appear to encode N-term<strong>in</strong>al extensions for presequence,<br />
the rice RPS10 prote<strong>in</strong> was detected <strong>in</strong> rice mitochondria. These<br />
results suggested that target<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>formation of rice RPS10 prote<strong>in</strong>s<br />
is encoded <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>ternal region.<br />
Isolation and nucleotide sequence analysis of the genomic<br />
clones correspond<strong>in</strong>g to the rps10 cDNAs revealed that each<br />
434 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
s10-1 s10-2<br />
Nucleus<br />
Mitochondrion<br />
Mitochondrial genome<br />
Fig. 1. Model for the gene<br />
transfer event of the rice<br />
rps10 gene. Cod<strong>in</strong>g regions<br />
and <strong>in</strong>trons of rice nuclear<br />
rps10 genes are shown by<br />
open boxes and open triangles,<br />
respectively.<br />
rps10 gene has an <strong>in</strong>tron at almost the same position <strong>in</strong> the 5′<br />
untranslated region. Intron sequences are 1,283-bp and 1,683-<br />
bp long, respectively, and share 51% identity. These results<br />
strongly suggested the occurrence of duplication <strong>in</strong> the rps10<br />
gene rather than two <strong>in</strong>dependent transfer events (Fig. 1).<br />
References<br />
Brennicke A, Grohmann L, Hiesel R, Knoop V, Schuster W. 1993.<br />
The mitochondrial genome on its way to the nucleus: different<br />
stages of gene transfer <strong>in</strong> higher plants. FEBS Lett.<br />
325:140-145.<br />
Gray MW. 1992. The endosymbiont hypothesis revisited. Int. Rev.<br />
Cytol. 141:233-357.<br />
Handa H, Kubo N, Kadowaki K. 1998. Genes for the ribosomal S4<br />
prote<strong>in</strong> encoded <strong>in</strong> higher plant mitochondria are transcribed,<br />
edited, and translated. Mol. Gen. Genet. 258:199-207.<br />
Kadowaki K, Kubo N, Ozawa K, Hirai A. 1996. Target<strong>in</strong>g<br />
presequence acquisition after mitochondrial gene transfer to<br />
the nucleus occurs by duplication of exist<strong>in</strong>g target<strong>in</strong>g signals.<br />
EMBO J. 15:6652-6661.<br />
Knoop V, Ehrhardt T, Lattig K, Brennicke A. 1995. The gene for<br />
ribosomal prote<strong>in</strong> S10 is present <strong>in</strong> mitochondria of pea and<br />
potato but absent from those of Arabidopsis and Oenothera.<br />
Curr. Genet. 27:559-564.<br />
Kubo N, Harada K, Hirai A, Kadowaki K. 1999. A s<strong>in</strong>gle nuclear<br />
transcript encod<strong>in</strong>g mitochondrial RPS14 and SDHB of rice<br />
is processed by alternative splic<strong>in</strong>g: common use of the same<br />
mitochondrial target<strong>in</strong>g signal for different prote<strong>in</strong>s. Proc. Natl.<br />
Acad. Sci. USA 96:9207-9211.<br />
Kubo N, Ozawa K, H<strong>in</strong>o T, Kadowaki K. 1996. A ribosomal prote<strong>in</strong><br />
L2 gene is transcribed, spliced, and edited at one site <strong>in</strong> rice<br />
mitochondria. Plant Mol. Biol. 31:853-862.<br />
Wischmann C, Schuster W. 1995. Transfer of rps10 from the mitochondrion<br />
to the nucleus <strong>in</strong> Arabidopsis thaliana: evidence<br />
for RNA-mediated transfer and exon shuffl<strong>in</strong>g at the <strong>in</strong>tegration<br />
site. FEBS Lett. 374:152-156.<br />
Zanlungo S, Quioones V, Moenne A, Holuigue L, Jordana X. 1995.<br />
Splic<strong>in</strong>g and edit<strong>in</strong>g of rps10 transcripts <strong>in</strong> potato mitochondria.<br />
Curr. Genet. 27:565-571.<br />
Notes<br />
Authors’ addresses: N. Kubo and K. Kadowaki, Department of Genetic<br />
Resources II, National Institute of Agrobiological Resources,<br />
Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8602; N. Kubo and K. Harada,<br />
Faculty of Horticulture, Chiba University, Matsudo, Chiba<br />
271-8510, Japan; and X. Jordana, Departamento de Genética<br />
Molecular y Microbiología, Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas,<br />
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.<br />
Acknowledgments: This work was partly supported by a grant from<br />
the M<strong>in</strong>istry of Agriculture, Forestry, and Fisheries to K.K.<br />
and by a grant from the JSPS Research Fellowships for Young<br />
Scientists to N.K.<br />
Gene isolation and function 435
Hypothetical model of genetic regulation<br />
of the glutel<strong>in</strong> biosynthesis pathway<br />
Y. Takemoto, M. Ogawa, T. Kumamaru, T.W. Okita, and H. Satoh<br />
To study the genetic regulation of the glutel<strong>in</strong> biosynthesis pathway, we <strong>in</strong>duced the highly accumulated 57-kDa glutel<strong>in</strong><br />
precursor mutant (57H mutant) and characterized four 57H mutants, esp2, Glup1, glup2, and glup3. Electron-microscopic<br />
observation showed that glutel<strong>in</strong> precursor <strong>in</strong> esp2, Glup1, and glup2 was deposited <strong>in</strong> the mutant-type prote<strong>in</strong> body (PB)<br />
derived from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). Glutel<strong>in</strong> precursor and prolam<strong>in</strong> were mixed <strong>in</strong> the mutant-type PB; prote<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong><br />
both Glup1 and glup2 was distributed separately <strong>in</strong> the PB. The glutel<strong>in</strong> precursors <strong>in</strong> glup3 were deposited <strong>in</strong> the PBII with<br />
mature glutel<strong>in</strong> subunits. Glutel<strong>in</strong> extraction under several conditions <strong>in</strong>dicates that the glutel<strong>in</strong> precursor and prolam<strong>in</strong> polypeptides<br />
aggregate by an <strong>in</strong>tercha<strong>in</strong> S-S bond <strong>in</strong> esp2. Western blot analysis demonstrated that esp2 conta<strong>in</strong>ed BiP and a calnex<strong>in</strong>, but<br />
lacked prote<strong>in</strong> disulfide isomerase (PDI). In esp2, the absence of PDI was considered to have caused glutel<strong>in</strong> precursor<br />
retention <strong>in</strong> the ER by an irregular S-S bond with prolam<strong>in</strong> polypeptides. A partial cDNA clone of PDI was isolated and<br />
sequenced. The PDI clone possessed a thioledox<strong>in</strong> site and ER retention signal, KEDL, at the C-term<strong>in</strong>al. A comparison of<br />
deduced am<strong>in</strong>o acid sequences of PDIs from maize, wheat, and barley showed a shared identity of 84.2% to 84.9%. We<br />
constructed a hypothetical model of genetic regulation of the glutel<strong>in</strong> biosynthesis pathway. The Esp2 gene regulated the<br />
expression of PDI, which played an essential role <strong>in</strong> segregat<strong>in</strong>g the glutel<strong>in</strong> precursor and prolam<strong>in</strong> polypeptides <strong>in</strong> the ER. The<br />
glup1 and Glup2 genes possibly controlled the transportation from the ER to the vacuole. The Glup3 gene regulated the<br />
cleavage of the gluten precursor <strong>in</strong> the vacuole.<br />
<strong>Rice</strong> seed storage prote<strong>in</strong>s—glutel<strong>in</strong> and prolam<strong>in</strong>—are synthesized<br />
on the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and are deposited<br />
<strong>in</strong>to the dist<strong>in</strong>ct organelle. Glutel<strong>in</strong>s are synthesized as the 57-<br />
kDa glutel<strong>in</strong> precursor on the ER membrane (Yamagata et al<br />
1982), transported <strong>in</strong>to the vacuole, cleaved <strong>in</strong>to mature glutel<strong>in</strong><br />
subunits, and accumulated <strong>in</strong> the vacuole component,<br />
namely, as prote<strong>in</strong> body (PB)II (Yamagata and Tanaka 1986).<br />
Prolam<strong>in</strong> polypeptides are synthesized on the ER membrane<br />
and stored as PBI with<strong>in</strong> the ER lumen (Tanaka et al 1980,<br />
Ogawa et al 1987). Relatively little work has been done on the<br />
genetic regulation of the prote<strong>in</strong> biosynthesis pathway.<br />
We <strong>in</strong>duced and characterized the highly accumulated<br />
57-kDa polypeptide mutants (57H mutant) esp2, Glup1, glup2,<br />
and glup3. The 57-kDa polypeptide accumulated <strong>in</strong> four mutants<br />
reacted with both glutel<strong>in</strong> α (alpha) and β (beta) subunits,<br />
show<strong>in</strong>g that the 57-kDa polypeptide deposited <strong>in</strong> these<br />
mutants is a glutel<strong>in</strong> precursor. <strong>Rice</strong> glutel<strong>in</strong> was extracted only<br />
after the removal of globul<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> wild types and mutants. Prior<br />
removal of prolam<strong>in</strong> had no effect on the glutel<strong>in</strong> extraction<br />
(Fig. 1). These results showed that glutel<strong>in</strong> and globul<strong>in</strong> coexisted<br />
with some <strong>in</strong>teraction <strong>in</strong> the PBII and prolam<strong>in</strong> had no<br />
relation to glutel<strong>in</strong> deposition. In esp2, however, the prior removal<br />
of prolam<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> addition to globul<strong>in</strong> removal were essential<br />
to the extraction of the glutel<strong>in</strong> precursor. This result<br />
suggested that, <strong>in</strong> the esp2 mutant, the glutel<strong>in</strong> precursor and<br />
prolam<strong>in</strong> polypeptides were deposited <strong>in</strong>to the same PB and<br />
formed the precursor-prolam<strong>in</strong> aggregates by an <strong>in</strong>tercha<strong>in</strong><br />
disulfide bond. In contrast, the extraction of the glutel<strong>in</strong> precursor<br />
<strong>in</strong> the other three mutants required only the prior removal<br />
of globul<strong>in</strong>.<br />
To specify the deposition site of the glutel<strong>in</strong> precursor<br />
<strong>in</strong> each mutant, develop<strong>in</strong>g endosperms of these mutants were<br />
observed under an electron microscope (Fig. 2). Two types of<br />
PBs—PBI and PBII—were observed <strong>in</strong> the develop<strong>in</strong>g endosperm<br />
of wild-type K<strong>in</strong>maze as reported by Tanaka et al<br />
(1980). In esp2, mutant-type PB and the normal-type PBII were<br />
both observed. The immunolabel<strong>in</strong>g analysis and PB isolation<br />
demonstrated that the glutel<strong>in</strong> precursor accumulated <strong>in</strong> the<br />
mutant-type PB with prolam<strong>in</strong> polypeptides. Other types of<br />
mutant PB that are attached to the polysome were observed <strong>in</strong><br />
Glup1 and glup2 mutants. Although the glutel<strong>in</strong> antibody and<br />
prolam<strong>in</strong> antibody reacted <strong>in</strong> each mutant-type PB, both antibodies<br />
were distributed separately.<br />
<strong>Rice</strong> glutel<strong>in</strong> is cleaved <strong>in</strong>to mature glutel<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> the vacuole<br />
(Yamagata and Tanaka 1986). Glutel<strong>in</strong> precursor and prolam<strong>in</strong><br />
polypeptides were deposited together <strong>in</strong> the mutant-type<br />
PBs, but both prote<strong>in</strong>s were deposited separately. These results<br />
suggested that the glutel<strong>in</strong> precursor of the three mutants<br />
was deposited <strong>in</strong>to the ER-derived PB with prolam<strong>in</strong>. In contrast,<br />
<strong>in</strong> glup3, only normal types of PBI and PBII were observed.<br />
The PB fractionation by sucrose density gradient centrifugation<br />
showed that the glutel<strong>in</strong> precursors <strong>in</strong> glup3 were<br />
fractionated with mature glutel<strong>in</strong>, <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g that these were<br />
deposited <strong>in</strong> the PBII with mature glutel<strong>in</strong> subunits. These results<br />
suggested that mutations <strong>in</strong> esp2, Glup1, and glup2 are<br />
related to the sort<strong>in</strong>g of glutel<strong>in</strong> precursors and prolam<strong>in</strong><br />
polypeptides <strong>in</strong> the ER or the transportation of glutel<strong>in</strong> precursor<br />
from the ER to the vacuole, whereas those of glup3<br />
were related to the cleavage of the glutel<strong>in</strong> precursor <strong>in</strong> the<br />
vacuole.<br />
The assembly of prolam<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> the ER is mediated by b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g<br />
prote<strong>in</strong> (BiP), a k<strong>in</strong>d of chaperone (Li et al 1993, Muench<br />
et al 1997). To clear the effect of the chaperones for 57H mutations,<br />
esp2, Glup1, and glup2 were analyzed by western blot<br />
436 <strong>Advances</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice genetics
0.5 M NaCl – + – + + – + – + + – + – + +<br />
60% n-propanol – – – + – – – – + – – – – + –<br />
5% 2-ME – – + – + – – + – + – – + – +<br />
60% n-propanol<br />
(kDa)<br />
57<br />
Wild type<br />
40<br />
20<br />
esp2<br />
Glup1<br />
13<br />
glup2<br />
57<br />
40<br />
20<br />
13<br />
glup3<br />
Fig. 1. SDS-PAGE<br />
analysis of prote<strong>in</strong>s<br />
extracted by 1% lactic<br />
acid from K<strong>in</strong>maze 57H<br />
mutants after<br />
preextraction with different<br />
solvents. T =<br />
total prote<strong>in</strong>, + = pretreatment,<br />
– = no pretreatment.<br />
Wild type<br />
esp2<br />
Glup1<br />
glup2<br />
glup3<br />
Fig. 2. Electron microscopic<br />
observation of develop<strong>in</strong>g<br />
endosperm of K<strong>in</strong>maze 57H<br />
mutants.<br />
us<strong>in</strong>g antibodies for three k<strong>in</strong>ds of chaperone, BiP, prote<strong>in</strong> disulfide<br />
isomerase (PDI), and calnex<strong>in</strong>. Results showed that esp2<br />
endosperm conta<strong>in</strong>ed an amount of BiP and calnex<strong>in</strong> but lacked<br />
PDI. The prote<strong>in</strong> level of these chaperones <strong>in</strong> Glup1 and glup2<br />
was almost the same as <strong>in</strong> the wild type (Fig. 3). Developmental<br />
deposition analysis of glutel<strong>in</strong>, prolam<strong>in</strong>, PDI, and BiP <strong>in</strong><br />
the wild type showed that PDI expression synchronized with<br />
the expression of glutel<strong>in</strong> (Fig. 4). This result suggested the<br />
possibility that PDI affects the assembly and fold<strong>in</strong>g of the<br />
glutel<strong>in</strong> precursor <strong>in</strong> the ER. In esp2, the absence of PDI was<br />
considered to have caused the formation of the precursor-prolam<strong>in</strong><br />
aggregate by a disulfide bond, result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> retention of<br />
the glutel<strong>in</strong> precursor with<strong>in</strong> the ER lumen. In Glup1 and glup2,<br />
glutel<strong>in</strong> precursors and prolam<strong>in</strong> polypeptides may have been<br />
deposited <strong>in</strong>to the ER-derived PB; both prote<strong>in</strong>s were not aggregated<br />
because of PDI, support<strong>in</strong>g the hypothesis that PDI<br />
plays a role <strong>in</strong> sort<strong>in</strong>g glutel<strong>in</strong> precursors and prolam<strong>in</strong> polypeptides<br />
<strong>in</strong> the ER.<br />
A partial cDNA clone of PDI was isolated from the<br />
cDNA library made from develop<strong>in</strong>g rice seed and sequenced.<br />
The PDI clone possessed a thioledox<strong>in</strong> site and ER retention<br />
signal, and tetrapeptide KDEL at the C-term<strong>in</strong>al. Comparison<br />
Gene isolation and function 437
Develop<strong>in</strong>g seed<br />
Wild type<br />
esp2<br />
Glup1<br />
glup2<br />
Wild type<br />
Mature seed<br />
esp2<br />
Glup1<br />
glup2<br />
(kDa)<br />
3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10<br />
57<br />
40<br />
BiP<br />
20<br />
13<br />
BiP<br />
PDI<br />
57 kDa<br />
α subunit<br />
Calnex<strong>in</strong><br />
β subunit<br />
Prolam<strong>in</strong><br />
Days after flower<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Fig. 4. Western blot analysis of developmental changes of seed storage<br />
prote<strong>in</strong> deposition and BiP and PDI activities <strong>in</strong> wild-type K<strong>in</strong>maze.<br />
PDI<br />
Fig. 3. Western blot analysis of the prote<strong>in</strong> from<br />
the mature and immature seed of 57H mutant<br />
treated with anti-BiP, anti-calnex<strong>in</strong>, and anti-PDI<br />
antibodies.<br />
of the deduced am<strong>in</strong>o acid sequence of PDIs from maize,<br />
wheat, and barley showed that the PDIs shared 84.2% to 84.9%<br />
identity. Northern blot analysis us<strong>in</strong>g the PDI clone as a pro