12.01.2015 Views

Corporate plan (PDF 936 kB) - Tanzania National Parks

Corporate plan (PDF 936 kB) - Tanzania National Parks

Corporate plan (PDF 936 kB) - Tanzania National Parks

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Tanzania</strong> <strong>National</strong> <strong>Parks</strong>


TABLE OF CONTENTS<br />

PREFACE …………………………………………………………………................................................…...........<br />

BOARD OF TRUSTEES ……………..............................……………………………..................…….…...............<br />

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY …………………..…………………………...................................................…............<br />

ABBREVIATIONS ……………………………………………………...............................................……..............<br />

i<br />

iv<br />

v<br />

vii<br />

1. CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION …………………………………..............................................…........... 1<br />

1.1. Background ………………………………………….………….............................................……….......... 1<br />

1.2. Methodology ………………………………………...….............................................……………….......... 2<br />

1.3. Benefits of the CSP …………………………………………................................................………............ 3<br />

1.4. Outlines of the CSP …………………………………………...............................................…………......... 3<br />

2. CHAPTER TWO: SITUATIONAL ANALYSIS …………...……...................................................……......... 4<br />

2.1. Recent history …………………………………….………............................................……………........... 4<br />

2.2. Organization’s legal mandate …………………………................................................................................ 6<br />

2.3. Existing Organizational Vision and Mission …………………………......................................................... 6<br />

2.3.1. Vision ………………………………………………..………………................................................ 6<br />

2.3.2. Mission ……………………………………………………………................................................... 6<br />

2.4. Recent Initiatives and Developments ………………………….…………................................................... 7<br />

2.4.1. Macro and Sectoral Initiative in <strong>Tanzania</strong> …………………………................................................. 7<br />

2.4.2. Review of Current Tourism Trend ………………………………...............................……….......... 9<br />

2.4.3. TANAPA initiatives ………………………………………...…………........................................... 12<br />

2.5. SWOC Analysis (Organizational Scan) …………………………….........................................……............ 15<br />

2.5.1. Strength .……………………………………………………..……….................................….......... 15<br />

2.5.2. Weakness ……………………………………………………...………............................................. 16<br />

2.5.3. Opportunities ……………………………..................................……………………..……….......... 16<br />

2.5.4. Challenges …………………………………………………………….............................................. 17<br />

2.5.5. Problem analysis ………………………………………………………............................................ 17<br />

2.6. Stakeholder/Customer Analysis ………………………………….........................................………............ 20<br />

2.7. Critical Issues ……………………………………………….............................................…………............ 24<br />

2.8. Strategic Core Functions …………………………………….............................................…...……............ 26<br />

2.8.1. Role of Board of Trustees …………………………………..…......................................................... 26<br />

2.8.2. Role of the Director General ………………………………............................................….............. 27<br />

2.8.3. Role of the Directors ………………………………………….......................................................... 27<br />

3. CHAPTER THREE: THE PLAN ………..…………………………..............................................…............... 29<br />

3.1.1. Core Values ………………………………………................................……………………............. 29<br />

3.1.2. Vision statement ………………………………………………..................................………........... 29<br />

3.1.3. Mission Statement ………………………………………................................………..……............ 29<br />

3.1.4. Strategic Objectives ………………………………………………..................................…….......... 29<br />

4. CHAPTER FOUR: STRATEGIES AND TARGETS …………………............................................................ 32<br />

ANNEXURE 1: ORGANIZATION STRUCTURE …………..…………………..................................…........... 39<br />

ANNEXURE 2: SUMMARY OF THE CSP ……………………………………...................................…............ 40<br />

BOXES, FIGURES AND TABLES<br />

Box 1.1: Conservation …………………………………………………………………............................................ 1<br />

Box 2.1: Local Communities …………………………………………………...............................…………........... 4<br />

Box 2.2: Stakeholders ………………………………………………………………...............................…….......... 4<br />

Box 2.3: Benefit Sharing …………………………………………………………..............................……….......... 5<br />

Table 2.1: Average growth rate (%) of International Tourists Arrivals World Wide by region, 1995-2020............... 10<br />

Table 2.2: Tourism Trend in <strong>Tanzania</strong> 2001-2005 ………………………….................................………................. 11<br />

Figure 1: Number of Tourists Arrivals from 2000/01 to 2004/05 …………………...............................…............... 13<br />

Figure 2: Revenue trend …………………………………………………………..............................……................ 15<br />

Table 4.1: Strategies and Targets ……………………………………………………................................…........... 32<br />

Table 4.2: Strategies and Targets ……………………………………………………................................…........... 33<br />

Table 4.3: Strategies and Targets …………………………………………………….................................….......... 34<br />

Table 4.4: Strategies and Targets …………………………………………………................................…............... 35<br />

Table 4.5: Strategies and Targets ……………………………………………………................................…........... 36<br />

Table 4.6: Strategies and Targets ……………………………………………………................................…........... 37<br />

Table 4.7: Strategies and Targets …………………………………………………….................................….......... 38


i<br />

PREFACE<br />

Statement of the Chairman of the Board of Trustees<br />

Conservation in <strong>Tanzania</strong>n <strong>National</strong> <strong>Parks</strong> is the<br />

main thrust of the organization as clearly stated by<br />

law. In order to manage the parks efficiently and<br />

effectively, a timely review of key strategic<br />

decisions is important. During the implementation<br />

of the previous <strong>Corporate</strong> Strategic Plan (CSP) of<br />

2001 – 2006, the Board of Trustees embarked on<br />

fundamental decisions that aimed at transforming the<br />

organization towards improved resource management and optimal<br />

revenue generation.<br />

The new CSP 2008/09 -2012/13 emphasizes on the organization’s<br />

mandate, of conservation, which is in line with the <strong>National</strong><br />

Development Vision 2025. The vision underscores the importance of<br />

conservation of our national heritage. The CSP also puts a special<br />

emphasis for TANAPA on contributing to poverty reduction, as<br />

stipulated in the <strong>National</strong> Strategy on Growth and Reduction of Poverty<br />

(NSGRP – MKUKUTA). The Board is therefore determined to promote<br />

tourism significantly as a mechanism of not only generating funds for<br />

conservation purposes, but also contributing to poverty reduction. The<br />

institution has been supporting community social projects and in this<br />

new CSP, efforts will be made to enhance its collaboration with<br />

adjacent communities.<br />

The Board is aware of the turbulent economic, technological and<br />

political environment in which the organization is operating, thus a<br />

need for frequent review of its strategies. The Board of Trustees is<br />

convinced that, this CSP’s vision, which is “to be the highest globally<br />

rated institution in sustainable conservation and provision of<br />

exceptional tourism services”, will be attained significantly within the<br />

<strong>plan</strong>ned five years.Therefore, the Board of Trustees commits itself to<br />

give the management total support to implement this CSP.<br />

Mr. Modestus Lilungulu<br />

Chairman, Board of Trustees<br />

Arusha, February 2008


ii<br />

Statement of the Director General<br />

It has been an exciting moment for <strong>Tanzania</strong><br />

<strong>National</strong> <strong>Parks</strong> (TANAPA) to ascend to a point<br />

where we have in place a new <strong>Corporate</strong> Strategic<br />

Plan (2008/09 – 2012/13), which will enable the<br />

organisation to attain her dream as the highest<br />

globally rated organization in sustainable<br />

conservation and delivery of exceptional tourism<br />

services.<br />

The readers of this third generation of the organization corporate <strong>plan</strong>s,<br />

which started back in 1997, will realise that we are determined to make<br />

a difference in all aspects. We intend to bridge gaps that currently exist<br />

and to adapt new ways of doing business. Additionally, we are aware of<br />

what is taking place elsewhere in the World in relation to conservation<br />

business. It gives us pleasure to have in place the framework for<br />

executing the institution’s daily operations with effectiveness and<br />

efficiency while not compromising the sustainability of our valuable<br />

natural resources.<br />

The identified organizational objectives to fulfill our institution’s<br />

conservation mandate in accordance to this new CSP are:<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

To ensure that the institutional capacity is developed to<br />

operate effectively and efficiently at all levels;<br />

To improve staff welfare and benefits;<br />

To effectively conserve the national parks biodiversity and<br />

their adjacent ecosystems;<br />

To realize the organization’s potential in income generation;<br />

To improve organizational partnerships with adjacent<br />

communities and key stakeholders in the management of<br />

parks and buffer zones;<br />

To develop and maintain infrastructure to achieve<br />

institutional development goals; and lastly,<br />

To improve management and implementation of programmes<br />

and <strong>plan</strong>s.<br />

These institutional objectives will definitely propel the organization<br />

towards attainment of her core business.


iii<br />

This <strong>plan</strong> draws inputs from a workshop that was conducted from<br />

12 th -14 th February 2007 at Uhuru Hostel in Moshi. The workshop was<br />

attended by the Directors, Managers and Chief Park Wardens from all<br />

the parks. Personally, I would like to convey my appreciation to the<br />

Consultant, Mr. Nathaniel Rusumo and the workshop participants for<br />

their valuable inputs. I am also thankful to the Board of Trustees for<br />

their valuable inputs and by availing Trustee Erasmus Tarimo to work<br />

with Mr. Sam Swai (Consultant) in Bagamoyo from 11 th to 15 th<br />

February 2008. Lastly, but not least, I am grateful to the technical team<br />

for their endless effort in drafting and finalizing this important <strong>plan</strong><br />

document.<br />

My call to all stakeholders is to continue giving us material and moral<br />

support while managing our national parks to enable TANAPA achieve<br />

her dream of being the highest globally rated organization in her efforts<br />

for the benefit of humanity. We can do it, let us all play our part!<br />

Gerald Bigurube<br />

Director General<br />

Arusha, February 2008


iv<br />

BOARD OF TRUSTEES<br />

Mr. Modestus Lilungulu<br />

Chairman<br />

Mrs Mariam Wilmore<br />

IGP Saidi A. Mwema<br />

Mr Lukonge P. Mhandagani<br />

Hajjat Mrs Zainab G. Muruke<br />

Hon. Riziki S. Lulinda (MP)<br />

Mr Erasmus Tarimo<br />

Hon. Lazaro Nyalandu (MP) Dr. Marcellina Chijoriga<br />

Prof. Bukheti Kilonzo<br />

Mr. Gerald Bigurube<br />

Hon. Ramadhan A. Maneno (MP)


v<br />

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY<br />

Introduction<br />

This CSP (2008/09-2012/13) has 7 strategic objectives (SOs),<br />

25 strategies and 51 targets.<br />

Core Values (<strong>Corporate</strong> culture)<br />

The organizational core values are:<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Accountable organization managing national parks<br />

sustainably<br />

Innovative and highly organized institution in providing<br />

high quality services<br />

Efficient in deploying resources to exceed customer<br />

expectations<br />

Vision Statement<br />

To be the highest globally rated institution in<br />

sustainable conservation and provision<br />

of exceptional tourism services<br />

Mission Statement<br />

Our mission is to sustainably<br />

conserve and manage park resources<br />

and their aesthetic value, for the benefit of present and future<br />

generations of mankind, as well as efficiently provide high class<br />

tourism products and services.<br />

Strategic Objectives<br />

The organizational objectives for the institution within the coming five<br />

years are:<br />

1. Institutional capacity to operate effectively and efficiently<br />

developed;


vi<br />

2. Staff welfare and benefits improved;<br />

3. <strong>National</strong> parks biodiversity and their adjacent ecosystems<br />

effectively conserved;<br />

4. Organization’s potential in income generation realized;<br />

5. Organizational partnerships with adjacent communities and<br />

key stakeholders in the management of parks and buffer<br />

zones improved;<br />

6. Infrastructure to achieve institutional development goals<br />

developed and maintained; and lastly,<br />

7. Management and implementation of programmes and <strong>plan</strong>s<br />

improved.<br />

Expected Outcome of the CSP<br />

It is envisaged that at the end of the five years, which is in June 2013,<br />

the outcome will be:<br />

High service delivery standards<br />

Improvement in corporate productivity<br />

Increased staff morale<br />

Low labour turnover<br />

Reduced operational costs and time<br />

Increased visitors experience<br />

Increased accessibility<br />

Increased species richness, distribution and diversity<br />

More avenues for income generation<br />

Increase in income generation thus self sufficiency to meet<br />

operations<br />

Increase in contribution to the Treasury<br />

Increased presence and movement of wildlife between core<br />

and surrounding areas<br />

Improved participation and collaboration<br />

Reduced conflicts<br />

Increased rationalization of institutional resources for<br />

management<br />

Increased productivity<br />

Timely and appropriate decisions<br />

Increased level of customer satisfaction


ABBREATIONS<br />

AICC<br />

BoT<br />

CITES<br />

CSP<br />

DFID<br />

EA<br />

EAC<br />

EU<br />

GIS<br />

GMP<br />

GPS<br />

GTZ<br />

HIV/AIDS<br />

ICT<br />

IUCN<br />

JICA<br />

LAN<br />

M & E<br />

MNRT<br />

MTEF<br />

NORAD<br />

POS<br />

ROI<br />

SWOC<br />

TANAPA<br />

TANESCO<br />

TATO<br />

TNA<br />

TTB<br />

TTCL<br />

UNDP<br />

UNEP<br />

UNESCO<br />

UNWTO<br />

USAID<br />

URT<br />

WAN<br />

WMAs<br />

Arusha International Conference Centre<br />

Board of Trustees<br />

Convention on International Trade of Endangered Species<br />

<strong>Corporate</strong> Strategic Plan<br />

Department for International Development<br />

East Africa<br />

East African Community<br />

European Union<br />

Geographic Information System<br />

General Management Plan<br />

Global Positioning System<br />

Deutsche Gesellschsft fur Technische Zusammenarbeit<br />

Human Immunodeficiency Virus/Acquired Immune Deficiency<br />

Syndrome<br />

Information and Communication Technology<br />

International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural<br />

Resources (World Conservation Union)<br />

Japanese International Cooperation Agency<br />

Local Area Network<br />

Monitoring and Evaluation<br />

Ministry of Natural Resources and Tourism<br />

Medium Term Expenditure Framework<br />

Norwegian Agency for International Development<br />

Point of Sales<br />

Return on Investments<br />

Strength, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Challenges<br />

<strong>Tanzania</strong> <strong>National</strong> <strong>Parks</strong><br />

<strong>Tanzania</strong> Electric Supply Company<br />

<strong>Tanzania</strong> Association of Tour Operators<br />

Training Needs Assessment<br />

<strong>Tanzania</strong> Tourist Board<br />

<strong>Tanzania</strong> Telecommunication Company Limited<br />

United <strong>National</strong> Development Programme<br />

United Nations Environmental Programme<br />

United Nations Education, Scientific and Cultural Organization<br />

United Nations World Tourism Organization<br />

United States Agency for International Development<br />

United Republic of <strong>Tanzania</strong><br />

Wide Area Network<br />

Wildlife Management Areas<br />

vii


1<br />

1.1 Background Information<br />

CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION<br />

The Tanganyika <strong>National</strong> <strong>Parks</strong> Ordinance CAP [412] of 1959<br />

established the organization now known as <strong>Tanzania</strong> <strong>National</strong> <strong>Parks</strong><br />

(TANAPA), and Serengeti became the first <strong>National</strong> Park. In this<br />

document, TANAPA is also referred to as “the organization or the<br />

institution”. By February 2007, the organization has grown to<br />

15 national parks. Conservation of eco-systems in all areas designated<br />

as national parks is the core business of the organisation (Box 1).<br />

Box 1.1: Conservation<br />

The term embeds protection or preservation or management and rational<br />

utilization of natural resources<br />

Nature based or wildlife tourism is the main source of income that is<br />

ploughed back for management, regulation, and fulfilment of all<br />

organisational mandates in the national parks.<br />

This <strong>Corporate</strong> Strategic Plan (CSP) is a document that produces<br />

fundamental decisions and actions that shape and guide what the<br />

institution is, what it does, and why it does it. The core contents of the<br />

CSP are:<br />

Vision<br />

Mission<br />

Strategic Objectives<br />

Strategies<br />

Targets<br />

Review of the CSP<br />

During the review of the previous CSP (2001-2006), it was revealed<br />

that <strong>plan</strong>ning was participative especially at headquarters but not so at<br />

all park levels. Also inadequate monitoring and evaluation of its<br />

implementation was found to be the major weakness. It was further<br />

noted that, most parks failed to link the CSP to the General<br />

Management Plans (GMPs) of individual parks. Inadequate capacity<br />

building of staff at all levels hampered the effective implementation of


2<br />

the CSP and other associated <strong>plan</strong>s. In addition, although the Clients’<br />

Service Charter (CSC) as a framework for customer care was<br />

developed it has not been fully institutionalised at the corporate level.<br />

1.2 Methodology<br />

Based on the previous review of the CSP, there is a need for this <strong>plan</strong><br />

(2008/09-2012/13) to reflect corporate ideas, dynamism, and team<br />

spirit. The main theme for this <strong>plan</strong> is: “To be the highest globally<br />

rated institution in sustainable conservation of national parks<br />

resources and provision of exceptional tourism products”.<br />

This third generation of corporate strategic <strong>plan</strong>s is formulated taking<br />

into consideration the observations in section 1.1 above.<br />

TANAPA organised a participatory <strong>plan</strong>ning workshop, which was held<br />

at Uhuru Hostel, Moshi from 12th - 14th February 2007 to review and<br />

prepare this CSP. The Director General, Directors, Managers, Chief<br />

Park Wardens, and senior staff participated in the workshop. An<br />

overview of the previous CSP was made through three presentations as<br />

follows:<br />

A presentation on the status of the implementation of the<br />

2001 – 2006 CSP from the <strong>plan</strong>ning perspectives;<br />

A presentation on the status of implementation of the same<br />

<strong>plan</strong> from the practical field perspective; and<br />

A presentation on key issues emanating from the <strong>plan</strong> and<br />

critical review of other documents from an external<br />

perspective.<br />

Participants met in small groups to discuss the reviews in relation to the<br />

mandate of organization and later presented the same in the plenary for<br />

consensus. The plenary integrated the reviews to produce situational<br />

analysis and key issues relevant to the institution. These issues were<br />

analysed to generate strategic objectives, strategies, and targets for<br />

achieving the vision and mission of the organization.<br />

In order for the organization to come up with a vision and mission<br />

tagged at world-class standards, the workshop participants discussed,<br />

among others, the following:<br />

The significance of the World Heritage Sites (Serengeti and<br />

Kilimanjaro), 7 th Wonder of the current World (Serengeti


3<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

wildebeest migration) and Biosphere Reserves (Serengeti and<br />

LakeManyara) in the <strong>Tanzania</strong> <strong>National</strong> <strong>Parks</strong> system;<br />

The World and regional tourism trends;<br />

The East African Community (EAC) Treaty and the<br />

possibility of establishment of the East African Federation;<br />

and<br />

The world trends on principles of conservation in relation to<br />

<strong>Tanzania</strong> tourism.<br />

The document was widely distributed to headquarters staff and<br />

individual national parks for comments. The Management presented the<br />

document to the Board of Trustees for approval. A workshop for both<br />

operational staff, Management as well as the Board of Trustees will be<br />

conducted to instil the commitment to implement the <strong>plan</strong>. Furthermore,<br />

the output of the capacity-building workshop is to internalise the <strong>plan</strong><br />

and create ownership of the same at all levels of the<br />

organization.<br />

1.3 Benefits of the CSP<br />

Upon implementation of this CSP, the following will be achieved:<br />

First, it will bridge gaps between what used to exist in the<br />

institution and what is envisaged so as to demonstrate<br />

alertness to change in the global business;<br />

Secondly, there will be readiness to offer something new,<br />

especially in relation to tourism development, that is to<br />

demonstrate insights of what is happening in the<br />

organization and elsewhere in the world;<br />

Thirdly, there will be new ways of doing organizational<br />

business (new culture);<br />

Fourthly, execution and allocation of resources as <strong>plan</strong>ned at<br />

a corporate level will be made effective.<br />

1.4 Outline of the CSP<br />

Chapter one provides an introduction of the previous <strong>plan</strong>s,<br />

methodology, benefits and outline. Chapter two discusses the situational<br />

analysis of the organization and what is happening elsewhere. Chapter<br />

three provides the <strong>plan</strong> including the core values, vision, mission and<br />

strategic objectives. Chapter four has the strategies and targets.


4<br />

2.1 Recent History<br />

CHAPTER TWO: SITUATIONAL ANALYSIS<br />

The institution continued with its mandate to manage and regulate use<br />

of areas designated as national parks by regular patrols to curb<br />

poaching against wildlife and forest products, to promote and monitor<br />

tourism activities so as to avoid overuse of the areas. Ecological and<br />

wildlife health monitoring were carried out. Collaboration with local<br />

communities (Box 3) living adjacent to national parks and other<br />

relevant stakeholders was enhanced through the outreach programme.<br />

Box 2.1: Local Communities<br />

This terminology embraces all villages, wards, divisions and district authorities<br />

sharing boarders with national parks.<br />

Ecological changes occurring inside and outside the parks are of<br />

consequential influence to wildlife resources in the parks. Both natural<br />

and man made impacts were recorded and where necessary mitigated.<br />

Climatic changes, which are resulting in extensive disturbance to<br />

ecological processes in the parks, were closely monitored in<br />

collaboration with both national and international institutions.<br />

During the implementation of the previous CSP, the organization<br />

continued to place higher priority on protection of natural resources,<br />

park facilities and safety of visitors. The resources protection and<br />

operations were strengthened in collaboration with surrounding<br />

communities and other relevant stakeholders (Box 2.2).<br />

Box 2.2: Stakeholders<br />

The term, in its broad sense, refers to anybody with legitimate interest to<br />

national parks and/or is affected by its presence either negatively or positively.<br />

The organization also provided support to village governments in<br />

training Village Games Scouts (VGS) for the protection of<br />

community-conserved areas. Modern equipment for anti-poaching<br />

activities was provided to park rangers. New recruitments for park<br />

rangers and training were conducted in order to equip them with


5<br />

modern skills and techniques in the resource protection.<br />

On the tourism front, the organizational goal has always been to<br />

enhance visitor experience and enjoyment in the parks to match with<br />

the changing and diverse demands and tastes. In order to enhance<br />

visitor experience, the institution progressively improved its services,<br />

facilities and infrastructure for tourists visiting the national parks.<br />

Production of information materials indicating potential resources was<br />

given due emphasis. Marketing programmes were carried out<br />

aiming at luring more tourists to visit the parks.<br />

As part of corporate social responsibility, the organization through its<br />

Outreach Program Department continued to carry its function of<br />

creating awareness to local communities living adjacent to parks on the<br />

importance of conservation and benefit sharing (Box 2.3) from revenue<br />

accrued from tourism.<br />

Box 2.3: Benefit sharing<br />

TANAPA contributes to the well-being of the local communities according to<br />

the ability of the parks. This sharing of benefits includes sharing of infrastructure<br />

and services, cash or in-kind contributions to local projects, and assistance<br />

in setting up sustainable income generating enterprises based on<br />

non-park natural resources.<br />

However, emphasis is now being put into supporting income-generating<br />

projects such as bee-keeping, community conservation banks, poultry<br />

and livestock keeping. Despite the above achievements, the<br />

organization faces a number of challenges including the following:<br />

Poaching<br />

Habitat degradation<br />

Blockage of wildlife corridors<br />

Unclear demarcation of most of national parks’ boundaries<br />

Lack of buffer zones<br />

Inadequate resources (human, financial and physical)<br />

Inadequate business skills among communities.


6<br />

2.2 Organization’s Legal Mandate<br />

The organization’s mandate is “to manage and regulate the use of areas<br />

designated as <strong>National</strong> <strong>Parks</strong> by such means and measures to preserve<br />

the country’s heritage, encompassing natural and cultural resources,<br />

both tangible and intangible resource values”, including:<br />

Fauna and flora, wildlife habitat, natural processes,<br />

wilderness qualities, scenery therein, and<br />

Provide the same for human benefit and enjoyment in such<br />

manner and by such means as will leave them unimpaired<br />

for future generations.<br />

2.3 Existing Organizational Vision and Mission<br />

2.3.1 Vision<br />

The vision of the institution in the previous CSP was to; “Ensure<br />

sustainable conservation of parks resources and values for the benefit<br />

and enjoyment of the present and future generations of mankind”.<br />

2.3.2 Mission<br />

Likewise, in the previous CSP of 2001-2006, the mission was to,<br />

“Sustainably conserve the <strong>Parks</strong> resources and values for the benefit of<br />

all humankind” through:<br />

Protecting and regulating use of areas designated as<br />

<strong>National</strong> <strong>Parks</strong>;<br />

Selecting and recommending for gazettement areas of<br />

ecological, cultural and scientific significance;<br />

Strategically managing a national system of <strong>Parks</strong> that<br />

protect outstanding example of key ecosystems in<br />

collaboration with local communities, and<br />

Developing, managing and promoting tourism and other<br />

revenue generating activities for the benefit of all<br />

<strong>Tanzania</strong>ns, the African continent and the World at large.


7<br />

2.4 Recent Initiatives and Developments<br />

2.4.1 Macro and Sectoral Initiatives in <strong>Tanzania</strong><br />

a) <strong>Tanzania</strong>’s Development Vision 2025<br />

During 1980’s the government realized that the past development<br />

policies and strategies were not adequately responding to changing<br />

market and technological conditions in the world economy. In response,<br />

beginning mid-1986, the Government adopted various socio-economic<br />

reforms and during their implementation, it became apparent to the<br />

government that those socio-economic reforms were not adequately<br />

informed by a national long-term development philosophy and<br />

direction. Realization of this led to the formulation of the <strong>Tanzania</strong><br />

Development Vision.<br />

The Vision is an articulation of a desirable future condition or situation<br />

which <strong>Tanzania</strong> envisages to attain and the plausible course of action to<br />

be taken for its achievement. The Vision was adopted by the<br />

Government in 1999 and its implementation started in 2000. The<br />

objective of the vision is to awaken, coordinate and direct the people’s<br />

efforts, minds and national resources towards those core sectors that<br />

will enable us to attain our development goals.<br />

The Vision envisions that <strong>Tanzania</strong> will have the following attributes by<br />

the year 2025:<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

High quality livelihood: a nation’s development should be<br />

people centered based on sustainable and shared growth and<br />

be free from abject poverty;<br />

A strong and competitive economy: this emphasizes the<br />

need to have an economy which can effectively cope with<br />

the challenges of development and which can easily benefit<br />

from global economy;<br />

Good governance: this entails to strengthen a culture of<br />

accountability, rewarding good performance and effectively<br />

curbing corruption and vices in the society;


8<br />

<br />

<br />

A well educated and learning population: this envisages a<br />

nation whose people are engrained with a developmental<br />

mindset and competitive spirit. It is driven by education and<br />

knowledge; and<br />

Peace, stability and unity: peace, political stability and<br />

national unity and social cohesion are important pillars for<br />

realization of vision. Therefore, they should continue to be<br />

cultivated, nurtured and sustained.<br />

In order to attain those aspirations, determination and discipline in<br />

<strong>plan</strong>ning and implementation is important. TANAPA therefore will<br />

direct her efforts to contribute to the realization of the Vision 2025.<br />

b) Fourth Government’s vision on conservation<br />

The inaugural speech by His Excellence the fourth President of United<br />

Republic of <strong>Tanzania</strong> Jakaya Mrisho Kikwete delivered on December<br />

30 th , 2005, in the parliament in Dodoma, shows clearly that the central<br />

theme of the fourth government, [same period of this <strong>plan</strong>], is<br />

conservation of natural resources to its original state as well as<br />

responsible tourism development and promotion. By responsible<br />

tourism it means, that <strong>Tanzania</strong> needs to develop the kind of tourism<br />

that gives direct benefits to local communities adjacent to tourist<br />

attractions while at the same time caring for the environment. This<br />

inaugural speech by the Head of State clearly shows where <strong>Tanzania</strong> is<br />

heading to in relation to conservation of natural resources. Strategic<br />

objectives of this CSP have incorporated the central theme of the<br />

President’s speech.<br />

c) Ministry of Natural Resources and Tourism’s (MNRT) vision,<br />

mission and strategic objectives<br />

i) Vision<br />

Sustainable conservation of natural and cultural resources and<br />

development of responsible tourism for all.


9<br />

ii) Mission<br />

In order to conform to the vision, the operating mission of the Ministry<br />

is to conserve natural and cultural resources sustainably and develop<br />

tourism for national prosperity and for the benefit of humanity through:<br />

Development of appropriate policies, strategies and<br />

guidelines;<br />

Formulation of laws and regulations;<br />

Monitoring and evaluation of the implementation of policies;<br />

Promotion of quality tourism business of local and global<br />

communities; and<br />

Development of human resources and institutional capacity<br />

building at all levels.<br />

d) Review of Wildlife Policy (1998) and Conservation Act of 1974<br />

Review of Wildlife Policy of 1998 and Act of 1974 reflect the critical<br />

need for various pertinent issues for transformation of wildlife<br />

sub-sector in <strong>Tanzania</strong>. These issues include: wildlife corridors,<br />

national parks and game reserves buffer zones, wildlife management<br />

areas (WMAs) and the whole concept of community based<br />

conservation that advocates community ownership and management of<br />

protected areas. Summation of this review is compatible with the world<br />

and regional trends in new conservation principles and strategies.<br />

2.4.2 Review of Current Tourism Trends<br />

a) World and Regional Trends in Conservation Principles<br />

United Nations Development Programme (UNDP 1990) advocates that<br />

any development intervention whether at an international, regional or<br />

national/local level is sustainable only if it is people centered or has<br />

practical human inclusion in its functions. Authors Opschoor (2002)<br />

and Mahbub (1998) also share this perspective on sustainable<br />

development. The concept of responsible tourism, which is the popular<br />

theme of UNWTO is in agreement with this UNDP perspective.<br />

UNWTO supports the popular concept of responsible tourism, which is,<br />

to conserve environment while at the same time alleviating poverty.


) World and Regional Tourism Trends<br />

Comparison of growth rate of tourism in <strong>Tanzania</strong> with the world and<br />

by region shows that, tourism growth in <strong>Tanzania</strong> grew at the rate of<br />

10% between 1995 and 2000, while during 2000-2005 the tourism<br />

sector grew at the rate of 9.3% . Tourism has been growing in <strong>Tanzania</strong><br />

at an average rate of 3.7% more than Africa as a region per annum<br />

(Table 2.1).<br />

Table 2.1: Average Annual Growth Rate (%) of International<br />

Tourist Arrivals World Wide and by region, 1995-2020<br />

Region 1995-2000 2000-2010 2010-2020<br />

Africa 6.0 5.6 5.1<br />

Americas 3.9 3.8 3.8<br />

East Asia/Pacific 7.7 7.2 6.6<br />

Europe 3.1 3.1 3.1<br />

Middle East 6.9 6.7 6.5<br />

South Asia 6.4 6.2 5.8<br />

World 4.2 4.2 4.4<br />

<strong>Tanzania</strong> 10 9.3 N/A<br />

Difference<br />

Between<br />

<strong>Tanzania</strong> and<br />

4.0 3.7 N/A<br />

Africa<br />

Source: World Tourism Organization (UNWTO): Tourism 2020 Vision<br />

c) East African Community (EAC) Treaty<br />

The central theme of East African Community (EAC) Treaty on<br />

conservation is the same as that of UNDP and UNWTO. The treaty<br />

puts emphasis on quality tourism and sustainable development, which<br />

is people, centered.<br />

10


11<br />

d) <strong>Tanzania</strong>’s Tourism Trend (Tourism Policy – 1999)<br />

The central theme of Tourism Policy in <strong>Tanzania</strong> is quality tourism that<br />

means low volume of tourists and high yield of revenue. Furthermore,<br />

the policy has adopted the popular theme of UNWTO. However, there<br />

are two challenges facing the practicability of this policy:<br />

i) Measures to mitigate the free international tourism business<br />

to marry national tourism <strong>plan</strong>ning that takes care of both<br />

upper, and lower markets, and<br />

ii) Easy implementation of the ultimate goal of the quality<br />

tourism policy given the current trend of statistics of tourism.<br />

Tourism trend in <strong>Tanzania</strong> is as shown in Table 2.2 below.<br />

Table 2.2: Tourism Trend in <strong>Tanzania</strong> 2001 - 2005<br />

Year 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005<br />

International<br />

tourists<br />

525,000 575,235 576,198 582,807 612,754<br />

Tourists in Hotels 501,081 535,146 552,000 562,332 568,798<br />

Revenue (Million<br />

US $)<br />

Average tourists<br />

consumption per<br />

day (US $)<br />

725 730 731 746.14 822<br />

173 159 1 153 1 188 1 156 1<br />

82 2 82 2 119 2 125 2<br />

No. of tourist<br />

Hotels<br />

Occupancy rate<br />

per annum<br />

Source: MNRT Budget speech 2006/07<br />

329 465 469 469 476<br />

59 59 47 53 43<br />

1<br />

. Package tourists<br />

2<br />

. Non-package tourists


12<br />

2.4.3 TANAPA Initiatives<br />

a) Protection of Resources<br />

Protection of resources has been improved after implementation of the<br />

following activities:<br />

Deployment of more park rangers and distribution to various<br />

parks after training<br />

Acquisition of patrol and communication equipment<br />

Communities involvement through the intelligence services<br />

b) Expansion of <strong>National</strong> <strong>Parks</strong><br />

Kilimanjaro and Mount Meru Forest Reserves formerly under the<br />

Forestry and Beekeeping Division were successfully gazetted in 2005<br />

and were annexed to Kilimanjaro and Arusha <strong>National</strong> <strong>Parks</strong>,<br />

respectively. Efforts are underway to annex Usangu Game Reserve with<br />

Ruaha <strong>National</strong> Park, making it the largest national park in <strong>Tanzania</strong><br />

and one of the largest in Africa. The process initiated by the<br />

government aims at protecting the Ihefu wetland and the Great Ruaha<br />

River with associated catchment areas and biodiversity.<br />

c) Gazettement of New <strong>National</strong> <strong>Parks</strong><br />

Saadani and Kitulo <strong>National</strong> <strong>Parks</strong> were gazetted in 2005. The<br />

gazettement of the two parks is one of the success stories of the<br />

previous <strong>Corporate</strong> Plan (2001-2006). Two more national parks, namely<br />

Mkomazi and Saanane, will be added to the national parks system in<br />

the near future while the Speke Gulf will be annexed to Serengeti<br />

<strong>National</strong> Park. There is potential for Mt. Rungwe Forest to be annexed<br />

to Kitulo <strong>National</strong> Park.<br />

d) Tourism Development<br />

There has been a steady growth in nature-based tourism in national<br />

parks. Tourist attractions were diversified to enhance visitor experience.<br />

New products include walking safaris, canoeing, and night game drives.<br />

Old products such as game drives, ballooning, spot fishing,<br />

chimpanzee tracking and mountain climbing were progressively<br />

improved. The number of resident arrivals increased from 98,509 in


13<br />

2000/01 to 215,717 in 2004/05. Similarly, international arrivals<br />

increased from 220,910 in 2000/01 to 348,048 in 2004/05<br />

(see Figure 1 below).<br />

Figure 1: Number of Tourist Arrivals from 2000/01 to 2004/05<br />

e) Information and Communication Technology<br />

Information and communication technology was introduced in the<br />

organization in 2003. There is an intranet at the Head Office in Arusha.<br />

All the parks have internet services and will be linked to Head Office.<br />

Computerization, use of Global Positioning Systems (GPS) technology<br />

in the ranger force, veterinary and ecology units, and application of<br />

Geographical Information Systems (GIS) in park management is being<br />

pursued.<br />

Desktop publishing has taken off after training of core staff. The unit<br />

manages and undertakes numerous activities that were formerly<br />

contracted out. The institution will embark on comprehensive use of<br />

wide area network (WAN) as well as local area network (LAN) to<br />

facilitate its daily operations.<br />

f) Investments in <strong>National</strong> <strong>Parks</strong><br />

In order to enhance visitor enjoyment and experience, park and tourist


14<br />

facilities were continually constructed, maintained and improved.<br />

Tourist investments were constructed and old ones improved to meet<br />

the demand for accommodation inside the parks. Number of flights<br />

operated by the private sector also increased especially to northern<br />

parks.<br />

Construction of phase I & II of the Head Office complex in Arusha was<br />

completed during the implementation of the previous <strong>Corporate</strong><br />

Strategic Plan. The complex has been named after the late First<br />

President and Father of the Nation Mwalimu J.K. Nyerere in honour for<br />

his pioneering work on conservation as stated in the Arusha Manifesto.<br />

g) Management of Human Capital<br />

The personnel were streamlined according to the organization<br />

structure. The organization boasts of a workforce of over 1650 staff,<br />

though still inadequate. In its desire to maintain a team of qualified and<br />

motivated staff, training opportunities were provided, even though there<br />

was no comprehensive training programme. Recruitment of staff and<br />

promotions were effected to stimulate quality performance among staff<br />

in accordance to the scheme of service.<br />

h) Procurement of Goods and Services<br />

Procurement of working equipment and tools was undertaken based on<br />

the budgets and the Public Procurement Act of 2004 and its<br />

amendments.<br />

i) Working Environment<br />

So far, the organization has tried to improve the working<br />

environment in terms of remuneration and other fringe benefits such as<br />

group-endowment insurance scheme. However, given the working<br />

conditions in the national parks, the need for improvement of working<br />

incentives is still pertinent.<br />

j) Revenue Generation and Collection<br />

Within five years, the revenue generation trend has more than doubled<br />

(Figure 2). This trend is the basis for revenue forecast in the next five


15<br />

years. Computerization of accounts has been introduced and Points of<br />

Sales (POS) have been installed in some selected parks to improve<br />

revenue collection and controls.<br />

Figure 2: Revenue Trend<br />

2.5 SWOC Analysis (Organizational Scan)<br />

2.5.1 Strengths<br />

The Organization manages some of the most important<br />

exceptional and diverse natural areas in the world, including<br />

two World Heritage Sites (Serengeti and Kilimanjaro<br />

<strong>National</strong> <strong>Parks</strong>) and two Biosphere Reserves (Serengeti and<br />

Lake Manyara <strong>National</strong> <strong>Parks</strong>) with a potential of more<br />

being upgraded to such international categories.<br />

The institution continues to manage the areas designated as<br />

<strong>National</strong> <strong>Parks</strong> from its own funds with minimal dependency<br />

on external funding.<br />

Strong public support and political will in conservation<br />

matters has assisted the organization to effectively carry out<br />

its mandate such that <strong>National</strong> <strong>Parks</strong> are managed at the<br />

highest level of protection<br />

The inter-disciplinary <strong>plan</strong>ning process, which has been<br />

institutionalized in the organization, is a very useful tool to<br />

ensure that all-important aspects are considered in<br />

preparation of park General Management Plans.


16<br />

2.5.2 Weaknesses<br />

Lack of decentralized budget system delays implementation<br />

of various <strong>plan</strong>ned tasks.<br />

Lack of a monitoring and evaluation unit that is responsible<br />

for conducting systematic assessment of implementation of<br />

the CSP, management <strong>plan</strong> and corporate budgets have<br />

denied valuable feedback.<br />

The institution ability to meet its mandate has been largely<br />

dependent on a narrow and risky revenue base of tourism.<br />

Insufficient communication and information technology has<br />

slowed decision-making process and implementation of<br />

<strong>plan</strong>s across the organization.<br />

Inadequate professionals in some departments have affected<br />

efficiency and accountability.<br />

Inadequate human resource, equipment and infrastructure<br />

have reduced efficiency.<br />

Lack of a comprehensive incentive package for the staff has<br />

reduced motivation.<br />

Inadequate skills and knowledge denies creative ideas in the<br />

organization and proper human resource management styles.<br />

Inability of most parks to generate enough revenues to meet<br />

their operational costs.<br />

Slow pace in adapting management of change<br />

(sticking to ‘mental models’) has delayed institutional<br />

development.<br />

2.5.3 Opportunities<br />

Growing tourism industry and diversification of tourism<br />

products will enhance implementation of the institution<br />

mandate.<br />

Public – private- community partnerships will enhance<br />

synergy.<br />

Political stability and support will ensure sustainability<br />

Favourable national policies and legislatives framework will<br />

improve working environment.<br />

International support will enhance the conservation efforts of<br />

the organization.<br />

There are potential investments to generate revenue other<br />

than tourism.


17<br />

2.5.4 Challenges<br />

Rapid human population increase in the areas adjacent to<br />

<strong>National</strong> <strong>Parks</strong> means increased human-wildlife conflicts and<br />

poaching.<br />

Political interventions may derail the implementation of the<br />

CSP.<br />

Lack of integrated <strong>plan</strong>ning with surrounding districts could<br />

lead to land use conflicts between stakeholders and parks.<br />

International terrorism.<br />

Disease outbreaks such as bird flu could affect tourist’s<br />

arrivals.<br />

Natural disasters may affect the tourism industry and<br />

conservation endeavors.<br />

2.5.5 Problem Analysis<br />

1. Resources<br />

The organization is faced with limited resources in terms of human,<br />

financial and physical resources to implement the set conservation and<br />

development goals. Additionally, the sources of revenue are dependent<br />

only on tourism revenues, something that is dangerous as tourism is a<br />

fragile business. The revenue base has to be expanded to sustainably<br />

fund conservation efforts of national parks spread in the whole country.<br />

2. Organizational Culture<br />

Basically, organizational culture is the personality of the organization.<br />

Culture is comprised of the assumptions, values, norms and signs<br />

(artifacts) of organization members and their behaviours. The concept<br />

of culture is particularly important when attempting to manage<br />

organization – wide change. The organization must realize that, despite<br />

the best laid <strong>plan</strong>s, organizational change must include not only<br />

changing structures and processes, but also changing the corporate<br />

culture as well. The institution has been operating based on the<br />

traditional way of doing business. This situation has led to delayed<br />

adoption of new changes especially in the use of appropriate<br />

technology and modern conservation ethos. A new culture to do<br />

business in the organization is wanting.


18<br />

3. Employee Competence<br />

Core competencies are not adequately defined for all job categories and<br />

such jobs are not periodically reviewed and designed to respond to<br />

organizational needs so that staff are recruited with required skills and<br />

competencies. The existing scheme of service does not lead to<br />

achievement of staff competencies.<br />

4. Employee Attitudes<br />

Understandably, employees can perceive and respond to events around<br />

them as their choice. Positive employee attitudes create positive actions<br />

toward organizational goals. Coping with the continuous changes that<br />

do not favour staff, leaves many people confused, fearful and<br />

sometimes angry. As attitudes deteriorate, so do commitment, loyalty<br />

and, most importantly, performance. Therefore it is critical to turn<br />

passive resistance into high – energy performance by establishing<br />

personal responsibility and accountability in the midst of change.<br />

5. Tasks and Processes<br />

Planned tasks in the organization are usually undertaken after<br />

completion of bureaucratic processes that sometimes take time. Where<br />

processes are simpler then tasks are performed effectively and<br />

efficiently. Bureaucratic processes within the organization have<br />

sometimes delayed and resulted into unfinished tasks.<br />

6. People Management Styles<br />

People are the only sustainable competitive advantage in the<br />

organization. Many managers have not attended people management<br />

courses that various and different management styles are practiced in<br />

the institution. Due to lack of a unified management style, complaints<br />

have been recorded from different personnel both from the parks and<br />

the Head Office. The managers have paramount obligations to ensure<br />

that all necessary resources are provided - including the employee’s<br />

skills, information, other people, equipment, funds, authority and time.<br />

Moreover, the focus must stay firmly on performance – with clear<br />

standards or guidelines by which you will evaluate performance – what<br />

you consider important and how much you expect – including ethical


19<br />

standards. It is important therefore for the management to attend<br />

regular training on human resource management and practice the<br />

knowledge imparted on them.<br />

7. Organization Situation<br />

Strategic <strong>plan</strong>ning must include organization’s environment because no<br />

organization operates in a vacuum. The very definition of strategic<br />

<strong>plan</strong>ning stresses the importance of focusing on the future within the<br />

context of an ever- changing environment – the myriad of political,<br />

economic, social, technological, demographic and legal forces that<br />

change our world daily. Since the institution does not conduct a<br />

situational assessment annually, there is a need to use SWOC analysis<br />

technique to get perceptions of the organization from both internal and<br />

external stakeholders. The results will add valuable information to<br />

situation assessment.


20<br />

2.6 Stakeholder/Customer Analysis<br />

There are different stakeholders and customers who affect<br />

organizational operations in a number of ways. It is therefore important<br />

to carry out an analysis in order to ensure that their interests and<br />

expectations are met during the preparation of this CSP.<br />

Stakeholder<br />

Group<br />

1. Ngorongoro<br />

Conservation<br />

Area Authority<br />

2. Wildlife Division,<br />

Forestry and<br />

Beekeeping<br />

Department,<br />

Fisheries<br />

Department,<br />

Antiquities<br />

Department<br />

Expectations From<br />

TANAPA By<br />

stakeholder<br />

Enhanced<br />

collaboration<br />

Conservation Policies<br />

appropriately<br />

implemented<br />

Expectations By<br />

TANAPA From<br />

stakeholder<br />

Enhanced<br />

collaboration<br />

Up to date<br />

conservation Acts<br />

and policies<br />

How to Engage<br />

Consultative fora to<br />

discuss issues of<br />

mutual interest<br />

Collaborate and<br />

cooperate in<br />

formulating policies<br />

Exchange experiences<br />

in conservation and<br />

tourism related<br />

matters<br />

3. Board of Trustees TANAPA capacity<br />

improved and<br />

continue to prosper<br />

in carrying out its<br />

mandate<br />

Board decisions are<br />

in line with the CSP<br />

Board decisions are<br />

in line with<br />

government policies,<br />

directives and the<br />

approved CSP<br />

4. TAWIRI, TAFIRI,<br />

TAFORI,<br />

Researchers in<br />

PAs<br />

Research<br />

opportunities availed<br />

Research findings<br />

support<br />

conservation<br />

activities<br />

Consultative fora<br />

5. Training<br />

Institutions<br />

(Mweka, Pasiansi,<br />

Sokoine<br />

University (SUA),<br />

University of<br />

Dar es salaam<br />

(UDSM)<br />

<strong>National</strong> <strong>Parks</strong><br />

provide students for<br />

the training<br />

institutions. <strong>Parks</strong><br />

continue as research<br />

grounds and provide<br />

field attachment<br />

experience<br />

The organization gets Consultations and<br />

qualified and feedback mechanisms<br />

competent employees<br />

and consultation<br />

services.<br />

6. NGOs: WWF,<br />

AWF, FZS, WCS,<br />

WCST, OIKOS,<br />

IUCN, CITES<br />

Participation in<br />

conservation and<br />

development efforts<br />

Support and<br />

complement<br />

institution<br />

conservation efforts<br />

Terms and conditions<br />

for collaboration


21<br />

7. Lusaka<br />

Agreement Task<br />

Force<br />

Collaborative efforts<br />

in curbing cross<br />

boundary illegal<br />

trafficking of wildlife<br />

resources<br />

Illegal trafficking of<br />

wildlife resources are<br />

significantly reduced<br />

Consultative<br />

<strong>plan</strong>ning and<br />

feedback mechanism<br />

8. Development<br />

Partners: GTZ,<br />

USAID, DFID,<br />

NORAD, UNDP,<br />

UNEP, UNESCO,<br />

DANIDA, JICA, EU,<br />

UNICEF<br />

Support<br />

Support and<br />

provided for complement<br />

conservation produce conservation efforts<br />

expected results<br />

Terms and conditions<br />

for collaboration<br />

9. Local<br />

communities<br />

adjacent to<br />

national parks<br />

Realize benefits from<br />

conservation<br />

Communities<br />

continue to use<br />

indigenous<br />

knowledge and other<br />

conventional means<br />

to support<br />

conservation efforts<br />

Reciprocal action<br />

programme<br />

10. Institutional staff Improved working<br />

and living conditions<br />

11. International<br />

community<br />

The <strong>Parks</strong> are<br />

conserved for the<br />

benefit of present and<br />

future generations of<br />

mankind<br />

Institutional staff<br />

enable the organization<br />

to achieve her<br />

vision and mission<br />

International<br />

community to<br />

support conservation<br />

efforts<br />

Enforcement of<br />

contractual<br />

obligations and<br />

performance<br />

agreements<br />

Collaborative<br />

synergy<br />

arrangements<br />

12. Treasury Institution is<br />

financially self<br />

sufficient and<br />

contributes in the<br />

conservation and<br />

development efforts<br />

All revenues accrued<br />

from tourism and<br />

other sources<br />

ploughed back to<br />

support<br />

conservation and<br />

development of the<br />

national parks<br />

Retention scheme<br />

13. Investors, Tour<br />

Operators,<br />

Business<br />

Community<br />

Good infrastructure,<br />

safety, and amicable<br />

relations<br />

Promote parks, viable<br />

investments, quality<br />

services and conform<br />

to park rules and<br />

regulations<br />

Consultative<br />

feedback fora


14. TTB Institution continues<br />

to improve visitor<br />

TTB continues to<br />

promote <strong>National</strong><br />

products and services <strong>Parks</strong> locally and<br />

in national parks internationally<br />

Consultative fora for<br />

sharing information<br />

and leveraging<br />

marketing efforts<br />

15. Travel<br />

agencies/airline<br />

<strong>Parks</strong> are reliable and<br />

safe destinations<br />

16. TATO Customer care and<br />

programmes in<br />

services in national<br />

parks meet visitors<br />

expectations<br />

17. AICC Conference tourists<br />

expectations in<br />

national parks met<br />

18. Law Enforcement<br />

Institutions<br />

19. Local and Central<br />

Governments<br />

20. Guides and<br />

Porters in<br />

mountain parks<br />

Manage the national<br />

parks in accordance<br />

to the Ordinance Cap<br />

412 of 1959 and its<br />

amendments<br />

Institution provides<br />

employment,<br />

generates revenues<br />

and conserves<br />

biodiversity<br />

21. Politicians Institution provides<br />

employment,<br />

generates revenues<br />

and support<br />

communities<br />

22. Traditional<br />

Religious Groups<br />

23. Financial<br />

Institutions<br />

More tourists are<br />

facilitated to visit the<br />

<strong>Parks</strong><br />

Consultative fora for<br />

sharing information<br />

Adherence to rules Consultation and<br />

and regulations in the continuous sharing of<br />

parks<br />

information<br />

Integration of<br />

conference packages<br />

with park visits.<br />

Law enforcement<br />

Institutions to speed<br />

up wildlife related<br />

court cases<br />

Institution continue Porters and guides<br />

to provide opportunities<br />

for local services to visitors<br />

offer excellent<br />

employment<br />

Permitted to carry<br />

out traditional<br />

worship in the parks<br />

Institution continue<br />

to use financial services<br />

Agreement for<br />

cooperation<br />

Consultative fora<br />

Ensured conducive Integration of<br />

environment in terms corporate social<br />

of policy and political responsibility and<br />

will<br />

outreach<br />

programmes into<br />

district development<br />

<strong>plan</strong>s<br />

Ensured political<br />

support at all levels<br />

Traditional<br />

knowledge to<br />

enhance<br />

conservation efforts<br />

Excellent financial<br />

services and<br />

consultation<br />

Contractual<br />

arrangement for<br />

service delivery<br />

Consultative fora for<br />

information sharing<br />

Consultative<br />

information sharing<br />

promoted<br />

Contractual<br />

arrangement<br />

22


The following groups affect institutional operations negatively:<br />

Group<br />

Expectations from<br />

TANAPA by the group<br />

1. Poachers They are not arrested and<br />

desire that wildlife will<br />

always be available for their<br />

use<br />

2. Bandits Illegally acquired wealth<br />

from tourists<br />

3. Wildlife traffickers Illegally acquired wealth<br />

from wildlife<br />

Expectations By<br />

TANAPA From<br />

Stakeholders<br />

Poachers reformed through<br />

awareness<br />

creation and support<br />

conservation efforts<br />

Bandits are controlled in collaboration<br />

with Law<br />

Enforcement Institutions and<br />

enhance visitors<br />

safety and experience<br />

Incidences of illegal<br />

trafficking of wildlife<br />

resources is significantly<br />

reduced<br />

4. Business Competitors Maintain monopoly Competition improves<br />

services provided to<br />

Institutional customers<br />

5. Farmers and<br />

inhabitants<br />

Maintain status quo<br />

Wildlife corridors and<br />

dispersal areas are opened<br />

6. Miners Maintain status quo Miners (outside the parks)<br />

adhere to environmental<br />

standards and procedures<br />

23


24<br />

Customers Groups<br />

2.7 Critical Issues<br />

Expectations from<br />

TANAPA by Customers<br />

Expectations<br />

by TANAPA from<br />

Customers<br />

1. Tourists Value for money Revenue generation and<br />

continue visiting our parks<br />

but adhere to rules and<br />

regulations<br />

2. Institution Employees Better working and living<br />

conditions<br />

3. Tour operators and<br />

investors, Business<br />

community,<br />

Concessionaires<br />

4. Financial Institutions<br />

(banks)<br />

5. Service Providers (TTCL,<br />

TANESCO, Water and<br />

sewerage)<br />

Good infrastructure, safety,<br />

and amicable relations<br />

Institution continue to use<br />

financial services<br />

Institution continue to use<br />

the service providers<br />

6. Media groups Institution provides reliable<br />

and relevant information to<br />

the public through the media<br />

7. Local Communities Livelihoods of the adjacent<br />

communities improved<br />

through tourism ventures<br />

8. General Public <strong>Parks</strong> are conserved as<br />

<strong>National</strong> Heritage sites for<br />

the present and future<br />

generations<br />

1. Inadequate institutional capacity to operate effectively and<br />

efficiently<br />

Underutilization of modern technology and equipment<br />

Insufficient staff training and motivation<br />

Inadequate staff and working equipment<br />

Insufficient staff and office accommodation<br />

Institution staff enable the<br />

organization to achieve her<br />

vision and mission<br />

Promote parks, viable<br />

investments, quality services<br />

and conform to park rules<br />

and regulations<br />

Excellent financial services<br />

and consultation<br />

Reliable and quality services<br />

provided<br />

Media groups support<br />

Institution efforts by<br />

enhancing public awareness<br />

on biodiversity conservation<br />

The adjacent communities<br />

become active allies in<br />

conservation and<br />

development efforts<br />

The general public supports<br />

conservation of national<br />

parks for present and future<br />

generations


25<br />

<br />

<br />

Inappropriate schemes of service and staff establishment<br />

High organization structure<br />

2. Inadequate staff welfare programmes<br />

HIV/AIDS prevalence<br />

No specific training programmes on HIV/AIDS and other<br />

infectious diseases<br />

Inadequate medical staff and services<br />

Inadequate staff recreation facilities<br />

Inadequate staff education and health facilities.<br />

3. Ineffective conservation of ecosystems in areas designated as<br />

national parks<br />

Islandisation due to external pressures<br />

Poaching<br />

Human-wildlife conflicts<br />

Global climatic changes<br />

Shortage of water supply to wildlife in some parks<br />

Wildfires and diseases<br />

Inappropriate waste management<br />

4. Organization revenue generation potential not fully realized<br />

Inadequate tourism development for enhancing visitor’s<br />

experience<br />

Inadequate revenue avenues and collection system<br />

Inadequate diversification of tourists products<br />

Inadequate numbers and quality of tourism investments in<br />

parks<br />

Inadequate aggressive marketing locally and internationally<br />

(electronic media)<br />

Inadequate Information Visitor Centres<br />

Ineffective management of external pressures<br />

5. Passive involvement/participation of stakeholders in conservation<br />

of parks<br />

Weak relations between national parks and adjacent<br />

communities<br />

Weak linkage between community development projects to<br />

conservation<br />

Inadequate benefit sharing mechanism assistance to enable


26<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

adjacent communities to establish own initiatives.<br />

No investment partnerships between the organization and<br />

adjacent communities<br />

No established mechanisms for involving communities in<br />

conservation to enable them get user-rights<br />

Unfavorable coexistence between national parks and other<br />

stakeholders in conservation of parks<br />

6. Inadequate infrastructure to achieve organization’s set<br />

conservation goals<br />

Improperly developed access roads, airstrips and signage<br />

Adhoc housing programmes and constructed without<br />

approved standards<br />

Insufficient maintenance programme<br />

Inadequate and low quality staff housing<br />

7. Ineffective management of programmes and <strong>plan</strong>s<br />

Inadequate coordination in the preparation and<br />

implementation of programmes and <strong>plan</strong>s at all levels<br />

Failure to link the CSP and GMPs<br />

Weak adherence to guidelines, procedures and rules during<br />

implementation of <strong>plan</strong>s<br />

Inadequate monitoring and evaluation<br />

2.8 Strategic Core Functions<br />

This CSP recognizes the roles and strategic core functions of the Board<br />

of Trustees, Director General and directors for the effective<br />

implementation of this <strong>plan</strong>.<br />

2.8.1 Role of Board of Trustees<br />

To set policies and programmes for efficient and effective<br />

management of the organization; and to provide an oversight role in the<br />

management and approve policies in line with recommendations<br />

provided by the management, headed by the Director General, and<br />

relevant government organs.


27<br />

2.8.2 Role of the Director General<br />

Provide strategic direction and visionary leadership; coordinate the<br />

implementation of all activities of the institution in line with policies<br />

approved by the Board of Trustees, and with the following key<br />

functional mandates in the office:<br />

<br />

<br />

General management<br />

Ensure that the institution conserves wildlife in all<br />

national parks<br />

2.8.3 Role of the Directors<br />

Director of Conservation and <strong>Parks</strong> Operations<br />

Direct security functions in the institution activities and<br />

make appropriate recommendations thereon to the Board of<br />

Trustees, Director General and managers<br />

Work closely with other directors and security agencies<br />

to ensure that wildlife is conserved, protected and managed<br />

properly<br />

Develop biodiversity research and monitoring priorities,<br />

collaborate with scientific and research institutions<br />

Direct community conservation activities in all<br />

national parks<br />

Oversee operations in the parks<br />

Director of Human Resources and Administration<br />

Provide corporate support services in the organization,<br />

general office administration and estates management<br />

Provide human recourses management services<br />

Develop human resources management <strong>plan</strong>s, policies,<br />

regulations, procedures and guidelines regarding recruitment,<br />

training, and staff welfare<br />

Handling of industrial relations matters regarding labour<br />

disputes and disciplinary issues


28<br />

Director of Planning and Tourism Development<br />

Direct preparations, reviews and implementation of general<br />

management <strong>plan</strong>s in the organization<br />

Direct tourism development, marketing and customer<br />

services<br />

Direct coordination, monitoring and evaluation of<br />

implementation efforts<br />

Director of Finance<br />

Ensure that the financial stability of the institution is<br />

achieved and that appropriate controls exist to safeguard the<br />

assets and resources<br />

Ensure timely allocation of financial resources to<br />

user centres<br />

Ensure preparation of corporate budget and its<br />

implementation<br />

Chief Park Wardens<br />

Facilitate implementation of the CSP at parks level<br />

Implement the GMPs<br />

Other corporate support services<br />

- Internal Audit<br />

Overall risk-management policy<br />

Carry out management audits to ensure effective utilization<br />

of institution’s resources<br />

Ensure that operations are timely accomplished within the<br />

budget timeframes<br />

Advise management on proper controls<br />

-Legal Services<br />

Advise Board of Trustees and the management on all legal<br />

matters affecting the institution<br />

- <strong>Corporate</strong> Communications<br />

To establish, maintain and project the TANAPA’s corporate<br />

image and identity.


29<br />

CHAPTER THREE: THE PLAN<br />

3.1 Core Values<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Accountable organization managing national parks<br />

sustainably<br />

Innovative and highly organized institution in providing<br />

high quality services<br />

Efficient in deploying resources to exceed customer<br />

expectations<br />

3.2. Vision Statement<br />

To be the highest globally rated institution in sustainable conservation<br />

and provision of exceptional tourism services.<br />

3.3. Mission Statement<br />

Our mission is to sustainably conserve and manage park resources and<br />

their aesthetic values, for the benefit of present and future generations<br />

of mankind, as well as efficiently provide high class tourism products<br />

and services.<br />

3.4. Strategic Objectives<br />

SO 1: Institutional capacity to operate effectively and efficiently<br />

fully developed<br />

Institutional capacity building is essential in providing staff with<br />

technical or material assistance designed to strengthen one or more<br />

elements of organisational effectiveness. The elements of effectiveness<br />

include good governance, management capacity, human resources,<br />

financial resources, service delivery, external relations, and<br />

sustainability. The goal of institutional capacity building is to<br />

strengthen the organisation in terms of its overall sustainability. ICT<br />

capacity within the organization is in dire need.


30<br />

SO 2: Staff welfare and benefits improved<br />

Staff welfare is very important in ensuring wellbeing of institutional<br />

staff. It also motivates staff and hence performance improvement. That<br />

being the case, it is very important to ensure that staff welfare issues<br />

are well addressed by ensuring that proper medical services to combat<br />

HIV/AIDS and other infectious diseases are provided to staff and their<br />

families. A competitive incentive package will be developed to attract<br />

and retain staff of required calibers, taking into account issues of<br />

gender balance. Staff recreational, education and health facilities will<br />

be improved in parks and Head Office.<br />

SO 3: <strong>National</strong> <strong>Parks</strong> biodiversity and their adjacent ecosystems<br />

effectively conserved<br />

The organization will ensure that all ecosystems are effectively<br />

represented in the national park system. Major issues that will be<br />

addressed include the opening of some corridors and dispersal areas<br />

and to reduce external pressures on parks; control illegal utilization of<br />

natural resources, wildfires, transmission of diseases and water sources.<br />

Other issues will include adaptive management through research and<br />

monitoring. Investments in the parks will be regulated and EIA studies<br />

conducted to minimize waste and pollution due to human activities.<br />

SO 4: Organization’s potential for income generation fully realized<br />

In order to accomplish corporate objectives the current and future<br />

operations must be adequately financed. Therefore various strategies<br />

need to be in place to increase and control revenue to match with<br />

increased operational costs. The strategies should include but not<br />

limited to broadening sources of revenue - by diversifying tourist<br />

products, investing in tourism and non - tourism ventures and tourism<br />

promotion. Revenue control mechanism will also be improved.<br />

SO 5: Organizational partnerships with adjacent communities and<br />

key stakeholders in the management of parks and buffer zone<br />

resources improved<br />

The organization will improve relations with the adjacent local<br />

communities and other key stakeholders by actively contributing


31<br />

towards reduction of poverty through <strong>National</strong> Strategy for Growth and<br />

Reduction of Poverty (MKUKUTA) and will encourage appropriate<br />

benefit sharing mechanisms. Where appropriate, the institution will<br />

initiate investment partnerships with the private sector and communities<br />

to improve viable livelihood options. The organization will also<br />

encourage and facilitate the establishment of WMAs outside park areas<br />

to enable communities secure user-rights and actively participate in<br />

conservation efforts of wildlife resources. Efforts will also be made to<br />

minimize human – wildlife conflicts in order to improve working<br />

relations with key stakeholders.<br />

SO 6: Infrastructure to achieve institutional conservation<br />

development goals developed and maintained<br />

For the organization to achieve its conservation development goals, the<br />

issue of quality infrastructure in national parks will be highly<br />

considered. This is due to the fact that without proper infrastructure,<br />

staff would not discharge their duties efficiently and effectively. During<br />

the implementation of this CSP, the organization will set aside enough<br />

resources for maintenance and development of access roads, airstrips,<br />

adequate staff houses, offices, control gates and visitor information<br />

centres.<br />

SO 7: Mechanisms and systems for management of programmes<br />

and <strong>plan</strong>s improved<br />

In order for the institution to achieve its objectives, it is important to<br />

ensure that programmes and <strong>plan</strong>s are well prepared and implemented.<br />

To achieve this, the organization will strengthen the <strong>plan</strong>ning functions<br />

at different levels of the organization. At the Head Office, the Planning<br />

and Development Projects Department will be strengthened by<br />

establishing a Monitoring and Evaluation section with a responsibility<br />

of carrying out systematic assessment of all the programmes and <strong>plan</strong>s<br />

to ensure that the organizational objectives are met. During the<br />

implementation of this CSP, emphasis will be placed on improving<br />

coordination, training, monitoring and evaluation.


CHAPTER FOUR: STRATEGIES AND TARGETS<br />

SO 1: Institutional capacity to operate effectively and efficiently<br />

fully developed<br />

Institutional capacity building is essential in providing staff with<br />

technical or material assistance designed to strengthen one or more<br />

elements of organisational effectiveness. The elements of effectiveness<br />

include good governance, management capacity, human resources,<br />

financial resources, service delivery, external relations and<br />

sustainablity. The goal of institutional capacity building is to<br />

strengthen the organization in terms of its overall sustainability. ICT<br />

application is not yet fully institutionalized in the organization.<br />

In view of the above, the institution will deploy a number of strategies<br />

with their corresponding targets outlined in the table below:<br />

Table 4.1: Strategies and Targets<br />

Strategies<br />

1.1: Train staff<br />

1.2: Restructure<br />

1.3: Retool<br />

Targets<br />

1.1.1: A comprehensive training programme<br />

developed and in place by December 2008<br />

1.1.2: The approved training programme<br />

implemented by 80% by June 2013<br />

1.1.3: 5 Directors and 26 Managers trained on<br />

basic management skills by June 2009<br />

1.2.1: Review and implement organization<br />

structure by December 2008<br />

1.2.2: Staff establishment, scheme of service and<br />

salary structure reviewed and operationalized<br />

by December 2009<br />

1.2.3: Staff regulations reviewed to conform with<br />

Employment and Labour Relations Act, 2004 by<br />

June 2009<br />

1.3.1: Retooling <strong>plan</strong> developed and approved<br />

by December 2008<br />

1.3.2: Retooling <strong>plan</strong> implemented by 75% by<br />

June 2013<br />

32


1.4: Recruit to fill<br />

established posts<br />

1.5: Develop and<br />

implement ICT<br />

programme<br />

1.6: Mainstream gender<br />

issues<br />

1.4.1: HR recruitment <strong>plan</strong> developed and<br />

approved by December 2008<br />

1.5.1: A comprehensive ICT programme in<br />

TANAPA operations fully developed by June<br />

2009<br />

1.6.1: Gender balance improved by June 2010<br />

1.6.2: Qualified disadvantaged candidates given<br />

priority during recruitment by June 2013<br />

SO 2: Staff welfare and benefits improved<br />

Currently, staff welfare and benefits are not optimally met; hence there<br />

is low staff morale in most parks. Medical services, recreational<br />

facilities and incentive packages are areas that need improvement.<br />

In view of the above, the organization will deploy a number of<br />

strategies with their corresponding targets outlined in the table below:<br />

Table 4.2: Strategies and Targets<br />

Strategies<br />

2.1: Review<br />

incentive/benefits<br />

package<br />

2.2: Improve social<br />

amenities<br />

Targets<br />

2.1.1: Competitive incentive/benefits package<br />

developed and approved by March 2009<br />

2.2.1: Adequate medical staff and facilities<br />

provided to each park by 2013<br />

2.3: Implement<br />

HIV/AIDS programme<br />

2.2.2: Each staff children residing in parks have<br />

access to nursery and primary education by June<br />

2013<br />

2.2.3: Each park to have functional recreational<br />

centres by June 2011<br />

2.3.1: HIV/AIDS programme developed and<br />

operational by June 2009<br />

33


SO 3: <strong>National</strong> <strong>Parks</strong> biodiversity and their adjacent ecosystems<br />

effectively conserved<br />

Ecosystems management is a core function of the organizational<br />

mandate. However, ecosystems are facing serious threats such as<br />

corridors and dispersal areas shrinkage due to increased human<br />

activities and poaching. Furthermore, biodiversity is threatened by<br />

transmission of diseases between human – wildlife - livestock<br />

interactions and wildfires. Water shortage is a chronic problem for<br />

human, livestock and wildlife in most parks and adjacent areas. This<br />

resource is continuously on the decrease.<br />

In view of the above, the institution will deploy a number of strategies<br />

with their corresponding targets outlined in the table below:<br />

Table 4.3: Strategies and Targets<br />

Strategies<br />

3.1: Make decisions<br />

based on researched<br />

information<br />

3.2: Develop <strong>Parks</strong><br />

System Plan<br />

3.3: Develop water use<br />

guidelines<br />

3.4: Improve park<br />

resources protection<br />

system<br />

Targets<br />

3.1.1: Research and ecological monitoring<br />

programme reviewed and operational by June<br />

2009<br />

3.1.2: Animal disease investigation and control<br />

programme reviewed and operational by June<br />

2009<br />

3.2.1: Key ecosystems are represented in the<br />

national park network by June 2013<br />

3.2.2: Key wildlife corridors/dispersal areas<br />

secured by June 2013<br />

3.3.1: Water development and management<br />

scheme developed and operational for 15 parks<br />

by June 2013<br />

3.4.1: A comprehensive law enforcement<br />

programme developed and operational by<br />

December 2009<br />

3.4.2: <strong>National</strong> Park Ordinance reviewed in<br />

accordance with the Wildlife Conservation Act<br />

by June 2010<br />

3.4.3: Trans- boundary collaboration mechanism<br />

developed and in use by December 2008<br />

34


3.4.4: Participatory policy and management<br />

decisions made annually<br />

3.5: Implement waste<br />

management <strong>plan</strong><br />

3.5.1: Waste management <strong>plan</strong> reviewed and<br />

operational by June 2010<br />

SO 4: Organization’s potential for income generation fully realized<br />

For years, the organization main source of revenue has been dependent<br />

on traditional tourism products. Therefore new strategies for<br />

broadening sources of revenue are required such as diversifying tourist<br />

products, investing in tourism and non - tourism ventures.<br />

In view of the above, the institution will deploy a number of strategies<br />

with their corresponding targets outlined in the table below:<br />

Table 4.4: Strategies and Targets<br />

Strategies<br />

4.1: Diversify and<br />

effectively promote<br />

tourism products and<br />

services<br />

Targets<br />

4.1.1: Tourism marketing strategy reviewed and<br />

implemented by June 2009<br />

4.1.2: New tourism products developed and<br />

introduced by June 2009<br />

4.1.3: Collaboration with key stakeholders<br />

strengthened and implemented by 2013<br />

4.1.4: Develop and implement tourism<br />

investment policy (to guide private investments)<br />

by December 2008<br />

4.2: Invest in tourism<br />

and non-tourism<br />

ventures<br />

4.3: Improve finance<br />

controls<br />

4.2.1: Develop and implement investment<br />

business <strong>plan</strong> by June 2009<br />

4.3.1: An effective and efficient system for<br />

controlling income and expenditure improved<br />

and operational by June 2010<br />

35


SO 5: Organizational partnerships with adjacent communities and<br />

key stakeholders in the management of parks and buffer zone<br />

resources improved<br />

The organizational working relationships with adjacent local<br />

communities and other key stakeholders are weak. The institution also<br />

does not have a proper strategy to contribute towards reduction of<br />

poverty through <strong>National</strong> Strategy for Growth and Reduction of<br />

Poverty (MKUKUTA) as well as appropriate benefit sharing mechanisms.<br />

Furthermore, the institution does not have effective partnerships<br />

with the private sector and communities to improve community<br />

livelihood options. Human – wildlife conflicts have not been properly<br />

addressed thereby threatening working relations with key stakeholders.<br />

In view of the above, the institution will deploy a number of strategies<br />

with their corresponding targets outlined in the table below:<br />

Table 4.5: Strategies and Targets<br />

Strategies<br />

5.1: Improve working<br />

relations<br />

5.2: Contribute towards<br />

poverty reduction<br />

5.3: Establish<br />

partnerships<br />

5.4: Minimize<br />

human-wildlife<br />

conflicts<br />

36<br />

Targets<br />

5.1.1: Conservation education programme<br />

reviewed and operational by December 2008<br />

5.1.2: Modalities for continued dialogue with<br />

local communities and other key stakeholders<br />

reviewed and operationalized by December 2008<br />

5.2.1: System for contribution to poverty<br />

reduction in adjacent communities developed<br />

and operational by December 2008<br />

5.2.2: Benefit sharing mechanisms reviewed and<br />

implemented by June 2009<br />

5.3.1: Public-Private-Community Partnerships<br />

guidelines developed and operational by June<br />

2009<br />

5.4.1: Conflict resolution mechanisms developed<br />

and operational by December 2009<br />

5.4.2: 15 national parks boundaries demarcated<br />

and marked by June 2013<br />

5.4.3: Problem animals control programme<br />

developed and operational by June 2009


37<br />

SO 6: Infrastructure to achieve institutional conservation<br />

development goals developed and maintained<br />

The institution has inadequate and substandard infrastructure in most<br />

national parks. The organization has not been setting aside enough<br />

resources for maintenance and development of access roads, airstrips,<br />

staff houses, offices, control gates and visitor information centres. As a<br />

result, staff do not discharge their duties efficiently and effectively.<br />

In view of the above, the institution will deploy a number of strategies<br />

with their corresponding targets outlined in the table below:<br />

Table 4.6: Strategies and Targets<br />

Strategies<br />

6.1: Improve and<br />

develop infrastructure<br />

6.2: Enforce EIA in<br />

every physical<br />

development activity<br />

Targets<br />

6.1.1: A development and maintenance<br />

programme for road networks, airstrips, staff<br />

housing, offices, visitor centres and control gates<br />

prepared and operationalized by December 2008<br />

6.2.1: EIA and PEA guidelines reviewed and<br />

operational by June 2009<br />

SO 7: Management and implementation of programmes and <strong>plan</strong>s<br />

improved<br />

Programmes and <strong>plan</strong>s are not well implemented and managed<br />

therefore the institution does not effectively achieve its objectives.<br />

Weak coordination has been noted in the <strong>plan</strong>ning functions at different<br />

levels of the organization, monitoring and evaluation.<br />

In view of the above, the institution will deploy a number of strategies<br />

with their corresponding targets outlined in the table below:


Table 4.7: Strategies and Targets<br />

Strategies<br />

7.1: Install performance<br />

management system<br />

(PMS)<br />

Targets<br />

7.1.1: Policy guidelines for <strong>plan</strong>ning and implementation<br />

of all programmes and <strong>plan</strong>s developed<br />

and operational by June 2009<br />

7.1.2: Existing GMP <strong>plan</strong>ning guidelines are<br />

updated by June 2009<br />

7.1.3: 15 parks are managed according to<br />

approved GMPs by June 2013<br />

7.1.4: Approved CSP mid term externally<br />

reviewed and evaluated by June 2011<br />

7.1.5: Staff open performance appraisal system<br />

introduced and institutionalized by June 2009<br />

7.1.6: Local and international obligations to<br />

improve resource protection met annually<br />

7.2: Institute monitoring<br />

and evaluation<br />

7.2.1: Monitoring and Evaluation Unit established by<br />

June 2009<br />

7.2.2: Monitoring and Evaluation manual developed<br />

and implemented by June 2009<br />

38


40<br />

ANNEX 2: PBF- 4.1 – SUMMARY OF THE CSP<br />

Institution Name: <strong>Tanzania</strong> <strong>National</strong> <strong>Parks</strong> (TANAPA)<br />

Period Covered: From Financial Year 2008/09 to the Financial Year<br />

2012/13<br />

Mission:<br />

Our mission is to sustainably conserve and manage park resources and<br />

their aesthetic values, for the benefit of present and future generations<br />

of mankind, as well as efficiently provide high class tourism products<br />

and services.<br />

Vision:<br />

To be the highest globally rated institution in sustainable conservation<br />

of national parks resources and provision of exceptional tourism<br />

products.<br />

Core values:<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Accountable organization managing national parks<br />

sustainably<br />

Innovative and highly organized institution in providing<br />

high quality services<br />

Efficient in deploying resources to exceed customer<br />

expectations


Key Performance<br />

Indicators<br />

Objective<br />

High service<br />

delivery standards<br />

Improvement in<br />

corporate<br />

productivity<br />

Reduced<br />

operational costs<br />

Strategy Target Functional<br />

Responsibility<br />

1.1: Train staff 1.1.1: A comprehensive<br />

training programme<br />

developed and in place by<br />

December 2008<br />

Human Resources<br />

1.1.2: The approved training<br />

programme implemented by<br />

80% by June 2013<br />

Human Resources<br />

1.1.3: 5 Directors and 26<br />

managers trained on basic<br />

management skills by June<br />

2009<br />

Human Resources<br />

1.2: Restructure 1.2.1: Review and implement<br />

organization structure by<br />

December 2008<br />

Human Resources<br />

1.2.2: Staff establishment,<br />

schemes of service and salary<br />

structure reviewed and<br />

operational by December 2009<br />

Human Resources<br />

1.2.3: Staff regulations<br />

reviewed by December 2008<br />

SO 1:<br />

Institutional<br />

capacity to<br />

operate<br />

effectively<br />

and<br />

efficiently<br />

fully<br />

developed<br />

Human Resources<br />

41


42<br />

Objective<br />

Key Performance<br />

Indicators<br />

Strategy Target Functional<br />

Responsibility<br />

1.3: Retool 1.3.1: Retooling <strong>plan</strong><br />

developed and approved by<br />

December 2008<br />

1.3.2: Retooling <strong>plan</strong> implemented<br />

by 75% by June 2013<br />

Procurement and<br />

Supplies<br />

Procurement and<br />

Supplies<br />

1.4: Recruit to fill<br />

established posts<br />

1.5: Develop and<br />

implement ICT<br />

programme<br />

1.4.1: HR recruitment <strong>plan</strong><br />

developed and approved by<br />

December 2008<br />

1.5.1: A comprehensive ICT<br />

programme in TANAPA<br />

operations fully developed by<br />

June 2009<br />

Human Resources<br />

ICT<br />

1.6: Mainstream<br />

gender issues<br />

1.6.1: Gender balance<br />

improved by June 2013<br />

Human Resources<br />

1.6.2: Qualified disadvantaged<br />

candidates given priority during<br />

recruitment by June 2013<br />

Human Resources


Key Performance<br />

Indicators<br />

Objective<br />

Increased staff<br />

morale<br />

Low labour<br />

turnover<br />

Strategy Target Functional<br />

Responsibility<br />

2.1: Review<br />

incentive/<br />

benefits package<br />

2.1.1: Competitive<br />

remunerations, incentive/<br />

benefits package developed<br />

and approved by March 2009<br />

Human Resources<br />

2.2: Improve<br />

social amenities<br />

2.2.1: Adequate medical staff<br />

and facilities provided to each<br />

park by 2013<br />

Administration<br />

2.2.2: Each staff children<br />

residing in parks have access<br />

to nursery and primary<br />

education by June 2013<br />

Administration<br />

2.2.3: Each park to have<br />

functional recreational centres<br />

by June 2011<br />

Administration<br />

2.3: Implement<br />

HIV/AIDS<br />

programme<br />

2.3.1: HIV/AIDS programme<br />

developed and operational by<br />

June 2009<br />

SO 2: Staff<br />

welfare and<br />

benefits<br />

improved<br />

Administration<br />

43


Objective<br />

Key Performance<br />

Indicators<br />

Increased<br />

species richness,<br />

distribution and<br />

diversity<br />

Strategy Target Functional<br />

Responsibility<br />

3.1: Make<br />

decisions based<br />

on researched<br />

information<br />

3.1.1: Research and ecological<br />

monitoring programme<br />

reviewed and operational by<br />

June 2009<br />

Ecological Monitoring<br />

3.2: Develop<br />

<strong>Parks</strong> System<br />

Plan<br />

3.1.2: Animal disease<br />

invatigation and control<br />

programme reviewed and<br />

operational by June 2009<br />

3.2.1: Key ecosystems are<br />

represented in the national<br />

park network by June 2013<br />

Veterinary Unit<br />

Planning<br />

3.2.2: Key wildlife<br />

corridors/dispersal areas<br />

secured by June 2013<br />

Outreach<br />

3.3: Develop<br />

water use<br />

guidelines<br />

3.3.1: Water development and<br />

management scheme<br />

developed and operational<br />

for 15 parks by June 2013<br />

SO 3:<br />

<strong>National</strong><br />

parks<br />

biodiversity<br />

and adjacent<br />

ecosystems<br />

effectively<br />

conserved<br />

Ecological Monitoring<br />

44


45<br />

Objective<br />

Key Performance<br />

Indicators<br />

Strategy Target Functional<br />

Responsibility<br />

3.4: Improve<br />

park resources<br />

protection<br />

system<br />

3.4.1: A comprehensive law<br />

enforcement programme<br />

developed and operational by<br />

December 2009<br />

Protection<br />

3.4.2: <strong>National</strong> Park Ordinance<br />

reviewed and enforced by<br />

June 2010<br />

Legal Services<br />

3.4.3:<br />

Trans- boundary collaboration<br />

mechanism developed and in<br />

use by December 2008<br />

Protection<br />

.4.4: Local and international<br />

obligations to improve<br />

resource protection met<br />

annually<br />

DG<br />

3.5: Implement<br />

waste<br />

management<br />

<strong>plan</strong><br />

3.5.1: Waste management <strong>plan</strong><br />

reviewed and operational by<br />

June 2010<br />

Planning


Objective<br />

Key Performance<br />

Indicators<br />

More avenues<br />

for income<br />

generation<br />

Increase in<br />

income generation<br />

thus self<br />

sufficiency to meet<br />

operations<br />

Increase in<br />

contribution to the<br />

Treasury<br />

Strategy Target Functional<br />

Responsibility<br />

4.1: Diversify<br />

and effectively<br />

promote tourism<br />

products and<br />

services<br />

4.1.1: Tourism marketing strategy<br />

reviewed and implemented<br />

by June 2009<br />

4.1.2: New tourism products<br />

developed and introduced by<br />

June 2009<br />

Tourism<br />

Planning<br />

4.1.3: Collaboration with key<br />

stakeholders strengthened and<br />

implemented by 2013<br />

Tourism<br />

4.1.4: Develop and implement<br />

tourism investment policy (to<br />

guide private investments) by<br />

December 2008<br />

Planning<br />

4.2: Invest in<br />

tourism and<br />

non-tourism<br />

ventures<br />

4.2.1: Develop and implement<br />

investment business <strong>plan</strong> by<br />

June 2009<br />

SO 4:<br />

Organizatio<br />

n’s potential<br />

for income<br />

generation<br />

fully<br />

realized<br />

Planning<br />

46


Key Performance<br />

Indicators<br />

Strategy Target Functional<br />

Responsibility<br />

4.3: Improve<br />

finance controls<br />

Objective<br />

Increased<br />

presence and<br />

movement of<br />

wildlife between<br />

core and<br />

surrounding areas<br />

Improved<br />

participation and<br />

collaboration<br />

Reduced<br />

conflicts<br />

5.1: Improve<br />

working<br />

relations<br />

4.3.1: An effective and efficient<br />

system for controlling income and<br />

expenditure improved and<br />

operational by June 2010<br />

5.1.1: Conservation education<br />

programme reviewed and<br />

operational by December 2008<br />

5.1.2: Modalities for continued<br />

dialogue with local<br />

communities and other key<br />

stakeholders reviewed and<br />

operationalized by December 2008<br />

Finance<br />

Outreach<br />

Outreach<br />

5.2: Contribute<br />

towards poverty<br />

reduction<br />

5.2.1: System for contribution to<br />

poverty reduction in adjacent<br />

communities developed and<br />

operational by December 2008<br />

Outreach<br />

5.2.2: Benefit sharing mechanisms<br />

reviewed and implemented by<br />

June 2009<br />

SO 5:<br />

Organizational<br />

partnerships<br />

with<br />

adjacent<br />

communities<br />

and key stakeholders<br />

in the<br />

management of<br />

parks and<br />

buffer zone<br />

resources<br />

improved<br />

Outreach<br />

47


48<br />

Objective<br />

Key Performance<br />

Indicators<br />

Strategy Target Functional<br />

Responsibility<br />

5.3: Establish<br />

partnerships<br />

5.3.1: Public-<br />

Private-Community<br />

Partnerships guidelines<br />

developed and operational by<br />

June 2009<br />

Outreach<br />

5.4: Minimize<br />

human-wildlife<br />

conflicts<br />

5.4.1: Conflict resolution mechanisms<br />

developed and operational<br />

by December 2009<br />

Outreach<br />

5.4.2: 15 <strong>National</strong> <strong>Parks</strong><br />

boundaries demarcated and<br />

marked by June 2013<br />

Protection<br />

5.4.3: Problem animals control<br />

programme developed and<br />

operational June 2009<br />

Protection


Key Performance<br />

Indicators<br />

Reduced<br />

operational costs and<br />

time<br />

Increased<br />

visitors<br />

experience<br />

Increased<br />

accessibility and use of<br />

parks<br />

Increased<br />

rationalization of<br />

institutional resources for<br />

management<br />

Increased<br />

productivity<br />

Timely and appropriate<br />

decisions<br />

Increased level of<br />

customer satisfaction<br />

Strategy Target Functional<br />

Responsibility<br />

6.1: Improve<br />

and develop<br />

infrastructure<br />

6.2: Enforce<br />

EIA in every<br />

physical<br />

development<br />

activity<br />

7.1: Install<br />

management<br />

system<br />

6.1.1: A development and<br />

maintenance programme for<br />

road network, airstrips, staff<br />

housing, offices, visitor<br />

centres and control gates<br />

prepared and operationalized<br />

by December 2008<br />

6.2.1: EIA and PEA<br />

guidelines reviewed and<br />

operational by June 2009<br />

7.1.1: Policy guidelines for<br />

<strong>plan</strong>ning and implementation<br />

of all programmes and <strong>plan</strong>s<br />

developed and operational by<br />

June 2009<br />

7.1.2: Existing GMP <strong>plan</strong>ning<br />

guidelines are updated by June<br />

2009<br />

7.1.3: 15 parks are managed<br />

according to approved GMPs by<br />

June 2013<br />

Civil<br />

Engineering<br />

Planning<br />

Planning<br />

Planning<br />

Objective<br />

SO 6:<br />

Infrastructure to<br />

achieve<br />

institutional<br />

conservation<br />

development<br />

goals developed<br />

and<br />

maintained<br />

Planning<br />

49<br />

SO 7:<br />

Management<br />

and<br />

implementation<br />

of<br />

programmes<br />

and <strong>plan</strong>s<br />

improved


50<br />

Objective<br />

Key Performance<br />

Indicators<br />

Strategy Target Functional<br />

Responsibility<br />

7.1.4: Approved CSP mid<br />

term externally reviewed and<br />

evaluated by June 2011<br />

Planning<br />

7.1.5 Staff open performance<br />

appraisal system introduced<br />

and institutionalized by June<br />

2009<br />

Human Resources<br />

7.1.6: Participatory policy<br />

and management decisions<br />

made annually<br />

DG<br />

7.2: Institute<br />

monitoring and<br />

evaluation<br />

7.2.1: Monitoring and<br />

Evaluation section<br />

established by June 2009<br />

Planning<br />

7.2.2: Monitoring and<br />

Evaluation manual<br />

developed and operational<br />

by June 2009<br />

Planning

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!