18.01.2015 Views

teaching - Earth Science Teachers' Association

teaching - Earth Science Teachers' Association

teaching - Earth Science Teachers' Association

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Transform your PDFs into Flipbooks and boost your revenue!

Leverage SEO-optimized Flipbooks, powerful backlinks, and multimedia content to professionally showcase your products and significantly increase your reach.

<strong>teaching</strong><br />

EARTH<br />

SCIENCES<br />

Journal of the EARTH SCIENCE TEACHERS’ ASSOCIATION<br />

Volume 27 ● Number 3, 2002 ● ISSN 0957-8005<br />

www.esta-uk.org


th <strong>Science</strong><br />

ache<br />

<strong>Earth</strong> <strong>Science</strong><br />

Activities and<br />

<strong>Earth</strong>quakes<br />

Response to the<br />

<strong>Science</strong> and<br />

inquiry into the<br />

Kingston 2001<br />

Book Reviews<br />

Websearch<br />

Browne<br />

Teaching <strong>Earth</strong> <strong>Science</strong>s: Guide for Authors<br />

The Editor welcomes articles of any length and nature and on any topic related to<br />

<strong>Earth</strong> science education from cradle to grave. Please inspect back copies of TES,<br />

from Issue 26(3) onwards, to become familiar with the journal house-style.<br />

Three paper copies of major articles are requested. Please use double line spacing<br />

and A4 paper and please use SI units throughout, except where this is inappropriate<br />

(in which case please include a conversion table). The first paragraph of each<br />

major article should not have a subheading but should either introduce the reader<br />

to the context of the article or should provide an overview to stimulate interest. This<br />

is not an abstract in the formal sense. Subsequent paragraphs should be grouped<br />

under sub-headings.<br />

Text<br />

Please also supply the full text on disk or as an email attachment: Microsoft Word<br />

is the most convenient, but any widely-used wordprocessor is acceptable.<br />

References<br />

Please use the following examples as models<br />

(1) Articles<br />

Mayer, V. (1995) Using the <strong>Earth</strong> system for integrating the science curriculum.<br />

<strong>Science</strong> Education, 79(4), pp. 375-391.<br />

(2) Books<br />

McPhee, J. (1986 ) Rising from the Plains. New York: Fraux, Giroux & Strauss.<br />

(3) Chapters in books<br />

Duschl, R.A. & Smith, M.J. (2001) <strong>Earth</strong> <strong>Science</strong>. In Jere Brophy (ed), Subject-<br />

Specific Instructional Methods and Activities, Advances in Research on Teaching. Volume 8,<br />

pp. 269-290. Amsterdam: Elsevier <strong>Science</strong>.<br />

To Advertise in<br />

<strong>teaching</strong><br />

EARTH<br />

SCIENCES<br />

<strong>teaching</strong><br />

EARTH<br />

SCIENCES<br />

Journal of the EARTH SCIENCE TEACHERS’ ASSOCIATION<br />

Volume 26 ● Number 4, 2001 ● ISSN 0957-8005<br />

Your President<br />

Introduced<br />

Martin Whiteley<br />

Thinking Geology:<br />

Activities to Develop<br />

Thinking Ski ls in<br />

Geology Teaching<br />

Recovering the<br />

Leaning Tower of Pisa<br />

Demonstrations:<br />

House of Commons<br />

Technology Commi tee<br />

<strong>Science</strong> Cu riculum for<br />

14 - 19 year olds<br />

Se ting up a local<br />

group - West Wales<br />

Geology Teachers’<br />

Network<br />

Highlights from the<br />

post-16 ‘bring and<br />

share’ session a the<br />

ESTA Conference,<br />

ESTA Conference<br />

update<br />

News and Resources<br />

www.esta-uk.org<br />

Journal of the EARTH SCIENCE TEACHERS’ ASSOCIATION<br />

Volume 27 ● Number 1, 2002 ● ISSN 0957-8005<br />

Telephone<br />

Ian Ray<br />

0161 486 0326<br />

<strong>teaching</strong><br />

EARTH<br />

SCIENCES<br />

rth <strong>Science</strong><br />

chers’ Asso<br />

www.esta-uk.org<br />

Creationism and<br />

Evolution:<br />

Questions in the<br />

Classroom<br />

Institute of Biology<br />

Chemistry on the<br />

High Street<br />

Peter Kenne t<br />

<strong>Earth</strong> <strong>Science</strong><br />

Activities and<br />

Demonstrations:<br />

Fossils and Time<br />

Mike Tuke<br />

Beyond Petroleum:<br />

Business and<br />

The Environment in<br />

the 21st Century John<br />

Using Foam Rubber in<br />

an Aquarium To<br />

Simulate Plate-<br />

Tectonic And Glacial<br />

Phenomena<br />

John Wheeler<br />

Dorset and East<br />

Devon Coast:<br />

World Heritage Site<br />

ESTA Conference<br />

Update<br />

New ESTA Members<br />

Websearch<br />

News and Resources<br />

(including ESTA AGM)<br />

Figures<br />

Prepared artwork must be of high quality and submitted on paper and disk. Handdrawn<br />

and hand-labelled diagrams are not normally acceptable, although in some<br />

circumstances this is appropriate. Each figure must be submitted as a separate file.<br />

Photographs<br />

Please submit colour or black-and-white photographs as originals. They are also<br />

welcomed in digital form on disk or as email attachments: .jpeg format is to be preferred.<br />

Please use one file for each photograph.<br />

Copyright<br />

There are no copyright restrictions on original material published in Teaching <strong>Earth</strong><br />

<strong>Science</strong>s if it is required for use in the classroom or lecture room. Copyright material<br />

reproduced in TES by permission of other publications rests with the original<br />

publisher. Permission must be sought from the Editor to reproduce original material<br />

from Teaching <strong>Earth</strong> <strong>Science</strong>s in other publications and appropriate acknowledgement<br />

must be given.<br />

All articles submitted should be original unless indicted otherwise and should<br />

contain the author’s full name, title and address (and email address where relevant).<br />

They should be sent to the Editor,<br />

Dr Roger Trend<br />

School of Education<br />

University of Exeter<br />

Exeter EX1 2LU<br />

UK<br />

Tel 01392 264768<br />

Email R.D.Trend@exeter.ac.uk<br />

Editor<br />

WHERE IS PEST<br />

PEST is printed as the<br />

centre 4 pages in<br />

Teaching <strong>Earth</strong> <strong>Science</strong>s.


Journal of the EARTH SCIENCE TEACHERS’ ASSOCIATION<br />

Volume 27 ● Number 3, 2002 ● ISSN 0957-8005<br />

www.esta-uk.org<br />

TEACHING EARTH SCIENCES ● Volume 27 ● Number 3, 2002<br />

<strong>teaching</strong><br />

EARTH<br />

SCIENCES<br />

Teaching <strong>Earth</strong> <strong>Science</strong>s is published quarterly by<br />

the <strong>Earth</strong> <strong>Science</strong> Teachers’ <strong>Association</strong>. ESTA<br />

aims to encourage and support the <strong>teaching</strong> of<br />

<strong>Earth</strong> <strong>Science</strong>s, whether as a single subject or as<br />

part of science or geography courses.<br />

Full membership is £25.00; student and retired<br />

membership £12.50.<br />

Registered Charity No. 1005331<br />

Editor<br />

Dr. Roger Trend<br />

School of Education<br />

University of Exeter<br />

Exeter EX1 2LU<br />

Tel: 01392 264768<br />

Email: R.D.Trend@exeter.ac.uk<br />

Advertising<br />

Ian Ray<br />

5 Gathill Close<br />

Cheadle Hulme<br />

Cheadle<br />

Cheshire SK8 6SJ<br />

Tel: 0161 486 0326<br />

Reviews Editor<br />

Dr. Denis Bates<br />

Institute of Geography and <strong>Earth</strong> <strong>Science</strong>s<br />

University of Wales<br />

Aberystwyth<br />

Dyfed SY23 3DB<br />

Tel: 01970 622639<br />

Email: deb@aber.ac.uk<br />

Council Officers<br />

President<br />

Martin Whiteley<br />

Barrisdale Limited<br />

Bedford<br />

Chairman<br />

Geraint Owen<br />

Department of Geography<br />

University of Swansea<br />

Singleton Park<br />

Swansea SA2 8PP<br />

Secretary<br />

Dr. Dawn Windley<br />

Thomas Rotherham College<br />

Moorgate, Rotherham<br />

South Yorkshire<br />

Membership Secretary<br />

Owain Thomas<br />

PO Box 10, Narberth<br />

Pembrokeshire SA67 7YE<br />

Treasurer<br />

Geoff Hunter<br />

6 Harborne Road<br />

Tackley, Kidlington<br />

Oxon OX5 3BL<br />

Contributions to future issues of Teaching <strong>Earth</strong><br />

<strong>Science</strong>s will be welcomed and should be<br />

addressed to the Editor.<br />

Opinions and comments in this issue are the<br />

personal views of the authors and do not<br />

necessarily represent the views of the <strong>Association</strong>.<br />

Designed by Character Design<br />

Highridge, Wrigglebrook Lane, Kingsthorne<br />

Hereford HR2 8AW<br />

CONTENTS<br />

66 Editorial<br />

Roger Trend<br />

68 Hydrogeology, Pollution and Cemeteries<br />

Mike Lelliott<br />

74 Mass Extinctions:<br />

The Alternatives to “Deep Impact”<br />

Rosalind V. White<br />

78 Fossils Under the Microscope<br />

Ian Wilkinson<br />

85 The Stone Tapes:<br />

Building Stones in the History of the City of<br />

Nottingham<br />

Graham Lott<br />

89 Lost Worlds:<br />

How Exceptional Fossils Reveal the Past<br />

Mark Williams<br />

94 From Flood to Drought and Back Again<br />

Brian Waters<br />

96 ESTA Conference 2003<br />

97 Reviews<br />

98 ESTA Diary<br />

99 Websearch<br />

101 News and Resources<br />

<strong>teaching</strong><br />

EARTH<br />

SCIENCES<br />

Visit our website at www.esta-uk.org<br />

Front cover:<br />

Key Stage 2 children exploring the rock<br />

shelves, National Stone Centre. Note<br />

that hard hats are not required!<br />

Photo Ian Thomas. See page 101.<br />

Back cover:<br />

The snout of the Porito Moreno glacier<br />

and Lago Argentino in Patagonia,<br />

southern Argentina.<br />

Photo: Martin Whiteley<br />

65 www.esta-uk.org


TEACHING EARTH SCIENCES ● Volume 27 ● Number 3, 2002<br />

Editorial<br />

Afew weeks ago the BBC broadcast a peak-time<br />

television programme called something like<br />

“Fifty Places You Must Visit before You Die”,<br />

comprising the 50 most popular holiday locations<br />

according to some kind of viewer survey. Of course, I<br />

won’t bore or insult you by going through the usual<br />

caveats, (unrepresentative sample, inconsistent selection<br />

criteria etc.), but they are probably more relevant<br />

here than with most other data sources! Nevertheless,<br />

and remaining fully cognisant of the distinguishing<br />

characteristics of sound academic enquiry, I have on<br />

your behalf analysed the research data comprehensively,<br />

rigorously, statistically and exhaustively (not to mention<br />

exhaustingly). I have come up with some amazing<br />

facts that should cheer the hearts of those who seek<br />

after truth, including those committed to <strong>Earth</strong> science<br />

I had to determine if Iceland was ranked at 44<br />

because of its diverse and spectacular geological<br />

phenomena or because of its unique and equally<br />

spectacular socio-economic and cultural attractions.<br />

Similarly, what attracted respondents to Hawaii:<br />

the volcanoes or the surfing beaches<br />

education. There is, however, one major weakness in<br />

this academic investigation which might throw into<br />

question the reliability of the findings. This weakness is<br />

the fact that I, the objective and wholly impartial<br />

researcher engaged in this study, have been unsuccessful<br />

in my quest for research funds to allow me to investigate<br />

at first hand each and every location. This<br />

difficulty has prevented me from obtaining muchneeded<br />

supportive data to facilitate triangulation, and is,<br />

of course, a reflection of the very low esteem in which<br />

such high-quality, esoteric, academic research of this<br />

kind is generally held.<br />

Method<br />

The programme was watched, with a cup of coffee to<br />

hand, or was it tea Pencil and paper also figured in the<br />

data-collection instrument.<br />

Results and Analysis<br />

Taking the fifty locations in total, the Grand Canyon is<br />

top, the Great Barrier Reef is second, South Island<br />

New Zealand is fourth and Table Mountain is fifth. If<br />

you really want to know the third most popular location,<br />

please see the bottom of the next page where it is<br />

printed small and inverted. Needless to say, many of<br />

the world’s cities are in the list, such as Sydney at 8,<br />

New York at 9, Venice at 18 and Paris at 27. Specific<br />

buildings or historical settlements also figure large,<br />

such as the Taj Mahal at 10, Machu Picchu at 14,<br />

Angkor Wat at 29 and Abu Simbel at 48.<br />

Each location was painstakingly analysed to determine<br />

its relative <strong>Earth</strong> science content. This was a<br />

major element in the research project because it<br />

involved probing respondents’ minds in a systematic<br />

way in order to expose their perceptions of the places.<br />

This was particularly demanding because I had no<br />

access whatsoever to the respondents... For example, I<br />

had to determine if Iceland was ranked at 44 because<br />

of its diverse and spectacular geological phenomena or<br />

because of its unique and equally spectacular socioeconomic<br />

and cultural attractions. Similarly, what<br />

attracted respondents to Hawaii: the volcanoes or the<br />

surfing beaches<br />

For current readers the most significant “locale<br />

group” (a norm-referenced multi-variate artefact developed<br />

by my research team specifically for this project)<br />

comprises those places which are perceived as being<br />

attractive essentially because of their geological or geomorphological<br />

features: examples include Grand<br />

Canyon at 1, Great Barrier Reef at 2, South Island New<br />

Zealand at 4, Table Mountain at 5, Lake Louise at 11,<br />

Uluru at 12, Yosemite at 23, North Island New Zealand<br />

at 25, Alaska at 28, Everest at 30 and the Matterhorn at<br />

46. This group is labelled Downright Geological. A similar<br />

locale group (Diluted Geology) comprises places similar<br />

to these but with rather less domination by the<br />

geology: Galapagos at 33 (don’t forget all that biology:<br />

marine iguanas, finches, giant tortoises etc.) and Sri<br />

Lanka (think of all those non-geological elephants, trees<br />

and tea plantations) at 41 exemplify this category.<br />

Another important <strong>Earth</strong> science locale group comprises<br />

the Waterfalls, with no fewer than 4 on the list:<br />

Niagara at 15, Victoria at 21, Iguacu at 26 and Angel at<br />

47. A final <strong>Earth</strong> science grouping comprises historical<br />

or cultural places which possess significant geological<br />

elements, such as Petra at 16, Machu Picchu at 14, the<br />

Great Wall of China at 20 and the Terracotta Army at 45.<br />

This last group is labelled Building on Geology.<br />

The following table summarises the data according<br />

to locale group. Note that the four geology-related<br />

groups contain 31 places, being 62% of the total. This is<br />

more than half: an amazing and wholly-unexpected<br />

finding which has clear implications for curriculum<br />

Locale Group<br />

Frequency<br />

Urban Delights 13<br />

Downright Geological 13<br />

Building on Geology 10<br />

Tropical Paradise 5<br />

Waterfalls 4<br />

Diluted Geology 4<br />

Other (see bottom of next page) 1<br />

www.esta-uk.org<br />

66


TEACHING EARTH SCIENCES ● Volume 27 ● Number 3, 2002<br />

planning not only across the sciences but also in business<br />

& finance, travel, and leisure & tourism.<br />

The above analysis treats each rank as of equal value,<br />

but clearly a position of 3 is much better than one of 46.<br />

The mean rank of all the Downright Geological places<br />

(n=13) is 19.53 whereas that for Urban Delights<br />

(n=13) is far higher, at 26.84. This is unequivocal evidence<br />

that the world’s holiday-makers prefer visiting<br />

geological sites than drab and boring cities such as Sydney,<br />

Venice and Barcelona. Only the Other category has<br />

a higher rank than all of the geological categories, a<br />

wholly inexplicable and somewhat worrying finding.<br />

Implications of the Findings<br />

The implications of the results presented above are<br />

clearly very significant for the <strong>Earth</strong> science education<br />

community, and beyond, but it is not possible<br />

here to examine them at the length and depth warranted:<br />

such an analysis belongs in a high-status academic<br />

journal read by 12 very clever people<br />

worldwide rather than in TES which is read by many<br />

hundreds of practitioners. Nevertheless, some tentative<br />

conclusions are offered in all humility and the<br />

following ones might be drawn from this analysis. I<br />

present them as options to be considered.<br />

1. We can learn nothing whatsoever from these data: far<br />

more research is needed... and soon.<br />

2. <strong>Earth</strong> science figures large in the perceptions of people<br />

who both watch television and take overseas holidays.<br />

We have no reliable data on such perceptions<br />

among people who only engage in one of these two<br />

activities. These subjects do not actually think of<br />

themselves as being keen on geology, possibly<br />

because of its perceived connections with anoraks, so<br />

most are actually unaware of this <strong>Earth</strong> science orientation<br />

in their perceptions. However, if they were<br />

to become aware of it they would probably switch<br />

their holidays to Paris, Venice and Rome, with obvious<br />

implications for those places.<br />

3. <strong>Earth</strong> science teachers should take over responsibility<br />

for all courses in travel, leisure and tourism<br />

and the balance of content within such courses<br />

should be adjusted to match the expressed interests<br />

of the punters.<br />

4. Package tour operators should insist that all their<br />

representatives are <strong>Earth</strong> science graduates and their<br />

professional training within the tour company<br />

should involve refresher courses every year to ensure<br />

they are up-to-date (for example, do all current reps<br />

know if birds really are descendants of dinosaurs).<br />

5. Package tour representatives should be provided<br />

with scripts prepared by true experts in the field. An<br />

example follows: “Good afternoon, welcome to Majerife,<br />

and I hope you had a good flight from Gatwick. My name<br />

is Shelly and our coach driver today is Juan. We now have a<br />

50-minute drive to your hotel complex, so just sit back and<br />

relax. Make sure you go to the Welcome Meeting tomorrow<br />

morning at 6.15 a.m. where we will be telling you all about<br />

the local evidence for the Carnian-Norian extinction event,<br />

the latest interpretation of the ultramafic xenoliths in the<br />

alkali basalts which underlie the resort and, of course, the<br />

classic overstep shown in the unconformity in the hills behind<br />

your hotel. The meeting will finish by 3 p.m. so there will be<br />

plenty of time for a swim in the pool... Quick ,if you look out<br />

of the left side of the coach now you can see the quarry where<br />

the well-exposed ophiolite sequence gives us terrific evidence<br />

for the little-understood Tommotian collision...”<br />

6. Authorities keen to attract new tourists to particular<br />

locations should emphasise the geological features<br />

and ignore cultural and historical factors. It is even<br />

debatable if climatological and meteorological variables<br />

(often referred to in popular literature as “the<br />

weather”) should figure in their promotional material<br />

since the evidence presented here suggests it is<br />

totally irrelevant to the average holiday-maker<br />

(Everest, Iceland, Alaska).<br />

7. <strong>Earth</strong> science courses should be re-configured to<br />

accommodate these findings. This may be done in<br />

several ways. More full degree courses (or compulsory<br />

modules) are needed with titles such as “With<br />

Rocks In Mind: choosing your holiday destination<br />

from an informed position” and “From Here to<br />

Ibiza: hydrological, palaeontological and mineralogical<br />

opportunities for all”.<br />

Roger Trend<br />

Answer. Walt Disney World<br />

67 www.esta-uk.org


TEACHING EARTH SCIENCES ● Volume 27 ● Number 3, 2002<br />

Hydrogeology, Pollution and Cemeteries<br />

MIKE LELLIOTT<br />

A large step forward towards water awareness was reached in August 2002 with the UN Secretary<br />

General, Kofi Annan, identifying that “water is a fundamental resource for sustaining life and for<br />

conserving the natural environment” (World Summit on Sustainable Development). A lack of<br />

management in the evaluation, provision and use of water resources was identified as the basis<br />

to water problems seen in many countries. Water resources have to be managed to provide<br />

sufficient safe water for drinking, adequate sanitation facilities, food production, industry and<br />

many other purposes; but not removing excessive water to effect the ecological functions of<br />

wetlands and other ecosystems. Good management stems from a clear understanding of water<br />

and the issues facing water. This article aims to increase understanding of water, and more<br />

specifically “groundwater”, on two fronts; firstly, the origins and movement of water, and<br />

secondly the pollution of water.<br />

The Hydrological Cycle<br />

Every year about 110 million million cubic metres of<br />

water falls as precipitation on the land area of the<br />

<strong>Earth</strong> (Price, 1996). If all the water in the atmosphere<br />

were to fall as rain in one event it would produce an<br />

average of about 25 mm of rainfall over the total surface<br />

of the <strong>Earth</strong>. In an average year it is estimated that<br />

1000 mm of rain falls over the entire surface of the<br />

<strong>Earth</strong>, which means about 40 cycles of condensation<br />

and rainfall over a period of a year. This equates to 1<br />

cycle approximately every 10 days, which in the UK<br />

climate is all too believable. If all this water is falling,<br />

and there is no apparent loss of water from the<br />

oceans, then it must be being recycled. This recycling<br />

of water is explained by the water cycle, which is simply<br />

a system of water transferral between stores, wellknown<br />

to readers. The ocean is the largest store of<br />

water, but water molecules may also spend periods of<br />

time stored in ice caps, or in the pore spaces of rocks.<br />

The exception to this is for very small water losses in<br />

the upper atmosphere to hydrogen and oxygen, and<br />

broken down by plants during photosynthesis to help<br />

form carbohydrates.<br />

A large amount of precipitation occurs over the<br />

ocean, and consequently short circuits the water cycle.<br />

Water precipitated over land may take several routes<br />

through the remainder of the cycle. Some will be intercepted<br />

by foliage, and held on the leaves of trees and<br />

plants until it evaporates. Some will fall on impermeable<br />

surfaces such as certain rocks or man made constructions<br />

and can either collects in puddles and<br />

evaporates, or run off into natural or artificial drainage<br />

channels. The remainder of water falls directly on soil,<br />

with movement largely controlled by the soil type and<br />

condition, of which movement can be divided into<br />

three broad groups (Price, 1996):<br />

● Water evaporated directly or by transpiration from<br />

vegetation (Evapotranspiration)<br />

● Run over soil surface (overland flow) or in the near<br />

surface soil (interflow) until it reaches a ditch or<br />

stream<br />

● Or may soak into deeper layers of soil and perhaps<br />

into the underlying rock<br />

If the soil is dry and rainfall is light, all water reaching<br />

the ground will infiltrate into the soil and be held there<br />

as films of moisture which surround individual soil<br />

particles. This water is held in the soil until it is either<br />

evaporated directly or taken up by plants. As each successive<br />

layer of soil absorbs water, infiltration moves on<br />

downward, through the unsaturated zone until the<br />

infiltration reaches the water table and joins groundwater<br />

in the saturated zone. The precipitation that<br />

reaches the water table is termed recharge.<br />

The maximum rate at which water can enter the soil<br />

is called the infiltration capacity of the soil (Price,<br />

1996). If the rain is exceptionally heavy, if the soil has a<br />

low infiltration capacity, or if the ground is already saturated<br />

then a situation can arise where the infiltration<br />

capacity is exceeded. This results in overland flow.<br />

Overland flow is relatively rare and can often flow over<br />

short distances before sinking into soil elsewhere.<br />

If rocks beneath the soil are impermeable, or if there<br />

is contrasting permeability within the soil there will be<br />

a tendency for interflow, where water moves laterally<br />

through the unsaturated zone until arriving at streams<br />

or drains.<br />

Water that reaches the water table becomes groundwater.<br />

So what is groundwater The simplest definition<br />

is that groundwater is water contained in saturated soil<br />

and rock material below the surface of the earth. This<br />

groundwater then percolates slowly though the aquifer<br />

at rates varying from metres per day to millimetres per<br />

year (see Figure 1). The groundwater moves towards an<br />

outlet, which is usually a point where the water table<br />

intersects the ground surface, such as a river or spring<br />

www.esta-uk.org<br />

68


TEACHING EARTH SCIENCES ● Volume 27 ● Number 3, 2002<br />

or induced by abstraction. These are collectively known<br />

as discharge areas.<br />

Groundwater moves from areas of high hydraulic<br />

head to areas of low hydraulic head. Hydraulic head<br />

comprises of two parameters – elevation and pressure.<br />

At the water table pressure is zero, so elevation defines<br />

hydraulic head, and consequently groundwater moves<br />

from high to low elevation.<br />

So we understand that groundwater moves from<br />

recharge to discharge areas, or from high head to low<br />

head. But how does the water move through the rock<br />

The movement of groundwater through aquifers is due<br />

to either permeability or fractures. The permeability of<br />

a rock is simply how well the pore spaces, or porosity,<br />

are connected. If a rock has a high permeability then<br />

groundwater will flow. The movement of groundwater<br />

through the gaps between grains of a rock is termed<br />

intergranular flow and is the predominant flow<br />

mechanism for sands and sandstone.<br />

The second mechanism for groundwater movement<br />

is via fractures. The chalk of the UK has a high<br />

porosity of about 40%, but a low permeability, due to<br />

the fine-grained nature of the matrix resulting in pore<br />

throats of approximately 1µm. However, the chalk is<br />

heavily fractured and these fractures can allow rapid<br />

transport of groundwater. The fractures contribute to<br />

approximately 1% of total porosity, but almost all the<br />

groundwater yield.<br />

Figure 1:<br />

Groundwater residence time and discharge<br />

(IPR/35-35c British Geological Survey © NERC. All rights reserved.)<br />

Figure 2:<br />

Groundwater usage distribution in the UK<br />

(UK Groundwater Forum)<br />

UK Groundwater Resources<br />

In the UK 28% of our water supply is sourced from<br />

groundwater. However, this usage depends on geographical<br />

position (see Figure 2). In the south of<br />

England up to 72% of water supply is from groundwater,<br />

whereas in Scotland this is as low as 3%. This<br />

high usage, unsurprisingly, coincides with the main<br />

aquifers. The usage is also high in the south and east<br />

due to a high population density reducing the potential<br />

for reservoirs, and a lower rainfall than the northwest.<br />

Approximately 55% of groundwater is<br />

abstracted from the chalk (see Figure 2), and 26%<br />

from the Permo – Triassic sandstones. The remaining<br />

19% is sourced from Devonian sandstone, Carboniferous<br />

and Permian limestone and Cretaceous<br />

sandstone. The use of groundwater is likely to<br />

increase further as population and usage increases<br />

and therefore any contamination of the resource is of<br />

major concern for the supply of high quality drinking<br />

water.<br />

Pollution<br />

The majority of people have seen a polluted stream or<br />

lake. Surface waters are readily vulnerable to pollution<br />

and a contaminated river is visibly obvious. The awareness<br />

of the ease of polluting surface waters, and its high<br />

visibility and consequently priority to the general public,<br />

has resulted in actions to protect them, and for the<br />

water to be treated.<br />

69 www.esta-uk.org


TEACHING EARTH SCIENCES ● Volume 27 ● Number 3, 2002<br />

Figure 3:<br />

Potentially<br />

polluting activities<br />

(UK Groundwater<br />

Forum)<br />

Groundwater may not be pure, but it is less vulnerable<br />

to simple pollution as seen in rivers and lakes.<br />

However, this leads to a misconception that groundwater<br />

is invulnerable to pollution. Two factors, perhaps<br />

above all others, have led to a false sense of security over<br />

groundwater pollution. The first is the slow speeds of<br />

typical groundwater movement. From the time a molecule<br />

of water enters the ground as recharge to the time<br />

it leaves the aquifer is rarely less than years, and may be<br />

centuries or millennia (Price, 1996). The second factor<br />

is the enormous capacity of most aquifers to adsorb and<br />

dilute pollutants. This arises from the size and volumes<br />

of water held in storage and from the efforts of dispersion<br />

and adsorption as groundwater flows through the<br />

aquifer by advection. This delays the contaminant<br />

emergence from the ground and often dilutes sufficiently<br />

for no detection. The contamination can then<br />

continue until by the time it is discovered the total<br />

quantity of pollutant in and moving through the aquifer<br />

may be very large. Also the factor of “out of site out of<br />

mind” applies, where any contamination that is not visible<br />

is not seen as a major problem and results in a lower<br />

public awareness of such issues. A consequence of the<br />

groundwater being out of site is that any contamination<br />

is hard to detect and monitor, and the task of cleaning<br />

up a polluted aquifer is enormous.<br />

With increasingly stricter standards required for<br />

water quality and increasingly sensitive detection<br />

equipment the release of contaminants can lead to a situation<br />

where large volumes of groundwater are theoretically<br />

unfit for human consumption. It is therefore<br />

important to take a preventative rather than curative<br />

approach to groundwater pollution.<br />

There is a large range of human activities that can<br />

result in pollution of groundwater. (see Figure 3). The<br />

obvious examples are contamination due to hydrocarbons<br />

(NAPL’s) such as leaky storage tanks at petrol stations<br />

or oil and gas power stations or industrial storage<br />

sites. Another common source of contamination is<br />

from landfill and also septic tanks. All of the above<br />

examples are point source types of pollution. There is<br />

also diffuse source pollution, which can arise from<br />

large areas of land during farming operations. A third<br />

group of pollution arises from line sources, such as<br />

railway sidings or roads where excessive pollutants such<br />

as pesticides or salt are used.<br />

As people’s awareness of pollution improves, and<br />

regulations become stricter, many current practices are<br />

identified as having the potential to pollute the environment.<br />

One such practice is burial sites.<br />

Cemeteries<br />

There are many anecdotal references to cemeteries,<br />

such as a higher incidence of typhoid fever among people<br />

living near a cemetery in Berlin between 1863 and<br />

1867 (Bouwer, 1978) or a “sweetish taste and infected<br />

odour” of water from wells close to cemeteries in Paris,<br />

especially in hot summers (Bouwer, 1978). There has<br />

also been an historical prevalence of placing drinking<br />

wells in close proximity to cemeteries or graveyards. A<br />

quote from Holme (1896), states:<br />

“It is a fact that many wells, conduits and pumps in<br />

and around London were, and still are, in close proximity<br />

to churchyards, or even within them”<br />

“Another [pump] in St Georges [churchyard] was<br />

used for drinking water until the Revd Harry Jones,<br />

during a cholera scare, hung a large placard on it reading<br />

‘dead men’s broth!’”<br />

To understand the potential for pollution from<br />

cemeteries we have to understand the processes that<br />

generate the contaminants, however gruesome it may<br />

appear. There are 5 stages of human body decomposition<br />

recognised:<br />

1. Fresh<br />

2. Bloat<br />

3. Active decay<br />

4. Advanced decay<br />

5. Dry skeletal remains<br />

www.esta-uk.org<br />

70


TEACHING EARTH SCIENCES ● Volume 27 ● Number 3, 2002<br />

The decay process begins as early as half an hour after<br />

death, with muscular flaccidity, desiccation (dull eyeballs)<br />

and hypostasis (drainage of blood under gravity).<br />

A human corpse normally decays totally within a period<br />

of 10-12 years with over half of the contaminant<br />

loading leached within the first year of decomposition.<br />

This gives each human body an approximate contamination<br />

life span of 10 years, depending on prevailing<br />

conditions such as temperature, chemical conditions<br />

surrounding material.<br />

The degradation of a human body is analogous to a<br />

landfill filled with putrescible waste, with a couple of<br />

minor exceptions, and is principally controlled by<br />

microbial decay. The principle outputs for a landfill<br />

containing putrescible waste is summarised in Figure<br />

4. Decomposition begins when aerobic bacteria get to<br />

work. The action of these bacteria consumes the oxygen<br />

that was incorporated in the waste and produces<br />

carbon dioxide. This first stage of decomposition usually<br />

takes from a few weeks to a few months (Phase I).<br />

When the oxygen has been consumed, anaerobic bacteria<br />

take over and produce more carbon dioxide and<br />

fatty acids. Methane also begins to be produced. There<br />

is large-scale settlement in Stages I and II. In Stage III<br />

the fatty acids are themselves broken down to produce<br />

more methane. Stage IV is an equilibrium phase<br />

where the landfill or body acts as a natural bioreactor.<br />

The characteristic feature of this stage is the generation<br />

of relatively constant levels of methane and carbon<br />

dioxide. This only ends when the putrescible<br />

component source is exhausted (Stage V) and aerobic<br />

conditions return. At the same time there is gas produced,<br />

inorganic material contribute to the composition<br />

of leachate.<br />

The principal differences between a landfill and<br />

decomposition of a human body are that the ratio of<br />

Carbon to Nitrogen to Phosphorous (30:3:1) in a<br />

human body provides a good balance between the principal<br />

microbial nutrients. Landfills are generally deficient<br />

in Phosphorous. Also, more importantly, the rate<br />

of leachate production in a grave is far higher than in a<br />

landfill. Modern landfills are designed with low permeability<br />

clay caps to reduce the amount of precipitation<br />

infiltrating into the landfill, which helps to reduce the<br />

amount of leachate produced. Graves are not, and they<br />

actually act as preferential channels for infiltration as<br />

they are filled with disturbed material. Secondly a<br />

human body contains nearly double the amount of<br />

water found in an average landfill, also aiding to<br />

leachate production. Therefore, human bodies decompose<br />

more efficiently than putrescible waste in a landfill,<br />

with the process generating leachate containing the<br />

following main contaminants:<br />

● Organic compounds<br />

● Ammonical nitrogen and nitrate<br />

● Principle mobile anions (Chloride and Sulphate in<br />

particular)<br />

● Alkali earth metals (NA, K, Ca, Mg, Fe etc)<br />

● Pathogens (Staphylococcus aureus, Bacillus cereus,<br />

Clostridium perfrigens)<br />

● Viruses (Enteroviruses, Polioviruses, Echovirus,<br />

Hepatitis A, Reovirus and Rotavirus)<br />

Pollution Risk from Cemeteries<br />

We have seen that bodies decompose and produce a<br />

range of contaminants, but are these contaminants likely<br />

to become a source of pollution Modern landfills<br />

generally have a low risk of pollution because their pollution<br />

potential is well recognised and suitable measures<br />

are in place. As mentioned previously, modern<br />

landfills have low permeability clay caps to reduce infiltration<br />

(see Figure 5).<br />

Landfills also have a clay liner at the base that is engineered<br />

to a low permeability (10 -9 m/sec) and often a<br />

Figure 4:<br />

Organic and nonorganic<br />

products<br />

from a putrescible<br />

waste landfill<br />

Figure 5:<br />

Modern<br />

Landfill design<br />

(UK Groundwater<br />

Forum)<br />

71 www.esta-uk.org


TEACHING EARTH SCIENCES ● Volume 27 ● Number 3, 2002<br />

Figure 6:<br />

Mechanisms for<br />

dispersion in the<br />

saturated zone<br />

synthetic liner on top of even lower permeability. This<br />

acts to contain all leachates, which can then be removed<br />

if required. A down side to this is that it can hinder<br />

decomposition, but it does reduce risk of a pollution<br />

incident.<br />

This type of precaution is not seen at cemetery sites,<br />

yet there are over 200,000 burials per year (Young et al,<br />

2001), which equates to 12,000 tonnes of decomposing<br />

material (based on average body weight of 60kg). However,<br />

if burials were so contaminating then there would<br />

be widespread pollution as a result, and awareness<br />

would be high, as seen with landfills. This lack of<br />

awareness is either due to a lack of research in correlating<br />

pollution incidences with cemeteries or that the<br />

contaminants are attenuated. The attenuation of contaminants<br />

has much to do with the environment in<br />

which the burial occurs. As mentioned earlier a grave<br />

acts as a conduit for infiltration, due to the presence of<br />

disturbed infilled material. This infiltrated water then<br />

can dissolve and react with the products of degradation<br />

to produce the leachate. What happens next The<br />

movement of leachate from the grave “cell” is primarily<br />

determined by the surrounding strata and geology,<br />

with 3 principle components of pathways from the<br />

grave:<br />

● The soil surrounding the burial<br />

● The unsaturated zone of the underlying aquifer<br />

(if present)<br />

● The saturated zone of the aquifer (if present)<br />

The principle characteristics of each pathway are:<br />

1) Soil Pathways: Soils are often more complex in<br />

terms of composition, chemistry and biological<br />

activity than the underlying rocks or sediments from<br />

which they are derived. They may be the site of<br />

intense biochemical reactions, so that contaminants<br />

may undergo change as they pass through them. Air<br />

access to soils is generally good and likely to be aerobic,<br />

unless waterlogged, and this encourages oxidation<br />

of pollutants (i.e. Ammonia to nitrite and<br />

nitrate). The physical processes of filtration, adsorption,<br />

absorption and cation exchange are all important<br />

attenuating processes.<br />

2) Unsaturated zone pathways: These zones are generally<br />

less chemically and biologically active than the<br />

overlying soils. The rate of re-oxygenation from the<br />

surface is lower than in soils and anoxic conditions<br />

may develop. Nevertheless, chemical and biochemical<br />

reactions may continue to immobilise pollutants,<br />

whilst filtration, adsorption and cation exchange<br />

may continue to immobilise pollutants and some<br />

dissolved pollutants.<br />

3) Saturated zone pathway: Once in the saturated zone<br />

the contaminant begins to follow the regional<br />

groundwater movement (depending on relative densities<br />

of water and contaminant). The contaminant is<br />

transported with the groundwater by advection. The<br />

groundwater/contaminants are subject to dispersion<br />

(see Figure 6), and is the principle cause for dilution<br />

in the saturated zone. There are additional factors<br />

such as chemical and biological reactions, or filtration<br />

and diffusion.<br />

From this we can see how important the unsaturated<br />

and saturated zones are in attenuating the pollutants<br />

from a burial and that the potential for a cemetery to<br />

pollute is often largely dependent on the vulnerability<br />

of the soil, unsaturated zone and groundwater (see<br />

Figure 7). A thin sandy soil (little material for chemical<br />

reactions), a thin unsaturated zone and highly fractured,<br />

rapid transport aquifer would be highly<br />

vulnerable to pollution; whereas a thick clayey/organic<br />

rich soil, with thick unsaturated zone and deep<br />

water table offers good protection of groundwater<br />

from contamination.<br />

The potential risk from many of the contaminants is<br />

well documented, and their attenuation in aquifers is<br />

relatively well known. However, the study of bacteria<br />

and virus transport in aquifers is relatively new. Studies<br />

have shown several microbial contaminants in the<br />

groundwater associated with cemeteries. One of the<br />

most significant was Staphylococcus aureus, and is a bacteria<br />

commonly associated with human decomposition.<br />

Other potentially harmful bacteria resulting from<br />

human decay are Bacillus cereus and Clostridium perfrigens.<br />

There are also a series of potentially harmful viruses<br />

such as: Enteroviruses, Polioviruses, Echovirus,<br />

Hepatitis A, Reovirus and Rotavirus.<br />

Most enteric pathogens die within 2-3 months once<br />

outside the human gut, however, under cold conditions<br />

they could survive up to years. Enterovirus survival has<br />

been reported to range from 25 to 170 days. There is,<br />

however, a lack of research and consequently understanding,<br />

into firstly the potentially harmful microbes<br />

produced from decomposition, and secondly the<br />

www.esta-uk.org<br />

72


TEACHING EARTH SCIENCES ● Volume 27 ● Number 3, 2002<br />

mobility and survival of these microbes in groundwater.<br />

An understanding of these factors needs to be considered<br />

before an assessment of the potential risk from<br />

bacteria and viruses resulting from decomposition can<br />

be made.<br />

Conclusions<br />

An increased awareness of water – from a resource perspective<br />

and a pollution perspective – is critical for sustainable<br />

development. Water is continuously recycled as<br />

part of the water cycle, of which groundwater is just one<br />

part. The movement of water through the ground<br />

occurs by two mechanisms; firstly water moving<br />

between grains of material, termed intergranular flow,<br />

and secondly water moving along fractures, termed<br />

fracture flow. In the UK there is a large dependency on<br />

groundwater in southern England (72%), and a low<br />

dependency in Scotland (3%). This is primarily due to<br />

the location of the main water bearing units, or<br />

aquifers, in southern and central England, but also<br />

because of the high population density in southern<br />

England reducing space available for reservoirs.<br />

Groundwater can be polluted by a wide range of<br />

activities, either from a small aerial area, point source;<br />

from a large aerial area, diffuse source; or from a line<br />

source. An increasing understanding of pollution has<br />

helped identify many previously unthought-of potentially<br />

polluting activities, one of which is cemeteries. A<br />

human body decomposes in 10-12 years, depending on<br />

prevailing conditions. For this period the human body<br />

acts as a potential contaminant source, with ammonia,<br />

organic compounds, bacteria and viruses being some of<br />

the products. The surrounding soil, unsaturated zone<br />

and saturated zone control the movement of these contaminants<br />

with the lowering of contaminant concentrations,<br />

or attenuation, largely occurring in the soil zone<br />

due to complex composition and chemistry allowing<br />

biochemical reactions, chemical reactions, filtration,<br />

and adsorption. In the saturated zone, attenuation of<br />

contaminants is principally controlled by dispersion<br />

within the main groundwater flow. There are many<br />

unknowns in contamination arising from cemeteries,<br />

principally the presence and movement of bacteria and<br />

viruses, and therefore continued research is required to<br />

improve understanding and help towards the management<br />

of the “fundamental resource for sustaining life<br />

and for conserving the natural environment”.<br />

Mike Lelliott<br />

British Geological Survey<br />

Keyworth<br />

Nottingham<br />

NG12 5GG<br />

Tel. 0115 936 3206<br />

mlell@bgs.ac.uk<br />

Figure 7:<br />

Vulnerability of<br />

groundwater<br />

(UK Groundwater Forum)<br />

References<br />

Price, Mike (1996) Introducing Groundwater. 2nd edition. Stanley Thornes<br />

Ltd.<br />

Ward, R.C & Robinson, M. (2000). Principles of Hydrology. 4th Edition.<br />

McGraw-Hill.<br />

Young, C.P., Blackmore, K.M., Reynolds, P & Leavens, A. (2001).<br />

Pollution Potential of Cemeteries. R&D Project Record P2/024/1.<br />

Young, C.P., Blackmore, K.M., Reynolds, P & Leavens, A. (2001).<br />

Pollution Potential of Cemeteries. R&D Technical Report.<br />

Holmes, B. (1896). The London Burial Grounds. T Fisher Unwin<br />

Bouwer, H. (1978). Groundwater Hydrology. McGraw-Hill<br />

73 www.esta-uk.org


TEACHING EARTH SCIENCES ● Volume 27 ● Number 3, 2002<br />

Mass Extinctions:<br />

The Alternatives to “Deep Impact”<br />

ROSALIND V. WHITE<br />

This article is based on a presentation given to an INSET meeting for Post-16 Geology teachers at<br />

the ESTA Annual Course and Conference, Keyworth, September 2002.<br />

“<strong>Earth</strong>’s biggest mass extinction 251 million years ago was triggered by a collision with a comet<br />

or asteroid, US scientists say.” (BBC News website, 23 February 2001)<br />

“A huge outpouring of molten rock 250 million years ago may have been the decisive factor in the<br />

deaths of nearly all lifeforms on the <strong>Earth</strong> at that time.” (BBC News website, 6 June 2002)<br />

Figure 1.<br />

The five mass<br />

extinctions of the<br />

Phanerozoic (after<br />

Sepkoski, 1984).<br />

Confronted with openly conflicting headlines<br />

such as this, how should teachers react One of<br />

the main difficulties facing post-16 students is<br />

the realisation that science is an active process that,<br />

instead of giving “correct” answers, just yields a reasonable<br />

theory that fits the evidence we have at any particular<br />

time. This is especially true of topics on the AS/A2<br />

syllabus that are also the focus of active research at university<br />

level. Less-than-impartial media reporting of<br />

new advances can add to the confusion. This article<br />

gives an overview of the possible reasons for mass<br />

extinctions at the Permo-Triassic and Cretaceous-Tertiary<br />

boundaries, and outlines recent developments in<br />

research on the Permo-Triassic extinction.<br />

What is a mass extinction<br />

It is important that students understand the distinctions<br />

between death, extinction, and mass extinction. Death<br />

is an issue affecting individuals, with a 100% probability<br />

per organism. Extinction occurs for a particular<br />

species when the death rate exceeds the birth rate for a<br />

sufficiently long period. Extinctions happen all the<br />

time: the vast majority of species that have ever inhabited<br />

the <strong>Earth</strong> are now extinct. The rate at which species<br />

replace one another due to factors such as competition<br />

is known as “background extinction”.<br />

At some times in geological history, the extinction<br />

rate increases markedly above this background level,<br />

and this is known as a “mass extinction”, defined as the<br />

extinction of a significant proportion of the world’s<br />

biota in a geologically insignificant period of time. Of<br />

course, we can then argue about the meaning of the<br />

word ‘insignificant’, but for the purposes of this article,<br />

the term “mass extinction” is reserved specifically for<br />

the five most significant events of the last 500 million<br />

years (see Figure 1).<br />

Causes of mass extinctions: killing mechanisms<br />

Surprisingly, there are actually only a handful of ways to<br />

die: by direct physical trauma; via poisoning; through<br />

starvation; or by suffocation. It’s possible to reclassify<br />

all sorts of other deaths into these categories, e.g., death<br />

from old age could be as a result of being physically<br />

unable to collect or eat food (starvation) or inability to<br />

breathe (suffocation), and death from disease could<br />

potentially kill by any of the four mechanisms. However,<br />

to cause a mass extinction, we need to kill millions of<br />

individuals (or stop them reproducing), all within a relatively<br />

short period of time, so we need a mechanism<br />

that can cause direct physical trauma, poisoning, suffocation<br />

or starvation on a massive scale. Because of the<br />

apparent need for a catastrophic driving force, much of<br />

the recent research has focused on two scenarios: meteorite<br />

impact, or massive scale volcanism.<br />

The K-T impact<br />

In 1980, Alvarez proposed that a meteorite impact was<br />

responsible for the Cretaceous-Tertiary (K-T) mass<br />

extinction. This proposal was based primarily on the<br />

presence of elevated iridium concentrations (“iridium<br />

anomalies”) in rocks at the K-T boundary. Iridium is a<br />

siderophile (iron-loving) element that is very rare in<br />

crustal rocks, but is much more abundant in certain<br />

classes of meteorite. Over the subsequent two decades,<br />

more evidence for an impact was amassed, including<br />

www.esta-uk.org<br />

74


TEACHING EARTH SCIENCES ● Volume 27 ● Number 3, 2002<br />

tektites (once-molten droplets), shocked quartz,<br />

stishovite and microdiamonds (high pressure minerals),<br />

soot from wildfires, and exotic minerals (e.g.,<br />

spinels). This data-gathering culminated in the discovery<br />

of a ~180-km-diameter buried crater at Chicxulub,<br />

located on the Yucatan Peninsula of Mexico. A crater<br />

this large would have been caused by an impactor<br />

roughly 10 km in diameter, and the impact would have<br />

had devastating effects on life.<br />

Impact Winter<br />

What would have happened when the meteorite hit<br />

The scenario painted is gloomy. A fireball scorched<br />

everything in its path, and violent tsunami and widespread<br />

wildfires occurred. There would have been a<br />

lengthy period when sunlight was obscured by dust<br />

particles, reducing temperatures, hindering photosynthesis<br />

and resulting in breakdowns in the food chain.<br />

The meteorite landed on (and vaporised) gypsum and<br />

limestone, injecting sulphur dioxide and carbon dioxide<br />

into the atmosphere. The sulphur dioxide resulted<br />

in acid rain, and excess carbon dioxide contributed to<br />

greenhouse warming.<br />

At the present day, even though most geologists are<br />

convinced that there was a meteorite impact at the K-T<br />

boundary, and believe that its environmental effects<br />

would have been severe, discussion continues about<br />

what actually caused the K-T extinction. For example,<br />

on 31 August 2002, the BBC News website reported<br />

that “Cold was killing dinosaurs long before the asteroid<br />

commonly thought to have been their downfall hit,<br />

according to scientists.”<br />

Flood basalt volcanism<br />

The major thorn in the side of the impact theory is the<br />

fact that a meteorite impact was not the only catastrophic<br />

event to affect the <strong>Earth</strong> in Cretaceous-Tertiary<br />

times. In India, a vast “flood basalt” volcanic province<br />

called the Deccan Traps was being erupted. The current<br />

consensus amongst geologists is that flood basalts are<br />

the result of melt generation in mantle plumes: convective<br />

upwellings of anomalously hot material in the<br />

underlying mantle. Estimates of the original volume of<br />

the Deccan Traps are in the range of 1 to 2 million cubic<br />

kilometres, enough to cover the United Kingdom in a<br />

layer of lava 4-8 km thick! Individual eruptions may<br />

have lasted about a decade, with periods of quiescence<br />

lasting for centuries or millennia between eruptions.<br />

What was even more problematic for those advocating<br />

a meteorite impact as the sole cause of the K-T<br />

extinction was the observation that other mass extinctions<br />

also seemed to be temporally linked with the<br />

eruption of flood basalt provinces (see Figure 2). The<br />

biggest mass extinction of all, the Permo-Triassic (P-Tr)<br />

extinction, coincides exactly with the eruption of the<br />

Siberian Traps, and work published in 2002 shows that<br />

this province is twice as large as had previously been<br />

thought. Another example is the Triassic-Jurassic (Tr-J)<br />

extinction, which was contemporaneous with eruption<br />

of the Central Atlantic Magmatic Province, 200 million<br />

years ago.<br />

Volcanic Winter<br />

What would the <strong>Earth</strong> have been like during this massive<br />

scale volcanism Dust and ash were thrown up into<br />

the atmosphere, together with tiny aerosol droplets of<br />

sulphuric acid derived from volcanic sulphur dioxide<br />

gas. These particles obscured sunlight, possibly for<br />

months or years on end, reducing temperatures and<br />

hampering photosynthesis. The sulphuric aerosols ultimately<br />

fell back to the ground as acid rain. Lava set fire<br />

to vegetation, causing wildfires. Toxic fumes derived<br />

from fluorine and chlorine resulted in local poisoning.<br />

Carbon dioxide was injected into the atmosphere, contributing<br />

to greenhouse warming on longer timescales.<br />

And the worst of it is, just when things were recovering,<br />

there would be another eruption, and it would all happen<br />

again.<br />

Volcanism or impact<br />

As you can see, the effects of large volcanic eruptions<br />

and meteorite impacts are potentially fairly similar.<br />

This means that discussions of their environmental<br />

effects, while interesting, are not a particularly good<br />

way of deciding what actually caused the extinctions.<br />

We are called upon to make judgements about whether<br />

one serious event would be more serious than the<br />

cumulative effects of lots of smaller events.<br />

Unfortunately, because we are dealing with evidence<br />

that is millions of years old, there are many pieces of the<br />

jigsaw missing, and with the available data it’s impossible<br />

for either side to prove their case. This resulted in an<br />

uneasy stand-off, with volcano-theory supporters conceding<br />

that, in the case of the K-T, the “impactors” had<br />

a good case, but maintaining that the Deccan Traps<br />

must surely have had some significant effect. They also<br />

pointed out that the impact theory doesn’t seem very<br />

good at accounting for the other extinctions, which<br />

must, therefore, be volcanism-related. The impact-the-<br />

Figure 2.<br />

Timing of eruption<br />

of flood basalt<br />

provinces<br />

compared to the<br />

rate of extinctions.<br />

The three largest<br />

extinctions all<br />

correlate with<br />

flood basalt<br />

activity, but the<br />

lack of extinctions<br />

associated with<br />

other flood basalts<br />

demonstrates that<br />

flood basalts do<br />

not, on their own,<br />

necessarily cause<br />

mass extinctions.<br />

75 www.esta-uk.org


TEACHING EARTH SCIENCES ● Volume 27 ● Number 3, 2002<br />

ory supporters, meanwhile, were busily searching for<br />

evidence of impacts at other mass extinction horizons.<br />

Impact at the P-Tr and Tr-J boundaries<br />

In the mid-eighties, the first paper claiming to have<br />

found an iridium anomaly at the P-Tr boundary was<br />

published, but subsequent work found the anomalies<br />

to be insignificant, or non-existent. More recently, in<br />

February 2001, the British national newspapers proclaimed,<br />

“Comet killed life before dinosaurs”, and the<br />

debate about an impact at the end of the Permian<br />

recommenced. The articles arose from reports of<br />

fullerenes (carbon ‘buckyballs’) in P-Tr boundary sediments;<br />

the fullerenes contain trapped noble gases<br />

with isotopic ratios indicative of an extraterrestrial<br />

source. These results are highly controversial:<br />

attempts to replicate them have so far been unsuccessful,<br />

and the experimental details of the original work<br />

have also been questioned.<br />

For the Tr-J extinction, early searches for iridium<br />

If there really were large life-threatening impacts,<br />

even if the craters themselves have been subducted or<br />

destroyed by tectonism, the fallout would have been<br />

global, and I’m sure we’ll see a steady stream of<br />

supporting evidence published over the next few years<br />

anomalies were negative. However, a paper published<br />

in 2002 reports a small iridium anomaly, indicating that<br />

a small bolide impact occurred at this time.<br />

Likelihood of meteorite impacts<br />

My personal view is that I remain to be convinced that<br />

significant meteorite impacts occurred at these other two<br />

extinction horizons. That isn’t to say I don’t believe it –<br />

I am keeping an open mind! The key issue here (again)<br />

is the meaning of the word ‘significant’. If there really<br />

were large life-threatening impacts, even if the craters<br />

themselves have been subducted or destroyed by tectonism,<br />

the fallout would have been global, and I’m<br />

sure we’ll see a steady stream of supporting evidence<br />

published over the next few years. Then I’ll probably<br />

believe it. The reason for my scepticism is that smaller<br />

impacts happen fairly frequently, geologically speaking,<br />

and discovery of their products in the relevant time<br />

interval doesn’t prove anything about whether they<br />

were large enough to cause extinctions.<br />

Take, for example, the story of Manicouagan Crater<br />

in Canada. It is 100 km in diameter, and was once considered<br />

a very likely suspect for the Triassic-Jurassic<br />

extinction, at 200 Ma. However, when the crater was<br />

dated, it turned out that it was 14 million years older<br />

than the extinction, so could not have been the cause.<br />

And what’s more, there is no mass extinction at 214 Ma,<br />

so impacts causing craters as large as 100 km across<br />

don’t necessarily cause extinctions.<br />

We don’t know exactly how often impacts of different<br />

sizes occur. Geologists estimate impact frequencies by<br />

counting craters of different sizes on parts of the <strong>Earth</strong>’s<br />

surface unaffected by tectonism, and the results from<br />

this agree fairly well with astronomers’ estimates<br />

derived from counting bodies with <strong>Earth</strong>-crossing<br />

orbits. However, the errors are large – something like a<br />

factor of two. Nevertheless, as more craters and <strong>Earth</strong>crossing<br />

bodies are discovered, it seems that the original<br />

1980 estimate of a 100-million-year repeat time for<br />

a K-T-sized impact is an overestimate. Estimates of<br />

impact frequency published within the last five years<br />

yield a repeat time of only ~30 million years for a K-Tsized<br />

impactor, and 100-km craters would form even<br />

more frequently – every 10 million years or so.<br />

Do meteorite impacts cause flood basalt volcanism<br />

If claims for meteorite impacts at the P-Tr and Tr-J<br />

boundaries turn out to be true, and each of the three<br />

main extinctions correlate with both an impact and a<br />

flood basalt, does that mean that flood basalts are also a<br />

consequence of meteorite impacts After all, doesn’t it<br />

seem rather unlikely that impacts and flood basalts<br />

would coincide on three occasions if they were not<br />

linked in some way Although this idea has been aired<br />

in the media, it is only believed by a minority of geologists.<br />

Originally proposed for the K-T impact and the<br />

Deccan Traps, it does not adequately explain our observations:<br />

the discovery of the iridium-rich layer between<br />

lava flows of the Deccan Traps indicates that the lavas<br />

started erupting well before the meteorite hit. Moreover,<br />

the Deccan Traps were not at the impact site, and<br />

contrary to some claims, they weren’t directly opposite<br />

it either.<br />

In fact, because both impacts and flood basalts are<br />

more common than they are perceived to be, random<br />

chance is capable of explaining away a few coincidences<br />

between impacts and flood basalt volcanism. This<br />

analysis is dependent on the size of impact chosen:<br />

because smaller impacts are much more common, a<br />

few coincidences between flood basalts and, say, 100-<br />

km craters are entirely credible. If, however, evidence<br />

comes to light that several flood basalts correlate with<br />

200-km craters, I may have to reconsider my opinion!<br />

“Meteorites vs. volcanoes” oversimplifies the story<br />

Of course, in reality, it’s much more complicated than<br />

choosing between impacts and volcanoes. At the P-Tr<br />

boundary, for example, there’s evidence of other<br />

adverse environmental conditions. Discovery of pyrite<br />

in shallow water sediments demonstrates that the shallow<br />

oceans were oxygen-deficient (anoxic) – in which<br />

case, many organisms would have suffocated. This<br />

oceanic anoxia was probably a consequence of global<br />

warming, which reduced the pole-to-equator temperature<br />

gradient and made ocean circulation sluggish. This<br />

global warming may, in turn, have been caused by CO2<br />

release from the Siberian Traps, or from an impact site.<br />

www.esta-uk.org<br />

76


TEACHING EARTH SCIENCES ● Volume 27 ● Number 3, 2002<br />

Additionally, warmer ocean waters may have triggered<br />

the catastrophic release of methane hydrate from<br />

continental shelf sediments. Methane hydrate is a white<br />

crystalline substance consisting of CH4 molecules<br />

trapped in a structure of H2O ‘cages’. It is stable only<br />

when temperatures are low and pressures are high, and<br />

forms in sediments where decay of organic matter by<br />

anaerobic bacteria results in high methane concentrations.<br />

If released during an interval of global warming,<br />

it contributes strongly to the positive feedback loop:<br />

methane is a much more potent greenhouse gas than<br />

carbon dioxide. Evidence supporting an interval of<br />

methane hydrate release at the P-Tr boundary comes<br />

from changes in the carbon isotope composition of<br />

ocean water (see White, 2002 for further reading).<br />

Conclusions<br />

At least three of the major mass extinctions of the last<br />

600 million years appear to be temporally correlated<br />

with flood basalt volcanism, meteorite impact, or possibly<br />

both. However, we should not confuse ‘correlation’<br />

with ‘causation’. Correlation is easy to prove, but causation<br />

very difficult. Flood basalts and meteorite<br />

impacts are both much more common than mass<br />

extinctions, implying that neither type of event routinely,<br />

on its own, causes mass extinctions. Instead, it<br />

seems that mass extinctions only occur when <strong>Earth</strong> is<br />

attacked on more than one front, or when it is already<br />

in a vulnerable state.<br />

Catastrophic events such as meteorite impacts and<br />

massive volcanism provide an attractive means of<br />

explaining mass extinctions. We should be wary, however,<br />

about assuming that catastrophic outcomes necessarily<br />

require catastrophic stimuli. Because of positive<br />

feedback loops in the <strong>Earth</strong>’s biological and climatic<br />

systems, particularly those related to global warming,<br />

small perturbations in conditions may become amplified,<br />

and may potentially lead to catastrophic changes.<br />

This is important, because humans are currently contributing<br />

CO2 to the atmosphere at a rate that, in geological<br />

terms, is unprecedented. If we continue at this<br />

rate for a couple of thousand years, we will have exceeded<br />

the entire CO2 budget of the Siberian Traps. That’s<br />

quite a scary thought. Are we forcing the <strong>Earth</strong> into a<br />

vulnerable condition, such that a meteorite impact, if<br />

(or when) it occurs, will push us over the edge<br />

Catastrophic events such as meteorite impacts and<br />

massive volcanism provide an attractive means of<br />

explaining mass extinctions. We should be wary,<br />

however, about assuming that catastrophic outcomes<br />

necessarily require catastrophic stimuli.<br />

Further Reading<br />

Alvarez, L. W., Alvarez, W., Asaro, F. & Michel, H. V.<br />

(1980) Extraterrestrial cause for the Cretaceous<br />

Tertiary extinction. <strong>Science</strong> 208, 1095-1108.<br />

Becker, L., Poreda, R. J., Hunt, A. G., Bunch, T. E. &<br />

Rampino, M. (2001) Impact event at the Permian-<br />

Triassic boundary: Evidence from extraterrestrial<br />

noble gases in fullerenes. <strong>Science</strong> 291, 1530-1533.<br />

Hallam, A. & Wignall, P. B. (1997) Mass extinctions and<br />

their aftermath. Oxford University Press.<br />

Reichow, M., Saunders, A. D., White, R. V., Pringle,<br />

M. A., Al’Mukhamedov, A., Medvedev, A. & Kirda,<br />

N. P. (2002). 40 Ar/ 39 Ar dates from the West Siberian<br />

Basin: Siberian Flood Basalt Province doubled.<br />

<strong>Science</strong> 296, 1846-1849.<br />

Sepkoski, J. J., Jr. (1984) A kinetic model of<br />

Phanerozoic taxonomic diversity. III. Post-Paleozoic<br />

families and mass extinctions. Paleobiology 10, 246-269.<br />

White, R.V. (2002) <strong>Earth</strong>’s biggest ‘whodunnit’:<br />

unravelling the clues in the case of the end-Permian<br />

mass extinction. Phil. Trans. Royal Soc. London A<br />

360, X-XX (in press). Copies available (pdf files) by e-<br />

mailing the author.<br />

A Powerpoint version of this presentation is<br />

available on request by e-mailing the author.<br />

Rosalind V. White<br />

Royal Society Dorothy Hodgkin Research Fellow<br />

Department of Geology<br />

University of Leicester<br />

University Road<br />

Leicester<br />

LE1 7RH<br />

e-mail: rvw1@le.ac.uk<br />

Telephone: 0116 252 3315<br />

Fax: 0116 252 3918<br />

77 www.esta-uk.org


TEACHING EARTH SCIENCES ● Volume 27 ● Number 3, 2002<br />

Fossils Under the Microscope<br />

IAN WILKINSON<br />

Micropalaeontology is a subject that is not as widely taught as macropalaeontology - everybody<br />

has heard of trilobites, brachiopods and corals, but how many know of the existence of acritarchs,<br />

coccoliths or ostracods Although many organisms really are microscopic (a few microns in<br />

length), I will stretch the term to include fossils up to about 1500 microns across. It is an<br />

impossible task to describe all types of microfossils in the <strong>Earth</strong>’s rocks, but I give a taster of<br />

some of the more common. Microfossils from five kingdoms (see Figure 1) are studied and<br />

applied in finding solutions to geological problems in stratigraphy and palaeoecology. Although<br />

microscopic, it is not beyond the scope of schools to find at least some of these fossils.<br />

Figure 1.<br />

The relationship<br />

of common<br />

microfossils to<br />

kingdoms and cell<br />

type. (Note that<br />

some authors<br />

prefer to use the<br />

term Protoctista<br />

rather than<br />

Protista as the<br />

latter has been<br />

used primarily for<br />

single celled<br />

organisms.)<br />

Plants<br />

Spores<br />

Pollen<br />

Eukaryotes<br />

Prokaryotes<br />

Finding microfossils<br />

Microfossils can easily be extracted from marine,<br />

Mesozoic, Tertiary and Quaternary mudstones, siltstones<br />

and finer sandstones, particularly softer ones<br />

such as the Oxford Clay, Kimmeridge Clay, Gault and<br />

Speeton Clay. Softer chalk can also be disaggregated to<br />

liberate microfossils. However, a little care will be<br />

required as chemicals are involved. Soak the sediment<br />

in (flammable!) white spirit for half an hour then drain<br />

it off through filter paper to be used again. Wash the<br />

sample through a 75 micron (or smaller) sieve; add to<br />

warm water with washing soda and bring the water to<br />

the boil (care required!). Allow it to cool before washing<br />

it again through the sieve. When dry, the residue can<br />

Fungae<br />

Spores<br />

Fruiting Bodies<br />

Protista<br />

Acritarchs<br />

Dinoflagellates<br />

Coccolithophores<br />

Radiolaria<br />

Diatoms<br />

Foraminifera<br />

Algae<br />

Monera<br />

Bacteria<br />

Animals<br />

Conodonts<br />

Ostracods<br />

Chitinozoa<br />

be viewed best through a binocular microscope. Cross<br />

contamination of samples is a danger with microfossils<br />

and all equipment must be thoroughly cleaned after<br />

each sample. Ostracods, foraminifera, radiolaria and so<br />

on will be found with low-powered binocular microscopes<br />

at X10 or X20 magnifications. Other microfossils<br />

are probably beyond the scope of the equipment<br />

found in many schools as more specialised preparation,<br />

including acids, is needed and then high magnification<br />

microscopes are required.<br />

Those schools some distance from suitable rocks<br />

might try modern pond, lake, estuarine or coastal sediments,<br />

where similar organisms can be found. Modern<br />

sediments are the easier to deal with. Soak them in<br />

warm water with teepol or washing soda, before washing<br />

them on a 75 micron sieve to remove all the fine<br />

muds. Allow to dry. Examine the washed sediment<br />

through a binocular microscope at X10 or X20 magnification<br />

to see foraminifera and ostracods, in marine<br />

and estuarine sediments, or ostracods, diatoms and<br />

charophytes in lake and pond sediments.<br />

At the end of this article I give 14 separate summary<br />

boxes to show the range of microfossils across all five<br />

kingdoms.<br />

Kingdom Monera<br />

The history of life begins with the evolution of Kingdom<br />

Monera, and stretches back almost to earliest of<br />

<strong>Earth</strong>’s preserved rocks. Kingdom Monera is based on<br />

the prokaryote cell. These lack membrane bounded<br />

organelles (such as mitochondria and chloroplasts) and<br />

a nucleus with chromosomes. Some may have a simple<br />

flagella composed of the protein flagelin.<br />

There is often debate whether putative microfossils<br />

are actually mineral growths (remember the Martian<br />

‘microfossils’). The oldest undoubted fossil bacteria is<br />

from the 3,465 million year old Apex Chert from Australia,<br />

but there is some dispute whether older ‘microfossils’<br />

are truly biotic. Bacteria must have passed<br />

through a phase of non-biological evolution before<br />

evolving into chemautotrophs and later into the more<br />

advanced photosynthesising organisms. The fact that<br />

www.esta-uk.org<br />

78


TEACHING EARTH SCIENCES ● Volume 27 ● Number 3, 2002<br />

Banded Ironstones began to develop about 3,500Ma<br />

indicates when photosynthesis had evolved.<br />

Blue-green cyanobacteria (formerly known as bluegreen<br />

algae) began to evolve a little later and by<br />

3,000Ma were removing CaCO3 from seawater during<br />

photosynthesis. Stromatolites, thin calcareous mats laid<br />

down one on top of the other by blue green cyanobacteria<br />

form domes, sometimes several metres in height<br />

and 3,000 million years later living representatives are<br />

doing exactly the same thing at Shark Bay in Australia!<br />

The evolution from Prokaryotes to eukaryotes was<br />

probably the most significant step in the evolution of<br />

life. All living organisms (with the exception of Monera)<br />

are based on the eukaryotic cell structure. Eukaryotes<br />

are aerobic and so could only have evolved after<br />

oxygen had built up in the atmosphere. They had a larger<br />

cell than the prokaryotes, with a membrane-bounded<br />

nucleus containing chromosomes of DNA and<br />

RNA and proteins. The eukaryotic cell also contained<br />

membrane-bounded organelles (such as mitochondria).<br />

The composition of the flagella (undulipodia) is<br />

complex, being composed of tubulin and other proteins.<br />

It has been suggested that the eukaryote cell<br />

evolved by the symbiotic relationship of a number of<br />

different prokaryotic cells. So Kingdom Protista had<br />

evolved.<br />

Kingdom Protista<br />

Exactly when eukaryotes evolved is questionable.<br />

There is good fossil evidence of their existence 900-<br />

1,000 million years ago and there is strong evidence that<br />

they were probably around 1,500 million years ago.<br />

However, recent geochemical study on 2,700 million<br />

year old shales has found eukaryote lipids, which if correct,<br />

pushes the origin of the eukaryotes even further<br />

back in time.<br />

The Kingdom Protista is difficult to define and it is<br />

easiest to say what it is not, rather than what it is. They<br />

are not animals because they do not develop from blastula<br />

(a hollow sphere of cells formed from the cleavage<br />

of an ovum). They are not plants as they do not develop<br />

from an embryo (e.g. within a seed). They are not<br />

fungi as they have undulipodia (flagella for locomotion)<br />

and do not develop from spores. They are not Monera<br />

as they have a eukaryote cell structure. In other words,<br />

they have none of the characteristics of more advanced<br />

eukaryotic kingdoms.<br />

Kingdom Protista is perhaps the single most useful<br />

kingdom in the micropalaeontologist’s armoury. Of<br />

course, in the palaeontological record, only protistids<br />

that secreted a skeleton or went through an encysting<br />

stage were normally fossilised. There were a number of<br />

encysting organisms, including acritarchs and dinoflagellates,<br />

but other protists secreted a calcareous skeleton<br />

(such as various forms of algae, including<br />

coccoliths, and foraminifera) or a siliceous skeleton<br />

(such as radiolaria and diatoms).<br />

Protista are important tools in the more applied side<br />

of palaeontology (biostratigraphy and palaeoenvironmental<br />

reconstruction). Dinoflagellate cysts are particularly<br />

useful in dating organic-rich rocks, in which they<br />

are found in abundance, and they have been particularly<br />

useful in hydrocarbons exploration. Coccoliths are<br />

also useful for biostratigraphical studies, particularly<br />

through the Mesozoic and into the Tertiary, while<br />

acritarchs and foraminifera can be used throughout the<br />

Palaeozoic and through to the Quaternary. The history<br />

of Radiolaria extends back into the Palaeozoic, but they<br />

are useful as biostratigraphical markers particularly in<br />

the Late Jurassic and in the Tertiary.<br />

Diatoms are useful in several respects. In some cases<br />

huge numbers of diatoms were deposited to form a sedimentary<br />

rock called a diatomite (with industrial applications<br />

in, for example, sugar refining, toothpaste<br />

manufacturing, as a mild abrasive and in paint production).<br />

However, their scientific application is in environmental<br />

reconstruction. Fresh water diatoms can be<br />

useful in monitoring the acidification of lakes as certain<br />

species are affected by pH. By logging the species present<br />

in sediments of different ages, it is possible to see<br />

the effects of industrial pollution.<br />

Algae are frequently single celled, but there are many<br />

instances where they are multicelled (seaweeds, for<br />

example). The single celled algae are generally considered<br />

to be protista, but the multicelled algae are sometimes<br />

considered to be members of the plant kingdom.<br />

Undoubtedly the earliest plants evolved from multicelled<br />

algae, probably the ‘green algae’, the chlorophytes,<br />

but the definition of the plant kingdom, must<br />

preclude them.<br />

Kingdom Plantae<br />

The plant kingdom comprises multi-celled, sexually<br />

reproducing eukaryotes that develop from an embryo<br />

(e.g. within a seed). The cell contains photosynthetic<br />

organelles called chloroplasts that contain chlorophyll,<br />

and its walls are composed of cellulose and pectins.<br />

With the appearance of the plant kingdom from their<br />

algal forebears, so spores and pollen became common<br />

microfossils. The earliest spores are Mid Ordovician in<br />

age (465-470 million years old) and probably produced<br />

by bryophytes. The earliest fossilised plants are vascular<br />

types (e.g. Cooksonia), which evolved in the Late Silurian.<br />

They rapidly diversified so that by the Carboniferous<br />

the first tropical rain forests had developed.<br />

One of the difficulties that need to be faced in<br />

palaeontology is where different parts of a single organism<br />

are given different names. This is seen in palaeobotany<br />

where the stem, leaf, root and pollen or spores of<br />

a single plant are given different names. Although the<br />

stems and leaves of plants do not fall within the definition<br />

of microfossils, the spores and pollen do.<br />

Spores and pollen are important microfossils for dating<br />

and correlating terrestrial, lacustrine and marginal<br />

marine sediments and for providing palaeoenvironmental<br />

information. An example of how pollen can be<br />

79 www.esta-uk.org


TEACHING EARTH SCIENCES ● Volume 27 ● Number 3, 2002<br />

used in palaeoenvironmental reconstruction comes<br />

from Eemian (Pleistocene) lake sediments of southern<br />

England. Pollen from sediment cores show that with<br />

the retreat of the ice, cold birch forests with abundant<br />

small herbs and shrubs were established. With continued<br />

amelioration pine colonised southern England and<br />

then as the climatic optimum approached, elm, oak,<br />

alder and hazel pollen began to appear in the sediments.<br />

Climatic deterioration then set in re-establishing first<br />

the pine forests and then the birch.<br />

Kingdom Fungi<br />

This kingdom contains eukaryotic organisms that<br />

reproduce by spores. Reproductive structures may be<br />

microscopic or macroscopic (mushrooms for example).<br />

Reproduction is mainly sexual, the hyphae fusing<br />

together, but a few produce only asexual spores.<br />

Whichever stratagem is used, the hyphal nuclei are haploid.<br />

However, they lack flagella in all phases of their<br />

life cycle. Fungi are aerobes and heterotrophs. They do<br />

not ingest food, but excrete enzymes that break down<br />

the food into molecules outside the organism, before<br />

absorbing it.<br />

Fossil spores and fruiting bodies of fungus have been<br />

found in rocks as old as the Devonian, although they are<br />

not widely studied and do not form an important element<br />

in the biostratigrapher’s armoury. I mention them<br />

here for completeness.<br />

Kingdom Animalia<br />

The animal kingdom comprises multicelled, eukaryotic<br />

organisms. They are heterotrophic (obtaining energy<br />

from organic compounds), diploid (cells with a nucleus<br />

containing two sets of chromosomes) and anisogamous<br />

(gametes of different morphology, ova and<br />

sperm). The diploid zygote develops by mitosis and<br />

forms an embryo resembling a hollow ball of cells<br />

(blastula) before progressing to the foetus. There are<br />

several microscopic members of the animal kingdom<br />

that are found as microfossils.<br />

Ostracods, for example, are small bivalved crustacea.<br />

The origin of ostracods is obscure because the soft bodies<br />

of some Cambrian ‘ostracods’ have occasionally<br />

been preserved intact, and prove that they are neither<br />

ostracods (as discussed by Mark Williams elsewhere in<br />

this volume p.89) nor, in some cases, crustacea. They<br />

have applications in biostratigraphy, but as different<br />

species live in a wide variety of environments, they are<br />

also useful in palaeoenvironmental reconstruction and<br />

modeling. Ostracods (together with Foraminifera) have<br />

been particularly useful in studying climate change.<br />

Different taxa have differing requirements and this can<br />

be used to model palaeoclimates. In addition, all species<br />

take up oxygen when forming their carapace during life<br />

and an oxygen isotope ‘finger print’ is left that can be<br />

used in palaeoenvironmental studies.<br />

In the Palaeozoic, it is not unusual to find organisms<br />

of uncertain affinity. Chitinozoa, for example, are<br />

extinct flask-shaped organisms that are said by some<br />

palaeontologists to have been related to foraminifera,<br />

others have suggested they are egg cases, and yet others<br />

considered to be related to an unknown animal. In fact<br />

nobody is certain what they are related to and they are<br />

often placed into ‘incertae sedis’.<br />

Another animal that has caused a great deal of scientific<br />

debate regarding its relationships is the conodont.<br />

These are found as small teeth-like structures in<br />

Palaeozoic rocks. Although first described as long ago as<br />

1856, it was not until 1983 that palaeontologists knew<br />

what the conodont animal looked like. These small<br />

teeth came from the mouth of an eel-like animal, possibly<br />

a distant relation of the hag fish. However, one of<br />

the fundamental problems in palaeontology is illustrated<br />

here. Different species and genera of conodont have<br />

been erected on the basis of the different morphologies<br />

of their tooth-like structures. Only when the whole<br />

animal was found did palaeontologists realise that different<br />

genera and species of conodont were found<br />

together in a single creature. A taxonomic can of worms<br />

was opened-what should the animal be called What<br />

genus should it be put in<br />

Conclusion<br />

Microscopic life began with the prokaryotic cell when<br />

monera evolved early in the <strong>Earth</strong>’s history. From these<br />

the eukaryotic cell evolved and with it the protista, a<br />

kingdom that experimented with multicellular body<br />

plans. Some protista show a relationship with plants<br />

(e.g. algae and dinoflagellates) and others with animals<br />

(e.g. foraminifera). It was from protista that the three<br />

other eukaryotic kingdoms evolved, plants, animals and<br />

fungi, all with microscopic representatives preserved as<br />

fossils (see Figure 1). A brief description of some of the<br />

more common types of microfossils are appended in a<br />

series of boxes.<br />

Microfossils are not only important from a taxonomic<br />

and evolutionary context, but they have important<br />

stratigraphical applications for mapping, surveying<br />

and coal or hydrocarbons exploration, where an understanding<br />

of correlation, tectonics, geometry and relationships<br />

of rock units is required. Some groups of<br />

microscopic taxa evolve rapidly, live for a short time<br />

before becoming extinct. Biostratigraphical dating of<br />

the geological record and the recognition of zones and<br />

subzones provides the geologist with a tight temporal<br />

control and a tool for correlating widely separated exposures<br />

and boreholes. Different species have a variety of<br />

environmental requirements so that microfossils are<br />

also useful in the study of palaeoenvironments and<br />

modeling aspects such as sea level change, climate<br />

change and conditions during sediment accumulation.<br />

www.esta-uk.org<br />

80


TEACHING EARTH SCIENCES ● Volume 27 ● Number 3, 2002<br />

Suggested Reading<br />

Although the literature is full of detailed scientific<br />

description, discussion and geological applications of<br />

microfossils, there are few books outlining microfossils<br />

in a general way. Those that have been written are<br />

becoming a little elderly and may be difficult to obtain<br />

outside a library, although a revision of Brasier’s book is<br />

in progress.<br />

Bignot, G. (1985) Elements of Micropalaeontology. 217pp.<br />

London: Graham & Trotman.<br />

Brasier, M.D. (1980) Microfossils. 193pp London:<br />

George Allen & Unwin.<br />

Haq, B.U. & Boersma, A.(1978) Introduction to Marine<br />

Micropaleontology. 376pp. New York: Elsevier.<br />

The following can be purchased through the BGS or any good bookshop.<br />

Wilkinson, I.P. (1996) Fossil Focus: Ostracoda. Nottingham: BGS.<br />

Wilkinson, I.P. (1997) Fossil Focus: Foraminifera. Nottingham: BGS.<br />

Acknowledgements<br />

I thank the following for assistance in illustrating this paper. Bacteria and<br />

blue-green bacteria were drawn by Chris Wardle. Photographs were taken<br />

by Mike Stephenson (pollen & spore), Jim Riding (dinoflagellate), Stewart<br />

Molyneux (chitinozoan and acritarch), Nick Riley (calcareous algae) and<br />

Mark Dean (conodont). Former members of staff of the BGS captured the<br />

images of the radiolarian and diatom (Murray Hughes) and coccoliths<br />

(Alan Medd). This paper is published with permission of the Director of<br />

the British Geological Survey (N.E.R.C.)<br />

Ian Wilkinson<br />

British Geological Survey<br />

Keyworth, Nottingham NG12 5GG<br />

Summary Charts<br />

Ostracoda<br />

Kingdom: Animal<br />

Chitinozoa<br />

Kingdom: Animal()<br />

Geological range:<br />

(Cambrian) Ordovician<br />

to Recent<br />

Geological range:<br />

Ordovician-Devonian<br />

Late Jurassic ostracod<br />

Ostracods are small crustacea that secrete a bi-valved,<br />

calcareous carapace. The hinge line along the dorsal margin<br />

may be a simple bar and groove or a series of teeth and<br />

sockets. The animal opens and closes the carapace with<br />

adductor muscles, the scars often being seen inside each<br />

valve. The surface of the carapace may be smooth or<br />

ornamented with punctation, reticulation, ribs and spines.<br />

Most ostracods are less than 1500 microns, although the<br />

largest is about 2.5 centimetres long. Ostracods are found in<br />

all aquatic environments from the deep sea to coastal rock<br />

pools, estuaries, ponds and lakes. They have even been<br />

found in trees of tropical rain forests where a small pools form<br />

in the leaves. Although they are not usually regarded as<br />

terrestrial animals, one genus has been found amongst leaf<br />

litter on wet, marshy ground. Fossil ostracods are particularly<br />

useful when making palaeoenvironmental reconstructions.<br />

I.P.Wilkinson (BGS)<br />

An Ordovician chitinozoan<br />

Chitinozoa are flask- or bottle-shaped organisms with a<br />

vesicle and an aperture at the end of a neck. They are<br />

sometimes found attached in chains. They may be smooth,<br />

hispid, tuberculate or spiny. They are usually 150-300<br />

microns long, but may be as small as 30 microns or as large<br />

as 1500 microns. The walls are made of chitin-like material<br />

and generally brown or black in colour. These extinct<br />

organisms are found in marine Palaeozoic rocks (especially<br />

shales and siltstones) and mainly those that accumulated in<br />

shallow, well oxygenated conditions. It is not unusual to<br />

find organisms of uncertain affinity in Palaeozoic deposits.<br />

The Chitinozoa is an example of this. Some palaeontologists<br />

believe that they were planktonic and probably zooplankton;<br />

others have suggested that they were related to<br />

foraminifera, and yet others consider them to be egg cases<br />

of an unknown animal.<br />

I.P.Wilkinson (BGS)<br />

81 www.esta-uk.org


TEACHING EARTH SCIENCES ● Volume 27 ● Number 3, 2002<br />

Bacteria<br />

Kingdom: Monera<br />

Blue green cyanobacteria<br />

Kingdom: Monera<br />

Geological range:<br />

Archaean to Recent<br />

Geological range:<br />

Archaean to Recent<br />

Precambrian bacteria<br />

Kingdom Monera is based on the prokaryote cell (they lack<br />

organelles, like mitochondria, and a nucleus with<br />

chromosomes). The most primitive would have been<br />

chemoautotrophs, adapted to the reducing conditions, but<br />

photautotrophs soon evolved. Some of the oldest known<br />

fossils were single cells less than 1 micron long, but others<br />

formed chains of cells (filaments), like those from the Apex<br />

Chert (3465Ma), or star-like arrangements e.g. Eoastrion<br />

from the Gun Flint Chert (2000 Ma). Bacillus-like<br />

Eobacterium are found in the Fig Tree Chert (3000Ma). These<br />

organisms formed Banded Ironstone Formations (BIFs).<br />

Oxygen given off by the bacteria caused ferrous iron in ocean<br />

water to oxidise and precipitated as a red layer of iron onto<br />

the sea floor. At times when oxygen was not being created,<br />

grey cherts were precipitated instead. These layers built up<br />

alternately to form BIFs.<br />

I.P.Wilkinson (BGS)<br />

Precambrian blue-green cyanobacteria<br />

Blue green cyanobacteria are found as fossils in<br />

Precambrian cherts, the oldest being from the 3400Ma old<br />

Towers Formation (Australia). Other examples come from the<br />

Fig Tree Chert and the Gun Flint Chert. These single-celled<br />

organisms may occur as single cells or form a chain of cells<br />

called a filament. Cells may be spheroidal, cylindrical or<br />

irregular. They photosynthesised, giving off oxygen as a<br />

waste product. In some places, vast numbers of blue green<br />

cyanobacteria formed a mat on the sea bed and by 3000Ma<br />

they were removing CaCO3 from the sea water during<br />

photosynthesis. Precipitation of these carbonates produced<br />

the first limestones. Mat upon mat were built up to form<br />

domes and mounds of limestone called stromatolites. 3000<br />

million years later they are still doing the same thing in<br />

Shark Bay, Australia.<br />

I.P.Wilkinson (BGS)<br />

Acritarchs<br />

Kingdom: Protista<br />

Dinoflagellates<br />

Kingdom: Protista<br />

Geological range:<br />

Precambrian to Pleistocene<br />

Geological range:<br />

Silurian, Late<br />

Triassic to Recent<br />

Early Ordovician acritarch<br />

Acritarchs are amongst the earliest protists. The oldest<br />

fossils are simple spherical cysts that first appear in shales<br />

1900-1600 million years old. Acritarchs are diverse and most<br />

abundant in rocks of Cambrian to Devonian age (c. 550 to 350<br />

million years ago). The cyst, which is up to about 150<br />

microns across, has a resistant wall that may be preserved as<br />

a fossil. Their exact affinities are unknown, but it is likely that<br />

many were marine phytoplankton, similar to dinoflagellates<br />

and some Prasinophyceae. If so, the organisms responsible<br />

for producing the cysts probably had a motile planktonic<br />

stage that encysted as a result of environmental stress or as<br />

part of their reproductive life cycle. Nothing is known of the<br />

motile stage, probably because it was composed of an organic<br />

compound like cellulose, which is less easily preserved.<br />

Jurassic dinoflagellate<br />

Dinoflagellates are single celled protistids. They are plantlike<br />

in having cellulose in the walls and chlorophyll pigments<br />

in the protoplasm, but animal-like having a motile phase with<br />

whip-like flagella to provide propulsion through ocean<br />

waters. The hard envelope (theca) comprises a number of<br />

plates and contains the large nucleus and chromoplasts. Like<br />

acritarchs, during periods of adverse environmental<br />

conditions or after reproduction, they have a ‘resting stage’<br />

when they encyst. But, unlike acritarchs, the plates of the<br />

theca are retained in the cyst stage. Cysts, the only part that<br />

is fossilized, are 20-150 microns across, and may be smooth<br />

or ornamented with spines, ridges and granules. When<br />

improved conditions returned, the dinoflagellate escapes<br />

their cyst through a hole (archaeopyle) in the wall, made by<br />

discarding one of the plates.<br />

I.P.Wilkinson (BGS)<br />

I.P.Wilkinson (BGS)<br />

www.esta-uk.org<br />

82


TEACHING EARTH SCIENCES ● Volume 27 ● Number 3, 2002<br />

Coccolithophores<br />

Geological range:<br />

(Precambrian)<br />

Late Triassic to Recent<br />

Kingdom: Protista<br />

Foraminifera<br />

Geological range:<br />

Cambrian to Recent<br />

Kingdom: Protista<br />

Jurassic coccoliths<br />

Coccolithophores are chrysophytes, unicellular and<br />

planktonic, with two flagella for locomotion. Of the c. 2000<br />

species, all but four live in normal marine salinities (three live<br />

in fresh waters and one in high salinities of the Dead Sea).<br />

They require well oxygenated waters and live within the top<br />

50m of the water column in order to photosynthesise.<br />

Between 10 and 30 tiny (3 to 15 microns) calcareous plates<br />

(coccoliths) envelope the organism in a cyst-like coccosphere.<br />

On death, the coccosphere breaks up into coccoliths and, with<br />

diagenesis, these often break up into component crystals.<br />

Coccoliths and their debris comprise over 90% of the<br />

Cretaceous chalk of Britain. Coccolithophores are important<br />

in our environment today as they remove carbon dioxide, a<br />

greenhouse gas, by trapping it in their calcareous (CaCO3)<br />

skeletons on the ocean floor. They are sometimes so<br />

abundant that they form a coccolith ooze.<br />

I.P.Wilkinson (BGS)<br />

Late Jurassic Foraminifer<br />

Foraminifera are sometimes called ‘armoured amoeba’. The<br />

amoeba-like cell engulfs a tiny shell (test) that may be<br />

composed of calcite, aragonite or sand or silt grains cemented<br />

together by a calcite or silica cement. The test may be a<br />

single globular or tubular chamber; a string of chambers; a<br />

coiled arrangement of chambers or a mixture of these. They<br />

are often found fossilised. Most species are less than 1mm<br />

across, but the largest of these single celled organisms was<br />

over 10 cm in length. Foraminifera are confined to marine and<br />

brackish waters and extend into estuaries and marshes, but<br />

are not found in fresh water. Some are planktonic, while<br />

others are benthonic. They have a complex reproductive<br />

strategy so that alternating generations occur; an organism<br />

which was the result of sexual reproduction, will in turn<br />

reproduce asexually.<br />

I.P.Wilkinson (BGS)<br />

Radiolaria<br />

Kingdom: Protista<br />

Diatoms<br />

Kingdom: Protista<br />

Geological range:<br />

Cambrian to Recent<br />

Geological range:<br />

Jurassic,<br />

Cretaceous to Recent<br />

Eocene radiolarian<br />

Radiolaria are planktonic actinopods, heterotrophic protista<br />

that secrete a skeleton of between 100 and 2000 microns.<br />

The composition of the skeleton may be strontium sulphate or<br />

opaline silica. The latter, which dominate the fossil record,<br />

form two large groups. Spumularia, which evolved during the<br />

Ordovician, are radially symmetrical, often spherical or<br />

discoidal, with radial spines. Nassellaria, which developed at<br />

the beginning of the Mesozoic, are elongate and axially<br />

symmetrical, being elongate, ellipsoidal, discoidal or fusiform<br />

and often spinose. They live in tropical marine waters<br />

especially at depths of 100 to 500m. They remain buoyant in<br />

the water by using fat globules; gas-filled vacuoles; long rigid,<br />

thread-like axopods on spines; and by having perforated<br />

skeletons to reduce weight. Reproduction is asexual.<br />

Palaeogene diatom<br />

Diatoms are autotrophic, unicellular algae. They occur in the<br />

photic zone of oceans, estuaries, lakes and ponds. The part<br />

that is fossilised is the opaline silica shell (or frustule),<br />

which comprise two valves that fit together rather like a pillbox.<br />

The frustule may be up to about 2mm across and some<br />

forms are colonial, forming long chains. There are two large<br />

groups of fossil diatoms: the radially symmetrical Centrales,<br />

which evolved during the mid Cretaceous, and the more<br />

elongate, bilaterally symmetrical Pennales which appeared<br />

in the Eocene. They may occur in huge numbers on the<br />

ocean floor to form an ooze. In some cases when huge<br />

numbers of diatoms accumulated they formed a sedimentary<br />

rock called a diatomite. One Miocene diatomite in America is<br />

1000m thick and there are an estimated 6,000,000 frustules<br />

per cubic centimeter!<br />

I.P.Wilkinson (BGS)<br />

I.P.Wilkinson (BGS)<br />

83 www.esta-uk.org


TEACHING EARTH SCIENCES ● Volume 27 ● Number 3, 2002<br />

Green Algae<br />

(Chlorophyta)<br />

Geological range:<br />

Late Silurian to Recent<br />

Kingdom: Protista<br />

Pollen & Spores<br />

Geological range:<br />

Ordovician to Recent<br />

Kingdom: Plant<br />

Carboniferous calcareous algae<br />

Chlorophytes are ‘Green Algae’, with chlorophyll in their<br />

cells. Prasinophyceae have spherical cells, 100 to 700<br />

microns across, and an organic wall with small plate-like<br />

scales. Range: Cambrian to Recent. Chlorophycae have a<br />

large central vacuole surrounded by protoplasm. They may<br />

be unicellular or multicellular. Eosphaera is an example<br />

from the Precambrian. Some (Dasycladales and Siphonales)<br />

are spherical, cylindrical or branched and secrete a skeleton<br />

of aragonite, which becomes calcite during fossilisation.<br />

Charophycae are plant-like algae (‘stonewort’) that grow up<br />

to 2m high. Amongst the branches are small (500-750<br />

microns) male (antheridia) and female (oogonia) organs.<br />

The former is rarely fossilised, but the latter is an ovoid<br />

body, with a spiral ornament that may be found in lacustrine<br />

and estuarine deposits.<br />

I.P.Wilkinson (BGS)<br />

Pollen (top) & Spore (bottom) from the Permian<br />

Spores and pollen appeared when the plant kingdom evolved<br />

from its algal origin in the Ordovician. Spores from primitive<br />

plants (e.g. bryophytes, Cooksoni and Rhynia) were windblown<br />

and, if they landed in suitably moist soils, grew into a<br />

gametophyte plant, bearing both male and female cells. More<br />

advanced plants (e.g. clubmosses and horse tails), which<br />

evolved in the mid-Devonian, gave rise to microspores (20-50<br />

microns), that grew into male gametophytes, and megaspores<br />

(200-400 microns), that became female gametophytes.<br />

During the Late Palaeozoic, plants living in drier areas<br />

“imprisoned” the megaspore in a capsule where it developed<br />

further, eventually dividing into a few cells. The single celled<br />

microspores evolved into multicelled pollen grains (the male<br />

gametophyte), which fertilised the encapsulated female.<br />

Gymnosperms (e.g. seed-ferns, cycads and conifers) and<br />

flower-bearing angiosperms reproduced in this way.<br />

I.P.Wilkinson (BGS)<br />

Spores & Fruiting bodies<br />

Geological range:<br />

Devonian to Recent<br />

Kingdom: Fungi<br />

Conodontophorida<br />

Kingdom: Animal<br />

Geological range:<br />

Early Cambrian to late Triassic<br />

Fruiting body (left) & spore (right) of Palaeogene fungi<br />

Fungi are known to have evolved by the Devonian, although<br />

their early history is relatively poorly known. Spores and<br />

fruiting bodies have been found in the fossil record, but have<br />

been little studied. They have little known biostratigraphical<br />

or palaeoenvironmental value and have generally been<br />

ignored by palaeontologists.<br />

Platform (top) and compound (bottom) conodonts from the Carboniferous<br />

Conodonts are small teeth-like structures, generally 100 to<br />

2000 microns in length, but occasionally up to 5000 microns.<br />

They are made of calcium phosphate. Conodonts may be a<br />

simple, individual tooth, a compound ‘blade’ composed of a<br />

series teeth or a row of teeth attached to a ledge-like<br />

platform. They are found in Palaeozoic rocks, particularly<br />

limestones. Although first described as long ago as 1856, it<br />

was not until 1983 that palaeontologists new what the<br />

conodont animal looked like. These teeth came from the<br />

mouth of a eel-like fish, possibly a distant relation of the hag<br />

fish. But here was a problem. Different species and genera of<br />

conodonts had been erected for the different morphologies.<br />

Only when the whole animal was found did paleontologists<br />

realise that different genera and species were found together<br />

in the mouth of a single individual.<br />

I.P.Wilkinson (BGS)<br />

I.P.Wilkinson (BGS)<br />

www.esta-uk.org<br />

84


Winter 2002 ● Issue 39<br />

ENVIRONMENTAL<br />

IMPACTS – 3<br />

RIVERS<br />

Published by the <strong>Earth</strong> <strong>Science</strong> Teachers’ <strong>Association</strong> Registered Charity No. 1005331<br />

Introduction<br />

This is the third in a series of PEST’s concerning Environmental Impacts (1 and 2 were from space<br />

and from Volcanoes). This one concentrates on the environmental impact that rivers can have for a<br />

variety of reasons.<br />

Most of this relates to aspects of the Geography curriculum and covers knowledge and<br />

understanding of patterns and processes (Ga 4); Knowledge and understanding of<br />

environmental change and sustainable development (Ga5) and Breadth of Study – Themes (Ga<br />

6, c, d, e,). It can be linked into a variety of topic work particularly when studying any aspects of<br />

settlement and/or rivers.<br />

Many people do not realize the positive and often underlying environmental impact of a river such<br />

as the reasons for a settlement having been established where it is, but are more aware of the<br />

negative aspects such as flooding, pollution, disease, subsidence and drought.<br />

One point that is often forgotten is that flooding is natural and is the way a river copes with excess<br />

water. The flood plain is the flat area around a river channel that becomes flooded.<br />

This issue provides ideas of where and how to include the environmental impacts that rivers have<br />

from both a positive and a negative view.<br />

It includes information about the effects of rivers on its environment, how we make use of rivers<br />

and the effect this has, also the effect rivers have on our activities and how we live.


WINTER 2002 ● Issue 39 ● ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS - 3: RIVERS<br />

Accentuate the Positive !!!<br />

Settlements<br />

Settlements grew up beside rivers because: -<br />

There was easy access to water which is vital to human life<br />

There was fertile land<br />

There was water to grow crops<br />

There may have been a crossing point of the river<br />

There may have been access by water to other settlements<br />

There was easy access to water for industrial purposes<br />

The above ideas can be used when investigating a “place” in geography.<br />

All early settlements needed water to drink and thus were often near to a river or stream.<br />

The flood plains around rivers, also called alluvial plains, were also fertile land, which enabled<br />

settlers to grow crops, there was also water there to irrigate the crops.<br />

If the river had a shallow area where it could be crossed, the area was likely to attract travellers<br />

who might then also want to trade with the settlers.<br />

If the river was navigable then travellers might stop off to trade, or it would be easy for the settlers<br />

to visit other settlements to trade.<br />

If the river were suitable it could be used for industrial purposes, in earlier days this could have<br />

been a water mill, which could have provided flour for the settlement. In more recent times this<br />

light have been in the form of using the water for cooling purposes at a power station or even<br />

providing power in the form of Hydro electric power where the river flow was sufficient.<br />

Eliminate the Negative<br />

Flooding<br />

When a river floods it is because there is too much water being carried within the river channel.<br />

This may be due to excessive rainfall over a short period of time, or a sudden thaw of snow and ice<br />

or even a burst dam.<br />

Floodplains, narrow valleys and coastal areas are the most likely areas to be affected, with coastal<br />

areas (particularly low lying ones) more at risk than inland ones.<br />

As floodwater travels downstream it can become very dangerous depending on the amount of<br />

water involved, the debris it collects and the area it is flowing through.<br />

When a river bursts its banks in a rural area fields are flooded and often the only creatures at risk<br />

are animals. However crops can also be damaged by the floodwater, as can communications, with<br />

roads, railways and bridges being underwater and sometimes permanently damaged. Land can<br />

remain waterlogged for long periods of time in some cases with farmers’ livelihoods being put at<br />

risk. Where a flood is severe trees can be uprooted.


WINTER 2002 ● Issue 39 ● ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS - 3: RIVERS<br />

In urban areas there is often far more damage, towns can become flooded, houses and vehicles<br />

damaged and lives can be at risk. Where a flood is severe buildings and vehicles can be washed<br />

away and this debris cause even more damage.<br />

Where a potential hazard from flooding is known river defences are sometimes built to prevent<br />

floodwater reaching habited areas, but these do not always prevent flooding. Sometimes these<br />

defences cause as many problems as they solve, such as the levees built on the Mississippi in the<br />

USA. These are huge banks of earth on either side of the river, which were intended to contain the<br />

river when it flooded. These were however not enough to contain the summer floods in 1993,<br />

which followed an excessively wet summer.<br />

Dams are also used to regulate river flow on those rivers prone to flooding such as Clywedog Dam<br />

at Llandiloes on the River Severn. Flood defences in the UK are the responsibility of the<br />

Environmental Agency.<br />

Pollution<br />

Pollution after flooding can be as a result of floodwaters being polluted by sewage and other<br />

contaminated waste such as from industrial areas, plus fuel storage sites.<br />

However another form of pollution can be caused when industrial waste is released into a river by<br />

accident and causes pollution downstream, damaging wildlife and fish. Water is also taken from a<br />

river to be used for industrial purposes.<br />

Disease<br />

Due to pollution that occurs as above disease can sometimes cause more loss of life than the<br />

floods that preceded it. This is more often the case in underdeveloped areas where the water<br />

supplies may become polluted and cause diseases such as dysentery.<br />

Subsidence<br />

In certain types of areas, particularly those underlain by limestone, subsidence is the result of<br />

flooding. Landslides are also a hazard, and can be as dangerous as the flood water itself.<br />

Drought<br />

You may wonder why we have included this here, but drought can have just as dramatic effect on<br />

the environment, and can greatly affect river flow. In areas where there is a lock of rain a river<br />

becomes a vital source of water, however the drought itself can also cause the river volume to<br />

decrease and can affect crops and health.


WINTER 2002 ● Issue 39 ● ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS - 3: RIVERS<br />

Activities<br />

Making a Flood<br />

Build a river, using an old slide or plastic gutter and a mixture of sand and gravel (see instructions<br />

in PEST 16). Demonstrate normal flow then increase the volume of water flowing to show the<br />

difference that a large amount of water makes to a river. Ask children to predict which areas will be<br />

safe by placing plasticine blocks where they think houses will not be affected.<br />

Field Work.<br />

When studying rivers it is of course ideal to be able to visit a local on. Even a small stream can<br />

provide a good source for research. Ideally visit it at different times during the year so that the<br />

children can see the difference between a low volume summer river and a high volume winter river.<br />

Photographic records are very useful to remind children of what they have seen previously and to<br />

compare findings. Children can measure the depth and width of the river using metre sticks and<br />

tape measure, as well as the rate of flow using a floating object, metre stick and a stop watch Care<br />

should always be taken when doing work of this kind.<br />

Planning a New Town or Village<br />

Give the children a map of an appropriate area with a river, flood plain etc: and ask them to plan<br />

where they would build a new town or village. They need to give reasons why they have placed it<br />

where they have and why they have not sited it in other parts of the area.<br />

Planning A Factory Site<br />

Give the children a map of an appropriate area with a river, flood plain etc: You could use the same<br />

one as in the previous activity, or you might like to use one with a town or village already on it. Ask<br />

the children to plan where to site a new factory which will either have waste products which, after<br />

treatment, could be discharged into the river or requires the use of water from the river. Remind<br />

the children that they need to take into account other people or industries in the area, and the<br />

effect the new industry might have on them.<br />

Linking to Work on Ancient Egypt in History.<br />

Whilst doing work on Ancient Egypt or just afterwards investigate the River Nile. Cover the fact that<br />

in ancient times the natural flooding of the River Nile was used to aid irrigation of crops as well as<br />

providing fertile land to grow them on. Although this also led to problems for the population.<br />

Contrast this with the fact that in more recent times this flooding has been prevented following the<br />

building of dams on the river, which has meant that life is easier, but has meant that water has not<br />

been available in the same way for irrigation of crops and other means have had to be found.<br />

COPYRIGHT<br />

There is no copyright on original material published in<br />

<strong>teaching</strong> Primary <strong>Earth</strong> <strong>Science</strong> if it is required for<br />

<strong>teaching</strong> in the classroom. Copyright materials<br />

reproduced by permission of other publications rests<br />

with the original publishers.<br />

To reproduce original material from P.E.S.T. in other<br />

publications permission must be sought from the <strong>Earth</strong><br />

<strong>Science</strong> Primary working group via: Peter York, at the<br />

address below.<br />

This issue was devised and written by Niki Whitburn and<br />

edited by Graham Kitts.<br />

TO SUBSCRIBE TO: TEACHING PRIMARY EARTH SCIENCE<br />

send £5.00 made payable to ESTA.<br />

c/o Mr P York,<br />

346 Middlewood Road North,<br />

Oughtibridge,<br />

Sheffield S35 0HF


TEACHING EARTH SCIENCES ● Volume 27 ● Number 3, 2002<br />

The Stone Tapes: Building Stones in the<br />

History of the City of Nottingham<br />

GRAHAM LOTT<br />

From my days as a newly qualified geologist I still have a strong memory of an old BBC TV drama<br />

production called the Stone Tape. The main premise of the storyline was that the historic events<br />

that had occurred within a particular house were recorded in the stones of its walls and that these<br />

stories could, in the right circumstances, be ‘replayed’ in the present. To a great extent my<br />

subsequent career in geology, like that of many other geologists, has been spent in trying to<br />

understand the geological stories ‘recorded and told’ by such stones through studying their<br />

mineralogy and physical characteristics. Many of the techniques I learned I then found could be<br />

applied to the identification of the stones used in buildings and other structures. This has<br />

allowed me to take the story of the stones one step further by integrating their geological story<br />

with the history and origins of the buildings.<br />

The City of Nottingham, like most other cities<br />

in Britain, fortunately still has many such significant<br />

stories to tell through its stone buildings,<br />

despite the tribulations brought about by the sometimes<br />

catastrophic redevelopments of the 1960’s, 70’s<br />

and 80’s. Today, enlightened planners and architects<br />

have realised that conserving rather than demolishing<br />

historic buildings and landscapes has resulted in much<br />

more attractive and friendly city centre environments.<br />

Any study of building stones and their sources is<br />

very much intertwined with the development of first<br />

local, and later national transportation systems within<br />

an area (Lott 2001; BGS 2000). Throughout its history<br />

Nottingham has always taken full advantage of its position<br />

on one of the country’s major waterways, the River<br />

Trent. Its early development was very much reliant on<br />

the wealth generated from this river traffic. The river<br />

carried raw materials, like coal, lead, iron and stone,<br />

items too heavy for the existing overland trackways and<br />

embryonic road systems, from the mines and quarries<br />

of Derbyshire and north Nottinghamshire to the<br />

Humber estuary and beyond. Much of the building<br />

material that was needed for such a rapidly expanding<br />

city was imported using this river system which, from<br />

the late 18th century, was considerably improved by a<br />

series of local canal networks.<br />

As is typical of many cities, much of the older<br />

stonework is of local origin. The oldest stone buildings<br />

still surviving are the medieval churches of St Peter and<br />

St Mary. Though both have been much restored and<br />

added to over the centuries, the recently cleaned spire and<br />

surviving early stone fabric of St Peter’s, and the tower of<br />

St Mary’s, are constructed of large blocks of fine-grained<br />

sandstone from the local Triassic Sherwood Sandstone<br />

Group. The original quarries are now lost in the suburban<br />

developments of Sneinton and Gedling but they,<br />

together with quarries at Castle Donnington and Weston<br />

on Trent, sited just upstream on either side of the Trent,<br />

supplied a considerable amount of stone to the city until<br />

at least the late 18th century. Stone from these quarries is<br />

particularly well displayed in the Shire Hall (1770) (Galleries<br />

of Justice Museum), comprising large blocks of<br />

greenish or reddish-grey, cross-bedded sandstone, pockmarked<br />

by the erosion of the soft clay clasts that often<br />

characterise these fluvial, Triassic sandstones.<br />

The city is still dominated by its castle sitting high on<br />

St Mary’s Church:<br />

Local Triassic and<br />

Carboniferous<br />

Sandstones<br />

Shire Hall:<br />

Local Triassic<br />

sandstone.<br />

Mansfield Red<br />

pilasters<br />

85 www.esta-uk.org


TEACHING EARTH SCIENCES ● Volume 27 ● Number 3, 2002<br />

the ridge of Triassic sandstone that divides the city.<br />

This sandstone has, unfortunately, always proved to be<br />

too poorly cemented to provide good building stone<br />

and was more widely utilised in the creation of the<br />

warren of man-made caves that underlie much of the<br />

urban area (Charsley et al. 1990; Waltham 1996) and<br />

which much later encouraged the construction of the<br />

Nottingham via the Trent. This finer grained, sandy Permian<br />

dolomitic limestone is now only found in a few surviving<br />

buildings in the city. The Mansfield White variety,<br />

with its characteristic green clay seams, can be seen in the<br />

Nottingham Corn Exchange (1849-50) in Thurland<br />

Street and in the old Chapel (1815) on George Street.<br />

The more ferruginous Mansfield Red variety was much<br />

St Andrew’s<br />

Church:<br />

Bulwell<br />

Golden Stone<br />

(Magnesian<br />

Limestone),<br />

Ancaster<br />

Limestone quoins<br />

and mouldings,<br />

grey Lias<br />

limestone arches<br />

Wollaton Hall:<br />

Ancaster Stone<br />

many railway tunnels that cross-cut the city. Little<br />

appears to remain of the stonework of the original<br />

medieval castle, which figured so prominently in the<br />

city’s early history. What does remain, however, suggests<br />

that a considerable amount of local Permian<br />

dolomitic limestone together with assorted Carboniferous<br />

and Triassic sandstones, were used in its construction<br />

(Drage 1990). The present italianate ‘castle’<br />

(1674), built for the Duke of Newcastle was largely<br />

destroyed by fire in 1831. Today’s castle, restored by T.<br />

C. Hine (see above) survives as a Museum of Art and<br />

is built of strongly cross-bedded Carboniferous sandstone<br />

probably from nearby Derbyshire quarries, to the<br />

west, around Trowell, Stanton or Little Eaton.<br />

The most commonly seen stone within the city is the<br />

local Permian magnesian or dolomitic limestone (Cadeby<br />

Formation) from the Bulwell quarries (Bulwell Golden<br />

Stone), now also engulfed within the city’s northern<br />

suburbs. They provided stone for many Victorian industrial<br />

buildings, numerous churches (St Andrew (1869-<br />

71); Goldsmith St.) and schools (Nottingham High<br />

School (1866-7); Arboretum St.). This distinctive,<br />

coarsely crystalline, pale yellow-brown, dolomitic limestone<br />

formed the basis of a major local industry from at<br />

least the 16th century, but particularly flourished in the<br />

19th century. Not well suited for carved work, Bulwell<br />

Stone was often used as a wall stone together with pale<br />

yellow, Middle Jurassic Lincolnshire Limestone for the<br />

dressed quoins, window and door mouldings (All<br />

Saint’s Church (1863-4); Raleigh Street)<br />

In 1796 the Chesterfield Canal linked the Permian<br />

magnesian limestone quarries of the Mansfield area with<br />

sought after, both locally and nationally, for decorative<br />

stonework and often found in the door and window<br />

mouldings of larger houses and shop fronts.<br />

The Roman Foss Dyke that links Lincoln to the<br />

Trent provided the distant Ancaster quarries with<br />

access to Nottingham and, just outside the city centre,<br />

Wollaton Hall (1580-88), home of the coal magnate<br />

Francis Willoughby. Designed by Robert Smythson it<br />

was constructed largely of Ancaster Stone, together<br />

with some finer grained, Cadeby Formation dolomitic<br />

limestone, the former transported no doubt by using<br />

this ancient waterway to reach first the Trent and then<br />

Nottingham beyond.<br />

The gradual replacement of local stone by varieties<br />

imported from further afield, fuelled by the increasing<br />

industrial development in the city, reached its climax<br />

in the mid-late 19th century with the gradual establishment<br />

of the local rail network. Quickly replacing<br />

the canals as the best means for transporting heavy<br />

goods, and driven by the demands of many innovative<br />

Victorian architects, a wide range of new building<br />

stones and other building materials began to appear in<br />

the city. Most commonly, buildings of this period in<br />

the city show an increasing use of Derbyshire Carboniferous<br />

sandstones as in the solidly built old GPO<br />

Buildings (1895; Queen’s St.) and former Bank<br />

buildings (c.1872; Victoria St.), the latter mixing buff<br />

coloured sandstone with oolitic and shelly, Middle<br />

Jurassic, Lincolnshire Limestone.<br />

Leaving aside the legends of Robin Hood, the city of<br />

Nottingham is perhaps most-famed for its lace production.<br />

The industry still survives and was, in it heyday,<br />

www.esta-uk.org<br />

86


TEACHING EARTH SCIENCES ● Volume 27 ● Number 3, 2002<br />

housed close to the city centre in an area now known as<br />

the Lace Market. There has been considerable thought to<br />

the conservation of the numerous mill buildings that<br />

survive in this area and perhaps the jewel in the crown is<br />

the Adams Building (1855; now Clarendon College).<br />

The power, wealth and occasionally benevolent<br />

nature of some local Victorian mill owners in this<br />

industry is showcased in this recently restored building.<br />

T. C. Hine the architect designed an imposing<br />

entrance-way of ornately carved, pale yellow oolitic<br />

Lincolnshire Limestone (Ancaster Stone), with the<br />

street levels faced with harder, coarse grained Carboniferous<br />

sandstone from the Millstone Grit of Derbyshire.<br />

Inside, Adams provided a chapel and school for his<br />

workforce. The need for each mill owner to display his<br />

success through commissioning such exceptional<br />

buildings is clearly evident in the area.<br />

Like most Victorian cities local architects have played<br />

an important role in shaping the character of the city<br />

through their buildings. Nottingham had two such<br />

luminaries, Thomas C. Hine and Watson Fothergill.<br />

Hine from the early part of the 19th Century dominated<br />

the building contracts within the city. He often favoured<br />

brick but invariably used local stone for the more decorative<br />

parts of his designs, as in the Adams Building. As<br />

architect to the Duke of Newcastle Estate which included<br />

the castle, his influence is everywhere in the city. Watson<br />

Fothergill dominated the city’s architecture over the<br />

latter part of the century producing a far more flamboyant,<br />

polychromatic, architectural style. Strongly influenced<br />

by the gothic works of Burges and Street, many of<br />

his multifaceted buildings still survive. He used Derbyshire<br />

buff and grey Carboniferous sandstones, Mansfield<br />

Red dolomitic limestone, Upper Jurassic Portland<br />

Stone and a variety of Scottish granites in his Nottingham<br />

Express 1876 (Upper Parliament St.) and former<br />

National Westminster Bank 1877-82 (Thurland St.)<br />

buildings, which both typify his style.<br />

Better known nationally Augustus Welby Pugin,<br />

jointly with Charles Barry architect of the Palace of<br />

Westminster, was contracted to design the impressive,<br />

but very much plainer, St Barnabas (1841-4), Nottingham’s<br />

R. C. Cathedral. He used the local, greybrown<br />

Stancliffe Darley Dale (Ashover Grit) sandstone<br />

from Derbyshire.<br />

Industrial progress, particularly at the breakneck<br />

pace of the late 19th century was not without a price. As<br />

elsewhere the effects of coal-fired pollution had soiled<br />

and blackened many of the stone buildings in the city.<br />

In order to counteract these effects some architects,<br />

notably Alfred Waterhouse, began to use colourful<br />

glazed terracotta blocks that were thought to be more<br />

impervious to the pollutants. Waterhouse’s Prudential<br />

building (1896; King St.) in red terracotta with his characteristic<br />

animal casts and the bronzed Art Nouveau<br />

style of the shop front (1904; High Street) are just two<br />

of many such examples in the city.<br />

Growing Victorian cities like Nottingham were<br />

Adams Building:<br />

Ancaster Stone<br />

with Carboniferous<br />

Sandstone<br />

Nottingham<br />

Express Building:<br />

Carboniferous<br />

sandstone;<br />

Mansfield Red<br />

decoration<br />

87 www.esta-uk.org


TEACHING EARTH SCIENCES ● Volume 27 ● Number 3, 2002<br />

Arkwright<br />

Building:<br />

Ancaster Stone<br />

often conscious of their image and liked to portray not<br />

only their industrial success through their buildings but<br />

also their concerns for other aspects of everyday life<br />

such as the educational well being of their population.<br />

In 1881 the University College of Nottingham was<br />

founded and a new prestigious building was constructed<br />

in pseudo-gothic style (Arkwright Building (1888);<br />

Shakespeare St.) of Ancaster Stone. Although the University<br />

has subsequently moved to its present site outside<br />

the city centre the buildings now form part of the new<br />

city centre Nottingham Trent University campus.<br />

The last substantial classical style stone building to<br />

be constructed in the city was the new Council House<br />

(1927-29). The architect (T.C. Howitt) used white,<br />

oolitic Portland Stone to clad its immense iron framework.<br />

Portland Stone, from Dorset, subsequently<br />

became a common feature in many office buildings in<br />

this and many other UK cities during this period. It was<br />

also used in the new University Park buildings when<br />

the supply of its chosen sandstone, Darley Dale, proved<br />

unreliable and again in the Nottingham Trent University<br />

Newton buildings in the 1950’s.<br />

Today, the stories being told by the stones tell us yet<br />

again how transport systems have further evolved. Blue<br />

Pearl Larvikite and migmatite imported from Norway;<br />

travertine limestones and marbles from Italy; granites<br />

from India are all showcased in the city’s newer buildings<br />

and shopping malls. However, fewer and fewer<br />

stone buildings are being constructed of local stones.<br />

An encouraging exception is the Crown Court (1985;<br />

Canal St.) building constructed of pinkish, Carboniferous<br />

Birchover Sandstone from Derbyshire. The focus<br />

has now turned to preserving and utilising the built<br />

heritage of the city. As part of this process it essential not<br />

only in Nottingham, but elsewhere in the country, to<br />

continue to record and interpret the ‘messages’ being<br />

broadcast by our many surviving stone buildings, messages<br />

which are still, unfortunately, often being ignored.<br />

Some of these ‘stone tapes’ are in need of ‘re-recording’<br />

to pass on to new audiences before either they are<br />

irreparably damaged by inappropriate conservation<br />

techniques (Kennet 2001) or wiped clean forever (Harris<br />

1999). These ‘stone tapes’ form a major part of our<br />

built heritage and can tell us far more than just their<br />

geological history.<br />

References<br />

BGS (2000) Building Stone Resources of the United<br />

Kingdom (BGS Map 1:1,000,000 Scale).<br />

Charsley, T.J., Rathbone, P.A. and Lowe, D.J. (1990)<br />

Nottingham: A geological background to planning and<br />

development. British Geological Survey Technical<br />

Report WA/90/1<br />

Drage, C. (1990) Nottingham Castle. A Place Full Royal.<br />

Published by Nottingham Civic Society and the<br />

Thoroton Society of Nottinghamshire.<br />

Harris, J. (1999) No Voice from the Hall - Early Memories<br />

of a Country House Snooper. London: Joh Murrray.<br />

Kennet, P. (2002) Chemistry in the High Street.<br />

Teaching <strong>Earth</strong> <strong>Science</strong>s,<br />

27 (1), pp. 7-8.<br />

Lott, G.K. and Cobbing, J. (1996) Nottingham.<br />

Heritage in Stone. BGS <strong>Earth</strong>wise Publication.<br />

Lott, G.K. (2001) Geology and building stones in the<br />

East Midlands. Mercian Geologist, 15, pp. 97-122.<br />

Waltham, T. (1996) Sandstone Caves of Nottingham.<br />

East Midlands Geological Society.<br />

Published with the permission of the Director, British<br />

Geological Survey (NERC).<br />

Graham Lott<br />

British Geological Survey<br />

Keyworth<br />

Nottingham NG12 5GG<br />

www.esta-uk.org<br />

88


TEACHING EARTH SCIENCES ● Volume 27 ● Number 3, 2002<br />

Lost worlds:<br />

How Exceptional Fossils Reveal the Past<br />

MARK WILLIAMS<br />

Fossils constitute amazing evidence of lost worlds and this article provides four ‘snapshots’ of<br />

how they contribute to major scientific debates in the biological and geological sciences. The<br />

fossil ‘snapshots’ are: a half billion year old animal from Shropshire, fossilized in 3-dimensions<br />

with its soft anatomy, that indicates the presence of modern animal body plans in the Cambrian;<br />

small fossil crustaceans from the Ordovician of the American Midwest, which appear in Scotland,<br />

indicating the ancient geographical disposition of the continents; fossil mouthparts from the<br />

Moffat district, that identify predators in the Silurian marine abyss; and microfossil assemblages<br />

from ancient marine deposits of the Pacific Ocean that identify tsunamis. Fossils provide<br />

examples of the evolution of organisms and the biosphere from the Precambrian to the present.<br />

They can determine the positions of ancient continents and help to reconstruct complex ancient<br />

ecologies. Fossils can even be used to ‘fingerprint’ tsunami deposits and identify potential<br />

geological hazards.<br />

A half billion year old relative of crabs and lobsters<br />

In the ancient rocks of Shropshire are tiny fossilized<br />

marine animals only 0.3mm long, preserved with their<br />

entire soft anatomy (see Figures 1 and 2). So fine is the<br />

preservation that the animals even display the hairs on<br />

their legs. This would be amazing if they were one million<br />

years old. But in this case the fossils are from rocks<br />

deposited over half a billion years ago.<br />

The tiny fossils are bivalved crustaceans. Their head<br />

appendages are arranged in the same manner as that of<br />

modern crabs, lobsters and crayfish, with two pairs of<br />

antennae at the front, mandibles and maxillae (see Figure<br />

2). At over 511 million years old these are the<br />

grandfather of all tempura!<br />

The animals come from the Comley Limestones of<br />

1a<br />

Shropshire, part of the Lower Cambrian sequence of<br />

rocks that were deposited in a shallow sea at the margin<br />

of the early Palaeozoic marine Welsh Basin. They are<br />

the oldest complete animals preserved in 3-dimensions<br />

ever found. This kind of preservation is astonishing, as<br />

most fossils preserve only the hard shell or skeletal tissues.<br />

Coated in the mineral phosphate, the Shropshire<br />

animals were virtually ‘mummified’ alive, or preserved<br />

almost immediately after death. Either way, there was<br />

no chance for the decay of soft anatomy.<br />

The fossils are amazing in themselves, encased in<br />

limestone they waited half a billion years to be released<br />

from the rock by acid processing techniques in the laboratory.<br />

But their wider evolutionary significance is<br />

much greater, given that they occur in Lower Cambri-<br />

1b<br />

Figure 1:<br />

A fossil crustacean<br />

from the Lower<br />

Cambrian of<br />

Shropshire<br />

preserved with its<br />

soft-anatomy: a,<br />

oblique lateral<br />

view; b, ventral<br />

view (see also Fig.<br />

2). At more than<br />

511 million years<br />

old, this tiny<br />

fossil, just 0.3mm<br />

long, is the oldest<br />

3-dimensionally<br />

preserved<br />

complete animal<br />

ever found.<br />

89 www.esta-uk.org


TEACHING EARTH SCIENCES ● Volume 27 ● Number 3, 2002<br />

Figure 3:<br />

The small arthropod Kunmingella from the Lower Cambrian<br />

Chengjiang deposit of south China (about 520 million years old).<br />

The flattened specimen, about 5mm long, is preserved with most<br />

of its soft anatomy, including its head and body appendages.<br />

Once thought to be an ostracod, the preserved soft-anatomy of<br />

this animal indicates that it is not even a crustacean.<br />

Figure 2:<br />

The fossil<br />

crustacean from<br />

Shropshire<br />

reconstructed in<br />

ventral view (see<br />

also Fig. 1b). Two<br />

legs on the left<br />

side of the animal<br />

were lost during<br />

life or damaged<br />

after its death.<br />

an rocks. It is in these rocks that shelly fossils first<br />

appear in great numbers, as part of what is often<br />

referred to as the ‘Cambrian explosion’ of life. The<br />

Shropshire crustacean shows that complex animal body<br />

plans and animal behaviour already existed in the early<br />

Cambrian. That such complex animals existed at this<br />

time, poses the question of when their less derived animal<br />

ancestors began to evolve Was there a long evolutionary<br />

‘fuse’ extending back into the Precambrian<br />

The crustaceans from the Comley Limestones are<br />

just one of many instances of soft-bodied animals preserved<br />

in the Cambrian. Perhaps the most famous softbodied<br />

fauna is that of the Middle Cambrian Burgess<br />

Shale of British Columbia, Canada. But this fauna, like<br />

that of the Lower Cambrian soft-bodied fauna at<br />

Chengjiang, southern China (see Figure 3), is preserved<br />

as flattened impressions. The great beauty of the<br />

Shropshire find is that, preserved in 3-dimensions, the<br />

animals look as though they were alive just yesterday!<br />

Tiny Ordovician fossils from the American<br />

Midwest found in Scotland!<br />

In Oklahoma, in the American Midwest, there is a superb<br />

sequence of marine sedimentary rocks deposited during<br />

the Ordovician period, between about 500 and 440 million<br />

years ago. These outcrop in the Arbuckle Mountains,<br />

about 3-4 hours drive north of Dallas, Texas. The<br />

Ordovician rocks of Oklahoma are highly fossiliferous,<br />

bearing trilobites, brachiopods, corals, graptolites and<br />

many other fossil marine invertebrates. Amongst these<br />

are the tiny shells of ostracods (see Figure 4).<br />

Figure 4:<br />

The fossilized shell of the ostracod Steusloffina from the<br />

Ordovician. The figured species occurs in Caradoc-age rocks<br />

(about 450 million years old) of the Girvan district of Scotland,<br />

and is also widely documented from North America. The fossil is<br />

about 2mm long, with its anterior (head) end to the right.<br />

Ostracods are small bivalved crustaceans that typically<br />

are about 1 to 2mm long. Known from over 30,000<br />

species, they occupy all modern aquatic environments<br />

from peat bogs to the ocean depths. However, during<br />

the Ordovician the range of environments they occupied<br />

was limited to shallow to mid-shelf marine settings<br />

where they occurred amongst the sea-bottom<br />

dwelling marine benthos.<br />

The global patterns of Ordovician ostracod distribution<br />

can be used to map out the margins of ancient continents.<br />

When these ancient continents were separated<br />

by wide ocean barriers, ostracods were unable to<br />

migrate and faunas became highly provincial. But when<br />

continents drifted together, as a result of plate tectonic<br />

movements, ostracods migrated from one continent to<br />

another, and the faunas became cosmopolitan. By measuring<br />

these changes it is possible to track the relative<br />

position of ancient continents during the Ordovician.<br />

In Oklahoma, the Ordovician ostracod faunas<br />

www.esta-uk.org<br />

90


TEACHING EARTH SCIENCES ● Volume 27 ● Number 3, 2002<br />

belong to the Laurentia palaeocontinent (Figure 5), a<br />

landmass that comprised most of modern North America,<br />

but also Scotland, and which straddled the equator.<br />

We know that Scotland was part of Laurentia because it<br />

has the same Ordovician fossils as North America.<br />

Indeed, ostracods from the American Midwest can<br />

be found in Ordovician rocks at Girvan on the Ayrshire<br />

coast! To the south of Laurentia, separated by<br />

the intervening Iapetus (or Proto-Atlantic)<br />

Ocean, lay the Baltica palaeocontinent, modern<br />

Scandinavia. Further south was the Avalonia<br />

microcontinent, formed from parts of<br />

Europe, including England and Wales, and<br />

parts of eastern North America, including<br />

Nova Scotia and New Brunswick (see<br />

Figure 5). Still further south was the<br />

Gondwana supercontinent extending<br />

to the South Pole, where, during<br />

the late Ordovician, North Africa<br />

was situated.<br />

By looking at the Ordovician<br />

ostracods from Oklahoma and<br />

Scotland and comparing them to<br />

those of England and Wales, the<br />

relative palaeogeographical position<br />

of the Avalonia and Laurentia palaeocontinents<br />

can be tracked. In early late<br />

Ordovician times, about 455 million years ago (see<br />

Figure 5), the ostracods of England and Wales were<br />

very different from those of Scotland or Oklahoma.<br />

But, by latest Ordovician times, about 440 million<br />

years ago, they shared numerous species in common,<br />

indicating that there was free migration of ostracods<br />

between these palaeocontinents. Together with other<br />

palaeontological, geological and palaeomagnetic data,<br />

this indicates that Avalonia had drifted north towards<br />

Laurentia and that the intervening Iapetus Ocean had<br />

narrowed and was about to close. Indeed, Scotland<br />

was about to be joined to England and Wales for the<br />

first time, about 440 to 430 million years ago.<br />

Ostracods can be used for reconstructions of<br />

Ordovician palaeogeography globally. Thus, the ostracod<br />

faunas of the Argentine Precordillera are different<br />

from those of the rest of South America until the late<br />

Ordovician (see Figure 5). It was at this time, about 440<br />

million years ago, that the Precordillera microcontinent,<br />

which had split off from North America much<br />

earlier during the Cambrian, finally docked with the<br />

rest of South America.<br />

Ostracod fossils may be diminutive in size, but their<br />

distribution patterns can nonetheless have global significance<br />

for reconstructions of ancient geography.<br />

Figure 5:<br />

Reconstruction of palaeogeography for the Caradoc Series of the Ordovician, about 450<br />

million years ago. England and Wales lie on the Avalonia palaeocontinent south of the<br />

equator, whilst Scotland is situated on the Laurentia palaeocontinent to the north.<br />

Intervening is the Iapetus Ocean. As Avalonia drifted northwards towards Laurentia during<br />

the late Ordovician, the ostracod faunas of the two continental areas became progressively<br />

more cosmopolitan as widespread migration took place. Many species were common to<br />

Laurentia and Avalonia by latest Ordovician times (about 440 million years ago).<br />

Figure 6:<br />

A rare conodont bedding plane assemblage from southern<br />

Scotland. Several paired Elements (‘teeth’) are visible lying<br />

adjacent to a lower Silurian graptolite (top of picture). The whole<br />

conodont assemblage is about 1cm long. At about 435 million<br />

years old, this is the oldest near complete vertebrate mouthpart<br />

apparutus ever found in Scotland.<br />

Ancient fossil mouthparts from the Silurian<br />

marine abyss<br />

At about 1cm long, a newly discovered conodont<br />

mouthpart assemblage from the Silurian of southern<br />

Scotland may not look very threatening (see Figure 6).<br />

91 www.esta-uk.org


TEACHING EARTH SCIENCES ● Volume 27 ● Number 3, 2002<br />

component of the marine plankton biomass in deeper<br />

water settings of the early Palaeozoic. But if this is so,<br />

surely something must have been eating them Despite<br />

the millions of graptolites recovered, virtually none<br />

show evidence of bite marks, mastication or occurrence<br />

in coprolites (fossil dung).<br />

The Scottish conodont mouthpart association<br />

strongly suggests that predators were living with the<br />

graptolites in the overlying water column. It indicates a<br />

much more complex ancient ecology than could be<br />

gleaned from the graptolite fossils alone. Given that<br />

there is also evidence for fossilized marine worms in<br />

the newly discovered association, which may also have<br />

been predators, the fossil find from southern Scotland<br />

provides much evidence for the existence of complex<br />

ecosystems in the Silurian marine abyss.<br />

Figure 7:<br />

Foraminifera are unicellular eukaryotic organisms (Protists) that<br />

construct a calcium carbonate or agglutinated shell. They range<br />

through a vast array of different marine and brackish water<br />

environments and are powerful indices of ecology. The specimens<br />

shown are shallow marine forms from the Pacific region, and are<br />

between 0.5 to 2mm in size.<br />

Nevertheless, it provides evidence for predators in the<br />

Silurian seas and, at around 435 million years old, is the<br />

oldest near complete vertebrate mouthpart apparatus<br />

ever found in Scotland.<br />

Conodonts were early vertebrates with a somewhat<br />

‘eel-like’ body-morphology. They possessed hard<br />

mouthparts, rather like teeth, collectively arranged as a<br />

kind of ‘jaw’. Most conodonts are known only from<br />

these ‘teeth’, which typically became dissociated after<br />

the animal’s death. Only very rarely are the ‘teeth’,<br />

more correctly termed ‘conodont elements’, preserved<br />

in association. Such finds are very important for interpreting<br />

the way in which these animals were eating, and<br />

also for meaningful taxonomic assessment of their close<br />

biological affinities.<br />

The Silurian rocks in which the conodont mouthparts<br />

were found, are thought to have been deposited in<br />

a deep sea setting. They comprise black, organic rich<br />

mudstones, accumulated on the sea floor under anoxic<br />

sea bottom conditions, probably in an ocean-facing<br />

marine basin. Fossils in these rocks are mainly graptolites,<br />

colonial marine organisms that produced a rigid<br />

protein skeleton. These lived in the overlying water<br />

column but sank to the sea bottom after death, to be<br />

locked into the sediments. Millions of graptolite fossils<br />

have been recovered in southern Scotland and from<br />

similar rocks in the English Lake District, Wales and<br />

worldwide. These animals evidently formed a huge<br />

Small fossils make big waves in the Pacific Ocean<br />

In the Pacific Ocean tsunamis strike with alarming regularity<br />

and cause extensive damage and loss of life: in<br />

the recent Papua New Guinea tsunami of 1998 over a<br />

thousand people were killed.<br />

Tsunamis are generated by large scale geological phenomena<br />

such as earthquakes, or the movement of large<br />

slumps of sediment on the continental shelf or slope, or<br />

more rarely are caused by bolide impacts. The resulting<br />

shock waves from these effects can generate “tidal waves”<br />

of hundreds of metres, which are capable of picking up<br />

rock boulders the size of houses and depositing them<br />

onshore. Recognising the rock deposits formed by past<br />

tsunami can help to determine their periodicity and causal<br />

effects. In this way the potentially devastating effects of<br />

future tsunamis can be identified before they occur.<br />

Shell assemblages in recent and ancient sedimentary<br />

deposits can provide a characteristic signature, a kind of<br />

‘genetic-fingerprinting’ for tsunami. Such tsunamidiagnostic<br />

assemblages have been recognised in ancient<br />

rock deposits from the Pacific to the Mediterranean.<br />

Thus, on the Polynesian islands of the Pacific, coastal<br />

sedimentary rocks previously interpreted as beach<br />

deposits, can be ‘fingerprinted’ as tsunami deposits by<br />

their macrofaunal and microfaunal content. Such<br />

deposits contain many shell fragments of typical marine<br />

invertebrates such as bivalves and gastropods, together<br />

with abundant foraminifera and ostracods. Foraminifera<br />

are ‘large’ millimetre scale unicellular organisms which<br />

produce a calcium carbonate or agglutinated shell, and<br />

which include sea-bottom dwelling and planktonic<br />

forms (see Figure 7; see also the article by Ian Wilkinson<br />

in this volume, page 78).<br />

The faunal signature of tsunami deposits in Polynesia<br />

can be very distinctive. Ongoing work by British<br />

Geological Survey scientists shows that the larger<br />

invertebrate fauna are pummelled to fragments of less<br />

than 1mm size. The microfauna are winnowed to<br />

remove both the smaller (immature) sea-bottom<br />

foraminifera, and the more buoyant planktonic<br />

foraminifera. This leaves a ‘skewed’ assemblage of<br />

www.esta-uk.org<br />

92


TEACHING EARTH SCIENCES ● Volume 27 ● Number 3, 2002<br />

robust, mature, sea-bottom forms, which are clearly<br />

not representative of an original living population. As<br />

the fauna are also transported onshore by the tsunami,<br />

there is a landwards displacement of environment-specific,<br />

often incompatible faunas, ripped-up from different<br />

ecologies as the tsunami approaches shore. The<br />

distinctive faunal assemblage that this produces, a winnowed,<br />

pummelled, mixed fauna from different marine<br />

communities, ‘fingerprints’ the high-energy milieu of<br />

deposition and distinguishes the deposits as the product<br />

of a tsunami.<br />

Conclusions: the importance of fossils<br />

Notwithstanding their immense value for the relative<br />

dating and correlation of rock sequences, the ‘snapshots’<br />

presented here indicate the wider geological and<br />

biological applications of fossils. Fossils are the key evidence<br />

for the processes of evolution viewed in the long,<br />

geological time-frame and, when preserved with their<br />

soft anatomy, provide immense detail about past global<br />

biodiversity. The distributional patterns of fossils can be<br />

used to track the positions of ancient continents, and to<br />

reconstruct complex ancient ecosystems. Fossils can be<br />

things of great aesthetic beauty, but have a much more<br />

practical role when they ‘fingerprint’ geological hazards<br />

such as tsunami.<br />

References<br />

The following references provide more detailed information<br />

about the ‘Cambrian explosion’, ancient palaeogeography,<br />

conodonts and tsunamis. For animations and<br />

much more information about tsunamis visit the United<br />

States National Ocean and Atmospheric Administration<br />

website at: http://www.pmel.noaa.gov/tsunami/<br />

http://www.pmel.noaa.gov/tsunami/<br />

An excellent general guide to fossils is the book by<br />

Richard Fortey given below.<br />

Cocks, L.R.M. (2000) The early Palaeozoic Geography<br />

of Europe. Journal of the Geological Society, London,<br />

157, pp. 1-10.<br />

Fortey, R. (2002) Fossils: The Key to the Past. Third Edition.<br />

London: Natural History Museum<br />

Keating, B.H., Waythomas, C.F. & Dawson, A.G. (2000)<br />

Landslides and Tsunamis. Birkhäuser Verlag. Basel-<br />

Boston-Berlin.<br />

Purnell, M. A., Donoghue, P. C. J. & Aldridge, R. J. (2000)<br />

Orientation and anatomical notation in conodonts.<br />

Journal of Paleontology, 74, pp. 113-122.<br />

Siveter, D.J., Williams, M. & Walossek, D. (2001)<br />

A phosphatocopid crustacean with appendages from<br />

the Lower Cambrian. <strong>Science</strong>, 293, pp. 479-481.<br />

Dr Mark Williams FGS CGeol<br />

British Geological Survey,<br />

Keyworth,<br />

Nottingham NG12 5GG<br />

Email: mwilli@bgs.ac.uk<br />

Acknowledgments<br />

David Siveter and Mark Purnell of Leicester<br />

University, Dieter Walossek of Ulm University,<br />

Maxine Akhurst and James Floyd of BGS<br />

Edinburgh, and Ian Wilkinson and Dave Tappin of<br />

BGS Nottingham are collaborators on various<br />

aspects of the work detailed here. The<br />

reconstruction used in Figure 2 was drawn by<br />

Dieter Walossek and Chris Wardle. The<br />

reconstruction of Ordovician palaeogeography<br />

used in Figure 5 is courtesy of Mike Bassett and<br />

Leonid Popov of the National Museum of Wales.<br />

The image of foraminifera used in Figure 7 is<br />

courtesy of Ian Wilkinson. Thanks to Vicki Ward<br />

of Abbot Beyne School, Burton-on-Trent, for<br />

information about the A-Level Geology<br />

curriculum. Many of the specimens figured here<br />

are in the museum collection of the British<br />

Geological Survey at Keyworth, Nottingham.<br />

Images are available from the author by request.<br />

This article is published with the permission of the<br />

Director, British Geological Survey (N.E.R.C.).<br />

93 www.esta-uk.org


TEACHING EARTH SCIENCES ● Volume 27 ● Number 3, 2002<br />

From Flood to Drought and Back Again<br />

BRIAN WATERS<br />

This paper is based on some work that looked at the Potential Impacts of Climate Change in the<br />

East Midlands on behalf of the East Midlands Sustainable Development Round Table (emsdOt)<br />

and future climate scenarios in the West Midlands for the Environment Agency. These were two of<br />

a number of regional and sectoral studies, some of which can be accessed through the web site<br />

of the UK Climate Impact Programme (www.ukcip.org.uk).<br />

Everyone must have heard by now of the changing<br />

climate and its likely causes due to emissions of<br />

greenhouse gases, especially carbon dioxide from<br />

the combustion of fossil fuels. Several studies have<br />

looked at the likely future climate scenarios based on<br />

assumptions of future trends in carbon dioxide concentrations<br />

in the atmosphere. In 1998 UKCIP published a<br />

report for the UK (Hulme and Jenkins, 1998) and this<br />

was the starting point for the East Midlands study.<br />

One of the team involved in the study used a technique<br />

of downscaling to produce scenarios for the East<br />

Midlands of temperature and rainfall (East Midlands<br />

Sustainable Development Round Table, 2000). The<br />

Environment Agency commissioned similar work for<br />

the West Midlands (Environment Agency, 2001a).<br />

More recently, the scenarios for the whole of the UK<br />

have been updated (Hulme et al, 2002) to produce<br />

maps at a 50km scale giving similar information about<br />

predicted scenarios for 2020, 2050 and 2080. The scenarios<br />

show predictions for annual averages and seasonal<br />

changes in temperature and rainfall for a range<br />

from low to high future carbon dioxide emissions. All<br />

the scenarios imply increases in emissions, just at different<br />

rates. Picking one of these – the Medium High<br />

Scenario – Table 1 shows how the predictions have<br />

changed between 1998 and 2002 for the East Midlands.<br />

Although there are differences in detail, the broad<br />

picture looks the same:<br />

● Increased average temperatures<br />

● Hotter drier summers<br />

● Warmer wetter winters<br />

The changes look modest but an increase of 3ºC in<br />

average temperature ought to be compared with a 5º<br />

difference between average temperatures now and the<br />

last ice age. In addition the studies are predicting:<br />

● More extreme events such as periods of intense rainfall<br />

and drought.<br />

● Less frost and snow.<br />

● Rising sea levels due to expansion of the sea and<br />

melting of polar and glacial ice caps (compounded by<br />

relative changes in land level due to geological events<br />

in some locations such as the East Coast).<br />

These changes will have profound effects and the purpose<br />

of the impact studies is to look at these both in<br />

terms of their local significance and across sectors such<br />

as agriculture, wildlife, industry and health.<br />

For the Environment Agency the impacts are also<br />

significant. It regulates and manages water resources,<br />

flood defence, water quality and fisheries along with air<br />

and land quality.<br />

Increasing temperatures and reduced summer rainfall<br />

are expected to increase the demand for water for<br />

domestic and commercial use. For example, people will<br />

shower more and want to water their gardens, agriculture<br />

will want to irrigate more and industry will require<br />

more cooling water. There are already problems with<br />

water supply in some areas where falling groundwater<br />

levels due to over abstraction and low stream flows during<br />

dry periods mean that restrictions are imposed on<br />

abstractors most years. Changes in water availability<br />

also affect wetlands and other water features which<br />

have a consequential effect on wildlife. The Environment<br />

Agency has recently published a series of Water<br />

Resources Strategies (Environment Agency, 2001b)<br />

which start to address these problems. Everyone is<br />

Table 1 Changing Scenarios For East Midlands 2080-2100<br />

The table shows how little the Medium-High scenarios for temperature and precipitation towards<br />

the end of this century have changed with improvements in climate models used in 1998 and 2002.<br />

UKCIP 1998 UKCIP 2002<br />

Temperature Change o C Annual +2.8 to +3.2 +3.0 to +3.5<br />

Summer +2.5 to +3.0 +3.0 to +4.0<br />

Winter +3.0 to +3.5 +2.0 to +3.0<br />

Precipitation % Change Annual +4 to +9 +0 to -10<br />

Summer -15 to -30 -40 to -50<br />

Winter +23 to +30 +20 to +30<br />

www.esta-uk.org<br />

94


TEACHING EARTH SCIENCES ● Volume 27 ● Number 3, 2002<br />

familiar with the problems of drought in many third<br />

world countries but the UK is likely to find itself in a<br />

similar, if not so critical, position. Even so, the Water<br />

Resources Strategies highlight that the annual effective<br />

rainfall per head of population in parts of the UK is<br />

already less than in countries such as Ethiopia.<br />

The response has to include ensuring that new water<br />

resources are made available but not before demand has<br />

been reduced through improving water efficiency.<br />

Much can be done to reduce demand by using waterefficient<br />

appliances, reducing waste and leakage and<br />

adopting trickle irrigation.<br />

At the other extreme, intense storms at any time of<br />

year can produce local flooding. Wetter winters are also<br />

likely to increase the risk of more widespread flooding<br />

as catchments become saturated and unable to absorb<br />

heavier rainfall. Sea level rise also increases the risk of<br />

coastal flooding. There have been several major floods<br />

in the last five years affecting large parts of the country.<br />

It is too early to say with confidence that these are due<br />

to climate change as there are natural variations in climate<br />

and flooding frequency anyway. However, they<br />

are certainly indicative of the sort of events that can be<br />

expected more frequently as this century progresses.<br />

The responses to the increased risk of flooding<br />

include building more defences along river banks and<br />

coastal stretches, improving flood prediction tools and<br />

warning systems and raising awareness among the population<br />

at risk. Nearly 2 million properties are in areas at<br />

some risk of flooding but many residents are unaware<br />

because there has not been flooding in recent years. The<br />

areas at risk are shown in indicative flood plain maps<br />

which can be found on the Environment Agency’s web<br />

site at www.environment-agency.gov.uk. Insurance companies<br />

are naturally showing an interest as the damage<br />

over the last few years has escalated. They are loading<br />

premiums for property in flood risk areas and pressing<br />

the Government to provide more money for flood<br />

defence under threat of withdrawing cover.<br />

There is little sense in producing more problems for<br />

the future by building more properties in the flood<br />

plains so the Environment Agency works closely with<br />

local planning authorities to ensure that this does not<br />

happen. Local flooding is also made worse by increased<br />

rates of run off from developments such as paved areas<br />

and roof drainage. The Environment Agency is keen to<br />

promote sustainable drainage through techniques such<br />

as porous pavements, soakaways and retention wetlands<br />

to store the water underground or at least attenuate the<br />

rate of run off.<br />

The changes in temperature and water regime will<br />

affect wildlife and there are many recorded instances of<br />

alien species appearing, losses of some species and<br />

extended growing seasons. New crops such as maize,<br />

grapes and sunflowers are appearing. Some of these<br />

changes could be beneficial, offering new markets for<br />

farmers and a wider, or at least different, diversity of<br />

wildlife. Decisions will have to be made about whether it<br />

is sensible to try to preserve habitats against the climatic odds, or whether it<br />

would be more sensible to go with nature and help species to adapt or move<br />

to better areas.<br />

Climate change will also impact on a wide range of other sectors. Health<br />

risks from exotic diseases, damage to roads, rail and other infrastructure,<br />

and loss of markets for some products but increases for others (example:<br />

equipment for heating and air conditioning). Will working patterns become<br />

more like those in southern Europe Will there be a renaissance in tourism<br />

in the UK as the current popular resorts become unpleasantly hot These<br />

are the sorts of questions addressed by the regional and sectoral studies.<br />

Whichever of the climate scenarios proves eventually to be the one that<br />

happens, they run close together in the early years and only diverge towards<br />

the middle of this century. The outlook for the next 50 years or so is for an<br />

annual average temperature rise of between 1 and 2 degrees. This is largely<br />

unavoidable even if we cut our use of fossil fuels dramatically now. The best<br />

that can be hoped for is that the Kyoto agreement is ratified and forms the<br />

basis for future cuts of greenhouse gas emissions of up to 60% or more.<br />

There are lots of opportunities to bring climate change issues into<br />

schools. The UKCIP web site has many publications which can be a source<br />

of information on local impact studies or specific to sectors such as health,<br />

agriculture of wildlife. These could form the basis for a detailed look at the<br />

potential impacts in the school catchment. In addition, looking at the<br />

school’s use of energy for heating and lighting, local transport issues, water<br />

use and flood risk all help to raise awareness of the difficulties in mitigation<br />

and adaptation.<br />

Dr Brian Waters, recently retired as Regional Water Manager for the Midlands<br />

Region of the Environment Agency.<br />

References<br />

East Midlands Sustainable Development Round Table (2000) The Potential<br />

Impacts of Climate Change in the east Midlands, Summary Report, available<br />

from Environment Agency, 550 Streetsbrook Road, Solihull, B91 1QT<br />

and at www.ukcip.org.uk<br />

Environment Agency, (2001a) State of the Environment Report; West Midlands<br />

Region, available from Environment Agency, 550 Streetsbrook Road,<br />

Solihull, B91 1QT. A more detailed report “Climate Change in the West<br />

Midlands” is available from the same address.<br />

Environment Agency, (2001b), Water Resources for the Future: A Strategy for<br />

England and Wales, March 2001. Available, along with Regional appendices,<br />

from Environment Agency offices.<br />

Hulme, M., Jenkins, G.J. (1998) Climate Scenarios for the UK: scientific<br />

report. UKCIP Technical Report No. 1, Climatic Research Unit, Norwich, UK,<br />

80pp.<br />

Hulme, M., Jenkins, G.J., Lu, X., Turnpenny, J.R., Mitchell, T.D., Jones,<br />

R.G., Lowe, J., Murphy, J.M., Hassell, D., Boorman, P., McDonald, R.,<br />

and Hill, S. (2002); Climate Change Scenarios for the United Kingdom: The<br />

UKCIP02 Scientific Report, Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research,<br />

School 0f Environmental <strong>Science</strong>s, University of East Anglia, Norwich,<br />

UK. 120pp. Available at www.ukcip.org.uk<br />

95 www.esta-uk.org


TEACHING EARTH SCIENCES ● Volume 27 ● Number 3, 2002<br />

ESTA Conference 2003:<br />

“<strong>Earth</strong> <strong>Science</strong>s in the 21st Century”<br />

University of Manchester, 12th-14th September 2003<br />

The next ESTA Course and Conference, hosted by the University of Manchester Department of <strong>Earth</strong> <strong>Science</strong>s in<br />

conjunction with the Manchester Museum, promises to be a most informative and enjoyable affair. Manchester<br />

occupied much of our television viewing in the summer when the city hosted the 2002 Commonwealth Games,<br />

and then gained (geological) fame again recently with a series of small (but certainly perceptible!) earthquakes. The<br />

city of Manchester is enjoying a renaissance, and the centre is now a thriving village of loft apartments, striking<br />

modern architecture, pleasant shopping areas, clubs and restaurants. Thanks to the Games, Manchester now has<br />

some of the finest sports and leisure facilities in the country. The city is within easy reach of some of the finest<br />

scenery and geological sites in the country: the Peak District, the Pennines, and the Cheshire Plain – destinations<br />

of some of our Sunday field workshops.<br />

The venue for the Friday and Saturday workshops, lectures and exhibitions will be the Department of <strong>Earth</strong> <strong>Science</strong>s<br />

laboratories and lecture rooms, as well as facilities in the Education Section of the Manchester Museum,<br />

immediately opposite across Oxford Road. Coffee, tea and lunches will also be served here. The Museum has been<br />

refurbished recently, and the geological galleries are a delight. Delegates will also see some of the new geochemical<br />

laboratories in <strong>Earth</strong> <strong>Science</strong>s.<br />

Accommodation for delegates will be in comfortable en-suite rooms at Hulme Hall, just 10 minutes’ walk away<br />

from the university and museum. Breakfast, evening meals, Conference Dinner, bar and Open Lectures will be<br />

held at Hulme Hall. For those wishing to explore a little further, Hulme Hall is situated at the start of the ‘curry<br />

mile’ – more than 50 neon-lit Asian restaurants in actually about half a mile.<br />

Provisional Programme<br />

Friday 12th September<br />

INSET for local teachers and ESTA members, all day.<br />

● Key Stages 1/2 –<br />

● Key Stages 3/4 –<br />

● Post-16 – Update for teachers of Geology at AS/A Level, largely led by Manchester staff.<br />

● Higher Education<br />

Saturday 13th September<br />

The programme is yet to be arranged, but will consist largely of updating lectures and workshops. Whilst the majority<br />

of these will be of interest to teachers of Geology to AS and A Level, much will be relevant to teachers of <strong>Earth</strong> <strong>Science</strong><br />

at all Key Stages. As well as some specific provision for Primary and lower Secondary teachers, attendance at the<br />

full day will result in greater confidence through the acquisition of more background knowledge of the subject.<br />

Sunday 14th September<br />

● Fieldwork in the local region, with a choice of visits to be arranged.<br />

Attendance is open to all with an interest in <strong>Earth</strong> science education, on a day visit, or a residential basis. (You do<br />

not need to be an ESTA member). There will be Open Lectures on Saturday which will be free: there are fees for<br />

other aspects of the conference, to cover refreshments and the usual overheads.<br />

The convenor, Dr Paul Selden, will be pleased to supply further details and a booking form for the whole conference,<br />

once these become available in the Spring of 2003.<br />

For further information, contact the Conference Convenor: Dr Paul Selden, Dept of <strong>Earth</strong> <strong>Science</strong>s, University<br />

of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL. Tel: 0161 275 3296; email: Paul.Selden@man.ac.uk<br />

Meanwhile, visit these websites:<br />

http://www.man.ac.uk............................................University of Manchester<br />

http://www.earth.man.ac.uk...................................Department of <strong>Earth</strong> <strong>Science</strong>s (inc. a section on the recent earthquakes)<br />

http://museum.man.ac.uk ......................................The Manchester Museum<br />

http://www.man.ac.uk/conferences/hulme.html ....Hulme Hall<br />

http://www.manchester.com...................................Virtual Manchester<br />

www.esta-uk.org<br />

96


TEACHING EARTH SCIENCES ● Volume 27 ● Number 3, 2002<br />

Reviews<br />

Geology and building stones in Wales (north) / Daereg a cherrig adeiladau yng<br />

Nghymru (y gogledd); Geology and building stones in Wales (south) / Daereg a cherrig<br />

adeiladau yng Nghymru (y de).<br />

Graham Lott and Bill Barclay. Folded sheets 42x30cm;<br />

British Geological Survey 2002, Keyworth, Nottingham NG123 5GG.<br />

£1.95 each. ISBN 0-85272-423-3; 0-85272-422-5.<br />

These two pamphlets are published<br />

by the Geological Survey, but<br />

produced in association with<br />

CADW (Welsh Historical Monuments),<br />

the National Museums and Galleries of<br />

Wales and the Countryside Council for<br />

Wales. They are printed on thin glazed<br />

card, presumably for protection when<br />

carried in the field. Each carries a<br />

bilingual (Welsh and English) text:<br />

Welsh on one side and English on the<br />

other, but with a single set of<br />

photographs, and an appropriate and<br />

simplified geological map.<br />

For each pamphlet, there is a brief<br />

account of the geology of the region,<br />

together with reference to the use of the<br />

rocks in buildings (e.g. the purple<br />

Caerbwdi sandstones of the Cambrian<br />

for the building of St. David’s cathedral).<br />

Illustrations, necessarily quite small, are<br />

given of representative or important<br />

buildings. These range from the<br />

prehistoric huts at Din Lligwy, Anglesey,<br />

and a terraced house in Pontypridd, to<br />

castles and railway viaducts. In addition<br />

to the use of Welsh stone (usually locally<br />

sourced) there is also a section in each<br />

pamphlet on Foreign stones. It is pointed<br />

out that there are few good freestones in<br />

Wales, and that easily worked stones have<br />

been imported from a variety of foreign<br />

sources, such as Bath and Portland<br />

stones. These have principally been used<br />

from the middle of the nineteenth<br />

century, and also mainly for important<br />

buildings, whether civic, religious or<br />

commercial. Decorative stones are given<br />

a paragraph in each pamphlet: again<br />

there are not many Welsh stones that are<br />

suitable, and so imported stones are<br />

prevalent. Each pamphlet has a<br />

geological column, listing not only the<br />

geological periods, but also the principal<br />

building stones found (the column in<br />

English only). Finally, there is a list of<br />

important geologists (all deceased) who<br />

have worked in Wales, listed in order of<br />

dates of birth, ranging from G. Owen<br />

(1552-1613) and E. Lhuyd (1660-1613)<br />

to R.M. Cummings (1926-1995).<br />

The geological maps also show the<br />

locations of the buildings illustrated, and<br />

it is of interest that, with the exception of<br />

the Old College Building in Aberystwyth<br />

(incorrectly described as being of<br />

Grinshill Stone – it is mainly of Cefn<br />

Sandstone), no other buildings are<br />

shown in Wales south of Harlech and<br />

north of St. David,s. I would have liked<br />

to see some illustration of , for example,<br />

the houses of Dolgellau, constructed of<br />

almost monolithic blocks of local<br />

igneous rocks, or of the many uses of<br />

greywackes in Mid Wales.<br />

The authors and publishers are to be<br />

congratulated on having produced<br />

concise, informative and attractive<br />

publications, widening our knowledge of<br />

Welsh building stones from just the slate<br />

industry, to take in rocks of all ages, and<br />

in all situations. May we look forward to<br />

seeing this series extended to cover areas<br />

in the rest of Britain<br />

Denis Bates<br />

University of Wales,<br />

Aberyswyth<br />

97 www.esta-uk.org


Your President<br />

Introduced<br />

Activities to Develop<br />

Thinking Ski ls in<br />

Activities and<br />

Demonstrations:<br />

<strong>Earth</strong>quakes<br />

Response to the<br />

House of Commons<br />

<strong>Science</strong> and<br />

Technology Commi t e<br />

inquiry into the<br />

<strong>Science</strong> Cu riculum for<br />

group - West Wales<br />

Geology Teachers’<br />

Network<br />

Highlights from the<br />

post-16 ‘bring and<br />

share’ se sion a the<br />

ESTA Conference,<br />

update<br />

B ok Reviews<br />

Websearch<br />

News and Resources<br />

rth <strong>Science</strong><br />

ache<br />

Browne<br />

Websearch<br />

TEACHING EARTH SCIENCES ● Volume 27 ● Number 3, 2002<br />

ESTA Diary<br />

Reviews<br />

JANUARY 2003<br />

Friday 3rd - Sunday 5th January<br />

ASE, University of Birmingham.<br />

[Sat 4th is <strong>Earth</strong> <strong>Science</strong> day]<br />

APRIL 2003<br />

Wednesday 16th April<br />

10:00 to 16:30 Mineral collecting and<br />

conservation – hammering out a future<br />

Harold Riley Suite, University of Salford<br />

Wednesday 23rd - Friday 25th April<br />

Geographical <strong>Association</strong> Annual<br />

Conference<br />

University of Derby<br />

SEPTEMBER 2003<br />

8th - 12th September<br />

The BA Festival of <strong>Science</strong> 2003<br />

University of Salford<br />

Friday 12th - Sunday 14th September<br />

ESTA Annual Conference<br />

University of Manchester<br />

SEPTEMBER 2004<br />

6th - 10th September<br />

The BA Festival of <strong>Science</strong> 2004<br />

University of Exeter<br />

To Advertise in<br />

<strong>teaching</strong><br />

EARTH<br />

SCIENCES<br />

Telephone<br />

Ian Ray<br />

0161 486 0326<br />

<strong>teaching</strong><br />

EARTH<br />

SCIENCES<br />

Journal of the EARTH SCIENCE TEACHERS’ ASSOCIATION<br />

Volume 26 ● Number 4, 2001 ● ISSN 0957-8005<br />

Martin Whiteley<br />

Thinking Geology:<br />

Geology Teaching<br />

Recovering the<br />

Leaning Tower of Pisa<br />

<strong>Earth</strong> <strong>Science</strong><br />

14 - 19 year olds<br />

Se ting up a local<br />

Kingston 2 01<br />

ESTA Conference<br />

www.esta-uk.org<br />

Discovering Geology: Fossil Focus, Graptolites.<br />

Ian Wilkinson, Susan Rigby and Jan Zalasiewicz.<br />

An <strong>Earth</strong>wise publication; folded sheet 42x30cm;<br />

British Geological Survey 2001, Keyworth, Nottingham NG123 5GG.<br />

ISBN 0-85-272390-3. £1.95.<br />

This double-sided sheet, printed on<br />

stout glazed card, follows the<br />

format established in a number of<br />

publications by the British Geological<br />

Survey, packing a concise account of<br />

graptolites into a minimum of space.<br />

Colour is used both in the photographs<br />

of individual graptolites, and also to great<br />

effect in the diagrams.<br />

The first panel deals with the<br />

morphology of the graptolites, and with<br />

their presumed modern relatives, the<br />

hemichordates. A good cutaway diagram<br />

of a Climacograptus shows the general<br />

structure, together with a diagram of a<br />

Didymograptus (described unfortunately<br />

as a “tuning folk graptoloid”!). Though<br />

this may be seen as a quibble, this latter<br />

diagram seems too diagrammatic: the<br />

two stipes appear to emerge from<br />

opposite sides of the sicula, and the<br />

sicula has a bulbous proximal end, rather<br />

than tapering to an extended nema.<br />

The second panel covers the range of<br />

morphologies exhibited by the<br />

Journal of the EARTH SCIENCE TEACHERS’ ASSOCIATION<br />

Volume 27 ● Number 1, 2002 ● ISSN 0957-8005<br />

<strong>teaching</strong><br />

EARTH<br />

SCIENCES<br />

rth <strong>Science</strong><br />

chers’ A so<br />

www.esta-uk.org<br />

Creationism and<br />

Evolution:<br />

Questions in the<br />

Cla sr om<br />

Institute of Biology<br />

Chemistry on the<br />

High Str et<br />

Peter Ke ne t<br />

<strong>Earth</strong> <strong>Science</strong><br />

Activities and<br />

Demonstrations:<br />

Fo sils and Time<br />

Mike Tuke<br />

Beyond Petroleum:<br />

Busine s and<br />

The Environment in<br />

the 21st Century John<br />

Using Foam Ru ber in<br />

an Aquarium To<br />

Simulate Plate-<br />

Tectonic And Glacial<br />

Phenomena<br />

John Wheeler<br />

Dorset and East<br />

Devon Coast:<br />

World Heritage Site<br />

ESTA Conference<br />

Update<br />

New ESTA Members<br />

News and Resources<br />

(including ESTA AGM)<br />

planktonic graptoloids, and the habitats<br />

in which they, and the sessile dendroids,<br />

lived. I was interested to see that the<br />

many branched form Cyrtograptus (c on<br />

the diagram) is shown as living at abyssal<br />

depths. However, this would mean that<br />

most specimens would have come from<br />

rocks interpreted as being oceanic: in<br />

contrast many specimens come from<br />

rocks which accumulated not on oceanic<br />

crust, but on deeper areas within shelves<br />

(such as the area around Builth Wells, in<br />

Wales). It is still likely, though, that they<br />

lived within deeper water than the<br />

majority of other graptoloids.<br />

A dramatic diagram shows the history<br />

of graptolites, relating their diversity to<br />

global events. This, together with the<br />

text, also illustrates the enormous<br />

potential that the graptoloids have as<br />

global timekeepers, with a pinpoint<br />

accuracy of only a few hundred thousand<br />

years. Finally, a panel of “Graptolites<br />

tales” deals with sex (all we can say is<br />

that they probably did it); Charles<br />

Lapworth; graptolites and roofing slates<br />

(they can only rarely be found on your<br />

roof); and what ate them (there is a<br />

specimen of a crumpled-up graptolite<br />

that may have been eaten: but we don’t<br />

know who did). Two cartoons illustrate<br />

this panel, as well as photographs.<br />

As with the other publications in this<br />

series, Graptolites tells a long story in<br />

simple terms, with the aid of good<br />

graphics. A surprising amount of detail is<br />

given, which bears comparison with<br />

coverage in the more basic textbooks.<br />

Furthermore, it is better presented, and<br />

also more up to date. It should certainly<br />

be on the shelves alongside more<br />

conventional texts, and students’<br />

attention should be drawn to it.<br />

Denis Bates<br />

University of Wales,<br />

Aberystwyth<br />

www.esta-uk.org<br />

98


TEACHING EARTH SCIENCES ● Volume 27 ● Number 3, 2002<br />

Websearch<br />

Walking with Beasts<br />

Discovery Channel has launched a Walking with Beasts site,<br />

which provides an opportunity to compare the approaches adopted<br />

by the leading TV science channels in the US and the UK.<br />

http://dsc.discovery.com/convergence/beasts/beasts.html<br />

The BBC site is<br />

www.bbc.co.uk/beasts<br />

Coastal Environments<br />

Coastline 2000<br />

www.angliacampus.com/public/sec/geog/coastln/page02.php<br />

Schemes of work<br />

www.learn.co.uki/gleaming/secondary/topical/ks3/<br />

coastalerosion/teachers/htm<br />

www.angliacampus.com/tour/sec/geog/coastal/index.htm<br />

Case study, Holderness coast<br />

www.bennett.karoo.net/topics/coasts/html<br />

Case study, Reculver<br />

www.users.globalnet.co.uk/~drayner/recintro.htm<br />

Case study, Droskyn Point, Perranporth, Cornwall<br />

cil-www.oce.orst.edu:8080/pporth.html<br />

All along the coastline<br />

www.theukcoastalzone.com/regional.asp<br />

National Geographic News: Archaeology & Paleontology<br />

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/archaeology.html<br />

Palaeontology in the News<br />

http://www-geology.ucdavis.edu/~GEL3/paleonews.html<br />

The Geological Society of America has re-posted its 1999 Geological<br />

Time Scale at<br />

geosociety.org/science/timescale/timescl.pdf<br />

It can be printed from that site.<br />

Glaciers and Ice<br />

Monitoring Glacier Changes from Space<br />

sdcd.gsfc.nasa.gov/GLACIER.BAY/hall.science.txt.html<br />

Glacier and Ice Sheet Research Group<br />

glacier.lowtem.hokudai.ac.jp/index-e.htm<br />

Glaciological research<br />

www.maths.ox.ac.uk/~fowler/research/glaciology.html<br />

Glaciers and Glaciations - Ice Sheets and Glacial Lakes<br />

vulcan.wr.usgs.gov/Glossary/Glaciers/framework.html<br />

Landscape Evolution<br />

CRC LEME:<br />

Cooperative Research Center for Landscape Evolution and Mineral<br />

Exploration<br />

leme.anu.edu.au/<br />

Numerical Models Of Landscape Evolution<br />

adder.ocean.dal.ca/philippe/LEM_Numerical_models.html<br />

Modeling Landscape Evolution<br />

erode.evsc.virginia.edu/frlect/introduction/index.html<br />

Oceans<br />

FEMA Fact Sheet: Hurricanes<br />

www.fema.gov/fema/hurricaf.html<br />

Ocean Planet<br />

seawifs.gsfc.nasa.gov/ocean-planet.html<br />

USGS Center for Coastal Geology<br />

stimpy.er.usgs.gov/<br />

USGS Marine and Coastal Geology Program<br />

marine.usgs.gov/<br />

USGS Woods Hole Field Center<br />

woodshole.er.usgs.gov/<br />

NOAA VENTS Program<br />

www.pmel.noaa.gov/vents/home.html<br />

Exploration of Mid-Ocean Ridges<br />

www.nerc.ac.uk/BRIDGE/<br />

<strong>Earth</strong>quakes<br />

National <strong>Earth</strong>quake Information Center<br />

wwwneic.cr.usgs.gov/<br />

Caltech Seismological Laboratory<br />

www.gps.caltech.edu/seismo/seismo.page.html<br />

Tsunami<br />

www.geophys.washington.edu/tsunami/intro.html<br />

Seismology and <strong>Earth</strong>quake Information<br />

www.geophys.washington.edu/SEIS/welcome.html<br />

USGS: Latest <strong>Earth</strong>quake Information<br />

quake.wr.usgs.gov/QUAKES/CURRENT/index.html<br />

San Francisco Bay Area <strong>Earth</strong>quake Map<br />

quake.wr.usgs.gov/recenteqs/Maps/SF_Bay.html<br />

99 www.esta-uk.org


Journal of the EARTH SCIENCE TEACHERS’ ASSOCIATION<br />

Volume 26 ● Number 4, 2001 ● ISSN 0957-8005<br />

Your President<br />

Introduced<br />

Martin Whiteley<br />

Thinking Ski ls in<br />

Geology Teaching<br />

Recovering the<br />

Leaning Tower of Pisa<br />

<strong>Earth</strong> <strong>Science</strong><br />

Activities and<br />

Demonstrations:<br />

<strong>Earth</strong>quakes<br />

Response to the<br />

House of Commons<br />

<strong>Science</strong> and<br />

Technology Commi t e<br />

14 - 19 year olds<br />

Se ting up a local<br />

group - West Wales<br />

Geology Teachers’<br />

Network<br />

Highlights from the<br />

post-16 ‘bring and<br />

share’ se sion a the<br />

ESTA Conference,<br />

Kingston 2001<br />

ESTA Conference<br />

update<br />

Book Reviews<br />

Websearch<br />

News and Resources<br />

rth <strong>Science</strong><br />

ache<br />

www.esta-uk.org<br />

rth <strong>Science</strong><br />

achers’ Assoc<br />

www.esta-uk.org<br />

Questions in the<br />

Cla sroom<br />

Institute of Biology<br />

Chemistry on the<br />

High Street<br />

Peter Kenne t<br />

<strong>Earth</strong> <strong>Science</strong><br />

Activities and<br />

Demonstrations:<br />

Fo sils and Time<br />

Browne<br />

Simulate Plate-<br />

Tectonic And Glacial<br />

Phenomena<br />

John Wheeler<br />

Dorset and East<br />

Devon Coast:<br />

World Heritage Site<br />

ESTA Conference<br />

Update<br />

New ESTA Members<br />

Websearch<br />

News and Resources<br />

(including ESTA AGM)<br />

TEACHING EARTH SCIENCES ● Volume 27 ● Number 3, 2002<br />

Websearch<br />

<strong>Earth</strong>’s Interior<br />

<strong>Earth</strong>’s Interior<br />

www.seismo.unr.edu/ftp/pub/louie/class/100/interior.html<br />

<strong>Earth</strong>’s Interior & Plate Tectonics<br />

www.solarviews.com/eng/earthint.htm<br />

<strong>Earth</strong>’s Interior<br />

www.seismo.unr.edu/ftp/pub/louie/class/100/interior.html<br />

Plate Tectonics<br />

NGDC Marine Geology and Geophysics Division<br />

www.ngdc.noaa.gov/mgg/mggd.html<br />

Ocean Drilling Program<br />

www-odp.tamu.edu/<br />

Plate Motion Calculator<br />

manbow.ori.u-tokyo.ac.jp/tamaki-html/plate_motion.html<br />

Plate Tectonics<br />

volcano.und.nodak.edu/vwdocs/msh/ov/ovpt/ovpt.html<br />

Structure and Tectonics Groups on the WWW<br />

craton.geol.brocku.ca/guest/jurgen/SITES.HTM<br />

Caribbean Geology & Tectonics Website<br />

www.fiu.edu/orgs/caribgeol<br />

Welcome to the World Stress Map (WSM)<br />

www-wsm.physik.uni-karlsruhe.de<br />

Plate Tectonics: History of an Idea<br />

Plate Tectonics<br />

www.ucmp.berkeley.edu/geology/techist.html<br />

This Dynamic <strong>Earth</strong> (USGS)<br />

pubs-usgs-gov/publications/text/dynamic.html<br />

Plate Tectonics: A whole new way of looking at your planet<br />

www.platetectonics.com/index.html<br />

Plate Tectonic Reconstructions at UTIG<br />

www.ig.utexas.edu/research/projects/plates/plates.html<br />

The Active Tectonics Web Server<br />

www.muohio.edu/tectonics/ActiveTectonics.html<br />

<strong>Earth</strong> Systems, Impacts<br />

Climate Processes over the Oceans<br />

eos.atmos.washington.edu/<br />

Comet Observation Home Page<br />

encke.jpl.nasa.gov<br />

Climate Change<br />

www.ucsusa.org/globalwarming/index.html<br />

U.S. Census Bureau<br />

www.census.gov/<br />

New Posting Retiring Stay in touch with<br />

Teaching <strong>Earth</strong> <strong>Science</strong>s News and Activities<br />

Subscribe to<br />

Teaching <strong>Earth</strong> <strong>Science</strong>s<br />

Subscription rates<br />

Full membership<br />

Student and retired membership<br />

£25.00 to UK addresses £12.50 to UK addresses<br />

Subscriber Details<br />

TITLE<br />

NAME<br />

<strong>teaching</strong><br />

EARTH<br />

SCIENCES<br />

Thinking Geology:<br />

Activities to Develop<br />

<strong>teaching</strong><br />

EARTH<br />

SCIENCES<br />

Creationism and<br />

Evolution:<br />

ADDRESS<br />

inquiry into the<br />

<strong>Science</strong> Cu riculum for<br />

Mike Tuke<br />

Beyond Petroleum:<br />

Busine s and<br />

The Environment in<br />

the 21st Century John<br />

Using Foam Rubber in<br />

an Aquarium To<br />

Journal of the EARTH SCIENCE TEACHERS’ ASSOCIATION<br />

Volume 27 ● Number 1, 2002 ● ISSN 0957-8005<br />

TOWN/CITY<br />

COUNTRY<br />

E-MAIL ADDRESS<br />

POST CODE/ZIP<br />

Membership Secretary:<br />

Owain Thomas<br />

PO Box 10, Narberth<br />

Pembrokeshire SA67 7YE<br />

Teaching <strong>Earth</strong> <strong>Science</strong>s - serving the <strong>Earth</strong> <strong>Science</strong> Education Community<br />

www.esta-uk.org<br />

100


TEACHING EARTH SCIENCES ● Volume 27 ● Number 3, 2002<br />

News and Resources<br />

Mineral Collecting and Conservation:<br />

Hammering Out a Future<br />

A one day conference to be held at the<br />

Harold Riley Suite, University of Salford,<br />

Wednesday 16th April 2003, 10:00 to 16:30<br />

Mineral collecting is scientifically and<br />

educationally important and a hobby enjoyed by<br />

many. However, many mineral sites are finite and the<br />

issue of sustainable collecting on mineral sites is<br />

becoming increasingly important. Collecting is<br />

fundamental to mineralogical research, and for<br />

educational, commercial and aesthetic purposes, but<br />

indiscriminate activity can deplete or destroy a<br />

mineralogical site. This conference aims to discuss the<br />

different aspects of mineral collecting and the best<br />

way of conserving the available mineral resource for<br />

future use by all interest groups.<br />

This meeting aims to open a debate rather than<br />

attempt to reach solutions and provides an<br />

opportunity to share views and identify and discuss<br />

issues. Speakers have been chosen to reflect a full<br />

range of views on the issues surrounding mineral<br />

collecting and include; the statutory conservation<br />

bodies; professional, hobbyist and academic research<br />

collectors; museums; landowners; and industrial<br />

archaeologists. The conference will conclude with an<br />

open debate and it is hoped that stimulating<br />

discussion will follow.<br />

The meeting will be co-convened by English<br />

Nature, the Geological Society’s Geoconservation<br />

Commission and the Russell Society. The conference<br />

proceedings will be published by English Nature and<br />

will be available shortly after the conference.<br />

Delegates will also have a chance to express their own<br />

views on mineral collecting and conservation in the<br />

form of written statements, which will be included<br />

with the proceedings volume and collected on the day<br />

of the conference.<br />

Further information from:<br />

Jennifer Yau,<br />

Environmental Impacts Team,<br />

English Nature, Northminster House,<br />

Peterborough, UK PE11UA<br />

(01733 455504).<br />

Do You Use Geological Sites – Have Your Say<br />

We need your help so that we can help you. Many readers of<br />

Teaching <strong>Earth</strong> <strong>Science</strong>s use geological and geomorphological<br />

sites as a <strong>teaching</strong> resource – these might include National Nature<br />

reserves (NNRs), Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSIs), Regional<br />

Important Geological/Geomorphological Sites (RIGS), show caves,<br />

country parks, coastal, river and other natural sections, pits and<br />

quarries.<br />

If this includes you or your school or you manage such a site for<br />

visits by school groups, then read on.<br />

The National Stone Centre (NSC) has been asked by English<br />

Nature to examine particularly the opportunities presented by the<br />

National Curriculum for using geological sites. The brief also includes<br />

a review of the use of geological sites for <strong>teaching</strong> <strong>Earth</strong> science and by<br />

schools in general. The NSC is working closely with ESTA members<br />

on this scheme. The time allowed for the project is very limited indeed<br />

and so will only enable a scoping study to be carried out.<br />

So we need as much help as you can give us.<br />

Please let the NSC know which sites you use and how you use<br />

them – with what groups – for what purpose – what curriculum area<br />

and how often Do you use background material published by others<br />

or produce you own customised material Do you experience access<br />

problems to sites Ideally would you like to use geological sites more<br />

frequently If so, what factors constrain use – cost, timetabling, staff<br />

cover, insurance cover, distance, curriculum/specification limitations<br />

If you wish we can e-mail these questions to you so that you can<br />

respond by e-mail (see below).<br />

The exercise may be a first step in helping English Nature to work<br />

more closely with schools – to help you to use geological and<br />

geomorphological sites. So your comments could have a positive<br />

payback for you in time. If you can help, please respond, if possible<br />

before 23 December 2002 to ian@nationalstonecentre.org.uk<br />

Ian Thomas<br />

Director, National Stone Centre<br />

Porter Lane, Wirksworth, Derbyshire DE4 4LS<br />

Tel + Fax: 01629 824833<br />

GeoSciEd IV, Calgary, Canada, August 10-14, 2003<br />

Details of this international conference are shown on the separate<br />

advertisement (p.102) and much more information is available on the<br />

highly-informative and regularly-updated website, www.geoscied.org. The<br />

objective of the meeting is to support colleagues across the world who are<br />

involved in <strong>Earth</strong> science education from elementary to university/college<br />

levels and beyond, through a variety of presentations, workshops and field<br />

visits. There will be opportunities to share expertise and experiences, for<br />

personal development and for networking with other geoscience educators<br />

from around the world. We do hope that ESTA and other readers of TES<br />

will be able to attend the meeting and to contribute as well. The Calgary<br />

Organising Committee hopes to support a limited number of attendees<br />

from Developing Countries. Consult the web site for further details.<br />

CK & RDT<br />

101 www.esta-uk.org


GeoSci advert<br />

to be dropped in by printers<br />

www.esta-uk.org<br />

102


THEMATIC TRAILS<br />

GEOLOGY AND THE BUILDINGS OF OXFORD Paul Jenkins<br />

A walk through the city of Oxford is likened to visiting an<br />

open-air museum. Attention is drawn to the variety of<br />

building materials both ancient and modern, used in the<br />

fabric of the city. Discussion of their suitability, durability,<br />

susceptibility to pollution and weathering, maintenance<br />

and periodic replacement is raised.<br />

44 pages, 22 illustrations, ISBN 0 948444 09 6 Thematic<br />

Trails (1988) £2.40<br />

GEOLOGY AT HARTLAND QUAY Chris Cornford & Alan Childs<br />

In a short cliff-foot walk along the beach at Hartland<br />

Quay, visitors are provided with a straightforward<br />

explanation of the local rocks and their history.<br />

Alternative pages provide a deeper commentary on<br />

aspects of the geology and in particular provides<br />

reference notes for examining the variety of structures<br />

exhibited in this dramatic location.<br />

40 pages, 47 illustrations, ISBN 0 948444 12 6 Thematic<br />

Trails (1989) £2.40<br />

THE CLIFFS OF HARTLAND QUAY Peter Keene<br />

Interpreting the shapes of coastal landforms is introduced<br />

as a method of understanding something of the<br />

environmental history of this dramatic coastal landscape.<br />

A short walk following the coastal path to the south of<br />

Hartland Quay puts this strategy into practice.<br />

40 pages, 24 illustrations, ISBN 0 948444 05 3<br />

Thematic Trails (1990) £2.40<br />

STRAWBERRY WATER TO MARSLAND MOUTH Peter Keene<br />

A short cliff-top walk between the small but spectacular<br />

coastal coombes of Welcome Mouth and Marsland<br />

explains what beaches, streams and valley sides can<br />

tell us of the history of this coastal landscape. 40<br />

pages, 24 illustrations, ISBN 0 948444 06 1<br />

Thematic Trails (1990) £2.40<br />

VALLEY OF ROCKS; LYNTON Peter Keene & Brian Pearce<br />

The drama of the valley is explored both by offering<br />

explanation for the spectacular scenery and by recalling<br />

its theatrical setting as seen through the eyes of those<br />

who have visited the valley in the past.<br />

44 pages, 35 illustrations, ISBN 0 948444 25 8<br />

Thematic Trails (1990) £2.40<br />

THE CLIFFS OF SAUNTON Peter Keene & Chris Cornford<br />

I n a short cliff-foot walk along the beach at Saunton,<br />

visitors are provided with an explanation for the local rocks<br />

that make up the cliff and the shore. Alternative pages<br />

provide a deeper commentary on aspects of the geology<br />

and a chance on the return walk to reconstruct the more<br />

recent history of this coast by a practical examination of the<br />

cliff face. 44 pages, 30 illustrations, ISBN 0 948444 24 X<br />

Thematic Trails (May 1993) £2.40<br />

INTERPRETING PLEISTOCENE DEPOSITS Peter Keene<br />

A field interpretation guide for beginners. A simple<br />

<strong>teaching</strong> model using an adapted graphic log sheet. Of<br />

wide general educational application, but designed for<br />

use with the following trails: ‘Westward Ho! Coastal<br />

Landscape Trail’, ‘Valley of Rocks, Lynton’, ‘The Cliffs of<br />

Saunton’, ‘Strawberry Water to Marsland Mouth’, ‘Prawle<br />

Peninsula Landscape Trail’ and ‘Burrator Dartmoor<br />

Landform Trail’ 10 pages, 10 illustrations<br />

Thematic Trails (1993 edition) £2.40<br />

MENDIPS New Sites for Old;<br />

a student’s guide to the geology of the east Mendips. This<br />

guide gives a detailed description of 39 safe, accessible<br />

sites chosen for their educational potential.<br />

192 pages, 46 illustrations,<br />

ISBN 086139 319 8 (NCC 1985) £2.50<br />

MALVERN HILLS; a student’s guide to the geology of the<br />

Malverns. D. W. Bullard (1989)<br />

The booklet includes detailed description of 21 geological<br />

sites of interest in the area.<br />

73 pages, 31 illustrations,<br />

ISBN 086139 548 4 (NCC) £2.25<br />

WENLOCK EDGE; geology <strong>teaching</strong> trail M. J. Harley (1988)<br />

Six sites suitable for educational fieldwork are described<br />

and suitable exercises outlined.<br />

22 pages, 15 illustrations,<br />

ISBN 086139 403 8 (NCC) £1.50<br />

BURRATOR, DARTMOOR LANDFORM TRAIL Peter Keene & Mike<br />

Harley (1987)<br />

An interactive circular 6 mile walk exploring the evolution<br />

of tor and valley scenery on Dartmoor.<br />

21 pages, 12 illustrations,<br />

ISBN 086139 385 6 (NCC) £1.50<br />

THE ICE AGE IN CWM IDWAL<br />

The Ice Age invested Cwm Idwal with a landscape whose<br />

combination of glaciological, geological and floristic<br />

elements is unsurpassed in mountain Britain. Cwm Idwal<br />

is readily accessible on good paths within a few minutes<br />

walk of the modern A5 route through Snowdonia.<br />

22 pages, 16 illustrations,<br />

ISBN 0 9511175 4 8<br />

Addison Landscape Publications (1988) £3.00<br />

THE ICE AGE IN Y GLYDERAU AND NANT FFRANCON<br />

Ice in the last main glaciation in Wales carved the glacial<br />

highway of Nant Ffrancon through the heart of Snowdonia<br />

so boldly as to ensure its place amongst the best known<br />

natural landmarks in Britain. The phenomena is explained<br />

in a way that is attractive to both specialist and visitor<br />

alike. 30 pages, 20 illustrations,<br />

ISBN 0 9511175 3 X<br />

Addison Landscape Publications (1988) £3.00<br />

LONDON. ILLUSTRATED GEOLOGICAL WALKS.<br />

BOOK 1 (The City)<br />

Adds to the well-known Pevsner accounts of the buildings<br />

of the City of London by offering comment upon the rock<br />

types used in familiar City streets. Maps set out the route<br />

clearly. No previous knowledge of geology is assumed. 98<br />

pages, 98 photographs, 14 maps,<br />

ISBN 0 7073 0350 8<br />

Geologists’ <strong>Association</strong> (1984) £4.95<br />

LONDON. ILLUSTRATED GEOLOGICAL WALKS.<br />

BOOK 2 (The West End)<br />

A wide range of exotic rock types are found in the shop<br />

fronts of Piccadilly, Tottenham Court Road and the office<br />

blocks of Central London. Again no previous knowledge of<br />

geology is assumed.<br />

142 pages, 128 photos, 16 maps,<br />

ISBN 0 7073 0416 4<br />

Geologists’ <strong>Association</strong> (1985) £4.95<br />

Some earlier items are still available - please enquire<br />

ORDERS TO: Dave Williams, Corner Cottage, School Lane, Hartwell, Northampton, NN7 2HL E-mail: earthscience@macunlimited.net<br />

Official orders will be invoiced. Cheques and postal orders should be made payable to ESTA. Order forms avaliable from the ESTA Website<br />

103 www.esta-uk.org


Key Stage 3<br />

<strong>Science</strong> of the <strong>Earth</strong> 11-14 Units have been devised to introduce <strong>Earth</strong> <strong>Science</strong> to pupils at Key<br />

Stage 3 level as part of their National Curriculum studies in <strong>Science</strong> and Geography.<br />

Each Unit occupies about one double period of <strong>teaching</strong> time and the Units are sold as 3-Unit<br />

packs. Units that are available now are:-<br />

GW: Groundwork - Introducing <strong>Earth</strong> <strong>Science</strong><br />

GW1 - Found in the Ground<br />

GW2 - Be a Mineral Expert<br />

GW3 - Be a Rock Detective<br />

LP: Life from the Past - Introducing Fossils<br />

LP1 - Remains to be seen<br />

LP2 - A well-preserved specimen<br />

LP3 - A fate worse than death - fossilization!<br />

ME: Moulding <strong>Earth</strong>’s Surface - Weathering, Erosion<br />

and Transportation<br />

ME1 - Breaking up rocks<br />

ME2 - Rain, rain and rain again<br />

ME3 - Landshaping<br />

PP: Power from the past: coal (a full colour poster is<br />

available with this Unit for a p & p charge of<br />

£1.15 (inc. VAT) please indicate if you do not<br />

require this.<br />

PP1 - Coal swamp<br />

PP2 - Layers and seams<br />

PP3 - ‘Unspoiling’ the countryside<br />

HC: Hidden changes in the <strong>Earth</strong>: introduction to<br />

metamorphism<br />

HC1 - Overheated<br />

HC2 - Under Pressure<br />

HC3 - Under Heat and Pressure<br />

M: Magma - introducing igneous processes<br />

M1 - Lava in the lab.<br />

M2 - Lava landscapes<br />

M3 - Crystallising magma<br />

SR: Secondhand rocks: Introducing sedimentary<br />

processes<br />

SR1 - In the stream<br />

SR2 - Blowing hot and cold<br />

SR3 - Sediment to rock, rock to sediment<br />

BM: Bulk constructional minerals<br />

BM1 - What is our town made of<br />

BM2 - From source to site<br />

BM3 - Dig it - or not<br />

FW: Steps towards the rock face - introducing<br />

fieldwork<br />

FW1 - Thinking it through<br />

FW2 - Rocks from the big screen<br />

FW3 - Rock trail<br />

ES: <strong>Earth</strong>’s surface features<br />

ES1 - Patterns on the <strong>Earth</strong><br />

ES2 - Is the <strong>Earth</strong> cracking up<br />

ES3 - <strong>Earth</strong>’s moving surface<br />

E: Power source: oil and energy<br />

E1 - Crisis in Kiama - which energy source now<br />

E2 - Black gold - oil from the depths<br />

E3 - Trap - oil and gas caught underground<br />

WG: Water overground and underground<br />

WG1 - Oasis on a desert island-the permeability<br />

problem<br />

WG2 - Out of sight, out of mind - waste disposal<br />

and ground water pollution<br />

WG3 - The dam that failed<br />

SPECIAL REDUCED PRICE<br />

£2.00 each (post free)<br />

for Key Stage 3<br />

A Teachers’ Guide to the<br />

‘<strong>Science</strong> of the <strong>Earth</strong>’ Approach - £1.00<br />

Key Stage 4<br />

SoE1: Changes to the atmosphere<br />

SoE2: Geological Changes - <strong>Earth</strong>’s Structure and Plate Tectonics<br />

SoE3: Geological Changes - Rock Formation and Deformation<br />

Investigating the <strong>Science</strong> of the <strong>Earth</strong>. Practical and investigative activities for Key Stage 4 and beyond.<br />

Price £2.95(Per Unit)<br />

ROUTEWAY – solving planning and technical problems of building a major road. A three-unit pack dealing with aspects<br />

of planning and engineering geology and associated environmental problems. <strong>Science</strong> and<br />

Geography courses at Key Stage 4. Also applicable to problem-solving modules in ‘A’ level or Vocational <strong>Science</strong> or<br />

Geology courses.<br />

Price: £4.95<br />

Please note - to claim ESTA member prices on the above items, you must enclose a copy of this<br />

advertisement or an ESTA order form, or simply mention your ESTA membership.<br />

ORDERS TO: Dave Williams, Corner Cottage, School Lane, Hartwell, Northampton, NN7 2HL E-mail: earthscience@macunlimited.net<br />

Official orders will be invoiced. Cheques and postal orders should be made payable to ESTA. Order forms avaliable from the ESTA Website<br />

www.esta-uk.org<br />

104


GRAIN SIZE SCALE<br />

Laminated cards specially printed for ESTA<br />

(6 x 9 cm credit card size). They show grains<br />

from coarse sand down to silt.<br />

30p each<br />

20p each for 20 to 99 copies<br />

100 copies or more £15<br />

1000 copies £100<br />

WORKING WITH ROCKS PACK:<br />

Folder of Teacher notes and worksheets; Christina’s Story<br />

- tale of a marble headstone; 16 postcards of building<br />

stones - for town and graveyard trails.<br />

KS1/2/3. £7.00<br />

ROCK, MINERAL & FOSSIL KITS<br />

1. ESTA MINERAL SAMPLES<br />

Boxed set of ten minerals (haematite, magnetite,<br />

galena, pyrite, mica, gypsum, calcite, halite, quartz &<br />

feldspar), plus steel nail, copper coin, streak plate,<br />

dropper botter & magnifier. Essential for use with<br />

activities in PEST 9 - MINERALS (copy included).<br />

Suitable for KS2/KS3. £15.00<br />

2. DIVERSITY OF LIFE - FOSSIL REPLICAS SET<br />

Boxed fossil replicas, selected to illustrate the<br />

diversity of life over geological time (dinosaur tooth,<br />

trilobite, ammonite, shark tooth, icthyosaur tooth,<br />

fish, sea urchin, coral, reptile footprint, seed fern, sea<br />

lily & shrimp).<br />

Produced by GEOU (Open University Dept of <strong>Earth</strong><br />

<strong>Science</strong>s) & includes detailed notes and a copy of<br />

PEST 1 - FOSSILS.<br />

Suitable for KS2/KS3/KS4. £16.00<br />

3. ESTA ROCK KITS - ask for details<br />

POSTCARDS<br />

1. THE FLOOR OF THE OCEANS<br />

(14 x 9cm) miniature version of wall map.<br />

25p each, 10 or more 20p each.<br />

2. BUILDING STONES<br />

A set of 16 postcards depicting building or<br />

ornamental stones to be found in towns and cities<br />

throughout the country.<br />

All at natural size. £3.50.<br />

MAPS AND WALLCHARTS<br />

1. GEOTHERMAL MAP OF THE UNITED KINGDOM<br />

Published by BGS<br />

This coloured chart consists of a map (scale<br />

1:1,500,000) showing the geothermal potential of the<br />

UK along with annotations describing the major sites<br />

and projects. Size approx. 80 x 80 cm.<br />

£4.00 per folded map<br />

2. THE FLOOR OF THE OCEAN<br />

published by Marie Tharp<br />

Useful for 11-14 Unit - <strong>Earth</strong>’s surface features.<br />

Specially imported by ESTA from the USA. Printed on<br />

laminated paper, a superb map showing the relief<br />

featues of the ocean floor in graphic detail.<br />

£14.00 per rolled map<br />

3. LE PUYS VOLCANOES (AUVERGNE)<br />

Published by the French Bureau of Geology and Mines<br />

and the Auvergne Volcanoes Regional Park. Useful for<br />

11- 14 unit - Magma.<br />

A folded geological map of the region at 1: 25,000<br />

scale colourfully illustrates the volcanic sites - £9.00<br />

An accompanying sheet of 16 postcards has been cut<br />

into 4-A4 sized sheets for easier mailing - £5.00<br />

Set of maps and photos - £13.00<br />

4. GEOLOGICAL MAP OF THE WORLD<br />

Published by OU/ESSO with help from ESTA.<br />

Including oceanic crust colour coded by age,<br />

beautiful! 100cm x 150 cm. Price £8.00.<br />

5. TARR’S WORLD SEISMICITY MAP<br />

(return of an old favourite). This large map (120cm x<br />

90cm) shows a distribution of the world’s major<br />

earthquakes - shallow, medium and deep focus.<br />

Magnitudes and dates are given for many. £5.00<br />

6. U.K. GEOLOGY WALL MAP<br />

One of Ordnance Survey series for KS2/3, published<br />

with help from ESTA.<br />

£4.00 paper, £12.00 laminated.<br />

Some earlier items are still available - please enquire<br />

ORDERS TO: Dave Williams, Corner Cottage, School Lane, Hartwell, Northampton, NN7 2HL E-mail: earthscience@macunlimited.net<br />

Official orders will be invoiced. Cheques and postal orders should be made payable to ESTA. Order forms avaliable from the ESTA Website<br />

N.B. All items are posted free of charge.<br />

105 www.esta-uk.org

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!