Gender Report Card on the International Criminal ... - YWCA Canada
Gender Report Card on the International Criminal ... - YWCA Canada
Gender Report Card on the International Criminal ... - YWCA Canada
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Trial Proceedings<br />
Alleged individual criminal resp<strong>on</strong>sibility<br />
of Lubanga<br />
Counsel for <strong>the</strong> Defence, Jean-Marie Biju-Duval,<br />
addressed <strong>the</strong> individual criminal resp<strong>on</strong>sibility<br />
of Lubanga alleged by <strong>the</strong> Prosecuti<strong>on</strong>, including<br />
<strong>the</strong> alleged comm<strong>on</strong> plan, <strong>the</strong> alleged role of<br />
Lubanga in that comm<strong>on</strong> plan, and his alleged<br />
c<strong>on</strong>tributi<strong>on</strong> to <strong>the</strong> recruitment policy of <strong>the</strong><br />
UPC/FPLC. Biju-Duval questi<strong>on</strong>ed <strong>the</strong> foundati<strong>on</strong><br />
of <strong>the</strong> accusati<strong>on</strong>s against Lubanga – namely,<br />
<strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>ory of criminal co-perpetrati<strong>on</strong> – and <strong>the</strong><br />
choices made by <strong>the</strong> Prosecutor in exercising his<br />
power to prosecute. 1221 He noted <strong>the</strong> ‘judicial<br />
paradox’ of a case charged as co-perpetrati<strong>on</strong>,<br />
which by definiti<strong>on</strong> requires several perpetrators,<br />
but with <strong>on</strong>ly <strong>on</strong>e accused. 1222 Biju-Duval noted<br />
that <strong>on</strong>e of Lubanga’s alleged co-perpetrators,<br />
Floribert Kisembo, Chief of Staff of <strong>the</strong> FPLC, had<br />
never been <strong>the</strong> subject of criminal proceedings<br />
before <strong>the</strong> ICC, and suggested that this may have<br />
been due to Kisembo’s loyalty to President Kabila<br />
and <strong>the</strong> C<strong>on</strong>golese Government. 1223<br />
Biju-Duval claimed that <strong>the</strong> absence of<br />
Lubanga’s involvement in <strong>the</strong> military activities<br />
of <strong>the</strong> armed force that would become <strong>the</strong> UPC/<br />
FPLC prior to September 2002 proved that his<br />
c<strong>on</strong>tributi<strong>on</strong> was not necessary to establish<br />
<strong>the</strong> armed force, recruit military pers<strong>on</strong>nel,<br />
or carry out military operati<strong>on</strong>s. Instead, Biju-<br />
Duval argued that Lubanga’s <strong>on</strong>ly essential<br />
c<strong>on</strong>tributi<strong>on</strong> was to act as a political leader. 1224<br />
Biju-Duval claimed that no orders were issued<br />
by Lubanga relating to <strong>the</strong> recruitment or<br />
training of soldiers because he did not intervene<br />
in military affairs <strong>on</strong> recruitment or military<br />
operati<strong>on</strong>s. 1225 He underscored that <strong>the</strong> <strong>on</strong>ly<br />
instructi<strong>on</strong>s issued by Lubanga related to <strong>the</strong><br />
prohibiti<strong>on</strong> of child soldier recruitment and<br />
provisi<strong>on</strong>s for demobilisati<strong>on</strong>. 1226 He went <strong>on</strong> to<br />
argue that Lubanga did not issue orders to <strong>the</strong><br />
civilian populati<strong>on</strong> regarding <strong>the</strong> recruitment<br />
of child soldiers, and that any public statements<br />
made by Lubanga were political in nature and<br />
designed <strong>on</strong>ly to encourage support for his<br />
movement am<strong>on</strong>g <strong>the</strong> civilian populati<strong>on</strong>. 1227<br />
Biju-Duval dismissed <strong>the</strong> Prosecutor’s argument<br />
that <strong>the</strong> resp<strong>on</strong>sibility of Lubanga was based<br />
<strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> fact that he exercised effective c<strong>on</strong>trol<br />
over <strong>the</strong> FPLC commanders resp<strong>on</strong>sible<br />
for recruitment, as this mode of criminal<br />
resp<strong>on</strong>sibility had been dismissed by <strong>the</strong> Pre-<br />
Trial Chamber and had not been charged in <strong>the</strong><br />
case. 1228 Biju-Duval claimed that Lubanga ‘did not<br />
have <strong>the</strong> effective power to impose his will <strong>on</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> military leadership’, and that this was proven<br />
by <strong>the</strong> establishment of breakaway military<br />
movements by former commanders and <strong>the</strong><br />
defecti<strong>on</strong> of Floribert Kisembo as Chief of Staff in<br />
December 2003. 1229<br />
Biju-Duval acknowledged that <strong>the</strong>re was a risk<br />
that children under <strong>the</strong> age of fifteen would<br />
attempt to enlist in <strong>the</strong> FPLC, 1230 but argued that<br />
<strong>the</strong> mode of criminal resp<strong>on</strong>sibility charged<br />
required awareness <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> part of <strong>the</strong> accused<br />
that his c<strong>on</strong>duct would lead to <strong>the</strong> commissi<strong>on</strong><br />
of <strong>the</strong> crimes charged ‘in <strong>the</strong> normal course of<br />
events’. 1231 Biju-Duval referenced existing ICC<br />
jurisprudence from <strong>the</strong> Bemba and Katanga<br />
& Ngudjolo cases, and interpreted this<br />
requirement to require that ‘<strong>the</strong> crime has to<br />
1221 ICC-01/04-01/06-T-357-ENG, p 25 lines 5-10; ICC-01/04-<br />
01/06-2773-Red, paras 52-53, noting that n<strong>on</strong>e of <strong>the</strong><br />
parties requested a modificati<strong>on</strong> pursuant to Regulati<strong>on</strong><br />
55.<br />
1222 ICC-01/04-01/06-T-357-ENG, p 25 lines 11-13; ICC-01/04-<br />
01/06-2773-Red, paras 52-53, para 57; ICC-01/04-01/06-<br />
2786-Red, paras 21-30.<br />
1223 ICC-01/04-01/06-T-357-ENG, p 25 lines 11-25; p 26, lines<br />
1-18.<br />
1224 ICC-01/04-01/06-T-357-ENG, p 29 line 14-25; ICC-01/04-<br />
01/06-2773-Red, paras 63, 792, 795.<br />
1225 ICC-01/04-01/06-T-357-ENG, p 31 lines 1-4; ICC-01/04-<br />
01/06-2773-Red, para 72.<br />
1226 ICC-01/04-01/06-T-357-ENG, p 31 lines 5-18; ICC-01/04-<br />
01/06-2786-Red, para 22.<br />
1227 ICC-01/04-01/06-T-357-ENG, p 32 lines 1-8; ICC-01/04-<br />
01/06-2773-Red, para 72, citing a c<strong>on</strong>fidential filing.<br />
1228 ICC-01/04-01/06-T-357-ENG, p 32 lines 13-20.<br />
1229 ICC-01/04-01/06-T-357-ENG, p 33 lines 1-22.<br />
1230 ICC-01/04-01/06-T-357-ENG, p 35 lines 2-10.<br />
1231 ICC-01/04-01/06-T-357-ENG, p 36 lines 10-13; ICC-01/04-<br />
01/06-2773-Red, paras 74-83.<br />
216