17.01.2015 Views

Irradiation of Animal Feeds - Sterigenics

Irradiation of Animal Feeds - Sterigenics

Irradiation of Animal Feeds - Sterigenics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Food Safety<br />

<strong>Irradiation</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Animal</strong> <strong>Feeds</strong><br />

<strong>Irradiation</strong> is an effective microbial disinfection<br />

process for animal feeds. It is currently used<br />

in the United States for feeds for research and<br />

lab animals, and under FDA special permission<br />

letters, for dog chews to control microorganisms<br />

such as Salmonella. The irradiation <strong>of</strong> poultry<br />

feed for control <strong>of</strong> Salmonella is also approved by<br />

FDA (21 CFR § 579.40).<br />

Microbiological contamination <strong>of</strong> feed and<br />

feed ingredients is an animal health, human<br />

health and a food trade issue. <strong>Feeds</strong> are<br />

an important vector <strong>of</strong> microbial contaminants<br />

that can impair both animal health and various<br />

performance parameters. When the feed is<br />

destined for domestic pets, the presence<br />

<strong>of</strong> bacteria could affect the health <strong>of</strong> the pet’s<br />

human family. There have been several cases<br />

<strong>of</strong> children contracting Salmonellosis from<br />

handling dog chew treats. Additionally, the<br />

presence <strong>of</strong> microbiological contaminants can<br />

prevent the trade in feeds.<br />

Currently, 21 CFR § 579.22 provides for<br />

the irradiation <strong>of</strong> lab animal chow to 50 kGy,<br />

and Part 579.40 provides for poultry feed to<br />

25 kGy. There is no prescribed minimum dose<br />

for lab animal chow, but a minimum dose <strong>of</strong><br />

2.0 kGy has been prescribed for poultry feed<br />

in the regulation.<br />

<strong>Sterigenics</strong> Food Safety has prepared a petition<br />

to the US FDA–Center for Veterinary Medicine<br />

to approve the irradiation <strong>of</strong> animal feed to a<br />

maximum dose <strong>of</strong> 50 kGy.<br />

Irradiated <strong>Animal</strong> Feed Products<br />

In the United States, <strong>Sterigenics</strong> has been<br />

asked to assist feed companies and their<br />

customers to control microbial contamination<br />

<strong>of</strong> animal feeds. For example, in the past five<br />

years <strong>Sterigenics</strong> has been asked to irradiate:<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

animal protein feed components<br />

(from blood, eggs, organ meats and<br />

rendered products)<br />

plant protein feed components<br />

such as Brewer’s Yeast<br />

dog food (dry and semi-moist), including<br />

dog chews (such as pigs ears, bullwinkles,<br />

rawhide and similar items)<br />

aquaculture feeds and pet fish food<br />

various foods for zoo and aquarium<br />

animals and creatures<br />

high value starter diets for young animals<br />

(calf, swine)<br />

feeds for lab animals<br />

birdseed for wild and pet birds<br />

In the case <strong>of</strong> feeds destined for research<br />

animals, the industry has been able to work<br />

with manufacturers to produce sufficiently<br />

decontaminated, or even sterile feeds.<br />

In other countries, members <strong>of</strong> the contract<br />

irradiation industry have been asked to irradiate:<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

baled forage crops (such as Timothy hay)<br />

for race horses (currently commercially<br />

irradiated for trade between Australia<br />

and New Zealand)<br />

second quality grains for animal feeds<br />

birdseed (sometimes commercially<br />

irradiated in Canada as condition <strong>of</strong> entry)<br />

components <strong>of</strong> animal medicines (currently<br />

commercially irradiated in Thailand).<br />

In addition, we believe there are other animal<br />

feeds that could benefit from irradiation<br />

treatment that have not yet been identified.<br />

How Does <strong>Irradiation</strong> Work<br />

<strong>Irradiation</strong> is a physical process using approved<br />

sources <strong>of</strong> radiation (generating gamma energy,<br />

accelerated electrons or X-rays) to disinfect<br />

<strong>Sterigenics</strong> Food Safety 2015 Spring Road, Suite 650 Oak Brook, IL 60523 800.472.4508 www.sterigenics.com


<strong>Irradiation</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Animal</strong> <strong>Feeds</strong><br />

feeds. In this process, sufficient energy is<br />

absorbed by the feed to kill molds, bacteria,<br />

yeasts, insect pests and weed seeds.<br />

<strong>Irradiation</strong> is intended to disinfect feeds<br />

<strong>of</strong> microbial contamination, but since insect<br />

pests are generally more sensitive to radiation<br />

than bacteria (depending on life stage and<br />

other factors), they would usually be killed<br />

at any dose commercially used to control<br />

microbial contamination.<br />

Microbiological Effects <strong>of</strong> <strong>Irradiation</strong><br />

on Feed and Feed Components<br />

As a result <strong>of</strong> decades <strong>of</strong> research on the effects<br />

<strong>of</strong> irradiation, <strong>Sterigenics</strong> has a very complete<br />

understanding <strong>of</strong> the effect <strong>of</strong> irradiation on<br />

microbial contaminants. Most important is the<br />

general agreement in the microbiology research<br />

<strong>of</strong> the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> irradiation as a means to<br />

control microbial contamination in a wide<br />

variety <strong>of</strong> products.<br />

If we look at the detail <strong>of</strong> the research results<br />

on the effect <strong>of</strong> irradiating dry feeds, however,<br />

we do not, see an overwhelmingly consistent<br />

picture. <strong>Feeds</strong> and their ingredients vary<br />

considerably in formulation, moisture content,<br />

physical properties and bioburden.<br />

Reported D 10 values for many bacterial<br />

contaminants vary from 0.4 kGy to 2.2 kGy<br />

depending on the organism(s), type <strong>of</strong> feed and<br />

test conditions such as temperature. Where<br />

log reductions were reported, a dose range <strong>of</strong><br />

3.75-7.5 kGy was suggested to result in a 5-8<br />

log reduction in a number <strong>of</strong> bacteria<br />

(including Salmonella), and fungi. One study<br />

noted significantly lower doses were required<br />

for pelletized feeds versus non-pelletized feeds.<br />

Where the researchers noted effective<br />

sanitization doses, 5-8 kGy was considered to<br />

control coliforms; 8-15 kGy was advised to<br />

control all enterobacteria; 6.5 kGy eliminated<br />

Staphlococcus; and 2-4 kGy controlled Aspergillis.<br />

For sterility <strong>of</strong> lab animal chow, 25 kGy was<br />

recommended; that dose was also recommended<br />

in other experiments to decontaminate feeds<br />

that were probably quite contaminated.<br />

Our experience with spices, herbs, botanicals<br />

and other dry ingredients (which have a similar<br />

bioburden to many feeds, and also being<br />

relatively dry, have a similar dose response),<br />

tells us that, assuming initial bioburden levels<br />

are not unusually high, a minimum dose <strong>of</strong><br />

about 7 kGy is usually sufficient to achieve<br />

a level <strong>of</strong> decontamination that is acceptable to<br />

spice processors and their customers. However,<br />

we note that some spices, such as black pepper,<br />

known to have higher levels <strong>of</strong> contamination,<br />

<strong>of</strong>ten require a minimum dose <strong>of</strong> up to 20 kGy.<br />

Effects <strong>of</strong> <strong>Irradiation</strong> on Nutrient<br />

Value <strong>of</strong> <strong>Animal</strong> Feed<br />

The effect <strong>of</strong> irradiation on the nutrient value<br />

<strong>of</strong> the feed should be assessed as part <strong>of</strong> the dose<br />

determination before commercial processing<br />

begins. It is the manufacturers’ responsibility<br />

to ensure the nutrient value <strong>of</strong> the feed is not<br />

significantly compromised by the irradiation<br />

processing. Manufacturers <strong>of</strong> animal feeds<br />

should take note <strong>of</strong> radiation effects on key<br />

nutrients for the species being fed and<br />

supplement as necessary.<br />

Generally, the need to control microbiological<br />

contamination outranks the nutritional effects<br />

issue in decisions (since the nutrient content<br />

<strong>of</strong> animal feeds can be easily manipulated), but<br />

there are a few important issues that temper<br />

dose selection considerations.<br />

First, if the feed is destined for young animals<br />

or known-to-be-sensitive species (for example,<br />

starter feeds, aquaculture feeds for young fish<br />

or single diets for valuable zoo animals), where<br />

significant nutritional losses could result in<br />

problems with the fed species, we strongly<br />

advise the customer to test the nutritional value,<br />

focusing on nutrients that are both radiation<br />

<strong>Sterigenics</strong> Food Safety 2015 Spring Road, Suite 650 Oak Brook, IL 60523 800.472.4508 www.sterigenics.com


<strong>Irradiation</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Animal</strong> <strong>Feeds</strong><br />

sensitive and key nutrients for that species.<br />

We can work with the customer to advise them<br />

about the nutrients that are known to be<br />

radiation sensitive, but we rely on the customer<br />

to know the key nutrients for the fed species.<br />

Not all feed products are significant sources<br />

<strong>of</strong> nutrients (rawhide treats as an example),<br />

so nutrient assessment is not always a necessity.<br />

We also note that while organoleptic concerns<br />

are very important aspects in dose selection<br />

for human foods, this seems to be less <strong>of</strong><br />

a consideration for the irradiation <strong>of</strong> animal<br />

feeds. We would expect the manufacturer<br />

to ensure irradiation does not affect acceptance<br />

by the fed animal.<br />

Protein and Amino Acids<br />

Crude protein levels and total nitrogen contents<br />

have not been found to be affected by irradiation<br />

treatment in the range <strong>of</strong> animal feeds tested<br />

at dose levels even as high as 150 kGy.<br />

A number <strong>of</strong> authors studying a variety <strong>of</strong> feeds,<br />

including fishmeals, meat rendering products<br />

and cereal-based diets, reported that irradiation<br />

with doses as high as 100 kGy did not affect<br />

biological value. Small losses in protein value<br />

were found in some grain products but not<br />

fishmeal or spray-dried blood protein. Net<br />

protein utilization was generally not affected<br />

by irradiation treatment. Similarly, protein<br />

digestibility and nitrogen digestibility were, in<br />

most cases, unaffected by irradiation treatment.<br />

Total amino acid levels in animal feed rations<br />

are generally not affected by irradiation doses<br />

as high as 100 kGy. However, it is more critical<br />

to look at the effects <strong>of</strong> irradiation on individual<br />

amino acid concentrations to get a true measure<br />

<strong>of</strong> irradiation-induced changes. It is well known,<br />

for example, that different livestock and poultry<br />

species have different requirements for<br />

individual amino acids.<br />

In some studies, no changes in amino acid<br />

composition were reported even after irradiation<br />

doses up to 100 kGy. Additional information<br />

is available from <strong>Sterigenics</strong> on specific amino<br />

acid effects for the reader who wants more<br />

information on this aspect.<br />

Other studies have reported changes, however,<br />

and these differences may be related to variances<br />

in diet composition and varying analytical<br />

techniques. Many studies do not differentiate<br />

between total and available amount <strong>of</strong> an amino<br />

acid, making comparison <strong>of</strong> results between<br />

studies more difficult.<br />

Vitamins<br />

The effects <strong>of</strong> irradiation on vitamins are<br />

dependent on the formulation <strong>of</strong> the diet, the<br />

dose <strong>of</strong> irradiation and the particular vitamin.<br />

Conning (1983) suggested that at doses above<br />

25 kGy, vitamin supplementation would be<br />

required for commercial and laboratory animals<br />

to thrive normally on irradiated feeds.<br />

Vitamin A<br />

Vitamin A has been found to decrease in most<br />

animal feeds (including fish meal, pelleted rabbit<br />

feed and various rodent, chick, cat and pig diets)<br />

after irradiation with doses as low as 20 kGy.<br />

Effects appear to be diet dependent. Reductions<br />

<strong>of</strong> as much as 70% have been reported in<br />

cereal-based rat rations after doses <strong>of</strong> 45 kGy.<br />

Vacuum packaging may provide some protection<br />

against radiation effects.<br />

Beta carotene (precursor <strong>of</strong> vitamin A)<br />

The effects <strong>of</strong> radiation on beta carotene<br />

levels in various animal feeds are not consistent.<br />

A dose <strong>of</strong> 25 kGy reportedly had no effect<br />

on levels in lab mice diets. In contrast, doses<br />

<strong>of</strong> 20-50 kGy caused reductions ranging from<br />

13% to 100% in rabbit and chick diets.<br />

Vitamin B<br />

Several forms <strong>of</strong> the B vitamins have been<br />

studied including B1 (thiamine), B2 (rib<strong>of</strong>lavin),<br />

B5 (niacin), B6 (pyroxidine), B10 (biotin) and<br />

B12 (cyanocobalamin).<br />

Thiamine<br />

The sensitivity <strong>of</strong> thiamine to radiation<br />

treatment varies with the type <strong>of</strong> feed. In lab<br />

<strong>Sterigenics</strong> Food Safety 2015 Spring Road, Suite 650 Oak Brook, IL 60523 800.472.4508 www.sterigenics.com


<strong>Irradiation</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Animal</strong> <strong>Feeds</strong><br />

mice, chick and guinea pig diets, it has been<br />

reported that doses <strong>of</strong> up to 25-30 kGy caused<br />

no changes in thiamine content. However,<br />

doses as low as3-6 kGy have caused reductions<br />

in fish protein.<br />

Rib<strong>of</strong>lavin<br />

Rib<strong>of</strong>lavin is reportedly one <strong>of</strong> the most<br />

radiation resistant <strong>of</strong> the vitamins. No changes<br />

in rib<strong>of</strong>lavin levels were observed in lab mice<br />

diets after a dose <strong>of</strong> 25 kGy.<br />

Niacin<br />

Niacin is only slightly less resistant to irradiation<br />

than is rib<strong>of</strong>lavin. No reductions in niacin<br />

content were observed in lab mice or rat diets<br />

irradiated with up to 40 kGy, or in fish protein<br />

treated with doses up to 45 kGy.<br />

Pyroxidine<br />

Pyroxidine has a radiation sensitivity similar<br />

to thiamine. While no effects were observed<br />

in lab mice, chick and guinea pig diets treated<br />

with 25-30 kGy, reductions were observed in<br />

fish protein irradiated with doses as low as 3-6<br />

kGy. Doses <strong>of</strong> 50-70 kGy led to reductions<br />

<strong>of</strong> 15-21% in a range <strong>of</strong> feed types. The presence<br />

<strong>of</strong> antioxidants at particular concentrations may<br />

increase the level <strong>of</strong> pyroxidine destruction.<br />

Biotin<br />

Biotin generally has a high level <strong>of</strong> radiation<br />

resistance. No effects were observed in lab mice<br />

diets after a dose <strong>of</strong> 25 kGy, although a<br />

reduction was observed in wheat grain after<br />

treatment with 2 kGy.<br />

Cyanocobalamin<br />

Radiation generally causes only minimal losses<br />

<strong>of</strong> Vitamin B12. No change was observed in<br />

lab mice diets treated with 25 kGy and only<br />

a 7% loss was reported in various pig feeds<br />

treated with 50 kGy.<br />

Vitamin C<br />

A dose <strong>of</strong> 25 kGy led to a loss <strong>of</strong> 21% <strong>of</strong><br />

vitamin C in pelleted rabbit feed. A study on<br />

the effects <strong>of</strong> irradiation on Vitamin C must<br />

also measure dehydroascorbic acid. Radiation<br />

treatment induces oxidation <strong>of</strong> ascorbic acid<br />

to dehydroascorbic acid, a form that is equally<br />

biologically active.<br />

Vitamin D<br />

Vitamin D is generally more radiation resistant<br />

than vitamins A or E, particularly in high fat<br />

substrates. However, a dose <strong>of</strong> 20 kGy was<br />

found to cause a reduction <strong>of</strong> vitamin D content<br />

in fishmeal.<br />

Vitamin E<br />

Vitamin E is the most sensitive <strong>of</strong> the vitamins<br />

to radiation treatment. Losses were reported<br />

in fishmeal, rice bran, pelleted rabbit diets<br />

and pig feed after treatments ranging from<br />

20 kGy (fish meal) to 50 kGy (pig feed) and<br />

were as high as 60% (pig feed). However, other<br />

researchers reported that irradiation as high<br />

as 40 kGy did not affect vitamin E levels<br />

in rat and mice feeds.<br />

Results appear to be somewhat dependent<br />

on the type <strong>of</strong> vitamin E molecule present.<br />

Alphatocopherol, for instance, is less radiation<br />

sensitive than some other forms and has been<br />

recommended as a source <strong>of</strong> vitamin E<br />

enrichment for irradiated feeds. Results are diet<br />

dependent, but doses as high as 50 kGy have<br />

reportedly not caused alphatocopherol losses<br />

in pig, guinea pig or cat diets and only slight<br />

reductions in fish protein and chick diets.<br />

Alphatocotrienol has been suggested as the<br />

most sensitive <strong>of</strong> the E vitamers to radiation<br />

treatment, with 89% being destroyed following<br />

a dose <strong>of</strong> 15 kGy in rice bran.<br />

Vitamin K and folic acid<br />

A dose <strong>of</strong> 40 kGy led to a decrease <strong>of</strong> 76% in<br />

the level <strong>of</strong> vitamin K in rat and mouse feed.<br />

Doses <strong>of</strong> 20-30 kGy did not affect folic acid<br />

levels in chick or guinea pig cereal-based diets,<br />

but did cause a reduction in cat diets. A loss<br />

<strong>of</strong> 17% was reported in various pig diets after<br />

treatment with 50 kGy.<br />

<strong>Sterigenics</strong> Food Safety 2015 Spring Road, Suite 650 Oak Brook, IL 60523 800.472.4508 www.sterigenics.com


<strong>Irradiation</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Animal</strong> <strong>Feeds</strong><br />

Pantothenic acid<br />

Pantothenic acid has a radiation resistance level<br />

similar to that <strong>of</strong> the most radiation resistant<br />

vitamins. However, slight losses have been<br />

observed in wheat at levels as low as 0.2 kGy.<br />

No effects were observed after treatment <strong>of</strong> lab<br />

mice diets with a dose <strong>of</strong> 25 kGy. Similarly,<br />

a dose <strong>of</strong> 50 kGy led to only a 2% loss in sow,<br />

creep and hog feeds.<br />

Lipids<br />

The effects <strong>of</strong> irradiation on dietary lipids are<br />

dependent on lipid concentration, fatty acid<br />

composition, packaging, formulation <strong>of</strong> the diet<br />

and irradiation dose. Changes in fatty acid<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>iles and free fatty acid levels have been<br />

reported depending on the feed and<br />

irradiation dose.<br />

Peroxide value, a measure <strong>of</strong> the oxidative<br />

rancidity <strong>of</strong> the fat, has generally been shown<br />

to increase after irradiation treatment. In<br />

fishmeal irradiated with a dose <strong>of</strong> 14 kGy,<br />

peroxide levels almost doubled. However, in the<br />

same study, irradiation had no effect on levels<br />

in ready-mixed pig feeds or at a dose <strong>of</strong> 7 kGy.<br />

Increased levels were observed, however, in<br />

commercial cat diets irradiated with 25 kGy,<br />

poultry diets irradiated with 30-60 kGy and<br />

wheat irradiated with 5-500 kGy. Neither<br />

oxidized fatty acids or unsaturated fatty acid<br />

levels were affected by doses <strong>of</strong> 7-14 kGy<br />

applied to fishmeal or ready-mixed pig feed.<br />

A dose <strong>of</strong> 15 kGy resulted in increased levels<br />

<strong>of</strong> free fatty acids and a reduction in<br />

phospholipids in rice bran.<br />

Negative effects on organoleptic properties<br />

associated with dietary lipids have been reported<br />

after irradiation <strong>of</strong> wheat.<br />

Fiber<br />

<strong>Irradiation</strong> at high doses has been suggested<br />

as a means to break down the fiber contained in<br />

animal feeds, making them more digestible.<br />

Results will depend on the actual dosage and<br />

the composition <strong>of</strong> the feed being studied.<br />

<strong>Irradiation</strong> has been found to reduce crude fiber<br />

content in various types <strong>of</strong> feeds. Feed blocks<br />

irradiated with doses <strong>of</strong> 100 kGy also exhibited<br />

reductions in hemicellulose and neutraldetergent<br />

fiber concentrations. Organic matter<br />

digestibility and in vitro digestible energy both<br />

increased. Gross energy, cellulose, acid-detergent<br />

fiber and acid-detergent lignin were not affected<br />

by the irradiation treatment. Only slight<br />

changes were observed in acid detergent fiber<br />

and lignin in alfalfa hay, corn cobs, wheat bran<br />

and straw after irradiation treatment.<br />

Digestibility <strong>of</strong> crude fiber in pellets irradiated<br />

with a dose <strong>of</strong> 50 kGy decreased.<br />

While radiation treatment may lead to<br />

a reduction in feed particle size and enhance<br />

digestibility <strong>of</strong> the feed, there may also be<br />

a reduction in mean retention time in the<br />

digestive tract <strong>of</strong> the animals so that less<br />

nutrients are absorbed.<br />

Anti-nutritional Factors<br />

Some animal feeds naturally contain chemical<br />

compounds that are detrimental to animal<br />

growth and development. In some instances,<br />

these factors can be fully or partially eliminated<br />

by irradiation treatment. Safflower oilcake, for<br />

example, contains the proteinase inhibitors<br />

trypsin and chymotrypsin. A dose <strong>of</strong> less than<br />

1 kGy was sufficient to inactivate trypsin while<br />

chymotrypsin was still active after a dose <strong>of</strong><br />

10 kGy.<br />

Effects <strong>of</strong> Irradiated <strong>Feeds</strong><br />

on <strong>Animal</strong> Performance<br />

Several studies have been conducted looking at<br />

the effects <strong>of</strong> various types <strong>of</strong> irradiated feed on<br />

the performance <strong>of</strong> livestock, poultry and lab<br />

animals.<br />

Poultry<br />

An analysis <strong>of</strong> several irradiated poultry feed<br />

studies indicates that doses <strong>of</strong> irradiation up<br />

to approximately 25 kGy have no effect on<br />

growth parameters such as weight gain, feed<br />

utilization, consumption or efficiency, or egg<br />

<strong>Sterigenics</strong> Food Safety 2015 Spring Road, Suite 650 Oak Brook, IL 60523 800.472.4508 www.sterigenics.com


<strong>Irradiation</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Animal</strong> <strong>Feeds</strong><br />

number, weight or fertility. However, above<br />

25 kGy, some detrimental effects have been<br />

observed, in part because <strong>of</strong> degradation <strong>of</strong><br />

Vitamins A and D.<br />

Pigs<br />

While poultry generally are fed a cereal-based<br />

diet, the rations fed to pigs are more varied,<br />

ranging from fishmeal to cereals to meat<br />

rendering byproducts. Doses up to 50 kGy,<br />

however, have generally not been found<br />

to affect growth rate, feed intake or efficiency,<br />

weight gain, reproductive characteristics<br />

or piglet growth.<br />

Sheep<br />

Feeding merino sheep wheat and rice straw<br />

that had been irradiated with doses ranging<br />

from 250 kGy to 750 kGy resulted in reductions<br />

in voluntary feed intake, digestibility, nitrogen<br />

balance and rumenal volatile fatty acid<br />

production. Feed particle size was reduced by<br />

the radiation treatment but this advantage was<br />

<strong>of</strong>fset by a reduction in mean retention time<br />

<strong>of</strong> the feed in the digestive tract <strong>of</strong> the animals.<br />

Rats and mice<br />

Weight gain and reproductive characteristics<br />

<strong>of</strong> mice and rats were reportedly not affected by<br />

consumption <strong>of</strong> irradiated feed at 25 or 45 kGy.<br />

Effects on feed intake are less consistent. In<br />

contrast, heat treatment <strong>of</strong> diets has been found<br />

to reduce growth rates. In other experiments,<br />

no effects <strong>of</strong> feeding fish meal that had been<br />

treated with a dose <strong>of</strong> 8 kGy on organ weight,<br />

hematological, histological, enzymological<br />

or fertility characteristics were found.<br />

References<br />

1. Adler JH, Eisenberg E, Lapidot M, et al:<br />

Treatment <strong>of</strong> animal feeds with ionizing<br />

radiation: 2. Effects <strong>of</strong> gamma radicidation<br />

on the biological value <strong>of</strong> poultry feed.<br />

Food Preservation by <strong>Irradiation</strong>. Vol.2.<br />

International Symposium on Food Preservation<br />

by <strong>Irradiation</strong>; Wageningen (Netherlands); 21-25<br />

Nov 1977. International Atomic Energy Agency,<br />

Vienna (Austria): 243-54, 1978.<br />

2. Al Masri MR: Nutritive value <strong>of</strong> some feed<br />

blocks, as influenced by gamma irradiation.<br />

Agribiological Research 48:171-78, 1995.<br />

3. Badshah, Amal, Aurangzeb, Sattar A,<br />

Nizakat Bibi: Effect <strong>of</strong> irradiation and other<br />

processing methods on in-vitro digestibility<br />

<strong>of</strong> rapeseed protein. J Sci Food Agric<br />

61:273-75, 1993.<br />

4. Bhatty RS, Macgregor AW: Gamma<br />

irradiation <strong>of</strong> hulless barley: Effect on grain<br />

composition, beta-glucans and starch.<br />

Cereal Chem 65:463-70, 1988.<br />

5. Coates ME, Ford JE, Gregory ME, et al:<br />

Effects <strong>of</strong> gamma irradiation on the vitamin<br />

content <strong>of</strong> diets for laboratory animals.<br />

Lab Anim 3:39-49, 1969.<br />

6. Conning DM: Evaluation <strong>of</strong> the irradiation<br />

<strong>of</strong> animal feedstuffs. In Recent Advances in Food<br />

<strong>Irradiation</strong>. Elsevier Biomedical Press.<br />

247-83, 1983.<br />

7. Cox C, Nikolaiczuk N, Idziak, ES: Poultry<br />

feed radicidation: 2. Long and short term<br />

poultry feeding trials with irradiated poultry<br />

feeds. Poultry Sci 53:619-24, 1974.<br />

8. Eggum BO: Effect <strong>of</strong> radiation treatment<br />

on protein quality and vitamin content <strong>of</strong> animal<br />

feeds. Decontamination <strong>of</strong> <strong>Animal</strong> <strong>Feeds</strong> by<br />

<strong>Irradiation</strong>. Advisory Group Meeting on Radiation<br />

Treatment <strong>of</strong> <strong>Animal</strong> <strong>Feeds</strong>; S<strong>of</strong>ia (Bulgaria);<br />

17-21 Oct 1977. International Atomic Energy<br />

Agency, Vienna (Austria): 55-67, 1979.<br />

<strong>Sterigenics</strong> Food Safety 2015 Spring Road, Suite 650 Oak Brook, IL 60523 800.472.4508 www.sterigenics.com


<strong>Irradiation</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Animal</strong> <strong>Feeds</strong><br />

9. El-Moneim A, Afify RM, Shousha MA:<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> low-dose irradiation on soybean<br />

protein solubility, trypsin inhibitor activity, and<br />

protein patterns separated by polyacrylamide<br />

gel electrophoresis. J Agric Food Chem<br />

36:810-813, 1988.<br />

10. El Saadany RMA, El Saadany FM,<br />

Foda YH: Degradation <strong>of</strong> corn starch under the<br />

influence <strong>of</strong> gamma irradiation. Starch<br />

28:208-11, 1976.<br />

11. Farag MDEH: The nutritive value for chicks<br />

<strong>of</strong> fullfat soybeans irradiated at up to 60 kGy.<br />

Anim Feed Sci Technol 73:319-28, 1998.<br />

12. Ferrando R, Pantaleon J, Fromageot D:<br />

Comparative study <strong>of</strong> classical sterilization<br />

and radappertization on a feed for the rat.<br />

Ann Nutr Aliment. 22:25-27, 1968.<br />

13. Food and Drug Administration: <strong>Irradiation</strong><br />

in the Production, Processing, and Handling<br />

<strong>of</strong> Food. Final Rule. Federal Register 51 FR<br />

13376-13399, April 18, 1986.<br />

14. Ford DJ: The effect <strong>of</strong> methods <strong>of</strong><br />

sterilization on the nutritive value <strong>of</strong> protein<br />

in a commercial rat diet. Brit J Nutr 35:267-76,<br />

1976.<br />

15. Observations on the influence <strong>of</strong> irradiation<br />

on fat and vitamin A in dry laboratory cat diets.<br />

Decontamination <strong>of</strong> <strong>Animal</strong> <strong>Feeds</strong> by <strong>Irradiation</strong>.<br />

Advisory Group Meeting on Radiation Treatment<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>Animal</strong> <strong>Feeds</strong>; S<strong>of</strong>ia (Bulgaria); 17-21 Oct<br />

1977. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna<br />

(Austria): 77-81, 1976.<br />

16. Horvatic M, Gruner M: Effect <strong>of</strong> gamma<br />

irradiation on methionine and tryptophan<br />

content in soya protein products. Nahrung 37:<br />

147-52, 1993.<br />

17. Ito H, Iizuka H: Present status <strong>of</strong> radiation<br />

treatment <strong>of</strong> animal feeds in Japan.<br />

Decontamination <strong>of</strong> <strong>Animal</strong> <strong>Feeds</strong> by <strong>Irradiation</strong>.<br />

Advisory Group Meeting on Radiation Treatment<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>Animal</strong> <strong>Feeds</strong>; S<strong>of</strong>ia (Bulgaria); 17-21 Oct<br />

1977. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna<br />

(Austria): 15-31, 1979.<br />

18. Joseph A, Dikshit M: Effect <strong>of</strong> irradiation<br />

on the proteinase inhibitor activity and<br />

digestibility (in vitro) <strong>of</strong> safflower oilcake.<br />

Journal <strong>of</strong> the American Oil Chemists’ Society<br />

70:935-37, 1993.<br />

19. Kennedy TS: Studies on the nutritional<br />

value <strong>of</strong> foods treated with gamma radiation.<br />

I. Effects on some B-complex vitamins in egg<br />

and wheat. J Sci Food Agric 16:433-37, 1965a.<br />

20. Kennedy TS: Studies on the nutritional<br />

value <strong>of</strong> foods treated with gamma radiation.<br />

I. Effects on some B-complex vitamins in egg<br />

and wheat. J Sci Food Agric 16:81-84, 1965b.<br />

21. Kume T, Takehisa M: Effect <strong>of</strong> gamma–<br />

irradiation on lysinoalanine in various<br />

feedstuffs and model systems. J Agric Food Chem<br />

32:656-58, 1984.<br />

22. Leeson S, Marcotte M: <strong>Irradiation</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

poultry feed. 2. Effect on nutrient composition.<br />

World’s Poultry Science Journal 49:120-131, 1993.<br />

23. Ley FJ: Radiation processing <strong>of</strong> laboratory<br />

animal diet. Radiat Phys Chem 14:677-82, 1979.<br />

24. Matin MA, Amin MR, Rahman S, et al:<br />

Nutritional value <strong>of</strong> poultry feed<br />

decontaminated by irradiation. Indian Vet J<br />

62:251-54, 1985.<br />

25. McManus WR, Manta L, McFarlane JD,<br />

et al: The effect <strong>of</strong> diet supplements and gamma<br />

irradiation on dissimilation <strong>of</strong> low-quality<br />

roughages by ruminants: 3. Effects <strong>of</strong> feeding<br />

gamma-irradiated base diets <strong>of</strong> wheaten straw<br />

and rice straw to sheep. J Agric Sci 79:55-66,<br />

1972.<br />

26. Metta VC, Johnson BC: Biological value<br />

<strong>of</strong> gamma irradiated corn protein and wheat<br />

gluten. Agric Food Chem. 7:131-33, 1959.<br />

27. Mossel DAA: Perspectives for the use<br />

<strong>of</strong> ionizing radiation in the decontamination<br />

(Salmonella radicidation) <strong>of</strong> some frozen<br />

proteinaceous foods and dry mixed feed<br />

ingredients. In Food <strong>Irradiation</strong>. Proceedings<br />

<strong>of</strong> an FAO/IAEA Symposium. Karlsruhe,<br />

Germany. June 6-10, 1986: 365-80, 1986.<br />

28. Nadudvari I: Experience <strong>of</strong> radiation<br />

treatment <strong>of</strong> laboratory and farm animal feeds<br />

in Hungary. Decontamination <strong>of</strong> <strong>Animal</strong> <strong>Feeds</strong> by<br />

<strong>Irradiation</strong>. Advisory Group Meeting on Radiation<br />

Treatment <strong>of</strong> <strong>Animal</strong> <strong>Feeds</strong>; S<strong>of</strong>ia (Bulgaria);<br />

17-21 Oct 1977. International Atomic Energy<br />

Agency, Vienna (Austria): 33-41, 1979.<br />

<strong>Sterigenics</strong> Food Safety 2015 Spring Road, Suite 650 Oak Brook, IL 60523 800.472.4508 www.sterigenics.com


<strong>Irradiation</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Animal</strong> <strong>Feeds</strong><br />

29. Roushdi M., Fahmi AA, Sarhan M: Effect<br />

<strong>of</strong> gamma rays on corn grains. III. Effect <strong>of</strong><br />

post-irradiation storage on some technological<br />

properties <strong>of</strong> corn grains and fatty acids.<br />

Starch/Staerke 33: 163-65, 1981b.<br />

30. Roushdi M, Harras A, El Meligi A, et al:<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> high doses <strong>of</strong> gamma rays on corn<br />

grains. I. Influence on the chemical composition<br />

<strong>of</strong> whole grains and the technological process<br />

<strong>of</strong> starch and by-product isolation. Cereal Chem.<br />

58: 110-112, 1981a.<br />

31. Sandev S, Karaivanov I: The composition<br />

and digestibility <strong>of</strong> irradiated roughage.<br />

Decontamination <strong>of</strong> <strong>Animal</strong> <strong>Feeds</strong> by <strong>Irradiation</strong>.<br />

International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna<br />

(Austria)Advisory Group Meeting on Radiation<br />

Treatment <strong>of</strong> <strong>Animal</strong> <strong>Feeds</strong>; S<strong>of</strong>ia (Bulgaria);<br />

17-21 Oct 1977: 83-87, 1979.<br />

32. Shin TS, Godber JS: Changes <strong>of</strong><br />

endogenous antioxidants and fatty acid<br />

composition in irradiated rice bran during<br />

storage. J Agric Food Chem 44:567-73, 1996.<br />

33. Tipples KH, Norris FW: Some effects<br />

<strong>of</strong> high levels <strong>of</strong> gamma irradiation on the lipids<br />

<strong>of</strong> wheat. Cereal Chem. 42:437-51, 1965.<br />

34. Vijayalaxmi: Cytogenetic studies in monkeys<br />

fed irradiated wheat. Toxicology 9:181-84, 1978.<br />

35. Wang GJ, Marquardt RR, Guenter W, et al:<br />

Effects <strong>of</strong> enzyme supplementation and<br />

irradiation <strong>of</strong> rice bran on the performance<br />

<strong>of</strong> growing Leghorn and broiler chickens.<br />

Anim Feed Sci Technol 66:47-61, 1997.<br />

<strong>Sterigenics</strong> Food Safety 2015 Spring Road, Suite 650 Oak Brook, IL 60523 800.472.4508 www.sterigenics.com

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!