Getting on with Government 2.0 - Department of Finance and ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Project 9: Preservation of Web 2.0 content Full report available at http://gov2.net.au/projects/project-9/ Recordkeeping Innovation examined the preservation and record-keeping challenges raised by the use of Web 2.0 tools by agencies, and concluded that a more expansive view of information management is needed and that clearer guidance needs to be provided to agencies about how to effectively capture appropriate records from social media and online engagement tools. To support these objectives, the report also suggested the introduction of more business focused definition of records under the Archives Act 1983 and minimum standards for records management in contract with cloud computing vendors. The report also considered the challenges such as recordkeeping in crowdsourcing projects, co–authorship, engaging with ‘the cloud’ and the need for appropriate disposal of information and FOI proactive disclosure. Project 10: Framework for stimulating information philanthropy in Australia Full report available at http://gov2.net.au/projects/project-10/   Philanthropy Australia investigated the potential for taxation and other concessions to stimulate increased investment in ‘information philanthropy’ projects, including consideration of whether charitable status should apply to such ventures. The report concluded that the current Deductible Gift Recipient (DGR) arrangements do not adequately cater for information philanthropy, and recommended that a new ‘information philanthropy’ DGR category could be added to the legislative definition of charitable purposes, in line with recent changes to UK law and the Productivity Commission review into the not-for-profit sector. Project 13: Government 2.0 governance and institutions: embedding the 2.0 agenda in the Australian Public Service Full report available at http://gov2.net.au/projects/project-13/ Heuris Partners examined the need for organisational and governance reforms to embed the Government 2.0 agenda within the APS and concluded that cultural rather than technological change would be the critical success factor and that this should also influence the choice of a lead agency to mange this change. It also noted that Gov 2.0 required an APS shift towards and outward focused and tailored approach to meeting the needs of the Australian people. The report concludes that while elements of the Gov 2.0 relating to information and technology can be properly allocated to special purpose agencies, effective and timely delivery of the cultural and organisational change agenda needs the power, reach and coordinating capabilities of the Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet as the lead agency. Project 14: Social media for emergency management (Emergency 2.0) Full report available at http://gov2.net.au/projects/project-14/ and additional information available at http://gov2em.net.au/. NGIS investigated leading and emerging best practice in relation to the use of social media for improving location enabled information sharing between emergency management agencies and the affected community. The report showcased a number of useful examples and also provided a roadmap for future work, recommending the need for further targeted research and development, promotion and implementation trials in this area. 92 Engage: <strong>Getting</strong> on with Government 2.0 | report of the government 2.0 taskforce
Project 15: ALRC family violence consultation pilot Full report available at http://gov2.net.au/projects/project-15/ Headshift was engaged to assist the Australian Law Reform Commission to run an online engagement pilot with their stakeholders. This project provides a case study of how an agency can improve its online engagement capabilities by following best practice in the use and management of Web 2.0 tools and community management practices (based on the guidelines developed for Project 8). The report concluded that online consultation is an effective and adaptable engagement technique and such consultations require the right combination of planning, technology and technique to be successful. Project 16: OpinionWatch analysis Full report available at http://gov2.net.au/projects/project-16/ Social Change Online were engaged to use ‘OpinionWatch’ technology developed by Australia’s Information and Communications Technology (ICT) Centre of Excellence (NICTA). This project applied sentiment analysis techniques to provide a fresh perspective on the trends in the views and comments presented to the taskforce through both formal submissions and a range of online engagement channels used by the taskforce.   Project 18: Whole of government video service scoping study Full report available at http://gov2.net.au/projects/project-18/ Vquence provided a scoping study on the viability of a centralised whole of government video service for use by agencies and provide advice on the benefits, costs and risks of different implementation models. The study considered emerging international best practice and recommended a federated solution that would provide agencies with a range of flexible deployment options that would allow video to be published within their existing environments and on central services. The report also recommended adding video search and browsing capabilities to australia.gov.au. Project 19: Online engagement review Full report available at http://gov2.net.au/projects/project-19/ Collabforge undertook a review of the effectiveness of the online engagement practices, techniques and tools used by the taskforce and recommended that they lead to the establishment of a unique online community and recommended that a Government 2.0 community of practice be established to allow discussion to continue. Engage: <strong>Getting</strong> on with Government 2.0 | report of the government 2.0 taskforce 93
Page 1 and 2:
government 2.0 taskforce Engage <st
Page 3 and 4:
The Hon. Lindsay Tanner, MP Ministe
Page 5 and 6:
What’s in a name   ‘Engage’
Page 7 and 8:
Table of contents What’s in a nam
Page 9 and 10:
6 Open government — policy enable
Page 11 and 12:
  Boxes Box 1: New APSC guideline
Page 13 and 14:
Executive summary Web 2.0 and its p
Page 15 and 16:
The National Library of Australia (
Page 17 and 18:
●● properly documented and ther
Page 19 and 20:
Report recommendations Central reco
Page 21 and 22:
Recommendation 6: Make public secto
Page 23 and 24:
7.2 The functions currently perform
Page 25 and 26:
11.2 To protect the commercial-in-c
Page 27 and 28:
1 What is Government 2.0 Being trul
Page 29 and 30:
1.3.1 What is Web 2.0 Until recentl
Page 31 and 32:
2 How does Australia compare intern
Page 33 and 34:
Within the context of Government 2.
Page 35 and 36:
The project will develop recommenda
Page 37 and 38:
Some states and local governments h
Page 39 and 40:
  electronic communications. It w
Page 41 and 42:
More recent developments include:
Page 43 and 44:
3 The foundations of Government 2.0
Page 45 and 46:
Box 2: Permissions, information inn
Page 47 and 48:
Adam Smith and his intellectual des
Page 49 and 50:
1. A Government 2.0 lead agency sho
Page 51 and 52:
3.5.2 The lead agency as an exempla
Page 53 and 54:
The use of the internet as a platfo
Page 55 and 56:
My Museum was part of the stage two
Page 57 and 58:
4.4 Connecting people, problems and
Page 59 and 60:
Human Rights consultation: 156 The
Page 61 and 62:
of aptitude and contribution in the
Page 63 and 64:
In this regard Andrea Di Maio’s w
Page 65 and 66:
create new engagement/participation
Page 67 and 68: ●● collaborative filtering ●
Page 69 and 70: In June 2009, the site had 25,000 p
Page 71 and 72: than marginal cost of transfer in o
Page 73 and 74: Since 2007, the NLA has had histori
Page 75 and 76: Box 12: Reducing metadata paralysis
Page 77 and 78: A federal department was well dispo
Page 79 and 80: cost, that the center of innovation
Page 81 and 82: have passed. 227 At the same time,
Page 83 and 84: According to the Copyright Act 1968
Page 85 and 86: 6.7 Copyright policy should be amen
Page 87 and 88: will have to be found. Those in cha
Page 89 and 90: with the scheme’s requirements. T
Page 91 and 92: Recommendation 8: Information publi
Page 93 and 94: ●● ●● In some cases agencie
Page 95 and 96: Following are some relevant extract
Page 97 and 98: 6.4 Information/records management
Page 99 and 100: Wider use of open and documented st
Page 101 and 102: As Open Forum noted in its submissi
Page 103 and 104: 7 Innovation and the taskforce expe
Page 105 and 106: Even in the short period of its exi
Page 107 and 108: The Economics and Research team fro
Page 109 and 110: 7.4 The taskforce and PSI 7.4.1 Mas
Page 111 and 112: The taskforce funded 17 projects an
Page 113 and 114: Appendices A Terms of reference  
Page 115 and 116: Terms of reference (see numbers abo
Page 117: appropriate to the Web 2.0 environm
Page 121 and 122:   ●● ●● ●● ●● ●
Page 123 and 124: ●● ●● ●● ●● ●●
Page 125 and 126: Concern: Enforcement 338 Explanatio
Page 127 and 128: products and data, and the implemen
Page 129 and 130:   Freemium GovHack Hacking Hashta
Page 131 and 132:   Structured data Syndication Twe
Page 133 and 134: OSDM PSI PSM RDF SBS SEC TCC The Fe
show all

Getting on with Government 2.0 - Department of Finance and ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?