18.01.2015 Views

Quantum Field Theory I

Quantum Field Theory I

Quantum Field Theory I

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1.3. RELATIVITY AND QUANTUM THEORY 43<br />

The Hilbert space spanned over the eigenvectors |p,σ〉 of the translation<br />

generators P µ is not the only possible choice of a playground for the relativistic<br />

quantum theory. Another quite natural Hilbert space is provided by the functions<br />

ϕ(x). A very simple representation of the Poincaré group is obtained by<br />

the mapping<br />

ϕ(x) → ϕ(Λx+a)<br />

This means that with any Poincaré transformation x → Λx+a one simply pulls<br />

back the functions in accord with the transformation. It is almost obvious that<br />

this, indeed, is a representation (if not, check it in a formal way). Actually,<br />

this representation is equivalent to the scalar representation discussed above, as<br />

we shall see shortly. (Let us remark that more complicated representations can<br />

be defined on n-component functions, where the components are mixed by the<br />

transformation in a specific way.)<br />

It is straightforward to work out the generators in this representation (and<br />

we shall need them later on). The changes of the space-time position x µ and<br />

the function ϕ(x) by the infinitesimal Poincaré transformation are δx µ and<br />

δx µ ∂ µ ϕ(x) respectively, from where one can directly read out the Poincaré<br />

generators in this representation<br />

J i ϕ(x) = (J i x) µ ∂ µ ϕ(x)<br />

K i ϕ(x) = (K i x) µ ∂ µ ϕ(x)<br />

P µ ϕ(x) = i∂ µ ϕ(x)<br />

Using the explicit knowledge of the generators J i and K i one obtains<br />

J i ϕ(x) = i 2 ε (<br />

ijk δ<br />

µ<br />

j η kν −δ µ k η jν)<br />

x ν ∂ µ ϕ(x) = −iε ijk x j ∂ k ϕ(x)<br />

K i ϕ(x) = i(δ µ i η 0ν −δ µ 0 η iν)x ν ∂ µ ϕ(x) = ix 0 ∂ i ϕ(x)−ix i ∂ 0 ϕ(x)<br />

or even more briefly ⃗ J ϕ(x) = −i⃗x×∇ϕ(x) and ⃗ Kϕ(x) = it∇ϕ(x)−i⃗x ˙ϕ(x).<br />

Atthispointthereadermaybetempted tointerpretϕ(x) asawave-function<br />

of the ordinary quantum mechanics. There is, however, an important difference<br />

between what have now and the standard quantum mechanics. In the usual formulation<br />

ofthe quantum mechanicsin termsofwave-functions, the Hamiltonian<br />

is specified as a differential operator (with space rather than space-time derivatives)<br />

acting on the wave-function ϕ(x). Our representation of the Poincaré<br />

algebra did not provide any such Hamiltonian, it just states that the Hamiltonian<br />

is the generator of the time translations.<br />

However, if one is really keen to interpret ϕ(x) as the wave-function, one<br />

is allowed to do so 44 . Then one may try to specify the Hamiltonian for this<br />

irreducible representation by demanding p 2 = m 2 for any eigenfunction e −ipx .<br />

44 In that case, it is more conveniet to define the transformation as push-forward, i.e. by<br />

the mapping ϕ(x) → ϕ ( Λ −1 (x−a) ) . With this definition one obtains P µ = −i∂ µ with the<br />

exponentials e −ipx being the eigenstates of these generators. These eigenstates could/should<br />

play the role of the |p〉 states. And, indeed,<br />

e −ipx → e −ipΛ−1 (x−a) = e −iΛ−1 Λp.Λ −1 (x−a) = e i(Λp)(x−a) = e −ia(Λp) e ix(Λp)<br />

which is exactly the transformation of the |p〉 state.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!