Lecture 9: Controllability and Observability - Illinois Institute of ...
Lecture 9: Controllability and Observability - Illinois Institute of ...
Lecture 9: Controllability and Observability - Illinois Institute of ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Pro<strong>of</strong> by Contradiction: Im(C(A, B)) ⊂ Im(W t )<br />
Pro<strong>of</strong>.<br />
• This means that for all s ∈ [0, t],<br />
d k<br />
ds k BT e AT s x = B T ( A T ) k<br />
e<br />
A T s x = 0<br />
• At s = 0, this implies B T ( A T ) k<br />
x = 0 for all k.<br />
• We conclude that<br />
x T [ B AB · · · A n−1 B ] = 0<br />
• Thus C(A, B) T x = 0, so x ∈ ker C(A, B) T . As before, this means<br />
x ∈ Im(C(A, B)) ⊥ .<br />
• We conclude that x ∉ Im(C(A, B)). This proves by contradiction that<br />
Im(C(A, B)) ⊂ Im(W t ).<br />
M. Peet <strong>Lecture</strong> 9: <strong>Controllability</strong> 6 / 15