Corporate plan (PDF 936 kB) - Tanzania National Parks
Corporate plan (PDF 936 kB) - Tanzania National Parks
Corporate plan (PDF 936 kB) - Tanzania National Parks
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Tanzania</strong> <strong>National</strong> <strong>Parks</strong>
TABLE OF CONTENTS<br />
PREFACE …………………………………………………………………................................................…...........<br />
BOARD OF TRUSTEES ……………..............................……………………………..................…….…...............<br />
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY …………………..…………………………...................................................…............<br />
ABBREVIATIONS ……………………………………………………...............................................……..............<br />
i<br />
iv<br />
v<br />
vii<br />
1. CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION …………………………………..............................................…........... 1<br />
1.1. Background ………………………………………….………….............................................……….......... 1<br />
1.2. Methodology ………………………………………...….............................................……………….......... 2<br />
1.3. Benefits of the CSP …………………………………………................................................………............ 3<br />
1.4. Outlines of the CSP …………………………………………...............................................…………......... 3<br />
2. CHAPTER TWO: SITUATIONAL ANALYSIS …………...……...................................................……......... 4<br />
2.1. Recent history …………………………………….………............................................……………........... 4<br />
2.2. Organization’s legal mandate …………………………................................................................................ 6<br />
2.3. Existing Organizational Vision and Mission …………………………......................................................... 6<br />
2.3.1. Vision ………………………………………………..………………................................................ 6<br />
2.3.2. Mission ……………………………………………………………................................................... 6<br />
2.4. Recent Initiatives and Developments ………………………….…………................................................... 7<br />
2.4.1. Macro and Sectoral Initiative in <strong>Tanzania</strong> …………………………................................................. 7<br />
2.4.2. Review of Current Tourism Trend ………………………………...............................……….......... 9<br />
2.4.3. TANAPA initiatives ………………………………………...…………........................................... 12<br />
2.5. SWOC Analysis (Organizational Scan) …………………………….........................................……............ 15<br />
2.5.1. Strength .……………………………………………………..……….................................….......... 15<br />
2.5.2. Weakness ……………………………………………………...………............................................. 16<br />
2.5.3. Opportunities ……………………………..................................……………………..……….......... 16<br />
2.5.4. Challenges …………………………………………………………….............................................. 17<br />
2.5.5. Problem analysis ………………………………………………………............................................ 17<br />
2.6. Stakeholder/Customer Analysis ………………………………….........................................………............ 20<br />
2.7. Critical Issues ……………………………………………….............................................…………............ 24<br />
2.8. Strategic Core Functions …………………………………….............................................…...……............ 26<br />
2.8.1. Role of Board of Trustees …………………………………..…......................................................... 26<br />
2.8.2. Role of the Director General ………………………………............................................….............. 27<br />
2.8.3. Role of the Directors ………………………………………….......................................................... 27<br />
3. CHAPTER THREE: THE PLAN ………..…………………………..............................................…............... 29<br />
3.1.1. Core Values ………………………………………................................……………………............. 29<br />
3.1.2. Vision statement ………………………………………………..................................………........... 29<br />
3.1.3. Mission Statement ………………………………………................................………..……............ 29<br />
3.1.4. Strategic Objectives ………………………………………………..................................…….......... 29<br />
4. CHAPTER FOUR: STRATEGIES AND TARGETS …………………............................................................ 32<br />
ANNEXURE 1: ORGANIZATION STRUCTURE …………..…………………..................................…........... 39<br />
ANNEXURE 2: SUMMARY OF THE CSP ……………………………………...................................…............ 40<br />
BOXES, FIGURES AND TABLES<br />
Box 1.1: Conservation …………………………………………………………………............................................ 1<br />
Box 2.1: Local Communities …………………………………………………...............................…………........... 4<br />
Box 2.2: Stakeholders ………………………………………………………………...............................…….......... 4<br />
Box 2.3: Benefit Sharing …………………………………………………………..............................……….......... 5<br />
Table 2.1: Average growth rate (%) of International Tourists Arrivals World Wide by region, 1995-2020............... 10<br />
Table 2.2: Tourism Trend in <strong>Tanzania</strong> 2001-2005 ………………………….................................………................. 11<br />
Figure 1: Number of Tourists Arrivals from 2000/01 to 2004/05 …………………...............................…............... 13<br />
Figure 2: Revenue trend …………………………………………………………..............................……................ 15<br />
Table 4.1: Strategies and Targets ……………………………………………………................................…........... 32<br />
Table 4.2: Strategies and Targets ……………………………………………………................................…........... 33<br />
Table 4.3: Strategies and Targets …………………………………………………….................................….......... 34<br />
Table 4.4: Strategies and Targets …………………………………………………................................…............... 35<br />
Table 4.5: Strategies and Targets ……………………………………………………................................…........... 36<br />
Table 4.6: Strategies and Targets ……………………………………………………................................…........... 37<br />
Table 4.7: Strategies and Targets …………………………………………………….................................….......... 38
i<br />
PREFACE<br />
Statement of the Chairman of the Board of Trustees<br />
Conservation in <strong>Tanzania</strong>n <strong>National</strong> <strong>Parks</strong> is the<br />
main thrust of the organization as clearly stated by<br />
law. In order to manage the parks efficiently and<br />
effectively, a timely review of key strategic<br />
decisions is important. During the implementation<br />
of the previous <strong>Corporate</strong> Strategic Plan (CSP) of<br />
2001 – 2006, the Board of Trustees embarked on<br />
fundamental decisions that aimed at transforming the<br />
organization towards improved resource management and optimal<br />
revenue generation.<br />
The new CSP 2008/09 -2012/13 emphasizes on the organization’s<br />
mandate, of conservation, which is in line with the <strong>National</strong><br />
Development Vision 2025. The vision underscores the importance of<br />
conservation of our national heritage. The CSP also puts a special<br />
emphasis for TANAPA on contributing to poverty reduction, as<br />
stipulated in the <strong>National</strong> Strategy on Growth and Reduction of Poverty<br />
(NSGRP – MKUKUTA). The Board is therefore determined to promote<br />
tourism significantly as a mechanism of not only generating funds for<br />
conservation purposes, but also contributing to poverty reduction. The<br />
institution has been supporting community social projects and in this<br />
new CSP, efforts will be made to enhance its collaboration with<br />
adjacent communities.<br />
The Board is aware of the turbulent economic, technological and<br />
political environment in which the organization is operating, thus a<br />
need for frequent review of its strategies. The Board of Trustees is<br />
convinced that, this CSP’s vision, which is “to be the highest globally<br />
rated institution in sustainable conservation and provision of<br />
exceptional tourism services”, will be attained significantly within the<br />
<strong>plan</strong>ned five years.Therefore, the Board of Trustees commits itself to<br />
give the management total support to implement this CSP.<br />
Mr. Modestus Lilungulu<br />
Chairman, Board of Trustees<br />
Arusha, February 2008
ii<br />
Statement of the Director General<br />
It has been an exciting moment for <strong>Tanzania</strong><br />
<strong>National</strong> <strong>Parks</strong> (TANAPA) to ascend to a point<br />
where we have in place a new <strong>Corporate</strong> Strategic<br />
Plan (2008/09 – 2012/13), which will enable the<br />
organisation to attain her dream as the highest<br />
globally rated organization in sustainable<br />
conservation and delivery of exceptional tourism<br />
services.<br />
The readers of this third generation of the organization corporate <strong>plan</strong>s,<br />
which started back in 1997, will realise that we are determined to make<br />
a difference in all aspects. We intend to bridge gaps that currently exist<br />
and to adapt new ways of doing business. Additionally, we are aware of<br />
what is taking place elsewhere in the World in relation to conservation<br />
business. It gives us pleasure to have in place the framework for<br />
executing the institution’s daily operations with effectiveness and<br />
efficiency while not compromising the sustainability of our valuable<br />
natural resources.<br />
The identified organizational objectives to fulfill our institution’s<br />
conservation mandate in accordance to this new CSP are:<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
To ensure that the institutional capacity is developed to<br />
operate effectively and efficiently at all levels;<br />
To improve staff welfare and benefits;<br />
To effectively conserve the national parks biodiversity and<br />
their adjacent ecosystems;<br />
To realize the organization’s potential in income generation;<br />
To improve organizational partnerships with adjacent<br />
communities and key stakeholders in the management of<br />
parks and buffer zones;<br />
To develop and maintain infrastructure to achieve<br />
institutional development goals; and lastly,<br />
To improve management and implementation of programmes<br />
and <strong>plan</strong>s.<br />
These institutional objectives will definitely propel the organization<br />
towards attainment of her core business.
iii<br />
This <strong>plan</strong> draws inputs from a workshop that was conducted from<br />
12 th -14 th February 2007 at Uhuru Hostel in Moshi. The workshop was<br />
attended by the Directors, Managers and Chief Park Wardens from all<br />
the parks. Personally, I would like to convey my appreciation to the<br />
Consultant, Mr. Nathaniel Rusumo and the workshop participants for<br />
their valuable inputs. I am also thankful to the Board of Trustees for<br />
their valuable inputs and by availing Trustee Erasmus Tarimo to work<br />
with Mr. Sam Swai (Consultant) in Bagamoyo from 11 th to 15 th<br />
February 2008. Lastly, but not least, I am grateful to the technical team<br />
for their endless effort in drafting and finalizing this important <strong>plan</strong><br />
document.<br />
My call to all stakeholders is to continue giving us material and moral<br />
support while managing our national parks to enable TANAPA achieve<br />
her dream of being the highest globally rated organization in her efforts<br />
for the benefit of humanity. We can do it, let us all play our part!<br />
Gerald Bigurube<br />
Director General<br />
Arusha, February 2008
iv<br />
BOARD OF TRUSTEES<br />
Mr. Modestus Lilungulu<br />
Chairman<br />
Mrs Mariam Wilmore<br />
IGP Saidi A. Mwema<br />
Mr Lukonge P. Mhandagani<br />
Hajjat Mrs Zainab G. Muruke<br />
Hon. Riziki S. Lulinda (MP)<br />
Mr Erasmus Tarimo<br />
Hon. Lazaro Nyalandu (MP) Dr. Marcellina Chijoriga<br />
Prof. Bukheti Kilonzo<br />
Mr. Gerald Bigurube<br />
Hon. Ramadhan A. Maneno (MP)
v<br />
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY<br />
Introduction<br />
This CSP (2008/09-2012/13) has 7 strategic objectives (SOs),<br />
25 strategies and 51 targets.<br />
Core Values (<strong>Corporate</strong> culture)<br />
The organizational core values are:<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Accountable organization managing national parks<br />
sustainably<br />
Innovative and highly organized institution in providing<br />
high quality services<br />
Efficient in deploying resources to exceed customer<br />
expectations<br />
Vision Statement<br />
To be the highest globally rated institution in<br />
sustainable conservation and provision<br />
of exceptional tourism services<br />
Mission Statement<br />
Our mission is to sustainably<br />
conserve and manage park resources<br />
and their aesthetic value, for the benefit of present and future<br />
generations of mankind, as well as efficiently provide high class<br />
tourism products and services.<br />
Strategic Objectives<br />
The organizational objectives for the institution within the coming five<br />
years are:<br />
1. Institutional capacity to operate effectively and efficiently<br />
developed;
vi<br />
2. Staff welfare and benefits improved;<br />
3. <strong>National</strong> parks biodiversity and their adjacent ecosystems<br />
effectively conserved;<br />
4. Organization’s potential in income generation realized;<br />
5. Organizational partnerships with adjacent communities and<br />
key stakeholders in the management of parks and buffer<br />
zones improved;<br />
6. Infrastructure to achieve institutional development goals<br />
developed and maintained; and lastly,<br />
7. Management and implementation of programmes and <strong>plan</strong>s<br />
improved.<br />
Expected Outcome of the CSP<br />
It is envisaged that at the end of the five years, which is in June 2013,<br />
the outcome will be:<br />
High service delivery standards<br />
Improvement in corporate productivity<br />
Increased staff morale<br />
Low labour turnover<br />
Reduced operational costs and time<br />
Increased visitors experience<br />
Increased accessibility<br />
Increased species richness, distribution and diversity<br />
More avenues for income generation<br />
Increase in income generation thus self sufficiency to meet<br />
operations<br />
Increase in contribution to the Treasury<br />
Increased presence and movement of wildlife between core<br />
and surrounding areas<br />
Improved participation and collaboration<br />
Reduced conflicts<br />
Increased rationalization of institutional resources for<br />
management<br />
Increased productivity<br />
Timely and appropriate decisions<br />
Increased level of customer satisfaction
ABBREATIONS<br />
AICC<br />
BoT<br />
CITES<br />
CSP<br />
DFID<br />
EA<br />
EAC<br />
EU<br />
GIS<br />
GMP<br />
GPS<br />
GTZ<br />
HIV/AIDS<br />
ICT<br />
IUCN<br />
JICA<br />
LAN<br />
M & E<br />
MNRT<br />
MTEF<br />
NORAD<br />
POS<br />
ROI<br />
SWOC<br />
TANAPA<br />
TANESCO<br />
TATO<br />
TNA<br />
TTB<br />
TTCL<br />
UNDP<br />
UNEP<br />
UNESCO<br />
UNWTO<br />
USAID<br />
URT<br />
WAN<br />
WMAs<br />
Arusha International Conference Centre<br />
Board of Trustees<br />
Convention on International Trade of Endangered Species<br />
<strong>Corporate</strong> Strategic Plan<br />
Department for International Development<br />
East Africa<br />
East African Community<br />
European Union<br />
Geographic Information System<br />
General Management Plan<br />
Global Positioning System<br />
Deutsche Gesellschsft fur Technische Zusammenarbeit<br />
Human Immunodeficiency Virus/Acquired Immune Deficiency<br />
Syndrome<br />
Information and Communication Technology<br />
International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural<br />
Resources (World Conservation Union)<br />
Japanese International Cooperation Agency<br />
Local Area Network<br />
Monitoring and Evaluation<br />
Ministry of Natural Resources and Tourism<br />
Medium Term Expenditure Framework<br />
Norwegian Agency for International Development<br />
Point of Sales<br />
Return on Investments<br />
Strength, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Challenges<br />
<strong>Tanzania</strong> <strong>National</strong> <strong>Parks</strong><br />
<strong>Tanzania</strong> Electric Supply Company<br />
<strong>Tanzania</strong> Association of Tour Operators<br />
Training Needs Assessment<br />
<strong>Tanzania</strong> Tourist Board<br />
<strong>Tanzania</strong> Telecommunication Company Limited<br />
United <strong>National</strong> Development Programme<br />
United Nations Environmental Programme<br />
United Nations Education, Scientific and Cultural Organization<br />
United Nations World Tourism Organization<br />
United States Agency for International Development<br />
United Republic of <strong>Tanzania</strong><br />
Wide Area Network<br />
Wildlife Management Areas<br />
vii
1<br />
1.1 Background Information<br />
CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION<br />
The Tanganyika <strong>National</strong> <strong>Parks</strong> Ordinance CAP [412] of 1959<br />
established the organization now known as <strong>Tanzania</strong> <strong>National</strong> <strong>Parks</strong><br />
(TANAPA), and Serengeti became the first <strong>National</strong> Park. In this<br />
document, TANAPA is also referred to as “the organization or the<br />
institution”. By February 2007, the organization has grown to<br />
15 national parks. Conservation of eco-systems in all areas designated<br />
as national parks is the core business of the organisation (Box 1).<br />
Box 1.1: Conservation<br />
The term embeds protection or preservation or management and rational<br />
utilization of natural resources<br />
Nature based or wildlife tourism is the main source of income that is<br />
ploughed back for management, regulation, and fulfilment of all<br />
organisational mandates in the national parks.<br />
This <strong>Corporate</strong> Strategic Plan (CSP) is a document that produces<br />
fundamental decisions and actions that shape and guide what the<br />
institution is, what it does, and why it does it. The core contents of the<br />
CSP are:<br />
Vision<br />
Mission<br />
Strategic Objectives<br />
Strategies<br />
Targets<br />
Review of the CSP<br />
During the review of the previous CSP (2001-2006), it was revealed<br />
that <strong>plan</strong>ning was participative especially at headquarters but not so at<br />
all park levels. Also inadequate monitoring and evaluation of its<br />
implementation was found to be the major weakness. It was further<br />
noted that, most parks failed to link the CSP to the General<br />
Management Plans (GMPs) of individual parks. Inadequate capacity<br />
building of staff at all levels hampered the effective implementation of
2<br />
the CSP and other associated <strong>plan</strong>s. In addition, although the Clients’<br />
Service Charter (CSC) as a framework for customer care was<br />
developed it has not been fully institutionalised at the corporate level.<br />
1.2 Methodology<br />
Based on the previous review of the CSP, there is a need for this <strong>plan</strong><br />
(2008/09-2012/13) to reflect corporate ideas, dynamism, and team<br />
spirit. The main theme for this <strong>plan</strong> is: “To be the highest globally<br />
rated institution in sustainable conservation of national parks<br />
resources and provision of exceptional tourism products”.<br />
This third generation of corporate strategic <strong>plan</strong>s is formulated taking<br />
into consideration the observations in section 1.1 above.<br />
TANAPA organised a participatory <strong>plan</strong>ning workshop, which was held<br />
at Uhuru Hostel, Moshi from 12th - 14th February 2007 to review and<br />
prepare this CSP. The Director General, Directors, Managers, Chief<br />
Park Wardens, and senior staff participated in the workshop. An<br />
overview of the previous CSP was made through three presentations as<br />
follows:<br />
A presentation on the status of the implementation of the<br />
2001 – 2006 CSP from the <strong>plan</strong>ning perspectives;<br />
A presentation on the status of implementation of the same<br />
<strong>plan</strong> from the practical field perspective; and<br />
A presentation on key issues emanating from the <strong>plan</strong> and<br />
critical review of other documents from an external<br />
perspective.<br />
Participants met in small groups to discuss the reviews in relation to the<br />
mandate of organization and later presented the same in the plenary for<br />
consensus. The plenary integrated the reviews to produce situational<br />
analysis and key issues relevant to the institution. These issues were<br />
analysed to generate strategic objectives, strategies, and targets for<br />
achieving the vision and mission of the organization.<br />
In order for the organization to come up with a vision and mission<br />
tagged at world-class standards, the workshop participants discussed,<br />
among others, the following:<br />
The significance of the World Heritage Sites (Serengeti and<br />
Kilimanjaro), 7 th Wonder of the current World (Serengeti
3<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
wildebeest migration) and Biosphere Reserves (Serengeti and<br />
LakeManyara) in the <strong>Tanzania</strong> <strong>National</strong> <strong>Parks</strong> system;<br />
The World and regional tourism trends;<br />
The East African Community (EAC) Treaty and the<br />
possibility of establishment of the East African Federation;<br />
and<br />
The world trends on principles of conservation in relation to<br />
<strong>Tanzania</strong> tourism.<br />
The document was widely distributed to headquarters staff and<br />
individual national parks for comments. The Management presented the<br />
document to the Board of Trustees for approval. A workshop for both<br />
operational staff, Management as well as the Board of Trustees will be<br />
conducted to instil the commitment to implement the <strong>plan</strong>. Furthermore,<br />
the output of the capacity-building workshop is to internalise the <strong>plan</strong><br />
and create ownership of the same at all levels of the<br />
organization.<br />
1.3 Benefits of the CSP<br />
Upon implementation of this CSP, the following will be achieved:<br />
First, it will bridge gaps between what used to exist in the<br />
institution and what is envisaged so as to demonstrate<br />
alertness to change in the global business;<br />
Secondly, there will be readiness to offer something new,<br />
especially in relation to tourism development, that is to<br />
demonstrate insights of what is happening in the<br />
organization and elsewhere in the world;<br />
Thirdly, there will be new ways of doing organizational<br />
business (new culture);<br />
Fourthly, execution and allocation of resources as <strong>plan</strong>ned at<br />
a corporate level will be made effective.<br />
1.4 Outline of the CSP<br />
Chapter one provides an introduction of the previous <strong>plan</strong>s,<br />
methodology, benefits and outline. Chapter two discusses the situational<br />
analysis of the organization and what is happening elsewhere. Chapter<br />
three provides the <strong>plan</strong> including the core values, vision, mission and<br />
strategic objectives. Chapter four has the strategies and targets.
4<br />
2.1 Recent History<br />
CHAPTER TWO: SITUATIONAL ANALYSIS<br />
The institution continued with its mandate to manage and regulate use<br />
of areas designated as national parks by regular patrols to curb<br />
poaching against wildlife and forest products, to promote and monitor<br />
tourism activities so as to avoid overuse of the areas. Ecological and<br />
wildlife health monitoring were carried out. Collaboration with local<br />
communities (Box 3) living adjacent to national parks and other<br />
relevant stakeholders was enhanced through the outreach programme.<br />
Box 2.1: Local Communities<br />
This terminology embraces all villages, wards, divisions and district authorities<br />
sharing boarders with national parks.<br />
Ecological changes occurring inside and outside the parks are of<br />
consequential influence to wildlife resources in the parks. Both natural<br />
and man made impacts were recorded and where necessary mitigated.<br />
Climatic changes, which are resulting in extensive disturbance to<br />
ecological processes in the parks, were closely monitored in<br />
collaboration with both national and international institutions.<br />
During the implementation of the previous CSP, the organization<br />
continued to place higher priority on protection of natural resources,<br />
park facilities and safety of visitors. The resources protection and<br />
operations were strengthened in collaboration with surrounding<br />
communities and other relevant stakeholders (Box 2.2).<br />
Box 2.2: Stakeholders<br />
The term, in its broad sense, refers to anybody with legitimate interest to<br />
national parks and/or is affected by its presence either negatively or positively.<br />
The organization also provided support to village governments in<br />
training Village Games Scouts (VGS) for the protection of<br />
community-conserved areas. Modern equipment for anti-poaching<br />
activities was provided to park rangers. New recruitments for park<br />
rangers and training were conducted in order to equip them with
5<br />
modern skills and techniques in the resource protection.<br />
On the tourism front, the organizational goal has always been to<br />
enhance visitor experience and enjoyment in the parks to match with<br />
the changing and diverse demands and tastes. In order to enhance<br />
visitor experience, the institution progressively improved its services,<br />
facilities and infrastructure for tourists visiting the national parks.<br />
Production of information materials indicating potential resources was<br />
given due emphasis. Marketing programmes were carried out<br />
aiming at luring more tourists to visit the parks.<br />
As part of corporate social responsibility, the organization through its<br />
Outreach Program Department continued to carry its function of<br />
creating awareness to local communities living adjacent to parks on the<br />
importance of conservation and benefit sharing (Box 2.3) from revenue<br />
accrued from tourism.<br />
Box 2.3: Benefit sharing<br />
TANAPA contributes to the well-being of the local communities according to<br />
the ability of the parks. This sharing of benefits includes sharing of infrastructure<br />
and services, cash or in-kind contributions to local projects, and assistance<br />
in setting up sustainable income generating enterprises based on<br />
non-park natural resources.<br />
However, emphasis is now being put into supporting income-generating<br />
projects such as bee-keeping, community conservation banks, poultry<br />
and livestock keeping. Despite the above achievements, the<br />
organization faces a number of challenges including the following:<br />
Poaching<br />
Habitat degradation<br />
Blockage of wildlife corridors<br />
Unclear demarcation of most of national parks’ boundaries<br />
Lack of buffer zones<br />
Inadequate resources (human, financial and physical)<br />
Inadequate business skills among communities.
6<br />
2.2 Organization’s Legal Mandate<br />
The organization’s mandate is “to manage and regulate the use of areas<br />
designated as <strong>National</strong> <strong>Parks</strong> by such means and measures to preserve<br />
the country’s heritage, encompassing natural and cultural resources,<br />
both tangible and intangible resource values”, including:<br />
Fauna and flora, wildlife habitat, natural processes,<br />
wilderness qualities, scenery therein, and<br />
Provide the same for human benefit and enjoyment in such<br />
manner and by such means as will leave them unimpaired<br />
for future generations.<br />
2.3 Existing Organizational Vision and Mission<br />
2.3.1 Vision<br />
The vision of the institution in the previous CSP was to; “Ensure<br />
sustainable conservation of parks resources and values for the benefit<br />
and enjoyment of the present and future generations of mankind”.<br />
2.3.2 Mission<br />
Likewise, in the previous CSP of 2001-2006, the mission was to,<br />
“Sustainably conserve the <strong>Parks</strong> resources and values for the benefit of<br />
all humankind” through:<br />
Protecting and regulating use of areas designated as<br />
<strong>National</strong> <strong>Parks</strong>;<br />
Selecting and recommending for gazettement areas of<br />
ecological, cultural and scientific significance;<br />
Strategically managing a national system of <strong>Parks</strong> that<br />
protect outstanding example of key ecosystems in<br />
collaboration with local communities, and<br />
Developing, managing and promoting tourism and other<br />
revenue generating activities for the benefit of all<br />
<strong>Tanzania</strong>ns, the African continent and the World at large.
7<br />
2.4 Recent Initiatives and Developments<br />
2.4.1 Macro and Sectoral Initiatives in <strong>Tanzania</strong><br />
a) <strong>Tanzania</strong>’s Development Vision 2025<br />
During 1980’s the government realized that the past development<br />
policies and strategies were not adequately responding to changing<br />
market and technological conditions in the world economy. In response,<br />
beginning mid-1986, the Government adopted various socio-economic<br />
reforms and during their implementation, it became apparent to the<br />
government that those socio-economic reforms were not adequately<br />
informed by a national long-term development philosophy and<br />
direction. Realization of this led to the formulation of the <strong>Tanzania</strong><br />
Development Vision.<br />
The Vision is an articulation of a desirable future condition or situation<br />
which <strong>Tanzania</strong> envisages to attain and the plausible course of action to<br />
be taken for its achievement. The Vision was adopted by the<br />
Government in 1999 and its implementation started in 2000. The<br />
objective of the vision is to awaken, coordinate and direct the people’s<br />
efforts, minds and national resources towards those core sectors that<br />
will enable us to attain our development goals.<br />
The Vision envisions that <strong>Tanzania</strong> will have the following attributes by<br />
the year 2025:<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
High quality livelihood: a nation’s development should be<br />
people centered based on sustainable and shared growth and<br />
be free from abject poverty;<br />
A strong and competitive economy: this emphasizes the<br />
need to have an economy which can effectively cope with<br />
the challenges of development and which can easily benefit<br />
from global economy;<br />
Good governance: this entails to strengthen a culture of<br />
accountability, rewarding good performance and effectively<br />
curbing corruption and vices in the society;
8<br />
<br />
<br />
A well educated and learning population: this envisages a<br />
nation whose people are engrained with a developmental<br />
mindset and competitive spirit. It is driven by education and<br />
knowledge; and<br />
Peace, stability and unity: peace, political stability and<br />
national unity and social cohesion are important pillars for<br />
realization of vision. Therefore, they should continue to be<br />
cultivated, nurtured and sustained.<br />
In order to attain those aspirations, determination and discipline in<br />
<strong>plan</strong>ning and implementation is important. TANAPA therefore will<br />
direct her efforts to contribute to the realization of the Vision 2025.<br />
b) Fourth Government’s vision on conservation<br />
The inaugural speech by His Excellence the fourth President of United<br />
Republic of <strong>Tanzania</strong> Jakaya Mrisho Kikwete delivered on December<br />
30 th , 2005, in the parliament in Dodoma, shows clearly that the central<br />
theme of the fourth government, [same period of this <strong>plan</strong>], is<br />
conservation of natural resources to its original state as well as<br />
responsible tourism development and promotion. By responsible<br />
tourism it means, that <strong>Tanzania</strong> needs to develop the kind of tourism<br />
that gives direct benefits to local communities adjacent to tourist<br />
attractions while at the same time caring for the environment. This<br />
inaugural speech by the Head of State clearly shows where <strong>Tanzania</strong> is<br />
heading to in relation to conservation of natural resources. Strategic<br />
objectives of this CSP have incorporated the central theme of the<br />
President’s speech.<br />
c) Ministry of Natural Resources and Tourism’s (MNRT) vision,<br />
mission and strategic objectives<br />
i) Vision<br />
Sustainable conservation of natural and cultural resources and<br />
development of responsible tourism for all.
9<br />
ii) Mission<br />
In order to conform to the vision, the operating mission of the Ministry<br />
is to conserve natural and cultural resources sustainably and develop<br />
tourism for national prosperity and for the benefit of humanity through:<br />
Development of appropriate policies, strategies and<br />
guidelines;<br />
Formulation of laws and regulations;<br />
Monitoring and evaluation of the implementation of policies;<br />
Promotion of quality tourism business of local and global<br />
communities; and<br />
Development of human resources and institutional capacity<br />
building at all levels.<br />
d) Review of Wildlife Policy (1998) and Conservation Act of 1974<br />
Review of Wildlife Policy of 1998 and Act of 1974 reflect the critical<br />
need for various pertinent issues for transformation of wildlife<br />
sub-sector in <strong>Tanzania</strong>. These issues include: wildlife corridors,<br />
national parks and game reserves buffer zones, wildlife management<br />
areas (WMAs) and the whole concept of community based<br />
conservation that advocates community ownership and management of<br />
protected areas. Summation of this review is compatible with the world<br />
and regional trends in new conservation principles and strategies.<br />
2.4.2 Review of Current Tourism Trends<br />
a) World and Regional Trends in Conservation Principles<br />
United Nations Development Programme (UNDP 1990) advocates that<br />
any development intervention whether at an international, regional or<br />
national/local level is sustainable only if it is people centered or has<br />
practical human inclusion in its functions. Authors Opschoor (2002)<br />
and Mahbub (1998) also share this perspective on sustainable<br />
development. The concept of responsible tourism, which is the popular<br />
theme of UNWTO is in agreement with this UNDP perspective.<br />
UNWTO supports the popular concept of responsible tourism, which is,<br />
to conserve environment while at the same time alleviating poverty.
) World and Regional Tourism Trends<br />
Comparison of growth rate of tourism in <strong>Tanzania</strong> with the world and<br />
by region shows that, tourism growth in <strong>Tanzania</strong> grew at the rate of<br />
10% between 1995 and 2000, while during 2000-2005 the tourism<br />
sector grew at the rate of 9.3% . Tourism has been growing in <strong>Tanzania</strong><br />
at an average rate of 3.7% more than Africa as a region per annum<br />
(Table 2.1).<br />
Table 2.1: Average Annual Growth Rate (%) of International<br />
Tourist Arrivals World Wide and by region, 1995-2020<br />
Region 1995-2000 2000-2010 2010-2020<br />
Africa 6.0 5.6 5.1<br />
Americas 3.9 3.8 3.8<br />
East Asia/Pacific 7.7 7.2 6.6<br />
Europe 3.1 3.1 3.1<br />
Middle East 6.9 6.7 6.5<br />
South Asia 6.4 6.2 5.8<br />
World 4.2 4.2 4.4<br />
<strong>Tanzania</strong> 10 9.3 N/A<br />
Difference<br />
Between<br />
<strong>Tanzania</strong> and<br />
4.0 3.7 N/A<br />
Africa<br />
Source: World Tourism Organization (UNWTO): Tourism 2020 Vision<br />
c) East African Community (EAC) Treaty<br />
The central theme of East African Community (EAC) Treaty on<br />
conservation is the same as that of UNDP and UNWTO. The treaty<br />
puts emphasis on quality tourism and sustainable development, which<br />
is people, centered.<br />
10
11<br />
d) <strong>Tanzania</strong>’s Tourism Trend (Tourism Policy – 1999)<br />
The central theme of Tourism Policy in <strong>Tanzania</strong> is quality tourism that<br />
means low volume of tourists and high yield of revenue. Furthermore,<br />
the policy has adopted the popular theme of UNWTO. However, there<br />
are two challenges facing the practicability of this policy:<br />
i) Measures to mitigate the free international tourism business<br />
to marry national tourism <strong>plan</strong>ning that takes care of both<br />
upper, and lower markets, and<br />
ii) Easy implementation of the ultimate goal of the quality<br />
tourism policy given the current trend of statistics of tourism.<br />
Tourism trend in <strong>Tanzania</strong> is as shown in Table 2.2 below.<br />
Table 2.2: Tourism Trend in <strong>Tanzania</strong> 2001 - 2005<br />
Year 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005<br />
International<br />
tourists<br />
525,000 575,235 576,198 582,807 612,754<br />
Tourists in Hotels 501,081 535,146 552,000 562,332 568,798<br />
Revenue (Million<br />
US $)<br />
Average tourists<br />
consumption per<br />
day (US $)<br />
725 730 731 746.14 822<br />
173 159 1 153 1 188 1 156 1<br />
82 2 82 2 119 2 125 2<br />
No. of tourist<br />
Hotels<br />
Occupancy rate<br />
per annum<br />
Source: MNRT Budget speech 2006/07<br />
329 465 469 469 476<br />
59 59 47 53 43<br />
1<br />
. Package tourists<br />
2<br />
. Non-package tourists
12<br />
2.4.3 TANAPA Initiatives<br />
a) Protection of Resources<br />
Protection of resources has been improved after implementation of the<br />
following activities:<br />
Deployment of more park rangers and distribution to various<br />
parks after training<br />
Acquisition of patrol and communication equipment<br />
Communities involvement through the intelligence services<br />
b) Expansion of <strong>National</strong> <strong>Parks</strong><br />
Kilimanjaro and Mount Meru Forest Reserves formerly under the<br />
Forestry and Beekeeping Division were successfully gazetted in 2005<br />
and were annexed to Kilimanjaro and Arusha <strong>National</strong> <strong>Parks</strong>,<br />
respectively. Efforts are underway to annex Usangu Game Reserve with<br />
Ruaha <strong>National</strong> Park, making it the largest national park in <strong>Tanzania</strong><br />
and one of the largest in Africa. The process initiated by the<br />
government aims at protecting the Ihefu wetland and the Great Ruaha<br />
River with associated catchment areas and biodiversity.<br />
c) Gazettement of New <strong>National</strong> <strong>Parks</strong><br />
Saadani and Kitulo <strong>National</strong> <strong>Parks</strong> were gazetted in 2005. The<br />
gazettement of the two parks is one of the success stories of the<br />
previous <strong>Corporate</strong> Plan (2001-2006). Two more national parks, namely<br />
Mkomazi and Saanane, will be added to the national parks system in<br />
the near future while the Speke Gulf will be annexed to Serengeti<br />
<strong>National</strong> Park. There is potential for Mt. Rungwe Forest to be annexed<br />
to Kitulo <strong>National</strong> Park.<br />
d) Tourism Development<br />
There has been a steady growth in nature-based tourism in national<br />
parks. Tourist attractions were diversified to enhance visitor experience.<br />
New products include walking safaris, canoeing, and night game drives.<br />
Old products such as game drives, ballooning, spot fishing,<br />
chimpanzee tracking and mountain climbing were progressively<br />
improved. The number of resident arrivals increased from 98,509 in
13<br />
2000/01 to 215,717 in 2004/05. Similarly, international arrivals<br />
increased from 220,910 in 2000/01 to 348,048 in 2004/05<br />
(see Figure 1 below).<br />
Figure 1: Number of Tourist Arrivals from 2000/01 to 2004/05<br />
e) Information and Communication Technology<br />
Information and communication technology was introduced in the<br />
organization in 2003. There is an intranet at the Head Office in Arusha.<br />
All the parks have internet services and will be linked to Head Office.<br />
Computerization, use of Global Positioning Systems (GPS) technology<br />
in the ranger force, veterinary and ecology units, and application of<br />
Geographical Information Systems (GIS) in park management is being<br />
pursued.<br />
Desktop publishing has taken off after training of core staff. The unit<br />
manages and undertakes numerous activities that were formerly<br />
contracted out. The institution will embark on comprehensive use of<br />
wide area network (WAN) as well as local area network (LAN) to<br />
facilitate its daily operations.<br />
f) Investments in <strong>National</strong> <strong>Parks</strong><br />
In order to enhance visitor enjoyment and experience, park and tourist
14<br />
facilities were continually constructed, maintained and improved.<br />
Tourist investments were constructed and old ones improved to meet<br />
the demand for accommodation inside the parks. Number of flights<br />
operated by the private sector also increased especially to northern<br />
parks.<br />
Construction of phase I & II of the Head Office complex in Arusha was<br />
completed during the implementation of the previous <strong>Corporate</strong><br />
Strategic Plan. The complex has been named after the late First<br />
President and Father of the Nation Mwalimu J.K. Nyerere in honour for<br />
his pioneering work on conservation as stated in the Arusha Manifesto.<br />
g) Management of Human Capital<br />
The personnel were streamlined according to the organization<br />
structure. The organization boasts of a workforce of over 1650 staff,<br />
though still inadequate. In its desire to maintain a team of qualified and<br />
motivated staff, training opportunities were provided, even though there<br />
was no comprehensive training programme. Recruitment of staff and<br />
promotions were effected to stimulate quality performance among staff<br />
in accordance to the scheme of service.<br />
h) Procurement of Goods and Services<br />
Procurement of working equipment and tools was undertaken based on<br />
the budgets and the Public Procurement Act of 2004 and its<br />
amendments.<br />
i) Working Environment<br />
So far, the organization has tried to improve the working<br />
environment in terms of remuneration and other fringe benefits such as<br />
group-endowment insurance scheme. However, given the working<br />
conditions in the national parks, the need for improvement of working<br />
incentives is still pertinent.<br />
j) Revenue Generation and Collection<br />
Within five years, the revenue generation trend has more than doubled<br />
(Figure 2). This trend is the basis for revenue forecast in the next five
15<br />
years. Computerization of accounts has been introduced and Points of<br />
Sales (POS) have been installed in some selected parks to improve<br />
revenue collection and controls.<br />
Figure 2: Revenue Trend<br />
2.5 SWOC Analysis (Organizational Scan)<br />
2.5.1 Strengths<br />
The Organization manages some of the most important<br />
exceptional and diverse natural areas in the world, including<br />
two World Heritage Sites (Serengeti and Kilimanjaro<br />
<strong>National</strong> <strong>Parks</strong>) and two Biosphere Reserves (Serengeti and<br />
Lake Manyara <strong>National</strong> <strong>Parks</strong>) with a potential of more<br />
being upgraded to such international categories.<br />
The institution continues to manage the areas designated as<br />
<strong>National</strong> <strong>Parks</strong> from its own funds with minimal dependency<br />
on external funding.<br />
Strong public support and political will in conservation<br />
matters has assisted the organization to effectively carry out<br />
its mandate such that <strong>National</strong> <strong>Parks</strong> are managed at the<br />
highest level of protection<br />
The inter-disciplinary <strong>plan</strong>ning process, which has been<br />
institutionalized in the organization, is a very useful tool to<br />
ensure that all-important aspects are considered in<br />
preparation of park General Management Plans.
16<br />
2.5.2 Weaknesses<br />
Lack of decentralized budget system delays implementation<br />
of various <strong>plan</strong>ned tasks.<br />
Lack of a monitoring and evaluation unit that is responsible<br />
for conducting systematic assessment of implementation of<br />
the CSP, management <strong>plan</strong> and corporate budgets have<br />
denied valuable feedback.<br />
The institution ability to meet its mandate has been largely<br />
dependent on a narrow and risky revenue base of tourism.<br />
Insufficient communication and information technology has<br />
slowed decision-making process and implementation of<br />
<strong>plan</strong>s across the organization.<br />
Inadequate professionals in some departments have affected<br />
efficiency and accountability.<br />
Inadequate human resource, equipment and infrastructure<br />
have reduced efficiency.<br />
Lack of a comprehensive incentive package for the staff has<br />
reduced motivation.<br />
Inadequate skills and knowledge denies creative ideas in the<br />
organization and proper human resource management styles.<br />
Inability of most parks to generate enough revenues to meet<br />
their operational costs.<br />
Slow pace in adapting management of change<br />
(sticking to ‘mental models’) has delayed institutional<br />
development.<br />
2.5.3 Opportunities<br />
Growing tourism industry and diversification of tourism<br />
products will enhance implementation of the institution<br />
mandate.<br />
Public – private- community partnerships will enhance<br />
synergy.<br />
Political stability and support will ensure sustainability<br />
Favourable national policies and legislatives framework will<br />
improve working environment.<br />
International support will enhance the conservation efforts of<br />
the organization.<br />
There are potential investments to generate revenue other<br />
than tourism.
17<br />
2.5.4 Challenges<br />
Rapid human population increase in the areas adjacent to<br />
<strong>National</strong> <strong>Parks</strong> means increased human-wildlife conflicts and<br />
poaching.<br />
Political interventions may derail the implementation of the<br />
CSP.<br />
Lack of integrated <strong>plan</strong>ning with surrounding districts could<br />
lead to land use conflicts between stakeholders and parks.<br />
International terrorism.<br />
Disease outbreaks such as bird flu could affect tourist’s<br />
arrivals.<br />
Natural disasters may affect the tourism industry and<br />
conservation endeavors.<br />
2.5.5 Problem Analysis<br />
1. Resources<br />
The organization is faced with limited resources in terms of human,<br />
financial and physical resources to implement the set conservation and<br />
development goals. Additionally, the sources of revenue are dependent<br />
only on tourism revenues, something that is dangerous as tourism is a<br />
fragile business. The revenue base has to be expanded to sustainably<br />
fund conservation efforts of national parks spread in the whole country.<br />
2. Organizational Culture<br />
Basically, organizational culture is the personality of the organization.<br />
Culture is comprised of the assumptions, values, norms and signs<br />
(artifacts) of organization members and their behaviours. The concept<br />
of culture is particularly important when attempting to manage<br />
organization – wide change. The organization must realize that, despite<br />
the best laid <strong>plan</strong>s, organizational change must include not only<br />
changing structures and processes, but also changing the corporate<br />
culture as well. The institution has been operating based on the<br />
traditional way of doing business. This situation has led to delayed<br />
adoption of new changes especially in the use of appropriate<br />
technology and modern conservation ethos. A new culture to do<br />
business in the organization is wanting.
18<br />
3. Employee Competence<br />
Core competencies are not adequately defined for all job categories and<br />
such jobs are not periodically reviewed and designed to respond to<br />
organizational needs so that staff are recruited with required skills and<br />
competencies. The existing scheme of service does not lead to<br />
achievement of staff competencies.<br />
4. Employee Attitudes<br />
Understandably, employees can perceive and respond to events around<br />
them as their choice. Positive employee attitudes create positive actions<br />
toward organizational goals. Coping with the continuous changes that<br />
do not favour staff, leaves many people confused, fearful and<br />
sometimes angry. As attitudes deteriorate, so do commitment, loyalty<br />
and, most importantly, performance. Therefore it is critical to turn<br />
passive resistance into high – energy performance by establishing<br />
personal responsibility and accountability in the midst of change.<br />
5. Tasks and Processes<br />
Planned tasks in the organization are usually undertaken after<br />
completion of bureaucratic processes that sometimes take time. Where<br />
processes are simpler then tasks are performed effectively and<br />
efficiently. Bureaucratic processes within the organization have<br />
sometimes delayed and resulted into unfinished tasks.<br />
6. People Management Styles<br />
People are the only sustainable competitive advantage in the<br />
organization. Many managers have not attended people management<br />
courses that various and different management styles are practiced in<br />
the institution. Due to lack of a unified management style, complaints<br />
have been recorded from different personnel both from the parks and<br />
the Head Office. The managers have paramount obligations to ensure<br />
that all necessary resources are provided - including the employee’s<br />
skills, information, other people, equipment, funds, authority and time.<br />
Moreover, the focus must stay firmly on performance – with clear<br />
standards or guidelines by which you will evaluate performance – what<br />
you consider important and how much you expect – including ethical
19<br />
standards. It is important therefore for the management to attend<br />
regular training on human resource management and practice the<br />
knowledge imparted on them.<br />
7. Organization Situation<br />
Strategic <strong>plan</strong>ning must include organization’s environment because no<br />
organization operates in a vacuum. The very definition of strategic<br />
<strong>plan</strong>ning stresses the importance of focusing on the future within the<br />
context of an ever- changing environment – the myriad of political,<br />
economic, social, technological, demographic and legal forces that<br />
change our world daily. Since the institution does not conduct a<br />
situational assessment annually, there is a need to use SWOC analysis<br />
technique to get perceptions of the organization from both internal and<br />
external stakeholders. The results will add valuable information to<br />
situation assessment.
20<br />
2.6 Stakeholder/Customer Analysis<br />
There are different stakeholders and customers who affect<br />
organizational operations in a number of ways. It is therefore important<br />
to carry out an analysis in order to ensure that their interests and<br />
expectations are met during the preparation of this CSP.<br />
Stakeholder<br />
Group<br />
1. Ngorongoro<br />
Conservation<br />
Area Authority<br />
2. Wildlife Division,<br />
Forestry and<br />
Beekeeping<br />
Department,<br />
Fisheries<br />
Department,<br />
Antiquities<br />
Department<br />
Expectations From<br />
TANAPA By<br />
stakeholder<br />
Enhanced<br />
collaboration<br />
Conservation Policies<br />
appropriately<br />
implemented<br />
Expectations By<br />
TANAPA From<br />
stakeholder<br />
Enhanced<br />
collaboration<br />
Up to date<br />
conservation Acts<br />
and policies<br />
How to Engage<br />
Consultative fora to<br />
discuss issues of<br />
mutual interest<br />
Collaborate and<br />
cooperate in<br />
formulating policies<br />
Exchange experiences<br />
in conservation and<br />
tourism related<br />
matters<br />
3. Board of Trustees TANAPA capacity<br />
improved and<br />
continue to prosper<br />
in carrying out its<br />
mandate<br />
Board decisions are<br />
in line with the CSP<br />
Board decisions are<br />
in line with<br />
government policies,<br />
directives and the<br />
approved CSP<br />
4. TAWIRI, TAFIRI,<br />
TAFORI,<br />
Researchers in<br />
PAs<br />
Research<br />
opportunities availed<br />
Research findings<br />
support<br />
conservation<br />
activities<br />
Consultative fora<br />
5. Training<br />
Institutions<br />
(Mweka, Pasiansi,<br />
Sokoine<br />
University (SUA),<br />
University of<br />
Dar es salaam<br />
(UDSM)<br />
<strong>National</strong> <strong>Parks</strong><br />
provide students for<br />
the training<br />
institutions. <strong>Parks</strong><br />
continue as research<br />
grounds and provide<br />
field attachment<br />
experience<br />
The organization gets Consultations and<br />
qualified and feedback mechanisms<br />
competent employees<br />
and consultation<br />
services.<br />
6. NGOs: WWF,<br />
AWF, FZS, WCS,<br />
WCST, OIKOS,<br />
IUCN, CITES<br />
Participation in<br />
conservation and<br />
development efforts<br />
Support and<br />
complement<br />
institution<br />
conservation efforts<br />
Terms and conditions<br />
for collaboration
21<br />
7. Lusaka<br />
Agreement Task<br />
Force<br />
Collaborative efforts<br />
in curbing cross<br />
boundary illegal<br />
trafficking of wildlife<br />
resources<br />
Illegal trafficking of<br />
wildlife resources are<br />
significantly reduced<br />
Consultative<br />
<strong>plan</strong>ning and<br />
feedback mechanism<br />
8. Development<br />
Partners: GTZ,<br />
USAID, DFID,<br />
NORAD, UNDP,<br />
UNEP, UNESCO,<br />
DANIDA, JICA, EU,<br />
UNICEF<br />
Support<br />
Support and<br />
provided for complement<br />
conservation produce conservation efforts<br />
expected results<br />
Terms and conditions<br />
for collaboration<br />
9. Local<br />
communities<br />
adjacent to<br />
national parks<br />
Realize benefits from<br />
conservation<br />
Communities<br />
continue to use<br />
indigenous<br />
knowledge and other<br />
conventional means<br />
to support<br />
conservation efforts<br />
Reciprocal action<br />
programme<br />
10. Institutional staff Improved working<br />
and living conditions<br />
11. International<br />
community<br />
The <strong>Parks</strong> are<br />
conserved for the<br />
benefit of present and<br />
future generations of<br />
mankind<br />
Institutional staff<br />
enable the organization<br />
to achieve her<br />
vision and mission<br />
International<br />
community to<br />
support conservation<br />
efforts<br />
Enforcement of<br />
contractual<br />
obligations and<br />
performance<br />
agreements<br />
Collaborative<br />
synergy<br />
arrangements<br />
12. Treasury Institution is<br />
financially self<br />
sufficient and<br />
contributes in the<br />
conservation and<br />
development efforts<br />
All revenues accrued<br />
from tourism and<br />
other sources<br />
ploughed back to<br />
support<br />
conservation and<br />
development of the<br />
national parks<br />
Retention scheme<br />
13. Investors, Tour<br />
Operators,<br />
Business<br />
Community<br />
Good infrastructure,<br />
safety, and amicable<br />
relations<br />
Promote parks, viable<br />
investments, quality<br />
services and conform<br />
to park rules and<br />
regulations<br />
Consultative<br />
feedback fora
14. TTB Institution continues<br />
to improve visitor<br />
TTB continues to<br />
promote <strong>National</strong><br />
products and services <strong>Parks</strong> locally and<br />
in national parks internationally<br />
Consultative fora for<br />
sharing information<br />
and leveraging<br />
marketing efforts<br />
15. Travel<br />
agencies/airline<br />
<strong>Parks</strong> are reliable and<br />
safe destinations<br />
16. TATO Customer care and<br />
programmes in<br />
services in national<br />
parks meet visitors<br />
expectations<br />
17. AICC Conference tourists<br />
expectations in<br />
national parks met<br />
18. Law Enforcement<br />
Institutions<br />
19. Local and Central<br />
Governments<br />
20. Guides and<br />
Porters in<br />
mountain parks<br />
Manage the national<br />
parks in accordance<br />
to the Ordinance Cap<br />
412 of 1959 and its<br />
amendments<br />
Institution provides<br />
employment,<br />
generates revenues<br />
and conserves<br />
biodiversity<br />
21. Politicians Institution provides<br />
employment,<br />
generates revenues<br />
and support<br />
communities<br />
22. Traditional<br />
Religious Groups<br />
23. Financial<br />
Institutions<br />
More tourists are<br />
facilitated to visit the<br />
<strong>Parks</strong><br />
Consultative fora for<br />
sharing information<br />
Adherence to rules Consultation and<br />
and regulations in the continuous sharing of<br />
parks<br />
information<br />
Integration of<br />
conference packages<br />
with park visits.<br />
Law enforcement<br />
Institutions to speed<br />
up wildlife related<br />
court cases<br />
Institution continue Porters and guides<br />
to provide opportunities<br />
for local services to visitors<br />
offer excellent<br />
employment<br />
Permitted to carry<br />
out traditional<br />
worship in the parks<br />
Institution continue<br />
to use financial services<br />
Agreement for<br />
cooperation<br />
Consultative fora<br />
Ensured conducive Integration of<br />
environment in terms corporate social<br />
of policy and political responsibility and<br />
will<br />
outreach<br />
programmes into<br />
district development<br />
<strong>plan</strong>s<br />
Ensured political<br />
support at all levels<br />
Traditional<br />
knowledge to<br />
enhance<br />
conservation efforts<br />
Excellent financial<br />
services and<br />
consultation<br />
Contractual<br />
arrangement for<br />
service delivery<br />
Consultative fora for<br />
information sharing<br />
Consultative<br />
information sharing<br />
promoted<br />
Contractual<br />
arrangement<br />
22
The following groups affect institutional operations negatively:<br />
Group<br />
Expectations from<br />
TANAPA by the group<br />
1. Poachers They are not arrested and<br />
desire that wildlife will<br />
always be available for their<br />
use<br />
2. Bandits Illegally acquired wealth<br />
from tourists<br />
3. Wildlife traffickers Illegally acquired wealth<br />
from wildlife<br />
Expectations By<br />
TANAPA From<br />
Stakeholders<br />
Poachers reformed through<br />
awareness<br />
creation and support<br />
conservation efforts<br />
Bandits are controlled in collaboration<br />
with Law<br />
Enforcement Institutions and<br />
enhance visitors<br />
safety and experience<br />
Incidences of illegal<br />
trafficking of wildlife<br />
resources is significantly<br />
reduced<br />
4. Business Competitors Maintain monopoly Competition improves<br />
services provided to<br />
Institutional customers<br />
5. Farmers and<br />
inhabitants<br />
Maintain status quo<br />
Wildlife corridors and<br />
dispersal areas are opened<br />
6. Miners Maintain status quo Miners (outside the parks)<br />
adhere to environmental<br />
standards and procedures<br />
23
24<br />
Customers Groups<br />
2.7 Critical Issues<br />
Expectations from<br />
TANAPA by Customers<br />
Expectations<br />
by TANAPA from<br />
Customers<br />
1. Tourists Value for money Revenue generation and<br />
continue visiting our parks<br />
but adhere to rules and<br />
regulations<br />
2. Institution Employees Better working and living<br />
conditions<br />
3. Tour operators and<br />
investors, Business<br />
community,<br />
Concessionaires<br />
4. Financial Institutions<br />
(banks)<br />
5. Service Providers (TTCL,<br />
TANESCO, Water and<br />
sewerage)<br />
Good infrastructure, safety,<br />
and amicable relations<br />
Institution continue to use<br />
financial services<br />
Institution continue to use<br />
the service providers<br />
6. Media groups Institution provides reliable<br />
and relevant information to<br />
the public through the media<br />
7. Local Communities Livelihoods of the adjacent<br />
communities improved<br />
through tourism ventures<br />
8. General Public <strong>Parks</strong> are conserved as<br />
<strong>National</strong> Heritage sites for<br />
the present and future<br />
generations<br />
1. Inadequate institutional capacity to operate effectively and<br />
efficiently<br />
Underutilization of modern technology and equipment<br />
Insufficient staff training and motivation<br />
Inadequate staff and working equipment<br />
Insufficient staff and office accommodation<br />
Institution staff enable the<br />
organization to achieve her<br />
vision and mission<br />
Promote parks, viable<br />
investments, quality services<br />
and conform to park rules<br />
and regulations<br />
Excellent financial services<br />
and consultation<br />
Reliable and quality services<br />
provided<br />
Media groups support<br />
Institution efforts by<br />
enhancing public awareness<br />
on biodiversity conservation<br />
The adjacent communities<br />
become active allies in<br />
conservation and<br />
development efforts<br />
The general public supports<br />
conservation of national<br />
parks for present and future<br />
generations
25<br />
<br />
<br />
Inappropriate schemes of service and staff establishment<br />
High organization structure<br />
2. Inadequate staff welfare programmes<br />
HIV/AIDS prevalence<br />
No specific training programmes on HIV/AIDS and other<br />
infectious diseases<br />
Inadequate medical staff and services<br />
Inadequate staff recreation facilities<br />
Inadequate staff education and health facilities.<br />
3. Ineffective conservation of ecosystems in areas designated as<br />
national parks<br />
Islandisation due to external pressures<br />
Poaching<br />
Human-wildlife conflicts<br />
Global climatic changes<br />
Shortage of water supply to wildlife in some parks<br />
Wildfires and diseases<br />
Inappropriate waste management<br />
4. Organization revenue generation potential not fully realized<br />
Inadequate tourism development for enhancing visitor’s<br />
experience<br />
Inadequate revenue avenues and collection system<br />
Inadequate diversification of tourists products<br />
Inadequate numbers and quality of tourism investments in<br />
parks<br />
Inadequate aggressive marketing locally and internationally<br />
(electronic media)<br />
Inadequate Information Visitor Centres<br />
Ineffective management of external pressures<br />
5. Passive involvement/participation of stakeholders in conservation<br />
of parks<br />
Weak relations between national parks and adjacent<br />
communities<br />
Weak linkage between community development projects to<br />
conservation<br />
Inadequate benefit sharing mechanism assistance to enable
26<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
adjacent communities to establish own initiatives.<br />
No investment partnerships between the organization and<br />
adjacent communities<br />
No established mechanisms for involving communities in<br />
conservation to enable them get user-rights<br />
Unfavorable coexistence between national parks and other<br />
stakeholders in conservation of parks<br />
6. Inadequate infrastructure to achieve organization’s set<br />
conservation goals<br />
Improperly developed access roads, airstrips and signage<br />
Adhoc housing programmes and constructed without<br />
approved standards<br />
Insufficient maintenance programme<br />
Inadequate and low quality staff housing<br />
7. Ineffective management of programmes and <strong>plan</strong>s<br />
Inadequate coordination in the preparation and<br />
implementation of programmes and <strong>plan</strong>s at all levels<br />
Failure to link the CSP and GMPs<br />
Weak adherence to guidelines, procedures and rules during<br />
implementation of <strong>plan</strong>s<br />
Inadequate monitoring and evaluation<br />
2.8 Strategic Core Functions<br />
This CSP recognizes the roles and strategic core functions of the Board<br />
of Trustees, Director General and directors for the effective<br />
implementation of this <strong>plan</strong>.<br />
2.8.1 Role of Board of Trustees<br />
To set policies and programmes for efficient and effective<br />
management of the organization; and to provide an oversight role in the<br />
management and approve policies in line with recommendations<br />
provided by the management, headed by the Director General, and<br />
relevant government organs.
27<br />
2.8.2 Role of the Director General<br />
Provide strategic direction and visionary leadership; coordinate the<br />
implementation of all activities of the institution in line with policies<br />
approved by the Board of Trustees, and with the following key<br />
functional mandates in the office:<br />
<br />
<br />
General management<br />
Ensure that the institution conserves wildlife in all<br />
national parks<br />
2.8.3 Role of the Directors<br />
Director of Conservation and <strong>Parks</strong> Operations<br />
Direct security functions in the institution activities and<br />
make appropriate recommendations thereon to the Board of<br />
Trustees, Director General and managers<br />
Work closely with other directors and security agencies<br />
to ensure that wildlife is conserved, protected and managed<br />
properly<br />
Develop biodiversity research and monitoring priorities,<br />
collaborate with scientific and research institutions<br />
Direct community conservation activities in all<br />
national parks<br />
Oversee operations in the parks<br />
Director of Human Resources and Administration<br />
Provide corporate support services in the organization,<br />
general office administration and estates management<br />
Provide human recourses management services<br />
Develop human resources management <strong>plan</strong>s, policies,<br />
regulations, procedures and guidelines regarding recruitment,<br />
training, and staff welfare<br />
Handling of industrial relations matters regarding labour<br />
disputes and disciplinary issues
28<br />
Director of Planning and Tourism Development<br />
Direct preparations, reviews and implementation of general<br />
management <strong>plan</strong>s in the organization<br />
Direct tourism development, marketing and customer<br />
services<br />
Direct coordination, monitoring and evaluation of<br />
implementation efforts<br />
Director of Finance<br />
Ensure that the financial stability of the institution is<br />
achieved and that appropriate controls exist to safeguard the<br />
assets and resources<br />
Ensure timely allocation of financial resources to<br />
user centres<br />
Ensure preparation of corporate budget and its<br />
implementation<br />
Chief Park Wardens<br />
Facilitate implementation of the CSP at parks level<br />
Implement the GMPs<br />
Other corporate support services<br />
- Internal Audit<br />
Overall risk-management policy<br />
Carry out management audits to ensure effective utilization<br />
of institution’s resources<br />
Ensure that operations are timely accomplished within the<br />
budget timeframes<br />
Advise management on proper controls<br />
-Legal Services<br />
Advise Board of Trustees and the management on all legal<br />
matters affecting the institution<br />
- <strong>Corporate</strong> Communications<br />
To establish, maintain and project the TANAPA’s corporate<br />
image and identity.
29<br />
CHAPTER THREE: THE PLAN<br />
3.1 Core Values<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Accountable organization managing national parks<br />
sustainably<br />
Innovative and highly organized institution in providing<br />
high quality services<br />
Efficient in deploying resources to exceed customer<br />
expectations<br />
3.2. Vision Statement<br />
To be the highest globally rated institution in sustainable conservation<br />
and provision of exceptional tourism services.<br />
3.3. Mission Statement<br />
Our mission is to sustainably conserve and manage park resources and<br />
their aesthetic values, for the benefit of present and future generations<br />
of mankind, as well as efficiently provide high class tourism products<br />
and services.<br />
3.4. Strategic Objectives<br />
SO 1: Institutional capacity to operate effectively and efficiently<br />
fully developed<br />
Institutional capacity building is essential in providing staff with<br />
technical or material assistance designed to strengthen one or more<br />
elements of organisational effectiveness. The elements of effectiveness<br />
include good governance, management capacity, human resources,<br />
financial resources, service delivery, external relations, and<br />
sustainability. The goal of institutional capacity building is to<br />
strengthen the organisation in terms of its overall sustainability. ICT<br />
capacity within the organization is in dire need.
30<br />
SO 2: Staff welfare and benefits improved<br />
Staff welfare is very important in ensuring wellbeing of institutional<br />
staff. It also motivates staff and hence performance improvement. That<br />
being the case, it is very important to ensure that staff welfare issues<br />
are well addressed by ensuring that proper medical services to combat<br />
HIV/AIDS and other infectious diseases are provided to staff and their<br />
families. A competitive incentive package will be developed to attract<br />
and retain staff of required calibers, taking into account issues of<br />
gender balance. Staff recreational, education and health facilities will<br />
be improved in parks and Head Office.<br />
SO 3: <strong>National</strong> <strong>Parks</strong> biodiversity and their adjacent ecosystems<br />
effectively conserved<br />
The organization will ensure that all ecosystems are effectively<br />
represented in the national park system. Major issues that will be<br />
addressed include the opening of some corridors and dispersal areas<br />
and to reduce external pressures on parks; control illegal utilization of<br />
natural resources, wildfires, transmission of diseases and water sources.<br />
Other issues will include adaptive management through research and<br />
monitoring. Investments in the parks will be regulated and EIA studies<br />
conducted to minimize waste and pollution due to human activities.<br />
SO 4: Organization’s potential for income generation fully realized<br />
In order to accomplish corporate objectives the current and future<br />
operations must be adequately financed. Therefore various strategies<br />
need to be in place to increase and control revenue to match with<br />
increased operational costs. The strategies should include but not<br />
limited to broadening sources of revenue - by diversifying tourist<br />
products, investing in tourism and non - tourism ventures and tourism<br />
promotion. Revenue control mechanism will also be improved.<br />
SO 5: Organizational partnerships with adjacent communities and<br />
key stakeholders in the management of parks and buffer zone<br />
resources improved<br />
The organization will improve relations with the adjacent local<br />
communities and other key stakeholders by actively contributing
31<br />
towards reduction of poverty through <strong>National</strong> Strategy for Growth and<br />
Reduction of Poverty (MKUKUTA) and will encourage appropriate<br />
benefit sharing mechanisms. Where appropriate, the institution will<br />
initiate investment partnerships with the private sector and communities<br />
to improve viable livelihood options. The organization will also<br />
encourage and facilitate the establishment of WMAs outside park areas<br />
to enable communities secure user-rights and actively participate in<br />
conservation efforts of wildlife resources. Efforts will also be made to<br />
minimize human – wildlife conflicts in order to improve working<br />
relations with key stakeholders.<br />
SO 6: Infrastructure to achieve institutional conservation<br />
development goals developed and maintained<br />
For the organization to achieve its conservation development goals, the<br />
issue of quality infrastructure in national parks will be highly<br />
considered. This is due to the fact that without proper infrastructure,<br />
staff would not discharge their duties efficiently and effectively. During<br />
the implementation of this CSP, the organization will set aside enough<br />
resources for maintenance and development of access roads, airstrips,<br />
adequate staff houses, offices, control gates and visitor information<br />
centres.<br />
SO 7: Mechanisms and systems for management of programmes<br />
and <strong>plan</strong>s improved<br />
In order for the institution to achieve its objectives, it is important to<br />
ensure that programmes and <strong>plan</strong>s are well prepared and implemented.<br />
To achieve this, the organization will strengthen the <strong>plan</strong>ning functions<br />
at different levels of the organization. At the Head Office, the Planning<br />
and Development Projects Department will be strengthened by<br />
establishing a Monitoring and Evaluation section with a responsibility<br />
of carrying out systematic assessment of all the programmes and <strong>plan</strong>s<br />
to ensure that the organizational objectives are met. During the<br />
implementation of this CSP, emphasis will be placed on improving<br />
coordination, training, monitoring and evaluation.
CHAPTER FOUR: STRATEGIES AND TARGETS<br />
SO 1: Institutional capacity to operate effectively and efficiently<br />
fully developed<br />
Institutional capacity building is essential in providing staff with<br />
technical or material assistance designed to strengthen one or more<br />
elements of organisational effectiveness. The elements of effectiveness<br />
include good governance, management capacity, human resources,<br />
financial resources, service delivery, external relations and<br />
sustainablity. The goal of institutional capacity building is to<br />
strengthen the organization in terms of its overall sustainability. ICT<br />
application is not yet fully institutionalized in the organization.<br />
In view of the above, the institution will deploy a number of strategies<br />
with their corresponding targets outlined in the table below:<br />
Table 4.1: Strategies and Targets<br />
Strategies<br />
1.1: Train staff<br />
1.2: Restructure<br />
1.3: Retool<br />
Targets<br />
1.1.1: A comprehensive training programme<br />
developed and in place by December 2008<br />
1.1.2: The approved training programme<br />
implemented by 80% by June 2013<br />
1.1.3: 5 Directors and 26 Managers trained on<br />
basic management skills by June 2009<br />
1.2.1: Review and implement organization<br />
structure by December 2008<br />
1.2.2: Staff establishment, scheme of service and<br />
salary structure reviewed and operationalized<br />
by December 2009<br />
1.2.3: Staff regulations reviewed to conform with<br />
Employment and Labour Relations Act, 2004 by<br />
June 2009<br />
1.3.1: Retooling <strong>plan</strong> developed and approved<br />
by December 2008<br />
1.3.2: Retooling <strong>plan</strong> implemented by 75% by<br />
June 2013<br />
32
1.4: Recruit to fill<br />
established posts<br />
1.5: Develop and<br />
implement ICT<br />
programme<br />
1.6: Mainstream gender<br />
issues<br />
1.4.1: HR recruitment <strong>plan</strong> developed and<br />
approved by December 2008<br />
1.5.1: A comprehensive ICT programme in<br />
TANAPA operations fully developed by June<br />
2009<br />
1.6.1: Gender balance improved by June 2010<br />
1.6.2: Qualified disadvantaged candidates given<br />
priority during recruitment by June 2013<br />
SO 2: Staff welfare and benefits improved<br />
Currently, staff welfare and benefits are not optimally met; hence there<br />
is low staff morale in most parks. Medical services, recreational<br />
facilities and incentive packages are areas that need improvement.<br />
In view of the above, the organization will deploy a number of<br />
strategies with their corresponding targets outlined in the table below:<br />
Table 4.2: Strategies and Targets<br />
Strategies<br />
2.1: Review<br />
incentive/benefits<br />
package<br />
2.2: Improve social<br />
amenities<br />
Targets<br />
2.1.1: Competitive incentive/benefits package<br />
developed and approved by March 2009<br />
2.2.1: Adequate medical staff and facilities<br />
provided to each park by 2013<br />
2.3: Implement<br />
HIV/AIDS programme<br />
2.2.2: Each staff children residing in parks have<br />
access to nursery and primary education by June<br />
2013<br />
2.2.3: Each park to have functional recreational<br />
centres by June 2011<br />
2.3.1: HIV/AIDS programme developed and<br />
operational by June 2009<br />
33
SO 3: <strong>National</strong> <strong>Parks</strong> biodiversity and their adjacent ecosystems<br />
effectively conserved<br />
Ecosystems management is a core function of the organizational<br />
mandate. However, ecosystems are facing serious threats such as<br />
corridors and dispersal areas shrinkage due to increased human<br />
activities and poaching. Furthermore, biodiversity is threatened by<br />
transmission of diseases between human – wildlife - livestock<br />
interactions and wildfires. Water shortage is a chronic problem for<br />
human, livestock and wildlife in most parks and adjacent areas. This<br />
resource is continuously on the decrease.<br />
In view of the above, the institution will deploy a number of strategies<br />
with their corresponding targets outlined in the table below:<br />
Table 4.3: Strategies and Targets<br />
Strategies<br />
3.1: Make decisions<br />
based on researched<br />
information<br />
3.2: Develop <strong>Parks</strong><br />
System Plan<br />
3.3: Develop water use<br />
guidelines<br />
3.4: Improve park<br />
resources protection<br />
system<br />
Targets<br />
3.1.1: Research and ecological monitoring<br />
programme reviewed and operational by June<br />
2009<br />
3.1.2: Animal disease investigation and control<br />
programme reviewed and operational by June<br />
2009<br />
3.2.1: Key ecosystems are represented in the<br />
national park network by June 2013<br />
3.2.2: Key wildlife corridors/dispersal areas<br />
secured by June 2013<br />
3.3.1: Water development and management<br />
scheme developed and operational for 15 parks<br />
by June 2013<br />
3.4.1: A comprehensive law enforcement<br />
programme developed and operational by<br />
December 2009<br />
3.4.2: <strong>National</strong> Park Ordinance reviewed in<br />
accordance with the Wildlife Conservation Act<br />
by June 2010<br />
3.4.3: Trans- boundary collaboration mechanism<br />
developed and in use by December 2008<br />
34
3.4.4: Participatory policy and management<br />
decisions made annually<br />
3.5: Implement waste<br />
management <strong>plan</strong><br />
3.5.1: Waste management <strong>plan</strong> reviewed and<br />
operational by June 2010<br />
SO 4: Organization’s potential for income generation fully realized<br />
For years, the organization main source of revenue has been dependent<br />
on traditional tourism products. Therefore new strategies for<br />
broadening sources of revenue are required such as diversifying tourist<br />
products, investing in tourism and non - tourism ventures.<br />
In view of the above, the institution will deploy a number of strategies<br />
with their corresponding targets outlined in the table below:<br />
Table 4.4: Strategies and Targets<br />
Strategies<br />
4.1: Diversify and<br />
effectively promote<br />
tourism products and<br />
services<br />
Targets<br />
4.1.1: Tourism marketing strategy reviewed and<br />
implemented by June 2009<br />
4.1.2: New tourism products developed and<br />
introduced by June 2009<br />
4.1.3: Collaboration with key stakeholders<br />
strengthened and implemented by 2013<br />
4.1.4: Develop and implement tourism<br />
investment policy (to guide private investments)<br />
by December 2008<br />
4.2: Invest in tourism<br />
and non-tourism<br />
ventures<br />
4.3: Improve finance<br />
controls<br />
4.2.1: Develop and implement investment<br />
business <strong>plan</strong> by June 2009<br />
4.3.1: An effective and efficient system for<br />
controlling income and expenditure improved<br />
and operational by June 2010<br />
35
SO 5: Organizational partnerships with adjacent communities and<br />
key stakeholders in the management of parks and buffer zone<br />
resources improved<br />
The organizational working relationships with adjacent local<br />
communities and other key stakeholders are weak. The institution also<br />
does not have a proper strategy to contribute towards reduction of<br />
poverty through <strong>National</strong> Strategy for Growth and Reduction of<br />
Poverty (MKUKUTA) as well as appropriate benefit sharing mechanisms.<br />
Furthermore, the institution does not have effective partnerships<br />
with the private sector and communities to improve community<br />
livelihood options. Human – wildlife conflicts have not been properly<br />
addressed thereby threatening working relations with key stakeholders.<br />
In view of the above, the institution will deploy a number of strategies<br />
with their corresponding targets outlined in the table below:<br />
Table 4.5: Strategies and Targets<br />
Strategies<br />
5.1: Improve working<br />
relations<br />
5.2: Contribute towards<br />
poverty reduction<br />
5.3: Establish<br />
partnerships<br />
5.4: Minimize<br />
human-wildlife<br />
conflicts<br />
36<br />
Targets<br />
5.1.1: Conservation education programme<br />
reviewed and operational by December 2008<br />
5.1.2: Modalities for continued dialogue with<br />
local communities and other key stakeholders<br />
reviewed and operationalized by December 2008<br />
5.2.1: System for contribution to poverty<br />
reduction in adjacent communities developed<br />
and operational by December 2008<br />
5.2.2: Benefit sharing mechanisms reviewed and<br />
implemented by June 2009<br />
5.3.1: Public-Private-Community Partnerships<br />
guidelines developed and operational by June<br />
2009<br />
5.4.1: Conflict resolution mechanisms developed<br />
and operational by December 2009<br />
5.4.2: 15 national parks boundaries demarcated<br />
and marked by June 2013<br />
5.4.3: Problem animals control programme<br />
developed and operational by June 2009
37<br />
SO 6: Infrastructure to achieve institutional conservation<br />
development goals developed and maintained<br />
The institution has inadequate and substandard infrastructure in most<br />
national parks. The organization has not been setting aside enough<br />
resources for maintenance and development of access roads, airstrips,<br />
staff houses, offices, control gates and visitor information centres. As a<br />
result, staff do not discharge their duties efficiently and effectively.<br />
In view of the above, the institution will deploy a number of strategies<br />
with their corresponding targets outlined in the table below:<br />
Table 4.6: Strategies and Targets<br />
Strategies<br />
6.1: Improve and<br />
develop infrastructure<br />
6.2: Enforce EIA in<br />
every physical<br />
development activity<br />
Targets<br />
6.1.1: A development and maintenance<br />
programme for road networks, airstrips, staff<br />
housing, offices, visitor centres and control gates<br />
prepared and operationalized by December 2008<br />
6.2.1: EIA and PEA guidelines reviewed and<br />
operational by June 2009<br />
SO 7: Management and implementation of programmes and <strong>plan</strong>s<br />
improved<br />
Programmes and <strong>plan</strong>s are not well implemented and managed<br />
therefore the institution does not effectively achieve its objectives.<br />
Weak coordination has been noted in the <strong>plan</strong>ning functions at different<br />
levels of the organization, monitoring and evaluation.<br />
In view of the above, the institution will deploy a number of strategies<br />
with their corresponding targets outlined in the table below:
Table 4.7: Strategies and Targets<br />
Strategies<br />
7.1: Install performance<br />
management system<br />
(PMS)<br />
Targets<br />
7.1.1: Policy guidelines for <strong>plan</strong>ning and implementation<br />
of all programmes and <strong>plan</strong>s developed<br />
and operational by June 2009<br />
7.1.2: Existing GMP <strong>plan</strong>ning guidelines are<br />
updated by June 2009<br />
7.1.3: 15 parks are managed according to<br />
approved GMPs by June 2013<br />
7.1.4: Approved CSP mid term externally<br />
reviewed and evaluated by June 2011<br />
7.1.5: Staff open performance appraisal system<br />
introduced and institutionalized by June 2009<br />
7.1.6: Local and international obligations to<br />
improve resource protection met annually<br />
7.2: Institute monitoring<br />
and evaluation<br />
7.2.1: Monitoring and Evaluation Unit established by<br />
June 2009<br />
7.2.2: Monitoring and Evaluation manual developed<br />
and implemented by June 2009<br />
38
40<br />
ANNEX 2: PBF- 4.1 – SUMMARY OF THE CSP<br />
Institution Name: <strong>Tanzania</strong> <strong>National</strong> <strong>Parks</strong> (TANAPA)<br />
Period Covered: From Financial Year 2008/09 to the Financial Year<br />
2012/13<br />
Mission:<br />
Our mission is to sustainably conserve and manage park resources and<br />
their aesthetic values, for the benefit of present and future generations<br />
of mankind, as well as efficiently provide high class tourism products<br />
and services.<br />
Vision:<br />
To be the highest globally rated institution in sustainable conservation<br />
of national parks resources and provision of exceptional tourism<br />
products.<br />
Core values:<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Accountable organization managing national parks<br />
sustainably<br />
Innovative and highly organized institution in providing<br />
high quality services<br />
Efficient in deploying resources to exceed customer<br />
expectations
Key Performance<br />
Indicators<br />
Objective<br />
High service<br />
delivery standards<br />
Improvement in<br />
corporate<br />
productivity<br />
Reduced<br />
operational costs<br />
Strategy Target Functional<br />
Responsibility<br />
1.1: Train staff 1.1.1: A comprehensive<br />
training programme<br />
developed and in place by<br />
December 2008<br />
Human Resources<br />
1.1.2: The approved training<br />
programme implemented by<br />
80% by June 2013<br />
Human Resources<br />
1.1.3: 5 Directors and 26<br />
managers trained on basic<br />
management skills by June<br />
2009<br />
Human Resources<br />
1.2: Restructure 1.2.1: Review and implement<br />
organization structure by<br />
December 2008<br />
Human Resources<br />
1.2.2: Staff establishment,<br />
schemes of service and salary<br />
structure reviewed and<br />
operational by December 2009<br />
Human Resources<br />
1.2.3: Staff regulations<br />
reviewed by December 2008<br />
SO 1:<br />
Institutional<br />
capacity to<br />
operate<br />
effectively<br />
and<br />
efficiently<br />
fully<br />
developed<br />
Human Resources<br />
41
42<br />
Objective<br />
Key Performance<br />
Indicators<br />
Strategy Target Functional<br />
Responsibility<br />
1.3: Retool 1.3.1: Retooling <strong>plan</strong><br />
developed and approved by<br />
December 2008<br />
1.3.2: Retooling <strong>plan</strong> implemented<br />
by 75% by June 2013<br />
Procurement and<br />
Supplies<br />
Procurement and<br />
Supplies<br />
1.4: Recruit to fill<br />
established posts<br />
1.5: Develop and<br />
implement ICT<br />
programme<br />
1.4.1: HR recruitment <strong>plan</strong><br />
developed and approved by<br />
December 2008<br />
1.5.1: A comprehensive ICT<br />
programme in TANAPA<br />
operations fully developed by<br />
June 2009<br />
Human Resources<br />
ICT<br />
1.6: Mainstream<br />
gender issues<br />
1.6.1: Gender balance<br />
improved by June 2013<br />
Human Resources<br />
1.6.2: Qualified disadvantaged<br />
candidates given priority during<br />
recruitment by June 2013<br />
Human Resources
Key Performance<br />
Indicators<br />
Objective<br />
Increased staff<br />
morale<br />
Low labour<br />
turnover<br />
Strategy Target Functional<br />
Responsibility<br />
2.1: Review<br />
incentive/<br />
benefits package<br />
2.1.1: Competitive<br />
remunerations, incentive/<br />
benefits package developed<br />
and approved by March 2009<br />
Human Resources<br />
2.2: Improve<br />
social amenities<br />
2.2.1: Adequate medical staff<br />
and facilities provided to each<br />
park by 2013<br />
Administration<br />
2.2.2: Each staff children<br />
residing in parks have access<br />
to nursery and primary<br />
education by June 2013<br />
Administration<br />
2.2.3: Each park to have<br />
functional recreational centres<br />
by June 2011<br />
Administration<br />
2.3: Implement<br />
HIV/AIDS<br />
programme<br />
2.3.1: HIV/AIDS programme<br />
developed and operational by<br />
June 2009<br />
SO 2: Staff<br />
welfare and<br />
benefits<br />
improved<br />
Administration<br />
43
Objective<br />
Key Performance<br />
Indicators<br />
Increased<br />
species richness,<br />
distribution and<br />
diversity<br />
Strategy Target Functional<br />
Responsibility<br />
3.1: Make<br />
decisions based<br />
on researched<br />
information<br />
3.1.1: Research and ecological<br />
monitoring programme<br />
reviewed and operational by<br />
June 2009<br />
Ecological Monitoring<br />
3.2: Develop<br />
<strong>Parks</strong> System<br />
Plan<br />
3.1.2: Animal disease<br />
invatigation and control<br />
programme reviewed and<br />
operational by June 2009<br />
3.2.1: Key ecosystems are<br />
represented in the national<br />
park network by June 2013<br />
Veterinary Unit<br />
Planning<br />
3.2.2: Key wildlife<br />
corridors/dispersal areas<br />
secured by June 2013<br />
Outreach<br />
3.3: Develop<br />
water use<br />
guidelines<br />
3.3.1: Water development and<br />
management scheme<br />
developed and operational<br />
for 15 parks by June 2013<br />
SO 3:<br />
<strong>National</strong><br />
parks<br />
biodiversity<br />
and adjacent<br />
ecosystems<br />
effectively<br />
conserved<br />
Ecological Monitoring<br />
44
45<br />
Objective<br />
Key Performance<br />
Indicators<br />
Strategy Target Functional<br />
Responsibility<br />
3.4: Improve<br />
park resources<br />
protection<br />
system<br />
3.4.1: A comprehensive law<br />
enforcement programme<br />
developed and operational by<br />
December 2009<br />
Protection<br />
3.4.2: <strong>National</strong> Park Ordinance<br />
reviewed and enforced by<br />
June 2010<br />
Legal Services<br />
3.4.3:<br />
Trans- boundary collaboration<br />
mechanism developed and in<br />
use by December 2008<br />
Protection<br />
.4.4: Local and international<br />
obligations to improve<br />
resource protection met<br />
annually<br />
DG<br />
3.5: Implement<br />
waste<br />
management<br />
<strong>plan</strong><br />
3.5.1: Waste management <strong>plan</strong><br />
reviewed and operational by<br />
June 2010<br />
Planning
Objective<br />
Key Performance<br />
Indicators<br />
More avenues<br />
for income<br />
generation<br />
Increase in<br />
income generation<br />
thus self<br />
sufficiency to meet<br />
operations<br />
Increase in<br />
contribution to the<br />
Treasury<br />
Strategy Target Functional<br />
Responsibility<br />
4.1: Diversify<br />
and effectively<br />
promote tourism<br />
products and<br />
services<br />
4.1.1: Tourism marketing strategy<br />
reviewed and implemented<br />
by June 2009<br />
4.1.2: New tourism products<br />
developed and introduced by<br />
June 2009<br />
Tourism<br />
Planning<br />
4.1.3: Collaboration with key<br />
stakeholders strengthened and<br />
implemented by 2013<br />
Tourism<br />
4.1.4: Develop and implement<br />
tourism investment policy (to<br />
guide private investments) by<br />
December 2008<br />
Planning<br />
4.2: Invest in<br />
tourism and<br />
non-tourism<br />
ventures<br />
4.2.1: Develop and implement<br />
investment business <strong>plan</strong> by<br />
June 2009<br />
SO 4:<br />
Organizatio<br />
n’s potential<br />
for income<br />
generation<br />
fully<br />
realized<br />
Planning<br />
46
Key Performance<br />
Indicators<br />
Strategy Target Functional<br />
Responsibility<br />
4.3: Improve<br />
finance controls<br />
Objective<br />
Increased<br />
presence and<br />
movement of<br />
wildlife between<br />
core and<br />
surrounding areas<br />
Improved<br />
participation and<br />
collaboration<br />
Reduced<br />
conflicts<br />
5.1: Improve<br />
working<br />
relations<br />
4.3.1: An effective and efficient<br />
system for controlling income and<br />
expenditure improved and<br />
operational by June 2010<br />
5.1.1: Conservation education<br />
programme reviewed and<br />
operational by December 2008<br />
5.1.2: Modalities for continued<br />
dialogue with local<br />
communities and other key<br />
stakeholders reviewed and<br />
operationalized by December 2008<br />
Finance<br />
Outreach<br />
Outreach<br />
5.2: Contribute<br />
towards poverty<br />
reduction<br />
5.2.1: System for contribution to<br />
poverty reduction in adjacent<br />
communities developed and<br />
operational by December 2008<br />
Outreach<br />
5.2.2: Benefit sharing mechanisms<br />
reviewed and implemented by<br />
June 2009<br />
SO 5:<br />
Organizational<br />
partnerships<br />
with<br />
adjacent<br />
communities<br />
and key stakeholders<br />
in the<br />
management of<br />
parks and<br />
buffer zone<br />
resources<br />
improved<br />
Outreach<br />
47
48<br />
Objective<br />
Key Performance<br />
Indicators<br />
Strategy Target Functional<br />
Responsibility<br />
5.3: Establish<br />
partnerships<br />
5.3.1: Public-<br />
Private-Community<br />
Partnerships guidelines<br />
developed and operational by<br />
June 2009<br />
Outreach<br />
5.4: Minimize<br />
human-wildlife<br />
conflicts<br />
5.4.1: Conflict resolution mechanisms<br />
developed and operational<br />
by December 2009<br />
Outreach<br />
5.4.2: 15 <strong>National</strong> <strong>Parks</strong><br />
boundaries demarcated and<br />
marked by June 2013<br />
Protection<br />
5.4.3: Problem animals control<br />
programme developed and<br />
operational June 2009<br />
Protection
Key Performance<br />
Indicators<br />
Reduced<br />
operational costs and<br />
time<br />
Increased<br />
visitors<br />
experience<br />
Increased<br />
accessibility and use of<br />
parks<br />
Increased<br />
rationalization of<br />
institutional resources for<br />
management<br />
Increased<br />
productivity<br />
Timely and appropriate<br />
decisions<br />
Increased level of<br />
customer satisfaction<br />
Strategy Target Functional<br />
Responsibility<br />
6.1: Improve<br />
and develop<br />
infrastructure<br />
6.2: Enforce<br />
EIA in every<br />
physical<br />
development<br />
activity<br />
7.1: Install<br />
management<br />
system<br />
6.1.1: A development and<br />
maintenance programme for<br />
road network, airstrips, staff<br />
housing, offices, visitor<br />
centres and control gates<br />
prepared and operationalized<br />
by December 2008<br />
6.2.1: EIA and PEA<br />
guidelines reviewed and<br />
operational by June 2009<br />
7.1.1: Policy guidelines for<br />
<strong>plan</strong>ning and implementation<br />
of all programmes and <strong>plan</strong>s<br />
developed and operational by<br />
June 2009<br />
7.1.2: Existing GMP <strong>plan</strong>ning<br />
guidelines are updated by June<br />
2009<br />
7.1.3: 15 parks are managed<br />
according to approved GMPs by<br />
June 2013<br />
Civil<br />
Engineering<br />
Planning<br />
Planning<br />
Planning<br />
Objective<br />
SO 6:<br />
Infrastructure to<br />
achieve<br />
institutional<br />
conservation<br />
development<br />
goals developed<br />
and<br />
maintained<br />
Planning<br />
49<br />
SO 7:<br />
Management<br />
and<br />
implementation<br />
of<br />
programmes<br />
and <strong>plan</strong>s<br />
improved
50<br />
Objective<br />
Key Performance<br />
Indicators<br />
Strategy Target Functional<br />
Responsibility<br />
7.1.4: Approved CSP mid<br />
term externally reviewed and<br />
evaluated by June 2011<br />
Planning<br />
7.1.5 Staff open performance<br />
appraisal system introduced<br />
and institutionalized by June<br />
2009<br />
Human Resources<br />
7.1.6: Participatory policy<br />
and management decisions<br />
made annually<br />
DG<br />
7.2: Institute<br />
monitoring and<br />
evaluation<br />
7.2.1: Monitoring and<br />
Evaluation section<br />
established by June 2009<br />
Planning<br />
7.2.2: Monitoring and<br />
Evaluation manual<br />
developed and operational<br />
by June 2009<br />
Planning