20.01.2015 Views

Timothy – the saviour of Icelandic agriculture?

Timothy – the saviour of Icelandic agriculture?

Timothy – the saviour of Icelandic agriculture?

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Timothy</strong><br />

- <strong>the</strong> <strong>saviour</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Icelandic</strong> <strong>agriculture</strong><br />

Áslaug Helgadóttir and<br />

Þóroddur Sveinsson<br />

The Agricultural University <strong>of</strong> Iceland


Why timothy<br />

• Today timothy is <strong>the</strong> most important<br />

forage grass in <strong>Icelandic</strong> <strong>agriculture</strong>:<br />

– Yielding ability<br />

– Feed quality<br />

– Palatability<br />

– Persistence<br />

• But what has been its role in <strong>the</strong><br />

development <strong>of</strong> agricultural production<br />

1900-2005


Agriculture in a historical light<br />

Cattle<br />

Sheep<br />

250<br />

200<br />

150<br />

100<br />

50<br />

0<br />

1900 1925 1950 1975 2000<br />

Relative changes in cattle and sheep production from 1901-2003.<br />

Volume index 1945=100.


Agriculture in a historical light<br />

I. 900-1900:<br />

Self sufficiency<br />

II. 1900-1945:<br />

Cultivation begins<br />

III. 1945-1980:<br />

Technological advances,<br />

Increased prodcution<br />

IV. 1980-1995:<br />

Prodcution restrictions<br />

V. 1995-2006<br />

Improved efficiency<br />

Cattle Sheep<br />

250<br />

200<br />

150<br />

100<br />

50<br />

0<br />

1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000


Self sufficiency<br />

900-1900<br />

• Sheep husbandry was <strong>the</strong> main farming<br />

activity.<br />

• Hay was obtained from wild pastures and<br />

bog lands.<br />

• The country could carry 360,000 sheep.<br />

• This was sufficient to maintain a<br />

population <strong>of</strong> 60,000.


Cultivation begins<br />

1900-1945<br />

• Urban market for<br />

agricultural products.<br />

• Food security main<br />

political driver.<br />

• Farmers adopt new<br />

technology.<br />

• Artificial fertilisers<br />

taken into use.<br />

Cattle Sheep<br />

250<br />

200<br />

150<br />

100<br />

50<br />

0<br />

1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000


Technological advances,<br />

increased production<br />

1945-1980<br />

• Subsidy system<br />

rewards increased<br />

production.<br />

• Machinery imported<br />

to reclaim new<br />

agricultural land.<br />

• Extensive cultivation<br />

<strong>of</strong> grass fields with<br />

imported grasses.<br />

• Intensive use <strong>of</strong><br />

artificial fertilisers<br />

and concentrates.<br />

Cattle Sheep<br />

250<br />

200<br />

150<br />

100<br />

50<br />

0<br />

1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000


Production restrictions<br />

1980-1995<br />

Cattle<br />

Sheep<br />

• No political will for<br />

continued subsidy.<br />

• Changing food habits.<br />

• Quota system<br />

introduced.<br />

• Production adjusted<br />

to local demand.<br />

250<br />

200<br />

150<br />

100<br />

50<br />

0<br />

1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000


Improved efficiency<br />

1995-2006<br />

• Maintain margins by<br />

reducing inputs and<br />

increase outputs.<br />

• No. <strong>of</strong> farms decline<br />

but each farm gets<br />

larger.<br />

• Alternative land uses.<br />

• Multifunctional<br />

<strong>agriculture</strong>.<br />

Cattle Sheep<br />

250<br />

200<br />

150<br />

100<br />

50<br />

0<br />

1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000


Cultivation <strong>of</strong> grass fields<br />

8000<br />

6000<br />

Ha<br />

4000<br />

2000<br />

0<br />

1920 1940 1960 1980 2000<br />

Year<br />

Annual cultivation <strong>of</strong> grass fields (<strong>of</strong>ficial state records 1921-1992<br />

and estimated from seed imports 1995-2005).


Cultivation <strong>of</strong> grass fields<br />

• Support to farmers for<br />

reclaiming new land<br />

for cultivation 1923.<br />

• Heavy machinery<br />

arrives after World<br />

War II.<br />

• Relcamation <strong>of</strong><br />

drained bogs to 1980.<br />

• Field renovation after<br />

1980.<br />

Ha<br />

8000<br />

6000<br />

4000<br />

2000<br />

0<br />

1920 1940 1960 1980 2000<br />

Year


<strong>Timothy</strong> in farmers’ fields<br />

• <strong>Timothy</strong> and meadow fox-tail dominated<br />

seed mixtures in <strong>the</strong> early years.<br />

– Grindstad (N) and Øt<strong>of</strong>te (DK) 1955<br />

– Engmo (1962); Korpa (1970); Adda (1982)<br />

• <strong>Timothy</strong> made up 40-60% <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> total area<br />

sown 1971-1990.


Persistence <strong>of</strong> timothy<br />

% cover<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

Yr 1 Yr 2-5 Yr 6-10 Yr 11-20 Yr 21-30 >30 yrs<br />

Years from sowing<br />

From Thorvaldsson (1994)


Factors affecting persistence <strong>of</strong><br />

timothy<br />

• Geographic location<br />

• Moisture content<br />

• Degree <strong>of</strong> winter damage<br />

• Management<br />

– Harvest regime<br />

– Fertiliser treatment<br />

– Mixture companions


Period <strong>of</strong> improved efficiency from 1995<br />

• Increased demand for processed milk products.<br />

• Reduction in <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> dairy farms.<br />

• Dairy farms have been increasing in size.<br />

• Increase in milk production per animal:<br />

Milk l cow -1 yr -1<br />

5500<br />

4500<br />

3500<br />

2500<br />

1970 1980 1990 2000 2010<br />

Year


Period <strong>of</strong> improved efficiency from 1995<br />

• Substantial increase in <strong>the</strong> cultivation <strong>of</strong> grass<br />

fields <strong>of</strong> which timothy has made up 75-80 % <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> total area sown:<br />

8000<br />

6000<br />

Ha<br />

4000<br />

2000<br />

0<br />

1920 1940 1960 1980 2000<br />

Year


Has timothy contributed to <strong>the</strong><br />

recent advances in milk production


Reasons for improved efficiency<br />

• Improved quality <strong>of</strong> hay and silage.<br />

• Increased barley production<br />

• Genetic gains in <strong>the</strong> local cattle<br />

population.


Improved quality <strong>of</strong> roughages<br />

720<br />

700<br />

DMD, g kg -1 DM<br />

680<br />

660<br />

640<br />

620<br />

600<br />

580<br />

1975 1985 1995 2005<br />

Mean DMD <strong>of</strong> hay and silage samples from farms in NE-Iceland.


Improved quality <strong>of</strong> roughages<br />

• Earlier harvest <strong>of</strong> primary growth resulting from<br />

<strong>the</strong> uptake <strong>of</strong> wilted round bale silage in <strong>the</strong><br />

1980’s.<br />

• Growing importance <strong>of</strong> timothy after 1995.<br />

– Has made up 75-85% <strong>of</strong> total area sown with<br />

forage grasses.<br />

– Higher DMD compared to a mixture <strong>of</strong><br />

indigenous grasses (726 vs. 679 g kg-1).<br />

– Superior palatability and daily volunatry DM<br />

intake.


Increased barley production<br />

4000<br />

3000<br />

2000<br />

1000<br />

0<br />

‘91 ‘95 ‘00 ‘05<br />

Year<br />

Annual cultivation <strong>of</strong> barley from 1991-2005.


Barley cultivation calls for<br />

systematic crop rotation<br />

Has been<br />

Could be


Systematic crop rotation gives<br />

more fodder <strong>of</strong> better quality<br />

Feed units, million<br />

300<br />

250<br />

200<br />

150<br />

100<br />

50<br />

0<br />

Has been<br />

Could be<br />

Here, timothy plays a major role.


Unconventional uses <strong>of</strong> timothy<br />

• Horse breeding for pleasure riding is now<br />

a significant part <strong>of</strong> <strong>Icelandic</strong> <strong>agriculture</strong>.<br />

• The urban horse population is large and<br />

demands quality feed.


Unconventional uses <strong>of</strong> timothy<br />

<strong>Timothy</strong> cut 2-3 wks after heading and made<br />

into wilted silage fulfils <strong>the</strong> energy and<br />

protein requirements <strong>of</strong> active riding horses<br />

(Ragnarsson, 2004).


Conclusions<br />

• <strong>Timothy</strong> was not an option for farmers until 1970<br />

when winter hardy cultivars came on <strong>the</strong> market.<br />

• Its superior yield and quality was not exploited<br />

fully as persistence was poor and fields were<br />

rarely reneovated.<br />

• Recentemphasisoncroprotationallowsfarmers<br />

to enjoy <strong>the</strong> benefits <strong>of</strong> timothy.<br />

• <strong>Timothy</strong> has without doubt played a big role in<br />

<strong>the</strong> recent advances in milk production obtained<br />

over <strong>the</strong> last decade.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!