teaching - Earth Science Teachers' Association
teaching - Earth Science Teachers' Association
teaching - Earth Science Teachers' Association
Transform your PDFs into Flipbooks and boost your revenue!
Leverage SEO-optimized Flipbooks, powerful backlinks, and multimedia content to professionally showcase your products and significantly increase your reach.
<strong>teaching</strong><br />
EARTH<br />
SCIENCES<br />
Journal of the EARTH SCIENCE TEACHERS’ ASSOCIATION<br />
Volume 27 ● Number 3, 2002 ● ISSN 0957-8005<br />
www.esta-uk.org
th <strong>Science</strong><br />
ache<br />
<strong>Earth</strong> <strong>Science</strong><br />
Activities and<br />
<strong>Earth</strong>quakes<br />
Response to the<br />
<strong>Science</strong> and<br />
inquiry into the<br />
Kingston 2001<br />
Book Reviews<br />
Websearch<br />
Browne<br />
Teaching <strong>Earth</strong> <strong>Science</strong>s: Guide for Authors<br />
The Editor welcomes articles of any length and nature and on any topic related to<br />
<strong>Earth</strong> science education from cradle to grave. Please inspect back copies of TES,<br />
from Issue 26(3) onwards, to become familiar with the journal house-style.<br />
Three paper copies of major articles are requested. Please use double line spacing<br />
and A4 paper and please use SI units throughout, except where this is inappropriate<br />
(in which case please include a conversion table). The first paragraph of each<br />
major article should not have a subheading but should either introduce the reader<br />
to the context of the article or should provide an overview to stimulate interest. This<br />
is not an abstract in the formal sense. Subsequent paragraphs should be grouped<br />
under sub-headings.<br />
Text<br />
Please also supply the full text on disk or as an email attachment: Microsoft Word<br />
is the most convenient, but any widely-used wordprocessor is acceptable.<br />
References<br />
Please use the following examples as models<br />
(1) Articles<br />
Mayer, V. (1995) Using the <strong>Earth</strong> system for integrating the science curriculum.<br />
<strong>Science</strong> Education, 79(4), pp. 375-391.<br />
(2) Books<br />
McPhee, J. (1986 ) Rising from the Plains. New York: Fraux, Giroux & Strauss.<br />
(3) Chapters in books<br />
Duschl, R.A. & Smith, M.J. (2001) <strong>Earth</strong> <strong>Science</strong>. In Jere Brophy (ed), Subject-<br />
Specific Instructional Methods and Activities, Advances in Research on Teaching. Volume 8,<br />
pp. 269-290. Amsterdam: Elsevier <strong>Science</strong>.<br />
To Advertise in<br />
<strong>teaching</strong><br />
EARTH<br />
SCIENCES<br />
<strong>teaching</strong><br />
EARTH<br />
SCIENCES<br />
Journal of the EARTH SCIENCE TEACHERS’ ASSOCIATION<br />
Volume 26 ● Number 4, 2001 ● ISSN 0957-8005<br />
Your President<br />
Introduced<br />
Martin Whiteley<br />
Thinking Geology:<br />
Activities to Develop<br />
Thinking Ski ls in<br />
Geology Teaching<br />
Recovering the<br />
Leaning Tower of Pisa<br />
Demonstrations:<br />
House of Commons<br />
Technology Commi tee<br />
<strong>Science</strong> Cu riculum for<br />
14 - 19 year olds<br />
Se ting up a local<br />
group - West Wales<br />
Geology Teachers’<br />
Network<br />
Highlights from the<br />
post-16 ‘bring and<br />
share’ session a the<br />
ESTA Conference,<br />
ESTA Conference<br />
update<br />
News and Resources<br />
www.esta-uk.org<br />
Journal of the EARTH SCIENCE TEACHERS’ ASSOCIATION<br />
Volume 27 ● Number 1, 2002 ● ISSN 0957-8005<br />
Telephone<br />
Ian Ray<br />
0161 486 0326<br />
<strong>teaching</strong><br />
EARTH<br />
SCIENCES<br />
rth <strong>Science</strong><br />
chers’ Asso<br />
www.esta-uk.org<br />
Creationism and<br />
Evolution:<br />
Questions in the<br />
Classroom<br />
Institute of Biology<br />
Chemistry on the<br />
High Street<br />
Peter Kenne t<br />
<strong>Earth</strong> <strong>Science</strong><br />
Activities and<br />
Demonstrations:<br />
Fossils and Time<br />
Mike Tuke<br />
Beyond Petroleum:<br />
Business and<br />
The Environment in<br />
the 21st Century John<br />
Using Foam Rubber in<br />
an Aquarium To<br />
Simulate Plate-<br />
Tectonic And Glacial<br />
Phenomena<br />
John Wheeler<br />
Dorset and East<br />
Devon Coast:<br />
World Heritage Site<br />
ESTA Conference<br />
Update<br />
New ESTA Members<br />
Websearch<br />
News and Resources<br />
(including ESTA AGM)<br />
Figures<br />
Prepared artwork must be of high quality and submitted on paper and disk. Handdrawn<br />
and hand-labelled diagrams are not normally acceptable, although in some<br />
circumstances this is appropriate. Each figure must be submitted as a separate file.<br />
Photographs<br />
Please submit colour or black-and-white photographs as originals. They are also<br />
welcomed in digital form on disk or as email attachments: .jpeg format is to be preferred.<br />
Please use one file for each photograph.<br />
Copyright<br />
There are no copyright restrictions on original material published in Teaching <strong>Earth</strong><br />
<strong>Science</strong>s if it is required for use in the classroom or lecture room. Copyright material<br />
reproduced in TES by permission of other publications rests with the original<br />
publisher. Permission must be sought from the Editor to reproduce original material<br />
from Teaching <strong>Earth</strong> <strong>Science</strong>s in other publications and appropriate acknowledgement<br />
must be given.<br />
All articles submitted should be original unless indicted otherwise and should<br />
contain the author’s full name, title and address (and email address where relevant).<br />
They should be sent to the Editor,<br />
Dr Roger Trend<br />
School of Education<br />
University of Exeter<br />
Exeter EX1 2LU<br />
UK<br />
Tel 01392 264768<br />
Email R.D.Trend@exeter.ac.uk<br />
Editor<br />
WHERE IS PEST<br />
PEST is printed as the<br />
centre 4 pages in<br />
Teaching <strong>Earth</strong> <strong>Science</strong>s.
Journal of the EARTH SCIENCE TEACHERS’ ASSOCIATION<br />
Volume 27 ● Number 3, 2002 ● ISSN 0957-8005<br />
www.esta-uk.org<br />
TEACHING EARTH SCIENCES ● Volume 27 ● Number 3, 2002<br />
<strong>teaching</strong><br />
EARTH<br />
SCIENCES<br />
Teaching <strong>Earth</strong> <strong>Science</strong>s is published quarterly by<br />
the <strong>Earth</strong> <strong>Science</strong> Teachers’ <strong>Association</strong>. ESTA<br />
aims to encourage and support the <strong>teaching</strong> of<br />
<strong>Earth</strong> <strong>Science</strong>s, whether as a single subject or as<br />
part of science or geography courses.<br />
Full membership is £25.00; student and retired<br />
membership £12.50.<br />
Registered Charity No. 1005331<br />
Editor<br />
Dr. Roger Trend<br />
School of Education<br />
University of Exeter<br />
Exeter EX1 2LU<br />
Tel: 01392 264768<br />
Email: R.D.Trend@exeter.ac.uk<br />
Advertising<br />
Ian Ray<br />
5 Gathill Close<br />
Cheadle Hulme<br />
Cheadle<br />
Cheshire SK8 6SJ<br />
Tel: 0161 486 0326<br />
Reviews Editor<br />
Dr. Denis Bates<br />
Institute of Geography and <strong>Earth</strong> <strong>Science</strong>s<br />
University of Wales<br />
Aberystwyth<br />
Dyfed SY23 3DB<br />
Tel: 01970 622639<br />
Email: deb@aber.ac.uk<br />
Council Officers<br />
President<br />
Martin Whiteley<br />
Barrisdale Limited<br />
Bedford<br />
Chairman<br />
Geraint Owen<br />
Department of Geography<br />
University of Swansea<br />
Singleton Park<br />
Swansea SA2 8PP<br />
Secretary<br />
Dr. Dawn Windley<br />
Thomas Rotherham College<br />
Moorgate, Rotherham<br />
South Yorkshire<br />
Membership Secretary<br />
Owain Thomas<br />
PO Box 10, Narberth<br />
Pembrokeshire SA67 7YE<br />
Treasurer<br />
Geoff Hunter<br />
6 Harborne Road<br />
Tackley, Kidlington<br />
Oxon OX5 3BL<br />
Contributions to future issues of Teaching <strong>Earth</strong><br />
<strong>Science</strong>s will be welcomed and should be<br />
addressed to the Editor.<br />
Opinions and comments in this issue are the<br />
personal views of the authors and do not<br />
necessarily represent the views of the <strong>Association</strong>.<br />
Designed by Character Design<br />
Highridge, Wrigglebrook Lane, Kingsthorne<br />
Hereford HR2 8AW<br />
CONTENTS<br />
66 Editorial<br />
Roger Trend<br />
68 Hydrogeology, Pollution and Cemeteries<br />
Mike Lelliott<br />
74 Mass Extinctions:<br />
The Alternatives to “Deep Impact”<br />
Rosalind V. White<br />
78 Fossils Under the Microscope<br />
Ian Wilkinson<br />
85 The Stone Tapes:<br />
Building Stones in the History of the City of<br />
Nottingham<br />
Graham Lott<br />
89 Lost Worlds:<br />
How Exceptional Fossils Reveal the Past<br />
Mark Williams<br />
94 From Flood to Drought and Back Again<br />
Brian Waters<br />
96 ESTA Conference 2003<br />
97 Reviews<br />
98 ESTA Diary<br />
99 Websearch<br />
101 News and Resources<br />
<strong>teaching</strong><br />
EARTH<br />
SCIENCES<br />
Visit our website at www.esta-uk.org<br />
Front cover:<br />
Key Stage 2 children exploring the rock<br />
shelves, National Stone Centre. Note<br />
that hard hats are not required!<br />
Photo Ian Thomas. See page 101.<br />
Back cover:<br />
The snout of the Porito Moreno glacier<br />
and Lago Argentino in Patagonia,<br />
southern Argentina.<br />
Photo: Martin Whiteley<br />
65 www.esta-uk.org
TEACHING EARTH SCIENCES ● Volume 27 ● Number 3, 2002<br />
Editorial<br />
Afew weeks ago the BBC broadcast a peak-time<br />
television programme called something like<br />
“Fifty Places You Must Visit before You Die”,<br />
comprising the 50 most popular holiday locations<br />
according to some kind of viewer survey. Of course, I<br />
won’t bore or insult you by going through the usual<br />
caveats, (unrepresentative sample, inconsistent selection<br />
criteria etc.), but they are probably more relevant<br />
here than with most other data sources! Nevertheless,<br />
and remaining fully cognisant of the distinguishing<br />
characteristics of sound academic enquiry, I have on<br />
your behalf analysed the research data comprehensively,<br />
rigorously, statistically and exhaustively (not to mention<br />
exhaustingly). I have come up with some amazing<br />
facts that should cheer the hearts of those who seek<br />
after truth, including those committed to <strong>Earth</strong> science<br />
I had to determine if Iceland was ranked at 44<br />
because of its diverse and spectacular geological<br />
phenomena or because of its unique and equally<br />
spectacular socio-economic and cultural attractions.<br />
Similarly, what attracted respondents to Hawaii:<br />
the volcanoes or the surfing beaches<br />
education. There is, however, one major weakness in<br />
this academic investigation which might throw into<br />
question the reliability of the findings. This weakness is<br />
the fact that I, the objective and wholly impartial<br />
researcher engaged in this study, have been unsuccessful<br />
in my quest for research funds to allow me to investigate<br />
at first hand each and every location. This<br />
difficulty has prevented me from obtaining muchneeded<br />
supportive data to facilitate triangulation, and is,<br />
of course, a reflection of the very low esteem in which<br />
such high-quality, esoteric, academic research of this<br />
kind is generally held.<br />
Method<br />
The programme was watched, with a cup of coffee to<br />
hand, or was it tea Pencil and paper also figured in the<br />
data-collection instrument.<br />
Results and Analysis<br />
Taking the fifty locations in total, the Grand Canyon is<br />
top, the Great Barrier Reef is second, South Island<br />
New Zealand is fourth and Table Mountain is fifth. If<br />
you really want to know the third most popular location,<br />
please see the bottom of the next page where it is<br />
printed small and inverted. Needless to say, many of<br />
the world’s cities are in the list, such as Sydney at 8,<br />
New York at 9, Venice at 18 and Paris at 27. Specific<br />
buildings or historical settlements also figure large,<br />
such as the Taj Mahal at 10, Machu Picchu at 14,<br />
Angkor Wat at 29 and Abu Simbel at 48.<br />
Each location was painstakingly analysed to determine<br />
its relative <strong>Earth</strong> science content. This was a<br />
major element in the research project because it<br />
involved probing respondents’ minds in a systematic<br />
way in order to expose their perceptions of the places.<br />
This was particularly demanding because I had no<br />
access whatsoever to the respondents... For example, I<br />
had to determine if Iceland was ranked at 44 because<br />
of its diverse and spectacular geological phenomena or<br />
because of its unique and equally spectacular socioeconomic<br />
and cultural attractions. Similarly, what<br />
attracted respondents to Hawaii: the volcanoes or the<br />
surfing beaches<br />
For current readers the most significant “locale<br />
group” (a norm-referenced multi-variate artefact developed<br />
by my research team specifically for this project)<br />
comprises those places which are perceived as being<br />
attractive essentially because of their geological or geomorphological<br />
features: examples include Grand<br />
Canyon at 1, Great Barrier Reef at 2, South Island New<br />
Zealand at 4, Table Mountain at 5, Lake Louise at 11,<br />
Uluru at 12, Yosemite at 23, North Island New Zealand<br />
at 25, Alaska at 28, Everest at 30 and the Matterhorn at<br />
46. This group is labelled Downright Geological. A similar<br />
locale group (Diluted Geology) comprises places similar<br />
to these but with rather less domination by the<br />
geology: Galapagos at 33 (don’t forget all that biology:<br />
marine iguanas, finches, giant tortoises etc.) and Sri<br />
Lanka (think of all those non-geological elephants, trees<br />
and tea plantations) at 41 exemplify this category.<br />
Another important <strong>Earth</strong> science locale group comprises<br />
the Waterfalls, with no fewer than 4 on the list:<br />
Niagara at 15, Victoria at 21, Iguacu at 26 and Angel at<br />
47. A final <strong>Earth</strong> science grouping comprises historical<br />
or cultural places which possess significant geological<br />
elements, such as Petra at 16, Machu Picchu at 14, the<br />
Great Wall of China at 20 and the Terracotta Army at 45.<br />
This last group is labelled Building on Geology.<br />
The following table summarises the data according<br />
to locale group. Note that the four geology-related<br />
groups contain 31 places, being 62% of the total. This is<br />
more than half: an amazing and wholly-unexpected<br />
finding which has clear implications for curriculum<br />
Locale Group<br />
Frequency<br />
Urban Delights 13<br />
Downright Geological 13<br />
Building on Geology 10<br />
Tropical Paradise 5<br />
Waterfalls 4<br />
Diluted Geology 4<br />
Other (see bottom of next page) 1<br />
www.esta-uk.org<br />
66
TEACHING EARTH SCIENCES ● Volume 27 ● Number 3, 2002<br />
planning not only across the sciences but also in business<br />
& finance, travel, and leisure & tourism.<br />
The above analysis treats each rank as of equal value,<br />
but clearly a position of 3 is much better than one of 46.<br />
The mean rank of all the Downright Geological places<br />
(n=13) is 19.53 whereas that for Urban Delights<br />
(n=13) is far higher, at 26.84. This is unequivocal evidence<br />
that the world’s holiday-makers prefer visiting<br />
geological sites than drab and boring cities such as Sydney,<br />
Venice and Barcelona. Only the Other category has<br />
a higher rank than all of the geological categories, a<br />
wholly inexplicable and somewhat worrying finding.<br />
Implications of the Findings<br />
The implications of the results presented above are<br />
clearly very significant for the <strong>Earth</strong> science education<br />
community, and beyond, but it is not possible<br />
here to examine them at the length and depth warranted:<br />
such an analysis belongs in a high-status academic<br />
journal read by 12 very clever people<br />
worldwide rather than in TES which is read by many<br />
hundreds of practitioners. Nevertheless, some tentative<br />
conclusions are offered in all humility and the<br />
following ones might be drawn from this analysis. I<br />
present them as options to be considered.<br />
1. We can learn nothing whatsoever from these data: far<br />
more research is needed... and soon.<br />
2. <strong>Earth</strong> science figures large in the perceptions of people<br />
who both watch television and take overseas holidays.<br />
We have no reliable data on such perceptions<br />
among people who only engage in one of these two<br />
activities. These subjects do not actually think of<br />
themselves as being keen on geology, possibly<br />
because of its perceived connections with anoraks, so<br />
most are actually unaware of this <strong>Earth</strong> science orientation<br />
in their perceptions. However, if they were<br />
to become aware of it they would probably switch<br />
their holidays to Paris, Venice and Rome, with obvious<br />
implications for those places.<br />
3. <strong>Earth</strong> science teachers should take over responsibility<br />
for all courses in travel, leisure and tourism<br />
and the balance of content within such courses<br />
should be adjusted to match the expressed interests<br />
of the punters.<br />
4. Package tour operators should insist that all their<br />
representatives are <strong>Earth</strong> science graduates and their<br />
professional training within the tour company<br />
should involve refresher courses every year to ensure<br />
they are up-to-date (for example, do all current reps<br />
know if birds really are descendants of dinosaurs).<br />
5. Package tour representatives should be provided<br />
with scripts prepared by true experts in the field. An<br />
example follows: “Good afternoon, welcome to Majerife,<br />
and I hope you had a good flight from Gatwick. My name<br />
is Shelly and our coach driver today is Juan. We now have a<br />
50-minute drive to your hotel complex, so just sit back and<br />
relax. Make sure you go to the Welcome Meeting tomorrow<br />
morning at 6.15 a.m. where we will be telling you all about<br />
the local evidence for the Carnian-Norian extinction event,<br />
the latest interpretation of the ultramafic xenoliths in the<br />
alkali basalts which underlie the resort and, of course, the<br />
classic overstep shown in the unconformity in the hills behind<br />
your hotel. The meeting will finish by 3 p.m. so there will be<br />
plenty of time for a swim in the pool... Quick ,if you look out<br />
of the left side of the coach now you can see the quarry where<br />
the well-exposed ophiolite sequence gives us terrific evidence<br />
for the little-understood Tommotian collision...”<br />
6. Authorities keen to attract new tourists to particular<br />
locations should emphasise the geological features<br />
and ignore cultural and historical factors. It is even<br />
debatable if climatological and meteorological variables<br />
(often referred to in popular literature as “the<br />
weather”) should figure in their promotional material<br />
since the evidence presented here suggests it is<br />
totally irrelevant to the average holiday-maker<br />
(Everest, Iceland, Alaska).<br />
7. <strong>Earth</strong> science courses should be re-configured to<br />
accommodate these findings. This may be done in<br />
several ways. More full degree courses (or compulsory<br />
modules) are needed with titles such as “With<br />
Rocks In Mind: choosing your holiday destination<br />
from an informed position” and “From Here to<br />
Ibiza: hydrological, palaeontological and mineralogical<br />
opportunities for all”.<br />
Roger Trend<br />
Answer. Walt Disney World<br />
67 www.esta-uk.org
TEACHING EARTH SCIENCES ● Volume 27 ● Number 3, 2002<br />
Hydrogeology, Pollution and Cemeteries<br />
MIKE LELLIOTT<br />
A large step forward towards water awareness was reached in August 2002 with the UN Secretary<br />
General, Kofi Annan, identifying that “water is a fundamental resource for sustaining life and for<br />
conserving the natural environment” (World Summit on Sustainable Development). A lack of<br />
management in the evaluation, provision and use of water resources was identified as the basis<br />
to water problems seen in many countries. Water resources have to be managed to provide<br />
sufficient safe water for drinking, adequate sanitation facilities, food production, industry and<br />
many other purposes; but not removing excessive water to effect the ecological functions of<br />
wetlands and other ecosystems. Good management stems from a clear understanding of water<br />
and the issues facing water. This article aims to increase understanding of water, and more<br />
specifically “groundwater”, on two fronts; firstly, the origins and movement of water, and<br />
secondly the pollution of water.<br />
The Hydrological Cycle<br />
Every year about 110 million million cubic metres of<br />
water falls as precipitation on the land area of the<br />
<strong>Earth</strong> (Price, 1996). If all the water in the atmosphere<br />
were to fall as rain in one event it would produce an<br />
average of about 25 mm of rainfall over the total surface<br />
of the <strong>Earth</strong>. In an average year it is estimated that<br />
1000 mm of rain falls over the entire surface of the<br />
<strong>Earth</strong>, which means about 40 cycles of condensation<br />
and rainfall over a period of a year. This equates to 1<br />
cycle approximately every 10 days, which in the UK<br />
climate is all too believable. If all this water is falling,<br />
and there is no apparent loss of water from the<br />
oceans, then it must be being recycled. This recycling<br />
of water is explained by the water cycle, which is simply<br />
a system of water transferral between stores, wellknown<br />
to readers. The ocean is the largest store of<br />
water, but water molecules may also spend periods of<br />
time stored in ice caps, or in the pore spaces of rocks.<br />
The exception to this is for very small water losses in<br />
the upper atmosphere to hydrogen and oxygen, and<br />
broken down by plants during photosynthesis to help<br />
form carbohydrates.<br />
A large amount of precipitation occurs over the<br />
ocean, and consequently short circuits the water cycle.<br />
Water precipitated over land may take several routes<br />
through the remainder of the cycle. Some will be intercepted<br />
by foliage, and held on the leaves of trees and<br />
plants until it evaporates. Some will fall on impermeable<br />
surfaces such as certain rocks or man made constructions<br />
and can either collects in puddles and<br />
evaporates, or run off into natural or artificial drainage<br />
channels. The remainder of water falls directly on soil,<br />
with movement largely controlled by the soil type and<br />
condition, of which movement can be divided into<br />
three broad groups (Price, 1996):<br />
● Water evaporated directly or by transpiration from<br />
vegetation (Evapotranspiration)<br />
● Run over soil surface (overland flow) or in the near<br />
surface soil (interflow) until it reaches a ditch or<br />
stream<br />
● Or may soak into deeper layers of soil and perhaps<br />
into the underlying rock<br />
If the soil is dry and rainfall is light, all water reaching<br />
the ground will infiltrate into the soil and be held there<br />
as films of moisture which surround individual soil<br />
particles. This water is held in the soil until it is either<br />
evaporated directly or taken up by plants. As each successive<br />
layer of soil absorbs water, infiltration moves on<br />
downward, through the unsaturated zone until the<br />
infiltration reaches the water table and joins groundwater<br />
in the saturated zone. The precipitation that<br />
reaches the water table is termed recharge.<br />
The maximum rate at which water can enter the soil<br />
is called the infiltration capacity of the soil (Price,<br />
1996). If the rain is exceptionally heavy, if the soil has a<br />
low infiltration capacity, or if the ground is already saturated<br />
then a situation can arise where the infiltration<br />
capacity is exceeded. This results in overland flow.<br />
Overland flow is relatively rare and can often flow over<br />
short distances before sinking into soil elsewhere.<br />
If rocks beneath the soil are impermeable, or if there<br />
is contrasting permeability within the soil there will be<br />
a tendency for interflow, where water moves laterally<br />
through the unsaturated zone until arriving at streams<br />
or drains.<br />
Water that reaches the water table becomes groundwater.<br />
So what is groundwater The simplest definition<br />
is that groundwater is water contained in saturated soil<br />
and rock material below the surface of the earth. This<br />
groundwater then percolates slowly though the aquifer<br />
at rates varying from metres per day to millimetres per<br />
year (see Figure 1). The groundwater moves towards an<br />
outlet, which is usually a point where the water table<br />
intersects the ground surface, such as a river or spring<br />
www.esta-uk.org<br />
68
TEACHING EARTH SCIENCES ● Volume 27 ● Number 3, 2002<br />
or induced by abstraction. These are collectively known<br />
as discharge areas.<br />
Groundwater moves from areas of high hydraulic<br />
head to areas of low hydraulic head. Hydraulic head<br />
comprises of two parameters – elevation and pressure.<br />
At the water table pressure is zero, so elevation defines<br />
hydraulic head, and consequently groundwater moves<br />
from high to low elevation.<br />
So we understand that groundwater moves from<br />
recharge to discharge areas, or from high head to low<br />
head. But how does the water move through the rock<br />
The movement of groundwater through aquifers is due<br />
to either permeability or fractures. The permeability of<br />
a rock is simply how well the pore spaces, or porosity,<br />
are connected. If a rock has a high permeability then<br />
groundwater will flow. The movement of groundwater<br />
through the gaps between grains of a rock is termed<br />
intergranular flow and is the predominant flow<br />
mechanism for sands and sandstone.<br />
The second mechanism for groundwater movement<br />
is via fractures. The chalk of the UK has a high<br />
porosity of about 40%, but a low permeability, due to<br />
the fine-grained nature of the matrix resulting in pore<br />
throats of approximately 1µm. However, the chalk is<br />
heavily fractured and these fractures can allow rapid<br />
transport of groundwater. The fractures contribute to<br />
approximately 1% of total porosity, but almost all the<br />
groundwater yield.<br />
Figure 1:<br />
Groundwater residence time and discharge<br />
(IPR/35-35c British Geological Survey © NERC. All rights reserved.)<br />
Figure 2:<br />
Groundwater usage distribution in the UK<br />
(UK Groundwater Forum)<br />
UK Groundwater Resources<br />
In the UK 28% of our water supply is sourced from<br />
groundwater. However, this usage depends on geographical<br />
position (see Figure 2). In the south of<br />
England up to 72% of water supply is from groundwater,<br />
whereas in Scotland this is as low as 3%. This<br />
high usage, unsurprisingly, coincides with the main<br />
aquifers. The usage is also high in the south and east<br />
due to a high population density reducing the potential<br />
for reservoirs, and a lower rainfall than the northwest.<br />
Approximately 55% of groundwater is<br />
abstracted from the chalk (see Figure 2), and 26%<br />
from the Permo – Triassic sandstones. The remaining<br />
19% is sourced from Devonian sandstone, Carboniferous<br />
and Permian limestone and Cretaceous<br />
sandstone. The use of groundwater is likely to<br />
increase further as population and usage increases<br />
and therefore any contamination of the resource is of<br />
major concern for the supply of high quality drinking<br />
water.<br />
Pollution<br />
The majority of people have seen a polluted stream or<br />
lake. Surface waters are readily vulnerable to pollution<br />
and a contaminated river is visibly obvious. The awareness<br />
of the ease of polluting surface waters, and its high<br />
visibility and consequently priority to the general public,<br />
has resulted in actions to protect them, and for the<br />
water to be treated.<br />
69 www.esta-uk.org
TEACHING EARTH SCIENCES ● Volume 27 ● Number 3, 2002<br />
Figure 3:<br />
Potentially<br />
polluting activities<br />
(UK Groundwater<br />
Forum)<br />
Groundwater may not be pure, but it is less vulnerable<br />
to simple pollution as seen in rivers and lakes.<br />
However, this leads to a misconception that groundwater<br />
is invulnerable to pollution. Two factors, perhaps<br />
above all others, have led to a false sense of security over<br />
groundwater pollution. The first is the slow speeds of<br />
typical groundwater movement. From the time a molecule<br />
of water enters the ground as recharge to the time<br />
it leaves the aquifer is rarely less than years, and may be<br />
centuries or millennia (Price, 1996). The second factor<br />
is the enormous capacity of most aquifers to adsorb and<br />
dilute pollutants. This arises from the size and volumes<br />
of water held in storage and from the efforts of dispersion<br />
and adsorption as groundwater flows through the<br />
aquifer by advection. This delays the contaminant<br />
emergence from the ground and often dilutes sufficiently<br />
for no detection. The contamination can then<br />
continue until by the time it is discovered the total<br />
quantity of pollutant in and moving through the aquifer<br />
may be very large. Also the factor of “out of site out of<br />
mind” applies, where any contamination that is not visible<br />
is not seen as a major problem and results in a lower<br />
public awareness of such issues. A consequence of the<br />
groundwater being out of site is that any contamination<br />
is hard to detect and monitor, and the task of cleaning<br />
up a polluted aquifer is enormous.<br />
With increasingly stricter standards required for<br />
water quality and increasingly sensitive detection<br />
equipment the release of contaminants can lead to a situation<br />
where large volumes of groundwater are theoretically<br />
unfit for human consumption. It is therefore<br />
important to take a preventative rather than curative<br />
approach to groundwater pollution.<br />
There is a large range of human activities that can<br />
result in pollution of groundwater. (see Figure 3). The<br />
obvious examples are contamination due to hydrocarbons<br />
(NAPL’s) such as leaky storage tanks at petrol stations<br />
or oil and gas power stations or industrial storage<br />
sites. Another common source of contamination is<br />
from landfill and also septic tanks. All of the above<br />
examples are point source types of pollution. There is<br />
also diffuse source pollution, which can arise from<br />
large areas of land during farming operations. A third<br />
group of pollution arises from line sources, such as<br />
railway sidings or roads where excessive pollutants such<br />
as pesticides or salt are used.<br />
As people’s awareness of pollution improves, and<br />
regulations become stricter, many current practices are<br />
identified as having the potential to pollute the environment.<br />
One such practice is burial sites.<br />
Cemeteries<br />
There are many anecdotal references to cemeteries,<br />
such as a higher incidence of typhoid fever among people<br />
living near a cemetery in Berlin between 1863 and<br />
1867 (Bouwer, 1978) or a “sweetish taste and infected<br />
odour” of water from wells close to cemeteries in Paris,<br />
especially in hot summers (Bouwer, 1978). There has<br />
also been an historical prevalence of placing drinking<br />
wells in close proximity to cemeteries or graveyards. A<br />
quote from Holme (1896), states:<br />
“It is a fact that many wells, conduits and pumps in<br />
and around London were, and still are, in close proximity<br />
to churchyards, or even within them”<br />
“Another [pump] in St Georges [churchyard] was<br />
used for drinking water until the Revd Harry Jones,<br />
during a cholera scare, hung a large placard on it reading<br />
‘dead men’s broth!’”<br />
To understand the potential for pollution from<br />
cemeteries we have to understand the processes that<br />
generate the contaminants, however gruesome it may<br />
appear. There are 5 stages of human body decomposition<br />
recognised:<br />
1. Fresh<br />
2. Bloat<br />
3. Active decay<br />
4. Advanced decay<br />
5. Dry skeletal remains<br />
www.esta-uk.org<br />
70
TEACHING EARTH SCIENCES ● Volume 27 ● Number 3, 2002<br />
The decay process begins as early as half an hour after<br />
death, with muscular flaccidity, desiccation (dull eyeballs)<br />
and hypostasis (drainage of blood under gravity).<br />
A human corpse normally decays totally within a period<br />
of 10-12 years with over half of the contaminant<br />
loading leached within the first year of decomposition.<br />
This gives each human body an approximate contamination<br />
life span of 10 years, depending on prevailing<br />
conditions such as temperature, chemical conditions<br />
surrounding material.<br />
The degradation of a human body is analogous to a<br />
landfill filled with putrescible waste, with a couple of<br />
minor exceptions, and is principally controlled by<br />
microbial decay. The principle outputs for a landfill<br />
containing putrescible waste is summarised in Figure<br />
4. Decomposition begins when aerobic bacteria get to<br />
work. The action of these bacteria consumes the oxygen<br />
that was incorporated in the waste and produces<br />
carbon dioxide. This first stage of decomposition usually<br />
takes from a few weeks to a few months (Phase I).<br />
When the oxygen has been consumed, anaerobic bacteria<br />
take over and produce more carbon dioxide and<br />
fatty acids. Methane also begins to be produced. There<br />
is large-scale settlement in Stages I and II. In Stage III<br />
the fatty acids are themselves broken down to produce<br />
more methane. Stage IV is an equilibrium phase<br />
where the landfill or body acts as a natural bioreactor.<br />
The characteristic feature of this stage is the generation<br />
of relatively constant levels of methane and carbon<br />
dioxide. This only ends when the putrescible<br />
component source is exhausted (Stage V) and aerobic<br />
conditions return. At the same time there is gas produced,<br />
inorganic material contribute to the composition<br />
of leachate.<br />
The principal differences between a landfill and<br />
decomposition of a human body are that the ratio of<br />
Carbon to Nitrogen to Phosphorous (30:3:1) in a<br />
human body provides a good balance between the principal<br />
microbial nutrients. Landfills are generally deficient<br />
in Phosphorous. Also, more importantly, the rate<br />
of leachate production in a grave is far higher than in a<br />
landfill. Modern landfills are designed with low permeability<br />
clay caps to reduce the amount of precipitation<br />
infiltrating into the landfill, which helps to reduce the<br />
amount of leachate produced. Graves are not, and they<br />
actually act as preferential channels for infiltration as<br />
they are filled with disturbed material. Secondly a<br />
human body contains nearly double the amount of<br />
water found in an average landfill, also aiding to<br />
leachate production. Therefore, human bodies decompose<br />
more efficiently than putrescible waste in a landfill,<br />
with the process generating leachate containing the<br />
following main contaminants:<br />
● Organic compounds<br />
● Ammonical nitrogen and nitrate<br />
● Principle mobile anions (Chloride and Sulphate in<br />
particular)<br />
● Alkali earth metals (NA, K, Ca, Mg, Fe etc)<br />
● Pathogens (Staphylococcus aureus, Bacillus cereus,<br />
Clostridium perfrigens)<br />
● Viruses (Enteroviruses, Polioviruses, Echovirus,<br />
Hepatitis A, Reovirus and Rotavirus)<br />
Pollution Risk from Cemeteries<br />
We have seen that bodies decompose and produce a<br />
range of contaminants, but are these contaminants likely<br />
to become a source of pollution Modern landfills<br />
generally have a low risk of pollution because their pollution<br />
potential is well recognised and suitable measures<br />
are in place. As mentioned previously, modern<br />
landfills have low permeability clay caps to reduce infiltration<br />
(see Figure 5).<br />
Landfills also have a clay liner at the base that is engineered<br />
to a low permeability (10 -9 m/sec) and often a<br />
Figure 4:<br />
Organic and nonorganic<br />
products<br />
from a putrescible<br />
waste landfill<br />
Figure 5:<br />
Modern<br />
Landfill design<br />
(UK Groundwater<br />
Forum)<br />
71 www.esta-uk.org
TEACHING EARTH SCIENCES ● Volume 27 ● Number 3, 2002<br />
Figure 6:<br />
Mechanisms for<br />
dispersion in the<br />
saturated zone<br />
synthetic liner on top of even lower permeability. This<br />
acts to contain all leachates, which can then be removed<br />
if required. A down side to this is that it can hinder<br />
decomposition, but it does reduce risk of a pollution<br />
incident.<br />
This type of precaution is not seen at cemetery sites,<br />
yet there are over 200,000 burials per year (Young et al,<br />
2001), which equates to 12,000 tonnes of decomposing<br />
material (based on average body weight of 60kg). However,<br />
if burials were so contaminating then there would<br />
be widespread pollution as a result, and awareness<br />
would be high, as seen with landfills. This lack of<br />
awareness is either due to a lack of research in correlating<br />
pollution incidences with cemeteries or that the<br />
contaminants are attenuated. The attenuation of contaminants<br />
has much to do with the environment in<br />
which the burial occurs. As mentioned earlier a grave<br />
acts as a conduit for infiltration, due to the presence of<br />
disturbed infilled material. This infiltrated water then<br />
can dissolve and react with the products of degradation<br />
to produce the leachate. What happens next The<br />
movement of leachate from the grave “cell” is primarily<br />
determined by the surrounding strata and geology,<br />
with 3 principle components of pathways from the<br />
grave:<br />
● The soil surrounding the burial<br />
● The unsaturated zone of the underlying aquifer<br />
(if present)<br />
● The saturated zone of the aquifer (if present)<br />
The principle characteristics of each pathway are:<br />
1) Soil Pathways: Soils are often more complex in<br />
terms of composition, chemistry and biological<br />
activity than the underlying rocks or sediments from<br />
which they are derived. They may be the site of<br />
intense biochemical reactions, so that contaminants<br />
may undergo change as they pass through them. Air<br />
access to soils is generally good and likely to be aerobic,<br />
unless waterlogged, and this encourages oxidation<br />
of pollutants (i.e. Ammonia to nitrite and<br />
nitrate). The physical processes of filtration, adsorption,<br />
absorption and cation exchange are all important<br />
attenuating processes.<br />
2) Unsaturated zone pathways: These zones are generally<br />
less chemically and biologically active than the<br />
overlying soils. The rate of re-oxygenation from the<br />
surface is lower than in soils and anoxic conditions<br />
may develop. Nevertheless, chemical and biochemical<br />
reactions may continue to immobilise pollutants,<br />
whilst filtration, adsorption and cation exchange<br />
may continue to immobilise pollutants and some<br />
dissolved pollutants.<br />
3) Saturated zone pathway: Once in the saturated zone<br />
the contaminant begins to follow the regional<br />
groundwater movement (depending on relative densities<br />
of water and contaminant). The contaminant is<br />
transported with the groundwater by advection. The<br />
groundwater/contaminants are subject to dispersion<br />
(see Figure 6), and is the principle cause for dilution<br />
in the saturated zone. There are additional factors<br />
such as chemical and biological reactions, or filtration<br />
and diffusion.<br />
From this we can see how important the unsaturated<br />
and saturated zones are in attenuating the pollutants<br />
from a burial and that the potential for a cemetery to<br />
pollute is often largely dependent on the vulnerability<br />
of the soil, unsaturated zone and groundwater (see<br />
Figure 7). A thin sandy soil (little material for chemical<br />
reactions), a thin unsaturated zone and highly fractured,<br />
rapid transport aquifer would be highly<br />
vulnerable to pollution; whereas a thick clayey/organic<br />
rich soil, with thick unsaturated zone and deep<br />
water table offers good protection of groundwater<br />
from contamination.<br />
The potential risk from many of the contaminants is<br />
well documented, and their attenuation in aquifers is<br />
relatively well known. However, the study of bacteria<br />
and virus transport in aquifers is relatively new. Studies<br />
have shown several microbial contaminants in the<br />
groundwater associated with cemeteries. One of the<br />
most significant was Staphylococcus aureus, and is a bacteria<br />
commonly associated with human decomposition.<br />
Other potentially harmful bacteria resulting from<br />
human decay are Bacillus cereus and Clostridium perfrigens.<br />
There are also a series of potentially harmful viruses<br />
such as: Enteroviruses, Polioviruses, Echovirus,<br />
Hepatitis A, Reovirus and Rotavirus.<br />
Most enteric pathogens die within 2-3 months once<br />
outside the human gut, however, under cold conditions<br />
they could survive up to years. Enterovirus survival has<br />
been reported to range from 25 to 170 days. There is,<br />
however, a lack of research and consequently understanding,<br />
into firstly the potentially harmful microbes<br />
produced from decomposition, and secondly the<br />
www.esta-uk.org<br />
72
TEACHING EARTH SCIENCES ● Volume 27 ● Number 3, 2002<br />
mobility and survival of these microbes in groundwater.<br />
An understanding of these factors needs to be considered<br />
before an assessment of the potential risk from<br />
bacteria and viruses resulting from decomposition can<br />
be made.<br />
Conclusions<br />
An increased awareness of water – from a resource perspective<br />
and a pollution perspective – is critical for sustainable<br />
development. Water is continuously recycled as<br />
part of the water cycle, of which groundwater is just one<br />
part. The movement of water through the ground<br />
occurs by two mechanisms; firstly water moving<br />
between grains of material, termed intergranular flow,<br />
and secondly water moving along fractures, termed<br />
fracture flow. In the UK there is a large dependency on<br />
groundwater in southern England (72%), and a low<br />
dependency in Scotland (3%). This is primarily due to<br />
the location of the main water bearing units, or<br />
aquifers, in southern and central England, but also<br />
because of the high population density in southern<br />
England reducing space available for reservoirs.<br />
Groundwater can be polluted by a wide range of<br />
activities, either from a small aerial area, point source;<br />
from a large aerial area, diffuse source; or from a line<br />
source. An increasing understanding of pollution has<br />
helped identify many previously unthought-of potentially<br />
polluting activities, one of which is cemeteries. A<br />
human body decomposes in 10-12 years, depending on<br />
prevailing conditions. For this period the human body<br />
acts as a potential contaminant source, with ammonia,<br />
organic compounds, bacteria and viruses being some of<br />
the products. The surrounding soil, unsaturated zone<br />
and saturated zone control the movement of these contaminants<br />
with the lowering of contaminant concentrations,<br />
or attenuation, largely occurring in the soil zone<br />
due to complex composition and chemistry allowing<br />
biochemical reactions, chemical reactions, filtration,<br />
and adsorption. In the saturated zone, attenuation of<br />
contaminants is principally controlled by dispersion<br />
within the main groundwater flow. There are many<br />
unknowns in contamination arising from cemeteries,<br />
principally the presence and movement of bacteria and<br />
viruses, and therefore continued research is required to<br />
improve understanding and help towards the management<br />
of the “fundamental resource for sustaining life<br />
and for conserving the natural environment”.<br />
Mike Lelliott<br />
British Geological Survey<br />
Keyworth<br />
Nottingham<br />
NG12 5GG<br />
Tel. 0115 936 3206<br />
mlell@bgs.ac.uk<br />
Figure 7:<br />
Vulnerability of<br />
groundwater<br />
(UK Groundwater Forum)<br />
References<br />
Price, Mike (1996) Introducing Groundwater. 2nd edition. Stanley Thornes<br />
Ltd.<br />
Ward, R.C & Robinson, M. (2000). Principles of Hydrology. 4th Edition.<br />
McGraw-Hill.<br />
Young, C.P., Blackmore, K.M., Reynolds, P & Leavens, A. (2001).<br />
Pollution Potential of Cemeteries. R&D Project Record P2/024/1.<br />
Young, C.P., Blackmore, K.M., Reynolds, P & Leavens, A. (2001).<br />
Pollution Potential of Cemeteries. R&D Technical Report.<br />
Holmes, B. (1896). The London Burial Grounds. T Fisher Unwin<br />
Bouwer, H. (1978). Groundwater Hydrology. McGraw-Hill<br />
73 www.esta-uk.org
TEACHING EARTH SCIENCES ● Volume 27 ● Number 3, 2002<br />
Mass Extinctions:<br />
The Alternatives to “Deep Impact”<br />
ROSALIND V. WHITE<br />
This article is based on a presentation given to an INSET meeting for Post-16 Geology teachers at<br />
the ESTA Annual Course and Conference, Keyworth, September 2002.<br />
“<strong>Earth</strong>’s biggest mass extinction 251 million years ago was triggered by a collision with a comet<br />
or asteroid, US scientists say.” (BBC News website, 23 February 2001)<br />
“A huge outpouring of molten rock 250 million years ago may have been the decisive factor in the<br />
deaths of nearly all lifeforms on the <strong>Earth</strong> at that time.” (BBC News website, 6 June 2002)<br />
Figure 1.<br />
The five mass<br />
extinctions of the<br />
Phanerozoic (after<br />
Sepkoski, 1984).<br />
Confronted with openly conflicting headlines<br />
such as this, how should teachers react One of<br />
the main difficulties facing post-16 students is<br />
the realisation that science is an active process that,<br />
instead of giving “correct” answers, just yields a reasonable<br />
theory that fits the evidence we have at any particular<br />
time. This is especially true of topics on the AS/A2<br />
syllabus that are also the focus of active research at university<br />
level. Less-than-impartial media reporting of<br />
new advances can add to the confusion. This article<br />
gives an overview of the possible reasons for mass<br />
extinctions at the Permo-Triassic and Cretaceous-Tertiary<br />
boundaries, and outlines recent developments in<br />
research on the Permo-Triassic extinction.<br />
What is a mass extinction<br />
It is important that students understand the distinctions<br />
between death, extinction, and mass extinction. Death<br />
is an issue affecting individuals, with a 100% probability<br />
per organism. Extinction occurs for a particular<br />
species when the death rate exceeds the birth rate for a<br />
sufficiently long period. Extinctions happen all the<br />
time: the vast majority of species that have ever inhabited<br />
the <strong>Earth</strong> are now extinct. The rate at which species<br />
replace one another due to factors such as competition<br />
is known as “background extinction”.<br />
At some times in geological history, the extinction<br />
rate increases markedly above this background level,<br />
and this is known as a “mass extinction”, defined as the<br />
extinction of a significant proportion of the world’s<br />
biota in a geologically insignificant period of time. Of<br />
course, we can then argue about the meaning of the<br />
word ‘insignificant’, but for the purposes of this article,<br />
the term “mass extinction” is reserved specifically for<br />
the five most significant events of the last 500 million<br />
years (see Figure 1).<br />
Causes of mass extinctions: killing mechanisms<br />
Surprisingly, there are actually only a handful of ways to<br />
die: by direct physical trauma; via poisoning; through<br />
starvation; or by suffocation. It’s possible to reclassify<br />
all sorts of other deaths into these categories, e.g., death<br />
from old age could be as a result of being physically<br />
unable to collect or eat food (starvation) or inability to<br />
breathe (suffocation), and death from disease could<br />
potentially kill by any of the four mechanisms. However,<br />
to cause a mass extinction, we need to kill millions of<br />
individuals (or stop them reproducing), all within a relatively<br />
short period of time, so we need a mechanism<br />
that can cause direct physical trauma, poisoning, suffocation<br />
or starvation on a massive scale. Because of the<br />
apparent need for a catastrophic driving force, much of<br />
the recent research has focused on two scenarios: meteorite<br />
impact, or massive scale volcanism.<br />
The K-T impact<br />
In 1980, Alvarez proposed that a meteorite impact was<br />
responsible for the Cretaceous-Tertiary (K-T) mass<br />
extinction. This proposal was based primarily on the<br />
presence of elevated iridium concentrations (“iridium<br />
anomalies”) in rocks at the K-T boundary. Iridium is a<br />
siderophile (iron-loving) element that is very rare in<br />
crustal rocks, but is much more abundant in certain<br />
classes of meteorite. Over the subsequent two decades,<br />
more evidence for an impact was amassed, including<br />
www.esta-uk.org<br />
74
TEACHING EARTH SCIENCES ● Volume 27 ● Number 3, 2002<br />
tektites (once-molten droplets), shocked quartz,<br />
stishovite and microdiamonds (high pressure minerals),<br />
soot from wildfires, and exotic minerals (e.g.,<br />
spinels). This data-gathering culminated in the discovery<br />
of a ~180-km-diameter buried crater at Chicxulub,<br />
located on the Yucatan Peninsula of Mexico. A crater<br />
this large would have been caused by an impactor<br />
roughly 10 km in diameter, and the impact would have<br />
had devastating effects on life.<br />
Impact Winter<br />
What would have happened when the meteorite hit<br />
The scenario painted is gloomy. A fireball scorched<br />
everything in its path, and violent tsunami and widespread<br />
wildfires occurred. There would have been a<br />
lengthy period when sunlight was obscured by dust<br />
particles, reducing temperatures, hindering photosynthesis<br />
and resulting in breakdowns in the food chain.<br />
The meteorite landed on (and vaporised) gypsum and<br />
limestone, injecting sulphur dioxide and carbon dioxide<br />
into the atmosphere. The sulphur dioxide resulted<br />
in acid rain, and excess carbon dioxide contributed to<br />
greenhouse warming.<br />
At the present day, even though most geologists are<br />
convinced that there was a meteorite impact at the K-T<br />
boundary, and believe that its environmental effects<br />
would have been severe, discussion continues about<br />
what actually caused the K-T extinction. For example,<br />
on 31 August 2002, the BBC News website reported<br />
that “Cold was killing dinosaurs long before the asteroid<br />
commonly thought to have been their downfall hit,<br />
according to scientists.”<br />
Flood basalt volcanism<br />
The major thorn in the side of the impact theory is the<br />
fact that a meteorite impact was not the only catastrophic<br />
event to affect the <strong>Earth</strong> in Cretaceous-Tertiary<br />
times. In India, a vast “flood basalt” volcanic province<br />
called the Deccan Traps was being erupted. The current<br />
consensus amongst geologists is that flood basalts are<br />
the result of melt generation in mantle plumes: convective<br />
upwellings of anomalously hot material in the<br />
underlying mantle. Estimates of the original volume of<br />
the Deccan Traps are in the range of 1 to 2 million cubic<br />
kilometres, enough to cover the United Kingdom in a<br />
layer of lava 4-8 km thick! Individual eruptions may<br />
have lasted about a decade, with periods of quiescence<br />
lasting for centuries or millennia between eruptions.<br />
What was even more problematic for those advocating<br />
a meteorite impact as the sole cause of the K-T<br />
extinction was the observation that other mass extinctions<br />
also seemed to be temporally linked with the<br />
eruption of flood basalt provinces (see Figure 2). The<br />
biggest mass extinction of all, the Permo-Triassic (P-Tr)<br />
extinction, coincides exactly with the eruption of the<br />
Siberian Traps, and work published in 2002 shows that<br />
this province is twice as large as had previously been<br />
thought. Another example is the Triassic-Jurassic (Tr-J)<br />
extinction, which was contemporaneous with eruption<br />
of the Central Atlantic Magmatic Province, 200 million<br />
years ago.<br />
Volcanic Winter<br />
What would the <strong>Earth</strong> have been like during this massive<br />
scale volcanism Dust and ash were thrown up into<br />
the atmosphere, together with tiny aerosol droplets of<br />
sulphuric acid derived from volcanic sulphur dioxide<br />
gas. These particles obscured sunlight, possibly for<br />
months or years on end, reducing temperatures and<br />
hampering photosynthesis. The sulphuric aerosols ultimately<br />
fell back to the ground as acid rain. Lava set fire<br />
to vegetation, causing wildfires. Toxic fumes derived<br />
from fluorine and chlorine resulted in local poisoning.<br />
Carbon dioxide was injected into the atmosphere, contributing<br />
to greenhouse warming on longer timescales.<br />
And the worst of it is, just when things were recovering,<br />
there would be another eruption, and it would all happen<br />
again.<br />
Volcanism or impact<br />
As you can see, the effects of large volcanic eruptions<br />
and meteorite impacts are potentially fairly similar.<br />
This means that discussions of their environmental<br />
effects, while interesting, are not a particularly good<br />
way of deciding what actually caused the extinctions.<br />
We are called upon to make judgements about whether<br />
one serious event would be more serious than the<br />
cumulative effects of lots of smaller events.<br />
Unfortunately, because we are dealing with evidence<br />
that is millions of years old, there are many pieces of the<br />
jigsaw missing, and with the available data it’s impossible<br />
for either side to prove their case. This resulted in an<br />
uneasy stand-off, with volcano-theory supporters conceding<br />
that, in the case of the K-T, the “impactors” had<br />
a good case, but maintaining that the Deccan Traps<br />
must surely have had some significant effect. They also<br />
pointed out that the impact theory doesn’t seem very<br />
good at accounting for the other extinctions, which<br />
must, therefore, be volcanism-related. The impact-the-<br />
Figure 2.<br />
Timing of eruption<br />
of flood basalt<br />
provinces<br />
compared to the<br />
rate of extinctions.<br />
The three largest<br />
extinctions all<br />
correlate with<br />
flood basalt<br />
activity, but the<br />
lack of extinctions<br />
associated with<br />
other flood basalts<br />
demonstrates that<br />
flood basalts do<br />
not, on their own,<br />
necessarily cause<br />
mass extinctions.<br />
75 www.esta-uk.org
TEACHING EARTH SCIENCES ● Volume 27 ● Number 3, 2002<br />
ory supporters, meanwhile, were busily searching for<br />
evidence of impacts at other mass extinction horizons.<br />
Impact at the P-Tr and Tr-J boundaries<br />
In the mid-eighties, the first paper claiming to have<br />
found an iridium anomaly at the P-Tr boundary was<br />
published, but subsequent work found the anomalies<br />
to be insignificant, or non-existent. More recently, in<br />
February 2001, the British national newspapers proclaimed,<br />
“Comet killed life before dinosaurs”, and the<br />
debate about an impact at the end of the Permian<br />
recommenced. The articles arose from reports of<br />
fullerenes (carbon ‘buckyballs’) in P-Tr boundary sediments;<br />
the fullerenes contain trapped noble gases<br />
with isotopic ratios indicative of an extraterrestrial<br />
source. These results are highly controversial:<br />
attempts to replicate them have so far been unsuccessful,<br />
and the experimental details of the original work<br />
have also been questioned.<br />
For the Tr-J extinction, early searches for iridium<br />
If there really were large life-threatening impacts,<br />
even if the craters themselves have been subducted or<br />
destroyed by tectonism, the fallout would have been<br />
global, and I’m sure we’ll see a steady stream of<br />
supporting evidence published over the next few years<br />
anomalies were negative. However, a paper published<br />
in 2002 reports a small iridium anomaly, indicating that<br />
a small bolide impact occurred at this time.<br />
Likelihood of meteorite impacts<br />
My personal view is that I remain to be convinced that<br />
significant meteorite impacts occurred at these other two<br />
extinction horizons. That isn’t to say I don’t believe it –<br />
I am keeping an open mind! The key issue here (again)<br />
is the meaning of the word ‘significant’. If there really<br />
were large life-threatening impacts, even if the craters<br />
themselves have been subducted or destroyed by tectonism,<br />
the fallout would have been global, and I’m<br />
sure we’ll see a steady stream of supporting evidence<br />
published over the next few years. Then I’ll probably<br />
believe it. The reason for my scepticism is that smaller<br />
impacts happen fairly frequently, geologically speaking,<br />
and discovery of their products in the relevant time<br />
interval doesn’t prove anything about whether they<br />
were large enough to cause extinctions.<br />
Take, for example, the story of Manicouagan Crater<br />
in Canada. It is 100 km in diameter, and was once considered<br />
a very likely suspect for the Triassic-Jurassic<br />
extinction, at 200 Ma. However, when the crater was<br />
dated, it turned out that it was 14 million years older<br />
than the extinction, so could not have been the cause.<br />
And what’s more, there is no mass extinction at 214 Ma,<br />
so impacts causing craters as large as 100 km across<br />
don’t necessarily cause extinctions.<br />
We don’t know exactly how often impacts of different<br />
sizes occur. Geologists estimate impact frequencies by<br />
counting craters of different sizes on parts of the <strong>Earth</strong>’s<br />
surface unaffected by tectonism, and the results from<br />
this agree fairly well with astronomers’ estimates<br />
derived from counting bodies with <strong>Earth</strong>-crossing<br />
orbits. However, the errors are large – something like a<br />
factor of two. Nevertheless, as more craters and <strong>Earth</strong>crossing<br />
bodies are discovered, it seems that the original<br />
1980 estimate of a 100-million-year repeat time for<br />
a K-T-sized impact is an overestimate. Estimates of<br />
impact frequency published within the last five years<br />
yield a repeat time of only ~30 million years for a K-Tsized<br />
impactor, and 100-km craters would form even<br />
more frequently – every 10 million years or so.<br />
Do meteorite impacts cause flood basalt volcanism<br />
If claims for meteorite impacts at the P-Tr and Tr-J<br />
boundaries turn out to be true, and each of the three<br />
main extinctions correlate with both an impact and a<br />
flood basalt, does that mean that flood basalts are also a<br />
consequence of meteorite impacts After all, doesn’t it<br />
seem rather unlikely that impacts and flood basalts<br />
would coincide on three occasions if they were not<br />
linked in some way Although this idea has been aired<br />
in the media, it is only believed by a minority of geologists.<br />
Originally proposed for the K-T impact and the<br />
Deccan Traps, it does not adequately explain our observations:<br />
the discovery of the iridium-rich layer between<br />
lava flows of the Deccan Traps indicates that the lavas<br />
started erupting well before the meteorite hit. Moreover,<br />
the Deccan Traps were not at the impact site, and<br />
contrary to some claims, they weren’t directly opposite<br />
it either.<br />
In fact, because both impacts and flood basalts are<br />
more common than they are perceived to be, random<br />
chance is capable of explaining away a few coincidences<br />
between impacts and flood basalt volcanism. This<br />
analysis is dependent on the size of impact chosen:<br />
because smaller impacts are much more common, a<br />
few coincidences between flood basalts and, say, 100-<br />
km craters are entirely credible. If, however, evidence<br />
comes to light that several flood basalts correlate with<br />
200-km craters, I may have to reconsider my opinion!<br />
“Meteorites vs. volcanoes” oversimplifies the story<br />
Of course, in reality, it’s much more complicated than<br />
choosing between impacts and volcanoes. At the P-Tr<br />
boundary, for example, there’s evidence of other<br />
adverse environmental conditions. Discovery of pyrite<br />
in shallow water sediments demonstrates that the shallow<br />
oceans were oxygen-deficient (anoxic) – in which<br />
case, many organisms would have suffocated. This<br />
oceanic anoxia was probably a consequence of global<br />
warming, which reduced the pole-to-equator temperature<br />
gradient and made ocean circulation sluggish. This<br />
global warming may, in turn, have been caused by CO2<br />
release from the Siberian Traps, or from an impact site.<br />
www.esta-uk.org<br />
76
TEACHING EARTH SCIENCES ● Volume 27 ● Number 3, 2002<br />
Additionally, warmer ocean waters may have triggered<br />
the catastrophic release of methane hydrate from<br />
continental shelf sediments. Methane hydrate is a white<br />
crystalline substance consisting of CH4 molecules<br />
trapped in a structure of H2O ‘cages’. It is stable only<br />
when temperatures are low and pressures are high, and<br />
forms in sediments where decay of organic matter by<br />
anaerobic bacteria results in high methane concentrations.<br />
If released during an interval of global warming,<br />
it contributes strongly to the positive feedback loop:<br />
methane is a much more potent greenhouse gas than<br />
carbon dioxide. Evidence supporting an interval of<br />
methane hydrate release at the P-Tr boundary comes<br />
from changes in the carbon isotope composition of<br />
ocean water (see White, 2002 for further reading).<br />
Conclusions<br />
At least three of the major mass extinctions of the last<br />
600 million years appear to be temporally correlated<br />
with flood basalt volcanism, meteorite impact, or possibly<br />
both. However, we should not confuse ‘correlation’<br />
with ‘causation’. Correlation is easy to prove, but causation<br />
very difficult. Flood basalts and meteorite<br />
impacts are both much more common than mass<br />
extinctions, implying that neither type of event routinely,<br />
on its own, causes mass extinctions. Instead, it<br />
seems that mass extinctions only occur when <strong>Earth</strong> is<br />
attacked on more than one front, or when it is already<br />
in a vulnerable state.<br />
Catastrophic events such as meteorite impacts and<br />
massive volcanism provide an attractive means of<br />
explaining mass extinctions. We should be wary, however,<br />
about assuming that catastrophic outcomes necessarily<br />
require catastrophic stimuli. Because of positive<br />
feedback loops in the <strong>Earth</strong>’s biological and climatic<br />
systems, particularly those related to global warming,<br />
small perturbations in conditions may become amplified,<br />
and may potentially lead to catastrophic changes.<br />
This is important, because humans are currently contributing<br />
CO2 to the atmosphere at a rate that, in geological<br />
terms, is unprecedented. If we continue at this<br />
rate for a couple of thousand years, we will have exceeded<br />
the entire CO2 budget of the Siberian Traps. That’s<br />
quite a scary thought. Are we forcing the <strong>Earth</strong> into a<br />
vulnerable condition, such that a meteorite impact, if<br />
(or when) it occurs, will push us over the edge<br />
Catastrophic events such as meteorite impacts and<br />
massive volcanism provide an attractive means of<br />
explaining mass extinctions. We should be wary,<br />
however, about assuming that catastrophic outcomes<br />
necessarily require catastrophic stimuli.<br />
Further Reading<br />
Alvarez, L. W., Alvarez, W., Asaro, F. & Michel, H. V.<br />
(1980) Extraterrestrial cause for the Cretaceous<br />
Tertiary extinction. <strong>Science</strong> 208, 1095-1108.<br />
Becker, L., Poreda, R. J., Hunt, A. G., Bunch, T. E. &<br />
Rampino, M. (2001) Impact event at the Permian-<br />
Triassic boundary: Evidence from extraterrestrial<br />
noble gases in fullerenes. <strong>Science</strong> 291, 1530-1533.<br />
Hallam, A. & Wignall, P. B. (1997) Mass extinctions and<br />
their aftermath. Oxford University Press.<br />
Reichow, M., Saunders, A. D., White, R. V., Pringle,<br />
M. A., Al’Mukhamedov, A., Medvedev, A. & Kirda,<br />
N. P. (2002). 40 Ar/ 39 Ar dates from the West Siberian<br />
Basin: Siberian Flood Basalt Province doubled.<br />
<strong>Science</strong> 296, 1846-1849.<br />
Sepkoski, J. J., Jr. (1984) A kinetic model of<br />
Phanerozoic taxonomic diversity. III. Post-Paleozoic<br />
families and mass extinctions. Paleobiology 10, 246-269.<br />
White, R.V. (2002) <strong>Earth</strong>’s biggest ‘whodunnit’:<br />
unravelling the clues in the case of the end-Permian<br />
mass extinction. Phil. Trans. Royal Soc. London A<br />
360, X-XX (in press). Copies available (pdf files) by e-<br />
mailing the author.<br />
A Powerpoint version of this presentation is<br />
available on request by e-mailing the author.<br />
Rosalind V. White<br />
Royal Society Dorothy Hodgkin Research Fellow<br />
Department of Geology<br />
University of Leicester<br />
University Road<br />
Leicester<br />
LE1 7RH<br />
e-mail: rvw1@le.ac.uk<br />
Telephone: 0116 252 3315<br />
Fax: 0116 252 3918<br />
77 www.esta-uk.org
TEACHING EARTH SCIENCES ● Volume 27 ● Number 3, 2002<br />
Fossils Under the Microscope<br />
IAN WILKINSON<br />
Micropalaeontology is a subject that is not as widely taught as macropalaeontology - everybody<br />
has heard of trilobites, brachiopods and corals, but how many know of the existence of acritarchs,<br />
coccoliths or ostracods Although many organisms really are microscopic (a few microns in<br />
length), I will stretch the term to include fossils up to about 1500 microns across. It is an<br />
impossible task to describe all types of microfossils in the <strong>Earth</strong>’s rocks, but I give a taster of<br />
some of the more common. Microfossils from five kingdoms (see Figure 1) are studied and<br />
applied in finding solutions to geological problems in stratigraphy and palaeoecology. Although<br />
microscopic, it is not beyond the scope of schools to find at least some of these fossils.<br />
Figure 1.<br />
The relationship<br />
of common<br />
microfossils to<br />
kingdoms and cell<br />
type. (Note that<br />
some authors<br />
prefer to use the<br />
term Protoctista<br />
rather than<br />
Protista as the<br />
latter has been<br />
used primarily for<br />
single celled<br />
organisms.)<br />
Plants<br />
Spores<br />
Pollen<br />
Eukaryotes<br />
Prokaryotes<br />
Finding microfossils<br />
Microfossils can easily be extracted from marine,<br />
Mesozoic, Tertiary and Quaternary mudstones, siltstones<br />
and finer sandstones, particularly softer ones<br />
such as the Oxford Clay, Kimmeridge Clay, Gault and<br />
Speeton Clay. Softer chalk can also be disaggregated to<br />
liberate microfossils. However, a little care will be<br />
required as chemicals are involved. Soak the sediment<br />
in (flammable!) white spirit for half an hour then drain<br />
it off through filter paper to be used again. Wash the<br />
sample through a 75 micron (or smaller) sieve; add to<br />
warm water with washing soda and bring the water to<br />
the boil (care required!). Allow it to cool before washing<br />
it again through the sieve. When dry, the residue can<br />
Fungae<br />
Spores<br />
Fruiting Bodies<br />
Protista<br />
Acritarchs<br />
Dinoflagellates<br />
Coccolithophores<br />
Radiolaria<br />
Diatoms<br />
Foraminifera<br />
Algae<br />
Monera<br />
Bacteria<br />
Animals<br />
Conodonts<br />
Ostracods<br />
Chitinozoa<br />
be viewed best through a binocular microscope. Cross<br />
contamination of samples is a danger with microfossils<br />
and all equipment must be thoroughly cleaned after<br />
each sample. Ostracods, foraminifera, radiolaria and so<br />
on will be found with low-powered binocular microscopes<br />
at X10 or X20 magnifications. Other microfossils<br />
are probably beyond the scope of the equipment<br />
found in many schools as more specialised preparation,<br />
including acids, is needed and then high magnification<br />
microscopes are required.<br />
Those schools some distance from suitable rocks<br />
might try modern pond, lake, estuarine or coastal sediments,<br />
where similar organisms can be found. Modern<br />
sediments are the easier to deal with. Soak them in<br />
warm water with teepol or washing soda, before washing<br />
them on a 75 micron sieve to remove all the fine<br />
muds. Allow to dry. Examine the washed sediment<br />
through a binocular microscope at X10 or X20 magnification<br />
to see foraminifera and ostracods, in marine<br />
and estuarine sediments, or ostracods, diatoms and<br />
charophytes in lake and pond sediments.<br />
At the end of this article I give 14 separate summary<br />
boxes to show the range of microfossils across all five<br />
kingdoms.<br />
Kingdom Monera<br />
The history of life begins with the evolution of Kingdom<br />
Monera, and stretches back almost to earliest of<br />
<strong>Earth</strong>’s preserved rocks. Kingdom Monera is based on<br />
the prokaryote cell. These lack membrane bounded<br />
organelles (such as mitochondria and chloroplasts) and<br />
a nucleus with chromosomes. Some may have a simple<br />
flagella composed of the protein flagelin.<br />
There is often debate whether putative microfossils<br />
are actually mineral growths (remember the Martian<br />
‘microfossils’). The oldest undoubted fossil bacteria is<br />
from the 3,465 million year old Apex Chert from Australia,<br />
but there is some dispute whether older ‘microfossils’<br />
are truly biotic. Bacteria must have passed<br />
through a phase of non-biological evolution before<br />
evolving into chemautotrophs and later into the more<br />
advanced photosynthesising organisms. The fact that<br />
www.esta-uk.org<br />
78
TEACHING EARTH SCIENCES ● Volume 27 ● Number 3, 2002<br />
Banded Ironstones began to develop about 3,500Ma<br />
indicates when photosynthesis had evolved.<br />
Blue-green cyanobacteria (formerly known as bluegreen<br />
algae) began to evolve a little later and by<br />
3,000Ma were removing CaCO3 from seawater during<br />
photosynthesis. Stromatolites, thin calcareous mats laid<br />
down one on top of the other by blue green cyanobacteria<br />
form domes, sometimes several metres in height<br />
and 3,000 million years later living representatives are<br />
doing exactly the same thing at Shark Bay in Australia!<br />
The evolution from Prokaryotes to eukaryotes was<br />
probably the most significant step in the evolution of<br />
life. All living organisms (with the exception of Monera)<br />
are based on the eukaryotic cell structure. Eukaryotes<br />
are aerobic and so could only have evolved after<br />
oxygen had built up in the atmosphere. They had a larger<br />
cell than the prokaryotes, with a membrane-bounded<br />
nucleus containing chromosomes of DNA and<br />
RNA and proteins. The eukaryotic cell also contained<br />
membrane-bounded organelles (such as mitochondria).<br />
The composition of the flagella (undulipodia) is<br />
complex, being composed of tubulin and other proteins.<br />
It has been suggested that the eukaryote cell<br />
evolved by the symbiotic relationship of a number of<br />
different prokaryotic cells. So Kingdom Protista had<br />
evolved.<br />
Kingdom Protista<br />
Exactly when eukaryotes evolved is questionable.<br />
There is good fossil evidence of their existence 900-<br />
1,000 million years ago and there is strong evidence that<br />
they were probably around 1,500 million years ago.<br />
However, recent geochemical study on 2,700 million<br />
year old shales has found eukaryote lipids, which if correct,<br />
pushes the origin of the eukaryotes even further<br />
back in time.<br />
The Kingdom Protista is difficult to define and it is<br />
easiest to say what it is not, rather than what it is. They<br />
are not animals because they do not develop from blastula<br />
(a hollow sphere of cells formed from the cleavage<br />
of an ovum). They are not plants as they do not develop<br />
from an embryo (e.g. within a seed). They are not<br />
fungi as they have undulipodia (flagella for locomotion)<br />
and do not develop from spores. They are not Monera<br />
as they have a eukaryote cell structure. In other words,<br />
they have none of the characteristics of more advanced<br />
eukaryotic kingdoms.<br />
Kingdom Protista is perhaps the single most useful<br />
kingdom in the micropalaeontologist’s armoury. Of<br />
course, in the palaeontological record, only protistids<br />
that secreted a skeleton or went through an encysting<br />
stage were normally fossilised. There were a number of<br />
encysting organisms, including acritarchs and dinoflagellates,<br />
but other protists secreted a calcareous skeleton<br />
(such as various forms of algae, including<br />
coccoliths, and foraminifera) or a siliceous skeleton<br />
(such as radiolaria and diatoms).<br />
Protista are important tools in the more applied side<br />
of palaeontology (biostratigraphy and palaeoenvironmental<br />
reconstruction). Dinoflagellate cysts are particularly<br />
useful in dating organic-rich rocks, in which they<br />
are found in abundance, and they have been particularly<br />
useful in hydrocarbons exploration. Coccoliths are<br />
also useful for biostratigraphical studies, particularly<br />
through the Mesozoic and into the Tertiary, while<br />
acritarchs and foraminifera can be used throughout the<br />
Palaeozoic and through to the Quaternary. The history<br />
of Radiolaria extends back into the Palaeozoic, but they<br />
are useful as biostratigraphical markers particularly in<br />
the Late Jurassic and in the Tertiary.<br />
Diatoms are useful in several respects. In some cases<br />
huge numbers of diatoms were deposited to form a sedimentary<br />
rock called a diatomite (with industrial applications<br />
in, for example, sugar refining, toothpaste<br />
manufacturing, as a mild abrasive and in paint production).<br />
However, their scientific application is in environmental<br />
reconstruction. Fresh water diatoms can be<br />
useful in monitoring the acidification of lakes as certain<br />
species are affected by pH. By logging the species present<br />
in sediments of different ages, it is possible to see<br />
the effects of industrial pollution.<br />
Algae are frequently single celled, but there are many<br />
instances where they are multicelled (seaweeds, for<br />
example). The single celled algae are generally considered<br />
to be protista, but the multicelled algae are sometimes<br />
considered to be members of the plant kingdom.<br />
Undoubtedly the earliest plants evolved from multicelled<br />
algae, probably the ‘green algae’, the chlorophytes,<br />
but the definition of the plant kingdom, must<br />
preclude them.<br />
Kingdom Plantae<br />
The plant kingdom comprises multi-celled, sexually<br />
reproducing eukaryotes that develop from an embryo<br />
(e.g. within a seed). The cell contains photosynthetic<br />
organelles called chloroplasts that contain chlorophyll,<br />
and its walls are composed of cellulose and pectins.<br />
With the appearance of the plant kingdom from their<br />
algal forebears, so spores and pollen became common<br />
microfossils. The earliest spores are Mid Ordovician in<br />
age (465-470 million years old) and probably produced<br />
by bryophytes. The earliest fossilised plants are vascular<br />
types (e.g. Cooksonia), which evolved in the Late Silurian.<br />
They rapidly diversified so that by the Carboniferous<br />
the first tropical rain forests had developed.<br />
One of the difficulties that need to be faced in<br />
palaeontology is where different parts of a single organism<br />
are given different names. This is seen in palaeobotany<br />
where the stem, leaf, root and pollen or spores of<br />
a single plant are given different names. Although the<br />
stems and leaves of plants do not fall within the definition<br />
of microfossils, the spores and pollen do.<br />
Spores and pollen are important microfossils for dating<br />
and correlating terrestrial, lacustrine and marginal<br />
marine sediments and for providing palaeoenvironmental<br />
information. An example of how pollen can be<br />
79 www.esta-uk.org
TEACHING EARTH SCIENCES ● Volume 27 ● Number 3, 2002<br />
used in palaeoenvironmental reconstruction comes<br />
from Eemian (Pleistocene) lake sediments of southern<br />
England. Pollen from sediment cores show that with<br />
the retreat of the ice, cold birch forests with abundant<br />
small herbs and shrubs were established. With continued<br />
amelioration pine colonised southern England and<br />
then as the climatic optimum approached, elm, oak,<br />
alder and hazel pollen began to appear in the sediments.<br />
Climatic deterioration then set in re-establishing first<br />
the pine forests and then the birch.<br />
Kingdom Fungi<br />
This kingdom contains eukaryotic organisms that<br />
reproduce by spores. Reproductive structures may be<br />
microscopic or macroscopic (mushrooms for example).<br />
Reproduction is mainly sexual, the hyphae fusing<br />
together, but a few produce only asexual spores.<br />
Whichever stratagem is used, the hyphal nuclei are haploid.<br />
However, they lack flagella in all phases of their<br />
life cycle. Fungi are aerobes and heterotrophs. They do<br />
not ingest food, but excrete enzymes that break down<br />
the food into molecules outside the organism, before<br />
absorbing it.<br />
Fossil spores and fruiting bodies of fungus have been<br />
found in rocks as old as the Devonian, although they are<br />
not widely studied and do not form an important element<br />
in the biostratigrapher’s armoury. I mention them<br />
here for completeness.<br />
Kingdom Animalia<br />
The animal kingdom comprises multicelled, eukaryotic<br />
organisms. They are heterotrophic (obtaining energy<br />
from organic compounds), diploid (cells with a nucleus<br />
containing two sets of chromosomes) and anisogamous<br />
(gametes of different morphology, ova and<br />
sperm). The diploid zygote develops by mitosis and<br />
forms an embryo resembling a hollow ball of cells<br />
(blastula) before progressing to the foetus. There are<br />
several microscopic members of the animal kingdom<br />
that are found as microfossils.<br />
Ostracods, for example, are small bivalved crustacea.<br />
The origin of ostracods is obscure because the soft bodies<br />
of some Cambrian ‘ostracods’ have occasionally<br />
been preserved intact, and prove that they are neither<br />
ostracods (as discussed by Mark Williams elsewhere in<br />
this volume p.89) nor, in some cases, crustacea. They<br />
have applications in biostratigraphy, but as different<br />
species live in a wide variety of environments, they are<br />
also useful in palaeoenvironmental reconstruction and<br />
modeling. Ostracods (together with Foraminifera) have<br />
been particularly useful in studying climate change.<br />
Different taxa have differing requirements and this can<br />
be used to model palaeoclimates. In addition, all species<br />
take up oxygen when forming their carapace during life<br />
and an oxygen isotope ‘finger print’ is left that can be<br />
used in palaeoenvironmental studies.<br />
In the Palaeozoic, it is not unusual to find organisms<br />
of uncertain affinity. Chitinozoa, for example, are<br />
extinct flask-shaped organisms that are said by some<br />
palaeontologists to have been related to foraminifera,<br />
others have suggested they are egg cases, and yet others<br />
considered to be related to an unknown animal. In fact<br />
nobody is certain what they are related to and they are<br />
often placed into ‘incertae sedis’.<br />
Another animal that has caused a great deal of scientific<br />
debate regarding its relationships is the conodont.<br />
These are found as small teeth-like structures in<br />
Palaeozoic rocks. Although first described as long ago as<br />
1856, it was not until 1983 that palaeontologists knew<br />
what the conodont animal looked like. These small<br />
teeth came from the mouth of an eel-like animal, possibly<br />
a distant relation of the hag fish. However, one of<br />
the fundamental problems in palaeontology is illustrated<br />
here. Different species and genera of conodont have<br />
been erected on the basis of the different morphologies<br />
of their tooth-like structures. Only when the whole<br />
animal was found did palaeontologists realise that different<br />
genera and species of conodont were found<br />
together in a single creature. A taxonomic can of worms<br />
was opened-what should the animal be called What<br />
genus should it be put in<br />
Conclusion<br />
Microscopic life began with the prokaryotic cell when<br />
monera evolved early in the <strong>Earth</strong>’s history. From these<br />
the eukaryotic cell evolved and with it the protista, a<br />
kingdom that experimented with multicellular body<br />
plans. Some protista show a relationship with plants<br />
(e.g. algae and dinoflagellates) and others with animals<br />
(e.g. foraminifera). It was from protista that the three<br />
other eukaryotic kingdoms evolved, plants, animals and<br />
fungi, all with microscopic representatives preserved as<br />
fossils (see Figure 1). A brief description of some of the<br />
more common types of microfossils are appended in a<br />
series of boxes.<br />
Microfossils are not only important from a taxonomic<br />
and evolutionary context, but they have important<br />
stratigraphical applications for mapping, surveying<br />
and coal or hydrocarbons exploration, where an understanding<br />
of correlation, tectonics, geometry and relationships<br />
of rock units is required. Some groups of<br />
microscopic taxa evolve rapidly, live for a short time<br />
before becoming extinct. Biostratigraphical dating of<br />
the geological record and the recognition of zones and<br />
subzones provides the geologist with a tight temporal<br />
control and a tool for correlating widely separated exposures<br />
and boreholes. Different species have a variety of<br />
environmental requirements so that microfossils are<br />
also useful in the study of palaeoenvironments and<br />
modeling aspects such as sea level change, climate<br />
change and conditions during sediment accumulation.<br />
www.esta-uk.org<br />
80
TEACHING EARTH SCIENCES ● Volume 27 ● Number 3, 2002<br />
Suggested Reading<br />
Although the literature is full of detailed scientific<br />
description, discussion and geological applications of<br />
microfossils, there are few books outlining microfossils<br />
in a general way. Those that have been written are<br />
becoming a little elderly and may be difficult to obtain<br />
outside a library, although a revision of Brasier’s book is<br />
in progress.<br />
Bignot, G. (1985) Elements of Micropalaeontology. 217pp.<br />
London: Graham & Trotman.<br />
Brasier, M.D. (1980) Microfossils. 193pp London:<br />
George Allen & Unwin.<br />
Haq, B.U. & Boersma, A.(1978) Introduction to Marine<br />
Micropaleontology. 376pp. New York: Elsevier.<br />
The following can be purchased through the BGS or any good bookshop.<br />
Wilkinson, I.P. (1996) Fossil Focus: Ostracoda. Nottingham: BGS.<br />
Wilkinson, I.P. (1997) Fossil Focus: Foraminifera. Nottingham: BGS.<br />
Acknowledgements<br />
I thank the following for assistance in illustrating this paper. Bacteria and<br />
blue-green bacteria were drawn by Chris Wardle. Photographs were taken<br />
by Mike Stephenson (pollen & spore), Jim Riding (dinoflagellate), Stewart<br />
Molyneux (chitinozoan and acritarch), Nick Riley (calcareous algae) and<br />
Mark Dean (conodont). Former members of staff of the BGS captured the<br />
images of the radiolarian and diatom (Murray Hughes) and coccoliths<br />
(Alan Medd). This paper is published with permission of the Director of<br />
the British Geological Survey (N.E.R.C.)<br />
Ian Wilkinson<br />
British Geological Survey<br />
Keyworth, Nottingham NG12 5GG<br />
Summary Charts<br />
Ostracoda<br />
Kingdom: Animal<br />
Chitinozoa<br />
Kingdom: Animal()<br />
Geological range:<br />
(Cambrian) Ordovician<br />
to Recent<br />
Geological range:<br />
Ordovician-Devonian<br />
Late Jurassic ostracod<br />
Ostracods are small crustacea that secrete a bi-valved,<br />
calcareous carapace. The hinge line along the dorsal margin<br />
may be a simple bar and groove or a series of teeth and<br />
sockets. The animal opens and closes the carapace with<br />
adductor muscles, the scars often being seen inside each<br />
valve. The surface of the carapace may be smooth or<br />
ornamented with punctation, reticulation, ribs and spines.<br />
Most ostracods are less than 1500 microns, although the<br />
largest is about 2.5 centimetres long. Ostracods are found in<br />
all aquatic environments from the deep sea to coastal rock<br />
pools, estuaries, ponds and lakes. They have even been<br />
found in trees of tropical rain forests where a small pools form<br />
in the leaves. Although they are not usually regarded as<br />
terrestrial animals, one genus has been found amongst leaf<br />
litter on wet, marshy ground. Fossil ostracods are particularly<br />
useful when making palaeoenvironmental reconstructions.<br />
I.P.Wilkinson (BGS)<br />
An Ordovician chitinozoan<br />
Chitinozoa are flask- or bottle-shaped organisms with a<br />
vesicle and an aperture at the end of a neck. They are<br />
sometimes found attached in chains. They may be smooth,<br />
hispid, tuberculate or spiny. They are usually 150-300<br />
microns long, but may be as small as 30 microns or as large<br />
as 1500 microns. The walls are made of chitin-like material<br />
and generally brown or black in colour. These extinct<br />
organisms are found in marine Palaeozoic rocks (especially<br />
shales and siltstones) and mainly those that accumulated in<br />
shallow, well oxygenated conditions. It is not unusual to<br />
find organisms of uncertain affinity in Palaeozoic deposits.<br />
The Chitinozoa is an example of this. Some palaeontologists<br />
believe that they were planktonic and probably zooplankton;<br />
others have suggested that they were related to<br />
foraminifera, and yet others consider them to be egg cases<br />
of an unknown animal.<br />
I.P.Wilkinson (BGS)<br />
81 www.esta-uk.org
TEACHING EARTH SCIENCES ● Volume 27 ● Number 3, 2002<br />
Bacteria<br />
Kingdom: Monera<br />
Blue green cyanobacteria<br />
Kingdom: Monera<br />
Geological range:<br />
Archaean to Recent<br />
Geological range:<br />
Archaean to Recent<br />
Precambrian bacteria<br />
Kingdom Monera is based on the prokaryote cell (they lack<br />
organelles, like mitochondria, and a nucleus with<br />
chromosomes). The most primitive would have been<br />
chemoautotrophs, adapted to the reducing conditions, but<br />
photautotrophs soon evolved. Some of the oldest known<br />
fossils were single cells less than 1 micron long, but others<br />
formed chains of cells (filaments), like those from the Apex<br />
Chert (3465Ma), or star-like arrangements e.g. Eoastrion<br />
from the Gun Flint Chert (2000 Ma). Bacillus-like<br />
Eobacterium are found in the Fig Tree Chert (3000Ma). These<br />
organisms formed Banded Ironstone Formations (BIFs).<br />
Oxygen given off by the bacteria caused ferrous iron in ocean<br />
water to oxidise and precipitated as a red layer of iron onto<br />
the sea floor. At times when oxygen was not being created,<br />
grey cherts were precipitated instead. These layers built up<br />
alternately to form BIFs.<br />
I.P.Wilkinson (BGS)<br />
Precambrian blue-green cyanobacteria<br />
Blue green cyanobacteria are found as fossils in<br />
Precambrian cherts, the oldest being from the 3400Ma old<br />
Towers Formation (Australia). Other examples come from the<br />
Fig Tree Chert and the Gun Flint Chert. These single-celled<br />
organisms may occur as single cells or form a chain of cells<br />
called a filament. Cells may be spheroidal, cylindrical or<br />
irregular. They photosynthesised, giving off oxygen as a<br />
waste product. In some places, vast numbers of blue green<br />
cyanobacteria formed a mat on the sea bed and by 3000Ma<br />
they were removing CaCO3 from the sea water during<br />
photosynthesis. Precipitation of these carbonates produced<br />
the first limestones. Mat upon mat were built up to form<br />
domes and mounds of limestone called stromatolites. 3000<br />
million years later they are still doing the same thing in<br />
Shark Bay, Australia.<br />
I.P.Wilkinson (BGS)<br />
Acritarchs<br />
Kingdom: Protista<br />
Dinoflagellates<br />
Kingdom: Protista<br />
Geological range:<br />
Precambrian to Pleistocene<br />
Geological range:<br />
Silurian, Late<br />
Triassic to Recent<br />
Early Ordovician acritarch<br />
Acritarchs are amongst the earliest protists. The oldest<br />
fossils are simple spherical cysts that first appear in shales<br />
1900-1600 million years old. Acritarchs are diverse and most<br />
abundant in rocks of Cambrian to Devonian age (c. 550 to 350<br />
million years ago). The cyst, which is up to about 150<br />
microns across, has a resistant wall that may be preserved as<br />
a fossil. Their exact affinities are unknown, but it is likely that<br />
many were marine phytoplankton, similar to dinoflagellates<br />
and some Prasinophyceae. If so, the organisms responsible<br />
for producing the cysts probably had a motile planktonic<br />
stage that encysted as a result of environmental stress or as<br />
part of their reproductive life cycle. Nothing is known of the<br />
motile stage, probably because it was composed of an organic<br />
compound like cellulose, which is less easily preserved.<br />
Jurassic dinoflagellate<br />
Dinoflagellates are single celled protistids. They are plantlike<br />
in having cellulose in the walls and chlorophyll pigments<br />
in the protoplasm, but animal-like having a motile phase with<br />
whip-like flagella to provide propulsion through ocean<br />
waters. The hard envelope (theca) comprises a number of<br />
plates and contains the large nucleus and chromoplasts. Like<br />
acritarchs, during periods of adverse environmental<br />
conditions or after reproduction, they have a ‘resting stage’<br />
when they encyst. But, unlike acritarchs, the plates of the<br />
theca are retained in the cyst stage. Cysts, the only part that<br />
is fossilized, are 20-150 microns across, and may be smooth<br />
or ornamented with spines, ridges and granules. When<br />
improved conditions returned, the dinoflagellate escapes<br />
their cyst through a hole (archaeopyle) in the wall, made by<br />
discarding one of the plates.<br />
I.P.Wilkinson (BGS)<br />
I.P.Wilkinson (BGS)<br />
www.esta-uk.org<br />
82
TEACHING EARTH SCIENCES ● Volume 27 ● Number 3, 2002<br />
Coccolithophores<br />
Geological range:<br />
(Precambrian)<br />
Late Triassic to Recent<br />
Kingdom: Protista<br />
Foraminifera<br />
Geological range:<br />
Cambrian to Recent<br />
Kingdom: Protista<br />
Jurassic coccoliths<br />
Coccolithophores are chrysophytes, unicellular and<br />
planktonic, with two flagella for locomotion. Of the c. 2000<br />
species, all but four live in normal marine salinities (three live<br />
in fresh waters and one in high salinities of the Dead Sea).<br />
They require well oxygenated waters and live within the top<br />
50m of the water column in order to photosynthesise.<br />
Between 10 and 30 tiny (3 to 15 microns) calcareous plates<br />
(coccoliths) envelope the organism in a cyst-like coccosphere.<br />
On death, the coccosphere breaks up into coccoliths and, with<br />
diagenesis, these often break up into component crystals.<br />
Coccoliths and their debris comprise over 90% of the<br />
Cretaceous chalk of Britain. Coccolithophores are important<br />
in our environment today as they remove carbon dioxide, a<br />
greenhouse gas, by trapping it in their calcareous (CaCO3)<br />
skeletons on the ocean floor. They are sometimes so<br />
abundant that they form a coccolith ooze.<br />
I.P.Wilkinson (BGS)<br />
Late Jurassic Foraminifer<br />
Foraminifera are sometimes called ‘armoured amoeba’. The<br />
amoeba-like cell engulfs a tiny shell (test) that may be<br />
composed of calcite, aragonite or sand or silt grains cemented<br />
together by a calcite or silica cement. The test may be a<br />
single globular or tubular chamber; a string of chambers; a<br />
coiled arrangement of chambers or a mixture of these. They<br />
are often found fossilised. Most species are less than 1mm<br />
across, but the largest of these single celled organisms was<br />
over 10 cm in length. Foraminifera are confined to marine and<br />
brackish waters and extend into estuaries and marshes, but<br />
are not found in fresh water. Some are planktonic, while<br />
others are benthonic. They have a complex reproductive<br />
strategy so that alternating generations occur; an organism<br />
which was the result of sexual reproduction, will in turn<br />
reproduce asexually.<br />
I.P.Wilkinson (BGS)<br />
Radiolaria<br />
Kingdom: Protista<br />
Diatoms<br />
Kingdom: Protista<br />
Geological range:<br />
Cambrian to Recent<br />
Geological range:<br />
Jurassic,<br />
Cretaceous to Recent<br />
Eocene radiolarian<br />
Radiolaria are planktonic actinopods, heterotrophic protista<br />
that secrete a skeleton of between 100 and 2000 microns.<br />
The composition of the skeleton may be strontium sulphate or<br />
opaline silica. The latter, which dominate the fossil record,<br />
form two large groups. Spumularia, which evolved during the<br />
Ordovician, are radially symmetrical, often spherical or<br />
discoidal, with radial spines. Nassellaria, which developed at<br />
the beginning of the Mesozoic, are elongate and axially<br />
symmetrical, being elongate, ellipsoidal, discoidal or fusiform<br />
and often spinose. They live in tropical marine waters<br />
especially at depths of 100 to 500m. They remain buoyant in<br />
the water by using fat globules; gas-filled vacuoles; long rigid,<br />
thread-like axopods on spines; and by having perforated<br />
skeletons to reduce weight. Reproduction is asexual.<br />
Palaeogene diatom<br />
Diatoms are autotrophic, unicellular algae. They occur in the<br />
photic zone of oceans, estuaries, lakes and ponds. The part<br />
that is fossilised is the opaline silica shell (or frustule),<br />
which comprise two valves that fit together rather like a pillbox.<br />
The frustule may be up to about 2mm across and some<br />
forms are colonial, forming long chains. There are two large<br />
groups of fossil diatoms: the radially symmetrical Centrales,<br />
which evolved during the mid Cretaceous, and the more<br />
elongate, bilaterally symmetrical Pennales which appeared<br />
in the Eocene. They may occur in huge numbers on the<br />
ocean floor to form an ooze. In some cases when huge<br />
numbers of diatoms accumulated they formed a sedimentary<br />
rock called a diatomite. One Miocene diatomite in America is<br />
1000m thick and there are an estimated 6,000,000 frustules<br />
per cubic centimeter!<br />
I.P.Wilkinson (BGS)<br />
I.P.Wilkinson (BGS)<br />
83 www.esta-uk.org
TEACHING EARTH SCIENCES ● Volume 27 ● Number 3, 2002<br />
Green Algae<br />
(Chlorophyta)<br />
Geological range:<br />
Late Silurian to Recent<br />
Kingdom: Protista<br />
Pollen & Spores<br />
Geological range:<br />
Ordovician to Recent<br />
Kingdom: Plant<br />
Carboniferous calcareous algae<br />
Chlorophytes are ‘Green Algae’, with chlorophyll in their<br />
cells. Prasinophyceae have spherical cells, 100 to 700<br />
microns across, and an organic wall with small plate-like<br />
scales. Range: Cambrian to Recent. Chlorophycae have a<br />
large central vacuole surrounded by protoplasm. They may<br />
be unicellular or multicellular. Eosphaera is an example<br />
from the Precambrian. Some (Dasycladales and Siphonales)<br />
are spherical, cylindrical or branched and secrete a skeleton<br />
of aragonite, which becomes calcite during fossilisation.<br />
Charophycae are plant-like algae (‘stonewort’) that grow up<br />
to 2m high. Amongst the branches are small (500-750<br />
microns) male (antheridia) and female (oogonia) organs.<br />
The former is rarely fossilised, but the latter is an ovoid<br />
body, with a spiral ornament that may be found in lacustrine<br />
and estuarine deposits.<br />
I.P.Wilkinson (BGS)<br />
Pollen (top) & Spore (bottom) from the Permian<br />
Spores and pollen appeared when the plant kingdom evolved<br />
from its algal origin in the Ordovician. Spores from primitive<br />
plants (e.g. bryophytes, Cooksoni and Rhynia) were windblown<br />
and, if they landed in suitably moist soils, grew into a<br />
gametophyte plant, bearing both male and female cells. More<br />
advanced plants (e.g. clubmosses and horse tails), which<br />
evolved in the mid-Devonian, gave rise to microspores (20-50<br />
microns), that grew into male gametophytes, and megaspores<br />
(200-400 microns), that became female gametophytes.<br />
During the Late Palaeozoic, plants living in drier areas<br />
“imprisoned” the megaspore in a capsule where it developed<br />
further, eventually dividing into a few cells. The single celled<br />
microspores evolved into multicelled pollen grains (the male<br />
gametophyte), which fertilised the encapsulated female.<br />
Gymnosperms (e.g. seed-ferns, cycads and conifers) and<br />
flower-bearing angiosperms reproduced in this way.<br />
I.P.Wilkinson (BGS)<br />
Spores & Fruiting bodies<br />
Geological range:<br />
Devonian to Recent<br />
Kingdom: Fungi<br />
Conodontophorida<br />
Kingdom: Animal<br />
Geological range:<br />
Early Cambrian to late Triassic<br />
Fruiting body (left) & spore (right) of Palaeogene fungi<br />
Fungi are known to have evolved by the Devonian, although<br />
their early history is relatively poorly known. Spores and<br />
fruiting bodies have been found in the fossil record, but have<br />
been little studied. They have little known biostratigraphical<br />
or palaeoenvironmental value and have generally been<br />
ignored by palaeontologists.<br />
Platform (top) and compound (bottom) conodonts from the Carboniferous<br />
Conodonts are small teeth-like structures, generally 100 to<br />
2000 microns in length, but occasionally up to 5000 microns.<br />
They are made of calcium phosphate. Conodonts may be a<br />
simple, individual tooth, a compound ‘blade’ composed of a<br />
series teeth or a row of teeth attached to a ledge-like<br />
platform. They are found in Palaeozoic rocks, particularly<br />
limestones. Although first described as long ago as 1856, it<br />
was not until 1983 that palaeontologists new what the<br />
conodont animal looked like. These teeth came from the<br />
mouth of a eel-like fish, possibly a distant relation of the hag<br />
fish. But here was a problem. Different species and genera of<br />
conodonts had been erected for the different morphologies.<br />
Only when the whole animal was found did paleontologists<br />
realise that different genera and species were found together<br />
in the mouth of a single individual.<br />
I.P.Wilkinson (BGS)<br />
I.P.Wilkinson (BGS)<br />
www.esta-uk.org<br />
84
Winter 2002 ● Issue 39<br />
ENVIRONMENTAL<br />
IMPACTS – 3<br />
RIVERS<br />
Published by the <strong>Earth</strong> <strong>Science</strong> Teachers’ <strong>Association</strong> Registered Charity No. 1005331<br />
Introduction<br />
This is the third in a series of PEST’s concerning Environmental Impacts (1 and 2 were from space<br />
and from Volcanoes). This one concentrates on the environmental impact that rivers can have for a<br />
variety of reasons.<br />
Most of this relates to aspects of the Geography curriculum and covers knowledge and<br />
understanding of patterns and processes (Ga 4); Knowledge and understanding of<br />
environmental change and sustainable development (Ga5) and Breadth of Study – Themes (Ga<br />
6, c, d, e,). It can be linked into a variety of topic work particularly when studying any aspects of<br />
settlement and/or rivers.<br />
Many people do not realize the positive and often underlying environmental impact of a river such<br />
as the reasons for a settlement having been established where it is, but are more aware of the<br />
negative aspects such as flooding, pollution, disease, subsidence and drought.<br />
One point that is often forgotten is that flooding is natural and is the way a river copes with excess<br />
water. The flood plain is the flat area around a river channel that becomes flooded.<br />
This issue provides ideas of where and how to include the environmental impacts that rivers have<br />
from both a positive and a negative view.<br />
It includes information about the effects of rivers on its environment, how we make use of rivers<br />
and the effect this has, also the effect rivers have on our activities and how we live.
WINTER 2002 ● Issue 39 ● ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS - 3: RIVERS<br />
Accentuate the Positive !!!<br />
Settlements<br />
Settlements grew up beside rivers because: -<br />
There was easy access to water which is vital to human life<br />
There was fertile land<br />
There was water to grow crops<br />
There may have been a crossing point of the river<br />
There may have been access by water to other settlements<br />
There was easy access to water for industrial purposes<br />
The above ideas can be used when investigating a “place” in geography.<br />
All early settlements needed water to drink and thus were often near to a river or stream.<br />
The flood plains around rivers, also called alluvial plains, were also fertile land, which enabled<br />
settlers to grow crops, there was also water there to irrigate the crops.<br />
If the river had a shallow area where it could be crossed, the area was likely to attract travellers<br />
who might then also want to trade with the settlers.<br />
If the river was navigable then travellers might stop off to trade, or it would be easy for the settlers<br />
to visit other settlements to trade.<br />
If the river were suitable it could be used for industrial purposes, in earlier days this could have<br />
been a water mill, which could have provided flour for the settlement. In more recent times this<br />
light have been in the form of using the water for cooling purposes at a power station or even<br />
providing power in the form of Hydro electric power where the river flow was sufficient.<br />
Eliminate the Negative<br />
Flooding<br />
When a river floods it is because there is too much water being carried within the river channel.<br />
This may be due to excessive rainfall over a short period of time, or a sudden thaw of snow and ice<br />
or even a burst dam.<br />
Floodplains, narrow valleys and coastal areas are the most likely areas to be affected, with coastal<br />
areas (particularly low lying ones) more at risk than inland ones.<br />
As floodwater travels downstream it can become very dangerous depending on the amount of<br />
water involved, the debris it collects and the area it is flowing through.<br />
When a river bursts its banks in a rural area fields are flooded and often the only creatures at risk<br />
are animals. However crops can also be damaged by the floodwater, as can communications, with<br />
roads, railways and bridges being underwater and sometimes permanently damaged. Land can<br />
remain waterlogged for long periods of time in some cases with farmers’ livelihoods being put at<br />
risk. Where a flood is severe trees can be uprooted.
WINTER 2002 ● Issue 39 ● ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS - 3: RIVERS<br />
In urban areas there is often far more damage, towns can become flooded, houses and vehicles<br />
damaged and lives can be at risk. Where a flood is severe buildings and vehicles can be washed<br />
away and this debris cause even more damage.<br />
Where a potential hazard from flooding is known river defences are sometimes built to prevent<br />
floodwater reaching habited areas, but these do not always prevent flooding. Sometimes these<br />
defences cause as many problems as they solve, such as the levees built on the Mississippi in the<br />
USA. These are huge banks of earth on either side of the river, which were intended to contain the<br />
river when it flooded. These were however not enough to contain the summer floods in 1993,<br />
which followed an excessively wet summer.<br />
Dams are also used to regulate river flow on those rivers prone to flooding such as Clywedog Dam<br />
at Llandiloes on the River Severn. Flood defences in the UK are the responsibility of the<br />
Environmental Agency.<br />
Pollution<br />
Pollution after flooding can be as a result of floodwaters being polluted by sewage and other<br />
contaminated waste such as from industrial areas, plus fuel storage sites.<br />
However another form of pollution can be caused when industrial waste is released into a river by<br />
accident and causes pollution downstream, damaging wildlife and fish. Water is also taken from a<br />
river to be used for industrial purposes.<br />
Disease<br />
Due to pollution that occurs as above disease can sometimes cause more loss of life than the<br />
floods that preceded it. This is more often the case in underdeveloped areas where the water<br />
supplies may become polluted and cause diseases such as dysentery.<br />
Subsidence<br />
In certain types of areas, particularly those underlain by limestone, subsidence is the result of<br />
flooding. Landslides are also a hazard, and can be as dangerous as the flood water itself.<br />
Drought<br />
You may wonder why we have included this here, but drought can have just as dramatic effect on<br />
the environment, and can greatly affect river flow. In areas where there is a lock of rain a river<br />
becomes a vital source of water, however the drought itself can also cause the river volume to<br />
decrease and can affect crops and health.
WINTER 2002 ● Issue 39 ● ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS - 3: RIVERS<br />
Activities<br />
Making a Flood<br />
Build a river, using an old slide or plastic gutter and a mixture of sand and gravel (see instructions<br />
in PEST 16). Demonstrate normal flow then increase the volume of water flowing to show the<br />
difference that a large amount of water makes to a river. Ask children to predict which areas will be<br />
safe by placing plasticine blocks where they think houses will not be affected.<br />
Field Work.<br />
When studying rivers it is of course ideal to be able to visit a local on. Even a small stream can<br />
provide a good source for research. Ideally visit it at different times during the year so that the<br />
children can see the difference between a low volume summer river and a high volume winter river.<br />
Photographic records are very useful to remind children of what they have seen previously and to<br />
compare findings. Children can measure the depth and width of the river using metre sticks and<br />
tape measure, as well as the rate of flow using a floating object, metre stick and a stop watch Care<br />
should always be taken when doing work of this kind.<br />
Planning a New Town or Village<br />
Give the children a map of an appropriate area with a river, flood plain etc: and ask them to plan<br />
where they would build a new town or village. They need to give reasons why they have placed it<br />
where they have and why they have not sited it in other parts of the area.<br />
Planning A Factory Site<br />
Give the children a map of an appropriate area with a river, flood plain etc: You could use the same<br />
one as in the previous activity, or you might like to use one with a town or village already on it. Ask<br />
the children to plan where to site a new factory which will either have waste products which, after<br />
treatment, could be discharged into the river or requires the use of water from the river. Remind<br />
the children that they need to take into account other people or industries in the area, and the<br />
effect the new industry might have on them.<br />
Linking to Work on Ancient Egypt in History.<br />
Whilst doing work on Ancient Egypt or just afterwards investigate the River Nile. Cover the fact that<br />
in ancient times the natural flooding of the River Nile was used to aid irrigation of crops as well as<br />
providing fertile land to grow them on. Although this also led to problems for the population.<br />
Contrast this with the fact that in more recent times this flooding has been prevented following the<br />
building of dams on the river, which has meant that life is easier, but has meant that water has not<br />
been available in the same way for irrigation of crops and other means have had to be found.<br />
COPYRIGHT<br />
There is no copyright on original material published in<br />
<strong>teaching</strong> Primary <strong>Earth</strong> <strong>Science</strong> if it is required for<br />
<strong>teaching</strong> in the classroom. Copyright materials<br />
reproduced by permission of other publications rests<br />
with the original publishers.<br />
To reproduce original material from P.E.S.T. in other<br />
publications permission must be sought from the <strong>Earth</strong><br />
<strong>Science</strong> Primary working group via: Peter York, at the<br />
address below.<br />
This issue was devised and written by Niki Whitburn and<br />
edited by Graham Kitts.<br />
TO SUBSCRIBE TO: TEACHING PRIMARY EARTH SCIENCE<br />
send £5.00 made payable to ESTA.<br />
c/o Mr P York,<br />
346 Middlewood Road North,<br />
Oughtibridge,<br />
Sheffield S35 0HF
TEACHING EARTH SCIENCES ● Volume 27 ● Number 3, 2002<br />
The Stone Tapes: Building Stones in the<br />
History of the City of Nottingham<br />
GRAHAM LOTT<br />
From my days as a newly qualified geologist I still have a strong memory of an old BBC TV drama<br />
production called the Stone Tape. The main premise of the storyline was that the historic events<br />
that had occurred within a particular house were recorded in the stones of its walls and that these<br />
stories could, in the right circumstances, be ‘replayed’ in the present. To a great extent my<br />
subsequent career in geology, like that of many other geologists, has been spent in trying to<br />
understand the geological stories ‘recorded and told’ by such stones through studying their<br />
mineralogy and physical characteristics. Many of the techniques I learned I then found could be<br />
applied to the identification of the stones used in buildings and other structures. This has<br />
allowed me to take the story of the stones one step further by integrating their geological story<br />
with the history and origins of the buildings.<br />
The City of Nottingham, like most other cities<br />
in Britain, fortunately still has many such significant<br />
stories to tell through its stone buildings,<br />
despite the tribulations brought about by the sometimes<br />
catastrophic redevelopments of the 1960’s, 70’s<br />
and 80’s. Today, enlightened planners and architects<br />
have realised that conserving rather than demolishing<br />
historic buildings and landscapes has resulted in much<br />
more attractive and friendly city centre environments.<br />
Any study of building stones and their sources is<br />
very much intertwined with the development of first<br />
local, and later national transportation systems within<br />
an area (Lott 2001; BGS 2000). Throughout its history<br />
Nottingham has always taken full advantage of its position<br />
on one of the country’s major waterways, the River<br />
Trent. Its early development was very much reliant on<br />
the wealth generated from this river traffic. The river<br />
carried raw materials, like coal, lead, iron and stone,<br />
items too heavy for the existing overland trackways and<br />
embryonic road systems, from the mines and quarries<br />
of Derbyshire and north Nottinghamshire to the<br />
Humber estuary and beyond. Much of the building<br />
material that was needed for such a rapidly expanding<br />
city was imported using this river system which, from<br />
the late 18th century, was considerably improved by a<br />
series of local canal networks.<br />
As is typical of many cities, much of the older<br />
stonework is of local origin. The oldest stone buildings<br />
still surviving are the medieval churches of St Peter and<br />
St Mary. Though both have been much restored and<br />
added to over the centuries, the recently cleaned spire and<br />
surviving early stone fabric of St Peter’s, and the tower of<br />
St Mary’s, are constructed of large blocks of fine-grained<br />
sandstone from the local Triassic Sherwood Sandstone<br />
Group. The original quarries are now lost in the suburban<br />
developments of Sneinton and Gedling but they,<br />
together with quarries at Castle Donnington and Weston<br />
on Trent, sited just upstream on either side of the Trent,<br />
supplied a considerable amount of stone to the city until<br />
at least the late 18th century. Stone from these quarries is<br />
particularly well displayed in the Shire Hall (1770) (Galleries<br />
of Justice Museum), comprising large blocks of<br />
greenish or reddish-grey, cross-bedded sandstone, pockmarked<br />
by the erosion of the soft clay clasts that often<br />
characterise these fluvial, Triassic sandstones.<br />
The city is still dominated by its castle sitting high on<br />
St Mary’s Church:<br />
Local Triassic and<br />
Carboniferous<br />
Sandstones<br />
Shire Hall:<br />
Local Triassic<br />
sandstone.<br />
Mansfield Red<br />
pilasters<br />
85 www.esta-uk.org
TEACHING EARTH SCIENCES ● Volume 27 ● Number 3, 2002<br />
the ridge of Triassic sandstone that divides the city.<br />
This sandstone has, unfortunately, always proved to be<br />
too poorly cemented to provide good building stone<br />
and was more widely utilised in the creation of the<br />
warren of man-made caves that underlie much of the<br />
urban area (Charsley et al. 1990; Waltham 1996) and<br />
which much later encouraged the construction of the<br />
Nottingham via the Trent. This finer grained, sandy Permian<br />
dolomitic limestone is now only found in a few surviving<br />
buildings in the city. The Mansfield White variety,<br />
with its characteristic green clay seams, can be seen in the<br />
Nottingham Corn Exchange (1849-50) in Thurland<br />
Street and in the old Chapel (1815) on George Street.<br />
The more ferruginous Mansfield Red variety was much<br />
St Andrew’s<br />
Church:<br />
Bulwell<br />
Golden Stone<br />
(Magnesian<br />
Limestone),<br />
Ancaster<br />
Limestone quoins<br />
and mouldings,<br />
grey Lias<br />
limestone arches<br />
Wollaton Hall:<br />
Ancaster Stone<br />
many railway tunnels that cross-cut the city. Little<br />
appears to remain of the stonework of the original<br />
medieval castle, which figured so prominently in the<br />
city’s early history. What does remain, however, suggests<br />
that a considerable amount of local Permian<br />
dolomitic limestone together with assorted Carboniferous<br />
and Triassic sandstones, were used in its construction<br />
(Drage 1990). The present italianate ‘castle’<br />
(1674), built for the Duke of Newcastle was largely<br />
destroyed by fire in 1831. Today’s castle, restored by T.<br />
C. Hine (see above) survives as a Museum of Art and<br />
is built of strongly cross-bedded Carboniferous sandstone<br />
probably from nearby Derbyshire quarries, to the<br />
west, around Trowell, Stanton or Little Eaton.<br />
The most commonly seen stone within the city is the<br />
local Permian magnesian or dolomitic limestone (Cadeby<br />
Formation) from the Bulwell quarries (Bulwell Golden<br />
Stone), now also engulfed within the city’s northern<br />
suburbs. They provided stone for many Victorian industrial<br />
buildings, numerous churches (St Andrew (1869-<br />
71); Goldsmith St.) and schools (Nottingham High<br />
School (1866-7); Arboretum St.). This distinctive,<br />
coarsely crystalline, pale yellow-brown, dolomitic limestone<br />
formed the basis of a major local industry from at<br />
least the 16th century, but particularly flourished in the<br />
19th century. Not well suited for carved work, Bulwell<br />
Stone was often used as a wall stone together with pale<br />
yellow, Middle Jurassic Lincolnshire Limestone for the<br />
dressed quoins, window and door mouldings (All<br />
Saint’s Church (1863-4); Raleigh Street)<br />
In 1796 the Chesterfield Canal linked the Permian<br />
magnesian limestone quarries of the Mansfield area with<br />
sought after, both locally and nationally, for decorative<br />
stonework and often found in the door and window<br />
mouldings of larger houses and shop fronts.<br />
The Roman Foss Dyke that links Lincoln to the<br />
Trent provided the distant Ancaster quarries with<br />
access to Nottingham and, just outside the city centre,<br />
Wollaton Hall (1580-88), home of the coal magnate<br />
Francis Willoughby. Designed by Robert Smythson it<br />
was constructed largely of Ancaster Stone, together<br />
with some finer grained, Cadeby Formation dolomitic<br />
limestone, the former transported no doubt by using<br />
this ancient waterway to reach first the Trent and then<br />
Nottingham beyond.<br />
The gradual replacement of local stone by varieties<br />
imported from further afield, fuelled by the increasing<br />
industrial development in the city, reached its climax<br />
in the mid-late 19th century with the gradual establishment<br />
of the local rail network. Quickly replacing<br />
the canals as the best means for transporting heavy<br />
goods, and driven by the demands of many innovative<br />
Victorian architects, a wide range of new building<br />
stones and other building materials began to appear in<br />
the city. Most commonly, buildings of this period in<br />
the city show an increasing use of Derbyshire Carboniferous<br />
sandstones as in the solidly built old GPO<br />
Buildings (1895; Queen’s St.) and former Bank<br />
buildings (c.1872; Victoria St.), the latter mixing buff<br />
coloured sandstone with oolitic and shelly, Middle<br />
Jurassic, Lincolnshire Limestone.<br />
Leaving aside the legends of Robin Hood, the city of<br />
Nottingham is perhaps most-famed for its lace production.<br />
The industry still survives and was, in it heyday,<br />
www.esta-uk.org<br />
86
TEACHING EARTH SCIENCES ● Volume 27 ● Number 3, 2002<br />
housed close to the city centre in an area now known as<br />
the Lace Market. There has been considerable thought to<br />
the conservation of the numerous mill buildings that<br />
survive in this area and perhaps the jewel in the crown is<br />
the Adams Building (1855; now Clarendon College).<br />
The power, wealth and occasionally benevolent<br />
nature of some local Victorian mill owners in this<br />
industry is showcased in this recently restored building.<br />
T. C. Hine the architect designed an imposing<br />
entrance-way of ornately carved, pale yellow oolitic<br />
Lincolnshire Limestone (Ancaster Stone), with the<br />
street levels faced with harder, coarse grained Carboniferous<br />
sandstone from the Millstone Grit of Derbyshire.<br />
Inside, Adams provided a chapel and school for his<br />
workforce. The need for each mill owner to display his<br />
success through commissioning such exceptional<br />
buildings is clearly evident in the area.<br />
Like most Victorian cities local architects have played<br />
an important role in shaping the character of the city<br />
through their buildings. Nottingham had two such<br />
luminaries, Thomas C. Hine and Watson Fothergill.<br />
Hine from the early part of the 19th Century dominated<br />
the building contracts within the city. He often favoured<br />
brick but invariably used local stone for the more decorative<br />
parts of his designs, as in the Adams Building. As<br />
architect to the Duke of Newcastle Estate which included<br />
the castle, his influence is everywhere in the city. Watson<br />
Fothergill dominated the city’s architecture over the<br />
latter part of the century producing a far more flamboyant,<br />
polychromatic, architectural style. Strongly influenced<br />
by the gothic works of Burges and Street, many of<br />
his multifaceted buildings still survive. He used Derbyshire<br />
buff and grey Carboniferous sandstones, Mansfield<br />
Red dolomitic limestone, Upper Jurassic Portland<br />
Stone and a variety of Scottish granites in his Nottingham<br />
Express 1876 (Upper Parliament St.) and former<br />
National Westminster Bank 1877-82 (Thurland St.)<br />
buildings, which both typify his style.<br />
Better known nationally Augustus Welby Pugin,<br />
jointly with Charles Barry architect of the Palace of<br />
Westminster, was contracted to design the impressive,<br />
but very much plainer, St Barnabas (1841-4), Nottingham’s<br />
R. C. Cathedral. He used the local, greybrown<br />
Stancliffe Darley Dale (Ashover Grit) sandstone<br />
from Derbyshire.<br />
Industrial progress, particularly at the breakneck<br />
pace of the late 19th century was not without a price. As<br />
elsewhere the effects of coal-fired pollution had soiled<br />
and blackened many of the stone buildings in the city.<br />
In order to counteract these effects some architects,<br />
notably Alfred Waterhouse, began to use colourful<br />
glazed terracotta blocks that were thought to be more<br />
impervious to the pollutants. Waterhouse’s Prudential<br />
building (1896; King St.) in red terracotta with his characteristic<br />
animal casts and the bronzed Art Nouveau<br />
style of the shop front (1904; High Street) are just two<br />
of many such examples in the city.<br />
Growing Victorian cities like Nottingham were<br />
Adams Building:<br />
Ancaster Stone<br />
with Carboniferous<br />
Sandstone<br />
Nottingham<br />
Express Building:<br />
Carboniferous<br />
sandstone;<br />
Mansfield Red<br />
decoration<br />
87 www.esta-uk.org
TEACHING EARTH SCIENCES ● Volume 27 ● Number 3, 2002<br />
Arkwright<br />
Building:<br />
Ancaster Stone<br />
often conscious of their image and liked to portray not<br />
only their industrial success through their buildings but<br />
also their concerns for other aspects of everyday life<br />
such as the educational well being of their population.<br />
In 1881 the University College of Nottingham was<br />
founded and a new prestigious building was constructed<br />
in pseudo-gothic style (Arkwright Building (1888);<br />
Shakespeare St.) of Ancaster Stone. Although the University<br />
has subsequently moved to its present site outside<br />
the city centre the buildings now form part of the new<br />
city centre Nottingham Trent University campus.<br />
The last substantial classical style stone building to<br />
be constructed in the city was the new Council House<br />
(1927-29). The architect (T.C. Howitt) used white,<br />
oolitic Portland Stone to clad its immense iron framework.<br />
Portland Stone, from Dorset, subsequently<br />
became a common feature in many office buildings in<br />
this and many other UK cities during this period. It was<br />
also used in the new University Park buildings when<br />
the supply of its chosen sandstone, Darley Dale, proved<br />
unreliable and again in the Nottingham Trent University<br />
Newton buildings in the 1950’s.<br />
Today, the stories being told by the stones tell us yet<br />
again how transport systems have further evolved. Blue<br />
Pearl Larvikite and migmatite imported from Norway;<br />
travertine limestones and marbles from Italy; granites<br />
from India are all showcased in the city’s newer buildings<br />
and shopping malls. However, fewer and fewer<br />
stone buildings are being constructed of local stones.<br />
An encouraging exception is the Crown Court (1985;<br />
Canal St.) building constructed of pinkish, Carboniferous<br />
Birchover Sandstone from Derbyshire. The focus<br />
has now turned to preserving and utilising the built<br />
heritage of the city. As part of this process it essential not<br />
only in Nottingham, but elsewhere in the country, to<br />
continue to record and interpret the ‘messages’ being<br />
broadcast by our many surviving stone buildings, messages<br />
which are still, unfortunately, often being ignored.<br />
Some of these ‘stone tapes’ are in need of ‘re-recording’<br />
to pass on to new audiences before either they are<br />
irreparably damaged by inappropriate conservation<br />
techniques (Kennet 2001) or wiped clean forever (Harris<br />
1999). These ‘stone tapes’ form a major part of our<br />
built heritage and can tell us far more than just their<br />
geological history.<br />
References<br />
BGS (2000) Building Stone Resources of the United<br />
Kingdom (BGS Map 1:1,000,000 Scale).<br />
Charsley, T.J., Rathbone, P.A. and Lowe, D.J. (1990)<br />
Nottingham: A geological background to planning and<br />
development. British Geological Survey Technical<br />
Report WA/90/1<br />
Drage, C. (1990) Nottingham Castle. A Place Full Royal.<br />
Published by Nottingham Civic Society and the<br />
Thoroton Society of Nottinghamshire.<br />
Harris, J. (1999) No Voice from the Hall - Early Memories<br />
of a Country House Snooper. London: Joh Murrray.<br />
Kennet, P. (2002) Chemistry in the High Street.<br />
Teaching <strong>Earth</strong> <strong>Science</strong>s,<br />
27 (1), pp. 7-8.<br />
Lott, G.K. and Cobbing, J. (1996) Nottingham.<br />
Heritage in Stone. BGS <strong>Earth</strong>wise Publication.<br />
Lott, G.K. (2001) Geology and building stones in the<br />
East Midlands. Mercian Geologist, 15, pp. 97-122.<br />
Waltham, T. (1996) Sandstone Caves of Nottingham.<br />
East Midlands Geological Society.<br />
Published with the permission of the Director, British<br />
Geological Survey (NERC).<br />
Graham Lott<br />
British Geological Survey<br />
Keyworth<br />
Nottingham NG12 5GG<br />
www.esta-uk.org<br />
88
TEACHING EARTH SCIENCES ● Volume 27 ● Number 3, 2002<br />
Lost worlds:<br />
How Exceptional Fossils Reveal the Past<br />
MARK WILLIAMS<br />
Fossils constitute amazing evidence of lost worlds and this article provides four ‘snapshots’ of<br />
how they contribute to major scientific debates in the biological and geological sciences. The<br />
fossil ‘snapshots’ are: a half billion year old animal from Shropshire, fossilized in 3-dimensions<br />
with its soft anatomy, that indicates the presence of modern animal body plans in the Cambrian;<br />
small fossil crustaceans from the Ordovician of the American Midwest, which appear in Scotland,<br />
indicating the ancient geographical disposition of the continents; fossil mouthparts from the<br />
Moffat district, that identify predators in the Silurian marine abyss; and microfossil assemblages<br />
from ancient marine deposits of the Pacific Ocean that identify tsunamis. Fossils provide<br />
examples of the evolution of organisms and the biosphere from the Precambrian to the present.<br />
They can determine the positions of ancient continents and help to reconstruct complex ancient<br />
ecologies. Fossils can even be used to ‘fingerprint’ tsunami deposits and identify potential<br />
geological hazards.<br />
A half billion year old relative of crabs and lobsters<br />
In the ancient rocks of Shropshire are tiny fossilized<br />
marine animals only 0.3mm long, preserved with their<br />
entire soft anatomy (see Figures 1 and 2). So fine is the<br />
preservation that the animals even display the hairs on<br />
their legs. This would be amazing if they were one million<br />
years old. But in this case the fossils are from rocks<br />
deposited over half a billion years ago.<br />
The tiny fossils are bivalved crustaceans. Their head<br />
appendages are arranged in the same manner as that of<br />
modern crabs, lobsters and crayfish, with two pairs of<br />
antennae at the front, mandibles and maxillae (see Figure<br />
2). At over 511 million years old these are the<br />
grandfather of all tempura!<br />
The animals come from the Comley Limestones of<br />
1a<br />
Shropshire, part of the Lower Cambrian sequence of<br />
rocks that were deposited in a shallow sea at the margin<br />
of the early Palaeozoic marine Welsh Basin. They are<br />
the oldest complete animals preserved in 3-dimensions<br />
ever found. This kind of preservation is astonishing, as<br />
most fossils preserve only the hard shell or skeletal tissues.<br />
Coated in the mineral phosphate, the Shropshire<br />
animals were virtually ‘mummified’ alive, or preserved<br />
almost immediately after death. Either way, there was<br />
no chance for the decay of soft anatomy.<br />
The fossils are amazing in themselves, encased in<br />
limestone they waited half a billion years to be released<br />
from the rock by acid processing techniques in the laboratory.<br />
But their wider evolutionary significance is<br />
much greater, given that they occur in Lower Cambri-<br />
1b<br />
Figure 1:<br />
A fossil crustacean<br />
from the Lower<br />
Cambrian of<br />
Shropshire<br />
preserved with its<br />
soft-anatomy: a,<br />
oblique lateral<br />
view; b, ventral<br />
view (see also Fig.<br />
2). At more than<br />
511 million years<br />
old, this tiny<br />
fossil, just 0.3mm<br />
long, is the oldest<br />
3-dimensionally<br />
preserved<br />
complete animal<br />
ever found.<br />
89 www.esta-uk.org
TEACHING EARTH SCIENCES ● Volume 27 ● Number 3, 2002<br />
Figure 3:<br />
The small arthropod Kunmingella from the Lower Cambrian<br />
Chengjiang deposit of south China (about 520 million years old).<br />
The flattened specimen, about 5mm long, is preserved with most<br />
of its soft anatomy, including its head and body appendages.<br />
Once thought to be an ostracod, the preserved soft-anatomy of<br />
this animal indicates that it is not even a crustacean.<br />
Figure 2:<br />
The fossil<br />
crustacean from<br />
Shropshire<br />
reconstructed in<br />
ventral view (see<br />
also Fig. 1b). Two<br />
legs on the left<br />
side of the animal<br />
were lost during<br />
life or damaged<br />
after its death.<br />
an rocks. It is in these rocks that shelly fossils first<br />
appear in great numbers, as part of what is often<br />
referred to as the ‘Cambrian explosion’ of life. The<br />
Shropshire crustacean shows that complex animal body<br />
plans and animal behaviour already existed in the early<br />
Cambrian. That such complex animals existed at this<br />
time, poses the question of when their less derived animal<br />
ancestors began to evolve Was there a long evolutionary<br />
‘fuse’ extending back into the Precambrian<br />
The crustaceans from the Comley Limestones are<br />
just one of many instances of soft-bodied animals preserved<br />
in the Cambrian. Perhaps the most famous softbodied<br />
fauna is that of the Middle Cambrian Burgess<br />
Shale of British Columbia, Canada. But this fauna, like<br />
that of the Lower Cambrian soft-bodied fauna at<br />
Chengjiang, southern China (see Figure 3), is preserved<br />
as flattened impressions. The great beauty of the<br />
Shropshire find is that, preserved in 3-dimensions, the<br />
animals look as though they were alive just yesterday!<br />
Tiny Ordovician fossils from the American<br />
Midwest found in Scotland!<br />
In Oklahoma, in the American Midwest, there is a superb<br />
sequence of marine sedimentary rocks deposited during<br />
the Ordovician period, between about 500 and 440 million<br />
years ago. These outcrop in the Arbuckle Mountains,<br />
about 3-4 hours drive north of Dallas, Texas. The<br />
Ordovician rocks of Oklahoma are highly fossiliferous,<br />
bearing trilobites, brachiopods, corals, graptolites and<br />
many other fossil marine invertebrates. Amongst these<br />
are the tiny shells of ostracods (see Figure 4).<br />
Figure 4:<br />
The fossilized shell of the ostracod Steusloffina from the<br />
Ordovician. The figured species occurs in Caradoc-age rocks<br />
(about 450 million years old) of the Girvan district of Scotland,<br />
and is also widely documented from North America. The fossil is<br />
about 2mm long, with its anterior (head) end to the right.<br />
Ostracods are small bivalved crustaceans that typically<br />
are about 1 to 2mm long. Known from over 30,000<br />
species, they occupy all modern aquatic environments<br />
from peat bogs to the ocean depths. However, during<br />
the Ordovician the range of environments they occupied<br />
was limited to shallow to mid-shelf marine settings<br />
where they occurred amongst the sea-bottom<br />
dwelling marine benthos.<br />
The global patterns of Ordovician ostracod distribution<br />
can be used to map out the margins of ancient continents.<br />
When these ancient continents were separated<br />
by wide ocean barriers, ostracods were unable to<br />
migrate and faunas became highly provincial. But when<br />
continents drifted together, as a result of plate tectonic<br />
movements, ostracods migrated from one continent to<br />
another, and the faunas became cosmopolitan. By measuring<br />
these changes it is possible to track the relative<br />
position of ancient continents during the Ordovician.<br />
In Oklahoma, the Ordovician ostracod faunas<br />
www.esta-uk.org<br />
90
TEACHING EARTH SCIENCES ● Volume 27 ● Number 3, 2002<br />
belong to the Laurentia palaeocontinent (Figure 5), a<br />
landmass that comprised most of modern North America,<br />
but also Scotland, and which straddled the equator.<br />
We know that Scotland was part of Laurentia because it<br />
has the same Ordovician fossils as North America.<br />
Indeed, ostracods from the American Midwest can<br />
be found in Ordovician rocks at Girvan on the Ayrshire<br />
coast! To the south of Laurentia, separated by<br />
the intervening Iapetus (or Proto-Atlantic)<br />
Ocean, lay the Baltica palaeocontinent, modern<br />
Scandinavia. Further south was the Avalonia<br />
microcontinent, formed from parts of<br />
Europe, including England and Wales, and<br />
parts of eastern North America, including<br />
Nova Scotia and New Brunswick (see<br />
Figure 5). Still further south was the<br />
Gondwana supercontinent extending<br />
to the South Pole, where, during<br />
the late Ordovician, North Africa<br />
was situated.<br />
By looking at the Ordovician<br />
ostracods from Oklahoma and<br />
Scotland and comparing them to<br />
those of England and Wales, the<br />
relative palaeogeographical position<br />
of the Avalonia and Laurentia palaeocontinents<br />
can be tracked. In early late<br />
Ordovician times, about 455 million years ago (see<br />
Figure 5), the ostracods of England and Wales were<br />
very different from those of Scotland or Oklahoma.<br />
But, by latest Ordovician times, about 440 million<br />
years ago, they shared numerous species in common,<br />
indicating that there was free migration of ostracods<br />
between these palaeocontinents. Together with other<br />
palaeontological, geological and palaeomagnetic data,<br />
this indicates that Avalonia had drifted north towards<br />
Laurentia and that the intervening Iapetus Ocean had<br />
narrowed and was about to close. Indeed, Scotland<br />
was about to be joined to England and Wales for the<br />
first time, about 440 to 430 million years ago.<br />
Ostracods can be used for reconstructions of<br />
Ordovician palaeogeography globally. Thus, the ostracod<br />
faunas of the Argentine Precordillera are different<br />
from those of the rest of South America until the late<br />
Ordovician (see Figure 5). It was at this time, about 440<br />
million years ago, that the Precordillera microcontinent,<br />
which had split off from North America much<br />
earlier during the Cambrian, finally docked with the<br />
rest of South America.<br />
Ostracod fossils may be diminutive in size, but their<br />
distribution patterns can nonetheless have global significance<br />
for reconstructions of ancient geography.<br />
Figure 5:<br />
Reconstruction of palaeogeography for the Caradoc Series of the Ordovician, about 450<br />
million years ago. England and Wales lie on the Avalonia palaeocontinent south of the<br />
equator, whilst Scotland is situated on the Laurentia palaeocontinent to the north.<br />
Intervening is the Iapetus Ocean. As Avalonia drifted northwards towards Laurentia during<br />
the late Ordovician, the ostracod faunas of the two continental areas became progressively<br />
more cosmopolitan as widespread migration took place. Many species were common to<br />
Laurentia and Avalonia by latest Ordovician times (about 440 million years ago).<br />
Figure 6:<br />
A rare conodont bedding plane assemblage from southern<br />
Scotland. Several paired Elements (‘teeth’) are visible lying<br />
adjacent to a lower Silurian graptolite (top of picture). The whole<br />
conodont assemblage is about 1cm long. At about 435 million<br />
years old, this is the oldest near complete vertebrate mouthpart<br />
apparutus ever found in Scotland.<br />
Ancient fossil mouthparts from the Silurian<br />
marine abyss<br />
At about 1cm long, a newly discovered conodont<br />
mouthpart assemblage from the Silurian of southern<br />
Scotland may not look very threatening (see Figure 6).<br />
91 www.esta-uk.org
TEACHING EARTH SCIENCES ● Volume 27 ● Number 3, 2002<br />
component of the marine plankton biomass in deeper<br />
water settings of the early Palaeozoic. But if this is so,<br />
surely something must have been eating them Despite<br />
the millions of graptolites recovered, virtually none<br />
show evidence of bite marks, mastication or occurrence<br />
in coprolites (fossil dung).<br />
The Scottish conodont mouthpart association<br />
strongly suggests that predators were living with the<br />
graptolites in the overlying water column. It indicates a<br />
much more complex ancient ecology than could be<br />
gleaned from the graptolite fossils alone. Given that<br />
there is also evidence for fossilized marine worms in<br />
the newly discovered association, which may also have<br />
been predators, the fossil find from southern Scotland<br />
provides much evidence for the existence of complex<br />
ecosystems in the Silurian marine abyss.<br />
Figure 7:<br />
Foraminifera are unicellular eukaryotic organisms (Protists) that<br />
construct a calcium carbonate or agglutinated shell. They range<br />
through a vast array of different marine and brackish water<br />
environments and are powerful indices of ecology. The specimens<br />
shown are shallow marine forms from the Pacific region, and are<br />
between 0.5 to 2mm in size.<br />
Nevertheless, it provides evidence for predators in the<br />
Silurian seas and, at around 435 million years old, is the<br />
oldest near complete vertebrate mouthpart apparatus<br />
ever found in Scotland.<br />
Conodonts were early vertebrates with a somewhat<br />
‘eel-like’ body-morphology. They possessed hard<br />
mouthparts, rather like teeth, collectively arranged as a<br />
kind of ‘jaw’. Most conodonts are known only from<br />
these ‘teeth’, which typically became dissociated after<br />
the animal’s death. Only very rarely are the ‘teeth’,<br />
more correctly termed ‘conodont elements’, preserved<br />
in association. Such finds are very important for interpreting<br />
the way in which these animals were eating, and<br />
also for meaningful taxonomic assessment of their close<br />
biological affinities.<br />
The Silurian rocks in which the conodont mouthparts<br />
were found, are thought to have been deposited in<br />
a deep sea setting. They comprise black, organic rich<br />
mudstones, accumulated on the sea floor under anoxic<br />
sea bottom conditions, probably in an ocean-facing<br />
marine basin. Fossils in these rocks are mainly graptolites,<br />
colonial marine organisms that produced a rigid<br />
protein skeleton. These lived in the overlying water<br />
column but sank to the sea bottom after death, to be<br />
locked into the sediments. Millions of graptolite fossils<br />
have been recovered in southern Scotland and from<br />
similar rocks in the English Lake District, Wales and<br />
worldwide. These animals evidently formed a huge<br />
Small fossils make big waves in the Pacific Ocean<br />
In the Pacific Ocean tsunamis strike with alarming regularity<br />
and cause extensive damage and loss of life: in<br />
the recent Papua New Guinea tsunami of 1998 over a<br />
thousand people were killed.<br />
Tsunamis are generated by large scale geological phenomena<br />
such as earthquakes, or the movement of large<br />
slumps of sediment on the continental shelf or slope, or<br />
more rarely are caused by bolide impacts. The resulting<br />
shock waves from these effects can generate “tidal waves”<br />
of hundreds of metres, which are capable of picking up<br />
rock boulders the size of houses and depositing them<br />
onshore. Recognising the rock deposits formed by past<br />
tsunami can help to determine their periodicity and causal<br />
effects. In this way the potentially devastating effects of<br />
future tsunamis can be identified before they occur.<br />
Shell assemblages in recent and ancient sedimentary<br />
deposits can provide a characteristic signature, a kind of<br />
‘genetic-fingerprinting’ for tsunami. Such tsunamidiagnostic<br />
assemblages have been recognised in ancient<br />
rock deposits from the Pacific to the Mediterranean.<br />
Thus, on the Polynesian islands of the Pacific, coastal<br />
sedimentary rocks previously interpreted as beach<br />
deposits, can be ‘fingerprinted’ as tsunami deposits by<br />
their macrofaunal and microfaunal content. Such<br />
deposits contain many shell fragments of typical marine<br />
invertebrates such as bivalves and gastropods, together<br />
with abundant foraminifera and ostracods. Foraminifera<br />
are ‘large’ millimetre scale unicellular organisms which<br />
produce a calcium carbonate or agglutinated shell, and<br />
which include sea-bottom dwelling and planktonic<br />
forms (see Figure 7; see also the article by Ian Wilkinson<br />
in this volume, page 78).<br />
The faunal signature of tsunami deposits in Polynesia<br />
can be very distinctive. Ongoing work by British<br />
Geological Survey scientists shows that the larger<br />
invertebrate fauna are pummelled to fragments of less<br />
than 1mm size. The microfauna are winnowed to<br />
remove both the smaller (immature) sea-bottom<br />
foraminifera, and the more buoyant planktonic<br />
foraminifera. This leaves a ‘skewed’ assemblage of<br />
www.esta-uk.org<br />
92
TEACHING EARTH SCIENCES ● Volume 27 ● Number 3, 2002<br />
robust, mature, sea-bottom forms, which are clearly<br />
not representative of an original living population. As<br />
the fauna are also transported onshore by the tsunami,<br />
there is a landwards displacement of environment-specific,<br />
often incompatible faunas, ripped-up from different<br />
ecologies as the tsunami approaches shore. The<br />
distinctive faunal assemblage that this produces, a winnowed,<br />
pummelled, mixed fauna from different marine<br />
communities, ‘fingerprints’ the high-energy milieu of<br />
deposition and distinguishes the deposits as the product<br />
of a tsunami.<br />
Conclusions: the importance of fossils<br />
Notwithstanding their immense value for the relative<br />
dating and correlation of rock sequences, the ‘snapshots’<br />
presented here indicate the wider geological and<br />
biological applications of fossils. Fossils are the key evidence<br />
for the processes of evolution viewed in the long,<br />
geological time-frame and, when preserved with their<br />
soft anatomy, provide immense detail about past global<br />
biodiversity. The distributional patterns of fossils can be<br />
used to track the positions of ancient continents, and to<br />
reconstruct complex ancient ecosystems. Fossils can be<br />
things of great aesthetic beauty, but have a much more<br />
practical role when they ‘fingerprint’ geological hazards<br />
such as tsunami.<br />
References<br />
The following references provide more detailed information<br />
about the ‘Cambrian explosion’, ancient palaeogeography,<br />
conodonts and tsunamis. For animations and<br />
much more information about tsunamis visit the United<br />
States National Ocean and Atmospheric Administration<br />
website at: http://www.pmel.noaa.gov/tsunami/<br />
http://www.pmel.noaa.gov/tsunami/<br />
An excellent general guide to fossils is the book by<br />
Richard Fortey given below.<br />
Cocks, L.R.M. (2000) The early Palaeozoic Geography<br />
of Europe. Journal of the Geological Society, London,<br />
157, pp. 1-10.<br />
Fortey, R. (2002) Fossils: The Key to the Past. Third Edition.<br />
London: Natural History Museum<br />
Keating, B.H., Waythomas, C.F. & Dawson, A.G. (2000)<br />
Landslides and Tsunamis. Birkhäuser Verlag. Basel-<br />
Boston-Berlin.<br />
Purnell, M. A., Donoghue, P. C. J. & Aldridge, R. J. (2000)<br />
Orientation and anatomical notation in conodonts.<br />
Journal of Paleontology, 74, pp. 113-122.<br />
Siveter, D.J., Williams, M. & Walossek, D. (2001)<br />
A phosphatocopid crustacean with appendages from<br />
the Lower Cambrian. <strong>Science</strong>, 293, pp. 479-481.<br />
Dr Mark Williams FGS CGeol<br />
British Geological Survey,<br />
Keyworth,<br />
Nottingham NG12 5GG<br />
Email: mwilli@bgs.ac.uk<br />
Acknowledgments<br />
David Siveter and Mark Purnell of Leicester<br />
University, Dieter Walossek of Ulm University,<br />
Maxine Akhurst and James Floyd of BGS<br />
Edinburgh, and Ian Wilkinson and Dave Tappin of<br />
BGS Nottingham are collaborators on various<br />
aspects of the work detailed here. The<br />
reconstruction used in Figure 2 was drawn by<br />
Dieter Walossek and Chris Wardle. The<br />
reconstruction of Ordovician palaeogeography<br />
used in Figure 5 is courtesy of Mike Bassett and<br />
Leonid Popov of the National Museum of Wales.<br />
The image of foraminifera used in Figure 7 is<br />
courtesy of Ian Wilkinson. Thanks to Vicki Ward<br />
of Abbot Beyne School, Burton-on-Trent, for<br />
information about the A-Level Geology<br />
curriculum. Many of the specimens figured here<br />
are in the museum collection of the British<br />
Geological Survey at Keyworth, Nottingham.<br />
Images are available from the author by request.<br />
This article is published with the permission of the<br />
Director, British Geological Survey (N.E.R.C.).<br />
93 www.esta-uk.org
TEACHING EARTH SCIENCES ● Volume 27 ● Number 3, 2002<br />
From Flood to Drought and Back Again<br />
BRIAN WATERS<br />
This paper is based on some work that looked at the Potential Impacts of Climate Change in the<br />
East Midlands on behalf of the East Midlands Sustainable Development Round Table (emsdOt)<br />
and future climate scenarios in the West Midlands for the Environment Agency. These were two of<br />
a number of regional and sectoral studies, some of which can be accessed through the web site<br />
of the UK Climate Impact Programme (www.ukcip.org.uk).<br />
Everyone must have heard by now of the changing<br />
climate and its likely causes due to emissions of<br />
greenhouse gases, especially carbon dioxide from<br />
the combustion of fossil fuels. Several studies have<br />
looked at the likely future climate scenarios based on<br />
assumptions of future trends in carbon dioxide concentrations<br />
in the atmosphere. In 1998 UKCIP published a<br />
report for the UK (Hulme and Jenkins, 1998) and this<br />
was the starting point for the East Midlands study.<br />
One of the team involved in the study used a technique<br />
of downscaling to produce scenarios for the East<br />
Midlands of temperature and rainfall (East Midlands<br />
Sustainable Development Round Table, 2000). The<br />
Environment Agency commissioned similar work for<br />
the West Midlands (Environment Agency, 2001a).<br />
More recently, the scenarios for the whole of the UK<br />
have been updated (Hulme et al, 2002) to produce<br />
maps at a 50km scale giving similar information about<br />
predicted scenarios for 2020, 2050 and 2080. The scenarios<br />
show predictions for annual averages and seasonal<br />
changes in temperature and rainfall for a range<br />
from low to high future carbon dioxide emissions. All<br />
the scenarios imply increases in emissions, just at different<br />
rates. Picking one of these – the Medium High<br />
Scenario – Table 1 shows how the predictions have<br />
changed between 1998 and 2002 for the East Midlands.<br />
Although there are differences in detail, the broad<br />
picture looks the same:<br />
● Increased average temperatures<br />
● Hotter drier summers<br />
● Warmer wetter winters<br />
The changes look modest but an increase of 3ºC in<br />
average temperature ought to be compared with a 5º<br />
difference between average temperatures now and the<br />
last ice age. In addition the studies are predicting:<br />
● More extreme events such as periods of intense rainfall<br />
and drought.<br />
● Less frost and snow.<br />
● Rising sea levels due to expansion of the sea and<br />
melting of polar and glacial ice caps (compounded by<br />
relative changes in land level due to geological events<br />
in some locations such as the East Coast).<br />
These changes will have profound effects and the purpose<br />
of the impact studies is to look at these both in<br />
terms of their local significance and across sectors such<br />
as agriculture, wildlife, industry and health.<br />
For the Environment Agency the impacts are also<br />
significant. It regulates and manages water resources,<br />
flood defence, water quality and fisheries along with air<br />
and land quality.<br />
Increasing temperatures and reduced summer rainfall<br />
are expected to increase the demand for water for<br />
domestic and commercial use. For example, people will<br />
shower more and want to water their gardens, agriculture<br />
will want to irrigate more and industry will require<br />
more cooling water. There are already problems with<br />
water supply in some areas where falling groundwater<br />
levels due to over abstraction and low stream flows during<br />
dry periods mean that restrictions are imposed on<br />
abstractors most years. Changes in water availability<br />
also affect wetlands and other water features which<br />
have a consequential effect on wildlife. The Environment<br />
Agency has recently published a series of Water<br />
Resources Strategies (Environment Agency, 2001b)<br />
which start to address these problems. Everyone is<br />
Table 1 Changing Scenarios For East Midlands 2080-2100<br />
The table shows how little the Medium-High scenarios for temperature and precipitation towards<br />
the end of this century have changed with improvements in climate models used in 1998 and 2002.<br />
UKCIP 1998 UKCIP 2002<br />
Temperature Change o C Annual +2.8 to +3.2 +3.0 to +3.5<br />
Summer +2.5 to +3.0 +3.0 to +4.0<br />
Winter +3.0 to +3.5 +2.0 to +3.0<br />
Precipitation % Change Annual +4 to +9 +0 to -10<br />
Summer -15 to -30 -40 to -50<br />
Winter +23 to +30 +20 to +30<br />
www.esta-uk.org<br />
94
TEACHING EARTH SCIENCES ● Volume 27 ● Number 3, 2002<br />
familiar with the problems of drought in many third<br />
world countries but the UK is likely to find itself in a<br />
similar, if not so critical, position. Even so, the Water<br />
Resources Strategies highlight that the annual effective<br />
rainfall per head of population in parts of the UK is<br />
already less than in countries such as Ethiopia.<br />
The response has to include ensuring that new water<br />
resources are made available but not before demand has<br />
been reduced through improving water efficiency.<br />
Much can be done to reduce demand by using waterefficient<br />
appliances, reducing waste and leakage and<br />
adopting trickle irrigation.<br />
At the other extreme, intense storms at any time of<br />
year can produce local flooding. Wetter winters are also<br />
likely to increase the risk of more widespread flooding<br />
as catchments become saturated and unable to absorb<br />
heavier rainfall. Sea level rise also increases the risk of<br />
coastal flooding. There have been several major floods<br />
in the last five years affecting large parts of the country.<br />
It is too early to say with confidence that these are due<br />
to climate change as there are natural variations in climate<br />
and flooding frequency anyway. However, they<br />
are certainly indicative of the sort of events that can be<br />
expected more frequently as this century progresses.<br />
The responses to the increased risk of flooding<br />
include building more defences along river banks and<br />
coastal stretches, improving flood prediction tools and<br />
warning systems and raising awareness among the population<br />
at risk. Nearly 2 million properties are in areas at<br />
some risk of flooding but many residents are unaware<br />
because there has not been flooding in recent years. The<br />
areas at risk are shown in indicative flood plain maps<br />
which can be found on the Environment Agency’s web<br />
site at www.environment-agency.gov.uk. Insurance companies<br />
are naturally showing an interest as the damage<br />
over the last few years has escalated. They are loading<br />
premiums for property in flood risk areas and pressing<br />
the Government to provide more money for flood<br />
defence under threat of withdrawing cover.<br />
There is little sense in producing more problems for<br />
the future by building more properties in the flood<br />
plains so the Environment Agency works closely with<br />
local planning authorities to ensure that this does not<br />
happen. Local flooding is also made worse by increased<br />
rates of run off from developments such as paved areas<br />
and roof drainage. The Environment Agency is keen to<br />
promote sustainable drainage through techniques such<br />
as porous pavements, soakaways and retention wetlands<br />
to store the water underground or at least attenuate the<br />
rate of run off.<br />
The changes in temperature and water regime will<br />
affect wildlife and there are many recorded instances of<br />
alien species appearing, losses of some species and<br />
extended growing seasons. New crops such as maize,<br />
grapes and sunflowers are appearing. Some of these<br />
changes could be beneficial, offering new markets for<br />
farmers and a wider, or at least different, diversity of<br />
wildlife. Decisions will have to be made about whether it<br />
is sensible to try to preserve habitats against the climatic odds, or whether it<br />
would be more sensible to go with nature and help species to adapt or move<br />
to better areas.<br />
Climate change will also impact on a wide range of other sectors. Health<br />
risks from exotic diseases, damage to roads, rail and other infrastructure,<br />
and loss of markets for some products but increases for others (example:<br />
equipment for heating and air conditioning). Will working patterns become<br />
more like those in southern Europe Will there be a renaissance in tourism<br />
in the UK as the current popular resorts become unpleasantly hot These<br />
are the sorts of questions addressed by the regional and sectoral studies.<br />
Whichever of the climate scenarios proves eventually to be the one that<br />
happens, they run close together in the early years and only diverge towards<br />
the middle of this century. The outlook for the next 50 years or so is for an<br />
annual average temperature rise of between 1 and 2 degrees. This is largely<br />
unavoidable even if we cut our use of fossil fuels dramatically now. The best<br />
that can be hoped for is that the Kyoto agreement is ratified and forms the<br />
basis for future cuts of greenhouse gas emissions of up to 60% or more.<br />
There are lots of opportunities to bring climate change issues into<br />
schools. The UKCIP web site has many publications which can be a source<br />
of information on local impact studies or specific to sectors such as health,<br />
agriculture of wildlife. These could form the basis for a detailed look at the<br />
potential impacts in the school catchment. In addition, looking at the<br />
school’s use of energy for heating and lighting, local transport issues, water<br />
use and flood risk all help to raise awareness of the difficulties in mitigation<br />
and adaptation.<br />
Dr Brian Waters, recently retired as Regional Water Manager for the Midlands<br />
Region of the Environment Agency.<br />
References<br />
East Midlands Sustainable Development Round Table (2000) The Potential<br />
Impacts of Climate Change in the east Midlands, Summary Report, available<br />
from Environment Agency, 550 Streetsbrook Road, Solihull, B91 1QT<br />
and at www.ukcip.org.uk<br />
Environment Agency, (2001a) State of the Environment Report; West Midlands<br />
Region, available from Environment Agency, 550 Streetsbrook Road,<br />
Solihull, B91 1QT. A more detailed report “Climate Change in the West<br />
Midlands” is available from the same address.<br />
Environment Agency, (2001b), Water Resources for the Future: A Strategy for<br />
England and Wales, March 2001. Available, along with Regional appendices,<br />
from Environment Agency offices.<br />
Hulme, M., Jenkins, G.J. (1998) Climate Scenarios for the UK: scientific<br />
report. UKCIP Technical Report No. 1, Climatic Research Unit, Norwich, UK,<br />
80pp.<br />
Hulme, M., Jenkins, G.J., Lu, X., Turnpenny, J.R., Mitchell, T.D., Jones,<br />
R.G., Lowe, J., Murphy, J.M., Hassell, D., Boorman, P., McDonald, R.,<br />
and Hill, S. (2002); Climate Change Scenarios for the United Kingdom: The<br />
UKCIP02 Scientific Report, Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research,<br />
School 0f Environmental <strong>Science</strong>s, University of East Anglia, Norwich,<br />
UK. 120pp. Available at www.ukcip.org.uk<br />
95 www.esta-uk.org
TEACHING EARTH SCIENCES ● Volume 27 ● Number 3, 2002<br />
ESTA Conference 2003:<br />
“<strong>Earth</strong> <strong>Science</strong>s in the 21st Century”<br />
University of Manchester, 12th-14th September 2003<br />
The next ESTA Course and Conference, hosted by the University of Manchester Department of <strong>Earth</strong> <strong>Science</strong>s in<br />
conjunction with the Manchester Museum, promises to be a most informative and enjoyable affair. Manchester<br />
occupied much of our television viewing in the summer when the city hosted the 2002 Commonwealth Games,<br />
and then gained (geological) fame again recently with a series of small (but certainly perceptible!) earthquakes. The<br />
city of Manchester is enjoying a renaissance, and the centre is now a thriving village of loft apartments, striking<br />
modern architecture, pleasant shopping areas, clubs and restaurants. Thanks to the Games, Manchester now has<br />
some of the finest sports and leisure facilities in the country. The city is within easy reach of some of the finest<br />
scenery and geological sites in the country: the Peak District, the Pennines, and the Cheshire Plain – destinations<br />
of some of our Sunday field workshops.<br />
The venue for the Friday and Saturday workshops, lectures and exhibitions will be the Department of <strong>Earth</strong> <strong>Science</strong>s<br />
laboratories and lecture rooms, as well as facilities in the Education Section of the Manchester Museum,<br />
immediately opposite across Oxford Road. Coffee, tea and lunches will also be served here. The Museum has been<br />
refurbished recently, and the geological galleries are a delight. Delegates will also see some of the new geochemical<br />
laboratories in <strong>Earth</strong> <strong>Science</strong>s.<br />
Accommodation for delegates will be in comfortable en-suite rooms at Hulme Hall, just 10 minutes’ walk away<br />
from the university and museum. Breakfast, evening meals, Conference Dinner, bar and Open Lectures will be<br />
held at Hulme Hall. For those wishing to explore a little further, Hulme Hall is situated at the start of the ‘curry<br />
mile’ – more than 50 neon-lit Asian restaurants in actually about half a mile.<br />
Provisional Programme<br />
Friday 12th September<br />
INSET for local teachers and ESTA members, all day.<br />
● Key Stages 1/2 –<br />
● Key Stages 3/4 –<br />
● Post-16 – Update for teachers of Geology at AS/A Level, largely led by Manchester staff.<br />
● Higher Education<br />
Saturday 13th September<br />
The programme is yet to be arranged, but will consist largely of updating lectures and workshops. Whilst the majority<br />
of these will be of interest to teachers of Geology to AS and A Level, much will be relevant to teachers of <strong>Earth</strong> <strong>Science</strong><br />
at all Key Stages. As well as some specific provision for Primary and lower Secondary teachers, attendance at the<br />
full day will result in greater confidence through the acquisition of more background knowledge of the subject.<br />
Sunday 14th September<br />
● Fieldwork in the local region, with a choice of visits to be arranged.<br />
Attendance is open to all with an interest in <strong>Earth</strong> science education, on a day visit, or a residential basis. (You do<br />
not need to be an ESTA member). There will be Open Lectures on Saturday which will be free: there are fees for<br />
other aspects of the conference, to cover refreshments and the usual overheads.<br />
The convenor, Dr Paul Selden, will be pleased to supply further details and a booking form for the whole conference,<br />
once these become available in the Spring of 2003.<br />
For further information, contact the Conference Convenor: Dr Paul Selden, Dept of <strong>Earth</strong> <strong>Science</strong>s, University<br />
of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL. Tel: 0161 275 3296; email: Paul.Selden@man.ac.uk<br />
Meanwhile, visit these websites:<br />
http://www.man.ac.uk............................................University of Manchester<br />
http://www.earth.man.ac.uk...................................Department of <strong>Earth</strong> <strong>Science</strong>s (inc. a section on the recent earthquakes)<br />
http://museum.man.ac.uk ......................................The Manchester Museum<br />
http://www.man.ac.uk/conferences/hulme.html ....Hulme Hall<br />
http://www.manchester.com...................................Virtual Manchester<br />
www.esta-uk.org<br />
96
TEACHING EARTH SCIENCES ● Volume 27 ● Number 3, 2002<br />
Reviews<br />
Geology and building stones in Wales (north) / Daereg a cherrig adeiladau yng<br />
Nghymru (y gogledd); Geology and building stones in Wales (south) / Daereg a cherrig<br />
adeiladau yng Nghymru (y de).<br />
Graham Lott and Bill Barclay. Folded sheets 42x30cm;<br />
British Geological Survey 2002, Keyworth, Nottingham NG123 5GG.<br />
£1.95 each. ISBN 0-85272-423-3; 0-85272-422-5.<br />
These two pamphlets are published<br />
by the Geological Survey, but<br />
produced in association with<br />
CADW (Welsh Historical Monuments),<br />
the National Museums and Galleries of<br />
Wales and the Countryside Council for<br />
Wales. They are printed on thin glazed<br />
card, presumably for protection when<br />
carried in the field. Each carries a<br />
bilingual (Welsh and English) text:<br />
Welsh on one side and English on the<br />
other, but with a single set of<br />
photographs, and an appropriate and<br />
simplified geological map.<br />
For each pamphlet, there is a brief<br />
account of the geology of the region,<br />
together with reference to the use of the<br />
rocks in buildings (e.g. the purple<br />
Caerbwdi sandstones of the Cambrian<br />
for the building of St. David’s cathedral).<br />
Illustrations, necessarily quite small, are<br />
given of representative or important<br />
buildings. These range from the<br />
prehistoric huts at Din Lligwy, Anglesey,<br />
and a terraced house in Pontypridd, to<br />
castles and railway viaducts. In addition<br />
to the use of Welsh stone (usually locally<br />
sourced) there is also a section in each<br />
pamphlet on Foreign stones. It is pointed<br />
out that there are few good freestones in<br />
Wales, and that easily worked stones have<br />
been imported from a variety of foreign<br />
sources, such as Bath and Portland<br />
stones. These have principally been used<br />
from the middle of the nineteenth<br />
century, and also mainly for important<br />
buildings, whether civic, religious or<br />
commercial. Decorative stones are given<br />
a paragraph in each pamphlet: again<br />
there are not many Welsh stones that are<br />
suitable, and so imported stones are<br />
prevalent. Each pamphlet has a<br />
geological column, listing not only the<br />
geological periods, but also the principal<br />
building stones found (the column in<br />
English only). Finally, there is a list of<br />
important geologists (all deceased) who<br />
have worked in Wales, listed in order of<br />
dates of birth, ranging from G. Owen<br />
(1552-1613) and E. Lhuyd (1660-1613)<br />
to R.M. Cummings (1926-1995).<br />
The geological maps also show the<br />
locations of the buildings illustrated, and<br />
it is of interest that, with the exception of<br />
the Old College Building in Aberystwyth<br />
(incorrectly described as being of<br />
Grinshill Stone – it is mainly of Cefn<br />
Sandstone), no other buildings are<br />
shown in Wales south of Harlech and<br />
north of St. David,s. I would have liked<br />
to see some illustration of , for example,<br />
the houses of Dolgellau, constructed of<br />
almost monolithic blocks of local<br />
igneous rocks, or of the many uses of<br />
greywackes in Mid Wales.<br />
The authors and publishers are to be<br />
congratulated on having produced<br />
concise, informative and attractive<br />
publications, widening our knowledge of<br />
Welsh building stones from just the slate<br />
industry, to take in rocks of all ages, and<br />
in all situations. May we look forward to<br />
seeing this series extended to cover areas<br />
in the rest of Britain<br />
Denis Bates<br />
University of Wales,<br />
Aberyswyth<br />
97 www.esta-uk.org
Your President<br />
Introduced<br />
Activities to Develop<br />
Thinking Ski ls in<br />
Activities and<br />
Demonstrations:<br />
<strong>Earth</strong>quakes<br />
Response to the<br />
House of Commons<br />
<strong>Science</strong> and<br />
Technology Commi t e<br />
inquiry into the<br />
<strong>Science</strong> Cu riculum for<br />
group - West Wales<br />
Geology Teachers’<br />
Network<br />
Highlights from the<br />
post-16 ‘bring and<br />
share’ se sion a the<br />
ESTA Conference,<br />
update<br />
B ok Reviews<br />
Websearch<br />
News and Resources<br />
rth <strong>Science</strong><br />
ache<br />
Browne<br />
Websearch<br />
TEACHING EARTH SCIENCES ● Volume 27 ● Number 3, 2002<br />
ESTA Diary<br />
Reviews<br />
JANUARY 2003<br />
Friday 3rd - Sunday 5th January<br />
ASE, University of Birmingham.<br />
[Sat 4th is <strong>Earth</strong> <strong>Science</strong> day]<br />
APRIL 2003<br />
Wednesday 16th April<br />
10:00 to 16:30 Mineral collecting and<br />
conservation – hammering out a future<br />
Harold Riley Suite, University of Salford<br />
Wednesday 23rd - Friday 25th April<br />
Geographical <strong>Association</strong> Annual<br />
Conference<br />
University of Derby<br />
SEPTEMBER 2003<br />
8th - 12th September<br />
The BA Festival of <strong>Science</strong> 2003<br />
University of Salford<br />
Friday 12th - Sunday 14th September<br />
ESTA Annual Conference<br />
University of Manchester<br />
SEPTEMBER 2004<br />
6th - 10th September<br />
The BA Festival of <strong>Science</strong> 2004<br />
University of Exeter<br />
To Advertise in<br />
<strong>teaching</strong><br />
EARTH<br />
SCIENCES<br />
Telephone<br />
Ian Ray<br />
0161 486 0326<br />
<strong>teaching</strong><br />
EARTH<br />
SCIENCES<br />
Journal of the EARTH SCIENCE TEACHERS’ ASSOCIATION<br />
Volume 26 ● Number 4, 2001 ● ISSN 0957-8005<br />
Martin Whiteley<br />
Thinking Geology:<br />
Geology Teaching<br />
Recovering the<br />
Leaning Tower of Pisa<br />
<strong>Earth</strong> <strong>Science</strong><br />
14 - 19 year olds<br />
Se ting up a local<br />
Kingston 2 01<br />
ESTA Conference<br />
www.esta-uk.org<br />
Discovering Geology: Fossil Focus, Graptolites.<br />
Ian Wilkinson, Susan Rigby and Jan Zalasiewicz.<br />
An <strong>Earth</strong>wise publication; folded sheet 42x30cm;<br />
British Geological Survey 2001, Keyworth, Nottingham NG123 5GG.<br />
ISBN 0-85-272390-3. £1.95.<br />
This double-sided sheet, printed on<br />
stout glazed card, follows the<br />
format established in a number of<br />
publications by the British Geological<br />
Survey, packing a concise account of<br />
graptolites into a minimum of space.<br />
Colour is used both in the photographs<br />
of individual graptolites, and also to great<br />
effect in the diagrams.<br />
The first panel deals with the<br />
morphology of the graptolites, and with<br />
their presumed modern relatives, the<br />
hemichordates. A good cutaway diagram<br />
of a Climacograptus shows the general<br />
structure, together with a diagram of a<br />
Didymograptus (described unfortunately<br />
as a “tuning folk graptoloid”!). Though<br />
this may be seen as a quibble, this latter<br />
diagram seems too diagrammatic: the<br />
two stipes appear to emerge from<br />
opposite sides of the sicula, and the<br />
sicula has a bulbous proximal end, rather<br />
than tapering to an extended nema.<br />
The second panel covers the range of<br />
morphologies exhibited by the<br />
Journal of the EARTH SCIENCE TEACHERS’ ASSOCIATION<br />
Volume 27 ● Number 1, 2002 ● ISSN 0957-8005<br />
<strong>teaching</strong><br />
EARTH<br />
SCIENCES<br />
rth <strong>Science</strong><br />
chers’ A so<br />
www.esta-uk.org<br />
Creationism and<br />
Evolution:<br />
Questions in the<br />
Cla sr om<br />
Institute of Biology<br />
Chemistry on the<br />
High Str et<br />
Peter Ke ne t<br />
<strong>Earth</strong> <strong>Science</strong><br />
Activities and<br />
Demonstrations:<br />
Fo sils and Time<br />
Mike Tuke<br />
Beyond Petroleum:<br />
Busine s and<br />
The Environment in<br />
the 21st Century John<br />
Using Foam Ru ber in<br />
an Aquarium To<br />
Simulate Plate-<br />
Tectonic And Glacial<br />
Phenomena<br />
John Wheeler<br />
Dorset and East<br />
Devon Coast:<br />
World Heritage Site<br />
ESTA Conference<br />
Update<br />
New ESTA Members<br />
News and Resources<br />
(including ESTA AGM)<br />
planktonic graptoloids, and the habitats<br />
in which they, and the sessile dendroids,<br />
lived. I was interested to see that the<br />
many branched form Cyrtograptus (c on<br />
the diagram) is shown as living at abyssal<br />
depths. However, this would mean that<br />
most specimens would have come from<br />
rocks interpreted as being oceanic: in<br />
contrast many specimens come from<br />
rocks which accumulated not on oceanic<br />
crust, but on deeper areas within shelves<br />
(such as the area around Builth Wells, in<br />
Wales). It is still likely, though, that they<br />
lived within deeper water than the<br />
majority of other graptoloids.<br />
A dramatic diagram shows the history<br />
of graptolites, relating their diversity to<br />
global events. This, together with the<br />
text, also illustrates the enormous<br />
potential that the graptoloids have as<br />
global timekeepers, with a pinpoint<br />
accuracy of only a few hundred thousand<br />
years. Finally, a panel of “Graptolites<br />
tales” deals with sex (all we can say is<br />
that they probably did it); Charles<br />
Lapworth; graptolites and roofing slates<br />
(they can only rarely be found on your<br />
roof); and what ate them (there is a<br />
specimen of a crumpled-up graptolite<br />
that may have been eaten: but we don’t<br />
know who did). Two cartoons illustrate<br />
this panel, as well as photographs.<br />
As with the other publications in this<br />
series, Graptolites tells a long story in<br />
simple terms, with the aid of good<br />
graphics. A surprising amount of detail is<br />
given, which bears comparison with<br />
coverage in the more basic textbooks.<br />
Furthermore, it is better presented, and<br />
also more up to date. It should certainly<br />
be on the shelves alongside more<br />
conventional texts, and students’<br />
attention should be drawn to it.<br />
Denis Bates<br />
University of Wales,<br />
Aberystwyth<br />
www.esta-uk.org<br />
98
TEACHING EARTH SCIENCES ● Volume 27 ● Number 3, 2002<br />
Websearch<br />
Walking with Beasts<br />
Discovery Channel has launched a Walking with Beasts site,<br />
which provides an opportunity to compare the approaches adopted<br />
by the leading TV science channels in the US and the UK.<br />
http://dsc.discovery.com/convergence/beasts/beasts.html<br />
The BBC site is<br />
www.bbc.co.uk/beasts<br />
Coastal Environments<br />
Coastline 2000<br />
www.angliacampus.com/public/sec/geog/coastln/page02.php<br />
Schemes of work<br />
www.learn.co.uki/gleaming/secondary/topical/ks3/<br />
coastalerosion/teachers/htm<br />
www.angliacampus.com/tour/sec/geog/coastal/index.htm<br />
Case study, Holderness coast<br />
www.bennett.karoo.net/topics/coasts/html<br />
Case study, Reculver<br />
www.users.globalnet.co.uk/~drayner/recintro.htm<br />
Case study, Droskyn Point, Perranporth, Cornwall<br />
cil-www.oce.orst.edu:8080/pporth.html<br />
All along the coastline<br />
www.theukcoastalzone.com/regional.asp<br />
National Geographic News: Archaeology & Paleontology<br />
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/archaeology.html<br />
Palaeontology in the News<br />
http://www-geology.ucdavis.edu/~GEL3/paleonews.html<br />
The Geological Society of America has re-posted its 1999 Geological<br />
Time Scale at<br />
geosociety.org/science/timescale/timescl.pdf<br />
It can be printed from that site.<br />
Glaciers and Ice<br />
Monitoring Glacier Changes from Space<br />
sdcd.gsfc.nasa.gov/GLACIER.BAY/hall.science.txt.html<br />
Glacier and Ice Sheet Research Group<br />
glacier.lowtem.hokudai.ac.jp/index-e.htm<br />
Glaciological research<br />
www.maths.ox.ac.uk/~fowler/research/glaciology.html<br />
Glaciers and Glaciations - Ice Sheets and Glacial Lakes<br />
vulcan.wr.usgs.gov/Glossary/Glaciers/framework.html<br />
Landscape Evolution<br />
CRC LEME:<br />
Cooperative Research Center for Landscape Evolution and Mineral<br />
Exploration<br />
leme.anu.edu.au/<br />
Numerical Models Of Landscape Evolution<br />
adder.ocean.dal.ca/philippe/LEM_Numerical_models.html<br />
Modeling Landscape Evolution<br />
erode.evsc.virginia.edu/frlect/introduction/index.html<br />
Oceans<br />
FEMA Fact Sheet: Hurricanes<br />
www.fema.gov/fema/hurricaf.html<br />
Ocean Planet<br />
seawifs.gsfc.nasa.gov/ocean-planet.html<br />
USGS Center for Coastal Geology<br />
stimpy.er.usgs.gov/<br />
USGS Marine and Coastal Geology Program<br />
marine.usgs.gov/<br />
USGS Woods Hole Field Center<br />
woodshole.er.usgs.gov/<br />
NOAA VENTS Program<br />
www.pmel.noaa.gov/vents/home.html<br />
Exploration of Mid-Ocean Ridges<br />
www.nerc.ac.uk/BRIDGE/<br />
<strong>Earth</strong>quakes<br />
National <strong>Earth</strong>quake Information Center<br />
wwwneic.cr.usgs.gov/<br />
Caltech Seismological Laboratory<br />
www.gps.caltech.edu/seismo/seismo.page.html<br />
Tsunami<br />
www.geophys.washington.edu/tsunami/intro.html<br />
Seismology and <strong>Earth</strong>quake Information<br />
www.geophys.washington.edu/SEIS/welcome.html<br />
USGS: Latest <strong>Earth</strong>quake Information<br />
quake.wr.usgs.gov/QUAKES/CURRENT/index.html<br />
San Francisco Bay Area <strong>Earth</strong>quake Map<br />
quake.wr.usgs.gov/recenteqs/Maps/SF_Bay.html<br />
99 www.esta-uk.org
Journal of the EARTH SCIENCE TEACHERS’ ASSOCIATION<br />
Volume 26 ● Number 4, 2001 ● ISSN 0957-8005<br />
Your President<br />
Introduced<br />
Martin Whiteley<br />
Thinking Ski ls in<br />
Geology Teaching<br />
Recovering the<br />
Leaning Tower of Pisa<br />
<strong>Earth</strong> <strong>Science</strong><br />
Activities and<br />
Demonstrations:<br />
<strong>Earth</strong>quakes<br />
Response to the<br />
House of Commons<br />
<strong>Science</strong> and<br />
Technology Commi t e<br />
14 - 19 year olds<br />
Se ting up a local<br />
group - West Wales<br />
Geology Teachers’<br />
Network<br />
Highlights from the<br />
post-16 ‘bring and<br />
share’ se sion a the<br />
ESTA Conference,<br />
Kingston 2001<br />
ESTA Conference<br />
update<br />
Book Reviews<br />
Websearch<br />
News and Resources<br />
rth <strong>Science</strong><br />
ache<br />
www.esta-uk.org<br />
rth <strong>Science</strong><br />
achers’ Assoc<br />
www.esta-uk.org<br />
Questions in the<br />
Cla sroom<br />
Institute of Biology<br />
Chemistry on the<br />
High Street<br />
Peter Kenne t<br />
<strong>Earth</strong> <strong>Science</strong><br />
Activities and<br />
Demonstrations:<br />
Fo sils and Time<br />
Browne<br />
Simulate Plate-<br />
Tectonic And Glacial<br />
Phenomena<br />
John Wheeler<br />
Dorset and East<br />
Devon Coast:<br />
World Heritage Site<br />
ESTA Conference<br />
Update<br />
New ESTA Members<br />
Websearch<br />
News and Resources<br />
(including ESTA AGM)<br />
TEACHING EARTH SCIENCES ● Volume 27 ● Number 3, 2002<br />
Websearch<br />
<strong>Earth</strong>’s Interior<br />
<strong>Earth</strong>’s Interior<br />
www.seismo.unr.edu/ftp/pub/louie/class/100/interior.html<br />
<strong>Earth</strong>’s Interior & Plate Tectonics<br />
www.solarviews.com/eng/earthint.htm<br />
<strong>Earth</strong>’s Interior<br />
www.seismo.unr.edu/ftp/pub/louie/class/100/interior.html<br />
Plate Tectonics<br />
NGDC Marine Geology and Geophysics Division<br />
www.ngdc.noaa.gov/mgg/mggd.html<br />
Ocean Drilling Program<br />
www-odp.tamu.edu/<br />
Plate Motion Calculator<br />
manbow.ori.u-tokyo.ac.jp/tamaki-html/plate_motion.html<br />
Plate Tectonics<br />
volcano.und.nodak.edu/vwdocs/msh/ov/ovpt/ovpt.html<br />
Structure and Tectonics Groups on the WWW<br />
craton.geol.brocku.ca/guest/jurgen/SITES.HTM<br />
Caribbean Geology & Tectonics Website<br />
www.fiu.edu/orgs/caribgeol<br />
Welcome to the World Stress Map (WSM)<br />
www-wsm.physik.uni-karlsruhe.de<br />
Plate Tectonics: History of an Idea<br />
Plate Tectonics<br />
www.ucmp.berkeley.edu/geology/techist.html<br />
This Dynamic <strong>Earth</strong> (USGS)<br />
pubs-usgs-gov/publications/text/dynamic.html<br />
Plate Tectonics: A whole new way of looking at your planet<br />
www.platetectonics.com/index.html<br />
Plate Tectonic Reconstructions at UTIG<br />
www.ig.utexas.edu/research/projects/plates/plates.html<br />
The Active Tectonics Web Server<br />
www.muohio.edu/tectonics/ActiveTectonics.html<br />
<strong>Earth</strong> Systems, Impacts<br />
Climate Processes over the Oceans<br />
eos.atmos.washington.edu/<br />
Comet Observation Home Page<br />
encke.jpl.nasa.gov<br />
Climate Change<br />
www.ucsusa.org/globalwarming/index.html<br />
U.S. Census Bureau<br />
www.census.gov/<br />
New Posting Retiring Stay in touch with<br />
Teaching <strong>Earth</strong> <strong>Science</strong>s News and Activities<br />
Subscribe to<br />
Teaching <strong>Earth</strong> <strong>Science</strong>s<br />
Subscription rates<br />
Full membership<br />
Student and retired membership<br />
£25.00 to UK addresses £12.50 to UK addresses<br />
Subscriber Details<br />
TITLE<br />
NAME<br />
<strong>teaching</strong><br />
EARTH<br />
SCIENCES<br />
Thinking Geology:<br />
Activities to Develop<br />
<strong>teaching</strong><br />
EARTH<br />
SCIENCES<br />
Creationism and<br />
Evolution:<br />
ADDRESS<br />
inquiry into the<br />
<strong>Science</strong> Cu riculum for<br />
Mike Tuke<br />
Beyond Petroleum:<br />
Busine s and<br />
The Environment in<br />
the 21st Century John<br />
Using Foam Rubber in<br />
an Aquarium To<br />
Journal of the EARTH SCIENCE TEACHERS’ ASSOCIATION<br />
Volume 27 ● Number 1, 2002 ● ISSN 0957-8005<br />
TOWN/CITY<br />
COUNTRY<br />
E-MAIL ADDRESS<br />
POST CODE/ZIP<br />
Membership Secretary:<br />
Owain Thomas<br />
PO Box 10, Narberth<br />
Pembrokeshire SA67 7YE<br />
Teaching <strong>Earth</strong> <strong>Science</strong>s - serving the <strong>Earth</strong> <strong>Science</strong> Education Community<br />
www.esta-uk.org<br />
100
TEACHING EARTH SCIENCES ● Volume 27 ● Number 3, 2002<br />
News and Resources<br />
Mineral Collecting and Conservation:<br />
Hammering Out a Future<br />
A one day conference to be held at the<br />
Harold Riley Suite, University of Salford,<br />
Wednesday 16th April 2003, 10:00 to 16:30<br />
Mineral collecting is scientifically and<br />
educationally important and a hobby enjoyed by<br />
many. However, many mineral sites are finite and the<br />
issue of sustainable collecting on mineral sites is<br />
becoming increasingly important. Collecting is<br />
fundamental to mineralogical research, and for<br />
educational, commercial and aesthetic purposes, but<br />
indiscriminate activity can deplete or destroy a<br />
mineralogical site. This conference aims to discuss the<br />
different aspects of mineral collecting and the best<br />
way of conserving the available mineral resource for<br />
future use by all interest groups.<br />
This meeting aims to open a debate rather than<br />
attempt to reach solutions and provides an<br />
opportunity to share views and identify and discuss<br />
issues. Speakers have been chosen to reflect a full<br />
range of views on the issues surrounding mineral<br />
collecting and include; the statutory conservation<br />
bodies; professional, hobbyist and academic research<br />
collectors; museums; landowners; and industrial<br />
archaeologists. The conference will conclude with an<br />
open debate and it is hoped that stimulating<br />
discussion will follow.<br />
The meeting will be co-convened by English<br />
Nature, the Geological Society’s Geoconservation<br />
Commission and the Russell Society. The conference<br />
proceedings will be published by English Nature and<br />
will be available shortly after the conference.<br />
Delegates will also have a chance to express their own<br />
views on mineral collecting and conservation in the<br />
form of written statements, which will be included<br />
with the proceedings volume and collected on the day<br />
of the conference.<br />
Further information from:<br />
Jennifer Yau,<br />
Environmental Impacts Team,<br />
English Nature, Northminster House,<br />
Peterborough, UK PE11UA<br />
(01733 455504).<br />
Do You Use Geological Sites – Have Your Say<br />
We need your help so that we can help you. Many readers of<br />
Teaching <strong>Earth</strong> <strong>Science</strong>s use geological and geomorphological<br />
sites as a <strong>teaching</strong> resource – these might include National Nature<br />
reserves (NNRs), Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSIs), Regional<br />
Important Geological/Geomorphological Sites (RIGS), show caves,<br />
country parks, coastal, river and other natural sections, pits and<br />
quarries.<br />
If this includes you or your school or you manage such a site for<br />
visits by school groups, then read on.<br />
The National Stone Centre (NSC) has been asked by English<br />
Nature to examine particularly the opportunities presented by the<br />
National Curriculum for using geological sites. The brief also includes<br />
a review of the use of geological sites for <strong>teaching</strong> <strong>Earth</strong> science and by<br />
schools in general. The NSC is working closely with ESTA members<br />
on this scheme. The time allowed for the project is very limited indeed<br />
and so will only enable a scoping study to be carried out.<br />
So we need as much help as you can give us.<br />
Please let the NSC know which sites you use and how you use<br />
them – with what groups – for what purpose – what curriculum area<br />
and how often Do you use background material published by others<br />
or produce you own customised material Do you experience access<br />
problems to sites Ideally would you like to use geological sites more<br />
frequently If so, what factors constrain use – cost, timetabling, staff<br />
cover, insurance cover, distance, curriculum/specification limitations<br />
If you wish we can e-mail these questions to you so that you can<br />
respond by e-mail (see below).<br />
The exercise may be a first step in helping English Nature to work<br />
more closely with schools – to help you to use geological and<br />
geomorphological sites. So your comments could have a positive<br />
payback for you in time. If you can help, please respond, if possible<br />
before 23 December 2002 to ian@nationalstonecentre.org.uk<br />
Ian Thomas<br />
Director, National Stone Centre<br />
Porter Lane, Wirksworth, Derbyshire DE4 4LS<br />
Tel + Fax: 01629 824833<br />
GeoSciEd IV, Calgary, Canada, August 10-14, 2003<br />
Details of this international conference are shown on the separate<br />
advertisement (p.102) and much more information is available on the<br />
highly-informative and regularly-updated website, www.geoscied.org. The<br />
objective of the meeting is to support colleagues across the world who are<br />
involved in <strong>Earth</strong> science education from elementary to university/college<br />
levels and beyond, through a variety of presentations, workshops and field<br />
visits. There will be opportunities to share expertise and experiences, for<br />
personal development and for networking with other geoscience educators<br />
from around the world. We do hope that ESTA and other readers of TES<br />
will be able to attend the meeting and to contribute as well. The Calgary<br />
Organising Committee hopes to support a limited number of attendees<br />
from Developing Countries. Consult the web site for further details.<br />
CK & RDT<br />
101 www.esta-uk.org
GeoSci advert<br />
to be dropped in by printers<br />
www.esta-uk.org<br />
102
THEMATIC TRAILS<br />
GEOLOGY AND THE BUILDINGS OF OXFORD Paul Jenkins<br />
A walk through the city of Oxford is likened to visiting an<br />
open-air museum. Attention is drawn to the variety of<br />
building materials both ancient and modern, used in the<br />
fabric of the city. Discussion of their suitability, durability,<br />
susceptibility to pollution and weathering, maintenance<br />
and periodic replacement is raised.<br />
44 pages, 22 illustrations, ISBN 0 948444 09 6 Thematic<br />
Trails (1988) £2.40<br />
GEOLOGY AT HARTLAND QUAY Chris Cornford & Alan Childs<br />
In a short cliff-foot walk along the beach at Hartland<br />
Quay, visitors are provided with a straightforward<br />
explanation of the local rocks and their history.<br />
Alternative pages provide a deeper commentary on<br />
aspects of the geology and in particular provides<br />
reference notes for examining the variety of structures<br />
exhibited in this dramatic location.<br />
40 pages, 47 illustrations, ISBN 0 948444 12 6 Thematic<br />
Trails (1989) £2.40<br />
THE CLIFFS OF HARTLAND QUAY Peter Keene<br />
Interpreting the shapes of coastal landforms is introduced<br />
as a method of understanding something of the<br />
environmental history of this dramatic coastal landscape.<br />
A short walk following the coastal path to the south of<br />
Hartland Quay puts this strategy into practice.<br />
40 pages, 24 illustrations, ISBN 0 948444 05 3<br />
Thematic Trails (1990) £2.40<br />
STRAWBERRY WATER TO MARSLAND MOUTH Peter Keene<br />
A short cliff-top walk between the small but spectacular<br />
coastal coombes of Welcome Mouth and Marsland<br />
explains what beaches, streams and valley sides can<br />
tell us of the history of this coastal landscape. 40<br />
pages, 24 illustrations, ISBN 0 948444 06 1<br />
Thematic Trails (1990) £2.40<br />
VALLEY OF ROCKS; LYNTON Peter Keene & Brian Pearce<br />
The drama of the valley is explored both by offering<br />
explanation for the spectacular scenery and by recalling<br />
its theatrical setting as seen through the eyes of those<br />
who have visited the valley in the past.<br />
44 pages, 35 illustrations, ISBN 0 948444 25 8<br />
Thematic Trails (1990) £2.40<br />
THE CLIFFS OF SAUNTON Peter Keene & Chris Cornford<br />
I n a short cliff-foot walk along the beach at Saunton,<br />
visitors are provided with an explanation for the local rocks<br />
that make up the cliff and the shore. Alternative pages<br />
provide a deeper commentary on aspects of the geology<br />
and a chance on the return walk to reconstruct the more<br />
recent history of this coast by a practical examination of the<br />
cliff face. 44 pages, 30 illustrations, ISBN 0 948444 24 X<br />
Thematic Trails (May 1993) £2.40<br />
INTERPRETING PLEISTOCENE DEPOSITS Peter Keene<br />
A field interpretation guide for beginners. A simple<br />
<strong>teaching</strong> model using an adapted graphic log sheet. Of<br />
wide general educational application, but designed for<br />
use with the following trails: ‘Westward Ho! Coastal<br />
Landscape Trail’, ‘Valley of Rocks, Lynton’, ‘The Cliffs of<br />
Saunton’, ‘Strawberry Water to Marsland Mouth’, ‘Prawle<br />
Peninsula Landscape Trail’ and ‘Burrator Dartmoor<br />
Landform Trail’ 10 pages, 10 illustrations<br />
Thematic Trails (1993 edition) £2.40<br />
MENDIPS New Sites for Old;<br />
a student’s guide to the geology of the east Mendips. This<br />
guide gives a detailed description of 39 safe, accessible<br />
sites chosen for their educational potential.<br />
192 pages, 46 illustrations,<br />
ISBN 086139 319 8 (NCC 1985) £2.50<br />
MALVERN HILLS; a student’s guide to the geology of the<br />
Malverns. D. W. Bullard (1989)<br />
The booklet includes detailed description of 21 geological<br />
sites of interest in the area.<br />
73 pages, 31 illustrations,<br />
ISBN 086139 548 4 (NCC) £2.25<br />
WENLOCK EDGE; geology <strong>teaching</strong> trail M. J. Harley (1988)<br />
Six sites suitable for educational fieldwork are described<br />
and suitable exercises outlined.<br />
22 pages, 15 illustrations,<br />
ISBN 086139 403 8 (NCC) £1.50<br />
BURRATOR, DARTMOOR LANDFORM TRAIL Peter Keene & Mike<br />
Harley (1987)<br />
An interactive circular 6 mile walk exploring the evolution<br />
of tor and valley scenery on Dartmoor.<br />
21 pages, 12 illustrations,<br />
ISBN 086139 385 6 (NCC) £1.50<br />
THE ICE AGE IN CWM IDWAL<br />
The Ice Age invested Cwm Idwal with a landscape whose<br />
combination of glaciological, geological and floristic<br />
elements is unsurpassed in mountain Britain. Cwm Idwal<br />
is readily accessible on good paths within a few minutes<br />
walk of the modern A5 route through Snowdonia.<br />
22 pages, 16 illustrations,<br />
ISBN 0 9511175 4 8<br />
Addison Landscape Publications (1988) £3.00<br />
THE ICE AGE IN Y GLYDERAU AND NANT FFRANCON<br />
Ice in the last main glaciation in Wales carved the glacial<br />
highway of Nant Ffrancon through the heart of Snowdonia<br />
so boldly as to ensure its place amongst the best known<br />
natural landmarks in Britain. The phenomena is explained<br />
in a way that is attractive to both specialist and visitor<br />
alike. 30 pages, 20 illustrations,<br />
ISBN 0 9511175 3 X<br />
Addison Landscape Publications (1988) £3.00<br />
LONDON. ILLUSTRATED GEOLOGICAL WALKS.<br />
BOOK 1 (The City)<br />
Adds to the well-known Pevsner accounts of the buildings<br />
of the City of London by offering comment upon the rock<br />
types used in familiar City streets. Maps set out the route<br />
clearly. No previous knowledge of geology is assumed. 98<br />
pages, 98 photographs, 14 maps,<br />
ISBN 0 7073 0350 8<br />
Geologists’ <strong>Association</strong> (1984) £4.95<br />
LONDON. ILLUSTRATED GEOLOGICAL WALKS.<br />
BOOK 2 (The West End)<br />
A wide range of exotic rock types are found in the shop<br />
fronts of Piccadilly, Tottenham Court Road and the office<br />
blocks of Central London. Again no previous knowledge of<br />
geology is assumed.<br />
142 pages, 128 photos, 16 maps,<br />
ISBN 0 7073 0416 4<br />
Geologists’ <strong>Association</strong> (1985) £4.95<br />
Some earlier items are still available - please enquire<br />
ORDERS TO: Dave Williams, Corner Cottage, School Lane, Hartwell, Northampton, NN7 2HL E-mail: earthscience@macunlimited.net<br />
Official orders will be invoiced. Cheques and postal orders should be made payable to ESTA. Order forms avaliable from the ESTA Website<br />
103 www.esta-uk.org
Key Stage 3<br />
<strong>Science</strong> of the <strong>Earth</strong> 11-14 Units have been devised to introduce <strong>Earth</strong> <strong>Science</strong> to pupils at Key<br />
Stage 3 level as part of their National Curriculum studies in <strong>Science</strong> and Geography.<br />
Each Unit occupies about one double period of <strong>teaching</strong> time and the Units are sold as 3-Unit<br />
packs. Units that are available now are:-<br />
GW: Groundwork - Introducing <strong>Earth</strong> <strong>Science</strong><br />
GW1 - Found in the Ground<br />
GW2 - Be a Mineral Expert<br />
GW3 - Be a Rock Detective<br />
LP: Life from the Past - Introducing Fossils<br />
LP1 - Remains to be seen<br />
LP2 - A well-preserved specimen<br />
LP3 - A fate worse than death - fossilization!<br />
ME: Moulding <strong>Earth</strong>’s Surface - Weathering, Erosion<br />
and Transportation<br />
ME1 - Breaking up rocks<br />
ME2 - Rain, rain and rain again<br />
ME3 - Landshaping<br />
PP: Power from the past: coal (a full colour poster is<br />
available with this Unit for a p & p charge of<br />
£1.15 (inc. VAT) please indicate if you do not<br />
require this.<br />
PP1 - Coal swamp<br />
PP2 - Layers and seams<br />
PP3 - ‘Unspoiling’ the countryside<br />
HC: Hidden changes in the <strong>Earth</strong>: introduction to<br />
metamorphism<br />
HC1 - Overheated<br />
HC2 - Under Pressure<br />
HC3 - Under Heat and Pressure<br />
M: Magma - introducing igneous processes<br />
M1 - Lava in the lab.<br />
M2 - Lava landscapes<br />
M3 - Crystallising magma<br />
SR: Secondhand rocks: Introducing sedimentary<br />
processes<br />
SR1 - In the stream<br />
SR2 - Blowing hot and cold<br />
SR3 - Sediment to rock, rock to sediment<br />
BM: Bulk constructional minerals<br />
BM1 - What is our town made of<br />
BM2 - From source to site<br />
BM3 - Dig it - or not<br />
FW: Steps towards the rock face - introducing<br />
fieldwork<br />
FW1 - Thinking it through<br />
FW2 - Rocks from the big screen<br />
FW3 - Rock trail<br />
ES: <strong>Earth</strong>’s surface features<br />
ES1 - Patterns on the <strong>Earth</strong><br />
ES2 - Is the <strong>Earth</strong> cracking up<br />
ES3 - <strong>Earth</strong>’s moving surface<br />
E: Power source: oil and energy<br />
E1 - Crisis in Kiama - which energy source now<br />
E2 - Black gold - oil from the depths<br />
E3 - Trap - oil and gas caught underground<br />
WG: Water overground and underground<br />
WG1 - Oasis on a desert island-the permeability<br />
problem<br />
WG2 - Out of sight, out of mind - waste disposal<br />
and ground water pollution<br />
WG3 - The dam that failed<br />
SPECIAL REDUCED PRICE<br />
£2.00 each (post free)<br />
for Key Stage 3<br />
A Teachers’ Guide to the<br />
‘<strong>Science</strong> of the <strong>Earth</strong>’ Approach - £1.00<br />
Key Stage 4<br />
SoE1: Changes to the atmosphere<br />
SoE2: Geological Changes - <strong>Earth</strong>’s Structure and Plate Tectonics<br />
SoE3: Geological Changes - Rock Formation and Deformation<br />
Investigating the <strong>Science</strong> of the <strong>Earth</strong>. Practical and investigative activities for Key Stage 4 and beyond.<br />
Price £2.95(Per Unit)<br />
ROUTEWAY – solving planning and technical problems of building a major road. A three-unit pack dealing with aspects<br />
of planning and engineering geology and associated environmental problems. <strong>Science</strong> and<br />
Geography courses at Key Stage 4. Also applicable to problem-solving modules in ‘A’ level or Vocational <strong>Science</strong> or<br />
Geology courses.<br />
Price: £4.95<br />
Please note - to claim ESTA member prices on the above items, you must enclose a copy of this<br />
advertisement or an ESTA order form, or simply mention your ESTA membership.<br />
ORDERS TO: Dave Williams, Corner Cottage, School Lane, Hartwell, Northampton, NN7 2HL E-mail: earthscience@macunlimited.net<br />
Official orders will be invoiced. Cheques and postal orders should be made payable to ESTA. Order forms avaliable from the ESTA Website<br />
www.esta-uk.org<br />
104
GRAIN SIZE SCALE<br />
Laminated cards specially printed for ESTA<br />
(6 x 9 cm credit card size). They show grains<br />
from coarse sand down to silt.<br />
30p each<br />
20p each for 20 to 99 copies<br />
100 copies or more £15<br />
1000 copies £100<br />
WORKING WITH ROCKS PACK:<br />
Folder of Teacher notes and worksheets; Christina’s Story<br />
- tale of a marble headstone; 16 postcards of building<br />
stones - for town and graveyard trails.<br />
KS1/2/3. £7.00<br />
ROCK, MINERAL & FOSSIL KITS<br />
1. ESTA MINERAL SAMPLES<br />
Boxed set of ten minerals (haematite, magnetite,<br />
galena, pyrite, mica, gypsum, calcite, halite, quartz &<br />
feldspar), plus steel nail, copper coin, streak plate,<br />
dropper botter & magnifier. Essential for use with<br />
activities in PEST 9 - MINERALS (copy included).<br />
Suitable for KS2/KS3. £15.00<br />
2. DIVERSITY OF LIFE - FOSSIL REPLICAS SET<br />
Boxed fossil replicas, selected to illustrate the<br />
diversity of life over geological time (dinosaur tooth,<br />
trilobite, ammonite, shark tooth, icthyosaur tooth,<br />
fish, sea urchin, coral, reptile footprint, seed fern, sea<br />
lily & shrimp).<br />
Produced by GEOU (Open University Dept of <strong>Earth</strong><br />
<strong>Science</strong>s) & includes detailed notes and a copy of<br />
PEST 1 - FOSSILS.<br />
Suitable for KS2/KS3/KS4. £16.00<br />
3. ESTA ROCK KITS - ask for details<br />
POSTCARDS<br />
1. THE FLOOR OF THE OCEANS<br />
(14 x 9cm) miniature version of wall map.<br />
25p each, 10 or more 20p each.<br />
2. BUILDING STONES<br />
A set of 16 postcards depicting building or<br />
ornamental stones to be found in towns and cities<br />
throughout the country.<br />
All at natural size. £3.50.<br />
MAPS AND WALLCHARTS<br />
1. GEOTHERMAL MAP OF THE UNITED KINGDOM<br />
Published by BGS<br />
This coloured chart consists of a map (scale<br />
1:1,500,000) showing the geothermal potential of the<br />
UK along with annotations describing the major sites<br />
and projects. Size approx. 80 x 80 cm.<br />
£4.00 per folded map<br />
2. THE FLOOR OF THE OCEAN<br />
published by Marie Tharp<br />
Useful for 11-14 Unit - <strong>Earth</strong>’s surface features.<br />
Specially imported by ESTA from the USA. Printed on<br />
laminated paper, a superb map showing the relief<br />
featues of the ocean floor in graphic detail.<br />
£14.00 per rolled map<br />
3. LE PUYS VOLCANOES (AUVERGNE)<br />
Published by the French Bureau of Geology and Mines<br />
and the Auvergne Volcanoes Regional Park. Useful for<br />
11- 14 unit - Magma.<br />
A folded geological map of the region at 1: 25,000<br />
scale colourfully illustrates the volcanic sites - £9.00<br />
An accompanying sheet of 16 postcards has been cut<br />
into 4-A4 sized sheets for easier mailing - £5.00<br />
Set of maps and photos - £13.00<br />
4. GEOLOGICAL MAP OF THE WORLD<br />
Published by OU/ESSO with help from ESTA.<br />
Including oceanic crust colour coded by age,<br />
beautiful! 100cm x 150 cm. Price £8.00.<br />
5. TARR’S WORLD SEISMICITY MAP<br />
(return of an old favourite). This large map (120cm x<br />
90cm) shows a distribution of the world’s major<br />
earthquakes - shallow, medium and deep focus.<br />
Magnitudes and dates are given for many. £5.00<br />
6. U.K. GEOLOGY WALL MAP<br />
One of Ordnance Survey series for KS2/3, published<br />
with help from ESTA.<br />
£4.00 paper, £12.00 laminated.<br />
Some earlier items are still available - please enquire<br />
ORDERS TO: Dave Williams, Corner Cottage, School Lane, Hartwell, Northampton, NN7 2HL E-mail: earthscience@macunlimited.net<br />
Official orders will be invoiced. Cheques and postal orders should be made payable to ESTA. Order forms avaliable from the ESTA Website<br />
N.B. All items are posted free of charge.<br />
105 www.esta-uk.org