18.01.2015 Views

Geology and ultramafic rocks of the Paleoproterozoic Pulju ...

Geology and ultramafic rocks of the Paleoproterozoic Pulju ...

Geology and ultramafic rocks of the Paleoproterozoic Pulju ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Transform your PDFs into Flipbooks and boost your revenue!

Leverage SEO-optimized Flipbooks, powerful backlinks, and multimedia content to professionally showcase your products and significantly increase your reach.

1<br />

INTEGRATED TECHNOLOGIES FOR MINERAL EXPLORATION<br />

PILOT PROJECT FOR NICKEL ORE DEPOSITS<br />

Brite-EuRam BE-1117 GeoNickel<br />

Task 1.2 Mineralogy <strong>and</strong> modelling <strong>of</strong> Ni sulfide deposits in<br />

komatiitic/picritic extrusives<br />

Technical Report 6.5<br />

geology <strong>and</strong> <strong>ultramafic</strong> <strong>rocks</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> paleoproterozoic<br />

pulju greenstone belt,<br />

western lapl<strong>and</strong><br />

Heikki Papunen<br />

Turku University<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>Geology</strong><br />

1998


2<br />

Contents<br />

6.5 <strong>Geology</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>ultramafic</strong> <strong>rocks</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Paleoproterozoic</strong> <strong>Pulju</strong> Greenstone Belt,<br />

Western Lapl<strong>and</strong><br />

6.5.1 Introduction<br />

6.5.2 General <strong>Geology</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Pulju</strong> Belt<br />

6.5.2.1 The supracrustal belt <strong>and</strong> surrounding granitoids<br />

6.5.2.2 The <strong>Pulju</strong> Belt as a part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> succession <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Central<br />

Lapl<strong>and</strong> greenstone belt<br />

6.5.2.3 Structure <strong>and</strong> metamorphism <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Pulju</strong> Belt<br />

6.5.2.4 Stratigraphy <strong>and</strong> rock sequence<br />

6.5.2.5 Rock types <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Mertavaara Formation<br />

6.5.2.6 Ultramafic <strong>rocks</strong><br />

6.5.2.6.1 General division<br />

6.5.2.6.2 Non-fractionated komatiitic flows<br />

6.5.2.6.3 Fractionated komatiitic flows - komatiitic cumulates<br />

6.5.2.7 Mineralogy <strong>of</strong> <strong>ultramafic</strong>s<br />

6.5.2.7.1 Olivine<br />

6.5.2.7.2 Amphiboles<br />

6.5.2.7.3 Chlorite<br />

6.5.2.7.4 Phlogopite<br />

6.5.2.7.5 Pyroxenes<br />

6.5.3 Geochemistry <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Mertavaara Group <strong>rocks</strong><br />

6.5.3.1 Methods <strong>and</strong> samples<br />

6.5.3.2 Felsic <strong>and</strong> mafic <strong>rocks</strong><br />

6.5.3.3 Non-fractionated <strong>ultramafic</strong> flows<br />

6.5.3.4 Fractionated komatiititic flows - komatiitic cumulates<br />

6.5.3.4.1 Main elements<br />

6.5.3.4.2 Trace elements<br />

6.5.3.4.3 Factor analysis<br />

6.5.3.5 Geochemical classification <strong>of</strong> komatiites<br />

6.5.3.5.1 Non-fractionated komatiitic flows (chlorite-amphibole <strong>rocks</strong>)<br />

6.5.3.5.2 Komatiitic cumulates<br />

6.5.3.6 Alteration <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> cumulates<br />

6.5.4 Sulphides<br />

6.5.5 Summary<br />

Tables<br />

References


3<br />

Figure 6.5.1 Generalized geological map <strong>of</strong> nor<strong>the</strong>rn Fennosc<strong>and</strong>ia; <strong>the</strong> <strong>Pulju</strong> area is deliated<br />

6.5 <strong>Geology</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>ultramafic</strong> <strong>rocks</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Paleoproterozoic</strong><br />

<strong>Pulju</strong> Greenstone Belt, Western Lapl<strong>and</strong><br />

6.5.1 Introduction<br />

The <strong>Pulju</strong> greenstone belt, in <strong>the</strong> west <strong>of</strong> Kittilä municipality, forms <strong>the</strong> western edge <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

central Lapl<strong>and</strong> greenstone complex in Finnish Lapl<strong>and</strong> (Fig. 6.5.1). With abundant <strong>ultramafic</strong><br />

<strong>rocks</strong> <strong>and</strong> associated sulfidic metasediments, <strong>the</strong> belt trends NNE from <strong>the</strong> Ounasjoki<br />

river to <strong>Pulju</strong> village, where it is intersected by a circular body <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Pulju</strong> granite. Beyond<br />

<strong>the</strong> <strong>Pulju</strong> granite, it continues northwards as <strong>the</strong> Kietsimä-Peltotunturi belt <strong>and</strong> fur<strong>the</strong>r into<br />

Norway, where its extensions are <strong>the</strong> Anarjokka (Gammon 1977) <strong>and</strong> Karasjok Greenstones<br />

(Barnes <strong>and</strong> Often 1990).<br />

The <strong>ultramafic</strong>s <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> belt have been known since <strong>the</strong> pioneering work <strong>of</strong> Mikkola (E.<br />

Mikkola 1941). Suomen Malmi Oy undertook fieldwork in <strong>the</strong> area in <strong>the</strong> early 1960s to


4<br />

check high-altitude aeromagnetic anomalies measured by <strong>the</strong> Geological Survey <strong>of</strong> Finl<strong>and</strong><br />

(GSF) (Söderholm 1966). At <strong>the</strong> beginning <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 1970s, a reconnaissance geochemical<br />

survey <strong>of</strong> stream sediments conducted by Outokumpu Oy revealed a number <strong>of</strong> nickel,<br />

chromium <strong>and</strong> base metal anomalies, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> follow-up geological fieldwork pinpointed<br />

some outcrops <strong>of</strong> sulfide-bearing <strong>ultramafic</strong>s. The area was one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> targets studied by <strong>the</strong><br />

Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>Geology</strong>, University <strong>of</strong> Turku, in its investigations <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>ultramafic</strong>s <strong>of</strong><br />

Lapl<strong>and</strong> in 1974-1979 (Papunen et al. 1977, 1980, Heino 1977, Idman 1980). At <strong>the</strong> same<br />

time, some shallow diamond drill holes were made in <strong>the</strong> sulfide-bearing <strong>ultramafic</strong>s <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Siettelöjoki area. After low-altitude airborne geophysical surveys in <strong>the</strong> mid-1970s,<br />

Outokumpu Oy continued prospecting in <strong>the</strong> area, with detailed geological mapping,<br />

geochemical till sampling, ground geophysics <strong>and</strong> diamond drilling (Lahtinen 1979, Inkinen<br />

et al 1984).<br />

The bedrock crops out selectively in some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> hilly areas, most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> area being<br />

covered with bogs <strong>and</strong> Quaternary glacial deposits. Geological maps are <strong>the</strong>refore based on<br />

geophysics, geochemical till sampling <strong>and</strong> drilling data.<br />

To reinterpret <strong>the</strong> existing geological <strong>and</strong> geochemical data <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> new information<br />

gleaned from geophysical low-altitude surveys conducted by <strong>the</strong> GSF in 1990, <strong>the</strong> Department<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>Geology</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> University <strong>of</strong> Turku reinvestigated <strong>the</strong> area in 1990 (Meriläinen<br />

1993), <strong>the</strong> focus this time being on <strong>the</strong> origin <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>ultramafic</strong>s <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir potential for sulfide<br />

nickel deposits. In this respect, <strong>the</strong> experience gained in Western Australia <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> physical<br />

volcanology <strong>and</strong> geochemistry <strong>of</strong> komatiites (Gole et al. 1987, Barnes et al. 1988, Hill<br />

et al. 1990) is relevant <strong>and</strong> has been applied in interpretations presented here.<br />

6.5.2 General <strong>Geology</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Pulju</strong> Belt<br />

6.5.2.1 The supracrustal belt <strong>and</strong> surrounding granitoids<br />

The <strong>Pulju</strong> Belt lies west <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Kittilä Greenstone area proper (for <strong>the</strong> geology <strong>of</strong> Central<br />

Lapl<strong>and</strong>, see Lehtonen et al. 1998). The belt comprises a sequence <strong>of</strong> supracrustal <strong>rocks</strong>,<br />

starting with continental lith<strong>of</strong>acies with quartzites <strong>and</strong> biotite gneisses, <strong>and</strong> passing upwards<br />

into pelitic metasediments interlayered with <strong>ultramafic</strong> cumulates <strong>and</strong> lavas, <strong>and</strong><br />

fur<strong>the</strong>r into mafic volcanics <strong>and</strong> metasediments probably <strong>of</strong> a marine environment. In <strong>the</strong><br />

west, <strong>the</strong> belt is bordered by <strong>the</strong> Hetta granite, which intersects <strong>the</strong> <strong>Pulju</strong> Belt as numerous<br />

veins. The Hetta granite is considered to be part <strong>of</strong> a reworked Archaean granitoid crust that<br />

was remobilized during <strong>the</strong> Svecokarelian orogeny, about 1950 Ma ago (Lehtonen et al.<br />

1985). The <strong>Pulju</strong> granitoid body intersects <strong>the</strong> supracrustal belt as a small isolated cupola<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Hetta granitoid. At Kiimatievat, in <strong>the</strong> nor<strong>the</strong>rn part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Pulju</strong> Belt, Hakanen (1977)<br />

studied a small molybdenite occurrence associated with calc-silicate <strong>rocks</strong> at <strong>the</strong> contacts<br />

<strong>of</strong> conformable pegmatite veins. It is not sure whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> molybdenum pegmatite is related<br />

to <strong>the</strong> Hetta synorogenic granitoid or to <strong>the</strong> anorogenic granitoids <strong>of</strong> Tepasto (1760 Ma)<br />

located sou<strong>the</strong>ast <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> belt, but <strong>the</strong> appearance <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> veins along <strong>the</strong> orogenic deforma-


5<br />

tion structures suggests an association with <strong>the</strong> synorogenic Hetta granite.<br />

The nor<strong>the</strong>rn extension <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Pulju</strong> Belt, here called <strong>the</strong> Kietsimä-Peltotunturi belt,<br />

is not known as well as <strong>the</strong> <strong>Pulju</strong> Belt proper. Reconnaissance mapping <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>ultramafic</strong>s<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Kietsimä-Peltotunturi belt (Papunen et al. 1977) indicates, however, that <strong>the</strong> rock<br />

types <strong>of</strong> both are similar although carbonation is more extensive <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> grade <strong>of</strong> metamorphism<br />

somewhat higher in <strong>the</strong> Peltotunturi <strong>ultramafic</strong>s (Julku 1982, Papunen et al. 1977).<br />

According to Henriksen (1983), Barnes <strong>and</strong> Often (1990) <strong>and</strong> Davidsen (1994), <strong>the</strong><br />

Karasjok Greenstone Belt, which is in <strong>the</strong> possible extension <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Peltotunturi-Kietsimä<br />

Belt, comprises metamorphosed <strong>and</strong> deformed equivalents ranging upwards from continental<br />

clastic sediments to shallow marine sediments <strong>and</strong> subaerial to shallow marine mafic<br />

volcanics, komatiitic <strong>and</strong> tholeiitic volcanics, <strong>and</strong> ending with a formation composed <strong>of</strong><br />

mafic to intermediate volcanics <strong>and</strong> clastic sediments.<br />

6.5.2.2 The <strong>Pulju</strong> Belt as a part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> succession <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Central<br />

Lapl<strong>and</strong> greenstone belt<br />

The general geology <strong>and</strong> stratigraphy <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Central Lapl<strong>and</strong> area have been reviewed by<br />

Lehtonen et al. (1985, 1992, 1998), Silvennoinen (1985), Räsänen et al. (1989) <strong>and</strong><br />

Manninen (1991). Recent underst<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> stratigraphy <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> supracrustal sequence <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> Central Lapl<strong>and</strong> Greenstone Belt (CLGB, Fig. 1) as presented by Lehtonen et al. (1998)<br />

divides <strong>the</strong> sequence into seven Groups. The two lowermost Groups, Salla <strong>and</strong> Onkamo,<br />

are characterized by intermediate to felsic metavolcanics <strong>and</strong> tholeiitic to komatiitic<br />

metavolcanics, respectively. They are considered to have been deposited c. 2.50-2.44 Ga<br />

ago. The overlying Sodankylä (> 2.21 Ga) Group is characterized by <strong>the</strong> Virttiövaara quartzite<br />

Formation <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> albitized metasediments <strong>and</strong> mafic metavolcanics <strong>of</strong> Honkavaara.<br />

Upwards, <strong>the</strong> Savukoski Group is divided into <strong>the</strong> Matarakoski phyllite-black schist-dolomite<br />

Formation (> 2.13 Ga), <strong>the</strong> Linkupalo tholeiitic volcanite Formation (> 2.05 Ga), <strong>the</strong><br />

Sotkaselkä picritic metavolcanite Formation <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> overlying Sattasvaara komatiitic<br />

metavolcanite Formation (> 2.05 Ga). The Savukoski Group is overlain by <strong>the</strong> Kittilä Group<br />

(c. 2.012 Ga), which is composed <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Fe-tholeiitic Kautoselkä, BIF-characterized<br />

Porkonen <strong>and</strong> Mg-tholeiitic Vesmajärvi formations, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Pyhäjärvi Formation, which is<br />

characterized by mica schists <strong>and</strong> greywackes. The Lainio Group overlies <strong>the</strong> Kittilä Group<br />

<strong>and</strong> contains three formations: Tuulijoki (> 1.883 Ga), with lamprophyric metavolcanics;<br />

Latvajärvi (1.883 Ga), with intermediate to felsic metavolcanics; <strong>and</strong> Ylläs (< 1.883 Ga),<br />

with quartzites, mica schists <strong>and</strong> conglomerates. The youngest sedimentary unit, <strong>the</strong> Kumpu<br />

Group, is composed <strong>of</strong> quartzites <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Levi Formation.<br />

The layered mafic igneous complexes in central Lapl<strong>and</strong>, Koitelainen, Akanvaara etc.<br />

(2.44 Ga), are thus coeval with <strong>the</strong> Onkamo Group metavolcanics, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Kevitsa mafic<br />

igneous complex (2.05 Ga) intersects <strong>the</strong> Sattasvaara-type komatiites.<br />

The Matarakoski Formation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Savukoski Group consists principally <strong>of</strong> graphitic<br />

<strong>and</strong> sulfidic sediments interlayered with dolomites <strong>and</strong> calc-silicate <strong>rocks</strong>. The komatiites<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Sattasvaara Formation overlie <strong>the</strong> Matarakoski sedimentary unit <strong>and</strong> frequently display<br />

pillows <strong>and</strong> pyroclastic breccia structures (Saverikko 1983, 1985). Krill et al. (1985)


6<br />

Figure 6.5.2 Genralized geological map <strong>and</strong> cross sections <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Pulju</strong> belt


7<br />

obtained an age <strong>of</strong> 2.085 Ga for <strong>the</strong> pyroclastic komatiites <strong>of</strong> Finnmark, Norway, which<br />

have been correlated with <strong>the</strong> komatiites <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Sattasvaara Formation in central Lapl<strong>and</strong><br />

(Manninen 1991). The lower part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Kittilä Group consists <strong>of</strong> Fe-tholeiitic <strong>and</strong> Mgtholeiitic<br />

mafic volcanics separated by an extensive chemosedimentary unit, <strong>the</strong> Porkonen<br />

Iron Formation. In geochemistry, <strong>the</strong> volcanics display, in general, pristine mantle characteristics<br />

<strong>and</strong> are less contaminated than <strong>the</strong> volcanics <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Savukoski <strong>and</strong> Sodankylä<br />

Groups.<br />

According to Lehtonen et al. (1998), <strong>the</strong> surface between <strong>the</strong> Onkamo <strong>and</strong> Sodankylä<br />

Groups is wea<strong>the</strong>red, indicating a hiatus, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> contact between <strong>the</strong> Savukoski <strong>and</strong> Kittilä<br />

Groups is tectonic, with lenses <strong>of</strong> <strong>ultramafic</strong> cumulates interpreted by Hanski (1997) to be<br />

a part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ancient obducted oceanic crust. The sequence <strong>of</strong> supracrustal <strong>rocks</strong> in <strong>the</strong><br />

Sodankylä, Savukoski <strong>and</strong> Kittilä Groups suggests an intracontinental basin evolution that<br />

terminated with <strong>the</strong> formation <strong>of</strong> oceanic crust in <strong>the</strong> Kittilä Group. The depth <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> depositional<br />

basin varied in time <strong>and</strong> place. Magmatic activity was associated with periods <strong>of</strong><br />

regional hydro<strong>the</strong>rmal processes, implying long-lived <strong>the</strong>rmal activity in <strong>the</strong> mantle.<br />

The relationship <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Pulju</strong> Belt with <strong>the</strong> Central Lapl<strong>and</strong> Greenstone Belt (CLGB)<br />

has been a subject <strong>of</strong> controversy. Meriläinen (1976) reported a U-Pb zircon age <strong>of</strong> 2720<br />

Ma for an albite diabase intersecting <strong>the</strong> Karasjok quartzite in Norway, in <strong>the</strong> nor<strong>the</strong>rn<br />

extension <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Pulju</strong> Belt. This date <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> greenstone belt association <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Pulju</strong> Belt<br />

<strong>rocks</strong> led Ga‡l et al. (1987) to consider <strong>the</strong> belt Archaean in age. However, <strong>the</strong> recent description<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> stratigraphy <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> CLGB by Lehtonen et al. (1998) correlates very well with<br />

that <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Pulju</strong> Belt, which can thus be considered <strong>the</strong> western extension <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> CLGB.<br />

6.5.2.3 Structure <strong>and</strong> metamorphism <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Pulju</strong> Belt<br />

The <strong>Pulju</strong> Belt occupies an open V-shaped area on <strong>the</strong> geological map (Fig. 6.5.2). The lowaltitude<br />

aeromagnetic maps produced by <strong>the</strong> GSF in 1991 give us a reliable basis on which<br />

to interpret <strong>the</strong> extent <strong>and</strong> structures <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Belt. The comprehensive study <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> deformation<br />

structures <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Sirkka-Pahtavuoma area <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Kittilä greenstone belt by Koistinen<br />

<strong>and</strong> Virransalo (1985) provided <strong>the</strong> background for Rastas <strong>and</strong> Kilpeläinen (1991), who<br />

compiled a dynamic model <strong>of</strong> deformation phases in <strong>the</strong> <strong>Pulju</strong> Belt by investigating <strong>the</strong><br />

deformation structures in <strong>the</strong> Mertavaara key area on outcrop <strong>and</strong> micro scales. The following<br />

deformation analysis <strong>and</strong> notes on metamorphism are based on <strong>the</strong>ir observations.<br />

The <strong>rocks</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Pulju</strong> Belt are not favourable for deformation analysis, because <strong>the</strong><br />

frequently outcropping mafic <strong>and</strong> <strong>ultramafic</strong> metavolcanics do not display refolding <strong>and</strong><br />

overprinting deformation features as well as do pelitic <strong>rocks</strong>. The metapelites lying between<br />

<strong>the</strong> volcanics are not appropriate ei<strong>the</strong>r, because, being rich in sulfides <strong>and</strong> graphite, <strong>the</strong>y<br />

intensify all possible deformations displaying only <strong>the</strong> latest features. The best rock types<br />

for deformation analysis among those cropping out in <strong>the</strong> area are arenitic-argillic metasediments,<br />

<strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Mertavaara area is <strong>the</strong> only place where <strong>the</strong>y are exposed, <strong>and</strong> even <strong>the</strong>re<br />

only sparsely.<br />

Primary sedimentary layering is visible in <strong>the</strong> metasediments as regular compositional<br />

b<strong>and</strong>ing (Fig. 6.5.3). The various deformation phases can be followed down to <strong>the</strong> oldest<br />

one, which deforms <strong>the</strong> primary layering.


8<br />

Figure 6.5.3 Folded primary layering in a quartzite outcrop at Mertavaara<br />

The first deformation phase, D 1<br />

, is well represented by <strong>the</strong> strong foliation, S 1<br />

, parallel<br />

or subparallel to <strong>the</strong> layering. S 1<br />

is also <strong>the</strong> strongest foliation in <strong>the</strong> non-layered rock<br />

types <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Mertavaara area, <strong>and</strong> thus provides a basis for correlations <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r deformation<br />

phases. In <strong>the</strong> metasediments, <strong>the</strong> S 1<br />

foliation is manifested as thorough parallelism<br />

<strong>of</strong> all sheetlike minerals. S 1<br />

is also prominent in <strong>the</strong> <strong>ultramafic</strong> komatiitic flows. The weak<br />

foliation locally observed in massive serpentinites parallels <strong>the</strong> main foliation, S 1<br />

, <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

amphibole-chlorite <strong>rocks</strong> nearby, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> rare foliation in serpentinites has been interpreted<br />

as S 1<br />

. Shear zones <strong>and</strong> 1-20 cm wide mylonites subparallel to <strong>the</strong> layering characterize D 1<br />

as does small-scale intrafolial isoclinal folding, F 1<br />

.<br />

The main folding phase at Mertavaara was F 2<br />

, a tight folding that deforms both S 0<br />

<strong>and</strong><br />

S 1<br />

. The fold axes <strong>of</strong> F 2<br />

trend nor<strong>the</strong>ast <strong>and</strong> plunge southwest at a small angle. The axial<br />

plane dips gently to <strong>the</strong> west, <strong>and</strong> an intense crenulation cleavage, S 2<br />

, parallels <strong>the</strong> axis <strong>of</strong><br />

F 2<br />

. The shallow dipping or subhorizontal D 2<br />

structures are only visible in vertical sections<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> outcrops. The gentle dip <strong>of</strong> F 2<br />

folding has been considered a primary D 2<br />

feature <strong>and</strong><br />

not a consequence <strong>of</strong> younger deformation phases, thus indicating overthrusting from <strong>the</strong><br />

northwest.<br />

Two deformation phases younger than D 2<br />

, that is, D 3<br />

<strong>and</strong> D 4<br />

, have been encountered.<br />

Both exist as open folds deforming D 1<br />

<strong>and</strong> D 2<br />

structures. For example, an east-west-trending<br />

crenulation cleavage in <strong>the</strong> mica-rich layers <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Mertavaara arkose quartzites deforms <strong>the</strong><br />

S 2<br />

cleavage. We can interpret <strong>the</strong> interference figure <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> magnetic anomaly pattern by<br />

assuming that <strong>the</strong> more common east-west-trending folding is F 3<br />

<strong>and</strong> that <strong>the</strong> north-southtrending<br />

folding is <strong>the</strong> youngest, F 4<br />

. The axial planes <strong>of</strong> open folding are subvertical.<br />

The tectonic interpretation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> area in Fig. 6.5.2 is based on <strong>the</strong> interpretation <strong>of</strong><br />

magnetic maps as an interference figure <strong>of</strong> D 1-4<br />

.


9<br />

Figure 6.5.4 P-T diagram depicting <strong>the</strong> metamorphic peak conditions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Pulju</strong> area (Rastas <strong>and</strong><br />

Kilpeläinen 1991)<br />

The rock types <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> area are not suitable for sophisticated interpretation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> metamorphic<br />

grade. Garnet is a common metamorphic mineral in metapelites, but when alone<br />

it does not tell us much about <strong>the</strong> metamorphic conditions. Qualitatively, <strong>the</strong> well preserved<br />

primary sedimentary features <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> lack <strong>of</strong> migmatization indicate that high temperatures<br />

were not attained during regional metamorphism.<br />

Andalusite porphyroblasts that formed in a reaction between staurolite, muscovite <strong>and</strong><br />

quartz have been recognized in <strong>the</strong> mica gneiss interlayers <strong>of</strong> arkosic quartzite at Mertavaara.<br />

Parallel to <strong>the</strong>m are minute oxide mineral exsolutions. As <strong>the</strong> temperature rose,<br />

fibrolitic sillimanite <strong>and</strong> biotite crystallized, <strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong>alusite turned partly into sillimanite,<br />

but muscovite <strong>and</strong> quartz were still stable phases. The recrystallization <strong>of</strong> Al-silicates <strong>and</strong><br />

biotite, which was syn-D 1<br />

deformational, started in <strong>the</strong> stability field <strong>of</strong> <strong>and</strong>alusite, <strong>and</strong><br />

terminated in <strong>the</strong> sillimanite field. In <strong>the</strong> mica gneisses <strong>of</strong> Hotinsaajo, southwest <strong>of</strong> Mertavaara,<br />

chlorite decomposed into cordierite <strong>and</strong> staurolite, which <strong>the</strong>n reacted to form biotite<br />

<strong>and</strong> fibrolite parallel to S 1<br />

; finally, garnet crystals were formed from biotite <strong>and</strong> fibrolite.<br />

Zoned Ca-rich plagioclase that cystallized during D 1<br />

contains local remnants <strong>of</strong> staurolite<br />

in its cores. However, abundant small plagioclase inclusions in <strong>the</strong> garnet porphyroblasts<br />

indicate that garnet crystallized after plagioclase. The last metamorphic feature is <strong>the</strong><br />

growth <strong>of</strong> biotite flakes almost perpendicular to <strong>the</strong> biotite <strong>of</strong> S 1<br />

foliation. A related late<br />

feature is <strong>the</strong> growth <strong>of</strong> chlorite in <strong>the</strong> cracks <strong>of</strong> plagioclase <strong>and</strong> garnet.<br />

The amphibole-chlorite <strong>rocks</strong> <strong>of</strong> Mertavaara commonly contain long metamorphic<br />

blades <strong>of</strong> olivine porphyroblasts parallel to S 1<br />

. D 2<br />

deformed <strong>the</strong> olivine porphyroblasts.<br />

The mineral assemblages <strong>and</strong> reactions in pelitic <strong>rocks</strong> imply that metamorphism was<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> intermediate grade (Winkler 1976) <strong>and</strong> syn-D 1<br />

. Decomposition <strong>of</strong> staurolite, <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>and</strong>alusite-sillimanite reaction <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> muscovite-quartz stability field define <strong>the</strong> peak<br />

metamorphic PT conditions to ca. 3.5 kb <strong>and</strong> 600-650°C (Fig. 6.5.4).<br />

The study <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> structural geology <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Pahtavuoma area, Kittilä, by Koistinen <strong>and</strong><br />

Virransalo (1985) deals with <strong>the</strong> metavolcanics <strong>and</strong> metsediments <strong>of</strong> a typical CLGB area<br />

ca. 40 km south <strong>of</strong> <strong>Pulju</strong>, but <strong>the</strong> authors also briefly describe <strong>the</strong> <strong>Pulju</strong> Belt. They consider<br />

that <strong>the</strong> deformation history <strong>of</strong> both areas can be correlated despite <strong>the</strong> higher metamorphic


10<br />

grade at <strong>Pulju</strong>. They also suggest that both areas belong to <strong>the</strong> same tectonic megablock <strong>and</strong><br />

cannot find any structural features indicating a difference in <strong>the</strong>ir deformation ages. However,<br />

Rastas <strong>and</strong> Kilpeläinen (1991) demonstrated that S 1<br />

foliation predominates in <strong>the</strong> <strong>Pulju</strong><br />

Belt <strong>and</strong> S 2<br />

in <strong>the</strong> Sirkka-Pahtavuoma area. They pointed out that <strong>the</strong> difference might be<br />

subjective, as one emphasizes a feature more dominant than <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r, or that <strong>the</strong> difference<br />

really does exist <strong>and</strong> that <strong>the</strong> <strong>Pulju</strong> Belt was metamorphosed earlier as regards deformation<br />

phases.<br />

In <strong>the</strong>ir structural study <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> CLGB, Ward et al. (1989) considered that <strong>the</strong> belt underwent<br />

early north-verging deformation opposite in polarity to <strong>the</strong> granulite deformation<br />

that thrust <strong>the</strong> North Lapl<strong>and</strong> granulite belt at least 125 km in a sou<strong>the</strong>ast direction (Marker<br />

1988). As <strong>the</strong> S 1<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Pulju</strong> Belt is subparallel to <strong>the</strong> primary bedding, <strong>the</strong> first deformation<br />

phase was overthrusting in character, but <strong>the</strong> direction can no longer be determined.<br />

The structures <strong>of</strong> D 2<br />

are flat-lying <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> shallow dip <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> axial plane <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> S 2<br />

foliation<br />

is to <strong>the</strong> northwest, indicating a sou<strong>the</strong>ast-vergent overthrust. Nei<strong>the</strong>r <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se fit <strong>the</strong> nor<strong>the</strong>ast<br />

- or southwest-trending thrust patterns that deformed <strong>the</strong> CLGB or <strong>the</strong> granulite arch.<br />

However, <strong>the</strong> southwestern margin <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Pulju</strong> Belt can be interpreted as a tectonic thrust<br />

zone dipping to <strong>the</strong> southwest, <strong>and</strong> thus it is consistent with <strong>the</strong> regional clockwise torque<br />

caused by granulite deformation as proposed by Ward et al. (1989).<br />

A deep seismic POLAR traverse (Gaál et al. 1989) across <strong>the</strong> CLGB indicates that <strong>the</strong><br />

belt is ra<strong>the</strong>r shallow, only 5-7 km deep, lying on an Archaean granitoid basement. The <strong>Pulju</strong><br />

Belt was not included in <strong>the</strong> seismic pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>and</strong> its vertical extent is not known. The<br />

syntectonic Hetta granitoid is a wide, oval body trending roughly north-south, <strong>and</strong> on <strong>the</strong><br />

basis <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> gently dipping structures <strong>and</strong> numerous intersecting granitoid veins, <strong>the</strong> <strong>Pulju</strong><br />

Belt is here interpreted as a shallow sheet lying in a flat position at <strong>the</strong> sou<strong>the</strong>rn end <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

granitoid batholith. Geophysics indicates that <strong>the</strong> northwestern margin is <strong>the</strong> thinnest part<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> schist belt, which peters out as scattered remnants in <strong>the</strong> intruding granite. The shallow<br />

dip <strong>of</strong> fold planes <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> gently plunging axes are responsible for <strong>the</strong> interference<br />

structure depicted on <strong>the</strong> geological map (Fig. 6.5.2).<br />

In conclusion, <strong>the</strong> <strong>Pulju</strong> volcanic-sedimentary sequence underwent a complex structural<br />

evolution combined with metamorphic recrystallization. Hydro<strong>the</strong>rmal alteration occurred<br />

in several stages, starting with volcanic-hydro<strong>the</strong>rmal <strong>and</strong> diagenetic alterations<br />

before major structural deformation, <strong>and</strong> culminating in syn-metamorphic alteration during<br />

granitization <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> large Hetta batholith. Polyphase deformation, recrystallization <strong>and</strong><br />

alteration processes provide <strong>the</strong> framework for <strong>the</strong> evolution <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sequence.<br />

6.5.2.4 Stratigraphy <strong>and</strong> rock sequence<br />

The complex polyphase deformation <strong>and</strong> poor outcropping <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> area render detailed study<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> stratigraphic succession difficult. Although reliable younging directions are visible<br />

only in <strong>the</strong> outcrops <strong>of</strong> metasediments at Mertavaara, <strong>the</strong> order <strong>of</strong> rock sequences gives us<br />

an idea <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> stratigraphy, which can be supplemented by geophysical surveys <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

geochemistry <strong>of</strong> basal till samples in non-outcropping areas. A stratigraphic scheme initially<br />

presented by Inkinen et al. (1984) is here revised in <strong>the</strong> light <strong>of</strong> outcrop mapping <strong>and</strong> geophysical<br />

data (Fig. 6.5.5). Lithostratigraphically, <strong>the</strong> supracrustal <strong>rocks</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Pulju</strong> Belt are<br />

correlated with <strong>the</strong> Sodankylä, Savukoski <strong>and</strong> Kittilä Groups <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> CLGB. The stratigraphy<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Pulju</strong> Belt is divided into <strong>the</strong> Sietkuoja, Mertavaara <strong>and</strong> Vittaselkä Formations,<br />

<strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> stratigraphic observations, classification <strong>and</strong> correlation are briefly described.


11<br />

Figure 6.5.5 Stratigraphic column <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Pulju</strong> belt; reviewed from <strong>the</strong> scheme presented by Inkinen et al.<br />

(1984).<br />

The basal contact <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Pulju</strong> Belt does not crop out, but Inkinen et al. (1984) described<br />

felsic gneiss outcrops to <strong>the</strong> east <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Belt that, owing to <strong>the</strong>ir migmatitic appearance,<br />

were considered part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> basement complex. The gneisses <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Belt are seldom<br />

migmatized.<br />

Due to exploration activities <strong>the</strong> description focuses on four areas, viz. Mertavaara,<br />

Hotinvaara, Lutsokuru <strong>and</strong> Siettelöjoki, with <strong>the</strong> emphasis on <strong>the</strong> stratigraphic position <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> <strong>ultramafic</strong> members.<br />

The Sietkuoja Formation consists <strong>of</strong> scattered occurrences <strong>of</strong> mafic metavolcanics in<br />

<strong>the</strong> lower part <strong>of</strong> a transgressive continental sedimentary sequence mainly composed <strong>of</strong><br />

arkosic quartzites. Locally green due to <strong>the</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> fuchsite, <strong>the</strong>se quartzites grade<br />

upwards into biotite-b<strong>and</strong>ed quartzites <strong>and</strong> terminate with biotite <strong>and</strong> biotite-hornblende


12<br />

gneisses, which indicate incipient volcanism in <strong>the</strong> succession. The sedimentary rock sequence<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Sietkuoja Formation corresponds to that <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Virttiövaara Formation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Sodankylä Group (Lehtonen 1998). Owing to poor outcropping, <strong>the</strong> mafic volcanics in <strong>the</strong><br />

lower portion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Sietkuoja Formation cannot be correlated with <strong>the</strong> volcanics <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Sodankylä or Onkamo Groups.<br />

The overlying sequences are composed <strong>of</strong> felsic arenitic, argillic <strong>and</strong> chemical sediments<br />

<strong>and</strong> variable mafic <strong>and</strong> <strong>ultramafic</strong> volcanics. Sedimentary <strong>rocks</strong> commonly occupy<br />

<strong>the</strong> lower part <strong>and</strong> volcanics <strong>the</strong> upper part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sequence, but due to low-angle layering<br />

<strong>and</strong> polyphase tectonics <strong>the</strong> order cannot be verified everywhere, <strong>and</strong> hence <strong>the</strong> sedimentary-volcanic<br />

sequence was stratigraphically united as <strong>the</strong> Mertavaara Formation. Drill cores<br />

<strong>and</strong> geophysical maps were used to combine details <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sulfidic <strong>and</strong> graphitic sedimentary<br />

strata, but <strong>the</strong> large areas devoid <strong>of</strong> outcrops leave room for speculation.<br />

In <strong>the</strong> Mertavaara area proper (Fig. 6.5.6), <strong>the</strong> stratigraphic younging direction is northwards.<br />

Here <strong>the</strong> strata <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Mertavaara Formation begin with felsic metavolcanics<br />

interbedded with a relatively thick chert sequence. The large body <strong>of</strong> serpentinite marked<br />

in <strong>the</strong> central part <strong>of</strong> Fig. 6.5.6 is underlain by <strong>and</strong> interbedded with metasediments <strong>and</strong><br />

cherts, <strong>the</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> which is easily seen in electromagnetic surveys due to <strong>the</strong> abundance<br />

<strong>of</strong> sulfides <strong>and</strong> graphite. The serpentinite is overlain by mafic metavolcanics <strong>and</strong> b<strong>and</strong>ed<br />

amphibolites, which are also interbedded (or interfolded) with <strong>ultramafic</strong>s. The extensive<br />

area <strong>of</strong> chlorite-amphibole <strong>rocks</strong> nor<strong>the</strong>ast <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> serpentinite body has been interpreted as<br />

an overlay <strong>of</strong> flat-lying, relatively thin strata, which, owing to a gently dipping fold axis,<br />

F4a, occupy a large area on <strong>the</strong> ground surface. Drilling intersected a small section <strong>of</strong> gabbro<br />

<strong>and</strong> hornblendite, evidently representing a cumulate phase <strong>of</strong> mafic volcanics.<br />

The tectonically complex Hotinvaara area (Fig. 6.5.7) exhibits an interference structure<br />

<strong>of</strong> gently dipping strata folded by nor<strong>the</strong>ast-trending F 2<br />

<strong>and</strong> east-west-trending open F 3<br />

folds. In <strong>the</strong> west, <strong>the</strong> F 4<br />

structure refolded <strong>the</strong> section in a NNE-SSE direction, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

northwest-trending “branch” <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>ultramafic</strong>s in <strong>the</strong> western part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> area is an interference<br />

structure produced by a late thrust folding, F 4a<br />

, interpreted as <strong>the</strong> reflection <strong>of</strong> a<br />

nor<strong>the</strong>ast-verging deformation (Ward et al. 1988). On <strong>the</strong> map <strong>the</strong> <strong>ultramafic</strong> metacumulatesulfidic<br />

sediment sequence is visible as a folded, single stratigraphic unit over <strong>the</strong> whole<br />

area. Sulfidic metasediments are more common in <strong>the</strong> upper contact zone <strong>of</strong> <strong>ultramafic</strong><br />

metacumulates, where calc-silicate <strong>rocks</strong> <strong>and</strong> sulfidic-graphitic cherts frequently alternate<br />

with <strong>ultramafic</strong>s. The uppermost amphibolite (high-Mg metabasalt) <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Mertavaara<br />

Formation crops out in a few places <strong>and</strong> has been met with in drill cores to <strong>the</strong> north <strong>of</strong> this<br />

eastern branch.<br />

At Lutsokuru, F 4a<br />

is subparallel to F 2<br />

, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> stratigraphic younging direction is from<br />

west to east. The sequence begins with amphibolites overlain by two belts <strong>of</strong> serpentinites.<br />

These are interbedded with graphitic-sulfidic chemosediments that pass upwards into felsic<br />

metasediments. As a separate layer higher up in <strong>the</strong> strata, a sequence <strong>of</strong> amphibole-chlorite<br />

<strong>rocks</strong> is overlain by amphibolites <strong>and</strong> a sequence <strong>of</strong> argillic metasediments interbedded<br />

with graphitic phyllites.<br />

At Siettelöjoki, an <strong>ultramafic</strong> stratum was intersected by four shallow drill holes<br />

(Papunen et al. 1979). The stratigraphic younging direction <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> section is to <strong>the</strong> east.<br />

Felsic gneisses form <strong>the</strong> lowermost stratum in <strong>the</strong> drilled section <strong>and</strong> also overlie <strong>ultramafic</strong>s,<br />

but in <strong>the</strong> east <strong>the</strong>y are interbedded with an amphibolite. To <strong>the</strong> east <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> section,<br />

<strong>the</strong>re are outcrops <strong>of</strong> <strong>ultramafic</strong>s that differ in petrography from serpentinites <strong>and</strong> meta-


13<br />

Figure 6.5.6 Detailed geological map <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Mertavaara area; a schematic cross section depicts <strong>the</strong><br />

stratigraphic scheme <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> area (<strong>the</strong> map according to Meriläinen, 1993, <strong>and</strong> Lahtinen, 1979).<br />

peridotites, being metacumulates <strong>of</strong> tholeiitic magma <strong>and</strong> constituting a feeder channel for<br />

related volcanics. Owing to <strong>the</strong> considerable abundance <strong>of</strong> pyroxenes <strong>and</strong> magnetite, <strong>the</strong>y<br />

have high density <strong>and</strong> magnetic susceptibility (Fig. 6.5.8); <strong>the</strong> high magnetic anomalies<br />

combined with high gravity anomalies in <strong>the</strong> belt have been attributed to similar cumulates.


14<br />

Figure 6.5.7 Geological map <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Hotinvaara area; compiled on <strong>the</strong> basis <strong>of</strong> drill core data, geophysical<br />

maps <strong>and</strong> geological observations presented by Lahtinen (1979).<br />

Figure 6.5.8 Density-suskeptibility diagram <strong>of</strong> <strong>rocks</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Pulju</strong> belt.<br />

The internal stratigraphy <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Mertavaara Formation thus varies from one study area<br />

to ano<strong>the</strong>r. The mutual correlation <strong>of</strong> <strong>ultramafic</strong> flows (chlorite-amphibole <strong>rocks</strong>) <strong>and</strong> <strong>ultramafic</strong><br />

metacumulates is a controversial subject. Previous authors (Inkinen et al. 1984)<br />

considered all <strong>the</strong> <strong>ultramafic</strong> <strong>rocks</strong> as a single stratigraphic unit, but here <strong>the</strong> flows <strong>and</strong><br />

cumulates are regarded as separate layers, with <strong>the</strong> lenses <strong>of</strong> komatiitic metacumulates on


15<br />

a lower stratigraphic level than <strong>the</strong> <strong>ultramafic</strong> flows. The <strong>ultramafic</strong> metacumulates are<br />

always interbedded with sulfidic <strong>and</strong> graphitic chemosediments, especially in <strong>the</strong>ir upper<br />

contact zones, whereas <strong>the</strong> <strong>ultramafic</strong> flows are associated with mafic metavolcanics. The<br />

Mertavaara Formation begins with ei<strong>the</strong>r felsic metasediments/metavolcanics (Mertavaara,<br />

Hotinvaara, Siettelöjoki) or a layer <strong>of</strong> mafic metavolcanics (Lutsokuru), <strong>and</strong> terminates with<br />

b<strong>and</strong>ed amphibolites or, more generally, high-Mg metabasalts. The sulfidic sediments <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Mertavaara Formation display similarities with <strong>the</strong> Matarakoski Formation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> CLGB<br />

Savukoski Group. The mafic metavolcanics <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Pulju</strong> area mainly overlie sulfidic<br />

metasediments <strong>and</strong> can be correlated with <strong>the</strong> Linkupalo Formation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> CLGB. However,<br />

because <strong>the</strong>y are commonly also related to <strong>ultramafic</strong> flows or, locally, to felsic volcanics,<br />

<strong>the</strong>y should more correctly be correlated with <strong>the</strong> Sattasvaara Formation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> CLGB.<br />

Ultramafic flows display many similarities with <strong>the</strong> type localities at Sattasvaara, in <strong>the</strong><br />

CLGB, <strong>and</strong> in <strong>the</strong> Karasjok Greenstone Belt, Norway (Barnes <strong>and</strong> Often 1990), but <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>ultramafic</strong> cumulates are uncommon in <strong>the</strong> CLGB. The picritic <strong>ultramafic</strong>s <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> CLGB<br />

have not been encountered in <strong>the</strong> <strong>Pulju</strong> Belt. Felsic metavolcanic <strong>and</strong> sedimentary interlayers<br />

are abundant throughout <strong>the</strong> Mertavaara Formation, a variability that is characteristic<br />

<strong>of</strong> volcanic sequences.<br />

The uppermost Vittaselkä Formation has been met with in only a few outcrops <strong>and</strong> drill<br />

holes, but it is seen on geophysical maps as a uniform area characterized by strong electromagnetic<br />

<strong>and</strong> weak magnetic anomalies. The Formation has been interpreted as consisting<br />

<strong>of</strong> pelitic metasediments interlayered with graphitic gneisses. The geophysical anomaly<br />

pattern indicates a relatively thin, flat-lying stratum. The existence <strong>of</strong> this sequence calls<br />

for supplementary studies.<br />

6.5.2.5 Rock types <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Mertavaara Formation<br />

Sections <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>ultramafic</strong> members <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Mertavaara Formation were drilled at Siettelöjoki,<br />

Mertavaara, Hotinvaara, Aihkiselkä, Lutsokuru, Hotinsaajo <strong>and</strong> Holtinvaara, where <strong>the</strong><br />

outcrops locally also permit mapping in <strong>the</strong> field. However, geophysical maps imply that<br />

<strong>the</strong>se <strong>rocks</strong> exist throughout <strong>the</strong> <strong>Pulju</strong> area toge<strong>the</strong>r with those <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Mertavaara Formation.<br />

Diamond drill cores from Siettelöjoki, Mertavaara, Hotinvaara <strong>and</strong> Lutsokuru were<br />

reinvestigated for this study, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> descriptions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Hotinvaara <strong>and</strong> Mertavaara Formations<br />

are based on <strong>the</strong>m.<br />

Felsic gneisses, composed mainly <strong>of</strong> quartz, feldspars, muscovite <strong>and</strong> biotite in variable<br />

proportions, are abundant constituents <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Mertavaara Formation. The composition<br />

ranges from leucocratic quartz-feldspar rock <strong>of</strong> felsic metavolcanic origin to biotite-rich,<br />

b<strong>and</strong>ed gneisses with abundant detrital material.<br />

Amphibolites have been met with at different stratigraphic levels <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Mertavaara<br />

Formation. The uppermost thick amphibolite member is b<strong>and</strong>ed, but interlayers <strong>of</strong> more<br />

homogeneous or amygdaloidal modifications are locally present in cherts <strong>and</strong> felsic gneisses<br />

in <strong>the</strong> middle <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Formation. Plagioclase (<strong>and</strong>esine) <strong>and</strong> green hornblende are <strong>the</strong> main<br />

minerals, but cummingtonite, diopside, biotite <strong>and</strong> epidote are also common in places. The<br />

b<strong>and</strong>ing is due to variations in plagioclase <strong>and</strong> hornblende, but diopside <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r calc-silicate<br />

b<strong>and</strong>s also occur. Quartz-bearing felsic fragments up to 1 cm across <strong>and</strong> carbonateepidote<br />

amygdales are rare remnants <strong>of</strong> volcaniclastic structures. Uralitized relics <strong>of</strong>


16<br />

clinopyroxene phenocrysts are frequent in hornblende-rich layers. Amphibolites were primarily<br />

mafic metavolcanics, ei<strong>the</strong>r homogeneous lavas or layered tuffs <strong>and</strong> tuffites.<br />

In a few drill cores from Mertavaara <strong>and</strong> Hotinvaara, homogeneous hornblende gabbros<br />

<strong>and</strong> hornblendites exist toge<strong>the</strong>r with amphibolites. Hornblendites frequently contain<br />

pseudomorphs after clino- <strong>and</strong> orthopyroxene, indicating pyroxenitic origin. They have been<br />

interpreted as fractionated portions <strong>of</strong> thick mafic lava flows or lava lakes, where ponded<br />

lava was fractionated under tranquil, near-surface conditions. The gabbros <strong>and</strong> hornblendites<br />

are <strong>of</strong>ten totally recrystallized <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> primary textures obliterated, but <strong>the</strong> <strong>ultramafic</strong>,<br />

probably tholeiitic, metacumulate <strong>of</strong> Siettelöjoki is characterized by well preserved<br />

primary cumulus textures <strong>of</strong> uralitized pyroxenes. Abundant disseminated magnetite <strong>and</strong><br />

ilmenite were formed during metamorphic alteration, <strong>and</strong> hence <strong>the</strong> magnetic susceptibility<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> rock is high .<br />

Calc-silicate <strong>rocks</strong>, cherty quartzites <strong>and</strong> sulfide-graphite schists exist toge<strong>the</strong>r as a<br />

“chert member”. Cherts with abundant sulfides <strong>and</strong> graphite are spatially associated <strong>and</strong><br />

frequently interlayered with <strong>the</strong> <strong>ultramafic</strong> cumulates. In <strong>the</strong> lower part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Mertavaara<br />

Formation at Mertavaara, drilling intersected a considerable section <strong>of</strong> cherts, but folding<br />

<strong>of</strong> a flat-lying stratum evidently enhanced <strong>the</strong> thickness. The layers are <strong>of</strong>ten only a few<br />

meters thick. Because <strong>of</strong> persistent sulfide <strong>and</strong> graphite contents, <strong>the</strong>y are revealed by <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

magnetic <strong>and</strong> electromagnetic anomalies, even in areas covered by Quaternary overburden.<br />

The layered calc-silicate <strong>rocks</strong> are composed <strong>of</strong> coarse-grained diopside, tremolite,<br />

plagioclase (An40-45) <strong>and</strong> carbonates <strong>and</strong> locally <strong>of</strong> quartz, chlorite, microcline, garnet<br />

(grossularite) <strong>and</strong> clinozoisite. In some localities, <strong>the</strong>re is pure albite instead <strong>of</strong> oligoclase.<br />

Sericite <strong>and</strong> clinozoisite are secondary hydrous minerals after plagioclase. At <strong>the</strong> northwestern<br />

margin <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Belt, calc-silicate <strong>rocks</strong> associated with granite pegmatite veins locally<br />

contain abundant molybdenite as specks <strong>and</strong> scattered flakes. An occurrence was studied<br />

at Kiimatievat but <strong>the</strong> mineral deposit was too scattered to warrant fur<strong>the</strong>r prospecting<br />

(Hakanen 1977). Porphyroblasts <strong>of</strong> potassium feldspar are common constituents <strong>of</strong> calcsilicate<br />

<strong>rocks</strong> in <strong>the</strong> vicinity <strong>of</strong> pegmatites. Grossularite occurs locally as folded b<strong>and</strong>s,<br />

indicating <strong>the</strong> primary layered structure <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> calc-silicate <strong>rocks</strong>.<br />

The thin black-<strong>and</strong>-white-layered cherty quartzites are composed <strong>of</strong> fine-grained<br />

quartz <strong>and</strong> variable amounts <strong>of</strong> graphite <strong>and</strong> sulfides. With an increase in <strong>the</strong> contents <strong>of</strong><br />

calc-silicates <strong>and</strong> biotite, phlogopite <strong>and</strong> chlorite, <strong>the</strong>y grade into calc-silicate <strong>rocks</strong> <strong>and</strong><br />

sulfide-graphite schists with b<strong>and</strong>ed intermediate varieties. Small-scale disharmonious<br />

folding is typical. Oxide facies b<strong>and</strong>ed iron formations are rare, <strong>and</strong> sulfides prevail, even<br />

in <strong>the</strong> iron-rich varieties. Some layers <strong>of</strong> sulfidic cherts in <strong>the</strong> lower part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Mertavaara<br />

Formation at Mertavaara <strong>and</strong> Lutsokuru contain above-average concentrations <strong>of</strong> zinc.<br />

6.5.2.6 Ultramafic <strong>rocks</strong><br />

6.5.2.6.1 General division<br />

The <strong>ultramafic</strong> <strong>rocks</strong> were tentatively divided in <strong>the</strong> field into chlorite-amphibole <strong>rocks</strong> <strong>and</strong><br />

serpentinites-metaperidotites. They are always associated with <strong>the</strong> sedimentary <strong>and</strong> volcanic<br />

members <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Mertavaara Formation <strong>and</strong> commonly interbedded with sedimentary <strong>and</strong><br />

volcanic layers, indicating that <strong>the</strong>y are essential members <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> stratigraphic succession<br />

<strong>and</strong> were thus originally <strong>ultramafic</strong> volcanics.


17<br />

The division <strong>of</strong> <strong>ultramafic</strong> <strong>rocks</strong> into chlorite-amphibole <strong>rocks</strong> <strong>and</strong> serpentinitemetaperidotites<br />

calls for comment. Because <strong>the</strong> <strong>ultramafic</strong>s satisfy <strong>the</strong> definition <strong>of</strong> komatiites<br />

(Arndt <strong>and</strong> Nisbett 1982), as will be discussed in detail in <strong>the</strong> section on geochemistry,<br />

<strong>the</strong> komatiite classification (Hill et al. 1990) can be applied, even though <strong>the</strong> primary<br />

textures have been almost totally obliterated by metamorphism <strong>and</strong> deformation. The amphibole-chlorite-<strong>rocks</strong><br />

are fairly homogeneous <strong>and</strong> foliated, or <strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong>y are layered, fragmentary<br />

volcanic breccias or locally pillowed. They do not, however, show <strong>the</strong> compositional<br />

A <strong>and</strong> B layering <strong>of</strong> typical fractionated Archaean komatiitic flows. In mineral composition<br />

<strong>and</strong> geochemistry, <strong>the</strong>y bear a very close resemblance to <strong>the</strong> komatiites <strong>of</strong> Sattasvaara,<br />

Central Lapl<strong>and</strong> (Lehtonen et al. 1998) <strong>and</strong> Karasjok (Barnes <strong>and</strong> Often 1990) <strong>and</strong><br />

are here considered as weakly fractionated, liquid-rich, aphyric non-cumulate extrusives,<br />

ei<strong>the</strong>r thin flows or volcaniclastics. For simplicity, <strong>the</strong>y are here called (non-fractionated)<br />

komatiitic flows (NFKF).<br />

The chemical composition <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> serpentinites <strong>and</strong> metaperidotites corresponds to that<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> komatiitic cumulates, ei<strong>the</strong>r olivine adcumulates or mesocumulates. However, <strong>the</strong>y<br />

<strong>of</strong>ten contain interlayers <strong>and</strong> irregular masses <strong>of</strong> chlorite-amphibole <strong>rocks</strong>, which complicate<br />

<strong>the</strong> classification. The serpentinite-associated chlorite amphibole <strong>rocks</strong> have a<br />

geochemical signature <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir own. It differs from that <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> NFKF, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>refore <strong>the</strong> exact<br />

division can only be made on <strong>the</strong> basis <strong>of</strong> geochemistry. Reasons for <strong>the</strong> differences between<br />

<strong>the</strong> chlorite-amphibole rock types will be discussed at greater length after <strong>the</strong> description<br />

<strong>of</strong> geochemical features. If <strong>the</strong> mineralogical data on metamorphosed komatiitic flows (Hill<br />

et al. 1990) are applied in <strong>the</strong> classification, <strong>the</strong> chlorite-amphibole <strong>rocks</strong> associated with<br />

<strong>the</strong> serpentinites can tentatively be considered as <strong>the</strong> A layers <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> serpentinites as <strong>the</strong><br />

B layers <strong>of</strong> fractionated komatiitic flows. They are thus <strong>the</strong> result <strong>of</strong> near-surface fractionation<br />

<strong>of</strong> komatiititic melt <strong>and</strong> are here called fractionated komatiitic flows (FKF). The classification<br />

<strong>and</strong> characteristics <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> different types <strong>of</strong> chlorite-amphibole <strong>rocks</strong> <strong>and</strong> komatiites<br />

will be discussed in <strong>the</strong> following.<br />

6.5.2.6.2 Non-fractionated komatiitic flows<br />

The non-fractionated komatiitic flows (NFKF) constitute layers ranging in width from a<br />

metre to several tens <strong>of</strong> metres. Thick sequences <strong>of</strong> NFKF were intersected by drilling at<br />

Mertavaara <strong>and</strong> in <strong>the</strong> eastern <strong>ultramafic</strong> belt <strong>of</strong> Lutsokuru. They occur as independent layers<br />

in many localities without a direct connection with metaperidotites; at Lutsokuru, for<br />

example, <strong>the</strong> eastern belt contains only NFKF <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> western belt FKF. At Mertavaara, <strong>the</strong><br />

NFKF display layering <strong>and</strong> breccia structures that can be interpreted as primary volcanic<br />

structures - tuffs <strong>and</strong> volcaniclastics; a breccia even has fragments <strong>of</strong> <strong>ultramafic</strong> cumulate<br />

in <strong>the</strong> NFKF (Fig. 6.5.9). At Holtinvaara, tuff layering, volcanic breccias <strong>and</strong> pillow structures<br />

are clearly visible. From <strong>the</strong> nor<strong>the</strong>rn extension <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Pulju</strong> Belt, <strong>the</strong> Karasjok Greenstone<br />

Belt, Norway, Barnes <strong>and</strong> Often (1990) described compositionally similar <strong>rocks</strong> in a<br />

similar geological environment with well-preserved volcanic primary textures such as pillow<br />

lavas, volcanic breccias, tuff layers <strong>and</strong> agglomerates.<br />

The NFKF are foliated, green on <strong>the</strong> wea<strong>the</strong>red surface <strong>and</strong> commonly spotted with<br />

brown olivine porphyroblasts ranging in size from 0.5 to 1 cm. Foliation is a pervasive<br />

feature, <strong>and</strong> micro-scale folding is <strong>of</strong>ten present, too.<br />

The olivine content varies, resulting in weak compositional layering, but primary structures<br />

may also be totally obliterated. A search for primary textures in outcrops, drill cores


18<br />

Figure 6.5.9 Breccia structures <strong>of</strong> chlorite-amphibole <strong>rocks</strong> (komatiitic flows); note <strong>the</strong> <strong>ultramafic</strong><br />

cumulate xenoliths. Mertavaara<br />

<strong>and</strong> thin sections revealed only some questionable linear arrays <strong>of</strong> magnetite grains that<br />

could be due to serpentinized elongated olivines; o<strong>the</strong>r indications <strong>of</strong> primary skeletal crystals<br />

are lacking. The <strong>rocks</strong> are totally recrystallized but in all probability <strong>the</strong> primary <strong>ultramafic</strong><br />

extrusives were aphyric, composed <strong>of</strong> tiny mafic crystallites in partly glassy matrix<br />

that were subsequently hydrated to Mg-Fe amphiboles <strong>and</strong> sheet silicates. The present<br />

mineral composition, olivine, tremolite, chlorite, magnetite <strong>and</strong> ilmenite, is <strong>the</strong> outcome <strong>of</strong><br />

metamorphic recrystallization under amphibolite facies conditions.<br />

Magnesian tremolite <strong>and</strong> chlorite (Mg-clinochlore) exist in slightly variable proportions,<br />

<strong>and</strong> with a grain size ranging from 0.1 mm locally up to 1 mm. They form a finegrained<br />

matrix for large metamorphic olivine porphyroblasts, which are <strong>of</strong>ten roundish but<br />

in places also elongated, without definite crystal forms. Large olivine grains are only marginally,<br />

but small grains totally, retrograde, being serpentinized into intensely coloured green<br />

or brown lizardite. They contain numerous inclusions <strong>of</strong> ilmenite, magnetite, chlorite <strong>and</strong><br />

tremolite. The olivine is richer in iron than it is in <strong>the</strong> FKF, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> average Fo content is<br />

as low as 65%, much lower than that in <strong>the</strong> FKF. The Fo-poor olivine was formed by a<br />

metamorphic dehydration reaction from hydrous precursors. Peltonen (1990) proposed that<br />

<strong>the</strong> metamorphic, low-Fo olivine in <strong>the</strong> Vammala metamorphosed <strong>ultramafic</strong> flows crystallized<br />

from chlorite as a result <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> reaction:<br />

chlorite —> olivine + spinel + H 2<br />

O.<br />

This reaction cannot, as such, be applied here, because green spinel is absent from or<br />

rare in <strong>the</strong> assemblage. Carbonates exist in variable amounts as thin veins or accumulations<br />

<strong>of</strong> grains that could be remnants <strong>of</strong> primary amygdales.<br />

The oxide minerals are ilmenite <strong>and</strong> magnetite - <strong>the</strong> ilmenite as separate grains <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

magnetite locally as thin sheets between <strong>the</strong> chlorite flakes. The lines <strong>and</strong> b<strong>and</strong>s <strong>of</strong> finegrained<br />

magnetite in association with olivine porphyroblasts may imply <strong>the</strong> presence <strong>of</strong><br />

grains <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> primary elongated spinifex type, but <strong>the</strong>ir precursors can no longer be recognized.<br />

Pyrrhotite-dominated sulfides exist as dissemination but in considerably smaller<br />

amounts than in <strong>the</strong> FKF.


19<br />

6.5.2.6.3 Fractionated komatiitic flows - komatiitic cumulates<br />

The fractionated komatiitic flows (FKF) contain abundant olivine that is retrograde <strong>and</strong><br />

altered to colourless or green lizardite. The grade <strong>of</strong> serpentinization varies from total<br />

serpentinization to fresh olivine-bearing <strong>rocks</strong>.<br />

A representative section <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> FKF is in drill core Hov-7 from Hotinvaara in Fig<br />

6.5.10. As <strong>the</strong> stratigraphic younging direction is not self-evident in <strong>the</strong> sections, <strong>the</strong> features<br />

indicating <strong>the</strong> stratigraphic top were examined carefully. The interlayers <strong>of</strong> sulfidic<br />

Figure 6.5.10 Drill core data <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> drill core Hov-7, which was drilled through an <strong>ultramafic</strong> cumulate<br />

lrns; for location <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> drilling site see Fig. 6.5.7; Hotinvaara


20<br />

sediments locally display graded bedding, but in some places <strong>the</strong> layers are intensely folded<br />

<strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> facing <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sediment does not warrant far-reaching conclusions. Thin layers <strong>of</strong><br />

serpentinite <strong>and</strong> amphibole-chlorite <strong>rocks</strong> interbedded with sulfidic metasediments <strong>and</strong><br />

calc-silicate <strong>rocks</strong> exist in <strong>the</strong> shallow portion (upper part) <strong>of</strong> drill core Hov-7 <strong>and</strong> have been<br />

interpreted as representing primary thin flows <strong>of</strong> komatiites. The occurrence <strong>of</strong> fractionated<br />

<strong>ultramafic</strong> flows with metasedimentary interlayers <strong>of</strong>ten observed at <strong>the</strong> top <strong>of</strong> thick cumulate<br />

bodies has been used as a stratigraphic guide. Also, <strong>the</strong> gradual change from amphibole-chlorite-serpentine<br />

<strong>rocks</strong> to pure serpentinites in thin <strong>ultramafic</strong> flows can be attributed<br />

to <strong>the</strong> variation in primary komatiitic A <strong>and</strong> B zones; <strong>the</strong> stratigraphic younging direction<br />

is <strong>the</strong>n consistent with <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r observations. The existence <strong>of</strong> thin interlayer sediments<br />

suggests that <strong>the</strong> cumulates were probably not sills, but accumulated from an <strong>ultramafic</strong> lava<br />

flow <strong>and</strong> that <strong>the</strong> mainly chemical sedimentary material precipitated between flows. An<br />

indication <strong>of</strong> a younging direction in <strong>the</strong> drilled section could be that <strong>the</strong> interlayer sediments<br />

lie on top <strong>of</strong> a chlorite-amphibole rock (A zone) <strong>and</strong> that a serpentinite (B zone)<br />

overlies <strong>the</strong> interlayer sediment. Downwards in drill core Hov-7, <strong>the</strong> <strong>rocks</strong> grade into a thick<br />

body <strong>of</strong> komatiitic cumulate that, in <strong>the</strong> deep portion, passes into pure, fresh dunite.<br />

Dunite is a light-green olivine rock without serpentine or sulfide minerals. It is characterized<br />

by blades <strong>of</strong> olivine crystals, up to 5 cm long, enclosing small olivine grains. The<br />

longitudinal parting <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> blades imparts a special luster to both <strong>the</strong> mineral <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> rock.<br />

The difference between FKF-related amphibole-chlorite <strong>rocks</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> NFKF is not<br />

always clear in drill core logging. Two distinctive features <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> FKF are, however, <strong>the</strong><br />

general lack <strong>of</strong> foliation <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> coarser grain size <strong>of</strong> silicate minerals. Moreover, in texture<br />

<strong>the</strong> FKF amphibole-chlorite <strong>rocks</strong> display replacement <strong>of</strong> olivine by tremolite <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

chlorite by phlogopite. The final division, however, has to be made on <strong>the</strong> basis <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

chemical composition <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>rocks</strong> <strong>and</strong> minerals.<br />

The main variation in <strong>the</strong> mineral composition <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> FKF is due to <strong>the</strong> presence <strong>of</strong><br />

amphibole (tremolite/cummingtonite), a magnesian sheet silicate (chlorite/phlogopite) <strong>and</strong><br />

olivine/serpentine. At Lutsokuru, enstatite <strong>and</strong> diopside are <strong>the</strong> main constituents. The <strong>rocks</strong><br />

are a homogeneous grey or green when dominated by serpentine <strong>and</strong> olivine but, with an<br />

increase in amphibole <strong>and</strong> chlorite contents, <strong>the</strong>y become heterogeneous, with light-green<br />

amphibole/chlorite patches in green serpentine matrix, passing eventually into spotty<br />

serpentinite, with dark green serpentine spots in light-green amphibole/chlorite matrix. The<br />

grade <strong>of</strong> serpentinization is not related to <strong>the</strong> amounts <strong>of</strong> amphibole <strong>and</strong> chlorite in <strong>the</strong> rock.<br />

In metamorphosed fractionated komatiite flows <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Archaean succession (Western<br />

Australia as an example), <strong>the</strong> variation in chlorite/tremolite <strong>and</strong> olivine is largely a primary<br />

compositional feature caused by variation in melt <strong>and</strong> cumulus olivine in <strong>the</strong> A <strong>and</strong> B layers<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> flow (Hill et al. 1990). Pure dunites represent primary olivine adcumulates, <strong>and</strong>,<br />

with increasing tremolite <strong>and</strong> chlorite, <strong>the</strong> precursor primary rock grades into ei<strong>the</strong>r pyroxene-bearing<br />

cumulates, meso- <strong>and</strong> orthocumulates or spinifex-textured lavas with a considerable<br />

portion <strong>of</strong> trapped primary melt. In some parts <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Pulju</strong> Belt, however, <strong>the</strong> lightcoloured<br />

amphibole-chlorite mass replaces <strong>the</strong> dunitic matrix, forming an irregular network<br />

in <strong>the</strong> rock. In this case, <strong>the</strong> rock underwent metasomatic alteration during metamorphism<br />

<strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> fluids introduced elements that altered <strong>the</strong> primary olivine rock into more silicic<br />

chlorite <strong>and</strong> amphibole-bearing variants. The alteration will be discussed in a separate section.


Carbonation <strong>of</strong> <strong>ultramafic</strong>s is not common. Talc- <strong>and</strong> magnesite-bearing zones are<br />

intensely tectonized <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> scattered occurrence, mainly in <strong>the</strong> Mertavaara area. Secondary<br />

thin retrograde carbonate veining is fairly common but is not <strong>the</strong>n associated with talc<br />

crystallization.<br />

The textures <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> FKF are totally metamorphic. A 5-cm-long section in drill core<br />

Hov-32 (164 m) displays relict spinifex textures with long, thin blades <strong>of</strong> olivine (sheeted<br />

spinifex), but generally <strong>the</strong> minerals are totally recrystallized.<br />

The olivine grains vary in size from fine-grained to 10-cm prisms, but <strong>the</strong>ir metamorphic<br />

origin is revealed by <strong>the</strong> habitus <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> crystals <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> trace element composition.<br />

Some large olivine grains are porphyroblastic, having small olivine grains as inclusions. The<br />

crystal forms are well developed, especially against sulfides, but amphibole <strong>and</strong> chlorite<br />

exhibit <strong>the</strong>ir own crystal forms against olivine. Serpentine is mainly lizardite, but antigorite<br />

has locally grown as larger flakes in lizardite matrix or as bundles <strong>of</strong> flakes at <strong>the</strong> margins<br />

<strong>of</strong> olivine.<br />

Single euhedral grains <strong>of</strong> amphibole <strong>and</strong> chlorite are enclosed in olivine/serpentine in<br />

dunitic <strong>rocks</strong> or olivine-rich peridotites, but when <strong>the</strong>ir abundances increase <strong>the</strong>y form a<br />

coarse-grained mass replacing serpentinized or fresh olivine grains. Primary magmatic textures<br />

have not been preserved. Owing to <strong>the</strong> metamorphic growth <strong>of</strong> olivine, <strong>the</strong> scattered<br />

amphibole <strong>and</strong> chlorite grains exist both in interstices <strong>and</strong> as inclusions in olivine. Amphibole<br />

is mainly colourless tremolite; cummingtonite is rare.<br />

Enstatite is locally <strong>the</strong> main constituent in <strong>the</strong> Lutsokuru metaperidotites. It is coarsegrained,<br />

clear, without exsolution laminae <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong>ten serpentinized to a varying degree.<br />

Enstatite is not present in <strong>the</strong> Hotinvaara <strong>and</strong> Mertavaara samples, but diopside was met<br />

with in a few samples from Lutsokuru.<br />

Phlogopite is common in dunites <strong>and</strong> metaperidotites. In thin section, it is very pale<br />

brown, <strong>of</strong>ten even colourless. It exists toge<strong>the</strong>r with chlorite or, locally, as interlayers or<br />

interlocking grains with phlogopite cores <strong>and</strong> chlorite margins. The intergrowths do not<br />

display <strong>the</strong> alteration textures or transitional forms typical <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> alteration <strong>of</strong> biotite into<br />

chlorite but seem, instead, to be a result <strong>of</strong> coexisting recrystallization. The chlorite to<br />

phlogopite ratio varies from phlogopite-free chloritic metaperidotites to a pure phlogopite<br />

rock that constitutes a 0.5-m-wide zone at <strong>the</strong> margin <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>ultramafic</strong> body at Hotinvaara.<br />

The accessory minerals are chromite, magnetite <strong>and</strong> sulfides. Locally, chromite grains<br />

form small aggregates, probably indicating primary interstitial chromite accumulation. In<br />

recrystallized <strong>rocks</strong>, <strong>the</strong> aggregates are now frequently enclosed in olivine. A metamorphic<br />

chromite exists in some metacumulates. Irregular in form, translucent <strong>and</strong> homogeneous,<br />

it is without magnetite rims <strong>and</strong> was formed by metamorphic decomposition <strong>of</strong> chromiferous<br />

chlorite. Metamorphic chromite will be described in <strong>the</strong> context <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Kellojärvi<br />

chromites (Appendix 6.7). Magnetite exists as small, independent grains or toge<strong>the</strong>r with<br />

serpentine as a secondary dust. It occurs as interlayers between chlorite flakes or as an<br />

oxidation product <strong>of</strong> sulfides. Magnetite accumulations with interstitial forms are due to <strong>the</strong><br />

total oxidation <strong>of</strong> sulfides.<br />

21


22<br />

6.5.2.7 Mineralogy <strong>of</strong> <strong>ultramafic</strong>s<br />

6.5.2.7.1 Olivine<br />

Outokumpu Exploration did a great number <strong>of</strong> olivine microprobe analyses as part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

prospecting program, but only Fe <strong>and</strong> Ni were determined. The analyses are plotted in <strong>the</strong><br />

diagram in Fig. 6.5.11. In <strong>the</strong> present study, one set <strong>of</strong> mineral analyses was made with a<br />

Cambridge S-200 SEM-EDS at Turku University. The analyses reported in Tables 6.5.1-<br />

6.5.5 were made with a Camebax WDS microprobe <strong>of</strong> CSIRO, Western Australia.<br />

The olivines <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> NFKF are low in Mg, containing only 59.5-61.3 mol.% Fo (Table<br />

6.5.1). The olivines <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> cumulates are richer in Fo, <strong>the</strong> contents ranging from 88.6 mol.%<br />

to 92.0 mol.% at Mertavaara, 90.5 mol.% to 92.53 mol.% at Hotinvaara <strong>and</strong> up to 92.6-92.9<br />

mol.% at Lutsokuru. The values correspond well with <strong>the</strong> Mg values <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> host <strong>rocks</strong>. The<br />

contents <strong>of</strong> Cr <strong>and</strong> Ca are below <strong>the</strong> detection limits. The Mn content varies from 0 wt.%<br />

to 1.01 wt.% MnO, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> correlation with <strong>the</strong> MnO content <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> rock is obvious, as <strong>the</strong><br />

NFKF contain 0.23 wt.% MnO in <strong>the</strong> rock <strong>and</strong> 0.87-1.01 wt.% MnO in olivine; <strong>the</strong> corresponding<br />

figures for serpentinites are 0.16 wt.% in <strong>the</strong> rock <strong>and</strong> only 0.11-0.18 wt.% in<br />

olivine. This good positive correlation is contradictory to <strong>the</strong> negative rock Mn/olivine Mn<br />

correlation described by Peltonen (1990) for <strong>the</strong> Svec<strong>of</strong>ennian metamorphic olivines. The<br />

nickel content is lowest in <strong>the</strong> olivines <strong>of</strong> Lutsokuru, with only 0.0-0.07 wt.% NiO; it is<br />

somewhat higher in <strong>the</strong> Mertavaara <strong>and</strong> Hotinvaara serpentinites, <strong>and</strong> highest <strong>of</strong> all in <strong>the</strong><br />

Fo-poor olivines <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Mertavaara NFKF, with 0.25-0.29 wt.% NiO.<br />

6.5.2.7.2 Amphiboles<br />

Anthophyllite, magnesio-cummingtonite <strong>and</strong> tremolite exist in <strong>ultramafic</strong> cumulates (Table<br />

6.5.2). Magnesio-cummingtonite displays a slightly lower mg’ value (0.868-0.873) than do<br />

<strong>the</strong> coexisting tremolites (0.951-0.968) [Note: mg number or mg’ is <strong>the</strong> atomic ratio Mg/<br />

(Mg+Fe)]. The calcic amphibole <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> NFKF is actinolite, with mg’ values ranging from<br />

0.853 to 0.878, reflecting <strong>the</strong> lower mg number <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> host <strong>rocks</strong>. The calcic amphibole <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> FKF is tremolite with low contents <strong>of</strong> Na, mainly substituting for Ca in <strong>the</strong> M(4) site<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> lattice. Most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Al is in <strong>the</strong> tetrahedral site; <strong>the</strong> small amount in <strong>the</strong> octahedral<br />

site corresponds to <strong>the</strong> amount <strong>of</strong> Na in <strong>the</strong> M(4) site (Table 6.5.2).<br />

The chemical composition <strong>of</strong> calcic amphibole has been used as a pressure indicator<br />

in <strong>the</strong> metamorphic assemblages in which Na is buffered by <strong>the</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> albite, Al by<br />

chlorite <strong>and</strong> f O2<br />

by magnetite (Brown 1977, Bird et al. 1984). Because <strong>the</strong> <strong>ultramafic</strong> <strong>rocks</strong><br />

have low concentrations <strong>of</strong> Na, <strong>the</strong> geobarometer gives only minimum pressures, but apparent<br />

maximum values <strong>of</strong> 2.6-2.8 kb were calculated for <strong>the</strong> FKF <strong>and</strong> NFKF <strong>of</strong> Mertavaara,<br />

3.2-3.6 kb for <strong>the</strong> Hotinvaara FKF <strong>and</strong> 3.3 kb for <strong>the</strong> Lutsokuru FKF (Fig. 6.5.12).<br />

Consistent with <strong>the</strong> amphibole geobarometer, a higher metamorphic grade was derived for<br />

<strong>the</strong> Lutsokuru area from <strong>the</strong> mineral assemblage containing metamorphic diopside <strong>and</strong><br />

enstatite instead <strong>of</strong> calcic amphiboles.<br />

For comparison, some hornblendes <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> amphibolites <strong>of</strong> Mertavaara were analysed.<br />

They have lower Ni <strong>and</strong> Cr contents <strong>and</strong> a higher Ti content than <strong>the</strong> tremolites <strong>of</strong> <strong>ultramafic</strong><br />

<strong>rocks</strong> (Table 6.5.2).


23<br />

Figure 6.5.11 The diagram depicts <strong>the</strong> variation <strong>of</strong> Ni <strong>and</strong> Fo contents <strong>of</strong> olivines from <strong>the</strong> <strong>Pulju</strong> area; also<br />

analysed olivines from some o<strong>the</strong>r <strong>ultramafic</strong> <strong>rocks</strong> <strong>of</strong> Lapl<strong>and</strong> are presented for comparison. The<br />

numbers refer to target areas presented in Papunen et al. (1977).<br />

Figure 6.5.12 Na(M4) vs. Al(IV) plot for <strong>the</strong> <strong>Pulju</strong> amphiboles; isobars from Brown (1977).


24<br />

6.5.2.7.3 Chlorite<br />

Chlorite is clinochlore with a high Cr content (Table 6.5.3). Alkalis are negligible <strong>and</strong> Ti<br />

is on a slightly lower level than in coexisting tremolite. Chlorite exhibits a considerable<br />

variation in substitution, <strong>and</strong> FeMg -1<br />

, Al 2<br />

Mg -1<br />

, Si -1<br />

, CrAl -1<br />

<strong>and</strong> FeAl -1<br />

are <strong>the</strong> most significant<br />

substitutions. In <strong>the</strong> samples analysed, FeMg -1<br />

parallels <strong>the</strong> variation in Mg# in <strong>the</strong><br />

rock. Moreover, <strong>the</strong> Tschermak type <strong>of</strong> substitution, Al 2<br />

Mg -1<br />

Si -1<br />

, <strong>of</strong> Al has a positive correlation<br />

with FeMg -1<br />

substitution (see Fig. 12). Cr is high in <strong>the</strong> chlorites <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> FKF, up to<br />

3.2 wt.%, <strong>and</strong> lower in <strong>the</strong> NFKF <strong>and</strong> amphibolites, reflecting <strong>the</strong> chromium content <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

host rock.<br />

6.5.2.7.4 Phlogopite<br />

Chlorite is a common secondary alteration product <strong>of</strong> biotite, but at Hotinvaara <strong>and</strong><br />

Lutsokuru phlogopite <strong>and</strong> chlorite exist toge<strong>the</strong>r in apparent equilibrium; evidently <strong>the</strong><br />

concentration <strong>and</strong> availability <strong>of</strong> potassium were crucial for <strong>the</strong> crystallization <strong>of</strong> phlogopite<br />

instead <strong>of</strong> chlorite. Phlogopite also includes more silica <strong>and</strong> slightly less aluminium,<br />

iron <strong>and</strong> magnesium than does chlorite.<br />

The phlogopites analysed are close to <strong>the</strong> Mg end member <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> annite-phlogopite<br />

series (Table 6.5.3). Al is totally in a tetrahedral position. Na is below detection limits, <strong>and</strong><br />

only in a few cases is <strong>the</strong> (XII) site wholly occupied by K atoms. The Ti content is low, but<br />

is, on average, three times higher than in coexisting chlorite. In contrast, chromium prefers<br />

chlorite <strong>and</strong> is, on average, four times higher in chlorite than in coexisting phlogopite.<br />

The absorption colour <strong>of</strong> phlogopite varies somewhat, from colourless to pale yellowish<br />

brown, but no clear correlation with a specific element was detected. The highest absorption<br />

is parallel to <strong>the</strong> (0001) crystallographic direction.<br />

6.5.2.7.5 Pyroxenes<br />

Orho- <strong>and</strong> clinopyroxenes were analysed from <strong>the</strong> <strong>ultramafic</strong>s <strong>of</strong> Lutsokuru drill core<br />

LK-3 (Table 6.5.4). The clinopyroxene is almost pure diopside <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> orthopyroxene contains<br />

6.5-9.6 mol.% ferrosilite component. The pyroxenes are metamorphic in origin.<br />

6.5.3 Geochemistry <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Mertavaara Group <strong>rocks</strong><br />

6.5.3.1 Methods <strong>and</strong> samples<br />

A set <strong>of</strong> 156 samples from drill cores <strong>and</strong> outcrops was analyzed for major <strong>and</strong> trace elements<br />

with combined XRF, ICP-MS <strong>and</strong> INAA methods at <strong>the</strong> XR Analytical Laboratories,<br />

Ontario, Canada. Also at our disposal were <strong>the</strong> assays <strong>of</strong> Ni, Cu, Co, Zn <strong>and</strong> S made on drill<br />

cores by Outokumpu Oy for prospecting purposes.<br />

Average compositions <strong>of</strong> rock types are shown in Tables 6.5.5-6.5.6.<br />

The analyses were made on outcrop samples from <strong>the</strong> Mertavaara area, three drill cores<br />

(Hov-7, Hov-30 <strong>and</strong> Hov-32) from Hotinvaara <strong>and</strong> two drill cores (Lk-2 <strong>and</strong> Lk-3) from<br />

Lutsokuru. For <strong>the</strong> study <strong>of</strong> areal variation, <strong>the</strong> analyses <strong>of</strong> different areas were treated separately.<br />

As <strong>the</strong> main emphasis here is on <strong>ultramafic</strong> <strong>rocks</strong>, <strong>the</strong> geochemistry <strong>of</strong> felsic <strong>and</strong><br />

mafic <strong>rocks</strong> is discussed only briefly.


25<br />

6.5.3.2 Felsic <strong>and</strong> mafic <strong>rocks</strong><br />

Quartz-feldspar <strong>rocks</strong> <strong>and</strong> schists were analysed from Mertavaara. The analysed samples<br />

interpreted as felsic volcanics in origin were selected on <strong>the</strong> basis <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir fine-grained <strong>and</strong><br />

locally porphyritic textures. However, <strong>the</strong> low CaO concentrations <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> high values <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> alumina index, from 0.9 to 1.24, imply a sedimentary ra<strong>the</strong>r than an igneous origin. In<br />

<strong>the</strong> Na 2<br />

O+K 2<br />

O vs. SiO 2<br />

diagram <strong>the</strong> <strong>rocks</strong> plot in <strong>the</strong> field <strong>of</strong> rhyolites; in <strong>the</strong> Zr/Ti vs Nb/<br />

Y diagram (Winchester <strong>and</strong> Floyd 1976) <strong>the</strong>y plot in <strong>the</strong> field <strong>of</strong> rhyodacites <strong>and</strong> trachy<strong>and</strong>esites.<br />

In <strong>the</strong> Ti/100-Zr-Y *<br />

3 diagram (Pearce <strong>and</strong> Cann 1973), however, <strong>the</strong> <strong>rocks</strong> plot<br />

outside <strong>the</strong> calc-alkaline field, towards <strong>the</strong> Zr apex, indicating a sedimentary heavy mineral<br />

accumulation in rock composition. The mantle-normalized spidergrams (Fig. 6.5.16 B)<br />

are characterized by enrichment <strong>and</strong> flat distribution <strong>of</strong> LILE <strong>and</strong> LREE elements <strong>and</strong> relatively<br />

low concentrations <strong>of</strong> Nb <strong>and</strong> Sr relative to o<strong>the</strong>r LILE, <strong>and</strong> also by low P, Ti, Sc <strong>and</strong><br />

V relative to Hf, Zr <strong>and</strong> HREE. The trace element patterns are similar to those <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> CLGB<br />

<strong>and</strong>esitic volcanics <strong>of</strong> Möykkelmä described by Räsänen et al. (1989), who considered <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>and</strong>esites contaminated final members <strong>of</strong> volcanic fractionation sequence. The <strong>rocks</strong> can<br />

thus be regarded as reworked felsic volcanics with a small to moderate detrital component.<br />

Amphibolites represent mafic volcanics, lavas, tuffs <strong>and</strong> tuffites.<br />

B<strong>and</strong>ed amphibolites, which constitute <strong>the</strong> uppermost unit <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Mertavaara Formation,<br />

are tuffitic <strong>and</strong> volcaniclastics in character <strong>and</strong> contain a minor amount <strong>of</strong> sedimentary<br />

material; however, with low TiO2 (0.77 wt.% compared with 1.41 wt.% in <strong>the</strong> tholeiitic<br />

amphibolites) <strong>and</strong> high Cr (650 ppm) <strong>and</strong> Ni (329 ppm) <strong>the</strong>y display a distinct, more<br />

primitive, geochemical characteristic <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> volcanic component. Like <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r primitive<br />

signatures, <strong>the</strong> Mg# [Mg# = atomic MgO/(MgO+0.9*FeOtot)] is high (0.62) compared<br />

with that <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> tholeiitic amphibolites (0.47). The b<strong>and</strong>ed amphibolites are considered to<br />

be variants <strong>of</strong> high-Mg basalts.<br />

The mantle <strong>and</strong> MORB-normalized spidergrams (Fig. 6.5.16 B) <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> massive <strong>and</strong><br />

lava-textured amphibolites display a relatively flat pattern <strong>of</strong> HFSE. In <strong>the</strong> mantle-normalized<br />

diagram, Hf, Zr <strong>and</strong> HREE are high compared with Ti, LREE, Sr, P <strong>and</strong> Sc. As a result<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> high Zr <strong>and</strong> Nb, <strong>the</strong> interelement ratios, such as Nb/La <strong>and</strong> Ti/Zr, are low, evidently<br />

indicating crustal contamination. The Cr <strong>and</strong> Ni concentrations are at about <strong>the</strong> level<br />

<strong>of</strong> MORB. The low Mg-high Ti amphibolites have been considered tholeiitic basalts in<br />

origin.<br />

The high Mg metabasalts differ from <strong>the</strong>ir tholeiitic counterparts in <strong>the</strong>ir higher LILE<br />

concentrations (Table 6.5.5), evidently due to <strong>the</strong>ir tuffitic character <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> sedimentary<br />

material involved. The high peak <strong>of</strong> U is a consequence <strong>of</strong> synsedimentary/volcanic precipitation<br />

<strong>and</strong> is comparable to that in cherts <strong>and</strong> calc-silicate <strong>rocks</strong>, which, as deduced from<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir high graphitic carbon <strong>and</strong> sulfide concentrations, evidently precipitated under low Eh<br />

conditions. Low values <strong>of</strong> Y <strong>and</strong> Sc compared with mantle-normalized V are characteristic.<br />

In magmatic fractionation, Sc is concentrated in clinopyroxene, because a high cpx/melt<br />

distribution coefficient <strong>and</strong> a negative anomaly suggest early fractionation <strong>of</strong> pyroxene from<br />

<strong>the</strong> melt. However, a negative Sc anomaly is characteristic <strong>of</strong> all <strong>the</strong> <strong>ultramafic</strong> <strong>rocks</strong> in <strong>the</strong><br />

area.<br />

Biotite-hornblende gneisses deposited during incipient volcanism constitute a mixture<br />

<strong>of</strong> residual sedimentary <strong>and</strong> mafic volcanic material. Characteristic features are low P <strong>and</strong><br />

Sr values, a large variation in incompatible elements <strong>and</strong> high Cr <strong>and</strong> Ni concentrations. The<br />

spidergrams reveal clear similarities between cherts <strong>and</strong> biotite-hornblende gneisses.


26<br />

Figure 6.5.13 Ternary plots depicting <strong>the</strong> variation <strong>of</strong> chemical compositions <strong>of</strong> felsic, mafic <strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>ultramafic</strong> volcanic <strong>rocks</strong> <strong>of</strong> Mertavaara<br />

6.5.3.3 Non-fractionated <strong>ultramafic</strong> flows<br />

The non-fractionated komatiitic flows (NFKF) were analysed at Mertavaara <strong>and</strong> Lutsokuru<br />

only (Table 6.5.6). The MgO contents <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>rocks</strong>, recalculated to volatile free 100 % oxides,<br />

range from 18.68 wt.% to 26.48 wt.%, with 23.48 wt.% as <strong>the</strong> average. The average<br />

nickel content is 959 ppm, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> average Mg# 0.78, which is much lower than <strong>the</strong> corresponding<br />

value for <strong>ultramafic</strong> cumulates (FKF), but higher than <strong>the</strong> Fo percentage (64)<br />

<strong>of</strong> metamorphic olivines <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> NFKF (Fig. 6.5.21). Mg# = 0.84 was calculated from <strong>the</strong><br />

molecular proportion diagram <strong>of</strong> Mg/Ti vs. Fe/Ti although <strong>the</strong> scatter <strong>of</strong> points does not suggest<br />

a good correlation. A compositional gap in MgO contents exists in <strong>the</strong> variation diagrams<br />

(Fig. 6.5.14) for <strong>the</strong> FKF <strong>and</strong> NFKF analysed.<br />

In an <strong>ultramafic</strong> discrimination diagram based on Australian komatiites <strong>and</strong> mafic<br />

metavolcanics (Rock 1991), <strong>the</strong> high TiO 2<br />

concentrations <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> NFKF transfer <strong>the</strong> points<br />

outside <strong>the</strong> field <strong>of</strong> komatiititic flows although Cr <strong>and</strong> Ni values are well in <strong>the</strong> preferred<br />

limits. However, if <strong>the</strong> average MgO value calculated from several flows refers to <strong>the</strong> primary<br />

melt composition, <strong>the</strong> <strong>rocks</strong> fit well <strong>the</strong> komatiite definition <strong>of</strong> Arndt <strong>and</strong> Nisbet<br />

(1982).<br />

Nesbitt et al. (1979) classified komatiites as Al-depleted <strong>and</strong> Al-undepleted types. In<br />

that classification, <strong>the</strong> chlorite-amphibole <strong>rocks</strong> are geochemically atypical (Fig. 6.5.14).<br />

The concentrations <strong>of</strong> Al are close to <strong>the</strong> level <strong>of</strong> Al-undepleted komatiites, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Al 2<br />

O 3<br />

/<br />

TiO 2<br />

ratio (8.83) is also consistent with <strong>the</strong>m, whereas <strong>the</strong> concentrations <strong>of</strong> Sc <strong>and</strong> Yb are


27<br />

Figure 6.5.14 Diagrams depicting <strong>the</strong> incompatible element vs. MgO in <strong>the</strong> Mertavaara <strong>and</strong> Hotinvaara<br />

metacumulates <strong>and</strong> <strong>ultramafic</strong> lavas. Trend lines <strong>of</strong> Al-depleted <strong>and</strong> undepleted komatiites from Barnes<br />

<strong>and</strong> Often (1990)<br />

at <strong>the</strong> level <strong>of</strong> Al-depleted komatiites. The Ca to Al ratios are close to 1 <strong>and</strong> refer to Alundepleted<br />

komatiites (Fig. 6.5.13). This could, <strong>of</strong> course, be due to metamorphic depletion<br />

<strong>of</strong> Ca, which is a mobile element in alteration.<br />

The relatively small number <strong>of</strong> NFKF samples analysed does not, however, warrant<br />

far-reaching conclusions about fractionation trends. The molecular Mg/Fe diagrams are too<br />

scattered to be indicative <strong>of</strong> fractionated minerals <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir compositions (Fig. 6.5.21). The<br />

irregular variation in composition is due ei<strong>the</strong>r to <strong>the</strong> primary r<strong>and</strong>om mixtures <strong>of</strong> pyroclastic<br />

material with variable amounts <strong>of</strong> melt <strong>and</strong> cumulus crystals or to <strong>the</strong> <strong>rocks</strong> having been<br />

altered in metamorphism.<br />

The chemical compositions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> NFKF <strong>and</strong> FKF are depicted in variation diagrams<br />

<strong>and</strong> spidergrams (Figs 6.5.14-6.5.16 A). The spidergrams <strong>of</strong> mantle-normalized elements<br />

(Fig. 6.5.16 A) display a wide scatter <strong>and</strong> relatively high values <strong>of</strong> low-charge large-ion<br />

lithophile (LIL) elements (Cs, Rb, Ba, K <strong>and</strong> Nb) whereas <strong>the</strong> concentrations <strong>of</strong> incompatible<br />

high-field strength elements (HFSE) are more constant <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir average inter-element<br />

ratios not far from <strong>the</strong> corresponding mantle values. Of <strong>the</strong> elements analysed, <strong>the</strong> light rareearth<br />

elements (LREE) La <strong>and</strong> Ce, toge<strong>the</strong>r with Sr <strong>and</strong> Sc, display somewhat lower mantlenormalized<br />

values than do P, Hf, Zr, Ti <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> heavy REE (HREE) Lu <strong>and</strong> Yb. In this respect,<br />

<strong>the</strong> <strong>rocks</strong> fit <strong>the</strong> classification <strong>of</strong> Al-depleted komatiites. In <strong>the</strong> MORB-normalized<br />

plot <strong>the</strong> high concentrations <strong>of</strong> Cr <strong>and</strong> Ni are striking whereas K <strong>and</strong> Sr are well below <strong>the</strong><br />

MORB values.<br />

The NFKF share many geochemical similarities with <strong>the</strong> Karasjok komatiites de-


28<br />

scribed by Barnes <strong>and</strong> Often (1990), who drew attention to <strong>the</strong> differences between <strong>the</strong><br />

concentrations <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> incompatible Ti-associated elements (TAE) Ti, Zr <strong>and</strong> Sm <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

HREE-associated elements (HAE) V, Sc, Ca <strong>and</strong> Al (see Fig. 6.5.14). The <strong>Pulju</strong> NFKF have<br />

TAE/HAE ratios <strong>of</strong> only about 1.5 to 2, thus resembling <strong>the</strong> nor<strong>the</strong>rn Karasjok komatiites<br />

(pillow lavas <strong>and</strong> volcaniclastics). The Sattasvaara komatiites (Lehtonen et al. 1998) do not<br />

differ from <strong>the</strong> <strong>Pulju</strong> NFKF.<br />

As <strong>the</strong> variation diagrams were too complicated to define <strong>the</strong> mutual correlations <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> elements, factor analyses (obliquely rotated Varimax) were conducted on <strong>the</strong> samples<br />

analysed, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> factors were geologically interpreted on <strong>the</strong> basis <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> element loadings<br />

(Table 6.5.7). The factors with a high loading <strong>of</strong> only main elements were considered with<br />

caution owing to <strong>the</strong> possibility <strong>of</strong> self-correlation between <strong>the</strong> constant sum percentage<br />

values. In all calculations, <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> samples exceeded that <strong>of</strong> variables.<br />

Magmatic crystal fractionation can well explain <strong>the</strong> correlations between elements, e.g.<br />

Ti, Zr, Sc, Si, K, Y <strong>and</strong> La, that are not compatible in early crystallizing mafic silicates. The<br />

effect <strong>of</strong> crystal fractionation manifests itself as high loadings <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> elements on a “residual<br />

melt factor”. On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r h<strong>and</strong>, Ti has no correlation with V in <strong>the</strong> NFKF. Sulfur correlates<br />

with Cu, but very weakly with Ni <strong>and</strong> Co <strong>and</strong> not at all with Zn <strong>and</strong> Pb. Au <strong>and</strong> Bi have a<br />

positive mutual correlation as do Ni, Co <strong>and</strong> As. The results will be discussed in greater<br />

detail in <strong>the</strong> context <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> corresponding analyses <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> FKF.<br />

6.5.3.4 Fractionated komatiititic flows - komatiitic cumulates<br />

6.5.3.4.1 Main elements<br />

Komatiitic cumulates were analysed from Mertavaara, Hotinvaara <strong>and</strong> Lutsokuru. The results<br />

for each <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> areas were treated separately (Table 6.5.6).<br />

Pure serpentinites <strong>and</strong> dunites were considered to represent primary olivine adcumulates,<br />

<strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir geochemistry closely indicates primary olivine composition. The primary<br />

composition <strong>of</strong> cumulate olivine can be calculated from a variation diagram <strong>of</strong> MgO vs an<br />

olivine-incompatible element such as Ti, V, Ca or Al. On that basis, at Mertavaara <strong>the</strong> most<br />

magnesian primary olivine contained 47 wt.% MgO, corresponding to 86.9 mol.% Fo (see<br />

Hill et al. 1990).<br />

In fractionated <strong>ultramafic</strong> <strong>and</strong> mafic <strong>rocks</strong>, <strong>the</strong> fractionated minerals can be identified<br />

with Pearce element ratio diagrams, in which <strong>the</strong> main component <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> mineral is normalized<br />

with an element conserved in <strong>the</strong> melt fraction during crystallization (Pearce 1968,<br />

Russell <strong>and</strong> Nicholls 1988, Stanley <strong>and</strong> Russell 1989). Accordingly, <strong>the</strong> molecular Fe/Mg<br />

ratio <strong>of</strong> an early crystallizing single mineral can be calculated from a diagram in which <strong>the</strong><br />

Fe <strong>and</strong> Mg <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> rock are related to an incompatible element.<br />

For <strong>the</strong> most magnesian Mertavaara samples, Si/V vs FM/V (FM = Fe+Mg) <strong>and</strong> Si/<br />

Ti vs FM/Ti diagrams show that olivine was <strong>the</strong> main fractionated mineral; a molecular<br />

proportion diagram, Mg/Ti vs Fe/Ti, gives a value <strong>of</strong> Fo 90,6 mol.% <strong>and</strong> an Mg/V vs Fe/<br />

V diagram Fo 91.4 mol.% (Fig. 6.5.21). The difference from <strong>the</strong> above value is due to fractionation<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Mertavaara serpentinites, as implied by metamorphic alteration <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

introduction <strong>of</strong> metamorphic tremolite into <strong>the</strong> rock.<br />

Most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Mertavaara samples contain small amounts <strong>of</strong> nickeliferous sulfides. Even


29<br />

Figure 6.5.15 SiO 2<br />

<strong>and</strong> CaO vs. MgO diagrams depicting <strong>the</strong> compositions <strong>the</strong> <strong>ultramafic</strong> flows <strong>and</strong><br />

Mertavaara <strong>and</strong> Hotinvaara metacumulates. Cmpositions <strong>of</strong> tremolite, olivine <strong>and</strong> chlorite are marked for<br />

comparison; symbols as in Fig. 6.5.14.<br />

so, <strong>the</strong> nickel concentration <strong>of</strong> primary olivine can be calculated from <strong>the</strong> MgO vs. Ni diagrams<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> samples with a low S content (Barnes et al. 1988), giving a value <strong>of</strong> 1700 ppm<br />

Ni. The same value can also be obtained from a S vs. Ni diagram as <strong>the</strong> Ni concentration<br />

corresponding to 0 wt.% S.<br />

The Hotinvaara data give 48.5 wt.% MgO for primary olivine, which corresponds to<br />

88.7 mol.% Fo. A value <strong>of</strong> 91.4 mol.% Fo can be calculated from <strong>the</strong> molecular proportion<br />

diagram Fe/Ti vs. Mg/Ti. A Ni vs. S diagram indicates 1320 ppm Ni in a rock with 0 wt.%<br />

S, whereas <strong>the</strong> Ni vs. MgO diagram gives a somewhat higher value, 2066 ppm, for <strong>the</strong> primary<br />

Ni content in olivine.<br />

The corresponding values for <strong>the</strong> Lutsokuru samples are 1500 ppm Ni in olivine,<br />

which, according to <strong>the</strong> Fe/V vs. Mg/V mol.prop. diagram, contains 93.4 mol.% Fo. The<br />

Ti related mol.prop. diagram is too scattered to give a reliable correlation. The MgO concentration<br />

<strong>of</strong> primary olivine, as approximated from MgO vs. Al 2<br />

O 3<br />

, CaO <strong>and</strong> incompatible<br />

element variation diagrams, was 51wt.%, corresponding to 92.2 mol.% Fo.<br />

Because Al 2<br />

O 3<br />

<strong>and</strong> TiO 2<br />

are not compatible in <strong>the</strong> early cumulus minerals, olivine in<br />

particular, it is presumed that <strong>the</strong> whole-rock Al 2<br />

O 3<br />

/TiO 2<br />

ratio <strong>of</strong> cumulates reflects <strong>the</strong><br />

composition <strong>of</strong> melt. In <strong>ultramafic</strong>s, <strong>the</strong> average ratio varies from 14.6 to 43.1, with a considerable<br />

scatter. All <strong>the</strong> values are well above those <strong>of</strong> amphibole-chlorite <strong>rocks</strong> (Fig.<br />

6.5.14) <strong>and</strong> militates against a genetic link between <strong>the</strong>se two rock types. The role <strong>of</strong> sec-


30<br />

Figure 6.5.16.A Rock / primitive mantle (Thompson) spidergrams <strong>of</strong> fractionated (serpentinites) <strong>and</strong> nonfractionated<br />

(chlorite-amphibole <strong>rocks</strong>) komatiitic flows from Mertavaara, Hotinvaara <strong>and</strong> Lutsokuru<br />

ondary alteration processes in <strong>the</strong> composition, <strong>and</strong> especially <strong>the</strong> mobility <strong>of</strong> Al, will be<br />

discussed in <strong>the</strong> section dealing with alteration.<br />

In most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> variation diagrams, <strong>the</strong> scatter <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> analytical values is wider than <strong>the</strong><br />

variation caused by analytical inaccuracy <strong>and</strong> does not follow <strong>the</strong> rules <strong>of</strong> magmatic fractionation.<br />

In fractionated <strong>ultramafic</strong>s, <strong>the</strong> incompatible elements, such as Ti <strong>and</strong> Al, are<br />

accommodated mainly in <strong>the</strong> intercumulus melt portion if olivine is <strong>the</strong> sole crystallizing<br />

phase. Thus, <strong>the</strong> contents <strong>of</strong> Ti <strong>and</strong> Al should increase parallel to those <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r elements<br />

conserved in <strong>the</strong> sequence: olivine adcumulate-mesocumulate-orthocumulate. A good linear<br />

correlation between <strong>the</strong>se elements <strong>and</strong> decreasing MgO is evident, for example, in <strong>the</strong> well-


31<br />

Figure 6.5.16.B Rock/primitive mantle spidergrams <strong>of</strong> metasediments <strong>and</strong> metavolcanics from<br />

Mertavaara.<br />

preserved thick sequences <strong>of</strong> komatiitic cumulates <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Walter Williams formation, Western<br />

Australia (see e.g. Hill et al et al. 1990). Because <strong>the</strong> opx/melt distribution coefficient<br />

<strong>of</strong> Ti is slightly above 1, some enrichment <strong>of</strong> Ti is possible in <strong>the</strong> cumulus crystals if opx<br />

is a liquidus phase. However, <strong>the</strong> Si/Mg molecular proportion diagram does not support <strong>the</strong><br />

existence <strong>of</strong> pyroxene in <strong>the</strong>se samples.<br />

In <strong>the</strong> sequences <strong>of</strong> <strong>ultramafic</strong> samples analysed, some TiO 2<br />

<strong>and</strong> Al 2<br />

O 3<br />

values in <strong>the</strong><br />

TiO 2<br />

vs. MgO <strong>and</strong> Al 2<br />

O 3<br />

vs. MgO diagrams are extremely low, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> existence <strong>of</strong> two<br />

populations <strong>of</strong> samples can be deduced from <strong>the</strong> distribution <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se elements (see Fig.<br />

6.5.14).


32<br />

Figure 6.5.17 Rock/MORB <strong>and</strong> rock/mantle spidergrams<br />

<strong>of</strong> Mertavaara non-fractionated flows<br />

Figure 6.5.18 Rock/MORB spidergrams <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>ultramafic</strong> flows <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Lapl<strong>and</strong> greenstone belt<br />

(Hanski <strong>and</strong> Smolkin 1989, Räsänen et al. (1989)<br />

To explain <strong>the</strong> mutual variations in SiO 2<br />

, CaO <strong>and</strong> MgO concentrations, <strong>the</strong> corresponding<br />

variation diagrams are presented in Fig. 6.5.15. Clearly a mixture <strong>of</strong> olivine <strong>and</strong><br />

an <strong>ultramafic</strong> melt cannot explain a major part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> SiO 2<br />

-MgO variation with a composition<br />

corresponding to that <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> NFKF. This would be <strong>the</strong> case if <strong>the</strong> <strong>ultramafic</strong>s were<br />

mixtures <strong>of</strong> fractionated magmatic cumulus olivine <strong>and</strong> intercumulus melt. The SiO 2<br />

-MgO<br />

variation could be explained if opx <strong>and</strong> olivine were both cumulus minerals. However, <strong>the</strong><br />

distribution <strong>of</strong> Sc contradicts <strong>the</strong> existence <strong>of</strong> magmatic opx because Sc has a distribution<br />

coefficient <strong>of</strong> >1 opx/melt, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>re is no correlation between <strong>the</strong> calculated opx content<br />

<strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> content <strong>of</strong> Sc. If <strong>the</strong> <strong>rocks</strong> are a cumulus-intercumulus mixture <strong>of</strong> olivine crystals<br />

<strong>and</strong> melt only, <strong>the</strong> melt was richer in SiO 2<br />

<strong>and</strong>/or MgO than were, say, <strong>the</strong> NFKF. This<br />

possibility will be discussed in a later section. In fact, however, <strong>the</strong> mutual variation in<br />

olivine <strong>and</strong> tremolite ± chlorite could well explain <strong>the</strong> observed scatter because <strong>the</strong> samples<br />

plot along <strong>the</strong> olivine-tremolite mixing line.<br />

The CaO-MgO variation diagram displays a similar wide scatter <strong>of</strong> concentrations. The<br />

mixing <strong>of</strong> intercumulus mafic melt having Ca/Mg ratios <strong>of</strong> komatiitic flows with cumulus<br />

olivine could explain much <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> variation, assuming post-crystallization resetting <strong>of</strong> Ca.<br />

Even <strong>the</strong>n, <strong>the</strong> tremolite-olivine ± chlorite control lines explain <strong>the</strong> compositional variations;<br />

magmatic crystal fractionation is hardly <strong>the</strong> basic petrological reason for this mineralogical<br />

variation.


33<br />

Figure 6.5.19 Rock/MORB spidergrams <strong>of</strong> metacumulates <strong>and</strong> metasediments in drill core Hov-7. Note<br />

<strong>the</strong> effects <strong>of</strong> amphibole (Ca-Si metasomatism) <strong>and</strong> phlogopite (K-metasomatism) for trace elements <strong>of</strong><br />

serpentinites in <strong>the</strong> lower diagram.<br />

6.5.3.4.2 Trace elements<br />

The variation in <strong>the</strong> trace element concentrations <strong>of</strong> komatiitic cumulates is presented in<br />

Table 6.5.6 <strong>and</strong> depicted as primitive mantle <strong>and</strong> MORB normalized spidergrams in Fig<br />

6.5.16 A <strong>and</strong> 6.5.19. All diagrams show a wide scatter <strong>of</strong> concentrations similar to that already<br />

noted in <strong>the</strong> main elements.<br />

The concentrations <strong>of</strong> many <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> lithophile trace elements were below <strong>the</strong> detection<br />

limits <strong>and</strong> thus <strong>the</strong> inter-element ratios in Table 6.5.6 were calculated only from significant<br />

values above detection limits.<br />

The relatively high concentration <strong>of</strong> TiO 2<br />

in <strong>the</strong> komatiitic flows is not reflected in <strong>the</strong><br />

cumulates, which have very low contents <strong>of</strong> TiO 2<br />

(Fig. 6.5.18). For example, a chondritenormalized<br />

Ti/Zr (N)<br />

value, which is 1.32 in amphibole-chlorite <strong>rocks</strong>, is only 0.30-0.64 in<br />

<strong>the</strong> serpentinites except in some samples richer in Ti from <strong>the</strong> eastern Hotinvaara area, for<br />

which an anomalously high Ti/Zr (N)<br />

value, 1.59, was calculated (Table 6.5.6). A similar<br />

difference between amphibole-chlorite <strong>rocks</strong> <strong>and</strong> metacumulates is shown by Ti/Y (N)<br />

ratios.<br />

Concentrations <strong>of</strong> Zr vary (Fig. 6.5.14) <strong>and</strong> have no correlation with MgO, whereas high<br />

Sm values correlate with low MgO values.<br />

A feature common to all <strong>the</strong> MORB spidergrams is <strong>the</strong> high values <strong>of</strong> Rb, which at<br />

Lutsokuru <strong>and</strong> in drill core Hov-7 are associated with high K <strong>and</strong> Ba. In contrast, Hov-30<br />

to 32 <strong>and</strong> Mertavaara display very low K values. The samples from Mertavaara show a peak<br />

<strong>of</strong> Nb values. All cumulates display high values <strong>of</strong> Cr <strong>and</strong> Ni as do all <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r rock types<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> area except tholeiitic amphibolites.


34<br />

Figure 6.5.20 A Element variation in drill core Hov-7; for rock types see Fig. 6.5.10<br />

Figure 6.5.20 B Rock type <strong>and</strong> element variation in <strong>the</strong> drill core LK-3, Lutsokuru. Note <strong>the</strong> good<br />

correlation <strong>and</strong> anomalously high TiO 2<br />

<strong>and</strong> V concentrations in b<strong>and</strong>ed amphibolites <strong>and</strong> calc-silicate<br />

<strong>rocks</strong>. Tremolite-bearing <strong>ultramafic</strong>s locally display high values <strong>of</strong> Ni/S


Figure 6.5.21 Pearce element ratios (Pearce 1968) <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Mertavaara <strong>ultramafic</strong> lavas (chlorite-amphibole<br />

<strong>rocks</strong> - Δ), serpentinites (<strong>ultramafic</strong> cumulates - +) <strong>and</strong> mafic low-Ti metavolcanics (o); calculated mg#<br />

for different rock sequences are indicated. The ratio 1:2 in Si/Ti vs. FM/Ti diagram indicates that olivine<br />

has been <strong>the</strong> only fractionated mineral in <strong>the</strong> cumulates<br />

35


36<br />

Figures 6.5.20 A <strong>and</strong> B depict <strong>the</strong> geochemistry <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> variation in composition <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> wall <strong>rocks</strong> <strong>and</strong> komatiititic cumulates for typical drill pr<strong>of</strong>iles <strong>of</strong> Hotinvaara (Hov-7)<br />

<strong>and</strong> Lutsokuru (LK-3) described above. The MgO <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> cumulates increases slightly in a<br />

stratigraphic downward direction, attaining a pure dunitic composition in <strong>the</strong> lower part <strong>of</strong><br />

Hov-7. The elements combined with <strong>the</strong> interstitial melt fraction <strong>the</strong>refore decrease, indicating<br />

<strong>the</strong> primary meso- to adcumulate nature <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> cumulate. Only at a depth <strong>of</strong> 140-150<br />

m do TiO 2<br />

, Al 2<br />

O 3<br />

<strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> incompatible elements attain higher values; an interesting peak<br />

<strong>of</strong> sulfur <strong>and</strong> sulfide-bound elements is noted at <strong>the</strong> same level. Combination <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se two<br />

groups <strong>of</strong> elements indicates <strong>the</strong> existence <strong>of</strong> primary intercumulus melt that was enriched<br />

in magmatic sulfides, too. The composition <strong>and</strong> characteristics <strong>of</strong> sulfides are discussed in<br />

a separate section.<br />

The mutual ratios <strong>of</strong> olivine-incompatible elements vary along <strong>the</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>iles. The Al 2<br />

O 3<br />

/<br />

TiO 2<br />

ratio, for instance, displays a slight zoning in <strong>the</strong> komatiitic cumulates <strong>of</strong> Lutsokuru<br />

that is due ei<strong>the</strong>r to variation in <strong>the</strong> composition <strong>of</strong> primary cumulus minerals or to secondary<br />

alteration <strong>and</strong> mobilization <strong>of</strong> ei<strong>the</strong>r Al or Ti. Al has a slightly higher crystal/melt distribution<br />

coefficient for pyroxenes than has Ti, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Al 2<br />

O 3<br />

/TiO 2<br />

ratio may thus increase<br />

in <strong>the</strong> pyroxene-bearing cumulates. However, <strong>the</strong> main elements do not indicate <strong>the</strong> existence<br />

<strong>of</strong> pyroxene cumulates. Secondary mobilization <strong>of</strong> Al is discussed in <strong>the</strong> section on<br />

alteration.<br />

Potassium displays a wide variation in <strong>the</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>iles, <strong>the</strong> peak values being in <strong>the</strong> phlogopite<br />

<strong>rocks</strong>. They evidently represent intensely tectonized shear zones <strong>of</strong> <strong>ultramafic</strong>s,<br />

where phlogopite crystallized instead <strong>of</strong> chlorite because <strong>of</strong> high activity <strong>of</strong> K in <strong>the</strong> fluid<br />

phase in <strong>the</strong> permeable fracture zone. The presence <strong>of</strong> phlogopite in <strong>the</strong> cumulates is reflected<br />

in <strong>the</strong> increased values <strong>of</strong> K in <strong>the</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>iles, indicating that hydrous K-bearing fluids<br />

percolated throughout <strong>the</strong> cumulate bodies.<br />

6.5.3.4.3 Factor analysis<br />

To explain <strong>the</strong> wide scatter <strong>and</strong> mutual correlations <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> main <strong>and</strong> trace elements,<br />

correlation coefficients were calculated <strong>and</strong> a Varimax-rotated factor analysis was conducted<br />

as described for <strong>the</strong> NFKF. Logarithms <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> percentages were used to avoid overweighting<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> scattered high contents <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> trace elements. Table 6.5.7 lists <strong>the</strong> main factors for<br />

NFKF <strong>and</strong> FKF separately for each <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> three study areas.<br />

The most prominent factor (#1) in all areas is characterized by a high positive loading<br />

<strong>of</strong> SiO 2<br />

, variable weak positive loadings <strong>of</strong> Al 2<br />

O 3<br />

, K 2<br />

O, CaO, Na 2<br />

O, La <strong>and</strong> Sm, <strong>and</strong><br />

strong negative loadings <strong>of</strong> MgO, FeO, Cr <strong>and</strong> LOI. This factor is due to <strong>the</strong> elemental<br />

variation in magmatic crystal fractionation: <strong>the</strong> concentrations <strong>of</strong> Mg <strong>and</strong> Fe <strong>and</strong> Cr decrease<br />

with increasing Si <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> cumulates. If pyroxene-bearing cumulates exist, <strong>the</strong> increase<br />

in silica correlates with <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r pyroxene-associated elements, mainly Ca <strong>and</strong> alkalies.<br />

The positive loadings <strong>of</strong> Ti, Al, Zr, P, V, Sc at Mertavaara <strong>and</strong> Hotinvaara on a common<br />

factor (#2) were explained by <strong>the</strong> intercumulus melt factor. As <strong>the</strong> intercumulus melt<br />

accommodates <strong>the</strong> elements not incorporated in <strong>the</strong> accumulated crystal phases, <strong>the</strong> factor<br />

gets high scores in <strong>the</strong> samples, e.g. orthocumulates <strong>and</strong>, less prominently, mesocumulates,<br />

with high melt proportions. This factor does not occur in <strong>the</strong> NFKF, in which <strong>the</strong> fractionation<br />

factor accommodates Ti <strong>and</strong> Zr. Note that, at Lutsokuru, <strong>the</strong> factor characterized by<br />

TiO 2<br />

<strong>and</strong> Al 2<br />

O 3<br />

also has high loadings <strong>of</strong> FeO, S, Cu, Ni, Co, Pb <strong>and</strong> Pd, typical chalcophile


37<br />

elements. This indicates that sulfides accumulated toge<strong>the</strong>r with intercumulus melt, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

concentration <strong>of</strong> sulfides correlates with that <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> residual silicate melt, a finding held to<br />

be strong evidence <strong>of</strong> magmatic sulfide accumulation.<br />

Table 6.5.7 Results <strong>of</strong> factor analysis (Varimax, orthogonal rotation; due to brevity only <strong>the</strong> principal loadings<br />

<strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir types have been indicated)<br />

Factor<br />

Principal loadings<br />

Mertavaara NFKF<br />

1) Residual melt factor: -MgO, -FeO,- Cr, +SiO 2<br />

, +Na 2<br />

O, +K 2<br />

O, +CaO, +Y, +Ti, +Zr, +Sc, +La<br />

2) Sulfide factor: +S, +Cu, +Zr, +Zn, -Cl, -Sr, -Pb<br />

3) Gold: +Bi, +Au<br />

4) Ni-As factor: +Ni, +Co, -As<br />

Mertavaara serpentinites (komatiitic cumulates):<br />

1) tremolite alteration factor: -MgO, -FeO, -LOI, +SiO 2<br />

, +K 2<br />

O, +CaO, +Pb, +La, +Sm, +Au<br />

2) residual melt factor: +TiO 2<br />

, +Al 2<br />

O 3<br />

, +Zr, +Sc, (+V)<br />

3) sulfide/Mo factor: +S, +Mo, +Zn, +Cu, + SiO 2<br />

, -Cr<br />

4) sulfide/Na factor: +Na 2<br />

O, +S, +Cu, +SiO 2<br />

,<br />

5) +Cr, +Zr, +Pd, +Bi (+V, +Sm)<br />

6) Ni-As factor: +Ni, +Co, +As<br />

7) +Ba, +Cl, +Br<br />

Hotinvaara serpentinites (komatiitic cumulates):<br />

1) tremolite alteration factor: -MgO, -FeO, +SiO 2<br />

, +CaO, +Na 2<br />

O, +Sr, +La, +Ce<br />

2) residual melt factor: +TiO 2<br />

, +Al 2<br />

O 3<br />

, +P 2<br />

O 5<br />

, +V, +Sc, +CO 2<br />

3) potassic alteration: +K 2<br />

O, +Ba, +Br<br />

4) carbonation factor: +CO 2<br />

, +Pb (-Au)<br />

5) sulfide factor: +S, +Ni, +Cu, +Pd, +Co<br />

Lutsokuru serpentinites (komatiitic cumulates):<br />

1) residual melt + sulfide factor: +TiO 2<br />

, +FeO, + S, +P, +Al 2<br />

O 3<br />

,+La,+ Ce, + V, -Cr, +Cu, +Ni,+Co, +Pb, +Pd<br />

2) tremolite alteration factor: +SiO 2<br />

, -MgO, -MnO, +CaO, +Na 2<br />

O<br />

3) serpentinization: +MgO, +Cl, +Br<br />

4) potassic alteration: +K 2<br />

O, +Al 2<br />

O 3<br />

, +Ba, +V, +Sc<br />

Sulfides behave in interesting <strong>and</strong> individual ways in different target areas. The<br />

Mertavaara serpentinites do not display a correlation between sulfur <strong>and</strong> Ni. Instead, two<br />

distinct sulfide factors exist: one with loadings <strong>of</strong> Na 2<br />

O, S, Cu <strong>and</strong> SiO 2<br />

, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r with<br />

loadings <strong>of</strong> Mo, Zn, Cu <strong>and</strong> SiO 2<br />

. As an individual nickel-arsenide factor, Ni correlates with<br />

Co <strong>and</strong> As but not with S. The Mertavaara sulfide factors are interpreted as <strong>the</strong> late hydro<strong>the</strong>rmal<br />

introduction <strong>of</strong> sulfur into a fluid containing Cu <strong>and</strong> Si toge<strong>the</strong>r with Na or Mo <strong>and</strong><br />

Zn. A definite sulfide factor with high positive loadings <strong>of</strong> S, Ni, Cu, Pd <strong>and</strong> Co was established<br />

in <strong>the</strong> Hotinvaara samples, <strong>and</strong> in <strong>the</strong> Lutsokuru cumulates <strong>the</strong> sulfides correlate with<br />

<strong>the</strong> abundance <strong>of</strong> residual melt. In both cases, some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sulfides, at least, deposited in <strong>the</strong><br />

magmatic stage. The origin <strong>of</strong> sulfides will be discussed in a separate section.


38<br />

At both Hotinvaara <strong>and</strong> Lutsokuru, K 2<br />

O exists in a distinct factor toge<strong>the</strong>r with Ba <strong>and</strong><br />

at Lutsokuru with Al 2<br />

O 3<br />

. This is evidently due to <strong>the</strong> existence <strong>of</strong> phlogopite in <strong>the</strong>se target<br />

areas <strong>and</strong> can be interpreted as a postmagmatic hydro<strong>the</strong>rmal influx <strong>of</strong> potassic fluids.<br />

Even though all <strong>the</strong> samples have high contents <strong>of</strong> Rb, this element does not seem to correlate<br />

with K.<br />

The observed correlation between MgO <strong>and</strong> LOI is attributed to retrograde serpentinization<br />

<strong>of</strong> olivine. On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r h<strong>and</strong>, a positive correlation between Br, Cl <strong>and</strong> MgO, also<br />

noted as a distinct factor, indicates that <strong>the</strong> serpentinizing fluids introduced halogens as well<br />

as B, which also displays a positive correlation with MgO <strong>and</strong> LOI. In this respect, <strong>the</strong><br />

serpentinizing fluids have qualitative characteristics <strong>of</strong> marine or connate water.<br />

6.5.3.5 Geochemical classification <strong>of</strong> komatiites<br />

6.5.3.5.1 Non-fractionated komatiitic flows (chlorite-amphibole <strong>rocks</strong>)<br />

On <strong>the</strong> basis <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> field studies, <strong>the</strong> layered or massive amphibole-chlorite <strong>rocks</strong> were<br />

above considered as an effusive phase <strong>of</strong> <strong>ultramafic</strong> komatiitic magma. Except in <strong>the</strong><br />

Holtinvaara area, primary structures seldom warrant resolution <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> volcanic characteristics<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>rocks</strong>, <strong>and</strong> compositionally similar <strong>rocks</strong> elsewhere in Lapl<strong>and</strong>, for example,<br />

at Sattasvaara (Lehtonen et al. 1992) <strong>and</strong> Karasjok (Barnes <strong>and</strong> Often 1990), frequently<br />

display volcaniclastic, breccia <strong>and</strong> pillow lava features. These komatiites are here called<br />

non-fractionated komatiite flows (NFKF).<br />

The major element geochemistry <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> NFKF, as depicted in <strong>the</strong> MgO-Al 2<br />

O 3<br />

-CaO<br />

diagram (Fig. 6.5.13), is comparable, among o<strong>the</strong>rs, to that <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> thin komatiitic flows in<br />

<strong>the</strong> upper stratigraphic level <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Forrestania greenstone belts <strong>of</strong> Western Australia (see<br />

e.g. Perring et al. 1995). The Forrestania thin komatiitic flows were metamorphosed in<br />

middle to high amphibolite facies <strong>and</strong> have mineral compositions similar to those <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

NFKF <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Pulju</strong> Belt; even <strong>the</strong> texture is <strong>of</strong>ten foliated, in contrast to <strong>the</strong> massive texture<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> thicker, fractionated <strong>ultramafic</strong> flows. The thin Forrestania flows occur toge<strong>the</strong>r<br />

with <strong>ultramafic</strong> cumulates or occupy belts <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir own, commonly on higher stratigraphic<br />

levels <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> succession. A lateral <strong>and</strong> upstrata change from <strong>the</strong> komatiitic metacumulates<br />

to non-fractionated komatiitic flows is also evident in <strong>the</strong> <strong>Pulju</strong> Belt, where <strong>the</strong>y exist as<br />

individual layers at Mertavaara <strong>and</strong> Lutsokuru (see Fig. 6.5.6).<br />

The strong foliation characteristic <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> NFKF contrasts with <strong>the</strong> massive texture <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> komatiitic metacumulates. This difference is typical <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> rock associations elsewhere,<br />

too, <strong>and</strong> reflects <strong>the</strong> differences in <strong>the</strong>ir competence in ductile deformation. Chlorite- or talcrich<br />

<strong>ultramafic</strong>s are incompetent compared with massive olivine-rich metacumulates, which<br />

display ductile deformation only in <strong>the</strong>ir marginal parts or along thin deformation zones,<br />

where <strong>the</strong> rock has altered into chlorite or talc schist, probably at a late stage <strong>of</strong> deformation<br />

when olivine had already been altered by retrograde serpentinization. This characteristic<br />

difference in tectonic competence has resulted in misleading interpretations, with<br />

massive <strong>ultramafic</strong> metacumulates being understood to represent an intrusive phase younger<br />

than <strong>the</strong> foliated komatiitic flow sequence, for example, in <strong>the</strong> early interpretations <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

origin <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> “intrusive metaperidotites/dunites” <strong>and</strong> komatiitic flows in <strong>the</strong> Wiluna greenstone<br />

belt, Western Australia (Naldrett <strong>and</strong> Turner 1977), or in komatiitic cumulates <strong>and</strong>


39<br />

flows <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Kuhmo greenstone belt, Finl<strong>and</strong> (Hanski 1986, Piquet 1982).<br />

Deformation <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> lack <strong>of</strong> primary textures make it difficult to assess <strong>the</strong> primary<br />

melt composition <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> NFKF. A weighted average composition calculated for different<br />

extrusive types might give a rough estimate <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> liquid, assuming that no intratelluric<br />

phenocrysts were involved in <strong>the</strong> extrusion. Although <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> samples analysed (11)<br />

does not fulfil statistical criteria, <strong>the</strong> calculated average value is here used as a model <strong>of</strong> a<br />

melt, which thus contained 23.5 wt.% MgO. This value is not far from that for <strong>ultramafic</strong><br />

tuffs <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Karasjok komatiites (Barnes <strong>and</strong> Often 1990) <strong>and</strong> fits well <strong>the</strong> definition <strong>of</strong><br />

komatiites (Arndt <strong>and</strong> Nesbitt 1982). For fur<strong>the</strong>r consideration, note that a komatiite melt<br />

with 23.5 wt.% MgO is in equilibrium with Fo 92<br />

olivine (Hill et al. 1990).<br />

The concentrations <strong>of</strong> Ti, Al <strong>and</strong> some trace elements are not as in typical komatiites,<br />

however, although <strong>the</strong> compatible elements, Cr <strong>and</strong> Ni, are consistent with <strong>the</strong>ir concentration<br />

limits. Barnes <strong>and</strong> Often (1990) classified <strong>the</strong> similar Ti-enriched Karasjok komatiites<br />

as Al-depleted types. They considered that <strong>the</strong> <strong>ultramafic</strong> volcanics resulted from a<br />

relatively small amount <strong>of</strong> decompression melting <strong>of</strong> a rising mantle plume in a rifting<br />

environment when garnet was <strong>the</strong> residual phase, implying partial melting <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> mantle at<br />

pressures greater than 40 kb. Arndt <strong>and</strong> Lesher (1992) concluded that <strong>the</strong> low-Al 2<br />

O 3<br />

/TiO 2<br />

<strong>and</strong> HREE-depleted Barberton-type komatiites are formed by a low degree <strong>of</strong> mantle melting<br />

at pressures greater than 15 GPa (420 km) in <strong>the</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> garnet or majorite. The low<br />

values for Sc/Ti <strong>and</strong> Sc/V in <strong>the</strong> Mertavaara <strong>ultramafic</strong> flow indicate partial melting, with<br />

garnet as a residual phase, because <strong>the</strong> garnet/melt partition coefficient <strong>of</strong> Sc is considerably<br />

higher than that <strong>of</strong> Ti <strong>and</strong> V.<br />

Despite <strong>the</strong> higher-than-average komatiitic TiO 2<br />

<strong>and</strong> trace elements associated with Ti,<br />

<strong>the</strong> <strong>rocks</strong> have o<strong>the</strong>r characteristics <strong>of</strong> Al-depleted komatiites, too. Some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> picritic<br />

volcanics <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Fennosc<strong>and</strong>ian Shield (Hanski 1992, Hanski <strong>and</strong> Smolkin 1987) are extremely<br />

rich in Ti, with values as high as 2.5 wt.% TiO 2<br />

in iron-rich ferropicrites. The NFKF<br />

<strong>of</strong> this study differ from picrites in <strong>the</strong>ir high MgO <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> komatiite-type characteristics<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> compatible elements. The Onkamo Group komatiites reported from <strong>the</strong> Möykkelmä<br />

area, Central Lapl<strong>and</strong> (Räisänen et al. 1989, Lehtonen et al. 1998), display lower TiO 2<br />

values<br />

at <strong>the</strong> same MgO content as <strong>the</strong> corresponding <strong>rocks</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Pulju</strong> Belt <strong>and</strong> have o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

characteristics <strong>of</strong> Al-undepleted komatiites as well. The CLGB komatiites <strong>of</strong> Sattasvaara,<br />

in contrast, show higher TiO 2<br />

contents than typical Al-undepleted (Munro type) komatiites<br />

<strong>and</strong> in <strong>the</strong>ir trace element contents closely resemble <strong>the</strong> <strong>Pulju</strong> NFKF (Lehtonen et al. 1998).<br />

Lehtonen et al. (1998) also report <strong>the</strong> existence <strong>of</strong> LREE-depleted high-Ti <strong>ultramafic</strong><br />

metavolcanics in <strong>the</strong> CLGB, which <strong>the</strong>y called picrites. The <strong>ultramafic</strong>s are compared in<br />

Fig. 6.5.18.<br />

6.5.3.5.2 Komatiitic cumulates<br />

Barnes <strong>and</strong> Often (1990) described massive types <strong>of</strong> Karasjok komatiites, which, due to<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir preserved primary textures, were considered cumulates <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> flows. Their MgO ranges<br />

up to 38.4 wt.% (volatile free), a value that is, however, far below those <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>rocks</strong> considered<br />

to be metacumulates <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Pulju</strong> Belt. The layers <strong>of</strong> massive metacumulates typical<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Pulju</strong> area seem to be lacking in Karasjok. At <strong>Pulju</strong>, <strong>the</strong>y are probably more widespread<br />

<strong>and</strong> abundant than <strong>the</strong> chlorite amphibole-<strong>rocks</strong> <strong>and</strong> are composed <strong>of</strong> variable<br />

amounts <strong>of</strong> retrograde serpentinized or fresh olivine, chlorite, tremolite, enstatite <strong>and</strong>


40<br />

chromite. The most magnesian members are pure olivine <strong>rocks</strong>. Representing primary olivine<br />

adcumulates, such <strong>rocks</strong> have locally recrystallized to coarse-grained dunites. The<br />

primary olivine mesocumulates <strong>and</strong> orthocumulates in <strong>the</strong> Mertavaara <strong>and</strong> Hotinvaara areas<br />

contain chlorite <strong>and</strong> tremolite <strong>and</strong>, at Lutsokuru, also enstatite. The textures are totally<br />

recrystallized, obscure remnants <strong>of</strong> primary spinifex textures having been noted in only a<br />

few localities. The serpentinites <strong>and</strong> associated chlorite-amphibole <strong>rocks</strong> form layers <strong>of</strong><br />

variable thickness, with <strong>the</strong> most magnesian members commonly occupying <strong>the</strong> cores <strong>of</strong><br />

thick layers, as shown by drill core Hov-7 (Figs. 6.5.10 <strong>and</strong> 6.5.20 A). Metasedimentary<br />

interlayers are, however, more common above <strong>the</strong> <strong>ultramafic</strong>s than at <strong>the</strong> lower margin, <strong>and</strong><br />

a slight but regular decrease in MgO upwards in <strong>the</strong> <strong>ultramafic</strong> cumulate sequence is evident,<br />

for example, in <strong>the</strong> well analysed sections <strong>of</strong> Hotinvaara <strong>and</strong> Mertavaara. The graphite-<br />

<strong>and</strong> sulfide-bearing felsic schists are metasedimentary interlayers between metacumulates<br />

<strong>and</strong> show that <strong>the</strong> massive metacumulates <strong>and</strong> interlayer sediments were formed<br />

lit-par-lit, <strong>and</strong> that <strong>the</strong> cumulates <strong>and</strong> sediments deposited alternately. The cumulates are<br />

<strong>the</strong>refore hardly sills; merely basal parts <strong>of</strong> flows in which <strong>the</strong> olivine accumulating from<br />

overflowing lavas forms layers <strong>of</strong> adcumulates <strong>and</strong> mesocumulates. The rare existence <strong>of</strong><br />

preserved spinifex textures <strong>of</strong> tremolite <strong>and</strong> chlorite-bearing <strong>rocks</strong> in <strong>the</strong> upper part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

cumulate sequence suggests a ponded lava flow origin for this sequence. However, <strong>the</strong><br />

possibility <strong>of</strong> cumulate sills must be looked into more closely in follow-up studies <strong>of</strong> all <strong>the</strong><br />

drilled sections. The upward decrease in MgO is due ei<strong>the</strong>r to fractionation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> melt or<br />

to a change from olivine adcumulate to mesocumulate <strong>and</strong> fur<strong>the</strong>r to orthocumulate <strong>and</strong><br />

finally to a rapidly crystallized melt phase <strong>of</strong> a ponded flow. The almost constant Mg number<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sequence favours <strong>the</strong> latter option.<br />

6.5.3.6 Alteration <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> cumulates<br />

It was noted above that <strong>the</strong> structures <strong>and</strong> textures imply secondary enhancement <strong>of</strong> tremolite<br />

<strong>and</strong> chlorite. The geochemical indications <strong>of</strong> alteration will be discussed below.<br />

The regular geochemical variation caused by <strong>the</strong> trapped intercumulus liquid/cumulus<br />

mineral relationship is visible in <strong>the</strong> variation diagrams <strong>of</strong> unmodified komatiites as a<br />

linear increase in melt-associated elements with decreasing MgO content, <strong>and</strong> a linear increase<br />

in olivine-compatible elements (Ni) with increasing MgO. Fractionation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> melt<br />

<strong>and</strong> crystallization <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> less magnesian cumulus minerals after olivine in a closed magmatic<br />

system, as in a ponded lava lake, with or without pulses <strong>of</strong> fresh melt, operates in <strong>the</strong><br />

same way. In Western Australia, such relationships are typical <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> cumulates <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> large<br />

Walter Williams Formation (Hill et al. 1990, Donaldson 1982).<br />

In <strong>the</strong> present samples, <strong>the</strong> minor <strong>and</strong> trace element compositions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> cumulates<br />

vary, but not as regularly as <strong>the</strong>y would if <strong>the</strong> amount <strong>of</strong> trapped intercumulus liquid <strong>and</strong>/<br />

or fractionation alone were responsible for <strong>the</strong> geochemical variation. The variation diagrams<br />

<strong>of</strong> MgO vs. Al 2<br />

O 3<br />

or TiO 2<br />

or o<strong>the</strong>r incompatible elements display a wide scatter, <strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> existence <strong>of</strong> more than one population <strong>of</strong> cases can be deduced. As <strong>the</strong> MgO content<br />

(anhydrous) ranges from 27 wt.% to 49 wt.%, <strong>the</strong> Al 2<br />

O 3<br />

values are in general below 2 wt.%,<br />

<strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> TiO 2<br />

values, even in samples with only 27 wt.% MgO, below 0.2 wt.%. These values<br />

<strong>and</strong> trends are far below <strong>the</strong> corresponding Al 2<br />

O 3<br />

<strong>and</strong> TiO 2<br />

concentrations in unaltered<br />

komatiite ortho- <strong>and</strong> mesocumulates with similar MgO values. However, in <strong>the</strong> factor analysis<br />

<strong>the</strong> effect <strong>of</strong> variation in <strong>the</strong> intercumulus liquid is seen as an Al-Ti (Ca) factor, because


Al <strong>and</strong> Ti are <strong>the</strong> most abundant elements not incorporated in olivine.<br />

In a MgO-SiO 2<br />

diagram (Fig. 6.5.15), <strong>the</strong> points scatter along <strong>the</strong> olivine-orthopyroxene<br />

control line, indicating that <strong>the</strong> <strong>rocks</strong> may originally have been mixtures <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se<br />

minerals. As pointed out above, <strong>the</strong> variation in Sc does not support <strong>the</strong> existence <strong>of</strong> pyroxene.<br />

The observed variation in SiO 2<br />

-MgO cannot even be attributed to <strong>the</strong> mixing <strong>of</strong><br />

intercumulus liquid with olivine because <strong>the</strong> variation trend in Fig. 18 implies a liquid<br />

anomalously rich in SiO 2<br />

<strong>and</strong> poor in Al <strong>and</strong> Ti.<br />

The chemical compositions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> analysed chlorite <strong>and</strong> tremolite coexisting with olivine<br />

are depicted in <strong>the</strong> Al-Mg, Ti-Mg <strong>and</strong> Si-Mg variation diagrams (Figs. 6.5.14 <strong>and</strong><br />

6.5.15), which indicate that <strong>the</strong> mixtures <strong>of</strong> olivine, tremolite <strong>and</strong> chlorite well explain <strong>the</strong><br />

compositions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>rocks</strong> analysed. This is in contrast to <strong>the</strong> magmatic trends, but such<br />

compositions can be reached through <strong>the</strong> alteration <strong>of</strong> cumulate under metamorphic p-T<br />

conditions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> chlorite-olivine-tremolite stability field if excess SiO 2<br />

is available in <strong>the</strong><br />

metamorphic fluid phase. As <strong>the</strong> alteration affected mainly primary olivine ad- <strong>and</strong> mesocumulates,<br />

<strong>the</strong> concentrations <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> trace elements not incorporated in <strong>the</strong> fluid phase remained<br />

at a low level in altered <strong>rocks</strong>. There is, however, considerable variation in <strong>the</strong> elements<br />

in metamorphic fluids. Ti is mainly incorporated in tremolite <strong>and</strong> phlogopite. The<br />

low concentrations <strong>of</strong> TiO 2<br />

in tremolite explain <strong>the</strong> low-TiO 2<br />

population <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> whole rock<br />

analyses <strong>and</strong> are in accordance with <strong>the</strong> tremolite-olivine control in <strong>the</strong> TiO 2<br />

-MgO diagram<br />

(Fig. 6.5.15).<br />

Although Zr is considered an immobile element in hydro<strong>the</strong>rmal alteration, <strong>the</strong> irregular<br />

variation in Zr in <strong>ultramafic</strong>s is here more likely a result <strong>of</strong> secondary readjustment. This<br />

idea is supported by a shear-associated phlogopite rock in drill hole Hov-7 at a depth <strong>of</strong><br />

142.60 m; at 27 ppm Zr, <strong>the</strong> content is more than ten times that in <strong>the</strong> adjoining <strong>ultramafic</strong>s.<br />

In thin section, <strong>the</strong> great number <strong>of</strong> minute zircon inclusions in phlogopite are indicated by<br />

multiphase pleochroic haloes. This phlogopite rock has been interpreted as a hydro<strong>the</strong>rmally<br />

altered sheared <strong>ultramafic</strong>. High contents <strong>of</strong> Rb, Cs, <strong>and</strong> K characterize <strong>the</strong> phlogopitebearing<br />

<strong>rocks</strong>. The behaviour <strong>of</strong> Al is also erratic <strong>and</strong>, for example, <strong>the</strong> ratio Al 2<br />

O 3<br />

/TiO 2<br />

in<br />

<strong>ultramafic</strong>s varies within wide limits. A zonal pattern <strong>of</strong> Al 2<br />

O 3<br />

/TiO 2<br />

can, however, be verified<br />

in <strong>the</strong> <strong>ultramafic</strong> cumulates <strong>of</strong> Lutsokuru (Fig. 6.5.20 B). Al is commonly an immobile<br />

element because in hydro<strong>the</strong>rmal alteration it passes directly from <strong>the</strong> primary phases<br />

into secondary layer-lattice minerals without marked readjustment with <strong>the</strong> altering fluids.<br />

Marshall <strong>and</strong> Mancini (1994), however, observed a mass gain <strong>of</strong> Al 2<br />

O 3<br />

, K 2<br />

O, BaO, Rb 2<br />

O<br />

<strong>and</strong> SiO 2<br />

in <strong>the</strong> alteration zones <strong>of</strong> peridotite around granitic dykes <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Vammala <strong>ultramafic</strong><br />

body. The exchange reactions took place under metamorphic conditions <strong>of</strong> midamphibolite<br />

facies, at about 600°C <strong>and</strong> 4.5 kb along a local D 3<br />

fracture system. Although<br />

<strong>the</strong>se alteration zones are quite thin compared with <strong>the</strong> more regional alteration zones <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> Hotinvaara <strong>and</strong> Lutsokuru <strong>ultramafic</strong>s, <strong>the</strong> gain <strong>of</strong> Al in <strong>the</strong> process is evident. With a<br />

more regional hydro<strong>the</strong>rmal influx <strong>of</strong> granitic fluids <strong>the</strong> process can advance fur<strong>the</strong>r <strong>and</strong><br />

produce wide, regional alteration fronts in which primary olivine has been altered to chlorite<br />

with a hydro<strong>the</strong>rmal gain <strong>of</strong> Al. Tremolite has been noted to replace olivine as a result <strong>of</strong><br />

alteration by silica <strong>and</strong> Ca-bearing fluids. A similar alteration is distinct in <strong>the</strong> metamorphosed<br />

adcumulates <strong>of</strong> <strong>Pulju</strong>.<br />

Hence, here, <strong>the</strong> Al 2<br />

O 3<br />

/TiO 2<br />

ratio is not necessarily indicative <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> primary melt<br />

composition as it is in less altered <strong>ultramafic</strong> sequences.<br />

41


42<br />

In <strong>the</strong> factor analysis, K <strong>and</strong> Ba have high loadings on a common factor, evidently<br />

indicating potassic alteration <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>rocks</strong>. Potassic alteration was not observed at Mertavaara,<br />

but in <strong>the</strong> Hotinvaara serpentinites K 2<br />

O is associated with Ba <strong>and</strong> Br, <strong>and</strong> at Lutsokuru<br />

Al 2<br />

O 3<br />

has a high loading on <strong>the</strong> factor toge<strong>the</strong>r with K 2<br />

O, Ba, V <strong>and</strong> Sc. The metamorphic<br />

formation <strong>of</strong> phlogopite explains <strong>the</strong> gain <strong>of</strong> all <strong>the</strong>se elements.<br />

As pointed out above, <strong>the</strong> geochemical variation diagrams cannot be interpreted on <strong>the</strong><br />

basis <strong>of</strong> crystal fractionation alone. The main variation in <strong>the</strong> chemical composition can be<br />

explained by <strong>the</strong> gain <strong>of</strong> Si, Al <strong>and</strong> Ca in <strong>the</strong> olivine parent rock during <strong>the</strong> metamorphic<br />

crystallization <strong>of</strong> tremolite <strong>and</strong> chlorite. This requires <strong>the</strong> prevailing fluid phase during<br />

metamorphic recrystallization to have had high activity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se elements. In <strong>the</strong> light <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

data so far available, <strong>the</strong> origin <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> fluids can only be assumed, but a probable source is<br />

<strong>the</strong> granitization process that syntectonically reworked <strong>the</strong> surrounding Hetta granite into<br />

its present composition <strong>and</strong> shape. Note that some <strong>ultramafic</strong> samples from Lutsokuru display<br />

W values well above <strong>the</strong> detection limit, <strong>and</strong> that some analyses from Mertavaara show<br />

considerable contents <strong>of</strong> Mo (<strong>the</strong>se elements are not included in Table 6.5.6 because most<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> analyses were below <strong>the</strong> detection limits). These granite-bound elements may also<br />

originate from postorogenic granitoids <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Tepasto type (Haapala et al. 1987), which<br />

display high contents <strong>of</strong> Mo, Nb <strong>and</strong> Rb, typical lithophile trace elements <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> altered<br />

komatiites at Mertavaara, too. Because <strong>the</strong> Tepasto granite was emplaced about 1.77 Ga ago,<br />

it is considerably younger than <strong>the</strong> postulated deformation age <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Pulju</strong> Belt. On <strong>the</strong><br />

o<strong>the</strong>r h<strong>and</strong>, isotope geochemistry (Patchett et al. 1981, Kouvo et al. 1983) indicates that<br />

granites <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Nattanen-Tepasto type are remelted Archaean crust in origin. Their trace<br />

element characteristics can thus be deduced from Archaean granitoids, which were <strong>the</strong> precursors<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> synorogenic Hetta granite, too (see Fig. 6.5.23).<br />

Some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> anions, e.g. CO 3<br />

2-<br />

<strong>and</strong> S 2- , evidently originate from <strong>the</strong> sedimentary sequence,<br />

into which <strong>the</strong>y were captured from decomposing carbonates <strong>and</strong> sulfides by percolating<br />

metamorphic fluids.<br />

The first phase <strong>of</strong> alteration was probably contemporaneous with <strong>the</strong> extrusion <strong>of</strong><br />

volcanics in a marine environment <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir subsequent hydration by ocean-floor hydro<strong>the</strong>rmal<br />

alteration. In this respect, <strong>the</strong> alteration may, to a certain extent, be comparable to<br />

<strong>the</strong> early alteration described by Eilu (1994) from <strong>the</strong> central Lapl<strong>and</strong> Lapponium. There<br />

is, however, no direct evidence <strong>of</strong> early hydration <strong>and</strong> alteration, because metamorphic<br />

recrystallization in <strong>the</strong> <strong>Pulju</strong> area obliterated all <strong>the</strong> igneous <strong>and</strong> early hydro<strong>the</strong>rmal textures.<br />

The partial oxidation <strong>of</strong> sulfides <strong>and</strong> deposition <strong>of</strong> magnetite may have occurred during this<br />

period. The major phase <strong>of</strong> alteration was associated with regional metamorphism <strong>and</strong> tectonics,<br />

<strong>and</strong> especially <strong>the</strong> coeval remobilization <strong>of</strong> old Archaean granites was <strong>the</strong> main<br />

generator <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> percolating fluids that carried silica <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r altering elements to <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>ultramafic</strong>s. This phase <strong>of</strong> alteration occurred close to <strong>the</strong> peak <strong>of</strong> regional metamorphism,<br />

<strong>and</strong> hence <strong>the</strong> secondary mineral association has characteristics <strong>of</strong> middle to high amphibolite<br />

facies, including <strong>the</strong> minerals En-Di-Tre-Kum-Ol, Chlo-Phlog-Antig in varying proportions.<br />

Retrograde serpentinization altered <strong>the</strong> metamorphic olivine to lizardite <strong>and</strong> deposited<br />

secondary magnetite <strong>and</strong> secondary sulfides (valleriite <strong>and</strong> mackinawite).<br />

The alteration has slightly different characteristics in different target areas. Potassic<br />

alteration is typical <strong>of</strong> Lutsokuru <strong>and</strong> Hotinvaara, but is very weak at Mertavaara. Silicification<br />

<strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> associated introduction <strong>of</strong> Ca <strong>and</strong> Al () to form secondary amphiboles <strong>and</strong>


43<br />

chlorite at <strong>the</strong> expense <strong>of</strong> olivine affected <strong>the</strong> whole area. Carbonation is not a pervasive<br />

alteration, <strong>and</strong> talc is a common mineral only at Mertavaara. The retrograde serpentinization<br />

is associated with <strong>the</strong> accumulation <strong>of</strong> Br, Cl, <strong>and</strong>, to a lesser extent, B. This is reflected in<br />

a factor with high loadings <strong>of</strong> MgO, LOI, Br, Cl <strong>and</strong> B. The retrograde serpentinizing fluid<br />

was probably related to marine water.<br />

6.5.4 Sulfides<br />

The NFKF contain sulfides only when in contact with sedimentary sulfide layers, but disseminated<br />

sulfides are common throughout <strong>the</strong> komatiitic cumulates. Pyrrhotite <strong>and</strong> pentl<strong>and</strong>ite<br />

are <strong>the</strong> main minerals. Mackinawite <strong>and</strong> valleriite have been met with only in a few<br />

serpentinite samples from drill cores Hov-30 to 32. Chalcopyrite is rare. The pyrrhotite/<br />

pentl<strong>and</strong>ite ratio varies in <strong>the</strong> sulfide grains, which are <strong>of</strong>ten interstitial to silicates. In<br />

serpentinites <strong>and</strong> in <strong>the</strong> <strong>rocks</strong> formed from olivine adcumulates, <strong>the</strong> sulfides exist as roundish<br />

anhedral grains interstitial to <strong>the</strong> euhedral olivines. Chlorite <strong>and</strong> amphiboles also exhibit<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir crystal forms against sulfides, <strong>and</strong> blades <strong>of</strong> antigorite locally intersect <strong>the</strong> sulfide<br />

grains. The sulfides are oxidized to varying degrees. The sulfides <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> amphibole-rich<br />

<strong>rocks</strong> are fresh, but in serpentinized <strong>rocks</strong> magnetite replaces first pyrrhotite <strong>and</strong> finally even<br />

pentl<strong>and</strong>ite as a result <strong>of</strong> retrograde oxidation.<br />

In <strong>the</strong> serpentinites, which contain veins <strong>and</strong> patches <strong>of</strong> amphibole-chlorite material<br />

replacing olivine, <strong>the</strong> sulfides envelop light-green amphibole-chlorite patches <strong>and</strong> occur as<br />

dissemination in dark-green serpentinized olivine. In sulfide-rich samples, sulfides also<br />

exist toge<strong>the</strong>r with amphiboles, as irregular grains pierced by amphibole needles.<br />

The textures indicate that <strong>the</strong> sulfides have undergone metamorphic recrystallization<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>rocks</strong>, <strong>and</strong>, due to <strong>the</strong> low energy needed to form euhedral crystals, <strong>the</strong> recrystallizing<br />

silicates intersect <strong>the</strong> “s<strong>of</strong>t” sulfides. Retrograde serpentinization <strong>of</strong> olivine was accompanied<br />

by deposition <strong>of</strong> secondary magnetite, which locally replaces <strong>the</strong> sulfide grains.<br />

However, early pre-metamorphic oxidation <strong>of</strong> sulfides has also taken place, because some<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>rocks</strong> with fresh metamorphic olivine contain oxidized sulfide grains as well. This<br />

oxidation is thought to be associated with <strong>the</strong> early postvolcanic serpentinization <strong>of</strong> olivine<br />

The variation in <strong>the</strong> pentl<strong>and</strong>ite/pyrrhotite ratio is shown in <strong>the</strong> geochemistry, <strong>and</strong> a<br />

Ni vs. S diagram <strong>of</strong> Mertavaara displays no correlation between sulfur <strong>and</strong> nickel (Fig.<br />

6.5.22). The highest Ni values are about 2000 ppm, or roughly <strong>the</strong> same as <strong>the</strong> nickel content<br />

<strong>of</strong> calculated primary igneous olivine. Thus <strong>the</strong> sulfide-rich samples are rich in pyrrhotite,<br />

<strong>and</strong> pentl<strong>and</strong>ite is more abundant only in weak dissemination. This feature is also evident<br />

in <strong>the</strong> factor analysis <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Mertavaara samples (Table 6.5.7), in which two different<br />

sulfide factors appear, but Ni has no loading on ei<strong>the</strong>r <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>m. Instead, Ni, Co <strong>and</strong> As form<br />

a factor <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir own, called <strong>the</strong> nickel arsenide factor, which shows up even if <strong>the</strong> content<br />

<strong>of</strong> As is low <strong>and</strong> nickel arsenides are only rarely met with in polished sections. The correlations<br />

between <strong>the</strong>se elements are better than that between nickel <strong>and</strong> sulfides.<br />

The case <strong>of</strong> Mertavaara evidently indicates a secondary influx <strong>of</strong> sulfur during metamorphic<br />

alteration <strong>and</strong> a reaction with <strong>the</strong> host rock to form sulfides. However, <strong>the</strong> sulfides<br />

forming under metamorphic conditions have extracted nickel only from <strong>the</strong> close environment<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> grains, <strong>and</strong> hence <strong>the</strong> nickel content is on <strong>the</strong> level <strong>of</strong> igneous olivine, which


44<br />

Figure 6.5.22 Ni vs.S <strong>and</strong> PGE vs.Ni plots <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Mertavaara <strong>and</strong> Hotinvaara <strong>rocks</strong><br />

was <strong>the</strong> main primary carrier <strong>of</strong> nickel in <strong>the</strong> barren host-rock. The sulfides are more abundant<br />

at <strong>the</strong> margins <strong>of</strong> tremolite-chlorite patches <strong>and</strong> veins, <strong>and</strong> sulfur has no correlation<br />

with nickel. The weakest sulfide dissemination may contain a considerable amount <strong>of</strong> nickel<br />

when calculated to 100 % sulfides, but because <strong>the</strong>se sulfides were not enriched or mobilized,<br />

nickel did not concentrate to form high-grade ores. Accordingly, <strong>the</strong> metamorphic<br />

olivine <strong>of</strong> sulfide-bearing samples displays low contents <strong>of</strong> nickel (Fig. 6.5.22).<br />

The formation <strong>of</strong> secondary sulfides is thus evidently associated with metamorphic<br />

alteration processes. The aqueous fluids originating from <strong>the</strong> underlying remobilized granitic<br />

crust contained ions <strong>of</strong> Si, Al, K <strong>and</strong> Ca <strong>and</strong> migrated through <strong>the</strong> rock sequence under<br />

metamorphic conditions. From <strong>the</strong> sulfidic sediments <strong>the</strong>y captured sulfur liberated by<br />

<strong>the</strong> high-temperature pyrite to pyrrhotite metamorphic reaction <strong>and</strong> probably removed as<br />

polysulfide complexes to <strong>the</strong> <strong>ultramafic</strong> <strong>rocks</strong> in which <strong>the</strong> silica <strong>of</strong> carrying fluids reacted<br />

with serpentine or virgin olivine to form amphiboles <strong>and</strong> chlorite. The reactions changed<br />

<strong>the</strong> fluid Eh-pH conditions <strong>and</strong>, as a result, <strong>the</strong> polysulfide complexes decomposed, <strong>and</strong><br />

sulfide ions were liberated to react with <strong>the</strong> host rock to form sulfide minerals. The sulfur<br />

mobilization <strong>and</strong> reactions took place in hydro<strong>the</strong>rmal systems. Interelement correlations<br />

demonstrate that Cu <strong>and</strong> some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Fe were removed from <strong>the</strong> sediments by hydro<strong>the</strong>rmal<br />

fluids toge<strong>the</strong>r with sulfur, but that Ni <strong>and</strong> Co were captured from <strong>the</strong> silicates at sites


45<br />

Figure 6.5.23 Ni vs. Fe contents <strong>of</strong> olivines in <strong>the</strong> <strong>Pulju</strong> <strong>ultramafic</strong>s <strong>and</strong> Ni in olivine vs. sulfur content <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> rock<br />

where polysulfides decomposed <strong>and</strong> sulfides precipitated. The analyses from Mertavaara<br />

show that nickel was immobile in <strong>the</strong> metamorphic deposition <strong>of</strong> sulfides.<br />

The Lutsokuru <strong>and</strong> Hotinvaara samples differ, however, from those from Mertavaara<br />

(Fig. 6.5.22). The Hotinvaara analyses show a special nickel sulfide factor with high loadings<br />

<strong>of</strong> S, Ni, Cu, Co <strong>and</strong> Pd, <strong>and</strong> at Lutsokuru <strong>the</strong> sulfide factor has positive loadings <strong>of</strong><br />

S, Ni, Co, Pd, Pb, Fe, TiO 2<br />

, Al 2<br />

O 3<br />

, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> trace elements La <strong>and</strong> Ce.<br />

Although <strong>the</strong>re are good positive correlations between Ni <strong>and</strong> S in <strong>the</strong> scattergrams <strong>of</strong><br />

Lutsokuru <strong>and</strong> Hotinvaara (Fig. 6.5.22), <strong>the</strong> individual samples differ in <strong>the</strong>ir Ni/S ratios.<br />

The samples with high contents <strong>of</strong> sulfide nickel display a Ni/S ratio <strong>of</strong> 0.23 at Lutsokuru,<br />

<strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> up to 0.40 at Hotinvaara, but only a few samples with relatively high nickel contents<br />

have Ni/S ratios between 0.15 <strong>and</strong> 0.11, which is a common ratio at Mertavaara. Most <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> samples analysed plot in <strong>the</strong> range <strong>of</strong> 0.2 wt.% to 0.3 wt.% Ni. The contents <strong>of</strong> nickel<br />

are well above <strong>the</strong> values for igneous primary olivine owing to <strong>the</strong> concentration <strong>of</strong> nickel.<br />

The correlations <strong>of</strong> Co, Pd <strong>and</strong> Cu with S are all positive <strong>and</strong> high.<br />

Examples from Hotinvaara (Hov-30 <strong>and</strong> 32) show that <strong>the</strong> Ni/S ratio varies in different<br />

mineralized flows (Fig. 6.5.22). A lava flow intersected by two drill holes contains heavy<br />

dissemination <strong>of</strong> sulfides <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Ni/S ratio is 0.3, corresponding to about 9 wt.% Ni in <strong>the</strong><br />

100 % sulfides. Massive sulfides have been encountered at <strong>the</strong> base <strong>of</strong> ano<strong>the</strong>r mineralized<br />

flow, about 25 m below <strong>the</strong> upper mineralized flow, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> sulfides assay approximately<br />

4 wt.% Ni. Variable contents <strong>of</strong> nickel are due to <strong>the</strong> difference in <strong>the</strong> sulfide-silicate melt<br />

ratio, <strong>the</strong> R-factor.<br />

The most probable mechanism for <strong>the</strong> high Ni values <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Hotinvaara <strong>and</strong> Lutsokuru<br />

sulfides is <strong>the</strong> accumulation <strong>of</strong> nickel sulfides at <strong>the</strong> magmatic stage. However, a late hydro<strong>the</strong>rmal<br />

influx <strong>of</strong> sulfur <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> formation <strong>of</strong> metamorphic sulfides have locally decreased<br />

<strong>the</strong> initially high Ni/S values <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> magmatic sulfides.


46<br />

The good correlation <strong>of</strong> sulfides with Al, Ti <strong>and</strong> incompatible trace elements can be<br />

explained by <strong>the</strong> accumulation <strong>of</strong> magmatic sulfides toge<strong>the</strong>r with <strong>the</strong> intercumulus silicate<br />

liquid in meso- <strong>and</strong> orthocumulates, which contained more trapped liquid than did <strong>the</strong><br />

adcumulates. Cu, Pt <strong>and</strong> Pd are incompatible elements in <strong>the</strong> crystallization <strong>of</strong> olivine <strong>and</strong><br />

will be enriched in <strong>the</strong> evolved late silicate melt. Their use as indicators <strong>of</strong> magmatic sulfides<br />

is questionable, however, because <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir tendency to metamorphic mobilization.<br />

Metamorphic mobilization (for definition, see Marshall <strong>and</strong> Gilligan 1993) <strong>of</strong> disseminated<br />

sulfides <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir accumulation in high-strain zones have been postulated as a mechanism<br />

for <strong>the</strong> formation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> massive sulfides in Kambalda (Groves et al. 1979) or <strong>the</strong><br />

brecciated sulfides in metamorphosed Svec<strong>of</strong>ennian Ni-Cu deposits (see Papunen &<br />

Gorbunov 1985). Here, however, <strong>the</strong> tectonic upgrading <strong>of</strong> sulfides is disputable because<br />

<strong>the</strong> samples with high-grade Ni sulfides are not tectonized <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> sulfide textures are interstitial<br />

disseminations as in o<strong>the</strong>r sulfide types.<br />

During <strong>the</strong> oxidation <strong>of</strong> sulfides, magnetite first replaces pyrrhotite in pyrrhotite-pentl<strong>and</strong>ite<br />

grains, <strong>the</strong> secondary oxidation thus upgrading <strong>the</strong> sulfides. This kind <strong>of</strong> mechanism<br />

is common in weak sulfide disseminations in serpentinites. In <strong>the</strong> sulfides <strong>of</strong> Lutsokuru <strong>and</strong><br />

Hotinvaara, <strong>the</strong> high-grade Ni-rich varieties contain both pyrrhotite <strong>and</strong> pentl<strong>and</strong>ite, without<br />

a marked magnetite content, <strong>and</strong> oxidation cannot be a major factor in <strong>the</strong> formation <strong>of</strong><br />

high-grade sulfides. We <strong>the</strong>refore conclude that some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sulfides inherit <strong>the</strong>ir high<br />

nickel, cobalt, platinum <strong>and</strong> palladium tenors from immiscible igneous sulfide melt trapped<br />

in olivine ortho- <strong>and</strong> mesocumulates. The presence <strong>of</strong> igneous sulfide melt in komatiitic<br />

cumulates makes <strong>the</strong> rock sequence a highly potential host rock for nickel ores.<br />

Sulfide saturation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> silicate melt should leave its mark on <strong>the</strong> geochemistry <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

crystallizing igneous <strong>rocks</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir minerals. The silicate melt will be depleted in elements<br />

such as Ni, PGE, Cu <strong>and</strong> Co, which have a high sulfide/silicate melt distribution coefficient,<br />

if a sufficient amount <strong>of</strong> sulfide melt is segregated. As a result, <strong>the</strong> nickel content <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

crystallizing igneous olivine will be low, a fact that has <strong>of</strong>ten been used as a prime indicator<br />

<strong>of</strong> sulfide saturation. The calculated nickel content <strong>of</strong> igneous olivine at Mertavaara is<br />

about 1700 ppm <strong>and</strong> at Hotinvaara <strong>and</strong> Lutsokuru somewhat higher, close to 2000 ppm, but<br />

in all <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>m it is considerably lower than that <strong>of</strong> olivines crystallized from sulfide-unsaturated<br />

high-Mg komatiitic melts (Smith <strong>and</strong> Erlank 1982, Arndt 1986). To account for <strong>the</strong><br />

Ni depletion <strong>of</strong> olivine, <strong>the</strong> parental liquid must have lost some nickel by fractional extraction<br />

<strong>of</strong> a sulfide melt in an early phase <strong>of</strong> emplacement (see e.g. Barnes et al. 1988). On <strong>the</strong><br />

basis <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Fo content <strong>of</strong> olivine <strong>and</strong> using <strong>the</strong> Fe/Mg distribution coefficients <strong>of</strong> komatiitic<br />

melts, we find that <strong>the</strong> Mg content <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> melt was ca. 18 wt.% at Mertavaara <strong>and</strong> up to 25<br />

wt.% at Lutsokuru (Roeder <strong>and</strong> Emslie 1970, Hill et al. 1990). On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r h<strong>and</strong>, in chlorite-amphibole<br />

<strong>rocks</strong> with 25 wt.% MgO, which were considered to represent a melt-rich<br />

komatiite phase, <strong>the</strong> nickel content ranges from 600 to 1200 ppm, with 950 ppm as an average.<br />

Even if <strong>the</strong> chlorite-amphibole <strong>rocks</strong> have a component <strong>of</strong> accumulated olivine <strong>the</strong>se<br />

values are within <strong>the</strong> broad range <strong>of</strong> Ni <strong>and</strong> MgO concentrations <strong>of</strong> spinifex-textured unsaturated<br />

komatiitic <strong>rocks</strong> (Arndt 1986, Arndt <strong>and</strong> Lesher 1992). A silicate melt in equilibrium<br />

with olivine Fo 92<br />

<strong>and</strong> 2000 ppm Ni should contain 200 ppm Ni if <strong>the</strong> K d<br />

Nisulph melt/silicate<br />

melt<br />

is 10). This value is far lower than <strong>the</strong> lowest Ni concentration <strong>of</strong> chlorite amphibole<br />

<strong>rocks</strong>. The Mertavaara komatiitic flows (chlorite-amphibole <strong>rocks</strong>) thus probably represent<br />

a sulfide unsaturated pulse <strong>of</strong> magma different from that <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> komatiitic cumulates.


47<br />

6.5.5 Summary<br />

The <strong>Pulju</strong> supracrustal belt is a part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Paleoproterozoic</strong> greenstone succession extending<br />

from Karasjok to N. Sweden, Central Lapl<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> Salla. The main stratigraphic units <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

CLGB have been observed in <strong>the</strong> <strong>Pulju</strong> belt, although <strong>the</strong> subhorizontal layering, polyphase<br />

folding <strong>and</strong> scarce outcropping <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Pulju</strong> belt complicate <strong>the</strong> correlation <strong>and</strong> interpretations.<br />

The supracrustal sequence <strong>of</strong> <strong>Pulju</strong> is not so thick as in <strong>the</strong> type sections <strong>of</strong> Sattasvaara<br />

<strong>and</strong> Kittilä areas probably indicating that <strong>Pulju</strong> located at <strong>the</strong> margin <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> rift basin. The<br />

<strong>Pulju</strong> area is characterized by abundant <strong>ultramafic</strong> cumulates that locate stratigraphically<br />

in <strong>the</strong> sulfide- <strong>and</strong> graphite-bearing sedimentary unit, corresponding <strong>the</strong> Matarakoski Formation<br />

<strong>of</strong> CLGB. Ultramafic cumulates are rare elsewhere in <strong>the</strong> Matarakoski Formation.<br />

The cumulates seem to be in a lower stratigraphic position in than <strong>the</strong> <strong>ultramafic</strong> flows. The<br />

flows correspond Sattasvaara-type komatiites, <strong>the</strong>y are not fractionated <strong>and</strong> display frequently<br />

breccia, pillow, tuffitic <strong>and</strong> agglomeratic structures. The Sattasvaara-type komatiites<br />

probably extruded subaereally or in a shallow water <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> eruption could be related to a<br />

vigorous explosion (Saverikko 1983, 1985). It is an open question if <strong>the</strong> komatiitic cumulates<br />

<strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> flows are comagmatic because <strong>the</strong> melt-rich parts <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> fractionated flows are<br />

not easy to recognize due to metasomatic elemental change <strong>of</strong> <strong>ultramafic</strong> <strong>rocks</strong>.<br />

Figure 6.5.23 Schematic representation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> alteration process <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Pulju</strong> belt: Intrusion <strong>of</strong> granitoids<br />

caused fluid activity along zones <strong>of</strong> tectonic weakness. Primarily <strong>the</strong> granitic fluids carried Sr, Pb, La,<br />

Sm, Rb, Ba Br <strong>and</strong> Mo, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> fluids may incorporate additional Ca, Si, Al, K <strong>and</strong> Na <strong>and</strong> possibly also<br />

CO 2<br />

<strong>and</strong> S from sedimentary <strong>rocks</strong>. The fluids reacted in amphibolite facies metamorphic conditions with<br />

<strong>ultramafic</strong> <strong>rocks</strong> to form tremolite <strong>and</strong> chlorite along <strong>the</strong> tectonic zones, <strong>and</strong> serpentine <strong>and</strong> metamorphic<br />

sulfide dissemination in olivine cumulates. Fluids finally crystallized as molybdenite-bearing granitic<br />

pegmatites.


48<br />

During metamorphism <strong>the</strong> <strong>ultramafic</strong> cumulates were altered by granitic fluids that<br />

transported elements from <strong>the</strong> sedimentary layers <strong>and</strong> changed <strong>the</strong> compositions <strong>of</strong> <strong>ultramafic</strong>s.<br />

Tremolite, chlorite, phlogopite <strong>and</strong> ferrous sulfide minerals are <strong>the</strong> results <strong>of</strong> metamorphic<br />

reactions. Pervasive weak sulfide dissemination in <strong>ultramafic</strong> cumulates is <strong>the</strong><br />

result <strong>of</strong> metamorphic reactions, but in addition to metamorphic sulfides also Ni-rich magmatic<br />

sulfides exist in <strong>the</strong> cumulates. The magmatic sulfides are ei<strong>the</strong>r disseminated or<br />

minor massive layers that exist at <strong>the</strong> base <strong>of</strong> <strong>ultramafic</strong> cumulate. Only Ni <strong>and</strong> PGE assays<br />

discriminate <strong>the</strong> magmatic <strong>and</strong> metamorphic sulfides. The metamorphic alteration<br />

reactions occurred in reduced conditions <strong>and</strong> as <strong>the</strong> result also metamorphic chromite was<br />

deposited in <strong>the</strong> decomposition reaction <strong>of</strong> chromiferous chlorite.<br />

If <strong>the</strong> komatiitic flows <strong>and</strong> cumulates are comagmatic, <strong>the</strong> cumulates have lost considerable<br />

amounts <strong>of</strong> nickel because <strong>the</strong> komatiite magma contains 900 ppm Ni but <strong>the</strong> first<br />

crystallizing olivine <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> cumulates only 2000 ppm, that indicates far lower content <strong>of</strong> Ni<br />

in <strong>the</strong> parental magma. The differences in Ni contents could serve as a guide for fur<strong>the</strong>r<br />

exploration <strong>and</strong> research for magmatic nickel deposits<br />

Tables


55<br />

References<br />

Arndt, N.T. (1986) Differentiation <strong>of</strong> komatiite flows. Journ. Petrology 27, 279-301.<br />

Arndt, N.T. <strong>and</strong> Nisbet, E.G. (1982) Komatiites: London, George Allen & Unwin, 526 p.<br />

Arndt, N.T. & Lesher, C.M. (1992) Fractionation <strong>of</strong> REEs by olivine <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> origin <strong>of</strong> Kambalda komatiites,<br />

Western Australia. Geochemica Cosmochem. Acta 56, 4191-4204.<br />

Barnes, S.J., Hill, R.E.T. & Gole, M.J. (1988) The Agnew nickel deposit, Western Australia, II Sulfide<br />

geochemistry, with emphasis on platinum group elements. Econ. Geol. 83, 537-550.<br />

Barnes, S.J., Hill, R.E.T. <strong>and</strong> Gole, M.J. (1988) The Perseverance <strong>ultramafic</strong> complex, Western Autralia:<br />

<strong>the</strong> product <strong>of</strong> a komatiite lava river. J.Petrol. 29: 305-331.<br />

Barnes, S.-J., <strong>and</strong> Often, M. (1990) Ti-rich komatiites from nor<strong>the</strong>rn Norway. Contrib. Mineral. Petrol.<br />

105: 42-54.<br />

Bird, D.K., Schiffman, P. Elders, W.A., Williams, A.E. & McDowell, S.D. (1984) Calc-silicate mineralization<br />

in active geo<strong>the</strong>rmal systems. Econ. <strong>Geology</strong> 79, 671-695.<br />

Brown, E.H. (1977) The crossite content <strong>of</strong> Ca-amphibole as a guide to presure <strong>of</strong> metamorphism. J.<br />

Petrol. 18, 53-72.<br />

Eilu, P. (1994) Hydro<strong>the</strong>rmal alteration in volcano-sedimentary <strong>rocks</strong> in <strong>the</strong> Central Lapl<strong>and</strong> greenstone<br />

belt, Finl<strong>and</strong>. Geol. Survey Finl<strong>and</strong> Bull. 374, 145 p.<br />

Davidsen, B. (1994) Stratigrafi petrologi og geokjemi med vekt pŒ komatiittiske bergarter innen den<br />

nordligste del av Karasjok gr¿nnsteinsbelte, Brennelv, Finnmark. Unpublished M.Sc. Thesis,<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Tromsö, Department <strong>of</strong> Biology <strong>and</strong> <strong>Geology</strong>. 380 p.<br />

Donaldson, M.J. (1982) Mount Clifford-Marshall Pool are In: Groves, D.I. & Lesher, C.M. (eds.)<br />

Regional geology <strong>and</strong> nickel deposits <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Norseman-Wiluna Belt, Western Australia. University<br />

<strong>of</strong> Western Australia Extension Service, Publication 7, C53-C67.<br />

Gaál, G., Mikkola, A. & Söderholm, B. (1987) An outline <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Precambrian evolution <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Baltic<br />

Shield. Precambrian Res. 6, 199-215<br />

Gaál, G. Ber<strong>the</strong>lsen, A., Gorbatchev, R., Kesola, R., Lehtonen, M.I., Marker, M. & Raase, P. (1989)<br />

Structure <strong>and</strong> composition <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Precambrian crust along <strong>the</strong> POLAR Pr<strong>of</strong>ile in <strong>the</strong> nor<strong>the</strong>rn Baltic<br />

Shield. Tectonophysics 162, 1-25.<br />

Gammon, J.B. (1977) Nikkelletning i Anarjokka. Bergverkens L<strong>and</strong>ssammenslutnings Industrigruppe<br />

(BVLI). Referat fra Nikkelm¿te, 63-77<br />

Gole, M., Barnes, S.J. & Hill, R.E.T. (1987) The role <strong>of</strong> fluids in metamorphism <strong>of</strong> komatiites, Agnew<br />

nickel deposit, Western Australia. Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 96, 151-162.<br />

Haapala, I, Front, K., Rantala, E. & Vaarama, M. (1987) Perology <strong>of</strong> Nattanen-type granite complexes,<br />

nor<strong>the</strong>rn Finl<strong>and</strong>. Precambrian Research. 35, 225-240.<br />

Hakanen, P. (1977) Kittilän <strong>Pulju</strong>n liuskejakson karsivyöhyke. Unpublished M.Sc. Thesis, Turku University,<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>Geology</strong>. 80 p.<br />

Hanski, E. (1986) The Gabbro-Wehrlite Association in <strong>the</strong> Eastern Part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Baltic Shield. In: Friedrich,<br />

G.H., Genkin, A.D., Naldrett, A.J., Ridge, J.D., Sillitoe, R.H., <strong>and</strong> Vokes, F.M. (editors) <strong>Geology</strong><br />

<strong>and</strong> Metallogeny <strong>of</strong> Copper Deposits. Proceedings <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Copper Symposium 27th International<br />

Geological Congress Moscow, 1984. Special Publication No. 4 <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Society for <strong>Geology</strong> Applied<br />

to Mineral Deposits. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg: 151-170.<br />

Hanski,E.J. (1992) Petrology <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Pechenga ferropicrites <strong>and</strong> co-genetic Ni-bearing gabbro-wehrlite<br />

intrusions, Kola Peninsula, Russia. Geol. Survey Finl<strong>and</strong> Bull. 367, 192 p.<br />

Hanski, E.J. & SmolkinV.F. (1989) Pechenga ferropicrites <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r early Proterozoic picrites in <strong>the</strong><br />

eastern part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Baltic Shield. Precambrian Research 45, 63-82.<br />

Hanski, E. (1997) The Nuttio serpentinite belt, Central Lapl<strong>and</strong>: An example <strong>of</strong> <strong>Paleoproterozoic</strong><br />

ophiolitic mantle <strong>rocks</strong> in Finl<strong>and</strong>. Ofioliti 22, 35-46<br />

Heino, T. (1977) <strong>Pulju</strong>n liuskejakson ja Peltotunturin alueen ultramafiittien keskinäistä vertailua. Unpubli-


56<br />

shed M.Sc. Thesis, Turku University, Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>Geology</strong>, 89 p.<br />

Henriksen, H. (1983) Komatiitic chlorite-amphibole <strong>rocks</strong> <strong>and</strong> mafic metavolcanics from <strong>the</strong> Karasjok<br />

greenstone belt, Finnmark, nor<strong>the</strong>rn Norway: a preliminary report. Norges geologiske unders¿kelse<br />

Nr. 382, Bulletin 71, 17-43<br />

Hill, R.E.T., Barnes, S.J., Gole, M.J. <strong>and</strong> Dowling, S.E. (1990) The physical volcanology <strong>of</strong> komatiites in<br />

<strong>the</strong> Norseman - Wiluna belt , Western Australia. Geol. Soc. Australia, Western Australia Division,<br />

Excursion Guide 1. 100 p.<br />

Idman, H. (1980) Lapin ultramafiittien oksidifaasista. Unpublished M.Sc. Thesis, Turku University,<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>Geology</strong>, 147 p<br />

Inkinen, O., Ilvonen, E. & Pelkonen, R. (1984) <strong>Pulju</strong>n liuskejakson ja Hotinvaaran tutkimukset 1982-<br />

1984. Unpublished report, Outokumpu Oy Exploration 54 p.<br />

Julku, T. (1982) Länsi-Inarin liuskejakson sagv<strong>and</strong>iiteista. Unpublished M.Sc. Thesis, Turku University,<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>Geology</strong>. 83 p.<br />

Krill, A.G., Bergh, S., Lindahl, I., Mearns, E.W., Often, M., Olerud, S., Oelsen, O., S<strong>and</strong>stad, J.S.,<br />

Siedlecka, A. & Solli, A. (1985) Rb-Sr, U-Pb <strong>and</strong> Sm-Nd isotopic dates from Precambrian <strong>rocks</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

Finnmark. Norges Geologiske Unders¿kelse, Bulletin 403, 37-54<br />

Koistinen, T & Virransalo, P. (1985) Kittilän Pahtavuoma-Sirkka-alueen rakennegeologiasta ja malminetsinnästä.<br />

Unpublished report, Outokumpu Oy Exploration, Lapin Malmi, 33 p.<br />

Kouvo, O., Huhma, H. & Sakko, M. (1983) Isotopic evidence for old crustal involvement in <strong>the</strong> genesis<br />

<strong>of</strong> two granites from North Finl<strong>and</strong>. Terra Cognita 3, p 135.<br />

Lahtinen, J. (1979) Kittilän Mertavaaran Ni- ja Zn-tutkimukset. Pallasjärven lentoalue 1, 2742. Unpublished<br />

report, Outokumpu Oy Exploration 14 p.<br />

Lehtonen, M.I., Manninen, T., Rastas P., Väänänen, J., Roos, S.I. & Pelkonen, R. (1985) Explanation to<br />

<strong>the</strong> geological map <strong>of</strong> central Lapl<strong>and</strong>. Geological Survey <strong>of</strong> Finalnd, Report <strong>of</strong> Investigation 71, 35<br />

p.<br />

Lehtonen, M.I., Manninen, T., Rastas P. & Räsänen J. (1992) On <strong>the</strong> early Proterozoic metavolcanic <strong>rocks</strong><br />

in Finnish central Lapl<strong>and</strong>. In: Balagansky, V.V & Mitr<strong>of</strong>anov, F.P. (eds.) Correlation <strong>of</strong> Precambrian<br />

formations <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Kola-Karelia region <strong>and</strong> Finl<strong>and</strong>. Apatity, Russian Academy <strong>of</strong> Sciences, 65-<br />

85.<br />

Lehtonen, M.I., Airo, M.-L., Eilu, P., Hanski, E., Korteialinen, V., Lanne, E., Manninen, T., Rastas, P.,<br />

Räsänen, J. & Virransalo, P. (1998) Kittilän vihreäkivialueen geologia, Lapin vulkaniittiprojektin<br />

raportti. Geolical Survey <strong>of</strong> Finl<strong>and</strong>, Report <strong>of</strong> investigation 140. 1-144.<br />

Manninen, T. (1991) Sallan alueen vulkaniitit (Volcanic <strong>rocks</strong> in <strong>the</strong> Salla area, nor<strong>the</strong>astern Finl<strong>and</strong>).<br />

Geological Survey <strong>of</strong> Finl<strong>and</strong>, Report <strong>of</strong> Investigation 104, 97 p.<br />

Marker, M. (1988) Early Proterozoic (c. 2000-1900 Ma) crustal structure <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> nor<strong>the</strong>astern Baltic<br />

Shield: tectonic division <strong>and</strong> tectonogenesis. Norges Geologiske Unders¿kelse Bull. 403, 55-74.<br />

Marshall, B. & Gilligan, L.B. (1993) Remobilization, syn-tectonic processes <strong>and</strong> massive sulfide deposits.<br />

Ore <strong>Geology</strong> Reviews 8, 39-64.<br />

Marshall, B. & Mancini, F. (1994) Major- <strong>and</strong> minor-element mobilization, with implications for Ni-Cu-<br />

Fe sulfide remobilization, during retrograde metasomatism at <strong>the</strong> Vammala Mine, southwest Finl<strong>and</strong>.<br />

Chemical <strong>Geology</strong> 116, 203-227.<br />

Meriläinen, K. (1976) The granulite complex <strong>and</strong> adjacent <strong>rocks</strong> in Lapl<strong>and</strong>, nor<strong>the</strong>rn Finl<strong>and</strong>. Geol.<br />

Survey Finl<strong>and</strong>, Bulletin 281, 129 p.<br />

Meriläinen, M. (1993) Kittilän Mertavaaran kivien petrografiasta ja geokemiasta. Unpublished M.Sc.<br />

Thesis, Turku University, Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>Geology</strong>, 82 p.<br />

Mikkola, E. (1941) Kivilajikartan selitys, Lehdet B7-C7-D7, Muonio-Sodankylä-Tuntsajoki. Geologinen<br />

tutkimuslaitos, Espoo.<br />

Naldrett, A.J. & Turner, A.R. (1977) The geology <strong>and</strong> petrogenesis <strong>of</strong> a greenstone belt <strong>and</strong> related nickel<br />

sulfide mineralization at Yakabindie, Western Australia. Precambrian Research 5, 43-103.<br />

Nesbitt, R.W., Sun, S.-S. <strong>and</strong> Purvis, A.C. (1979) Komatiites: geochemistry <strong>and</strong> genesis. Can. Miner. 17:<br />

165-186.


57<br />

Papunen, H., Ilvonen, E., Idman, H., Pihlaja, P., Neuvonen, K.J. & Talvitie, J. (1977) Lapin ultramafiiteista<br />

(Ultramafics <strong>of</strong> Lapl<strong>and</strong>). Geologinen tutkimuslaitos, Report <strong>of</strong> Investigation 23, 87 p<br />

Papunen, H., Pihlaja, P. & Idman H. (1980) Komatiittiprojektin 1977-1979 datamateriaali. Unpublished<br />

report, University <strong>of</strong> Turku<br />

Papunen, H. & Gorbunov, G.I. (eds.) (1985) Nickel-copper deposits <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Baltic Shield <strong>and</strong> Sc<strong>and</strong>inavian<br />

Caledonides. Geol. Surv. Finl<strong>and</strong> Bull. 333, 394 p.<br />

Patchett, P.J., Kouvo, O., Hedge, C.E. & Tatsumoto, M. (1981) Evolution <strong>of</strong> continental crust <strong>and</strong> mantle<br />

heterogeneity: evidence from Hf isotopes. Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 78, 279-297.<br />

Pearce, J.A. & Cann, J.R. (1973) Tectonic setting <strong>of</strong> basic volcanic <strong>rocks</strong> determined using trace element<br />

analyses. Earth Planet. Sci Letters 19, 290-300<br />

Pearce, T.H. (1968) A contribution to <strong>the</strong> Theory <strong>of</strong> Variation Diagrams. Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 19, 142-<br />

157.<br />

Peltonen, P. (1990) Metamorphic olivine in picritic metavolcanics from sou<strong>the</strong>rn Finl<strong>and</strong>. Bull. Geol.<br />

Soc. Finl<strong>and</strong> 62, 99-114.<br />

Perring, C.S., Barnes, S.J. & Hill, R.E.T. (1995) The physical volcanology <strong>of</strong> Archaean komatiite sequences<br />

from Forrestania, Sou<strong>the</strong>rn Cross Province, Western Australia. Lithos 34: 189-207.<br />

Piquet, D. (1982) M•canismes de recrystallisation m•tamorphique dans les ultrabasites: exemple des<br />

roches vertes Arch•ennes de Finl<strong>and</strong>e Orientale (ceinture de Suomussalmi-Kuhmo) Th•se 3e<br />

cycle. Rennes. 246 p.<br />

Räsänen, J., Hanski, E. & Lehtonen, M. (1989) Komatiites, low-Ti basalts <strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong>esites in <strong>the</strong> Möykkelmä<br />

area, Central Finnish Lapl<strong>and</strong>. Geological Survey <strong>of</strong> Finl<strong>and</strong>, Report <strong>of</strong> Investigation 88, 41 p.<br />

Rastas, J. & Kilpeläinen, T. (1991) Tektonis-metamorfiset tutkimukset Mertavaarassa, <strong>Pulju</strong>n liuskejaksolla.<br />

Turku University, Publication <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>Geology</strong> <strong>and</strong> Mineralogy 25, 19 p.<br />

Rock, N.M.S. (1991) MacSuite, An integrated suite <strong>of</strong> Macintosh geoscientfic programs. Rockware Inc.,<br />

Colorado, USA, 54 p.<br />

Roeder, P.L. & Emslie, R.F. (1970) Olivine-liquid equilibria. Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 29, 275-289.<br />

Russell, J.K. & Nicholls, J. (1988) Analysis <strong>of</strong> petrogenetic hypo<strong>the</strong>ses with Pearce element ratios.<br />

Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 99, 25-35.<br />

Saverikko, M. (1983) The Kummitsoiva komatiite complex <strong>and</strong> its satellites in nor<strong>the</strong>rn Finl<strong>and</strong>. Geol.<br />

Soc. Finl<strong>and</strong>, Bull. 55, 111-139.<br />

Saverikko, M. (1985) The pyroclastic komatiite complex at Sattasvaara in nor<strong>the</strong>rn Finl<strong>and</strong>. Bull. Geol.<br />

Soc. Finl<strong>and</strong> 57, 55-87.<br />

Silvennoinen, A. (1985) On <strong>the</strong> Proterozoic stratigraphy <strong>of</strong> No<strong>the</strong>rn Finl<strong>and</strong>. In: Laajoki, K. & Paakkola,<br />

J. eds. Proterozoic exogenic processes <strong>and</strong> related metallogeny. Proceedings <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> symposium held<br />

in Oulu, Finl<strong>and</strong>, August 15-16, 1983. Geological Survey <strong>of</strong> Finl<strong>and</strong> Bulletin 331, 107-116.<br />

Smith, H.S. & Erlank, A.J. (1982) Geochemistry <strong>and</strong> petrogenesis <strong>of</strong> komatiites from <strong>the</strong> Barberton<br />

greenstone belt, South Africa. In: Arndt, N.T. & Nisbet, E.G. (eds.) Komatiites. George Allen &<br />

Unwin, London. 347-398.<br />

Söderholm, B. (1966) Om berggrunden i Mertavaara och omgivningar i Kittilä kommun. Unpublished<br />

M.Sc Thesis, University <strong>of</strong> Helsinki, Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>Geology</strong> <strong>and</strong> Mineralogy<br />

Stanley, C.R & Russell, J.K. (1989) Petrologic hypo<strong>the</strong>sis testing with Pearce element ratio diagrams:<br />

derivation <strong>of</strong> diagram axes. Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 103, 78-89.<br />

Ward, P., Härkönen, I. & Pankka, H.S. (1989) Structural studies in <strong>the</strong> Lapl<strong>and</strong> greenstone belt, nor<strong>the</strong>rn<br />

Finl<strong>and</strong>, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir application to gold mineralization. In Autio, S. ed: Geological Survey <strong>of</strong> Finl<strong>and</strong>,<br />

Current Research 1988. Geol. Survey Finl<strong>and</strong>, Spec. Paper 10, 71-78<br />

Winchester, J.A. & Floyd, P.A. (1976) Geochemical magma type discrimination: Application to altered<br />

<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> metamorphosed basic igneous <strong>rocks</strong>. Earth. Planetary Sci Lett. 28, 459-469.<br />

Winkler, H.G.F. (1976) Petrogenesis <strong>of</strong> metamorphic <strong>rocks</strong>. Springer-Verlag, New York. 334 p.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!