19.01.2015 Views

Gender Report Card on the International Criminal ... - YWCA Canada

Gender Report Card on the International Criminal ... - YWCA Canada

Gender Report Card on the International Criminal ... - YWCA Canada

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Trial Proceedings<br />

Alleged individual criminal resp<strong>on</strong>sibility<br />

of Lubanga<br />

Counsel for <strong>the</strong> Defence, Jean-Marie Biju-Duval,<br />

addressed <strong>the</strong> individual criminal resp<strong>on</strong>sibility<br />

of Lubanga alleged by <strong>the</strong> Prosecuti<strong>on</strong>, including<br />

<strong>the</strong> alleged comm<strong>on</strong> plan, <strong>the</strong> alleged role of<br />

Lubanga in that comm<strong>on</strong> plan, and his alleged<br />

c<strong>on</strong>tributi<strong>on</strong> to <strong>the</strong> recruitment policy of <strong>the</strong><br />

UPC/FPLC. Biju-Duval questi<strong>on</strong>ed <strong>the</strong> foundati<strong>on</strong><br />

of <strong>the</strong> accusati<strong>on</strong>s against Lubanga – namely,<br />

<strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>ory of criminal co-perpetrati<strong>on</strong> – and <strong>the</strong><br />

choices made by <strong>the</strong> Prosecutor in exercising his<br />

power to prosecute. 1221 He noted <strong>the</strong> ‘judicial<br />

paradox’ of a case charged as co-perpetrati<strong>on</strong>,<br />

which by definiti<strong>on</strong> requires several perpetrators,<br />

but with <strong>on</strong>ly <strong>on</strong>e accused. 1222 Biju-Duval noted<br />

that <strong>on</strong>e of Lubanga’s alleged co-perpetrators,<br />

Floribert Kisembo, Chief of Staff of <strong>the</strong> FPLC, had<br />

never been <strong>the</strong> subject of criminal proceedings<br />

before <strong>the</strong> ICC, and suggested that this may have<br />

been due to Kisembo’s loyalty to President Kabila<br />

and <strong>the</strong> C<strong>on</strong>golese Government. 1223<br />

Biju-Duval claimed that <strong>the</strong> absence of<br />

Lubanga’s involvement in <strong>the</strong> military activities<br />

of <strong>the</strong> armed force that would become <strong>the</strong> UPC/<br />

FPLC prior to September 2002 proved that his<br />

c<strong>on</strong>tributi<strong>on</strong> was not necessary to establish<br />

<strong>the</strong> armed force, recruit military pers<strong>on</strong>nel,<br />

or carry out military operati<strong>on</strong>s. Instead, Biju-<br />

Duval argued that Lubanga’s <strong>on</strong>ly essential<br />

c<strong>on</strong>tributi<strong>on</strong> was to act as a political leader. 1224<br />

Biju-Duval claimed that no orders were issued<br />

by Lubanga relating to <strong>the</strong> recruitment or<br />

training of soldiers because he did not intervene<br />

in military affairs <strong>on</strong> recruitment or military<br />

operati<strong>on</strong>s. 1225 He underscored that <strong>the</strong> <strong>on</strong>ly<br />

instructi<strong>on</strong>s issued by Lubanga related to <strong>the</strong><br />

prohibiti<strong>on</strong> of child soldier recruitment and<br />

provisi<strong>on</strong>s for demobilisati<strong>on</strong>. 1226 He went <strong>on</strong> to<br />

argue that Lubanga did not issue orders to <strong>the</strong><br />

civilian populati<strong>on</strong> regarding <strong>the</strong> recruitment<br />

of child soldiers, and that any public statements<br />

made by Lubanga were political in nature and<br />

designed <strong>on</strong>ly to encourage support for his<br />

movement am<strong>on</strong>g <strong>the</strong> civilian populati<strong>on</strong>. 1227<br />

Biju-Duval dismissed <strong>the</strong> Prosecutor’s argument<br />

that <strong>the</strong> resp<strong>on</strong>sibility of Lubanga was based<br />

<strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> fact that he exercised effective c<strong>on</strong>trol<br />

over <strong>the</strong> FPLC commanders resp<strong>on</strong>sible<br />

for recruitment, as this mode of criminal<br />

resp<strong>on</strong>sibility had been dismissed by <strong>the</strong> Pre-<br />

Trial Chamber and had not been charged in <strong>the</strong><br />

case. 1228 Biju-Duval claimed that Lubanga ‘did not<br />

have <strong>the</strong> effective power to impose his will <strong>on</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> military leadership’, and that this was proven<br />

by <strong>the</strong> establishment of breakaway military<br />

movements by former commanders and <strong>the</strong><br />

defecti<strong>on</strong> of Floribert Kisembo as Chief of Staff in<br />

December 2003. 1229<br />

Biju-Duval acknowledged that <strong>the</strong>re was a risk<br />

that children under <strong>the</strong> age of fifteen would<br />

attempt to enlist in <strong>the</strong> FPLC, 1230 but argued that<br />

<strong>the</strong> mode of criminal resp<strong>on</strong>sibility charged<br />

required awareness <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> part of <strong>the</strong> accused<br />

that his c<strong>on</strong>duct would lead to <strong>the</strong> commissi<strong>on</strong><br />

of <strong>the</strong> crimes charged ‘in <strong>the</strong> normal course of<br />

events’. 1231 Biju-Duval referenced existing ICC<br />

jurisprudence from <strong>the</strong> Bemba and Katanga<br />

& Ngudjolo cases, and interpreted this<br />

requirement to require that ‘<strong>the</strong> crime has to<br />

1221 ICC-01/04-01/06-T-357-ENG, p 25 lines 5-10; ICC-01/04-<br />

01/06-2773-Red, paras 52-53, noting that n<strong>on</strong>e of <strong>the</strong><br />

parties requested a modificati<strong>on</strong> pursuant to Regulati<strong>on</strong><br />

55.<br />

1222 ICC-01/04-01/06-T-357-ENG, p 25 lines 11-13; ICC-01/04-<br />

01/06-2773-Red, paras 52-53, para 57; ICC-01/04-01/06-<br />

2786-Red, paras 21-30.<br />

1223 ICC-01/04-01/06-T-357-ENG, p 25 lines 11-25; p 26, lines<br />

1-18.<br />

1224 ICC-01/04-01/06-T-357-ENG, p 29 line 14-25; ICC-01/04-<br />

01/06-2773-Red, paras 63, 792, 795.<br />

1225 ICC-01/04-01/06-T-357-ENG, p 31 lines 1-4; ICC-01/04-<br />

01/06-2773-Red, para 72.<br />

1226 ICC-01/04-01/06-T-357-ENG, p 31 lines 5-18; ICC-01/04-<br />

01/06-2786-Red, para 22.<br />

1227 ICC-01/04-01/06-T-357-ENG, p 32 lines 1-8; ICC-01/04-<br />

01/06-2773-Red, para 72, citing a c<strong>on</strong>fidential filing.<br />

1228 ICC-01/04-01/06-T-357-ENG, p 32 lines 13-20.<br />

1229 ICC-01/04-01/06-T-357-ENG, p 33 lines 1-22.<br />

1230 ICC-01/04-01/06-T-357-ENG, p 35 lines 2-10.<br />

1231 ICC-01/04-01/06-T-357-ENG, p 36 lines 10-13; ICC-01/04-<br />

01/06-2773-Red, paras 74-83.<br />

216

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!